The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002/01/16 - Agenda Packet CI'-' TY ........... OF ' RANC GA j 10500-eivic G~'n[~ r~D~rive Rancho Cucam~n§~c^ 91730 City Office: (90~) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: IsT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. JANUARY 16, 2002 A_clencv, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ............................... Member Grace Curatalo ......................... IVlember Bob Dutton .............................. IVlember Jack Lam .........................City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m, Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers ~ City Council Agenda ~ January 16, 2002 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo__ Dutton , and Williams B.~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation to '~/VeTip" Founder Bill Brownell, for his years of service to our community. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Counciimember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/19/01, 12/26/01 and 1/2/02 and Payroll ending 12/20/01 for the total amount of $1,940,640.98. 2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 23 December 31, 2001. 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" fOr the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for LandScape 29 Maintenance Districts 9 and 10, to be funded from Account Numbers 1139303-5300 and 1140303-5300. RESOLUTION NO. 02-025 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 & 10 AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Agenda 16, 2002 oanuar~ 2 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 36 Construction of the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvement from 400' north of Church Street to 500' north of Base Line Road to be funded from Account Nos. 11123035650/1292112 (drainage) and 11763035650/1301176 (Measure I). RESOLUTION NO. 02-026 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE "HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM 400' NORTH OF CHURCH STREET TO 500' NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval of Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records 42 pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 02-027 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES 6. Approval of Request for Waiver of Rental Fees for the Epicenter 118 Stadium from the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Baseball Club for a Public Workout by the California Angels on February 2, 2002 and February 6, 2002. 7. Approval of Map, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the 120 Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and ,Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 15540, located between the south side of Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, west of Cucamonga Creek, submitted by Van Daele Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 02-028 123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAP NUMBER AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15540 City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02-029 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 2 FOR TRACT MAP 15540 8. Approval of Map, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the 131 Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map No. 15955, located at the northeast corner of San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Jeff Lee. RESOLUTION NO. 02-030 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAP AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15955 RESOLUTION NO. 02-031 135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 15955 9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Project Street, Storm Drain and 143 Landscape Infrastructure generally located on Day Creek Boulevard from the 210 Freeway to 600 feet north of Wilson Avenue on Wilson Avenue, Banyan Street and Vintage Drive all generally between Day Creek ChanneI-SCE Corridor and Bluegrass Avenue (formerly Hanley Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 02-032 146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA REVISED UNIVERSITY PROJECT AND THE STREET, STORM DRAIN AND LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 10. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering 147' the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and :3treet Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract No. 16147, located southwest corner of Banyan Street (formerly Summit) and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc. - APN'S: 225- 171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22 and 25. RESOLUTION NO. 02-033 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16147, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND- IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 02-034 150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 16147 11. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Lease '157' between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc., (CO 92-064) relating to Police Security. 12. Approval of an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and '163 the California Speedway Corporation (CO 02-005) approving the Lease of Speedway-owned property for development of athletic facilities. 13. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance '166 Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 99-32, submitted by Sunrise Development, Incorporated, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. 02-035 '168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda 16, 2002 ~anua,.y 5 14. Approval of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 6075527 in the amount 169 of $14,653.92, for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, Contract No. 00-052. 15. Approval to accept the Construction of the Wilson Avenue Landscape 171 Improvements from San Sevaine Road to Cherry Avenue, LMD #7, Contract No. 01-048 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $181,763,22. RESOLUTION NO. 02-036 175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE WILSON AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN SEVAINE ROAD TO CHERRY AVENUE, LMD #7, CONTRACT NO. 01-048 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ORDINANCE NO. 674 (second reading) 174 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 6 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 178 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-286 (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 2, 2002) RESOLUTION NO. 02-023 179 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-286 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 229 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A request to review and approve the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 02-037 314 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 3. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 316 DRCDCA01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various sections of the Foothill and Industrial Districts by adding or modifying text and graphics regarding the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN 316 AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothirl Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Community Plan. City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 7 CONSIDERATION Of VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 316 DRCVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Community Plan. ORDINANCE NO. 675 332 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT, DRCDCA01-02, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS BY ADDING OR MODIFYING TEXT AND GRAPHICS REGARDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 676 349 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 677 363 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-03, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 8 G...~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PREPARE THE FEDERALLY REQUIRED UPDATE 377 TO THE CITY'S ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (CO 02-006) H.~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CABLE TELEVISION UPDATE (ORAL) 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN EXTENSION OF THE MOBILE HOME ACCORD FOR SEVEN YEARS WITH ALTA LAGUNA, ALTA VISTA, 402 CASA VOLANTE, CHAPPARAL HEIGHTS, FOOTHILL MANOR, SYCAMORE VILLA, AND THE PINES MOBILE HOME PARKS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 404 UPDATE 2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF INLAND 415 EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 2, 2002) RESOLUTION NO. 02-024 417 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF "INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST" J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 9 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 10, 2002, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page · WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIND/gCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177501 005639 A E I CASC ENGINEERING 12/19/01 35.00 MW OH AP00177502 005640 A PLUS ONcE PARALEC4%L 12/19/01 14.22 MW OH AP00177503 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12/19/01 386.55 MW OH AP00177504 001334 ABLAC 12/19/01 294.06 MW OH AP00177505 004347 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 12/19/01 49.99 MW OH AP00177506 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 12/19/01 2,368.00 MW OH AP00177507 005642 ~VANCED PUBLIC EXECUTIVE PRO 12/19/01 350.00 MW OH AP00177808 005231 A~F SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 12/19/01 660.00 MW OH AP00177509 005673 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 12/19/01 211.36 MW OH AP00177510 000492 ;~MERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 12/19/01 404.00 MW OH AP00177511 000667 ARROW=dEAD CREDIT UNION 12/19/01 618.58 MW OH AP00177512 000026 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 12/19/01 9,115.50 MW OH AP00177513 004475 BARNES AND NOBLE 12/19/01 999.94 MW OH AP00177514 000033 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 12/19/01 17.37 MW OH AP00177515 002981 BEARD PROVENCEER ~2~D ASSOC 12/19/01 2,334.00 MW OH AP00177516 002679 BENEFIT CONCEPTS 12/19/01 3,281.00 MW OH AP00177517 005866 BODY CONCEPT 12/19/01 1,021.53 MW OH AP00177518 004699 BORDNER, MARGIE 12/19/01 488.40 MW OH AP00177519 002440 BURRUSO, LISA 12/19/01 16.20 MW OH AP00177520 005638 C D L~XNDECAPING 12/19/01 110.00 MW OH AP00177521 004735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 12/19/01 592.60 MW OH AP00177522 001223 CALSENSE 12/19/01 171.43 MW OH AP00177523 001061 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIE 12/19/01 67.73 MW OH AP00177524 000947 CHARTER CO~V~/NICATIONS 12/19/01 53.51 MW OH AP00177525 000488 CHEVRON USA INC 12/19/01 109.37 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pase 2 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--les: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... pros: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount ~;pe Subs Rel To Note AP00177926 000074 CITY P~ENTALS 12/19/01 295.40 MW OE AP00177527 006197 CL~%SSIC STITCH EMBROIDERY CO 12/19/01 1,419.00 MW OH AP00177528 005407 COMBINq~D M~RTIAL SCIENCE 12/19/01 324.00 MW OR AP00177529 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177530 000130 COMPL~EE SERVICE CO 12/19/01 20,231.84 MW OH AP00177531 001328 CONCD/~NON, S~ARI 12/19/01 199.50 MW OH AP00177532 004208 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 12/19/01 60.00 MW OH AP00177533 006709 COPP CRUSHING, DAN 12/19/01 10.00 MW OH AP00177534 006711 CORPORATE PRINTERS 12/19/01 844.14 MW OH AP00177535 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 12/19/01 200.00 MW OH AP00177536 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 12/19/01 118.50 MW OH AP00177537 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 VM OR Void AP00177538 VOID.CONTIN73 Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 %74 OH Void AP00177539 000085 CUC~J4ONGA CO WATER DIST 12/19/01 17,829.89 MW OH AP00177540 004488 DAGHDEVIRI~, KATHY 12/19/01 81.00 MW OH AP00177541 000105 DDlg GUERRA ~u~D ASSOCIATES 12/19/01 3,856.50 MW OH AP00177542 005063 DEI~MOPJ%, ~L~RIO 12/19/01 35.00 MW OH AP00177543 006064 DEPART~N~f ISS~ 12/19/01 2,096.27 MW OH AP00177544 005581 DESIGNIT INC 12/19/01 530.05 MW OH AP00177545 000107 DETCO 12/19/01 249.40 MW OH AP00177546 004544 DICK, ERIC 12/19/01 75.00 MW OH AP00177547 004544 DICK, ERIC 12/19/01 322.50 MW OH AP00177548 000839 DIETERICH INTERAt~TIONAL TRUCK 12/19/01 103.76 MW OH AP00177949 005744 DIREC'fV 12/19/01 27.99 MW OH · AP00177550 004205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC 12/19/01 58.95 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK Pd~GISTER Page 3 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177551 003364 EIGHTH AVENq3E GRAPHICS 12/19/01 2,396.18 MW OH AP00177552 005137 HMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 12/19/01 715.00 ~ OH AP00177553 090520 EMPLOYMEN~T SYSTEMS INC. 12/19/01 1,567.12 ~ OH AP00177554 000977 HSRI INC 12/19/01 400.00 MW OH AP00177555 000229 SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 12/19/01 209.88 MW OH AP00177556 004914 EXCLUSIVE EMAGHS 12/19/01 13.00 MW OH AP00177557 005521 EXPERIA/~ 12/19/01 54.00 MW OH AP00177558 002909 FILTER RECYCLING SHRVICE INC 12/19/01 260.00 MW OH AP00177559 006556 FINESSE PERSON-Nq~L ASSOCIATES 12/19/01 4,693.88 MW OH AP00177560 005641 FINGERPRINT /~ERICA 12/19/01 852.48 MW OH AP00177561 000724 FLORIO, JO~ 12/19/01 81.00 MW OH AP00177562 004762 FOOTHILL FD~4ILY SHHLTHR 12/19/01 250.00 MW OH AP00177563 000098 FORD PRIN~fING ~ MAILING INC 12/19/01 850.50 MW OH AP00177564 001082 FR/%NKLIN COVEY CO 12/19/01 1,196.90 MW OH AP00177565 005113 FUTURH COMPUTING SOLL~rIONS IN 12/19/01 4,571.44 MW OH AP00177556 005278 G~LLAGI{HR, PATTI 12/19/Qi 150.00 i,~ OH AP00177567 005046 GREAT WEST EQUIPMENT INC 12/19/01 152.74 ~ OH AP00177568 005699 HARAL~24BOS BEVERAGH COMPLY 12/19/01 242.34 ~5~ OH AP00177569 001418 HDL COR~N ~ CO~ 12/19/01 13,200.00 ~4W OH AP00177570 003334 HEILIG, KELLy 12/19/01 108.00 MW OH CC AP00177571 005572 HERN~/~DEZ, JOSE DE JESUS 12/19/01 120.00 MW OH AP00177572 002197 HERTZ EQUIP RE~AL 12/19/01 1,785.10 MW OH AP00177573 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 12/19/01 752.84 MW OH AP00177574 090817 HO~ DEPOT/GECF, THE 12/19/01 1,811.81 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177575 002723 HO~ DEPOT 12/19/01 4.16 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 4 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZ/LLE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... prog: CK200 ¢l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177576 003634 ROUSE OF RUTE 12/19/01 633.00 MW OE ====================================== AP00177577 001325 NURST, CEERYL 12/19/01 313.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177578 008010 BURST, JESSICA 12/19/01 206.82 MW OB Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177579 000092 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 12/19/01 2,308.00 MW AP00177580 002432 INTELLI TECH 12/19/01 75.79 MW AP00177581 002708 INTER METRO 12/19/01 12,989.63 MW AP00177582 004128 KELLY EQUIPMENT 12/19/01 2,182.07 MW AP00177583 000149 KING, LD 12/19/01 4,234.69 MW AP00177584 004982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 12/19/01 18,270.10 MW AP00177685 006516 KRUSE, JOAN A 12/19/01 220.00 MW OH AP00177586 001075 LAS SAFETy SUPPLy INC 12/19/01 231.96 MW AP00177587 000321 L~=NDSCAPE WEST INC 12/19/01 138,153.85 MW OH AP00177588 005287 LEON, LUIS 12/19/01 35.00 MW OH AP00177589 004012 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS 12/19/01 7,529.25 MW OH AP00177590 005274 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 12/19/01 3,023.61 MW OH AP00177591 004189 LONG BEACH UNIFORm4 CO INC 12/19/01 374.53 MW AP00177592 005662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 12/19/01 286.62 MW OH AP00177593 001336 LOWER, D~LENE 12/19/01 251.00 MW OH AP00177594 002587 LUTTERMAN, GEORGE 12/19/01 2,208.00 MW OH AP00177595 004701 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 12/19/01 178.80 MW OH CC AP00177596 005375 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 12/19/01 2,247.00 MW OH AP00177597 006085 MCARDLE, K~VIN 12/19/01 83.82 MW OH AP00177598 007183 MORALES, MELISSA 12/19/01 33.22 MW AP00177599 004442 MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT 12/19/01 50.00 MW OH .A600177600 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA W~ITE 12/19/01 13.85 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 WED, DEC 19, 2002, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINltNCS---job: 68212 #S058 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37~--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount TYPe Subs Rel To Note AP00177601 002248 NAPA AUTO P~TS 12/19/01 512.53 MW OH AP00177602 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 12/19/01 23,529.25 MW OH AP00177603 006137 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 12/19/01 1,100.00 MW OH AP00177604 002090 NBSGOVE~_N]4ENT FINANCE GROUP 12/19/01 1,040.24 MW OH AP00177605 004527 NIKPOUR, MOHDJ~MED 12/19/01 70.00 MW OH AP00177606 000433 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 12/19/01 454.96 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177607 005633 NORTHWEST MEDIA INC 12/19/01 30.00 MW ON AP00177608 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 12/19/01 3,470.03 MW OH AP00177609 000232 OMNITRANS 12/19/01 537.50 MW OH AP00177610 004904 OTT, LAU]{A 12/19/01 502.50 MW OH AP00177611 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 12/19/01 884.68 MW OH AP00177612 005631 PACIFIC COS~V~3NITIES 12/19/01 632.88 MW OH AP00177613 000818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 12/19/01 207.06 MW OH AP00177614 004529 PARSAC 12/19/01 63,719.29 MW OH AP00177618 006755 PARSONS BRINKEP~qOFF QUADS ~ 12/19/01 27,824.34 MW OH AP00177616 005408 PEEK A BOO ULTRASOUNDS 12/19/01 225.00 MW OH AP00177617 004656 PEREZ, HECTOR 12/19/01 70.00 MW OH AP00177618 000255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 12/19/01 1,990.25 MW OH AP00177619 004401 PRA~AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 12/19/01 248.27 MW OH AP00177620 002533 PRENTICE HALL 12/19/01 38.08 MW OH AP00177621 000583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 12/19/01 193.07 MW OH AP00177622 005632 QUALITY FIRST CONCRETE 12/19/01 15.00 MW OH AP00177623 001323 QUINT~A, ZITA 12/19/01 193.00 MW OH AP00177624 002496 RANCHO GRANDE KIWANIS 12/19/01 100.00 MW OH AP00177625 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 12/19/01 424.27 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/'19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 6 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~Jnount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177626 004472 REDINOER, TOM 12/19/01 70.00 MW OH AP00177627 001324 REINI{ARDTSEN, DEBRA 12/19/01 282.50 MW OH AP00177628 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRIC~J~ EUPPL 12/19/01 92.89 MW OH AP00177829 000443 R/~I CONSULTING 12/19/01 960.00 MW OH AP00177630 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CRILD SUPPO 12/19/01 150.00 MW OH AP00177631 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 12/19/01 226.00 MW OH AP00177632 004257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPAN 12/19/01 23,641.61 MW OH AP00177633 005570 RODRIOUEZ, OSCAR 12/19/01 120.00 MW OH AP00177634 005629 ROOMS N'COVERS ETC 12/19/01 23.00 MW OH AP00177635 002082 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 12/19/01 132.66 MW OH AP00177636 004438 S C A C E O 12/19/01 120.00 MW OH AP00177637 004628 S R CONSULTANTS 12/19/01 834.06 MW OH AP00177638 001590 SAN BER~ COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 12/19/01 289.68 MW OH AP00177639 001590 SAN BERN COUNTy CHILD SUPPORT 12/19/01 200.00 MW OH AP00177640 000214 SAN BEP~N COUNTY 12/19/01 1,862.50 MW OH AP00177641 005637 SCORTINO, NICK 12/19/01 35.00 MW OH AP00177642 005671 SEARING INDUSTRIES 12/19/01 18,399.97 MW OH AP00177643 003896 SENECHAL, CAL 12/19/01 324.00 MW OH AP00177644 001829 SPARED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 12/19/01 312.00 MW OH AP00177645 006728 S~AW CONTRACT FLOORING 12/19/01 3,685.00 MW OH AP00177646 091932 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SVCS 12/19/01 6.18 MW OH AP00177647 005607 SILVA, ELENA 12/19/01 200.00 MW OH AP00177648 001327 SMART AND FINAL 12/19/01 613.11 MW OH AP00177649 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 12/19/01 11.82 MW OH AP00177650 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMP~N'Y 12/19/01 1,848.08 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--lo¢: FINANCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... pros: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177651 001828 SOFT CHOICE CORP 12/19/01 1,277.70 MW OH AP00177652 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 %74 OH Void AP00177653 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 ~74 OH Void AP00177654 001432 SOUTHEP~N CALIFORNIA EDISON 12/19/01 6,991.70 MW OH AP00177655 005722 SPECTRA COMPANY 12/19/01 498.00 ~; OH AP00177656 001335 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE 12/19/01 152.85 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177657 001335 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE 12/19/01 49.65 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177658 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12/19/01 14,058.70 MW OH AP00177659 003632 STEELWOPdfERS OLDTI~ERS FOUNDA 12/19/01 1,580.47 MW OH AP00177660 004132 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 12/19/01 95.10 MW OH AP00177661 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 12/19/01 25.00 ~ OH AP00177662 004733 SUNRISE FORD 12/19/01 244.43 ~ OH AP00177663 006159 T S C G (TECHNOLOGY CONSULTIN 12/19/01 11,027.12 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177664 002344 T~GET 12/19/01 68.98 MW OH AP00177665 002718 TERRY, DONNA 12/19/01 252.00 MW OH AP00177666 002584 TIME WA~/~ER TELECOM 12/19/01 2,500.00 MW OH AP00177667 001919 TOMARK SPORTS INC 12/19/01 202.10 ~q OH AP00177668 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 12/19/01 1,005.61 MW OH AP00177669 005601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN 12/19/01 567.13 MW OH AP00177670 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 12/19/01 44.34 MW OH AP00177671 003844 UNITED RENTALS 12/19/01 45.00 MW OH AP00177672 000919 UNITED WAY 12/19/01 632.32 MW OH AP00177673 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 12/19/01 39,171.93 MW OE AP00177674 004296 UPSCO 12/19/01 398.20 MW OH AP00177675 006273 VERISIGN/NETWORK SOLUTIONS 12/19/01 109.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177676 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177677 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 12/19/01 3,950.27 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177678 000137 VERIZON CALIFOREIA 12/19/01 37.45 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177679 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177680 VOID.CONTIN~3 Void - Continued Stub 12/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177681 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/19/01 4,649.81 MW OH AP00177682 006616 VILLAGOMEZ, C~ARLEI 12/19/01 28.64 MW OH AP00177683 005870 VL SYSTEMS INC 12/19/01 11,550.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177684 001329 VOLM, LIZA 12/19/01 112.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177685 004977 VOSS, ~u~RY 12/19/01 22.25 MW OH AP00177686 005645 WATKINS, JOANN 12/19/01 30.00 MW OH AP00177687 000213 WAXIE 12/19/01 5,188.15 MW OH AP00177688 006637 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 12/19/01 2,530.53 MW OH AP00177689 005646 WHITE, STEPHEN G 12/19/01 1.50 MW OH AP00177690 000212 WILLDD/g ASSOCIATES 12/19/01 31,465.50 MW OH AP00177691 001940 WORLDCOM 12/19/01 1,270.41 MW OH AP00177692 005649 WOR~)/~qL, AMy 12/19/01 100.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9 WED, DEC 19, 2001, 5:26 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 68212 #S058 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 8 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 629,330.11 Number of Checks Processed: 184 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 629,330.11 CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/26/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CNECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, DEC 26, 2001, 3:19 PM --req: KFINCEER--leH: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 68679 #S047 ..... proH: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177767 002019 3 D CARPET ~ DRAPERIES 12/26/01 275.00 MW OH AP00177768 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12/26/01 16.13 MW AP00177769 005431 ~VANCED SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 12/26/01 48,190.10 MW AP00177770 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 12/26/01 965.00 MW AP00177771 005711 ~q HA CONSULTING CORPORATION 12/26/01 38.00 MW OH AP00177772 006172 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 12/26/01 1,694.50 MW OH AP00177773 002283 ~S PLJ~NING RESEARCH CORP 12/26/01 25,449.79 MW OH AP00177774 005717 ARBO, VIRGINIA 12/26/01 200.00 MW OH AP00177775 005716 AHCINO BAG~AL, GINA 12/26/01 60.00 MW OH AP00177776 001291 AHCUS DATA SECURITY 12/26/01 452.00 MW OH AP00177777 000667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 12/26/01 7,710.90 MW OH AP00177778 004475 BAR/~ES ~ NOBLE 12/26/01 752.62 MW OH AP00177779 001247 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 12/26/01 306.81 MW OH AP00177780 004369 BRODART BOOKS 12/26/01 288.29 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177781 005481 BURNETT, CA~DYCE 12/26/01 40~00 MW OH AP00177782 005715 CASELL~%, BRUCE 12/26/01 7.00 MW OH AP00177783 000266 CERTIFIED AUtO CARE 12/26/01 2,106.61 MW OH AP00177784 006052 C~{ARTER MEDIA 12/26/01 1,756.00 MW ON Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177785 005724 CORDIAL GREETINGS BY THAYER 12/26/01 129.45 MW OH AP00177786 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177787 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 12/26/01 15,554.44 MW OH AP00177788 005727 D~4I~N, MARIA 12/26/01 38.00 MW OH AP00177789 004366 DEMCO INC 12/26/01 105.30 MW OH AP00177790 005728 DOBBS, MARCIA 12/26/01 65.00 MW OH AP00177791 041257 Db-gALL, KAREN 12/26/01 60.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/26/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2 WED, DEC 26, 2001, 3:19 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68679 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177792 006536 EASTER, PAMELA 12/26/01 125.00 MW OH AP00177793 006536 EASTER, PAMELJ~ 12/26/01 45.00 MW OH AP00177794 003364 EIGHTR AVE~TJE GRAPHICS 12/26/01 940.20 954 OH AP00177795 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 12/26/01 890.88 MW OH AP00177796 005729 ESTEVES, GRACE 12/26/01 60.00 MW OH AP00177797 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 12/26/01 2,488.60 MW OH AP00177798 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 12/26/01 737.02 MW OH AP00177799 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 12/26/01 282.40 MW OH AP00177800 005279 GASB 12/26/01 4.75 MW OH AP00177801 005955 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 12/26/01 88.92 MW OH AP00177802 005731 GOMEZ, SA/qDRA 12/26/01 125.00 MW OH AP00177803 004913 GROLIER PUBLISHING CO INC 12/26/01 148.04 MW OH AP00177804 005687 HAWKS, JUDy 12/26/01 7.00 MW OH AP00177805 003125 HI ST~NDARD AUTOMOTIVE 12/26/01 138.01 MW OH AP00177806 004150 HOLIDAY PRINTING 12/26/01 18,990.98 MW OH AP00177807 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 12/26/01 470.27 MW OH AP00177808 003633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS /LND E 12/26/01 406.00 MW OH AP00177809 001234 HOSE MAN INC 12/26/01 384.58 MW OH AP00177810 000161 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 12/26/01 6.74 MW OH AP00177811 005689 EURST, KATRINA JOHNSON 12/26/01 10.00 MW OH AP00177812 001121 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 12/26/01 679.40 MW OH AP00177813 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 12/26/01 496.73 MW OH AP00177814 006497 INSIGHT DIRECT 12/26/01 4,822.99 MW OH AP00177815 005283 JONES A/qD MAYER, LAW OFFICES 12/26/01 1,250.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177816 000179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 12/26/01 43,887.70 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3 WED, DEC 26, 2001, 3:19 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINA/~CE---job: 68679 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~mount Type Subs Rel To Note AP001778t7 005690 KAR~-MAT, JED2qNINE 12/26/01 12.50 MW OH AP00177818 005694 KE~RD, JAMES 12/26/01 200.00 MW OH AP00177819 000149 KING, LD 12/26/01 1,455.00 MW OH AP00177820 004982 KOR3~DA CONSTRUCTION 12/26/01 125.00 ~ OH AP00177821 002633 LAM, JACK 12/26/01 36.65 MW OH AP00177822 000195 I~NCE SOLL D2qD LUNGHARD 12/26/01 16,573.92 MW OH AP00177823 000979 LEWIS OPERATING CORP 12/26/01 25.50 MW OH AP00177824 000979 LEWIS OPERATING CORP 12/26/01 8.50 MW OH AP00177825 004517 LEYBA, DENISE 12/26/01 200.00 ~ OH AP00177826 001008 LOWE'S COMP~NIES INC. 12/26/01 629.13 MW OH AP00177827 000549 ~RIPOSA HORTICULTURAL EN~f IN 12/26/01 2,977.38 MW OH AP00177828 006085 MC~RDLE, K~VIN 12/26/01 140.00 MW OH AP00177829 002198 MICHAELS STORES INC 3019 12/26/01 137.51 MW OH AP00177830 006170 MICROAGE COMP%UfER~4ART 12/26/01 88.15 MW OH AP00177831 005695 MOSIER, GARY 12/26/01 65.00 MW OH AP00177832 032498 MOUSSAVI, SARAH 12/26/01 6.00 ~ OH AP00177833 004442 MUNICIPAL M~_NAGEMEN~ 12/26/01 50.00 MW OH AP00177834 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12/26/01 548.75 ~5~ OH AP00177835 032090 NAVAR, LAUR3~ 12/26/01 60.00 ~W OH AP00177836 004853 OCLC INC 12/26/01 58.03 ~ OH AP00177837 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 12/26/01 2,041.86 MW OH AP00177838 000232 OMWITP3~NS 12/26/01 205.00 MW OH AP00177839 006722 OPEN APPS 12/26/01 2,187.63 MW OH AP00177840 001824 ORIENTAL TR3~DING 12/26/01 303.71 MW OH AP00177841 005705 ORWIG, DE~2qNA 12/26/01 33.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 WED, DEC 26, 2001, 3:19 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--lo~: FINANCE---job: 68679 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Typ~ Subs Rel To Note AP00177842 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 12/26/01 519.18 ~4W OH AP00177843 006681 POMONA INI~A-N~D VALLEY COUNCIL 12/26/01 729.00 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177844 000758 PP3~AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 12/26/01 2.78 MW AP00177845 005330 PRO ED 12/26/01 1,086.80 MW OH AP00177846 003444 PROJECT SISTER 12/28/01 116.40 MW AP00177847 005174 R3~NCHO CUC~ONGA F~4ILY YMCA 12/26/01 1,500.00 MW OH AP00177848 005435 HEGUENA, ALMA 12/26/01 65.00 ~ AP00177849 005618 RIC~L~qDS WATSON A~rD GERSHON 12/26/01 34,775.94 MW OH AP00177850 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRI~ 12/26/01 77.72 MW OH AP00177851 005700 ROLD~NDO, CIPRIANA 12/26/01 45.00 ~5~ OH AP00177852 006673 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 12/26/01 864.96 MW OH AP00177853 005733 ROUCH, PETER A 12/26/01 426.10 MW OH AP00177854 005698 RUSSELL, CARLTON 12/26/01 60.00 MW OH AP00177855 006492 SANCHEZ, JOE 12/26/01 267.12 MW OH AP00177856 001327 SMART ~%N-D FINAL 12/26/01 66.01 MW OH AP00177857 012139 SMITH, GISELLJ~ 12/26/01 40.00 MW OH AP00177858 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMP~Ny 12/26/01 718.13 MW OH AP00177859 005623 SOIL AND PI~NT I~BORATORY INC 12/26/01 104.00 MW OH AP00177860 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 12/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177861 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177862 VOID.CON~INU Void - Continued Stub 12/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177863 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177864 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 12/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177865 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12/26/01 19,075.42 MW OH AP00177866 003058 STATE OF C~%LIFOR/~IA 12/26/01 832.00 MW OH CITY OF HC IFAS (PROD) 12/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 5 WED, DEC 26, 2001, 3:19 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 68679 #S047 ..... pros: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177867 006355 SUNGARD BI TECE INC 12/26/01 56,625.07 MW OH AP00177868 005710 SWEET, STACY 12/26/01 33.00 MW OH AP00177869 003735 TiMXVNER, O C 12/26/01 2,377.29 MW OH AP00177870 002344 TARGET 12/26/01 321.42 MW OH AP00177871 005726 TREVARTHEN, D~kN 12/26/01 437.12 MW OH AP00177872 002958 I/MPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 12/26/01 2,765.00 MW OH AP00177873 004206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 12/26/01 332.72 MW OH AP00177874 005601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN 12/26/01 286.55 MW OH AP00177875 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 12/26/01 322.50 MW OH AP00177876 005703 VAN LUND, JAMES 12/26/01 60.00 MW OH AP00177877 000137 VERIZON CALIFOP~NIA 12/26/01 256.64 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177878 006616 VILLAGOMEZ, CHARLEI 12/26/01 53.48 MW OH AP00177879 000696 W~34SLEY, DONNA 12/26/01 41.06 MW OH AP00177880 004002 WASTE ~{ANAGEMENT 12/26/01 257.26 MW OH AP00177881 000872 WITTER, JOiMN!NE 12/26/01 320.00 MW OH AP00177882 012046 WL HOliES LLC 12/26/01 302.65 ~ OH AP00177883 005706 WOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICES 12/26/01 80.00 MW OH AP00177884 005708 WONG, ANTHONY 12/26/01 60.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6 WED, DEC 26, 2001, 3:19 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 68679 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~nount T~pe Subs Rel To Note GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 6 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 338,215.69 Number of Checks Processed: 112 Total Hand Written 0~00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 338,215.69 'CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C B E C K R E O I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, JD2g 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: OL JL--loc: FIRL~NCE---job: 69243 #8064 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~uount T~rpe Subs Rel To Note AP00177893 000010 A D2gD R TIRE SERVICE 01/02/02 184.55 MW OH AP00177894 000001 AA EQUIPMERVf RENTALS CO INC 01/02/02 52.74 F~4 OH AP00177895 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 01/02/02 53.19 ~g OH AP00177896 001334 ABI~AC 01/02/02 294.06 ~K~ OH AP00177897 000007 ABLETRONICS 01/02/02 122.47 MW OH AP00177898 003070 ABSOLUTE ASP~L~LT INC 01/02/02 378.40 ~ OH AP00177899 005794 ACS AIR CONTROL SYSTEMS INC 01/02/02 43.20 ~ OH AP00177900 022020 ~D~, N~Cy 01/02/02 14.00 F~ OH AP00177901 000211 ~DT SECURITY SERVICES INC 01/02/02 282.00 MW OH AP00177902 005793 ADVOCATE SCROOLS 01/02/02 170.18 MW OH AP00177903 021700 AIR LIQUIDE ~4ERICA CORPORATI 01/02/02 121.74 Ff~ OH AP00177904 005673 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 01/02/02 185.58 MW OH AP00177905 005805 ALSHIN TIRE CORPOP~ATION 01/02/02 200.00 ~FW OH AP00177906 002254 ~4ERIC;tN PACIFIC HOMES INC 01/02/02 4,202.72 ~ OH AP00177907 005796 APEX PAINTING COMPLY 01/02/02 20.05 ~Sg OH AP00177908 000024 D~RBOR 5~3RSERY INC 01/02/02 1,353.43 ~Sg OH AP00177909 005807 ARCHITERP~ DESIGN GROUP 01/02/02 796.85 MW OB AP00177910 002299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES 01/02/02 32.14 ~ OH AP00177911 005250 ARROYO PACKAGING 01/02/02 1,506.90 MW OH AP00177912 002014 ARTISTIC SIGNATURES 01/02/02 557.98 MW OB AP00177913 002437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 01/02/02 150.00 MW OH AP00177914 000033 BASELI~E TRUE VD~LUE HARDWARE 01/02/02 34.28 MW OB AP00177915 004441 BEST BUY CO INC 01/02/02 103.16 MW OH AP00177916 000041 BISHOP COMP~dgY 01/02/02 1,440.28 MW OH AP00177917 001746 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 01/02/02 2,088.56 MW OB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2 ~WED, J~/~ 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 69243 #S064 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177918 VOID.CONTI~3 Void - Continued Stub 01/02/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177919 004369 BROD/LRT BOOKS 01/02/02 3,148.96 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177920 001223 CALSENSE 01/02/02 2,981.55 MW OH AP00177921 001061 CH~34PION AWARDS A/qD SPECIDJ~IE 01/02/02 1,502.85 MW OH AP00177922 006464 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 01/02/02 15,494.00 ~ OH AP00177923 003073 COLOR/~MA WHOLESALE NURSERY 01/02/02 318~20 MW OH AP00177924 001328 CONC~i~NON, S~L~RI 01/02/02 199.50 ~ OH AP00177925 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 01/02/02 118.50 MW OH AP00177926 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 01/02/02 200.00 954 OH AP00177927 005779 CSMFO 2002 /LNN~3AL CONFEP~ENCH 01/02/02 225.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177928 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 01/02/02 0.00 VM OH Void AP00177929 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 01/02/02 0.00 1~4 OH Void AP00177930 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 01/02/02 19,136.28 MW OH AP00177931 004282 D 7 CONSULTING INC 01/02/02 375.00 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177932 000239 D ~ K CONCRETE CONP/LNY 01/02/02 513.86 5TW OH AP00177933 000107 DETCO 01/02/02 37.11 ~q OH AP00177934 004544 DICK, ERIC 01/02/02 327.50 ~5~ OH AP00177938 005760 DIRECT MORTGAGE INC 01/02/02 33.00 MW OH AP00177936 041133 DREYERS GR3%ND ICE CP~E/%M 01/02/02 117.18 ~ OH AP00177937 006536 EASTER, P~2~ELA 01/02/02 85.00 MW OH AP00177938 005740 EDC EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT C 01/02/02 296.95 MW OH AP00177939 003364 EIGHTH AVENq3E GRAPHICS 01/02/02 876.13 MW OH AP00177940 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 01/02/02 6,726.72 MW OH AP00177941 000229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 01/02/02 3,372.54 MW OH AP00177942 000123 FEDEP~%L EXPRESS CORP 01/02/02 88.94 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3 WED, JAN 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 69243 #S064 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177943 000124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLA/krD INC 01/02/02 1,224.34 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177944 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 01/02/02 2,406.60 MW OH AP00177946 003197 FIREMASTER 01/02/02 125~00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177946 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 01/02/02 1,083.56 MW OH AP00177947 005351 FOOTHILL AUTO BODY 01/02/02 901.64 MW OH AP00177948 005278 GALLAGHER, PATTI 01/02/02 75.00 MW OH AP00177949 005737 GAME ROOM GALLERY 01/02/02 28.96 MW OH AP00177950 005157 GEORAL INTERNATIONAL 01/02/02 774.04 MW OH AP00177951 000650 GRAINGER, WW 01/02/02 1,697.27 MW OH AP00177952 000650 GRAINGER, WW 01/02/02 473.02 MW OH AP00177953 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 01/02/02 328.59 MW OH AP00177954 004486 GUARDIAN 01/02/02 2,862.75 MW OR AP00177955 006044 HAPpy ELVES DECORATING 01/02/02 4,455.00 MW OH AP00177956 000462 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 01/02/02 371.67 MW OH AP00177957 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 01/02/02 493.38 MW OH AP00177958 001234 HOSE MAN INC 01/02/02 544.69 MW OH AP00177959 000161 EOYT LL~4BER CO, S M 01/02/02 118.47 MW OH AP00177960 006448 HURLEY, ROGER 01/02/02 300.00 MW OH AP00177961 001325 HURST, CHERYL 01/02/02 313.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00177962 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 01/02/02 152.06 MW OH AP00177963 000092 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 01/02/02 3,247.08 MW OH AP00177964 090933 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 01/02/02 301.38 MW OH AP00177965 002462 J D C IHC 01/02/02 31,742.66 MW OH AP00177966 002867 KENDRENA, DONNA 01/02/02 148.18 MW OH AP00177967 005758 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN X61007 01/02/02 46.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 'WED, JAN 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZ~J~E--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 69243 #S064 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177968 000193 L~IRD CONSTRUCTION CO 01/02/02 9,972.90 MW O~ AP00177969 000849 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 01/02/02 466.62 MW O~ AP00177970 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 01/02/02 6,600.00 MW OH AP00177971 005769 LINGLE BROS COFFEE INC 01/02/02 11.24 MW OR AP00177972 005274 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 01/02/02 95.00 MW OH AP00177973 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 01/02/02 251.00 MW O~ AP00177974 005768 LPC ACQUISITION 01/02/02 500.00 MW OR AP00177975 003156 LUS LIGRTHOUSE INC 01/02/02 177.92 MW OR AP00177976 006506 M D ELECTRIC 01/02/02 1,423~05 MW OR AP00177977 004727 MARSEALL PLUMBING 01/02/02 5,981.10 MW OH AP00177978 001025 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMP~Y 01/02/02 2~7.45 MW OW AP00177979 005852 MIDWEST TAPE 01/02/02 238.90 MW O~ AP00177980 005771 MOJABES CHIROPRACTIC REaL, BE C 01/02/02 118.22 MW O~ AP00177981 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA W~ITE 01/02/02 13.85 MW OH AP00177982 002248 NAPA AUTO P;LRTS 01/02/02 791.35 MW OH AP00177983 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 01/02/02 22,724.18 MW ON AP00177984 005773 OAK LEAF LANDSCAPE INC 01/02/02 8.20 MW OM AP00177985 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/02/02 4,251.33 MW OR AP00177986 005778 OLYMPIA GLASS ~_NqD META3~ INC 01/02/02 90.00 MW OH AP00177987 090333 ONTARIO, CITY OF 01/02/02 23,775.75 MW OR Payee Name different in Che~k DB AP00177988 003273 OTSUKA, DENNIS 01/02/02 100.00 MW O~ AP00177989 005785 OVER MY ~F2~D 01/02/02 25.20 MW O~ AP00177990 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 01/02/02 31.71 MW OR AP00177991 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION 01/02/02 65.05 MW O~ AP00177992 005409 PARTS~ASTER INC 01/02/02 204.53 MW O~ CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 WED, J~N 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 69243 #S064 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177993 006205 PETEPd~U~N LUMBER 01/02/02 141.39 MW OH AP00177994 004401 PRA~AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 01/02/02 247.31 MW OH AP00177995 000758 PRA.~AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 01/02/02 209.89 MW OH AP00177996 000583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 01/02/02 138.60 MW OH AP00177997 001323 QUINTD/gA, ZITA 01/02/02 193.00 MW OH AP00177998 005751 RAMIREZ, ENRIQUE 01/02/02 10.40 MW OH AP00177999 005735 RAMONA MARKET&LIQUOR #3 INC 01/02/02 33.20 MW OH AP00178000 005736 REDLANDS PLL~4BING 01/02/02 10.09 MW OH AP00178001 001324 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 01/02/02 282.50 MW OH AP00178002 011825 RHINO LININGS OF P3~NCHO 01/02/02 636.20 MW OH AP00178003 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 01/02/02 150.00 MW OH AP00178004 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD EUPPO 01/02/02 226.00 MW OH AP00178005 000626 ROBLEE SR, RAUL p 01/02/02 187.50 MW OH AP00178006 011890 ROSS DRESS FOR LESS 212 01/02/02 23.02 MW OH AP00178007 005738 RUBIO'S BAJA GRILL 01/02/02 46.00 MW OH AP00178008 005739 SAGAA~DOY, TERESITA AND FPd~DER 01/02/02 999.00 MW OH AP00178009 005741 S~d~'S TROPICAL FISH & PETS 01/02/02 18.99 MW OH AP00178010 001590 E~N BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 01/02/02 200.00 MW OH AP00178011 001590 SD~N BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 01/02/02 289.68 MW OH AP00178012 001441 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 01/02/02 4,603.91 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00178013 005749 SIX FOLD CORP 01/02/02 2,000.00 MW OH AP00178014 001327 SMART ~ FINAL 01/02/02 91.03 MW OH AP00178015 001432 SOUTHER/g CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/02/02 2,119.33 MW OH AP00178016 004284 SPORT C~k~LET TEAM DIVISION 01/02/02 2,777.12 MW OH AP00178017 001335 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FR~NCHISE 01/02/02 49.65 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 6 ~WED, JAN 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 69243 #S064 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00178018 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 01/02/02 708.33 MW OH AP00178019 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 01/02/02 25.00 AP00178020 005750 STORQUEST-P~ANCEO CUCAMONGA 01/02/02 30.18 MW OH AP00178021 005676 STORYTELLERS & TROUABADOURS U 01/02/02 300.00 MW OR AP00178022 005801 T/L~NER, JO~/g 01/02/02 200.00 MW OH AP00178023 002344 TARGET 01/02/02 64.09 MW OH AP00178024 003942 TEP/~INIX INTERNATIONAL 01/02/02 639.00 MW OH AP00178025 004888 THOMAS, KIMBERLy 01/02/02 49.71 MW OB AP00178026 003388 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 01/02/02 36,868.00 MW OH AP00178027 005806 TRUGREEN LA~qDCARE 01/02/02 401.75 MW OH AP00178028 000919 UNITED WAY 01/02/02 632.32 MW OH AP00178029 005789 UPLD/gD AUTO WHOLESALE 01/02/02 46.76 MW OH AP00178030 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/02/02 816.62 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00178031 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/02/02 264.78 MW OW AP00178032 001103 VISTA PAINT 01/02/02 252.94 MW OH AP00178033 001329 VOLM, LIZA 01/02/02 112.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB AP00178034 005795 WALLACE, MICHELLE 01/02/02 200.00 MW OH AP00178038 004002 WASTE MANAGEMENT 01/02/02 232.35 MW OH AP00178036 000213 WAXIE 01/02/02 3,950.16 MW OH AP00178037 005798 WELDAY'S PLU}4BING 01/02/02 20.00 MW OH AP00178038 005175 WEST COAST LIBERTY SAFES 01/02/02 22.99 MW OB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/02/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER pa~e 7 ~ED, JA/~ 02, 2002, 3:20 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 69243 #S064 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 3 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 264,443.91 Number of Checks Pro~essed: 143 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 G R A N D T O T A L 264,443.91 City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary December 31, 2001 Par Market Book % of Days to Y'I'M YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 24,744,362.76 24,744,362.76 24,744,362.76 18.70 1 I 3.478 3.526 Certificates of DepositJNeg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,515,908.09 1,515,000.00 1.15 180 147 1.950 1.977 Federal Agency Issues * Coupon 104,100,000.00 105,983,328.57 104.040,868.75 78.64 1,657 1,219 5.603 5.681 Treasu~ Securities - Coupon 2,000,000,00 2,007,500.00 1,995,937.50 1.51 731 30 6.396 6.485 Investments 132,359,362.76 134,251,099.42 132,296,t 69.01 t00.g0% 1,316 96.1 5..176 5.248 Cash and Accrued Interest Passpook/Chec~ing 2,134,657,73 2,134,657.73 2,134,657.73 1 1 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 4,152.78 4,152.78 Subtotal 2,138,810.51 2,138,810.51 Total Cas h and Investments .134,494,020.49 .136,389,909.93 .134,434,979.52 1,316 961 5.t 76 5.248 Total Earnings December 3'1 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 583,730.04 3,644,466.29 Average Daily Balance .133,247,227.76 .132,664,558.73 Effective Rate of Return 5..16% 5.45% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21,2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Deparlment. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-InteractJve Data Corporation pridng service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents Portfolio CITY CP ~Run PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V5.02f Date: 7:54 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2001 Avenge Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date ParValue Mar~etValue BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 24,744,362.76 24,744,362.76 24,744,382.76 3.526 3.478 1 Subtotal and Average 24,147,588.57 24,744,362.76 24,744,362.76 24,744,362.76 3.478 1 Certificates of DepositJNeg. - Bank 06050EB38 1116 BANK OF AMERICA 11/29/2001 1.515,000.00 1,515,908.09 1,515.000.00 1,950 1.950 147 05/28/2002 Subtutal and Average 1,518,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,908.09 1,515,000.00 ¶.950 t47 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/2711997 2,000,000.00 2,022,525.94 2,000,000,00 6.620 6.529 85 03/27/2002 31331RDX0 00996 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/17/1997 2,000,000.00 2,046,577.76 1,999,375.00 6.240 6.t62 197 07/17/2002 3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 2,063,191.83 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 370 01/06/2003 31331H6E2 t075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT hANK 01/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,068.125.00 2,000,000.00 5.730 5.652 1,119 01/24/2005 31331LHD3 1100 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,023,750.00 1,991,250.00 5.600 5.624 1,595 05/15/2006 31331LKE7 1107 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/14/2001 3,000.000.00 3,045,937.50 2,997,000.00 5.560 5.512 1,260 06/14/2005 31331LMP0 1109 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/16/2001 2.000.000.00 2,036.250.00 t.997,812.50 5.750 5.696 1,659 07/16/2006 31331LSG4 1112 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/29/200t 5,0~0,000.00 4,970,312.50 5,000,000.00 4.125 4.068 1,214 04/29/2005 31331LTQ1 1115 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/26/2001 4,000.000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 1,427 11/2812005 3133M2US4 01003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/06/1998 1,000,000.00 1,039,062.50 1,000.000.00 6.230 6,145 370 01/06/2003 3133M6NI=4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/08/1998 2,(X}0,000.00 2,083,750.00 2,000,000.00 5.530 5.454 706 12/06/2003 3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/21/1999 1,000,000.00 1,041,875.00 1,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 750 01/21/2004 3133M86L3 01043 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/23/1999 3,000,000.00 3,077,812.50 3,000,000.00 5.755 5.676 265 09/23/2002 3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,180,937.50 2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 898 06/17/2004 3133M96K3 01053 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/26/1999 2,000,000,00 2,042,500.00 1,996,875.00 6.480 6.428 909 06/26/2004 3133MARK7 1059 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/25/2000 2,000,000.00 2,014,375.00 1,999,687.50 7.000 6.910 420 02/26/2003 3133MBHV2 1062 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/26/2000 2,000,000.00 2,042,500.00 1.994,375.00 7.8g0 7.850 1,231 06/16/2005 3133MCX34 1076 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,105,000.00 2,997,187.50 5.760 5.707 1,119 01/24/2005 3133MFBP2 1103 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/30/2001 2,000,000.00 2,066,250.00 1,999,052.50 5.800 5.731 1,610 05/3012006 3133MF7E2 1105 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/0W2~01 2,000,000.00 2,065,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.750 5.671 1,617 06/06/2006 3133MGBV7 1110 FEDERAL HOME LOAN SANK 07/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,039,375.00 1,999,375,00 5.800 5.728 1,665 07124/2006 3133MJL81 1114 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/20/2001 3,100,000.00 3,094,187.50 3,098,450.00 4.250 4.207 1,235 05/20/2005 312923GH2 1078 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/14/2001 2,000,000.00 2,008,609.92 2,000,000.00 6.000 5.918 1,505 02/14/2006 312923MQ5 1081 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/2001 1,000,000.00 t,025,356.90 1,000,000.00 5.625 5.548 1.539 03/20/2006 312923MJ1 1082 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/21/2001 4,000,000.00 4,02~,403.81 4,000,000.00 5.700 5.622 1,540 03/21/2006 312923SM8 1086 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MOR~FG. CORP. 04/15/2001 4,000.000.00 4,091,635.74 4,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 1,560 04/10/2006 312923ZB4 1096 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/06/2001 6,000,000.00 6,115,715.33 6,000,000.00 5.520 5.444 1.588 05~6/2006 3t 2923ZY4 1098 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/09/2001 5,000,000.00 5,047.569.28 5,000,000.00 5.700 5,622 1,589 05/09/2006 Portfolio CITY City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2001 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Man, et Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity D=*. Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3t29248H7 1113 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/14/2001 3,000,0GO.00 2,947,220.76 2,997,187.50 4.150 4.118 1,413 11/14/2005 31364FG96 01018 FEDEPJU- NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,074,333.80 2,000,000.00 6.125 6.041 503 05/19/2003 31364KPT1 1065 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/06/2000 3,000,000.00 3,073,125.00 3,000,000.00 7.875 7.767 1,252 05/06/2005 31364KR36 1077 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/05/2~01 4,0~0,000.00 4,082,500.00 3,999,375.00 5.625 5.553 947 08/05/2004 31359MGV9 t079 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03~5/2001 3,000,000.00 3,011,250.00 3,000,000.00 5.450 5.374 772 02/12/2004 3136FOAL6 1085 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/04/2001 4,000,000.00 4,086,250.00 3,994,375.00 5.300 5.259 1,548 03/29/2006 3136FODW9 1088 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/11/2001 2.000,000.00 2,019,375.00 2.000,000.00 5.650 5.573 1,561 04/11/2006 3136FOEVO 1091 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/200t 2,000,000.00 2,020,625.00 1,999.200.00 5.750 5.680 1,567 04/17/2006 3136FOEW8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 3,000.000.00 3,077,812.50 2,997,000.00 5.510 5.457 1,567 04/17/2006 3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,070,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,604 05/24/2006 3136FORV6 1108 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/t 5/2001 2,000,000.00 2,035,000.00 1,998,750.00 5.750 5.685 1,646 07/05/2006 Subtotal and Average t05,137,642.94 t 04,100,000.00 105,983,328.57 104,040,868.75 5.603 1~19 Treasury Securities - Coupon 8128275X6 1058 TREASURY NOTE 01/31/2C~0 2,000,000.00 2,007,500.00 1,995,937.50 6.375 6.396 30 0t/31/2002 Subtotal and Average 1,995,937.50 2,000,000.00 2,007,500.00 1,995,937.50 6.396 30 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/23/1987 0.00 0.00 0.00 8000 8.219 0 01/01/2002 Subtotal and Average 58.58 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.000 0 Total Investments and Average 132,796~.27.59 132,359,362.76 134,251,099.42 132~96,169.01 5.176 961 Portfolio CiTY CP , D at e: 01/08/2002 - 17:54 PM (PRF_PM2) 8~m~Rept V5.02f City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash December 31, 2001 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Inveetment It issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Cash Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 2,134,657.73 2,134,657.73 2,134,657.73 2.000 1.973 1 Cash Subtotal and Average Balance 451,000.17 2,134,657.73 2,134,657,73 2,134,657,73 1 Accrued Interest et Purchase 4,152,78 4,152,78 Subtotal 2,138,810,51 2,138,810,51 Total Cash and Investments t33~.47,227.76 134,494,020.49 t36,389,909.93 t34,434,979.52 5.176 96t Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type Page December 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Sales/IdatuHfles Ending Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) Certificates of DeposiUNeg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Treasury Securities - Coupon Mortgage Backed Securities Po~folio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended November 30, 200"1 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Pavlne Aeent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment Distdct No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A' 1.70% $ 257,311.00 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.78 Reserve Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.70% 244,165.00 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.35 Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 1.70% 3,410.00 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.43 $~504~887.56 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.70% $ Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.04 1999 A (St) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.70% 581,643.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.63 Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.70% 1,092,688,00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.05 Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.70% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 1.70% 159.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.70 Residual Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.70% 216,153.00 Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.38 $ 1,890,644.80 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,395,632.36 * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~ i:~nancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 1/9~2002 1:31 PM R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N O I N E E R I N O D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor SUI~IEGT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 AND 10 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS 1139303-5300 AND 1140303-5300. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts 9 and 10 and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMD's) 9 and 10 are the two most recently established LMD's within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To date, no tracts in either LMD have been accepted that have City-maintained landscaping. It is estimated that the first of those tracts, a tract in LMD 9, will be accepted in March or April 2002. To maintain that site and others that are added later, a landscape and irrigation maintenance contract for those two LMD's must be in place. Engineer's estimate for LMD 9 is $8,000 for the last four months of this fiscal year. At build out, the Engineer's estimate for LMD 9 is $68,000. No additions are expected until fiscal year 02/03 for LMD 10. At build out, the Engineer's estimate for LMD 10 is $87,762. Respectfully submitted, Willi~m,/J. O'Neil C~tyxF. Ag~neer WJO:DG:mw Landscape Maintenance District 1(~ LEGEND 0 1 Miles Landscape Maintenance District 9 1 LEGEND 0 1 Miles RESOLUTION NO. OZ-OZ ~ A SOL ION OF CItY COWCm OF C TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 & 10 AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to maintain certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the maintenance of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 & 10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 3:00 P.M. ON Thursday, Februar~ 14, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts 9 & 10 in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked, "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 & 10". Please purchase and/or direct requests for plans and specs regarding the "Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts 9 & 10" project to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Counter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730-3801. $2 Resolution No. Page 2 of 4 A Pre-Bid Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such deternfinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: 1. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or 2. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to fiver or 3. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 4. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Resolution No. Page 3 of 4 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or fi:om the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be govemed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Resolution No. Page 4 of 4 Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a "Class "C-27" (Landscaping Contractor) license", in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld' (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 9 & 10 may be directed to: Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor 9153 Ninth Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4114 or FAX (909) 477-2731 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 16th day of January 2002. ADVERTISE ON: January 22, 2002 and January 29, 2002 [~ A N C h O C U CA M O N G A ]~ ffGINI~I~ING DE DAI~T~ENT DATE: January 16, 2002 TO:. Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Enginee~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM 400' NORTH OF CHURCH STREET TO 500' NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 11123035650/1292112 (DRAINAGE) AND 11763035650/1301176 (MEASURE I) RECOMMENDATION: It is rccommcnded that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of thc Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements from 400' North of Church Street to 500~ North of Base Line Road and approve thc Attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS: Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements scope of work in gcneral consists of, but not limited to, thc installation of a master plauncd storm drain with pertinent laterals and catch basins, street widening, pavement rehabilitation, rclocatiun of a water main and sewer main, installation of conercte curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, rock retaining walls, AC driveways, fences, street lights, traffic signal loops, re- striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from Drainage funds, Account No. 11123035650/1292112 and Measure 'T' funds, Account No. 11763035650/1301176. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of thc CEQA guidelines. Thc Engineer's estimate for Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements is $3,613,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 22, 2002, January 29, 2002, and February 12, 2002 with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 19, 2002. Respectfully submitted, ~ Wili'i~am"~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH HERMOSA AVENUE STORM .DRMN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (FROM 400':i: N. OF CHURCH STREET TO 500':t: N. OF BASE LINE ROAD) · ~PROJ~C3' ~. ~- -- ~~~___.i ..'~~ '~-- --' o~ ~ ' : ..L..~.._~.C! ._~_ ._ ~ CI~1'¥ 01,ViCINiTYRANCttO CUCAMONGAMAp RESOLUTION NO. O2 - 0 2 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE "HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM 400' NORTH OF CHURCH STREET TO 500' NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO KECEWE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSAI.S" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 19, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in RESOLUTION NO. January 16, 2002 Page 2 which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Deparlment of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 RESOLUTION NO. January 16, 2002 Page 3 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained fi.om the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or fi.om the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shail be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cueamonga for the construction of said work. RESOLUTION NO. January 16, 2002 Page 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and roles and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of peri ury, that the information being provided is tree and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 16th day of January, 2002. Publish Dates: January 22, 2002, January 29, 2002 and February 12, 2002 z/! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ( FROM: Diane Young, Records Coordinator ~o-'x,~ SUBJECT: Destruction of City Records RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representatives, the Department Heads and the City Attorney. DMY (Attachments as noted) RESOLUTION NO. 02-*** OZ7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the following departments and divisions have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; City Manager Code Enforcement City Clerk Risk Management Personnel Admin Svcs/Admin Admin Svcs/Treasury Library Finance M.I.S. Facilities MaintJYard Planning Building & Safety Community Services Engineering/Admin Engineering/Traffic & Design R.C.C.F. Business Licensing G.I.S. / Special Districts and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes: WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Resolution No. 02-*** Page 2 SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of January, 2002. Executed this 17th day of January, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk EXHIBIT 'A' Records Destruction Authorizations for the following Departments / Divisions City Manager City Clerk Code Enforcement Personnel Risk Management Admin Svcs./Admin Admin Svcs/Treasury Business Licensing Finance M.I.S. G.I.S. / Special Districts Facilities Maint./Yard Planning Building and Safety Community Services R.C.C.F. Engineering/Admin Engineering/Traffic & Design Library CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: City Manager (4122) Requestor: Donna Kendrena I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have been stored in the Administration Department and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records / Record Title Code from Records Retention Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.2 - Policies & Precedents All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2000 ,q 1300.3 - United Way Campaign Calendar year 1998 12050.1 - Cable TV & Radio (general) Calendar year 1998 ~12060.1 - Ambulance Sen, ice Operating Permits All that expired in 1990 13010.7 - Monthly Crime Reports Calendar year 1999 15010.1 - Inter-Governmental Agencies All where the City Official's term as a representative to the applicable agency ended in 1999 (57~ /7012.1 - Council/Commission Contact Forms Calendar year 1997 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) e Date Si~ature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: City Clerk (4126) Requestor: Debbie Adams I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have been stored in the City Clerk's Vault and office areas and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Record Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records / Title Code from Records Retention Schedule when Documents (Mo/Yr) applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 2050.2 - Dept'l. Budget Working Papers Calendar year 1999 3040.5 - Records Transfer Requests/Lists Calendar year 1999 6010.0 - Bids (Unsuccessful) Calendar year 1999 6020.1 - Contracts and Agreements All which were completed, terminated or expired in 1990. (Exception: those that have akeady been microfilmed will be retaIned on film media.) 6020.2 - Contracts Log All pages dated prior to 1/1/1981 6050.2 - Proof of Publication (except Ordinances) Calendar year 1999 7010.0 - City Council Agenda Packets Calendar year 2000 (after scanning) 7010.1 - Council Sub-Committee Agenda Packets Calendar year 2000 (after scanning) 7010.2 - Task Force Agenda Packets Calendar year 2000 (after scanning) 7010.3 - Public Safety Commission Agenda Packets Calendar year 2000 (after scanning) 7010.4 - RC Community Foundation Agenda Packets Calendar year 2000 (after scanning) 7010.5 - Environmental Mgmt Comm Agendas Calendar year 2000 (after scanning) 7010.9 - Audio Tapes of Council meetings Calendar year 1996 7020.0 - Struts of Economic Interests Log Calendar year 1991 7020.1 - Election Reference Papers Calendar year 1999 7020.2 - Campaign Stmts - Unsuccessful Calendar year 1996 7020.9 - Oaths of Office All whose term expired In 1996 6040.5 - Claims/Supoenas Log All pages dated 1999 7040.8 - Smuts of Econ Interest (Form 700) Calendar year 1994 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) ~ ~g~ature(////(~O~Date/4zf/0 [ Sigfi~ture"~ ~ ~7 ']-°~ -~?Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date q7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Personnel Requestor: Chris Pittenger I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code fi.om Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 5020.5 - Salary & Classification Surveys All that became inactive prior to January, 2000 5030.3 - Job Descriptions All that were superseded prior to January, 2000 '~ent .~roval "-~'~,~-~'~J)-O/ City Attorney Approval (if required) Jl' ]-d Date Silage Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Admin Services/Treasury Requestor: Sandy Ramirez I have inspected the following records/documents and reco,~9~end/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Centerlli~hre not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 4030.9 - Wire Transfer Confirmations Calendar year 1999 7040.5 - Finance Vault Key Log Calendar year 1999 Department Approva! City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature (/Date Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Finance Requestor: Tamara Layne I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, so they are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents 0Vlo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 4011.6 - Master Chart of Accounts All that have been superseded prior to 1/1/2000 4030.7 - Dept. Sign-offList for Payroll Calendar year 1999 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature L~ ~/" Date Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Deslroyed by: .Signature Date *.5'/) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Purchasing (Dept 4153) Requestor: Dawn Haddon I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, so are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope Of the annual Advantage-generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code fi.om Records Retention Records / Documents 0Vlo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence All prior to 1/1/2000 1020.2 - Vendor Files All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2000 12050.7 - Telecommunications Devices All prior to 1/1/2000 4070.5 - WMBE Statistical Reports All prior to 1/1/1992 6010.1 - Bids - Unsuccessful All prior to 1/1/2000 6010.5 - Purchasing Policy & Procedures All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2000 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature Date ~qgnature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: M.I.S. Requestor: Robert Bowery I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City=s Records Center, so are not listed in the City=s Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records Record Title Code from Records Retention / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Ail thru December 31, 1999 14041.0 - Service/Help Desk Requests All that became inactive/resolved prior to 1/1/2000 2040.3 - Hardware/Software Acquisition Requests All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2000 2040.4 - Hardware Inventory All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2000 2040.5 - Software Inventory All that became inactive pr/or to 1/1/2000 2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers All thru December 31, 1999 5010.0 - Monthly Systems Backups All thru December 31, 1999 (to be reused) 5010.2 - Year-end System Backups All thru December 31, 1999 (to be reused) 5010.8 - Network Config. Maps/Plans All that were superseded pr/or to 1/1/2000 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature /' Date Si~nature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Risk Management Requestor: George Rivera I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the Cit,fs Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 5080.3 - Pre~Empl. Physicals (non-hires) All thru December 31, 1999 5100.5 - Motor Vehicle Reports (MVR's) All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2002 Department A;roval" ,, City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature..~ Date Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Business Licensing Requestor: Dawn Bates I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents 0Vlo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 1020.5 - Accounts Registers All that were superseded prior to January, 2000 1020.6 - Renewal Registers Calendar year 1999 12060.4 - Taxicab Operations Files All that became inactive prior to January, 2000 4020.6 - License and Permit Accounts All that became inactive prior to January, 2000 4020.7 - Massage Permits / Permit Fees All that became inactive prior to January, 2000 Department ~,pproval ' City Attorney Approval (if required) Si_~natfire Date ' Si~at~re Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date ' ~ CITY OF RANCHO cucAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: G.I.S. Requestor: Ingrid Bruce I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 1999 ./~artment Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) ature {~/ l~ate/ signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Special Districts Requestor: Ingrid Bruce I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that theybe destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code fxom Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 1999 e artment Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) -//Si~ature /~ - I~ate/ ~gnature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Admin Services/Admin Requestor: Pam Mara I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 12050.5 - Mail Processing Calendar year 1999 City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature Date S~gnature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Planning Requestor: Brad Buller I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 - H.