HomeMy WebLinkAbout656 - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 656
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUBAREA
18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 TO AMEND PLANNING
AREA VI TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT A DENSITY RANGE OF 24 TO 30 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH
STREET, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-082-46.
A. RECITALS.
1. Fairfield Development filed an application for Subarea 18 Specific Plan
Amendment 00-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Ordinance, the subject Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 28th day of March 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
recommended approval of said application.
3. On May 2, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on May 2, 2001, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to property within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the
environment; and
c. The proposed amendment is consistent with the flexible land use
concept of the Mixed Use zoning designation of the Subarea 18 Specific
Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Ordinance No. 656
Page 2 of 10
a. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
Subarea 18 Specific Plan or the General Plan, and will provide for the
logical development of Planning Area VI; and
b. The amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Subarea 18
Specific Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Subarea
18 Specific Plan and the purposes of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan; and
e. The proposed amendment is consistent with key land use objectives
identified in the General Plan including; encouraging opportunities to mix
different but compatible land uses and activities, promote land use
patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation, and
organize land uses to promote the maximal opportunity for transit usage;
and
f. The inclusion of multi-family residential land use for Planning Area VI will
provide an integrated environment that will respond to evolving market
conditions, and will help to create a City that functions efficiently, is
exciting to live in, and makes the best use of its various resources
pursuant to the objectives of the General Plan.
4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master
EIR for the Rancho Cucamcnga Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21157.1 provides that the preparation
and certification of a Master EIR allows for the limited review of subsequent
projects that were described in the Master EIR as being within the scope of the
reporting accordance with certain requirements; however, because of the
changes that are submitted by this project, an Addendum was prepared for said
project. An Addendum to the Subarea 18 Specific Plan Final EIR is appropriate
documentation, because some changes or additions are necessary to describe
the proposed residential project, but none of the conditions described in the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR
have occurred. The City Council has reviewed and considered the attached
Addendum based on the following findings:
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require
major revisions to the previous EIR because of new significant
environmental effects, or a substantial increase in severity of previously
identified significant effects.
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the
cimumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require
major revisions to the previous EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects.
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not
known, and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable
diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of
the following: 1 ) the project will have one or more significant effects not
discussed in the previous EIR; 2) significant effects previously examined
Ordinance No. 656
Page 3 of 10
will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 3)
mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible,
would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or
alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the
final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on
the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measures or alternative.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment No.
00-04, as shown in the Staff Report and attached Exhibit "A," as well as any
related text, tables, figures, and maps to maintain consistency subject to each
and every Condition set forth below:
Planninq Division
1. Within 45 days of the City Council approval, or prior to
issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, a
revised plan text and graphics, including all
renumbered pages within affected sections, shall be
submitted to the City Planner for review and approval.
Upon acceptance by the City P~anner, a total of 25,
3-hole punched copies of the revised plan shall be
submitted for distribution to the City Council, the
Planning Commission, Library, and staff. In addition,
one unbound original, and one executable copy in
Microsoft Word file format on a 3.5-inch iBM
formatted diskette shall be submitted.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2001.
AYES: Alexander, Biane Curatalo, Dutton, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
Willi~exander, Mayor
Ordinance No. 656
Page 4 of 10
ATI'EST:
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2nd day of May 2001, and was passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of May 2001.
Executed this 17th day of May 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
D~s,~M~:, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 656
Page 5 of 10
FF DEVELOPMENT L.P. T¢lcphon¢(858)457-2123
Facsimile (858) 457-1121
September 26, 2000
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Empire Lakes-Parcel 6 Project Description
The below text describes the proposed amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area
Specific Plan (IASP) Sub-Area 18, Planning Area VI. This amendment is proposed to allow
multiple family residential development in Planning Area VI as a permitted use.
This amendment to Sub-Area 18, planing Area VI has been prepared in conjunction with an
Site Location
Planning Area VI of the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is located north of Fourth Street, east
of the Empire Lakes Golf Course, west of Pianalng Area VII, and south of the Fifth Street
extension.
