Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1999/04/21 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUN,CIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' i ....... ! 'm m I REG'ULAR MEETINGS 1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. April 21, 1999 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucarnonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councihnember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, Cio2 Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 .... ~ .............. ~ City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander Biane Curatalo __, Dutton ~.~ and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the week of April 25 - May 1 as "Victim's Rights Week." Presentation of a Proclamation to Hugh MacEachern and American Cable Entertainment for their efforts on behalf of the community and assistant with the 3rd Annual Library Telethon. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Cou;ncil from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: March 17, 1999 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/31/99 and 4/7/99 and Payroll ending 3114/99, for the total amount of $2,267,096.36. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 1999. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Summit Avenue Street Improvements located on the north side of Summit Avenue from East Avenue to 1000 feet of East Avenue, to be funded from Account No, 10-4637-9805. 14 City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 10. RESOLUTION NO. 99-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 1998/99 Appropriations. Approval to purchase one (1) F350 Extended Cab Utility Body Truck with Utility Trailer from Fairview Ford of San Bernardino, California, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in the amount of $53,616.40, funded from the Intergovernmental Services Account No. 72-4225-7045. Approval to purchase one (1) International Model 4900 4X2 Aerial Tower with utility body from Altec Industries, Inc. of Dixon, California, as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in the amount of $123,073.13 funded from the Intergovernmental Services Account No. 72-4225-7045. Approval of City co-sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All Star Game (CO 99-044) at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on June 9, 1999. Approval of a Request to Summarily Vacate an Easement for ingress and egress and related purposes north of Highland Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue -. APN: 225-161-19-33~32. RESOLUTION NO. 99-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS TO TRACT 13812 Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 98-17, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Arrow Highway, submitted by Mike Giuribino RESOLUTION NO. 99-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTAND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 98-17 17 21 122 123 124 129 135 137 139 City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 3 11. 12. 13. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15207, located on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue at San Marino Drive, submitted by Jerald B. Laird. RESOLUTION NO. 99-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15207 RESOLUTION NO. 99-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15207 Approval to appropriate $200,000 from Fund 20 (20-4532-9844), approve the award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-045) for the installation of park and paseo walkway lighting in Windrows Park and adjoining p,aseos to be funded from Fund 20. Approval of a Resolution approving the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (CO 99-046) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District establishing the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority to Facilitate the refinancing of various assessment districts and community facilities districts. RESOLUTION NO. 99-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JO~;NT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO FORM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY 140 142 143 146 147 149 City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 4 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Brown, Diven& Brewer Bond Counsel (CO 99-047) for legal services as bond counsel for the refinancing of various assessment districts and community facilities districts. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates (CO 99-048), assessment engineers, to prepare Engineer's Reports for' the refinancing of various assessment districts and community facilities districts. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates (CO 99-049) for municipal financial consultant services for the refinancing of various assessment districts and community facilities districts. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the Planning Center (CO 99-050) for the preparation of the General Plan Update 2000 and Environmental Impact Report not to exceed $473,351(to be funded from Account No. 01-4333-6028) for General Plan Amendment 99-03. Approval of Lease Amendment No. 13 between the City and Inland Valley Professional Baseball adjusting police security cost for the 1999 baseball season and to modify the security provision contained in Section 25 of the Lease. (Continued from April 7, 1999) Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract Map 15766, located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lane. RESOLUTION NO. 99-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15766 Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract Map 15926, located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pepperidge Lane, submitted by Mr'. Cecil Carney. RESOLUTION NO. 99-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT MAP 15926 151 153 154 155 157 161 162 164 165 City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 5 21. 22. 23. Approval to release the Maintenance Bonds for Tract Maps 13565- 1 through -4, located north of Wilson Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road. Approval to accept the 1997/96 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 98-029, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $235,746.63. RESOLUTION NO. 99-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1997/98 RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-029, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the widening of the corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 98-049, as complete, Release the Bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $235,746.63. RESOLUTION NO. 99-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WIDENING OF THE CORNER OF FOURTH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO~ 98-049 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 167 168 169 170 171 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 6 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. APN: 201-272-17 and 18. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSiESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the Development District Zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Residential for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. APN: 201-272-17 and 18 RESOLUTION NO. 99-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 272-17 AND 18 ORDINANCE NO. 600 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY, FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND 172 204 206 City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 7 AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201- 272-17 AND 18 CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 - A review of the Federally-required Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant Application, based on a new grant allocation of $959,000 and approximately $125,856 in reprogrammed funds. 209 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION OF QUAKE'S REQUEST FOR CITY TO WAIVE FEES AND SUBSIDIZE A PROPOSED FOUR-DAY BASEBALL CLINIC (Continued from April 7, 1999) CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMF~NT ,(~OMPANY (ACE) TO CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT II, LLC (CO 99-051 ) RESOLUTION NO. 99-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM:ONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE BY ACEC HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, TO CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT II, LLC 301 305 306 City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 8 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 2. Lions East and West Community Centers 3. Bear Gulch Park/Arbor Day 4. Central Park 5. City Hall B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teens 3. Youth Activities 4. Youth Sports 5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 6. Adult Sports 7. Senior Transportation Program 8. Trips and Tours 9. Human Services 10. Facilities 11. The Grapevine 12. Contract Classes 13. Community Wide Special Events 14. Park a Recreation Commission 15. Epicenter 312 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items wil! not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minu~tes per individual. City Council Agenda April 21, 1999 9 L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCHESTER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW :ROUTE; JERRY FULWOOD, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 15, 1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 17, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetin.q A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 17, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Jaymes Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Sam Spagnolo, Fire Engineer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a cash donation to the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA from the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters and Police Officers. Sam Spagnolo, Fire District, and Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department, presented the YMCA with a check in the amount of $5,175. Dianna Lee-Mitchell thanked the Fire and Police Departments for putting on the golf tournament and for the money that was raised for the YMCA. B2. Presentation of Certificates to Julia Wang and Kyle Jones for their participation in the Library Video "Our Favorite Place." Donna Bradshaw talked about the Library telethon held this past weekend. The library video, "Our Favorite Place" was also shown. Ms. Bradshaw distributed certificates to Julia Wang and Kyle Jones. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 2 C. COMMUNI~CAT!ONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Various personnel from the U.S. Army were present to talk about their recruiting program. Captain Jamison introduced the various staff present. Sergeant Raymond talked about what they can do for the community and for young adults that need direction for the future. Mayor Alexander inquired where the recruiter office was. Sergeant Raymond stated it is off of Mountain at 1271 7th Street in Upland. Sergeant Ducell talked about the benefits the Army offers and asked for the Council to help them get the word out about this opportunity. Mayor Alexander thanked them for coming to the meeting. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it is requested the following items be added to the agenda under "City Manager Staff Reports": H2. APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR INSTALLATION O:F PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 20 H3. CONSIDERATION OF COUNTY GENERAL PLAN POLICIES AMENDMENT - SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (REF. COUNTY APPLICATION NO. GPA/CW1-849N) MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Dutton to approve the addition of the above stated items to the agenda. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D 1. Approval of Minutes: February 17, 1999 March 3, 1999 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/24/99 and 3/3/99 and Payroll ending 2/18/99, for the total amount of $2,389,011.87. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 28, 1999. D4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Rocky's Pizza, Hong Hyo Sook & Hong Sung Kee, 9615 Foothill Blvd. D5. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Steer N Stein, Antonio Natcisco, Jr., Steven Vanzant, and Manuel Costa, 8348 Archibald. D6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 1998/99 ADA Access Ramps and Driveways Project to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards generally City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 3 located along Archibald Avenue from 6t~ Street to north of Base Line Rd., to be funded from Account Nos. 16-4637-9106, 10-4637-9804 and 32-4637-9804. RESOLUTION NO. 99-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AP'PROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "1998/99 ADA ACCESS RAMPS AND DRIVEWAYS CONSTRUCTION" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D7. Approval to accept the Redevelopment Agency's conveyance of real properties located at 7368 Archibald (Rancho Cucamonga Public Library), and 10.75 acres south of Foothill and east of Rochester (Sports Complex Expansion Parking Lot). RESOLUTION NO. 99-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING EXCESS REMNANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7368 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 99-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING EXCESS REMNANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL AND EAST OF ROCHESTER (SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION PARKING LOT) FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVEbOPMENT AGENCY D8. Government Code Section 34090 and the City's Records Retention Schedule. RESOLUTION NO. 99-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES D9. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, authorizing the City to obtain State Summary Criminal History information to expedite process of employment background investigations. RESOLUTION NO. 99-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO OBTAIN STATE SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION TO EXPEDITE PROCESS OF EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 4 D10. Approval to purchase one replacement Chevrolet Astro Van from Good Chevrolet of Alameda, California, through the State of California, Department of General Services, Procurement Division, 1999 Contract 1¢1-99-23-20, in the amount of $20,476.82, to be funded from Account #72-4245-7045. Dll. Approval to purchase ten (10) replacement Chevrolet Blazers and one (1) Chevy Express Passenger Van from Crest Chevrolet of San Bernardino, California, through a piggyback purchase agreement with the County of San Bernardino in the amount of $253,986.21, to be funded from Account #72- 4245-7045. D12. Approval to purchase one (1) Chevrolet Astro Van from Good Chevrolet of Alameda, California, through the State of California, Department of General Services, Procurement Division, 1999 Contract #1- 99-23-20, in the amount of $20,853.94, to be funded from Account #141-4451-7045. D13. Approval to purchase one (1) GMC Safari Cargo Van from Lahser GMC/Dodge of Woodland, California, through the State of California, Department of General Services, Procurement Division, 1999 Contract #1-99-23-20, in the amount of $18,70,0.46, to be funded from Account #141-4451-7045. D14. Approval of authorization for repla,cement purchase of four trucks from Hemborg Ford of Norco, California, in the amount of $153,977.57 and one from Fairway Ford Sales, Inc., of Placentia, California, in the amount of $46,009.25, funded from Fu;nd 72-4225-7045. D 15. Approval to accept offer of dedication of Lot "A" of Tract No. 13062 and forward the documents to the State of California (CALTRANS) for the construction of SR 30 Freeway. RESOLUTION NO. 99-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROADS D16. Approval of a drainage acceptance agreement for CUP 97-09, Bear Gulch, LLC, located at the southeast corner of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 99-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR BEAR GULCH, LLC D 17. Approval of a Resolution of Intention to Vacate portions of two alleys, generally within the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue and setting the date of the public hearing for April 7, 1999. RESOLUTION NO. 99-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE PORTIONS OF ALLEYS GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 5 D18. Approval to order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 98-32, located on the south side of Arrow Route east of the 1-15 Freeway, submitted by USL Parallel Products of California. RESOLUTION NO. 99-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERI,NG THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR98-32 (APN: 229- 121-10) D19. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's reports and setting of Public Hearing for May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 99-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AiND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990100 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. D20. Approval ofthe Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's report and setting ofthe Public Hearing for May 5, 1999, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1990/00 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). RESOLUTION NO. 99-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85), FOR THE FI~SCAL YEAR 1999t00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTI~NG ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 99-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) D21. Approval of the Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's reports and setting of the Public Hearing for May 5, 19.99, to levy the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 1990/00 for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 99-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990/00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8. D22. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 96- 26, located at the Northeast corner of Aspen and Laurel Streets, submitted by N & L Nilar Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 96-26 RESOLUTION NO. 99-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 96-26 D23. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Bucknam & Associates, Inc. (CO 99-030), to provide on-call technical services relating to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title II, in the amount of, but not to exceed, $20,000 per year, and appropriations of $15,000 from Account No. 10-4637-6028 and $5,000 from Account No. 20-4532-6028 for Fiscal Year 1998/99. D24. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a "Notice of Completion" for Improvements for DR 96-18, located on the south side of Sixth Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 99-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 9.6-18AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D25. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for Improvements for DR 96-22, Ioceted at 12320 Fourth Street, submitted by Heritage Bag Company, a Texas Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC I.MPROVEMENTS FOR DR 96-22, SUBMITTED BY HERITAGE BAG COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept Maintenance Bond, and file a "Notice of Completion" for Improvements for Tract 13565, submitted by Richmond American Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 99-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D27. Approval to accept the Library Expansion Project, Contract No. 98-068, as complete, release the bonds, and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $46,592.00. RESOLUTION NO. 99-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-068, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Items I1 and G2 were heard at this time, however the minutes will remain in the original order of the agenda. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 8 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT ANNUAL ,,,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1999r2Q00 - A review of the Federally-required Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, including the preliminary selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on a new grant allocation of $959,000 and approximately $165,000 in reprogrammed funds. Staff report by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Councilmember Dutton asked why the Rancho Cucamonga Library was not considered for receiving funding. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, stated he did not consider them because he felt there were other sources the library had to get money from. Deborah Clark, Library Director, talked about the budget for the library and the money they have available to them. She stated she felt they have tapped most of their available sources. She pointed out they are asking for $10,000 for the Back-to-Basics Program which is used to pay clerical and staff. She stated the adult literacy program has a grant they received for ¼ of what they originally asked for. Councilmember Williams asked Ms. Clark to explain the Back-to-Basics Program. Deborah Clark, Library Director, continued to explain how they work very closely with the schools to help the kids learn. Councilmember Biane asked about funding available for programs. Deborah Clark, Library Director, presented information on this. Councilmember Curatalo felt something should be done to give the Library the $10,000 they need for this program. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff is available to work with the City Council subcommittee to come up with the money that is needed for some of the programs mentioned. Councilmember Williams asked about the capital projects and the money shown for them. She asked if some of this money could be reallocated. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the amounts listed are just estimates, but that they can do a reallocation from here. He stated that he felt the Council should direct a subcommittee to work with staff and then bring this back to the Council for final approval. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Mary Gandell, Foothill Family Shelter in Upland, stated even though they are not in Rancho Cucamonga they do help families in Rancho Cucamonga. She stated all the money that is given to them is very important and needed for them to run the operation. She continued to talk about the services they provide. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 9 Bill Meyers, House of Ruth Board of Directors, talked about the programs they offer at the shelter. He thanked the Council for their support. Betty Davidill, Inland Mediation Board, talked about the services they provide and what they have to offer. Jack Tillman, West End Kids Club, talked about their program and what they offer. He thanked the Council for previous financial assistance they have provided. Dianna Lee-Mitchell, YMCA, talked about the program they offer and thanked the Council for their support in the past. Ron Bradshaw, Etiwanda Historical Society, thanked the Council for their support and particularly mentioned the Isle House relocation. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Dutton felt they should make. a subcommittee of the Council as suggested by Brad Buller, City Planner, to come up with some money for the Library Back-to-Basics program. ACTION: The Council concurred that Councilmembers Dutton and Biane would sit on this subcommittee. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AM:ENDING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING DAYTIME CURFEW REGULATIONS Staff report by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 598. ORDINANCE NO. 598 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND REVISING DAYTIME CURFEW REGULATIONS Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 598 for April 7, 1999. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. G2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, introduced Bill Rudell of Richards, Watson & Gershon. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 10 Mr. Rudell referred to the staff report in the agenda packet and made a presentation. Councilmember Williams asked if this is streamlining the ordinance and not specific to any certain cable franchises. She wanted to make sure this is only being done to streamline. Mr. Rudell stated the cable companies have reviewed this and are in favor of this. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, read the title of Ordinance No. 599. ORDINANCE NO. 599 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ORDINANCE AND AMENDING TITLE 7 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 599 for April 7, 1999. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ('CO 99-031 ) REGARDING WAIVING THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX INCREASE FOR BOOKING FEES Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager'~ Councilmember Biane also stated the Inland Empire Division of the League is working on legislation regarding this matter and should be voting on something tomorrow night. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to approve CO 99-031. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. H2. APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASE0 WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 20 Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Alexander stated he knew there were a lot of folks that are really ready for this. Councilmember Dutton pointed out that just because you add lighting does not mean someone is totally secure and that people still have to take precautions and be careful. RESOLUTION NO. 99-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 11 INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Dutton to approve Resolution No. 99-073. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. H3. CONSIDERATION OF COUNTY GENE,RAL PLAN POLICIES AMENDMENT - SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (REF. COUNTY APPLICATION NO. GPNCW1-849N) Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Councilmember Dutton stated he has concerns with what is going on in this area. He stated he would like the County to reconsider their position and support this. Councilmember Biane stated the Inland Empire Division of the League will also be working on this matter. Councilmember Williams stated she concurred with this Resolution. She continued to talk about the annexation process and what is involved in this. She felt the City was trying to assert the standards it is use to. RESOLUTION NO. 99-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE/GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICYAMENDMENTS AFFECTING SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 99-072. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Sandra Jacobs, Mayor Pro Tem for the City of El Segundo, made the presentation on this item. Councilmember Curatalo stated that on the Los Angeles plan, Ontario is allocated at 15% growth. He asked what the regional plan indicated for Ontario. Dennis Zane, Gladstein & Associates, stated the figure of 15% growth is for the Inland Empire. He stated most of this is for Ontario, with other parts of it at March and Norton. He stated most of the new growth and air commerce is for LAX. He felt LAX was trying to "gobble up" most of the opportunities. Mayor Alexander stated SAN BAG did adopt a similar Resolution to the one that is proposed tonight. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO. 99-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A REGIONAL AIRPORT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 99-071. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 12. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Stadium 2. Eftwanda Creek Park 3. Bear Gulch Park/Arbor Day 4. Hermosa Park 5. Central Park 6. All City Parks 7. Trails 8. City Hall A. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teens 3. Youth Activities 4. Youth Sports 5. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 6. Adult Sports 7. Proposed Boxing Program 8. Senior Transportation Program 9. Trips and Tours 10. Human Services 11. Facilities 12. The Grapevine 13. Contract Classes 14. Community Wide Special Events 15. California Park and Recreation Society Conference 16. Park and Recreation Commission 17. Epicenter Report received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. City Council Minutes March 17, 1999 Page 13 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn the meeting in memory of Philo Biane and to adjourn to executive session to discuss Property Negotiatio~ns per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, negotiating party, regarding Terms of Payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ** I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA LIST ~ WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 03-31-99 C98/99) ! ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RUN DATE: 03/31/99 PAGE: VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. 2114T BRIDGES, KATHRYN N. 1121 XNDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS 3349 SCAG 31353 JAUREGO1, MARIO i A A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.,INC. 5118 A R M A INTERNATXONAL 51!8 A R M A INTERNATIONAL 5118 A R M A INTERNATIONAL 2732 ABe LOCK SMXTHS 21159 ACTION TRIANGLEs, INC. 21160 AIR SHO~ERS & PASS THgUS UNLTO,[NCo 21161 AIRITE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 1826 a[ RTOUCH CELLULAR kLL gELDZNG ALPHAGRAPH ~CS ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. O~ CHECK# OVERLAP RECREATTON REFUND 137180 <<< 137181- 137516 MAINTENANCE 137517 <<< 137518- 137623 >>) REGIONAL GENERAL aSSEMBLY MTG 137624o <<< 137625- 137897 >)> MEETING 137 8980 <<¢ 137899- 137900 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MISC MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND CELLULAR PHONE BXLLINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND ~AZNTENANCE REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES SER V Z CE/SUPPL ZE S ~FZCE S~LZES 4394 AMERICAN DESK MANUFACTURXNG COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVXCE 21163 A#ERXCAN OFFICE ~ BUSINESS EQUIPMNT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO APWA MEMBERSHIP SUPPLIES & SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVXCES BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND VISA MONTHLT BILLINGS LEASE AGREEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUND VEHICLE NAINTENANCE HA XNTENANCE SUPPLXES OFFICE SUPPLIES NAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES OEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUNO LIBRARY SUPPLXES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MEMBERSHIP DUES OEPOSIT REFUNO MAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES OFFXCE/MAXNTENANCE EQUXPMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FACILITY RENTAL BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUNO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 22 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATXON 5321 APOLLO WOOD RECOVERYp INC. 5243 ARLY SOUND 6100 ARROW RESTAURANT E~UIPMENT 667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 5~,26 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF UPLAND 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 21164 AUSTXN-FOUST ASSOCIATESp INC. 402 AUTO RESTO RATORS 4102 8 & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 4441 BEST BUY COo, INC. 41 BISHOP COMPANY 2!171 BDLOUC ~ BARRY 21147 BRIDGES, KATHRYN No 4369 BROOART BOOKS 21165 BUTE PLUMBING XNC., 4803 C A P P 0 54 C P CONSTRUCTION 4735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 1223 CALSENSE 21166 CAMPBELL CONCRETEw INC. 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 1270 CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 21167 CHINA HUT 3118 CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSIDN 21168 CITATION ELECTRIC, INC. 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. 1379O1 137902 137903 137904 137905 137906 137907 137908 137909 137910 137911 137912 137913 137914 137915 137916 137917 137918 137919 137920 137921 137922 137923 137924 137925 137926 137927 137928 137929 137930 137931 137932 137933 137934 137935 137936 137937 137938 137939 137940 137941 137942 137943 16.57- 65050- 65.00 300.00 117096 150000 150o00 140.00 637.73 32.92 7093 9.90 244.25 6.14 195o00 164-64 70.04 308.99 30260030 162000 100.00 5.63 400.00 1,056.48 2,106.09 5,000000 3070SO 36.00 497092 772.14 258056 319o89 500000 16057 2,026034 36000 60.00 l,OO0.00 730o15 72079 7020 890.23 171050 21.94 1,487.76 10.36 236.90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD; 03-31-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 03/31/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEm DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARRo ANT. ~ CNECKJ OVERLAP 6179 CITY OF CERRITOS RECREATION REFUND 137944 397.48 74 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES # 137945 ~16.44 465~ CLAYTON, JANICE CCPOA NEETING 1379~6 11169 COLONELL BANKER BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137947 57°89 1470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 1379~8 28o14 21170 CONSTANT FIRE PROTECTION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137949 6.45 930 CORONA CLAY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 137950 942.81 ¢¢( 137951 - 137952 85 CUCANONGA CO WATER DZST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS J 137953 2511 D A R E AHERICA D.A.R.E. MATERIAL 137954 1478 DAPPER TIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 137955 6145 DAVIS, SAH CONTRACT SERVZCES 137956 550°50 347 DAY-TIMERS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES J 137957 108.94 36628 DE FRANK'S HEATING ~ AIR 6USINESS LICENSE REFUND 137958 54.71 6168 DEBLZELIXt #ZKE CAPZO MEETING 137959 36629 DEER CREEK SHOPPING CENTER BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137960 78.11 ~6634 DEPARTMENT DR PUBLIC ADMiNISTRATiON DUES AND SUSSCRZPTZON 137961 1~o00 3~76 OIVERSIFIED ADVERTISING NOVELTIES OFFICE SUPPLIES I 137961 397.30 ~205 DYNA~C GRAPHICS, iNC. OFFICE EQUiPmENT 1~796~ 5~.50 36630 EASTgOOD INSURANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137964 9o10 3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 137965 800.22 5767 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC. PERSONNEL SERVICES 1379~6 4914 EXCLUSIVE ENAGES OFFICE SUPPLIES 137967 5917 FASTENAL COMPANY ~AINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 137968 503.68 28~0 FORD OF UPLAND~ INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 137969 9~ FORO PRINTING & mAILING, INC MA[NTENANCE ~ OPERATIONS 137970 747°93 36631 FUNERAL PLANNING SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 137971 53000 5288 GARRETT CONCo CORING & SA~ING~ XNC. mAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 137972 864.00 36635 GLENN, ~ILLIE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 137973 77.00 36631 GOLOEN HANGER BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137974 ZO.00 5955 GOLOEN WEST DISTRIBUTING RECREATION SUPPLIES 137975 $7°00 1870 GOMEZ, R~CK RE~m&URSEMENT 137976 87.32 1145 GONSALVES & SON~ dOE Ao LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 137977 650 GRAINGER, W.~. mAINTENANCE SUPPLZES 137978 Z15.39 36621 GRANLZBAKKEN CONFERENCE CENTER REGISTRATION FEES 137979 461o00 36617 GRIFFIN, OEBBIE OEPOSZT REFUND 137980 200°00 ((¢ 137981 - 137981 137 GTE CALIFDRNZA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 137982 3e393o72 36633 GUY EVANS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 137983 13.84 &6Z HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. EQUIPMENT HAINTENANCE e 137984 310o36 31346 HEALTH GROUP PSYCHOLOGICAL SERo INC BUSINESS L~CENSE 137985 46.00 31~58 HECKER~ DONNA RELEASE OF OEPOSIT 137986 500°00 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES J 137987 3,335.83 3633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGmS& EDUCATION MONTHLY SERVICES 137988 651o00 1234 HOSEmAN mAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137989 139.81 ~95 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS~ INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 137990 3Z9o98 834 ! C H A NEmBERSHIP DUES 137991 442.65 103 I C m A RETZRENENT TRUST-AS7 DEFERRED COMP 137992 673.00 3276 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS mAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 137993 702.56 5882 ~CNA RETZRE#ENT TRUST - 401 01 · 13799* 6,004.83 31351 INFORmal[oN TECHNOLOGY GROUP OFFICE SUPPLIES 137995 37.30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 03-31-99 (98/993 gUN DATE: 03/J1/99 PAGE: VENOOR NaME ITEM OESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. ~ CHECKa O¥~RLAP 31338 INLANO AREOSPACE SUPPLY CO BUSINESS LICENSE 13799b 62°05 31342 INLAND EMPIRE F~RE AND SAFETY, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 137997 8.05 3452 INTRAVAIA ROCK ~ SAND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 137998 100.00 612 JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 137999 Z6.15 31351 J~ & R GRAPHIC SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE 138000 13.38 31348 KALPINS, RUTH I- D.M.D., MMSC BUSINESS LICENSE 138001 55°69 4128 KELLY EQUIPMENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES ~ 138002 5894 KELLY, KRISTY RECREATION 138003 100o00 *037 KENCO ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 138004 8S.37 3~337 KENT ELECTRIC BUSINESS LICENSE 138005 31341 K:MBALL, R.J. CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS LICENSE 138006 9°00 1&9 KING, L.O. PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES 138007 4,530°00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 138008 1,780o12 6090 KONG, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNU 138009 A80oO0 19~ LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 138010 40,~83o63 31356 LAKKEES, ROBERT RELEASE FO FUNDS 138011 195 LANCE, SOLL ~ LUNGHARD AUgIT SERVICES e 138012 17e623o00 31~57 LANOCRAFTERS RELEASE OF D£POSIT 138013 5380 LIFE ASSES! MEDICAL SUPPLIES 138014 69-86 4941 LUCKETT ROOFING CO. MAINTENANC~ 138015 1062 M C I TELECOHMUN!CA?IONS TELEPHONE SERVICES # 138016 1,395.15 2S0 MARTINEZ TOWING AND AUTOMOTIVE TOWING SERVICES 138017 5375 MASTER 8UILOING SPECIALTIES. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 138018 6,00&.00 ~907 MASTER-SORT, INC. PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 138019 98.36 3871 MATT'S HAROWARE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 138020 23.39 31344 MCCARTM~ BROTHERS COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE 138021 31349 MERRY MAIDS BUS~NESS LICENSE 138022 27°50 3860 MOBILE MINI, INC. STORAGE SUPPLISS 138023 131.46 313~3 MORTON INTERNATIONAL~ INC. BUSINESS LICENSE 138024 197.S1 5987 ~OUNTAIN FRESH ORINKING WATER SYS. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138025 37o00 ?44 NATIONAL OEFERREO OEFERRED COMP 138026 5301 NEW WEST SIGNAL MAINTENANCE # 138027 5,968o65 ((( 138028 - 138028 523 OFFICE OEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 138029 235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 138030 29Z1 P A P A PESTICIDE APPLICATORS SEMINAR # 138031 90.00 31345 P G AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS LICENSE 138032 20.00 1441 PACIFIC BELL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 138033 108.50 5343 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138034 709.86 31355 PAGE, ANGEL RECREATION 138035 37.50 5409 PARTSMASTER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 138036 432o57 487 PATTON SALES CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138037 300.95 757 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 138038 92o31 31354 PERALTA, MINA NgNTAND RECREATION 138039 26.00 31339 PETCO I 556 BUSINESS LICENS6 138040 16.70 6148 PIRON, SHAUN SE~S REGULATIONS WORKSHOP 138041 269.00 6089 PITTS, LISA RECREATION REFUNO 138042 791 PHI/DELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 138043 1,144.80 255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES a 138044 8~846o10 1949 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 1380~5 31350 POSTNET BUSINESS LICENSE 138046 6o91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 03-31-99 (98/99) VENDOR NAME RUN DATE.' 03/31/99 PAbE: 4 ; ~;'= ;~;~;;;;;;~3~ .................................................................... T WARR NO WARR. AMTo 3ZB6 31340 65 6156 3663 418 11369 70 '130 5665 5914 11370 11371 276 11380 301 132 1105 3896 69Z 319 1~32 11372 836 3942 11373 4558 4558 11374 4788 3437 11375 2210 5285 1103 11376 400Z 11377 4577 60 99 5140 11378 11379 509 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL PRIORITY ONE MECICAL TRANSPORT,INC. PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY R & R GARAGE DOORS R & T SPECIALTYt INC. R M A GROUP RANCHO aCN CLEANERS RANCHO CUCAHONGA CHANGER R8M LOCK & KEY SERVICE REGULATION COMPLTANCEt INC. REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES RIGHTWAY ~PTIOE ~[VERS~DE BLUEPeINT ROSEBURROUGM TOOLS~ INC. SAFEL~TE GLASS CORP. SALAZAR~ E STELA SAN OXEGO ROTARY BROOM ~Oe INC SEAL FURNITURE ~ SYSTEMS SENECHAL~ CAL S~R SPEEOY SO CAL~F GAS COHPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SUN, DDS, JENNY C- TARGET TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TERMINTX INTERNATIONAL P THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLYt INC U S GUARCS CO.° IMCo U S GUAROS CO.t INto U.S. E~UXPMENT CO., INC UNDERGROUNO SVC. ALERT OF SO. CALIF UNZFZRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNZTOG RENTAL SERVZCES~ INC. VARNEY° GARY VIKING TIRE V~ST~ PAINT gAL-MART ~192Z BASTE MANAGEMENT MATER STORE ~ELLS FARGO GUARO SERVICES RESFERN H~GHMAY PRODUCTS~ INC ~ITAKER ~ RICHARD ~ILCOX SALES CO. NILSHIRE ONCOLOGY ~EDICAL GROUPs INC gOODBENO APARTMENTS XEROX CO RPgRATION ~ CHECK° OVERLAP HEOICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE BUSINESS LICENSE <(( 138049 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND D.A.R.E. SUPPLIES SOIL TESTING SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS MEMBERSHIP MEETING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS PRINTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SERVICE AND SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNbS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE MAINT SUPPLIES O~FICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT OFPICE SUPPLIES M~NTHLY GAS ~ILLS 135071 - MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL MAINT SUPPLIES MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS SECURITY GUARD SERVICE SECURITY GUARD SERVICE BUS~NESS LICENSE REFUNDS UN~ERGROUNO SERVICE ALERT UNIFORM SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS MINI E~UIPMENT MEETING VEHICLE SUPPLIES MAINT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS WASTE MANAGEMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS SECURITY GUARD SERVICES HAUNT SUPPLIES LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO SACTO ENGINEERING SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS BUS~NESS LICENSE REFUNUS COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVIC~ 138047 65,77Z.Z4 138048 90.00 138049 >>> 138050 I ~705.19 138051 70.00 138052 6Z5o54 138053 501.00 13805~ lZoO0 138055 200.00 138056 130o16 138057 3~340.95 138058 2t598.93 138059 Z3.40 138060 18.87 1380~1 1,063.17 138062 484.34 138063 331oZ2 1380~4 Z9.00 138065 836,284.42 138066 1Z4.99 138067 344.32 138068 148.50 138069 25.34 138070 lt199o88 138079 >)> 138080 Z2,822.32 138081 4.86 138082 98.05 138083 286.51 138084 309.00 138085 7.50 138086 Z,027.34 138087 Z8o15 138088 5I.Z2 138089 212.75 138090 411.Z5 138091 Z4~38 138092 150.74 138093 800.40 138094 826096 138095 23°00 138096 303~88 138097 11.70 138098 1,177.69 138099 1,300.00 138100 300.00 138101 1~616.25 138102 23.00 138103 693.31 138104 1~192.B* TOTAL 1~1Z~,303.46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST OF gARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04-07-99 C98/99} RUN VENDOR NAME ITE~ DESCRIPTION ~ARR NO ~ARR. AHT. 5338 SAN BERN~ CITY OF TELETHaN SUPPORT 5907 TDLSTOYt PETER TRAVEL ADVANCE 1021 YORK INDUSTRIES G~AFFIT! REHOV~R 5119 BENSON~ HAURY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1870 GOMEZ~ RICK REZMBURSEHENT 31368 OMN! ROSEN HOTEL ~ESERVATZON 31371 10 1 1732 T 5509 21171 14,30 6052 Z199 310 1437 1135 20875 6142 4,323 5119 6131 1247 4833 21176 1ZTH ANNUAL N.D.OoAo CONFERENCf: A F, R TIRE SERVICE A A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.~INC. ABC LOCK SMITHS ABLETRONICS ACO SANITATION AIR CO~ROLLED ENV~RONHENTS AHASON~ PAT ~NERZCAN CABLE ENTERTAZNHENT kRERZC~ F~RST A*~D E ~ETY ~RROM ~A!LER SUPPLIES ~RROM TRUCK BODIES E EQUIP &SSOCZATED GROUP~ THE AUTO AYR~St CATHY BASSETT-SHITH~ TERRI BELLSO~H ~RELESS DATA BENSON~ HAURY BEST BUY CO.~ BZLZNG~L PUBLICATIONS CO.~ THE BLAKE P~PER CO.~ BOOKS ~ TAPE~ BRIONES~ ENERLZNE BRODART BOOKS BROMN~ JANELLE CALIFORNIA LZTERACY~, ZNCo CALIFORNZA PRESERVATION CALOLYMPZC SAFETY CMAVEZ~ ~ZCHAEL CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS CITY RENTALS CLARIDN HOTEL COLLEGE BOARD~ THE COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COMNUNTTY SPARKS COHPUTERLA ND CgRONA CLAY CONPANY ~369 21174 2559 5442 110 4735 5714 5958 74 20802 31373 Z4T 0 31371 643 930 METTZNG VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES E~UXPMENT ~ENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TUITION REIMBURSEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING FEE SURPLiES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE R~CR~ATZON REFUND RECREATION REFUND COHMUNZCATlON CHARGE INSTRUCTOR PATMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES EUSZNESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION LZ~RARY SUPPLIES RECREATION CALBO ABM MEETING MEPSERSHIP DUES CPF 1995 MEETING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MILEAGE RE~MBU£SEMENT LIBRARY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES RESERVATIONS LIBRARY SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP # 133862~ 2,335.00- 133863- 137121 137122~ 162.50- 137113- 137628 137619~ 33.13- 137620 - 237655 137656~ 336.00- 137657- 138104 138105~ 250°00 138106~ 581.40 138107- 138108 138109 138110 341.31 138111 58.90 138112 9.70 138113 35.50 13811& 131.68 138115 138116 77.00 # 138117 803.56 138118 39.48 138119 279.50 138120 45.5Z 138121 95.63 ~ 138122 1,555.00 I 138123 114.95 138114 149~50 138125 39.68 # 138126 3,512.05 138127 336.00 138128 6.45 ~ 138129 134.57 ~ 138130 108.14 · 138131 16.17 138132 12.50 138133 - 13813& e 138135 3,892.52 138136 100.00 138137 150.00 138138 7E.00 138139 35.00 1381~0 134.93 138141 20.15 138142 6.50 I 138143 499.81 138144 79.00 238145 34.&9 e 138146 345°80 138147 100.00 # 138148 138149 941.81 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 0&-07-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 04/07/99 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMTo 4316 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 5373 COST CONTROL ASSOCIATES MAINTENANCE 21175 COULONt SHARX RECREATION 85 239 6145 60 36638 2110 839 S809 4109 5744 3875 1962 36636 3364 5137 36637 4856 3088 5918 3356 5Z88 463Z 3388 3827 137 4486 5699 5723 31360 158 6183 ' 161 4188 2315 31359 175 5654 6081 4128 149 6090 4982 172 193 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST O & K CONCRETE CO DAVISt SAM OELTA DENTAL OEMINGp R.D. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK OI EYERICH-POST COMPANY OIRECT EOGEp INC. DIRECT TV OUNN-EOMAR DS CORPORATION DURA ART STONE ~MLENBURG, JACKIE EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS E#PXRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE EROILER~ GERDA FEOERAL JOBS DIGEST FIRST STOP MOTORSP~RT$~ INC. FLORENCE FILTER CORPORATION GARCIAo VIVIAN GARRETT CONC. CORING t SAkING~ INC. GLOBAL TELExDATA CORPORATION GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTSt INC. GREEN ROCK POWER EGUIPHENT GTE CALXFORNIA GUAROXAN HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COHPANY MEAD GEAR HOLLANOE R~ RENEE HOLLXOAY ROCK CO.~ INC. MOLT°$ AUTO ELECTRIC HOUSEHOLD BANK~ HOYT LUMBER CDo~ X O BURR INLAND ¥HOLESALE NURSERY JEFFRIESp ALICE JOBS AVAILABLE K&PCO RANBOARD KELLY EQUX P#ENT KXNG~, KONG. SOPN AK KORANDA CONSTRUCTZ ON KOZLOVZCHt DEBBIE LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACT SERVICES DENTAL INSURANCE REGISTRATION FEES CLASS 'Am LICENSE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE EQUIPNENT SUBSCRIPTION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES R~CREATt~ REFUNO OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVZCES RECREATION REFUND SUBSCRIPTION VEHICLE ~ZNTENANCE KAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAINTENANCE SLIPPLIES PARTS ~ XNSTALLATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS MEDICAL PREMIUM RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES RECREATION REFUND NAZNTENANC~ SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SLIPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION ADVERTISEMENTS LIBRARY SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO VEHICLE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND C.O.B.G. INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 138150 43.11 df 138151 187.89 138152 90.00 138153- 138153 ~ 138154* 2.862.90 138155 523.67 138156 559.50 138157 23,941.44 138158 180.00 138159 64.00 8 138160 526.07 138161 229.97 13816Z 12.44 138163 24.95 ~ 138164 100o86 ~ 138165 41234.58 138166 12o50 138167 138168 21830.50 138169 35°00 138170 125.00 138171 150.00 dt 138172 474.19 138173 ZO.TT # 138174 1,728.00 138175 50.00 # 138176 17~$09.00 II 138177 702.04 138178- 138178 I! 138179 2~848.57 138180 659.00 138181 169.60 f 138182 141.65 138183 15.00 8 138184 204.24 138185 84.65 138186 40.00 138187 24.35 138188 345.89 138189 48°49 138190 47.00 138191 28.00 138192 23.,19 138193 I~804ogI 138194 40.21 138195 81195.52 138196 480.00 d 138197 1~858o00 138198 36.00 138199 20,483.83 138200- 138203 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF ~ARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04-07-99 C98/99) RUN OATE: 04/07/99 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION gARR NO NARRo ANT. 321 LANDSCAPE ~EST~ INCo LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 31173 LENIJAN~ SHARON RECREATION 4649 LINGO ~NOUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE 31363 LOONZS~ SANDY RECREATZO~ 31369 LOPEZ~ SPRING REIMBURSEMENT 31365 LOPEZ~ SUSANNE RECREATION 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTLo CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES 31'56 LU'S LI~HTHOUSE~ INC. OIL ANALYSIS 3136~ LYLEt PATRICKA RECREATION 600 LYNCH~ JAMIE RECREATION SUPPLIES 386 LYON COot WZLLZAM REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS 31361 NANZANO, CARMEN RECREATION 31367 MATMY~ JIM RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 5149 RCCLZNTON TRUCKING CO.~INC~ d.C. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 5652 MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 3316 MR T°S Z4-HRo TONING TOWING 5793 M?ERS T~RE MAINTENANCE SUPPLI~ES 2246 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 313T0 NAPA CITY-COUNTY LIBRARY LIBRARY 6137 NATZONJd. SAFETY COUNCIL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES S~T3 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 523 4327 31362 4904 818 2987 6148 4554 608g 30936 693 3500 31366 ,251 345 Z64 11381 2257 11382 545 ~665 5618 626 261 150 5338 11383 OFFICE DEPOT ORANGE SPORTING GOODS OSBERGt DON OTTw LAURA PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS PIRON; SHAUN PXTASSX~ PETER J. PXTTS~ LISA POTTER t MELZSSA POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO.~ ZNCo PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION PUBLIC RETIREMENT dOURNAL~ THE R L R AUTOMOTIVE R O 0 EGUXPNENT CO RALPMS GROCERY COMPANY RAMIREZ~ RACHEL RAUL"S AUTO TRZMt INC. READER°S CHAXR~ THE REO gZNG SHOE STORE REGULATION CONPLZ&NCE~ INC. RXCHARDS~ NATSONt ~ GERSHON ROBLES~ MAUL P-t SR. SAN BERN COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFO SAN BERN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. SAN BERN~ CXTY OF SAN LUIS OBZSPO DOitNTOgM ASSOC OFFICE SUPPLIES 72 DOZEN SOFTBALLS RECREATION INSTRUCTOR SNR.EXERCZSE CLASS .CONCRETE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE SEMS REGULATIONS ~DRKSHOP ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT RECREATION REFUND RECREATION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES MEETING VEHZCLE i~&XNTtSUPPLZES&SERVZCE MAINT SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATZON REFUNDS VEHICLE REPAIRS L~ERART SUPPLIES SAFETY BOOTS TRAZNXNG SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES TIRE REPAIR PRINTXNG & MAIL SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES T~LETHON SUPPORT VIDEO PACKAGE :~ CHECK# OVERLAP g 136204 137~4Z0o76 138205 52~00 8 138206 11~723~21 138207 45.00 138208 85.60 138209 35.00 ~ 136210 401.77 ~ 138211 166.90 138Z12 4.00 138213 31.62 138214 5,100.00 138215 50.00 136216 500.00 136217 971.56 6 138218 299.60 ~ 138219 237.50 138220 Z74.55 13622t - 138221 # 1367.22 680.65 1387.23 449°00 138224 447.25 138225 136226 - 139226 8 138227 1~406.75 138228 3 ~64Z o38 138229 50.00 $ 138230 490.00 138231 5°24 ~ 138232 1~09.5.23 138233 329.00 138Z34 1,510.00 136235 120.00 138236 150.00 t 138237 ~ 188.28 139238 521.24 138239 150.00 138240 464.73 138241 Z4.74 136242 44.95 138Z43 45.00 $ 138244 166.88 138245 6.44 138Z46 415.62 138247 4,660.05 138248 - 138248 >)) $ 138249 54,741.34 138250 5Z.50 138251 138~Z 60~650.00 t 138253 2,670.00 138254 108.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LiST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 04-07-93 (98/99) RUN DATE: 04/07/99 PAGe: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ~ARR NO WARR. ANT. ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 5088 SANTA FE SPRINGSt CITY OF LITERACY PROGRAM e 138255 2,588°00 6162 SCHECHTMAN CONSTRUCTZONe INC. REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE 138256 9~07.00 4350 SCHNEIDERWENTt KAREN LIBRARY SUPPLIES 138257 27o00 11384 SEGO~ dEAN RECREATION REFUNDS 138258 47.00 11385 SELECCIONES READER°S OIGgST LIERARY SUPPLIES 138259 Z7.a6 351 SIGN SHOP~ THE MAZNT SUPPLIES ~ 138260 133o86 11386 S!MAC CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OEPOSIT REFUND 138261 500o00 692 SIR SPEEDT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 138262 983°89 1327 SMART E FINAL OAT CAMP SUPPLIES I 138263 319 SO CAL~F GAS COMPANY MONTHLY GAS ~LLS 138264 6~1~2B 5761 SOROPTIMZSTt INT BANQUET e 138265 50.00 ((( 138266 - 138271 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON P~NTHLY ELECTRIC ~ZLLS S 138272 31~369o$Z 528~ STERICYCLE, INC. SHARPS PROGRAM e 138273 211o7S 4?33 SUNRISE FORO AUTO SERVICE ~ SUPPLIES I 13827~ 98.81 336 SURVEYORS SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 138275 388.98 11387 SWEENETm JANA RECREATION R~FUNOS 138276 68°00 4445 T & G ROOFING SERVICE & SUPPLIES 138277 1Z$.00 6185 TEAGAROEN~ MARY RECREATION REFUND 138278 45.57 11388 TEXACO REFINING AND ~ARKETZNG PEteHIT DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1~8~79 1~000.00 1919 TONARK SPORTS iNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138280 55.99 ~873 TROPHY CENTER OF ALTA LCMA RECREATION SUPPLIES ~ 138281 1~961.05 4558 U S GUARDS CO., INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVZC~ 138282 le025o03 4206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 1ST AIC KITS # 138~83 280.95 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE e 13828& 43.17 2682 UNITEO STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 138285 4~500.00 489 UPLANO~ CITY OF MONTHLY MATER ~1LL~NG 138286 11389 VASQUEZ, R~TA RECREATION REFUNDS 138287 60.00 499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - CCA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE ~ILLING 138288 9~307-83 1103 VISTA PAINT MAtNT SUPPLI£S 138289 ~VZoZO 4?8 ~ARREN E CODe CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS 138290 154o00 213 MAXIE~ RLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES ~ 138291 6~209o07 4577 WELLS FARG~ GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES e 138Z92 2~Z81.21 4331 ~EST END Y~CA FILES CRTLY REV~E~ e 138293 150o00 6099 ~HITAKERe RICHARD LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO 5ACTO # 13829& ZIZ ~ZLLOAN ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 138295 2~71aoZZ 11390 ~RIGHT~ DAVID g RAND~' PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 138296 500.00 '509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHZNE SUPPLiES/SERVICE # 138297 1~063o50 348 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY VEHICLE MAiNT SUPPLIES 138298 58.70 TOTAL City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 1999 Investments Cerlificates of Deposit - Bank Local Agency Investment Funds Federal Agemy I~es - Coupon Treesury Sec~ 'nfies. Coupon TOtal Investments and Averages Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments Total Eam|ng~ Currant Year vetage Daily Balance mes C rost Tr~er Par Value 7,310,532.20 27,999,719,82 56,515,000.00 2,000,000.00 84,324 35 93,909,576.37 1,104,953,75 96,014,630.12 March 31 Month Ending 452,439.17 93,8!5,864.69 6.68% Date Market Value 7,310,532.20 27,999,719,82 56,521,633.00 2,010,00000 88,23177 93,930, t 16.79 1,104,953.75 95,036,070.54 Fiscal Year To Date 4,054,57900 89,402.842.$9 6.04% Book % of Days to YTM 360 YTM 365 Value Portfolio Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv. 7,310,532.20 778 366 2t2 5194 5 266 27,999,719.82 29.82 1 I 5139 5 210 56,509,30310 60 18 1,705 1,376 5 ~98 6 081 1,996,250.00 2. t2 728 487 5400 5.475 79,935.07 008 7,266 2,915 9 461 9 593 93,895,740.19 100.00% 1,076 858 5.669 5.748 Da~s to YT~A 360' "YTM 365 Term Maturffy Equiv. Equiv. 1 973 2 000 1,104,953 75 96,000,693.94 1,076 858 5.669 5.748 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 7, 1998, A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-lnteractive Data Corporation pricing service, Run Date 04/12/1999 - 16:01 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF PM1) SyrnRept V5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 1999 Page 2 cusIP Investment # la!uer Certificates of Deposit - Bank 243-954752 01023 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 6385X 1KW9 01040 NATIONSBANK NA 6509~28649 f~J4 01021 SANWA 01041 SANWA Subtotal and Average 8,026,209.62 Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average 28,870,687.56 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Average Purchaae Balance Date Par Value 31331RAA3 00988 31331RDX0 00996 31331RMS1 01002 3133IRMA0 01004 31331 RUG8 01022 31331HRC3 01027 3t331RQ65 01036 31331R2Y0 01042 313395YK5 00989 3133MOTU5 00997 3133M2US4 0 t 003 3133M2TM9 01005 3133M4HG1 01019 3133M6NE4 01035 3133M75D4 01038 3133M86L3 01043 3134AILB4 00994 3134A1H45 01000 3134A2PN2 01030 3134A2XJ2 01033 3134A2N20 01037 31364CRP5 00981 31384CJ56 00992 313~4FC33 01016 31364FG96 01018 31364GBE8 01032 Run Oete: 04/12/1999 - 16 01 Market Value 06/09/1998 2,000,000 00 2,000,000 00 03/1111999 2,000,000.00 2,000,00000 05/26/t998 1,500,000 00 t.500.000.00 03/16/1999 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 7,310,532.20 7,310,532.20 27,999.719.82 27,~9~,7t9.82 27,999.719,82 27,~,719.82 Book Value Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date 2,000,000 00 5 400 5 400 69 0~/09/1999 2,000,00000 5100 5100 347 03/13/2000 t,500.000 00 5.400 5400 55 05/26/1999 1,810,532 20 4 900 4900 349 03t15!2000 7,310,532.20 5.194 212 27,999.719 82 27,999,719.82 03/27/1997 2,000,000.00 2.023,80000 2,000,000 00 07!t7tt997 2.000.000 00 Z042.600 O0 1,999,375 00 0110711998 1,000,000.00 1.005,000 00 1.000,000 00 01106/1998 2.000.000.00 2,007,600.00 2,000,000.00 0512711998 2,000,000 00 2.003,200 00 t .999,375 00 08/06/1998 1.515,000,00 1,518.333.00 1,514,303 10 12/15/1998 2,000,000.00 1,969,400.00 2,000,000.00 03/10/1999 3.000,000 00 2.992,500 00 3,000,00000 04/02/1997 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,00000 07/30t1997 1,000,000 00 1,004.700 00 1,000,000 00 01/0~/1998 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000 00 12/30t1997 1,000,00000 1,001.900 00 1,000,000 00 05/25/1996 2,000,000 00 2,001,800 00 2,000,000 00 12/08/1998 2,000,000.00 1.971,800 00 2.000,000.00 01/21/1999 t ,000,000.00 984.700.00 1,000,000.00 03/23/1999 3,000.000 00 3.000,000 00 3,000,000 00 06/25/1997 3,000,000.00 3,032,700.00 3,000,000 00 t0122/1997 2,000,000.00 2,023,200.00 2,000,000.00 05/2011998 2,000,000.00 1,996.200.00 2,000,000 00 1112411998 2,000,000.00 1.985,000.00 2,000,000 00 01t14/1999 2,000,000 00 1,986,200.00 2,000,000.00 11/2911996 2,000,000.00 2,003,800.00 2,000,000.00 05/05/1997 2,000,000.00 2,034,400.00 2,000,000,00 05/O4/1998 3,000,00000 3,021,60000 3.000,000 00 05/19/1998 2,000.00000 2,001,20000 2,000,000.00 10106/1998 2,000,00000 1,973,20000 2,000,000 00 5 210 5 t39 1 5.139 I 6 620 6 529 1,091 03/2712002 6 240 8 162 1203 07/t7/2002 6 330 6243 1,377 01/0712003 6 220 6 135 1,376 0110612003 6 290 6 21~ 1,517 05/27/2003 5 500 5 472 t24 08/03~t999 5660 5 582 1,719 12/1512003 5930 5 849 1,811 03/1612004 6540 6450 732 04/0212001 § 544 0 454 1,2t6 07130t2002 6.230 6 t45 1.376 0tt0612003 6110 6026 1,002 12/28/2001 8 130 6 046 1,153 05125/2002 5 530 5454 1,7t2 12/08t2003 5510 5435 1,756 0112112004 5755 5 678 t,271 0912312002 6630 6537 1,029 0112412002 6.320 6 233 1,300 10122/2002 6 050 5 967 1,602 05/2012003 5790 5711 1,698 11124f2003 5600 5523 1,384 011t4t2003 6230 6.145 973 11129/2001 7.070 6.973 1,133 05/08/2002 6.280 6194 1,495 05/05/2603 6.125 6 041 1,509 05/1912003 5.670 5592 1,649 1010612003 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PNF PM2) SymRep! V5 CUSIP Investment # Federal Agency lesuee - Coupon 31364GJM2 01034 31364GTJ8 01039 Treasury Securities. Coupon 9128274M1 01026 Mortgage Backed Securities 3!~401WW7 00971 31360BJ21 00203 ~6215WX74 O0002 ~6215XZ S4 000~9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 3t, 1999 Average Purchele laauer Balance Date Par Value FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 55,5~6,581.33 1,~6,250.00 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 80,882.31 92,474,610.82 Total investments aria Average Market Value 12/01/1998 2,000,00000 1.973,200 00 02/1111999 4.000.000.00 3.963.600.00 56,515,0~0.00 56,521,633.00 08/03/1998 2,000,000.00 2,000,0~0.00 2,010,00000 2,0t0,000.00 02/23/!987 !I,849.12 ~2/t1217 09t15tt987 53,706 67 56,724 98 98/23/1986 17,31288 17,88421 05!23/1986 t ,455 68 t,5104! 84,324.35 88,231.77 93,909,576.37 93,930,116.79 Page 3 ststs~ YTM 360 Deya to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date 2,000,00000 5520 5 444 1.705 12/01/2003 3,996,25000 5.860 5 801 1,777 02/11/2004 56,509,303.10 5.998 1,376 1,996.250 00 1,996.250.0~ 5375 5400 487 07/31/2000 5.400 487 11,76391 8.000 8219 1,006 01/01/2002 49.611.54 8500 10018 4,171 0910112010 17~074 83 8 500 8 778 772 05t12/2001 1.484 79 9000 8 547 714 03t15!200! 79,935.07 9.461 2,915 93,895,740,19 5,669 858 Run Date' 04/12/1999 - 16 01 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep! V§ CUSIP Investment # laeuer Checking/Savings Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Caah Subtotal and Average Total Caah and Investment~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash March 31, 1999 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value 1,341,244.07 93,815,854.89 95,014,530,12 Market Value 1,104,953.75 95.035,070.54 Book Value 1,104,953 75 1,104,953.75 95,000,693.94 Stated Rate 2 000 YTM 360 Daya to Moody's Equiv. Maturity I 973 1 0 5.669 858 Page 4 Run Date* 0411211999 - 1601 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF _PM2) SymRepl V5 00g Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type March 1, 1999 through March 31, 1999 Page 5 CUSIP Inveatment # lesuer Certificates of Deposit - Bank 243-954720 01013 CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK 6385X 1KW9 01040 NATIONSBANK NA 6509-28649 #32 01012 SANWA 6509-28649 #33 01014 SANWA O1041 SANVVA Subtotal Beginning Balance 8,310,532.20 Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 26,001,719.82 Subtotal Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA FederalAgency Issues- Coupon 31331R2YO 01042 313393VK3 00971 3133M86L3 01043 Subtotal 1,456,953.75 Stated Tranlactlon Purcha~ee Rate Date or Deposits Sales/Maturities or Withdrawale 5.500 03/18/t999 0.00 2,000,000.00 5.100 03/1111999 2,000,000 00 0.00 5 500 03t0911999 0.00 1,000,000 00 5 400 03/16!1999 0 00 1,810,532 20 4900 03116/t999 1,810,532 20 0 00 3,8t0,532.20 4,810,532.20 Treasury Securities - Coupon Mortgage Backed Securities 313401vwv7 00071 31360BJ21 00203 362t5WX74 00002 36215XZS4 00069 5 210 2 000 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5.930 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.880 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.755 Subtotal 51,504,$15.80 Subtotal 1,6~6,260,00 6.998,000.00 6,998,000.00 3~939_000 00 3,939,000.00 5,000,000 00 5,000,000.00 4~291,000 O0 4,291,000.00 03t161t999 3,000,000.00 000 03/1911999 0.00 995,312,50 0312311999 3,000,000 O0 0.00 6,000,000.00 985,312.60 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 8000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 8500 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000 Subtotal 61,750.38 Total 89,351,821.75 0311511999 03/25/1999 03/15/1999 03/15/1999 0.00 000 0.00 000 0.00 20,747,532.20 66667 395.02 69249 61.13 1,815.31 15,098,660.01 Ending Balance 7,310,532.20 27,999,719.82 1,104,953.75 56,509,303.10 1,996,260.00 79,935.07 95,000,693.94 Run Date 04/12/t999 - 160t Portfolio CiTY CP PM (PRF_PM~t 5ymRept V5 CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE"NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE. SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE FROM EAST AVENUE TO 1000 FiEET EAST OF EAST AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9805 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Summit Avenue Street Improvements located on the north side of Summit Avenue from East Avenue to 1000 feet east of East Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City plans to construct street improvements along Summit Avenue from East Avenue to 1000 feet east of East Avenue. A portion of the project fronts Summit Intermediate School and the School District Office, located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and Summit Avenue. The improvements consist of full width pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights and the relocation of utility poles on the north side. A Cooperative Agreement between the Eftwanda School District and the City has been approved for the reimbursement from the School District for their share of the improvements. The project will be funded from Proposition Ill funds (Account No. 10-4637-9805). Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article l 9, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. /q CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS April 21, 1999 Page 2 The project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $176,000.00 including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $10,000.00 required for Construction Administration which includes advertising, printing, materials testing and construction survey. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 27, 1999 and May 4, 1999, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 18, 1999. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution /.5' VICINITY MAP FON' SUMMIT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS EAST AVENUE TO 1200' E/O EAST AVE /6 RESOLUTION NO. q q-- t~ ~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO 1000 FEET EAST OF EAST AVENUE. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said Cityof Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 pro. on Tuesday, May 18, ! 999, sealed bids or proposals for the SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMEN'TS in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for the SUMMIT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that re~ard, the Director ofthe Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, ifsuch laborer, workman or mechanic /7 is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation ofthe provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to joumeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied !by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and: the surplus, ifany shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful ]performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additmnal bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and alii of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractors License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califomia Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder 'will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 21" day of April, 1999. Publish Dates: April 27, I999 and May 4, 1999 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 21" day of April, 1999. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 21" day of April, 1999. Executed this 21" day of April, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 27, 1999 and May 4, 1999 02O CI'FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and City Council Members Jack Lam, City Manager Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer ~ Replacement pak, es for consent calendar item Item 5 on the Council's agenda for the April 21, 1999 Council meeting pertains to the adoption of the amended 1998/99 budget. Due to an oversight, the Library Fund's contract services line item (02-4532-6028) was understated by $50,000 and the Special Districts Administration contract services line item (33-4131-6028) was understated by $20,000. Additionally, the Library Services and Technologies Act Grant Fund was inadvertently excluded from the amended budget. The budget should be included as follows: 136-4532-1300 136-4532-3100 136-4532-3300 136-4532-.3900 136-4532-6028 136-4532-7047 Part-time Salaries $17,900 Travel and Meetings $ 300 Mileage $ 200 O & M $15,640 Contract Services $ 250 C'ap. Outlay-Computer $14,000 Please find attached the revised pages of the staff report. I apologize for the inconvenience. i: ',,financeXbudget 2000\oversite .wpd j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTrON 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND 12 FUND 13 FUND 14 FUND 16 FUND 19 FUND 20 FUND 21 FUND 22 FUND 23 FUND 24 FUND 25 FUND 26 FUND 28 FUND 32 FUND 33 FUND 35 FUND 40 FUND 41 FUND 42 FUND 43 FUND 44 FUND 45 FUND 46 FUND 47 FUND 48 FUND 55 FUND 56 FUND 57 FUND 58 FUND 59 01 GENERAL 02 LIBRARY 03 REIMBISTATE COUNTY PRKG CIT SPORTS COMPLEX 06 CCWD 07 CALTRANS AGREEMENT 08 S.B. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AGREEMENT 09 GAS TAX 2106, 2107 & 2107.5 10 PROPOSITION 111 TDA ARTICLE 8 FUNDS COMM SRVCS-RECREATION AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT PED.GRANT/ART.3 DRAINAGE ! ETIWANDA PARK DEVELOPMENT BEAUTIFICATION FUND SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE: GEN'L CITY F.A.U. I ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CAPITAL RESERVE FUND R-Z'BERG GRANT FUND C.D.B.G. FUND MEASURE I SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN SB 140 LMD #1 GENERAL LMD #2 VICTORIA LMO #3A PRKWY SO. OF 6TH ST. E.OF 1-15 LMD #4 TERRA VISTA LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA LMD ~ CARYN COMMUNITY LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA LMD 4 SOUTH ETIWANDA SLD #1 ARTERIAL SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL SLD #3 VICTORIA SLD #4 TERRA VISTA SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY SUMMARY BY FUND 31,998,540 1,304,800 8,500 1,352,830 27,570 20,850 69,320 1,556,440 1,878,250 218.160 1,294,310 205,340 84,000 25,630 492,400 772,550 2,154,380 142,320 4,44.4,000 428,500 29,090 1,841,100 1,706,000 478,220 113,000 1,126,840 2,373,970 4,030 1,750,810 7,490 409,460 762,200 402,440 18,310 494,420 261,300 177,050 75,640 54,110 33,920,900 1,337,120 16,000 1,359,970 54,900 52,040 64,610 1,610,560 1,525,090 64,000 1,437,040 178,200 89,000 20,000 630,350 545,440 3,149,410 518,550 6,456,000 1,097,470 0 1,041,550 2,827,820 495,230 248,000 1,250,610 2,400,080 3,120 1,429,740 3,340 376,420 948,690 354,630 15,090 492,830 262,810 178,740 108,490 54,480 35,192,100 1,359,420 16,000 1,362,520 284,900 50,540 64,610 1,661,030 1,635,320 189,180 1,185,760 178,650 4,000 95,000 1,212,000 684,480 2,446,250 686,050 485,000 510,000 0 779,340 5,077,360 538,860 108,000 1,309,700 2,364,220 2,980 1,433,210 4,790 395,470 761,750 348,660 16,620 567,210 332,810 220,560 125,490 64,480 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FUND 60 FUND 61 FUND 62 FUND 64 FUND 72 FUND 74 FUND 75 FUND 76 FUND 78 FUND 81 FUND 82 FUND 83 FUND 87 FUND 90 FUND 93 FUND 94 FUND 95 FUND 96 FUND 97 FUND 109 FUND 110 FUND 111 FUND 113 FUND 114 FUND 115 FUND 116 FUND 117 FUND 118 FUND 119 FUND 122 FUND 125 FUND 131 FUND 132 FUND 133 FUND 134 FUND 135 FUND 136 FUND 139 FUND 140 FUND 141 FUND 150 FUND XX2 SUMMARY BY FUND SLD ~6 INDUSTRIAL AREA SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO OF ARROW / REDEMP. INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: Equip. Replacement INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: Computer Equip. Replacement CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA,'HIGHLAND IMPROY. CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV.:FIood AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: REDEMPTION AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVE AD 82-1R 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL: IMIPROV. CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK REDEMPTION FUND PD 85 RED HILL & HERITAGE: REDMPT AD 62-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: REDEMPTION AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: RESERVE AD 86-2 PJC DRAINAGE DIST.: IMPROY. AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: REDMPT AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: RESERVE FUND METROLINK MAINT. & SECURITY PROGRAM USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN GRANT MAJOR URBAN LIBRARY RESOURCE GRANT UNIVERSAL COPS GRANT COPS MORE GRANT LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLEF) GRANT ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT GRANDPARENTS WITH BOOKS GRANT AD 91-2 REDEMPTION CPD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER SENIOR OUTREACH PROGRAM GRANT COMMUNITY SKATE PARK TEEN AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM GRANT CA STATE LIBRARY FOUNDAT}ON GRANT LIBRARY SERVICES & TECHNOLOGIES ACT COPS UNIVERSAL GRANT '98 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 97 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 98 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD REGIONAL CHOICE TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV 48,370 81,460 92,660 17,460 18,160 18,160 4,060 3,960 3,960 504,760 503,850 503,850 135,000 954,830 949,430 0 317,660 322,860 0 0 0 334,280 332,870 332,870 15,000 0 0 202,580 140,590 140,590 7,000 4,250 9,000 47,710 5,000 0 1,862,110 1,873,480 1,783,500 1,699,010 1,984,790 1,914,700 1,055,500 641,490 693,550 625,030 652,410 652,410 50,500 344,090 0 258,080 174,460 172,490 82,930 0 0 0 0 0 36,110 39,000 31,000 96,970 89,130 89,780 13,000 13,000 13,000 150,000 125,000 125,000 79,540 0 0 0 0 0 269,790 258,090 426,780 3,500 3,500 3,500 5,000 0 0 32,910 27,790 27,790 426,890 429,720 429,720 25,000 238,680 238,680 0 0 3,000 10,080 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,290 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 92,320 0 0 77,500 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 68,662,340 76,025,580 73,100,710 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998~99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 02-4532 03-4451 05-4160 06-4637 07-4647 08-4647 09-4637 10-4637 12-4637 13-4563 14-4158 16-4637 19-4637 20-4532 21-4647 20-4991 22-4637 23-4637 24-4637 SUMMARY BY FUND, BY COST CENTER LIBRARY REIMB/STATE & COUNTY PRKG ClT SPORTS COMPLEX CCWD REIMBURSEMENTS CALTRANS REIMB. S.B.CNTY REIMB. GAS TAX 2106, 2107 & 2107.5 PROPOSITION 111 TDA ARTICLE 8 FUNDS COMM SRVCS-RECREATN AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT PED.GRANT/ART.3 DRAINAGE / ETIWANDA PARK DEVELOPMENT BEAUTIFICATION FUND TRANSFERS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE: GEN'L CITY F.A.U. / ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 1,304,800 1,337,120 1,359,420 8,500 16,000 16,000 1,352,830 1,359,970 1,362,520 27,570 54,900 284,900 20,850 52,040 50,540 69,320 64,610 64,610 1,556,440 1,610,560 1,661,030 1,878,250 1,525,090 1,635,320 218,160 64,000 189,180 1,294,310 1,437,040 1,185,760 205,340 178,200 178,650 84,000 89,000 4,000 25,630 20,000 95,000 492,400 630,350 1,212,000 772,550 545,440 684,480 0 0 0 2,154,380 3,149,410 2,446,250 142,320 518,550 686,050 4,444,000 6,456,000 485,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 25-4285 26-4532 28-4333 32-4637 33-4131 35-4637 40-4130 41-4130 42-4130 43-4130 44-4130 45-4130 46-4130 47-4130 48-4130 58-4130 56-4130 57-4130 58-4130 59-4130 60-4130 DESCRIPTION CAPITAL RESERVE FUND R-Z'BERG GRANT FUND C.D.B.G. FUND MEASURE I SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN SB 140 LMD #1 GENERAL LMD #2 VICTORIA LMD #3A PRKWY SO. 6TH ST. E.OF H5 LMD ~ TERRA VISTA LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA SLD #1 ARTERIAL SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL SLD #3 VICTORIA SLD #4 TERRA VISTA SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 428,500 29,090 1,841,100 1,706,000 478,220 113,000 1,126,840 2,373,970 4,030 1,750,810 7,490 409,460 762,200 402,440 18,310 494,420 261,300 177,050 75,640 54,110 48,370 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1,097,470 0 1,041,550 2,827,82O 495,230 248,000 1,250,610 2,400,080 3,120 1,429,740 3,340 376,420 948,690 354,630 15,090 492,830 262,810 178,740 108,490 54,480 81,460 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 510,000 0 779,340 5,077,360 538,860 108,000 1,309,700 2,364,220 2,980 1,433,210 4,790 395,470 761,750 348,660 16,620 567,210 332,810 220,560 125,490 64,480 92,660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 61-4130 62-4130 64-4130 72-4225 74-4225 75-4130 76-4130 78-4130 81-4637 82-4130 83-4637 87-4130 90-4130 93-4130 94-4991 95-4637 96-4130 97-4991 109-4647 110-4637 DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA 17,460 SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 4,060 AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO OF ARROW ! REDEMP. 504,760 INTER-GOV'T SERVlCES/EQPT RPLC & USAGE 135,000 INTER-GOV'T SRVCSlCOMPUTER EQPT RPLC 0 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV. 0 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND: FLOOD 334,280 AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT 15,000 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: REDEMPTION 202,580 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVE 7,000 AD 82-1R 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL: IMPROY. 47,710 CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK REDEMPTION FUND 1,862,110 PD 85 RED HILL & HERITAGE: REDMPT 1,699,010 AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: REDEMPTION 1,055,500 AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: RESERVE 625,030 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: IMPROV. 50,500 AD 86-2 PJC DRAINAGE DIST.: REDMPT 258,080 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: RESERVE FUND 82,930 METROLINK MAINT. & SECURITY PROGRAM 0 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 36,110 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 18,160 3,960 503,860 954,830 317,660 0 332,870 0 140,590 4,250 5,000 1,873,480 1,984,790 641,490 652,410 344,090 174,460 0 0 39,000 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 18,160 3,960 503,850 949,430 322,860 0 332,870 0 140,590 9,000 0 1,783,500 1,914,700 693,550 652,410 0 172,490 0 0 31,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 111-4532 113-4532 114-4451 115-4451 116-4451 117~451 118-4532 119-4532 122-4130 125-413O 131-4130 132-4532 133-4532 134-4532 135-4532 136-4532 139-4451 140-4451 141.4451 150-4637 XX2-4637 DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN GRANT MAJOR URBAN RESOURCE LIBRARY GRANT UNIVERSAL COPS GRANT COPS MORE GRANT LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLEF) GRA ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT GRANDPARENTS WITH BOOKS GRANT BENEFIT ASSESS. DIST.No 91-2 (Day Canyon Basin CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE AD 93-1 MASl COMMERCE CENTER SENIOR OUTREACH PROGRAM GRANT COMMUNITY SKATE PARK TEEN AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM GRANT CA STATE LIBRARY FOUNDATION GRANT LIBRARY SERVICES & TECHNOLOGIES ACT COPS UNIVERSAL GRANT '98 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 97 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 98 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD REGIONAL CHOICE TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV 96,970 13,000 150,000 79,540 0 269,790 3,500 5,000 32,910 426,890 25,000 0 10,080 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 89,130 13,000 125,000 0 0 258,090 3,500 0 27,790 429,720 238,680 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 89,780 13,000 125,000 0 0 426,780 3,500 0 27,790 429,720 238,680 3,000 0 0 0 48,290 150,000 0 92,320 77,500 0 GRAND TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS BY DEPT (INCLUDING GENERAL FUND) 68,662,340 76,025,580 73,100,710 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ACCOUNT ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 02-4532 LIBRARY: PROGRAM SERVICES SUMMARY BY FUND, BY COST CENTER, BY ACCOUNT 02-4532-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 413,890 450,530 450,530 02-4532-1200 OVERTIME SALARIES 0 0 0 02-4532-1300 PART TIME SALARIES 249,390 254,380 264,380 02-4532-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 187,820 174,290 174,290 02-4532-3100 TRAVEL & MEETING 4,000 4,000 5,500 02-4532-3300 MILEAGE 3,800 5,000 5,000 02-4532-3900 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 139,300 163,330 163,330 02-4532-3914 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS: City Facilities 10,530 0 0 02-4532-3932 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION 7,140 4,440 9,920 02-4532-3933 EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT RENTAL 380 380 0 02-4532-3956 DUES 2,100 2,100 2,100 02-4532-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 4,490 4,220 4,220 02-4532-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 173,380 175,450 182,150 02-4532-6036 CONTRACT SERVICES: City Faci)ities 39,580 0 0 02-4532-7047 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0 32,000 32,000 02-4532-8019 TELEPHONE UTILITIES 15,000 15,000 15,000 02-4532-8021 WATER UTILITIES 4,000 4,000 3,000 02-4532-8022 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 50,000 48,000 48,000 02-4532 TOTAL: 1,304,800 1,337,120 1,359,420 03-4451 03-4451-3900 REIMB/STATE & COUNTY RE PARKING CITATIONS PARKING CITATIONS SURCHRG 8,500 16,000 16,000 03-4451 TOTAL: 8,500 16,000 16,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR t998-99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 33-4131 33-4131-1100 33-4131-1300 33-4131-1900 33 -4131-3100 33-4131-3300 33-4131-3900 33-4131-3932 33-4131-3960 33-4131-5900 33-4131-6028 33-4131-7047 SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT' 216,600 0 92,740 2,750 30O 55,100 0 '1,450 62,610 24,670 22,000 231,630 3,900 85,070 3,000 30O 59,790 1,500 1,530 67,080 22,670 18,760 231,630 0 85,070 3,000 30O 58,730 9,240 1,530 67,080 59,520 22,760 33-4131 TOTAL: 478,220 495,230 538,860 35-4637 35-4637-9027 35-4637-9510 35-4637-9517 35-4637-9520 35-4637-9521 35-4637-9522 35-4637-9709 35-4637-9710 35-4637-9803 35-4637-9839 35-4637-9840 SB 140 FUND HAVEN: FOOTHILL TO BASELINE EAST AVE (HIGHLAND AVE/ViCTORIA) 6th St (~! RR Spur Widening HERMOSA (4TH TO FOOTHILL) HAVEN (BASELINE TO WILSON) HAVEN (BASELINE TO WILSON) Haven-West Side L/S from Church to Baseline DAY CREEK BLVD (Baseline to Highland) 4th St-Utica to Pittsburg Pavement Rehab Haven West Side Foothill to Deer Creek Rehab Haven East Side Foothill to Baseline Rehab 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 108,000 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 25,000 108,000 35,000 10,000 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108,000 0 0 0 35-4637 TOTAL: 113,000 248,000 108,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 135-4532 135-4532-3100 135-4532-3900 135-4532-6028 CA STATE LIBRARY FOUNDATION GRANT TRAVEL & MEETING MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES 135-4532 TOTAL: 136-4532 136-4532-1300 136-4532-3100 136-4532-3300 136-4532-3900 136-4532-6028 136-4532-7047 LIBRARY SERVICES & TECHNOLOGIES ACT PART-TIME PAYROLL TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 136-4532 TOTAL: 17,900 300 200 15,640 250 14,000 48,290 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 139-4451 COPS UNIVERSAL GRANT '99 139-4451-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 150,000 150,000 139-4451 TOTAL: 150,000 150,000 140-4451 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT '97 140~451-7045 CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLE 140-4451 TOTAL: 141-4451 141-4451-3900 141-4451-7045 LOCAL LAWENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT'98 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY:VEHICLE 9,380 82,940 141-4451 TOTAL: 92,320 150-4637 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD 150-4637-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 77,500 150~637 TOTAL: 77,500 XX2-4637 REGIONAL CHOICE TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPRV XX2-4637-XXXX Metrolink Station Phase II XX2-4637 TOTAL: I CITY ()F RAN C HO C(.)CA MONG A STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the .City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer APPROVAL OF AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 APPROPRIATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is requested that Council approve the attached fiscal year 1998/99 budgetary adjustments for all City funds. BACKGROUND When the budget development process:begins, staff is actually projecting estimated revenues and appropriations fourteen to sixteen momhs ah~ead of anticipated needs. In general, estimated revenues and expenditures have been adjusted to reflect a more current snapshot in all funds. Am~ually, Council adopts the amended appropriations. There has been no shift of estimated revenues and expenditures ~hieh deviates from the direction Council has requested of staff. Capital. improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Council items throughout the year. The attached schedules submitted for your review indicate the prior year budgeted revenues and expenditures, the current year's (1998/99) adopted badget amounts, and the 1998/99 amended budget amounts in each account area. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Tamara L. Layne Finance Officer Attachments i:\finance\budget2000\amend99.wpd City of Rancho ¢ucamonga Amended Fiscal Year !99'8/99 Budget REVEN, UE5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATE~D REVJFNUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 GENERAL FUND: ::" ':,""i; ":.: ,,,, i' . :. .' ~'~ ',' ', ,., ' ':'~ t,W, ~.'~,~ : ' i "I ..,i~." ' ~ , . -,, , ,. ~,,,:,'~:,.. ,. ',q, "' ,~' "'."i:~"-;~ ~,~ ~' ' "'~:'"'" "~''"'"'~' "'"" ~'~"~'"~ ....~:?":'? i'."!~ :.',~ii'fi~.~ i¥; ',' '' ~' ,'-':',,[,H,~'. ' ~:~'-',',,~i[~ ," ~ '~k ' ' ' ,'hi', -', . ...... :! ..: ~,.:t. '., s'.' . ,i'I[' ~,. :'!J t,. ' . lq, 117,474 (1) TAXES 01-3900 1020 Property Tax - ClY secured 1,414,000 01-3900 1030 Property Tax - C/Y unsecured 80,000 01-3900 1040 Prop Tax - P/Y sec & unsec 103,000 01-3900 1060 Property Tax - penalties/interest 60,000 01-3900 1065 Supplemental Taxes 10,000 01-3900 1075 Unitary Tax 0 01-3900 1080 Utility Users Fee 5,732,210 01-3900 1100 Sales & Use Taxes 9,662,820 01-3900 1110 Prop 172 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 167,300 01-3900 1185 Transient Occupancy Tax 122,400 01-3900 1800 Property Transfer Tax 225,000 01-3901 4550 Franchise Fee - Gas & Electric 1,335,000 01-3901 4551 Franchise Fee - Residential Refuse 967,000 01-3901 4552 Franchise Fee - Commercial Refuse 798,500 01-3901 4553 Franchise Fee - Cable TV 500,000 1,456,000 1,432,000 89,100 82,000 103,000 101,000 67,000 77,910 10,200 10,200 0 133,580 5,101,810 4,967,910 10,250,000 11,272,100 193,800 190,460 130,000 155,050 275,000 387,060 1,276,900 1,462,310 899,890 920,220 974,890 949,300 573,000 575,770 Total Taxes 21,177,230 21,400,590 22,716,870 (2) LICENSES & PERMITS 01-3900 22OO 01-3901 2220 01-3901 2290 01-3901 2300 Business Licenses Bicycle Licenses Building Permits Other Licenses & Permits 850,000 925,000 1,071,320 100 100 110 725,000 850,000 1,050,000 7,200 7,500 21,070 Total Licenses & Permits 1,582,300 1,782,600 2,142,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED, REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 117,474 GENERAL FUND: (3) FINES & FORFEITS 01-3901 2460 Vehicle Code Fines 180,000 187,000 227,280 01-3901 2461 Parking Citations 90,000 90,000 100,000 01-3901 2472 Vehicle Release Fee 115,800 125,000 125,000 01-3901 2473 Citation Proof of Correction Fee 900 1,000 1,000 01-3901 3450 General Ordinance Fines 13,800 9,200 15,040 01-3901 3465 Loud Party Ordinance Fines 170 Total Fines & Forfeits 400,500 412,200 468,490 (4) MISCELLANEOUS 01-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 300,000 361,260 430,660 01-3901 7910 Sale of Printed Materials 71,600 60,000 64,360 01-3901 7950 Returned Item Charge 300 600 750 01-3901 8515 Proceeds on Sale of Investment 0 0 0 01-3901 8519 Sale of Taxable Items 0 550 290 01-3901 8520 Other Revenue 1,440 8,500 8,370 01-3901 8740 Sale of Machinery & Equipment 0 500 28,000 01-3901 8780 Sale of Land 0 0 0 Total Miscellaneous 373,340 431,410 532,430 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATJED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990' = 104,887 116,045 117,474 GENERAL FUND: , ' ,. ;.: ', ~. '~ ,, ' .' i , . ,,' ~., , ,' . :~ .' , ' , · . ., ,. . . . , ,~ ~"'...,",, "~:"- r , ,,,,!,,_ :, , ~.. ....: ....:::~ ;i,,:,,.~..,,..~,~.,,[~ . .. : ., ..... ~: .,., ..' .... :.... ~ '.r :..., ~,,~ ,.~.,~! '-"a:~!~..~':, ~.:[,~I..; .... .:...' ....:: ." .:......~.:.."."~.;.':~",.. ~ 4.i.i,'~.,i~.[..~,~I'~ , ,. ........ :. ; - '..' ' ..'~ ......,-~- - .~. ,i' .' :, ,,~, ~, ~i [1~'~' 'liii~t' . ,~-.~,..,.~,.:~..:,: ~...."..: ~,., :.i.,~.., :: ~.' '"':"~....-~...... i,~ ,~. ~.,,'!,t!: _..'.~.!!.;., .~'.!,.. (5) INTERGOVERNMENTAL 01-3900 5230 01-3900 525O 01-3901 5338 Motor Vehicle in Lieu 4,647,000 5,127,000 5,049,100 Homeowners Property' Tax Relief 55,500 61,900 60,070 Off Highway License Fees 1,900 1,800 1,900 Total Intergovernmental 4,704,400 5,190,700 5,111,070 (6) CHARGES FOR SERVICES 01-3901 1186 01-3901 1200 01-3901 2400 01-3901 3455 01-3901 3973 01-3901 7260 01-3901 7280 01-3901 7290 01-3901 7300 01-3901 7310 01-3901 7320 01-3901 7330 01-3901 734O 01-3901 7350 Finger Print Fees 17,000 33,000 33,000 D.A.R.E. Program Reimbursement 100,910 102,910 102,910 Candidates Filing Fees 0 12,000 5,390 False Alarm Fee 8,000 8,000 8,000 Booking Fees Recovery 400 500 710 Plan Check Fees 400,000 375,000 420,000 Planning Fees 300,000 500,000 400,000 Engineering Fees 600,000 800,000 750,000 Disaster Prep. Special Program Fees 25,750 30,000 27,750 Planning Dept. Special Program Fees 55,000 200,000 250,000 Community Services Special Program Fe 20,880 35,380 38,970 DARE Program Promotions & Contributi¢ 2,500 2,500 960 Building & Safety Special Services Fees 45,000 115,000 153,400 Engineering Special Services Fees 85,000 200,000 200,000 Total Charges for Services 1,660,440 2,414,290 2,39t,090 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATFn REV!=NUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 117,474 GENERAL FUND: (7) OTHERS 01-3999 8522 01-3999 8523 01-3999 8524 01-3999 8525 01-3999 8530 01-3999 8531 01-3999 8532 Non-Abated Reimbursements 31,400 Special District Reimbursement 781,760 Reimbursement From RDA 718,040 Fire District Reimbursement 138,640 Reimbursement From Other Funds 430,490 Reimbursement From FEMA Claims 0 PlY Reimbursement 0 23,000 121,700 787,430 786,620 883,560 883,560 134,260 124,350 440,860 461,140 20,000 0 Total Others 2,100,330 2,289,110 2,377,370 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 31.998.540 33.920.900 35.739.820 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATEn REVFNUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104. 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS '.:' ~" ,,.~-~" :'. "..=' ~ '"':'~: ;I:.', F~"~ ',.~i! '~''"', ,'., ,"' "~' . ;~ ,u"',7 !iu,]' "['"~ ~:' , d"'"I,';~' , :c~: -"I;"'" ~:,:;'it' 'd',,li~': , , -, ............. I - , ,' ' air ""'. ................... .........~'.~.'I~'~'.~ 'ii~" ~ "'~!'~'~ i,,,~,'~ ,, . '~";u ,. ' ',H .i_,.'~,"J~j.~,:'~ ~: ',.': i',"j' '""" ...."' ' · '~i' P;~i;t'.' ~'~), ~'..'" ' '. ~.:.: ~'.'.i! :~,'. ". :'~ !(i,. "~'f i,~i ~ "~. "~I; .- , i'; '.".' i ' '~ ..... '. '":, i'~:,,,,':':~ '.~', .'~' l',' ,['.'.;.~ ",'"." ',.'~", .... , t . i . : i i' . ' ' ;' ' .' :' ' ',', ,'" '. ....' "' '" L'!11~' '? '' ' 'hl~""J ' LIBRARY 02-3900 1020 02-3900 1030 02-3900 1040 02-3900 1065 02-3901 4600 02-3901 1502 02-3901 1507 02-3901 1508 02-3901 1509 02-3901 1510 02-3901 1511 02-3901 1513 02-3901 1514 02-3901 7910 02-3901 8520 02-3901 1515 02-3992 8000 R C Library Prop Tax/Current Year Secur~ 851,120 854,000 R C Library Prop TaxlC Y Unsecured 27,6t0 27,710 R C Library Prop TaxiPrior Yr Sec&Unse¢ 14,500 14,560 R C Library Prop Tax/Supplemental Taxe: 2,000 2,010 Interest Earnings 0 3,000 CLSA: Direct Loan 15,000 20,000 Library Fines & Fees 92,500 97,000 Media Rentals 62,500 62,500 Information Services Fees 1,000 1,000 Private Contributions 50,000 50,000 Public Library Foundation 41,900 68,000 Contribution / Fund Raising / Telethon 30,000 20,000 Afinity Credit Card Revenue 0 4,000 Sale Of Printed Materials 4,000 5,000 "Other" Revenue: 96197 & 97/98 From Fd 7,670 4,000 Technology Center Revenue 5,000 15,000 Transfer In: 96197 & 97198 Transfer In Fro 100,000 100,000 Total Library Fund 1,304,800 1,347,780 854,000 27,710 14,560 2,010 8,000 32,000 97,000 62,500 2,500 50,000 139,140 27,000 3,000 10,000 8,390 10,000 100,000 1,448,010 03-3901 03-3901 03-3901 Reimb. State & County Parking Cit. Surcharge 2462 2463 2464 State Park Cit. Surcharge County Jail Park Cit. Surcharge County Court Park Cit. Surcharge Total Reimb. State & County Parking Cit. 3,500 6,500 6,500 2,500 4,750 4,750 2,500 4,750 4,750 8,500 16,000 16,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET EST!.MAT. E~ REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104. 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS .' . , '~. '~'. ~. ~ ~ . . .!.i'. :, :"i '.i.-:.': . i '~'!.~'~:' ', ,.;,',' ' ',..~ :..~"~,'.':.":..~ '~' . ' : ,' ' ', :' ':" ~',:-',":,,.,:," ':'".",'.','~":',."t',.,:~ ~r~',d~ EJ~.' '.~ ~ .;' ~ .,~ :::~ ~, . . : ', ' , '. ,' .. ' ~: i' : ~. '... ,. '-i '!~ ¢~t~ ';'?~,'~, "' ;,r.~,', - ~ . ' .r..!~:' ,-;,." , ..... "i' # ' ~ r ,: .. ;..., .......... .... ',,~',,~,~+'·: ' ': ' :-}-'~'"~,' ~':" '~,,. ' ' :" .' ~ '.~ i~4~'~! I; ~,!1 -~R[ Ilil . ,'P, 'lBi~.rf ~.O..' .., .., .... :.~. ., . ................... .:: ........... ~ ...;~ .......!~ .~.!~ .. q,.:..: .~..../~i~,~!!.,.,.~..,... Sports Complex 05-3901 2465 05-3901 2466 05-3901 2467 05-3901 2468 05-3901 2469 05-3901 2470 05-3901 2471 05-3901 2474 05-3901 2476 05-3901 2479 05-3901 2480 05-3901 8520 05-3992 8000 05-xxxx xxxx Activity Revenues/Concessions 65,000 0 500 Activity Revenues/Special Event Rental 35,000 35,000 26,000 Activity Revenues/Admissions Tax 169,000 142,000 141,070 Activity Revenues/Stadium Lease 250,000 320,000 290,000 Activity Revenues/Recreation Dept. Prog. 451,700 412,000 387,360 Activity Revenues/Parking Fees 64,000 40,000 35,000 Activity RevenueslMaint Services 40,000 17,000 10,000 Stadium Security Reimbursement 57,500 60,000 60,000 Special Event Merchandising 1,500 0 0 Baseball Security Reimbursement 60,000 64,000 56,500 Special Events: Film Permits 0 770 770 Other Revenue 0 0 12,000 Transfers In: From General Fund 159,130 269,200 269,200 Transfers In: From Fund Balance 0 0 74,120 Total Sports Complex 1,352,830 1,359,970 1,362,520 Reimbursements/CCWD 06-3901 5891 ReimbursementslCCWD 06-xxxx xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Belance Total Reimbursements CCWD 27,570 28,430 258,000 0 26,470 26,900 27,570 54,900 284,900 ReimbursementslCal Trans 07-3901 5891 Reimbursements/Cal Trans 07-xxxx xxxx Transfers In 20,850 20,960 21,000 0 31,080 29,540 Total Reimbursements Cal Trans 20,850 52,040 50,540 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET FSTIM:~TFn RFV!=NUFS POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS .:.. - . ...... · ...... -.; :...--r .~; .~. L...~ , ~: ,7 '~;-~?,'12,[~..~.:~: ....- ..... :... -, .............,, . .. :'L:'r'. .... :', ;', . ' I' ,' , , . . ', , '= ; ' ,~ ,', ',.~ , ~: ."-" ~,:a..,,_~ ~J-~ · .,' r~. .... ,..~..,:. , ......... .....,.-.,_. ....~ ,. .:.~-~,.~...-~!~'T~.~-"~-~..--.~--:~,.~.", ~-.~"~ip.:, .,L .~.,, - --~::-~!.~-~ ";''i~" ' ," . ..... -1 ...... ,' ,, r .... "[ ._--.~_ ~ _ '~-~""" i ...... '" ' ...... ' ......' ..... ' .... " '"~ ........ , -,.. ......~,.~'~'~i .............~...,~.., .i---"~..,,,... ,~!..~' '~._.~.. ~- :.~ ',,,It "i, ~"'~-'' ~ ,'-" ',' ',,'-"; ',': ,', ' ' :,'": '~,' ' '., ',', :" : ': ', :-' ,~!",' ,;'~,:,? ~,,~"~;,' ,'~,. · , i"l ',c ;' '~' ' . , :, j ,, :.: .- .-'" ,' - : -:', .,: , I ,:',i '- .: ",' h- -, ' ,,': ... I . , ~ ~-l';h~::-',.-.i ; ,,, ~ Reimbursement: San Bernardino Coonty 08-3901 5891 Reimbursement/County of S.B. 85,000 81,530 64,610 Total Reimbursements San Bernardino County 85,000 81,530 64,610 Gas Tax 2106, 2107, 2107.5 09-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 6,000 11,900 45,000 09-3900 5110 State Gas Tax - 2106 350,000 375,000 375,000 09-3900 5130 State Gas Tax - 2107 800,000 975,000 975,000 09-3900 5150 State Gas Tax - 2107.5 10,000 10,000 10,000 09-xxxx xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance 373,440 238,660 256,030 Total Gas Tax 2106, 2107, 2107.5 1,539,440 1,610,560 1,661,030 Gas Tax 2105 - Prop 111 10-3900 5140 Gas Tax 2105 - prop 111 700,000 690,000 760,000 10-3900 5880 Grant Income 0 104,000 104,000 10-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 9,000 13,900 50,000 10-3902 8520 Other Revenue 0 0 149,600 10-xxxx xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance 1,169,250 622,190 571,720 Total GasTax 2105 - Prop 111 1,878,250 1,430,090 1,635,320 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET FSTIMATF!~ RFVFN!iFS POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS 12-3901 12-xxxx SB325/TDA ART.8 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total SB325/TDA ART. 8 0 1,800 10,000 218,160 62,200 179,180 218,160 64,000 189,180 13-3901 13-3901 13-xxxx Recreation Services 7710 Recreation Fees 8519 Sale of Taxable Items xxxx Transfers In: From Fd Bal & Capital Rsrv(#25) @ E 1,326,120 1,434,800 1,127,620 0 0 3,100 0 4,540 55,040 Total Recreation Services 1,326,120 1,439,340 1,185,760 14-3901 14-3900 14-xxxx AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT 46OO 5001 XXXX Interest Earnings Air Quality Improv Grant Revenue Transfers In: From Fd Bal & Capital Rsrv @ 6/97 Total Air Quality Improv. Grant 2,000 2,000 2,000 130,000 112,000 112,000 73,340 64,200 64,650 205,340 178,200 178,650 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET FSTIMATED..REYENUF,S POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 SPECIAL FUNDS 116,045 117,474 16-3900 16-3901 16.xxxx Pedestrian Grants/Article 3 5180 Pedestrian/Bicycle Sidewalks 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfers In From Fund Balance 80,000 89,000 4,000 50 0 400 3,950 0 0 Total Pedestrian Grants/Article 3 84,000 89,000 4,400 19-3901 19-3901 19-xxxx Drainage Facilities/Etiwanda 4600 7485 XXXX Interest Earnings Storm Drain Fees Transfers In: From Fund Balance 1,1 O0 800 5,000 20,000 20,000 30,000 4,530 0 60,000 Total Drain. Facilities/Etiwanda 25,630 20,800 95,000 20-3901 20-3901 20-xxxx Park Development 4600 Interest Earnings 7730 Park Development Fees xxxx Transfer In: From Fund Balance 800 5,500 60,000 500,000 500,000 900,000 0 38,470 252,000 Total Park Development 500,800 543,970 1,212,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS .Budg,a: .ted ~.Bud~,.etedl .Reven~e Beautification 21~3901 4600 21-3901 7780 21~xxx xxxx 21-xxxx xxxx Interest Earnings 1,000 4,100 Beautification Fees 250,000 250,000 Transfer In: From Fund Balance 193,050 196,340 Transfers In: From Capital Rsrv (#25)199; 328,500 0 5,000 160,000 519,480 0 Total Beautification 772,550 450,440 684,480 Systems Development 22.3901 4600 22-3901 7431 22.3901 7432 22-xxxx xxxx 22-3901 7441 Interest Earnings 14,000 33,700 Transportation: Development Fee 580,000 700,000 Transp.: Emergency Vehicle Fee 5,800 7,000 Transfers In: From Fund Balance 1,554,580 1,964,240 Developer's Participation 0 0 Total Systems Development 60,000 990,000 9,000 1,227,250 160,000 2,154,380 2,704,940 2,446,250 Drainage Facilities/General City 23.3901 4600 Interest Earnings 23-3901 7480 Storm Drain Fees 23-xxxx xxxx Transfers In: From Fund Balance 0 500 400 40,000 120,000 250,000 102,320 398,050 435,650 Total Drainage FaclGeneral City 142,320 518,550 686,050 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS I.S.T.E.A. (FAU) 24-3900 6750 Federal Highway Grants 24-3900 8520 Other Revenue 4,444,000 6,246,000 485,000 0 35,000 0 Total I.S.T.E.A. (FAU) 4,444,000 6,281,000 485,000 Capital Reserve 25-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 25-3999 8524 Reimbursement From RDA Total Capital Reserves 1,430,000 1,725,000 1,320,430 588,000 588,000 0 2,018,000 2,313,000 1,320,430 R.Z'Berg Grant 26-3900 5890 R.Z'Berg Grant 29,090 0 0 Total R.Z'Berg Grant 29,090 0 0 Grants - CDBG 28-3901 5880 CDBG Reimbursements 1,835,590 1,036,550 779,340 Total Grants - CDBG 1,835,590 1,036,550 779,340 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS Measure I - Transportation Revenue 32-3900 5000 Measure h Local Street Allotment 650,000 700,000 800,000 32-3900 6000 Measure h Specific(Arterial ) Projects 0 2,500,000 1,743,750 32-3901 4600 Interest Income 12,000 10,000 150,000 32-xxxx xxxx Transfer in: From Fund Balance 1,044,000 0 2,383,610 Total Measu re I 1,706,000 3,210,000 5,077,360 Special Districts' Administration 33-3901 8520 Other Revenue/Special Dist. Transfers in 425,910 447,190 447,190 33-3901 4600 Interest Income 25,000 20,000 30,000 33-xxxx xxxx Transfer ~n: From Fund Balance 27,310 28,040 41,670 Total Special Dist. Admin. 478,220 495,230 518,860 SB 140 Grant 35-3901 5880 SB 140 Grant Income 113,000 248,000 108,000 Total SB 140 Grant 113,000 248,000 108,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET EST!M AT! D REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS Account Oe$crtl~tien CENSUS 1990 = 104. 116,045 117,474 Land Maint Dst #1 Genera~ 40-3901 1020 40-3901 1040 40-3901 1060 40-3901 46O0 40-3901 8520 40-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Other Revenue Transfer In: From Fund Balance 837,710 903,500 904,880 41,140 26,300 30,000 8,230 5,260 5,260 35,580 19,290 55,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 201,680 293,760 312,060 Total LM D #1General 1,126,840 1,250,610 1,309,700 Land Maint Dst #2 Victoria 41-3901 1020 41-3901 1040 41-3901 1060 41-3901 4600 41-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax ~ PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LMD #2 Victoria 1,671,040 1,753,060 1,714,110 25,950 12,980 30,000 5,190 2,590 5,000 68,090 35,360 80,000 603,700 441,090 535,110 2,373,970 2,245,080 2,364,220 LMD 3A Prkwy So. of 6th IE. of 1-15 42-3901 1020 42-3901 4600 42-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y' Secured Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance 3,310 3,310 3,310 130 0 950 590 0 0 Total LMD #3A Parkway So. of 6th, E.of I- 4,030 3,310 4,260 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET E S TI MATED R IEV!E N UE $ POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104, 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS Land Maint Dst #4 Terra Vista 43-3901 1020 43-3901 1040 43-3901 1060 43-3901 4600 43-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LMD #4 Terra Vista 1,060,610 1,070,930 1,060,980 5,270 4,000 4,000 1,050 800 800 42,680 21,510 70,000 641,200 203,500 297,430 1,750,810 1,300,740 1,433,210 LMD #5 44-3901 1020 44-3901 1040 44-3901 1060 44-3901 4600 44-xxxx xxxx NE Corner 24th & Hermosa Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LMD #5 NE Corner 24th & Hermosa 4,880 4,930 4,830 50 50 0 10 10 0 200 1,000 1,300 2,350 0 0 7,490 5,990 6,130 Land Maint Dst #6 Caryn Community 45-3901 1020 45-3901 1040 45-3901 1060 45-3901 4600 45-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LMD #6 Caryn Community 299,210 298,560 296,120 4,340 3,500 3,500 870 700 700 12,180 6,050 21,000 92,860 67,610 74,150 409,460 376,420 395,470 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS Account De~gHp~oA CENSUS 1990 = 104. 116,045 117,474 Land Maint Dst #3B General industrial Area 46-3901 1020 46-3901 1040 46-3901 1060 46-3901 4600 46-3901 8520 46-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Other Revenue Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LMD #3B Gen'l Industrial Area 563,460 615,860 602,720 17,200 8,600 10,000 3,440 1,720 2,000 23,500 12,300 40,000 3,500 73,500 30,000 151,100 141,710 77,030 762,200 853,690 761,750 Land Maint Dst #7 North Eftwanda 47-3901 1020 47-3901 1040 47-3901 1060 47-3901 4600 47~xxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance 302,770 312,110 305,080 9,250 4,620 16,000 1,850 920 3,500 12,550 6,360 18,000 76,020 3,620 6,080 Total LMD #7 North Eftwanda 402,440 327,630 348,660 Land Maint Dst #8 South Etiwanda 48.3901 1020 48.3901 1040 48-3901 1060 48-3901 4600 48-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fund Balance 16,030 16,130 15,380 160 100 100 30 20 20 650 32O 1,600 1,440 0 0 Total LMD #8 South Etiwanda 18,310 16,570 17,100 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET EST!MAT D REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS Account Delcrll)tlon Lighting Dist #1 Arterial 55-3901 1020 55-3901 1040 55-3901 1060 55-3901 4600 55-3901 7250 55-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developer's Fee Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LD #1 Arterial 428,180 456,980 450,520 13,440 6,720 7,500 2,690 1,340 1,500 17,870 9,410 10,500 2,500 1,500 1,500 29,740 16,880 95,690 494,420 492,830 567,210 Lighting Dist #2 Residential 56-3901 1020 56-3901 1040 56-3901 1060 56-3901 4600 56-3901 7250 56~xxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developer's Fee Transfer In: From Fund 25 Reserves 241,100 254,240 354,700 7,620 3,810 4,500 1,520 760 1,500 5,050 1,500 1,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,510 0 0 Total LD #2 Residential 261,300 262,810 364,700 57-3901 57-3901 57-3901 57-3901 57-3901 57-xxxx Lighting Dist #3 Victoria 1020 1040 1060 4600 7250 XXXX Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developer Energizing Fee Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LD #3 Victoria 187,240 195,970 189,500 3,880 1,940 4,500 780 390 750 3,870 3,980 6,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 0 19,310 197,270 203,280 220,560 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS Account CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 116,045 117,474 'Amended : ,'~!,':d:... '. '.eud..~,~t~... :....~v,,u, "'~,~:'~.,.':.~:~.'::..i,/.':'~'~'~~ :'~ ' ~"'i ~ "::,:,~.',. ,.;,",' ~.. ~'~ ,".",;':.',:;:,;'. ':. ~.:. .' 58-3901 58-3901 58-3901 58-3901 58-3901 58-xxxx Lighting 1020 1040 1060 4600 7250 XXXX Dist #4 Terra Vista Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developerrs Fee Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LD #4 Terra Vista 96,200 98,150 96,480 940 470 470 190 90 90 3,950 7,500 15,000 1,500 0 0 0 2,280 13,450 102,780 108,490 125,490 59-3901 59-3901 59-3901 59-3901 59-xxxx Lighting Dist #5 Caryn Community 1020 1040 1060 4600 XXXX Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fun,d Balance 41,910 41,820 41,480 6OO 50O 5OO 120 100 100 1,700 1,300 4,750 9,780 10,760 17,650 Total LD #5 Caryn Community 54,110 54,480 64,480 60-3901 60-3901 60-3901 60-3901 60-3901 60-xxxx Lighting Dist #6 Industrial Area 1020 1040 1060 4600 7250 XXXX Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developer's fee Transfer In: From Fund Balance 76,530 81,720 81,670 1,930 960 1,500 390 190 250 3,150 1,670 3,900 30O 8OO 1,500 0 0 3,840 Total LD #6 Industrial Area 82,300 85,340 92,660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS Account De~' 'r. rtcl)fion . Amended Lighting Dist #7 North Eftwanda 61-3901 1020 61-3901 1040 61-3901 1060 61-3901 4600 61-3901 7250 61-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developer's fee Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total LD #7 North Eftwanda 17,900 22,020 21,800 2,220 500 1,500 440 100 250 820 1,000 3,900 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 21,380 24,620 28,450 Lighting Dist #8 South Eftwanda 62-3901 1020 62-3901 1040 62-3901 1060 62-3901 4600 62-3901 7250 Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Developer Energizing Fee Total LD #8 South Eftwanda 6,770 6,970 6,690 100 0 0 20 0 0 2,000 1,000 1,600 360 0 0 9,250 7,970 8,290 AD 89-1 Milliken S. Of Arrow Street & Drainage Improv. REDEMPTION FUND 64-3901 1020 64-3901 4600 64-xxxx xxxx Property Tax: C/Y Secured Interest Income Transfers In: From Fund Balance Total AD 89-1 Milliken So.of Arrow/Reder 493,240 492,080 492,080 14,800 9,840 1,200 0 1,930 10,570 508,040 503,850 503,850 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED RiEVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS AD 89-1 Milliken S. Of Arrow Street & Drainage Improv. RESERVE FUND 65-3901 4600 Interest Income 16,150 50,000 36,000 Total AD 89-1Milliken So.of Arrow/Reset 16,150 50,000 36,000 Vehicle and Equipment Replacement 72-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 280,000 606,040 662,660 72-3901 9002 Users Fees 679,310 954,020 1,118,690 Total Vehicle and Equipment Replaceme, 959,310 1,560,060 1,781,350 Benefit Contingent 73-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 60,000 193,300 222,650 Total Benefit Contingent Fund 60,000 193,300 222,650 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED ~VENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS Account Amended ', ~ Bl~dil .~K...d · Bedlletmd ',.:ReveitUB :, ', :. r . I ~ :"~ ' ' "" 'h -~ ' ~ ' ' ~ , - : ~ ~'~:',:~ ~ :.'~.~' ,,, ~, · .'~/~F~l;.y.~.'~,.p..~..~:.~.~/~;.~t~.~r,~.~ ... ,;"~ .:~ . ,.. -. , , . 74-3901 74-3901 Data Processing EquipJTechnology Replacement 4600 Interest Earnings 9002 User Fees 0 242,180 244,840 0 128,540 310,370 Total Data Process Equip/Tech. Replacer 0 370,720 555,210 CFD 88-2 Eftwanda/Highland 75-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 80,280 80,000 48,000 Total CFD 88-2 EtiwandlHighland Cap Pr( 80,280 80,000 48,000 CFD 88-2 Flood District(Redemp. Fund) 76-3901 1020 76-3901 1040 76-3901 1060 76-3901 46OO 76-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfer Out: To Fund 78 367,190 385,500 385,700 17,880 3,500 5,000 3,580 700 1,500 15,540 7,780 24,000 (240) (520) (520) Total CFD 88-2 Flood Dist/Redempt 403,950 396,960 415,680 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET EST!MATE D I~EVE N U ES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPEC~L FUNDS CFD 88-2 Reserve 77-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 20,000 11,320 24,000 Total CFD 88-2 Flood Dist/Reserve 20,000 11,320 24,000 CFD 88-2 Law Enforcement (Redemption Fund) 78-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 900 78-3992 8000 Transfers In From Other Funds & Fund B 14,100 400 900 520 0 Total CFD 88-2 Law Enforcement/Rdmpt 15,000 920 900 AD84-2 Alta Loma Channel i Improvement Fund 80-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 80-xxxx xxxx Transfer In: From Fund Balance 1,260 670 1,500 0 32,000 0 Total AD 84-2 Alta Loma Ch,annel/Improv 1,260 32,670 1,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATI~D REVEN U ES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104, 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS AD 84-2 Alta Loma Channel / Redemption 81-3901 1020 81-3901 1040 81-3901 1060 81-3901 4600 81-3992 8000 81-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - P/Y Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Transfers in: From Fund 82 Transfer in: From Fund Balance 166,150 165,500 161,820 7,390 3,700 12,000 1,480 740 7,500 7,800 3,480 6,500 7,000 4,250 9,000 13,690 0 0 Total AD 84-2 Alta Loma ChnllRedempt 203,510 177,670 196,820 AD 84-2 Alta Loma Channel / Reserve 82-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 82-xxxx xxxx Transfer In: From Fund Balance 7,970 4,250 0 0 0 9,000 Total AD 84-2 Alta Loma Chnl/Reserve 7,970 4,250 9,000 CFD 84-1 Day Creek 86-3901 4600 Interest Earnings (CD) 30,480 70,000 85,000 Total CFD 84-1 Day Creek/Cap Proj 30,480 70,000 85,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR, 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATE~D REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104, 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS ....... · :,,~ ~cco ..t a.~.~l~, . :'~ ~'~' '~:" ~'~ ~"~'.. CFD 84-1 Day Creek I Redemption 87-3901 1020 87-3901 1040 87-3901 1060 87-3901 4600 87-3901 7906 Property Tax - CfY Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Contributed Capital - RDA 897,360 871,670 892,480 23,580 5,000 5,000 4,720 1,000 1,000 38,510 37,550 20,000 1,000,000 975,000 975,000 Total CFD 84-1 Day ,CreeldRedempt 1,964,170 1,890,220 1,893,480 PD 85 Red Hill & Heritage / Redemption 90-3901 1020 90-3901 1040 90-3901 1060 90-3901 4600 90-3901 8520 90-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured Property Tax - PlY Secured Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings Other revenue Transfers In: From Fund Balance 1,505,080 1,636,670 1,612,610 58,890 39,440 39,440 11,780 7,890 7,890 47,720 34,290 28,000 15,000 15,000 19,100 213,540 190,900 207,660 Total PD 95 Red Hill & Heritage/Redempt 1,852,010 1,924,190 1,914,700 PD 85 Red Hill & Heritage / Reserve 91-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 37,940 32,000 42,000 Total PD 85 Red Hill & Heritage/Reserve 37,940 32,000 42,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS Acoou~lt CENSUS 1990 = 104,887 De~criptlon 116,045 117,474 Amended 93-3901 93-xxxx 93-xxxx AD 82-1R 6th St. Industrial / Redemption 4600 XXXX XXXX Interest Earnings Transfers In: 6/95=From Fd 94; '96=From Fd Bal Transfers In: From Fd Bal 0 12,000 14,000 0 95,350 96,360 0 534,140 583,190 Total AD 82-16th St. Industrial/Redempt 0 641,490 693,550 94-3901 94-xxxx 94-xxxx AD 82-1R 6th St. Industrial / Reserve 46O0 XXXX XXXX Interest Earnings Transfer In: From Fur~d Balance Transfer Out to Fund 93 0 0 2,500 0 652,410 746,270 0 0 (96,360) Total AD 82-1R 6th St.lndustrial/Rsrv 0 652,410 652,410 95-3901 95-xxxx AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District 4600 Interest Earnings xxxx Transfer In: From Fund Balance 2,000 6,680 15,000 50,000 337,410 0 Total AD 86-2 RC Drainage Dist/Ca:p Proj 52,000 344,090 15,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS CENSUS 1990 = 104. 116,045 117,474 Account Amended B,.tfdg.tM. d.,~ .,~,u<lB~tncl, .Reyenue AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District / Redemptioq 96-3901 1020 96-3901 1040 96-3901 1060 96-3901 4600 96-xxxx xxxx Property Tax - C/Y Secured 185,530 201,790 192,230 Property Tax. P/Y Secured 7,920 9,250 5,000 Penalty & Interest 1,580 1,850 350 Interest Earnings 7,800 4,260 8,000 Transfers In: 6/95=From Fd 97; '96=From 60,000 0 0 Total AD 86-2 RC Drainage Dist/Redempt 262,830 217,150 205,580 AD 86-2 R/C Drainage District ! Reserve 97-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 97-xxxx xxxx Transfer In: From Fund Balance 10,460 8,000 8,500 75,000 0 0 Total AD 86-2 RC Drainage Dist/Rsrv 85,460 8,000 8,500 Used Oil Recycling Grant 110-3901 5880 Grant Income 36,110 41,700 31,000 Total Used Oil Recycling Grant: 36,110 41,700 31,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS ~.i ~i~.. i[~?Hi.[~'/:.~'J:~i~ :~i!i.:ii'[i :'!~ii~',i,~! :J . Account CENSUS 1990 = 104, 116,045 117,474 Amended Bu,~geled,, ~.ud~etp~ ReVenue California Literacy Campaign Grant / Library 111-3901 5880 111-3901 xxxx 111-3901 xxxx 111-xxxx xxxx Grant Income Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation Outside Grant Support Transfer In: From Fund Balance 96,970 70,820 70,820 0 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 5,000 0 0 3,960 Total Calif, Literacy Campaign Grant 96,970 90,820 89,780 Major Urban Resource Library Grant 113-3901 5880 GrantIncome 13,000 13,000 13,000 Total Major Urban Resource Library Gran 13,000 13,000 13,000 Universal COPS Grant 114-3901 5880 Grant Income 150,000 125,000 125,000 Total Universal COPS Grant 150,000 125,000 125,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS Account - De~ril~on' :. Amended · . ,Bu~l~_J~d: ,..~i,mJ., ,_~i~. ted.:.. R.' " .' ", "~.'~': ~'~:~' ",:.' ",Z '= * "~ ~.'~"~-E:~. COPS More Grant 115-3901 5880 Grant Income 79,540 0 0 Total COPS More Grant 79,540 0 0 Supplemental Law Enforcement (SLEF) Grant 117-3901 4600 117-3901 5880 117-xxxx xxxx Interest Income Grant Income Transfer In: From Fund Balance Total Supplement Law Enforcement (SLE 15,740 0 20,850 269,780 258,090 280,880 0 0 125,050 285,520 258,090 426,780 Adult Education Act P.L.. 100-297 118-3901 5880 Grant Income 3,500 3,500 3,500 Total Adult Education Act P.L. 100-297 3,500 3,500 3,500 Grandparents With Books Grant 119-3901 5880 Grant Income 5,000 0 0 Total Grandparents With Books Grant 5,000 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET POPULATION ESTIMATES: SPECIAL FUNDS Account CENSUS 1990 = 104. 116,045 117,474 Amended · B'u..dg~., ~ B~dg~ed' Re,venue ..:. 'ae."., '~..:,.' ~.".v~'~.e '::. :.. "'..~.s.~.~L:Y/~i.'~,,~i~Y~'~ ,F~I Y~ar ,'' ~?-~ '~i:'~':~"~,~'~',M'. '. Drainage Area No.91-2: Day Canyon Drainage Basin 122-3901 1020 122-3901 1040 122-3901 1060 122-3901 4600 Property Tax: Current Year Secured Property Tax: Prior Year Secured Property Tax: Penalty & Interest Interest Earnings 32,260 28,700 28,390 0 50 4,000 0 10 750 650 570 1,800 Total DrainageNo.91.2 Day Cnyn Dr. Basir 32,910 29,330 34,940 CFD 93-3 Foothill Marketplace 125.3901 1020 Property Tax: Current Year Secured 125-3901 4600 Interest Earnings 432,500 432,500 432,500 8,650 5,800 6,000 Total CFD 93-3 Foothill Marketplace 441,150 438,300 438,500 AD 93-1 131-3901 1020 131-3901 4600 131-3901 7441 Masi Commerce Center Property Tax: Current Year Secured Interest Earnings Developer Participation Fee 0 238,600 238,730 0 2,300 500 25,000 0 0 Total AD 93-1 Mast Commerce Center 25,000 240,900 239,230 Senior Outreach 132-3901 5880 Grant Income 0 0 3,000 Total Senior Outreach 0 0 3,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATE~ REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS 'Amended Community Skate Park 133-3901 1510 Private Contributions 133-3901 2465 Activity Revenues/Concessions 133-3901 2475 Activity Revenues/Ticket Sales 2,000 0 0 500 0 0 10,000 0 0 Total Community Skate Park 12,500 0 0 AfferSchoolTeen Program 134-3901 5880 GrantIncome 0 0 29,550 Total After School Teen Program 0 29,550 Universal COPS Grant '98 139-3901 5880 Grant Income 0 150,000 150,000 Total Universal COPS Grant '98 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant '98 0 150,000 150,000 141-3901 5880 Grant Income 0 0 92,320 Total Local Law Enforcement Block Graf 0 0 92,320 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET ESTIMATED REVENUES POPULATION ESTIMATES: CENSUS 1990 = 104 116,045 117,474 SPECIAL FUNDS South Etiwanda Assessment Dist. Formation (NEW) 150-3901 7441 Developer Participation Fee 0 0 145,000 Total So. Eftwand Assess. Dist. Formation 0 0 145,000 TOTAL SPECIAL FUNDS 38.090.360 43.~!7.660 40.732.810 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS (INCLUDES FUND 01) 70.088.900 77.638.560 76.472.630 City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Fiscal Year 1998/99 Budget EXP ,,ES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET FUND 01 FUND 02 FUND 03 FUND 05 FUND 06 FUND 07 FUND 08 FUND 09 FUND 10 FUND 12 FUND 13 FUND 14 FUND 16 FUND 19 FUND 20 FUND 21 FUND 22 FUND 23 FUND 24 FUND 25 FUND 26 FUND 28 FUND 32 FUND 33 FUND 35 FUND 40 FUND 41 FUND 42 FUND 43 FUND 44 FUND 45 FUND 46 FUND 47 FUND 48 FUND 55 FUND 56 FUND 57 FUND 58 FUND 59 GENERAL LIBRARY REIMBISTATE COUNTY PRKG CIT SPORTS COMPLEX CCWD CALTRANS AGREEMENT S.B. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AGREEMENT GAS TAX 2106, 2107 & 2107.5 PROPOSITION 111 TDA ARTICLE 8 FUNDS COMM SRVCS-RECREATION AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT PED.GRANT/ART.3 DRAINAGE / ETIWANDA PARK DEVELOPMENT BEAUTIFICATION FUND SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE: GEN'L CITY F.A.U. I ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CAPITAL RESERVE FUND R-Z'BERG GRANT FUND C.D.B.G. FUND MEASURE I SPECIAL 131STRICTS ADMIN SB 140 LMD #1 GENERAL LMD #2 VICTORIA LMD #3A PRKVVY SO. OF 6TH ST. E.OF 1-15 LMD ~ TERRA VISTA LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY' LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA SLD #1 ARTERIAL SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL SLD #3 VICTORIA SLD #4 TERRA VISTA SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY SUMMARY BY FUND 31,998,540 1,304,800 8,500 1,352,830 27,570 20,850 69,320 1,556,440 1,878,250 218,160 1,294,310 205,340 84,000 25,630 492,400 772,550 2,154,380 142,320 4,444,000 428,500 29,090 1~841,100 1,706,000 478,220 113,000 1,126,840 2,373,970 4,030 1,750,810 7,490 409,460 762,200 402,440 18,310 494,420 261,300 177,050 75,640 54,110 33,920,900 1,337,120 16,000 1,359,970 54,900 52,040 64,610 1,610,560 1,525,090 64,000 1,437,040 178,200 89,000 20,000 630,350 545,440 3,149,410 518,550 6,456,000 1,097,470 0 1,041,550 2,827,820 495,230 248,000 1,250,610 2,400,080 3,120 1,429,740 3,340 376,420 948,690 354,630 15,090 492,830 262,810 178,740 108,490 54,480 35,192,100 1,309,420 16,000 1,362,520 284,900 50,540 64,610 1,661,030 1,635,320 189,180 1,185,760 178,650 4,000 95,000 1,212,000 684,480 2,446,250 686,050 485,000 510,000 0 779,340 5,077,360 518,860 108,000 1,309,700 2,364,220 2,980 1,433,210 4,790 395,470 761,750 348,660 16,620 567,210 332,810 220,560 125,490 64,480 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION FUND 60 FUND 61 FUND 62 FUND 64 FUND 72 FUND 74 FUND 75 FUND 76 FUND 78 FUND 81 FUND 82 FUND 83 FUND 87 FUND 90 FUND 93 FUND 94 FUND 95 FUND 96 FUND 97 FUND 109 FUND 110 FUND 111 FUND 113 FUND 114 FUND 115 FUND 116 FUND 117 FUND 118 FUND 119 FUND 122 FUND 125 FUND 131 FUND 132 FUND 133 FUND 134 FUND 135 FUND 136 FUND 139 FUND 140 FUND 141 FUND 150 FUND 151 SUMMARY BY FUND SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO OF ARROW / REDEMP. INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: Equip. Replacemen[ INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: Computer Equip. Replacement CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROY. CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HtGHLAND IMPROV.:FIood AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL; REDEMP~rlON AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVE AD 82-1R 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL: IMPROW CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK REDEMPTION FUND PD 85 RED HILL & HERITAGE: REDMPT AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: REDEMPTION AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: RESERVE AD 86-2 RIC DRAINAGE DIST.: IMPROV. AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: REDMPT AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: RESERVE FUND METROLINK MAINT. & SECURITY PROGRAM USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN GRANI' MAJOR URBAN LIBRARY RESOURCE GRANT UNIVERSAL COPS GRANT COPS MORE GRANT LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BL()CK GRANT SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLEF) GRANT ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT GRANDPARENTS WITH BOOKS GRANT AD 91-2 REDEMPTION CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER SENIOR OUTREACH PROGRAM GRANT COMMUNITY SKATE PARK TEEN AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM GRANT CA STATE LIBRARY FOUNDATION GRANT LIBRARY SERVICES & TECHNOLOGIES ACT COPS UNIVERSAL GRANT '98 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMEN.[' BLOCK GRANT 97 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMEN'[' BLOCK GRANT 98 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD GRAND TOTALALLFUNDS 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 48,370 17,460 4,060 504,760 135,000 0 0 334,280 15,000 202,580 7,000 47,710 1,862,110 1,699,010 1,055,500 625,030 50~500 258,080 82,930 0 36,110 96,970 13,000 150,000 79,540 0 269,790 3,500 5,000 32,9i0 426,890 25,000 0 10,080 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,662,340 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 81,460 18,160 3,960 503,850 954,830 317,660 0 332,870 0 140,590 4,250 5,000 1,873,480 1,984,790 641,490 652,410 344,090 174,460 0 0 39,000 89,130 13,000 125,000 0 0 258,090 3,500 0 27,790 429,720 238,680 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 76,025,580 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 92,660 18,160 3,960 503,850 949,430 322,860 0 332,870 0 140,590 9,000 0 1,783,500 1,914,700 693,550 652,410 0 172,490 0 0 31,000 89,780 13,000 125,000 0 0 426,780 3,500 0 27,790 429,720 238,680 3,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 92,320 77,500 72,982,420 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4110 014122 01 4125 01-4126 01-4127 01-4150 014151 014152 014153 01-4154 01 4155 01-4156 01 4157 014160 014161 014162 01 4245 01 4265 DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET GENERAL FUND SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER DISASTER PREPAREDNESS CITY CLERK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FINANCE! BUSINESS LICENSING PURCHASING RISK MANAGEMENT TREASURY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL FIRE DISTRICT RES. SRVCS - GEO INFO SYSTEM RES. SRVCS - MGMT INFO SYSTEM ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES CITY FACILITIES PERSONNEL OVERHEAD 70,950 72,570 80,150 486,820 502,420 525,880 210,730 220,100 206,910 368,990 506,780 539,590 718,040 883,560 883,560 362,500 378,840 378,840 525,220 524,590 515,080 181,340 178,350 191,800 190,350 198,240 219,470 138,070 142,030 110,260 3,920 4,630 4,630 227,740 232,850 238,030 138,640 124,730 124,820 213,570 211,040 239,540 1,179,670 1,197,570 1,570,100 347,630 343,580 343,580 2,219,030 1,251,770 1,321,860 73,700 78,700 85,700 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4285 01-4313 01-4333 01-4353 01-4373 01-4451 01-4532 01-4540 01-4637 01-4638 01-4639 01-4640 01-4641 01-4645 01-4646 01-4647 01-4648 01-4650 01-4991 DESCRIPTION GENERAL OVERHEAD COMMUNITY DEr ADMIN PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION BUILDING & SAFETY POLICE DEPT COMMUNITY SERVICES PARK/REC COMMISSION ENGINEERING-ADMIN ENG - DEVEL MGMT ENG - TRAFFIC MGMT ENG - PROJECT MGMT ENG - CONSTR MGMT ENG: NPDES PROGRAM COMM DEV/MNT VEH & EQ COMM DEVlMNT.PUB.WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT TRANSFERS 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1,743,280 1,487,060 1,282,630 192,370 204,170 210,690 1,156,980 1,299,330 2,022,790 17,250 17,250 11,730 1,933,350 1,990,980 2,007,650 10,645,200 10,957,690 10,389,500 1,313,130 1,414,120 1,504,990 1,570 1,570 1,570 251,890 335,320 353,110 873,270 1,012,730 1,108,690 245,650 180,440 184,550 122,250 113,480 116,210 310,970 298,990 308,690 417,900 397,050 404,160 925,910 932,270 1,027,860 2,867,020 3,273,750 3,665,110 0 1,532,500 1,579,640 518,510 504,650 517,530 805,130 915,200 915,200 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 31,996,540 33,920,900 35,192,100 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4110 01-4110-1100 01-4110-1900 01-4110-3100 01-4110-3300 01-4110-3900 01-4110-3960 01-4110-6028 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 36,000 13,320 13,640 5O0 4,280 210 3,000 36,000 13,320 15,240 500 4,28O 23O 3,000 45,200 13,320 13,640 5OO 4,280 210 3,000 01-4110 TOTAL: 01-4122 01-4122-1100 01-4122-1900 01-4122-3100 01-4122-3300 01-4122-3900 01-4122-3931 01-4122-3932 01-4122-3956 01-4122-3960 01-4122-6028 01-4122-7047 CITY MANAGER REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMEN*[ 70,950 307,060 132,040 9,950 7,450 8,510 1,200 86O 3,330 420 11,000 5,000 72,570 329,360 121,860 10,950 9,610 9,750 1,200 850 3,330 510 15,000 0 80,150 338,200 121,860 15,600 9,610 11,750 9,550 85O 3,330 510 8,350 6,270 01-4122 TOTAL: 486,820 502,420 525,880 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4125 01-4125-1100 01-4125-1300 01-4125-190O 01-4125-3100 01-4125-3900 01-4125-3915 01-4125-3931 01-4125-3932 01-4125-3956 01-4125-3960 01-4125-6020 D 1-4125-6028 01-4125-6035 01-4125-7044 01-4125-7047 DISASTER PREPAREDNESS REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MEETINGS & TRAVEL MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY HAZARD,WASTE REMOVAL CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: REIMBURSABLE CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 101,690 0 43,730 1,860 18,330 12,750 1,650 2,840 28O 65O 10,000 3,950 13,000 0 0 106,330 0 39,340 1,860 24,330 12,750 1,640 3,560 28O 740 10,000 4,270 15,000 0 0 93,140 0 39,340 1,860 24,330 12,750 1,640 3,560 28O 740 10,000 4,270 15,000 0 0 01-4125 TOTAL: 210,730 220,100 206,910 01-4126 01-4126-1100 01-4126-1200 01-4126-1300 01-4126-1900 01-4126-3100 01-4126-3300 01-4126-3900 01-4126-3932 01-4126-3950 01-4126-3956 01-4126-3960 01-4126-6028 01-4126-7044 01-4126-7047 CITY CLERK REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITIES CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER E(3UlPMENT 182,820 1,500 10,900 79,480 2,650 0 41,900 17,800 0 710 930 30,300 0 0 212,200 1,500 12,170 78,750 4,410 4,200 41,900 18,110 0 960 1,580 88,500 40,OOO 2,500 196,000 !,200 29,060 78,750 2,630 4,200 41,900 18,110 0 96O 1,580 116,500 44,000 4,700 01-4126 TOTAL: 368,990 506,780 539,590 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4127 01-4127 -1100 01-4127-1200 01-4127-1300 01-4127-1900 01-4127-3100 01-4127 -3300 01-4127-3960 01-4127-6028 01-4127-7047 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATION REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PAYROLL PART TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 493,650 0 212,270 3,000 120 9,000 0 641,840 0 0 237,480 4,20O 4O 0 0 641,840 0 0 237,480 0 4,200 40 0 0 01-4127 TOTAL: 718,040 883,560 883,560 01-4150 01-4150-1100 01-4150-1200 01-4t 50-1300 01-4150-1900 01-4150-3100 01-4150-3300 01-4150-3900 01-4150-3932 01-4150-3956 01-4150-3960 01-4150-6028 01-4150-7047 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME. PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITIES CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 196,940 300 28,770 89,000 3,050 3,500 6,300 5,870 3OO 470 28,000 0 216,230 300 28,770 82,600 5,550 4,700 8,300 3,390 5OO 500 28,000 0 216,230 750 28,320 82,600 5,050 4,700 8,300 3,390 5OO 500 28,000 50O 01-4150 TOTAL: 362,500 378,840 378,840 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4151 01-4151-1100 01-4151-1200 01-4151-1300 01.4151-1900 01-4151-3100 01-4151-3300 01-4151-3900 01-4151-3932 01-4151-3933 01-4151-3956 01-4151-3960 01-4151-6028 01-4151-7044 01-4151-7047 FINANCE REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 318,660 2,000 0 137,020 3,900 3,250 21,450 2,040 380 1,300 670 34,550 0 0 332,720 2,000 12,240 123,350 3,900 4,450 21,650 8,360 380 1,450 540 13,550 0 0 328,630 1,000 12,240 123,350 5,530 4,300 22,080 8,760 0 1,300 540 7,350 0 0 01-4151 TOTAL: 525,220 524,590 515,080 01-4152 01-4152-1100 01-4152-1300 01-4152-1900 01-4152-3100 01-4152-3300 01-4152-3900 01-4152-3932 01-4152-3956 01-4152-3960 01-4152-6028 01.-4152-7045 01-4152-7047 BUSINESS LICENSING REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAWVEHICLES C/O: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 118,870 0 51,110 800 300 8,000 1,800 50 110 300 0 120,310 3,000 44,570 800 30O 7,500 1,420 50 100 300 0 122,310 100 44,570 100 200 5,000 1,420 0 100 0 18,000 0 01-4152 TOTAL: 181,340 178,350 191,800 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 014153 01-4153-1100 01-4153-1300 01-4153-1900 014153-3100 01 4153-3300 01 4153-3900 01-4153-3932 01 4153-3956 01 4153-3960 01-4153-6028 01 4153-7047 PURCHASING REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 123,350 0 53,040 1,300 500 9,480 2,270 270 140 0 134,670 0 49,830 2,100 5O0 9,130 1,570 3OO 140 0 134,350 0 49,830 1,500 5O 6,680 1,570 350 140 25,000 0 01-4153 TOTAL: 190,350 198,240 219,470 014154 01-4154-1100 01-4154-1300 014154-1900 014154-3100 014154-3900 01-4154-3932 01-4154-3956 01-4154-3960 01-4154-6028 014154-7047 RISK MANAGEMENT REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 60,070 25,830 1,300 6,550 350 450 520 43,000 0 64,610 0 23,910 1,300 7,300 430 450 53O 43,500 0 38,500 0 23,910 100 1,000 430 450 53O 43,500 1,840 01-4154 TOTAL: 138,070 142,030 110,260 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4155 01-4155-1100 01-4155-1900 01-4155-3100 01-4155-3900 01-4155-3956 01-4155-3960 01-4155 -6028 CITY TREASURER REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL& MEETINGS MAINT.& OPER. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERALLIABILITY CONTRACTSERVrCES 610 230 1,350 650 400 30 650 610 230 1,350 1,400 200 40 800 610 230 1,350 1,400 200 40 800 01-4155 TOTAL: 3,920 4,630 4,630 01-4156 01-4156-1100 01-4156-1200 01-4156-1900 01-4156-3100 01-4156-3300 01-4156-3900 01-4156-3932 01-4156-3956 01-4156-3960 01-4156 -6028 01-4156-7047 PERSONNEL REGULAR SALARY OVERTIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMEN'r 126,770 54,510 1,900 100 38,300 5,450 25O 460 0 0 135,760 0 50,230 1,500 100 42,000 2,550 250 460 0 0 137,500 1,600 50,230 1,500 100 42,000 2,550 250 460 0 1,840 01-4156 TOTAL: 227,740 232,850 238,030 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL, YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4157 01-4157-1100 01-4157-1200 01-4157-1300 01-4157-1900 01-4157-3900 01-4157-3933 01-4157-3960 01-4157-6028 01-4157-7047 FIRE DISTRICT REGULAR SALARIES OVER-TIME PAYROLL PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY:: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 84,900 0 11,320 37,420 570 38O 5O 4,000 0 90,770 0 0 33,580 0 380 0 0 0 91,240 0 0 33,580 0 0 0 0 0 01-4157 TOTAL: 138,640 124,730 124,820 01-4160 01-4160-1100 01-4160-1300 01-4160-1900 01-4160-3100 01-4160-3900 01-4160-3932 01-4160-3956 01-4160-3960 01-4160-6028 01-4160-7047 RES. SRVCS - GEO INFO SYSTEM REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT: MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 100,680 0 43,290 3,000 33,050 290 320 690 32,250 0 110,760 9,100 41,800 3,000 11,050 290 340 490 34,210 0 110,760 0 41,800 3,000 34,680 290 340 86O 47,810 0 01-4160 TOTAL: 213,570 211,040 239,540 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01-4161 01-4161-1100 01-4161-1200 01-4161-1900 01-4161-3100 01-4161-3900 01-4161-3932 01-4161-3956 01-4161-3960 01-4161-6028 01-4161-7047 RES. SRVCS - MGMT INFO SYSTEM REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT' 387,940 424,320 423,530 0 8,800 5,8OO 166,810 157,000 157,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 92,450 146,550 198,650 9,200 31,280 216,360 1,000 1,300 900 5,070 6,010 6,010 401,700 419,310 419,310 112,500 0 139,540 01-4161 TOTAL: 1,179,670 1,197,570 1,570,100 01-4162 01-4162-1100 01-4162-1900 01-4162-3900 01-4162-3913 01-4162-3914 01-4162-3932 01-4162-3960 01-4162-6028 01-4162-6036 01-4162-8019 01-4162-8020 01-4162-8021 01-4162-8022 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: Landscape MAINT & OPERATIONS: City Facilities EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SEFUCITY FAClLITIESIMAINT TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 8,400 0 0 3,610 0 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,500 12,650 12,650 2,000 0 0 0 4,530 4,530 3,320 3,400 3,400 273,400 273,400 273,400 9,800 0 0 4,400 4,400 4,400 3,200 3,200 3,200 4,000 4,000 4,000 20,000 33,000 33,000 01-4162 TOTAL: 347,630 343,580 343,580 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4245 01-4245-1100 01-4245-1200 01-4245-1300 01-4245-1900 01-4245 -3900 01-4245-3914 01-4245-3932 01-4245-3956 01-4245-3960 01-4245-6028 01-4245-6036 01-4245-8019 01-4245-8020 01-4245-8021 01-4245-8022 01-4245-7043 01-4245-7044 01-4245-7047 0'1-4245-xxxx CITY FACILITIES REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MAINT. & OPS: City FacilitieslMaint. Dept. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: City Facilities/Maint. Dept~ TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITI ES ELECTRIC UTILITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIP. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 309,690 5,000 10,420 134,000 194,280 73,110 19,260 52O 16,750 153,560 452,020 255,140 33,150 26,890 466,950 8,000 60~290 0 0 0 o 0 0 157,000 o 73,710 0 12,060 161,o10 0 275,000 34,000 30,000 475,000 0 33,990 o o 0 0 0 o 158,760 0 79,890 0 12,060 223,760 0 275,0oo 34,000 30,000 475,0o0 0 33,390 o o Ol-4245 TOTAL: 01-4265 01-4265-2100 01-4265-2200 01-4265-2300 01-4265-2400 01-4265-2800 01-4265-3962 01-4265-3963 01-4265-3965 01-4265-3966 01-4265-3967 01-4265-3969 01-4265-3970 01-4265-3975 01-4265-6028 PERSONNEL OVERHEAD COFFEE CONTRIBUTION BUSINESS LICENSES TUITION REIMBURSEMNT EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT P.E.R.S. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WORKER'S COMPENSATION MEDICAL INSURANCE L/T DISABILITY/LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE OPTICAL INSURANCE MEDICARE SAFETY FOOTWEAR CONTRACT SERVICES 2,219,030 1,200 0 5,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,500 0 1,251,770 1,200 5,000 52,500 0 20,000 1,321,860 1,200 0 4,500 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 01-4265 TOTAL: 73,700 78,700 85,700 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01-4285 01-4285-3100 01-4285-3300 01-4285-3900 01-4285-3956 01-4285~3958 01-4285-3959 01-4285-3961 01-4285-3973 01-4285-3974 01-4285-6028 GENERAL OVERHEAD TRAVEL & MEETING MILEAGE MAINT. & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS AUTOMOBILE INSUR FIRE INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY BOOKING FEESISB2557 PROP.TAX ADMIN/SB2557 CONTRACT SERVICES 18,000 18,000 13,000 12,000 18,000 21,000 6~500 6,500 5,000 30,980 31,230 30,490 35,000 35,000 21,000 20,000 20,000 11,760 700,000 432,530 348,800 415,000 415,000 400,000 35,000 35,000 40,480 470,800 475,800 391,100 01-4285 TOTAL: 1,743,280 1,487,060 1,282,630 01-4313 01-4313-1100 01-4313-1900 01-4313-3100 01-4313-3300 01-4313-3900 01-4313-3932 01-4313-3956 01-4313-3960 01-4313-6028 01-4313-7044 01-4313-7047 COMMUNITY DEV ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT: MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 124,460 136,010 139,000 53,520 50,320 50,320 1,550 6,010 6,010 3,000 4,200 4,200 8,300 5,300 8,800 540 540 54O 800 1,550 1,550 140 180 210 80 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 01-4313 TOTAL: 192,370 204,170 210,690 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01.4333 01-4333-1100 01-4333-1300 01-4333-1900 01-4333-3100 01-4333-3300 01-4333-3900 01-4333-3932 01-4333-3950 01-4333-3956 01-4333-3960 01-4333-6028 01-4333-6035 01-4333-7043 01-4333 -7044 01-4333-7047 PLANNING REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXPENDITURES-BLDG IMPROV CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER I;~QUIPMENT 711,810 737,900 710,000 0 23,040 23,040 306,080 273,480 273,480 4,740 4,890 4,890 3,570 4,770 4,770 28,400 31,200 28,680 7,640 7,070 8,250 5,410 1,280 1,280 1,270 1,400 2,640 2,710 37,060 13,060 686,320 55,000 200,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,970 01-4333 TOTAL: 1,156,980 1,299,330 2,022,790 01-4353 01-4353-1100 01-4353 -3100 01-4353-3900 01-4353-3960 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR SALARIES TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERALLIABILITY 6,040 6,040 6,000 10,800 10,800 5,320 300 300 300 110 110 110 01-4353 TOTAL: 17,250 17,250 11,730 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01 4373 01-4373-1100 01-4373-1200 01-4373-1300 01-4373-1900 01-4373-3100 01-4373-3300 01-4373-3900 01-4373-3931 01-4373-3932 01-4373-3956 01-4373-3960 01-4373-6028 01-4373-6035 01-4373-7044 01-4373-7045 01-4373-7047 BUILDING & SAFETY REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PAYROLL PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTION GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES/REIMBURSEABLE CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1,143,490 1,194,280 1,191,000 0 0 40,000 40,000 15,000 497,700 445,480 445,480 1,600 1,900 2,950 3,000 4,200 4,200 31,000 33,450 32,400 6,800 6,800 12,060 16,410 12,570 12,570 1,040 1,330 1,330 2,500 3,080 3,080 144,810 132,890 132,890 45,000 115,000 153,400 0 0 1,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 01-4373 TOTAL: 1,933,350 1,990,980 2,007,650 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4451 01-4451-1100 01-4451-1200 01-4451-1300 01-4451-1900 0t-4451-3100 01-4451-3110 01~451-3900 01-4451-3909 01~1451-3910 01-4451-3930 01-4451-3931 01-4451-3932 01-4451-3935 01-4451-3956 01~451-6028 01-4451-6030 01-4451-7044 01-4451-7047 POLICE DEPT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS TRAVEL & MEETINGS ~ D.A.R.E. MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS/RESERVE PROGRAM MAINT & OPS ~ D.A.R.E. PROGRAM FUEL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION VEHICLE & EQUIP MAINT~D.A.R~E DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES \ D.A.R.E. CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 36,360 0 114,770 24,810 5,250 6,400 60,000 10,000 35,300 90,000 197,920 33,890 5,980 5,060 9,842,420 164,470 12,570 0 38,080 0 134,400 16,780 5,750 6,400 60,000 10,000 35,300 100,00o 21o,260 49,230 5,980 5,06O 10,107,160 160,720 12,570 0 23,000 0 130,000 16,780 5,750 6,400 81,710 10,000 40,000 100,000 210,260 51,350 5,980 5,060 9,468,180 160,720 64,600 9,710 01-4451 TOTAL: 10,645,200 10,957,690 10,389,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4532 01-4532-1100 01-4532-1300 01-4532-1300 01-4532-1900 01-4532-1900 01-4532 -3100 01-4532-3300 01-4532-3900 01-4532-3915 01-4532-3931 01-4532-3932 01-4532-3956 01-4532-3960 01-4532-6028 01-4532-7043 01-4532-7044 01-4532-7045 01-4532-7047 COMMUNITY SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES REG PART-TIME SAL FRINGE BEN - REG SAL FRINGE BEN - PIT SAL TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES-VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 603,140 169,830 13,430 259,350 16,410 3,400 4,430 184,870 20,880 1,050 17,140 1,790 2,450 10,960 0 0 0 4,OO0 644,030 245,330 13,440 238,290 7,450 4,560 5,800 116,480 35,380 1,050 9,230 1,640 2,630 88,810 0 0 0 655,970 218,440 13,830 253,100 7,450 5,000 6,000 125,420 38,970 1,050 11,190 1,640 2,700 89,610 3,170 9,800 40,000 2t ,650 01-4532 TOTAL: 01-4540 01-4540-3100 01-4540-3900 01-4540-3956 01-4540-3960 01-4540 TOTAL: PARK/REC. COMMISSION TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABIL[TY 1,313,130 75O 35O 45O 2O 1,570 1,414,120 750 35O 450 2O 1,570 1,504,990 750 35O 450 2O 1,570 7/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01-4637 01-4637-1100 01-4637-1300 01-4637-1900 01-4637-3100 01-4637-3300 01-4637-3900 01-4637 -3931 01-4637-3932 01-4637-3950 01-4637-3956 01-4637-3960 01-4637 -6028 01-4637-7044 O1-4637-7047 ENGINEERING ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 157,640 214,130 221,550 0 0 0 67,790 79,230 79,230 4,960 4,960 4,960 3,000 4,200 4,200 11,170 12,170 12,170 0 0 0 2,160 2,330 5,000 7,600 910 910 910 260 390 490 4,000 14,400 14,400 0 0 0 0 2,600 2,600 01-4637 TOTAL: 251,890 335,320 353,110 01-4638 01-4638-1100 01-4638-1900 01-4638-3100 01-4638-3900 01-4638-3932 01-4638-3956 01-4638-3960 01-4638-6028 01-4638-6035 01-4638-7044 01-4638-7047 ENG-DEVELOPMENT MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT: MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: REIMBURSABLE CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIP~ 523,680 547,570 566,530 225,180 202,600 202,600 740 740 740 12,920 3,800 3,800 2,980 4,400 4,400 1,020 1,020 1,020 1,050 2,600 2,600 2,500 50,000 75,000 85,000 200,000 252,000 4,OOO 0 0 14,200 0 0 01-4638 TOTAL: 873,270 1,012,730 1,108,690 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4639 01-4639-1100 01-4639-1900 01-4639-3100 01-4639-3900 01-4639-3931 01-4639-3932 01.4639-3956 01-4639-3960 01-4639-6028 01.4639-7047 ENG~TRAFFIC MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 114,960 49,430 910 71,810 0 2,210 53O 8O0 5,000 0 118,370 43,800 1,810 7,580 0 2,690 1,000 190 5,000 0 122,470 43,800 86O 8,480 0 2,690 1,060 190 5,000 0 01-4639 TOTAL: 245,650 180,440 184,550 01-4640 01-4640-1100 01-4640-1900 01-4640-3100 01-4640-3900 01-4640-3956 01-4640-3960 ENG-PROJECT MGMT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY 81,920 35,230 100 4,500 450 5O 78,740 29,130 100 5,000 450 6O 81,470 29,130 100 5,000 450 60 01-4640 TOTAL: 122,250 113,480 116,210 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4641 01-4641-1100 01-4641-1200 01-4641-1900 01-4641-3100 01-4641-3900 01-4641-3931 01-4641-3932 01-4641-3956 01-4641-3960 01-4641-6028 ENG-CONSTRUCTN MGMT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 201,660 200 86,710 730 14,340 2,800 2,160 150 220 2,000 210,880 200 78,030 730 3,000 2,800 1,100 150 100 2,000 218,180 2,00O 78,030 730 3,600 2,800 1,100 150 100 2,000 01-4641 TOTAL: 310,970 298,990 308,690 01-4645 01-4645-1100 01-4645-1200 01-4645-1900 01-4645-3100 01-4645-3900 01-4645-3931 01-4645-3956 01-4645-3960 01-4645-6028 01-4645-7043 01-4645-7044 01-4645-7045 ENG.: NPDES PROGRAM (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY/BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES 183,500 15,000 78,910 0 51,950 0 0 1,040 52,000 9,000 26,500 190,930 10,000 70,640 0 40,000 0 2,000 980 56,000 0 26,500 197,540 10,000 70,640 5OO 40,000 0 2,000 98O 56,000 0 0 26,500 01-4645 TOTAL: 417,900 397,050 404,160 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01-4646 01-4646-1100 01-4646-1200 01-4646-1900 01-4646-3100 01-4646-3900 01-4646-3930 01-4646-3931 01-4646-3932 01-4646-3960 01-4646-6028 01-4646-7043 01-4646-7044 01-4646-7045 COMMUNITY DEV. - MAINT.VEHICLES & EQUIP. REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT. & OPERATIONS FUEL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - VEHICLES 169,490 178,540 184,720 8,000 8,000 8,000 72,880 66,060 66,060 800 1,750 1,750 51,000 56,000 57,500 125,000 130,000 130,000 348,270 399,950 401,620 54,280 35,240 38,000 6,190 6,730 6,730 40,000 50,000 50,000 24,500 0 58,760 25,500 0 24,720 0 0 01-4646 TOTAL: 925,910 932,270 1,027,860 7,5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4647 01-4647-1100 01-4647-1200 01-4647-1300 01-4647-1900 01-4647-3100 01-4647-3900 01-4647-3914 01-4647-3931 01-4647-3932 01-4647-3933 01-4647-3950 01-4647-3956 01-4647-3960 01-4647-6027 01-4647-6028 01-4647-6036 01-4647 -8019 01-4647-8021 01-4647-8022 01-4647-7043 01-4647-7044 01-4647-7045 01-4647-7047 01-4647-7048 01-4647-9xxx COMMUNITY DEV. - MAINT.PUBLIC WORKS REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT. & OPS: City FacilitieslMaint. Dept. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EMERG & REG VEH RNTL COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILTY HAZARDOUS WASTE RMVL CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: City Facilities/MainL Dept. TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 774,540 70,000 18,350 335,800 2,950 495,980 31,580 35,030 100,550 17,250 0 6,610 15,740 15,000 712,330 41,500 2,600 95,000 18,000 7,750 35,460 0 0 0 35,000 852,700 100,000 76,000 322,340 2,950 467,500 0 219,850 84,850 18,000 0 7,530 18,650 20,000 927,030 0 2,600 97,000 18,000 0 0 5,050 0 0 33,700 882,220 100,000 76,000 322,340 2,950 467,620 0 277,300 105,500 18,000 1,290 7,530 18,650 20,000 1,054,800 1,360 2,600 97,000 18,000 38,110 43,090 67,750 13,000 0 30,000 01-4647 TOTAL: 2,867,020 3,273,750 3,665,110 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 01-4648 01-4648-1100 01-4648-1200 01-4648-1300 01-4648-1900 01-4648 -3914 01-4648-3933 01-4648-3950 01-4648-3956 01-4648-3960 01-4648-6028 01-4648-6036 01-4648-7043 01-4648-7044 01-4648-7045 01-4648 -9xxx FACILITIES MAINTENANCE REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT. AND OPERATIONS/CITY FACILITIES EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEHICLE & EQUIP. RENTAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES/CITY FACILITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 418,510 418,510 18,000 18,000 46,450 46,450 159,030 159,030 183,930 205,930 5,000 5,000 0 0 520 520 1,900 1,900 0 0 699,160 623,480 0 35,000 0 42,820 23,000 0 0 01-4648 TOTAL: 0 1,532,500 1,579,640 ?? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 01-4650 01-4650-1100 01-4650-1200 01-4650-1300 01-4650-1900 01-4650-3100 01-4650-3300 01-4650-3900 01-4650-3956 01-4650-3960 01-4650-5900 01-4650-6028 01-4650-7043 01-4650-7047 01-4650-9501 INTEGRATED WASTE MGMT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS DUES GENERAL LIABILTY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT EAST LION'S CENTER RENOVATION 244,870 10,000 0 105,290 1,100 6OO 67,400 28O 1,470 75,000 2,500 10,000 0 0 256,250 15,000 10,000 95,010 1,100 84O 47,400 280 1,270 75,000 2,500 0 0 0 265,120 15,000 10,000 95,010 1,210 84O 51,300 28O 1,270 75,000 2,500 0 0 0 01-4650 TOTAL: 518,510 504,650 517,530 01-4991-9000 TRANSFER OUT 01-4991 TOTAL: 805,130 805,130 915,200 915,200 915,200 915,200 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 02-4532 03-4451 05-4150 06-4637 07-4647 08-4647 09-4637 10-4637 12-4637 13-4563 14-4158 16-4637 t9-4637 20-4532 21-4647 20-4991 22-4637 23-4637 24-4637 SUMMARY BY FUND, BY COST CENTER LIBRARY REIMB/STATE & COUNTY PRKG CIT' SPORTS COMPLEX CCWD REIMBURSEMENTS CALTRANS REIMB. S.B.CNTY REIMB. GAS TAX 2106, 2107 & 2107.5 PROPOSITION 1~1 TDA ARTICLE 8 FUNDS COMM SRVCS-RECREATN AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT PED.GRANTIART. 3 DRAINAGE / ETIWANDA PARK DEVELOPMENT BEAUTIFICATION FUND TRANSFERS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE: GEN'L CITY F.A.U. / ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 1,304,800 1,337,120 1,309,420 8,500 16,000 16,000 1,352,830 1,359,970 1,362,520 27,570 54,900 284,900 20,850 52,040 50,540 69,320 64,610 64,610 1,556,440 1,610,560 1,661,030 1,878,250 1,525,090 1,635,320 218,160 64,000 189,180 1,294,310 1,437,040 1,185,760 205,340 178,200 178,650 84,000 89,000 4,000 25,630 20,000 95,000 492,400 630,350 1,212,000 772,550 545,440 684,480 0 0 0 2,154,380 3,149,410 2,446,250 142,320 518,550 686,050 4,444,000 6,456,000 485,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 25-4285 26-4532 28-4333 32-4637 33-4131 35-4637 4o-413o 41-4130 42-4130 43-4130 44-4130 45-4130 46-413o 47-413o 48-4130 55-4130 56-4130 57-4130 58-4130 59-4130 60-4130 DESCRIPTION CAPITAL RESERVE FUND R-Z'BERG GRANT FUND C.D.B.G. FUND MEASURE I SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN SB 140 LMD #1 GENERAL LMD #2 VICTORIA LMD #3A PRKWY SO. 6TH ST. E.OF 115 LMD ~4 TERRA VISTA LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA SLD #1 ARTERIAL SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL SLD #3 VICTORIA SLD #4 TERRA VISTA SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY SLD #6 INDUSTRIAL AREA 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 428,500 29,090 1,841,100 1,706,000 478,220 113,000 1,126,840 2,373,970 4,030 1,750,810 7,490 409,460 762,200 402,440 18,310 494,420 261,300 177,050 75,640 54,110 48,370 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1,097,470 o 1,o41,55o 2,827,820 495,230 248,000 1,25o,61o 2,400,080 3,12o 1,429,74o 3,340 376,420 948,690 354,630 15,o9o 492,830 262,81o 178,74o lO8,49o 54,480 81,460 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 51o,ooo o 779,340 5,077,360 518,860 lO8,OOO 1,3o9,7oo 2,364,220 2,980 1,433,21o 4,790 395,470 761,750 348,660 16,62o 567,21o 332,81o 220,560 125,49o 64,480 92,660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL, YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 61-4130 62-4130 64-4130 72-4225 74-4225 75-4130 76-4130 78-4130 81-4637 82-4130 83-4637 87-4130 90-4130 93-4130 94-4991 95-4637 96-4130 97-4991 109-4647 110-4637 DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA 17,460 SLD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA 4,060 AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO OF ARROW ! REDEMP. 504,760 INTER-GOV'T SERVlCES/EQPT RPLC & USAGE 135,000 INTER-GOV'T SRVCS/COMPUTER EQPT RPLC 0 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV. 0 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND: FLOOD 334,280 AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT 15,000 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: REDEMPTION 202,580 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVE 7,000 AD 82-1R 6TH ST INDUSTRIAL: IMPROY. 47,710 CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK REDEMPTION FUND 1,862,110 PD 85 RED HILL & HERITAGE: REDMPT 1,699,010 AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: REDEMPTION 1,055,500 AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL: RESERVE 625,030 AD 86-2 PJC DRAINAGE DIST.: tMPROV. 50,500 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: REDMPT 258,080 AD 86-2 R/C DRAINAGE DIST.: RESERVE FUND 82,930 METROLINK MAINT. & SECURITY PROGRAM 0 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 36,110 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 18,160 3,960 503,850 954,830 317,660 0 332,870 0 140,590 4,250 5,000 1,873,480 1,984,790 641,490 652,410 344,090 174,460 0 0 39,000 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 18,160 3,960 503,850 949,430 322,860 0 332,870 0 140,590 9,000 0 1,783,500 1,914,700 693,550 652,410 0 172,490 0 0 31,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 111-4532 113-4532 114-4451 115-4451 116-4451 117-4451 118-4532 119-4532 122-4130 125-4130 131-4130 132-4532 133-4532 134-4532 135-4532 136-4532 139-4451 140-4451 141-4451 150-4637 DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN GRANT MAJOR URBAN RESOURCE LIBRARY GRANT UNIVERSAL COPS GRANT COPS MORE GRANT LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLEF) GRA ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT GRANDPARENTS WITH BOOKS GRANT BENEFIT ASSESS. DIST. No 91-2 (Day Canyon Basin CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER SENIOR OUTREACH PROGRAM GRANT COMMUNITY SKATE PARK TEEN AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM GRANT CA STATE LIBRARY FOUNDATION GRANT LIBRARY SERVICES & TECHNOLOGIES ACT COPS UNIVERSAL GRANT '98 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 97 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 98 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD 96,970 13,000 150,000 79,540 0 269,790 3,500 5,000 32,910 426,890 25,000 0 10,080 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 89,130 13,000 125,000 0 0 258,090 3,500 0 27,790 429,720 238,680 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 89,780 13,000 125,000 0 0 426,780 3,500 0 27,790 429,720 238,680 3,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 92,320 77,500 GRAND TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS BY DEPT (INCLUDING GENERAL FUND) 68,662,340 76,025,580 72,982,420 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 02.-4532 02-4532-1100 02-4532-1200 02-4532-1300 02-4532-1900 02-4532-3100 02-4532-3300 O2-4532-3900 02-4532-3914 02-4532-3932 02-4532-3933 02-4532-3956 02-4532-3960 02-4532-6028 02-4532-6036 02-4532-7047 02 -4532-8019 02-4532-8021 02-4532-8022 02-4532 TOTAL: LIBRARY: PROGRAM SERVICES SUMMARY BY FUND, BY COST CENTER, BY ACCOUNT REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETING MILEAGE MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS: C~ty Facilities EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEHICLEIEQUlPMENT RENTAL DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: City Facilities COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 413,890 450,530 450,530 0 0 0 249,390 254,380 264,380 187,820 174,290 174,290 4,000 4,000 5,500 3,800 5,000 5,000 139,300 163,330 163,330 10,530 0 0 7,140 4,440 9,920 380 380 0 2,100 2,100 2,100 4,490 4,220 4,220 173,380 175,450 132,150 39,580 0 0 0 32,000 32,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 50,000 48,000 48,000 1,304,800 1,337,120 1,309,420 03-4451 03-4451-3900 REIMB/STATE & COUNTY RE PARKING CITATIONS PARKING CITATIONS SURCHRG 8,500 16,000 16,000 03-4451 TOTAL: 8,500 16,000 16,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 05-4150 05-4150-1100 05-4150-1200 05-4150-1300 05-4150-1900 05-4150-3100 05-4150-3300 05-4150-3911 05-4150-3913 05-4150-3914 05-4150-3931 05-4150-3932 05-4150-3933 05-4150-3942 05-4150-3956 05-4150-3960 05-4150-6027 05-4150-6028 05-4150-6031 05-4150-6033 05-4150-6036 i05-4150-8019 ~05-4150-6020 05-4150-8021 05-4150-8022 05-4150-7043 05-4150-7044 05-4150-7047 05-4150-9412 05-4150-98xx 05-4150-98xx 05-4150-98xx 05-4150-98xx 05-4150-98xx 05-4150-98xx SPORTS COMPLEX REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT. & OPERATIONS/Recreation Programs MAINT. & OPERATIONS/Complex Maint. MAINT. & OPERATIONS/Stadium Maint. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG & ROUTINE VEH & EQUIP RENTAL. ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION DUES GENERAL LIABILITY HAZARDOLJS WASTE REMOVAL CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERViCES/Recreation Programs CONTRACT SERVICES/Complex Maint. CONTRACT SERVICES/Stadium Maint. TELEPHONE UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAP PROJ:Calsense Retrofit DTR-2 CntrllSports Complex CAPITAL PROJECT: Replace pavers CAPITAL PROJFCT: Cement Under Right Field Terrace CAPITAL PROJECT: Painting Exterior Of Stadium CAPITAL PROJECT: Roof For Geotex CAPITAL PROJECT: Epoxy Coat Restroom Floors CAPITAL PROJECT: Design Restroom/Storage Bldg Lot G 225,520 33,000 195,300 123,760 0 0 82,620 31,100 39,000 8,250 0 0 0 0 7,680 0 60,000 106,920 8,210 172,500 15,660 7,350 61,460 174,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 237,520 33,000 215,000 99,530 0 0 67,520 31,100 39,800 9,020 5,500 3,000 0 7,590 0 60,000 111,830 8,210 174,000 16,000 7,350 62,000 172,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 245,740 33,000 215,000 99,530 0 0 60,470 31,100 39,800 9,020 5,500 3,000 0 0 7,590 0 55,000 109,210 8,210 174,000 22,000 7,350 62,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05-4150 TOTAL: 1,352,830 1,359,970 1,362,520 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998~99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 06-4637 06-4637-1100 06-4637-1900 06-4637-3900 06-4637-3931 06-4637-3932 06-4637-3933 06-4637-6028 06-4637-7044 06-4637-XXXX CCWD REIMBURSEMENT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MNT. & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/DEPRECIATION EMERGENCY & REGULAR VEHICLE RENTAL CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT Day Creek Blvd-Base Line to Highland-Special Funding 19,430 8,140 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,050 7,790 6,500 15,000 2,500 1,560 5OO 0 21,050 7,790 6,500 15,000 2,500 1,560 5O0 0 230,000 06-4637 TOTAL: 27,570 54,900 284,900 07-4647 07-4647-1100 07-4647-1900 07-4647-3900 07-4647-3930 07-4647-3931 07-4647-3932 07-4647-3933 07-4647-6027 07-4647-6028 07-4647-7044 07-4647-7045 07-4647-9533 CALTRANS REIMB./MNT. REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT. & OPERATIONS FUEL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EMERGENCY & REGULAR VEHICLE RENTAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES SIGNAL & ST WIDENING ~ EAST & HIGHLAND 14,580 6,270 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,360 5,680 14,500 2,500 2,500 1,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 1,500 0 0 15,360 5,680 8,470 2,500 1,000 1,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 7,530 0 0 07-4647 TOTAL: 20,850 52,040 50,540 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 08-4647 08-4647-1100 08-4647-1300 08-4647-1900 08-4647-6028 08-4647 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION S.B.CNTY REIMB/MNT. REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS CONTRACT SERVICES 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 4,960 5,270 5,270 0 0 0 2,130 1,950 1,950 62,230 57,390 57,390 69,320 64,610 64,610 09-4637 09-4637-1100 09-4637-1200 09,4637-1300 09-4637-1900 09-4637-3100 09-4637-3930 09-4637-3931 09-4637-3932 09-4637-3933 09-4637-6028 09-4637-7044 09-4637-7045 09-4637-8019 09-4637-8022 09,4637-9703 GAS TAX 2'106, 2107 & 2107.5 REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETING MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EMERGENCY & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES TELEPHONE UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES HAVEN W/S: (BASELINE TO HIGHLAND) 663,960 703,510 703,510 10,000 10,000 10,000 38,500 40,000 40,000 283,660 263,900 263,900 0 980 0 980 156,740 135,920 135,920 2,780 21,920 26,600 5,000 5,000 5,000 26,000 59,000 60,750 74,500 10,330 38,870 25,300 0 0 0 10,000 500 240,000 350,000 375,000 30,000 0 0 09,4637 TOTAL: 1,556,440 1,610,560 1,661,030 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 10-4637 10-4637-1100 10-4637 -1200 10-4637-1300 10-4637-1900 10-4637-3900 10-4637-6028 10-4637-7047 10-4637-8022 10-4637-9110 10-4637-9113 10-4637-9203 10-4637-9309 10-4637-9310 10-4637-9314 10-4637-9320 10-4637-9505 10-4637-9511 10-4637-9604 10-4637 -9605 10-4637-9606 10-4637-9607 10-4637-9704 10-4637-9705 10-4637 -9706 10-4637-9707 10-4637-9803 10-4637-9804 10-4637-9805 10-4637-9806 10-4637-9807 10-4637-9518 10-4637-9808 t0-4637-9809 10-4637 -9810 10-4637-9811 10-4637-9812 10-4637-9813 10-4637-XXXX 10-4637-XXXX 10-4637-XXXX 10-4637-XXXX 10-4637-XXXX 10-4637 TOTAL: PROPOSITION '111 REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC UTILITIES PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM LOCAL STREET REHAB. (VAR) BASELINE ~ EAST TRAFFIC SIGNAL SAPPHIRE: MOON TO HILLSIDE HIGHLAND ~ EAST TRAFFIC SIGNAL CARNELIAN ST-SAN BERNARDINO RD TO BASE L MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementatior~ JERSEY (HAVEN TO RR SPUR) ETIWANDA (6TH TO ARROW) 19th ST. REHAB. & DRAIN (JASPER/CARNELIAN) AMETHYST ST PVMT REHAB (BASEL~NE/19t.h} SAPPHIRE ST (HILLSIDE to SO.of ALMOND) PVMT PVMT REHAB: ARROW ROUTE/DEER CREEK BR. HAVEN / FOOTHILL TO WILSON (Various Locations) 4th & HERMOSA TRAFFIC SIGNAL LEMON RIGHT OF WAY 4th STREET REHAB (Santa Anita l'o Pic N Say) 4TH STREET-UTICA TO PITTSBURG PAVE REHAB ADA REQUIRED RAMPS SUMMIT AVE-EAST AVE TO EIO SCHOOL FOOTHILL BLVr)/HERMOSA AVE INTERSECTION ARROW RTE-GROVE AVE TO BAKER ST PAVE REHAB BERYL-BASE LINE RD TO 19TH ST PAVE REHAB HAVEN AVE-LEMON AVE TO WILSON AVE PAVE REHAB CHURCH ST WlO HERMOSA AVE CORRECT CROWN HELLMAN-NIO ARROW RTE CORR~ECT CROWN CARNELIAN (~ 19TH ST SIGNAL MODIFICATION AMETHYST-19TH ST TO NORHT C~TY LIMIT PAVE REHAB METROLINK CORRIDOR EEM PROGRAM 8TH STREET-VINEYARD TO ARCHIBALD 6TH STREET REHAB FROM HAVEN TO MILLIKEN 6TH STREET REHAB FROM MILLIKEN TO HYSSOP BASE LINE REHAB-VINEYARD TO HELLMAN MILLIKEN AVE. REH'AB FROM 4TH ST. TO 7TH ST. 249,500 0 O 107,290 0 265,000 0 0 2,000 500,000 30,000 225,800 5,000 0 2,500 20,000 0 147,160 62,000 25,000 12,000 2~000 3,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,878,250 175,670 0 0 65,000 3,420 277,000 3,500 2,000 175,000 0 226,000 0 0 0 20,000 0 2,500 60,000 2,500 0 5,000 2,500 220,000 10,000 50,000 50,000 10,000 7,000 7,000 10,000 7,000 5,000 15,0OO 10,000 104,000 ,525,090 175,670 0 0 65,000 3,420 292,000 3,500 0 10,000 435,310 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,010 0 2,000 2,500 220,000 10,000 80,000 200,000 0 3,540 5,00O 4,300 8,000 1,070 7,000 0 104,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,635,320 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 12-4637 12-4637-1100 12-4637-1900 12-4637-8828 12-4637-8913 12-4637-9203 12-4637-9305 12-4637-9310 12-4637-9608 12-4637-9609 12-4637-9610 12-4637-9705 12-4637 TOTAL: TDA ARTICLE 8 REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS SIG.19TH & HERMOSA SIG. ~ ARCHIBALD & S.B. SIGNAL BASELINE ~ EAST AVE SIGNAL: FOOTHILL ~ BAKER SIGNAL CHURCH {~ TERRA VISTA PRY SIGNAL INSTALLATION ~ ARROW & BAKER Traffic Controller (~ S.B.Road,Grove, Arrow Rte,9th St Traffic Sig I nterconnect, Retiming & Refitting/Var Loc 4th {~ HERMOSA TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,980 30,000 30,000 7,180 24,000 24,000 130,000 5,000 130,180 218,160 64,000 189,180 13-4563 13-4563-1100 13-4563-1300 13-4563-1900 13-4563-1900 13-4563-3100 13-4563-3300 13-4563-3900 13-4563-3914 13-4563-3932 13-4563-3956 13-4563-3960 13-4563-5900 13-4563-6028 13-4563-6036 13-4563-7043 13-4563-7044 13-4563-7047 COMM SRVCS-RECREATN REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS FRINGE BENEFITS-PT SALARIES TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: Facilities EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION DUES GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN.IGENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES: Facilities C/O: BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS C/O: EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE/FIXTURES C/O: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 119,030 152,890 104,460 404,260 545,630 448,350 87,320 56,570 56,570 0 16,370 16,370 950 0 0 1,020 1,250 1,250 192,870 218,120 188,690 12,000 0 0 6,570 2,950 7,100 650 250 250 6,730 6,500 6,500 96,530 107,610 68,560 297,260 319,600 280,360 64,700 0 0 2,000 2,000 0 1,900 0 0 520 7,300 7,300 13-4563 TOTAL: 1,294,310 1,437,040 1,185,760 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 14-4158 14-4158-1100 14-4158-1900 14-4158-3100 14-4158-3900 14-4158-3956 14-4158-3960 14-4158-6028 14-4158-7047 14-4158-9501 14-4158-XXXX 14-4158 TOTAL: AIR QUALITY IMPRMNT GRANT REGULAR SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETING MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS DUES GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY:COMPUTER EQUIPMENT EAST LIONS CENTER Design and Construct Bus Bays 19,360 8,320 100 75,000 2O0 1,760 100,600 0 0 205,340 13,000 4,810 0 92,000 2OO 1,590 66,600 0 178,200 13,450 4,810 0 92,000 2OO 1,590 66,600 0 0 0 178,650 16-4637 16-4637-9106 16-4637-9402 16-4637-9508 PED. GRANTIART3 WHEELCHAIR RAMPS (VAR.LOCA) BERYL ST IMPV(BASELINE / 19THt ALPINE/RAMONA SIDEWALKS 8,000 51,000 25,000 4,000 55,000 30,000 4,000 0 0 16-4637 TOTA L: 84,000 89,000 4,000 19-4637 19-4637-1100 19-4637-1900 19-4637-5900 19-4637-9120 19-4637-9611 DRAINAGE FAC: ETIWANDA REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS MINOR STORM DRAIN IMPROV (Var. Locations) 10,930 4,700 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 o 0 0 75,000 20,000 o 19-4637 TOTAL: 25,630 20,000 95,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL 'YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 20-4532 20-4532-1100 20-4532-1300 20-4532-1900 20-4532-3100 20-4532-3900 20-4532-3932 20-4532-3950 20-4532-3960 20-4532-6028 20-4532-7047 20-4532-8927 20-4532-9315 20-4532-9405 20-4532-9501 20-4532-9612 20-4532-9721 20-4532-9722 20-4532-9723 20-4532-9724 20-4532-9842 20-4532-9844 20-4532-XXXX 20-4532-XXXX 20-4532 TOTAL: PARK DEVELOPMENT REGULAR PAYROLL PART TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL 8, MEETING MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES COMPUTER EQUIPMENT N/E COMM PRK DB RETR WEST LION'S CENTER RENOVATION Tot Lot Rehab(ADA & Safety):Lions & Hermosa Phase 1 EAST LION'S CENTER RENOVATION Electrical System Upgrade/OIdTown/&Touch Pad Sys Eftwanda Creek Park Lights Skate Park Trailer ReVocation Central School Ball Field Drainage Building Modifications Security Lighting ~ Windrows Park &Paseo Fairmont Ave Landscaping-Kenyon To Highland Required ADA Improvements ~ Lions East 0 0 0 0 1,520 380 36,000 409,500 0 40,000 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 492,400 0 10,o00 9OO 1,000 1,100 1,780 69O 65,000 413,500 0 40,0OO 46,380 0 o 0 0 0 50,000 630,350 0 o 0 1,000 1,100 1,78o 0 690 70,000 0 413,50o 0 40,000 108,120 0 162,450 125,540 27,720 0 60,10o 200,000 0 0 1,212,000 20-4991-9000 TRANSFER OUT 20-4991 TOTAL: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 21-4647 21-4647-1100 21-4647-1200 21-4647-1900 21-4647-3100 21-4647 -3932 21-4647-5900 21-4647-6028 21-4647-7786 21-4647-8135 21-4647-8822 21-4647-8924 21-4647-8956 21-4647-9120 21-4647-9404 21-4647-9501 21-4647-9613 21-4647-9614 21-4647-9708 21-4647-9709 21-4647-9315 21-4647-9813 21-4647-9843 21-4647 TOTAL: BEAUTIFICATION FUND REGULAR PAYROLL OVERTIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIA'f'ION ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES 4TH STREET MEDIAN IMPRV ARCHIBALD PARKWAY BEAUTIFYCATION ETIWANDA COBBLESTONE N/E COMM PARK-CONCEPTUAL DESIGN BASELINE MEDIAN IMPRV. W/ET~WANDA DEVELOPERS REIMBURSEMENT 19th St. Pkwy. Beaut.(HermosatHaven) EAST LION'S CENTER RENOVATrON METROLINK STATION: BANNER INSTALLATION CENTRAL PARK SITE CLEAN LIP HAVEN MEDIAN RETROFITS HAVEN WEST SIDE (CHURCH TO BASELINE) LIONS WEST RENOVATION Metrolink Corridor EEM Program Foothill-Grove To Vineyard 19,060 0 8,200 1,000 1,290 37,500 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 10,000 5,000 95,000 250,000 328,500 0 0 772,550 21,470 0 7,940 0 53O 37,500 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 285,000 0 96,000 90,000 545,440 21,470 0 7,940 0 53O 37,50O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 291,580 204,460 116,000 0 684,480 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 22-4637 22-4637-1100 22-4637-1900 22-4637-3900 22-4637-3931 22-4637-3932 22-4637-3950 22-4637-5900 22-4637-6028 22-4637-7047 22-4637-8077 22-4637-8833 22-4637-8846 22-4637-9120 22-4637-9203 22-4637-9210 22-4637-9509 22-4637-9510 22-4637-9511 22-4637-9512 22-4637-9513 22-4637-9514 22-4637-9515 22-4637-9516 22-4637-9517 22-4637-9522 22-4637-9535 22-4637-9615 22-4637-9705 22-4637-9710 22-4637-9711 22-4637-9811 22-4637-9814 22-4637-9815 22-4637-9816 22-4637-9817 22-4637-9818 22-4637-9819 22-4637-9820 22-4637-9821 22-4637-9822 22-4637-9843 22-4637-XXXX 22-4637*XXXX 22-4637-XXXX 22-4637-XXXX 22-4637-XXXX 22-4637-XXXX 22-4637-XXXX 22-4637 TOTAL: SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES C/O: COMPUTERS EAST AVENUE (SUMMIT TO HIGHLAND) SIGNAL: FOOTHILL AND RAMONA BAKER ~ ATSF RR DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS BASELINE ~ EAST TRAFFIC SIGNAL ROCHESTER ~.. STSF RR ETIWANDA I~ ATSF RR EAST AVENUE (HIGHLAND TO VINEYARD~ ETIWANDA (~ ATSF RR TO ARROW SIGNAL: CHURCH @ MILLIKEN SIGNAL: VICTORIA PARK LANE (~ MILLIKEN SIGNAL: ARROW ~ BAKER SIGNAL: BASELINE ~ 1-15 SIGNAL: MILLIKEN ~ 4TH (W/O ONTARIO 6TH STREET ~ RR SPUR W/LUCAS RANCH ROAD ATSF RR SPUR ~} ARROW ROUTE ARROW RT WIDENING ~ ATSF RR SPUR ARCHIBALD BUS BAY & 4th ST. RIGHT TURN LANE 4th (~ Hermosa Traffic Signal DAY CREEK BLVD (Baseline to Highland) Foothill & Malchite Signal & Stree~ Improvements Signal Upgrade-Carnelian Street (i~ 19th Street Opticom Systems for RTE 30 Related Signals(yr I of 5) Auto Red Light Detection System Signat ~ Rochester and Victoria Park Lane Signal I~ Carnelian and Highland Signal ~ Rochester and Vintage Phase Conversation Archibald and Church Phase Conversation Archibald and Tryon Phase Conversation Baseline and Hermoss Phase Conversation Baseline and Beryl Foothill-Grove To Vineyard Signal and Street Widening-East Ave, {~ Victoria St. ISNS Conversion Conversion to Protected Left Turn Phase Signal-Foothill Bird. (~ Center Ave. Signal-Carnelain Street (~ La Vine Street Project Study Report-Base Linell "~5 Ramp Day Creek Blvd-Base Line to HighJand-Spe(: Fundin[] 455,410 195,830 10,460 8,190 10,110 87,800 22,680 1,000 0 15,000 50,000 5,000 332,400 19,500 0 300,000 0 7,000 0 10,000 0 5,000 5,000 0 0 2,000 522,000 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 524,790 194,170 11,740 3,930 9,310 105,000 3,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 5,000 50,000 19,470 0 300,000 0 5,000 140,000 5,000 0 40,000 0 0 0 5,000 522,000 100,000 12,000 50,000 130,000 140,000 140,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 410,000 524,790 194,170 11,740 3,930 22,880 0 105,000 0 3,600 0 0 0 0 5,000 207,800 0 0 0 0 5,000 101,950 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,740 522,000 70,010 0 12,000 0 115,300 152,560 120,990 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 64,790 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 2,154,380 3,149,410 2,446,250 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 23-4637 23-4637-1100 23-4637-1900 23-4637-3950 23-4637-5900 23-4637-6028 23-4637-8863 23-4637-9120 23-4637-9611 23-4637-9616 23-4637-9823 23-4637 TOTAL: GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE REGULAR PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS COMPUTER SOFTWARE/MAINTENANCE ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES AREA VI LEMON S.D. DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS MINOR STORM DRAIN IMPROV (Var. Locations) STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN UPDATE CARNELIAN STORM DRAIN 86,940 90,910 90,910 37,380 33,640 33,640 0 6,000 18,000 18,000 0 0 0 1,000 0 0 10,000 75,000 159,500 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 300,000 384,000 142,320 518,550 686,050 24-4637 24-4637-9314 24-4637-9615 24-4637-9703 24-4637-9824 24-4637-9825 24-4637-9826 F.A.U. / ST. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CARNELIAN ST RECONS:S.B.ROAD To BASELINE ARCHIBALD BUS BAY & 4th ST. RIGHT TURN LANE HAVEN WEST SIDE (Baseline To Highland~ FOOTHILL BLVD (Vineyard to Haven) Collision Database Analysis Carnelain Storm Drain South of Vivero 0 0 0 175,000 175,000 0 4,269,000 4,270,000 0 0 1,476,000 0 35,000 35,000 0 500,000 450,000 24-4637 TOTAL: 4,444,000 6,456,000 485,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998~99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 25-4285 CAPITAL RESE:RVE FUND 25-4285-3961 25-4285-6028 25-4285-7043 25-4991-9000 25-4285-9412 25-4285-9827 25-4285-9828 25-4285-9829 25-4285-9830 25-4285-9831 25-4285-9832 25-4285 TOTAL: GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES Building Improvements TRANSFERS OUT Calsense Retrofits Replace Pavers (Phase I) Concrete Right Field Terrace Painting Exterior Of Stadium Roof For Geotex Epoxy Coat Restroom Floors Design Restroom/Storage Bldg For Lot G 0 0 0 428,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 428,500 267,470 500,000 50,350 100,000 650 100,000 20,000 30,000 8,000 6,000 15,000 1,097,470 280,000 0 50,350 100,000 650 0 20,000 30,000 8,000 6,000 15,000 510,000 26-4532 26-4532-8768 26-4532-8924 ROBERTl Z'BERG GRANT FUND MISC. PARK IMPROVEMENTS ETIWANDA COMMUNITY PARK DESIGN/DEVEL. 29,090 0 26-4532 TOTAL: 29,090 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 28-4333 28-4333-1900 28-4333-8185 28-4333-8187 28-4333-8189 28-4333-9045 28-4333-9105 28-4333-9106 28-4333-9107 28-4333-9315 28-4333-9500 28-4333-9617 28-4333-9620 28-4333-9712 28-4333-9713 28-4333-9714 28-4333-9721 28-4333-9833 28-4333-9834 28-4333-9835 28-4333-9836 28-4333-xxxx 28-4333-xxxx C.D.B,G FUND PERSONNEL FRINGE BENEFITS GENERAL ADMIN: SALARIES & F.B FAIR HOUSING HOME IMPRV: SALARIES & F.B. GRAFFITI REMOVAL: SALARIES 8, F.B. NEIGHBORHOOD CTR: SALARIES & F.B. WHEELCHAIR RAMP: SALARIES & F.B. SIDEWALK GRINDING: SALARIES & F.B. LION'S CTR.: SALARIES & F.B. TAPIA VIA: SALARIES & F.B. RANCHERIA DRIVE: SALARIES & FB LANDSCAPE LIONS EAST & WEST: Salaries& FB RC SR.CTR LANDSCAPE I IRRIG:: Salaries & FB RC ST.CTR. EXPANSION & RENOV: Salaries & FB RC ST.CTR. EXPANSION & RENOV: MONTE VISTA:Salaries & FB TAPIA VIA SIDEWALKS: Salaries & FB DEVON STORM DRAIN: Salaries & FB DEVON STORM DRAIN: Salaries & FB DEVON STORM DRAIN: Salaries & FB RANCHERIA DRIVE: Salaries & FB METROLINK STATION MECH LIFT: Salarie~s & FB 135,190 0 69,360 19,970 0 19,880 19,880 13,810 26,580 0 0 7,240 73,090 7,24O 23,210 0 0 0 0 0 0 130,670 73,820 12,120 0 13,500 20,400 13,820 0 0 0 0 0 15,630 0 13,750 25,390 0 0 0 130,670 0 73,820 12,120 0 13,500 20,400 13,820 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,150 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 28-4333 28-4333-8185 28-4333-8187 28-4333-8189 28-4333-9045 28-4333-9105 28-4333-9106 28-4333-9107 28-4333-9114 28-4333-9213 28-4333-9214 28-4333-9215 28-4333-9315 28-4333-9317 28-4333-9413 28-4333-9500 28-4333-9501 28-4333-9502 28-4333-9503 28-4333-9617 28-4333-9618 28-4333-9619 28-4333-9620 28-4333-9621 28-4333-9721 28-4333-9712 28-4333-9713 28-4333-9714 28~4333-9715 28-4333-9716 28-4333-9717 28-4333-9835 28-4333-9833 28-4333-9836 28-4333-9837 28-4333-9838 28-4333-9839 28-4333-984O 28-4333 TOTAL: C.D.B.G FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS ADMINISTRATION FAIR HOUSING HOUSING REHAB. GRAFFITTI REMOVAL NEIGHBORHOOD CTR IMPROY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS SIDEWALK GRINDING LANDLORD TENANT MEDIATION HOMELESS OUTREACH HOUSE OF RUTH OLD TIMERS FOUNDATIION - HOME IMPROVEMENT WEST LION'S CENTER (ADA Improvements) S.O.V.A. Y.W.C.A. TAPIA VIA DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION EAST LION'S CENTER RENOVATION (ADA Improvements) FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB RANCHERIA STREET (Design Only) LIBRARY REMODEL FOR LITERACY SENIOR CITIZEN SERV-CITY COMM SERV DEPT WEST LION'S LANDSCAPING & PARKING NORTH TOWN / YMCA MONTE VISTA STREET RC SR.CTR LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION RC SR.CTR PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS RC ST.CTR.EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS (DESIGN} ASSISTANCE LEAGUE PARKING LOT RISING STARS OF EQUESTRIAN THERAPY OPARC ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY TAPIA VIA SIDE!WALKS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF UPLAND OLD TIMERS FOUNDATIION - SENIOR NUTRITION RC ST. CTR.EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS (CONSTRUCTION) RANCHERIA STREET (Construction) R.C. LIBRARY, BACK TO BASICS 4,410 12,470 241,040 7,070 35,240 1,150 4,080 10,070 6,200 7,600 8,010 579,250 7,000 7~000 226,530 50,000 3,000 6,000 10,000 0 3,000 29,350 5~000 2,760 21,810 90,990 33,070 7,550 3,000 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,841,100 5,420 10,020 182,570 7,230 0 11,570 10,830 9,740 6,000 7,360 7,750 161,180 6,780 6,780 5,000 0 2,910 5,810 0 0 2,910 0 4,840 0 0 0 28,710 0 0 0 100,000 83,520 5,000 8,000 42,520 0 0 1,041,550 10,420 10,220 182,500 7,230 0 43,810 10,830 9,740 9,890 7,360 6,470 161,180 6,780 6,800 0 0 2,910 5,810 0 0 4,070 0 4,840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 8,000 0 0 0 779,340 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 32.4637 32.4637-1100 32.4637-1200 32-4637-1900 32.4637-9027 32-4637-9109 32-4637-9113 32-4637-9314 32-4637-9402 32.4637-9508 32-4637-9518 32.4637-9520 32-4637-9530 32-4637-9604 32.4637-9606 32-4637-9607 32.4637-9615 32-4637-9622 32-4637-9703 32-4637-9707 32.4637-97'10 32-4637-9718 32.4637-9725 32.4637-9804 32-4637-9808 32.4637-9812 32-4637-9824 32-4637-9826 32-4637-9839 32.4637-9840 32.4991-9000 32-4991-XXXX 32.4991-XXXX 32.4991 -XXXX 32.4991 -XXXX 32-4991-XXXX 32.4637 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION MEASURE I REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS Haven St Improy Between Foothill & Baseline ! Arterial Traffic Control Device Inventory LOCAL STREET REHAB Carnelian St Reconst: S~B.Road To Baselir~e Beryl Sidewalks-Base Line to 19th Alpine ! Ramona Sidewalks Beryl St Improvement Between Basetine & 19th Street Hermosa St Rehab Between 4th & Foothill Almond Street Drainage Improvement (~ Henry Street 19th St Drainage Improy Between Jasper & Carnelian Saphire SL Rehab Between Moon & Almond St. Improvement: Arrow ~ Deer Creek Char'~r~el ARCHIBALD & FOURTH Transportation Studies & Facilities Invento~ HAVEN WEST SIDE (Baseline to H~ighland) 4th Street Rehab-Santa Anita to Piic N Say DAY CREEK BLVD (Baseline to Highland) ARROW - MILLIKEN (to the East) Signal Installation: Arrow Rte (~ Red Oak ADA Required Ramps Haven Ave-Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave Pav Rehab Amethyst-19th St to North City Limit Pav Rehab Foothill Blvd Median-Vineyard To Haven Carnelian Street and Storm Drain ~ Vivero Haven w/s Foothil~ to Deer Creek Pavement Rehab Haven els Foothill to Baseline Pavement Rehab TRANSFERS IN/OUT Pavement Management System Inventory Vineyard Ave Bus Bays-9th To Foothill 6th Street Rehab from Archibald To Hermosa Arrow Rte. Street Improvement ~ Hellman Day Creek Blvd-Base Line to Hightand~Arterial 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 0 o 0 0 0 0 10,000 17,000 5,000 o 0 15,0oo 112,000 20,000 475,000 1,012,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 1,706,000 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 54,250 20,070 0 0 400,000 0 12,000 20,000 0 0 0 2,500 112,000 0 505,000 1,012,000 0 0 50,000 180,000 460,000 2,827,820 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 54,250 0 20,070 0 0 400,000 19,380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 287,000 0 505,000 152,350 1,112,000 3,440 119,380 100,000 0 8,840 0 70,000 92,930 238,970 0 150,000 0 0 0 1,743,750 5,077,360 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 33-4131 33-4131-1100 33-4131-1300 33-4131-1900 33-4131-3100 33-4131-3300 33-4131-3900 33-4131-3932 33-4131-3960 33-4131-5900 33-4131-6028 33-4131-7047 SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETINGS MILEAGE MAINT & OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXP - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 216,600 0 92,740 2,750 300 55,100 0 1,450 62,610 24,670 22,000 231,630 3,900 85,070 3,000 3OO 59,790 1,500 1,530 67,080 22,670 18,760 231,630 0 85,070 3,000 300 58,730 9,240 1,530 67,080 39,520 22,760 33-4131 TOTAL: 478,220 495,230 518,860 35-4637 35-4637-9027 35-4637-9510 35-4637-9517 35-4637-9520 35-4637-9521 35-4637-9522 35-4637-9709 35-4637-9710 35-4637-9803 35-4637-9839 35-4637-9840 SB 140 FUND HAVEN: FOOTHILL TO BASELINE EAST AVE (HIGHLAND AVE/VICTORIA) 6th St ~ RR Spur Widening HERMOSA (4TH TO FOOTHILL) HAVEN (BASELINE TO WILSON) HAVEN (BASELINE TO WILSON) Haven-West Side L/S from Church to Baselir~e DAY CREEK BL,VD (Baseline to Highland) 4th St-Utica to Pittsburg Pavement Rehab Haven West Side Foothill to Deer Creek Rehab Haven East Side Foothill to Baseline Rehab 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 108,000 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 25,000 108,000 35,000 10,000 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108,000 0 0 0 35-4637 TOTAL: 113,000 248,000 108,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998~99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 40-4130 40-4130-1100 40-4130-1200 40-4130-1300 40-4130-1900 40-4130-1001 40-4130-3900 40-4130-3914 40-4130-3931 40-4130-3932 40-4130-3933 40-4130-3960 40-4130-5900 40-4130-6028 40-4130-6029 40-4130-6036 40-4130-7043 40-4130-7044 40-4130-7045 40-4130-7047 40-4130-7048 40-4130-8019 40-4130-8021 40-4130-8022 40-4130-9217 40-4130-9320 40-4130-9335 40-4130-9405 40-4130-9412 40-4130-9525 40-4130-9526 40-4130-9601 40-4130-9623 40-4130-9719 40-4130-97xx 40-4130-xxxx 40-4130-xxxx LMD #1 GENERAL REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: City Facilities VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG. & REG~ VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINTILNDSCP AD CONTRACT SERVICES; City Facilities CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTI LIT~ES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATER~AL REPLACEMENT MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementation PARKWAY TREE REPLACEMENT ADA TOT LOT RETROFIT: Bear Gulch Park: Calsense Retrofits: (96/97 Gonzales 6K, KGentry 169K) Concrete Fence Rplc Haven Median Lighting Repair Infield Irrigation Upgrades Rebuild Softball Field Arc At Old Town Upgrade Brittany Trail Concrete Fence Rplc(Trails:Summit;Hillsidel&2tHermosa Esra Sweeper Debris Transfer Site Relamp 36,710 46,320 46,320 1,400 1,400 1,400 3,600 3,600 3,600 16,080 17,210 17,210 48,880 50,380 50,380 49,820 45,340 42,320 14,000 14,620 14,620 19,930 28,050 30,590 7,340 6,970 6,970 250 250 250 8,650 9,830 9,830 69,390 73,790 73,790 447.370 517,660 517,660 16,000 41,500 41,500 8,000 9,000 9,000 12.880 1,350 4,350 1,560 6,340 8,420 0 0 0 7,500 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 2,500 140,000 143,000 143,000 42,000 50,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 3,000 2,000 2,000 60,000 110,000 110,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 43,190 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,000 0 3,300 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 40-4130 TOTAL: 1,126,840 1,250,610 1,309,700 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 41-4130 414130-1100 414130-1200 414130-1300 41-4130-1900 41-4130-1001 41-4130-3900 414130-3914 41-4130-3931 414130-3932 414130-3933 414130-3960 41-4130-5900 41-4130-6028 41-4130-6029 41-4130-6036 41-4130-7043 41-4130-7044 414130-7045 41-4130-7047 41-4130-8019 41-4130-8021 414130-8022 41-4130-9000 414130-9217 41-4130-9320 414130-9335 414130-9405 414130-9412 414130-9601 41-4130-xxxx 414130 TOTAL: LMD#2 VICTORIA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: City Facilities VEHICLE MAINT & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CONTRACT SERVICES: City Facilities CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY; VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES TRANSFERS OUT LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementation PARKWAY TREE REPLACEMENT ADA RETROFIT: Windrows, Kenyon, Groves & Vintage Parks CALSENSE RETROFITS Infield Irrigation Upgrades: Windrows Park Sweeper Debris Transfer Site 533,920 1,000 11,120 230,480 20,680 66,650 12,000 14,160 8,990 1,200 12,940 132,770 701,800 19,500 11,000 22,700 1,560 0 0 1,500 280,000 24,000 50,000 0 6,000 200,000 10,000 0 0 2,373,970 576,020 1,000 11,120 214,130 21,900 68,150 12,620 31,990 29,060 1,200 13,170 135,240 673,000 19,500 11,000 0 11,680 0 0 1,500 285,600 26,000 50,000 0 1,200 195,000 10,000 0 0 2,400,080 576,020 1,000 11,120 214,130 21,900 66,150 12,620 37,030 29,350 1,200 13,170 135,240 673,000 19,500 11,000 5,200 12,380 0 0 1,700 286,000 30,000 3,000 5,000 0 1,200 195,000 2,310 0 0 2,364,220 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 42-4130 42-4130-1001 42-4130-3900 42-4130-3960 42-4130-5900 42-4130-6028 42-4130-8021 42-4130-8022 42-4130-9217 LMD #3A PRKWY SO OF 6TH ST. EAST OF 1~15 ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL F~EPLACEMENT 40 350 40 260 2,400 60O 140 2O0 40 370 3O 240 1,500 600 140 200 40 370 30 240 1,500 600 200 0 42-4130 TOTAL: 4,030 3,120 2,980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 43-4130 43-4130-1100 43-4130-1200 43-4130-1300 43-4130-1900 43-4130-1001 43-4130-3900 43-4130-3914 43-4130-3931 43-4130-3932 43-4130-3933 43-4130-3960 43-4130-5900 43-4130-6028 43-4130-6029 43-4130-6O36 43-4130-7043 43-4130-7044 43-4130-7045 43-4130-7047 43-4130-8019 43-4130-8021 43 -4130-8022 43-4130-8956 43-4130-9000 43-4130-9217 43-4130-9320 43-4130-9405 43-4130-9412 43-4130-9601 43 -4130-9624 43-4130 -xxxx 43-4130-xxxx DESCRIPTION LMD ~1 TERRA VISTA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS: Regular MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS: Facilities VEHICLE MAINT & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG. & REG. VEHClLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES: Regular CONTRACT SERVICES: Tree Maint I Landscape AD CONTRACT SERVICES: Facilities CAPITAL OUTLAY: Building Improvemenl~s CAPITAL OUTLAY: Equipment CAPITAL OUTLAY: Vehicles CAPITAL OUTLAY: Computer Eq[lipment TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES TERRA VISTA/BSLN RECNST HAVEN MED & RPLC PLANT TRANSFERS OUT LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT MANDATORY ADA STUDY/IMPLEMENTATION ADA RETROFIT: Milliken & Coyote Canyon Park Tot Lots Calsense Retrofits Infield Irrigation Upgrades: Coyote & Spruce Rip Rap Slopes Sweeper Debris Transfer Site Cleanup Relamp 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 312,070 347,560 347,560 1,000 1,000 1,000 10,640 10,640 10,640 135,040 129,560 129,560 12,200 12,970 12,970 56,750 54,400 54,400 12,000 10,620 10,620 40,270 71,970 80,160 13,600 30,590 30,590 1,200 1,000 1,000 6,300 6,830 6,830 83,220 82,290 82,290 244,950 247,970 260,710 12,000 12,300 12,300 11,500 11,500 11,500 5,950 0 5,200 1,320 6,340 7,720 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,800 2,800 2,800 120,000 122,400 122,000 20,000 22,000 22,000 374,000 0 0 1,500 20,000 20,000 21,250 0 0 210,000 181,000 181,000 10,000 10,000 8,500 0 0 0 34,000 34,000 9,110 0 0 0 0 43-4130 TOTAL: 1,750,810 1,429,740 1,433,210 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 44-4130 44-4130-1001 44-4130-3900 44-4130-3931 44-4130-3960 44-4130-5900 44-4130-6028 44-4130-8019 44-4130-8021 44-4130-8022 44~4130-9217 44-4130-9405 LMD #5 NE CORNER 24TH & HERMOSA ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT & OPER GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT ADA RETROFIT TOT LOT 240 40O 70 30 390 1,410 0 300 150 0 4,500 240 430 70 30 420 1,650 0 3OO 2OO 0 0 240 430 7O 3O 420 1,650 0 5OO 250 0 1,200 44-4130 TOTAL: 7,490 3,340 4,790 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 45-4130 45-4130-1100 45-4130-1300 45 -4130-1900 45-4130-1001 45-4130-3900 45-4130-3931 45-4130-3932 45-4130-3933 45-4130-3960 45-4130-5900 45-4130-6028 45-4130-6029 45-4130-7043 45 -4130-7044 45-4130-7045 45-4130-8019 45-4130-8021 45-4130-8022 45-4130 -9217 45-4130-9335 45-4130-9411 45-4130-9412 45-4130-9625 45-4130-9626 45-4130-XXXX LMD #6 CARYN COMMUNITY REGULAR SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEF:ITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG. & REG~ VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT/LNDSCP AD CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTL.AY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE & PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT PARKWAY TRE. E REPLACEMENT TREE REPLANTINGS CALSENSE RETROFIT MT.BALDWIN CT. PLAYGROUND BLOCK WALL MT.BALDWIN CT PLAYGROUND LIGHTING SWEEPER DEBRIS TRANSFER SITE CLEANLJP 13,180 52O 5,710 6,340 8,100 3,360 800 0 3~440 23,750 191,110 31,900 750 0 0 75,000 3,500 20,000 0 12,000 10,000 0 0 0 17,760 520 6,580 6,740 10,220 4,660 1,230 0 3,210 23,160 171,000 22,900 0 84O 0 76,500 4,100 10,000 12,000 5,000 0 0 0 17,760 520 6,580 6,740 10,220 4,660 1,230 0 3,210 23,160 171,000 22,900 0 84O 0 0 76,000 4,500 29,150 12,000 0 5,000 0 0 0 45-4130 TOTAL: 409,460 376,420 395,470 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 46-4130 46 -4130-1100 46-4130-1200 46-4130-1300 46-4130-1900 46-4130-1001 46-4130-3100 46-4130-3900 46-4130-3914 46-4130-3931 46-4130 -3932 46-4130-3933 46-4130-3956 46-4130-3960 46-4130-5900 46-4130-6027 46-4130-6028 46-4130-6029 46-4130-6036 46-4130-7043 46-4130-7044 46-4130-7045 46-4130-7047 46 -4130 -8019 46-4130-8021 46-4130-8022 46-4130-9217 46-4130-9412 46-4130-9627 46-4130-xxxx 46 -4130-xx xx 46-4130 TOTAL: LMD #3B GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN TRAVEL & MEETING MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS FACILITIES VEHICLE DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINtGENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-VNDLSM/IRRG CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINTILNDSCP AD CONTRACT SERVICES: Facilities CAPITAL EXPENDITURES-BLDG ~MPROV CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUiPMEN'[' TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT CALSENSE RETROFITS Calsense Retrofits DTR-2 Central/Sports Complex Sweeper Debris Transfer Site Cleanup Resod Soccer Fields at Sports Complex 110,920 2,500 9,550 48,460 2,800 400 39,600 0 1,340 10,000 1,800 80 4,270 45~830 350 210,770 31,500 30,000 95,380 27,500 0 0 2,500 40,000 10,000 26,000 10,650 0 0 762,200 114,660 2,500 9,550 43,280 2,940 0 36,750 620 1,340 20,510 1,000 0 5,050 47,050 700 203,570 32,300 30,000 212,320 6,250 0 0 2,500 40,800 85,000 40,000 10,000 0 0 948,690 114,660 2,500 9,550 43,280 2,940 0 36,750 620 1,340 25,960 1,000 0 5,050 47,050 700 208,570 32,300 30,000 17,320 8,330 0 2,600 3,200 40,000 85,000 40,720 2,310 0 0 0 761,750 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 47-4130 47-4130-1100 47-4130-1200 47-4130-1300 47 -4130-1900 47-4130-1001 47-4130-3900 47-4130-3914 47-4130-3931 47-4130-3932 47-4130-3933 47-4130-3960 47-4130-5900 47-4130-6028 47-4130-6029 47-4130-6036 47-4130-7043 47-4130-7044 47-4130-7045 47-4130-8019 47-4130-8021 47-4130-8022 47-4130-9217 47-4130-9335 47-4130-9411 47-4130-9412 47-4130-9528 47-4130-9720 47-4130-XXXX 47-4130-XXXX LMD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN. MAINT & OPERATIONS MAINT & OPERATIONS: Facilitie.~ VEHICLE MAINT & OPER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG. & REG. VEHICLE RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES; Tree Maint./Landscape A~D. CONTRACT SERVICES: Facilities CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY; EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY; VEHICLES TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL FiEPLACEMENT TREE REPLACEMENT TREE REPLANTINGS CALSENSE CONNECTIONS TO CENTRAL ETIWANDA CREEK PARK: Tot Lot Surfacir~l ETIWANDA CREEK PARK: Soil/Sod Renovation Eftwanda Creek Tot Lot Surfacing Relamp 23,430 500 2,560 10,270 5,350 24,500 1,900 2,450 5OO 250 2,380 24,480 111,840 21,550 3,400 48O 0 2,000 36,000 3,600 10,000 0 3,000 10,000 27,000 75,000 33,890 500 2,600 12,590 5,780 24,510 4,620 2,450 5OO 25O 2,600 24,350 126,760 5,000 7,000 730 0 2,000 37,000 20,000 10,000 2,000 2,500 27,000 0 33,890 500 2,600 12,590 5,780 26,010 4,620 2,450 50O 25O 2,600 24,350 126,760 5,000 7,000 0 93O 0 3,000 37,000 20,000 11,650 2,000 0 2,500 0 16,680 0 0 47-4130 TOTAL: 402,440 354,630 348,660 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 48-4130 48-4130-1001 48-4130-3900 48-4130-3931 48-4130-3960 48-4130 -5900 48-4130-6028 48-4130-6029 48-4130-8019 48-4130-8021 48-4130-8022 48-4130-9217 48-4130-9335 48 -4130~9412 LMD #8 SOUTH ETIWANDA ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS VEHICLE MAINT/OPER GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT TREE MAINT. / LANDSCAPE TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENT TREE REPLACEMENT CALSENSE RETROFITS 580 1,120 980 140 1.270 7.420 0 500 1,500 300 2,000 2,500 0 58O 400 98O 120 1,240 6,070 0 5OO 2,100 300 2,000 8OO 0 58O 400 1,510 120 1,240 6,070 0 50O 3,000 400 2,000 80O 0 48-4130 TOTAL: 55-4130 55-4130-1001 55-4130-3900 55-4130-3932 55-4130-3933 55-4130-3960 55-4130-5900 55-4130-6028 55-4130-7044 55-4130-8022 SLD #1 ARTERIAL ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINTJOPERAT)ONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEH & EQUIP RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONT. SRV-REG. MAINT CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC UTILITIES 18,310 90,050 22,200 920 1,500 4,900 34,850 80,000 260,000 15,090 94,550 15,000 920 1,500 4,880 35,980 80,000 260,000 16,620 94,550 15,500 920 1,500 4,880 35,980 93,880 0 320,000 55-4130 TOTAL: 494,420 492,830 567,210 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 56-4130 56-4130-1001 56-4130-3960 56-4130-5900 56-4130-8022 SLD #2 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC: UTILITIES 29,380 2,590 19,330 210,000 30,790 2,600 19,420 210,000 30,790 2,600 19,420 280,000 56-4130 TOTAL: 261,300 262,810 332,810 57-4130 57-4130-1001 57-4130-3900 57-4130-3960 57-4130-5900 57-4130-8022 SLD #3 VICTORIA ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC: UTILITIES 20,500 10,000 1,750 14,800 130,000 21,730 10,000 1,770 15,240 130,000 21,730 16,820 1,770 15,240 165,000 57-4130 TOTAL: 177,050 178,740 220,560 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 58-4130 58-4130-1001 58-4130-1100 58-4130-1300 58-4130-1900 58-4130-3900 58-4130-3932 58-4130-3933 58-4130-3960 58-4130-5900 58-4130-6028 58-4130-7044 58-4130-7045 58-4130-8022 58-4130-9310 SLD #4 TERRA VISTA ASSESSMENT ADMIN REGULAR SALARIES PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINT/OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/DEPRECIATION EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEH & EQUIP RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONT SRV-REG MAINT CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLE ELECTRIC UTILITIES SIGNAL (~ TERRA VISTA & CHURCH 12,220 0 0 10,000 75O 7,670 0 0 0 45,000 0 12,960 20,000 1,800 10,000 760 7,970 0 10,000 0 45,000 0 12,960 0 0 1,800 10,000 0 0 760 7,970 20,000 10,000 0 62~000 0 58-4130 TOTAL: 75,640 108,490 125~490 59-4130 59-4130-1100 59-4130-1200 59-4130-1900 59-4130-1001 59-4t30-3900 59-4130-3932 59-4130-3933 59-4130-3960 59-4130-5900 59-4130-8022 SLD #5 CARYN COMMUNITY REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT.IOPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEH & EQUIP RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITIES 0 0 0 6,340 12,780 630 500 540 3,320 30,000 0 0 0 6,750 12,780 63O 50O 540 3,280 30,0OO 0 0 0 6,750 12~780 63O 5OO 540 3,280 40,0OO 59-4130 TOTAL: 54,110 54,480 64,480 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 60-4130 60-4130-1100 60-4130-1200 60-4130-1900 60-4130-1001 60-4130-3900 60-4130-3932 60-4130-3933 60-4130-3960 60-4130-5900 60-4130-6028 60-4130-7044 60-4130-8022 60-4130 TOTAL: SLD ~6 INDUSTRIAL AREA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY & ROUTINE VEH & EQUIP RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC UTILITIES 0 0 0 2,390 2,550 3OO 5OO 480 6,150 0 0 36,000 48,370 0 0 0 2,550 5,000 30O 5O0 710 6,400 20,000 10,000 36,000 81,460 0 0 0 2,550 6,200 3O0 5OO 710 6,400 20,000 10,000 46,000 92~660 61-4130 61-4130-1100 61-4130-1200 61-4130-1900 61-4130-1001 61-4130-3900 61-4130-3932 61-4130-3960 61-4130-5900 61-4130-6028 61-4130-8022 61-4130 TOTAL: SLD #7 NORTH ETIWANDA REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 0 0 0 3,350 200 140 170 1,600 0 12,000 17,460 0 0 0 3,790 200 140 180 1,850 0 12,000 18,160 0 0 0 3,790 200 140 180 1,850 0 12,000 18,160 62-4130 62-4130-1001 62-4130-3900 62-4130-3960 62-4130-5900 62-4130~022 SLD ft8 SOUTH ETIWANDA ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITIES 200 130 40 690 3,000 190 130 40 600 3,000 190 130 40 600 3,000 62-4130 TOTAL: 4,060 3,960 3,960 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 64-4130 64-4130-1001 64-4130-3960 64-4130-5900 64-4130-6028 64-4130-7920 64-4130 TOTAL: AD 89-1 MILLIKEN SO. OF ARROW REDEMPTION FUND ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN./GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 100 5,000 10,160 1,000 488,500 504,760 100 4,990 9,760 1,000 488,000 503,850 100 4,990 9,760 1,000 488,000 503,850 67-4532 67-4532-7920 NORTHEAST COMM PARK REDEMPTION PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 67-4532 TOTAL: 72-4225 72-4225-3942 72-4225-6028 72-4225-7044 72-4225-7045 INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT & USAGE ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES 0 0 135,000 77,830 877,000 0 0 72,430 877,000 72-4225 TOTAL: 135,000 954,830 949,430 72-4637 72-4637-7045 INTER-GOV'T SERVICES CAP.EXP./RPLC VEH EQ 72-4637 TOTAL: 73-4265 73-4265-1100 73-4265-2050 BENEFITSCONTINGENT REGULAR PAYROLL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 73-4265 TOTAL: /// CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER 74~1225 74-4225-7047 74-4225 TOTAL: DESCRIPTION INTER-GOV'T SERVICES: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT & USAGE CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 317,660 317,660 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 322,860 322,860 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 75.4130 75-4130-6028 CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROV. CONTRACT SERVICES 75-4130 TOTAL: 76.4130 76.4130-1001 76.4130-3960 76.44130-5900 76.4130-6028 76-4130-7920 76-4130-xxxx CFD 88-2 ETIWANDA/HIGHLAND IMPROVe(Flood) ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE TRANSFERS OUT: '96-97 1 97-98 Transfer to Fund 78 2,400 3,310 44,430 1,000 282,900 240 2,600 3,300 42,450 1,000 283,000 520 2,600 3,300 42,450 1,000 283,000 520 76-4130 TOTAL: 334,280 332,870 332,870 78-4130 78-4130-6028 78-4130-xxxx AD 88-2 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT SERVICES TRANSFERS OUT: To Fund 01 0 15,000 78.4130 TOTAL: 15,000 81.4637 81-4637-1001 81-4637-3960 81.4637-5900 81.4637-7920 AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL IMPROV./REDEMP. ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 1,500 2,010 4,070 195,000 1,500 1,390 2,700 135,000 1,500 1,390 2,700 135,000 81-4637 TOTAL: 202,580 140,590 140,590 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 82-4130 82-xxxx-9000 82-4130 TOTAL: AD 84-2 ALTA LOMA CHANNEL: RESERVES TRANSFER OUT: '96-97 / 97-98Transfer to F[~,nd 81 7,000 7,000 4,250 4,250 9,000 9,000 83-4637 83-4637-6028 83-4637 TOTAL: AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL IMPROV. CONTRACT SERVICES 47,710 47,710 5,000 5,000 87-4130 87-4130-1001 87-4130-3960 87-4130-5900 87-4130-6028 87-4130-7920 87-4130 TOTAL: CFD 84-1 DAY CREEK / REDEMPTION FUND ASSESSMENT ADMIN. GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 18,550 18,440 78,570 1,000 1,745,550 1,862,110 19,550 18,550 87,260 3,000 1,745,120 1,873,480 19,550 18,550 87,260 1,000 1,657,140 1,783,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 90-4130 90-4130-1100 90-4130-1200 90-4130-1300 90-4130-1900 90-4130-1001 90-4130-3900 90-4130-3914 90-4130-3931 90-4130-3932 90-4130-3933 90-4130-3960 90-4130-3981 90-4130-5900 90-4130-6028 90-4130-6029 90-4130-6036 90-4130-7043 90-4130-7044 90-4130-7045 90-4130-7047 90-4130-7920 90-4130-8019 90-4130-8021 90-4130-8022 90-4130-9000 90-4130-8541 90-4130-9217 90-4130-9221 90-4130-9222 90-4130-9320 90-4130-9405 90-4130-9628 90-4130-9629 90-4130-9841 90-4130-XXXX 90-4130-XXXX 90-4130-XXXX 90-4130-XXXX PD 85 RED HILL & HERITAGE / REDEMPTION REGULAR SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES PARTTIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT./OPERATIONS MAINT.IOPERATIONS: City Facilities VEHICLE DEPRECIATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMERG.& ROUTINE VEHJEQUIP~RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY DELINQUENCY CONTINGENCY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT SERVICES: City Facilities CAPITAL OUTLAY: BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLES CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE TELEPHONE UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILmES TRANSFERS OUT Heritage Trail Realignment TREE, SHRUB & GROUND COVER REPLACEMENT RESURFACE EQUEST. RINI~JHERITG INSTALL COMP.TOUCH PAD SYS. MANDATORY ADA STUDY/Implementation TOT LOT REHABILITATION/ADA Retrofit Redhill & Heritage HERITAGE & RED HILL LANDSCAPE REHAB EQUESTRIAN RAMP WOOD SHAVINGS FOR EQUESTIAN ARENA Calsense Upgrades-Red Hill Equipment Storage Cover Rehab Lake Filtration System Storage Facility at Red Hill Park for Corem Service 245,460 277,560 277,560 0 0 7,600 7,600 7,600 106,160 102,850 102,850 134,450 135,910 135,910 80,000 80,900 80,900 20,000 18,000 18,000 24,000 37,310 37,310 5,140 22,560 22,560 2,000 2,000 2,000 13,220 13,430 13,430 0 0 0 135,480 131,170 131,170 24,500 11,900 11,900 0 4,000 4,000 15,000 27,000 27,000 5,000 11,000 0 0 64,600 64,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 681,000 670,000 666,270 3,000 3,000 4,000 100,000 102,400 103,000 97,000 97,000 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,600 97,300 0 0 2,270 0 0 0 0 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 90-4130 TOTAL: 1,699,010 1,984,790 1,914,700 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 93-4130 93-4130-1001 93-4130-3900 93-4130-3960 93-4130-5900 93-4130-6028 93-4130-7920 93-4130-9803 93-4130 TOTAL: AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL/REDEMPTION ASSESSMENT ADMIN MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE 4th ST-Utica to Pittsburgh Pavement Rehab 0 0 0 0 0 1,055,500 1,055,500 0 0 6,350 0 635,140 0 641,490 0 0 6,350 0 11,350 0 675,850 693,550 94-4130 94-4130-3960 94-4130-5900 94-4130-7920 94-4991-9000 94-4130 TOTAL: AD 82-1R 6TH ST. INDUSTRIAL ! RESERVES GENERALLIABILITY ADMIN/GENERALOVERHEAD PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE TRANSFERS OUT 0 0 625,030 0 625,030 5,510 0 550,540 96,360 652,410 5,510 0 550,540 96,360 652,410 95-4637 95-4637-3960 95-4637-6028 AD 86-2 P. JC DRAINAGE DISTRICT IMPROV. GENERAL LIABILITY CONT SRV-REG MAINT 5OO 50,000 3,410 340,680 95-4637 TOTAL: 50,500 344,090 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 96-4130 96-4130-1001 96-4130-3960 96-4130-5900 96-4130-6028 96-4130-7920 96-4130 TOTAL: 97-4130 97-4130-3900 97-4130-3960 97-4130-5900 97-4130-7920 AD 86-2 PJC DRAINAGE DISTRICT'IREDEMP ASSESSMENT ADMIN GENERAL LIABILITY ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE AD 86-2 RIC DRAINAGE DISTRICTSRESERVES MAINT & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD PAYMENTS TO TRUSTEE 6,060 2,560 5,260 1,000 243,200 258,080 500 82O 1,610 80,000 6,220 1,730 3,210 3,000 160,300 174,460 6,220 1,730 3,210 1,000 160,330 172,490 97-4130 TOTAL: 82,930 109-4647 109-4647-3900 109-4647-3933 109-4647-3960 109-4647-6028 109-4647-8021 109-4647-8022 METROLINK MAINT. & SECURITY PROGRAM MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS EMERG.