~0LD IJ~lllk 12/2004 2050.2 - Dept'l. Budget Working Papers Calendar year 1999 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Building & Safety (4373) Requestor: Linda Courtney I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have been stored in the Administration Department and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records / Record Title Code from Records Retention Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 3020.3 - Utilities Release Log Calendar year 1999 3020.4 - Inspection Staff stical Summaries Calendar year 1991 3030.1 - Applications for Temporary Utilities Calendar year 1999 3030.3 - Complaints & Inspection Requests All that became inactive or were resolved in 1999 3030.4 - Applications for Plan Duplication Calendar year 1999 3030.5 - Misc. Applications Calendar year 1999 8021.1 - Plan Ck/Bldg Permit Expiration or Exten- Calendar year 1998 sion letters (Recheck Letters) 8050.1 - Code Violation Correspondence All that became inactive or were resolved in 1998 8050.3 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 8050.4 - Structure Abatement Notices All that became inactive or were resolved in 1998 8070.3 - Bldg. Inspection Reports & Files All that became inactive in 1998 8070.4 - Daily Inspection Records Calendar year 1999 Departm93a~proval City Attorney Approval (if required) // / - Date ~'ignature Date / Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Engineering (Traffic/Design) (Dept 4639) Requestor: Sue Cooper I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, so are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage-generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence All prior to 1/1/2000 11100.4 - Streets & Highways Master Plan All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2000 (to be transferred to City archives - Larry Henderson) 11411.0 - Speed Zone Studies All that were superseded prior to 1/1/1992 11610.2 - Street Maps All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2000 (to be transferred to City archives - Larry Henderson) 11610.3 - Signal System Maps All that were superseded prior to 1/1/2000 11620.1 - Traffic Signal Maintenance All prior to 1/1/1999 2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers All prior to 1/1/2000 7030.8 - Traffic Counts All that were superseded prior to 1/1/1999 8020.4 - Overload Permits All that were expired/completed/terminated prior to 1/1/2000 8060.2 - Multi-year projections for Cap Improve. All prior to 1/I/2000 (4~rtment Approval,? City Attorney Approval (if required) Da'te ~gnature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Engineering (Admin) (Dept 4637) Requestor: Diane Whyte I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center, so arc not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annna] Advantage-generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applidable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence All prior to 1/1/2000 11101.8 - Street Vacations All that were approved prior to 1/1/2000 11700.9 - Flood Plain (FEMA) All that were superseded prior to 1/1/1992 2050.2 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers All prior to 1/1/2000 ,~.._ent Approval~ City Attorney Approval (if required) ~(/~ //~/~'Oc~ S~gnature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Community Services Requestor: Melissa Morales I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code fi.om Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 -Dept'l. General Correspondence All thru 12/31/1999 1020.3 - Programs All thru 12/31/1997 1020.4 - Projects All that completed/terminated prior to I / I / 1998 1020.5 - Special Events All thru 12/31/1997 14010.6 - Scholarship Applications All thru 12/31/1999 14020.3 - Recreation Class Schedule All thru 12/31/1999 (1 original sent to Archives) 16010.7 - Use of City Facilities All thru 12/31/1999 2050.2 - Dept'l. Budget Working Papers All thru 12/31/1999 5030.5 - Volunteer Applications / Reports All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2000 7010.3 - Advisory Council Agendas All thru 12/31/1999 (to be scanned, then recycled) 7012.9 - Audio Tapes All thru 12/31 / 1999 (to b e reused) ~eT~ ent ! I ~'{ City Attorney Approval (if required) Signatm Date Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date ~ 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: R.C.C.F. Requestor: Karen Silhanek I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence All thru December 31, 1999 1020.3 - Programs/Projects/Events All that became inactive prior to 1/1/1997 7012.9 - Audio Tapes All thru December 31, 1999 Depp/~ne~ ~l~roval City Attorney Approval (if required) SignatUre Date Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Code Enforcement Requestor: Bill Makshanoff I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 8020.8 - Temporary Use & Temporary Sign All that became inactive prior to 1/1/2000 Permits /~//?~//~ffartment Approval__ City Attorney Approval (if required) Si~ature ' ' ( D~te Si~ure Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date · ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Facilities Maint/Yard Requestor: Julie Ungashick I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020.1 - General Correspondence Calendar year 1999 14041.1 - Vehicle Operators Daily Checklist ~alendar yea~1998 ~ Iqqq 14041.2 - Employee Activity Sheets Calendar year 1999 16010.8 - Pesticide Application Forms Calendar year 1998 16010.9 - Monthly Pesticide Use Reports Calendar year 1998 6010.4 - Dept'l Budget Working Papers Calendar year 1999 6060.3 - Equipt. Maintenance Records All that became inactive prior to January, 2000 ~pproval////~ g~/~/ City Attorney Approval (if required) /- Signature ~ / ~ate S~at~e Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Librar~ Requestor: Vivian Garcia I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center but are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 11300.1 - Donation records All thru December 31, 1997 11800.2 - Public Services & Relations records All thru December 31, 1997 11801.0 - Public Inquiries & Complaints All thru December 31, 1997 4012.3 - Revenue Files .., 0c~ ~ All thru December 31, 1999 5030.0 - Library Board Agendas ~ All thru December 31, 1997 5030.5 - Volunteer Program records All that became inactive prior to 1/1/1998 7041.1 - Fines Collected All thru December 31, 1997 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Si--taturegn v - Date S(~nature ' Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date Notification N,,mher 90 ~ Destruction Notification Report 11/01/2091. ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga 15:28:51 ~ Unknown 4122 CITY MANAGER Bill to Namer 4122 Records Coordinator: KENDRENA, DONNA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2015 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo Justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X)/Code Box ~,~her Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# hred 2182 1020.1 ~eneral Correspondence 01/01/1996 12/$1/1996 12/31/2001 15-01-03 3 ox Contents: Gen'l Correspondence (1996) FOLDER Description i 1996 Chron Files 01/01/1996 12/31/1996 General Correspondence Shred 2578 11630.4 Parking Citations 09/01/1998 06/30/1999 06/30/2001 06-03-03 2 ~ Box Contents: Parking Citations (Spcl Cases 9/98-6/99) E = Excluded Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 2 ( Excluding boxes on hold Or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) II/'z~m/ l/~ ~p,.~.~t~"~ I / / I ~ ~-~ I~/~ /~- I ~, ~'~'~ I Date ~)uane~'~r, A~st.' to City M~r Date Jack Lam, Ci-ty Manager Date J- M~arkman, City Attorney Page 1 Notification Number 10/25/2001 91 Destruction Notification Report 16:52:20 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4124 PERSONNEL Bill to Name: 4124 Records Coordinator: Chris Pittenger Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2411 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Shred 1915 5090.3 Personnel Recruitment 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 10/31/2001 11-02-01 4 Box Contents: Personnel Recruitments FOLDER Description i Asst. RDA Analyst 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 2 Associate Planner 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 3 Community Services Director 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 4 Finance Specialist 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 5 Maint. worker (in-house) 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 6 Office Specialist I (Admin/RDA) 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 7 Office Specialist II (City Yard) 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 8 Office Specialist II (Building) 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 9 Planning Aide 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment 10 Planning Technician 06/01/1998 10/31/1998 Personnel Recruitment Shred 1918 5090.3 Personnel Recruitment 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 11/30/2001 11-02-01 FOILER Description 1 ACcount clerk {inhouse part time) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 2 Library Page I & II 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 3 Library Asst. 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 4 Librarian 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 5 Maint Tech (9/98) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 6 Maint Tech (2/98) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 7 Management Intern - Engineering 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment Date C~ris Pittenge~, Pets Svc Coot Da-re Larry Temple, Adm Svcs Dir Date J. ~arkman, City Attorney ~, Page i Notification Number 91 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 16:52:20 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4124 PERSONNEL Bill to Name: 4124 Records Coordinator: Chris Pittenger Mail Code~ Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2411 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 8 program Specialist (roller hockey referee) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 9 Program specialist (contract classes) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 10 Program Specialist (contract classes / rentals) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 11 Records Coord 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 12 Recreation Attendant (cashier) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 13 Recreation Attendant (playschool aide) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 14 Recreation Asst. (indoor soccer) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 15 Recreation Asst. (building coverage) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Persorn~el Recruitment 16 Recreation Asst. (contract classes) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 17 Recreation Asst. Hockey 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 18 Recreation Asst. clerical/bldg. 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Persorknel Recruitment 19 Recreation Asst. clerical 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 20 Recreation Coord (Sr. Center / human sea-vices) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 21 Recreation Leader (human services) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 22 Recreation Leader teen programs 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 23 Recreation Leader teen 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 24 Recreation Supervisor 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 25 Secretary (city clerk) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recln/itment 26 Secretary (plar~ning) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment 27 Sr. Plans Examiner (Bldg & Fire) 02/01/1998 11/30/1998 Personnel Recruitment Date Chris Pittenger,& ~ers Svc Coor D~te La~f~ T~p~e, Adm Svcs Dir Date J. Markman, City Attorney -. Page Eligible'Boxes on Hold = 0 (~ Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 '~'~ Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 2 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Notification Number 92 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 16:52:30 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4140 Ada%in Services / Treasur~ Bill to Name: 4140 Admin Services / Treasury Records Coordinator: RAMIREZ, SANDY Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2405 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box ~her Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 0_. S~red 2291 4030.8 BAMTRAC 01/01/1994 09/30/1994 09/30/2001 03-01-01 2 Box Contents: BAMTRAC - 1994 E = Excluded Eligible Boxes on Hold -- 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department -- 1 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date "Sa~y Remirez, M~mt An~ II Date Larry ~_~, Adm Svcs Dir Date J. Markmen, City Attorney Page i 93,, 16~52:41 C~t City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4151 FINANCE Bill to Name~ 4151 Records Coord£nator~ LAYRE, TAMARA Mail Codel Phone~ (909)477-2700 ext,2430 The following records ere due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH'box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an edd£t£onal 6 months, provide a memo just£fy£ng the hold. Return the ent£re list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record T£tle Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Rnding Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# i ,Shred 2159 4050.6 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) 09/20/1996 09/11/1996 09/11/2001 03-03-03 2 BOX Contents~ A/P Canceled Checks FOLDER Description 1 Check #'s 104900 thru 109799 03/20/1996 09/11/1S96 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA 2 Dated '3/20/1996 thru 9/11/1996 03/20/1996 09/11/1996 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA Contentsl Payroll Canceled Checks (4/96 - 10/96) FOLDER Description 1 check numbers 108300 114199 04/04/1996 10/03/1996 Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA Shred 2395 4040.5 Payroll Deductions & Authorization 07/01/1996 12/31/2001 15-03-02 16 12/31/1996 BOX Contents~ Payroll Deduction Register (7/96 -12/96) - {l~5hred 2397 4040.2 · Payroll Register 07/01/1996 09/10/1996 09/30/2001 15-03-02 16 Box Contents~ Payroll Register (7/96 - 9/96) Shred 2368 4040.2 Payroll Register 09/01/1996 12/31/1996 12/31/2001 07-06-03 5 Da~e T~ara La~'.,)'~ifianc~ Offer Date La~~~s D~ Da~e J. Marian, Ci~ A~orney Page i 93 ~ Dest~cti0n N0=l£1ca=10n ~ep0r= 16:$2~41 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4151 FINANCE Bill to Namez 4151 Records Coordinator~ LAYRE, TAMARA Mail Code~ Phonez (909)477-2700 ext,2430 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code EoxNumber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location S~ace# Box Contents~ Payroll Reglster (9/96 - 12/96) i Shred 1922 4040.8 Time Cards 05/26/1986 08/04/1986 08/04/2001 02-02-02 6 %Shred 1919 ~0%0.9 Time Cards 08/18/1996 10/27/1986 10/27/2001 02-02-02 2 Box Contents~ Payroll Time Cards (8/18/98 - 10/27/86) 2421 4041.2 hred 2454 4041.2 Vacation a Sick Leave Reports 01/01/1997 12/~1/1987 12/31/2001 18-02-02 9 , ~ ,.~.,~.~ Date =. ~ar~a~, city Attorney Page 2 2O~u~u~ aua~=~ Destruction Not£flcation Report ~0/&~/&uv~ 93 16~52=41 ~ city of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4151 FINANCE Bill to Name= 4151 Records Coordinator~ LAYNE, TAMARA Mail Code~ Phone~ (909)477-2700 ext,2430 The following records ere due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next ~o BACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bo=tom of EACH page. If you want a box held for-an additional 6 months, provide l a memo Justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Des=roy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box N~Ber Code (Box Conhents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# BOX Contents~ Workers Con~ Report (Jan-Dec 1997) hred 1165 404Z.0 W-2~ s 01/01/1987 12/31/1991 12/31/2001 05-03-01 2 FOLDER Description i W-2'S FEDEPJ%L & STATE QUARTERLY RETURRS 1987-1991 01/01/1987 12/31/1991 W-2' S Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted - 0 Boxes ~o be Destroyed for this Department = 11 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date Tamara Layns, Finance Offcr Date Larr~.~p~ A~ Sv~ Dir Date J. Markm~n, City Attorney Page 3 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:16 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SA/~CHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then ei~n a date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nove~er 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Scan/Recyc 2561 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP,s) 07/01/1988 05/31/1996 05/31/2000 05-01-03 4 BOX Contents: CUP's FOLDER Description 1 CUP 90-17; CUP 90-18 (Ryder Truck); CUP 90-25; CUP90-36 (Dimension Cable); 07/01/1988 05/31/1996 Conditional Use Permits ( 2 CUP 90-38 (Howard Spunt); CUP 90-40 (Sierra Vista Baptist); 07/01/1988 05/31/1996 Conditional Use Permits ( 3 CUP 94-30 (McDonalds); CUP 95-29 (The Wild Grape Too) 07/01/1988 05/31/1996 Conditional Use Permits ( 4 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 07/01/1988 05/31/1996 Conditional Use Permits ( Scan/Recyc 2559 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP,s) 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 11/30/2000 06-02-01 1 Box Contents: CUP's (1993) FOLDER Description 1 CUP 93-25 (Mecca); CUP 93-27 (Roller/Ice Rink); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 2 CUP 93-28 (Indoor Racquetball); CUP 93-29 (Batting Cages); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 3 CUP 93-26 (Liquor Deli); CUP 93-30 (Martial Arts Studio); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 4 CUP 93-31 (Masi Health Club); CUP 93-32 (Masi Billiards); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 5 CUP 93-33 (Teal Coffee Sales); CUP 93-34 (Florist); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 6 CUP 93-35 (Nail/Hair Salon); CUP 93-36 (Cleaners); CUP 93-37 (An Hospital); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 7 CUP 93-38 (Wilkinson); CUP 93-39 (Final Score); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 8 CUP 93-40 & Env Assess (Gymnastics & karate studio); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 9 CUP 93-41 (Transamerica); CUP 93-42 (Church of Christ); CUP 93-43 (Martinez); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 10 CUP 93-44 (Gallarzo); CUP 93-45 (Hildenbrand); CUP 93-46 (Flores); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 11 CUP 93-47 (Sam's Place); CUP 93-48 (Shop n Go); CUP 93-49 Mod#2 (Western Dev); 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 12 CUP 93-50 (Cassaro); CUP 93-51 (Coco Storage) 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits 13 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 07/01/1993 11/30/1996 Conditional Use Permits "/ I I I Page i Notification Number 10/25/2001 94 Destruction Notification Report 17:24:16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: S~.NCHBZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909}477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to BACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space~ Scan/Recyc 2243 8020.2 Conditional Use Pez~/ts (CUP.s) 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 07/31/2001 06-01-03 4 Box Contents: CUP.s (8/90 - 7/97) FOLDER Description I Mod to CUP 85-14 - Rancho Technology Center 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 2 CUP 82-12 - Mod - Meritor Academy Schools 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 3 Mod to CUP 89-23 - Rancho Cucamonga RDA 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 4 CUP 94-09 - Petrossi 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 5 CUP 94-08 - Babe's 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 6 Mod to CUP 89-23 - Rancho Cucamonga RDA 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 7 CUP 94-05 - BSW Int'l - NEC Haven/Foothill 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 8 CUP 94-05 Mod - Discovery Zone 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 9 CUP 94-06 New Life Fellowship 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 10 CUP 93-22 Davies 00/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 11 CUP 92-21 Calvary Chapel of Rancho Cucamonga 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 12 CUP 93-07 Levi, Billard Hall - SWC Foothill/Pomona 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 13 CUP 90-29 New service station - NWC East Ave/Sase Line 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits 14 * * * * Scanned June, 2001 * * * * 08/01/1990 07/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits Scan/Recyc 2484 8020.2 Conditional Use Pera~ts (CUP'S) 01/01/1989 12/31/1997 12/31/2001 11-02-02 6 Box Contents: ~eological Reports FOLDER Description 1 *** volume 1'** (CUP 85-25, TT 13476, TT 13650, TT 12844, TT 12590, 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( 2 TT 9454, TT 12895, CUP 87-26, TT 12592, TT 11606) 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( Date J. Markman, City Attorney Page 2 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:16 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~'~ Unknown 4333 PLANNINO DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, OAIL Mall Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext.4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo Justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space~ 3 *** Volume 2 *** (TT 12376, TT 10210, TT 11626, TT 12902, TT 12237, 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( 4 TT 10277, TT 13316, TT 10080) 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( 5 *** Volume 3 *** (VTT 14475, CUP 90-20, CUP 92-18, TT 12659, 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( 6 DR 78-57, TT 13527, CUP 97-09) 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( 7 * * * * Scanned June, 2001 * * * * 01/01/1983 12/31/1997 Conditional Use Permits ( ] Scan/Recyc 2558 2031.1 Development Code 09/01/1987 01/31/1993 01/91/1993 05-01-03 BOX Contents: Devpt Code Amends FOLDER Description I DCA 91-01 (Compact Parking); DCA 91-02 (City); DCA 91-04 (City); 09/01/1987 01/31/1993 Development Code 2 DCA 91-05; DCA 87-02; DCA 92-01 (Shop crt/City of RC) 09/01/1987 01/31/1993 Development Code 3 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 09/01/1987 01/31/1993 Development Code ] Shred 1699 1020.1 ~en,1 Correspondence 01/02/1996 12/31/1996 **HOLD** 12/91/1998 04-02-09 1 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 07/15/1999 To: Gall Sanchez FOLDER Description 1 JANUARY 1996 LETTERS AND MEMORAk~DUM 01/02/1996 12/31/1996 Gen'l Correspondence 2 THROUGH 01/02/1996 12/31/1996 Gen'l Correspondence 3 DECEMBER 1996 LETTERS AND MEMORANDUM 01/02/1996 12/31/1996 Gen'l Correspondence Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24~16 City of Rancho C~/camonga Unknown 4333 PL~--~ING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext,4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. if you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Ahnnber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ~.rchive 2576 2030.3 General Plans & Amendments 07/01/1986 03/81/1894 03/31/1896 07-02-02 / BOX RECORD TITLE #2030.3 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 NECO~D TITLE #2030.3 ON HOLD / BOX Contents: Gen'l Plan ~ends FOLDER Description 1 Potential "OR" GPA "86" 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment 2 GPA 91-01A (Planning Network); GPA 91-02B; GPA 91-03A - M; 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & ~aendment 3 GPA 91-04A (Air Quality); GPA 92-01 (City of RC); GPA 92-02A-8; 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment 4 GPA 93-01A (Wheatley) 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment 5 *** Needs to be Scal~ned *** 07/01/1986 03/31/1994 General Plans & Amendment Recycle 1839 6020.5 Grants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 12/31/1996 17-01-02 4 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 TO: Gall Sanchez FOLDER Description i CDBG ~MINISTRATION 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 2 E~n;IHONMENTAL P~EVIEWS 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 3 NEEDS ASSESSMENTS 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 4 PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 5 FINAL STATEMENTS 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 6 GP~/~TEE PERFOPJ~%NCE REPORT 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 7 FAIR HOUSING PROgrAM 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDB0 8 S.W. CUC;~4ONGA STREET IMPROVEMEB~ 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG 9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGPJ%M 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG) 10 GP~FFITI REMOVAL 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG) I It'/ / (?:,--.I Date Date J. Markman, City Attorney ~rad ~r, ~ Planner Page 4 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PL~/~NiNG DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext.4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 11 HOUSING REHABILITATION 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG) 12 WILLDAN CONTRACT 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG) 13 SENIOR SHARED HOUSING PROGRAM 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG) 14 CONSULT~/~T CONTRACT 89-90 01/01/1989 12/31/1991 Grants (other than CDBG) Recycle 1834 4020.5 Grants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1991 12/S1/1992 **HOLD** 12/31/1997 17-01-02 5 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 To: Gall Sanchez FOLDER Description 1 JAMES BROWN 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 2 W. LEIPZIGER 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 3 MACYS MOBILE HOMES 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 4 MOBILE REMODIERS 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 5 LEWIS & CLARK COHST 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 6 B & D SPECIALTIES 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants {other than CDBG 7 CATHY BOATRIGBT 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 8 CLARK CVRDELIA 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 9 JEAN KILGO 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 10 MARGARET BUTLER 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 11 FRANCES GLOVER 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grai%ts (other than CDBG 12 IRENE NELSON 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 13 SHIRLEY ROWLAND 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 14 ANNA SMITH 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG Date J. ~Markma~, City Attorney Page 5 Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 ~ 94 17=24=16 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Eill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 15 EDNA BACHSTEIN 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 16 ELIZABETH BEAUCF~P 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 17 BETTY BUNCH 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 18 WILLIAM NEARY 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 19 MARGARET BLACK 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 20 ALVINA GUTIERREZ 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 21 ALVIN KILBEY 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 22 ANN MCNALLY 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 23 MICHAEL NOVACK 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 24 LAURANCE ATEN 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 25 MARC CHARBONNEAU 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG Recycle 1835 4020.5 Grants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 **HOLD** 12/31/1997 17-01-01 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 TO: Gail Sanchez FOLDER Description 1 91-92 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORTS 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 2 CDEG ADMINISTRATION 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 4 PRELIMINARY & FINAL STATEMENTS 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 5 NEEDS ASSESSMENT 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 6 HOME IMPROVEMENT 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 7 NHEEL CHAIR R2%MPS 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG Date Page Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PL;~NNIN~ DIVISION Rill to Na/ne: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, ~AIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box N~mher Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 8 S.W. CUCD240NGA STREETS 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG} 9 FAIR HOUSING 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG) 10 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER JUSTIFICATION 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG) 11 GRAFFIT REMOVAL 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG) 12 EISTORIC PRESERVATION 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grits other than CDBG) 13 L~/~DLORD/TE/~/~T MEDIATION 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG) 14 NEIGEBORHOOD CENTER 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG) 19 SIDEWALK GRI~rDING 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDEG) 16 SIERRA MADRE ARROW TO 9TH 01/01/1991 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG) ] Recycle 1840 4020.5 Srants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 **HOLD** 12/91/1997 17-01-01 4 / HOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 To: Gall Sanchez FOLDER Description 1 ~/ 90-06 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 2 MH 90-08 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 3 SF 90-20 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 4 MH 91-08 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 5 ~H 91-11 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 6 MH 91-12 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 7 MH 91-13 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 8 MH 92-01 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG) 9 ~ 92-02 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDEG} Date--~'-~r,'~ B~re ~Planner -I /~; I ,.~ ~"~"8 Date J. ~arkman, City Attorney Page 7 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report ~ 94 17:24:16 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 pLAITNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCNEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box N%unber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 10 MM 92-03 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants (other than CDBG 11 MH 92-04 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 12 SF 92-04 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 13 MM 92-06 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 14 MM 92-12 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 15 MM 92-14 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 16 MH 92-20 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG 17 MH 92-21 01/01/1990 12/31/1992 Grants other than CDBG Recycle 1838 4020.5 Grants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 **HOLD** 12/31/1998 17-01-02 3 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 TO: Gail Sanchez FOLDER Description 1 RICHARD CASTEEL 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 2 CASTEEL FOLLOW UP FILE 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 3 SF 91-02 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 4 MH 92-07 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 5 ~q 92-09 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 6 MM 92-11 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other th~m CDBG 7 SF 92-11 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 8 MM 92-13 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDB~ 9 MM 93-03 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG 10 MM 93-04 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants other than CDBG Page 8 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:16 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, ~AIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 11 MR 93-06 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG) 12 MR 93-11 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG) 13 MR 93-11 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG) 14 SF 93-17 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG) 15 SF 93-19 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG) 16 MH 93-22 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG) Recycle 1836 4020.9 Grants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1990 12/31/1999 **HOLD** 12/31/2000 17-01-01 6 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 TO: Gall Sanchez FOLDER Description i ANNA 0PPERMAN 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 2 JO~ LAFEVER 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDEG 3 PHILIP CONFER 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 4 ELIZA RAMIREZ 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDB( 5 EDDIE LUGO 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDB( 6 MR 90-01 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG 7 MR 90-03 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 8 MR 90-05 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 9 MR 90-07 01/01/1990 12/31/1993 Grants (other than CDBG 10 BID PACKAGE #2 FILE 90-10 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 11 MR 91-01 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 12 MR 91-04 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG I/'/a'7/~/ ~=r~er, Ci~Planner/B I//-~ / OD I ~-~'/'~ I Date Date J~- Markman, City Attorney Page 9 Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 ~ 94 17:24=16 O< City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name= 4333 Records Coordinator= SANCHEZ, ~AIL Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=4327 l The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to BACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 13 MH 91-05 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) . 14 MH 91-06 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) 15 MH 91-10 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) 16 MH 92-05 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG} 17 MH 92-08 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) 18 MH 92-15 01/01/1990 12/31/1999 Grants (other than CDBG) 19 MH 92-16 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) 20 MH 93-08 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) 21 MH 95-06 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) 22 MH 95-13 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) Recycle 1837 4020.5 Grants (other than CDBG) 01/01/1990 12/91/1995 **HOLD** 12/31/2000 17-01-02 6 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 TO: C. ail Sanchez FOLDER DesCription I MH 90-04 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 2 MH 90-09 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 3 MH 90-10 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 4 MH 90-91 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Gra~ts (other than CDBG 5 SF 91-15 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 6 MH 92-19 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 7 MH 92-23 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG 8 M~ 92-22 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG Date Date /~r~ B~li~e~ Cit~Planner J. Markman, City Attorney Page 10 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:17 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~O Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone= (909)477-2700 ext,4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to ~ be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide la memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-~her 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 9 MH 93-01 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants Dther than CDBG) 10 MH 93-02 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants Dther than CDBG) 11 MH 93-04 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants Dther than CDBG) 12 MH 93-05 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants ~ther than CDBG) 13 MH 93-14 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 14 MH 93-15 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 15 MH 93-16 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 16 MI4 93-32 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 17 MH 94-05 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 18 MH 94-12 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 19 MH 94-14 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 20 MH 95-01 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 21 MH 95-10 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 22 MH 95-11 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants other than CDBG) 23 MH 95-17 01/01/1990 12/31/1995 Grants (other than CDBG) Scan/Recyc 1923 7010.2 Planning Con~ntsson Agendas 01/10/1996 12/11/1996 12/11/2001 05-01-03 1 Box Contents: Planning Connn/ssion Agendas - 1996 FOLDER Description 1 ** Need to scan before destruction ** 01/10/1996 12/11/1996 Planning Commisson Agenda Date /Bradder, ~%~ Planner ' Date J. Markman, City Attorney Page 11 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report ~ 94 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator= SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone~ (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-mher 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Scan/Recyc 1727 8021.0 Si~n permits 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 **HOLD** 12/31/1999 03-02-03 5 / BOX ON HOLD / *HOLD* Placed on this box Date: 01/01/1999 To: Gail Sanchez FOLDER Description 1 1988 SIGN PERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 2 1989 SIGN pERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 sign Permits 3 1990 SIGN PERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 4 1991 SIGN pERMIT LO~S 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 5 1992 SIGN PERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 6 1993 SIGN PERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign permits 7 1994 SIGN PERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 8 1995 SIGH PERMIT LOGS 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 9 *******MICROFIL~4ED ON 02/12/98'***** 01/01/1988 12/31/1995 Sign Permits 2547 2030.5 Specific Plans & Co--unity Plans 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 **HOLD** 07/91/1999 03-02-02 4 Scan/Recyc / BOX RECORD TITLE 92030.5 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TITLE %2030.5 ON HOLD / Box Contents: Ind' 1 Specific Plan Amends FOLDER Description i ISPA 90-04 (City of R.C.) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 2 ISPA 91-01 (Compact Parking) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 3 ISPA 91-02 & Environ Assess (Recycling Uses) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 4 ISPA 90-01 (Barmakian) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 5 ISPA 90-02 (City of R.C.) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 6 ISPA 90-03 (City of R.C.) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit Date // ad er, Plan=er Date J. ar an, City Attorney Page 12 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report 94 17:24:17 ~ city of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PL~NNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records ere due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying' the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 7 ISPA 92-02 (Jack Masi) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 8 ISPA 96-01 (GPA 96-01A) (Wohl) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 9 ISPA 94-03 (Streamlining) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 10 ISPA 91-03 & Environ Assess {Stenton Buffalo Ptnrs) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 11 ISPA 91-04 & Environ Assess (City of B.C.) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 12 ISPA 91-05 (City of E.C.) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 13 ISPA 91-06 (Howard Thompson) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 14 ISPA 92-01 (City of R.C.) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 15 ISPA 95-02 (GPA 95-02A) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 16 ISPA 95-01 (Northtown Devpt Corp) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 17 ISPA 94-04 (CCWD) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 18 ISPA 94-01 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 19 ISPA 93-01 (Wang) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communlf 20 ISPA 93-03 (General Dynamics) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 21 ISPA 94-02 (Masi Partners) 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 22 ISPA 93-04 (Arical Properties} 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit 23 *** Need to Scan *** 05/01/1987 07/31/1995 Specific Plans & Communit Scan/Becyc 2562 2030.5 Specific Plans & Co~;nunity Plans 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 **HOLD** 05/31/2001 06-02-01 2 / BOX RECORD TITLE 92030.5 ON HOLD / FOLDER #1 RECORD TITLE #2030.5 ON HOLD / Page 13 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report 94 17:24:17 ~ city of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to N~e: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code~ Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-mher 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box l~,mher Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# FOLDER Description 1 ENSP 90-01 - Phasing Plan; FSPA 90-01 A-C; ENSP 90-01 - Contract; 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit 2 FSPA 90-01 - city of RC; ESPA 90-02 - City of RC; FSPA 90-02 - City of RC; 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit 3 FSPA 90-03 (Group 66 Ptnr); FSPA 90-04 (Watson CO); 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit 4 FSPA 91-02; ESPA 91-02 (City of RC); FSPA 91-03; ESPA 91-03; 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit 5 Env Assess FBSPA 91-01 (City of RC); 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit 6 ESPA 92-01 (City of RC); ESPA 93-01; FBSP 93-01 (Steve Seeley); 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit 7 ENSPA 94-01 & ESPA 94-01 & FBSP 94-01 (Streamlining); 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Comm~it 8 FBSP 94-02 (OAS); FBSP 96-01; ESPA 96-01 (Diversified) 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & CC~amunit 9 *** Weeds to be Scanned *** 10/01/1986 05/31/1997 Specific Plans & Communit Scan/Recyc 2530 10020.8 Subdivisions & Developments (DR'S) 01/01/1998 01/31/1999 01/31/2001 09-02-03 1 Box Contents: MDR's {1998) FOLDER Description 1 MDR 98-01 thru 98-04; MDR 98-06 thru 98-08 01/01/1998 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 2 MDR 98-10 thru 98-13; MDR 98-15 thru 98-23 01/01/1998 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 3 MDR 98-25 and 98-27 thru 98-34 01/01/1998 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 4 *** ~ *** 01/01/1998 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen ] scan/Recyc 2532 10020.8 Subdivisions & Developments (DR'S) 05/01/199S 01/31/1999 01/31/2001 09-01-01 6 Page 14 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:17 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: S;tNCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you anthorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13,' 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: DR's (some 1995, some 1996) FOLDER Description 1 DR 95-14 thru 95-18 & 95-20 05/01/1995 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 2 DR 96-12, 96-13, 96-15, 96-17 05/01/1995 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 3 *** ~cc~ LC Sc~ *** 05/01/1995 01/31/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen ] Scan/Recyc 2529 10020.8 Subdivisions & Developments (DR's) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 06/30/2001 09-02-03 3 BOX CoNtents: DE~S FOLDER Description 1 DR 94-20 (T-10210) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 2 Environ Assess & DR 93-04 (Schlosser) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 3 DR 93-01, 93-02, 93-06 (T-13810), 93-07 (Bausman) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 4 DR 93-09 (Rancho Pacific), 93-10 (Rancho Pac + T-12332.2) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 5 DR 93-11 (Lot 15, Laredo Dr), 93-12 (McVay) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 6 DR 93-14 (Hillside SFR), 93-15 (Campos), 93-16, 93-18 (Goss) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 7 DR 93-19, 95-28 (Woodbridge), 90-11 (Hillside SFR) 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen 8 *** N~ *** 06/01/1990 06/30/1999 Subdivisions & Developmen ] Scan/Recyc 2542 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 02/01/1987 12/31/1988 12/31/1990 03-02-03 i Date J. M~rkman, City Attorney Page 15 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report F~ 94 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of BACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code {Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ] Scan/Recyc 2555 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 12/01/1986 06/30/1989 06/30/1991 11-01-03 3 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 DR for TT 13542 12/01/1986 06/30/1989 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for TT 13542 (Grigsby Dev} 12/01/1986 06/30/1989 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13542 12/01/1986 06/30/1909 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 13650 (Greenview Estates) 12/01/1986 06/30/1989 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Scanned 8/6/2001 *** 12/01/1986 06/30/1989 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2556 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 01/01/1987 12/31/1989 12/31/1991 11-01-03 2 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 DR - 13444 (Pulte Homes) 01/01/1987 12/31/1989 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13444 01/01/1987 12/31/1989 Tracts and Parcels 3 DR - TT 13444 (Victoria vineyards) 01/01/1987 12/31/1989 Tracts and Parcels 4 13444 Plans 01/01/1987 12/31/1989 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Scanned 8/27/2001 *** 01/01/1987 12/31/1989 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2935 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 10/01/1986 06/30/1990 06/30/1992 09-01-01 3 Page 16 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 ~ 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLA/~NING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone~ (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 DR for TT 13114; TT 13114; DR for TT 13441 (Grupe) 06/30/1990 12/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR 13443 (Republic); TT 13441; TT 13443 06/30/1990 12/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 3 DR for TT 13440; DR for Tract 13440 06/30/1990 12/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** '4~ *** 06/30/1990 12/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2528 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 12/31/1992 09-02-03 4 BOX Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 12820 Plans 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 2 13063 - Citation 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 12820 - Highland Comm Church 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 12820 - CTK Incorp 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 5 TT 12237 - Woodland Pacific 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 6 T 12820 & 13727 DR - Southland Der 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 7 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 04/01/1982 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2554 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 05/01/1987 05/30/1991 05/30/1993 11-01-03 4 Page 17 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report ~ 94 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLA/~NIN~ DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, ~AIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Hark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# FOLDER Description I DR for T-13621 (DR 89-26) 05/01/1987 05/30/1991 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13621 05/01/1987 05/30/1991 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13642 (Norrell) 05/01/1987 05/30/1991 Tracts and Parcels 4 DR 13642 (Hix Devpt) 05/01/1987 05/30/1991 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Scanned 8/20/2001 *** 05/01/1987 05/30/1991 Tracts and Parcels ] scan/Recyc 2557 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 02/01/1987 07/31/1991 07/31/1993 11-01-03 1 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 TT 13442 (william Lyon) 02/01/1987 07/31/1991 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR - T-13442 (Watt Inland Emp} 02/01/1987 07/31/1991 Tracts and Parcels 3 DR for T-13442 02/01/1987 07/31/1991 Tracts and Parcels 4 13442 Plans 02/01/1987 07/31/1991 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Scanned 8/27/2001 *** 02/01/1987 07/31/1991 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2522 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 07/01/1985 04/30/1992 04/30/1994 09-03-02 3 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description i TT 13351 (Lewis Homes); TT 13298 (Lewis) 07/01/1985 04/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13359 (Walton); TT 13114 07/01/1985 04/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels I Page 18 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:17 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~-~ Unknown 4333 PLYING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, ~AIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 3 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 07/01/1985 04/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2533 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 07/01/1987 11/30/1992 11/30/1994 09-01-01 5 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description i TT 13281 DR (Brock Homes #2) 07/01/1987 11/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13281 (William Lyon #1) 07/01/1987 11/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 24380 (William Lyon) 07/01/1987 11/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels ~an%e~ %~-/0 % 07/01/1987 11/30/1992 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2531 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 05/01/1987 01/31/1993 01/31/1995 09-02-03 2 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description i TT 13697 (Daly Homes) 08/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for T-13674 (Mighty Dev) 05/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13674 05/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 13664 (Lewis Dev) 05/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 5 DR for TT 13664 (Lewis Homes) 08/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 6 DR for TT 13662 (Lewis Homes) 09/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 7 TT 13663 (Lewis Dev) 05/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 8 TT 13644 08/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels Page 19 Notification NLu~ber 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report ~ 94 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SA/~CHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4527 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide l a memo Justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-~ber 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Pe=manent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box N,,mber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 9 *** ~_%~ ~, *** 05/01/1987 01/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2563 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 04/01/1988 10/31/1993 10/31/1998 05-01-02 4 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 DR for TT 13857 & 13858 (Brock & Son's Inc); Plans; 04/01/1988 10/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR 13857 & 13858 - modification; 04/01/1988 10/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13877 (Johnson) 04/01/1988 10/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 04/01/1988 10/31/1993 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2565 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 07/01/1987 01/31/1994 01/31/1996 07-02-01 2 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 DR 13748 (Griffin Homes}; DR T-13748 (Centex); TT 13748 (Ahmanson); 07/01/1987 01/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 2 13748 Plans; TT 13742 (A.C. and C.); TT 13738 (Rodine} 07/01/1987 01/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 3 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 07/01/1987 01/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels [] Bcan/Recyc 2525 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 08/01/1980 02/28/1994 02/28/1996 09-03-02 2 Planner J. ~arkman, City Attorney Date ~r~ ~r,~ Date Pa~e 20 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17=24:17 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire l~st to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box N,~ber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: Tentative Tract (10210) FOLDER Description 1 TT 10210, plus DR for it, plus plans 08/01/1980 02/28/1994 Tracts and Parcels 2 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 08/01/1980 02/28/1994 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2541 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 08/03/1983 05/31/1994 05/31/1996 05-01-03 2 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description i TT 12659 - Blanton 08/03/1983 05/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for TT 12659 - Security M~mt 08/03/1983 05/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 3 12659 - Plans 08/03/1983 05/31/1954 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 12462 - Jensen 08/03/1983 05/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 5 TT 12420 - Rancho Park Villas 08/03/1983 05/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 6 *** Reed to Scan *** 08/03/1983 05/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2523 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 07/01/1987 08/31/1994 08/31/1996 09-08-03 6 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts POLDER Description i TT 13715; DR - T-13703; TT 13703 07/01/1987 08/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 2 Environ Assess & TT 13717 (Lewis Homes File #1) 07/01/1987 08/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13717 (File #2); 13717 - Mod - Plans 07/01/1987 08/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 07/01/1987 08/31/1994 Tracts and Parcels Date../~rad B~%~r', i~P~anner ~//~ I Date J.~Markman, City Attorney Page 21 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report 94 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 pLAnNING DIVISION Eill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ] scan/Recyc 2571 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 03/01/1989 08/30/1995 08/30/1997 03-02-01 5 Sox Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description i TT 13565 (Etiwanda North); DR for TT 13565 (Standard Pacific); 03/01/1989 08/30/1995 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for 13565 & 6 & 7 and DR for 13565 Phases 5,9,10 (Standard Pacific); 03/01/1989 08/30/1995 Tracts and Parcels 3 DR for TT 13565 & 6 & 7 & 8 (Standard Pacific); Plans 03/01/1989 08/30/1995 Tracts and Parcels 4 DR for TT 13565 Lots 1-5, 23-26, Phase 5 (Standard Pacific) 03/01/1989 08/30/1995 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 03/01/1989 08/30/1995 Tracts and Parcels [] Scan/Recyc 2527 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 02/01/1987 06/30/1996 06/30/1998 09-01-03 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 DR for TT 13566 (Rockfield) 02/01/1987 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR 13566 - Century American 02/01/1987 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 3 DR 13566, TT 13566 - Caryn, TT 13566 02/01/1987 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 02/01/1967 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2539 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 06/30/1998 06-03-02 6 I I / t I Date ~-'~r~ad ~, C~/Planner Date J. ~arkman, City Attorney Page 22 Notification N,~mher 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24:17 '~'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo Justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-mher 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code BOX Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# FOLDER Description 1 TT 13886 - Nalbandian/Chiao 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13886 - Modification 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 3 DR 13890 - Greystone Homes 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 13890 - Acacia Const 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 8 DR for VTT 13890 - Greystone Homes 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 6 DR for VTT 13890 - Homestead 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 7 Misc. Plans 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 8 *** Need to Scan *** 01/01/1988 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2575 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 10/01/1989 06/30/1996 06/30/1998 03-02-03 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description I VTT 14211 (3rd File); TT 14211 (2nd File); TT 14211 (3 Files); 10/01/1989 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 14263 (EGM Dev}; DR for 14263 (G & D Constr} 10/01/1989 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels 3 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 10/01/1989 06/30/1996 Tracts and Parcels ] 8can/Recyc 2570 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 09/01/1989 07/30/1996 07/30/1998 06-02-03 Date ,-'"'Brad ~, C't~/P~anner Date J. Matin, City Atto~ey Page 23 Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 94 17:24:17 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box ~,~her Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ] Scan/Recyc 2536 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 02/28/1999 06-01-01 1 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description i VTT 14011 - Pannon De~t 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13945 - Citation 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13898 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 13930 - Winbrook 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 5 TT 13976 - C.P. Lange 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 6 DR Tract 13813 - Perry 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 7 TT 13813 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels 8 ***~~N~ **~ 03/01/1988 02/28/1997 Tracts and Parcels ] $can/Recyc 2567 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 07/01/1989 10/31/1997 10/31/1999 06-03-03 5 Sox Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description I DR for TT 13564 & TT 13564 (Akins Devpt Co); Plans 07/01/1989 10/31/1997 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for TT 13564 {Rockfield); TT 13564 (Etiwanda North) 07/01/1989 10/31/1997 Tracts and Parcels 3 T-10035 Mod (Calprop Corp) 07/01/1989 10/31/1997 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 07/01/1989 10/31/1997 Tracts and Parcels Page 24 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report 94 17:24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box N~mher Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ] 8can/Recyc 2566 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 04/01/1986 02/28/1998 02/28/2000 06-02-03 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description I TT 13316 (Freidman Eomes) (1 & 2 of 3); 04/01/1986 02/28/1998 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for TT 13316 (L.D. King) (3 of 3) 04/01/1986 02/28/1998 Tracts and Parcels 3 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 04/01/1986 02/28/1998 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2524 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 01/01/1991 03/30/1988 03/30/2000 09-03-03 5 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 TT 15354 - William Lyon Co 01/01/1991 03/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 15288 - vineyards 01/01/1991 03/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 3 VTT 15289 - Vineyards North 01/01/1991 03/30/1998 Tracts a~d Parcels 4 TT 15172 - Jerry Cochran 01/01/1991 03/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 01/01/1991 03/30/1998 Tracts a~d Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2569 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 03/01/1989 06/30/1998 06/30/2000 09-01-03 6 BOX Contents: Tentative Tracts POLDER Description I TT 14365 (Lewis); TT 14534 (Wm Lyon); TT 14316 (Lewis); 03/01/1989 06/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 14368 (Western Properties); TT 14490 (Lewis) 03/01/1989 06/30/1988 Tracts and Parcels 3 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 03/01/1989 06/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels Dat~rad ~, Ck,/Planner Date J. ~arkman, City Attorney Page 25 Notification Number 10/25/2001 Destruction Notification Report 94 17=24:17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name= 4333 Records Coordinator= SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide la memo justifying the hold. Return the entire llst to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ] Scan/Recyc 2526 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 05/01/1988 09/30/1998 09/30/2000 09-03-03 4 Box Contents= Tenta=lve Tracts FOLDER Description i 11734 Plans 05/01/1988 09/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13280 DR (Centex Homes) 05/01/1988 09/90/1998 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 11734 DR 05/01/1988 09/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 13280 DR 05/01/1988 09/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Scanned October, 2001 *** 05/01/1988 09/30/1998 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2564 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 09/01/1987 01/31/1999 01/31/2001 05-03-02 Box Contents= Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 TT 13772 (Mighty Devpt) 09/01/1987 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 2 DR for TT 13759 (FU Mai); TT 13759 (Des Arch. Design Group); 09/01/1987 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13753 (Wm Lyon Co); DR for TT 13753 (Penhill CO); 09/01/1987 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 4 DR 13753 (Lewis Homes); DR TT 13753 (Lewis) 09/01/1987 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 5 *** Needs to be scanned *** 09/01/1987 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels ] Scan/Recyc 2568 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 09/01/1988 01/31/1999 01/31/2001 05-02-03 i Date Date J. Markman, City Attorney ~r~d Bu~,' ~Planner Page 26 Notification Number 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 17:24=17 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown ~ 4333 PL~/~NING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator= SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Neme Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description I DE for TT 14139 (Centex Homes); TT 14139 (Ahmanson); 09/01/1988 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 14121 (william Lyon); TT 14459 (I~% Chanco); TT 14486 (LIAO); 09/01/1988 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 14476 (Bitter & Assoc); DR 14121 (Rhoades Devpt) 09/01/1988 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** Heeds to be Scanned *** 09/01/1988 01/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels Scan/Recyc 2534 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 02/01/1990 02/28/1999 02/28/2001 09-01-01 4 Box Contents: VTT & TT & EIR files FOLDER Description i TT 14475 Odds & Ends; %~fT 14475 (File 9 of 5); 01/01/1990 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 2 VTT 14475 (two files - Sahama Invest ~1 & #2) 01/01/1990 12/31/1990 Tracts and. Parcels 3 EIR for ~TT 14475 (2 files - Sahama Invest #3 & #4) 01/01/1990 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels 4 *** ~~.~ 01/01/1990 12/31/1990 Tracts and Parcels ,[] Scan/Recyc 2538 10020.9 Tracts and Parcels 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 10/91/2001 06-01-03 1 Box Contents: Tentative Tracts FOLDER Description 1 TT 13808 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 2 TT 13828 - Pannon 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 3 TT 13808 & Environ Assess - Lewis 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 4 TT 13796 - Lewis Devpt 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels Date J. ~'arkman, City Attorney Date~rad~er, C~ Planner ~ ~' ~'~ Page 27 Notification Number 10/25/2001 94 Destruction Notification Report 17:24:17 T~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown ~ 4333 PLA/FNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SANCHEZ, GAIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext.4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to he destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division hy November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 5 TT 13873 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 6 TT 13810 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels 7 *** Need to Scan *** 12/01/1987 10/31/1999 Tracts and Parcels ] Recycle 2240 8021.1 Tree Removal Permits 02/01/1995 12/31/1997 12/31/2001 06-01-01 3 Box Contents: Tree Removal, HOP, & Ei~n Permits POLDER Description i Tree Removals 95-01 thru 97-27 (but missing 95-06,7,9,11,14,16,17; 02/01/1995 12/31/1997 Tree Removal Permits 2 96-01,9,8,10,16,17; 97-11,19,23) 02/01/1995 12/31/1997 Tree Removal Permits ~ ~%~-- HOP 96-01 thzn/ 97-341 (but missing 96-01,25,47,63,193,169,182,198, 02/01/1995 244,331,379; 97-13,148,180,209,246,255,262,292) 02/01/1995 12/31/1997 ~&~<--~ Sign 96-01 thru97-42 (but missing 96-23,34,41,54,95,72,74; 97-01,2 02/01/1995 12/31/1997~4~ 3,4,21,28,29,30,40,41) 02/01/1995 12/31/1997 ] Scan/Recyc 2560 10021.7 Variances & Minor Exceptions 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 01/31/2001 05-01-03 5 BOX Contents: Minor Exceptions FOLDER Description 1 ME 93-01 (Butters); ME 93-02 (10164 Monte Vista); ME 93-03 (Maggard) 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 2 ME 93-05 (7086 Dakota); ME 93-07 (Mallory); MS 93-08 (Peter); ME 93-10 (Nuller); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 3 ME 94-02 (Knothen); ME 94-03 (Fornal); ME 94-04; ME 94-05 (Backofen); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 4 ME 94-06; ME 94-07 (Solls); ME 94-08; ME 94-09 {12773 Arena); ME 94-10; 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti I ///¢? /',''' I/'/,,'/¢-" '1 I Page 28 Notification N~m~er 94 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 ~ 17:24:18 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4333 PLANNING DIVISION Bill to Name: 4333 Records Coordinator: SAI~CHEZ, ~AIL Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4327 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to BACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of BACH page. If you want a bix held for an additional 6 months, provide la memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Diviszon by Nov-~her 13, 2001. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 5 ME 94-11; ME 94-12 {Aschoff); ME 95-01 (Miller/Wray); ME 95-02 (James); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 6 ME 95-03 {TT 14116); ME 95-04 (wall height); ME 95-06 (Sheffield Homes); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 7 ME 95-05; ME 95-08 {8646 Vineyard); ME 95-09 (Pacific Bell Mobil Svcs); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Exceptl 8 ME 96-01; ME 96-03 (10329 Rancho); ME 96-04; ME 96-05 (T-15732 Lewis); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 9 ME 96-06 (7893 Alta Cuesta); ME 96-07 (Johnson); ME 96-09 {Bozinski); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 10 ME 96-11 (Mastercraft); ME 96-12 (Richard Green); ME 97-01 {Pilato); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Except1 11 ME 97-02 (Pat Hein); ME 97-03 (T-13835 Sheffield); ME 97-06 (Mtn Shadows); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Exceptl 12 ME 97-08; ME 97-09 (6257 Cameo); ME 97-11 (6249 Quartz); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Except1 13 ME 97-15 (8269 Calle Del Prado); ME 97-17 (Weaver); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Except1 14 ME 97-19 (9218 La Grande); ME 97-20 (8391 Bella Vista); ME 97-21 (Daniels}; 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 15 ME 97-22 (Northtown}; MS 97-23 (Overland Co); ME 97-25 (Haven village); 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Except1 16 MS 98-03 (12845/12877); ME 98-04 (Ludlow); ME 98-05 (Centex) 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Except1 17 ME 98-06 {wall); ME 98-07 (T-14459); ME 98-08; ME 98-10 (Wilson) 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excepti 18 *** Needs to be Scanned *** 01/01/1993 01/31/1999 Variances & Minor Excegti Eligible Boxes on Mold = 12 Blgibile Boxes Checked Out -- 0 Elgihile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 41 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date ~-'~r&d ~r', ~ Planner Date Markman, City Attorney Pa~e Notification Number 10/25/2001 95 Destr%lction Notification Report ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4373 BUILDING & SAFETY DIV Bill to Name: 4373 Records Coordinator: COURTNEY, LINDA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4227 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire llst to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# ~Scan/Recyc 2017 8020.1 Construction Permits 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/30/2001 12-03-02 5 BOX Contents: Building Permits (3/99 - 8/99 A-O) FOLDER Description i *** Scanned August, 1999 *** 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 Construction Per, its ~Ecan/Recyc 2018 8020.1 Construction Permits 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/30/2001 12-03-02 BOX Contents: Building Permits (3/99-8/89 P-Z + Tracts FOLDER Description I *** Scanned August, 1899 *** 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 Constr~ction Permits ~Scan/Recyc 2019 8020.1 Construction Permits 09/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/30/2001 07-03-03 Box Contents: Building Permits 3/99-8/99 w/attachments FOLDER Description i *** These permits all have attachments - 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 Construction Permits 2 such as plans, maps, designs *** 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 Construction Permits 3 *** Scanned 9/1999 *** 03/01/1999 08/30/1999 Construction Permits ~Scan/Recyc 2040 8020.1 Construction Permits 08/01/1999 10/31/1999 10/31/2001 11-02-01 6 Date ~. Maksh~6f'f, Bldg/~%~ty Off Date J. Markman, City Attorney Page i Notification Number 95 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga 16:53:10 ~ Unknown 4373 BUILDING & SAFETY DIV Bill to Name: 4373 Records Coordinator: COURTNEy, LINDA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4227 he destroyed, then sign a date the Bottom of EACH page. If you want &.box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: Bui~-~ Permits 8/99 - 10/99 (A-H) FOLDER Description i *** Scanned Oct, Nov 1999 *** 08/01/1999 10/31/1999 Construction Permits ~/Scan/Recyc Construction Permits 08/01/1999 10/31/1999 10/31/2001 12-03-03 4 2087 8020.1 BOX Contents: Ftnaled building permits (8/99 - 10/99) ~can/Recyc Construction Permits 10/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 12-02-02 1 2088 8020.1 Box Contents: Building Permits (A-L) 10/99 ~ 12/99 FOLDER Description 1 10/01/1999 12/31/1999 Construction Permits ~Scan/Recyc 10/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 12-03-02 6 2096 8020.1 Construction Perm/ts Box Contents: Bldg Permits a Plans (M-Z, Tracts, PM's) Date f. ~ k~6ff, Bld~/Safety Off Date J.~Mar~an, City Attorney Page 2 Eligible Boxes on Hold Elgibile Boxes Checked Out Elgibile Boxes Excepted Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked ou~, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Notification Number 96 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 ~ 16=53:20 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4532 COMMUNITY SERVICES Bill to Nm&e: 4532 Records Coordinator: MORALES, MELISSA Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2103 I The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place initials next your to EACH box authorize you to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Hark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box ~mber Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Shred 2276 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/1998 08/21/1999 08/21/2001 07-05-03 5 ~ox Contents= Regist Forms & Deposits 6/98 - 8/99 ~Shred 2073 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/30/2001 07-02-02 3 Box Contents= S~umner '99 Regist / Receipts, Deposits Shred 2074 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/30/2001 07-01-03 6 Box Contents= Summer '99 Regist / Receipts, Deposits red 2075 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/1999 08/30/1999 08/90/2001 07-01-03 8 BOX Contents: Suu~er ~99 Registration forms S~S~red 2270 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 04/26/1999 10/28/1999 10/28/2001 07-05-02 4 Box Contents: Playschool Deposits 4/99 - 10/99 red 2271 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 0~8/21/1999 12/18/1999 12/18/2001 07-05-02 Page Notification ~,mhe4 10/25/2001 96 Destruction Notification Report ~ 16:53:20 (~ city of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown 4532 COMMUNITY SERVICES Bill to Name: 4532 Records Coordinator: MORALES, MELISSA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2103 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-mher 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box ~,mher Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Sox Contents: Regist Forms & Deposits 8/99 - 12/99 Shred 2213 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 10-02-01 4 Box Contents: Fall 1999 Deposits, receipts Shred 2214 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 10-02-01 3 Box Contents: Fall 1999 Deposits, Receipts Shred 2215 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 08/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 10-02-01 2 BOX Contents: Fall 1999 Registration Forms Shred 2223 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 01/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 10-02-01 6 Box Contents: Registration Deposit Records 1/99-12/98 Shred 2228 14010.2 Registration Forms & Receipts 06/01/1998 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 02-01-01 3 Page 2 Notification Number 96 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 16:53:20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4532 COMMUNITY SERVICES Bill to Name: 4532 Records Coordinator: MORALES, MELISSA Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:2103 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sz~n' & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide la memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-~her 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Held? