HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/08/21 - Agenda Packet OITY OF
RANCH D?GUOAM ON GA
10500 Ciwc .'CenteoDnve
Rancho Cucamonga 91730
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
F. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
AUGUST 21, 2002
Agency, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane ............................... Member
Grace Curatalo ......................... Member
Bob Dutton .............................. Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALLTO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane __,
Curatalo Dutton , and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the volunteers from the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Rancho Cucamonga and
Upland Stakes for their assistance with the Lemon Avenue Parkway
improvement Project.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: July 17, 2002
July 25, 2002 (Special Meeting)
July 30, 2002 (Special Adj. Meeting)
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. July 25 through August 15, 2002, 1
and Payroll ending July 28, 2002, for the total amount of $5,960,095.50
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 42
2002.
4. Approval to accept the 2002 Local Agency Biennial Notice pertaining to 49
the City's Conflict of Interest Code.
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002
2
5. Approval of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition in eminent
domain of certain real property interests for the extension of Day Creek
Boulevard and the widening of Base Line Road at APN 0227-161-21 as
part of the proposed Phase I-A ~mprovements of the Community
Facilities District 2001-01.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-231 58
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS
NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF
IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXTENSION OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE
WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD AS PART
OF THE PROPOSED PHASE 1-A
IMPROVEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
6. Approval of CLEEP Grant Equipment Purchases. 65
7. Approval to appropriate funds in the amount of $8,158.47 from the San 69
Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools Office Grant Budget in
the 2002/2003 fiscal year account number 12604015200.
8. Approval of authorization for the award of gymnastics and dance class 70
services for the Community Services Department per the proposals
received from Rancho Cucamonga Businesses, as follows: Dynasty
Gymnastics - all classes as proposed for age category 24 month -
adult; Precision Gymnastics - classes as proposed for age category 0
month - 23 months and special needs; Inland Valley Dance Academy -
all classes as proposed; and Dance Terrific - all classes as proposed
only excluding beginning Hip/Hop for age category 9 - 15 years.
9. Approval of a proposal for co-sponsorship of the Rancho Cucamonga
Chamber of Commerce's Grape Harvest Festival scheduled for October
4 - 6, 2002, at the Epicenter Special Event Area.
10. Approve Resolution granting authority to the City's PARSAC 74
Representative to approve and execute amendments to the Joint
Powers Agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-232
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S
DIRECTOR ON THE PUBLIC AGENCY RISK
SHARING AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO APPROVE AND
EXECUTE AMENDMENTS TO THE JOINT
POWERS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002
3
11. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and "/8
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC 2002-00040,
located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Sharon Circle,
submitted by Panattoni Development Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-233 81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2002~00040
RESOLUTION NO. 02-234 82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTNOS.1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00040
12. Approval of a License Agreement with Bobby Beene (CO 02-089) for 89
the operation of a coffee stand and accessories within the Rancho
Cucamonga Metrolink Station.
13. Approval of an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 90
the Cucamonga School District (CO 02-090) relating to a Joint Use of
the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School gymnasium facility.
14. Approval to appropriate $82,374 for contract development services by 99
Employment Services Incorporated, to be funded by the Community
Development Technical Services Fund Account No. 1016301-5300.
15. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $55,940.50 ($50,855.00 plus
10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, New West Signal (CO 02-
091), for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19t~ Street (SR 30) and
Jasper Street, to be funded from Safe Routes to School Program
Funds, Acct. No. 12343035650, and Transportation Funds, Acct. No.
11243035650, and appropriate $20,400.00 to Acct. No.
12343035650/1439234-0, to be fully reimbursed, and appropriate
$5,600.00 to Acct. No. 11243035650/1439124-0 from Transportation
Fund balance.
16. Approval of single source vendor selection and award a contract for 105
Senior Center programs from Gadabout Tours, Inc. (CO 02-092) in the
amount not to exceed $50,000 from Acct. #12504015300.
I
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002 4
17. Approval of single source vendor selection and award a contract for the 110
purchase of two (2) roller hockey borders from Pacific Design Concepts
(CO 02-093) in the amount not to exceed $23,500 from Acct.
#12504015605.
18. Approval of single source vendor selection and award a contract for 112
officiating/umpiring services for Adult Sports Leagues to Umps Are Us
Associat/on (CO 02-094) in the amount not to exceed $6,000 from Acct.
#12504015300 and $69,000 from Acct. #17004015305.
19. Approval of request to enter into a Lease Hold Agreement at Red Hill 116
Park between AT&T (CO 02-095) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for the purpose of installing a wireless communication facility for AT&T's
Wireless personal communication service.
20. Approval to accept the FY 2000/2001 Local Street Rehabilitation- 156
Overlay, Contract No. 01-073 as complete, approval to appropriate
$19,074.29 to Acct. No. 11823035650/1022182-0 from AB 2928 Traffic
Congestion Relief fund balance, retain the Performance Bond as a
Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final
contract amount of $572,432.80.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-235 157
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE FY 2000/2001
LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-OVERLAY,
CONTRACT NO. 01-073 AS COMPLETE AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002
5
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 159
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2002-00321 -
OLTMAN'S INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to amend the
circulation within the Industrial Development District, Subareas 12 and
13, to eliminate the portion of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo
Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue, submitted by Oltman's Investment
Company- APN: 229-263-68. Related Files: Development Review
DRC2001-00718. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-236 236
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE PER DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321
AMENDING THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
SUBAREAS 12 AND 13 TO ELIMINATE
MISSION PARK DRIVE, EAST OF BUFFALO
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 209-263-68
ORDINANCE NO. 684 238
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321, TO
AMEND THE STREET CIRCULATION WITHIN
THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
SUBAREAS 12 AND 13, ELIMINATING THE
EXTENSION OF MISSION PARK DRIVE EAST
OF BUFFALO AVENUE BY AMENDING
SECTION 17.30.080, FIGURES 17.30.080-0
AND 17.30.080-N OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002 6
2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 275
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 - CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development Code to
add text provisions for Mixed Use development for two areas: Area
One located on the north and south side of Foothill Boulevard between
Grove Avenue and the abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad corridor
(trestle) also known as the "Bear Gulch Area"; and, Area Two located
on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Amhibald Avenue and
Hellman Avenue, both as part of Phase II of the General Plan
Consistency Program. Related Files: Development District
Amendment DRC2002-00446A and Development District Amendment
DRC2002-00446B. This amendment is based on the updated General
Plan approved October 17, 2002, for which an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) was certified. This project is within the scope of that
previously certified EIR, does not raise or create new environmental
impacts not already considered in that certified EIR, and the previously
certified EIR adequately describes the activities for the purposes of
CEQA.
ORDINANCE NO. 685 357
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 TO ADD
TEXT PROVISIONS FOR MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT FOR T~NO AREA; AREA ONE,
APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES, LOCATED ON
THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE
AVENUE AND THE ABANDONED SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD CORRIDOR (TRESTLE)
ALSO KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA";
AND AREA TWO, APPROXIMATELY 37.5
ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HELLMAN
AVENUE
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002 7
3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 275
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development
District Map to change the land use designations from General
Commercial, Community Commercial, Office, Office Park, and Specialty
Commercial to mixed Use for 55 acres of land located on the north and
south sides of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the
abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad corridor (trestle) also known as
the "Bear Gulch Area,", as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency
Program -APN: 207-011-33, 35, 36, 43, 44, and 45; 207-101-13, 17,
24, 25, 31, and 41; 207-111-01, -02, 05 thru 17 and 23; 207-112-03,
thru 06, 09 thru 11, 13 thru 16, 20, and 21; 207-113-01 thru 18 and 23
thru 25; 207-123-33 and 34; 207-571-75 thru 78. Related Files:
Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00448 and Development
District Amendment DRC2002-00446B. This amendment is based on
the updated General Plan approved October 17, 2001, for which an
Environmental Impact Repod (EIR) was certified. This project is within
the scope of that previously certified EIR, does not raise or create new
environmental impacts not already considered in that cedified EIR, and
the previously certified EIR adequately describes the activities for the
purposes of CEQA.
ORDINANCE NO. 686 360
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FROM GENERAL
COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL,
OFFICE, OFFICE PARK, AND SPECIALTY
COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR 55
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH
AND SOUTH SIDES OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE
AND THE ABANDONED SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD CORRIDOR (TRESTLE), ALSO
KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA," AS
PHASE Ii OF THE GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY PROGRAM - APN: 207-011-
33, 35, 36, 43, 44, AND 45; 207-101-13, 17, 24,
25, 31, AND 41; 207-111-01, 02, 05 THRU 17,
AND 23; 207-112-03 THRU 06, 09 THRU 11, 13
THRU 16, 20, AND 21; 207-113-01 THRU 18,
23 THRU 25; 207-123-33, AND 34; 207-571-75
THRU 78
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002
8
4. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 275
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development
District Map to change the land use designations from Community
Commercial, Specialty Commercial, and Utility to Mixed Use for 10
acres of land at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Archibald Avenue as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program
- APN: 208-151-01, 14 thru 16, 19, and portions of 20 thru 22; 208-
152-06, 07, 09 thru 12, 14, and 16 thru 22; 208-153-01 thru 05 and 08
thru 23. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2002-
00448 and Development District Amendment DRC2002-00446A. This
amendment is based on the updated General Plan approved October
17, 2001, for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified.
This project is within the scope of that previously certified EIR, does not
raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in
that certified EIR, and the previously certified EIR adequately describes
the activities for the purposes of CEQA.
ORDINANCE NO. 687 363
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL, SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL,
AND UTILITY TO MIXED USE FOR 10 ACRES
OF LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD
AVENUE- APN: 208-151-01, 14 THRU 16, AND
19; 208-152-06, 07, 09 THRU 12, 14, 16 THRU
22; 208-153-01 THRU 05, AND 08 THRU 23
G~ PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
August 21, 2002
9
H_~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. PRESENTATION ON THE SECOND EDITION OF THE CITY'S
ANNUAL REPORT (ORAL)
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AND LOCAL 366
SUPPLEMENT, AS THE CITY'S BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
RESOLUTION NO. 02-237 368
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2001 UPDATE AND
LOCAL SUPPLEMENT THERETO AS THE
CITY'S BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 370
UPDATE
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
i, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on August 15, 2002, seventy two (72) hours prior
to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
July 17, 2002
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 17, 2002 in the
Council. Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:19 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Craig Fox, Assistant City Attorney; Linda Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon,
Management Analyst III; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, Dan
James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Brent LeCount, Associate Planner; Cathy Johnson,
Associate Planner; Jerry Grant, Interim Building Official; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy, Information
Systems Specialist; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager;
Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist
II - City Clerk's office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the members of the Etiwanda High School Eagles
Softball Team in honor of their winning the CIF Division 1 Southern Section Championship.
The Assistant Principal of Etiwanda High School stated the team could not be present, but that she would
be happy to accept the recognition on their behalf.
Councilmember Williams suggested they come to the next meeting so they could be recognized in
person.
B2. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the members of the Blaze Soccer Team in honor of
their winning the AYSO Region 65 Spring League Championships.
Mayor Alexander presented certificates to the coaches and team members.
B3. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Floyd M. Stork Elementary student Derrick Rodgers
in Recognition of his Educational Achievements.
Mayor Alexander presented the certificate to Harold Rodgers (Derrick's brother) since he could not be
present.
B4. Presentation of a Proclamation to Community Volunteer Saleena Guaba for sharing her artistic gifts
with our community.
Mayor Alexander presented a Proclamation and Key to the City to Saleena and thanked her for the joy
she has brought to the community. Her family was also introduced.
Saleena played a song for everyone's enjoyment.
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page 2
B5. Presentation of a Proclamation honoring the contributions of the late Ralph M. Lewis.
Mayor Alexander presented a Proclamation to Randall Lewis and commented on the great man that
Ralph Lewis was and all that he contributed to the City.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Cl. Lesha Smith with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) stated she is the City's
new liaison. She told about the service they provide to the City and that she is here to help. She also
distributed information which is on file in the City Clerk's office
02. John Lyons commented on the new Lewis Park stating how much he enjoyed it. He commented
on the "Toy Box" billboard located on Haven and Jersey and felt it should come down because it was
in appropriate.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Minutes: June 6, 2002 (Special Meeting - Workshop)
June 19, 2002
June 20, 2002 (Special Meeting)
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. July 3, 2002 and July 10, 2002 and Payroll ending June 30,
2002 for the total amount of $2,164,142.19.
D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2002.
D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for concourse and parking lot
improvements at the Adult Sports Complex, to be funded from Accounts 1025001-5602 ($53,000) and
1120305-5650/1209-120-0 ($195,000).
RESOLUTION NO. 02-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCOURSE AND PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
D5. Approval to designate Cherry Lane as a private street, thereby exempting the abutting properties
from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code. THIS ITEM WAS HEARD UNDER
ITEM F -ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CHERRY LANE AS A
PRIVATE STREET AND EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES
FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS
D6. Approval of addition of Milliken Park picnic shelters to the list of reservable park picnic shelters.
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page 3
DT. Approval to accept Offer of Dedication for street, highway and related purposes as shown on
Parcel Map 15641.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DEDICATION FOR STREET,
HIGHWAY AND RELATED PURPOSES AS OFFERED ON PARCEL
MAP 15641
D8. Approval to accept Dedication of Lot "A" for future street purposes and rights of ingress and egress
for said lot "A" as offered on Tract Map 8805.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF LOT "A"
FOR FUTURE STREET PURPOSES AND RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND
EGRESS FOR SAID LOT 'W' AS OFFERED ON TRACT MAP 8805
D9. Approval of a Resolution to accept from the State of California property lying north of the freeway
and south of Highland Avenue and approximately 600 feet east of Archibald Avenue. REMOVED FOR
DISCUSSION BY COUNClLMEMBER WILLIAMS
RESOLUTION NO. 02-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FROM THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, PROPERTY LYING NORTH OF THE FREEWAY AND
SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN AMETHYST AVENUE AND
APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE
D10. Approval of recommendation of a name for the park site located in the Rancho Etiwanda
development at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street.
Dll. Approval to approve a Resolution that the City shall identify and give consideration in its vehicle
procurement to the lowest emission vehicles wherever available, practical and cost competitive as
determined by the City.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVING THAT THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHALL IDENTIFY AND GIVE
CONSIDERATION IN ITS VEHICLE PROCUREMENT TO THE LOWEST
EMISSION VEHICLES WHEREVER AVAILABLE, PRACTICAL AND
COST COMPETITIVE, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY; PUBLIC
SAFETY AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM
THIS POLICY
D12. Approval to award and execution of Professional Services Agreement to Dan Guerra and
Associates (CO 02-070) for Construction Survey of the Community Facilities District Infrastructure
Improvements related to Phase la of CFD 2001-01 generally located north of Foothill Boulevard, south
of Base Line Road, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Etiwanda Avenue, to be funded from Acct.
1-612-303-5300 (Fund 612 - CFD 2001-01) for the amount of $324,500 ($295,000 plus 10%
contingency of $29,500).
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page 4
D13. Accept the bids received and award, and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 02-071) in
the amount of $389,846.38 ($354,405.80 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia
Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Overlay of Various
Streets, to be funded for Gas Tax 2105/Proposition 111 Funds, Account 11703035650/1022170-0.
D14. Approval of the renewal of the Collection Center Household Hazardous Waste Agreement with
the County of San Bernardino Service Area 70 Consolidated Fire District (CSA 70 CFD).
D15. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscaping Maintenance District No. 7 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Parcel Map 15802, located on the west side of
East Avenue north of Banyan Street, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
15802
RESOLUTION NO. 02-220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR
PARCEL MAP 15802
D16. Approval of a first amendment to the Joint Community Facilities Agreement (CO 01-053) between
City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga County Water District in connection with the first phase of
improvements to be constructed under CFD 2001-01.
D17. Approval of an agreement with Michael Brandman Associates, Inc., (CO 02-072) for the
preparation of a draft environmental impact report for a 359 lot subdivision (Subtt 16072) which will
include an annexation request and a development agreement located at the northeast corner of
Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues within the City's Sphere of Influence.
D18. Approval to execute the Norton-Fisher House Purchase and Use Agreements (CO 02-073 and
CO 02-074) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Etiwanda School District for the purchase
of the Landmark designated Norton-Fisher House for one dollar and a use agreement for the parking
facilities during non-school hours. The property, located at 7171 Etiwanda Avenue, is approximately
.25-acre and occupies the northwest most corner of Grapeland School. A portion of APN: 227-131-24.
D19. Approval of the plans and specifications, accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $7,029,405.57 ($6,390,368.70 plus 10% contingency) to the
apparent Iow bidder, E.L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc., (CO 02-075) for the construction of the
Phase I-A of Community Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from CFD 2001-01 funds, Account No.
16123035650/1442612-0.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 5 and 9. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM Dg. Approval of a Resolution to accept from the State of California
property lying north of the freeway and south of Highland Avenue and approximately 600 feet east
of Archibald Avenue,
Councilmember Williams stated she feels the trees are very important and wanted to make sure they are
saved as much as possible. She asked that this be put in writing.
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page $
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 02-218. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO PROVIDE SECTION 21354.4 (2.5%
~ 55 FULL FORMULA) AND APPROVE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE PARS RETIREMENT PLAN
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No.683.
ORDINANCE NO. 683
(2ncr Reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF
THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO
PROVIDE SECTION 21354.4 (2.5% @ 55 FULL FORMULA) FOR LOCAL
MISCELLANEOUS MEMBERS
RESOLUTION NO. 02-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF THE PARS RETIREMENT SYSTEM PLAN TO BE ADMINISTERED
BY PHASE II SYSTEMS, PARS TRUST ADMINISTRATOR FOR CITY
EMPLOYEES
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No.
683 and approve Resolution No. 02-221. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. APPEAL OF STREET NAME CHANGE DRC 2002-00300 - SOLBERG -An appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to approve a street name change from Miller Avenue to "Church Street" for that
portion of Miller Avenue between the current easternmost terminus of Church Street and the east
boundary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (intersection of Miller Avenue and East Avenue).
Staff report presented by Brent LeCount, Associate Planner.
Mayor Alexander inquired if this small section of Miller can stay like this.
Brent LeCount, Associate Planner, stated the City Council can do that if they want to.
Mayor Alexander stated he would like to do this.
Councilmember Williams asked if the homes on Miller would get curb and gutter when the other areas on
Church are developed on through.
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page 6
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated ultimately they would.
The rest of the Council stated they would agree with the Mayor's comments.
Councilmember Curatalo stated as long as it is safe that is her concern and stated she appreciates the
Mayor's comments.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Gwen Frost, 12996 Victoria and from the Etiwanda Historical Society, stated she takes pride in
the community of Etiwanda. She felt it was important to leave the street as Miller.
Elaine Gallegos, 12958 Miller, stated she would like the street to stay as Miller. She also talked
about other streets that are named after famous people in the City from the earlier days.
Jim Frost, 12996 Victoria, had various maps showing street name changes within the City and
surrounding areas. He felt Miller should remain as is.
John Solberg stated he enjoys living on Miller and agrees with the Mayor's comments.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed
Councilmember Dutton stated he felt this is the time when special considerations should be given and felt
the appeal should be granted.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-222- NOT APPROVED
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENV.!NG AN APPEAL OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE A STREET
NAME CHANGE FROM MILLER AVENUE TO "CHURCH STREET" FOR
THAT PORTION OF MILLER AVENUE BETWEEN THE CURRENT
EASTERN MOST TERMINUS OF CHURCH STREET AND THE EAST
BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
(INTERSECTION OF MILLER AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE), AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to grant the appear. Motion carried unanimously 5-
0.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF REVISION TO THE FEE FOR INSPECTION OUTSIDE OF NORMAL
BUSINESS HOURS
Staff report presented by Jerry Grant, Interim Building Official. He added there is a revised page to the
staff report which had been distributed to the Council and is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
Councilmember Dutton stated he has problems with someone having to pay a fee for a fire inspection.
He also felt Friday was a normal working day and people should not be charged for Friday inspections.
Mayor Alexander stated he appreciates Councilmember Dutton's comments, but added the City staff is
already working 40+ hours per week.
Councilmember Dutton felt possibly a comparison of other cities would be a good idea.
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page ?
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is being done because the contract costs have increased. He stated
we use contract inspectors because of the amount of work the City has.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 02-023
MODIFYING THE FEE FOR INSPECTIONS OUTSIDE OF NORMAL
BUSINESS HOURS
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 02-223.
Councilmember Williams felt there should be clarification on how the four hour minimum is worded.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is being done through this Resolution.
Motion carried 4-1 (Dutton voted no).
F3. APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE CHERRY LANE AS A PRIVATE STREET, THEREBY EXEMPTING
THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE.
Staff report presented by Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CHERRY LANE AS A
PRIVATE STREET AND EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES
FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 02-215. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
July 17, 2002
Page 8
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
ACTION: Report received and filed.
12. UPDATE ON THE CLEAN SWEEP PROGRAM (ORAL REPORT)
Staff report presented by Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. A power point
presentation was also given by Sgt. Gonzales and Sgt. Morrow which is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Councilmember Williams felt the schools are to be commended.
Councilmember Dutton complimented everybody on this program and stated we all want our kids to be
safe.
Sgt. Morrow stated they also congratulate the School Board for getting involved with this program.
Sgt. Gonzales thanked the City Council for their support and also for the support of Captain Pete Ortiz.
Councilmember Curatalo felt the Police Department has done a wonderful job.
Councilmember Williams asked if this information would be made available to all of the parents at these
schools.
Sgt. Morrow stated yes it would be.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
J, IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like an update on how the Clean Sweep program is going
with the schools once school starts. He felt October would be a good time to bring this back.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 9:08 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
July 25, 2002
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Meetinq
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, July 25, 2002 in the Tri
Communities Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 3:05 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Michelle Dawson,
Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry
Henderson, Principal Planner; Donald Granger, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; and Debra
J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ITEM OF BUSINESS
B1. DISCUSSION OF THE COLONIES PROJECT AND UPLAND'S REQUEST TO ANNEX PORTIONS
OF FLOOD CONTROL PROPERTIES CURRENTLY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL AT 19~' STREET FOR THE
CQLONIES PROJECT
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City Council requested that this item be discussed and that the EIR
be reviewed.
Brad Buller, City Planner, gave a report stating that neighborhood meetings have occurred as well as this
being discussed at the Planning Commission. He indicated on maps that were disptayed where the
Colonies Project was located which was at the western edge of the City. He referred to his hand outs
entitled "Review of Colonies project" and "Annexation Deal Points" which are on file in the City Clerk's
office.
After various questions from both the City Council and the City of Upland representatives, a recess was
taken at 3:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 4:05 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.
Mayor Pomierski of Upland stated they would like to know what the cost of the EIR impacts are to Rancho
Cucamonga and that once that is established they could back into that number.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it was approximately $621,000.
Mayor Pomierski suggested there be a payment schedule of 10 years starting in 2006 or 2007.
Councilmember Williams stated she is very concerned about the pylon signs and the noise that would be
generated from this project. She felt the Rancho Cucamonga residents should be considered and how
this project will impact them. She also suggested that Upland consider putting in a park because she felt
the people would want that.
Special City Council Minutes
July 25, 2002
Page 2
Councilmember Biane stated he would like to hear what Upland comes back with on deal points.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to adjourn and continue this item to Tuesday, July 30,
2002, 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
July 30, 2002
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Adiourned Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday, July 30, 2002
in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 3:05 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. A~exander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Michelle Dawson,
Management Analyst Ill; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City
Engineer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ITEM OF BUSINESS
B1. DISCUSSION OF THE COLONIES PROJECT AND UPLAND'S REQUEST TO ANNEX PORTIONS
OF FLOOD CONTROL PROPERTIES CURRENTLY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, WEST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL AT 19~' STREET FOR THE
COLONIES PROJECT- Item continued from July 25, 2002
Mayor Alexander stated this item was continued from July 25 and asked if there was anyone that would
like to speak at this time. There was no response.
Jack Lam, City Manager, updated the Council and public as to what had occurred at the previous
meeting.
Mayor Alexander stated the Council had asked the City Manager to provide them written information
about this project, which he had done through a memorandum that is on file in the City Clerk's office. He
continued to quote some of the information contained in this memorandum. He pointed out that there
was a boundary situation from the 1980's on 19th Street east of the storm drain where Upland would not
deannex a portion of the property to Rancho Cucamonga.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, informed the Council about the T~A plan. He informed them how a major
project can cause traffic problems for various surrounding streets.
Mayor Alexander asked if Rancho Cucamonga will be making improvements in other cities when the
City's mall is built.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes that it will affect Fontana.
Councilmember Williams asked if the developer gives the City the money to pay for these improvements
in Fontana and if we hold that money until they are ready to make the improvements in their City.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the City Council were:
Special Adjourned City Council Minutes
July 30, 2002
Page 2
J.P. Pomierski, Mayor of Upland, read their proposal to the Council, which was distributed to the
Council.
Councilmember Biane asked what the normal process for a project is, adding he has not been involved
with this type of thing in the seven years he has been on the Council.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated most EIR issues are normally handled at a staff level.
Councilmember Biane stated if the developer or Upland had come to the City asking for monetary
assistance with the bridge, he would have supported it.
Councilmember Dutton inquired about the boundary line from the channel edge to the new boundary.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated it was 34 feet.
Councilmember Curatalo stated she went through the project on a four-wheel drive and felt she
understands the project and can now vote on it.
Mike Thornton talked about various aspects of the project and also showed a map indicating how
close the auto mall was to the residents.
Councilmember Williams stated she is concerned that Rancho Cucamonga residents will back up to the
auto mall and will have to look at a big wall.
Jeff Bloom showed a map of the project and explained it.
Pete Pitassi, Project Manager for the Colonies, stated there is an access road on the west side of
the channel to be used as an access road. He stated there would be a block wall between the
Rancho Cucamonga residents and the auto dealership.
Councilmember Williams stated she is very concerned about the aesthetics and the other impacts this
project will have on Rancho Cucamonga. She asked if the trash enclosures for this project will be on the
Rancho Cucamonga border side. She stated she is very concerned about the pylon signs. She asked if
there was a chance to move the sign because she felt totally violated about it.
Jeff Bloom stated If Councilmember Williams would like a minimum set back put in the plan of
600 feet from the nearest residence in Rancho Cucamonga he would be more than happy to add
that to the design standards.
Councilmember Williams agreed that would give about an additional 200 feet and felt that was something
and stated she agreed with that.
Melanie Ingram, Rosebud Street, felt more residents are affected than those on Sapphire and
19*h. She stated the Rancho Cucamonga residents have not been involved in their meetings until
July 11th. She stated that the residents questioned why they are developing above the freeway.
She asked for the Council to help to limit what is built north of the freeway and felt the auto mall
was the worse part of this project.
Bill McCowan, lives near this proposed development, stating every time they turn around there is
something going into the project that they did not know about. He stated they moved to the
northern part of the City to get away from the auto malls and the Targets. He stated he is
disappointed that they are doing this to the Rancho Cucamonga and Upland residents. He stated
they do not want this commercial development so close to their homes. He stated he does not
want the City of Rancho Cucamonga to deannex this property for Upland to be able to put up
billboards and large pylons.
Special Adjourned City Council Minutes
July 30, 2002
Page 3
Marilyn Smith felt the lights could possibly impact Rancho Cucamonga residents and did not feel
they should have to put up with that. She also felt the tall signs should be dealt with. She stated
they do not need billboards in Rancho Cucamonga and wanted the City to reconsider deannexing
this property.
Councilmember Williams stated no matter whether the property is deannexed or not the signs and lights
will go up anyway.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the City still has the opportunity to comment on the specific plan.
Councilmember Dutton added the City has no control over what is built near Rancho Cucamonga's
boundary in the City of Upland. He felt it makes sense to deannex this property to Upland. He hopes they
will listen and consider the concerns of the Rancho Cucamonga residents.
Councilmember Williams stated she concurs. She hoped that the dialogue will continue. She stated the
impact to the Rancho Cucamonga residents is the most important thing.
Councilmember Curatalo stated she has looked at the property and felt this project will be a great addition
to the City and hoped that Upland will consider Rancho Cucamonga residents' concerns.
Councilmember Biane stated he feels this property has no value to Rancho Cucamonga and stated he is
not sure that the City is taking the right approach. He felt it makes sense to deannex this property to
Upland. He felt Upland's proposal is tied to the TIA.
Mayor Alexander asked that they move the commercial away from the Rancho Cucamonga border and
put the residential development near the Rancho Cucamonga border. He felt the commercial should be
near the center of the project. He asked that the signs be moved near Campus so there would not be an
impact on Rancho Cucamonga residents. He felt Upland should consider having a park in this project so
that Heritage Park is not overly impacted. He felt that trust has been violated with regards to the trails
system because of the grant funds that Upland and Fontana were able to get and not shared with the
other cities.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the question to the Council is if they wish to authorize deannexation and
annexation of the property, and if they do this staff will continue to work with the City of Upland. He
stated the other question is how does the Council wish to deal with design review. If there are other
points they want carried out they need to give that direction to the staff which can then be put into an
agreement.
Councilmember Dutton inquired how does the City guarantee that the property to the west of the flood
control remains open space and asked if it needs to be acquired from the County.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the only way to control it is to own it, which the City does not at this time.
Councilmember Dutton felt the revenue that is received from this should be used to secure the open
space east of the channel so the City can get some additional benefit from what Upland is doing on their
side of the channel.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated staff can certainly look into this. He added that LAFCO will not initiate
deannexation unless they get a letter of support from the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Jack Lam, City Manager, clarified what the TIA money is and how it is derived at.
Mayor Alexander suggested that the while issue be dropped and let the land stay as it is.
Special Adjourned City Council Minutes
July 30, 2002
Page 4
Councilmember Williams felt the City should be known as the "Big City with a Big Heart with a Big Classy
Act" and felt the City should work in cooperation.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to authorize staff to start the deannexation and
annexation proceedings with the City of Upland regarding the property located north and south of the 210
Freeway. Motion carried 4-1 (Alexander voted no.)
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
D. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186351 7/25/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 4,705.74
AP - 00186351 7/25/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 8,101.41
AP - 00186351 7/25/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 6,260.03
AP - 00186352 7/25/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 179.85
AP - 00186352 7/25/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 44.58
AP- 00186353 7/29/2002 SMARTAND FINAL I82.20
AP - 00186353 7/29/2002 SMART AND FINAL 152.44
AP - 00186353 7/29/2002 SMART AND FINAL 178.70
AP - 00186353 7/29/2002 SMART AND FINAL 139.29
AP- 00186354 7/29/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 217.83
AP - 00186354 7/29/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 560.25
AP - 00186354 7/29/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 24.86
AP - 00186354 7/29/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 71.08
AP - 00186354 7/29/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 24.39
AP- 00186355 7/30/2002 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 1,251.15
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIKE SERVICE 18.54
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 18.54
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 55.62
AP- 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 55.62
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 18.54
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.08
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 18.54
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 432.09
AP- 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.08
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 423.48
AP - 00186356 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 18.54
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 729.75
AP- 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 883.89
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 816.25
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 36.93
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 39.63
AP- 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 252.97
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 70.98
AP- 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,481.87
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 436.95
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 108.32
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 352.36
AP - 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 377.53
AP- 00186357 7/31/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 454.18
AP - 00186358 7/31/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 35.40
AP- 00186359 7/31/2002 ABADILLA, MARY GRACE 76.00
AP - 00186360 7/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 15.19
AP- 00186361 7/31/2002 ABSG CONSULTING INC 15,278.81
AP- 00186361 7/31/2002 ABSG CONSULTING INC 2,620.00
AP- 00186362 7/31/2002 ALEXANDER, WILLIAM J 267.43
AP - 00186363 7/31/2002 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 350.00
AP - 00186364 7/31/2002 ALWAYS BALLOONS 115.00
AP - 00186365 7/31/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 597.67
AP-00186366 7/31/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 286.71
AP- 00186367 7/31/2002 AMINIKItARILAZI, LORRAINE 48.00
AP- 00186368 7/31/2002 ANDERSON CHERTKOW, CRISTINA 113.00
AP- 00186369 7/31/2002 ARBOR NURSERY 1NC 71.85
AP - 00186369 7/31/2002 ARBOR NURSERY INC 5t0.00
AP - 00186370 7/31/2002 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 492.02
User: cgo~zzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 1 Current Date: 08/15/2
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porixait Layout Time: ~, 08:3
_/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002 ~'
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ~'
AP- 00186371 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85
AP- 00186371 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 23.32
AP - 00186371 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 268.70
AP- 00186372 7/31/2002 ASSI SECURITY 850.00
AP - 00186373 7/31/2002 AUTO RESTORATORS 11,478.21
AP - 00186374 7/31/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 16.43
AP - 00186374 7/31/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 92.83
AP - 00186374 7/31/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 55.47
AP- 00186375 7/31/2002 BAKER, DELORES 38.00
AP- 00186376 7/31/2002 BANEGAS, SILVIA 76.00
AP- 00186377 7/31/2002 BAZZO, JANE 17.00
AP - 00186378 7/31/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,965.00
AP - 00186379 7/31/2002 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 2,386.66
AP- 00186380 7/31/2002 BIKEZONE USA INC 511.67
AP- 00186381 7/31/2002 BLAKLEY, TANASHA 30.00
AP- 00186382 7/31/2002 BLUE HAVEN POOLS 269.50
AP- 00186383 7/31/2002 BOLDUC, RACHEL 38.00
AP- 00186384 7/31/2002 BREWT POWER SYSTEMS 379.97
AP- 00186384 7/31/2002 BREWT POWER SYSTEMS 4,836.67
AP-00186385 7/31/2002 BRIDGES, LIZ 38.00
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.59
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.22
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 53.34
AP-00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 200.31
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 80.33
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.53
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP-00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 102.34
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 23.24
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 26.34
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 26.14
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.10
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.65
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 548.62
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.59
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 43.56
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 2 Current Date: 08/15/~
Repo,rt:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 50.40
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 23.06
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.90
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 64.49
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 52.58
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 20.53
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 6.84
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 18.75
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 135.06
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 23.06
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 71.33
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP-00186391 ' 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 180.43
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.90
AP ~ 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS '4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 41.05
AP-00186391 7/3t/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 9.37
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.59
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.22
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.55
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 34.21
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 14.07
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.90
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP-00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 64.12
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 64.12
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 46.42
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 78.13
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.47
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 3 Current Date: 08/15/2
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 tkrough 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.50
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 218.25
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 29.23
AP-00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 12.26
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 63.86
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 29.12
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 77.96
AP ~ 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 45.35
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 37.73
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.65
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 18.40
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 10.96
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 159.02
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.94
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 123.07
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 61.90
AP- 00186391' 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 386.54
AP- 00186391 ~7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 107.46
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 19.38
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 240.18
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 43.50
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.75
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 430.78
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 127.67
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.97
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.35
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.75
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 55.19
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 29.42
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 95.01
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 48.04
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 12.93
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 29.00
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 82.64
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.30
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 17.19
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 43.54
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 44.15
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 31.88
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 104.36
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 89.11
AP - 00186391 7/3t/2002 BRODART BOOKS 48.40
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 33.10
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 39.57
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 10.63
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 37.72
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 21.33
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.44
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.51
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 140.25
User: cgonzale - Carote Gonzales Page: 4 Current Date: 08/15/~
Repo.rt:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A~enda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 125.91
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 14.75
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 24.82
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 118.92
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 35.93
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 15.93
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 16.55
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 91.32
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 39.67
AP 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 34.88
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 164.48
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 8.38
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 19.35
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 40.65
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 16.44
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 69.92
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 23.66
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 33.95
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 29.00
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.32
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 25.17
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODARTBOOKS 18.39
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 24.57
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS '18.32
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 11.53
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 32.43
AP- 00186391 .. 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.53
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 52.58
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 13.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 6.84
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 20.53
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 32.80
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP - 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 46.88
AP- 00186391 7/31/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP- 00186392 7/31/2002 BROMLEY, ADELE 3.80
AP- 00186393 7/31/2002 BROOKS MELVIN, CATHI 15.00
AP- 00186393 7/31/2002 BROOKS MELVIN, CATHI 12.00
AP - 00186393 7/31/2002 BROOKS MELVIN, CATHI 30.00
AP - 00186394 7/31/2002 BROWN, CAROL 88.00
AP- 00186395 7/31/2002 BUMGARNER, JACKIE 108.00
AP- 00186396 7/31/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 12.04
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 5 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
.Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP- 00186396 7/31/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 240.39
AP- 00186396 7/31/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 41.55
AP- 00186396 7/31/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 1,278.36
AP- 00186397 7/31/2002 CAKLOVIC, MARIA 15.00
AP- 00186398 7/31/2002 CAL COVER PRODUCTS 50.00
AP- 00186399 7/31/2002 CALIFORNIA STATIONERS 65.47
AP- 00186400 7/31/2002 CARUSOS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 763.20
AP- 00186401 7/31/2002 CHARRETTE, IRENE 152.00
AP - 00186402 7/31/2002 CHEVRON USA INC 228.47
AP- 00186403 7/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 2.29
AP - 00186404 7/31/2002 CITY RENTALS 165.00
AP - 00186404 7/31/2002 CITY RENTALS 180.77
AP - 00186405 7/31/2002 CRAWFORD, TRICIA 37.00
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 416.49
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 165.17
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 307.31
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 291.86
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 293.56
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 129.12
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 355.02
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 346.45
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 33.18
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 791.05
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 249.27
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 826.07
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 352.27
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 840.49
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 731.47
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 95.80
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 299.07
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 182.32
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 568.93
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 276.26
AP - 00186407 27/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 682.23
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,400.14
AP ~ 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 279.50
AP ~ 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 86.88
AtP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 758.45
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 198.13
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 389.71
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 809.59
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 394.86
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 33.32
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 509.63
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 93.05
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,743.29
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 731.31
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 482.05
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST 89.95
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 859.31
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 156.13
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 999.37
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,383.43
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 622.49
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 6 Current Date: 08/I5/~
Report:CK AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A~enda Check Re~ister
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
' Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 218.73
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 760.51
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 665.39
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 355.02
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 590.20
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 475.87
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 660.24
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST 4,784.03
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 461.81
AP- 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 366.98
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.78
AP - 00186407 ,7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 272.29
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 529.79
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 203.28
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 354.69
AP - 00186407 7/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,550.59
AP- 00186408 7/31/2002 DANESHVAR, HOMA 151.00
AP- 00186409 7/31/2002 DANIEL, LEANN 70.00
AP- 00186410 7/31/2002 DAVID, ANIFLOR 30.00
AP- 00186411 7/31/2002 DECORDOVA, CHRISTINE 38.00
AP- 00186412 7/31/2002 DEMMERS, L1NDA 10.75
AP - 00186413 7/31/2002 ELBENDARY AZZAWI, HANAN 76.00
AP - 00186414 7/31/2002 ESTRADA, MARCELLA 38.00
AP 00186415 7/31/2002 EUGENIAS GONZALEZ, LINDA 40.00
AP 00186415 7/31/2002 EUGENIAS GONZALEZ, LINDA 108.00
AP 00186416 7/31/2002 FAUSTPRINT1NG1NC 4,163.46
AP 00186417 7/31/2002 FINLAY, JENNIFER 75.00
AP 00186418 7/31/2002 FRANDSEN, AMY 37.00
AP 00186419 7/31/2002 FULLER, JANET 32.00
AP 00186420 7/31/2002 FURUKAWA, CHARLENE 75.00
AP 00186421 7/31/2002 GAGLIA, DAWN 40.00
AP 00186422 7/31/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 345.80
AP 00186422 7/31/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 374.80
AP 00186422 7/31/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 128.00
AP 00186422 7/31/2002 GENEKATOR SERVICES CO 628.00
AP 00186423 7/31/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 38.79
AP 00186424 7/31/2002 GEORGI, SHERYL 27.00
AP 00186425 7/31/2002 GILDAS, JENNIE 38.00
AP- 00186426 7/31/2002 GONZALEZ, STEPHANIE 75.00
AP- 00186427 7/31/2002 GREEN, CAROL 76.00
AP- 00186428 7/31/2002 GRESHAM, DELICIA 7.60
AP - 00186429 7/31/2002 HAIFA, ASIBA 10.10
AP - 00186430 7/31/2002 HALF CITY PRODUCTIONS 1,549.45
AP- 00186431 7/31/2002 HERNANDEZ, JANIS 12.50
AP- 00186432 7/31/2002 HERNANDEZ, SANDRA 49.00
AP- 00186433 7/31/2002 IBM CORPORATION 2,585.00
AP - 00186434 7/31/2002 ID BURR 678.91
AP- 00186434 7/31/2002 ID BURR 363.79
AP-00186434 7/31/2002 ID BURR 808.13
AP- 00186434 7/31/2002 ID BURR 687.23
AP - 00186434 7/31/2002 ID BURR 783.41
AP - 00186435 7/31/2002 IML INSTRUMENT MECHANIC LABOR INC 4,243.50
AP- 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 126.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 652.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 7 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 470.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 624.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 147.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 59.00
AP- 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 94.00
AP- 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 124.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 110.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 730.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 270.00
AP - 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 366.00
AP 00186436 7/31/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 62.00
AP 00186437 7/31/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 29.09
AP 00186438 7/31/2002 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 10,555.00
AP 00186439 7/31/2002 IRON AGE CORPORATION 115.24
AP 00186439 7/31/2002 IRON AGE CORPORATION 82.91
AP 00186440 7/31/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 8.00
AP 00186441 7/31/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN 10.00
AP 00186441 7/31/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN 754.25
AP 00186441 7/31/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN 1,066.73
AP 00186441 7/31/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN 400.83
AP 00186442 7/31/2002 JACKSON HIRSH INC 359.58
AP - 00186443 7/31/2002 JANECK, LINDA 30.66
AP - 00186444 7/31/2002 JUAREZ, JORGE 291.50
AP- 00186445 7/31/2002 KAUR, MANDY 450.00
AP- 00186446 7/31/2002 KETTLE, SAMANTHA 37.00
AP-00186447 7/31/2002 KING, TIFFANY 38.00
AP- 00186448 7/31/2002 KTDD 1350 AM 1,855.00
AP- 00186449 7/31/2002 KUIZENGA, JACKIE 88.00
AP - 00186450 7/31/2002 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 200.93
AP- 00186451 7/31/2002 LANDAYAN, PURFICACION 38.00
AP - 00186452 7/31/2002 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 10.78
AP - 00186453 7/31/2002 LEACH, ANN 37.00
AP- 00186454 7/31/2002 LEE, JAN 38.00
AP- 00186455 7/31/2002 LEE, JANNY 38.00
AP- 00186456 7/31/2002 LEUCH, LOIS 9.24
AP - 00186456 7/31/2002 LEUCH, LOIS 14.92
AP - 00186457 7/31/2002 LIEBERMAN, SUZIE 48.00
AP - 00186458 7/31/2002 LIEBERT CASStDY WHITMORE 63.00
AP - 00186458 7/31/2002 LIEBERT CASS}DY WHITMORE 1,600.00
AP - 00186459 7/31/2002 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 958.70
AP - 00186460 7/31/2002 LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC 477.12
AP- 00186461 7/31/2002 MACIAS, OP..ALIA 38.00
AP-00186462 7/31/2002 MARIN, DENISE 38.00
AP- 00186463 7/31/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,677.40
AP - 00186463 7/31/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 630.09
AP- 00186463 7/31/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 84.56
AP- 00186463 7/31/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,143.38
AP - 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 95.00
AP - 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 382.75
AP - 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 77.00
AP - 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 53.00
AP - 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 77.00
AP - 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 304.92
AP- 00186464 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 77.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 8 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name. Amount
AP - 00186465 7/31/2002 MARTIN, CARRIE 3.80
AP - 00186466 7/31/2002 MART1NEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00186467 7/31/2002 MATT'S HARDWARE 24.22
AP - 00186468 7/31/2002 MAYFIELD, CATHERINE 5.00
AP - 00186468 7/31/2002 MAYFIELD, CATHERINE 62.00
AP- 00186469 7/31/2002 MCFADDEN, KIM 76.00
AP - 00186470 7/31/2002 MDM T SHIRT AND PROMO 1,298.81
AP- 00186471 7/31/2002 MICHAEL, MARLENE 37.00
AP- 00186472 7/31/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 262.75
AP-00186473 7/31/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 3,630.14
AP- 00186474 7/31/2002 MITCHNER, MAUR~EN 75.00
AP- 00186475 7/31/2002 MOORE, LEWIS 38.00
AP - 00186476 7/31/2002 MORA, LYNDA 37.00
AP - 00186477 7/31/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 46.15
AP - 00186478 7/31/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 322.31
AP- 00186478 7/31/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 187.04
AP- 00186478 7/31/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.43
AP- 00186478 7/31/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 30.41
AP- 00186478 7/31/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.79
AP - 00186479 7/31/2002 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY 10.46
AP - 00186480 7/31/2002 NATIONS RENT 331.41
AP - 00186481 7/31/2002 NAVARRO, JOSEFINA 75.00
AP- 00186482 7/31/2002 NESTOR, ALEXANDRIA 180.00
AP- 00186483 7/31/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 76.94
AP- 00186483 7/31/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 69.17
AP- 00186483 7/31/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 38.47
AP- 00186484 7/31/2002 OCLC INC 58.89
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 52.71
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 87.81
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -236.90
AP- 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 14.63
AP- 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 121.27
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 429.65
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.78
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 20.71
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 16.64
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 244.16
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 79.16
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 82.41
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 37.39
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 165.34
AP 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 224.88
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 563.74
AP-00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 10.64
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 25.17
AP- 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 38.78
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 8.72
AP- 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 96.60
AP - 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 37.29
AP-00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 464.26
AP- 00186485 7/31/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 11.03
AP - 00186486 7/31/2002 OLIVAS, BLANCA 300.00
AP ~ 00186487 7/31/2002 ONG, HOOIHWA 10.00
AP - 00186487 7/31/2002 ONG, HOOIHWA 76.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 9 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout ' Time: A08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ~
AP- 00186488 7/31/2002 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE INC 7,007.30
AP- 00186489 7/31/2002 ORTIZ, DONNA 5.00
AP- 00186489 7/31/2002 ORTIZ, DONNA 37.00
AP- 00186490 7/31/2002 ORTIZ, IMELDA 37.00
AP- 00186491 7/31/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 43.06
AP- 00186492 7/31/2002 OWENS, LISA 38.00
AP- 00186493 7/31/2002 PACER TECHNOLOGY 743.12
AP - 00186494 7/31/2002 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 421.49
AP- 00186495 7/31/2002 PALMER, RUTH 25.00
AP- 00186496 7/31/2002 PATEL, BHAVANA 76.00
AP - 00186497 7/31/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE 1NC 254.24
AP - 00186498 7/31/2002 PETRE, BARBARA 62.00
AP - 00186499 7/31/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,252.97
AP - 00186499 7/31/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,445.37
AP- 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 135.17
AP - 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 186.20
AP- 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAK1 405.23
AP- 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 386.80
AP- 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 405.24
AP- 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 584.85
AP- 00186500 7/31/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 698.61
AP- 00186501 7/31/2002 PRECIADO, IRENE 35.00
AP- 00186502 7/31/2002 PRICE, ROBERT 50.00
AP - 00186503 7/31/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 92.67
AP - 00186504 7/31/2002 RADIO SHACK ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 47.02
AP- 00186504 7/31/2002 RADIO SHACKACCOLrNTS RECEIVABLE 1,695.36
AP - 00186505 7/31/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SOFTBALL 500.00
AP- 00186506 7/31/2002 RAYON, SHIRLEY 124.00
AP- 00186507 7/31/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 144.17
AP- 00186508 7/31/2002 RMA GROUP 1,476.00
AP- 00186509 7/31/2002 ROBERTS, JOANNE 177.50
AP- 00186510 7/31/2002 ROBERTS, LORI 37.00
AP- 00186511 7/31/2002 RODRIGUEZ, ANNA 5.00
AP - 00186511 7/31/2002 RODRIGUEZ, ANNA 37.00
AP- 00186512 7/31/2002 RODRIGUEZ, CLAVDIA 37.00
AP - 00186513 7/31/2002 RYAN, LEONOR 3.80
AP - 00186514 7/31/2002 S B AND O INC 8,150.00
AP 00186515 7/31/2002 SADD, MONA 38.00
AP 00186516 7/31/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 1,153.46
AP 00186517 7/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 18.00
AP 00186518 7/31/2002 SANCHEZ, KAREN 10.00
AP 00186518 7/31/2002 SANCHEZ, KAREN 76.00
AP 00186519 7/31/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 1,797.90
AP 00186519 7/31/2002 SBC/PACIFICBELL 1,350.59
AP 00186519 7/31/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 1,121.42
AP 00186520 7/31/2002 SCHRADER, JUDY 65.00
AP 00186521 7/31/2002 SCOTT, KRISTIN 38.00
AP 00186522 7/31/2002 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS 2,524.81
AP 00186523 7/31/2002 SHEN, YANG 40.00
AP- 00186524 7/31/2002 SIR SPEEDY 150.31
AP- 00186525 7/31/2002 SMITH, GREG 38.00
AP- 00186526 7/31/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 10.00
AP - 00186526 7/3t/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 1,052.42
AP - 00186527 7/31/2002 SORRELL, JOD1 660.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 10 Current Date: 08/15/7~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 162.14
AP- 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25
AP - 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.30
AP- 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.92
AP- 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.32
AP - 00186528 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52
AP- 00186529 7/31/2002 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.37
AP-00186530 7/31/2002 SUN, ANNIE 76.00
AP - 00186531 7/31/2002 TERBERG, CANDACE 10.00
AP - 00186531 7/31/2002 TERBERG, CANDACE 76.00
AP - 00186532 7/31/2002 TOMARK SPORTS INC 1,369.59
AP 00186533 7/31/2002 TRUDO, TERILENCE 76.00
AP 00186534 7/31/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 403.42
AP 00186535 7/31/2002 US GUARDS CO [NC 17,433.71
AP 00186535 7/31/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 8,841.52
AP 00186535 7/31/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 35.65
AP 00186536 7/31/2002 VALDEZ, STEPHANIE 38.00
AP 00186537 7/31/2002 VALIENTE, ENA 37.00
AP 00186538 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 1,650.00
AP 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 44.36
AP 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 44.09
AP 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 87.90
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 25.85
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.71
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.08
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 134.27
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.60
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VEPdZONWIRELESS 71.01
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 34.84
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 26.37
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 44.75
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 101.94
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 77.04
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 47.95
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 244.78
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 28.54
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 76.04
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 229.51
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 27.51
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 27.51
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 70.69
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 39.85
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 31.34
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 206.33
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 51.25
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 19.88
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 70.69
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 51.61
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72
User: cgonzale - Carole GorLzales Page: 11 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: /[ _ 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 28.87
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 27.51
AP-00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.68
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.68
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 27.51
AP-00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 136.64
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 43.81
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERiZON WIRELESS 53.34
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERiZON WIRELESS 43.68
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 45.21
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 V,ERIZON WIRELESS 26.37
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 41.48
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 26.37
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 26.37
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 38.71
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 81.90
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 31.76
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 28.08
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 82.31
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 30.03
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VE1LIZON WIRELESS 74.95
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 70.96
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 27.51
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.08
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 44.75
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 73.48
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 105.15
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 131.63
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.11
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 86.52
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72
AP-00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 16.72
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.68
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VE1LIZON WIRELESS 14.43
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 29.03
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 28.57
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 45.60
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VEPdZON WIRELESS 74.95
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 16.72
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 44.20
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 46.89
AP - 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 145.15
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 23.16
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 99.94
AP- 00186541 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 20.70
AP - 00186542 7/31/2002 VIELMA, SUE 34.20
AP - 00186543 7/31/2002 VIMUTT1NAN, CATHEKINE 43.00
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 581.84
AP- 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 673.32
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 225.00
AP- 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 173.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 12 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 435.12
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 33.12
AP- 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 1,000.00
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 57.12
AP- 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 77.28
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 472.12
AP- 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 225.00
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 258.88
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 291.24
AP - 00186544 7/31/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 426.96
AP - 00186545 7/31/2002 WA,XIE 152.22
AP- 00186545 7/31/2002 WAXIE 39.07
AP- 00186545 7/31/2002 WAXIE 257.08
AP-00186545 7/31/2002 WAXIE 177.13
AP- 00186545 7/31/2002 WAXIE 969.24
AP - 00186545 7/31/2002 WAXIE 514.56
AP - 00186546 7/31/2002 WHEELER, KlM 94.00
AP- 00186547 7/31/2002 WILLIAMS, DAVID 391.50
AP - 00186548 7/31/2002 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 234.72
AP- 00186549 7/31/2002 ZUPKE, CASSANDRA 150.00
AP 00186550 7/31/2002 ZWlSSLER, JAMES 70.00
AP 00186551 7/31/2002 AANDK30M1NPHOTOLABINC 15.13
AP 00186552 7/31/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 143.39
AP 00186553 7/31/2002 ABLAC 294.06
AP 00186554 7/31/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 96.00
AP 00186554 7/31/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,184.00
AP 00186554 7/3t/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,184.00
AP 00186555 7/31/2002 AFP FUNDRAIS1NGDAY 235.00
AP 00186556 7/31/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTERR 216.60
AP - 00186557 7/31/2002 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 29.77
AP - 00186558 7/31/2002 ALWAYS BALLOONS 115.00
AP - 00186559 7/31/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 1,135.89
AP - 00186560 7/31/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 264.00
AP - 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 23.90
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 471.15
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 104.00
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 60.00
AP - 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 242.84
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 70.40
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,250.00
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 635.50
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 285.00
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 227.65
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 134.89
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 77.40
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 154.26
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 35.59
AP - 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 417.00
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 7.50
AP - 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 40.00
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 28.02
AP - 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 234.73
AP- 00186561 7/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 104.00
AP - 00186562 7/31/2002 AUTO RESTORATORS 41 t .42
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 13 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
/.3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ·
AP - 00186563 7/31/2002 BALNEG, RAFAEL 64.45
AP - 00186564 7/31/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 331.72
AP- 00186565 7/31/2002 BDA IE 45.00
AP- 00186566 7/31/2002 CAFE JUSTICE 50.80
AP- 00186567 7/31/2002 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL 43.00
AP- 00186568 7/31/2002 CARLOS OLIVA 500.00
AP - 00186569 7/31/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72
AP - 00186570 7/31/2002 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 5,000.00
AP - 00186571 7/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO 1NC 4.98
AP- 00186571 7/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 85.94
AP - 00186571 7/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 48.87
AP- 00186571 7/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 27.00
AP- 00186572 7/31/2002 CMBTA 150.00
AP- 00186573 7/31/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50
AP - 00186574 7/31/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRICT [NC 1,400.75
AP - 00186575 7/31/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP - 00186576 7/31/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP- 00186577 7/31/2002 CPRS 140.00
AP- 00186578 7/31/2002 DALY, JASON 43.06
AP - 00186579 7/31/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 6,000.00
AP- 00186580 7/31/2002 DE LA MORA, MARIO 105.00
AP- 00186581 7/31/2002 DICK, ERIC 322.50
AP- 00186582 7/31/2002 DIRECTV 27.99
AP- 00186583 7/31/2002 DOUGLAS, ROBSrNN 200.00
AP- 00186584 7/31/2002 DUGAN, ALLISON 350.00
AP- 00186585 7/31/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 252.14
AP- 00186586 7/31/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 2,424.95
AP- 00186587 7/31/2002 ESP[NOZA, JOHNNY 5.00
AP- 00186587 7/31/2002 ESPINOZA, JOHNNY 70.00
AP- 00186588 7/31/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 177.86
AP - 00186588 7/31/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 37.37
AP - 00186589 7/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00
AP - 00186589 7/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 510.00
AP - 00186590 7/31/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1,662.93
AP - 00186590 7/31/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2,148.74
AP- 00186590 7/31/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 48.86
AP - 00186591 7/31/2002 GADABOUT TOURS INC 200.00
AP - 00186591 7/31/2002 GADABOUT TOURS [NC 3,596.40
AP - 00186592 7/31/2002 GAME ROOM GALLERY 47.24
AP-00186593 7/31/2002 GENTRY, DON 196.82
AP- 00186594 7/31/2002 GRANT, JERRY 9,039.00
AP - 00186595 7/31/2002 GKEENWOOD'S UNIFORMS 10.78
AP- 00186596 7/31/2002 GUZMAN, JOSE 108.00
AP 00186597 7/31/2002 HERDA, DAVID 2.97
AP 00186598 7/31/2002 HURST, CHERYL 313.50
AP 00186599 7/31/2002 HURST, JESSICA A 750.00
AP 00186600 7/31/2002 ICBO 10.00
AP 00186601 7/31/2002 JANECK, LINDA 21.32
AP 00186602 7/31/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 48,190.03
AP 00186602 7/31/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 150.66
AP 00186603 7/31/2002 KONG, SOPHEAK 100.42
AP 00186604 7/31/2002 KRUSE, JOANA 970.00
AP 00186605 7/31/2002 LEON, LUIS 197.00
AP 00186606 7/31/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 14 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
lq
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 tbxough 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00186607 7/31/2002 MACLEAN, JAN 500.00
AP 00186608 7/31/2002 MAHMOND, MOHAMED 73.00
AP 00186609 7/31/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 249.07
AP 00186610 7/31/2002 MARWAN BUSTAMI 250.00
AP 00186611 7/31/2002 METRO COOPERATIVE LIBRARY 150.00
AP 00186612 7/31/2002 MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO, PAUL C 1,000.00
AP 00186613 7/31/2002 MORALES, MICHAEL 40.15
AP 00186614 7/31/2002 NMADUESC/OBARBARAWHITE 13.85
AP 00186615 7/31/2002 NASSERKARCHOURI 500.00
AP 00186616 7/31/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 26,302.75
AP 00186617 7/31/2002 NICKUM, GINA 6.00
AP 00186618 7/31/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 92.00
AP 00186619 7/31/2002 OMNITRANS 171.50
AP 00186620 7/31/2002 OTT, LAURA 98.00
AP 00186620 7/31/2002 OTT, LAUR~ 252.00
AP- 00186620 7/31/2002 OTT, LAURA 87.50
AP-00186620 7/31/2002 OTT, LAURA 54.00
AP- 00186621 7/31/2002 OTT, SHARON 70.00
AP - 00186622 7/31/2002 PACIFIC ANIMAL PRODUCTIONS 625.00
AP-00186623 7/31/2002 PEREZ, HECTOR 54.00
AP- 00186624 7/31/2002 PORAC 290.00
AP- 00186625 7/31/2002 PORTER, BOB 150.00
AP- 00186626 7/31/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 89.00
AP - 00186627 7/31/2002 PRECINCT REPORTER 51.00
AP-00186628 7/31/2002 PRESS ENTERPRISE 312.00
AP-00186629 7/31/2002 PR1NCIPALLIFE 15,240.62
AP- 00186629 7/31/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 72,180.60
AP- 00186630 7/31/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP- 00186631 7/31/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 197.00
AP - 00186632 7/31/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 96.53
AP - 00186633 7/31/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBKA 282.50
AP- 00186634 7/31/2002 RESOURCE ONE 42.85
AP-00186635 7/31/2002 RJ-II CONSULTING 1,024.00
AP- 00186635 7/31/2002 RI-II CONSULTING 768.00
AP-00186635 7/31/2002 RHI CONSULTING 1,024.00
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 421.64
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON t,501.50
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,855.98
AP- 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 945.50
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,345.39
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 512.00
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,851.00
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 288.00
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 467.60
AP- 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,572.00
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 387.50
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,604.45
AP- 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,872.50
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 952.25
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 46.50
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,222.00
AP- 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 20.62
AP- 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,733.80
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 15,042.72
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 15 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_ILEG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/l 5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ·
AP - 00186636 7/31/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,326.85
AP- 00186637 7/31/2002 RIVAS-SALAZAR, MARIA 10.00
AP- 00186637 7/31/2002 RIVAS-SALAZAR, MARIA 71.00
AP - 00186638 7/31/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00
AP - 00186639 7/31/2002 ROUTE 66 MAGAZINE 16.00
AP - 00186640 7/31/2002 SAFAVI, SARAH 293.83
AP - 00186641 7/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68
AP - 00186642 7/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 200.00
AP - 00186643 7/31/2002 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 24,040.00
AP - 00186644 7/31/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 55.16
AP - 00186644 7/31/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 55.16
AP - 00186645 7/31/2002 SCAN NATOA 75.00
AP - 00186646 7/31/2002 SEGUY, JACKIE 40.00
AP - 00186647 7/31/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 75.00
AP - 00186647 7/31/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 161.00
AP- 00186647 7/31/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 98.00
AP - 00186648 7/31/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 601.50
AP - 00186648 7/31/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 601.50
AP - 00186648 7/31/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 601.50
AP - 00186648 7/31/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 601.50
AP- 00186649 7/31/2002 SHEA-WALL, MAUKEEN 200.00
AP - 00186650 7/31/2002 SIQUENZA, ERNESTO 81.00
AP - 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 818.61
AP - 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 211.98
AP - 0018665 t 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 119.72
AP - 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 113.73
AP- 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 140.17
AP- 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 66.72
AP- 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND F1NAL 158.76
AP- 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 134.47
AP- 00186651 7/31/2002 SMART AND FINAL 109.35
AP - 00186652 7/31/2002 SMITH, LINDSEY 44.68
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 449.62
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.69
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.48
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.30
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.99
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.12
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERIq CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.92
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.93
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.77
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.46
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.02
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.85
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.59
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.02
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERaN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.47
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.34
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 16 Current Date: 08/15/7:
Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: · 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.18
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 219.15
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 211.35
AP ~ 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.41
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.85
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 501.67
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 174.96
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.05
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.66
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.60
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP- 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.82
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.95
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 266.13
AP - 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.62
AP 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.89
AP 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED1SON 21.39
AP 00186654 7/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,583.76
AP 00186655 7/31/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00
AP 00186656 7/31/2002 TAFOYA, ROBERT 425.00
AP 00186657 7/31/2002 TARGET 20.31
AP 00186658 7/31/2002 TELEWORKS 2,620.00
AP 00186659 7/31/2002 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 139.43
AP 00186659 7/31/2002 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 84.89
AP 00186659 7/31/2002 THOMAS, KIMBERLY 10.89
AP 00186660 7/31/2002 TOBIN, RENEE 7.71
AP 00186661 7/31/2002 TREADWAYGRAPHICS 576.11
AP 00186662 7/31/2002 UNITEDWAY 623.32
AP 00186663 7/31/2002 VALDIVIA, GIANNIVA 5.00
AP 00186663 7/31/2002 VALDIVIA, GIANNIVA 38.00
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 66.12
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 149.61
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 54.15
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.74
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.96
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.90
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 92.80
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 30.00
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.39
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.64
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.04
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.32
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.28
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 26.29
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VER1ZON CALIFORNIA 90.82
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.54
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.20
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 582.57
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 86.33
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 466.49
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 17 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3.