& ROUTINE VEH.IEQUIP.RENTAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES WATER UTILITIES ELECTRIC UTILITIES 109-4647 TOTAL: //7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 110-4637 110-4637-1200 110-4637-3900 110-4637-6028 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT OVERTIME MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES 6,460 19,850 9,800 10,000 26,000 3,000 10,000 18,000 3,000 110-4637 TOTAL: 36,110 39,000 31,000 111-4532 111-4532-1100 111-4532-1300 111-4532-1900 111-4532-3100 111-4532-3300 111-4532-3900 i111-4532-5910 111-4532-6028 111-4532-7044 111-4532-8019 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN GRAN"[ REGULAR SALARIES PART-TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL & MEETING MILEAGE MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS LIBRARY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL EXPENDITURES-EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE UTILITIES 24,020 10,330 8OO 40O 4,850 7,670 48,500 0 40O 25,130 9,300 80O 670 2,500 4,000 46,730 0 25,780 0 9,300 800 670 2,500 4,000 46,730 0 0 111-4432 TOTAL: 96,970 89,130 89,780 113-4532 MAJOR URBAN RESOURCE LIBRARY GRANT 113-4532-3900 MAINTENEANCE & OPERATIONS 13,000 13,000 13,000 113-4532 TOTAL: I 13,000 13,000 13,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 114-4451 UNIVERSAL COPS GRANT 114-4451-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 114-4451 TOTAL: 150,000 150,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 115-4451 COPS MORE GRANT 115-4451-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 79,540 115-4451 TOTAL: 79,540 116-4451 116-4451-3900 116-4451-6028 116-4451-7044 116-4451-7047 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUlPMEN'~ 116-4451 TOTAL: 117-4451 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLEF) GRANT 117-4451-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 269,790 258,090 426,780 117..4451 TOTAL: I 269,790 258,090 426,780 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 ADOPTED ADOPTED AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 118-4532 ADULT EDUCATION ACT GRANT 118-4532-3900 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 118-4532-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0 118-4532 TOTAL: 3,500 3,500 3,500 119-4532 GRANDPARENTS WITH BOOKS GRANT 119-4532-3900 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 5,000 0 0 119-4532 TOTAL: 5,000 0 0 122-4130 BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICI" NO. 91 ~2: Day Canyon Basin 122-4130-1100 REGULAR SALARIES 122-4130-1900 FRINGE BENEFITS 122-4130-1001 ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION 122-4130-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 122-4130-5900 ADMINISTRATION / GENERAL OVERHEAD 122-4130-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,260 1,260 1,260 32O 28O 28O 1,530 1,250 1,250 29,800 25,000 25,000 122-4130 TOTAL: 32,910 27,790 27,790 125-4130 CFD 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 125-4130-1001 ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION 125-4130-3960 GENERAL LIABILITY 125-4130-5900 ADMINIGENERAL OVERHEAD 125-4130-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 125-4130-7920 PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE 70 60 60 4,230 4,250 4,250 30,880 30,930 30,930 1,000 3,000 3,000 390,710 391,480 391,480 125-4130 TOTAL: I 426,890 429,720 429,720 126 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL 'YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 131-4130 131-4130-1001 131-4130-3960 131-4130-5900 131-4130-6028 131-4130-7920 131-4130 TOTAL: AD 93-1 MASI COMMERCE CENTER ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION GENERAL LIABILITY ADMIN/GENERAL OVERHEAD CONTRACT SERVICES PAYMENT TO TRUSTEE 0 0 0 25,000 0 25,000 140 0 0 0 238,540 238,680 140 0 0 0 238,540 238,680 132-4532 132-4532-1300 132-4532-1900 132-4532-3900 132-4532-3960 132-4532-6028 SENIOR OUTREACH PROGRAM GRANT PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 1,000 20 1,000 20 960 132-4532 TOTAL: 3,000 133-4532 COMMUNITY SKATE PARK 133-4532-1300 133-4532-1900 133-4532-3900 133-4532-3960 133-4532-6028 PART-TIME PAYROLL FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES 133-4532 TOTAL: 55O 4O 6,400 9O 3,000 10,080 134-4532 TEEN AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM GRANT 134-4532-1300 134-4532-1900 134-4532-3900 134-4532-3960 134-4532-6028 134-4532-7044 134-4532-7047 PART TIME SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GENERAL LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY: EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 134-4532 TOTAL: I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 135-4532 135-4532-3100 135-4532-3900 135-4532-6028 CA STATE LIBRARY FOUNDATION GRAN'I' TRAVEL & MEETING MAINTENANCE: & OPERATIONS CONTRACT SERVICES 135-4532 TOTAL: 136-4532 136-4532-1300 136-4532-3100 136-4532-3900 136-4532-7047 LIBRARY SERVICES & TECHNOLOGIES ACT PART-TIME PAYROLL TRAVEL & MEETINGS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY: COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1997-98 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 ADOPTED BUDGET 1998-99 AMENDED BUDGET 136-4532 TOTAL: 139-4451 139-4451-6028 COPS UNIVERSAL GRANT '98 CONTRACT SERVICES 150,000 150,000 139-4451 TOTAL: 150,000 150,000 140-4451 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT' '97 140-4451-7045 CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLE 140-4451 TOTAL: 141-4451 141-4451-3900 141-4451-7045 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCI~ GRANT '98 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY: VEHICLE 9,380 82,940 141-4451 TOTAL: 92,320 150-4637 SOUTH ETIWANDA AD 150-4637-6028 CONTRACT SERVICES 77,500 150-4637 TOTAL: 77,500 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: C'ITY OF RAN(H ,.) CUCAMC NGA STAFiF REPORT April 21, 1999 Mayor, Members of the (ii~:5.' Council and Jack Lain, AICP. City Mm:mger William J~ O'Neil. (:it5,' I::5'~ginee:r Dawn }taddon. Jr. Buyer A[J"I'H()RIZATION T() Pl RCHASI:: ONE (1) I ~(). EXTENDEI) CAB UTILITY I!I()DY 'FRIi(:'K WITH UTILITY TRAILER FROM FAIRVI[:..W FORD Oh' S.AN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS THE LOWES'I:' P, ESP()NSI\/15:: AN[:) RESPONSIBLE BIDDER IN THE AMOIJN'15' { )1:-: $::;i';,616,40 FUNDED FROM IN TERC; OV t!~;P,N M [~;b,'I'~A I. S }!!.R V1CtES A(2CO[ JNT N(). 72-4225 -7045. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City (.'ouncil authorize the purchase of one (1) Ford 15'350. extended cab utility body truck witin utiliLv trailer fi'om F'airview Ford of San Bernardino. Cali~k)rnia as the lowest responsive and re:;ponsible bidder iBACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City' Council approved the purchase oF ~eplacc:ment vehicles as identified in the fiscal year 1998/99 budget docun~ent under acc:o[tnt 72-4225-7045. Purchasing iDepartments solicited proposats fbr a replacement vehicle, unit #519 that has exceeded its service lit::b. Purchasing mailed out 13 request fbr proposals on iFebruary 4, 1999. Bid specificalions we:re also posted, via the City's web page. After receipt and caret~l analysis of the responses, Fairview Ford was selected as the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder. Respectfully submitted. kW4qliam J. ) Nell City Engineer WJO:dkh DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY ()F RA N(.-'}-tO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 21. 1999 Mayor. Members of the (lily Council and .rack Lain. AICP. £~lx Manager William J. O"Neil. ('it,,' I.'.ngineer l)awn Haddon, .It. Buyer AUTHOi{IZATION T() P/!RCItASE ONE (1) INTERNATIONAl. MODEL. 49(i)0 4X2 AERIiAIL TOWER WITH UTILITY BODY FROM ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. OF DIXON, CALIFORNIA, AS THE LOWESq RESPC)NS1VI:):. AN[) RESPONSIBLE B1DDER IN THE AM()UN [~ ()l:~ S f .:.~ ....~. 13FUNI)E.D FROM THE INTER(i()VI~:¢RNM~NTA] SlURVICES ACCOtJNT NO. 72-4225-7045. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City t%unc:il authorize the purchase of one (1) International Model 4900 4X2 Aerial Tower with I!~ility Body from Altec Industries, Incorporated of Dixon. Calitbrnia as the lo~ ,est responsive and responsible bidder. BACKGROUND/ANAL~Si~ City (',ouncil approved the purchase of ~'cplace:ment vehicles as identified in the fiscal year 1998/99 budget document under account 72-4225-7045. Purchasing solicited proposals 10r a replacement vehicle, unit #517, that has exceeded its service litk. Purchasing maile& posted to 't:he Cit:y's Web site and advertised request lbr proposals tbr the replacement vehicle. Alier receipt and carefid analysis of the responses, Altec Industries was selected as the most responsive and responsible vendor. Furthermore, Altec: specifically met height: specifications tbr the side by side boom configur'ation, making bucket operations safer tbr personnel. ly submitted. Resp..er~. William .. ()'Nei City Engineer WJO:dkh REI OR ! I)ATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the (;it>' Council ,rack L, am, AICP, City Manager FRC)M: BY: Kevin McArdle. Community So:trices l)irector Paula Pachon, Managemcnl Analyst 11 ~/ SUBJECT Consideration and Approval of (:it5' Co-Sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All Star Game at the Rancho Cucamon~a Epicenter Stadium on June 9, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Counci, 1 review and approve the request from the Inland ["a/le), l at/) Bulletin to co-sponsor the 1999 All-Star ltigh Schcol Baseball game on June 9, 1999 at the Rancho Cucanmnga Epicenter Stadium. BACKGROUN D/ANALX~ SiS: The City has participated as a co-sponsor of the annual Inland Valley All-Star High School Baseball Game for the past tbur y'ears. This event provides an opportunity to bring together 48 of the haland Vallcy's premiere high school baseball players to co:mpete at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium. 'l'emn members are divided up on a North/South split with Interstate 10 being the dividing line. Pm'ticipants come fixma the following schools: Alta t.,oma, Ambassador Christian, Ayala, Bonita, Boys Republic. Calvary BaptisL Chafl'cy, Chmo, Claremont, Damien, Diamond Bar, I)on I~ugo, Eisenhower, Upland, (Hendora, Etiwanda, Fontana, A.B. Miller, Ganesha, Garey, I,a Verne l,uthcran, Montelair, Ontario,. Ontario-Christian.. Pomona, iRancho Cucamonga, Rialto, San Dimas, and Webh As a collaborative activity between the Inland l'all©., Daily Bulletin, Quakes Baseball and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City :is being. requested to once again, co-sponsor the use of the stadium and parking area on June 8. 1999 (practice day') and June 9, 1999 (game day); provide visitor's locker room for the game day; arrange fi~r secumy at ~:he stadium on game night; and provide field and thcility maintenance and clean-up of the stadium. Specific areas of responsibility have also been outlined in the Agreemenl :lbr the Inland l..5::dle.:!: Daily Bulletin and tbr the Quakes. The event shall be mm'keted noting the collaboration among the above mentioned parties. Net proceeds fi'om this year's game have been designated for the h~/and ~.,~/[qy Dai(3, Bulletin's Newspaper in Education program. The Daily Bulletin's request is a requesl: tbr a c. ollaborative agreement between the In/and Consideration & Approval O]'('ity Of/he Inland l/alley Daily Bulletin All Star Game at the R.C. Epicenter Stadium on .how 9, 1999 Pa~e 2 Dai(v Bulletin, Quakes 13aseball and the City to provide an Inland Valley All Star High School Baseball Game. Their request is not stri~ctly a waiver of City fees and charges but rather provides the City with a sponsorship opportunity, to be part of an event that benefits both the community as a whole and the youngsters of the Inland Empire. Staff' feels this program should be considered separately from the the and cost waiver resolut:ion recently approved by the City Council tbr the Epicenter. The tbur-year history between the C:ity and this event has provided the City with co- sponsorshilp recognition as well as revenues from concessions and admission taxes. Therefore, it is staff' s recommendation that City Council approve the collaboration with the Daily Bulletin and the Quakes to provide the 1999 Inland Valley All Star High School Baseball Game on June 9, 1999 at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Sladitm~. FISCAL IMPACT: City expenses (approximately $3,60(i))fi)r the benefit event would be offset, in part, by ticket and concession revenues (approximately $1,000) received fi'om the event. Respectihl [y submitted,/~/f Kevit~ McArdle Community Services Director Attachment i: St qJ.])'pt : a [Ixlarx 9 9 Designated Charity of the All-Star Baseball Game This year the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin has selected the Newspaper In Education program to be the beneficiary of the All-Star Baseball Game net profits. Each year the request for classroom newspapers has increased and because of limited classroom funding the need for sponsorships has increased also.. This program not only provides the newspapers but filmstrips, teaching aids, discussion leadership packages and of course the Thursday quiz as well as selected topic check- out teaching packages from the Daily Bulletin. Newspaper in Education * Number of School in Rancho Cucamonga in the program - 9 Schools Rancho Cucamonga Library receives 50 copies per week * Total number of school children benefiting from the program 1400 1375 Children receive papers sponsored by the Newspaper In Education Program. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. * Across the Inland Valley more than 14,000 children and adult literacy classes, are benefiting from the Newspaper In Education Program. Eight of the nine classrooms in Rancho Cucamonga are sponsored by local businesses and individuals. During the 1998-99 school year 212 classroom across the Inland Valley have taken advantage of the program, 200 of these classrooms were sponsored. 1999 All-Star High School Baseball Game Proposal: A collaborative agreement between Quakes Baseball~ lnland Valley Daily Bulletin and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide an Inland Valley All-Star High School Baseball Game. Date/Time: Game to be held on Wednesday, June 9, 1999 Gates Open at 5:30, First pitch at 6:30 Ticket Sales: Ticket prices will be $3.00 for green box seats {reserved)~ $2.00 for red seats and bleacher (festival seating). A special" two for one" coupon offer on general admission tickets, advance sales, will be available to make the event affordable for all. Net proceeds from the game to go to the Daily Butletm Newspaper in Education program. General Site: Only main gate to be open for adtnission. Players, staff and VIP to park in lot A Quakes dugout to be south team. Visiting locker room to be north team Limited concessionaire opening: on the concourse Terrace seats to be closed unless ticket sales warrant opening. Schools will be: Alta Loma Ft:iwanda Ambassador Christian Fontana Ayala Fontaria A.B. Miller Bonita Ganesha Boys Republic Garey Calvary Baptist l.a Verne Lutheran ChatIey Montclair Chino Ontario Claremont Ontario-Christian Damien [~'{)mona Diamond Bar Rancho Cucamonga Don Lugo Rialto Eisenhower San Dimas Upland Webb Glendora Teams will be on a North South split with 1:-10 being tl~e dividing line. Some adjustments may need to be made to make teams even in terms of enrollment. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin will provide: * Player liability release.. * Electronic and print media notification. * Selection process for the 48 players and 12 coaches. * Four umpires * [lnmserved ticket sales at Daily Bulletin lobby. * A special sports feature published prior to fi~e game. * Player recognition package tbr each player a~l coach. Package will include, hat, commemorative ball, certificate and photo card. * Reception for the players, their parents, am] coaches and sponsors. * In-paper advertising to promote tile event (approx. value $7,000.) * An advertiser sponsored gmne program [~)r the event to be sold at the game. * Printed unreserved tickets [br the gm'ne with one advertiser on the back. * Arrange for on site paramedic staffing * Provide fbr player, event staff tuxt VIP parking pass and signage. * Name recognition of all collaborating parreefs on printed materials and introduction of the sponsors the night of the game. * Credentials - photo ~md press. * Pre-game and post-game coverage of the event, Request of Quakes Baseball: * Announcing Booth ~md board operator. * Red seats for visiting baseball scouts (not to exceed * Two sky boxes R)r use by the Daily Bulletira * Press Box. * ()pen concession stands and Quakes gift shop during the game (no liquor sales). * Appearance of Tremor and Aftershock. * Promotion of ticket sales and ticket!; made available for purchase at all Quakes home games. * Ticket sales through Quakes ticket office for reserved green seats. * Two way radios for :field to stadium staff cmnmunication, minimum of 4. * Ushers, ticket takers t~ game ('lay personnel. * Two Gatorade Coolers, cups and ice. * Post game refreshments (sodas and ho~ dogs/pizza) for players and coaches following the game. * Provide full accounting t(~r ticket sales with check m the amount of the ticket sales by June 30,1999. Request of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: * Waive l~es t()r file use of stadium and parking area on June 8~ practice & June 9, 1999, game. Ticket: sales to be confimmd with the city one week prior to game. If advance sales exceed 5,000 in number, pro'king will be paid by the Daily Bulletin in an amount not to exceed $3,000. * Provide stadium tbr player practice (:m Tuesday, June 8~ * Visitor locker room for the game:. * An'ange for security at the stadium on game: night. * Maintenance and clean-.up of the: stadium. * Prepping the field pre and post-gam~:~. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Date Quakes Baseball Date Collaboration proposal accepted by the City ol:' Rancho Cucamonga Date City of Rancho Cucmnonga CITY O}:: RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. (.)'Neil, City Engineer, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND RELATED PURPOSES NORTH OF 11IGHLAN!) AVENUE WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE - APN 225-161- 19,33,32 lIECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary vacation of the ingress and egress easement dedicated by the William Lyon Company as a condition of Tract 13812, generally located north of ktighland Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, and directing the City Clerk to present sartre to the County Recorder to be filed for record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On October 1, 1990 tire City accepted an easement for egress and ingress and related purposes across a portion of land in Etiwanda as required by the conditions of approval for Tract 13812. The easement was tbr a temporary access road to be built across tire future freeway right-of-way. Caltrans has requested that the City vacate tire casement to allow for the construction of Route 30. On April 14, 1999, the Planning commission found, by minute action, the vacation of the ingress and egress easement to be consistent with the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, Will. iffm J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments WJO:MEP /,a¢ CITY OF RAN(~H0 GUOAMON~A ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: V- 163 TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT: "A" Cily ol' Rstncho Cuca. monsa WHEN REC~ROEO MAIL TO City of Rancho Cuc~non;a P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamon~*, CA 91730 RECORDED IN :990107 29 rr, 3' 53 CO., CALIF. IPAC! AIOV! 'frill LINI FOR RECOIIIDER1 UIII 90 472 34EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, rcccip! of whtch is hc~cby ~ckaowlcdscd, GRANT(S) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corp<>ralion,, an EASEMENT for 1 nqress and l.:tjress ,and Rel ilLeel Purl)o:;¢:'s in, over and upon th,q certain ttal propcr~.y in Ihc City' of Rancho C:ucamonsA, County o1' San Ll~tnatdino, State of CAlifornlm, D¢scribcd ~ Follows: $t':1'; A'I"I'ACIII'~D I:XIIiBIT "A" OENERAL ACKNOWLEOOMENT ,,11 I: ;',1 ?:~,'AI.~ __execuledlt PARTNERSHIP, /5/ qo-q This la to certify that the Interest In real property conveyed by the within Instrument to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Clly Incorporated under the laws of the State el California, la hereby accepted by order of the City Council, and the orantee consents to the recordation thereof by Its duly authorized officer. Dated: /0- /' ~0 D~/. C11¥ Engineer I.:XII I I~ IT "A" 90-4'? 134 lieginning at tl-, iptt. rsc, cticm c,I Ih~. ct.nter line n[ I,oc~tlsL Av,,nue, 73 feet uicle a~i sho~n on Tract N~. 12U4G in said CiLy as I._.r map recorded in Book ifil, I',age¢; I LhrouHh 7, inclusive of Haps, in the office of the County m~corder of said Cum~ty, with the ~orth line Lho City of Rancho Cucnmonqa and shuwn o~J said 'l'rnct No. 121146; thence North 0"30'25' Ennt ]II.{HI f,,(,l: Ln ~he TiIIII~ I'{}IN'I' [)1) !II.'.tllNNItlB; curve, concave Northwesterly and having a ra(liu~; of 29.50 f~,et, a radial bearinq to said point ht,a,':~ Fuuth 41'16'06" Nor[heasterly along ~aid curve through a central anglt~ t~f 4tt"lJ'29" an arc length of 24.83 fe,~t: tht.nc'e Lang,~t [o said curv,~ N~rth 0"]0'25" East 4H.OO feet Lo th~~ I~eqinning Of a CnnqonC curve,, conc;~ve Southeasterly and havinq a radius of 319.50 ¢eet: thence North- easterly al. on9 said curve throuqt~ a centr,al angle of ]7"02'09" an arc lentil) of 193.19 ree~ to the I)e~innin~ of a reverse curve, concave Northwesterly and having n radius of 280.50 feeL; said line o~ ~aJd South~e~L one-quarter Of Sec:[Jon 29, a radial h~.artnq to said point b~,nr~ NorLh 52"27'26" t~e~C; thehUe along said curve through a cenLraJ angle of ]7']4'35" an arc l~,ngth of 183.96 feeL, thence SouLh 0"[)2'01" East ntonq said East line 152.97 feel to a point on a curw,, Concav~ NorLh~esLorly and havin~ a radius of 319.50 feeL, ~aid curve also being concentric ~ich and ICasLerly, ]9.00 feel radially fromm the above mentioned curw. having n radius or 28n.50 feeL, a radial bearing Lo s,~id poin~ bears South 61"25'4(1" EaSL; thence Southwesterly along said curve throuqh n e~ntral angle of 8'58'14" an a~ JemlLh of 5lJ.O2 f(-('L Lo Lh~- I)eginnin9 of a FeVL'F~ curve; concave Southeasterly and havinq a radius of 2B0.50 feeL, said curw, al;~o being conceaLtic with nnd i~asterly, 39.00 feet radially from ~irst ~l)ove mentioned. curve hayin9 a radius or 319.50 feeL; thence SoU:Lh~esterly along said curve through a central angle of 37'O2'09" an arc length of IBI.]I feet; thence tan9ent to said curve South 0~30'25" ~est 48.00 feet Lo the beginning of a tangeriC curve, conca, re Northeasterly having a radius of 29.50 ree~; Lhence Sou~.heasterl? along said curve through n central angle or 48~13'29" an arc length or 24.83 feeC to the intersection with the gasterly prol:ongat~on of above described line having a bearing of North B9'29'35" ~,est and length o~ 29.35 feet, a radial bearing ~o said point of intersection bears South 42'J6'56" tqest; thence North 89"25'35" Nes~ 29.35 feet to the 'I'llLIE POINT OF BI~GINNING. Po~-,TlOrl op TH~ 5.W. I/A.. OF ~c.. ~.q; T. It"t,, F,.G W., CITY OP RArlcHo cucAl'l~orl~A EASEd~rlEnT I"tlAP FOI~ Irl~l~E$$ ~ ESKE~3~ ANDREASEN [NOINIIRINO CO, P,ome,~a, Cr. IU. 9176PJ 714 -625 -1595 RESOLUTION NO. q¢'- ~ ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS TO TRACT 13812 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4,Article 1, Section 833 !, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the ingress and egress easement for temporary access to tract 13812: and WHEREAS, the City' council tbund by all the evidence submitted that the ingress and egress easement for temporary access to Tract 13812 is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION l:That the City Couacil hereby makes its order vacating the ingress and egress easement for temporary access to tract 13812:, as shown in Exhibit '~[" and described as Follows: Those portions of the southwest one-quarter of section 29, township I north, range 6 west San Bernardino Base and Meridian as described in official record 90-472134 recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said county. All as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2:That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 3:That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: V-163 Area Map ,iAI! C~T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: February 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 98-17, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND ARROW HIGHWAY, SUBMITTED BY MIKE GIURIBINO RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security for CUP 98-17 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS CUP 98-17, generally located at the southwest comer of Hermosa Avenue and Arrow Highway, was approved by the Planning Commission on the 9~' day of December, 1998, for a 128,197 square foot public storage project including a caretaker's unit on 422 acres of land. The Developer, Mike Giuribino, is submitting an agreement and cash security to guarantee the construction of the improvements in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $29,250 Labor and Materialmen Bond: $I4~625 Copies of the agreement and security signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectful ly Submitted, City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachments 1-77 .J I i .,!Is, Ti L:,I, £ '/' N O. Ill- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA k':NGINE~RING DIVISION N ~'_ CUP 98-17 TITLEJ APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGMT. RESOLU'TION NO. 99-~7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 98-17 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of' Rancho Cucamonga, Calitbrnia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Mike Giuribino as developer, for the improvement of public right-ot:way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Arrow ttighway; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Plannirlg Commission, Conditional Use Permit 98-17. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineel" SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, AND ORDERliNG TIlE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15207, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUF, AT SAN MARINO DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY JERALD B. LAIRD RECOMM EN DATION: It is recommended that the City Council Adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15207, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6, and authorizing the City Engineer to cause said map to record. BA CKGRO UND/ANA LYS IS: Parcel Map ! 5207, located on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue at San Marino Drive in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 13, 1999, tbr the division of 5.5 acres into I parcel and a designated remainder parcel. The Developer, Jetaid B. Laird has met all requirements established as prerequisites to the approval of the final Parcel Map 15207. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submi.tted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROJECT~ITE 6TH STREET CHARLES SMITH AVE 0 ARROW ROU'rE Z .< 4TH STREET VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE C I T Y 0 F t.~ :~N C },t 0 C U C AdVi 0 N (; :\ KNGINEERING DIVISION TITLE: Vicinity Map /,-// tKE. SOLUTION NO. q q '"' ~ ~ C~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15207 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 152.07, submitted by Jerald B. Laird, and consisting of' one parcel and a designated remainder parcel,. located on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue at San Marino Drive, being a division of 5.5 acres into one parcel and a designated remainder parcel was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 13, 1999, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15207' is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by Jetaid B. Laird as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits t'br approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ttEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedic:ation and tile final map delineating tile same for said Parcel Map No. 15207 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15207 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WtlEREAS, at this time tile City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS SECTION !: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to tile Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT ASSESS~IENT DIAG RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING L,I.NINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 CITY OF RANClIO CUCAt '1ONGA COUNTY OF SAN BEI/NARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHTS: Dist. S1 S6 EXH IB IT "B" WORK. PROGRAM PROJEC'T: PARCEL MAP 15207 NUMBEI,[ OF LAMPS 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000[_~ 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.SF. L3B Turf Non-Turf Trees S, F. S, F. Ea. ......... '9 (approx.) * Items to be installed upon development of Parcel one of this Parcel Map. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment [.)'nits By District Parcel Acres S 1 S2 L3 B 1 I 2 I l Annexation Date: April 21, 1999 Form Date 11/16/94 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDED STAFF REPORT April 21, 1999 Mayor ,and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dave Blevins, Public Work:; Maintenance Manager APPROVAL TO AMEND CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. D-12, TO READ AS FOLLOWS: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $217,000 FROM FUND 20 (20-4532-9844), AWARD AN[) AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OFTHE CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, COONS CONSTRUCTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $216,066.40 ($196,424.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS, TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 20 (20-4532-9844. IT IS RE;COMMENDED THAT CITY COUNCIL REJECT THE BID SUBMITTED BY COMPUTER SERVICES COMPANY OF CORONA, CALIFORNIA AS NON-RESPONSIVE AND ACCEPT ALL OTHER BIDS AS SUBMITTED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council Appropriate $217,000 and award the subject contract to tile lowest responsible bidder, Coons Construction of Rancho Cucamong& California, in the amount of $216,066.40 ($196,424.00 plus 10% contingency) for tile Installation o.f Park ,and Pasco Walkway Lighting in Windrows Park and Adjoining Paseos, to be funded from Fund 20-4532-9844 ,and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Contract Agreement. It is recommended that City Council reject the bid submitted by Computer Services Comp,'my of Corona, California as non-responsive ,and accept all other bids as submitted. BA C KG RO UN D/A NA LYS IS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous City Council action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on Thursday, April 15~ 1999 (see attached Bid Summery). All bidders except for Computer Services Company attended the mandatory pre-bid job walk pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 99-073. Staff has consulted with the City Attorney regarding this recommendation. The City Attorney concurs with staffs recommendation. Respectfully submitted, J. O'Ne' City Engineer WJO:DB:dlw Attachments BANYAN Z HILLSIDE {.~ z 19TH ST. CHURCH SI', WILSON H[GHL, AND BASE LINE FO~:n'HILLl ' ^RROW HWY,~ JERSEY 6'I3.1 ST. 1 --! I 24TH STREET --7 I I N VICINITY MAP Installation of Park and Paseo Walkway Lighting in Windrows Park and Adjoining Paseos CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS Bids Opened on April 15, 1999 Item Item Unit of Estimated No. Description Measure Quantity I Install post toplighting fixture and post EA 27 2 tnstal! post toplighting fixture and post EA 8 Install Cambridge, post mounted area 3 lighting fLxture and post EA 25 Demo and relocate existing 4 fixture/pole'foundation EA 6 ~ ,.~t.:z, new th'ne ~' '- EA 6 Re-work existing panel and conduit LS 7 Install new meter pedestal "B" EA 8 install Meteffcontroller enclosures EA 1 Remove existing tinganon cabinet- 9 salvage to City EA SCE Underground 3" schedule 40, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 10 restoration LS 1 l" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 11 restoration LS 1 Bid Alternate 1 Install Cambridge, post mounted area I lighting fixture and post EA 3 2 Street crossing and pavement repair EA 1 1" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 3 restoration EA I Engineer's Estimate = $200,000.00 Computer Se~'ice Company Coons Construction Total Total Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid $ i ,670.00 $45,090.00 $1,000.00 $27,000.00 S 1,676.25 $13,410.00 $1,000.00 $8,000.00 Big O Enterprises Total Unit Price Bid $1,410.00 $38,070.00 $1,410.00 $I 1,280.00 Sl,350.72 $33,768.00 $1,000.00 $25,000.00 $1,110.00 $27,750.00 5930. i5 $5,580.90 $500.00 $3,000.00 $440.00 $2,640.00 $1,231.30 $3,693.90 $500.00 $1,500.00 $700.00 $2,100.00 S3,420.00 $3,420.00 $1,500.00 $1,500~00 S19,500.00 $19,500.00 55~906.00 S5,90600 $1,50000 $1~500~00 $4,990.00 54,99000 S3,236.00 $3,236.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $,i,990.00 $4,990.00 ~37.20 5437.20 $500.00 $500.00 $710.00 $710.00 55,679.00 $5,679.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $6,880.00 S6,880.00 $36,906.00 536,906.00 $92, t24.00 $92,124.00 SI,351.00 $4,053.00 $2,400.00 $7,200.00 S3,566.00 $3,566.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 S_,M9.00 S2,349.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $55,260.00 $55,260.00 $916.67 S2,750.01 $2,470.00 $2,470.00 $3,360.00 $3,360.00 Bid Alternate 2 Install Cambridge, post mounted area I lighting fixture and post 2 Street crossing and pavement repair 1" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 3 restoration Bid Alternate 3 Install Cambridge, post mounted area 1 lighting fLxture and post 2 Street crossing and pavement repair !" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 3 restoration EA EA EA EA EA EA S 1,344.00 $3,566.00 52,210.00 51,333.00 S3,566.00 S2,206.00 S4,032.00 S3,566.00 S2,210.00 S2,666.0O S3,566.00 52,206.00 5185,341.00 $2,400.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,400.00 52,000.00 S 1,600.00 $7,200.00 $1,000.00 52,000.00 $4,800.00 S2,000.00 S 1,600.00 S196,424.00 $916.67 52,470.00 53,360.00 5920.00 $2,470.00 $3,360.00 $2,750.01 $2,470.00 $3,360.00 $1,840.00 $2,470.00 S3,360.00 $199,000.02 Item Item Unit of Estimated No. Description Measure Quantity I Install post toplighting f'Lxture and post EA 27 2 Install post toplighting fLxture and post EA 8 lnstall Cambridge, post mounted area 3 lighting fLxture and post EA 25 Demo and relocate existing 4 fixture/pole/foundation EA 6 5 lnstall new time clock EA 3 6 Re-work existing panel and conduit LS i 7 Install new meter pedcsta! "B" EA 8 Install Meter/controller enclosures EA 1 Remove existing irrigation cabinet- 9 salvage to City EA 1 SCE Underground 3" schedule 40, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and '~0 restoration l" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and I i restoration LS i Bid Alternate 1 Install Cambridge, post mounted area I lighting fLxture and post EA 3 2 Street crossing and pavement repair EA 1 1" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and lxenching, backfill and 3 restoration EA 1 Bid Alternate 2 Install Cambridge, post mounted area I lighting fixture and post EA 3 2 Street crossing and pavement repair EA I 1" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 3 restoration EA I Unit Price $2,111.00 $2, I 11.00 $2, I I 1.00 $ I, 192,00 $1,237.00 $3,043.00 $7,382.00 $3,564.00 $640.00 §i4,208 O0 $64,664,00 $2,582.00 S7,83600 $-1,227.00 52,582.00 $7,836.00 $4,227.00 Young Electric Total Bid $56,997.00 $16,888.00 $52,775.00 S7,152.00 S3,711.00 $3,043.00 S7,382.00 S3,564.00 $640.00 5i4~20800 $64,664.00 $7,746.00 $7,836.00 S4,227.00 $7,746.00 $7,836.00 $4,227.00 Bid Alternate 3 Install Cambridge, post mounted area I lighting fLxture and post 2 Street crossing and pavement repair 1" PVC schedule 40 electrical conduit, including size and number of required conductors, and trenching, backfill and 3 restoration EA EA EA $4,095.00 57,836.00 S4,227.O0 $8,190.00 $7,836.00 .54,227.00 $290,895.00 CIT'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manage:r William J. O'Neil, City Eingineer Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager APPROVAl. TO APPROPRIATE $200,000 FROM FUND 20 (20-4532-9844), APPROVE THE AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PARK AND PASEO WALKWAY LIGHTING IN WINDROWS PARK AND ADJOINING PASEOS TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 20 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $200,000 from Fund 20 (20..4532-9844), approve the award and authorize for execution the contract for the Installation of Park and Paseo Walkway Lighting in Windrows Park and Adjoining Paseos to be funded from Fund 20. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous City Council action, bids were solicited and a bid date of April 15, 1999, was set. To avoid any delay in this project a bid summary and announcement of the lowest responsive bidtier will be submitted to City Council prior to the Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21 ;, 1999 TO: Mayor mad Me:tubers of City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FiROM: Rick Gomez, Conmmnity iDevelopment Director BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Distric:ts Supervisor SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION AGENCY ESTABLISHING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY TO FACIIATATE THE REFINANCING OF VARIOUS ASSESSMENT DIiSTRICTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the City of Ra:ncho Cuca:monga, the Ra:ncho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire iProtection District that establishes the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga :is continually looking for ways to reduce assessment costs to residents.. Lower interest rat:es have afforded the City the opportunity to :realize savings possibly to five assessment and co:mmunity fhcilities districts which can be passed on to the property owners. It is to this end that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency a:nd the Rancho Cucamonga Fire iProtection District desire to jointly fb. cilitate the refinancing of the public capit.al faciilit:ies associated with the various districts by establishing the Rancho Cucamonga Public F'inance Aut:hority. This public finance authority will el:i:minate unnecessary duplication and additional cost to the City by allowing us to refinance a nu:mber of assessment and com:munity facility districts under one umbrella. The public finance authority will issue bonds at a lower interest rate that will then be used to purchase refimding bonds that replace the higher interest rate bonds in the various districts. This eliminates the need ibr paying lbr the costly engineering reports and legal work iResolution of a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement April 21, 1999 Page 2 for several separate refinancings and instead pools tlhem into one financing with considerably lower costs. Another advantage to this process is that a larger number of the refunded bonds can be insured than would be possible as seve:ral separate issues. '/'his helps to lower the interest rates and increase the savings to property owners. Though conditions may change due to cha:nging financial markets, it is estimated that the districts combined could save approximately 8.5% or a total of $1.9 million. By forming this public finance authority, we are establishing the mechanism to take advantage of this opportunity to save money for our property owners. Forming this authority will not commit the City t:o any course of' action and any final decisions will be based on a detailed analysis of the current market conditions. For the above reasons, staff is recommending approw~d. ,R. iqk GO nh'e'z Coi~munity Development Director Attachment RI:~SOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO FORM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC FlNANCE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, there is a need within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") to finance and refinance the construction, expansion, upgrading and improvement of the public capital facilities necessary to support the rehabilitation and construction of residential and economic development within the Cit:y; and WHEREAS, the City, the Rancho Cucamonga iRedevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "District") desire to jointly facilitate the financing and the refinancing of such public capital facilities; and WHEREAS, the City, the Age. ncy an.d the District desire, ipursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of l)Msion 7 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, to enter into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the "Agreement") for the purpose of creating the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority (the "Authority"); and WHEREAS, the form of the Agreement has been filed with the City Council, and the City Council, with the aid of the employees of the City, has reviewed the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVt:'iD, AND DETERMINED: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the officers and employees of the City to assist in the organization of a joint exercise of powers authority, to be known as the "Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority." The City hereby approves the form of, and authorizes the Mayor, to execute and the City Clerk to attest, the Agreement forming such authority, in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk:, together with any changes therein deemed advisable by City Attorney and bond .counsel. SECTION 3. The Mayor, the Mayor Pro-.tern, the. City Manager, the Treasurer and the C. ity Clerk, and any other officers or emlployees of the City, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and. do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the fi)rmation of the Authority, including but not: limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and not incons:istent with the purposes of this resolution. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is located in the office of the City Clerk:, who is the custodian of records fi:)r the same. APiPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1999. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 2,1, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members o f City Council Jack Lmn, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Spec:kfi Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXiECUTE A iPROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWiN, DIVEN & BREWER, BOND COUNSEL FOR LEGAL SREVICES AS BOND COUNSEL FOR THE iREFINANCING OF VARIOUS ASSESSMENTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended tlhat City Cou:ncil approve the Profizssional Services Agreement with Brown, Diven& Brewer, Bond Counsel fo.r the refinancing of various assessment and community facilities districts. BACKGROUND: In doing a refinancing of assessment and community Ihcilities districts, it is necessary fbr the City to retain the services of a bond counsel. The bond counsel will prepare all the legal documents in connection with the refinancing, relating to the establishment of a reassessment district and the levy of assessments. 'The bond counsel will also review the "Assessment Engineer's iReport" along with those sections of the official statement in connection with the issuance of any series ot? bonds related to authority and security for the bonds, tax-exemption, legal opinion, litigation, sunimary of bond indenture, bond purchase agreement or notice of sale and other supporting documentation relating to the offering for the sale of the bonds. The cost for these services will be include:d i.n the cost of issuance for the refunding bonds. Even with these costs, the refinancing of these districts will still result in sigmificant savings to property owners. For these reasons, staff is recommending approval of the agreement Professional Services Agreement April 21, 1999 Page 2 Res 'l~e~y submitted, ~ .R. ich,,Gomez) Com u~t~y I~velopment Director Attachment CI'I'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack L~un, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Con~u'nunity I)evelopment Director BY: Ingdd Y. Brace, GIS./'Spec:iat iDistricts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAl. 71'0 EXECUTiE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITtl WILLDAN ASSOCIATIES FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING FOR THE REFINANCING OF VARIOUS ASSESSM]ENT AND COMiMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for assessment engineering services associated with the refinancing of various assessment and community facilities distr:icts, BACKGROUND: In doing a refinancing of assessment and community facilities districts, it is necessary for the City to retain the services of an assessment engineer. The assessment engineer will prepare the Engineer's Refunding Report:. Include, in the report will be maturity schedule, individual debt service schedule tbr each assessment, the total outstanding principal of the original bonds and the cost of issuance of the refunding bonds. Additionally, the assessment engineer will prepare a reassessment diagram showing the district boundaries and the subdivisions of lands within the district and confirm the proper addresses of owners and prepare labels and required mailing documents as needed. The cost for these services ~vill be included in the cost of issuance for the refunding bonds. Even with these costs, the refinancing of these dis't:ricts will still result i:n significant savings to p~roperty owners. For t:hese reasons, sta:ff' i s recommending approval of the agreement. Res. l~e _ 'y~~submitt.ed.~ C(~m 'rhqanj.L)M~evelopment Director CI~I'Y' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members o f City Council Jack Dam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Co:nux~unitv [ e.x elopment Director BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATIES AS FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO THE CITY FOR THE REFINANCING OF VARIOUS ASSESSMENTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the iProfessional Services Agreement with Fieldman, iRolapp & Associates for the refina:ncing of various assessment and community facilities districts. BACKGROUND: In doing a refinancing of assessment and co:mmunity facilities districts, it is necessary for the City to retain the services of a financial advisor. The financial advisor will provide services in connection with the debt issuance, such as the establishment of the financing timetable, monitoring the transaction process and review the official statement to ensure that it is consistent with Government Finm~cing Officers Association guidelines and industry standards. The cost for these services will be included m the: cost of issuance for the refunding bonds. Even with these costs, the refinancing of these districts will still result in significant savings to property owners. For these reasons, staff :iis recomn~ending approval of the agreement. R I ~bmitted C >mmi:ll'ffry'Development Director DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager' Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Brad Buller, City Planner APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE PLANNING CENTER FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2000 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NOT TO EXCEED $473,351 (TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 01-4333-6028) FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council grant, by minute action, this award and execute the Professional Services Agreement as endorsed by the General Plan Update Task Force. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In thais year's budget the City Council set aside $500,000 for a major update of the community's General Plan. In the fall of 1998, staff began the process of evaluating specific community issues that should be brought up to date in the General Plan. In conjunction with staffs effort, the City Council established a task force to review and guide the update process. The General Plan portion will bring the document up to date with current planning and regulatory provisions of State and Federal laws along with evolving City policies, procedures, and programs. The EIR will document the anticipated impacts. of the General Plan policies and programs along with providing up-to-date analysis of sensitive environmental concerns throughout the City and its Sphere of Influence. The consultant selection process started with the sending of requests for proposals (RFP) to several planning and environmental consulting firms in California, from which staff established a list of the four most qualified firms in early March. These firms had submitted their proposals for Scope of ServicesNVork, with cost estimates and were reviewed by staff on March 31, 1999. Of these highly qualified consultants, the team headed by The, Planning Center best matches our needs and budget for this project. In particular, The Planning Center assembled a respected team of experts that exhibited a high degree of understanding of the needs and expectations of the plan for our community. On April 14, 1999, the General Plan Update Task Force reviewed the proposal and agreed with staffs recommendation to select The Planning Center for the project. Prior to the finalization of the City's RFP, the Task Force requested that any special or optional work, recommended by either staff or the consuitant, be individually itemized so that the City Council would have the flexibility to tailor the contract for specific needs and total budget amount. At the April 14 meeting, the Task Force also prioritized the special/optional portions of the proposal for consideration by the City Council. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -. PLANNING CENTER April 21, 1999 Page 2 Staff negotiated with The Planning Center to keep costs as low as possible, for both the core General Plan Update/EIR and also the special/optional studies. The cost of the core General Plan Update and EIR is $463,351. Staff recommends adding a $10,000 contingency amount. The special(staff requested)/optional(consultant recommended) studies are listed in the prioritized order recommend by the Task Force, along with the associated costs as follows: 1. Fire Defense Study (special) 2. Hazardous Materials Analysis (optional) 3. Library Master Plan (special) 4. Park and Recreation Needs Assessment: (special) 5. Public Outreach Workshop,,; (optional) 6. Water, Sewer, Electricity Analysis (optional) 7. Public Opinion Survey (optional) $47,000 $ 5,000 $16,000 $4t ,850 $12,000 $2O,3OO $20,325 The Planning Center support for these studies is an additional $7,953. If all special/optional studies are included, the additional cost will be $170,428. If added to the core General Plan Update/EIR budget, the total would b.e $633,779. If the Council wishes to keep this year's General Plan Update budget allocation within the predetermined $500,000, the Council could approve the core update/EIR amount and then consider the special/optional studies in the upcoming fiscal year 1999/2000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the professional services Agreement with The Planning Center for the core amount of $463,351 plus a $10,000 contingency and fund the desired special/optional studies in the fiscal year 1999/2000 budget. Re~ectfully,~/~itted, Ric; Gorr"q~ Community Development Director RG:BB:AW:gs Attachments: General Plan Update/EIR Proposal- The Planning Center (under separate cover) .... THE PLANNING CENTER PROPOSAL: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT submitted to: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Contact: Alan Warren, Project Manager submitted by.' THE PLANNING CENTER Contact: Richard E, Ramella, Principal MARCH 8, 1999 PROPOSAL: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATEAND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT submitted to.' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Contact: Alan Warren, Project Manager submitted by: THE PLANNING CENTER in association with: STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSOC. RKJK & ASSOCIATES EARTH CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ENGINEERING RESOURCES HUNT RESEARCH CORP. THIRTIETH STREET ARCHITECTS PURKISS ROSE - RSI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH NETWORK, LTD. MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES MARCH 8, 1999 Table of Contents Section Page 1. THE PROJECT TEAM .............................................................. 1 2. UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT: OUR APPROACH ....... 13 3. WORK PROGRAM ................................................................. 19 4. SCHEDULE ............................................................................63 5. PROJECT BUDGET ............................................................... 65 6. TEAM QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................... 67 7. RESUMES ................................................................................83 APPENDIX A~ SUPPLEMENTAL QUALIFICATIONS The Planning Center Page i The Project Team THE PLANNING CENTER RICHARD E. RAMELLA Principal · The staffof The Planning Center has always been great to work with. That has made the experience productive from a pro~ssional perspective and pleasurable )~'om a personal perspective. . · John Wright, Director of Planning & Development Services City of Clovis RANDAL W. JACKSON, ASLA Principal Mr. Ramella will be responsible for the performance of The Planning Center team on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan project. He will ensure that the City's needs are being met in a responsive manner and that work efforts are fully coordinated and schedules met. He will be responsible for quality control. Dick Ramella is the founding principal of The Planning Center. He has been a professional planner for over 35 years. As a principal of the firm over the last 20 years, he has been associated with a wide range of very large projects. His participation includes strategic and physical planning, as well as contract administration and project management. The following are a few of the more significant planning programs with which he has been involved: the 18,000- acre Chino Hills Specific Plan in San Bernardino County; the 25,000-acre South Sutter County General Plan Amendment for Sutter County; the '105,00C-acre Urban Growth Management Plan/General P[an for the City of Tracy; the 47,000-acre General Plan Update for the City of Clovis, and the 10,000-acre Community Plan for Castle & Cooke in Madera County. Mr. Ramella's experience is not limited to large-scale projects. In addition, he managed contracts for a variety of planning projects, including the Highway 111 Specific Plan and The Eagle at Rancho Mirage Specific Plan, both for the City of Rancho Mirage; the Harbor Corridor Specific Plan in Garden Grove; the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan for the City of Newport Beach; and the Big Horn resort community in Palm Desert. Prior' to the formation of The Planning Center, Mr. Ramella served as General Planning Program Administrator for the County of Orange, California. In this capacity he was responsible for the development, management and coordination of the County's long-range planning programs. He oversaw the development of all elements of the County'=s General Plan. In addition, he was responsible for the preparation of eight new community plans totaling over eighty thousand acres of land and two community redevelopment projects. Mr. Ramella has served throughout the State of California as a guest lecturer for the University of California Extension Services on the subject of Specific Plans. He has long been an advocate of improved relationships between the public and private sectors in the planning process. He is widely recognized for his abilities to work with citizen's organizations, special interest groups and decision. Mr. Jackson will be responsible for directing the design portion of the Genera~ Plan. He will also participate in the development of land use strategies. Mr. Jackson has over 25 years of professional experience. Mr. Jackson has been responsible for developing unique transit- and pedestrian-oriented communities in California, Washington, and Arizona. He was in charge of preparing The Planning Center Page I The Prqect Team ,! ALFRED C. BELL Project Manager "I'd recommend The Planning Center to anybody.." , Phil Testa Community Development Director City of Modesto KAREN GULLEY Assistant Project Manager, Policy Planner JOHN DOUGLAS, AICP Technical Coordinator conceptual designs for the integration of multi-modal transportation des~igns into five existing communities in San Diego County as part of the San Diego Growth Management Strategy proposed by SANDAG. He also assisted in the preparation of the APA Award winning manual for planning practitioners entitled Land Use, Transportation and Air Quality Design. This Design Manual was prepared for San Bernardino County. Mr. Jackson also lead the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Three City Demonstration Project that focused on translating policies and programs embodied in the San Bernardino County/Cities Model Air Quality Plan, into actions that can achieve measurable reductions in mobile source emissions. A series of case studies on community design and travel characteristics were prepared based on the approaches contained in the Design Manual mentioned above. Mr. Bell will serve as Project Manager on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan project. Approximately 50% of Mr. Bell's time will be spent on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan project. AI Bell has been associated with the firm since 1980, and has more than 30 years of professional planning experience. As a Principal of The Planning Center, he has played a key role in a number of general plans, specific plans, regional and subregional planning programs, strategic plans, congestion management programs and air quality programs with an emphasis in Orange, Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties. Mr. Bell has played a prime role on the following General Plan programs: Cathedral City General Plan, Paramount General Plan, Las Vegas General Plan, Los Angeles County General Plan Streamlining, Stanton General Plan, Laguna Niguel General Plan, South Sutter County General Plan AmendmenL Yorba Linda General Plan, Temecula General Plan, Fullerton General Plan and Clovis General Plan. Ms. Gulley, who will serve as Assistant Project Manager on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan project, brings to the Planning Center an extensive background in planning and entitlement services. Her expertise is in the areas of community planning and processing, public policy research and analysis, fiscal impact analysis and transportation planning. Ms. Gulley received her Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics from the University of California Santa Cruz and will receive her Masters degree in Urban and Regional Planning from California State Polytechnic University Pomona, upon completion of her thesis. Ms. Gulley is responsible for the entitlement processing and coordination and preparation of general plans, specific plans and regional plans. She is currently assisting with the preparation of the Tustin MCAS Base Reuse Specific Plan. Mr. Douglas will serve as Technical Coordinator and will be responsible for coordination aspects between the General Plan and EIR He wil~ also be responsible for integration of the special studies into the General Plan. Mr. Douglas has over 22 years experience in the planning industry, including 15 years of management-level experience in public planning agencies. At The Page 2 P,'o/.,o.~,:~l.' Ram'ho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR The Project Team · It is with a sense of security that we turn to The Planning Center j~r advice and support.. · Arlene Andrew, Senior Planner City of La Verne STANLEY R. HOFFMAN & ASSOCIATES Stanley R. Hoffman, AICP, Principal-in-Charge RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning Center, Mr. Douglas has been a key participant in the preparation of general plans, strategic plans, and economic development programs, and also supervises the preparation of environmental documents under CEQA. Prior to joining The Planning Center, Mr. Douglas served as the Principal Planner for the City of Newport Beach, where his duties included economic development strategic planning; administration of the city's business improvement districts; directing the preparation of a comprehensive revitalization strategy for Balboa Peninsula; and managing the entitlement and CEQA review process for all major public and private developments in the city. Mr. Hoffman will serve as Principal-in-Charge of the Economic Development and Fiscal Analyses components of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Mr. Hoffman has over twenty-eight years experience in the fields of fiscal and financial analysis, economic and demographic studies, land use projections, real estate market research and computer-based financial modeling. He has managed major programs in both the public and private sectors, involving numerous presentations before political and academic bodies and professional audiences. Projects range from General and Specific Plans to site-specific developments. Fiscal analyses are tailored to the unique characteristics of each jurisdiction and are designed to project phasing and infrastructure requirements. He also has extensive experience in preparing financing studies and development fee impact programs. Major fiscal and economic analyses have included large-scale mixed use land developments in many jurisdictions throughout California. Mr. Hoffman has a Master's Degree in Urban Planning from UCLA; a Master"s Degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan; and a Bachelors Degree in Engineering from UCLA. He taught a graduate course at UCLA, titled Urban Public Finance, in the Public Policy Department during Spring Quarter, 1996 and 1997, as well as, courses at the University of California, Irvine Extension Program in Land Use and Development Planning. The RKJK personnel to be assigned to this work are the same individuals who have performed our transportation planning work for other juriisdictions. This is a strength which other firms sometimes find difficult to match because of employee turnover. The RKJK office is. located adjacent to the John Wayne Airport. Our telephone number is (949) 474-0809, our Web site is http://www~rkjk.co.m, and our E-Mail address is rkjk@rkjk.com. The following RKJK staff members are expected to play key roles, and will be made available up to full time as necessary during appropriate project phases. The Planning Center Page 3 1. The Project Team Page 4 John Kain, AICP Traffic Impact Analysis Carl Ballard Carleton Waters, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer Scott Sato Mr. Kain has worked professionally in transportation planning and traffic engineering for twenty-five years. He has done several neighborhood traffic control studies as well as numerous residential street impact assessments in Southern California. His work on freeway interchange ramp configurations and concept plans included two projects along the 1-10 Freeway 0Nashington Street and Jefferson Avenue). Mr. Kain will provide transportation planning services and traffic impact analysis. Mr. Ballard has more than fourteen years of full time professional experience in the preparation of traffic impact studies. His skills in the analysis of complex peak hour traffic distribution issues have been essential to the completion of more than 100 Congestion Management Program (CMP) and Growth Management traffic impact studies throughout California. Mr. Waters has been involved in all facets of transportation planning, from site access studies to regional transportation modeling and travel demand forecasting. Particular areas of expertise include alternatives analysis and subarea modeling. His modeling projects include: · Imperial County Transportation Model · City of Hesperia General Plan Traffic Model and Local Area Transportation Plan (LATP) · Santa Ana River Area Traffic Model, County of Orange · Beaumont Area Traffic Model/Analyzer · Town of Mammoth Transportation Model · Riverside County Staff Modeling Training Program o Moreno Valley Traffic Model Update o City of Chino Traffic Model Update · Ramona Expressway Corridor Study Traffic Model Washington Street/I-10 Freeway Interchange PSR Traffic Model Carleton was also a key participant in converting the 1987 Base Year' RlVSAN Model (a focused version of the SCAG regional model) from UTPS to TRANPLAN. His role as Task Manager for data collection, model validation, and future forecasts development involved regional coordination and communication with every jurisdiction in the western (urbanized) portions of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. He also used the OCTA EMME/2 based transit modeling tool to prepare ridership forecasts for the Central Orange CoL~nty Fixed Guideway Project Definition Study (1992). Scott Sato has worked throughout northern and southern California on travel demand forecasting, traffic impact analysis, and impact fee assessmer~l:~,~. He developed a calibrated Tranplan model for the City of Lancaster, assisted the Metropolitan Transportation Agency (MTA) in creating transit network alternatives with rail, bus, and HOV Pro/r'O~a/: Rancho Cu~monga General Plan Update/EIR 1. The Project Team Bill Lawson EARTH CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Eldon Gath, Principal -in. Charge Tanya Gonzalez, Project Manager components, and developed the Tranplan Transit Network Coding for the Town of Mammoth Lakes. Bill Lawson has experience in a variety of transportation related issues, including circulation planning, intersection capacity analysis, transportation modeling, parking demand analysis, traffic impact analysis, GIS and spatial information technologies. Mr. Lawson's project experience includes the case study for the South Street Extension project in the City of San Luis Obispo, California using MINUTP Traffic Modeling software; updating the circulation element of the general plan for the City of Paso Robles, California; the Beaumont Traffic Model development using Tranplan software; and the Mammoth Transportation Model land use database using ArcCAD software. These key personnel will be available to the extent necessary for the duration of the project, and no person designated as "key" to the project will be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City. Earth Consultants international offers The Planning Center and the City of Rancho Cucamonga a highly qualified and experienced team of pr'ofession~als to provide consulting services for land use planning studtes. The professionals that form our company are recognized leaders in the identification and mitigation of geologic hazards and in the field of seismic hazards mitigation. Our company brings together the tested and practical management skills of industry, with state-of-the-art knowledge and research talents of academia. This unique team brings to each project the necessary skills and the determination to succeed in developing workable solutions unique to your needs. Our mission is to help our clients develop solutions to their complex earth science problems. Earth Consultants International's clients form a broad spectrum of diverse interests and needs, from city, county and federal agencies, to land planners, developers, architects, structural engineers, and geotechni,cal firms. We provide geologic input to public policy and land use planning projects. Projects we are typically involved with are engineering projects, either existing or proposed. These projects include schools, roads, dams, tunnels, bridges, landfills, ports, oil refineries, and geothermal facilities. Specifically, Earth Consultants International provides consulting services in the following areas: urban planning studies, including Environmental Impact Reports, Seismic and Safety Elements, and Specific Plan assessments; seismic hazard assessment, such as surface fault rupture, liquefaction, settlement, and ground shaking; · input to seismic risk models and seismic design; geomorphic analyses for flood or landslide hazards; and geoarchaeology studies, including paleoenvironment reconstruction, and site disturbance analysis. The Planning Center Page 5 1, TtSe Proje :t Team ENGINEERING RESOURCES Matt Brudin Principal-in-Charge HUNT RESEARCH CORPORATION James Hunt Principal-in-Charge THIRTIETH STREET ARCHITECTS, INC. James Wilson, Principal. in. Charge John Loomis Principal, Library Master Plan Specializing in Municipal and Water Resources Engineering, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. offers a myriad of services including the planning, design and construction of domestic and reclaimed water systems and wastewater facilities. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. is a Consulting Engi~neering firm established in August 1996 to provide a broad range of professional servioes to municipalities and special districts throughout Southern California. The foundation of the company is based upon providing our clients with the highest quality professional services in an efficient, expedient and cost-effective manner. A private California Corporation, Engineering Resources is governed by a Board of Directors charged with establishing policies and procedures to assure quality engineering services to our clientele. Our offices operate under the direction of a Managing Engineer, registered in the State of California, who administers and implements the policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. is a team of highly qualified engineers with the special expertise required to serve municipalities and water and wastewater agencies. The firms specialized services include: Municipal/District Engineering, Water Systems Engineering, Wastewater Facilities Engineering and Water Reclamation Engineering. Hunt Research Corporation will prepare the update of the City's Fire Defense Study. As the author of the 1987 study, the firm's principal, Jim Hunt, is uniquely qualified for this assignment. Mr. Hunt has 36 years of fire service experience, including 16 years of fire protection and management experience and 20 years as a consultant to fire departments. His areas of expertise include fire protection planning, wildland fire threat analysis, fire spread modeling, vegetation fire management planning, wildland-urban interface planning, fire station location analysis, and emergency response plans. Mr. Hunt is co-author of two books on wildland-urban interface planning and has been a fire academy instructor since 1980. For this assignment, Mr. Wilson will serve as the Principal-in-Charge and Mr. Loomis will serve as Principal on the Library Master Plan and historic preservation elements for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan project. Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. (TSA) was founded in 1 976 and has based its practice on a range of projects, including new construction, historic rehabilitation and downtown revitalization projects. The firm is experienced in working with both the private and public sectors during the course of completing these projects, and has performed a range of services include master planning, design guidelines, construction documents and cor~structior~ observation. The firm is a wholly owned corporation between John C. Loomis, James C. Wilson, and Elwood Gulley. The office of the firm is Page 6 Prc¢~os,:d: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/ElR 1. l'he Project Team James Wilson Principal-in-Charge John Loomis Principal PURKISS-ROSE-RSI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE The Planning Center located in Newport Beach at 2821 Newport Boulevard. The firm maintains a ten person staff including six licensed architects and a support staff of draftspersons, secretarial and administrative personnel. The staff and all projects prepared by Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. are under direct supervision of the firm's principals. Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. has a diversity of clientele and project types, from residential projects to shopping centers, office buildings, industrial buildings, public work, restaurants, and historical rehabilitation projects. TSA's public work experience includes City Halls, Public Libraries, Parking structures, Museums, Art Centers Park Structures, and Multi-purpose buildings. TSA has experience with designing new buildings, rehabilitating non-historic structures, and restoring historical structures. Mr. Wilson is a founding partner in the firm and has over 25 years experience with a variety of projects. He has worked on projects in Rancho Cucamonga over the last eight years on a number of projects, and is currently completing the relocation of the Sam Maloof residence and studio. Mr. Wilson will manage the work for this project for ADA compliance, consolidation of the historic preservation elements, review and update of the City entry monumentation and will coordinate review and update of the City's library services. Mr. Loomis will complete the review of library services and prepare documents illustrating a vision for library services for Rancho Cucamonga~ Mr. Loomis is a founding partner in the firm and has been the partner-in-charge of over 10 public libraries. Additionally, he has experience in preparing needs assessments for libraries, City Halls and other public facilities. Purkiss-Rose-RSl Landscape Architecture, Recreation and Park Planning is a full-service landscape architecture, park and recreation panning firm providing creative, personalized services. The firm is committed to providing services which respond to the clients' aesthetic, functional and budgetary requirements in an efficient and effective manner. Our firm embodies a history of integrity and competence. Purkiss- Rose, established by Myrt Purkiss in 1964, has a wealth of experience in an array of projects ranging from the design of small intimate spaces to public parks and corporate campuses. Purkiss-Rose has been rooted in the principle of responsiveness to community needs. Under the long-time leadership of Steve Rose, the firm has successfully grown into a well-respected multidiscipline practice with a wide range of experience in both public and private developm6~t. For over 32 years the firm has gained knowledge and experience in park and recreation planning. The firm provides a full range of services i~'~ the areas of master planning, recreation, architecture schematic design, public input process, ~r;omprehensive construction documents and construction administration. We are presently the master consultants for several public age~"~cies and offer complete design services. Page 7 1. The Prqe 't Team Stephan Rose Principal-in-Charge Jim Pickel Principal Chris Cornan Project Manager: Socioeconimic Susan Jones Project Manager Recreation Systems, Inc. (RSI) was founded in 1972 and specialized in recreation planning and design services. For over 19 years, the firm and its staff were dedicated to the effective development of leisure facilities for government clients. RSI enjoyed the honor of being the only California consulting firm specializing in recreation planning and design services. Together the combined effort of the two companies has provided professional design services to over 1 15 cities, 8 counties, the State of California, the Federal Government and numerous private clients. The firm has completed construction plans for public park facilities totaling in excess of $180 million. The consolfdation of Purkiss-Rose and Recreation Systems, Inc. represents a total of 46 years' combined experience in the field of lanascape architecture and park and recreation planning. The talented staff of 12 consists of three landscape architects, two park planners, and technical staff of design professionals. Mr. Rose will act as Project Landscape Architect, facilitator and cont~ractuaJ representative of the firm. Steve contributes over 30 years experience in all facets of landscape architecture and park planning. He has worked on a variety of Comprehensive Recreation and Park Master P~ans. Steve is currently working with the City of Orange in the development of its Parks Master Plan. The project is currently in the final stages of development of the draft documents. Other specific projects include Recreation and Park Master Plans for the Cities of Temecula, Hermosa Beach, Diamond Bar, Murrieta, Big Bear Valley, the Town of Yucca Valley, and a Sports Fields Needs Study for the City, County, and School Districts of Santa Barbara. Jim Pickel will be the Project Manager and a member of the team and will participate in the master planning process. He will be responsible for the day to day liaison with the City, consultants and other public agencies. He will conduct the evaluation of existing and proposed facilities and participate in the planning efforts. He will gather all information and data and coordinate information sharing with our consultant team. He will participate during the workshops and make sure we have the manpower to meet our time line. Jim was the project manager for the Diamond Bar and Murrieta Master Plan Projects. Jim is just finishing up the Sports Field Needs Analysis for the City of Santa Barbara. Mr. Coman will be responsible for the socioeconomic projections, user' needs and demand analysis and operations and management review. Chris offers many years of experience working on recreation needs projections and analysis. She has worked with the consultant team on the Temecula, Murrieta, Diamond Bar and Santa Barbara projects. Sally Jones Leisure Resources Consultant will participate in the research and fact finding aspects of the project and provide information necessary for text development. She has more than 25 years experience managing leisure resources, as well as recreation and human service programs. Her most recent experience includes Page 8 ?'~r'O?O.f'::/l,' Rarzcho Cu~'amonga General Plan Update/EIR The P '(!ject Team RESEARCH NETWORK LTD. AND SCHOOL PLANNING SERVICES management of the City of Tustin's Community Services Department where she gained experience working as a staff liaison with City Council appointed committees that studied community issues and recommended solutions. This included updating recreation elements and developing and implementing parks and recreation master plans. She has worked with the consultant team on the City of Diamond Bar and the Murrieta City Wide Comprehensive Parks Master Plan as well as providing assistance on the City of Orange Recreation Master Plan. Research Network Ltd. is a nationally-recognized independent marketi;ng research firm specializing in the implementation of primary survey research as a foundation for market demand analyses. A Women-Business Enterprise, we have experienced, researched and analyzed the California real estate market for twenty year'& Pam Wooldridge, Principal-In-Charge MBA Ms. Wooldridge will serve as interface with the consultant team and client, in preparation of telephone surveys and will oversee survey analyses of the results. The firm's business is comprised of three primary client bases. The first two client bases are served by Research Network Ltd., while a the third is served under a subsidiary organization, School Planning Services. The Research Network Ltd. base of clients includes those public and private interests with needs for real estate development economic and market feasibility analyses as well as a second base of clients who represent diverse industries that rely upon Research Network Ltd. as a consumer research organization. School Planning Services, as a subsidiary of Research Network Ltd., exclusively serves the interests of California school districts with needs for enrollment forecasting, facility needs forecasts, long- range facility master plans, surplus site analyses and developer fee implementation studies. As independent consulting firms, Research Network Ltd. and Schoo~ Planning Services serve the interests of their clients solely through the recommendations provided which are based upon thoroughly compiled and presented primary and secondary research techniques MBA is prepared to take responsibility for project initiation and organization, preparation and processing of CEQA notices, data compilation, impact assessment, development of mitigation measures, ~eport compilation and distribution, legal monitoring and review, response to public comments on the draft EIR, public mee,tings and hearing attendance, coordination between the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and the Planning Center project team, preparatior, of the findings, and preparation of a mitigation monitoring plarh to the extent presented in the following scope of work. Report format and content will be in full compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga enviror~me~tal guidelines. EIR organization will include existing Page 9 The Planning Center Prqect Team Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D. Project Director Michael Houlihan, AICP Project Manager REFERENCES conditions, impacts, and mitigation measures discussions addressing topical issues. Text will be supplemented with graphics and summary taNes, as necessary, to present information in a concise and easily understood format. Work products will consist of professionally photocopied reports in comb bindings, unless other specific approaches are proposed. Dr. McGil~ is a senior manager with twenty years of experience in CEQA and NEPA document preparation, natural and cultural resources management, land use planning and water resources planning. He has prepared several environmental documents as well as land use and groundwater management plans for military installations and communities throughout the California deserts. As head of the Ontario office and a native of San Bernardino County, he will oversee every aspect of this project, including technical reviews, overall quality assurance, coordination of planning efforts with the environmental review process, generat cornmunity liaison and ensurance of corporate commitment. Mr. Houlihan has over fourteen years of experience preparing environmental documentation and managing supporting technical studies in California. Mr. Houlihan is experienced in both the public and private sectors. His expertise includes environmental document preparation and processing, land use compatibility analyses, fiscal impact assessments and the assessment of public services and utilities. Mr. Houlihan will be responsible for day-to- day management of the EIR. He will also ensure that all the elements of the project are properly addressed in the EiR. The Planning Center Contact name and address: Mr. Gary Thornhill Mr, John Meyer C/ty Of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 909694.1989 Mr. John Wright Director Of Planning & Development Services City Of Clovis 1033 Fifth Street Clovis, CA 93612 209297.2340 Ms. Joan Hoesterey Planning Manager City Of La Palma 7822 Walker Streel: La Palma, CA 906231771 714 523.7700 Page I 0 Pro/,o.!,:d: Rancho Cmamonga General Plan Update/EIR 1. The Project Team MBA Ms. Patricia Haley Community Development Dir. City of Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, CA 92885-8714 714.961.7100 Contact name and address: Brad Buller City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 909.477.2750 James DeStefano Director of Community Development City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 909.396.5676 The Planning Center Page I 1 Larry Henderson, AICP Principal Planner Alan Warren Richard E. Ramella, Principal ~ .... The Planning Center '" '.' Richard E. Ramella AI Bell Karen Gulley The Plan-)~ng Center Tow McGill Michael Brandman Associates P~n Woolridge Rese-~veh Network Tom McGill, Project Manager Mici~el Brandm~n Associates RKJK Cin'ul~tion Earth Consultants Geology Engineering Resources o! Southern California Public F~i~ities AJ Bell, Project Manager Karen Gulle}fi Aasistant Prolect Manager The Plomnlng Center Thirtieth Street Architects The Planning Center RKJK Community De~g~ l_~nd U~e Circulation HistogA' Resources I~bllc F~d~tles Community Dedg~ $~111~ Ho#rl~ltl~ AS$OCi,~lte~ Earth Consult~snts Environme~ud Resource,~ Econoride Development/ Geology ~ Qr.~!ity Fiscal lmap~ct Flood and Fire Hazsrds Noise Engineering Resources of Southern California Wato; Sewer, Flood C~ntrol Purldso Rose. Rsi Research Network Survey Jim Hunt Hunt Research Corporation Jim Wilson Thirtieth Street/lrchitects 2. Understanding the Context.' Our Approach 2. Und 'rstanding the Context' O /r Approach "The Planning Center'spro, mona/ per]brmance resulted in the approval of a $1.36 million General Plan and EIR without challenge." · Barry Hand Community Development Director City of 'Tracy 1 really appreciated that The Planning Center had our interests foremost in their minds and th~, did the best possible job that could be done in our behalf It made them stand out from other consultants in their field. -~ John Wright Director of Planning & Dev, Services City of Clovis Rancho Cucamonga has effectively guided its development. That is self-evidem 'The existing General Plan is comprehensive and well writl:en. From all indications, the document has served the community well. The only missing piece is a comprehensive vision statement that pulls the General Plan together. Therefore, the premise upon which our approach to an update is founded is that everything that serves well in the General Plan should be retained. The challenge is to refine, augment, streamline, and delete material that will make this not only a comprehensive guide for further community development, but a contemporary one as well. This is in stark contrast to an update concept in some communities in which the updated general plan is a wholesale replacement for the current one. We are enthusiastic about this project precisely because it involves a community that has been continually investing in its future for a long time. An appreciation for what has been accomplished as well as what remains to be achieved is the hallmark of a solid community. It reflects recognition of the fact that the community is constantly on its way toward the future and that reviewing its direction from time to time is just sound community management. Our understanding of the Oity's need for an update at this time is that: · There is a need to communicate the value and substance of the General Plan to newer residents who are not able to appreciate how it has helped to achieve the community qualities that brought them to Rancho Ouoamonga in the first place. In other words, the General Plan's constituency includes many more residential and business citizens that need to be "brought into the fold?' Oommunicating the update process and its openness to the entire citizenry is an essential part of the update process. Incorporating cumulative initiatives and contemporary topics into the Plan is needed so that it truly does represent an appropriate guide for decision making into the early part of the next century. · The benefits of geographic information system technology must be captured in order to not only enhance the graphic presentation in, the General Plan, but serve as an asset for land use adrninistration purposes after the Plan is updated. · Certain technical studies must be completed and documented to provide an underpinning for contemporary policy direction and to insure defensibility of the Plan. · Procedures need to be refined so that the General Plan is more broadly referred to as the basis for City decision making regarding physical development related issues. This will cor~tribute to a broader institutional and community awareness of the importance of the General Plan. · A means must be. established for carefully considering development proposals while the update process is underway. The Planning Center Page 13 2. Understanding the Context.' Our Approach Page 14 Our team has three modest objectives in addition to meeting the needs outlined above: · To assist in crafting a vision that captures the essence of the Rancho Cucamonga Community; · To assist in creating the most user friendly General Plan in California (meaning, one that is personalized by the community); and · To assist in preparing the most contemporary General Plan in California. Accomplishing these objectives requires two conditions: · A fundamentally solid General Plan upon which to build; arid A true partnership between staff, City officials, and consultants. The first condition clearly exists and there is every indication that the second is quite achievable. Our approach to creating the quality General Plan the City seeks involves: · Consolidating related information wherever possible; · Placing anything not absolutely required in the policy document into appendices; · Incorporating new GIS generated maps and supplementary illustrations and sketches; · If budget permits, creating a colorful General Plan Summary (probably in a fold-out format) that can readily be distributed to and understood by the general citizenry; · Collaborating with City staff to efficiently capitalize their areas of expertise; · Constantly thinking "implementation" throughout the update process and folding tangible examples into the General Ptan text; and · Speaking to the reader of the General Plan in the first person wherever possible. Of course, the General Plan update will benefit from contemporary data processing and GIS technology. That, combined with enhancing the written document, will serve to make the General Plan truly accessible to the wide range of constituencies for whom it is being updated Because we are building on an already sound document, our approach is to design the planning process so that we can quickly focus on the issues that need attention. The GPTAC already has an excellent start in that direction in its attachment to the City's December 23, 1998 memorandum on the General Plan Update. Sorr~e additional issues may relate to: Proposal': Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 2. Understanding the Context' Our Approach "Over the years, I continue to be impressed with The Planning Center's pro~ssionalism, competence and their drive to remain on the cutting edge of planning and environmental iu'ues." --Victor Holanda, State of California Office of Permit Assistance · Impacts of actions and programs by other levels of government: federal, state and regional. Impacts of initiatives taken by adjacent and nearby cities; Changes in legislation and results of significant court cases; · Aging of the community and its infrastructure; · Changes in the socioeconomic character of the City; Cumulative impacts of local decisions made since the General Plan was last focused upon; Shifts in economic conditions and trends; · Changes in community service level expectations; and · Shifts in public priorities either initiated by or responded to by community opinion leaders. The important thing is to think broadly and deeply to insure that the update captures the most pivotal issues requiring attention now. We do not plan to do work on policy issues the staff has carved out for itself. We do intend to arrange placeholders in the draft Plan for the staff: products to fill, as appropriate. Three tools stand out among those we propose to use for this project and they are mentioned here because they are so fundamental to our approach: Policy Option Papers. A few major issues that require attention will be the subjects of brief policy option papers that accomplish the following: · Clarifies the issue; Presents enough background so the issues can be understood by those who may not be familiar with it; Identifies policy options for addressing the issue; Describes the implications of pursuing each option; and Presents a recommended direction, along with a rationale for' the recommendation. We prefer to keep each paper two pages or less, if possible. If it's that shod, most people will read it. Writing concisely is simply the best way to obtain essential input/decisions from all parties. Backup technical material can be provided for those who wish to delve more deeply into the subject. We intend to prepare a first rough draft and subject it to staff review and editing to produce a final version. There may be some topics on which the roles need to be reversed, with the staff generating a draft. Opportunity Areas. Not every portion of the City needs the same level of attention in the General Plan update. Generally, the community consists of areas where: · Development is sound and what is needed is to maintain or The Planning Center Page 15 2. Understanding the Context.' Our Approach Page 16 enhance the quality that already exists; · Development is no longer of the quality desired by the community and needs revitalization or replacement; · Land is vacant and contemporary guidance for new development is needed in order to achieve optimum results; · Economic pressures are such that some change in land use or development standards is required in order to capitalize on changes in the economy; or · Change is desired for a variety of reasons and some means must be found to stimulate it. Any of these categories may contain specific areas that can benefit from special attention in the update process. We refer to them as "Opportunity Areas": places where change is imminent and requires guidance, or places where change is desired and requires both guidance and incentives. An important part of the update process is reaching agreement on the location, extent, and nature of opportunity areas throughout the City and its sphere of influence. Generally, there is no need to look at more than two alternatives for these opportunity areas. In many cases, alternative uses are not needed, but stronger policy and program attention may be. The update budget and simple prudence dictate that alternatives will be brought into play only where they truly offer the possibility of a better direction. Future Search Mentality. There is an approach to involving people in a planning process that enables them to find common ground where many believed none existed. It is known as Future Search, and it involves a specific process that empowers participants in a way that other public involvement processes do not. Because a somewhat different preparation philosophy and process is necessary for a true Future Search approach (it requires extensive preparation, an intentionally complete stakeholder mix, and a continuous two and a half-day workshop with follow-up commitments), it probably cannot fit into the time schedule sought by the City. However, some of the principles can be applied, especially with regard to major issue or opportunity areas requiring attention as part of the update. We propose to apply the following Future Search principles in designing the public outreach process for this project: Limiting the Future Search approach to a very few ~ssue a re as; Gel~ing the "whole system" in the room as it relates to the topic of focus (involving representatives of all interests to wlhom the topic area is important); · Focusing on the future, but with a grasp of the past and current conditions and what they tell us; and Conducting the process in such a way that individual participants are asked to self-manage their learning Proposal.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 2. Understanding the Context' O /r Approach experience (individuals and small groups take direct responsibility for their contributions to the process) under the guidarlce of a facilitator. What this process can achieve is identification of common ground among disparate interests on which they are willing to act or for which they will lend their support. It can avoid some of the dead- ends that often result from traditional consensus building or conflict resolution techniques. These three components--policy option papers, opportunity areas, and an adapted future search outreach process--shape our approach and appear at key points throughout the work program. Their use is predicated upon a belief that the City needs a true update, and not replacement of its existing General Plan. In reality, the General Plan is always "work in progress", although by law it has to be codified into an adoptable version from time to time. This approach will lead to that codified version. The following section of this proposal describes the tasks and products to get us there. The Planning Center Pa~e 17 Understanding the Context .' Approach This page intentionally left b/ank. Page 18 Proposal.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. Work Program .). IVo k Program PART 1 INITIATING THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Task 1.1 Team Orientation Session · The Planning Center is the only consulting firm I've hired that t~mpleted the projea within budget and on time." Phil Testa Community Development Director City of Modesto This section of the proposal describes the work to be done and the products to result from it. The outline of tasks follows very closely to the excellent outline provided in the RFP. Some modifications are made where we think they can improve the final product. While we believe that this work program is responsive to the City's needs, it is also important to point out that it is completely negotiable in order to arrive at a best fit with the City's needs. It is our experience that the most important step we will take toward a productive project is the mutual refinement of the work program based on insights the City has gained during the selection process and mutual discussion, using this version as a point of departure. This portion of the update process is designed to clarify what is to be accomplished, who is to do it, when they must get it done, and how it is to b.e handled at that point. Beyond that, initiating the update involves setting the stage for effective collaboration between the City and its consultants. It is a "getting smart" period for the consultants. Experience with many other projects suggests that investing the proper resources and attention at this stage of the project will yield substantial dividends later on. The City staff and consultant team must work in a tight collaboration if the work envisioned is to be completed with the desired quality in the time and with the budget allowed. This meeting is proposed as a way of organizing effectively for the more extensive workshop to follow soon after. Its purpose is to: Introduce key participants to each other; Share expectations for the project; · Hear from the City staff regarding insights they have gained from the proposal review process; Hear' from the consultant regarding work program or approach ideas on which questions may need to be resolved: Update the team regarding any new developments that might influence the update process; Agree on a division of labor in preparation for the subsequent workshop; Agree on a workshop agenda; Raise questions that need to be addressed prior to or at the workshop; ,, Brief the consultant on documents, studies, reports, etc. that may' be useful; and, preferably, Tour the City together, benefiting from insights and observations by City officials (Incidentally, some of the most successful such tours we have experienced involved one or more elected or appointed officials, but that decision is up to the City),. The Planning Center Key insights gained from the session will be documented by the Page 19 3. IVork Program Task 1.2 Preparing for Project Workshop · We were greatly impressed with the lead that The Planning Center took in getting the job done. The Planning Center .proved to be well endowed with experienced and capable personnel in managing ana integrating the numerous tasks involved from working through complex legal requirements to the clear and creative graphic presentations~ · . Rod Hardy, Vice President Sienna Development Corporation Minneapolis, MN consultant and distributed to participants. An action memorandum will indicate who must take what actions in preparation for the subsequent workshop~ Products: Orientation Session City Tour Session Memorandum Action Memorandum The project "kickoff" workshop is a critical event in shaping a successful endeavor. In order to make optimum use of this event and cover the extensive ground anticipated, an organized preparation is essential. Preparation would consist of the following tasks to be assigned to both City staff and the consultant team (subject to modification as a result of the Orientation Session): City Staff Assemble and distribute all relevant documents in sufficient quantities so that the prime consultant and the subconsultants have everything they need for familiarizing themselves with the community and its planning issues. Note: Everyone need not have every document, but they should have their own copy of the current General Plan because that is the foundation from which the work will proceed=. List known stakeholders in the General Plan update based on their knowledge of the community and the agencies, organizations, and individuals with whom the staff interacts. We can then begin to identify possible gaps. · Prepa:re a list of initiatives affecting the General Plan that are either underway now or contemplated in the future, whether or not they show up in any official document. This could include special studies, anticipated zone code modifications, neighborhood initiatives, intergovernmental collaborations involving the City, or any other similar activities that could shed light on policy that should be addressed in the update. Annotate, using a simple notation system, the current General Plan goals, objectives, and policies that are still appropriate, have been accomplished, should be modified, or' are no longer relevant. What this does is capture insight that only the staff can provide regarding the usefulness of current General Plan guidance. · Identify the General Plan land use designations with which the City has had problems, if any. List the implementation actions specified in the General Plan that have not been accomplished and indicate if they are no longer needed, lack budget or other resources, or need to be updated/refined to remain useful. Note: we propose beginning preparation of the Implementation Action Plan from the outset. Not only will this enable us to Page 20 Pr~!posal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. l ork Program generate a well thought-out and tested implementation action plan by the end of the update; it will also often shed light on policy issues that need to be considered. (If this action is desired, then what must the policy be to allow it?) Provide a list of the General Plan Technical Advisory Committee members and other advisory committee members who will be critical to the Fire Defense Study or Library Master Plan. Mark a City map with annotations showing where key issues have arisen that need attention in the update. Indicate also the planning areas in use by the City and note any refinements to them that should be considered. Also, provide a traffic analysis zone map. The City will provide this in hard copy and, if available in the City's database, in digital form, The City will also provide copies of the latest Census maps as may be available in its database to the consultant, Identify any additions/revisions to the December 23, 1998 Staff Report attachment on General Plan issues if required by recent events, Provide the current General Plan text in hard copy form and in the computer program form available at the City (MAC Pagemaker). Consultant · Prepare draft Guidance Package for elaboration and refinement at the workshop (stating mutual assumptions regarding the project, describing how we propose to collaborate, clarifying roles and relationships of various participants in the update process, and setting out some operating principles that will enable the work to go smoothly). Sort the issues defined in the December 23 Staff Report into at least the following categories (others may emerge at the Orientation Session): Ilssues to be addressed in detail by the consultant in the update process; Issues to be addressed only as a foundation for policy level attention in the update process; ~c issues to be addressed in detail by City staff for integration into the update process; and Issues to be resolved independent of the update process. The Planning Center Prepare a draft Vision structure for review and discussion. Enough is known or can be derived about the qualities that characterize Rancho Cucamonga to craft a preliminary Page 21 3. lVork Program Task 1.3 Project Initiation Workshop Of particular importance to me a.~ a Department Head is The Planning Center. s demonstrated abifity to communicate effbaively with 77~e Planning Commission, City Council and the pubtic. an obviously critical ingredient in bringing credibility to the technical p,vd~a't.r. . Mark D. Lloyd Development Services Director City of Stanton working draft of a Vision statement for the community. By working this aspect of the update early, it can be a unifying force within the planning team and still be refined as further input is available. · Work with the City's Planning and GIS Division to suggest a General Plan mapping system for review and endorsement or revision. · Describe a proposed public participation process for review and endorsement or revision. · Review City documents and highlight issues/questions related to them. · Provide a standard communications transmittal form for review and validation or correction. · Prepare a working schedule diagram as a working document for the workshop. Prepare a working draft of the questions to be considered for use in the proposed community needs and preferences survey By completing these materials in advance of the workshop and enabling participants to review as much material as possible, we can make the best possible use of the limited time together. Where time is constrained, it is usually more effective for those who are well acquainted with technical aspects of the subject to have materials in draft form to which they can react. It should be a relatively simple matter to agree upon edits to be made and responsibilities for making them. Products: Materials as noted above Workshop Meeting Notice and Agenda We envision this workshop as a highly focused dialogue based on the preparation that has been made. Some topics may be possible to resolve just through exchange of information; others may only require brief commentary or highlighting ("heads up" regarding certain items to become aware of); and still others may require focused discussion. Until further refined, the agenda would most likely include the following topics: · Review and refinement of the Draft Guidance Package; · Foc:used c, ommentary on documents to be turned over to the consultant, if necessary to highlight key features for special attention; · Review of the City's (updated) issues report; · Review of the consultant's sorted issues list; · Consultant observations from review of City documents (highlights only); · Sharing of observations from the City tour; Page 22 P~',,lw~,::d.' Rancho O/camonga General Plan Update/Elk Program Task 1.4 Base Mapping System Preparation The Planning Center Discussion/revision of stakeholders list; Highlights of City initiatives that may impact the update; Highlights of City annotations of the current General Plan; Discussion of problem land use designations, if any; Highlights of implementation action evaluation; Identification of "hot spots" or opportunity areas readily identifiable by the City staff; Review and critique of consultant's proposed vision structure; Review and critique of the proposed General Plan mapping system; Review and refinement of the proposed public outreach program and approach; ., Review and critique of the proposed public needs and preferences survey; Review and refinement of the proposed scope of work and schedule; Exchange of questions not covered elsewhere; Summary of action items and responsible parties; and Timing and focus of the next meeting. This is a lot to cover in one session, but many items can be resolved quickly and easily with the proper organization and forethought. This dialogue will set the tone for subsequent collaboration so it deserves considerable attention by both City and consultant participants,, Conclusions from the workshop will be documented by the consultant and distributed to participants. An action memorandum will indicate who must take what actions as a result of the workshop. Products: 'Team Workshop Summary of Conclusions Action Memorandum Based upon the direction determined at the Project Initiation Workshop, this task involves creating working versions of base maps for the Fire Service Area, the City, established planning areas, and known .opportunity areas. The intent is to develop, through GIS technology, a system of maps that can be brought into play early in the update process tailored to meet the needs of the project. Layers and details can be added as the update process evolves. Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC) will have the responsibility of preparing the maps needed for both the General Plan and EIR. ERSC will meet with City GIS staff and acquire City generated base map, including appropriate layers, such as land use and zoning. Evaluate the condition and usefulness of the map and Page 23 3. lVork Program PART 2 FOCUSING ON COMMUNITY ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITY AREAS Task 2.1 Community Conditions Documentation make conversion from Arcview to Autocad Map3 to facilitate mapping. This proposal assumes that the City's base map is of sufficient accuracy within the city and Sphere to be useful during the generation of General Plan exhibits. Any manipulation or verification of the map required beyond the simple verification of its accuracy (e.g. correcting street right-of-ways or adding new parcelization) is not included in this proposal. In addition, this proposal assumes that mapping for the project will occur at offsite locations, not at the City offices. The needs of team members for mapping products will be determined by the consultant and fed into discussions with the GIS Division. Factors to be resolved include, but are not limited to: Sca~es; Data layers; Display versus report exhibit formats; Update and retrieval protocols; and · Map information sharing among team members. Appropriate information and examples will be incorporated into a mapping guide to be used during the course of the project. The system will be critiqued at the initial team workshop and revised as necessary Exhibits will be prepared as required for the General Plan and Environmental Impact Report to provided graphic representations of the proposed and final plan elements and other concepts which will benefit from, visual representation. To simplify their preparation, all exhibits will be prepared using Autocad Map3. Upon final approval of each concept, the exhibits and base map will be converted back to the Arcview platform for final submittal to City staff. Product: General Plan Mapping System (initial and Revised) This phase of the update program will be devoted to insuring a solid understanding of the conditions, trends, issues, and potentials to be addressed in the updated General Plan. It will also begin the serious exploration of policy options City leaders should consider. There are many ways to document current conditions. Our approach is to organize written and mapped conditions in relation to the preliminary vision statement developed during Part 1. We propose to do this in both narrative and map forms. Unless modified through the earlier team workshop, we propose using the following components for describing community vision: · The community as a physical place: it's shape, dimensions, and key physical features internally and in relation to the larger region; · The community as an economy: the flow of income to and from the community and the structure of its system for providing goods and services; Page 24 Pr~¥:~o.~,:~t: Rancho C~camonga General Plan Update/EIR Pro ram · The community as a society: the nature and makeup of its people and their interaction with each other; The community as an environment: the resources and degree of :balance among resources that help sustain it and afford a balance with physical development; · The community as a system of governance: how it is organized to manage its affairs and its relations with other communities; and The community as a symbol: how it views itself as well as how others see it; its ongoing reputation. Each of the issues so far identified can readily fit into this structure, but modifications are certainly possible. The same format will be used to describe opportunities and potentials as well as problems and constraints to be overcome in achieving/sustaining the community vision. A limited number of policy option papers will be drafted, focusing on key topics to be addressed through the update process. The nature of policy option papers is described above in Part 1. We envision producing up to three such papers on topics to be resolved colla:boratively. Products: Community Conditions Report Opportunities and Constraints Report Up to three Policy Option Papers Task 2.2 Public Outreach Program This task involves completing the design of the public outreach strategy developed during Part I of this Work Program, and carrying it out. Our process will begin with interviews with the City's City Council and Planning Commission members. An interview will also be conducted with the remaining member of the General Plan Task Force. In the interest of time and effectiveness, we prefer to conduct these interviews in a group setting, rather than individually. Our public outreach program will consist of publishing ongoing one- page updates on the General Plan process in the City's quarterly newsletter The Grapevine. A General Plan update section will also be added to the City of Rancho Cucamonga web site, which will be updated and maintained throughout the duration of the General Plan update process. Publi.c Outreach Workshops are shown as an optional component of the Work Program, under Task 9.2.1. Products: Interviews and Summary Report General Plan Bulletins in The Grapevine General Plan Web Site Information and Updates Task 2.3 This 'task involves summarizing the key issues based on their Community validation or modification during the initial dialogue with the Task Issues/Opportunity Areas Force and others. This will enable us to have confidence that we Report are proceeding with the right topics for policy attention in the The Planning Center Page 25 3. Wor Program PART 3 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION Task 3.1 Policy Option/Opportunity Area Scenarios Task 3.2 Update Program Review update. Combined with the issues summary will be a final set of the opportunity area descriptions that allow for development and testing of an alternative scenario for each one. A revised draft vision package will round out this task as a basis for evaluating policy options and opportunity area scenarios. Products: Issues Summary Opportunity Area Descriptions Revised Draft Vision Package This part of the process will be devoted to developing and evaluating both the policy options for key issue topics within the plan and Opportunity Area scenarios geographically. They are consoil,dated into a single task description because they will be handled interactively. The key evaluation reference will be the Vision package from Part 2. The basic question to be applied to policy options and Opportunity Area scenarios is: to what degree and in what ways do they support and reinforce the vision for Rancho Cucamonga? From the answers to this question, we will identify recommended policy options and describe their rationale. The same will be done for the Opportunity Area scenarios. The objective will be to obtain endorsement of the draft vision package as well as the preferred policy options and opportunity area scenarios. Once endorsed, these preferences will guide the preparation of updated General Plan elements and will be documented in narrative and graphic form, as appropriate. Products: Alternatives Evaluation Matrix Opportunity Area Scenarios Preferred Policy Options Preferred Opportunity Area Scenarios Summary' Report for General Plan Guidance At this point in conducting the work program, it will be possible to determine if changes in tasks, schedule, or budget allocation need to be made.. This will be a major focus of a staff/consultant coordination meeting devoted to project progress and assessment. This mid~course review will be an opportunity to focus actual General Plan text revisions and fine tune priorities for attention. This, in turn, will facilitate making appropriate budget reallocations. Product: Revised Work Program, Budget, and Schedule PART4 This portion of the update program represents the actual drafting of GENERAL PLAN revised elements, based on the analysis completed up through Part PREPARATION 3. 'this is where the selected policy options, preferred land use scenarios, and supporting technical studies come together to produce an updated Plan. We will assemble statistical and graphic descriptions of the planning areas covered by the General Plan. From that we will assemble a Concept Map depicting the community structure, circulation patterns, tand use patterns and key relationships that will become the graphi~c component of the final vision package. This material will be tt~e foundation upon which each element is modified. It will be P,'~o~a/: I~ancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR Task 4.1 Prepare Community Profile and General Plan Concept Map Page 2 6 Program Task 4.2 Review Community Profile and General Plan Concept Map produced in workbook format as the basis for a third community workshop, focusing on the Community Profile and Concept Map. Products: Community Profile General Plan Concept Map This task involves review of the profile/concept package with the Task Force so that their insights can be folded into the documents before holding the community workshop. Input from the community workshop will be summarized and presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in a joint workshop. Refinements will then be made as the basis for completing the update process. Products: Task Force Meeting Community Workshop Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop Revised Community Profile and General Plan Concept Task 4.3 Updated General Plan Elements 7~sk 4.3.1 Community Development The Planrang Center This super-element includes land use, circulation, economic development, housing, public facilities and community design. They relate to each other through their common reference to the physical characteristics of the man made features of the community. Land Use. The land use designations, definition, and patterns will be reviewed, with particular focus on opportunity areas in which change may either be imminent or desired. Input from the special studies of the fire protection system, library system, and recreation needs will be integrated. Because of the nature and extent of development in the City, the focus will be primarily on areas where the pressure or potential for change in relation to current development policy can be identified. Updated statistics describing the current levels of land use policy will be contrasted with land use alternatives, calculated on a traffic analysis zone basis. Summaries will also be developed by planning area and for selected opportunity areas. Included in this analysis will be a survey of vacant land owned by governmental agencies or utility companies with an assessment of the potential for land use changes due to future surplus status of any of these parcels. Widespread changes in land use designations or patterns are not anticipated. Because of the complex system of land use classifications in the City's zoning code, particular attention will be paid to minimizing zoning inconsistencies unless there is a particularly :strong reason to do so in localized situation. Other aspects of the update may also generate potential land use changes, such as the economic development analysis or constraints resulting from infrastructure or circulation limitations. Circulation. The focus of the circulation system update will be upon insuring compatibility with the land use commitments Page 2 7 ;3. IVork Program Page 28 contained in the updated General Plan. Where re-designation of land uses occurs, the net change in vehicle trips will be calculated. The circulation system adjustments will be derived from the technical analysis described below. C, ity transportation data review (e.g. intersection counts, travel lanes, speed zones, street capacities) will be completed by RKJK. Because the City transportation model developed previously does not meet current requirements, the existing sub-regional transportation model available through the SCAG office in Riverside will be utilized (rather than designing a new model). Existing conditions will include evaluation of existing travel conditions in and surrounding the study area, based on available data from the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG, Caltrans, and the City itself. It will present: A map and written description of the roadway network; The number of lanes on key access routes and currently planned arterials; Signalized intersections; Key intersection descriptions; Existing AM and PM peak period traffic, based on existing sources (emphasizing CMP intersections within a five mile distance from the study area); · Existing levels of service, based on the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual; and Average daily traffic volumes (to be estimated in locations where traffic count data is not available). General Plan Modeling. Will be coordinated with SANBAG and SCAG staff to prepare future CTP model forecasts with the City General Plan preferred land use data. Trip generation estimates will be developed using the accepted CTP model trip generation procedures. SCAG will calculate future study area trip interactions between TAZs and cordon stations based upon the TRANPLAN gravity :model application for each trip purpose. Traffic assignments of future City General Plan traffic and through-traffic to the updated CTP model network will be included with a background of the CTP Year 2020 for areas outside of the City. Peak hour volumes at the key intersections previously determined will also be developed from the CTP model outputs. The AM and PM winter peak period traffic volumes developed in previously will be analyzed to determine the anticipated congestion levels within the General Plan study area. RKJK will evaluate study area roadway system needs based on daily V/C ratios for roadway segments and peak hour intersection operations analysis at the intersections where peak hour turning movement data and geometric data are available. RKJK will recommend roadway sizing/classifications based upon the results of this evaluation. Feasible improvements will be identified, where possible, such that Pro?o~,:d: Rancho Cu~'amonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. FJorh ?r ram level of service goals are satisfied. Locations which are impacted by growth within the City of Rancho Cucamonga for which no feasible improvements can be implemented will be clearly identified. A General Plan Traffic Study will be prepared that provides a surnmary of the General Plan traffic conditions and proposed long range improvements in an illustrated technical report. A summary list of typical figures and tables in the traffic analysis report includes: Study area roadway features (maps) General Plan land use data by traffic analysis zone (tabular format) · Trips generated by land use for peak periods of inbound and outbound traffic · Existing link volumes and levels of service (maps and table) Forecast traffic for the preferred General Plan land use/network · Link levels of service for the preferred General Plan scenario Description of improvements required to serve General Plan conditions (map and/or table) and deficiencies/impacts for which no feasible mitigation can be identified. The draft circulation element will be prepared to include: · The extent to which arterial routes need to be added, deleted, rerouted, or changed in classification; Changes in roadway standards; Multi..modal opportunities (Metrolink, Omnitrans, Park and Ride, Carpool, Dial-a-Ride, Bicycle); New facility requirements (roadways, interchanges, grade separations, etc.); Consistency with CMP, CEQA, and AQMD requirements and the Air Quality element; Signalization improvements, including, at trail crossings; Policy revisions related to street standards, private street offers; Ro,.Jte 30 impacts; Revised socioeconomic data where appropriate; Irnplications of regional transportation plans and programs; and Appropriate graphics and text to present the Circulation system ctearly. The Planning Center Housing. The City staff will prepare the Housing element. Coordination will be carried out to insure that applicable estimates Page 2 9 3. IVork Program and projections are internally consistent for use in all aspects of the General Plan update. Economic Development. This task involves preparing economic development goals, objectives, policies, and programs derived from the Redevelopment Agency's Economic Development Strategic Plan and additional analysis as part of this General Plan update. This aspect of the Plan will include such considerations as: · Existing and proposed economic development incentives; Balance of land uses and adjustments in development standards; Implications of the fiscal analysis; Anticipated socioeconomic changes; City and nearby growth policies; Labor force characteristics; Experience with the effectiveness of the Strategic Plan; and Positive examples of similar policies within other jurisdictions; These factors will be folded into the preparation of a draft super- element section on economic development for review and revision. Public Facilities. This Element will be developed through input from several sources elsewhere in the General Plan scope. Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs needed to supplement, modify, or replace those in the current General Plan will be derived as follows: · Flood Control. Based upon the analysis done as part of the flood hazards analysis in the Public Health and Safety super-element. · Public Facilities. Based on the Fire Defense Update Study, Library Master Plan Update and Recreation Needs Study. · Other Utilities. Based on analysis contained in the EIR. Community Design. The City's current community design guidance is quite thorough. We will develop enhancements to this material in four ways: · Include questions on this issue in a public survey; Interview key City officials to determine how satisfactory the current guidelines are - or are not; · Integrate community safety considerations into the guidelines (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design); Apply experience with innumerable design guideline packages developed for cities, counties, and priw~te developments; and · Incorporate the special historic preservation and design Page 30 Proposal: Rancho Cu~monga General Plan Update/EIR 3. lVork Program experience of Thirtieth Street Architects into reshaping the historic aspects of design guidance. Public perceptions of the City identity and design quality can be tested by carefully crafted questions to be included on a public survey.. We can use this input to help gauge the extent to which community design quality reads through to the citizenry. That, in turn, will aid us in deciding where to fine tune the guidelines. City officials work with projects constantly and will have a sense of where the current guidelines are effective and where they need work. We will tap into this insight as another major source of ideas for improvement. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is an emerging, yet fairly well developed design specialization that provides useful rules for designing spaces and places so they discourage opportunistic crimes (crimes perpetrated on citizens by strangers). The challenge will be to balance CPTED principles and techniques w~th aesthetic considerations. In some cases, security measures have been allowed to overshadow other design considerations to the point where functionality and appearance our unnecessarily compromised. This needs to be seen as a very important component of design, but not the sole factor. The Planning Center has prepared design guidelines and landscape plans for many public and private clients. Many of the properties involved are in arid or semi-arid climates in which the envbonment--particularly the landscape environment--must blend with the natural conditions. This will be a major focus of our work with the design guidelines. Thirtieth Street Architects have considerable experience with implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and will incorporate those considerations into the Plan's policies and design guidelines. The historic heritage of Rancho Cucamonga merits the serious attention it receives and our work will be to consolidate existing historic material and enhance it for ease of use and effectiveness. Thirtieth Street Architects will review applicable City reference material, outline a consolidated approach to this portion of the Plan and, upon approval of the outline, provide the necessary text regarding historic preservation. Two additional aspects of the Plan to be completed along with the historic preservation guidance will be a special analysis and documentation of the Hellman Avenue area regarding its historic significance and special guidelines applicable to it. This phase of work will also include developing recommendations regarding the appropriate locations and design of entry monumentation for the City. The results of these inputs will be a revised draft set of guidelines for review and revision, including recommendations for Hellman Avenue and Entry Monumentation. The Planning Center Page 31 3. IVork Program Page 32 Task 4.3.2 Environmental Resource Conservation Products: Draft Community Development Element Revised Draft Element (based on staff and GPAC review) This super-element includes the following topics: Land Water resources Plant and animal resources Open space Energy Implementation As discussed previously, the City's current General Plan is an effective and well-written document. Rather than completely re- writing the text, our approach will be to update, fine-tune and consolidate information where necessary. Issues for study will be identified during the Project Initiation Workshop, Task Force Interviews and Community Workshops. Preliminary ideas for issues to be addressed in each of the topical areas are listed below. Land. The status of agricultural land and mineral resources will be updated using information contained in the EIR. During the time since the General Plan was last updated, land use conflicts between urban development and agricultural operations or resource extraction may have emerged. If so, policies or standards may need to be revisited. Water Resources. Recent changes in state and federal regulations regarding water quality (e.g. NPDES) will be flagged as issues for consideration, and additions to General Plan policies may be appropriate, Likewise, the current water conservation regulations will be reviewed and new policies, such as requirements for draught-tolerant landscaping, may be recommended. Plant and Animal Resources. The EIR will include a discussion of sensitive biological species and habitat areas in the city and its sphere of influence, such as the kangaroo rat, gnatcatcher and Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, as well as wetlands and riparian areas. Sensitive habitat areas will be mapped and linkages identified. This information will inform the reevaluation of open space areas and policies related to conservation of plant and animal resources. Open Space. Since the General Plan was last updated, dew~lopme,nt pressures have increased on open space lands. The current: General Plan notes that the city is deficient in the amount of park acreage relative to the desired standard of 5 acres per 1000 popula,tion, The findings of the recreational needs study prepared by Purkiss/Rose will be reviewed and requirements for new facilities will be incorporated into the element. Should the City choose not to undertake tile Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment (Task 9,1/3), The Planning Center will be responsible for updating (at a 3. 7ork Program Task 4.3.3 Pubtic Hea/th and Safety The Planning Center more general level) the existing conditions, policies, and standards for parks and recreation facilities, in coordination with City staff. We will rely on the substantial base information provided in the recent ADA Inventory prepared for the City. The biological resources analysis from the EIR will provide guidance in prioritizing areas for permanent protection. Contemporary ideas for providing open space (e.g. transfer of development rights) will be considered and policies updated where necessary. Energy. Since the General Plan was written, advances in energy conservation technology have occurred. For example, electric vehicles are becoming more prevalent, and the needs for supporting infrastructure such as EV charging facilities are growing. Statewide policies regarding waste reduction have also become progressively tighter. These changes have implications for land use policies and regulations. The update will incorporate these new issues and correlate appropriate policies with other elements and mp ementing actions. Archaeological/Paleontological Resources. There is currently no discussion of archaeo/paleo resources in the General Plan. If there are no such resources of significance within the area covered by the plan, then no further discussion is necessary. The EIR will provide information on which this determination can be made. If the EIR reveals that there are areas where archaeo/paleo resources may exist, then appropriate policies can be crafted for inclusion in the document.. Introduction, The data for this study will be based solely on readily available information prepared and published by others, and non- confidential, non-propriety reports we have in-house. Subsurface studies, including borings, soil sampling, or ground-water sampling will no_~t be part of this investigation. Based on our knowledge of the area~ and a review of maps of the city of Rancho Cucamonga and vicinity, we propose to address the following issues: Geologic/Seismic Hazards. The current General Plan contains information and policies regarding slopes, potential erosion, soil stability, and seismic hazards. This information will be updated as necessary by Earth Consultants International and incorporated into the revised element. Geology. The Cucamonga fault system extends across the northern portion of the City's Sphere of Influence. This fault has been the subject of several recent studies that have shown it is capable of rupturing the ground surface and form scarps at least three feet high. The Etiwanda Avenue fault is also located in the City. We will identify on a map these fault locations, including the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Boundaries defined within the General P~an area. We will then discuss the potential for surface fault rupture to occur in the area, Mitigation measures that can be implemented to reduce the potential for structures to be located astride an active fault will be described. Seismicity.. 