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: Receipt Books (6/98-12/99) S~S~red 2263 16010.7 Use of City Facilities 01/01/1998 12/31/1999 12/31/2001 04-03-01 3 Box Contents: City Facility Use Reservations FOLDER Description 1 Park reservations & request cancellations forms 01/01/1998 12/31/1999 Use of City Facilities 2 Building reservation request forms 01/01/1998 12/31/1999 Use of City Facilities Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 12 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Svcs Dir ma=e ~. MarKman, City Attorney Page 3 Notification Number 97 Destruction Notlf~cation Report 10/25/2001 ~ 16:53:29 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 2292 CODS ENFORCEMENT Bill to Name: 4373 Records Coordinator: SASSE, NANCY Mail Code= Phones (909)%77-2700 ext.4225 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to he destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you went a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by Nov-mher 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Shred 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 12/$1/2001 02-01-02 8 2186 Ehred 2187 2031.0 Code Enforcement Violations 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 12/31/2001 02-01-02 $ Box Contents: Code Enl. Violations (7/98 - 12/98) FOLDER Description i Residential - T thru Numeric 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 Code Enforcement Violatio Shred 2188 2031.0 Code Enforcement Violations 07/01/1898 12/31/1998 12/31/2001 02-01-02 4 BOX Contents: Code Enl. Violations (7/98 - 12/98) FOLDER Description i COmm'l (J-numeric), Resid (A-Cambridge) 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 Code Enforcement violatio Shred 2189 2031.0 Code Enforcement Violations 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 12/31/2001 02-01-02 3 Box Contents: Code Enl. Violations (7/98 - 12/98) FOLDER Description 1 Residential - N thru S 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 Code Enforcement Violatio It/ I I Date B~. Maks~f~, B~ Official Date J. Mar~man, City Attorney Page 1 Notification Number 97 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 16:53:29 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 2292 CODE ENFORCEMENT Bill to Name: 4373 Records Coordinator= SASSE, NANCY Mail Code= Phone= (909)477-2700 ext=4225 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo Justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 4Shred 2190 2031.0 Code Enforcement Violations 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 02-01-02 BOX Contents: Code Enl. Violations {7/98 - 12/98) FOLDER Description i Residental - Hillside thru M 07/01/1998 12/31/1990 Code Enforcement Violatio Code Enforcement Violations 07/01/1998 12/31/1998 12/31/2001 02-01-02 1 Shred 2191 2031.0 Box Contents= Code Enl. Violations (7/98 - 12/98) FOLDER Description 1 Residential o Candlewood thru Hemlock 07/01/1998 12/31/1990 Code Enforcement Violatio Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 6 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date E: M~kshan6ff, ~ldg Offlcial Date J. Markman, City Attorney Page 2 Notification Number 98 Destruction Notification Report 10/25/2001 16:53=37 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Unknown ~ 4245 FACILITIES MAINT/YARD Bill to Name: 4245 Records Coordinator= UNGASHICK, J~LIE Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2700 ext=4102 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to I be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying' the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 13, 2001. Hark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box ~,mher Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# '~shred 2310 14041.0 Service Order Requests 06/01/1996 08/30/1996 08/30/2001 09-02-01 1 Box Contents: Service Order Requests (6/96 - 8/96) ~Shred 2304 14041.0 Service Order Requests 09/01/1996 10/31/1996 10/31/2001 09-02-02 5 Box Contents: Service Order Requests (9/96 - 10/96) E = Excluded Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Rlgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 2 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked out, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date Da~ Bi~¥ns, Pub Wks Mgr Date Joe~i~, City Engineer Date J. Mark~uan, City Attorney Page i Notification Number 99 Destruction Notification Report 12/20/2001 16:13=58 ~ City of Rancho Cuuamonga ~ Unknown ~ 4637 ENGINEERING/ADMIN Bill to Name: 4637 Records Coordinator: WHYTE, DIANE Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4013 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a m-mo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by January 3, 2002. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) /ode Box N~mher Code (Box Contents) Eeginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# an/Recyc 1951 8020.2 Conditional Use Permits (CUP~s) 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 07/30/2001 07~02-03 2 FOLDER Description 1 MDR 95-11 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 2 DR 93-04 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 3 DR 93-16 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 4 DR 94-21 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 5 CUP 93-46 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 6 CUP 93-46 right of way 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 7 CUP 94-03 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 8 CUP 94-07 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 9 CUP 94-11 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 10 CUP 99-06 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 11 CUP 95-15 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 12 CUP 95-31 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits 13 *** Need to scan before destruction *** 02/10/1993 07/30/1997 Conditional Use Permits ~S~~re~ 1963 1020.1 Oen'l Corresondence 01/01/1993 12/31/1995 12/31/1997 02-03-01 6 S ox Contents: General correspondence 1/93 - 12/95 ed 1964 1020.1 Gen'l Corresondence 01/01/1996 12/31/1997 12/31/1999 02-03-01 5 Date Shintu Bose, Dep City Engineer Date Jo~O'Neil, City Engineer Date Ji~ Markman, City Attorney Page i Notification Number 99 Destruction Notification Report 12/20/2001 16:13:58 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4637 ENGINEERING/ADMIN Bill to Name: 4637 Records Coordinators WHYTE, DIANE Mail Code: Phons: (909)477-2700 ext:4013 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by January 3, 2002. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box ~mher Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# Box Contents: ~eneral correspondence 1/96 - 12/97 ~S~red 2091 1020.1 ~en'l Corresondence 01/01/1996 12/31/1997 12/91/1999 05-01-01 Box Contents: Correspondence 1/1996 - 12/1997 an/Recyc 365 10021.1 Hydrology Studies 01/01/1986 12/29/1986 12/29/1996 17-01-01 1 FOLDER Description 1 VICTORIA 01/01/1986 12/29/1986 Hydrology Studies Recyc 338 10021.1 Hydrology Studies 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 12/29/1997 16-01-01 4 FOLDER Description I CARYN 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 Hydrology Studies 2 HYDRAULICS STUDY VICTORIA VINEYARDS SOUTH PM 9350 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 Hydrology Studies 3 HYDRAULICS STUDY VICTORIA MAY 27,1988 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 Hydrology Studies 4 DRAINAGE STUDY VICTORIA VINYARDS SOUTH PM 9350 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 Hydrology Studies 5 DRAINAGE STUDY MARCH 11, 1988 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 Hydrology Studies 6 TR 13073 VICTORIA R.V. STATION FLOOD ROOFING STI~Dy 01/01/1987 12/29/1987 Hydrology Studies .' Recyc $$7 10021.1 Hydrology Studies 01/01/1988 12/29/1988 12/29/1998 18-01-01 3 Dat~ ! Shintu Bose~ Dep City Engineer Date Je~/O'N~il,'City Engineer Date Jim Markman, City Attorney Page 2 Notification Nun%her 99 Destruction Notification Report 12/20/2001 16:13:59 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4637 ENGINEERING/ADMIN Bill to Name: 4637 Records Coordinator: WHYTE, DIAR~ Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4013 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by January 3, 2002. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Mold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# FOLDER Description 1 VICTORIA 01/01/1988 12/29/1988 Hydrology Studies ~' Scan/Recyc 366 10021.1 Hydrology Studies 01/01/1988 12/29/1988 12/29/1998 17-01-01 3 ~ FOLDER Description I TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER 01/01/1988 12/29/1988 Hydrology Studies ~Scan/Recy¢ 367 10021.1 Hydrology Studies 01/01/1988 12/29/1988 12/29/1998 17-01-01 ~FOLDER Description 5 1 VICTORIA 01/01/1988 12/29/1988 Hydrology Studies ~Sc~n/Recyc 1512 10021.1 Hydrology Studies 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 02/07/1999 05-02-01 1 TERRA VISTA Pk4LNNED COMMUNITY 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 2 M.P.S.D. LINE 5-1 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Rydrology Studies 3 S.E. PARR BASIN NO. 1 & S.W. PARK BASIN NO. 2 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 4 M.P.S.D. LINE 5-3 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 5 EAST GREENWAY S.D. (M.P.S.D. 5-1) 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 6 HAVEN AVE S.D. 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 7 M.P.S.D. LINE 2-1 FOR SPRUCE AVE 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 8 M.E.S.D. LINE 1-2 FROM FOOTHILL TO TOWN CENTER 12/18/1987 02/07/1989' Hydrology Studies Date'/ Shintu Bose, Dep City Engineer Date- Jo~/OFNe~l, City Engineer Date Jim~arkman, City Attorney Page 3 ~O=lZ~cation Number 12/20/2001 99 Destruction Notification Report 16:13:59 city of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4637 ENGINEERiNG/ADMIN Bill to Name: 4637 Records Coordinator~ WHYTE, DIANE Mail Code: Phone: (909)477-2700 ext:4013 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then si~n & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by January 3, 2002. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X) Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# 9 M.P.S.D. LINE 5-1 LINE E 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 11 M.P.S.D. LINE 1-3 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 12 M.P.S.D. LINE 1-3 12/18/1987 02/07/1989 Hydrology Studies 2 *** Scanned 3/2000 *** 12/01/1986 10/31/1997 Subdivisions & Developmen Dat~ ~ Shintu Bose, Dep Cmty Engmneer ma~e oq~e/~'Neil, Cmty Engineer Date Jim Markman, City Attorney Page 4 Notification Number 99 Destruction Notification Report 12/20/2001 16:13:59 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown 4637 ENGINEERING/ADMIN Bill to Name: 4637 Records Coordinators WHYTE, DIANE Mail Code= Phone: (909)477-2700 ext=4013 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/2001. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a m-mo justifying the hold. Return the entire list to the Records Division by January 3, 2002. Mark Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Dates On Destroy (X)Jode Box N,~m~er Code (Box Contents) Beginning Ending Hold? 12/31/2001 Location Space# \~an/Recyc 2585 10020.9 Tracts and Parcel Maps 02/01/1988 08/31/1997 **HOLD** 08/31/1999 11-02-01 2 Eligible Boxes on Hold = 3 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Elgibile Boxes Excepted = 0 Boxes to be Destroyed for this Department = 10 ( Excluding boxes on hold or boxes with folders on hold or checked OUt, and excluding boxes selected for exception ) Date~ -- Shintu Bose, Dep City En ~neer [ //r ~ ~ g' eil, City Engineer Date Ji~ Markman, City Attorney Page 5 R A N C h 0 C U C A M O N G A ~Ot~t~NITy .ql~v~CE~ St Re r TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III DATE: January 16, 2002 SUBJECT: Approval of a Request for Waiver of Fees for the Epicenter Stadium from the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Baseball Club for a Public Workout by the California Angels on February 2, 2002 and February 6, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a request for waiver of fees for the Epicenter Stadium from the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Baseball Club (the Quakes) for a public workout by the California Angels on February 2, 2002 and February 6, 2002. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from the Quakes for a waiver of fees for a public workout by the Califomia Angels at the Epicenter Stadium on February 2, 2002 and February 6, 2002. The event this year would be the second time such an activity has taken place at the Epicenter. This event would allow the public the opportunity to watch Major League Baseball players free of charge in our community. The public workouts will entail a batting practice session and an autograph session after the batting practice. The first public workout date of February 2nd would be an open house for the public and the second date of February 6t~ would be reserved for local businesses, Quakes sponsors, season ticket holders and group leaders who had held activities at Quakes games in the past. //4 CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER FOR PUBLIC WORKOUT BY CALIFORNIA ANGELS JANUARY 16, 2002 8taft has reviewed this request against Resolution gg-04g, A Resolution of the Oily Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and Oily Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter and has found that the request meets the criteria established for both facility rental fee waiver and waiver of direct Oily service charge for community special events. Therefore, staff recommends that the Oily Council approve the Quakes request for waiver of fees for the public workout sessions to be held at the Epicenter at the beginning of February 2002. As specified in Resolution gg-04g, insurance coverage naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured in the amount of $2 million dollars shall still be required of the applicant. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of fees associated with this event are estimated at $5,000. This figure may increase if Public Works receives a number of credentialed media requests to cover the workouts. Respe~ully submitte..d, Community Services Director ~C~MM$ERV~unci~&B~ards~ity~unci~Sta~Rep~ts~2~a~verRequestAnge~sPub~icW~ut1~16~2~d~c -2- 11 i R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~GINI~EI~ING DE PAI~T~EN T $ ffRepor DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15540, LOCATED BETWEEN THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF CUCAMONGA CREEK, SUBMI'I-I'ED BY VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map Number 15540, accepting the monumentation cash deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the City Clerk to sign and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 15540, located between the south side of Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route and Cucamonga Creek Channel, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 23, 1993, for a residential subdivision of 159 single family lots on 24.56 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District. The Developer, Van Daele Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $4,345,500.00 Labor and Material Bond: $2,172,750.00 Monumentation Cash Bond: $ 10,550.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15540 January 16, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitte,d, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:sc Attachments 121 VICINITY MAP PROJECT FOOTHILL AVENUE ARROw HIGttWAy '~ UPLAND 6th S~*~ET N.T,S ~ANCHO ~UCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IZ2 RESOLUTION NO. 02- 02 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAP, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15540 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 15540, submitted by Van Daele Development Corporation, located between the south side of Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, west of Cucamonga Creek Channel, being a division of 159 single family lots on 24.56 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on June 23, 1993, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15540 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by Van Daele Development Corporation, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15540 is hereby approved, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. 0'2 - ~2 q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 15540 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15540 January 16, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed Thc Owner of thc Property is: VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Thc legal description of thc Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15540 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 ? AND 20 OF THE SUBDIVISION "LOT 10" r~v ,~ ........ ,-,*' ~-u~-AtvlONGA VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE 1N BOOK 20, PAGE 44 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY A-1 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD # 1) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and 43.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park, 6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175 acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park located on 64 Street, west o£Archibald. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this distridt benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. B-1 /.27 Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15540 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 .... 4 .... SLD # 2 49 ........ ---- Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L1 .... *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S I S 2 L 1 159 --- 159 159 159 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY: The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. I (General City): # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49 Multi- Family Unit 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 TOTAL $944,691.45 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15540) is: 159 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $14,661.39 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Thc rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Multi- Family Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15540) is: 159 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. -- $2,825.43 Annual Assessment C-1 Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The fo/lowing table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment [.and Use Unit Tyne I/nits Units Factor Units l/nit Single " Revenue Family Parcel 6606 1.00 6606 $39.97 $264,042.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15540) is: 159 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $6,355.23 Annual Assessment C-2 13/3 I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 15955, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND VINEYARD, SUBMITTED BY JEFF LEE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map Number 15955, accepting the monumentation cash deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the City Clerk to sign and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 15955, located at the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2000, for a residential subdivision of 22 single family lots on 4.39 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential District. The Developer, Jeff Lee, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $276,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $138,150.00 Monumentation Cash Bond: $ 2,500.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15955 January 16, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Williak"r~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:sc Attachments 152 VICINITY MAP N. ES. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. ~) ~. - 0 ~0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAP, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15955 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 15955, submitted by Jeff Lee, located on the northeast comer of San Bemardino Road and Vineyard Avenue, being a division of 22 single family lots on 4.39 acres of land in the Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on June 28, 2000, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15955 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by Jeff Lee, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15955 is hereby approved, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. 0,2" O ;~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 15955 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territury to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and /35 RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15955 January 16, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in mounts not to exceed the mounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy ofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: JEFF LEE The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15955 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 7 OF MAP SUBDIVISION "B" OF CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD1NO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 20, PAGE 45 OF MAPS, 1N THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. [CREATE SHEET A-2: MAP OF TRACT WITH LMD AREAS HIGHLIGHTED] t37 VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and 43.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are n6t considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, medi~n islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park, 6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175 acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park located on 6a Street, west of Archibald. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the righis-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15955 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 1 ................ SLD # 2 81 ................ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 1 .... 1660 29 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 2 L 1 22 --- 22 22 22 B-2 /qb Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY: The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for thc fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49 Multi- Family Unit 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 TOTAL $944,691.45 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15955) is: 22 dwelling units x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $2,028.62 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 £or the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # o£ Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Multi- Family Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15955) is: 22 Units x I A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $390.94 Annual Assessment C-1 Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l,and ll~e I)'nit Type ! Jnits lYnit~ Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 6606 1.00 6606 $39.97 $264,042.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 15955) is: 22 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $879.34 Annual Assessment C-2 I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N GA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRepol¢ DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA REVISED UNIVERSITY PROJECT STREET, STORM DRAIN AND LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE GENERALLY LOCATED ON DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM THE 210 FREEWAY TO 600 FEET NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON WILSON AVENUE, BANYAN STREET AND VINTAGE DRIVE ALL GENERALLY BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL- SCE CORRIDOR AND BLUEGRASS AVENUE (FORMERLY HANLEY AVENUE), SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject agreement and securities and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Rancho Etiwanda Revised Development Project was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2000, for the division of 250 acres into 685 lots. The City and U.C.P. Inc. entered into a Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for development of this project, of which the subject street, storm drain and landscape infrastructure is a parL The Developer, Rancho Etiwanda, 685 LLC, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of those off-site infrastructure improvements in the following amounts and phase/limits: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RANCHO ETIWANDA REVISED UNIVERSITY PROJECT January 16, 2002 Page 2 Bond/Phase I: Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and 210 Freeway; Banyan Street between S.C.E. Corridor and Day Creek Boulevard; and Vintage Drive from Day Creek Boulevard to 400 feet easterly therefrom. Bond/Phase I1: Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue; Wilson Avenue between S.C.E. Corridor and Bluegrass Avenue; Bluegrass Avenue from Wilson Avenue to 800 Feet southerly therefrom. Bond/Phase Ilk Day Creek Boulevard from Wilson Avenue to 600 feet northerly therefrom. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE: Street/Storm Drain Infrastructure Landscape Infrastructure Phase I $1,370,100.00 $1,022,500.00 Phase II $2,156,000.00 $1,715,300.00 Phase lll $ 339,800.00 $ 399,300.00 SUBTOTALS $3,865,900.00 $3,137,100.00 LABOR AND MATERIAL: Street/Storm Drain Infrastructure Landscape Infrastructure Phase l $ 685,050.00 $ 511,250.00 Phase II $1,078,000.00 $ 857,650.00 Phase lll $ 169,900.00 $ 199,650.00 SUBTOTALS $1,932,950.00 $1,568,550.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, u' William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:sc Attachments Fl~ncho EtiW~nd~ Tentative Tract 1440~ t~u ~, ~2[ 1~23, ~8 ~d ~ ~C~ C~p~i~ RESOLUTION NO. 0 2- ~':~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA REVISED UNIVERSITY PROJECT AND THE STREET, STORM DRAIN AND LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way specifically described therein, and generally located on Day Creek Boulevard from the 210 Freeway to 600 feet north of Wilson Avenue on Wilson Avenue, Banyan Street and Vintage Drive all generally between Day Creek ChanneI-SCE Corridor and Bluegrass Avenue (formerly Hanley Avenue); and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Project and the Street, Storm Drain and Landscape Infrastructure Improvements; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A l~ N GIN E E I~ING DE PA~ T M E N T Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 16147 LOCATED SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET (FORMERLY SUMMIT) AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES, INC - APN'S: 225-171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22 AND 25 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 16147, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract No. 16147 located southwest corner of Banyan Street (formerly Summit) and Etiwanda Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission on January 10, 2001 for the development of 70 single family lots. The Developer, Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., a California Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $1,330,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 665,150.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT NO. 16147 Janua~ 16,2002 Page 2 The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Will~'m J. O'~eil City Engineer WJO:JS:$c Enclosures RESOLUTION NO. 0 2 "~ ,..~,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16147, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16147, submitted by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc. and consisting of 70 single family homes located at the southwest comer of Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) and Etiwanda Avenue, was .ap.proved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 10, 2001, and ~s In compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16147 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc., as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16147 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. O2 - i~) 3 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 16147 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent o£all of the owners of property within the tenitory to be annexed; and . ~7~q-IEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply 'to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the. owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and It;t) RESOLUTION NO. TRACT NO. 16147 Janllary 16, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Ten'itory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. /$/ Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CARRIAGE ESTATES II, LLC The legal description of the Property is: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16147 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1,7 A PORTION OF 8, 9 + 10 OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A- 1 TR 16147 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, Community Trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the North Etiwanda area. B - 1 TR 16147 Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: TRACT NO. 16147 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 1 ......... SLD # 7 39 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Tuff Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L 7 6491 --- 1703 9 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU or Acres S 1 S 7 L 7 B-2 TR 16147 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1314 1.00 1314 $307.05 $403,464.00 Corem/Ind. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $ 3,071.00 TOTAL $406,535.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16147) is: 70 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per A.U. = $21,493.50 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor lJnit~ Unit Revenue Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Family Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16147) is: 70 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $1,243.90 Annual Assessment C- 1 TR 16147 Exhibit "C' continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units IJnit Revenue Single Family Parcel 944 1.00 944 $33.32 $31,454~00 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.00 TOTAL $31,787.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16147) is: 70 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $2,332.40 Assessment C-2 TR 16147 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A C 0 bibiU ~IT¥ c~ E I~Vl C ~ & Staff Report TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director DATE: January 16, 2002 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL, INC. RELATING TO POLICE SECURITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No. 2 to the Lease Agreement between the City and Valley Baseball, Inc. relating to police requirement§ for Quakes game days. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Following the 2001 Quakes baseball season, team representatives requested that the City review the current levels of police security required in the lease agreement. The current agreement requires the Quakes to fund four (4) police officers for their weekday games, five (5) officers for weekend games and seven (7) officers for the July 4 and other sellout games. The agreement provides the City with authority to add additional officers for games, if needed, based on attendance trends. Based on the attendance trends for Quakes games over the past couple of years, the team has requested the City to lower the required number of officers per game. City and Police Department staff have analyzed the recent need for police security and have agreed that the current deployment of officers could be decreased for 2002. The proposed Lease Amendment will require three (3) police officers for weekday games, four (4) for weekends and seven (7) will still be required for July 4 or other sellout games. The City maintains the right to increase deployment if attendance increases dictate. The remaining requirements of Section 25 of the Lease are unaffected by this Amendment. CiTY COUNCIL MEETING LEASE AMENDMENT January 16, 2001 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT There will be no cost to the City associated with this Amendment. ed, Kevin McArdle Community Services Director KM Attachment -2- AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" HEREINAFTER) AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. ("TENANT" HEREINAFTER) A. Recitals. (i) During August, 1999, City and Tenant entered into the above-referenced Amended and Restated Lease ("the Lease" hereinafter) which has been amended once before. (ii) Paragraph 25 of the Lease requires that City provide security for the Stadium during certain time periods and City now does so by contracting with a private company which provides such services to the Stadium and adjoining playing fields, parking lots, maintenance building, and animal shelter. (iii) Tenant currently reimburses City for a portion of City's costs incurred in supplying the security services referred to in Recital (ii) above. (iv) The parties desire to again modify a payment schedule related to security. B. Amendment No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 25 of the Lease hereby is amended to read as follows: "25. Security. "City shall provide security for the Stadium during the following time periods: "A. From the completion of any event conducted at the Stadium until dawn of the following day; "B. From dusk of a weekday upon which no event is conducted at the Stadium until dawn of the following day; and "C. For all twenty-four (24) hours of each Saturday, Sunday and Holiday during which no event is conducted at the Stadium. "The parties understand that City may contract with an independent security service to discharge its above-stated~obligations. City and Tenant shall confer in establishing a security management plan to implement City's obligation to provide security stated herein. In addition, City shall provid6 a vehicle and radio transmission capacity on an as-needed basis in providing for the above- 11231\0001\676368 ' ] described security. In aid of providing security for the Stadium, Tenant shall pay to City the following total sums in ten (10) equal installments, payable on or before the first day of each successive month commencing in January in each of the following years: 1999 - $60,000 2000 - $62,500 2001 - $65,000 2002 - $67,500 2003 - $70,000 2004 - $72,500 2005 - $75,000 2006 - $77,500 2007 - $80,000 2008 - $82,500 2009 - $85,000 2010 - $87,500 2011 - $90,000 2012 - $92,500 "Tenant shall be responsible for providing all necessary security for the Stadium and each and every Class A baseball game held at the Stadium. Tenant agrees to use such security officers in type and amount described in Exhibit "E" hereto. It is anticipated that three (3) police officers shall be required for forty- seven (47) weekday games, four (4) police officers for twenty-three (23) weekend games and seven (7) police officers for the July 4 or other sellout games. During each year of the term hereof, Tenant shall pay for security costs calculated in accordance with Exhibit "E" hereto in five (5) equal installments at the same time as minimum annual rent shall be paid. Notwithstanding any other term or provision contained in this Section 25, security shall be provided in accordance with the above-referenced criteria, and should attendance compel the employment of officers in addition to those referred to above, Tenant shall reimburse City for 11231\0001\676368 2 the cost of providing such additional officers within thirty (30) days of City providing to Tenant a statement reflecting such additional costs." Exhibit "E" attached to this Amendment No. 2 shall replace and supersede Exhibit "E" attached to the Lease. 3. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 2 as of the dates stated below as to each such party. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: Mayor Dated: Attest: City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. Dated: By: President 11231\0001\676368 3 EXHIBIT "E" Parameters of Security Services Only San Bemardino County Deputy Sheriffs or San Bemardino County Deputy Sheriffs Reserve personnel shall be used at each and every home game played at the Epicenter by the Tenant. The Tenant shall pay for any and all necessary security personnel for each game based on the following ratio of attendance to officers: Attendance Number of Sheriff's Officers 1 ~ 2,000 3 2,001 - 4,000 3 plus 1 supervisor 4,001 - Maximum 6 plus 1 supervisor seating capacity 11231\0001\676371 R A N C H O C U C a M O N G A L CO,IMUNIVY SERVICES SaaffI epo TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director DATE: January 16, 2002 CUCAMONGA AND THE CAUFORNIA SPI:~nWAY CORPORATION APPROVING ATHLET1C FACILmES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the lease agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and California Speedway Corporation for the lease of property owned by the Speedway for development of athletic facilities. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Approximately one year ago the California Speedway approached City staff with a request to develop approximately 26 acres of currently unimproved land as a parking area for major race days at the Speedway. The California Speedway was in the process of acquiring this land in the southeastern part of Rancho Cucamonga, north of Napa Street and east of Etiwanda Avenue. The Speedway was working with San Bernardino County for approval of additional grandstand seating at the race facility. As a condition of approval for this expanded seating, the County required the Speedway to obtain additional parking areas. Speedway representatives informed the City that this parking area would only be used approximately one to four days per year for their major racing events. In discussions between City and Speedway staff relating to the parking area, the Speedway representatives proposed that the City could consider leasing the designated parking area from the Speedway and using that property to develop outdoor athletic facilities for the Rancho Cucamonga community. Both parties felt that this was a positive opportunity since the space would only be used for car parking on a very limited number of days per year. Over the past year, staff and Speedway representatives have been working on development of a lease agreement that would provide for this project. CITY COUNCIL LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA SPEEDWAY CORPORATION JANUARY 16, 2002 The proposed terms of the lease agreement are as follows: 1. The City would lease the Speedway parking area (approximately 35 acres) which is located immediately north of Napa Street and east of Etiwanda Avenue from the California Speedway. 2. The City will develop park and athletic facilities to meet the needs of the residents. The design of the facility must allow for the maximum use of the open space for vehicle parking on Speedway event days. 3. The term of the lease will be for a period of 99 years. 4. The City will pay the California Speedway $1.00 per year for the lease. 5. The City will have exclusive use of the site and the facilities except for a designated minimum number of days per year where the Speedway will use the grounds for overflow vehicle parking on major race days. 6. The City shall be responsible for maintenance and operations of the athletic facilities during its designated periods of use. During those periods of the Speedway's use of the facility for parking, the Speedway will be responsible for maintenance and operational costs. The City has prepared a conceptual design of a soccer field complex for the facility which includes eight soccer fields, restroom facilities, concession area, maintenance area and parking. The City's Park Development Fund 2001/2002 budget includes the funds for developing this project. A copy of the conceptual plan is attached. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal cost to the City will be $1.00 per year for a period of 99 years for the lease agreement. Once the soccer complex is developed, the City will be responsible for operating and maintenance costs for the facility, the majority of which will be recovered from revenues generated from programming, facility rentals, parking fees, etc. rvJcas Director KM/mam Attachments ICouncil&Boards~CityCounciltStaffReports~CalSpeedwayl. ease. 011602 R A N C H O C U C A M O N ~ A 1~ NGINI~I~ I~ IN G L~E 1:3ADTIqI~N T Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer?~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-32, SUBMITTED BY SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF AMETHYST STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 99-32 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 99-32, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Amethyst Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: Sunrise Development, Incorporated 1355 Willow Way, Suite 275 Concord, CA 94520 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 6018923 $46,000 Accept: Maintenance Bond 6018923M $ 4,600 Respectfully submitted, Williar/n J O'Neil City I~ngineer ,.,~.':' !~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOttGA ' .r-~ ~ cOUNTy OF SAN BE.HA, El)Ir'lO ii · STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. O 2 - <~,~ 5' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 99-32, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C h O C U C a M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: T. Harris, Associate Engineerd~{~ James Richard Oaxaca, Engineering TechniL'-ia'n-~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 6075527 IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,653.92, FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 00-052 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 6075527 in the amount of $14,653.92 for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, Contract No. 00-052. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: L.A. Signal 15100 E. Nelson Avenue City of Industry, CA 91744 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 6075527 $14,653.92 Resoectfully submitted, , ~ Willia~ J, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JTH/RO:Is · CCITY OF F~.,,~NC_..I-IO CUCC~f"ION~,:A T~,AFFIC. 51C~N,AL PF~OJEC. T ',/ICINIT¥ M,~,F~ LA GRANDE NT~ []]] Oorn¢lion ~t. a Lo ¥in¢ ~b. \ Lo ®ronct¢ ~t. R A N C H O C U C a M O N G A ~ N C I N E ~ I~ IN G DE PAI~ TM E N T Staff Report DALE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~'~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tech~ician~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE WILSON AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN SEVAINE ROAD TO CHERRY AVENUE, LMD #7, CONTRACT NO. 01-048 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $181,763.22 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Wilson Avenue Landscape Improvements from San Sevaine Road to Cherry Avenue, Contract No. 01-048, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $163,600.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $18,176.32, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $181,763.22. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $181,763.22, which included two contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 11.11%. The original amount approved by Council was $179,946.01 ($163,587.28 plus 10%). Respectfully submitte,d, Willia[~J. O Ne, City Engineer WJO;JAD/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP WILSON AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN SEVAINE ROAD TO CHERRY AVENUE PROJECT LOCATION i Hillside F } .c ...~'/' Banyan i-" Route 30 ion) tgth; bSa,id Ay Base ~ ~ ~eRd Arrow~f t0 Free__w~y ...... ,.> · , _. 4th 8t /TZ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE WILSON AVENUE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FROM SAN SEVAINE ROAD TO CHERRY AVENUE, LMD #7, CONTRACT NO. 01-048 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Wilson Avenue Landscape Improvements from San Sevaine Road to Cherry Avenue, LMD #7, Contract No. 01-048, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. /7.5 ORDINANCE NO. 674 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING AND ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City Council") has adopted, by Ordinance No. 166 on December 23, 1981, the Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan") for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted, by Ordinance No. 316A on August 6, 1987, an amendment to the Plan which increased the financial limitations and included additional public improvements to be undertaken by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted, by Ordinance No. 657 on June 20, 2001, an amendment to extend the time limit for establishing loans, advances and indebtedness by ten years and to include in the Plan five additional public improvement projects to be carried out by the Agency, and WHEREAS, the findings and determinations made by the City Council in the prior ordinances are final and conclusive, no action having been timely brought to question the validity of the Plan or amendments thereto or the findings or determinations of the City Council in adopting the Plan or amendments thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received from the Agency the proposed Amendment No. 3 ("Amendment No. 3") to the Plan, a copy of which is on file at the office of the City Clerk, together with the Agency's Report to City Council including the reasons for Amendment No. 3; and WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment No. 3 would re-establish eminent domain authority in a podion of the Project for twelve years, but would not add any new territory to the Project, modify any other time or fiscal limits applicable to the Project or make any other changes to the Plan; and WHEREAS, a Project Area Committee was not required to be formed in connection with Amendment No. 3 because Amendment No. 3 does not grant authority to the Agency to acquire residential property by emiqent domain, and because Amendment No. 3 does not grant the Agency authority to fund or develop any additional public projects that will displace a substantial number of Iow-income persons or moderate-income persons; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 would have no impact on the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga because it only re-establishes the Agency's power of eminent domain within the Project and the land use plan for redevelopment; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on December 5, 2001, on the adoption of Amendment No. 3 in the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; and 1 WHEREAS, notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date of such joint public hearing, and a copy of said notices and affidavits of publication are on file with the City Clerk and the Agency; and WHEREAS, copies Of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by first class mail to the last known address of each assessee as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of San Bernardino for each parcel of land in the Project Area, and to each resident and business within the Project Area that could be identified through business license and commercial resources not less than thirty days prior to the date of such joint public hearing; and WHEREAS, such notice contained a statement that property located south of Foothill Boulevard between the 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue within the Project would be subject to acquisition by purchase or condemnation under the provisions of Amendment No. 3; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from the property in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Agency and the City have each independently found and determined, based upon the Initial Study prepared with respect to Amendment No. 3 that Amendment No. 3 will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that no mitigation measures are needed, and on that basis a Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act has been prepared with respect to Amendment No. 3; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the report of the Agency, Amendment No. 3, and the Negative Declaration, has provided an oppgrtunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of Amendment No. 3 and has made written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner and taxing entity filed with the City Clerk before the hour set for such joint public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines, based on the evidence in the record, including, but not limited to, the Agency's Report to the City Council on the proposed Amendment No. 3, and all documents referenced therein, and evidence and testimony received at the joint public hearing on adoption of Amendment No. 3 held on December 5, 2001, that: a) Amendment No. 3 conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including, but not limited to, the housing element of the General Plan. b) The implementation of Amendment No. 3 will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will effectuate the purposes and polices of the Community Redevelopment Law. This finding is based on the fact that the continued authority for the acquisition of property through eminent domain will benefit the Project by allowing the Agency to correct conditions of blight and to coordinate public and private actions to stimulate-development and improve the economic and physical conditions of the Project. 2 175' c) The condemnation of real property, as provided for in Amendment No. 3, is necessary to the execution of the Plan, and adequate provisions have been made for the payment for property to be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the need to ensure that the provisions of the Plan will be carried out to prevent the recurrence of blight, and the fact that no property will be acquired until adequate funds are available to pay full compensation therefore. d) Although Amendment No. 3 does not provide for the condemnation of residential property, the Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who might be displaced, temporarily or permanently from housing facilities in the Project Area. The Agency also has a feasible method and plan for its relocation of businesses. This finding is based upon the fact that the Agency has adopted a plan for relocation of families,. persons and businesses by Agency projects, and upon the fact that the Plan provides for relocation assistance according to law, and the fact that such assistance, including relocation payments, constitutes a feasible method for relocation. e) Families and persons shall not be displaced prior to adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to Sections 33411 and 33411.1 of the Health and Safety Code. Dwelling Units housing persons and families of Iow or moderate income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to Sections 33334.5, 33413 and 33413.5 of the Health and Safety Code. Section 2. Written objections to Amendment No. 3 filed with the City Clerk before the hour set for hearing and all written and oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered and, in the case of written objections received from Project Area property owners, residents and businesses and affected taxing agencies, having been responded to, are hereby overruled. Section 3. The Negative Declaration for Amendment No. 3, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Agency and in the office of the City Clerk, having been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby approved and incorporated into this Ordinance by reference and made a part hereof. The Agency shall undertake such additional environmental review or assessment as necessary at the time of the proposed implementation of activities implementing the Plan. The City Clerk shall file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. That certain "Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area," a copy of which is on file in the office of the Agency and the office of the City Clerk, having been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby approved and adopted. The Redevelopment Plan which was adopted by Ordinance No. 166 on December 23, 1981, was amended by the adoption of Ordinance No. 3.16A on August 6, 1987, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 657 on June 20, 2001, and is further amended by Amendment No. 3, is hereby designated, approved and adopted as the official redevelopment Plan for the Project (the "Amended Plan"). Section 8. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Amended Plan hereby approved, this City Council hereby: la) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Amended Plan, lb) requests the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with redevelopment of the Project Area, lc) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Amended Plan, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding, including the expenditure of moneys, necessary to be carried out by the City under the provision of the Amended Plan. Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Amended Plan. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record Amendment No. 3 in the Official Records of San Bernardino County as promptly as practicable. Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation which is published and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Section 9. If any part of this Ordinance or Amendment No. 3 which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of Amendment No. 3, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of the Ordinance or approved the remainder of Amendment No. 3 if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. Section 10. This Ordinance shall be in full fome and effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o the City Council held the day of ,2002, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUN, CILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor City Clerk 4 /-77 TH E CITY O F ~ANCIIO CUCAHONG^ SlaffReport DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT': 2001 AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCI-IEDUL F RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution, which will establish and/or adjust certain fees for Police Department, Engineering Division, Planning Division and the City Clerk's Office. Any fee model is based on a comparison of use, participation and attendance reflective of actual cost. It is analyzed and updated annually. Please see summary schedule for new fees and services. Other fees and services remain unchanged. Also, fee changes have been boldedand italicized in the resolution for your review. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attach. R T' RESOLUTION NO. 02-XXX ~_.. ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPART- MENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-286 A. RECITALS. (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oraJ or written presentations may be made; and (ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been properly provided; and (iii) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City; and (iv) Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk's office to the public on Monday, December 17th, 2001; and (v) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the following fees are estabJished: SECTION 1: BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE,~ 1.0 Buildinq Permit Fees A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work .Fees $1.00 to $1,000.® ............................... $25.® $1,001.°°to $2,® ................................. $25.® for the first $1,000.® plus $2.® for each additional $100.® or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 2 of 53 Total Valuation of Work Fees $2,001.°°to $25,000.® ........................ $45.® for the first $2,000.® plus $7.50 for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.® $25,001.°°to $50,000.® ..................... $217.~° for the first $25,000.® plus $5.50 for each additional $1,000.® of fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.®' $50,001.°°to $100,000.® ...................$355,oo for the first $50,000.® plus $4.® for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.®. $100,000.® and over .......................... $555,oo for the first $100,000.® plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof. 1 .._.~1Plan Review Fees (a) When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of plan submittal. (b) Plan review fees for buildings and structures shall be equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the building permit fees set forth in Section 1.0 herein. (c) Plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the total permit fee as set forth under the pertinent Section 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 herein. (d) Plan review fees for grading shall be as set forth in the following schedule: Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 3 of 53 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 - 100 yards ................................. $50.® 101 - 500 yards ............................... $100.0o 501 - 1,000 yards ............................ $200.oo 1,001 - 2,000 yards ......................... $250.® 2,001 - 3,000 yards ......................... $300.® 3,001 - 4,000 yards ......................... $350.® 4,001 - 5,000 yards ......................... $400.® 5,001 - 10,000 yards ....................... $500.® 10,001 - 50,000 yards ..................... $600.® 50,001 - 100,000 yards ...................$700.® 100,001 yards - and up ...................$900.® The sum of Cut and Fill Yardage shall be used in computing Grading Permit and Plan Checking Fees. (e) Repetitive plan checking of production tract homes that have been previously plan checked and approved under adopted codes may have the plan check fees reduced by 50% (fifty percent). This will only apply to plans when the Design Amhitect submits a letter with his/her wet stamp and signature certifying that plans are identical to the previously approved plans. The new plans shall be wet stamped with a signature of the Design Architect. (f) Additional Plan Checking made necessary due to changes in plans or incomplete plan submission, $55.® per hour for the estimated time of checking revisions. 1.2 Compliance Inspections/Re-inspections Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid building permit or inspections made necessary due to work not being ready at time specified, or work not corrected after prior written correction notice ................................................................................... $30.00 1.3 Cha~ Change of Occupancy Inspection ........................................................ $50.00 1.4 Relocated Buildin.qs Fees for inspection of a structure to be relocated into or within the City shall be $100.® when located within 25 miles of City offices, plus $2.® per mile, round trip, when located more than 25 miles from City offices. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 4 of 53 1.5 Appeal of Abatement Notice An appeal of a Notice to Abate a substandard or dangerous building .............................................................................................. $100.°° 1.~6 Inspection for Temporary Utility Connection or Temporary Occupancy inspection ............................................................................................. $30.00 1.7 Inspections Outside of Normal Business Hours (Minimum charge, four hours) ................................................... $50.® hourly 1.8 Inspections for Which No Permit Fee Is Specifically Indicated (Minimum charge, one-half hour) 50 00 .............................................. $ . hourly 1.9 Electrical Permit Fees (a) Permit Issuance For issuing each permit ...................................................... $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................ $ 4.50 (b) System Fee Schedule NOTE: The following are in addition to permit- issuing fee. New Residential Buildings: The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommemial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot ......................................................... $ .035 For new garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed in conjunction with a new residential building per square foot ...................................... $ .02 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the Unit Fee Schedule. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 5 of 53 Private Swimming Pools, Spas: For new private residential, permanently installed spas, hot tubs or swimming pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each ............................ $30.® For other types of swimming pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Carnivals and Circuses: Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays and attractions. For electric generators and electrically driven rides, Each ................................................................................... $15.® For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting, Each ..................................................................................... $4.$0 For a system of area and booth lighting, each .................... $4.20 For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Services: For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in ratin§, each ...................................................... $18? For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes in ratin§, each ......................... $37.00 For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in ratin§, Each ................................................................................... $75.® Temporary Power Service: For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each ....................................... $15.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 6 of 53 For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each ................................................................. $7.s° (c) Unit Fee Schedule: NOTE: The fo/lowing are in addition to permit issuing fee. Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets: For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20, each .................................... $ .75 Additional outlets, each ....................................................... $ .45 NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures: For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding devices. First 20, each ....................................................... $ .75 Additional fixtures, each ...................................................... $ .45 For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each .......... $ .75 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each .... $ .75 Residential Appliances: For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter- mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self contained room, console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor- operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating, each ...................................................................................... $3.® NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 7 of 53 Non-Residential Appliances: For non-residential appliances and self-contained factory- wired, non-residential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases, drinking fountains, vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each ...................................................................................... $3.® NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Power Apparatus: For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt- amperes (KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR): Up to and including 1, each ................................................. $3.® Over 1 and not over 10, each .............................................. $7.50 Over 10 and not over 50, each .......................................... $15.® Over 50 and not over 100, each ........................................ $30.® Over 100, each ................................................................... $45.® NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. 2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. Busways: For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof ................................................................. $4.50 NOTE: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 8 of 53 Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees: For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each .............................. $15.® For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each ............................ $3.® Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors: For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth ................................................................... $11.00 NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. 1.10 Plumbinq Permits (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................. $4.s° (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fee above) For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and back protection therefore) .................................................... $6.oo For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer ........ $15.® Rainwater systems --per drain (inside building) .................. $6.® For each cesspool (where permitted) ................................ $22.5° For each private sewage disposal system .........................$45.® For each water heater and/or vent ....................................... $7.s° For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps .................$12.® For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water-treating equipment, each ................................ $3.® For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture ........................................................................... $3.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 9 of 53 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including back flow protection devices therefore ................. $9.® For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in lawn sprinkler system: 1 to 5 ................................................................... $7.s° Over 5, each ....................................................... $1 .so For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller .......................................... $7.°° Over 2 inches ................................................... $15.® For each gas piping system of one to four outlets ............... $3.® For each gas piping system of five or more, per outlet ...... $ .75 Swimming pool or spa piping including water heater (not including gas piping) ................................................... $10.® 1.11 Mechanical Permits A fee for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................. $4.s° (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fees above) For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h ....................................................................... $9.® For the installation or relocation or each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h ................................................................................... $11.00 For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent ....................................................................... $9.® For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater ................................................................................... $9.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 10 of 53 For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit ................................................................... $4.50 For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this code ........................................ $9.® For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h ..................................................................................... $9.® For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h ....................... $16.20 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h ............................. $22.50 For installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h ........... $33.5° For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h ................. $56.® For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto ................................................................................ $6.5o NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit which is an integral portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm ....................... $11 .oo For each evaporative cooler other than portable type ......... $6.50 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct ............ $4.20 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 11 of 53 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit ................................................................................. $6.50 For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood ...................................................................................... $6.s0 For the installation or relocation of each domestic- type incinerator ................................................................... $11 .oo For the installation or relocation of each commercial industrial-type incinerator ................................................... $45.® For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code ...................................................................................... $6.50 1.12 Permit Fees A fee for each Grading Permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 cubic yards or less ....................... $15.® 51 to 100 cubic yards ........................ $22.~° 101 to 1,000 cubic yards ................... $22.s° for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.~° for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards .............. $117.® for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.® for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards .......... $198.® for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.s° for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 12 of 53 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 100,001 cubic yards or more ............ $562.5o for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1.13 Application for Plan Duplication Application for duplication processing ................................................ $$0.~ SECTION 2: BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Fees for Business Licenses are found within Title 5 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations and contained in Chapters 5.04, 5.08, 5.12 and 5.16, thereof. SECTION 3: CITY CLERK=S OFFICE FEES 3.1 Municipal Code Municipal Code .................................................................................. $150.® Supplements to the Municipal Code will vary in cost and will be billed accordingly .............................................................................. Amount Variable 3.2 PassDort - Miscellaneous Application Processing Fee ......................................................... $15. oo Photos .......................................................................................... $12.oo SECTION 4: COPYING RATES~ MEDIA AND SUBSCRIPTION FEES Fee Activity Fees Photocopies ....................................... $ .25 per page* Microfilming ....................................... $ .25 per page* $1'°° per plan page Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 13 of 53 Fee Activity Fees Microfiche Jackets ............................. $1.00 per sheet Audio Tape ........................................ $10.® per tape Video Tape ........................................ $10.® per tape Computer Diskettes ........................... $5.® per diskette Subscriptions Fees Council Agenda ................................. $118.® per year Minutes .............................................. $145.® per year Planning Commission Agenda .......... $ 43.~° per year Minutes .............................................. $160.® per year Historic Preservation Comm. Agenda .............................................. $ 9.® per year Engineering Plans and Specifications per set cost ........................................ Amount Variable Mailing Costs for the above (overnight) ........................................ Amount Variable MaplPlan Reproductions ................ $3.oo per sheet FAX Requests - ALL DEPARTMENTS A maximum of 6 pages may be requested ............................. No Fee** *There will be a minimum charge of $1.0o for 1-3 pages ** If material requested is more than 6 pages, material will be mailed and billed at rate established by this Resolution. SECTION 5: ENGINEERING FEES 5.1 Applications Fees Certificate of Compliance .................. $1,190.® Lot L ne Adjustment .......................... $1,190.® Amending Map ............................... $t~ ~90.oo Reapportionment Map ....................... $600.® A two-sheet Parcel/Tract Map; $30.~ for each additional sheet Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 14 of 53 Street Vacation .................................. $1,156.® Standard Agreement/Doc. Processing ......................................... $298.® Release of Lien Agreement .............. $298.® Certificate of Correction .................... $256.® Flood Hazard Letter .......................... $314.® Bond Substitution .............................. $420.® Private Street Designation ................ $495.® Reimbursement Agreement Storm Drain ....................................... $2,227.® Street and Utilities ............................. $2,827.oo Traffic Study Review (Dev. Proj.) ........................................ $751.00 5.2 Map and Plan Checkin.q Fees Fees Property Legal Description ................ $584.® Map Checking Residential Pamel Map ..................... $1,370.® + $180.® per Parcel Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps of 10 lots or less ...........$2,070.oo Tract Maps and Non-Residential Pamel Maps over 10 lots ..................$1,720.® + $35.® per Parcel or Lot 5.:3 Improvement Plans Fees Widening of Existing Streets .............$1.35 per LF + sheet Charge for Interior Streets Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 15 of 53 Interior Streets Fees 1-2 Sheets: ........................................ $1,370.® per sheet 3-5 Sheets: ........................................ $2,740.® + $1,200.® per sheet over 2 sheets 6-10 Sheets: ...................................... $6,340.® + $1,095.® per sheet over 5 sheets 11 or More: ........................................ $11,815.® + $1,025.® per sheet over 10 sheets Storm Drain Plans ............................. Same as for Interior Streets HydroloRy Study Fees Drainage Areas up to 150 Acres ....... $1,370.® Drainage Areas over 150 Acres ........ $2,740.® Landscape and Irrigation Plans for City-Maintained Areas ................. $400.® per sheet For map and plan checking, the fees for rush checking, when approved by the City Engineer, will be 50% greater than those listed above. The fees for checking the revisions to approved plans will be on the basis of actual costs at hourly rates as determined by the City Engineer with a minimum fee of $100.®. 5.4 Public Works Construction Permit Fee 5% of Improvement Cost to $25,000.®, minimum $50.® 4.5% of Improvement Cost for next $75,000.® 4% of Improvement Cost over $100,000.® The Improvement Cost of a project shall be based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate as shown on Surety Bend and as approved by the City Engineer. A refundable deposit is also required. NOTE: Development Impact Fees may also apply and are addressed under separate resolutions. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 16 of 53 5 .._~5 Oversize Loads Fees Single ' * oo Permit .................................... $15. Repetitive ., 00 Permit ............................. $70. initial fee + $15.® per month renewal fee to a maximum of 6 months Annual .. oo Permit .................................. $70. per year · These fees are based on the provisions of the California Vehicle Code Section 35795 and CalTrans Fee Schedule. 5.6 Other Fees Collection of San Bernardino County fees, as adopted by the County, including but not limited to: Documentary Handling Fee for Filing Notice of Determination # Development Review Fees # County Recording Fee County Printing Fee SECTION 6: FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Fire Board 6.1 Plans Checkinq Fees Includes Plan Review and two Inspections. Does NOT include Fee for any required Fire District Permits. A. Start-Up Fee for Commercial, Industrial or Multi-family Dwelling Units, paid prior to TRC .....$82.oo B. Plan Review Fees 1. Single Family Residence ................................................ $132.® 2. Single Family Residential Tract, per Phase .................... $132.® 3. Multi-Family Residential, per Building ............................. $677.® 4. Commercial and Industrial Development, per Building .. $677.® 5. Water Plan/Underground Water Supply ........................ $132.® 6. Conditional Use Permit ................................................... $132.® 7. Minor Development Review ............................................ $132.® 8. Pamel Map Review ......................................................... $132.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 17 of 53 9. Tenant Improvement; per hour, one hour minimum .......... $87.® 10. Special Events Review ....................................................... $87.® 11. Accessory Plans Review: Aisles, Access, Seating, Etc .............................................. $66.00 12. Alternate Method Approval ................................................ $92.® 13. Revision to existing Plan (e.g., As-Builts, Excluding TI Plans) ................................. $92.® 14. New Fire Sprinkler Systems, Standpipes or over ten heads ......................................... $164.00 15. Fire Sprinkler Alteration, ten heads or less ........................ $92.® 16. Pre-Engineered Fire Protection Systems ....................... $147.® 17. Fire Detection and Alarm Systems ................................. $154.® 18. Flammable Finishes Spray Booth, per booth ................. $164.® 1 9. LPG Tank Installation Review, per tank ......................... $147.00 Underground Storage Tank Removal Review, per tank ............................................................................ $147.® 21. Flammable & Combustible Liquid, Tank & Piping .......... $147.® 22. Failure to keep Appointment, one hour minimum .............. $66.® 23. Microfilm Charges, per page ................................................ $1.00 24. Minor Plan Review not requiring a District Inspection .... No Fee C. Inspection Fees Perhour, one hour minimum 1. Field Inspection required after the Initial and Follow-Up Inspection ............................................... $110.® 2. Failure to keep an Inspection Appointment ....................... $66.® 3. Field Inspection of Self-Inspection Occupancies, Failure to Comply ............................................................... $66.® 4. Fire Flow Test, Witness Test ............................................. $87.® 5. Unscheduled Field Inspection or Investigation .................. $66.® 6. Same Day, Short Notice Inspection ................................... $87.® 6.2 I. Permit Fees [initial Permit and subsequent renewal of Permit unless otherwise indicated (e.g. one time only Permit activity)] A.Permits 1. General Use Permit ............................................................ $82.® 2. Access Control ................................................................ No Fee 3. Aerosol Products (more than 500 lbs. of Level 2 or 3)... $131.00 4. Aimraft Refueling Vehicles ................................................. $95.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 18 of 53 5. Aircraft Repair Hangar ....................................................... $84.® 6. Automobile Wrecking Yard ................................................ $82.® 7. Asbestos Removal .......................................................... $132.® 8. Bowling Pin or Alley Refinishing involving Flammable Finishes ........................................................... $82.® 9. Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas ..... NOT PERMITTED 10. Carnivals and Fairs (see also 6.2E) ................................ $132.00 11. Cellulose Nitrate Film ......................................................... $82.® 12. Cellulose Nitrate Storage, more than 25 lbs ...................... $84.® 13. Combustible Fiber Storage, more than 100 cubic feet ...... $82.® 14. Combustible Material Storage, more than 2,500 cubic feet ............................................. $115.® 15. Compressed Gases: a. Corrosive, 200 cubic feet or more ................................. $95.® b. Flammable, 200 cubic feet or more ...............................$84.® c. Highly Toxic, any amount .............................................. $95.® d. Inert/Simple Asphyxiant, 6,000 cubic feet or more ....... $85.® e. Irritant, 200 cubic feet or more ...................................... $84.® f. Other Health Hazards, 650 cubic feet or more ............. $84.® g. Oxidizing (includes Oxygen), 504 cubic feet or more ._$84.® h. Pyrophoric, any amount ................................................. $95.® i. Radioactive, anyamount ............................................... $98.® j. Sensitizer, 200 cubic feet or mor(~ ................................. $95.® k. Toxic, any amount ......................................................... $95.® I. Unstable (Reactive), any amount ............................... $132.® 16. Commercial Rubbish-Handling Operations ....................... $84.® 17. Cryogens: a. Corrosive -- Inside, over 1 gallon .................................. $95.® b. Corrosive -- Outside, over I gallon .............................$95.® c. Flammable -- Inside, over 1 gallon ................................ $84.® d. Flammable -- Outside, 60 gallons or more .................... $84.® e. Highly toxic -- Inside, over 1 gallon ............................... $95.® f. Highly toxic -- Outside, over 1 gallon ............................ $95.® g. Nonflammable -- Inside, 60 gallons or more ................. $95.® h. Nonflammable -- Outside, 500 gallons or more ............ $84.® i. Oxidize -- Inside, 50 gallons or more ............................ $84.® j. Oxidizer -- Outside, 50 gallons or more ........................ $84.® 18. Dry Cleaning Plants ........................................................ $132.® 19. Dust-Producing Operations ................................................ $84.00 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 19 of 53 20. Explosives or Blasting Agents: a. Storage, Manufacture, Process or Sell ........................ $84.® b. Use ............................................................................ $150.® 21. Fire Hydrants and Water-Control Valves, use for other purposes ..................................................... $ 84.® 22. Fire Protection Systems and Equipment, per building ... No Fee 23. Fireworks: a. Retail Sales ...................................................... NOT PERMITrED b. Aerial Displays (see also 6.2E) .................................... $84.® 24. Flammable or Combustible Liquids: a. Pipeline, to Use, Operate, Repair or modify a Pipeline ....................................... $132.® b. Class I Liquids, more than 5 gallons Inside a Building .......................... $84.® c. Class I Liquids, more than 10 gallons Outside a Building ..................... $84.® Exceptions to b. & c.: 1. Storage or use of Class I Liquids in Vehicle, Vessel, Aircraft or Equipment Fuel Tanks. 2. Storage or use of Paints, Oils, Vamishes, or Similar Mixtures for Maintenance, Painting or Similar Purposes for less than 30 days. d. Class II or II-A Liquids, more than 25 Gallons Inside a Building .....................$ 84.® e. Class II or IlI-A Liquids, more than 60 gallons Outside of a Building ............... $ 84.® f. To remove Class I or II Liquids from an UST by other than Normal Operation ........... $ 95.® g. installation, Construction, Alteration or Operation where Flammable or Combustible Liquids are Produced, Processed, Transported, Stored, Dispensed or Used in any of the following: Tank Vehicles ......................................................... $95.® Equipment ........................................................... $105.® Tanks, per tank .................................................... $121.00 Plants ................................................................... $132.® Terminals ............................................................. $132.® Wells, per well ...................................................... $ 84.® Fuel-Dispensing Stations (Single and/or Multiple Pump Stations) ....................................... $ 95.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 20 of 53 Refineries ............................................................ $132.® Distilleries ............................................................ $132.® h. Installation, Alteration, Removal, Abandon, Place Temporarily out of Service or otherwise Dispose of a tank which contained Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.°° i. To change the type of contents in a Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.® 25. Fruit Ripening .................................................................. $105.® 26. Fumigation or Thermal Insecticidal Fogging ................... $121.00 27. Hazardous Materials: (see also other Permit Sections) For multiple Permits within this Section 25, the Fee will be the total of all related Permits to a maximum of $400.® or Actual Costs, whichever is greater. a. Carcinogens, 10 lbs. or more .................................... $132.® b. Corrosive Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................... $84.® c. Corrosive Solids, 500 lbs. or more ............................... $95.® d. Flammable Solids, 100 lbs. or more ............................ $95.® e. Highly Toxic Liquids and Solids, any amount .............. $95.00 f. Irritant Liquids, 55 gallons or more .............................. $84.® g. Irritant Solids, 500 lbs. or more .................................... $84.® h. Oxidizing Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® i. Oxidizing Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® j. Organic Peroxide Liquids and Solids: Class 1, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Class 4, 20 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.00 k. Other Health Hazards: Liquids, 55 gallons or more .......................................... $84.® Solids, 500 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 21 of 53 I. Pyrophoric Liquids, anyamount .................................. $95.® m. Pyrophoric Solids, any amount .................................... $95.® n. Sensitizer Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................... $95.® o. Sensitizer Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® p. Toxic Liquids, 10 gallons or more ................................ $95.® q. Toxic Solids, 100 lbs. or more ...................................... $95.® r. Unstable (Reactive) Liquids: Class 4, any amount ................................................. $132.® Class 3, any amount ................................................. $132.® Class 2, 5 gallons or more ........................................ $132.® Class 1, 10 gallons or more ...................................... $132.® s. Unstable (Reactive) Solids: Class 4, any amount ................................................. $132.® Class 3, any amount ................................................. $132.® Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................ $132.® Class 1,100 lbs. or more .......................................... $132.00 t. Water-Reactive Liquids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, 5 gallons or more ........................................... $95.® Class 1, 10 gallons or more ......................................... $95.® u. Water-Reactive Solids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Class 1,100 lbs. or more ............................................. $95.® 25. Hazardous Production Materials for H-6 Occupancies .. $132.® 29. High Piled Combustible Storage ........................................ $99.® 30.Liquefied Petroleum Gases; Store, Use, Handle er Dispense .................................. $84.°o 31~ Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings .............................. $105,® 32. Lumber Yards ..................................................................... $84,® 33. Magnesium Workings ...................................................... $121.00 34, Mall, Covered (see also 6.211D4) ....................................... $84.® 35. Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Stations ......................... $100,00 36. Open Burning .................................................................. No Fee 37. Organic Coatings ............................................................. $132.® 38. Ovens: Industrial Baking or Drying ................................... $84.® 39. Pallet Storage ..................................................................... $84.® Resolution No. 02oXXX Page 22 of 53 40. Places of Assembly: a. A-4 Stadiums, Reviewing Stands and Amusement Park .................... $84.® b. A-3 Occupant Load of 50 to 299 without a Stage ........$95.® c. A-2.1, Occupant Load of 300 or more without a Stage ................................. $147.® d. A-2 Occupant Load of less than 1000 with a Stage .................................. $169.® e. A-1 Occupant Load of 1000 or more with a Stage .................................... $225.® 41. Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (See also 6.2E) ................................................................... $84.® 42. Radioactive Materials ...................................................... $132.® 43. Refrigeration Equipment ................................................. $115.® 44. Repair Garages .................................................................. $84.® 45. Spraying or Dipping ............................................................ $84.® 46. Tents, Canopies and Temporary Membrane Structures: a. 201 to 400 square feet ................................................. $84.® b. 401 to 1500 square feet ............................................ $110.® c. 1501 to 15,000 square feet ....................................... $147.00 d. 15,001 to 30,000 square feet .................................... $178.00 e. Over 30,000 square feet ........................................... $210.® 47. Tire Storage ..................................................................... $132.® 48. Welding and Cutting Operations ...................................... $ 84.® II. Special Services A. Excessive or Malicious False Alarms causing Response of Fire Apparatus. 1. Response due to AFailure to Notifya the Fire Department when working on or testing Sprinkler or Fire Alarm System. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding 1/2 hour, minimum charge, 2. Malicious False Alarms. $153.0o per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 23 of 53 3. Response Due to Alarm Malfunction. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding to all False Alarms in excess of two (2) False Alarms in 30 days with 1/2 hour, minimum charge, 4. Response to False Alarms due to negligence, tampering with the system, construction or modification of the building. $153.°° per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 5. Response to False Alarm by Battalion Chief and/or Fire Inspector. $50.~° per hour with 1/2 hour, minimum charge, C. Response to Fire Setter Incidents (Juvenile or Adult) and ADUI@ Callouts: 1. Cost Recovery for Emergency Apparatus responding. $2.50 per minute per piece of Equipment. 2. Cost Recovery for Personnel responding. $ .83 per minute per Person. 3. Cost Recoveryfor Battalion Chief or Fire Investigator responding. $ .45 per minute. D. Response to mitigate Extended Hazardous Chemical and Material Incidents beyond Normal Service requires (this includes response to railroad properties, freeways, and aircraft crashes). 1. Hazardous Incident, Overhead and Command, per hour. $273.°° per hour per piece of Apparatus 2. Apparatus and Crews assigned to the Incident, per hour. $170.~° per hour per piece of Equipment 3. Specialized Resources - HAZMAT Crews and Equipment. Actual Costs 4. Materials and Supplies used for the Incident. Actual Costs Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 24 of 53 E. Special Activities - Apparatus and Crews assigned to activities that require the services, at Permittees expense, of one or more standby Firefighters. $153.°~ per hour per piece of Apparatus $ 30.0o per hour, two-hour minimum per District employee, two-hour minimum charge. F. Accelerant Detection Canine Team, Use of Arson K-9 Team by other Agencies. Fire Scene Examinations: $50.00 per hour, two-hour minimum charge Hourly Travel Rate: $25.00 per hour, one-hour minimum, to and from Search Area Mileage, round trip ................................................ $ .35 mile Administrative Reports ................................ $25.00 per hour Mounted Photographs .......................................... $1.s° each G. Board of Appeals Requiring a Special Meeting ..................................... $245.00 SECTION 7: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FEES Request Fees GIS Data, Digital Format ................... $37.® per hour plus costs otmaterial(s) Plots ............................................. $30.® CD ROMS .................................... $1.0o Diskettes ...................................... $ .30 ZIP Disc ....................................... $10.0o JAZ Disc ...................................... $90.® 4mm Tape .................................... $29.® Zoning Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............ $30.® Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" BNV Plan Map (Vicinity) ......$1.0o Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" Color Plan Map (Vicinity) ..... $5.® General Plan Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............ $30?0 Flood Plain Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............ $30.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 25 of 53 Request Fees Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide ...... $25.00 Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Residential .. $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report- Commercial/industrial ....................... $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report- Specific Plan ..................................... $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide 34 X 44" Color, 2 "E" Size Sheets .............................. $50.® Special Reports and/or Maps ........... Time and Materials + $500.® Deposit SECTION 8: LIBRARY FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Library Board of Trustees Fines Fines are based on item rather than patron. For example: A child borrowing adult materials will be assessed an adult overdue fine. Overdue Fine Per Item: Fine Borrowing Per Day Maximum Thresholds Adult .............. $ .25 ..................... $1 0.o0 ................... $5.® Children ......... $ .10 ..................... $ 5.® .................... $5.® Video ............. $1 .o0 ..................... $1 0.00 ................... - ....... Best Seller Videos ............ $2.® ..................... $1 0.® ................... - ....... DVD ............... $2.® ..................... $10.® ................... - ....... CD/ROM Software ........ $2.® ..................... $1 0.00 ................... - ....... Magazine ....... $ .10 ..................... $1 .oo .................... _ ....... Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 26 of 53 Rental Fees Per Item: Loan Per Item Rental Fee Period Type Limit Video ............. $1.00 ..................... 7 days .................. 8 video titles, total Business Series Video ............. $2.® ..................... 3 days .................. 8 video titles, total Best Seller Videos ............ $2.® ..................... 3 days .................. 8 video titles, total DVD ............... $2~00 ..................... 7 days .................. 4 DVD titles, total Best Seller DVD ............... $2.oo ..................... 3 days .................. 4 DVD titles, total Audio Cassette ........$ .25/cassette ......14 days ................ 4 audio cassette titles $2.® max. CD .................. $ .25 ..................... 14 days ................ 4 CD titres Best Seller CD .................. $ .50 ..................... 14 days ................ 4 CD titles Read Alongs .. $ .25/cassette ...... 1 4 days ................ 4 Read Along titles Best Seller Rental Books. $1.00 ..................... 7 days .................. 4 books/No Reserves CD/ROM Software ........$2.® ..................... 7 days .................. 4 CD/ROM titles Test/Deposit Books ............. $20.00 Refundable Deposit Charged -- Checks Allowed; Credit Card Allowed Fees for Services: Interlibrary Loan ................................ $2.® Reserves ........................................... $ .50 Marketing Library Card ...................... $3.® Lost Library Card ............................... $2.® for regular card $3.® for marketing card Collection Fee ................................... $1 5.® per account Test Monitoring Fee .......................... $10.® per test session Temporary Card ................................ $ .50 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 27 of 53 Technolo.qy Center: Fee In-house Computer Rental ................ $3.® per hour Technology Classes Fee Internet Basic Searching ................... $15.® per class Internet Intermediate Searching ....... $15.® per class Internet Advanced Searching ............ $15.® per class Printouts: Fee Color .................................................. $ .30 B/W .................................................... $ .10 Photocopies: Fee Color Photocopies ............................. $ .75 BAN Photocopies: Coin ................................................... $ .15 Debit Card ......................................... $ .10 Microform Copies .............................. $ .15 Research/Business Services: Fee Business Locator Services ................$5.® per business, no charge if business is not located Brief Business Profile ........................ $10.o0 per business, no charge if business is not located Each additionaJ profile, $6.® Business Lists on Demand ............... ~; .05,~cents per record, $10.® minimum On line Data Base Searches ............. Cost of Online Connect Time + $5.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 28 of 53 Lost Materials: Item Item Cost Processinq Fee Books ............. Original Cost .............. + $5.® Media ............. Original Cost .............. + $6.® Paperback Books ............. Original Cost .............. + $2.s° Magazines ..... $3.® ........................... + $1.00 Dama.qed Materials: Type of Damaqe/Loss Processin.q Fee Bar Code Removed ........................... $2.® Book(s) ............................................. List Cost in Computer Cover Damaged .......................... $5.00 Plastic Cover Damaged .............. $2?o Page Torn .................................... $1.00 per page Compact Disc(s) .............................. List Cost in Computer Broken Jewel Case: Singles ......................................... $1 .so Doubles ........................................ $3.® Loss of Liner Notes ........................... $5.® Loss of Book/Pamphlets ...................$5.® Video Cassette(s) ............................ List Cost in Computer Shell Replacement ...................... $5.® Storage Case Damage ................ $5.® Audio Book(s) ................................. List Cost in Computer Double Case ................................ $5.® 4 Storage Case ...........................$6.® 12 Storage Case ......................... $7.® Cassette Boxes ...........................$1.00 SECTION 9: PLANNING FEES 9.1 Applications Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre amount, with a maximum set at three times the base fee. Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Tentative Tract Map ....................... $2,987?o .............. $60.® per d/u .......$8,961 .oo Tentative Parcel Map ..................... s2,. , 4.- ............. No.o,, ................. , 4. - _ __ Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 29 of 53 Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Conditional Use Permit ....................... $2,921 .o0 .............. $292.® per acre... $8,763.® Development/Design Review- Residential (5 or more) ....................... $2,851.00 .............. $57.® per d/u .......$8,553.® Development/Design Review- Commercial/Industrial ....................... $2,851 .oo .............. $285.® per acre... $8,553.® Initial Study ....................... $225.® ................. $22.® per acre ..... $675.® General Plan Amendment ....................... $2,866.® .............. $287.® per acre... $8,598.® Specific/Commercial Plan Amendment. * ....................... $2,866.® .............. $287.® per acre... $8,598.® Development District Amendment* ....................... $2,866.® .............. $287.® per acre... $8,598.® · Should be charged at half rate if filed in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment. 9.__2 Applications Those charged on a time-and-materials basis with a deposit taken up front. Application Deposit Amount EIR Review - Sensitive ............................ $10,000.® Development Agreement Review ........... $5,000.® Mitigation Plan - Complex ....................... $1,000.® Annexation .............................................. $2,000.® Development Agreement ........................$2,000.® New Specific/Community Plan ................ $10,000.® EIR Preparation ....................................... $5,000.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 30 of 53 9.3 Other Application Fees Application Fee Non-Construction CUP ............................ $435.® Uniform Sign Program ............................. $580.o0 Minor Exception ....................................... $170.® Dev/Design Review: 4 du's or tess ........................................... $1,027.® Variance .................................................. $871 .oo Variance: 4 du's or less ........................................... $291 .o0 Use Determination .................................. $315.® Preliminary Review ................................. $325.® Minor Development Review .................... $298.® Time Extension ........................................ $549.® Minor Time Extension ............................. $136.® Sign Permit .............................................. $51 .oo Hillside Development Review , 00 5 or more du s .......................................... $1,462. Hillside Development Review 4 or less du's ........................................... $244.® Temporary Use Permit ............................ $88.® Temporary Use Permit Model Home... $219.oo EIR Review Only ..................................... $2,370.® Landmark Application .............................. $728.® Residential and Small Business ............. No ,Cee Landmark Alteration ................................ $835.® Residential and Small Business ............. No ,Cee Mills Act Application ................................ $724~oo Residential and Small Business ............. No ,Cee Mitigation Plan (Simple) .......................... $719.® Mitigation Plan (Complex) ....................... (See 9.2) Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 31 of 53 9.4 Appeal Fees Application Fee Appeal of a City Planner Decision .......... $62.oo Apj~eal of a Commission Decision o0 in t.,onnection with an Application ........... $126. Appeal of a Tract Map ......................... $25~.°° or Parcel Map 9..~5 Other Fees Application Fee Pre-application Review (Planning Commission) ........................... $325.® Entertainment Permit .............................. $571 Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit ......... $571 .oo Home Occupation Permit ........................ $53.® Large Family Day Care Permit ................ $170.® Public Convenience or Necessities (Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses) ................................................................. $315.® Recycling Facilities Permit ...................... $296.® Status Map Application ........................... $15.® Trail Easement Vacation ......................... $1,190.® Tree Removal/New Development ........... $432.® Tree Removal/Existing Development ................................................................. $72.0o Land Use Verification Report .................. $25.® NOTE:Planning Division Fees for documents, which are individually priced, are contained in the Document Price List. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 32 of 53 SECTION 10: RECREATION FEES Following are current fees for recreation activities and rentals. All consumable costs are to be recovered. Definition of classes of fees by groups. GROUP 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co- sponsored events; other governmental agencies, including public schools serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. GROUP 2: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations which are located and based in the City whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidate's information night. GROUP 3: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations and churches which have paid management and are located and based in the City. GROUP 4: City resident private party activity; City resident employee organizations; City resident political candidate use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. GROUP 5: City resident commercial, business, profit-making, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. GROUP 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making organizations and churches. Neiqhborhood and Communit_v Park Li(;hted SPorts Venu~ Fee= All Rancho Cucamonga based youth sports organizations which are recreation in nature and meet an overall residency rate of a minimum of 80% will have their light fee waived in full. Other sports organizations will pay their light fee in full (100%) for the electrical costs only. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 33 of 53 Classes/Workshops/Proqrams Classes and workshops shall be structured on a cost-covering basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland. Non-Resident Charge A $5.® fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Does not include one-day activities or any trips sponsored by the City. Facility Rentals Hourly fees for Monday through 5 p.m., Friday use as follows: Friday, 5 p.m. and later, Saturday, Sunday and holiday use will be charged the 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. rate. Buildinq Rentals (Hourly) GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME I 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.® $8.® $25.® $30.® $30.® Small 5pm-8am & None $12.® $12.® $35.® $40.® $40.® Weekends NOTE: Patio at Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center shall be rented only as a small room at 8am-5pm rate. GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME 1 2 3 4 5 6 Large* 8am-5pm None $12.® $12.oo $40.® $45.® $45.® Large* 5pm-8am & None $20.® $20.® $50.® $55.® $55.00 Weekends * Four-hour minimum charge for large room use on Friday and Saturday nights. NOTE: All non-profit community based youth organizations are permitted one free board or membership meeting per month. Room use for registration purposes is also free of charge. Groups who require room use beyond the above criteria are charged the group 2 and 3 building rental hourly fees. .2// Resolution No, 02-XXX Page 34 of 53 Facility Decoratinq Discount Rooms may be reserved for up to two (2) hours prior to and after the event at the rate of 50% of the normal room rental rate for the purposes of set-up and removal of decorations. Kitchen (Hourly) GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 None $5.® $5.® $10.® $10.® $15.® Lions West~ Ceramic Room Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 No hourly fee $50.® $75.® Materials Actual costs Actual cost Actual cost Staff $10.® $10.® $10.® Other Fees: If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.® per hour for staff time. When a damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.®. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City=s liability exposure. Per Day Fees Rental Item Fee Coffee Pot (small) ............................. $5.® Coffee Pot (large) .............................. $15.® Copy Service ..................................... $ .05 per page Flip Chart/Easel ................................. $20.® Microphone ........................................ $10.® PA System (small) ............................. $40.® Piano* (see Note:) ............................. $25.® Podium with PA ................................. $40.® Professional Lighting ......................... $40.o0 Tree or Spot .2/2 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 35 of 53 Rental Item Fee Staff for Lighting ................................ $10.® hourly Projector/Overhead ........................... $10.® ProjectodSlide ................................... $20.® Stage (large) ...................................... $50.® Stage (small) ..................................... $20.® TV. with Video Player ........................ $20.® White Board with Easel ..................... $10.® * The piano is tuned by the City twice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost. COMMUNITY AMPHITHEATER The following are rental fees for Amphitheaters, The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for Groups 2 and 3. Community Amphitheater Fees GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Stage (Flat Fee) None $25.® $25.® $72.® $80.oo $95.® Staff: Sound Monitor None $10.® $10.oo $10.® $10.® $10.® (Hourly) Equestrian Center Fees - Room Rental (Hourly) * Fees and Charges will be as follows: GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME 1 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.® $8.® $25.® $30.® $30.® Small 5pm-Sam None $12.® $12.® $35.® $40.® $40.® Daily Snack Bar ** None $5.® $5.® SfO. O~ $10,oo $15.o0 Kitchen Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 36 of 53 GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Annual Shared Storage Fee N/C $75.® N/A N/A N/A N/A Equestrian Center Lights *** 100% Actual Energy Consumption * Includes use of P.A. System. ** A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.) *** The small arena will have a coin-metered box for electrical cost recovery. Storage For City Community Centers and Public Facilities, no storage will be provided to groups on an ongoing basis without the approval of the Community Services Director. Some City parks may be reserved for use. Rental fees for picnic shelters located in these parks are as follows: Picnic Shelter (Hourly) GROUP SHELTER SIZE I 2 3 4 5 6 Small None $3.® $3.® $5.® $8.® $8.® Large None $5.® $5.® $8.® $12.oo $12.® Lions West Park Ar~a (Hourly) To accommodate activities at Lions East and West Community Centers, park open space located adjacent to Lions West Community Center may be reserved in conjunction with a building room rental at either facility. When such a rental occurs, the following fees shall be assessed. GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $5.oo $5.® $8.® $12.® $12.oo Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 37 of 53 Civic Center Courtyard (Hourly) Rental of the Civic Center Courtyard provides renter with use of the Rains Conference Room, the restrooms and one staff member. If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.® per hour per staff member. When damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.®. At the discretion of the Community Service Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to the event/rental requirements and the City=s liability exposure. The following are rental fees for the Civic Center Courtyard: GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $20.® $20.® $50.® $55.® $55.® Street Banner Disnlav Fees Installation/Removal .......................... $75.® per banner Administrative Fee ............................ $50.® If the City becomes involved in creation and preparation of the banner NOTE:Applicant is still responsible for the actual cost of banner (payable in advance). Mobile Lift Fees Lift Service ......................................... $300.® Plus the cost of 2-Staff Members for the full time frame of the event. ($10.® hourly per Staff Member.) NOTE:Equipment is available for rent only for events conducted on City property and would require 2 part-time Staff Members to deliver, operate and return the equipment. EPICENTER TOURNAMENT AND LEAGUE FEES; Rental Fees (Per Field) GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-6 Field Rental* 2 Hours and Less $35.® $100.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 38 of 53 GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-6 4 Hours and Less $70.® $200.® All Day $140.00 $265.°° All 3-Fields/Ail day N/A $695.® Deposit $250.® $400.® Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost * Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. When additional City staffing, equipment and material are required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Epicenter Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event- related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community and Neiqhborhood Park Lea,ques and Tournaments Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $10.® per hour per staff member required. Applicant is also required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Softball Field & Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues and Tournaments* GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4 ** GROUP 5-6 ** 2 Hours and Less None $20.® $50.® 4 Hours and Less None $35.® $90.® All Day None $85.® $160.® * A $5.~° non-resident fee will be assessed per non-resident team per tournament. All other rental fees are still applicable. ** A $200.°~ refundable security, damage, cleaning, performance deposit is required. Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses, This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 39 of 53 Rental Fees (Per Field) GROUP 1-6 Drag and Line* Actual Cost * Drag and Line fees include staff costs and are for one drag and line per field. GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-6 Bases* $20.® $40.® * Bases are available only when renting the fields for a tournament. Fee is based on per field, per day, basis subject to availability by City. Snack Bar For City-Owned snack barn located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 Seasonal None $450.® N/A Other non-protit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers) will be charged a fiat $300.0oseasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City-Sponsored event. Storage For City-Owned storage located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 Seasonal None $75.® N/A R.C. FAMILY SPORT~ CENTER RENTAL FEE,~ -- Athletic Use ONLY Basketball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 2 Hours and Less None $40.® $50.® 4 Hours and Less None $75.® $90.® 6 Hours and Less None $100.® $120.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 40 of 53 GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 Staff: 2 Persons None $20.® $20.® (Hourly) Refundable None $200.® $200.® Cleaning/Damage Deposit Racquetball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 3 Hours and Less None $45.® $60.00 6 Hours and Less None $75.® $90.® Staff: 2 Persons None $20.® $20.® (Hourly) Refundable None $200.® $200.® Cleaning/Damage Deposit R.C. Sports Center Teen Center Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 Rental Fee: 2 Hour Minimum None $40.® $50.® Staff: 1 Staff, 1-30 Persons None $10.® $10.® (Hourly) 2 Staff, 30 + Persons None $20.® $20.® (Hourly) Refundable None $200.® $200.® Cleaning/Damage Deposit EPICENTER STADIUM COMPLEX FEFR Stadium Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events a. Stadium Rental $1,500.® per day $2,000.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 41 of 53 Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events b. Sky Box Rental Rate $50.oo per hour $50?o per hour c. Cafe3 Area Rental Rate $50?0 per hour $50.® per hour d. Pavilion Area Rental Rate i. Covered Pavilion $50.oo per hour $30.® per hour 3rd Base side ii. Open Pavilion $25? per hour $15.® per hour 1st Base side e. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parkin.q Lot Events Ticketed Events * Non-Ticketed Events a. Stadium On-Site Lots i. Rental rates for $500.® per day $670.® per day Parking Lots plus 10% of gross A, B, C ticket sales ii. Rental rates for $250.® per day $ 335.® per day Parking Lets plus 10% of gross D, E, F ticket sale b. Expanded Parking Lots i. Parking Let #1 $500.® per day $670.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales ii. Parking Lot #2 $250.® per day $335.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales iii. Parking Lot #3 $1,500.® per day $2,000?o per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales OR iii. Event Quadrant $250.® per day $335.® per day A-F plus 10% of gross ticket sales c. Event Expenses Applicant is required to pay event-related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. 2 ~'~' Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 42 of 53 Parkin.q Fees ** a. Baseball Events Option to charge: $2.® per car; $15.® per bus b. Concerts and Option to charge: $3.® to $5.® per car; $5.® to Special Events $10.o0 VIP per car; $15.® per bus, depending on event c. Parking Lot Events Option to charge: $2.® to $5.® per car Concessions a. Food and Beverage 20% of gross sales 10% for non-profit organizations b. Merchandise and 20% of gross sales to be negotiated Novelties (Books, Novelties, 10% for non-profit organizations Tapes, CD's, Programs, T-Shirts, etc.) Miscellaneous a. Commercial Filming Minimum of $1,000.oo to $4,000.® per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services b. Commercial Filming Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, in Parking Lot depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services c. Commercial Photograph Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, depending on photography requirements, plus actual costs for City services d. Location Credit Required e. Deposit Minimum of $500.® to $2,500.® per day, depending upon event/rental requirements. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. f. Additional Move-in/ 50% of daily event rental rate Move-Out Days g. Tent/Canopy Main- Minimum of $300.® to $1,000.® per event tenance Reserve Fee depending upon event/rental requirements. * Based on Provisions of Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates apply to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (Lot A) delineated in the lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. 22'b Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 43 of 53 SECTION 11: RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT FEES Description Fete Fingerprinting .................................... $10.oo per card Criminal Reports ................................ $20.oo Traffic Accident Reports .................... $20.® Traffic Accident Reports - Mail ..........$20.® Criminal History Letters ..................... $15.® Bicycle License .................................. $3.® Special Event Jobs *. ........................ NO FEE Costs Associated with Towing and Releasing Stored or Impounded Vehicles .......... $75.® Repossession Vehicle Release Fee. $15.® Citation Proof of Correction ** ........... $15.® Copy of citation or other document - Not A Report .................................. $5.°0 Deputy Reserve .............................. $3'/.~ hourly Deputy II ........................................ $57.~ hourly Sergeant ........................................ $64.~ hourly * There is no fee for special events. However, if security services are required for the event such as regular or reserve officers, or private security, these fees are separate. ** This fee will not apply to persons residing or working within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or citations issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Police. SECTION 12: MISCELLANEOUS FEES Description Fee Calculation for 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts ....................... $7.s° Amendment to Tax Statements for Prepaid Assessments ................ $20.® 221 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 44 of 53 Description Fe__e B,ngo L~cense ................................... $50. Industrial Bond Development Bond Application ............................... A fee of 1/4 of 1% of the established maximum amount of the proposed bond application and not less than $1,250.00 Dog Licensing ................................... (See Resolution 81-79) Filming Permits: Application Fee (See Planning Fees) ........................................................... $129.® Basic Fee for each day of filming ...... $132.00 Business License Tax ....................... $20.® Investigation Fee ............................... $110.00 per filming day · 00 F~re Department ................................ $100. per hour * Massage Establishment Application $225.® Renewal ............................................. $111 .oo Massage Outcall Service .................. $90.® Renewal ............................................. $45.® Massage Technician Application ...... $178.® Renewal ............................................. $90.® Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Appeal Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code) .. $300.® Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Filing Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code) .. $15.® Police Department** ....................... (See Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department Fees) School Fees ..................................... (See Ordinance Nos. 69-C and Ordinance No. 74 regarding these fees) 222 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 45 of 53 Description Fee Solicitor, Non-profit, Identification Badge ........................... $5.® each Taxicab Driver's Permit Application. $120.® Renewal ............................................. $60.® Taxicab Service Application ............. $95.® Renewal ............................................. $45.® *Per Hour for each 3-man piece of equipment ** Number and type of personnel is determined by the Station Commander after reviewing plans for the event C. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2002. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN ED: William J. Alexander, Mayor A'I-I'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 46 of 53 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CiTY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on this day of 2002. Executed this __ day of 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 47 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 3 - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSEDE FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Passports Application Processing O $15.0o N/A NEW FEE Fee for the City of Set by Rancho Cucamonga Federal Government Passports Set of 2" X 2" O $12.® N/A NEW FEE Polaroid Color Comparable to what ID Photos other cities charge Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 48 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 5 - ENGINEERING DIVISION SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Copying Rates, Media Map/Plan Not Listed $3.® per sheet N/A To cover cost of paper and Subscription Fees Reproductions NEWFEE SECTION 4 Applications Tentative Parcel Map $2,514.® $2,514.® N/A Transfer to Planning SECTION 5.1 Applications Initial Study $225.® $225.® N/A Transfer to Planning SECTION 5.1 Applications Time Extension $549.® $549.® N/A Transfer to Planning SECTION 5.1 Applications Tentative Parcel $251.0o $251 .oo N/A Transfer to Planning SECTION 5.1 Map Appeal Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 49 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 9 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Other Application Fees Temporary Use $219.0o $219.® 0% Change Wording SECTION 9.3 Permit Model Home Applications Tentative Parcel Map 2~ $2,514.® N/A Transfer from SECTION 9.1 Engineering Applications Initial Study $225.® $225.® N/A Transfer from SECTION 9.1 Engineering Fee Already Addressed in Planning Fee Schedule Other Application Fees Time Extension $549.® $549.® N/A Transfer from SECTION 9.3 Engineering Fee Already Addressed In Planning Fee Schedule Appeal Fees Tentative Parcel 2~ $251.0o N/A Transfer from SECTION 9.4 Map Appeal Engineering Fee Already Addressed in Planning Fee Schedule Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 50 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION t t - RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION POLICE SECURITY SERVICES SECTION 11 Deputy Reserve $31 .oo Hourly $31.06 Hourly N/A Typographical Error Deputy II $57?o Hourly $51 ?7 Hourly N/A Typographical Error Sergeant $64?o Hourly $64.36 Hourly N/A Typographical Error t~AN C H 0 C U CAM 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A request to review and approve the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan through the adoption of the attached Resolution. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND: In August and September of 2001, the Foothill Boulevard and Economic Development Task Fome (Mayor Pro Tern Williams, Councilman Biane, Chairman McNiel, and Commissioner Stewart) reviewed and accepted the design concept for the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The Task Force directed staff to forward the design concept for Planning Commission and City Council approval. On October 24 and December 12, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Visual Improvement Plan. The Commission also recommended approval for the Development Code, Victoria, and Terre Vista Community Plans amendments, as they are related to the Visual Improvement Plan. Attached for City Council review is the staff report and minutes from the Planning Commission meeting held on December 12, 2001. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF/jc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 12, 2001 Exhibit "B" - Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-111 Proposed Council Resolution 22' THE CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA DATE: December 12, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A request to review and approve the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to forward a recommendation of approval for the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: On October 24, 2001, the design consultant presented to the Planning Commission the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The consensus of the Planning Commission was to support the approval of the plan. Attached for the Commission's reference is a copy of the October 24 staff report and minutes. At the meeting the Commission also directed staff to proceed with amending the Development Code and the Victoria and Terra Vista Community Plans in order to reference the Visual Improvement Plan. The Commission agreed with staff to forward the approval of the Visual Improvement Plan to the City Council along with the related Code Amendments. VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: The Plan shows a very urban design for the two gateways at Grove and East Avenues and the eight activity centers. Each intersection is uniquely designed to promote cohesiveness in all four corners. The plan did not include a specific design for the Activity Center at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road because the Foothill Boulevard Plan established a rural, informal, village concept for this Activity Center recognizing its historical uniqueness. Staff and the consultant agreed that imposing a specific design for the activity center might not be the best approach. This Activity Center should continue to be treated differently and specially. The specific design can be developed at the time of new or re- development of the site. The Plan also shows the parkway transition design and the use of Route 66 icon "embossed" on the asphalt pavement. The Plan includes a collection of approved street elements such as bus shelters, trash receptacles, benches, the color and design of poles, etc. and a palette of Route 66 icons. The intent of the Plan is to include enough details and specifications so that a designer can use it in preparing construction plans. The Plan also includes an Implementation Program that outlines the responsible party for the improvements, the timing for the installations or improvements of the vadous streetscape elements, and a listing of funding mechanisms for PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN December 12, 2001 Page 2 the improvements. At the preparation of this report, staff is working with the Redevelopment Agency, City Engineer, and City Manager's Office in finding the funding resources or grants from the State or Federal level to implement the Visual Improvement Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF~Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - October 24, 2001, Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes Exhibit "B" - Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval to City Council THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $ Repo DATE: October 24, 2001 TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM~ Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUEJECT.' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A review of the design concept for the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan, forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council, and direct staff to initiate appropriate amendments to the Development Code, Victoda Community Plan, and Terra Vista Community Plan. BACKGROUND: In June 2001, staff introduced to the Commission the draft design concept of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual improvement Plan. The design concept was well received by the Commission at the meeting. Attached is a copy of the staff report and minutes, see Exhibit "A." The design consultant has been refining the concept plan based on the comments from the Commission and the Foothill Boulevard and Economic Development Task Force (Council Members Williams and Biane; Commissioners Stewart and McNiel). In August .and September 2001. the Task Force reviewed the final design concept and directed staff to forward it for Planning Commission review and City Council approval. ANALYSIS: This section of the report will briefly describe the intent of the Visual Improvement Plan and its design concept. Representatives from the City's design consultant, Urban Design Studio/RBF, will be presenting a presentation of the design concept at the meeting. A. Implementation of Foothill District: A significant portion of the Foothill Boulevard Distdct in the Development Code is directed to the visual improvement of Foothill Boulevard/Route 66. Specifically, infrastructure upgrading involving special gateway design and color coordination involving hardware, street furniture, poles and related objects within the public right-of-way are strategies mentioned in the Implementation' Section of the Foothill Boulevard District. The Visual Improvement Plan will meet the intent of the mentioned strategies because the design concept will visually enhance the boulevard with street furniture and elements that unify the streetscape, promote cohesiveness, and preserve Histodc Route 66. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VIP October 24, 2001 Page 2 B. Visual Improvement Plan Concept: The Visual Improvement Plan shows the specific design for the two gateways at Grove and East Avenues and the eight activity centers. Each intersection is uniquely designed to promote cohesiveness in all four corners. It ~,lso shows the parkway transition design and the use of the Route 66 icon "embossed" on the asphalt pavement. The Visual Improvement Plan includes a collection of approved street elements such as a bus shelter, trash receptacles, benches, color and design of the poles, etc. and a palette of Route 66 icons. The intent of the Visual Improvement Plan is to include enough details and specifications so that a designer can use it in preparing construction plans C. The next step: As the Visual Improvement Plan is dose to completion, several planning documents, specifically the Development Code, Victoria Community Plan, and Term Vista Community Plan need to be amended to add language that references the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The purpose is for members of the development community and design professionals to be aware of the design concept and obtain the Visual Improvement Plan for the preparation of their development plans. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a. recommendation of approval of the Visual Improvement Plan to the City Coundl and direct staff to initiate Development Code, Victoria Community Plan, and Term Vista community Plan amendments to reference the Visual Improvement Plan in those documents. The recommendation of approval of the Visual Improvement Plan should be forwarded to the City council concurrently with the recommendation of approval for the amendments in the various Planning documents. . Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:mlg Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated June 27, 2001 DRAFT DECEMBER 2001 ..~,~/.-/' VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Im rovements Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Table of Contents Introduction I. Purpose II. Project Area Project Area Map III. The V.I.P. Design Concepts The Gateways Activity Centers Suburban Parkways Streetscape Furniture Palette Artwork/Icon Palettes Placement and Standards Bus Shelters Bridge Mural IV. Implementation Program Phasing Plan and Matrix Funding Mechanisms Resource Guide Banner Program Grant Writing Recommendations VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 Introduction Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamon§a is an invaluable piece of Americana known as Route 66. it has often been called the Mother Road or America's Main Street. Throughout the west, it was known for its unique car culture of the mid-century, its creative highway signage, motels, trading posts, tourist traps, and service stations. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been gifted with having its major commercial corridor being a part of this uniquely American icon. While many towns search for a theme or a sense of place, this City already has the great opportunity to capitalize and enhance its inherent theme. Not only do the recent improvements along Foothill Boulevard create a significant streetscape character, but there are still vestiges of the Historic Route 66 waiting to be celebrated. With this Visual Improvement Plan, we hope to enhance and commemorate the history of America's most famous highway as it travels through the City of Rancho Cucamonge. CITY O1~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE OF 23~) VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 I. Purpose. The purpose of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan is to develop e design specification plan that wi, set forth design concepts for the streetscepe improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry areas a~ong the entire length of Route 66 in Rancho Cucamonga. This plan will help guide e balanced and unified pattern of streetScape for both public and private development. By drawing upon the existing positive improvements and developing a set of unique and unifying historic elements, this plan will ensure that Foothill Boulevard will be an exciting reflection of Historic Route 66 as well as Historic Rancho Cucamonga. To accomplish this purpose, the plan provides specific design concepts for the westerly and easterly gateways end eight activity centers along the Foothi, Boulevard corridor, from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. It also provides concepts for the Suburban parkway enhancement areas at various locations, a unifying palette of streetscape furniture, unique Route 66 icons, artwork, and various other visual enhancement concepts that can be utilized in future developments and improvements along the Boulevard. II. Project Area Description. The project area consists of the entire length of Foothill Boulevard through the City, from Grove Avenue on the west to East Avenue on the east. The focus of the design concepts will be at the two entry gateway areas and the eight activity centers. The westerly gateway is the area from Grove Avenue to the railroad overpass. The eight activity centers are located in the areas of the major cross streets that intersect with Foothill Boulevard. They are Vineyard Avenue, Archibald Avenue, Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue. The easterly gateway is the intersection at East Avenue. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE OF ~37 Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 Gateways and Activity Centers Project Map Gateways ~ Activity Centers [] Parcels within 300 I'eet of Foothill Boulevard VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 III. Design Concepts. A. Entry Gateways The Entry Gateway should announce not only the entrance into the City but also acquaint the motorist with the fact that they are on Historic Route 66 and celebrate its heritage. The westerly gateway consists of an expansive area from Grove Avenue to the railroad overpass. This area should incorporate a two-part design concept. The first part of the gateway concept should focus on the City entry statement at Grove Avenue with a secondary portion of the entry statement occurring at the first widened median, allowing for special entry monument; possibly a street-spanning signage. The Grove Avenue intersection should incorporate large accent setbacks with a modified version of the City entry monument and a backdrop of large accent date palms. (See elevation and plan view) The corner areas should be paved with brick style concrete pavers matching the existing pavers in the Foothill Boulevard medians. The sidewalks extending approximately 100' - 120' away from the corner setback areas should be 10' minimum wide curb adjacent with accent integral colored concrete, with a double row of bdck bands (approximately 10' wide x 15' long grid pattern.) Crape Myrtle trees should be planted in an alternating pattern flanking both sides of the sidewalk at a spacing of 30' for each row. The trees should be in 4' x 4' tree wells with tree grates. The second portion of the western gateway should take place at the first widened median island. The focus of this area should be the street-spanning arch, which announces the entrance to Historic Route 66, Along the roadway edge, place a historical replica of the post and cable safety barrier. (See plan and sketch view for details and placement) Further to the east is the railroad overpass bridge, The facings of the bridge may be utilized as a placement for a large mural or relief panel of historic significance depicting Route 66 history or the eight states along its route. The east gateway is located at the intersection of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Currently East Avenue does not continue across Foothill Boulevard to the south. However, the gateway concept should be designed with the assumption that ultimately East Avenue will be continued, as development occurs. The comer areas should incorporate large accent comer setbacks, with a modified version of the City entry monument sign and a backdrop of large accent date palms. (see elevation and plan view) The comer areas should be paved with brick style concrete pavers matching the existing pavers in the Foothill Boulevard medians. The accent sidewalk areas should be 10' wide, curb adjacent, accent integral colored concrete, with a double row of brick bands (approximately 10' wide x 15' long gdd pattern). Crape Myrtle trees should be planted in an alternating pattern flanking both sides of the sidewalk at a spacing of 30' for each row. The trees should be in 4-foot by 4-foot tree wells with tree grates. This special accent sidewalk treatment should extend down approximately 100' to 120' in length from the corner setback areas. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONIGA PAGE OF VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 Streetlights, as shown on the streetscape fumiture palette should be placed at approximately 120' on center with the first one being placed approximately 120' from the lighted traffic signal at the corner. (These will ultimately replace existing cobra head lights.) Benches and trash receptacles, as shown on the streetscape furniture palette, should be placed in or near any bus shelter or bus stop location. If no bus stops are located on a block section, they should be spaced evenly down each block section, at 3 sets per block with one at or near each corner and one mid-block. City OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAG[ OF 2 L/,~) Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 GATEWAY ENTRY STATEMENT , Monument Sign West Entry at Grove Avenue (See Entry Monument Concept for Details) Date Palms Behind Monument at Approx. 20' on Center (by Approx. I05' Length) Curb Adjacent Sidewalk with Integral Accent Colored Concrete and Double Rows of Brick Banding Row of Crape Arch Announcing Myrtles in Tree Grates at Approx, Historic Route 66 15' on Center -- Historic Post and Cable Roadway Safety Barrier 120' Feet in Len§ht) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ~ to Match Median Existing Plantings Crosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Brick Sty Adhere to the Design Concepts from the Feothill Boulevard Specific PJan, Parkway Transition Zone, with a 75' Length of Flowed ng Plum Accent Trees and Meandering Sidewalks Adhere to the Design Concepts from the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Suburban Parkway Zone, with Drifts of Sycamores and Meandering Sidewalks Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 ENTRY MONUMENT CONCEPTS ,10~ 6~ FOOTHIIJ. IJLVD d~ 30' d~ CITY ENTRY MONUMENT - PLAN VIEW CITY ENTRY MONUMENT - ELEVATION Foothill Boulevard-Historic Route 66 GATEWAY ENTRY ARCH CONCEPT Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 GATEWAY ENTRY STATEMENT City Entry Monument Sign East Entry at East Avenue (See Entry Date Palms Behind Monument at Approx. 20' on Center -- 12' Wide (by Approx. 10S' Length) Curb Street Spanning Arch Announcing Adjacent Sidewalk with Integral Accent Historic Co[ored Concrete and Double Rows of Historic Post and Cable Brick Banding Roadway Safety Barrier Double Alternating Row of Crape (Approx. 120' R Myrtles in Tree Grates at Approx. 15' on Center -- to Match Existing Median Plantin FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Crosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete Pavers in the Median Brick Style Concrete Pavers on Corners Adhere to the Design Concepts from Adhere to the Design Concepts from ~ the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Z Suburban Farkway Zone, with Dlifts Parkway Transition Zone, with a 75' ~: of Sycamores and Meandering Sidewalks Length of Flowering Plum Accent Trees and Meandering Sidewalks ~ VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 B. Activity Centers. As stated in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the eight activity centers are typically located at major intersections. These activity centers should function to provide each district with a focal point emphasizing the Historic Route 66 character. Although each of the eight separate activity centers have many unique design concepts, as shown on each plan, they all have many design specifications in common which unity the entire project. Those unifying elements are as follows: Each activity center should have large corner setback areas, paved in brick style concrete pavers, matching the existing brick pavers in the Foothill Boulevard medians. Paved corner setback areas should extend, at a minimum, to 20' beyond the point of curb return. (approximately 40' from curb intersection) Larger areas of corner treatments are highly encouraged. Whenever possible, these corner setback areas should provide for direct access into the commercial centers adjacent to the activity center. An alternative to the pavers would be accent integral colored concrete with brick paver accent bands. To the extent possible, the corner access areas should be planted with groves of specimen date palms spaced at approximately 20' on center in tree grates. Each corner setback area should provide for the placement of special artwork or district identification. (See Artwork/Icon Palette for choices.) These should be placed so they are clearly visible to both pedestrians, and vehicular travelers on Foothill Boulevard. (See each Activity Center Plan View for locations) Provide Direct Access 40' As stated in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the formal streetscape design of sidewalks at the activity centers should extend along Foothill Boulevard and side/intersecting street frontages from the corner setback area to a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway. This typically should be at least to the first driveway, or at least 120' on Foothill Boulevard and 100' on the side/intersecting street. The sidewalks should be 10' wide CITY OF RANcHo CLIcAMONGA PAGE . OF' VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 (minimum) accent integral colored concrete with double rows of brick paver bands (approx 10' W x 15' L, grid pattern). The sidewalks should be curb adjacent at any corner that provides for a bus turnout/bus shelter location. Otherwise, thero should be a planted 4' wide (minimum) curb-adjacent parkway. Crepe Myrtle trees should be planted in an alternating pattern flanking both sides of the sidewalk at a spacing of 30' for each row. The trees should be in ~ x 4' tree wells with tree grates. ×5' T'~ 4 x 4 tree well with tree grate 10' 15' 15' l 30' Sidewalk Accent Areas A series of three Route 66 icons (see palette for choices) at approximately 30' on center should be placed either between the front row of Crape Myrtle Trees or within the landscaped parkway along the Foothill Boulevard frontages. (See each plan view for specific locations). CiTY OF i.,R. ANcHoCucAMONGA PAGE ,OF~"' 2/1//~ VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOLILEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 Grosswalks should bo approximately 8' wido, accont paving matorial, (matching tho color · ' 12' and pattom of the terra ootta toned pavers m tho mod ans) w th a wide ooncreto band on both eidos. 12" wide concrete band 8' wide staml~ed herringbone pattern material to ma~ch the terra cotta colored brick used in the median The interior of the intersection should be an accent paving material, gray toned color to match the gray bricks used in the medians. See each individual activity center concept plan for details and specific variations. Placement and spacing of streetscape furniture and artwork will be discussed under Section D, Streetscape Furniture and Artwork/Icon Palette. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE OF. .