HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/11/20 - Agenda Packet CITY OF
RANCHQCUCAMONGA
'10500 CiVic cerite[, Drive
Rancho ' ' '~
Cucamgnga, C{¢ 91730
City Office: (~0~) 477-2700
AGENDAS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
NOVEMBER 20, 2002
A.qency, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane ............................... Member
Grace Curatalo ......................... Member
Bob Dutton .............................. Member
Jack Lam .........................City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane
Curatalo Dutton and Williams
B..~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation to State Senator Nell Soto in appreciation of her
leadership and service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as our
Representative in the California State Senate.
2. Presentation to Bob Dutton in appreciation of his service to the people
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. Presentation of Certificates to Alta Loma, Cucamonga, Central and
Etiwanda School Districts on behalf of their respective schools in
recognition of their participation at the Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) Day Celebration at City Hall from November 12 through
November 19, 2002, and for promoting the use of GIS technology in
schools.
4. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of"Geography Awareness
Week," November 17 through 23, and proclaiming November 20, 2002
as "National Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Day."
5. Presentation of a Proclamation in Recognition of "National Family
Week."
6. Presentation of a Commemorative September 11th Poem to the City
Council from Community Volunteer, Hilda Katz Phillips.
C.._:. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Counciimember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October ,~
31,2002.
2. Approval of Warrants, Register October 30 through November 12, 8
2002, and Payroll ending October 24, 2002, for the total amount of
$2,887,335.11.
3. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment. 36
4. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation
Commission for potential fundraising activities by the Senior Advisory 51
Committee for the new Senior Center at Central park.
5. Approval to appropriate funds received from the Department of Housing 53
and Urban Development for a grant in the amount of $50,000 for
Conceptual Design of Phase 1 of the Senior Center at Central Park
(12393035650/1330239-0).
6. Approval of Street Banner Applications and Schedule for calendar 2003 61
Year.
7. Approval to purchase emergency vehicle preemption devices from a 64
sole source as required by Caltrans for installation at State Route 210
related traffic signals in an amount not to exceed $40,000 from Acct.
No. 1124-308-5650-1160124-0.
8. Approval of Annexation of work program areas to Landscape 66
Maintenance District No. 10, located on both sides of Day Creek
Boulevard, north of the 210 Freeway.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-292 68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE WORK
PROGRAM FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 10, FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA
REVISED UNIVERSITY PROJECT
9. Approval of Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - 73
Application to designate the Mitchell Family Residence as an Historic
Landmark, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-331-07.
Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003, Mills Act
Agreement MA2002-00001, and Minor Development Review DRC2002-
00806.
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
3
RESOLUTION NO. 02-293 86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK
DESIGNATION LD2002-00003 -
DESIGNATING THE MITCHELL FAMILY
RESIDENCE AN HISTORIC LANDMARK,
LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF- APN: 208-331-07
10. Approval of Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001 - SOHEILA AZlZl -
73
Request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on
the Mitchell Family Residence, a Historic Landmark, located at 10213
Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-331-07. Related files: Landmark
Designation LD2002-00807, Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-
00003, and Minor Design Review DR02002-00806.
11. Approval to increase the contract award with Boyle Engineering
Corporation (CO 02-087) for preparation of construction plans, 89
specifications, and construction cost estimates for the Pacific Electric
Inland Empire Trail, Phase 2, from Amethyst Street to Archibald
Avenue, to be funded from Acct. No. 11103165300 for the amount of
$40,658 with a portion to be reimbursed from a grant under the Bicycle
Transportation Account (BTA).
12. Approval of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 99
- Phase II Permit Fee and appropriation of $12,500 into Acct. No. 1001-
306-5300.
13. Approval of the Deannexation of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15802 from 101
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 7, located on the west side of East Avenue, north of
Banyan Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-294 103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
DEANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 15802
14. Approval of easements from Southern California Edison for the 110
installation of Banyan Street Improvements and for storm drains west of
Wilson Avenue and north of Tract 14496, located west of Day Creek
Boulevard in the Rancho Etiwanda Development.
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
4
RESOLUTION NO. 02-295 128
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO ACCEPT GRANTS OF A ROAD
EASEMENT AND A STORM DRAIN
EASEMENT FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS THEREON, AND TO CAUSE
THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR
RECORDATION
15. Approval of release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 129
Agreement (CO 02-132) for Parcel 1 of parcel Map 8901, located on
the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-296 131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RELEASING OF REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL 1 OF
PARCEL MAP 8901, LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND CENTER AVENUE
16. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 132
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00185,
located on the southeast corner of knuckle intersection of Dorset Street
and Cartilla Avenue, submitted by Rancho Pacific Development
Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-297 135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00185
RESOLUTION NO. 02-298 136
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00185
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
5
17. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape 144
maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map 15781, located at the northwest and
southwest corners of Highland Avenue at Day Creek Boulevard,
submitted by Ralphs Grocery Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-299 147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 15781, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 02-300 148
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 15781
18. Approval of release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 157
Agreement for Development Review 84-02, located on the southeast
corner of Jersey Boulevard and Boston Place.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-301 159
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND
LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 84-02, LOCATED ON THE
SQUTHEAST CORNER OF JERSEY
BOULEVARD AND BOSTON PLACE
19. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the 160
execution of the contract in the amount of $586,564.00 ($533,240.00
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Albert W. Davies,
Inc., (CO 02-0133) for the construction of the Foothill Boulevard Storm
Drain Improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to 1600' Easterly, to be
funded from AD 84-1 Day Creek Funds, Acct. No.
16023035650/1414602-0.
20. Approval of a policy for the use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities 164
Act of 1982 for proposed Community Facilities District 2003-01.
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 02-302 167
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, WAIVING CERTAIN POLICIES
SET FORTH IN THE CITY'S STATEMENT OF
GOALS AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF
THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITIES
FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 IN CONNECTION
WITH PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2003-01
21. Approval for the award of a window cleaning services contract for
various city facilities, per the bids received to Sunshine Windows, of 169
Upland, (CO 02-134) in an annual amount not to exceed $34,600.00.
22. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 08083234 in the 170
amount of $10,359.43, for the Lemon Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street, Contract No. 01-039.
23. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. AE2664674 in '172
the amount of $8,968.80, for the Amethyst Avenue Street and Storm
Drain Improvements from 300 feet north of Roberds Court to 450 feet
north, Contract No. 01-045.
24. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. CB48961 in the 174
amount of $3,657.80, for the North Etiwanda Security Wall between
South Termini of Stephens Place and Koch Place, Contract No. 01-046.
E.~. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
1. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00770 - KISCO SENIOR 176
LIVING - A proposed Development Agreement (CO 02-128) to permit a
parking ratio of 1.15 parking space per unit for an age-restricted
apartment community of 264 units on 9.6 acres of land in Planning Area
8 of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of
Fairview Place and 6th Street - APN: 210-082-53 thru 57. This project
is based on the Environmental Impact Reports prepared for the
Subarea 18 Specific Plan and the General Plan Update certified by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga in 1994 and 2001, respectively. This
project is within the scope of these prior environmental documents and
does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already
considered in the certified EIRs.
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
7
ORDINANCE NO. 691 (second reading) '176
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2002-00770, TO
ESTABLISH A UNIQUE PARKING RATIO FOR
A SENIOR APARTMENT PROJECT, LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE AND 6TM STREET AS PROVIDED
FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE FOR REAL PROPERTY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
210-082-53 THRU 57
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT DRC2002-00643 - FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES - A
proposed Development Agreement (CO 02-129) associated with a
proposal for 216 market-rate senior apadments in the High Residential
component (24-30 dwelling units per acre) of the Mixed Use MHO
District (Office, Hospital and related facilities) of the Terra Vista
Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and
Mayten Avenue - APN: 227-151-70. Related Files: Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM15923 and Development/Design Review DRC2002-
00633.
ORDINANCE NO. 692 (second reading) 200
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. DRC2002-00643, TO
ESTABLISH A UNIQUE PARKING RATIO FOR
A PROPOSED SENIOR APARTMENT
PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND
MAYTEN DRIVE, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN
SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE FOR REAL PROPERTY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN:
227-151-70
F. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN 225
2. PRESENTATION ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S IDENTITY
THEFT PROGRAM (Oral)
City Council Agenda
November 20, 2002
8
G.~. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S 248
RECOMMENDATION TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE LIBRARY
FOUNDATION
2. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO REAPPOINT LARRY 249
MCNIEL, PAM STEWART, AND PETER TOLSTOY TO THE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS (oral)
3. CONSIDERATION OF POLICY REGARDING COMMISSIONS 250
4. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO SUPPORT CONCEPTUAL 251
AREA PROTECTION PLAN FOR THE ETIWANDA NORTH
PRESERVE AUGMENTATION AREA BY THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (PR J2002-00172)
5. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 260
UPDATE
H.~. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
I. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
J. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on November 14, 2002, seventy two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
October 31, 2002
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency investment Funds 38,580,944.32 38,580,944.32 38,580,944.32 26.42 I I 2.453 2.487
Ce~ificat~s of ~eposlt/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,516,933.75 1,515,000.00 1.04 365 299 1.720 1.744
Commemial Paper - Discount 10,COO,000.00 9,987,424,61 9,987,425.00 6.84 26 23 1.742 1.766
Federal Age~y Issues - Coupon 85,500,000.00 86,845,779,28 85,470,156.25 58.53 1,629 1,173 5.041 5.111
Federal Agency Issues - Discount 10,500,000.00 10,484,399.75 10,481,137.08 7.18 39 34 1.647 1.670
Investments 146,~95,944.32 147,415,481.71 146,034,662.65 100.00% 962 694 3.854 3.907
Cash
Passbook/Checking 439,316.70 439,316.70 439,316.70 I 1 0.493 0.500
(not included in ~eld calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
146,535,261.02 147,854,798.41 146,473,979.35 962 694 3.854 3.907
Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 491,409.83 2,046,457.61
Average Daily Balance 148,771,385.37 150,175,449.44
Effective Rate of Return 3.89% 4.04%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21, 2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bend documents
gevem the management of t nds.
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/12/2002 - 12:15 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page2
Portfolio Details - Investments
October 31, 2002
A~erage Purchase Stated YTM Daysto Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mood,s 360 Maturity Date
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 38,580,944.32 38,580,944.32 38,580,944.32 2.487 2.453 1
Subtotal and A~erage 38~395,754.45 38,580,944.32 38,580,944.32 38,580,944.32 2.453 1
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
06050EM85 1145 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2002 1,515,000.00 1,516,933.75 1,515,000.00 1.720 1.720 299 08/27/2003
Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,(~0.00 1,516,933.75 1,515,~00.00 1.720 299
Commercial Paper- Discount
19122BLM8 1156 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES 10/29/2002 5,000,000.00 4,994,473.61 4,994,473.61 1.730 1.732 20 11/21/2002
45974NLT1 1157 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 10/29/2002 5,000,000.00 4,992,951.00 4,992,951.39 1.750 1.752 26 11/27/2002
Subtotal and A~mge 10,095,465.74 10,000,000.00 9,987,424.61 9~987,425.00 1.742 23
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3133MTDE5 1155 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/28/2002 1,500,000.00 1,507,500.CO 1,500,000.00 3.300 3.255 1,092 10/28/2005
3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/06/1998 2,CO0,000.00 2,016,861.88 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 66 01/06/2003
31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2001 2,CO0,CO0.00 2,020,625.(;0 2,000,000.00 5.730 5.652 815 01/24/2005
31331LM88 1127 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 00/07/2002 2,000,000.00 2,097,500.00 2.000,000.00 5.200 5.129 1,648 05J07/2007
31331LU30 1131 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/11/2002 2,000,000.00 2,008,125.00 1,998,000.00 5.180 5.132 1,683 06/11/2007
31331L5K0 1139 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/01/2002 5,000,000.00 5,015,625.00 5,000,000.00 4.040 3.986 1,277 00/01/2006
31331QAH0 1146 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/04/2002 5,0~0,000.00 5,042,187.50 5,000,000.00 4.450 4.389 1,768 09/04/2007
31331QFG7 1154 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT E~ANK 10/24/2002 3,000,000.00 3,012,187.50 3,6CO,CO0.00 3.5~c0 3.512 1,361 07/24/2006
3133M2US4 01003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/06/1998 1,0CO,000.00 1,C~8,437.50 1,000,000.00 6.230 6.145 66 01/06/2~03
3133M6NE4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/~)8/1998 2,000,000.CO 2,0~5,000.00 2,C~O,000.00 5.530 5.454 402 12/08/2003
3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/21/1999 1,000,000.00 1,045,312.50 1,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 446 01/21/2004
3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,202,500.00 2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 594 06/17/2004
3133MCX34 1076 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,030,937.50 2,997,187.50 5.760 5.707 815 01/24/2005
3133MFBP2 1103 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/30/2001 2,000,000.00 2,045,000.00 1,999,062.50 5.800 5.731 1,306 05/30/2006
3133MFTE2 1105 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/06/2001 2,000,000.00 2,045,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.750 5.671 1,313 06/06/2(06
3133MNTN1 1128 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/29/2002 2,000,000.00 2,005,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 1,670 05/29/2007
3133MPPH3 1136 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/10/2002 4,000,000.00 4,020,000.00 4,000,000.00 4.500 4.438 1,347 07/10/2006
3133MRVG4 1150 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 09/27/2002 2,000,000.00 2,005,000.00 2.000,000.00 3.655 3.605 1,242 03227/2(X~
3133MSE97 1152 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2002 1,0~0,000.00 1,003,750.00 1,000,000.00 3.575 3.526 1,270 04/24/2006
312923MQ5 1081 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/2001 1,009,0~O.CO 1,012,843.93 1,000,C~0.O0 5.625 5.548 1,235 03/20/2006
312923SM8 1086 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/10/2001 4,0C~,0~O.00 4,057,999.88 4,0OO,000.00 5.510 5.435 1,256 04/10/2006
312923ZB4 1096 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05~8/2001 6,000,000.00 6,004,097.90 6,000,000.00 5.520 5.444 1,284 05/08/~006
3129242D4 1119 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/~0/2002 3,000,0C~.OD 3,020,318.76 3,0CO,CO0.00 4.750 4.685 1,193 02~o/2006
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Oate: 11/12~0(~ - 12:15 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page3
Portfolio Details - Investments
October 31, 2002
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Data
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
312925GT1 1122 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/18/2002 3,000,000.00 3,037,580.57 3,000,000.00 5.020 4.951 1,082 10/18/2005
312925JC5 1126 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/06~002 4,000,000.00 4,002,027.59 4,000,000.00 5.200 5.129 1,466 11~6/2006
31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,049,673.77 2,0CO,000.00 6.125 6.041 199 05/19/2003
3136FOAL6 1085 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/04~001 4,000,000.00 4,177,500.CO 3,994,375.00 5.300 5,259 1,244 03f29/2006
3136FOEW8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,049,687.50 2,997,CO0.00 5.510 5,457 1,263 04/17/2006
3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24f2001 2,000,000.00 2,115,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,300 05/24/2006
3136FIFF2 1118 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 01~23/2002 2,000,000.00 2,013,125.00 2,000,00000 5.000 4.932 1,179 01/23/~006
3136FIXU9 1123 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2002 4,000,000.00 4,057,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,088 10/24/2005
3136FIYT1 1125 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/25/2002 2,0001000,00 2,030,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,271 04~..5/2006
Subtotal and Average 87,195,962.70 85,500,000~00 86,845,779.28 85,470,156.25 5.041 1,173
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
313385P61 1153 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2002 6,000,CO0~00 5,995,200.00 5,992,893.33 1.640 1.642 18 11/19/2002
313385U61 1158 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/'30/2002 4,500,000.00 4,489,199.75 4,4~8,243.75 1.650 1.654 55 12/26/2002
Subtutal and Average 9,613,604.94 10,500,000.00 10,484,399.75 10,481,137.0~ 1.647 34
Treasury Securities - Discount
Subtotal and Average 868,173.39
Totel and Average 148,771 ~85.37 146,095,944.32 147,415,481.71 146,034,662.65 3.854 694
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/12~002 - 12:15 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 4
Portfolio Details - Cash
October 31, 2002
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/1Z/2002 - 12:15 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRe~t V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 5
Activi~ By Type
October 1,2002 through October 31, 2002
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
SYSOOO05 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 2.487 6,252,920.43 5,600,0CO.00
Subtotal 37,928,023.89 6,252,920.43 5,600,000.00 38,580,944.32
SavingsJMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
SYS00180 00180 SANK OF AMERICA 0.500 0.0(3 669,711.03
Subtotal 1,109,027.73 0.0~ 669,711.03 439,316.70
Certificates of DepositJNeg. - Bank
Subtotal 1,515,000.00 1,515,600.00
Commercial Paper - Discount
19122BLM8 1156 COCA-COL~ ENTERPRISES 1.730 10/29/2002 4,994,473,61 0.00
45974NLT1 1157 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 1.750 10/29/2002 4,992,951.39 O.CO
8923E3KF9 1121 TOYOTA b~)TOR CREDIT CDR P. 2.050 10/15/2002 0.00 4,947,895.83
8923E3KW2 1148 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. 1.740 10/30/2002 0.00 3,992,846.67
8923E3KV4 1151 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. 1.730 10/15/2002 6,995,290.56 0.00
8923E3KV4 1151 10/29/2002 0.00 6,995,290.56
Subtotal 8,940,742.50 16,~82,715.56 15,936,033.66 9,987,425.60
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3133MTDE5 1155 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.300 10/25/2002 1,500,000.00 0.00
31331LSG4 1112 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.125 10/29/2002 0.00 5,000,00000
31331QFG7 1154 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3.560 10/24/2002 3,000,000.00 0.00
3133MN4C2 1124 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.105 10/24Y2002 0.00 2,C00.000.00
3133MSE97 1152 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.575 1 0/24/2002 1,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 86,970,156.25 5,500,~.00 7,060,000.00 85,470,156.25
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
313385P61 1153 FEDERAL HOME LOAN SANK 1.640 10~24/2002 5,992,893.33 0.00
313385U61 1158 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.650 10/30/2002 4,488,243.75 0.00
313589L76 1147 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 1.690 10/24/2002 O.CO 7,486,620.83
313589L76 1149 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 1.680 10~24/2002 0.00 2,996,080.00
Subtotal 19,482,76(I.83 10,481,137.08 10,482,700.83 10,481,137.68
Treasury Securities - Discount
912795LE9 1140 TREASURY BILL 1.650 10/10/2002 0.00 2,990,375.00
Portfolio CITY
CP
( Date: 11112/2002 o 12;15 PM (PRF_PM3) S~Rept V621
Repo~ Vet. 5.~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 6
Activi~ By Type
October 1, 2002 through October 31, 2002
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
Subtotal 2,990,375.00 0.00 2,990,375.60 0.00
Total 149,936,026.20 39,216,773.07 42,678,819.92 146,473,979.35
Portfolio CITY
CP
ate: 11112/2002 - 12:15 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRe~t V6.21
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended September 30, 2002
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Pavlne Aeent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment Disthct No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.25% $ 257,311.78
Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Reserve Fund First Amedcan Treasury ObligaUon 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.25% 243,045.46
Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First An*edcan Treasury ObligaUon 8/4/1997 N/A 1.21% 660.11
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 501,017.35
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds sedes US Bank Expense Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25% $ 0.04
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25% 581,143.48
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Sr. Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 711/1999 NIA* 1.25% 1,091,748.45
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 1.25%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Residual Fund First Arnerican Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.25% 126,238.34
Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 1,799 130.31
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,300~t 47.66
* Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
1o/30,2002 5.'26 PM
i:lfinence~Cash with Fiscal Agent~xls
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190098 10/30/2002 A G ELECTRIC CAR SPECIALISTS 723.60
AP - 00190099 10/30/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 88.92
AP - 00190099 10/30/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 25.08
AP - 00190099 · 10/30/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 4.03
AP- 00190100 10/30/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 36~74
AP-00190101 10/30/2002 ABLETRONICS 234.68
AP- 00190101 10/30/2002 ABLETRONICS 14.15
AP- 00190102 10/30/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,248.00
AP - 00190103 10/30/2002 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 50.00
AP- 00190104 10/30/2002 ALANIS, ERICA 45.00
AP- 00190104 10/30/2002 ALANIS, ERICA 5.00
AP - 00190105 10/30/2002 ALCO PRODUCTS INC 960.12
AP - 00190106 10/30/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 440.10
AP- 00190107 10/30/2002 ALVAREZ, KRISTIN 15.20
AP - 00190108 10/30/2002 AMERI NATIONAL 201.00
AP - 00190109 10/30/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,341.00
AP - 00190109 10/30/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 945.33
AP - 00190109 10/30/2002 ARCHITERKA DESIGN GROUP 637.14
AP - 00190110 10/30/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 16.00
AP - 00190111 10/30/2002 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION 845.00
AP - 00190112 10/30/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 8,295.00
AP- 00190112 10/30/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 605.00
AP - 00190112 10/30/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 605.00
AP - 00190113 10/30/2002 AUSTIN, DONNA 100.00
AP - 00190114 10/30/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 92.13
AP - 00190114 10/30/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 369.14
AP - 00190114 10/30/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 63.99
AP - 00190114 10/30/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 141.58
AP - 00190114 10/30/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 86.90
AP - 00190115 10/30/2002 BALENSIEFER, ANNE 10.00
AP - 00190116 10/30/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 3,300.00
AP- 00190116 10/30/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,890.00
AP - 00190117 10/30/2002 BERNELL HYDRAULICS ][NC 14.34
AP - 00190118 10/30/2002 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORP 75.32
AP - 00190119 10/30/2002 BUCHANAN, JANICE 12.11
AP - 00190120 10/30/2002 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38
AP- 00190121 10/30/2002 CAL WESTERN PAINT 2,020.31
AP-00190122 10/30/2002 CALSENSE 161.49
AP-00190122 10/30/2002 CALSENSE 527.20
AP - 00190123 10/30/2002 CAMP FIRE BOYS AND GIRLS 6,700.00
AP- 00190124 10/30/2002 CAPE 2003 CONFERENCE 150.00
AP - 00190125 10/30/2002 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. 90.50
AP- 00190126 10/30/2002 CCAPA 65.00
AP - 00190127 10/30/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 220.00
AP - 00190127 10/30/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 972.08
AP- 00190127 10/30/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 660.00
AP - 00190127 10/30/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 660.00
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 282.84
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 1,215.29
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 21.78
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 368.03
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 55.30
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 39.75
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 21.78
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 39.75
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP- 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 29.75
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 802.74
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 21.78
AP - 00190128 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED AUTO CARE 80.04
AP- 00190129 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED TOWING 404.00
AP- 00190129 10/30/2002 CERTIFIED TOWING 404.00
AP - 00190130 10/30/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 5.63
AP- 00190131 10/30/2002 CITY RENTALS 25.00
AP- 00190132 10/30/2002 CLARK, NANCY 105.00
AP - 00190133 10/30/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 93.07
AP - 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 1,574.21
AP - 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 76.00
AP- 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 152.00
AP - 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 3,148.46
AP - 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 1,574.23
AP- 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 76.00
AP- 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 76.00
AP - 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 61.42
AP- 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 152.00
AP- 00190134 10/30/2002 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION 3,148.46
AP- 00190135 10/30/2002 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATES 508.40
AP- 00190136 10/30/2002 COVERMASTER [NC 255.00
AP- 00190137 10/30/2002 CPRS DISTRICT XIlI 75.00
AP- 00190138 10/30/2002 CSMFO 100.00
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 640.00
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 177.17
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 192.96
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 182.68
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 576.14
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 35.38
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 124.64
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 53.92
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 108.37
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 241.03
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 53.78
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 97.17
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,467.65
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,786.43
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 150.06
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 380.08
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 191.95
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 51.72
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 20.96
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 196.06
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 87.77
User: ahunsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 11/13/5
Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 t~ough 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 71.29
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 303.19
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 44.51
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 143.18
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 252.72
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 123.97
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 178.56
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 191.95
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER D1ST 417.16
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 670.90
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 125.88
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 604.62
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 318.28
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 413.04
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 249.27
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 247.2t
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 243.09
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 412.01
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 120.73
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 314A6
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,477.52
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,729.75
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,154.10
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 109.19
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 71.63
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,442.11
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 568.93
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,278.55
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,411.47
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,468.79
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 471.75
AP- 00190141 t0/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 432.97
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,027.28
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 719.31
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,456.46
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 240.00
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,924.41
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 121.91
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 747.12
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 826.07
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 29.20
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 28.17
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 468.66
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 904.71
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 156.78
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 534.58
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 407.22
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 730.64
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,685.45
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 435.70
AP ~ 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,748.28
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,749.31
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,615.54
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 683.26
User: ahunsber - Ann Htmsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report: CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
lO
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 948.64
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,958.40
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,572.15
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 146.97
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,286.45
AP- 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 833.28
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 104.04
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,172.87
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 128.43
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 249.63
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 62.02
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 187.68
AP ~ 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 408.92
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 105.07
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 178.56
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 165.02
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 848.06
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,107.47
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 331.00
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 361.90
AP - 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 69.57
AP ~ 00190141 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,127.19
AP - 00190142 10/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 700.00
AP - 00190143 10/30/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 179.40
AP - 00190143 10/30/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 145.46
AP - 00190143 10/30/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 161.63
AP- 00190144 10/30/2002 DANKO INC 1,175.19
AP- 00190145 10/30/2002 DATA QUICK 91.17
AP - 00190146 10/30/2002 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 6,666.07
AP - 00190146 10/30/2002 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 1,563.18
AP- 00190147 10/30/2002 DEPARTMENT ISSUE 366.35
AP - 00190148 10/30/2002 DIEHL EVANS AND COMPANY LLP 107.75
AP - 00190149 10/30/2002 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 169.42
AP - 00190149 10/30/2002 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 293.71
AP- 00190150 10/30/2002 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 6,848.59
AP - 00190151 10/30/2002 EAGLE LIFT 1NC 500.00
AP - 00190152 10/30/2002 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 1,081.81
AP- 00190153 10/30/2002 ELITE TOWING 60.00
AP- 00190154 10/30/2002 EMBLETON, TERRY 67.50
AP- 00190154 10/30/2002 EMBLETON, TERRY 50.63
AP- 00190155 10/30/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 890.46
AP- 00190156 10/30/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 40.56
AP - 00190157 10/30/2002 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 1,645.23
AP- 00190158 10/30/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.06
AP - 00190158 10/30/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.90
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 441.60
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 710.97
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 87.75
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 701.86
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 588.80
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 465.30
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 11/13/,~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
II
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 429.00
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 341.25
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 419.25
AP- 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20
AP - 00190159 10/30/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP- 00190160 10/30/2002 FLEET REFINISHING 480.32
AP- 00190160 10/30/2002 FLEET REFINISHING 215.85
AP - 00190161 10/30/2002 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 250.00
AP - 00190162 10/30/2002 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 60.66
AP - 00190163 10/30/2002 GRANITE STATE BANK 30.00
AP - 00190164 10/30/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 235.13
AP - 00190164 10/30/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 229.35
AP- 00190165 10/30/2002 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORMS 138.35
AP- 00190166 10/30/2002 HAWORTH, ANN 35.00
AP - 00190167 10/30/2002 HIGHLAND, DARCY 115.00
AP - 00190168 10/30/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00190168 10/30/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 189.37
AP- 00190169 10/30/2002 HOLT, CURTIS 120.00
AP- 00190169 10/30/2002 HOLT, CURTIS 10.00
AP - 00190170 10/30/2002 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 156.24
AP - 00190170 10/30/2002 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 107.75
AP- 00190171 10/30/2002 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00
AP- 00190172 10/30/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 69.82
AP - 00190172 10/30/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 30.55
AP- 00190173 10/30/2002 ICMA 669.00
AP - 00190174 10/30/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 160.80
AP - 00190175 10/30/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60
AP - 00190175 10/30/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60
AP - 00190175 10/30/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60
AP- 00190175 10/30/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 78.60
AP- 00190176 10/30/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 289.33
AP- 00190176 10/30/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 361.00
AP - 00190177 10/30/2002 J.G. TUCKER AND SONS INC. 211.09
AP - 00190178 10/30/2002 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC 325.19
AP - 00190179 10/30/2002 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,250.00
AP - 00190180 10/30/2002 JONS FLAGS AND POLES 36.10
AP - 00190181 10/30/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 299.79
AP - 00190182 10/30/2002 KELLY EQUIPMENT 59.11
AP - 00190183 10/30/2002 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 11,200.00
AP - 00190184 10/30/2002 KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION 74.00
AP - 00190185 10/30/2002 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORATION 123.91
AP - 00190186 10/30/2002 LAIDLAW TRANSIT 1NC 644.06
AP - 00190187 10/30/2002 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 13,532.15
AP- 00190188 10/30/2002 LAM, JACK 34.41
AP- 00190189 10/30/2002 LAM, JACK 100.00
AP - 00190190 10/30/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 29.80
AP ~ 00190190 10/30/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 609.63
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 150.00
AP- 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 132.99
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 122.27
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 96.49
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 11/13/2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
12.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 105.91
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 105.91
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 2,578.22
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 149.08
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 91.65
AP- 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 150.00
AP- 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 150.00
AP- 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 122.27
AP - 00190191 10/30/2002 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE COMPANY 150.00
AP- 00190192 10/30/2002 LIFE ASSIST 781.85
AP - 00190193 10/30/2002 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN 25.00
AP - 00190193 10/30/2002 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN 25.00
AP - 00190194 10/30/2002 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN 25.00
AP - 00190194 10/30/2002 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN 25.00
AP- 00190195 10/30/2002 LOVE IMPROVEMENTS 60.50
AP - 00190196 10/30/2002 LUDWIG KLEIN REPORTERS & VIDEO INC 171.00
AP- 00190197 10/30/2002 MAGANA, ROBERT 70.00
AP- 00190198 10/30/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 649.18
AP- 00190199 10/30/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00190199 10/30/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00190199 10/30/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00190200 10/30/2002 MASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 395.11
AP- 00190201 10/30/2002 MCGRUFF SAFE KIDS 396.55
AP - 00190202 10/30/2002 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 201.81
AP - 00190202 10/30/2002 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 268.91
AP - 00190203 10/30/2002 MEISNER, CHARLES 60.00
AP- 00190203 10/30/2002 MEISNER, CHARLES 30.00
AP - 00190204 10/30/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50
AP - 00190204 10/30/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50
AP- 00190205 10/30/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 47.97
AP- 00190205 10/30/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 287.88
AP- 00190206 10/30/2002 MITCH GORDIEN 500.00
AP - 00190207 10/30/2002 MOBILE MINI 1NC 130.38
AP - 00190207 10/30/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46
AP - 00190208 10/30/2002 MONTE CARLO RESORT & CASINO 107.91
AP - 00190209 10/30/2002 MORALES, LUZ 60.00
AP - 00190210 10/30/2002 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC 805.61
AP- 00190210 10/30/2002 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC 828.60
AP - 00190211 10/30/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW CHEVROLET 1,000.00
AP - 00190212 10/30/2002 MOUNTAFN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 11.83
AP - 00190212 10/30/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 68.83
AP - 00190213 10/30/2002 MULDOON, BRYAN 30.00
AP- 00190214 10/30/2002 MUNSON, MICHELLE 200.00
AP- 00190215 10/30/2002 NANCE, ROSARIO 65.00
AP- 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 29.93
AP- 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.02
AP- 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 28.98
AP - 00190216 t0/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -1.95
AP - 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 45.19
AP - 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.16
AP - 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 25.25
AP- 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -2.16
AP - 00190216 10/30/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.24
AP- 00190217 10/30/2002 NAPIERALA, JAMES 200.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190218 10/30/2002 NATIONS RENT 70.04
AP- 00190218 10/30/2002 NATIONS RENT 10.78
AP- 00190219 10/30/2002 NIGRO, ANDREE 600.00
AP - 00190220 10/30/2002 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 62.10
AP - 00190220 10/30/2002 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 375.33
AP- 00190220 10/30/2002 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 387.54
AP- 00190220 10/30/2002 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 137.84
AP - 00190220 10/30/2002 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 89.88
AP - 00190221 10/30/2002 OCEAN HILLS INC 5,140.96
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 12.76
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 33.44
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 15.56
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 15.55
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 29.62
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 26.59
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 255.24
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 2.97
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 27.96
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 289.10
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 71.08
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 150.18
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 6.82
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 20.73
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -18.10
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -6.87
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 107.56
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 5.90
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 57.81
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 29.88
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -38.47
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 33.13
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -65.16
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 1.20
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 6.29
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -27.85
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 27.85
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 123.64
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 364.67
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 39.50
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 69.60
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 144.53
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -30.65
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 762.76
AP- 00190222 10/30/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 89.93
AP - 00190223 10/30/2002 ORANGE PRODUCTS CORP 1,228.17
AP- 00190224 10/30/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 29.89
AP - 00190224 10/30/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 207.40
AP- 00190225 10/30/2002 PAGE, JEANETTE 72.00
AP- 00190226 10/30/2002 PARSAC 23,846.47
AP - 00190227 10/30/2002 PARSONS BRINKERHOFF QUADE AND DOUGL/ 10,976.52
AP-00190228 10/30/2002 PASMA 75.00
AP- 00190228 10/30/2002 PASMA 75.00
AP - 00190229 10/30/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,116.74
AP - 00190230 10/30/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 363.96
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 11/13/3
Repor t:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time~ 41:3.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11 / 12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190230 10/30/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 561.29
AP - 00190230 10/30/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 884.55
AP - 00190230 10/30/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 540.70
AP - 00190231 10/30/2002 PLANNING EVNIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LL 1,000.00
AP - 00190232 10/30/2002 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR, 715.50
AP - 00190233 10/30/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 60.12
AP- 00190234 10/30/2002 PORTOSAN 956.04
AP- 00190235 10/30/2002 POWER PLUS 40.00
AP- 00190236 10/30/2002 PRESENTATION SYSTEMS INC 20,297.53
AP- 00190237 10/30/2002 RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO 257.86
AP - 00190238 10/30/2002 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 163.97
AP - 00190239 10/30/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDA~ 25.00
AP - 00190240 10/30/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 3,000.00
AP- 00190240 10/30/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00
AP - 00190241 10/30/2002 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 23.86
AP- 00190242 10/30/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 122.73
AP- 00190243 10/30/2002 KH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00
AP- 00190243 10/30/2002 KH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00
AP- 00190243 10/30/2002 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00
AP- 00190244 10/30/2002 RIDGELINE ROOFING 1,213.98
AP- 00190245 10/30/2002 RIGEL PRODUCTS AND SERVICE 4,627.86
AP- 00190246 10/30/2002 RMA GROUP 2,586.00
AP- 00190246 10/30/2002 RMA GROUP 598.50
AP- 00190247 10/30/2002 ROBERTS, LORI 38.00
AP- 00190248 10/30/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 64.00
AP- 00190248 10/30/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 55.50
AP - 00190248 10/30/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 52.50
AP - 00190249 10/30/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 226.77
AP - 00190249 10/30/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 190.40
AP- 00190250 10/30/2002 ROWLEN, ALISON 54.94
AP - 00190251 10/30/2002 S B AND O INC 4,652.50
AP - 00190252 10/30/2002 S R CONSULTANTS 33,965.00
AP- 00190253 10/30/2002 SALAZ,JOAN 120.00
AP - 00190254 10/30/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY OFFICE OF TREASURER-T/ 78.10
AP- 00190255 10/30/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 1,248.00
AP- 00190256 10/30/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 1,500.00
AP - 00190257 10/30/2002 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 24,040.00
AP - 00190258 10/30/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 191.80
AP- 00190259 10/30/2002 SANCHEZ, JOE 53.92
AP- 00190260 10/30/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 55.07
AP- 00190260 10/30/2002 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 55.07
AP- 00190261 10/30/2002 SCHUMANN,JAN 108.00
AP- 00190262 10/30/2002 SCOTT, CHARLES 200.00
AP - 00190263 10/30/2002 SEA BREEZE MORTGAGE SERVICES INC 100.00
AP- 00190264 10/30/2002 SHERATON GRAND 157.88
AP - 00190265 10/30/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 276.00
AP - 00190265 10/30/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 276.00
AP- 00190265 10/30/2002 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING LLC 295.00
AP- 00190266 10/30/2002 SIGN SHOP, THE 121.87
AP- 00190266 10/30/2002 SIGN SHOP, THE 129.30
AP - 00190267 10/30/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION 1NC -27,568.01
AP- 00190267 10/30/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 156,875.30
AP- 00190268 10/30/2002 SIPHOMSAY, SID 200.00
AP- 00190269 10/30/2002 SIR SPEEDY 5.39
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 11/13/3
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
/5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190270 10/30/2002 SMITH BROTHERS GLASS 1,316.21
AP - 00190271 10/30/2002 SO CAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT 1,000.00
AP- 00190272 10/30/2002 SORRELL, JODI 291.50
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 112.91
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.36
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.08
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.27
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I4.16
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.85
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.88
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.59
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.12
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.32
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 'SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.73
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CAL. IFORNIAEDISON 62.63
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CAL1FORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.30
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALtFORNIA EDISON 165.54
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.07
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 182.08
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.30
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.61
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.14
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.33
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.62
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.86
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.74
AP 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.49
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.95
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.32
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.12
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.13
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 597.02
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 984.75
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.03
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.26
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.12
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.64
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.44
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.20
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.41
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,839.98
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167.68
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 346.60
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.22
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 614.45
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 261.85
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 266.85
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.20
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.84
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I38.61
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON t67.71
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.21
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.86
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.11
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.06
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.99
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.90
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.13
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.85
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 860.78
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.49
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOKNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.62
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.77
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.75
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.08
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 1 t/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
/7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.49
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.26
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.12
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.49
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.64
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.27
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.15
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.42
AP- 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45
AP - 00190276 10/30/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99
AP- 00190277 10/30/2002 SPECTRA COMPANY 1,275.00
AP- 00190277 10/30/2002 SPECTRA COMPANY 6,950.00
AP - 00190278 10/30/2002 SPECTRA CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICES 3,800.00
AP- 00190279 10/30/2002 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33
AP- 00190279 10/30/2002 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 1,382.87
AP - 00190280 10/30/2002 STORYTELLERS & TROUABADOURS UNLMTD 300.00
AP- 00190281 10/30/2002 STOVER SEED COMPANY 2,500.00
AP- 00190281 10/30/2002 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,055.75
AP - 00190282 10/30/2002 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 200.00
AP- 00190283 10/30/2002 SUNRISE FORD 23.32
AP- 00190284 10/30/2002 TARGET 68.25
AP- 00190285 10/30/2002 TARGET 92.15
AP - 00190286 10/30/2002 TAYLOR DUNN 16,927.47
AP - 00190287 10/30/2002 TETRA TECH ASL INC 12,113.00
AP- 00190288 10/30/2002 TOY, MIKE 40.00
AP- 00190289 10/30/2002 TOY, MIKE 200.00
AP - 00190290 10/30/2002 TRAINING NETWORK, THE 247.42
AP - 00190291 10/30/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 11,082.50
AP - 00190291 10/30/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,932.50
AP - 00190292 10/30/2002 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 287.50
AP - 00190293 10/30/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.34
AP - 00190293 10/30/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27
AP- 00190293 10/30/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 72.81
AP - 00190293 10/30/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58
AP - 00190293 10/30/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 117.30
AP - 00190293 10/30/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 565.40
AP- 00190294 10/30/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 27.41
AP - 00190295 10/30/2002 US GUARDS CO 1NC 6,192.75
AP- 00190295 10/30/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 5,382.01
AP - 00190295 10/30/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 1,840.00
AP- 00190296 10/30/2002 US HOMES 1,450.13
AP- 00190297 10/30/2002 VASQUEZ, ELSY 38.00
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 25.01
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 11/13/2
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Che6k No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.55
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 24.34
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 31.77
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 31.79
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.33
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.11
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 56.22
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 126.67
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 24.59
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 25.86
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 24.67
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 46.99
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VEKIZON CALIFORNIA 69.93
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 57.27
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 66.20
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.68
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 465.92
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VER1ZON CALIFORNIA 77.75
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 86.22
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 149.88
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 380.69
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.71
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 38.71
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.85
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.86
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.85
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.86
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.86
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VEKIZON CALIFORNIA 28.11
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.57
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.37
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.83
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 92.68
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.86
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.85
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.86
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 84.98
AP - 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 33.82
AP- 00190299 10/30/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 87.30
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 57.70
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 12.74
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 42.62
AP - 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 6.11
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VEKIZON WIRELESS 13.23
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 21.28
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 82.06
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 56.31
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 39.93
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.77
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 61.19
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 40.95
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 151.08
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
tq
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 24.88
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.49
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 67.41
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 43.49
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 12.86
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.64
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 61.49
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.53
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 47.99
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 38.76
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 26.43
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 49.20
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 44.71
AP- 001~0302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 134.53
AP - 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 11.49
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 65.08
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERiZON WIRELESS 95.13
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 65.02
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.31
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 120.61
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 33.55
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 36.18
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERiZON WIRELESS 15.67
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 28.58
AP - 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 36.16
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 3.59
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 36.29
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VER1ZON WIRELESS 36.91
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 106.49
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 23.72
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 7.98
AP - 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 47.74
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 15.66
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 7.75
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 227.16
AP - 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 71.74
AP - 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.11
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 69.95
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 3.39
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VER1ZON WIRELESS 124.41
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 61.16
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 24.01
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 68.56
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZONW1RELESS 40.27
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 22.45
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VEKIZONWIRELESS 18.5l
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 11.84
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.97
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 35.21
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 10.88
AP 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 21.66
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 7.11
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 34.59
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 76.93
User: ahunsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 11/13/7,
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 13.86
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 63.33
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 84.42
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 23.83
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.12
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 152.35
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 20.76
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 20.87
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 22.51
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 2.33
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZONWIRELESS 4.00
AP- 00190302 10/30/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 20.74
AP- 00190303 10/30/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00
AP- 00190304 10/30/2002 VILLEGAS, TONY 350.00
AP- 00190305 10/30/2002 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 834.54
AP - 00190306 10/30/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 254.05
AP- 00190306 10/30/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 206.38
AP- 00190307 10/30/2002 WAXIE 597.38
AP-00190307 10/30/2002 WAXIE 233.06
AP- 00190307 10/30/2002 WAXIE 164.32
AP - 00190308 10/30/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 1,750.00
AP - 00190308 10/30/2002 WELLS FARGO BANK 1,750.00
AP- 00190309 10/30/2002 WHOLE ENCHILADA,THE 233.83
AP- 00190310 10/30/2002 WILLIAMS, VANESSA 200.00
AP - 00190311 10/30/2002 WOJCIK, ROBERT 1,000.00
AP- 00190312 10/30/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 166.47
AP- 00190312 10/30/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 9,550.76
AP- 00190313 10/30/2002 YI,CARINA 72.56
AP-00190313 10/30/2002 YI,CARINA 15.00
AP- 00190314 10/31/2002 CONCRETE CREATIONS 2,215.25
AP- 00190324 10/31/2002 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP- 00190327 10/31/2002 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP- 00190328 10/31/2002 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 215.10
AP - 00190344 10/31/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00
AP - 00190347 10/31/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 7,697.89
AP - 00190352 10/31/2002 RCPFA 4,149.82
AP - 00190359 10/31/2002 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 331.11
AP- 00190365 10/31/2002 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 6,774.30
AP - 00190370 11/6/2002 3M COMPANY 97.43
AP - 00190371 11/6/2002 A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB 1NC 24.38
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 29.48
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.46
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 36.94
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 486.62
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00
AP 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 486.30
AP 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND RT1RE SERVICE 69.06
AP 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE t25.67
AP 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 31.60
AP 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 31.60
AP 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 29.48
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 591.73
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 41.31
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.80
User: ahnnsber- Ann Hnnsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
2!