'The city of Rancho Cucamonga is located within 100 Page 33 3. Work Program Page 3 4 km (approximately 60 miles) of several known potential sources of strong seismic shaking, including the Cucamonga, San Jacinto, San Andreas and Sierra Madre faults. The San Andreas and San Jacinto faults both have a high probability of generating a moderate to large earthquake in the next 30 years. We propose to characterize the relative: ground motions expected from the known active and potentially active faults in the region. As members of the Southern California Earthquake Center, we have access to the most current state of knowledge on the various faults in the area. We will summarize this knowledge for all faults near the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Liquefaction and Secondary Ground Failure. Poorly consolidated sediments underlie portions of the City. Although typically ground water ir~ the General Plan area occurs more than 50 feet below the ground surface, in some areas it may be shallow enough to be of concern. Where ground water occurs within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface, liquefaction could occur during a moderate to strong earthquake Historically, swampy conditions have been reported around Red Hill, between the Foothill Freeway and Baseline, in the histdrical district of town. We will characterize the liquefaction. susceptibility of the study area using available local data. Geotechnical standards and hazard reduction methods in compliance with the County of San Bernardino that can be implemented to mitigate the hazard of liquefaction will be provided. Compressible, Expansive and Corrosive Soils. Compressible soils are characteristic of areas underlain by poorly consolidated stream deposits. These soils have a moderate to high potential for differenpial settlement when a large load, such as a building, is applied to them. Fine-grained silts and clays may have a high expansion potential that can result in significant damage to foundations and structures. Corrosive soils contain minerals that over time can weaken concrete or metal. We will discuss the geotechnical constraints that highly compressible soils, highly expansive soils and highly corrosive soils may pose to buildings and infrastructure in t!he area. Recommendations to mitigate the hazards as3ociated with these types of soils will be identified. In the Cucamonga area, soils with large concentrations of rock are also common. We will address these issues in our report. Flood Hazards/Flood Control Facilities. Urban development typically results in higher runoff volumes during storms due to an increase in impervious surfaces such as buildings and parking lots. The current General Plan will be updated to reflect the most recent mapping of flood hazard areas from FEMA or other sources. Current 61ood control facility needs will be reviewed by Engineering Resources of Southern California, in consultation with the City and the County Flood Control District in order to identify which storm drain systems need to be upgraded to handle projected peak flows during the timeframe of the General Plan. The potential for flash floods and mud flows in the northern portion of the city and sphere of influence area will also be reviewed and engineering recommendations will be provided to reduce these hazards. The Pr~posal: Rano~o Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. Work Program The Planning Center scope to assess flood control facilities includes the following: Research and Data Analysis. Gather existing master plans, studies, reports, documents and atlas maps providing information related to system composition, sources of supply, systems operation and future improvements. Source of information necessary to complete the flood control analysis will include, but are not limited to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Inland Empire Utilities Agency San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control Acquired data will be cataloged, reviewed and analyzed to establish a baseline condition for flood control systems. A baseline condition will be established considering age and level of existing improvements, current system demands, operational efficiency and availability of adequate supply. Impact Analysis. Considering the baseline condition, evaluate the impact of the proposed land use and zoning on existing infrastructure systems. The evaluation will be based on a comparison of existing and proposed zoning and land use and existing and proposed system demands. · Po#cY Formulation. General Plan policies will be prepared giving consideration to their impact on Agencies and Districts maintaining flood control facilities. In addition, if required, develop policy statements related to how the City conducts itself relative to impacting flood control facilities and how the City wishes to influence the outside agencies providing these facilities. Risk Assessment. Conduct a risk assessment of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire protection District to identify current and potential target hazards, major Hazardous Materials threats, wildland urban interface fire threats and other risks which can impact the fire service delivery system, Provide fire spread modeling for the urban/wildland fire risk. Noise. The Noise Element, a mandated component of the General Plan, contains data and analyses, policies and their means of implementation as related to the noise environment. Specifically, State law, Government Code Section 65302(0, requires that the General Plan include a Noise Element which identifies and evaluates noise problems in the community. The Element must recognize the guidelines adopted by the State Office of Noise Control. Finally, it must analyze and quantify current and projected noise levels for mobile sources including that produced along highways, freeways, primary arterials, and major local streets, aircraft operations, railroad operations, local large-scale industrial facilities, and other ground- based staticmary sources identified by local agencies as Page 3 5 3. lVork Program Page 36 contributing to the community noise environment. The Planning Center proposes a technical approach that will both meet the needs of the City and produce an exemplary document in which the City can take pride. Our proposed scope of work is to inctu.de: An update the Noise Element to include a discussion of the effects of noise on the local population as well as land use compatibility issues. These can range from minor annoyance to the determent of health. These effects and the noise levels necessary to invoke them shall be based on a comprehensive literature review and discussed in the document~ A discussion of appropriate standards and criteria for noise exposure. These standards shall be based on noise levels where activity interference is kept to a minimum, and annoyance levels are still low but can realistically be achieved. At this time we envision that the criteria shall include both the State recommendations for land use compatibility with modification to reduce annoyance factors. For example, the State standard is stated in terms of an allowable 24-hour, time-weighted average. However, as short-term noise of excessive volume may constitute a nuisance, the selected criteria shall also include maximum allowable noise levels over various periods of time both during the day and at night when receptors are more sensitive to noise intrusion. All'criteria shall be developed in consultation with the City to ensure that the planning goals are met. · Identification and appraisal of existing noise sources within the City. Noise monitoring shall be conducted using a certified Type 2 noise meter. The meter shall be calibrated on a daily basis. No less than 20 measurements shall be obtained in representative areas. Areas to be monitored shall be based on both existing and future planned land uses and subject to City approval. To the extent reasonably feasible, noise measurements obtained along major arterial roadways shall be accompanied by vehicle counts. This, vehicle-generated noise shall then be modeled using the F.H.W.A. Highway Noise Prediction Model using California Vehicle Emission Noise (CALVENO) curves. This allows for calibration of the model which is subsequently used to generate noise contours along major City-wide roadways. · F.H.W.A. Noise Prediction Modeling to determine traffic- generated noise along major arterial roadways. The projected noise levels shall be included in a contour map which illustrates the distances to various acceptable noise levels for various types of land uses (e.g. 70, 65 and 60 dBA CNEL). The model provides for the inclusion of sound walls. However, it must be noted that the attenuation provided by a sound wall is related to not only its Pr~posal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. IVork Program The Planning Center construction and height, but also its position relative to both the traffic and receptor. While it is infeasible to predict the resultant noise at each "protected" resident's dwelling, a more generic analysis can and will be provided. (E.g., assume various distances from the wall to the traffic and receptor and calculate the resultant attenuation accordingly.) These data will be tabulated for ease of reference and from this table resultant noise levels may be ascertained. Additionally, the specific areas identified during our initial consultation, will be modeled both without and with the inclusion of existing sound walls using parameters and distances identified in the field study. Identification of existing noise sensitive land uses, including residential areas, schools, and churches. These uses shall be ascertained from the Land Use Element, from the field survey, and consultation with City Staff. Noise sensitive land uses shall be plotted on a map of the City. Using traffic data, vehicle noise curves shall be developed and overlaid on this map. Major stationary sources of noise such as large-scale factories, shall also be documented in the field study and also included on the map. Vehicle noise modeling using build-out vehicle projections and the F.H.W.A. Noise Prediction model to determine future projected noise contours. Where these data project land use compatibility conflicts, methods to reduce this noise shall be discussed. These methods could include restrictions on heavy trucks, the use of sound walls, alternative types of paving materials, building set-backs, alternative land uses. · A discussion of the Noise Element in relation to other relevant sections including the Land Use and Transportation Elernents of the General Plan. Incompatibilities and discrepancies shall be brought to the attention of City Staff and methods to resolve any such problems will be explored prior to the submittal of a draft document. · , A discussion of applicable techniques that may effectively be used to reduce excessive noise within the City. Current techniques to reduce vehicle-generated noise as well as future techniques under consideration shall be determined through consultation with Caltrans, as well as, a literature review. Stationary sources of noise may be reduced via methods which physically shield noisy pieces of equipment, or though the use of the muffler and air intake restriction systems. Areas where existing noise cannot feasibly be reduced shall also be noted and land use restrictions on adioining parcels may be required. In addition to the preparation of the Noise Element, The Planning Center shall also review the local noise ordinance. While direct revisions to the ordinance are not included in the Scope of Work to be p~"ovided, we will provide written comment on the applicably of Page 3 7 3. I ork Program Page 3 8 the ordinance and any conflicts between the ordinance and the Element. Air quality. While the City has may feel that it has little control over the local air quality, it does have the ability to determine land use policy which ultimately affects local emissions. Furthermore, the City has the ability to cite sensitive land uses away from large-scale industry and major thoroughfares. Finally, the City has the ability to encourage the use of high efficiency/low emissions equipment and appliances through the issuance of Conditional Use Permits. Our proposed scope of work is to include: · A summary of the existing setting which provides an overview of both local meteorological phenomenon as well as the existing air quality conditions including a description of pollutants of concern and their effects on both the environment. The most current five years of data as monitored at the most proximate monitoring station operated by the SCAQMD shall also be included. A summary of the existing regulatory setting including the role of the federal and State agencies as well as local agencies including the SCAQMD and SCAG and their requirements as related to the City. The secqion discusses the current status of the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan. A r'eview of air emissions generated within the City as it now exists. As feasible, based on existing land uses, the analysis shall use the California Air Resources Board's URBEMIS?G model to project the daily volume of emissions generated within the City. A projection of air emissions generated within the City at build-out as feasible. This analysis will again use the URBEMIS?G model to project future emissions generated witiin the City. · A discussion of citing criteria for proposed land uses to assure compatibility. ~ A discussion of land use planning techniques to reduce emissions. The document shall discuss the issues of mixed use as well as regional development to reduce both the number and length of vehicle trips. A discussion of measures that can reduce both mobile and stationary source emissions. In addition to emissions savings gained though land use planning, substantial emissions reductions can also be gained though transportation enhancement measures. Such measures to be discussed include, but are not limited to, enhanced traffic flow though intersection design and stoplight timing, methods to encourage ride sharing, and the benefits of reduced emissions public transportation. Additionally, stationary source emissions reductions are available Propos~l: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. l /ork Program through the use of such things as increased insulation, thermal windows, and high efficiency/low emissions appliances and lighting. Through the issuance of conditional use permits, the City Planning Commission has the ability to require implementation of such measures prior to construction and make a real contribution to local emissions reductions. A discussion of the Noise Element in relation to other relevant sections including the Land Use and Transportation Bements of the General Plan. Incompatibilities and discrepancies shall be brought to the attention of City Staff and methods to resolve any such problems will be explored prior to the submittal of a draft document. Fire Protection. Fire protection is a mandated component of the General Plan (Cal. Govt. Code Sec 65302(g)). The Fire Protection portion of the element will be updated to reflect the findings of the Fire Defense Study Update (see Task 9.1 below). Goals, objectives and policies will be reviewed and updated where necessary to reflect current conditions and priorities and will be correlated with othe,' components of the General Plan. Hunt Research Corporation will provide a cursory-level Risk Assessment will be prepared to identify current and potential target hazards, wildland urban interface threats, hazardous materials threats, emergency medical services impacts, and other risks which can impact the fire service delivery system. This task will also include analyzing current level of service and standards of coverage based upon the results of the risk assessment and nationally accepted standards and good practice. Huni~ Research will identify the capabilities of the first alarm units, determine levels of protected risk, and make recommendations as the risk-based standards of coverage and levels of service. Current and proposed fire station locations will be reviewed, in conjunction with growth projections for the community. We will make recommendations for additional stations (if any) and modifications/relocations if appropriate. Emergency Services. This section of the document will be updated to reflect current City policies and procedures for ennergen:cy services and disaster preparedness. Other Nat,,ral Hazards. Other hazards discussed in the current General Plan include wind and eucalyptus windrows. This information will be updated and mapped. Prod,,cts: Technical Background Report. Each of the natural or man-made issues described above (e.g. geology/seismic hazards, flood hazards/flood control, fire hazards, noise and air quality) will be discussed in a separate chapter or section of the Technical Background Report that we will prepare as a deliverable. The Planrang Center Page 3 9 3. IVork Program Task4.3.4 Implementation Action Plan Task 4.4 Document Preparation PART5 ENWRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Page 40 Draft public Health and Safety Super Element Revised Draft Element (based on staff and GPAC review) Emergency Preparedness Handout. Portions of this element will be designed in a handout format that the City can distribute to its residents, as part of their Community Participation Program. This handout document will highlight evacuation routes, emergency shelters, hospitals and urgent care facilities, and other critical' facilities in the area. The handout will also describe actions that individuals, families and neighborhoods can take now to identify and correct hazardous conditions at home and in the workplace than can significantly reduce the damage caused by an earthquake or another catastrophe. As discussed in Section 2, Approach, we propose to begin preparation of the Implementation Action Plan very early in the update process. This offers three main advantages: It gets everyone thinking about implementation; It allows for more deliberate and thoughtful consideration of desired City commitments; and It provides feedback to current and proposed Plan policies, testing their practicality and value by considering what will realistically be done about them. We envision the Implementation Action Plan being organized by Element, but capable of being sorted by any field. The Plan would address: Policy Reference; Proposed Actions; Responsible Parties; Supporting Responsibilities; · Priority; and Funding Source; Product: Draft and Final Implementation Action Plan Once the draft elements, Implementation Program, technical reports and other appendices have been prepared, the Planning Center will assemble the General Plan text and exhibits into a Hearing Draft. A record of comments and revisions will be maintained through the public hearing process as a separate document. Once the City Council approves the general Plan, with revisions, we will incorporate all the changes into the final document. MBA is prepared to take responsibility for project initiation and organization, preparation and processing of CEQA notices, data compilation, impact assessment, development of mitigation measures, report compilation and distribution, legal monitoring and Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3, 7ork Program The Planning Center review, response to public comments on the draft EIR, public meetings and hearing attendance, coordination between the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and the Planning Center project team, preparation of the findings, and preparation of a mitigation monitoring plan, to the extent presented in the following scope of work. Report format and content will be in full compliance with CEQA, the State; CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga environmental guidelines. EIR organization will include existing conditions,, impacts, and mitigation measures discussions addressing topical issues. Text will be supplemented with graphics and summary tables, as necessary, to present information in a concise and easily understood format. Work products will consist of professionally photocopied reports in comb bindings, unless other specific approaches are proposed. Project Initiation and Organization. Purpose. To obtain information necessary for preparation of complete "proposed project" and "alternatives" descriptions, to establish early communication among various project team members, and to familiarize the MBA project team with the issues and concerns identified for analysis. Approach. Attend initial orientation meeting with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and The Planning Center to review the proposed project scope of work and to determine which elements will be included in descriptions of the project and alternatives to the proposed project. · Receive a description of the General Plan update, approved by tile City of Rancho Cucamonga, that will be used to develop an EIR project description. Information will include update objectives, detailed changes to the plan, existing and proposed land use data, a narrative program description, and design graphic renderings sufficient to depict the goals and directions of the new General Plan. · Receive alternatives to the proposed update to the General Plan (i.e., conceptual plans and/or alternatives for the various sections of the General Plan) that are sufficient to develop the EIR description of alternatives to the proposed pro3ect. · . Refine the proiect schedule, based on agreements reached during contract negotiations and on information discussed at the initial meeting. · Receive all existing reference and research materials related to the project, the project site, and the vicinity, including base maps.. aerial photographs, and recent local EIRs; distribute, as appropriate, to project team members. · , Conduct an in-house MBA project team start-up meeting to Page 41 3. IVork Program Task 5.1 Initial Study and Notice of Preparation Task 5.1.1 Scoping Process Page 42 initiate work efforts of all team members. Products: One (1) orientation meeting with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and The Planning Center. Refined project scope of work and revised schedule, if needed. Purpose. To prepare an Initial Study evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the updating the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and identifying issues that require evaluation in the EIR. Approach. · Prepare an Initial Study, according to CEQA requirements, the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15063), and procedures of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Initial Study will comply with the content requirements of recent case law, specifically Citizens Association for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of Inyo (1985) and Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988), wherein both a checklist of impacts and reasoned explanations of the findings of the study are needed. To the extent desired by City of Rancho Cucamonga, MBA will informally consult by telephone with other responsible and affected agencies to define their issues of concern. The Initial Study's findings will be prepared in coordination with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and the Planning Center proiect team. · Identify issues for which no significant impacts will occur (therefore needing no additional consideration) and identify topics that will require further evaluation in the EIR. This will narrow and precisely define the scope of the EIR, will provide a strategic action plan for completing the environmental process as efficiently as possible, and will determine the most effective approach for addressing the consultations and approvals of other agencies. Prepare a draft Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga review. Following receipt of comments on the draft Initial Study, revise and use the final Initial Study with the Notice of Preparation. Products: 15 copies of the draft Initial Study. 100 copies of the final Initial Study/Notice of Preparation. Purpose. To participate in a scoping process to seek input from the public and affected agencies regarding the issues that require evaluation in the EIR Approach. · Participate in one public/agency scoping meeting conducted by City of Rancho Cucamonga and make a presentation on the environmental process. Prepare Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR Work Program Task 5.2 Screen Check EIR The Planning Center graphics and handouts, for the meeting, that describe environmental issues and processes. Receive and review other available community and agency information. · After completion of the scoping process and receipt of Notice of Preparation responses, identify issues for which no significant impacts will occur (to be described as effects found not to be significant in the EIR) and identify potentially significant impact topics, discussed during the scoping process, that will require further evaluation in the EIR. Submit a memorandum to City of Rancho Cucamonga sumrnarizing issues identified in the scoping process. · Review and refine, if needed, the scope of work, the schedule, and the budget for the EIR, based on the results of the scoping process, subject to approval by City of Rancho Cucamonga. Product: 15 copies of a memorandum on scoping issues. Purpose. To prepare a comprehensive and legally defensible EIR for the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the update of their General Plan. Approach. Prepare project description section of the EIR, based on information provided during project initiation, to include the following: Regional and local setting. History of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. General Plan Update objectives. Updated General Plan characteristics, including any discretionary actions required by City of Rancho Cucamonga, and important plan features. Intended uses of the EIR (as required by Section 15124(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines), including a list of responsible and other agencies expected to use the EfR in decision-making, and a list of approvals for which the EIR will be used. · Describe effects found not to be significant, in accordance with Section 15128 of the State CEQA Guidelines, by listing them with brief explanations of why they are not significant, or by referral to the Initial Study. Document baseline conditions, conduct impact evaluations, and formulate mitigation measures~ Specific topical areas to be addressed, the general approach to be used, and the known issues to be confronted in each section are described below. Growth-inducing and cumulative impacts will be comprehensively evaluated separately in the EIR. ~-,, Hydrology/Water Quality. Impacts of the proposed plan Pa,~e 43 Program O0 oO update on surface runoff, flooding, the increase in impermeable surface area, groundwater recharge, and other aspects of the local hydrologic cycle will be evaluated, as applicable, based on technical information provided by the City and other available sources. Hazard from the 100-year flood will be described. Water quality issues will be analyzed to the extent that they are affected by the proposed General Plan update. Mitigation measures for hydrology (e.g., flooding) and water quality impacts will be recommended, if needed. Land Use, Applicable Plans, and Policies. Existing land uses within the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be identified from existing information provided by the city including available aerial photography. An existing land use map will be presented in the EIR. The EIR will evaluate proposed new land uses identified in the updated General Plan in relation to current land uses and the City of Rancho Cucamonga policies; it will address the compatibility of these uses. Impacts on existing and potential future land uses in the project vicinity will be assessed for both the construction (short- term) and operations (long-term) phases. Density, interrelationship of uses, and environmental impacts will also be addressed from a land use impact perspective. Measures will be recommended to reduce or eliminate adverse land use effects. $ocioeconomics. A summary of existing and projected population, employment, and housing figures will be presented, based on available data. The EIR will describe the anticipated direct and secondary population, employment and housing effects that are expected during the planning period of the General Plan update. Measures to mitigate significant adverse effects will be suggested. Public Services, Facilities, and Utilities. MBA staff will coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff a. nd affected public service and utility purveyors to .assess potential impacts of planned growth identified in the General Plan update. The following services, facilities, and utility systems will be analyzed: Electricity Natural Gas Water Supply o Sewer/Wastewater · Solid Waste Disposal · Fire Protection Page 44 Pr~!/~osa/: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. IVo.rk Program Police Protection Schools Parks/Recreation Public Facilities Letters describing the proposed changes and areas identified for growth will be sent to all service and utility agencies. Answers will be requested, as appropriate, to document existing and planned facilities' current and planned usages, and excess capacities. The additional capacity required to meet projected needs will be described. Anticipated impacts will be assessed, and appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended. Aesthetics/Visual Resources. The potential impacts from implementation of the updated General Plan will be evaluated through the use of ground-level photographs from sensitive viewpoints within the City. ~mpac:ts will be assessed in terms of visibility of proposed new projects, alteration of the visual setting, and sensitivity of viewpoints. Any potential aesthetic impacts associated with the 1-30 Freeway will be identified and discussed. Mitigation measures will be recommended, if necessary, to reduce any significant impacts. Hazardous Materials Compliance. Past land uses will be assessed for potential use, storage, and disposal of toxic and hazardous wastes or materials. Historical uses will be documented for the periods for which data are available. Sources of information to be researched will inciud.e historical land use maps, zoning maps, local history references, aerial photographs, and public records available onsite and in the vicinity. Available public records will a[so be researched for documentation of past and current areas of contamination within the City limits. Local and/or state planning, building, and environmental health agencies will be consulted by MBA in the investigation of past uses and past or current hazardous materials incidents potentially affecting City properties. Local and/or state agency personnel responsible for hazardous wastes and materials management, environmental health, and groundwater quality will be consulted regarding the potential presence of hazardous materials or wastes on or near each property. A reconnaissance visit will be conducted at each site to search for visible evidence of hazardous wastes or materials. A site assessment report will be prepared, documenting historical land uses; findings from research, agency consultations, and site reconnaissance; an opinion on the likelihood of the presence of hazardous materials; and, if needed,. recommendations for further testing and The Planning Center Page 45 3. P(/ork Program Page 46 analyses or other stipulations for the proposed project development. All sources and officials consulted in the investigations will be referenced. An appropriate statement regarding the limitations of the assessment will be included in the report. This report will be incorporated into the EIR. Discuss alI significant unavoidable adverse impacts, in conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126(b). Included in the discussion will be any impacts that can be partially mitigated, but not to a level that is less than significant. Any mitigation measures considered, but eliminated from suggestion because of new impacts that would be associated with their implementation, will also be discussed Due to the long-term buildout of the components of the updated General Plan, the cumulative analysis will be based on a summary of the City's growth projections that will be contained within the City's updated General Plan as well as other related planning documents. The cumulative analysis will vary depending on the environmental issue that is addressed Cumulative air quality impacts will be based on the South Coast Air Basin while cumulative aesthetic and glare impacts will be based on proposed local development areas as well as relevant policies. Pursuant to Section 15126(g) of the State CEQA Guidelines, discuss in the EIR any potential growth-inducing impacts of the proposed project. Potential sources of growth inducement and their corresponding impacts, such as removal of obstacles to growth, major new employment generation, or major economic influences, will be qualitatively analyzed, to the extent that they are applicable. Prepare the alternatives section of the EIR based on directives from City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. MBA will work closely with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff to develop a reasonable range of alternatives. MBA will address up to four alternatives to the proposed project. These alternatives will include the no-project alternative as wel~ as selected alternative developed during the update of the General Plan. The alternatives will be presented in sufficient c~etail for comparison with the proposed project. Each alternative will be evaluated with respect to each key impact category reviewed for the proposed project. During the course of environmental analysis, minor variations to the proposed project that could have the effect of reducing or elirninating environmental concerns may become apparent; these variations will be evaluated and documented. Graphic exhibits of alternatives will be presented, if available. Discuss, as required by the State CEQA Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and ProposaL' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/E1R k l 7or Program The Planning Center the reasons for rejecting or recommending it. The environmentally superior alternative will be identified. A summary of the alternatives and their associated impacts will be provided in the EIR summary. Prepare a summary, presenting the significant conclusions of the EIR for the General Plan update, in a manner that is easily understood by the public. A summary "table" format will be used to identify the significant impacts and the effectiveness of the recom-mended mitigation measures. A summary of the alternatives analyses will also be presented, as will issues still to be resolved and issues subject to potential controversy. Prepare other CEQA-mandated sections of the EIR as foIIows: Table of Contents. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources. Effects Found Not to Be Significant. List of,Organizations and Persons Consulted. Preparers of the Environmental Document. Refereeices. Appendices. Conduct quality assurance review of the document for compliance with CEQA and the City of Rancho Cucamonga guidelines and consistency with the General Plan update. ~, Biological Resources. Rancho Cucamonga lies in an ecotone between two major groupings of plan communities, the desert mountian plan communities and coastal communities. As a result there is a diverse array of plant and animal speciies found in seven different plant communities identified in the foothills and upland areas north of the City. Existing documentation pertinent to the biological resources within the City of Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence, including these foothills and upland areas will be compiled, reviewed, and analyzed. This will include a review of (1) general biological habitats in the area and their species compositions, especially the large database gathered by professors and students at nearby Chaffey College (2) the presence of sensitive habitats, (three) the presence or potential presence of sensitive or listed species (e.g. San Bernardino K-rat, California !:.]natcatcher, and the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly) and (4) the potential for regulatory requirement. The potential presence of any plant or wildlife species or habitat considered rare, endangered, threatened, sensitive, or otherwise unique by government agencies (e.g., California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG] Page 4 7 3. l ork Program Page 48 or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]) or recognized conservation organizations (e.g., California Native Plant Society, Audubon Society, or California Natural Diversity Data Base [CNDDB]) will be determined. Wetlands and riparian areas within proposed project boundaries, including a unique sage marsh area located at confluence of Day Creek and East Etiwanda Canyon, will be identified and generally mapped, in accordance with CEQA requirements. (This does not represent a wetland delineation pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Chapter 1600 of the CDFG Code.) Habitat linkages (wildlife and riparian corridors) will also be identified and addressed as sensiti've resources. General biological habitats and both known and potential sensitive biological resources will be mapped with the aid of 200-scale (1 inch equals 200 feet) topographic maps and aerial photographs. A list of flora and fauna within the City boundaries will be prepared, including indications of abundance, habitat, and notation of whether native or introduced species. All potentially significant direct and indirect impacts (adverse and beneficial) on biological resources posed by the proposed growth or land use initiatives in the updated General Plan will be assessed. Proposed habitat removal will be quantified by habitat type. Feasible mitigation measures available to minimize or eliminate the potential adverse impacts of the proposed project on biological resources will be recommended. Emphasis will be placed on providing maximum attainable compatibility between land use development and protection of biological resources. Unavoidable adverse impacts will be enumerated. This scope of work does not include regulatory compliance, such as ACOE Clean Water Act Section .404 permits, CDFG Section 1600 agreements or USFWS Section 7 consultations. Focused surveys for sensitive species are also not included. The need for regulatory compliance, focused surveys or other services may be determined during the course of the proposed scope of work, if appropriate. These services are available, if needed, subject to amendments to the scope and budget, with prior client approval. Cultural Resources. The historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources within the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be analyzed. These technical analyses will involve a literature search, surface reconnaissance of recorded sites, consultation with local information repositories, and report preparation. The report will include impact assessments and proposed mitigation measures for any impacts on known cultural or scientific resources in the area. If subsurface surveys or other Prq~o~al.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. l 7or Program Task 5.3 Draft EIR Task 5.4 Response to Comments The Planning Center focused investigations are determined to be needed, MBA will advise the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These services are available, subject to amendments to the scope and budget, with prior client approval. The historical evaluation will include an assessment of Rancho Cucamonga's historic citrus and vine producing landmarks including the original Rancho Cucamonga, the railroads which played an important part in the City's history, and the more than other 30 recognized historic sites located throughout the City. The incorporated area of Rancho Cucamonga comprises three older communities: Alta Loma, Eftwanda and Cucamonga. The first residents of the Rancho Cucamonga area were the Chuilla and Serrano Indians. The remains of one of their villages have been found in Alta Loma. However, most of the significant cultural resources found within the Rancho Cucamonga area related to historic times. There are over 30historic landmarks within the City's sphere of influence. These sites and general procedures for their protection are documented in the existing general plan. In the 20 years since the general plan was written considerable changed in management procedures for historic resources, this element of the general plan is expected to be substantially. Product: 15 copies of the complete screencheck draft EIR Purpose. To respond to the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff comments on the screencheck draft EIR, complete necessary revisions, and publish the draft EIR for public review. Approach Coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's project coordinator who will assemble comments on, and suggested revisions to, the screencheck draft EIR. One set of unified comments will be provided to MBA. · Complete revisions to the screencheck draft EIR, pursuant to review comments. Revisions will be prepared in conformance with the scope of work. Prepare and reproduce the draft EIR for submittal to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for its distribution to the public. Product: 100 copies of the draft EIR Purpose. To prepare a screencheck final EIR, with written responses to comments received on the draft EIR that raise significant environmental issues; and to submit them for the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff review after the close of the public comment period. Approach. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's project coordinator will compile and transmit to MBA all written comments on the Page 49 3. IVork Program Task 5.5 Final EIR Task 5.5.1 Attendance at Public Meetings and Hearings draft EIR. · MBA will confer with the City's staff to review written comments on the draft EIR and comments from public meetings and hearings to develop a general framework and strategies for preparation of responses. The format of the final EIR will be as an attachment of Responses to Comments to the text of the draft EtR. Revisions of the draft EIR text and reprinting of it as part of the final EIR are assumed to be unnecessary. Submit the screencheck final EIR with draft responses to comments for the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff review. Product: 15 copies of the screencheck final EIR Purpose. To prepare a final EIR that contains a list of commentors, comment lette.rs, and Responses to Comments. Approach. Coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's project coordinator, who will assemble comments on, and suggested revisions to, the screencheck final EIR. One set of unified comments will be provided to MBA. · Based on staff comments, complete revisions to the Res13o.nses to Comments. Assemble and reproduce the final EIR for for distribution by the City to the public. Product: 50 copies of the final EIR, as an addendum to the draft EIR. Purpose. To be present at public meetings and hearings, to clevelop an understanding of the public's comments and concerns, to be available to answer questions on environmental issues, and to make presentations on the EIRs. Approach, · Attend a maximum of 6 public hearings or expend up to 24 hours of time (by the Principal-in-Charge and/or the Project Manager), whichever occurs first. Such meetings could include scoping meetings, public workshops, and hearings on the draft and final EIRs. · Conduct presentations, as required, regarding the EIR process and findings, and be available to answer questions that may arise at public hearings or meetings. Prepare presentation graphics and handout materials regarding the EIR process and findings, if needed. Meeting graphics depicting the project and other project description materials are assumed to be provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga or The Planning Center. Product: Attendance at up to 6 public meetings and hearings Page 50 Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/ElR 3. Work Pro.gram Task 5.5.2 Preparation of CEQA Notices Task 5.5.3 Project Management, General Coordination, and Meetings Task 5.5.4 Written Findings Required by Sections 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines Purpose. To prepare all CEQA-required notices in compliance with state legislation and guidelines. Approach. · MBA will prepare the notice of preparation (NOP), the notice of completion (NOC), and the notice of determination (NOD), in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines. Submit the draft notices for City review and revise them, based on staff comments. Submit final notices for distribution by the City. Products: 15 copies of the draft NOP, NOC, and NOD. One (1) reproducible master and 100 copies of the final NOP, NOC, and NOD. Purpose. To manage the EIR preparation effort and to maintain close communication between City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and Planning Center Team members. This task is also intended to ensure that the project is running on time and within budget, and is technically correct and legally defensible. Approach. Attend project coordination meetings with the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff and the Planning Center. The proposed scope of work includes attendance at a maximum of 10 project meetings by up to two staff members during the preparation of the EIR. Product: Attendance at up to 10 project meetings Purpose. To prepare the written findings for each significant effect identified in the EIR, pursuant to Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 21081 of CEQA), and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, pursuant to Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Approach. · MBA will prepare draft findings for each significant effect identified in the EIR and prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations, if unavoidable significant impacts occur. As required by the State CEQA Guidelines, one of three findings must be made for each significant effect and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The Statement of Overriding Considerations will rely on input from the City regarding the benefits of the General Plan update. · MBA project team leaders will consult with the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff to review draft findings and to finalize them. · Submit final Section 15091 findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations to City of Rancho Cucamonga, for adoption. Products: 50 copies of the draft findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Planning Center Page 51 3. Work Program Task 5.6 Mitigation Monitoring Program PART6 FISCAL IMPACT REPORT Task 6.1 Preparation One (1) finalized, camera-ready master of findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Purpose. "To prepare a mitigation monitoring program (MMP) in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 for adoption at the time of the CEQA findings. Approach., MB^ will prepare a draft MMP concurrently with the preparation of the final EIR's Responses to Comments. The MMP will be designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation requirements during project implementation. In coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, MBA will prepare the MMP for mitigation measures that address significant impacts or are adopted as conditions of approval. · The program will be designed to fit into the City of Rancho Cucamonga's existing entitlement and project review process. The MMP is proposed to include the following components: Introduction and Purpose of the Program, Roles and Responsibilities, Monitoring and Reporting Procedures, and Master Mitigation Matrix. MB^ will coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff to refine MMP content and format, prior to preparing the draft MMP. After review and comment on the draft MMP, MBA will revise the MMP, according to the comments provided, and will submit the final MMP. Products: 15 copies of the draft MMP. 50 copies of the final MMP. The Fiscal Impact Report will include the following tasks: . Municipal Revenues. Based on current budget analysis and interviews with key financial staff, factors will be developed to estimate the various revenue sources for the General Plan land uses. This will include: property taxes to the City and the Redevelopment Agency, retail and non-retail sales taxes, trar, sient lodging taxes, franchises, business license and utility users taxes, vehicle code fines, motor vehicle in- lieu taxes, State gasoline taxes, investment income, current fees and charges and other revenues as identified. o Municipal Costs. Again, based on current budget analysis and interviews with key departmental staff, factors will be developed to estimate the various City services. A key issue will be to establish the long range planning level of service based on current practices and anticipated changes, particularly regarding the fire district and parks and recreation services. The services will include: general government and administration, police and fire - which is Page 52 Proposah Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. }Vor Program Task 6.2 Staff Review Task 6.3 Revisions/Final Document PART 7 GENERAL PLAN ADOPTION PROCESS Task 7.1 GPTAC Review Task 7.2 Task Force Review provided through a subsidiary district controlled by the City, libraries, parks and recreation, public works covering streets, storm drains and trees and landscaping, planning and other community development services, specialized facilities such as the sports arena and other services as identified. · Fiscal Impact Analysis. The consultants fiscal model will be calibrated to prepare projected revenues and costs resulting from General Plan land uses at build-out for the City's General Fund. The analysis will present projected surpluses or deficits as well as revenue/cost ratios. Property tax increment to the Redevelopment Agency will be presented separately. Also, the fiscal analysis will examine the relationship between land uses and their respective revenue and cost generation. This information will be useful in guiding selected Economic Development policies. · Fiscal Sensitivity Analysis. This analysis will examine the sensitivity of the projected fiscal impacts to several selected key assumptions. For example, changes in retail or industrial zoning would influence retail sales and job projections; also, if the northern sphere of influence area has changes in development potential due to habitat preservation or annexation policy issues, this would influence both residential and non-residential growth projections. A draft fiscal impact report would be submitted to the City for their staff review along with documentation of all data and assumptions. The review comments would be reviewed and discussed with City staff. The draft report will be revised and a final fiscal impact report will be prepared and submitted including all data and assumptions. Key fiscal issues will be highlighted, particularly as they would influence Economic Development policies. Product: Draft and Final Fiscal Impact Report The City has done welt to have already established a coordination group at the technical level. As part of the final adoption process, we will seek a consolidated commentary from the GPTAC as input to a final revision to produce the hearing draft documents. The GPTAC will have been involved at key points throughout the process, so this will be an opportunity for the members to make any final observations that should be folded into the General Plan. Particular focus should be placed on the Implementation Action Plan. The General Plan Task Force provides a policy overview in parallel with the GPTAC's technical oversight. This final opportunity for review and comment will enable the Task Force to make any final consolidated comments for inclusion with the staff report on the General Plan and EIR. The Planning Center Page 53 3. lVork Program Task 7.3 Planning Commission Public Hearings Task 7.4 City Council Public Hearings PART8 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Task 8.1 Staff/Consultant Coordination Meetings Task 8.2 Intergovernmental Coordination Task 8.3 Project Management 'The consultant will participate in two Planning Commission public hearings within the scope of this work program. Additional hearings, if required, will be negotiated on a time and materials basis. 'The consultant will participate in two City Council public hearings within the scope of this work program. Additional hearings, if required, will be negotiated on a time and materials basis. The consultant will be prepared to make presentations at all four anticipate public hearings, as well as to answer questions that may arise during the hearing process. We propose to schedule staff/consultant coordination meetings at key milestones in the project, not at regularly spaced intervals. The reason is to make these meetings as "product focused" as possible and time them so the direction resulting from each meeting has immediate product impacts, particularly prior to scheduled workshops or hearings. We believe that 6 such meetings will be the most cost-efficient: number within the 14-month project schedule envisioned by the City. To the maximum extent possible, we propose to schedule the Staff/Consultant coordination meetings on the same day as the GPTAC meetings, perhaps on a morning/afternoon basis, respectively. We envision up to 4 GPTAC meetings during the course of the project. Some of the staff/consultant coordination meetings may require attendance by other department representatives to focus on specific issues for a portion of the agenda. The focus of staff/consultant coordination meetings is to manage the update process and clarify substantive policy issues. The focus of the GPTAC meetings is to hone the substantive content of the Plan from a technical standpoint and to shape the Implementation Action Plan. Each member of the consultant team will be responsible for coordination with appropriate agencies. The team was carefully selected to include firms and individuals who already have or can readily establish communication with the appropriate governmental offices~ They know exactly what they need to find out and how it needs to be folded into the project. A procedure will be established whereby a "'heads-up" report will be shared quickly among the consultant team and with the City's project manager if anything resulting from intergovernmental coordination signals a concern that may require a coordinated strategy or City initiative. The consultant's Project Manager and Assistant Project Manager are accustomed to working as a team, often in a Co-Manager arrangemenL They will generally follow a similar approach on this project, but with AI Bell playing a more dominant role with the policy levet interaction arid Karen Gulley focusing generally on the technical ~e,vel coordination. However, the purpose in having two essentially co-equal project managers is to enable either one to substitute for the other in the case of illness, absence, or Page 54 Pro#osal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. Work Program PART9 SPECIAL STUDIES / OPTIONS Task 9.1 Coordinate Special Studies and Integrate Into the General Plan unavoidable time conflicts. The team will operate under a computer protocol mutually acceptable to the City and consultants. The consultant's computer system is Year 2000 compliant. A complete communications protocol will be established to facilitate file sharing and transfer of data by electronic means. Products will be designed so that they can be turned over to the City in a form compatible with their computer systems. For information that we wish to make available to the public, we propose to add that material to the City's Web Site, with instructions regarding how the citizenry can respond and otherwise become involved in the update process. Early attention will be given to establishing a working outline for the General Plan and E~R, including guidance on: ^ standard text format and writing style; · Use of figures, maps and graphics; · Color coordination; · Implementation action plan format; and · Other standardization specifications so that work in progress can be efficiently folded into the document system. The number of team members and City departments involved in this project demands a system for creating the General Plan as we go, without having to backtrack as the project unfolds. The schedule is simply too tight to allow format and syntax confusion to get in our way. Therefore, clear guidance regarding the nature of the final product is required early in the project. We have not budgeted in this proposal for administrative services such as public notices, establishing and maintaining mailing lists, postage, etc. We do include preparation of agendas for meetings in which we participate, recognizing that finalizing any agenda will require close coordination with and input from City staff. Our approach on this issue is that the City can handle these aspects of the process more efficiently and that consultant time would be more cost effectively devoted to technical aspects of the Plan. However, as noted elsewhere, we are open to negotiation on this and other refinements to the work program. The Planning Center will coordinate the work of our consultants as they complete the Special Studies described below, should they be authorized by the City. The policies, plans and recommendations from the special service studies that are relevant to the General Plan will be integrated into the appropriate elements. Refer to Tasks 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 for further discussion about the integration of these studies. The Planning Center Page 55 3. l ork Program Task 9.1.1 Foothill Fire Defense Study Update Page 56 The City has elected to update the City's 1987 Fire Defense Study as part of the overall work program. Hunt Research Corporation, which prepared the 1987 study, will conduct the update as a sub- consultant to The Planning Center. This study will include all of the tasks itemized in the February 3, 1999 memorandum from Chief Michael of the Fire Protection District to Brad Buller. The scope will include the following tasks: Historical Emergency Response Analysis. Analyze historical emergency response and incident data for the past 5 years. (Data summaries to be provided by the Fire Protection District) · Response Time Analysis. Determine average response times for emergency vehicle response. (Fire District to provide data for the past year) · Level of Service Analysis. Analyze current level of service and standards of coverage and make recommendation as to Risk Based standards of cover and levels of service. Identify the. application ability of the first alarm units and thereby the level of protected risk. · Compliance Analysis. Review current fire protection system for compliance with ISO standards, recommendations from the Fire Commission on Accreditation, recent OSHA mandates, NFPA standards, and current state of the are in the Fire Service. · Evaluation Benchmarks. Create benchmarks for evaluation of the delivery system. Fire Station Location Study. Review growth projections and review current and proposed fire station locations. Make recommendations for additional stations (if any), modifications or relocations, if appropriate. Update 1987 Fire Defense Study. Review the 1987 study by Hunt: Research Corporation and recommend modifications/additions/updates to the goals, objectives and programs. · Apparatus/Equipment. Review apparatus and equipment and make recommendations as to types of apparatus, additional apparatus, replacement schedules, etc. Code Review. Review all codes and ordinances and make recommendations. Review the process for conditioning of new development to assure adequate fire protection requirements. · Program Review. Review all department programs for compliance with the programs defined in Task 8 of this scope, and make recommendations for improvement, deletion or addit:ions. Starbrig Analysis. Review staffing of all components of the Fire District for workloads, adequacy, organizational Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/ElR 3. Work Program Products: improvements, expansion, staff configurations, etc., and make recommendations. Provide criteria and benchmarks for determining staffing levels. · Revenue Enhancement. Review revenue enhancement programs and make recommendations for funding and implementation of programs. · Management Information Analysis. Review existing information management system and the emergency alarm receipt and dispatch and make recommendations. · Interjurisdictional Cooperation. Explore opportunities for functional consolidation or sharing of resources with other agencies. · Strategic Plan. Create a 5-year strategic plan for the Fire District based on the findings and conclusions from Tasks 1-1 5 Produce an updated Foothill Fire Defense Study Task 9.1.2 Public Library Master Plan Update The Public Library Master Plan update will be prepared by Thirtieth Street Architect and will include the following tasks: · Review Master Plan dated September 5, 1991. · Meet with staff to discuss accuracy of previous demographics for current and future needs. Identify and update demographic items found inaccurate. · Review uncompleted Priorities identified in the 1991 report. Meet with "Library Task Force", to be assembled by Staff. 'Task Force may be drawn from Library staff, elected and appointed officials, other City Department staff and members of the public. · Conduct individual interviews with up to 20 individuals in (elected, appointed, City staff, library users, general public) who are familiar with the needs of the community for library servi.ces. · It appears the updated demographics and the interviews will result in a re-evaluation of the Branch Library system versus a Main Library only system. Prepare draft and final report regarding the process and findings of the 1991 Library Master Plan review. · Upon approval of the report, prepare new Master Plan for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, generally following the previous format, including library needs, funding and implernentation strategies and timing. · Optional services: · Conduct complete new surveys a larger sampling of Library staff, elected and appointed officials, other City Department The Planning Center Page 5 7 3. Work Program staff and members of the public. · Prepare conceptual space planning, floor plans, exterior elevations and conceptual level statement of probable cost. Products: Produce an updated Library Master Plan Task 9.1.3 Recreation Needs and System Recommendations Study Purkiss Rose-RSl will conduct the recreation analysis and planning, which will involve the following tasks: PHASE 1. RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS The goal of this phase is to develop a credible data base and perform a thorough analysis that will support any policy statements. Project Definition and Orientation Purkiss Rose-RSI will meet with the consultant team and City staff to discuss potential issues, develop a list of contacts, review the status and material in the existing General Plan and acquire past relevant studies and finalize the project schedule. The consultant will seek an understanding of staff s perceptions of the community's recreational needs, the arrangement with any shared facilities, of the relationship with the School District, of the current and future budgets and policy objectives. Review recreation trails objectives. Research and Fact Finding Inventory of Existing Recreation Facilities · Purkiss Rose-RSI staff will tour existing parks and recreation facilities owned and/or operated by the City and other government entities and review current programming practices. This review would include (but not be limited to) existing facilities, public school facilities, County recreation areas (if any). We shall review the existing trail system. The consultants will verify the inventory of all existing and proposed recreation facilities and programs operated by non-profit and for-profit concerns located within the City and adjacent communities. We will review all new facilities, specific plans and any new proposed parks and trail facilities. This review would include (but not be limited to) such team sports sponsored by church and charity groups as Little League, Pop Warner and AY$O, youth groups such as scouting, adult sports organization such as tavern softball leagues, community volleyball and basketball, YMCAs and YWCAS, and commercial establishments such as health clubs, ice and roller skating rinks, bowling alleys, karate clubs, dance studios, and golf courses. · The consultants will identify facilities provided outside of the Page 58 ProposaL' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR Program City, which serves local residents. Conversely, the consultants will also determine which City facilities are serving outside residents. · The consultants will question personnel from organizations and at workshops to obtain attendance and membership figures and profile participants (e.g., age, residence, length of involvement). · The consultants will list available and unavailable recreation services and facilities. Any gaps in the recreation menu identified will receive special attention during the demand analysis. Available Land Inventory and Analysis The consultants will gain information from the general plan study, city and county of availability of land in the area. Once the survey of recreation needs is updated, service radius for existing park studies and acreage per 1000 defined, we can better understand any land deficiencies and their locations. This information will be utilized in the planning and implementation phase of the Master Plan. The priorities for land acquisition will also become an element in the Plan for the City. Demand/Needs Analysis The purpose of needs analysis in relationship to parks and recreation planning is essentially to define demand in terms of participation in recreation activities by the residents of the City and the number and type of facilities and programs required to meet these demands. Demographic Analysis and Projections The Consultants will review and analyze existing data from the City, school enrollment figures, the County, the California State Department of finance, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and census data as available from one of several summary type processing centers such as National Decision Systems, Inc. In addition, the Consultants will interview the City Planning Department and major developers with commitments to development within the service area to define the extent and timing of future population growth. Community Workshops Optional, see Task 9.2.1. The Planning Center PHASE II PLANNING Program and Use Activities Development Plan The Consultant Team shall review activities specifically related to parks and recreational resources within the City. Program development will be defined in terms of community need, physical Pa~;e 5 9 3. lVork Program space/facility requirements, location, operating requirements and cost. Those programs, which may be conducted through concession agreements or private operations, will also be defined. A schedule of program use activities will be prepared. The schedule of program descriptions and private service programs will be organized irrto the master program development plan. The program date will be a vital resource for determining physical space requirements for facilities, development and acquisition. Park and Facility Standards The detailed park standards as described in the current Plan will be reviewed in light of data obtained from several sources: · Using methodologies developed in prior planning efforts and extensive surveys conducted in various areas in Southern California, the Consultants will develop recreation participation rates for the City, based upon the demographic make-up of the population living within the City. These rates will be translated into facilities demand factors for each kind of major recreation activity. The number of facilities required to meet the level of participation within the City will be expressed in terms of a standard related to the population base supporting a given facility. For example, the total number of participation days for softball will be established, and will then be translated into demand for physical facilities based on peak day design standards. The number of facilities required as it relates to the population base will be expressed as: One softball field per X thousand population.. In the course of preparing other park master plans, the Consultants have inventorled facilities in a large number of cities throughout Southern California and related the number of existing facilities to the population base. These data will also be used to establish a "top-down" range of facility standards. All of these data including the input from the survey will be used to evaluate and adjust, if necessary, the facility standards contained in the existing Master Plan. These standards will then be used to determine current and projected facilifies' needs within the City as a whole and by sub-area or service area. These estimates and projections of facilities' needs will be used by the Consultants to determine the amount and location of developed park land which will match the community's demand levels. Recreation Trails System Based on evaluation criteria developed in Phase I and on the demand anatysis and needs statement, we will review the Plan that identifies trail locations with feeder connections, widths, paving, trail heads, and basic design concepts for an overall multi-use trails system. The system will include evaluation of trails to proposed Page 60 Proposal.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 3. Work Program acquisition. Opportunities and constraints will be reviewed. Proposed linkages will be presented as a part of this study. Screen Check Preparation of screen check of the existing Master Parks and Recreation Plan, additions, programs and appropriate elements. Task 9.2 Optional Studies Task 9.2.1 Public Outreach Workshops Task 9.2.2 Public Opinion Survey Task 9.2.3 Hazardous Materials Management The following Optional Studies will be completed should the City choose to fund them. Should the City select this optional study, The Planning Center will conduct a workshop with City service providers, and then conduct three pubic workshops. The focus of this series of meetings will be an orientation to the update project and its purpose; sharing and obtaining commentary on a preliminary vision statement; obtaining input on an initial set of policy option papers; and commenting on the draft plan. The purpose will be to give the public special opportunities to comment on issues and concerns they consider important. As discussed in Section 2 of this proposal, we intend to adapt as much of the Future Search process into this program as we can. While not as powerful as a full Future Search conference would be, it will enable us to use the process to not only support the General Plan update, but help build community support for it as well. It may be that one or more Future Search initiatives will be stimulated by this process~ The Consultants will conduct a statistically valid, random phone survey of residents to obtain information regarding park and recreation needs and other General Plan related issues. The survey is anticipated to incorporate 60 questions and be conducted in 13 minutes. 