The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999/03/17 - Agenda Packet"~i~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander , Biane .... Curatalo , Dutton ___ and Williams __ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a cash donation to the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA from the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters and Police Officers. 2. Presentation of Certificates to Julia Wang and Kyle Jones for their participation in the Library Video "Our Favorite Place." C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: February 17, 1999 March 3, 1999 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/24/99 and 3/3/99 and 1 Payroll ending 2/18/99, for the total amount of $2,389,011.87. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 12 February 28, 1999. 4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and 17 Wine for Rocky's Pizza, Hong Hyo Sook & Hong Sung Kee, 9615 Foothill Blvd. ~"~"~j~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 2 5. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and 19 Wine for Steer N Stein, Antonio Narcisco, Jr., Steven Vanzant, and Manuel Costa, 8348 Archibald. 6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" 21 for the 1998/99 ADA Access Ramps and Driveways Project to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards generally located along Archibald Avenue from 6th Street to north of Base Line Rd., to be funded from Account Nos. 16-4637-9106, 10-4637-9804 and 32-4637-9804. RESOLUTION NO. 99-050 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "1998/99 ADA ACCESS RAMPS AND DRIVEWAYS CONSTRUCTION" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 7. Approval to accept the Redevelopment Agency's conveyance of 27 real properties located at 7368 Archibald (Rancho Cucamonga Public Library), and 10.75 acres south of Foothill and east of Rochester (Sports Complex Expansion Parking Lot). RESOLUTION NO. 99-051 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING EXCESS REMNANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7368 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 99-052 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING EXCESS REMNANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL AND EAST OF ROCHESTER (SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION PARKING LOT) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~';~~~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 3 8. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City 30 records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090 and the City's Records Retention Schedule. RESOLUTION NO. 99-053 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES 9. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho 40 Cucamonga, authorizing the City to obtain State Summary Criminal History information to expedite process of employment background investigations. RESOLUTION NO. 99-054 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO OBTAIN STATE SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION TO EXPEDITE PROCESS OF EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS 10. Approval to purchase one replacement Chevrolet Astro Van from 42 Good Chevrolet of Alameda, California, through the State of California, Department of General Services, Procurement Division, 1999 Contract #1-99-23-20, in the amount of $20,476.82, to be funded from Account #72-4245-7045. 43 11. Approval to purchase ten (10) replacement Chevrolet Blazers and one (1) Chevy Express Passenger Van from Crest Chevrolet of San Bernardino, California, through a piggyback purchase agreement with the County of San Bernardino in the amount of $253,986.21, to be funded from Account #'72-4245-7045. 44 12. Approval to purchase one (1) Chevrolet Astro Van from Good Chevrolet of Alameda, California, through the State of California, Department of General Services, Procurement Division, 1999 Contract #1-99-23-20, in the amount of $20,853.94, to be funded from Account #141-4451-7045. '~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 4 13. Approval to purchase one (1) GMC Safari Cargo Van from Lahser 45 GMC/Dodge of Woodland, California, through the State of California, Department of General Services, Procurement Division, 1999 Contract #1-99-23-20, in the amount of $18,700.46, to be funded from Account #141-4451-7045. 14. Approval of authorization for replacement purchase of four trucks 46 from Hemborg Ford of Norco, California, in the amount of $153,977.57 and one from Fairway Ford Sales, Inc., of Placentia, California, in the amount of $46,009.25, funded from Fund 72- 4225-7045. 15. Approval to accept offer of dedication of Lot "A" of Tract No. 13062 47 and forward the documents to the State of California (CALTRANS) for the construction of SR 30 Freeway. RESOLUTION NO. 99-055 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROADS 16. Approval of a drainage acceptance agreement for CUP 97-09, 50 Bear Gulch, LLC, located at the southeast corner of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 99-056 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR BEAR GULCH, LLC 54 17. Approval of a Resolution of Intention to Vacate portions of two alleys, generally within the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue and setting the date of the public hearing for April 7, t999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-057 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE PORTIONS OF ALLEYS GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 5 18. Approval to order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance 60 District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 98-32, located on the south side of Arrow Route east of the 1-15 Freeway, submitted by USL Parallel Products of California. RESOLUTION NO. 99-058 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 98-32 (APN: 229-121- 10) 19. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the 65 Engineer's reports and setting of Public Hearing for May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 99-059 68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990/00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-060 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. 72 20. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's report and setting of the Public Hearing for May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1990/00 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). ~'~?~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 6 RESOLUTION NO. 99-061 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999/00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-062 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD- 85) 21. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the 78 Engineer's reports and setting of the Public Hearing for May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1990/00 for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 99-063 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990/00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-064 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8. ~!v~'.~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 7 22. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and 84 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 96-26, located at the Northeast corner of Aspen and Laurel Streets, submitted by N & L Nilar Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-065 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 96-26 RESOLUTION NO. 99-066 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 96-26 23. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Bucknam & 91 Associates, Inc. (CO 99-030), to provide on-call technical services relating to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title II, in the amount of, but not to exceed, $20,000 per year, and appropriations of $15,000 from Account No. 10-4637-6028 and $5,000 from Account No. 20-4532-6028 for Fiscal Year 1998/99. 24. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful 92 Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a "Notice of Completion" for Improvements for DR 96-18, located on the south side of Sixth Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 99-067 93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 96-18 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 95 25. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for Improvements for DR 96-22, located at 12320 Fourth Street, submitted by Heritage Bag Company, a Texas Corporation. '~'~.~ '~i*- City Agenda March 17, 1999 8 RESOLUTION NO. 99-068 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 96-22, SUBMITTED BY HERITAGE BAG COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful 98 Performance Bond, accept Maintenance Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for Improvements for Tract 13565, submitted by Richmond American Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 99-069 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27. Approval to accept the Library Expansion Project, Contract No. 98- 101 068, as complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $46,592.00. RESOLUTION NO. 99-070 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 98- 068, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 9 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT ANNUAL COMMUNITY 103 DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1999-2000 - A review of the Federally-required Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, including the preliminary selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a new grant allocation of $959,000 and approximately $165,000 in reprogrammed funds. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 145 9.30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING DAYTIME CURFEW REGULATIONS ORDINANCE NO. 598 (first reading) 146 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND REVISING DAYTIME CURFEW REGULATIONS 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 OF 148 THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS ORDINANCE NO. 599 (first reading) 151 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ORDINANCE AND AMENDING TITLE 7 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE '~?~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 10 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT (CO 99-031} 152 REGARDING WAIVING THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX INCREASE FOR BOOKING FEES I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION CALLING 159 FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 99-071 160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE 201 A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Stadium 2. Etiwanda Creek Park 3. Bear Gulch Park/Arbor Day 4. Hermosa Park 5. Central Park 6. All City Parks 7. Trails 8. City Hall A. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teens 3. Youth Activities 4. Youth Sports 5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 6. Adult Sports 7. Proposed Boxing Program 8. Senior Transportation Progrant 9. Trips and Tours "~'~. ~.?i~ City Council Agenda March 17, 1999 11 10. Human Services 11. Facilities 12. The Grapevine 13. Contract Classes 14. Community Wide Special Events 15. California Park and Recreation Society Conference 16. Park and Recreation Commission 17. Epicenter J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCHESTER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 11,1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 17, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetin.q A. CALL. TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 17, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7':07 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rod Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No announcements or presentations were made. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Don Fensrefmaker, Field Representative for Assemblywoman Nell Soto, introduced himself. He told about the committees that Assemblywoman $oto has been appointed to and added that they are here to serve Rancho Cucamonga. C2. Debra Berger, who lives on Hillside between the Tolstoy House and Schowalter Rock Pile, stated she would like to see the old homes on Foothill restored. She also commented on other historic homes and their importance to the community. She asked that the Council consider something other than bulldozing the homes on Foothill. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager stated he would like to add the following item to the Consent Calendar: "Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4 and Street lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. I and 4 for Tract Map Number 15072-1 and 15072, located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation." MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to add the above stated item as No. 19 to the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. D1. Approval of Minutes: December 8, 1998 (Special meeting) D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 1999. D3. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/13/99, 1/20/99, 1/27/99 and 2/3/99 and Payroll ending 1/7/99 and 1/21/99 for the total amount of $4,629,006.83. D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the painting and exterior stucco repair to the sports facility to be funded from Account No. 25-4285-7043. RESOLUTION NO. 99-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PAINTING AND EXTERIOR STUCCO REPAIR TO THE SPORTS FACILITY IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the local street pavement rehabilitation - overlay, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9113. RESOLUTION NO. 99-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval of the Resolutions modifying the Engineer's Report and confirming the assessments to complete capital projects on 4TM Street from Utica to Pittsburgh Avenues, within the boundaries of an assessment district formerly known as Assessment District No. 82-1R (6th Street Industrial District), and to appropriate $687,200 from Fund 93 (AD 82-1 R) Account No. 93-4130. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 (8TM STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) RESOLUTION NO. 99-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MODIFIED ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENTS, AND ORDERING THE WORK FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1 (6TM STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) D7. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090 and the City's Records Retention Schedule. RESOLUTION NO. 99-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERN M ENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES D8. Approval of request by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's West Valley Search and Rescue Team to waive temporary use permit fee in conjunction with the Annual 5/10K Run event on April 24, 1999. D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Development Review 97-38 (modified), located on the south side of Arrow Route, between Utica Avenue and Red Oak Street, submitted by Public Storage, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 99-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-38 (MODIFIED) RESOLUTION NO. 99-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-38 (MODIFIED) D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for MDR 97-19, located at 10900 Fourth Street, submitted by W9/WLA Real Estate Limited Partnership. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 99-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MDR 97-19 Dll. Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for all interior street improvements, parkway improvements, and signalization at Terra Vista Drive and Church Street, Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, Mountain View Drive and Milliken Avenue, related to Tentative Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Baseline Road, submitted by Kaufmann and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ALL INTERIOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND SIGNALIZATION, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 D12. Appropriate $200,000.00 from the Fund Balance of Local Measure I Fund 32 to be placed in Local Measure I Fund Account No. 32-4637-9707, award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-021 ) in the amount of $223,919.41 ($203,563.10 plus 10% contingency) for the construction of the Fourth Street Rehabilitation Project, from 323'_+ west of Santa Anita Street to 2277'+ east of Santa Anita Avenue to the apparent low bidder to be funded from Prop 111 Fund Account No. 10-4637-9707 ($219969.41) and Measure I Fund Account No. 32-4637-9707 ($3,950.00). D13. Approval of a Maintenance Agreement (CO 99-022) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and a request to summarily vacate a portion of Carnelian Street both in conjunction with the proposed realignment of Carnelian Street from Vivero Street to 1000 feet southerly. RESOLUTION NO. 99-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 99-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF CARNELIAN STREET D14. Approval of License Agreement (CO 99-023) between San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Underground Storm Drain Crossing across the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Railroad, generally located on Etiwanda Avenue 600 feet south of Whittram Ave. for Development Review 94-16 by Ameron, Inc. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 99-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-16, STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ON SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENT RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 14376, located at the northwest corner of Rancheria and Red Hill Country Club Drives, submitted by Longwell Investments, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 99-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 14376 D 16. Approval to release the Maintenance Bond for DR 96-21, located on the southeast corner of Buffalo Avenue and San Marino Street, submitted by Oltmans Construction Company. Release Maintenance Bond #B275 00 36 $11,550.00 D17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tracts 13279, 14534, 14534-1 and -2, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Incorporated, located on the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. RESOLUTION NO. 99-039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 13279, 14534, 14534-1 AND -2, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D18. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation, from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, Contract No. 98-043, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $303,361.05. RESOLUTION NO. 99-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION, FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO BASE LINE ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 98-043 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D 19. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.4 and Street lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map Number 15072-1 and 15072, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., a California Corporation. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 99-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15072-1 AND 15072 RESOLUTION NO. 99-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15072-1 AND 15072 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO ONTARIO CAB COMPANY Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this has been withdrawn and there is no need to conduct the public hearing. F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND TIME EXTENSION FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14475 -ALLARD ENGINEERING -Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request for an extension of a previously approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 66 single family lots on 113 acres of land in the Hillside Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond between Sapphire and Turquoise Streets - APN: 200-051-07 and 55 through 57. Staff report presented by Rebecca VanBuren, Associate Planner. She also presented slides showing this project area and referred to other correspondence which is on file in their records. Councilmember Curatalo clarified if staff had warned the applicant nine months before this was due to expire. Rebecca VanBuren, Associate Planner, stated yes they did and that they had not heard back from the applicant until October. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 7 Councilmember Dutton clarified that there were now two endangered species in that area that were not there before. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, stated he was hired by the applicant to represent them in this process and to give the Council more information about this appeal. He stated their task is to do what is right. He stated the family has owned this property since 1920. He continued to give background information about the project. He stated staff did not contact the developer until October and that he had witnesses to testify to this. He stated they have kept staff informed as to what is going on with the project. He stated they requested a time extension at the January Planning Commission meeting and pointed out they were denied and that is why they are before the Council tonight. He commented on all the time that has been put into this project and added he did not think the company that provided the survey should be questioned because they are a reputable firm that the City also uses. Stephanie Clare, Attorney for the developer, read an article re CEQA. She referred to the staff report dated 7/8/92, page 140. She stated they have looked for mitigation measures relating to the coastal sage scrub. She stated the environmental review process has not been done, but that the Council could do this through a negative declaration. Ray Allard, engineer for the project and representing the applicant, stated he has read correspondence relating to the project and the course of events of getting it through the process after he took it over from the first engineer for the project. He stated they were "behind the eight ball" from the beginning because of the protocol survey and the time it took to complete it. Jack Easton, LSA Associates, and in charge of the biological assessment for this project, commented on the surveys that took place and the endangered species information that was discovered, including some sensitive species that staff had also reported. He presented the Council with a boundary map of the property and explained it. He felt that less than1 to 1 mitigation would be more than adequate, and that 1 to 1 would be more than adequate and that 1.4 is more than enough mitigation to compensate for the losses that would result from coastal sage scrub of the proposed project, and would therefore reduce impacts to below a level of significance. Mr. Buquet added they have followed up with CCWD and that there is no water issue relating to this property. Cameron Mongreen did not feel this project should be built because there would not be any animals left if it is built. She did not feel all of the sage, animals and history should be taken away. Jim Frost stated he felt most of this area is undevelopable and that the Council should use this for mitigation. Catherine Bridge, 8715 Banyan, felt the Council should vote to keep the land as it is and felt there should be a plan to keep the animals and endangered species there. She felt the wash area was undevelopable. Frank Chervonne, 8060 Crestview Court, stated he agreed with the Planning Commission and felt this project should be rethought. He asked that the Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision because there were many issues that needed to be addressed. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 8 James Kinney, lawyer in Los Angeles, and homeowner near this area of the project, felt the property value would increase if the project was built. He stated it would also make it more safe if the project was built. He stated there is nothing to prevent the developer from coming back tomorrow to submit the project again since this is already expired. He felt the developer is asking the Council to break the law. He stated they have had many opportunities and have missed them. Chuck Buquet stated they have the right to go forward with this project. He felt they have acted in good faith. He felt the Council has the ultimate say in this project having a chance. He asked for them to give consideration and consider disagreeing with staff and the Planning Commission. Jim Frost stated the map has expired and felt the City can do better. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. James Markman, City Attorney, stated they have had plenty of time to record the final map and get the Council to approve it. He stated it was not an issue that there are changed circumstances. He stated they could extend the tract map for a period of time and do a CEQA review. He stated they could go along with the Planning Commission's decision and deny the request. He stated he did not see any way around not having a CEQA review. Councilmember Dutton talked about his involvement on the County Economic Development Commission. He stated he is leaning towards property rights, but pointed out he is also concerned about the environment. Councilmember Williams stated she felt this needs to be looked at again and would uphold the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Curatalo stated he does not know why the applicant let this expire to begin with. He asked about the comment Mr. Allard made whereby staff had told him it was okay to allow the map to expire as long as he made a request to what. Mr. Allard stated he was told if the request was made prior to the map extending, then time would be allowed for the completion of the report. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they had talked about time lines with Mr. Allard and the process involved. He stated they always pursue time extensions with the intent that there is a possibility of a negative declaration. He stated that was the purpose of his statement to him that if he gets his application in within time, staff would take the necessary steps, but added as it became apparent that there was more to this site, staff stated there was more information and they did not get the information prior to the hearing. Brad stated this question was asked by Mr. Allard back in June or July. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the Map Act has a real clear time line as to when these maps run out if you have applied for an extension. He stated he did not think the staff should be responsible for advising people with valuable property rights when their time is going to run out. Councilmember Biane stated he is normally for the property owner, but stated he felt they needed to take a fresh look at this and he would go along with the Planning Commission. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed and that he felt the environmental issue should be looked at again. He felt they should not have waited until the last minute. He added this could always be resubmitted. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 99-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING A TIME EXTENSION FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14475, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 66 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, LOCATED NORTH OF ALMOND AVENUE BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 200-051-07, 55, 56, AND 57. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 99-041. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. A recess was taken at 8:28 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:40 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. F3. HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION 98-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to rescind Historic Landmark Designation 94-02, and redesignate as a Point of Interest, four craftsman bungalow residences located at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-153-08 through 11. (Continued from February 3, 1999) Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner, who stated it appears to be too costly to renovate the buildings. He stated they found it would be hess costly to replicate the buildings. He stated the neighbors think it is an eyesore and staff still feels it is best to demolish the buildings. Councilmember Biane asked Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, what the condition of the buildings was, and could they be moved to another site. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated he felt they could be relocated and are salvageable, but that it depended upon the amount of funds available to do this. He stated if they are moved, they would still have to comply with handicap access. He felt they could be replicated and would conform with the building code and meet the handicap requirements, which would be less cost than renovating them. Councilmember Williams asked if the owner is willing to replicate the buildings. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they have not been able to get in touch with the owner. Councilmember Williams felt that new buildings should be built and replicated and felt it would be a lot more cost efficient. Councilmember Curatalo asked what would the life span be of retrofitting as opposed to replicating. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated it would be the same life span either way. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to see the existing structures kept. He asked if there is something they can do to require the property owner to keep the property better maintained. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 10 Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated there are codes available now to maintain occupied buildings, but that they do not apply to vacant buildings. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to explore something to make property owners more responsible for maintaining these types of properties. Councilmember Williams felt if something is done like this it should not only be for historical buildings, but across the board. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Jim Frost stated he did not think the Building Official would have sent out a letter unless he was directed to by the Council. He continued to talk about the Historic Preservation Commission and stated they have lost four valuable members of the Commission when they died. He felt that discussion should occur if the Historic Preservation/Planning Commission should remain as the same people. He did not think this serves the City well. He did not think they could do both jobs effectively. He stated he would like to see money budgeted for cultural awareness (historic preservation) by their being an independent commission to serve as the Historic Preservation Commission. He stated he has been in Rancho Cucamonga since 1938. He stated he likes the City and what they have done so far. He stated he would be willing to sit on a committee to help raise funds to save the buildings. He also stated he would like to get some assurance that this will get done. Rick Spurlock, real estate agent for Aria Campos, told about what Ms. Campos has done and the money she has spent to develop this property. He stated he did not think the houses should be linked to Route 66, but felt the gas station was linked. He felt the houses were an eyesore. He added that Ms. Campos does have a buyer for the property. He stated he does not see the significance of preserving these houses. Debra Burger stated it is not really the same to replicate the houses. She felt something should be done with the houses in conjunction with Route 66 and that it could create tourism. She asked what could be put in their place that would be significant if they are taken out. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Biane pointed out that Rancho Cucamonga is the only City that is behind Mr. Lundy's efforts in promoting Route 66. He stated he does not appreciate Jim Frost stating there is no one who knows or cares about historic preservation. He stated he lives in a home built in 1930. He stated you can't turn every home into a museum because it is not economically feasible. He felt there should be a task force to look at these historical sites. He stated as far as the cottages, he felt they should be replicated with something to go along with the gas station. Councilmember Dutton stated he does not have a problem with putting funds into historic preservation, but felt that the community should put something into this themselves. He stated he did not think there was anything else that could be done to this site. Councilmember Williams stated she concurred. She stated there are only so many dollars available and that they need to be spent wisely or they get watered down. She stated she would like to see something done to the Red Chief Motel, but knows it is very costly to do so at this time. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 11 Mayor Alexander stated the buildings that are to be saved have to be prioritized and that they cannot all be built. He stated it is a shame to lose some of the buildings, but the City cannot afford to save them all. RESOLUTION NO. 99-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CHANGE FROM A LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK TO POINT OF INTEREST NO. 98-01 FOR FOUR HOUSES, LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634 AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 208-153-08 THROUGH 11 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 99-025. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. ISLE HOUSE RELOCATION - Consideration of an Agreement (CO99-024) of purchase of property for the relocation of the Isle House. Staff report presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to approve Contract No. 99-024. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 12. ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE UPDATE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmember Biane inquired if Route 30 is still on schedule. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 12 13. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Rancho Cucamonga Public Library 2. R.C. Family Sports Center 3. Stadium 4. Red Hill Park 5. Etiwanda Creek Park 6. Central Park B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teens 3. Youth Activities 4. Youth Sports 5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 6. Adult Sports 7. Proposed Boxing Program 8. Senior Transportation program 9. Trips and Tours 10. Human Services 11. Facilities 12. The Grapevine 13. Contract Classes 14. Community Wide Special Events 15. California Park and Recreation Society Conference 16. Park and Recreation Commission 17. Epicenter ACTION: Report received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Biane stated he would like to look at the possibility of setting up a task force to look at historic preservation along Foothill between Archibald to Hellman. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes February 17, 1999 Page 13 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to adjourn to executive session to discuss Property Negotiations Per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Party, regarding Terms of Payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. No action was taken in executive session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ** March 3, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 3, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Presentwere Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planer; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. Dave Lau, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation designating the month of March as Red Cross Month. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to the Red Cross. Duane Baker was also recognized as being on the Board of Directors and was thanked for all of his help. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Gina Oaks congratulating her on being selected to the Amateur Softbail/USA Softball 1999 Junior Girls National Team. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Gina Oaks. B3. Jack Lam, City Manager, announced that Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, has been awarded by the American Society for Public Administration the Walter Moe Grant for Advancing Graduate Studies. City Council Minutes March 3, 1999 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Scott Gibson, resident of the City near Alta Loma High School, talked about the poor condition of his street and curbs. He wondered if something could be done about this. He stated he has recently remodeled his home and now would like to get the poor street conditions fixed so that it will look nicer. He reported he had the Maintenance Department out and was told his street was not bad enough to do something about it. Mayor Alexander stated they will look at this and see what can be done to help out this situation. He asked him to leave the poster and pictures he displayed for the Council to see. Jack Lain, City Manager, suggested that Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, meet with him to see if something can be done. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D 1. Approval of Minutes: January 20, 1999 February 3, 1999 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/10/99 and 2/17/99, and Payroll ending 2/4/99, for the total amount of 1,568,018.98. D3. Approval of a recommendation to install all-way stop control at the intersection of Plum Way and Verbena Court. D4. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090 and the City's Records Retention Schedule. RESOLUTION NO. 99-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO /.ONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES D5. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for C.U.P. 97-41, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Mr. David Delrahim. RESOLUTION NO. 99-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOP, C.U.P. 97-41 City Council Minutes March 3, 1999 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR C.U.P. 97-41 D6. Approval to amend an operating agreement (CO 99-025) to extend lender services between Bank of America and the city of Rancho Cucamonga Home Improvement Program. D7. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO 99-026) between the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the funding of the construction of a water line within Day Creek Boulevard as a part of the Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard Project. RESOLUTION NO. 99-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (CCWD) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN, FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES ©F A WATER LINE AS A PART OF THE HIGHLAND AVENUE/DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PROJECT D8. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO 99-027) between Lewis Homes Enterprises and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the funding of the construction of a storm drain within Base Line Road as a part of the Highland Avenue/Day Creek Boulevard project. RESOLUTION NO. 99-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LEWIS HOMES ENTERPRISES AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN, FUNDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF A STORM DRAIN WITHIN BASE LINE ROAD AS A PART OF THE HIGHLAND AVENUE/DAY CREEK BOULEVARD PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. City Council Minutes March 3, 1999 Page 4 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED RESOLUTION ADOPTING FACILITY RENTAL FEE WAIVER AND CITY SERVICE CHARGE WAIVER POLICIES FOR THE EPICENTER Staff report presented by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no input, public comments were closed. RESOLUTION NO. 99-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FACILITY RENTAL FEE WAIVER AND CITY SERVICE CHARGE WAIVER POLICIES FOR THE EPICENTER MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 99-049. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 12. CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE REQUEST FROM HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH TO WAIVE FEES FOR THE SOAPBOX CLASSIC TO BE HELD ON MAY 31, 1999, AT THE EPICENTER Staff report presented by Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was: Dave Burns, Senior Pastor of Hillside Church, stated they have a lot of sponsors and that this has grown into a very large event. He stated they are very happy to be doing this and asked that the City also get involved. Councilmember Curatalo stated he is proud that the Hillside Church is involved and supporting the youth of the community. City Council Minutes March 3, 1999 Page 5 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to waive the fees as requested. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 13. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A ROUTE 30 MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANSWERING QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Councilmember Williams gave a report stating she was approached by many residents that the City Council discuss setting another meeting to discuss their concerns. She said she has discovered that most of the people are mostly concerned about their individual circumstance, and they need to see a map and see how this will affect their homes and businesses. She stated in between the meeting from the other night and this meeting tonight, staff mas met with SANBAG representatives and the concerns that she had written down have been passed along to them. She stated staff has been diligent in pursuing these things. She read a list of the mitigating items that are going to take place which she felt would take care of most of the issues that the citizens had the other night. She stated after they go through all of these measures and if there are still citizens who want to have a meeting or if the Council wants to have a meeting it can be scheduled at that time. She said ifa meeting was needed it could possibly take place between 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. at Lions Center where people can come on a casual basis and look at the maps and talk one-on-one with the staff. She read the following list of mitigating factors: 1. SAN BAG is going to put together a question and answer sheet from the questions fielded the other night. She said this information will go out on City letterhead to 1800 people living along the corridor of Carnelian and also anyone who signed up at the meeting. She said anyone else who wants to receive this information just has to let the City know that. 2. SANBAG is going to purchase newspaper ads to explain the supplemental mitigations, this will also be on the SANBAG and City websites. 3. There will also be on site informational signs that will explain the detours better. 4. There will be a Route 30 hotline established which will be published in the newsletter. 5. There will be a pedestrian bypass built for students going to and from school. 6. Sapphire Street will be restriped to four lanes from 19t" Street to Alta Loma Drive, and no parking signs will be installed along Sapphire for that period of time. 7. A temporary traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Sapphire/Highland to provide traffic control with breaks in the traffic flow so residents on Sapphire can get in and out of their driveways. 8. The traffic signal at 19th Street and Sapphire will be modified so that split phasing for north and south traffic which will allow more cars to get through. 9. The left turn pocket for eastbound 19TM at Sapphire will be lengthened as much as possible to accommodate the traffic. 10. Traffic signal at the intersection of 19~h and Carnelian will be modified to provide split phasing for north and south traffic. Striping will be modified also to allow left turn lane from two lanes. City Council Minutes March 3, 1999 Page 6 11. The City will modify the traffic signal at the intersection of 19th Street and Carnelian to provide a protective left turn phasing for the north/south traffic. She stated this work will be done during the same time as the bridge construction so that when it opens up again the new signal will be in place. She felt because of these measures a meeting does not need to be set right now, but that they may want to do this in the future. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council was: Carlos Reyes stated his concern is the timing of the closures of some of the streets. He was concerned about the amount of traffic that Sapphire could handle once Carnelian is closed. He also was concerned if Beryl would remain open to handle north/south traffic.. He asked if the City has taken into consideration emergency vehicles passing through the construction area and what the response time would be. He mentioned Councilmember Williams addressed one of his concerns about the students and pedestrians near the construction area. He stated he was glad to hear there would be additional lighting at Highland and Sapphire. He stated he was glad to hear the City would be doing the islands along Foothill from Vineyard to Haven, but felt the timing was off because of all of the freeway construction traffic that would be going on also. Mayor Alexander asked that Mr. Reyes' concerns be added to the list of items Councilmember Williams previously brought up which would be included in the mail out. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Mayor Alexander announced there will be a senior citizens Fine Arts Show on March 6 - 7. He added Community Services will be putting on a presentation on April 17 "Amusing Children's Theater" at the Lions West Center. He stated the seniors from various surrounding neighborhoods will be putting on an event called the "Golden Follies" at the Montclair Community Center on March 27. Councilmember Williams announced the Library Telethon will be held March 19, 20, 21. She brought up the challenge that has been put to the Council from the City Manager to raise money for the telethon. City Council Minutes March 3, 1999 Page 7 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn to executive session to discuss Property Negotiations Per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Party, regarding Terms of Payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m. No action was taken in executive session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ** CITY ()F RANCt IO CIJCAMON(}A MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council TO: Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Directorjbkff~ BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II ~¥ SUBJECT: Report on Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Association Fund-raising Activities and Distribution of Funds In response to your request for information pertaining to funds raised from the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Association's Celebrity Softball Game held on October 4, 1999, at the Epicenter Stadium, the Association has prepared the attached memorandum which details the distribution of monies raised from their fund-raising activities. It is our understanding that the Firefighters Association will be at the March 17, 1999, City Council meeting to present this information in person and to publicly thank the City Council for their support and assistance which has allowed the Association to donate funds to a wide variety of organizations and individuals. Attachment cc: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager ' ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION TO: Rancho Cucamonga City Council / City manager FROM: Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firefighters Association SUBJECT: Fundraisers and Donations In our fiscal year ending I ! -30-98 we were successful in raising the following amounts; Celebrity(Fox I I)/RC Firefighters softball game ! 5, I ! 0.55 R.C. Fire Car Show @ Red Hill Park 4,104.07 Spark of Love (donations & Terra Vista fountain coins) 7,246.00 R.C Firefighters / R.C. Sheriffs Golf Toum. 5,176.20 Total Fundraisers 31,636.82 Thanks to your support and help we were able to stage the above events, which enabled us to donate to the following causes during the year, RC YMCA 5589.00 City of RC Roller Hockey Team ! 85.00 ACE Youth Softball 200.00 IAFF Disaster Relief 100.00 Luekemia Society 65.00 Rapp Family Fund 165.00 West Valley Search & Rescue 250.00 Ashley Smith (bum victim) 150.00 Spark of Love Toys 212.00 Abel Family (AMR) ! 00.00 Alta Loma Little League 200.00 K. Ball (Empire Pageants) 205.00 Luekemia Society 250.00 National Multiple Sclerosis 100.00 RC Library 100.00 Nathan Gardner Fund 200.00 Colton Firefighters ( FF Ball) 350.00 AYSO 250.00 Etiwanda Footbal ! 100.00 Children's Hospital of Orange Co. 50.00 Bottom family (Kokomo FF) 50.00 Dupee Childrens Fund (LA City FF) 100.00 RC Library 2O.OO Grace Mar Prod. (library books) 46.35 RC Family YMCA 250.00 A Brown Memorial 250.00 Yucaipa/Highland Firefighters (gol£tourn.) 75.00 City of RC (Concerts in the Park) 250.00 P.O. Box 491, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION American Red Cross 50.00 Azuza Universi~ 250.00 Redlands Firefighters C~r Show 100.00 J. Coo~an Family (G!enc~l¢ IF) 100.00 City of RC (4th of July Celebration ) 250.00 City of RC (Art in the Park) 250.00 Detco (school awards) 161.62 T. Seward (Empire Pageants) 198.00 We Tip 150.00 V. Caplan (iafflocal 1563) 50.00 Revlon Run for Women 25.00 Charley College Foundation 100.00 Alta Loma High 12th Man Club 150.00 Revlon Run for Womeia 50.00 83 Arsenal Girls Soccer 250.00 Rialto Firefighters 285.00 · Firefighters Bum Quest 2000.00 American Red Cross 50.00 Muscular Distrophy Assoc. 200.00 Alternate Avenues (PC) 50.00 American Legion Baseball 100.00 Empire Lakes Golf(Jr. Jam 98) 250.00 Chino FF Golf Toum. ! 00.00 Grizzlies Hockey 100.00 Cucamonga Rockies Baseball 250.00 City of RC (Concerts in the Park) 750.00 South Charleston FF Benefit 50.00 Childrens Fund Duck Race 25.00 AVSC 250.00 Treasure Island Federal FF Relief Fund 100.00 R Crawford (Bartlesville FF) 100.00 Gold Coast Beauty Pageants 250.00 Alta Loma High School (Calenders) 500.00 Rose of Sharon Walk 100.00 American Red Cross 100.00 J. Walters (Eugene FF) 50.00 RC High 4th Qtr. Club 150.00. AYSO Region 65 200.00 R. Cook (Surly FF) 50.00 AYSO Soc~r 200.00 AYSO Soccer 200.00 Bum Institute (Bum Camp) 425.00 B. Eckard Fund (Albertsons Employee) 100.00 R. Wooten (Santa Cruz IF) 50.00 Stockton FF Memorial 150.00 Avons Breast Cancer 150.00 Garden of Angels Inc. 50.00 P.O. Box 491, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 " : RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION Rialto FF Golf Toum. 50.00 Luekemia Society Auction 250.00 Childtens Hospital of Orange Co. 50.00 Vietnam Wall Memorial 150.00 S. Age (Redondo Beach FF) 50.00 OCPFA Local 3631 50.00 Alta Loma High Booster 250.00 Luekemia Society 250.00 National Multiple Sclerosis 50.00 Montclair Police GolfTourn. 125.00 S. Layne memorial 250.00 J. Littlejohn Med. Fund 250.00 Luekemia Society (Ontario FF marathon) 50.00 Hometown Recreation (RC) 250.00 Total donations 21,366.97 P.O. Box 491, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 03-03-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 03/03/99 PAGE: 1 O NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. O~ CHECKe OVERLAP 1890 R & R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES 1289320 77.52- ((( 128933 - 135832 545 RED WING ~HOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS 1358330 139.22- (<< 135834 - 135847 3301 SEFAC LIFT & EQUIPMENT CORPORATION SERVICE AND SUPPLIES e 135848~ 2,908.53- ((( 135849 - 136614 1098 Ao G. ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SER¥ICES 1366150 ((( 136616 - 136641 1135 AUTO SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 1366420 1,00~o06- ¢(( 136643 - 136736 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPE~ SUPPLIES # 1367370 121o04- ~ ¢(( 136738 - 136784 235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 1367850 [0,968°84- (C( 136786 - 136898 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES 1368990 37o16 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES # 136900~ 83.88 ¢(( 136901 - 136903 3901 3-D CARPET & DRAPERY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136904 225.00 1098 A. G. ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136905 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 136906 441o83 4373 ACO SANITATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL 136907 131o68 5509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136908 396°74 4207 ALERT CONMLNICATIONS CO. INSTALLATION/SERVICE 136~9 246.92 Z1138 ALEXANDER~ PALMER RECREATION REFUND 136910 973 ALPHAGRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES t 136911 249.01 5650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136912 240.00 1430 AMERICAN B~SINESS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES e 136913 1,914.32 5658 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SAFETY SUPPLIES 136914 97°08 ~92 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 136915 369.00 2693 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES MONTHLY SERVICE # 136916 1,176.70 Z1139 APARAOISE CEVELOPERS P~RMIT REFUND e 136917 154o88 5321 APOLLO WOOD RECOVERY, INC. SUPPLIES & SERVICE I 136918 36°00 3957 ARTCRAFT, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 136919 65°98 5954 A~T[STAS PACIFIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 136920 1,346.00 5069 ASSOCoARTISTS OF THE INLAND E~PIRE RECREATION SUPPLIES 136921 50°00 2437 ASSOCIAYEO GROUP, THE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE I 136922 1,555.00 1135 AUTO SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 136923 267.88 ~102 8 & K ELECTRIC ~HOL~SALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136924 821-72 4962 BANNER SECURITY SYSTEMS INC. SUPPLIES £ SERVICE 136925 1~275o00 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 136926 49°37 6142 BASSETT-SMITH, TERRI RECREATION REFUND 136927 50~85 4441 BEST BUY CO., INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 136928 489°86 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO.~ INCo RECREATION SUPPLIES # 136929 66.23 21136 BOLING M.D., EUGENE Po BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 130930 23.Z0 ((( 136931 - 136931 4369 BRODART BOOKS LIERARY SUPPLIES # 136932 1,953.37 576 BULLER~ BRAD PLANNING COMMo INSTITUTE MTGo 136933 162.50 5963 BUSY BODY, INC. MAINTENANCE 136934 396.88 4772 BYRD AND ASSOCIATES, IMCo R.M. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 136935 6,000°00 21137 C O R CONCRETE, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136936 77.50 980 C M B T A Co~o8.ToAo MEETING 136937 50°00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIO0: 03-03-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 03/03/99 PAGE: VENOOR NAME ITEM OESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo ANT. ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 6121 C.D.S. PROOUCTIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136938 140o00 21141 CAL POLY REGISTRATION 136939 470.00 4575 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSOC. EMPLOYMENT AO 136940 429.00 ZI135 CARFELt ~NC° &USINESS LICENSE REFUND 136941 7.00 588[ CARTE GRaP~ SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 136942 6t719.00 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136943 1t912.35 74 CITY RENTALS EQbIPMENT RENTaL/SUPPLIES # 136944 640.70 gX4 CLAREMONT CAPERa & VIDEDt INC. SUPPLIES/SERVICES I 136945 91.97 21[40 CLCA 1999 LANDSCAPE INDUSTRY SHOW REGISTRATION I36946 200o00 (<( 136947 - 136948 ~30 COMPUTER SERVICE CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 136949 13m225~94 643 COMPUTERLANO COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # [36950 18Z.02 633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 136951 2,026.78 ((( I36992 - I36954 85 CUCAMONGa CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS t 136995 11t416.69 36603 DAVIS, DEVON RECREATION REFUND 136956 38o00 4826 DANSON LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION 136957 36604 DE LOS SANTOS, ANA RECREATION REFUNO e 136958 SO.00 105 DERBISH GUERRA E ASSOC° CONTRACT SERVICES 136959 I07 OETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES e [36960 55.49 839 DIETERIC~ INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE e 13696I 175.35 3779 OORNXNG~ GLENN 8. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES [36~2 g9.42 &205 O~NAMIC GRaPhICS, INC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT 136963 53°50 36605 ENR SUESCRIPTION [36964 2349 ESGIL CORP. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136965 8,753°$$ 4516 EXCEPTIONAL TERMITE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE # I36966 4914 EXCLUSIVE EHaGES OFFICE SUPPLIES 136967 28.55 ~29I FAMZLIAN PIPE & SUPPLY MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 136968 645°05 5917 FaSTENAL COPPANT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND [36969 24.00 36606 FIBRE CONTAINERS COMPANY M.F.G° BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136970 15o85 5918 FLORENCE FILLER CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136971 lt771.33 36607 GALEA~ PaUL RECREATION REFUND 136972 38.00 6071 GALLOS NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136973 108o25 ~288 GARRETT CONC. CORING & SAWING~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136974 190.00 3992 GIBBY°S FENCING MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136975 646°50 36608 GIBSON GREETINGS INCo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136976 8o08 4632 GLOBAL TELE-OATA CCRPDRATION PARTS & INSTALLATION 136977 50°00 3388 GOLOEN aEAR aRBORISTSt INC. PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES 136978 2,736°00 36609 GOLOEN STATE FENCE COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 136979 66°24 5955 GOLOEN WEST ~ISTRZBUTING RECREATION SUPPLIES 136980 69.88 1245 GONSALVES & SON, JOE a. LEGISLATIVE SERVICES a 136981 6,900°00 650 GRAINGERt ~°W. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136982 ~22.63 3827 GREEN ROCK POWER EgUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 136983 532o0! ((( 136984 - 136984 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS e 136985 3~272o81 36610 GULF SOUTH ~EDICAL SUPPLYt INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 136986 141.77 6084 HAODONt OakN BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136987 196o60 31315 HAPPY ICE INC. aUSINESS LICENSE 136988 15.00 1244 HAVEN BUILDING ~ATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136989 31309 HERRERA~ ~TGIA RECREATION 136990 200o00 616 HIGHSMITH COtINC. ~; MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136991 132o08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 03-03-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 03/03/99 PAGE: 3 NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo AMT. ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK COo~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136992 2~989.67 2255 HOLT°$ AUT: ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 136993 70.04 1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136994 75°95 16! HOYT LUMBER C0o~ SoHo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 136995 695.92 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PROOUCTS~ INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136996 112o83 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED CDNP 136997 721.00 4188 I*D. BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 136998 298.22 5882 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 O1 t 136999 6~159.35 1121 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE 137000 65°50 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137001 115.80 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN°S SOCCER PROGRAN # 137002 1~684o50 3885 INLAND LA~NMO~ER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 137003 75.19 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS 137004 141.96 ~315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 137005 116o27 3641 INT'L. SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE MEMBERSHIP DUES 137006 77°00 5147 IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION SAFETY TRAINING 137007 40.00 61~ JENSEN~ ERIC RECREATION REFUND 137008 500.00 ~431 JON'S FLAG SHOP RECREATION SUPPLIES 137009 468.?! 6139 KAUFMAN ANO BROAD REIMB. PEST CNTRL REGISTRATION I 137010 4128 KELLY E~UIP~ENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES 137011 Z2ZO KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES 137012 18o29 31308 KHAKI~ MCHAM~AD RECREATION 137013 50°00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137014 6090 KONG~ SOPHaK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137015 172 KOZLOVICH, CEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 137016 28.80 518 KUHN~ MARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137017 136o34 31310 L.A. CHURCh OF CHRIST RECREATION 137015 200°00 6073 LA POINTE ¥ICEO PRCDUCTION~ JERRT RECREATION REFUND 137019 18.86 88 LA VOZ ADYERTISING 137020 390°00 IO?S LAB SAFETY SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 137021 1,066o20 4242 LAIOLAW TRANSIT~ INC. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 137022 488.84 a49 LAWSON PROCUCTSe INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 137023 604°97 979 LEWIS HOMES REFUND OF OEVELOPMENT FEES 137024 8°50 1455 LONG*S ORUGS FILM PROCESSING I 137025 39.99 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 137026 373.06 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 137027 33o12 200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 137028 31.74 600 LYNCH~ JANIE RECREATION SUPPLIES 137029 52.23 313~4 MoS. ROUSE COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE 137030 109o80 31303 MACZASe AMALIA RECREATION 137031 65.00 31305 MACKNIGHTe KAREN RECREATION 137032 38.00 6143 MANNERINO~ J£HN R~CREATION REFUNO 137033 162.50 5~9 MARIPOSA HCRTICULTURAL ENToINC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~ 137034 4727 MARSHALL PLUMBING RRhABo PROGRAM e 137035 573.10 5283 MAYERe COBLE & PAL~ER PRCFESSIONAL SERVICE 137036 1025 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 137037 148o44 5148 MCCLINTON TRUCKING COotINC~ J.C. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 137038 20t4~0.06 31316 MCKESSON DRUG COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE 137039 7.94 .31306 MCKIBBIN~ LAURA RECREATION 137040 37~00 30801 MCNIEL~ LARRY CASH ACVANCE 1370~1 162.50 31311 NEEDER EGUIP~ENT CO. RELEASE OF OEPOS[T 1370*2 1~000o00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 03-03-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 03/03/99 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM OESCRIPTION WARR NO ~ARR. AMT. ~0 CHECKg OVERLAP 2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. g3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES I 137043 115o82 2597 MINNESOTa kESTERN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137044 1,077o50 3860 MOBILE MINI~ INC. STCRAGE SUPPLIES e 137045 545.98 31304 MORALES, OINa RECREATION 137046 12.50 31307 MORRISON, FXaNA RECREATION 13T047 37.00 1020 MOUNTAIN VIEk GLASS E MIRROR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 137048 765o61 6085 McAROLEt KEVIN BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137049 46o10 744 NATIONAL OEFERRED OEFERREO CDNP 137050 31312 NETWORK aN~ COMPUTER CONSULTANTS BUSINESS LICENSE 137051 5.40 5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 137052 7~0.00 433 NIXON-EGLI EgUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE a 137053 588o8~ ¢<< 137054 - 137054 523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 137055 336.85 3~29 ON CaLL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 137056 829.60 3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 137057 124 ORANGE CObNT~ STRIPING SVC, INC. 8US~NESS LICENSE 137058 14.06 5461 ORCHARO SUPPLY HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 137059 ~,066.74 4904 ~TT, LAURA INSTRUCTOR SNRoEXERCISE CLASS e 137060 298.50 Z35 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # ~3706! 