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 445.07
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND P, TIRE SERVICE 63.20
AP- 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.80
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 63.20
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,009.64
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 457.14
AP - 00190372 11/6/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 53.69
AP - 00190373 11/6/2002 A JONTUE, ROSEANN 3,296.10
AP - 00190374 11/6/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 275.93
AP - 00190374 11/6/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO [NC 17.95
AP- 00190375 11/6/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 3.23
AP- 00190375 11/6/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 138.01
AP- 00190375 11/6/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 243.49
AP- 00190376 11/6/2002 ABLAC 294.06
AP - 00190377 11/6/2002 ABRAMS MAH AND KAHN REPORTING SERVIC 265.50
AP - 00190378 11/6/2002 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT [NC 284.46
AP- 00190379 11/6/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,184.00
AP - 00190380 11/6/2002 ADVANCED EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTS 140.90
AP - 00190381 11/6/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 330.32
AP- 00190382 11/6/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 156.75
AP- 00190382 11/6/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 18.10
AP- 00190383 11/6/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 45.65
AP- 00190383 11/6/2002 AMAZON.COM CREDIT 80.76
AP - 00190384 11/6/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,374.60
AP - 00190384 11/6/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 2,097.04
AP - 00190384 11/6/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 180.00
AP - 00190385 11/6/2002 ASIAN GROCERY AND SPICES 110.00
AP- 00190386 11/6/2002 ASSI SECURITY 105.00
AP - 00190387 11/6/2002 AT AND T WIRELESS SERVICES 10.00
AP - 00190388 11/6/2002 ATKINSON BAKER [NC 131.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,305.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 825.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,095.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,345.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,092.50
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 545.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPOKATION 230.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 825.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 425.00
AP - 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 340.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 4,085.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAUCORPORATION 545.00
AP - 00190389 1 I/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,092.50
AP - 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPOP,~.TION 5,340.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,005.00
AP- 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,290.00
AP - 00190389 11/6/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 510.00
AP - 00190390 11/6/2002 AUTO SPECIALISTS 112.50
AP - 00190391 11/6/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,538.67
AP - 00190392 11/6/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 238.90
AP- 00190392 11/6/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 148.64
AP - 00190393 11/6/2002 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 3.06
AP - 00190394 11/6/2002 BIG EVENTS [NC 7,250.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 11/13/5
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190395 11/6/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE [NC 555.12
AP - 00190395 11/6/2002 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 380.69
AP- 00190396 11/6/2002 BOWERY, ROBERT 193.04
AP- 00190397 11/6/2002 BKAUGHTON, JOHN 162.60
AP - 00190398 11/6/2002 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38
AP- 00190399 11/6/2002 CALSENSE 161.49
AP - 00190400 11/6/2002 CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 473.00
AP- 00190401 11/6/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 167.66
AP- 00190402 11/6/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72
AP - 00190403 11/6/2002 CHAREST, SHELLY 62.00
AP - 00190404 11/6/2002 CHURCH OF GOD PROPHECY, THE 75.00
AP- 00190405 11/6/2002 CICAMA 49.00
AP - 00190406 11/6/2002 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES [NC 15,773.00
AP - 00190407 11/6/2002 COLE, N[NA 10.26
AP- 00190408 11/6/2002 COLLETTE, PETE 10.00
AP - 00190409 11/6/2002 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 1,011.58
AP- 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 5,644.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 5,644.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00
AP- 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 126.15
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 463.50
AP - 00190410 1 I/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 56.05
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 86.00
AP - 00190410 1 l/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 71.50
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 51.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 71.50
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 75.84
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 156.55
AP- 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 75.84
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 75.84
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 274.79
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 86.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 909.28
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 248.99
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 75.84
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 43.00
AP - 00190410 11/6/2002 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 490.00
AP - 00190411 1 I/6/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50
AP 00190412 11/6/2002 CONSULTING GROUP, THE 139.00
AP 00190412 11/6/2002 CONSULT1NGGROUP, THE 225.00
AP 00190413 11/6/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00
AP 00190413 11/6/2002 COPP CRUSHING COILP, DAN 40.00
AP 00190414 11/6/2002 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS [NC 1,800.00
AP 00190415 11/6/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50
AP - 00190416 11/6/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00
AP- 00190417 11/6/2002 COX, JACQUIE 5.37
AP- 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,553.15
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
23
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 123.82
AP - 00190419 1'1/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 175.47
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 139.06
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 272.29
AP- 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 65.93
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 649.69
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,054.73
AP ~ 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 69.02
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 727.19
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 18.40
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 521.19
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 83.65
AP- 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,962.52
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 331.00
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 69.02
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 28.17
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 116.74
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 128.07
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 36.80
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 313.49
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 304.13
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 560.33
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 480.35
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 63.05
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 150.39
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 92.92
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 47.60
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 153.84
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 38.47
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 23.02
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 32.29
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,001.79
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 136.89
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 343.70
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 8,290.44
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 125.67
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 98.89
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 68.20
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCANIONGA CO WATER DIST 68.20
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 94.98
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 53.78
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 142.51
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 172.37
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 180.62
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 126.91
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 32.29
AP - 00190419 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 182.68
AP - 00190420 11/6/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,382.50
AP- 00190421 11/6/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 699.30
AP- 00190421 11/6/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 397.60
AP - 00190421 11/6/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 324.87
AP - 00190421 11/6/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 356.65
AP- 00190422 11/6/2002 DAVILA, JOHNNIE 34.00
AP - 00190423 11/6/2002 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 1,625.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190424 11/6/2002 DICK, ERIC 320.00
AP- 00190425 11/6/2002 DIEHL EVANS AND COMPANY LLP 175.00
AP - 00190425 1 I/6/2002 DIEHL EVANS AND COMPANY LLP 175.00
AP - 00190426 11/6/2002 DOLLAR RENT A CAR 101.18
AP - 00190427 11/6/2002 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC 188.68
AP - 00190428 11/6/2002 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 2,532.12
AP- 00190429 11/6/2002 ESGIL COKPORATION 39,150.42
AP - 00190430 11/6/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 105.07
AP - 00190430 11/6/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 51.92
AP - 00190430 11/6/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 162.20
AP - 00190431 11/6/2002 EZ RENTALS 674.56
AP - 00190432 11/6/2002 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 1,480.96
AP- 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 441.60
AP- 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 662.40
AP - 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 496.80
AP - 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 671.50
AP - 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00
AP - 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 588.80
AP - 00190433 11/6/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00
AP - 00190434 11/6/2002 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 867.39
AP - 00190435 11/6/2002 FORECAST COMM RYE SVC INC 63.00
AP - 00190436 11/6/2002 G AND F HORSE TRAILERS 1,590.00
AP- 00190437 11/6/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 148.43
AP- 00190437 11/6/2002 GALE GROUP,THE -14.55
AP - 00190437 11/6/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 55.10
AP- 00190437 11/6/2002 GALE GROUP,THE 134.59
AP- 00190438 11/6/2002 GARCIA, CHRISTINA 43.00
AP- 00190439 11/6/2002 GARCIA, VIVIAN 28.84
AP- 00190440 11/6/2002 GEMBELLA, LORI 14.73
AP - 00190441 11/6/2002 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 233.28
AP - 00190441 11/6/2002 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 534.44
AP- 00190442 11/6/2002 GKAINGER, WW 18.12
AP - 00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 35.31
AP- 00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 38.23
AP-00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 362.84
AP-00190442 11/6/2002 GKAINGER WW 34.87
AP- 00190442 11/6/2002 GKAINGER WW 130.01
AP-00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 1,125.19
AP - 00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 147.42
AP - 00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 11.24
AP-00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 3.65
AP- 00190442 11/6/2002 GKAINGER WW 4.67
AP-00190442 11/6/2002 GRAINGER WW 176.28
AP - 00190443 11/6/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 55.31
AP - 00190443 11/6/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 71.69
AP - 00190443 11/6/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 14.01
AP- 00190444 11/6/2002 GUARDIAN 3,005.75
AP - 00190445 11/6/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 285.65
AP - 00190445 11/6/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 194.32
AP - 00190445 11/6/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 403.18
AP- 00190446 11/612002 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50
AP ~ 00190447 11/6/2002 HERNANDEZ, JAMES 168.00
AP- 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 35.78
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 273.70
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 11/13/2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.00
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 35.17
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 418.37
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 275.00
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 29.74
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.00
AP - 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 400.88
AP- 00190448 11/6/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 138.74
AP- 00190449 11/6/2002 HOOD, KARYE 56.03
AP- 00190450 11/6/2002 HUDDLESTON, PRISCILLA 540.00
AP - 00190451 11/6/2002 HURST, CHERYL 288.50
AP - 00190452 11/6/2002 HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 212.80
AP - 00190453 11/6/2002 HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 106.40
AP- 00190454 11/6/2002 HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 106.40
AP- 00190455 11/6/2002 HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 106.40
AP- 00190456 11/6/2002 IBM CORPORATION 13,416.62
AP- 00190457 11/6/2002 IBM CORPORATION 379.03
AP- 00190457 11/6/2002 1BM CORPORATION 417.38
AP- 00190457 11/6/2002 1BM CORPORATION 417.38
AP- 00190457 11/6/2002 IBM CORPORATION 379.03
AP- 00190457 11/6/2002 IBM CORPORATION 222.60
AP- 00190458 11/6/2002 ICBO 37.32
AP - 00190459 11/6/2002 ID BURR 673.44
AP - 00190460 11/6/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 114.94
AP - 00190461 11/6/2002 INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM 1,371.00
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 283.50
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 371.70
AP- 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 135.45
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 225.75
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 93.45
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 142.80
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 154.35
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 636.30
AP- 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 661.50
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 395.85
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 517.65
AP - 00190462 11/6/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 768.60
AP - 00190463 11/6/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 82.32
AP - 00190464 11/6/2002 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGRS 256.00
AP - 00190464 11/6/2002 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGRS 238.00
AP - 00190464 11/6/2002 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGRS 238.00
AP - 00190465 11/6/2002 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 142.75
AP - 00190466 11/6/2002 JACOBS ASSOCIATES, JOHN 225.00
AP - 00190466 11/6/2002 JACOBS ASSOCIATES, JOHN 367.74
AP- 00190467 11/6/2002 KARATSU, ROBERT 77.97
AP - 00190468 11/6/2002 KATELARIUS 1,210.00
AP- 00190469 11/6/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 869.40
AP- 00190470 11/6/2002 KRUGER, RAY 20.00
AP- 00190471 11/6/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 342.92
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 11/13/.~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 628.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 1,356.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 628.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 628.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 1,000.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWISHOMES 628.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 628.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP - 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP- 00190472 11/6/2002 LEWIS HOMES 2,500.00
AP ~ 00190473 11/6/2002 LOGUE, SALLY 11.00
AP- 00190474 11/6/2002 LOPEZ, SILVIA 40.00
AP - 00190475 11/6/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 222.49
AP- 00190476 11/6/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 36.81
AP- 00190476 11/6/2002 LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. 197.70
AP - 00190477 11/6/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00
AP- 00190478 11/6/2002 LUDWIG, CARL 318.50
AP- 00190479 tl/6/2002 MANELA, ROSIE 26.36
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 123.92
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 1,685.67
AP - 00190480 1 I/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 256.07
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 2,890.14
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 2,122.66
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 17,025.18
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 145.70
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 8,048.32
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 7,115.29
AP- 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 1,140.87
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 11,077.06
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 670.23
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 4,558.15
AP- 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 514.10
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 2,644.62
AP - 00190480 11/6/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC 3,469.80
AP- 00190481 11/6/2002 MARON, JEFF 80.00
AP- 00190482 11/6/2002 MART[NEZ UNION SERVICE 100.00
AP - 00190482 11/6/2002 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00190483 11/6/2002 McCANN, LETICIA 279.75
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 15.36
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 10.58
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 14.16
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 10.58
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 12.96
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 10.58
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 11/13/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
2.7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
A~enda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.60
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.60
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 10.58
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP- 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP- 00190484 tl/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 12.37
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.01
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 12.37
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 1.34
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 9.98
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 11.17
AP - 00190484 11/6/2002 MCI COMM SERVICE 11.17
AP- 00190485 11/6/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50
AP- 00190486 11/6/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 53.97
AP - 00190486 11/6/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 57.97
AP- 00190486 11/6/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 46.98
AP- 00190486 11/6/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 25.99
AP- 00190486 11/6/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 33.99
AP - 00190487 11/6/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 3,265.20
AP - 00190487 11/6/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 225.00
AP - 00190487 11/6/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 288.00
AP - 00190487 11/6/2002 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 450.00
AP- 00190488 11/6/2002 MISSION REPORGRAPH1CS 15.03
AP - 00190488 II/6/2002 MISSION REPORGRAPHICS 5.39
AP- 00190489 11/6/2002 MOKNINGSTAR 795.00
AP - 00190490 11/6/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 762.00
AP - 00190490 11/6/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 89.88
AP - 00190491 11/6/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 68.49
AP- 00190492 11/6/2002 MYERS, JEFF 263.32
AP - 00190493 11/6/2002 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 13.85
AP - 00190494 11/6/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.76
AP - 00190494 11/6/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 41.99
AP - 00190494 11/6/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 52.77
AP- 00190494 11/6/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -134.01
AP- 00190494 1 I/6/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 217.78
AP- 00190494 11/6/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 4.53
AP- 00190495 11/6/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,190.03
AP - 00190496 11/6/2002 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 100.00
AP - 00190496 11/6/2002 NEC BUSINESS NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 100.00
AP - 00190497 11/6/2002 NETMANAGE INC 4,800.00
AP - 00190497 11/6/2002 NETMANAGE INC 377.69
AP - 00190498 11/6/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00190498 11/6/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28
AP - 00190499 11/6/2002 NORDIC CONSTRUCTION 2,500.00
AP - 00190500 11/6/2002 OCLC INC 110.98
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 225.01
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -333.39
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 333.39
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -8.08
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -36.95
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 36.45
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 24.13
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 5.99
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -237.45
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 45.56
AP 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -6.82
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 68.43
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 12.24
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 152.43
AP - 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 10.12
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 126.20
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 473.44
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 60.26
AP - 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 112.49
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 60.25
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9,86
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 55.29
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 19.55
AP - 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 13.63
AP- 00190501 11/6/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 8.87
AP - 00190502 11/6/2002 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 26.93
AP- 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 23.14
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 103.20
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 238.07
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 52.49
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 61.25
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 102.24
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 36.74
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 100.37
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 52.74
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 79.68
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 277.97
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 84.95
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -53.85
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 166.11
AP - 00190504 1 I/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 108.71
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 53.85
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 78.54
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 55.16
AP - 00190504 1 I/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1.82
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 48.44
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 119.91
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 37.52
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 83.I7
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 31.53
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 12.02
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 37.02
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 149.59
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 20.46
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 25.11
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 29.05
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 11/13/,~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
'Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 28.39
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 39.12
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 109.83
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 68.94
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 64.56
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 55.81
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 35.27
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 153.00
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 47.38
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -238.07
AP - 00190504 11/6/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 153.00
AP - 00190505 11/6/2002 OTT, LAURA 68.25
AP- 00190505 11/6/2002 OTT, LAURA 189.00
AP- 00190505 11/6/2002 OTT, LAURA 54.00
AP- 00190506 11/6/2002 OTT, SHARON 70.00
AP- 00190506 11/6/2002 OTT, SHARON 70.00
AP 00190507 11/6/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 15.82
AP 00190507 11/6/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 133.30
AP 00190507 11/6/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 14.76
AP 00190508 11/6/2002 PEARL, CHARLATTE 18.00
AP 00190509 11/6/2002 PEP BOYS 7.52
AP 00190509 11/6/2002 PEPBOYS 26.11
AP 00190509 11/6/2002 PEPBOYS 20.43
AP 00190510 11/6/2002 PERVO PAINTCO 150.85
AP 00190510 11/6/2002 PERVO PAINT CO 2,860.02
AP 00190511 11/6/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,575.27
AP 00190511 11/6/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 1,768.44
AP 00190511 11/6/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 327.28
AP 00190511 11/6/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,492.88
AP 00190511 11/6/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,790.53
AP 00190512 11/6/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 71,385.00
AP- 00190512 11/6/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 15,463.95
AP - 00190513 11/6/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00190513 11/6/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00
AP - 00190514 11/6/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00
AP - 00190515 11/6/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 300.00
AP - 00190515 11/6/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 300.00
AP - 00190515 11/6/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00
AP - 00190515 11/6/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 300.00
AP- 00190515 11/6/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 3,526.79
AP- 00190516 11/6/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50
AP - 00190517 1 I/6/2002 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 140.49
AP - 00190517 11/6/2002 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 271.53
AP - 00190518 11/6/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 12.12
AP - 00190519 11/6/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00
AP - 00190520 11/6/2002 RIZVI, AKBAR S 47.45
AP - 00190521 11/6/2002 ROBINSON, WENDY ANNE 100.00
AP - 00190522 11/6/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 67.50
AP - 00190523 11/6/2002 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 540.00
AP- 00190523 1 I/6/2002 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 210.00
AP - 00190523 1 l/6/2002 RODGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN THEATRE LIBR 400.00
AP - 00190524 11/6/2002 RODRIQUEZ,ANDREW 72.00
AP - 00190525 11/6/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 954.80
AP - 00190525 11/6/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 285.60
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 11/13/5
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00190526 11/6/2002 S B AND O INC 4,800.00
AP 00190527 11/6/2002 SAFAVI, SARAH 293.83
AP 00190528 11/6/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 464.94
AP 00190528 11/6/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATEILIALS 232.85
AP 00190529 11/6/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 220.00
AP 00190530 11/6/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68
AP 00190531 1 I/6/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 78.00
AP 00190532 11/6/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 1,248.00
AP - 00190533 11/6/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 62.50
AP - 00190534 11/6/2002 SAPIEN, RAMON 30.00
AP - 00190535 11/6/2002 SCHLOSSER FORGE COMPANY 3,770.00
AP - 00190536 11/6/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 81.00
AP - 00190536 11/6/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 175.00
AP - 00190536 11/6/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 108.50
AP - 00190537 11/6/2002 SIGN SHOP, THE 1,162.62
AP - 00190538 11/6/2002 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,720.69
AP- 00190538 11/6/2002 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,088.28
AP - 00190539 11/6/2002 SMART AND FINAL 13.18
AP - 00190540 11/6/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 173.50
AP - 00190540 11/6/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,130.39
AP - 00190540 11/6/2002 80 CALIF GAS COMPANY 149.44
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.51
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.78
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.01
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.90
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.70
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.59
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.44
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.59
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.54
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.34
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.35
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.80
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.93
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.59
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.81
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.19
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.21
AP - 00190543 1 I/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.88
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.00
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.80
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.83
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.48
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.27
User: ahunsber - Ann Htmsberger Page: 24 Current Date: 11/13/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11 / 12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.54
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.92
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 164.12
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.74
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,702.44
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46,323.46
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 166.85
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.70
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.31
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.88
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,438.28
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,226.99
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 225.33
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.02
AP ~ 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.10
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.90
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.56
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.43
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.59
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.5I
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.48
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.29
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,733.42
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 216.09
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.90
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.80
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.28
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.64
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.32
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 178.97
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.97
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.38
AP 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08
AP- 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00190543 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 220.52
AP - 00190544 11/6/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL 1,900.00
User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 25 Current Date: 11/13L~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
$2.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 t~ough 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190545 11/6/2002 STATE OF CALIF 1,664.00
AP- 00190546 11/6/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00
AP - 00190547 11/6/2002 SUMMIT TRAINING SOURCE 99.00
AP - 00190548 11/6/2002 SUNRISE FORD 11.12
AP- 00190548 11/6/2002 SUNRISE FORD 43.12
AP- 00190548 11/6/2002 SUNRISE FORD l 1.12
AP- 00190549 11/6/2002 TAKEDA,TERRY 2.00
AP- 00190550 11/6/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 470.00
AP- 00190550 11/6/2002 TANGRAM INTERIORS 1,337.74
AP - 00190551 11/6/2002 TARGET 24.10
AP - 00190551 11/6/2002 TARGET 14.46
AP- 00190551 11/6/2002 TARGET 31.75
AP- 00190552 11/6/2002 TAULMAN,DONALD 18.00
AP- 00190553 11/6/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 250.00
AP- 00190554 11/6/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,055.00
AP- 00190554 11/6/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 220.50
AP- 00190555 11/6/2002 UMANSKY, LAUREN 20.00
AP - 00190556 11/6/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3,6tl.00
AP - 00190556 11/6/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 240.00
AP - 00190557 1 I/6/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.34
AP- 00190557 11/6/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 72.81
AP - 00190557 11/6/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 596.60
AP - 00190557 11/6/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 117.30
AP - 00190557 11/6/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58
AP - 00190557 11/6/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27
AP - 00190558 11/6/2002 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 175.09
AP - 00190559 11/6/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 23.18
AP- 00190559 11/6/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 34.82
AP- 00190559 11/6/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 52.58
AP- 00190559 11/6/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 35.77
AP- 00190560 11/6/2002 UNITED WAY 623.32
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 22.71
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 31.30
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.65
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 581.50
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.73
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 84.29
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 31.78
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VEKIZON CALIFORNIA 92.68
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.94
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.11
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 209.28
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 48.65
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.37
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 316.37
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.65
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 31.30
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.04
AP - 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.11
AP- 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 92.68
AP- 00190561 1I/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 427.24
User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 26 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORT1LAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 11:3
$$
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date yendor Name Amount
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.76
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 55.96
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 47.95
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 23.11
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 23.11
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZONCALIFORNIA 23.11
AP 00190561 11/6/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.55
AP 00190562 11/6/2002 VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS 552.67
AP 00190563 11/6/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00
AP 00190564 11/6/2002 VILLEGAS,YOLANDA 55.00
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 536.45
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 1,847.00
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 1,259.29
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 937.80
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 753.45
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 652.06
AP 00190565 11/6/2002 VINEYARD UNLIMITED 600.51
AP 00190566 11/6/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50
AP 00190567 11/6/2002 WA×IE 24.44
AP 00190567 11/6/2002 WAXIE 106.24
AP 00190567 11/6/2002 WAXIE 82.86
AP 00190567 11/6/2002 WAXIE 360.20
AP 00190567 11/6/2002 WAXIE 4.72
AP 00190567 11/6/2002 WAXIE 27.70
AP 00190568 11/6/2002 WESTEND MATERIAL SUPPLY 36.20
AP 00190569 11/6/2002 WESTGROUP PAYMENT CENTER 86.20
AP 00190569 11/6/2002 WESTGROUP PAYMENT CENTER 129.30
AP 00190570 11/6/2002 WEST GROUP 120.68
AP 00190571 11/6/2002 WHITE,HAROLD 125.00
AP 00190572 11/6/2002 WILSON COMPANY, HW 127.91
AP 00190573 11/6/2002 WORBY,HEATHER 94.00
AP 00190573 11/6/2002 WORBY,HEATHER 33.00
AP 00190574 11/6/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 255.00
AP 00190575 11/6/2002 YO1LK INDUSTRIES 474.10
AP 00190576 11/7/2002 CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 140,300.00
AP 00190577 11/7/2002 DANIELS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO IN( 1,000.00
AP 00190578 11/7/2002 JASKA BUILDING SYSTEMS 1,000.00
AP 00190579 11/7/2002 MICHAEL D. REED 100.00
AP 00190579 11/7/2002 MICHAEL D. REED 100.00
AP 00190580 11/7/2002 PONDEROSA ELECTRIC INC 1,000.00
AP 00190581 11/7/2002 ABLAC 16.39
AP 00190590 11/7/2002 DELTA DENTAL 28,728.00
AP 00190607 11/7/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 261.16
AP 00190619 11/7/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 121.20
AP 00190619 11/7/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 65.55
AP 00190619 11/7/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UN1ON 1,041.00
AP 00190619 11/7/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 184.68
AP 00190620 11/7/2002 SCS SERVICESINC 6,300.00
AP 00190620 11/7/2002 SCS SERVICES INC 3,000.00
AP 00190621 11/7/2002 SOUTH COAST AQMD 57.91
AP - 00190621 11/7/2002 SOUTH COAST AQMD 75.00
AP - 00190621 1 I/7/2002 SOUTH COAST AQMD 231.64
AP - 00190621 11/7/2002 SOUTH COAST AQMD 75.00
AP- 00190622 ti/7/2002 LEEDS, HELEN 100.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 27 Current Date: 11/13/~
Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
10/30/2002 through 11/12/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00190623 11/12/2002 PAGENTRY PRODUCTION 8,324.09
Total for Check ID AP: 1,404,582.18
Total for Entity: 1,404,582.18
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 28 Current Date: 11/13/2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council,
City Manager, Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY-
OWNED EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council gives approval to surplus the City owned equipment on the
attached listing, which is no longer needed, obsolete or unusable.
BACKGROUND
The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property:
materials and supplies, and capital equipment. It is the policy of the City to request that
the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Agent to dispose of City
property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transferred to
another department, trade-in, sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply
trashing.
As the replacement of various pieces of equipment has occurred, the miscellaneous items
listed are surplus to the City's need and should be disposed of.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Attachments
cc: Sharon Leonard
T H E C I T Y 0 F
~ANCHO C~CAMONGA
Unit Asset Description Manufacturer Model Year VIN
524 972 F250 Dump Bed Ford F-250 1989 1FTHF25MXKPA23000
691 1313 F-250 Dump Bed Ford F-250 1991 2FTHF25M2MCA35386
1642 1958 Mobil M9B Street SweeperAthey M9B 1994 1A9T25DBXRR059005
1643 1992 Street Sweeper, Air Schwartz 7000 1995 1HTSDAAN7TH300480
1644 1903 Mobil M9B Street SweeperAthey M9B 1994 1A9T25DB1RR059006
539 970 Tractor John Doere 2155 1989 L02L55G653818
E6009 ???? Grinder Edco TLR7-B ???? 1136
530 515 Reel Mower Jacobson Tri King 1987 1668
E6496 ???? Grinder Von Arx FR-200 1989 551
548 ???? Field Rake Smithco ZB600 1992 DSR106
N/A N/A S-10 pick-up shell 1996 N/A
N/A N/A S-10 pick-up shell 1996 N/A
Surplus Inventory 9~25~02
CHAIRS MISC EQUIPMENT
Panasonic 5 SB8AA05630
Draftmaster #000502 None Disc CD Rom & Model SQ-
Changer TC520N
Lobby Chairs Plotter Calcomp #65004 P/N Dictaphone 2730118757
) Model 10440T None
20380-101-000 & P/N 860015
Desk Chairs Ref. rigerator #00025 Calculator
w/adj. Arms Lrg "Kelvinator & Old None 50800234
Masterpiece" RC#
E 136
Desk Chairs Stair stepper None None IBM Harddrive #000039 26-BO540
w/adj. Arms Sm Precor USA 7,4
Chairs w/no arms Leg Extension #001429 Box of Misc
but adj. W/lever David 200 #001430& None Office supplies None None
arms IBM Notebook Box of
Steelcase
w/adapter 23-BZM95 and articulating None
#01368 adapter Keyboard trays
#8095791
under mount
Desk chairs Server NBI Xerox XC1255
w/black arms not System 64 #00463 452571 65992
adj. Seat is
adjustable
Tall adjustable Data Printer by #00274 Xerox Pro 535
back stool w/arms Local data Inc. & old RC None #000258
Quiet 300 #E415
Tall adjustable Acco Aluminum E~rother
back stool w/no whvood None None Intellifax1150 #001513 061132100
arms appearance on
ides 2' x 2' x 3'
Executive leather Xerox Telecopier #001033 None UX- 7819087X
chair 7024 600M
Chair w/black ~/CR RCA Xerox
square frame & ~ Vision #001586 430610565 document Product Code
no wheels Workcentre Pro 4/1998
Plastic chair Panasonic Video Sharp EL-1197
(black) w/steel Monitor (still in Jill Calculator S/N
frame (square) origianl Box) None KA414051 OD088120
Model #TR-
93013
Total #: Player for Casio FR 1211
vehicle Delco Calculator
None 62999 S/N 4288452
Elect. Model
16231055
Player I LDTBO1772 I I
Staple by Stanley __.~ ~
· 107843 ~.u
M.emol
Bostitch Elec None 103562 Model 20211
Monitor risers -- ~ ~ctor!
w/keyboard tray "Kensington
Microweare
None None LTD"
W/Remote
~ Motorola DGT ! Sin ] I
9000. Desk / 740CRV10901 I I
Model I'1
Phone
#L165°A I I
7024 #000166 1[1I IPro 535 or 1
I #002084
Xerox Work #000146 Dictaphone ] I #1880901535
Pitney Bowes ~ #00326 1
Centre Pro 635
ONH 925703, ~, ,Dictaphone, #00316 0S9~01540/ 1/
3004.Xer°x Fax3002.3006 #001791 - I '1 [Pitney Bowes ~ or E-57 #188
Xerox Fax #001163 S/N ONN.23694l ~__]/~'vde.TOaster I
Audiotech ~ [ 111xor°xo00 / S/N#ONH-
:ommunications #01515 025715
Model D192
DR 128
TV Panasonic Martin Yale S/N 3441
Video #01341 S/N FE3650161 Folder 959 #01367 Barcode
196M #000152
TV Zenith Accodata
Storage
#00007 ES92 nit w/casters
Old toaster Xerox Fax 702(3
Iomega Jazz Amana P7769518M
Drive V2000S #001605 X16W1605P6 Radarange · RS415T
Micro Oven
.non S/N 200373 Omnitronix.
1510 model
Jlater CP1203D 531
Cannon MP25D Sharpe Electric
Typwriter ZX- E628 or #50655112
Broken S/N C212753 400 #00235
Sharp EL-1630 Dictaphone S/N
Calculator Pitney Bowes
Model 1350
PN878802
Elec. Stapler S/N
Stanley Bostitch Pitney Bowes #1350611541
32011
Memorex Telex ~P
Printer #001325 S/N 034588
HP Fax Pioneer Multi
S/N CD Player SCVT019115
#01189 IPA3C15070 US
Nokia Wireless San Sung Car 1 Lot
Car Kit Kits
Un[den Radio ,, Tell
Model FPH 516 Motorola ~13GSC0010
E #00835 #73000573 4
Uniden Radio Pac Tell
Model FPH 516 Motorola 313GSC0011
E #00834 #73000574 r Phone 21718
4
#S2776A
Uniden Radio Pac Tell
Model # SPH Motorola Cell 7813UW8623
58E #00629 #83001109 Phone Model 4
#1902 4
NAASB
Uniden Radio Pac Tell
Model #SPH 58E Motorola ;13GSC0012
#00628 #83001462 Phone 4
Uniden Fast LJS West Mega
Charge Battery Phone
Model #APX Cellphone 313GUU6E51
1050 Model #19066 4
WNASC
Uniden Fast Motorola
Charge Battery I lead
Model #APX
1000 Model
#SNN4298A
Uniden Rapid
IBattery Charger, Sealed Lead
lModel #APX115 #83004860 Battery
Model #SNN
4139A
Uniden Battery Pac Tell
Charger Model# Motorola 313GSC0020
APX 112 3ellphone 21717 4
Pac Tell Motorola Pac Tell
Cellular Phone Motorola
Model#S2776A #21715 313GSC00194 Cellphone 21714 313GSC0018
4
model
Pac Tell Motorol;
Cellular Phone
Model #S2776A 21716 313GSC00214 1
Pac Tell Motorola
Cellular Phone 21719 H 3GSC00124 1
Model #S2776A
Kroy Lettering
System
Keyboard
w/cassettes & #00052 17719
cartridges,
Catolog#196020
0
Disk Phone
analog push 5
~utton
HP Monitor
Model #D2805A KR33813067 1
Ergo 1024
3M Easy Clear
Monitor Glare PF500XL 1
Filter
Uniden Radio
#00599 #83001491 1
Model SPH58E
Uniden Battery
Charger Model 83000956 C
APX115
ToShiba Digital Model
Cordless Base #DK'r2004-CB
w/handset & CH
Samsung 850 RT3N620 196 1
Handsfree Kit
Samsung 850 RTIN105 1
Handsfree Kit
Cell Phone Belt New 4
Clips
Pac Tell Motorola
Cellphone model 21721 313GSC00224 1
#S2776A
OKI Telecom
CDL 410XC 1
W/Cradle
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER ROLLOUT
Product Serial Number Asset Tag ! Model #
Adtran Modem 604A-5314
Apple Laserwriter II CA043WH0%M6000 00853
Apple Laserwriter II CAD43X52%M600D
Argo Scanner 1905
Ascend Router 7235039
Ascend Router 7235040
Ascend Router 7251025
Ascend Router 7251026
Ascend Router 7251027
Ascend Router 7251028
Ascend Router 7305718
Ascend Router 73189356
Ascend Router 7355980
Asend Router 7251028
Back Up Power Source 023826
Back Up Power Source 023827
Back Up Power Source 023828
Compac LTE 286 Laptop 6019HAC31740
Compaq monitor 94614544U499
Compaq p.c. 4001H23H0751
Data Products B-1000 39306 000754
Daynafile 1.2M Floppy Drive for Macintosh DF31403
Dot Matrix Printer 2850858
Epson Printer 2YPY046240
Epson Printer 3HR1290893
Epson Printer 70002326
H,P, 14" MONITOR KR42355011 D2805A
H.P. 14" MONITOR KR42355136 ERGO 1024
-t.P. 14" MONITOR KR53964277 D2805B
H.P. 14" MONITOR KR54267354 ERGO 1024
H,P, 14" MONITOR KR54471352 D2805A
H,P. 14" MONITOR MY71595401 D2825
H,P. 14" MONITOR MY73150623 D2825
-I.P. 14" MONITOR MY73252071 D2825
-I.P. 14" MONITOR 08917400768 MC59S
H.Po 14" MONITOR OJE13002817 WY-150
H.P. 14" MONITOR TW34900176 D2801A
H.P. 15" MONITOR 0261010035
H.P. 15" MONITOR 23-49862 6553-503
H,P, 15" MONITOR 74J3003114 Z5601
;H.P. 15" MONITOR E72488
H,P. 15" MONITOR KR33711147 D2805A
H.P, 15" MONITOR KR33813073 D2805A
H,P. 15" MONITOR KR42354300 D2805A
Page1 of 9 ~tf~'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER ROI. -OUT
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR42355035 D2808A
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR42355170 D2805
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR43403043 D2805A
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR43808592 ERGO 1024
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR43808602 D2806
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR54255328 D2806B
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR60318416 D2808A
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR60395756 D2805B
H.P. 15" MONITQR KR72384884 D2805A
H.P. 15" MONITOR KR72355738 D2805A
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72397154 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72397666 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560850 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560899 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560902 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560904 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560911 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560916 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560917 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560921 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560922 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72560924 D2813
H.P. 15' MONITOR MX72560926 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72563357 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MX72563369 D2813
H.P. 15" MONITOR MY71493121 D2825
H.P. 15" MONITOR MY71493125 D2825
H.P. 15' MONITOR MY71613784 D2825
H.P. 15" MONITOR MY71613756 D2825
H.P. 15" MONITOR MY73150619 D2825
H.P. 15' MONITOR MY73150626 D2825
H.P. 15" MONITOR TW73712711 D2821
HoP. 15" MONITOR TVV73713949 D2821
H.P. 17" MONITOR CN01531480 CMC42
-I.P. 17" MONITOR CN10839273 D8904
H.P. 17" MONITOR HU84813293 D2840A
H.P. 17" MONITOR IP41512922 D2807A
-I.P. 17" MONITOR IP41512925 D2807A
H.P. 17" MONITOR IP41512931 D2807A
H.P. 17" MONITOR IP41512933 D2807
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR42355032 ERGO 1024
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR71821817 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR72134531 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR72255968 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR72525971 DELTA 2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR74846920 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR74846923 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR74846958 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR74846975 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR75083310 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR P~i3~' Y,~7.~202136 D2835
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER ROI. '.OUT
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR75202791 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR75202793 D2835
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR80714186 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR80714189 D28375
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR80714199 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR80828619 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR80828631 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR80828634 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR~1860428 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR81860456 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR81862099 D2737
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR81862103 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR81862267 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR81872269 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82078759 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82078763 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82087698 D2837
-I.P. 17" MONITOR KR82105151 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82105152 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82116295 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82193971 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82197912 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82197917 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82197918 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR82225796 D2837
H.P. 17' MONITOR KR82335862 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR84698065 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR84809174 D8901A
H.P. 17' MONITOR KR85116218 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR KR90840481 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX84532893 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX90636738 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX91659474 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX91763323 D2837^
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX91767604 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX91870914 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX91872497 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX91872843 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX92505017 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX92505029 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93126247 D5837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93127175 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93127178 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93127204 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93127205 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93533386 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93533428 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93533431 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MX93533435 D2837A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY00600879 D8901
H.P. 17" MONITOR Pa(]e ~(~702281 D8901A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER ROL .OUT
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY02477908 D8903A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY02573727 D8903A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY81907056 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82015622 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82019225 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82019227 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82019228 D2837
H.P. 17' MONITOR MY82019242 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITQR MY82019244 D2837
H.P, 17" MONITOR MY82125086 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82541501 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82764782 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82866085 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82870453 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY82870455 D2837
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93215290 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93407799 D8901
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93504068 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93504072 D8901^
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93504080 D8901
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93511470 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93511479 D8901A
H.P. 17' MONITOR MY93600575 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93600581 D89801A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93600606 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93600610 D8901A
H.P. 17' MONITOR MY93600614 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93600615 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93600619 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93600620 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93601167 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93601171 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93601175 D8901^
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93601176 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93601565 D8901
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93602627 D8901
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY93602704 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY94110818 D8901
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY94211871 D8901A
H.P. 17" MONITOR MY94600826 D8901A
H.P. 17' MONITOR NX92184684 D2837A
H.P. 21" Monitor MX92504979 02137 D2837A
H.P. Desi~nJet 330 Plotter ESA7530555
H.P. Deskjet SG7241C05X
H.P, Deskjet SG7241 C064
H.P. Deskiet 320 MY4952M031
H.P. Deskiet 820 SG7241C05Y 01541
H.P. Deskiet 870 C US75G1203G
H.P. Deskiet 870 C U$75U13061 22005
H.P. Deskiet 870 C U$75U13065 22003
H.P. Laser Printer P~nP, ~J[~F~024035 000151
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER RO~.~.OUT
H.P. Laser Printer JPFL011471 000263
H.P. Laser Printer JPFL011518 000265
H.P. Laser Printer JPFL015733 000267
H.P. Laser Printer JPGJ002254 000150
H.P. Laser Printer JPHK031044
H.P. Laser Printer JPHL009239 000266
H.P. Laserjet 4M+ JPFF036926
H.P. LaserJet 5 DE11844292 01762
H.P. Monitor 14" - KR33813070
H.P. Monitor 14" KR42051231
H.P. Monitor 14" KR42354854
H.P. Monitor 14" KR42355138
H.P. Monitor 14" KR43808589
H.P. Monitor 14" MY4828020
H.P. Monitor 15" KR43809491
H.P. Monitor 15" MY74957734
H.P. Monitor 17" CH84468857
H.P. Monitor 17" F174644743
H.P. Monitor 17" FI74543925
H.P. Monitor 17" IP41512931
H.P. Monitor 17" KR2116295
H.P. Monitor 17' KR72255971
H.P. Monitor 17" KR72255975
H.P. Monitor 17" KR72255977
H.P. Monitor 17" KR80714182
H.P. Monitor 17" KR80714188
H.P. Monitor 17" KR80714198
H.P. Monitor 17" KR80828633
H.P. Monitor 17" KR81860426
H.P. Monitor 17" MX92505016
H.P. Monitor 17" MX93126260
H.P. Monitor 17" MX93533326
H.P. Monitor 17" MY73150626
H.P. Monitor 17" MY82650745
H.P. Monitor 17" MY82870434
-I.P. Monitor 17" MY93403846
H.P. Monitor 17" MY93600621
H.P. Monitor 17" MY93601564
H.P. Monitor 17" MY93602696
H.P. Monitor 17" MY94200156
-I. P. Monitor 21 ' JP75117616 01692
H.P. Port Hub SG55261732
H.P. Port Hub US41200352
H.P. Port Hub US41200358
H.P. Port Hub US41200365
H.P. Port Hub US41200374
H.P. Port Hub US41200394
H.P. Port Hub US41200401
H.P. Port Hub US9200387
H.P. Router 8G42200431
H.P. Router o~,~, ~3~?.00392
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER ROI.T.OUT
H.P. Router SG42200356
H.P. Router SG42200388
H.P. Router SG4220038S
H.P. Router SG42200391
H.P. Router SG42200398
H.P. Router SG42200399
H.P. Scanner SG8BT16172
H.P. Scanner SG9551704M 22040
H.P. Ultra 1280 H.P. 17" MONITOR KR75202799
H.P. VECTRA US4228321 000322 D5052N
H.P. VECTRA US73655121 000292 D4217N
H.P. VECTRA US73655141 900293 D4217N
H.P. VECTRA US73924589 21941 [35051N
H.P. VECTRA US74220169 11671 D4593A
H.P. VECTRA US74300340 D0319 D5052N
H.P. VECTRA US74301312 ~00321 D5052N
H.P. VECTRA US74301974 000318 D5052N
H.P. VECTRA US74302009 000320 D5052N
-I.P. VECTRA US74602424 000304 D4593A
H.P. VECTRA US74602426 000301 D4593A
H.P. VECTRA US74602498 01669 D4593A
H.P. VECTRA US74602511 000303 D4593A
H.P. VECTRA US81110115 01697 D5729N
-I.P. VECTRA US81110173 01696 D5729N
H.P. VECTRA US84302371 02028 D6542N
H.P. VECTRA US85200013 01992 D6944T
H.P. Vectra - 133Mhz 3419800341
H.P. Vectra - 133Mhz 3424A04901 000116 D3157A
H.P. Vectra - 133Mhz 142A05014 01329 D3157A
H.P. Vectra VL ~420A00757 01217 [33162A
H.P. Vectra VL US71817258 ~1560
H.P. Vectra VL US71901066 ~1561
H.P. Vectra VL US71901179 91559
H.P. Vectra VL US72614880 000269
H.P. Vectra VL 4/501 3419A00363 01226 D3157A
Hitachi CD-Rom J6F039833
IBM 13" Monitor 88-MFWN6
IBM Dockin~l Station 9798578
IBM Dockin~l Station 992606719
IBM External Tape Drive 10-34140
IBM External Tape Drive MS72072657988
IBM External Hard Drive 1G023000621
IBM External Hard Drive 1G023000624
IBM External Hard Drive S7131100002269
IBM Printer 15509
IBM Remote Async Node 16 port A16Q27318-G
IBM RISC 6000 .MS70132643115
IBM Tape Library 5004079
Macintosh H.P. 15" MONITOR 70947941 M1297
Macintosh Monitor ~439215
Macintosh Monitor Parle 7p,~7~841
CITY' OF RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA 2002 CO H UT ,R RO OUT
Macintosh Monitor 7178831
Macintosh Monitor F0140VQ710
Macintosh Monitor PH941JZCA15
Macintosh P.C. F104KX8C53 00852
Macintosh P.C. F1205322C53
Macintosh P.C. FC243202C53
Macintosh Printer 1:751351 M0198
MaclntoshH.P. 15" MONITOR 5439715 M0401
MAG H.P. 14" MONITOR HD74J3003114
Motorola Modem 007527289
Motorola Modem 00952299
Motorola Modem 009527286
Motorola Modem 009527290
Motorola Modem 009527292
Motorola Modem 009527297
Motorola Modem 00952787
Motorola Modem 00952788
NEC PinWriter 6720216692 000224
Okidata Printer 605A1004228
Okidata Printer 702A1176588C 01576
Okidata Printer 80SA1004556
Pioneer CD Chan~ler 852S086
Procomm 21 Disc Chan~ler CD-Tower 01407-010000
Shiva Lan Rover 8E HE102587
Tosh. Laptop 01849017
Toshiba Dockin~l Stations 97506399702
Toshiba Dockin~l Stations 975172497/03
VECTRA 515 US62650561 01496 D4171 S
VECTRA 515 LIS63253128 01498 D4171A
VECTRA VA 6/200 US736581158 00298 )4217N
VECTRA VL 5/100 US54852818 92003 D3048A
VECTRA VL 5/100 US55057366 )1416 D38049A
VECTRA VL 5/100 US55057368 12004 D3804A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71703106 01649 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71705801 01 641 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71817218 01554 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71817258 01560 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71817295 )1555 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71817354 )00276 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71900184 000274 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71901066 01561 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71901136 000272 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71904222 000773 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71904420 000275 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US71904453 01558 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72614821 01563 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72614830 000269 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72614865 01557 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72614872 000271 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72814879 01552 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 ~,~ ~1J~7~614884 01558 D4554A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAII4ONGA 2002 COI IPUTER
VECTRA Vt 5/133 US72707114 00283 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72707229 000287 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/133 US72707358 000281 D4554A
VECTRA VL 5/166 LJS54110739 002046 7020
VECTRA VL 5/166 LIS70961127 01461 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US70961487 01460 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72100035 ,01586 D4559A
VECTRA VL 5/166 U$72100206 91582 D4559A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72100226 ~1566 D4559A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72100245 91587 D4559A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72100274 91568 D4559A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72811623 )1590 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72811642 01594 D45749
VECTRA VL 5/166 U$72811725 01591 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US72811754 01593 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/166 U$72904187 )00278 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US73311230 001746 D4592A
VECTRA VL 5/166 US82666226 01866 D4574A
VECTRA VL 5/200 US74621019 000781 D5631A
VECTRA VL 6/200 US64554481 01492 D42171
VECTRA VL 7 US81108509 01695 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81905560 01888 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81905563 01876 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 JS81905567 01870 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81905656 01883 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 U$81905695 01869 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81905700 I1898 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81905715 22015 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 U$81905809 )1877 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81905818 01872 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 U$81905867 01904 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81910532 01916 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919222 01881 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919229 01867 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919236 01910 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919304 01903 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919326 01878 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919332 01915 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 IUS81919415 01902 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 LIS81919416 01879 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919453 01911 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 U$81919467 91921 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US81919826 91882 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 U$82021988 D1851 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US82105650 01864 D5788E
VECTRA VL 7 US82165945 01844 DS?I~E
VECTRA VL 7 US82314269 )1909 DS~66F_
VECTRA VL5/133 US64963511 )1459 D4666B
VECTRA VL6 US81403492 )1761 D5735A
VECTRA VL6 U$81403503 01757 D5735A
VECTRA VL6 Parle ~ {J~°~c1403517 01756 D5736A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2002 COMPUTER RO '.r.OUT
VECTRA VL6 US81403518 01750 D5735A
VECTRA VL7 US81905755 01818 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 U$81906029 01918 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US81920926 01828 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US81920992 01820 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 U$81926977 01862 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US82000152 01839 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US82000194 01849 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US82000200 01854 D5799E
VECTRA VL7 US82000201 01852 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US82000230 01822 D5791U
VECTRA VL7 US82000233 01858 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 U$82000245 01848 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 U$82000248 01817 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US820057819 22016 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 U$82007857 01896 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 U$82016036 01847 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 U$82021964 01893 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US82021978 01863 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US82021979 01885 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US82022004 22010 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US82165348 01975 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US82666138 01864 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US83810186 000349 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 U$83816178 000352 D5791 E
VECTRA VL7 US83819897 000353 D5791E
VECTRA VL7 US83819910 000363 D5791 E
VECTRA XA 6/200 US63050440 01462 D4535N
VEXU 6/200 US72652633 01565 D4364N
World Blazer Modem 504150238
Wyse H.P. 14" MONITOR OJE13CO2817 000042
Wyse H.P. 14" MONITOR OKJ14C00227 000227 WY325ES
Wyse p.c. 17GB54200127
Wyse p.c. 7GB542127 000148 86GSI
XU6-150 SG0100201 01408 D3529N
XU6-150 SG0201276 01412 D3529N
XU6-150 SG60201344 01411 D3529N
XU6-150 SG62040992 01451 D4854
XU6-150 SG80100659 01410 D3529N
Page 9 of 9
R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, community Services Director
BY: Jeff Nimeshein, Recreation Supervisor
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION FOR POTENTIAL FUNDRAISING
ACTIVITIES BY THE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE NEW
SENIOR CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve a
proposal from the Senior Advisory Committee pertaining to fundraising activities for
furnishings for the new Senior Center at Central Park.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Ever since the City began their concerted effort to obtain funding for a new senior center,
the Senior Advisory Committee has been willing and interested in participating in the
process. During this past summer the Committee formulated a proposal for fundraising
activities that their committee members could undertake. It was determined that the goal for
their fundraising efforts would be to enhance the new Senior Center through the purchase
of furnishings for the new facility.