- /7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ·
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 30.88
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.78
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERiZONCALIFORNIA 33.12
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 23.24
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 56.05
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 52.57
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.71
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 61.84
AP-00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 54.02
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 46.58
AP-00186665 7/31/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 28.14
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.96
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.90
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 60.78
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 91.39
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.90
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.96
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.14
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.13
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VEK[ZON CALIFORNIA 24.48
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFOKNIA 28.13
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.23
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.76
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VEP,.IZON CALIFORNIA 56.20
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.52
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 25.49
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VEKIZON CALIFORNIA 28.10
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 94.02
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 32.03
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 59.72
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VEKIZONCALIFORNIA 90.96
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 90.96
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 90.90
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 27.85
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 472.67
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.93
AP 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.96
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.99
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.74
AP- 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.47
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 121.62
AP - 00186665 7/31/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 419.73
AP - 00186666 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 191.63
AP- 00186666 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 247.15
AP- 00186666 7/31/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 104.57
AP - 00186667 7/31/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 480.00
AP- 00186668 7/31/2002 VILAYTHONG, KEOMANEE 103.10
AP- 00186669 7/31/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP- 00186670 7/31/2002 WCISA 455.00
AP- 00186671 7/31/2002 WHITE, LARRY 165.00
AP- 00186672 7/31/2002 WL HOMES LLC 2,500.00
AP - 00186672 7/31/2002 WL HOMES LLC 1,000.00
AP - 00186672 7/31/2002 WL HOMES LLC 500.00
AP - 00186673 7/31/2002 WOOD, ROBBI 20.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 18 Current Date: 08/15/7:
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186674 7/31/2002 WURST, MARK H. 400.00
AP - 00186675 7/31/2002 YAKOUT,AHMED 127.00
AP- 00186676 7/31/2002 YEE, LARRY 93.00
AP - 00186687 8/1/2002 ECLIPSE PRINTING AND GRAPHICS 400.00
AP - 00186720 8/1/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,681.30
AP - 00186728 8/1/2002 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,139.07
AP- 00186730 7/31/2002 SMITH, LINDSEY 44.68
AP - 00186731 8/1/2002 US POSTMASTER 6,500.00
AP - 00186732 8/7/2002 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00186738 8/7/2002 CLABBY, SANDP~k 1,000.00
AP - 00186740 8/7/2002 DE LEISE, IENAE 519.24
AP - 00186741 8/7/2002 DICK, ERIC 2.50
AP - 00186746 8/7/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00
AP - 00186748 8/7/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 8,197.89
AP - 00186754 8/7/2002 RCPFA 4,140.93
AP - 00186757 8/7/2002 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 317.14
AP - 00186778 8/7/2002 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 25.69
AP - 00186778 8/7/2002 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB 1NC t .68
AP - 00186778 8/7/2002 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC 28.32
AP - 00186779 8/7/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO 1NC 16,474.52
AP 00186780 8/7/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 809.17
AP 00186781 8/7/2002 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,225.00
AP 00186781 8/7/2002 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 3,150.00
AP 00186782 8/7/2002 AMERICAN RED CROSS 40.00
AP 00186783 8/7/2002 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 492.02
AP 00186784 8/7/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 3,146.78
AP 00186784 8/7/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 88.73
AP 00186785 8/7/2002 B AND R AUTO SERVICE 326.61
AP 00186786 8/7/2002 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 406.81
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 42.19
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 14.07
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 42.09
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 27.51
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 149.48
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 15.50
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 9.37
AP 00186787 8/7/2002 BRODART BOOKS 4.68
AP 00186788 8/7/2002 BUSINESS AND LEGAL REPORTS INC 320.08
AP 00186789 8/7/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 25.12
AP - 00186789 8/7/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 385.15
AP - 00186789 8/7/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 949.61
AP - 00186790 8/7/2002 CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVENESS 231.25
AP - 00186791 8/7/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 212.52
AP - 00186791 8/7/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 211.00
AP - 00186791 8/7/2002 CHARTER MEDIA 60.48
AP - 00186792 8/7/2002 CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 419.15
AP - 00186793 8/7/2002 CIVIC SOLUTIONS 6,984.00
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 611.39
AP ~ 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 2,684.34
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 3,172.99
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 93.00
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 65.50
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 87.00
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 19 Current Date: 08/15/2-
Report:CK AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ,, 08:3
/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 tkrough 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 69.65
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 131.41
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 671.24
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 357.12
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 357.12
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 1,053.14
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 59.03
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 148.14
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 75.84
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 93.62
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 74.60
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 241.93
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 58.31
AP 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 357.12
AP 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 671.24
AP 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 357.12
AP 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 87.00
AP 00186794 8/7/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 75.78
AP 00186795 8/7/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP 00186795 8/7/2002 COPP CRUSHING COP, P, DAN 30.00
AP 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 206.37
AP 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 44.51
AP 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 205.40
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 655.09
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 67.51
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,408.27
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 149.57
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 212.19
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 204.31
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.64
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 467.99
AP - 00186796 8/7/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 167.23
AP - 00186797 8/7/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 637.23
AP - 00186797 8/7/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,000.00
AP - 00186797 8/7/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,800.00
AP - 00186798 8/7/2002 FINALS, THE 56.23
AP - 00186798 8/7/2002 FINALS, THE 3.73
AP - 00186799 8/7/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 30.33
AP - 00186799 8/7/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2,045.86
AP - 00186800 8/7/2002 FUTURE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS INC 2,793.00
AP - 00186800 8/7/2002 FUTURE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS INC 7,874.37
AP - 00186800 8/7/2002 FUTURE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS INC 1,234.82
AP - 00186801 8/7/2002 H1 WAY SAFETY INC 464.15
AP - 00186802 8/7/2002 HOSE MAN INC 192.18
AP - 00186803 8/7/2002 HRS USA (BEST BUY) 269.34
AP - 00186804 8/7/2002 HRS USA 41.11
AP - 00186805 8/7/2002 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 218.05
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 20 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186806 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 2,840.00
AP - 00186806 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 206.07
AP - 00186806 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 206.07
AP - 00186806 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 35.70
AP - 00186807 8/7/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 178.41
AP - 00186807 8/7/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 178.41
AP - 00186807 8/7/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 278.97
AP - 00186808 8/7/2002 1NNES, CRAIG 38.00
AP - 00186809 8/7/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 25,675.11
AP 00186810 8/7/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 621.00
AP 00186811 8/7/2002 JD C 1NC 10,467.66
AP 00186812 8/7/2002 J J KELLER AND ASSOC 1NC 118.79
AP 00186813 8/7/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 134.69
AP 00186813 8/7/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 363.73
AP 00186814 8/7/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 59.74
AP 00186815 8/7/2002 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 18,872.00
AP 00186816 8/7/2002 KLINGFUS, BELINDA 5.00
AP 00186816 8/7/2002 KLINGFUS, BELINDA 30.00
AP 00186817 8/7/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 754.40
AP 00186818 8/7/2002 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 24,201.60
AP - 00186819 8/7/2002 LASHIN, DIANA 38.00
AP - 00186820 8/7/2002 LIGORRIA, DEENA 3.80
AP - 00186821 8/7/2002 LILLEY, TERESA 36.00
AP - 00186822 8/7/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5 1.00
AP - 00186822 8/7/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,603.86
AP - 00186822 8/7/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICUL2ZFP,.AL ENT 1NC 4,899.00
AP - 00186822 8/7/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 10,539.52
AP - 00186823 8/7/2002 MDM T SHIRT AND PROMO 2,502.75
AP - 00186824 8/7/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 44.98
AP - 00186824 8/7/2002 MIDWEST TAPE I47.92
AP - 00186825 8/7/2002 MITY LITE 1,972.20
AP - 00186826 8/7/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 69.17
AP - 00186827 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 253.55
AP - 00186827 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 607.51
AP - 00186827 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 390.53
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 105.55
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 163.41
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 129.20
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 175.13
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 3.48
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 22.38
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 19.79
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 25.00
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 11.84
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1,500.29
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 67.85
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 243.11
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 266.07
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 55.38
AP - 00I 86828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 103.34
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9.54
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.40
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 249.42
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1,118.53
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 21 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
£/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount'
AP - 00186828 8/7/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 52.06
AP - 00186829 8/7/2002 PARSAC 120.00
AP - 00186829 8/7/2002 PARSAC 345.00
AP - 00186829 8/7/2002 PARSAC 10,861.03
AP - 00186829 8/7/2002 PARSAC 6,068.37
AP - 00186829 8/7/2002 PARSAC 300.00
AP - 00186830 8/7/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,661.41
AP - 00186831 8/7/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4;766.94
AP - 00186831 8/7/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,777.65
AP - 00186832 8/7/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 51.41
AP - 00186833 8/7/2002 PSOMAS 2,545.62
AP - 00186834 8/7/2002 RAMOS, NATALIA 3.80
AP - 00186835 8/7/2002 RODRIGUEZ, ALICIA 89.10
AP - 00186836 8/7/2002 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 505.08
AP - 00186837 8/7/2002 RUIZ, ERNEST 303.50
AP - 00186838 8/7/2002 S AND S WORLDWIDE 55.70
AP - 00186839 8/7/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 1,079.85
AP - 00186840 8/7/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 12,500.00
AP - 00186841 8/7/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 196.11
AP - 00186841 8/7/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 318.94
AP - 00186841 8/7/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO ]NC 443.93
AP - 00186841 8/7/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 318.94
AP - 00186841 8/7/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO [NC 318.94
AP - 00186842 8/7/2002 SHERW]N WILLIAMS 74.79
AP - 00186842 8/7/2002 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 250.40
AP - 00186843 8/7/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 129.80
AP - 00186843 8/7/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 95.25
AP - 00186843 8/7/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 286.25
AP - 00186843 8/7/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 276.00
AP - 00186843 8/7/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 242.50
AP - 00186844 8/7/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 328.30
AP - 00186845 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28,890.60
AP - 00186845 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,352.89
AP - 00186846 8/7/2002 SPEEDO ELECTRIC CO 432.72
AP - 00186847 8/7/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6,537.64
AP - 00186848 8/7/2002 STATE OF CALIF 170.39
AP - 00186848 8/7/2002 STATE OF CALIF 1,088.00
AP - 00186848 8/7/2002 STATE OF CALIF 1,173.61
AP - 00186848 8/7/2002 STATE OF CALIF 640.00
AP - 00186848 8/7/2002 STATE OF CALIF 2,272.00
AP - 00186849 8/7/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 2,600.62
AP - 00186849 8/7/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 513.11
AP - 00186849 8/7/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS -557.34
AP - 00186850 8/7/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 175.00
AP - 00186850 8/7/2002 TERM]NIX INTERNATIONAL 52.00
AP - 00186850 8/7/2002 TERM1NIX INTERNATIONAL 135.00
AP - 00186851 8/7/2002 UNIQUE CREATIONS 686.91
AP - 00186852 8/7/2002 VERIZON WIP, ZLESS 82.26
AP - 00186853 8/7/2002 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 489.04
AP - 00186854 8/7/2002 VOSS, CAROLYNN 47.82
AP - 00186855 8/7/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 391.50
AP - 00186856 8/7/2002 WEARGUARD 69.86
AP - 00186856 8/7/2002 WEARGUARD 161.73
AP - 00186856 8/7/2002 WEARGUARD 210.09
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 22 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00186857 8/7/2002 WOODHOUSE, MILLY 90.00
AP 00186858 8/7/2002 X PECT FIRST AID AND SAFETY 59.05
AP 00186859 8/7/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 802.49
AP 00186859 8/7/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,002.09
AP 00186860 8/7/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 38.22
AP 00186860 8/7/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 64.04
AP 00186861 8/7/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 131.00
AP 00186861 8/7/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 131.00
AP 00186861 8/7/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 252.23
AP 00186861 8/7/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 330.80
AP 00186861 8/7/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 131.00
AP - 00186862 8/7/2002 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT 1NC 284.46
AP - 00186863 8/7/2002 ALWAYS BALLOONS 115.00
AP - 00186863 8/7/2002 ALWAYS BALLOONS 115.00
AP - 00186864 8/7/2002 AMERICAN RED CROSS 540.00
AP - 00186865 8/7/2002 ASSI SECURITY 105.00
AP - 00186866 8/7/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 317.50
AP - 00186866 8/7/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 125.00
AP - 00186867 8/7/2002 BACIAA 700.00
AP - 00186868 8/7/2002 BALLY TOTAL FITNESS CORPORATION 2,253.75
AP - 00186869 8/7/2002 BRUCE, 1NGRID 56.05
AP - 00186870 8/7/2002 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 213.69
AP - 00186871 8/7/2002 CALPELRA 395.00
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 436.25
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 677.84
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 1,080.00
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 1,000.00
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 120.00
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 1,000.00
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 355.25
AP - 00186872 8/7/2002 CALSENSE 544.00
AP - 00186873 8/7/2002 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,235.72
AP - 00186874 8/7/2002 CLARK, DEBORAH 20.98
AP - 00186875 8/7/2002 CLOUD, DON 1,500.00
AP - 00186876 8/7/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 61.33
AP ~ 00186876 8/7/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 428.94
AP - 00186877 8/7/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 443.71
AP - 00186877 8/7/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS I 596.29
AP - 00186878 8/7/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00
AP - 00186878 8/7/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 50.00
AP - 00186878 8/7/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 50.00
AP - 00186879 8/7/2002 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION IN MGT. 598.00
AP - 00186880 8/7/2002 CPRS 125.00
AP - 00186881 8/7/2002 DE LA MORA, MARIO 105.00
AP - 00186882 8/7/2002 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 95.58
AP - 00186882 8/7/2002 DIETERiCH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 286.34
AP - 00186883 8/7/2002 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 283.38
AP - 00186883 8/7/2002 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 5,769.26
AP - 00186884 8/7/2002 DPDG FUND I11, LLC 131.96
AP - 00186885 8/7/2002 DUGAN, ALLISON 109.31
AP - 00186886 8/7/2002 EASTER, PAMELA 5.48
AP - 00186886 8/7/2002 EASTER, PAMELA 69.22
AP - 00186887 8/7/2002 ELMO DATA SUPPLY INC 365.89
AP - 00186888 8/7/2002 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA EDUCATIONAL S 100.36
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 23 Current Date: 08/15/7:
Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porn-aR Layout Time: 08:3
2.3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP - 00186888 8/7/2002 ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA EDUCATIONAL ~' 1,344.00
AP - 00186889 8/7/2002 ESCOBAR, SANTIAGO 35.00
AP - 00186890 8/7/2002 ESRI INC 400.00
AP - 00186891 8/7/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 219.65
AP - 00186891 8/7/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 526.90
AP - 00186891 8/7/2002 EWI-NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 602.02
AP - 00186891 8/7/2002 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 146.63
AP - 00186892 8/7/2002 FILARSKY AND WATT 300.00
AP - 00186893 8/7/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP - 00186893 8/7/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,080.00
AP - 00186893 8/7/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP - 00186894 8/7/2002 FLEET GLASS 253.27
AP - 00186895 8/7/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 105.15
AP - 00186896 8/7/2002 GUARDIAN 2,932.90
AP - 00186897 8/7/2002 HEYDE, DONALD 417.12
AP - 00186898 8/7/2002 HINRICHSEN, BARBARA 3,000.00
AP - 00186899 8/7/2002 HOLGU1N, MICHAEL 100.00
AP - 00186900 8/7/2002 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP 1,094.50
AP - 00186901 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 35.70
AP - 00186901 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 206.07
AP - 00186901 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 124.88
AP - 00186901 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 35.70
AP - 00186901 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 47.60
AP - 00186901 8/7/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 114.05
AP - 00186902 8/7/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1,321.50
AP - 00186902 8/7/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 663.31
AP - 00186903 8/7/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 46,501.56
AP - 00186904 8/7/2002 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 136.33
AP - 00186905 8/7/2002 KELLY, SEAN 37.17
AP - 00186906 8/7/2002 KERILINGTON BEDDING [NC 435.00
AP - 00186907 8/7/2002 KIM, KAY 74.00
AP - 00186908 8/7/2002 KING, BRENDA 160.00
AP - 00186909 8/7/2002 KINKOS COPIES 483.91
AP - 00186909 8/7/2002 KINKOS COPIES 483.90
AP - 00186910 8/7/2002 KINKOS COPIES 96.98
AP - 00186911 8/7/2002 KRUEPER, MICHELE 330.00
AP - 00186912 8/7/2002 LA VOZ 96.00
AP - 00186913 8/7/2002 LAM, JACK 26.61
AP - 00186914 8/7/2002 LEON, LUIS 127.00
AP - 00186915 8/7/2002 LEWIS OPERATING CORP 19.00
AP- 00186916 8/7/2002 LIL STITCH 367.11
AP - 00186917 8/7/2002 MEYER, PAT 750.00
AP - 00186918 8/7/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 96.00
AP - 00186918 8/7/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 96.00
AP - 00186919 8/7/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46
AP - 00186919 8/7/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 130.38
AP - 00186919 8/7/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67
AP - 00186919 8/7/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67
AP - 00186920 8/7/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.51
AP - 00186920 8/7/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 235.81
AP - 00186920 8/7/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 92.65
AP - 00186920 8/7/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 185.77
AP - 00186920 8/7/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 105.37
AP ~ 00186921 8/7/2002 NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION 25.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 24 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
,gq
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186922 8/7/2002 NCVC MSA 400.00
AP - 00186923 8/7/2002 NETWORK INSTRUMENTS 307.00
AP - 00186924 8/7/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 127.00
AP - 00186925 8/7/2002 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 46.00
AP - 00186926 8/7/2002 NWOKEABIA JESSIE 114.00
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 131.39
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 23.02
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 5.32
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 392.38
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 16.66
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -112.29
AP - 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 48.24
AP 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 28.60
AP 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 7.70
AP 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 144.70
AP 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 405.47
AP 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -47.41
AP 00186927 8/7/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 106.81
AP 00186928 8/7/2002 PARSAC 4,511.95
AP 00186929 8/7/2002 PEREZ, HECTOR 35.00
AP 00186930 8/7/2002 PHILLIPS, HILDA 14.42
AP 00186931 8/7/2002 PMI 1,093.00
AP - 00186932 8/7/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 1,204.65
AP - 00186933 8/7/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 100.00
AP - 00186934 8/7/2002 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 9,000.00
AP - 00186935 8/7/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 193.00
AP - 00186936 8/7/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 60.56
AP - 00186936 8/7/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 46.66
AP - 00186937 8/7/2002 REDINGER, TOM 100.00
AP - 00186938 8/7/2002 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 13.23
AP - 00186938 8/7/2002 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 158.84
AP - 00186939 8/7/2002 RIVAS, MIGUEL 100.00
AP - 00186940 8/7/2002 RODRIGUEZ, JESSICA 25.00
AP - 00186941 8/7/2002 SAFECO INS CO GROUP ADMIN 1,818.00
AP - 00186942 8/7/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00
AP - 00186942 8/7/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 150.00
AP - 00186943 8/7/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 759.40
AP - 00186943 8/7/2002 SHALIMAR TOURS AND CHARTER 601.50
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,449.44
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,516.86
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,505.69
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.42
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.59
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 243.41
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 164.07
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.98
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.70
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.85
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 215.92
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,515.75
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.34
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 25 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
.25
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.01
AP ~ 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.18
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.77
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.86
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159.96
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.81
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.01
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33,038.73
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.07
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.60
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.33
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,758.22
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 602.01
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 200.67
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.27
AP ~ 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.87
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.41
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.07
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 165~47
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.60
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.95
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.81
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.09
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.59
AP - 00 186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.93
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.18
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.13
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.64
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.96
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.17
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.04
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.55
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.73
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.75
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.90
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 26 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALII~0RNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHEP,,N CALIFORNIA EDI S ON 12.73
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.79
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.40
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 27.77
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.85
AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25
' AP 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.46
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.58
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.58
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.19
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.80
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.27
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.79
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.00
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.14
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.25
AP - 00186946 8/7/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERICYCLE 1NC 96.98
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERiCYCLE 1NC 52.50
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERICYCLE INC 52.50
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98
AP - 00186947 8/7/2002 STERICYCLE INC 96.98
AP - 00186948 8/7/2002 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 297.67
AP - 00186948 8/7/2002 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 357.67
AP - 00186949 8/7/2002 STEVENS, MICHELE 1,500.00
AP - 00186950 8/7/2002 SUNRISE FORD 91.63
AP - 00186950 8/7/2002 SUNRISE FORD 140.60
AP - 00186950 8/7/2002 SUNRISE FORD 85.53
AP - 00186950 8/7/2002 SUNRISE FORD 87.01
AP - 00186950 8/7/2002 SUNRISE FORD 266.22
AP - 00186951 8/7/2002 SUNRISE TRADING CO 872.00
AP - 00186952 8/7/2002 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 734.15
AP - 00186952 8/7/2002 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 75.00
AP - 00186953 8/7/2002 T L PRO 187.00
AP - 00186954 8/7/2002 T S C G (TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICE~, 313.28
AP - 00186955 8/7/2002 TAFOYA, ROBERT 375.00
AP - 00186956 8/7/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,332.67
AP - 00186957 8/7/2002 TARGET 60.30
AP - 00186958 8/7/2002 TELEWORKS 5,200.00
AP - 00186959 8/7/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 56.00
AP - 00186959 8/7/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 135.00
AP - 00186959 8/7/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 162.00
AP - 00186959 8/7/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 67.00
AP ~ 00186960 8/7/2002 TETRA TECH ASL INC 17,856.93
AP ~ 00186961 8/7/2002 TOBIN, RENEE 7.71
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 27 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
077
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount '
AP - 00186962 8/7/2002 U S BANK TRUST 219,319.63
AP - 00186962 8/7/2002 U S BANK TRUST 153,523.74
AP - 00186962 8/7/2002 U S BANK TRUST 394,775.33
AP - 00186962 8/7/2002 U S BANK TRUST 1,425,577.59
AP - 00186963 8/7/2002 U S BANK TRUST 150,935.30
AP - 00186963 8/7/2002 U S BANK TRUST 613,740.00
AP - 00186964 8/7/2002 UNIGLOBE PLAZA TRAVEL 71.13
AP - 00186965 8/7/2002 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 344.49
AP - 00186966 8/7/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 58.43
AP - 00186966 8/7/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 38.98
AP - 00186966 8/7/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 72.11
AP - 00186967 8/7/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 331.10
AP - 00186968 8/7/2002 VEPAZON WIRELESS 14.08
AP - 00186969 8/7/2002 V1DEOLAB CASSETTE INC 106.00
AP - 00186971 8/7/2002 VILAYTHONG, KEOMANEE 206.20
AP - 00186972 8/7/2002 WAKEFIELD, AMBRA 500.00
AP - 00186973 8/7/2002 WARREN AND CO, CARL 89.60
AP - 00186974 8/7/2002 WAXIE 804.16
AP - 00186974 8/7/2002 WAXIE 68.03
AP - 00186975 8/7/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 31,172.96
AP - 00186975 8/7/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 69,920.98
AP - 00186975 8/7/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 274,498.72
AP - 00186976 8/7/2002 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 7,200.00
AP - 00186977 8/7/2002 WOODSIDE HOMES/WOODSIDE BELMONT SAL 4,500.00
AP - 00186978 8/7/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00186978 8/7/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 1,794.04
AP - 00186978 8/7/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53
AP - 00186979 8/7/2002 YAKOUT,AHMED 157.00
AP - 00186980 8/7/2002 YEE, LARRY 80.00
AP- 00186981 8/7/2002 ZENDEJAS, IRMA 15.13
AP ~ 00186982 8/8/2002 SETO, KARA 348.30
AP - 00186983 8/8/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 11,055.00
AP - 00186983 8/8/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 60,253.82
AP ~ 00186984 8/12/2002 DOUGLAS, ROBYNN 425.00
AP- 00186985 8/13/2002 DISNEYLAND 1,595.00
AP- 00186986 8/14/2002 2002 CCPOA CONFERENCE 390.00
AP - 00186987 8/14/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 386.95
AP - 00186987 8/14/2002 A AND R TIRE' SERVICE 1,186.16
AP- 00186988 8/14/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 89.00
AP- 00186988 8/14/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 18.10
AP- 00186989 8/14/2002 ABLAC 294.06
AP- 00186990 8/14/2002 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT INC 784.04
AP- 00186991 8/14/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,280.00
AP-00186991 8/14/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,280.00
AP - 00186992 8/14/2002 AG ENGINEERING INC 463.12
AP- 00186992 8/14/2002 AG ENGINEERING 1NC 463.12
AP-00186993 8/14/2002 ALLWELDING 180.00
AP - 00186994 8/14/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 205.77
AP- 00186995 8/14/2002 ALPHAGRAPHICS 322.98
AP- 00186996 8/14/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 367.92
AP- 00186996 8/14/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 404.01
AP - 00186996 8/14/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 391.98
AP- 00186997 8/14/2002 ALWAYS BALLOONS 115.00
AP - 00186998 8/14/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 535.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 28 Current Date: 08/15/S.
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00186998 8/14/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 140.68
AP - 00186998 8/14/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 391.00
AP - 00186999 8/14/2002 ARBOR NURSERY [NC 4,105.28
AP - 00187000 8/14/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 154.03
AP- 00187000 8/14/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 497.39
AP- 00187000 8/14/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,023.63
AP - 00187001 8/14/2002 ASSI SECURITY 125.00
AP - 00187002 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 41.25
AP- 00187002 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 619.56
AP - 00187002 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 127.95
AP - 00187002 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 619.56
AP - 00187002 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 97.70
AP - 00187002 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 37.60
AP - 00187003 8/14/2002 BENDER AND CO 1NC, MATTHEW 269.38
AP - 00187004 8/14/2002 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,012.47
AP- 00187005 8/14/2002 BERNELL HYDRAULICS [NC 43.26
AP- 00187006 8/14/2002 BLACKMAN, GUY 800.00
AP - 00187007 8/14/2002 BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE [NC 2,492.50
AP- 00187008 8/14/2002 BROCK, ALLEN 50.00
AP - 00187009 8/14/2002 BUCHANAN, JANICE 54.52
AP- 00187010 8/14/2002 CALBO 270.00
AP- 00187011 8/14/2002 CAPRCBM 165.00
AP - 00187012 8/14/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72
AP- 00187013 8/14/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 64.57
AP- 00187013 8/14/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 82.49
AP- 00187014 8/14/2002 CITY RENTALS 36.45
AP - 00187015 8/14/2002 COAST RECREATION INC 930.26
AP - 00187016 8/14/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 24.82
AP- 00187016 8/14/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 16.67
AP- 00187016 8/14/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 58.23
AP- 00187016 8/14/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 22.54
AP- 00187017 8/14/2002 COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY 34.47
AP- 00187018 8/14/2002 COMSERCO [NC. 180.48
AP - 00187018 8/14/2002 COMSERCO [NC. 351.80
AP- 00187019 8/14/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50
AP - 00187020 8/14/2002 COOPER, BOB 1,800.00
AP - 00187021 8/14/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP- 00187021 8/14/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00
AP- 00187021 8/14/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 10.00
AP- 00187022 8/14/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP - 00187023 8/14/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 560.33
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 522.58
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,051.29
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,05t.30
AP- 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 4,153.82
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 828.49
AP- 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,628.80
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,644.25
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,466.06
AP- 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,999.21
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 931.49
AP - 00187024 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,692.33
AP - 00187025 8/14/2002 DE LA MORA, MARLO 120.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 29 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ·
AP- 00187026 8/14/2002 DEL MECHANICAL 135.00
AP- 00187027 8/14/2002 DETCO 64.65
AP - 00187028 8/14/2002 DICK, ERIC 322.50
AP- 00187029 8/14/2002 DLT SOLUTIONS [NC 2,619.05
AP- 00187030 8/14/2002 DUGAN, ALLISON 225.00
AP - 00187031 8/14/2002 EICON INC 1,310.85
AP - 00187032 8/14/2002 EMPIILE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 877.13
AP - 00187033 8/14/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 1,765.08
AP- 00187034 8/14/2002 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,540.00
AP- 00187034 8/14/2002 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,540.00
AP- 00187035 8/14/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 292.54
AP - 00187035 8/14/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 671.38
AP - 00187035 8/14/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 43.29
AP- 00187036 8/14/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.20
AP - 00187036 8/14/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.06
AP- 00187036 8/14/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.38
AP - 00187037 8/14/2002 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE [NC 140.00
AP - 00187038 8/14/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00
AP- 00187039 8/14/2002 FIRSTPLACE TROPHIES 1,618.00
AP 00187040 8/14/2002 FUTURECOMPUT[NGSOLUTIONSINC 1,164.87
AP 00187041 8/14/2002 GADABOUT TOURS 1NC 752.00
AP 00187041 8/14/2002 GADABOUT TOURS INC 200.00
AP 00187042 8/14/2002 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 103.56
AP 00187043 8/14/2002 GRAINGER, WW 554.28
AP 00187043 8/t4/2002 GRAINGER, WW 138.55
AP 00187044 8/14/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 206.51
AP 00187044 8/14/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 103.16
AP 00187045 8/14/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 347.20
AP 00187045 8/14/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 377.60
AP 00187046 8/14/2002 HARMONY ARTISTS INC 900.00
AP 00187047 8/14/2002 HOMESAFE INC 500.00
AP 00187048 8/14/2002 HOPKINS, LORI 600.00
AP 00187049 8/14/2002 HOSE MAN INC 9.79
AP 00187050 8/14/2002 HURST, CHERYL 313.50
AP 00187051 8/14/2002 HYDROSCAPEPRODUCTSINC 88.90
AP 00187051 8/14/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 417.90
AP 00187052 8/14/2002 ID BURR 23.71
AP 00187052 8/14/2002 IDBURR 53.98
AP 00187053 8/14/2002 IRILIAN, MOE 100.00
AP 00187054 8/14/2002 KANIA-LLOYD, JAMIE 142.40
AP 00187055 8/14/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC l,t84.26
AP - 00187055 8/14/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 2,435.79
AP- 00187055 8/14/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 1,030.59
AP- 00187056 8/14/2002 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 54.00
AP - 00187057 8/14/2002 KELLY, SEAN 1,500.00
AP- 00187058 8/14/2002 KLAUS AND SONS 175.00
AP- 00187059 8/14/2002 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 375.00
AP- 00187060 8/14/2002 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 2.52
AP - 00187061 8/14/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 90.76
AP- 00187061 8/14/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 717.48
AP - 00187061 8/14/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 97.72
AP - 00187061 8/14/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 596.53
AP - 00187061 8/14/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 41.25
AP - 00187061 8/14/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 131.60
User: cgo~tzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 30 Current Date: 08/15/7:
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00187062 8/14/2002 LEON, LUIS 227.00
AP - 00187063 8/14/2002 LETS STOR IT 540.00
AP - 00187064 8/14/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 352.00
AP- 00187064 8/14/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 792.00
AP- 00187064 8/14/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 4,928.00
AP - 00187065 8/14/2002 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 650.00
AP - 00187066 8/14/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 204.40
AP - 00187067 8/14/2002 LOS ANGELES TIMES 19.40
AP- 00187067 8/14/2002 LOS ANGELES TIMES 19.40
AP- 00187068 8/14/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00
AP- 00187069 8/14/2002 MARTtNEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00187069 8/14/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP- 00187070 8/14/2002 MATT'S HARDWARE 54.44
AP - 00187071 8/14/2002 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 314.13
AP - 00187071 8/14/2002 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 131.46
AP- 00187072 8/14/2002 METAL ROOFING WHOLESALE 523.80
AP- 00187073 8/14/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 240.00
AP- 00187074 8/14/2002 MILLAY, HOLLY 38.00
AP- 00187075 8/14/2002 MILLER, KAREN 70.00
AP- 00187076 8/14/2002 MISSION REPORGRAPHICS 103.71
AP - 00187077 8/14/2002 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 144.68
AP- 00187078 8/14/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 34.94
AP- 00187078 8/14/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 242.00
AP- 00187078 8/14/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 96.75
AP- 00187079 8/14/2002 MURAD, MAY 38.00
AP - 00187080 8/14/2002 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 13.85
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 22.61
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 224.99
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 136.58
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 23.68
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.75
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 53.54
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.69
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 40.69
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 77.52
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 71.05
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 8.78
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 191.43
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -312.31
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -6.23
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 66.62
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.98
AP - 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 66.46
AP- 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 33.09
AP 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -22.61
AP 00187081 8/14/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.23
AP 00187082 8/14/2002 NARIO, CHRiSTINA 4.50
AP 00187082 8/14/2002 NAR10, CHRISTINA 12.00
AP 00187083 8/14/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45
AP 00187084 8/14/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 25,854.69
AP 00187085 8/14/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 108.00
AP - 00187086 8/14/2002 NPELRA 36.00
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -3.89
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 349.27
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales' Page: 31 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount ·
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 28.44
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 293.23
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 123.12
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 59.33
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 308.80
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 37.73
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 12.29
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 30.94
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 2.67
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 18.04
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 69.84
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 36.44
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 20.00
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 28.72
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 44.14
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 2,.33
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 92.11
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 41.40
AP- 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 58.21
AP - 00187087 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 958.15
AP- 00187088 8/14/2002 OFFICE MAX 36.60
AP - 00187089 8/14/2002 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35
AP - 00187090 8/14/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 3.01
AP - 00187090 8/14/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 18.58
AP - 00187091 8/14/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 7.24
AP- 00187092 8/14/2002 PACIFIC BUSINESS CAPITAL CORP 80.00
AP- 00187093 8/14/2002 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 1,019.69
AP- 00187093 8/14/2002 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 334.71
AP - 00187094 8/14/2002 PAPER DIRECT INC 47.53
AP - 00187095 8/14/2002 PARKER, ANDEE 1.00
AP- 00187096 8/14/2002 PC MAGAZINE 25.00
AP- 00187097 8/14/2002 PEP BOYS 16.60
AP- 00187097 8/14/2002 PEP BOYS 44.07
AP- 00187098 8/14/2002 PHAROAHS LOST KINGDOM 705.75
AP- 00187099 8/14/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,521.44
AP- 00187100 8/14/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 316.76
AP- 00187101 8/14/2002 PORTOSAN 50.48
AP- 00187102 8/14/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 100.00
AP- 00187103 8/14/2002 PRESTIGE HOMES 1,717.75
AP- 00187104 8/14/2002 PRICE APPRAISAL COMPANY, WILLIAM 250.00
AP- 00187105 8/14/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP- 00187105 8/14/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 36.60
AP- 00187105 8/14/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP- 00187106 8/14/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 8.62
AP- 00187106 8/14/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 49.57
AP- 00187107 8/14/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP - 00187108 8/14/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 73.26
AP- 00187109 8/14/2002 RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO 424.20
AP- 00187110 8/14/2002 KADULESCU, DAN 127.00
AP - 00187111 8/14/2002 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 128.88
AP - 00187112 8/14/2002 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY/POWERPLAN 26.74
AP - 00187113 8/14/2002 REDINGER, TOM 57.00
AP- 00187114 8/14/2002 REGAL INDUSTRIES INC 7,725.00
AP - 00187115 8/14/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 32 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00187116 8/14/2002 RiVER BLUE (RAGING SUN) 900.00
AP 00187117 8/t4/2002 RiVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 16.70
AP 00187117 8/14/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 1,217.78
AP 00187118 8/14/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00
AP 00187119 8/14/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 52.50
AP 00187119 8/14/2002 ROBLES SR, RAULP 50.00
AP- 00187120 8/14/2002 ROIG, WILLIAM I00.00
AP- 00187121 8/14/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 285.60
AP- 00187121 8/14/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 285.60
AP - 00187122 8/14/2002 SAFAVI, SARAH 304.14
AP - 00187123 8/14/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERiALS 1,639.79
AP - 00187123 8/14/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 3,816.05
AP - 00187124 8/14/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68
AP - 00187125 8/I4/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 220.00
AP - 00187126 8/14/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 3,902.57
AP - 00187126 8/14/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 1,370.98
AP - 00187126 8/14/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 1,140.64
AP - 00187127 8/14/2002 SIGN SHOP, THE 592.63
AP - 00187128 8/14/2002 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,178.62
AP - 00187128 8/14/2002 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 278.64
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND FINAL 323.07
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND F1NAL 72.68
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND FINAL 315.82
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND FINAL 591.78
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND FINAL 68.82
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND FINAL 971.57
AP - 00187129 8/14/2002 SMART AND FINAL 96.65
AP - 00187130 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 61.84
AP - 00187130 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 51.03
AP- 00187130 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 45.48
AP - 00187130 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 53.13
AP - 00187131 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 54,579.33
AP - 00187132 8/14/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 127.52
AP - 00187132 8/14/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 100.52
AP - 00187132 8/14/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,413.13
AP - 00187133 8/14/2002 SORRELL, JODI 282.43
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.07
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.29
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.22
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.98
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.12
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.64
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.02
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.92
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.33
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.88
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.06
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.54
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.57
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.55
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 33 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount'
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.49
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.69
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.26
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 160.63
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 175.98
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.98
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.05
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.07
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 220.95
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.68
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.22
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.11
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.22
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.95
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.41
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.17
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.47
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.94
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.76
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.84
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.72
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.34
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.98
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.58
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.59
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.91
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.55
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.49
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.71
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.35
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.23
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.98
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.85
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.21
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.44
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,82
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.56
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.44
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.38
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 34 Current Date: 08/15/$
Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ~)8:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/l 5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.85
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.42
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.97
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.16
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.67
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.87
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,032.61
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157.27
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 543.36
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.09
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ' 14.18
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.63
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.85
AP 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.32
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.22
AP - 00187136 8/t4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.41
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.22
AP - 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.89
AP- 00187136 8/14/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00187137 8/14/2002 STAGE SYSTEMS 3,029.00
AP - 00187138 8/14/2002 STATE NET 275.00
AP - 00187139 8/14/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOAR 95.17
AP - 00187140 8/14/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00
AP- 00187141 8/14/2002 TARGET 83.61
AP- 00187142 8/14/2002 TOOLS R US 123.46
AP-00187143 8/14/2002 TREADWAYGRAPHICS 486.00
AP- 00187144 8/14/2002 U C REGENTS 20.61
AP- 00187145 8/14/2002 U T I 81.54
AP - 00187146 8/14/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 240.00
AP - 00187146 8/14/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,969.00
AP- 00187147 8/14/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 26.96
AP - 00187147 8/14/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 36.22
AP- 00187148 8/14/2002 UNITED WAY 623.32
AP - 00187149 8/14/2002 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 1,095.82
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.63
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.14
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 384.12
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.74
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.13
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 49.65
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 108.79
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.60
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 35 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC o CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
,_35
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 t~ough 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount'
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.60
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VER1ZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.74
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 54.27
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.14
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 371.27
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 9t.01
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 92.39
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 92.40
AP- 00187152 8/t4/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 84.56
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.0l
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.00
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VER1ZON CALIFORNIA 28.69
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.90
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA '84.47
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 42.80
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 77.89
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 212.85
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 474.06
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 466.78
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.04
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.04
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,314.06
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.04
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 263.18
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.21
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 70.36
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 5.99
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.95
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.90
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.65
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 174.44
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.35
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 66.13
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.60
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.30
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.74
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.33
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.64
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.04
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VER1ZON CALIFORNIA 29.14
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.74
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VER1ZON CALIFORNIA 4t.50
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.74
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 22.74
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 176.73
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.72
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 129.20
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 30.09
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 22.27
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.83
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.14
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.60
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 36 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.60
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.23
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.74
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERiZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP - 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.13
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.01
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 61.37
AP- 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.95
AP 00187152 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 89.60
AP 00187153 8/14/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 10.00
AP 00187154 8/14/2002 VERMEER CALIFORNIA 133.50
AP 00187156 8/14/2002 VILAYTHONG, KEOMANEE 298.99
AP 00187157 8/14/2002 VILLALUZ, TED 100.00
AP 00187158 8/14/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 927.93
AP 00187159 8/14/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP - 00187160 8/14/2002 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 791.45
AP - 00187161 8/14/2002 WAXIE 290.07
AP- 00187161 8/14/2002 WAXIE 267.54
AP- 00187161 8/14/2002 WAXIE 160.76
AP- 00187161 8/14/2002 WAXIE 360.17
AP - 00187161 8/14/2002 WAXIE 101.10
AP - 00187162 8/14/2002 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS INC 316.12
AP ~ 00187163 8/14/2002 WHITE CAP 56.35
AP- 00187164 8/14/2002 WHITE, LARRY 100.00
AP- 00187165 8/14/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 12,164.95
AP- 00187165 8/14/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 175.18
AP- 00187165 8/14/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 359.03
AP- 00187165 8/14/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 166.47
AP - 00187165 8/14/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 1,282.23
AP- 00187165 8/14/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 72.89
AP - 00187166 8/14/2002 YAKOUT,AHMED 127.00
AP - 00187167 8/14/2002 YEE, LARRY 95.00
AP- 00187168 8/14/2002 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 67.19
AP- 00187169 8/14/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 248.01
AP - 00187169 8/14/2002 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO AND TRUCK 708.92
AP - 00187170 8/14/2002 ALLEN'S BOOTS 121.20
AP- 00187171 8/14/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 437.00
AP- 00187172 8/14/2002 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,181.38
AP- 00187173 8/14/2002 ASSI SECURITY 840.00
AP - 00187174 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 49.36
AP - 00187174 8/14/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 200.00
AP- 00187175 8/14/2002 BEE REMOVERS 265.00
AP - 00187176 8/t4/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 2,166.86
AP - 00187177 8/14/2002 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 993.30
AP - 00187177 8/14/2002 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 1,319.67
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 302.38
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 14.78
AP - 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 204.82
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 660.50
AP - 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,245.40
AP - 00187178 8/14/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 78.12
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 37 Current Date: 08/15/7:
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount'
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 14.18
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 293.28
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 196.46
AP - 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 374.93
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,339.60
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 894.58
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 14.18
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 633.54
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVE LP 290.04
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,396.59
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVE LP 14.78
AP- 00187178 8/14/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVE LP 305.75
AP- 00187179 8/14/2002 CLASSIC STITCHWEAR 33.43
AP - 00187179 8/14/2002 CLASSIC STITCHWEAR 3,016.14
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 419.13
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 240.00
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.58
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 96.01
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 483.44
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.49
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 130.14
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,099.95
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 40.96
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCA.MONGA CO WATER DIST 1,385.71
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 270.05
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 498.77
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 55.20
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,718.41
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 451.13
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.09
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 270.04
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 117.43
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 113.31
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 606.01
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,171.48
AP - 00t87180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 611.16
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.79
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,421.77
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 145.94
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,693.47
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 62.02
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 139.27
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 26.87
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 133.24
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 223.03
AP - 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 164.23
AP- 00187180 8/14/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 190.56
AP- 00187181 8/14/2002 DAN GUERRAAND ASSOCIATES 760.00
AP- 00187182 8/14/2002 DEBLIEUX, MIKE 4,500.00
AP- 00187183 8/14/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20
AP- 00187183 8/14/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP- 00187183 8/14/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP- 00187184 8/14/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 146.79
AP- 00187185 8/14/2002 GCS SERVICE INC 675.95
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 38 Current Date: 08/15/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00187186 8/14/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 312.34
AP - 00187186 8/14/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 234.50
AP- 00187186 8/14/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 80.97
AP - 00187187 8/14/2002 HI WAY SAFETY 1NC 0.01
AP - 00187187 8/14/2002 HI WAY SAFETY 1NC 5,656.87
AP - 00187188 8/14/2002 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 4,893.19
AP - 00187188 8/14/2002 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES 1,200.00
AP- 00187189 8/14/2002 IBM CORPORATION 367.02
AP - 00187189 8/14/2002 IBM CORPORATION 807.98
AP - 00187190 8/I4/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 1,562.00
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 104.05
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 204.82
AP- 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 35.70
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 44.00
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 110.00
AP- 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 107.80
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 137.38
AP- 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 174.32
AP- 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 246.00
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 833.00
AP - 00187190 8/14/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 47.60
AP ~ 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 1,487.78
AP - 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 253.11
AP- 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 225.90
AP - 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 645.00
AP- 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 10,513.00
AP - 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 893.20
AP- 00187191 8/14/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 520.60
AP - 00187192 8/14/2002 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 1,009.08
AP- 00187193 8/14/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 1,967.31
AP - 00187193 8/I4/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 5,769.78
AP - 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 12.63
AP- 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 4.29
AP- 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 7.89
AP- 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 130.92
AP- 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 10.73
AP- 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 41.74
AP 00187194 8/14/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 33.32
AP 00187195 8/14/2002 LOWES 13.40
AP 00187196 8/14/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,146.25
AP 00187196 8/14/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 24,436.82
AP 00187196 8/14/2002 MARIPOSAHORTICULTURALENT1NC 117.92
AP 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 2,640.00
AP 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 3,135.00
AP 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 7,275.00
AP 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 4,575.00
AP - 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 10,335.00
AP - 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 17,145.00
AP- 00187197 8/14/2002 MDS CONSULTING 6,520.00
AP- 00187198 8/14/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 265.75
AP ~ 00187199 8/14/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 89.07
AP- 00187199 8/14/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 366.77
AP- 00187200 8/14/2002 NESCO 1,400.00
AP - 00187200 8/14/2002 NESCO 1,405.31
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 39 Current Date: 08/15/7:
Report:CKAGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount~
AP- 00187200 8/14/2002 NESCO 1,405.31
AP- 00187200 8/14/2002 NESCO 1,405.31
AP - 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 158.31
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 18.48
AP - 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 90.19
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 150.00
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 140.29
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 65.16
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 53.18
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 53.37
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 102.90
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 2,304.42
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 30.99
AP- 00187201 8/14/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 45.38
AP- 00187202 8/14/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 12,950.17
AP - 00187203 8/14/2002 PACIFIC VIDEO PRODUCTS 139.15
AP- 00187203 8/14/2002 PACIFIC VIDEO PRODUCTS 1,794.96
AP- 00187204 8/14/2002 PERVO PAINT CO 484.17
AP- 00187205 8/14/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 44.31
AP - 00187205 8/14/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 161.85
AP- 00187205 8/14/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 19,887.29
AP- 00187206 8/14/2002 PSOMAS 1,900.00
AP - 00187207 8/14/2002 R C CASA C/O ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTR 1,000.00
AP - 00187208 8/14/2002 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 700.00
AP- 00187209 8/14/2002 KED WING SHOE STOKE 73.27
AP - 00187209 8/14/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 73.27
AP - 00187209 8/14/2002 RED WING SHOE STOKE 150.00
AP- 00187209 8/14/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 133.72
AP - 00187209 8/14/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 128.22
AP- 00187209 8/14/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 149.29
AP- 00187210 8/14/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 133.72
AP- 00187211 8/14/2002 RIDGELINE ROOFING 507.50
AP-00187212 8/14/2002 RMA GROUP 1,822.75
AP- 00187213 8/14/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 424.41
AP - 00187214 8/14/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 12,500.00
AP- 00187215 8/14/2002 SAN BERNARD[NO CITY OF 135.00
AP- 00187215 8/14/2002 SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF 1,200.00
AP - 00187215 8/14/2002 SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF 1,200.00
AP - 00187216 8/14/2002 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 64.00
AP - 00187216 8/14/2002 SAN BERNARD[NO CO FIRE DEPT 695.50
AP- 00187217 8/14/2002 SAUCEDO, PAULA 200.00
AP- 00187218 8/14/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TEST1NG LLC 1,965.52
AP- 00187219 8/14/2002 SKYLINE ORANGE COUNTY 2,378.04
AP - 00187220 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 47,510.86
AP - 00187221 8/14/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 1,216.66
AP - 00187222 8/14/2002 SOFT CHOICE CORP 4,746.24
AP- 00187223 8/14/2002 SPORT CHALET 677.27
AP - 00187224 8/14/2002 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 363.20
AP - 00187225 8/14/2002 SUNGARD BI TECH [NC 134.19
AP - 00187225 8/14/2002 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 5,250.00
AP- 00187226 8/14/2002 SURE SHKED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 75.00
AP- 00187227 8/14/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 390.00
AP- 00187227 8/14/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 325.00
AP - 00187227 8/14/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 585.00
User: cgonzale - Carole Gonzales Page: 40 Current Date: 08/15/S.
Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
-~ Agenda Check Register
7/25/2002 through 8/15/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00187227 8/14/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,787.50
AP- 00187228 8/14/2002 TERM1NIX INTERNATIONAL 324.00
AP- 00187228 8/14/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 67.00
AP- 00187228 8/14/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 67.00
AP- 00187228 8/14/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 1,020.00
AP- 00187228 8/14/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 56.00
AP- 00187229 8/14/2002 TRANSAMERICAN SOIL 1,154.16
AP- 00187229 8/14/2002 TRANSAMERICAN SOIL 430.07
AP- 00187230 8/14/2002 UNIQUE CREATIONS 25.36
AP- 00187231 8/14/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,650.00
AP- 00187232 8/14/2002 WEST GROUP 129.30
AP- 00187232 8/14/2002 WEST GROUP 621.89
AP- 00187232 8/14/2002 WEST GROUP 119.61
AP-00187233 8/14/2002 WlLLDANASSOCIATES 48,895.00
AP - 00187233 8/14/2002 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 1,575.00
AP - 00187233 8/14/2002 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 210.00
AP - 00187233 8/14/2002 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 1,005.00
Total for Check ID AP: 5,183,642.19
Total for Entity: 5,183,642.19
User: cgonzate - Carole Gonzales Page: 41 Current Date: 08/15/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: ,/08:3q
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
July 31, 2002
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv,
Local Agency Investment Funds 38,128,023.89 38,128,023.89 38,128,023.89 24.98 1 1 2.677 2.714
Certificates of Depesit/Neg, - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,514,846.68 1,515,000.00 0.99 91 26 1.710 1.734
Commerciar Paper - Discount 5,000,000,00 4,952,170.50 4,947,895.83 3.24 183 75 2.106 2.135
Federal Agency issues - Coupon 94,100,000.00 95,837,108 38 94,065,168.75 61.63 1,584 1,143 5.166 5.238
Federal Agency Issues - Dis~ount 11,0(X),000.00 10,988,599.86 10,979,852.50 7.19 38 22 1.700 1.724
Treasury Securities - Discount 3,000,000.00 2.992,500.00 2,991,337.50 1.96 63 56 1.655 1.678
Investments 152,743,023.89 154,413,249.31 152,627,278.47 100.00% 988 710 4.093 4.150
Cash
Passbook/Checking 329,937.02 329,937.02 329,937.02 I I 0.493 0.500
(not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
153,072,960.91 154,743,186.33 152,957,215.49 988 710 4.093 4.150
Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 548,052.38 548,052.38
Average Daily Balance 152,063,473.90 152,063,473.90
Effective Rate of Return 4.24% 4.24%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21,2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Sen/ices Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month*end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-lnteractive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
govern the management of these funds.
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 08/12/2002 - 13:45 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page2
Portfolio Details - Investments
July 31, 2002
Average Purchase Stated YTM Daysto Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYS00(X)5 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 38,128,023.89 38,128,023.89 38,128,023.89 2.714 2.677 1
Subtotal and Average 38,793,137.47 38,128,023.89 38,128,023.89 38,128,023,89 2.677 1
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
0605OEJ48 1129 BANK OF AMERICA 05~5/2002 1,515,0~0,00 1,514,846,68 1,515,000.00 1,710 1,710 26 0~/27/2002
Subtotal and Average 1~15,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,514,846.68 1,515,000.00 1.710 26
Commercial Paper - Discount
8923E3KF9 1121 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. 04/15/2002 5,000,000.00 4,952,170.50 4,947,595.83 2.050 2.106 75 15/15/2002
Subtotal and Average 4,947,895.83 5,000,000.00 4,~52,170.50 4,947,895,83 2.106 75
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331RMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 2,037,789.92 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 158 01/06f2003
31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,037,500.00 2,000,(X)0.00 5.730 5.652 907 01/24/2005
31331LSG4 1112 FEDERAL F^RM CREDIT BANK 10/29/2001 5,000,000.CO 5,023,437.50 5,000,C~0.CO 4.125 4.O68 1,C~2 04/29/2005
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 3
Portfolio Details- Investments
July 31, 2002
A~erage Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
312925GT1 1122 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/18/2002 3,000,000.00 3,053,117.98 3,0C~,000.00 5.020 4.951 1,174 10/18/2005
312925JC5 1126 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP 05/06/2002 4,0C~,000.00 4,033,559.57 4,000,CO0.~O 5.200 5.129 1,558 11/06/2(X)6
31864FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,068,235.78 2,000,CO0.CO 6.125 6.041 2~1 05/19/2003
31364KR36 1077 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/05/2001 4,000,000.00 4,001,250.00 3,999,375.00 5.625 5.553 735 08/05/2004
3136FOAL6 1085 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04~04~2001 4,000,000.00 4,187,500.00 3,994,375.00 5.3CO 5.259 1,336 03/29/2006
3136FOEW8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24~CO1 3,000,000.00 3,075,000.00 2,997,000.00 5.510 5.457 1,355 04/17/'2006
3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,C~0.00 2,116,250.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,392 05/24/2006
3136F1FF2 1118 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 01/23/2002 2,0(X),C~O.CO 2,026,875.00 2,000,000.00 5.CO0 4.932 1,271 01/23/2006
3136FIXU9 1123 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2002 4,000,000.00 4,082,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,180 10/24/2005
3136F1YT1 1125 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/25/2002 2,0G0,000.00 2,044,375.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,363 04/25/2006
Subtotel and Average 98,191,771.57 94,100,000.00 95,837,108.38 94,065,168.75 5.166 1,143
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
313385A30 1137 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/23/2002 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,997,912.50 1.670 1.671 0 08/01/2002
Treasu~j Securities - Discount
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 08/12/2(X~ - 13:45 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 4
Portfolio Details - Cash
July 31, 2002
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Data Par Value Mad(et Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts
SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 329,937.02 329,937.02 329,937.02 0.500 0.4.q3 1
Average Balance 0.~¢3 1
Total Cash and Investmentus 152,063,473.90 153,072,960.91 154,743,186.33 152,957,215.49 4.093 710
Portfolio CITY
CP
Ru~l Date: 08/12/2002 - 13:45 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page5
Activity By Type
July 1, 2002 through July 31,2002
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Data or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
sYsooo05 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 2.714 6,948,677.08 6,100,000.00
Subtotal 37,279,346.81 6,948,677.08 6,100,0~0.00 38,128,023.89
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 21,071.05 0.00
Subtotal 308,865.97 21,071.05 0.00 329,937.02
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,~00.00
Commercial Paper - Discount
Subtotal 4,947,895.83 4,947,895.83
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331RDX0 00~6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 6.240 07/17/2002 0.00 1,999,375.00
31331LMP0 1109 FE~)ERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5~750 07/22/2002 0.00 1,997,812.50
31331LTG1 1115 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.750 07/03/2002 0.00 4,000.000.00
3133MGBV7 1110 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5~8G0 07/24/2002 0.00 1,999,375.00
3133MKU88 1117 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.000 07/15/2002 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133MPPH3 1136 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.5CO 07/10/2002 4,000,000.00 0.00
3136FORV6 1108 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 5.750 07/05/2002 0.00 1,998,750.00
Subtotal 104,060,481.25 4,000,000.0~ 13,995,312.50 94,~65,168.75
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
313385ZK5 1133 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.760 07/15/2002 1,999,902.22 0.00
313385ZK5 1133 07/16/2002 0,00 1,999,902.22
313385A30 1137 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.670 07/23/2002 4,997,912.50 0.00
313397ZS3 1134 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 1,650 07/22/2002 3,999,816.,67 0.O0
313397ZS3 1134 07/23/2002 0.00 3,999,816.67
313589ZD8 1132 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 1.700 07/10/2002 0.00 5,996,316.67
313589F40 1135 FEDERAL NATL M~G ASSN 1.720 07/10/2002 5,981.940.00 0.00
Subtotal 5,996,316.67 16,979,571.39 11,9~6,~35.56 10,~79,852.50
Treasury Securities - DIssount
912795LC3 1138 TREASURY BILL 1.650 07/25/2002 2,991,337.BO 0.00
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 08/12/2002 - 13:45 PM (PRF_PM3) S~mRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 6
Activity By Type
July 1, 2002 through July 31, 2002
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
Total 154,107,906.53 30,940,657.02 32,091,348.66 152,957~15.49
Portfolio CITY
CP
Date: 08/12/2C{~ - 13;45 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRe~t V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended June 30, 2002
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Paving A~ent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund Fimt Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.36% $ 257,311.78
Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.36% 243,980.73
Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 1.36% 1,622.72
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 502,915.23
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Tmesury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund Fimt Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.36% 586,755.78
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Sr. Resrv. Fund First Arnerican Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.36% 1,102,292.13
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemption Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0,00%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 1.36% 67,172.53
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Residual Fund First Amedcan Tmas L~ry Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.36% 218,053.15
Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 1,974,273.59
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2~477,188.82
* Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated matudty date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
.j~ i:VinancetCash with Fiscal Agents.xls ~'/11/2002 1:07 PM
TH E CITY OF
l%Al~ ¢ ~ 0 ~U~A}~ONGA
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Membem of the City Coundl
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
DATE: August 21, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE 2002 LOCAL AGENCY BIENNIAL NOTICE
PERTAINING TO THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the "2002 Local Agency
Biennial Notice" indicating no amendments are necessary to the City's Conflict of Interest Code.
BACKGROUND
The Fair Political Practices Commission requires every local government agency to review its
Conflict of Interest Code biennially to determine if it is accurate or must be amended. Once the
determination has been made, a notice must be submitted to the code reviewing body (the City
Council) no later than October 1 of even-numbered years.
After reviewing the City's Conflict of Interest Code, it was determined that no amendments are
necessary at this time and that the "2002 Local Agency Biennial Notice" can be completed to
indicate this.
Respectfully submitted,
City Clerk
2002 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Name of Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Contact Person: Debra J. Adams Office.PhoneNo:. (909) 477-2700
Fax Number:. (909)' 477-2846 E-mail (optional): dadams@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined that:
I--] The code needs to be amended and the following amendments are necessary:
(Check all tl~at apply)
O Include new positions (including consultants) that must be designated
O Revise the titles of existing positions
0 Delete the titles of positions that have been abolished
O Delete the positions that manage public investments
Q Revise disclosure categories
0 Other
No atnendments are necessary. The agency's code accurately designates all positions that make or participate
in the making o~: governmental decisions; the disclosure categories assigned to those positions accurately
require the disclosure of all investments, business positions, interests in real property and sources of income
which may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those designated positions; and the
code includes all other provisions required by Goverr~ment Code Section 87302.
8/22/02
Signa~re of Chief ~ecu#¥e Officer Oate
William J. Alexander, Mayor
T H E C I T Y O F
~^N CI~ 0 C 0 CA M 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE
ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
INTERESTS FOR THE EXTENSION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND
THE WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD AT APN 0227-161-21 AS PART
OF THE PROPOSED PHASE I-A IMPROVEMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
INTRODUCTION:
The Resolution of Necessity on the City Council agenda seeks to acquire a permanent
street easement on the real property adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line
Road (the "Subject Property Interests"). The Subject Property Interests are sought for
public purposes. Specifically, the Subject Property Interests are being acquired to
facilitate the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and the widening of Base Line Road
and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, and is commonly referred to as Phase l-
A of Community Facilities District 2001-01 Project ("the proposed Project"). The City
Council will acquire the Subject Property Interests pursuant to California Constitution
Article I, Section 19, California Government Code sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351,
37353, 40404 and 54031 and California Code of Civil Procedure section 1230.010 et
seq. ("Eminent Domain Law"), including, but not limited to, sections 1240.010 through
1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law.
CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Resolution of Necessity-Eminent Domain-Pierotti
August 21,2002
Page 2
As explained more fully below, the proposed Project would require the acquisitions of
the Subject Property Interests for a Permanent Street Easement in connection with the
proposed Project.
That the City Council:
Consider the Resolution of Necessity on its agenda, which is Resolution of Necessity of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for
Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof, In Connection With The
Extension of Day Creek Boulevard and the Widening of Base Line Road as Part of the
Proposed Phase 1 -A Improvements of the Community Facilities District 2001-01.
If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in this
Report and the testimony and comments received at this hearing, that the evidence
warrants the necessary findings with respect to the proposed Resolutions of Necessity,
then staff recommends that the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt the
Resolution (which requires a 4/5ths vote) and authorize that an eminent domain
proceeding be filed to acquire the following real property interests:
Permanent Street Easement on property located at 12215 Base Line Road, Rancho
Cucamonga, Califomia, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 0227-161-21.
This real property interest is described more particularly in the Exhibit attached to the
Resolution.
If the Resolution of Necessity is approved, authorize the City Attorney's office and staff
to take all necessary steps to file and prosecute eminent domain proceedings to acquire
the subject property interests.
Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed Project is consistent with and is a proposed component of the City's
General Plan. The Circulation Element of the General Plan specifically provides that
Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road be constructed as major divided arterial
streets.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Resolution of Necessity-Eminent Domain-Pierotti
August 21, 2002
Page 3
The proposed Project would consist of widening Base Line Road to the south to
accommodate the lanes of traffic, installing curb and gutter and street lights and the
construction of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Base Line Road to Chumh Street.
The construction of the proposed Project in the manner proposed would require the
acquisition of the Subject Property Interests for street widening purposes.
The City anticipates that the construction of the proposed Project would commence no
later than August 12, 2002. The City expects that the construction will take
approximately nine (9) months.
The potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were studied and analyzed
in connection with the EIR for the Victoria Arbors project, SCH 98041137 for the
proposed Project, certified by the City Council on July 7, 1999 by Resolution No. 99-148
with the Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted December 20, 2000 by
Resolution No. 00-286. The certification of the EIR and Facts and Findings were based
on the contents of the EIR, the comments received on the EIR, and the report of the
proceedings in connection with the proposed Project, and the duly noticed public
hearings.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, in certifying the EIR for the proposed
Project, the City Council, as the lead agency, found that with the mitigation measures
and all significant impacts identified in the EIR have been mitigated, avoided, or
reduced to an acceptable level, except for one identified unavoidable impact described
in the Statement of Facts of Findings. The unavoidable significant impact of the project
as identified in the Statement of Facts of Findings is outweighed by the economic,
social, and other benefits of the project identified in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
Further, in accordance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code and CEQA
Guidelines section 15075, the City prepared a Notice of Determination, which was
posted by the County Clerk in July of 1999.
The EIR together with its Exhibits, Resolution No. 00-268 and the Notice of
Determination are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and are incorporated in this report by this reference.
City Staff, in connection with the proposed Resolutions of Necessity, has reviewed all of
the environmental documentation prepared on the proposed Project, including
Certification of Environmental Impact Report, SCH 98041137, and the Notice of
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Resolution of Necessity-Eminent Domain-Pierotti
August 21, 2002
Page 4
Determination and pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources
Codes. City Staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the
proposed Project or the circumstances surrounding the project, nor has the City
obtained any new information of substantial importance that could have been known
with reasonable diligence at the time that the negative declaration was adopted that
would require further environmental review. Therefore, no further environmental
documentation is necessary and there continues to be no substantial evidence that the
proposed Project or the proposed acquisitions of the Subject Property Interests will
have any significant environmental impact.
As more fully described below, pursuant to Government Code section 7262, et seq., the
City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a fair market value appraisal of the Subject
Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance with the fair market value, and
extended a written offer to the owners of record. Following is a brief summary of the
City's actions with respect to the Subject Property Interests pursuant to Government
Code section 7262, et seq.
Permanent Street Easement on property located at 12215 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number
0227-161-21
Pursuant to Government Code section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a
fair market value appraisal of the subject real property based on a May 28, 2002
date of value. The City set just compensation in accordance with the appraised
fair market value, and in June 2002 extended a written offer letter to the owners
of record, Ossi and Anna Pierotti, and engaged in negotiations with the record
owners, but there has been no agreement on the sale of the subject real
property.
A true and correct copy of the offer letter is on file in the Office of the City Engineer and
is incorporated in this Agenda Statement by this reference. To date, no negotiated
purchase for the Subject Property Interests has been consummated, and the schedule
of the proposed Project requires that the City Council consider the proposed Resolution
of Necessity at this time.
A. The Public Interest And Necessity Require The Proposed Project
As explained above, the City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for a public
purpose. Specifically, the Subject Property Interests are needed to extend Day Creek
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Resolution of Necessity-Eminent Domain-Pierotti
August21,2002
Page §
Boulevard, and widen Base Line Road, which is a public use. The public interest and
necessity require the proposed Project because the extension of Day Creek Boulevard
and widening of Base Line Road will alleviate traffic congestion and provide for safety
consistent with the public health and safety element of the General Plan. Therefore, as
a whole, the proposed Project will preserve, protect and enhance the public interest.
In short, the public interest and necessity require the proposed Project to better meet
the City's traffic and circulation needs within the City and fulfill the City's General Plan
objectives.
B. The Proposed Project is Planned and Located in The Manner That Will be
Compatible With The Greatest Public Good And Least Private Injury
As shown above, the proposed Project would be constructed on the northerly portion of
the parcel; a width varying from 11' on the west to roughly 40' on the east and along the
east portion of the parcel a width of roughly 50'.
The dedication sought through this eminent domain action will allow for construction of
the full street width as defined in the General Plan. Private development of the subject
parcel would have required the same dedication and public improvements as conditions
of approval.
The City seeks to acquire the Subject Property Interests for the extension of Day Creek
Boulevard and widening of Base Line Road. This permanent easement would permit
the City to construct the full street section of Day Creek Boulevard; including three travel
lanes, landscape median, install street lights, curb and gutter and match existing grade,
as well as under Base Line Road to three through travel lanes with a landscaped
median, install street light and curb and gutter. The construction of the proposed
Project would cause minimal impact to the properties on which these easements are
sought. As described in staff reports presented to the City Council in connection with
approval of the Proposed Project, the City will be vigilant throughout the construction
process in requiring the contractor to comply with the environmental requirements as
defined in the project specifications, which will ensure the least amount of impact to the
surrounding area. Those staff reports are incorporated herein by reference.
C. The Subject Property Interests Described in The Resolutions of Necessity
Are Necessary For The Proposed Project
As explained above, the construction of the proposed Project in the manner
proposed would require the acquisition of the Subject Property Interests for street
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: Resolution of Necessity-Eminent Domain-Pierotti
August21,2002
Page 6
widening purposes. This construction would include three lanes of pavement, one-half
of a landscaped median, and curb and gutter.
D. The Offer Required by Section 7267.2 of The Government Code Has
Been Made to The Owners of Record of The Real Property Interests Sought to be
Acquired
Pursuant to Government Code section 7262, et seq., the City obtained a fair market
value appraisal of the Subject Property Interests, set just compensation in accordance
with the appraised fair market value, and extended a written offer letter to the each of
the record owners of the Subject Property Interests identified above.
A true and correct copy of the offer letters are on file in the Office of the City Engineer
and are incorporated in this Agenda Statement by this reference. To date, however, no
negotiated purchase has been consummated and the schedule for the proposed Project
requires that the City Council consider the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this
time.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
~City Engineer
WJO:MEP
VICINITY MAP
COMMUNITY FACILI'i'IFS DISTRICT NO.2001-01
EXHIBIT ~:
RESOLUTION NO. ~,2-2,.~ /
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC
PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION
THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXTENSION OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE WIDENING OF BASE
LINE ROAD AS PART OF THE PROPOSED PHASE I-A
IMPROVEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT 2001-01
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal corporation in the
County of San Bemardino, State of California.
Section 2. The real property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution
are to be taken for a public use, namely for a permanent street easement in connection
with street widening purposes ("proposed Project"), and all uses necessary or
convenient thereto pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1,
Section 19, California Government Code sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 37353,
40404 and 54031 and California Code of Civil Procedure section 1230.010, et seq.,
including, but not limited to sections 1240.010 through 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120,
1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650, and other provisions of law.
Section 3. The real property interests sought to be taken are a permanent
street easement on portions of property located at 12215 Base Line Road, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0227-161-21
("Subject Property Interests"). The legal description of the Subject Property Interests is
attached as Exhibit "1" to this Resolution and the Subject Property Interests are
depicted on the diagram attached as Exhibit "2" to this Resolution. Said Exhibits are
incorporated herein by this reference. Said Subject Property Interests are located
adjacent to real property owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Subject
Property Interests are required to facilitate the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and
the widening of Base Line Road as part of the proposed Phase I-A Improvements of
the Community Facilities District 2001-01, which is a public use.
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and
determines that:
RESOLUTION NO.
August21,2002
Page 2
A. The acquisition of the Subject Property Interests are required to carry out
and make effective the principal purpose of the proposed Project. A general description
of the proposed Project is set forth in the Agenda Statement dated August 21,2002 and
the evidence, reports, and documents cited in that Agenda Statement are all
incorporated herein by this reference.
B. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were
studied and analyzed in connection with the EIR for the Victoria Arbors Village, SCH:
98041137 which included the proposed street improvements, construction and widening
Project as a condition of approval. The certification of the EIR and the adoption of the
Statement of Facts of Findings and Overriding Considerations was based on the
contents of the EIR, the comments received on the EIR, the report of the proceedings in
connection with the proposed Project, and the duly noticed public hearings.
City Staff, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity, has
reviewed all of the environmental documentation prepared on the proposed Project,
including the Environmental Impact Report for the Victoria Arbors Village, SCH
98041187, and the Notice of Determination and pursuant to the criteria of Section
15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and Section 21166 of the
Public Resources Codes, City Staff concluded that there have been no substantial
changes in the proposed Project, nor the circumstances surrounding the proposed
Project, nor has the City obtained any new information of substantial importance that
would require further environmental review.
D. The environmental findings in connection with the proposed Project are
the same environmental findings for the proposed acquisition of the Subject Property
Interests. The City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed
Project, including the proposed acquisition will have a substantial environmental impact.
The documents and other material which constitute the record on which this decision is
based are located in the Department of Planning and Community Development and are
in the custody of the Director of Planning and Community Development.
Section 5. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds
and determines that:
A. The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project;
B. The proposed Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
C. The property interests hereinabove described are necessary to carry out
and make effective the principal purpose of the proposed Project; and
RESOLUTION NO.
August 21,2002
Page 3
D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been
made to the owners of record.
Section 6. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are
based on the record before the City Council on August 21, 2002 when it adopted this
Resolution, including the Agenda Statement dated August 21, 2002, all documents
referenced and incorporated in the Agenda Statement, the testimony at the hearing, and
the records and documents prepared in connection with the proposed Project, all of
which are incorporated in this Resolution by this reference.
Section 7. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga authorizes and
directs the City Attorney's office and City Staff to take all steps necessary to commence
and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by
eminent domain the real property interests described in Exhibit "1" attached hereto.
Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall cause this Resolution and her certification to be entered in the Book of Resolutions
of the Council of this City.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga this 21st day of August, 2002.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
ATTEST:
.(SEAL)
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James L. Markman William J. O'Neil
City Attorney City Engineer
March 1, 2002 (Pierotti)
EXHIBIT 1
Legal Description of an Easement for Street,
Highway & Related Purposes for Base Line Road &
Day Creek Boulevard
Real Property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino,
State of California, legally described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest comer of Section 5, T. 1S., R. 6W., as shown on the
Record of Survey, recorded in Book 47 of Records of Survey, Pages 68 through 75,
records of said County;
Thence N 89o49'26" E a distance of 360.01 feet along the North line of said Section, also
known as the centerline of Base Line Road, to the Northwest comer of Parcel 1 of Parcel
Map No. 1 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 1, of Parcel
Maps, Page 1, records of the County of San Bemardino, State of California;
Thence southerly along the West line of said Parcel 1 a distance of 49.00 feet to the Tree
Point of Beginning;
Thence N 81 o 49'14" E a distance of 71.83 feet to a point on a line that is parallel with
and 39.00 feet southerly of the North line of said Parcel 1;
Thence along said parallel line N 89°49'23" E a distance of 282.26 feet to a point on a
tangent curve, concave northerly, having a radius of 7539.00 feet;
Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 00o50, 10', a distance of
110.02 feet;
Thence along a non-tangent line N 89004'48'' E a distance of 200.83 feet, to a point on a
non-tangent curve having a radius of 7542.00 feet, a radial to said ~urve point bears
S 02o32'20" E;
Thence easterly along said non-tangent curve through a central angle of 01 °27'3 I" a
distance of 192.00 feet;
Thence N 86000'09'' E a distance of 35.92 feet to a point, being on the East line of said
Parcel 1, said point being located southerly from the northeast comer of said Parcel 1, a
distance of 22.85 feet;
Page 1 of 3 ~/
EXHIBIT 1 (continued)
Thence along the East line of said Parcel 1, S 00°15'42'' W a distance of 1538.07 feet to a
point on the South line of said Parcel 1;
Thence S 89° 38'01" W, along said South line a distance of 50.35 feet to a point;
Thence N 01°28'41'' W a distance of 181.39 feet to a point on a tangent curve, concave
easterly, and having a radius of 2563.00 feet;
Thence along said curve through a central angle of 01°37'56' a distance of 73.01 feet to a
point of tangeney;
Thence N 00°09' 15" E, a distance of 462.86 feet to a point;
Thence N 29056'48" W, a distance of 15.71 feet to a point;
Thence N 00°03'12" E, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point;
Thence N 30°03'12" E, a distance of 15.91 feet to a point;
Thence N 00°09, 15" E, a distance of 244.91 feet to a point;
Thence N 01 °08'52" W, a distance of 176.05 feet to a point;
Thence N 00°09'15'' E, a distance of 56.07 feet to a point on a tangent curve, concave
westerly, having a radius of 257.33 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 12o40'49" a distance of
56.95 feet to a point on a reverse curve, concave easterly having a radius Of 152.67 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 12040'49'' a distance of
33.79 feet to a point oftangeney;
Thence N 00°09'15" E, a distance of 37.62 feet to a point;
Thence N 43°23'20'' W, a distance of 155.86 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve,
concave northerly, having a radius of 7579.00 feet, a radial to said curve bears,
N 02°48'08'' W;
Thence westerly along said curve through a central angle of 01°30'20'' a distance of
199.15 feet to a point on a compOund curve having a radius of 163.00 feet a radial to said
curve bears N 01°17'48'' W; ·
Thence westerly along said curve through a central angle of 15°47'55", a distance of
44.95 feet to a point of tangency;
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT 1 (continued)
Thence N 75°29'53" W a distance of 7.94 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave
southerly, having a radius of 137.00 feet;
Thence westerly along said curve through a central angle of 13o52'26" a distance of
33.17 feet to a point oftangency;
Thence N 89°22'19" W, a distance of 208.94 feet to a point;
Thence S 89°49'26" W, a distance of 217.88 feet to a point;
Thence N 00°15'52'' E a distance of 11.00 feet to a point, said point being the Tree Point
of Beginning.
Containing 2.79 ac/es.
See Exhibit B-1 attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Prepared by:
SR Consultants, Inc.
25322 Rye Canyon Road, Suite 201
Santa Cladta, CA 91355
(66.1) 257-6570
t' 3-- ,. c.
J
'¢~lliam McKenzie -- Date
RCE No. 33922
Expires: 6/2002
Page 3 of 3 ~'~
'.~
EXIS~NO AREA - 31.98 ACRES
~ PROPOSED AREA - 29.19 ACRES
- DEDICA~ON AREA - 2.79 ACRES
PROPOSED T-
A-2 ~-0F-WAY '
.AP I~hB~NDARY
LINE DATA: CURVE DATA: E~IT 2
~s,~r ENGINEERING. ~ND P~NNING. ~ND SURVEYING
3o.~'15.71. ~~~*~ :. 25322 RyE CANYON ROAD, SUITE 201
7tU' U5 N 8~04'a' ~ =.U' Phone = (661) 257-6570
8f~'u- ~ ~8==8' H 8~'~' = ~.o2' N.T.S. PA~ 1 OF 1 Fox = (661} 257-6577
17 A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P. City Manager
FROM: Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: "CLEEP" GRANT EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
Thermal Imaging Camera & Accessories $ 24,588.55
,, The Bullard Thermal lmager is a tool that will greatly enhance officers and most
importantly citizen safety in a number of applications in our city. It allows
personnel to locate victims/suspects when visibility is low or non-existent. This is
accomplished with the use of "Thermal Imaging" technology you may have seen
on law enforcement footage on television usually mounted on a helicopter. This
allows us to see an image of a subject or material generated in reference to the
heat given off by their body. This allows a subject to be located quickly and many
times without them even realizing they have been located. This camera is
handheld and very versatile. It will cut the time officers take to locate
victims/suspects in critical incidents.
o Vendor:
· L.N. Curtis & Sons, 1800 Peralta Street, Oakland, Ca 94607.
o Single Source Justification:
· LN. Curtis is the only authorized distributor for the Bullard's
Thermal lmager for the State of California. This is the same
vendor that we had purchased two (2) imagers from under the
LLEBG. For consistency in the equipment and technical support,
we would like to maintain the same vendor.
CLEEP GRANT EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
August 2002
Page Two
Forensic Video Analysis System $ 26,403.06
· The Avid Technology and Ocean System have put together a standalone turnkey
system known as the Avid Xpress. The Avid Xpress is designed exclusively for
the collection and analysis of video evidence. Videotape from security cameras
record the actions of citizens on average 15 to 20 times every day. The Avid
Xpress is a system that can take that raw video evidence and capture it into a
format that can be analyzed to gain as much evidence as is physically possible.
The Avid Xpress was designed by leaders in the film and video industry. It comes
complete with several useful tools that would enable the investigator to enhance those
often times grainy videotapes from local markets or banks. These tools will assist our
officers in identifying suspects in such violent crimes as robberies and homicides
where video cameras are deployed.
The Avid Xpress can be used to enhance any video evidence. This could be used
when trying to identify a license plate on a vehicle in a drive through line or helping to
identify the last actions of missing person from an ATM.
o Vendor:
· Ocean Systems, 4016 Blackburn Lane, Burtonsville, MD 20866.
o Sole Source Justification:
· Avid Technology is the design source behind the Avid Xpress.
Avid designs the software and firmware that makes it unique to
any other equipment that is on the market. Ocean Systems is in
partnership with Avid and actually manufactures the final product
to the end user. Ocean Systems takes the technology designed by
Avid and integrates it with existing electronic components to
create the finished product. At present, the only way to purchase
the Avid Xpress is through Ocean Systems.
-2-
CLEEP GRANT EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
August 2002
Page Three
Forensic Recovery of Evidence Computer $ 9,205.94
· F.R.E.D. is an acronym for Forensic Recovery of Evidence Device. FRED is a
standalone turnkey system designed to collect and analyze electronic media in a
sterile evidentiary sound environment. It will enable officers to analyze the contents
of virtually every electronic storage device currently available on the market. FRED
is able to talk to any Hard Drive, CD ROM, Floppy Disk or similar device and
capture the data stored therein without altering any of the data on the original device.
This machine will enable officers to seamh for and collect electronic evidence
from computers and other devices for the purposes of prosecuting such cases as
child pornography, electronic commerce fraud, email threats and other crimes
involving electronic fraud. In the past, computers and other devices seized in
connection with these types of crimes would have to be sent to other departments
for analysis. This would often times take six months or longer before any results
would be seen. FRED will enable our officers to do the analysis in house thereby
enhancing the productivity and efficiency of the station.
o Vendor:
· Digital Intelligence, Inc., 1327 Pearl Street, Waukesha, WI 53186.
o Sole Source Justification:
· FRED is designed from the ground up exclusively by Digital
Intelligence. When dealing with computer evidence, extraordinary
and specific care must be utilized in order to maintain the integrity
of the electronic media stored within. A forensic computer must
be able to capture the evidence without making any alterations to
the original source. The average computer, pumhased offthe
shelf, is incapable of doing this because every time an average
computer is turned on, it alters the data stored on the hard drive.
FRED is designed in such a way that it can connect to another
computer's hard drive without altering any of the data. In short, it
establishes a one-way communication link that enables FRED to copy
the information stored on the suspect hard drive without making any
changes.
FRED is the only machine that provides connectivity to virtually every
available electronic device as well as a selection of tools and
accessories that will dramatically enhance the performance of division.
-3-
CLEEP GRANT EQUIPMENT PURCHASES
August 2002
Page Four
Video Projectors $10,537.96
· To provide for computer video presentations for various trainings, neighborhood
watch groups, advisory groups, DARE graduations, and other law enforcement
events.
o Vendor:
· MCSi, 9567 Arrow Route, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca
91730.
o Repeat Purchase:
· This is the same vendor we had purchased the same make and
model video projectors from. For consistency in the equipment
and technical support, we would like to maintain the same vendor.
-4-
T H E C I 'r Y o F
I~ANCHO CUCAH ON GA
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPIATE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,158.47 FROM THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OFFICE GRANT
BUDGET IN THE 2002/2003 RSCAL YEAR (ACCOUNT NUMBER 12604015200)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the appropriation of funds from the Office of the
San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools for $8,158.47 for the 2002/2003 fiscal budget
(account number 12604015200).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The original contract between the San Bernardino County of Superintendent of Schools and the
City was for the time frame of July 1998 - June 2001. This $30,000 grant award was for an After
School Drop-in Program. Due to circumstances beyond the City's control, the After School
Program was not able to be implemented on our middle/junior high campuses. With Council's
approval, staff negotiated a new program, Teen Connection with the Chaffey Joint Union High
School District to implement a lunchtime program on our local high school campuses. The goal of
the Teen Connection Program is to give students during their lunchtime an opportunity to interact
with City staff and learn more about our programs/services and volunteer opportunities.
The San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools is allowing staff to continue to expend their
grant funds for this worthwhile program into FY 2002/2003. Therefore, staff is requesting that the
City Council appropriate $8,158.47 into the City's FY 2002/2003 budget to be used for the Teen
Connection Program. Additional funding for this program for FY 2002/2003, in the amount of
$30,000, is being provided by the State Department of Parks and Recreation.
Community Services Director
~:~MM$ERV~UN~L&B~ARDs~TY~UN~Lt$TAFFF~EP~RT$~2~£~TcGRANTAPPR~PR~AT~N8-21-~2.D~
TH E C I T Y OF
I~A N C H 0 C U CA ~1 0 N C,A
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager
DATE: August 21,2002
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE AWARD OF GYMNASTICS AND
DANCE CLASS SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT~
PER THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED FROM RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BUSINESSES, AS FOLLOWS: DYNASTY GYMNASTICS - ALL CLASSES AS
PROPOSED FOR AGE CATEGORY 24 MO - ADULT; PRECISION GYMNASTICS -
CLASSES AS PROPOSED FOR AGE CATEGORY 0 MO - 23 MO AND SPECIAL
NEEDS; INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY - ALL CLASSES AS PROPOSED;
AND DANCE TERRIFIC - ALL CLASSES AS PROPOSED ONLY EXCLUDING
BEGINNING HIP/HOP FOR AGE CATEGORY 9 - 15 YEARS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the award of gymnastics and dance class
services for the Community Services Department for 2002-03, with an option to renew for an
additional two years, per the proposals received from Rancho Cucamonga businesses, as
follows: Dynasty Gymnastics - all classes as proposed for age category 24 months - adult;
Precision Gymnastics - classes as proposed for age category 0 months - 23 months and
special needs; Inland Valley Dance Academy - all classes as proposed; and Dance Terrific -
all classes as proposed, only excluding Beginning Hip/Hop for age category 9 - 15 years.
BACK(~ROUND/ANALYSlS
The Community Services Department provided specifications to Purchasing for gymnastics
and dance class services. Purchasing prepared a Request for Proposal and mailed it to five
(5) Rancho Cucamonga vendors. Five (5) proposals were received. After analysis of the
proposals by Community Services, Risk Management, and Purchasing staff, it has been
determined that the award should be split between the four (4) most responsive and
responsible vendors that most closely meet the specifications as required by the Community
Services Department
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
R A N (:: h O C U C A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AIOP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR CO-SPONSORSHIP OF THE RANCHO
CUOAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE'S GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL
SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 4-6, 2002, AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
EPICENTER.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the attached request from the Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber of Commeme for co-sponsorship of their Grape Harvest Festival that is
scheduled for October 4-6, 2002, (move-in/out dates extend the Chamber's request to include
October 2, 3 and 7th) at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Special Event Area and waive the base
rent, the move in/out rental fee, basic maintenance expenses and any City related permits required
for the event.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce has hosted a wine and grape festival for the
community for a number of years. Over the past several years the event has changed venues and
time frames. Two years ago the Chamber scaled back the event to make the festival more
manageable to staff with their volunteer core, moved the dates of the festival back to the traditional
dates of early October and moved the event to bring it back to Rancho Cucamonga.
The current plans for the Festival include a 3-day move in/out period and 3 event days. Activities
planned for the Festival include business vendor booths, arts and crafts, community stage featuring
local entertainment, food and beverage vendors and a wine/beer pavilion at the Epicenter Special
Event Area. Parking Lots A, B, C and D at the Epicenter will be used for overflow parking. This
year's request has been expanded to include the two additional parking lots; C and D.
Based upon requirements of the event, conditions of use for the site and cost estimates associated
with the use of the Epicenter have been developed by staff. Traditional rental fees for such an
event would include a base rent for the Epicenter Special Event Area and parking lots A, B, C and
7/
C1~¢ COUNCIL
Co-SPONSORSHIP OF GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL
AUGUST 21, 2002
D, move in/out rent for the Epicenter Special Event Area, maintenance services and police security.
These fees are detailed below:
· Base Rent - Event Dates
(Special Event Area, Parking lots A, B, C & D) $9,000.00
· Move in/out Rental (Special Event Area) $2,250.00
· Maintenance (includes additional support for refuse pick-up service as
requested by the Chamber) $2,848.80
· Police Security (event days/timeframes only) $5.191.56
Total $19,290.36
In addition to the above mentioned fees the following charges would also be required from the
applicant: 10% admissions fee based upon gross revenue from the ticket sales and parking lots,
10% of gross revenue on Chamber sold food, beverage and merchandise sales. Traditionally these
fees are due within 5-working days of the event.
Staff has recently received a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commeme for co-
sponsorship and waiver of all fees, except for the admissions tax, for the upcoming Festival.
To be consistent with other co-sponsorship requests that the City Council has approved in the past,
it is staff's recommendation that the City Council waive the base rent fee ($9,000.00), the move
in/out rental fee ($2,250.00) and the basic maintenance fee ($277.00) associated with the
Chamber's use of the Epicenter for their 2002 Grape Harvest Festival. The basic maintenance
service would only provide site supervision, utilities and street sweeping of the area at the
conclusion of the event. Daily trash pick up would need to be provided by the Chamber. The
Chamber has requested expanded maintenance services that includes daily refuse pick-up, site
supervision, utilities and street sweeping of the area. Staff would also request that the City Council
approve the waiver of fees for any building/fire inspections and permits. At this time the fiscal
impact of this portion of the request is not known.
As with other co-sponsored activities the Chamber of Commerce would still be required to provide
$1 million dollar comprehensive public liability coverage, $1 million dollar automobile coverage and
$1 million coverage for Worker's Compensation. Insurance documents should also include an
endorsement naming the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured for the full time frame
of the event including move-in and move-out dates as well as a refundable
damage/security/performance deposit in the amount of $2,500.00.
Staff does not recommend waiver of the fees for police security, the enhanced maintenance
services, the percentage on Chamber sold food, beverage and merchandise nor the
damage/security deposit as doing so would not be consistent with other City Council co-sponsored
activities that have taken place at the Epicenter. In addition, the Chamber has agreed to the
payment of the Admissions Tax for both gate admission and parking.
Lastly, staff also recommends that City Council approve the sale and consumption of beer and wine
for the Festival within restricted locations at the Epicenter Special Event Area (Expanded Parking
Lot), as outlined in Ordinance Number 634.
-2-
Cl'lY COUNCIL
Co-SPONSORSHIP OF GRAPE HARVEST FESTIVAL
AUGUST 21, 2002
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of co-sponsorship and waiver of fees as recommended by staff would result in a waiver of
$11,527 in fees, plus Building and Safety/Fire fees/inspections, that would be offset, in part, by
ticket, parking, concessions and memhandise revenues received from the event.
Kevin 1~ :Ardle
Commu~ ,'lty Services Director
Attachment
h~C~MM~ERv~c~unci~&B~ards~Cityc~unci~ta~Rep~rts~2~GrapeHarvestFestiva~c~Sp~ns~ship8~21~2~d~c
-3-
T H C I T Y O F
I~AN CH 0 CU CAM 0 N GA
Slaff Report
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Granting Authority to the City's PARSAC
Representative to Approve and Execute Amendments to the Joint
Powers Agreement
Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council approve the resolution granting authority to the
City's representative to the Public Agencies Risk Sharing Authority of California
(PARSAC) to approve and execute amendments to the joint powers authority
agreement.
Background
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a member of the Public Agencies Risk Sharing
Authority of California (PARSAC) which is an insurance pool that provides liability
and workers compensation indemnification to 36 member municipalities. The
Administrative Services Manager who holds a position as one of the directors of the
PARSAC board of directors represents the City. When the City joined PARSAC, it
signed several governing documents, including the Joint Powers' Agreement (JPA)
as part of its membership requirements.
From time to time, it is necessary to amend PARSAC's JPA so that member
agencies may benefit from the effectuated changes. Current JPA previsions require
each member's governing body to pass a resolution approving any amendments to
the JPA. This process is lengthy and cumbersome because it requires 36 separate
entities to take such action in order to approve any changes.
PARSAC is proposing that each of its'members, through the adoption of a
resolution, delegate authority to its representative and/or alternate to execute
amendments to the JPA. Therefore, staff is recommending that the City Council
7¥
Page 2
August 21, 2002
adopts the resolution authorizing the City's representative to execute amendments to
the JPA for the Public Agencies Risk Sharing Authority of California.
Respectfully Submitted
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
75
RESOLUTION NO. 02- Z 3 2
RESOLUTION OF The CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S DIRECTOR ON THE PUBLIC
AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO APPROVE AND EXECUTE
AMENDMENTS TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") is a Member Entity of the Public
Agency Risk Shadng Authority of California ("PARSAC"), a joint powers agency
providing risk management services, claims pooling and joint insurance benefits to its
members; and
WHEREAS, the City has appointed a Director and Alternate to serve on the Board of
Directors ("Director") of PARSAC;
WHEREAS, the City is authorized under State law to delegate to a designated
representative its authority to bind the City under contract;
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to grant explicit authority to its Director, and
Alternate, as the case may be, to approve and execute amendments to PARSAC's Joint
Powers Agreement on behalf of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga that:
1. Authorized Representative. The City'S Director is authorized to approve and
execute, on behalf of the City, any and all amendments to PARSAC's Joint Powers
Agreement. The Director shall execute amendments only after such amendments have
been duly and formally approved by PARSAC's Board of Directors. In the Director.s
absence, the person designated by the City as an alternate director of PARSAC shall
have the same power and authority as the Director when acting in the Director's place.
2. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Adopted this day of ., 2002.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21s' day of August 2002.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California at a regular meeting of said
City Council held on the 21st day of August 2002.
Executed this ., at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
77
I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002o00040,
LOCATED ON THE EAST SiDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF
SHARON CIRCLE, SUBMITTED BY PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
Improvement Agreement and improvement Security, ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00040, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Sharon Circle,
was approved by the City Planner on May 20, 2002, for the development of a 176,807
square foot building on 7.5 acres of land in the General Industrial District.
The Developer, Panattoni Development Company, is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $26,400.00
Labor and Material Bond: $13,200.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00040
August21,2002
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
Willi . O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MNB:sc
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
8TH Sm~'T
~RED
4TH STREET
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMOHGA
RESOLUTION NO. OZ-Z3,~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00040
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Panattoni Development
Company, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real
property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Hermosa
Avenue, north of Sharon Circle; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as DRC2002-00040; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest
thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof
by the City Attorney.
RESOLUT,ON NO. OZ- 2 $'-/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-
00040
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance
Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance
Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of
majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of
property within the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the
State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the
authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the
Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively,
the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of
annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in
Exhibit I~ hereto (the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To
A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real
Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act
to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly
consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00040
August 21, 2002
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972
Act and/or Article XlIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual
assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the
authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments
against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory
do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred
on each such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from
the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the
cost of the maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the
proposed annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements
from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves
and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed
the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy
of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT CO.
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 406 FOR LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT PER DOCUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 03, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 19970444346M, OFFICIAL RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 44.00 FEET
OF VACATION OF UNUSED 7TM STREET
A- 1 DRC2002-00040
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways,
street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the
Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within
this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on
an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the
facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets tlu-oughout the City
but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses
the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill
Boulevard.
B- 1 DRC2002-00040
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002)
For Project: DRC2002-00040
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 ...... * .........
SLD # 6 ...............
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L3B ......... 17
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessmem Units by District
Parcel Acres S I S 6 L 3B
N/A 7.5 ...... 7.5
B - 2 DRC2002-00040
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
I ,and 1 l~e l Init Tyne 1 lnit~ 1 lnit~ Factnr 1 lnils 1 Init Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2063.86 1.0 2063.86 $352.80 $728,129.81
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00040) is:
7.5 x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $2,646.40 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. Thc following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
I ,and 1J~e l Init Tyne l lnit~ I Init~ Factnr 1 lnit~ 1 Init Revenue
Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38
Multi-
Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51
Family
Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00
TOTAL $532,174.89
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00040) is:
7.5 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $266.55 Annual Assessment
C-1 DRC2002-00040 ~'7
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l .~nd 1 Ne 1 Init Tyne 1 lnit~ l Inlt~ Faetnr l lnit~ 1 Init Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00040) is:
7.5 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $385.50 Annual Assessment
C - 2 DRCDR01-03
P A C h 0 C U C A M 0 N G A
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Memorandum
DATE: August 19, 2002
TO: Jack Lam, AICP, C~ty Mana
.,,
FROM: William J. O Neil, City Engineer/.-~
BY: Julie Ungashick, Management'A'halyst I
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - CONSENT CALENDAR D-12 - APPROVE LICENSE
AGREEMENT WITH BOBBY BEENE FOR THE OPERATION OF A COFFEE
STAND AND ACCESSORIES WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
METROLINK STATION
The Vendor, Diana Hayden, is requesting this item be removed from the agenda (letter
attached). This item will be brought back to City Council at a later date.
WJO:ju
Attachment
RuC 19 02 10:23a RC Public Wopks /Maint, 909 477 2731
8301 Utica Avenue, Suite 201 Telephone: (909) 938-5185
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Fax: (909) 466-0318
August 19, 2002
Julie Sent via Facsimile No. (909) 477-2731
Ra~lcho Cucamonga City Yard
~RE: Coffee Can at the Rm~cho Cucamonga Metrolink Station
Dear Julic:
Thank you for your telephone call this momin& Pursuant to your request I am writing lo
request an extension of time to present this matter to the City Counsel meeting. As I
explained to you, ! am itt process of getting quotations for the liability insurance required
by the City in order to operate thc cart. I will keep you informed of my progress m this
regard so we can get the mailer before the City Counsel at the soonest date.
Thank you for all of your courtesy and cooperation in this regard.
Very truly yours,
I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Julie Ungashick, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: APPROVE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH BOBBY BEENE FOR THE
OPERATION OF A COFFEE STAND AND ACCESSORIES WITHIN THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached License Agreement with Bobby Beene for the
operation of a coffee stand and accessories within the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Bobby Beene has contacted City staff for approval to operate a coffee stand during the early morning
commute hours. This business would sell coffee and accoutrements at the City's Me~olink Station and meets
all County Health and Safety Code regulations.
The attached License Agreement is a one-year, non-exclusive agreement that provides for Ms. Haydcn to pay
the city Six Hundred Dollars a Month ($600.00/Month) to operate her coffee stand at the City's Metrolink
Station. The Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office and meets contract requirements of
the City which include applicable permits, insurance, and indemnification. There is also a provision to
terminate this Agreement upon a ten (10) day written notice to Licensee. Staff has also obtained the written
approval of SANBAG as required in the City's Cooperative Agreement with SANBAG to operate the City's
Metrolink Station. We believe this is an opportunity to provide a service to the City's Metrolink customers
and recommend this one-year License Agreement be approved.
Respectfully submitted, -
J. o %ell
City Engineer
WJO:DC.'ju
Attachments
T H E C ~ T Y 0 F
I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROMi Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BE'rVVEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT
RELATING TO JOINT USE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MIDDLE SCHOOL GYMNASIUM FACILITY
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached agreement between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga School District that provides for
Joint Use of the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School Gymnasium facility and
authorize the Mayor to sign the proposed agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Cucamonga School District is in the process of constructing a new gymnasium
facility at Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, which is expected to be complete in
the 2002-2003 school year. The Distdct staff is very supportive of providing access
to the gymnasium to the community during non-school hours and have worked with
the City staff to develop an agreement that specifically outlines scheduling,
supervision and maintenance responsibilities. That agreement is attached as Exhibit
No. 1.
In July of 1997, the City and District entered into an agreement for joint use of the
proposed gym to be constructed at Rancho Cucamonga Middle School. That 1997
joint use agreement was executed tO assist the Distdct in obtaining state funding for
the proposed project, which set a high priority on joint school/community projects.
The 1997 agreement included provisions for joint use, but did not include specific
scheduling times and responsibilities, which are critical to a successful partnership.
Page 2
August 21, 2002
APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT RELATING TO JOINT USE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MIDDLE SCHOOL GYMNASIUM FACILITY
Once the District obtained the funding for the gym and started construction in 2001,
staff from both the District and City met again to develop a much more specific
agreement that is being presented to the City Council this evening. The Cucamonga
School District Board of Trustees will consider approval of the agreement at their
meeting on August 22, 2002.
As indicated in the agreement, the new gymnasium will be scheduled for community
use on school days from 6:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. On Saturdays, the gym will be
available to the community from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. On non-school weekdays,
such as the summer months, the gym will be available from 1:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m.
The agreement provides the necessary guarantees to the District that the gym will
be available to them for special school events that are scheduled by June 1 each
year for the following school year. As can be seen in the agreement, the new
gymnasium will be highly scheduled with community programming, for which there is
a large need.
During the discussions over this agreement, the Cucamonga School District
Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent have remained committed to
improving the community by making the new gym available for programming outside
of school hours. Their efforts on behalf of the community are to be commended.
FISCAL IMPACT
The agreement requires the City to reimburse the District for a pro-rata share of
maintenance costs associated with community use. It is anticipated that these costs
will not exceed $20,000 per year.
Respectfully submitted,
Community Services Director
Attachment
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT
RELATING TO THE JOINT USE OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MIDDLE SCHOOL GYMNASIUM FACILITY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
,2002, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the CUCAMONGA
SCHOOL DISTRICT, San Bernardino County, California, hereinafter referred to
as "School District".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Sections 10900-10916, 17009.5 & 17052 inclusive, of the
Education Code of the State of California, authorize cities, counties and public
school districts to organize, promote and conduct such programs of community
recreation as will contribute to the attainment of general educational and
recreational objectives for the children and adults of the State; and
WHEREAS, School District has commenced the planning of a gymnasium
facility within the City; and
WHEREAS, City and School District recognize the public need for a
Gymnasium and desire to cooperate in the construction and use of the
Gymnasium to be constructed on the District Site located on the Rancho
Cucamonga Middle School campus; and
WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of City and School District to promote a
program of community recreation in connection with the use of this Gymnasium;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has expressed its support to
build a Gymnasium necessary for school and community use purposes and as
deemed eligible by the State Department of General Services, Office of Public
School Construction, provided that certain conditions are met including, but not
limited to, availability of a previously negotiated stream of Redevelopment
Agency revenue; and
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of City and the School District may
cooperate with each other to carry out the purposes of community recreation,
and to that end may enter into an agreement with each other and may do any
and all things necessary to aid and cooperate in carrying out the purposes of
community recreation including grant applications; and
WHEREAS, Sections 6500-6515 of the Government Code of the State of
California authorize public agencies through their governing bodies to jointly
exercise any power common to the contracting agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth
below, City and School District agree as follows:
1. Cooperative Efforts. School District and City shall cooperate in
providing a community recreation program under the authority contained in
Sections 10900-10916, 17009.5 & 17052 inclusive of Education Code of the
State of California, in connection with the use of the Gymnasium Building
referred to herein.
