HomeMy WebLinkAbout687 - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 687
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGAAPPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B AMENDING THE
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, SPECIALTY
COMMERCIAL, AND UTILITY TO MIXED USE FOR 10 ACRES OF
LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE -APN: 208-151-01, 14
THRU16, AND 19; 208-152-06, 07, 09 THRU 12, 14, 16 THRU 22;
208-153-01 THRU 05, AND 08 THRU 23.
A. RECITALS.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development District
Amendment DRC2002-00446B as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is
referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of July 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date and adopted Resolution No. 02-70,
recommending approval of said application to the City Council.
3. On the 21st day of August 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption ofthis Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on August 21, 2002, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 10 acres of land, located on
the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue.
Said property is currently designated as Community Commercial,
Specialty Commercial, and Utility;, and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is occupied by single-
family homes. The propertyto the west is in the designated Mixed
Use and is occupied by various non-conforming single-family homes
Ordinance No. 687 DENIED
Page 2 of 3
and small businesses. The property to the east is designated
Community Commercial and is occupied by a shopping center
(Miller's Outpost Plaza). The property to the south is designated
Specialty Commercial and Community Commercial, and is occupied
by restaurants and offices.
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use
Element; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to
the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on
the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the
Development Code; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that
based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to
State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b-3) and Rancho Cucamonga CEQA
Guidelines Section F(10). Furthermore, the City Council approved an
Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update in October of 2001,
and the amendment is consistent with the General Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment
DRC2002-00446B by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
DENIED Ordinance No. 687
Page 3 of 3
DENIED this 21st day of August 2002.
AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatato, Dutton, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
William J. 7der, Ma~or/
ATTEST:
Kathryn L.~,Scott, E~e~uty City Clerk
I, KATHRYN L. SCOTT, DEPUTY CITY CLERK, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and denied at a Regular
st
Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21 day of August 2002.
Executed this 22"d day of August 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Kathryn L.:'.Scott,'-'D(~puty~ity C erk