The cost of furnishings for the facility has been estimated to exceed $250,000. The Senior
Advisory Committee did not set an overall dollar goal for their effort, but rather identified
specific activities that the Committee itself would have the capability for carrying out. They
did however, set a two-year revenue goal for each activity they felt would be both
reasonable and attainable.
The five major fundraising activities and the associated 2-year revenue goals identified by
the Senior Advisory Committee were:
· Corporate/Business Sponsorships/Donations $50,000
,.57
· Weekly Bingo $25,000
· Private/Individual Donations including Bricks/Tiles $10,000
Partner with VIP Club Activities $ 5,000 (to go towards lobby
furniture)
· Cookbook $ 2,500
Each of the above fundraising activities will require separate sub-committees to provide
further reseamh, planning and implementation. Members of the Senior Advisory
Committee have agreed to take an active role in the fundraising by serving on one or more
of these sub-committees.
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposal presented by the Senior
Advisory Committee at their regular meeting in October 2002, and requested that their
recommendation to be forwarded to the City Council for final approval. Therefore, it is
recommended that the City Council approve the proposal from the Senior Advisory
Committee that outlines fundraising activities for furnishings for the new Senior Center at
Central Park.
Respe(,~ ~~itted,
Kevin I~ ;Ardle
Community Services Director
I:lCOMMSERVlCouncil&BoardsiCt~yCounciltStaffReportst2OO2~SAC Fundraising. 11.20.02. doc
-2-
R A N C H O' C U C A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Request for Approval and Appropriation of Funds Received from
the Department of Housing and Urban Development for a Grant in
the Amount of $50,000 for the Conceptual Design of Phase I of
the Senior Center at Central Park (Account Number
12393035650/1330239-0)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and appropriate funds received
from the Department of Housing arid Urban Development (HUD) for a grant in the
amount of $50,000 for the conceptual design of phase 1 of the senior center at
Central Park.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In Mamh 2002, the City of Rancho Cucamonga submitted an application package for
grant funding from the Economic Development Initiative (EDI) for funding in the
amount of $50,000 from the VA-HUD Independent Agencies Appropriations Act of
FY 2002 for the conceptual design process of phase 1 of the senior center facility at
Central Park. Specifically the process would include:
[] A community needs assessment
. Public input in relation to the project
Development of conceptual drawings and diagrams
n Development of spatial relationship diagrams
Development of an architectural program.
Page 2
November 20, 2002
Request for Approval and Appropriation of Funds Received from the Department of Housing
and Urban Development for a Grant In the Amount of $50,000 for the Conceptual Design of
Phase I of the Senior Center at Central Park (Account Number 12393035650/1330239
As staff has recently received paperwork announcing the approval of our application
it is recommended that the City Council approve the grant award from the
Department of Housing and Urban Development for the conceptual design of phase
1 of the senior center facility at Central Park and appropriate funds in the amount of
$50,000.
Respec 7/ d'
Kevin
Commu ~ity Services Director
hiCOMMSERV~COUNClL & BOARDStCityCouncil~StaffRepo~ls[20021HUDgrant$50,OOOSrCnt11.20. O2. doc
FY 2002 EDI-SPECIAL PROJECT NO. B-02-SP-CA-0091
GRANT AGREEMENT
This Grant Agreement between the Department of Housing and Urban
Development ("HUD") and City of Rancho Cucamonga ("The Grantee") is made
pursuant to the authority of Public Law 107-73 (the FY 2002 Appropriations Act
for HUD and other agencies) and House Report 107-272 (the Conference Report
on the Appropriations Act). The Grantee's application package, as may be
amended by the provisions of this Grant Agreement, is hereby incorporated into
this Agreement.
In reliance upon and in consideration of the mutual representations and
obligations hereunder, HUD and the Grantee agree as follows:
Subject to the provisions of the Grant Agreement, HUD will make grant
funds in the amount of $50, 000.00 available to the Grantee.
The Grantee agrees to abide by the following:
ARTICLE I. HUD Requirements.
The Grantee agrees to comply with the following requirements for which
HUD has enforcement responsibility.
A. The grant funds will only be used for activities described in the application,
which is incorporated by reference and made part of this Agreement as may
be modified by Article VII (A) of this Grant Agreement.
B. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
The grant funds must be made available in accordance with the following:
1. For projects involving housing, the requirements of the Fair Housing
Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR
Part 100; Executive Order 11063 (Equal Opportunity in Housing)
and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 107.
2. The requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 U.S.C. 2000d) (Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted
Programs) and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR Part 1.
3. The prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of age under
the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101-07) and
implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 146, and the prohibitions
against discrimination against handicapped individuals under section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and
implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 8.
4. The requirements of 24 CFR 5.105(a) regarding equal opportunity
as well as the requirements of Executive Order 11246 (Equal
Employment Opportunity) and the implementing regulations issued
at 41 CFR Chapter 60.
5. For those grants funding construction covered by 24 CFR 135, the
requirements of section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968, (12 U.S.C. 1701u) which requires that economic
opportunities generated by certain HUD financial assistance shall,
to the greatest extent feasible, be given to low- and very low-income
persons and to businesses that provide economic opportunities for
these persons.
6. The requirements of Executive Orders 11625 and 12432
(concerning Minority Business Enterprise), and 12138
(concerning Women's Business Enterprise). Consistent with
HUD's responsibilities under these Orders, the Grantee must make
efforts to encourage the use of minority and women's business
enterprises in connection with grant funded activities. See 24 CFR
Part 85.36(e), which describes actions to be taken by the Grantee to
assure that minority business enterprises and women business
enterprises are used when possible in the procurement of property
and services.
7. Where applicable, Grantee shall maintain records of its efforts to
comply with the requirements cited in Paragraphs 5 and 6 above.
C. The Grantee agrees to assume all of the responsibilities for environmental
review and decision making and actions, as specified and required in
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to the Multifamily Housing
Property Disposition Reform Act of 1994 and published in 24 CFR Part 58.
D. Administrative requirements of OMB Circular A- 133 "Audits of States,
Local governments and Non-Profit Organizations."
E. For State and Local Governments, the Administrative requirements of
24 CFR Part 85, including the procurement requirements of 24 CFR Part
85.36, and the requirements of OMB Circular A-87 regarding Cost
Principles for State and Local Governments. For Non-Profits, the
Administrative requirements of 24 CFR Part 84, including the procurement
requirements of 24 CFR Part 84.40, and OMB Circular A-122 regarding
Cost Principles for Non-Profit Institutions. For Institutions of Higher
Education the applicable OMB Circular regarding Cost Principles is A-21.
F. The regulations at 24 CFR Part 87, related to lobbying, including the
requirement that the Grantee obtain certifications and disclosures from
all covered persons.
G. Restrictions on participation by ineligible, debarred or suspended persons
or entities as described in Executive Order 12549 and at CFR 24 Part
5.105(c).
H. The Uniform Relocation Act as implemented by regulations at 49 CFR
Part 24.
I. The Grantee will comply with all accessibility requirements under section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing
regulations at 24 CFR Part 8, where applicable.
ARTICLE II. Conditions Precedent to Draw Down.
The Grantee may not draw down grant funds until the following actions have taken
place:
A. The Grantee and HUD have executed a contract.
B. The Grantee has received and approved any certifications and disclosures
required by 24 CFR 87.100 concerning lobbying and by 24 CFR 24.510(b)
regarding ineligibility, suspension and debarment.
C. Any other preconditions listed in Article VII ( C ) of this Grant Agreement.
3
ARTICLE III. Draw Downs.
A. A request by the Grantee to draw down grant funds under the Voice
Response Access system or any other payment system constitutes a
representation by the Grantee that it and all participating parties arc
complying with the terms of this Grant Agreement.
B. The Grantee will be paid on an advance basis provided that the Grantee
minimizes the time elapsing between transfer of the grant funds and
disbursement for project purposes and otherwise follows the requirements
of 24 CFR Part 85 and Treasury Circular 1075 (31 CFR Part 205).
C. Before the Grant Agreement is signed, the Grantee may incur cost for
activities which are exempt from environmental review under 24 CFR
Part 58 and may charge the costs to the grant.
ARTICLE IV. Progress Reports.
The Grantee shall submit to the Grant Officer a progress report every six
months after the effective date of the Grant Agreement. Progress reports shall
include reports on both performance and financial progress and shall conform with
24 CFR 85.40 and 85.41 or 24 CFR Sections 84.50 through 84.53, as applicable.
Additional information required or increased frequency of reporting as may be
described in Article VII ( C ).
A. The performance reports must contain the information required under 24
CFR Part 85.40(b) (2) or 24 CFR Part 84.51(a), as applicable including a
comparison ofactualaccomplishmentto the objectives indicated in the
approved application, the reasons for slippage if established objectives were
not met, and additional pertinent information including explanation of
significant cost overruns.
B. Financial reports shall be submitted on Standard Form 269A and a
breakdown in costs similar to the line items in the application budget.
C. No grant payments will be approved for projects with overdue progress
reports.
ARTICLE V. Project Close-out.
A. The Grantee shall initiate project close-out within 30 days of project
completion by submitting to HUD the Financial Status Report.
(Form 269A). Grantee shall indicate in Block 12 of SF 269A: "Ready to
initiate project close-out." HUD will then send close-out documents to the
Grantee. At HUD's option, the Grantee may delay initiation of project
close-out until the resolution of any HUD monitoring findings. If HUD
exercises this option the Grantee must promptly resolve the findings.
B. The Grantee recognizes that the close-out process may entail a review by
HUD to determine compliance with the Grant Agreement by the Grantee
and all participating parties. The Grantee agrees to cooperate with any
review in any way possible, including making available records requested
by HUD and the project for on-site HUD inspection.
C. Within 90 days of project completion, the Grantee shall provide to HUD
the following documentation., in the format approved by HUD.
1. A Certification of Project Completion (provided by HUD).
2. A Grant Close-out Agreement (provided by HUD).
3. A final financial report giving the amount and types of project costs
charged to the grant (that meet the allowability and allocability
requirements of OMB Cimular A-122 or A-87 as applicable,
including the "necessar~ and reasonable" standard); a certification of
the costs; and the amounts and sources of other project funds.
4. A final performance report providing a comparison of actual
accomplishments with each of the project commitments and
objectives in the approved application, the reasons for slippage
if established objectives were not met and additional pertinent
information including explanation of significant cost overruns.
D. The Grantee agrees that the grant funds are allowable only to the extent that
the project costs, meeting the standard of OMB Circular A-122, A-87 or
A-21 as applicable, equal the grant amount plus other sources of project
funds provided.
E. When HUD has determined that the grant funds are allowable,
the activities were completed as described by the Grant Agreement,
and all Federal requirements were satisfied, HUD and the Grantee
will sign the Close-out Agreement.
ARTICLE VI. Default.
A default under this Grant Agreement shall consist of using grant funds for
a purpose other than as authorized by this Agreement, any noncompliance with
legislative, regulatory, or other requirements applicable to the Agreement, any
other material breach of this Agreement, or any material misrepresentation in the
application submissions.
ARTICLE VII. Additional Provisions.
A. Project Description. The project is as described in the application with the
following changes: NONE
B. Changes or Clarification to the Application Related to Participating Parties:
NONE
C. Special Conditions: The grantee shall carry out such environmental review
procedures as are recommended by Ernest Molins, Environmental Officer, San
Francisco, CA telephone number (415) 436-6564 prior to HUD's release of grant
funds.
U.S. Department of Housing and City of Rancho Cucamonga
Urban Development
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Grant Officer
Title Title
Date Date
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Nettle Nielsen, Recreation Superviso~----__~)
,SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF STREET BANNER APPLICATIONS AND SCHEDULE
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
attached street banner and schedule for calendar year 2003.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Annually, the Community Services Department requests applications for banner
displays on Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. According to City policy, only City
sponsored events and activities are eligible to display banners.
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the street banner applications and
schedule for calendar year 2003 at their October 17, 2002, meeting and recommended
approval.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact.
itted,
Community Services Director
I:\COMMSERV~Council&Boards\CityCouncil\StaffReports~002~anners 11.20.02.doc
SCHEDULE Of BANNER DISPLAYS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2003
Orqanization Event Event Date Display Dates Location
City Registration Mamh 17, 2003 Mamh 10 - Mamh 24 Both
RC Library Library Trivia Challenge Mamh 2003 (TBA) TBA TBA
City Quakes Opening Day April 11, 2003 Mamh 24- Mamh 31 Baseline
April 7 - Apd114 Baseline
City Kids Fest April 19, 2003 Mamh 31 -April 7 Baseline
April 14 - April 21 Amhibald
RC Library Library Promotion April 6-12, 2003 Mamh 31 - April 14 Archibald
Search/Rescue 7th Annual/Run/Walk April 26, 2003 April 14- April 28 Baseline
City Rancho Nights May 1- Aug 28, 2003 April 21- April 28 Archibald
City Silver Anniversary May 10, 2003 Apdl 28- May 5 Archibald
May 5 - May 12 Baseline
Pub Works Public Works May 10, 2003 May 5 - May 12 Archibald
Open House
RDA Business Appreciation May 12-16, 2003 May 12- May 19 Both
City Rancho Nights May 1- Aug 28, 2003 May 19 - May 26 Baseline
Chamber Crusin' Cucamonga May 24-25, 2003 May 19 - May 26 Archibald
City Registration June 2, 2003 May 26- June 9 Both
City Quakes June 24, 2003 June 9 -June 30 Archibald
City Rancho Nights May 1- Aug 28, 2003 June 9 -June 16 Baseline
City July 4'~ Event July 4, 2003 June 16 - July 7 Baseline
June 31 - July 7 Archibald
City Rancho Nights May 1- Aug 28, 2003 July 7 - July 14 Archibald
RCPD National Night Out August 5, 2003 July 28 - August 11 Amhibald
City Rancho Nights May 1- Aug 28, 2003 August 4 -August 17 Baseline
City Registration August 25, 2003 August 18- August 25 Both
August 25 - September 18 Baseline
City Festival Event September 6, 2003 August 25 - September 8 Archibald
Inland Empire Open BUY.COM September 2003 (TBA) TBA TBA
Chamber of Grape Harvest October 3 - 5, 2003 September 22 - October 6 Both
Commerce Festival
OrRanization Event Event Date Display Dates Location
RC Fire Fire Prevention October 6-12, 2003 October 6 - 13 Both
City Founder's Gala November 1, 2003 October 13 - 20 Both
City Red Ribbon Week October 23-31,2003 October 20- 27 Both
City Founders Day November 8, 2003 October 27 - November 10 Both
City Tree Lighting November 20, 2003 November 10 - Dec 24 Baseline
RC Fire Spark of Love November 22 - Dec 23, 2003 Nov 17 - Dec 1 Archibald
Dec 1 -Dec 15 Baseline
City Registration Dec 22, 2003 Dec 15 - Dec 29 Both
T H E C I T Y 0 F
l~AN CH 0 CUCAHO N CA
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: James I. Harris, Associale Engineer and Project Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION
DEVICES FROM A SOLE SOURCE AS REQUIRED BY CALTRANS FOR
INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 210 RELATED TRAFFIC SIGNALS
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $40,000 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1124-
308-5650-1160124-0
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the purchase of emergency vehicle preemption devices from 3M Company;
authorize their sole source pumhase for installation at State Route 210 freeway related
traffic signals in an amount not to exceed $40,000 from account no. 1124-308-5650-
1160124-0 and approve future sole source purchases from 3M Company under similar
projects and conditions.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The City Council approved the use of emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) equipment
some time ago on the City's traffic signals and fire response vehicles. Since that time
EVP equipment has been included with all new and modified traffic signals. Just
recently, EVP emitters were added to police department vehicles.
In accordance with the EVP policy, when Route 210/30 traffic signal plans came
through for City staff review and approval, the designers were asked to include EVP
equipment on the plans. It was determined to be against local Caltrans policy and
outside the SanBAG budget to provide EVP for the freeway related traffic signals;
however, they agreed to install the devices with the other signal work if the City would
provide them. Funds were included in the City budget to provide EVP devices for
freeway related traffic signals. Over the course of the freeway construction several sets
were provided; however, with the imminent opening of the freeway, EVP devices were
CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Emergency Vehicle Preemption
November 20, 2002
Page 2
needed immediately at eight locations, those being the east and westbound freeway
ramp signals at Milliken Avenue, Haven Avenue, Archibald Avenue and Carnelian
Street.
Two brands of EVP equipment have been approved and specified for use on City traffic
signals, those being the Opticom brand from 3M Company and the Strobecom II brand
from Tomar Electronics. Local Caltrans personnel will only approve the use of Opticom
equipment from 3M Company, thereby creating a sole source criterion. As such
pumhases are expected in the future, approval for sole source acquisition would be
advantageous for similar projects and conditions.
Where possible, obtaining competitive bids from both suppliers and any others that may
be approved in the future will follow normal purchase procedures. Appropriate
purchases will be made as determined from those results.
R~_~ctfully submitted,
W' li¢.~n J. O'Nei~
City Engineer
WJO/JTH/jth
R A N C h O C U C a M O N G A
l~NCINE EDIN C D1VI&ION
S Repor
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF WORK PROGRAM AREAS TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD, NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation
of certain territories to the Work Program for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Rancho Etiwanda Revised University Project was approved by City Council on
September 6, 2000, for the division of 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a
Development Agreement dated November 29, 2000, for the entire development.
On November 7, 2001, Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 was formed. The
Developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, deposited $179,724 for the initial maintenance of
Landscape Maintenance District 10. On January 16, 2002, the Developer bonded for
installation of all backbone infrastructure, including streets, storm drains and landscaping.
Public improvement plans for Landscape Maintenance District 10 (Drawing 1803-L) were
approved on September 12, 2002. It is now possible to describe the Work Program. In
addition, all 12 tracts included in the formation of Landscape Maintenance District 10 have
recorded final maps. Applicable street trees are listed in Exhibit B of the attached
resolution.
Re~ully submitted,,
WiltMm J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sc
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Resolution
BOUNDAR"~ OF ANNEXATION
NORTH ~ NTS
CITY OF I~: Tract ~
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Ranchd Etiwanda
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinitg Map
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE WORK
PROGRAM FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
I0, FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA REVISED UNIVERSITY
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Pm 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts");
and
WHEREAS, the improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements") have
now been approved; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Work Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Work Program.
SECTION 3: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Scb~l ~ite ~
//~ ..... ~.~ J
~~~~ NORTH ~~
~ ~ ~S
CITY OF ~M: Tract CM~ IO
~NCHO CUC~ONGA TITLE: R~cho Etiw~
ENGmEE~G D~ISION ~ - [ E~IBIT: . VicMiW Map
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (LMD gl0) represents landscape sites throughout the
Rancho Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any
benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that
district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within
that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees and a
neighborhood park.
EXHIBIT "B"
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: Rancho Etiwanda
Tract Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
DGSF SF SF EA
14493-1 77
14494-1 74
14495 92
14496-1 86
14496 100
14497 79
14498 45
14522 50
14523-1 25
14523 100
15838 40
15902 36
Subtotal: 804
Da), Creek Blvd* 0 0 110,002 426
Wilson Avenue 12,550 0 47,446 172
Banyan Street 38,287 0 23,131 149
Vintage Avenue 0 ! 0 18,451 47
Bluegrass Avenue ! 0 0 26,920 77
LMD 10 Total: 50,837 0 225,950 2479
Total Trees: 1675
Rancho Etiwanda Park - 10 acres
* Tree quantity includes 112 Washington robusta Palms
Assessment Units by District
Tract DU SLD 1' SLD 7* CC date* LMD 10
14493-1 69 69 69 7/3/02 69
14494-1 63 63 63 3/20/02 63
14495 5~ 58 58 10/2/02 58
14496-1 51 51 51 10/2/02 51
14496 102 102 102 10/2/02 102
14497 73 73 73 3/20/02 73
14498 50 50 50 3/20/02 50
14522 40 40~ 40 7/3/02 40
14523-1 25 25 25 3/20/02 25
14523 48 48 48 3/20/02 48
15838 49 49 49 3/20/02 49
15902 25 25 25 3/20/02 25
Total: 653 653 653 663
* Each tract joined Street Lighting Districts at time of final map approval
B-2
71
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $597.09 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 653 1.00 653 $597.09 $389,899.77
TOTAL $389,899.77
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is:
653 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $597.09 Rate Per A.U. = $389,899.77 Annual Assessment
TH E CiTY OF
~ANCHO CUCAMONGA
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Duane Morita, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - AN
APPLICATION TO DESIGNATE THE MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE AS A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -APN:
208-331-07. RELATED FILES: LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT LA2002-
00003, MILLS ACT AGREEMENT MA2002-00001, AND MINOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00806.
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT MA2002-00001 - SOHEILA AZIZI - A REQUEST TO
IMPLEMENT THE USE OF THE MILLS ACT TO REDUCE PROPERTY TAX ON
THE MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE, A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED
AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 208-331-07. RELATED FILES:
LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003, LANDMARK ALTERATION
PERMIT LA2002-00003, AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-
00806.
RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission Recommends approval of
Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 by adoption of the attached resolution and by minute
action authorizing the Mayor to sign the Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Landmark Desiqnation: The requested landmark designation is for the Mitchell residence. The
subject structure qualifies for landmark designation based upon the criteria from the City's
Historic Preservation Ordinance, including the following significant areas: historical,
architectural, and neighborhood and geographic setting. Details concerning these areas of
significance are described in the Facts for Findings section outlined in the Historic Preservation
Commission Staff Report dated November 13, 2002 (Exhibit "A")
Mills Act Aqreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act
Agreement. The concept of the Mills Act is to provide an incentive for the property owner to
protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance.
Through the reduction of property taxes, the property owner is encouraged to reinvest the
money saved from the reduced property tax and use it on improvements to the property. The
properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND MILLS ACT AGREEMENT - SOHEILA AZlZI
November 20, 2002
Page 2
determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. The exact
amount of annual property tax savings to the owner are dependent upon the County Assessor's
property valuation, which is based on income potential and the capitalization rate at the time of
assessment. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed
and is attached for reference as Exhibit "C" of the attached Historic Preservation Commission
Staff Report dated November 13, 2002. Approval of the Agreement is by minute action,
authorizing the Mayor to sign the Property Tax Reduction Contract.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DM\Is
Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated November
13, 2OO2
Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation LD2002-00003
THE CITY OF
I~AN C It 0 Cl]CAI~ONGA
DATE: November 13, 2002
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Duane Morita, Planning Consultant
SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - An application
to designate the Mitchell family residence as a Historic Landmark, located at
10213 Foothill Boulevard as a Historic Landmark - APN: 208-331-07. Related
files: Landmark Alteration Permit I_A2002-00003, Mills Act Agreement
MA2002-00001, and Minor Development Review DRC2002-00806.
LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT .LA2002-00003 - SOHEILA AZIZI - An
application to convert the historic Mitchell family residence from residential to
office use and to allow minor extedor changes, located at 10213 Foothill
Boulevard APN: 208-331-07. Related files: Landmark Designation
LD2002-00003, Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001, and Minor Development
Review DRC2002-00806.
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT MA2002-00001 - SOHEILA AZIZI - A request to
implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Mitchell family
residence, a Historic Landmark, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard -
APN: 208-331-07. ReLated flies: Landmark Designation LD2002-00003,
Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003, and Minor Deevelopment Review
DRC2002-00806.
BACKGROUND:
A. Proiect Description: A Landmark Designation and Landmark Alteration Permit are
necessary to protect the historic Mitchell family residence. The applicant is proposing to
convert the Mitchell residence from a residential use to an office building. Tenant
improvements are being considered. Minor changes to the building's exterior are also
being proposed, including construction of a new stairway and re-plastering of an existing
block wall.
B. Site Characteristics: The 1.25-acre subject property is designated Office by the City
General Plan and zoned CO (Commercial Office) by the City Development Code. The
Mitchell residence is one of four structures located on-site. Three existing units are
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 - AZIZI LAW CENTER
November 13, 2002
Page 2
located in two buildings immediately east of the Mitchell residence; a garage and
dilapidated residence structure are located further to the south. Surrounding uses include
an existing Kindercare to the west; a vacant parcel to the east; and single-family
residences to the south.
C. General: The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling
with Italianate influence. The roof is medium gable with red tile, exposed eaves and knee
braces in gable end. The exterior is stucco. Second-story windows are single,
rectangular pane with wood lintel and sill. Windows on the lower level have transoms with
leaded glass. The front door is wood with leaded glass panels. A front arcade with a roof
sundeck and castellation is present, continuing around the west side of the structure.
Multiple French windows open out onto the second-story deck.
D. Historical Siqnificance: The Mitchell residence is an example of a turn of the century
vineyard house. Built by E. DeLarsen in 1918, the property is unique in that the housing
for the vineyard workers was built close to the main Mitchell residence. In most vineyards,
worker housing was typically located some distance away from the owner's house, usually
back in the vineyards. DeLarsen owned the property from 1915 to 1927. It was then
transferred through several different owners until 1943 when it was bought by the current
owners, Ellsworth and Harriett Mitchell. The Mitchells have long been established within
the community. Eilsworth's father established Mitchell and Son Plumbing in 1938 in
Upland and the business continues under Ellsworth's children.
ANALYSIS:
A. Landmark Desi.qnation: The requested landmark designation is for the Mitchell residence.
The subject structure qualifies for landmark designation based upon the criteria from the
City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including the following significant areas: historical,
architectural, and neighborhood and geographic setting. Details concerning these areas
of significance are described in the Facts for Findings section of this staff report.
B. Proposed Alterations: The applicant is proposing to convert the Mitchell residence from a
residential use to an office building. Tenant improvements are being considered. Minor
changes to the building's exterior are also being proposed, including construction of a new
stairway and re-plastering of an existing block wall. All exterior modifications made to the
structure will be "in kind" replacements that should resemble the original building materials
and architectural features as much as possible. A separate Minor Development Review
application is being processed which will address site planning and parking issues and the
Conditions of Approval for the Minor Development Review will apply to the Landmark
Alteration Permit.
C. Mills Act Aqreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act
Agreement. The concept of the Mills Act is to provide an incentive for the property owner
to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical
significance. Through the reduction of property taxes, the property owner is encouraged
to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax and use it on improvements to
the property. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff
on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating
the property. The exact amount of annual property tax savings to the owner are
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 - AZIZI LAW CENTER
November 13, 2002
Page 3
dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income
potential and the Capitalization rate at the time of assessment. The Agreement Schedule
List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for referance.
D. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 3.e of Article
19, Section 15308 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS:
A. Historical Significance:
Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an histodc pedod, type,
style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The house identifies the histodc pedod of the early 1900s when grove and
vineyard production was at its peak in the community and the region. The
rasidenCa is an example of a vineyard house, which was common at the turn of
the century.
Findinq 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once
common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once prevalent,
but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
Finding'3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind.
Fact/s: The landmark-eligible property is approximately 84 years old and is an example
of Craftsman style of architecture with Italianate influence.
Findinq 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important
or a local personality.
Fact/s: The house was built by E. DeLarsen. The Mitchell family bought the residence
in 1943. The Mitchells have long been established within the community.
EIIsworth's father established Mitchell and Son Plumbing in 1938 in Upland and
the business continues under EIIsworth's children.
FindinR 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which was once
common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once prevalent,
but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
B. Histodc Architectural and Enqineerin,q SignifiCance:
Findinq 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed
landmark ara unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
77
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
LD2002-00003, I.A2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 -AZIZI LAW CENTER
November 13, 2002
Page 4
Fact/s: The construction materials and engineering methods recall the use of details
and craftsmanship that was once common, but now is rare. The Mitchell
residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling with
Italianate influence. The roof is medium gable with red tile, exposed eaves,
and knee braces in gable end. The siding is stucco. Second-story windows
are single, rectangular pane with wood lintel and sill. Windows on the lower
level have transoms with leaded glass. The front door is wood with leaded
glass panels. A front arcade with a roof sundeck and castellation is present,
continuing around the west side of the structure. Multiple French windows
open out onto the second-story deck.
Findinq 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its
details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The gable roof, exposed eaves, and gable braces add to the beauty of the
proposed landmark. They ara not common features that are typically found
today.
C. Neiqhborhood and Geoqraphic Settinq:
Findinq 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the histodc character of the
neighborhood.
Fact/s: . The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling
with Italianate influence. In general, the architectural style enhances the
historic character of the City.
D. Landmark Alteration:
The proposed landmark alteration meets the following cdtada established in Chapter
22,24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code:
Findinq 1: The action proposed is consistent with the purpose of this Ordinance,
.Fac'ds: The landmark alteration, as presented, will enhance and promote continued
use of the Mitchell residence.
Findinq 2: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of
significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of a
historic nature.
Fact/s: The proposed restoration and rehabilitation is architecturally compatible and
will enhance the continued use of the Mitchell residence. The rehabilitation will
follow the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Rehabilitation,
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT
LD2002-00003, LA2002-00003, MA 2002-00001 - AZlZI LAW CENTER
November 13, 2002
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Histodc Preservation Commission adopt the
attached resolutions recommending City Council approval of Landmark Designation
LD2002-00003 and Resolution of Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003 and
recommend, by minute action, to the City Council for the Mills Act Agreement MA2002-00001.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DM/mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A"- Site Location Map
Exhibit "B"- Photos
Exhibit "C"- Agreement Schedule, List of Improvements
Draft Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation LD2002-00003
Draft Resolution of Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit LA2002-00003
FOOTHILL BLVD.
/
SUBJECT SITE
EXHIBIT a
Mitchell - De Larsen Complex'
BUILDING PHOTO SURVEY
BUILDING A (MAIN RESIDENCE)
10211 FOOTHtL BLVD
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9/12/2002
Page 1 of 4
Exhibit "B"
Mitchell - De Larsen Complex
BUILDING PHOTO SURVEY
BUILDING B (GARAGE)
10211 FOOTHILL BLVD.
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9/12/2002
Page 2 of 4
Mitchell - De Larsen Complex
BUILDING PHOTO SURVEY
BUILDING C (WORKER COTTAGES)
10211 FOOTHILL BLVD.
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9/12/2002
Page 3 of 4
Mitchell - De Larsen Complexw
BUILDING PHOTO SURVEY
BUILDING D (DILAPIDATED COTTAGE - UNSAFE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION REQUESTED)
10211 FOOTHILL BI. VD
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9/12/2002
Page 4 of 4
City' of Rancho Cucamonga
Historic Preservation Commission
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL:
(To be completed by the Applicant)
Please list the improvements which are intended to take place over the next 10 years. List
them in order of owner's priority.
YEARI IMPROVEMENT I
2002 Make Tenant improvements for office use
2003 Install irrigation system
2004 Remove trellis install new trellis
2005 Remove existing garage/ Construction new qaraqe
2006 Paint existino residential ~tructures
2007 Remove walnut tree/ Install new landscaping
2008 Construct new 4000 square feeto/Commercial buildinq
2009 Remove the dilapidated cottaae {Buildino D)
2010 Construct new 4000 square foot Commercial Building
2011 Install new Windows in existing building
I certify that I am presently the legal owner of the subject property. Further, I acknowledge
the supplemental information on this form will be used as an exhibit attached to the Mills
Act Agreement.
Date: Signature:
Exhibit "C"
3
RESOLUTION NO. ~,-/~-."/-.1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUOAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK DESIGNATION
LD2002-00003 - DESIGNATING THE MITCHELL FAMILY RESIDENCE A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 10213 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 208-331-07.
A. Recitals.
1. Soheila Azizi filed an application for Landmark Designation LD2002-00003 as described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as
"the application."
2. On November 13, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval.
3. On November 20, 2002, the City Council held their meeting and approved Landmark
Designation LD2002-00003.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A,"
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The application applies to approximately 1.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located at 10213 Foothill Boulevard.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts:
a. Historical and Cultural Significance:
Findinq 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historic period,
type, style, region, or way of life.
Fact/s: The property identifies the historic period of the early 1900s when grove
and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and the region. -,
The residence is an example of a vineyard house, which was common at
the turn of the century.
Findinq 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was
once common, but is now rare.
Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. \
Findinq
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003
November 20, 2002
Page 2
FacEs: The landmark-eligible property is approximately 84 years old and is an
example of Craftsman style of architecture with Italianate influence.
Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or
important or a local personality.
FacEs: The house was built by E. DeLarsen. The Mitchell family bought the
residence in 1943. The Mitchells have long been established within the
community. EIIsworth's father established Mitchell and Son Plumbing in
1938 in Upland and the business continues under EIIsworth's children.
Finding 5: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use, which was
once common, but is now rare.
FacEs: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once
prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and vineyard houses.
b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance:
Findinq 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed
landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective.
FacEs: The construction materials and engineering methods recall the use of
details and craftsmanship that were once common, but now is rare. The
Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman styling
with Italianate influence. The roof is medium gable with red tile, exposed
eaves, and knee braces in gable end. The siding is stucco. Second-
story windows are single, rectangular pane with wood lintel and sill.
Windows on the lower level have transoms with leaded glass. The front
door is wood with leaded glass panels. A front arcade with a roof
sundeck and castellation is present, continuing around the west side of
the structure. Multiple French windows open out onto the second-story
deck.
Findinq 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or
its details and materials are beautiful or unusual.
Fact/s: The gable roof, exposed eaves, and gable braces add to the beauty of
the proposed landmark. They are not common features that are typically
found today.
c. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting:
Findinq 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the
neighborhood.
Fact/s: The Mitchell residence is a two-story rectangular structure of craftsman
styling with Italianate influence. In general, the architectural style
enhances the historic character of the City.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
LANDMARK DESIGNATION LD2002-00003
November 20, 2002
Page 3
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt under CEQA,
pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption (historical resource
restoration/rehabilitation).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Landmark
Designation LD2002-00003.
6. The Mayor shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
THE CITY OF
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AWARD WITH BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORATION (CO 02-087) FOR PREPARATION OF
CONSTRUCTION PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION COST
ESTIMATES FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, PHASE 2,
FROM AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM
ACCOUNT NO. 11103165300 FOR THE AMOUNT OF $40,658 WITH A
PORTION TO BE REIMBURSED FROM A GRANT UNDER THE BICYCLE
TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT (BTA).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the additional award of $40,658 with Boyle
Engineering Corporation and authorize the City Engineer to accept the change.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 7, 2002, the City Council approved an agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare the plans, specifications, and engineering necessary
to construct the first phase of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. Recently, Caltrans
announced that the City of Rancho Cucamonga's $252,000 BTA grant application had been
approved; therefore, it is necessary to expand Boyle's contract scope to provide additional
services for Phase 2 of this trail project. The expanded scope will include preliminary and final
engineering designs, and project management services. The additional amount is to be funded
from Account No. 11103165300.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:DC~Is
Attachment: Proposal
PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL
DESIGN PROPOSAL
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Amethyst to Archibald
INTRODUCTION
The following scope of services is proposed for the preparation of plans,
specifications, and construction cost estimates for the construction of a bike and
equestrian trail within the Pacific Electric right-of-way within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
The project will consist of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian trail improvements
from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue, and an overall distance of
approximately 0.28 miles
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1 - PROJECT INITIATION
a) Kickoff Meeting - The Project Manager for the Boyle Team will meet with
the City Project Manager to discuss the project scope and schedule,
guidelines, issues to be addressed (technical, environmental and
community), type of project approval and required environmental
documentation.
b) Aerial Mapping and Field Survey -The aerial topographic map, at a
scale of 1"= 20' with 2' contours will be utilized for the project site. The
map will show the Pacific Electric right-of-way, and adjacent roads,
buildings, fences, power poles, trees, brush, surface drainage facilities
and other features. A field verification survey will be conducted to pick up
and verify topographic data such as manhole covers, valve boxes and
other features within the right-of-way. Cross sections will be taken every
500' along the corridor centerline and along the northerly and southerly
right-of-way boundaries at street crossings within the project limits. The
following street crossings will be sectioned:
i) Amethyst
ii) Archibald
Deliverables will include ground control values, cross section information,
aerial contact prints, aero-triangulation results, paper check plots, and
AutoCAD v2000 digital files as required for a typical Caltrans project.
c) Data Collection - Boyle will collect as-built data, utility atlases from the
City, County, and Caltrans. It is assumed that Boyle shall rely on the
accuracy of data provided by others without independent verification.
d) Initial Utility Notification - This task will include the sending of notices to
utility agencies in the area, advising them of the project and soliciting
pertinent information, including as-built drawings.