5635 P C MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION ~37062 26.97 338 PACIFIC EQUIPT & IRRIGATION, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 137063 550.03 !823 PAGENET PACING SERVICE t 137064 999.57 $18 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES I37065 199.56 31317 PATEL, RAKESH O.D.S. BUSINESS LICENSE 137066 100.00 614~ PC WORLD REFUND-CHECK SENT IN ERROR 137067 19.97 5597 PHOTOMAX SUPPLY CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137068 ~07.60 6089 PITTS, LISA RECREATION REFUNO 137069 300.00 255 P3MA DISTRIBUTING Cg VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES e ~37070 3~1~Z.95 30~36 POTTER, MELISSA RECREATION ~37071 ~00.00 4401 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIaN~ INC. EQbIPMENT RENTAL 137072 46.59 7215 PRESCMER, MONTE REIMBURSEMENT 137073 28.00 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES' PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR e 137074 90.10 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137075 4335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTH CA. INC qUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 137076 31513 PURE SPARKLING FRESH WATER S¥S. ~USINESS LICENSE 137077 30°00 !890 R & R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES 137078 293.51 1038 R d M DESIGN GROUP, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I37079 264 RALPMS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES I 137080 30.30 545 RgO WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS e I37081 A25.48 545 REO WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS 137082 150.00 5~I4 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES e 137083 1,323.41 6093 RHINO LININGS OF RANCHO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137084 375°00 5618 RICHARDS, WATSON, ~ GERSMON LEGAL SERVICES I 137085 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS a !37086 2~713.30 11338 ROLLINS, NCLLY RECREATION REFUNDS t 137087 1~339 ROWLANO, FRANCIS RECREATION REFUNDS 137O80 48.OO 4704 RUSH~ CHRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ~37089 148o50 &438 S C A C E ~ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 137090 !00.00 571 SAN BERN CQ OFFICE OF MNGMNT SVC TELEPRCCESSING SERVICES I37091 5o00 30I SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 137092 279.54 581 SAN 8ERNARCINO COUNTY CAL-ID PROGRAM a 137093 ~661.95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCR PERIOD: 03-03-99 RUN DATE: 03/03/99 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~ CHECKA OVERLAP 581 SAN BERNAREINO COUNTY CAL-ID PROGRAM 137094 34.60 279 SAN BERNARCINO COUNTY SUN SUBSCRIPTION 137095 31.52 132 SAN OIEGO ROTARY BRO0~ COp INC MAINT SUPPLIES 13709b 323°25 11340 SANODVALp GAEY RECREATION REFUNDS 137097 45°00 1105 SEAL FURNITURE E SYSTEMS INCo OFFICE SUPPLIES 137098 12~031.11 3696 SENECHAL~ CAL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT e 137099 148o50 11341 SHAW~ BLaNCA RECREATION REFUNOS 137100 11342 SHELLEY°S AUTOMOTIVE~ RON BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS 137101 79o13 2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES 137102 351 SIGN SHOPe T~E HAZNT SUPPLIES 137103 48°49 4513 SIMON E SCHUSTER ': LIBRARY SUPPLIES 137104 68o8~ 1327 SMART g FINAL DAY CA#P SUPPLIES # 137105 301o40 11067 SMIDERLEt RICHARO TUZTZON REIMBURSEMENT 137106 56°00 319 SO CALIF GAS CO° MONTHLY GAS 8ILLS a 137107 ((( 137108 - 137109 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 137110 27~900o06 5722 SPECTRA COPPANY LABOR AND SUPPLIES 137111 lt862.00 11167 STANDARD PACIFIC REIMB TEMP UTILITIES 137112 0.27 4176 STATE 80AR~ OF EQUALI:ATION HAZARDOUS ~ASTE DISPOSAL 137113 140.00 4176 STATE BOAR: CF EQUALIZATION HAZARDOUS ~aSTE DISPOSAL 137114 52.58 902 STATE OF CafCEPARTMENT OF TRANS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 137115 3597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL RENT-TRANSFER SITE 137116 5281 STERICYCLE~ INC. SHARPS PROGRAM # 137117 115.37 11349 STE~ARTe PaH EXPENSE ADVANCE 137118 162o50 5887 SUN BADGE CO. ~AOGES i 137119 147o47 5854 TELEMATION SUPPLIES 137120 224°83 3942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 137121 339°00 5907 TOLSTOY~ PETER TRAVEL ADVANCE 137122 162o50 11343 TOMRA PACIFIC/REYNOLDS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 137123 607°46 11344 TOTAL BUILDING SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 137124 7°20 3302 TOXGUARD SERVICE CONTRACT-RECYCLING 137125 275.62 4558 U. So GUARDS CO.~ INCo SECURITY GUARD SERVICE 137126 1~025.03 350 UoSo POSTMASTER POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEWSLETTER 137127 4~000o00 4788 UNDERGROUNC $VC. ALERT OF SO° CALIF UNCERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 137128 212.75 3912 UNIQUE CREaTiONS R~CREATION SUPPLIES a 137129 255.50 11345 VALENZUELA~ aNa RECREATION REFUNDS e 137130 37.00 11346 VALERY~ aNGELA RECREATION REFUNDS 137131 200~00 4787 VAN GALAAN LOCK & KEY SUPPLIES 137132 22o63 11347 VERHULST~ CONNIE RECREATION REFUNDS 137133 35°00 5285 VIRING TIRE VEHICLE SUPPL%ES e 137134 1~191~48 499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLING 1371~5 9~234.54 2868 ~ALL STREE1 dOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION 137136 175o00 213 WA~XE~ KLEEN-LINE CORP ~AXNT SUPPLIES · 137137 325.77 4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES ~ 137138 Z~698.10 637 WEST END U~IFORHS UNX~OR~ SERVICE e 137139 894°86 4116 ~ESTERN POKER SYSTEMS COMPUTER UPGRAOE 137140 957~26 11350 ~ESTIN HOTEL SEATTLE RESERVATIONS e 137141 1~818o32 6099 ~NXTAKER~ RICHARD LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO SACTO ~ 137142 300~00 11348 ~ILL~AMS~ GINA RECREATION REFUNDS 137143 45.00 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE A 137144 554°27 o~ TOTAL ]75~309o86 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-24-99 (9B/99) RUN OATE: 0Z/24/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO W . ~ CHECKm OVERLAP 6077 U.S. IDENTIFICATION MANUAL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 135888~ 58.80- (¢( 135889 - 136275 1075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136276 794.53- <(< 136277 - 136610 5155 U.S. BANK TR~ST LEASE PAYMENT 1366110 64,191.98 <<< 136612 - 136613 1 A A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.,INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 136614 157.03 1098 A. G. ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136615 68~.77 1098 A. G. ENGINEERING PRCF~SSIONAL SERVICES ~ 136616 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 136617 1,471o20 6011 ABC SCHOCL SUPPLY RECREATION REFUND ~ 136618 20.50 7 ABLETRONICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136619 197.92 ~3~7 ACCURATE S~DG. AUTO, TRUCK ~ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 136620 1,71eo27 1~ ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY AIRLINE TICKETS $ 136621 954°00 21126 ADKINS, LAURIE RECREATION REFUND 136622 38.00 5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC. DRGFESSIONAL SERVICES 136623 3,150.00 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS # 13662& 1,272.28 21124 ALIED PHYSICAL THERAPY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1)6625 8.50 21123 ALPINE TREE SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136626 10o00 17 ALTA FIRE E~CIPMENT CO. SERVICE/SUPPLIES ~ 136627 417o72 ~b50 ALTA LOMA PSYChOLOGiCAL ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136628 I20.OO 1~30 AMERICAN aUSINgSS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 136629 513.26 6052 AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT AOVERTISING FEE 136630 796°80 ~92 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION APR MEMBERSHIP DUES e I36631 265.00 21132 ANDERSON, JENNIFER RECREATION REFUND 136632 ~5o00 128a APOLLO INDUSTRIES INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136633 44.83 2~ ARBOR NURSERY INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136634 ~52.55 5807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136635 310 ARROW TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136636 391.13 <(< ~36637 - I3663a 667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ¥ISA MONTHLY BILLINGS ~ 136639 3,72Io89 26 ASSOCIATEO ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136640 Z1133 ATKINSDN, JENNIFER RECREATION REFUNO a 13664! IZS.75 I135 AUTO SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE $ 136642 1,004o06 ~102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ! 136643 2,~65.32 a03 BALDY VIEW PUBLIC/PRIVATE COALITION CL:UT #EETING 13664~ ~05o00 ZI1Z& BARKER, KATHLEEN RECREATION REFUND I36645 45o00 2113½ BARNHOLD, LINDA RECREATION REFUND I36646 20.00 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I36647 51.46 4323 B~LLSOUTH WIRELESS DATA CO#MUNICATION CHARGE # 136648 3,036.03 21127 BENNETT, JENNIFER RECREATION REFUND 136649 ~9o50 4407 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 236650 217.50 481 BLUE SHIELD/CARE AMERICA MEDICAL PREMIUM 13665! 28,647.55 5145 BOSE, RATHiNDRA CASH ADVANCE 136652 ZOODO0 21130 BRAVO, ANTHONY RECREATION REFUND 136653 45°00 4369 BROOART BOOKS LIBqARY SUPPLIES I 136654 445.79 21125 BROOKSTONE TELCaM DEPOSIT REFUND 136655 1,000.00 5341 8UCKNAM & aSSOCIATES CONSULTANT SERVICES 136656 5,083.31 100! BURTRONICS OFFICE SUPPLIES 136657 29.95 4e1Z CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVXCE 136658 4735 CALDLYMPIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136659 56°48 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-24-99 (98/99) I RUN DATE: OZ/Z~/99 ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 1ZZ3 CALSENSE OFFICE/MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT # 136660 27,626.02 6097 CAPSTONE PRESS VICEO NORTHRIOGE EARTHQUAKE a 136661 729°00 3123 CARDKEY SYSTEMS, INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136662 1,943o96 21129 CARNEYp ELAINE RECREATION REFUND 136663 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 13666~ 82.97 21131 CHAPARROp BARBARA RECREATION REFUND 136665 73 CITRUS MOT(RS ONTARIO~ INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 136666 58.36 ?~ CITY RENTALS E~IPNENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES e 136667 1,839o13 ~gll COAST RECREATION~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136668 3073 COLORAMA ~HCLESALE NURSERY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136669 89.7Z Za70 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136610 ZO.¢O ¢30! COMPUSA, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136671 1,883o04 643 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES e 136672 930 CORONA CLAY COHPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 136673 3,771oZ5 5373 COST CONTROL ASSOCIATES MAINTENANCE e 136674 188.65 5349 CREATZVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 136675 ~35o00 <<( 136676 - 136679 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER 015T MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS a 136680 284 OAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 136681 113.35 1291 DATAVAULT - U.S. SAFE DEPOSIT C0. DATA STORAGE 136682 235.75 3659~ DRUM COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE ~USINESS LICENSE REFUND 136683 I~B.7Z 512I DE VOOGHT~ SCOTT d. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 13668& 360°00 36594 DELGADO, ~TEYEN R, qARIA T. DELGADO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 136685 lO.00 ~366 OEMCO, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 136686 Z110 OEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES CLASS ~A# LICENSE 136687 64.00 ~05 DERBISH GUERRA ~ ASSOC. CONTRACT SERVICES a 136688 11,855o00 5809 DIETERICH-POST COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 136689 S36oZ0 8518 DOUBLETREE GUEST SUITES RESERVATIONS e 136690 le718.00 4466 DOUBLETREE H~TEL ~ESE~VaTION FEES 136691 Z48.60 36595 OOWNEY GLASS CORPORATION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136692 Ilogg 365g6 OUNN, MICHELE RECREATION REFUND 136693 38.00 5916 E~ BUILDING MAINTENANCE PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES 136694 3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES # 136695 8~.06 36597 EL RANCHO GRANO~ INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 136696 ZZoBZ 5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136697 Z,138.¢0 36598 ENTENMANN'S CRONEAT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136698 117.Z6 552[ EXPERIAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136699 50.00 ~918 FLORENCE FILTER CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136700 349.08 gO40 ~ORO OF UPLANO~ INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE a 136701 Z,991o86 108Z FRANKLIN COVEY CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 136702 5.56 36599 G-W MANUFACTLRING C~o, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136703 3660Z G.T.E. CALIFORNIA ~USINESS LICENSE REFUND 136704 3356 GARCIA, VIVIAN MILEAGE REIMaURSEMENT 136705 23.25 36600 GEBHART, DEBRA RECREATION REFUND 136706 ZOoO0 36601 GIBBONEY, AGNES RECREATION REFUND 136707 lOoO0 338a GOLDEN 8EAR ARBORISTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES e 136708 27,530.50 365,Z GOMEZ, EDMUNCO DEPOSIT REFUN~ 136709 250.00 1870 GOME[, RICK REIMBURSEMENT 136710 5a.90 509~ GRESSCO LIBRARY SUPPLIES ~ 136711 912.13 5387 GST TELECOM CALIFORNIA INTERNET SERVICES 13671Z 1,060o00 <¢( 136713 - 136714 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-24-92 RUN OATE: 02/24/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMTo ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 137 GtE CALIFORNia MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS i 136715 9,675.97 4~86 GUARDIAN MECICAL PREMIUM 136716 704°00 31278 HANCOCK FABRICS INC. a 1466 BUSINESS LICENSE 136717 5699 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 136718 262o85 31279 HAVEN 6EAUTY SUPPLY & SALON BUSINESS LICENSE 136719 6.50 48~5 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH MONTHLY RENT 136720 1,000.00 31280 HOFFiNGER INCUSTRIES, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 136721 269.22 158 HOLLIDAY RCCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136722 980.98 3128I HONEYWELL-MEaSURER SYSTEMS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 136723 8.20 5577 HOOPS, RODNEY R. MEETING I36724 250°00 I61 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t i36725 I0o70 31282 HUFFMAN, ROY O. ROOF CO. BUSINESS LICENSE 1367Z6 aS.SO 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136727 44.92 4254 IBM CORPCRATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136728 2,61~.64 5804 INACOM COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136729 2,530.00 122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AOYERTISING # 136730 4,010.10 31292 J. MCLOUGHLIN ENGINEERING CO. INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 136731 175 JOBS AVAILABLE ADVERTISEMENTS 136752 309.12 3126! JOHNSON, ANNE RECREATION 236733 30.00 179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN ME£ICAL INSURANCE 136734 41~7 KAMIN ~ aSSOCIATES~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136735 994.13 ~IZa KELLY EQUIPMENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES 136736 22.50 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES ~ 136737 121oU-, 1~9 KING, L.~. PRCFES$IONAL SERVICES ~ 136738 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136739 a~0o75 31301 ~OHN~ SUSAN RECREATION 136740 6090 KGNG, SOPHaK ~USINESS LICENSE REFUND 13674I 360.00 · 982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTiCN C.C.6.G. 135742 31262 KRITZMAN, RUTH RcC~.AIiON 136743 15.00 31~63 LAIKIN, AOL~ RECREATION 13674~ 35.00 339 LAM, JACK LEAGUE ME£TING 136745 250.00 ~47 LASTING IMFRESSI~NS PRINTING CO. M~INTENANCE SUPPLIES 136746 i,SCd.70 ~1284 LAW OFFICE OF P.TIM2THY PITTULLO BUSINESS LICENSE 136747 1~.56 31283 LAW ~FFICE ~F RICARDO A. PEREZ ~USINESS LICENSE 136748 6C.00 31302 LAWSON, JENNIFER RECREATION 1361~9 50.00 367 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES FINANCIAL MGMT. MEETING J 136750 I,~0o00 31~85 LEE, DBN AUT~ SERVICE 6USINESS LICENSE 136751 41.00 5884 LILBURN CBRP~RATION PRGFESSI?N~L SERVICES 136752 2,225.00 ~1286 LINEAR DESIGN/SYSTEMS BUSINESS LICLNSE 136753 2048 LITTLE TIKES COMMERC:AL PLAY SYS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136754 1,442o20 31264 LOPEZ, GRACE RECREATION ~36755 200.00 31287 LUCENT TECHNCLOGIES, INC. 2USINESS LICENSE 136756 46°00 549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENToINCo LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 136757 12~689o47 72 MARK CHRIS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136758 4727 MARSHALL PLUMBING R~H&~. PROGRAM 136759 1,m20.83 31263 MARSHALL, EILEEN RECREAIION 136760 50°00 1125 MC GAPEC MaC~IN£ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136761 I3~.33 31291 MCBRIDE ELECTRIC BUSINESS LICENSE 136762 601.08 51267 M~INA~ NADIA RECREATION 136763 45°00 6108 MERIDIAN OaTa, INC. RECREATION REFUND # 136764 12~705.16 5852 MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES lJ6765 116.94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-24-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 02/2&/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARR. AMT ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 31266 MOCAYO TANYA RECREATION 136766 45.00 31268 MONTEREY PENINSULA HOUSING BUREAU LEAGUE OF CA. CITIES e 136767 778.80 31269 MORAN, SHANNON RECREATION [36768 ~0.00 31288 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 136769 31289 MOUNTAIN VIEW INLANO POOL SUPPLY BUSINESS LICENSE 136770 30.00 31290 MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE B SERVICE INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 13677! 4573 N.I.G.P. ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 136772 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE e 136773 31224 NELSON, SCOTT PHOTOGRAPHY BUSINESS LICENSE 136774 18.60 31293 NEW WORLg ~ECICAL INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 136775 23.68 31270 NEWTON, DESIREE RECREATION 136776 200.00 5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 136777 31271 NIX, LEE RECREATION 136178 433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE a 136779 603.70 <(( 136780 - 136781 523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES e 136782 4,607.57 365 OLD ~UAKER PAINT COMPANY HA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136783 396.29 3429 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 136784 402.99 235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 1367a5 10,968.8~ 14&i PACIFIC BELL MAINTEkANCE SUPPLIES a ~36786 33~ p~c? ?~ EQ~TDT t [g~?~ T[ON, . MAINTEkANCE SUPPLIES 136787 26.98 5981 PARALLEL TECHNOLOGIES MAINTENANCE ~ [36788 690.22 6126 PARDUE PROCUCT[ONS MOB[LE D.J. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 136789 300.00 4,99 PARK SPECIAL[T[ES MAINTENANCE SERVICE [ SUPPLIES 136790 5~09 PARTSMASTER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I36791 ~6.39 31295 PC TECH BdSINESS LICENSE 136792 11.72 31272 PENA, LISA RECREATION e 136793 40.00 31296 PEP BOYS MANkY,MOE & JACK · 631 BUSINESS LICENSE 136794 23.00 31~97 PINKERTON SECURITY SERVICES, INC BUSINESS LICENSE 136795 I0.01 31273 PIPER, KELLIE RECREATION 136736 &60.00 4554 PITASSI, PETER J. ARCMITECTURAL PROJECT # 136797 6,748°72 272 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER RENTAL A 136798 2,I51.29 6089 PITTS, LISA RECREATION REFUND 136799 258°00 255 POMA DISTRIBLTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES e 136800 2,106.26 31298 POMONA VALLEY POOL AND SPA BUSINESS LICENSE 136801 46.41 31274 POPOVA, CLENA RECREATION 136802 45°00 5776 PORAC DUES 136803 340.00 693 POWERSTRIOE BATTERY CO.~ INC. VE~ICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136804 59.17 31275 PRECIADO, SHANNON RECREATION 136805 ~0o00 5316 PRECISION GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 136~06 6.00 31299 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TURF INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 136807 14.37 4B&[ PRESTON, MICHAEL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 136808 30.00 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR # [36809 91.00 65 PRUDENTIAL DYeRALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # I36810 90.62 31276 PULICE, NANCY A. RECREATION 136811 31277 PULVORALAK~ KICHARIN RECREATION 136812 6~o00 3[300 QUALITY FOAM SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE 136813 96.73 251 R & R AUTOPOTIVE VEHICLE MAINT~SUPPLIESgSERVICE A 136814 967.4! 2980 R & S FLOOR COVERING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 136815 418 R M A GROUP SOIL T~STING SERVICES I368X6 365 R.DoO. EGUIPMENT CO MAINT SUPPLIES 136817 I22.77 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LI3T OF WARRANTS FGR PERIOD: 02-Z4-99 C98/99) RUN DATE: 02/2~/9~ PAGE: VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~* CHECKe OVERLAP 264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES # 136818 70 RANCHO CUCAMCNGA CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP MEETING 136819 200.00 11320 RANCHO CUCAMDNGA DENTAL CARE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS I36820 23.00 11321 RANDALLt ALAN RECREATION REFUNDS 136821 45°00 2257 RAUL°S AUTO TRIMt INC. VEHICLE REPAIRS # 136822 243°88 545 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS 136823 375.32 545 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS I36824 124.56 3368 RESOURCE DIRECTORY RESOURCE DIRECTORY 136825 41o66 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS # 136826 153.26 626 ROBLESt RAUL P.t SR. TIRE REPAIR i36827 60.00 11322 ROULEt SHELLY RECREATION REFUNDS 136B28 38.00 301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS ~ERVICE e 136829 303 SAN BERNAROINO COUNTY ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 136830 200.00 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY ~ROOM COl INC MAINT SUPPLIES I36831 689.60 11326 SCHIAVONE, RANCALL RECREATION REFUNDS 136832 52.00 11323 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 136833 28.36 1132~ SCOTTt DAVID RECREATION REFUNOS 136&34 53°00 110S SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES I 136835 436.39 3968 SECRETARY GF STATE FEES 136836 40°00 I829 SHARED TECHo FAIRCHILD TELECOM~ INC TELEPHCNE SERVICES 136837 1~483~33 11325 S!AHAAMt L~NARD RECREATION REFUNDS 13683~ 200.00 250? SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 136839 ~t966.60 2009 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONT. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 136840 I~e99~o46 6092 SMOKE DETECTCRSt TH~ bUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 13684! 317 SO CALIF E~ISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 136842 317 SO CALIF ECISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 1368~3 866°40 319 SO CALIF GAS CO° MONTHL1 GAS BILLS # 136844 3t170-30 ((( I36845 - 136853 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS i 136854 7,BS8.a3 682 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC. VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 136855 66.16 llOZ7 STADIUH SELF STORAGE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 136856 825o00 2847 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT., INC. SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 136857 35t32~o00 5281 STERICYCLEt INCo SHARPS PROGRAM e I3685B liSZT STOCKING, ~NNA RECREATION REFUNDS 136859 613! SUPER PC MEMORY PUgLICATION ~ ~36860 4,463°06 44~5 T ~ G ROOFING SERVICE & SUPPLIES # I36861 7?7.50 4445 T & G ROOFING SERVICE & SUPPLIES 136862 11328 TANECOt CORAZON RECREATION REFUNDS ~36863 2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL ~ 136~64 I09o65 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAINT SUPPLIES # 136865 3242 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE ~ 136B66 523.00 11329 THOMPSONt SCOTT RECREATION REFUNDS 136867 ¢0o00 19~9 TOMARK SPORTS INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 136868 415.75 ~330 TORKELSONt MARJORIE RECREATION REFUNOS 136869 Z$.00 1133! TOYOTA MOTOR SALES INC. RECREATION REFUNDS 136870 450°00 11332 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISORY ASSOC MEMBERSHIP DUES&NTG I3687~ 5988 TRANSTECH ENGINEERSt INC. PROGRESS ESTIMATE ~ 136872 5&55 TYPECARE TYPEWRITER REPAIRS 136873 S9.ZS e558 U.S. GUARDS COo, INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE ~ I36874 3844 U-S. RENTALS RENTAL 136875 365oZ? 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES t 136876 3t606o75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FGR PERIOD: 02-24-99 C98/gg) RUN DATE: 02/24/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORP SERVICES e 136877 587.Z5 55Z0 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS OF CAomINCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136878 1e035.85 1Z26 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE I 136879 87.03 268Z UN[TEO STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 136880 3141 VAN TECH MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136881 11333 VERT~ DEeaIR RECREATION REFUNDS 13688Z 1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES 136883 ((( 136884 - 136884 478 WARREN [ CO.~ CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS e 136885 5,121.40 11337 WATKINS, LEE LEAGUE OF CITIES MEETING 136886 213 WAXIE~ ~LEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES e 136887 1,216.99 11334 WCVA HOUSING SERVICE LOCGING DEPOSIT 136888 200.00 · ~77 WELLS FARGC GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES e 136889 &175 WEST COAST NETTING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 136890 11335 WESTBURNE PIPE & S~PPLY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 136891 6099 WHITAKER~ RICHARD LEGISLATIVE TRIP TC SACTO # 136892 3080 WHITTIER FERTILI[ER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 136893 76~.60 1~336 WOLCE~ ANGIE RECREATION REFUNDS 136894 45°00 509 XEROX CORPCRATiON COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 136895 Z9.IO 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES e 136896 308.65 1510 ZETTERBER~, BOB REIMBURSEMENT 136a97 74.00 ~ TOTAL lm369e569o50 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary February 28, 1999 Par Market Book % of Daya to YTM 360 YTM 365 Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv. Ce ~r~,,,ca{es of Deposit - Bank 8,3t0,532 20 8,310,532 20 8,310,53220 8 99 365 48 5,436 5,512 Local Agency Investment Funds 26,001,719.82 26,001,719.82 26,001,719.82 28.14 I I 5.193 5.265 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 56,015,000.00 55,945,678 50 56,004,615.60 60.61 1,703 1,359 6,025 6.109 Treasury Sacunties - Coupon 2,000,00000 2,006,200.00 1,996,250.00 216 728 518 5.400 5.475 Mortgage Backed Securities 86,185 56 90,21725 81,750.38 008 7,239 2,917 9.447 9579 Total Investments and Averages 92,413,437.58 92,354,347.77 92,394,868.00 100.00% 1,088 842 5.727 5.807 Daya to YTM 360 YTM 365 Cash Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv, PassbookChecking 1,456,953.75 1,456,953 75 1,456,953.75 1,973 2,000 (not ~nc~uded in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 93,870,391.33 93,811,30t .52 93,851,821.75 1,088 842 5.727 5.807 Total Earnings February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 436,121.58 3,606,751.64 Average Daily Balance 93,163,553.36 88,839,865.71 Effective Rate of Ret~ 6.10% 6,10% T as~ I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 7, 1998. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. Portfolio CITY CP Run Date 03/08/~999 - 13 07 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V5 00g City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 1999 Average Purchase Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity CUSIP Inveltment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date CerUficate~ of DelXmit - Bank 243-954720 01013 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 03/18/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.500 5.500 17 03/18/1999 243-954752 01023 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 06/09/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.400 5.400 100 06/09/1999 6509-28649 #32 01012 SANWA 03/0511998 1,000,00000 1,000,000.00 1~000,000.00 5.500 5.500 8 03/09/1999 6509-286,19#33 01014 SANWA 03/1611998 1,810,53220 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 5.400 5400 15 03116/1999 6509-28649 #34 01021 SANWA 05/2611998 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.400 5.400 86 05/2611999 Subtotal and Average 8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20 8,310,532.20 5.436 48 Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 26,001,719.82 26,001,719.82 26,0011719.82 5 265 5.193 1 Subtotal and Average 22,055,291.25 26,001,719.82 26,001,719.82 26,001,719.82 5.193 1 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/27/1997 2,000,00000 2,021,200 O0 2,000,000 00 6 620 6 529 1,122 03/27/2002 31331RDX0 00996 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/17/1997 2,000,000.00 2,036,800.00 1,999,375 00 6.240 6 162 1,234 07117/2002 31331RMS1 01002 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/07/1998 1,000,000.00 1,002,50000 1,000,000.00 6.330 6.243 1,408 0110712003 3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/06/1998 2,000,000.00 2,001,800 00 2,000,000.00 6.220 6135 1,407 01106/2003 31331RUG8 01022 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/27/1998 2,000,000.00 1,998,20000 1,999,37500 6 290 6.211 1,548 0512712003 31331HRC3 01027 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/0611998 1,515,000 00 1,517,87850 1,514,30310 5.500 5.472 155 08/0311999 31331RO65 01036 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/15/1998 2,000,000 00 1,966,200.00 2,000,000.00 5.660 5.582 1,750 12/15/2003 313393VK3 00971 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0311911996 1,000,000.00 1,000,300.00 995,312.50 5.880 5.970 18 03119/1999 313395YK5 00989 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/02/1997 2,000,000.00 2,002,600 00 2,000,000.00 6540 6 450 763 04/02/2001 3133MOTU5 00997 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/30/1997 1,000,000.00 1,005,300.00 1,000,000.00 6 544 6.454 1,247 0713012002 3133M2US4 01003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/06/1998 1,000,000.00 1,000,000 00 1,000,00000 6.230 6.145 1,407 01106/2003 3133M2TM9 01005 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/30/1997 1,000,000.00 1,002,200.00 1,000,00000 6110 6.026 1,033 12128t2001 3133M3KQ7 01011 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/27/1998 2,500,000.00 2,500,00000 2,500,000.00 6.100 6 016 1,094 02/27/2002 3133M4HG1 01019 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/28/1998 2,000,00000 2,002,600.00 2,000,00000 6130 6046 1,184 05/28/2002 3133M5B74 01029 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 08/27/1998 2,000,000 00 2,000,00000 2,000,00000 6 140 6056 1,640 08/27/2003 3133M6NE4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/08/1998 2,000,000.00 1,968,200.00 2,000,000 00 5.530 5 454 1,743 12/08/2003 3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01121/1999 1,000,000.00 983,100.00 1,000,000.00 5.510 5435 1,787 01/21/2004 3134A1LB4 00994 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/25/1997 3,000,00000 3,034,800.00 3,000,00000 6.630 6.537 1,060 01/24/2002 3134A1H45 01000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP 10/22/1997 2,000,00000 2,020,600.00 2,000,000.00 6320 6233 1,331 10/22/2002 3134A2PN2 01030 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 08/20/1998 2,000,00000 1,995,600.00 2,000,00000 6.050 5.967 1,633 08/20/2003 3134A2XJ2 01033 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 11/24/1998 2,000,000.00 1,983,800 00 2,000,000 00 5 790 5711 1,729 11/24/2003 3134A2N20 01037 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 01/14/1999 2,000,000 00 1,982,60000 2,000,000.00 5.600 5 523 1,415 0t/14/2003 31364CRP5 00981 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 11/29/1996 2,000,00000 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6230 6145 1,004 11/29/2001 31364CJ58 00992 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/05/1997 2,000,00000 2,031,800.00 2,000,000.00 7.070 6973 1,164 05/08/2002 31364FC33 01016 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/04/1998 3,000,00000 3,010,200.00 3,000,000.00 6.280 6.194 1,526 05/05/2003 ~,t Portfolio CITY CP Run Date 0310W1999 - 13 07 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5 00g City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 1999 Average Purchase Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 1,995,60000 2,000,00000 6.125 6.041 1,540 05/19/2003 31364GBE8 01032 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 10/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,966,200.00 2,000,000.00 5.670 5592 1,680 10/06/2003 31364GJM2 01034 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 12/01/1998 2,000,000.00 1,964,400.00 2,000,000.00 5 520 5444 1,736 12/01/2003 31364GTJ8 01039 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/11/1999 4,000,00000 3,951,200.00 3,996,250.00 5.860 5.801 1,808 02/11/2004 Subtotal and Average 59,291,669.17 56,015,000.00 55,945,678.50 56,004,615.60 6.025 1,359 Treasury Securities - Coupon 9128274M1 01026 TREASURY NOTE 08/03/1998 2,000,00000 2,006,200.00 1,996,250.00 5.375 5.400 518 07/31/2000 Subtotal and Average 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 2,006,200,00 1,996,250.00 5.400 518 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 02/23/1987 12,520 62 12,792 32 12,430.58 8 000 8 219 1,037 01/01/2002 31360BJ21 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 09/15/1987 54 134 30 57,25244 50,006 56 8 500 !0 0!8 4,202 09/01/20!0 36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 06/23/1986 18,015.03 18,602 32 17,7~7 32 8.500 8.778 803 05/12/2001 36215XZS4 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 05/23/1986 1,515 61 1,57017 1,54592 9.000 8.547 745 03/15/2001 Subtotal and Average 85,178.41 86,185.56 90,217.25 81,750.38 9.447 2,917 Total Investments end Average 91,738,921.03 92,413,437.56 92,354,347.77 92,394,868.00 5.727 042 ~ Portfolio CITY CP Run Date 03/08/1999 - 13 07 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRe~! V5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash February 28, 1999 Average Purchase Stated YTM 360 Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Checking/Savings Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 1,456,953,75 1,456,953 75 2 000 1 973 1 Cash Subtotal and Average 1,424,632.32 1,456,953.75 0 Total Cash and Inveatmenta 93,163,553.36 93,870,391.33 93,811 ,$01 ,$2 93,851,821.75 8.727 842 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date 03/08/1999 - 13 07 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V500g Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type Page 5 February 1, 1999 through February 28, 1999 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Sales/Maturities Ending CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Certificates of Deposit - Bank Subtotal 8,310,532.20 8,310,$32.20 Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5265 8,000,000,00 t ,000,000 00 Subtotal 19,001,719.82 8,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 26,001,719.82 Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 2000 2,143,00000 2,007,000 00 Subtotal 1,320,953.75 2,143,000.00 2,007,000.00 1,456,953.75 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RPZ2 01008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 6 140 0210511999 0.00 2,500,000 00 31331RYP4 01028 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 6 130 02/11/1999 0 00 2,000,00000 3133MSFX3 01031 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 6 000 02/26/1999 0 00 2,000,000 00 3134A14F4 01009 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 6.160 02/18/1999 000 2,000,000.00 3134A14R8 01010 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 6 135 02/1911999 0.00 1,000,000 00 31364GTJ8 01039 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 5860 02/11/1999 3,996,250 00 000 Subtotal 61,508,365.60 3,996,250.00 9,500,000.00 56,004,615.60 Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 1,996,250.00 1,996,250.00 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 8000 02/16/1999 0.00 86454 31360BJ21 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8500 02/26/1999 0 00 441.40 36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 8500 02/1611999 0.00 4,738,14 36215XZS4 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9000 02/16/1999 0 00 60.65 Subtotal 87,855.11 0.00 6,104.73 81,750.38 Total 92,225,676.48 14,139,250.00 12,513,104.73 93,851,821.75 ~"'~, Portfolio CITY CP Run Dale 03/08/1999. 13 07 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V5 00g c4ttto~tA DROPPING PARTNER YES .... NO_ _ APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number .............. 351264 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Receipt Number ......... 1222646 Riverside, CA 92501 Geographical Code ........ 3615 (909) 782-4400 Copies Mailed Date 2-23-99 Issued Date Name of Business: ROCKY'$ PIZZA Location of Business: Number and Street 9615 POOTHILL BLVD City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCA~IONGA CA 91730 County SAN BERNARDINO Is premise inside city limits? YES ~= premise licensed: ~pe of license Transferor's names/license: HERNANDEZ LISA C 340470 Llcense ~/oe Transaction ~,.~ ~ ~D~ Master DuD Date Fee 1. 41 O~-SALE BEER ~D W PERSOn; TO PERSOn; TRA~;S N;, YES 0 FEB 23,i999 $150.00 : 2. 41 O~;-SA~E BE~R ~D W ~UAL FEE N;, YES 0 FEB 23,1999 $205.00 : 3. 41 O~;-SALE BEER ~4D W STATE FINGERPRIntS N;, NO 2 FEB 23,1999 ~78.00 TOTAL Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of ~he Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? N O Act, or regulations of the Departmen~ ~erca~n~ng to the Act? N O Exp'ain any 'Yes' answer ~o the above que~;on~ on an d%~ac~men~ wh~c~ sha~[ be deemed par~ of Applicant agrees (a) ~ha~ any manager emgloyed in on-sale licensed premxse wxll have all ~he ~alif~ca~ions cf a l~censee, and (b) ~ha~ he will no~ v~ola~e o~ cause or permit to be v~ola~ed any of ~he provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Ac~. STATE OF CALIFORNIA county of s~ B~DINO Date FEB 23,X999 Applicant Name(s) Applican~ Signature(s) ~~: 227 & 231 ~.BC 211 /2' Rocky's Pizza 9615 Foothill Blvd. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO TERRACE CENTER 9583 Application: Type 41, On-Sale Beer & Wine Applicant: Hong Hyo Sock & Hong Sung Kee Address: 9615 Foothill Blvd, 9 585 Description: Annual renewal/Transfer ownership of beer and wine license Site and Surrounding Zonin(~ Site: Commercial Office/Foothill Specific Plan 9587 North: Community Commercial/Foothill Specific Plan South: Low Medium Residential District (4-Sdu/ac) East: Special Commercial/Foothill Specific Plan West: Community Commercial/Foothill Specific Plan 9589 ~T~- · ' rlcQ] 9~,(lc, 9f;,fl') ')¢, I I 9F~ ] ~ 9621 9625 c~Ltfo~,~ DROPPING PARTNER YES NO APPL I ERTl ON FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE L I CENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number .............. 351021 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Receipt Number ......... 1221580 Riverside, CA 92501 Geographical Code ........ 3615 (909) 782-4400 Copies Mailed Date 2/16/99 Issued Date 3/~]~ . Name of Business: STEER N STEIN CUCAMONGA . Location of Business: - Number and Street 8348 ARCHIBALD City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 9'1730 County SAN BERNARDINO Is premise inside' city limits? Y E S If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: NARCISO ANTONIO 190147 ~ Transaction Type Fee 3'f~e Master DuD Da~e 1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 FEB 16.1999 $150.00 : 2. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 FEB 16,1999 $205.00 : 3. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO 3 FEB 16,1999 $117.00 TOTAL $472.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated a~y provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Acl? N O Explain any 'Yes' answer to ~ above quesOons on an alta(::~,me~t which Shall be deemed pa~ of tt~ ap~icatio~. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of Ihe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date FEB 1'6,1999 Under penally of I:)equry. each peach wfioae signature a,opeam belOw. ce~llfiea in~ says: (1) He is an a0pllcanl. or one of Ihe al:~:;llcanta. or an a,,acutlve officer of applicant CO~l:;Oralion. named in [he forgoing al~,l~#Catlon. duly au#'~ortz~:~ to make Ibis al:~;lloatlon on its behalf; (2) Ihal he has read Ihe toregoing and know~ contents thereof and ~et sect1 of the el;ova alatemsn~ Ill~t~n made, era 111Je; (3) tiler no ~f'aon otl'~r than lbs I~:;licanl or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the aliitrent or applicanl'a bua, lnsss to be conducted under the llcectae(11) for wfiich this sOWIcallon is made; (4) that the transfer aOpllcation or prol:x)aed Iran$1er is nol made Io Saliafy the payment of e loan or to fulfill an egreemenl ~l~'ed into more than ninel¥ (gO) (lays preceding the day on which the transfer aol~licat,on is filled w*,h ih® Det~,imenl or Io gain or ~111al;il~l I I~'Wer~qce Io or for any creditor or translator or Io ~efraud or inlure any cr~:~itor of transferor; (5) Ihal the transfer may be wttl'~raw~ by sifter the ap~olicant or the licenses with no raaulting llatXlily fo I~e Depadmenl. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) STEER'N STELE CUCAMONG,~ I1~ /') ,% --. ABC 231 A~ached ' ' '/ ' " 'ABC 227 to Follow: NO ESCROW ABC 211 (4/9S) Steer N Stein 8348 Archibald Application: Type 41. On Sale Beer & Wine ~ , / Applicant: Antonio Narciso. Jr. · - Address: 8348 Archibald Ave. i ', : Description: Annual renewal/Transfer ownership t i of beer and wine license : ~ Site and Surrounding Zonin~i .... ~ Site: Office Professional District North: Low Residential District (2-.4du/ac) ~ i South: Low Residential District (2-4du/ac) I I i East: Low Residential District (2-4du/ac) .............. l ~ i i West: Office Professional District ~ ! n- / .....- -parcels ~ ~ ~ /'~ Street Centlines I · ' N 0.05 0 0.05 O. 1 Miles STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. l)ycr, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAl, TO AUTII()RIZE TIlE ADVERTISING OF TIlE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR Till! 1998/99 ADA ACCESS RAMPS AND [SRIVEWAYS PROJECT TO MEET TIlE AMERICANS WITtl DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) STANDARDS GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG ARCIIIBALD AVENUE FROM 6rH STREET '!'O NORTI I OF BASE LINE RD., TC) BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 16-4637-9106, 10-4637-9804 AND a_-46~7-980.4 RECOM M EN!)AT! Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and spccitications lbr the 1998/99 ADA Access Ramps and Driveways project to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards generally located along Archibald Avenue, fi'om 6'~' Street to north of Base Linc Rd., and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACK(; R()UNI)/A NAI,YSIS: The City has developed a six-year Transition Plan to bring City thcilitics into conlpliancc with ADA guidelines. The current im~jcct will construct or reconstruct ramps and driveways pursuant to the Transition Plan. The project will bc fimdcd l?om three separate accounts: TI)A Article 3 limds (Account No. 16-4637- 9106). Proposition 111 timds (Account No. 10-4637-9804)and Measure "l" funds (Account No. 32-4637- 9804). Staff' has dctcrm incd that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) or the C EQA guidelines. The prqjcct plans and specifications have bccn completed by staf'l'and approved by tl~c City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $I15,000 including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $2,200 required For Construction Administration which inch]des advertising, printing and survey. Legal advertising is scheduled tbr March 23, 1999 and March 30, 1999, with a bid opening nt 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 13, 1999. Rcspcctfidly submitted, City Engineer WJO:JAD:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution EXHIBIT "A" VICINITY MAP [..f: ~ ~ FOOTHILL BNSF RR ~ 6TH ST z ~"~~ 1998/99 ADA Ramps and Driveways Various Locations A R. ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl, OF Tl[ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING I'LANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "1998/99 ADA ACCESS RAMPS AND DRIVEWAYS CONSTRUCTION" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TI-IE CITY CI,F, RK TO ADVERTISE TO RECI:~IVE BIDS WIIEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications tbr the construction o f certain improvements. NOW, TH EREFORE, BE IT RES()LVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucanmnga bc and arc bcrcby approved as the plans and specifications tbr the "1998/99 ADA Access Ramps and Driveways Construction." BE IT FURTHER RESOI,VED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law [br the receipt of scaled bids or proposals lbr doing the xvork specified in the atbresaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the tBIlowing words and figures, to wit: "NO'I'ICI~ INV'ITIN('~ SEAI,I':;D BIDS OR IqU)P()SAI,S" l~ursuant to a Resolution of'the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Calilbrnia, directing this notice, NO'I'!CI~ IS [ II~REBY GI VI~N that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices ol'thc City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or bclbrc the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 13, 1999, scaled bids m' proposals For the "!998/99 AI)A Access Ramps and l)rivcways Construction" in said City. Bids will bc publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Calitbrnia 91730. Bids must bc made on a lbrm provided tbr the purpose, addressed to the City o ~ Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the 1998/99 ADA Access Ramps and Driveways Construction". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages For holiday and overtime work. [11 that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations o['thc State of Calilbrnia is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies ot'such prevailing rates o['pcr diem wages arc on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City ot'Rancbo ()tlcalllOllga, [0500 Civic Center l)rivc, Rancho CtlcalllOllga, Califi>rnia, and arc available to any interested party (m request. Tbc Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy o[' such ticterminations to bc posted at the job sitc~ l~ursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall lbrlDit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than filly dollars ($50.00) fi~r each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed tbr each calendar day or portion thorcoL i l'such laborer, workman or mechanic RESOLUTION NO. MARCH 17, 1999 PAGE 2 is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein bctbrc stipulated lbr any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontraclor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administcrs the apprenticeship program-in that trade lbr a certificate of approval. The certificate will also iix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the perlbrmance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to.journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to live except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of }5 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number ofapprcnticcs in training in the arca exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or !). When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average ol' not less than one apprentice to eight .jotlrllcytllcn. 'I'hc Contractor is required to makc contributions to t~mds established Ibr the administration of apprenticeship programs if hc employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public xvorks site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections ! 777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. h~formation relative to apprenticeship standards. wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-ott]cio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or fi'om the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work lbr all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and bc governed by the laws of the State of Cali~Brnia having to do with working hours as set forth in I)ivision 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the I,abor Code of the State of Calitbmia as anlcndcd. The Contractor shall tbrlUit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) tbr each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution ofthc contract, by him or any subcontractor trader him, upon any of the work herein bctbrc mentioned, tbr each calendar day during which said laborer, ~vorkman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said I,abor Code. RESOLUTION NO. MARCH 17, 1999 PAGE 3 Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments arc defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance xvith Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's chcck, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucmnonga Ibr an amount equal to at least I (}% el'the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of fi~ilure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, ccrti fled check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cttca~l~onga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City el'Rancho Ctlcanlonga to the diflbrencc between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if'any shall bc returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to bc given to secure a titithl~tl pcrlbrmancc of the contract tbr said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereot~ and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price lbr said work shall be given to secure the payment el'claims tbr any materials or supplies ti~rnished tbr the pcrtbrmancc of the work contracted to bc done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also bc required to lkmfish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Ct~camonga the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered 15'ore a ('ontractor to xvhonl a proposal l~,rnl has not been issued by the City of Rancho CtlcalllOllga. Contractor shall possess rely and all contractor licenses, in lbrm and class as required by any and all applicablc laws with respect to any and all ot'thc work to bc perlimned under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" I,iccnsc ((ionoral Engineering Contractor) or a "C8" Specialty License (Concrete Contractor) in accordance with the provisioas of the Contractor's I,iccnsc l,aw (CalitBrnia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 ct. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "Calitbrnia Business and Prot~ssions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty ofpcEju~, that the intbrmation being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Ot'ficc ot'thc City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Calitbrnia. Copies of the plans aad specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer. will bc timfished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucanlonga, and payment of $35.00 (TI !iRTY-FIVE [)OI,I,ARS), said $35.00 ('I'i I[R'['Y-FIVI5 I)()I,LARS) is non refundable. lJpon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and spccilScations will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated i~bovc, together with an additional non rcimbursablc payment of$15.00 (FIFTIiliN I)()I.I,ARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The succcssl~l bidder will bc required to enter into a contract satisfi~ctory to the City of Rancho Cticanlo~lga. RESOLUTION NO. MARCH 17, 1999 PAGE 4 In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set tbrth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to bc done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (pcrfimnancc retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the riglit to reject any or all bids. By order o£ the Council of the (-'it5' of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali[brnia. Dated this 17't' day of March, 1999. Publish Dates: March 23, 1999 and March 30, 1999 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Cotmcil of the City of Rancl'to Cucanionga, Calitbrnia, this 17'h day of March, 1999. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTI.~S'I': Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Ct.camonga, Calilbrnia, do hereby ccrtit~y that the tbregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of tile City of Rmicho Cucamonga, Calilbmia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17'h day of March, 1999. Executed this17th clay of March, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, Calilbrnia. !)cbra .I. Adams. £YMC, City Clerk AI)VERTISE ON: March 23, 1999 and March 30, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 7368 ARCHIBALD (RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY), AND 10.75 ACRES SOUTH OF FOOTHILL AND EAST OF ROCHESTER (SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION PARKING LOT) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Resolutions accepting the above-described properties from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and authorize the Mayor to sign documents necessary to execute the transfer. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In 1993, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the purchase and directed improvements to two properties. Approximately 10.75 acres on the south side of Foothill and east of Rochester, was purchased to provide additional parking for the Sports Complex. Additionally, a 22,000 square foot building on 1.1 acres was purchased to provide library services for the community. Improvements to both properties have been completed. As anticipated in the development plans, the Agency may now transfer title of the properties to the City. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director ,. j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ACCEPTING EXCESS REMNANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7368 ARCHIBALD (RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. Recitals. (i) After the conclusion of certain improvement projects, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency realized it has excess real property that could properly be utilized by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (ii) The City of Rancho Cucamonga can make beneficial use of the subject real property in furtherance of the City Library. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, detertnined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, hereinabove. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to accept the real property conveyed by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. RESOLUTION NO. ~-L9o'~o~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ACCEPTING EXCESS REMNANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL, EAST OF ROCHESTER (SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION PARKING LOT) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. Recitals. (i) After the conclusion of certain improvement projects, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency realized it has excess real property that could properly be utilized by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (ii) The City of Rancho Cucamonga wants to make beneficial use of the subject real property in relation to the Sports Complex. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, hereinabove. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to accept the real property conveyed by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane Young, Records Coordinator SUBJECT: Destruction of City iRecords RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction o£ City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction requests are from Personnel, Purchasing and Administration and have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and also comply with applicable Government codes. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representatives, the Department Heads and the City Attorney. DMY (Attachments as noted) RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records of the City Manager's Office, M.I.S., Personnel and Purchasing Divisions have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes: WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Resolution No. 99-*** Page 2 SECTION 2' That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of March, 1999 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of March, 1999. Executed this 18th day of March, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Exhibit A (1) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destro)' Paper Records and/or Documents I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (ARMS); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual ARMS generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/'Yr) Schedule when applicable) ,/ Department A~prq~al City Attorney Approval (if required) Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signa, ture Date Exhibit A (2) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: MIS Requestor: Debbie Espinosa I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (ARMS); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual ARMS generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) Department Approval . City Attorney Approval (if required) Signature Date Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date R.M Revised 11/98 Exhibit A (3) THE ~'[i!' I)F RAN/Nt,) tTUCAMONGA DATE; 12/29~ [AGE: TIME: 12:01:86 The following records are due for destruction pursuant to the City's records retention schedule. Please review the list and initial next to each box approved for destruction. If operational or legal require- ments mandate a hold, submit written justification for a 6-month ext. BILh TO DEPARTMENT: 4124 RECOR[3!~COO~['lNATO[~: F[ ilN, MARY DEPART: ,1124 DEFT NAME: PERS©NNEL MAiL SORT PHONE: i9093477 2700 EXT: 2056 MARK RECORD TITi,E NAME DA['ES ()I~ PERMANENT RECORDS CTR DESTROY RETRIEVAL BOX (X) EVENT (BOX CONTENTS) BEGINNING ENDrN.i Hold ? BOX NO LOCATI©N Space 12 1998 DATE SENT TO: i_l M INDIVIDUAL PERS©~4EL FOLDERS 01/01/90 Folder ~ I P~STINE, CHERYL 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 2 BOAK. JACQUELYN 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 3 ER.MqS@N, BRI~J 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 4 BROWN, JEANNETTE 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 5 CABRINItA, BONNIE 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 6 CA!N, KATHY 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ ? CALZADA, C~4DY 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 8 CHP4,1, RICK 0i/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 9 COCHRan, GREGORY 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 10 CONROY, CARI 0~/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ i1 CULLER, AMY 01/01/90 !2/31/90 Folder ~ 12 DINH, THOAI 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 13 FARMER, JAMES 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 14 FLOWERS, SONJA 0i/©1/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 15 FORSYFH. SCOTT 01/01/90 12/31/30 Folder g 16 GARDNER, DONALD 01/01/90 12/21/90 Folder ~ 11 GRAVEL, JEFF 01/01/90 ~2/3i/90 Folder ~ 18 ~LL, CECELIA 01/01/90 12/31/30 Folder ~ 19 HOFFMAN, DEBORAH 01/01/90 ~2/31/90 Folder g 20 HORNER, BRETT 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 21 HUTT, DENISE 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 22 JAVOR, PATSY 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 23 JOHNSON. CHRISTOPHER 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 24 MEATON, ROGER 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 25 LEONARD. DAVE; 01/01/9~ 22/31/90 Folder ~ 26 ~CKEY, C~RLES 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 27 ~GUIRE, RUSSELL 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder g 28 MILLER, THEO~RE 01/01/90 22/3~/90 Folder ~ 29 PRICE, PATRICK 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 30 PROVINS, CAROLYN 01/01/90 12/~1/90 Folder ~ 31 ~DTKE, KELLIE 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 32 ~TLIFF, EVA 01/01/90 12/tl/90 Folder ~ ~3 RIVERA, ALVIN 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 34 ROBERT, LYLE 01/01/90 ~2/~!/90 Oate ~tiY KUHN, t~ I.ES D,~te I,ARRY TEMiLE, DEFT HEAD L>~lte Jl~! P.MdekblAN, t. kl'[ hl'i'f ~li{E ':i]'I'Y OF ~{NCHO CUC~%MONGA PAGE: 2 DATE: 12/29/98 TIME: 12:0]:09 The following records are due fo: destruction pursuant to the City's records retention schedule. Please review the list and initial next to each box approved for destruction. If operational or legal require- ments mandate a hold, submit wrizten justification for a 6-month ext. (X! EVENT (BOX CONTENTS) BEGIIiNI~.; E~iDfNG Hold ? BOX NO. LOCATION Space 12 1998 BATE SENT T(3: Folder ~ 35 SANTOS, JOHN 01/01/90 12/il/90 Folder ~ 36 SHANE, LAWRENCE 01/01/90 Folder ~ ]7 SINCLAIR, VICKI 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ ]8 SMITH, PAUL 01/01/90 12/]1/90 Folder ~ ~9 STUKEY, CYNTHIA 01/01/90 12/31/90 Folder ~ 40 WOLINSKY, WILLI~{ 01/01/90 12/]1/'90 Folder ~ 41 WOO, FARIN 01/01/90 12/317'90 Folder ~ 42 &a*******MICROFILMED ON 7/98******** 01/01/90 12/31/90 M INDIVIDUAL PERSONNEL FOLDERS 01/01/91 ]2/{!/91 993 12 02 01 1 12 1998 Folder ~ 1 ABBOTT, BRUCE C1/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 2 BARBA, JOY 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 3 BOLECHOWSKI, SCOTT 01/01/91 12/31/91 Fokder ~ 4 BRUNSON, DI~4E 0!/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 5 CUMMINGS, PATRICIA 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 6 CUTBBERTSON, GAlL 0]/01/'91 ]2/31/91 Folder ~ 7 DALEY, KRISTINE 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 8 DAVIS, ROBERT 01/01/9~ 12/~1/91 Eolder ~ 9 DAY, RANDY 0!/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 10 DICK, DAVID 01/01/91 12/3!