300 interviews will be conducted. This survey will be designed to determine current and projected needs for facilities such as ball fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, meeting rooms, and recreation programs. The recreation needs information from the survey will be used as input to the recreation roles matrix analysis update. Issues of public safety, library services, and similar areas may be addressed as well. Information about the public's perception of the City identity and design quality will inform the Community Design portion of the Plan. The City of Cucamonga is primarily a residential community, with most of the commercial and light industrial businesses concentrated along a few streets. Hazardous materials are likely to be used or generated at many of these commercial and light industrial facilities, including gas stations, dry cleaners, and photographic development stores. In addition, small amounts of hazardous materials are used in households. Proper use and disposal of these substances, including encouraging the use of non-toxic alternatives, can reduce the potential for increasing contamination of our natural resources. Extremely hazardous materials are probably transported through The Planning Center Page 61 3. Work Program City limits both by truck and rail. We will inventory the users of hazardous and extremely hazardous materials, assess their locations relative to the critical facilities in the City, and describe mitigation measures that can be used to reduce the hazard posed by the unauthorized release of these substances. Task 9.2.4 Water, Sewer, Electrical Facilities Analysis Within the Community Development super-element, the City may elect to include sections on the provision of water, sewer, and electrical services within the Study Area. This task would involve research and data analysis, impact analysis, and policy formulation. Engineering Resources would gather existing master plans, studies, reports, and maps providing information on system composition, sources of supply, systems operation, and future improvements. The data wil~l be cataloged, reviewed and analyzed to establish a baseline condition for existing water, sewer, and electrical systems. Operational efficiency and availability of adequate supply will be documented. Considering the baseline condition, the impact of the proposed Land Use Plan will be evaluated in both written and mapped forms. General Plan goals, policies, and implementation actions will be prepared to address the provision of these public facilities. In addition, if' required, we will develop policy guidance on how the City may influence outside agencies responsible for these services. Page 62 Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 4. Schedule The following Schedule diagram is based on a fifteen month schedule beginning in April, 1999 and ending in June, 2000. Two opportunities are programmed for review and adjustment of this draft. The first is during the Project Initiation Workshop in Part 1; the second is during the Update Program Review in Part 3. Minor refinements may occur at other points in the process. Given the scope of this project, the number of consultant firms and City departments involved, and the rather tight schedule envisioned by the City, it will be important to conduct as many tasks in parallel as possible, rather than totally sequential. For example, the community survey work and special studies needed to support the Update can be run in parallel with each other and with other foundation setting tasks. Care will be taken to avoid situations in which tasks have to be held up or substantially revised owing to schedule conflicts. Pre-scheduling major meetings wel~ in advance will also have to be done so that the most efficient use of time can be arranged (such as combining staff/consultant meetings on the same date as other necessary meeting events). It should be noted that the entire drafting of the Updated General Plan and EIR must get us to a "hearing ready" position in just over a year. Making that timetable will require outstanding schedule management and cooperation by all participants. As noted elsewhere, the schedule, scope, and budget are all interrelated and we are open to negotiating changes in them as necessary to achieve an optimum program. The Planning Center Page 63 4. Schedule This page intentionally/eft blank. Page 64 ProposaL' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR '" '"~ .~ 1.3 P~je~ Initiation Works~p -. -....': ; 1 4 B~ ~ng S~em Preparabon ...... '-:~=' . ' .. ' ......... I' ! 2.1 Comm~ Oond~io~ Documentation [ .......... ~ 2.2 Public Participation Program :: 2.3 Community Issues/Opportunity Areas Report, i 3.1 Policy Ol=tions/Opportunity Areas ~ 3.2 Uodate Program Rewew 4.1 Community Profile/General Plan Concept 4.2 Review Profile and Concept 4.3 Updated General Plan Elements 4.3.1 C4~m.m~.~ Develop~me. nt 4k3~ Environmerd:al Resource Ma~nageme~t 4.3.3 Public Health and Safety 4.3.4 {mDlame~aticm Actic~'~ Piar, i JUN ~UL AUG ocr NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR : 8,? Preparation ; 8.2 Staff Review · 8.3 Revisions/Final Document 7,1 GPTAC 7.2 Task Force Review 7.3 Planning Commission Woeshops/Hearings 7, 4 City Council Workshol:~/Hearings A · & & M~Y m i JUL J 8., Staff/Co nsuttant 0oordinatk:)n Meeting, ' I /' I t ' / I ' ' ~ 8.2 Intergovernmental Coordination I m m imm~mmm mm m m m ~m~mmmm m mmmmm~ m m ~ m mmmm~ m m m m, 10onduot Special Studie~ I I 9.2 Conduct Optional Studies ' ........... I ...... J Meetings & Wcxkshol~ ~ Public Hearings ~ Wren Pe~'iodic Coordination ~1~ Optional Publie Workshops .:;~;:~;¢'¢~t~;e "~'~'~E4'~'~' '~'~.. ~-...'~'~'~¢:'-'~"~-"."~ ~"~,.-. '~- ~d:~ ~<~¢'~"'~.~..":~ $;-~r~:; ~ ' ' ' * ~ ' ' ........ i"i ............ :'":'"'!7!:' "'7':=""";' '"'". '"': ................ 77'"'?=:':7":-"'":"- ?T'77-'?:T7 '/:~'~r~-~.?-S::::-.':~%.~:¢.~'.-"4~2:-...-'.~.~, ¢~* -~.~'.~,~.~-~'2.~.~.~:~:i¢~4f.~2:7~¢.~a¢~'~'~?~'~ ,·· ·, ....... , .. , · ......... mmlm{m emro mm~, ~mmmmm ~mmlmmmm~ mmmm i .5. Proposed Budget 5. Proposal Budget INSERT BUDGET TABLE The Planning Center Page 65 5. Proposal Budget blank for now Page 66 Proposal.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR City of Rancho Cz camonga GENERAL PLAN UPDA TE/EIR PROJECT BUDGET NOTE: The budget includes two separate totals. The first is the Total General Plan Update Budget, based on our Work Program, that is needed to complete a comprehensive General Plan Update. This is followed by a cost itemization of the Special Studies requested by the City and additional optional items to be considered by the City Council. Task 1 1Team Orientation Session $1,500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $5,500 Task 12 Preparing for Project Initiation Workshop $6,300 $1,200 $7,500 Task 13 Project Initiation Workshop $1,500 $500 $500 $50E', $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $5,500 Task 1.4 Base Mapping System Preparation $5,000 $20,000 $25,000 Sub-Total Pad I $14,300. $1,000 $1,000 $1,000. $21,000 $1,000 $1,000, $1,000 $2,200 $43,500 · Task 2.1 Community Conditions Documentation $4,500 $4,500 Task 2.2 Public Participation Program $3,000 $3,000 Task 2.3 Community Issues/Opportunity Areas Report $3,400 $3,400 Sub-Total Part 2 $10,900 $10,900 ' ~ Task 3.1 Policy Option/Opportunity Areas $7,890 $1,500 Task 3,2 Update Program Review $1,000 Sub-Total Part 3 $8,890 .. $1,500 Task 4.1 Prepare Community Profile & GP Concept Map $7,500 Task 4.2 Review Community Profile & GP Concept Map $6,160 Task 4.3 Updated General Plan Elements 4.3.1 Community Development $25,000 4.3.2 Environmental Resource Management $t 5,500 4.3.3 Public Health and Safety $11,300 4.3.4 Implementation Action Plan $4,500 Task 4.4 Document Preparation $6,000 $6,500 $52,000: $12,000 $4,000 $9,390 $1,000 $10,390 $7,500 $6,160 $19,250 $7,000 $11,000 $99,500 $15,500 $48,550 $4,500 $6,000 Sub.Total Part4 $75,960 $6,500 $52,000 ~9,250 $7;000 $11,000 $!2,000 $4,000 $187,710 Task 5.1 Initial Study and Notice of Preparation Task 5.2 Screen Check EIR $4,500 Task 5.3 Draft EIR Task 5.4 Response to Comments Task 5.5 Final EIR Task 5.6 Mitigation Monitoring Program Sub-Total Par~.5 $4,500, - ' Task 6.1 Preparation 6.1.1 Municipal Revenues $3,000 6.1.2 Municipal Costs $3,000 6.1.3 Fiscal Impact Analysis $9,700 6.1.4 Fiscal Sensitivity Analysis $2,000 Task 6.2 Staff Review S1,500 $1,000 Task 6.3 Revisions/Final Bocument $2,000 Sub.Total Part 6 $1,50Q' .$20~7~]0 Task 7.1 GPTAC Review (1) Task 7.2 Task Force Review (1) Task 7,3 Planning Commission Public Hearings (2) Task 7.4 City Council Hearings (2) Sub-Total Part 7 ' - ' $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $1,000 $1,000 ~oo szi,mm :~z~ Task 8.1 Staff/Consultant 0oord. Meet;rigs (6} ............ $8,000 Task 8.2 Intergovernmental Coord. $4,000 Task 8.3 Project Management $25,000 Sub-Total'Iliad 8':: '"~i ,,'i'~,.'.: ... i. ~7',,00D Total Project Labor Cost i$159,0~30 Reimbursable Expenses $19,881 Task 9.1 Coordinate Special Studies 9.1.1 Foothill Fire Defense Study 9.1.2 Library Master Plan 9.1.3 Park & Recreation Needs Assessment Task 9.2 Coordinate Optional Studies 9.2.1 Public Outreach Workshops 9.2.2 Public Opinion Survey 9.2.3 Hazardous Materials Anaylsis 9.2.4 Water, Sewer, Electicity Analysis $4,772 $3,181 $12,000 $6,00 2,0oo ..........$500 $5,OOO $5,000 $50,000 $54,500 $8,000 $8,000 $2,700 $2,700 $3,100 $3,100 $1,950 $1,950 $70~60 $75,250 $3,000 $3,000 $9,700 $2,000 $2,5O0 $2,000 . : ' ......... $22,200 $500 $500- $800 $3,800 $500 $800 $3,300 $2,000 $4,000 $2,000 $6,000 , ~J. :;~}~0.. i, ~liOD~ S5,600 $17,100 $1,000 $1,000 $1~000 .. ~:,,',~Q. .~.~r,, :::.,,,.,~'~..'~;'~:$~.k' ~': ~.. $8OOl $5o01 $1550l ,$5~5001 ,$509,1, $5,000 $20,,300 $1 ,oo01 "$,,o0o,I $1,5OOl $25Ol, $4,000 $20,500 $4,000 $5,500 $33,500 · "s9~0. ~ imam& $7,820J $38,301 $47,000 $16,000 $41,850 $20,325 $4,772 $47,000 $16,000 $41,850 $3,181 $12,000 $20,325 $5,000 $20,300 ABBREVIATIONS: TPC = The Planning Center; SRHA = Stanley R. Hoffman & Associates; ECI = Earth ConsultanV~ International; ERSC = Engineering Resources of Southern California; HRC = Hunt Research Corporation; TSA = Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc.; PR = Purkiss Rose; RN = The Research Network; MBA = Michael Brandman Associates NOTES: 1, Total includes $44,000 for CMP traffic study and $8,000 for circulation element assistance. 6. Team Qualifications 6. Team Qualifications THE PLANNING CENTER General Plan/EIR City of Temecula General Plan Update and EIR City of Clovis General Plan Update City of £a Palma The Planning Center The Planning Center has completed the General Plan for the newly incorporated City of Temecula. The General Plan Program included an extensive community outreach program designed to obtain community input at key phases in the Plan's preparation. The community participation program included a series of neighborhood meetings to focus attention on issues at the neighborhood level and a series of citywide public workshops/town hall meetings. In addition to preparing the state mandatory elements, The Planning Center prepared five optional elements: Community Design, Air Quality, Economic Development, Growth Management, and Infrastructure/Services. The General Plan Study Area (60 square miles) included a proposed 24 square mile sphere of influence and 10 mile area of interest. The extensive Study Area involved many issues of significance including the amount and type of economic development, conservation of open space and rural character, phasing of infrastructure, fiscal impacts, and annexation policies. The General Plan also addressed the preservation and enhancement of the historic Old Town Temecula within a rapidly growing s.uburban community. The City of Clovis is a 14,000-acre city located in Fresno County. The Planning Center completed the General Plan and EIR for this forward-thinking city of 180,000 people in Fresno County (buildout in 2030). The work program for the general plan update was a two staged process that extended over a 24-month period. Stage One involved the preparation of a current conditions report and issues papers and the administration of a community-wide survey to identify critical con.ditions and public concerns, as well as help establish the vision for the community. Stage Two involved the developmerit of a master land use plan and the preparation of nine general plan elements (Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, Safety, Public facilities, Air Quality). Additionally, Stage Two involved the preparation of a program level environmental impact report and the public hearing process. The General Plan and EIR reflected the City's desire to look into the future 30 years and more to anticipate transportation and infrastructure needs for this growing region and reserve corridors and conserve resource areas. This is an important plan for the region because of its focus on integrating the efforts of multiple governments on a regional basis. The Planning Center has just completed a comprehensive update to the City' of La Palma's General Plan. The project included all state- mandated elements, optional components covering public facilities and parks and recreation, and an environmental impact report. The project resulted in the first Housing Element for the City to be Certified by the Housing and Community Development Department. The intimate size and social and economic stability of the City allowed for an uncommon approach in writing and structuring the Page 67 (3. Team Qualifications Urban Growth Plan/EIR City of Tracy General Plan Update/EIR City Of Yorba £inda Stanton General Plan Update/EIR City of Stanton STANLEY R. HOFFMAN & ASSOCIATES General Plan. The final document is a concise, focused, and highly personal plan for the community. The goals, policies, and implementing actions flow directly from the vision and values of the community-- family, pride of ownership, opportunity, and security. The Planning Center's reputation for innovative approaches to planning is reflected in its work on the Tracy Urban Growth Plan. The Vision Statement, the foundation of the policy component of the General Plan, was organized into three levels for the City of Tracy. The three tiered approach corresponded to five, ten and twenty-year planning tirne frames. Tiers I and II were are responsive to recognized issues that required immediate attention. Specific solutions were presented for these levels. Tier III focused on long- range community goals. These policies were intended to be flexible so as to accommodate changing community needs and desires. The Planning Center prepared a complete update of the City of Yorba Linda's General Plan. This project also involved extensive environmental analysis and an integrated EIR. The General Plan update program included developing a list of important issues, which will then be utilized to define the most critical items to discuss in the general plan. The City of Yorba Linda is almost "built out," and as such, the General Plan and EIR addressed infill development, redevelopment, annexations and development within the City's sphere of influence. Other issues addressed included fisc:al, economic development, specific plan areas, traffic, noise and safety. The Planning Center used an innovative issues-oriented process to complete a consolidated General Plan and EIR. The approach treated the entire General Plan/EIR as a customized series of issue papers which become the building blocks for the final plan. At the same time, each issue paper is a free-standing policy guide, impact statement and documentation on the City's position on the topic covered. The goal of The Planning Center's effort in Stanton was to produce a usable and concise plan organized around issues and not around the topical categories found in traditional plans. In this way, the City will have a General Plan which leads them directly to desired policy actions and positive change. Fiscal Model and Program County of Riverside A fiscal and market analysis was prepared for the Southwest Area Plan for the County of Riverside. We developed a fiscal impact model that is linked with the County's existing Geographic Information System (GIS). It projects County revenues and costs associated with future development under specific assumptions about land use, phasing and infrastructure requirements and can be applied in annexation studies. Capital fees were projected and cornpared against funding requirements. The model allows for detailed land use inputs and recognizes the fiscal characteristics of maior County funds. (1997 and 1999) Page 68 P,*opo~al: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 6. Team Qu lifi'cations Etiwanda North Specific Plan and University/Crest Section of Etiwanda North County of San Bernardino Fiscal Model and Analysis City of Ternecu/a Fiscal Model Development and Fiscal Analysis of the General Plan City of Fontana General Plan and Fiscal Model Analysis City of Up/and RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Model Update City of Chino General Plan Traffic Model City of Hesperia We prepared a fiscal analysis of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan for the County of San Bernardino to the County General Fund, Road Fund and Flood Control District Zone. The specific plan, as proposed by the landowners consortium, consisted of 6,200 acres of 3,595 housing units, commercial, park and open space land uses phased over the 1994-2010 period. A fiscal analysis on the University/Crest section of the Plan with 1,293 housing units on 403.5 acres was also prepared. (February, 1991) We prepared a fiscal impact model for the City of Temecula. The model analyzed the fiscal impacts of developing the buildout projections of the General Plan, including the sphere of influence areas. The study addressed the fiscal implications of land use policy and phasing assumptions. The copyrighted model was licensed to the City for their ongoing use. We also reviewed and updated several fiscal analyses of other City projects by phasing revenues and costs for each to determine the composite fiscal impact to the City over time. (1995 and 1997) We prepared a fiscal analysis of the General Plan for the City of Fontana. After we developed a fiscal model, we projected the City's general fund revenues and costs and redevelopment tax increments distinguishing between subareas, including North Fontana and the rest of the existing corporate, city and large future annexations. We updated the. model with current budget conditions for the City's ongoing use. (1992 and 1995) We prepared a fiscal model and analyzed the economic and fiscal component:s of the City of Upland's General Plan. The project involved an innovative approach in evaluating retail and employment opportunities, with a fiscal analyses of alternative land use patterns using their geographic information system. The approach included identification of development opportunity areas in this largely built-out City, estimation of overall growth in revenues ~nd the linkage of the fiscal model to the City's parcel database through a geographic information system (GIS). (1995) The development of the Chino Traffic Model (CTM) occurred during 1995. The CTM has been created by RKJK to support the technical analysis of the CMP traffic study projections and local area fee programs, utilizing TRANPLAN software. The CTM was the first San Bernardino County subarea model to be issued a Finding of Consistency from SCAG staff. Estimates of travel demand within the roadway system at buildout of the City of Hesperia were made by RKJK. The development and initial application of the Hesperia Traffic Model (HTM) occurred during 1990, and was updated in 1993. The HTM has been created to support the technical analysis of the City Circulation Element. The HTM utilizes TRANPLAN software. Trip generation and distribution is structured fo~ three trip purposes: home-based work, home-based non-work and non-home based. Trip generation is based on tand use data with residential uses expressed in dwelling The Planning Center Page 69 6. Team Qualifications General Plan Circulation Element and Traffic Model City of Murrieta General Plan Circulation Element and Traffic Model City of/ndio EARTH CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. units and non-residential land uses expressed in acres. Assignment to the roadway network utilizes a multi-increment, capacity-restraint methodol.ogy. The City of Murrieta Circulation Plan was developed by RKJK in response to issues raised and objectives established by the consultant team, City staff, and General Plan Advisory Committee. It is intended to guide the development of a balanced circulation system that will provide adequate capacity to support the travel demands of the land uses included in the land use element while at the same time maintaining an acceptable quality of life for the residents o,f Murrieta. The Murrieta Traffic Model (MTM) was created to provide buildout volurne projections based upon TRANPLAN software. RKJK prepared the Circulation Element Update for the City of Indio General Plan. This included the development of a computerized model for the purpose of forecasting future traffic volumes throughout the City. The Indio Traffic Model (ITM) provides a specialized tool which is used for ongoing analysis of changes to land use and/or roadway network features within the City of Indio. It represents a significant refinement of forecasts developed for the Coachella Valley Area Traffic Study (CVATS). The ITM provides the data base needed to address citywide traffic issues in terms of the orientation of routes and link capacity requirements, and potential citywide fees for circulation improvements, Page 70 Vision Building Project Specific Plan Brea Sphere of Influence Mr. Eldon Gath was selected as the consultant geologist for the Core Team of the City of Brea's Vision Building project. The program team was assembled by the City Planning Department to coordinate and prepare a Specific Plan "vision' for the 7,000-acre Sphere of influence expansion area north of the City of Brea. The Core Team consists of principals from major land development planning firms. Working in close cooperation with City staff, the Core Team held three workshops, wherein invited residents, property owners, developers, and specific guests worked together on a design charette. The Sphere of Influence expansion area is landform-diverse, from steep hillsides, deep valleys, broad rolling hills, to flat alluvial plains. The planning area is traversed by the Whittier fault. Hundreds of landslides mantle the ridgeline slopes. Nearly 1,000 oil wells have been drilled in the study area, and at many localities, tar still seeps from the ground. No flood or debris control devices exist in many of the canyons. Significant thickness' of compacted soils or trash fills exist in many of the canyon headwaters, remnants from the early (Jays of oil exploration. The role of the Core Team was to provide a geologic constraints map for the land planners use in designing the Specific Plan. Participation in the City planning charette was to provide a pragmatic appraisal of concept feasibility based upon geologic Pr~:~t~(/.~a/: Rancho C//camonga General Plan Update/EIR 6. Team Qualifications Technical Background Report and Safety Element C/ty of Desert Hot Springs Geotechnical Constraints Investigation for New Town Planning, Malibu Civic Center Area The Planning Center conditions or construction remediation feasibility. The City of Desert Hot Springs updated its General Plan in 1997. As part of the project, we prepared the Seismic, Geologic and Flooding Hazards Section of the Technical Background Report. To complete the study we conducted an extensive review of the geologic literature available, including many geotechnical studies conducted in-house. The Coachella ValLey segment of the San Andreas fault system extends right through the center of the City, posing a significant surface rupture hazard to many structures, including some of the older water reservoirs in the City. As part of the project, we characterized the strong ground motions expected in different sections of the planning area resulting from a characteristic earthquake on the San Andreas fault and other seismic sources nearby. The mountainous areas to the north and west of the City are locally unstable, locally susceptible to rockfalls, slumping and landsliding. The .arid to semi-add deposits that underlie the valley areas are prone to collapse when saturated. Therefore, special care is required when these areas are developed with a resultant increase in irnigation. Other hazards that were addressed include wind erosion, storm flooding, and earthquake-induced inundation resulting from structural damage to water reservoirs. Many of the reservoirs in the City are of older construction, and have not been seismically retrofitted. As a result of the 1994 Northridge earthquake, structural engineers have developed new construction standards for water tanks, including bracing and baffling. Our report discussed each of these issues extensively, using maps of the planning area to illustrate the most severe hazards identified. Potential mitigation measures to be included in the Safety Element as procjrams and policies were provided. The Malibu Civic Center Association is a confederation of separate prop.edy owners in the "downtown" Malibu area of Malibu Creek, who have formed an association to jointly plan the 200-plus-acre Civic Center area. The Town Center concept for the Malibu Civic Center Area was oi'le that included residential, commercial, municipal, and recreational land uses. The project involved considerable public participation and presentation over a period of five months in the form of community workshops and General Plan Task Force meetings. Eldon Gath was the Principal Geologic Consultant to the Malibu Civic Center Association. The planning was impacted by some severe geotechnical, hydrological, and political factors. The geologic work was focused on the two most severe geotechnical constraints of the site: the potentially active Malibu Coast fault as mapped through the center of the project site; and the liquefaction potential of the site, which lies within the active flood plain of Malibu Creek. Because of shallow 9roundwater, a cone penetrometer (CPT) rig was employed to Page 71 6. Team Qualifications penetrate 55 soundings through the stream and estuarine sediments underlying the site. Correlation of the subsurface sediment profile layers led to the conclusion that the Malibu Coast fault through the Civic Center area had no impact upon the sediments. The results of the fault hazard study were presented to several meetings of the Safety Subcommittee of the Malibu General Plan Task: Force, and results were also used by CGMD in deleting this segment of the Malibu Coast fault from Alquist-Priolo zoning. Nearly the entire Civic Center site is susceptible to seismically- induced liquefaction, however. The CPT investigation's stratigraphic results were supplemented with piezocones to obtain data on the pore-water pressures, Eight borings were also emplaced to retrieve sample cores for CPT correlation and for laboratory testing. The liquefaction potential of the site is quite variable due to the subsurface locations of the ancient channel sands as Malibu Creek migrated across the area and formed its delta. Alternative mitigation solutions were explored, but most mitigation measures require additional site-specific studies. ENGINEERING RESOURCES Sewer Master Plan Update C/~/ of £ontana Utility Underground Feasibility Study Old Town Temecula Page 72 Relevance to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update: The City of Fontana study area is geographically similar to Rancho Cucamonga and, in addition, wastewater disposal is provided the same regional agency; the Inland Empire Utilities Agency. During Phase I, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. prepared computer models and fee calculations and developed a five-year capital improvement plan. Phase two involves the conversion of existing and revised system mapping and databases into a format compatible with the Gt$ currently being developed by the City. In addition to these linkages, a link will be developed which ties the stand-alone sewer model directly to the GI$. Participants', Barry Bierschbach provided project management and technical support during the development of the sewer model and acted as the primary interface between the City and other impacted agencies, David Lawrence provided engineering support during the development of the required computer models. Outcome: Project completion is pending. Duration: The overall project schedule is approximately 12 months. Relevance to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update: Completion of this study required an in depth understand of the existing utility systems. Team members developed lasting relationshi:ps with utility company personnel, which enable the complete understanding of existing utility systems in the study area. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., prepared a study analyzing the potential undergrounding of existing overhead Propo.~,::d: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 6, Team Qualifications Service Area 70, Zone L Water Master Plan Update County of San Bernardino HUNT RESEARCH CORPORATION City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Hesperia City of Manhattan Beach utilities in the area. The study involved a comprehensive field review of existing overhead systems and service connections. This data atong with record drawings obtained from utility companies, provide the basis for a preliminary design of the proposed underground facilities. The proposed design was =presented to the utility purveyors to receive input and ultimately their approval. Participants: Matt Brudin was the primary contact between the utility companies and the City for the duration of the project Outcome: The final report was adopted by the City Council. Duration: Project completion required approximately 8 months. Relevance to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update: Completion of this study required research of existing studies and records to develop a basis for the conversion of an existing water system model, development design guidelines and recommended system improvements. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. researched and evaluated numerous hydraulic models. As a result, we have recommended the use of AH20NET@ as the new standard for the County. Completion of the project required conversion of and calibration of the existing model, alternative analyzes showing locations for new wells, booster stations and storage reservoirs and development of short- and long-term priorities in a five-year capital improvement plan.. Participants: Barry Bierschbach was project manager and provided technical support (luring model conversion and alternative runs. David Lawrence acted as project engineer conducting field research and model development and calibration. Outc:ome: Project completion is pending. Duration: Proiect completion required approximately 8 months. Hunt Research Corporation conducted the original Fire Defense Study for the City in 1987'. The study included analysis and recommendations regarding desired level of service, station locations and equipment needs, organizational and information management, training needs, and revenue enhancement opportunities. Prepared a 5-year Strategic Fire Protection Plan for the City, including station locations, a vegetation management program, fire spread modeling, and urban/wildland interface management. Prepared a comprehensive Strategic Fire Protection Plan for the City, including station locations, response time analysis, and equipment and staffing needs. City of Huntington Beach Prepared a fire station location study, including response time The Planning Center Page 73 6. Team Qualifications THIRTIETH STREET ARCHITECTS, INC. Santee Branch Library City of Santee Route 30 Historical Mitigation PURKISS ROSE. RSI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Comprehensive Master Plan Of Parks And Recreation City Of Temecula Parks And Recreation Master Plan City Of Murrieta Page 74 analysis and equipment and staffing needs. TSA was commissioned to design a new 30,000 s.f. library for the City of Santee. A major step in the design was to complete a needs assessment. The document includes sections on the project background, identification of need, and the vision. Specific needs included size, site, expansion, building configuration, assignable space, staffing, aesthetics, user friendliness, flexibility, supervisory control, and electronic distribution. The basis of the report included review of existing database, City Council interviews, Library Committee direction, Library staff input, public input, review of current trends in the role of libraries in communities, current and future demographics and anticipated demand. The project has progressed to the design of conceptual floor plans, exterior elevations and construction cost estimate. Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. lead a team of designers to analyze and mitigate impacts on seven historic sites along the new route 30. The. project included review and analysis, preparation of design alternatives, conceptual plan, cross Sections/Elevations, computer generated visual simulation, before and after and statement of probable construction cost. The plans are currently being implemented as the new route 30 is being constructed. The newly incorporated City of Temecula, situated in the County of Riverside, needed to consolidate further the City's identity by providing comprehensive parks and recreational guidelines. The City' engaged Purkiss Rose-RSl Landscape Architecture, Recreation & Park Planning to develop the Twenty-Year Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan to act as a manual for future needs. Purkiss Rose-RSl with Chris Coman, Alfred Gobar Associates, conducted two inclusive workshops and a telephone survey to determine citizen needs. The information gathered provided direction that enabled us to proceed with the analysis and eva~uation of needs,, assessment, opportunities and constraints. The firm also devised a Capital Improvements Plan divided into short-term, mid-term and long-term goals to help the City prepare for the next twenty years to meet their needs for park facilities for both the. City and its sphere of influence. Purkiss Rose-RSl, Research Network, Ltd., Chris Coman, Alfred Gobar and Associates, Susan Jones, Leisure Consultant are currently completing the City of Murrieta's Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Financing Strategy. The process involved numerous meetings with the City staff, local user groups, sports groups, senior citizen committees, the school district, the local Historical Society, a telephone survey of the citizens within the City of Murrieta, one town hall meeting and three community workshops. An inventory of existing facilities and assessment of current and Pro~ o,.~al: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EiR 6. Team Qualifi'cations future needs was developed as a part of the Master Planning process. '['he City of Murrieta has an extensive future trail system indicated in the City's General Plan. The consultant team studied the potential trail system, reviewed the proposed trail locations and recommended multi-use trail system connections, which would link the eastern side of the City with the west side. The second draft of the Master Plan was submitted to the City's Parks and Recreation Commission for approval this past October. The Master Plan was presented to the City Council for approval and adoption in January of 1999. MBA Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR and Resource Management Plan County of San Bernardino IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan EIR General Dynamics Corp., Rancho Cucamonga Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Study EIS/EIR, US Army Corps of Engineers, L.A. District, County of San Bernardino Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report Sutter Bay Assoc., Live Oak, County of Sutter The Planning Center The Etiwanda North Specific Plan project was comprised of approximately 6,840 acres, of which approximately 1,155 acres are outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's sphere of influence. Approximately 1,1 O0 acres of the Specific Plan area are privately held parcels within the San Bernardino National Forest. The project was designed to extend the historical, low-density, and neighborhood character of the original Etiwanda community of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will allow for the implementation of 3,613 dwelling units, 28 acres of neighborhood commercial development, public schools, and recreational features, as well as retaining 4, t 12 acres of the site in open space. Areas of concern included biological resources, conversion of open space to planned community uses, traffic and circulation, and compatibility with planned ft.ood control facilities improvements. Clie~t General Dynamics Corporation An EIR and a Specific Plan were prepared for the development of Subarea 18 within the existing Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) area in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed Subarea Specific Plan would provide adaptive commercial and industrial reuse of the three existing buildings onsite; a Metrolink station in the northeast corner of the site; and recreational, commercial, and other multi-use facilities adjacent to a proposed golf course. The Seven Oaks Dam Water Conservation Project was proposed to retain water longer at the dam to allow flows later in the year for goundwater recharge rather than holding the water just long enough to a. llow the peak flow to pass. The primary areas of concern addressed in the ElS included: water, biological, and cultural resources; air and noise quality; land use; recreation; transporta.tion; public health and safety; and energy. The Sutter' Bay Village Specific Plan, an area 1,071 acres in size, is the proposed first phase of development in a 25,000-acre planned community located approximately 15 miles northwest of downtown Sacramento, California. A comprehensive specific plan was dewi!~lope. d 'for the implementation of residential, commercial, business park, and open space uses to provide: opportunities for the integration of current and future electronic and communication technologies into the design of community infrastructure and Padre 75 Q//all_'fi'cations building components; viable and convenient transportation alternatives; which are energy efficient and environmentally superior to traditional automotive vehicles; an extensive network of diverse open space and recreational opportunities for residents and visitors; and, adequate infrastructure and public services to meet growing needs of the community as development occurs. The Specific Plan contained comprehensive design guidelines and development standards that we, re prepared in conjunction with the consulting architect/lar~dscape architect to ensure environmental sensitivity and consistent design quality. Efficient processing and entitlement procedures were .also prepared for subsequent development. An environmental impact report was also prepared concurrently with the Specific Plan, identifying project constraints and providing opportunities for the integration of measures within project design to mitigate potentially significant environmental effects. Critical issues analyzed within the EIR included, among others,: land use compatibility; traffic and circulation; air quality; biology (including several sensitive species); and earth resources. In addition to the preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR, MBA assisted Sutter Bay Associates in the coordination of the project team, including the preparation and maintenance of project scheduling, organ. ization of consultant work efforts, and the administration of project team meetings. Page 76 Pro?,:~.~,:d.' Ran~'ho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 6. Team Q//alifications Pr, ipe City of Temecula General Plan, EIR and Design Guidelines City of Clovis General Plan Update and EIR City of La Palma General Plan Update and EIR City of Tracy Urban Growth Plan, General Plan and EIR City of Yorba Linda General Plan Update and EIR City of Stanton General Plan and EIR T£A~ PRO~CT EXPERIEUCE [Location] C~.tact~eference Temecula, CA Mr. Gary Thornhill Mr. John Meyer City of Temecula 4:3200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 909.694,1989 61ovis, CA Mr. John Wright, Biiector of Planning Dev. Svcs. City of Clovis 1033 Fifth: Street Clovis, CA 93612 209.297.2340 La Palma, CA Ms. Joan Hoesterey Planning Manager City of La Palma 7822 Walker Street La Palma~ CA 90623,-1771 7t4.523.7700 Tracy, CA Mr. Mike Locke City Manager 5;!0 Tracy Boulevarrr Tracy, CA 95376 209.836.2665 Yorba Linda, CA Ms. Patdcia Haley Comm:unity Development Dir. City of Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, CA 92885-8714 714.961.7100 Stanton, CA Mr. Mark Lloyd Planning Manager 78,00 Katefla Avenue. Stanton, CA 90680 714.379.922 City of Santa Fe Springs Heritage Springs Kohl Ranch Specific Plan and EIR Tustin MCAS Specific Plan/Base Reuse Plan Santa Fe ML Robert Orpin Springs, CA Dir. Planning & Development City of Santa Fe Springs 11710 Telegraph Road Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 310.868,0511 Riverside Mr. Keenan 8ehrle County, CA Westminster Capital, inc. 9665 Wilshire Bird, Mezzanine Beverly Hills, CA 90212 310.278.1930 Tustin, CA Ms. Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 714.573.3000 KeyIssues Growth Management Community Design Infill Opportunities Sphere of Influence Regional Infrastructure New Village Development Sphere of Influence/Annexation Preservation of existing quality Appropriate vision for the City Foundation for development code modernization Single map system Significant growth and expansion Public facilities and services Sustained economic development Transportation and circulation Growth Management Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Opportunity Areas Achieving improved quality of development Economic development Improved City image Foundation for development code modernization Truck Traffic Quality Land Use Design Public Amenities Phasing of Development Flexibility in responding to Market · Compatibility with adjacent airport. · Economic Development · Compatibility with surrounding land uses. · Economic Development · Defense Site Reuse The Planning Center Page 7 7 6. Team Qualifi'cations TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE Pro~e~t Name/Ty~e I Location I Contact/Reference County of Riverside Fiscal Model County of and Program Riverside, CA City of Temecula Fiscal Model and Temecula, CA Analysis City of Fontana Fiscal Model and Fontan& CA Analysis of General Plan Upland, CA City of Upland Fiscal Model and Analysis of General Plan RKI!~ &&$$OC~ATE$ City of Chino Traffic Model Update City of Chino City of Hesperia City of Hespeda General Plan Traffic Model City of Murrieta City of Murrieta General Plan CimulaUon Element and Traffic Model City of Indio City of Indio General Plan Circulation Element and Traffic Model Jerry Jorifie Principal P~anner Riverside Co. Planning Dept. 4080 Lemon Street, 9~h Floor Riverside, CA 92502 909.275.3161 Allie Kuhns Sr. Management Analyst City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 909.694.6400 Gary Nordquist City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontaria, CA 92335 909.350.7677 Sylvia Schaff Senior Planner City of Upland 460 N. Euclid Avenue Upland, OA 91785 909.931.4100 City of Chino Public Works Department 13220 Central Avenue Chino, California Contact; Mr. Barry Dee 909.627.7'577 x307 City of Hesperia 15776 Main Street Hesperia, California 92345 Contact: Mr.. Paul Cook 760.947.1414 City of Mumeta 26442 Beckman Court Muraleta, California 92562 Contact: Mr~ Ed McOoy 909.698.1040 City of Indio 100 Civic Center' Malt Indio, California 92202 Contact: Mr. Amir Modarressi 760.342.6500 EARTH CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Vision Building Project Specific North of the City City of Brea Planning DMsion Plan, Brea Sphere of Influence of Brea, San Number One Civic Center Circle Bernardino Brea, California 92621-5758 County, Contact: Mr. Jay Treyinc California 7t4.990.7674 I Key Issues · Land use, phasing and infrastructure for annexaUons · Funding requirements and capital fees · Fiscal impacts of land use policy and phasing assumptions to City · General Plan fiscal analysis · General Plan fiscal analysis · Annexation financing · Economic element · Development opportunities · General Plan fiscal analysis The CTM was the first San Bernardino County subarea model to be issued a Finding of Consistency from SCAG staff Estimates of travel demand within the roadway system at buildout of the City of Hespeda Guide the development of a balanced circulation system that will provide adequate capacity to support the travel demands of the City The Indio Traffic Model provided a specialized tool which was used for ongoing analysis of changes to land use within Indio. Represents a significant refinement of forecasts developed for the Coachella Vatley Area Traffic Study. Provided a geologic constraints map Provided appraisal of concept feasibility based upon geologic constraints remedialion feasibility Page 78 Proposal' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 6. Qualifications TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE Pro~ect Name/TYl~e I Location J Contact/Reference Technical Background Report for City of Desert Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. the City of Desert Hot Springs Hot Springs, 400 South Farrell, Suite B-205 Safety Element Riverside Palm Springs, California 92262 County, Contact: Mr. John Cdste California 760.320.9040 Geotechnical Constraints Investigation for New Town Planning, Malibu Civic Center Area Malibu, San Bemardino County, Califomia EN.G~NEERINO RE;'OURC. ES City of Hemet Storm Drain Development Standards, Storm Drain Criteria and Drainage Design Manual Coachella Valley Water District Bermuda Dunes Area Drainage Study City of Temecula Old Town Temecula Utility Underground Feasibility Study City of Fontana Sewer Master Plan update County of San Bernardino County Service Area 70, Zone L, Water Master Plan Update County of San Bernardino County Service Area 70, Zone J Master Plan Update Malibu Village Civic Association C/o Malibu Bay Company Malibu, California Contact: Mr. John Perenchio, or Mr. Lynn Konheim 310.456.6555 Hemet CA Roland Trietsch City Engineer City of Hemet 220 N. Carmalita Hemet CA 92543 909.765.2360 Coachella Dan Fards, P.E., Valley CA Principal Stormwater Engineer Coachella Valley Water District P O. Box 1058 Coachella CA 9223~,i, 760.398.26.H Temecula CA John Meyer' Senior Planner City of Temecula 43220 Business Park Drive Temecu~a CA 92589 909.694.6400 Fontana CA Greg Buckne~], P,E. Principal Engineer P.O. Box 5t8 Fontana CA 92334 909.350.6646 Phelan CA Jim Iken DMsion Chief County Office of Speciat Districts 15;7 W, 5~ St, San Bernardino CA 92401 909.327.5965 High Desert Jim Iken County of San Division Chief Bernardino County Office of Special Districts 157 W. 5~h St, San Bemardino CA 92401 909,327,5965 I Key Issues · Prepared the Seismic, Geologic and Flooding Hazards Section of the Technical Background Report · Identified potential mitigation measures to be included in the Safety Element · PotenUally active Malibu Coast fault as mapped through the center of the project , ' · Liquefaction potential of the site which lies within the active flood plain of Malibu Creek · Policy Generation · Usable design criteria · Policy Creation · Multi-Agency Coordination · Use and Analysis of Existing Facilities · Research and analysis of exisUng improvements · Upgrade recommendation · Funding · Analysis of existing reports and manuals · Conversion of mapping to archive platform. ,- Analysis of existing reports and maps · Data conversion · Analysis of existing reports and maps · Data conversion The Planning Center Page 79 (3. Team Qualifications TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE Pro.~ect Name/T[pe I Location ~ Contact/Reference ' "' ..... Santee, CA City of Santee Public Library City of Redondo Beach Redondo Public Library Beach, CA City of Perds Perds, CA Public Library City of Vista Vista, CA Vista Public Library City of Temecula Yemecula, CA Parks and Recreation Master Plan Mr. Edward Ruiz Com,munity Services Dept. 10601 Magnolia Avenue Santee, CA 92701 619.258.4100 Ext. 128 Mr. Ed Hayduk (formerly of Redondo Beach) Redondo Beach, CA 805.584.4400 Ms. OIMa Gutierrez Community Development Director 909.943.5003 Mr. Rick Dudley Assistant to the City Manager Vista, CA 619.726.1340 Shawn Nelson City Manager City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecu~a, CA 92390 909.506.5100 City of Muraleta Parks and Recreation Master Plan Murdeta, CA City of Diamond Bar Diamond Bar, Parks and Recreation Master Plan CA Steve Mandoki, City Manager Jim Hoiston,. Landscape Manager City of Murrieta 26442 Beckman Cou,rt Muraleta, CA 92562 Ji~n Be Stefano, Assista--~t City Manager Bob Rose, .Community Services Director City of Diamond Bar 21660 Copley Ave. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 909.396.4694 Key Issues Needs assessment Conceptual design · Conceptual design · Construction documents · Construction observation · Conceptual design · Construction documents · Construction observation · Conceptual design · Construction documents · Construction observation Community workshops Inventory of existing facilities Telephone survey and perasonal interviews Need analysis Demand analysis Recreation trails master plan Short and long-term recommendation Sample CIP Presentation to Commission, Council and the public Community workshops Inventory of existing facilities Telephone survey and personal interviews Needs analysis Demand analysis Recreation trails master plan Short and long-term recommendation Sample CIP Presentation to Commission, Council and the public Community workshops Inventory of existing facilities Telephone survey and personal interviews Need analysis Demand analysis Short and long-term recommendations Sample ClP Presentation to Commission, Council and the public Page 80 ProposaL' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 6. Team Qual(fi'cations TEAM PR?J~,ECT EXPERIENCE ProjectName/Type I Loc,ation J Contact/Reference PURIgSS:ROSE-RS! LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS (cont#~ued) City of Orange Orange, CA IGabe Garcia Parks and Recreation Master Plan Community Services Manager City of Orange 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92660 7 '14.744 ..7271 Key Issues Community workshops Inventory of existing facilities Telephone survey and personal interviews Need analysis Recreation trails master plan Short and long-term recommendation Sample CIP Presentation to Commission, Council and the public The Planning Center Page 81 6. Team Qualifications This page intentionally left blank. Page 82 ProposaL' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR 7. Resumes 7. Resumes The Planning Center Proposal,' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/E1R Richard' E. Ramella, Principal Urban Planner Education Professional Affiliations Qualifications Project Experience B.A. University of California, Los Angeles American Planning Association Urban Land Institute Dick Ramella is the founding partner of The Planning Center. He has been a professional planner for over 39 years. As a principal of the firm, he has been involved in a wide range of significant projects over' the last 20 years. Prior to the formation of The Planning Center, Mr. Ramella served as General Planning Program Administrator for the County of Orange, California. In this capacity he was responsible for the development, management and coordination of the County's long-range planning programs. He oversaw the development of all elements of the County's General Plan. tn addition, he was responsible for the preparation of eight new community plans totaling over eighty thousand acres of land and two community redevelopment projects. Mr.. Ramella was also responsible for the development of Orange County's first Master Plan of Regional Parks. This plan led to the acquisition and development of thousands of acres of park land.. It is recognized as one of the most successful regional parks systems in the State of California. Mr.. Ramella has served throughout the State of California as a guest lecturer for the University of California Extension Services on the subject of Specific Ptans. He has long been an advocate of improved relationships between the public and private sectors in the planning process. He is widely recognized for his abilities to work with citizen"s advisory committees, special interest groups and decision mak:ers~ · Los Angeles County General Plan Streamlining Program, Los Angeles County, CA · South Sutter County General Plan Amendment, Sutter County, CA · Cathedral City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, Cathedral C~ty, CA · Yorba Linda General Plan, Yorba Linda, CA · Chino Hills Specific Plan, County of San Bernardino, CA · Harbor Boulevard Specific Plan, City of Garden Grove, CA · Community Center Specific Plan, City of Garden Grove, CA · Airport North Specific Plan, Camarillo, CA Richard E. Ramella, Principal Urban Planner Project Experience (Continued) · , Village Center Specific Plan, Big Bear Lake, CA · Highway 111 Specific Plan, City of Rancho Mirage, CA · Mission Street Rehabilitation Plan, City of Buena Park, CA · Serrano Creek Community Center Design Guidelines, County of Orange, CA · Serrano Park Development Plan, County of Orange, CA · Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, City of Newport Beach, CA · Marina del Rey Specific Plan, County of Los Angeles, CA · Village One Specific Plan Analysis, City of Modesto, CA · Kohl Ranch Specific Plan, Coachella Valley, CA RAMELLAD.UP Randal lV../ackson, ASLA, Principal Urban Designer, Landscape Architect Education Professional Registrations Professional Affiliations Qualifications Project Experience B.LA. Utah State University, Landscape Architecture Graduate Studies, University of Hawaii, Pacific Urban Studies Center Landscape Architect, California, Arizona, Nevada American Society of Landscape Architects Mr. Jackson has over 24 years of experience in the planning industry~ At The Planning Center, Mr. Jackson has been Principal-in- Charge of planning and design, as well as landscape architecture. He has been responsible for developing unique land use and community concepts for award winning communities built around and integrating open space, park and recreation systems. Mr. Jackson has a wide range of park and recreation planning and landscape architecture experience with both public and private concerns throughout the western and southwestern United States and the Pacific Basin. He has also served as Chairman on a 13 rnember Urban Design Commission that was appointed by the Pima County, Arizona Board of Supervisors. Prior to joining The Planning Center, Mr. Jackson resided in Hawaii where he served as Special Projects Manager to the Chairman of the Board of the Department of Land and Natural Resources. · Lowry AFB Phase II, Implementation of Record of Decision, Advisor to Lowry Redevelopment Authority, Denver, CO · MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan/Specific Plan, Tustin, CA · Wood Ranch Specific Plan, Simi Valley, CA · Beacon Hill Master Plan & Design Guidelines, Laguna Niguel, CA · Fiesta Istand Recreation Plan & Resource Management Program, Mission Bay, San Diego, CA · Aliso Greenbelt Management & Operations Plan, Orange County, CA · Bighorn Master Plan, Palm Desert, CA · 'The Eagle at Rancho Mirage Specific Plan, Rancho Mirage, CA · Biosphere Master Plan, Pima County, Arizona · Temecuta General Plan, Temecula, CA · Media District, Burbank, CA · Golden State Planning Program, Burbank, CA · Nod:h Natomas Master Plan, Sacramento, CA · Loma Rica Ranch, Grass Valley, CA · Fairview Valley' Specific Plan, Apple Valley, CA · La Paloma Resort Master Plan, Tucson, Arizona · El Dorado Hills South Property, El Dorado County, CA · Santa Nella Specific Plan, Merced County, CA · Lakeridge Estates, Riverside, CA · Tr'acy Urban Growth Management Plan/General Plan, Tracy, CA Randal W', Jackson, ASLA, Principal Urban Designer, Landscape Architect Project Experience (Continued) · South Sutter County General Plan Amendment, Sutter County, CA · Glen Oaks Master Plan, Gilroy, CA · Cascade Village Plan, Vancouver, Washington · Fist'ler Basin Comprehensive Master Plan, Vancouver, Washington · Northgate, Colorado Springs, Colorado · Highland Creek Land Use Plan, Charlotte, North Carolina · The Summit Master Plan, Richland, South Carolina · Sky Valley Specific Plan, Benecia, CA · Statewide Trails & Access Way Program, State of Hawaii Department of Land & Natural Resources · Mauna Kea Management Plan, State of Hawaii Department of Land & Natural Resources · Palm Hills Master Plan, Palm Springs, CA JACKSON UDL Alined C. Bell Prelect Manager Education Professional Affiliations Qualifications Project Experience University of California, Los Angeles, Geography American Planning Association Charter Member, California Planning Roundtable A~ Bell has been associated with The Planning Center since 1980. Prior to joining the firm, he managed the General Planning Division of the Orange County Environmental Management Agency, completing twenty years with the County of Orange. As a Principal of The Planning Center, he has played a key role in a number of general plans, specific plans, regional and subregional planning programs, strategic plans, congestion management programs, and air quality programs, with an emphasis in Los Angeles, Orange an,d San Bernardino Counties. In most of these assignments, Mr. Bell has been charged with conducting community participation programs and working closely with advisory committees at technical and policy levels. Much of his activity during both public sector and private sector careers has involved i;ntergovernmental coordination and public/private sector collaboration. This has been particularly the case in recent multi-governmental air quality and subregional planning projects. Of particular significance is his work on the subregional planning scale in areas such as the SELAC and South Bay Cities areas of Los Angeles County.' They resulted in a series of implementing actions and direction for subsequent phases, as well as notable col~aborative organizational changes. Mr. Bell's roles and responsibilities ranged from Project Manager to principal author; from Project Director to senior advisor. Among the numerous projects in which Mr. Bell has had a key role, the following examples illustrate the range and diversity of his experience: General Plans and Major General Plan Updates · Cathedral City, Riverside County, CA · Paramount, Los Angeles County, CA · Las Vegas, Clark County, NV · General Plan Streamlining, Los Angeles County, CA · Stanton, Orange County, CA · South Sutter County, Sutter County, CA · Yorba Linda, Orange County, CA · Temecula, Riverside County, CA · C~ovis, Fresno County, CA Regional/Subregional Planning · San Bernardino County/Cities Regional Air Quality Plan, San Bernardino County~ CA Alfred C. Bell Project Manager Project Experience (Continued) · Orange County Air Quality Technical Assistance Program, Orange County, CA · Orange County Congestion Management Program, Orange County, CA · Southeast Los Angeles County (SELAC) Air Quality Plan, SELAC Air Quality Consortium, Los Angeles County, CA · Draft Regional Air Quality Element, Southern California Association of Governments, SCAG · Local Mandated Monitoring Program, SCAG · San Bernardino Associated Governments, Congestion Management Program EIR, San Bernardino County, CA · East San Gabriel Valley Air Quality Plan, Los Angeles County, CA · South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) Subregional Plan, Phases Two and Three, Los Angeles County, CA · Growth Forecast Analysis, SBCCOG · Southeast Los Angeles County (SELAC) Subregional Plan, Los Angeles County, CA Specific/Strategic and Regulatory Planning · Chino Hills Specific Plan, San Bernardino County, CA · Harbor Corridor Specific Plan, Garden Grove, CA · Moorpark Downtown Study, Moorpark, CA · Beach Boulevard Entertainment Corridor Specific Plan, Buena Park, CA · Highland 2010 Strategic Plan · Comprehensive Development Code, Compton, CA · Zone Code Update, Stanton, CA Mr. Bell is a frequent lecturer in planning at the University of California, Irvine Extension and previously taught at both UCl and California State University, Fullerton. He is a charter member and past President of the California Planning Roundtable. Mr. Bell has been actively involved in speaking engagements on planning matters for the past 30 years. BELL_PM.WPD Karen Gulley Pre3a Manager Education Pro~ss~na!Affiliations Qua!ifica~ons Project Experience B.A., University of California, Santa Cruz, Economics Masters Program, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Urban and Regional Planning (all but thesis) American Planning Association Ms. Gulley brings to The Planning Center over eleven years of experience with an extensive background in policy planning, land use planning, and entitlement services. Her expertise is in the areas of specific plans, general plans, strategic plans, military base reuse planning. and project entitlement. As a Project Manager with The Planning Center, Ms. Gulley is responsible for the coordination and preparation of a wide variety of planning projects for both public and private sector clients. She is also responsible for developing community participation programs and facilitating public meetings and workshops. Ms. Gulley recently spent two years providing entitlement services for telecommunications facilities in Orange county. Representing Pacific Bell Mobile Services, she secured planning and other permits for over 35 sites in 12 cities in Orange County. She has also been involved in the management and preparation of the following general plans.,, military base reuse plans, specific plans, transportation planning and road fee programs, park implementation plans and strategic: plans, including: · San Bernardino Economic Development Strategic Plan, San Bernardino County, CA · Heritage Springs Master Plan, Santa Fe Springs, CA · La Palma General Plan Update, La Palma, CA · MCAS Tust:in Reuse Plan/Specific Plan, Tustin, CA · Pacific Bell Mobile Services, Wireless Communications Entitlement Services. · Winchester Hills Specific Plan / EIR, Temecula, CA · Temecula General Plan, Temecula, CA · South Pasadena General Plan, South Pasadena, CA · Valley/Ardmore Open Space Study, Manhattan Beach, CA · Southeast: Los Angeles County Air Quality Plan, Los Angeles County, CA · East San Gabriel Valley Air Quality Plan, Los Angeles County, C.A · Lake Elsinore General Plan Revision, Lake Elsinore, CA · Talega Vall:ey Specific Plan, San Clemente, CA · Regional Circulation Financing and Fee Program, San Clemente, CA · Talega Valley Local Park Implementation Plan, San Clemente, CA · New Town Specific Plan, San Benito County, CA GULLEY.WPD John H. Douglas, AICP Coordinator Education B.A. University of California, Los Angeles, Geography Graduate Studies, San Diego State University, City Planning Professional Registrations American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Affiliations Qualifications Member, American Planning Association Member, Association of Environmental Professionals Member, National Trust for Historic Preservation Guest Lecturer: University of California, Irvine; California State University, Fullerton; Golden West College Mr. Douglas has over 22 years experience in the planning industry, including 15 years of management-level experience in public planning agencies. At The Planning Center, Mr. Douglas' has been a key participant in the preparation of general plans, strategic plans, and economic development programs. Prior to joining The Planning Center, Mr. Douglas served as Principal Planner and Economic Development Coordinator for the City of Newport Beach where his duties included directing the preparation of a comprehensive revitalization strategy for Balboa Peninsula, economic development strategic planning, and administration of the city's business improvement districts. Project Experience · Orange County General Plan · Newport Beach General Plan · Newport Beach Economic Development Strategic Plan · Balboa Peninsula Revitalization Program · Balboa Peninsula Parking Management Plan · San Bernardino County Economic Development Strategic Plan · San Bernardino County Job Creation Plan · CDBG Administrator, City of Newport Beach · Business Improvement District Administrator, City of Newport Beach · Airport Area Rezoning Study, Newport Beach, CA · Newport: Beach Sidewalk Dining Program · C:ity of Industry Housing Element · Orange County Demographic Forecast, 1985-2010 Stanley R. ~Hoffman & Associates Proposah Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR STANLEY R. HOFFMAN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS and EXPERIENCE Services Provided Stanley R. Hoffman Associates is a professional consulting corporation established in 1981 providing fiscal and financial analysis, economic and policy analysis am! real estate market research for public agencies and private firms.. Services are designed to meet a variety of client needs, ranging from overall market assessments to the details of site-specific development staging seeking innovative solutions for the client's specific requirements. Services are provided individually and in cooperation with project teams in a variety of planning situations including: preparation of specific plans, redevelopment plans, general plans and amendments, annexation and incorporation studies, development agreements and fee analyses and environmental impact reports. There are two offices serving southern and northern California: Los Angeles and Alameda. Fiscal and Financial Analysis. Information is provided on cost and benefit consequences of land use and infrastructure changes to cities and counties. Means are determined for funding public infrastructure improvements required for development.. Areas of concentration are as follows: · Fiscal Impact Models · Public Costs and Revenues · Fiscal limpacts of Alternative Land Use Plans · Development I.mpact Fee Studies · Financing Strategies for Capital and Operating Costs · Annexation and Incorporation Studies Economic and Policy Analysis. Services are provided in the formulation of economic policies and strategies. Specific areas of emphasis include: · General Plan and Specific Plan Programs · Economic Development Strategies · Project Phasing Strategies · Public/Private Coordination Real Estate Market Research. Decision-relevant information on development opportunities is provided for overall market evaluations and site-specific assessments. Techniques include: · Land IJse Market Absorption Studies · Highest and Best Use Analysis · Financial Pro Formas · Market Feasibility Assessments · Growth Management Phasing Plans SItItA FISCAL, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Stanley R. Hoffm~ Associates Pro/~osal.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/E1R AREAS O'F EXPERTISE Transportation Planning and Problem Solving · Cooperative Study Management · Traffic Impact Analyses · Circulation Systems for Planned Communities · Travel Demand Modeling · General Plan Circulation Elements · Parking Studies EDUCATION University of California, Irvine: M.S., Transportation Systems Management, 1977 University of Califomia, Irvine: B.A., Social Ecology, 1975 University of California, Irvine: Certificate in Management of Transportation Programs, 1981 California Community Colleges, Instructor Credential, Public Services/Admin. 