TASK 2 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN (15% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT)
a) Brainstorming Workshop - A separate brainstorming meeting will not be
held. Discussions will occur in the Kickoff Meeting.
b) Conceptual Geometric Plans - Conceptual geometric drawings will be
prepared in AutoCAD version 2000 at a scale of 1"= 20' depicting the
preferred alternative as outlined in the Master Plan to the extent
practicable. The conceptual geometrics will be shown in plan view on the
digital topographic mapping, showing centerlines and edges of trailway.
Centerline data such as curve radius will also be shown. Centerline
profiles will not be prepared for the initial concepts; however, critical
clearance requirements will be identified.
c) Conceptual Landscaping Plan - A conceptual landscape plan will be
developed by Lynn Capouya, Inc. (LCl) that is responsive to local
conditions, including drought tolerant plant material and water
conservation issues. LCI will define the locations for new and or infill
landscape, identify conflicts, finalize plant palette, meet with
park/recreation staff and associated landscape maintenance districts,
ascertain points of connection, and further define the character of key
areas.
d) Typical Sections - Proposed typical cross sections for the various trail
sections shall be prepared. The typical sections will depict the equestrian
and bike trail location, trail width and section, right-of-way limits, and
fencing.
e) Sign Layout Concept - A preliminary determination of the number and
interval and location of regulatory and trailblazing signs, and other
corridor-specific signs, e.g. mile markers, as well as points of interest and
connectivity. Proposed sign locations will be shown on the double-panel
geometric plans.
f) Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - A preliminary estimate will be
prepared for each alternative. The estimate will contain a 20 percent
contingency, and will be refined during final design. The estimate will
include preliminary costs for construction, environmental mitigation, utility
relocation/adjustment and right-of-way.
g) Agency Review and Coordination Meetings - The Geometric Concept
Drawings and Sign Layout Concept, and Conceptual Landscape Plans will
be submitted to the City for review. A coordination meeting will be held
between Boyle, LCI, and the City to review the comments and refine the
landscaping and signing schemes. It is assumed that two (2) meetings
will be required: the first meeting will encompass review of the City's
comments and discussion of plan refinement. A subsequent submittal of
the above-defined documents will be made, followed by second meeting
to review and approve the revised concept plans.
TASK 3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
c) Geotechnical Studies Kleinfelder will provide geotechnical information to
determine structural foundation constraints and requirements for trail
pavement thickness along the entire alignment. This information will
include:
· Generalsubsurface conditions
· Existing structure and foundation data
· Maximum credible rock acceleration (from CDMG OFR-92-1)
· Magnitude of the maximum credible event
· Name of the causative fault and distance from the site
· Depth to rock or rock-like material
· Liquefaction potential
· Types of foundations for new structures, e.g. retaining walls
· Recommendations on pavement design, slope stability, and
retaining wall foundations
The geotechnical information will be based on geologic literature such
as geologic maps, topographic maps, and geotechnical reports. Field
borings and laboratory analysis will be completed as listed below.
A subsurface field investigation will be performed, laboratory testing
conducted, and a Geotechnical Report prepared for design of the bike
and equestrian trail.
Prior to the initiation of our field investigation, Underground Service
Alert (USA) will be notified to identify any underground utilities present
along the proposed alignment.
The field investigation program will be prepared in consultation with
Boyle and is expected to include a total of one exploratory boring to 10
feet is proposed along the trail alignment at approximately 1,000 to
1,500-foot intervals. A truck-mounted drill rig, using an 8-inch diameter
hollow stem auger will be used for the borings. Relatively undisturbed
samples of the subsurface soils will be obtained at approximately 5-
foot intervals in the borings. Bulk samples of representative soil types
will also be obtained. Standard Penetration Tests will be performed in
accordance with ASTM D1586. An engineer or geologist from
Kleinfelder will maintain a log of the soils encountered and obtain
samples for visual examination, classificatio.n and laboratory testing.
In addition to the field exploration, geologic mapping of the entire
alignment will be performed by an Engineering Geologist. The
geologic units will be identified on the topographic map provided by
Boyle. The geologic mapping will aid in identifying any suspect
soil/artificial fill layers along the alignment.
Laboratory tests will be performed to assess the engineering properties
of the soils and for preparing construction recommendations. The
following laboratory tests are planned:
Moisture/Unit Weight General Soil Properties
Maximum Unit Weight/Optimum Compaction Characteristics
Moisture
Direct Shear Undisturbed Fou'ndations
Consolidation (Undisturbed) Removal Depths, Foundations
Sieve Analysis ClassifiCation
Chemical Test Cement Type and Steel Protection
R-Value Pavement Design
Analysis and Report Preparation
Results of our field explorations, laboratory testing, and engineering
analyses will be summarized in a report containing at least the following:
· A description of the proposed project including a site plan showing
the approximate boring locations;
· A description of the surface and subsurface site conditions
encountered during our field investigation;
· A description of the site geologic setting and possible associated
geology-related hazards, including preliminary assessment of
liquefaction potential. Furthermore, a site seismic acceleration
would be developed using deterministic methods;
· Groundwater conditions within the depths of the investigation;
· Presence and effect of expansive and/or compressible soils;
· Anticipated total and differential settlements;
· Recommendations related to the geotechnical aspects of:
· Site preparation and engineered fill;
· Temporary excavations, shoring and trench backfill;
· Permanent cut and fill slope construction, including erosion
protection;
· Earth retaining walls; static and dynamic lateral earth pressures;
· Recommendations for pavement design;
· A discussion of the corrosion potential of the near-surface soils
encountered during our field exploration. If corrosive soils are
encountered, we recommend that samples be sent to a qualified
corrosion engineer for testing and recommendations. We have not
included this cost in our proposal, but will contact you if this service
is warranted.
· An appendix that will include a summary of the field investigation,
Log of Test Borings and laboratory testing programs.
TASK 4 - FINAL DESIGN
Plans, Specifications and Estimates will be prepared in accordance with the
latest edition (at the time of project commencement) of the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction ("Green Book"), Caltrans Standard
Plans and Specifications, and City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Details. The
following elements will be contained in the PS&E:
a) Title Sheet - An additional title sheet is not necessary since the Amethyst
Street to Archibald Avenue section will be included with the Phase I plans.
b) Typical Sections and Construction Notes - Typical cross sections for
the various trail sections will be prepared. The typical sections will depict
the trail location, trail width and structural section, right-of-way limits, and
fencing. A list of project construction notes will be included on this sheet.
c) Plan and Profile Sheets - Drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD version
2000 at a scale of 1"=20' depicting the requirements for trail construction.
The plan view shall also include striping and signing elements,
landscaping and irrigation modifications, and utility locations and
dispositions (e.g. to be removed, relocated, or protected in place.) We
anticipate that one sheet will be required.
d) Signal Plans for Type 3 Grade Crossings - Drawings will include signal
layout drawings and one (1) signal detail sheet for the Type 3 crossings at
Archibald Avenue.
e) Signal Plans for Type 1 Grade Crossings - Drawings will include 1
signal layout sheet for flashing beacon installations, and one (1) signal
detail sheet for the Type I crossings at Amethyst Street.
f) Landscaping and Irrigation Plans - Drawings will include irrigation
sheets, incorporating current xeriscape standards and required
calculations; planting plans, utilizing drought tolerant, locally available
materials; and landscaping details.
g) Trailhead Site Plans and Details - There are no trailheads in the
segment from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue.
h) Construction Details - Details will be required to address, in detail,
construction of ramps, gates, fencing, and modifications to drainage
facilities, and sign legends and details.
i) Specifications - The construction specifications, specifically, the
technical specifications, will be prepared in MS Word in accordance with
City, APWA ("Green Book"), and Caltrans standard specifications.
j) Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - This will be prepared and
submitted with the 95 percent and Final Plans.
k) Submittals - The following submittals, in addition to those described
elsewhere in this scope of work, will be made during the course of the
project:
i) 50 Percent Complete Stage - This submittal will include transmittal of
plans along with a Second Notice to the utility agencies identified
during project initiation.
ii) 95 Percent Complete Stage - This submittal will include transmittal of
plans along with a Final Notice (Require to Relocate/Adjust Facilities)
to the appropriate utility agencies.
iii) Final PS&E
TASK 5 - GRANT MANAGEMENT
Boyle will coordinate the management of all aspects of the STE grant with
assistance provided by Alta with the Federal grant received by the City. The
management of the documents will incorporate the required back-up
documentation and other materials as appropriate and needed over the
course of the project including:
· Completing field review forms
· Executing agreements
· Compliance review
· Submission of payment and reimbursement requests.
· Review expenditures for eligibility per accounting
requirements
· Preparing project completion packets
· Preparing time extensions if needed
TASK 6 - FUNDING ASSISTANCE
No assistance for seeking additional grants will be included in this contract.
TASK 7 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Boyle will remain available, at no additional cost to the City, to answer technical
questions related to the design documents and respond to Requests For
Information during bidding and construction of the project. In addition, the
following construction phase services will be provided in accordance with the fee
estimate provided under separate cover:
a) Attend Pre Construction Meeting - The Boyle Project Manager will
attend the Pre-construction meeting.
b) Provide Shop Drawing Reviews
c) Prepare Record Drawings
TASK 8 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The following project management services are required to successfully
complete the project:
a) General Project Management - This task includes the time required for
Boyle's Project Manager, with administrative assistance, to administer the
project contract, coordinate Boyle personnel and subconsultant activities,
prepare and maintain the project schedule, and prepare invoicing.
b) QA/QC - Each of our submittals will be reviewed by personnel not directly
involved with project to ensure that Boyle and City quality standards are
met.
c) Meetings and Permit Assistance - The Boyle Project Manager will
assist the City in its preparation of permit applications to Caltrans and
other agencies as necessary. In addition, Boyle staff will attend various
meetings, in addition to those described elsewhere in this scope of work,
as requested by the City up to an additional 12 hours beyond the Phase I
hours.
d) Project Schedule - Boyle will prepare and maintain a resoume-loaded
CPM project schedule throughout the life of the project. The schedule will
be updated bi-weekly and provided to the City on a monthly basis as a
part of the Phase I project.
Project Budget
pacific Electric Inland l~Impire Trail lmpr overaents City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga - Amethyst to Archibald
R A N C H O C ~J C A M O N G A
~ N (] I N ~ Z 1~ I N C D Z P A D T M ~' N T
Staff
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste/NPDES Coordinator
Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES) - PHASE II PERMIT FEE AND APPROPRIATION OF
$12,500 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1001-306-5300
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of $12,500, for
the phase II, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit fee
into Account No 1001-306-5300.
BACKGROUND/~ALYSlS'
The State Water Quality Control Board (SWQCB) existing permit fee structure has
been revised by the enactment of AB 3000, in conjunction Phase II of the Clean
Water Act. The new fee structure imposes a fee based upon the population of the
service area. This resulted in a permit fee of $12,500.00 for the City that is due
November 29, 2002.
In addition to the SWQCB permit fee, The City is Co-Permitted within the San
Bernardino County area wide NPDES permit and pays a fee to the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District. Under the new fee structure the County forecasts next
years area wide permit will increase at least 60% to meet the Phase II regulations.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
REPORT ON NPDES PERMIT FEE
NOVEMBER 20, 2002
PAGE 2
In conjunction with the increase in Storm Water permit fees, the construction and
general permits have been increased from $250.00 to $700.00 annually. This
will affect over 100 construction sites and businesses in Rancho Cucamonga.
We are asking the City Council to allocate $12,500.00 for the permit fee. These
funds are necessary to keep the City of Rancho Cucamonga in compliance with
the NPDES Phase II permit.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
W JO:MT
I~ A N C H O C U CA M O N G A
ENGINEERING DIVISION
$ Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO:. Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
~: APPROVAL OF THE DEANNEXATION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP
15802 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7, LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, NORTH OF BANYAN STREET
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the deannexation of
certain territories from Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 7.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map 15802 was approved by City Council on July 17, 2002. The map recorded October
18, 2002, after which Parcel 1 was purchased by the Fire District for the purpose of constructing
the East Avenue Fire Station (DRC2002-00065).
Since City facilities do not pay taxes, parcel 1 needs to be removed from the street lighting and
landscape maintenance districts that Parcel Map 15802 was annexed into.
Respectfully submitted,
Will[.agfi J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sc
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Resolution
SUBTPM15802
DRC2002-00065
~ NORTH ~ 1''= 1000'
CITY OF / ~}./._
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: Parcel Map 15802
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity map
RESOLUTION NO. {~)~.° ~.~1~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
DEANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
7 FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 15802
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance
Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance
Districts; and
WHEREAS, the properties described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have previously been annexed to the Maintenance
District; and
WHEREAS, the Fire District's purchase of Parcel 1 has resulted in its removal from
the tax roles.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: This legislative body hereby orders the deannexation of Parcel 1 of
Parcel Map 15802 from the Maintenance District, resulting in a
Revised Work Program as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the
levy of all assessments, shall continue to be applicable to the balance
of the territory annexed on July 17, 2002.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
JOSEPH W. BONNEVILLE
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL NO. 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 3213, 1N THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 28, PAGE 77 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-1
.... / ., ~ :.' .- <,,. ,.. . ,..
' ~ ,'.v ./ ........... .,,,._.. 11~11~ ....
:"' : i' ~ ,--- ......... "-. ......... ~ ......... ~ ......... ' .
· ~E-~_--D~ ..
'~": '"" '"' ' ?11..
~. . ,.'"".~ I~,,,,:.i.l:~:: .... ~..
.... · ..~,.... ~,..~ ........ . ........ ' ~,~.,~ ., ..... ,- ' f.,.-~,~r .- --" .~ .
.',' .-- ' ..... -'
........ :' ~' '"" "'~ "~"I" , '" ' / .... ';' '"'-~' :
~ii:~ . .... ~ ...... ..,. .... ,: .......
"-" 107 '
,.-',.. ...~.. -- , . , .,'~ '~ ;.. .... . .... ..'
.... ;:'.':~ "~"-..'"P ...... , : r,_2~r~'-' t ..'q,
NORTH fl 1"= 100'
CITY OF I~M: ?arccl Map 15802
(~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: A~cx to LMD 7, SLD ] & SLD 7
ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: A-2
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD gl)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.7 (NORTH ETIWANDA):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area
of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and
north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the
facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7(NORTH ETIWANDA)
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda
North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived
from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district.
Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees,
community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park.
EXHIBIT "B" REVISED
Revised Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: Parcel Map 15802
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 ...............
SLD # 7 --- 2* - ........
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L 7 ......... 8*
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by
District
Pamel DU S 1 S 7 L 7
2-4 1 1 1 1
Annexation Date: July 17, 2002
Revision Date: November 20, 2002
B-2 PM 15802
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
REVISED
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ! (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per asscssmcnt unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for thc fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of 4/of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
T,and Use Unit Tyne Units T}'nit~ Factnr Ilnit~ TTnit Revenue
Single $351,899.31
Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77
Multi-
Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 17.77 131,533.54
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15802) is:
3 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $53.31 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
sununarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
1.2nd Use Hnlt Tyne TInit~ llnit~ Factor ltnit~ llnit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 1084 1.00 1084 $33.32 $36,118.88
Conm~Ind Acre 5 2.00 i0 $33.32 $333.00
TOTAL $36,452.08
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15802) is:
3 Parcels x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $99.96 Annual Assessment
C-1 PM 15802
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA)
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda):
# of Assessment # of Rate Per
Physical Units Assessment Assessment
I.and Use Tvn¢ lInit~ Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 1454 1.00 1454 $307.05 $446,450.70
Family
Corem/Ind. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $ 3,070.50
TOTAL $449,521.20
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15802) is:
3 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per A.U. = $921.15 Annual Assessment
C-2 PM 15802
RAN H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINE EI~ING DIvI&IOi,/
$ fRe r
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF EASEMENTS FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON FOR THE INSTALLATION OF BANYAN STREET
IMPROVEMENTS AND FOR STORM DRAINS WEST OF WILSON
AVENUE AND NORTH OF TRACT 14496, LOCATED WEST OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the
City Engineer to accept a road and a storm drain easement to be granted by Southern
California Edison. ,
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Rancho Etiwanda Revised University project was approved by City Council on
September 6, 2000, for the division of 250 acres into 685 lots. The City entered into a
Development Agreement dated November 27, 2000, for the entire development. On
September 4, 2002, the Council approved improvement agreements and bonds for
storm drain lines "C" and "E" and for Banyan Street between Day Creek Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue, both submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC.
Southern California Edison has issued temporary entry permits for Rancho Etiwanda
685 to construct the bonded improvements while the permanent easements are being
processed. The Edison easements are being granted subject to terms and conditions
as shown in the attachments. The attached resolution will authorize the City Engineer
to accept the stated terms and conditions.
Respectfully submi~ed,
City Engineer
Attachment: Vicinity Map
Road Easement
Storm Drain Easement
Resolution
~OUND~Y OF ANN[~TION
NORTH NTS
CITY OF ~eM: Storm Drains
~NCHO CUCAMONGA r~[~: R~cho Efiw~da
E~G~EER~G DIVISION E~IBIT: Vic~ity Map
-' - Itl
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
14799 CHESTNUT STREET
WESTIVIINSTEI~ C.~ 92683-5240
ATTN: CHRISTINA NUANEZ
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
[~oad Eas~t DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S ~ SER. 65499A J.O. 2155
COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERT~ CONVEYEr
Locat/on: ~Hncho OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE U/SS MENS AND A~
cu~noga ~. __...~c. uMpf~_ .c5s2~. ?~ .~N G AT ~ME OF SA'= ~.PO.^TE S~- E~^TE
RP FIle No.: GRT 990022 ~ ~ SO. CALiF. EDtSONCO, DEPARTMENT
SI~TURE OF DEC~ OR AGENT DETERMINING TAX RRM NAME
Affects SCE DOC. 206384 sv JG DATE 0~/25/02
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Grantor~',
does hereby grant to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. a municipal corporation, hereinafter
called "Grantee", an easement for road purposes, ih, on, under, over, along and across two strips of
land, each 40.00 feet wide, lying within that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga
County of San Bernardino. State of Califomia, described as follows:
Said strips of land are more particularly described on the Exhibit "A" and more particularly
shown on the Exhibit "B", both attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
SUBJECT TO covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, exceptions, encumbrances,
rights, easements, leases and licenses, affecting the above described real property or any portion
thereof, whether of record or not.
The foregoing grant is made subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. The said Easement is granted subject to the right of Grantor to construct, maintain, use, operate,
alter, add to, repair, replace, reconstruct, enlarge and/or remove in, on, over, under, through,
along and across the above described real property, electric transmission and distribution lines
and communication lines, together with supporting structures and appurtenances, for conveying
electric energy for light, heat, power and communication purposes, and pipelines and
appurtenances for the transportation of off, petroleum, gas, water, or other substances, and
conduits for any and all purposes.
2. Grantor shall not erect or place at any future time any of its facilities so as to unreasonably
interfere with the rights of Grantee created by this Easement grant.
3. The said Easement shall be exercised so as not to endanger or interfere with the construction,
maintenance, use, operation, presence, repair, replacement, relocation, reconstruction or removal
of such electric transmission, distribution or communication lines, pipelines, or other conduits.
4. By the acceptance hereof, the Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor, its officers, agents, and/or
employees, from any and all liability, loss, or damage to which Grantor, its officers, agents, and/or
employees may be subjected as the result of any act or omission by Grantee, its officers, agents or
Grant of Easement
$.C.E., a corporation to
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
Serial No. 65499A
RP FILE: GRT990022
Affects SCE Document(s):20631M
employees arising out of the exercise by Grantee, its officers, agents, or employees, of any of the
rights granted to it by this instrument.
5. Grantee agrees that in the exercise of its rights hereunder, its contractors, employees and other
agents will maintain a minimum clearance of twenty-seven (27.00) feet between their equipment
and any and all overhead electric conductors.
6. Grantor shall have full unobstructed access to its facilities at all times and the right to dear, keep
clear, and remove any and all obstructions of any kind at all times.
7. Grantor reserves for itself the right to trim any tree or trees which may grow in or on the above
described real property and which, in the opinion of Grantor, endanger or interfere with the proper
operation or maintenance of said electric transmission, distribution and communication lines, to
the extent necessary to prevent any such interference or danger.
8. The above described real property is to be used only for the purposes specified herein and in the
event:
a. said real property is not so used;
b. said real property shall be vacated as a road right of way; or
c. the project for which this Easement is being granted is abandoned,
d. the Easement shall thereupon, ipso facto, revert to and merge in the interest of Grantor in
the above described real property.
9. Upon termination' or reversion of the rights herein granted, Grantee shall execute and deliver to
Grantor, within thirty (30) days after service of a written demand therefor, a good and sufficient
quitclaim deed to the rights herein given. Should Grantee fail or refuse to deliver to Grantor a
quitclaim deed, as aforesaid, a written notice by Grantor reciting the failure or refusal of Grantee
to execute and deliver said quitclaim deed as herein provided and terminating this Easement
shall, after ten (10) days from the date of recordation of said notice, be conclusive evidence against
Grantee and all persons claiming under Grantee of the termination or reversion of the rights
herein given.
10. As a controlling part of the consideration for the execution and delivery of this instrument by
Grantor, the Easement is accepted upon and subject to the express condition that the
improvement for which the Easement is given, regardless of the time performed, and any other
work or improvement commenced within two years from the date of recording of this Easement
(which improvement and other work or improvement are hereinafter sometimes collectively called
"Improvement"] shall be done without any cost or expense whatsoever to Grantor, and that in the
event a special assessment or assessments is or are levied by an authorized lawful body against
the real property of Grantor for the Improvement, Grantee agrees that it will reimburse Grantor
and It shall be the binding obligation of the Grantee to reimburse Grantor for the full amount of
any and all such special assessment or assessments so levied for said Improvement and paid by
Grantor.
11.3
Grant of Easement
S.C.E, a corporation to
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
Serial No. 65499A
RP FILE: GRT990022
Afl'ect~ SCE Document(s):206384
11. Also as a controlling part of the consideration for the execution and delivery of this instrument by
Grantor, Grantee covenants, for itself, its successors and assigns, to construct and maintain the
improvement to be located on the above described real property at its own expense.
12. Grantee hereby recognizes Grantor's title and interest in and to the above described real property
and agrees never to assail or resist Grantor's title or interest therein.
13. A~y earth fill placed by Grantee within the boundaries of the above described real property shall
have a relative compaction density of ninety percent {90%].
14. The rights hereby granted are not necessary or useful in the performance of the duties of said
Grantor to the public.
15. Grantee agrees that all construction equipment, when not in use, shall be parked clear of
Edison's right of way and/or rendered immobile
16. Grantee agrees to provide twenty-four (24.00)-foot commercial type driveways with curb
depressions capable of supporting forty (40) tons on a three-axle truck at such locations specified
by the Grantor.
17. Grantee agrees to maintain the above described real property in a condition satisfactory to
Grantor.
18. Any notice provided herein to be given by either party hereto to the other may be served by
depositing in the United States Post Office, postage prepaid, a sealed envelope containin4~ a copy of
such notice and addressed to said other party at its principal place of business.
19. Grantee shall place identification and location markers of a number, location and nature suitable
to Grantor, indicating the type, location and depth of any facilities, structures or equipment
located by Grantee in the underground of the above described real property.
20. Any underground facilities shall be buried in the ground so that the tops thereof shall be not less
than three (3.00) feet below the surface of the ground, shall be capable of supporting three-axle
versicles weighing up to forty (40] tons, and shall be of such type of construction and material as to
be sufficient and safe for the purpose for which they are to be used.
21. Gr,~tee shall promptly and properly replace the earth over any underground facilities, shah tamp
or water-settle such earth so that no depressions shall be left or shah develop in the surface of the
ground over said underground facilities, and shall restore the surface of the ground over said
underground facilities to as near its original condition and appearance as possible.
22. Upon the termination or reversion of the rights herein granted, Grantee shah at its own risk and
expense remove said road and restore said above described real property as nearly as possible to
the same state and condition that it was in prior to any construction of said facilities, but ff it
should fail to do so within sixty (60) days after such termination, Grantor may do so at the risk of
Grantee, and all cost and expense of such removal and the restoration of said premises as
aforesaid, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum shall be paid
by Grantee upon demand.
3
Grant of Easement
S.C.E., a corporation to
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
Serial No. 65499A
RP FILE: GRT990022
Affects SCE Doculnent(s):206384
23. G:rantee agrees to install sixteen-foot-wide double-drive gates at locations specified by Grantor.
24. Grantee agrees that all fencing and metallic structures installed within the above described real
property shall be adequately grounded.
25. Grantee agrees that no additional structures will be installed on the above described real property.
26. Grantee agrees that the construction of the road must be adequately sloped, so as to provide
Grantor through access across the above described real property.
27. Grantee agrees not to store flammable materials nor store or park any vehicle on the above
described real property.
28. Any trees or plants within the above described real property shall be maintained by Grantee and
shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet.
29. Grantee agrees that during any period of construction activity, it will periodically water down the
construction area within the above described real property, so as to prevent dust contamination of
Graninr's -facilities.
30. The use of the neuter gender herein will. when appropriate, be construed to mean either the
masculine or feminine gender or both. Unless expressly provided elsewhere, herein to the
contrary, the terms, covenants and conditions of this Easement shall inure to the benefit of and
are. binding upon the heirs, successors, representatives and assigns of the parties hereto.
IN ~ WHEREOF,.~d Southern California Edison Company has caused this
instrument to be executed this ~r day of t~J'c~F-tl,~ ,20 d 2..
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
a corporation
Genie L. Sanders
Right of Way Agent
Real Estate Operations Division
Corporate Real Estate Department
Ilu
Grant of Easement
$.C.E., a corporation to
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation
Serial No. 65499A
RP FILE: GRT990022
Affects SCE Document(s):206384
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA does hereby accept the above and foregoing Easement upon
and subject to all of the terms, covenants and conditions therein contained, and does hereby agree to
comply with and perform each and all of said terms, covenants and conditions.
DATED as of this day of ,20 .
crrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation
Its:.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
personally
appeared
~ to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that (she/~ executed the same in (he~/~ authorized capacity and that by
(her/~ signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person
acted, executed the Instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF )
On , before me, , personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that (she/he) executed the same in (her/his) authorized capacity and that by
(her/his) signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person
acted, executed the instrument.
WfI'NESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
EXHIBIT "A'
SERIAL 65499A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(BANYAN STREET CROSSING)
THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6
WEST, S.B.B.M., COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 1
THE SOUTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 240.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29.
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.22 ACRES.
PARCEL 2
THE NORTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 240.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29.
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.22 ACRES.
SEE EXHIBIT "B", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING
MARK WARE, PLS 5820
EXP. 06/30/04
EXHA_UNIV_I1
//7
EXHIBIT "B"
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SERIAL 65499A
SCALE: "= 100'
:.--04
L,--d
o ~ ~ 240.00'
LDO')
z.,- SVV 11/4, S,W 1/4,
S_C. 29
-~'~ NVV /4,
W 1/4 COR., ~ PARCEL 1
/:0.22 ACRES
SEC. 29 ~
BANYAN STREET
~ PARCEL 2
~ /:0.22 ACRES
bJ
~-~ NW /4, N\J\J I /4,
"-d S\]V /4, SEC. 29
OLd
bjU3
z - 240.00'
ETIWANDA - PADUA 220KV T/L R/W
r'// MAP SHOWING ROADWAY EASEMENT
~ FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY TO CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
~. ~ LAND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
I I
COMPANY PER 5855/552 O.R.
AREA
APPROX. 0.44 ACRES
' RECORDING REQUESTED BY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
14799 C~ STREET
WESTMINSTER. CA. 92683-5240
/~I'fN: CHRISTINA NUANEZ
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Stor~ Dzaln Easement DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ ~ SER. 65500A J.O. 215~
Loc~t[o[l: ~qncho COMPUTED ON FULl. VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED
Cucamonga OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS UENS AND Approved
RP File No.: GRT990022 ,~j ~ENC,UM~N_ CE;~.REMAIN IN G AT TIME OF S~LE CORPORATE RF, AL ESTA~
~,9~.~.,~,.~ SO. CAUF. EDISON CO. DEPARTMENT
~'ect~J see DOC. 206384 S~NATURE OF DEC~"-PAINIT OR AGENT DETERMINING TAX FIRM NAME
& 319127 BYJG DATE 03~1/02
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Grantor",
does hereby grant to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- a municipal corporation, hereinafter
called "Grantee", an easement for storm drain purposes, in, on, under, over, along and across two
strips of land lying within that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, described as follows:
Said legal descriptions are more particularly described on the Exhibit A and Exhibit A- 1 and
more particularly shown on the Exhibit B and Exhibit B-l, both attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof.
SUI~ECT TO covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservaUons, exceptions, encumbrances,
rights, easements, leases and licenses, affecUng the above described real property or any portion
thereof, whether of record or not.
The foregoing grant is made subject to the following terms and condiUons:
1. The said Easement is granted subject to the right of Grantor to construct, maintain, use, operate,
alter, add to, repair, replace, reconstruct, enlarge and/or remove in, on, over, under, through,
along and across the above described real property, electric transmission and distribution lines
and communication lines, together with supporting structures and appurtenances, for conveying
electric energy for light, heat, power and communication purposes, and pipelines and
appurtenances for the transportation of oil, petroleum, gas, water, or other substances, and
conduits for any and all purposes.
2. Grantor shall not erect or place at any future time any of its facfliUes so as to unreasonably
interfere with the rights of Grantee created by this Easement grant.
3. The said Easement shall be exercised so as not to endanger or interfere with the construction.
maintenance, use. operation, presence, repair, replacement, relocation, reconstruction or removal
of such electric transmission, distribution or communication lines, pipelines, or other conduits.
4. By the acceptance hereof, the Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor. its officers, agents, and/or
employees, from any and all liability, loss. or damage to which Grantor. its officers, agents, and/or
employees may be subjected as the result of any act or omission by Grantee. its officers, agents or
Storm Drain Easement
~.C, Ir,. Co., a corp. to
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Ser/ai No. 65500A
RP File No. GRT990022
Affects SCE Documents: 206384 and 319127
employees arising out of the exercise by Grantee, its officers, agents, or employees, of any of the
rights granted to it by this instrument.
5. Grantee agrees that in the exercise of its rights hereunder, its contractors, employees and other
agents will maintain a minimum clearance of twenty-seven (27;00) feet between their equipment
and any and all overhead electric conductors.
6. Grantor shall have full unobstructed access to its facilities at all times and the right to clear, keep
clear, and remove any and all obstructions of any kind at ail times.
7. Grantor reserves for itself the right to trim any tree or trees which may grow in or on the above
described real property and which, in the opinion of Grantor, endanger or interfere with the proper
operation or maintenance of said electric transmission, distribution and communication lines, to
the extent necessary to prevent any such interference or danger.
8. 'l~ae above described reai property is to be used only for the purposes specified herein and in the
event:
a. said reai property is not so used:
b. said real property shall be vacated as a storm drain right of way; or
c. the project for which this Easement is being granted is abandoned,
d. the Easement shall thereupon, ipso facto, revert to and merge in the interest of Grantor in
the above described real property.
9. Upon termination or reversion of the rights herein granted, Grantee shall execute and deliver to
Grantor, within thirty (30) days after service of a written demand therefor, a good and sufficient
quitclaim deed to the rights herein given. Should Grantee fail or refuse to deliver to Grantor a
quitclaim deed, as aforesaid, a written notice by Grantor reciting the failure or refusal of Grantee
to execute and deliver said quitclaim deed as herein provided and terminating this Easement
shall, after ten (10) days from the date of recordation of said notice, be conclusive evidence against
Grantee and ,all persons claiming under Grantee of the termination or reversion of the rights
herein given.
10. As a controlling part of the consideration for the execution and delivery of this instrument by
Grantor, the Easement is accepted upon and subject to the express condition that the
improvement for which the Easement is given, regardless of the time performed, and any other
work or improvement commenced within two years from the date of recording of this Easement
'(which improvement and other work or improvement are hereinafter sometimes collectively called
"Improvement"] shall be done without any cost or expense whatsoever to Grantor, and that in the
ew.~nt a special assessment or assessments is or are levied by an authorized lawful body against
the real property of Grantor for the Improvement, Grantee agrees that it will reimburse Grantor
and it shall be the binding obligation of the Grantee to reimburse Grantor for the full amount of
any and all such speciai assessment or assessments so levied for said improvement and paid by
Grantor.
Storm Drain Easement
S.C.E. Co., a corp. to
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Serial No. 65500A
RP File No. GRq'990022
Affects SCE Documents: 206384 and 319127
11. Also as a controll/ng part of the consideration for the execution and delivery of this instrument by
Grantor, Grantee covenants, for itself, its successors and assigns, to construct and maintain the
improvement to be located on the above described real property at its own expense.
12. Grantee hereby recognizes Grantor's title and interest in and to the above described real property
and agrees never to assail or resist Grantor's title or interest therein.
13. Any earth fill placed by Grantee within the boundaries of the above described real property shall
have a relative compaction density of ninety percent (90%].
14. The fights hereby granted are not necessary or useful in the performance of the duties, of said l
G~ntor to the public.
15. Grantee agrees that all construction equipment, when not in use. shall be parked clear of Edison's
right afway and/or rendered immobile
16. Grantee agrees to maintain the above described real property in a condition satisfactory to
Grantor.
17. Any notice provided herein to be given by either party hereto to the other may be served by
depositing in the United States Post Office, psstage prepaid, a sealed envelope containing a copy of
such notice and addressed to said other party at its principal place of business.
18. Grantee shall place identification and location markers of a number, location and nature suitable
to Grantor. indicating the type, location and depth of any facilities, structures or equipment located
by Grantee in the underground of the above described real property.
19. Any underground facilities shall be buried in the ground so that the tops thereof shall be not less
than three (3.00} feet below the surface of the ground, shall be capable of supporting three-axle
vehicles weighing up to forty (40] tons, and shall be of such type of construction and material as to
be sufficient and safe for the purpose for which they are to be used.
20. Grantee shall promptly and properly replace the earth over any underground facilities, shall tamp
or water-settle such earth so that no depressions shall be left or shall develop in the surface of the
ground over said underground facilities, and shall restore the surface of the ground over said
underground facilities to as near its original condition and appearance as possible.
21. Upon the termination or reversion of the rights herein granted, Grantee shall at its own risk and
expense remove said storm drain and restore said above described real property as nearly as
possible to the same state and condition that it was in prior to any construction of said facilities,
but ff it should fail to do so within sixty (60} days after such termination, Grantor may do so at the
risk of Grantee. and all cost and expense of such removal and the restoration of said premises as
aforesaid, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent {10%} per annum shall be paid
by Grantee upon demand.
22. Grantee agrees to install sixteen-foot-wide double-drive gates at locations specified by Grantor.
I Zl
Storm Drain Easement
S.C.E. Co., a corp. to
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Serial No. 65500A
RP File No. GHT990022
Affects SCE Documents: 206384 and 319127
23. Grantee agrees that all fencing and metallic structures Installed within the above described real
property shall be adequately grounded.
24. Grantee agrees that no additional structures will be installed on the above described real property.
25. Grantee agrees that the construction of the storm drains must be adequately sloped, so as to
provide Grantor through access across the above described real property.
26. Grantee agrees not to store flammable materials nor store or park any vehicle on the above
described real property.
27. Any trees or plants within the above described real property shall be maintained by Grantee and
shall not exceed a height of fitteen (15) feet.
28. Grantee agrees that during any period of construction activity, it will periodically water down the
construction area within the above described real property, so as to prevent dust contamination of
Gx~ntor's facilities.
29. The use of the neuter gender herein will, when appropriate, be construed to mean either the
masculine or feminine gender or both. Unless expressly provided elsewhere, herein to the
contrary, the terms, covenants and conditions of this Easement shall inure to the benefit of and
are binding upon the heirs, successors, representatives and assigns of the parties hereto.
IN ~ WHEREOF, said Southern California Edison Company has caused this instrument
to be 'executed this ~7~ day of ~f~ ,20 ~-.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY,
a corporation
Genie L. Sanders
Right of Way Agent
Real Estate Operations Division
Corporate Real Estate Depa~'t~tent
122
Storm Drain Easement
S.C.,E. Co.. a corp. to
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Serial No. 65500A
RP File No. GRT990022
Affects SCE Documents: 206384 and 319127
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA does hereby accept the above and foregoing Easement upon
and subject to all of the terms, covenants and conditions therein contained, and does hereby agree to
comply with and perform each and all of said terms, covenants and conditions.
DATED as of this day of ,20
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF~~ )
,O,n- .~_~~,/~., before me, ,]/;~/~5 ,/~, /~-. , person~ly appe~ed
~ - ' __ person~y ~o~ to me (~ ~ ~ ~h~ ~a~i~
). to ~ ~e person whose n~e is subsc~bed to ~e ~ ~s~ment ~d
ac~owledged to me ~at (she/~) ~ecuted ~e s~e ~ (her/~) au~omed capaciW and ~at by
(her/~ sl~at~e on ~e ~s~ment ~e person, or ~e enOW upon beh~ of which ~e pe~on acted,
~ecuted ~e. ~s~ment.
~ my h~d ~d o~ci~ se~.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
On . before me, , personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person ~hose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that (she/he) executed the same in (her/his) authorized capacity and that by
(her/his) signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted.
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
EXHIBIT "A"
SERIAL 65500A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP I NORTH,
RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE
SOUTH 00°15'11" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER,
1141.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH
00°15'11" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 50.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 29°44'49" EAST, 69.60 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 37.50 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 31.98 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
48°51'56"; THENCE NORTH 78°36'45" EAST 132.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09°42'47" EAST,
30.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80°17'13" EAST, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09°42'47"
WEST, 16.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80017'27- EAST, 27.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE
OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 5853 PAGE 352 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 00°15'11" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE,
10.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 8163 PAGE 20, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH
74°17'35" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 342.81 FEET; THENCE
.LEAVING SAID RIGHT-QF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 85°26'20" WEST, 224.96 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 80°35'14" WEST, 115.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°36'45" WEST, 22.25 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 11°12'24" EAST, 5.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78°36'45" WEST, 159.17
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 62.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIO CURVE, 53.30 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48°51'56"; THENCE SOUTM 29°44'49, WEST, 26.30 FEET
TO SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; AND THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.43 ACRES
SEE EXHIBIT "B", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
PP, EPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING
MARK WARE, PLS 5820 ' DATE
EXP. 06/30/04
62 12 SD
EXHIBIT
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SERIAL 65500A
~%,,,,__ P.0.C.
NW COR., SW 1/4,
SEC. 20
/~ SW 1/4, SF'C, __',20
d o SCALE: 1 ": 1 OO'
~ 22.25'
S11'12'24"E
S29'44'49"W -- - -- ~- -
S09'42'47"1
30.68' ~' 11 "E
S00'15'11"1 N80tlT'15'E '27"E
N29'44'49"E 27.86'
16.0 SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
1101.00' OF THE W1/2 OF
THE SWl/4 OF SEC. 20.
240,00'
L=53.30'
(~ D=48'51'56"
R=62.50'
L=51.98' ETIWANDA - PADUA 220KV T/L R/W
(~ 0=48'51'56"
R=37.50' MAP SHOWING STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
~;~ FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY TO U.C.P., INC.
2Z,~V~' ~--] LAND Of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY PER 8s3/`3 20.R,
ARE,, /2.5
APPROX. 0.4.3 ACRES
M:\SURV~'I \_SURVEY~ 12 t 03\LEGALS\EXHrBiTB\62_SD_i2,OWG
EXHIBIT "A"-
SERIAL 65500A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTIQN 29, AND THAT PORTION OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, ALL WITHIN TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6
WEST, S.B.B.M., COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAID PORTIONS BEING A' STRIP OF
LAND 25.00 FEET IN WIDTH, WITH 12.50 FEET LYING ON EACH SIDE, THE CENTERLINE
OF SAID STRIP IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE SOUTH
00°23'58" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 104.51 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE NORTH
29°44'49" EAST, 75.16 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 66.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE 70.10 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60°51'08"; TO A POINT ON A
LINE 5.00 FEET SOUTH AND PARALLEL VVITH THE NORTH OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE
SOUTH 89°24'03" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 144.05 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE
240.00 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 29, SAID POINT
BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS.
THE SIDELINES OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED STRIP SHALL BE PROLONGED OR
SHORTENED AS TO TERMINATE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 29, AND A LINE
240.00 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE VVEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 AND 29,
...... "RESPECTIVELY. -.. ·
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES
SEE EXHIBIT "B", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING
MARK WARE, PLS 5820 DATE
EXP. 06/30/04
EXHA_UNIV_I3
EXHIBIT "B"'--'
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SERIAL 65500A
SCALE: 1"=100'
WEST LINE OF THE ,::. 240.00' W '1/2, SW ] ./4,
sw 1/4, SEC. 20 - - SEC. 20
P.O.C. ~.
Nw coR.,",, :
SEC. 29 ~ m S89'24'05"E
~ 144.05' P.O.T.
-' -' ,.,.; o ~-'/ __ ~: WILSON AVENUE
o~? R=66.00' NORTH LINE OF
04~ D=60'51'08" SECTION 29
L=70.10'
T.P..O.B. rn ' N29'44'49"E
75.16'
WEST LINE OF
NW 1/4, SEC. 29 W ]/2, J'"JW '~/4,
SEC. _92
240.00'
ETIWANDA - PADUA 220KV T/L R/W
MAP SHOWING STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY TO CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
COMPANY PER 5855 352 O.R.