2. Construction of the Gymnasium. School District shall cause to be
constructed at the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, Rancho Cucamonga,
California (hereafter "the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School site"), a
gymnasium, (the "Gymnasium") to be owned by the School District upon
acceptance of the completed work. The Gymnasium shall be operated by the
School District and shall be used for school instruction/classes and for
community recreation purposes.
3. Consultants. School District shall employ engineering and architectural
consultants to design the Gymnasium.
4. Design Review. The Gymnasium shall be subject to design review as
provided by the Office of the State Architect regarding school facilities.
5. Plans for the Gymnasium. If the City requests changes to the plans
and specifications, the parties shall meet and discuss how the costs for such
changes should be allocated. The School District shall obtain all necessary
permits and pay all required fees and licenses for the construction of the
Gymnasium and shall comply with the rules and regulations of the State Office of
Public School Construction and the division of the State Architect."
6. Inspection Durin.q Construction. ^ licensed state approved inspector
shall be employed by the District for the Gymnasium project.
7. Final Inspection. Prior to the completion of construction of the
Gymnasium, the School District shall make a final inspection of the work prior to
the acceptance of the completed work.
8. Use Upon Acceptance. When the Gymnasium has been accepted by
the School District, School District shall make the Recreation Area defined as the
Gymnasium, entry area restreoms, and an office/storage room available to the
City for community recreation activities.
9. City's Contribution to Construction Costs of the Gymnasium. The
City's contribution to the construction costs of the project will be provided through
Redevelopment Agency funds passed through to Cucamonga School District as
detailed in a prior, separate agreement.
10. City's Contribution to Maintenance and Operations Costs of the
Gymnasium. Upon the filing of the Notice of Completion, City shall begin to incur
a share of the ongoing routine costs of maintaining the Gym including custodial
services, routine maintenance and repair costs, utility costs, and an annual
treatment of the hardwood floor. The City's share of such costs shall be based
upon the ratio of hours of availability for City use vs. hours of availability of
School District use as defined in section 13(b) of Agreement. District and City
also reserve the right to negotiate charges for unusual repair or costs. City and
District shall also be responsible for the full costs of repairs for damage that
occurs as a result of their respective uses of the facility.
School District shall invoice the City quarterly for ongoing routine
expenses and at such time as School District is required to pay other expenses.
District shall provide City with an annual summary of all costs associated
with the maintenance and operation of the Gym.
Modifications to the City's percentage share of costs and expense may be
made through a written Memo of Understanding executed by the City Manager
or designee and the School District Superintendent or designee.
11. Insurance. Upon the filing of the Notice of Completion, each party
shall procure and maintain in full force and effect or demonstrate proof to be
permissibly self-insured for the duration of this Agreement, Property and Liability
insurance which will protect each party against claims for injuries to persons or
damages to property which may arise from or in connection with that party's use
of the Gymnasium. District has reviewed the City's self insurance program and
accepts that program in lieu of primary insurance.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence for CG 001).
(2) Insurance Service Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, Code 1 (any auto).
B. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Each party shall maintain limits no less than:
3
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit
is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit
shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
12. Eminent Domain. In the event of a total, substantial, or partial taking
of the Gymnasium by a governmental agency exercising its right of eminent
domain, the rights of the parties with respect to the term and the award shall be
as the parties agree to be just and equitable under all the circumstances, having
in mind the economics of operating any remaining portion of the premises and
improvements, the cost of restoration, and the balance of the term remaining,
among other relevant considerations.
13. Community Use of Recreation Area. Upon completion of the
Gymnasium, the Recreation Areas shall be made available to the City for
community use, subject to the following:
a. The primary use will be for league play and other organized activities.
Use for activities other than league play/organized activities will occur
only with the approval of the School District. There will be no "open
play" times other than City supervised open play time restricted to
youth of age 14 and under.
b. The Recreation Areas shall be maintained in operable condition year
round, except for those periods of time required for floor resurfacing
and other facility repair or maintenance. The School District shall
maintain the Recreation Area and make all alterations, additions or
repairs required by law and bill the City for its share as described in
paragraph 10 of this agreement. The City shall have scheduling
privileges of the Gymnasium according to the following schedule:
1. On school days, the facility shall be available from 6:00 p.m. until
9:00 p.m.
2. On Saturdays, the facility shall be available from 9:00 a.m. until
5:00 p.m.
3. On non-school weekdays (e.g. summer), the facility shall be
available from 1:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m..
These times of availability may be modified by mutual agreement. The weekly
schedule may need to be altered for events scheduled such as Back-to-School
Night, Open House, evening performances and other usual night student
activities. These scheduling exceptions shall be mutually agreed upon by District
and City prior to June 1 of each year for the following school year. Additional
scheduling exceptions requests identified after June 1 for the following school
year will be accommodated only after discussion and mutual agreement.
c. At all times when the Recreation Area is used by the City, or the
School District, it shall be under the supervision and control of the
agency using it, its agents and employees and administered and
operated in accordance with all rules and regulations established by
the School District. City shall assume full responsibility for the
scheduling, supervision and control of recreational activities
conducted by City. City shall provide adequate and qualified
recreational personnel to fulfill these responsibilities. These
personnel will be provided keys and security codes to the facility. All
personnel employed in connection with the City's use of the
Recreation Area for recreational programs shall be deemed City
employees or its agents. The hiring, supervision and discipline of all
such personnel shall be the responsibility of City. Both parties shall
procure and maintain in full force and effect worker's compensation
insurance coverage, or be permissibly self-insured, for such
recreational personnel for any death, injury or illness arising in
connection with either party's performance under this Agreement.
d. City and School District shall furnish recreational and educational
apparatus and equipment according to the terms set forth herein.
Such equipment shall remain the property of the party furnishing it.
School District shall furnish and City shall furnish such recreational
and educational apparatus, as each deems appropriate for its
programs. City, may, with the express written approval of the School
District, furnish and install at its own expense, such additional
recreational and educational apparatus as it deems required in
connection with the performance of its recreational and educational
programs pursuant to this Agreement. Any such additional
apparatus may be stored at the Gymnasium so long as it does not
interfere in any way with the ordinary use by the School District of the
Gymnasium or the Recreation Area.
e. As authorized by Government Code Section 895.4 in connection with
the use of the Recreation Area pursuant to this Agreement:
(1) City shall indemnify, save and hold harmless School District, its
officers, agents and employees against any and all claims,
causes of action, suits, or judgments, including expenses
incurred therewith for death or injury to persons, or loss of or
damage to property, resulting from negligent acts of City, its
officers, agents, employees or invitees in the performance of
this Agreement. In the event of any such claim made, or suits
filed, School District shall give City prompt written notice
5
thereof, and City shall have the right to defend or settle the
same to the extent of its interest there under.
(2) School District shall indemnify, save and hold harmless City, its
officers, agents, and employees, against any and all claims,
causes of action, suits, or judgments, including expenses
incurred therewith of death or injury to persons or loss of, or
damage to, property, resulting form negligent acts of School
District, its officers, agents or employees in the performance of
this ^greement. In the event of any such claims made or suits
filed, City shall give School District proper notice thereof, and
School District shall have the right to defend or settle the same
to the extent of its interest hereunder.
f. Each agency shall be responsible for clean up in the Recreation
Area after use. Each agency shall make full effort to communicate
information regarding clean-up problems to the other agency in an
effort to improve housekeeping.
g. City and District shall assume responsibility for damage occurring to
the Gymnasium caused during their respective uses. In the event of
such damage during the City's period of use, the City shall
immediately notify the School District.
h. The City or the City's designated representative shall have the
exclusive use of a storage room for recreation purposes.
i. City and School District shall perform monthly safety checks, and
City will provide a copy to the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School
Principal.
j. City shall require the use of appropriate shoes which do not mark the
gym floor.
14. AssiRnment. Neither party shall have the right or power, without the
other party's written consent, to assign its rights or delegate its duties pursuant to
this Agreement. Each party shall not make any use of the Gymnasium or the
Recreation Area that is not in keeping with the purposes of this Agreement. This
provision shall not apply to either party's right to permit community groups and
organizations the right to use the Recreation Area during their respective
scheduling time periods.
15. Successor and Assiqns. This Agreement shall bind the successors
and assigns of the parties hereto.
16. Previous Agreements. This Agreement supersedes and replaces all
previous agreements by and between the City and School District as they may
pertain to the construction or use of the subject property.
17. Modifications. The terms and conditions of this Agreement may be
modified or changed only by written mutual consent of the parties.
18. Notices. Any notices that either party desires to or is required to give
to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served
personally or set by pre paid first class mail. Such notices shall be addressed to
the other party at the address set forth below. Either party may change its
address by notifying the other part of the change of address. Notice shall be
deemed communicated within seventy-two (72) hours from the date of mailing, if
mailed as provided in this paragraph.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cucamonga School District
City Hall 8776 Archibald Avenue
10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 '
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
19. The term of this Agreement shall be for 5 years, or the term required under
the State allocation grant whichever is the longer term. Following completion of
the initial term described above, the agreement shall be automatically renewed
for one (1) year periods on an annual basis unless the agreement is terminated
by either the District or City through the provision of a ninety (90) day advance
written notice to the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed the date and year first above written.
BY: BY:
Mayor President, Board of Trustees
ATTEST:
City Clerk Clerk, Board of Trustees
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney Attorney for Cucamonga School District
hlCOMMSERVtSCHOOLSICMSGymAgr~ement, Final
RA N C H O C U C A M O N G A
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
StaffRepo
DATF_: August 21,2[IJ2
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: FUND APPROPRIATION FOR CONTRACT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
Approval to appropriate $82,374 for contract development review services provided by
Employment Services Incorporated to be funded by the Community Development
Technical Services Fund Account No. 1016301-5300.
BACKGROUND
On November 7, 2000, the City Council approved funding for Contract Development
Review Services to be provided by Employment Services Incorporated. The funding
was renewed by the Council on September 5, 2001 for the period August 2001 through
July 2002. The current recent request will renew the funding for an additional year for
the same services covering the period August 2002 through July 2003.
[USTIFICATION
This position has been instrumental in providing development review service
improvements by:
1. Performing development review of P&E, TRC, EIR, fuel modification plans,
and prescriptive performance based code submittal responsibilities.
2. Developing enhanced methods and tools for developers to comply with Fire
District conditions of development
3. Providing relief to existing staff and allowing them to ret-urn to their primary
duties of inspection and fire investigation.
I:\Clerical\Word Processing Docs\Staff Reports\LocatiBudgetApproval02-O3.doc
qq
4. Providing reductions to current overtime expenditures for shift personnel to
conduct the above noted reviews.
5. Providing consistent liaison and support with and to the Building & Safety Fire
Construction Services section.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The cost of providing development review services is $82,374. Funding has been
appropriated in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2002/03 Budget in account number 1016301-
5300.
Attachment
-2-
lDO
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer rd~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,940.50
($50,855.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW
BIDDER, NEW WEST SIGNAL, FOR THE IN-ROADWAY WARNING
LIGHTS AT 19TM STREET (SR 30) AND JASPER STREET, TO BE FUNDED
FROM SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
12343035650, AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO.
11243035650, AND APPROPRIATE $20,400.00 TO ACCOUNT NO.
12343035650/1439234-0, TO BE FULLY REIMBURSED, AND
APPROPRIATE $5,600.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1439124-0
FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize
the execution of the contract in the amount of $55,940.50 ($50,855.00 plus 10%
contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, New West Signal, for the In-Roadway Warning
Lights at 19th Street and Jasper Street, to be funded from Safe Routes to School Program
funds, Account No. 12343035650, and Transportation Funds, Account No. 11243035650,
and appropriate $20,400.00 to Account No. 12343035650/1439234-0, to be fully
reimbursed, and appropriate $5,600.00 to Account No. 11243035650/1439124-0 from
Transportation fund balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on July 2, 2002, for
the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $30,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids
received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements;
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
19th & Jasperln-Roadway Lights
August21,2002
Page 2
however, bids were above the Engineer's Estimate and above the funds allotted in the Safe
Routes to School Program Grant. Caltrans grant administrators were contacted and
appropriate requests and forms were submitted. Additional grant funds were approved for a
project of $56,000.00 to include the amount of the bid received plus the normal 10%
contingency amount. The grant will reimburse the City 90% of the total grant project
amount or a maximum of $50,400.00 limited by actual construction costs. Staff has
completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the
requirements of the bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,
Wilt~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JG/RO:Is
Attachment
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JULY 2, 2002 APPARENT LOW BIDDER
IN-ROADWAY WARNING LIGHTS AT 19TH STREET (SR30) ENGINEERS COST Sierra Pacific Electrical
AND JASPER STREET ESTIMATE New West Signal F.J. Johnson~ Inc. Contracting
UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS In-RoadwayWaning l.ight~ at 19th St. and Jasper $30~000.00 $30,000.0C $50?855.00 $50,855.0(~ $58~110.00 $58~110.00 $62,564.001 $62~564.00
TOTAl. $30:000.001 $$0:855.00 $58:110.00 $62:564.00
Page
JASPER
~ ELEMENTARY
~ ~X:~T noAosm£ ~ SCHOOL
~l~T ROAO~O~ ~GN ~OUNI~ OK
~1~ ~N~ ~HIHG B~CONS
· FIGURE "A"
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
StaffRepo
DA'[~ August 21, 2002
~ Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION AND
AWARD A CONTRACT FOR SENIOR CENTER PROGRAMMING
SERVICES FROM GADABOUT TOURS INC. IN THE AMOUNT NOT
TO EXCEED $50,000 FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 12504015300.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the contract for services for Senior
Center Programming Services from Gadabout Tours Inc. in the amount not to
exceed $50,000 from account number 12504015300.
BACKGROUND
An important program offered by the City to residents, and particularly senior
citizens, is the opportunity for travel. Currently the Community Services Department,
through the Senior Center, conducts eighteen day trips per year, and offers the
choice of approximately 100 extended day tours and cruises throughout the U.S. and
around the world. Staff has successfully partnered with Gadabout Tours, Inc. of Palm
Springs, for the past 3 1/2 years to provide all of the tours advertised in their annual
catalogue. Gadabout Tours has conducted high quality, safe, and convenient tours
and cruises for 37 years. Their service features well planned quality tours, utilizing
superior buses, excellent accommodations, and professionally escorted tours, at a
competitive price. A convenient value for clients is that their trip includes a home
pick-up and delivery.
In our collaboration with Gadabout Tours, patrons have rated their travel experience
as extremely high and enjoyable. Staff has yet to witness a single poor result, as
Gadabout Tours has been quick to respond and accommodate issues that may
arise.
Page 2
August21,2002
Single Source Vendor, Tourand Cruise Services
Our responsibility in the process of offering these trips is to register clients for
existing planned tours and cruises advertised in Gadabout Tours catalogs and
newsletters. All prices and itineraries available in their catalog are also identical for
our clients. After receiving payment in full from clients, it is then the City's
responsible to pass on this payment to Gadabout Tours.
In turn, Gadabout Tours agrees to provide the City with a 10% Administrative Fee for
each reservation, blocked spaces on each trip, home pick-up and delivery, trip
packets for all passengers, the creation of specific attractive City of Rancho
Cucamonga flyers for all trips, and professional escorts. The City is under no
obligation to provide even a minimum number of passengers on any trip or cruise.
By offering a variety of high quality trips at reasonable prices, without the challenge
of requiring huge amounts of staff planning time, this program continues to meet the
needs of many residents as well as providing the City with approximately $5,000 of
revenue each year. Staff feels confident that clients can be assured they will be
registered on a safe, convenient, and quality trip.
Dd'
irector
attachment
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Services Department
Contract Services Agreement
This agreement is entered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga by and between the Community
Services Department, (hereinafter called CITY) and Gadabout Tours Inc., (hereinafter called
CONTRACTOR). Whereas the CITY desires to provide planned tours and cruises and whereas the
CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness and is qualified to undertake the required work in
connection therewith, the following provisions shall govern this Agreement.
1. TERMS: The initial terms of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year with
option to renew on an annual basis for a period not to exceed 3 years.
2. SERVICES PROVIDED: The CONTRACTOR agrees to furnish the following services
and venue to the CITY (A) a 2002 and 2003 annual catalog of high quality planned tours and
cruises in the U.S. and around the world for the CITY to participate in; (B) home pickups and
returns in Rancho Cucamonga; (C) spaces blocked on each tour; and (D) flyers on all trips,
(E) a 10% administrative payment to the CITY for each trip and cruise client.
3. CONDITIONS/ARRANGEMENTS: The CONTRACTOR is responsible for obtaining
and supplying all materials, supplies and equipment necessary to provide the service
including any permits. The CONTRACTOR is to provide and promote quality service and
reflect a positive image of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR is responsible for hiring their own
staff as needed.
4. COMPENSATION: The CITY agrees to provide thc CONTRACTOR full payment of all
registration fees from 45 to 60 days before departure depending on the specific tour or cruise.
5. CONTRACTOR: It is understood that the CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of
the City but is a self employed person and is therefore not eligible to lay claim to benefits
from Social Security, State Unemployment Insurance, or to those benefits reserved for
employees of the City. It is understood that the CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee
of the CITY.
/ 57
6. REPORTING OF INCOME: It is the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR for properly
reporting all monies earned as a result of work done for the CITY to the State and Federal
Governments. The CITY shall distribute Internal Revenue Form 1099 to the Federal
Government describing monies earned by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall
receive a copy for tax purposes.
7. TERMINATION: The CITY shall reserve the right to terminate this contract at any time,
upon the failure of the CONTRACTOR to comply with the terms and intent of the
Agreement.
8. ASSIGNMENTS: The CONTRACTOR shall not, under any cimumstances, assign this
contract or its duties without proper authorization from the CITY. Should such an
authorization be granted, the CONTRACTOR agrees to inform any subcontractor of all
stipulations of this agreement.
9. INSURANCE: CONTRACTOR shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it
has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to C1TY
nor shall CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until
all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONTRACTOR shall take out
and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of
insurance:
(a) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at
CONTRACTOR'S sole cost and expense, CONTRACTOR shall keep, or cause to be
kept, in full fome and effect, for the mutual benefit of the CITY and CONTRACTOR,
comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against
claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from
CONTRACTOR'S activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or
occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. If
such insurance includes an aggregate limit, such aggregate shall be no less than Two
Million Dollars ($2,000,000).
10. INDEMNIFICATION, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFENSE: The CONTRACTOR
hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
its directors, officers, employees, and agents for any damage or injury to any person or
property from any cause whatsoever which may incur, due to the presence and/or activities of
the CONTRACTOR on or about premises owned and/or controlled by the CITY, except for a
cause of injury or damage which is the result of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of
the CITY, its employees or servants.
11. PREVIOUS AGREEMENT: Any and all existing agreements or renewals between the
parties hereto, covering the same subject matter, are hereby canceled and superseded by this
agreement and such prior arrangements shall have no further force or effect.
12. This agreement is to be completed, signed and submitted three (3) weeks prior to the
event/activity in order to receive payment in time and on day o f event/activity. Any contract
received by the Community Services Department with less than three weeks prior to the
event or activity will necessitate payment to be mailed directly to the vendor (at the address
indicated below) up to three weeks after the event or activity.
City of Rancho Cucamonga Contractor
Mayor Name
Date Address
Attest: City
City Clerk Telephone
Tax ID #
Signature
Date
T H C I T Y O F
I~AN CH 0 CUCAHONGA
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
F'R(]Vt Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION AND AWARD A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF TVVO (2) ROLLER HOCKEY BORDERS
FROM PACIFIC DESIGN CONCEPTS IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$23,500 FROM ACCOUNT #12504015605
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of two Roller Hockey Border
Rinks from Pacific Design Concepts as a single source purchase in an amount not to exceed
$23,500 from account 12504015605. The total amount is currently budgeted in the Maintenance
& Operations account 12504015200 which should be transferred to Capital Equipment account
12504015605.
BACKGROUND
The Community Services Department offers a Roller Hockey League for youth in the community
from ages 5 - 15. These leagues are held at the Epicenter's Expanded Parking Lot on Rochester
Avenue. in order to utilize the parking lot as a Roller Hockey rink it is necessary to use border
patrols, which are designed to keep the ball or puck in play during the hockey game. These
border patrols are 22 inches in height and made with heavy-duty foam core and vinyl covered.
They are designed to stack easily for storage and transportation and are also easy to set-up and
tear-down.
Pacific Design Concepts is the Southern California distributor for the manufacturer of this
product. The product is price protected by the manufacturer, which does not allow other
distributors to offer the product at any lower price. For this reason it is not feasible to receive
competil 'e quotes.
CommL ity Services Director
CI'TY OF RANCHO CUCAt4ONGA BUDGET APPROPRI'ATI'ON TRANSFER REQUEST
Fiscal Year: 2002/2003 Verify Availability of Funds gefore
Department: Community Services Submitting Transfer Request
Requested By: Karen Silhanek Date: 7/31/2002 * Round to the highest $10
I~r~r"K rKum: TRANSFER TO:
Balance Balance
Before Transfer Before Transfer
ACCOUNT # PROJECT NAME Transfer Amount * ACCOUNT # PROJECT NAME Transfer Amount *
12504015200 Vlaint. & Operations 290,000 23,500 12504015605 Capital Equipment O 23,500
Total: 23,500 Total: 23,500
Reason For Transfer:
To purchase Roller Hockey Border Patrol as Capital Equipment item.
NOTE: I. Appropriation transfers of $10,000 or [ess require approval of the Finance Officer.
2. Appropriation transfers of $ t ,001 to $20,000 require approval of the Finance Officer, Administrative Services Director, and the City Manager.
3 Appropriation transfers ex ding $20,000 r ire prior authorization of the Finance Officer, Administrative Services Director, Cit~ Manager,
and the approva of the Ci Council. R er he Policy For Budget Appropriations for specific instructions.
· APPROVAL
Adrnin. Styes. Dir.: Date: Finance Officer: Date:
City Manager: Date: Processed By: Date:
Ref. #:
T H C I T Y O F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DA[E: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION AND
AWARD A CONTRACT FOR OFFICIATING/UMPIRING SERVICES
FOR ADULT SPORTS LEAGUES TO UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $6,000 FROM ACCOUNT
#12504015300 AND $69,000 FROM ACCOUNT 17004015305.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the contract for services for
officiating/umpirin§ of adult sports leagues to Umps Are Us Association in the amount not to
exceed $6,000 from account #12504015300 and $69,000 from account 17004015305.
BACKGROUND
The Umps Are Us Association has been providing certified officials for the Adult Sports
Programs since the spring of 1993. Umps Are Us has consistently provided knowledgeable,
trained, and professional umpire. In addition, Umps Are Us has a representative at all
Managers Meetings. Umps Are Us has met all of their contract obligations over the last nine
years.
Prior business dealing between the City and Umps Are Us demonstrated that they have the
experience, capacity, and skill to perform the contract as required.
Kevin Ml:Ardle, Community Services Director
attachment
I/Z-.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Services Deparlment
Contract Services Agreement
This agreement is entered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga by and between the Community
Services Department, (hereinafter called CITY) and Umps Are Us Association, (hereinafter called
CONTRACTOR). Whereas the CITY desires to provide officials for adult sports leagues and
whereas the CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness and is qualified to undertake the required
work in connection therewith, the following provisions shall govern this Agreement.
1. TERMS: The initial terms of this Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year with
option to renew on an annual basis for a period not to exceed 3 years.
2. SERVICES PROVIDED: The CONTRACTOR agrees to furnish the following: (A)
officials for all Flag Football games scheduled, (B) officials for all Basketball games
scheduled, (C) officials for all adult Softball games scheduled.
3. CONDITIONS/ARRANGEMENTS: The CONTRACTOR is responsible to demonstrate
certification, as deemed appropriate by the city, of a reasonable level of qualification to
perform officiating services. CONTRACTOR shall provide officiating services at times and
dates as specified on the league schedules. CONTRACTOR shall arrange for any and all
substitute officials. The CONTRACTOR shall have all scheduled officials arrived no later
than 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start of the games. The CONTRACTOR, shall abide
by all laws, city rules/ordinances in a manner that invites respect and integrity of the city in
which they represent. If any officials do not abide by these standards, the CITY has the
authority to relinquish the officials duties. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for their
officials to be dressed in the proper game attire. The CONTRACTOR agrees to attend any
official's meetings deemed mandatory by the CITY.
4. COMPENSATION: The CITY agrees to provide the CONTRACTOR payment as follows:
(A) Flag Football games - $40 per game (B) Basketball games - $40 per game, (C) Softball
games - $23 per game.
5. CONTRACTOR: It is understood that the CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of
the City but is a self employed person and is therefore not eligible to lay claim to benefits
from Social Security, State Unemployment Insurance, or to those benefits reserved for
employees of the City. It is understood that the CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee
of the CITY.
113
6. REPORTING OF INCOME: It is the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR for properly
reporting all monies earned as a result of work done for the CITY to the State and Federal
Governments. The CITY shall distribute Internal Revenue Form 1099 to the Federal
Government describing monies earned by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall
receive a copy for tax- purposes.
7. TERMINATION: The CITY shall reserve the right to terminate this contract at anytime,
upon the failure of the CONTRACTOR to comply with the terms and intent of the
Agreement. If either party is in violation of any contractual agreements or not satisfied with
the services rendered them is a 30-day notice needed to cancel this contract.
8. ASSIGNMENTS: The CONTRACTOR shall not, under any circumstances, assign this
contract or its duties without proper authorization from the CITY. Should such an
authorization be granted, the CONTRACTOR agrees to inform any subcontractor of all
stipulations of this agreement.
9. INSURANCE: CONTRACTOR shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it
has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY
nor shall CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until
all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONTRACTOR shall take out
and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of
insurance:
(a) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at
CONTRACTOR'S sole cost and expense, CONTRACTOR shall keep, or cause to be
kept, in full fome and effect, for the mutual benefit of the CITY and CONTRACTOR,
comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against
claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from
CONTRACTOR'S activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) for bodily injmy or death to any one person or for any one accident or
occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. If
such insurance includes an aggregate limit, such aggregate shall be no less than Two
Million Dollars ($2,000,000).
10. INDEMNIFICATION, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFENSE: The CONTRACTOR
hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless The City of Rancho Cucamonga,
its directors, officers, employees, and agents for any damage or injury to any person or
property from any cause whatsoever which may incur, due to the presence and/or activities of
the CONTRACTOR on or about premises owned and/or controlled by the CITY, except for a
cause of injury or damage which is the result of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of
the CITY, its employees or servants.
11. PREVIOUS AGREEMENT: Any and all existing agreements or renewals between the
parties hereto, covering the same subject matter, are hereby canceled and superseded by this
agreement and such prior arrangements shall have no further force or effect.
12. This agreement is to be completed, signed and submitted three (3) weeks prior to the
event/activity in order to receive payment in time and on day of event/activity. Any contract
received by the Community Services Department with less than three weeks prior to the
event or activity will necessitate payment to be mailed directly to the vendor (at the address
indicated below) up to three weeks after the event or activity.
Community Services Department Contractor
Community Services Director Name
Date Address
Attest: City
City Clerk Telephone
Tax ID #
Signature
Date
//5
T H E C I T Y 0 F "~l'll
I~AN CH 0 CUCAHONGA
Staff Report
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO ENTER INTO A LEASE HOLD AGREEMENT AT RED HILL
PARK BETWEEN AT&T AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE
PURPOSE OF INSTALLING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
FOR AT&T'S WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE.
REcoMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor sign the Agreement, thereby entering
into a Lease Hold Agreement with AT&T Wireless.
BACKGROUND: Compass Telecom Services, Inc., on behalf of AT&T Wireless Services, has
been negotiating a Lease Hold Agreement with City staff for the placement of one stealth, minor
wireless communication facility. The wireless communication facility will be located at Red Hill
Park. The design of the wireless communication facility will be a 70-foot monopine, utilizing
panel style antennas. The Planning Division approved a Minor Development Review on
July 2, 2002, for the AT&T wireless facility.
ANALYSIS: Community Development Staff, in conjunction with the City Attorney's office, has
been reviewing multiple draft agreements over the past several weeks. A final Agreement
(attached) has been accepted by the City Attorney's office, and contains the following key items
and conditions:
· LOCATION: The improvement shall consist of one 70-foot monopine located at Red Hill
Park, surrounded by 4 existing pine trees. The panel antennas shall be painted to match
the foliage and the branches, and the needles and tree bark will be simulated to match
real pine trees. There are clusters of mature pine trees to the south and west of the
proposed monopine. There is an existing cellular facility mounted on top of a baseball
field light standard, approximately 150 feet to the southeast of the proposed monopine.
The facility will include a new 12-foot by 20-foot equipment shelter that will match the
existing equipment shelter/restroom building.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LEASE HOLD AGREEMENT - RED HILL PARK
August21,2002
Page 2
· TERMS AND OPTIONS: The initial term of the lease shall be 10 years, with four, 5-year
options to extend. The lease shall commence when construction starts or 90 days after
the lease is executed by both parties, whichever occurs first.
· RENT AND RENT INCREASES: The initial annual rent shall be $18,000.00
($1,500/month), paid in equal monthly installments in advance on or before the first day of
each month. Commencing with the second year, on the anniversary of the
commencement date, and in succession thereafter, rent shall be increased by an amount
equal to 3 pement of the rent for the previous year.
· ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Subject to the City's written consent, Cingular may
permit other wireless communication carriers to locate on the monopine. Should this
occur, the lease provides a provision to ensure additional compensation to the City, as
negotiated between the City and the carrier, by a separate lease. Alternatively, at the
City's option, the annual rent may be increased by a straight pementage, agreeable to the
City and the wireless carrier, not to exceed 30 percent of the current rent. This provision
in the lease meets of the objectives of the City's Development Code by encouraging co-
location of wireless carriers where possible.
· POWER GENERATORS: The lease contains language only allowing temporary
generators in the case of an emergency or power failure.
· SIGNS: Only signs that are required for emergency purposes are permitted on the
wireless communication facility.
· TERMINATION AND ABANDONMENT: Should the lease be terminated by either party,
expire, or the wireless communication facility become abandoned, the wireless facility and
all appurtenant equipment shall be removed within 60 days of said termination, expiration,
or abandonment, and the premises shall be restored to its original condition.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DG/jc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B"- Photo Simulation
Final Lease Agreement and Memorandum of Lease
//7
BASELINE STREET
COVERED PATIO
PLANTER
(E) PARK
BUILDING (E) WALK WAY
PROPOSED 12' X 20'
AT&:T EQUIPMENT SHELTER
70'
(E) PARKING -, ~-~
-- PROPOSED MONOPINE
(,~ ANTENNAS PER SECTOR ,3 SECTOR TOTAL) .,,~..~
EXHIBIT "A"
~ ,~¢- ~: D 121
----
AT&T ~
C~ S '--'
,~,~.~ .~..~,~ cm' o¢ ~cuo
EXISTING VIEW A
PROPOSED VIEW A LOOKING SOUTH FROM BASELINE
EXISTING VIEW B
PROPOSED VIEW B LOOKING WEST FROM VINEYARD
FOOTHILL / VINEYARD
~'-_ AT&T
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
SITE NAME: FOOTHILL/VINEYARD
SITE NUMBER: D121A
81TE QUALIFICATION pARTI~IPANT~
BASELINE STREET
~ ~ , ............. .,., ,.,.,., ,.. :.: +........:.: .....
~ · :,:,:,:;::.:.U.: :¥ :: ::: ::~ '.'..E.' .: ~,.. ,,
COMMUNICATIONS
FACILITY GROUND LEASE
This Lease is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF Rancho
Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "LANDLORD") and AB
Cellular LA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company d/b/a AT&T Wireless (hereinafter
referred to as "TENANT").
1. Premises. LANDLORD hereby agrees to lease to TENANT and
TENANT agrees to lease t~om LANDLORD, on a non-exclusive basis, that certain parcel of
real property, approximately 1100 square feet in area, together with reasonable access thereto
(seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours a day) located at Red Hill Community Park in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, commonly known by the street address of 7484
Vineyard Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA, hereinafter referred to as "the Premises", or as more
particularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. This
Lease is subject to the terms, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth and TENANT
covenants, as a material part of the consideration for this Lease, to keep and perform each and
every term, covenant and condition of said Lease.
2. Term.
A. The term of this Lease shall be for ten (10) years, subject to four
(4)five (5) year extensions, as provided in paragraph B below, commencing upon the effective
date hereof, provided, however, that TENANT's obligations to pay rent hereunder, shall not
begin until TENANT commences construction of its facilities upon the Premises or ninety
(90) days after the effective date hereof, whichever occurs first.
B. In the event that TENANT shall not be in default in the performance
of any term or condition under this Lease (with all cure periods having lapsed), then upon the
expiration of the original Lease term, or any prior renewal term(s), upon ninety (90) calendar
days prior written notice to LANDLORD, TENANT shall have the option to renew this Lease
for four (4) additional terms of five (5) years each. During any such renewal period, all of the
terms and conditions of this Lease shall remain in full force and effect. Commencing with the
644418-1
first day of the first month of the respective renewal period, the rent for the Premises shall be
increased in accordance with the provisions set forth in paragraph 3, below.
Said option(s) shall be exercised by personal delivery or by certified mail,
postage prepaid, of such notice of exercise of option to LANDLORD at the address set forth
herein for notices. Such exercise of the option(s) granted hereunder shall automatically extend
the term of this Lease upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, and no further writing
need be executed by TENANT or LANDLORD. In the event that any option specified herein
is not exercised as provided, within the time period provided, then said option and remaining
options, if any, shall expire, and TENANT shall not have any right to renew said Lease.
C. Upon termination, both parties shall be relieved of any further
obligations under this Lease, although each shall continue to have available all remedies for
any breach of this Lease occurring prior to the date of termination. Within sixty (60) days
following the expiration or termination of this Lease, TENANT shall remove its personal
property and fixtures and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and
tear excepted and further excepting landscaping and related irrigation equipment, or other
aesthetic improvements made by TENANT to the Premises.
3. Rent. TENANT agrees to pay to LANDLORD rent, without prior
notice or demand by LANDLORD, in the sum of Eighteen Thousand Dollars ($18,000.00) per
year, paid in equal monthly installments in advance on or before the first day of each month
during the term of this Lease. Said rent shall be paid to LANDLORD, without deduction or
offset, in lawful money of the United States of America, at 10500 Civic Center Drive, P.O.
Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729, or at such other place as LANDLORD may
designate, in writing.
Beginning with year two (2) of the term, and each year thereafter, including
throughout any option terms exercised, the monthly rent will be increased by three percent
(3%) over the previous year's rent.
4. Use.
A. TENANT shall use the Premises for the sole purpose of constructing,
maintaining, securing and operating a personal wireless service facility (as defined in Section
644418-1
704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996), including the consl~uction of an equipment
building (if needed) and installation of required Utilities, antennas and related communications
equipment, including telephone equipment, electrical equipment, HVAC systems, temporary
power generator for emergency purposes only, fire sprinkler systems, and an antenna tower and
support structures, subject to being "stealth" designed as may be required by LANDLORD, all
as depicted in the site plan and related drawings approved by LANDLORD, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and hereby incorporated by reference. Each such antenna or
antenna support structure may be configured as required by TENANT, provided TENANT
obtains all permits and approvals required by LANDLORD and/or any other Public agency
having jurisdiction over the matter. No additional equipment or antennas which would be
visible to the public may be installed without LANDLORD's prior written consent.
Furthermore, LANDLORD and TENANT may agree to increase the square footage of real
property occupied by TENANT, by no more than ten pement (10%) by letter agreement,
subject to TENANT paying additional rent on a pro-rata basis.
B. TENANT and LANDLORD understand and agree that subject to
LANDLORD's written consent pursuant to Section 17 hereof, TENANT may permit other
communications providers to locate on TENANT's communications tower for which
TENANT, and LANDLORD for its provision of the underlying real property, shall be entitled
reasonable compensation by way of leases negotiated in good faith. Alternatively, and at
LANDLORD's option, LANDLORD shall be entitled to increase rent payable to LANDLORD
in an amount determined by the parties to be fair and equitable, but in no case greater than
30 % of the current rent.
C. TENANT shall install a security fence or wall around the perimeter
of the Premises, satisfactory to LANDLORD, excluding any approved access route(s).
Construction of TENANT's communications facility shall be at TENANT's sole expense.
Further, TENANT shall maintain the Premises free from hazards or risk to the public health,
safety or welfare.
D. At all times throughout the term of this Lease, TENANT's use of the
Premises shall be in conformance with, and subject to all conditions contained in, any and all
644418-1
permits or approvals required by LANDLORD and/or any other agency having jurisdiction
over TENANT's operations.
E. LANDLORD agrees that TENANT's ability to use the Premises is
dependent upon TENANT's obtaining all necessary certificates, permits and/or other approvals
which may be required from any federal, state or local authority. LANDLORD agrees to
cooperate with TENANT as to TENANT's obtaining such certificates, permits or other
approvals. In the event TENANT is unable to obtain any necessary certificate, permit or other
approval in order to operate its communications facility, or if due to technological changes
TENANT, in its sole discretion, determines that it will be unable to use the Premises for
TENANT's intended purposes, TENANT may terminate this Lease as provided herein, upon
thirty (30) days prior written notice.
F. TENANT shall not do or permit anything to be done in or about the
Premises nor bring or keep anything therein which will cause cancellation of any insurance
policy coveting the Premises or part thereof or portion of its contents. TENANT agrees to pay
any increase in the rate of fire or other insurance policy coveting the Premises which is due to
TENANT's leasing of the Premises. TENANT shall not do or permit anything to be done in or
about the Premises which will in any way obstruct or interfere with the tights of other parties
or injure or annoy them or use or allow or permit the Premises to be used for any unlawful
purpose. Nor shall TENANT cause, maintain or permit any nuisance in or about the Premises.
TENANT shall not commit or suffer to be committed any waste in or upon the Premises.
G. TENANT agrees at all.times to maintain its levels of
electromagnetic radiation within all applicable standards established by the Federal
Communications Commission and/or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction.
TENANT agrees at all times to conduct its personal wireless service operations in such a
manner so as to not cause interference with any of LANDLORD's existing communications
operations. A failure to cure any such interference within five (5) business days of the City's
providing written notice of such interference shall constitute a default hereunder. In the event
any of TENANT's operations interfere with LANDLORD's emergency communications,
LANDLORD may provide telephonic notice to TENANT of such interference and TENANT
644418-1
131
shall, within twenty-four (24) hours, cease all communications operations on the Premises,
until the condition causing the interference is remedied to LANDLORD's satisfaction. Subject
to the provisions of this sub section as shown in Exhibit B, Landlord will not grant, after the
date of this Lease, a lease, license or any other right to any third party for the use of the
property within 130 feet of the Premises, if such use may adversely affect or interfere with
Tenant's communications facility. For the purposes of this provision, "interference" may
include, but is not limited to, any other use on the property or any other use on Landlord's
other properties that causes electronic, physical or obstruction interference with, or degradation
of the communications signals fi.om Tenant's facility. In general, pre-existing facilities
expressly excluded, the parties agree that the physical location of another 800 Mhz to
2500 Mhz communications facility within one hundred thirty feet (130') of Tenant's facility
will most likely cause interference and, accordingly, Landlord will not allow such future uses
within this distance from Tenant's location without the prior written consent of Tenant. Should
a carrier cause interference to Tenant's facility, Landlord shall assist Tenant in contacting the
interfering carrier and bringing said radio interference to Tenant's facility to termination. If
Tenant notifies Landlord that there is interference, and if such interference is not cured within
ten (10) calendar days, Tenant will have the option to (i) terminate this Lease by giving
Landlord ten (10) days' written notice of its election to terminate, or (ii) if Tenant elects not to
terminate this Lease, Landlord agrees to allow Tenant, in place of Landlord,, to take any
action, in law or in equity, necessary to cause the interfering lessee or licensee to eliminate
such interference. Tenant acknowledges that its grant does not exclude other communication
facilities on the Property (other than the Premises and a one hundred thirty foot (130') radius
from the Premises) and Tenant agrees to reasonably cooperate with Landlord and other
potential communication facility operators as to their proposed operations not inconsistent with
this Lease. LANDLORD agrees to include in any other telecommunication leases for lease of
its property within 1000 feet of the Premises, a provision requiring such additional lessee to
avoid causing radio interference to TENANT's operations hereunder.
Tenant acknowledges and agrees that Landlord has granted approval and has existing
lease agreements with two (2) wireless communication carriers, presently doing business as
644418-1
132-
Verizon Airtouch Cellular and COX PCS on Landlord's property at Red Hill Community Park..
Tenant agrees that Tenant's personal wireless service facility shall not cause interference with
the communications operations of these two (2) pre-approved, pre-existing wireless
communication facilities as long as they operate and continue to operate in accordance with all
applicable laws and regulations. Tenant agrees to comply with all Federal Communications
Commission provisions and all the provisions set forth in the Technical Requirements for
Third Party Collocation, attached hereto as "Attachment 1", in designing, locating and
operating its transmitting equipment and in reconfiguring or the frequency or operation of such
equipment.
5. Compliance with Law.
TENANT shall .not use the Premises or permit anything to be done in or about
the Premises which will in any way conflict with any law, statute, ordinance or other
govemmental rule or regulation now in force or which may hereinafter be enacted or
promulgated. Subject to TENANT's fight to terminate as provided in Section 4.E, TENANT
shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly comply with all laws, statutes, ordinances and
other governmental rules, regulations or requirements now in force or which may hereinafter
be enacted or promulgated, relating to, or affecting the condition, use or occupancy of the
Premises, excluding structural changes not related to or affected by TENANT's improvements
and acts. The judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction or the admission by TENANT in
any action against TENANT, whether LANDLORD be a party thereto or not, that TENANT
has violated any law, statute, ordinance or any other governmental rule or regulation shall be
conclusive of that fact as between LANDLORD and TENANT.
6. Alterations and Additions. Other than as expressly required or
permitted herein, TENANT shall not make or suffer to be made any alterations, additions or
improvements in or to or about the Premises or any part thereof without the prior written
consent of LANDLORD. Excepting only the approved installation of communications related
equipment, any alterations, additions Or improvements in, to or about the Premises, shall on the
expiration of this Lease become a part of the realty and belong to LANDLORD and shall be
surrendered with the Premises, unless otherwise agreed to by LANDORD and TENANT. Any
644418-1
alterations, additions or improvements to the Premises desired by TENANT, other than those
expressly required or permitted herein, shall require LANDLORD's prior written consent, and
shall be made by TENANT at TENANT's sole cost and expense, and any contractor or person
selected by TENANT to make the same must first be approved of, in writing, by LANDLORD.
Tenant has the fight to modify, supplement, replace, upgrade, expand the equipment, increase
the number of antennas or relocate the communication facility within the Premises at any time
during the term of this Lease. However, any changes visible to the public, which expand the
facility shall require Landlord's prior written consent.
7. Physical Condition of Premises~ Waiver.
A. By taking possession of the Premises, TENANT shall be deemed to
have accepted the Premises as being in good sanitary order, condition and repair. TENANT
shall, at TENANT's sole cost and expense, keep the Premises and any part thereof in good
condition and repair. LANDLORD shall have no obligation whatsoever to alter, improve or
repair the Premises, or any part thereof, and the parties hereto affirm that LANDLORD has
made no representations to TENANT respecting the condition of the Premises except as
specifically set forth herein. TENANT further agrees that it shall submit to LANDLORD,
prior to applying for any permits to renovate, reconstruct, improve, alter or in any way modify
the Premises, plans and specifications for LANDLORD's approval.
B. LANDLORD shall not be liable for any failure to make any repairs, or
to perform any maintenance except as specifically provided herein. Except as may otherwise
be provided herein, there shall be no abatement of rent and no liability of LANDLORD by
reason of any injury to or interference with TENANT's business arising from the LANDLORD
or TENANT making of any repairs, alterations or improvements in or to any portion of the
Premises or in or to any fixtures, appurtenances and equipment therein. TENANT hereby
specifically waives the right to make repairs at LANDLORD's expense under any law, statute
or ordinance now or hereafter in effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, LANDLORD shall be
responsible for any damage to TENANT's equipment or facilities caused by LANDLORD's
activities.
644418-1
C. TENANT shall accept possession of the Premises, in an "as is" physical
condition with no warranty, express or implied, by LANDLORD as to the condition of the soil,
its geology, the presence of known or unknown faults, its suitability for the use intended by the
TENANT, any onsite soils contamination or any similar matters. It shall be the sole
responsibility and obligation of TENANT to investigate and correct any adverse soil, surface
or subsurface conditions of the Premises, and to take such action as may be necessary to place
the Premises in a condition entirely suitable for the use intended by TENANT and agreed to by
LANDLORD as is set forth herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, LANDLORD represents
that to the best of its knowledge, no activities of LANDLORD have resulted in any soils
contamination.
D. TENANT hereby specifically waives any rights TENANT may have
against LANDLORD with regard to the condition of the Premises, including, but not limited
to, soils, toxic or hazardous materials, fill material, compaction, geologic constraints and
faults, except to the extent caused by Landlord. TENANT also further agrees to indemnify and
hold harmless LANDLORD from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages;
demands, actions, judgments, causes of action, assessments, penalties, costs and expenses
(including without limitation, the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal counsel, expert
witnesses and accountants) and all foreseeable and unforeseeable consequential damages
which might arise or be asserted against LANDLORD as a result of a claimed violation
allegedly occurring following TENANT acceptance of the Premises, of any and all present and
future federal, state and local laws (whether under common law, statute, i-ule, regulation or
otherwise), including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 through 9657,
inclusive; Transportation of Hazardous Materials and Wastes (HMTA), 49 U.S.C. App. §§
1801 through 1813, inclusive; the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 through 6992, inclusive; 40 C.F.R. Parts 260 through 271, inclusive; the
California Hazardous Substance Account Act (HSAA), California Health and Safety Code §§
25300 through 25395, inclusive; the California Hazardous Waste Control Act (HWCA),
California Health and Safety Code §§ 25100 through 25249, inclusive; the Porter-Cologne
644418-1
Water Quality Control Act, California Water Code §§ 13000 through 13999.16, inclusive; and
the Underground Storage Tank Act (USTA), California Health and Safety Code § § 24280
through 24299.7, inclusive, all as the same may be amended from time to time, relating to the
environment or to any hazardous substance, activity or material connected with the condition
of the Premises except to the extent caused by Landlord. This environmental indemnity shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Lease as to activities taking place or occurring on
or about the Premises prior to such expiration or termination.
SAID WA1V~ICALLY AGREED TO BY TENANT.
By: ~ ~e~// i~ ~-.._ ..
~Pregler"~ ~
E. LANDLORD shall, upon request and at TENANTs cost, provide to
TENA~TT copies of all r~o~ts, studies, sur~c~s and other data and information on the Premises
wNch is now available to L^NDLOR.D. LANDLORD represents that it has no iz~t'ormation
disclosable pursuant to California Health ~md Safer7 Code § 25359.7(a).
8. Claims A~ainst Premises. TENANT shah not suff~ or permit to be
enforced against the Premises, or any pa~t thereof, any mccha~Jc's, mat~alman's, con,actor's
or subcontractor's liens a~siag from, or any claim for any work of construction, repair,
restoration, replacement or improvement of or to the ?remises or any other similar claim or
demand howsoever the same may arise, but TENAN~ shall pay or cause to be paid any and all
such claims or demands before any action is brought to enforce the same a~alast the ?remises.
TENAN~ agrees to inderrmi~ and hold LANDLORD and the Premises free and harm]ess of
all liability for a~y ~nd all such claims a~d demands, together with payment of LANDLORD's
reasonable attorneys' fccs and all costs and expenses in connection therewith.
9. Utilities. TENANT shall pay thc cost of any and all water, e]ect~cal,
~as or other utility se~ices utilized b~ TENA]',T~ upon the Premises during thc tcn~ hereof and
shall have such utilities installed uader~otmd and maintained at TENANT's sole cost and
expense, subject to p]a~s and specifications approved in writing by ~A_NDLO]~).
LANDLORD shall approve or d~sapp~ovc o~s~c w~thi~ ~ou~ccn 04) da~s.
644418-1
/3/,,
10. Taxes. TENANT shall pay, or cause to be paid, before delinquency, any
and all taxes levied or assessed and which become payable during the term hereof upon all of
TENANT's possessory interest in and to the Premises, leasehold improvements, equipment,
fixtures and personal property located in or about the Premises. TENANT agrees that, without
prior demand or notice by LANDLORD, TENANT shall, not less than fifteen (15) days prior
to the day upon which any such possessory interest or other such tax is due, provide
LANDLORD with proof of payment of such tax.
11. Holding Over. If TENANT remains in possession of the Premises or
any part thereof after the expiration of the term hereof, with the express written consent of
LANDLORD, such occupancy shall be a tenancy from month-to-month.
12. Entr~ by LANDLORD. TENANT hereby agrees that representatives
of the LANDLORD, as designated by LANDLORD's City Manager, shall, during normal
business hours, have the right to enter the Premises with a representative of TENANT to
inspect and determine if same complies with each and every term and condition of this Lease
and with all applicable City, County, State and Federal laws, rules, ordinances and regulations
relating to building occupancy and the conduct of TENANT's business, provided LANDLORD
gives TENANT no less than forty-eight (48) hours prior whtten notice. TENANT hereby
waives any claim for damages or for any injury or inconvenience to or interference with
TENANT's business, any loss of occupancy or quiet enjoyment of the Premises, and any loss
occasioned thereby. LANDLORD shall at all times have and retain a key with which to
unlock, in the event of emergency, any entrances to any perimeter enclosures (fencing, etc.)
surrounding TENANT's facilities. It is expressly agreed that LANDLORD shall not have a
key to TENANT's facilities, except as provided above, and TENANT expressly waives any
and all damages which might occur to TENANT's facilities including, but not limited to,
damages arising from fire, vandalism, explosion or earthquake, as a result thereof. Any entry
to the Premises obtained by LANDLORD, as provided above, shall not, under any
circumstances, be construed or deemed to be a fomible or unlawful entry into, or a detainer of,
the Premises, or an eviction of TENANT from the Premises or any portion thereof.
644418-1
13. Default. The occurrence of any one or more of the following events
shall constitute a default and breach of this Lease by TENANT:
A. Vacating or abandonment of the Premises by TENANT;
B. The failure by TENANT to make any payment of rent or any other
payment required to be made by TENANT hereunder, as and when due, where such failure
shall continue for a period of seven (7) days after mailed written notice thereof by
LANDLORD to TENANT, return receipt requested;
C. A failure by TENANT to observe or perform any of the covenants,
conditions or provisions of this Lease to be observed or performed by TENANT, other than as
described in subparagraph 13.B., above, where such failure shall continue for a period of
twenty (20) days after mailed written notice thereof by LANDLORD to TENANT, return
receipt requested; provided, however, that if the nature of the default involved does not consist
of radio interference, and is such that more than thirty (30) days are reasonably required for its
cure, then TENANT shall not be deemed to be in default if TENANT commences such cure
within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes said cure to completion;
or
D. The making by TENANT of any general assignment or general
arrangement for the benefit of creditors, or the filing by or against TENANT of a petition to
have TENANT adjudged a bankrupt, or a petition or reorganization or arrangement under any
law relating to bankruptcy (unless, in the case of a petition filed against TENANT, the same is
dismissed within sixty (60) days); or the appointment of a trustee or a receiver to take
possession of substantially all of TENANT's assets located in or about the Premises or of
TENANT's interest in this Lease, where possession is not restored to TENANT within thirty
(30) days; or the attachment, execution or other judicial seizure of substantially all of
TENANT's assets located in or about the premises or of TENANT's interest in this Lease,
where such seizure is not discharged in thirty (30) days.
14. Remedies in Default. In the event of any such material default or
breach by TENANT, LANDLORD may at any time thereafter and without notice or demand
644418-1
and, without limiting LANDLORD in the exercise of a right or remedy LANDLORD may have
by reason of such default or breach:
A. Terminate TENANT's right to possession of the Premises by any lawful
means, in which case this Lease shall terminate and TENANT shall immediately surrender
possession of the Premises to LANDLORD. In such event, LANDLORD shall be entitled to
recover fi.om TENANT all damages incurred by LANDLORD by reason of TENANT's default
including, but not limited to, the cost of recovering possession of the Premises, including
necessary renovation and alteration of the Premises, for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs,
and the amount by which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term, after the time of court
award, exceeds the amount of such rental loss for the same period that TENANT proves could
be reasonably avoided. Unpaid installments of rent or other sums shall bear interest fi.om due
date thereof at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum or at the maximum legal rate then
in effect in California, whichever is higher. In the event TENANT shall have abandoned the
Premises, LANDLORD shall have the option of (1) taking possession of the Premises and
recovering from TENANT the amount specified in this subparagraph, or (2) proceeding under
the provisions of the following subparagraphs.
B. Maintain TENANT's right to possession, in which case this Lease shall
continue in effect whether or not TENANT shall have abandoned the Premises. In such event,
LANDLORD shall be entitled to enforce all of LANDLORD's rights and remedies under this
Lease, including the right to recover rent as it becomes due hereunder.