~ q7 Foothill Boulevard- Historic Route 66 PROPOSED BUILDING VINEYARD AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER Approved Site Plan SITE ~ Streetscape Unifying Elements Improvements ,,Z, EXISTING ELEMENTS: ~ EXISTING THOMAS WINERY · River Rock Wafis and Planters HISTORIC / LANDMARK eBrick Style Pavers on Corners ~;~ BUILDING AND PARKING AREA .Brick Style Paver Banding in Sidewalks ~ · Double (Ahernating) Rows of Crape Myrtle · Tree Grates ~Z e 66 Icons in this .GrapeArbors /. ;a. Location (Typical all 4 Corners, See Palette of Alternatives) ,L ELEMENTSTO HELP UNIFY: ~§ Material ~g Concrete Pavers Foothill Bird 24" Wide Concrete Ban( mg .Specia~, at Four Corners Placement of Special Artwork or .Historic Pedestrian Level Light Poles District Identificalion (Typ. all 4 · Paint All Traffic Control Hardware and Street:scape Furniture Consistent Color corners, See Palette of Alternatives) -- --' Crosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Material · All North and 5outh bound intersecting sir.ets Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete should have Route 66 and district identiBcation FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Pavers in the Medians i?corporated on to the Foothill Blvd. streelname FOOTHILL BOULEVARD .Interior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored Accent paving Material Matching the Herring Bone Paitern of the Concrete Pavers in the Median Approved Site Plan Identification (Typ. all 4 corners, See Improvements Palette of Alternatives) ~ See Palette for Choices of Icons, Streel Furniture, ~ and Traffic Lanes Shall Be · ,, Per City's ( r , C/~Culation Element :D g Streetscape Z Pattern with BrickPaver ~ Bands, Rock Walls and in Tree Grates Double Row of Crape Myrtles Bus Turnout and Shelter with ' Opportunity for Placement of Historic Artwork or Mural Included in the Design ~e Pattern with Brick Paver Bands, Rock Wa~ls, Double Row of Crape Myrtles in Tr~e Grates and Brick Paved Corners --Incorporate Service Station Foot~ill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 this Location ARCHIBALD AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER - INTERIM DESIGN -Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material -- Utilize Existing "Archibald Street Banner" Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 for Rome 66 Seasonal Events and Include a Permanent Route 66 Logo -- PROPOSED BU~tD~nG ARCHIBALD AVENUE ACTIVITY m ::,, CENTER-ULTIMATE DESIGN CONCEPT ' '": ~ EXISTING ELEMENTS ON NORTHEAST ~ CORNER ONLY: .Parkway and Setback Planting ~ PROPOSED CONCEPTS FOR ,' REDEVELOPMENT OF 3 CORNERS: · , eAU Buildings Oriented to, or near, Bus Turnout with Sheltel -- · Pave Corners with Brick SIyle Pavers 'pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material Double Brick Band Accent (Typ.) -- Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete Double Alternating Row of Cra Pavers in the Medians Utilize Brick Siyle Pavers on all Four Corners -- Paved in Accent Paving Material "Route 66 Icons within Sidewalk or Matching the Color o[ the Existing Concrete Landscape R.O.W. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Pavers in the Medians especial Artwork or District Identification 24" Wide Concrete Banding at all 4 Corners Accent Colored Concrete Sidewalk with Double Row -Historic Pedestrian Level Light Poles of Brick Banding · Paint all Traffic Control Hardware and ......... Stree scape Furni ur. a Cons sen Co or ....... eA NO th and Sou h Bound n ers,ct n~ Streets Should Have Route 66 Icons and District Identification Incorporated into the Foothill Blvd. Street name Sign --:elnterior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored Material M~ching the HerrinI Bone Pattern of the Concrete Pavers in the aa Median LOCATiOn ~ .',' .":.')~:.... ~< See Paletle for Choices of Icons, Special LOCATION WITH ~ Ultimate Righl-of-Way and Traffic Lanes PROPOSEDBuiLDiNG ~ CORNERACCESS -- Shall Be Per Cily's General Plan Circulalion LOCATION ~: Element : Banding and Double Alternating Row of Crape Myrtles in Tree Grates Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 HERMOSA AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER Streetscape Unifying Elements EXISTING ELEMENTS: II REiXi:iS~iN~Gf: ~EXISTING · Large Parkways with Turf and Meandering Sidewalk ~ .Low Rock Wall / Planters in the Corner Setback EXISTtNG PARKING ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS TO HELP UNIFY: · Large Parkways with Turf and Meandering Sidewalk Fave Corners with Brick Style Pavers .Low Rock Wall / Planters in the Corner Setback · pave Corners with Brick-Style Pavers · Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete · . Pavers in the Medians · Route 66 Icons within Landscape / Sidewalk R.O.W. Duplicate the Streetscape Pattern from ·Special Artwork or District Identification at ~he S.E. Corner (On the Other 3 Corners), all 4 corners with Meandering Sidewalk, Icon Placement, .Hisloric Pedestrian Level Light Poles Low Rock Wall, Hanters, Etc. Crosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete · Paint all Traffic Conlrol Hardware and Pavers in the Medians Streetscape Furniture a Consistent Color Add t FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ·All North and South bound intersecting streets should have Route 66 and district identification incorporated on to the Foothill Blvd. streetname Utilize Existing Parkway for Placement signs of Three Route 66 Icons (See Palette ·Interior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored of Alternatives) 24" Wide Concrete Banding Accent paving Material Matching the Herring Bone Pattern of the Concrete Pavers in the Median ~ See Palette for Choices of Icons, Special Artwork for Placement of Special ~ ~ -- ExistingSidewalk Features, Street Furniture and Accent Paving Opportunity Artwork or District Identificafion Z:ua ~ Existing Landscaped Area ~ Ultimate Right of-Way and Traffic Lanes Shall Be on all 4 Corners ~ -- Low Rock Wall Per City's General Plan Circulation Element ~ Plan~er Area O ~ EXISTING BUILDING Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 HAVEN AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER EXISTING '~' Streelscape Unifying Elements VIRGINIA DARE WINERY BUILDING EXISTING ELEMENTS: · Large Setbacks with Double Rows of Palm Trees EXISTING TERRA VISTA .Corner Access wilh Accent / Art Features ~ TOWN CENTER .... ' ~ -~ -Grape Arbors ~ ,Thematic Bol~ards Existing Low Wall / Signage \ : 66 Icons Between Front Row ADDITIONAL ELEMENTSTO HELP UNIFY: of Palms (all 4 Corners) · Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete Pavers in the Medians , '~ 'Add Route 66 Icons in Parkways · Add Special / Unique Artwork at Four Corners · Historic Pedestrian Level Light Poles -Accent, Scored Integral Colored .Consistent Color on Hardware and Furniture Create "Visual Access" Into Site by Concrete on all 4 Corners .All North and South bound intersecting streets should have Route 66 and district identification Increasing the Comer Paved Area Crosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Malerial incorporated on to the Foothill Blvd. streetname Up to the Existing Signage Wall. Add Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete signs a Unique, Route 66 Afl-,york or District Pavers in the Medians .Interior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored Identification in Setback Area Accent paving Material Matching the Herring 24" Wide Concrete Banding Bone PaUern of the Concrete Pavers in the FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ,dd Special / Unique Artwork or District ID Median Thematic Bollards on all Corne~s. Cfyp. all 4 Corners) ~ See Palette for Choices of Icons, Special Artwork i Features, Street Furniture and Accent Paving ~: Ultimate Right-of-Way andTraffic Lanes Shall Be Per City's General Plan Circulation Element ~ ~ Use Palms I'or all Four Corners; Ulilize Phoenix daclilifera (Date Palm); Minimum 20' BTH(brown trunk heighl) ~ Ig Low Wall / Signage Z APPROVED EXISTING SITE PLAN BARTON PLAZA Foothill Historic Route 66 North Corners Landscape Se~ack Areas to MILLIKEN AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER Match Approved St~eetscape Unifying Elements Plan Concepts on South Comers ELEMENTSTO HELP UNIFY: · Double (Alternating) Row of Crape Myrtle inTree Grates in Sidewalk ~ ,Accent Rows of Date Palms behind Sidewalk · Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete Pavers in the Medians th Brick Banding on the Sidewalks and Corners aatmenl in the Intersection to Match All Activib/Center Bus Turnout Intersections and Shelter Add 3 Route 66 Icons on All ,Low Wall / Planter at Each Corner Setback Rows of Accent Date P Four Comers (See Palette ,Placement of Artwork or District Identification Accent Planter Pots of Ahernatives) in the Wall / Planters ,,Three Route 66 Icons within Parkway or Sidewa}k ~aved in Accent Paving Material R.O.W. on Foothill Blvd. Frontage (all 4 Corners) Accent Concrete with Brick Bandit Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete ,All North and South bound intersecting streets FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Pavers in the Medians should have Route 66 and district identification Low Wall / Planter at Each Corner with Artwork incorporated on to Ihe Foothill Blvd. streetnanle or District Identification Icon Placed within signs Planter on all Four Corner 24" Wide Concrete Baeding .Interior of lntersection Paved in Dark Colored Accent paving Material Matching the Herring Double Row of Crepe Bone Pattern of the Concrete Pavers in the - Bus Turnout Median and Shelter See Palette for Choices of icons, Special Artwork Street Furniture and Accent Paving , and Traffic Lanes Shall Be Z APPROVED SITE PLAN ..Z. APPROVED SITE PLAN Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 ROCHESTER AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER OLD SPAGHETTI Streetscape Unifying Elements EXISTING ELEMENTS: · Double Row (Alternating) of Crape Myrtle in Planted Tree Wells Duplicate Str~etscape Pattern (from * 10'-12' W~de Concrete Sidewalks with Brick Banding NW Corner) with Double Row Accent of Crape Myrtles in Planted Tree Wells ·4' WJdeTud Parkways Between Curb and Sidewalk and Corner Access ADDITIONAL ELEMENTSTO HELP UNIFY: · Repeat Sidewalk and Tree Patterns on the East Sides and Bring Sidewalk Out to Curb Adjacency · Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Materia~ Add 3 Route 66 Icons -- Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete Add 3 Route 66 Icons in Pavers in the Medians Placement of Special Artwork or Turf Parkways on Three Corners · Route 66 Icons within the Planted Turf Parkways aed on District Identification at all 4 Corners.-- Either Side of Bus Shelter on Foothill B~vd alks Paved in Accent Paving Material *Special Accent Pavement in the letersection to Match Matching the Co,or of the Existing Concrete all Aclivity Center Intersections FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Pavers in the Medians *Placement of Artwork or District Idenlif~ea~ion in a[~ 4 Corners · Historic Pedestrian Level Light Poles Add 3 Route 66 Icons to Parkway *All North and South bound intersecting streets Localions on all 4 Sides should have Route 66 and district identification incorporated on to the FoothilJ Blvd. streetname 24" W~de Concrete Banding signs Bollards on Each Corner *Interior of ~ntersection Fared in Dark Colored Accent paving Material Matching the Herring Bone Paitern of Ihe Concrete Pavers in the Median - ~ See Palette for Choices of Icons, Special Artwork ua ~ Ultimate Right-of-Way and Traffic Lanes Shall Be ~' Per City's General Plan Circulation Element O El Carnino Real Bell and Relocate to the Corner for More Exposure ~'~ ~ APPROVED SITE PLAN CONCEPT for all 4 Corners 6'-10' Wide Foothill Boulevard- Historic Route 66 Accent Colored / Scored Concrete Sidewalk with Double Row of Brick Bands-- ~ DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ACTIVITY CENTER Strc~etscape Unifying Elements Grove of Crepe Myrtles and Date Pal O ELEMENTSTO HELP UNIFY: m .Accent Colored / Scored Concrete Sidewalk with Pedestrian, u~ Double row of Brick Bands · Brick Siyle Paver Banding · Three Route 66 Icons along Sidewalks on Foothill Blvd Frontage (See Palette of ABernatives) t/ .Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material Matching the Color o1' the Existing Concrete and Shelter .Special Accent Treatment to Inters,etlon to Match ~aved in Accent Paving Material all Eight Activity Cen(er InlersecBons Placement of Special Arb, york or Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete -Historic Pedestrian Level Light Poles Districl Identification on all 4 Corner Pavers in the Medians .Paint All Traffic Control Hardware and Street · All North and South bound intersecting streeLs should have Route 66 and district identification 24" Wide Concrete Banding incorporated on to the Foothill Blvd. streetname FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FOOTHILL BOULEVARD signs · interior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored Add Three Route 66 Icons . of Special Artwork or Accent paving Material Matching the Herring on all 4 Corners (See Palette District Identification on all 4 Corners Bone Pattern of the Concrete Pavers in the of Altern Median ~< See Paleite for Choices of Icons, Special Artwork ~Ultimate Right-of-Way and Traffic Lanes Shall Be Per City's General Plan Circulation Element O APPROVED SITE PLAN CONCEPT Double(Ahernadng) Row of Crape FOothillBoulevard - Historic Route 66 My~lles in Planted Tree Wells (1st Row Curb Adjacent). ETIWANDA AVENUE ACTIVITY CENTER i APPROVED Streetscape Unifying Elements SITE PtAN P~ace Speciat Artwork or District VAC~r IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ELEMENTS: identification on all 4 Corners .Double Brick Paver Bands in Sidewalk · Double (Alternating) Rows of Crape Myrtles in Planted Tree Wells 3 Route 66 Icons Placed Between Front ~ ·Brick Style Pavers on Corners Row of Street Trees o~ Foothill Blvd. (See Palette of,* ~ ADDITIONAL ELEMENTSTO HELP UNIFY: · Repeat Above PaUems on Remaining Corners · Pave Crosswalks with Accent Paving Material Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete Pavers in the Medians Duplicate the Streetscape Paltem .,Add 3 Route 66 Icons Between Front Row of Trees (from SW Corner) with Double Brick .Place Special Artwork or District Identification on all 4 Corners Paver Bands, Double (Alternating) Row :rosswalks Paved in Accent Paving Material eHistoric Pedestrian Level Light Foles of Crape Myrtles in Planted Tree Wells Matching the Color of the Existing Concrete * Paint All Traffic ControJ Hardware and Streetscape Pavers in the Medians Furniture a Consistent Color · All North and South bound intersecting streets should have Route 65 and district identification FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FOOTHILL BOULEVARD incoq)orated on to the Foothill Blvd. streetname e lnterior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored 24" Wide Concrete Banding Accent paving Material Matching the Herring Bone Pattern of the Concrete Pavers in the Existing Brick Sb/le Pavers ~ District identification Median on all 4 Corners .interior of Intersection Paved in Dark Colored Accent paving Material Matching the Herring Bone Pattern of the Concrete Pavers in the Median i ~ See Palette for Choices of Icons, Special Artwork Features, Street Furnilure and Accent Paving EXISTING BUILDING . ~ VACA~n ~ Ultimate Right-of-Way and Traffic Lanes Shall Be Per City's General Plan Circulation Element Existing Stmelscape Pattern with Double Z Brick Paver Bands and Double (Alternating) Row of Crape Myrtles in Planted Tree Wells- VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 C. Suburban Parkways The typical suburban parkway design for Foothill Boulevard should follow the guidelines set forth in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms, meandering sidewalks, and informal drifts of London Planes, California Sycamores, and Purple Plum trees. (See the Typical Suburban Parkway Plan View and Elevation) Located at various locations within the suburban parkways ara many opportunities for enhancement areas that provide additional focal points to celebrate the Route 66 theme. The approximate locations for these proposed enhancement areas are shown on the location map, and should occur as part of any new development of vacant parcels, or redevelopment within the locations takes place. The enhanced features of these areas include replacing a 45' section of the typical parkway planting/sidewalk area as well as the roadway pavement and median, with special treatments of pavement materials artwork/icon placement and accent tree plantings. All are shown in detail on the Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area Prototype Plan View and Elevation on the following pages. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE ' OF .~'~ 7 Foothill Boulevard. Historic Route 66 Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area Location Map Approximate Locations for Suburban Parkway Enhancement Areas J~:,~,oos. Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 Informal Clusters of Trees, RollingTud TYPICAL SUBURBAN PARKWAY Berms and Meandering Plan View and Elevation Parkway Setback Widths Vary , (16~ Minimum) Lights at Approx 140' O.C. BLVD : * See City Standards for Required Widths · 'Refer to Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Suburban Parkway and Median Standards Additional Accent Lighting (optional) at Approx 120' on Center where Feasible Parkway Setback Widths Vary (16' Minimum) PLAN VIEW Double Globe Median Street Light for Additional Accent Lighting (optional) at Approx 120' on Center whe~ Informal Clusters of Trees, RollingTuff ;, Rolling Turf Berms and Meanderin Berms and Meandering Sidewalk ** Single Globe Acorn Style Street e Globe Acorn Style Street Lights (Banners optional) Lights (Banners optional) Rhus lancea with Low Grouted Cover and Shrubs'* 6' Wide ¢arkway Setback [xisting lravel Lanes Median 14' [xistinglravel Lanes Parkway Setback 16' Minimum FU:VAIION 16' Minimum Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 Existing Landscaped Parkway ~ NOTES: Setback with Sidewalk, Trees ~~ · Replace a 45' stretch of Ihe exisling parkway a nd Turf (Min. 16') planting / sidewalk with a section of enhanced features. Special Accent Paving Material to m Historic: Post and Cable icon features iQ the middle. Roadway Safety Barrier Placement of Special Artwork / icon Bench- Utilize Brick Pattern Style Concrete Pavers in Median to Match Existing Pavers Expanded Sidewalk Areas Could Be Utilized for Placement of Mosaic Murals or Slate Decal Accent Colored C Existing Median g Landscaped Parkway Setback with Sidewalk, Trees Existin§ and Turf (Min. 16') Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 SUBURBAN PARKWAY ENHANCEMENT AR~r~6. PROTOTYPE Spaced at 15' on Center /-~ Placement of Special Crape Myrtles in Tree Wells Artwork / Icon t Colored Concrete Accent Colored Artwork / Icon Placement of Special Artwork / Icon nd Cable Historic Post and Cable Roadway Safety Barrier Roadway Safety Barrier FOOTHILL BOULEVARD [' ' ' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ~r 16'Minimum ~r Exisling Travel Lanes ~lf ExisJin§ Median. ExJstJn§ Travel Lanes f 16'Minimum f NORTH VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 D. Streetscape Furniture and Artwork/Icon Palettes One of the most important elements that cohesively ties an entire streetscape together is a uniform palette of furniture. The Streetscape Furniture Palette, as shown on the 11 x 17 color foldout, consists of thematic streetlights, benches, trash receptacles, pedestrian safety bollards, accent paving materials, newspaper racks, special accent c{ocks for focal points, and banners to be attached to the streetlight poles. All metal or painted surfaces of the streetscape furniture should be dark green (or matching the Pantone PMS color 343). The following is a listing of the elements shown on the Streetscape Furniture Palette, with a suggested manufacturer and standards for placement. $inqle Acorn Traditional Streetliqht K118 Washington Luminaire on 15' KM-15 Memphis pole by King Luminaire (800) 268-7809 The single globe acorn style lights should be placed in the parkway/sidewalk locations at a spacing of approximately 120' on center and approximately 2' from the curb. (Eventually replacing the existing cobra head style lighting where it exists.) Double Teardrop-Style Streetliqht K205 Marquis luminaire on KA30-2 Scroll Arm, on a KCH-22 Classic style 22' pole by King Luminaire (800) 268-7809. The double teardrop style streetlights should be placed in medians, where feasible, at a spacing of approximately 120' on center, down the center of the median. Benches RB-28 6' Ribbon Series bench By Victor Stanley (800) 368-2573 Each of the benches (paired with a matching trash receptacle) should be placed at 3 sets per block. One set should be located at or near each corner (or bus shelter location) and one set placed mid-block or within any Parkway Enhancement area location. Trash Receptacles SD-42 36 gallon Bethesda Series trash receptacle with side-opening doore By Victor Stanley (800) 368-2573 Each of the trash receptacles (paired with benches) should be placed at 3 sets per block. One set should be located at or near each corner (or bus shelter location) and one set placed mid-block, or within any Parkway Enhancement area location. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE OF, VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC R.OUTE 66 Bollards Alternative 1: Cast iron or aluminum bollard 1890 Bollard By Canterbury International (800) 935-7111 Alternative 2: Concrete lighted bollard CB12 R 38 Cutoff dome MSB By Architectural Area Lighting (714) 994-2700 The 1890 bollards currently exist on the northeast corner of Haven and Foothill Boulevard. It is recommended that these be installed/implemented into the remaining 3 corners at this intersection. It is encouraged that bollards be installed at the busiest/largest of the eight Activity Center intersection corners. All four corners of any intersection should have the same style bollard for consistency. However, styles (Alternative 1 or 2) may change from intersection to intersection, depending on the character of the adjacent development. Accent Pavinq Material The paving material used within the corner setback areas should match the existing improved corners with a herringbone pattern of concrete brick pavers. These brick-shaped pavers are called Holland Stone, tri-color mix of Sunburst B-2, Red Brown Charcoal, and are provided by OIsen Pavingstone Inc. (949) 728-0415. The paving material to be used in the crosswalks and intersection areas should be StreetPrint asphalt pavement. StreetPrint is a textured asphalt material that replicates the appearance of pavers. The pattern recommended is a herringbone to match the existing brick pavers. The color of the crosswalks should be terra cotta, and the intersections, sierra colors. It is intended that these colors match, as closely as possible, the colors used in the existing concrete brick pavers in medians and corners. StraetPrint Pavement Technology is provided by the Mark Company (714) 685-3462. Newspaper Racks Multi-unit concrete newspaper racks by Quick Crete Products (909) 737-6240. Newspaper racks on Foothill Boulevard should be grouped together in one unit, located at major pedestrian access points of the Activity Centers. The exact locations to be determined by the City. The material color should be a light terra cotta finish. Clocks Danbury Style, 12' overall height By Canterbury International (800) 935-7111 Clocks are an optional item and may be used as the focal point or artwork/icon substitute in any Activity Center corner area. Banners Custom design 30" x 60" synthetic fabric banners by KBW (Kalamazoo BannerWorks) Sierra Display, Inc. (800) 388-5755 See Banner Program, iV-C, for details. c c^ o o^ P^oE.,oF 243 B~cho Cucamoflga / Footh~9! Bouleuard Main St ;' Raneho CUeamonga :, · ·/ icon I llrlamrk Palette / , ~, Rancho Cucamongn · ,. : leon lllftweB'k Palette VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC I~OUTE 66 Artwork and Icon Placement Standards The purpose of the Artwork and Icon program is to provide for opportunity to incorporate artistic representations of Historic Route 66, within the eight Activity Centers and various locations within the Suburban Parkways of Foothill Boulevard. Examples are shown on the Icon/Artwork Palettes, and may include sculptures, mosaics, murals, and other historic depictions of physical features on Route 66. This palette is intended as a guideline onlyto encourage future development of artist designs in the Route 66 theme. The Icon/Artwork shall be placed, as shown on the Activity Center Plan Views, and as shown on the Suburban Parkway Enhancement area Plan Views, oriented equally toward motorists and pedestrians. Within the Activity Centers, the primary artwork depictions shall be placed within the corner setback areas of each of the Activity Centers, as a focal point for that corner, 15 feet minimum from curb, to no more than 45 feet from curb at corner. The secondary artwork/icon depictions shall be a series of similar pieces, 3 in a row, at approximately 15 feet on center, within the parkway setback accent areas, along Foothill Boulevard, 3 feet to 6 feet from curb edge. Artwork/Icon depictions within the Suburban Parkway areas shall be approximately 3 feet to 6 feet from curb edge in parkways, and centered in medians of 14 foot width or more only. Activity Center Corner Corner Accent Sidewalk Accent Area Foothill Boulevard CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE OF 2~--~7 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 ArtworkJIcons Dimensions of the Artwork/icons should be variable, but stay within the streetscape pattern provided by the existing parkway trees. 6' x 6' wide at the base (maximum) 30' maximum height 12' x 12' wide at the top (maximum) These standard dimensions are recommended and may vary upon review and approval by the City. E 6~ VISUAL IMPROVEMENT [::'LAN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-HISTORIC ROUTE 66 Temporary Screen Fencing of Private Developments Temporary Fencing shall be provided to screen construction sites during site preparation and development on all projects with Foothill Boulevard street frontage. Fencing shall be solid painted murals for infill projects with frontage of __ feet or less. See Screen Fencing Mural depiction on Artwork Palette for concept. For projects with more than feet of street frontage, chain link fencing with decorative vinyl opaque fabric sheeting attached may be allowed. Screen fences shall be setback from curb a minimum of 16 feet and shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height. See City Standard drawings for fence and chain link construction details. ~' height minimum Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 BUS SHELTER CONCEPTS Both Alternative Concepts are Mission Style/Historic Service Station Motifs and Blend with the Existing Rancho Cucamonga Bus Shelters FRONT ALTERNATIVE 1 BUS SHELTER SIDE FRONT SIDE ALTERNATIVE 2 BUS SHELTER Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 RAILROAD OVERPASS MURAL CONCEPT This is a Concept only to Illustrate the Opportunity eandering Ribbon Representing Route 66, to Utilize the Future Railroad Overpass as a Mural Re Main Street of America Depicting the Historic Length of Route 66 Across (3 Dimensional Relief with Backllghtin§) America Each of the 8 States it Passes Through Set Behind the Meandering Ribbon and Attached to the Facing of the Bridge acing of Bridge Should be Rough Cut or Toweled Verticle Striations to Give Texture to the Background FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LOOKING EAST PROPOSED FUTURE RAILROAD OVERPASS Foothill Boulevard - Historic Route 66 Street Name Sign and Traffic Signal Hardware Implementation Program Introduction This chapter provides recommendations for the phasing, implementation, suggested leaders to carry out the implementation, and possible funding mechanisms that will effectively implement the Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. It contains four parts; 1. Phasing Plan & Matrix, 2. Funding Mechanisms Resource Guide, 3. Banner Program, and 4. Grant Writing Recommendations. The Grant Writing section provides recommendations and tips on effective and successful grant writing. This section is included to assist those interested in pursuing outside grants and technical assistance. Local organizations and groups are encouraged to apply for grants to implement the plan. 1. Phasing Plan & Matrix This section provides a brief description of the three phases of the Implementation Program with general descriptions of the logical breakdown of all the design elements, followed by a matrix which will provide a quick reference for the Implementation/Phasing Timeline. The Matrix is organized by a paraphrased description of all the design elements included in the plan, and the suggested leadem to carry out the implementation, as well as a Key Resources column. The Key Resources column is a checklist of the possible funding sources as referenced in the Funding Mechanism Resource Guide, which follows the matrix (Part 2) A, Phase 1 Within 1-2 years, or while Foothill Boulevard is still under CalTransjurisdiction, the following improvements should be given first priority: Gateway Entry Areas: · Corner accent paving, monument signs, and accent palm tree plantings. · Sidewalk accent treatment, with enhanced concrete paving, brick banding, and Crape Myrtle trees Activity Centers: ~ · Corner accent paving (if not existing) · Comer focal artwork/icon installations · Sidewalk accent treatments, with enhanced concrete paving, brick banding, and Crape Myrtle trees. (if not existing) · Sidewalk area artwork icon installations Street Furniture: · Benches · Trash receptacle · Bollards · Newspaper racks Banner Program on existing cobra head light poles Suburban Parkway Enhancement Areas: · Sidewalk accent treatments with enhanced concrete paving, brick banding, Crape Myrtle trees, artwork and mosaic tiles .27¢ B. Phase 2 Within 2-5 years, or soon after relinquishment of Foothill Boulevard from CalTrans to City jurisdiction, priority should be given to the implementation of the following aspects of the plan: Gateway Entry Areas: · Crosswalk accent paving · Intersection accent paving Activity Centers: · Crosswalk accent paving · Intersection accent paving Suburban Parkway Enhancement Areas: · Street section accent paving including Route 66 logo in pavement · Median section accent paving · Median artwork installation · Post-and-cable barriers on the sidewalks and in the medians · Additional benches and trash receptacles Replace cobra head lights with single globe historic style street lights Replace/retrofit thematic traffic signal poles and thematic street name signage. (may be done on an as-needed basis) Additional thematic bus shelters C. Phase 3 After 5 years every effort should be taken to ensure the implementation of the longer range, ultimate design elements, through public/private partnerships, fund-raising events, art in public places programs, as well as City programs. These features are, but not limited to, the following: · Street-spanning entry arch with post-and-cable roadway barriers · Railroad bridge overpass mural · Wayfinding signage and identity program · Additional or improved public art D.Matrix See 11 x 17 sheet Route 66 Visual Improvement Program Implementation Phasing Timeline Phase Potential KEY RESOURCES Leaders and Team Members Costs (Reference to Funding I 2 3 (See Key at bottom of Table) I Mechanisms Resource Guide) Elements of Design Concept (See (Paraphrased) Year 1-2 Year $+ detailed Year 2-5 Cost Under Under City Ultimate City RDA CC PP CT eT Analysis CalTrans Design Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Concepts after Furniture Gateway Entry Areas L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6, L7, L9, LI0 Corner Improvements X X 0 g 0 S2, S8, S9, S12, FS, Fll, F12, F17, Sidewalk Improvements N4, NS, NI 1, PI, P16 Ac~tivity Centers / · / '~ , /, Corner Improvements LI, L2, L3, L4, LS, L6, LT, LB, L9, Sidewalk Improvements / X X 0 0 L10, S2, S8, SS, S12, F5, F11, F12, Street Furniture F15, F17, N4, N9, N11, Suburban Parkway Enhancement Areas /7//// ~///~// ~rr/~ L1. L2. L3. L4. L5. L6. L7, L8. LO. Sidewalk Improvements X X 0 0 L10. S2. S3, S8, S9, S12. Fll. F12. Gateways and Ac~ivi ty Center Crosswalk Paving X X 0 LI. L2. L3, L4, L5, L6, L7. LB. L9. Intersection Paving L10. S3. F5, F12, F17. NS. P16 Suburban Pa rkway Enhancement Areas Street and Median Accent Paving Additional Street Furniture L10. F12, F17, NS. P16 wayfindin~ and Identity PrO~lrarn / /' ~ity Cucamon a Redevelopment Agency of Chamber of Private Property CalTrans Others include: -~ C~*r~r De~a~tment~ Clubs, Historic ,rese~ation Furniture Palette Estimate Costs Single Acorn Traditional Streetliqht K118 Washington luminaire on 15' KM-15 Memphis pole By King Luminaire (800) 268-7809 $1300.00 approximately Double Teardrop Style Streetli,qht K205 Marquis luminaire on KA30-2 Scroll arm, on a KCH-22 Classic style 22' pole By King Luminaire (800) 268-7809 $3600.00 approximately Benches nB-28 6' Ribbon Series Bench By Victor Stanley (800) 368-2573 $750.00 approximately Trash Receptacle SD-42 36 gallon Bethesda Series With Side-Opening Door By Victor Stanley (800) 368-2573 $720.00 approximately Boliards Alternative 1: 1890 Style cast iron or aluminum bollard By Canterbury International (800) 935-7111 $600.00 approximately Alternative 2: Concrete lighted bollard CB12 R 38 cutoff dome MSB By Architectural Area Lighting (714) 994-2700 $900.00 approximately Accent Pavin,q Material StreetPrint Asphalt Pavement Texturing By Mark Company (714) 685-3462 $6.50 s.f. (This is a rough estimate. The product, at 2.75 s.f., is coated on top of hot asphalt mix.) Newspaper Racks Multi-unit concrete rack By QuickCrete Products (909) 737-6240 (No price at this time) Clocks Danbury Style 12' height By Canterbury International (800) 935-7111 $13,900.00 approximately Banners Custom design 30" x 60" synthetic banners By Kalamazoo Banner Works/Sierra Display (800) 388-5755 $90.00 each approximately 2 '7'~ 2. Funding Mechanisms Resource Guide The following provides an overview of resources for the City of Rancho Cocamonga to put together a funding strategy for implementation. It looks at the various funding and technical assistance mechanisms available. This section does not impose a rigid approach to how the community shall fund the improvements along Foothill Boulevard. Rather, by describing the alternative sources and their potential for generating dollars, the City and other appropriate entities will be able to take the next step in the process, which is to enact the various sources. Partnerships with local organizations or agencies may be required or helpful. Additionally, the most successful approach to project funding will view project ideas and their positive impacts on Rancho Cucamonga in a broad sense and in a creative manner to access a variety of resources. This funding list is not intended to be exhaustive nor does not it attempt to work out the many details of final funding. This listing is organized into five categories of resources: (L) Local, (S) State, (F) Federal, (N) Non-Profit, and (P) Private. This listing is not intended to exclude any other available funding source nor does it require the use of any source listed. These resources are referenced, as labeled on the left, in the Key Resources column of the matrix. LOCAL RESOURCES L1 General Taxes DESCRIPTION. These taxes include excise taxes, utility user taxes, and property tax. Each of these taxes could be raised to generate revenue for Foothill Boulevard. However, the political realities in California Requires a 2/3-voter approval for property tax increases or a special tax. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENT~. Contact soume. SOURCE: City / Taxpayers L2 Transient Occupancy Tax DESCRIPTION. Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) are frequently used for projects that service and bolster the tourism industry. An increase of the City's TOT by 1% could generate sufficient additional funds to help support (Jown!own revitalization. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS. Refer to California Revised Statutes SOURCE: Hotel and Lodging facilities. L3 Assessment-backed Debt DESCRIPTION. Debt undertaken for public improvements wherein payback is tied to LIDs or BIAs. AMOUNT'. Variable REOUIREMENT~. Contact source. SOURCE: City coordinates assessment of property owners and/or businesses. L4 Business Improvement Areas (BIA) DESCRIPTION. Self-taxing business districts. Business and property owners pay for capital improvements, maintenance, marketing, parking, and other items as jointly agreed to through systematic, periodic self- assessment. BIAs include Business Improvement Districts (BIDs), Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) and other such financial districts. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS: BIAs can be controversial since taxation is involved. Considerable communication and consensus building should be conducted prior to launching a BIA creation program. SOURCE: Individual businesses, coordinated through City government. L5 City General Fund DESCRIPTION. It is not uncommon for cities that are seeking to revitalize their downtown to commit a certain amount of the General Fund to the effort over a period of years. General revenue funding is recommended for those improvements or ongoing projects, which have general community- wide benefits. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS'. Contact source. SOURCE: City or County. These funds could come from a Special Projects Fund or through the normal Capital Improvements budgeting process. L6 Development Fees DESCRIPTION. A system of fees on private development to address infrastructure impacts. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS. A difficulty of establishing equitable fees: those which are fair and do not eliminate the viability of desirable new projects. SOURCE: Developers. L7 Development Incentive Programs DESCRIPTION. Incentives encourage the private sector to provide the desired public improvements (incentives may include waived or reduced fees; increased density allowances, etc.). AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS: Contact soume. SOURCE: City. L8 Tax Increment Financing DESCRIPTION. Also known as revenue allocation financing. Most tax revenues from any increase in property values within the urban renewal area are dedicated to servicing the bonds. AMOUNT'. Funding dependent upon increased property values within revenue allocation area. REQUIREMENTS'. Facilities must be located within designated revenue allocation area boundaries and only within incorporated cities. Requires vote of city. council to establish urban renewal area and dedicate any increased revenues to project. SOURCE: City ordinance. L9 General Obligation Bonds DESCRIPTION. Tax-supported bonds used to finance governmental capital improvements such as public buildings, reads, infrastructure improvements, community centers, etc. AMOUNI~. Variable REQUIREMENTS. This form of debt requires a public vote for approval. SOURCE: Loan. Private banking industry. L10 Adopt-a-"Light" Program DESCRIPTION. As' a~unique method for paying for street lighting fixtures, a small projected plaque sign could be affixed to the light pole with the name or logo of the local merchanFbusiness/person/entity who purchased the fixtures. This program can also be applied to historic plaques, benches, trees, artwork, paving surfaces, banners, etc. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENT~. Varies SOURCE: Coordinated through 'City, Chamber, or local non-profit organizations. Lll 501 (c)(3) Bonds DESCRIPTION. Nonprofit, 601 (c)(3) organizations may now borrow for land purchases, and financing, acquisition, design and/or improvement of facilities. Museums, performing arts, theaters, social services (e.g., teen centers), historical societies and others are included. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS'. Must be 501 (c)(3) organization. SOURCE: Banks. L12 Revenue Bonds DESCRIPTION. Debt undertaken wherein payback is tied to specific revenue streams. This form of debt does not require a public vote. Common uses include industrial development, housing and social services. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS: Requires local government support. SOURCE: Private banking industry STATE ! REGIONAL GOVERNMENT RESOURCES Sl Downtown Rebound Program (DRP) DESCRIPTION. In November 2000, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) announced the availability of funding in the amount of $18.5 million for the adaptive reuse of existing structures and up to $2.3 million for the development of vacant land and trensit- oriented mixed income and mixed use developments. Major emphasis is on adaptive reuse of existing commemial or industrial structures to residential units, infill development of vacant or soon to be vacant properties that dempnstrate a reduction in infrastructure costs and environmental consequences. AMOUNT'. Contact source. REQUIREMENT~. Projects generally must include some affordable housing component. For profit and not-for-profits eligible. Contact source for additional information. SOURCE:' California Department of Housing and Community Develop~ment (HCD); Contact 916-327-2881 or ~ www.hcd.ca.gov/ca/drp S2 Environmental and Mitigation Fund DESCRIPTION. The California State Department of Trensportation (CALTRANS) has established this state fund for beautification improvements to roadsides to mitigate the effects of transportation projects. AMOUNT'. Typical grants range from $200,000 to $250,000. REQUIREMENTS'. Up to 25% local matching is usually required. SOURCE: CALTRANS, www.dot.ca..qov S3 Safe Routes to School Program DESCRIPTION. On October 6, 1999, Governor Davis signed AB 1475 (Soto) which created a new traffic safety program in California. The goal is to demonstrate and evaluate the effectiveness of a "Safe Routes to School" program. This new act became effective January 1,2000 and will remain in effect until January 1, 2002, unless a later enacted statute deletes or extends that date. Recent grants have funded the following types of infrastructure projects: installation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; crosswalk painting; raised crosswalks; traffic control devices; bicycle pedestrian paths; safety lighting. AMOUNT'. Varies - contact soume REQUIREMENTS. Contact soume SOURCE: California Department of Transportation - DISTRICT 5; Contact Jerry. Gibbs@dot.ca.gov or 805-542-4606 www.dot.ca.qov/hq/LocalProqrams/saferoute LocaI.Proqrams @dot.ca.qov S5 California Main Street DESCRIPTION. As a member of the California Main Street program, technical assistance is available. Helping cities and towns revitalize their downtown or neighborhood commercial district. It organizes a district's comprehensive revitalization efforts into a four-point framework: organization, promotion, design, and economic restructuring. This framework ensures the district's place as a vital economic, social and cultural center of the community. AMOUN1~. Non-monetary assistance REQUIREMENTS. California Main Street's application requirements are designed to identify communities that will work effectively to revitalize their downtown and/or neighborhood commercial district. A desire to provide the greatest social, community and economic returns consistent with long- standing Main Street "guiding principles" and practices guide California Main Street's policies and criteria. On behalf of its downtown or neighborhood commercial district, any California community may apply to the California Trade and Commerce Agency to receive designation as a Certified California Main Street Community. A local government collabOrates with a community organization such as a downtown business association, revitalization organization, chamber of commerce, or 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation to jointly complete the application process and submit an application fee. SOURCE: California Trade and Commeme Agency - Main Street Program Manager, (916) 322-3536, www.com merce.ca..qov/business/select/commu nities/mainstreet S6 Office of Permit Assistance (OPA) DESCRIPTION. The Office of Permit Assistance (OPA) is the only agency of its type mandated to act in a non-regulatory role to directly assist economic development in California. OPA advocates streamlining of all statewide and local environmental permitting processes from an economic development perspective, complying with state and federal law and regulations, and maintaining high environmental standards. AMOUNT'. Non-monetary REQUIREMEN~ Contact source SOURCE: Office of Permit Assistance Manager, California Office of Permit Assistance California Trade and Commerce Agency, 801 "K" Street, Suite 1700, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 322-4245, www.commeme.ca.qov/business/permits assist/index S7 Certified Local Government (CLG) DESCRIPTION. The CLG program is a national program designed to encourage the direct participation of a local government in the identification, registration, and preservation of historic properties located within the jurisdiction of the local government. Becoming a CLG can provide local staff and commissions the tools, technical training, and more meaningful leadership roles in the preservation of the community's heritage. Benefits of becoming a CLG include: 1) Eligibility for federal grants from the Historic Preservation Fund administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. 2) Direct participation in the nomination of historic properties to the National Register of Historic Places. 3) Opportunity for enhanced responsibilities to review and comment on development projects compliance with federal environmental regulations, thereby expediting the review time. 4) Special technical assistance and training for local preservation commission members and staff from the State Historic Preservation Office. 5) Potential for participation in the review of building rehabilitation plans for federal investment tax credits. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS: Local governments may be certified to participate in the CLG program by complying with the five minimum responsibilities of a CLG..Lecal governments must: 1) Enforce appropriate state and local legislation for the designation and protection of historic properties; 2) Establish an adequate and qualified historic preservation review commission by local law; 3) Maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic properties; 4) Provide for adequate public participation in the local historic preservation, including the process of reviewing and recommending properties for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places; and 5) Satisfactorily perform the responsibilities delegated to it by the state. SOURCE: Local Government Unit, Office of Historic Preservation, P.O. Box 942896, Sacramento, CA 94296-0001, phone (916) 653-6624, fax (916) 653-9824 http://www2.cr, nps.qov/clq or ohp.cal- parks.ca.qov/proqrams/Iocal - California State Parks S8 The California Division of Tourism (CalTour) DESCRIPTION:. The California Division of Tourism is designed to increase tourism to and within California. CalTour provides various programs supporting rural tourism development and promotion in order to help rural communities diversify their economies. REQUIREMENt. Contact source SOURCE: California Division of Tourism, Contact the Rural Tourism Liasion at (916)-322-1266. www.qocalif.qov S9 Urban Forestry Grant Program: Trees for the Millenlum DESCRIPTION:. This program provides grants for local governments to pumhase trees, which are environmentally tolerant and high quality. Trees must be on public property, and projects must be completed within 18 months of project award. The City can apply and receive awards for up to four years in a row. AMOUNT'. Variable, up to $50,000 REQUIREMENTS. Contact source SOURCE: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Urban Forestry Program. www.fire.ca.qov/ResourceManaqement/UrbanForestry ,2524 Mulberry Street, Riverside CA 92501 (909-782-4140) (Morgan Hill office - 408-779-2121 ). Leaf-It-To-Us: Kid's Crusade for Treesl DESCRIPTION. This tree planting grant program is a statewide campaign designed to provide opportunities to involve Califomia's primary and secondary school students to become more knowledgeable in the benefits trees play in providing for livable communities, improving the global environment, and making improvements to their local learning environment. The program provides funds for community tree planting projects initiated and undertaken by school kids in partnership with school volunteers for local governments to pumhase trees, which are environmentally tolerant and high quality. Trees must be on public property, and projects must be completed within 18 months of project award. The City can apply and receive awards for up to four years in a row. AMOUNT'. Minimum request is $500; maximum request is $3,000 REQUIREMENTS. Local governments; Public and private non-profit schools with affiliated parent support organizations may apply; funds targeted for K-12th grades. SOURCE: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, 2524 Mulberry Street, Riverside CA 92501 (909-782-4140). Eric oldar@fire.ca.qov; (Morgan Hill office: 408-779-2121) www.fi re .ca. qov/Res ou me Manaqement/U rban Forestry Sll California ReLeaf DESCRIPTION. The California ReLeaf Network is a growing alliance of community-based organizations that share the common goals of planting and protecting trees, fostering an ethic of environmental stewardship, and promoting citizen involvement. The California ReLeaf Network was formed in 1991 to provide a forum for exchange, education and mutual support for community-based tree-planting and stewardship groups. Through membership in the network, groups build their organizational and technical skills; share their enthusiasm, experiences, and ideas; address issues of common concern; and work together to advance urban forestry throughout the state. Grants available to projects that plant large-crowning, environmentally tolerant trees on public property to provide shade and other benefits. The grants can be awarded to citizen groups and city affiliated volunteer entities. AMOUNT'. Variable, up to $5,000 REQUIREMENTS. Contact source SOURCE: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; Contact the Trust for Public Land at: 116 New Montgomery St., 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 495-5660 FAX (415) 495-0541, sla@tpl.or.q or MarthaOzonoff@tol.om; www.tpl.orR S12 Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP) Grants (Prop111) ~ DESCRIPTION. Three categories of projects are eligible, among them ~highway landscaping and urban forestry." The City can pursue this for the purchase, installation, and maintenance of street trees. Projects must be designed to mitigate the environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities but do not have to be within the road right- of-way. ~ AMOUNT'. Variable, up to $500,000 REQUIREMENTS'. Contact source SOURCE: State of California Resources Agency, EEMP Coordinator (916-653-5656); ~ FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RESOURCES F1 Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD): Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) DESCRIPTION. Provides partial funding for public infrastructure to support industrial and business expansion. Also downtown revitalization projects, Iow-income housing, physical infrastructure, Iow-income jobs, and reduction of blight. AMOUNT'. Variable, up to $500,000 REQUIREMENTS. Grants to cities and counties only, with sub-recipients (nonprofits) common. Project must benefit Iow and moderate-income households, maximum of $10,000 per new job. SOURCE: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); 202- 708-3176; www.hud.qov F2 HUD: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Technical Assistance DESCRIPTION. To increase the effectiveness with which states and units of general local government plan, develop, and administer their Community Development Block Grant Programs. AMOUNT Variable, $2.5 million was awarded in FY99. REQUIREMENTS. State and local govemments, and public and private nonprofits. SOURCE: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); 202- 708-3176; www.hud.qov F3 HUD: Brownfields Economic Development Initiative DESCRIPTION. To help public entities redevelop abandoned, idled, or under-used real property, where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived contamination. AMOUNT'. Variable, $25 million was awarded in FY99. REQUIREMENTS. Any public entity eligible to apply for a Section 108 loan. SOURCE: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); 202- 708-3176; www.hud.qov F5 Economic Development Administration (EDA) Rural Development Through Tourism DESCRIPTION. The EDA has provided strategy grants to perform regional and local studies for assessing the feasibility of tourism activities. EDA has also provided public works grants for local public infrastructure necessary to accommodate tourism activity. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS: Contact soume SOURCE: Economic Development Administration; contact 888-693-1370. F6 National Foundation on the Arts/National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) - Design Program DESCRIPTION. To promote excellence in the design of cities, towns, buildings, and landscapes; and in graphic, interior, and product design. Projects are funded that create design awareness, produce new designs, develop design talent, and otherwise improve the practices and techniques of the design disciplines: architecture, landscape architecture, urban design and planning, historic preservation, graphic, industrial and product design, and interior design, costume and clothing design. The program's mission is to create a clearer understanding and recognition of good design, conserve design history and heritage, and invigorate informed discussion and criticism, and creativity in approaching design problems. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS'. Grants may be used for a variety of activities. There are no funds for capital improvements and construction, general operating costs, school tuition, or debt elimination. SOURCE: Director, Design Program, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 627, Washington, DC 20506 arts.endow.qov (202) 682-5437, (202) 682-5669 fax. For a great resource on available culture and arts funding opportunities, also visit arts.endow.qov/federal F7 US Department of the Interior: Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings DESCRIPTION. A part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, this act establishes; (1) a 20% tax credit for the substantial rehabilitation of historic buildings for commercial, industrial and rental residential purposes, and a 10% tax credit for the substantial rehabilitation for nonresidential purposes of buildings built before 1936; (2) a straight-line depreciation period of 27.5 years for residential property and 31.5 years for nonresidential property for the depreciable basis of the rehabilitated building reduced by the amount of the tax credit claims. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS'. The 10% tax credit is not available for rehabilitation of certified historic structures, and owners who have properties within registered historic districts and who wish to elect this credit must obtain certification that their buildings are not historic. SOURCE: U. $. Department of the Interior, National Park Service and National Conference of State Historic Preservation Offices. F8 Small Business Administration (SBA) Guaranteed Loans (7a Program) DESCRIPTION. To provide assistance to small businesses in obtaining financing for up to 90 percent of a loan made by a commercial lending institution. Projects might include: land and/or building purchases; new building construction and/or building renovation; machinery and equipment purchases; leasehold improvements; acquisition of inventory; financing of working capital; or reduction of trade debt. This program allows real estate loans of up to 25 years and working capital loans of up to 7 years. The rate for SBA 7(a) Guaranteed Loans may not exceed the prime rate by more than 2.75 percent. Loans may be either fixed or variable rate. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS: For-profit businesses meeting the following size limitations: 1) Retail and service: Sales do not exceed $3.5 million; 2) Wholesale: Employees do not exceed 100 people; 3) Manufacturing: Eml~loyees do not exceed 500 people; and 4) Construction: Sales average of less than $17.0 million for past 3 years. SOURCE: U.S. Small Business Administration - www.sba.qov; San Francisco office is 415-744-6820. Private Banks are the ultimate source of loans. F9 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Environmental Education Grants DESCRIPTION. Funding for projects to meet one or more of the following objectives: to improve environmental education by enhancing environmental teaching skills; to facilitate communication, information exchange, and partnerships; to motivate the general public to be more environmentally conscious, resulting in informed decisions about the environment. AMOUNT. Grants can range up to $250,000. EPA is encouraging requests for $5,000 or less, in keeping with the statutory requirement that 25% of all funds awarded must not be larger than that amount. REQUIREMENTS: The project should also develop an environmental education practice, method, or technique which is new or significantly improved; may have wide application; addresses an environmental issue which is of a high priority. Individuals are not eligible for grants, only organizations. SOURCE: Environmental Education Grants, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (800) 424-4372. www.epa.qov Fl0 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Innovative Community Partnerships (ICP Grants) DESCRIPTION. An EPA community grants initiative to support communities' efforts to solve their environmental problems and make their communities more livable places to live, work, raise families, and participate in community life. To promote smart growth (development that serves the economy, community, and the environment) and cleaner, more livable communities, EPA will use ICP grants as tools for encouraging local innovation, cross-media environmental approaches, and community partnerships working to achieve measurable results. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENT'. Priority consideration for: 1) restoration and protection of community watersheds and airsheds; 2) integrated community planning for environmental results; 3) environmentally responsible redevelopment and revitalization. SOURCE: Environmental Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; www. epa.gov/region09, (415) 744-1305, Email: r9.info@epa.gov Fll National Heritage Area Act DESCRIPTION. Encourages local, state, and federal governments to develop heritage areas. AMOUNT'. None - indirect REQUIREMENTS. Contact source. SOURCE: National Park Service. F12 Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century (H.R. 2400) DESCRIPTION. TEA-21 gives local governments unprecedented flexibility in developing a mix of highway corridor enhancements, with funds for such projects as public transit, bikeways, highway enhancements, recreation, historic 'preservation, scenic byways, and other alternatives to address transportation and community needs. Contact source for funding amounts. States and localities are permitted to use federal dollars (provided primarily from the gas tax) for more flexibly to meet their transportation needs. More comprehensive planning, taking into account such factors as desired land use patterns and environmental effects, is required as a prerequisite to federal funding. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS. Visit www.dot.ca.qov/hq/TransEnhAct for details and application or call Marsha Mason @ 916-654-5275. SOURCE: U.S. Dept. of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration; Caltrans F13 Surface Transportation Program DESCRIPTION. The STP provides flexible funding that may be used by States and localities for projects on any Federal-aid highway, including the NHS, bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects and intracity and intemity bus terminals and facilities. AMOUNT'. Contact soume. REQUIREMENTS: Contact soume. SOURCE: U.S. Dept. of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration; www.fhwa.dot..qov; Caltrans. F14 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Job Access Grants Program DESCRIPTION. The main goals of the program are to: · Provide transportation services in urban, suburban, and rural areas to assist welfare recipients and other Iow-income individuals in accessing employment opportunities. · Increase collaboration among regional transportation providers, human service agencies, employers, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), states, and affected communities and individuals. Job Access projects will implement new or expanded transportation Services to transport individuals to and from jobs and other employment- related support services. Eligible activities for the Job Access component include: Adding late-night and weekend service, providing a guaranteed- ride-home service, providing shuttle service, extending fixed-route mass transit service, providing demand-responsive van service, sponsoring ridesharing and carpooling activities, and encouraging bicycling. AMOUNT'. Variable, total of $75 million REQUIREMENTS. Local governments, states, metropolitan planning organizations, public transit agencies, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, and designated recipients under other FTA programs. SOURCE: For more information, visit www.fta.dot.qov/wtw. Or contact Doug Birnie, Office of Research Management, TRI-30, Federal Transit Administration, Room 9409, 400 7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-0176; fax (202) 366-3765; email douglas.birnie@fta.dot.gov F15 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Livable Communities Initiative DESCRIPTION. The Federal Transit Administration initiated the Livable Communities Initiative to strengthen the link between transit and communities. Transit facilities and services that promote more livable communities are ones which are customer-friendly, community-oriented and well designed resulting from a planning and design process With active community involvement. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS'. Threshold factors will include evidence that the project: 1) resulted from a community planning process and contains community endorsement; 2) increases access to jobs, educational opportunities, or social services; 3) incorporates community services or other transit and pedestrian-oriented mixed use developments, and; 4) provides opportunities for small or disadvantaged business participation in the planing, design, and implementation phases of the project. SOURCE: Federal Transit Administration, 201 Mission Street, Suite 2210, San Francisco, CA 94105-1800, (415) 744-3133; www.fta.dot.qov/library/plannin.q/livbro F17 U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Transportation & Community and System Preservation Pilot Program ('rcsP) DESCRIPTION. To develop programs that demonstrate the short- and long-term environmental, economic, and social equity effects to help build sustainable communities. The Transportation and Community and System Preservation Pilot Program is a comprehensive initiative of reseamh and grants to investigate the relationships between transportation and community and system preservation and private sector-based initiatives. States, local governments, and metropolitan planning organizations are eligible for discretionary grants to plan and implement strategies that improve the efficiency of the transportation system; reduce environmental impacts of transportation; reduce the need for costly future public infrastructure investments; ensure efficient access to jobs, services, and centers of trade; and examine private sector development patterns and investments that support these goals. AMOUNT'. Variable. A total of $120 million is authorized for this program for 1999-2003. REQUIREMENTS. State agencies, local governments, metropolitan planning organizations, transit agencies, school boards, air resource boards, park districts, and other public agencies. SOURCE: Contact Susan Petty, (202) 366-0106 at the United States Federal Highway Administration, or visit www.fhwa.dot.qov/tcsp F18 Millennium Trails Program DESCRIPTION. Millennium Trails is a national program that will celebrate, recognize and be a catalyst for creating trails to "honor the past and imagine the future" as part of America's legacy for the year 2000. AMOUNT'. Non-monetary REQ~IIREMENTS: Contact source SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, S- 3, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590; ~ F19 National Park Service, Rivers & Trails DESCRIPTION. The Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (Rivers & Trails) program of the National Park Service offers local groups two kinds of assistance with locally-led conservation projects: staff assistance and consultations. AMOUNT'. Non-monetary assistance. REQUIREMENT'. Staff assistance requires a written application. No written application is needed for a consultation; just call the nearest Rivers & Trails office and ask for an appointment. SOURCE: Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance - National Park Service, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94107-1372 Fax (415) 744-4043, Barbara Rice: Barbara Rice@nps.qov (415) 427- 1449 F20 National Park Service Technical Assistance DESCRIPTION. Provide technical assistance and/or staff to assist in historic preservation, interpretation, and/or recreation. AMOUNT'. Non-monetary assistance. REQUIREMENT& Contact source. SOURCE: National Park Service; www.nps.qov/lec;acv/support NOT-FOR-PROFIT/VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATIONS N1 California Preservation Foundation DESCRIPTION. The Foundation board members and staff offer a wide range of experience and skills -- from architecture, engineering and planning, to finance and preservation law. Board members volunteer their time and knowledge to work at the state and local level, promoting and encouraging a broad spectrum of preservation activities. Assisted in more that 100 preservatioh projects each year, helping local citizens and organizations preserve their historic buildings and protect their local landmarks. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS. Contact source SOURCE; CPF, 1611 Telegraph, Suite 820, Oakland, CA 94612. 510/763- 0972,. e-mail office @californiapreservation.or.q N2 The National Trust for Historic Preservation - Preservation Services Fund DESCRIPTION. Provides matching grants to nonprofit organizations, universities, and public agencies to initiate preservation projects. Funds may be used to support consultants with professional expertise in areas such as architecture, law, planning, economics and graphic design; conferences that address subjects of particular importance to historic preservation. AMOUNT'. Variable, Grants range from $500 to $5,000. REQUIREMENTS. Nonprofit organizations, government agencies SOURCE: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036; 202-558-6054; comm partners@ nthp.orq; www.nationaltrust.or.q N3 The National Trust for Historic Preservation - National Preservation Loan Fund (NPLF) DESCRIPTION. Provides below-market-rate loans to help preserve properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Funds may be used to create or expand local and statewide preservation revolving funds, for site acquisition or rehabilitation work, and to preserve National Historic Landmarks. AMOUNT'. Variable, up to $150,000 REQUIREMENTS'. Tax-exempt nonprofit organizations and local governments. SOURCE: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue, NVV Washington, D.C. 20036; 202-588-6054; corem partners @ nthp.or.q; www.nationaltrust.orq N4 The National Trust for Historic Preservation - The Johanna Favrot Fund DESCRIPTION. Offers grants for projects that contribute to businesses and individuals for projects that contribute to the preservation or the recapture of an authentic sense of place. May be used to obtain professional expertise in areas such as architecture, planning, archeology or media relations; sponsoring preservation conferences and workshops; and designing and~ implementing innovative preservation education programs. AMOUNT'. Variable, from $2,000 to $25,000 REQUIREMENTS. Nonprofit organizations, government agencies, for- profit businesses and individuals. SOURCE: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Avenue,- NW Washington, DC 20036 202-588-6054; comm partners @ nthp.orq; www.nationaltrust.or.q N5 The National Trust for Historic Preservation -"Banc" of America Historic Tax Credit Fund DESCRIPTION. The Fund will seek to acquire an interest in historic properties that qualify for Federal and state historic tax credits and provide economic or community development benefits for the surrounding commemial or residential neighborhoods. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS: Eligible projects include histodc properties that will be rehabilitated for community development purposes, including: market-rate, mixed-income or affordable housing; mixed-use facilities; office and retail space; and nonprofit and government facilities. SOURCE: Partnership with Bank of America. 1785 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 588-6000, fax (202) 588- 6038, www.nationalt rust.orq N6 The National Trust for Historic Preservation - Critical Issues Fund (ClF) DESCRIPTIOI~. The ClF was created to help local communities resolve major disputes involving historic preservation and urban development. ClF model project and reseamh grants are intended to support studies or other activities that address widespread, pressing preservation problems. Competitive model projects range from $5,000 to $25,000 and must be matched on a "one to one" basis. AMOUNT'. Variable, $5,000 - $25,000 REQUIREMENt. Contact source SOURCE: The National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1785 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20036, Phone: 202-588-6000 Fax: 202-588-6038 www.nationaltrust.or.q N7 Heritage Tourism Initiative DESCRIPTION. Offers comprehensive technical assistance for heritage tourism development and marketing. AMOUNT'. Contact soume REQUIREMENTS. Contact source SOURCE: National Trust for Historic Preservation. Call State Historic Preservation Office; . N8 Save America's Treasures Program DESCRIPTION. A private / public partnership between White House Millennium Council and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The funds are directed to support historic preservation and conservation project work on historic properties, artifacts, and collections. Funding is available for restoration/conservation work on historic places, properties, artifacts, collections, monuments and works of art. Recipient projects must be of national significance and must be threatened, endangered or demonstrate urgent need. Project work must also support some element of education, interpretation or training. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENT'. Non-federal match is required at a 50:50 ratio. SOURCE: Millennium Grants Coordinator, Heritage Preservation Services, 1849 C Street, NW - NC200, Washington, DC 20240, www.saveamericastreasu res.or.q (202)343-1146 N9 Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) DESCRIPTION. A nonprofit organization that purchases development loans from community-based development organizations and government agencies. This secondary market function makes it possible for local communities and nonprofit organizations to raise money for new projects by selling their existing loans. CRF purchases a variety of loan types. In addition, CRF also offers contract portfolio management, portfolio review, training, and capacity building. AMOUNT. Contact source. REQUIREMENTS. Contact source. SOURCE: CRF,.2400 Foshay Tower, 821 Marquette Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55402; 612-338-3050; www.crfusa.com N10 AmeriCorps DESCRIPTION. The mission of the Corporation is to engage Americans of all ages and backgrounds in community based service. The Corporation for National Service fosters civic responsibility by providing educational opportunities for those who make a substantial commitment to service in a variety of areas related to the environment and community development. AmeriCorps programs provide members with a full or part-time service experience, a living stipend and education award from the Corporation for National Service Trust Fund. AMOUNT. Americorps Members serving one full year of service provide 1,700 hours of volunteer time and part-time Members provide 900 volunteer hours. REQUIREMENT. The Corporation requires a 15% cash match for AmeriCorps member support cost and 33% cash or in-kind match of the overall operating program costs. State commissions may add additional match requirements. A Member must have U.S. Citizenship or legal alien status in the U.S.; be 17 years of age or older; and must be a high school graduate or agree to achieve a GED prior to receiving education awards. SOURCE: Charles Supple, Executive Director, 1110 K Street, Suite 210, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 323-7646 (916) 323-3227 fax, dmuraki @ cilts.ca.gov; www.cns.qov Nll BRICK Award for Community Leadership DESCRIPTION. Founded in 1993, UDo Something" is a national nonprofit organization sponsoring several programs and grants that encourage/enable young people to serve as community leaders to effect positive change by providing funds for physical projects. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS: "Do Something's" BRICK Award is available to all individuals under the age of 30 who wish to improve their community ~brick by brick". SOURCE: www.dosomethin.q.com PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS P1 America the Beautiful Fund DESCRIPTION. To assist and encourage realistic grassroots efforts to improve community life, rescue and revive American cultural and historical sites and traditions and develop community self-reliance. AMOUNT'. Variable. Contact source. REQUIREMENTS. Local projects to protect, enhance or restore a community that have bread-scale participation by a significant number of people and can be given an immediate try-out or testing period. SOURCE: America the Beautiful Fund, 1511 K Street, N.W., Suite 611, Washington, DC 20005; contact Nanine Bilski, president, 202-638-1649. P2 The David and Lucile Packard Foundation DESCRIPTION. Arts - A funding area of the Packard Foundation includes the Arts. Funds are available for institutional support for nonprofit arts organizations, improving arts education, or upgrading or renovating arts facilities. AMOUNT. Variable' ~ REQUIREMENT'. Funds must not be for direct benefit an individual or religious institution. Contact source for additional information. SOURCE: 300 Second Street, Suite 200, Los Altos, CA 94022, (650) 948- 7658; www.