AR EA
APPROX, 0.17ACRES
1 .7
RESOLUTION NO. {~)~.'-~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY ENGINEER TO ACCEPT GRANTS OF A ROAD
EASEMENT AND A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT FROM
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, SUBJECT TO THE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREON, AND TO CAUSE THE
SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON FOR RECORDATION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously approved improvement agreements and improvement securities for the
installation of street and storm drain improvements across Southern California Edison
property, between Day Creek Channel and the Rancho Etiwanda development; and
WHEREAS, Southern California Edison has executed grants of a road easement
and two storm drain easements, subject to terms and conditions that preserve their
rights to operate within and across said easements.
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: that said Easements submitted
by Southern California Edison be the same, and the City Engineer is hereby authorized
to sign said Easements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
T H E C I T Y 0 F
I~AN Cfi 0 CIICA~ONG^
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECr: APPROVAL OF RELEASE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL
MAP 8901, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CENTER AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the
real property improvement contract and lien agreement for Pamel 1 of Pamel Map
8901 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Resolution approving same
and cause same Resolution to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
A real property improvement contract and lien agreement for Parcel Map 8901 was
approved by City Council on January 20, 1987, and recorded as document
87.-059282. Parcel 2 of Pamel Map 8901 was released from this contract in 1988.
The agreement was for construction of missing off-site street improvements along
Foothill Boulevard, namely the median island. This median has been constructed
thus eliminating the need for the real property improvement contract and lien
agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Cit/Engineer
WdO:SH:sc
Attachment
~':lq
Vicinity Map
RELEASE OF LIEN AGREEMENT
PARCEL 1 OF PM 8901
RESOLUTION NO. O ~.- ~. ~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING OF
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 8901,
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AND CENTER AVENUE
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, adopted
Resolution No. 87-046 accepting a real property improvement contract and lien
agreement for Parcel Map 8901; and
WHEREAS, Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8901 was released May 18, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the improvements required under the lien agreement have been
constructed and said real property improvement contract and lien agreement is no
longer required;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said real property improvement contract and
lien agreement from Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 8901, and the Mayor is authorized to sign
this resolution and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause Release of
Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San
Bernardino, State of California.
151
T H C ) T Y 0 f
Mf
I~AN C ff 0 C U CAM ON GA
Memorandum
DATM: November t 9, ~00~
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Co.u. ncil
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager'
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~--'~-~
BY: Mark Brawthenl Contract Engineer
SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 20, 2002, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - CONSENT
CALENDAR D-16 - APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00185, LOCATED ON THE
EAST SIDE OF THE KNUCKLE INTERSECTION OF DORSET
STREET AND CARTILLA AVENUE (EAST OF CENTER AVE
SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET)
The developer, Rancho Pacific, was unable to process and return the signed and
completed Consent and Waiver Agreements on time as originally and reasonably
contemplated. This item should be removed from the agenda. The item will be
brought back to City Council at a later date.
W JO:MB:sc
RANCHO C U C a M O N G A
E N C IN E ~ 1~] N G DI~ PAI~ TH E N ?
Sti ffReport
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJECT': APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00185,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE KNUCKLE
INTERSECTION OF DORSET STREET AND CARTILLA AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY RANCHO PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
DRC2002-00185, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00185, located on the southeast corner of the knuckle intersection of Dorset
Street and Cartilla Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 26,
2002, for the remodel of an existing industrial building and street improvements.
The Developer, Rancho Pacific Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement
and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $7,400.00
Labor and Material Bond: $3,700.00
15z.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2002-00185
November 20, 2002
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the
City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted~
City Engineer
WJO:MNB:sc
Attachments
155
N.T.S.
,"1'
" . -- .0~1-
· z~,,~'~'~' DRC2002-00185.
h"OO T H/L.L. E~-~ VD. ·
'1
City of Rancho Cucamon.qa
: /~,./
NO. 2 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI .IFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00185
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement by Rancho Pacific Development Corporation as
developer, for the street improvements adjacent to the real property specifically described therein,
and generally located on the southeast comer of the knuckle intersection of Dorset SWeet and Cartilla
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as DRC2002-00185; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney.
/,55
RESOLUTION NO. & ~" 2 q ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00185
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
re~,;olutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XII~D of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
as,';essments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Irnprovements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
fot~ns entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Te:rritory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2002-00185
November 20, 2002
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Tendtory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I-I~,REBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
RANCHO PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORP., a California corporation
The legal description of the Property is:
Lot 12 of Tract No. 11428, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of
California, as per plat recorded in Book 158 of Maps, Pages 19, 20, and 21 records of said County.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a pm hereof.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
~.A~SCA~'~. MA~'~A~C~ D~S~ ~o. ~
u~ ~~cs ~T~ ~os. ~ ~ ~
~v ~tqHT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: ~oRr.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO '
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SHEET
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands,
parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87
acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the
maintenance building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City
but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses
the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill
Boulevard.
B-1 /qb
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: DRC2002-00185 (No addition to work program - private streets)
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD#1 ...............
SLD#6 ...............
Community Trail Turf Non-Tuff Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L 3B ............
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B
N/A 2.08 4.16 2.08 2.08
2 it//
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
surnmarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l~and lT~e lTnit Tyne lTnit~ lTnit~ Factnr ITnit~ Unit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00185) is:
2.08 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $733.82 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
I and llge llnit Tx, ne lTnit~ llnits Factnr llnitg ITnit Re. venue
Single Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Family
Multi-
Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00185) is:
2.08 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $73.92 Annual Assessment
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l.and Use lTnit Tyne lInit~ lInit~ Factnr [lnit~ Unit Revenue
CoJmn/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00185) is:
2.08 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $106.91 Annual Assessment
R a N C h O C U C a M O N G A
ENGINEERING DE PART~IENT
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL
MAP 15781, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD,
SUBMI'I-I'ED BY RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel
Map 15781, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 and authorizing the Mayor and the
City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tentative Parcel Map 15781, located at the northwest and southwest corners of
Highland Avenue at Day Creek Boulevard, in the Village Commercial District of the
Victoria Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 24,
2002, for the division of 12.59 acres into five parcels.
The Developer, Ralphs Grocery Company, has placed an Improvement Certificate on
the four-lot final map stating that all frontage improvements will be completed upon
development of the first parcel. Said improvements plans and the on-site plans for
related Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00638 are currently in plan check.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PM 15781
November 20, 2002
Page 2
The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the
City Clerk's office. C.C. & R's have also been approved by the City Attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
WilliE'm J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sc
Attachments
/ z/5
~' PARCEL 4. PARCEL ~. ~.
eLY .1~ W
T1H, R6W
PARCEL ~ ~ ,,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15781, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15781, submitted by PRP Investors, and consisting of
five parcels, located at the northwest and southwest comers of Highland Avenue and Day Creek
Boalevard, being a division of 12.59 acres, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on July 24, 2002, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and
Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15781, which consists of four lots, is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on, and is in substantial conformance with, said Tentative Parcel
Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by placement of an Improvement Certificate on
the final map by Ralphs Grocery Company as developer; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for
street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I-IEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said
Parcel Map No. 15781 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP
15781
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
ten'itory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XlllD of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XlllD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
tenitory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
tin,race the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
PROJECT
Date
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIlD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment'set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Temtory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL 1:
THE EAST ¥2 OF THE WEST V2 OF TH~ NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP I NORTH,
RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN TH~ CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO TH~
OI~ICIAL PLAT THEREOF.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED IANUARY 22,
1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 98-021535, OlqqCIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST ¥2 OF THE WEST ¥2 OF TH~ NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 32,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING TO TH~ OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL
DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1885, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE WEST V2 OF THE
NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 32; THENCE NORTH 0008'38" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID EAST V2 OF THE WEST V2 OF THE NORTH~VEST ¼ OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 2125.63
FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES, NORTH 89051'22" WEST, 120.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
0°08'01' WEST, 188.86 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A
RP~D1US OF 2458.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF l°38'08', AN ARC LENGTH OF 70.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°30'07" EAST, 239.50
FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADiUS OF 2337.60
FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 °38'45'
AN ARC LENGTH OF 67.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0008'38" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID
EASTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE WEST ½ OF TH~ NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 32,
1559.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID EAST V2 OF THE WEST ½ OF THE NORTHWEST
¼ OF SECTION 32; THENCE SOUTH 89°49'14'' EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 111.55
FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 15871-1, 1N BOOK
274, PAGES 89 TO 95, INCLUSIVE AND TRACT NO. 15871-2, IN BOOK 274, PAGES 96 TO 100,
iNCLUSWE OF MAPS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA BY GRANT DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
20010041169 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
156
E~ahibit "A" continued
PARCEL 2:
THE WEST V2 OF THE WEST V2 OF THE NORTHWEST 2,4 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND APPROVED BY THE SURVEYOR GENERAL, DATED
NOVEMBER 13, 1885.
E3~'CEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 50 FEET, AS DEEDED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, BY DEED RECORDED MAY 2, 1947, IN BOOK 2052, PAGE 126,
OF]gICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SOUTHERN CAI JFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 2, 1962, IN BOOK 5655, PAGE 385, OFFICIAL
RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST IA OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST,
SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST IA WITH A
LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 270 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES
FROM THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST lA; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE TO A POINT THAT IS 1200 FEET NORTHERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES
FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST IA; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE
INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTH LINE WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 300 FEET
EASTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID WEST LINE.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 15871-1, IN BOOK
274., PAGES 89 TO 95 INCLUSIVE AND TRACT NO. 15871-2, IN BOOK 274, PAGES 96 TO I00
INCLUSIVE OF MAPS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
CA/LIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20010041169 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 1089-021-09 AND 1089-021-10
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-3 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
^-2 I,$1
Vicinity Map
~ 152.
NORTH ~ NTS
CITY OF ITEM: LMD 2; SLD
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Parcel Map 15781
ENGINEEI*3NG DIVISION EXHIBIT: A-3
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LA~NDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria
Pl~tnned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit
derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that
conununity. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels
within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos,
community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park,
Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STRF~ET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of :;treet lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally, this
area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north
of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this
district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of streetlights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: Parcel Map 15781
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 2*
SLD # 3 23
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L 2 9760** 114
*Existing items installed with original project
**Parkways across SCE corridor
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres S 1 S 3 L 2
1 6.52 13.04 13.04 13.04
2 3.65 7.30 7.30 7.30
3 1.37 2.74 2.74 2.74
4 1.05 2.10 2.10 2.10
12.59
/5'q
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LJ~IDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of Assessment # of Rate Per
Physical Units Factor Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 5001 1.00 5001 $422.00 $2,110,422.00
Multi-
Parcel 124 1.00 124 $422.00 $52,328.00
Family
Comm/Ind. Acre 21.59 2.00 43.18 $422.00 $18,221.96
Vacant Acre 326.47 0.25 81.62 $422.00 $34,442.65
TOTAL $2,215,414.61
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15781) is:
12.59 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $10,625.96 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
[,and TIKe lTnlt Tyne TTnlt~ TTnlt~ gzactor ITnit~ [Init Revenue
Single
Far0Jly Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31
Multi-
Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54
Family
Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66
TOTAL $564,777.51
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15781) is:
12.59 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $447.45 Annual Assessment
C-1
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
I.and llse lTnit Tyne llnits Ilnits Factor lTnit~ Ii'nit Revenue
Single Parcel 5001 1.00 5001 $47.15 $235,797.15
Family
Multi-
Unit 124 1.00 ! 24 $47. ! 5 $5,846.60
Family
Commercial Acre 47.61 2.00 95.22 $47.15 $4,489.62
TOTAL $246,133.37
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15781) is:
12.59 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $1,187.24 Annual Assessment
T H E C I T Y 0 F
I~3. N CII 0 CIICAH ON GA
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
'to: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FF--K)M: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RELEASE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 84-02, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF
JERSEY BOULEVARD AND BOSTON PLACE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the
real property improvement contract and lien agreement for Development Review
84-02 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Resolution approving same
arid cause same Resolution to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
A real property improvement contract and lien agreement for Development Review
84-02 was approved by City Council on October 3, 1984, and recorded as document
number 84-256174. The agreement is for construction of missing off-site street
improvements, namely the east side cul-de-sac of Boston Place. Boston Place has
been constructed thus eliminating the need for the real property improvement
contract and lien agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:SH:sc
Attachment
/$7
Vicinity Map
RELEASE OF LIEN AGREEMENTEi
DR 84-02
RESOLUTION NO. ~' ~ ~1/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING OF
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-02,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JERSEY
BOULEVARD AND BOSTON PLACE
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, adopted
Resolution No. 84-255 accepting a real properly improvement contract and lien
agreement for Development Review 84-02; and
WHEREAS, the improvements required under the lien agreement have been
constructed and said real property improvement contract and lien agreement is no
longer required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said real property improvement contract and
lien agreement from Development Review 84-02, and the Mayor is authorized to sign
this resolution and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause Release of
Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San
- Bernardino, State of California.
R A N C h O C U C a M O N G A
ENGINEERING DE PARTI'IENT
Staff Report
DA3'F_: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry a. Dyer, Associate Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technfcian
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $586,564.00 ($533,240.00 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.,
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOOTHILL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
FROM ETIWANDA AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY, TO BE FUNDED FROM AD 84-
1 DAY CREEK FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 16023035650/1414602-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $586,564.00 ($533,240.00 plus 10% contingency) to the
apparent Iow bidder, Albert W. Davies, Inc., for the construction of the Foothill Storm Drain
Improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to 1600' Easterly, to be funded from AD 84-1 Day Creek
Funds, Account No. 16023035650/1414602-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on November 5, 2002, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $621,300.00. Staff has reviewed ail bids received
and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities
to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
ReSubmitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachment
BID SUMMARy FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 5, 2002 APP/IRENTLOWB1DDER
Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Etiwanda ENGINEERS COST H & H General
Avenue to 1600' Easterly ESTIMATE Albert W. Davies, Inc. Contractors~ !nc; Paulus l*.nginoorlng~ !nc,
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNI3 DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST ~ AMOUNT
1. 56 LF Comt~uct42" RCP 1300D S.D. w/ watertight ioint; $250.00 $14,000.00 $224.00 $12~544.00 $459.00 $25~704.00 $542.00 $30,352.00
2. 1464 LF Construct 78" RCP 1300D S.D. w/ watertight ioint: $300.00 $439~200.00 $289.00 $423~096.00 $306.00 $447~984.00 $280.00 $409~920.00
3. 1 LS Bracing and Shoring $75,000.00 $75~000.00 $8~000.00 $8~000.00 $5~400.00 $5~400.00 $8?000.00 $8,000.00
4. 2 EA MHNo 2 $51000.00 $10~000.00 $51950.00 $11~900.0E $4,100.00 $8,200.00 $8~500.00 $17~000.00
5. 2 EA MHNo4 $8~000.00 $16~000.00 $19,800.012 $39~600.013 $12~903.00 $25~806.00 $23~000.00 $46~000.00
6. 6 EA Utihty Conduit Support $900.00 $57400.0C $850.013 $5,100.013 $500.00 $3~000.00 $750.00 $4~500.00
7. I LS Pothole Utilities $4~500.00 $4~500.0¢ $3~800.013 $3~800.00 $3,552.00i $3~552.00 $8?000.00 $8~000.00
8. 1 LS Remove andReplace Median $5~000.00i $57000.013 $6~500.00 $6?500.00 $6~300.001 $6~300.00 $3~500.00 $37500.00
9. 1 LS Traffic Control~ including K rail $30~000.013 $30~000.00 $12~000.00 $12~000.00 $6~500.00 $6~500.013 $9,000.00 $9~000.00
10. I LS Signing and Striping $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4~560.00 $4~560.0fl $4,500.00 $4~500.00
11. 17 EA Replace TS Loops $600.00 $10,200.00 $300.00 $5~I00.00 $252.00 $4,284.013 $500.00 $8~500.00
12. 2 EA Constmct Storm Drain bulkhead $1~000.00 $2,000.00 $1~300.00 $2~600.00 $780.00 $1~560.013 $1~820.00 $3~640.00
TOTAL $621~300.00 I $533?240.00 $542,850.013 $552~912.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 5, 2002 Southern California
Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Etiwanda Underground Beador Construction
Avenue to 1600' Easterly K.C. Construction Company Contractors, Inc. Company, Inc.
UNIT BID CORRECTEr UNIT UNIT
IgO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1 56 LF Construct 42" RCP 1300D S.D. w/watertight joint $75.45 $4,225.01 $4,225.20 $150.00 $8,400.00 $220.00 $12,320.00
2. 1464 LF Conslruct 78" RCP 1300D S.D.w/watertightjoint $310.80 $455,018.26 $455,011.20 $285.00 $417,240.00 $300.00 $439,200.00
3. 1 LS Bracing andShormg $14,361.33 $14,361.33 $14,361.33 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $55,780.00 $55,780.00
4. 2 EA MHNo2 $10,331.90 $20,663.79 $20,663.80 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 $6,000.00 $12,000.00
5. 2 EA MHNo4 $10,331.90 $20,663.79 $20,663.80 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00
6. 6 EA Utility Conduit Support $794.76 $4,768.57 $4,768.56 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $800.00 $4,800.00
7. I LS Pothole Utilities $3,655.90 $3,655.90 $3,655.90 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
8. I LS Remove and Replace Median $3,179.04 $3,179.04 $3,179.04 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
9. 1 LS Traffic Control, including K rail $12,700.28 $12,700.28 $12,700.28 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
10. 1 LS signmgand Striping $19,074.27 $19,074.27 $19,074.27 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00
11.,,,.._ 17 EA Replace TS Loops $794.76 $13,510.94 $13,510.92 $300.00 $5,100.00 $300.00 $5,100.00
12.[,n~ 2 EA Construct Storm Drain bulkhead $1,112.67 $2,225.33 $2,225.34 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
~-~ TOTAL $574,046.53 $574,039.64 $576,740.00 $601,700.00
Page 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING NOVEMBER 5, 2002
Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Etiwanda Greg J. Harris C.P. Construction Co., Norstar Plumbing and
Avenue to 1600' Easterl}' Construction Inc. S.J. Burkhardt Inc. Engineering
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO (~TY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 56 LF Eonstmct 42" RCP 1300D S.D. w/watertight ioin~ $330.00 $18~480.00 $245.00 $13,720.00 $320.00 $17~920.00 $700.00 $39,200.00
2. 1464 LF Eonslxuct 78" RCP 1300D S.D.w/watertightioim $330.00 $483~120.00 $350.00 $512,400.00 $405.00 $592~920.00 $265.00 $387,960.00
3. 1 LS Bracing and Shoring $6~600.00 $6~600.00 $30~000.00 $30~000.00 $6?000.00 $6~000.00 $110~000.00 $110~000.00
4. 21 EA MHNo 2 $8~800.00 $177600.00 $4,950.00 $9,900.00 $7~000.001 $14~000.00 $10~000.00 $20~000.00
5. 2 EA MHNo4 $22~000.00 $44~000.00 $10,250.00 $20~500.00 $29~000.00 $587000.01~ $25,000.00 $50~000.00
6. ~ EA Utiliw Conduit Support $1~100.00 $6~600~00 $950.00 $5~700.00 $800.00 $4?800.00 $4,000.00 $24,000.00
7. LS Pothole Utilities $4~400.00 $4,400.00 $6?500.00 $6~500.00 $1,000.00 $1~000.00 $10~000.00 $10~000.00
8. LS Remove and Replace Median $4~400.00 $4?400.00 $50~000.00 $50~000.00 $4?000.00 $4,000.00 $15,000.00 $15~000.00
9. LS rrafficControl, including K rail $16~500.00 $16~500.00 $25~000.00 $25~000.00 $11~000.00 $11,000.00 $145~000.00 $145~000.00
10. L$ Isi g and Striping $8,000.00 $8~000.00 $4,500.00 $4~500.00 $8,800.00 $87800.00 $45~000.00 $45~000.00
11. 17 EA .Replace TS Loops $220.00 $3~740.00 $495.00 $8~415.00 $400.00 $6~800.00 $650.00 $11,050.013
12. 2 EA Construct Storm Drain bulkhead $2,200.00 $4~400.00 $950.00 $1~900.00 $500.00 $1~000.00 $3~000.00 $6~000.00
TOTAL $617,840.00 $688~535.00 $726,240.00 $863,210.0~2
Page 2
~o ;r.~_~y PROJECT LOCATION
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOOTHILL BLVD. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
FROM ETIWANDA AVE, TO 1600' EASTERLY
VICINITY MAP
T FI E C I T Y O F
]~ANCHO CUCAHONGA
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A POLICY FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 FOR PROPOSED
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached Resolution providing a City policy direction for the use of the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 as it pertains to proposed Community
Facilities District 2003-01.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted polices for Mello-Roos and
Assessment District formations under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of
1982. The policy sets forth goals and guidelines to assist property owners in
following the City's approach to community facilities district financing.
Over the past several months, landowners in the eastern portion of the City have
been meeting with Redevelopment Agency and City staff to discuss formation of a
Community Facilities District to fund public improvements. As a result of these
discussion, formation documents are currently being drafted for consideration by the
City Council in mid-December. This policy direction is requested at this time so that
final documents can be prepared for approval.
//.,,./
Page 2
November 20, 2002
Mello-Roos Policy
The City's policy for Mello-Roos Districts indicates all property within a District is
subject to the special tax assessed to support the bonds. The exception is the
exclusion of publicly owned property, property to be dedicated to public entities,
property held by home owner's association, or designated open space.
Development of the regional shopping center site creates a unique situation with
regard to this policy, and as a result the developer has requested consideration of a
policy that would pertain exclusively to formation of CFD 2003-01. As a condition to
locating a retail store within Victoria Gardens, the major retail anchors are unwilling
to accept the special tax associated with the improvements. This is common
practice for major retail stores in regional shopping centers, and without
commitments from major retail tenants, the developer will be unable to construct the
project. Therefore, the developer requests the land that is to be sold to major
anchor retail tenants, approximately 10.57 acres be excluded and not taxed. In
addition, the developer has requested that land to be ground leased to the Agency
for two parking structures, approximately 4.25 acres, also be excluded from the
special tax. The location of these parcels is generally shown on the attached exhibit.
The District has been structured in Zones so that the balance of the commercially
zoned property within the regional center acreage will support the cost of
improvements associated with the excluded area. The tax will not be assessed to
any residential or commercial property in the remaining zone within the proposed
District. Bonds will not be sold until all conditions of the Disposition and
Development Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and Victoria
Gardens-C, LLC, have been met.
Upon approval of the attached Resolution, this additional policy will pertain
exclusively to the proposed CFD 2003-01. All other requirements of the City's Goals
and Policies for the Use of Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 remain in
full effect.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA WAIVING CERTAIN POLICIES SET
FORTH IN THE CITY'S STATEMENT OF GOALS AND
POLICIES FOR THE USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS
COMMUNITIES FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 IN CONNECTION
WITH PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2003-01
RECITALS:
A. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California proposes to undertake
proceedings pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended,
commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the "Act") to form a
community facilities district to be designated "City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities
District No. 2003-01" and to be located gcncrally south of Church Strcct, cast of Rochesler
Awmuc, north o1' Aa-row Routc m~d west of Interstatc 15 in tim Ci/y of Rancho Cucainonga.
B. The Act provides that the City Council may initiate proceedings to establish a
community facilities district pursuant to the Act only if it has first considered and adopted local
goals and policies concerning the use of the Act.
C. Pursuant to its Resolution No. 99-154, adopted on July 21, 1999, the City Council
adopted the "Statement of Goals and Policies for the Use of the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Goals and Policies") which are on file in the office of the City Clerk
and available for public inspection.
D. The Goals and Policies provide that the City may find in limited and exceptional
instances that a waiver to any of the policies stated in the Goals and Policies is reasonable given
identified special City benefits to be derived from such waiver, with such waivers to be granted
by action of the City Council based upon specific public purpose or health and safety findings.
E. City Staff has recommended that the City Council waive certain policies set forth in
the Goals and Policies in connection with proposed Community Facilities District No. 2003-01
and the City Council desires to waive such policies in accordance with the Staff's
recommendation and based upon the special benefits identified by Staff to be derived from such
waiver and the specific public purpose identified by Staff to be served by such waiver.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. In connection with proposed Community Facilities District No. 2003-01, the
City Council hereby waives the requirement set forth in the third paragraph of Section W of the
Goals and Policies that all property not otherwise exempted by the Act from taxation shall be
subject to the special tax. Such waiver will allow the major retail anchor pads of the planned
11231\0074\712834.1
Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center and privately-owned garages which are to be leased
to tlhe City to be exempted from the proposed special tax.
Section 2. In connection with proposed Community Facilities District No. 2003-01, the
City Council also hereby waives the requirement set forth in the eighth paragraph of Section 1V
of the Goals and Policies that the total maximum annual special taxes that can be collected from
taxable property in a community facilities district, taking into account any potential changes in
land use or development density or rate, and less all projected administrative expenses, must be
equal to at least 110 percent of the gross annual debt service on any bonds issued by or on behalf
of the district in each year that said bonds will remain outstanding. At the time of formation of
proposed Community Facilities District No. 2003-01, the maximum special taxes will provide
110 percent coverage for the debt service on the proposed bonds for the District. However, a
waiver of this requirement is necessary in that the proposed rate and method of apportionment of
the special taxes provides that no special tax shall be levied on any public property, meaning that
debt service coverage could fall below 110 percent depending on how much property, if any, is
transferred to a public agency subsequent to the formation of the Community Facilities District
No. 2003-01.
Section 3. Based on the report and recommendation of City Staff presented to the City
Council at this meeting and other information presented to the City Council, the City Council
hereby finds that the waiver of certain policies set forth in the Goals and Policies as described
herein is reasonable and serves a public purpose.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2002.
11231 \0074\712834.1 -2-
T H E CITY 0 F
~AN ClIO CU CAH 0 N GA
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale Catron, City Facilities Supervisor
DATE: November 20, 2002
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE AWARD OF A WINDOW
CLEANING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR VARIOUS CITY
FACILITIES~ PER THE BIDS RECEIVED TO SUNSHINE
WINDOWS~ OF UPLAND~ IN AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $34~600.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the award of a window cleaning
services contract for various City facilities for 2002-03, with an option to renew for an
additional two years, per the bids received to Sunshine Windows, of Upland, in an
annual amount not to exceed $34,600.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Engineering Department provided specifications to Purchasing for'window
cleaning services. Purchasing prepared a Request for Bid and mailed it to seven (7)
vendors. Three (3) bids were received. After analysis of the bids by Engineering and
Purchasing staff, it has been determined that the award should be made to the lowest,
most responsive and responsible vendor that most closely meets the specifications as
required by the Engineering Department.
LOCATION
The following primary buildings will be serviced: Civic Center, Police Department,
Stadium, Animal Shelter, Senior Center, Lions East, Lions West, 9th Street Yard, and
the Library. Any additional buildings will be serviced as needed.
/Besp~ully submitted, .
~V~3li6m J. O'Neil
City Engineer /~
R a N C H O C U C A M O N G A
~ NC, I}~ 1~1~1~ G ~) ~ I~AI~THI~N T
Staff Report
DA'l'fi: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer ~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 08083234 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $10,359.43, FOR THE LEMON AVENUE PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 01-039
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance
Guarantee Bond No. 08083234 in the amount of $10,359.43 for the Lemon Avenue
Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street, Contract No. 01-039.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Laird Construction Co., Inc.
9460 Lucas Ranch Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Respectfully submitted,
Wli~O,Neil
City Engineer
WJO;LH/RO:Is
Attachments
LEMON A~'ENUE PAYEMENT REHABILITATION
(FROM CAI~NET.T~N STREET TO BERYL STREET)
" 171
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
~NGIN~I~IN G DE PAI~TM~NT
$ ffRepo
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ~ ~,~
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer(5~-'
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. AE2664674 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $8,968.80, FOR THE AMETHYST AVENUE STREET
AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM 300 FEET NORTH OF
ROBERDS COURT TO 450 FEET NORTH, CONTRACT NO. 01-045
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance
Guarantee Bond No. AE2664674 in the amount of $8,968.80 for the Amethyst Avenue
Street and Storm Drain Improvements from 300 Feet North of Roberds Court to 450 Feet
North, Contract No. 01-045.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: J.A. Salazar Construction Co.
14937 Rayfield Drive
La Mirada, CA 90638
Respectfully submitted~
City Engineer
WJO:LH/RO:Is
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
24TH ST
~gTH ST I II
FOOTHILL
BNSF RR
4THST
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G a
I~i~GINI~]~ I21N G D~ PAI:2TbII~NT
$ fRelx
~ovember 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
~OM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer ~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ~
SU~E~: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUA~NTEE BOND NO. CB48691 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $3,657.80, FOR THE NORTH ETIWANDA SECURITY
WALL BE~EEN SOUTH TERMINI OF STEPHENS PLACE AND KOCH
P~CE, CONTACT NO. 01-046
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance
Guarantee Bond No. CB48691 in the amount of $3,657.80 for the Nodh Etiwanda
Security Wall Be~een South Termini of Stephens Place and Koch Place, Contract No.
01-046.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance pedod has ended and the street improvements
remain free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: Vido Sama~ich, Inc.
4972 Cres~iew Place
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Ci~ fin~inoor
At~chmon~
! L'-I ~ :-
· _ SUMMIT AV~.--7 ...........: ......
~UMM~T. ' - :'
VICINITY MAP
Not '~o $c. le
DRIVE: ~
: HOPPE DRIVE
I JECT WALL
I --~ ........... ~ '-
SAN SEVATr~ _.
RETENTION BASIN
'PROJECT WALL
NORTH ETIWANDA SECURITY WALL
' /75
ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~'/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRC2002-00770, TO ESTABLISH A UNIQUE PARKING RATIO FOR A
SENIOR APARTMENT PROJECT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET AS PROVIDED
FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-082-53 THRU 57.
A. Recitals.
(i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a
waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and
discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make
maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the
project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules
and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning
process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic
costs of development."
(ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal
or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this
article..."
(iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows:
"A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the
permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, and provisions for rese~ation or dedication of land for public purposes.
The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and
requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses
and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..."
(iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference is proposed Development Agreement DRC2002-00770, concerning that property
located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue, and as legally described
in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the Development
Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement."
cI'rY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00770 - KISCO SENIOR LIVING
November 6, 2002
Page 2
(v) On October 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said
hearing on that date and recommended approval through the adoption of its Resolution
No.20-103.
(vi) On November 6, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing concerning the request.
(vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Initial
Study Parts I and II, the Development Agreement, and certified the Mitigated Negative
Declaration in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder.
SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-referenced
public hearings on October 23, and November 6, 2002, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a) The location, design, and proposes uses set forth in this Development Agreement
are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity.
b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good
zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement.
SECTION 5' This Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2002-00499,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin,
a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
/'77
RECORDING REQUESTED BY RECORDING FEES EXEMPT DUE TO
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383
COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP
222 Kearny Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108 City Clerk
Attn: Harry O'Brien, Esq.
(Space Above Line For Recorder's Use Only)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
KSL RC, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENT
I. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................. 2
II. BENEFITS TO CITY ....................................................................................................... 3
IlL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................... 3
A. Permitted Uses ........................................................................................................ 3
B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies ................................................................ 3
1. Applicable Rules ......................................................................................... 3
2. Required Parking Ratio for Project ............................................................. 3
3. Restrictive Covenant for Senior Housing ................................................... 4
4. Conflicting Enactments with Respect to Parking ....................................... 4
C. Future Approvals .................................................................................................... 4
D. Permitted Conditions .............................................................................................. 4
E. Term of Map(s) and Other Project Approvals ........................................................ 4
F. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in
Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo ........................................................ 5
G. Moratorium ............................................................................................................. 5
H. Vesting of Owner's Rights ...................................................................................... 5
I. Development Agreement/Project Approvals .......................................................... 5
IV. COOPERATION/IM PLEMENTATION ....................................................................... 5
A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents ................................................ 5
B. Processing During Third Party Litigation ............................................................... 5
C. State, Federal or Case Law ..................................................................................... 6
D. Other Governmental Bodies ................................................................................... 6
E. Defense of Agreement ............................................................................................ 6
V. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................... 6
A. Covenants Run with the Land ................................................................................. 6
B. Transfers and Assignments ..................................................................................... 7
1. Right to Assign ........................................................................................... 7
2. Liabilities Upon Transfer ............................................................................ 7
C. Mortgagee Protection .............................................................................................. 7
D. Statement of Compliance ........................................................................................ 8
710481.4
E. Default ..................................................................................................................... 8
F. Annual Review ........................................................................................................ 8
G. Default by City ........................................................................................................ 9
H. Legal Action ............................................................................................................ 9
I. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative ............................................................................. 1 0
J. Future Litigation Expenses ................................................................................... 10
1. Payment to Prevailing Party ...................................................................... 1 0
2. Scope of Fees ............................................................................................ 10
3. Term ...................................................................................................................... 1 0
L. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws ........................................... 1 1
1. Permitted Delays ....................................................................................... 1 1
2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws ............................................................. 1 1
M. Amendment of Agreement .................................................................................... 1 1
V1. MISCELLANEOUS ....................................................................................................... 1 1
A. Negation of Partnership ........................................................................................ 1 1
B. No Third Party Beneficiary ................................................................................... 11
C. Entire Agreement .................................................................................................. 11
D. Severability ........................................................................................................... 12
E. Construction of Agreement ................................................................................... 1 2
F. Section Headings .................................................................................................. 12
G. Applicable Law ..................................................................................................... 12
H. Notices .................................................................................................................. 12
I. Time is of the Essence .......................................................................................... 1 3
J. Limitation of Liability ........................................................................................... 13
K. Recordation ........................................................................................................... 1 3
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
ii
710481.4 t~~
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND KSL RC, L.P.
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of
this __ day of ,2002, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation and general law city ("City"), and KSL RC, L.P., a California limited
partnership ("Owner").
WITNESS. ETH:
A. The lack of certainty in thc approval of development projects can result in a waste
of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development, and discourage investment in
and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of
resources at the least economic cost to the public.
B. California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5 (the "Development
Agreement Statute") were therefore enacted authorizing a municipality to enter into binding
development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property.
C. Owner has a legal or equitable interest in certain real property located in City
morc particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property").
D. On ., 2002, the City Council (the "Council") made a determination
pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162, that the proposed development of the Property is within the scope of thc
previously certified Environmental Impact Reports for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan and the
General Plan Update, and that no additional environmental review is required.
E. Concurrently with adoption of the Ordinance approving this Agreement, the City
Planner has approved Development Plan Review No. DRC2002-00499 ("Development
Review"). This Agreement and the Development Review shall constitute the "Project
Approvals."
F. Development of thc Project into a 264 unit senior residential community,
including associated amenities (the "Project"), will further the comprehensive planning
objectives contained within City's General Plan, as amended, and will result in public benefits,
including, among others, the following:
1. Fulfilling long-term economic and social goals for City and the
community;
2. Providing fiscal benefits to City's General Fund;
3. Providing short-term construction employment within City; and
4. Providing housing which will help to satisfy City's obligation to meet
City's share of regional housing needs, in particular the need for active
senior housing.
G. For the reasons recited herein, City has determined that the Project is a
development for which a development agreement is appropriate under the Development
Agreement Statute.
H. The Council has determined that this Agreement is consistent with the General
Pl,~m and specifically has determined that this Agreement is fair, just and reasonable, and City
has concluded that the economic interests of its citizens and the public health, safety and welfare
will be best served by entering into this Agreement.
I. In light of the benefits to the City as a result of the development of the Project,
City has agreed to enter into this Agreement to modify the parking standards that would
otherwise be applied to the Project. The purpose of the modified parking standards is to
recognize the unique parking needs of a senior housing project, as more fully explained in the
Parking Analysis, dated September 17, 2002, prepared by KSL RC, supported by a Parking
Analysis prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan dated July 1, 2002.
J. The Planning Commission of City (the "Planning Commission") held duly noticed
public hearings on this Agreement on October 23, 2002. Following the close of the public
heating, the Planning commission adopted Resolution No. 02-103 recommending approval of
the Agreement to the City Council with conditions.
K. The Council, after a duly noticed hearing, adopted Ordinance No. __,
approving this Agreement, which ordinance will become effective on (the
"Effective Date").
NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the
mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings defined for
such terms in the Sections set forth below:
Term Section
Applicable Rules Section III.B.1.
City Introduction
Council Recital D.
Declaration of Restrictions Section III.B.3. and Exhibit B.
Development Agreement Statute Recital B.
Duration of the Project Section III.B.3.
Effective Date Recital K.
Future Approvals Section III.C.
Mortgagee Section V.C.
Notice of Non-Compliance Section V.F.
2
710481.4
Owner Introduction
Project ~ Recital F.
Project Approvals Recital E.
Property Recital C. and Exhibit A.
Related Parties Section VI.J.
Required Parking Ratio Section m.B.2.
Subsequent Rules Section III.B.4.
Parcel Map Recital E.
Term Section V.K.
Vested Rights Section III.H.
SECTION Il. BENEFITS TO CITY. In consideration of the benefits resulting from this
Project, including, but not limited to, the provision of active senior housing opportunities for the
Duration of the Project, as such term is defined in Section III (B)(3), and the benefit to the
community that the development of the Project represents, all of which will provide a significant
overall benefit to City, City has agreed to enter into this Agreement.
SECTION III. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT.
A. Permitted Uses. The parties hereby agree that, for the term of this Agreement, ~he
permitted uses, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed
buildings, provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, the location of
public improvements, and the required amount of off-street vehicular parking spaces for the
project, shall be those set forth in this Agreement, the Project Approvals and the "Applicable
Rules" (as hereinafter defined).
B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies.
1. Applicable Rules. The parties hereby agree that, for the term of this
Agreement, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, .governing
density, and governing design, improvement and specifications applicable to development of the
Property, shall be those rules, regulations and official policies in rome at the time of the Effective
Date, except as modified by this Agreement, including, without limitation, the Project Approvals
(collectively, the "Applicable Rules"). Prior to the Effective Date, City and Owner shall use
reasonable efforts to identify two identical sets of the Applicable Rules, one set for City and one
set for Owner, so that if it becomes necessary in the future to refer to any of the Applicable
Rules, there will be a common set of the Applicable Rules available to both parties.
2. Required Parking Ratio for Proiect. Notwithstanding any rule, regulation
or official policy of the City to the contrary, the amount of required off-street vehicular parking
spaces for development of the Project shall be the ratio of 1.15 parking spaces for each dwelling
unit in the Project (the "Required Parking Ratio.") The Required Parking Ratio shall include all
required resident, guest and employee parking spaces. The Required Parking ratio applied to the
total number of dwelling units (264 units) for the Project equals 303.6 parking spaces which shall
be rounded up to require a minimum of 304 off-street parking spaces. Of the 304 off-street
parking spaces required, not less than 132 of those spaces shall be provided in individual "private
3
garages," and not less than 132 of those spaces shall be provided in "carports," as ~uch terms are
defined in Section 17.02.140 (C) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
3. Age Restriction; Declaration of Restrictions. In accordance with the
Project Approvals, the Project shall be a senior housing project by which the Owner agrees and
covenants that, with the exception of the Resident Manager, at least one resident in each housing
unit in the Project shall be at least 55 years of age and that each other resident in the same
dwelling unit shall be a qualified permanent resident (as defined in Civil Code Section 51.3), a
permitted health care resident (as defined in Civil Code Section 51.3), or a person under 55 years
of age whose occupancy is permitted under subdivision (h) of Civil Code Section 51.3 or under
subdivision (b) of Civil Code Section 51.4. In order to ensure that this restriction continues for
the Duration of the Project, as such term is defined in this subsection, and beyond the expiration
of this Agreement, a declaration of restrictions in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (the
"Declaration of Restrictions") shall be executed by the Owner and recorded against the Property
which shall remain in effect for the Duration of the Project or until released with the written
approval of the City. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Duration of the Project" shall
mean the period of time from the commencement of construction of the Project until the point in
time that is the earlier of either: (i) the complete demolition of the Project; or (ii) the City's
approval ora changein use from a senior housing project to some other use of the Property.
4. Conflicting Enactments with Respect to Parking. Any change in the
amount of required off-street vehicular parking for the Project, including, without limitation, any
change in any applicable general, community plan, area or specific plan, zoning, subdivision rule
or regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, including, without
limitation, any such change by means of an ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or
moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the Council, the
Planning Commission or any other board, agency, commission or department of City, or any
officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this
Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Property and which would conflict in any way with or
be more restrictive than the Required Parking Ratio ("Subsequent Rules"), shall not be applied
by City to the Property. Owner may give City written notice of its election to have any
Subsequent Rule applied to the Property, in which case such Subsequent Rule shall be deemed to
be an Applicable Rule.
C. Future Approvals. Any development Of the'Property shall require all
discretionary approvals required by the Applicable Rules (collectively, the "Future Approvals").
D. Permitted Conditions. Provided Owner's applications for any Future Approvals
are consistent with this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, City shall grant in a timely manner
the Future Approvals in accordance with the Applicable Rules.
E. Term of Map{s) and Other Project Approvals. Pursuant to California Government
Code Sections 66452.6(a) and 65863.5, the term of any subdivision or parcel map that may be
processed on all or any portion of the Property and the term of each of the Project Approvals
shall be extended for a period of time through the scheduled termination date of this Agreement
as set forth in Section V.K below.
F. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in
Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties
therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later-adopted initiative restricting
the timing of development to prevail over the parties' agreement, it is the parties' intent to cure .
that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that Owner shall have the right (without
obligation) to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and at such times as Owner
deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment.
G. Moratorium. No City-imposed moratorium or other limitation relating to the
required amount of off-street vehicular parking for development of the Property, whether
imposed by ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or otherwise, and whether enacted by
the Council, an agency of City, the electorate, or otherwise affecting parcel or subdivision maps
(whether tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy certificates or other
entitlements to use or service (including, without limitation, water and sewer) approved, issued
or granted within City, or portions of City, shall apply to the Property to the extent such
moratorium or limitation on parking is in conflict with Required Parking Ratio set forth in this
Agreement; provided, however, the provisions of this Section shall not affect City's compliance
with moratoria or other limitations mandated by other governmental agencies or court-imposed
moratoria or other limitations.
H. Vesting of Owner's Rights. The rights and entitlements granted to Owner
pursuant to this Agreement shall be and constitute "vested rights" or the equivalent of "vested
rights," as that term is defined under California law applicable to the development of land or
property and the right ora public entity to regulate or control such development of land or
property, with respect to the ability of Owner to construct the Project in compliance with the
Required Parking Ratio set forth in this Agreement.
I. Development AgreemenffProiect Approvals. In the event of any inconsistency
be~veen any Project Approval and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall
control.
SECTION IV. COOPERATION/IMPLEMENTATION.