C. Pursue any other remedy now or hereafter available to LANDLORD
under the laws or judicial decisions of the State of California. Furthermore, TENANT agrees
that no election by LANDLORD as to any fights or remedies available hereunder or under or
pursuant to any law or judicial decisions of the State of California shall be binding upon
LANDLORD until the time of trial of any such action or proceeding. Notwithstanding the
provisions of Section 14.A., above, if an event of default by TENANT occurs, LANDLORD
shall not have the right, prior to the termination of this Lease by a court of competent
jurisdiction, to re-enter the Premises and/or remove persons or property ther¢fi'om.
644418-1
D. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, a revocation of
any regulatory approval, shall not constitute an electable remedy for purposes of this paragraph
14.
15. Eminent Domain. If more than fifty percent (50%) of the Premises
shall be taken or appropriated by any public or quasi-public authority under the power of
eminent domain, either party hereto shall have the right, at its option, to terminate this Lease,
and LANDLORD shall be entitled to any and all income, rent, award, or any interest therein
whatsoever which may be paid or made in connection with such public or quasi-public use or
purpose, and TENANT shall have no claim against LANDLORD for the value of any
unexpired term of this Lease. If either less than or more than fifty percent (50%) of the
Premises is taken, and neither party elects to terminate as herein provided, the rental thereafter
to be paid shall be equitably reduced.
16. Offset Statement. TENANT shall, at any time and from time to time
upon not less than ten (10) days' prior written notice fi.om LANDLORD, execute, acknowledge
and deliver to LANDLORD a statement in writing (a) certifying that this Lease is unmodified
and in full force and effect or, if modified, stating the nature of such modification and
certifying that this Lease, as so modified, is in full force and effect and the date to which the
rental and other charges are paid in advance, if any, and (b) acknowledging that there are not,
to TENANT's knowledge, any uncured defaults on the part of LANDLORD hereunder, or
specifying such defaults if any are claimed. Any such statement may be relied upon by any
prospective purchaser or encumbrancer of all or any portion of which the Premises are a part.
17. Assignment and Subletting. TENANT shall not assign, sublet or
transfer this Lease or any right hereunder to any other party or parties nor shall TENANT
sublet all or any portion of the Premises without first obtaining the written consent of
LANDLORD. Any assignment or subletting of the Premises without such prior written
consent shall be void for all purposes and LANDLORD may, at its option, declare a forfeiture
of the same in any manner provided by law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, TENANT may
assign this Lease to any parent, subsidiary, party company or other company acquiring twenty-
five percent (25%) or greater interest in TENANT without LANDLORD's prior written
644418-1
consent; provided such assignee executes a document satisfactory to LANDLORD evidencing
assignee's consent to be bound by all terms of this Lease. Tenant shall have the right to sublet
all or a portion of its monopine to any third-party wireless communication provider ("Third
Partf'), upon Landlord's prior written approval, which includes all plans and specifications.
Such Third Party provider shall first look to the Landlord for its ground space requirements. If
additional ground space is not available from the Landlord, Tenant shall have the right to
sublet a portion of the Premises to such Third Party. LANDLORD shall be entitled to increase
rent payable to LANDLORD in an amount determined by the parties to be fair and equitable,
but in no case greater than 30% of the current rent.
18. Attorneys' Fees. In the event that any action or proceeding is brought
by either party to enfome any term or provision of this Lease, the prevailing party shall recover
its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred with respect thereto.
19. Fixtures. All trade fixtures and/or temporary facilities installed in or on
the Premises by TENANT may be removed by TENANT at any time during the term of this
Lease so long as the same may be removed without permanent damage to the Premises.
TENANT shall repair all damage which may result therefi'om to the reasonable satisfaction of
LANDLORD.
20. Indemnification. TENANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold LANDLORD and
its elected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from all claims and
liabilities for damage to persons or property arising directly by reason of TENANT's
negligence or TENANT's acts or omissions or those of TENANT's employees, agents, guests
or invitees in connection with TENANT's use and occupancy of the Premises, except to the
extent caused by Landlord or its employees or agents..
21. Insurance.
A. Fire and Extended Coverage - TENANT's Duty to Keep Improvements
Insured. Throughout the term hereof, at TENANT's sole cost and
expense, TENANT shall keep or cause to be kept insured, all improvements located On or
appurtenant to the Premises against loss or damage by fire and such other risks as are now or
hereafter included in an extended coverage endorsement in common use for such structures,
644418-1
including vandalism and malicious mischief. The amount of insurance' shall be the then
replacement cost, excluding costs of replacing excavations and foundations but without
deduction for depreciation (herein called "full insurable value"). LANDLORD shall not carry
any insurance the effect of which would be to reduce the protection or payment to TENANT
under any insurance that this Lease obligates TENANT to carry. If any dispute as to whether
the amount of insurance complies with the above cannot be resolved by agreement,
LANDLORD may, not more than once every three (3) months, request the carrier of the
insurance then in fome to determine the full insurable value as defined in this provision, and
the resulting determination shall be conclusive between parties for the purposes of this
paragraph. TENANT shall include the holder of any mortgage on the Lease as a loss payee to
the extent of that mortgage interest.
B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Throughout the term hereof,
at TENANT's sole cost and expense, TENANT shall keep or cause to be kept in full force and
effect, for the mutual benefit of TENANT, and LANDLORD as an additional insured,
commercial general liability insurance against claims and liability for personal injury, death, or
property damage arising fi.om the use, occupancy, disuse, or condition of the Premises,
improvements, or adjoining areas or ways, providing protection of at least Two Million Dollars
($2,000,000.00) per occurrence for bodily injury or death, and at least Five Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($500,000.00) for property damage. Any policies containing an annual general
aggregate shall be subject to LANDLORD's prior approval.
C. Policy Form, Contents and Insurer. All insurance required by express
provision of this Lease shall be carded only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do
business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII. All
such policies shall contain language to the effect that: (1) the policies are primary and
noncontributing with any insurance that may be carded by LANDLORD; (2) they cannot be
canceled or materially altered except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to
LANDLORD; (3) the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, and each of CITY's elected
officials, officers and employees are additional insureds; (4) any failure by TENANT to
comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall
644418-1
not affect the required coverage; and (5) the required insurance applies separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability. TENANT shall furnish LANDLORD with copies of all certificates and
endorsements evidencing the insurance. TENANT may effect for its own account any
insurance not required under this Lease.
D. Failure to Maintain Insurance; Proof of Compliance. TENANT shall
deliver to LANDLORD, in the maimer required for notices, copies of endorsements to ail
insurance policies required by this Lease, within the following time limits: (1) For insurance
required at the commencement of this Lease, within ten (10) days after execution of this Lease
and prior to TENANT's occupancy of the Premises; (2) For insurance becoming required at a
later date, at least ten (10) days before that requirement takes effect, or as soon thereafter as the
requirement, if new, takes effect; (3) For any renewal or replacement of a policy already in
existence, prior to expiration or other termination of the existing policy.
If TENANT fails or refuses to procure or maintain insurance as required by this
Lease, or fails or refuses to furnish LANDLORD with required proof that the insurance has
been procured and is in full force and paid for, LANDLORD shall have the right, at
LANDLORD's election and on five (5) days' notice, to procure and maintain such insurance.
The premiums paid by LANDLORD shall be treated as added rent due from TENANT with
interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year or the maximum allowable legal rate in
effect in the State of California on the date when the premium is paid, whichever is higher, to
be paid on the first day of the month following the date on which the premium was paid.
LANDLORD shall give TENANT prompt notice and provide TENANT with a certificate of
insurance and agent's invoice evidencing payment of such premiums, stating the amounts paid
and the names of the insurer or insurers, and interest shall mn from the effective date of
coverage.
22. Authority of Parties. Each individual executing this Lease on behalf of
each party represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to execute and deliver this
Lease on behalf of such party and that this Lease is binding upon such party in accordance with
its terms.
644418-1
23. Waiver. The waiver by either party of any term, covenant or condition
herein contained shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant or condition on any
subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition herein contained. The
subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by LANDLORD shall not be deemed to be a waiver
of any preceding breach by TENANT of any term, covenant or condition of this Lease, other
than the failure of the TENANT to pay the particular rental so accepted, regardless of
LANDLORD's knowledge of such preceding breach at the time of acceptance of such rent.
24. Time. Time is of the essence of this Lease and each and all of its
provisions in which performance is a factor.
25. Late Charges. TENANT hereby acknowledges that late payment by
TENANT to LANDLORD of rent or other sums due hereunder will cause LANDLORD to
incur costs not contemPlated by this Lease, the exact amount of which will be extremely
difficult to ascertain. Such costs include, but are not limited to, processing and accounting
charges. Accordingly, if any installment of rent or of a sum due from TENANT shall not be
received by LANDLORD or LANDLORD's designee within ten (10) days after written notice
that said amount is past due, then TENANT shall pay to LANDLORD a late charge equal to
ten percent (10%) of such overdue amount. The parties hereby agree that such late charges
represent a fair and reasonable estimate of the cost that LANDLORD will incur by reason of
the late payment by TENANT. Acceptance of such late charges by LANDLORD shall in no
event constitute a waiver of TENANT's default with respect to such overdue mount, nor
prevent LANDLORD from exercising any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder.
26. Inability to Perform. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Lease, if Landlord or Tenant is delayed or prevented from performing any act
which it is obligated to perform under this Lease for causes beyond its reasonable control
(including, without limitation, repair, restoration and/or maintenance obligations) related to
acts of God, war, governmental restrictions, or the inability to procure the necessary labor or
materials, then Landlord or Tenant's time for performance of such obligation(s) hereunder will
be reasonably extended by the period during which Landlord or Tenant was unable to perform,
and the non-performing party will have no liability to the other party (nor will either party be
644418-1
entitled to terminate this Lease or claim any abatement of rent under this Lease) on account of
any such delay.
27. Sale of Premises by LANDLORD. In the event of any sale or
conveyance of the Premises, LANDLORD shall be and hereby is entirely freed and relieved of
all liability under any and all of the covenants and obligations contained in or derived from this
Lease arising out of any act, occurrence or omission occurring after the consummation of such
sale or conveyance. The purchaser, at such sale or any subsequent sale of the Premises, or
other subsequent owner of the Premises, shall be deemed, without any further agreements
between the parties or their successors in interest or between the parties and any such
purchaser, to have assumed and agreed to carry out each and all of the covenants and
obligations of LANDLORD under this Lease.
28. Siens and Li~,hts. TENANT shall not place any sign upon the Premises
without LANDLORD's prior written consent and approval thereof unless required by law.
TENANT shall not illuminate any communications tower or antenna unless required by law or
as may be approved in writing by LANDLORD.
29. Successors. Subject to the provisions of this Lease with respect to
assignment and subletting, each and all of the covenants and conditions of this Lease shall be
binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the respective parties.
644418-1
30. Notices. Except where otherwise required herein, any notice required or
permitted under the terms of this Lease shall be deemed served when personally served on
TENANT or LANDLORD or when the same has been placed in the United States mail,
postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
Landlord: Tenant:
10500 Civic Center Drive 2729 Prospect Park Drive
P.O. Box 807 Rancho C6rdova, CA 95670
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn.: Property Manager
Tel. (909)-477-2700
Fax. (909)-477-2846
COPY TO:
AT&T Wireless
Atm.: Daniel E. Smith, Corporate Counsel
P.O. Box 6028
Cerritos, CA 90702-6028
31. Execution by LANDLORD Not a Waiver. TENANT understands and
agrees that LANDLORD, by entering into and executing this Lease, shall not have waived any
right, duty, privilege, obligation or authority vested in the City of_Rancho Cucamonga to
approve, disapprove or conditionally approve any application which TENANT may be
required to make under any laws, rules, ordinances or regulations now or hereafter in effect
which said City may be empowered to apply, including, but not limited to any use permit,
wireless permit or approval, whether similar in nature or not.
32. Entire Agreement. This Lease contains the entire agreement between
the parties. No promise, representation, warranty, or covenant not included in this Lease has
been or is relied on by either party. Each party has relied on its own examination of this Lease,
the counsel of its own advisors, and the warranties, representations, and covenants in the Lease
itself. The failure or refusal of either party to inspect the Premises or improvements, to read
the Lease or ether documents or to obtain legal or other advice relevant to this transaction
644418-1
constitutes a waiver of any objection, contention, or claim that might have been based on such
reading, inspection, or advice.
33. Applicable Law and Venue. Any action brought to enfome any
provision of this Lease shall be brought in the Superior Court of the County of San Bemardino,
and the same shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into the Lease as of the date set forth below
opposite the name of each signatory hereto.
"LANDLORD" "TENANT"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A AB Cellular LA,LLC, a
Municipal corporation Delaware limited liability company,
d/b/a, AT&T Wireless
BY:LIN Cellular Communication
Corporation, a .Cali~mia ,corporation,
its Memb~
By:
By: ~/--{~-/{ ~
Name:
Name: ~,rt I~regler
Title: Mayor Title: Program 101analter
Date:
By:
Name:
Title: City Clerk
Date:
Landlord's Address, Phone and Fax: Tenant's Address, Phone &Fax:
10500 Civic Center Drive 2729 Prospect Park Drive
P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Atm.: Lease Management Dept.
Tel: (909) 477-2700 Tel: (888) 480-3898
Fax: (909) 477-2846 Fax (916) 636-2723
Tax I.D. No: 95-3213002
644418-1
BASELINE STREET
COVERED PATIO
PLANTER
(E) PARK
BUILDING ,,~//-(E) WALK WAY
PROPOSED 12' X 20' ~1
AT&T EQUIPt,,IENT SHELTER '~-~..~A
70' ~
(~- A~NNAS PER SECTOR ~ SECTOR TOT
EXHIBIT "A" __
AT&T ~"~
TECHNICAL REQUTREME..NTS FOR THIRD p~RTY ~QJ, LO~..ATION
In order for LessOr to permit a Cartier to locate on Lessor's property or to r-~mfigure or
change frequency or operation of the Csn-ier's coramunicadons facilifics (a "Garrier Change"), both the
approvals set:forth in Sections 1 and 4 below must be obtained from Lessee, according to the following
1. The Carder shall subm/t to Lessee preliminary plans and tcclmical specifications for the
proposed fac/lily or the Carrier Change. Les.~e shall have 15 bn~ness days to respond to Certi~ in
wr/dn$ with Lessee's approval or d/sapproval of Carrier's plans and specifkm/ions.
2. ff the Carrier's plans and Specifications m'c not approved by Lessee,.thcn the' Csrrier shall
revise its plans ~md. speci/Scafions to meet the objections thereto set fo~h in ~'s writt~ dimipproval.
No construction, instaUafion, test/ag or operation of the Carrier's comm~icadons facilities shall be
permitted unless and until Lessee approves the Carder's plans and spcc/flcafions.
3. If the Csrr/er's plans and specifications m'e aPProved by Lessee, ~he Gmrier shall notify
Lcssee in writing as to thc scheddled date and thne of commencement of conslruc'don and installation
the Carr/er's ~rarowltfing/recc/ving equ/pment, or the implementsfion of ~ie Carrier Change, as the case
amy bc, no~ less than' five Irmsines~ days pr/or to such date.
4. The Camier also shall notify Lessee in writing five busine~ days prior to the Cm-ier's
pre-opem6oa Wansmit test as to the date and time such test will co~muence. The pre-opr~Jon Wansmi!
t~ shall, be condu~,ed jointly by L~s~ ~md the Cmrier and shall
(a) ' The signal ~r~-~ii levels a~ the outpm after the fi~l ~lter stye on the Cmier's mmsmit
linc with all ~ransmiue~ keyed up at maximum power,
Co) Antenna isolation between the output o£the/~nal ~lter stsge on the Carrier's ~ransmi! line
and input Uuc to Lessee's 15rst receive ~lter in thc ba.~ station in Lessee's frequency bsad of operm/on;
(c) The combinmion of (i) worst case level memsured om of the Carrier's ~ap~mi~ line added
~o (i/) worst casc ~ntenn~_ isolation. Such value ~h~]! be no greater than -ll4dl~n in Lesseg's Federal
COIllllau/lic~o/ls CovnmlqSion receive and transmit bands of operation. If Lessee determines th~ it is
experiencing/~terference, Lessee shall notify ~he Gan-itt to immedialcly cease the pre-oper~on or pre-
C~rrier Change Iransmit ~es~ and the Carrier shall immediately e,-a~c such ~ The~mflgr, ~ shall
have two business days w submit to thc Carrier Lessee's wriuea approval, disapproval or conditional
approval of thc Csn, ier's int~mded equipment installation or Cartier Ch~mEc.
It shall be the Cam-ier's responsibility to ensure that proper ~]tering md isola'don arc in plas~ for
the pre-operal/on or p~-Carrler Change trap,:mit test and operation of the Carrier's antenna system. Any
cbnnae to the Carrier's approved ante/ma pdpe m~d location sad/or change in hm~mirter types and power
output shal~ be requ/rcd Io follow each o£the stgps set forth in Sectio/ls 1 sm] 4 ofthis.,Patachmont 3.
Lessee may condition its approval of a collocating Can'ier's plans and specifica~ons and/or
equipment install~ioas on such Garfier paying to Leasec an equitable share of the costs Lessee incurs to
design, permit, construct, in.~'~!!, maintain and replace any Common Facilities. For this. purpose,
"Co,,.,,on Facilities" me~s any equipment, facilities, slroeturcs and improvements Les.s~ ins*altA ar the
Premises or Lessor's Proper~y which thc coUocafing Carrier will use or benefit from, such as bat no~
limi!ed to screening, condui~ ~md .dmil~r facilities.
A~fAC~NT
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Cellsit~: D12 lA - 2G
AT&T Wireless County: San Bemardino
-- 2729 Prospect Park Drive -' State: California
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Atto: Property Management
APN# 207-031-33
-Space above this line for County Recorder
MEMORANDUM OF LEASE
Tiffs Memorandum of Lease reaffirms and memorializes a Lease Agreement dated ,2002 (the "Agreement")
betweenCitg of Rancho Cucamonga, a munici al co orafio having an office at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA ("Landlord"), and AB CELLULAR LA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b/a/AT&T
WIRELESS, having an office at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 ("Tenant").
Landlord is the owner of that certain plot, parcel or tx, act of land, together with all rights and privileges arising in
connection therewith, having a street address of 748,4 Vineyard Ave.. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, with APN# 207-
031-33, being more fully describad on Exhibit A.
Landlord has leased to Tenant and Tenant has accepted and leased f~om Landlord that portion of the Property
described on Exhibit B (the "Premises"), together with all rights, privileges, buildings, structures, other improvements,
aecass, easements and rights of way now located or hereafter to be constructed on or in relation to the Premises.
The Premises are leased for an itfitial term of ten (10) years commencing upon the date Tenant begins construction
of the Communication Facility ("Commencement Date") and ending on the last day of the month in which the tenth ( 109)
anniversary of the Commencement Date occurs, unless ember terminated for any reason whatsoever provided in the
Agreement. Tenant has the option of extending automatically the lease term for four (4) additional successive periods of
five (5) years each (the "Extension Term(s)) unless the Extension Temffa) are canceled by g/ring notice to the Landlord at
least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the then-current Term of Tenant's intention not to renew the Agreement for
the next sueceeaing Extension Term.
This Memorandum of Lease further incorporates all the other terms and conditions which bind and inure to the
benefit of Landlerd and Tenant, and their respective successors and assigns, in the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have exec_uted, or have caused this Memorandum of Lea~e to be properly executed,
by thair duly authorized agents or officers, all as of the day and year first above written~
LANDLORD
City of~aneho Cucamonea. a municipal corporation
By:.
Print Name:
Its:
print Name:
Its:
Federal Tax lDO:
TENANT"
AB Cellular LA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
d/b/a AT&T Wireless
BY: LIN Cellular Communicatiom Corporation, a California
Corporation, its Member
By:
Print Name:
Its:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF )
On , before me, / , personally appeared
, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within ins~Iument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacityOes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity
upon behalf of which the per~n($) acted, executed the insteument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Signature of Notary Public)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF .)
On , before me, , personally appea~d
, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity0es), and that by his&er/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity
upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official scsi.
(Signature of Notary Public)
/-5/
E~x~4mIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF Tlt~ PROPERTY
The Property of which the Premises are a part is descffbcd as follows:
Stxeet Address 7484 Vine ard Ave.
City, Stat~ Zip Rancho Cucamon~a. CA
APN: 207~031-33
All that real property located in the State of California, County of San Bernardino described as follows: (see attached)
· · YOUR REFERENCE: D121A/RED HILL PARK ORDER NO.: 1501285-15
EXHIBIT ."A"
THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND BEING DESIGNATED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 0207-031-33, BEING A PORTION OF SAID LAND, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
A PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, OF..CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT, SUBDIVISION C,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNI~ AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21,
PAGE 67 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,. MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LO'i;-4~ SAID POINT BEING DISTANT ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE, EAST, 51.14 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, SAID
POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT
RECORDED N BOOK4229 PAGE 399 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE ALONG' THE BOUN_DARY OF SAID PARCEL, NORTH 53~. 30' ~4" EAST,..118.19 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68° 02' EAST, 251.S9 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18' 38' 38" EAST, 522.94 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4,
SAID POINT BEING DISTANT ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, EAST 622.28 FEET FROM THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, EAST, TO THE SouTHWEst CORNER OF THE EAST 1/2 OF
SAID LOT 3;
THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 2,
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST 1/2 OF LOT 2;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, WEST, 90.71 FEET TO THE SOuTHERLY
TERMINUS OF THAT WESTERLY LINE DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT RECORDED IN SAID BOOK
9486, PAGE 2045, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 0° 10' 39" EAST, 319.51 FEET TO A POINT BEING 340.00 FEET
SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1,
T~H,E, NCE EAST 252.00 FEET pARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1, THENCE NORTH 00° 1'0'
39 EAST 340.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT I BEING 30 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF BASELINE ROAD,
: ~ -. ' THENCE EAST'583:24 FEET ALONG SAiD NORTH' LINETO THE INTERSECTION THEREOF WITH '
THE WEST LINE OF VINEYARD AVENUE (40.00 FEET .WIDE AS SHOWN ON' SAID MAP OF
SUBDIVISION C, CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT);
THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 2,540 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS DISTANT
'NORTH, 100 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE WEST, ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, 860.00
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70° 20' 14" WEST, 297.19 FEET, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE
WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4, 185.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENTS RECORDED IN BOOK
8475 PAGE. 666 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
ALSO EXCEPTING ANY PORTION LYING wITHIN THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 9486 PAGE 2047, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
SAID LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS PURSUANT TO CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/LLA NO. 214,
RECORDED FEBRUARY 12, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86~337077, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
Page 3
/$3
EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTION OF pREMISES Page .. of
to the Agreement dated __, 200.._, by and between City of Rancho Cucamonoa. a municipal
corpomton, as Landlord, and AB Cellular LA,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b/a AT&T WIRELESS, as
Tenant.
The Premises are described and/or depicted as follows: (See attached dravAngs)
4
BASELINE STREET
COVERED PATIO --'
PLANTER
(E) PARK
PROPOSED 12' X 20'
AT&T EQUIPMENT SHELTER ~'""~S~CTo~A
70' ~
(E) PARKING
·
ANTENNAS PER SECTOR 3 SECTOR TOTAL
R a N C H O C U C a M O N G A
ENGINI~ERING DEPARTMENT
StaffR
DATE: August 21, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Enginee~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techr?~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE FY 2000/2001 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-OVERLAY,
CONTRACT NO. 01-073 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE
$19,074.29 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11823035650/1022182-0 FROM AB 2928 TRAFFIC
CONGESTION RELIEF FUND BALANCE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND
AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND
APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $572,432.80
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the FY 2000/2001 Local Street Rehabilitation-
Overlay, Contract No. 01-073, as complete, approval to appropriate $19,074.29 to A~,ount No.
11823035650/1022182-0 from AB Traffic Congestion Relief fund balance, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond
for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $509,969.64
six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the
release of the retention in the amount of $56,043.28, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the
final contract amount of $572,432.80.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $572,432.80, which included one contract change order resulting in a change in
the original contract amount of 12.25%. The original amount approved by Council was $560,966.93
($509,969.94 plus 10%).
Respegtful~y submitted,
W,liam
City Engrheer
RESOLUTION NO. O~.-4~)~ '~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
FY 2000/2001 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-
OVERLAY, CONTRACT NO. 01-073 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the FY 2000/2001 Local Street Rehabilitation-Overlay,
Contract No. 01-073, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
/57
LOCATION MAP
UPLAND
LEGENDS:
$?Rgg? FOR P~HAB. (A.C. OVERLAY)
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FY 2000~0! 'PAVEMENT REHABILITATION.
k.C. OVERLAY ~'~'~/5
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Sti f Report
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP·, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJEC'r: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - DRC2002-00321- OLTMAN'S
INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to amend the circulation within the
Industrial Development District, Subareas 12 and 13, to eliminate the
portion of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith
Avenue, submitted by Oltman's Investment Company - APN: 229-263-68.
Related Files: Development Review DRC2001-00718. Staff has prepared
a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration·
RECOMMENDATION:
On July 10, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Development
Code Amendment No. DRC2002-00321 and recommended adoption of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration, which requires that staff or an appropriate specialist monitor and
· approve specific mitigation activities prior to the development continuing.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Description of Proiect: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 2001-
00718 - Bradshaw III Storaqe and Distribution Center- The proposed project is
located on the east side of Buffalo Avenue, north of 4th Street and west of the
current terminus of Charles Smith Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subareas
12 and 13) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The project is currently under
review by staff for the construction of a new 454,087 square foot industrial building
on 23.91 acres of vacant land. Bradshaw International, the identified tenant of the
facility, has completed and is operating two similar facilities on parcels immediately
north of the proposed site. Use of the facility will be consistent with permitted uses
set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea
12 -Industrial Park and Subarea 13 -General Industrial.
Before the proposed project can be processed, the Development Code, Chapter
17.30 Industrial Area Districts, needs to be amended and approved by City Council
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. DRC2002-00321
August 21, 2002
Page 2
to delete the portion of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue.
B. Surroundinq Land Uses and Setting: The site is located on the east side of Buffalo
Avenue. The west side of Buffalo Avenue, at this location, is currently vacant.
West of the vacant land are multi-tenant industrial buildings. To the north, two
General Industrial storage and distribution buildings immediately border the site,
then San Marino Drive to the north of those buildings. The site is bordered on the
south by Costco Wholesale, then 4th Street and across 4th Street the City of
Ontario (Ontario Mills). East of the site, on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue
is currently vacant land and east of the vacant land is the Interstate15 Freeway.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The applicant completed Initial Study, Part I and staff completed Part I1. A Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by RBF Consulting to determine whether the
project (DRC2001-00718) will cause increases in vehicle trips in excess of projections
for the adopted land use. The TIA concluded that the project would not create any
significant traffic congestion at the study intersections. On July 10, 2002, the Planning
Commission found that there was no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment. The Planning Commission further found that
the Negative Declaration had been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon these and other findings, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of Development Code Amendment DRC 2002-
00321.
BACKGROUND AND CONCLUSION:
On July 14, 1997, Pamel Map 15012 was recorded with the County. The current
development review project is situated on Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map. The Parcel Map
contained an improvement certificate and this certificate required that specific
improvements be conditioned and completed with the development of certain parcels.
One such condition attached to Parcel 3 states the following:
"East-West connector Street (Mission Park Drive) between Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue, across Parcel 3, to be dedicated and installed with further development
of Parcel 3, consistent with the industrial area specific plan, or any amendment thereto."
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by RBF Consulting, dated July 25, 2001, was
submitted with the Development Review submittal (DRC2001-00718). The TIA analysis
determined the potential for circulation impacts resulting from the elimination of the
Mission Park Drive extension to Charles Smith Avenue. The analysis considered
impacts of the proposed project on existing conditions, as well as on conditions in the
year 2020 at the build-out of the General Plan circulation system without the Mission
Park Drive extension. The analysis examined evening peak levels of service for
existing conditions, existing plus project, Year 2020 and Year 2020 plus project
conditions for the following intersections: 4th Street/Buffalo Avenue, Buffalo
Avenue/Mission Park Drive, Buffalo Avenue/San Marino Drive, San Marino
166
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. DRC2002-00321
August 21, 2002
Page 3
Drive/Charles Smith Avenue. The TIA concluded that the project would not create any
significant impacts at any of these previously listed intersections.
RBF Consulting concluded (in their TIA) that the. .. "Analysis of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan extension of Mission Park Drive showed that inclusion of the extension will
neither significantly improve nor degrade the traffic flow through study intersections.
The nature of this project and analysis of the 'with extension' alternative show that the
extension is not needed, and therefore not recommended."
The City Traffic Engineer concurs with the conclusion of the RBF Consulting TIA,
specifically that the deletion of the extension of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo
Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue will not have any significant impact on the level of
service of the street system in the vicinity of the project. However, since there were two
letters of objection from businesses on Charles Smith Avenue, the Traffic Engineer
asked that the RBF Consulting study address the impact that loss of this point of access
will have on businesses in the project area. RBF Consulting amended their TIA to
provide an analysis and conclusion regarding the several businesses that exist near the
proposed project site and who also gain access via Charles Smith Avenue and San
Marino Drive. As discussed in the amended TIA, RBF Consulting concluded, ./!there
are no forecast impacts associated with the elimination of the Mission Park Ddve
extension to traffic operations, project access or access to existing businesses." If the
amendment is approved, Charles Smith Avenue will remain a cul-de-sac extending
approximately 600 feet south of San Marino Drive.
" OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT:
Cardlock Fuels is the owner and operator of a fueling facility located on the east side of
Charles Smith Avenue about 750 feet north of the proposed Oltman's project and 200
feet north of San Marino Street. Eagle Properties is currently processing a development
review (DRC2002-00116) for a 54,450 square foot, two-story building on 1.25 acres of
land. This property is located along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue and
immediately north of the Cardlock Fuels site (approximately 1000 feet from the
proposed Oltman's development).
Both Cardlock Fuels and Eagle Properties have submitted written correspondence
opposing the processing of this development code amendment. Cardlock Fuels is
concerned that their fuel sale projections will be adversely impacted if the connector
street is not installed. A Cardlock Fuels representative objected to the proposed
amendment during the Planning Commission meeting of July 10, 2002. He stated that
the elimination of this additional street access would adversely impact their sales.
Eagle Properties, in their correspondence, called attention to the improvement
certificate on PM 15012 and its requirement for constructing the connector street.
Without stating a specific reason, Eagle Properties opposed the elimination of the
connector street between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue. Both Cardlock
Fuels and Eagle Properties were sent mailing notices informing them that the
amendment was going before the City Council on August 21, 2002.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. DRC2002-00321
August 21, 2002
Page 4
A third party, Laird Properties, located to the east of the Oltman's project at the
cul-de-sac terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, originally voiced an objection to the
amendment. Laird Properties has more recently reversed their objection. Through their
consultant, Charles Joseph Associates, Laird notified the City in written correspondence
that they no longer have any concerns with or objections to the deletion of Mission Park
Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue.
CORRESPONDENCE:
These items have been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper. The property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners
within 300 feet of the property site. Notices were also sent to two property owners
beyond 300 feet of the project who had submitted letters to the City objecting to the
elimination of the Mission Park Drive extension.
ACTION:
If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation and staffs
analysis, and believes the proposed land use is preferable to existing Development
Code requirements, then it would be appropriate for the City Council to approve
Development Code Amendment No. DRC2002-00321 through adoption of the attached
resolution and introduction of attached ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Wil~arr~/J. O'Neil
City'Engineer
WJO:MNB:sc
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Planning Commission Resolution No. 02-65
Planning Commission Staff Report July 10, 2002
Planning Commission Minutes July 10,.2002
Planning Commission Minutes May 22, 2002
Letters: Cardlock Fuels, Eagle Properties, Charles Joseph Associates
Resolution
Ordinance/with attachment
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321, A
REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREAS 12 AND 13, TO ELIMINATE A
PORTION OF MISSION PARK DRIVE BETWEEN BUFFALO AVENUE
AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 209-263-68
A. Recitals.
1. H.P.A., Inc./Oltmans Investment Company filed for Development Code
Amendment No. DRC2002-00321, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the Subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said
headng on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the
above-referenced public headng on July 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the
adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the
above-referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission thereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with
the General Plan and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-65
DRC2002-00321 - H.P.A., INC.
July 10, 2002
Page 2
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the
Development Code; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaretion, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental
assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends
adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows; In considering the record as a
whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence
that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in
the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No.
DRC2002-00321 by adoption of this resolution and the attached Exhibits "A" and "B."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 2002.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-65
DRC2002-00321 - H.P.A., INC.
July 10, 2002
Page 3
ATTEST: ~ ~
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 2002, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEVVART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080
FIGURE 17.30.080-N
Revised 4111§2
tVXl5 $10~J -
'"
I::'OFtTION
OF 5TRF_.ET
BE
£L1/fllk/ATED
~'..1
Note: P~col ~os ~d ~t c~s · ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ may be
are S~wn as a~ximafio~ only. .ad~d over ~ ~ ~ C~ dove~$~ ~
II
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080
FIGURE 17.30.080-O
~ 1~ ~O.W. Revised 4/1/92.
I *l~ ~O.W.
B~' OR LE~ R.O.W. ·
O 0 0 0
~ ~&~
, 'FORTION
.,.....,o. TO DE
~...,......,o. EL I~ IN ATE D
Note: Parcel lines and lot configuraUo~ are
sho~ as approximations only.
The si~s shown may not be cu~ently o~ed
nor is ~e Ioca~on site specific. The
depicUon of a site is an indi~on of a
projected ~re n~d ~at may ~ adjusted
over time as ~e Ci~ develops. 0 4~
constructed at the end of their cul-de-sac at Garcia Drive, that no parking signs be provided on
Gamia Drive and to provide a traffic signal at Garoia Ddve and Etiwanda Avenue. He noted that the
traffic engineer has indicated that a signal may be warranted in the future. He also said that the
General Plan designated this area as Medium Residential and the zoning was Low-Medium, and
therefore, for consistency, a zoning change was made and approved by the City Council.
Chairman McNiel asked if Garoia Drive will continue on into Fontana.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that it knuckles off and eventually will connect to Miller Avenue.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Louis Desmond 3536 Concourse, Director of Empire Companies, thanked staff for their help and
indicated he has read the report and concurs with staff and looks forward to the Commission's
approval.
Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Mannerino commented that it needs to be done and the project brings closure to the
"donut hole" issue.
Chairman McNiel stated that it is consistent with the development around them.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Stewart to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for
Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16347 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00340 and to issue a
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts as presented.
AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MACIAS - carded
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321 -
H.P.A. INC_/OLTMANS (BRADSHAW I11) - A request to amend the cimulation within the Industrial
Development District (Subareas 12 and 13) to eliminate a portion of Mission Park Drive between
Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 209-263-68. Related File: Development
Review DRC2001-00718. Staffhas prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts
for consideration.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer presented the staff report. He commented that letters were
received objecting to the project from some of the property owners along Charles Smith Avenue. He
noted that one of the property owners representing them has since withdrawn their objection. Mr.
Chuck Buquet has notified us that his issues of concem have been resolved.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Basil Johnson, 20 East Pamela Road, Arcadia, stated he represents the applicant. He noted that he
has spoken with the property owner to the east of the project and they have agreed not to object to
the project. He added that his company sent a letter fully explaining their need for the proposed
elimination.
Stan Keolanui, representing Cardlock Fuels, 1800 West Katella Avenue, Orange, objected to the
proposal because their customers need a choice of access to their fueling facility. He stated that the
elimination of this second access would impact their sales.
Planning Commission Minutes -11- July 10, 2002
Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing and commented on the project. He stated he did not feel
the elimination of this portion of Mission Park Ddve would impede their access in any way because
there are already several points of entry to their fueling station.
Chairman McNiel re-opened the public hearing.
Mr. Keolanui noted that at times San Madno Avenue gets stacked up with trucks and therefore this
access is needed.
Chairman McNiel closed the public headng.
Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart to adopt the resolution recommending
approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2002~00321.
AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MAClAS - c~rried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-
00443 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Affordable Housing
Incentives/Density Bonus Provisions, Chapter 17.40 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development
Code, to provide for the inclusion of density bonus incentives for the development of affordable
housing. This amendment is based on the updated General Plan approved October 17, 2001,
for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified. This project is within the scope
of that previously certified EIR and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not
already considered in that cedified EIR.
Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, gave the staff report, noting that the State requested several
revisions to the City's housing element.
Chairman McNiel asked if this is required by the State.
Mr. Grahn stated that it is.
Chairman McNiel asked if this measure provides the opportunity to meet our affordable housing
requirements mandated by the State and what does the City get for its participation or does the City
get penalized if it is not done.
Mr. Grahn stated he is unaware of anything the City receives for complying with the State mandate.
Chairman McNiel asked if we receive any financial assistance from the State for implementing the
program.
Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, stated that we do not receive any financial assistance.
Mr. Grahn explained that the program is defined by income categories. He added that it improves
the developers' opportunities and we can encourage that type of development with this program.
Chairman McNiel noted that he thought the City was already participating 'in this with our senior
housing projects (SHOD).
Mr. Grahn commented that it is different in that SHOD is specific to seniors and this program is
defined by income alone with the exception of seniors that is also age-based in addition to the
consideration of their income.
Planning Commission Minutes -12- July 10, 2002
/TD
R A N C H O C U C ^ M O N G ^
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffRe rt
DATE: July 10, 2002
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJEC'D: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT - DRC2002-00321- H.P.A., INC./BRADSHAW III - A
request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Development District,
Subarea 12 and Subarea 13, to eliminate a portion of Mission Park Drive
between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue. APN: 229-263-68.
Related File: DRC2001-00718
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Description of Related Proiect: Development Review 2001-00718 - Bradshaw III
Distribution Center - Staff is currently reviewing a proposal for the construction of
a new 454,087 square foot industrial building on 23.91 acres of vacant land
located on the east side of Buffalo Avenue, north of 4th Street and the south and
west of the current terminus of Charles Smith Avenue. The proposed facility will
be used for storage and distribution. Site development will occur in one phase.
Bradshaw International, the identified tenant of the facility, has completed and is
operating two facilities similar to this on parcels immediately north of the proposed
site. Use of the facility will be consistent with permitted uses set forth in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 12, Industrial Park and
Subarea 13, General Industrial.
Before the proposed project can be processed, the Development Code, Chapter
17.30 Industrial Area Districts, needs to be amended to delete the proposed
continuation of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith
Avenue.
B. Surroundin.q Land Uses and Settin.q: The site is located on the east side of Buffalo
Avenue. The west side of Buffalo Avenue, at this location, is currently vacant:
West of the vacant land are multi4enant industrial buildings. To the north, two
General Industrial storage and distribution buildings immediately border the site,
ITEM "H"
.,.. , · 171
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00321 - H.P.A., INC./BRADSHAW III
July 10, 2002
Page 2
then San Marino Drive to the north of those buildings. The Site is bordered on the
south by Costco Wholesale, then 4th Street and across 4th Street the City of
Ontario (Ontario Mills). East of the site, on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue
is currently vacant land and east of the vacant land is the Interstate15 Freeway.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The applicant completed Initial Study, Part I and staff completed Part II. A Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by RBF Consulting to determine whether the
project (DRC2001-00718) will cause increases in vehicle trips in excess of projections
for the adopted land use. The TIA concluded that the project wouldn't create any traffic
congestion at the study intersections. The TIA analysis found no impacts that might
require mitigation measures for additional street or traffic improvements. Therefore,
issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
BACKGROUND AND CONCLUSION
On July 14, 1997, Parcel Map 15012 was recorded with the County. The current
development review project is situated on Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map. The Parcel Map
contained an improvement certificate and this certificate required that specific
improvements be conditioned and completed with the development of certain parcels.
One such condition attached to Parcel 3 states the following:
East-West connector Street (Mission Park Drive) between Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue, across Parcel 3, to be dedicated and installed with further development
of Parcel 3, consistent with the industrial area specific plan, or any amendment thereto.
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by RBF Consulting, dated July 25, 2001, was
submitted with the Development Review submittal (DRC2001-00718). The TIA analysis
determined the potential for circulation impacts resulting from the elimination of the
Mission Park Drive extension to Charles Smith Avenue. The analysis considered
impacts of the proposed project on existing conditions, as well as on conditions in the
year 2020 at the build-out of the General Plan circulation system without the Mission
Park Drive extension. The analysis examined evening peak levels of service for
existing conditions, existing plus project, Year 2020 and Year 2020 plus project
conditions for the following intersections: 4th StreetJBuffalo Avenue, Buffalo
Avenue/Mission Park Drive, Buffalo Avenue/San Marino Drive, San Marino
Drive/Charles Smith Avenue. The TIA concluded that the project would not create any
significant impacts at any of these previously listed intersections.
RBF Consulting concluded that the..."Analysis of the Industrial Area Specific Plan
extension of Mission Park Drive showed that inclusion of the extension will neither
significantly improve nor degrade the traffic flow through study intersections. The
nature of this project and analysis of the with extension alternative show that the
extension is not needed, and therefore not recommended."
' 172-
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00321 - H.P.A., INC./BRADSHAW 111
July 10, 2002
Page 3
The City Traffic Engineer concurs with the conclusion of the RBF Consulting TIA,
specifically that the deletion of the extension of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo
Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue will not have any significant impact on the level of
service of the street system in the vicinity of the project. However, since there were two
letters of objection from businesses on Charles Smith Avenue, the Traffic Engineer
asked that the RBF Consulting study address the impact that loss of this point of access
will have on businesses in the project area. RBF Consulting amended their TIA to
provide an analysis and conclusion regarding the several businesses that exist near the
proposed project site and who also gain access via Charles Smith Avenue and San
Marine Drive. As discussed in the amended TIA, RBF Consulting concluded ....there
are no forecast impacts associated with the elimination of the Mission Park D6ve
extension to traffic operations, project access or access to existing businesses. If the
amendment is approved, Charles Smith Avenue will remain a cul-de-sac extending.
approximately 600 feet south of San Marine Drive.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Development
Code Amendment DRC2002-00321 through adoption of the attached Resolution of
approval with issuance of a negative declaration. This report including all attached
items, with Planning Commission recommendation, will be forwarded to the City Council
for final action.
Respectfully submitted,
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ:MNB:sc
Attachments:Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A")
Existing Street Right-of-Way
Figure 17.30.080-N and Figure 17.30.080-O
Aerial Photo
Site Plan
Objection Letters
Director's Report - PC Minutes
Planning Commission Staff Report, May 22, 2002
Initial Study Part 1, Part2
Resolution
,... ,.. -- /73
VICINITY MAP
· CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
N
.. , Rq
Existing Street Right-of-Way
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080
FIGURE 17.30.080-N
· Revised
· CIRCULATION : TRAIL~/ROUTES
~ '120' R.O~-' 0 0 0 O' Pedestrian ,~-,~- C~eks & Chamleis"
~ 'loo"R.~w.: · · · · ~yo~e ..
, 88' ar less. R.O.W.. [~: Re~oaal : 9ak1 :'
· Multi-Use
I ! Bridge ' ~ ' Special Sl~e.. recaps/.
' ' ' ' ~ ~g I I,,
,-
0 400~ 800] ~1600' · 1Thesltesshow~l~r. aynotbeC~.owrled~ori~the . .
· ' - location site spe~:~.The depis~on of e.slte is an
Note: Parcel ~nes and lot configurations; .ind'~a~ of a iwoje~'ted f~ture need that may be
are sho~n as ap.plax!marion only. .adjustg~ ~ver time as l~e City devel~p~ ,
17.30-98 6/99
Exhibit "C"
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30. 080
FIGURE 17.30.080-O
~ 12~ ~O.W. Revised 411/92 '-
~ le~ P.o.w.
~ .~ OR ~ I~o.w. -
~s~
Oooo ~
PARK
FIRE STATION
SHERIFF STATION
sho~ as app~ximations only.
1 The si' sh°wn may "°t ~ cu~n"Y °--e" ~~TiO~
nor is ~e Io~fiofl si~ specific. ~e
depiction of a si~ is an indi~fion of a ~
projected ~m n~d ~at may be adjus~d o a~ ~0~ ~
over time as ~e C~ develops.
17,30-101 6/99
/77
_~,' ' ~J IIIll't/lllllllllllli[llllll---:" SL~J.l, tl]ll~'
~ I1~ ~ =-~ .. , . ~--,,~/,. ~1~
I1~ ~ ~ ~ ......... ~ ..... ~-~ - " V e
..~ i~',', ~ : : :!.!: , ~ , , , ~ ~ .l~x, , ~/ .'~~-"~.------
I~1 I~1~ ~t ~-k~~', I-~~--,~/~ '~"= ....
~/~t,~:~ ~, VT;W-.i -r i-T-M-T~ ~ ~~'~J- . - .;~ ~
~ . ·
I ~ T .,
~ ~ ~,~ .,,,,u_ ,, / h/g'~ =,=~
'~, r,[, , . ~2 " '
I1~?r " ' '= ~.,~r~ ~ =~--"""~
--'~--- ~
~. ~~ BRADSHA. PHASEIII
_. ~ 0 hill plnoke~ srchlteo~ In~
Project Silo Plan
CABDLOCK FUEL ,:o, Customer Serv,
r.o. 8ox 7003 ~ Call 800-441-121
Lancaster, CA 93539-7003 ~
May 7, 2OO2 t k'{ 0
Mr. Brad Buller
City of Rancho Cucemonga
' Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Re: 9291 Charles Smith Avenue, Rancho Cucemonga
Dear Mr. Bullet:
The undersigned is General Counsel for Cardlock Fuels System, Inc. In May 1999,
Cardlock Fuels constructed a tueling facility at 9291 Charles Smith Avenue. We built this facility,
after an extensive marketing survey, based on the future projection that an access roadway
would be built, in the not to distant future, from Buffalo Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue, In an
east to west direction. This additional roadway would offer our customers more selective access
to the Cardlock facility. I atfach'fo~ you a copy of the parcel map Showing the proposed road in
Ine improvement CertifiCate at page 2. We relied upon this statement in the parcel map.
Cerdlock Fuels has discovered that the developer of the parcel has filed a 'Development
Code Amendment,' with the Planning Department, on April 25, 2002. The developer is
requesting to delete this future roadway. This action, if approved by the Planning Commission
and the City Council. will probably have a direct impact on Cerdlock Fuels' projection of
increasing customers and sales. This action would be detrimental to Cardlock.
Therefore, Cardlock Fuels is sending you this letter voicing our concerns on this matter,
and we are protesting the developer's, 'Development Code Amendment,' requesting the deletion
of this future roadway. Cardlock Fuels is not in favor of this aolion.
Should you have any questions, please cenfact me at (714) 516-7260.
Sincerely,
General Counsel
RWB:vf
cc: Joe O'Neil, Planning Department
De Les Holbreok, Vice President Operations
EAGLE PROPERTIES
Commercial and Industrial
Real Estate Development
1161 EAST WALNUT STREET
CARSON, CALIFORNIA 90746
(310) 537.8190 · FAX (310) 604-4880
May 6, 2002
Lariat Mc_~ pl~nnlng Commi,e, sioll
P.O. ~ 807
~o~~ ~91~9
~ ~. McN~
..... m_~-- · ~. ~ ~ ~ a ~elo~t ~o
I~d~~ ~g°~a ~zv~ ---- ~ '-~Rd~
~dm~ ~ a~d~ ~ ~-W~ ~or ~ ~ ~ ~m ~
B~o ~ ~ ~o ~ ·
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ss ~l n~3. It ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~d ~
I ~ a ~ o~ on ~l~ S~ ~d I ~ op~ ~ ~e ~o~ ~onm~t
of fhi~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Exhibit'
be dangerous. He stated they wanted the cul-de-sac to go south 900 feet but the Fire Marshal would
only allow 600 feet. He said they improved Charles Smith Avenue ';nd put in the storm drainage to
feed into the CalTrans channel under the freeway and he said they will have to improve the balance
of Chades Smith Avenue on the east side with development of the new building, whereas typically a
property owner only improves to the centeriine. He observed that Oltman's will be spending dose to
$500,000 for the storm drain system. He felt the people on the east side of the street should have
split the cost with them but they haven't and Oltman's did not ask them to; therefore, he felt the other
property ownerS are getting a free ride. He said they submitted plans to the City for initial planning
review and were given only two items tO take care of: 1) to provide a fly report and 2) conduct a
traffic study to be sure there is no over usage of any intersections. He said when the full application
was submitted, Engineering advised them they would have to amend the Code to delete the street
and Engineering staff indicated there should not be any problem because it was a street extension
that was drawn on the map many years ago and wasn't needed. He said they were so confident it
would not be a problem, that they had the design team go ahead with working drawings and design
work costing approximately $200,000 has already been done. He stated having a street along the
south end of the properly would not benefit his company at all and would probably cost at least
$800,000 to construct. He noted it would also reduce the size of their proposed 450,000 square foot
building by at least 90,000 square feet and would .not meet the needs of to the adjacent tenants to
the north. He said the tenants need the whole 450,000 square feet to combine with the other
buildings to the north to centralize their operation. He did not feel the street is a necessity.
Chairman McNiel asked the distance from San Marino Ddve to their northern property line and the
depth of their property.
Mr. Johnson estimated the distance to their northern property line to be approximately 500 feet and
the depth to be about 800 - 900 feet.
Dawn Wilson, RBF Consulting, 5050 Avenida Encinas, Garlsbad, stated they prepared the traffic
analysis. She said their main point was that in 2020, San Marino Drive will be below capacity;
therafora it was unlikely that additional roadway trips would be diverted to the Mission Park Road.
She said the analysis also showed that all the intersections will operate at acceptable levels of
service and an additional intersection would not benefit the City.
There were no additional public comments.
Chairman McNiel stated the distance from San Marino Drive to where the originally proposed street
would be approximately 850 feet. He did not think there are many streets that close together in that
area. He did not believe the deletion of this portion of Mission Park Drive would appreciably impact
any existing or future developments on Charles Smith Drive because of the close proximity of San
Marino Drive. He felt traffic would go up Buffalo Avenue from 4th Street to get there.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias, to direct staff to process an amendment to the
Development Code upon submission of an application and fees by the project developer. Motion
carded by the following vote:
AYES: MAClAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MANNERINO - carded
F. CONSIDERATION OF SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT- CHARLES JOSEPH
ASSOCIATES - A request to initiate an amendment to allow senior housing as a permitted use
within Planning Area VIII of the Empire Lakes project.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.
Planning commission Minutes -6- }--~ [ ~) May 22, 2002
AYES: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MANNERINO
ABSTAIN TOLSTOY - carded
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
E. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
initiate an amendment to delete Mission Park Ddve between Buffalo Avenue and Chades Smith
Avenue in the Industrial Park and General Industrial Districts (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively)
- APN: 209-263-68. Related File: Development Review DRC2001-00718.
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Stewart asked for clarification of the mprovement Certificate referenced in Mr.
Eagle's letter.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that when the property subdivided at the time AutoNation
was developed, no public improvements were initiated; however the street was shown on the
General Plan and on the Development Code plan and concerns were raised by property owners in
the area. He stated language was therefore added to the Improvement Certificate of the Parcel Map
indicating the street was to be constructed as provided in the Development Code or any amendment
with further development. He observed that the project applicant is therefore now asking to amend
the Development Code to delete the street, which would mean they would be developing consistent
with the Development Code but would not have to provide the street.
Chairman McNiel invited public comment.
Chuck Bouquet, Chades Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho
Cucamonga, stated he was involved at the time of the Improvement Certificate. He said he then
represented property owners on Chades Smith Avenue. He stated that early circulation plans for the
City provided for Chades smith Avenue to go down to a cul-de-sac just north of 4th Street. He
stated the properly owners were not too concerned because of that plus there was also another
street shown connecting through to Buffalo Avenue. He stated that when AutoNation came through
the City was supportive of AutoNation and allowed the cul-de-sac farther north than originally
intended and that concerned the property owners on Chades Smith Avenue leading to the addition of
the Improvement Certificate. He said Cardlock bought their property as a result of the Improvement
Certificate being placed on Parcel 3 because Cardlock's business is designed for trucks and other
commercial vehicles to come in and fuel up. He said that Oltman's was also processing a project
with two large buildings when Automation was processed. He stated he represented a client who
was losing about 300 of street frontage. He said they met with the City Engineer and negotiated the
Improvement Certificate, to require a street connection from Chades Smith Avenue through to
Buffalo Avenue. He said his clients at the time believed that a street would be constructed when
development occurred. He stated he appreciated staff's comment that the Code could be amended,
but observed his clients were not engineers and believed they would be getting a street. He
suggested that the street be moved south of the proposed building to tie into the Mission Park area
across the way and still provide the promised connection to Chades Smith Avenue. He said the
property owners on Chades Smith feel deletion of the street will leave them landlocked and the use
of their property will be inhibited and restricted.
Basil Johnson, Oltman's Construction Company, 20 East Pamela Road, Arcadia, stated that the
properties will not be landlocked. He said it was his understanding that the City abandoned the idea
of having Chades Smith Avenue tie into 4th Street because it is too close to the freeway and would
Planning Commission Minutes -5- ~.[ [ ~ May 22, 2002
THE CITY OF I'1
~^NCIIO CIJCAIqONG^
Staff IZeport
DATE: May 22, 2002
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT -.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-
A request to initiate an amendment to delete Mission Park Drive between Buffalo
Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue in the Industrial Park and General Industrial
Districts (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively) -APN: 209-263-68. Related File:
Development Review DRC2001-00718.
BACKGROUND:
On July 14, 1997, Parcel Map 15012 was approved with the condition that the east-west
collector street (Mission Park Drive) between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue be
installed across Parcel 3 with further development of Parcel 3. On November 13, 2001, Alfonso
Lopez, Hill Pinckert Architects, submitted an application (DRC2001-00718) to censtmct a
454,087 square foot industrial building that would include deletion of Mission Park Drive from
going through Parcel 3. In a letter from the Engineering Division dated December 13, 2001, the
applicant was informed that he would have to prepare and submit a focused traffic study to
identify the impacts of the deletion of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue.