/91 Folder ~ 11 ENGLE, WENDY 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 12 ENTLER, CAROL 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 13 GILBERTSON, JEANNE 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 14 GUERRA. RAMONA 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 15 }~CKWORTH. SCOTT 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 16 HANSEN, BRIAN 0]/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 17 t~NSEN, CHRISTOPHER ,31/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 18 HART, ERIC 01/0]/91 12/~1/91 Folder ~ 19 KOREY, MEGAN ~/0~/91 ]2/31/9l Folder ~ 20 LEVESQUE, MIKE 0[/01/9i 12/31/91 Folder ~ 21 LUNDIN, ;GINOLD 01/01/91 12~l/91 Folder ~ 22 MARTIN. GAYLE 01/01/91 12/31/91 Foldel ~ 23 MEYER, JASON 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 24 MITCHELL, SAMUEL 0i/01/91 12/31/91 Folder- ~ 25 MITTLEHAUSER, CATHERINE 01[/01/91 12/31/91 Folder- ~ 26 MOORE, LORI 01/0]/91 12/31/9! Date: MARY KUHN. H~IAN RES Da~e ],ARR'f£I£I.11H~E, DE[:THEAD D,~te: JiM ~,IAI<I<MAN, tTi"f Aii'Y !HE 22TY OF P~N{iHO CUO~MONGA res t rhlcl ](2,[~ NoL i f i ca L ion Report i'AGE: 3 DATE: 12/29/ l)~ TIME: 12:'8!: ~2 The fellewing recerds are due fer destructien pursuant ~e the City's records retention schedule. Please review the list and initial next te each box appreved for destruction. If eperational er legal require- ments mandate a held, submit written justificatien fer a 6-menth ext. BILL TO DEPARTMENT: 4124 RECORDS COCRDINATOR KIHN, DEPART: 4124 DEPT N~E: ~:E~SONN~L HAIL SOR~: PHONE: (909}477-2700 EXT: 2056 M~RK RECORD TITLE N~ME DATES On ~ER~ENI RECORDS CT9 DESTROY RETRIEVAL ~OX (X EVENT (~OX CONTENTE~ BEGINNING ENDING HOkl ? BOX ~O LOCATION Space 12 1999 DATE SENT TO: Folder ~ 27 PAYNE, KENNETH 01/01/91 12/~I/91 Folder ~ 28 POKORNY, JENNETTE Ck/01/91 ~o]~er ~ 29 REED, T~H 01/01/91 Rolder ~ 30 ~IFFEL, ~ATRICIA (',1/01/91 12/31/91 ~older ~ t2 ~OUMELIOTIS, DOREEN 01/01/91 12/]1/91 Folder ~ 32 SALGADO, OELBERT 01/01/91 Poller ~ B~ SAYLOR, J~ES 01/01/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 34 SCAFUTO, ~REN 01/01/91 12/31/9! Folder ~ 35 SIMPSON, NICHET 01/'01/91 12,/~1/91 Folder ~ B6 THO~S, ~N 01/01/91 12/31/9~ Folder ~ 37 TUTTLE, STEP}~iE 01/0i/91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 38 TUTTLE, AMY 01/01/91 12/~1/91 Folder ~ 39 VALLES, CECILIA 0~/0//91 12/31/91 Folder ~ 40 VE~BURGT, ~ON 01/01/91 ~ol~er ~ 41 WARE, ~IE 01/01/9! 12/31/91 Folder ~ 42 WATSON, WENDY 01/01/91 12/31/91 ~_~ D PERSO.EL RECRUITMENT 11/01/90 01/30~91 705 12-02 03 1 0! 1998 Folder ~ 1 ~4AGEMENT ~ALYST I ...11 90 . ~0 6 ~/01/90 01/30/91 Folder ~ 2 OFFICE SPECIALIST I & I] 11 9~.3 90 6 i1/01/90 01/30/91 Folder ~ 3 P~S EX~INER .... 01 91 . 90 6 ]~./01/90 0!/30/91 Folder ~ 4 SR P~NS EX~INER BLDG. 01 9! 9,~ % 11/01/90 01/30/91 ~_~ D PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT 05/01/86 ~ ]/}~'9] ~C, 7 12 02 02 2 0l 1998 Folder ~ 1 ASSIST~T BLDG OFFICIAL .... 01 91 . .}0 5 05/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ 2 ASSIST~T P~ER 10- 90, . 90 5 05/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ ] COMPUTER INTE~ .... 02 88..90-5 05/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ 4 GENE~L OFFICE .... 05 86. ,90.5 05/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ 5 LIFEGUARD .... 02 88...90 5 C5/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ 6 ~INTEN~CE WORKER. 10 90.. ~O 5 05/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ 7 RECREATION LE~ER.. 05 90 90 ~ 05/01/86 01/30/91 Folder ~ 8 SR ~INT. WORKER, · 12-89 , .90 5 05/01/86 01/30/91 ~ [} PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT 01/01/~1 ]1/3~] ~] 989 09 0{ 03 4 ~1 !998 Folder ~ ~ TITLE ................... L~A1E BOX 01/01/91 11/~0/91 Folder ~ 2 PARK ACQUISITION SUPERVISOR 0[ ~ : .91 1 01/01/91 11/30/91 Folder ~ 3 CUSTODI~ ............. 04 9l 91 ] 01/01/91 11/30/91 Folder ~ 4 ASST POOL ~AGER ......... 05 ~ . 9i i 01/01/91 11/30/91 '~ : MARY KUHN, H~ RES. ['~te: LARRY '1 ~:iMPIE, DEFT}lEAD Dat{~: d iH r~}Kl'MAII, CI iY All Y j7 THE (21 ["~'!'F }~.A~(i'HO CU(f~IONGA ~'AGE: 4 DATE: 12/29/98 TIME: 12:01:16 The following records are due fo:z- destruction pursuant to Lhe City's records retention schedule. Please revzew the list and initial next to each box approved for desk:ruction. If operational or legal require- menCs mandate a hold, submit written justification for a 6-month ext. BILL TO DEPARTMENT; 4124 RECORDS CO(RDI~AT~R: K~tHN, DEPART: 4124 DEPT NAME: ~:ERSOI~EL HAlL S(R'2: f:HOllE '9091~47~ '27:2,0EXT: 20~6 MA~K R~CORD TITLE N~E OAFEh[ (l}~] PERCENT REC(3RDS :ltTR [i:ESTRCY RETRIEVAL gOX (X' EVENT (BOX CONTENTS) BEGI~[~,. E~JDi~G Hold '? BOX NO LOCA'['iON Spa:e 12 1998 [i'hTE SENT TO: Folder ~ 5 LIFEGUARD ................. 1'5,1 91 {1/01/91 11/30/91 Folder ff 6 ~INT S[IPERVISOR ......... ,,~"l . . 91 i 01/01/91 ]l/l~0/9l Folder ~ 7 INTEG~ITED WASTE COORD [0 t.1 91 ] el/01/91 Folder ~ 8 SR ~INT WORKER ............... ]] 91 . .9] ] 01/01/91 Folder ~ 9 CROSSING GUARD ........... ALl 9][] 01/01/91 !1/]0/91 Date: ~RY KUHN, ~ RES Da, e: [,ARRY TEMPLE, ~EPT HEAD Date: JIM b~RKbIAN, CITY ATTY ELI'~',IBLE BOXES Ot~ I~CLD = 0 ~9OXES NEEDING ~O BE ~ETU~ED FOR [:ES'I't<UC~TI(N = BOXES TO gE DESTROYED for this DEPAI..I'MEt~[' ,',i:;cl ~dii:: :;h]>se '['q! BE RE I'IJRNED, but not Exhibit A (4) CITY OF RANCHO CUC.~VIONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents Department: Admin. Svcs/~rchasinq Requestor: Joan Kruse ! have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed. These records have not been stored in the City's Records Center and are not listed in the City's Automated Records Management System (ARMS); therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual ARMS generated destruction process. Description of Records / Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records / Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) .Purchase Orders 6c~o.~ Ju~y 1, 1994 - June 30, 1996 Department Approval City Attorney Approval (if required) Date Signature Date Council Approval Date (if required) Destroyed by: Signature Date RM. Revised 11/98 IAFt RE[ ()RI DATE: March 17 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Authorizing the City to Obtain State Summary Criminal History Information to Expedite Process of Employment Background Investigations RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City to obtain from the California Department of Justice summary criminal history information of employees and volunteers. BACKGROUND The City's personnel system operates on the basis of merit appointments to employment. Criminal history information is one component used in the background screening of applicants in addition to written aptitude tests, oral interviews, physical examinations and, in some cases psychological tests for sworn officers. Currently the Personnel Department conducts background investigations that utilize finger prints and criminal history data. This sometimes takes several months to obtain access information. Direct access to the auto:mated information system at the State would expedite background investigations needed for employees background checks. This resolutions,provides standards in accessing information, strict record security, and disclosure of criminal history information, is required by the State Department of Justice to enable access to automated criminal history information on employment applicants and volunteers on a more timely basis. This will improve the City's personnel recruitment and selection process. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director RESOLUTION NO. qq- & ~ q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO OBTAIN STATE SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION TO EXPEDITE PROCESS OF EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS WHEREAS, Penal Code Section t 1105 (b) (10) authorizes the City to access state summary criminal history information for the purpose of screening employees and volunteers; and WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 11105 (b) (10) requires the City to exclude from employment or volunteer activities persons with certain criminal histories; and WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 11105 (b) (10) requires the City Council to authorize specified personnel to have access to summary criminal history information for the purpose of screening employees and volunteers; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Personnel Officer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby given authority to obtain summary criminal background information from the California Department of Justice for the purpose of screening employees and volunteers; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga hereby instructs the Personnel Officer to enact policies and procedures which will govern the administration of received criminal history infi)rmation and which meet the requirements of the State of California, Department of Justice, Bureau o:f Criminal Identification and Information, Field Operations and Record Security Section for any agency that maintains or receives criminal history information. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,1999 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor z// CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE REPLACEMENT CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN FROM GOOD CHEVROLET OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, THROUGH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, PROCUREMENT DIVISION, 1999 CONTRACT, 1-99-23-20, IN THE AMOUNT OF OF $20,476.82 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 72-4245-7045. RECOMMENDATION Purchasing recommends that the City Cormell authorize the purchase of one (1) Chevy Astro Van kom Good Chevrolet from Alahneda, California through the State of' California Vehicle Contract, 1-99-23-20 in the amount of $ 20,476.82 funded kom account 72-d245-70d5 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This vehicle is a replacements tbr current a vehicle which has exceeded its service life. The unit and asset number for replacement are as follows: I;nil 235 (asset #974) The Purchasing Department selected the State of California, Procurement Division, 1999 contract as the best possible fleet pricing option fbr the approved vehicle. The specifications outlined in the contract meet the requirements defined by the departments and can be acquired from Good Chevrolet of Alameda, California. Respectfully submitted, WJO:dkh (~ii Y (~t~ I~ANCI 1() Cl i(;AMON(iA ;!(FAFF RE'PORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE TEN (10) REPLACEMENT CHEVROLET BLAZERS AND ONE (1) CHEVY EXPRESS PASSENGER VAN FROM CREST CHEVROLET OF SAN BERNARDINO~ CALIFORNIA, THROUGH A PIGGY BACK PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IN THE AMOUNT OF IN THE AMOUNT OF $253,986.21 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 72-4245- 7045. RECOMMENDATION Purchasing recommends that the City Cotmcil authorize the purchase of eleven (11) vehicles from Crest Chevrolet through a piggy back purchase agremnent with the County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, California in the amount of $ 253~986.21, funded from account 72-4225-7045. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS All eleven vehicles are replacements for current vehicles which have exceeded their service life. The unit and asset numbers for replace~nent are as [bllows: Unit 208 (asset #978) [!nit 218 (asset #1247) Unit 222 (asset #1157) Unit 223 (asset #1156) Init 326 (asset #963) Unit 327 (asset #1159) Unit 330 (asset #1255) l!nit 334 (asset #1251) [Jnit 412 (asset # 1348) Unit 716 (asset # 1320) I~ nit 9113 (asset # 1250) The Purchasing Division found the best option through the San Bernardino County competitive bid process to acquire the best possible fleet pricing. Staff can utilize the County's bid through a piggy back purchase agreement with Crest Chevrolet fbr the budget approved, replacement vehicles that have exceeded their service life. Respectfully submitted, w City Engineer WJO:dkh ( I'l (,t: RAN(/11('* Ct ! AFI REPI)RT DATE: Marchi 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rodney Hoops, Police (;aptain BY: Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE (1) CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN FROM GOOD CHEVROLET OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, THROUGIt THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, PROCUREMENT DIVISION, 1999 CONTRACT, 1-99-23-20, IN THE AMOUNT OF OF $20,853.94 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 141-4451-7045. RECOMMENDATION Parchasing recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of one ( l ) Chevy Astro Van from Good Chevrolet from Alameda, California through the State of California Vehicle Contract, 1-99-23-20 in the amount of $ 20,853.94 funded from account 141 -.4451-7045. BACKGROUND/ANALYSI S After the completion, approval and receipt of a block grant, the Police department identified the need for a passenger van for the (;rime Prevention department. The Chevy Astro van meets the requirements for appropriate block grant expenditure. The Purchasing department selected the State of Calilbrnia, Procurement Division, 1999 contract as the best possible fleet pricing option fbr acquiring this vehicle. The specifications outlined in the contract meet the requirements defined by the Police Department and can be acquired from Good Chevrolet of Alameda, California. Respectfu ~ubm',,~ pRo°ldicn;~ alii ai~PnS :dkh S'FAFF iREPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rodney Hoops, Police (~aptain BY: Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE (1} GMC SAFARI CARGO VAN FROM LASHER GMC/DODGE OF WOODLAND CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, PROCUREMENT DIVISION, 1999 CONTRACT, 1-99-23-20, IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,700.46 FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 141-4451-7045. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (1) GMC Safari Cargo Van from Lasher GMC/Dodge of Woodland, Calitbrnia through the State of California Vehicle Contract in the amount of $18,700.46 funded from account 141-4451-7045 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS After the completion, approval and receipt of a block grant, the Police department identified the need for a cargo van for the traffic department. The Safari cargo van meets the requirements for appropriate block grant expenditure. The Purchasing Department selected the State of California Procurement Division, 1999 contract, as the best possible fleet pricing option l~br acquiring this vehicle. The specifications outlined in the contract meet the requirements defined by the Police Department and can be acquired from Lasher GMC/Dodge of Woodland, California. Respectf !su~ed, Rodney ~,ops // Police (/ffF tain/ :dkh CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP. City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, Cily Engineer BY: Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF FOUR TRUCKS FROM HEMBORG FORD OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $153,977.57 AND ONE FROM FAIRWAY FORD SALES, INC. OF PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $46,009.25 FUNDED FROM FUND 72-4225- 7045. RECOMMENDATION Purchasing recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of five (5) vehicles, fbur (4) from Hemborg Ford of Norco, Ca lifbrnia and one (1) fi'om Fairway Ford Sales, Inc. of Placentia, in the amount of $ 153,977.57 and 46,009.25 respectfi~lly, funded fi'om account 72-4225-7045. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS All five vehicles are replacements ibr current trucks which have exceeded their service life. The unit and asset numbers are as follows: Unit 1235 (asset #515) [init 1014 (asset//624) Unit 1161 (asset #633) Unit 1237 (asset #634) t!ni! 1313 (asset # 691) City Council approved the purchase of replacement vehicles as identified in the fiscal year 1998/99 budget document under account 72-4225-7045. In January the Fleet and Purchasing Depamnents began the process of writing specifications for various fleet equipment due for replacement. In February, Purchasing mailed out 18 proposals. Bid specifications were also posted, via the City's web page. Five responses were received and after careful analysis, Hemborg Ford and Fairway Ford Sales, were selected as the lowest, responsive mad responsible bidders. Respectfully submitted, Wiiham J. O~~ City Engineer WJO:dkh CITY OF RA~ 'f,l'lO CUCAMONGA MEMORAND[IM DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT OFFER OF DEDICATION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 13062 AND FORWARD THE DOCUMENTS TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SR 30 FREEWAY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing the City Engineer, on behalf of the City, to execute documents to acc6pt Offer of Dedication of Lot "A" ofTtact No. 13062 and forward it to the State of California (Caltrans) for the purpose of constructing SR 30 Freeway. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 20, 1999, the City Council approved Resolution No. 99-007 authorizing the City Engineer, on behalf of the City, to execute documents to transfer the subject property from the City to the State of California (Caltrans) for the purpose of constructing SR 30 Freeway. During the process, Caltrans was notified by the escrow company that an additional document, per Subdivision Map Act, was needed from the City of Rancho Cucamonga accepting the Offer of Dedication of Lot "A" of Tract No. 13062, since it was rejected at the time the map was recorded. Upon the approval of the attached Resolution, the State of California (Caltrans) will complete the process of receiving the property which will be used for construction of the SR 30 Freeway. There will be no cost to the City in the transfer of these properties. Respectfully submitted, William~J. O,Neil~~~t~ City Engineer WJO:JES:dlw Attachment: Resolution q7 BANYAN STREET QUIT CLAIMED PARCEL ---~ · \ HIGHLAND AVENUE ROUTE 30 FREEWAY , 19TM STREET Z < ~ ~ < BASE LINE ROAD c.¢q?-L~":,5. CITY OF RANCI'IO CUCAMONGA A ROUTE30 ... ~ ~ .,~ FREEWAY .... ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION N ~ - VICINITY MAP page RESOLUTION NO. qq-- ~..~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROADS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration and execution, documents conveyed by Tract No. 13062 dated March 18, 1987 by Instrument No. 87-087927, Official Records of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, from Loma Vista Woods, Ltd., a California Limited Partnership also identified as Assessor Parcel No. 202-101-39; and WHEREAS, the documents known as I_.ot "A" of Tract 13062 was rejected by City Council at the time submitted; and WHEREAS, per Section 66477.2(a) of tile Subdivision Map Act, states that the legislative body may by resolution at any later date, and without further action by the subdivider, rescind its action and accept the offer of dedication and shall be recorded in the office of tile county recorder; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Ranclio Cucamonga to accept the Offer of Dedication and forward the subject documents to the State of California (Caltrans). NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Authorize the City Engineer to execute the documents which will accept the Offer of Dedication of Lot "A" of Tract 13062. 2. Direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution to the Legal Documents signed by the City Engineer which will be forwarded to the State of California (Caltrans) in recording same. qq CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGR F.~MENT FOR CUP 97-09, BEAR GULCH, LLC AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANA LYSIS The project is a combination self storage-commercial facility at the southeast comer of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. In the final stages of plan check, the engineer for the applicant discovered an error in their survey data. The original data indicated the water would flow from the intersection southwesterly on San Bernardino Road and southeasterly on Foothill Boulevard. The corrected data indicates the water flows easterly across the entire project frontage. The new intersection, being north of the old frontage road, is too high to effectively channel the water. The site was redesigned to channel the public water through the landscape setback at the corner as shown on exhibit B. The Engineering plans were revised accordingly and a drainage acceptance agreement executed. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit A) Drainage Pattern (Exhibit B) Resolution ..... ~. ~ / I,~\ ~ ~/ / ~ .~ ": ....h~ ~ i -. ~._.~ '-.~ .--- i ~'--~ ~.. .'. ,~ ...... ".-....? j / -~ ~ Z .... ~ -' : ~ ~ ........ ~ ..........~~~ ~ _. , .-~- .... . .... : ' x x~ ',' .~'.,, ~'?..',?' , " ,~, ....'~ .... ...' _._...~'~ " ,_, ~ ',: ...... ..~ ~ ~ ~ , -~ . - ,~ '~. ,"~ . . _. , ,. ~, ~ . ,~ ~, ...... , ~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ .............. CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA ~.~~ ITEM: CUP 97-09 D~INAGE AGREEMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION TITLE: VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT: "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ITEM: CUP 97-09 DRAINAGE AGREEMENT TITLE:DRAINAGE PATTERN ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR BEAR GULCH, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its consideration a Drainage Acceptance Agreement executed on October 15, 1998 by Bear Gulch, LLC as developer, for the acceptance of public drainage water discharged fromSan Bernardino Road onto their Bear Gulch Storage development; and WHEREAS, the acceptance of such public drainage water described in said Drainage Acceptance Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to a s Bear Gulch Self Storage; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval and acceptance of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard said developer has offered the Drainage Acceptance Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI-[O CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Drainage Acceptance Agreement be and the some is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto. CITY OF R. ANC}-10 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE PORTIONS OF TWO ALLEYS, GENERALLY' WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND SETTING THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR APRIL 7, 1999 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the public hearing for April 7, 1999, for the vacation of portions oftwo alleys, generally within the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue. In addition, said resolution authorizes the City Clerk to cause same resolution to be published 14 days prior to the public hearing. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Northtown Housing Development Company (NTHDC) is currently processing CUP 98-30 for construction of a Community Center. In conjunction with this processing, NTHDC has requested the vacation of certain unimproved alleys that are contiguous to the proposed Community Center. These alleys are currently not being used for access by adjacent properties since there are no visible openings from the adjoining properties. Basically, these alleys are just "paper" alleys that were created with the original North Cucamonga Subdivision in 1887 and are not needed for public use. Utility companies, other agencies and various City divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and were asked for comments. There were no objections to the vacation from any of the groups notified. However, as far as the affected property owners are concern, they will be notified by mail of this proposed vacation prior to City Council action on April 7, 1999. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT March 17, 1999 Page 2 The vacation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the circulation element of the General Plan. The alleys in this area of the City are also not included or required as "community travel routes" of the General Plan. On January 27, 1999, the Planning Commission determined the vacation conforms to the General Plan and recommended the vacation occur. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil '~ City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ¢~-~5 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTIONS OF ALLEYS GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tile City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate a portion of ALLEYS GENERALLY WITHIN THE Northtown Area located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue, as shown on Map No. V-161 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, which has been further described in the legal descriptions which are attached hereto marked Exhibits "A" and "B" and by reference are made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 7th day of April, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Ranclio Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 14 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET". SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, ifany, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 14 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of Block 5 of the Map of the Town of West Cu~a{'nonga, as recorded in Book 13 &Maps, pages I and 2, records ofthe County Recorder oflhc County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: .pARCEL A: That portion of Lot 6 &said Block 5 lying westerly of the easterly ~35.00 feet orsaid Block .5. Contains 2,400 Square Feet pARCEL B: That portion of the 20 foot wide unnamed right of way bounded on Ihe west by the southerly projection of the wcslerly line &Lot 10 and on the east by the southerly projection of the westerly line of the easterly 5 feet &Lot 7 all of said Block 5. Contains 1,900 Square Feet See attached Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part thereof. Derbish, gue~a & Associates SB I Utica Avenue, Suite 150 Rancho Cucamonsa, California 91710 (909) 9874306 , R.C.~. 29224 I E,X3-{IB IT "B" FERON { __ . .BO U LEVAR. D . t. ~ ,:: 5~ ~ , :. ,~. ,:/,-, , ~AP SHALL ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 25 50 SCALE 1'=50' I N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V-/6'/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE M,~INTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR MDR 98-32, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE EAST OF THE 1-15 FREEWAY, SUBMITTED BY USL PARALLEL PRODUCTS OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6 for MDR 98-32. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: MDR 98-32, located on the south side of Arrow Route east of the I-15 Freeway, is required to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of those conditions the Developer is required to have the project annexed into the appropriate lighting and landscape maintenance districts. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form has been received from the Developer and is on file in the City C!erk's office. Attached is the Resolution for adoption by the City Council to complete the proposed annexation. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer WJO:SM:sd Attachment N RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 98-32 (APN: 229-121-10) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets ,and Highways Code of~e State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, TItEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTii COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA MDR 98-32 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: MDR 98-32 (APN: 229-121-10) STREET LIGHTS: NUMBER OF LAMPS Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SI ............... -- S6 ............... LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf' Non-Turf. Trees Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea. L3B ............ ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S2 I_, I ! 1.28 22.56 11.28 11.28 Annexation Date: March 17, 1999 Form Date 11/16/94 CITY OF RANC}-10 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March i 7, ! 999 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 5, 1999, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts Fiscal Year 1999/00. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS It is recommended that assessment rates not be increased in any of the Landscape Maintenance Districts for the FY 1999/00. Water costs savings due to water conservation efforts that include a program to continue computerizing the irrigation systems for the entire District's maintained landscape areas is helping to keep the cost down allowing the assessment rate to be the same as the rates for FY 1998/99. In many of the districts, back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some districts an increase in the amount of landscape area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount &maintenance and operation costs. This cost will be offset by increase in revenue received from new developments in the district. In past years, any available prior year carry over was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. In some districts this is still true and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 99/00 rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. A tax delinquency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in tax payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the district can be added to the districts fund balance. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 1999 Page 2 Landscape Maintenance District No. I - General City It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $92.21 for the FY 99/00. Prior year carryover funds will be applied in the district, however they may not be available in future years. Landscape Maintenance District No, 2 -Victoria Planned Community It is recommencted that the assessment rate remain at $422.00 for the FY 99/00. LMD/t2 has the largest landscape area of any district in the City with 127.13 acres, of which 32.37 acres is parks. Prior year carry over will be applied but may not be available in the future. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A - Hyssop It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $413.74 for the FY 99/00. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B -Commercial/Indt,strial It is recommended that assessment rate remain at $352.80 per acre for the FY 99/00. Landscape Maintenance District No.4 - Terra Vista It is recommended that the single fanlily residential assessment rate remain at $252.50 for the FY 99/00. LMD #4 has 36.23 acres of parks. Prior year carry overs will be applied but may not be available in the fi~ture. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5- Tot Lot It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $113.29 for the FY 99/00. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 - Caryn It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $246.97 for the FY 99/00. Prior year carry over will be applied but may not be available in the future. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 - North Etiwanda It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $307.05 for tile FY 99/00. Etiwanda Creek Park located on the east side of East Avenue north of and adjacent to the Summit Intermediate School was accepted into the district in fiscal year 97/98 for maintenance of 12 acres. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 1999 Page 3 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 - South Eftwanda It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $151.45 for the FY 99/00. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WS:dlw Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports KESOLUTION NO. q q- D.5'] A RESOLUTION OF THF_, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999~00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work. SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3 B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1999/00 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within tile boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part ofany improvement providing for illumination ofthe subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Cierk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. i, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment Districts. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 1999 Page 2 of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all deiStils as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Enu, ineer. SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. _ has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent ofthe assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of klearinK. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearings is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 1999 AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1999/00. Landscaping and Lighting Act of' 1972. SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 1999 Page 3 Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 ofthe Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulatio..n published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. q q'° 6'~ D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to tile Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, tile City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with tile City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, sai'd Council as duly considered said report and each and every part thereofand finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, tile City Council of tile City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That tile Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses orsaid work, and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report, be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That tile diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts, are hereby approved and continned. 3~ That the proposed assessments upon tile subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for tile fiscal year 1999/00 tBr tile purposes of all subsequent proceedings. CITY CiF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor, and Members of City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 5, 1999 TO LEVY THE, ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/00 FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineer's Report and set tile Public Hearing for May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the Fiscal Year 1999/00. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance tile cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of !and east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions, giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 1999/00. The assessment rate increased from $35.00 to $52.00 during the 1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate is to remain at $5200 for the 1999/00 Fiscal Year. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the tbllowing schedule: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) March 17, 1999 Page 2 Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential $52.00 Less than 1.50 acres $26.00 1.51 acres to 3.50 $78.00 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres .. $I 82.00 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $364.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $728.00 25.01 acres and Larger $1,300.00 Respectfully submitted. City Engineer WJO:WS:dlw Attachmenls: Resolutions Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 9 ~] "~4~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD - 85), FOR THE FISCAl. YEAR 1999/00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work. SECTION i: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 1999/00 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common park purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries orsaid District. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said district. Location of Work. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Park and Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and PD-85. Description of Assessment Districts. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Improvement District (PD - 85), indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. ?¢ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) March 17, 1999 Page 2 Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description orsaid assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer. SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No.~ has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office ofthe City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that A Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 9 [ 730. WEDNESDAY, May 5, 1999 AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said Maintenance and Service for the existing Improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected tbr fiscal year 1999/00. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscaping and Lighting Act of' 1972. SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code ofthe State of California. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) March 17, 1999 Page 3 Publication of Resolution of Intention. SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 696 ! of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulatio.n. published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. " CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walter Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING TIlE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 5, 1999, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineees Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 5, 1999 to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 1999/00. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANA LYSIS Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates in all eight of the Street Light Maintenance Districts are not recommended to be increased this fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The Southem California Edison electric rate is expected to remain stable for the 1999/00 fiscal year. At the present time, each district is able to stand on its own without additional funding from other sources. In some districts there is an increase in the number of street lights being maintained. However these will not effect the assessment rate at this time. Edison charges for traffic signals are also included in the applicable districts. In addition, Operations and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, will also be borne by the applicable districts. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for the FY 99/00 and will allow the assessment rates to remain stable. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 99/00 rates which are not recommended for an increase from the FY 99/99 rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each district and any carryover used to offset maintenance costs. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, i 999 Page 2 The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: Street Lighting Maintenance District Assessment Rate per Assessment Unit SLMD #I - Arterial $'i7.77 SLMD #2 - Local $39.97 SLMD #3 - Victoria Planned Community $47.15 SLMD #4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $28.96 SLMD #5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60 SLMD #6 - Comercial/Industrial $51.40 SLMD #7 - North Etiwanda $33.32 SLMD #8 - South Etiwanda $193.75' *This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. Respectfully submitt, ed, City Engineer WJO:WS:dlw Attachments: Resolutions Engineer's Reports RESOLUTION NO. t?~ _ ~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999/00. PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work. SECTION !: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1999/00 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon'dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment Districts. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 1999 Page 2 District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more p~rticular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer. SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. _ has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearings is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 1999 AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried outor why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year i 999/00. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 SECT1ON 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 1999 Page 3 Publication of Resolution of Intention. SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 clays before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulatio~ published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION ~0. ¢¢" t[~)C'/~ ¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council as duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part orsaid report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimateof itemized costs and expenses orsaid work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and contire, ed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries ofthe subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and con firm ed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1999/00 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. c-d3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbucna, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRI(.;T NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 96-26, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ASPEN AND LAUREL STREETS, SUBMITTED BY N & L NILAR CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 96-26, accepting the subject agreement and securities, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: CUP 96-26, located at the northeast corner of Aspen and Laurel Streets, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 12, 1997. This project is tbr the construction and operation of a 5,420 square foot restaurant and bar with an 800 square foot outdoor dining patio. The Developer, N & L Nilar Corporation, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful PcrR)rmance Bond $ 12,300.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 6,150.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are awfilable in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 96-26, N 8,: L NILAR CORPORATION March 17, 1999 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City C!erk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer WJO:WV:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~)9-ff)~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 96-2(!; WHEREAS, the City Council of the (.'ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March ! 7, 1999, by N & L Nilar Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast comer of Aspen and Laurel Streets; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said hnprovement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 96-26; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said hnprovement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the lXlayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR CUP 96-26 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of ! 972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WIIEREAS, all of the owners ofproperty within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Enginecr's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings ofthe Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 - ~ FOOTHILf BOL/L£ NOT& ,' 37~6T LIGHT ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~d~K~ ~T C~TY OF ~A~CHO CUCA~O~GA COU~T~ OF SA~ ~E~A~D~O STATE OF CALIFORNIA CU~ 9~-26 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: CUP 96-26 STREET LIGHTS: NUMBER OF LAMPS Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000I. 22,000L 27,500L SI ............... " S6 I ............ LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea. L3B .......... 6 ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S2 L ! N/A 1.10 2.20 !.10 1.10 Annexation Date: March 17, ! 999 Form Date 11/16/94 7q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERlinG DIVISION EXHIBIt. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joseph Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE ON-CALL TECHNICAL SERVICES RELATING TO AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) TITLE II, IN THE AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 PER YEAR, AND APPROPRIATIONS OF $15,000 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-6028 AND $5,000 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 20-4532-6028 FORFISCAL YEAR 1998/99 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve, award and execute the subject Professional Services Agreemere with Bucknam & Associates, Inc., to provide On-Call Technical Services for Title II requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the amount of not to exceed $20,000 per year, and appropriations of $1 $,000 from Account No. 10-4637-6028 and $5,000 from Account No. 20-4532-6028 for Fiscal Year 1998/99. BACKGROUND/ANALYS IS The City has completed Phases I & II pertaining to Title II of the ADA Program and is currently upgrading the necessary facilities according to the Transition Documents which were provided to the city by Bucknam & Associates, Inc. This Professional Services Agreement will provide the City with assistance in Tifie II of the ADA, in designing the program data base, provide training on use of Microsof~ Access software, provide in-house briefing to raise awareness for City staff on the City's ADA Program, assist the City in the development of policies as they relate to the Program, inform the city of changes to the American with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), provide surveys of new facilities for ADA compliance or resurvey facilities as a result of changes in the regulations or adoption of new regulations, confer with the U.S. Access Board on technical issues, provide legislative tracking and analysis that may affect the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) along with summary memorandums and assist the City in budget preparation as related to ADA and any plan check duties which may be needed from time to time. Respectfully submitted,' Wi . eil City Engineer WJO:JS:dlw CITY ()F RANCI t() C[.K:A?vI{ )N( b\ STAFF REP()I; T DATE: March 17. 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: l,inda R. Beck, Jr. Enginccr~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVI]MI~NTS, RELEASI~ TIlE FAITIll:tIE PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCI~ BOND AND FII,E A N()TICE O1: COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 96-18, LOCATED ON TIlE SOUTII SIDE OF SIXTH STREET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements lbr DR 96-18, have been completed in fill acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Cottaoil accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to accept a Maintenance Bond and release the Faithfid Pcrlbrmancc Bond. 11ACK(; ROUNi)/ANA I,YSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of [)R 96-18, located on the south side of Sixth Street. west of Eliwanda Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. It is recommended that City Cottaoil release the existing Faithful Pcrlbrmancc Bond aml accept the Maintenance Bond. I)cvclopcr: Mccdcr Construction and Engineering Company __,_.~ Sixth Sircot Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Pcrlbrmancc Bond 3SM 909 199 00 $40.000.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond 3SM 909 199 00-A $ 4,000.0() Respect fi~lly s u bm ittcd, William J. ()'Nell Cily Engineer WJ():I,RII:[s f~[iSOLUTION NO. qg'- ~ '~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCItO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIlE PUBLIC IMPROVEMI';NTS I)R 96-18 ANI) AUTIIORIZIN(Ti TIlE FILING OF A NOTICI.; OF COMPLETION FOR '1'1 ll'".' WORK W! IERI7. AS, the construction of pt,bile improvcmc,'tts lb,' DR 96-18, have been completed to the satisthction of the City Enginccr; and W111!I~.I~AS, a Notice of Completion is required to bc tilcck ccrtilying the work complete. NOW T! IEREFORI'L be it resolved. that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sim~ and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino CotH~ty. City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department DR 96-18 SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE .... OWTAR/O NORTH ('I'I'Y ()t: RANCI t() CI iCA*,I()N(TiA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17. 1999 'FO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack lmm, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: l.inda R. Beck, ,h'. Enginccr~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMI~ROVI~MENTS, RELEASE TIlE FAITIIFUi, PERFORMANCE BOND, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION I:()R IMI'ROVEMENTS FOR DR 96-22, I,()CAT[':I) AT 12320 I:'OURTIt STRI~ET. SUBMITTED BY 1 IERITAGE BAG COM['ANY, A TEXAS CORI'ORATION 11.ECOMMENI)ATION: The required improvements tbr DR 96-22. have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithlid l~crlbrmance Bond. !IACK(iROUN!)/ANAI,YSIS: As a condition of approval ofcomplctiol~ ol'l)R 96-22. the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The street improvements have bccll completed alld it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Pcrtbrmance Bond. Developer: I IERITAGE BAG COMI'ANY, A TEXAS COI~,PORAT!()N 1648 DIPLOMAT DR. IVF, CORROI,IJI'()N. TX 75006-6847 Release: Faithful Pertbrmancc Bond $148.000.00 Respectfully submitted. Nc~l City Euginccr WJ():I,RB:Is City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department DR 96-22 12320 FOURTH STREET z ~ FOOTHILL '~ '~ ARRON ~ ROUTE g >- _ .... 6TH ~ STREET ~ ~ o Z 4TH STREET ~ ~ VICINITY MAP NO SCALE NORTH RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, FOR DR 96-22, SUBMITTED BY HERITAGE BAG COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 96-22, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /,- (,I'I'Y ()F RAN(.I-I( CtJCAM()Nf~A STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer,,jff~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITItFUL I~ERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOP, TRACT 13565, SUBMITTEl) BY RICItMOND AMERICAN HOM ES RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements tier Tract 13565, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approwd of completion of Tract 13565, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithfid Performance Bond and accept Maintenance Bond. Developer: Richmond American 11omes 17310 Redhill Avenue, Suite 320 Irvine, CA 92614 Release: Faithfid Performance Bond 441395S $ 99,882.20 Accept: Maintenance Bond 441395S $ 9,988.22 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W.IO:LP, B:Is ()F RANCH() (71 ;CAM(')NGA SITE PLAN f VIC INI'TY MAP TRACT 13565 A RI';S()I.[JTION ()F THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA. CAi.IFORNIA, ACCEIrI'IN(¢ TftF, P1.JI?,I~I(¢ I MPROVEMI:,NTS FOR TRACT 13565, AND AU'I'li()RIZING TIIF~ FILING OF A NOTICI~ OF COM [)1 ,I~,"I'ION It( )R TIt [.;, WORK WI 11~Rt:iA S. the construct ion o f public improvements tbr Tract 13565, have been completed to the satisthction ot'thc City Engineer; and WItERI~AS, a Notice ol' Completion is required to be filed, certil~ing the work complete. NOW TI t[~RI~F()I{ E, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorizcd to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CI'IW OF I ANCHO CIJCAM()N(~A STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. ()'Neil, C ily l)',ngineer BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Parks Plam~eN~ ~.. Michael D. Long. Supervising Public Works Inspector/~',~' SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-068, AS COMPLETE, R[:A.A~ASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONqRACT AMOUNT OF $46,592.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council accept the Library Expansion Prqject, Contract No. 98-068, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and retain the Faithful Perfommnce in the amount of $45,000.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $45,000.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, authorize the release of the retention in the mnount of $4,659.20, thirty-live days after the approval of the tinal contract amount of $46,592.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plaus and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $46,592.00. which includes one contract chm~ge order in the amount of $1,592.00 for furnishing and installing carpet. The original amount approved by Council was $49,500.00. Res~y submitted, /7 William J. O'Neil City Engiueer WJO:KME/MDL:Is /tO/ RES()LUT1ONNO. qq-O 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCt~O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBIiAC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TIlE IABRARY EX PAN S i ON PROJECT, CONTRACT N O. 98- 068 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE ()t: COMPLE'I~ION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements lbr the Library Expansion Project, Contract No. 98-068, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice ot~ Completion is required to be filed, certitS'ing the work complete. NOW, TI~IEREI~()I~,E~ the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. /oR CITY OF RANCH() CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 - A review of the Federally required Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, including the preliminary selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a new grant allocation of $959,000 and approximately $165,000 in reprogrammed funds. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council conduct a public hearing and take public testimony regarding the application for funding and direct staff to prepare the final Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan to be brought back at a subsequent meeting for adoption (see Exhibit "C" for the draft Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan). BACKGROUND Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to cities and counties based on a formula which considers the community's population, extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. To be eligible for funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG program: 1. The development of viable, urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment; and 2. The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate- income. CDBG regulations require that at least 70 percent of all funds must be directed to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 1999-2000 fiscal year, 90 percent will benefit low- and moderate-income persons. This year's grant allocation of $959,000 represents a $7,000 increase from last year. The year before, the grant was reduced by $32,000, or 3.25 percent, from the previous year. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRAFT CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATIONS - CITY OF R.C. March 17, 1999 Page 2 The City received 29 proposals, of which 15 are public service related activities. In evaluating these proposals, first priority was given to those projects which are consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's 5-year Consolidated Plan and those programs that were in-process and on- going activities. Attachment "A" provides a list of the proposals received and the proposed funding recommendations. Attachment "B" provides a description of each proposal. Home Improvement Program: The City's Home Improvement Program has been in existence since 1990. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $25,000 and grants of up to $5,000 for low-income, owner-occupied, single family and mobile homes. Since the program's inception, there has been an overwhelming number of requests for assistance from both the single family and mobile home community. There are currently 36 residents on the waiting list for single family rehabilitation and 28 residents on the waiting list for mobile home rehabilitation. Additionally, the Oldtimers Foundation Home Maintenance Program provides minor and emergency repair grants to seniors and low- or low-moderate income, owner-occupied households. Capital Improvement: The following Capital Improvement projects are recommended for funding in Fiscal Year 1999-2000: · Rancheria Drive - Design for this project was funded in FY 96-97. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, aggregate base, new AC paving, trees, sod, replacement walls, fences, drive approaches, and landscaping. The improvements are needed to construct curb and gutters where they are missing to improve the drainage of the street and the right-of-way. · Monte Vista Street - The design improvements for Monte Vista Street was initially funded in FY 97-98. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, ramps for the disabled, new AC paving, as well as replacing affected walls, fences, driveways, and landscaping. The revised design will update previously prepared plans to include sidewalks, thereby providing full street improvements. When completed, the project will facilitate better drainage of the street and the right-of-way. · Sidewalk Grinding - Involves the grinding and repair and/or replacement of displaced sidewalks in qualified target neighborhoods. · Wheelchair Ramps - Retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate handicapped persons. Capital Facilities: The following Capital Facility Improvement projects are recommended for funding in Fiscal Year 1999-2000: · Senior Center Expansion and Renovation - This is a multi-year project that includes funding for both design and construction activities. The following modifications are proposed to the Senior Center: 1) remodel the Mission Room to add a small stage and storage area, 2) enclose the west patio to create a climate-controlled solarium and add an emergency handicap exit ramp to Malvern Street, and 3) modify the northeast side of the building to include an entry corridor and windows to allow public access from the new parking lot and provide visual security to the building CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRAFT CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATIONS - CITY OF R.C. March 17, 1999 Page 3 · Senior Center Landscaping - This project will include the design of landscape and irrigation improvements for the Senior Center. Plans will include the addition of a new meter, as well as replacement landscape material and irrigation equipment throughout the entire site. · Metrolink Mechanical Lift for the Disabled - The design of improvements for the installation of a mechanical lift to improve access for disabled persons to the Metrolink Rail System. Historic Preservation: The preservation and historic restoration of the Isle House. Preservation and restoration activities include: property acquisition, selective demolition, moving the structure, and historic restoration. This program is a multi-year project and was submitted by the Etiwanda Historical Society. Public Service: Federal regulations allow communities to use up to 15 percent of their annual grant allocation to fund public service activities. The amount recommended for FY 1999-2000 is $96,645, or 9.76 percent of the grant. The programs that are recommended meet the priority of assisting in immediate health and safety needs or address a special need identified in the Consolidated Plan. These programs include assistance such as: food, shelter, youth-at-risk, and senior services. CORRESPONDENCE Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published one month prior to the meeting on February 15, 1999, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin as an one-eighth page display ad. Notice was also published in the La Voz newspaper as a display ad. Notices were posted in several community areas including the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Lion's Center, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:TG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - FY 1999-2000 CDBG Funding Analysis Exhibit "B" - FY 1999-2000 CDBG Application Descriptions Exhibit "C" - FY 1999-2000 Draft Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan FY 99-00 - CDBG FUNDING ANALYSIS Administration $ 140,000.00 I $ $ 0.00 $ 140,000.00 $ 140,000.00 [ YES-Continue Required Element Capital Improvement Program $ 239,300.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 239,300.00 $ 239,300.00 YES- Design Funded FY 96-97. Fund Project Construction, $ 27,500.00 $ 5,878.84 $ 0.00 $ 21,621.16 $ 27,500.00 YES - Complete Design $ 28,750.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NO- Funding Unavailable $ 385,600.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NO- Funding Unavailable $ 176,760.00 $ 0.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 30,000.00 YES- Fund Design $ 77,010.00 $ 34.421.31 $ 42,588.69 $ 0.00 $ 77,010.00 YES-FundDes~go $ 467,500.00 $ 52,350.00 $ 27,846.50 $ 0.00 $ 80,196.50 YES - Bank Available Funds $ 223,800.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NO- Funding Unavailable $ 49,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 5,000.00 YES- Fund Project Design Sidewalk Grinding $ 30,375.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Wheelchair Ramps $ 34,135.00 $ 0.00 $ 16,514.38 $ 4,485.62 $ 21,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Etiwanda Historical Society $ 156,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 200,000.00 YES-ContinueHistoric Preservation Subtotal-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $1,895,730.00 $ 192,6'~"~'"~0.15 $ 121,949.57 $ 390,406.78 $ 705,006.50 Home Improvement Program Home lmprovement Program $ 325,000.00 15 0.00 $ 0.00 15 325,000.001 $ 325,000.00~YES-ContinueE,igibleProgram Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance $ 10,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 51.45 $ 9,948.55 $ 10,000.00 YES-Continue Eligible Program Subtotal-HOMElMPROVEMEN, ' ,ooo.ooI,o.oo, ,ooo.ooI Public Services Programs ~ IMB - Fair Housing $ 15,188.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,739.56 $ 10,260.44 $ 12,000.00 YES- Coetinue Required Program Exhibit "A" - Page 1 of 2 IMB - Landlord/Tenant $ 12,654.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,964.90 $ 8,035.10 $ 10,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Homeless Outreach, Programs and Education $ 12,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 6,400.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Foothill Family Shelter $ 3,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program House of Ruth $ 20,399.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Pomona Valley Council of Churches -SOVA $ 8,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program YWCA Y-Teen $ 8,500.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 YES - Continue Eligible Program YMCA West End Kids Club $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Northtown/Your Own Club $ 6,000.00 $ 0.00 $ $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Community Services Dept. - Senior Programs $ 5,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 150.87 $ 4,849.13 $ 5,000.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition $ 25,555.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 YES- Continue Eligible Program $ 20,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NO- Duplicates Existing Program $ 10,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NO- Other Funding Available $ 10,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 NO- Other Funding Available SubtotaI-PUBLICSERVICE $ 182,355.00-[$ 0.00 I$ 3,855.3~$ 93,644.67 $ 97,500.00 available = $1,275,578.50 FY 99/00 Entitlement Grant $959,000 Public Service Cap = 15% $93,644.67 / 959,000 = 9.76% ($143,850 Maximum) Administration Cap = 20% $140,000 / 959,000 = 14.59% ($191,800 Maximum) Funds available for reprogramming include the following: FY 95/96, Acct. 9316 (9th Street) $28,437.27, FY 97/98 Acct. 9500 (Tapia Via Drive) $2,884.97, Acct. 9713 (RCSC Parking Des/Const.) $7,387.71, Acct. 8189 (Oldtimers Home Maintenance) $51.45, Acct. 8187 (Fair Housing) $1,739.56, Acct. 9114 (Landlord/Tenant) $1,964.90, Acct. 9619 (Senior Citizen Services) $150.87, and Acct. 9716 (RSET) $153.20, FY 98-99 Acct. 9833 (Tapia Via - Sidewalks) $88,119.31. These total $130,889.24, subtracting out the balance discrepancy of $5,032.89 results in a balance of $125,856.35. · Multi year project funding for ADA Improvements has occurred through the Lion's East, Lion's West, RCSC Interior, Sidewalk Grinding, and Wheelchair Ramp projects. · ..j Exhibit "A" - Page 2 of 2 FY 1999-2000 CDBG APPLICATION DESCRIPTIONS · - Prior Year Activity [] - New Activity CDBG ADMINISTRATION · CDBG Administration: Program oversight and administration including coordination, implementation, and monitoring of all CDBG funded programs. Also includes related planning activities including housing studies, historic preservation, and community planning. Funding for all, or a portion of, eight staff positions. Requested funding: $140,000. CAPITAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS [] Rancheria Drive from Grove Avenue to Tapia Via (Construction): Design for this project was funded in FY 96-97. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, aggregate base, new AC paving, trees, sod, replacement walls, fences, drive approaches and landscaping. The improvements are needed to construct curb and gutters where they are missing to improve the drainage of the street and right-of-way. Requested funding: $239,300. · Monte Vista Street from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Design): The design of improvements for Monte Vista Street was initially funded in FY 97-98. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, ramps for the disabled, new AC paving, as well as replacing affected walls, fences, driveways and landscaping. The revised design will update previously prepared plans to include sidewalks, thereby providing full street improvements. When completed project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. Requested funding: $27,500. [] Calle Vejar from Avenida Lion to Hellman Avenue and Avenida Leon from Arrow Highway to Calle Veiar (Design): Includes research, surveying and preparation of plans. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, ramps for the disabled, repaving, as well as replacing affected walls, fences, driveways and landscaping. When completed project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. Sidewalk installation will be coordinated with residents to facilitate preservation of existing trees. Requested funding: $28,750. [] Calle Vejar from Avenida Lion to Hellman Avenue and Avenida Leon from Arrow Highway to Calle Vejar (Construction): Includes the removal of existing pavement, curb, and trees and the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ddve approaches, ramps for the disabled, aggregate base, AC pavement, street trees, sod, replacement walls, fences and driveways. When completed project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. Requested funding: $385,600. · Sidewalk Grinding: Involves the grinding, repair and/or replacement of displaced sidewalks in qualified target neighborhoods. Requested funding: $30,375. · Wheelchair Ramps: Retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Requested funding: $34,135. Exhibit "B" - Page 1 of 4 CAPITAL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS [] RCSC Landscaping (Design): This project will include the design of landscape and irrigation improvements for the Senior Center. Plans will include the addition of a new meter, as well as replacement landscape material and irrigation equipment throughout the entire site. Requested funding: $30,000. · RCSC Expansion and Renovation (Design): Prior year funds include $40,310 from FY 97-98 to fund the design of the multi-year improvement project. Design modifications to the Senior Center include the following: 1) Remodeling the Mission Room to add a small stage and storage area, 2) Enclosure of the West Patio to create a climate controlled solarium and the addition of an emergency handicap exit ramp to Malvem Street, and 3) Modifications including an entry corridor and windows to the northeast side of the building to allow public access from the new parking lot and providing visual security to the building. Requested funding: $77,010. · RCSC Expansion and Renovation (Construction): Prior year funds include $44,800 from FY 98- 99 to fund the design of the multi-year improvement project. Proposed funds would be banked for future project improvements that will provide a better functioning facility. The following modifications are proposed to the Senior Center: 1 ) Remodeling the Mission Room to add a small stage and storage area, 2) Enclosure of the West Patio to create a climate controlled solarium and the addition of an emergency handicap exit ramp to Malvern Street, and 3) Modifications including an entry corridor and windows to the northeast side of the building to allow public access from the new parking lot and providing visual security to the building. Requested funding: $463,690. [] Park Improvements for ADA Compliance: Project would be carried out in various parks within the City and would include renovation of tot lot facilities and installation of resilient surfacing to allow for use by the physically challenged. Requested funding: $223,800. [] Metrolink Mechanical Lift for Disabled: Project would include the installation of a mechanical lift to improve disabled persons access to the Metrolink Rail System. Project includes the removal of existing improvements and the construction of a mechanical lift, replacement fencing, and landscaping. Requested funding: $49,000. · Etiwanda Historical Society: The preservation and historic restoration of the Isle House. Preservation and restoration include: property acquisition, select demolition, moving structure, and historical restoration. Moving and securing the house included if not paid by Caltrans. This program is provided by the Etiwanda Historical Society, at P.O. Box 363, Etiwanda, CA 91739. Requested funding: $156,000. HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM · Home Improvement Program: Provides housing rehabilitation for owner occupied single family and mobile home units. The program offers deferred payment loans up to $25,000 and grants or emergency grants up to $5,000. It is anticipated that 40 households will be assisted. Service is provided by the City's Planning Division and Building and Safety Division. Requested funding: $325,000. Exhibit "B" - Page 2 of 4 · Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance Program: Provision of minor and emergency repair grants to seniors and low- or low-moderate income owner occupied households. It is anticipated that 80 households will be assisted during the year. The Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Requested funding: $10,000. PUBLIC SERVICES · Graffiti Removal: The removal of incidents of graffiti from public properties in identified target neighborhoods. Requested funding: $20,059. · Fair Housing: Provision of Fair Housing services including education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. It is estimated that 564 residents will be assisted. This service is provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. Requested funding: $12,654. · Landlord/Tenant Services: Provision of Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services. It is estimated that 271 households will be assisted. This services is provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Requested funding: $15,188. · Homeless Outreach, Programs, and Educations: Provision of services to individuals and families who are or are at-risk of homelessness. Services include advocacy, education, and shelter vouchers. It is estimated that 340 residents will receive assistance. This service is provided by HOPE, located at 213 North Fern Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. Requested funding: $12,000. · Foothill Family Shelter: Operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. It is estimated that 4 families will be assisted. This service is provided by Foothill Family Shelter, located at 167 North Third Avenue, Upland, CA 91786. Requested funding: $3,000. · House of Ruth: Advocates for and assists ~ow- and low-moderate income battered women by providing shelter, programs, education and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living. It is estimated that 1,758 residents will receive assistance. This service is provided by House of Ruth, P.O. Box 459, Claremont, CA 91711. Requested funding: $20,399. · West End Hunger Proqram-SOVA: Provision of a 5-day supply of food (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and supportive services. It is estimated that 1,185 residents will receive assistance. This service is provided by the Pomona Valley Council of Churches-West End Hunger Program located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Requested funding: $8,000. · YWCA - Y-Teen: Provide personal development and societal betterment after-school activities to low- and low-moderate income youth at-risk in a nurturing environment as alternatives and diversions from health threatening and risk-taking behaviors. This program is run at the Cucamonga Middle School campus located at 7611 Hellman Avenue. It is estimated that 60 youth will be assisted. This service is provided by the YVVCA of the West End, located at 600 North Park Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768. Requested funding: $8,500. Exhibit "B"- Page 3 of 4 lid · YMCA - West End Kids Club: Offered to students from low income families attending Bear Gulch School. This activity provides an after-school recreational program. It is estimated that 90 children will be assisted through the program. This service is provided by the West End YMCA, located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Requested funding: $6,000. · YMCA - Your Own Club: This program is targeted to the Northtown neighborhood, CT 21, BG 6 & 7. The program is run at the Old Town Park and the Villa Del Norte community room. The program is designed to provide at-risk middle school aged youth with fun, educational, enriching, and challenging values based after-school alternatives in a safe and enjoyable environment. It is estimated that 50 children will be assisted through the program. This service is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Requested funding: $6,000. · Senior Citizen Services: Project will create affordable low-cost senior citizen programs focusing on physical fitness, wellness, recreational and educational development, and mental health and emotional well being. This project also includes a lease agreement with the Assistance League of Upland to provide additional parking areas for the Senior Center. This service is provided through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Requested funding: $5,000. · Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition Program: The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center. There will be 22,500 hot meals provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. It is estimated that 570 resident households would receive assistance. This service is provided by Oldtimers Foundation, located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontaria, CA 92335. Requested funding: $25,555. [] Water of Life Community Church: The Neighborhood Life Program targets elementary school children in after-school programs offering homework help programs, arts and crafts, and various events. It is estimated that 1,000 children would receive assistance. This service is provided by the Water of Life Community Church, P.O. Box 1417, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Requested funding: $20,000. [] West End Literacy League: The West End Literacy League trains volunteer tutors to work with adults who need to improve their basis reading and writing skills. It is estimated that 70 persons would receive assistance. This service is provided by Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Requested funding: $10,000. [] Back to Basics: The Back to Basics program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12 year old children identified by the school personnel as at-risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. It is estimated that 190 persons would receive assistance. This service is provided by Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Requested funding: $10,000. Exhibit "B" - Page 4 of 4 ill CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN F~SCAL YEAR 1999-2000 DRAFT March 17, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (FORM SF424) .......................... Page 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................... Page 2 RESOURCES AVAILABLE ............................................. ~;:,,~ Page 2 · Federal Resources ................................ . .. Page 2 · Other Resources ...... Page 3 · Leveraging and Matching Funds ............. . ......... Page 3 ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ................... Pa~ · Affordable Housing ................... 4 · Homeless ........................... e 10 · Homeless Annual Plan ................ e 12 · Special Needs Page 12 · Special Needs Annual Plan ............. Page 13 · Non-Housing Community Development ........... Page 13 OTHER ACTIONS ................. Page 21 · Affirmatively Furthering Fair Hous .... . ........... Page 21 · Obstacles to Meeting Under-Ser ............. Page 23 · Actions to Foster and Maintail ............... Page 23 · Actions to Remove Page 23 · Actions to Reduce Lead-I azard ..................... Page 24 · Actions to Reduce ........................... Page 24 · Actions to Uonal Enhance Coordination ... Page 24 · Pub Housing ......................... Page 25 · ·" Page 25 CITIZEN ::~ ...................................... Page 26 APPENDIX "A" . ....................... Appendix "A" - Page A1 FY JLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN APPE "B" EXECl ........................... Appendix"B"- Page B1 s OF 4TS TO FAIR HOUSING Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (FORM SF424) The Application for Federal Assistance will be inserted into final report. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 INTRODUCTION The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be undertaken during the 1999-2000 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priority needs identified by the City to implement the primary objective of the ~evelopment Block Grant (CDBG) program which is the development of viable urban commun, providing decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic o principally for low- and moderate-income persons RESOURCES AVAILABLE · Federal Resources Community Development Block Grant CDBG funds are the primary Federal funds the program year. The City's grant allocation available for Fiscal Year __ e $959,000, which is $7,000 more than Fiscal Year 1998-99. CDB( years total $192,650, and CDBG funds reprogrammed rs total~56. The sum of CDBG funds available for activity funding during 506. The City does not expect to receive any program income d year. San Bernardino County Housing AL The San Bernardino local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently opera nits of which 185 and 16 public housing units are within th4 lable to City residents through the Housing Auth( ~rily ;ction Grant Improvement, and the Public County i Economic and Community Development The mplement the HOME Consortium, which the City joined in July 1 programs through the HOME Consortium which include the ~ce Program (HAP), HOME Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, and the HOME C opment Organization (CHDO) Program. The County allocation for these 0, including program administration. These programs are all available to first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME .~rship Assistance, Tenant Based Assistance, and Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation programs are discussed under specific activities in the Consolidated Plan, however, the CHDO Set-Aside program is not identified and therefore warrants further discussion. The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside from the County HOME Consortium I I~ Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga 115 Page 3 and provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored or owned by non-profits which have been certified as a community housing development organization. The CHDO program functions as a source of funding for a variety of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential structures. Funds are not targeted to a specific area or type of project within the County, however, recipient income cannot exceed 80 percent of the County medium family income. HOME funds are available to eligible residents citywide on a first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME )roximately $1,031,500 allocated to this program. · Other Resources City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency State law requires Redevelopment Agencies to set a~ 20 percent revenue for increasing and improving the low- and moderate-income housing. Between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 2000, a .~3 million will be generated by tax increment for affordable housing. The tax increr ~e to the 20 Percent Set- Aside during the reporting period is projected to be ~1,782. should be noted, that the Agency's tax increment has already been ainst projects, and therefore, there is actually very little ~ilable. In July 1996, the Agency approved in bonds to provide permanent financing for two commL izations, Southern California Housing Development Cor Housing Development Corporation (NHDC), located within the City On September 1, 1996, Tax Allocation Bonds in the sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following 1. the ) was signed with SCHDC in which $3.9 million ,~bt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housil extended beyond its current sunset, this $790,000 of the into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not the available for any Agency housing program. 2. The Agency a pledge agreement through the year 2025 with NHDC in which $1.5 million to NHDC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. Additionally, in net bond proceeds were paid to NHDC. These bond proceeds will be complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown which includes continuing the development of infill housing on vacant lots, and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge will be $1.4 million through the year 2025. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 · Leveraging and Matching Funds The primary source of fund leveraging will occur in conjunction with activities carried out through the Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds. This is accomplished through public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as the NHDC and the SCHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME Funds and Low Income Housi Credits. ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN · Affordable Housing OBJECTIVE 1 CONSERVATION OF THE MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi, its to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity 1.1.1: This activity will include not only units but also those which have not previously been Lead Agency: The SCHDC, with of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: Activities in .pment target area, however, units may be acquired citywide. resources on page 3). Accom There are a total of 4 complexes, 1,096 total units with 504 held as Redevelopment funds, far exceeding annual and 5- year goal Sycamore Springs Apartments (96 of 240 units), Mountainside s), Monterey Village Apartments (112 of 224 units), and Rancho V, of 248 units). No additional units are anticipated during the progral 1.2: and substantial rehabilitation of existing single-family les. 1.2.1: ram is part of the NHDC's First-Time Homebuyer Program. The First- ]ram provides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single family homes for home buyers. The NHDC anticipates acquiring up to 3 homes for luring the program year. This program functions as part of a larger First-Time Homebuyer program and is reported under Objective 4. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga //7 Page 5 Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Savings of America. (See discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, up to 3 home abilitated and leased for two years to a household with an income between 4,¢ and 60 he area median family income. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3). Activity 1.2.2: The construction of new single family ;s for ate home buyers. Lead Agency: Habitat for Humanity and the City of Rar Redevel~ Agency. Geographic Location: The Northtown target Resources: Utilizing sweat equity, an $85,000 ill be low interest private financing and volunteer labor and materials to owm a household with an income at 35 percent of the area medium lion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and Time Frame: the construction of 1 single family home. OBJECTIVE 2 IMPROVl )ABLE HOUSING FOR ALL ~EHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON ON 3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Program single family infill development in low/moderate Activity 2. First Time Homebuyer program which provides newly- construl for low- and moderate-income home buyers. The NHDC has 0 lots for of new homes on infill lots within the Northtown target nei( rhood. Agency: the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. This activity functions through the neighborhood non-profit NHDC, and is target neighborhood. Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Washington Mutual. (See discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). I I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Pla/~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, complete the construction of 10 new homes. (See Objective 4, Program 4.3) OBJECTIVE 3 PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO EXTREMELY LOW AND LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING ¢il!ii'l'~' Program 3.1' Support applications by the Hous' lan Bernardino County for future Section 8 and Activity 3.1.1: The Housing Authority routinely ~istance for Federal funds for Section 8 Housing Certificates The City will continue to support these applications. ction 8 units of which 185 are located within the City. The ag~ 16 pub iing units and rents them to qualified households at affordable rat Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Geographic Location: These programs are Resources: Federal Housing and Urban Accomplishments and Time Fram~ st 166 Section 8 applicants and 16 public housing applications, an Program 3.2: Conside~ direct tenant assistance through n in Bernardino's HOME Consortium. ~istanc ram is offered through the County HOME Consorti~ sidents. The County has designed the program to provide assistance n preferences, but especially to those who met a "special need." rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families ~c housing situations where the temporaw housing or shelter is either suitable or nc as permanent housing. ency: County ~an Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development, Consodium. Available to eligible residents citywide. IOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's on in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $600,000 allocated to this program. This includes $400,000 in monthly rental assistance and $200,000 in security deposit assistance. I I I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga //¢ Page 7 Accomplishments and Time Frame: Approximately 6 households should receive assistance by June 30, 2000. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 4 INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICL HOME BUYER ASSISTANCE. Program 4.1: Administer First-Time Home Bu~ ~nsored. Activity 4.1.1' The Redevelopment Agency is adminis' a using down payment Assistance Loans. The loan is a maximum of $16,000.00. The loan is forgiven if the bu, n the unit Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelop~ Geographic Location: This program would be ;nts citywide. Resources: Redevelopment Agency Accomplishments and Time Frame: of 20 first-time home r buyers. Activity 4.1.2: The Redevelopmet 10-city home ownership consortium called the California Cities Home ( CCHOA provides equity for down payment and settlement costs a be used to establish or reestablish the lease- ;r's credit re home buyers who do not currently meet the ancing and do not typically qualify for existing home is. Th ,~-purchaser may have household incomes up to 140% ~um home price is $240,000. CCHOA by approved lease-purchasers. Lease payments accrue in behalf of the lease-purchaser. The mortgage is later assume( ~nce program components are met. The program is Freddie Mac a and includes education and credit counseling. lency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. )hic Locati This program would be available to eligible residents citywide. program will use $70 million to fund first mortgages on a first come, first s ie 10-cities program issued 2 tax exempt bonds ($70 million for mortgage financing lion for a reserve fund). Sun West Mortgage Company, Inc. is the lender for the program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, assist a maximum of 30 time home Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 buyers. Program 4.2: Administer a First-Time Home Buyer program through the HOME Consortium. Activity 4.2.1: The County of San Bernardino operates the Homeownership Assi Program (HAP) in which households earing less than 80 percent of the median e may receive assistance in the purchase of a first home. The HAP provides. a silent program for low-income buyers. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, De ,nomic a HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents Resources: HOME funds are available on a basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with 000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: ~ld receive assistance by June 30, 2000. The City will work with the publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga Program 4.3: NHDC First dyer PI Activity 4.3.1: The NHDC's Fir ram provides newly-constructed and/or ingle-family low- home buyers. NHDC plans to complete as the rehabilitation of up to 3 home. The newly s¢ ~ncome-eligible home buyers earning up to 90 percent ~me. The rehabilitated homes are leased for a two-year period at ling between 45 percent and 60 percent of the area median family two year lease period, the tenant will be offered a purchase o the ability to properly maintain and pay for the home and can ~ first mortgage. lency: The Iraphic Locatior~!.i!iii~he Northtown target neighborhood. received a pledge amount from the Redevelopment Agency that they are gly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program. (See discussion of ~,gency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, the sale or lease of 13 newly constructed and rehabilitated homes. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 OBJECTIVE 5 REHABILITATION OF THE CITY'S EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Program 5.1: Moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely low, low- and moderate-income homeowners. Activity 5.1.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Program available to eligible owner-occupied households; those earnin( ~nt of the area median family income. The program offers deferred 5,000 and grants of up to $5,000, including emergency repair grants. and not only lends the money, but secures administration of the grants and loans rather than farmir While this method requires additional staff time, it is )mer service and ensure consistent and efficient results. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Geographic Location: The program is available 31e Resources: CDBG funds: $325,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: 40 households with incomes below 80 percent of the a edia inco Program 5.2: Consider ltal rehabilitation program. is ;sidents or local projects through the County available for low interest loans to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing re~ rental units. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation of up to $25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subj~ be available to low- and very-low income residents. Lead, County, Department of Economic and Community Development, HOI ,rtium raphic Locatl~!],' Available to eligible residents citywide. funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's County HOME, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 1999-2000 program year. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this I II I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 program in Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 6 IMPROVEMENT OF THE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR EXTREMELY LOW- AND LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Program 6.1' Continue to support applications of the Hou~ for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to enable ent in living conditions for public housing res' Activity 6.1.1: Each year the City has certified Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Comprehensive Plan. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Aul Geographic Location: This program will benefit re.~ Resources: Federal Comprehensive Grant Accomplishments and Time Frame: housing units. · H o m e I e s s : OBJECTIVE 1 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH lOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS. Program 1 ' of local homeless facilities and services. Activity ~tlassistance to a variety of organizations that provide irareed short term shelter. The City will continue to address priority will contint ~luate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These include: ;ss and Education (HOPE) ~nce to individuals and families who are or are at-risk of homelessness services as advocacy, education, shelter vouchers, and referrals. HOPE is ,rth Fern Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Foothill Family Shelter Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. They are located at 167 Nodh Third Avenue and at 230 and 238 North San Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786 House of Ruth House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education and self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for n hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offi~ is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all met )ld. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by ~sistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hu~ ~m fror at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucam( Geographic Location: The ben( this ram occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: · 3,000, Through June 30, 2000, the following numbers of homeless or n, ;less indivi, tmilies will receive assistance: HOPE ~0 .... persons. FoothillFamily Shelter - 4 families. of Ruth - 1,758 persons. - 1,185 persons. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 · Homeless Annual Plan As discussed in the Consolidated Plan, the City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in th~ ~lan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that are able to provide defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and or at-risk of homelesshess. Included in these activities are vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral services. The City will~ es as an means of assisting those who are at-risk of homele in ke assistance will be encouraged for those agencies that assist in the transition to permanent housing · Special Needs OBJECTIVE 1 PROVIDE NECESSARY REI ;ES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS~ ~ THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL Program 1.1: Provide minor services to eligible households to low- and moderate- income sel Activity 1.1 .!: the! that provides minor rehabilitation and emer assista~ and )come residents and senior citizens. The a Avenui CA 92335. Residents who are owner its, up to $100 per visit, and in emergency situations, the allowance up to $250. In addition to household repairs, the Oldtimers Fou ramps for disabled residents. Lead City Jcamonga Planning Division. G~ Location: of this program are available to residents citywide. $10,000 (includes $51.45 in CDBG funds reprogrammed from FY 97- :nts and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2000, Oldtimers Foundation will assist at least 80 low- and low-moderate income households. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 OBJECTIVE 2 PROVIDE SUPPORT WHEN POSSIBLE TO SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS. Program 2.1: Provide support to special need services in areas where there is significant under-served needs. Activity 2.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational developmet d emotional well- being. To meet additional parking needs for the i-year lease utilize the parking lot of an adjacent facility. In return for provide monthly rent, maintenance, and improvements' :ing lot is critical to the participation of senior citizen reside i. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga ~rtment Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Resources: CDBG funds: $5,000 (includes rammed from FY 97- 98). Accomplishments and Time assisted 550 persons throu9h these activities. · Special Needs Ob identi the City intends to take over the next program year to /ho are not homeless, but have special needs. · N( Needs IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC IN ORDER TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS AND ~ii~ I!THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW/MODERATE INCOME GHBORHOODS AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, · ;NIORS, AND HANDICAPPED. Complete all necessary infrastructure improvements and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity 1.1.1' The City will continue to utilize its resources to fund public capital improvement projects: II Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Rancheria Drive from Grove Avenue to Tapia Via (Construction) The design for this project was funded in FY 96-97. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, aggregate base, new AC paving, trees, sod, replacement walls, fences, drive approaches and landscaping. The improvements are needed to construct curb and gutters where they are missing !e improve the drainage of the street and right-of-way. ;;~;. ~ Monte Vista Street from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald The City conducted a special survey to qualify this area )rovements street improvements being initially funded in FY 97-9 ~ installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, AC paving, as well as replacing affected walls, fences, dscaping. asign will update previously prepared plans to include thereby full street improvements. When completed project and right-of-way. Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement in Identified Tar Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of are inaccessible. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamon Geographic Location: Rancher Southwest Cucamonga target neighborhood CT 21, BG 2. Avenue and Archibald Avenue, is located in a larger area which a, CT 20.05, BG 1, however, based on staff survey of the area thi~ was let area and received confirmation from HUD on 1995. be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods in( 2, Resources: ;: Monte $27,500 (includes $5,878.84 carried forward from FY 97-98). Sidewalk '$25,000. )lishments ar Frame: By June 30, 2000, complete the installation of Rancheria )lete the design of Monte Vista Street, and replace approximately 3,900 Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Expansion and Renovation. Activity 1.2.1: This will fund the design of this project to provide a better functioning facility. The following design modifications to the Senior Center are proposed: 1 ) Remodeling the Mission Room I I II I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 to add a small stage and storage area, 2) Enclosure of the west patio to create a climate controlled solarium and the addition of an emergency handicap exit ramp to Malvern Street, and 3) Modifications including an entry corridor and windows to the northeast side of the building to allow public access from the new parking lot and to provide visual security to the building. The Senior Center expansion project includes two activities, design and The design of the center was initially funded in FY 97-98 and for this program yea funds to complete the project design. The construction activity in FY 98-99 and identified as a multi-year project where funds will be ~ble to allow completion of the project. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Ce~ Highway. Resources: CDBG funds: · RCSC Expansion/Renovatiol includes $34,421.31 carried over from FY 98-99 from FY 97-98 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks · RCSC Expansion/Re ,196.50 (this includes $52,350.00 carried over from rammed from FY 97-98 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks rammed from FY 97-98 RCSC Parking Lot ion Accom the design for the proposed improvements by June 30 Program 1.3: C~ ,ga Senior Center Landscaping. This p~ the design of landscape and irrigation improvements for the Center. PI; nclude the addition of a new meter, as well as replacement lar material and iion equipment throughout the entire site. lency: City O¢iRancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. ion: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Highway. Resources: CDBG funds: $30,000.00 (this includes $28,437.27 reprogrammed from FY 95-96 9th Street Design and $1,562.73 reprogrammed from FY 97-98 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program). II Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Accomplishments and Time Frame: Complete the design for the proposed improvements by June 30, 2000. Program 1.4: Metrolink Mechanical Lift for the Disabled. Activity 1.4.1' The design of improvements for the installation of a ~echani to improve disabled persons access to the Metrolink Rail System. Project of existing improvements and the construction of a mechanical lift, re landscaping. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineerin! Geographic Location: Metrolink Station, Rancho Resources: CDBG funds: $5,000 (reprogrammed frol Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program). Accomplishments and Time Frame: Compk improvements by June 30, 2000 OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUE TO iERVlCE AGENCIES THAT FUNCTION OF LIFE FOR LOWER INCOME PERSONS :IAL NEEDS. Program 2.1: groups in the highest priority fair housing, landlord/tenant ~tion, and battered women's shelter as well as and recreation opportunities for the disabled. Activity 2.1.' utilize its resources to fund public service agencies, including: Fair Mediation Board for Fair Housing services which include and legal referral. This service is provided by Inland Fair located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. ~tion acts with Inland Mediation Board for Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services. This services is provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 House of Ruth House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. louse of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hun¢ SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providir services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Pr Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. YWCA - Y-Teen Provide personal development and societal betterm~ to low- and low- moderate income youth at-risk in a nurturing envir as and diversions from health threatening and risk-taking behaviors. Th s run at Middle School campus located at 7611 Hellman Avenue. ded West End, located at 600 North Park Avenue, Pomo YMCA - West End Kids Club Offered to students from low incor B Gulch School. This activity provides an after-school recreational led by the West End YMCA, located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho YMCA The and the Villa Del Norte community room and targeted to the Nc 6 & 7. The program is designed to provide at-risk middle school enriching and challenging values-based after school environment. This service is provided by the Rancho Family of the West End YMCA, located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106 Cucamon 730. Foundation .i~i':i~enior Nutrition Program ion progr~ili~/i'i~ run from the Senior Center ,n which 22,500 hot meals would be provided .... ~'--'"~'~' '~ '~~'~"ter and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. This service is provided ';:~dation, located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Benefits from these programs will be provided to residents citywide. I III Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Resources: CDBG funds: · Fair Housing: $12,000 (includes $1,739.56 reprogrammed from FY 97-98). · Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $10,000 (includes $1,964.90 reprogrammed from FY 97-98). · House of Ruth: $7,600. · SOVA: $7,000. · YWCA: $7,000. · YMCA - West End Kids club: $6,000. ~::'i ' · YMCA- Northtown/Your Own Club: $5,0 :'~ · Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition: i,500. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, /iduals and households will receive assistance: · Fair Housing - 564 persons. · Landlord/Tenant - 271 househok · House of Ruth - 1,758 perso~ · SOVA- 1,185. · YWCA - 60 youth. · YMCA - West End Ki, · YMCA- Northtown. ~. · Oldtimers Found~ 0 seniors. OBJECTI' TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND Program 3.1 ramps at all curb returns. Activity retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individL Le~Agency: City of n Cucamonga Engineering Division. ~hic Locati Citywide improvements to all curb returns. $21,000 (includes $16,514.38 reprogrammed from FY 97-98 Tapia Via E program). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing for handicap ramps. II Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 OBJECTIVE4 PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE ClTY'S CDBG PROGRAM AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Program 4.1: Continue to fund necessary planning and administrative activities each year. Activity 4.1.1: Includes research and analysis with regard Iram applications, performance reports, target area studies, historic and housi.~g documents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Geographic Location: Benefits of the program are elk Resources: CDBG funds: $140,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Com program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective OBJECTIVE 5 TO REVlTAL lING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND AN BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND to residential energy efficiency, lead-based and Code Enforcement through the City's Program. Activity a Home Improvement Program in which, through the activity, improvements mentioned previously would be completed. A activity will ;d. Agency: City o[,!,l~ncho Cucamonga Planning Division. Benefits of the Home Improvement Program are available to eligible Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: There will be no accomplishments listed separately as I I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga 162 Page 20 improvements will occur for residents eligible for the Home Improvement Program. Program $.2: Continue to fund a Graffiti Removal Program, Activity 5.2.1: City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remo~ incidents of graffiti. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target n( ,orhood,. and 7 and CT 20.01, BG 4. Resources: CDBG funds: $20,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, of approximately 14,999 square feet of graffiti. Program 5,3: Historic Preservatio~ Activity 5.3.1: The restoration and hi; pre~ House. Preservation and restoration activities will include: lemolition, moving and securing the house, and historical restorati~ prograf This activity will be conducted by the Etiwanda Historical Society. Lead Ag~ City of Division. Geogral~ previously located at the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and ht-of-way for the future Foothill Freeway. The structure was moved to west side of Etiwanda Avenue, within the vacated AT & SF Railr int location for the structure has been located, directly north of and to the Re ~'Urces: CDBG (includes $100,000 in CDBG funds carried forward from FY Frame: By June, 30, 2000, fund Historic Preservation activities that uisition, moving the structure to a permanent location, and the design of )lans for the structures restoration. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Page 21 OBJECTIVES THE ALLEVIATION OF PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVlTALIZATION. Program 6.1: Review and Evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Activity 6.1.1: Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area e~ has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with and planni~g land use to ensure effective and balanced growth ak a task force to review the planning and land use issue,. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Geographic Location: Approximately 6 miles from Avenue. Resources: City General Fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: an analysis of Foothill Boulevard with recommendations rega OTHER ACTIONS · Affirmatively Furtl" Hm Since J Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide of State and Federal housing laws for all residents who request assi., minister the Fair Housing Program assures that there are no imped The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counselin( to promote fair housing. In the City's Impediments Analysis was completed and submitted to HUD (a f of the Impel Analysis is attached as Appendix "B"). That document established )11owing strategiE s areas where the contracted Fair Housing provider should intensify Im efforts. property owners and managers on their responsibilities under fair housing cluding educational course, newsletters, and workshops. 2. Target the renting population through an on-going fair housing educational program including public workshops, high school student/parent groups, and adult education. i i Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 The IFHMB provides quarterly Fair Housing newsletters which are circulated to apartment owners and renters throughout San Bernardino County, and specifically within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. They also conduct Fair Housing workshops to educate the public on their responsibilities under Fair Housing laws. 3. Monitor lending practices of major lenders under the Home within the City. Track the same lenders Community Reinvestment improve the City's housing. The IFHMB monitors the lending activities of various ba~ institu tracking lending practices to different ethnic groups activity is submitted in compliance with the City's Fair '~g for an analysis of each banking institutions activity. 4. Accomplish media outreach by feature local newspapers, radio announcements used for public spots, regL in Spanish, and providing information to the provided in certain communities. The media outreach program for the information is accomplished through airtime on the following radi IF, KVCR, KNSE, KMIA, KWRN, KVVRM, KXSB, KXRS. 5. Network with both Ft to the corn 6. te~ Outreach brol issues and upcoming workshops are provided to City. 7. ~ints of discrimination. Assist complainants in filing charges with ~ enforcement age ~ir Housing pr assists low- and low-moderate income persons during the program year require counseling. These complaints include issues of race, color, status, religion, sex, marital status, and disability. 8. Promote April as fair housing month with government municipalities, housing industry, and the general public. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action P/an City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 The City works with the IFHMB to promote April as "Fair Housing Month." 9. Monitor newspapers for classified advertising which is written in such a way as to discriminate against certain groups in housing. 10. Make recommendations to local governments and review components of an ,~i~ oca Y..I housing related plan. 11. Provide assistance and network with the County of San Bernal Authority for the Section 8 certificate and voucher program. The IFHMB conducts these activities on an ongoing Fair Housing education is provided as a major ram with a g the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all ~using industry. r Housing outreach is provided through radio programming, mass and the IFHMB web site. Fair housing enforcement is provided through the through the IFHMB or related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housin( sting to gather evidence of discrimination. In summary, the Fair Housi attem )lish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing ing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal within the community. · Obstacles to Meeting The primary obstacle identifie( needs is a lack of available resources, however, is Je. The best way to address this matter is to comb and and r sources. The City is striving to do all three by ~s as ~ seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME ~e available funding. · nd Housing The m~ of the O1: Actions identified as part of this plan are specifically aimed at and existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new co Action, conservati at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to ise the affordabh stock. Barriers to Affordable Housing gnificant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or amended. All the regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 · Actions to Reduce Lead-Based Paint Hazard In conjunction with the CDBG program, the City will continue to implement Federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-ba= Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the a for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abate, It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts 'ied out also follow the same guidelines as those used for the · Actions to Reduce Poverty The City has relatively little control over the many the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that ma~ toward this end is the support of public service agencies that incor lg and I into their programs, which includes most of the a 3 funding. Most of the activities funded by the City, particularly th )ramunity development, act indirectly to increase economic develc in f, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with Section 3 re employment of local low income individuals. From a 'ng the Pri and programs aimed at increasing ~/ill housing available to those in the lowest income~ · and Enhance Coordination The in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strer ~n the syste .,termined that one main action that can be taken toward this end is inc expertise nd City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program ' and contact and coordination among City departments will also bute to the effectiveness. to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency iroviders operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end :ling resources and the type of service provided. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 · Public Housing Improvements Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the CHAS and now the Consolidated Plan. · Monitoring ~ Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that in a consistent with the National Objectives of the CDBG 'n and tl" achieving stated goals. The following outlines in the implementation of the CDBG program. Standards Utilized for Review o Is the program meeting intended objectives? o Is the agency capable of tracking ng information and is it capable of carrying out the res with Federal requirements? o Is appropriate and accurate manner? Monitoring Procedures All :d to c'~" _. ,~~:¢; Federal labor and procure me nt procedures as well a= and equal opportunity requirements required by various Federal and CDBG staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance iil thE; various procedures and steps required as part of irdinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each ate preparati preparation, pre-construction meetings, and on-going proj~ ;ctions. '-'~"--'~ ' "-~'--~~~:i'~'~~'cies must sign a contract with the City in which various scope of work, time li ation requirements are outlined. On a monthly basis, each Subrecipient must *~:su ~i~L';:; .,_b~ information regarding the number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefitting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter. The City conducts an on- site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. I I IIII I I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucarnonga Page 26 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation of a truly representative and useful Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the I its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps toward ensuring adequate were taken: · A public notice of available funds and soliciting published on October 19, 1998, in the Inland Valle notice w~,l.~ also mailed to approximately 34 individuals and posted at City Hall, City Library, Senior Center · A notice of public hearing regarding the [ Jblished on February 15, 1999, in the Inland Valle 18, 1999, in the L.__~a ¥oz newspapers. Copies of the notice were po~ Library, Senior Center, and Lion's Center. The public hearing was Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix '~A" - Page A 1 ,APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY 1999-2000 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN · PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addre of Federal grant/entitlement funds, such as Community Development Block funds, for the purpose of meeting the goals of providing decent housin environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for person= ~come. · PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects cor the Consoli( an 5-year strategy and lists the projects, programs, and resource: utilized during the program year. During Fiscal Year 1999-2000, the City receive $959,000 in new CDBG funds, carryover $185,100.15 from previous Iram Iram $160,552.38 from previous program years which will be use( the fol and community development activities: CDBG Admin ~monga Pla $0.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 $0.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 Rancheria Engineering Division $0.00 $239,300.00 $239,300.00 Engineering Division $5,878.84 $21,621.16 $27,500.00 ~) Cucamonga Engineering Division $30,000.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 - Exp./Ren. Cucamonga Engineering Division $77,010.00 $0.00 $77,010.00 Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $80,196.50 $0.00 $80,196.50 Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 Sidewalk Grinding Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Wheelchair Ramps Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $16,514.38 $4,485.62 $21,000.00 III I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix '~A"- Page A2 Isle House Histodc Pres. Eftwanda Historical Society $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $314,599.72 $705,006.50 Home Improvement Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Home Maintenance Oldtimers Foundation $51 $334,948. Graffiti Removal Rancho Cucamonga Engineering $20,000.00 Fair Housing Inland Mediation Board $1,739. $12,000.00 Landlord/Tenant Inland Mediation Board $8,035.10 $10,000.00 Outreach Center HOPE $6,400.00 $6,400.00 Emergency Shelter Foothill Fami $0.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Emergency Shelter of $0.00 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 Food $0.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $0.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Youth Activity $0.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Youth Club $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 rams Community Services $150.87 $4,849.13 $5,000.00 ;tribution dtimers Foundation $0.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $3,855.33 $93,644.67 $97,500.00 $318,506.50 $959,000.00 $1,277,506.50 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix "B"- Page B 1 APPENDIX "S" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING A literature search was conducted in several areas; housing discrimination, City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element, the Grantee Performance Report 1994-1995 ~nd State fair housing laws, area demographics, national, State and local housing poli( 1990 census data, historical racial housing problems in renting and real seE, zoning and discrimination correlation. Surveys were used to accumulate the data base. information on housing discrimination, fair housing other information which could help housing policy problem ~ 1. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data wa eight lenders. 2. Eight lenders showed activity within the City.. 3. Individual interviews were complete nagement, owners, and Realtors. 4. Additional information and by CDBG City staff, County of San Bernardino Housing ~rnia rtment of Fair Employment, and the Department of Housing ~air Housing Division. The data major findings: Discriminatior, o of unders' housing laws/differential treatment. o ,~:~Unequal I treatment. o Buyer refusal. Lenders tracking. Tracking lel housing loans. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix "B"- Page B2 Housing Issues o Affordable housing (both rental and for purchase). o Neighborhood safety. o Housing and rental deterioration in neighborhoods. o Transportation. o Good schools. FAIR HOUSING ACTION PLAN The following plan of action outlines strategies reflectin, have been identified in Rancho Cucamonga's Fair Housing provider needs to intensify efforts in the 1. To educate rental property owners and )nsibilities under the fair housing laws: o Educational courses. o Newsletters. o Workshops. 2. Target the renting populal housing educational program: o Public works O 3. Monit ;rs under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act within the Cit Community Reinvestment commitment to improve the Ci~ 4. ~?Accomplish ch by: o and paid ads in local newspapers. o Radi, inouncements used for public spots. periodic radio prograrns in Spanish. information to the Community Billboard, in addition to live interviews in certain communities. 5. Network with both Federal and State Fair Housing Departments and other related services to assist the complainant. I Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appen~x"B"-Page B3 6. Network with the Association of Realtors and the Apartment Rental Owners Association as technical advisor. 7. Mediate/reconcile complaints of discrimination. 8. Assist complainants in filing charges with enforcement agencie,~ 9. Promote April as fair housing month with g :sing industry, and the general public 10. Monitor newspapers for classified advertisin¢ to discriminate against certain groups in housing. 11. Make recommendations to local governments an( of any local housing related plan. 12. Provide assistance and network with g Authority for the Section 8 certificate and vo~ CITY PROGRAM The City retains the res providing a yearly monitor and evaluating the performance of tt Maintenar preset of the City's substandard housing. o itation money to rental and home owners. o Hou,, needing property revitalization. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO DAYTIME CURFEW REGULATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendment to keep our ordinance consistent current case law. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In June 1996, the City Council approved an ordinance prohibiting minors from loitering at~er curfew (10:00 p.m.) and from loitering during the daytime when school is in session. This ordinance was adopted to provide the police and the schools with another tool in fighting juvenile crime and tmancy. Recently, the City of Monrovia's ordinance was challenged by home schooling advocates because their ordinance, like ours, did not have exceptions for home schooling and other circumstances as set forth in the Education Code. Other than not providing tbr these exceptions, the concept behind the ordinance is still valid. The proposed amendment you are considering alters the language of the ordinance to expand the permissible grounds for non-attendance at school based upon the provisions of Education Code Sections 48205, 48222 and 48224. This amendment maintains the original intent of the ordinance as adopted by the City Council in June 1996 while updating it to be consistent with the most current case law on the subject. For this reason, staff is recommending approval of the amendment. R~e~l~ectfully Submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager /dab ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND REVISING DAYTIME CURFEW REGULATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PJtNCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 9.30.020 of Chapter 9.30 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of new subsections "E" and "F" to read as follows: "E. When the minor is receiving home or private school instruction pursuant to Education Code Section 48222, or is receiving instruction by a qualified tutor pursuant to Education Code Section 48224, or is otherwise exempt by law from attendance at a public or private full-time day school; or "F. When the minor is authorized to be absent from his or her school pursuant to the provisions of Education Code Section 48205, or any other applicable State or federal law." Section 2. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of co~)etent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1999. Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk 990224 11231-00001 nlc 1754531 /~/~ I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the day of , 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1999. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk 990224 11231-00001nlc 1754531 - 2 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve an ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopting a Telecommunications Regulatory Ordinance and amending Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND American Cable Entertainment (A.C.E.), Comcast Cablevision and City staff have been working with the City's Cable Attorney, to update the City's existing cable television ordinance to address the many legal changes in the telecommunications industry and other telecommunication services as the regulatory framework relating to cable television has significantly changed in the last 14 years. The new amended ordinance has been reviewed and found acceptable to both A.C.E. and Comcast. Below is a brief summary outlining the diftbrences between the original Title 7 and the new amended Title 7. Also included for your information is a list of Southern California cities that have adopted or are in the process of adopting a similar telecommunications regulatory ordinances. The original Title 7 (Cable Television Systems and Franchises, Ordinance No. 220), adopted on March 21, 1984, was adopted prior to the federal enactment of the Cable Telecommunications Policy Act of 1984, the Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. As might be expected, the regulatory framework related to cable television systems and franchises has experienced many changes over the years, and is now generally subject to some level of review or regulation by local government. The amended Title 7 (Telecommunications Regulatory Ordinance), outlines the regulatory authority that the City of Rancho Cucamonga now has under state and fbderal law with respect to various categories of telecommunications service providers, including cable television operators that must obtain a franchise from the City. ANALYSIS Briefly surmnadzed, the amended ordinance contains six (6) chapters, which relate to the following: 1. Chapter 7.01 sets forth the purpose and intent of the ordinance. 