A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents. Each party shall take all
actions and do all things, and execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit, if required, any and all
documents and writings, that may be necessary or proper to achieve the purposes and objectives
of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the execution and recordation of the Declaration
of Restrictions that restricts the use of the project for seniors for the Duration of the Project.
B. Processing During Third Party Litigation. The filing of any third party lawsuit(s)
against City or Owner relating to this Agreement, the Project Approvals or to other development
issues affecting the Property shall not delay or stop the development, processing or construction
of the Project, approval of the Future Approvals, or issuance of"Ministerial Approvals" (as
hereinafter defined), unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. City
shall not stipulate to the issuance of any such order. For purposes of this Agreement the term
"Ministerial Approvals" shall be defined to mean approvals requiring the determination of
conformance with the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, site plans, design review,
5
710481.4
development plans, land use plans, grading plans, improvement plans, building plans and
specifications, and ministerial issuance of one or more final maps, zoning clearances, grading
permits, improvement permits, wall permits, building permits, lot line adjustments,
encroachment permits, conditional and temporary use permits, certificates of use and occupancy
and approvals and entitlements and related matters as may be necessary for the completion of the
development of the Property.
C. State, Federal or Case Law. Where any state, federal or case law allows City to
exercise any discretion or take any act with respect to that law, City shall, in an expeditious and
timely manner, at the earliest possible time, (a) exercise its discretion in such a way as to be
cnnsistent with, and carry out the terms of, this Agreement and (b) take such other actions as
may be necessary to carry out in good faith the terms of this Agreement.
D. Other Governmental Bodies. To the extent that City, the Council, Planning
Commission or any other City agency constitutes and sits as any other board or agency, it shall
not take any action that conflicts with City's obligations under this Agreement.
E. Defense of Agreement.
1. Owner shall defend at its sole expense any lawsuit, claim or action
brought against City, its agents, officers, or employees, arising out of the approval, execution or
implementation of this Agreement. The Owner shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or
employees may be required to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not
relieve applicant of his obligations under this subparagraph.
2. Without limiting the terms and conditions of subparagraph (IV)(E)(1)
above, City shall take all actions which are necessary or advisable to uphold the validity and
enforceability of this Agreement. If this Agreement is adjudicated or determined to be invalid or
unenforceable, City agrees, subject to all legal requirements, to consider modifications to this
Agreement to render it valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by applicable law.
SECTION V. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Covenants Run with the Land. All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers,
standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon
the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, reorganization, consolidation or
otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons
acquiring the Property, or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of
law or in any manner whatsoever, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective
heirs, successors and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants
running with the land.
6
B. Transfers and Assignments.
1. RigJ~t to Assi~y~. Owner shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer all
or portions of the real property comprising the Property to any person at any time during the term
of this Agreement.
2. Liabilities Upon Transfer. Upon the delegation of all duties and
obligations and the sale, transfer or assignment of all or any portion of the Property, Owner shall
be released from its obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Property, or portion
thereof, so transferred arising subsequent to the effective date of such transfer if(i) Owner has
provided to City ten days' written notice of such transfer and (ii) the transferee has agreed in
writing to be subject to all of the provisions hereof applicable tothe portion of the Property so
transferred. Upon any transfer of any portion of the Property and the express assumption of
Owner's obligations under this Agreement by such transferee, City agrees to look solely to the
transferee for compliance by such transferee with the provisions of this Agreement as such
provisions relate to the portion of the Property acquired by such transferee. A default by any
transferee shall only affect that portion of the Property owned by such transferee and shall not
cancel or diminish in any way Owner's rights hereunder with respect to any portion of the
Property not owned by such transferee. The transferee shall be responsible for the reporting and
annual review requirements relating to the portion of the Property owned by such transferee, and
any amendment to this Agreement between City and a transferee shall only affect the portion of
the Property owned by such transferee.
C. Mortgagee Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not
prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the
Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or
other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that the
lender(s) providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and
modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Owner and
representatives of such lender(s) to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or
modification. City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested
interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the
intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any mortgagee of a mortgage or a beneficiary of a deed
of trust ("Mortgagee") of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges:
1. Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall
defeat; render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust on the
Property made in good faith and for value.
2. Any Mortgagee may give notice to city in writing that it holds a mortgage
in the Property and may request copies of any notice of default given to Owner under the terms
of this Agreement to be sent to that Mortgagee. Any such notice shall include the address to
which the Mortgagee desires copies of notices to be mailed. If City timely receives a request
from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to Owner under the terms of
this Agreement, City shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten days of
sending the notice of default to Owner. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this
710481.4 7 fg7
Agreement, and City shall accept such cure by or at the instance of the Mortgagee as if the same
had been made by the Owner.
3. Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part
thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such
foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement;
provided, however, in no event shall such Mortgagee be liable for any monetary obligations of
Owner arising prior to acquisition of title to the Property by such Mortgagee, except that any '
such Mortgagee or its successors or assigns shall not be entitled to a building permit or
occupancy certificate until all delinquent and current fees and other monetary obligations due
under this Agreement for the Property, or portion thereof, acquired by such Mortgagee have been
paid to City.
D. Statement of Compliance. Within thirty days following any written request which
either City or Owner may make from time to time, the other shall execute and deliver to the
requesting party a statement certifying that to the City's/Agency's knowledge: (1) this
Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect or, if there have been modifications hereto,
that this Agreement is in full force and effect, as modified, and stating the date and nature of
such modifications; (2) there are no current uncured defaults under this Agreement or specifying
the dates and nature of any such defaults; and (3) any other reasonable .information requested.
The failure to deliver such statement within such time shall be conclusive upon the party which
fails to deliver such statement that this Agreement is in full force and effect without modification
and that there are no uncured defaults in the performance of the requesting party. The City
Manager shall be authorized to execute any such statement. ,.
E. Default. Failure by City or Owner to perform any term or provision of this
Agreement for a period of thirty days from the receipt of written notice thereof from the other
shall constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to extensions of time by mutual consent
in writing. Said notice shall specify in detail the nature of the alleged default and the manner in
which said default may be satisfactorily cured. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it
cannot reasonably be cured within such 30-day period, the commencement of the cure within
such time period and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure shall be deemed a cure
within such period.
Subject to the foregoing, after notice and expiration of the 30-day period without
cure, the notifying party, at its option, may institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement
and/or give notice of intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section
65868. Following such notice of intent to terminate, the matter shall be scheduled for
consideration and review by the Council within thirty calendar days in the manner set forth in
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Following consideration of the evidence
presented in said review before the Council and a determination that a default exists, the party
alleging the default by the other party may give written notice of termination of this Agreement
to the other party.
F. Annual Review.
710481.4 8
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1, throughout the term of
this Agreement, good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement by Owner shall be
reviewed by the Planning Commission at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting
next following each annual anniversary of the Effective Date. If as a result of such review, City
rea~sonably determines, on the basis of substantial evidence presented at such meeting, that
Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions hereof, City shall provide
written notice thereof ("Notice of Non-Compliance"), stating in specific detail and specific
reasons for such finding. After City delivers the Notice of Non-Compliance, Owner shall have
the right to cure such non-compliance as provided in Section v.E. above. In the event that Owner
does not timely cure the non-compliance after a Notice of Non-Compliance is delivered by City
or, if during the period which Owner must cure such default, Owner ceases to make reasonable
effi)rts to effect such cure, City may proceed to terminate this Agreement on ten days' prior
written notice to Owner in accordance with the termination procedure set forth in Section v.E.
above.
2. In addition to the provisions of subparagraph (V)(F)(1) above, and without
limitation thereto, on or before March 15 of each year during the Term following
commencement of the Project, the Owner, or its representative, shall file a report of continuing
program compliance with the City. Each such report shall contain information as City may
reasonably require including, but not limited to a project occupancy profile, including the age Of
all occupants.
In addition, for purposes of assessing the needs of the residents of future similar senior housing
developments, City may (a) in any one such report, require Owner to include the results of an on-
site parking count survey conducted over a two-day period, including a Saturday, between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. of each such day in the two-day period, and/or (b) conduct its
own annual survey of the residents in the Project.
G. Default by City. In the event City defaults (as defined in Section V.E. heroin)
under the terms of this Agreement, Owner shall have all rights and remedies provided herein or
under applicable law, including the specific performance of this Agreement.
H. Legal Action. Any party may, in addition to any other rights or remedies,
institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, enfome any covenant or agreement
herein, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforce by specific performance
the obligations and rights of the parties hereto.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 638, et seq., all legal actions shall be
heard by a referee who shall be a retired judge from either the San Bemardino County Superior
Court, the California Court of Appeal, the United States District Court or the United States Court
of Appeals, provided that the selected referee shall have experience in resolving land use and real
property disputes. Owner and City shall agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues,
whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon and issue all legal and
equitable relief appropriate under the cimumstances of the controversy before such referee. If
Owner and City are unable to agree on a referee within ten days of a written request to do so by
either party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall initially be borne equally by the
9
parties. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section V.H. shall be considered a temporary judge
appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution.
1. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by City or Owner to insist upon the strict
performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement, irrespective of the length of time for
which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of the right to demand strict
compliance with this Agreement in the future. No waiver by City or Owner of a default or
breach of any other party shall be effective or binding upon it unless made in writing, and no
such waiver shall be implied from any omission by City or Owner to take any action with respect
to such default or breach. No express written waiver of any defaults or breach shall affect any
other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or
period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers ora default or
breach under any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any subsequent default or
breach, and the performance of the same or any other term or provision contained in this
Agreement. Subject to notice of default and opportunity to cure under Section V.E., all of the
remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, at law or in equity, shall be cumulative
and altemative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or
election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right or remedy.
J. Future Litigation Expenses.
1. Payment to Prevailing Party. If City or Owner brings an action or
proceeding (including, without limitation, any motion, order to show cause, cross-complaint,
counterclaim, or third-party claim) by reason of defaults, breaches, tortious acts, or otherwise
arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled
to its costs and expenses of suit including, but not limited.to, reasonable attorneys' fees and
expert witness fees.
2. Scope of Fees. Attorneys' fees under this Section shall include attomeys'
fees on any appeal and, in addition, a party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other
reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action. In addition to the
foregoing award of attorneys' fees to the prevailing party, the prevailing party in any lawsuit
shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees incurred in any post-judgment proceedings to collect or
enforce the judgment. This provision is separate and several and shall survive the merger of this
Agreement into any judgment on this Agreement.
K. Term. Unless the "Term" (as hereinafter defined) of this Agreement is otherwise
tearninated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by mutual
consent of the parties, the duration of this Development Agreement (the "Term") shall be the
longer of either of the following: (i) five (5) years; or (ii) the expiration of the Project Approvals.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if construction of the Project is commenced within the Term, and
then before the Term of this Agreement would otherwise expire, the Project is thereafter
destroyed by fire, other calamity, by an act of God, or by the public enemy, the Project may be
restored and the previously authorized uses completed, provided that restoration is started within
one year thereafter and diligently pursued to completion.
10
L. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws.
1. Permitted Delays. In addition to any specific provisions of this
Agreement, performance of obligations hereunder shall be excused and the Term of this
Agreement shall be similarly extended during any period of delay caused at any time by reason
of: acts of God such as floods, earthquakes, fires, or similar catastrophes; wars, riots or similar
hostilities; strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control (including the party's
employment force); the enactment of new laws or restrictions imposed or mandated by other
governmental or quasi-governmental entities preventing this Agreement from being
implemented; litigation involving this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Future Approvals
or the Ministerial Approvals, which directly or indirectly delays any activity contemplated
hereunder, delay in the issuance of bonds or formation of the CFD or other Financing .
Mechanism; or other causes beyond the party's control. City and Owner shall promptly notify
the other party of any delay hereunder as soon as possible after the same has been ascertained.
2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws. If any federal or state law, made or
enacted after the Effective Date prevents or precludes compliance with one or more provisions of,
this Agreement, then the provisions of this Agreement shall, to the extent feasible, be modified
or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such new law. Immediately after enactment or
promulgation of any such new law, City and Owner shall meet and confer in good faith to
determine the feasibility of any such modification or suspension based on the effect such
modification or suspension would have on the purposes and intent of this Agreement. Owner
and/or City shall have the right to challenge the new law preventing compliance with the terms
of this Agreement, and in the event such challenge is successful, this Agreement shall remain
unmodified and in full force and effect. At Owner's sole option, the term of this Agreement may
be extended for the duration of the period during which such new law precludes compliance with
the provisions of this Agreement.
M. Amendment ot'Agreement. This Agreement may be amended from time to time
by mutual consent of the parties to this Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868.
SECTIOIhl VI. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Negation of Partnership. The Project constitutes private development, neither
City nor Owner is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and City and Owner
are independent entities with respect to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. None of the
terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between or among
the parties-in the businesses of Owner, the affairs of City, or otherwise, nor shall it cause them to
be considered joint venturers or members of any joint enterprise.
B. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended, nor shall it be
construed, to create any third-party beneficiary rights in any person who is not a party, unless
expressly otherwise provided.
C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire
understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations,
ll
710481.4 - 1.~1
understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or
expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations,
understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to
interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement.
D. Severability. Invalidation of any of the provisions contained in this Agreement,
or of the application thereof to any person, by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any
of the other provisions hereof or the application thereof to any other person or circumstance, and
the same shall remain in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this Agreement, as so
invalidated, would be unreasonable or inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate
the purposes of this Agreement and the fights and obligations of the parties hereto.
E. Construction of Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement and the
Exhibits hereto shall be construed as a whole according to their common meaning and not
strictly for or against Owner or City and consistent with the provisions hereof, in order to
achieve the objectives and purposes. Wherever required by the context, the singular shall
include the plural and vice versa, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine or neuter
genders, or vice versa.
F. Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for
convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
G. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.
H. Notices. Any notice shall be in writing and given by delivering the same in
person or by sending the same by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, with
postage prepaid, by overnight delivery, or by facsimile to the respective mailing addresses, as
follows:
City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive,
Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Attention: City Manager
Facsimile: (909) 477-2849
Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon
Attorneys at Law
Number One Civic Center Circle
P. O. Box 1059
Brea, CA 92822-1059
Attention: James L. Markman, Esq.
Facsimile: (714) 990-6230
Owner: KSL RC, L.P.
5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92008
12
71(1481.4
Attention: Anthony A. Ferrero
Facsimile: (760) 804-5909
Copy to: Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLP
222 Kearny Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Attention: Harry O'Brien, Esq.
Facsimile: (415) 989-1663
Either City or Owner may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such
change to the other in the manner provided herein at least ten days prior to the date such change
is effected. All notices under this Agreement shall be deemed given, received, made or
communicated on the earlier of the date personal delivery is effected or on the delivery dat~ or
attempted delivery date shown on the return receipt, air bill or facsimile.
I. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and of each and
ew~ry term and condition hereof.
J. Limitation of Liability. City hereby acknowledges and agrees that Owner's
obligations under this Agreement are solely those ofKSL RC, L.P. and in no event shall any
present, past or future officer, director, shareholder, employee, partner, affiliate, manager,
representative or agent of Owner ("Related'Parties") have any pemonal liability, directly or
indirectly, under this Agreement and recourse shall not be available against Owner or any
Related Party in connection with this Agreement or any other document or instrument heretofore
or hereafter executed in connection with this Agreement. The limitations of liability provided in
this Section are in addition to, and not in limitation of, any limitation on liability applicable to
Owner or any Related Party provided by law or in any other contract, agreement or instrument.
K. .Recordation. In order to comply with Section 65868.5 of the Government Code,
the parties do hereby direct the City Clerk to record a copy of this Agreement against the
Property with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County within ten (10) days after the
Effective Date.
13
710481.4
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and City have executed this Agreement as of the date
fin;t hereinabove written.
"City"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
By:
City Attorney
KSL RC, L.P.,
a Califomia limited liability partnership
"General Partner"
By:
Name:
Title:
14
710481.4 ~/q~t~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
On ,2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said County and State, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the within
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD[NO )
On ,2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said County and State, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the ~ithin
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
710481.4 15 .~_~7 q~
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
A-I
EXHIBIT "B"
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO'.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
REGARDING SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT
This Declaration &Restrictions (the "Declaration") is executed as of
., 2002, by KSL RC, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Owner").
RECITALS
A. Owner is the owner of certain real property generally located near the southwest
corner of Sixth Street and Fairway View Lane in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as
more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property").
B. Owner submitted an application for development of a senior housing apartment
complex containing approximately two hundred sixty-four (264) dwelling units for senior
citizens (the "Project'). In order for Owner to satisfy certain requirements &the Development
Agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Owner on
date, Owner desires to impose certain restrictions on the Property.
C. The City &Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (the "City"), is intended
to be a third party beneficiary of this Declaration, such that consent of the City in a form to be
recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino, shall be required for the
modification of revocation of the restrictions imposed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, Owner hereby declares and agrees as follows.
1. Occupancy Restrictions. In accordance with the Project Approvals, the Project
shall be a senior housing project by which, with the exception &the Resident Manager, at least
one resident in each housing unit in the Project shall be at least 55 years of age and each other
resident in the same dwelling unit shall be a qualified permanent resident (as defined in Civil
Code Section 51.3), a permitted health care resident (as defined in Civil Code Section 51.3), or a
person under 55 years &age whose occupancy is permitted under subdivision (h) &Civil Code
Section 51.3 or under subdivision (b) of Civil Code Section 51.4.
710481.4 B-I '/'q7
2. Term. This Declaration and the restrictions against the Property contained herein
shall automatically terminate and cease to affect the Property upon the earlier of(i) the complete
demolition of the Project, or (ii) approval of the City pursuant to the Code of a change in use
from a senior housing project operated in accordance with the occupancy restrictions set forth in
Section 1 of this Declaration to some other use of the Property. Upon notice of the occurrence of
such event, the City Planner of City or his designee shall execute and record a document
confirming the termination of this Declaration. Subject to the foregoing, the Property shall
hereafter be held, transferred, sold, leased, conveyed and occupied subject to the restrictions,
covenants, and obligations set forth herein.
3. Modification, Revocation or Termination. This Declaration has been recorded in
order to satisfy the requirements of the Development Agreement and to obtain the approval by
the City of certain permits for the Project. The restrictions created herein may not be modified,
revoked or terminated, except as provided in Section 2, without the written consent of the then
record owner of the Property, and any such modification, revocation or termination shall not he
effective unless and until the City consents thereto in writing after receiving written notice
thereof from the then record owners of the Property, and such modification, revocation or
termination, executed by the City Planner of City, is recorded in the Official Records of the
County of San Bemardino.
4. Third Party Beneficiary. The City is intended to be a third party beneficiary of-
this Declaration, with the right to consent to any modification or revocation hereof and the right
and authority, at its sole option, to enforce the provisions hereof(including, but not limited to
remedies for violation of a building permit); provided, however, that the City shall have no
liability whatsoever hereunder with respect to the condition of the Property.
5. Dedication. Nothing contained in this Declaration shall be deemed a gift or
dedication of any portion of the Property to the general public or for the general public or for any
public purpose whatsoever. It is the intention of Owner that this Declaration shall be strictly
limited to and for the purposes expressed herein.
6. Successors. The restrictions contained herein shall mn with the land and
automatically, and without further action by Owner bind and inure to the benefit of the heirs,
assigns, personal representatives, transferees and successors of Owner.
7. Governing Law. This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
8. Severability. The invalidity or unenfomeability of any provision of this
Declaration with respect to a particular party orset of circumstances shall not in any way affect
the validity Or enforceability of any other provision hereof, or the same provision when applied
to another party or a different set of cireumstances.
9. Authority. The persons executing this Declaration on behalf of Owner do hereby
covenant and warrant that Owner is a duly authorized and existing limited parmership, and that
Owner has and is qualified to do business in California, that Owner has full right and authority to
enter into this Declaration, and the persons signing on behalf of Owner are authorized to do so.
B-2
10. Counterparts. This Declaration may be executed in counterparts, each of which '
shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same
Declaration.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner executed this instrument effective as of the day and
year first above written, and City has accepted this Declaration.
RSL RC, L.P.
a California limited partnership
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
APPROVED:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Mayor
ATTEST
City Clerk
B-3
710481.4
ORDINANCE NO. ~'~'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. DRC2002-00643, TO ESTABLISH A UNIQUE
PARKING RATIO FOR A PROPOSED SENIOR APARTMENT PROJECT
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND
MAYTEN DRIVE, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AS
PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-151-70.
A. Recitals.
(i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a
waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and
discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make
maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project, that upon approval of the
project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules
and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning
process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic
costs of development."
(ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal
or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this
article..."
(iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows:
"A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the
permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes.
The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and
requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses
and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..."
(iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference is proposed Development Agreement DRC2002-00643, concerning that property
located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Mayten Avenue, and as legally described
in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the Development
Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement."
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2002-00643 - FOUNTAIN GLEN PROPERTIES
November 6, 2002
Page 2
(v) On October 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said
hearing on that date and recommended approval with conditions through the adoption of its
Resolution No. 02-100.
(vi) On November 6, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing concerning the request.
(vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Initial
Study Parts I and II, the Development Agreement, and certified the Negative Declaration in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder.
SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-referenced
Public hearings on October 23 and November 6, 2002, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a) The location, design, and proposes uses set forth in this Development Agreement
are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity.
b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good
zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement.
SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2002-00643,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin,
a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY RECORDING FEES EXEMPT DUE TO
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383
PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90067 City Clerk
Attn: Lewis G. Feldman, Esq.
(Space Above Line For Recorder's Use Only)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................. 2
II. BENEFITS TO CITY ....................................................................................................... 3
III. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................... 3
A. Permitted Uses ......................................................................................................... 3
B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies ................................................................. 3
1. Applicable Rules ......................................................................................... 3
2. Required Parking Ratio for Project ............................................................. 3
3. Restrictive Covenant for Senior Housing .................................................... 3
4. Conflicting Enactments with Respect to Parking ........................................ 4
C. Future Approvals ..................................................................................................... 4
D. Permitted Conditions ............................................................................................... 4
E. Term of Map(s) and Other Project Approvals ........................................................ 4
F. Timing of Development .......................................................................................... 4
G. Moratorium .............................................................................................................. 5
H. Vesting of Owner's Rights ...................................................................................... 5
I. Development Agreement/Project Approvals .......................................................... 5
IV. COOPERATION/IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................... 5
A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents ........................ ~ ........................ 5
B. Processing During Third Party Litigation ............................................................... 5
C. State, Federal or Case Law ...................................................................................... 6
D. Other Governmental Bodies .................................................................................... 6
E. Defense of Agreement ............................................................................................. 6
F. Age Restriction ........................................................................................................ 6
V. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................... 6
A. Covenants Run with the Land ................................................................................. 6
B. Transfers and Assignments ......................... · ............................................................ 7
1. Right to Assign ............................................................................................ 7
2. Liabilities Upon Transfer ............................................................................ 7
C. Mortgagee Protection .............................................................................................. 7
D. Statement of Compliance ........................................................................................ 8
i
710655.2 2b3
E. Default ..................................................................................................................... 8
F. Annual Review ........................................................................................................ 9
G. Default by City ........................................................................................................ 9
H. Legal Action ............................................................................................................ 9
I. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative .............................................................................. 10
J. Future Litigation Expenses .................................................................................... 10
1. Payment to Prevailing Party ...................................................................... 10
2. Scope of Fees ............................................................................................ 10
3. Term ...................................................................................................................... 10
L. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws ........................................... 11
1. Permitted Delays ....................................................................................... 11
2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws ............................................................. 11
M. Amendment of Agreement .................................................................................... 11
VI. MISCELLANEOUS ................................................................ i ....................................... 11
A. Negation of Partnership ......................................................................................... 11
B. No Third Party Beneficiary ................................................................................... 12
C. Entire Agreement .................................................................................................. 12
D. Severability ............................................................................................................ 12
E. Construction of Agreement ................................................................................... 12
F. Section Headings ................................................................................................... 12
G. Applicable Law ..................................................................................................... 12
H. Notices ................................................................................................................... 12
I. Time is of the Essence ........................................................................................... 13
J. Limitation of Liability ........................................................................................... 13
K. Recordation ........................................................................................................... 13
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES, LP
TH/S DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of
this day of ,2002, by and between the C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
municipal corporation and general law city ("City"), and FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES, LP,
a Delaware limited pannership ("Owner").
WITNESSETH:
A. The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste
of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development, and discourage investment in
and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of
re,sources at the least economic cost to the public.
B. California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5 (the "Development
Agreement Statute") were therefore enacted authorizing a municipality to enter into binding
development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property.
C. Owner has a legal or equitable interest in certain real property located in City
more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property").
D. On ,2002, the City Council (the "Council"), after making appropriate
findings, approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the p~ovisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
E. Concurrently with adoption of the Ordinance approving this Agreement, the City
has approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 15923 with Conditions of Approval ("Parcel Map"), and
Development Plan Review No. DRC2002-00633 ("Development Review"). This Agreement, the
Parcel Map and the Development Review shall constitute the "Project Approvals."
F. Development of the Project into a 216 unit senior residential community,
including associated amenities (the "Project"), will further the comprehensive planning
objectives contained within City's General Plan, as amended, and will result in public benefits,
including, among others, the following:
1. Fulfilling long-term economic and social goals for City and the
community;
2. Providing fiscal benefits to City's General Fund;
3. Providing short-term construction employment within City; and
4. Providing housing which will help to satisfy City's obligation to meet
City's share of regional housing needs, in particular the need for active
senior housing.
G. For the reasons recited herein, City has determined that the Project is a
development for which a development agreement is appropriate under the Development
Agreement Statute.
H. The Council has determined that this Agreement is consistent with the General
Plan and specifically has determined that this Agreement is fair, just and reasonable, and City
has concluded that the economic interests of its citizens and the public health, safety and welfare
will be best served by entering into this Agreement.
I. In light of the benefits to the City as a result of the development of the Project,
City has agreed to enter into this Agreement to modify the parking standards that would
otherwise be applied to the Project. The purpose of the modified parking standards is to
recognize the unique parking needs of a senior housing project, as more fully explained in the
Parking Analysis, dated June 12, 2002, prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers.
J. The Planning Commission of City (the "Planning Commission") held duly noticed
public hearings on this Agreement on October 23, 2002. Following the close of the public
heating, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 02-100, recommending approval of
the Agreement to the City Council with conditions.'
K. The Council, after a duly noticed hearing, adopted Ordinance No.
approving this Agreement, which ordinance will become effective on (the
"Effective Date").
NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the
mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION !. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings defined for
such terms in the Sections set forth below:
Term Section
Applicable Rules Section III.B. 1.
City Introduction
Council Recital D.
Declaration of Restrictions Section III.B.3. and Exhibit B.
Development Agreement Statute Recital B.
Duration of the Project Section III.B.3.
Effective Date Recital K.
Future Approvals Section III.C.
Mortgagee Section V.C.
Notice of Non-Compliance Section V.F.
Owner Introduction
Project Recital F.
Project Approvals Recital E.
Property Recital C. and Exhibit A.
Related Parties Section VI.J.
2
Required Parking Ratio Section III.B.2.
Subsequent Rules Section II1.B.4.
Parcel Map Recital E.
Term Section V.K.
Vested Rights Section III.H.
SECTION II. BENEFITS TO CITY. In consideration of the benefits resulting from this
Project, including, but not limited to, the provision of active senior housing opportunities for the
Duration of the Project, as such term is defined in Section III (B)(3), and the benefit to the
community that the development of the Project represents, all of which will provide a significant
overall benefit to City, City has agreed to enter into this Agreement.
SECTION III. PRO~ECT DEVELOPMENT.
A. Permitted Uses. The parties hereby agree that, for the term of this Agreement, the
permitted uses, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed
buildings, provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, the location of
public improvements, and the required amount of off-street vehicular parking spaces for the
project, shall be those set forth in this Agreement, the Project Approvals and the "Applicable
Rules" (as hereinafter defined).
B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies.
1. Applicable Rules. The parties hereby agree that, for the term of this
Agreement, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, governing
density, and governing design, improvement and specifications applicable to development of the
Property, shall be those rules, regulations and official policies in force at the time of the Effective
Date, except as modified by this Agreement, including, without limitation, the Project Approvals
(collectively, the "Applicable Rules"). Prior to the Effective Date, City and Owner shall use
reasonable efforts to identify two identical sets of the Applicable Rules, one set for City and one
set for Owner, so that if it becomes necessary in the future to refer to any of the Applicable
Rules, there will be a common set of the Applicable Rules available to both parties.
2. Required Parking Ratio for Proiect. Notwithstanding any rule, regulation
or official policy of the City to the contrary, the amount of required off-street vehicular parking
spaces for development of the Project shall be the ratio of 1.15 parking spaces for each dwelling
unit in the Project (the "Required Parking Ratio.") The Required Parking Ratio shall include all
required resident, guest and employee parking spaces. The Required Parking Ratio applied to
the total number of dwelling units (216 units) for the Project equals 248.4 parking spaces which
shall be rounded up to require a minimum of 249 off-street parking spaces. Of the 249 off-street
parking spaces required, not less than 108 of those spaces shall be provided in individual "private
garages," and not less than 108 of those spaces shall be provided in "carports," as such terms are
defined in Section 17.02.140 (C) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
3. Restrictive Covenant for Senior Housing. In accordance with the Project
Approvals, the Project shall be a senior housing project by which the Owner agrees and
covenants that, with the exception of the employees of Owner, at least one resident in each
housing unit in the Project shall be at least 55 years of age and that each other resident in the
same dwelling unit, if any, shall be a qualified permanent resident, a permitted health cam
resident, or a person under 55 years of age whose occupancy is permitted under subdivision (h)
of Civil Code Section 51.3 or under subdivision (b) of Civil Code Section 51.4. In order to
ensure that this restriction continues for the Duration of the Project, as such term is defined in
this subsection, and beyond the expiration of this Agreement, a declaration of restrictions in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Declaration of Restrictions") shall be executed by the
Owner and recorded against the Property which shall remain in effect for the Duration of the
Project or until released with the written approval of the City. For purposes of this Agreement,
the term "Duration of the Project" shall mean the period of time from the commencement of
construction of the Project until the point in time that is the earlier of either: (i) the complete
demolition of the Project; or (ii) the City's approval of a change in use from a senior housing
project to some other use of the Property.
4. Conflicting Enactments with Respect to Parking. Any change in the
amount of required off-street vehicular parking for the Project, including, without limitation, any
change in any applicable general, community plan, area or specific plan, zoning, subdivision role
or regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, including, without
limitation, any such change by means of an ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or
moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the Council, the
Planning Commission or any other board, agency, commission or department of City, or any
officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this
Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Property and which would conflict in any way with or
be more restrictive than the Required Parking Ratio ("Subsequent Rules")~ shall not be applied
by City to the Property. Owner may give City writien notice of its election to have any
Subsequent Rule applied to the Property, in which case such Subsequent Rule shall be deemed to
be an Applicable Rule.
C. Future Approvals. Any development of the Property shall require all
discretionary approvals required by the Applicable Rules (collectively, the "Future Approvals").
D. Permitted Conditions. Provided Owner's applications for any Future Approvals
are consistent with this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, City shall grant in a timely manner
the Future Approvals in accordance with the Applicable Rules.
E. Term of Map(s) and Other Project Approvals. Pursuant to California Government
Code Sections 66452.6(a) and 65863.9, the term of any subdivision or parcel map that may be
processed on all or any portion of the Property and the term of each of the Project Approvals
shall be extended for a period of time through the scheduled termination date of this Agreement
as set forth in Section v.K below.
F. Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in
Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties
therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later-adopted initiative restricting
the timing of development to prevail over the parties' agreement, it is the parties' intent to cure
that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that Owner shall have the right (without
obligation) to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and at such times as Owner
deems appropriate wilhin the exercise of its subjective business judgment.
G. Moratorium. No City-imposed moratorium or other limitation relating to the
required amount of off-street vehicular parking for development of the Property, whether
imposed by ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or otherwise, and whether enacted by
the Council, an agency of City, the electorate, or otherwise affecting parcel or subdivision maps
(whether tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy certificates or other
entitlements to use or service (including, without limitation, water and sewer) approved, issued
or granted within City, or portions of City, shall apply to the Property to the extent such
moratorium or limitation on parking is in conflict with Required Parking Ratio set forth in this
Agreement; provided, however, the provisions of this Section shall not affect City's compliance
with moratoria or other limitations mandated by other governmental agencies or court-imposed
moratoria or other limitations.
H. Vesting of Owner's Rights. The rights and entitlements granted to Owner
pursuant to this Agreement shall be and constitute "vested rights" or the equivalent of "vested
rights", as that term is defined under California law applicable to the development of land or
property and the right of a public entity to regulate or control such development of land or
property, with respect to the ability of Owner to construct the Project in compliance with the
Required Parking Ratio set forth in this Agreement.
I. Development AgreemenffProiect Approvals. In the event of any inconsistency
between any Project Approval and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall ·
control.
SECTION IV. COOPERATION/IMPLEMENTATION.
A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents. Each party shall take all
actions and do all things, and execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit, if required, any and all
documents and writings, that may be necessary or proper to achieve the purposes and objectives
of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the execution and recordation of the Declaration
of Restrictions that restricts the use of the project for seniors for the Duration of the Project.
B. Processing During Third Party Litigation. The filing of any third party lawsuit(s)
against City or Owner relating to this Agreement, the Project Approvals or to other development
issues affecting the Property shall not delay or stop the development, processing or construction
of the Project, approval of the Future Approvals, or issuance of "Ministerial Approvals" (as
hereinafter defined), unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. City
shall not stipulate to the issuance of any such order. For purposes of this Agreement the term
"Ministerial Approvals" shall be defined to mean approvals requiring the determination of
conformance with the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, site plans, design review,
development plans, land use plans, grading plans, improvement plans, building plans and
specifications, and ministerial issuance of one or more final maps, zoning clearances, grading
permits, improvement permits, wall permits, building permits, lot line adjustments,
encroachment perrnils, conditional and temporary use permits, certificates of use and occupancy
and approvals and entitlements and related matters as may be necessary for the completion of the
development of the Property.
C. State, Federal or Case Law. Where any state, federal or case law allows City to
exercise any discretion or take any act with respect to that law, City shall, in an expeditious and
timely manner, at the earliest possible time, (a) exercise its discretion in such a way as to be
consistent with, and carry out the terms of, this Agreement and (b) take such other actions as
may be necessary to carry out in good faith the terms of this Agreement.
D. Other Governmental Bodies. To the extent that City, the Council, Planning
Commission or any other City agency constitutes and sits as any other board or agency, it shall
not take any action that conflicts with City's obligations under this Agreement.
E. Defense of Agreement.
1. Owner shall defend at its sole expense any lawsuit, claim or action
brought against City, its agents, officers, or employees, arising out of the approval, execution or
implementation of this Agreement. The Owner shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers or
employees may be required to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not
relieve applicant of his obligations under this subparagraph.
2. Without limiting the terms and conditions of subparagraph (IV)(E)(1)
above, City shall take all actions which are necessary or advisable to uphold the validity and
enforceability of this Agreement. If this Agreement is adjudicated or determined to be invalid or
unenforceable, City agrees, subject to all legal requirements, to consider modifications to this
Agreement to render it valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by applic:~ble law.
F. Age Restriction. Owner agrees and covenants that for the Duration of the Project,
and with the exception of the employees of Owner, at least one resident in each housing unit in
the Project shall be at least 55 years of age and that each other resident in the same dwelling unit,
if ally, shall be a qualified permanent resident, a permitted health care resident, or a person under
55 years of age whose occupancy is permitted under subdivision (h) of Civil Code Section 51.3
or under subdivision (b) of Civil Code Section 51.4. This requirement shall not be rescinded
without the written approval of the City and shall be reflected in the Declaration of Restrictions
which shall be executed by Owner, recorded against the Property, and shah remain in effect for
the iDuration of the Project or until released by the City.
SECTION V. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Covenants Run with the Land. All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers,
standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon
the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, reorganization, consolidation or
otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons
acquiring the Property, or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of
]aw or in any manner whatsoever, and shah inure to the benefit of thc parties and their respective
6
710655.2 ~ / ~
heirs, successors and assigns, All of the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants
running with the land.
B. Transfers and Assignments.
1. Right to Assign. Owner shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer all
or portions of the real property comprising the Property to any person at any time during the term
of this Agreement.
2. Liabilities Upon Transfer. Upon the delegation of all duties and
obligations and the sale, transfer or assignment of all or any portion of the Property, Owner shall
be released from its obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Property, or portion
thereof, so transferred arising subsequent to the effective date of such transfer if (i) Owner has
provided to City ten days' written notice of such transfer and (ii) the transferee has agreed in
writing to be subject to all of the provisions hereof applicable to the portion of the Property so
transferred. Upon any transfer of any portion of the Property and the express assumption of
Owner's obligations under this Agreement by such transferee, City agrees to look solely to the
transferee for compliance by such transferee with the provisions of this Agreement as such
provisions relate to the portion of the Property acquired by such transferee. A default by any
transferee shall only affect that portion of the Property owned by such transferee and shall not
cancel or diminish in any way Owner's rights hereunder with respect to any portion of the
Property not owned by such transferee. The transferee shall be responsible for the reporting and
annual review requirements relating to the portion of the Property owned by such transferee, and
any amendment to this Agreement between City and a transferee shall only affect the portion of
the Property owned by such transferee.
C. Mortgagee Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not
prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the
Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or
other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that the
lender(s) providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and
modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Owner and
representatives of such lender(s) to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or
modification. City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested
interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the
intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any mortgagee of a mortgage or a beneficiary of a deed
of trust ("Mortgagee") of the Property shah be entitled to the following rights and privileges:
1. Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall
defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust on the ·
Property made in good faith and for value.
2. Any Mortgagee may give notice to City in writing that it holds a mortgage
in the Property and may request copies of any notice of default given to Owner under the terms
of this Agreement to be sent to that Mortgagee. Any such notice shall include the address to
which the Mortgagee desires copies of notices to be mailed. If City timely receives a request
from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to Owner under the terms of
7
this Agreement, City shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten days of .
sending the notice of default to Owner. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the
obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this
Agreement, and City shall accept such cure by or at the instance of the Mortgagee as if the same
had been made by the Owner.
3. Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part
thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such
foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement;
provided, however, in no event shall such Mortgagee be liable for any monetary obligations of
Owner arising prior to acquisition of title to the Property by such Mortgagee, except that any
such Mortgagee or its successors or assigns shall not be entitled to a building permit or
occupancy certificate until all delinquent and current fees and other monetary obligations due
under this Agreement for the Property, or portion thereof, acquired by such Mortgagee have been
paid to City.
D. Statement of Compliance. Within thirty days followingany written request which
either City or Owner may make from time to time, the other shall execute and deliver to the
requesting party a statement certifying that to the City's/Agency's knowledge: (1) this
Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect or, if there have been modifications hereto,
that this Agreement is in full force and effect, as modified, and stating the date and nature of
such modifications; (2) there are no current uncured defaults under this Agreement or specifying
the dates and nature of any such defaults; and (3) any other reasonable information requested.
The failure to deliver such statement within such time shall be conclusive upon the party which
fails to deliver such statement that this Agreement is in full force and effect without modification
and that there are no uncured defaults in the performance of the requesting party. The City
Manager shall be authorized to execute any such statement.
E. Default. Failure by City or Owner to perform any term or provision of this
Agreement for a period of thirty days from the receipt of written notice thereof from the other
shall constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to extensions of time by mutual Consent
in writing. Said notice shall specify in detail the nature of the alleged default and the manner in
which said default may be satisfactorily cured. If the nature'of the alleged default is such that it
cannot reasonably be cured within such 30-day period, the commencement of the cure within
such time period and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure shall be deemed a cure
within such period.
Subject to the foregoing, after notice and expiration of the 30-day period without
- cure, the notifying party, at its option, may institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement
and/or give notice of intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section
65868. Following such notice of intent to terminate, the matter shall be scheduled for
consideration and review by the Council within thirty calendar days in the manner set forth in
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Following consideration of the evidence
presented in said review before the Council and a determination that a default exists, the party
alleging the default by the other party may give written notice of termination of this Agreement
to the other party.
F. Annual Review.
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1, throughout the term of
this Agreement, good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement by Owner shall be
reviewed by the Planning Commission at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting
next following each annual anniversary of the Effective Date. If as a result of such review, City
reasonably determines, on the basis of substantial evidence presented at such meeting, that
Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions hereof, City shall provide
written notice thereof ("Notice of Non-Compliance"), stating in specific detail and specific
reasons for such finding. After City delivers the Notice of Non-Compliance, Owner shall have
the right to cure such non-compliance as provided in Section v.E. above. In the event that Owner
does not timely cure the non-compliance after a Notice of Non-Compliance is delivered by City
or, if during the period which Owner must cure such default, Owner ceases to make reasonable
efforts to effect such cure, City may proceed to terminate this Agreement on ten days! prior
written notice to Owner in accordance with the termination procedure set forth in Section v.E.
above.
2. In addition to the provisions of subparagraph (V)(F)(1) above, and without
limitation thereto, on or before March 15 of each year following commencement of the Project,
the Owner, or its representative, shall file a report of continuing program compliance with the
City. Each such report shall contain information as City may require including, but not limited
to, the following:
a. a project occupancy profile, including the age of all occupants; and
b. an on-site parking count survey conducted over a two-day period,
including a Saturday, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. of each such day in the two-
day period.
In addition, City shall be allowed to conduct its own annual survey of the residents in the Project
for purposes of assessing the needs of the residents of the Project; however, the City's survey
shall be for informational purposes only and in no event shah the results of this survey affect the
terms of this Agreement.
G. Default by City. In the event City defaults (as defined in Section v.E. herein)
under the terms of this Agreement, Owner shall have all rights and remedies provided herein or
under applicable law, including the specific performance of this Agreement.
H. Legal Action. Any party may, in addition to any other rights or remedies,
institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, enforce any covenant or agreement
herein, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforce by specific performance
the obligations and rights of the parties hereto.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 638, et seq., all legal actions shall be
heard by a referee who shall be a retired judge from either the San Bernardino County Superior
Court, the California Court of Appeal, the United States District Court or the United States Court
of Appeals, provided that the selected referee shall have experience in resolving land use and real
property disputes. Owner and City shall agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues,
9
7106512 2/3
whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon and issue all legal and
equitable relief appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy before such referee. If
Owner and City are unable to agree on a referee within ten days of a written request to do so by
either party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall initially be borne equally by the
parties. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section v.H. shall be considered a temporary judge
appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution.
I. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by City or Owner to insist upon the strict
performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement, irrespective of the length of time for
which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of the right to demand strict
compliance with this Agreement in the futura. No waiver by City or Owner of a default or
breach of any other party shall be effective or binding upon it unless made in writing, and no
such waiver shall be implied from any omission by City or Owner to take any action with respect
lo such default or breach. No express written waiver of any defaults or breach shall affect any
other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or broach and/or
period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers of a default or
breach under any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any subsequent default or
breach, and the performance of the same or any other term or provision contained in this
Agreement. Subject to notice of default and opportunity to cure under Section v.E., all of the
remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, at law or in equity, shall be cumulative
and alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or
election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right or remedy.
J. Future Litigation Expenses.
1. Payment to Prevailing Party. If City or Owner brings an action or
proceeding (including, without limitation, any motion, order to show cause, cross-complaint,
counterclaim, or third-party claim) by mason of defaults, broaches, tortious acts, or otherwise
arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled
to its costs and expenses of suit including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and
expert witness fees.
2. Scope of Fees. Attorneys' fees under this Section shall include attorneys'
fees on any appeal and, in addition, a party entitled lo attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other
reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action. In addition to the
foregoing award of attorneys' fees to the prevailing party, the prevailing party in any lawsuit
shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees incurred in any post-judgment proceedings to collect or
enforce the judgment. This provision is separate and several and shall survive the merger of this
Agreement into any judgment on this Agreement.
K. Term. Unless the "Term" (as hereinafter defined) of this Agreement is otherwise
terminated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by mutual
consent of the par[les, the duration of this Development Agreement (the "Term") shall be the
longer of either of the fo]lowing: (i) five (5) years; or (ii) the expiration of the Project Approvals.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if construction of the Project is commenced within the Term, and
then before the Term of this Agreement would otherwise expire, the Project is thereafter
t0
71G655.2 ~ J ~1~
destroyed by tire, other calamity, by an act of God, or by the public enemy, the Project may be
restored and the previously authorized uses completed, provided that restoration is started within
one year thereafter and diligently pursued to completion.
L. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws.
1. Permitted Delays. In addition to any specific provisions of this
Agreement, performance of obligations hereunder shall be excused and the Term of this
Agreement shall be similarly extended during any period of delay caused atany time by reason
of: acts of God such as floods, earthquakes, rites, or similar catastrophes; wars, riots or similar
hostilities; strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control (including the party's
employment force); the enactment of new laws or restrictions imposed or mandated by other
governmental or quasi-governmental entities preventing this Agreement from being
implemented; litigation involving this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Future Approvals
or the Ministerial Approvals, which directly or indirectly delays any activity contemplated
hereunder, delay in the issuance of bonds or formation of the CFD or other Financing
Mechanism; or other causes beyond the party's control. City and Owner shall promptly notify
the other party of any delay hereunder as soon as possible after the same has been ascertained.
2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws. If any federal or state law, made or
enacted after the Effective Date prevents or precludes compliance with one or more provisions of
this Agreement, then the provisions of this Agreement shall, to the extent feasible, be modified
or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such new law. Immediately after enactment or
promulgation of any such new law, City and Owner shall meet and confer in good faith to
determine the feasibility of any such modification or suspension based on the effect such
modification or suspension would have on the purposes and intent of this Agreement. Owner'
and/or City shall have the right to challenge the new law preventing compliance with the terms
of this Agreement, and in the event such challenge is successful, this Agreement shall remain
unmodified and in full force and effect. At Owner's sole option, the term of this Agreement may
be extended for the duration of the period during which such new law precludes compliance with
the provisions of this Agreement.
M. Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended from time to time
by mutual consent of the parties to this Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868.
SECTION VI, MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Negation of Partnership. The Project constitutes private development, neither
City nor Owner is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and City and Owner
are independent entities with respect to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. None of the
terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between or among
the parties in the businesses of Owner, the affairs of City, or otherwise, nor shall it cause them to
be considered joint venturers or members of any joint enterprise.
B. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended, nor shall it be
construed, to create any third-party beneficiary fights in any person who is not a party, unless
expressly otherwise provided.
C. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire
understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations,
understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or
expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations,
understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to
interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement.
D. Severabilit¥. Invalidation of any of the provisions contained in this Agreement,
or of the application thereof to any person, by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any
of the other provisions hereof or the application thereof to any other person or circumstance, and
the same shall remain in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this Agreement, as so
invalidated, would be unreasonable or inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate
the purposes of this Agreement and the fights and obligations of the parties hereto.
E. Construction of Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement and the
Exhibits hereto shall be construed as a whole according to their common meaning and not
strictly for or against Owner or City and consistent with the provisions hereof, in order to
achieve the objectives and purposes. Wherever required by the context, the singular shall
include the plural and vice versa, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine or neuter
genders, or vice versa.
F. Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for
convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
G. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.
H. Notices. Any notice shall be in writing and given by delivering the same in
person or by sending the same by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, with
postage prepaid, by overnight delivery, or by facsimile to the respective mailing addresses, as
follows:
City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive,
Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Attention: City Manager
Facsimile: (909) 477-2849
Copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon
Attorneys at Law
Number One Civic Center Circle
P. O. Box 1059
Brea, CA 92822-1059
12
Attention: James L. Markman, Esq.
Facsimile: (714) 990-6230
Owner: FountainGlen Properties, LP
4220 Von Karman, 2nd Floor.
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Glenn Carpenter
Facsimile: (949) 223-5032
Copy to: Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2300,
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Attention: Lewis G. Feldman, Esq.
Facsimile: (310) 286-6672
Either City or Owner may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such
change to the other in the manner provided herein at least ten days prior to the date such change
is effected. All notices under this Agreement shall be deemed given, received, made or
communicated on the earlier of the date personal delivery is effected or on the delivery date or
attempted delivery date shown on the return receipt, air bill or facsimile.
1. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and of each and
every term and condition hereof.
J. Limitation of Liability. City hereby acknowledges and agrees that Owner's
obligations under this Agreement are solely those of FountainGlen, L.P. and in no event shall
any present, past or future officer, director, shareholder, employee, partner, affiliate, manager,
representative or agent of Owner ("Related Parties") have any personal liability, directly or
indirectly, under this Agreement and recourse shall not be available against Owner or any
Related Party in connection with this Agreement or any other document or instrument heretofore
or hereafter executed in connection with this Agreement. The limitations of liability provided in
this Section are in addition to, and not in limitation of, any limitation on liability applicable to
Owner or any Related Party provided by law or in any other contract, agreement or instrument.
K. Recordation. In order to comply with Section 65868.5 of the Government Code,
the parties do hereby direct the City Clerk to record a copy of this Agreement against the
Property with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County within ten (10) days after the
Effective Date.
13
710655.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and City have executed this Agreement as of the date
first hereinabove written.
"City"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a municipal corporation
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
By:
City Attorney
"Owner"
FOUNTAINGLEN PROPERTIES LP, ·
a Delaware limited partnership
"General Partner"
By:
Name:
Title:
S-I
710655.2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
On ,2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said County and State, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed Io the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the within
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
On ,2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said County and State, personally appeared
, personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the within
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Being the portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 15455, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 191 of
Pa~'cel Maps, pages 33 through 35, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said
County.
EXHIBIT "B"
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: City Clerk
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
REGARDING SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT
This Declaration of Restrictions (the "Declaration") is executed as of
,2002, by FountainGlen Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
CFountainGlen").
RECITALS
A. FountainGlen is the owner of certain real property generally located near the
southwest corner of Church Street and Maylen Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property").
B. FountainGlen submitted an application for development of a senior housing
apartment complex containing approximately two hundred sixteen (216) dwelling units for
senior citizens (the "Project'). In order for FountainGlen to satisfy certain requirements of the
Development Agreement entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
FountainGlen (the "Development Agreement") and effective on , FountainGlen
desires to impose certain restrictions on the Property.
C. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (the "City"), is intended
to be a third party beneficiary of this Declaration, such that consent of the City in a form to be
recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bemardino, shall be required for the
modification of revocation of the restrictions imposed herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, FountainGlen hereby declares and agrees as follows.
1. Occupancy Restrictions. In accordance with the Project Approvals as defined in
the Development Agreement, the Project shall be a senior housing project by which, with the
exception of the employees of FountainGlen, at least one resident in each housing unit in the
Project shall be at least 55 years of age and each other resident in the same dwelling unit, if any,
shall be a qualified permanent resident, a permitted health care resident, or a person under 55
years of age whose occupancy Js permitted under subdivision (h) of Civil Code Section 51.3 or
under subdivision (b) of Civil Code Section 51.4.
B-2
2. Term. This Declaration and the restrictions against the Property contained herein
shall automatically terminate and cease to affect the Property upon the earlier of (i) the complete
demolition of the Project, or (ii) approval of the City pursuant to the Code of a change in use
from a senior housing project operated in accordance with the occupancy restrictions set forth in
Section I of this Declaration to some other use of the Property. Upon notice of the occurrence of
such event, the City Planner of City or his designee shall execute and record a document
confirming the termination of this Declaration. Subject to the foregoing, the Property shall
hereafter be held, transferred, sold, leased, conveyed and occupied subject to the restrictions,
covenants, and obligations set forth heroin.
3. Modification~ Revocation or Termination. This Declaration has been recorded in
order to satisfy the requirements of the Development Agreement and to obtain the approval by
the City of certain permits for the Project. The restrictions created herein may not be modified,
revoked or terminated, except as provided in Section 2, without the written consent of the then
record owner of the Property, and any such modification, revocation or termination shall not be
effective unless and until the City consents thereto in writing after receiving written notice
thereof from the then record owners of the Property, and such modification, revocation or
termination, executed by the City Planner of City, is recorded in the Official Records of the
County of San Bemardino.
4. Third Party Beneficiary. The City is intended to be a third party beneficiary Of
this Declaration, with the right to consent to any modification or revocation hereof and the right
and authority, at its sole option, to enforce the provisions hereof (including, but not limited to
remedies for violation of a building permit); provided, however, that the City shall have no
liability whatsoever hereunder with respect to the condition of the Property.
5. Dedication. Nothing contained in this Declaration shall be deemed a gift or
dedication of any portion of the Property to the general public or for the general public or for any
public purpose whatsoever. It is the intention of FountainGlen that this Declaration shall be
strictly limited to and for the purposes expressed herein.
6. Successors. The restrictions contained herein shall run with the land and
automatically, and without further action by FountainGlen bind and inure to the benefit of the
heirs, assigns, personal representatives, transferees and successors of FountainGlen.
7. Goveming Law. This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
8. Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this
Declaration with respect to a particular party or set of circumstances shah not in any way affect
the validity or enforceability of any other provision hereof, or the same provision wl)en applied
to another party or a different set of circumstances.
9. Authority. The persons executing this Declaration on behalf of FountainGlen do
hereby covenant and warrant that FountainGlen is a duly authorized and existing lirmted · ..
partnership, and that FountainGlen has and is qualified to do business in California, that
B-3
7]0655.2
FountainGlen has full right and authority to enter into this Declaration, and the persons signing
on behalf of FountainGlen are authorized to do so.
10. Counterparts. This Declaration may be executed in counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same
Declaration.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FountainGlen executed this instrument effective as of the day
and year first above written, and City has accepted this Declaration..
FountainGlen, L.P.
a Delaware limited partnership
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
APPROVED:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Mayor
A'I~EST
City Clerk
710655.2
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Being the _portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 15455, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 191 of
Parcel Maps, pages 33 through 35, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of said
County.
7]0655.2
TH E C I T Y OF
]~A N C H 0 C U CA M 0 N C,A
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager
BY: Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst II
DATE: November 20, 2002
SUBJECT: Consideration of the City's Information Technology (IT) Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council consider and approve the City's Information
Technology (IT) Master Plan, which has been developed in conjunction with a consulting
team from Deloitte & Touche. The Information Technology (IT) Master Plan is a
comprehensive look at information and communication technology relevant to the
operations of the City. The Plan explores the options for the use of information
technology to provide service to our citizens, businesses, and employees.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has worked hard to create a strong technological
environment, implementing a number of information technology programs and
applications over the last few years in response to the changing needs of our employees
and customers. To build further on these successful efforts, the City initiated the
development of an Information Technology (IT) Master Plan in the Summer of 2001.
This process was introduced to the City Council on September 5, 2001.
In the late Spring of 2001, the consulting firm of Deloitte & Touche was retained after a
competitive bid process, to assist the City in developing this Master Plan. The goal of
the City's IT Master Plan was to develop a longer range (3-5 year) plan, to identify
information technology projects to enhance our internal and external effectiveness and
the services we prpvide to the community; including our residential, industrial, and
commercial customers. The Plan is intended to be a living document, which will be
updated periodically to respond to the needs of our community and changes in the.
technological environment.
The objectives for the Information Technology Master Plan are to:
· Analyze areas of information and communication technology relevant to the
operations of the City.
· Identify information technology to meet internal and external customer needs.
· Solicit and consider innovative ideas being used by similar cities.
· Identify and recommend Citywide strategic technology objectives that could link
the City's existing and future technical infrastructure.
· Identify and recommend priority technology projects with high-level staffing and
technical cost estimates.
· Develop and recommend a Citywide technology project compliance and
oversight process.
ANALYSIS:
The Information Technology Master Plan meets the aforementioned objectives by
presenting a comprehensive plan to guide the City to a higher level in the area of
information technology. The research, recommendations, and conclusions are based
upon the extensive involvement of participants from the community, business, and input
from City management, line staff, and established technology committees.
The Plan presented for your consideration tonight covers areas of information and
communication technology relevant to the operations of the City. This includes internal
City operations and services, as well as external interaction and communication with
other agencies, schools, and business associates and residential/business customers.
The Plan states a City information technology vision and strategic objectives that will be
used as a framework to evaluate future projects to ensure that projects are aligned with
the City's objectives.
The Plan identifies and documents the City's current technology architecture.
Additionally, it outlines internal and external technology necessary to enhance customer
needs, and a strategy for accomplishing and developing proposed technological
improvements and solutions for the future. The research and recommendations of the
Plan will build upon the technology efforts of the past and guide the City's technology
programs and projects into the future.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the City's Information
Technology (IT) Master Plan, which has been developed in conjunction with a
consulting team from Deloitte & Touche. With this Plan, the City will build upon the
-2-
technology efforts of the past and guide the City's technology programs and projects
into the future.
Respectfully submitted,
Pamela Easter
Deputy City Manager
Attachments -- Information Technology (IT) Master Plan Executive Summary
--Attached as a separate document is the entire Information Technology
(IT) Master Plan
73-
Executive Summary
This Executive Summary provides a high-level synopsis of the Rancho
Cucamonga Information Technology Master Plan Report. The
summary follows the report format and explains how the plan was
developed, what areas it addresses, and describes the current status of
the City regarding information technology. It includes identified needs,
as well as recommended strategic objectives, priority projects and
implementation plan for the City's consideration.
Introduction
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a leader in utilizing technology as a
means of improving operations and services for the benefit of its
businesses, citizens, and employees. The City's websites provide
residents and businesses with information on Rancho Cucamonga.
Residents may sign up for park and recreation classes on the Internet,
receive library services, and find City job information. Elementary
school children can learn about City government through the City's
Kids Page. Commercial brokers and developers interested in investing
in the website can find out information on the City and vacant,
developable property. In the area of telecommunications, residents can
watch live broadcasts of Council meetings and find community
information on the City's Government Access Channel, RCTV3.
Within the City organization, technology is used extensively, from
tracking development permits to monitoring the water usage in our
parks.
These are examples of what the City has already accomplished in the
area of information technology. As part of its continued interest in
advancing its use of technology, the City made the decision in 2001 to
complete an Information Technology Master Plan. The goal of the
Plan is to build upon the work that has been done and develop a
CiO, Ri'Rancho O,camottga Deloitte
I~lfi~rmatio~t 7~chm~log}, Mclxt~r Pla~t, Draft of Fi.al Report Page I &Touche
Executive Summary
roadmap of what the City wants to accomplish in the upcoming three
to five years.
Project Overview
The goal of the Information Technology Master Plan is to develop a
longer range (3-5 year) plan that will identify technology projects to
enhance internal and external effectiveness, as well as the services
provided to our residential, industrial, and commercial customers. This
Plan is considered a living document, which will be updated
periodically to respond to the needs of the community and changes in
the technological environment.
The objectives for this Information Technology Master Plan are to:
· Analyze areas of information and communication technology
relevant to the operations of the City.
· Identify information technology to meet internal and external
customer needs.
· Solicit and consider innovative ideas being used by similar
cities.
· Identify and recommend Citywide strategic technology
objectives that could link the City's existing and future
technical infrastructure.
· Identify and recommend priority technology projects with
high-level staffing and technical cost estimates.
· Develop and recommend a Citywide technology project
compliance and oversight process.
Project Scope
The Information Technology Master Plan covers areas of information
and communication technology relevant to the operations of the City.
This includes internal City operations and services, as well as external
interaction and communication with other agencies, schools, business
associates and residential/business customers.
The Plan identifies and documents the City's current technology
architecture. Additionally, it outlines internal and external technology
necessary to enhance customer needs, and a strategy for accomplishing
and developing proposed technological improvements and solutions
for the future.
CIO,' r¢ Ra.cllo Citcrtmo.ga Deloitte
&Touche
l,¢~r,,~atio,~ Tech,~olo1.g.' ,~/aster HaJ,, Drq/i of ?i,,al l~ef~or~ Page2 ad~2
Executive Summary
As part of their work, the project consultants from Deloitte & Touche
also recommend that the City consider developing a more formalized
management process to oversee technology related projects. At the
City's request, Deloitte & Touche staff has completed a separate report
that elaborates on this proposed process. The report considers the
recommendations in the Plan and develops a management process that
would be effective with those recommendations.
Community and Staff Input
The most significant factor in the development of this Information
Technology Master Plan is the extensive involvement of participants.
As part of its operating commitment to participation and partnerships,
the project embraces the City's strategies for maximizing significant
community and business input. These strategies focuses on the active
involvement and support of community, business, education and
governmental representatives, as well as City management, line staff,
and established technology committees.
The means for gaining input from these key groups included one-on-
one and phone interviews, focus groups, and voice and eMail
connections. The outcome was information on prior technology
achievements, as well as technology needs to meet the City's future.
II Project Approach
Project Organization and Methodology
A team of professionals from Deloitte & Touche conducted the project
with the assistance of a Rancho Cucamonga Steering Committee. The
Steering Committee is comprised of individuals with an
understanding of the City's services, functions, information
technology and a vision for the future. Throughout the project, the
Steering Committee provided guidance and direction, and was
essential in identifying the key stakeholders and encouraging staff and
community participation.
There were three phases in the Deloitte & Touche project methodology
including current assessment, strategy development and plan
development. Each of these phases answered specific questions,
factoring identified need areas, for consideration within the process.
City of Ranc/Io Cucamonga Deloitte
&Touche
InJbrmation Technology Maxle; Plan. D,-q~ of Final Report Page3 ~
Executive Summary
Data Gathering, Interviews and Themes of the
Focus Groups
The project team spent a significant portion of its time gathering and
analyzing data gained from four primary sources: inventory data,
interviews/focus groups, peer cities survey and document review.
The interviews and focus groups were designed to solicit input from
the participants about information technology within the City. Intemal
City participants provided information regarding historical
information, technology growth and long-term technology direction
and needs, as well as development, support and specific department or
job related concerns. External focus groups input was predominately
around access to City information and how the City could encourage
greater participation within a particular interest group.
The general themes from all of the focus groups were that the City
should:
* Continue to share information and make it accessible to staff
and citizens, businesses and other interested extemal bodies.
e Manage the project implementation process to set and meet
realistic expectations by providing dedicated resources and
establishing realistic timelines.
e Continue and expand the provision of City services using
technology (predominantly focused on the Web).
· Internally, complete the plans for a high-speed, high capacity
multi-media infrastructure (Rancho High-Speed Fiber Highway).
· Expand the technical and application functional training
throughout the organization.
e Establish the standards for determining centralized vs.
distributed applications.
· Ensure consistent Information Systems Division support and
services to other departments and end-users.
Surveys
The City is not alone in its efforts to utilize technology. Many other
local governments are experimenting with various uses of information
technology and best practices are emerging. Towards that end, the
City and Deloitte & Touche jointly identified five cities (Carlsbad,
Escondido, Irvine, Ontario in California, and Phoenix, Arizona) for
inclusion in a survey to identify key technology strategies that could
('it); of Rancho ( Tucamo.ga Deloitte
&Touche
lnJbrmation Teclmology Mr¢3ter Plan, Drq/¢ of FinaI Report Page4 2~/
Executive Summary
be of interest to Rancho Cucamonga. The cities of Carlsbad,
Escondido, and Ontario were chosen because they are Southern
California cities with similar qualities to Rancho Cucamonga. The
cities of Irvine and Phoenix were chosen because of the leadership role
that they have played in information technology and strategic
planning.
Additionally, the survey findings supplemented information gained
from independent Deloitte & Touche research. Specifically, this
research focused on the area of technology trends to aid in developing
the recommended information technology strategic direction for the
City.
The survey focused on five topic areas, including information
technology planning/organizational approach, information technology
service delivery, eGovernment, fiber optic network strategic planning,
and geographic information systems.
III Research Findings
Deloitte & Touche reviewed current trends in the various aspects of
technology, from hardware and applications to telecommunications to
data management. Section 1V of this Report provides the findings as
well as recommendations for the City to consider in the various areas.
IV Special Technology Considerations
In developing the program of work for the Master Plan study, the City
identified five topical areas in which it wanted special research and
analysis completed. These five areas included:
· Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
· Economic Development
· Digital Divide
· Wireless Communications
· Telecommunications Act of 1996
· Partnerships with Community and Region
The City staff selected these areas because of their potential impact on
the City's effective use of technology. The following provides a
City of Rare'ho C.c~m~o.ga Deloitte
]~/brmati°n Tech't°l°gg' Ma.'ter Plan. Drafi of Final Repor! Page5 &T°u'h~l~ 32
Executive Summary
summary of the research and analysis done by Deloitte & Touche for
these areas. More detailed information, including background,
detailed analysis, and recommendations are found in the Special
Technology Considerations section of this Report.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The ADA of 1990, is a comprehensive federal civil-rights statute
protecting the rights of people with disabilities. The ADA affects
access to employment, state and local government programs and
services, as well as access to places of public accommodation,
transportation, and telecommunications.
As part of the Master Plan, the City is interested in being able to
identify additional opportunities for access for those with disabilities.
Deloitte & Touche suggests that an ADA component be included into
the design and implementation of several of the Priority Priorities that
are recommended later on in this Report, including the continued
development of an eGoverament Strategy as well as the
implementation of Interactive Transactions.
Economic Development
Community profile information was gathered and analyzed to provide
a framework from which the City can consider how best to build upon
what it already has in terms of location, population base, and business
envirornnent.
Recognizing the key role cormmmications play in economic
development, the City should continue, and build upon, providing
conduit through main streets around and within the business
commtmity. The City should also explore the potential to lease dark
fiber within the City's fiber network.
Digital Divide
The tremendous growth in household computer and Interact use has
occurred across all demographic groups, including income and
education levels, ethnicity, locations, and household types.
Nevertheless, research indicates that some Americans are still
connecting at far lower rates than others, creating a digital divide. As
more and more commercial activity, government services, and health
and educational material are offered online, access to the Internet has
become increasingly important.
City of Rancho Cucamo.ga Deloitte
&Touche
lnJbrmation rechnoh~gy Master l'lan, L)rq/~ ~( FinaI Report Page6 ,~33
Executive Summary
The City wants to provide opportunities to access technology and
government for all demographic groups. It is recommended that the
City should continue to address the digital divide in the various
technology projects that provide information and services to the
community, including the continued development of an eGovernment
strategy as well as the implementation of interactive transactions.
Digital divide mitigation should also be incorporated in City outreach
programs, housing initiatives and public service advertising.
Wireless Communications
The City's current use of wireless technology is predominantly radio
and voice-based. The mobile staff in the departments use radios for
communication and many staff use cellular phones. The City is
currently looking at ways to expand the use of wireless technology
beyond voice. The Fire Department is testing mobile data computers to
access various data sources, in tactical/emergency and administrative
situations.
The use of wireless technology for Police, Fire and field personnel
from Building and Safety, Engineering, etc. represents the best
opportunities for the City at this time. Additionally, the City interacts
with a number of other governmental agencies where sharing of
information would be helpful, especially in emergency situations.
These agencies include the public schools, Cucamonga County Water
District, community colleges and San Bernardino County. Wireless
technology might facilitate sharing of information, especially
geographic information systems information.
Telecommunications Act of 1996
The Telecommunications Act of 1996, (the Act) is intended to open
telecommunications markets to new competition. The Act envisions a
network of interconnected networks that are composed of
complementary components and generally provide both competing and
complementary services. It uses both structural and behavioral
instruments to accomplish its goals and attempts to reduce regulatory
barriers to entry and competition. It outlaws artificial barriers to entry
in local exchange markets, in its attempt to accomplish the maximum
possible competition. Moreover, it mandates interconnection of
telecommunications networks, unbundling, non-discrimination, and
cost-based pricing of leased parts of the network, so that competitors
can enter easily and compete component-by-component as well as
service-by-service.
CIO,' o/Ram'ho Cucamo.ga Deloitte
&Touche
infi, rmatio,, Tech,,oh,gy Ma.~te,* Pla,,. D,'ql* of Fi,,al Re?ort Page7 ~ 3 ¢
Executive Summary
Though the implementation of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 is
still an evolving process and being challenged in courts, there are a
number of recommendations that the City can consider as part of its
overall long-term goals.
It is recommended that the City develop a separate, yet complementary
strategic telecommunications plan as a subset of the Information
Technology Master Plan. Such a plan could provide specific options
on wireless technology, fiber networks, and increased competitions
and constraints.
Deloitte & Touche further recommends that the City continue to
facilitate dialogue with telecom providers; broaden efforts with local,
state and national coalitions; continue existing contractual agreements;
and leverage existing telecom and/or cable television providers to
share fiber networks, trenches, and services.
Partnerships with Community and Region
Partnerships between the City and organizations within the community
and region are of great value to the City's Information Technology
Master Plan. City staff and management have expressed a desire to
partner with the community in the area of technology planning and
implementation. Likewise, representatives from education and
community groups expressed a desire to partner with the City during
the fact gathering focus group sessions. These groups expressed a
desire for partnerships between the City, business community, and
community organizations in disaster planning and response, public
safety related communications, kiosk use and an expanded Website.
An approach to developing partnerships and alliances is for specific
City departments, perhaps through the eGovernment and technology
steering committees and other task forces, to identify specific
organizations for partnering. Organizations should be targeted in
industry, community, government and education.
V Current Environment
While doing research on various technology trends, best practices of
other cities, and special knowledge areas, Deloitte & Touche also
reviewed the City's existing information technology system and
operations. The following is a summary of the review.
CIO.' of Ra.c/io Cucamo~zga Deloitte
&Touche
1,¢brmatio,, Tech,,olo~9' Maxte; Pla,,. D,'(¢i of Final Report Page 8 ' ~
Executive Summary
Overview of the City's Information Technology
System
The City has made an overall commitment to creating a strong
technology environment for its internal organization, as well as its
residents and businesses.
Internally, over the last three to five years, the City has made
significant upgrades and changes to its information technology,
including its hardware infrastructure, network architecture, and
software applications. There have also been efforts made towards the
integration of various uses and programs.
The City also has Websites to provide services and information to the
public and business community via the Internet. The range of
information includes information regarding the City's inventory of
commercial and retail land uses, programs and services provided by
the City, and comprehensive library services. The City also maintains
an internal shared informational Intranet site for City employees.
The City is served by and has franchise agreements with two cable
companies: Charter Communications and Adelphia. The City has a
government access channel, RC TV 3, which televises the biweekly
council meetings both live and in playback. The channel has a bulletin
scroll board and broadcasts public interest videos. The City is
proactive in the development of a fiber optic network to install cabling
in a phased effort to connect City Hall and remote City facilities
Information Systems Division and Geographic
Information Systems/Special Districts Division
Information technology resources within the City are primarily
distributed within three divisions: Information Systems, Geographic
Information Systems, and Purchasing, which has telecommunications
function responsibility. Additionally, there are City information
technology resoumes in other departments, in particular at the Library
and Fire Department.
City information technology resources support applications, systems,
and end users through twelve categories of services to meet business
needs and user requirements, and maintain technologies. The
categories include administrative support, application support, work
requests, network and system administration, supervisory, help desk,
personal computer downstreaming, telecommunications, new projects,
Council Chamber on-call/audio visual, user training, and information
systems training.
(~iO~' of Rant/lo ()~camollga Deloitte
,r~jbrmation Teclmolo,t~, Ma~tcr Plan, Di'~ of Final Report Page 9 &Touche
Executive Summary
Rancho Cucamonga operates and maintains a diverse array of
computer hardware and software systems to carry out its municipal
functions. The City is proactive in creating a technological
environment to meet its needs. To limit the proliferation of
incompatible systems and promote a uniform technology strategy, the
City has adopted technology standards that govern the acquisition of
new technologies.
Current Projects
The Information Systems, Geographic Information Systems and
Purchasing divisions identified a series of current information
technology projects, application modifications, and system upgrade
projects. The projects were categorized as either departmental or
Citywide infrastructure-related projects. Over half are infrastructure
related as opposed to being related to a specific department.
At the time of the current projects survey, 41 projects were identified
based on departmental requests and needs. Of these requests, 15 were
active and 27 were planned. These projects exclude those that were
identified as a result of focus groups and interviews as part of the
Information Technology Master Plan.
VI Statement of Vision and Strategic Objectives
A key component of the project was the development of a City vision
for Information Technology, as well as the strategic objectives that
will guide the City's technology efforts. After completing the study of
technology trends and other cities' best practices as well as community
and employee feedback, a proposed vision statement and related
strategic objectives was developed. The following paragraphs reflect
Deloitte & Touche's reconnnendations.
Statement of Vision
The proposed vision seeks to demonstrate the City's ongoing
commitment to technology and the integral place that it has in all lives.
Recognizing that information technology is a comerstone of the 21st
century, the City sees it as a way to broaden and enhance the services
that it provides the community as well as improve its own initial usage
and testing by others.
Cio,' of Rare'ho Cucamonga Deloitte
&Touche
',~/b,'mation Tech,,ology Maxter ?lan, Drc~of l'3,,aI Re?ort ?age l O
Executive Summary
Therefore, the City's Vision for information technology in Rancho
Cucamonga is:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga will sustain an information
technology environment that fosters and strives to expand external
access to City services and information as well as enhances the
business community environment. The City will further apply
technology in its internal operations to maximize customer service,
information sharing, and organizational productivity.
Strategic Objectives
The following recommended Strategic Objectives reflect a "fleshing
out" of the City's Vision. These reflect the input received and are
intended to be broad statements of the City's intent and goals. They
are not independent but complementary to each other. The
recommended Strategic Objectives are:
· Enhance and provide an expanded high-level of customer
service to the community (residents and businesses,
organizations, schools, etc) through the use of technology.
· Facilitate Information Technology infrastructure and
technology-related services to attract new businesses, and
retain and enable the success of existing businesses.
· Provide effective Citywide technology management
processes.
· Utilize and leverage current investments in technology.
· Enhance support to internal users through the use of
technology.
Section VII Project Strategies and Priorities
Deloitte & Touche worked closely with the Steering Committee to
identify projects that had a high degree of synergy with the
Information Technology Master Plan's recommended Vision and
Strategic Objectives; and that offered the best initial long-term impact.
To afford maximum flexibility, projects are broad-based and have
multiple sub-projects/phases, which can be further adjusted to
accommodate changing economic conditions, developing technology
advances, as well as internal and external needs. The recommended
projects are not independent, but complementary to each other.
('i0" of Rare'ho Cucamo~ga Deloitte
&Touche
l,~fi>,'mation Techt,oh~gy Ma3-tt. r Pla,,. D,'q/i of Final Report Pa.ge l t ~ ~ ~
Executive Summary
Priority Project 1: Adopt and Implement Information Technology
Project Approval and Review Process (IT-PAR) - Since
information technology projects often require sizable investment, and
create significant expectations throughout the City and community, it
is important that a more formalized management structure be put into
place to oversee the projects and expectations from a City wide
perspective. Technology can enhance service delivery, establish
reliable business workflow, generate value added cost-savings, and
provide greater accountability. This project is the top Priority Project
recommended for adoption in the Information Technology Master
Plan. It is seen as one of thc most significant business process changes
to be adopted by thc City. It is recommended that thc City implement
this process in thc following sequence:
· Adopt Information Technology Project Approval and
Review Process (IT-PAR).
* Establish membership to Technology Steering Committee
and Technical Review Group.
· Technology Steering Committee Initiates the IT-PAR.
This process will establish and sanction "rules of thc road" for
reviewing and monitoring the implementation of technology related
projects within thc City and will promote interdepartmental
cooperation. Through the annual City budget process, information
technology projects and necessary resources will be identified and
prioritized for management and City Council's information and
endorsement.
Priority Project 2: Expand High-Speed Internal Infrastructure
and Communications - Three years ago, the City commenced a
multi-phase project to install a fiber optic network between facilities.
The first two phases are now complete, and a third phase will continue
connections between additional outlying City facilities and City Hall.
This high-speed fiber network should be considered a part of the
Rancho High-Speed Fiber Highway (see Project 3.2.). There are a
number of related activities within this project:
, Complete Phase III Installation of Internal Fiber Network
and Commence the Development of Subsequent Phases.
· Implement Internal Video Conferencing Capability at City
Locations Through a Phased Process.
· Provide Mobile Access to City Geographic Information
Systems.
· Develop Strategy to Mitigate Cell-phone Blackout Areas.
CiO' of Ramq~o C. camo¢~go Deloitte
l,~fi~,'matio,, Tcch,tology34axtcrPlatt, Drq/~ofFi,mlReport Pagel2 &Touch~.~ ~,~,~--A
Executive Summary
· Identify Technology Needs and Uses for Upcoming City
Facilities.
An internal high-speed communications network will provide
significant opportunities to enhance customer service to both internal
and external customers. The internal departments should see the most
benefit since location will not be an issue in data, voice or video
access.
Priority Project 3: Facilitate the Development of a High-Speed
Fiber Area Network -This network, known as the Rancho High-
Speed Fiber Highway, will impact citizens, businesses, and other
governmental agencies within the City. It is an important tool that the
City can use to encourage economic development. The major
components of this project are to:
· Review Completed Studies and Develop Consensus on
Next Steps - (internally) for the advancement of the
Rancho High-Speed Fiber Highway.
· Build Community Support - (citizen, business and
government) for the private sector development of the
Rancho High-Speed Fiber Highway.
· Facilitate Financing and Implementation - Explore options,
finance and build the Rancho High-Speed Fiber Highway.
· Enact City-enabling Legislation Encourage private sector
investment through the enactment of legislation on building
permits and development projects.
Benefits from developing the Rancho High-Speed Fiber Highway will
include improved access to City services for community members and
a potential reduction in cost of expanding the City's own internal
communication network. It will create incentives for economic
development and high-end residential development for professionals.
Priority Project 4: Develop eGovernment Strategy - eGovermnent
is an integral element of the City's overall information technology
efforts. Defining what the City would like to provide through its
Internet Websites is the first step in making as much information, and
as many services as possible, available via the Internet. Objectives are
to provide easier customer access, increase service volume, and
improve customer service. In defining the customer services to be
delivered, the City must understand the Intemet's value proposition for
a particular service, identify the shortest path to a transaction's
completion, and define services that differentiate and fulfill customer
City of Rare'ho CuctImo.ga Deloitte
lnfi~rmation Tech,lolog)' Ma,,'ter Plan, Drqli of Final Report Page/3 &Touche ,~/~
Executive Summary
needs. Additionally, an ongoing assessment and feedback mechanism
should be established to give the City relevant data needed to identify
and rectify possible gaps in service design, technology infrastructure
and staffing. This project should be conducted in these stages:
· Define eGovemment for Rancho Cucamonga.
· Delineate Customer Services to be Delivered.
· Identify Feedback Mechanism.
The goal of this strategy planning is to provide citizens with better
services. It prevents a piecemeal, project-based approach to
· eGovemment. A solid strategy connects all projects to the Information
Technology Master Plan and builds sufficient contingencies to adapt to
changes in technology and customer needs.
Priority Project 5: Identify and Implement Interactive
Transactions - This is a broad-based effort that works in conjunction
with the eGovemment project. The goal is to expand the interactive
transactions that the City has already implemented, such as the
Community Services Department Class registration program and
Redevelopment Agency's Inside Rancho property information
program.
The first phase will be the identification of common sub-projects and
associated requirements. This will be followed by a formalized plan
submitted to the Technology Steering Committee for selected sub-
projects. Key sub-projects include the following:
· Provide Selected City Forms Online and Publish
Regulations on the City's Website - to enhance business
and community interaction.
· Develop Marketing Program for City's eGovernment
Services.
, Provide Online Scheduling of Inspections and Status
Checking of Permitting Process.
· Provide Online Payment Capabilities.
Interactive transactions provide another means for the public to access
forms and information, other than visiting or telephoning City Hall.
These transactions deliver a higher level of service delivery to
residents and developers, especially those that interact frequently with
the City. Staff productivity is improved through the use of existing
City soft~vare technology, integrated Citywide technology, and by
streamlining internal processes.
('it)' of Rant~lo C. camo//ga Deloitte
lnJbrmation Teclmolog)'Ma.,tc, rPla/1, Drq/iofFi,lall~eport Pagel4 &T°uch "~'
Executive Summary
Priority Project 6: Develop Enterprise-wide Geographic
Information Systems - This is part of the City's objective to move to
an integrated, enterprise-wide Geographic Information Systems
capability and accessibility. Geographic Information Systems can
incorporate any data with a geographic coordinate or field, which is
critical for government bccansc approximately eighty percent of all
public sector operations arc geographically referenced. Data storage
should be migrated to a relational database management system in
order to reduce redundancies, solve data version problems, optimize
performance, and allow for growth in users. This project includes thc
following components:
, Create Organizational Structure and Business Processes to
Centrally Manage Geographic Information Systems data.
· Develop a Shared Data Repository that is Available to All
'Departments and the Community.
, Establish Standards, Policies and Tools for Enterprise-wide
Geographic Information Systems.
This project will support greater operational efficiency and
constituency-centered services through a higher level of
interopcrability and data sharing. Defining standards, policies and
tools will reduce rcdnndancics, optimize system performance, and
solve data version problems. Organizational changes will improve
intcmal data sharing and accessibility, provide new services and
possible revenue sources, as well as reduce staff redundancies.
Priority Project 7: Provide Technology Training to City Staff-
Functional training needs were identified in MS Office Suite,
Tidemark and BiTcch applications. Application/software training that
is now offered to permanent employees should be expanded to include
new, temporary and summer hims. Annual technical training plans
should be developed and implemented for personnel in thc Information
Systems and Geographical Information Systems Divisions. Thc two
areas of training arc to:
, Provide Functional Training.
· Provide Technical Training.
A formalized training plan for thc City's functional and technical
application users will allow the City to get the most benefit from its
current and future technology investments. Training should increase
employee productivity, satisfaction and customer service. Help desk
"how to" calls should bc reduced with an improvement in knowledge
transfer and dissemination.
Ci0' ofRancllo Cucamonga Deloitte
&Touche
l,gbrmation Fechnology Maxter ?lan, Drafi of Final Report Page 15 ' ~ ~l~.
Executive Summary
Priority Project 8: Evaluate and Implement Key Departmental
Projects - During focus groups and individual interviews, City staff
identified numerous information technology-related projects that
would bc beneficial to their departments. Departmental sub-projects
for further consideration are to:
, Implement Wireless Handheld Devices/Personal Digital
Assistants - for Building & Safety and Fire District field
inspectors and other personnel to exchange information on
a real-time basis with Tidemark.
, Use Information Technology to Enhance Communication -
between thc City and the public.
· Identify a Replacement Application for the Public
Works/Maintenance Division's Scantron System.
· Complete Installation of Real-Time, Online Incident
Tracking System.
· Continue the Implementation of thc Fire District's SunPro
Record Management System.
, Expand BiTcch Implementation.
Typically these information technology projects will assist
departments in completing their mission by improving service levels,
improving process flows, and reducing bottlenecks.
Priority Project 9: Optimize Use of Tidemark Functionality with
Current System Thc City expressed a strong desire to continue to
enhance its use of the Tidemark system/modules already in place. The
Tidemark Advantage software application is designed to manage real
property processing and approval functions, such as permitting,
licensing, planning, fire inspections, building and safety, and code
enforcement. Tidemark has thc capability to automate, integrate and
streamline the workflows and processes associated with these
functions. The optimization of Tidemark entails thc following sub-
projects to further these objectives:
· Use thc Existing System to Optimize Business Processes
Between Departments - Building & Safety, Planning,
Engineering, and Fire District.
· Improve Staff Knowledge of Tidemark and Monitor
Implementation of City Policies and Procedures.
· Improve Interfaces Between Tidemark and Other
Applications - to streamline processes and enhance
controls. Implementation of Tidemark features will
improve access to data for City staff, improve
('lO; of Raltc/io Cucamo~lga Deloitte
1,~,'mation Technolog? Maxte,' tYa,,. D,-~!/~ of Fi,,al Report Page/6 &Touch~ ~,
Executive Summary
communication between departments, and provide better
services to the City's constituents.
Section VIII Implementation Plan
The initial step in the implementation of this Master Plan Report is to
present the Report to the City Council for their review and
endorsement. Since community and employee input was key in the
development of this Report and its findings, it is also suggested that
staff briefings be scheduled as part of the rollout of the Master Plan
and the related Report. Once the Report is approved by the City
Council, then work on the various reconunendations in the Report can
begin.
The recommended implementation plan provides a proposed timeline
and logical sequence for the completion of the nine Priority Projects
and related sub-projects. It assumes a 24-month timeline and provides
a chart and month-to-month narrative of sub-proj ects, their timeframe,
contingencies and benefits. Factors considered in developing the
implementation plan included impact on other projects, immediate
payback and available resoumes - especially management and staff.
Certain projects or sub-projects are prerequisites for successful
completion of other sub-projects. Other projects and sub-projects can
be performed in any order, with no impact on the overall results.
There are between two and six sub-projects for each Priority Project
with a total of 33 sub-projects. The key Priority Project that will
support the overall implementation of the Information Technology
Master Plan is the adoption and implementation of an information
technology project management process. This project and all related
sub-projects should be undertaken immediately and completed before
almost any of the remaining projects are initiated.
This Master Plan is viewed as a living document that will be
changed from time to time. As implementation progresses, there will
be additional projects proposed and considered. Adjustments to
existing projects might also be necessary. These additional projects
and schedule alterations should be reviewed and endorsed by the
Technology Steering Committee. Once adopted, these will also need
to be tracked and monitored by the Steering Committee.