~ackf~ P3 Getty Grant Program (Architectural Conservation Grants) DESCRIPTION. Architectural Conservation Grants are designed to support the preservation of buildings of outstanding architectural, historical, and cultural significance. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENT. Nonprofit, charitable organizations are eligible to apply. Funding is available for the development of thorough research and documentation in preparation for a property's long-term preservation; support is also available on a highly selective basis for actual conservation intervention. Projects must focus on the historic structure and fabric of building(s), and should also address conservation issues related to the building's urban or rural settings. SOURCE: John James Oddy, Program Officer, The Getty Grant Program, 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 800, Los Angeles, CA 90049-1685, (310) 440-7320, (310) 440-7703 fax; www..qetty.edu/.qrant/qcons P4 The Bay Foundation DESCRIPTION. To preserve biological diversity; to support Native American cultural heritage preservation and economic development programs; to enhance children's services and educational programs; to reserve the cultural and natural history collections and training in museums, zoos, libraries, and botanical gardens. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS. Contact source SOURCE: 17 West 94~h Street, New York, NY 10025 (212) 663-1115 P5 Bretzlaff Foundation DESCRIPTION. The Foundation supports ethnic & folk arts and resource conservation. Provides grants for project/program support and specializes in cultural resources and land-use planning. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS: Nonprofit organizations SOURCE: President, 4700 Plumas Street, Reno, NV 89509; (702) 333- 0300 P7 Butler Foundation DESCRIPTION. Funding priorities include conservation, historic preservation, religion, youth, and women. Specialty areas include land acquisition/protection, cultural resources. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENTS: Grant use for Project/Program Support SOURCE: c/o Charter Trust Company, PO Box 2530, Concord, NH 03302; {603) 224-1350 P8 Verizon Foundation DESCRIPTION. Community performing and Visual Arts, Arts in Education Programs. Support for local communities, targeting organizations with a broad outreach for diverse populations serving in large urban cities to small rural towns. AMOUNT'. Contact source REQUIREMENT'. Contact source SOURCE: Carolyn Henke, carol.henke@telops..qte.com P9 The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation DESCRIPTION. Program supports efforts to; Generate new knowledge about community dynamics and community-building, and about the relationships between community characteristics and individual development. Enhance the capacity of community residents to organize, to mobilize their own resources, and to obtain and use external resources. Support, evaluate, and strengthen community-improvement initiatives, especially in education, public safety, economic opportunity, and recreation. AMOUNT'. Contact source. REQUIREMENT& Contact source. SOURCE: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, 140 South Dearborn Street, Suite 1100, Chicago, IL. 60603-5285. 312-920- 6285. P10 Aetna Foundation DESCRIPTION. Provides funding in the following areas; Matching funds, employee matching gifts, employee-related scholarships, scholarship funds, special projects, annual campaigns, and renovation projects. Urban affairs, minorities, law and justice, youth, education, arts, community development, employment, AIDS, higher education, disadvantaged, housing, insurance ~education, leadership development, international affairs, literacy, performing arts, educational associations, and urban development. AMOUNT:. Contact source. REQUIREMENTS: Giving limited to organizations in the U.S. No support for religious organizations for religious purposes, private secondary schoqls,.-Political activities, or sporting events. SOURCE: Aetna Foundation, 151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, CT 06156-3180; 203-273-1932. Pll The Nathan Cummings Foundation DESCRIPTION. The Foundation seeks to build a society that values nature and protects ecological balance for future generations: promotes humane health care; and fosters arts to enrich communities. AMOUNT'. Grants range from $5,000 to $300,000. REQUIREMENT~ Contact source. SOURCE: The Nathan Cummings Foundation, 1926 Broadway, Suite 600, New York, NY 10023. 212-787-7300. P12 The Rockefeller Foundation DESCRIPTION. Supports groups and communities undertaking change that is culturally informed and builds on diversity. The Foundation identifies community-based, cooperative and culturally grounded initiatives that are building on diversity. AMOUNT. Contact source. REQUIREMENTS. Contact source. SOURCE: The Rockefeller Foundation, 420 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10018. P13 Bristol-Myers Squibb Civic and Community Services Grants DESCRIPTION. In contributing to civic activities, the fund seeks to support organizations whose efforts are directed toward three specific objectives: to help strengthen economic and community development; to provide equal opportunity and job training for socially or economically disadvantaged groups; and to improve the operation of the US system of law and justice. AMOUNT. Contact source. REQUIREMENTS. Any nonprofit organization may submit a written request containing a brief statement of history, goals and accomplishments; statement of purpose for which the grant is requested; amount requested and list of current funding sources; current annual report and list of board members; copy of IRS tax-exempt letter; copy of organization's most recent income tax return; and current year's operating budget and most recent audited financial statements. SOURCE: Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co Foundation, 345 Park Ave., Ste 4364, New York, NY 10154; contact Grants Administrator, 212~546-4331. P14 Candle Foundation Grants DESCRIPTION. The Foundation is the philanthropic arm of the Candle Corporation and funds education and cultural programs worldwide involved in community investment and redevelopment, education and information dissemination, preventive health care, medical research, and efforts to combat hunger and homelessness. AMOUNT. $1000 - $10,000 REQUIREMENTS. 501 (c) (3) nonprofits are eligible for grant support. SOURCE: Candle Foundation, 2425 Olympic Blvd., Santa Monica, CA 90404; contact Martha Mossawir, 310-829-5800, fax: 310-582-4208, P16 Other Private Donations DESCRIPTION. Private donations for a variety of different types of projects are generally available from foundations, institutions and corporations that have major interests in these areas. AMOUNT'. Variable REQUIREMENTS. Varies SOURCE: Varies 3. Banner Program A. What is a Banner Program A banner program is the plan that covers all aspects of establishing and maintianing the ongoing use of a municipal banner system. The program should be developed through a partnership of the City and a Banner Advisory Committee. A banner system consists of all the items included in the installation of banners, from hardware to fabric banners. B. Purpose of a Banner Program The use of banners is an immediate and inexpensive way of enhancing and promoting Historic Route 66. Banners accomplish the following: · Enhances the aesthetic environment · Unifies the appearance of the streetscape · Introduces color and a sense of excitement to an area Communicates and promotes cultural and civic events. · Provides an alternative to typical seasonal displays C. Implementation It is recommended that a Banner Advisory Committee be formed to assist in the development and implementation of a Banner Program. This committee should be empowered through legislation by the City to govern the program. The Banner Advisory Committee should be authorized through city ordinance to develop and administer the Banner Program. The Banner Advisory Committee, should be an appointed body determined by appropriate representatives. It should consist of five to ten individuals who represent local businesses, the city, non-profit organizations and concemed citizens. A committee member may serve a two-year term with the option for re-appointment. The Banner Advisory Committee should have the final vote on all issues, interpretation and rules governing the Banner Program. D. Banner Program Responsibilities Municipality: · Provides use of street light poles · Forms Banner Program, including the Banner Advisory Committee · Through local ordinances, allows the Banner Advisory Committee overall control of the Banner Program · Installs and maintains banners and mounting hardware · Aids in fundraising and implementation Banner Advisory Committee: · Serves as overall Banner Program coordinator · Determines banner locations · Serves as liaison between sponsoring organizations Approves graphic concepts for all banners · Provides marketing and fundraising E. Product Description A banner system consists of banners and mounting hardware. Because exterior banners are subjected to weather extremes it is recommended that the Banner Advisory Committee should develop its own list of requirements in selecting suppliers. For greatest durability, banners should be made with synthetic (or synthetic blend) exterior fabrics which ara warranted for their color fastness and durability. Vinyl coated fabric are suitable when less expensive and slightly durable banners ara desired. Some caution is advised ragarding strength. Other vinyl materials are available that are heavier in weight and durable. Less durable banners tend to be of nylon fabric. Nylon is an excellent, lightweight material for flags but is not as strong or as colorfast as other fabrics. Mounting hardwara is the most important part of a Banner Program. Without a strong and durable mounting bracket it doesn't matter how good your banners are. In selecting mounting brackets make sure to consider corrosion resistant materials. The use of fiberglass arms and temperad aluminum castings is recommended for maximum durability and weather rasistance. F. Historic Route 66 Banner Concept As part of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Program, it is intended that the initial or primary banner design be consistent with the Historic Route 66 theme. The following are initial recommendations only, and should be used as a guide for the Banner Advisory Committee. The custom banners should be attached to existing cobra head light poles, or to any new light poles as implemented with this program. The banners should be 30" by 60" (VFB) vertical format straet banners, with a custom design as shown. Recommended Bracket attachments: BannerFlex Brackets by Kalamazoo Banner Custom Banner 30" x 60" Works (or similar) with fiberglass arms which Fabric: KaIBan 100% marine acrylic by flex in extrame winds. Kalamazoo Banner Works (or similar) 0 0 ~ 0 G. Maintenance Maintaining banners require minimal effort when banners and mounting hardware are of high quality and are properly installed. Occasionally banners and/or mounting hardware may be defective rather than improperly maintained. The City is encouraged to keep a close eye on banners during extreme weather conditions. Banners that are used during a long period of time may become soiled during natural weather conditions. It is recommended that banners be cleaned manually periodically. H. Banner Placement/Distribution Some areas to consider for banner placement are: · Initial installation at Activity Centers First entire block at each Gateway entry area · One block in each direction from the Interstate 15 freeway · Eventually the entire length of Foothill Boulevard The Banner Advisory Committee shall determine the distribution of the banners. They may decide that every light pole could have banners or that every other pole is better. The Banner Advisory Committee may also choose to place banners just on the four poles on comers of street intersections. I. Financing a Banner Program Various sources for funding a Banner Program may include: · Assistance from the local chamber of commerce · Downtown Business Association · Local fund raising events · Grants from federal and state agencies and local foundations · Sponsorship by local businesses · City's general fund for holiday decorations The source of the information provided is from the Banner Program Guidebook prepared by Kalamazoo BannerWorks, Fifth Edition, November 1997. P, efertothis guidebookfor more details. h:/pada/10100564/banner program.wpd 4. GRANT WRITING Competition for community and economic development resoumes is fieme. Nevertheless, there are hundreds of resources available that might be tapped for a wide variety of improvement projects. Generally, competitiveness depends upon four key traits: 1. Strategic rationale fo~ the project as demonstrated in the Visual Improvement Plan. 2. Demonstrated broad public support for the project 3. Significant local matching funds and in-kind contributions (i.e., tangible local commitment) 4. Demonstrated organizational capacity to complete the project (and/or manage it, if appropriate) The City of Rancho Cucamonga should ensure that each of these traits is addressed as it moves forward with the Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Then it should define those resoumes most needed to assist local establishments and public works. Important resoumes currently unavailable should be sought to build the network necessary to accomplish key programs and projects. A variety of resources are listed in Section 3.3 that may be used for implementation of the Plan. These resources include funding and technical assistance from federal, state, regional, local and private nonprofit entities. Keep in mind that all potential outside supporters will seriously consider local investment and fundraising efforts. The greater local commitment, the more competitive the community will be for outside assistance. Toward this end, the Chamber of Commerce, RDA, and coordination of volunteer labor may be particularly valuable. The following grant wdting advice is borrowed from the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance web site (www.cfda.qov/public/cat-writln¢~. Although the information is geared toward the preparation of federal government grant proposals, much of it also applies to non-profit and private sector grants and assistance and will be helpful when preparing grant applications to implement various aspects of the Visual Improvement Plan. PART ONE: DEVELOPING A GRANT PROPOSAL Preparation : A successful grant proposal is one that is well-prepared, thoughtfully planned, and concisely packaged. The potential applicant should become familiar with all of the pertinent program criteria related to the Catalog program from which assistance is sought. Refer to the information contact person listed in the Catalog program description before developing a proposal to obtain information such as whether funding is available, when applicable deadlines occur, and the process used by the grantor agency for accepting applications. Applicants should remember that the basic requirements, application forms, information and procedures vary with the Federal agency making the grant award. Individuals without prior grant proposal writing experience may find it useful to attend a grantsmanship workshop. A workshop can amplify the basic information presented here. Applicants interested in additional readings on grantsmanship and proposal development should explore library resources. Visual Improvement Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1 INITIAL PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT Developing Ideas for the Proposal When developing an idea for a proposal it is important to determine if the idea has been considered in the applicant's locality or State. A careful check should be made with legislators and area government agencies and related public and private agencies which may currently have grant awards or contracts to do similar work. If a similar program already exists, the applicant may need to reconsider submitting the proposed project, particularly if duplication of effort is pemeived. If significant differences or improvements in the proposed project's goals can be clearly established, it may be worthwhile to pursue Federal assistance. Community Support Community support for most proposals is essential. Once proposal summary is developed, look for individuals or groups representing academic, political, professional, and lay organizations which may be willing to support the proposal in writing. The type and caliber of community support is critical in the initial and subsequent review phases. Numerous letters of support can be persuasive to a grantor agency. Do not overlook support from local government agencies and public officials. Letters of endorsement detailing exact areas of project sanction and commitment are often requested as part of a proposal to a Federal agency. Several months may be required to develop letters of endorsement since something of value (e.g., buildings, staff, services) is sometimes negotiated between the parties involved. Many agencies require, in writing, affiliation agreements (a mutual agreement to share services between agencies) and building space commitments prior to either grant approval or award. A useful method of generating community support may be to hold meetings with the top decision makers in the community who would be concerned with the subject matter of the proposal. The forum for discussion may include a query into the merits of the proposal, development of a contract of support for the proposal, to generate data in support of the proposal, or development of a strategy to create proposal support from a large number of community gro,ups. Identification of a Funding Resource A review of the Objectives and Uses and Use Restrictions sections of the Catalog program description can point out which programs might provide funding for an idea. Do not overlook the related programs as potential resources. Both the applicant and the grantor agenCY should 'have the same interests, intentions, and needs if a proposal is to be considered an acceptable candidate for funding. Once a potential grantor agency is identified, call the contact telephone number identified in Information Contacts and ask for a grant application kit. Later, get to know some of the grantor agency personnel. Ask for suggestions, criticisms, and advice about the proposed project. In many cases, the more agency personnel know about the proposal, the better the chance of support and of an eventual favorable decision. Sometimes it is useful to send the proposal summary to a specific agency official in a separate cover letter, and ask Visual Improvement Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 for review and comment at the earliest possible convenience. Always check with the Federal agency to determine its preference if this approach is under consideration. If the review is unfavorable and differences cannot be resolved, ask the examining agency (official) to suggest another department or agency which may be interested in the proposal. A personal visit to the agency's regional office or headquarters is also important. A visit not only establishes face-to-face contact, but also may bring out some essential details about the proposal or help secure literature and references from the agency's library. Federal agencies are required to report funding information as funds are approved, increased or decreased among projects within a given State depending on the type of required reporting. Also, consider reviewing the Federal Budget for the current and budget fiscal years to determine proposed dollar amounts for particular budget functions. The applicant should carefully study the eligibility requirements for each Federal program under consideration (see the Applicant Eligibility section of the Catalog program description). The applicant maY learn that he or she is required to provide services otherwise unintended such as a service to particular client groups, or involvement of specific institutions. It may necessitate the modification of the original concept in order for the project to be eligible for funding. Questions about eligibility should be discussed with the appropriate program officer. Deadlines for submitting applications are often not negotiable. They are usually associated with strict timetables for agency review. Some programs have more than one application deadline during the fiscal year. Applicants should plan proposal development around the established deadlines. Getting Organized to Write the Proposal Throughout the proposal writing stage keep a notebook handy to write down ideas. Periodically, try to connect ideas by reviewing the notebook. Never throw away written ideas during the grant writing stage. Maintain a file labeled "Ideas" or by some other convenient title and review the ideas from time to time. The file should be easily accessible. The gathering of documents such as articles of incorporation, tax exemption certificates, and bylaws should be completed, if possible, before the writing begins. REVIEW . Cdticism - At some point, perhaps after the first or second draft is completed, seek out a neutral third party to review the proposal working draft for continuity, clarity and reasoning. Ask for constructive criticism at this point, rather than wait for the Federal grantor agency to volunteer this information during the review cycle. For example, has the writer made unsupported assu~nptions or used jargon or excessive language in the proposal? Signature - Most proposals are made to institutions rather than individuals. Often signatures of chief administrative officials are required. Check to make sure they are included in the proposal where appropriate. Visual Improvement Plan / City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ~,~ ~ Neatness- Proposals should be typed, collated, copied, and packaged correctly and neatly (according to agency instructions, if any). Each package should be inspected to ensure uniformity from cover to cover. Binding may require either clamps or hard covers. Check with the Federal agency to determine its preference. A neat, organized, and attractive proposal package can leave a positive impression with the reader about the proposal contents. Mailing- A cover letter should always accompany a proposal. Standard U.S. Postal Service requirements apply unless otherwise indicated by the Federal agency. Make sure there is enough time for the proposals to reach their destinations. Otherwise, special arrangements may be necessary. Always coordinate such arrangements with the Federal grantor agency project office (the agency which will ultimately have the responsibility for the project), the grant office (the agency which will coordinate the grant review), and the contract office (the agency responsible for disbursement and grant award notices), if necessary. PART TWO: WRITING THE GRANT PROPOSAL The Basic Components of a Proposal There are eight basic components to creating a solid proposal package: (1) the proposal summary; (2) introduction of organization; (3) the problem statement (or needs assessment); (4) project objectives; (5) project methods or design; (6) project evaluation; (7) future funding; and (8) the project budget. The following will provide an overview of these components. The Proposal Summary: Outline of Project Goals The proposal summary outlines the proposed project and should appear at the beginning of the proposal. It could be in the form of a cover letter or a separate page, but should definitely be brief -- no longer than two or three paragraphs. The summary would be most useful if it were prepared after the proposal has been developed in order to encompass all the key summary points necessary to communicate the objectives of the project. It is this document that becomes the cornerstone of your proposal, and the initial impression it gives will be critical to the success of your venture. In many cases, the summary will be the first part of the proposal package seen by agency officials and very possibly could be the only part of the package that is carefully reviewed before the decision is made to consider the project any further. The applicant must select a fundable project which can be supported in view of the local need. Alternatives, in the absence of Federal support, should be pointed out. The influence of the project both during and after the project period should be explained. The consequences of tJ3e project as a result of funding should be highlighted. Introduction: Presenting a Credible Applicant or Organization The applicant should gather data about its organization from all available sources. Most proposals require a description of an applicant's organization to describe its past and present operations. Some features to consider are: · A brief biography of board members and key staff members. Visual Improvement Plan Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 · The organization's goals, philosophy, track record with other grantors, and any success stories. · The data should be relevant to the goals of the Federal grantor agency and should establish the applicant's credibility. The Problem Statement: Stating the Purpose at Hand The problem statement (or needs assessment) is a key element of a proposal that makes a clear, concise, and well-supported statement of the problem to be addressed. The best way to collect information about the problem is to conduct and document both a formal and informal needs assessment for a program in the target or service area. The information provided should be both factual and directly related to the problem addressed by the proposal. Areas to document are: · The purpose for developing the proposal. · The beneficiaries -- who are they and how will they benefit. · The social and economic costs to be affected. · The nature of the problem (provide as much hard evidence as possible). · How the applicant organization came to realize the problem exists, and what is currently being done about the problem. · The remaining alternatives available when funding has been exhausted. Explain what will happen to the project and the impending implications. · Most importantly, the specific manner through which problems might be solved. Review the resources needed, considering how they will be used and~ to what end. There is a considerable body of literature on the exact assessment techniques to be used. Any local, regional, or State government planning office, or local university offering course work in planning and evaluation techniques should be able to provide excellent background references. Types of data that may be collected include: historical, geographic, quantitative, factual, statistical, and philosophical information, as well as studies completed by colleges, and literature seamhes from public or university libraries. Local colleges or universities which have a department or section related to the proposal topic may help determine if there is interest in developing a student or faculty project to conduct a needs assessment. It may be helpful to include examples of the findings for highlighting in the proposal. Project Objectives: Goals and Desired Outcome Program objectives refer to specific activities in a proposal. It is necessary to identify all objectives related to the goals to be reached, and the methods to be employed to achieve the stated objectives. Consider quantities or things measurable and refer to a problem statement and the outcome of proposed activities when developing a well-stated objective. The figures used should be verifiable. Remember, if the proposal is funded, the stated objectives will probably be used to evaluate program progress, so be realistic. There is literature available to help identify and write program objectives. Visual Improvement Plan C:,itv of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 j ~ Program Methods and Program Design: A Plan of Action The program design refers to how the project is expected to work and solve the stated problem. Sketch out the following: · The activities to occur along with the related resources and staff needed to operate the project (inputs). · A flow chart of the organizational features of the project. Describe how the parts interrelate, where personnel will be needed, and what they are expected to do. Identify the kinds of facilities, transportation, and support services required (throughputs). · Explain what will be achieved through 1 and 2 above (outputs); i.e., plan for measurable results. Project staff may be required to produce evidence of program performance through an examination of stated objectives during either a site visit by the Federal grantor agency and or grant reviews which may involve peer review committees. · It may be useful to devise a diagram of the program design. For example, draw a three column block. Each column is headed by one of the parts (inputs, throughputs and outputs), and on the left (next to the first column) specific program features should be identified (i.e., implementation, staffing, procurement, and systems development). In the grid, specify something about the program design, for example, assume the first column is labeled inputs and the first row is labeled staff. On the grid one might specify under inputs five nurses to operate a child care unit. The throughput might be to maintain charts, counsel the children, and set up a daily routine; outputs might be to discharge 25 healthy children per week. This type of procedure will help to conceptualize both the scope and detail of the project. · Wherever possible, justify in the narrative the course of action taken. The most economical method should be used that does not compromise or sacrifice project quality. The financial expenses associated with performance of the project will .later become points of negotiation with the Federal program staff. If everything fie not carefully justified in writing in the proposal, after negotiation with the Federal grantor agencies, the approved project may resemble less of the original concept. Carefully consider the pressures of the proposed implementation, that is, the time and money needed to acquire each part of the plan. A Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) chart~could be useful and supportive in justifying some proposals. · Highlight the innovative features of the proposal which could be considered distinct from other proposals under consideration. · Whenever possible, use appendices to provide details, supplementary data, references, and information requiring in-depth analysis. These types of data, although supportive of the proposal, if included in the body of the design, could detract from its readability. Appendices provide the proposal reader Visual Improvement Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page6 ~? with immediate access to details if and when clarification of an idea, sequence or conclusion is required. Time tables, work plans, schedules, activities, methodologies, legal papers, personal vitae, letters of support, and endorsements are examples of appendices. Evaluation: Product and Process Analysis The evaluation component is two-fold: (1) product evaluation; and (2) process evaluation. Product evaluation addresses results that can be attributed to the project, as well as the extent to which the project has satisfied its desired objectives. Process evaluation addresses how the project was conducted, in terms of consistency with the stated plan of action and the effectiveness of the various activities within the plan. Many agencies now require some form of program evaluation among grantees. The requirements of the proposed project should be explored carefully. Evaluations may be conducted by an internal staff member, an evaluation firm or both. The applicant should state the amount of time needed to evaluate, how the feedback will be distributed among the proposed staff, and a schedule for review and comment for this type of communication. Evaluation designs may start at the beginning, middle or end of a project, but the applicant should specify a start-up time. It is practical to submit an evaluation design at the start of a project for two reasons: · Convincing evaluations require the collection of appropriate data before and during program operations; and, · If the evaluation design cannot be prepared at the outset then a critical review of the program design may be advisable. · Even if the evaluation design has to be revised as the project progresses, it is much easier and cheaper to modify a good design. If the problem is not well defined and carefully analyzed for cause and effect relationships then a good evaluation design may be difficult to achieve. Sometimes a pilot study is needed to begin the identification of facts and relationships. Often a thorough literature search may be sufficient. Evaluation requires both coordidation and agreement among program decision makers (if known). Above all, the Federal grantor agency's requirements should be highlighted in the evaluation design. Also, Federal grantor agencies may require specific evaluation techniques such as designated data formats (an existing information collection system) or they may offer financial inducements for voluntary participation in a national evaluation study. The applicant should ask specifically about these points. Also, consult the Criteria For Selecting PropOsals section of the Catalog program description to determine the exact evaluation methods to be required for the program if funded. ' Future Funding: Long-Term Project Planning Describe a plan for continuation beyond the grant Period, and/or the availability of other resources necessary to implement the grant. Discuss maintenance and future program funding if program is for construction activity. Account for other needed expenditures if program includes purchase of equipment. Visual Improvement Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Page 7 The Proposal Budget: Planning the Budget Funding levels in assistance programs change yearly. It is useful to review the appropriations over the past several years to try to project future funding levels. However, it is safer to never anticipate that the income from the grant will be the sole support for the project. This consideration should be given to the overall budget requirements, and in particular, to budget line items most subject to inflationary pressures. Restraint is important in determining inflationary cost projections (avoid padding budget line items), but attempt to anticipate possible future increases. Some vulnerable budget areas are: utilities, rental of buildings and equipment, salary increases, food, telephones, insurance, and transportation. Budget adjustments are sometimes made after the grant award, but this can be a lengthy process. Be certain that implementation, continuation and phase-down costs can be met. Consider costs associated with leases, evaluation systems, hard/soft match requirements, audits, development, implementation and maintenance of information and accounting systems, and other long-term financial commitments. A well-prepared budget justifies all eXPenses and is consistent with the proposal narrative. Some areas in need of an evaluation for consistency are: (1) the salaries in the proposal in relation to those of the applicant organization should be similar; (2) if new staff persons are being hired, additional space and equipment should be considered, as necessary; (3) if the budget calls for an equipment purchase, it should be the type allowed by the grantor agency; (4) if additional space is rented, the increase in insurance should be supported; (5) if an indirect cost rate applies to the proposal, the division between direct and indirect costs should not be in conflict, and the aggregate budget totals should refer directly to the approved formula; and (6) if matching costs are required, the contributions to the matching fund should be taken out of the budget unless otherwise specified in the application instructions. It is very important to become familiar with Government-wide circular requirements. The Catalog identifies in the program description section (as information is provided from the agencies) the particular circulars applicable to a Federal program, and summarizes coordination of Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Programs" requirements in Appendix I. The applicant should thoroughly review the appropriate circulars since they are essential in determining items such as cost principles and conforming with Government guidelines for Federal domestic assistance. Visual Improvement Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 01-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting with respect to the above referenced Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan and concluded said meeting on that date. 2. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ara true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- raferenced meeting on December 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. On September 16, 1997, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by Resolution No. 87-505. Subsequently on July 7, 1999, the City Council incorporated the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan into the Development Code as the Foothill Districts by Ordinance No. 604. b. The Implementing Strategies of the Foothill Districts call for establishing program(s) that upgrade infrastructura, use design traatment as a positive force for economic development, and create color coordination involving sign hardware, street furniture, poles, and related elements within the public right-of-way. The Implementing Strategies are to be enacted by "separate acts." c. In March of 2000, a Design Consultant was selected, with the approval of the Redevelopment Agency, to prepare a Design Specification Plan for Foothill Boulevard to achieve the above-mentioned implementing strategies. Based on community input through the Chamber of Commerce, the Design Specification Plan was named the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan d. The Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan will expand the streetscape design of the Foothill Districts by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. e. The Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan will not have a significant impact on the environment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-111 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 12, 2001 Page 2 3. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DaY OF DECEMBER 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: ~ JBrad B~c~etar~{,~/ I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HACZAS, HANNER[NO, t4CNZEL, STEI4ART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting with respect to the above referenced Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan and concluded said meeting on that date. 2. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public meeting and concluded said meeting prior to adoption of this Resolution. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced meeting on January 16, 2002, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. On September 16, 1997, the City Council adopted the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by Resolution No. 87-505. Subsequently on July 7, 1999, the City Council incorporated the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan into the Development Code as the Foothill Districts by Ordinance No. 604. b. The Implementing Strategies of the Foothill Districts call for establishing program(s) that upgrade infrastructure, use design treatment as a positive force for economic development, and create color coordination involving sign hardware, street furniture, poles, and related elements within the public right-of-way. The Implementing Strategies are to be enacted by "separate acts." c. In March of 2000, a Design Consultant was selected, with the approval of the Redevelopment Agency, to prepare a Design Specification Plan for Foothill Boulevard to achieve the above-mentioned implementing strategies. Based on community input through the Chamber of Commerce, the Design Specification Plan was named the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan d. The Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan will expand the streetscape design of the Foothill Districts by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 e. The Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan by the adoption of the attached Resolutino and is subject to the following condition: a. The Planning Commission shall review the changes to the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Minor changes may be reviewed by the City Planner and the City Engineer. 5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI"IONGA IlISTOBIC OOLITE ifisnBl lmprovement PlBg '~- OfliCiBIlY OedicBted'Boute 66 in 1926 · The I"lot. h~ Ro~d OfliCiBIlY DedicBted Boute 66 ill 1926 · The Hother Road · America's Main Street Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga is Boute 66 , ~ 2 The VisuBl Improvement Program will celebrate the llistor~ of Bonte 68 Whnt will the WsuBI Impravement · Program doP · Set ~uld~in~ for S~ee~e ImDmv~ 3 ighB! will the ItisuBI Improvemenf Program doP · · Set ~uldelln~s for Strtctscapt Draw upon e. xbtln~ improv~.m~'d: Bevelop e Ilnlque 8nd Ilnilying Theme · Street Furniture ~ . ;~ · Enhanc~ Paving Develop8 Ilnigue 8nd llnifying Theme · Street Furniture · Enhanced Paving Route 66 Art Features · TllEPIAN Project Areo Afop 6' ~ AWe length of Foothill ·. West Entry at Grove Avenue 7 6~tewBy ~ntr~ Afongments ' Typical ,~ctivit~ ~,enter ~,orner ' ~e ~on~e Bandin8 Ac~nt Color~ ~ncr~ Sidewalk with Double R~ °f Brick Bandingand T~ in Tr~ Gmt~ ~ Plac~ Route 66 Icons ~ all 4 ~me~' ~ '" 9 SubUrbBn PJrawJy EnlJJncement I~ej .. ~ ]0 Furniture Polctte I~lWor~ Icons ]! Ilrtwodz lcons 12 THE CITY OF i~AN C I1 0 CUCA~IONGA Staff Repol , DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRCDCA01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request to amend various sections of the Foothill and Industrial Districts by adding or modifying text and graphics regarding the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Community Plan. CONSIDERATION OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-O3- CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Community Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the three amendments through the adoption of the attached Ordinances. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND: in August and September of 2001, the Foothill Boulevard and Economic Development Task Force (Mayor Pre Tem Williams, Councilman Biane, Chairman McNiel, and Commissioner Stewart) reviewed and accepted the design concept for the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The Task Force directed staff to forward the design concept for Planning Commission and City Council approval. On October 24, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed and supported the approval of the Visual Improvement Plan. The Commission also directed staff to proceed with amending the Development Code and Victoria and Terra Vista Community Plans in order to reference the Visual Improvement Plan. The Planning Commission directed staff that the Visual Improvement Plan and the above three amendments should be forwarded for City Council consideration at the same time since they are related. On December 12, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment as outline in the attached Planning Commission staff CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRCDCA01-02, DRCTVCPA01-01,AND DRCVCPA01-03 Janua~ 16,2002 Page 2 report as shown in Exhibit "A." After conducting a public hearing and having no testimony from the public, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the code amendments to the City Council. Attached for City Council review is the staff report and minutes of the December 12, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. CORRESPONDENCE: The three items were advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet City Planner BB:NF/jc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated December 12, 2001 Exhibit"B"-Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 01-108, 109, and 110 for DRCDCA 01-02, DRCTVCPA 01-01, and DRCVCPA 01-03 respectively Proposed Ordinances for DRCDCA01-02, DRCTVCPA 01-01, and DRCVCPA 01-03 TH E C I T Y OF I~ANCH 0 C U CAM 0 N GA SlaffReport DATE: December 12, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRCDCA01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various sections of the Foothill and Industrial Districts by adding or modifying text and graphics regarding the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Community Plan. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Community Plan. BACKGROUND: On October 24, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed and supported the approval of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Attached for Commission reference is a copy of the October 24, 2001, staff report and minutes. At the meeting, the Commission also directed staff to proceed with amending several planning documents such as the Development Code and Victoria and Terra Vista Community Plans in order to reference the Visual Improvement Plan. The purpose of amending the documents is for members of the development community and design professionals to be aware of the design concept and specifications and the need to obtain the Visual Improvement Plan for preparation of their development plans. ANALYSIS: This section of the report will summarize the proposed text and graphic changes to the documents listed below for ease of referencing, the new text are shown in bold in the attached Exhibits. A. Development Code: 1. Foothill Boulevard District: The proposed changes affect Section 17.32.050 of the General Design Guidelines as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDCA01-02, DRCTVCPA01-01, DRCTVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RC December 12, 201 Page 2 a. Modify the Community Design Vocabulary section by adding the Activity Centers at Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Rochester Avenue, and Day Creek Boulevard. These streets are already designated as Activity Centers under the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement adopted for the Industrial Districts, and the Terra Vista and Victoda Planned Communities in 1991. Also, add text to reference that the specific design of each Activity Center is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The proposed text changes are as shown in Exhibit "A-I" of the attached Ordinance. The Activity Center at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road did not receive a specific design in the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. This Activity Center contains the Sycamore Inn that is a Historic Landmark with opportunity for future development at the east side of the site and new or redevelopment for the Red Chief Motel at the west side of the site. Recognizing the unique opportunities, the Foothill Boulevard Plan established a rural, informal, village concept for the Activity Center. This concept is different from the urban streetscape concept stated in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the design in the Visual Improvement Plan. Staff believes that because of the site uniqueness, and not knowing the ultimate uses and improvements surrounding the site, imposing a specific design for the Activity Center may not be the best approach at this time. This Activity Center should continue to be treated differently and a specific design can be developed at the time of a project proposal at or near this Activity Center. b. Modify Suburban Parkway Transitions Section by adding text that references the specific design of the suburban parkway transition and the enhancement areas that are within the Foothill Boulevard/Route Visual Improvement Plan. The text changes include a brief description of the special treatments with accent pavement on travel lanes, sidewalk and median-islands, accent trees, placement of street furniture and an'work, and Route 66 icons. The proposed text changes are as shown in Exhibits "A-1" and "A-2" of the attached Ordinance. c. Modify the Gateways Section by adding text referencing the specific design of the Gateways within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan as shown in Exhibit "A-3" of the attached Ordinance. d. Modify Foothill Boulevard/Archibald Avenue Intersection Section by adding reference that the specific design of the intersection is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan as shown in Exhibit "A-4" of the attached Ordinance. e. Modify the Activity Center Concept as shown in Exhibit "A-5" of the attached Ordinance by adding text to the streetscape and capital improvement needs referencing the design specifications within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDCA01-02, DRCTVCPA01-01, DRCTVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RC December 12, 201 Page 3 f. Modify the graphics of the Activity Centedlntersection concept to be consistent with the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan and as shown in Exhibit "A-6" of the attached Ordinance. g. Modify the Activity Center graphic by striking out "shall be determined." The Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan established the design specifications for the street furniture. h. Replace the Suburban Parkway graphics and add text to the Parkway Transition consistent with the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan, and as shown in Exhibit "A-7" and "A-8" of the attached Ordinance. i. Modify Streetscape Design Details by referencing that streetscape furniture existing and color coordination shall be per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement and as shown in Exhibit "A-9" and "A-10" of the attached Ordinance. j. Modify the Activity Centers and Suburban Parkway Sections of the Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines, 17.32.070A and B, by adding text referencing the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan as shown in the Exhibit "A-11" to "A-14" of the attached Ordinance. 2. Industrial Districts: Modify the Special Boulevard Section 17.30.060 E3a by adding text referencing that development shall comply with "Section 17.32.060 Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines and Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan" and as shown in Exhibit "A-15" of the attached Ordinance. B. Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans: In October of 1991, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 457 and 458 amending the two Community Plans by establishing streetscape and site design standards consistent with Foothill Boulevard District, which is known as the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. The proposed modifications are to add text referencing the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan and to replace the graphics for the Activity Center, the Suburban Parkway and the Parkway Transitions consistent with the Visual Improvement Plan, and as shown in Exhibit "A" of the attached Ordinance. C. Environmental Review: The proposed amendments to Development Code, Terra Vista, and Victoria Community Plans, which involve text and graphics changes are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061. CORRESPONDENCE: The three items were advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDCA01-02, DRCTVCPA01-01, DRCTVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RC December 12, 201 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward recommendation of approval for the DRCDCA01-02, DRCTVCPA01-01, DRCTVCPA01-03 to the City Council. Respectfully submitted; Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated October 24, 2001 Resolution Recommending Approval of DRCDCA 01-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of DRCTVCPA 01-01 Resolution Recommending Approval of DRCVCPA 01-03 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: October 24, 2001 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRO~t Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A review of the design concept for the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan, forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council, and direct staff to initiate appropriate amendments to the Development Code, Victoda Community Plan, and Terra Vista Community Plan. BACKGROUND: In June 2001, staff introduced to the Commission the draft design concept of the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Imprevement Plan. The design concept was well received by the Commission at the meeting. Attached is a copy of the staff report and minutes, see Exhibit "A." The design consultant has been refining the concept plan based on the comments from the Commission and the Foothill Boulevard and Economic Development Task Force (Council Members Williams and Biane; Commissioners Stewart and McNiel). In August and September 2001, the Task Force reviewed the final design concept and directed staff to forward it for Planning Commission review and City Council approval. ANALYSIS: This section of the report will bdefly describe the intent of the Visual Improvement Plan and its design concept. Representatives from the City's design consultant, Urban Design Studio/RBF, will be presenting a presentation of the design concept at the meeting. A. Implementation of Foothill District: A significant portion of the Foothill Boulevard Distdct in the Development Code is directed to the visual improvement of Foothill Boulevard/Route 66. Specifically, infrastructure upgrading involving special gateway design and color coordination involving hardware, street fumiture, poles and related objects within the public right--of-way are strategies mentioned in the Implementation Section of the Foothill Boulevard District. The Visual Improvement Plan will meet the intent of the mentioned strategies because the design concept will visually enhance the boulevard with street furniture and elements that unify the streetscape, promote cohesiveness, and preserve Historic Route 66. 322 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VIP October 24, 2001 Page 2 B. Visual Improvement Plan Concept: The Visual Improvement Plan shows the specific design for the two gateways at Grove and East Avenues and the eight activity centers. Each intersection is uniquely designed to promote cohesiveness in all four comers. It also shows the parkway transition design and the use of the Route 66 icon "embossed" on the asphalt pavement. The Visual Improvement Plan includes a collection of approved street elements such as a bus shelter, trash receptacles, benches, color and design of the poles, etc. and a palette of Route 66 icons. The intent of the Visual improvement Plan is to include enough details and specifications so that a designer can use it in preparing construction plans C. The next step: As the Visual Improvement Plan is close to completion, several planning documents, specifically the Development Code, Victoria Community Plan, and Terra Vista Community Plan need to be amended to add language that references the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. The purpose is for members of the development community and design professionals to be aware of the design concept and obtain the Visual Improvement Plan for the preparation of their development plans. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a. recommendation of approval of the Visual Improvement Plan to the City Council and direct staff to initiate Development Code, Victoda Community Plan, and Term Vista Community Plan amendments to reference the Visual Improvement Plan in those documents. The recommendation of approval of the Visual Improvement Plan should be forwarded to the City Council concurrently with the recommendation of approval for the amendments in the vadous Planning documents. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB.'NF:mlg Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated June 27, 2001 22.3 PUBLIC HEARINGS ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2001-00705 - GOOD FELLAS BAR AND NIGHT CLUB - A uest to include disc jockey, dancing, and live acoustic music in conjunction with an existing ~nd night club within a leased space of 2,000 square feet in the Virginia Dare Business the General Commercial District, located at 8034 Haven Avenue, Suite B - APN: Ruben Warren, r~ing Technician, presented the staff report. Commissioner ,~ if the application was being processed because of the change in ownership and if the a was providing the same entertainment as the previous owner. Mr. Warren confirmed that ~ ~rrect. Chairman McNiel opened the ~ring. Robert Lang, owner, Good Fellas Nightclub, 8034 Haven Avenue, Suite B, Rancho Cucamonga, agreed with the conditions. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel public hearing. Commissioner Mannedno felt it is a nice place. Commissioner Tolstoy believed it is a good merit. Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart, to the resolution approving Entertainment Permit DRC2001-00705. Motion carded by the AYES: MAClAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried · '~ C. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRCDCA01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- ,~ A request to amend various sections of the Foothill and Industrial Districts by adding or modifying text and graphics regarding the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Related files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01 and Victoda Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03. D. TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista Community Plan. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03. E. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Community Plan. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01. Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 12, 2001 DIRECTOR'S REPORTS F. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A request to review and approve the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01, and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public headng; however, there was no testimony and he closed the hearing. Commissioner Tolstoy wished someone would provide the money to implement the plan. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Mannerino, to adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC'rVCPA01-01, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03. and the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded G. APPEAL OF INCOMPLETENE ~MENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16279 - COLORADO PACIFIC residential subdivision of 80 single-family lots on 57 acres in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the south side Highland Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues - APN: 227-051-01, 04, 0! and 28 and 227-061-05. Debra Meier, Contract Planner, presented the staff report and indicate, received a letter from Dona Smerek favoring an equestrian design for the project and that consideration be given to extending sound or garden walls to include the area the three single story homes east of the project. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Danny Brose, Colorado Pacific Communiti Via Mirador, San Juan Capistrano, stated the project has been in process for severa had gone through several renditions of various plans. He said they had narrowed project to something they believe is within the current designation of the Etiwanda S He indicated they met with staff 8 to 10 months ago and felt there was an interpre the property is out of the equestrian area. He stated they submitted a plan e then told they have to meet equestrian completeness items. He believed the p~ is not within the Equestrian Overlay District as outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. that the Plan states that the Equestrian Overlay District applies to all residential p~ Route 30 and to residential properties abutting a Community Equestria He noted that the equestrian trail goes behind homes on the west side of Etiwanda Aven his property is east of Etiwanda Avenue. He said his property is not contiguous to or al uestrian trail but is 660 feet away from the closest equestrian trail. He felt that the .pecific Plan would have to be amended to accommodate staffs interpretation that the should continue from the corner of Highland and Etiwanda Avenues. He also objected to being asked to abide by the new standards that require a 200-foot depth for equestrian lots. He felt their project was being held up on what is a de facto moratorium. Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 12, 2001 RESOLUTION NO. 01-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRCDCA01-02, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS BY ADDING OR MODIFYING TEXT AND GRAPHICS REGARDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within the City. b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Histodc Route 66. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-108 DRCDCA01-02 - CITY OF P, ANCHO CUCAMONGA December 12, 2001 Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that them is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pumuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02 by the adoption of the attached City council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ~Larry ~[;~lc~liel, Chairman ATTEST: I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 01-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01*01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within the Terra Vista Community Plan. b. On September 19, 1991, the Terra Vista community Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 457 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard District. c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-109 DRCI~/CPA01-01 - CITY OF P, ANCHO CUCAMONGA December 12, 2001 Page 2 b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CE(;~ Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Term Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC'I'VCPA01-02 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2001. PLANNING CO,,,~IMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ,,~..arry T~Y'/,~c'Niel, Chairman AT'I'EST: ~ .. JBrad B~ecretary,.~/' I,'l~md Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 01-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-03, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within the Victoria Community Plan. b. On September 19, 1991, the Victoria Community Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 458 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard District. c. The application will expound the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-110 DRCVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 12, 2001 Page 2 b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Victoda Community Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Victoda Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, DRCVCPA01-03 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY DECEMBER OF 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "~- '[.arty T(~oNiel, Chairman ATTEST: I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. ~;~75 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT, DRCDCA01-02, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS BY ADDING OR MODIFYING TEXT AND GRAPHICS REGARDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on January 16, 2002, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within the City. b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promote cohesiveness and preserve Historic Route 66. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRCDCA01-02- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 16, 2002 Page 2 a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specificallyflnds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-02 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Rancho Cucamon~a Development Code Section 17.32. 050 A clear organization of streets, identifiable districts, and landmarks which gives people a sense of direction and orientation. The extent of confusion in traffic circulation, and the amount of congestion increasingly figures in people's pemeptions of cities. 3. A sense of uniqueness. This quality can be derived from a single feature, a district-wide theme reflecting ethnic or historical themes, or an event which is staged in a special place each year. 4. A sense of place in a shared past which gives people a sense of belonging. B. Community Design Vocabulary. In an effort to provide a unique community image for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing or proposed image enhancement elements will be provided or enhanced and designed to increase corridor identity. Vocabulary of these image giving elements include the following: 1. Activity Centers. Activity Centers are points of intersection at major streets or landmarks along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. As such, they are points of concentrated activity which give identity to individual subareas. Major Activity Centers located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include the areas surrounding the following intersections: a. Foothill Boulevard at San Bemardino Road b. Foothill Boulevard at Vineyard Avenue c. Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue d. Foothill Boulevard at Hermosa Avenue "e. Foothill Boulevard at ' . aven Avenue f, Foothill Boulevard at Milliken Avenue g. Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue h. Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard . i. Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue Bea~var4-Ggr~ The Activity Center at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road is a more rural, informal, village design concept. The specific design of the intersections for the Activity Centers between Vineyard and Etiwanda Avenues is J~ within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. 2. Suburban Parkway Transitions. It is recognized that the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will not become a totally pedestrian-oriented environment. Therefore, the five pedestrian-oriented activity centers listed above, will be linked together by "suburban parkway" transition areas. These parkway transition sections will consist of informal landscape treatments dominated by drifts of London Planes, Califomia Sycamore, and Purple Plum trees. Other parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms and meandering/undulating sidewalks which are designed to complement informal landscape treatments. The parkway transitions will include enhancement areas that have DRCDCA 01-02 17.32-18 2/01 EXHIBIT "Al' Rancho Cucamons a Development Code Section 17.32.050 special treatments with accent pavement in the travel lanes, median island, and-] sidewalks; street furniture, and accent trees. The specific design of the parkway transitions and enhancement areas is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 VisualI Improvement Plan. 3. Landmarks Specific elements of the environment that exhibit and promote an individual or unique identity include landmarks. Because landmarks are, by definition, unique and distinct, they are also few in number. Landmarks are typically associated with historic structures/features or prominent land forms which exhibit memorable qualities and project a strong identity or image. Landmarks located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include: a. The Sycamore Inn b. The Oso Bear Monument c. The remnants of the Cucamonga China Town d. The Thomas Brothers Winery e. The Virginia Dare Winery f. The first U.S. Post Office site in Cucamonga g. John and George Klusman Houses h. Mitchell House i. Mandala House j. Bell House k. Guidera House I. Sacred Heart Church m. Aggazzotti Winery n. Sections of San Bernardino Road located east of the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge and north of Foothill Boulevard 17.32-19 2/01 DRCDCA 01-02 Rancho Cucamon$a Development Code Section 17.32.050 4. Gateways. Gateway elements are typically associated with prominent landforms, landscape features, structures, or entrance monumentation signs designed to announce entrance into a community or special districts. Currently, these gateway features are nonexistent within the planning area, which contribute to an overall lack of corridor definition or identity. Gateways are proposed for the intersections of Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue. The specific design of'[ the two gateways is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual ImprovementJ Plan. 5. Views. View opportunities are found within every subarea and range from expansive vistas of distant mountains, to tightly framed views of landmarks, prominent natural landforms, or other special features located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard. The critical ENTRY PORTAL INCLUDE SPECIAL HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAP£ REQUIREMENTS"-~. ~ · IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS WELL AS PRIVATE PROPERTY AS DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT ]' Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 ~l~'.v LVisual Improvement Plan requirement is that view opportunities be recognized and enhanced and that all proposed developments be designed to preserve and protect the desired view. C. Key Existinq Community Features. In an effort to promote community design within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing community design features have been identified. It is the intent of the community design plan to identify these elements so that they may be preserved or enhanced. The following key community features are significant structures and are worthy of preservation/restoration and should be incorporated into any future development proposals for their respective sites. Key community design features related to the Foothill Boulevard are described below. 1. Thomas Brothers and Vir.qinia Dare Wineries. These wineries are one of the major theme-setting community character elements for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. All streetscape/landscape and architectural components shall be sensitive to and compatible with the overall winery theme of Rancho Cucamonga. Key visual elements, such as grape arbors and trellis elements, shall be consistently repeated along the corridor. Architectural variations which fully reflect the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga shall be encouraged. The Thomas Brothers Winery, first established in 1839, is among the oldest in the state. The building reflects early California/Spanish architectural influences, characterized by DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "A3" 17.32-20 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 050 · ...... : - - ,. , · ; ~ ' , Th* ,p~ifi* d~ifln ~or thi* inter,~tion i~ within th~ Foothill Boul,~ard/Rout~ 8~ ~ Visual Improvement ~lan. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - ARCHIBALD AVENUE INTERSECTION 3. Sycamore Inn. The Sycamore Inn Activity Center is dominated by a quality sit-down restaurant and complemented by a small specialty-oriented restaurant and the original Red Chief Motel. Originally established in the 1880s this large, two-story structure was constructed as an inn/stage stop in the community known as Bear Gulch. The architecture is characterized by chateau and craftsman details. The building is sheathed in vertical wood siding and has a moderately pitched gable roof with a native stone chimney. The building and site are enhanced by the presence of numerous mature California Sycamore trees. 4. MaRic Lamp Restaurant. The Magic Lamp Restaurant is located in an eclectic building which is characterized by brick walls and a unique clay-tiled hip roof. The roof of the structure is composed of a variety of roof tiles stacked in such a fashion as to provide a rich, textured effect. The restaurant lies within the Bear Gulch Activity Area. 5. Eucalyptus Windrows. The remnants of a windrow are found on either side of Foothill Boulevard, east of the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge crossing which traverses Foothill Boulevard. The trees are mature and appear healthy; although they are not maintained and set a distinctive open space character along Foothill Boulevard. 6. Notable Structures. The following community features are notable structures and, at the property owners option, can be incorporated into a future development proposal. Any such proposal must be required to upgrade these structures to current City Development Standards (i.e., building and safety, land use circulation/access, and landscaping) or may be relocated off-site. a. Old Route 66 Gas Station (9670). This former gas station, located near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, is comprised of two separate buildings which include an office, gas pump canopy, and a separate DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "A4" 17.32-22 2/01 Rancho Cucamon~,a Develo, oment Code Section 17.32. 050 A. URBAN FORM Single story structure at sidewatk edge with two, possibly 3 story structures bshind. At major intersectioP=, buglings should be sidewalk a~acent, ~ awnings of sffuctuml overhangs for solar reliof for pedestrians. Buildings not wi~n intemec~ons zones. a. HISTORICAL/ARCHI~C~JRAL BUILDING PO'ITcNT]AL General lad[ of a strong architectural 'theme.' Potanaal based upon historic nature of Foothill Blvd. Wina~ at Vinayard may aW some 'ranch e~ements' to a~chitoctura Such as grape arbo~ (x fiont porches. Older gas stations along Foothill built du~ng Ihe '40'a & '50's also contain spedal architoctura; e!eme~to and material C. DESIGN THEME POTENTIAL A spec~ic design theme is considernd a weak idea and a conjurad rheme is ales a poor idna. An overall snale, form, and matmiais palette is considered most approp~ato. ' O. ClRCULATION NEEDS Foothilll Blvd. is not a pedestrian co~:ourae; it is a vehicular c~fid~. 