2. Chapter 7.02 relates to franchises for cable television systems. Specifically, Section 7.02.040 identifies in general terms the various subject: matters that may be addressed in a cable television franchise agreement. This approach is more preferable to incorporating extremely lengthy and detailed provisions into an ordinance, which may prove to he obsolete or irrelevant when the cable television franchise agreement is ultimately negotiated and executed. One clarification should be pointed out with respect to Section 7.02.040(B) which states, "If there is any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of the franchise agreement authorized by the City Council and the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of the franchise agreement will control." In the past, the cable television ordinance has superseded the franchise agreement. It should be noted that this provision relates solely to Chapter 7.02, which is entitled "Cable Television Systems." Given the fact that Section 7.02.040 of Chapter 7.02 describes in general terms, rather than specific terms, the subject matters that may be addressed in a cable television franchise agreement, it is unlikely that any significant conflicts or inconsistencies will arise between the provisions of the ordinance and the provisions of the franchise agreement. 3. Chapter 7.03 sets forth a regulatory scheme that relates to "open video systems" (OVS). Virtually all of these provisions are contained in federal laws and regulations that were adopted in connection with the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Currently, there is only one potential "open video system operator" that has been certified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to provide service in Southern California. The provisions in Chapter 7.03 should be helpful to City staff in informing representatives of OVS services as to the regulatory requirements with which it must comply. 4. Chapter 7.04 addresses telecommunications services and systems other than cable television systems and open video systems (OVS). Certain categories of video providers are required to register with the City and to provide specified information concerning customer service standards set by government code. Finally, Chapter 7.04 describes certain limited regulatory authority that the City may choose to exercise over the increasing number of telephone corporations that are being certified by the Califomia Public Utilities Commission to provide local and long-distance telephone service. 5. Chapter 7.05 sets forth definitions for various terms and phrases that are used in the regulatory ordinance. 6. Chapter 7.06 sets forth sanctions for violation of the title and a severability clause. CONCLUSION Lastly, there are a number of cities in Southem Califomia that have recently adopted a "Telecommunications Regulatory Ordinance" similar to the one being considered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Below is a list of some of those cities: · Costa Mesa · West Hollywood · Rancho Palos Verdes · La Puente · Hidden Hills · Agoura Hills · Diamond Bar Similar ordinances are also under consideration at the present time in the cities of Pasadena and Hesperia, and in the cities of Bell and Cudahy that previously formed the Bell-Cudahy Cable Television Joint Powers Authority. spectfully s~ erry Fulwood Deputy City Manager JFB:da (Title7 staffrpt3.17) i ORDINANCE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING A TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ORDINANCE AND AMENDING TITLE 7 OF THE RA/~CHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIl., OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is repealed in its entire~y. Section 2. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is amended by adding a new Title 7 to read as follows: "TITLE 7. TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ORDINANCE CHAPTER 7.O1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.01.010 Title This title is known and may be cited as the "Telecommunications Regulatory Ordinance" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7.01.020 Purpose and Intent A. The City Council finds and determines as follows: 1. The development of cable television and other telecommunications systems may provide significant benefits for, and have substantial impacts upon, the residents of the City. 2. Because of the complex and rapidly changing technology associated with telecommunications services and systems, the public convenience, safety, and general welfare can best be served by establishing regulatory powers to be exercised by the City. 3. This title is intended to establish regulatory provisions that authorize the City to regulate telecommunications services and systems to the extent authorized by federal and state law, including but not limited to the federal Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, the federal Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, applicable regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, and applicable California statutes and regulations. ORDINANCE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING A TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ORDINANCE AND AMENDIN(~ TITLE 7 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Title 7 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is repealed in its entirety. Section 2. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is amended by adding a new Title 7 to read as follows: "TITLE 7. TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ORDINANCE CHAPTER 7.O1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.01. 010 Title This title is known and may be cited as the "Telecommunications Regulatory Ordinance" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7.01.020 Purpose and Inte~t A. The Cl]ity Council finds and determines as follows: 1. The development of cable television and other telecommunications systems may provide significant benefits for, and have substantial impacts upon, the residents of the City. 2. Because of the complex and rapidly changing technology associated with telecommunications services and systems, the public convenience, safety, and general welfare can best be served by establishing regulatory powers to be exercised by the City. 3. This title is intended to establish regulatory provisions that authorize the City to regulate telecommunications services and systems to the extent authorized by federal and state law~ including but not limited to the federal Cable Communications Pollicy Act of 1984, the federal Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992, the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, applicable regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, and applicable California statutes and regulations. B. The purpose and intent of this title is to provide for the attainment of the foiLlowing objectives: 1. To enable the City to discharge its public trust in a manner consistent with rapidly evolving federal and state regulatory policies, industry competition, and technological development. 2. To authorize and to manage reasonable access to the City's public rights-of-way and public property for telecommunications purposes on a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis. 3. To obtain fair and reasonable compensation for the City and its residents for authorizing the private use of the public. rights-of-way and public property. 4. To promote competition in telecommunications services, minimize unnecessary local regulation of telecommunications service providers, and encourage the delivery of advanced and competitive telecommunications services on the broadest possible basis to local government and to the businesses, institutions, and residents of the City. 5. To establish clear local guidelines, standards, and time frames for the exercise of local authority with respect to the regulation of telecommunications service providers. 6. To encourage the profitable deployment of advanced telecommunications infrastructures that satisfy local needs, deliver enhanced government services, and provide informed consumer choices in an evolving telecommunications market. 7.01.030 Defined Terms and Phrases Various terms and phrases used in this title are defined below in Chapter 7 CHAPTER 7.02. CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS 7.02.010 Authority and Findings A. In accordance with applicable federal and state law, the City is authorized to grant one or more nonexclusive franchises to construct., reconstruct, operate, and maintain cable television systems wi~hin the City limits. B. The City Council finds that the development of cable television and related telecommunications services may provide significant benefits for, and substantial impacts upon, the residents of the City. Because of the complex and rapidly changing technology associated with cable television, the City Council further finds that the public convenience, safety, and 990125 11231-0000! syc 0593848 2 2 general welfare can best be served by establishing regulatory powers to be exercised by the City. This chapter is intended to specify the means for providing to the public the best possible cable television and related telecommunications services, and every franchise issued in accordance with this chapter is intended to achieve this primary objective. It is the further intent of this chapter to adopt regulatory provisions that will enable the City to regulate cable television and related telecommunications services to the maximum extent authorized by federal and state law. 7.02.020 Franchise Terms and Conditions A. Franchise Purposes A franchise granted by the City under the provisions of this chapter may authorize the Grantee to do the following: 1. To engage in the business of providing cable service and such other telecommunications services as may be authorized by law and which Grantee elects to provide to its subscribers within the designated franchise service area. 2. To erect, install, construct, repair, rebuild, reconstruct, replace, maintain, and retain, cable lines, related electronic equipment, supporting structures, appurtenances, and other property in connection with the operation of the cable system in~ on~ over, under, upon, along and across streets or other public p].aces within the designated franchise service area. 3. To maintain and operate the franchise properties for the origination, reception, transmission, amplification, and distribution of television and radio signals, and for the delivery of cable services and such other services as may be authorized by law.. B. Franchise Required It is unlawful for any person to construct, install, or operate a cable television system within any street or public way in the City without first obtaining a franchise under the provisions of this chapter~ C. Term of the Franchise 1. .A franchise granted under this chapter will be for the term specified in the franchise agreement, commencing upon the effective date of the ordinance or resolution adopted by the City Council that authorizes the franchise. 2. A franchise granted under this chapter may be renewed upon application by the Grantee in accordance with 990125 11231 0000i syc 0593848 the then-applicable provisions of state and federal law and of this chapter. D. Franchise Territory A franchise is effective within the territorial limits of the City, and within any area added to the City during the term of the franchise, unless otherwise specified in the ordinance or resolution granting the franchise or in the franchise agreement. E. Federal or State Jurisdiction This chapter will be construed in a manner consistent with all applicable federal and state laws, and it applies to all franchises granted or renewed after the effective date of this chapter, to the extent authorized by applicable law. F. Franchise Non-Transferable i. Grantee may not sell, transfer, lease, assign, sublet, or dispose of, in whole or in part, either by forced or involuntary sale, or by ordinary sale, contract, consolidation, or otherwise, the franchise or any of the rights or privileges therein granted, without the prior consent of the City Council and then only upon such. terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the City Council, which consent may not be unreasonably denied or delayed. Any attempt to sell, transfer, lease, assign, or otherwise dispose of the franchise without the consent of the City Council is null and void. The granting of a security interest in any assets of the Grantee, or any mortgage or other hypothecation, will not be deemed a transfer for the purposes of this subsection. 2. The requirements of subsection 1 apply to any change in control of Grantee. The word "control" as used herein is not limited to the ownership of major stockholder or partnership interests, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. If Grantee is a corporation, prior authorization of the City Council is required where ownership or control of more than 25 percent of the voting stock of Grantee, or of Grantee's parent company, is acquired by a person or a group of persons acting in concert, none of whom, singularly or collectively, owns or controls the w~}ting stock of the Grantee, or of Grantee's parent company, as of the effective date of the franchise. 3. Grantee mus~ notify the City in writing of any foreclosure or judicial sale of all or a substantial part of the Grantee's franchise property, or upon the termination of any lease or other interest. covering all or a substantial part of that franchise property. That notification will be considered by the City as notice that a change in control of ownership of the franchise has taken place, and the provisions of this paragraph 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 4 that require the prior consent of the City Council to that change in control of ownership will apply. 4. For the purpose of determining whether it will consent to an acquisition, transfer, or change in control, the City may inquire as to the qualifications of the prospective transferee or controlling party, and Grantee must assist the City in that inquiry. In seeking the City's consent to any change of ownership or control, Grantee or the proposed transferee, or both, must complete Federal Communications Commission Form 394 or its equivalent. This application must be submitted to the City not less than 11120 days prior to the proposed date of transfer. The transferee must establish that it possesses the legal, financial, and technical capability to operate and maintain the cable system and to comply with all franchise requirements during the remaining term of the franchise. If the legal, ~inancial, and technical qualifications of the applicant are satisfactory, the City will consent to the transfer of the franchise. The consent of the City to that transfer will not be unreasonably denied or delayed. 5. Any financial institution holding a pledge of the Grantee's assets to secure the advance of money for the construction or operation of the franchise property has the right to notify the City that it, or a designee satisfactory to the City, will take control of and operate the cable television system upon Grantee's default in its financial obligations. Further, that financial institution must also submit a plan for such operation within 90 days after assuming control. The plan must insure continued service and compliance with all franchise requirements during the period that the financial institution will exercise control over the system. The financial institution may not exercise control over the system for a period exceeding 18 months unless authorized by the City, in its sole discretion, and during that period of time i~t will have the right to petition the City to transfer the franchise to another Grantee. 6. Grantee must reimburse the City for the City's reasonable review and processing expenses incurred in connection with any transfer or change in control of the franchise. These expenses include, without limitation, costs of administrative review, financial, legal, and technical evaluation of the proposed transferee, consultants (including technical and legal experts and all costs incurred by these experts), notice and publication costs, and document preparation expenses. No reimbursement may be offset against any franchise fee payable to the City during the term of the franchise. G. Geoqraphical Coveraqe 1. Grantee must design, construct, and maintain the cable television system so as to have the capability to pass every dwelling unit in the franchise service area, 990125 11231~00081 syc 0593848 2 subject to any service-area line extension requirements or territorial restrictions set forth in the franchise agreement. 2. After service has been established within all or any part of the franchise service area by activating trunk or distribution cabllkes, Grantee must provide service to any requesting subscriber within that activated part of the service area within 30 days from the date of request, provided that the Grantee is able to secure on reasonable terms and conditions all rights-of-way necessary to extend service to that subscriber within that 30-day period. H. Nonexclusive Franchise Every franchise granted is nonexclusive. The City specifically reserves the right to grant, at any time, such additional franchises for a cable television system, or any component thereof, as it deems appropriate, subject to applicable state and federal law. If an additional franchise is proposed to be granted to a subsequent Grantee, a noticed public hearing must first be held in accordance with the provisions of Government Code § 53066.3. I. Multiple Franchises 1. The City may grant any number of franchises, subject to applicable state and federal law. The City may limit the number of franchises granted, based upon, but not necessarily limited to, the requirements of applicable law and specific local considerations, such as: a. The capacity of the public rights-of-way to accommodate multiple cables in addition to the cables, conduits, and pipes of the existing utility systems, such as electrical power, telephone, gas, and sewerage. b. The benefits that may accrue to subscribers as a result of cable system competition, such as lower rates and improved service. c. The disadvantages that may result from cable system competition, such as the requirement for multiple pedestals on residents' property, and the disruption arising from numerous excavations within the public rights-of- way. 2. The City may require that any new Grantee be responsible for its own underground trenching and the associated costs if, in the City's opinion, the rights-of-way in any particular area cannot reasonably accommodate additional cables. - 6 990125 11231~00001 syc 0593848 2 7.02.030 Franchise Applications and Renewal A. Filing of Applications Any person desiring an initial franchise for a cable television system must file an application with the City. A reasonable nonrefundable application fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council must accompany the application. That application fee will cover all costs associated with reviewing and processing the application, including without limitation costs of administrative review, financial, legal, and technical evaluation of the applicant, consultants (including technical and legal experts and all costs incurred by those experts), not~_ce and publication requirements, and document preparation expenses. If those costs exceed the application fee, the applicant must pay the difference to the City within 30 days following receipt of an itemized statement of those costs. B. Applications - Contents An application for an initial franchise for a cable television system must contain,. as applicable: 1. A statement as to the proposed franchise service area. 2. A resume of the applicant's prior history, including the experience and expertise of the applicant in the cable television and telecommunications industry. 3. A list of the partners, general and limited, of the applicant, if a partnership, or the percentage of stock owned or controlled by each stockholder, if a closely-held corporation. If the applicant Ls a publicly-owned corporation, each owner of 10 percent or more of the issued and outstanding capital stock must be identifi~ed. 4. A list of officers, directors, and managing employees of the applicant, together with a description of the background of each such person. 5. The names and addresses of any parent or subsidiary of the applicant, or any other business entity owning or controlling applicant in whole or in part, or that is owned or controlled in whole or in part by the applicant. 6. A current f linancial statement of the applicant verified by a certified public accountant or otherwise certified to be true, complete, and correct to the reasonable satisfaction of the City~. 7. The proposed construction and service schedule, the proposed rate structure for cable services, and the 990125 11231 00001 syc 0593848 2 - 7 - proposed commitment to provide public, educational, and governmental access capacity, services, facilities, and equipment. 8. Any additional information that the City deems to be reasonably necessary. C. Consideration of Initial Applications 1. Upon receipt of an application for an initial franchise, the City Manager or the City Manager's designee must prepare a report and make recommendations to the City Council concerning that application. 2. A public hearing will be noticed prior to any initial franchise grant, at a time and date approved by the City Council. Within 30 days after the close of the hearing, the City Council will make a decision based upon the evidence received at the hearing as to whether the franchise should be granted, and, if granted, subject to what conditions. The City Council may grant one or more franchises, or may decline to grant any franchise. D. Franchise Renewall_ Franchise renewals will be processed in accordance with then-applicable law and with the renewal terms, if any, of the franchise agreement. The Cn~ty and Grantee, by mutual consent, may enter into renewal negotiations at any time during the term of the franchise. 7.02.040 Contents of Cable Television Franchise Aqreements A. The terms and provisions of a franchise agreement for the operation of a cable television or related telecommunications services may relat~e to or include, without limitation, the following subject matters: 1. The nature, scope, geographical area, and duration of the franchise. 2. The applicable franchise fee to be paid to the City, including the percentage amount, the method of computation, and the time for paymen%. 3. Requirements relating to compliance with and implementation of state and federal laws and regulations pertaining to the operation of the cable television system. 4. Requirements relating to the construction, upgrade, or rebuild of the cable television system, as well as the provision oi! special services, such as outlets for 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 public buildings, emergency alert capability, and parental control devices. 5. Requirements relating to the maintenance of a performance bond, a security fund, a letter of credit, or similar assurances to secure the performance of the Grantee's obligations under the franchise agreement. 6. Requirements relating to comprehensive liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance, and indemnification. 7. Requirements relating to consumer protection and customer service standards, including the resolution of subscriber complaints and disputes and the protection of subscribers' privacy rights. 8. Requirements relating to the Grantee's support of local cable usage, including the provision of public, educational, and governmental access channels, the coverage of public meetings and special events, and financial support for governmental access channels. 9. Requirements relating to construction, operation, and maintenance of the cable television system within the public rights-of-way, including compliance with all applicable building codes and permit requirements of the City, the abandonment, removal, or relocation of facilities, and compliance with FCC technical standards. 10. Requirements relating to recordkeeping, accounting procedures, reporting, periodic audits, and performance reviews, and the inspection of Grantee's books and records. 11. Acts or omissions constituting material breaches of or defaults under the franchise agreement, and the applicable penalties or remedies for such breaches or defaults, including fines, penalties, liquidated damages, suspension, revocation, and termination. 12. Requirements relating to the sale, assignment, or other transfer or change in control of the franchise. 13. The Grantee's obligation to maintain continuity of service and to authorize, under certain specified circumstances, the City's operation and management of the cable system. 14. Such additional requirements, conditions, policies, and procedures as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties to the franchise agreement and that will, in the judgment of City staff and the City Council, best serve the 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 9 -- public interest and protect the publmc health, welfare, and safety. B. If there is any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of a franchise agreement authorized by the City Council and provisions of this chapter, the provisions of the franchise agreement will control~ CHAPTER 7.03. OPEN VIDEO SYSTEMS 7.03.010 Applicabi!%t~ The provisions of this chapter are applicable to an open video system operatoz', as defined below in Chapter 7.05, that intends to deliver video programming to consumers in the City over an open video system. 7.03.020 Application Required A. Before commencing the delivery of video programming services to consumers in the City over an open video system, the open video system operator must file an application with the City. That application must include or be accompanied by the following, as applicables: 1. The identity of the applicant, including all affiliates of the applicant. 2. Copies of FCC Form 1275, all "Notices of Intent" filed under 47 CFR § 76~.1503(b) (1), and the Order of the FCC, all of which relate to certification of the applicant to operate an open video system in accordance with Section 653(a) (1) of the Communications Act and the FCC's rules. 3. The area or areas of the City that the applicant desires to serve. 4. A description of the open video system services that will be offered by the applicant over its existing or proposed facilities. 5. A description of the transmission medium that will be used by the applicant to deliver the open video system services. 6. Information in sufficient detail to establish the applicant's technical qualifications, experience, and expertise regarding the ownership and operation of the open video system described in the application. 7. Financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that demonstrate the applicant's financial ability to: 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 ~0 - a. Construct, operate, maintain and remove any new physical plant that is proposed to be constructed in the City. b. Comply with the City's public, educational, and governmental access requirements as specified below in Section 7.03.040 B(4) . c. Comply with the City's requirement that gross revenue fees be paid in the sum of five percent (5%), as specified below in Section 7.03.040 B(2) . 8. An accurate map showing the location of any existing telecommunications facil[ities in the City that the applicant intends to use, to purchase, or to lease. 9. If the applicant's operation of the open video system will require the construction of new physical plant and facilities in the City, the following additional information must be provided: a. A preliminary construction schedule and completion dates. b. Preliminary engineering plans, specifications, and a network map of any new facilities to be constructed in the City, in sufficient detail to identify: (i) The location and route requested for the applicant's proposed facilities. (ii) The locations, if any, for interconnection with the facilities of other telecommunications service providers. (iii) The specific structures, improvements, facilities, and obstructions, if any, that the applicant proposes to remove or relocate on a temporary or permanent basis. c. The applicant's statement that, in constructing any new physical plant, the applicant will comply with all applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City, including the payment of all required permit and processing fees. 10. The informa~ion and documentation that is required to be submitted to the City by a video provider, as specified below in paragraph B of Section 7.04.020. 11. Such additional information as may be requested by the City Manager. 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 -- ].l -- ~ 12. A nonrefundable filing fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council. B. If any item of information specified above in paragraph A is determined under paramount federal or state law to be unlawful, the City Manager is authorized to waive the requirement that such information be included in the application. 7.03.030 Review of the Application Within 30 days after receipt of an application filed under Section 7.03.020 that is deemed to be complete, the City Manager will give written notice to the applicant of the City's intent to negotiate an agreement setting forth the terms and conditions under which the operasion of the proposed open video system will be authorized by the City. The commencement of those negotiations will be on a date that is mutually acceptable to the City and to the applicant. '7.03.040 Agreement Required A. No video programming services may be provided in the City by an open video system operator unless the operator and the City have executed a written agreement setting forth the terms and conditions under which the operation of the proposed open video system will be authorized by the City. B. The agreement between the City and the open video system operator may contain terms and conditions that relate to the following subject matters, to the extent that such terms, conditions, and subject ~natters are not preempted by federal statute or regulations: 1. The nature, scope, and duration of the agreement, including provisions for iLts renewal or extension. 2. The obligation of the open video system operator to pay to the City, at specified times, fees on the gross revenues received by the opera'~or, as authorized by 47 CFR ~ 76.1511, in accordance with the foillowing standards and procedures: a. The amount of the fees on the gross revenues will be five percent (5%), and will be paid in lieu of the franchise fees permitted under Section 622 of the Communications Act. b. The term "gross revenues" means (i) all gross revenues received by an open video system operator or its affiliates, including all rewenues received from subscribers and all carriage revenues received from unaffiliated video programming providers; and (ii) all advertising revenues received by the operator or its affiliates in connection with the provision of video programming, where such revenues are included - 12 - 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 in the calculation of the cable franchise fee paid to the City by the franchised cable operator. The term "gross revenues" does not include revenues, such as subscriber or advertising revenues, collected by unaffiliated video programming providers. 3. The obligation of the open video system operator to comply with requirements relating to information collection and recordkeeping, accounting procedures, reporting, periodic audits, and inspection of records in order to ensure the accuracy of the fees on !zhe gross revenues that are required to be paid as specified above in paragraph B(2) . 4. The obligation of the open video system operator to meet the City's requirements with respect to public, educational, and governmental access channel capacity, services, facilities, and equipment, as provided for in 47 CFR § 76.1505. In this regard, the following standards and procedures are applicable: a. The open video system operator is subject to the same public, educational, and governmental access requirements that apply within the cable television franchise service area with which its system overlaps. b. The open video system operator must ensure that all subscribers receive all public, educational, and governmental access channels wil~hin t]he franchise service area in which the City's subscribers are located. c. The open video system operator may negotiate with the City to establish the operator's obligations with respect to public, educational, and governmental access channel capacity, services, facilities, and equipment. These negotiations may include the City's franchised cable operator if the City, the open video system operator, and the franchised cable operator so desire. d. If the open video system operator and the City are unable to reach an agreement regarding the operator's obligations with respect to public, educational, and governmental access channel capacity~ services, facilities, and equipment within the City's jurisdiction, then the following obligations will be imposed: (i) The open video system operator must satisfy the same public, educational, and governmental access obligations as the City's franchised cable operator by providing the same amount of channel capacity for public, educational, and governmental access and by matching the City's franchised cable operator's annual financial contributions in support of public, educational, and governmental access services, facilities, and equipment that are actually used by the City. For in-kind contributions, such as cameras or production studios, the open video system operator may satisfy its statutory 990125 11231~00001 syc 0593B48 2 ]-~ -- obligation by negotiating mutually agreeable terms with the City's franchised cable operator, so that public, educational, and governmental access services to the City are improved or increased. If such terms cannot be agreed upon, the open video system operator must pay to the City the monetary equivalent of the franchised cable operator's depreciated in-kind contribution, or, in the case of facilities, the annual amortization value. Any matching contributions provided by the open video system operator must be used to fund activities arising under Section 611 of the Communications Act. /ii) The City will impose upon the open video system operator the same rules and procedures that it imposes upon the franchised cable operator with regard to the open video system operator's use of channel capacity designated for public, educational, and governmental access use when that capacity is not being used for such purposes. e. The City's franchised cable operator is required under federal law to permit the open video system operator to connect with its public, educational, and governmental access channel feeds. The open video system operator and the franchised cable operator may decide how to accomplish this connection, taking into consideration the physical and technical characteristics of the cable and the open video systems involved. If the franchised cable operator and the open video system operator cannot agree on how to accomplish the connection, the City has the right to decide. The City may require that the connection occur on City-owned property or on public rights-of-way. f. All costs of connection to the franchised cable operator's public, educational, and governmental access channel feed must be borne by the open video system operator. These costs will be counted towards the open video system operator's matching financial contributions set forth above in subparagraph (d) (i) .. g. The Ci!zy will not impose upon the open video system operator any public, educational, or governmental access obligations that are greater than those imposed upon the franchised cable operator. h. If there is no existing franchised cable operator, the prow[sions of 47 CFR § 76.1505(d) (6) will be applicable in determining the obligations of the open video system operator. i. The open video system operator must adjust its system to comply with new public, educational, and access obligations imposed on the City's franchised cable operator following a renewal of the cable television franchise; provided, however, that the open video system operator will not be required to displace other programmers using its open video 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 -- ]~4 -- system to accommodate public, educational, and governmental access channels. The open video system operator must comply with such new public, educational, and governmental access obligations whenever additional capacity is or becomes available, whether it is due to increased channel capacity or to decreased demand for channel capacity. 5. Iil the City and the open video system operator cannot agree as to the application of the FCC's rules regarding the open video system operator's obligations to provide public, educational, and governmental access under the provisions of subsection 4 set forth above, then either party may file a complaint with the FCC in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures set forth in 47 CFR § 76.1514. No agreement will be executed by the City until the dispute has been finally resolved. 6. If the open video system operator intends to maintain an institutional network, as defined in Section 611(f) of the Communications Act, the City will require that educational and governmental access channels be designated on that institutional network to the same extent that those channels are designated on the institutional network of the City's franchised cable operator. 7. The authori~y of an open video system provider to exercise editorial control over any public, educational, or governmental use of channel capacity will be restricted in accordance with the provisions of 47 C?R § 76.1505(f) . 8. The obligation of the open video system operator to comply with all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations relating to customer service standards, including the Cable Television and Video Customer Service and Information Act (Government Code §§ !53054, et seq.), and the Video Customer' Service Act (Government Code §§ 53088, et seq.) 9. If new physical plant is proposed to be constructed within the City, the obligation of the open video system operator to comply with the following rights-of-way use and management responsibilities that are also imposed by the City upon other telecommunications service providers in a nondiscriminatory and competitively neutral manner: a. Compliance with all applicable City building and zoning codes, including applications for excavation, encroachment, and construction permits and the payment of all required permit and inspection fees. b. The coordination of construction requirements. 990125 11231-00001 SyC 0593848 2 - 15 - c. Compliance with established standards and procedures for constructing lines across private property. d. Compliance with all applicable insurance and indemnification requirements. e. The repair and resurfacing of construction-damaged streets. f. Compliance with all public safety requirements that are applicable to telecommunications service providers using public property or public rights-of-way. 10. Acts or omissions constituting breaches or defaults of the agreement, and the applicable penalties, liquidated damages, and other remedies, including fines or the suspension, revocation, or termination of the agreement. 11. Requirements relating to the sale, assignment, or transfer of the open video system. 12. Requirements relating to the open video system operator's compliance with and implementation of state and federal laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to the operation of the open video system. 13. Such additional requirements, conditions, terms, policies, and procedures as may be mutually agreed upon by the City and the open video system operator and that will, in the judgment of tlhe City Council, best serve the public interest and protect the public health, welfare, and safety. CHAPTER 7.04. OTHER TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND SYSTEMS 7.04.010 Other Multichannel Video Proqramming Distributors The term "cable system," as defined in federal law and as set forth in Chapter 7.05 below, does not include a facility that serves subscribers without using any public rights-of-way. Consequently, the categories of multichannel video programming distributors identified below are not deemed to be "cable systems" and are therefore exempt from the City's franchise requirements and from certain other local regulatory provisions authorized by federal law, provided ~Shat their distribution or transmission facilities do not involve the use of the City's public rights-of-way. A. Multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS"), also known as "wireless cable," which typically involves the transmission by an FCC-licensed operator of numerous 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 - ~6 - broadcast stations from a central location using line-of-sight technology. B. Local multipoint distribution service ("LMDS"), another form of over-the-air wireless video service for which licenses are auctioned by the ?CC, and which offers video programming, telephony, and data networking services. C. Direct broadcast satellite ("DBS"), also referred to as "direct-to-home satellite services," which involves the distribution or broadcasting of programming or services by satellite directly to the subscriber's premises without the use of ground receiving or distribution equipment, except at the subscriber's premises ,or in the uplink process to the satellite. Local regulation of direct-to-home satellite services is further proscribed by the following federal statutory provisions: 1. 47 U.S..C. § 303(v) confers upon the FCC exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the provision of direct-to- home satellite services. 2. Section 602 of the Communications Act states that a provider of direcn-to-home satellite service is exempt from the collection or remittance, or both, of any tax or fee imposed by any local taxing jurisdiction on direct-to-home satellite service. The terms "nax" and "fee" are defined by federal statute to mean any local sales tax, local use tax, local intangible tax, local income tax, business license tax, utility tax, privilege tax, gross receipts tax~ excise tax, franchise fees, local telecommunications ~ax, or any other tax, license, or fee that is imposed for the privilege of doing business, regulating, or raising revenue for a local taxing jurisdiction. 7.04.020 Video Providers -~ Registration[ Customer Service Standards A. Unless the customer protection and customer service obligations of a video provider, as that term is defined in Chapter 7.05, are specified in a franchise, license, lease, or similar written agreement with ~he City, a video provider must comply with all applicable provisions of the following state statutes: 1. The Cable Television and Video Customer Service and Information Act (Government Code ~§ 53054~ et seq.) 2. The Video Customer Service Act (Gowarnment Code §§ 53088, et seq.) B. All video providers that are operating in the City on the effective date of this title, or that intend to operate in the City after the effective date of this title, must 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 register with the City; provided, however, that this registration requirement is not applicable to any video provider that has executed a franchise, license, lease or similar written agreement with the City. The registration form must include or be accompanied by the following: 1. The video provider's name, address, and local telephone numbers. 2. The names of the officers of the video prowider. 3. A copy of the video provider's written policies and procedures relating to customer service standards and the handling of customer complaints, as required by Government Code 3§ 53054, et seq. These customer service standards must include, without limitation, standards regarding the following: a. Installation, disconnection, service and irepair obligations, employee identification, and service call response time and scheduling. b. Customer telephone and office hours. c. Precedures for billing, charges, refunds, and credits. d. Precedures for termination of service. e.. Notice ef the deletion of a programming service, the changing of channel assignments, or an increase in rates. f.. Complaint procedures and procedures for bill dispute resolution. g. The video provider's written commitment to distribute annually to the City, and to its employees and cusEomers, a notice describing the customer service standards specified above in subparagraphs (a) through (f) . This annual notice must include the report of the video provider on its perfor~nance in meeting its customer service standards, as required by Government Code § 53055.2. 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 18 -- 4. Unless a video provider is exempt under federal law from its payment, a registration fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council to cover the reasonable costs incurred by the City in reviewing and processing the registration form. 5. In addition to the registration fee specified above in subsection (4), the written commitment of the video provider to pay to the City, when due, all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the City in resolving any disputes between the video provider and its subscribers, which dispute resolution is mandated by Government Code § 53088.2 (o) . C. The City Council may establish by ordinance a schedule of monetary penalties :for the material breach by a video provider of its obligations under subparagraphs (a) through (n) of Government Code § 53088.2. As used herein, the term "material breach" means any substantial and repeated failure to comply with the consumer service standards set forth in Government Code § 53088.2. The provisions of that ordinance must be consistent with the provisions of Government Code § 53088.2. The schedule of monetary penalties may also impose a penalty, as authorized by Government Code § 53056(a), for the failure of a video provider to distribute the annual notice required by Government Code § 53055.1, which penalty may not exceed $500 for each year in which the notice is not distributed as required by state statute. 7.04.030 Antennas For Telecommunications Services The City's Zoning Code sets forth the regulatory requirements that apply to the siting and construction of various categories of antennas that are commonly used in providing or receiving telecommunications services. 7.04.040 Telecommunications Service Provided By Telephone Corporations A. The City Council finds and determines as follows: 1. The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 preempts and declares invalid all state rules that restrict entry or limit competition in both local and long-distance telephone service. 2. The Ca'[ifornia Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") is primarily responsible for the implementation of local telephone competition, and it issues certificates of public convenience and necessity to new entrants that are qualified to provide competitive local telephone - 19 990125 11231~00001 syc 0593848 2 exchange services and related telecommunications service, whether using their own facilities or the facilities or services provided by other authorized telephone corporations. 3. Section 234(a) of the California Public Utilities Code defines a "telephone corporation" as "every corporation or person owning, controlling, operating, or managing any telephone line for compensation within this state." 4. Section 616 of the California Public Utilities Code provides that a telephone corporation "may condemn any property necessary for the construction and maintenance of its telephone line." 5. Section 2902 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes municipal corporations to retain their powers of control to supervise and regulate the relationships between a public utility and the general public in matters affecting the health, convenience, and safety of the general public, including matters such as the use and repair of public streets by any public utility and the location of the poles, wires, mains, or conduits of any public utility on, under, or above any public streets. 6. Section 79011 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes telephone and telegraph corporations to construct telephone or telegraph lines along and upon any public road or highway, along or across any of the waters or lands within this state, and to erect poles~ posts, piers, or abatements for supporting the insulators, wires, and other necessary fixtures of their lines, in such manner and at such points as not to incommode the public use of the road or highway or interrupt the navigation of the waters. 7. Section 7901.1 of the California Public Utilities Code confirms the right of municipalities to exercise reasonable control as to the time, place, and manner in which roads, highways, and waterways are accessed, which control must be applied to all entities in an equivalent manner, and may involve the imposition of fees. 8. Section 50030 of the California Government Code provides that any permit fee imposed by a city for the placement, installation~ repair, or upgrading of telecommunications facilities, such as lines, poles, or antennas, by a telephone corporation that has obtained all required authorizations from the CPUC and the FCC to provide telecommunications services, must no!z. exceed the reasonable costs of providing the service for which the fee is charged, and must not be levied for genera][ revenue purposes. B. In recognition o~ and in compliance with the statutory authorizations and requirements set forth above in paragraph A, the following regulatory provisions are applicable 990125 11231 00001 SyC 0593848 2 -- 20 - to a telephone corporation that desires to provide telecommunications service by means of facilities that are proposed to be constructed within the City's public rights-of- way: 1. The telephone corporation must apply for and obtain, as may be applicable, an excavation permit, an encroachment permit, or a building permit ("ministerial permit.") 2. In addition to the information required by this Code in connection with an application for a ministerial permit, a telephone corporation must submit to the City the following supplemental information: a. A copy of the certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the CPUC to the applicant, and a copy of the CPUC decision that authorizes the applicant to provide the telecommunications service for which the facilities are proposed to be constructed in the City's public rights-of- way. b. If the applicant has obtained from the CPUC a certificate of public convenience to operate as a "competitive local carrier," the following additional requirements are applicable: (i) As required by Decision No. 95-12-057 of the CPUC, the applicant must establish that it has timely filed with the City a quarterly report that describes the type of construction and the location of each construction project proposed to be undertaken in the City during the calendar quarter in which the application is filed, which information is sufficient to enable the City to coordinate multiple projects, as may be necessary. (if) If the applicant's proposed construction project will extend beyond the utility rights-of-way into undisturbed areas or other rights-of-way, the applicant must establish that it has filed a petition with the CPUC to amend its certificate of public convenience and necessity and that the proposed construction project has been subjected to a full-scale environmental analysis by the CPUC, as required by Decision No. 95-12-057 of the CPUC. (iii) The applicant must inform the City whether its proposed construction project will be subject to any of the mitigation measures specified in the Negative Declaration ["Competitiw~ Local Carriers (CLCs) Projects for Local Exchange Communication Service throughout California"] or to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted in connection with Decision No. 95-12-057 of the CPUC. The City's issuance of a ministerial permit will be conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with all applicable mitigation measures and monitoring 990125 11231-00001 syc 05938~8 2 -- 21 -- requirements imposed by ~che CPUC upon telephone corporations that are designated as "competitive local carriers." C. In recognition of the fact that numerous excavations in the public rights-of-way diminish the useful life of the surface pavement, and for the purpose of mitigating the adverse impacts of numerous excavations on the quality and longevity of public street maintenance within the City, the following policies and procedures are adopted: 1. The City Manager is directed to ensure that all public utilities, including telephone corporations, comply with all local design, construction, maintenance and safety standards that are contained 'within, or are related to, a ministerial permit that authorizes the construction of facilities within the public rights-of-way. 2. The Ci'ty Marlager is directed to coordinate the construction and installation of facilities by public utilities, including telephone corporations, in order to minimize the number of excavations in the public rights-of-way. In this regard, based upon projected plans for street construction or renovation projects, the City Manager is authorized to establish on a quarterly basis one or more construction time periods or "windows" for the installation of facilities within the public rights-of-way. Telephone corporations and other public utiliti. es that submit applications for ministerial permits to construct facilities after a predetermined date may be required to delay such construction until the next quarterly "window" that is established by the City. D. The City reserves all rights that it now possesses or may later acquire with respect to the regulation of any cable or telecommunications serwi[ce that is provided, or proposed to be provided, by a telephone corporation. These reserved rights may relate, without limitation, to the imposition of reasonable conditions in addition to or different from those set forth in this section, the exaction of a fee or other form of consideration or compensation for use of public rights-of-way, and related matters; provided, howewer, that such regulatory rights and authority must be consistent with federal and state law that is applicable to cable or telecommunications services provided by telephone corporatiens. CHAPTER 7.05. DEFINITIONS 7.05.010 Defined Terms and Phrases A. Per the purposes of this Title 7, the words, terms, phrases, and their derivatiens set forth in this chapter have the meanings set forth below. Words used in the present tense include the future tense~ and werds in the singular include the plural number. 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 22 - "Cable service" means the one-way transmission to subscribers of video programming, or other programming services, and subscriber interaction, if any, that is required for the selection or use of that video programming or other programming service. For the purposes of this definition, "video programming" means programming provided by, or generally considered comparable to programming provided by, a television broadcast station; and "other programming service" means information that a cable system operator makes available to all subscribers generally. "Cable system," or "cable communications system" or "cable television system," means a facility, consisting of a set of closed transmission paths and associated signal generation, reception, and control equipment that is designed to provide cable service that includes video programming and that is provided to multiple subscribers within a community. The term "cable system" does not include: (i) a facility ~hat serves only to retransmit ~he television signals of one or more television broadcast stations; (ii) a facility that serves subscribers without using any public right-of-way; (iii) a facility of a common carrier that is subject, in whole or in part, to the provisions of Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, except that such facility will be considered a cable system (other than for purposes specified in Section 621(c) of the 1984 Cable Act) to the extent such facility is used in the transmission of video programming directly to subscribers~ unless the extent of such use is solely to provide interactive on-demand serw[ces; (iv) an open video system that complies with Section 653 of Title VI of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; or (v) any facilities of an electric utility that are used solely for operating its electric utility system. "Cable system operator" means any person or group of persons: (i) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in that cable system; or 990125 11231~0000i syc 0593848 2 - 23 - (ii) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of that cable system. "City" means the City of Rancho Cucamonga as represented by its City Council or by any delegate acting within the scope of its delegated authority. " CFR § "means the Code of Federal Regulations. Thus, the citation of "47 CFR 80.1" refers to Title 47, part 80, section 1, of the Code of Federal Regulations. "Communications Act" means the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. §§ 153, et seq.), as amended by the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. "FCC" or "Federal Communications Commission" means the federal administrative agency, or any lawful successor, that is authorized to regulate telecommunications services and telecommunications service providers on a national level. "Franchise" means an initial authorization, or the renewal of an initial authorizaSion, issued by the City Council, whether such authorization is designated as a franchise, permit, license, resolution, contract, certificate, agreement, or otherwise, that authorizes the construction or operation of a cable system. "Franchise fee" means any fee or assessment of any kind that is authorized by state or federal law to be imposed by the City on a Grantee as compensation in the nature of rent for' the Grantee's use of the public rights-of-way. The term "franchise fee" does not include: (i) Any tax, fee, or assessment of general applicability (including any such tax, fee, or assessment imposed on both utilities and cable operators or their services); (ii) Capital costs that are required by the franchise to be ~ncurred by Grantee for public, educational, or governmental access facilities; (iii) Costs or charges that are incidental to the award or enforcement of the franchise, including payments for bonds, security funds, letters of credit, insurance, indemnification, penalties, or liquidated damages; or 990125 11231~0000! syc 0593848 2 - 24 (iv) Any fee imposed under Title 17, United States Code. "Franchise service area" or "service area" means the entire geographic area of the City as it is now constituted, or may in the future be constituted, unless otherwise specified in the ordinance or resolution granting a franchise, or in a franchise agreement. "Grantee" means any person that is awarded a franchise in accordance with tinis title, and that person's lawful successor, transferee, er assignee. "Gross annual callhie service revenues" means the annual gross revenues derived from the Grantee's operations of its cable television system wit}bin the City, excluding uncollected bad debt, refundable deposits, rebates or credits, and further excluding any sailes, excise, or other taxes or charges that are required to be collected for direct pass-through to the local, state or federal gevernment. Revenues identified and cellected from subscribers .as franchise fees may not be excluded from a Grantee's gross annual cable service revenues. "Hultichannel videe pregramming distributor" or "videe pregramming distributer" means a person such as, but not limited to, a cable system operator, a multichannel multipoint distributien service, a direct breadcast satellite service, or a television receive-enly satellite program distributor, who makes available multiple channels olf ,zidee programming for purchase by subscribers or custemers. "Open videe system" means a facility consisting of a set of transmissien paths and associated signal generation, reception, and control equipmen5 thak~ is designed te provide cable service, including videe programming, and that is provided to multiple subscribers within the City, previded that the FCC has certified that such system cemplies with 47 CFR § 1500 e_it seq., entitled "Open Video Systems." "Open video system operator" means any person or group of persons who provides cable service over an open video system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in that op.~n video system, or otherwise controls or is responsible for i~he management and operation of that open video system. "Person" means an individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust, corporation, or governmental entity. "Public, educational or government access facilities" or "PEG access facilities," means the total of the following: 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 - 25 (i) Channel capacity designated for noncommercial public, educational, or government use; and (ii) Facilities and equipment for the use of that channel capacity. "Subscriber" or "customer" or "consumer" means any person who, for any purpose, subscribes to the services provided by a multichannel video programming distributor and who pays the charges for those services. "Street" or "public way" means each of the following that has been dedicated to the public and maintained under public authority or by others and is located within the City limits: streets, roadways, highways, avenues, lanes, alleys, sidewalks, easements, rights-of-way, and similar public property that the City from time to time authorizes to be included within the definition of a street. "Telecommunications" means the transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user's choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and receive<~. "Telecommunications equipment" means equipment, other than customer premises equipment, used by a telecommunications service prowl[der to provide telecommunications service, including software that is integral to that equipment. "Telecommunications service" means the offering of telecommunications directly to the public for a fee, or to such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the equipment or facilities that are used. "Telecommunications service provider" means any provider of telecommunications service. " U.S.C~ § "'~neans the United States Code. Thus, the citation of "47 U.S.C. § 153" refers to Title 47, section 153, of the United States Code. "Video programming provider" means any person or group of persons who has the right under the federal copyright laws to select and to contract for the carriage of specific video programming on an open w[deo system. "Video provider" means any person, company, or service that provides one or more channels of video programming to a residence, including a home, condominium, apartment, or mobilehome, where some fee is paid for that service, whether directly or as included in dues or rental charges, and whether or not public rights-of-way are used in the delivery of that video programming. A "video provider" includes, without limitation, providers of cable television service, master antenna television, 990125 11231 00001 syc 0593848 2 satellite master antenna television, direct broadcast satellite, multipoint distribution services, and other providers of video programming, whatever their technology. B. Unless otherwise expressly stated, words, terms, and phrases not defined in this chapter will be given their meaning as used in Title 47 of the United States Code, as amended, and, if not defined in that Code, their meaning as used in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. CHAPTER 7.06. VIOLATIONS; SEVERABILITY 7.06.010 Violations; Enforcement A. Any ]person who willfully violates any provision of this title is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable as provided for in Chapter 1.12 of Title 1 of this Code. B. The misdemeanor penalty specified above in paragraph (A) is not applicable to a violation of any provision of this title for which another sanction or penalty may be imposed under any franchise, license~ lease, or similar written agreement between the City and a multichannel video programming distributor or other telecommunications service provider. C. The City may initiate a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin any violation of this title. 