('it),, rf Ram'ho (.)tcamo.ga Deloitte
l,~brmation Tech~lolog), Ma.,ter t~la., Dra. t~ of FinaI Report Pa,{~e/7 &Touch~,/~d
Executive Summary
Section IX Information Technology Project Approval
and Review (IT-PAR) Process
Introduction
Information technology projects often come under scrutiny because
technology is relied upon for creating better services, establishing
reliable production, generating expected cost-savings, and providing
greater accountability. Additionally, information technology projects
often require sizable investment and create sizeable expectations.
Therefore, as cities such as Rancho Cucamonga expand their use and
investment in technology, it is very important that a management
structure be developed to oversee the projects and expectations from a
Citywide perspective.
The project was to assess how information technology projects were
initiated, approved, implemented, managed, and maintained.
Additionally, it was to ascertain whether current practices best served
the organization.
Findings
The City leadership encourages management and employees to be
innovative, creative, and entrepreneurial. Community outreach and
partnerships are greatly valued by the organization to ensure that the
community's needs and interests are represented. The City has
determined that a move toward a more formalized process for
managing information technology projects would bring the City's
efforts in this area to a higher level.
The City recognizes the importance of coordination and participation
regarding information technology and established several committees
to address this need. There are currently several major committees
involved with information technology. These committees plan, direct,
coordinate, and/or review technology-related projects. There are also
a number of working committees, which work on specific applications
and systems.
The information collected from the development of the Information
Technology Master Plan project and interviews were analyzed by the
Deloitte & Touche study team. Major issues were identified, analyzed,
and validated. The team found that most issues were related to
communications, history (past experience), informal practices, and
ownership/responsibility.
CIO,' Of RatlcJto Cucamot¥,,a Deloitte
&Touche
',~rma,ion Tech,,o,o~kry Maxte,' Plam D,'q/i of Fi,ml l.~eport Page/8 ~¢5
Executive Summary
Recommendations
Deloitte & Touche's overall conclusion is that the City is gaining
greater complexity in its IT environment and should consider greater
emphasis on internal coordination at the policy level for information
technology projects.
Based on this conclusion, Deloitte & Touche recommends that a more
formalized, streamlined, and executive management-supported review
and approval process be developed to enhance information technology
planning, management, and accountability. The following is an
overview of the recommended Information Technology Project
Approval and Review Process (IT-PAR).
· Structure:
, Reorganize thc number and function of thc information
technology related committees.
· Establish a mom formalized process for thc review,
implementation, and oversight of information technology
projects.
, Thc recommended review and approval process includes
thc City Manager, a Technology Steering Committee and a
Technical Review Group.
· Develop a project management approach for the
implementation of Information Technology related projects
to include a Department Head/Project Sponsor, Project
Manager and Information Technology Division staff.
· Roles and Responsibilities:
· Through the annual budset process, thc City Council will
consider and approve the expenditures of funds for
recommended projects and programs.
· The City Manager's primary role is decision making to
review and determine disposition of proposed projects and
to delegate the day-to-day supervision of the Technology
Steering Committee and Technical Review Group to the
Deputy City Manager.
· Thc Technology Steering Committee's primary role is to
recommend approval/disapproval of projects and to
determine on-going accountability measures.
Deloitte
Ci0' ~¢Ram'/,o Cucamo,,ga & Touche ~ - ~.
lt~fi;rmatio~l Tech~tology ~,Iaster Plan, l)rq/) of Final RtTort Page 19
Executive Summary
· The Technical Review Group's primary role is to determine
compliance with on-going accountability measures.
· A Department Head/Project Sponsor's primary role is to
develop a project proposal, support the project team, ensure
compliance, and measure results.
· A Project Manager is responsible for managing project
activities, resources, and schedule, as well as
communicating the ongoing status, issues and risks to the
Department HeadfProj ect Sponsor.
· The Information Technology Division staff provides
technical support and guidance on all projects and ongoing
maintenance.
· Operating Guidelines the management of successful
information technology projects depends on:
· Key personnel understanding the importance of information
technology policy and planning.
· Adherence to this new more formalized review and
approval process for technology projects.
· Adopting, implementing, and reporting of accountability
measures.
· Embracing a "no surprises" approach to information
technology projects.
· Expected Benefits - Specific benefits of information
technology projects should be realized in the areas off
· Accountable Project Management
· Building Relationships
· Broadening Operations Perspective
· Interfacing with the Information Technology Master Plan
X Report Conclusion
Information technology has become a cornerstone of the 21st century.
In keeping with the City's conunitment to providing quality services to
the residents, organizations, and businesses, the City has undertaken
the development of this IT Master Plan. The research and
recommendations of the Plan will build upon the technology efforts of
the past and guide the City's technology programs and projects into the
future.
('it3,' of Rare'ho Cuctlmo.ga Deloitte
&Touche
h~formation T~,c/,,,o/ogy Ma,,tcr Plan. Drq/~ of Fi,ml Report Page20 '2q7
co"r g HERE!
Background
Increasing use of Information Technology (iT)
by local government
Build on City's past accomplishments
Enhance internal and external effectiveness
Develop longer range plan (3-5 years)
Involve community and staff
Retained Deloitte & Touche to assist with Plan
Analyze areas of Information Technology
relevant to the City
Identify technology to meet internal and
external customer needs
Solicit innovative ideas from s~milar
cities
Recommend Vision and Strategic
Objectives
Recommend priority projects
Recommend technology project
oversight process
Input from Organization and Community
~ Data Gathering, interviews and Themes of the Focus
Groups
Surveys of Other Cities
Research Findings
Special Technology Considerations
Current Environment
, Statement of Vision
· Recommended Strategic Objectives
,~ Recommended Project Strategies and Priorities
Recommended Implementation Plan
Recommended IT Project Approval and Review
Process (IT-PAR)
n ogy
"The City of Rancho Cucamonga will sustain
an information technology environment that
fosters and strives to expand external access
to City services and information as well a;
enhances the business community
environment. The City will further apply
technology in its internal operations to
maximize customer service, information
sharing, and organizational productivity."
Objectives
Enhance and provide an expanded high-
level of customer serwce to the
community (residents and businesses,
organizations, schools, etc.) through the
use of technology.
Facilitate information Technology
infrastructure and technology-related
services to attract new businesses; and
retain and enable the success of ex~sting
businesses.
Provide effective Citywide technology
management processes
Utilize and leverage current
mnw~stments mn technology
Enhance support to internal users
through the use of technology
Adopt and implement information
Technology Project Approval and
Review Process
- Adopt Information Technology Project
Approval and Review Process (IT-PAR)
- Appoint Technology Steering Committee
and Technical Review Group Members
- Initiate the IT-PAR process
Expand High-Speed Internal
Infrastructure and Communications
- Complete Phase III Installation of Internal
Fiber Network
- Commence development of future phases
- Implement Internal Video Conferenc~ng
Capability through a phased process
- Provide Mobile Access to City GIS
· Develop Strategy to Mitigate Cell-phone
Blackout Area.,
· Identify needs and uses for upcoming City
facilities
Facilitate the Devel( pment of a High-
Speed Fiber Area Network
- Review Completed Studies and Develop
Consensus on Next Steps
- Build Community Support
- Facilitate Financing and Implementation
- Enact City-enabling Legislation
Develop eGovernment Strategy
- Define eGovernment for Rancho
Cucamonga
- Determine Customer Services to be
Delivered
- Identify Feedback Mechanism
Identify and Implement Interactiw~
Transactions
- Provide Selected City Forms Online
- Develop Marketing Program for City's
eGovernment Services
- Provide Online Scheduling of Inspections
and Status Checking of Permitting
Process
- Provide Online Payment Capabilities
Develop Enterprise-wide Geographmc
information Systems
- Create Organizational Structure and
Business Processes to Centrally Manage
GIS data
- Develop a Shared Data Repository that is
Available to All Departments and the
Community
- Establish Standards, Policies and Tools
for Enterprise-wide GIS
Provide Technology Training to City
Staff
- Functional Training
- Technical Training
Evaluate and Implement Key
Dc partmentai Projects
- Wireless Handheld Devices/Personal Digital
Assistants
- Enhance Communications
- Identify Replacement for the Publi( Works/
Maintenance Division's Scantron System
- Complete Real-Time, Onlim Incident Tracking
System
- Continue Implementation of the Fire District's
SunPro Record Management System
- Expand BiTech Implementation
Optimize Use of Tidemark
Functionality with Current System
- Optimize Business Processes Between
Departments
- Improve Staff Knowledge of Tidemark
- Improve Interfaces Between Tidemark and
Other Applications
Rewew and Endorse Report
BegIn Work on Plan Recommendations
- Start with Project #1 - Adopt and Implement
Information Technology Project Approval
and Review Process (IT-PAR)
- Continue with projects over the next 24
months
- Steering Committee will review progress and
adjust project timelines as needed
- The Plan is a living document
and Process
(IT-PAR)
Establishes process for review and
implementation of IT projects
Intended to coordinate and facilitate
Recommendations will be reflected in
the Annual Budget process
Key ParticIpants
IT!
here!
information Technology
Master Plan Report
&Touche
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: November 20,2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Director
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW BOARD MEMBERS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub-
Committee's recommendations for appointment of new Board members.
BACKGROUND
The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation currently has four vacancies on
the Board: two due to elapsed terms of Directors and two due to a recent passage of
a bylaws change to the organization, increasing the number of Board members from
9to 11.
The Library Sub-Committee, at their meeting on October 16th, interviewed interested
candidates and recommends the following names for appointment to the vacant
seats:
Teresa Akahoshi
Stefani Carrasco
Ruth Leal
Wanda Mitchell
F~espegffully submitted, ,~
Deborah Kaye Clark
Library Director
TH ~ C I T ¥ 0 F
I~AN C H 0 CIICAH 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council ~/ j
Jack Lam, AICP,/'~~ City Manag.ef'~ ~~'''
FROM: Bill Alexander, M~tC6r /~
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION ~ RECOMMENDATION TO REAPPOINT LARRY
MCNIEL, PAM STEWART, AND PETER TOLSTOY TO THE HISTORIC
PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the reappointment of Larry McNiel,
Pam Stewart, and Peter Tolstoy to serve an additional term on the Historic Preservation
and Planning Commissions.
BACKGROUND
The terms of office for Historic Preservation and Planning Commissioners McNiel,
Stewart, and Tolstoy have expired. Each of the Commissioners has indicated their
desire to continue to serve on the Commissions. As these Commissioners have worked
intricately on several very large projects that are still ongoing, such as the
implementation of the General Plan Update, the Regional Mall, and the Foothill
Boulevard Implementation Plan, I recommend that they be reappointed to new terms to
carry on the vision.
WA:gs
TH E CITY OF
I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA
Memorandum
DATE: November 12, 2002 ~-. ^ ,~ _
TO: Members of Ci~ 'I.~
FROM: Bill Alexande~ /,~V
SUBJECT: POLICY REGAR~MMISSIONS
In order to be sure that the y~irious City Commissions have developed leadership and
individuals with well-rounded experience in conducting City business, I believe it is
important for the City Council to establish a policy that the Chairmanships of
Commissions be rotated. Therefore, I suggest the following policy memo be forwarded
to all Commissioners and that this rotation begin starting with the next regularly
scheduled Commission election following January 1,2003.
The City Council acknowledges the hard work that our Commissioners
perform in their voluntary positions. In order to be sure that the
Commissions have depth of knowledge and leadership experience, the
Council wishes to establish a policy that the Commissions rotate their
Chairmanships. Further, the same individual should not hold the position
of Chairman for more than three years in a row.
cc: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
T H E C I I Y 0 F
1QAN C 11 0 CUCAMONGA
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: PRJ2002--00172 A REQUEST TO SUPPORT CONCEPTUAL AREA
PROTECTION PLAN FOR THE ETIWANDA NORTH PRESERVE
AUGMENTATION AREA BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND
GAME
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign~ a letter on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Council in support of a Conceptual Area Protection Plan for the Etiwanda
North Preserve Augmentation Area by minute action.
BACKGROUND: A Conceptual Area Protection Plan (CAPP) is a California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG), long-term planning document. It is also a grant request and project
proposal. CAPPs are generally prepared by CDFG staff and submitted to the Land and
Facilities Branch for review and approval. They may also be submitted by private organizations
or local government agencies. Outside entities must, however, work with regional CDFG staff,
as the report follows a strict format. There are also rigorous, content and confidentiality
requirements.
CAPPs should not be confused with Habitat Conservation Plans that are required by the
Endangered Species Act when a landowner seeks an Incidental Take Permit. It is not a quid
pro quo. Rather, a CAPP is simply an articulation of a vision - a conceptualized plan for a
broad, undeveloped area with biologically significant conservation values and multiple property
owners. Although it is conceptual in nature, a CAPP can lead to concrete results.
A CAPP is evaluated and scored based upon predetermined evaluation criteria. These criteria
are: 1 ) significance of resource; 2) support; 3/management plan and long-term viability; and 4)
conformance with CDFG's strategic plan and NCCP Guidelines. Once CDFG's Lands
Committee and Directorate have approved a CAPP, it is added to the Wildlife Conservation
Board's list of approved projects and a lands agent is assigned. The lands agent works with the
local entity to negotiate a suitable price and to ensure that a conservation easement is granted
to the department. In this case, CDFG is proposing to acquire the property in fee title and may
manage and regulate it as an "Ecological Reserve".
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PR J2002-00172 - CAPP/ETIWANDA NORTH PRESERVATION AUGMENTATION AREA
November 20, 2002
Page 2
Chronology of CAPP efforts for the Etiwanda North Preserve Augmentation Area is as follows:
· April 2001 - Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division submitted a draft CAPP for the
City's Sphere of Influence. No response was received from the CDFG.
· April 2002 ~ Mr. Frank Schiavone, a Rancho Cucamonga resident and naturalist
supporter, submitted an updated CAPP request to the CDFG.
· June 11, 2002 - Mr. Schiavone requested, by letter, support from Mayor Alexander. In
a subsequent meeting with the Mayor, staff, and Mr. Schiavone, the CAPP efforts were
discussed. Mayor Alexander requested staff to place the question of City support for
the CAPP on the City Council Agenda at an appropriate time.
· October 2002 - Mr. Schiavone informed the City that the CDFG Staff were going to
pursue the CAPP adjacent to the Etiwanda North Preserve as a State request. If
approved, the CAPP will become a CDFG project, which they will implement.
· November 2002 - Mr. Frank Schiavone requested the City endorse the CDFG's efforts
to create a CAPP for the Etiwanda North Area, since the matter is scheduled for review
by the CDFG's Lands Committee and Directorate in December 2002.
Additional support background materials are attached for information purposes.
Conclusion: The support of the proposed CAPP will lead to the acquisition of parcels owned by
voluntary sellers to fill in the gaps between existing mitigation/conservation properties and the
Etiwanda North Preserve. This action is in full support of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
Open Space/Conservation Goals.
Bred Buller
City Planner
BB:LH/ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Resident dated June 11, 2002
Exhibit "B" - Wildlife Conservation Board Information
RA~HO CU(.
JUN
Honorable William J. Alexander, Mayor'
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Subject: Proposed Conceptual Area Protection Plan (CAPP) for San Gabriel Fan
Dear Mayor Alexander,
Every day we see signs of growth and development in our region. We watch as
thousands of acres are cleared for development, as new and bigger highways and roads
are built to accommodate increasing numbers of people, and as prices for land and
property continue a sharp and steady escalation.
In troth, the question before our commurfity is not/fwe will grow, but how.'
I believe it is possible to balance the needs of development and economic growth with the
preservation of easential natural resources. Rancho has demonstrated vision and
insightful leadership related to growth and I am encouraged by the City's participation in
the North Etiwanda Open Space and Habitat Preservation Program and OS-1 Special
District (North Etiwanda Open Space) Committee. The City has also submitted a
DRAFT Conceptual Area Protection Plan (CAPP) t? the Department of Fish and Game
seeking the permanent protection of roughly 3300 acres of sensitive lands on the San
Gabriel Fan. This document is significant because it can lead to grants or critical
acquisitions. Briefly, if the planning area described in the CAPP is approved it
essentially becomes a CDFG project eligible for Land Acquisition Program funds
(administered and distributed through the Wildlife Conservation Board).
I applaud these efforts and would like to help. I have prepared and submitted a DRAFT
Conceptual Area Protection Plan for North Etiwanda that builds upon the work already
completed by Larry Henderson of your staff. As the CAPP is a CDFG planning
document with a prescribed format, my purpose is to supplement the City's report with
additional biological data and supply the content CDFG requires. Further, since the
proposed plan is conceptual in nature it will ultimately require additional development.
Mr. Henderson has been provided a copy of the report.
I hope to accomplish the following:
n Seek funding for potential acquisitions of sensitive lands
Offer an alternative approach to the Valley-species Plan which is foundering
Foster a non-combative, collaborative effort
n Expand the North Etiwanda Reserve (acquired as mitigation for the 30 Freeway)
For your information, I have also prepared a CAPP for North Claremont that was
approved on May 10, 2002. The planning areas described in the North Claremont and
North Etiwanda CAPPs are separated by less than one and half miles with landscape
linkage through the National Forest. I have also proposed a CAPP for Lytle Creek. The
three areas if protected and combined would result in a substantial east-wast corridor and
would contain significant representations of the ve~ threatened natural communities that
are present in our region (i.e., alluvial sage scrub, oak woodlands, and walnut
woodlands).
CAPPs could also be prepared for the various other "study units" identified by the San
Bernardino County Museum (Valley Plan Technical Lead) such as the Santa Aha
River/Wash. I want to emphasize that CAPPs should not be viewed as competing "sub-
regional" plans. Rather, they should be viewed as essential components (building blocks)
in a much larger vision for the region. Moreover, since these focal areas have potential
landscape linkages with one another we are laying the groundwork for a comprehensive,
regional reserve system. The difference being is that we are taking an incremental
approach to conservation planning instead of a sweeping, all-inclusive plan that no one
can seem to agree upon. Please also recognize that an approved CAPP does mean that
the planning area is protected or that the conservation of any particular parcel is assured.
It is just a beginrfing point.
Mayor, I need your support and your help. I am also hoping you can solicit the support
of State Senator Jim Bmlte. I believe~with all my heart that working together we can all
leave a lasting legacy that we can be very proud of- our contribution to the future. I
believe that the conservation of living systems enriches us by uplifting the human spirit,
protecting valuable watershed, and filtering the air we breathe. By perpetuating the
fullness of our natural heritage, we benefit ourselves. I seek to conserve our natural areas
not jnst for wildlife but for people as well. My hope is that we can create a network of
lands (possibly modeled after the Claremont Wilderness Park) that can be enjoyed by
hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians while, at the same time, allowing God's creation to
endure.
I would like to discuss this vision with you further. If you have any questions or would
like a briefing, please call me at (323) 869-3733 or at home at (909) 987-6805.
8060 Crestview Court
Alta Loma, California 91701
Email: fschiavo®childsupport.co.la.ca.us
c Larry Henderson
2
Re§oumes Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board Page 1 of 5
Resources Agency
Department of Fish and Game
Wildlife Conservation Board
Michael Chrisman,Chairman
President, Fish and Game Commission
C g B. Timothy Gage, Member
Department of Finance
~-"'--- :- oard Robert c. Hight, Member
Department of Fish and Game
A1 Wright, Executive Director
1807 13th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Legislative Interim Advisory Committee
Senator Byron Sher Assembly Member Howard Wayne
Assembly Member Virginia Strom-
Senator Jack O'Connell Martin
Senator Sheila Kuehl
Wildlife Conservation Board Meetings for 2001
Friday, February 23rd- 10:00 AM Thursday, August 30th - 10:00 AM
Agenda ,~
Friday, May 18th - 10:00 AM Wednesday, November 28th - 10:00
Location: State Capitol, room to be announced.
BRIEF OVERVIEW
The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by legislation in 1947 to administer a capital outlay
program for wildlife conservation and related public recreation. Originally created within the California
Department of Natural Resources, and later placed with the Department of Fish and Game, the WCB is a
separate and independent Board with authority and funding to car~ out an acquisition and development
program for wildlife conservation (California Fish and Game Code 1300, et seq.). The Board consists of the
President of the Fish and Game Commission, the Director of the Department of Fish and Game and the
Director of the Department of Finance. Legislation that created the Board also established a Legislative
Advisory Committee consisting of three members of the Senate and three members of the Assembly, which
meet with the Board, providing legislative oversight.
The primary responsibilities of the Board are to select, authorize and allocate funds for the purchase of land
and waters suitable for recreation purposes and the preservation, protection and restoration of wildlife
habitat. The Board approves and funds projects that set aside lands within the State for such purposes,
through acquisition or other means, to meet these objectives. The Board can also authorize the construction
of facilities for recreational purposes on property in which it has a proprietary interest.
FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAMS
httm//www.df~,.ca. ~,ov/wcb/index.html 2/27/01
Re,soumes Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board Page 2 of 5
The Wildlife Conservation Board's three main functions are land acquisition, habitat restoration and
development of wildlife oriented public access facilities. These activities are carded out under the following
seven programs:
Land Acquisition Program
Public Access Program
Habitat Enhancement and Restoration Program (Generai) ~,
Inland Wetlands Conservation Program (IWCP)
California Riparian Habitat Conservation Program (CRHCP)
Land Conservation Matching Grants Program (Matching Grant Program)
Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit Program (Tax Credit Program)
A report of some of the activities for the 1999-2000 fiscal year was presented in the Depamnent offish and
Game's full-color publication, OUTDOOR CALIFORNIA, and is also presented here. Low Resolution High
Resolution Both are .pdf files that require the Adobe Acrobat Reader.~~
Land Acquisition Program
The acquisition program is administered pursuant to the Board's original enabling legislation, "The Wildlife
Conservation Law of 1947" (Fish and Game Section 1300, et seq.) and land acquisition is a component of ail
WCB programs. The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) acquires real property or rights in real property on
behalf of the Department of Fish and Game and can also grant funds to other governmental entities or
nonprofit organizations to acquire real property or rights in real property. All acquisitions are made on a
"willing seller" basis pursuant to a fair market value appraisal as approved by the Department of General
Services (DGS). The acquisition activities are carried out in conjunction with the Department offish and
Game (DFG), with the DFG recommending priorities for proposed acquisitions. Following the DFG site
evaluations, recommendations are submitted to the WCB for consideration for funding. Information on the
evaiuation process is available through any of the DFG Regional offices listed below.
Public Access Program
The public access activities are also carded out pursuant to The Wildlife Conservation Law of 1947. Public
access development is generally carried out with the assistance of local governments, with all projects having
the purposes of providing "wildlife-oriented" public access opportunities. Public access activities include
acquisition of land for public access as well as development of lands to provide public access. Typically, a
local government sponsor assumes the operation and maintenance for the project improvements which may
be located on Department-owned or other lands, where cooperative agreements will provide for continued
protection of the project areas. Project improvements have included fishing piers, boat launching ramps and
trails for fish and hunting access, or for just observing and enjoying plants and wildlife in a natural setting.
Habitat Enhancement and Restoration Program (General)
ht**~.ll, ........ .,Ifa va r,n,.,l~,tr'hllncl~'t html 2.J27/01
R~soumes Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board Page 3 of 5
Funds were made available to WCB for the enhancement and restoration of a variety of habitat types through
the Habitat Conservation Fund, the General Fund, the Wildlife Restoration Fund through the Safe
Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. In addition to
wetland and riparian habitat, funds are available for the enhancement and restoration of:
Threatened and Endangered Species Habitats;
Forest Land Habitat; and for
Salton Sea Restoration Projects.
Eligible enhancement and restoration projects must provide for the long-term maintenance of the restored
and/or enhanced habitat. Eligible applicants for restoration projects include nonprofit conservation
organizations and federal, state or local governmental agencies. Habitat enhancement and restoration
projects, like the acquisition and public access projects, are carded out pursuant to recommendations from
the DFG. Restoration and public access projects may be located on Department-owned or other lands.
Inland Wetlands Conservation Program
The Inland Wetlands Conservation Program (IWCP) was created by legislation and became effective January
1, 1991 (Chapter 1645, Statues of 1990/Fish and Game Code 1400, et seq.). IWCP was created to support
and complement the efforts of the Central Valley Habitat Joint Venture (CVHJV), which is a component of
the North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP). The NAWMP is an international effort to
restore waterfowl and other migratory bird populations by protecting and restoring wetland habitat from the
Gulf of Mexico to the Canadian Arctic. During the mid-70's, an agreement between Canada, Mexico and the
United States was developed to provide a blueprint for restqripg continental waterfowl populations. The
pardes recognized that regional administration would be needed to implement the guiding principles, and the
CVHIV was established. The ultimate goal of the CVHJV program is to protect, maintain and restore
wetland habitat to increase waterfowl populations in the Central Valley of Caiifomia. California's Central
Valley extends approximately 400 miles from Red Bluff in the north to Bakersfield in the south. Eligible
projects include wetland habitat acquisitions, as well as wetland habitat enhancements and restorations.
Enhancement and restoration projects can be carded out on public or private lands. Eligible grant applicants
include nonprofit organizations, special districts and state and local governments.
California Riparian Habitat Conservation Program
The California Riparian Habitat Conservation Program (CRHCP) was created by legislation and became
effective January 1, 1992 (Chapter 762, Statutes 1991/Fish and Game Code Section 1385, et seq.). The goals
of the CRHCP are to protect, preserve, restore and enhance riparian habitat throughout California. Eligible
projects include riparian habitat acquisitions, as well as riparian habitat enhancements and restorations.
Enhancement and restoration projects can be carded out on public or private lands. Eligible grant applicants
include nonprofit organizations, special districts and federal, state and local governments. Typical projects
include bank stabilization, conversion of flood plain agricultural crops to riparian vegetation, fencing riparian
corridors to control and manage livestock, removal of exotic plant species and planting of native riparian
habitat. "
Land Conservation Matching Grants Program
.Z57
Rasources Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board Page 4 of 5
The Land Conservation Matching Grants Program (Matching Grants Program) was established by the 2000-
01 California State Budget specifically for acquisition and restoration for habitat or open space throughout
the State of California. Grants may be made to governmental agencies and private entities, as long as the
non-state source match requirement is met, provided, however, that priority shall be given to private
matching contributions. All restoration project proposals must include provisions for long-term maintenance
of the restored and/or enhanced project area and all acquisitions require in perpetuity protection of the
proposed acquisition area.
Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit Program
The Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit Program (Tax Credit Program) was established by legislation
in 2000 (Chapter 113, Statutes of 2000). This legislation requires the WCB to implement a program under
which tax credits may be given in exchange for certain property being donated to the state, local government
or a nonprofit organization for the protection of wildlife habitat, open space and agricultural lands.
Department of Fish and Game Regional Offices:
Northern Califomia-No~th Coast Region Sacramento Valley-Central Sierra Region
Region 1 Headquarters Region 2 Headquarters
601 Locust Street 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Redding, California 96001 Rancho Cordova, California 95670
(530) 225-2300 (916) 358-2900
Central Coast Region San Joaquin Valley-Southern Sierra Region
Region 3 Headquarters Region 4 Headquarters
7329 Silverado Trail 1234 E. Shaw Avenue
Napa, California 94558 Fresno, California 93710
(707) 944-5500 (559) 243-4005 XI51
South Coast Region Eastern Sierra - Inland Deserts Region
Region 5 Headquarters Region 6 Headquarters
4949 View Ridge Avenue 330 Golden Shore, Suite 250
San Diego, California 92123 Long Beach, CA 90802
(858) 467-4201 (562)590-5126
For inquiries relative to the evaluation process, contact the DFG regional office closest to the proposed
project area.
For information on any of the WCB activities, please contact the Wildlife Conservation Board office:
Wildlife Conservation Board
1807 13th Street, Suite 103
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 445-8448
(916) 323-0280 (FAX)
httn-I/,u,u~u ttfo oa o~n'~lx,~ehlinclt~x htrnl 2/27101
Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Wildlife Conservation Board Page 5 of 5
httn.llwtuw dfo ca c,nv/we.h/inde, x.html 2/27/01
~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
CO~IUN1TY ~EI~VICE~
Staff Report
DATE: November 20, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the
Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Day Creek Park (Previously Rancho Etiwanda Park):
· The restroom building is approximately 90% complete. Tennis Court fencing and wind
screening is scheduled for installation. Contractor is looking for topsoil to set the finish
grade for the site.
South Etiwanda Park:
· Landscape Amhitect is working on conceptual design plans.
Central Park:
· The project was presented to the Design Review Committee (DRC) on November 5th and
received the Committee's approval and recommendation to proceed to the Planning
Commission on December 11, 2002.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
East Beryl Park:
· Tot Lot and vehicular barrier walls are approximately 95% complete. The restroom is
approximately 90% complete. Perimeter walkways are being installed.
Red Hill Park:
· The trash enclosure project is complete with installation of chain link roof panels by Fence
Craft. Enclosures are now able to house multiple bins and are secured to prevent dumping
of unwanted refuse.
Sports Complex:
· Work began on the handicapped ramps to the softball fields with clearing and grubbing.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
· The Senior Center will offer a free full Thanks.qivin.q Dinner and Pro.qram on Thanksgiving
Day, Thursday, November 28th at noon for seniors on a reservation basis only. Seating will
be limited to 150.
· The Senior Center has recently arranged a new service of 15 weekly and monthly free
subscriptions to a variety of popular magazines. In cooperation with EDSCO INDUSTRIES,
INC, two local sponsors provide these magazines and two display racks each month at no
cost to the Senior Center. The magazines that are available for the reading pleasure of the
seniors include: Ladies Home Journal, New Yorke[, Rosie, US News and World Report,
Better Homes and Gardens, Fitness, Health, Latina, Popular Science, Premiere, Prevention,,
Body and Soul, Bon Appetit, Ebony, and ESPN Ma.qazine. The magazines are located in
the lobby and the Thompson room.
· Sparked by the enormously popular Antiques Road Show, the new Collectors Club at the
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center has taken off like wildfire. The Club meets on the third
Wednesday of every month at 3:30 p.m. Club members will have the opportunity to sham
information and their collections with one another, learn about reseamhing, purchasing,
preserving, and restoring collectables from occasional guest speakers and socialize with
others that have similar interests.
· The Senior Advisory Committee will meet on Monday, November 25, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. at
the Senior Center. The Committee does not hold a regular meeting in December.
· The Senior Center is introducing beginning Ballroom Dance lessons each Thursday,
beginning November 7th. Beginning "Ballroom Dance" will cover the basic steps in Rumba,
Cha-Cha, Mambo, Fox Trot, West Coast Swing, Waltz, Samba and Tango. Dances will be
taught for one month. A partner is not required. Cost: $8.00 per month.
· The Senior Center will host a free festive Holiday Party on Thursday, December 19th.
Elaborate decorations, refreshments, and special holiday entertainment featuring the
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
fabulous Joanne and George Carr performing a special Christmas program.
· A New Year's Bash will be presented by the Senior Center on Tuesday, December 31st and
will feature the incredible Saleena Gaba in concert. The celebration will offer festive
decorations, plenty of refreshments, balloons, hats, music, and noisemakers to go along
with the cheer.
Human Services:
· Medication Manaqement - The University of La Verne will conduct a free educational
program on "Medication Management" on Wednesday, November 6, 2002 at 12:30 p.m. at
the Senior Center. Registration is required. They will discuss issues in medication
management, how to avoid harmful medicine interactions and the side effects involved.
Participants will also have the opportunity to take part in a research study on medication
behavior.
· Senior Information Assistance - The Department of Aging and Adult Services will be
available the Ist Monday of each month from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. to answer questions on
various items, such as housing issues, renters rebate and assistances with filling out forms.
No appointment is necessary.
· AqeWise - An outreach program for healthy aging. The goal of the AgeWise program is to
provide free in-home counseling to older adults to help maintain the best possible physical
and mental health. Services include: senior peer counseling, support groups and
educational classes. For more information call 1 800 451-5633. Monday - Friday, 8:00
a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
· 55 Alive Drivin.q Class - Classes are offered every first Tuesday and Wednesday of the
month. Times alternate. Drivers retraining course developed by AARP offers discount
insurance certificates upon completion. Cost is: $10.00 per person and appointments are
necessary.
· Senior Transportation Pro.qram - During the months of July, August and September 730
rides were made bringing/picking up seniors to and from the Senior Center. Seniors without
transportation can call the YMCA office the day ahead to make reservations. The City and
the Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana Family YMCA jointly sponsor this program.
· Adopt-A-Child for Christmas - Senior Center staff, volunteers and patrons will be donating
Christmas gifts to children from the Foothill Family Shelter during the holidays. The shelter
will be having their Christmas party the second week in December where the Center will join
in the festivities and meet the children.
· Commodity Distribution - On the first Monday of every month USDA surplus food that is
provided by the County Food Bank is distributed by volunteers and staff to Iow income
residents of Rancho Cucamonga on a first come first serve basis at the Senior Center. The
distribution runs from 1:30 p.m. until 3:30 p.m.; or until supplies run out. Participants are
required to bring proof of residency and income to qualify.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
Trips and Tours:
· Rose Parade, January 1, 2003. Enjoy the world famous Rose Parade from premium
grandstand seats along Colorado Blvd.
· Palm Sprin,qs Follies, January 25, 2003. Flying Down to Rio! The fabulous Palm Springs
Follies is a three-hour razzle-dazzle, song and dance vaudeville-style extravaganza
showcasing the music and dance of the 30's and 40's. Each cast member is 55 to 88 years
of age. Don't miss this incredible show.
· Murder Mystery Dinner Theater, February 8, 2003. Embark on an evening train ride with an
excellent dinner, hearty laughs and some less-than-serious sleuthing. Enjoy a first-class,
full-course dinner, served while actors commit mirth and murder. Jump right in and help
solve the murder, or simply sit back, be waited on and enjoy the show.
Volunteer Services:
· Over the next several weeks staff will be recruiting and placing volunteers for the following
events:
o Preparations for the Senior Craft Fair
o Thanksgiving Dinner at the Senior Center
o Tree Lighting Ceremony
o Breakfast with Santa
· 'l'he table below summarizes Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the
month of September 2002 and year to date.
Month: September 2002 YEAR TO DATE
~of ~of
Volunteers # of Hours ; Value* Volunteers # of Hours $ Value*
Admin ~ 15 21 (; 51 153 2,14.~
Sports 382 3,875 54,25(; 2,432 25,123 365,72;
Sr & Human 5~ 231 3,23z~ 48~c 3,097 43,35~
Services
Special 1 ~ 437 6,11 ~ 253 2,851 39,91 z
Events
Youth 23 165 2,31 £ 992 6,972 97,608
Programs
Total I 4811 4,7231 66,1221 4,2171 39,1961 488,010
· Based on $14.00/hour.
Teens:
· Teen Center. During the month of October through mid-November, 1,040 youngsters
attended the Teen Center.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
· The Teen Center Homework Room. During the month of October through mid-November
146 youngsters used the homework room.
· Usage of the skate facility during the month of October is estimated at 985 skaters. Staff is
still making regular weekly visits to the skate park to promote safe skating by handing out
donated chips and beverages free to the youth wearing their proper gear.
· Over 40 TRAC teens participate in our monthly meetings during October. Total number of
TRAC members participating in City programs from October through mid-November was 46
youth.
· The Teens had two big events this month. October 17th was the annual College Fair. This
year we had 60 colleges attend with over 2,700 youngsters attending the fair to speak to the
college representatives. The Teen Monster Bash Dance was held on Saturday, October
26th. Staff estimates over 310 youth attended the dance and had a spooktaculartime.
Youth Activities:
· Our Playschool Classes are filling up quickly for our fall session. Currently we have over
625 youngsters registered into classes at our four locations.
· The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is going strong. The program served over
750 youth for the period of October through mid-November. During the fall, the Recreation
Unit visits the following park sites:
Weekday Park Location Program Time
Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 - 5:00 Dm
Tuesday Old Town Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Wednesday Hermosa Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Thursday Mountain View Park 2:30 - 5:00 Dm
Friday Windrows Park 2:30 - 5:00 Dm
Grants:
· The Teen Connection - Staff visited all four of our local high schools during the month of
October and met with 1,570 students. The table below illustrates the schedule for visits and
details the number of students that staff met with during the month of October.
: Weekday High School Students Served During
October 2002
Monday Los Oso High School 220
Tuesday Etiwanda High School 400
Wednesday Rancho Cucamonga High School 600
Thursday Alta Loma High School 350
· Youth Enrichment Services (YES) attendance is increasing at both the Mulberry Learning
Center and the Lions East Center. For the period of October through the mid-November,
1,488 community members visited the Lions East FACTS Center and 1,348 visited the
Mulberry FACTS Center. For the same period an estimated 195 parents attended our
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
parent education classes. Staff has also performed over 25 car safety inspections for
parents during the reporting period.
Contract Classes:
,, Contract Classes - Currently we have over 2,469 participants registered into our contract
classes for the fall session. By the end of November, it is estimated that over 4,100 will
register for activities in our fall contract classes program.
Youth Sports:
· The Sports Advisory Committee met on November 13th and ratified staff's spring/summer
field allocation proposal for 2003 (February 1 through July 31, 2003).
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Basketball 244 3-5/boys & girls 24
Youth Volleyball 45 8-13/boys & girls 6
Youth Roller Hockey 168 6-15/boys & girls 20
Youth Flag Football 210 6-15/boys & girls 18
Basketball Bash 50 8-13/boys & girls N/A
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting
period:
Activity I # of Participants
Adult Basketball 436
Youth Basketball 452
Adult Racquetball 371
Youth Racquetball 54
Adult Volleyball 44
Youth Volleyball 273
Jazzercise 1,075
· The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Adult Racquetball 18 Adult/Males N/A
Adult Basketball (full court) 70 Adult/Males 7
Adult Basketball (3-on-3) 40 Adult/Males 8
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
Adult Sports:
· Five adult softball tournaments will take place at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex
during the month of November. In addition, two adult tournaments are scheduled for Red Hill
Community Park and one at Old Town Park for the same reporting period.
· Thirty-four adults are participating in our tennis leagues this fall.
· The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period:
Activity if of Participants if Teams Gender
Softball 2,720 170 Male/Female
Soccer 704 44 Male/Female
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sport fields for non-profit organized youth sport leagues. For the reporting period,
11 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 226,038 participants and
spectators enjoying our parks during both practices and game times.
Community Wide Special Events:
· The Founders Day Parade and Celebration was held on Saturday, November 9th. Despite
the rain the community was able to see a fantastic parade including innovative and colorful
floats, large inflatables and lots of bands. The Celebration was scaled back and was moved
due to the rain to Alta Loma High School. Community members and parade participants still
had the opportunity to enjoy a piece of the City's anniversary cake that was generously
donated by HomeTown Buffet. The parade kicked off the City's 25th anniversary celebration
and featured the theme, Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence.
· Annual Tree Li.qhtinq and Holiday Celebration - The Community Services Department in
collaboration with Lewis Retail Centers are planning a holiday tree lighting ceremony for the
residents of Rancho Cucamonga. On Thursday, November 21st at 5:30 p.m. in the Terra
Vista Town Center Food Court, we will be bringing holiday cheer to all. The evening will
consist of local entertainment, a visit from Santa and Mrs. Clause and much more holiday
excitement.
Parks and Facilities:
· The table below and on the following page provides information on park/special use facility
reservations for the month of October 2002:
Location Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications Processed of
Rentals
Red Hill 2,957 36 48 180
Community Park
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
Location Attendance Number of Applications Number Hours of Use
Processed of
Rentals
Heritage Community 1,055 19 22 99
Park
Hermosa Park 353 12 14 51
Milliken Park 1,440* 14 18 68
Coyote Canyon Park 255 8 11 32
Civic Center 225 1 1 9
Courtyard
Amphitheater 380 4 4 21
Equestrian Center 420** 7 7 470
Total 7,085 101 125 508
Milliken Park had a .~ )ecial event through Lewis Homes this month with an attendance of
1,000.
** The Equestrian Center had an outside user group show (Llama Association of Southern
California) during the month of October with an estimated attendance of 100.
Heritage Park Equestrian Center;
· Equestrian Center usaqe for the months of November 2002 and December 2002 is shown in
the table below and on the next page:
Group Date Event/Time Frame
Alta Loma Riding Club November 7m Board Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:30p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club November 17t~ Horse Show/9:00a.m.-4:00p.m.
4-H Club November 18tn General Meetingf7:00p.m.-9:00p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club December 5t" Board Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:30 p.m.
Rising Stars of December 8~n Annual Christmas Show/8:00a.m.- 5:00p.m.
Equestrian Therapy
4-H Club December 13tn Christmas Party/6:00p.m.-9:00p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club December 15tn Playday/8:00a.m.-4:00p.m.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on November 21,
2002. At this meeting the Commission discuss/act upon the following items:
> Senior Advisory Committee update.
> Sports Advisory Committee update.
> Update on proposed Central Park project.
> Update on proposed Cultural Center project.
> Qu. arterly update on the marketing activities for the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter.
> Discussion regarding the National Recreation and Park Association 2002 Congress
and Exposition held on October 15-19, 2002.
> Consideration of 2003 Spring/Summer youth sports groups field allocation proposal.
> Community Development Block Grant Request For Proposals
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
November 20, 2002
Annual review of Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating
to recreation activities, programs and services.
Review of proposed design for Victoria Arbors Park.
Discussion regarding community sports groups fee policies.
Consideration of a waiver of the December 19th regular Park and Recreation
Commission meeting.
> Request to discuss the need for youth softball complex (Jim Pulver - ACE/RC
Softball).
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· The following items were discussed at the Foundation's November 12, 2002 meetin,q:
Update on Cultural Center project.
Consideration of additional board prospects.
Consideration of a waiver for the Foundation's December 10th meeting.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
· In preparation of the 2003 Quakes baseball season, the Epicenter field is down for
renovation between now and February 2003. The field renovation will, of course, limit staff's
ability to rent the facility during this time frame.
· Staff is in the process of developing a 5-minute Epicenter marketin.q video of the facility.
This piece will provide potential users/renters of the facility with an up close look at all of the
amenities that the facility has to offer. Copies of the video will be available in both CD and
VHS format and will also be loading onto the Epicenter's website.
· Staff is working to audit and refine the Epicenter website to enhance its user friendliness.
· Staff is in the process of developing marketinq packets for the Epicenter to be sent to
potential film producers and other rental opportunities.
Respe! ,fully submitted,
Kevin~ cArdle 'Nell
Comm~ ~ity Services Director City Engineer
htCOMMSERV~Council&BoardstCityCouncil~StaffReports[20021update11.20. O2. doc