'l~e ufean design altema~ves should consider cma~ng ped~an nodes at designated local. Paddng should be hidden at these designated inteme~. Consider a conider-tong b~keway. E. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS Capital ~ vmuld include major emp~asla at · · designated iotemed~ons. Elamants might include traffic ~m'~ot urban element (fountain. scull, or alales of flags/beonors). Per Foothilt Boulevard/Route 66 I /~l~)~)~ ~-7 F. Stro~t Iumitum and o~or elemont$ per Foothill Boulovard/Routo S~ /,\ ¥isual Improuom~nt ~lan. Io~a~or~. R. I~IERIN.8/B~ID COLORS H*a~ ~m~ on t~t~md matedala ~ m~ ~ and mol colora. ,~,voidanco ofla~ ~n~ of glaes or orh*rmfl~mat~al~. U~of~alzo. For nm~or I. ¥^¢~qT incmpomte seJectod urban design concept into Meandering sidewalks should connect with access areas at commerclaJ pocode~ (plazas, ~eating, atc,) ' ACTIVITY CENTER CONCEPT Specific design for each Activity Center per Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Improvement Plan.._J DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "A5" 17.32-26 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Formal Street ' Tree Planting Street A~ss to Two Sto~ Building Fountain Element EntiCed Cross~ ...... 'Walk Paving ~0~ Colonnade Entry Formal , Foundation Planting ACTIVITY CENTER/INTERSECTION CONCEPT Specific design for each Activity Center per Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan_.[.--t' DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "A6" 17.32-27 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 050 Decorative light fixtures. Focal theme clock Tower/clock, to be Located out of the Trash receptacles. Accent potted plant Material 36"x 30" Planter size 5'x5' - e.. .9. Bench seating. Urban tree bosk. 30" box · Min. 12'0"min. Vertical De¢o~ Clearance to be maintained. ' · 4. Suburban Parkways. Suburban parkways will be designed to link individual activity centers. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees and rolling turf berms, which evoke pastoral, suburban-oriented, qualities. ,~,~.,c,~,..~,~,,.g~u, DRGDGA 01-02 EXHIBIT 17.32-28 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 050 5. Parkway Transitions. In order to provide a gradual transition from urban-oriented parkways, "parkway transitions" have been introduced within the plan. Parkway transitions are designed to transition formal hardscape elements found within the urban activity zone into informal landscape statements which incorporate rolling turf berms, meandering/undulating sidewalks; and informal tree plantings. Specifically, the parkway transition is characterized by a 75-foot transition zone, dominated by Flowering Plum accent trees. See sketch below for concept. See Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visualm improvement Plan for Specifications. _j.. 6. Circulation System Concepts, a. Center Median Islands. In order to preserve the level of service on Foothill Boulevard, access to commercial properties should be via the median breaks at signalized intersections, with off-street, internal circulation to be provided to serve the properties between intersections. It will also be necessary to accept an increased number of U-turns at the remaining intersections to reduce the greater friction caused by more frequent median openings. Any median break on a street with such high volume must be signalized for safety; and when signals are placed less than approximately 700 feet apart, the speed at which progressive traffic movement can be obtained falls below an acceptable level. East-west arterials in the City will have to be capable of two-way, progressive traffic service for a large part of the day. For these reasons, no median break has been planned, for example, at Red Hill Country Club Drive, San Diego Avenue, or Klusman Avenue. Klusman Avenue is DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT 'A8" 17.32-28 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 h. The Pedestrian Experience. Architecture and outdoor space along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diverse, stimulating, and include activities that create a sense of variety and excitement. (1) Site buildings to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard, This is accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on Foothill Boulevard. (2) Site and design buildings to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and service areas which inter[ere with the flow of Foothill Boulevard pedestrian movements. (3) Site and design structures to facilitate public access across sites where important pedestrian connections occur. Mid-block passageways from rear parking lots can be created through a fully developed internal pasco system. 11. Streetscape Desiqn Details. a. Streetscape Furniture. This streetscape furniture/material palette depicts the elements to utilize along Foothill Boulevard. All furniture that is connected to the sidewalk shall be connected with shear bolts and not have concrete or other footings. This matrix applies to all of Foothill Boulevard. ~ furniture selections are within the Foothill Boulevard IRoutelMl~/~/ The specific 66 Visual Improvement Plan. for f"t"r~ d!r,~ct!cn ch!:,'. !t '.: .".ct '.nt-~.".d,~d tc be ? Median Parking Lot Urban Node Bench ' Parking Bench Lighting Lighting Lighting Lighting Drinking Trash Bollard Tree Grate Bollard Trash Fountain Receptical Receptical ,,.~ ~i-~ ~ ~, ,~, ~:~ I, consistent I'with the 'architecture [palette Planter Enriched Paving Broom Finish Primary Entry Sign Planter Concrete DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "Ag' 17.32-48 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32. 050 -17.32. 070 STREETSCAPE FURNITURE/MATERIAL PALETTE b. Streetscape Liqhtinq. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during daylight hours and evenings. Lighting can have a dramatic affect on the quality of streetscape design. All lighting fixtures, luminaries, poles, and supporting hardware in the publi right-of-way shall be consistent and approved by the City Engineer per the Foothi Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. fo ........ ~ ...................... ~ ~ ~ ~'---~-- C ...............' ........ "~ b.c .... ~ ....... -' ~- ,.~v~.., ,~ ....h All development areas outside the public right.f-way shall use high pressure sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site. c. Streets~pe Color Coordination. In order to aid in design continui~ along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, signifi~nt potions of all sffeet furniture shall be finished with a uniting ~lor per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. ~. ccfc~ ~ ~c ~c~cc~cd t.:~c~ .::~ ~h~5~ ~ ~m~ Section 17.32.060 - Trip Reduction A. A minimum of one shower facili~, a~essible to bo~ men and women, shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which meets the following ~resholds: Commercial 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms Section 17.32.070- Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines The potion of Foothill Boulevard be~een Haven Avenue and Inters~te 15 was not pa~ of the original Foothill Boulevard Study area; therefore the provisions of the original Specific Plan did not apply to development within this "Missing Link." Subsequently, these Guidelines were prepared in order to provide specific streets~pe design provisions through those potions of the Tefra Vista and Victoria Planned Communities and the Industrial Districts. The Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines, therefore, extend the concepts of the original Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan through the "Missing Link," thereby creating a dynamic con~urse with a uniting communi~ design image reflective of the communi~ heritage and identi~. A. Acfivi~ Centers: Activi~ Centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard Corddor defined as "Theme" or "Statement" areas which "tie" together the visual aspects of the Foothill Boulevard Coffidor through the ci~, promote concentrated activi~ at these areas, and give identi~ and theme to the areas in which they are Io~ted. The Activi~ Centers are lo.ted ~nfiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in the following drawing: DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "Al0" 17,32-49 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.050-17.32.070 ACTIVITY CENTERS ~.t~07~ ...... .. , - ,.~ Because three corners of the Haven Avenue intersection are fully or partially developed, the development provisions of the Activity Center are limited to those streetscape and landscape improvements within the public right-of-way. Therefore, many of the following standards apply only to the Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue Activity Centers: 1. Streetscape a. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The building setback areas will be enhanced pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials, formal landscape arrangements, and pedestrian-level lighting. b. Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks with special paving materials, light standards, and street furniture should be uniform throughout the FoothilL, Boulevard Corridor per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement j, Plan, c. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a formal, regularly spaced, street tree planting system utilizing a palette of informally shaped, colorful trees. d. The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondary/intersecting streets to a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway. Typically, the design will extend to at least the first driveway or as modified through the design review process. The extent of the urban streetscape should be able to adjust to changes in public right- of-way conditions such as right turn lanes and bus bays. 2. Site Planninq a. At activity centers, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to create a more appealing, active streetscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene are specifically prohibited. b. Multi-story buildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level. All ground story facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale. This can be accomplished through the breaking of facades into bays and the signage brought down in size and location. Further, this reduction in scale can be established through the use of elements which add horizontal articulation to the facades. DRCDCA 01-02 17.32-50 2/01 EXHIBIT "Al 1" Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17. 32. 050 -17.32. 070 B. Suburban Parkways: 1. Streetscape. a. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees, rolling turf berms, and meandering/undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral, suburban qualities. b. Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks with special paving, light standards, and street furniture shall be identical in style and finish to those used in the Foothill Boulevard corridor per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual- Improvement Plan. 2. Amhitectural Concept: a. The architectural characteristics shall be governed by the existing standards of the Development Code, Terra Vista Community Plan, and Victoda Community Plan. b. In situations where buildings are highly visible from the side streets and/or adjacent parking areas, special emphasis shall be placed on creating architectural interest. 3. Landscape Concept: The plantings will consist of informal treatments, dominated by London Plane (Platanus acarifolia), California Sycamore (Piatanus recemosa), and Flowering Plum (Prunus cerasifera) trees. Other species may be used to accent and/or supplement these designated tree types. The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with specific development proposals. C. Parkway Transitions: In order to provide a gradual transition from the urban activity centers to the suburban, informal parkways, "parkway transitions" will be introduced along the corridor. Parkway transitions are designed to blend the formal hardscape and tree planting pattern of the activity centers with the informal landscape and hardscape treatment of the suburban parkways. Specifically, the parkway transition is characterized by a 75- to 150-foot zone, dominated by Flowering Plum trees. Other tree species may be introduced to supplement the Flowering Plum to assist in creating a smooth transition. Please refer to the illustration shown in Section 17.32.050.D.5. D. General Guidelines: 1. Site Planning: a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on the boulevard. b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Driveways and service areas shall be located to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian circulation in and around the site. c. All auto related facilities (i.e. working bays, storage, etc.) shall be oriented/screened away from public view. d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as permitted by the applicable Community Plan or Chapter 17.30), and other high intensity pedestrian uses on the ground levels of all buildings within activity centers. DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT ~A12" 17.32-52 2/01 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32. 050 -17.32. 070 2. Parkinq Lots: a, Whenever possible, entries shall be located on side streets in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible, the Foothill Boulevard site entry shall be designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers (behind the public right-of-way) to differentiate it from the sidewalks. b. Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, shall be located as far from street intersections as possible. c. Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles and minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. d. Individual proiect parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. New development projects shall delineate on all plans where vehicular connections to adjacent properties are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provisions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved master plans. e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the street sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments. 3. Landscape Design: a. All street furniture, light standards, bollards, and similar hardware within 10 feet of the.public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Boulevard Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may vary and match related architecture. b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at the base of buildings. Asphalt edges at the base of structures are prohibited. Plant materials in containers are appropriate. c. Internal pedestrian circulation, linking office complexes with neighboring commercial or office developments, should be located close to buildings. d. Planting clusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of massing types should be great enough to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural feeling to the observer. e. Water conserving plantings and irrigation should be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No. 411-Xeriscape.) 4. Streetscape Li,qhtinq: a. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours. Lighting can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the streetscape design. b. All lighting fixtures, luminaries, poles and supporting hardware in the public'-]' right-of-way shall be consistent along Foothill Boulevard and approved by the City I Engineer, per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan.1 ~ ..................... ~ ................ wI DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "Al 3" 17.32-53 2/01 Rancho Cucarnon g a Development Code Sections 17. 32. 050 -17. 32. 070 ,., ...... t.~, ,~ ,.,, ,d ....... ~,, ,u ..................................... ~. ...... ~ Dr/ c. All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site. E. Foothill Boulevard Circulation Improvements 1. Center Median Pre.qram - Based upon traffic analyses, a continuous 14-foot wide raised landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide .benefits necessary to accommodate increased development and traffic demand throuoh ~ncreased vehicular capacity, increased vehicular/pedestrian safety, increased vehicular mobility, and increased vehicular level of service Median breaks shall occur only at major signalized intersections as determined by the City Engineer. Alternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 2. Median Desi.cln - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide access control and a unifying landscape statement. The median will feature basic types of planting. Accent tree planting (Crape myrtle), underplanted with a Iow evergreen groundcover, will be provided as median noses. Evergreen trees (Rhus lances), underplanted with shrubs and groundcover, will be planted throughout the balance of the median. F. Foothill Boulevard Site Development Standards 1. Setbacks - Activity Center (Suburban Parkway in Parenthesis) Building! Streetside¢~ '1't Floor 2"" Floor. Parkin~l Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue Activity Center: Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 25 feet* 45 feet (45 feet) (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) Milliken Avenue 25 feet* 25 feet* 45 feet (45-foot average. 30-foot minimum) Foothill Boulevard/Rochester Avenue Activity Center: Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 45 feet* 45 feet (45 feet) (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) Rochester 25 feet* 45 feet* 45 feet Avenue (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) (~) As measured from ultimate curb face * Refer to Section 17.30.040, Terra Vista Community Plan or Victoria Community Plan for additional regulations. DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "A14" 17.32-54 2/0'1 Rancho Cucamonf, a Development Code Sections 17.30. 060 E. Special Emphasis Areas. 1. Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both sides of Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street. Haven Avenue is a major north-south travel route and contains high-end office development with the unique combination of direct access to the Ontario Airport and the Interstate 10 Freeway. The standards in the Overlay District are designed to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high-quality, and prestigious gateway into the community. A progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development is required and special site planning and landscaping requirements are included to enhance the pedestrian environment and create a campus-like atmosphere. 2. Interstate 15 (Devore Freeway) runs north-south through the Industrial area and borders seven subareas in each land use category except for General Industrial/Rail Served. Since this area is directly south of the future regional mall and related commercial activities at the 1-15 Freeway and Foothill Boulevard, and views along the freeway have a major impact on the image and identity of Rancho Cucamonga, highest consideration should be given to design aspects that affect a positive image of the community as viewed from the freeway. Special considerations sro contained in the Development Standards for each subarea which abuts the I-15 Freeway. (An 1-15 Oveday District could provide special development criteria to eliminate unsightly views.) 3. Special Boulevards. The General Plan states that travel routes sro predoroinant elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image of perception of a route. Within the Industrial districts, nine special boulevards are included. The following is a brief description of the primary function and identity for the most significant special boulevards including Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Archibald Avenue, and 4th Street. a. Foothill Boulevard serves as the major east-west transportation corddor through the City. It also links the area east of Haven Avenue including the planned communities and regional shopping mall with the commercial area to the east. Within the Industrial districts (Subareas 6 & 7), new development along Foothill Boulevard must provide a transition to commercial and office facilities within the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans and the Etiwanda Specific Plan areas,,w and shall compiywith Section 17.32.060, Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines and~ the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Given the high_l visibility, office and commercial service type uses will predominate. Any light manufacturing or warehouse buildings will have to be designed to the highest quality and be compatible with commercial and residential environments on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. b. Archibald Avenue serves primarily as a support service function to the Industrial area. A variety of industrial, commercial, and residential uses exist along major podions of the street. The major opportunity along Archibald Avenue is on the west side of the street south of 6th Street. New development in this area must be compatible with adjacent residential uses and provide an appropriate transition in terms of architecture, site planning, and landscaping. One story buildings in scale with the single family homes fronting on 6th Street and pedestrian connections to residential should be provided. DRCDCA 01-02 EXHIBIT "A15" 17.30-43 6/99 ORDINANCE NO. ~_~ 7~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on January 16, 2002, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within Terra Vista Community Plan. b. On September 19, 1991, the Terra Vista Community Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 457 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard District. c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape, promote cohesiveness and preserve Historic Route 66. d. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRCTVCPA01-01- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 16,2002 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specificallyfinds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Victoria Community Plan, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan DRcvcP^ o~-o3~oRo~vcP^ o~-o~ EXH,B,~'^4" FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Industrial Area Specific Plan. I. INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THIS SUPPLEMENT ABOUT? On Septembe~ 16, 1987, the City Council approYed the Foothill Boulevard Specilic Plan (FBSP). 'llle Fi~SP was enacted to provide a unified development scheme for the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the · MIssing Link' Aren · O figure I - Missing Link Area The porQon of ~oothi]] ~:)a]evazd bebveen Have~ Avenue and the interstate 15 Fi-eewa¥ (~-15) was ~ot a part of the speci~c ptaa study; t~'e~ore, it~ provisions did ~ot apply to the deYelopme~t of this ~mis~ in~ ]ink." At the time of the FB$? approval, the City C. ota-tcJ] and P]arminj; Commission expressed a desire to inc]ude si~fficant desist provisions of the ;)]an in the development of the "missin~ link." This amendmeat to the Te~ra Vista Community ~ CWCP), the Victoria Community Plan (VCP), and the industrial ~ Spec~c Plan (]Si)) is proposal to include specific st~eetsca~e design provisions of the Fi~P in the develop- mere of the prope~ies ad, cent to Foothi~ Bou]eva.q:l. WHERE DOES IT APPLY? The ~ollo,,~n~ pm~isiom wi]] apply to ail properties borderin§ Foothill Boulevard withi~ the ¥(~, and ~SP. This amendment aul;me~ts the development re~Ldations a_qd standards of the T~C2), ¥CP, and L%?. ~ an issue, co]~lifion, or s~tuation occurs Which is not coYered or ~oYicled ;or in this amm'tdav~t or pm-A. sin~s of the TYCP, ¥CP, or L~', the re~fious of the Development Code of the City of Rancho (~ucamon~a that ate most applicable to the issue, condition, or sin]ation sha~ apply. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A2" Page 2 II. COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplermmt is intended to extend the concepts of the Foothill Boule- vard Specific Plan Io the "missing link" through the creation of a dynamic concourse that is at.active and of high quality with a unifying community design image reflective of the community heritage and identity, providing an economically viable ~ for a balanced mixture of commercial and ~idential uses with safe, efficient circulation and Create a community image that exp _res_ __,e~_ and enhances the unique characte~ and identity of Rancho Cucarnonga. Promote compagble building elevations which afford a human scale at pedestrian areas and provide transilions lo buildings of greater height, while protecting adjoining residential oondigons. Promote appropriate landscape mmUnents throughout the corridor, particularly those that are Iow maintenance, drought tolerant, and wind resistant within intense urban eondition~. Provide for the eonl~oi of visually objeclionable views, such as outdoor storage and ioadin8 areas, through proper ate design and screening, Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to cnmfing a "heritage~ statement for Fooggll Boulevard. Require compliance with community design guidelines in plans for new development and expansion or mtevelopment of existing development and make community deign a major consideration in site plan Utilize landscape materials which are dean, safe, wind resistant, and relalively low maintenance. Formal forms and conf~guralions should be uglized at aciivity center nodes while less formal configurations should be utilized throughout the parkway links between nodes. Designate special landscape and architectural features at major interseciion~ Combine thematic activity centem Changes in paving materials, lighting, signing, and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their distinctiveves__ s DRCVGPA 0q-03/DRGTVGPA 0q-0~ EXHIBIT "A3'~ 353 III. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVITY CENTERS: Activity centers are selected intersections alon~ the FoothiU Boulevard corridor defined as "Theme" or "Statement" areas which "tie" to~ether the visual aspects of the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the city, ACTIVITY CENTERS Figure 2 - A~I~ ~er Lo~flo~ 1. ~~: DRCVCPA 01-03/DEC'CPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A4" ~ 4 2. Site Planning: a. At activity centers, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to or. ale a more appealing, active st~etscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene are specifi,-~ny prohfoi~L b. Multi-slory buildings shall be desilp~l to relate ~o ~e pedestrian level. All ground story ~acades shall be desired lo relate to &e human scale. This can be accomplished ~hrou~h the breakin~ o~ ~acades inio bays and ~he silage brought down in size and location. Further, ~ reducUon in ~,ale can be eslabllshed flu-ouch ~he use o~ e]emenis which add horizontal articulation to the facades. Examplez of h~ese elements include pedeslrian arcadez and awnin~ (Milliken & Rochesler only.) c. Buildin~ ~ be desi~ed to eliminate a fi-a~nented, s~rip commercial appearance and should be orlentod to the actiwty cent' (Millii~n & Rochester only). d. Archileciure and outdoor spaces aion~ Foothill lkndevard shall be inl~'ally designed and oriented ioward fl~e l~odes~rian experience. The expe~ence should be visually diver"~e and sfimulati~ and should include acllvities h'~at creale a sense of variety and into~st (Milliken & Roch~o- only). SIruclures, pathways, and landscaping shall be incorporated wilhin the sRe so as to e~ure ease ~ access from one sale lo adjoining zi~es in a safe manner. L Buildin~ entrances shall be designed ~o accommodate logical l~des~rian access from the FooLhill Boulevard n'gh~-o~-way. This may include direct entrances ~mm Foothill Boulevard, separations in the b~ildin~ ~ha~ allow access ~o h~e interior plz ~,z areas, or o~her appropriate meihod~. a. Arohlteotural Oonoept: a. Within individual aeUvity center, the architectural ~'yle should be consistent to provide continuity of design at the inter~ction- 1. MiHike~ Activity Center - There are no existing buildings located at the Milliken activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Review process will establish the flavor for the area when ~wiewin~ the development propo~_ !~ New developments need not "duplicate" the architectural style of previous submittals but must be compatible in terms of architecture and orientation with the other comer(s) of the intersection. . 2. Rochest~ Activity Center - New proposals shall conside~ and respect the architectural style of existing buildings. For example, the Ag~otti Winery at the southeast com~ of Foothill and Rochester, is a potential National Historic Registry candidato. Any proposals for this activity ce~' should be designed to be ~ompafible with this structure. This does not mean that new ~ls must emulate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must complement existing buildings. b. Differentiate the ~round floor facades from the seconct floor in recognition of the diffe~enc~ in the charac~r~ of activities at the ~und floor level. Examples include, but are not limiled to, the use of stordront glass, stepped-back or tiered forms, fenestration, and othe~ appropriate architectural ~eatures ~acin; Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A5' 4. Landscal~ ~ommpt: The activity centers shall be distinguished from suburban (informal) parkway areas through Ihe useof formal, urban ~ plantings. These formal plantings shall border all consist of an offset double row of Crape Myrtle (Lage~troemia indica) ~ees along each road frontage. Addi- tional plant rnateri~l.~ ( eve,~i canopy flees, palms, etc.) may be introduced Io supplement the Crape Myrtle as a backdrop. The type and location of the additional materials should be based on the particular buiding design, scale, and :~ Plaa~ Paving Fountain Element Enr~ed Cross Walk Paving B. SUBURBAN PARKWAYS: 1. Streetscape: ' a. The parkways will be design~ with i~formal clusters of trees, rolling tuff berm% and and street fumitureshallbeidenfical.i9 stylean!i_ _flnit~t~used~i~, ,t~eF~SParea~ ~ ~M~Te Archltm~tuml ~onc~pt: a. The m~.hiieciilral characteristiCS shall be governed by the existing standards of the Development Code, TVCP, VCP, and ISP. b. In situations where buildings are highly visible from the side streets and/o~ adjacent parking areas, sp~ emp~is shall be placed on ranting arcUitecUn'al intems~ 3. Langs~ap~ ~oncept: The plantings will consist of informal treatmems, dominated by London Plane fPlatanus acerifolia), California Sycamore (Pla~anus racemosa), and Flowering Plum (Prunus cerasii~a) trees. Other species may be used to accent and/or supplement these designated ~ee types. The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with specific development propo~k C. PARKWAV TRANSIT[ON-m: lnorder to provide a gradual transifion /~om the urban acfivity centers ~o the submtmn, informal parkways, 'parkway transitions" will be introduced along ~ corridor. Parkway transitions are designed to blend the formal harciscape and tree plan~k~g pattern of the activity parkway Iransidon is characterized by a 75-foot to 150-foot zone, dominated by Flowering Plum h-ees. Other tree species may be introduced to supplement the Flowering Plum to assist in creating a smooth transition. ~-- %. · Primary Parkway Flowering Plum) Tree (SyG,mo~) Par~ay Transition Page 7 '~ D. GENERAL GUIDELINES: 1_ Site Planniag: a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating pla~s and allowin~ wider sidewalks on the boulevard. b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Driveways and service areas shall be located to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian ci~tlation in and around the site. c. Ail auto related facilities (ia. working bays, storage, etc.) shall be oriented/screened away from public view. d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited ~ uses (as ground levels of all buildings within activity centem. 2. Parldng Lots: a. Whenever possible, entries shall be located on side streets in order to minimize pedes- appropriately patterned concrete or pave~ (behind the public ri~ht-ofoway) to differentiate it from the sidewalk~ b. Parking at, ss points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, shall be located as far from street intersections as possible. c. . Parking areas shall be designed so that pedeslrlans walk parallel to moving vehicles and minimize the need for the ped~=,hlan to cross parking aisles. d. Individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-sito driveways which are dearly identified and easily recognized as conn,.lots. New development projects shall delineate on all plans where vehiodnr coRneCtions to adjacent properties are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provi- sions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved mastsr plans. e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the st~zt sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movemenL This can be accomplished by using design 3. Landscape Design: a. Ali street furniture, light stsndards, bollards, and similar hardware within 10 feet of the public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at'the base of buildings. Asphalt edges at the ba~e of sfa'uctures are prohibited. Plant materials in containers are appropriate. DRGVCPA 01-03/DRCTVGPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A8" s~,t~am~ Page 8 c. Internal pedestrian circula~on, linking office complexes with neighboring comm~- cial or office developments, should be located dose to buildings. d. Planting dusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of massing types should be great enough to p~ovide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural feeling to the observer. e. Water conserving plantings and irrigation shall be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No. 411- X~riscape.) 4. Streetscape Ughtlng: ~. a. It is the intent of strt~q~cape lightin~ to add a consiete~t, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours. Li~hfin§ can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the streetscape design. b. All lighting fixtures in the public right-of-way shall be consi~e,,t alon8 Foothill Boulevard and approved by the City F. ngine~ following recommendations of the Plannin~ Comr~i?~on. Mal~-iais shall be consistent and in ~ with the desi~d theme. Poles and supporting hardware shall be consistent wilh City standards. c. AU development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure sodium Ughfing. All direct Ught rays shall be cone-reed to ~e limi~ o~ the building site. IV. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS A. Center Median Pro_Gram - Based upon traffic analyses, a continuous l,l-foot wide raised landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The meai~ can provide bonefi~s n __ecs~__ ~y to accommodate increased development and l~affic demand in the followin~ areas: · Increased vehicular ~,~adty · Increased vehioder ]eve] of service Median breaks shall occur only at major sisnalized intersections as determined by the City Engineer. Allernale median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed lraffic safety analysis and subject to the ~view and approval of the City Engineer. I~. ~ - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide access control and a unifyin~ landscape statement. The median will feature two basic types of plantin8. Accent tree planling (Crape myrtle), underplanted with a low eversreen 8roundcove~, will be provided at median noses. DRCVCPA 0q-03/DRC'I'VCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT UA0" 7~ Pagc 9 (CRAFE MYR'II.E) TRIANGULAR SPACING AT 1; O,C. 6'; w/ir CONChl:'~iE PAVER MAINTENANCE EDGE RHUS LAHCEA 30' O.C. MA~Ofl EVERGREEN CC) CRETE PAVPJ~ m 'rYPtc,~ ~ I MORTAR BED COfK~ET~ I ~TA~ SEC~ Y~' Figure 6 - Median Design DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "AIO" Pagc 10 V. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. ~tbecks - Activi~ Center (Suburban Parkway in narenthesis} Foothill/MilliOn Activity Cent~:. · Foothill 25' (45') 25' ( -~ ) 45' (45' av~, 30' milo · Milliken 25' (~) 25' (~) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain) · Foothill 25' (45') 45'(~) 45' (45' avg, 3~7 rain) · Rochest~' 25' (.~) 45'(~) 4,5' (45' avs, ~0' rain) (1) As measured from ultimate curb face ( -~ ) Refer to TVCP, VCP, or/SP for regulations Building Setbe4:k Ratle / 2nd Sto~y Permitted mt Milliken ' Figure 7 - Activity Center Building Setback DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "Al1" Page. · Adjacent to Exisun§ or Planned Residential 25' ( -~ ) 15' ( -~ ) : Development · Adjacent to ~ or Piammd Commem~l 0'(~) 5'(~) Developmem B. Heiqht Limitations - Activity Centers · within 4~ of s~et c~'b f~e~ Foot, iH Boulevard (at Foothill Boulevard (at Rochester) Milliken Avenue ~ Avenue · Within lO0' of ~gte family re~de~fial district · Othe~locations · Towers, campaniles, rotundas (1) Refer to TV(P, VCP, ISP for suburban parkway areas. ( ~ ) Refer to TVCP, VC~, or ISP for regulations DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A12" ORDINANCE NO. ~ 77 AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-03, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on January 16, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within Victoria Community Plan. b. On September 19,1991, the Victoria Community Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 458 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill Boulevard District. c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifl/ing the streetscape, promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66. d. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCAVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Victoda Community Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Victoda Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Victoda Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. ClTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Victoria Community Plan, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "al" FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Industrial Area Specific Plan. I. INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THIS SUPPLEMEHT ABOUT? On September 16, 1987, the City Council approved the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP). The FBSP was enacted te provide a unified developrnent scheme for the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the community. Of prime importance to the FBSP are the special stint,ape design provisions which "file' rob, ether the visual aspects of this commercial roadway. 'Missing Link' Area . ¥1¢torla'~ Figure I - Missing Link Area The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the Interstate 15 Freeway ([-15) was not a part of the specific plan study; therefore, its pmvisions did not apply to the development of this "miss- in~ link." At the time of the F'~SP approval, the City Com~cll and Pla~ Commission expressed a desire to include significant design provisions of the plan in the development of the "mlssin~ link." This amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan CI~VCP), the Victoria Community Plan (VCP), and the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) is proposed to include specific st~elscape desitin provisions of the FBSP in the develop- ment of the properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. WHERE DOES IT APPLY? The following provisions will apply to all properties bordering Foothill Boulevard within the TVCP, VCP, and ISP. This amendment augments the development re~,ulations and standards of the TVCP, VCP, and ISP. When an issue, condition, or situation occurs Which is not covered or provided for in this amendment or provisions of the TVCP, VCP, or ISP, the regulations of the IXovelopme~t Code of the City of Rancho Cummonga that are most applicable to the issue, condition, or situation shall apply. DRovop^ 0 -03 DRO Cp^ II. COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is intended to extend the concepts of the Foothill Boule- vard Specific Plan to the "missing link" through the creation of a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality with a unifying community design image reflective of the community heritage and identity, providing an economically viable setting for a balanced mixture of commercial and residential uses with safe, effide~t circulation and a _cc~__~ A. GOAL: Create a community image that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonsa. Develop a streetscape system which designates major inlc,~-'tions as activity cente~ and emphasizes the suburban parkways between the activity centers as vehicular area~ Promote compatible building elevations which afford a human scale at pedestrian areas and provide transitions to buildings of greater height, while protecting adjoining residential conditions. Promote appropriate landscape treatments throughout the corridor, partiodarly those that are iow maintenance, drought tolel'ant, and wind resistant within intense urban conditions. Provide for the control of visually objectionable views, such as outdoor storage and loading areas, through proper site design and scmmin~ Develop consistent streetscape end architectural palettes which are semitive to creating a "heritage" statement for Foothill Boulevard. Require compliance with community design guidelines in plans for new development and expansion or redevelopment of existing development and make community design a major consideration in sim plan review and approval. Ulili~,e landscape materials which are dean, safe, wind resistant, and relatively low maintenance. Formal forms and configurations should be utilized at activity center nodes while less formal configurations should be utilized throughout the parkway links between nodes. Designate spedal landscape and architectural features at major intersections. Combine thematic plantings with contemporary architectural statements designed to promote a distinctive character for the activity centers. Changes in paving materials, lighting, signing, and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their distinctive__ _~: DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A3"" III. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVITY CENTERS: Activity centers are selected int=~ections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor defined as "Theme" or "Statement" areas which "tie" to~ the visual aspects of the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the dty, promote concenl~ated activity at these areas, and give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located. The activity centers are located confi~uous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in Figure 2. · ACTIVITY CENTERS ~ UJ UJ UJ · o O Figure 2 - Activity Center LOCatiORS Because throe comas of the Have~ Avenue inte~-~tion are fuUy or partially developed, the devei- opment provisions of the acfivit7 center are Umited to those streetscape and landscape improvements within the public ri~ht-of-way. Therefore, many of the following standards apply only to the Mifli~en Avenue and Rochester Avenue activity een~e~. 1. Streetscape: a. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The building standard~andsh.eet~fumituresh~gdbeunif~rmthr~u~'~puttheF~-th..d~.~B~u~e~-~`ar`d` i:orrido[, ~ ~ c. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a {ormal, m~ularly spaced, Sl~%'t ~ p]ailtil~ system ulili~l~ a pa]ctte of iul, omla]]y sha]:~od, colorhd trees. d. The urban or {orrnal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondary/ini~ecting streets to a point of logical tra~siliou to the suburban parkway. Typical]y, the design will extend to at least the first driveway or as modffied throu~ the design mvlew process. The extent of the urban streetscape should be able to adjust to chan~s in public right- of-way conditions, such as right tom lanes and bas bays. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRGTVGPA 01-01 EXHIBIT 'A4" Page 4 2. Site Planning: a. At activity center~, bullclings may be placed at or adjacent to the front ~tback line to crea~ a more appealing, active si~,~_~pe. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the stmetscene are b. Mul§.~tmy buildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level. All ~ ,toW facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale. This can be accomplished through the breaking of facade~ into bay~ and the ~a~e brought down in ~ and location. Further, this ~:hiction in n~ale can be established through the u~ of elements which add horizontal articulation to the facades. ~xan'~le~ of these elements include padeslrlen arcades and awnings. (Milliken & Roch~ler only.) c. Building~ ~ be designed to eliminate a fragmental, strip commercial appearance d. Archttectm, e and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian exp~ence. The experience should be visually divm'ae and stimulating and should include activities that create a .sense of variety and interest (Milliken & Roche~- only). e~sure ease of access ~rom one ~ite to adioining ~tes in a safe manner. f. Building entrances shall be designed ~o accommodate logical l~destrian a _cces__s from the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. This may include direct entrances ~vom Foothill Boulevard, ~aration~ in fl~e buildings fl~at allow acce~ to the inte~or plata areas, or othe~ appropriate method~ 3. Architectural Concept: a. Within individual activity center, the architectural style should be consistent to provide continuity of design at the intersection. 1. Milliken Activity Center- There are no existing buildings located at the Milliken activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Review process will estsblish the flavor for the area when reviewing the development proposals. New developments need not "duplicate" the architectural style of p~vious submittals but must be compatible in terms of architecture and orientation with the other corner,s) of the intersecoon 2. Rochester Activity Center - New proposals shall consider and respect the architectural style of existing buildings. For example, the Ag~ ~otti Winery at the southeast com~ of Foothill and Rochester, is a potential National Historic Registry canclidale. Any proposals for this activity center should be desigl~ed to be compatible with this structure. This does not mean that new proposals must emulate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must complement existin~ building~ b. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the secondfloor in recognition of the differences in the characic~ of activities at the ground floor level. Examples include, but a~ not limited to, the use of storefront ~lass, stepped-back or tiered forms, fenestration, and other appropriate architectural features facing Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A5" 7~91 Page 4. Landscape Concept: The activity centers shall be distin~gshed from suburban (informal) parkway areas through the use of formal, urban tree planlinl~ These formal plantings shall border all activity centers and shall define these'areas as bein~ higher intensity, urban districts. The plantings shah consist of an offset double mw of Crape Myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) trees along each road {rontage. Addi- tional plant materials ( eye,teen canopy trees, palms, etc.) may be introduced lo supplement the Crape Myrtle as a backdrop. The type and location of the additional materials should be based on the partio,l-~ bulding design, scale, and setback. Tree Pl~fing Two Sto~ Building ~n~ed P~ Paving F~n~in Element Enriched Cross Walk Paving ACTIVITy CEN_ TER/iNTERSECTION CONCEPT En~ oacvc o -o3/oacwC EXHIBIT "A6' Fou~a~ Planting ~7~ B. SUBURBAN PARKWAYS: 1. Streetscape: a. The parkways will be designed with irdormal dusters of trees, rolling turf berms, and b. St~'~scape elem(mt~ such as bo[lards, ==wa]ks with special pavin~, li~t ,tandard~-~ and strt'et/umi -tFre shall be kimtical ~ style and firdsh t° th°se used-in the FBSP area-~ 2. Architectural Concept: a. The architectural character/st)cs shall be ~ovemed by the exist/hi; standards of the Development Code, TVC~', VCP, and ISP. b. In s/tuations where buildin~ are highly visib)e from the s/de streets and/or adjacent parldnt; areas, slx, da) emphas/s shaft be placed on creatin; architectural interest. 3. Landscape concept: The phn~in~s ~ consist o~ in/ormal treatments, dominated by London Plane (P]atanus acerlfoZia), California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), and F]owerin8 Plum (Prunus Ceras/;'~=) trees. Other spedes ma), be used to accem and/or supplement these desiEnated tree types. The type and location of these spedes should be reviewed in conjunction with specific developm~t C. PARKWAY TRANSmONS: In order to provide a Eradual transifion /rom the urban activity Paricwa¥ mms/tions are de~/~:l to blend ~he formal hardscape and tree plantin~ pattern of the activity parkway trans/tion is characterized by a 75-/oot to 150-foot zone, dominated by Flowerin~ Plum trees. Other tree species ma}, be introduced to supplement the Fiowe~in~ Plum to assist in creatiz~ a smooth transit/on. .... ,- · . . .... '~:~ ~.~ ~:~...,:~.~ - '.- :~'~ ;~:.'t ..... 6' Me.nderin, Sldew,l~ ~ ~ A~en, Tree (Flowering Plum) Primary Pnr~wny DRCVCPA 01-03/DRC~CPA 01-01 Tree (Sy=nmom) ~ Mounded Tmf EXHIBIT "AT" Figure 5 - Par~w Transition D. GENERAL GUIDELINES: Site Plannin~ a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that comple~nent and expand the existin§ pedestrian rights-of-way alon8 Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating pl~s and allowing wide~ sidewalks on the boulevard. b. Buildings shall be desisned and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Driveways and service areas shall be kx:ated to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian circulation in c. All auto mfated facilities fi.e. working bays, storage, etc.) shall be oriented/screened away from public view. d. Buildin~ should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as permitted by the applicable Community or Specitic Plan), and other high intensity pedestrian uses on the ground levels of ali buildinss within activity ce~tei's. 2. Parking Lot~: a. Wbenever pnssthle, en~es sball be located on side streets in order to minimize podes* trian/vehicular cordlicts. When this is not possible, the Foothill Boulevard site entry shall be designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers (behind the public right-of-way) to differentiate it from the sidewall~ b. Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, shall be located as far from street intersections as possible. c. . Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles and minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. d. individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. New development projects shall delineate on ali plans where vehicular connections to adjacent properiies are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provi- sions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved master plans. e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the stvaet sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments. 3. Landscape Design: a. All steer furniture, light standards, bollards, and similar hardware within 10 feet of the public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may vary and match related archhecture. b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at'the base of buildings. Asphalt edges at the base of siructures are prohibited. Plant materials in containers are appropriate. DRGVGPA 0q-03/DRG-FVGPA 01-0q EXHIBIT ~AB" so,~t~r~M Page 8 7t~l c. Internal pedestrian circulation, linking office complexes with neighboring commer- cial or office developments, should be located close to buildings. d. PlanUng clusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of massin~ types should be great enough to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural feeling to the observer. e. Water conservin~ plantings and irri~ation shall be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No. 411- Xeriscape.) 4. Streetscape Ughtlng: a. It is the intent of st~etscape lightin~ to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours. Lighting can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the si~oetscape deign. b. All lighting fixtures in the public fight-of-way shall be con~s~=,t alon~ Foothill Boulevard and approved by the City Engineer following recommendations of the Planning Commission. Materials shall be consistent and in keeping with the desi~d theme. Poles and supporting hardware shall be c. All development areas outside the public fight-of-way shall use high pressure IV. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS A. Center Median Pro_oram. ~ased upon traffic analyses, a continuous 14-~oot wide raised landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide benefits n _e,'~_~ry to accommodate increased development and traffic de, hand in the following a~as: · Increased vehicular level of service Median breaks shaU occur only at major sig~,~ed intersections as detr~,,~ined by the City Engineer. AJternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic safety analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. a. ~ - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide aece~ control and a unifyin& landscape statement. The median will feature two basic types of planting. Accent t~e planting (Crape myrtle), underpianted with a low evergreen groundcover, will be provided at median noses. Eve~- balance of the median. (See figure 6.) DRGVGPA 01-03/DRG'I'VGPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A9" ?a~ Page 9 ME.~AN ACCENT TREES (CRAPE MYRTLE) TFI]ANGULAR SPACING ,AT~ 15' O,C. 6 CUR~ W/18' CONCRETE PAVER /- MAINTENANCE EDGE COf~RE'rE PAVERS ~1 TY~.,AL MORTAR BED CONCRETE DETAIL SECTION PARKWAY/ME'AN ACCENT TREE //"' CRAPE MYRTLE / MAJOR EVERGREEN ME[NAN TREE t E~. EO. [ SECTION 14'~0" TYPICAL I ~ LOCATION Figure 6 - Median Design DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "AIO" Page 10 ?~)~ V. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Setbacks - Activity Center (Suburban Parkway in _~arenthesis} ~ 1st Floo~ ~ Foothill/Milliken Activity Orate. · Foothill 25' (45') 25' (-~) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain) · ~imkea 25'(~ ) 25' (:~) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain) Foothill/Rochester Activit7 Center:. · Foothill 25' (45') 45' ( ~ ) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain) · Rochest~ 25' (~) 45' (-~) 45' (45' ars, 30' rain) (1) As measured from ullimate curb face ( ~ ) Refer to TV(P, VCP, or ISP for mgulallons Figure 7 - Activity Center Building Setback DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01, ~XH,.,~- ~^11" ~'~ ' j 7-~ · Adjacent 1~ Exislin§ or Planned Residential 25' ( ~ ) 15' ( -~ ) Development · Adjacent i~ existing or Planned Commerdal O' (-~) 5'(-~) Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Resldemial Development 25'(-~) 15' (-~) · Adjacent to Existiz~ or Development 5' (~) 5' (~) B. Height Limlt~tlons - Aetivl~ Centers ~11 · Within 4~ of s~eet curb face: Foothill ~ (at R~) ~ ~illi~ A~ ~' ~ A~ue ~ · Wi~ 1~ of ~e f~ ~id~ ~ ~' · ~ l~fiom (~) · T~. ~, m~ (~) (1) Refef~o TVCP, VCP, ISP for suburban parkway area~ ( ~ ) R~f~ to TVCP, VCP, or ISP for regulations DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 EXHIBIT "A12" ~ Page 12 ?~' :::2'-// ~_~/~ THE CITY OF I~A N C H 0 C U CAI+I 0 N GA i Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Bred Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grehn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PREPARE THE FEDERALLY REQUIRED UPDATE TO THE CITY'S ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE. RECOMMENDATION Approve the distribution of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the comprehensive update of the City's Analysis of Impediments (Al) to Fair Housing Choice and authorize the City Manager to execute the contrect for completion of the update. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's last update was prepared in 1996, and updates to the Al are required every 5 years. The Al is a review of impediments to fair housing choice in the public and private sector. The Al generelly includes the following: 1. A comprehensive review of the City's laws, regulations, and administretive policies, procedures, and practices. 2. An assessment of how those laws, etc., affect location, availability, and accessibility of housing. 3. An assessment of conditions affecting fair housing choice in both the public and pdvate sector. 377 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RFP DISTRIBUTION FOR ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS UPDATE January 16, 2002 Page 2 The schedule for completion of the Al will take approximately 5 months, which includes time for distribution of the RFP, acceptance of the Consultant, and the Consultant's time for preparing the update. Completion of the comprehensive update of the City's Al will cost approximately $25,000 to $30,000 and will be funded entirely through CDBG funds (Account 12043135650-1228204). Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG:Is Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Request for Proposals CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Submittal Deadline: Thursday, February 14, 2002, 5:00 p.m. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ i Application .................................................................................................................................. 1 Submission Deadline .................................................................................................................. 1 Notice Re§arding Disclosure of Document Contents .................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Back§round ................................................................................................................................ 2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................ 2 Key Tasks ................................................................................................................................... 4 Insurance .................................................................................................................................... 4 General Liability Insurance ...................................................................................................... 5 Workers' Compenstion Insurance ............................................................................................ 5 Evidence of Insurance ............................................................................................................. 5 Insurance Ratin§ ..................................................................................................................... 5 Notice to the City, Insurance Coverage Change ...................................................................... 5 Funding ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Submittal ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Contract Terms and Requirements ............................................................................................. 6 Personal Services Contract ..................................................................................................... 6 Required Documentation ......................................................................................................... 6 Proposal Contents - Submission Requirements ......................................................................... 7 Transmittal Letter .................................................................................................................... 7 Cover Sheet ............................................................................................................................ 7 Statements .............................................................................................................................. 7 Work Plan and Performance Schedule .................................................................................... 7 Proposed Price ........................................................................................................................ 8 Evaluation Criteria and Selection Process .................................................................................. 8 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................... 8 Selection Process ................................................................................................................... 8 Attachments ................................................................................................................................ 9 Attachment A - Contract for Professional Services .................................................................. 9 Attachment B - Suggested Component of the Al ..................................................................... 9 APPLICATION Legal Name of Consultant: Address: City: Zip: Executive Director: Telephone: Contact Person: Telephone: Consultant's Cost for Services: $ The above named Consultant hereby submits a proposal for funding from the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to a Request for Proposal ("RFP"). The Consultant warrants that all information in the proposal package is true to the best of her knowledge and belief. The Consultant further agrees to abide by all conditions and requirements in the RFP. The Consultant also understands that this proposal is the Consultant's entire proposal and cannot be amended after submission, except as provided for in the RFP, and by agreement between the City and Consultant. Authorized Signature: Title: Name/Title of Authorized Signatory: SUBMISSION DEADLINE: THURSDAY, February 14, 2002, 5:00 p.m. For City of Rancho Cucamonga Use Only: Date/Time Received: By: NOTICE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENT CONTENTS All responses to this RFP accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall become the exclusive property of the City. At such time as the Planning Department recommends a Consultant to the City Council, and such recommendation, with any recommended contract appears on the City Council agenda, all proposals accepted by the City shall become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public, with the exception of those elements of each proposal which are defined by the Consultant as business or trade secrets and plainly marked as "Trade Secret," "Confidential," or "Proprietary." Each element of a proposal which a Consultant desires not to be considered a public record must be clearly marked as set forth above, and any blanket statement (i.e., regarding entire pages, documents or other non-specific designations) shall not be sufficient and shall not bind the City in any way whatsoever. If disclosure is required or permitted under the California Public Records Act or otherwise by law, the City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records or part thereof. INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") is seeking a qualified firm ("Consultant") to update the City's Analysis of impediments ("Al") to Fair Housing Choice and the Fair Housing Plan in compliance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Department ("HUD") regulations. The Consultant will prepare the Al and Fair Housing Plan for submittal to HUD. The Al identifies the impediments that deter residents from having fair housing choices within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Fair Housing Plan states how the City will act on its responsibility to address the impediments and take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments, maintain records reflecting the analysis and other actions in this regard. The selected Consultant will perform professional services under the supervision of the Planning Department, Advanced Planning Division. BACKGROUND In 1996 the HUD notified the City of new Consolidated Plan submission regulations for Community Planning and Development programs, (i.e., Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") Program). Localities participating in federal grant programs are required to certify that the City will engage in fair housing planning (24 CFR 570.601). The Al is an integral part of the Consolidated Plan and should be updated at the end of each 5-year cycle (24 CFR 91). The City's current Consolidated Plan covered the 5-year period of 1996-2000. SCOPE OF WORK In conjunction with and under the supervision of the Planning Department, Advanced Planning Division, the Consultant will provide the following services: A. Demonstrate professional methods of research, data collection, and formulation. This data will be relevant to housing issues in the City (i.e., demographics, household income, employment, housing profile, etc.). B. Develop a comprehensive Al. This document must include: 1. Discussion of current impediments to fair housing opportunities. 2. Action plan addressing identified impediments, including goals and timetables. 3. Identified actions that will be taken. C. Be available to attend required project related meetings (i.e., staff meetings, community meetings, Planning Commission, City Council, etc.) D. Demonstrate excellent verbal and written communication skills. E. Work with designated staff persons. F. Utilizing an industry standard methodology, the selected consultant must provide analyses of impediments to fair housing choices in the public and private sectors, that include, but are not limited to: 1. A comprehensive review of the City's ordinances, administrative policies, practices, and procedures. 2. Assessment of how those laws, etc., affects the location, availability, and accessibility to housing choice. 3. Assessment of local residents' and the real estate industry's awareness of fair housing issues. 4.Assessment of current land use and group home practices. 5. Analysis of differences in property tax rates, controlling for home value and year of purchase, for different racial groups within the City. 6. Assessment of job opportunities in relationship to area or residential concentration of minorities and other classes of persons protected by the Fair Housing Act. 7. Document the nature and extent of fair housing complaints/lawsuits or other data that may evidence achievement of or lack of fair housing choices. 8. Demographic overview of Rancho Cucamonga, showing how the City compares to the county as a whole in racial, ethnicity, religion, gender, national origin, age, disability, and familial status composition since 1990. 9. Assessment of homeownership in Rancho Cucamonga in comparison to the county, by race, ethnicity, religion, gender, national origin, age, disability, and familial status since 1990. 10. Assessment of affluence, and poverty in Rancho Cucamonga, in comparison to the county, by race, ethnicity, religion, gender, national origin, age, disability, familial status since 1990. 11. Patterns of ownership versus rental, housing density, housing age and/or condition, overcrowding, income, family size, residency tenure, bank loans by type, etc., related to classes of persons protected by the Fair Housing Act. 12. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, including FHA/VA, conventional home, housing refinance, and home improvement loans related to classes of persons protected by the Fair Housing Act. 13. Testing results or case studies of incidents or problems of discrimination occurring within the City, including hate crimes, land use practices, occupancy standards, and advertising. 14. Results of Fair Housing Initiative Programs (FHIP) grants. 15. Records showing geographic patterns of occupancy in Section 8; Public and Assisted Housing, and private rental housing. 16. Analysis of major forms of transportation serving Rancho Cucamonga. Identify access to adjacent job centers. 17. Analysis of home sales trends, median and average sale prices by type, number of households and size, and banking and lending practices. Compile data indicating the frequency and amount of those financial institutions lending in our community over the past 5-year period. 18.Compile a vacancy rate study for rental properties by type/number of bedrooms and rental rates over the past 2-year period. 19. Provide a variety of maps including dot density, overlays, etc., depicting multiple characteristics and address specific maps in the Al, using GIS compatible submittal data format (ArcView). 20.Recommend changes in practices and policies. 21.Prepare a minimum of ten (10) bound copies and one loose copy (for duplication purposes) of the Al and the Fair Housing Plan. 22. Submit the entire document on computer disks using a software program compatible with the City's word processing system (Microsoft Word). G. The ability to meet established deadlines. H. The selected consultant must demonstrate personal/professional commitment and integrity. KEY TASKS Task 1 Data Collection and Review - This task will consist of the review of available background and resource materials. Available documents and resources will include: a) Consolidated Plan (2000-2004) b) City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element; and c) City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code, etc. Task2 Workshops and Community Meetings - Coordinate and facilitate community workshops and focus groups. City staff will assist in noticing and organizing the workshops, arranging for use of facilities, etc. A minimum of three (3) focus groups and/or workshops will be held during the process (realtor associations, developers, properly investors, community residents, seniors, special needs populations, etc.) The consultant will provide the following services related to this task: a) prepare agendas, handouts and other presentation materials as appropriate b) maintain detailed notes, summarize the results of each group meeting. Task 3 Prepare Draft Al - Based on the review of resources, data gathering, analysis, and input from the community through workshops/focus groups, etc., pursuant to the requirements of the City's Fair Housing Plan and all applicable HUD regulations. Present the Draft Al to City Staff. Task 4 Present Draft Al for public comment(s) and input. Task 5 Presentation of Al to City and City Council - Transmittal and presentation of the final Al for approval and adoption. INSURANCE During the entire term of this Agreement, Consultant agrees to procure and maintain: A. General Liability Insurance: General liability insurance at its sole expense to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily injury, including death therefrom suffered or alleged to be suffered by any person or persons whomsoever, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or activities of Consultant, its subcontractors, or any person acting for Consultant or under its control or direction, and also to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages to any property of any persons caused directly or indirectly by or from acts or activities of Consultant, or its subcontractors, or any person acting for Consultant or under its control or direction. Such public liability and property damage insurance shall also provide for and protect the City of Rancho Cucamonga against incurring any legal cost in defending claims for alleged loss. Such public liability and property damage insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect throughout the terms of the Agreement and any extension thereof in the minimum limits provided below: General Liability - A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of $2,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the minimum limits. Bodily Injury $1,000,000 per occurrence Property Damage $1,000,000 per occurrence B. Workers' Compensation Insurance: Consultant or any subcontractors hired by Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole expense, Workers' Compensation Insurance in such amounts as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both the Consultant and the City of Rancho Cucamonga against any loss, claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases happening to any worker employed by Consultant or Consultant's subcontractor in the course of carrying out the Agreement. C. Evidence of Insurance: A Certificate of Insurance, or an appropriate insurance binder evidencing the above insurance coverage shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the execution of this Agreement on behalf of the City, and shall contain the following endorsement: Solely as respect to work done by or on behalf of the named insured for the City, it is agreed that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents, are added as additional insured under this policy and the coverage(s) provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any other insurance available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents, under any third party liability policy. D. Insurance Ratinq: Insurance companies providing insurance hereunder shall be rated (A minus: VII - Admitted) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct insurance business in the State of California. E. Notice to the City, Insurance Covera.qe Change: The terms of the insurance policy or policies issued to provide the above insurance coverage shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or canceled by the carrier, for non-payment of premiums or otherwise, without thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail or amendment or cancellation to the City, except that cancellation for non-payment of premium shall require ten (10) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail. In the event the said insurance is canceled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit to the City Clerk new evidence of insurance in the amounts established. FUNDING CDBG Program funds are currently budgeted for payment of services under this RFP. SUBMITTAl. One original and two (2) copies of the proposal must be received by THURSDAY, February 14, 2002, 5:00 p.m. All proposals must be typed. Handwritten proposals will not be accepted. Proposals that are incomplete, out of order, have inadequate number of copies or have other content errors or deficiencies may be rejected. Contextual changes and/or additions to the proposal after submission may not be accepted. Postmarked or facsimile (FAX) transmission copies will not be accepted. Questions related to the submission of your proposal should be directed to Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750. Proposals must be submitted to: Proposals submitted by mail, address to: Tom Grahn, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Proposals submitted by hand delivery should be delivered to: Tom Grahn, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CONTRACT TERMS AND REQUIREMENTS A. Personal Services Contract: Upon the City's selection of a Consultant, twenty-eight (28) days will be made available for negotiations and execution of a Professional Services Contract (sample included as Attached A). Upon execution of the Contract, the Consultant will commence the provision of services for the preparation and submittal of the City's Fair Housing Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. It is anticipated that the Al and Fair Housing Plan will be completed by Thursday, June 13, 2002, allowing 91 days for performance. Execution of the Professional Services Contract prior to close of the negotiation period does not change the project completion date, but may allow greater time for performance. The contract will outline the terms and conditions of the award. The contract is a legally binding agreement and failure to adhere to its terms and conditions may result in termination of the contract and the required repayment of the funding award. B. Required Documentation: The following documents will be required in order to execute the contract. The list of items will include and is not limited to the following: 1. Work Plan and Performance Schedule 2. Project Budget 3. Evidence of satisfactory compliance with General Insurance Requirements 4. Applicable Business License PROPOSAL CONTENTS - SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All proposals must include the following documents to be considered complete and responsive: A. Transmittal Letter: 1. Brief summary of the proposed activity, and overall approach for implementation; 2. Brief highlights of the Consultant's qualifications; 3. Demonstration of Consultant's ability for timely completion; 4. Names, telephone/fax numbers, and e-mail address of contact persons. B. Cover Sheet: The authorized submission of your proposal. (Signature required) · C. Statements: 1. A statement that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirely as a part of the Consultant's proposal. 