Amendments to IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan
The following amendments arc applicable to thc IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan to allow
multiple family residential development as an additional permitted use within Planning Area VI.
Section 1.4
PLANNING AREA VI - OFFICE USES/BUSINESS PARK/MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
This planning area is approximately 23 acres and includes the greatest amount of golf course
footage of any planning area within the Sub-Area 18. The summary land use matrix identifies a
variety of uses that are compatible with the golf course including: indoor
recreation/entertainment; restaurant; mixed use commercial; hotel/conference center;
office/commercial; multiple family residential; and research and development/light industrial;
and business park.
TABLE 1-1 and TABLE 4-1 (SUMMARY OF LAlqD USE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) a~ arn~nded to
include Multiple Family Residential for Planning Area VI with a Maximum Development
Potential of 690 residential units and a density of 24-30 dn/ac.
Section 4.2 Land Use Plan
SOUTHEASTERN ANCHOR (Fourth Strut and Millicent Avenue)
Planning Area VI: · Office/Commercial
· Multiple Farnil¥ Residential
This planning area has both visibility from fourth Street and extensive golf course amenity
frontage. It is envisioned to be a campus-style office/business park or a multinle family
residential development capitalizing on the golf course amenity. This parcel is also a potential
Ordinance No. 656
Page 6 of 10
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Scptcmber 26, 2000
Page 2
TABLE 5-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY PLANNING AREA is amended to include
Multiple Family Residential as a Permitted (P) use in Planning Area VI.
TABLE 5-2 LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS is amended to include RESIDENTIAL use types
with the following sub-category:
High Residential Density
High density residential development with a density of up to 30 dwelling units per gross
acre. Development shall be compatible with surrounding uses.
Section 5.3 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
Planning Area VI High Density Residential Site Development Standards
Residential uses in Planning Area VI shall comply with Chapter 17.08 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code for the High Residential District (H) zone, except as modified
below:
A. Table 17.08.040-D - Street scape Setback Standards:
Minimum building setback along Fourth Street for multiple family residential
shall be 45 feet.
FIGURE 5-1 CONCEPTUAL STREET SCAPE MASTER PLAN amend to remove the through
street shown fi.om Fourth Street to Fifth Street along the eastern boundary of Planning Area VI.
FIGURI~ 5-2 MAJOR ARTERIAL DIVIDED STREET CLASSIFICATION amend to allow
linear sidewalks to create a more urban fornx
General Amendments
1. In instances in which the Development Guidelines are inconsistent with the
implementation of an "urban" development theme for Planning Area VI, as well as the
Site Plan specific for this area, minor departures fi'om the Design Guidelines are
acceptable subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
1. In the event ora conflict between the amended Specific Plan and the Development Code,
the amended Specific Plan shall govern.
5510 Momhousc Drive, Suite 200 · San Diego, California 92121
Ordinance No. 656
Page 7 of 10
City of Rancho Cucamonga
September 26, 2000
Page 3
Fairfield prides itself on the design and construction quality of its apartment communities. This
project will be a viable component to the surrounding uses, and will provide a quality living
environment for our tenants.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information (858) 457-2123.
Very truly yours,
Ed McCoy
Pre-development Manager
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite200 · San Diego, California 92121
Ordinance No. 656
Page 8 of 10
Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Ama 18 Specific Plan
TABLE 4-1
SUMMARY OF LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
This table is conceptual to illustrate and summarize the maximum development potential of the
project. See Section 4.2, Land Use Plan, as well as Table 5. permitted
and
5.2
for
land
and
definitions.