7.06.020 Severabilit~ If any provision of this title is determined by any court of competent jurisdiction, or iOy any federal or state agency having jurisdiction over its subject matter, to be invalid and in conflict with any paramount federal or state law or regulation now or hereafter in effect, or is determined by that court or agency to require modification in order to conform to the requirements of that paramount law or regulation, then that provision will be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent part of this title, and such determination will not affect the validity and enforceability of any other provisions. If that paramount federal or state law or regulation is subsequently repealed or amended so that the provision of this title determined to be invalid or subject to modification is no longer in conflict with that law or regulation, then that provision will again become effective and will thereafter be binding on the City and any affected telecommunications service provider; provided, however, that the City must give the affected telecommunications service provider 30 days wrinten notice of that change before requiring compliance with that provision, or such longer period of time as may be reasonably required for the telecommunications service provider to comply with that provision." 990125 11231-00001 syc 0593848 2 Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and to cause this ordinance to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1999. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 990125 11231 00001 syc 0593848 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING WAIVING THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX INCREASE FOR BOOKING FEES Recommendation The City Council approve the attached Settlement Agreement eliminating the County of San Bernardino's February 11, 1999 CPI Criminal Justice Administrative fee increase for booking fees. Background The County of San Bernardino enacted a booking fee to partially mitigate the impact of the State's $431 million reduction of support to counties in 1990. Since being enacted, the booking fee has been the subject of extensive litigation. At present, all cities except one City has signed a booking fee settlement agreement with the County. The settlement agreement calls for an annual fee increase based on the Consumer Price Index to be implemented on February I1th of each year through the year 2000. Beginning February 11, 2001, the agreement requires the fee to be adjusted to the actual cost incurred by the County. Following discussion of issues at the Annual City-County Conference in November, 1998, a meeting was convened of County staff, City Managers and City Police Chiefs to discuss the issue. The County maintained that eliminating the booking fee would create a financial hardship for the County since the fee generates approximately $4 million annually. However, the discussion group agreed to explore alternatives for mitigating the fee while ensuring the roll back is revenue neutral to the County. Analysis The County agreed to waive the February 11, 1999 CPI increase. Waiving the CPI increase for one year is a first step in what will be an ongoing process to identify mutually agreeable alternatives to reducing the booking fee. The attached Settlement Agreement calls for cities to allocate to local law enforcement programs all of their savings derived from the fee reduction and to use this sum exclusively t!br law enforcement purposes within the County. Those cities that do not adopt this Settlement Agreement by April 1, 1999 will be assessed the February 11, 1999 CPI increase. Restpectfully Submitted, Xlkrry Fulwood Deputy City Manager Attachment: Settlement Agreement SanBdno Count§ Counsel Fax:9095875a62 Feb 18 1999 10:51 P. Oa 1 ,SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 2 ELIMINATING FEBRUARY 11, 1999 CRIMIN_A~t 3 JUSTICE ~i.MINIETRATIVE FEE INCRE. A81:: 4 This Supplemental Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as 5 "Agreement") is entered into between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, for itself, 6 its employees, servants, representatives, officers, officials, agents and departments 7 (hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY") and the CITY OF 8 (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"). COUNTY and CITY are collectively referred to 9 herein as the "Parties". .~ 10 CITY and COUNTY have previously entered into a Settlement Agreement 11 cancasing payment of booking and processing fees (criminal justice administrative 12 fees pursuant to California Government Code section 29550) that was incorporated as 13 ~e judgment entered by the Sacramento County Superior Court in City of 14 Adelanto, et al. v. County_ of ~an Bernardino, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding. 15 No. 2584. ~' 16 On January 26, 1999 the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Bernardino '17 passed and adopted a resolution to waive and eliminate the cdminal justice 18 administrative fee Consumer Price Index increase scheduled to otherwise automatic, ally 19 take effect on February 11, 1999, for all cities and towns which have previously entered 20 into a booking fee settlement agreement with the County that was incorporated as part 21 of the judgment in the above-referenced case, and whi=h also enter into a supplemental 22 settlement agreement with the County, in which they each agree to allocate to local law' 23 enforcement programs the entire amount of their savings derived from the fee 24 reduction, and to use this sum exclusively for law enforcement purposes within the 25 County of San Bernardino. 26 CITY now represents that it shall allocate to local law enforcement programs the 27 entire amount of its savings derived from the above-described fee reduction, and shall Ds'r 1~ 1 SanBdno Countw Counset Fax:9095875,462 Feb 18 1999 10:52 P. 05 1 use this sum exclusively for law enforcement purposes within the County of San 2 Bernardino. 3 Therefore, COUNTY and CITY agree to the following terms and conditions: 4 1. COUNTY, in consideration of the performance of all terms of this 5 Agreement by CITY, agrees to waive in full the 1999 Consumer Price Index increase 6 referred to in section 3.c. of the Settlement Agreement between the Parties concerning 7 payment of booking and processing fees (criminal justice administrative'fees pursuant 8 to California Government Code section 29550) that was incorporated as part of the 9 judgment entered by the Sacramento County Superior Court in City_ of Adelanto. et 10 v. County_ of San Bemardin~, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 2584, that 11 would otherwise autornafic, ally take effect on February 11, 1999, provided that CITY . 12 executes this Agreement prior to April 1, 1999. 13 2. In the event that CITY executes this Agreement on or after April 1, 1999, 14 COUNTY, in consideration of the performance of all terms of this Agreement by CI'I'~., 15 agrees to waive the 1999 Consumer Price Index increase referred to in.section 3.c. of 16 the Settlement Agreement between the Parties concerning payment of booking and 17 processing fees (criminal justice administrative fees pursuant to California Govemmen{ 18 Code section 29550) that was incorporated as part of the judgment entered by the 19 Sacramento County Superior Court in City. of Adelanto. et al, v. County of San 20 Bernardino, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 2584, that would otherwise 21 automatically take effect on February 11, 1999, with such waNer beginning and 22 effective in the month that CITY signs this Agreement. 23 3. CITY, in consideration of COUNTY agreeing to waive the 1999 Consumer 24 Price Index increase referred to in section 3.c. of the Settlement Agreement between 25 the Parties concerning payment of booking and processing fees (criminal justice 26 administrative fees pursuant to California Government Code section 29550) that Was 27 incorporated as part of the judgment entered by the Sacramento County Superi~ Court Z8 ~ ~ 2 /55' SanBdno Coun~9 Courtset Fax:9095875462 Feb 18 1999 10:52 P. 06 I in City of Adelanto. et al v. County of San Bemardinn, Judicial Council Coordination 2 Proceeding No. 2584, that would otherwise automatically take effect on February 11, 3 1999, agrees to allocate to local law enforcement programs the entire amount of its 4 savings derived from the above-described fee reduction, and to use this sum 5 exclusively for law enforcement purposes within the County of San Bernardino. 6 4. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be deemed breached and a 7 cause of action accrued thereon immediately upon the commencement by either party 8 of any action or proceeding contrary to the terms of this Agreement. . 9 5. The Parties fully understand and declare that, if the facts under which this 10 Agreement is executed are found hereafter to be different from the facts now.believed 11 by them to be true, they assume the risk of such possible differences in facts and 12 hereby agree that this Agreement shall be, and will remain, effective, notwithstanding. 13 such differences in facts. ... ': .. 14. 6. The Parties further agree that.this Agreement shall be binding upon the. 15 Parties, their employees, agents, heirs, representatives, successors, assigns; off'mers, 16 officials, agents, and departments, and that the benefits contained in .this :Agreement' 17 shall inureto the benefit of the Parties hereto, their employees, agents, heirs,. 18 representatives, successors, assigns, officers, officials, agents, and departments. 19 7. The Parties hereto certify they have not received any representetions, 20 or inducements from any of the Parties hereto or from their representatives 21 other than those expressed in this Agreement. The Parties further certify that they are 22 entedng into this Agreement in reliance upon their knowledge and understanding.of the 23 facts, the legal implications thereof, and the liability therefore as per the advice and 24 legal counsel of their attorneys. The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement 25 is intended only to supplement the Settlement Agreement reached by the Parties with.: 26 respect to all matters contained therein, and entered as part of the judgment, by the 27 Hon. James T. Ford in D_ity..of Adelanto. et at. v. County of San Bernardilt~3, Judicial 28 DST ~3~e3 $ COUNTY COUNSEL Fax:9095874065 Feb 18 '99 !0:55 P. 04 1 Council Coordination Proceeding No. 2584. The Parties hereby affirm their 2 understanding of the terms of that Settlement Agreement as well as this Agreement, 3 and understand and agree that they are still bound by all terms of the Settlement 4 :Agreement and the judgment in City. ofAdelanto. et el. v. County Of San Bernardino, 5 Judicial Coundl Coordination Proceeding No. 2584, that are not expressly modified by 6 this Agreement. The' Parties agree that this Agreement is a binding contract and not 7 merely a recital. The Parties further understand and agree that this Agreement may nol 8 be altered, amended, moditied, or otherwise changed in any respect or particular 9 whatsoever, except in writing duly executed by both Parties or their authorized 10 representatives. --~- 11 8. COUNTY has counseled with and has been advised by Dennis Tilton, 12 Deputy County Counsel, who is an admitted memberof the California State Bar, with 13 regard to this Agreement and the existing dispute, and executes this Agreement, 14 representing to CITYthat there has been an opportunity for full discussion and advice 15 of counsel and that the legal effects of this Agreement have been explained to 16 COUNTY lby its counsel. CITY represents to COUNTY that there has been an 17 :opportunity for full discussion and advice of counsel and that the legal effects of this 18 ~Agreement have been explalned to CITY by its counsel. 19 ///1/ 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c:)sr 136..,o3 4 COUNTY COUNSEL Fsx:909587a068 Feb 18 '99 20:56 P. 05 I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties sign this agreement on the 2 respective dates indicated below. 3 4 Approved as to form: 5 Dated: ALAN K, MARKS 6 COUNTY COUNSEL 7 By: 8 DENNIS TILTON Deputy County Cuun~ut 9 Attomeys for COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Approved as to form: 11 Dated: 12 13 By: 14 15 Attorneys for CITY OF 16 17 Dated: ....... , !999 18 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 19 By'.__ JON MIKEL$ 20 Chairman, Board or Supervisors 21 Dated: _, 1999 22 CITY OF 23 By:, 24 25 Mayor 26 27 28 os'r '~3~3 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DA :~March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARKAND ADJOINING PASEOS TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 20. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for Installation of Park and Paseo Walkway Lighting in Windrows Park and Adjoining Paseos and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The plans and specifications for the Installation of Park and Paseo Walkway Lighting in Windrows Park and Adjoining Paseos have been completed by staffand approved by the City Engineer. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 1, 1999 and April 8, 1999, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 15, 1999. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DB:dlw RESOLUTION NO. 9 q- 7.5 n RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGtlTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS AUTt!ORIZING AND DIRECTING TIlE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WIIEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGtITING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS". BE IT FURTHER'RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE TIlE tlOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON APRIL 15, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the" INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGflTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, California, marked," INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGtlTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS". Resolution No. Page 2 A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Monday, April 12, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. at Windrows Park, 6849 Victoria Park Lane, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labod Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or Resolution No. Page 3 C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Resolution No. Page 4 If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limitedto a Class A or Class B or "C-10 (electrical, general)", in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) And rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028. ! 5, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Resolution No. Page 5 In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for Installation of Park and Pasco Walkway Lighting in Windrows Park and Adjoining Paseos may be directed to: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Superintendent 9153 Ninth Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 484-2637, ext. 328 or FAX (909) 989-4131 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17a day of March i 999. ADVERTISE ON: April 1, 1999 and April 8, 1999 CITY OF RANCtIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17,1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY GENERAL PLAN. PQI,.!C!E$ AMENDMENT - SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (REF. COUNTY APPLICATION NO. GPA!CWI-849N) RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the attached urgency resolution. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS Attached for reference is a memo previously distributed dated March 3, 1999 regarding the recently proposed County General Plan Amendment. This memo outlines some of the important aspects of this issue. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reviewed the proposed County Amendment on March 10, 1999 and unanimously recommended the County not adopt the proposal until a forum of all affected cities could be held. CORRESPONDENCE A letter from the Mayor (copy attached) was sent to the County on March 15, 1999 in conformance with County requested deadlines, which contains the spirit of the proposed urgency resolution. Br§d Buller City Planner BB:LH:Is Attachments:Exhibit "A" - Urgency Resolution Exhibit "B" - Memo dated March 3, 1999 Exhibit "C" - Mayor's Letter dated March 15, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS AFFECTING SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS WHEREAS, the State adopted legislation to promote planning in areas within Sphere of' Influences which states in part; Government Code Section 65300 permitting cities to "... adopt comprehensive long-term General Plan for the physical development of the County or City and any lands outside its boundaries which, in the Planning Agency's judgement, bears relation to its planning;" and Government Code Section 56001 establishing the Cortese-Knox local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 with legislative findings and declarations as follows: The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the State to encourage orderly growth and development, which are essential to the social, fiscal, and economic well-being of the State. The Legislature recognizes that the logical formation and determination of local agency boundaries is an important factor in promoting orderly development. Therefore, the Legislature further finds and declares that this policy should be effected by the logical formation and modification of the boundaries of local agencies; and Government Code Section 56076 establishes "Sphere of Influence" as meaning a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency, as determined by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO); and Government Code Section 56300 establishes the Local Agency Formation Commission with the legislative intent to "...establish policies and exercise its powers pursuant to this part in a manner that encourages and provides planned, well ordered, efficient urban development patterns with appropriate consideration of preserving open space lands within those patterns; and Government Code Section 56301 establishes one of the purposes of LAFCO as"...the discouragement of urban sprawl..."and WHEREAS, the League of California Cities in a recently c~)mpleted study (Conflicts at the Cities Edge, Annexations, Development and Tax Negotiations, April 1996) called for a reform of County policies as follows: In order to address the issues of sprawl .... reform of current annexation process is necessary. Development within cities that can provide appropriate infrastructure must be encouraged. Cities should have more control over the logical extension of their City boundaries at usual City densities supported by usual municipal services and facilities. Finally, the Revenue and Taxation Code must be reformed to prevent annexation delays so that development proiects can proceed in a timely manner; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. SAN BERN. COUNTY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE March 17, 1999 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District became a subsidiary district of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on July 1, 1989; and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Boundaries already includes responsibility for all structure fire protection response and services within all the territory of the Rancho Cucamonga City Sphere of Influence; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reviewed the proposed. County Amendment on March 10, 1999 and unanimously recommended the County not adopt the proposal and consider retaining and strengthening the existing policies; and WHEREAS, based upon all of the previous reasons stated herein and after a review of the proposed County amendments the City of Rancho Cucamonga makes the following concerns known: 1. The proposed Amendments to adopted County General Plan policies appears to be following a pattern to back away from a previously established program of cooperation with cities to assure that urban development occurs whenever possible within cities. 2. The proposed revisions will lead to the creation of inadequately served county islands that will be problematic for the future residents, cities and the county in terms of providing quality and efficient government services. 3. The revisions are making the existing General Plan Policies less specific and therefore, may lead to legal challenges with regards to compliance with State mandated referral provisions of the existing law. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council resolves to recommend that the County of San Bernardino Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors postpone the amendment to the County General Plan in order to open a dialog concerning these issues in a broad forum with appropriate representatives from all concerned jurisdictions. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commi: ' FROM: Rick Gomez Community Deve opment D rector BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY GENERAL PLAN POLICIES AMEN£ vlENT- SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (REF. COUNTY APPLICATION. NO. GPA/CW1-849N) BACKGROUND: The City received notice from the County on March 1, 1999, that they are proposing a General Plan Amendment, that will in staff's opinion, further weaken adopted polices relative to the encouraging of annexations to cities. The Notice indicates the matter is scheduled for County Planning Commission hearing on March 18, 1999, and subsequent Board hearing on April 13, 1999. A copy of the Notice, proposed amendment/s, and Initial Study is attached for reference. Because of the short period for City response the matter has been agendized for discussion by the City Planning Commission on March 10, 1999, and City Council on April 7, 1999. In addition, a copy of the referenced materials has been for'warded to the City Attorney for legal analysis. ANALYSIS: In summary, staff believes the City should oppose the Amendment for the following reasons: 1. The proposed amendments to adopted County General Plan policies appears to be following a pattern to back away from a previously established program of cooperation with cities to assure that urban development occurs whenever pdssible within cities. 2. The proposed revisions will lead to the creation of inadequately served county islands that will be problematic for the future residents, cities and the county in terms of providing quality and efficient government services. 3. The revisions are making the existing General Plan Policies less specific and therefore, may lead to legal challenges with regards to compliance with State mandated referral provisions of the existing law. .... J MEMO GP POLICIES AMENDMENT March 3, 1999 Page 2 CONCLUSION: This memorandum reflects staff's initial reading of the County application. A thorough analysis of the law and the circumstances surrounding annexations and response by the County to City comments on applicable development requests will be provided at the previously mentioned Planning Commission and City Council meeting dates. Council and Commission Members may wish to contact their respective associates in other cities to open a dialog concerning these issues. LH:mlg cc: Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Brad Buller, City Planner Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Dennis Michael, Fire Chief Attachments SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LAND USE SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION - PROJECT NOTICE Date: February 25, 1999 VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY: COUNTYWIDE N/A APPLICANT: LAND USE SERVICES DEPT. FILE/INDEX: GPNCW1-849N The proposal affects sphere of PROPOSAL: General Plan Text Amendment to revise influence areas surrounding all goals and policies related to land use and growth management in city spheres R ~;;i~,~,~~ardino County of influence LOCATION: Sphere of Influence Areas, Countywide 0 1 1999 Proposed Environmental Determination: Negative Declaration City ot Rancho Cucamonga ATTENTION REVIEWING AGENCIES: Planning Division The General Plan Amendment described above is proposed by the San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department-Planning Division. You are invited to review the enclosed project information and submit written comments and recommendations. The Initial Study/Environmental Checklist supporting the proposed Negative Declaration is available for review in the Land Use Services Department, at the address given below. At this time, it is anticipated that the Planning Commission will consider this proposal at its meeting on March 18, 1999 and make a recommendation for action by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on Apdl 13, 1999. Notices will be mailed ten (10) days in advance of each hearing. For full consideration, your written comments should be received by this department no later than March 16, 1999. Please refer to the proposal description indicated at the top of this notice in your comments, and send them to the address or fax number provided below. No reply is necessary if you have no comments. If you have any questions, please contact the project planner, Terri Rahhal at (909) 387-4124. San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department/Planning Division Phone: (909) 387-4124 385 N. Arrowhead Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 Fax: (909) 387-3223 If you want to be notified of the project decisior~ print your name legibly on this form and mail it to the address given above, along with a self-addressed, stamped envelope. COMMENTS (attach additional pages, as needed) SIGNATURE DATE AGENCY IF YOU CHALLENGE ANY DECISION REGARDING THE ABOVE PROPOSAL IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED IN WRI'I-I'EN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE LAND USE SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE TIME IT MAKES ITS DECISION ON THE PROPOSAL OR, IF A PUBLIC HEARING IS HELD ON THE PROPOSAL, YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE MUST HAVE RAISED THOSE ISSUES AT THE PUBLIC HEARING OR IN WRI'CI'EN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE HEARING BODY AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE HEARING DUE TO TIME CONSTRAINTS AND THE NUMBER OF PERSONS WISHING TO GIVE ORAL TESTIMONY, TIME RESTRICTIONS MAY BE PLACED ON ORAL TESTIMONY AT ANY PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL YOU MAY WISH TO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING TO ENSURE THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO EXPRESS YOURSELF ADEQUATELY February 25, 1999 GPA/CW1-849N SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS AFFECTING SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS APPLICANT: San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department COMMUNITY: Countywide PROPOSAL: General Plan text amendment to revise goals and policies related to land use and growth management within city spheres of influence SOURCE DOCUMENT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN adopted July 1989 and revised November 1991 (as amended through February 1999) The General Plan text amendments presented in this proposal are based on the current San Bernardino County General Plan document cited above. A brief project summary is provided below, followed by the full text of each goal or policy affected by the proposed General Plan Amendment. Each item is identified by a General Plan goal or policy number (i.e. Goal D-60, Policy LU-9) and the beginning page number where that item can be found in the current General Plan text (i.e.p. II-D6-45). Proposed revisions are shown as str!k~_-"-t t~.~ t_" b~ d_~!~te'~ and double underlined text to be added. PROJECT SUMMARY , The proposed General Plan text amendment would revise several goals and policies related to encouragement of annexation, land use planning and growth management for unincorporated lands within city spheres of influence. It addresses and clarifies the County's approach toward coordinating planning functions and development proposal review with cities. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to clarify the land use planning authority and development approval discretion of the County Board of Supervisors in all unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County. GPA Summary 2/25/99 i SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Land Use/Growth Management Goals, Policies and Actions: · Goal D-60 encourages annexation of urbanized areas in city spheres of influence. This 'goal is revised to clarify the exception stated in it. The portion of Land Use Policy LU-9 that implements Goal D-60 is also amended, accordingly. · Goal D-61 is revised to eliminate repetition of Goal D-60, and to emphasize the · discretion of the County Board of Supervisors in determining appropriate compatibility with city development standards and public facilities. · Land Use Policy LU-9 defines the County's approach to planning and growth management in city spheres of influence. It is amended as follows, to assert the County's authority and responsibility for land use planning in all unincorporated areas: · A blanket requirement of Conditional Use Permit applications in sphere of influence areas is deleted, leaving standard County procedures in place to determine the appropriate review process. · The discretion of the County Board of Supervisors in land use planning and land development decisions for all unincorporated lands is clarified. · Instead of "reflecting" city plans for sphere of influence areas in County land use designations, the amended text requires consideration of city plans in the County review process. · Land Use Policy LU-10 addresses the need for coordinated planning efforts and cooperation with other agencies that have jurisdiction over lands within the County. It is amended as follows, to clarify the County's responsibilities: · Language that might be interpreted as a requirement to incorporate policies of other agencies in the County General Plan has been deleted. · One action item related to consultation with State and Federal agencies is deleted because another item addresses this issue ,more thoroughly. · Requirements related to participation in SANBAG to address growth management issues are deleted because they are not consistent with the current functions of SANBAG. · Land Use Policy LU-11 details incentives that should be implemented to promote urban infill. One action item related to compatibility with city policies is deleted because the same issue is addressed adequately in Policy LU-9. GPA Summary 2~25~99 ii West Valley Foothills Planning Area policie{: Two policies requiring adoption of city standards or use of "similar" standards are amended to implement County requirements in a manner compatible with city standards: · Noise: A policy requiring site planning standards similar to those of adjacent communities to reduce potential noise impacts is revised to refer to noise abatement performance standards of the County Development Code. · Hillside Development: A policy requiring adoption of the hillside development standards of adjacent communities is deleted, leaving the discretion to implement County standards and determine compatibility with adjacent communities to the County Board of Supervisors. East Loma Linda/West Redlands Planning Area Policies: The proposed General Plan Amendment includes deletion of the following two policies related to public services in the East Loma Linda/West Redlands Planning area: · Service Requirements: A policy requiring all new development in the Loma Linda and Redlands spheres of influence to comply with the service requirements of the sphere city is deleted. This leaves the authority for determining such requirements with the County Board of Supervisors, consistent with all other unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County. · Service Commitments: A policy requiring necessary service commitments prior to approval of development is also deleted. Without the city service requirement referenced above, there is no need for a specific planning area policy on service commitments. Appropriate public service commitments are already required of new development proposals in all unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County. GPA Summary 2/25/99 III SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Grewth Management Goals Goal D-60 (p. II-D6-45) The Board of Supervisors will maintain land use and growth management controls on all properties in the unincorporated areas of the County. It will consider support of annexation to cities, of properties within designated city spheres of!nfiuence, where it is deemed appropriate,' based on overall County goals in its sole discretion. Support ot such annexation applications at LAF'Co, however, will 'be in the' sole discretion ot appointed LAFCO members. Goal D-61 (p. II-D6-45) n,-,,~,, ..... ,; ...... ~,;,-~, ........... Encourage implementation of compatible development standards and public facilities in sphere of influence areas where feasible, as determined by the Boar--d--0T Supervisors in its sole discretion =.-.d _~r.c_'c'_';_~;_~ MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management Policies/Actions Policy LU-9 (p. II-D6-45) Because cities assume jurisdiotion over territo~ upoq annexation, and beoause spheres of influence identi~ ~reas that m~ be ~nnexed to ~ities, the County will oonsider ooordin~tion of its land use'~!ans within ~i~ spheres of influence with th~ affeoted oities. Neve~heless, while areas remain unin~rpomted, the Coun~ responsible br land use plannin~ and Ordedy development within these areas. development applications to affected ~ities for comment, and may r:qv~rc to conform to incorporate city development policies and standards whenever it deems appropriate. 2/25/99 1 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROVVTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management PolicieslActions Policy LU-9 (continued) Therefore, the County shall apply the following policies and standards within city spheres of influence: a. ,~ Consider implementing joint regulations/plans ':.'her. e':_~r ~e~--db!e through the adoption of oveday districts, specific plans, zoning studies, infrastructure support plans and other appropriate mechanisms. ~ b. ~ ~e~ice connections may be required for projects that are less than one = mile awa~ from sewer main lines, where the connection is available in a timely and economically feasible manner, as determined by the authorized Coun~ ~ c. ~,~ Review and ~nsider requests for city annexationSincorporation of urban = designated and sphere of influence lands based on commun~t~ interest, c~t~ abilit~ and commitment' to deveiop" and provide se~ices, and overall Count~ ~oals. Suppo~ before LAFCO for such requests, however, shall be at the sol~ discretion of appointed ~AFCO members. ~ec~ ~ ~~ Consider ~plementafion o[ gro~h control limits adopted by cities as ~hey apply to spheres, unless the Board of Supe~sors determines that the I~its would ~ateriall~ impair achievement of Count~ economic development or housin~ goals. ~ e. '~ ~ons~der Joint Po~er Agreements ~JPAs~ with cities to allow for city or = County development fees to be collected and distributed accordingly.~ 2/25/99 2 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROVVTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management Policies/Actions Policy LU-9 (continued) ~ --.~ .........~ ................................. ~ ......a ................ · f. Consider the nature and intensity of development in adjoining incorporated ;tess = and review the Gity's pre-zoning, general pl;n designations and infrast~cture plsns when establishing imgrovement levels and land use design;tions within a sphere of influence. ~ ~ Designate Sphere of Influence areas ~- ~ ~ ~"~ "*~ ~;*~* ~s ~ Planning -- Areas ;nd ~ consider speoi81 city stand;rds in these ;reas to the e~ent they are incorporated in plans adopted ;8 described in sub-policy (a), ~bove. MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management Policies/Actions Policy LU-10 (p. II-D6-46) Because the County wants to minimize land use conflicts between the County and other agencies that have jurisdictional control over lands located within the County, and because the County wants to cooperate and coordinate with adjacent municipalities and other regional agencies to address regional problems such as traffic congestion, air pollution, water quality, waste management and job/housing imbalance, the following policies/actions shall be implemented: a. Review the master plans and/or general plans of ~ affected agencies and consider those plans in the implementation of inccrppr2te 2~:,' _~nd 2!! pc!!c!c~ th_~* ~._ =.. ............ ..._...; ...... the Coun~ General Plan. pcr!ph~r2~ ~ b. Develop a procedure to assure that the County, the incorporated cities, and the = various special districts refer major planning and land use proposals to all affected jurisdictions for review, comment and recommendation. 2/25/99 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management PolicieslActions Policy LU-10 (continued) ~, c. Establish a "Review Area" around each state, military, or other Federal jurisdiction, and review development proposals or proposed General Plan amendments and revisions within the established Review Area with the appropriate agency. e., d.Work with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and other public agencies to eliminate conflicts between public and pdvate lands by reducing the checkerboard pattern of public/private ownership. ~ e. Work with BLM and the Forest Service to ensure that large blocks of public land are not further subdivided or classified as Government Small Tracts, and to ensure that disposal of public lands shall be based on definite proposals for development consistent with the County General Plan. g, f_.Work with BLM, the Forest Service and other public agencies to facilitate - public/private land exchange to eliminate the need to cross public lands to reach privately owned lands. Such land shall, when exchanged, be subject to all the policies and standards of the "Resource Conservation" (RC) District. However, if such land is determined by t?_ D."_!r.~g':,_ DM~_L"r. of the County L~nd Transportation/Flood Control Department or by FEMA to be subject to severe flooding, it shall be subject to the policies and standards of the "Floodway" (FW)' District. A General Plan Amendment is required to determine the appropriate land use designation for exchanged lands. h, g Work with BL.~ "r.d _-:'th_~: p'_'b!!_" State and Federal land management agencies in - the designation and protection of'wilderness and restricted natural areas in the approval and management of recreation events and sites.; ..... Moj~v_~ ,,,~,,:,.,..,..,, ~,.,,,,..,. ^,.,,., i, h. Work with Indian tribes and State and Federal agencies in the development of plans for land within their jurisdictions. , j, i_ Permit development adjacent to prisons and similar detention facilities only when - compatible with the security needs of the facility and public safety is assured, and: i) Work closely with State and local officials responsible for administering these facilities when considering land use proposals on adjacent lands. ii) Discourage high density residential uses on adjacent or nearby parcels. 2/25/99 4 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROVVTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management Policies/Actions Policy LU-10 (continued) ,-~,-,1~ r~H,~ r~ I~j. De~_ign=t~_ ~,~,i~A~ .,.. +~,,, ,,-'+,,/ .....,, ......,,~, .........+ ~ ....· - ,-,'-;'-"-" ; ........-~ Continue working toward a consensus on regional growth management issues ~,~th surrounding counties through SCAG anid SCAQMD. ~ k. Continue to work on specific projects to improve traffic flow, such as the Foothill Freeway (State Highway 30) extension project_., the Ro'-te 9! T::~ Force, and the Route ~_9/7! '.'.":'_~!.-.~ ..... MAN-MADE RESOURCES -Land Use/Growth Management Policies/Actions Policy LU-11 (p. II-D6-47) Because urban infilling promotes more efficient use of existing infrastructure and decreases the need to construct extension of services, the following incentive actions to encourage urban infill shall be implemented: a. Designate urban infill areas on the Infrastructure Oveday Maps as the highest intensity Improvement Levels (i.e. ILs 1 and 2) except where prohibited by other regulations and policies. b. Recommend Land Use Map changes to reflect higher intensity and compatible uses in urban infill areas, except where prohibited by other regulations and policies. c. Reduce processing times for "urban projects" (commercial, industrial and residential of 4 or more dwelling units per acre) that fall within either Improvement Levels 1 or 2 that will use underutilized infrastructure capacities as determined by the P!a."..".!.".~ O~cer Director of Land Use Services. 2/25/99 5 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROVVTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS MAN-MADE RESOURCES - Land Use/Growth Management Policies/Actions Policy LU-11 (continued) d. Direct the Department of Economic and Community Development to provide information to prospective firms, in order to recruit industrial and commercial · development to Urban Infill areas (ILs 1 or 2 with urban land use designations of industrial and commercial), and to promote use of grants for upgrading infrastructure in these areas. e. Direct all County Departments to prioritize capital improvements and public works to upgrade urban infill areas, including supporting creation of improvement districts, except where prohibited by other regulations and policies. WEST VALLEY FOOTHILLS PLANNING AREA Policies/Actions Man-made Hazards Noise Policies (p. III-B1-23) · Establish siting and construction standards to mitigate noise hazards from major traffic corridors. · Require the submittal of an acoustical analysis on all new residential projects that will be adversely impacted by existing or expected future noise generated by major transportation corridors. , !rapacts. Implement noise standards per County Development Code Sec. 87.0905. · Reduce interior residential noise levels from outside sources to acceptable levels. · Locate noise sensitive land use away from high noise areas. 2/25/99 6 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS WEST VALLEY FOOTHILLS PLANNING AREA - Policies/Actions Man-made Resources Land Use/Growth Management (p. III-B1-26) (select policies concerning hillside development) · Require a slope analysis for all residential projects located within the foothills. · Discourage residential development on land with slopes greater than 30 percent, ridge saddles, canyon mouths and areas remote from existing access. · Allow up to a 100 percent transfer of residential density from these areas depending on the holding capacity of the area to be developed. · Retaining these areas in open space will be necessary in order to obtain density bonus consideration. · Limit residential development on slopes greater than 30% to a density of two (2) dwelling units per acre or less. · Establish the following grading requirements for areas having a slope of fifteen percent or greater: - Minimize grading for roads, home foundations, pools and drainage facilities. - Utilize contour grading techniques in order to compliment and blend into the existing natural terrain. - Conceal graded slopes by landscaping and structures. - Finished slopes generally should not exceed a 2:1 ratio unless to blend with natural terrain. · Require a preliminary grading plan for all residential projects, including minor subdivisions, that are located within the foothills. · Require building foundations to conform with the natural slope on building sites, where the slope is fifteen percent (15%) or greater. · Apply strict adherence to all hillside and fire safety development standards. 2/25/99 7 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GPA/CW1-849N LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY AMENDMENTS EAST LOMA LINDA/WEST REDLANDS - Policies/Actions Man-Made Resources Land Use/Growth Management Policies (p. III-B2-29) · Permit residential development where services are readily available. Limit residential development along Interstate 10 and *"' ........ a '" ........ '- .......... State Highway 30. Limit residential development in high hazard areas. · Small neighborhood convenience commercial centers should be developed along major access routes compatible with the policies of adjacent cities. · Restrict neighborhood centers to a minimum of one mile of each other or another commercial area. · Actively pursue all available funding for sidewalk improvements, including County Capital Improvement Programs, State and Federal grant funds =.".d the _"2~c_~ c,f .... ;,,, r~ ...., .....*'" such as Community Development Block Grants for Co~ ........~ ...... ,- ........ public improvements. 2/25/99 8 RECE;.¥E[}; d. ~ 99; c~:~AM; :> H L:UCAMONGA C,OM OF_V; #2 ~1 B~l~4~i~10 COUNTY INnlAL ~ ~¥!I~AL CHECKMST FOI~4 This form and Ihe de~criptive inforrrm~ in the applk~tion p4cka~e c~titute the contents of Initial Study pur,~mnt to County Guid~lnes un4er OKIInance 3040 and ~ 1~ of lhe Slate I. PROJECT 06SCRII~ION: USGS Quad: Countywide COMMUNITY: COUNTYWIDE T,R,Section: Countywide APPLICANT: LAND U~ SERVICES DEPT. FILE/INDEX: GPA/CWl-84gN Thoma~ Brae: Countywide PROPO~: General Plan Text ~ t~lm~d ~e and ~ ~t in city spl~re~ of Influence OLUD: Various LC:~_,ATK~N: ~ of Infirmnee, ~x~ntl~ Improvement Level: Various I:~OJ ECT CHARACTERISTICS: The project is a peoposed amendmor~ to the text of Ihe San Bernardino County General Plan. It management ar~ ~ um pi~nnir~ for un~ ~ in city apt'rare of irdluence planning PROJECT SCOPE Thi~ InllJal ~udy evaluelm~ polenl~ envirormrmm~ effec~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ex~ s~ an~,~~~~lnu~~~~~of pl~ a~ ~~t ~~s ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ e~~l ~ p~ p~~ ~ CEQA ~ ~ ~ tm~ a~ ~ a~~ ~~, ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR8 POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmenial faclom checke4 below ~ be potenbelly aliceted by tl~ project, Involving at least one trr~act that Is a 'Potenbel~ $1~nificant ImlX~' as ~ IW the ct~:ld~ on r'-] Mineral Resources ['-I Nolte r"l Population I Housing [] Public Services [] Recreation [] Tmnsporlation/Traffic DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the l:~ais of this/I evaluation, the following f. Ming is [] The propcae~ project COULD NOT have a Mgnillcanl effect on Ihe ~ an~ a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] Nlheugh the ~ project cou~ have a agnilicant effect on the awironmont, there will not bee project ~. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] The proposed project MAY have a MgnBcant effect on Ihe environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ta. r~luired. mitigated' impact on the environment, but at lea~t one effect 1) ha~ been adequately analyzed M an earlMr document pursuant to aplNteabM legal standards, end 2) ha~ been a~lreeeed by mlligation IMPACT REPORT is required, but it muat amayae ~ the ef/ee~ that remain to be addressed. [] ,Nthough the proposed project could have · significant effect on the efwl~t, because all pote~lly significant effects (a) have been analy'~l~d adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pumuant to applicable standards, and (b)have been avoided or miltgat~ pumuant to that ea~er EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including ~ or millgallon mea~x~ that are imocaed UlXm the p~ project, nott~ng rure~er sigr..tum (propreed by) ]4A.~ 03 ' 99 fWED) C9 06 PA0?. 4/2S GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT clarify the exception staked in it. The portkin ~ Land UIm Policy LU-9 ~ ~ this goal is also ,,mendid, ac:cxxdkxJly. · A blanket requirement of Conditional Usa Permit appliGalk)n6 in sphere of infiuenoe areas is deleted, · The ~ of Ihe ~ Boarcf of 8upmMsom in kind use phmrdng and Imtd cMvelopn~nt decisions for all uniiYmrpomted hahale hi elartflecl. Land Usa PMley LU-10 addroaMs the need for coordinated planning efforts and ccq)mation with other agen(:ies that Ilave juriadicUon over larKks wihin the County. It is arneqxled as follows, to cleitfy the County's reepcmM,ee: · Language that might be interpreted as · requirement to incorporate policies of other agencies in the County General Pt~ has been deleted. · One action item relalXKI to conmJltlilon with State and Federal Agencies Is deleted because another item addreem~ this iMue more lho~. · Recluirement~ related to participation in SANBAG to address growth management iseue6 are deleted because they are not cmasistent with the current func~ns of SANBAG. Lami tin Policy LU-11 dMMW incentives thai shoulcl be implenmnted to pmmo~ urban inM. One aclion item related to compMtbill~ with city polldes is deleted becaaoee the same isiue ie addreased eclequMe4y in Pol~'y LUg. RECEIVED: 3- 3. 99; 9:00Aid; =~ R C,,.:CAIHONLiA COM ,JEV; ~b MA.%. O~ ' 99 ~'NED) 0~:06 PAGE. 5/2~ P lnli · HIIlaa ~m~: A ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~lb~e de~nt ~~ of ad~nt T~ ~ ~al P~ ~~ i~ ~n ~ ~ f~l~ ~ ~s ~d ~ pu~ic ~ ~m~ ~ ~~ ~h ~ ~n~ ~ ~ 8u~m, ~ ~ all ~ ~ ~ eme ~ ~ ~ ~mWn~. ~ puM~ ~ ~mWn~ em ~ui~ ~ ~1M~ ~ el ~ ~~ ~ end ~ ~nM ~ a~ ~ ~ie In*M ~.) 'The existing site i~ cz~X~sed of all uninmqxx'aled lands within deelgrmled ~mree of intkxxx:e at the 24 ~ in San ammd~ County, and ae~ urlmaqx:x~l~ mem ~ to fedmm Im~. This ~ eemng It Is 8mraunded m the north, eoulh and wear ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of Inyo, Kern, Rivera~le, Orange and Los Angeles. The eastam bcxmdmy of the Caenty, as drained by the Colinado River, abuts the states of Nevada and Altzefia. The C~xmty ccxlsie~ of three ~ geograpl~ area~, each with unique natural and 4 RECEIVED: 3- 3-99; 9:00AM; =;' R CUCAMONGA COld DEV; MAR. 03 ' 99 ,'WED: ¢9: C6 PAGE. 6/23 flat vagey lieor. Most of me rmtu~ ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ I~ ~ plant Itabila~ remaln. including alluvial fan sage scrub, Chal:)mTaL ripaden ~, g~ and wethinds. The valey area has a ~nean elinmle, wtth hot, dry sumrears and mild wlnlem. Teml:)egllur(m ramge from occaeek~ad frosts in the rahlfa# of appmxk~nmly foudeen to a, wenteen btehes. Hills, Colon, Fontaria, Grand Teemca, Higtdand, Lome LbS, ~, Oralalto, Ramd~ ~, Redlands, Riallo, San Oerrmdlno. Ulcdmtd, and Yuceipe. Mountain and dry hakes. Mo~t of the Desert Regkxq is ~ of undmadoped federal lands administered by the BLM, NaUon~ Padc Senate and vam:~ mH#my ~ of the Oepartnm~ of Dellame, The D~ P. eS~:~ contains The deeeft po~ is sparue (<20% of totad Co~ pop.), and i#)pftwifnately 60% of it is clustered in eight desert 'cdies. The five North Deeeft c#t~ of~ Barntow, F#op~ ~alnd the Town of Apple Vaky Twentynh~ Palma and the Town of Yucca relay are located in the more ~ eouitleae~em portion of the MA.%. 05 ' 99 :WED) 09 0,7 PAGE. 7/23 II.AGRICULTURE RE~,OURCE$-- In delmm#dng Asmmsme~ Model (1997) prepared by the California the pro~c~ a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmtan(I of $talew~e Importance (Faradand), as shown R~.CEIvED: 3- 3-99; 9:01AM; =-- R C. LiCAMONGA C0M L]~:V; #8 ~[^A. 03 ' 99 ',WED', 09:07 PAC.-'. 8/23 III. AIR QUALITY-- Where available, the ~ignil~.~me crNeria eatabashed by the applicable air quality management or air poilulion 0ontrol di~tdot tony be a) Conflict with or obeb'uct implefTmntation of the app#clmble ~ quality plarl? 0 [] [] [] 7 d) Expoee sensitive re;eptnm to substantial pollutant IV. ~10LO~.AL REIOURCEI-- Would the project: a) Have e sui~bm'd~l ~ effec~ e#her direc:~ or through habtlat rnodtticmbx~, on any species !alehUrled a~ a candkJal~, serra#rye, or specbd stalus species in ~ I~nt of Fi~ and G~t~e o~ U.S. FIM1 and WUd [] [] [] [] b) I-I~v~ A ~ub~4~nt~ mdv~nm ~ on ~qy rip~n habitat o~ ~her mm~dt]ve rmluml community ~ in VVtldlife S~m~d~? 0 C] I--I ~] prot~t~ weUmms as defined by Section 404 o~ the Clmm W=tm' Ac~ (including, bm not limited to, memh, verrml pool, cc~stal, etc.) thn:~jh direct remmml, filling, hydrologiml Int~rrupth~l, or other means? [] [2] [] [] RECEIVED: 3- 3-99; g:O2AU; => R CUCAWONGA COM DEV; #10 W~R. 03 ' 99 ~WED] 09:08 PAGE. :0/23 d) Intorfem substiln#ally wilh the movement of any nalive e) Cordlict will~ any local policies or ordtnanc~ proloel#~ btOk3gical ~, su(~ as a b'ee f) Conflict wtlh me provP~dom of ~n adoplmd l-labll~ SUBSTANTIATION (che~k if project is k)catml in the Bk:dogicad Resources Overlay.~.X or cx3matns habitat for any specte~ Ita#d k't lhe Cadifomha NaJJral Diverally ~ X ): V. CULTURAL RF.~OU~-- Would Ihe pmje~: a) Cause a ~131tJltlai adveme change in the significance of 11 htModml rem:mrce as defined in 615064.5? I'-I' [] [] [] b) Cause a .ul~ adv. n~ ch,m~ in lhe ~ of an arclmJ31oglcal reeoume pumuant to c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique pJlJonlok)gical reaource or e~ or urdque geologic feature? [] [] [] [] 9 RECEIVED: 3- 3-99; 9:02AM; => R CUCAMONGA C0¥ DE¥; #11 IV,,AE. 03 ' 99 ~WED~ 09:¢8 PAGE. PMen!Ie~ Le# thim Le# titill No d) Disturb any huI/tM1 remains, including tho6e interred SUBSTANTIATION (check if the project Is located in lite Cudrural X or ~_~X ~ overtaya or die resul~ ot oultuml resource review): The policy chang~ ~ in ~his General Plen Anuexlnunt ~e nol expecteel to r~ult in any ~]nificant remains unincxxlxxaled, under County j~ No ~ are plopoecd for any gol!lll, ~ or action rem)uix:~s. VL GEOLOGY AND 8OI1.~- Would the project: a) Expose pooplo or olrudums to pomntlal eubemfitifd i) J:~tpture Of a kJxp.~ eerthqueke bu#. as do#mWmd m the meet recent Alqu~-~ Earlhquake Fault Zoning Map iaaued by Ihe ~ Gaeloglat for the area or beesd on other .ulmtanttal evidenoe of a known fault? Refer to ,) strone esma:amu.d shaking? I"1, I"1 r-'l Igl iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including iv) Landa,des? [] I"1 ID [] b) Result in substantial imil erosion or the loss of topsoil?[] [] [] [] 10 RECEIVED: 3- 3-99; 9:03AM; => R CUCAMONGA COM DEV; #12 w~R. 03 99 ,w_D, 09:08 P~.G~. ~2/23 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil tha~ m unstable, an~ ~ result in on- or o~f-atle lallCtl#~. ~ ~m~Mno, ,ubddem~. ~ or edmpm? 0 0 0 d) Be located ~n exp~nsNe s~l, ~s def~ ~ T~b~ ~8 w~ m pm 11 RECE.T. VED: 3- 3-99; ~):03AM; ~> ~ CUCAMONGA C0M ~EV; #t3 Y~I;i.. 03 ' 99 ~W~D; 09:09 PAC. E. ~/23 b) Create a significant hazard to the pubBc or the envitx:xm~mt through masonably foreseeable upeet and one-<lUarter mile of an exbting or proposed selx)ol? [] I-1 [] !~1 d) Be located on a e#e which k~ included on a ~et of Government Code Sectioe 65962,5 and, as a result, would it create a significant h.m'~rd to the public or the f) For a proje~ ~n tl~ vi~n#y of a private alr~, would the ixojea result in a ~afety hazard for people g) Impair iml;Im'nen~alk)n o(~ I:~rSically in~m'fe~ with an .ClOlX:KI ~ncy re.~oonae plan or eraregency h)EXlX3e~ IX~ or =lnx=lurm tDa aigrdk=ant ri~k czf Ioe~, Injury or death tnvoMng wikllm~ fire~, including where The p~ c~ city a~ long as an area rerrat~ uni~. under C_,axey jurladica3n. No changes are pmpme~ for any 12 RECEIVED: 3- 3-99; 9:03Akl; ::> R CUCAMONGA COk( DEV; #14 MA.%. O~ '99 ,'WED~ C9~C9 P~G~. '.4/2~ As an incllreat re~tt of mm pmie~, more properlee n~y aevem~ under ~ md u~e jurisdictl~ instead of annexing to cm~. F~ un~ weuia not ~fleet e~tming hee#h m relmml to haza. X~ VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY-- Would the a) Violate any water quality standards or wa~te d~ b) Sutwamllaay deraete groundwater suppm~ or lnmdere would t:ae a net deJk:dt tn aquifer voiume or a ~ng of the Jocal groundwater table leve~ (e.g.. the produceon rate of pm-e)da~ hereby web would drop to a level am for,,~u, perm~ hay, b,~ grar,~)? 121 [] 121 19:i ¢> Subslankily aller ~he ex~ing drainage patram of tl~ coume ofa m or firm. in a manner ~ ~ d) SubstantiaNy alter the exisling drainage pattom of Ihe s~ or area, trwkxltng through the eaeration of the m of alm or river. or ~ubellmtk~ inclsmm 11H~ rate or arnmmt of surface ranoff In e ramher vdach would e) Create or contribute runeIf water which would exoeed $yeten~ or provide eubelanttml addSo.el em,a'eee of, ~,ut~ runafr~ r'l [] [] [~ ~ other~ ~utmmlie~ deemae ~ quamy? r"l C3 [] [] g) Pine houmng within a '100-y~' iloacl mm ~r~ ~ rapped on a federal Flood ~ Boundmy or Flood Ineumnoe I:~te M~p or other ~ Ima~rd delineeticm 13 RECEIVED: 3- 3-gg; g:O4AM; => R CUCAUONGA CO¥ O£V; #15 MAP-.. 03 ' 99 ~WED; C9:09 PAGE. ',5/2,3 h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area slnx~res inju~y or e.ae, Involving emxl~. lnal~ Ikxxling aa m SU~~~N: ~~~~in~s ~ ~~~t~ ~~~~any~nt b) Cord#ct with my ~l~k~ble land u~ pkm, pollc~, or plan, local meelal program, or zaning oralname) adopted for the purpoee of avoiding or mitigating an or natural oommuntb. conaervmion plan? [] [] [] I~ 14 ]¢.AR. 09 ' 99 ',WED*, ~9:: O ?A~E ~. 6/2~ SUBSTANTIATION: The policy changes propo~d in thi~ General Plan ~ am not expeclad to ma~lK in any Mgnificant County jumdeUon. This wo~ld he~p Ixevem the divlelon of ealabllat~ un~ commurdl~, oral would not cord!lct with any X. MINERAL RF..80URCE8-- Would the a) Result in the Ioea of availability of a known mineral reaource that would be of value to the mgk~ and the b) Result in the Ioo8 of availability of · locally mlrleml re~3uroe recovery site delinea~d on a Iooat SUBSTANTIATION (check X~ if proje~l~looaledw#hln Ihe Mlneral Raaour~ZoneOvmlay): The policy changea rm3poaed in !t~ Gene~ Plan Amenclinoril am not expecled to mault in any significant irares telfried t~ mM resources. This protect wig hero no direct pt~/siml Irv~Mcts o~ the envJrofiment, and the afinexJ~ to citJos. Remat~ ufilneomem~d would not offuct existing mineral resourcos. Stafide~ County development review procedures, including a ~ of the General PIm Mnoral Rooource Overlay and 15 F~R. 03 ' 99 :WED; 39::0 PACE. :7/23 16 RECEIVED: 3- 3-gg; g:O5AU; => R CUCA~ONGA COU DEV; #~8 MAP,.. O~ ' 99 ~WED~ 09:: I PAGE. 18/2~ a) Induce eubmantlal popummm gnw~ in an area, either dimc#y (for exmmpte, by propmdng new homee and busl~) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roa<b or other k~ms~re)? D [] [] J2] b) Dimplace subsrental numbera of existing houeJng, c) Oi,plmm aubmmmiel numbecru of people, neeemeJmmg SUBSTANTIATION: to homing. This project will have no direct physk:ml Wnpeo~ on Ihe enWonnmnt, bu~ it may inetmine the likelihood for projec~ a) Would the project result in substantial adverse Police protection? [] [] [] [] 17 RECE[VEO: 3* 3-99; ~):05AId; => R CUCA~tONGA COM OEV; 8) Would Ihe I~ im:xeese Ihe use uf existing neighlxx'lxx)cl ~ regionel parks or oilier reereatio4~l b) Doe~ tt~e project include recrealiemd ~ or ~JB~TANTIATION: in sphere area~ to be apl~wed ar~ devdem~ under the County's ]urt~lictbr~ based m Cou~ land u~e Idans. Since this w~ld no~ cooatilule a depadum from exlsllng plam~ land u~e, no eignlflomt eovironmerdal iml:~acts on recreaOo~ re~urm~ are ~. 18 PoWfitla#y LEeS then I. EM than XV. 111.J, NM)ORTATION/TRAFFIC- Would the project: relation to the existing tramc load a~ cape~y' of the ,tn)M Wstent (i.e., rMult in I eubetlmltd irmrejm in ellbin' on roeds, or congestion at intemeelior~)? b) Exceed, ellher i 'ndrwltmlly or cumulatively, = level of sendee slandmci establMmd by the (xxJnty (xmoeslkm c) Result in & dmnge ~ air traf~ i:~tlmT~, i~in9 that results in n, ubetantiet SM~l)ty risks? I-'] J-"J d) Substantially trN=reMe hazards due to a design Mature (e.9., M~rp cuwes or dangelO~ tnterM)clk~) or In=ornp,,,bk, .... (e.g., TBrm ~u~m)? i"] I--I I"1 [] e) F.e,u# in inadequate emergency ace.s?[] [] [] supporting elternntive transpore#on (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle mc~s)? r-'l [] I~ r-] $UBB'rANT1ATION: The policy changes proposed in this General Plan Amendment am not expected to result in any Ngntficant dilhmmo~ in fulur~ I~YI ~ ~ ~ no ~nt Mbct on vehic~ ~lk= o~ oiler mock~ of annexing to cities. Remaln~ uni~ ~ not MIKt e)(Mling I~ infmstruclure. Standard County deve~ review ~, inctudlx; ~ review of the (3erierid F~n ClmMlkm EiefrMmt end the plans 19 RECE].VEO: 3- 3-9g; 9:06AM; => R CUCAMONGA COM OEV; #21 ~.AR. C~ ' 99 (WED; 09: :t PAOE. 2~/2~ a) Exceed waetewat~ tmabnm'd requirements o~ ~ ~) ~~~~of~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ of~U~ w~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d) ~ ~s~ ~ · ~11(s)~~~ ~T~IAT~: ~ s~ ~i~ ~ ~1~ ~~ ~nn~ ~~. ~ ~ ~~ ~s pm~ ~1 ~ ~ di~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~L ~ ~ i~r~ t~ lik~i~ ~ ~ ~ s~em ~ ~~ a~s to ~ ap~ and ~ ~ ~ ~'s N~~ ~ ~ ~n~ p~ ~i~~uUli~~.F~~~ ~~~~~y~~,~t 2O RECEIVED: 3- 3-g9; 9;06AM; => R CUCAMONGA COa OEV; #22 I~.AR. 03 ' 99 ~V~'__I~ 09: '.2 PACE. 22/2~ potenlial differences in planning and ~ judm~llon woukl have no ~Jgnirmanl adverse environmenial effects. infmllnJcSul~ fro' n~w ~ in un~ al~l~. c) Does ~e projKt have ee~rom~entM ®ffe~ which ~1 ~ 51.JBSTANTIATION: wtth cities in the review of devlloplllefll ~ ~ ~ gival the Cmmly Bol~d ~ 8Upll~ M:)eolute dlscretio~ in all unincorpmatad emM. The rMult b ~ ~1~ County ~11 no( tm (]Mged k) iml~m~, dry pl~r~ or 21 RECEIVED: 3- 3-99; 9.'OOAhd; => R C~CAMONGA COM OE¥; #23 F~AR. 03 ' 99 (WED; 09:: 2 PAGE. 23/23 been t~M~nd asa pomdei ~lhm ~ ~o a Nqntlve Oectarall~ shoutl tm 22 T Hi E C I T Y O F A N C H O C U C A N O N O A March 15, 1999 Chairperson Members of the San Bernardino County Planning Commission 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 RE: COUNTY GENERAL PLAN POLICIES AMENDMENT- SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (REF. COUNTY , APPLICATION NO. GPA/CWl-849N Honorable Chairperson and Members: The City received notice from the County on March 1, 1999, that the County is proposing a General Plan Amendment, that will affect development activity in our Sphere of Influence. The proposed changes appear to further weaken adopted polices relative to the encouraging of annexations to cities. The Notice indicates the matter is scheduled for County Planning Commission hearing on March 18, 1999, and subsequent Board hearing on April 13, 1999. Because of the short period for City response the matter was agendized for discussion by the City Planning Commission on March 10, 1999, and the City Council is expected to hear the item under urgency resolution on March 17, 1999. The City respectfully requests this matter be postponed until a meeting can be held between responsible County and City representatives to discuss the proposed General Plan Amendment. The basis of our request comes from the following concerns: 1. The proposed Amendments to adopted County General Plan policies appears to be following a pattern to back away from a previously established program of cooperation with cities to assure that urban development occurs whenever possible within cities. 