ANALYSIS:
Only the Planning Commission or City Council may initiate an amendment to the text and/or
exhibits of the Development Code. In Chapter 17.30 - Industrial Districts, Mission Park Drive is
shown on the Subarea 12 and 13 site maps. Therefore, the deletion of the eastern portion of
the street requires a Development Code Amendment. The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact
Analysis (RBF Consulting dated July 25, 2001) that concluded the extension of Mission Park
Drive would neither significantly improve nor degrade the traffic flow through the area, and that
the nature of the project and analysis of the street extension of Mission Park Drive between
Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue show that the extension is not needed, and therefore
not recommended.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
May 22, 2002
Page 2
CORRESPONDENCE: To date staff has received phones calls from Stan Keolanui, a
representative for Cardlock Fuels, who owns property to the northeast of the site and Lewis
Eagle, owner of the property to the south of Cardlock Fuels. Both men called inquiring about
DRC2001-00718, and were concerned about the deletion of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo
Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue because of the permanent reduction of access to their
properties if the project is allowed to go forward. The men stated they were under the
impression that Mission Park Drive would eventually be completed with the approval of Parcel
Map 15012; therefore, they developed their properties with that assumption. Both callers made
it clear to staff that they are in opposition to the project and would like Mission Park Drive to
eventually extend through to Charles Smith Avenue. On May 7, 2002, staff received a letter
from Robed Bollar, General Counsel for Cardlock Fuels (Exhibit "E"). In the letter Mr. Bollar
expressed concerns regarding the deletion of Mission Park Drive and indicated that Cardlock
Fuels constructed the fueling facility located at 9291 Charles Smith Avenue based on the future
projection that Mission Park Drive would eventually be extended. Mr. Bollar is concerned that
the deletion of Mission Park Drive will directly impact Cardlock Fuel's customer sales. On May
9, 2002, the City also received a letter from Mr. Eagle stating his opposition to the deletion of
Mission Park Drive (Exhibit "F"). Staff believes adequate access is provided by San Marino,
which is north of, and parallel to, Mission Park Drive. San Marino is approximately 1,000 feet
closer to the above-referenced properties (Exhibit "D").
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission initiate an amendment
to delete Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue. If the
Commission approves, then the next step would be for applicant to submit the amendment
application and fees.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:WM/jc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map
Exhibit "B" Site Plan
Exhibit "C" Industrial Districts Subarea 12 and 13 Maps
Exhibit "D" Map showing property locations of people in opposition
Exhibit"E" - Cardlock Fuels correspondence dated May 7, 2002
Exhibit"F" - Eagle Properties correspondence dated May 6, 2002
LOCATION MAP
ect Site
MIS~
N
480 960 Feet ~
~ ~ - ~ r,.I.~_", r'.,'~.~_'.}'~
-- ~1~d' IIIII LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfl'l'l'II4L~III~'"" '~'~"~'~====='
, ~-,-E I- '. -!'~"!'. ~ -~ "- ' '~ ~-"*"--+ ~ - ~ , ---~--'~---~- ;~ ,.-./I
--- i~..eEi ~" ' =' ~' ~','l ;I,,'I.'1..I,,.I,,.,,,- ~'i~'i,,.i., ,,,.'..,.~. ~. ,,. ="" ' ' ,--'/ [[ JS"':-------
~ , .. j/,, - ~,-- I- J -I- --1---I--4 I - I .I. lh-l,---k---l--~ ~---- 1,:;~ i I--! I ', I
'-"-- ' ' ' ,' ' ~ , , ' ,~: , , I ~+'-~, _~
I= =~-"-i--1-1 I---i-l-i---P-t "~l--l-i'" '""" ......
~, ~E ---'-"'~- ~ -~! ~ --~.-~.----.~.,,..-~..,.~,+.__:l~--~.~-~--.--*-- ~ ~..-~-~--' -;..-.~--~,--.~.-/,,~ / ' '~"""~'~-"~'"'--
I : : ~ J 45 08 8.F, -'. .._=....,..r-.~.-~..------
?"-:'~ ~_-- , -Y-WI',, I -[-I-T-I-I-T1 -7-] --[-~'2.~~~'~"'-,,, ~- ,~-==-,.
,= = , /~' ;~ ~ - .....
,L " ...... :?
,Pi-t ~ "~ 1111111141'llllJlJ, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIJ,l,[. . gsa'"" ==-"-"~'-'-':---":=',-=-,
feb~leflon~
-- ...... "~.~ ~ 454 K INDUSTRIAL FACILITY FOR
~-~ ~'= .... = --~--~-- BRADSHAtVPHASEIII
FIGURE 2
Project Stie Plan
OLTMAN'S RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30. 080~ ....
FIGURI= ~ ?.30.080-~ ....
' Revised 41tl~
· '
· ~TJO# : TRAILS/ROUTES
~ '120' R-O,~;' 0 0 0 O' Pedestrian ~,N.-,~. Cl:e~ks & Cham~18~
~ 'lOO'.'P.o,W.:' · · · · .mc~lo
88' or leas. R.O.W.. · Regional i~rkI :'
" Multl.4Jee
RAIl; .~ERVlCE · ' ".
I I Bddge ..,=,,,=.,,,..a.,,,~ · Spec:iai $ .trRe, ta~.aPe/
. ' ' .1 : Existl~g l:
~ t.~nds~ing
:.f-++++-- ~,o~)~i! ~ · Access
·
:' l'r'~e ~ shown nmy not .be ca.rre~dly, own~l nor b the
0 40Gt 800; "1S00t
· ' Iocatlonsit~-specll~"the deplctlonofe.elte is mt
Note: Parcel lines and lot config~atlons : .i~lloa~on of a projected future need that may be
ore shown as approximation only. .ad~st~;I over tlme as t~e CRy d~vel~P. ~ ,
Exhibit ..C. /~7
Section 17.30.080
City of Rancho Cucamonga
FIGURE 17.30.080'O
120' R.O,W. Revised 411/92.
0000
~ LANDSCAF'iNG
· : POWER
PARK 1
FIRE STATIOH
SHERIFF STATION
Note: pareel lines and lot configurations are ~~~1~
shoWn as approximations only..
,Thesitesshownmaynotbecurtentiy°wned
nor is the location site specific. The
depiction of a site is an indication of a
projected future need that may be adjusted O 40~
over time as the City develops.
6~99
Map Showing Property of People in Opposition
ale Pro
Cardlock Fuel S
MISSIO
0
0 480 960 Feet
CARDLOCI[ FUEL q For Customer Service
r.o. Box 7003 Call 800-441-1215
Lancaster, CA 93539°7003 ~
May 7, 2002
Sentvi ederal Ex ress ,i~_.[;~:~J~J-~ ' '~'~ '~'~;~'~'~
Mr. Bred Buller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho C.ucamonga, CA 91729
Re: 9291 Charles Smith Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga
Dear Mr. Buller:
The undersigned is General Counsel for Cardlock Fuels System, Inc. In May 1999,
Cardlock Fuels constructed a fueling facility at 9291 Charles Smith Avenue. We built this facility,
after an extensive marketing survey, based on the future projection that an access roadway
would be built, in the not to distant future, from Buffalo Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue, in an
east to west direction. This additional roadway would offer our customers more selective access
to the Cardlock facility. I attach for you a copy of the parcel map showing the proposed read in
the Improvement Certificate at page 2. We relied upon this statement in the parcel map.
Cardlock Fuels has discovered that the developer of the parcel has filed a 'Development
Code Amendment," with the Planning Department, on April 25, 2002. The developer is
requesting to delete this future roadway. This action, if approved by the Planning Commission
and the City Council, will probably have a direct impact on Cardlock Fuels' projection of
increasing customers and sales. This action would be detrimental to Cardlock.
Therefore, Cardlock Fuels is sending you this letter voicing our concerns on this matter,
and we are protesting the developer's, "Development Code Amendment," requesting the deletion
of this future roadway. Cardlock Fuels is not in favor of this action.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 516-7260.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Bollar
General Counsel
RWB:vf
cc: Joe O'Neil, Planning Department
De Len Holbrook, Vice President Operations
EAGLE PROPERTIES C
Commercial and Industrial ' ' : · '
Real Estate Development
1161 EASTWALNUTSTREET i~14Y ]* $2002
CARSON, CALIFORNIA 90746
(310) 537-8190 · FAX (310) 604-4880
May 6, 2002
Larry McNeil, Planning Commission Member
Rancho Cucamonga planning Commission
City Hall
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729
Dear Mr. McNeil,
I understand that there is going to be a meeting May 22nd to discuss a Development Code
Amendment to abandon an East-West connector street between Charles Smith Rd and
Buffalo Street in Rancho Cucamongm
On July 8, 1997 there was an Improvement Certificate signed by Debra Adams for this
street to be added across parcel number 3. It also states, "to be dedicated and installed
with further development of parcel 3, consistent with industrial area specific plan, or any
amendment thereto."
I am a property owner on Charles Smith and I am opposed to the proposed abandonment
of this connector stxeet. I respectfully urge you to install the proposed street.
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
=~0,.~.~0~=-~0.,, (Part I - Initial Study)
The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed
project so that the City may review the project pUrsu=int fz~ City po!i¢!'e~t ordinanoes, and
guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures
to Implement CEQA. It is im~porfant that the information requested in this application be
provided in full,
~AICOMP£ETE APpLICATION$ wILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Ple~e note that It Is tbs mspon=lblllty of the applicant fo ensure
that ~he appflca~ is ~ple~ at Ihe tl~e of submittal: C~ =r.ff ~l not be available ~ pedo~ ~ ~uimd to provide missin~
i~fo~ation.
Application N~r f~ the p~je~ to ~ich ~f~ ~ pe~ains: . ,
~ame & Addm~ ~ pe~ pmpa~ng th~ f~ 8 diffe~nt tram a~m):
~elephone Num~C _ ~ -
'
InformatiOn indicated by esie~str (') Is not required of nor~conStruction CUP's Unless othenyise requested by stag.
'1) provide a full scale (B.1/2 x '1 I) copy of the USGS Otladmnt Sheet(s) which includes the project site, end indicate the
site boundaries.
2) Provide a set of c~lor photoqraphs which shew representative views ~ the ~Jto.. from the north, south, east and weal;
views into and fm'm the site tl~m Ihs primary access points which serve the site. and representative VieWs of slgnificani
feeJure$ frorn the st'~e, include e map showing location of eauh photograph.
~ Assessor's Pa..el Numt~er~ ~attach sddifi~al sheet ~ necessery); . ~
'5) Gro~s ~e Ama (ac'sq. fi_); ....
NOt Silo Area [total silo size minus efee of public streela & proposed dedications):
?i Descdbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would effeci the project site (attach eddltlonal sheet
if neaessaO,:
Include a desctlpiicn of ell permlls which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga end other governmental
age,talcs in or,er Io fully implement the project:
, n'/
"~ ' s/cai SeVin or,he site as it exists before the project i~ctudll~O information on t~ph~, s~ sta~llty, pla ts
9) Oescn~e the ph~ ~-- ~lls and mad= ~lne~e ~e~ end =Cen~c aspe~s. DescEbe a~y ex~ng ~t~ctum= on s~e
(ind~i~ e~ e~ ~ib~) and ~e u~e of the st~ms. A~a~ photo.h= ~ ~ignffica~t fea~a descff~d. Id addition.
$ite afl =oumes of In~a~ ~.e.. geol~icel a~or hyd~oglc ~di~, bioa~ a~ a~e~ical su~ey3, ~ studies):
f O) O~cd~e the knov~ =ultuml ancot hlstd~cal e~ ~the ~e. SSe eft ~e= ofl~fo~at~ ~s, published m~ end
11) Do~c~be eny n~~ ~°u~ and t~r le~l~ thet fl~w a~°ct th~ site ~al~m~' me~wey n~se' e~') ~d h~w ~he~ ~ ~fec~
2) Desc~be the proposed project tn detail, This should provide an adequate desc4~ptl~ of the si~ ~ te~s of ~liimate use wh~h
· ' ' h m em pmp~ed phases ~ de~elop~nl.
' I m ~e pms~ p~je~. Indi~te r~ t .~ ..... ~men ARach ~dditi~al ~heet(s) ~f necessa~.
Oesc~be t~e su~undi~ pmpe~ inc~di~ info~a~ ~ pla~ts and e~imals and e~y cullum, hi. to.al, ~ ~ce~
houses, sho~s,
13) Indicate tho type =f land use ~msld~Jlel, ~m~el, etc.), ~ten~tY el tend Use (~a~y. epa~nt
depa~ment atoms, erG,) and ~ca~ ~ devel~r*t (heir[ ~/ege, sel~Gh mar ya~, etc.):
f 4) ~ll the PmP~ed p~ect c~a~ge the pattem~ scale °r ~hamc~r °f the s~nding g~l eme of the p~je~t?
.... · 75) Indicate the type of $~to~t. ten~ and Iong-~en~n noise to be genem~ed, Ind~d~hg =~e and amo~nL How will the~ noise levels
e~ect adjaCen~ pmpe~les e~d o~ite u=es. ~al me~h~= ~ ~und p~ng a~ pm~se~
'I 6) IndicaJe p~poaed ~movel$ enter ~pla~ents
t7) indicateanyb~iesofwaJer(Incl~dlngd~sScWa~rsu~D~$)i~whl~hthe=Ted~'
18) Indicate ex~t~ ~ nt ~ water usage. (See Atta~meot A [~ usage estimates). ~r luffher cledficetlon, please ~tact
the Cucamonga Courtly Weter
a, Re=idential (gal~day) ~ /~ ~ak u~ (ge~ay) ,
b, Comme~ia~nd,
19) Indicate pmpoaed ~th~ of =ewage ~sal ..... 3ept~ Tank ~ Sewer. If sepEc te~k= em pmp~ed, attach
pe~ola~ te=t~, If diseaSe ~ a =a~ite~ sewage =y=tem is pmposed fnd~aie expected dmly aewa~ genemfl~: (See
A~echment A for
a. ReSMenJiel (gamey)
b. Comme~iaHnd. (gal/day~)
RE IDEN~ '
20) Num~of~Mentialunlts:
~etnched (indicate ~ge of pa~l ~ze$, minimum lot ~ze and maximum lot size:
(indicate wheti~er unit$ are rental or for sale urelts):
21) Anticipated range of aate p~fces ancYor mnt$;
Sole P~fce(s) $ to S
Rent (per reonth) $ to $
22) Spoci~ ~y unil ty~; ....
23) indicate ant[cipated hou~hold $ize by unit lype.'. ., c
2.4) Indlceto tl~e expe~led nureber of school ct~ildren who will be residing within the pm)ecL' ContaCt tho approprlale School
DistHcls as show~l in Attachment B: A
a. Elereenta~y~ t'~/,''~ , .
,....,o..,...
~)MMEL~CIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSI'ITUTIONAL PROJECT~
25) ~e~c~fbe~ype~fuse(~)~ndre~j~rfun~n($)ofcoremem~indust~y~n$~tu~i~nolu~es:
2~) Total floor area of comreercial, Indust~'~l, or i~slllulion~l uses by b/pe:
25) Number of employee$: Total;
Maximum ~hiR:
29) P~vide~makd~wn~fantic~pat~j~bc~assi~a~i~in~udi~wage~ndsa~a~n~e~as~nin~cat~fthem~e
of btm for eac~ ~a~i~cpt~n (a~ach eddlt~al sheet
30) Estimation of the n~er ~ ~em to be hired that cu~n~ reside In the City:
· 31) For commercial and tndusldM uses only, indicate the source, type ~nd emo~nl ofaifpoffution emissions. (Data .~hould ho
vetffia~ Ihrough tho SoUth Coe=t Ah'QUeli~.V Management Distill;t, at (818) $72.62~):
32) Haveihewater~sewer~m~and~dc~ntm~egencie$~ert4ng~heprq~ec~beenc~nt~cted~de~erminethe~rebi~yt~pmvide
adequate zervloa to the p~po~ed pmjact? If $o, please indicate thelr m~ponse,
33) In the known histgry r~f this property, has them been shy u~e, stet'age, or dlscha~e o[ haz a~ous an~r ioxlc mate~als?
Example~ ol haza~ous en~or Ioxic mateNals include, but am not Ilml~d to PCB's; ~dloacllve substances; pesti~des and
he.icicles; fuel~, ~1~, ~Vent3, e~d ofher flemmab~ liquids and gases. AI~ note unde~Und slom~ of any ~ ~e ebon.
Please fi=t the maledel= and desc~be t~eir u~, =tomge. anWor dis¢ha~ ~ the pmpe~, as ~E as the dates of use, if
k~o~n.
34) ~ll lhe pmposed p~ect lnv~e the ~mpo~ or lon~le~ u~, sto~ ~ dls~aM= of haza~s a,~r t~lc
malen*;ls, including bul ~ limlt~ ~o ~ examples lisl~ ~? I( ~ provide an in~en~ o[ ell s~ mefe~sls to be
used and ~posed met~ o[ disposal. The I~e~ ~ such u=es~ al~g ~*~h ~e stomgo and shipment a~as, ah~l be
s~own and lebel~ on the app~tlon plans.
t he~by cavity that tho slate~nt~ ~mished abo~ and in the atfach~ exhibits pm~nt the data end ~ mqui~d
co.ct tot ~e best ~ my kno~ed~ and belie[ I fufl~r Unde~lend ~at additional ~aEo~ may ~ mq~md ~ ~ ~ubmihed
before an e~equate evaluafion gan ~ made by lhe City ~ Rench~ Cuca~nga,
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Development Review/DRC2001-00718, and
Development Code Amendment/DRC2002-00321
2. Related Files: Preliminary Review 00-29
3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC
2001-00718 - Bradshaw III - A request to construct a 454,087 square foot industrial
building on 23.91 acres of land in the Industrial Park and General Industrial Districts
(Subarea 12 and Subarea 13, respectively), located on the east side of Buffalo Avenue,
approximately 465 feet south of San Marine Driver - APN 0229-263-68 Related Files
PR 00-29.
Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00321 -
Bradshaw III - A request to amend the circulation element within the Industrial
Development District of Subarea 12 and 13, to eliminate a portion of Mission Park Drive
between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue. APN209-263-68. Related File
DRC2001-00718.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Oltmans Investment Co.
10005 Mission Mill Road
Whittier, CA 90608
5. General Plan Designation: General IndustriaVIndustrial Park
6. Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 13)/Industrial Park (Subarea 12)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 23.91 acre site is undeveloped vacant land,
mainly vegetated with grass, small weed, and shrub species. Scattered remains of
domestic grape plants exist on the site, suggesting the site was previously used for
grape cultivation. The site slopes gently south at approximately a 1 to 1.5 percent
gradient· Household waste and small debris piles were observed throughout the site. In
addition, a sand/gravel pile, an empty wooden reel, and several empty plastic buckets
were present on the northeast side of the site. A Caltrans drainage channel exists on the
northeast side of the site. The drainage transports storm water from Charles Smith
Avenue eastward underneath Interstate 15. The site and surrounding area are located
within the General Industrial/Industrial Park district. Industrial development borders the
property to the north. A vacant lot adjacent to Interstate 15 borders the site to the east.
Charles Smith Avenue ends near the northeast side of the site. The recently completed
Costco borders the site to the south, followed by 4th Street. Buffalo Avenue borders the
site to the west, followed by industrial development.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 2
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
;I 0500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
State Water Resoumes Control Board - National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permits for storm water discharge associated with construction activity and a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
~(v') Land Use and Planning (./) Transportation/Circulation
(v~) Biological Resources ( ) Public Services
I1( ) Population and Housing (v') Utilities and Service Systems
II(v') Geological Problercs ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics
~ (v')Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
II(v') Air Quality (v') Noise ( ) Recreation
(v') Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
June17, 2002
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 4
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an
explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact,' "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant impact" answers, including a
discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (")
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ('") ( )
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) ('")
vicinity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
established community?.
Comments:
a-d) The subject site lies within an industrial zoned area, in accordance with the
Development Code, Chapter 17.30 General Industrial (Subarea 13)/Industrial Park
(Subarea 12). The project consists of developing one industrial building on the
currently undeveloped 23.91 acre lot located east of the Buffalo Avenue and
Mission Park Drive intersection. Surrounding properties include industrial buildings
north, south, and west of the property. The project's implementation causes no
conflict or disturbance to the surrounding land uses since properties are currently
developed with similar uses or are zoned industrial. The project will generate
increased emissions in the area during construction and project operations.
Section 5 - Air Quality discusses the emissions generated by the project, analysis
of impacts, and proposed mitigation measures.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
2. POPtJI.A130N I~D ~ Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ( ) ( )
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ( ) ( ) (v)
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR02001-00718 Page 5
I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
housing?
Comments:
a-b) The project consists of developing one industrial building totaling 454,087 square
feet of floor area. The project wilt employ no more than 80 people, of which
approximately 75 percent will be employed from the local area. Therefore, the
projects' development should cause no significant increase in total workers within
the area. Due to the region's housing rich situation and the projected 75 pement
locally employed workforce, the project will improve the city's job and housing
balance. The project will not result in a change in population projections.
c) The site is currently undeveloped. The surrounding land uses include only industrial
developments. During the site inspection, no residential housing units were
observed near the project site. Therefore, the project should have no impact to the
existing housing in the area.
I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pot~ u~ ~han
3, GE~ PROBLEMS- Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ('~)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) (v) ( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ) ' ( ) ('~)
d) Seiche hazards? ) ( )
e) Landslides or mudflows? ) ( ) ("~)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ) ( ) (~)
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? ) ( )
h) Expansive soils? ) ( ) ('~)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ) ( ) ('/)
Comments.~
a-b) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill
Fault (see Figure V-1 in the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan). The Red
Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 4 miles northwest of the site, and
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 6
the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies within 6.5 miles north of the site. Both these faults ara
capable of producing a moment magnitude (M,~) 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes. The San
Jacinto Fault Zone, capable of producing up to Mw 6.9 earthquakes, passes within
10 miles northeast of the site. The San Andraas fault, capable of up to M,, 8.2
earthquakes, passes within 13.5 miles to the north. These faults ara capable of
producing intense ground shaking on the subject site. Adhering to the Uniform Building
Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant.
C) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subject to ground
shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude. Additionally, liquefaction may occur
when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface. Based on ground
water depths within the area (approximately 300-350 feet below surface grade), the
potential for liquefaction within the project area is unlikely. Adhering to the City grading
standards, and the Uniform Building Code, will ensure that geologic impacts are less
than significant.
d) The site is not located near a body of water. According to Figure V-5 of the City's
General Plan, the site is not within a 100-year flood plain. An existing Caltrans
storm drain passes through the northeast side of the site, transporting storm water
from Charles Smith Avenue underneath Interstate 15. The nearest Flood Control
facilities are the Church Street basin located within 3 miles northwest of the site,
and the Day Creek channel located within ~ mile east of the site. With the existing
Caltrans storm drainage on the site, the development of the project site will .not
expose people or structures to any potential impacts.
e) The site slopes toward the south at 1 to 1.5 percent gradient. The site exists on
relatively flat area and no significant landslide and mudflow impacts exist. The
existing Caltrans storm water drainage will also help reduce any potential impacts.
f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project because the site is
currently vacant. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved
by the City Engineer.
g-h) Delhi fine sands is the main soil type present on site according to the Soil Survey of
San Bernardino County Southwestern Part, California (USDA, Soil Conservation
Service, 1980): According to the Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands
Flower-Loving Fly (GeoSciences, November 2000), the soils appear mostly sandy,
and compacted throughout the site. The site is mainly vegetated, but several areas
of unconsolidated soil are present. Delhi fine sand soil is characterized as having
very slow runoff. These soils have been used for crop irrigation, including grapes.
Their available water capacity is about 4 to 5 inches. The hazard for soil blowing is
moderate, but can be high if the soil is unprotected.
i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 7
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ('~) ( ) ( )
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) (/) ( )
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) ('")
of water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('")
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
Comments:
a/c-e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and the
building proposed on the currently vacant site. An existing Caltrans storm drain
passes through the northeast side of the site. The Part I of the Environmental
Information Form (provided by the applicant) indicated the project includes
development of an on-site storm drain connecting to the City's existing 4~h Street
storm drain. Surface storm water generated by the project will be discharged into
the Caltrans drainage to the east, Buffalo Avenue drainage on the west, and the
Fourth Street storm drain via the proposed on-site storm drain. The final drainage
plan and report must be approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The
impacts are considered less than significant with the proposed drainage
developments.
As a standard condition of project approval, the applicant must prepare a
preliminary drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed. A
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 8
final report will be required prior to issuance of grading permits or final map
recordation.
Since grading on site will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The applicant must also submit a Notice of
Intent (NOI) to the SWRCB for coverage under the state's NPDES General Permit.
The SWRCB will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMP's) during
construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or
storm water conveyance channels. BMP's would include, but are not limited to
street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or
sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation
measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion are
less than significant:
1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMP's to
be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMP's
shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the
City Engineer.
A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show
how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and site
operations. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the
Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMP's
identified in the SWPPP, submitted to the SWRCB, will make this impact less than
significant.
b) Based on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the project site is outside of the
100-year flood plain. The project includes development of an on-site storm drain
and discharging into the existing storm drains surrounding the site.
f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area
as the site is not used for groundwater recharge.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: .o~.~.~ Un~ess Th~r~
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to (~') ) ( )
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (~')
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) (-')
cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ( ) ('")
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 9
Comments:
a) The proposed industrial development will increase pollutant levels during
construction and project operations. The criteria pollutants screened for included:
reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and
particulates (PM~0). Air quality impacts caused during project development are
discussed in the Construction Emissions section, and long-term operational impacts
are discussed in the Operations Emissions section.
Construction Emissions
Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds
during grading activities for PMt0 and NOx. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~o) will
be generated. However, since there are existing industrial developments within the
vicinity of the site, and since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status
for ozone and suspended particulates (PM~0), fugitive dust will be mitigated by the
following measures:
2. The site 'shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in
accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
3. Buffalo Avenue and charles Smith Avenue shall be swept according to a
schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated
with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon
time of year of COnstruction.
4.Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes.
5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours
or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment
and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed sudaces, will
increase NOx and PM~0 levels in the area. The following mitigation measures will
ensure impacts to existing industrial development are at less than significant levels.
6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used
on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The
construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 10
9. The construction contractor shall use Iow VOC asphalt during the asphalt
paving portions of the project.
The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G
(URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The
program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. Though
not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the
effectiveness of control measures. Table 1 shows construction emission results
before and after the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Table 1
URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary
{Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOx CO PM~o
Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit.
Grading 1.33 1.33 25.86 24,57 23.05 8.80
Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.02
Mobile Equip. 4.22 4.01 47.68 45.30 - 5.98 5.68
Arch. Coatings 0.00 0.00 -
Asphalt 0.87 ,0.83 -
Totals 6.76 6.44 73.82 70.14 0.00 0.00 29.05 14.50
SCAQMD Thres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150
Significance No No No No No No No No
Operational Emissions
The project will increase NOx emission levels in the area. Since industrial
development mainly surrounds the project site, reducing the NOx emissions will
cumulatively benefit the area's air quality, The proposed project includes
development of multiple dock doors around the industrial building where trailers
would be parked, loaded/unloaded, then towed by tractor off site. A major portion of
the project related emissions will occur due to the use of tractor trailer rigs entering
and leaving the site, Trucks stationed over extended time periods during the
loading/unloading of trailers often leave their engines running to power the electrical
systems in the cab. This contributes to increased operational NOx levels. According
to the project architect, one trailer tractor (also referred to as a "yard dog") will assist
in moving trailers around the site.
In November of 2001, SCAQMD adopted Rule 1634, providing an opportunity to
generate NOx mobile source emissions reduction credits for use in RECLAIM by
using electrical power instead of keeping diesel-powered engines running at truck
stops. Abiding to this rule will help reduce NOx levels caused by diesel-powered
trucks stationed at the proposed truck stops during operations at the site. Based on
the recently adopted SCAQMD Rule 1634, mitigation measure #10 will reduce the
operational NOx emission level:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 11
10. If applicable, the project applicant will abide to SCAQMD Rule 1634 by
providing electrical power at project designated truck stop locations to
reduce NOx emissions caused by trucks stationed over extended periods
of time,
The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of
Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into
the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the industrial nature of the proposed
project, the default fleet mix and the default trip rate were modified to reflect the
results established in the Traffic Impact Analysis (RBF Consulting, 2001). Emissions
associated with these vehicle trips are listed in Table 2. The model calculated
mitigated emission values based on existing sidewalks in the project area. The NOx
emission level changes caused by mitigation measure #10 are not reflected in the
table.
Table 2
O ~erations Emissions
{Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOx CO PM~o
Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit.
Area Source 0.16 0.10 0.81 0.01 1.01 0.69 0.00 0.00
Mobile Source 24.80 24.78 27.40 27.36 171.57 171.32 · 8.38 8.37
Totals 24.96 24.88 28.21 27.37 172.58 17,2.01 8.38 8.37
SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150
Significance No No No No No No No No
b) The proposed industrial development is consistent with the surrounding areas
General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned district. Industrial development ,exists to the
north, south, and west of the project site. A vacant lot adjacent to Interstate 15
borders the project site to the east. No sensitive receptors are present in the
surrounding area.
c-d) The proposed project is the development of 23.91 acres of land into one industrial
building with loading areas consistent with the surrounding areas General Industrial/
Industrial Park zoned district. Since no sensitive receptors exist in the area, any
impacts caused by generated emissions, that could cause climatic changes or
objectionable odors, will not be significant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehi(~le trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (/) ( )
Initial Study for ' City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 12
issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Un~ess 31~an
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ) ) ('~)
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ) ('/)
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) (")
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) (v)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
Comments:
a) The proPOsed project includes the construction of one (1) industrial building with
loading areas. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (RBF Consulting, 2001) project
· generated daily trips, the ITE trip rate was modified to 1.60 trips per day per
1,000 square feet of developed area. Based on this trip rate, the proposed project
will generate 727 trips per day with 45 trips occurring during the morning peak hour
and 68 trips occurring during the afternoon peak hour. Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue provide primary access to the site. According to the Traffic Impact
Analysis completed by RBF Consulting in July 2001, the proposed project should
not cause any significant traffic issues during development or thereafter.
Forecast volumes for 2020 indicated the Buffalo Avenue/4th Street intersection is
expected to operate at an unacceptable PM peak level without the proposed
project. Recommended mitigation for this intersection includes restriping the
southbound approach to accommodate dual left turn lanes. In addition, the
Development Code (Industrial Districts Subarea 12 and 13) calls for the extension
of Mission Park Drive through the proposed project site to connect Buffalo Avenue
to Charles Smith Avenue. This street extension would prevent the development of
the proposed project as only one industrial building. The Traffic Impact Analysis
concluded that since the proposed extension of Mission Park Drive will not
significantly impact traffic in the study area, and since the proposed project will have
street access on both Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue, the proposed
street extension is not recommended. Thus, the proposed Development Code
Amendment to eliminate the extension of Mission Park Drive is supported by the
conclusions of the Traffic Analysis.
The project will include development of three access points to the site, two on
Buffalo Avenue, and one on Charles Smith Avenue. The project is consistent with
the goals of the Development Code that designates the area General
Industrial/Industrial Park. The project proponent will be required to construct the
necessary street improvements and as contained in the conditions of approval for
I .',r?..~ . . · h. ,.~
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 13
the project, pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to offset the
incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project.
b-d) Access to the site will be provided from Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue.
Two separate site entrances will exist on the west side and one on the northeast
side of the property. Adequate access for emergency vehicles will be provided with
a driveway width of 50 feet for access from Buffalo Avenue.
The project will require a total of 134 parking spaces, including both standard and
trailer sizes. The project design currently includes the development of 342 parking
spaces on-site. Vehicle use, including parking, will occupy just over 40 percent of
the total project area.
e/f) The proposed development exists in a General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned
district and should not cause any barriers to pedestrians or cyclists in the area.
Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue will remain the nearest
pedestrian/bicyclist used streets in proximity to the project site.
g) The subject site is located approximately 41/2 miles northeast of Ontario Airport,
offset north of the flight path. The development will not be dangerous to the site
occupants or Ontario International Airport aircraft..
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: .~c~n~ u~,,~ 'r~,
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) (,") ( ) ( )
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) (~')
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( )
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( )
vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ) (~)
Comments:
a) The site has experienced human disturbance and contains surface debris and minor
stockpiles throughout. Some portions of the site appeared disked, causing
significant disturbance to the plant community. The vegetation on site consists
mainly of non-native weedy vegetation, patches of native vegetation, and a few
remnant cultivated grape species, suggesting the site was previously used for grape
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 14
cultivation. The site is located in an area of sensitive biological resources, Delhi
Soils Area, as identified on Exhibit IV-3, City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan.
According to the Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands Flower - Loving Fly
(EcoSciences, November 2000), the wildlife species on site include evidence (a
single fecal pellet) of a burrowing owl (a California and federal species of special
concern). This species is protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and
the California Department of Fish and Game.
The following mitigation measure will be implemented prior to any grading or site
disturbance activities:
11. Occupied burrows used by burrowing owls shall not be disturbed during
the nesting season (February I through August 1) unless a qualified
biologist approved by CDFG verifies through non-invasive methods that:
1) the birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; 2) that juveniles
from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of
independent survival; or 3) that there are no occupied burrows on the
site.
b-c) There are no tree species present on site. According to the Focused Survey Report
for the Delhi Sands Flower - Loving Fly (EcoSciences, November 2000), the
dominant annual grassland species on site include short-podded mustard, brome
grasses, filaree, golden crownbeard, oat, horseweed, black mustard, and Russian
thistle. Small patches of native plants including ragweed, California buckwheat,
croton, Thurber's buckwheat, and telegraph weed exists on the site.
According to the Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands Flower - Loving Fly
(EcoSciences, November 2000), additional wildlife species onsite included the
California ground squirrel and San Diego horned lizards. Insect species present on
site include bee flies, robber flies, Sphecid wasps, cuckoo wasps, spider wasps,
velvet ants, ant lions, and various grasshopper species. No Delhi sands flower -
loving flies were detected on site during focused surveys for the species according
to the report.
d) There is no riparian Or wetland habitat on-site.
e) The surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridom that may have
occurred in the past. Existing development surrounding the site includes industrial
development to the north and south, a vacant lot followed by Interstate 15 to the
east, and a paved street to the west, followed by industrial development.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 15
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the '
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
inefficient manner?.
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Comments:
a-b) The project will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy
conservation.
c) The project site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone
(MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability,
However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated
Area of available resources due to urbanization. Additionally, the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occurring in an aggregate
extraction resource area (Exhibit IV-l, General Plan).
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ( ) ('")
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
brush, grass, or trees?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 16
Comments:
a/c/d)The site is currently undeveloped. No evidence of previous buildings on site was
observed. The proposed industrial development includes one industrial building with
loading areas. Any risks involving hazardous substances, or creation and exposure
to health hazards will not impact the project since future tenants are required to
abide by applicable City, State, and federal laws mandating industry operations
standards.
b) The proposed development should not interfere with any existing emergency
response or evacuation plan. Buffalo Avenue exists directly west of the site, and
.Charles Smith Avenue exists to the northeast. Access to the site will be provided
from both these streets. The proposed development includes three access roads:
two located on the west, and one on the northeast side of the site. The access
roads cause no interference to the existing roads.
e) The proposed development involves removing existing on site vegetation. The
proposed project causes no impacts with respect to flammable brush, grass, and
trees.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:. s~.,,~ Miflgath311Sigrtjt'~a~lt No
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (v) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
Comments:
a) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient
noise levels since the site is currently vacant. However, the impact is not considered
significant as the project is consistent with the Development Code, General
Industrial/Industrial Park zoned area with no sensitive receptors in the area.
b) The proposed project is the development of one industrial building with loading
areas. The development will remain consistent with surrounding land uses, zoned
as General Industrial/Industrial Park. The project development would generate
approximately 727 trips/day, creating no significant increase in noise caused by
traffic in the area, and not predicted to exceed City noise limits. Therefore this
impact is considered less than significant.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 17
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~ific,ntMitige,onSignificantNo
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the fo/lowing areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('")
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
Comments:
a-e) Fire Protection - The project site is located just east of the Buffalo Avenue and
~T~'ssi"~-~n ~-'~-~"Drive intersection, north of 4'" Street and west of Interstate 15.
According to the General Plan, Exhibit V-7, the site is located in Iow probability fire
risk area, and served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The
nearest fire station is located near the Jersey Boulevard/Milliken Avenue
intersection (Station No. 174), within I ½ miles of the subject property. The District
is responsible for evaluating the project through the City's Development Review and
Growth Management process. The proposed project will include structural fire
protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is
required.
Police Protection - Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with
the County Sheriff's Department. The proposed industrial development will include
standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all 'windows and
doors. The project design includes security gates at access locations and a guard
station at the northeast driveway. Additional police protection is not required as the
addition of one industrial building on the 23.91 acre lot creates no significant
increased security issues.
Schools -The project site is located within .the jurisdiction of the Cucamonga School
District. The project is designated General Industrial/Industrial Park, and is not
expected to cause a significant increase in the local workforce, and therefore does
not result in an impact to the school district.
Parks - The proposed industrial buildings will not generate a substantial number of
new people to the area. Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit
issuance. The new industrial development will therefore not cause a significant
impact to existing parks.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 18
Public facilities - The proposed development should not cause any significant
impact to public facilities located within the vicinity. The nearest public facilities to
the project site include the West Valley Detention Center to the east, a CHP station
to the west, a fire station to the northwest, and an animal shelter to the north
(Exhibit 111-9, General Plan). The project should not cause a significant impact to
these facilities.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the fo/lowing utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ('")
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ('~)
c) Local or mgi0nal water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) . ( ) ( ) ('~)
e) Storm water drainage? () { ) ('~) ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( )
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
Comments:
a-g) The proposed project includes the development of one industrial building.
Development will require an extension of the existing utilities available in the
immediate area. Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the
area are adequate, and will not require major modifications or alterations. The
current City contracted hauler will provide solid waste disposal. Waste will likely be
disposed of at the County of San Bemardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. The
project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff
from new hardscape and buildings proposed on the currently vacant site. The City
and Cucamonga County Water District currently handle wastewater conveyance
systems, while treatment is handled by Inland Empire Utilities Agency. These
systems are adequate to handle the increased services needed for the proposed
project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 19
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentia~yUntess Than
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7)
.Comments:
a-b) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway view corridor. The
proposed industrial development is consistent with the surrounding land uses and
creates no unusual aesthetic impacts in the area.
c) The project will create new light as the site is currently undeveloped. Since the
proposed development will be consistent with the surrounding land uses, and no
residential communities exist in the near vicinity, the light and glare caused by the
project should not cause impacts to the surrounding area.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~r~,~r, Mitlg~oll SignificantNo
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal:
a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7)
d) Have the p~)tential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ( ) (-")
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/)
the potential impact area?
Comments;
a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as
containing historic or cultural resources. Additionally, the site is located in an area
that is essentially surrounded by development and to date, no resources have been
· uncovered in the vicinity of the subject site. Therefore, no impacts to cultural
resources are anticipated by the proposed project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucam~nga
DRC2001-00718 Page 20
Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Unless
15. RECREATION. Would the proposah
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
regional parks or ether recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
Comments'..
a) The developer of the project will be required to pay park development fees as a
condition of approval. The impact is not considered significant.
b) The proposed project is located in a General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned distdct
and should not cause any impact to the existing recreational opportunities in the
area. The area immediately surrounding the project is developed in all directions
except to the east, where a vacant lot exists adjacent to Interstate 15.
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: ' s~..~ M,~,,~o. .S~.,~:~ .o
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. '
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) (~) ( ) ( )
potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels.
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (~') ( ) ( )
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive pedod of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
2.25
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 21
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentiallyUnless T~ln
C) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ( ) (~') )
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) (v) )
environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The Initial Study identifies potential significant adverse impacts to biological
resources. Implementation of mitigation measure #11 will assure less than
significant impacts to any potential burrowing owl habitat onsite. The 23.91 acre site
is undeveloped land and appears to have been previously disturbed, including
areas that appear previously disked. The northeast corner of the site appears to
have been graded. The site is mainly vegetated with grass, small weed species,
and shrubs species. No trees are present on the site.
b) The Initial Study identifies short-term impacts to air quality with development of the
project. However, the short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction
activities and do not exceed established thresholds. Implementation of the air
quality mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term
impacts to less than significant levels. As indicated in Table 2 of the URBEMIS7G
model in section 6, the project causes no potentially significant long-term air quality
impacts to the area. Abiding to the proposed mitigation measures further reduce
any air quality impacts caused by the project.
c) The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR,
Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant
adverse environmental effects of build out in the City and sphere of influence. The
City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant
adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and
aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of
these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant
levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing
the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant
unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h).
These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects
that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space.
With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further
discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required.
2
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 22
d) The proposed industrial development would not cause substantial adverse effects
on humans, either directly or indirectly.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study
and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500
Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(./) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR - City of Rancho
Cucamonga
(Certified October 17, 2001)
(v) General Plan - City of Rancho Cucamonga
(Certified October 17, 2001)
(v) Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly - EcoSciences
(Dated November 10, 2000)
(./) Traffic Impact Analysis for Oltman's Rancho Cucamongo - RBF Consulting
Dated July 25, 2001)
2ZZ-
Initial Study for city of Rancho Cu~monga
DRC2OO t-oo718 Page
APPUCANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the p~ject descdbeci in this Initial S'tuciy. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the pl*oposed mitigation measures, Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid
the effeate or mifgate the effects to a point where cleaHy no significant environmental effects
wou~ ocour.
Print Name and Tit]e: Z~.~c,
of Rancho Cucamonga
City
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00321
Public Review Period Closes: July 10, 2002
Project Name: Project Applicant: H.P.A., INC.
Project Location (also see attached map): Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue-APN: 209-263-68.
Project Description: A request to amend the cimulation within the Industrial Development District (Subareas
12 and 13) to eliminate a portion of Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue -
APN: 209-263-68. Related file: Development Review DRC2001-00718.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE
CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT, SUBAREAS 12 AND 13, TO ELIMINATE A PORTION
OF MISSION PARK DRIVE FROM BETWEEN BUFFALO AVENUE
AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. H.P.A., Inc./Oltman's Investment Company filed for Development Code
Amendment No. DRC2002-00321, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Subject Development code Amendment is referred to
as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in
the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing on July 10, 2002, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to
the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor
the surrounding properties.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00321 - H.P.A., INC.
July 10, 2002
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission thereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner
consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the
Development Code; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the
environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State
CEQA quidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial
Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission;
and further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in
said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an
adverse impact upon wildlife resoumes or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.
Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the
staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission
during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00321 - H.P.A., INC.
July 10, 2002
Page 3
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3
and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code
Amendment No. DRC2002-00321 by adoption of this resolution and the attached
Exhibits "A" and "B."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 2002.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNeil, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 2002, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080
:IGURE 17.30.080-N
Revised 411/~2
f~Of~TlON
OF STREET
ELI~IIgATED
zz<Z
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30. 080
FIGURE '17.30.080-O
~ 12~ FLO.W. Revised 4/1/92.
~ 'tOO' R.O.W.
_,|," , ~
TRAIL.$/ROU'I~$
~) O O O PF. DESTRIAN
~ SIa~CIAL STRr:ET~__,AP~/ ·
PORTION
' LIMINATED
SHERIFF STATION .
Note: Parcel lines and lot configu~Uo~ are ~
sho~ as approximations only.
1 The sites shown may not be cu~enfly o~ed
nor is ~e Ioca~on si~ specific. ~e
depicUon of a si~ Is an indication of a ~
projected ~mm n~d ~at may be adjusted
over ~me as ~e G~ develops. 0 4~ ~o' ~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: DRC 2001-00718
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measuras are recorded with the acti°n and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all' phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms rotan impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten
notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms Of guarantee)
with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff
time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director pdor
to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
;,i' Project File No.: DRC 2001-00718 Applicant: Bradshaw Ill
-,', Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: June 17, 2002
The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing CP C Review of plans A/C 2
agent) approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) dally to reduce PM~o
emission, In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue shall be swept CP C Review of plans A/C 2
according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o
emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site.
Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
· Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds CP C Review of plane A/C 2
exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the see during
such episodes. CP C ·. Review of plans AJC 2
Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) .
shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain
inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
CP B/C 'Review of plans A/C 2
Contractor shall select the construction equipment baaed on
Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency.
construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in
accordance with the manufecturer'e specifications· CP C Review of plans A/C 2
Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible. CP/CE B Review of plans C 2
The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-
grading plane include a statement that work crews will shut off CP/CE B/C Review of Plans C 2
equipment when not in use.
Contractor shall use Iow VOC asphalt during the asphalt paving CP B Verification of B 2
portions of the project. SCAQMD
applicability
If applicable, the project applicant wilt abide by SCAQMD Rule
1634 by providing electrical power at project designated truck
stop locations to reduce NOx emissions caused by trucks
stationed over extended parlode of time. I
Occupied burrow used by Burrowing Owls shall not be disturbed CP Review of Biologist D 2
during the nesting season (February I through August 1) unless a Report of Flndlngs
qualified biologist approved by CDFG verifies through non-lnvas~ve
methods that: 1) the birds have not begun egg-la~ng and
incubation; 2) that Juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging
independently and are capable of independent suwival; or 3) that
there are no occupied burrows on the site.
~ to Checklist Abbreviations
CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
AYES: . MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MANNERINO
ABSTAIN TOLSTOY - carded
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
E. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
initiate an amendment to delete Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith
Avenue in the Industrial Park and General Industrial Districts (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively)
- APN: 209-263-68. Related File: Development Review DRC2001-00718.
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Stewart asked for clarification of the Improvement Certificate referenced in Mr.
Eagle's letter.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that when the property subdivided at the time AutoNation
was developed, no public improvements were initiated; however the street was shown on the
General Plan and on the Development Code plan and concerns were raised by property owners in
the area. He stated language was therefore added to the Improvement Certificate of the Parcel Map
indicating the street was to be constructed as provided in the Development Code or any amendment
with further development. He observed that the project applicant is therefore now asking to amend
the Development Cede to delete the street, which would mean they would be developing consistent
with the Development Code but would not have to provide the street.
Chairman McNiel invited public comment.
Chuck Bouquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho
Cucamonga, stated he was involved at the time of the Improvement Certificate. He said he then
represented property owners on Charles Smith Avenue. He stated that early circulation plans for the
City provided for Charles Smith Avenue to go down to a cul-de-sac just north of 4th Street. He
stated the property owners were not too concerned because of that plus there was also another
street shown connecting through to Buffalo Avenue. He stated that when AutoNation came through
the City was supportive of AutoNation and allowed the cul-de-sac farther north than originally
intended and that concemed the property owners on Charles Smith Avenue leading to the addition of
the Improvement Certificate. He said Cardlock bought their property as a result of the Improvement
Certificate being placed on Parcel 3 because Cardlock's business is designed for trucks and other
commercial vehicles to come in and fuel up. He said that Oltman's was also processing a project
with two large buildings when Automation was processed. He stated he represented a client who
was losing about 300 of street frontage. He said they met with the City Engineer and negotiated the
Improvement Certificate, to require a street connection from Charles Smith Avenue through to
Buffalo Avenue. He said his clients at the time believed that a street would be constructed when
development occurred. He stated he appreciated staff's comment that the Code could be amended,
but observed his clients were not engineers and believed they would be getting a street. He
suggested that the street be moved south of the proposed building to tie into the Mission Park area
across the way and still provide the promised connection to Charles Smith Avenue. He said the
property owners on Charles Smith feel deletion of the street will leave them landlocked and the use
of their property will be inhibited and restricted.
Basil Johnson, Oltman's Construction Company, 20 East Pamela Road, Arcadia, stated that the
properties will not be landlocked. He said it was his understanding that the City abandoned the idea
of having Charles Smith Avenue tie into 4th Street because it is too close to the freeway and would
Planning Commission Minutes -5- May 22, 2002
be dangerous. He stated they wanted the cul-de-sac to go south 900 feet but the Fire Marshal would
only allow 600 feet. He said they improved Charles Smith Avenue and put in the storm drainage to
feed into the CalTrans channel under the freeway and he said they will have to improve the balance
of Charles Smith Avenue on the east side with development of the new building, whereas typically a
pmperbj owner only improves to the centerline. He observed that Oltman's will be spending close to
$500,000 for the storm drain system. He felt the people on the east side of the street should have
split the cost with them but they haven't and Oltman's did not ask them to; therefore, he felt the other
properbj owners are getting a free dde. He said they submitted plans to the City for initial planning
review and were given only two items to take care of: 1) to provide a fly report and 2) conduct a
traffic study to be sure there is no over usage of any intersections. He said when the full application
was submitted, Engineering advised them they would have to amend the Code to delete the street
and Engineering staff indicated there should not be any problem because it was a street extension
that was drawn on the map many years ago and wasn't needed. He said they were so confident it
would not be a problem, that they had the design team go ahead with working drawings and design
work costing approximately $200,000 has already been done. He stated having a street along the
south end of the property would not benefit his cbmpany at all and would probably cost at least
$800,000 to construct. He noted it would also reduce the size of their proposed 450,000 square foot
building by at least 90,000 square feet and would not meet the needs of to the adjacent tenants to
the north. He said the tenants need the whole 450,000 square feet to combine with the other
buildings to the north to centralize their operation. He did not feel the street is a necessity.
Chairman McNiel asked the distance from San Marino Drive to their northern property line and the
depth of their property.
Mr. Johnson estimated the distance to their northern property line to be approximately 500 feet and
the depth to be about 800 - 900 feet.
Dawn Wilson, RBF Consulting, 5050 Avenida Enclnas, Carlsbad, stated they prepared the traffic
analysis. She said their main point was that in 2020, San Marino Drive will be below capacity;
therefore it was unlikely that additional roadway trips would be diverted to the Mission Park Road.
She said the analysis also showed that all the intersections will operate at acceptable levels of
service and an additional intersection would not benefit the City.
There were no additional public comments.
Chairman McNiel stated the distance from San Marino Drive to where the originally proposed street
would be approximately 850 feet. He did not think there are many streets that close together in that
area. He did not believe the deletion of this portion of Mission Park Drive would appreciably impact
any existing or future developments on Charles Smith Ddve because of the close proximity of San
Madno Drive. He felt traffic would go up Buffalo Avenue from 4th Street to get there.
Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias, to direct staff to process an amendment to the
Development Code upon submission of an application and fees by the project developer. Motion
carded by the following vote:
AYES: MAClAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MANNERINO - carried
F. CONSIDERATION OF SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - CHARLES JOSEPH
ASSOCIATES - A request to initiate an amendment to allow senior housing as a permitted use
within Planning Area VIII of the Empire Lakes project.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.
Planning Commission .Minutes -6- May 22, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. O,Z- 2-,~:~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE PER DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-
00321 AMENDING THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREAS 12 AND 13,
TO ELIMINATE MISSION PARK DRIVE EAST OF BUFFALO
AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 209-263-68
A. Recitals.
1. Oltman's Investment Company filed an application to amend the
Development Code, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On May 22, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to initiate an amendment to delete'
Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue in the Industrial
Park and General Industrial Districts (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively) and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing that recommended
approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2002-0321 recommending to the City
Council that the said Development Code Amendment be approved.
4. A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Code Amendment is
included as a part of the attached draft Ordinance.
5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the environmental
determination prepared for said project, DRC2002-00321 Development Code Amendment.
Related Project: DRC2001-00718 - Development Review.
6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
13. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00321
August 21, 2002
Page 2
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby specifically finds that the Amendment for "the
application" and each and every term and provision contained herein conforms to the
General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. This Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Development Code to
permit the elimination of Mission Park Drive, east of Buffalo Avenue, as described in "the
application"- DRC2002-00321 and as specified in the attached draft Ordinance.
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321, TO
AMEND THE STREET CIRCULATION WITHIN THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREAS 12 AND
13, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF MISSION PARK DRIVE
EAST OF BUFFALO AVENUE BY AMENDING SECTION
17.30.080, FIGURES 17.30.080-O AND 17.30.080-N OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. On May 22, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on a request to initiate
an application to amend the Development Code to delete Mission Park Drive
between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue in the Industrial Park
and General Industrial District (Subareas 12 and 13, respectively). The
Planning Commission moved to direct staff to process said amendment to the
Development Code.
2. Oltman's Investment Company filed an application for Development Code
Amendment DRC2002-00321 as described in the title of this Ordinance.
Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment is
referred to as "the application.
3. On July 10, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
issued Resolution No. 02-65, recommending to the City Council that the
Development Code Amendment No. DRC2002-00321 be approved.
4. On August 21, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued
Resolution No. approving the Development Code Amendment
DRC2002-00321.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as
follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that a~l of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2002-00321
August 21, 2002
Page 2
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on August 21, 2002, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development;
and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use
Element; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the
adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the
environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Monitoring Program, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated
Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said
Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all
significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition
of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below.
Environmental Mitigation
Air Quality
1) The site shall be treated with water a minimum of twice per day, or
other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily
ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2002o00321
August 21,2002
Page 3
to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
This will result in a minimum reduction of 68 percent of PMm emissions
during grading.
2) Public roads used for access to the site (Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue) shall be swept according to a schedule established by
the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of
soil off-site. The site access haul road will be watered a minimum of
twice daily. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of
construction. This will result in approximately three percent reduction
of PM~o emissions.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25
mph to minimize PMm emissions from the site during such episodes.
Emissions reduction no quantifiable.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall
be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96
hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions.
5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency.
The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading
plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
This will result in five percent reductions of ROG, NOx, andPM~0
emissions.
6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment
when not in use.
8) The construction contractor shall use Iow VOC asphalt during the
asphalt paving portions of the project.
Traffic
1) To mitigate the impacted intersections to LOS D or better, the
applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair
share of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer.
These include but are not limited to widening roadways to their full
ZqD
ORDINANCE NO.
DRC2002-00321
August 21, 2002
Page 4
width to add additional lanes, restriping existing roads to add
additional lanes, signalizing intersections, or other improvements
identified by the City Engineer.
Noise
1) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally
increase ambient noise levels since the site is currently vacant.
However, the impact is not considered significant as the project is
consistent with the Development Code, General Industrial/Industrial
Park zoned area with no sensitive receptors in the area.