l~pes of Uses
E · ' ->' FAR
Floor
i ~ ~''~ ~ j ' potmltial(sf Ratio}
Planning = ~
Parcel/Facility Area (Acre~) O _ ~ e: ; =: · units) du/ac
· Building 600 V~ 27 O · O · O O · 308,000~ 0.25I
· Building 601 IV= 17 242,000~ 0.35I
61
e
Subtotal 72 g75,000 0.31
Golf Course (incJuding
cJubhouse and
maintenance facility) I 151 · · · · · 60,000 0.01
CoIf Practice Facility II1' 22 15,0004 0.01°
(iig~Md) · · · · · · o ·
Subtotal 173 75,000 0.01
Commem-Jal/I nd ustrial-~,-~Vl. 23 · · · · · · ·,-.·_~:: 425,000 0.$5s
Parcels
VII 24 · · · · · · · 730,000 0.70*
%/111 23 · · · · 320,000 0.35
IX 21 · · · · 290,000 0.35
x 24 · · · · · · 200,000 0.20~
$ubMtel 133 2,240,000 0.39
Multiple Family up to615 du 24-30
commercial/
Total 378" 3,0~0,000 sf 0.56
and 30 du; or
3,290,000 sf~
~'.~;,ec~uPr~x~ ~,rm~30~.M~ 4-5 De~lopment Franm M~-/~
Ordinance No. 656
Page 9 of 10
Rancho cucamonga IASP Sub-Ama 18 Specific Plan
TABLE 5-1
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY PLANNING AREA
MANUFACTURING
Custom P P P C P P P P
Ught p p p p p p p
Medium p p p p p
WH OLESA~-JSTORAG F~OI~TRIBUTION
Public Storage (indOOr) C C
Light p p p p. p p p p
Medium P P C C
MATERIALS RECOVERY
¢1V1¢
Cutlural p P P P P P C P
Public Assembly p p p p p p p p
Public Buildings (l~rary, post office, etc.) p p p p p p p p
Public Safety & Util~ Services C C C C C C C C
Religious Assembly C C C C C C C C
PUBLICJSEMI-PUBMC U~ES
Child Cam Fadrities C C C C C C C C C C C
Clubs/Ledges (Private and Public) C C C C C C C C C C C
Convalescent Fac~itlesA-k~pltal C C C C C C C C C
Educational Institu'dons (Private am:l Public) C C C C C C C C C C
Transpon~tJon FaciJifies p
RECREATION
Golf Course p
G~f Practice/Training Facility p p p
Recreational Fa c~lifJe~ (indo~'/outdoo0 P P P P P P P P C P C
Eh t m~AINMENT
Arcede~ C C C C C C
Family Entmteinment Center (1) p p p p p
EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS
Resteurant-Fast Food (including D~'fve-thru) C C C C C C C C C C
Sporte Bar (1) p p p p p p
Ordinance No. 656
Page 10 of 10
Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Apaa 18 Speci~c Plan
TABLE 5-1 (continued)
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY PLANNING AREA
TRANSIENT ACCOMMODATiONS/CONFERENCE CENTER
Conference Center P P P P P F P
Co.orate Training Center P p p p p p
MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL
PERSONAJ./BUSINES$ SERVICES
Funeral & Crematory Services C C C C C C C C C C
Persotml Services p p p p p p p p p p
Repair Services p p p p p p p p p p
AUTOMOBILE/VEHICLE SERVICES
Autemotive Sewice Court C C C C
Automotive Sewice Station C C C C C C C
Specialty Aut~Motomycte Sales/Sewice C C C C C C C C
RETAIL--~USINES~ SUPPLY/SERViCES
RETAIL-FOOD & BEVERAGE RELATED
Retai!-Ge~ral(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) IP(2)IP(2)IP(2)IP(2)I IP(2) I
~ in Parking ~ p p p p p
RETAIL-HOME IMPROVEMENT RELATED
Bu~ingfl. ighting Equipment Supplies & Sales P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2)
H(3me Ai~pliance/Elec~onlcs P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2)
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
Parking (commercial)
RESlDENT1AJ.
C = Conditionally Pennitl~l
Blank Box = Not F~mitted Us~
(1) Where live eflterteinment is present, suc.h uses am subjec~ to a city enterteinment permit.
{gl R~id~ti,I I~mitted without indm~tr~l in th~ $~m, ~lann[ng ama.
R:~w~JPrdO0~ s~ra~s.o2os~.~¢~ 5-4 Deve~ement Guidelines and Standards
L