2. The proposed revisions will lead to the creation of inadequately served county islands that will be problematic for the future residents, cities and the county in terms of providing quality and efficient government services. 3. The revisions are making the existing General Plan Policies less specific and therefore, may lead to legal challenges with regards to compliance with State mandated referral provisions of the existing law. Because this Amendment affects all cities in the County, we are receptive to open a dialog concerning these issues in a broad forum with appropriate representatives from all concerned jurisdictions. Sincerely, ~ ,,q .~ William J. Ale/~der, Mayo ' LJH:mlg cc: Jon MikeIs, Supervisor Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Chairperson and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Terri Rahhal, Project Planner ~,~.~].,, 2r ','; 'cm J A'.~,<qncJ,-' .~.-. ,~c:'.r,'n. ernber Pod %k:',or Pro-Ter'n Di~no V~':h,am3 Cc,~nc~lrnember Boo D,~tt)n uac'x Lot'n, A ,--~ ~', Co,,Jncilmember Jor~;es V 10, SCOC~'xc Center Dr.ve · ~0 Bo.~ ~37 · RancnoCuccmc,"_~3. C:,'01729 · (909',477-2700 CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, ! 999 TO: Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City iManager FROM: William J. Alexander, Mayor BY: iRick Gomez, Community Development Director SUBJECT: REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION: ~71 Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 99-__ Calling for a Regional Airport Master Plan for Southern California. BACKGROUND: The Los Angeles Department of Airports is proposing to revise its Airport Master Plan to reflect a regional expansion of passenger and freight activity. Concerns about the associated increase in pollution and congestion have been raised by cities in proximity to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Those cities have become a catalyst for an effort to develop a regional airport plan that would evaluate the expansion of LAX in comparison to the commercial potential of other airports throughout the region. Many cities opposing the LAX expansion plan believe a thorough analysis must be performed relative to the LAX expansion to ensure that the entire region benefits from anticipated passenger and freight growth and economic development. The results of a Master Plan would ensure effective utilization of all regional airports. The proposed creation of a Regional Airport Plan would provide information about the commercial potential of the Inland Empire airports including Ontario International Airport (ONT), March Air Reserve Base, Norton Air Base and George Air Base. The continued marketing and development of ONT is important to the regional economy of the Inland Empire. Though a regional evaluation of population/business growth and resulting increases in passenger and cargo activity, the Airport Master Plan would produce objective recommendations which would benefit the entire Inland Empire. Additionally, issues of regional environmental itnpacts would be evaluated in the Airport Master Plan Environmental Impact Report; air pollution, :noise abatement, ground and air transportation safety and congestion and air traffic safety management issues would be evaluated based on potential growth scenarios and mitigating measures would be developed. On March 3, 1999, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) adopted a similar Resolution supporting a Regional Airport Master Plan. Respectfully submitted, William J. Alexander Mayor Attachment ITY ()[: RAN('HO ('UCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM I1 - MARCH 17, 1999 Attached is the "Amended" Staff Report for City Council Agenda Item I1: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Thank you. kls attachment CITY ()F ~AN(,HO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. Alexander, Mayor BY: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director SUBJECT: REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 99-D__7/Calling for a Regional Airport Master Plan for Southern California. BACKGROUND: The Los Angeles Department of Airports is proposing to revise its Airport Master Plan to reflect a regional expansion of passenger and freight activity. Concerns about the associated increase in pollution and congestion have been raised by cities in proximity to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Those cities have become a catalyst for an effort to develop a regional airport plan that would evaluate the expansion of LAX in comparison to the commercial potential of other airports throughout the region. Many cities opposing the LAX expansion plan believe a thorough analysis must be performed relative to the LAX expansion to ensure that the entire region benefits from anticipated passenger and freight growth and economic development. The results of a Master Plan would ensure effective utilization of all regional airports. The proposed creation of a Regional Airport Plan would provide information about the commercial potential of the Inland Empire airports including Ontario International Airport (ONT), March Air Reserve Base, Norton Air Base and George Air Base. The continued marketing and development of ONT is important to the regional economy of the Inland Empire. Though a regional evaluation of population/business growth and resulting increases in passenger and cargo activity, the Airport Master Plan would produce objective recommendations which would benefit the entire Inland Empire. Additionally, issues of regional environmental impacts would be evaluated in the Airport Master Plan Environmental Impact Report; air pollution, noise abatement, ground and air transportation safety and congestion and air traffic safety management issues would be evaluated based on potential growth scenarios and mitigating measures would be developed. On March 3, 1999, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) adopted a similar Resolution supporting a Regional Airport Master Plan. Respectfully submitted, William J. Alexander Mayor -- Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~/""'~ 7/ A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Department of Airports has initiated a revision of the Master Plan for Los Angels International Airport (LAX) which anticipates expanding its passenger activity from a current 60 million passengers per year to an expected 98 million passengers per year and its cargo activity from its current 1.8 million tons per year to an expected 4.2 million tons per year; and, WH EREAS, expanding LAX's passenger and cargo activity as proposed will greatly increase the number of flights and nearly double ground traffic going to and from LAX; and, WHEREAS, communities in the vicinity of LAX which already experience enormous adverse environmental impacts from the operations of the airport can expect greatly increased noise and air pollution from overhead aircraft, and greatly increased congestion and air pollution from ground traffic, especially from dramatic increases in the activity of diesel trucks around the airport; and, WHEREAS, airport officials estimate the LAX improvements will cost as much as $12 billion, not including the costs of transportation improvements required to facilitate access to LAX which will be paid for by regional tax payers; and WHEREAS, there are many other commercial airports in Southern California, some with significant histories as commercial airports, and some recently converted to commercial or joint military and commercial airports; and, WHEREAS, several of these airports are located in areas of Southern California expected to experience the greatest growth in population and employment over the next twenty years, while LAX is nearest to communities expected to experience the least growth in the same period; and, WHEREAS, developing airport capacity near high growth communities rather than concentrating airport development at LAX may be an environmentally superior, lower-cost and more equitable strategy for serving future growth in air commerce in Southern California; and WHEREAS, the development of these regional airport resources will help spread jobs and economic development opportunities more equitably throughout the region, and reduce the public health and environmental burdens on communities near LAX. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA calls upon The communities of Southern California, including the City of Los Angeles; the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Ventura; the State of California; and our congressional representatives to join together in developing a regional Airport Plan for Southern California that constrains LAX to operate within the capacity of its existing facilities and develops the capacity of the many other commercial airports in Southern California to serve the expanding air commerce marketplace. Making a Case for a Regional Airport Plan for Southern California Full Disclosure: The El Segundo community has concerns regarding the expansion of LAX Admittedly, the community of El Segundo has special reasons to be concerned about the proposed expansion of Los Angeles International Airport. We share our northern border with the airport. We also share all of the burdens associated with having the largest airport in California as our nearest neighbor - more than our fair share of airport related noise, traffic congestion, and air pollution. As you can imagine, we watch what goes on at LAX closely. When Los Angeles airport officials first released their plans for dramatically expanding activity at LAX, we asked the following questions: Is it Safe? Is it Fair? Is it Prudent? Is it Necessary? Should communities in the vicinity of LAX have to bear the burden off · increased congestion in our skies; · increased noise from overhead aircraft and airport operations; · impossible congestion on our already over-congested surface streets and freeways; · significant increases in air pollution, especially from diesel trucks hauling cargo to and from the airport; · the excessive costs of building an expanded LAX. ... when the growth in regional air traffic may be far better served at a lower cost by improving facilities at Southern California's other commercial airports. We think not. Here's part of the reason why. Why Do We Need to Expand Airports At All? Reeional Growth ! The current debate over expanding airport capacity is driven by projections for growth in demand for air commerce in Southern California over the next twenty years. New airport demand is largely a product of the projected 40% growth in population and even greater increase in employment in Southern California over that period. More new people more gainfully employed in Southern California means more people wanting to fly. It means more businesses engaged in commercial activity requiring commercial passenger or cargo services. It means more demand for goods from other countries, particularly Pacific Rim countries; perhaps, when the Asian economic crisis is over, there may be more demand for our goods as well. The result: increased demand for commercial air flights, both passenger and cargo. We believe that an expanding air commerce marketplace can be good for our economies and good for our communities. Even so, the real issue remains: How do we best meet this new demand for commercial air services? By expanding LAX as proposed? Or, By m. aking better use of the many other commercial airports in South ertl California ? We believe that key issues in this discussion are, Where will growth in Southern California occttr over the next twenty years? Are there airport resources located nearer' these centers of growth that can more fairly capture the new air travel demand with less environmental burdens and at a lower cost than endeavoring to capture most of this new demand at LAX? Growth in population and employment is not evenly divided throughout Southern California. In fact: Regional Growth is Greatest in Areas Most Remote from LAX Subregion % increase in expected pop. expected total % increase in population increase pop. In 2020 employment North LA County: 169% 762,000 1,213,000 199% West Riverside 110% 1,225,900 2,340,800 174% County San Bernardino 82% 1,271,700 2,830,000 127% County Coachella Valley 81% 213,200 475,000 82% Total Growth in Areas 3,472,800 6,858,800 Remote to LAX As Projected in SCAG RTP Regional Growth Is Slowest Nearest LAX % increase in expected pop. expected total % increase in Subregion population increase pop. In 2020 employment Gateway Cities 19% 386,500 2,368,600 40% South Bay Cities: 13% 106,600 925,600 36% Westside Cities: 11% 26,000 253,000 20% Total Growth in Areas 519,100 3,547,200 Nearest LAX As Projected in SCAG RTP Even in terms of raw numbers the growth is greater in areas farthest from LAX. The Fact is: Areas of Southern California Once Thought of as Rural Will Soon be Very Urban Does it make sense to centralize our airport facilities at LAX while the population of Southern California becomes increasingly decentralized? We think not. We should remember that we are not planning our airports to meet today's needs; rather, we are planning for the ~owth expected in the next twenty years. Areas of Southern California which may seem remote and less developed now will become very urban during that time. Yet, the unfortunate truth is: There is no regional plan to develop existing airports in the high growth areas of Southern California. Until now, with the convening of the SCAG Aviation Subcommittee, there wasn't even a process to develop such a plan. Nevertheless, the local communities where these airports operate are energetically pursuing their own plans to develop their airports, in most cases with strong local political support and little opposition. Consider: In twenty years, the population in the Inland Empire - including the Coachella Valley - grows to nearly 6 million people. It will become one of the great urban areas of the nation. More people will live and work there than in the City of Los Angeles. This region has several existing airports to serve its needs, including, by their familiar names, March, Norton, George, Palm Springs, and Ontario airports. These airports need regional support to gain the resources they need for their development in order to give them a fair shot at a fair share of the air commerce marketplace. Consider: In twenty years, the population of North Los Angeles County, including Santa Clarita, Palmdale and Lancaster, is expected to nearly triple. It will become an urban area of over one million people. Palmdale Airport will be far closer to these population centers than LAX or even Burbank. This airport can serve passengers and cargo needs of the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley as well. High speed rail, should it occur and connect to Palmdale Airport will clearly expand their potential marketplace. Consider: Even Orange County needs its own regional and international airport service. While its population will grow more slowly than other parts of the region, Orange County's employment base is expected to grow by nearly 70%. Airport planners see the growth in air traffic emanating from Orange County to be particularly significant. It makes no sense for Orange County residents and businesses to continue to seek their air commerce services at LAX, adding unnecessarily to the burdens experienced by LAX neighbors, when they could better be served in their own backyard. Consider: Ventura County will also experience very significant new growth, especially in terms of employment - again a key variable for airport planners. The newly developing commercial airport at Point Mugu can absorb much of this significant new opportunity with appropriate regional support. Again, it makes little sense for this region to continue to drive to LAX for all their air travel services when resources can be made available more locally. All of these ne, v growth communities have airports of their own to develop. These airports have runways; they have operators; and they often have strong community support. A primary barrier to success of these airports is competition for regional and federal transportation dollars and the perception among airlines that the region will let LAX expand indefinitely to capture new growth in the marketplace. Only by deve16ping a genuinely ~r_egio~Lp2an, a plan that requires active collaboration on the part of all our communities and recognizes that each county has the right - even the responsibility - to meet its own air travel needs, can we move forward with a future we can all live with in Southern California. Our point is a simple one: }Ve should develop the existing airports where we expect ottr new growth to be before we fitrther burden the residents of communities near LAX. ~P'e need the will and the mechanism to create a genuinely regional airportplan for Southern California, a plan that is safe, fair, prudent, and meets the needs of all the communities of Southern California. Southern California Population & Employment Growth Projections & Airport Availability An increasingly decentralized region is proposed to be served by an increasingly centralized airport system, exacerbating the region's already daunting congestion and air pollution problems. · The subregions of Southern California with the fastest growing populations are those most remote from LAX, each of which has underutilized airports they wish to develop. Subregion Airports Population 1994 2020 Increase % North LA County Palmdale 451.4 1,213.4 762.0 169% West. Riverside March 1,114.9 2,340.8 1,225.9 110% San Bernardino Norton 1,558.3 2,830.0 1,271.7 82% George Ontario Coachella Valley , Palm 262.0 475.2 213.2 81% Springs 3,386.6 6,859.4 3,472.8 102.5% The four fastest growing regions of Southern California have 6 under-utilized airports with commercial capacity. Their current combined population of nearly 3.4 million grows to over 6.8 million by the year 2020, a 100% increase. · The subregions with the greatest projected absolute increases in population are also remote from LAX and have six underutilized airports. · The exception is the city of Los Angeles itself. However, much of the City of Los Angeles, the San Fernando Valley for example, is actually quite remote from LAX. Subregion Airports Population 1994 2020 Increase % San Bernardino Norton 1,558.3 2,830.0 1,271.7 82% George Ontario Los Angeles City LAX 3,656.7 4,890.9 1,234.2 34% West. Riverside March 1,114.9 2,340.8 1,225.9 110% North LA County Pahndale 451.4 1,213.4 762.0 169% Orange County John Wayne 2,595. I 3,244.6 649.5 25% El Toro /70 · The three slowest growing subregions of Southern California are the subregions closest to LAX. Subregion Airports Population 1994 2020 Increase % Gateway Cities Long Beach 1,982. l 2,368.6 386.5 19% South Bay Cities 819.0 925.6 106.6 13% Westside Cities 227.0 253.0 26.0 11% The current combined 3 million population of these subregions is projected to grow approximately 17% to 3.5 million. The City of Los Angeles itself is projected to grow only by about 34%, much more slowly than the other pads of the region. /7/ · The six fastest growing subregions in Southern California, as measured in terms of rates of employment growth, are also those subregions most remote from LAX. · Each of these subregions has one or more underutilized airport it wishes to develop. Subregion Airports Employment 1994 2020 Increase % North LA County Palmdale 139.6 416.9 277.3 199% West. Riverside March 278.6 762.8 484.2 174% San Bernardino Norton 486.0 1,103.4 617.4 127% George Ontario Coachella Valley Palm 108.5 197.9 89.4 82% Springs Ventura County Point Mugu 282.5 485.5 203.0 72% Orange County John Wayne 1,262.4 2,116.6 854.2 68% El Toro · Even when looked at in terms of employment growth in absolute numbers, the majority of the subregions expected to experience the largest increase in employment are remote from LAX. · These subregions also have underutilized airports. Subregion Airports Employment 1994 2020 Increase % Orange County John Wayne 1,262.4 2,116.6 854.2 68% El Toro San Bernardino Norton 486.0 1,103.4 617.4 127% George Ontario Los Angeles City LAX 1,705.1 2,209.3 504.2 30% West. Riverside March 278.6 762.8 484.2 174% Gateway Cities Long Beach 795.2 1,110.3 315.1 40% North LA County Palmdale 139.6 416.9 277.3 199% · The communities closest to LAX will have the slowest rates of employment growth in the region. Subregion Airports Employment 1994 2020 Increase % Gateway Cities Long Beach 795.2 1,110.3 315.1 40% South Bay 408.9 554.5 145.6 36% Los Angeles City LAX 1,705.1 2,209.3 504.2 30% Westside Region 237.8 285.2 47.4 20% · In absolute numbers, several of the subregions closest to LAX are projected to produce the fewest jobs. Subregion Airports Employment 1994 2020 Increase % South Bay 408.9 554.5 145.6 36% Arroyo Verdugo Burbank 277.8 410.2 132.4 48% Coachella Valley Palm Springs 108.5 197.9 89.4 82% Westside Region 237.8 285.2 47.4 20% 17q The proposed expansion of LAX. Is it Safe? Is it Fair? Is it Prudent? And, Is it Necessary? Is it Safe? · It will significantly increase the air traffic congestion in the Los Angeles area. · It will significantly increase traffic congestion and air pollution in communities around LAX. It will more than double diesel truck traffic around the airport. · It will increase air pollution from both planes and vehicles (particularly diesel trucks) in Los Angeles and surrounding cities. · It will likely cause adverse health impacts, particularly for children and seniors. Is it Fair? · It will concentrate the hardships of congestion, air pollution and noise in communities near LAX, yet it. will not proportionally benefit those communities. It will disproportionately burden low income neighborhoods under the flight path and in their communities where traffic will increase. · Each county should meet its own air travel needs, and bear its own burdens to the extent possible. LAX neighbors should not bear every other county's burdens related to air travel. · The proposed expansion at LAX will undermine the ability of airports closest to the new population growth centers to expand to accommodate their own air travelers. Is it Prudent? · The $12 billion price tag makes the LAX expansion one of the most expensive airport projects ever. Denver's controversial airport only cost $4.2 billion (twice what it was originally projected to cost). · The City of Los Angeles should have learned from LA DWP, LA City Hall and MTA's excessive debt and cost overrun problems. Do we really need another $8-12 billion dollar mismanaged budget? · Bonds to finance such an investment may be very risky, relying on projections of air traffic growth over 25 years or more. The City of Los Angeles should have learned from LADWP's problems that predicting the next twenty-five years is dicey. ·The proposed expansion at LAX is the least cost effective airport investment in Southern California. On a per-MAP basis, LAX will be 5-7 times more expensive than El Toro. · New job projections are not exclusively dependent upon increasing capacity at LAX, but rather will result from comparable increased airport capacity elsewhere in the region. Is it Necessary? · We don't have to concentrate all commercial aircraft activity at LAX. There are eleven other regional airports which can be developed to absorb some of the air traffic growth. ·These other airports are in the areas of the greatest population and job growth. LAX is in the areas of the least population and job growth. ·Many of these other regional airports are actively supported by their communities, often with little or no local opposition. They primarily need access to regional capital to fulfill the role. · Perceived congestion and inefficiencies at LAX can be handled through upgrades to existing baggage, concession, terminal and transit operations. /7,5 22 Frequently Asked Questions about LAX and Regional Airports 1. How much expansion does LAX want? · LAX currently services approximately 60 Million passengers per year (MAP) and 1.8 milion tons of cargo per year. They propose to expand their capacity to service 98 million passengers per year and 4.8 million tons of cargo. (98 Map represents about 2/3 of the regional air passenger activity.) Currently, LAX handles 2000 flights per day; if they expand as proposed they will handle nearly 3,000 flights per day. · This is an enormous increase with profound implications for the rest of the "LAX Impact Zone. (These projections need to be treated with some degree of skepticism. The current configuration of the airport, when the last Master Plan was approved, was supposed to be capable of handling 40 million passengers per year; they . exceed that now by a factor of 50%.i 2. Why is the City of El Segundo opposed to the expansion of LAX? · We think that. t~e proposed expansion of LAX is the wrong answer to the right question. How should Southern California capture the growing opportunity in air commerce in the 2lst Century? We believe that the best way to answer this question is by developing a regional plan to better use the eleven other commercial airports in Southern California, many of which operate in the areas of Southern California expected to have the highest growth. · We also believe that the concerns of the South Bay and Westside Cities are su'aightforward and reasonable. The proposed expansion of LAX will mean dramatically worsening traffic congestion (especially in light of other new development proposed for the region), far greater air pollution, more excessive airport noise, and increasing air safety risks. · Concentrating our airport facilities at LAX remote from where the greatest new growth in population and jobs will occur only assures unnecessary congestion. The SCAG Drat~ R. TP makes it clear that the region faces absolutely daunting congestion problems over the next twenty years. In the time frame of the expansion plan stretches of the 1-405 near LAX are expected to have its average congested speed reduced from a current 16-23 mph to 10-16 mph. It makes no sense to exacerbated this congestion by concentrating our air traffic at LAX when the growth in the region is in the Inland Empire and North Los Angeles and Orange Counties. · It will significantly increase air pollution and traffic congestion in communities around LAX. In addition to doubling automobile traffic, expanding LAX as proposed may more than double diesel truck traffic around the airport. LAX is already the region's single largest source of N0x emission, greater than the next three largest sources combined; 3 ~ times the pollution generated by all MTA buses. LAX $,278 Mobil Oil Corp 2,731 Chewon USA 1,921 MTA 1,792 AR. CO 1,712 The California Air Resources Board has detcra~ined that diesel exhaust particulates are a toxic air contaminant, responsible for thousands of cases of lung cancer among Californians. Air pollution in the LA region has already been associated with diminishing the lung capacity of youth by as much as 15%. · Expanding LAX as proposed will dramatically increase the noise burdens on surrounding communities. For El Segundo this noise comes mostly from "fly arounds" which will increase substantially as the air space becomes more crowded. · Expanding LAX as proposed will nearly double the air traffic in corridors serving the already crowded LAX air space. Overcrowding in our air corridors reduces the margin of error in the air traffic system and increases the likelihood of air disasters. 3. You say that expanding LA~X isn't safe, isn't fair, isn't prudent, and isn't necessary. What do you mean? Is it safe? El Segundo believes there are very significant concerns about air safety, congestion, air pollution and other environmental impacts that compromise the safety and public health of our community and other communities. Is it fair? E1 Segundo believes that a disproportionate share of these burdens are born by a small number of communities in the LAX "impact zone." In addition to E1 segundo and other South Bay communities, these impacts are born by many low-income and disadvantaged communities under the flight path of the airport. Further, the proposed expansion of LAX will unfairly deny other communities in the region a full opportunity to develop their own airport and economic resources. Is it prudent? . El Segundo has concerns over the excessive costs of the proposed expansion of LAX. Other airport resources in the region can be developed at a far lower cost, .4ince they will not requires building new or "moving" runways as does LAX. Is it necessary? E1 Segundo believes the capacity exists for capturing the anticipated growth in regional air traffic at the multiple airports in Southern California that are suitable for commercial airport use. Properly using theses airport resources, located in the high growth regions of Southern California, will make it unnecessary to expand LAX. 4. Assuming the increased environmental burdens you suggest, isn't the contribution to the local and regional economy too great to pass up? · Not when these burdens can be largely avoided by utiIizing airport resources closer to where the new markets for air traffic will be developing, in the high growth regions of Southern California. 5. El Segundo isn't under the takeoff or landing flight paths. Why is it so concerned about LAX? · The burdens of airport noise do not occur solely for communities under the flight path. For El Segundo, our primary noise problem is a result of"fly arounds" made while air craR are queuing for landing. Nevertheless, there is a very significant noise problem associated with takeoffs for El Segundo, especially for neighborhoods closer to the airport. · In addition, the impacts of congestion and air pollution will be very severe for E1 Segundo. 6. Isn't this just a case of middle class NIMBYism? Won't communities elsewhere in the region experience lots of jobs benefits? · No. These environmental burdens are both excessive and unnecessary. It is simply good sense to use the regional resources that yield the least burdens, as well as the fairest distribution of benefits and burdens. 7. El Segundo is tallring to other communities to gain their support. Flow is this effort going? · Very well. As of today ].2 communities have joined us and adopted a version of our resolution calling for a regional airport plan and limiting growth at LAX. Those communities are E1 Segundo, Culver City, Santa Monica, Lawndale, Redondo Beach, Gardena, Palos Verdes Estates, Inglewood, Hermosa Beach, Lomita, Hawthorne and Manhattan Beach. Los Angeles County has laso approved a resolution calling for a regional airport plan rather than expanding LAX. 8. Isn't some expansion of LAX justified.'? Do you oppose any expansion whatever? · LAX officials have said, in the context of the SCAG Aviation Subcommittee, that they would expect to grow to 70 million passengers per year if they were constrained to existing facilities. So, even if the Master Plan is not /77 approved as proposed, they would likely grow. Residents of my community would not be happy with that, but if we chose to oppose this growth we would have to do so through the FAA, since it is independent of the Master Plan which we are now opposing. 9. Isn't the expansion of LAX necessary if we are to have a competitive economy in the 21" century? · A good case can be made that capturing all or a significant share ofthe potential growth in air commerce is important to the regional economy. However, we believe that this growth can and should be captured by making better use of the eleven other commercial airports in Southern California, rather than by expanding LAX. · We believe that utilizing these other regional airports would be far less environmentally impactful, would produce far less congestion, would cost far less, and would provide a much fairer distribution of burdens and benefits. 10. What makes you think that the.development of a regional airport plan is possible? · Most of the eleven other commercial airports in Southern California are poised for significant growth and development. Many operate in communities expected to experience dramatic growth over the next two decades, growth that will assure a strong market for local airport services. These airports have built appropriate local management' capability and are marketing themselves to airline operators. All have existing runway systems and can avoid the enormous expense that expanding LAX would entail. · Many of these airports are in the high growth areas of Southern California and would service a local market without requiring long trips to distant airports. In addition to LAX, Ontario and E1 Toro are appropriate candidates to serve as international and regional hubs. Other airports would serve primarily point to point travel. Some airports, such as March Airport in Riverside, are likely to be primarily cargo airports. · Consistently these airports hear the same refrain from potential operators: the operators want to see what will happen with the proposed expansion of LAX. As long as LAX is potentially expanding, the opportunities for other regional airports is limited. 11. Won't these other airports just get tied up by local political opposition? · Some airports have a history of local political resistance, especially those in built out urban environments, like LAX, Long Beach, Burbank, and John Wayne. However, airports in the less built out areas, like the Inland Empire, can operate with little impact on residential areas. These communities can plan their airports and their' overall development to avoid future collisions with neighbors. As a result, these airports now experience strong local community support. They are seen by their communities as opportunities for economic development and a chance to become full partners in the regional economy. 12. The majority of the population and employment growth in the region is expected to occur in the Inland Empire and North Los Angeles County over the next twenty years. However, LAX officials say that the population with the "high propensity to fly" will grow mostly near LAX, and thus the proposed expansion is justified. How do you respond? (Jack Driscoll at LAX says that 50% of all origins and destinations in Southern California are centered in about 6% of the land area which is all within a 20 mile radius of LAX.) · We treat this claim with a great deal ofskepticism. In the first instance, we are aware of no publicly available information to support it. If such information were available we would want to have the opportunity to examine and critique it. · What we do know is that the primary market of LAX (20 mile radius) will experience about one-fourth of Southern California's population and job growth, yet LAX proposes to capture more than hal t~ the new growth in regional air commerce. · By contrast, the airports in the subregions of the Inland Empire and North Los Angles County will experience more than half of the region's population and job growth, yet, based on the SCAG adopted RTP, will capture only 15% of the new growth in regional air commerce. (Not coincidentally, most of that new air commerce will be captured at Ontario Airport, an airport also owned by the City of Los Angeles.) · For this outcome to be true would require the average person in each new job in the LAX primary market to fly XX times per year, an incredible rate. By contrast, the average person in a new job in the Inland Empire or North LA County would fly only 5½ flights per year. 13. Can a regional plan force communities like Long Beach to accept greater levels of air traffic at their airports than they wish to? · We would never support such a plan. Rather, we propose a plan that would constrain some airports for environmental and fairness reasons, while creating opportunity for other airports that want to grow and where there is community support to grow by assuring that regional dollars can go to those airports to facilitate the development of facilities and infi-astmcture. 14. Some say that Palmdale Airport is the major alternative to expanding LAX. Others say Palmdale Airport simply cannot meet the needs of the 21" Century. What do you think about Palmdale Airport as an alternative? · Palmdale Airport has an important role to play meeting the needs of a growing population and a growing economy in the North Los Angeles County and North San Fernando Valley region. However, Palmdale Airport is likely to play a role comparable to that played by Burbank Airport now. It can be a contributor in an overall system, but not the major alternative to LAX. 15. LAX officials say they are ready to support a regional plan that would include new airports at El Toro, expanding Ontario Airport, and perhaps building out Palmdale Airport. Nevertheless, they say, expanding LAX as proposed will be necessary. What do you say? · Officials at LAX tend to reduce a regional plan to those airports they own and, recently, El Toro. Yet, there are eight other commercial airports in the region. We see no reason to deny these other regional airports a role in the air commerce marketplace and the communities they serve the economic opportunity they might derive. Rather, were we to responsibly distribute the air traffic in the region, expansion of LAX would be unnecessary. · During the recent debate over the Regional Transportation Plan, the SCAG Aviation Subcommittee asked its staff to do a run of the computer model that SCAG employs which assumed that LAX were constrained to its existing facilities. How would air traffic be distr/buted in the region? Under that scenario, LAX officials said the their airport would likely increase its activity to 70 million passengers per year, a nearly 20% growth. The rest of the projected growth in air travel demand was then distributed by the model to other airports in the region. The aggregate demand approximated the medium level projections, indicating little or no loss of air commerce outside the region. 16. There is strong opposition to El Toro Airport in Orange County. If El Toro is blocked, won't it be necessary to expand LAX? · In fact El Toro Airport has been approved by the Orange County Board of Supervisors three times and by Orange County voters twice. LAX has had no similar show of support. However, if El Toro is not built, it will mean little for the approval of LAX. Opposition to El Toro is no more committed and no more vigorous than opposition to the expansion of LAX. We see no reason why communities around LAX should bear the burden of Orange County air travel if Orange County itself is unwilling to bear that burden. 17. What is the role of SCAG and the RTP in all of this? · SCAG plays a very important role. Federal law has designated SCAG as the entity which must approve a Regional Transportation Plan. The RTP identifies projects eligible for federal dollars. If LAX is constrained in the RTP, it will be difficult for a larger project to be financed. In addition, the SCAG Regional Council vote on the RTP is the closest thing we now have to a reg/onal vote on LAX or a regional airport plan. 18. LAX proponents say that air eargo is carried primarily in the belly of passenger air craft rather than on eargo only air carriers. They say that the region's cargo facilities should therefore be located near to the centers of passenger activity, rather than in single purpose airports in the Inland Empire? How do you respond? // 7q * It is true that a majority of air cargo is now carried in passenger air craft. Certainly the passenger airline industry would prefer to retain that role and would prefer that policy makers simply accept their continued dominance in air cargo commerce. Nevertheless, in the view of many, crowded conditions and congestion at passenger serving airports increasingly inhibits the efficiency of this industry. SCAG has produced a recent study which indicates that the direction of the air cargo industry is increasingly toward dedicated cargo aircraR. If so, the proposed use of airports such as March and others as primarily cargo airports may work very well in the air commerce marketplace of the 21st century. 19. Recently, LAX officials unveiled a third alternative plan for the expansion of LAX. They say that it is intended to address concerns from airport neighbors, especially El Segundo. Is this a satisfactory solution for El Segundo.'? · We appreciate the efforts that have been made to address our concerns. We believe the efforts were honest and well intentioned. However, the scale o[ the proposed expansion of LAX is such that efforts at mitigation, such as those embodied in the proposed alternative, are destined to be inadequate. We do not believe that it is possible to increase the level of activity at LAX as is proposed without serious, even dramatic, impacts on neighbors such as ourselves. That is why we urge the region to develop a regional plan to take advantage of other airport-resources, especially those in the high growth areas of Southern California: 20. If the City Council of Los Angeles decides that it is going to go ahead and expand the airport · Should that occur the City of E1 Segundowill pursue all its legal remedies. We believe other cities will join us as well. 21. How do you expect to win in your effort to propose a regional airport plan that constrains LAX and utilizes other airports? · We believe that a regional coalition ofcommunities and constituencies can be built among those who expect to be burdened by the proposed expansion, those who have airports they want to develop, and those who are simply fair minded. Such a coalition would be difficult for the City of Los Angeles to ignore. We believe that the members of the City Council of Los Angeles are responsible people, concerned about the environment, and concerned about fairness to their neighbors. We believe that a majority of that body will prefer to be a regional leader among partners rather than isolated from its neighboring communities. Collaboration is the prudent course, and in the end the course that will most benefit Los Angeles. 22. Is there reason to believe that the airlines are interested in utilizing other regional airports? · So long as the proposed expansion of LAX is on the table, we expect the airlines to express reluctance to consider other airports, especially the five largest carriers who are accustomed to operating out of centralized hubs. However, were LAX constrained too the capacity of its existing facilities, we expect that the airlines will follow the market to these other regional airports in the high growth areas of Southern California. They are experienced businesses; they will not want their competitors to gain a foothold in these airports uncontested. May 14, 1998 South Bay cities uniting against expansion of LAX · Opposition to plans to enlarge clt~ official~ munchng what is ~-ead¥ the nation's fourth- John Gaines, busiest the international airport bring Jo~n $one~ local o/ficials would hire to see other air* surrounding cities together for nob Pinzler, port~ throughout the region -- mdudmg - Linda WII- Ontario and Butb,mk -- expanded. and for rare display of unity. ,o,,. ~. th, Lo, Ange~e, C~ty Coun~ to t~ke ~ doer Reviaky and look at building a new auport on city-owned I~,m Bo~ Larry Guld. l pmper~y in Palmdale. 'The proposed ex'pan~on ot LAX could ~ ~ oppose dramatically change the desuabihty o! living Opposition to the proposed S8 billion expansion. Ln L~e South Bay,' Pmz.ler sa~cL 'And it's not just a quality-o~-Iife issue, but a property- expansion of Los Angeles [nterna~onal 'Our commtmi~y will ultimately be the value L~sue and a business issue because a ALrport ~s ~xeatmg a new era o~ cooperation mo~t impacted.' Gordon said. 'But what gridlocked aLrpon wLll hurt our ability to between South Bay dtie~, which o~en a~e at we're ~ytng ~o do is t~crea.se the input U~at a11~act businesses. ° odds over other ~'ampoztal~on issues. [an South Bay dtte~] have on th~ issue.' - blanha~an Beach City Councilwoman What began as a grazs-rooL~ E! Segundo- One o! the biggest [eats o! South Bay res- Joaa Jones encoreages South Bay c~es to based effort to fight the LAX expao~on has tden~ and business owners iz lower prope~y continue ~o work together against the pro- blossomed to incrude all o~ the beach cries values caused by the additional a~plane posaL and neighbors to ~he eazL ~dud~ng Torrance, noise and a~' pollution, Redondo Beach '[Such concerns] are pulling us toge~er Gardena, Lawndale, Hawthorne and others. Councilman Bob Ptnzler saicL Another is tra/- E] Segundo Mayor Mike Gordon said. tic gridlock on highways and side streets sur- SEE LAX PAGE ~ A plane takes off from LAX near !/le proposed exPal~°n 'lie. El Segundo vows all-out fight with airport Consultant with council ~,=, of the ammunition leveled by eiallyforehtldrenand seniort~ port expands and becomes more eefic,ent. meets , Zane against LAX expansion has been e"LAX neighbors should not bear ev- 'If there are Some impacts. it's our plans tough anti expansio fight truml~tedbygrass.rootsgroupsandoth. ery other eounty's burdens relat~ tO air responsibility to mitigate them." Dr~--ol! - [eI er politicians: alleged increases in air traveL" said, 'If we can't entertain impmvemtmts and noise poUution, traffic congestion · The four fastest-growing areas in the ... it's just going to g~t worse .... We By Jim Radcliffe Tuesday's council meeting. Zane said the and potential for air disasters, community have SfLX airports that are intend to be a good neighbor,' $x*~r wm~ city will lobby decision.makers to spread $tlU. El Segundo has become the most under-utLlized: Palmdale. Ontario, Palm around the rort~msted increase in pas~n. organized and best-armed foe or LAX ex- Springs and March, Norton. and George I_4,X officials have propoc, od spending A consultant hired by El Segundo to get and cargo flights among more than a pansion. with $12 million already set Air Force bases. $8 billion ~o $12 billion to refurbish LAX help derail the proposal to greatly ex- dozen airports in the region. aside ~o pay ["or the sen-ices of Gladstein · The Metropolitan Transportation so it can handle at leas~ 92 million pas- pand Los Angeles International Airport He said the other facilities that could & Associates and San l:'rancLsco lawyer Authority spends millions or dollars sengets annually by 2915. up loom the has unveiled some of his plans and said absorb additional /lights Include the Clement F~ $hule Jr. helping people get to their jobs. Why not current 60 million. Cargo would more that a fight will be waged not only to Palmdale Regional Airport. the proposed Shute did not speak at the public hear. put the jobs where they live? than double. make noise, but to win. El Toro airport in Orange County and trig. because the cid' doesn't want LAX to · There are other politicians besides While supporters say expansion woutd "There is no reason that LAX and the mUitary installations that could be COn. know its legal strategies. members of the Los Angeles City Council mean more jobs and an economic boost area surrounding it should bear all of the verted to public use. 'It's not easy to play poker hr you are '*'ho could halt expansion: state and fed, to the region. critics argue that the re burden," said Dennis Zane. senior vice El Segundo will strive to form a coall. showing all of your cards straight up." eral lawmakers, who may end up voting gion's other airports should sham lthe president with Gladstein & As.s4~iates in tion that will include South Bay cities Mayor .Mike Gordon said. for part of the tundiag, burdens and benefits of increased flights. Santa Monica, "Protest matters. but we opposed to LAX expansion as weU as The COnsultant also said: John DrtscolL LAX's executive direc~ Even if LAX expands. other airports, want to win." those like Palmdale that want their air. II Expansion could increase pollution for. said air and noise poilulion and tr-d- must enlarge to handle the increase in In a 30-minute presentation during fields to take on more flights. and cause ".adverse health impacts. espe- 11c congestion might decrease if the air- demand. the proexpansion camp adds. El Segundo again denounces LAX expansion ,~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ .~ ~ El Segundo "' '-- ---' ~ ~ ~l ~ bu ~ aim M ~ ~andlnt~m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ht~ IhJ~lly~ln~o~ 'tl~ ~ ~ ~'s ~ I~ ~ s~~~ the ~ -- ~B I~ ~. ~m w~ ~ n~ ~g to ~ the ~l ~. handed h7 ~lh~ allpotts ~ ~e~p~ ~ fi~ ~lhl ~ wh~ ~ ~ t~ ~b ~ ~l ~t ~r Air F~ M U~ M~ in ~ CRy ~I ~ ~ ~ I~ hl~t ~t~ ~ ~, I~W ~ ~ ~ !mU t~u 3uys. METRO TUESDAY ^UGUST 4. 199S Supervisors Seek a Voice To clare. aemmons aoout expan- sion or development of airports in LAX Plans part by the cities in which they ai'e: located without eonsideratiori~ ,~' control over airports in other citl~ By SHARON BERNSTEIN or in unincorporated areas. TIMES STAFF WRITER That means Los Angeles has been left to decide on its own what Saying that the proposed expan- kind of facilities to build, typically sion of Los Angeles International doing so without input from or Airport is "troubling." the county regard for other municipalities. Board of Supervisors on Tuesday To begin addressing that prob- demanded a voice in the city's leto. the supervisorsdecided Tues- plans to enlarge the overcrowded day to set up a countywide task facility. force. The board also urged the city to But that would still not bind any develop a regional approach to city to participate in a regionalplan anticipated growth in air traffic and it would not involve repre- that would siphon some activity senretires of nearby counties. such from LAX to smaller airports. as Orange County, that might Iogi- "L.A. city has turned a deaf ear tally be included in one. on the other 87 cities in L.A. "You can set up task forces until County about this." alleged county the cows come home," said Los Supervisor Mike Antonovich, who Angeles City Councilwoman Ruth had asked the board to go even Gelenter, who represents the area further and place a measure on the around LAX and opposes the cur- November ballot requiring that rent expansion plan. "The question regional airports be included in any is who is going to build what at expansion of LAX. their airports." The board declined to go that far, Gelenter. who testified Tuesday but the supervisors voted unani- ~ In favor of Antonovtch'a plan for a mously to oppose any expansion r, referendum, nonetheless wel- plan that includes only LAX itself. coined the supervisors' entrance "They've got to bring us to the into the discussion. table," said Supervisor Don Knabe, Los Angeles Mayor Richard whose district includes the airport RioTdan, a staunch supporter of and small nearby cities and who LAX expansion, welcomed input introduced the motion to call for a from the county's task force but. regional plan. "If not, I'm ready to would not comment on whether oppose this whole thing." the county would be included in the city's panel overseeing the A regional approach, Knabe said, proposal, said his spokeswoman, would include expanding not only Noelia Rodriguez. Ontario and Palmdale airports, Rodriguez stressed that the which are owned by Los Angeles. mayor's vision includes increasing but perhaps Long Beach or a future traffic at Ontario and Palmdale airport at El Toro, in Orange airports. County, as well. "LAX would be a key player, but But such ideas run smack up against a systemic problem likely i it wouldn't be the only player in the new system," Rodriguez said.* to stymie efforts for a broad-rang- ~ "The bottom line is that for Los ing plan: There is no regional Angeles to remain competitive in regulatory bodywithresponsibility the 21st century. LAX has to for developing appropriate air traf- expand. But so do other airports in fie. the reftion." LOCAL NEWS / WEATHER/LOTrERY SECTION METRo , SUNDAY AUOus'r ~. ~998 CCt '~0~ LOS ANGELES TIMES ~' 1' * SUND:\Y. AUGUST 9. 1998 B~ METRO NEWS Size Matters for LAX Expansion Foes · Airport: Inglewood's first tOWll Proponents of the expansion plan argue that the Los Angeles airport needs to grow for the region's meeting on the issue offers a blueprint for economic good. Los Angeles is in competition w~ti~ rallying opposition to the proposal. other West Coast cities for trade and travelers, they say, and a big airport is needed to keep up. By PATRICK KERKSI'RA No one, not even the die-hard LAX expansmn TI~4ES ~I'AFF WRITER opponents on hand Saturday. disputed the need for i more passenger and cargo facilities. · nglewood's first town meeting on Los Angeles But opponents insist that the expansion take place at International Airport's expansion got off to a late other places, such as Palmdale. in.the far northern start Saturday. People complained that they were reaches ofLosAngelesCounty. delayed by the traffic on the San Diego Freeway. "I hardly think this is a NIMBY [not in my back Probably because there were too many people going yard] sort of reaction." said El Segundo resident Joan to LAX, cracked the first speaker. Hardy. "Look at all the noise and pollution we already It. was an appropriate beginning to a meeting put up with. I'd say we've been pretty game. We just dedicated to easing the airport's impact on sur- don't want it to get any worse." rounding communities. The several hundred at the Saturday's town meeting was not the sort of session were mostly residents. eager to learn what gathering concerned with an evenhandeddebate. they could do to prevent the airport and its accompa- Rather, it was a workshop in teaching residents how nying traffic, noise and pollution from growing even to apply political pressure. bigger. "The vote to approve the expansion will be taken "Planes roar over my house every two minutes or so first by the Airport Commission. which is appointed by as is," said Manhattan Beach resident Lorenzo Diez. "I the mayor." LOs Angeles City Councilwoman Ruth can't even comprehend how the)' would think about Galanter. a leading foe of expansion. explained to the making it bigger." crowd. But plans to do that are underway. The LAX But then. the decision moves to the City Council. expansion plan, embraced by Mayor Richard Riotdan. And all those members "read the papers. watch TV airlines an'd most city business interests. calls for and read letters." Galanter said. doubling the facility's passenger capacity by 2020 She urged the crowd to crank up the heat on her while tripling its cargo-handling abilities. counterparts. LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOURNAL MARCH 23, 1998 LAX Turbulence"" FUROR OVER AIRPORT EXPANSION PLAN GROWS BY LARRY KANTER ~pposing (he alrpon's §row(h ptan:~. Senior Repor~r Already. Hardi.~n s~id, the skies above the Sea(h Bay a re increasing- T~E battle lines are haxdenin.gly noisy wi(h jet traffic and local in tile fighl over LAX's,amN- surface $1r¢¢ta are crowded'with (ious "rnas~er plan' for trucks and flayclefs headed 10 'nnd expansion, from LAX. With ~c ai;pod ptan- Wha~ cmce was a neight~orhood ning to incr,:ale iis capacity annual- scuffle between local I:msiness inter-ly from 60 million to rteazly ests and We~de homeowner:; and mJl.tion passenger~ o~,er th.e'riex~ environmen~.alisax N fa$1 becomingtwo decade.$, Hardiso. and her a full-scale, reg?ona[ brawl. peet= fear Iha~ congestion will only Concerns over the efteels o( Lo~grow worse. "Whe~ are ~e benefits Dr Angele~ lnternalionai A~tpot~'s megy. billiou-dollar maszer p{an am · ske ~k~. on ~e agendas of To.once, Redon- gac~x of ~X's expausi6n say do 0each and Long Beach - and such ~nefil= ~ 0bviou~-jo~s ~nd ecoaemir growth. Expansion gamering scrutiny as far afield as Catabaxas and Palmdale. airporl, they argue. would add "We see mos~ of ~e vu~ue of lhe367,~ jo~ and $37 bitlieu'a y~ar expansion going Io the city of LA.in additional activity to the and ~osl of the headaches - theeconomy. noise, ~e traffic, the pollution -."T~e Soulh Bay woul~.'be coming Io ~e oiher cities." said Deedeep trouble if il were not f~t Ihe Hatalison, mayor of Torrance andai~orl," said John ]. Dfiscu{~, chair of ~he Sou~h Bay Cities Coun-u¢ive dl~tor of Los Angele~.~odd oil of Oo~cmmenl~, a conso~ium ofAirporls. '"Half Ihe buildings' are 16 municipalities that recentlyfilled wi{~ ai~o~-~ialed ; - Growing pains hit LAX, 405 Expansion to put more cars on road By Eric Moses Dail)' News Staff Even on a good day, the San Diego Freeway is so clogged that getting to a flight on time at Los Angeles International Airport is a gamble. Traffic is so bad that airlines say some pas- sengem blame the congestion for missed flights. But now LAX wants to add runways and ter- minals, pushing 40 million more passengers per year through its gates by 2015 ~ almost doubling airport traffic along the key freeway from the San Fernando Valley. LAX officials insist they have a plan to take care of the extra traffic. But opponents are leery about whether the plan will work and are even more skeptical that money is available. They say Los Angeles should focus on expanding the city-owned Palmdale Airport and building a bullet train to it, because the trip to LAX is bound to become more difficult, if not impossible. "If you live in the San Fernando Valley and traffic in the Scpulveda Pass is backed up, you can go to Palmdale. It's t~rther, but it's faster," said Councilwoman Ruth Galantcr, who supports enlarging the Antelope Valley airstrip as an alternative to LAX expansion in her district. See TRAFFIC Page 12 DAILY NEWS / SUNDAY, APRIL 5, 1998 / NEWS Missed flights Traffic also is a reason why many people miss flights leaving LAX or have to sprint through the terminal to make the gate. On a recent Friday night, attorney Todd Chapman ran up to a Conti- could help cut congestion. nental Airlines gate at LAX five whether it is sufficient, we will haYel minutes late for his flight to San Francisco. He said traffic was so bad to see," he said. - Airport engineers still are dis-~ on theHarborand 105 freewaysthat cussing the plans with state trans-. h.e never thou.ght he would get to the perration officials, and details could', a~rport on Ume. Fortunately for bereleasedinApfilorMay, DepoianI Chapman, the plane was still there. said. "I give myself an hour and 15 Most of the expansion pro.~ec? minutes to get here from would be paid for by the airlines, downtown," Chapman said as he the state and federal governments; stood in line to check in. would have to join with LAX to phy. Asked if that was a sufficient for the road and transit work,. amountoftime, he replied, "Often, Depoian said. Other possible it's not." Then he walked into a bar l~rabeerafterlearninghisfligfitwas sources include the Metropolitan. Transportation Authority, the city delayed at least two hours due to a Transportation Department and the, mechanical problem. Southern Calilbrnia Association of Most airlines do not keep records Governments. of why passengers show up late, but officials say backed-up streets and fleeways are a common excuse. Traffic experts weigh in "It's not necessarily an everyday The governments association, experience, but our employees who looking at the regional issues, has work out at the gate area say cus- endorsed adding a lane in each tomers do mention the traffic as a direction on the 405 between Rose- reason why they are late to a flight or crans and the 10[. Car-pool and as a reason why they missed a '* M~:haelOweo{~lk,r/DmlyNew$ regular lanes are planned within llight," Southwest Airlines spokes- woman Kitsten Kendrick said. . A sea of brake lights on the southbound 405 Freeway in West Los seven years. According to an airport study, Angeles illustrates the congestion problem. Last week, Pinzlcr, the expansion opponent from Redondo Beach who D\X-bound motorists heading south on the 405 accounted for Congestion-busting mini-freeway, with entrance and is a member of SCAG's aviation about 4 percent of traffic in the Thccorncrstoncofthetrafficplan exit ramps at points not yet deter- subcommittee, persuaded his col- Scpulveda Pass. That figure rises to to deal with the anticipated annual mined, Dcpoian said. leagueson the panel to pass a motion 7 percent at La Tijcra Boulevard passenger increase from 60 million Other projects under consider- opposing new construction at D\X. The association staff supports the and 10 percent at Century today to 100 million in 17 years is ationare: Boulevard. the beltway, or road encircling the · More car-pool and regular expansion. · South of LAX, airport traffic on ' 3,500-acre property. traffic lanes on the 405. The Transportation and Com- munications Committee is expected the northbound 405 accounts for Officials say it would route cars,, · An elevated car-pool lane over to vote on the measure Thursday, 16 percent of the traffic at Rose- vans and cabs to new and existing Century Boulevard for direct access and the full SCAG board will debate crans Boulevard and 10 percent at terminals and take traffic off local to LAX from the 405. the issue April 16. Century Boulevard. streets. [] Modification of the 105 Pinzlerdoesn't believe the traffic During rush hour on a typical "The only reason you'd want to be Freeway's Imperial Boulevard exit situation can be resolved enough to afternoon, 18,229 motorists use the on it is if you're goingto the airport," to separate airport traffic from other allow an expansion. He said now it 405 between Century and LaTijera said Phil Depbian, the airport's vehicles. takes 30 to 35 minutes to go from boulevards, of which 573 are going assistant executive director. · A new airport exit on the 405 at Artcsia Boulevard to the airport via to or from LAX. By 2020, the Preliminary designs show the Arbor Vitae Street, just north of Scpulveda when it should take 10to number could rise to 23,176, with road involving Westchester Park- Century Boulevard. Arbor Vitac 15minutes. With the cxpansion and LAX accounting for 1,457 vehicle way on the north, Pershing Drivc on runs into Westchester Parkway, only some road improvements, trips. the west, Imperial Boulevard and which is part of the proposed ring Pinzlcr fears that ride could take 45 On the 405 south of the 105 the105 on thc south, and thc 405 on road. minutes. Freeway, thereare21,093 motorists the east. Alterations to that~ · Extension of the Green Line "It's going to make it so that the' during peak hours on a typical day, including a shortcut near or light rail onto airport property. only way you are going to be able to ofwhich 2,545 are tied to I.,,kX. And including Scpulvcda Boulevard, arc Tim Merwin. an aviation expert move a car is with a crane -- pick it by 2020, the numbercould jump to possible. , tbr the Southern Calit~rnia Assoct- up and move it out of the road," hc 25,643, of which 4,075 are Connectors would be erected to ation of Governments, ~id the said. D\X-related. link the existing roads into a L,XX plans lbrroad improvements[ June 22, 1998 UP FRONT LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOURNAL 5 LAX Expansion Fight Heats Up With Ads, New Option BY IIOWARD FINE Stall Reporter In a bid to appease critics of the ma.~.~ive Los Angeles International Airport expansion pro- Besides adding a ranway. the new option {a~ jeer, LAX officials are preparing to intrrxluce a well a,~ the other two pre-existing ones) calls fi~r "third option" later this summer. And the DOW- rec~mligunng Ihc existing ranways Io facilitalc efful business-labor coalition backing the air- greater pl;me I~uflic. 