2) The proposed project is the development of one industrial building with
loading areas. The development will remain consistent with
surrounding land uses, zoned as General Industrial/Industrial Park.
The project development would generate approximately 727 trips/day,
creating no significant increase in noise caused by traffic in the area,
and not predicted to exceed City noise limits. Therefore this impact is
considered less than significant
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the
record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for
the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have
potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence
contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reported and
exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public
hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect
as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3
above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment
DRC2001-00321 to amend the street circulation within the Industrial
Development District, Subareas 12 and 13, eliminating the extension of
Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue by
amending Figures 17.30.080-O and 17.30.080-N of the Rancho Cucamonga
Development Code as shown in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" to this Ordinance.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
2'//
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30. 080
FIGURE 17.30.080-N
Revised
18'
f~ORTION
OF 5TRE_ET
I-FO
ELI~IHATEg
· CIICUI. ATION : TRMLS/ROUTE$
I '12~ R-o-W" 0 0 0 O' Pedeet~an ~ee*-,.m (~skI &
88' o~ I.~,R.O.W. Reg~-naJ parkl :'
~ Landsoa~ng
-'I-+q-++'- Prolx~ffi .~ Access Pobl~
· 0 400~ 800; "1600~ 11t~tesl~lslm~mmaynotbecurrenllY,°Wnedn°rbthe
Ioc41tlo/i site iR:mcllc. The del:]Ictioll of s site is an
Note: Parcel lines and lot court, rations k~catlon of a ixojec~d future need ~at may be
are shown as ap~,.Ox!*metJon only. .ndjustod over ~ as the City develop, s~ ,
6/~qL
City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080
FIGURE 17.30.080-O
~ 10~ R.O.W.
R~II. SERVICE u~
:: ., , ~ .~
0 0 0 0 ~mAN
~Y ~
FOffTION
OF 5T LE-
Note: Parcel lines and lot configurations are ,~
shown as approximations only,
The sites shown may not be cu~enfly o~ed
nor is ~e location site sp~ci~c. Th~
d.pictio~ of a $it~ is a~ ~.~icatio. of a ~
projected ~Nre n~d ~at may be adjusted
over time as ~e Ci~ develops. 0 4~~ ~0' ~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TO:
FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority and criteria
contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the staff
has analyzed the request for:
PROJECT NAME: DRC 2001-00718 and DRC 2002-00321
PROJECT LOCATION: East side of Buffalo, north of 4th Street, west of the I-15 Freeway, Rancho
Cucamonga, California
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for the proposed
construction of one concrete tilt-up industrial building of 454,087 square feet on a 23.91-acre site, in
the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) and Industrial Park District (Subarea 12); and a proposed
Development Code Amendment to eliminate Mission Park Avenue between Buffalo Avenue and
Charles Smith Avenue.
After reviewing the Initial Study and any applicable mitigating measures for the project, the staff has
determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared.
A public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission to consider this proposed NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Council Chamber, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga; on July 10, 2002.
Public conunents on the Negative Declaration will be received by the City beginning on June 19,
2002, through July 10, 2002.
June 17, 2002
Page 2
Copies of all relevant material, including the project specifications and all documents referenced in
the Negative Declaration, are available for public inspection at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center,
Planning Division, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
The project site is not listed on any list of hazardous waste sites prepared pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5. Any information contained in a Hazardous Waste Substances Statement is
attached to this Notice.
2t45
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: DRC 2001-00718 and Public Review Period Closes: July 10, 2002
DRC 2002-00321
Project Name: Bradshaw III Project Applicant: OItmans Investment Company
10005 Mission Mill Road
Whittier CA 90608
Project Location (also see attached map): The 23.91-acre site is located on the west of the 1-15 Freeway,
on the east s~de of Buffalo Avenue, north of 4 Stree.
Project Description: The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for the proposed construction of
one concrete tilt-up industrial building of 454,087 square feet on a 23.91-acre site, in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 13) and Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), and a proposed Development Code
Amendment to eliminate Mission Park Avenue between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect' on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment,
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required,
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
Date of Determination Adopted By
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Development Review/DRC2001-00718, and
Development Code Amendment/DRC2002-00321
2. Related Files: Preliminary Review 00-29
3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC
2001-00718 - Bradshaw III - A request to construct a 454,087 square foot industrial
building on 23.91 acres of land in the Industrial Park and General Industrial Districts
(Subarea 12 and Subarea 13, respectively), located on the east side of Buffalo Avenue,
approximately 465 feet south of San Marino Driver - APN 0229-263-68 Related Files
PR 00-29.
Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00321 -
Bradshaw III - A request to amend the circulation element within the Industrial
Development District of Subarea 12 and 13, to eliminate a portion of Mission Park Drive
between Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue. APN209-263-68. Related File
DRC2001-00718.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Oltmans Investment Co.
10005 Mission Mill Road
Whittier, CA 90608
5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial/Industrial Park
6. Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 13)/Industrial Park (Subarea 12)
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 23.91 acre site is undeveloped vacant land,
mainly vegetated with grass, small weed, and shrub species. Scattered remains of
domestic grape plants exist on the site, suggesting the site was previously used for
grape cultivation. The site slopes gently south at approximately a I to 1.5 percent
gradient. Household waste and small debris piles were observed throughout the site. In
addition, a sand/gravel pile, an empty wooden reel, and several empty plastic buckets
were present on the northeast side of the site. A Caltrans drainage channel exists on the
northeast side of the site. The drainage transports storm water from Charles Smith
Avenue eastward underneath Interstate 15. The site and surrounding area are located
within the General Industrial/Industrial Park district. Industrial development borders the
property to the north. A vacant lot adjacent to Interstate 15 borders the site to the east.
Charles Smith Avenue ends near the northeast side of the site. The recently completed
Costco borders the site to the south, followed by 4th Street. Buffalo Avenue borders the
site to the west, followed by industrial development.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 2
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
State Water Resources Control Board - National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permits for storm water discharge associated with construction activity and a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
(./) Land Use and Planning (v') Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (,/) Biological Resources (,,') Utilities and Service Systems
(,/) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources
(v') Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Aesthetics
(v') Noise ( ) Cultural Resources
II (v') Air Quality (,/) Mandatory Findings of Significance { ) Recreation
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner
June17, 2002
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 4
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an
explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant. Impact" answers, including a
discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified.
Pote~tia~y Signiflc~t Po~entlallyUnlesslmpecl impact Than Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sig,~,~.~ M~tiga~on Significant No
I irrlpactI incorp<)rated Irr~act
1, LAND USE AND PLANNING, Would the proposab
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) (.") ( )
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
vicinity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
established community?
Comments:
a-d) The subject site lies within an industrial zoned area, in accordance with the
Development Code, Chapter 17.30 General Industrial (Subarea 13)/Industrial Park
(Subarea 12). The project consists of developing one industrial building on the
currently undeveloped 23.91 acre lot located east of the Buffalo Avenue and
Mission Park Drive intersection. Surrounding properties include industrial buildings
north, south, and west of the property. The project's implementation causes no
conflict or disturbance to the surrounding land uses since properties are currently
developed with similar uses or are zoned industrial. The project will generate
increased emissions in the area during construction and project operations.
Section 5 - Air Quality discusses the emissions generated by the project, analysis
of impacts, and proposed mitigation measures.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
2. POPULA'rtON I~D I-IOUS~G. Would the proposah
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ( ( ) (,')
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (")
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
221
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 5
Issues and Supporting Informalion Sources: Potentially Unless Than
C) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
housing?
Comments:
a-b) The project consists of developing one industrial building totaling 454,087 square
feet of floor area. The project will employ no more than 80 people, of which
approximately 75 percent will be employed from the local area. Therefore, the
projects' development should cause no significant increase in total workers within
the area. Due to the region's housing rich situation and the projected 75 pement
locally employed workforce, the project will improve the city's job and housing
balance. The project will not result in a change in population projections.
c) The site is currently undeveloped. The surrounding land uses include only industrial
developments. During the site inspection, no residential housing units were
observed near the project site. Therefore, the project should have no impact to the
existing housing in the area.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polenflally Unless Than
3. GEOLOGIC F'ROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (,~) ( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( )
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the lend? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v)
Comments:
a-b) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill
Fault (see Figure V-1 in the 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan). The Red
Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 4 miles northwest of the site, and
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 6
the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies within 6.5 miles north of the site. Both these faults are
capable of producing a moment magnitude (M~,) 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes. The San
Jacinto Fault Zone, capable of producing up to Mw 6.9 earthquakes, passes within
10 miles northeast of the site. The San Andreas fault, capable of up to M,~ 8.2
earthquakes, passes within 13.5 miles to the north. These faults are capable of
producing intense ground shaking on the subject site. Adhering to the Uniform Building
Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant.
c) Liquefaction occum when, loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subject to ground
shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude. Additionally, liquefaction may occur
when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface. Based on ground
water depths within the area (approximately 300-350 feet below surface grade), the
potential for liquefaction within the project area is unlikely. Adhedng to the City grading
standards, and the Uniform Building Code, will ensure that geologic impacts are less
than significant.
d) The site is not located near a body of water. According to Figure V-5 of the City's
General Plan, the site is not within a 100-year flood plain. An existing Caltrans
storm drain passes through the northeast side of the site, transporting storm water
from Charles Smith Avenue underneath Interstate 15. The nearest Flood Control
facilities are the Church Street basin located within 3 miles northwest of the site,
and the Day Creek channel located within ~A mile east of the site. With the existing
Caltrans storm drainage on the site, the development of the project site will not
expose people or structures to any potential impacts.
e) The site slopes toward the south at I to 1.5 percent gradient. The site exists on
relatively flat area and no significant landslide and mudflow impacts exist. The
existing Caltrans storm water drainage will also help reduce any potential impacts.
f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project because the site is
currently vacant. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved
by the City Engineer.
g-h) Delhi fine sands is the main soil type present on site according to the Soil Survey of
San Bernardino County Southwestern Part, California (USDA, Soil Conservation
Service, 1980): According to the Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands
Flower-Loving Fly (GeoSciences, November 2000), the soils appear mostly sandy,
and compacted throughout the site. The site is mainly vegetated, but several areas
of unconsolidated soil are present. Delhi fine sand soil is characterized as having
very slow runoff. These soils have been used for crop irrigation, including grapes.
Their available water capacity is about 4 to 5 inches. The hazard for soil blowing is
moderate, but can be high if the soil is unprotected.
i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 7
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: Unless Tl~a,
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) (~') ( ) ( )
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/)
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) (~') ( )
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) (~')
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) (~')
of water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ('/)
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) (~')
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( )
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
Comments:
a/c-e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and the
building proposed on the currently vacant site. An existing Caltrans storm drain
passes through the northeast side of the site. The Part I of the Environmental
Information Form (provided by the applicant) indicated the project includes
development of an on-site storm drain connecting to the City's existing 4th Street
storm drain. Surface storm water generated by the project will be discharged into
the Caltrans drainage to the east, Buffalo Avenue drainage on the west, and the
Fourth Street storm drain via the proposed on-site storm drain. The final drainage
plan and report must I~e approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The
impacts are considered less than significant with the proposed drainage
developments.
As a standard condition of project approval, the applicant must prepare a
preliminary drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed. A
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 8
final report will be required prior to issuance of grading permits or final map
recordation.
Since grading on site will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The applicant must also submit a Notice of
Intent (NOI) to the SWRCB for coverage under the state's NPDES General Permit.
The SWRCB will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMP's) during
construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or
storm water conveyance channels. BMP's would include, but are not limited to
street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or
sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation
measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion are
less than significant:
1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMP's to
be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMP's
shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the
City Engineer.
A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show
how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and site
operations. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the
Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMP's
identified in the SWPPP, submitted to the SWRCB, will make this impact less than
significant.
b) Based on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the project siie is outside of the
100-year flood plain. The project includes development of an on-site storm drain
and discharging into the existing storm drains surrounding the site.
f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area
as the site is not used for groundwater recharge.
I
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) (,/) ) ( )
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ) (~')
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ) (v)
cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 9
Comments:
a) The proposed industrial development will increase pollutant levels during
construction and project operations. The criteria pollutants screened for included:
reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and
particulates (PMm). Air quality impacts caused during project development are
discussed in the Construction Emissions section, and long-term operational impacts
are discussed in the Operations Emissions section.
Construction Emissions
Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds
during grading activities for PM~0 and NOx. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~o) will
be generated. However, since there are existing industrial developments within the
vicinity of the site, and since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status
for ozone and suspended particulates (PMm), fugitive dust will be mitigated by the
following measures:
2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents
(~pproved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in
accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
3. Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue shall be swept according to a
schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated
with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing 'may vary depending upon
time of year of construction.
4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes.
5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours
or more to reduce PM~o emissions.
During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment
and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, will
increase NOx and PMm levels in the area. The following mitigation measures will
ensure impacts to existing industrial development are at less than significant levels.
6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used
on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The
construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 10
9. The construction contractor shall use Iow VOC asphalt during the asphalt
paving portions of the project.
The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G
(URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The
program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. Though
not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the
effectiveness of control measures. Table I shows construction emission results
before and after the mitigation measures have been implemented.
Table 1
URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary
~Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOr CO PM~0
Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit.
Grading 1.33 1.33 25.86 24.57 23.05 8.80
Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.02
Mobile Equip. 4.22 4.01 47.68 45.~30 5.98 5.68
Arch. Coatings 0.00 0.00
Asphalt 0.87 0.83
Totals 6.76 6.44 73.82 70.14 0.00 0.00 29.05 14.50
SCAQMD Thres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150
Significance No No No No No No No No
Operational Emissions
The project will increase NOx emission levels in the area. Since industrial
development mainly surrounds the project site, reducing the NOx emissions will
cumulatively benefit the area's air quality. The proposed project includes
development of multiple dock doors around the industrial building where trailers
would be parked, loaded/unloaded, then towed by tractor off site. A major portion of
the project related emissions will occur due to the use of tractor trailer rigs entering
and leaving the site. Trucks stationed over extended time periods during the
loading/unloading of trailers often leave their engines running to power the electrical
systems in the cab. This contributes to increased operational NOx levels. According
to the project architect, one trailer tractor (also referred to as a "yard dog") will assist
in moving trailers around the site.
In November of 2001, SCAQMD adopted Rule 1634, providing an opportunity to
generate NOx mobile source emissions reduction credits for use in RECLAIM by
using electrical power instead of keeping diesel-powered engines running at truck
stops. Abiding to this rule will help reduce NOx levels caused by diesel-powered
trucks stationed at the proposed truck stops during operations at the site. Based on
the recently adopted SCAQMD Rule 1634, mitigation measure #10 will reduce the
operational NOx emission level:
initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 11
10. If applicable, the project applicant will abide to SCAQMD Rule 1634 by
providing electrical power at project designated truck stop locations to
reduce NOx emissions caused by trucks stationed over extended periods
of time.
The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of
Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into
the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the industrial nature of the proposed
project, the default fleet mix and the default trip rate were modified to reflect the
results established in the Traffic Impact Analysis (RBF Consulting, 2001). Emissions
associated with these vehicle trips are listed in Table 2. The model calculated
mitigated emission values based on existing sidewalks in the project area. The NOx
emission level changes caused by mitigation measure #10 are not reflected in the
table.
Table 2
Operations Emissions
~Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOx CO PM~0
Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit.
Area Source 0.16 0.10 0.81 0.01 1.01 0.69 0.00 0.00
Mobile Source 24.80 24.78 27.40 27.36 .171.57 171.32 8.38 8.37
Totals 24.96 24.88 28.21 27.37 172.58 172.01 8.38 8.37.
SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150
Significance No No No No No No No No
b) The proposed industrial development is consistent with the surrounding areas
General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned district. Industrial development exists to the
north, south, and west of the project site. A vacant lot adjacent to Interstate 15
borders the project site to the east. No sensitive receptors are present in the
surrounding area.
c-d) The proposed project is the development of 23.91 acres of land into one industrial
building with loading areas consistent with the surrounding areas General Industrial/
Industrial Park zoned district. Since no sensitive receptors exist in the area, any
impacts caused by generated emissions, that could cause climatic changes or
objectionable odors, will not be significant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (v) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 12
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ) ( ('~)
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ) ( (~')
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? )
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) (")
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( )
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) (")
Comments:
a) The proposed project includes the construction of one (1) industrial building with
loading areas. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (RBF Consulting, 2001 ) project
· generated daily trips, the ITE trip rate was modified to 1.60 trips pep day per
1,000 square feet of developed area. Based on this trip rate, the proposed project
will generate 727 trips per day with 45 trips occurring during the morning peak hour
and 68 trips occurring during the afternoon peak hour. Buffalo Avenue and Charles
Smith Avenue provide primary access to the site. According to the Traffic Impact
Analysis completed by RBF Consulting in July 2001, the proposed project should
not cause any significant traffic issues during development or thereafter.
Forecast volumes for 2020 indicated the Buffalo Avenue/4th Street intersection is
expected to operate at an unacceptable PM Peak level without the proposed
project. Recommended mitigation for this intersection includes restriping the
southbound approach to accommodate dual left turn lanes. In addition, the
Development Code (Industrial Districts Subarea 12 and 13) calls for the extension
of Mission Park Drive through the proposed project site to connect Buffalo Avenue
to Charles Smith Avenue. This street extension would prevent the development of
the proposed project as only one industhal building. The Traffic Impact Analysis
concluded that since the proposed extension of Mission Park Drive will not
significantly impact traffic in the study area, and since the proposed project will have
street,access on both Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue, the proposed
street extension is not recommended. Thus, the proposed Development Code
Amendment to eliminate the extension of Mission Park Drive is supported by the
conclusions of the Traffic Analysis.
The project will include development of three access points to the site, two on
Buffalo Avenue, and one on Charles Smith Avenue. The project is consistent with
the goals of the Development Code that designates the area General
Industrial/Industrial Park. The project proponent will be required to construct the
necessary street improvements and as contained in the conditions of approval for
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 13
the project, pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to offset the
incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project.
b-d) Access to the site will be provided from Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue.
Two separate site entrances will exist on the west side and one on the northeast
side of the property. Adequate access for emergency vehicles will be provided with
a driveway width of 50 feet for access from Buffalo Avenue.
The project will require a total of 134 parking spaces, including both standard and
trailer sizes. The project design currently includes the development of 342 parking
spaces on-site. Vehicle use, including parking, will occupy just over 40 percent of
the total project area.
e/f) The proposed development exists in a General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned
district and should not cause any barriers to pedestrians or cyclists in the area.
Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue will remain the nearest
pedestrian/bicyclist used streets in proximity to the project site.
g) The subject site is located approximately 4Y2 miles northeast of Ontario Airport,
offset north of the flight path. The development will not be dangerous to the site
occupants or Ontario International Airport aircraft.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~.~,y Unless Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) (-') ( ) ( )
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) (-')
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( )
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) (~')
vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) (~')
Comments:
a) The site has experienced human disturbance and contains surface debris and minor
stockpiles throughout. Some portions of the site appeared disked, causing
significant disturbance to the plant community. The vegetation on site consists
mainly of non-native weedy vegetation, patches of native vegetation, and a few
remnant cultivated grape species, suggesting the site was previously used for grape
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 14
cultivation. The site is located in an area of sensitive biological resources, Delhi
Soils Area, as identified on Exhibit IV-3, City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan.
According to the Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands Flower - Loving Fly
(EcoSciences, November 2000), the wildlife species on site include evidence (a
single fecal pellet) of a burrowing owl (a California and federal species of special
concern). This species is protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and
the California Department of Fish and Game.
The following mitigation measure will be implemented prior to any grading or site
disturbance activities:
1 1. Occupied burrows used by burrowing owls shall not be disturbed during
the nesting season (February I through August 1) unless a qualified
biologist approved by CDFG verifies through non-invasive methods that:
1) the birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; 2) that juveniles
from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of
independent survival; or 3) that there are no occupied burrows on the
site.
b-c) There are no tree species present on site. According to the Focused Survey Report
for the Delhi Sands Flower - Loving Fly (EcoSciences, November. 2000), the
dominant annual grassland species on site include short-podded mustard, brome
grasses, filaree, golden cmwnbeard, oat, horseweed, black mustard, and Russian
thistle. Small patches of native plants including ragweed, California buckwheat,
croton, Thurber's buckwheat, and telegraph weed exists on the site.
According to the Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands Flower - Loving Fly
(EcoSciences, November 2000), additional wildlife species onsite included the
California ground squirrel and San Diego horned lizards. Insect species present on
site include bee flies, robber flies, Sphecid wasps, cuckoo wasps, spider wasps,
velvet ants, ant lions, and various grasshopper species. No Delhi sands flower -
loving flies were detected on site during focused surveys for the species according
to the report.
d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site.
e) The surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have
occurred in the past. Existing development surrounding the site includes industrial
development to the north and south, a vacant lot followed by Interstate 15 to the
east, and a paved street to the west, followed by industrial development.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 15
Impact Sig~icant PotentiallYlmpact Impact Less
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pot~l~ U~rless Than
Significant Mitigation Signilicant No
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Comments:
a-b) The project will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy
conservation.
c) The project site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone
(MRZ-~). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of: known value and marketability.
However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated
Area of available resources due to urbanization. Additionally, the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occurring in an aggregate
extraction resource area (Exhibit IV-l, General Plan).
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unk~ss Than
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ) ('/)
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ) (/)
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) ('/)
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) ('~)
brush, grass, or trees?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 16
Comments:
a/c/d)The site is currently undeveloped. No evidence of previous buildings on site was
observed. The proposed industrial development includes one industrial building with
loading areas. Any risks involving hazardous substances, or creation and exposure
to health hazards will not impact the project since future tenants are required to
abide by applicable City, State, and federal laws mandating industry operations
standards.
b) The proposed development should not interfere with any existing emergency
response or evacuation plan. Buffalo Avenue exists directly west of the site, and
Charles Smith Avenue exists to the northeast. Access to the site will be provided
from both these streets. The proposed development includes three access roads:
two located on the west, and one on the northeast side of the site. The access
roads cause no interference to the existing roads.
e) The proposed development involves removing existing on site vegetation. The
proposed project causes no impacts with respect to flammable brush, grass, and
trees.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poto,,a~h,Unless Than
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ('~) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
Comments:
a) The project would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient
noise levels since the site is currently vacant. However, the impact is not considered
significant as the project is consistent with the Development Code, General
Industrial/Industrial Park zoned area with no sensitive receptors in the area.
b) The proposed project is the development of one industrial building with loading
areas. The development will remain consistent with surrounding land uses, zoned
as General Industrial/Industrial Park. The project development would generate
approximately 727 trips/day, creating no significant increase in noise caused by
traffic in the area, and not predicted to exceed City noise limits. Therefore this
impact is considered less than significant.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 17
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Than
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the fo/lowing areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
c) Schools? ( ) ( ( ) ('~)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ( ) (~')
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ( ) (~')
Comments:
a-e) Fire Protectio.n. - The project site is located just east of the Buffalo Avenue and
~-~'si-~n ~ Drive intersection, north of 4th Street and west of Interstate 15.
According to the General Plan, Exhibit V~7, the site is located in Iow probability fire
risk area, and served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The
nearest fire station is located near the Jersey Boulevard/Milliken Avenue
intersection (Station No. 174), within I ~ miles of the subject property. The District
is responsible for evaluating the project through the City's Development Review and
Growth Management process. The proposed project will include structural fire
protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is
required.
Police Protection - Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with
the County Sheriff's Department. The proposed industrial development will include
standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and
doors. The project design includes security gates at access locations and a guard
station at the northeast driveway. Additional police protection is not required as the
addition of one industrial building on the 23.91 acre lot creates no significant
increased security issues.
Schools -The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Cucamonga School
District. The project is designated General Industrial/Industrial Park, and is not
expected to cause a significant increase in the local workforce, and therefore does
not result in an impact to the school district.
Parks - The proposed industrial buildings will not generate a substantial number of
new people to the area. Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit
issuance. The new industrial development will therefore not cause a significant
impact to existing parks.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page
Public facilities - The proposed development should not cause any significant
impact to public facilities located within the vicinity. The nearest public facilities to
the project site include the West Valley Detention Center to the east, a CHP station
to the west, a fire station to the northwest, and an animal shelter to the north
(Exhibit 111-9, General Plan). The project should not cause a significant impact to
these facilities.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (")
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ('Q ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (")
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (")
Comments:
a-g) The proposed project includes the development of one industrial building.
Development will require an extension of the existing utilities availablein the
immediate area. Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the
area are adequate, and will not require major modifications or alterations, The
current City contracted hauler will provide solid waste disposal. Waste will likely be
disposed of at the County of San Bernardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill. The
project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff
from new hardscape and buildings proposed on the currently vacant site. The City
and Cucamonga County Water District currently handle wastewater conveyance
systems, while treatment is handled by Inland Empire Utilities Agency. These
systems are adequate to handle the increased services needed for the proposed
project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 19
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Un~ess Than
13, AESTHETICS. Would the proposah
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
Comments:
a-b) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway view corridor. The
proposed industrial development is consistent with the surrounding land uses and
creates no unusual aesthetic impacts in the area.
c) The project will create new light as the site is currently undeveloped. Since the
proposed development will be consistent with the surrounding land uses, and no
residential communities exist in the near vicinity, the light and glare caused by the
project should not cause impacts to the surrounding area.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po~entlally Unless Than
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah
a) Disturb Paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ) (~')
b) Disturb archaeological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ) ('")
c) Affect historical or cultural resoumes? ( ) ( ) ) (~')
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, ( ) ( ) ) (~')
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) )
the potential impact area?
Comments:
a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as
containing historic or cultural resources. Additionally, the site is located in an area
that is essentially surrounded by development and to date, no resources have been
uncovered in the vicinity of the subject site. Therefore, no impacts to cultural
resources are anticipated by the proposed project.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 20
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/)
Comments:
a) The developer of the project will be required to pay park development fees as a
condition of approval. The impact is not considered significant.
b) The proposed project is located in a General Industrial/Industrial Park zoned district
and should not cause any impact to the existing recreational opportunities in the
area. The area immediately surrounding the project is developed in all directions
except to the east, where a vacant lot exists adjacent to Interstate 15.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potefltially Unless Than
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) (~') ( ( )
potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California histo~ or prehistory?
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) (,/) ( ( )
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 21
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentie. lly Un.ss Than
C) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that ( ) ) (~') (
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ) ('/) (
environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adveme effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
a) The Initial Study identifies potential significant adverse ~mpacts to biological
resoumes. Implementation of mitigation measure #11 will assure less than
significant impacts to any potential burrowing owl habitat onsite. The 23.91 acre site
is undeveloped land and appears to have been previously disturbed, including
areas that appear previously disked. The northeast corner of the site appears to
have been graded. The site is mainly vegetated with grass, small weed species,
and shrubs species. No trees are present on the site.
b) The Initial Study identifies short-term impacts to air quality with development of the
project. However, the short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction
activities and do not exceed established thresholds. Implementation of the air
quality mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce shod-term
impacts to less than significant levels. As indicated in Table 2 of the URBEMIS7G
model in section 6, the project causes no potentially significant long-term air quality
impacts to the area. Abiding to the proposed mitigation measures further reduce
any air quality impacts caused by the project.
c) The proposed project'is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General
Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR,
Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant
adverse environmental effects of build out in the City and sphere of influence. The
City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant
adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and
aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of
these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant
levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing
the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant
unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h).
These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects
that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space.
With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further
discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 22
d) The proposed industrial development would not cause substantial adverse effects
on humans, either directly or indirectly.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study
and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500
Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(,/) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR - City of Rancho
Cucamonga
(Certified October 17, 2001)
(,~) General Plan - City of Rancho Cucamonga
(Certified October 17, 2001)
(,/) Focused Survey Report for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly - EcoSciences
(Dated November 10, 2000) ' .'
(,~) Traffic Impact Analysis for Oltman's Rancho Cucamongo - RBF Consulting
(Dated July 25, 2001)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DRC2001-00718 Page 23
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study, I acknowledge that I i
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the ~
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid
the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects
would occur.
Signature: Date:
Print Name and Title:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: DRC 2001-00718
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
271
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wdtten
notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)
with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff
time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior
to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: DRC 2001-00718 Applicant: Bradshaw II1
Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Date: June 17, 2002
The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing CP C Review of plans A/C 2
agent) approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) dally to reduce PM~0
emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403,
Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue shall be swept CP C Review of pians A/C 2
according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 .
emissions aecoclated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site.
Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds CP C Review of plans A/C 2
exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions fi.om the alta during
such episodes. CP C Review of plans A/C 2
Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)
shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain
inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2
Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on
Iow emission tactors and high-energy efficiency. All
construction equipment will be tuned and maintained In
accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. CP C Review of plans AJC 2
Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible. CP/CE B Review of plans C 2
The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-
grading plans Include a statement that work crews will shut off CP/CE B/C Review of Plans C 2
equipment when not in use.
Contractor shall use Iow VOC asphalt during the asphalt paving CP B Verification of B 2
SCAQMD
portions of the project, applicability
If applicable, the project applicant will abide by SCAQMD Rule
1634 by previding electrical power at project designated ~uck
stop locations to reduce NOx emissions caused by trucks
stationed over extended periods of time.
Occupied burrow used by Burrowing Owls shall not be disturbed CP B Review of Biologist D 2
during the nesting season (February 1 through August 1) unless a Report of Findings
qualified biologist app?oved by CDFG verifies through non-invasive
methods that: 1) the birds have not begun egg-laying and
incubation; 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging
independently and are capable of independent survival; or 3} that
there are no occupied burrows on the site,
Ke~ Abbreviations
CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspect~on 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior TO Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Ce~ficate of Occupancy
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP
THE CITY OF
!QAN C Il 0 CIICAM ON GA
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development Code to add text provisions for
Mixed Use development for two areas; Area One located on the north and south sides
of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the abandoned Southern Pacific
Railroad corridor (trestle), also known as the "Bear Gulch Area," and Area Two,
located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Hellman
Avenues, both as part of Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development District Map to change the land
use designations from General Commercial, Community Commercial, Office, Office
Park, and Specialty Commercial, to Mixed Use for 55 acres of land located on the
north and south sides of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the
abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad corridor (trestle), also known as the "Bear Gulch
Area," as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program - APN: 207-011-33, 35,
36, 43, 44, and 45; 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, and 41; 207-111-01, 02, 05 thru 17
and 23, 207-112-03, thru 06, 09 thru 11, 13 thru 16, 20 and 21; 207-113-01 thru 18,
and 23 thru 25; 207-123-33 and 34, and 207-571-75 thru 78.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development District Map to change the land
use designations from Community Commercial, Specialty Commercial, and Utility to
Mixed Use for 10 acres of land at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Archibald Avenue as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program
APN: 208-151-01, 14 thru16, and 19, and portions of 20 thru 22; 208-152-06, 07, 09
thru 12, 14, 16 thru 22; 208-153-01 thru 05, and 08 thru 23.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
above referenced Development Code and Development District Amendments through adoption o!
the attached ordinances.
275'
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DDA DRC2002-00446(A)(B)AND DCA DRC2002-00448
August21,2002
Page 2
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City Council adopted the updated General Plan in October of
2001. The update includes provisions for Mixed Use development in the above referenced areas.
There are also provisions for the proportions or percentages of different uses within the land use
"mixture." Therefore, there are two types of amendments before the City Council; one being an
amendment to the Development District Map to specify the two areas along Foothill Boulevard as
Mixed Use instead of General Commercial, Community Commercial, Office, Office Park, and
Specialty Commercial as currently shown. The other is a text amendment to the Development
Code to add the use percentage and intensity provisions for Mixed Use areas per the General
Plan. Together, these amendments will provide consistency with the General Plan as Phase II of
the General Plan Consistency Program.
The request proposes to change approximately 55 acres in the Bear Gulch area presently
designated Specialty Commercial, Community Commercial, Office and Office Park, and 10 acres
at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue presently designated
Specialty Commercial, Community Commercial, and Utility to the Mixed Use designation. The
amendments are necessary to bring the Development District Map and the Development Code
into conformance with the updated General Plan. Note that the General Plan has Mixed Use
provisions for 37.5 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman and Archibald
Avenues. The Development Districts Map already shows a majority of this area as Mixed Use.
Only 10 of the 37.5 acres in this vicinity are not yet shown as Mixed Use on the Map and
therefore need to be changed. The Development Code however does not currently include the
land use percentages for the entire 37.5 acres; hence, the discrepancy between the land area
being rezoned on the map and the land area discussed in the Development Code text
amendment. The attached Planning Commission staff report dated July 10, 2002, contains
further detailed information (Exhibit "A").
Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the City
Council on October 17, 2001, for the 2001 General Plan Update. The subject Mixed Use land
use designations were analyzed by this EIR. The Development District Amendments and
Development Code Amendment are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to
California CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines
Section F(10).
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 500-foot radius of the project site. in addition, notices were mailed to those who signed
the petition to the City Council dated July 22, 2002.
At the July 10, 2002, Planning Commission meeting several homeowners from the single-family
neighborhood to the north of Area 2 (north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman and
Archibald Avenues) expressed concern about a potential affordable housing project in that area.
Staff clarified that no application for an affordable housing project has been submitted and that
the area is already designated for Mixed Use development and the proposed text amendment
would add limitation to the amount of residential development in the area. It sets a cap on the
total number of dwelling units consistent with the adopted General Plan. Staff expects the same
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DDA DRC2002-00446(A)(B)AND DCA DRC2002-00448
Augu~ 21,2002
Page 3
homeowners to express concerns at the City Council meeting on the amendment. Attached
(Exhibit "B") is a petition from the homeowners expressing concern about affordable housing.
The items indicated in the subject petition are addressed in Exhibit "B-I" attached hereto for
reference. Note that there is no application for affordable housing before the Council, only
Development Code and District Amendments to make the Code consistent with the General Plan.
Since the area in which an affordable housing project may be developed is already designated
Mixed Use, the amendments before the City Council do not facilitate this potential development.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BL/jc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 10, 2002
Exhibit "B" Petition from homeowners
Exhibit"B-1" - Responseto homeowners petition
Planning Commission Resolutions 02-68, 02-69, and 02-70
Ordinance Approving DRC2002-00446A
Ordinance Approving DRC2002-00446B
Ordinance Approving DRC2002-00448
177
THE CITY OF
]~AN C H 0 C U £AH 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: July 10, 2002
TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development Code to add text provisions for
Mixed Use development for two areas; Area One located on the north and south
sides of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the abandoned Southern
Pacific Railroad corridor (trestle) also known as the "Bear Gulch Area," and Area ,
Two, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and '
Hellman Avenue both as part of Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development District Map to change the land
use designations from General Commemial, Community Commercial, Office, Office
Park, and Specialty Commercial, to Mixed Use for 55 acres of land located on the
north and south sides of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the
abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad corridor (trestle) also known as the "Bear
Gulch Area," as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program - APN:
207-011-33, 35, 36, 43, 44, and 45; 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, and 41; 207-111-01,
02, 05 thru 17 and 23, 207-112-03, thru 06, 09 thru 11, 13 thru 16, 20 and21;
207-113-01 thru 18, and 23 thru 25; 207-123-33, and 34; 207-571-75 thru 78.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Development District Map to change the land
use designations from Community Commercial, Specialty Commercial, and Utility to
Mixed Use for 10 acres of land at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Archibald Avenue as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program -
APN: 208-151-01, 14 thru16, and 19, and portions of 20 thru 22; 208-152-06, 07, 09
thru 12, 14, 16 thru 22; 208-153-01 thru 05, and 08 thru 23.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Backqround: The City Council adopted the updated General Plan in October of 2001. The
update includes provisions for mixed-use development in the above referenced areas. There
are also provisions for the proportions or percentages of different uses within the land use
"mixture." Therefore, there are two types of amendments before the Planning Commission;
one being an amendment to the Development District Map to specify the two areas along
Foothill Boulevard as Mixed Use instead of General Commercial, Community Commemial,
2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCADRC2002-00448 AND DDADRC2002-00446
JULY 10, 2002
Page 2
Office, Office Park, and Specialty Commercial as currently shown. The other is a text
amendment to the Development Code to add the use percentage and intensity provisions for
Mixed Use areas per the General Plan. Together, these amendments will provide consistency
with the General Plan as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program.
B. Project Density: The request proposes to change approximately 55 acres in the Bear Gulch
area presently designated Specialty Commercial, Community Commercial, Office, and Office
Park and 10 acres at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue
presently designated Specialty Commercial, Community Commercial, and Utility to the Mixed
Use designation. The amendments are necessary to bring the Development District Map and
the Development Code into conformance with the updated General Plan. Note that the
General Plan has mixed use provisions for 37.5 acres on the north side of Foothill Boulevard
between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue. The Development Districts Map already
shows a majority of this area as Mixed Use. Only 10 of the 37.5 acres in this vicinity are not
yet shown as Mixed Use on the Map and therefore need to be changed. The Development
Code however does not currently include the land use percentages for the entire 37.5 acres,
hence the discrepancy between the land area being rezoned on the map and the land area
discussed in the Development Code text amendment.
C. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq:
Area 1 (Bear Gulch):
North - Red Hill Golf Course, Multi-family homes, Single-family homes; Medium Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - Multi-family homes and Single-family homes; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
East Vacant land and Albertson's shopping center; Office/Professional and Community
Commercial
West Shopping centers in the City of Upland
Area 2 (Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue):
North - Single-family homes; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South - Restaurant, Liquor store, In-line retail; Specialty Commercial and Community
Commercial
East Miller's Outpost Center; Community Commercial
West Single-family homes, Various commemial uses; Mixed Use retail
D. General Plan Desiqnations:
Area One (Bear Gulch):
Project Site - Mixed Use
North Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre)
South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre)
East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)
West City of Upland
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCADRC2002-00448 AND DDADRC2002-00446
JULY 10, 2002
Page 3
Area 2 (Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue):
Project Site - Mixed Use
North Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
South- Commercial
East Commercial
West Commercial
E. Site Characteristics: The properties are level with a slight grade to the south. The Bear Gulch
site contains various existing structures such as the Chavin Storage and Office development
at the southeast corner of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard, notable local
restaurants such as the Sycamore Inn (Historic Point of Interest), the Magic Lamp (Historic
Landmark), and Vince's. The Red Chief Motel and a concrete lined flood control basin are
also on the site. The Hellman/Archibald site contains several single-family homes, some of
which are converted to commercial use.
ANALYSIS:
A. General:
Area 1 (Bear Gulch): According to the General Plan, this entrance to the City from the west is
part of an important historical heritage that has not been able to compete successfully in the
marketplace. The intent for the Bear Gulch area is to achieve:
1. A dynamic entrance to the City that reflects and sustains the historic character
represented by a few existing structures in the area; and
2. A "target district" that attracts specialty businesses and is attractive to both local
residents and visitors to the community; and
3. A significant example of the historic Route 66 theme to exemplify the important role of
the Rancho Cucamonga area during that historic era; and
4. A sustainable economic vitality.
The primary but not exclusive proposed uses are retail and service commemial serving the
Red Hill and Bear Gulch neighborhoods as well as selective markets on a more regional
scale, such as tourist related commercial. This area has served as a "dinnerhouse" district, a
certainly desirable role to continue as exemplified by the Sycamore Inn and the Magic Lamp
restaurants. However, there is not enough current vitality to the area to sustain that specialty.
By allowing a mix of commercial, tourist commercial, office, and residential development with
somewhat greater intensities than currently prevail, the possibility exists to generate
investment interest in this area. Office development is proposed as a means of achieving
some level of daytime and early evening population in the area.
Residential development should be multi-family condominium and apartment types to
energize the district during day and evening business hours. Staff has had discussions with
developers interested in senior housing development in this area.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCADRC2002-00448 AND DDADRC2002-00446
JULY 10, 2002
Page 4
The following table specifies the uses and the range of development for each classification.
The use categories are broad to allow for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to
the market. This table would be added to Development Code Section 17.32.020 (C-3)
regarding mixed use development in the Foothill Boulevard corridor.
LAND USE PERCENT RANGE *ACREAGE RANGE
*DENSITY (du/ACRE)
*DWELLING UNITS
COMMERCIAL - Retail, Service 50% to 70% 27.5 to 38.5 acres
Commercial, Tourist Commemial
Office (commercial and
professional)
RESIDENTIAL 40% to 60% 16.5 to 27.5 acres @ 14
du/ac~
231 to 385 du
TOTALS 100% 55 ACRES
~ Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac as
long as the total of 385 dwelling units is not exceeded.
Area 2 (North side of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue):
According to the General Plan, this stretch of small properties along the north side of Foothill
Boulevard that need revitalization can create, either individually or through land assembly, a
renewed vigor for this portion of the City. The Mixed Use designation will facilitate the reuse
of challenging parcel sizes and dimensions through flexibility in site planning and use
configuration. The intent is to achieve:
1. A revitalized mini-district" that has unique appeal to residents and visitors;
2. An intimate, walkable character with an interesting mix of businesses integrated with
residential; and
3. A distinct appearance and ambiance that sets the area apart from other portions of
Foothill Boulevard; and
4. A small, but distinct complex of multi-family housing that gives the neighborhood a
permanent residential anchor.
The primary but not exclusive use is retail and service commercial. Higher intensity
development is intended to occur at the corners of Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue
where they intersect Foothill Boulevard. Retail uses may be combined with office uses to
achieve multiple story buildings. The clustering of buildings is desirable, along with shared
parking facilities. The overall design should provide a pedestrian ambiance that is distinct
from the surrounding auto-oriented commercial development.
Residential development is to be an integral part of this mixed-use area. A range of housing
types is envisioned, including multiple family condominiums or apartments, as well as home
studios or lofts. The inclusion of home enterprise uses may involve more activity than typical
home occupations, but will still possess a fundamentally residential character. The creative
integration of residential development will add variety and ongoing activity along this segment
of Foothill Boulevard.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCADRC2002-00448 AND DDADRC2002-00446
JULY 10, 2002
Page 5
The following table specifies the uses and the range of development for each classification.
The use categories are broad to allow for a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness to the
market. This table would be added to Development Code Section 17.32.020 (C~3) regarding
mixed use development in the Foothill Boulevard corridor.
LAND USE PERCENT RANGE *ACREAGE RANGE
*DENSITY (du/ACRE)
*DWELLING UNITS
COMMERCIAL - Retail, Service 40% to 60% 15 to 22.5 acres
Commercial, Office (commercial
and professional), Home Enterprise,
and Tourist Commercial
RESIDENTIAL 40% to 60% 15 to 22.5 acres @ 14 du/~
210 to 315 du
TOTALS 100% 37.5 ACRES
~ Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac
long as the total of 315 dwelling units is not exceeded.
B. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report was certified by the City
Council on October 17, 2001, for the 2001 General Plan Update. The subject Mixed Use land
use designations were analyzed by this EIR. The Development District Amendments and
Development Code Amendment are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to
California CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines
Section F(10).
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 500-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Development Code Amendment and
Development District Amendments and that they be forwarded to the City Council for final action.
City Planner
BB:BLC:Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Area I (Bear Gulch) Maps
Exhibit "B" - Area II Maps
Exhibit "C" - Text Amendment
Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2002-00448
Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2002-00446A
Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2002-00446B
AREA I -- BEAR GULCH
N
EXHIBIT "A"
AREA 1 - BEAR GULCH
EXISTING DISTRICT MAP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
!
!
EXHIBIT "Al" ~
AREA TWO
m
N
EXHIBIT '"~" '~~~
AREA 2
EXISTING DISTRICT MAP
EXHIBIT "B1"
Section 17.32.020 - Foothill Boulevard Districts (underline = added text; clouding = new
tables)
C. Office. There are three types of office land use categories located within the Foothill
Boulevard corridor designed to provide varying levels of office-related services. These
three office land use districts include: office, commercial/office and mixed use.
1. Office (FB/O) land use district is intended to accommodate
professional/administrative office and personnel services as opposed to other
commercial-oriented land uses. Typically, uses consist of executive, management,
administrative or clerical uses including the establishment of branch offices, data
processing centers, and the provision of consultation establishments of a
professional nature.
2. Commercial/office (FB/CO) land uses consist of activities which cater to business
support and personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care
clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land
uses.
3. Mixed Use (FB/MU) activities consist primarily of a mix of Medium Residential
uses, coupled with the establishment of re,qional and convenience-oriented sales
and services. Typically, uses include Medium Residential land uses of 8-14
dwelling units per acre, reqional commercial, and neighborhood oriented
community commercial uses such as retail sales from the premises of frequently
needed personal items (i.e.: dry cleaning establishments, specialty markets, video
rental outlets, cafes, sit down restaurants, book/magazine stores, hair stylists,
etc.). The land use cate,qories are broad to allow for a h~qh de,qree of flexibility and
responsiveness to the market. Each Mixed-Use/Retail site shall provide a master
plan illustrating land use, site planning, circulation, access, and overall
architectural and landscape architectural design concepts (see Section 17.32.030
- Use Regulations).
The following tables specify the uses and the ren,qe of development for each classification for the
Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area and the area on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between
Hellman Avenue and Achibald Avenue:
Area 1-Bear Gulch
i LAND USE PERCENT RANGE *ACREAGE RANGE
*DENSITY (dulACRE)
*DWELLING UNITS
COMMERCIAL - Retail, 50% to 70% 27.5 to 38.5 acres
Service Commercial, Tourist
Commercial, Office
(commerciaJ and professional)
RESIDENTIAL 30% to 50% 16.5 to 27.5 acres @ 14
du/ac1
231 to 385 du
TOTALS 100% 55 acres
~ Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac as
long as the total of 385 dwellin~l units is not exceeded.
EXHIBIT "C" - TEXT AMENDMENT
Area 2- North side of Foothill Boulevard between Heilman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
LAND USE PERCENT RANGE *ACREAGE RANGE
*DENSITY (du/ACRE)
*DWELLING UNITS
COMMERCIAL - Retail, 40% to 60% 15 to 22.5 acres
Service Commercial, Office
(commercial and professional),
Home Enterprise, and Tourist
Commercial
RESIDENTIAL 40%to60% 15 to 22.5 acres @ 14
du/ac~
210 to 315 du
TOTALS 100% 37.5 acres
~ Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac as
long as the total of 315 dweliin~l units is not exceeded.
EXHIBIT "C" - TEXT AMENDMENT
July 22, 2002 RE. OEN£D
RANCHO cUCAMONGA
Mayor Alexander O~f OW CI"P~ CLERK
City Council
Planning Commission
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Dear Mayor Alexander, Council Members and the Planning Commission,
This letter is an appeal fi.om the community of Rancho Cucamonga near Foothill Blvd
and Archibald Avenue. The appeal is in regards to the recommendation made on the tenth
of July 2002 by the planning commission in regards to the properties referred to as
DRC2002-00446B - City of Rancho Cucamonga (ten acres of land at the North West
comer of Foothill Blvd. and Archibald Avenue as phase II of the general plan consistency
program).
A number of community members expressed their concerns at the July 10th planning
commission meeting. The items of concern are as follows:
· Designating this land to mixed use would allow high density residential housing
to be placed at these properties, increasing the amount of violent crimes
· Current school district facilities would not be able to accommodate the increase in
student population growth
· Property value would be negatively affected
· Additional ~'affic that would add to the existing congestion problem
We have investigated and discovered Congressi~hal findings that report that
neighborhoods with government assisted, affordable income housing have an increase in ·
drag-related, violent crimes. These types of crime lead to murders, muggings and
additional forms of violence against residents in and near th~se types of housing. There
is evidence that Government agencies often do not have the funding available to help the
city government in fighting the crimes we have referred to.
We understand there has been a study done by our school district that shows the 230 units
they are currently proposing would increase the student population by 60-80 students.
We don't feel that number is accurate. Considering the type of housing (as many as 350
units) we feel the increase of students would be closer to three to four hundred. We
believe the estimate of sixty to eighty students is extremely conservative and should be
further investigated by the school district and city planning commission.
We have also found studies that show dramatic decreases, as much as 25%, in residential
property values within 2000 feet of high density housing. These percentages of
devaluating residential properties increase over five years.
Anyone who commutes along Foothill Blvd. between Grove Avenue and Haven Ave.
knows there is already an existing traffic congestion problem. San Bemardino Rd.
between Vineyard Avenue and Archibald Avenue has had a dramatic increase in
speeding traffic with the businesses built over the last few years. This has created a great
danger to pedestrians and neighborhood children that commute along San Bemardino Rd.
Most certainly a high density housing project would only add to the already existing
traffic problems.
As a commtmity we understand there is a need for affordable housing in our area. Our
recommendation would be to offer medium density residential housing such as affordable
condominiums, active adult or senior citizen housing. We would like to be part of the
decision process determining the use of this land. Please keep us informed of the
progress. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
The Nei
Community information can be distributed through--
Darreld Van Westrienen at 909-980-5948, 909-833-8622
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San .Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit loW income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
Address
2. N~e
Address
3. Nme
4. Nme
Address~
6. Nme
Address
~8. Nme
Address
25/
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighborhood
Please helpto stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers ~want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name q'eres~,, ¢~%tsignature
Address
2. Name ~'~
3. Nme /~a~X) ~,'.4~si~amre
Address ~0q~
- ' si~amre
/
Address
Name -:d~'~ ~' '~ ae' signature
Address ~"~ ~:", ~n0~¢.,~ C_~.~ ~c.~,~- ~'~ ~.~"~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighb°rhood
PleaSe help to stop the development of the land. on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a'230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
Addres
2. Name
Address
3. Nme ~q
5. Nme
Address
6. Nme
7. Nme
Address _~
8. Nme
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help' to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
'Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
'
signat
1. Name
Address c(~sg ~)qe,4~. J~,'~
2. Name (~ ~ }/~ ~Ct'x ( signatur~ (~ ·
3. NameT~
^ddress
4. Nme ~~~h~
5. Nme &a~ ¢~d si~ature
6. Nme ~,.~
Address ~V;~/
Address ~
8. Nam ~ si~amre
Address ¢&~,--
29q
.' Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our.Neighborhood
Please helpto stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low'income apartment
· complex at this site...
1. Name
Address
2. Nme ~
Address
3. Name Do>4,o /g~o~/,,,,o signature
5. Nme
Address ~
Address
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low tncome apartment
complex at this site...
' 1. Name ~;z/£~-L-TO/(J
Address 7~ q
2. N~e~0,wq L, ~ ~ ( ~ si~am~e
AddressT
3. Nme ~a~2 ~ ~ ~/~n~ s~ature
Address C~YJ
'4. Nme r-~m~ si~ature
Address Cq
5. N~e ~,~
Address 77,~ / ~ ~,~·'
6..Nme ~ /~~ s~mure
Address 77~
7. Name ~~ ~~'~ si~amre
Address %v~
si atu e
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help.to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ~~*-- signa~
Address
2. Name ~'",~.~.~.,/..~t ~ot~r~ signature
Address q~6
3. Nme
Address
Address ~1
5. Nme~ si~ature ~
Address
6. Nme
Address ~
7. N~e gcen~ ~arnB si~amre
Address
8. Nme~ si~a~re
Address~~o~ ~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
· Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
Address
Address
3. Nme
Address
4. Nme
Address
6. Name h?_3o_Le
Address 77P7
7. Nme
Address
8. Nme,
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our.Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers.want to build a 23.0 unit'low income apartment
complex at this site...'
1. Name ,_-::~:: :~, ,,, ~: ' signaturx¢~':-' -5---'
Address
2. N~e ~,~: .>-¢>~ ' sl~ature -,-
Address 5~
4. Nme
Address ~:>q & /:,':s/C ~:'~:~~ ....
5. Nme c_/qwr,V/ Sr~.:~l:~ si~ature. , ., ·
6. Nme
Address
7. Nme c~c.~,.~.., ~. signature., . . . .
... . .~ [:.,.. ,..
Address ,
8. Name (}e~S' ~::.~c~.t:5~ignature ·
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our. Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers. want to build a 230 unit iow income apartment
complex at this site ....
1. Name ~fx~t- ~ ,' signature
2. Name ~0A~ ~4~ff,4~ signature
Address __ _ .. ' '
Address c?¢b:' ,~-f~,, ~t, ~0.C..
7. N~e ? ; :~":." signature
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
3. Name ~4//~ /g/'///r~' A/ signature
4. Name ~ J-e'~jr~. ~r~ si~amre~~~~
Address
5. Nme ~a~u
Address x0~
6. Nme ~/~ ff~/ si~atur~
Address
7. Nme
Address ~oCb
Address 20~
3o/
Do. Not Let DevelOpers Ruin.our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the' development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers.want'to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address .~r~,~
2. Nme ~ (A~12,~e~ ~h si~atur~~
Address ~37~
3. N~~/~~~ '~ ·
Address ,~~~~' si'~m~'
ddress ¢ :4 si amr .
Addressee
Ad~ess~
7.' Nme si~ature '
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our:Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers wantto build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at/his site... ,
1. N me
Address
' Address~
4. Nme
'Address
Address
8. Name
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our. Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want.to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
Address ~~ ~~x~
Address~~
Address
4. Nm~.~
Ad&es~q~
5. Nme
Address
Ad.ess [
7. Nme
Address ¢., ~ ~.~~
8. Nme
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Out Neighborhood
· Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino,Rd between Archib,ald and Hellman Ave.
Developers..want'to build a 230 unit loTM
income apartment
complex at this site... ,.~
'1. Name 2%v,~, L~. signature '..
Address q%q
Address ~
6. Name ,Do~ &~_e. .signature~ ~~)~
Address
7.' Name LI rE,,.~ ~fi,,~-e.,r signatur~
Address
8. Name ~BtX
Address
Name j)D/J~/_/¢~ //V.//Jif: ' signature
Address 577 70/-,4)rT'dA/~7--
AddressTq/qFJ X~'~-/~ ' ~ 2~~
Address 5f~ /-~i]~--~9. ~ ~
Name./~.C/,T~' ~-)~ "" signature
Address~O ~, ~ ¢ ~
Name ~q /~7//O/~ signamre~~
Address '2~'-70~.~/ .x.~.~,~
Name /~q~o ~o~ r//~o si~amre
Address q~9 c~t~t gr. ~/~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers. want to build a 230 unit~ low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address ~doc~ /%'(.