2. A statement that this RFP and the Consultant's proposal will jointly becomes part of the "Agreement for Professional Consultant Services" for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by the Consultant and City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. A single and separate section "EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this Request for Proposal upon which the consultants proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP. 4. A statement of qualifications applicable to this project: a) Names, qualifications, resumes, and proposed duties of the Consultant's staff involved with the Al. b) References for recent similarly completed projects. c) Descdbe the organization, experience, and administrative capacity regarding prior work related to federal community planning and development programs. d) Describe the Consultant's abilities and experiences in providing fair housing counseling/services, administering, monitoring fair housing programs, fair housing consultant services, etc. Provide evidence of previous experience including a "sample" document, which represents a completed and submitted federal Fair Housing Plan, including an Al. 5. Consultant's hourly rate schedule and a statement that said schedule is part of the Consultant's proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments, and any extra work that may be incurred that is not part of this RFP. 6. A statement that the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. D. Work Plan and Performance Schedule 1. Detailed Work Plan a) Performance Schedule (to include specific activities). b) Required Scheduling. c) Measurable Benchmarks. E. Proposed Price: The City's cost for the performance of services outlined in this RFP. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SELECTION PROCESS Each proposal will be evaluated on its own merits by the following criteria for content, responsiveness, clarity, relevance, and strict adherence to the instructions in this RFP. As explained above, incomplete application packages will not be considered. The maximum allowable score is 100. A. Evaluation Criteria 1. Statement of Qualifications (15 Points) Measures the Consultant's experience and administrative capacity relative to similar projects specifically related to expertise in Fair Housing. 2. Work Plan and Performance Schedule (55 Points) Measures the Consultant's presentation of a detailed work plan to be performed under this RFP. This includes a list of specific activities to be performed, measurable benchmarks, scheduling, timelines, etc. 3. Proposed Price (25 Points) Measures the Consultant's capability to utilize available funds and other resources in a cost effective manner. It will also examine the reasonableness of the proposed price for services. 4. Local Preference (5 points) Provides preference for local business. Total 100 points B. Selection Process The evaluation process will be based on the criteria listed above. All eligible proposals will be evaluated, and placed in rank order based on points received. The evaluation process will include an extensive review of each proposal as well as all supplemental materials (i.e., sample documentation of completed work projects, resumes, etc.) as provided. Ineligible proposals and incomplete proposals will not be considered. Attachments ATTACHMENT A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATTACHMENT B SUGGESTED COMPONENT OF THE Al ATFACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of January 2002 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ("CITY"), a municipal corporation, and a consulting firm ("CONSULTANT"). RECITALS: (a) The CITY is in need of services with respect to completion of an Update of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and the Fair Housing Plan; and (b) CONSULTANT is willing and able to provide such service; and (c) Such services are needed on a limited and non-exclusive basis. 2. SERVICES: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to the CiTY the services described in Paragraph 3. 3. ~: CONSULTANT shall, at its own cost and expense, and on a non-exclusive basis, furnish the following services as requested by the CITY: (a) CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the CONSULTANT's Proposal Response to the RFP for an Update of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, attached and incorporated by reference. (b) All services shall be performed to the satisfaction of the CITY. (c) All services shall be performed in accordance to 24 CFR 91, et aL and the federal guidelines and requirements as set forth by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (d) CONSULTANT shall conduct one presentation of the completed Impediments to Fair Housing Analysis to the City Council. 4. MFTHOD AND TIME OF PERFORMANCF: This agreement shall become effective upon execution by all parties: (a) CONSULTANT shall commence its services immediately after the execution of this Contract, and shall complete the services on or before June 13, 2002. (b) The Time of Performance under this contract may only be extended in writing by the CITY, and only upon a showing of good cause, in the CITY's sole discretion. 5. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT: CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all labor, materials and equipment which may be required to fumish services pursuant to this Agreement. ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 2 6. COMPENSATION AND FI::FR: (a) Fee Schedule: The CITY agrees to pay and CONSULTANT agrees to accept compensation on a task basis according to the CONSULTANT's fee schedule, which will remain in effect throughout the term of this contract. Compensation for a task shall not exceed the amount specified in schedule, without prior approval of the CITY. (b) Maximum Compensation: Total compensation for all services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of , without pdor approval of the CITY, (c) In addition to the direct labor costs, other indirect costs, necessary for completion of the work, shall be paid for at actual cost. Such costs shall include, but not limited to: printing, postage, telephone, fax, and computer usage. These indirect costs shall be included in the total amount of of this contract award. (d) Method of Payment: By the 20th day of each month, CONSULTANT shall submit monthly requisitions to the CITY specifying the amount due for services performed by CONSULTANT and for approved directly related expenses for the prior calendar month. Upon approval of the requisition, CITY will either pay or object to all or a portion of each requisition within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof. Upon resolution of objections, CITY will pay for objected-to requisitions within thirty (30) days after resolution of the objections. (e) Change Orders: No payment for services caused by a change in scope of work or complexity of work, or for any other reason, shall be made unless and until such services and a price therefore have been previously authorized in writing and approved by CITY as a written change order. The change order shall establish the changes of work, extension of time for preparation, and adjustment of the fee to be paid by CITY to CONSULTANT. 7. ~: This Agreement is binding upon CITY and CONSULTANT and their successors and assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in this Agreement or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other. 8. ACCESS TO CITY FACILITIES' The CITY shall permit access to its facilities by CONSULTANT throughout the term of the contract. 2 ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 3 9. GENERAL PROVISIONS: (a) The Consultant - An Independent Contractor: It is understood and agreed that the CONSULTANT is, and at all times shall be, an independent contractor and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the CONSULTANT or any individual whose compensation for services is paid by the CONSULTANT, an agent or employee of the CITY, and shall furnish such services in its own manner and method except as required by this Contract. Further, CONSULTANT has and shall retain the dght to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all persons employed by CONSULTANT in the performance of the services hereunder. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save CITY harmless from all manners relating to the payment of its employees, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever. (b) ~: CONSULTANT may also retain or sub-contract for the services of other necessary consultants with the pdor written approval of the CITY. Payment for such services shall be the responsibility of CONSULTANT. Any subconsultants employed by CONSULTANT shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement, except that the CITY shall have no obligation to pay any subcensultant for services rendered under this Contract. (c) Administration of Contrac. t: The CITY shall designate a CITY representative and the CONSULTANT shall designate a CONSULTANT representative. The CITY representative and CONSULTANT representative shall be the pdmary contact people for each party regarding performance of this Agreement. The City Planner, or designee, shall be the CITY representative, shall be the CONSULTANT's representative. The CITY and CONSULTANT representatives shall cooperate in all matters regarding this Agreement and in such manner as will result in the performance of the services in a timely and expeditious fashion. (d) Time: CONSULTANT shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be necessary for satisfactory and timely performance of CONSULTANT's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. (e) Indemnific.~tion and Hold Harmle$,~: CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, defend and save the CITY, its officers, their agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, damages or injuries to any person, including injury to CONSULTANT's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of this Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent acts of CONSULTANT, its agents or employees, and all expenses of investigating and defending against the same; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include any claims arising from the sole negligence or willful 3 ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 4 misconduct of the CITY, its officers, agents or employees. (0 General LiabiliK,.. Insurance.' Dudng the entire term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to procure and maintain general liability insurance at its sole expense to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily injury, including death therefrom suffered or alleged to be suffered by any person or persons whomsoever, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or activities of CONSULTANT, its subcontractors, or any person acting for CONSULTANT or under its control or direction, and also to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages to any property of any persons caused directly or indirectly by or from acts or activities of CONSULTANT, or its subcontractors, or any person acting for CONSULTANT or under its control or direction. Such public liability and property damage insurance shall also provide for and protect the CITY against incurring any legal cost in defending claims for alleged loss. Such public liability and property damage insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect throughout the terms of the Agreement and any extension thereof in the minimum limits provided below: Bodily Injury $1,000,000 per occurrence Property Damage $1,000,000 per occurrence A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of $2,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the above minimum limits. (g) Workers' Cnmpensatic)n Insurance,: CONSULTANT or any subcontractors hired by CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain, at its sole expense, Workers' Compensation Insurance in such amounts as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both the Contractor and the CITY against any loss, claim, or damage adsing from any injuries or occupational diseases happening to any worker employed by CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT's subcontractor in the course of carrying out the Agreement. (h) ~: A Certificate of Insurance, or an appropriate insurance binder evidencing the above insurance coverage shall be submitted to the Neighborhood Preservation Division prior to the execution of this Agreement on behalf of the CITY, and shall contain the following endorsement: 4 ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 5 "Solely as respect to work done by or on behalf of the named insured for the CITY, it is agreed that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents, are added as additional insured under this policy and the coverage(s) provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any other insurance available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, employees and agents, under any third party liability policy." (i) Insurance companies providing insurance hereunder shall be rated (A minus: VII - Admitted) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct insurance business in the State of California. (j) Notice to the Ci .ry. Insurance CoverAge ChAnge: The terms of the insurance policy or policies issued to provide the above insurance coverage shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or canceled by the carder, for non-payment of premiums or otherwise, without thirty (30) days pdor wdtten notice by certified or registered mail or amendment or cancellation to the CITY, except that cancellation for non-payment of premium shall require ten (10) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail. In the event the said insurance is canceled, the CONSULTANT shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit to the CITY Clerk new evidence of insurance in the amounts established. (k) Equal Employment Opportunih/.: During the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT will not unlawfully discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, color, age, religion, sex, national origin, or physical handicap. CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated dudng empJoyment, without regard to their race, color, age, religion, sex, national odgin, or physical handicap. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notice setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of CONSULTANT, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or physical handicap. CONSULTANT will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement, provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. (I) C~JJJ~L~:E~,gB~: Except as the CITY may specify in wdting, CONSULTANT 5 ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 6 shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the CITY in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. CONSULTANT shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind the CITY to any obligation whatsoever. (m) ~: All products of consulting, with the exception of computer software developed by CONSULTANT, shall become the property of the CITY and shall be delivered to the CITY before the end of performance under this Agreement, Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, computer software remains the property of CONSULTANT, (n) ' ' ' : No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. (o) ~: The CITY may terminate this Agreement without fault on the part of CONSULTANT by giving at least ten (10) days wdtten notice to CONSULTANT. The written notice shall specify the date of termination. Upon receipt of such notice, CONSULTANT may continue services on the Project through the date of termination, provided that no service shall be commenced or continued after receipt of the notice which is not intended to protect the interest of the CITY. The CITY shall pay the CONSULTANT within thirty (30) days after the date of termination for ail non-objected to services performed by CONSULTANT in accordance herewith through the date of termination. Such termination may be effective immediately. (p) Termination of A_om~.ment for CausP.' If, through any cause, the CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this agreement, or if the CONSULTANT shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this agreement, the CITY shall have the dght to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to the CONSULTANT of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports, and other materials prepared by the CONSULTANT shall, at the option of the CITY, become property of the CITY, and the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the amounts payable under Section 6 hereinabove. ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 7 (q) Attorney's Fees: In the event that it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to bring a lawsuit or other litigation to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, a court of competent jurisdiction may determine and fix reasonably attorney's fees to be paid the prevailing party in the litigation. (r) A~: This Agreement is binding upon CITY and CONSULTANT and their successors and assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in this Agreement or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other. (s) Maintenance and In.~pection of R~.cord.~: Where the payment terms provide for compensation on a time and materials basis, CONSULTANT shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection and audit of CONSULTANT's time and materials charges under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall make such records available to the CITY at CONSULTANT's office during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records. Except as may be otherwise required by law, such records will be available only to the CITY. Such records shall be maintained by CONSULTANT for three (3) years following completion of the services under this Agreement. The CITY and the CONSULTANT agree that to the extent permitted by law, until final approval by the CITY, all data shall be treated as confidential and will not be released to third parties without the prior written consent of both parties. All plans, drawings, specifications, reports, logs, and other documents prepared by CONSULTANT in its performance under this agreement shall, upon completion of the project, be delivered to and be the property of the CITY, provided that CONSULTANT shall be entitled, at its own expense, to make copies thereof for its own use. (t) Conflict: CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official or employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of the CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of federal, state, or local law. 7 ATTACHMENT A DRAFT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Page 8 IN WITNESS THEREFORE, the CITY and the CONSULTANT have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective officers on the date first written above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSULTANT: MAYOR TITLE DATE: DATE APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 8 ATTACHMENT B ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE I. Methodology A. Methodology used: This section should clearly identify sources of all the following types of data contained in the Al. 1. Fair Housing complaint data a. HUD b. DFEH c. Fair Housing Councils/Agencies 2. Fair Housing testing data a. HUD b. Fair Housing Councils/Agencies 3. HMDA data a. Identify source of HMDA data, e.g., National Community Reinvestment Coalition ("NCRC") b. Identify software used in its analysis, e.g., HMDA Works, Center for Community Change 4. Studies, surveys, data and interviews with: a. Community based organizations b. Fair Housing organizations c. Civil rights organizations d. Government agencies that enforce fair housing laws (1) HUD (2) DOJ (3) USDA (4) DFEH (5) Attorney General of California (6) Fair Employment and Housing Commission e. Other government entities f. Nonprofit Housing Providers g. Realtors h. Lenders i. Colleges and universities j. Community planning officials k. News media I. Insurance Commission Report on Under-served communities II. Evaluation of Jurisdiction's Current Fair Housing Legal Status A. HUD Fair Housing complaints or compliance reviews B. Fair Housing discrimination suits filed by the Department of Justice C. DFEH complaints D. Fair Housing suits filed by private plaintiffs, including Fair Housing organizations E. Protected groups reporting complaints: 1. African Americans 2. Latinos, including intra-racial discrimination based on nation of origin or ancestry 3. Asians, including intra-racial discrimination based on nation of origin or ancestry 4. Whites, including intra~racial discrimination based on nation of origin or ancestry A'I-FACHMENT B ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Page 2 5. Multi-racial families or mixed race individuals 6. Families with children, including teenage boys 7. People with disabilities 8. Lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered individuals 9. Unmarried couples 10. Other groups F. Issues or allegations 1. Rental Market a. Eviction b. Refusal to rent or sell c. Failure to repair d. Different terms and conditions e. Restrictions on facilities and services f. Discriminatory rules g. Failure to make reasonable accommodations h. Failure to allow tenant financed modifications i. Credit standard j. Income standard (three times the rent) k. Source of income issues (1) Cosigner requirement (2) AFDC (3) Chile support (4) SSI I. Advertising (1) Exclusive use of foreign language signs or publications (2) "Adults Only" advertising and statements m. Special issues involving transitional housing 2. Sales Market a. Lending issues b. Insurance issues c. Realtor issues d. Architectural barriers e. Advertising f. Other sales related allegations G. Resolutions of complaints 1. Advertising changes 2. Affirmative relief 3. Changes in underwriting policies or practices 4. Class action relief 5. Community reinvestment remedies 6. Creation of housing opportunities 7. Employment opportunities 8. Mobility remedies 9. Monetary relief 10. Reasonable accommodations 1 1. Secured housing, loan, insurance or zoning change 12. Set aside units ATTACHMENT B ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Page 3 II1. Identification of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice A. Impediments Imposed by the Public Sector 1. Federal Government. Lack of clear, consistent accessibility standards, understandable by architects and builders B. Private Sector Impediments 1. Design and construction of single- and multi-family homes 2. Rehabilitation of existing housing 3. Sale of new and existing housing a. Real estate brokerage services (1) Steering based on protected classifications (2) Location and accessibility of agents, offices, e.g., language barriers, wheelchair access, hours of operation (3) Advertising (a) Online advertising may not be equally accessible (b) English only or foreign language only advertising (c) Use of "code words" (4) Blockbusting (5) Discriminatory refusal to sell or negotiate (6) Discrimination against real estate agents of a protected class (7) MLS, Language barriers b. Lending policies and practices (1) Analysis and evaluation of HMDA data (2) Analysis of CRA Compliance (a) Affirmative marketing (b) Lack of effective community reinvestment (c) Need for cooperative programs for rehabilitation or first mortgages (3) Location and closure of branches, Effect of mergers (4) Application and pre-application procedures (a) Accessibility of loan officers (b) Need for consumer credit counseling (5) Loan approval procedures (a) FICO credit scoring (b) Shift to risk-based pricing (c) Underwriting policies, e.g., 5 percent down requirement (d) Appraisal practices (e) Redlining (6) State or local bond programs (7) Sub-prime lending issues (a) Steering to prime or sub-prime products or lenders based on protected classification (b) Predatory lending (8) Foreclosure policies. Retaining properties after foreclosure and allowing them to deteriorate ATTACHMENT B ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Page 4 c. Insurance (1) Redlining (2) Advertising (3) Location of agents and offices (4) Different terms and conditions based on protected classification. Requiring more or special insurance of people with disabilities (5) Policy underwriting practices (a) Age of home (b) Geographic marketing (c) Value, replacement cost versus repair cost d. Home Owners' Associations (1) Refusals to sell or rent (2) Discriminatory rules (3) NINBY activism (4) Failure to provide reasonable accommodations or allow modifications e. Sale of houses that are uninhabitable or barely habitable (1) Lack of funds for "fixer uppers" (2) Failure of inspections to illuminate major problems 4. Rental housing a. Discrimination against families with children (1) Occupancy standards (2) Rules restricting minors' use of facilities. Intentional and adverse impact (3) Discriminatory application of rules (a) Higher secudty deposits (b) Restrictions on use of facilities (4) Harassment (5) Steering (6) Discrimination against teens of color (gang presumption) b. Discrimination against people with disabilities (1) Availability of accessible units (2) Landlords' lack of awareness of fair housing laws (3) Intentional discrimination due to prejudice, stereotyping of people with disabilities (4) Failure to provide reasonable accommodations (5) Failure to allow reasonable modifications (6) Discriminatory application of rules c. Discrimination based on other protected classifications: age, race, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, other arbitrary reasons, e.g., immigration status (1) Refusal to rent (2) Eviction, including "flipping" (3) Steering (4) Harassment (5) Advertising, e.g., Christian fish, gay pride flag CO~MUNICATIONS® Rancho C C~a~ System Upgrade 394.28 02 feet/99.05 miles MDU's Wired/ROE ~ 46 MDU's pending ROE- 35 State-of-the~A~ 870 Mhz system It's better TV. You'll See~ Services Rates ~New Va~ue Priced Packages ~Comin9 Discounted Basic Customer Service Call Center Open 24 hours/7 days a week Foothil~ Payment Center Open 6 days a week ~nsta~s and Tech Cat~s 7 days a week Events 200t o Cucamonga Founder's Day Parade GIS 2001 Festival 2001 RC's Public Library Trivia Cha!lenge Mayor's State of the T H E C I T Y O F I~ANC H 0 C IICAi~I 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SEVEN YEAR EXTENSION OF THE MOBILE HOME ACCORD WITH ALTA LAGUNA, ALTA VISTA, CASA VOLANTE, CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS, FOOTHILL MANOR, SYCAMORE VILLA AND THE PINES MOBILE HOME PARKS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a seven-year extension of the mobile home accord with the above named mobile home parks. The terms of the accord will be identical and the appendices listing amenities offered in each park will be updated to reflect current conditions in the parks. BACKGROUND The mobile home accord was put into place over ten years ago as a way to provide stability to mobile home park rents. The accord was last renewed five years ago and is set to expire in February 2002. Staff has met with representatives of the park owners and residents in negotiating this extension. With the exception of Ramona Villa, all of the mobile home park owners and resident have agreed to the extension. In the case of Ramona Villa, the owners have agreed to the extension as long as they can update the amenities list to reflect current conditions in the park. The resident's representative to the negotiations had some difficulty with this request that has yet to be resolved. It is hoped that subsequent discussions with residents from Ramona Villa will bring about a successful conclusion to the negotiations. It is hoped that an extension for this park can be considered by the City Council at an upcoming meeting. Rather than hold back agreement with the other parks in the City it was decided to deal with the Ramona Villa issue separately and allow the other agreements to be Page 2 January 16, 2002 CONSIDERATION OF SEVEN YEAR EXTENSION OF THE MOBILE HOME ACCORD WITH ALTA LAGUNA, ALTA VISTA, CASA VOLANTE~ CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS, FOOTHILL MANOR, SYCAMORE VILLA AND THE PINES MOBILE HOME PARKS brought before the City Council. It is recommended that these extensions to the Mobile Home Accord be approved. Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager 3RH 16 'OE 04:34PM COHMUHITY RSSET H6MT 989 6?30575 COMMUNITY ASS~ Z, T MA]VA CEMENT (909) 673-0777 P.o. BOX 3670, ONYARIC gA 91761 FAX: (909) 673-0776 Sanuary 16, 2002 SENT BY FAX TO 909-477-2846 Mr. Dua~e Baker City of Rancho Cucamo: tga 10500 Civic Center Dfi~ Rancho Cucamonga, C,a 91730 Dear Mr. Baker: Unfortunately I will not )e able to a~tend tonight's City Council meeting. As we have discussed o: t the telephone, the owners of Sycamore Villa are no! opposed to entering into a new A( cord, but are not prepared to sign it at this time due to some outstanding concerns they would like to resolve wifia the City's designated representatives. These c oneeras were expressed at the initial meeting of all parkowners at City Hall and have been expressed to Clay Hage of XXfMA during the negotiation process. Sycamore Villa has sig~ ed the previous versions of the Accord and we are confident that we will sign again, but x ~ould like our concern~ heard and addressed. We would welcome th~.. opportunity to meet with staff and/or the appropriate Council subcommittee to better )resent our concerns and resolve this matter as soon as possible. As we had also discuss fl on the telephone, we are willing to sign an interim extension of the Accord to cover.~ time period, not to exceed sixty days, necessary for such a meeting and any ensure discussion. Please let me know if, a have any questions on this matter or would like to schedule a meeting. Sincerely, John Davis R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~OHH~NITY ~EP. VICE$ S Repor TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner DATE: January 16, 2002 SUBJEC'r: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATF Ralph M. Lewis Park: · The contractor is completing the overhead shade structures and the concrete walkways. Restroom work is approximately 99% complete. The play equipment has been installed and the resilient surfacing material will follow. The contractor anticipates that construction will be completed by the end of January, followed by a 90-day maintenance period. Heritage Park: · Construction of the tot lot is proceeding well. The contractor has begun grading the site and will be starting equipment installation. Red Hill Park: · The Community Services Department storage building is complete. CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: · The Senior Center hosted a Senior Billiards Tournament on Friday, January 11, 2002. This double elimination tournament featured refreshments, cash prizes and great play. The tournament was limited to the first 16 participants. · The Senior Center will host the very popular Hospitality Dinner on January 16, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. Those who are new to the Center are invited free to this tasty dinner to learn about the programs and services available at the Center and it is a~so an opportunity for newcomers to make new friends. · The Senior Center will host its annual Open House on Saturday, January 26, 2002. Come see the activities and services offered at the Senior Center. Refreshments and entertainment will be provided. Festivities include a free pancake breakfast prepared by the Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club, displays highlighting various Center classes, health screenings and special features. The program is geared toward introducing new clients to the Center. · Super Bowl Party, Sunday, February 3, 2002, 3:00 p.m. Come join us at the Senior Center for Super Bowl XXXVi. There is nothing more exciting than the biggest bowl game of the year and what better way to enjoy it than with friends. Punch, popcorn and pi:~a will be provided. · Valentine's Dinner Dance, February ~). Old love, or new love, come share it at the Senior Center's Valentine Dinner and Dance. A spaghetti dinner will be enjoyed and the music of the big bands will be played. All of this is courtesy of the Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC). TRAC will act as hosts, cooks, servers and D.J. Again this year, the program promises to be a great intergenerational affair. · Valentine's Party, Thursday, February 14, 2002. Please join us for fun with cupid and his celebration on Valentine's Day. This event is the perfect opportunity to express your love for friends and family. There will be special entertainment and refreshments provided. · New officers for the V.I.P. CJub were installed on Thursday, January 3, 2002. Don Carroll will serve this next year as the Club's President. · The Mission room was recently painted for spruce-up during the holiday period. Thanks to the public works crew for their quality job. · A new Stretchino Class will be introduced each Wednesday, beginning in January. · The next meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee will be held on Monday, January 28, 2002, at g:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Three new members will be appointed at this meeting. Human Services: · Alzheimer's Workshop - The Alzheimer's Association presented a free workshop on 'What is Memory' on January 11,2002, 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. -2- CITY COUNCIl. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 · The Arthritis Foundation will present a 7-week self help workshop on Fibromyalgia. The classes are designed to teach people how to take a more active role in their health cere. It will offer information on pain control, relaxation, exercise, fatigue and depression. The workshop will run from January 15 through February 20, 200 g:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. $15.00 material fee. Registration is required. · The Braille Institute will offer a ten-week series of classes designed to teach blind and visually impaired seniors how to live with the loss of vision. The classes will cover magnificefion devices, talking books and other adaptive devices for the visuelly impaired. The series of classes will be held at the Senior Center every Tuesday from 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. beginning January 8, 2002. · Blindness Suooort Services and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center have joined forces to offer An Independent Living Skills Program. The program consists of a series of classes to help blind 'and visually impaired seniors learn daily living skills. Topics will include money management, closet and drawer organization, telling time, telephone skills, cleaning, grocery shopping and personal hygiene. The classes will be held at the Senior Center every Monday from 1:00 - 4:00 p.m. beginning January 28, 2002. · The Department of Aging and Adult Services will provide a presentation on the services they offer to the senior population in the west end region of San Bemardino County. Date and time to be announced. · The Alzheimer's Association will present a free workshop on "Caragiver Stress" February 8, 2002, 10:00 a.m. Walk ins are welcome. · Elder Law Counseling is available at no cost to seniors who are seeking legal advice. Attorney Gregory Wood is available by appointment only on the 2°d Fdday of the month from 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. Trips and Tours: · Downtown Disney - January 19. We'll get you there then you're on your own to enjoy one of Disney's newest attractions. Tucked between Disneyland and California Adventure, Downtown Disney offers fabulous food, great entertainment, and shops galore featuring the "Wodd of Disney" store - the second largest collection of Disney merchandise. Cost is $14 per person. · J. Paul Getty Museum - February 16. The Getty Center tour begins with a tram ride to the summit, taking in unexpected views of the historic Sepulveda Pass. At the museum you can watch a brief orientation film. From there you are free to experience all the Getty has to offer at your own pace. Cost is $17 per person. · Indio National Date Festival - February 23. Come and enjoy the celebration of the end of the harvest. Take in all the exotic date exhibits not to mention all the displays of fine art, woodcerving, gems and minerals, crafts and flowers. Try your luck at the camel and ostrich races. Enjoy great food, entertainment, carnival ddes, and everything that is date. Cost is $31 per person. -3- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COA~MUNtTY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 · Solvang - March 20. Step into this quaint Danish village and enjoy all the sighl~, sounds, and scents that surround you. Enjoy the day at your leisure to explore the 8cendinavian import shops and bakeries of Solvang. Cost is $24 per person. · Cadsbad Flower Fields - April 30. Nestled high on the hillside overlooking the Pacific Ocean, the flower fields at Cadsbad Rsnch bloom annually into a 50-acra rainbow of brigh! ranunculus flowers. We'll ~ke a guided tour with a wagon ride through the fields. You can shop, have lunch (on your own) or mine for gemstones, there's something for everybody. We'll conclude the tdp with a stop at the Carlsbad Company Stores for shopping and lunch (on your own). Cost is $28 per person. Volunteer Services: · The volunteer program is expanding-its recruitment into the business community with the Communily Partnership Program. Several Chamber of Commerce businesses have shown interest in volunteering for upcoming special events. The table below summarizes CSD volunteer usage for the month of November, 2001: MONTH: November 2001 YEAR TO DATE if of if of Hours $ Value if of if of Hours $ Value Volunteers Volunteers Administration 5 15 $210 55 138 $1,932 Sports 116 740 $10,360 2,066 25,461 $356,454 Senior and 71 297 $4,158 659 2,566.5 $35,931 Human Services Special 76 364 5,096 225 954 $13,356 Events Youth 62 213 2,982 297 1,778 $23,772 Programs Total 330 1,629 22,806 33,02 30,898 $431,445 'D~llar value based ¢~n $14.00 per hour. Teens: · The Teen Recreation Activity Club's (TRAC) twice-monthly babysitting service "Night on the Town" is going strong and is usually at capacity. Over 30 TRAC teens participated in our annual Founders Day Parade and Celebration selling hot dogs, snacks and beverages to participants as one of their many fundraiser's for the year. TRAC Babysitting Workshop will be held on Saturday, January 19. -4- CiTY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 · Maqic Mountain field Trip: 24 teens went on a fun filled trip to Magic Mountain on Saturday, December 15, 200t. The teens had a lot of fun at the park and were able to go on many rides due to the Iow a{~endance this time of year. · The Teen Workshop Series continues with High School - Budget Workshop on Thursday March t4, 2002. This workshop assists teens with addressing issues on how to budget for college, new car and a computer. This class will also highlight just how much money it would take for teens to live on their own. · Spectacular Super Bowl Sunday for teens will be held at the Teen Center on february 3, 2002, from 2:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. (approximately). Teens will have an opportunity to view the big game on our large screen TV with their friends. Snacks and beverages will be available for the teens. Admission to this fun event will be $2.00 per person. · Our annual Teen Valentine Dance will be on february t6, 2002 in our RC family Sport Center. The dance will st8r{ at 7:00 p.m. and will continue until 10:00 p.m. at a cost of $3 in advance and $§ at the door. Teens will be able to dance the night away along with receiving free hearts and many other Valentine give-a-ways. Souvenir pictures will be available for at a cost of $1.50 for each picture. · Our new program Teen Connection grant program is operating on the local high school campuses. This program will allow high school students to sign up for volunteer opportunities with city programs. The program operates during school lunch hours on the following days: Tuesdays - Etiwanda High School; Wednesdays - Rancho Cucamonga High School; and Thursdays - Alta Loma High School. Youth Activities: · Playschool classes resumed on January 7th. Enrollment for the winter quarter is 565. · The annual Breakfast with Santa was held on December 8, 2001at the Senior Center. The Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club provided pancakes, sausage and juice for ail the youngsters visiting Santa. Over 300 tickets sold for the event, which was a sell out. Participants were able to have breakfast with Santa, sit and talk with Santa, make crafts, entertainment and listen to festive music. The event was a huge success. · The Mobile Recreation Program Fun on the Run is going strong. The program served over 611 youth for the month of November and par{ of December. The Recreation Unit continue to go to the following park sites Monday through Friday from 2:30 p.m. until 5:00 p.m.: Monday, Bear Gulch Park, Tuesday, Old Town Park, Wednesday, Hermosa Park, Thursday, Mountain View Park, Friday Windrows Park. · Youth Enrichment Services (YES) grant program is going strong at Mulberry Leaming Center. For the month of November, we served over 875 residents. Over the next month there will be over 15 classes offered at no cost to parents of newborn to 5 year old children. Our new FACTS Center is now open at Lions East Community Center and our Grand Opening will be held on February 4th time to be announced. -5- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 · Skate Park - Usage of the skate facility for the last month are estimated at 1,375 participants. There were many cold, rainy days that affected the participation numbers this past month. The next skate demonstration and safety clinic is scheduled for May 11, 2002. Classes: · Contract classes started back up the second week in January. We have many new classes this quarter including stamp therapy (a rubber-stamping class), film and 'IV acting workshop, commercial hip hop, scrape booking, a card making. Youth Sports: · The Sports Advisory Committee meeting for the month of January was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. The next meeting is scheduled for Apdl 11, 2002. The field request materials for the Fall/Winter 2002 (August 1 through January 31, 2003) will be due at this meeting. · The table below summarizes vouth sr)orts activities for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Soccer 275 3-5/boys & girls 22 Roller Hockey 150 6-13/boys & girls 16 Youth Basketball 950 6-15/boys & girls 122 Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit organized youth sport leagues. For the reporting period, 12 sport groups utilized 18 city parks and had 60,964 participants and 101,470 spectators. RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides dromin/oDen play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # Participants Adult Basketball 921 Youth Basketball 956 Adult Racquetball 361 Youth Racquetball 57 Adult Volleyball 45 Youth Volleyball 79 Jazzercise 981 Adult Sports: · The table on the next page summarizes adult sports activities for men and women for the reporting period: -6- Cl~ COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 Activity # Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,304 144 Male/Female Flag Football 100 10 Male Tennis28 N/A Male/Female · Four adult softball tournaments are scheduled for the month of January 2002 at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex. Community Wide Special Events: · The following calendar provides a listing of the Department's upcoming special events for the year 2002. Event Date Time Location Harvest Tuesdays TBA TBA 'rBA Teens - Job Skills Workshop TBA TBA Lions West Community Center Teens - Education Funding TBA TBA Lions West Community Workshop Center Seniors - Pool Tournament January 11,2002 9:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - Hospitality Dinner January 16, 2002 5:00 p.m. Senior Center Teens - Babysitting Workshop January 19, 2002 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon Lions West Community Center Seniors - Senior Center Open January 26, 2002 8:30 a.m. (pancake Senior Center House breakfast) 10:00 a.m. Event Seniors - Super Bowl Party February 3, 2002 1:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Senior Center Teens - Super Bowl Party February 3, 2002 2:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Teen Center (Appmximately) Seniors - Valentine's Dinner February 9, 2002 12 noon Senior Center and Dance Seniors - Valentine's Day Party February 14. 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Teens - Valentine's Dance February 16, 2002 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Seniors - Roman Banquet March 1, 2002 5:00 p.m. Senior Center Teens - Budgeting Workshop March 14. 2002 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. Lions West Community Center Seniors - St. Patrick's Day Party March 14, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Teens - Career Expo March 21,2002 6:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Rancho Cucemonga Family Sports Center Seniors - Golden Follies Talent March 23, 2002 2:00 p.m. Montclair Community Showcase Center Kids Fest March 30, 2002 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Red Hill Community Park Seniors - Fine Art Show April 6, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - Pool Tournament April 12, 2002 9:00 a.m. Senior Center Youth - Track Meet /N3ri113, 2002 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Rancho Cucarnonga High Youth - Car Seat Safety Check April 13, 2002 10:00 a.m.- 1:00 p.m. TBA Seniors - Spring Fling Event April 18, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center -7- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 Event Date Time Location Seniors -VIP Parking Lot Sale April 27, 2002 6:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Senior Center Teens - Skate Demo & Safety May, 2002 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Clinic (exact date - TBA) Facility Seniors - Cinco de Mayo Event May 3, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center ¢inco de Mayo May 4, 2002 TBA Old Town Park Seniors - Mother's Day Brunch/Tea May 11,2002 11:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - Hospitality Dinner May 15, 2002 5:00 p.m. Senior Center Seniors - VIP Card Party May 18, 2002 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Senior Center Youth - Playschool Graduation June 6, 2002 6:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Red Hill Community Park Seniors- International Cuisine June 7, 2002 6:00 p.m. Senior Center Dinner Seniors - Independence Day June 27, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Event Concerts in the Park July & August 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Red Hill Community Park (Thursdays) Movies in the Park July & August Dusk Monday - Milliken Park Monday/ Wednesday - Windrows Wednesday/Friday Friday - Red Hill Park 4~" of July Fireworks & Celebration July 4, 2002 5:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Chaffey College Seniors - Pool Tournament July 12, 2002 9:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - Ice Cream Social & July 18, 2002 1:30 p.m. Senior Center Game Show Seniors - Antique Road Show August 10, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - Hoe Down Event August 22, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors- VIP Picnic September 19, 2002 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p,m. Red Hill Community Park Teens - Knott's Scary Farm Trip October 5, 2002 5:00 p.m. - 3:00 a.m. Knott's Berry Farm Seniors - Pool Tournament October 11,2002 9:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - VIP Fashion Show October 12, 2002 9:00 a.m. Senior Center Teens - College Fair October 17, 2002 6:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Teens - Legacy of Hope October 21, 2002 TBA Etiwanda High School Youth - Pumpkin Carving October 26, 2002 9:30 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Red Hill Community Park Workshop 11:00 a.m. - 12 noon Seniors - Flu Clinic & Health Fair October 26, 2002 9:00 a.m. Senior Center Teens - Monster Bash Dance October 26, 2002 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Seniors - Halloween October 31,2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Spooktacular Event Skate Park Demo & Safety November, 2002 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Spruce Avenue Park Skate Clinic (exact date - TBA) Facility Seniors - Veteran's Day Program November 7, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Founders Day Parade and November 9, 2002 Parade: 9:30 a.m. Parade: Base Line Road Celebration Celebration: 10:00 a.m, Celebration: Red Hill 2:00 p.m. Community Park Seniors - Crafty Seniors Craft Sale November 16, 2002 9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Senior Center Seniors - Thanksgiving Dinner November 21,2002 1:00 p.m. ! Senior Center Tree Lighting Ceremony December 5, 2002 TBA ; Terra Vista Town Center (Tentative) Youth - Breakfast with Santa December 14, 2002 8:00 a.m. & 9:00 a.m. Senior Center and 10:00 a.m. -8- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 Event Date Time Loc~_t_J _hn Seniors - VIP Christmas Dinner December 15, 2002 11:00 a.m. Senior Center Seniors - Holiday Event December 19, 2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Teens - Magic Mountain Trip December 21,2002 8:00 a.m. - 7:30 p.m. Magic Mountain Seniors - New Year's Event December 31,2002 10:00 a.m. Senior Center Key: TBA = To be announced. Cultural and Performing Arts: · The Sound of Music will be presented at the Alta Loma High School Theater in April 2002. Youngsters, ages 8-20 are invited to audition for this exciting spring production. Auditions will take place on January 26t~ for 8-11 year olds and on January 27t' for 12-20 year olds. This production offers the youth of the community the opportunity to work with a professional director and artistic staff. All rehearsals will include educational workshops on theater auditioning, acting, singing and much more. The performers will also be working with professional sets, costumes, sound and lighting. Parks and Facilities: · The table below provides information on park reservations for the month of December 2001: Shelter Location Attendance # of Number Hours of Use Applications Processed Rentals Red Hill 546 6 Resident 9 35 Community Park Heritage Community 20 1 Resident I 2 Park Hermosa Park 60 2 Resident 2 6 Coyote Canyon Park 0 0 Resident 0 0 Civic Center * * * * Courtyard Total 626 9 Resident 12 43 · NO rantals due to scheduled construction. Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Eauestrian Center usage for the months of January/February 2002 is shown in the table below. Group Date Event/Time Frame Alta Loma Riding Club January 3r~ Board Meeting/7:30-9:30 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club January 27t~ Schooling Show/8.a.m.-5 p.m. 4-H Club January 28t~ General Meeting/7:00-9 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club February 7t~ Board Meeting/7:30-9:30 p.m. 4-H Club February 10~ Valentine's Horse Show/7a.m.-5:00 p.m. 4-H Club February 25~ General Meeting/7:00-9:00 p.m. -9- CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JANUARY 16, 2002 Park and Recreation Commission: · The Park and Recreation Commission did not meet during the month of December due to the holidays. · At the January 17, 2002 Commission meeting the following items will be acted upon/discussed: · Election of Officers. · Review and evaluation of the Founder's Day Parade. · Discussion regarding member's participation in the CPRS conference to be held April 3-6, 2002, in Los Angeles. · Presentation of the results from the Performing Arts Center/Library Feasibility Study. · Review and evaluation of Harvest Tuesdays. · Update on the status of the Community Services Network. · Sports Advisory Committee update. · Senior Advisory Committee update. · Design of handicap ramp at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Adult Sports Complex. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The Community Foundation did not meet during the month of December 2001, due to the holidays. · At the January 8, 2002, Foundation meeting the following items were discussed: · Approval of renewal of Directors and Officers Liability Insurance for 2002. · Consideration of disbursement of funds in the James V. Curatalo Memorial fund account. · Review of the 2001 Founder's Night Gala Sponsor and Ambassador recognition program. · Presentation of the results from the Performing Arts Center/Library Feasibility Study. · Consideration of the Quarterly Report of the Community Foundation's Action Planning Steps. · Consideration of setting a date and time for the Foundation's Annual Strategic Planning Workshop. Rancho Cucarnonga Epicenter: · Staff is working with the following organizations for future/tentative bookings at the Epicenter: · County Fire Chiefs/County Training Officers - Epicenter Stadium - Multi-casualty Incident Training - January 22, 23 and 25th, 2002. · California Association of School Transportation Officials - Epicenter Special Event Area - School Bus Roadeo - March 16 & 17, 2002. · Abundant Living Family Church - Epicenter Stadium - Easter Services - March 30 & 31, 2002. · American Cancer Society - Epicenter Adult Sports Fields - Relay for Life - April 20 & 21, 2002. (Tentative) · RC Quakes - Epicenter Stadium - Post Game Friendship Rally - May 5, 2002. -10- CiTY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE .JANUARY 16, 2002 · Nashville Connection - Epicenter Stadium - Country Westem Concert - May 17 & 18, 2002. (Tentative) · Daily Bulletin - Epicenter Stadium - All Stars Game - June 3 & 4, 2002. · Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation - June 12, 2002. · Mt. High Entertainment - Epicenter Stadium - summer concert series. (Tentative) Kevin"McArdle Community Services Director City Engineer hlCOMMSERV~Council&Boards~CityCouncil~StaffReportst2OO2~update l. 16.02. d0c -11- T H E C I T Y O F ]~ANCHO CUCAH ONGA Slaff Report DATE: January 16, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST BackRround This matter has been continued from the January 2, 2002 City Council Meeting. Staff has communicated with Mr. Knox regarding the questions the City Council raised at the January 2, 2002 meeting. In response to that, Mr. Knox provided the attached materials. Mr. Knox has been advised that this matter will be on tonight's agenda and it is anticipated that he will be present to answer questions or provide additional input. Britt W. Wilson Management Analyst III City Manager's Office Attachments: 1. Draft City Resolution of Support for Inland Empire Airports First 2. Additional materials provided by Mr. Knox H:\CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTS\INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST JAN 2, 2002.doc '-//5 DRAFT CITY RESOLUTION Resolution No. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF "INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST" WHEREAS, the Southern California area including Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties is served by more commercial airports than any other major metropolitan area in United States; and WHEREAS, available Southern California Airports include: Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, Ontario International Airport, Orange County Airport, Palmdale Airport, March GlobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, and Palm Springs Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, the greatest population growth in Southern California during the coming centuries will occur in the Inland Empire Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, and Orange County Airport aro all located in highly urbanized areas where environmental concerns and community resistance may make further expansion difficult; and WHEREAS, Inland Empire Airports, which include March GlobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, Ontario International Airport and Palm Springs Regional aro well located to serve future Southern California aviation needs and have groat unused capacity; and WHEREAS, communities near Inland Empire Airports are supportive of their airports and would greatly benefit from the increased use of those facilities; and WHEREAS, increasing freeway traffic into Orange and LA Counties may make ground access to coastal airports extremely difficult, and attempts to mitigate the surface access challenges to these airports may siphon off discretionary state transportation dollars that otherwise would be used to solve traffic challenges in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga favors and supports the development, expansion and utilization of well located aviation facilities available in the Inland Empire; and. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the undersigned agrees that future growth in Southern California air traffic should first be directed to airports where neighboring communities are supportive; and Resolution No. 02- Page 2 of __ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is good public policy to first direct air traffic to Inland Empire Airports with excess capacity rather than spending billions of dollars to expand capacity in other highly populated areas and to encourage and foster development of airports in the Inland Empire. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ,2002. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2002. Executed this day of ,2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Britt Wilson H:\RESOLUTIONS~RESOLUTION - Inland Empire First 01-02-02,doc ADDITIONAL MATERIALS PROVIDED BY MR. KNOX [Additional Information provided by Mr. Knox responding to questions raised by the City Council at the January 2, 2002 Council meeting] · Inland Empire Airports First is an informal coalition of Inland Empire governments, transportation and planning organizations as well as private business groups who are interested in promoting the economic development opportunities that come from the development and expansion of Inland Empire airports. The position is very simple - develop and expand Inland Empire airports before airports in LA and Orange Counties. · If the State is going to spend money on transportation infrastructure to support airports in Southern California, we believe it should be spent on projects in the Inland Empire first. · Leaders in this effort include Mr. Robert Wolf, Past Chairman of the California Transportation Commission and former Undersecretary for State Transportation, Business and Housing, under Governor Pete Wilson. · Leadership? o Please note that at this time, the bulk of support for this issue comes out of Riverside County even though 3 out of the 5 major Inland Empire Airports are in San Bernardino County. That's leadership. o With a predicted growth rate that will add nearly 2 million people to the Inlar~d Empire in the next 20 years, the residents of San Bernardino County would benefit greatly by the job growth created by the development and expansion of Inland Empire airports. That's leadership. · HK&A is an Industrial development firm based in Moreno Valley. HK&A is a partner in the development team that is developing an air cargo facility at Mach Field. I am an industrial developer with an interest in the successful economic development of not only March but the region as a whole. · Four generations of my family live in the Inland Empire and have been active supporters of the economic advancement of this region for many years. I represent the Inland Empire at a national level through my involved in NAIOP and at the State level at the California Business Properties Assoc. The bulk of this involvement has benefited the west end of San Bernardino County much more them any one project that I have a vested interest in. · Please note that the Inland Empire Economic Partnership, an organization tasked with the mission to promote economic growth in our region, pasted a position in support of the issue as did NAIOP Inland Empire Chapter, the trade association for the commercial real estate industry. · The City of Montclair is also considering a position that supports the development and expansion of Inland Empire airports before airports in Orange and LA Counties. · The Council is not being asked to join anything but a growing list of Inland Empire Governments, Transportation and Planning Agencies as well as private business groups who have adopted a position in support of airports in the Inland Empire over airports in LA and Orange Counties. z-/2 "INLAND EMPIRE AIRPOR TS FIRS T" Following is a growing list of Inland Empire governments, transportation and planning organizations and business groups who have joined this important regional effort and adopted a position in support of Inland Empire ~4irports First. Resolutions Received as of 12/2 7/01 1. Riverside County Board of Supervisors 2. Riverside County Transportation Commission 3. Western Riverside Council of Governments 4. March Joint Powers Authority $. City of Beaumont 6. City of Fontana 7. City of Hemet 8. City of Lake Elsinore 9. City of Moreno Valley 10. City of Perris 11. City of Riverside 12. City of Temecula 13. City of Victorville , 14. Economic Council of Pass Area Communities 15. Hemet/San Jacinto Action Group 16. Inland Empire Economic Partnership 17. Valley Group 18. Banning Chamber of Commerce 19. Beaumont Chamber of Commerce 20. Fontana Chamber of Commerce 21. Greater Riverside Chambers of Commerce 22. National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, Inland Empire Chapter 1 q21 "Inland Empire Airports First" Southern Califomia is served by more airports than any other metropolitan area in the United States. The Inland Empire counties of Riverside and San Bernardino are host to five (5) major airports; Ontario Intemational, Palm Springs Intemational, San Bernardino International, Southern California Logistics and March Inland Port. According to the U.S. Census, San Bemardino & Riverside counties' current population of 3.25 million is greater than that of 20 states. Even SCAG's most conservative forecast shows that by 2020 the Inland Empire's population will grow by 1.83 million. This is a rate faster than LA county and faster than Orange, Ventura, Imperial, and San Diego counties combined. The Inland Empire's population growth will exceed that of 47 states by 2020 with only California, Texas and Florida adding more people. The SCAG research on air passenger demand predicts an enormous increase from the Inland Empire over the next 20 years. Annual air passenger volume will climb from 6.7 million to 43.4 million. An increasing share of the Southern California's industrial space is now in the Inland Empire. The Inland Empire has more industrial space than Orange County and 25% of the amount built in L.A. County since World War II. CA Employment Development Department shows the Inland Empire's economy currently supporting over 1 million jobs. According to SCAG, including the self-employed, the Inland Empire will expand to a 1.8 million job economy by 2020. SCAG's research also shows the Inland Empire's annual demand for air cargo services soaring to over 5 million tons within the next 20 years. Demands from the Inland Empire will be more than double today's LAX air cargo volume. However, the lack of air cargo and limited passenger service in the Inland Empire means a growing number of tracks and cars on freeways to coastal airports, increased traffic congestion throughout Southern California and increased air pollution due to traffic stuck on already congested freeways. Airline executive inertia appears to be the major barrier to getting airlines to expand flights into the Inland Empire. It is clearly in the airlines self interest to expand their existing facilities and not expand inland. This phenomenon, to a great extent, puts regional transportation and land use planning in the 1 hands of the airlines. By concentrating their flights at only a few major airports, the airlines are forcing Southern California to pay an increasing price for ground transportation infrastructure. Expanding LAX or building a new E1 Toro airport will increase freeway traffic into Orange and LA Counties and drive Southern California's traffic congestion to unmanageable levels, crippling the Inland Empire's economic development advantages. Attempts to mitigate the surface access challenges for expanded capacity at costal county airports will siphon off critical transportation dollars that are needed to solve ground access and traffic challenges in the support and expansion of Inland Empire Airports. California's economic and political leaders are only vaguely aware of the Inland Empire's growing power. Here is an issue on which the leadership of the Inland Empire must take a stand. We should join together to oppose the expansions of LAX and Orange County airports until a full range of Inland Empire air passenger and air cargo flights are available. The leadership in both Riverside and San Bernardino counties must work together as one region to make the development and expansion of Inland Empire Airports the first priority when considering Southern California's long-term transportation needs. Only the collective strength of the two counties will ensure the Inland Empire's future quality of life and economic viability. 2 dailybulletln.com Page 1 of 3 [] dailybulletin.com AUTOMOTIVE · REAL ESTATE · CLASSIFIEDS · CAREERS · NEIGHBORHOODS · SHOPLINK · CONTACT US · SEARCH NEWS INDEX FRO.TP^OE Group backs inland airports NEWS · Local News · Daily Obituaries Published Sunday, December 23, 2001 12.'00:00 AM · Obituary Search · Opinion · Columnists SPORTS By CHRIS EHRLICH BUSINESS LIVING CLASSIFIEDS STAFF WRITER NEIGHBORHOODS ENTERTAINMENT T,.,FF,c Coalition hopes to enlist support AUTOMOTIVE JOBS REAL ESTATE A Moreno Valley businessman wants Inland Valley cities to join an informal MARKETPLACENEWSPAPER ADS political coalition calling for the expansion or construction of Inland Empire SPECIAL SECTIONS airports. FEATURES SERVICESHELP?iNFO The movement, Inland Empire Airports First, is prompted by the daunting [] Enel SEARCH ARCHIVES population growth expected in San Bernardino and Riverside counties over the ADVERTISING next 20 years. MOBILE DEVICES Spearheaded by Aaron Knox, 39, of Corona, the coalition is backed by various [] dailybulletin.com businesses and political agencies, including the city of Fontana and the Fontana Energy C - avantgo Energ,~ Chamber of Commerce. ] Motr dailybulletin.com "Where are we going to be as a region if we continue to be treated like an goes mobile unwanted stepchild by the more urbanized counties like Orange County and Los Angeles," Knox said. "We're considered at the end of a dusty road by a lot of SUBSCRIBE officials in Los Angeles and Orange counties, and when regional planning Subscribe to the Inland efforts are under way, the Inland Empire is often not given the full consideration Mote Valley Daily Bulletin newpaper that is deserved." click here [] E T~' Knox and the movement want regional airports in the Inland Empire expanded or built before those in Orange County and Los Angeles. Knox himself is a principal of Harley Knox & Associates Inc., a Moreno Valley developer of offices E TI- and industrial properties and part of the development team for March Inland Port. [] Car~ Knox stressed that the region must plan for inevitable population growth that will lead to an increased demand for airport services. He said that, according to the Southern California Association of Governments, Care population growth expected in the region - 1.83 million new people by 2020 - is more than in Los Angeles County and more than in Orange, Ventura, Imperial [] and San Diego counties combined. Dini~ Our Io, Knox wants to add more Inland Valley cities to his list of 21 agencies that have Dini given formal statements of support for Inland Empire Airports First. Knox made presentations earlier this month to the city councils of Rancho file://C:\W1NNT\Temporary%20Intemet%20Files\ 12-21-01 dailybulletin.htm 1/8/2002 dailybullctln.com Page 2 of 3 Cucamogna and Montclair asking them to pass formal resolutions of support for the movement. The Rancho Cucamonga and Montclair city councils are both reviewing Knox's proposal. The councils are considering putting a resolution of support for Inland Empire Airports First on their agendas some time in 2002. Rancho Cucamonga City Councilman Bob Dutton and Montclair City Councilman Bill Ruh were in favor of passing resolutions of support for the movement after hearing Knox's presentation. Knox said that he would like to make presentations on the movement to other area cities such as Ontario and Upland. He plans to deliver a "united front of support" for the Inland Empire Airports First in Mamh to the Southern California Airport Authority, the Federal Aviation Administration and airlines. Knox added that the movement is partially in response to the priority SCAG gives to airports in Los Angeles and Orange counties in its regional aviation planning. SCAG spokesman Jeff Lustgarten said that the agency does not give any county priority in its regional planning. Lustgarten added that SCAG's regional aviation strategy would basically "constrain" LAX to its existing facilities. SCAG's aviation strategy would also "encourage" growth and development of "new airport capacity" in Orange County and the Inland Empire, particularly at ONT, as well as at March Inland Port and San Bernardino International, Lustgarten said. There are five major airports in the region: ONT; Palm Springs International; San Bernardino International; Southern California Logistics and March Inland Port. Bob Wolf, former chairman of the California Transportation Commission and undersecretary for transportation under former California Gov. Pete Wilson, is an advocate of Inland Empire Airports First. "It is incumbent upon the Inland Empire to band together, with no particular specificity as to which Inland Empire airport to support, but to support them all, in order to make a case for increased funding in the area of growth, which is the Inland Empire," Wolf said. "Those who know have a great fear -I will be so bold as to say - that these finite resources (transportation funds) will go outside the Inland Empire if we don't make our case and raise our voices," Wolf said. "There's no mystery ... there's no hidden agenda." Chris Ehdich can be reached by e-mail at c_ehrlich@dailybulletin.com or by phone at (909) 483-9347. II Top of page II file ://C :\WINNrlSTemporary%20Intemet%20Files\ 12-21-01 dailybulletin.htm 1/8/2002 Aaron Knox Aaron Knox is Vice President of Harley Knox and Associates, Inc., a real estate development and consulting firm with offices in Moreno Valley, CA. In the past twelve years he has been involved in all facets of commercial and industrial land development as well as large public works projects, specializing in the local government land-use entitlement process. Aaron is also the Principle Consultant with TMG Communications, Inc. successfully providing public/government affairs, strategic communications and grassroots management programs for municipal, utility, land-use and corporate clients throughout the Inland Empire of Southern California. Aaron has consulted and managed dozens of political campaigns at the federal, state and local levels. He is an active member of the American Association of Political Consultants and is regarded as an effective local political strategist and fundraiser. Aaron serves as Government Affairs Chairman and a is a two-term Past- President for the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP), Inland Empire Chapter as well as serves on NAIOP's National Board of Directors and National Committee for State and Local Government Affairs. He is also an active member of the California Business Property Owners Association serving on the legislative affairs Committee. For the past twelve years, Aaron has been active in numerous civil, political and economic development organizations throughout the Inland Empire. With a focus on the economic advancement of the Inland Empire, Aaron Knox brings together a diverse background of civic, political and business experiences, giving him the ability to craft effective solutions for complex regional and local challenges.