'the first two options - and port expansion has stepped up its campaign for mo~t likely the new one - also wtmld involve the project, appearing at a City Hall heating last building a new n,tl ringing the aiq~ort. a new week and launching an ad campaign. entrance on lhe western side. a new terminal Even so. expansion opponents say they have f;~'ility and more cargo-handling facilities. the means and the will to tie up the $8 billion- "This option came out of discussions we to-$12 billion project for years, with legal chal- have h,'vJ with various agencies and comnmnitv lenges if necess, ary. gmup~ over the past year." Dd~.coll mid. If the glacial progres.~ of the heavily litigated The third option. he said. won't be full',' Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport expansion unveiled until the Fxxleral Aviation Administta- is any indication, that strategy could prove a lion completes its computer simulations thai test succe.s,qful delaying tactic. the ability of the ranway configuration to han- LAX expansion has garnered opposition (lie projected increams in takeoffs and landings. from several South Bay cities and L.A.-City as well as satisfy safety concerns. The FAA is Councilwoman Ruth Galantcr. whose council expected to take anolher four to eight weeks to district encompasses the airport and surround- ,,,,'rap up the simulations. ing communities. The third option hears some remmblance to "I don't think anyone should underestimate the first in that both call for a total of five ran- our resolve to ~e this through to the end. using ways. 3hc .~2cond option calls for six runways. whatever means neeessay'," said El Segundo three on the north side and three on the south. [layor [,like Gordon. "We've spent $1.1 million All three options would expand the capacity ~ far on this, which is a big commitment for a of the airport from the current 60 million pas- city with a $.30 million genen~l fund budget." rangers a yc~ to 98 million p~,;mngers a year Airport officials hope to blunt the opposition and allow up to three times the current cargo of El Segundo and surrounding cities by intm- load to pas.q through the airport. ducing a "third o~tion" into the mix. This would Meanwhile, airport supporters flexed their ,,involve building a third runway on the south muscle la.qt week, two months after forming a side of the airport (which currently ha.~ two east- business-labor coalition known as LAX 2 I. west runway~ on the n(mh side and two on the named for its support for expanding LAX for south side), according to John Dripoil. execu- the 21st century. Several labor repre~ntatives live director of the Department of Airports. MONDAY. APRIL 15. 1996 Commentary .Consider the" Neighbors, Not About 25,000 homes and nearly 70,000 Just the Economy · noise levels that exceed Calltans reguta. tiens. This is an unacceptable number ot~ ~ LIX: Plans for growth have to residents who on a daily basis bear the brunt of LAX.generated noise pollution, take account of the impact on yet little progress has been made to brtng people living nearby. these homes into compliance with the law. With Mayor Richard Riotdan incteas- By CURTIS R. TUCKER Jr. ingly looking to use airport-generated revenues to support city services, LAX 'Most of the discussions about a proposed area residents are concerned that discus- e.x'pansion of Los Angeles International sions about the future of LAX will focus Airport have focused on economic issues. entirely on the economic issues, with noise, ~[issing is any serious consideration of the safety, trailtic and other important. factors people who live near ~he airport. and wha: considered secondarily. W'hat other expla- doubling its size would do to their nation is there for the Department of Air- -neighborhoods. ports' interest in constructing runways tn The Los Angeles Department. of Airports the Santa Monica Bay? Can we expect the is drafting an environmental impact report department to credibly evaluate the addi- re chart the future of LAX and examine the tiehal traffic [hat. major developments, [~otential impac~ of expansion, including a including Plays Vista, in LAX's backyard, projection ofLAXhandling95millionpas- would bring in combinatidn with an sengets a 7ear by 2015. In 1986. LAX &rpandedairport? reached its planned air passenger volume The department should not try to level of 40 million travelers. Since then. the accommodate all of Southern California's a~rport. has expanded its operations b7 35% · ~:uture needs in air travel at LAX, espe. and now serves 54 million passengers a 'cially when there are surplus military year. This increase happened without any 'bases available for commercial use just a examination of the impact that this dra- .county away. marie growth would have on the sur- · Everyone is aware of the airpor['s vital rounding communities. importance to the Southern California As we discuss the airporCs future, it is economy, bur. I do not believe we should be clear that more accountability and leader. ex'pec[ed to embrace an ever-ex'panding sh~p must be associated with the planning LAX as the necessary result of a growing process. Mistakes and missed opportunities economy and turn our heads ~rom what is can no longer be tolerated. also an ever-growing public nuisance. Millions were spent planning the widen- LAWs expansion must not come at the ing of the Sepulveda Boulevard tunnel. a expense of the neighboring communities. key access way to the airport, yet the access to the tunnel from the new Century Assemblyman Curtis R. Tucker Jr. is a Freeway is via a traffic signal that creates Dcmocrut. representinq [nqle~c'ood. .mite.long traffic jams. Another example of poor planning and wasted taxpayer dollars f, [he Green Line light-rail system. which stops short of the airport. Pe~'.h~ps the worst example of the Department of Airports' inability to plan for the future is its recent decision not to collect $3-per-passenger facility charges on certain wavelets using LAX. This fed- erally sanctioned fee could raise $5 million a month--money that could be used to soundproof homes in nearby communities or ~or public transportation improvement& including the recently aborted people- mover connecting :he airporCs parking [ot~ · and :he terminals. LOCAL NEWS'/WEATHER / EDITORIAL PAGES rs buffsRiordan,s Pitch I upport onA/rport'pfTr ] TIMF.~ STAFF W~jTER , . Pegan their mee--- · I ........ .r, .ped by Waters' office an' U~at ~rport s~ould exoann,,vfne_ed that t. d e . leMe see AIRPORT, B6 aupporL~ a Plan Lhat would nearly double Lhe PaSsenger capacity of · Continued feere BI [h~e airport and add lnlme "That congestion is ~a cargo ca a¢It_ bil!ion .to $12 bU17on.range /tom Waters, who had allowed a re- ~Aa_he in. creasing/y doe POrter to sit in on the se~ion, then ap.eec~ea anti rna,-~--_ Used it to argue down Riordan at 'geles, Rlorr~, ^"",~"6a ~.n t,oa An. every POint, COmplaining about ~, v, ~nuradaya~gued nolte from the a/rport a~ that the proposed expanat polluUon, traffic and the well as t°,,~..eregion'aecog ..... o. n la key burdell. It a~ co ..... ,,,,-uc ZLRLIre. t~at she ~a~d L~ being unfairly .... a uown :off her district. Th ..... .key part of almost Under ~ff_i,~?,: she 8aid, "is ,-.a. m oe Lhe ~*~.~- ., -.you want next century :~,_u~er ol .t.~de in the IL~ re~ldenL~ v~;~e~;['~. noUnS that ~, .... a, ~nen You na uemg asked to ", nmrdan ~ald. ve assume ad~tlonal burden "They a~wa--- airport that bel ..... a_ from an responded cri;~o~say that," Waters ,*rgue~ that the ISsue was jiob8' U~at ,earns. -,u hOcKey areas like Inglewood might be Riotdan gamely L'ted' :o make inconvenienced by the airport but also depended on tt "In ~ ,, ,his case, but/he COnversation con- Riotdan said ...... ' g ewood, 'For Jobs, [h .... .for emerged, ahakl._"[',~-,. the tndusLrte _e mayor ~ald, "fo · -~ ms ~lead s Lha£ rely on U~e airpor:~ in apparent exa~peraUon. jobs :hat support the aJrporL That's why the unions support the atr. Before he could take his leave, porL0, Riordan got his latest look at the Even that gambit fe1I shorL ~nternational A;rr~..~"°~~, -Angeles Waters ~aid. "They don't just say ,-,.~,t. ~ne mayor ~bs and pull my string., LOS ANGELES TIMES EDITORIALS MARK II. WILLES, I~abl~hcr DONALD F. WRIGHT. Pr~identandChio~r~cuffveOdl~'r M ICIIA£L PARKS, falitoraM&,nior Vice President JAN ET CLAYTON, 'Ed~toro/thefahYt~alPa~aml 'U-p-in the Air Over Airport Region must pull together on crucial transportation issue l'n the coming months, Southern Californians bigger airport or the brand-new one. What's will hear more and more about a contentious needled t. hist. lme 1~ a more evolved discussion .and vitally Important l~ue. It's the main- which county and city leaders work out a moth expansion project. for Los Angeles Inter- regional soluUon to the area'~ air traffic needs. national Airport, one that would transform That debate needs to begin now, and here are what is already one of the nation's busiest and ~ome of the fact& most crowded air fiekls into one capable of han- California, like the rest of the nation, I~ expe- dling the 11on's share o1' Pacific Rim traffic well rlencing huge Increases In air travel and air into the next century. cargo movement l~a~t. year, for example, .the On one side of the debate are Los Angeles equivalent of $20 mi. lllon passengers boarded Mayor Richard Riotdan and his supporters. aircraft at U.S. terminal& The l~ederal Aviation They view the expansion of LAX as a crucial Administration projects that figure to rl~e to part of a three-pronged approach that Includes nearly 900 mtllton by 2005. It'~ esLImated that the successhal completion of the Alameda high- the number of paasenger~ per year a~. LAX speed-rail cargo corridor and the expansion of grow to 98 million by 2015. That would be an the Port of Los Angeles. Their ambitiou~ goal ta increase of S2% ~lnce 190~. Air cargo I., pro- to turn Los Angeles into the nation's preemi- jeered to reach 4.2 million ton~ by 2015. That nent gateway for International trade and to would be a 140% Increase over 1994 figures. guarantee tta financial health for decades to California, a world player In many w~y~, has come. Ju~t two International airports of note, Los But. the megs-airport vision that Riotdan sold Angeles and San FYanctaco. Of equal algnffl- so successt'ull¥ on hts bu.qlnesatrip through Asia cance is the /act. that these are two or' the has not resonated nearly so natloWs most land-deficient. well back at home, anti more megs-airports, at 3,500 and salesmanship Is required. To 2,400 acres respectively. the mayor, the most impor- Orlando International, by rant goals are the frutta of comparison, encompasses expansion: as many as 72,000 14,720 acres and still Behar- more jobs and $20 billion to ' ares strident opposition to $:17 billion more gotng Into eapan~ton within 1~ perira- the regional economy. Here, elec. the mayor's barely con- Imagtne the comparable cealed Impatience with abeurdlt7 ot',hmt two major those who don't want the shipping porL~ in California,' added noise and congestion rather than the sul~tantlal can become his worst deep-water operations in enemy. boa Angeles/Long Beach, "lJn~ortunately, there are San Diego, Oakland and San those who would rather Francisco. The debate over attempt to disfrae[ the LAX expansion, one of several strport expansion would be public's attention t'rom the o0tlons on the table. has sparked relatively cordial It' there real i~sue surrounding LAX strong ol~l~osttlon in nearby areas. were five atrporta that could expansion--global compeU- share the load. tlveness. They are unable [o grasp sirepie e¢o- Meanwhile, other options for expansion are nomicl'acLs, and to them 'Jobs'Is Just a tour- also vigorously opposed--Burbank- letter word," the mayor has said. "It's boggling Glendale-Pasadena Airport, hong Beach Air- why anyone would focus their energy on deny- port and John Wayne AirporL AirporLa that lng Angelenos acceu to quality.lobs." don't race strong opposition to growth come Rtordan will be tn Westchester next week to with their own drawbacks. Palmdale Atrl~rt is tout the expansion. Undoubtedly, so will the a whopping 82 miles from LAX and 62 miles expanslon's most active opponent, City Coun- t'rom downtown Los Angeles; the area Is cilwoman Ruth Galant. er, who represenk~ the sparsely populated, accessible only through LAX area. Again, the problem ta the Intractable moanlath passes amt hardly a t'avored location stance taken by some of the antagonists. Gal- of the airlines. Ontario Airport seems [o present arttar and supporters have come up with a p~pe a viable option, but IL~ expansion ts held in check dream. It's a high-tach, high-speed aml de[i- b.y air qualit7 constralnLs. San Diego lacks sub- nitely high-cost rail project that ~ould, among ~tantlve International filghL~ and transport~ IL~ other things, connect each of the regton's air- long-haul passengers north to LAX. Orange port& It would supposedly allow Palmdale Air- County does the same, and a proposal there [or porttheopportunitytogrowenoughtoea~ethe an International airport at the El Toro Marine need to expamt LAX. Corps Air Station L~ highly controversial. Per- But just who In the federal or slate govern- haps the best option, ~lndlng a way to use a ment is going to buy Into funding another rail Chlmk o1' northern San Diego Count¥'s sprawl- project in Southern California? That's a partic- Ing Camp Pendleton as an International airport, ularly tough matter since It took ~ long to Isn't even on the table. exteml the Red Line subway the I'ew blocks Bt,t every one ot' these options deserve~ to be from Langer's Dell to the WIItern Theatre. explored. and a decision .~hould be reached on This brings tm to the recurring Southern Cal- what is best for the region. If that does not hap- tfornia morass that swallows up reason when- pen, and tf LAX expansion bogs down under the ever a bigger airport or a proposed one is dis- weight of lawsuits, then the projected air traffic, cussed: Pick your position. hold fast and ht~pe job~ and economic benefit will go somewhere qr}mr. other iHri~tlictinn will ~'~'~ ~t~Ick wilh tht, r.J~,,. hv r~l;m or drift. METRO SATURDAY MAY 9, 1998 AI~ORT A few days later, Riordan aides L AChief confirmed that the mayor's staff was negotiating to bring on Bar- e · Continued from BI bars Johnson, a respected lawyer and longtime political insider, to "Dan Garcia has done a Job act as a consultant to the adminis- of Airports nobody else could do in developing tratlon on airport issues. the master plan for LAX," the' Critics faulted that move, noting mayor said between stops on Capi- that Johnson Is a friend of Riordan tol [fill, where he has spent much confidant William Wardlaw. glor- IaOustedo, the week lobbying for federal dan aides defended it by saying · help on transportation, immigra- that she Is a talented and trusted lion, public safety and other issues. lawyer whose insights could help "He's one of the most brilliant and the mayor get a surer grip on the · Transportation: dedicated people I've ever known," airport expansion effort. Garcia did not return repeated Garcia also came under fire in Commission president to step calls seeking comment. ilia move down in wake of controversy from the commition to his new thedebate over Johnson's appoint- over proposed expansion. status as advisor will become offi- meat. Asked whether he felt pres- sial as soon as he submits a formal sure to hire Johnson as a consult- ant, Garcia responded that he letter of resignation, according tol wasn't sure how to answer, a vague By JIM NEWTON one Rtordan aide. response that angered Wardlaw TIM~r^FF WRITER Riordan did not speak to Garcia', and others close to the mayor. WASHINGTON--After months of regarding his removal, aides said. Some Riotdan aides also believedI mounting dissatisfaction with the cam- Rather, the job of negotiating his that Garcia was responsible for paign to expand Los Angeles Interns- move from unpaid commissioner to drawing public attention to the riohal Airport. Mayor Richard Riordan unpaid advisor fell to Robin Kra- contention over Johnson. has removed Dan Garcia as the presi- met, the mayor's chief of staff. And at the same time, Riordan' dent of '.he eity's Airport Commission. Kramer too was unavailable for~ publicly touted his friend and for-, although the attorney and business comment i;'rlday. ~ met NBC executive John Agogilai executive will serve as a mayoral advi- Although neither Riordan nod, as someone he believed could help sot. Kramer publicly expressed any un-i Garcia, a longtime local political in- take control of the airport expan- sider, has been Riordan's designated happiness with the eommissiorl sion--a Job that Garcia wassuppos- leader of the expansion effort. which has president's leadership, othefi edly already doing. Riordan's deci- lately become mired in controversy. It sources familiar w[th the discus-} sion to publicly float Agogila's also has stirred unhappiness within the signs said Rtordan thought that as{ name irritated Garcia. sources said, Riotdan administration. where officials the expansion plan moves from[ The proposed airport expansion have complained about not getting their development {o [mplementatlon--a would nearly double its capacity to money's worth from a host of consult- shift the mayor's office hopes will about 100 million passengers a ants hired to advise airport leaders on come about later this year--it will year. It would add 4 million square the proposed expansion. needs new type of leader. feet of cargo space, and is esti- Despite spending millions of dollars on The administration recently has mated to cost $8 billion to $12 community and public relations, there is shuffled a number of players at the billion, a tab that would make it little evidence that the expansion pro- airport. Last month, after The one of the most expensive public posal has won over skeptics. Times reported growing unhappi- works projects in the country. Meanwhile, Councilwoman Ruth Gal- ns.as with large consulting con- Led by Riotdan, proponents cite anter--who complains of the environ- tracts handed out to companies for mental. traffic and other effects of overseeing public relations at the the jobs and economic benefit that expanding the facility and instead favors airport, Riordan administration of- would flow from an enlarged air- development of the Palmdale airport-- ftcials demanded that one of those port. But critics of the plan are has steadily built a strong local coalition 'consultants. Edelman, Worldwide, bothered by Its cost. its potential opposing the administration's plans. bedropped from the project. effect on the communities closest That has deepened anxiety within the to the airport and its possibility for Riotdan team as it tries to sell a plan Airport General Manager Jack increased noise, traffic and poilu-' that it argues is essential to the city's Driseoll met with Edelmanofficlals lion. Just this week, U.S. Rep.' economic future. and said afterward through a Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles) On F'riday, however. Riotdan effu- spokeswoman that the airport and expressed grave reservations about sive[y praised Garcia. the company had reached a mutual the expansion plans during a Please ~ee AIRPORT, Ba understanding. Driscoll would not heated meeting with Riotdan. / elaborate. s t c T ~ o N i AlrpO~ CommLssk~ President Miguel Coneeras ~ be offered I Daniel Garcia has resigned. ~ panel posL sources say. FRIDAY MAY IS, 1998 IL.A. Airport Panel Chief Drops Bid to my e~-cuUve hoanJ and studytrig itUes to Irans~t contractors and an over the nes/ day or a~.- event-planning fu~n founded by Alatorre'· situation poses a dtf-Alatorr~'s wife. Ang~ Alatorre per- Keep Job Resigns ) , . ~. Liite O~'eis, the eouncihoan has · eon~ for the chariLies, which - l eng amocOUrn w~th a treu~ed est:hmveb, hired the ~ Went. peqie~L in ~is ca~e the subway ~lly Yaur~ ~tytng It more than '~ n PoilUcs: Mayor also dumps another c~,as~ tm~ as ~stent nut Onma a eonsk~ed · r~m.0m in teerot yea~ ~n cornmis~oner, but declines to seek embattled Coma·ran, the ,mvu~us pu~e omc~ ~ b,u ~ dmem of feclem ~ ~ DahL m m:blteet~or'· friend se"ved on a vme~y ~ mmmlmam sul~oenas for reem~ have been Councilman Alatorre's exit ~mm MTA-boarcL T'~t maed ee ae~ On T,~r~. f'~ ~nu~ who ~er~e, u e~.eu. for two n~t ,uator~ b~r con_ ~ITA busmeat day. Gan~ te~ fr~n the corn. ~..,'Uve seoretary-~of the ~atinm, some ret~ to his work In addiLks, the sta~ attorney By JIM NEWTON mbak~ t~ Ida iett~ of resig- Lo~ AngeJes County rederation of wtth U~e MTA, and ~ been absent TIMES STAff WIIT[.~ nal~nnavoidedaayrdetencetothe Labor, would bring an orpnised recon.tlywhilem:xweringft~nn.a.. general is investigating the Mayor Richard Rlordan received the re~g'nation of Premore put on lYm to leave, isborvoleetotheal,-po~expanainn gery Ior a torn dtaplu-a~n. &t this naneesof!~'entfully youth, which fg4ed to fully accrarot fe~ ~everal 'The time demands of O~e Ablx~rt debate and st~,ngO~m the polltical week's crudal and k~g-delayed Year~ofcl~ttyfund-ratsing. Airport Comml~ton President Daniel Garcia on T"nuraday. Cornmss·kin have encaieted ~ coallOon that Riotdan Is tr~ to voto on the age~,y'· tesl.-ue~-ing ~ year, A/ab~rre paid $8.000 in but he still declined to press embattled Oty Coun~dman last few monO~ to a level which buUd around the projecL Labor hu plan, an issue Omt ha· le-,es-ated ~ to state and lecal watchdog Richard &latorre to step down Irom ~ board of I~e . Metropolitan 'T~ansportatinn Authority. inte~eres wIOt the duUes ef my igenerally supported expansinn, eonaiderable eontrovorsy artrang age·des fortmpropedyinter¥oning According toaoutcescinee tothemayor andcouncUman, t~'uLtrjobandmypemmelUfe. md Iwhlch w~)uld create thousands of Alatorre'a gastei~ comUtuenta. the with c~ty regulator· on · I~ however, Alaton'ehesdiaeussedwtth~thepombil. ~I have, Om~'ore, concluded that ! [conotrueUon Jo~. Once eempletod, emmcllmanatma~ed. Issue involving E'venLfuHy Yeurt ity ofieaving the agency, which ha lervesat the mayor,s ahouldr~'Gatclaw~e, ~n e.q~nded alzlmrt al~ would Som-c~ cline to the mayor say The. ~Listo~tes have ~ they PieUure, Alatorre is a ck~e ally of the mayor, andakie~to which wore sent to menbers of the cz~ating an e~mated 375,000 per. idea of resigning from the hoazd Riordan said I~e mayor Is determined net to force the Clty Courtall, Ga,-cis IMed h~ ~ mauentJobt ~evetal months ago. T"ne smu. ees fund-r~acU~iUet councilman off the MTA board, even t~h he Is m'~er and w~ety admired ~erv~ce to t~e investigation by the I~BI and Internal Revenue Ser~qce, c~ty, but added aswtpe at Dahl, [members of the e~:uUve boa~ of ~ the mushrooming problems · PUal~in~ the councilman to lea ve, · mongotherasencies. t~ no~ by name, =In I~' [LAX21. ar~tworganinatkmereated Alatorre is u~ier scrutiny on with Riordan about ieavtng the I Alatorre's Problem· have fueled pressure oe Riotdan to G;mda w~ote, "1 wish to thank my ~to press k~r tbe al.'p0rt e~aminn. ~everad fronl. t g'ave rise to Alatorre'· di~cuss~om take the same atep wRh him that he dkl w-t0~ Gm:ia, but eoliea&R~s on Oe Bnard of Airport To~ethe~, tho~e two eommisa~m 'the ~ and the IR~, working MTA, soua'ees said, addin[ that the the mayor hu been reluctant to publk, ly chalienge the Icootmisaim~rs who, but for one nomlnemeovetabroad____.o~ wtth the U.~. attorney'· offk-.e In couneliman wsa not praise &bout councilman. who hu been one of Rlo~!an's mast loyal supporters on the Ctty Counc~L .em:eptkm, have been coo~raUve ran~e, nnd Rlordan ames expect Los Angeles, ate invesOptin~ his wben he mi~ht step aside, Rintd~n ' In Garcia'· case, there are no allept.~ns of wror~doin~, and di~e~t and have ·erred the themtow~nrelaUvelyesayeounctl personal finances. including hsano~ukedforsuchatimetable, · dtywelL' approval for pro.labor council whether he hought and remodeled accordingtotbesma. eet the mayor just grew lmpaUent with what hevtewedsa the A spokeswoman for the ccum~is. member· who are worried ·bout _~? E:agle Rnck heine with the help Rlordan Itimself would not dis- stalled expansion plans for Los Angeles International s~m sald DMd was out of the country the airport eXpansion, voting m a contractor tnd a real estate cu~ the ~ ~You'H have to Aiq~orL But when Garcia threatened to contest the andumvailableto~ ·gainst Contreras would be a Investor, who each had Richaz~L'besaidThur~day. mayor's demand for hIs resignation and began canvMsing Aecc~ to a0urces, the jobs of Izicky political move. mulUmilllon-dollar government Alatorre wu not immedtately the City Council for the votes needed to keep his job. the two out&,oing ~mmisa~me~ wtU On T'nuraday, Contreras said he de·is backed by the councilman. avaitabte for comment, and ·ides Riordan ·greed to dump · second member of the AL,'port be offend to John Agogila. · former had no( made up hIs mind whether On a parallel fronL ~ MTA decUnod to say whether he Pleuesee AIRPOR?,~ NBC exeouUve and friend of Rim-- toaceept thenominaUon. inspeclor genera] is inve~lgaLing setkingtoieavethe MTA'sbeard. dan. and Miguel Contzeraa. a labor =rye been a~ked to consider it," two children's c)mrities c.~ Tlme~ starr wdte~ Re4~t J. leader who ha~ been ~y he ~atd. ~ril be I~king It up with by the lawmaker and theLr financial eeetrlbet~ to bas story. RIor~n for a number * · LOS ANGE'LI~$ TINIIiS SUNDAY, A?RIL It). It)98 * xpansion AIRPORT: Public Relations Con(tnued ~ront A I Hobin Kramer, Riordan's chief of Publicists Are ~,~,,,,,~,,~, ~,,~ yielded re. tan- gible results. In fact, residents of was disapl~inted by the efforLg of the communitic~ surrounding the the consultants. e~er to reaLst the pro~ed $g-bil- a~ut the need to Increase the lion to $12-billiotl expanMon, which eapaeit~ of the airart Is an Im~r- wotlhl ilearl~ {hmhle the air~rt's rant piece of the m~qter plan pr~- ByJIM NE~ON ;illfilial pain, eager traffle and add ~q." she ~lid. "In our view. this ~nilliona of aqtlare feet to iL~ eargo Im~rtant pteee haa ~en laeklua- 1~ AnRel~ International Alert ~:apaeity. tee." offieial~, determined to pr~ for a A~ a rt~ult. ~}ure~ close to Mayor Asked how aertoua the problems ma~ive e~a~ion d~ite ~mmu- ~{icha~l Riord;m ~ the adminis- were. Kramer rea~nded: '~l'here'a nity r~mhanee, are ~ing rail- ~xatlon has grown inere~inRly woe- a huge need for hnprovement." lions of dolla~ on public relatio~ :.'i~l that the may~r will ~ hehl Jack I)rL<oll. general manager and cnmmllnity outreach. even ~ ('S{~llt~lhh: (or what ;t~m;t~ [o }~ 3 the ai~:rt, cone~l~l that the never r~eiv~l eit~ approval, "[~t'a face it," sam ¢me per,on but defended their overall work. Crttic~ of the expansion. includ- oh,so to the m;tyor. "We've ~pent "There'a some di~sati~faction," loft Cit~ Councilwoman Ruth Cal- ;dl th~s money, and we're further he aaid. "lh~t I'm not that un- anter, say that the money ha~ been I.q~*nd th:m whell we Marred." happy .... I thillk we need to ~et misspent and that the airport should not ~ drumming up eom- mtm~t~ ~up~}rt for an expansion that ha.~ yet to t~e approve--either by the Airart Commimion or the City Council. Pr~ments of an enlarged a~r. i~rt. meanwhile, argue that they t~ are troubled by the ex~ndi. ture~ but mainl~ Iracause they are trotter information into the eom- r~n~ible for overseeing the ex. worried that lhe city is not getting mumty. and we're working on panMoo effort, waa out of the g~xl r~tllt~ for iL~ money. Ihat." country and unavailable for ~m. According to city recor~L~, four Although Jiiordan i~ a longtime meat. firms have linen h~red by the $tlp~}rter of the at~rt'a expan- ~me of the eonaultanL~ de- Airport Commission to handle sion, he had larKely delegat~ re- fend~ their work and nol~ that community relationa, government s~m~lhfitty to the atari ~ff aml they are trapp~ ~tw~11 erltic~ relation~ and public relations. To- commi~qtnn until recently. In the who ~y that they are not doing gether, they are ex~t~l to re. paM few months, however, lhe e~:gh and thee who worry that celve atx)lJ{ $fi million for their mayor ha.~ taken n lloticeabl~ more theyare(loinR t~ milch. work on the expanslotl effort, ~CtlV{~ interest. worktitg with hi~ "We do I1Ot want to be Otlt there. known a~ the air[~rt master plan. advt~r~ on a plan tn refrain control troycad ~lvinR what Informatl[m One company, Conaensu~ Plan. of the i~ue. n~ Io ~ availablo to have a rang Gro~Jp. I~ ~chedtll~l to ~ paid Although [{it)edna wa~ not avail. re.x~ned debate," ~ald John Stc~l. $2.2 mllh(m to hal~(lle commtlmty M)le fi~r comment. otherN elo~e to der. senmr vice president at ~lel- outreach. Two firm~. [':mer~on and ~he mayor ~aid hm heighteast man Worldwide. which I~ handbag Aspirates and Planning Company ;~ctivity re{lect~ ~everal realt~a. publlerelation~fnrtheproj~L A~iat~, are handIlaR interRov- eramenial eo~lmiealiofta for a tion~. In part, the mayor's r~ent Neverthelem, some critics are total of nearly $1.4 millton~ The Irlp to A~la drove home the tm~r. bothered by the money being fourth firm. ~Melman Worldwide, ta~e of airport e~anslon. and the ~nt. i~ t~tnR paid $1.4 million to handle l'o~rL~ of conmfltant e~enditure~ Galanter, the leader of the publierelatmn~. havetrotdd~lhtm.~ource$~atd. panMoo opponenta. complained They are juM fn~sr of more than Dan Garcia, president of the that the money going to public two dozen con~ultant~ working oil fiir~)rt Commission alld the per~n relation~ and community outreach the e~pan~ion effort. The remain. der are ~rforminR more t~hnical ta~k~ ~lleh a~ urban design. envi- ronmental analy~i~ and tran~rta- t~on planning. All tohl, the airart expceta to ~pend nearly $40 million And yet. aa city offictalg pri- vately acknnwledRe, the outreach Please ~ee AIRPORT, A~ ts tn effect a city eq~enditure to she'a at ~me of thee t~." h,hhy for a pro~sal that has not Drl~coll. the airart manager, r,'ceivedeltyapprnvaL ~id Calantee had complained to The effort i~ sn blatant, she aaid, him a~:t a meeting of the Central that one of the consultants ha~ a City A~n. at which she ~ke and p~'*r~on attend Galanter'~ a~echea was ~u~rlsed to find a to monitor her remarks. The coun* Planning representative at the cdwoman has taken to mtr~hlctnff hie. D~eoll ~td he told the cotin- the con~sltant, a representative of ellwoman, "We're not trailing you. {~[OIl~ell.~tl~ Planning, a~ "her Thtawn~apubllcmeetlng." ~P'I:I~IOWr'' The con~ultan~ are under In- ~:11~lheth Gardner, vice prell- ~truetion to Eather community d~rlt of Con~en~J~ I'lanntnR. re- put. Dripoil added. and Galanice I$ ~l,onded that C;alanter wa.s not part or the debate over the airart, h~.mR ~mgled ~:tlt. I{ather, ~he ~aid. ~ the eon~ultanLq inevitably find O~e f~rm'~ representatlve~ were themselves at some of the ~ame trying to Rather Information from funcUpid. all i~.r~pective~. and ~cau~e ~al- Overall, he ~ald. the perform. anter nf{en ~peak~ on the topic, anee o{ the eonaultlng group~ has firm offictal~ ~ca~tonally bump ~enfatrlyg~l. ,~:o her. "Could we do ~tter? My arewee %~e are at all sorts of different to that ~ y~." he ~id. "Are we events where the a~ort is ~ing creating IohbyisL~ out o( ~e ~- ~ ~;c ~sed," Cardnee aaid. "I'm ~tJre ~lltanL~ My a~wer ~ Lhat I$ ~." METRO NEWS · FRIDAY, MAY 1. 1998a Pressured by Mayor, LAX Drops Consultant LAX ~ Continued from B3 sion," was all that q~okeswoman In her letter, Johnson alluded to · Airport: Friend.0f ,' · Nancy Castles 'would say. Jack tha't, telling Martin: "I agree that the Riotdan advisor may Driscoll, general manager of the contract will send a signal and serve · , instead' handle public airp6rt, declined to elaborate. to focus attention as to just how But Galanter, whose determined seriously you view ~ effort." '/relations for proposed right against the exp~/nsion appears Dan Garcia, president of the 'exp/insi6n. -' .to be. gaining groun. d,. u~ed the airport commission, said he had occasion ~o tweak Rlordan. heard that the mayor's office was .~ "This,is Dick Riotdan°-~ prob- interested in having the airport By JIM NEWTON . ' lem," she said. "He thinks that air 'hire Johnson, but had not discussed ~s STA~ W~ safety and ground safety and air the issue directly with Rlordan. pollution and traffic congestion are "The issue of retaining Barbara Under pressure fr9m Mayor. public relations problems. But to Johnson ... has certainly been Richard Riotdan, .-atrport officials the people who experience them, raised," he said. "It seems that a lot have dropped a consultant charged they're real problems." of talk abolat it has taken place." '. with managing public relations for With Edelman now' out of the . Asked whether.he felt pressured · the proposed expansion of Los airport picture, top aides to Riotdan ' to bring her on, Garcia responded: 'Angeles International Airport, privately have discussed hiring Bar- "I can't tell." even as the mayor's aides work hara Yanow Johnson, a well-con- Noelia Rodriguez, the mayor's 'behind the scenes to hire a friend nected lawyer, significant Demo- press secretary, said there was no of Riordan'a closest advisor. cratlc Party fixture and close friend pressure on anyone to hire Johnson The outgoing consultant, Edel- of Riotdan confidant Bill Wardlaw. because, ff a deal with her can be man Worldwide, had been working According to a lettei' from John- finalized, it would have her report- under a $1.67-million contract to son to Deputy Mayor Kelly Martin, ing directly to the mayor's office, provide public outreach for the the two have talked about hiring not the airport commission. Rodrt- multibilLion-dollar project, which is Johnson to work ~.wo to three days guez said negotiations with Johnson being studied 'by the airport staff a week. Although the letter did not were not quite complete, but that and commission but has yet to specify for how long that work Riotdan "is looking forward to her receive approval from either the would continue, Johnson proposed being part of his administration." ' city or federal government. that she be paid $10,000 a month-- ' Galanter said the discussions bet The size of that contract and or more than $1,0(}0 a day. tween the mayor's office and John- other consulting agreements at the The letter is dated April 14, 1996, son were evidence that the Riot- airport have provoked criticism but sources familiar with it said the dan administration is skirting city from both sides of the intense and year. is incorrect, and that the rules on the hiring of outside expanding airport debate. Supportt ' letter actua!ly.w_._~ written in April consultants in order to steer a ers of the expansion, such as Riot- of thls ye.~ar:/'.-~.~ ~"~.. ' contract to a supporter. dan, have complained that they are The n~yor'$1~ c~ not hired "That's the way they've been not getting their money's worth; Johnson. d~l'~ectl¥.~..~'~T~fi.' her letter, doing business since they hit opponents, leVI by Coundlwoman she Lvhp[ied~tl~[-~he-~6q:~ts to be town," Galanter said. Ruth. Galanter, have questioned ' receiving" .cit~.~'m really "Mayor Riotdan is very fond of the propriety of paying city money 1ookih~,~.! ' .oL'wardcfo.~,~o, rldng to- criticizing all his predecessors and to build support for a project .that . gethe~,,'TJ.o/i. ns6h ~r~'te. I a.~ume I everybody else in public life ot has not been approved. //will ' '~'~".d~recUy]~-y'ou, and will cronyism," she added. "But he's .The proposed expansion wouldi I work .'~th ypur staff per- one of the best examples of that .nearly double capacity at the air- "..kaon "~;'r~,~:-~'~__ '...J"..~ that we have.. ' . The nicest i po~t, already. one of the _n,a_tion's '~'~-au~l~st~l~'..'~.~.ohnson al- thing I can think of to say is that ~'lariest and one of the region s most rea~ly-has~en-d./_~lied a job has 'it's riscally irresponsible." ~nportant generators of economic reached some member~ of the air- Rodriguez dismissed tho~e com- acti,~ity. Estimates for the expan- port commi.~ion and other airport ments and said Riotdan was sion range from $8 billion to $12 officials, who grumble ~hat the- pleased to be able to attract some- billion, money that Riotdan and Riotdan administration, after oneolJohnson'sabllittes. others say would help create hun- downplaying the sert0usnes.~ of the "The mayor is proud that he is · dreds of thousands of jobs and LAX expansion bsaue for months, able torecruithlgh-quality, tntelli- enrich the region. Opponents now is applying imp ~r~r pressure . gent, enthusiastic people who are counter that residents living near on the project. dedicated to Los Angeles, who the a/rport already shoulder too In fact, the may.o~a~ office has want to make a difference for Los much of the burden for air traffic, been eager in recent months to Angeles and who care about the and instead favor development of ' demonstrate ils resolve on the future of Los Angeles," she said. other Southern California airports issue. Riotdan has been mentioning "Barbara will be an A-plus mere- such as Palmdale. the expansion in mo~t of his major bet of that team." At the airport, officials would speeches, and his aides have been say litfie about the decision to drop working to improve their oversight Edelman. of the projecL ~ / · '~I'hey reached a mutual conclu- Ple~-~ ~ee LAX, B5 B2 TUESDAY. MARCH I& 1997 LOS ANGF[E$ TIMF~ Have a comment or an idea?~ A look at ~u~, To~eN~ -- ~ ~o~~ L.R. Obsened .~~ help~g to sha~ · u~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~e~s r~s, r~ M~ ~In racL 1~ Angel~l a more ~an a cltr. h ~ a ~, ~ ~ ~ the emer~g m,~- ~ I metropo~. ~ Angel~: P~face m a M~r P~ ( lg41 ) ~ ~ Los Angeles IntematJonal Airl~rt ~s the world's third-busiest Passenge airport--and one-of ~e largest sources of smog in the region. City offioals expect 85 million to 90 million travelers Ptx~ee by a year to descend on the KE~ LL;BAS racilit3, by 2015. Los ^n~-tes ~mes Jet Lag in Pollution Control Increased Emissions From the Gro~g Numar of Airl~e~ at ~ Are Hu~g Effo~ to I~ ~1 ~ ~ey ~ ~r the S~ ~ite StYgent R~afion of Ind~fi~ ~d Ve~cl~. ~MAR~ cO~E ~~~-~~ ~vay. Je~ ~ ~ ~Y--~ ~d~ng ~ ~ by ~1~ ~ ~~t~s~_~ mill~ ~e~~~ . T~y, ~--~e w~d's ~-~ ~n~ ~g ~gh~ ~ ~v~ ~--b~~~m~ . ~e~ev~we~ ~ R~a~g~e~a~~ ~e~~t~' ~Y~~.~e~a~ ~ty M~g~t ~ ~~ emmm fm a ~ng n~ y~.- ~e ~ ~ m tu ~ =H~g~. ~ ~ ~v~ ~ f~ Umt~ every ~ ~ ~m ~~t ~ veh~l~m~-~~by m~~ly~~~y~. ' F~A~A~~U~ eighty. But A~ ~ ~y ~t ~n~ ~ m ~tght m f~, ~e ~nt ~ bw~ ~ ~y. ~h-~ ~by ~~ ~ ~ye~,~ ~m~ for ~ f~ landing a~ mk~. p~le~ ~t ~ ~ AnEel~ Cou~iL f~ M~ la~m--a~ often fo~tten--~ of ~ ~11u~ SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 27. 1998 . E~"~ tario Intemational's new $269-million glass and steel terminals, which open today, will neady double the airport's capacity. qew Terminals at Ontario Airport Open., ~ould Help Relieve Congestion in Area ONTARIO: Airport Expands Continued from B2 Orange County. · agers also are hoping to attract But both the I_&X expansion and charter flights from Europe. El Toro conversion face fierce Analysts say such marketing opposition. efforts are not essential for contin- If LAX remains at its current uedgrowth. capacity, the association projects "Because population and eco- annual passenger demand at&On- nomic krowth is stronger in the ratio to climb to 22 million by 2020. Inland Empire than the region as a Without a commercial airport at whole, there's a definite need [for El Toro--and minus the LAX the new terminals], though it pansion--the association predicts might not be readily apparent in that Ontario would have to move' the next two or three yearn," said 28 million passengers a year. Tim Metwin, an aviation planner To accommodate that many for the Southern California Assn. of travelers, /derwin said, another Governments. runway and more terminal~ would One advantage Ontario holds is have to be built at Ontario. · ~ its neighborhood. The airport was One obstacle is a California' Air built in an area zoned mainly for Resources Board restriction that industrial andcommercialuses. limits the airport to 12 million Although nearbyhomeowners-- annual passengers, or 125;000 and some neighboring cities--corn- takeoffs and landings per year.. plain about noise and ~crutinize Airport officials expect thi.· 3dr growth plans, opposition is "not at Resources Board to eventtially the level or intensity of E1 Toro, ease the limits became of improve.- LAX or Burbank," Merwin said. ments in aircraft technology. He estimates that Southern Cali- Planes now operate more cleanly. fornia air travel demand will rise to But even under the most 6pti- 157 million passengers in 2020, up mistic outcomes, Ontario offim~ls from 74 million in 1995. say no single airport can absorb l.he To accommodate the growth, the region's growing number of travel- association projects that LAX will ers. Each has their own boo. min. g handle 94 million passengers in communities. 2020. In Orange County, John Besides, Driscoll said,, as Wayne Airport is limited by a court Southern California's populat!pn settlemeht to 8.4 million annual growth continues, directing. pas- passengers. sengers to faraway airports wo. uld So transportation planners look simply create a different ki.nd2of to the conversion of the El Toro gridlbck: . ,.z Marine Corps Air Station to corn- "It would mean driving:for mercial use to handle growth in hours." ..., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Stadium: · Quakes opening day is April 8, 1999. · A pre-bid meeting will be held on March 9th, for the painting and exterior stucco repair project for the Sports Facility. Bids will be opened on March 16th. Accommodations will be made to conduct the work around the Quakes game schedule. The light fixtures at the stadium are scheduled for a complete re-bulb and re-aiming in late March. · CPW has started working on the Cross-aisle Waterproofing Project. Estimated time to complete the project is 3 weeks. Eftwanda Creek Park: · The costs estimates have been completed by staff for the addition of two scoreboards. Once the financial arrangements have been completed, the project will be submitted to City Council for approval. · In preparation for the soccer season, the Grounds Crew at Etiwanda Creek Park sprayed the fields to line them for soccer, which began in February. This is the first year that the turf has gone dormant, so the lines may not show because Roundup won't leave marks in dormant turf. Bear Gulch Park/Arbor Day: · The annual Tree City USA application submitted last month to the Califomia Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has been approved by the Department and forwarded to the National CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 2 Arbor Day Foundation. This year, Arbor Day will be celebrated at Bear Gulch Park on March 17th. Jeff Barnes is coordinating with Bear Gulch Elementary School to have some of the children participate in the planting of the trees. Itermosa Park: · Hermosa Park playground has experienced multiple vandalism incidents this month. The major damage consisted of broken structure clamps; burned/melted end caps on the upright pipes; panels, and damaged slide sections and deck rails. The Police were notified and a report was filed in each instance. Central Park: · A Task Force meeting was held on Tuesday, March 16th at 6 p.m. Agenda items included a report on the survey questions which have been prepared for the upcoming random survey. All City Parks: · In an attempt to persuade dog owners to pick up after their canines, we have installed new signs in problem Park locations. The signs say: "PLEASE RESPECT THE OTHER USERS OF THIS PARK BY CLEANING UP AFTER YOUR DOG". Even at this early date, it seems that the signs may be helping to eliminate the problem (no pun intended). Signs have been installed in Red Hill, Heritage, Ellena, Hermosa, West Greenway, and Milliken Parks. Trails: · The abandoned rail road right of way was measured by City crews to obtain a cleanup and maintenance estimate to submit to SANBAG for a reimbursement agreement approval. City Hall: · A pre-bidjob meeting will be held on March 10th, for the Security Systems Upgrade Project. Bid opening is scheduled for March 17, 1999. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: · The 5th Annual Senior Art Show was held at the Senior Center on March 6th and 7th, 1999. This was a non-juried art competition featuring oil/acrylic, watercolor/pastel, mixed media, sculpture, photography and graphite. Participation in the Show was open to all seniors age 50 and over. The show included arts works, demonstrations, refreshments and entertainment. At the time this report was prepared fifty-nine entries were submitted by 25 individuals. · A St. Patrick's Day party was held at the Senior Center this morning from 10:45 a.m. to 11:15 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 3 a.m. This special day for the wearing of the green included entertainment featuring the singing of old Irish favorites, refreshments, games and a lot of tim. · The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Chorale will be representing our seniors at the 5 city ,Golden Follies. This talent showcase will be held on March 27, 1999, at the Montelair Community Center between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.. · A Spring Fling will be held at the Senior Center on Thursday, April 1, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. This special event is co-sponsored by the VIP Club and will include bunny hopping, egg throwing, a spring bonnet parade, door prizes, games and refreshments. · The Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next meeting on March 22, 1999. At the time this report was prepared the agenda for the March meeting had not been set. Teens: · The Teen Center hosted a successful event, "That 70's Dance," at the Lions Community Center West on Saturday, February 27th. The dance paid homage to the disco era with disco clothes and music. Next month's special teen event will feature a "March Madness" sports challenge at the RC Family Sports Center on March 27th. · On February 15th, 50 teens hit the slopes of Mountain High participating in their annual ski trip. Teen Trips are scheduled during the summer and on school holidays. The next set of trips will take place during the first week of April for spring break. At that time the teens will visit Knott's Berry Farm and the beach. · Our teen workshop series continues with the popular Job Skills Workshop scheduled for Saturday, March 27th. The workshop will :focus on looking for a job, filling out an application, getting through the interview process, and once hired, how to be a outstanding employee. The next workshop in the series will be held in May and will focus on securing financial aid for college. · In February, early enrollment began for returning volunteers for the summer program, the Teen Learning Center (TLC). In March, enrollment opens to the general public. Applicants are screened and interviewed in March, April and May. In June they are placed into a variety of summer volunteer jobs based on their interest and availability. Jobs include youth counselors for day camp, kinder camp, and Kid Explorers and classroom aids for Play Camp. · The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) meets each month at Lions Community Center East and has extended, by popular demand, its babysitting program from twice monthly October through May, to every other week year rotrod. The "Night on the Town" program gives teens the opportunity to provide activities for youth at the Center every other week from 6:00 p.m. to mid-night. Parents can enjoy an evening out, and their children can have a great time. Attendance averages between 25 to 30 children per session. Youth Activities: · The 3rd Annual Spring Children's Concert is scheduled for Saturday, April 3, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium. This year, the headline performers are "E-Rock CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 4 for Kids." E-Rock is an 9-piece band and performance ensemble that plays original children's music. The concert promises to be a lively and fun event for all ages. All youngsters attending the concert will be given a free girl, a cool pair of brightly colored sunglasses. Rancho Grande Kiwanis will be helping set up and ushering at this community event. Admission is free. · Playschool began new classes in early February. The program added classes at the Mulberry Learning Center to meet the needs of the community. In addition, a brand new class, "Ready Readers" has begun. This class is for children already enrolled in the "Fabulous Fours and Fives" classes who are ready to move on to learning early reading skills. In April, early enrollment for those returning to the Playschool program in the Fall will begin. · Registration begins for Play Camp, the popular summer version of Playschool in mid-March. Twenty-eight classes are offered that can serve over 500 children through the course of the summer. · Registration also begins in March for Day Camp and Kinder Camp. Both of these Camps are offered for nine weeks during the summer and have availability for a total of 65 children per week. Youth Sports: · The Winter Youth Basketball playoffs began on February 27th. Five sites were used for the games. They included: Vineyard Junior High School, Summit Intermediate School, Etiwanda Intermediate School, Alta Loma High School, and the RC Family Sports Center. Nearly one thousand boys and girls participated on 120 teams. The finals were played on March 13th at Alta Loma High School. · Pee Wee Basketball will conclude its games on March 22ha. Two hundred, eighty-eight (288) boys and girls, ages 3-5 are participating. Deputy City Manager Jerry Fulwood is one of our star volunteer coaches. · The spring Pee Wee Soccer program begins April 12th. Currently, one hundred and thirty-six (136) boys and girls, ages 3-5 are registered. Registration concludes on March 18th. · Youth Roller Hockey practices began on March 15th. Games will begin on March 29th. Two hundred (200) boys and girls, ages 5-16 are registered. · Twelve (12) youth basketball teams will represent the City in the Inland Valley Municipal Athletic Association Tournament on March 20'h and 21 s,. Cities hosting playoff games will be Jurupa, Norco, Riverside, and Rancho Cucamonga. This will be the first time the City of Rancho Cucamonga has hosted these exciting playoffs. The RC Family Sports Center will host the Boys Division A-Blue Toumament for boys, ages 13-14~ Teams from throughout the Inland Empire will participate. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center: · Youth Indoor Soccer has over136 children, ages 5- t 4 registered in the program. Practices began in late February and games began on March 8th. · Adult Volleyball Leagues continue league play through March. One hundred (100) men and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 5 women are participating on 10 teams. Adult Basketball Leagues continue league play through March. Over one hundred and forty-four (144) men and women are participating in eighteen (18) full court teams. · Forty-four (44) men are participating on 9 Three-on Three Basketball League teams. · Fourteen (14) players are currently participating in two Adult Racquetball Leagues. · The facility continues to be extremely busy. During the month of February, 1999, facility usage for open/drop-in play was as follows: Adult Basketball -1,082; Youth Basketball - 812; Adult Racquetball - 753; Youth Racquetball - 69; Adult Volleyball - 46; Youth Volleyball -13. Adult Sports: · The Adult Softball Program has two thousand, three hundred and thirty-six (2,336) men and women participating on one hundred and forty-six (146) teams. Two hundred and forty (240) men and women are participating on 21 Adult 6 Aside Soccer teams. · Four hundred and thirty-two (432) men and women are participating on 23 Full Field Adult Soccer teams this season. · Adult Flag Football has 120 men participating on 15 teams this season. Proposed Boxing Program: · An update memorandum was recently sent to City Council discussing various options available pertaining to the proposed boxing program. The YMCA expressed preliminary interest in conducting this program. They have been evaluating this potential for a number of months. Staff will continue to pursue this possibility with the YMCA on a regular basis. Senior Transportation Program: · The new senior citizen transportation program was initiated by the YMCA in mid-February. The YMCA, in partnership with the City, utilizes a 15 seat passenger bus to provide two morning trips picking up senior citizens at their homes, taking them to the Senior Center for the nutrition and recreation program, and two aitemoon trips returning seniors to their homes. Currently there are 27 individuals utilizing the service (some use the program daily, others 2-3 times per week and still others only occasionally.) Of the 27 seniors on the list, 10 are being picked up from senior housing complexes in our City. Five from Villa Pacifica and 5 from Heritage Park. A detailed report on ridership for the senior transportation program will be submitted to the Council on a quarterly basis. Trips and Tours: The following trips are scheduled during the reporting period: · Medieval Times - March 5, 1999. This trip was canceled due to insufficient registrations. · The Price is Right - March 25, 1999. This trip was reseheduled from February 24t~. Almost all of the participants were able to make the date change, and therefore will "come on down" to CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 6 enjoy this popular TV game show with Bob Barker. (Sorry, trip sold out.) · The Glory of Easter - March 27, 1999. Guests will view this spectacular pageant at the world famous Crystal Cathedral. Over 100 actors and special effects recreate the story of Passion Week. (Seats are still available.) · The Flower Fields of Carlsbad - April 7, 1999. This tour will start with lunch in San Diego at the famous Tom Ham's Lighthouse Restaurant overlooking the harbor. Participants will then view one of the most spectacular flower displays in the world. Separated into ribbon-like bands of color the blooms create a 'sea of flowers', as far as the eye can see. These fields attract visitors from all over the world who are amazed by this unique sight. (Seats are still available.) · Lawrence Welk Dinner Theater - April 18, 1999. Upon arrival at the resort, guests will be treated to a sumptuous buffet luncheon. Afterwards participants will enjoy the live stage performance of "Damn Yankees". Human Services: · Tax Preparation Assistance - A free tax service available to assist seniors and low income residents with their tax preparation. This service, which is conducted by AARP and the IRS, will be available each week at the Senior Center until April 13th. Interested participants need to call for an appointment. · A Women's Wellness Lecture will be held at the Senior Center on Tuesday, March 23ra at 1:00 p.m.. In the first of a Women's Wellness lecture series, Dr. Anita Kundi of Heritage Hospital will present an informative discussion on Natural Estrogen Replacement. This free lecture requires pre-registration through the Senior Center. · Commodity Distribution - First Monday of the month from 1:30 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. USDA surplus food products are distributed to low income Rancho Cucamonga residents on a first come, first serve basis. Next distribution date is: April 5th. · Elder Law Seminars - Seminars on important senior issues are presented monthly at the Senior Center. The next presentation will be on March 26th at 11:00 a.m. - the topic being presented is "Enjoying Equity Stock Market Gains Without Risk to Principal". Private counseling sessions will also be available on Friday, March 26th from 12 noon - 2:00 p.m. · The Doctor is In - During the month of March, Dr. Cohen provided two free informative programs for the community. The first program was part of the regular monthly afternoon presentations offered free of charge on the third Tuesday of the month at the Senior Center - the topic of this program was "High Cholesterol". A special evening presentation was held on March 17th. At this program Dr. Cohen discussed new treatments available for depression. On April 20th , the doctor will speak at 12 noon at the Center on "Osteoporosis". · A Chiropractic Health lecture is scheduled for Friday, March 26th at 1:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. A new lecture series from Heritage Hospital will feature Dr. Arthur Haberman, discussing Optimum Health through Chiropractics. Pre-registration at the Senior Center is required. · An immunization clinic is held at the Senior Center on the second and fourth Monday of the month. The program is co-sponsored by the County of San Bernardino and is for individuals CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 7 ages 2 months through 18 years of age, as well as senior citizens. Immunizations for March will be held on the 8th and 22nd at 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Cost is $8.00 per shot. Facilities: · Facilities maintenance staff is in the process of replacing the floor mats, steam table and pass through counter in the Senior Center kitchen. All of these items potentially posed safety concerns. · Maintenance has ordered a new racquetball door for the Jaguar racquetball court at the RC Family Sports Center due to problems that have occurred with the door since the Center opened. It is anticipated that the new door will be installed by April. · Spruce Avenue Park Skate Facilits,_ is a very popular place for skateboarders and in-line skaters. The park averages 75-150 skaters per day. Numbers can almost double on weekends. Recently, we have received some complaints regarding bicyclists and skaters using the facility after dusk. Staff has been scheduled to be at the park weekdays between 4:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. to monitor activities. The Police Department has also been patrolling the site. Staff has also disseminated flyers to the skaters reminding them to respect the park and follows the rules. · A special demonstration and safety clinic is scheduled at the Skate Facility on Saturday, March 27th from 11:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m.. Community Services staff, Active Ride Shop, TRAC, and Carl's Jr., along with some type of musical element, will create an attractive atmosphere where demonstrators can perform and inform skaters about safety issues, protective equipment, and new gear out on the market. Quarterly workshops and safety clinics are planned to educate skaters and provide special activities for all who participate. · Heritage Park Equestrian Center - During the month of March, Alta Riding Club has scheduled a hunter/jumper show on the 14m from 8 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.. Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy has a schooling show on the 21 at, also from 8-5 p.m.. During April, Alta Loma Riding Club will have a benefit play day on Sunday, April 11~ from 9-4 p.m.; 4-H Rancho Rebels will be having a horse show on the 17th from 8-5 p.m.; and on the 24th Citizen Patrol will hold a training day from 8-5 p.m.. The Grapevine: · The Spring issue of The Grapevine, which began production in late December went to print on February 4t~ and was delivered to residents in early March. Over 50,000 copies of the 44-page magazine were printed, with 48,000 being direct mailed to residents. The Summer issue began production Contract Classes: · The Winter session of contract classes ended in March. Over two hundred (200) different class opportunities were offered to community members. Total enrollment for the Winter session was 1,970 registrants. The Spring session begins in April. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 8 Community Wide Special Events: · Amusing Children's Theater (ACT) will again be offered one Saturday per month from February through April, 1999. The line-up of entertainment includes: Families First concert, a Magical Balloon Illusionist Show was held on Saturday, February 20, 1999, at 2:00 p.m. at Alta Loma High School and was a success. An audience of 250 were treated to a fun afternoon of balloons, comedy and magic presented by Majiloon (Kelly Duro), the world's only balloon illusionist. The Franklin Haynes Marionettes and the Crazy_ Music Machine Puppet Show will perform on Saturday, March 20th. The Marionettes program will provide comedy and puppet entertainment through a variety of characters. The Crazy Music Machine Puppet Show stars Daniel Porcu who presents a puppet story of a tiger who captures animals for profit, but ends up getting captured himself, thereby learning a valuable lesson in the process. The performance begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Fillipi Room at Lions Community Center West. Tickets are $5.00 and will be available at the Community Services Department and at Lions Community Center East. Internationally known Jay Leslie will present a comedy/magic show that includes audience participation on Saturday, April 17th. The performance is at 7:00 p.m. in the Fillipi Room at Lions Community Center West. Tickets are $5.00 and will be available at the Community Services Department at the Civic Center and at Lions Community Center East. California Park and Recreation Society Conference: · Several staff were on hand on February 20th at the presentation of the California Parks and Recreation Society (CPRS) 1998 CPRS Facility Design and Park Planning Award for the RC Family Sports Center. The award was accepted by Park and Recreation Commissioner, Gary Bemis and Senior Park Planner, Karen McGuire-Emery. Park and Recreation Commission: · The Park and Recreation Commission met on February 18, 1999 and the following items were discussed: -Update and establishment of future items for the Senior Advisory Committee. -Update and establishment of future items for the Sports Advisory Committee. -Consideration of a proposal from Coca Cola to install two beverage vending machines at Spruce Park. -Discussion of issues and policies associated with Internet access at City community centers. -Selection of a Park and Recreation Commissioner and an alternate to serve on the General Plan Task Force. -Discussion relating to inclusion of full-size basketball courts at City parks. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE March 17, 1999 Page 9 Epicenter: · Staff is working with the following representatives for future events at the Epicenter: -Community Services Department - Children's Concert (April 3, 1999) -Calvary Chapel Chino Hills - Easter Sunrise Services (April 4, 1999) -California Association of School Transportation Officials - School Bus Roadeo (April 16/17, 1999) -Hillside Community Church - Soapbox Derby and Community Fair (May 30/31, 1999) -Daily Bulletin/Quakes/City - All Stars Game (June 8, 1999) -Promotec Marketing -Used Car Super Tent Sale (June 9-14,1999) -Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremony (June 17, 1999) · Staff has received notification from AB Miller High School stating that they will not be returning to the Epicenter for their 1999 graduation ceremony. City Council may recall that last years graduation ceremony was so heavily attended that parking and safety concerns for participants were identified. At a post-event City Event Team meeting it was decided to inform the school's administration that any future graduation ceremonies at the Epicenter would need to include a limited seating, ticketed event format. Due to AB Miller's desire to not use the ticketed event format they have decided to move their event elsewhere. · Staff received a frantic telephone called from Ontario High School inquiring if the Epicenter Stadium would be available for June 16, 1999, for their high school graduation ceremony. It seems they were canceled, from what they thought was a firm booking, at the Ontario Convention Center. Staff is working with the school to attempt to address their needs. · ~ Kevin l~cArdle - C~~1opment Director Community Services Director RG:KM:KME