2. Name"L'%5 6~,~
3. Name ~q:~rC~t. s!gnamre ' ,.
5. Nme~¢~XqG ~ ~ si~amr~
Address ~3)% B~
6. N~e W~ ~0~¢ si~ature
' ' ure ) -
Address ~4~ ~,:¢~ ~
8. N~e ..~,~ ~ signature ~
Addre~~~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers ,want to build a 230 unit low income aPartment'
complex at this site...
2. Nme
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman'Ave.
Developers, want to build a 230 unit' low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address
2. Name
Address
4. Nme
Address
e
6. N~
Address
Aaar ss
DO Not Let Developers Ruin' Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
Address
2. Name
Address ?;02q
3. Name
Address ~3~
Address
x ~
Address
8.
Address ~4
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to. build a 230 unit 10w income apartment
complex,at this site...
2. Name
Address
3. Name
Address
Address
Address
AddressTh~s~
7. Nme
8. Nme
Address ~q¢~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the' development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unif low income aPartment'
complex at this site ......
1. Name
Address
2. Name
Address
Address
7. N~e
Address
Address
"~. Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighb°rho°d
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
~1. Name 13h(,~vu'\ (
.2. Nme ~ si~amre
Address
3. Name ~l&~/uta. [lc~,t~_v~ signature
Address q~ T~ ~ ~r~ ~'/~~
'4. N~e ~,~ ~.~ si~~
Address q55~-~ .
Address 9~v~' C,~c~ sr ,
6. Nme~ si~a~e,~
Ad,ess
7. Nme ~ silage
Address ~~
Address g~'7q' g~m[o~~
DO Not Let Developers Ruin Our'Neighborhood ·
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardin0 Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave. -
Developers want.to'build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name~' c i<~-: ~'-V- signature
Address 2 qS~ ~-~
7. Name ~ C~ si~ature
8. Nme si~amre
Address
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
' 1. Name ~r~~ signature
Address 7~2~'0
Address
3. Nme ~mold '~ ~s¢r,~amre ~ , / / .'
Address ~KD~ ~X~ ~. ~ ql 7J~
4. Nme s4(e amre .
Address ~%&~
5. Nme ~~,o ~& si~atur~~
Address
6. Nme si~ature
Address
7. Name signature
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our. Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address ?~.3.S ,,~,~/o,.x:: ,sT"-. .~//Z_ ~ ~ ..
2. N~e ~ ' ~~
Address ¢~ ~/~//~' ,~~ '
3. N~~ z/ ~~i~amre ~ ., -~ /~
4. Nme ~/d_ C. ~~si~a~e ~
Address?5~~~
6. Name signature
Address
7. Name signature
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between. Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers vqant to build a 230 unit low income apartment'
complex at this site...
1. Name ,~[~q~.~l.~c~ ~-~..~'-/ signature
Address
2. Name
Address
3. Nme
Address 7~
4. Nme ~d
Address 7~vff
/
5. Nme si~ature
Addres~
6. Name signature
Address
7. Name signature
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin Our NeighbOrhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a.230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ,~oL- k.O~ta fi- -~ ~-_.signature//
Address ?~,~
2. Name []:~taule
3. Nme si~amre
Address
4. Nme si~amre
Address
5. Name signature
Address
6. Name signature
Address
7. Name signature
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin Our NeighbOrhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
signature
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman.Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
'1. Name~5/CW ,{9 ~ WT~ 4 ¢ 7¢ ~[ sign
e f
Address 5r~-c/O L.~v ~
Address ~7/O Z¥~ ~ .
Address 7Offq ~¥m s3. // _
8 Nam ' ' I si~am
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land.on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers.want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ,,~'~,.~ ,-;, ''~ '"' ·
Address ~,',.'~
d,~ ~. ,- ~//~;'-,~'"~, /.\ ,/ /?/' ~';-~,:;C "~-t-'.
.... ' -/ (.~'"'-""~ .. '' --7 ..... L',/ '
2. Name 'rVq,~-,-i< k~.- i.----,- signature
Address
5. Name ~:~-:,:>~- .-~ ~:.~_;/,~T~. signature
Address ~-.~:~:~ ---~',-,"",' -~ ~.'~; ~- ~'~ ~%~: ~
6. Name ~.~-,: ~:;x~z/;- signature
Address :.' ""'~' '-~:'~'-'-'?*~,'~" ' (~_ ~'~"
7. Name k',,--,../"'~' ,~-._ ~..,:?.r,%t'---.". signature .;
Address ¥ p ;~:~ '--'" -' ~-
·/ ~..~2~.. "--: /f~:/ :.-' ~ --- ' ............
8. Name Z'...,..:::,-;~.,~ ,~-' C..~.-; ,,.,- signature ..........
Address ;:' - - " /.:- -'
Do Not Let DeveloPers Ruin OurNeighb0rhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers .want'to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1 Name
Address
2. Name
Address
5. Nme
6. Nme
Address
7. Nme
Address
8. Nme
Address
:32 2_.
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our. Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers .wantm build a 230 unit 'low income apartment
complex at this site... . ..
Address ~.-~"~ ~~ .' / ~ ~x~_, .~ ~--
2. Name ~~/_.~._- .... s~gnatu,r~
Address ? ?ys~z//.. -/.~ .~/
3. Nme ~t&g : '
~A~ . si,~amre~ .
Address 7,vr/-Z~
4. Nme
Addres ~qq~ ~
Address
6.
ddre sq
Addressqq3O
Address 7q~d
323
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our. Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers,want,to build a 230 unit~low income apartment ·
comple, x at this site...
Address~33h'
Address
3. Nme
Address
5. Nme
Address
7. Nme
Address
8. Nme
Address~)
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood ,.
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers ,want to build a 230 unit 'low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address 10065'
Address ~ff~O {~[](~
Address ~
325
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardi,,no Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers ,whnt.to build a 230 unit 'low income apartment
complex at this site... ,, ,'
Address
3. Nme
Address
Address
Address
8. Nme
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers .wantto build a 230 unit' low income apartment
complex at this site... ,
1. Name
Address
Address
3. Nme
Address I~
4. Nme
Address
Address
Address } )Cg~,q
7. Nme
Do Not Let Developers .Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers .want to build a 230 unit' low income apartment
complex at this site... ,
1. Name ~...~(; ~~
Address
2. Nme
Address¢~,~
3. Nme
Address ~l~h~
4. Nme
Address
5. Nme
Address
6. Nm~ ~
Address
Address
Addres~'~5~
Do Not Let Developers, .Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
'gna~
1. Name~--~5 /¢;o_~z,~F_:~5 s~
Address '7_~qO Axe~tc,~ P3~..
2. Name ~ 0~,/~- g-F~ ¢/i~-/' ~(~/d signamr~., ~7 ?L~
Address 1~2/ ~ 3 ~_ ,4-.:r~ Lo,~ N~.r-A4~.~''6~
3. Name
Address
4. Nme
Address
Address
Address
Address
8. Nme
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between. Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers .want to build a 230 unit low income apartment'
complex at this site...
1. Name
'_, '/.) ' ~/?$?,./ .--
Address ¢,~q
3. Name ~~. G,~-(,.,. s , s~.gnature,~. ~. r') .,,
Address
4. 'Name ~~ .0,¢,,~'.~,L,, signature
signatur,,
Address [ tb-~-5-t5/v/4~ /%;~/iCvC~. ~_~.//Q ~_ ..........
6. Narfie 5¥'~\c,.~ ~,x"¢ L. signatur
Address '~_q % K\~,.r,, ~,-3c~-r A.
7. Name ~. ~3 ~\e. t_~,l .i;~.,~,~ signature
8. Name ~r2 .~¥/~-n,~ signature ~__A~~ ~.
Address ~/
Z3b
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and'Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ~'~X'xX'/'xX,~6X~-~XX~kCCiignature
A d d r e s S~x~ ~?_~~-~_~
slgnatur
Address 7~'2F¢/,~ ~ Y~. -
3. Name
Address '~%¼~
4. Name
AddressClZLC~' .-~,.
Address ~7
7. Name ¢~ ~t( si~ature~~~
Address Gq
8. Name~~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers,want to build a 230 unit'low income apartment
comple, x at this site... ~
2. Name~p),%/~ U ~:,~ ~Cc, n ~ si~a~re
0 '
3. Nme~2,¢.~ ~~ si~amre
Address
Address
8. N~e ~ ~~ signature ~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please 'help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers,want~to build a 230 unit ~low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name l~t~X°-.~O ~'~'J ~k. ~ signature
Address qb-'x-13 ',~},hI~TH'~-[
2. Name ..~ ;,~ nC r,,; ~ ~- signatur _'"--r-.~ a
Address '~5'65- ~..-.~.l~:~t- fief
Address
.... :
5. Nme 2 t~ Ba ~,~r . . signature
6. Narr/e 9c~x~ g ~o_~ signature~ ~
Address ~' ~'~ q ~c_~v~
7. Nme ~z~m
Address v~-~ ~--r~r~
8. Name ~~~~ signatur
Address/~'/~ ~/~0~
333
Do Not Let Developers. Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ~t~
2. N~e ,~e~ ~ ~;o~ ~ ¢ signature
Address
Address,~ ~4 [ ~ ~ ~
Addt~ss~~'
'5. Nme ~~. ~O~ si~amre~
Add~ess ~
6.
Address
Address
8. Nme
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighborhood ,, ..~
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers,want'to build a 230 unit low income apartment '
complex at this site... ,~
1. Name
Address
Address
4. Nme ~.~
Address
5. Nme
AdaressQ~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers ,wantto build a 230 unit iow income apartment
complex at this site... ,
1. Name
Address
2. Nme
Address
Address
4. Nme
Address
5. Name , signature
Address
6. Name signature
Address
7. Name signature
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
cOmplex at this site...
Address~01¢ ~5~
2. Name signature
Address
3. Name signature
Address
4. Name signature
Address
5. Name signature
Address
6. Narrie signature
Address
7. Name signature
Address
8. Name signature
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help,to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers.want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
2. Name ~~.-~[ s,gnatu~
~'\ , ~ ~ ·
Address ~O~
3. N~e (~ll~,q~,F~ si'~a~re~
Address ~¢~-~ ' ~-. '
4.
Address ·
Address
.... si~ature_
6. Nme~(nm~
7. Nme ~im.
8. Nam~ ~.i~amre
· Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help'to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ~~~(~~ ature ]]/,o'. /
Addres~'~'_.
2. Name TT~ Td_,~J~,:,4' · signature .
Address "lt;~,~ ~6V~,t~'L ~,.
3. Name (~jvl?(~txx~ ~?l~t ~ s,~amre ~..
Address ~ ~~
4. Nme ~0~,~ ~oJ~v~ si~amre
Address ~~
5. N,~~ si~atu~
Address
6. Nme ~K~ ~~A~si~ature~t///~
Address~ffg ~/ lA V~o
7. Nm~,~t ~ ~x~ si~ature ~~
Address q~ ~g~'3 ~
8. Nme ~?~. gS4u~U~, si~amre
Address 'q ~ ~ ¢' ~ ~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin OurNeighborhood .'
Please help'to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers :want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ~pxejoe&2a
Address
2. Nme
Address
3. Nme
4. Nme
ad ess
~ddress
6. Nme
Address
7. Nme
Address
~ddress~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help.to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address 7 ~'~ ~ {-~7,'~--
2. Name -~at~.-{-'Z,/~_-/~ signature
Address 7b % ~.~ 54.
Address~g~ ~~ -~ ~C'
4. Nme ~~amre ~
5. Nme ~ ~ ~ si~amre
Address ~ ~
Address 7~ Z~ 5~.
7. Name~t~ Ih ~q~' si~amrc~~ _
Address ~/~ z~ ~.
8. N~e c~rt~/,FL t 5. Qi~,>_si~amre
Address ~ L~' ¢~
~ Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our. Neighborhood
Please help,to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address'-/C'3C
2. Name-.
Address : -~
3. Name ~~
Address
4. Nme ,ff~tgag
Address ~~
5. Nme g0e~
Address
6. Nme ~4
AddressT~
7. Nme ~
Address_Tbnh
8.
Name
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our, Neighborhood
Please help to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
Address
2. Nam~¢~t~
Address ~
3. Nme
Address
Address
5. Nme
Address
6. Nme
Address
7. Nme
Address
Address
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please helpto stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name ~qo~M
Address
2. Nme
Address
3. Nme
Address ~tD
~ ~}/ ' ' ' re
Address
5. Nme ~ ~~~ si~ature
Address
Address q
8. Nme
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help. to stop the development of the land on
San Bernardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. Name
Address
2. N~e
Address
3. Nme~.~~~~,
Address
Address
5. Nme
6. Name Ck~,'-~¢,'~,o_ ~4,r~o~ signature
Address
7. N~e /~e /~oy~~ si~ature "-
~ddre~s 7X, Z~,~, X~ ~. ~'~~
N~e ~~/, ~~x~ ~amre
8.
Address ~5~:~/~/~
Do Not Let Developers Ruin Our Neighborhood
Please help. to stop the development of the land on
San Bemardino Rd between Archibald and Hellman Ave.
'Developers want to build a 230 unit low income apartment
complex at this site...
1. NameS;~pz~/¥ /4~TtgA0s-?~/signature~ /
Address 7~¢~ [Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2. Nam~F~m~..~~xW~,s~gnmure ~
Address 7~ Z~ ~V~
3. Nme~2~o~' ~T~xmT~ s~amre
Address~4 d~ m ~ .--:
Address ~5~ 1~5~
Address ~ ~~ ~ ~~
6. N~e Zf~ s~atur
8. Nm~~~: c N sl~amre
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT B-1
DDA DRC2002-00446(A)(B) AND DCA DRC2002-00448
August 21, 2002
The following responses will be in italics after each of the four areas of concern in the
appeal letter:
· Designating this land to mixed use would allow high density residential housing
to be placed at these properties, increasing the amount of violent crimes
The overall land use dwelling unit yield is the same as the previous General Plan and
the 2001 General Plan Update. Neither of these documents nor the proposed
Development District Amendment will allow for High Density Housing as defined in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. No density increases are proposed in this application
therefore it is not anticipated that there will be any significant difference in crime
occurrences than in any other similar land use pattern that has occurred generally
throughout the City.
· Current school district facilities would not be able to accommodate the increase
in student population growth...
The Development District Amendment is consistent with the 2001 General Plan Update
and Environmental Impact Report. The Draft 2001 General Plan Update and EIR were
circulated to all appropriate agencies including school districts and there has never
been an indication that the School Districts will not be able to handle school population
growth. In any event the State has effectively through legislative actions precluded local
jurisdictions'from considering school impacts because of residential development.
· Property value would be negatively affected
There has not been any empirical or visual evidence generated in Rancho Cucamonga
that multi-family development in Rancho Cucamonga negatively impacts property
values; to the contrary, neighborhoods in many other parts of the City have these uses
in proximity to each other without any evidence of negative effects to property value.
· Additional traffic that would add to the existing congestion problem
The overall land use dwelling unit yield is the same as the previous General Plan and
the 2001 General Plan Update. Neither of these documents not the proposed
Development District Amendment will allow for High Density Housing as defined in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. No density increases are proposed in this zone change,
therefore it is not anticipated that there will be any significant difference in traffic impacts
than in any other similar land use patterns that has occurred generally through out the
City.
EXHIBIT B-1
RESPONSE TO CONCERNS EXPRESSED IN APPEAL LETTER DATED
2oo ,
RESOLUTION NO. 02-68
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 TO ADD TEXT
PROVISIONS FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT FOR TWO AREAS; AREA
ONE, APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND
SOUTH SIDES OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE
AND THE ABANDONED SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORRIDOR
(TRESTLE) ALSO KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA"; AND AREA
TWO, APPROXIMATELY 37.5 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND
HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
No. DRC2002-00448 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga _as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng on July 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The proposed amendment is necessary to establish consistency between the
General Plan, which already designates the areas as Mixed Use including text provisions for land
use intensity and mixture, and the Development Code; and
d. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a General Law City;, therefore State Law requires
the City's General Plan and Development Code to be consistent.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-68
DCA DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 10, 2002
Page 2
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
's Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
4. Thl ........... , ,-,...~., ~,~ of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
compliance with the UalltOm a ~-nv rorlrllt~H[a
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that them is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(1>-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines Section F(10).
Furthermore, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update
in October of 2001, and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this C(~mmission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No.
DRC2002-00448 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 2002.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Lar~yu M~Niel, Chairma
ATTEST: ~ --
~"~l~rad B,~ecmtary~ ~
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the lOth day of July 2002, by the following vote-to-wit:
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-68
DCA DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 10, 2002
Page 3
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO
RESOLUTION NO. 02-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A, A REQUEST
TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND
USE DESIGNATIONS FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, OFFICE PARK, AND SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
TO MIXED USE FOR 55 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
AND SOUTH SIDES OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE
AVENUE AND THE ABANDONED SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
CORRIDOR (TRESTLE), ALSO KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA,"
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 207-011-33, 35,
36, 43, 44, AND 45; 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, AND 41; 207-111-01,02, 05
THRU 17, AND 23; 207-112-03, THRU 06, 09 THRU 11, 13 THRU 16, 20,
AND 21; 207-113-01 THRU 18, AND 23 THRU 25; 207-123-33 AND 34; 207-
571-75 THRU 78.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment
No. DRC2002-00446A, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on July 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 55 acres of land, located on both sides of
Foothill Boulevard between the abandoned railroad line (trestle) and Grove Avenue and consists of
vacant land, various restaurants, a mixed-use public storage and office complex, a gas station, and a
nightclub. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial, Community Commercial,
Office, Office Park, and Specialty Commercial; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is occupied by
condominiums and a golf course. The property to the west is in the City of Upland and is improved
with shopping centers. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) and Office Professional and is vacant with single-family condominiums under
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-69
DDA DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 10, 2002
Page 2
construction further to the east. The property to the south is designated Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is improved with
single-family homes and multi-family residential development; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment
nor the surrounding properties; and
¢. The proposed amendment is necessa~J to establish consistency between the
General Plan, which already designates the areas as Mixed Use including text provisions for land
use intensity and mixlure, and the Development Code; and
d. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a General Law City;, therefore State Law requires
the City's General Plan and Development Code to be consistent.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines Section F(10).
Furthermore, the City Council approved an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan
Update in October of 2001, and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment No.
DRC2002-00446A by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 2002.
pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
d 5.z
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-69
DDA DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 10, 2002
Page 3
/ ~ McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST: ~
I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of July 2002, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO
RESOLUTION NO. 02-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2002-00~,'!,SB REQUESTING
TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND
USE DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, SPECIALTY
COMMERCIAL, AND UTILITY TO MIXED USE FOR 10 ACRES OF LANDAT
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-
APN: 208-151-01, 14 THRU 16, AND 19, AND PORTIONS OF 20 THRU 22;
208-152-06, 07, 09 THRU 12, 14, AND 16 THRU 22; 208-153-01 THRU 05
AND 08 THRU 23.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Distdct Amendment
No. DRC2002-O0446B, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Distdct Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng on July 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 10 acres of land, located on the northwest
comer of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. Said property is currently designated as
Community Commercial, Specialty Commercial, and Utility; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre) and is occupied by single-family homes. The property to the west is
designated Mixed Use and is occupied by vadous non-conforming single-family homes and small
businesses. The properly to the east is designated community commercial and is occupied by a
shopping center (the Miller's Outpost Plaza). The property to the south is designated Specialty
Commercial and Community Commercial and is occupied by restaurants and offices.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-70
DDA DRC2002-00446B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 10, 2002
Page 2
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. The proposed amendment is necessary to establish consistency between the
General Plan, which already designates the areas as Mixed Use, including text provisions for land
use intensity and mixture, and the Development Code; and
d. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a General Law City;, therefore State Law requires
the City's General Plan and Development Code to be consistent.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines Section F(10).
Furthermore, the City Council approved an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan
Update in October of 2001, and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment No.
DRC2002-00446B by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS '10TH DAY OF JULY 2002.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A'CI'EST:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 02-70
DDA DRC2002-00446B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
July 10, 2002
Page 3
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of July 2002, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 TO ADD TEXT PROVISIONS FOR MIXED
USE DEVELOPMENT FOR TWO AREAS; AREA ONE, APPROXIMATELY
55 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND THE
ABANDONED SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORRIDOR (TRESTLE)
ALSO KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA;" AND AREA TWO,
APPROXIMATELY 37.5 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND
HELLMAN AVENUE.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRC2002-00448 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date and adopted Resolution No. 02-68, recommending approval of said application to the
City Council.
3. On the 21st day of August 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 21,2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The proposed amendment is necessary to establish consistency between the
General Plan, which already designates the areas as Mixed Use, including text provisions for land
use intensity and mixture, and the Development Code; and
d. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a General Law City; therefore, State Law
requires the City's General Plan and Development Code to be consistent.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 21,2002
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines Section F(10).
Furthermore, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update
in October of 2001, and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00448 by the adoption of
the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 21,2002
Page 3
Section 17.32.020c3 shall be amended as follows (added text is underlined and new tables
are clouded):
3. Mixed Use (FB/MU) activities consist primarily of a mix of Medium to Medium H~qh
Residential uses, coupled with the establishment of reqional and convenience-
oriented sales and services. Typically, uses include .Mcd!'Jm Multiple Family
Residential land use of 8-! 4 up to 20 dwelling units per acre developed subject to
the applicable density ranqe requirements per Development Code Section
17.08.040., reqional commercial, and ne ghborhood oriented community commercial
uses such as retail sales from the premises of frequently needed personal items (i.e.:
dry cleaning establishments, specialty markets, video rental outlets, cafes, sit down
restaurants, book/magazine stores, hair stylists, etc.). The land use cateqodes are
broad to allow for a hiqh deqree of flexibility and responsiveness to the market. Each
Mixed-Use/Retail site shalr provide a master plan illustrating land use, site planning,
circulation, access, and overall architectural and landscape architectural design
concepts (see Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations).
The following tables specify the uses and the range of development for each classification for the
Bear Gulch Mixed-Use area and the area on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman
Avenue and Archibald Avenue:
Area 1 -Bear Gulch
LAND USE PERCENT *ACREAGE RANGE
RANGE *DENSITY (du/ACRE)
*DWELLING UNITS
COMMERCIAL - Retail, 50% to 70% 27.5 to 38.5 acres
Service Commercial,
Tourist Commercial, Office
(commercial and
professional)
RESIDENTIAL 30%to50% 16.5 to 27.5 acres @ 14
du/ac~
231 to 385 du
TOTALS 100% 55 ACRES
~ Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac
as long as the total of 231 dwelling units is not exceeded.
Area 2 - North side of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
LAND USE PERCENT *ACREAGE RANGE
RANGE *DENSITY (du/ACRE)
*DWELLING UNITS
COMMERCIAL - Retail, 40% to 60% 15 to 22.5 acres
Service Commercial,
Office (commercial and
professional), Home
Enterprise, and Tourist
Commercial
RESIDENTIAL 40% to 80% 15 to 22.5 acres @ 14 du/ac~
210 to 315 du
TOTALS 100% 37.5 ACRES
~ Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac
as long as the total of 210 dwelling units is not exceeded[
EX,,B T "A" 35?
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2002-00446A AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO
CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM GENERAL
COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, OFFICE PARK,
AND SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR 55 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND THE ABANDONED
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORRIDOR (TRESTLE), ALSO KNOWN
AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA," AS PHASE II OF THE GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY PROGRAM - APN: 207-011-33, 35, 36, 43, 44, AND 45;
207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, AND 41; 207-111-01,02, 05 TH RU 17, AND 23;
207-112-03 THRU 06, 09 TH RU 11,13 THRU 16, 20, AND 21; 207-113-01
THRU 18, 23 THRU 25; 207-123-33, AND 34; 207-571-75 THRU 78.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment
DRC2002-00446A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date and adopted Resolution No. 02-89, recommending approval of said application to the
City Council.
3. On the 21st day of August, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 21,2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 55 acres of land, located on both sides of
Foothill Boulevard between the abandoned railroad line (trestle) and Grove Avenue, and consists of
vacant land, various restaurants, a mixed-use public storage and office complex, a gas station, and
a nightclub. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial, Office, Office Park,
Community Commercial, and Specialty Commercial; and
b. The properly to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and is occupied by
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 21,2002
Page 2
condominiums and a golf course. The property to the west is in the City of Upland and is improved
with shopping centers. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) and Office Professional and is vacant with single-family condominiums under
construction further to the east. The property to the south is designated Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is improved with
single-family homes and multi-family residential development.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines Section F(10).
Furthermore, the City Council approved an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan
Update in October of 2001, and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment DRC2002-00446A by the adoption
of the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 21,2002
Page 3
AREA ONE - BEAR GULCH
N
EXHIBIT "A" s
ORD,.^.CE.O. ;
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
DRC2002-00446B AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO
CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL, SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL, AND UTILITY TO MIXED USE
FOR 10 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHW EST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARDANDARCHIBALDAVENUE-APN: 208-151-01,14THRU16,
AND 19; 208-152-06, 07, 09 THRU 12, 14, 16 THRU 22; 208-153-01 TH RU
05, AND 08 THRU 23.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District Amendment
DRC2002-00446B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng
on that date and adopted Resolution No. 02-70, recommending approval of said application to the
City Council.
3. On the 21st day of August 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 21,2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 10 acres of land, located on the northwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. Said property is currently designated as
Community Commercial, Specialty Commercial, and Utility; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre) and is occupied by single-family homes. The property to the west is in the
designated Mixed Use and is occupied by various non-conforming single-family homes and small
businesses. The property to the east is designated Community Commercial and is occupied by a
shopping center (Miller's Outpost Plaza). The property to the south is designated Specialty
Commercial and Community Commercial, and is occupied by restaurants and offices.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA DRC2002-00446B- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August21,2002
Page 2
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA Guidelines Section F(10).
Furthermore, the City Council approved an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan
Update in October of 2001, and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment DRC2002-00446B by the adoption
of the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
T H C I T Y 0 F
~ANCIIO CUCAMONGA
Memorandum
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manag~
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engin~ie/f.-~'./~,-
BY: Maria E. Perez, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: CFD 01-01, Peirotti Eminent Domain Resolution of Necessity -
agendized as item number D-5
The subject item was inadvertently placed on the consent calendar as Item D-5. It
should be agendized as Item G-l, a non advertised public hearing.
Additionally, relative to the subject project, the City Clerk received a letter from
Charles S. Krolikowski, Counsel for the Pierotti's in protest of the Eminent Domain
action along Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, as it relates to the
development of the infrastructure for Community Facilities District 2001-01.
They have requested that the letter be acknowledged in the public record.
cc: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager
llh4Oam Frora-PALt,tlERI,TYLER,~IENER,~ILHELI,~WALDRON g4g 794 0725 T-ZB8 P.002/004, F-302
~"'"' ~ ~' ~'"" AUnt 16 2002
~,~*~ ~... ~. ~. City Council ~ ~o .,~ ~o.
~o~ *~' ~ City
.~ ..~,~o..~ ~. c~*~ Attorney
~,~.~' .u~,.o.o :~,~*~,..,~ou James Mark~n
...... · .................. Craig Fox
Regina Danner
~ FACS~E & CERTI~D ~IL City Manager
~TU~ ~CE~ ~Q~STED City Clerk
Engr
Dcbbic Ad~. Ciw Clerk Walt Stickney
CiW of ~cho Cucmonga Maria Perez
1-0500 Ci~c C~ter
~cho Cucmonga, CA 91730
Re: Objections to Adoption of~solution of Necessi~ re Acqa~ition
of Permanent Street Easement on Po~ons of APN 0227:161-21,
San Bernardino Count, Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga
De~ ~. Adm:
Plc~c be adhaed ~at ~is f~ r~rescnts Ossi ~d ~ Pieroffi (~e "Piero~is")
~e ome~ of real prop~ identified ~ ~sessor P~cel Number 0227-161-21, located
wi~ ~c Ci~ of Rancho Cucmonga, Co~W of San Bem~dino (~e "subject
prope~"). We ~ve received notice that ~e Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga ("Ci~") int~
to ~opt a ~esolution of Nec~siW ("Resolution") to ~quire a poffion or potions of~e
subject proge~ for a public project.
~is letter will se~e to provide notice to the Ci~ that our office require to appear
~d be heard at ~e Resolution he~ing on behalf of the Pieroais. In lieu of personally
apgemng at ~e Resolution hc~ing, we hereby submit ~e following w~tten objections to
· c adoption of~c Resolution. Ple~e infom us i~ediately as to whe~cr the City will
receive ~d auach, ~ paA of~e pem~ent record, thc following w~en objections to the
Resolution, or whether it is necess~ for a representative of our office to aAend the
he~ing on ~e Resolution. cu~ently set for Angst 21, 2002.
10:40~m From-PALNIIERi,TYLER,WIENER,WILI~ELM&WALDRON 949 ?94 0?25 T-2;8 P.003/004 F-302
Debbie Adams, City Clerk
August 16, 2002
Page 2
To the extent the City will receive these objections on behalf of the Pierottis, they
object to the adoption of the Resolution on each of the following grounds:
1. The Public Interest and Neeessi~, Do Not Require the Proposea_
The proposed improvements related to the permanent street easement are not
necessary and are for the benefit ofprivate development not a public use.
2. The Proposed Project is Not Plan~ed or Located in a M~nner That
Will Be Most Compatible with the Greatest Public Good and the Least
Private In.inlY.
The subject property, while currently unimproved, is located in a prime area for
development. The taking ofthepermanent street easement fxom the subject property will
cause irreparable damage to the real property remainder and its available and adaptable
uses.
3. The Acquisition of a Portion of the Subiect Property is Not Necessar3,
for the Proposed Pro. iect.
As described above, the City does not need to acquire the permanent street
easement as it is not necessary for the private development, nor is it planned for the
,m'eatest public good when compared to the irreparable damage it will cause to the subject
property.
4. _The City is Incapable of Conducting a Fair~ Legal and Impar~i
Hearing on the Resolution
Due to its involvement in permitting private development in the area, the City has
already committed itself to the project, and the adoption of the Resolution here would be
a predetermined result. As such, any hearing by the City to allegedly "consid6r" the
issues pertaining to the adoption of the Resolution, would be sham and therefore voidable
by a court of competent jurisdiction.
5. The City Failed to Extend a Legitimate Precondemnation Offer.
California Government Code section 7267.2 requires the City to make a legitimate
offer of compensation pursuant to an approved appraisal before initiating eminent domain
!!/ AuS'-ZO-2OOZ lO:40arn From-P^t.k~IERI,TYLER,WIEHER,~ILHELkI&~ALDROH 949 TO4 07Z5 Tq68 P.004/004 F-30Z
P~I~RI, ~ ~E~R, W~L~E~ & W~RON LLP
Debbie Ad~s, Ci~ Clerk
Au~st 16, 2002
Page 3
proceedings. Here, the appraisal prepared by the City is stale. Although dated in March
of 2002, the appraisal relies upon stale comparable sales data and fails to fully consider
the adverse impacts to the subject property remainder.
In addition, the City is taking an improper appraisal position to value the property
taken predicted on a dedication requirement. The City cannot meet the required showing
of proportionality and nexus between development of the subject property and the need
for street improvements to support a dedication requirement.
6. The City Failed to Make Reasonable Efforl~ to Acquire a Portion of
*he Subiect Property without the Need For Litigation.
California Government Code section 7267.1 requires the City to make every
reasonable effort to acquire property expeditiously and tl~ough negotiation, not
condemnation. To date, the City has failed to make reasonable efforts to negotiate with
the Pierottis to acquire their interest in the Subject property.
7. The City has Failed To Satis ,fy the Requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The City failed to provide adequate notice to the Pierortis related to its adoption of
environmental clearance documents, such as an EIR or EIS in violation of the California
Public Resources Code sections 21000, et seq. As such, the Pierottis believe that the City
failed to comply with CEQA, which mandates that environmental assessments be made
and approved prior to the implementation of a public project which has significant
impacts on the environment.
Based on the foregoing objections, the Pierottis request that the City not adopt the
Resolution. If there are any questions or comments concerning these objections to the
Resolution, feel free to contact the undersigned at (949) 851-7220.
Very truly yours,
Charles S. Krolikowski
CSK:cg
cc: Ossi and Anna Pierotti
· /
ff Au.r-20-Z00Z 10:4Oam Froa-P^LtllERI,TYLER,WlENER,WtLHEL~W^LDRON 949 T~4
./
PALMIERI, TYLI~.R, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON LLP
(g49) 851-:3844 E;AST TOWER -- SUITE t300 OrAL NUMBER
(949) 757-1225 P.O. ~;OX '19712 (949) 851-72~*0
(949) 851-2351 1(849) 851-9400
FA C$~rLE COVER
Date: Auguzt 20, 2002 Time: 10:36 AM
File Name: Pierotti File No.: 99999-910
To Fax No. Telephone No.
ARm Sharell Odffen (909) 477-2846 (909) 477-2700
Debbic AOam~ City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
From: Charles S. Krolikowski
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES LNCLUDING THIS FORM IS: 4
Message: Please see attachetL
ORIGINAL WILL:
[] BE SENT BY MAlL [] BE SENT BY F~DEX/OVERNIGHT COUIUER
~ BE ~ BY ~[~SS]~4GER [] NOT BE SENT
If all pages are not received, please call Aha Forslund at (949) g51-7237,
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DDA DRC2002-00446B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 21, 2002
Page 3
AREA TWO
N
EXHIBIT "A" s
NE~' CENSUS D~rA
REFLECTS RC PROGlW~SS
VICI'OI/IA G~IlDENS MAll.
ROSIZII~~
RC
Tt;IMIIlON 'lO
KIDS BOOKS ~'! Nt \~
LIBRARY
KIDSMOBILE TO GI'T
LmR'dC~ S~ R', l( ES U ' 15°A
PRIORI'IT
TH E CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-
MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND LOCAL SUPPLEMENT, AS THE
CITY'S BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the San Bernardino
County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan and Local Supplement, as the City's Bicycle
Transportation Plan.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga's 2001 General Plan Update
envisions an extensive bicycle and pedestrian trail system. In order to qualify for certain grant
funds, such as the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program, the City must prepare a local
Bicycle Transportation Plan and be approved by the Caltrans Bicycle Facilities Unit. The
responsible agency for regional transportation planning, the San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG), has prepared a Non-Motorized Transportation Plan 2001 Update for
San Bernardino County, which fulfills all requirements of a Bicycle Transportation Plan in
Section 891.2 (a-k) of the Streets and Highways Code. Caltrans policy allows the City to adopt
the San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan 2001 Update, with supplemental
information, as our Bicycle Transportation Plan. The attached supplement provides information
relevant to our community.
CONCLUSION: The adoption of this Bicycle Transportation Plan implements the transportation
and air quality policies of the 2001 General Plan Update, in particular:
"2.3. 10.8. We will promote non-motorized transportation.
"3.5.4. We shall evaluate proposed parking and circulation plans for new
school sites and will coordinate with school districts to provide for safe
pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular access to and around schools.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
August21,2002
Page2
"3.5.5. We shall pursue trip reduction and transportation systems
management measures to reduce congestion on roadways and at
intersections.
"3.5. 10. We should implement a safe and efficient system of bicycle trails
throughout our community."
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DC/jc
Attachments: San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan*
Local Supplement*
Draft Resolution Adopting the San Bernardino Non-Motrorized Transportation
Plan 2001 Update
*Previously distributed under separate cover due to length.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2001 UPDATE
AND LOCAL SUPPLEMENT THERETO, AS THE CITY'S BICYCLE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN.
WHEREAS, the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program provides funding to City
and County projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters; and
WHEREAS, the BTA program, and other grant programs, require that local agencies
prepare a local Bicycle Transportation Plan, which must be adopted after 1997 and approved by
the Caltrans Bicycle Facilities Unit; and
WHEREAS, the responsible agency for regional transportation planning, the San
Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), has prepared a Non-Motorized Transportation
Plan 2001 Update for San Bernardino County, which fulfills all requirements of a Bicycle
Transportation Plan in Section 891.2 (a-k) of the Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's 2001 General Plan Update envisions an
extensive bicycle and pedestrian trail system consistent with the goals of the Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan 2001 Update for San Bernardino County, which local agencies may adopt
to qualify for funding; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Bicycle Transportation Plan implements the transportation
and air quality policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's 2001 General Plan Update, in
particular:
"2.3. 10.8. We will promote non-motorized transportation.
"3.5.4. We shall evaluate proposed parking and circulation plans for new
school sites and will coordinate with school districts to provide for safe
pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular access to and around schools.
"3.5.5. We shall pursue trip reduction and transportation systems
management measures to reduce congestion on roadways and at
intersections.
"3.5.10. We should implement a safe and efficient system of bicycle trails
throughout our community."
WHEREAS, on October 17, 2001, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact
Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2000061027) for the General Plan Update and this Bicycle
Transportation Plan is consistent with the General Plan. This Environmental Impact Report was
as a Program Environmental impact Report. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
provides that no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for
subsequent projects within the scope of the Program Environmental Impact Report. Based
upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental impact Report, together
with all written and oral reports, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that
the adoption of the Bicycle Transportation Plan will have a significant' effect upon the
environment; therefore, the proposed adoption is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines,
Section 15061.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Augu~ 21,2002
Page 2
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major
revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant
environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified
significant effects.
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous
Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known
and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1) the
project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental
Impact Report; 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one
or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative; or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA that it does hereby adopt the San Bernardino County Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan 2001 Update, and the attached supplemental information as the City's
Bicycle Transportation Plan.
R A N C H O C u c A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Retort
DATE: August 21,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the
Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Day Creek Park (Previously Rancho Etiwanda Park):
· Ballfield and tennis court lights have been installed. Curbs and walls have been poured.
Concrete walkways are being poured.
South Etiwanda Park:
· Design work is underway.
Coyote Canyon Park:
· Construction is complete.
Central Park:
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21,2002
· The project is moving ahead. Engineering staff is working with the consultant in
coordinating utility placement and related street improvements.
East Beryl Park:
· Demolition of the tot lot and restroom roof has occurred. New irrigation lines are being
installed.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
· Western Hoe Down, August 22nd, 10:00 a.m. Join us for a good old-fashioned Hoe Down.
The event will include refreshments, entertainment and door prizes. Entertainment will
feature the Senior Center popular Cowboy Vern Acree and his band. This event is co-
sponsored with the VIP Club.
· Hospitality Bar-B-Q Dinner - Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 5:00 p.m. This popular
activity returns in September to help acquaint new seniors to the Center.
· The annual VIP Club Picnic will be held at Red Hill Community Park on Thursday,
September 19, 2002.
· The Senior Advisory Committee during the month of July held a fundraising subcommittee
meeting to formulate a plan for future development for furnishings of the new Senior Center.
In addition, six committee members attended the second annual Nell Soto Senior Summit in
San Bernardino. The Committee does not hold a regular meeting in August. Their next
regularly scheduled meeting will be held on Monday, September 23rd at 9:00 a.m. at the
Senior Center.
Human Services:
· Homeowners and Renter Assistance - Trained AARP tax counselors will be at the Center
on Tuesdays beginning July 2, 2002 through August 27th from 9:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. to
assist qualified homeowners and renters file for a refund. Counseling will be done on a first-
come, first-serve basis.
· The Doctor is In - Dr. Harvey Cohen will provide a free lecture on Hyperthyroidism on
August 21, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. Pre-registration is required. Dr. Cohen
will also provides free monthly health lectures on the 3rd Tuesday of the month starting at 12
noon, walk-ins are welcome.
· Breathe Easy Workshop - The Orchard Plaza Therapy Clinic will offer a free monthly
Breathe Easy Workshop covering areas in diaphragmatic breathing, exercise tolerance and
pulmonary rehabilitation. This free workshop will be offered the third Wednesday of the
month from 10:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21,2002
· Elder Law Matters., Attorney Gregory Wood offers free elder law counseling every second
Friday of the month, 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m. by appointment only. Attorney Wood also
offers free legal seminars every 4th Friday of the month at 12:00 noon.
· Immunization Clinic, Low Cost immunizations are available for children 2 months through 18
years of age and senior citizens every second and fourth Monday of the month from 1:30
p.m. until 3:30 p.m. No appointment necessary. Co-sponsored by the San Bernardino
County Department of Public Health.
USDA Food Commodities, Surplus food commodities are distributed on the first Monday of
each month to eligible Iow-income residents of Rancho Cucamonga from 1:30 p.m. until
3:00 p.m. or until commodities are gone. A limited homebound program is available for
physically disabled individuals and seniors. Proof of income and residency is required.
· Senior Gasoline Service Proqram, Various gas stations throughout Rancho Cucamonga will
provide assistance in pumping gas to seniors 60 years and older. Sign-ups are necessary
and a certificate is required.
· Manaqinq Your Health, San Bernardino County Public Health Nurses will present a free six-
week workshop on Managing Your Health. Workshop topics will cover areas in muscle
relaxation, identifying health problems, and goal setting. The program begins in
September, dates and times to be announced.
Trips and Tours:
· Solvanq, September 21,2002. Danish Days in Solvang. Step into this quaint Danish village
and enjoy all the sights, sounds and scents that surround you. Enjoy the day at your leisure
exploring the Scandinavian import shops and bakeries of $olvang.
· The Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace, October 5, 2002. The 9-acre Library and
Birthplace is a three-dimensional walk-through memoir featuring a 52,000 square foot
museum, 22 high-tech galleries, movie and interactive video theatres, the spectacular First
Lady's Garden, the President's faithfully restored 1910's birthplace and the flower-ringed
memorial sites of President and Mrs. Nixon.
· The Getty Center, November 2, 2002. The Getty Center tour begins with a tram ride to the
summit, taking in unexpected views of the historic Sepulveda Pass. At the museum you can
watch a brief orientation film. From there you are free to experience all the Getty has to
offer at your own pace.
· Rose Parade, January 1,2003. Enjoy the world famous Rose Parade from premium
grandstand seats along Colorado Blvd.
372-
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21, 2002
Volunteer Services:
· Details are being finalized for the completion of a new Volunteer Proqram Brochure.
· The table on the next page summarizes CSD volunteer usaqe for the month of June and
year to date.
Month: June 2002 YEAR TO DATE
~ of it of Hours Dollar Value ~ of if of Dollar Value
~olunteers ~/olunteers I-Iours
Admin E 33 $462 31 108 $1,512
Sports 271 1,673 $23,422 1,69(~ 17,195 $240,730~
Sr & Human 5~ 253 $3,542 35£ 2,300 $32,20(
Services
Special 2c~ 102 $1,42~ 19~ 2,346 $32,84z
Events
Youth 14~ 556 $7,784 431~ 4,591 $65,476
Programs
Tota, I 5,01 2,8,71 $38,6381 2,7081 26, 01 $372,762
*Dollar value based on $14.00 per hour.
Teens:
· Teen Center - During the month of July three hundred and forty (340) youngsters attended
the Teen Center. During the remainder of the summer months attendance numbers at the
Center are expected to continue to increase.
During the summer months the Teen Center has extended hours. Our summer hours are
Monday - Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Friday's.
The Teen Center Homework Room - During the month of July 25 teens used the homework
room. The numbers of teens using the homework room generally decreases during the
summer months and will start to increase again in late September.
Two hundred and forty (240) teens have registered for our trip pm.qram this year.
Youngsters are enjoying weekly trips to attractions such as Medieval Times, Pharaoh's
Water Park, Universal Studios, Knott's Berry Farm, Magic Mountain and Disneyland. At the
end of summer we hold our week long Summer Camping Trip at Mission Bay.
Teen Center staff toured three local teen centers in the area; Walnut, Fontana and
Claremont to visit their facilities and discuss programming ideas with their teen staff.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21,2002
· The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC), twice-monthly babysitting service Night on the
Town is usually at capacity. The following numbers are the totals for the number of children
cared for during the month: July - 188 and an estimated 220 for August.
Over 40 TRAC teens participate in our monthly meetinqs. Total number of TRAC members
participating in City programs from the mid-June through the end of July is approximately
212 youth.
The TRAC program operates a daily snack bar for our aquatics program at Alta Loma High
School. TRAC volunteers also operate the snack bars for our City movies and concerts in
the park program.
· Forty-one (41) youngsters to date have participated in our Teen Learning Center (TLC)
program for the summer. TLC youth are given the opportunity to gain on-the-job experience
while volunteering with our summer youth and camp programs.
· The Spruce Park Skate Facility - Usage of the skate facility during the month of July was
estimated at 1,350 skaters. Staff has been making regular weekly visits to the skate park to
promote safe skating by distributing donated chips and beverages to youngsters wearing the
proper gear.
Youth Activities:
· Our summer camp activities include: Day Camp, a full day camp for 5-12 year olds and is
held at Alta Loma High School; Kid Explorers a twice weekly, half-day program for
youngsters 5-10 meets at Lions East Community Center; and PlayCamp, an hour/hour and
fifty minutes program for tiny tots ages 1-6 year meets at Lions East Community Center.
Each activity offers special age appropriate activities that are guaranteed to make a
youngster's summer fun of fun. Enrollment figures for the summer for each program is
summarized in the table below:
Program Enrollment
Day Camp 561
Kid Explorers 343
Play Camp 426
· The Mobile Recreation Program Fun on the Run is going strong. The program served over
550 youth during the timeframe of mid-July through mid-August. The Recreation Unit visits
the following park sites this summer:
9:00 a.m. until 12.'00- noon 1:00 p.m. until 4:00 p.m.
Monday Lions Park Bear Gulch Park
Tuesday Church Street Park Mountain View Park
Wednesday Eliena Park Hermosa Park
Thursday Old Town Park Red Hill Community Park
Friday Victoria Groves Park Windrows Park
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21,2002
Grants:
· Teen Connection - During the summer months, staff has been busy planning and organizing
activities for the high school for the fall. Next year Los Oso High School will be added to the
calendar of sites to attend during the lunch hour.
· Youth Enrichment Services (YES) - Attendance is increasing at both the Mulberry Learning
Center and Lions East Community Center. For the period of mid-July through the end of
August staff estimates that 2,700 residents will visit the Lions East and Mulberry FACTS
Centers. For the same timeframe staff estimates that 300 parents will attend our parent
education classes. During the month of July over 100 car seat inspections were performed.
Staff attended a half-day orientation meeting for our new YES contract grant during the
reporting period. This meeting, conducted by the staff of the Children and Families
Commission, provided information to contractors on requirements/deadlines for both
program reports and fiscal reporting.
Classes:
· Contract Classes are going well for the summer. Two thousand three hundred and ninety-
six (2,396) community members are enrolled in our summer contract classes program.
Registration for the fall session for contract classes begins on August 19th. Starting with this
session participants in our contract classes will have the opportunity to enroll themselves in
classes on-line. Classes available for on-line registration has been marked in The
Grapevine with a small computer 'mouse' next to the class description.
Youth Sports:
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Baseball 650 3-5/boys & girls 65
Youth Soccer Camp 40 6-12/boys & girls N/A
Youth Basketball 775 6-16/boys & girls 88
Youth Basketball Camp 45 6-12/boys & girls N/A
Youth Volleyball Camp 30 8-12/boys & girls N/A
RC Sports Camp 140 5-12/boys & girls N/A
Aquatics/Learn to Swim Program:
· The table below and on the next page summarizes participation in our summer Learn to
Swim Program for the month of July:
Activity Number of Participants
Lessons at Alta Loma High School Pool 584
Lessons at Etiwanda High School Pool 230
Open Swim 1,606
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21, 2002
Activity Number of Participants
Pool Parties 25 parties; approximately 752 participants
Private Lessons 82
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting
period:
Activity # of Participants
Adult Basketball 453
Youth Basketball 553
Adult Racquetball 320
Youth Racquetball 64
Adult Volleyball 28
Youth Volleyball 11
· The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Adult Racquetball 18 Adult/Males N/A
Adult Sports:
· Thirty-two (32) adult males and females participated in tennis leaques during the reporting
period.
· Four softball tournaments are scheduled for the month of August at the Epicenter and Adult
Sports Complex.
· The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period:
Activity # of Participants # Teams Gender
Softball 2,704 169 Male/Female
Soccer 800 50 Male/Female
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sport fields for non-profit or,qanized youth sport leaques. For the reporting period,
10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 177,782 participants and
spectators enjoying our parks.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21, 2002
Community Wide Special Events:
· Rancho N~qhts: a Community Marketplace and Concert in the Park - Looking for something
to do to jump start your weekend. Come enjoy wonderful foods, an array of hand crafted
memhandise, pick up some fresh produce from our certified Farmer's Market and stay for an
evening of music under the stars while you enjoy our Concerts in the Park series. The
season starts on June 6th and continuing through every Thursday night at Red Hill
Community Park until August 29, 2002. The marketplace begins at 5:00 p.m. and the
concert begins at 7:00 p.m. Our August line-up of concerts includes: Cody Bryant (Country)
-August 1st; Raging Sun (Jazz/Blues)- August 8t"; Upstream (Reggae/Calypso) -August
15th; Down w/Three (Latin) - August 22nd; and The Answer (Classic Rock) - August 29th.
· Movies in the Park started up on July 8th and continue through August 16t". Our line up of
films include: Harry Potter (July 8, 10 & 12); Atlantis The Lost Empire (July 15, 17 & 19);
Monster, Inc. (July 22, 24 & 26); Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius (July 19, 31 and August 2);
Cats & Dogs (August 5, 7 & 9); and Shrek (August 12, 14 & 16).
· Family Entertainment Series: Comedy Circus- On August 17th at the Epicenter Stadium, the
Family Entertainment Series proudly presented a line up of family oriented comedy and fun.
The free 6:00 p.m. show featured a line up of professionals (Carlos Oscar and Dana Daniels
with McCory Edwards) from Clean Comedians that specialize in family entertainment. When
this report was written attendance information was not available for this program. This
information will be provided to Council in the September update report.
· The Spirit of America - Wednesday, September 11,2002, 7:30 p.m. Alta Loma High School
Auditorium. An evening of stunning patriotic music featuring the renowned Windsong
Southland Chorale, in remembrance of the victims of September 11th.
· The Special Event Division is working on the State Farm Open Golf Tournament at Empire
Lakes that is scheduled for this fall.
· Staff has started its planning efforts for the City's 25th Founder's Day Parade and
Celebration that is scheduled for Saturday, November 9, 2002. This event will kick off the
City's 2-~'anniversary celebration and will feature the theme, Celebrating 25 Years of
Excellence.
Cultural and Performing Arts:
· Summer Production: The Pa~ama Game - The Pajama Game was presented at the Alta
Loma High School on Fridays (7:30 p.m.), Saturdays (7:30 p.m.) and Sundays (2:00 p.m.)
from July 26th until August 4, 2002. The cast of 80 talented youngsters and young adults
brought this classic musical to life. Community Theater productions continue to draw large
community interest and provides an enriching environment for children to enhance their
creative talents. In addition this production had a very strong parent support system. When
this report was written attendance information was not available for this program. This
information will be provided to Council in the September update report.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21, 2002
· Performing Arts Troupe - The Cultural Arts Division is launching its first City Performing Arts
Troupe. Auditions are scheduled for the end of August. A professional choreographer has
been hired to lead the group. This sure to be highly talented troupe will perform at City and
community events.
Parks and Facilities:
· The table below provides information on park/special use facility reservations for the month
of July 2002:
Location Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications Processed of
Rentals
Red Hill 2,353 44 53 194
Community Park
Heritage Community 928 21 21 100
Park
Hermosa Park 433 12 16 44
Coyote Canyon Park 350 9 13 34
Civic Center 150 1 1 5
Courtyard
Amphitheater 0 0 0 0
Equestrian Center 200 4 4 27
Total 4,414 91 108 404
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
· Equestrian Center usa.qe for the months of Au.qust and September 2002 is shown in the
table below:
Group Date Event/Time Frame
Alta Loma Riding Club August 1st Board Meeting/7:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club August 4th Playday/8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club August 20th General Meeting/6:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
4-H Club August 26t" Ice Cream Social/Registration/7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club September 5t" Board Meeting/7:30p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
Rising Stars of September 15tn Dressage Schooling Show/8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Equestrian Therapy
4-H Club September 16tn General Meeting/7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club September 17t~ General Meeting/6:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The most recent meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission took place on Auqust 151
2002. At this meeting the Commission discussed/acted upon the following items:
> Senior Advisory Committee update.
$?8
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21, 2002
Sports Advisory Committee update.
Status of legislative efforts for Senior Center Project.
Update on proposed Central Park project.
Update on proposed Cultural Center project.
Review of proposed design for Victoria Arbor Park.
Discussion regarding Commissioners participation in the NRPA Congress to be held
in October 2002.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Foundation's August 13, 2002,
meeting:
Update on proposed Cultural Center project.
Follow up session regarding Board development.
Sponsorship of volunteers for State Farm Open.
· Staff is in the process of preparing an Annual Report that summarizes the activities of the
Foundation for the past year.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
· The following activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period:
> Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Explorer Post 540 - Inland Empire Fire
Explorer Muster - Epicenter Special Event Area and Parking Lot B - July 27, 2002.
> Community Services Department - Family Entertainment Program - Epicenter
Stadium - August 17, 2002.
· Staff is working with the following organizations for future/tentative bookings at the
Epicenter:
AYSO - Picture Day- Epicenter Soccer Fields - September 7, 2002.
Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana Family YMCA - Classic Car Show- Epicenter Special
Event Area - September 7, 2002.
Big Top Tents - Used Car Show- Epicenter Special Event Area - September 19-23,
2002.
Active Ride Shop - Skate Demonstration and Concert - Epicenter Special Event
Area - September 27, 2002.
>Relief RX - Commercial Filming - Epicenter Stadium - End of September 2002.
> Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commeme - Grape Harvest Festival- October 2-
7, 2002.
· Staff is in the process of developing a 5-minute Epicenter marketinq video of the facility.
This piece will provide potential users/renters of the facility with an up close look at all of
the amenities that the facility has to offer. Copies of the video will be available in both
CD and VHS format and will also be loading onto the Epicenter's website.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
August 21,2002
· Staff is working to audit and refine the Epicenter website to enhance its user friendliness.
Respectful.~ submitted,
Kevin IV~bArdle
Community Services Director
hlCOMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCouncil~StaffReports~OO2~update8.21.02, doc