1981 John Kain, AICP Principal REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE John Kain, AICP has worked professionally in transportation planning and traffic engineering since 1975. He received the master of science degree in administration from the University of California, Irvine, where he specialized in transportation systems evaluation. Mr. Kain has served on the Institute of Transportation Engineers technica:l committees for Traffic Forecasting and Highway Access Control. His work on circulation plans and transportation studies for planned communities has included Mission Viejo, Aliso Viejo, Foothill Ranch, Bolsa Chica, and the Irvine Village of Westpark in Orange County; Sun City Palm Desert, Victoria Grove, Winchester Hills, and the Vineyard in Riverside County; South Poway and EastLake in San Diego County; Westgate and East Highlands Ranch in San Bernardino County; Rosedale Ranch and Pacificana in Kern County; Oxnard Town Center and Ormond =Beach in Ventura County; Highlands Ranch and Edgemont Ranch in Colorado. He also prepared the general plan circulation elements for fourteen cities in California, including Beaumo.nt, Hespeda, Indian Wells, Indio, Montclair, Muftieta, Norwalk, Rancho Mirage, San Jacinto, and Solana Beach. Mr. Kain has managed the development and application of traffic models and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)databases for over twenty areas in California, including Irvine, Huntington Beach, Southeast Orange County, Chino, San Bernardino County RSA 33, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Southwest Riverside County, Palm Desert, Ojai, Mammoth, and Imperial County. Mr. Kain"s experience with transportation studies for special u~ses includes the UCI Long Range Development Plan, Aliso/VVood Canyons Regional Park, MWD Eastside Reservoir Recreation Areas, Sharp Murrieta Healthcare Center, McDonnell Douglas Long Beach Facilities Expansion, the Kern County Foreign Trade Zone, and Saddleback Community Church. RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY RKJK & Associates, Inc., Principal, 1990-present Kunzman Associates, Principal, 1983-1990 Jack G. Raub Company, Manager of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, 1978-1983 Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Associate, 1976 & 1977 Califomia College of Medicine, Shuffle Bus Coordinator, 1975 AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners, American Planning Association (APA) Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Transportation Research Board (TRB) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Urban Land Institute (ULI) International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation (ISATA) John Kain, AICP Principal Examples of his work on transit oriented community designs include the Millennium Plan (El Toro Base Reuse), San Juan Capistrano Metrolink Station Area, and the South Coast Plaza Town Center. Mr. Kain also managed the preparation of parking studies for the Temecula Old Town, Bakersfield Convention Center, Perds Downtown, and UCI Bren Center. His work on commercial areas has included the Foothill Ranch Towne Centre, Murdeta Spdngs Mall (RogersDale), Carlsbad Albertsons Center, Rancho Mirage SR-111 Corddor, and the Desert Cities Auto Mall. His experience with office and industrial areas includes the Irvine Business Complex (IBC), Rialto Airport Specific Plan, Victorville Southdown industrial Park, Borel Airpark Center, and Cheyenne Airpark (Nevada). Mr. Kain's involvement with neighborhood traffic control has included the Bolsa Chica roundabout design, Mesa West Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan, and numerous residential street impact assessments. His work on freeway interchange ramp configurations and concept plans includes Washington Street at the 1-10 Freeway, Jefferson Avenue at the 1-10 Freeway, Trabuco Road at the SR-.133 Tollway and Portrero Boulevard at the SR-60 Freeway. Cooperative transportation studies managed by Mr. Kain have included the Ramona Expressway, State Route 79, and Van Buren corridors in Riverside County, the Impedal Highway corridor in Yorba Linda, planned Orange County Santa Ana River Crossings between 1-405 and Pacific Coast Highway in Orange County, and assessments of the Aliso Creek Road and Ridge Route Drive extensions in Orange County. Mr. Kain co-founded the firm of Transware Systems in 1982 to provide transportation planning software for microcomputer applications. His professional activities have included presentations for ITE meetings, model user group workshops, UCI courses, APA programs, and APA newsletter articles. RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CARL BALLARD Senior Associate Carl Ballard has worked in transportation planning and traffic engineering since 1982 and has completed studies in California, Nevada and Colorado. He has extensive experience in the management of complex analytical procedures and computer applications. Mr. Ballard is involved in many aspects of the profession, including: site access evaluation, intersection capacity analysis, traffic forecasting, circulation planning, traffic impact studies, and transportation demand management plans. WORK EXPERIENCE: RKJK & Associates, Inc. (7 years) Senior Associate Responsible for managing AutoCAD personnel; preparing traffic impact studies; performing peak hour intersection analyses using HCM, PATHPRO, TRAFFIX, and CAPSSl software; preparing parking studies and neighborhood traffic management plans. Kunzman Associates Associate Engineer (4 years) Responsible for analyzing traffic and transportation issues ranging from site design to regional network features.. Work emphasis included the analysis of develop- ment impacts, intersection service levels, traffic signal coordination and access controls, and the application of many micro-computer based programs. Kunzman Associates Engineering Technician (4 years) Responsible for analysis of roadway capacity requirements, evaluation of accident data, preparation of computer-based technical drawings, and collection of volume and street inventory data. EDUCATION: BA, California State University, Fullerton, Mathematics, with emphasis in Probability and Statistics, 1986. Certificate, Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering, University of California Institute of Transportation Studies, 1984~ Certificate, Site Impact Traffic Evaluation, Institute of Transportation Engineers Professional Development Seminar, 1987. Certificate, Transportation Demand Management, California State University, Fullerton, University Extended Education Services, 1992. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Planning Association (APA) - Orange County Membership Director (1996-1997) Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) RKJK INC. CARLETON WATERS, P.E. Senior Associate Carleton Waters has worked professionally in transportation planning and engineering since 1982. Mr. Waters received the Master of Science degree in civil engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His professional activities include election to the board of the Southwestern Region TRANPLAN Model Users Group. WORK EXPERIENCE: RKJK & Associates, Inc. {5 years) Senior Associate Developed and applied travel demand models in support of General Plan update efforts and major development projects in Orange County, Riverside County and San Bernardino County. Prepared traffic and air quality impact studies including transportation risk assessments, multi-modal transportation plans, and CMP analyses. DKS Associates (3 years) Senior Transportation Planner Supervised model development, validation and finding of consistency in accordance with SCAG requirements for Riverside County. Prepared traffic impact studies throughout southern California. Project manager of study assessing the impacts of the transportation of hazardous materials by both train and truck in Bakersfield, CA. HMM Associates {2 years) Transportation Planner Project manager of citywide traffic studies. Studies included development of calibrated models of study area con.ditions. Project manager of traffic impact study for transport of hazardous materials to and from a proposed hazardous waste incinerator in Braintree, MA. Project planner for downtown Boston development projects, including transit patronage estimates and parking demand analysis. · Louis Berger & Associates (1 year) Assistant Transportation Engineer Project engineer for intersection improvement projects and projects, including impact and corridor studies. · Orange County Transportation Commission (1 year) Transportation Planning Intern · Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS) {1 year) Research Associate CME Corporation (1 year) Construction costs, quantities and scheduling estimates. EDUCATION: · BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 1981. · MS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 1986. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: · Registered Civil Engineer, California, 1994, No. 52915 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: · Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) · American Planning Association {APA) transportation planning SCOTT SATO Transportation Engineer Scott Sato has been working in the field of transportation planning and engineering since 1989. Mr. Sato has worked throughout northern and southern California on General and Specific Plan updates, transit modeling, traffic forecasting and circulation plans. His other experiences include traffic signal design, traffic impact analysis, and impact fee assess- ments. WORK EXPERIENCE: RKJK & Associates, Inc. (3 years) Transportation Engineer Responsible for subarea traffic model networks in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Developed future traffic forecasts and analyzed associated impacts of major development projects in Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Assisted governmental staff in reviewing traffic impact studies. DKS Associates (4 years) Transportation Engineer Developed a calibrated TRANPLAN model for the City of Lancaster. Assisted the Metropolitan Transportation Agency in creating transit network alternatives with rail, bus, and HOV components. Prepared traffic impact studies throughout Southern California. Assisted in updating the traffic impact fee systems for the Cities of Palmdale and Roseville. Linscott, Law, and Greenspan (1 year) Engineering Intern Responsible for conducting peak hour turning movement counts and parking lot surveys. Performed intersection capacity analysis utilizing HCM, ICU and Circular 212 methodologies. Prepared computer graphics for technical reports. EDUCATION: · BS - University of California, Irvine, Civil Engineering, 1990 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: · California Engineer - In-Training, No.. XE084714 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: · Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) · Southwestern Region TRANPLAN Model Users' Group Earth Consultants International, Inc. Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR TANIA GONZALEZ, RG, CEG Project Consultant EDUCATION M.S., Geology (Engineering Geology Option), Texas A&M University, 1989 B.S., Geology (Engineering Geology Option), Texas A&M University, Minor in Anthropology, 1986 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS 1994/Registered Geologist/CalifomiaJRG 5868 1994/Certified Engineering Geologist/Califomia/CEG 1859 40-Hour OSHA Certified Health and Safety Training First Aid and CPR Training PROJECT EXPERIENCE Technical Background Studies for Environmental Impact Reports Lusk Marblehead Coastal Property, San Clemente Holly Hills Storm Drain, West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and San Bernardino Olinda Heights Project, Brea Materials Transfer Facility, City of Industry Fifth Train, ARCO Refinery, City of Rancho Cucamonga Proposed Amendment to the Crenshaw Development Plan, City of San Bernardino Hidden Creek Ranch Project, near Moorpark, Ventura County Fox Field Industrial Corridor Specific Plan, City of Lancaster Proposed Expansion of Section of Highway 101, Ventura and San Bernardino Counties Technical Background Studies for Safety Elements Desert Hot Springs Big Bear Lake Rancho IVlirage Garden Grove Chino Hills Calimesa Town of Yucca Valley Santa Monica Culver City Burbank Rolling Hills Estates San Bernardino County Cathedral C, ity Land Use Studies North LaVeme properties Murdock Properties near Yorba Linda Steams Oil Field, Brea Olinda Ranch Elementary School Site, Brea West Coyote Oil Field, Fullerton and La Habra Signal Hill Newport-Banning Oil Field, Newport Beach TANIA GONZALEZ, RG, CEG Project Consultant SELECTED PROJECTS Principal Investigator and Project Geologist, Geotechnical and environmental (hazardous materials/waste) portions, Environmental Impact Report, Holly Hills Storm Drain, West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and San Bernardino. Assessed the short-term (during construction) and long-term (operationall) impacts associated with the 7-mile storm-drain corridor, including: potential for fault rapture, strong ground shaking from buried thrust faults, liquefaction potential, compressible organic soils, high ground water and stability of the excavation during construction.~ presence of methane and contaminants associated with oil fields, and migration of hydrocarbon products from leaking underground storage tanks and broken pipelines. Principal Investigator and Project Geologist, Geotec:hnical and Environmental (Hazardous Waste) sections of the Environmental Impact Report, City of Industry Materials Transfer Facility. Drilled, logged and sampled several small-diameter borings to evaluate the liquefaction potential of the underlying soils; addressed the geotechnical constraints associated with the organic-rich soils that occur in the near surface; and provided site-specific mitigation measures. Project Manager and Pl'oject Geologist, Geotechnical And Environmental Assessment for Feasibility of Development, Olinda Ranch Elementary School Site, Brea. Assessed the potential for strong ground motions and coseismic fault rupture, evaluated the potential impacts of methane and hydrogen sulfide associated with existing oil wells, and potential [yesticide and herbicide contamination of the soils in an area historically used as a plant nursery. Project Manager, Baseline Seismic and Geologic~ Study' for a 300-acre property in the city of La Verne. Project included a desk-top study and site reconnaissance to assess the seismic, geologic and geotechnical feasibility of developing the properties. A detailed review of aerial photographs was conducted to assess the possibility of faults and landslides occurting 'at: the site. Project Manager and Principal Investigator, Teclmical Background Report for the Safety Element for the City of Chino Hills. The project included identifying the seismic hazards, geologic hazards, flooding, fire hazards and hazardous waste issues applicable to the City, and recommending goals, policies, and programs that the City could implement to reduce the impact posed by these hazards. Project Manager, Technical Background Reports for the Revised Safety Elements for the cities of Garden Grove, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, [)esert Hot Springs, Big Bear Lake, Calimesa, and the Town of Yucca Valley. The projects included analysis of geological and cultural data, preparation of site vulnerability scenarios applicable to critical facilities, and evaluation the seismic risk posed by active and potentially active faults in the region. Project Geologist, Seismic hazards Sections of the Revised Safety Elements for the Cities of Santa Monica, Culver City, Burbank, and Rolling Hills Estates. The projects included researching the active and potentially active faults that have the: potential of impacting these cities, calculating the peak ground accelerations that different magnitude earthquakes could generate at these cities, and assessing the potential for surface ground rupture and iiquefaction~ Goals, policies and programs that could be implemented by the cities to reduce the risk posed by these seismic hazards were provided. Third Party Reviewer, Ground Water Investigations, Olinda and Olinda-Alpha Landfills. Reviewed ground water and soil gas studies conducted by others, and provided City of Brea with expert opinion regarding the potential for landfill leachate and landfill gas to migrate and impact the proposed O!inda Heights residential development. ELDON GATH, RG, CEG PrinciDal Geologist EDUCATION PhD Program in Geology, University of California at Riverside, 1993-Present [PhD Research Tectonic geomorphology of the southeastern San Bernardino basin] Post-graduate study in Engineering Geology, California State at San Bernardino, 1982-1990 [M.S. Research Tectonic geomorphology and neotectonics of the Whittier fault in southern California ] B.S. in Geology, University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology, 1978 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Registered Geologist: California, RG 4140, (1986) Engineering Geologist: California, EG ~ 292, (1986) PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. Gath has particular experience with the evaluation of active faults for construction site planning, the development of seismic safety programs and policies, and the determination of remediation and design alternatives for geologically sound site development. He has been funded by the U.S. Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, and the Southern California Earthquake Center for research into seismic hazards of several faults and folds. He is presently involved in funded research on identifying and quantifying rates of blind thrust fault deformation in the southeastern San Bernardino basin, for his doctoral dissertation. He is also heavily involved in professional practice organizations, including the Association of Engineering Geologists (President 1996-7, as well as a past southern California Section Chair), the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (Technology Transfer Committee), and is the AEG liaison to The NEHRP Coalition. SELECTED PROJECTS Project Manager for the preparation of a new combined Seismic and Safety Element for the County of San Bernardino. The project necessitated the collection, collation, and analysis of geologic and cultural data for the entire County of San Bernardino, an area of over 4,000 square miles. The data was transcribed onto eight separate 1:100,000-scale overlay sheets for use in hazard abatement analysis by the Department of Regional Planning. All supporting technical data and discussions as to the data sources, reliability, adequacy, and recommended programs for either current usage or future enhancement were compiled into a 430 page Technical Report "Hazard Reduction in San Bernardino County". In addition to the extensive data collection effort, the main focus of the project was to develop the Goals, Policies, and Programs for San Bernardino County to implement as part of their Five Year Seismic Hazards Reduction Program. The final preparation of the Element involved close coordination and meetings with the County Planning staff, including testimony before the County Planning Commission, several local public hearings, presentations to civic groups, and County Board of Supervisors' presentations prior to final adoption. The project was awarded the: 1991 Distinguished Service Award by the National Association of Counties. Principal Geologist and Project Manager for the revision and updating of the Santa Monica Safety Element. The project involved a very close working relationship with several city departments, including ELDON GATH, RG, CEG Principal Geologist engineering, planning, emergency services, and fire, to incorporate the current efforts of the City into the 'action programs of the new Safety Element. The study also resulted in the relocation and reclassification of the Santa Monica fault as an active seismic hazard. However, because of our association with the Southern California Earthquake Center, the City Council and planning staff were fully apprised of this new earthquake threat, two weeks before the SCEC press release on the Santa Monica fault was issued. During the Safety Element review period, the M6.7 Northridge earthquake occurred, causing extensive structural damage in the city. At city request, we served as information sources for displaced citizens at a public information meeting immediately after the earthquake, and provided guidance and recommendations to city emergency response officials. Principal Geologist and Consultant to the City of Brea fi:>r their Vision Building project in planning a 7,000-acre expansion to the City. The Sphere of Influence expansion area includes the active Whittier fault, several hundred landslides and oil wells, thousands of cubic yards of non-engineered earth fill, and large zones of active crude oil seepage (brea). The purpose of the project was to involve the citizens of Brea, the property owners, potential land developers, oil field representatives, and a selected team of consultants (Core Team) in an intimate design process to master plan the future of Brea, involving field trips, weekend design charettes, and weekly meetings. Principal Geologist and Project Manager for a seismic hazard investigation of the San Bernardino Valley College to locate the active traces of the San Jacinto fault for campus redevelopment planning. The San Bernardino Valley College campus in San Bernardino was constructed gradually from the early 1930's to the early 1970's upon an elevated pressure ridge, (the Bunker Hill Dike) formed along the San Jacinto fault. As part of an overall campus redevelopment planning, this study was undertaken to quantify the fault rupture hazard through the SBVC. In addition to the threat posed by surface rupture, other secondary seismic impacts were addressed, including liquefaction, shaking amplification, and ground deformation due to folding. 'The project involved the excavation of eight trenches within the campus area to expose the traces of the San Jacinto fault, completion of twelve boreholes to depths of 50-100 feet, coupled with 45 cone penetrometer tests, and shear wave velocity profiling of the borings. The trenches revealed that the surface trace of the fault passes through four of the school's buildings. Eight other buildings were determined to be at risk due to secondary ground fracturing or their location across an active surface fold caused by shallow blind thrust faulting. Project Geologist and Manager for a planning study of" 200 acres in preparing the Malibu Civic Center Specific Plan. The project: area contained seYere constraints from the Malibu Coastal fault, shallow ground water, earthquake induced liquefaction, and waste water disposal. To evaluate the impact of the fault, 80 cone penetrometer (CPT) and 5 continu. ous core borings were emplaced, and stratigraphic units correlated between the borings. The project involved presentation and discussion of findings at three public workshops and several General Plan Task Force meetings. The project also comprised technical consultants for Planning, Civil, Biology, Traffic., and Economics all working towards a comprehensive, mixed-use development plan for a "downtown" Malibu; a plan that incorporated site constraints and public input into a viable town center. The study was able to document that the mapped fault was an older structure, and posed no impacts to the proposed lm~d plan. Principal Geologist for the planning and redevelopment: of the Signal Hill oil field into a master planned residential community, within the Newport-Inglewood fault zone. The project commenced with a thorough data review of the site, followed by subsurface trenching to locate the active strands of the Newport-Inglewood fault system as required by the Alquist-Priolo Act. the Cherry Hill fault and Northeast Flank faults were located and provisional structural setbacks were developed. Extensive geotechnical issues were encountered, including hydrocarbon contaminated soils, thick oil field fills, existing production infrastructure, and adjacent development. Detailed design investigations, and construction mapping, observation, and testing services were provided throughout the phasing of the ELDON GATH, RG, CEG 'Principal Geologist development. Project Geologist for a geotechnical investigation and planning study to rehabilitate and develop a shale slag quarry in the Chino Hills. The site was a former burnt (expanded) shale facility where the bedrock shales were quarried, baked, and processed as light weight aggregate materials. After approximately 15 years of operation, the facility was closed and the site abandoned. As part of the redevelopment study, the site was explored using borehole and trench excavations, field geologic: mapping of bedrock outcrops and mine waste and debris, and depths to ground water mapped as part of a feasibility study for onsite sewage disposal. Based upon the investigation, a land use plan was developed, and recommendations for the remediation of the developable portions of the site were presented. Principal Geologic Consultant for a technical review of the Toland Canyoa Landfill near Santa Paula, in Ventura County. The purpose of the study was to complete a third..~party technical review of the geologic issues at the Toland Canyon Landfill in Ventura County. The review focused on the issue of active faulting, seismic design, groundwater monitoring and slope stability. The initial review stimulated the RWQCB to require the landfill operator to undertake extensive new investigations designed to address the age of faulting across the landfill footprint. The new trenching results were reviewed and discussed in the field with all interested parties, which led to additional focused investigations to address newly uncovered faulting issues. The review was instrumental in stimulating these new studies by generating enhanced regulatory appreciation of the issues, and also led to the development of different, more appropriate, design measures to mitigate the site's geologic conditions for safe landfill operation. Project Manager for the preparation of the geology, environmental, and geotechnical engineering sections of an EIR/EIS for the Ports of Long Beach and San Bernardino 2020 Plan. The proposed 2020 Plan would result in the expansion of the two port facilities by approximately 1,500 additional acres of new dredged landfill area. The project was particularly sensitive due to the potential presence of toxic materials within the harbor bottom sediments that were to provide the maiority of the landfill materials. The EIR/EIS evaluated the conditions, the impacts, and the alternatives both avoidable and unavoidable. Four different expansion alternative concepts were evaluated, including tt~e no project alternative. The findings of the EIR/EIS were instrumental in focusing the awareness of harbor officials onto the issue of seismic risk from an active fault [Palos Verdes Hills fault] causing surfac~ rupture or deformation of the new landfill area, and onto the new issue of a "blind" fault underlying tlhc entire harbor area [Torrance- Wilmington fault]. Project Manager for the geotechnical portion of the EIR for the proposed Powder Canyon Golf Course facility and private residential community in the La Habra Heights portion of the Puente Hills, San Bernardino County. The project involved moving over 10 million cubic yards of' earth to achieve design grades. The dominant geotechnical impacts to the project were landslide mitigation and risk to offsite properties, deep fill subsidence, and the activity of faults throughout the proiect. Engineering Reso~rces Proposal: Ram'ho Cut~tmonga General Plan Iv~date/EIR BARRY BIERSCHBA CH, P.E. Project Manager PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Mr. Bierschbach has actively participated in facilities planning, design and construction management for both water and wastewater improvement projects. Planning efforts have included the preparation of facilities master plans, fair-share analysis, project reports, facility plans, environmental assessments and systems evaluations for water, wastewater and reclaimed water facilities. Typically, the various studies include project specific data on land use, zoning, levels of development: existing public works facilities; preliminary utility system layouts; project financing; annexation data; and recommendations for proposed facilities. Analyses of system maintenance and power costs; design criteria; plan implementation and project chronology; and methods of project financing. Mr. Bierschbach's technical capabilities are demor~,strated by the following representative assignments: City of Fontana Sewer Master Plan Update - Project Manager during the preparation of an update of the City's sewer master plan prepared in the early 1990's. Mr. Bierschbach managed the update of the master plan and conversion of existing mapping and database information to systems consistent with the City's current GIS. Groundwater Management Study - Author of the Lytle Creek Basin Groundwater Study for the Lytle Creek Water Conservation Association which analyzed the production of groundwater, safe yield of the Basin, overdraft of the Basin and recommendations and design for additional water conservation facilities, and proposed amendments t:o existing water rights judgments for the Lytle Creek groundwater basin. Zone L Water Master Plan Update - Project Manager during the preparation of a water master plan update for Zone L, County Service Area 70 in unincorporated, high desert areas of the County of San Bernardino. Water Rights - Investigation and mapping of water rights for the following agencies and associations: · Lytle Creek Water Conservation Association · Rialto Basin Groundwater Management Association · West San Bernardino County Water District · City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department In addition, Mr. Bierschbach has been involved in the design of water and wastewater facilities including pipelines, pump stations, storage facilities and treatment works. Also, he has authored numerous reports and papers on the effluent management and water reuse for various agency throughout Southern California. REGIS TRA TION: California, 1976, Civil Engineer, Registration No. 26854 EDUCATION: B.S., 1969, Geology, University of Redlands, Redlands, California Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona California DAVID LAWRENCE Project Engineer Water and Wastewater PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Mr. Lawrence ~s actively involved in the planning and design of water and wastewater systems for the various agencies and special districts. Planning efforts have included research and evaluation of various water and wastewater models, database maintenance, model conversion and calibration, financial analysis, system plans and the development of capital improvement plans. On-going and significant assignments include: City of Fontana Sewer Master Plan Update - Project Manager during the preparation of an update of the City's sewer master plan prepared in the early 1990's. Mr. Lawrence managed the update of the master plan and conversion of existing mapping and database information to systems consistent with the City's current GIS. County Service Area 70 - Project engineer during the preparation of water master plan updates in unincorporated areas of the high desert in the County of San Bernardino, including: Zone L Water Master Plan Update - Dat~ conversion and computer modeling of existing pipelines and proposed wells, booster stations and storage facilities. Zone J Water Master Plan Update - Data conversion and computer modeling of existing pipelines and proposed wells, booster stations and storage facilities. In addition, Mr. Lawrence provides consulling services to the City of Huntington Beach Water Department on a regular basis. His responsibilities include project review, development of conditions of approval, public assistance, capital project management, fire flow analysis, staff report generation and other duties assigned by Department personnel. EDUCATION: B.S., 1995, Environmental Engineering, University of California Riverside, California MATT BRUDIN, P.E Project Engineer Flood Control and Utilities PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Over the past 13 years, Mr. Brudin has been involved in a number of complex planning, design and construction projects. His ability to effectively communicate with agency personnel and team members provides the vital link between client and consultant ensures that the goals of each project are met. Mr. Brudin has a broad base of experience in various disciplines including site development, streets and roads, grading and drainage, and flood control facilities. Projects recently undertaken by Mr. Brudin invol,~ing the planning and design of drainage structures, streets, utilities and grading include the following s~gnificant assignments: Bermuda Dunes Area Drainage Study - Project Manager for a focused drainage study of 13.5 square miles in the Coachella Valley commissioned by the Cities of Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta and Palm Desert, and the County of Riverside with the Coachella Valley Water District acting as lead agency. The study involved the development of drainage criteria specific to the area, preparation of hydrologic parameters, development of hydrologic models, preparation of alternative alignments, recommendations, and the preparation of an implementation plan. Storm Drain Development Standards, Storm Drain Criteria and Drainage Design Manual- Project Manager during the preparation of a focused manual to provide for the planning and implementation of planned storm drainage systems in the City of Hemet. Major elements of the manual addressed the goals and objectives of the City, provided written policy statements related to the development of drainage systems, preparation of preliminary drainage design and submittal, and established criteria for the design of surface and subsurface drainage and flood control facilities. Old Town Temecula Utility Underground Feasibility Study - Project Manager during the preparation of a study analyzing the feasibility of undergrounding existing overhead utility systems and service connections. The study involved comprehensive field review of existing overhead systems, collection and analysis of record data and preliminary design of system undergrounding. Prior to the formation of Engineering Resources of Southern California, Mr. Brudin participated in the development of equally significant drainage, site development and street projects. Specifically, he has managed or participated in the preparation of the 'following master drainage plans: · City of Palm Desert - Master' Plan of Drainage · City of Coachella - Drain Master Plan · City of Placentia - Drainage Master - Update · Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District - Winchester Area Master Drainage Plan Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District - Green Acres Master Drainage Plan Information on these projects will be provMed upon request. REGISTRATION: California, 1987, Civil Engineer, No. 41836 EDUCATION: Graduate Courses, Water Resources Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomorla BSCE, 1984, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California Corporation Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Phtn Update/EIR James W. Hunt Hunt Research Corporation P.O. Box 291 Soh,ang, California 9.3464 (805) 688-4625, jhunt l ( )gte. net PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND 36 years Fire Service related experience; 20 years consulting experience, Hunt Research Corporation; Faculty member of National Fire Academy and various State fire academies; Previously, 16 years operating and management experience as Fire Service professional (firefighter through Battalion Chief') for Glendale, Huntington Beach and Santa Barbara County. EXPERIENCE RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT Management studies and Strategic plan preparation for a number of clients; some of whom are listed below. Each project included management reviews; current service level analysis; projection of future service requirements for both fire protection and emergency medical services (ALS and BLS); and Fire station facility and location analysis, training center analysis. Also included evaluation of codes and ordinances and review of impact of intensified requirements for built-in protection. · Hesperia San Jose Manhattan Beach Huntington Beach · Lompoc · Bellevue, Washington Foothill Fire Protection District (Rancho Cucamonga Fire Dept.) · Cambria · Santa Barbara County · El Segundo · Arroyo Grande · San Luis Obispo · Auburn, Washington · Santa Cruz Management audits, each of which have included evaluation of all departmental programs (e.g., Hazmat; public education; plan check and development review; etc.); service level analysis for fire suppression and emergency medical services; Fire station facilities, financial analysis of all fees and revenues; and training program evaluation. Also included staffing level evaluation of all functions and review of departmental management practices. Clients include: · Pasadena · Manhattan Beach · Foothill Fire Protection District · Tahoe City · Brisbane (Public Safety Department) · Paradise · Cambria Solvang Paso Robles · Atascadero · Running Springs · San Luis Obispo · Twenty Nine Palms · South Ogden, Utah · Arcadia Monrovia Evaluation of fire and emergency medical services provided under ,contract by an outside agency. Projects included service level analysis for both fire protection and :EMS; evaluation of support programs (e.g., fire prevention and Hazmat); and indepth evaluation of service costs. Clients include: · Commerce (Los Angeles County Fire Department) · South Gate (Los Angeles County Fire Department) Variety of special focus studies related to the delivery of fire and emergency medical services. Representative projects include: Fire Service staffing alternatives study for the United States Fire Administration; Analysis of airport fire protection staffing requirements for the Reno Airport Authority; Counsel on fire protection ordinances for new development for Cambria, Solvang, Lompoc, Foothill Fire Protection District and County of Santa Barbara; Fire protection planning for major hazardous materials occupancies; Development of a fee program to make the fire preventin program and staff self-supporting for Napa County; Fire protection planning for major developments in the wildland/urban interface; · Counsel in training center design for several clients including Kern County, a four city consortium in the State of Washington, and a multi city regional center in Santa Cruz County. · Counsel on feasibility of Fire Service consolidation in the Reno area. · Development of Risk based Standards of Coverage for the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the California State Fire Academy. Extensive experience as an instructor and curriculum developer in the area of fire service management, command techniques, and wildland-urban interface planning. Representative experience includes: National Fire Academy: Curriculum developer and instructor since 1980. Co-authored the first two-week fire prevention course taught by the National Fire Academy. Also co-authored the first three incident command courses for the Academy. State Fire Academies; Faculty member of California State Fire Academy since 1975. Specializes in fire operations, emergency management and wildland-urban interface planning. · University of California at Santa Barbara; Emergency Planning and Management of Hazmat Emergencies. · Taught numerous courses for various Cities (Fire Command & Emergency Management). Participated in design and implementation of the first Joint Powers Agreement boundary drop program in California, for the City of Huntington Beach. Designed and implemented a 4-city training facility, Fire Stations, multi-city training manuals and multi-agency dispatching (::enter. EDUCATION , AA Fire Science AA Police Science BS Fire Science Certified Hazardous Materials Management Specialist Registered Environmental Assessor. CONSULTANT EXPERIENCE MATRIX JIM HUNT RELEVANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONSULTING EXPERIENCE:* · Pasadena · Huntington Beach · Manhattan Beach · Rancho Cucamonga (Foothill Fire Protection District) Arroyo Grande · Paso Robles · Rancho Cucamonga Atascadero · Commerce South Gate Paradise Cambria United States Fire Administration · Solvang · Running Springs · Lompoc · El Segundo · Nape County · Santa Barbara County · Tahoe City · Brisbane Bellevue, Washington · San Luis Obispo · San Jose Auburn, Washington · South Ogden, Utah · Twenty Nine Palms · Hesperia · Arcadia · Monrovia · Santa Cruz *Certain projects were performed as a sub contractor to other firms. **Most projects were performed by Hunt Research Corp, Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. Proposal.' Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR Education: Experience: Licenses: Volunteer Services: Appointments: Affiliations: Lectures: .lames C. Wilson, Principal Thirtieth Street Architecls, Inc. Bachelor of Architecture. University of C~i~lifornia, Berkeley, 1!)71 · Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc., Newport Beach, CA October 1976 ..~ Present: · Rolly Pulaski, AIA and Associates, Newport Beach, CA September 1973-.. October 1976 · Christopher R. Wojciechowski, AIA, Los Angeles, CA September 197 ! - September 1973 · State of California - Registration #C8994 · State of Hawaii ... Registration # 4694 · National Council of Architectural Registration Boards -# 20,988 · Exploratory Learning Center, City of Santa Ana · Feasibility Study of Rehabilitating Victorian Residence for Civic Center Use, City of Hemet · Orange County Free Clinic Space Planning, City of Anaheim · Ballet Pacifica, C. it:y of Irvine. Discovery Museum of Orange County, Board of Directors · Member of National Trust for Historic Preservation · Member of iFriends of Terra Cotta · Member of the Los Angeles Conservancy · Member California Preservation Foundation. · Former Chairman of the Historic Preservation Committee for the Orange County Chapter AIA · Former Member of National AIA Historic Resources Committee · "Rehabilitation of the Third Street Mall", University of Southern California, 1985 · "Rehabilitation of The Samuel Kraemer Building" California Historic Preservation Conference, 1985 · "Old Town Irvine Rehabilitation" Orange County AIA Lecture Series, 1988 · "Downtown Revitalization", NAHRO Conference, 1994. · "Historic Preservation in Orange County", 1994 · "Design Guidelines and Facade Renovation" Chinatown Development Committee, Fresno, 1995 Education: Experience: Licenses: Volunteer Services: Appointments: Affiliations: Lectures: John C. Loomis, Principal Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. · Bachelor of A['chitectm'e. Syracuse University, 1970 · Bachelor of A['ts, Syracuse University, 1969 · Thirtieth Street ArchiI:ects, Inc., Newport Beach. CA October 1976 .- Present · Rolly Pulaski, AIA artd Associates. Newport Beach, CA September 1971 - October 1976 · State of California - Registration #C8684 · State of Idaho - Registration # AR-1124 · NCARB #21.,566 · Amerige Building, City of Fullerton · Exploratory Learning Center · California Missions Quincentennial Preservation Project City of Santa Fe Spri:ngs, Home for the Homeless Project · Getty Conservation Institute Seismic Adobe Committee · California Mission Quincentennial Advisory Committee · ()range County Cultural Resources Advisory Committee · Member o:f National Trust for Historic Preservation · Member o:f the Victorian Society in America · Member of the Smithsonian Institute · ADA approaches to Historic Structures, CPF, 1997 · Mission San I...uis Rey, Summer Lecture Series, 1990 California Mission Studies Association Conference, 1990 · E1 Paso Mission Studies Conference, 1990 · California Preservation Foundation Workshop, 1990 · League of Califi:)rnia Cities. Downtown Revitalization, 1990 · American Planning Association, California Chapter, 1990 · Oceanside Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, 1990 San Juan Capistrano Historical Society, 1990 · San Clemente Historical Society, 1990 California Historic Preservation Conference, 1986, 1989 · "Historic Preservation as a Tool for Redevelopment", Southern California [nstitut:e of Architecture, 1985 · California Pollytechnic University, Pomona · C. alifornia State University, Long Beach · Saddleback Ciommunity College Putkiss Rose-RSI Architectum Landscape Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR Par'tc~"Greenbelt Master Plans and Financing STEPHAN ROSE ?rtncipal-in-Char~e. Purkiss Rose-RSl Landscape Arch itecture, Recreation and Park Planning EDUCATION: 1~.~'. in Lancts'cape .4rchiteclure, Slate J>o[ytechnic Umversity, Pomona. CaIiforma. Master Plan development for four parks in the San Bernardino mountains. Urban planning for redevelopment of the Fullerton Central Business District. A.A. in Architectural 7kchnology, Orange Coast College. RESPONSIBILITIES: Mr. Rose's responsibilities will be to oversee the project, schedule personnel, facilitate community workshops, participate with the development of the needs and demand analysis and prepare the text for the General Plan segment. EXPERIENCE: Stephan Rose has been with the firm since 1968. During this period he has participated in all areas of landscape architecture and master planning. Hie was involved in the development of the Ten-Year Master Plan for the Big Bear Valley Recreation and Park District. Mr. Rose was also instrumental in the development of the Twenty-Year Master Plan for the Cities of Temecula, Hermosa Beach, Diamond Bar, Murrieta and the Town of Yucca Valley. He is currently working with the City of Orange on its City-Wide Park and Recreation Master Plan. The process involved obtaining public: input through workshops where Mir. Rose: acted as t~.cilitator. Design and development of Manzanita Heights Park, Courson Park, the 40-acre Palms Park Master Plan and the 20-acre Desert Sands Park in Palmdale, the 1991 community park award-winner. Mr. Rose also participated in the development of Hermosa Park, Old Town Park and Beryl Park West in Rancho Cucamonga. He was likewise involved in generating renovation concepts for all schools in the Rowland Unified School District and development of standard site drawings for the San Diego City School District. He participated in the formulation of specific guidelines for site improvements for Lockheed, Palmdale as well as the expansion of the Hughes Ground Systems, design for the Chevron Oil Field Research Corporate Headquarters in La Habra and renovation of Beckman Instruments in Fullerton. Projects in the private sector have included restaurants, hotels, hospitals, retail, senior housing, industrial and commercial parks, and recreation areas for multi-family housing projects. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Projects throughout Southern California include the following: Stephan Rose has been involved in many community projects and organizations in Fullerton. He is the appointed landscape architect for the California State University pur[dss-rose-raJ Parlcs/(ireenbelt ~!aster Plans and Financing Study, Cid, of C'hula k~xta STEPHAN ROSE (continued) Fullerton campus. He served as a Park and Recreation Commissioner and is currently a Fullerton Arboretum Commissioner. He is a past Chairman of the Arboretum Advisory Board and past chairman of the Fullerton Redevelopment Architectural Review Board. Currently, he is a member of the Advisory Board of Fullerton Community College and Golden West Community College and a board member of the Tree Society of Orange County. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: · Member, American Society of Landscape Architects · Member, California Park and Recreation Society · Member, Washington Recreation and Park Association · Member, Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation · Professional Affiliate, American Institute of Architects REGISTRATION: Landscape Architect CLARB ~t1216 California #1513 Idaho #LA-255 Iowa #370 Michigan #1255 Oregon #395 Washington #669 pur[6ss-rose-rsi Parlc~"Greenbel! :$Iaxter Plans and Financing Study, City of ChuIa k~a;ta ,JIM PICKEl_, ?rmcipal, Purkiss Rose-RSl L andscape A rch!tecture, Recreation and Park Planning EDUCATION: l?. S. in Landxcape ,4rcht:teclure, State Polytechnic Umversity, Califorma CalijGrm~ Poreonce. RESPONSIBILITIES: As a principal of the firm, Mr. Pickel is involved in office administration, contrac~ project management and production management. He will be the project manager and handle the day to day activities with our office. He will also be handling the site inventories, construction cost analysis and recommendations. He,' will participate in the preparation of the final report. acre Beckman Instruments Fullerton facility and was responsible for developing construction documents for phase one of the Beckman project. He designed and prepared construction documents for the Astronomy and Nature Center Mile Square Park, City of Fountain Valley for the County of Orange. He was responsible for the design of Amtrak Station platforms and plazas, City of Fullerton and was project manager for the Pedestrian Bridge at the Amtrak Station. Mr. Pickel rewrote and finalized the design guidelines for the community of Aliso Viejo for the Mission Viejo Company. EXPERIENCE: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Jim Pickel has been involved with project management, design development, working drawings and irrigation design for Putkiss Rose since joining the firm in 1984. He has completed projects ranging from public: parks to commercial, industrial, and residential development. Mr. Pickel was the project manager tbr the City of Diamond Bar's Parks and Recreation Master Plan and is the project manager for the City of Murrieta's Parks and Recreation Master Plan. He designed the Master Plan for the 20-acre Bluff Top Park in Huntington Beach and the Huntin,on Beach Main Street Pedestrian Walkways. Mr. Pickel is the Project Manager for the Pier Plaza and South Beach Improvements in Huntington Beach. He designed the specific plan for Arovista Park.~ Brea, as xvelI as the Master Plan for the 57- Mr. Pickel has been involved in numerous projects and organizations in Yorba Linda. He has served on the Board of Directors for the City of Yorba Linda Little League for the past nine years. Mr. Pickel is a past Parks and Recreation Commissioner for the City of Yorba Linda. Mir. Pickel is a Planning Commissioner for the City of Yorba Linda. He also serves on the Board of Directors for the California Parks and Recreation Society, District X. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: · Member, California Park and Recreation Society. · Member, Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation. pur~iss-rose-rsi CHRISTINE COMAN Principal, Cornan Consulting, Inc. EDUCATION: B.S. in Chemistry, Drexel UniversiO; Philadelphia, PA · [.S. in Business Administration, San Diego State College, San Diego, CM EXPERIENCE: Ms. Coman recently retired as a principal with Alfred Gobar Associates, a highly respected land use economics consulting firm with a nationwide clientele with offices in ()range County, CA. She had been associated with this firm and its predecessor entities for the past 35 years and continues to work with the firm as an independent consultant as well as operating her personal consulting practice. During her tenure with Alfred Gobar Associates, ms. Coman directed land use anti fiscal impact studies for municipal and private clients. She has also participated in and coordinated diversified projects for private clients, including highest and best land use studies, housing demand analyses, retail potential analyses and industry surveys. Her early consulting years were devoted to the development of retail site location models - a pioneering work in this field. Ms. Coman has participated in numerous feasibility studies for mass spectator and recreation-oriented facilities including stadiums, civic centers, convention/exhibition halls, OHV parks, theme parks, visitor centers and other public facilities. These studies involved recreational, cultural, and entertainment events. She has also developed techniques used to determine recreation needs and convert these to facility and. land requirements as input to the preparation of local and regional park master plans. Another of her areas of specialization is evaluation of financing techniques for recreation facilities. Her M.S. Thesis, Market Potential Estimation Models for Major Leamae Baseball, and a paper dealing with industrial land use absorption presented at the 1971 meeting of the Western Economics Associate in Vancouver, B.C. are examples of her publications PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: · Lambda Alpha (Honorary Land Economics Fraternity) National Association of Business Economists REFERENCES: Market Analysis and Master Plan Assessment Study for Dana Point Harbor Dana Point, CA Mr. Bob Hamilton Manager, Program Planning County of Orange/EMA- Harbors, Beaches & Parks 400 Civic Center Drive West Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 (714) 568-4965 CHRISTINE COMAN (continued) Parks and Master Plan Fremont, CA Recreation Comprehensive Ms. Amy Rakley, AICP City of Fremont 3350 Capitol Avenue Fremont, CA 94538 (510) 494-4363 Parks and Recreation Master Plan Diamond Bar, CA Mr. Bob Rose Director of Community Services City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909) 396-5694 Parks and Recreation Master Plan Laguna Niguel, CA Comprehensive Ms. Pam Lawrence Recreation and Administrative Director City of Laguna Niguel 27801 La Paz Road Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 (949) 362-4300 Services Parks and Recreation Master Plan Mumeta, CA Mr. Jim Hoiston Parks Supervisor, City of Murrieta 40600 California Oaks Road Mumeta, CA 92562 (909) 698-6746 X 12 SUSAN M. JONES EDUCATION: State Ut~iversiO' at Lot~g /3ec~c'h. (~.q EXPERIENCE: Ms. Jones was Recreation Superintendent fo,' the City alTustin From October 1985 to Jun<: 1995, when she left to become a Leisure Resource consultant. While employed by the City of' Tustin, she, managed the day to day operation of the City's Community Services Department. She administered an annual operating budget of$1 million with 14 full-time staff and 15 part-time seasonal program staff. The Department: generated $675,000 revenue in program and user fees each fiscal year. The office was fully' computer automated with software capabilities for registration and facility calendar management, word processing, desk top publishing, and spreadsheets~ Ms. Jones served as staff liaison to the Parks and Recreation Commission, Senor Advisory Board, and other City Council appointed committees and task forces. She conducted citizen's participation task forces to study community issues and :recommend solutions to City Council. The results of the work done by these groups included establishing al'~er-school day care programs at eve~ elementary schooi, free recreation and lunch programs for economically disadvantaged areas !~n the community, and a neighborhood community center primarily funded by the State's Healthy Start Grant Program She also provided staff support for the Tustit'~ Community Foundation, a 501c3 nonprofit corporation, managed the Department's Capital Improvement Program, and worked with citizens' committees to develop park and recreation Facility plans, and stage large community special events. She also serx.'ed on the Design Review Committee for the Tustin Ranch housing tract, a 2,000-acre master planned community with more than 56 acres of park land. While on this committee, she assisted with the processing of tract maps and monitored required park acreage to be dedicated by builders, as maps were processed to ensure that projects were in compliance with the City's Park Land Dedication (Quimby) ordinance. Prior to working for the City of Tustin, Ms. Jones was Recreation Supervisor for the City of Cypress Recreation and Park District. Research Network Ltd. and School Planning Services Proposal: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update/EIR PAMELA S. WOOLDRIDGE RESEARCH NETWORK LTD. EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS B.A., English California State University Fullerton, CA 1973 American Marketing Association Building Industry Association Building Industry Research Council Lambda Alpha 'Society EXPERIENCE SPECIAL SKILLS Research Network Ltd., President The Irvine Company, Manager, Marketing Research Walker & Lee Real Estate, Research Associate Survey Research Public Education Needs Assessments Residential Development Feasibility Studies Community Development Product Analyses RESPONSIBILITIES/QUALIFICATIONS Pamela Wooldridge brings to Research Network Ltd. broad experience in the consumer research, real estate feasibility and marketing fields. She possesses a variety of specialized skills not the least of which is the design and implementation of consumer research aimed at solving specific land use objectives. As Marketing Research Manager of The Irvine .Company for seven years, Ms. Wooldridge designed and implemented survey research programs on behalf of the Community Development Division of The Irvine Company as well as Irvine Pacific, an Orange County home builder. These programs included survey research among the resident population on the Irvine properties, among home shoppers as they visited new home model complexes, among new home buyers after move-in as well as compilation of research among apartment tenants. These programs were designed to support the land planning and product marketing efforts of all Irvine Company division Marketing Directors. As President of Research Network Ltd. since 1982, Ms. Wooldridge has utilized her skills in survey research to poll resident population bases to address the specialized needs of the public sector as well as non-real estate private sector clients. In particular, Ms. Wooldridge has developed and implemented resident needs assessments for such services as parks and recreation, transportation planning, economic development, child care, and public education throughout Cal:ifornia. Such needs assessments take advantage of her background in demographic analysis, land development, as well as consumer research to provide intuitive and actionable results for' many public and private sector clients. Ms. Wooldridge's most: recent project-s.~)ecific experience includes: Resident surveys aimed at understanding public service expectations for municipalities such as the Cities of Laguna Hills and Highland. Random sample surveys of resident I~ousehoids in the Cities of Fremont, Sacramento, Chino Hills, Chula Vista, Highland, Laguna Hills, Stockton, San Bernardino, Temecula and Upland, California, to establish public service usage and attitudes. Three surveys of Antelope Valley residents aimed at ur~derstanding the composition of the labor force and its commutation patterns. The design and implementation of multiple survey efforts on behalf of The Irvine Company studying the resident and employee populations of tile City of Irvine to assess housing, public service, and child care needs of the community. A comprehensive survey of Tustin Ranch residents was conducted on behalf of the Tustin Unified School District to form the basis for projections of public school enrollment and future school facilities needs. More than 3,800 resident households of San Diego County were polled recently on behalf of the County of San Diego. The thrust of these interviews was the assessment of current behavior, attitudes and needs for bicycle facilities. The Santa Margarita Company, developers of one of Orange County's premier planned communities engaged Research Network Ltd. to prepare a random survey of its recent new home purchasers to compile information for use in decisions for housing design, community services, and finance of a new planned community. We designed and implemented a series of intercept surveys among customers at various Pacific Theaters movie sites throughout Southern California. The thrust of the surveys was to profile the consumers based on their age, income, and ethnicity and to design a trade area surrounding each theater site based on survey respondents home addresses. Management of a Southern California chain of restaurants has come to Research Network Ltd. to perform both customer intercept and focus group recruiting efforts aimed at assisting in the improvement of restaurant menu, services, and sales. RESCON9/97 7. Resxo?Tes MBA Proposal.' Rancho Cuo~monga General Plan Update/EIR EDUCATION M.S., Wildland Resource Science (Specialt3' in \Vildhfe), Umversitv of California, Berkelev BS., Foresto,, University of Cahforma, Berkeley Professional Affiliations / Certification 'Iqne Wildhie Society National Institute fbr Urban \Vildlife Habitat Evaluation Procedures (I-fEP) Certified Endangered Species Section 10(a) Survey Pernut for the endangered Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus 1ongimembris pacificus) PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Michael Brandman Associates - Manager of Biological Resources/Senior Scientist CiD~ of Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation - \Vildlife Biologist CH2M Hill - Terrestrial Ecologist Environmental Science Associates Senior Wildlife Biologist Biosystems Analysis - \Vildlife Biologist/Field Biologist \VESCO - Field Biologist Envirodyne - Field Biologist Geysers Geothermal Wildlife Study - Field Biologist GREGG MILLER MANAGER OF BIOLOGICAL SERVICES/SENIOR SCIENTIST Mr. Mfiler has more than 22 years of experience as a wildlife biologist and terrestrial ecologist. Tl~is includes conducting w~ldlife surveys, wildhie habitat ewiluations, populanor~ studies, and nnpact analvses. Mr. *liller has a broad range of knowk:dge about many v, aldlife species, their habitat relations and toteractions, and the interactions betxveen human activmes, wildlife and wildhie habitat His experience includes assessing v,4,ldlife habitat, conducting trapact analyse:s, devek:>p~ng mitigation, preparing EIRs and EISs in accordance with NEP.L. ('2t!:X~A~ and [i:ndangered Species Laxvs, mana~ng projects and staff for wildlife an~d vegeram:m :surveys, and report preparation, and conducting surveys for endangered species..'is Senior Scientist at MBA, Mr. Miller directs MBA's Natural Resore:res Department, manages projects, provides senior level re,sew of reports., and maintains quality control. PROFESSIONAl., EXPERIENCE Conducted wiM]hfe field surveys, assessed wildlife habitat, conducted impact analyses, devek>ped mitigations, prepared EIRs and EISs in accordance with NEPA, CEQA, and Endangered Species Laws, managed projects and staff for wildlife and w:getation surveys, and report preparation, and conducted surveys for endangered species including kit fox, Tipton kangaroo rat, salt marsh harvest mouse,. and pe=egrine falcon for the U.S. Fish and \Vildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, California Natural Diversity Data Base:, and other agencies.. Conducted habitat evaluation, small mammal trapping, raptor counts, and bird censusing in Cal:ifomia's Central Valley to assess impacts of proposed coal-fired power plant. Mammal trapping focused on the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse. Collecte:d and interpreted deer data for PG&E's Crane Valley Hydroelectric Project relicer'~smg, including computer modeling of deer herd populations. Conducted endangered species surveys for Tipton and Fresno kangaroo rats, kit fox, bhmt-nosed leopard hzard, tricolored blackbird, western pond tartie, and red-le.gged frog. Conducted raptor surveys and wildlife habitat analysis. As field biologist for U.S. ][;'orest Service, surveyed birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and vegetat:ion in old growth forests in SLx Rivers National Forest, Cahforma. Surveys conducted were part of the U.S. Forest Service Habitat Relationship Program to assess relationships between logging and other management activities and wildlife resources. Directed habitat assessment fbr the federally endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly near Lake Forest in a 20-acre unincorporated portion of Orange Cotm~'. The project also included rare plant surveys. Mr. Miller is preparing a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the federally endangered Delhi sand. s flower-loving fly (DSF) t'or a project in Rialto, California. l-.{e is also supervising development of the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project and the HCP. Mr. Miller has consulted with USI%VS on the project; and worked with the project proponent and the proponents engineers and legal consultant for the project in developing the HCP. When finally approved the HCP will allow development of a 96-acre parcel and aid co~aservanon of the DSF bv dedication land fbr the conservation of DSF. 2GBM99 EDUCATION M.S., Cahfornia State University FullerIon - Environmental Policy and Planning BA., Hofstra Universi~,, Hempstead, NT.- Economics PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Michael Brandman Associates, Environmental Planner Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Real listate Management Specialist Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), Asset Specialist STEVEN H. SMITH ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER Mr. Smith h:ts an extensive real estate background involving: environmental analysis, f~nancml analy:s~s, propert)- management, and disposition. He also has a thorough knowledge of environmental pohcy, planning, and regulations. iDemonstrated abihtv :o coordinate, analyze, and fac~.htate complex financial transact/ohs. E, xperience managing and ~mplementmg government service contracts. Mir. Smith ts highly smiled in various database, spreadsheet, word processing, and graphic computer software applications. PROFESSIONAl,, EXPERIENCE Assisted m the preparanon of an EIR for the Anahema Area Master Land Use Plan located m lhe City of Anahezrn. The project sets forth a comprehensive development program to enhance and remtalize an approximately 800-acre area encompassing The Edison International Field of Anaheim. The project would alh:)w development of the :site under a Zoning Overlay that would allow a total development of appro:'dmately 13.3 milton square feet of office, retail, and hotel uses. The prmaary issues involved with the proiect include traffic, land use:, air quality, noise, drainage, and public senfces. Assisted tlie preparation of an addendum to an EIR analyzing the impacts of an Area Plan for a major housing development in southeastern Orange Count. Assisting m the management of a 94-1ot residential subdivision in the Ciu, of Fullerton. The project site encompasses 35 acres and is part of the East Coyote Hills Specific l?lan. 2q~e project requires a specific plan amendment, zone change., developrnent agreement, and a tentative tract map approval. The pmna.D" issues associated w~th the project include land use compatibility,, construction air emissions, landslides, oil v-ell sites, and biological resources. Assisted in the preparation of an EIS/EIR for the Norco Bluffs Stabilization project along the Santo Ana River in the Cid' of Norco. The project includes the stabilization of the bluff toe as well as stabilization of the bluff slope. Primav:' issues involved include biological resources, water resources, land use and recreation, a:ir quality, and noise. Assisted in the preparat:ion of an EIS for the Prado Dam Water Conservation and Supply Study. The project included the r,'fising of the water impoundment level behind Prado Dam. Primary issues associated with the project included biological resources (i.e., least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher), water resources., and land use/recreation. I)eveloped anti implemented a hydrological survey program to monitor surface and near-surface water resources during the construction of the Department of Water and Power's (DWP) HollDvood Reservoir Improvement Project. Provided U.S :~rrny Corps of Engineers (USACE) alternative analysis accompanying an individual permit application reqmred for the completion of the Antonio Park~vay. Performed survey and provided a ventten report detailing biologically related impacts anticipaled from the implementation of the City of Corona's Water and Selvage System Master Plan. 2SHS99 EDUCATION M.S., Geography, Portland State Universiu, BA., Geography, Cahfi>rnia State Universiu', Northridge PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS 3_ssociation of American Geographers Association of Pacific Coast Geographers Urban Regional Information Systems Association American Planrung Association Association of Environmental Professionals PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Sfichael Brandman Associates Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation Washington Count- Surveyor's Office Metro Data Resource Center (in conjunction with Portland State Universi~,) Mr. Hood National Forest - Fishedes/Biological Technician Pacific Corp. Automated Facility,- Points Records Project Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Point Reyes National Seashore (in conjunction with the Student Conservation Association) PAULETTE WILLS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER Ms. \%11s is :m enmronmental planner with experience in natural resources management am.t Geographic Infor~nanon Systems. She has a strong background m GIS apphcanons and methodolo~es m natural resource management, enmronmentat planning, and su~'eying. Her professional experienc:e crosses into both the public and private sectors. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (2urrently ass~st:mg in the preparation of an EIR for the Sierra Vmeyards Specific Nan EIR in Fontana, Cahfornia. ~e project includes 882 single-G~y res~denmd units, a 40-a.cre retml center, a 10-acre neighborhood park, and a resets, anon of land for an elemental- school. Currently using GIS to ass/st in the preparation of the Las Virgenes Mmficipal Water District Siream Avoidance Study EIR. This is a programmatic EIR that analyzes the eft~c:ts of alternate discharge locations for treated water originating from the Tapia Water Reclamation Facility. GIS is being used as a tool in the environmental impact analysis of alternate discharge locations in the Stream Avoidance Study. Used GIS to analyze the impacts on biological habitat by the various alternatives in the Prado Dam Water Consetw-ation and Supply Study ElS. The (;iS analysis included the mapping of biological habitat in Prado Basin, calculation of at!!~i~cted habitat acreage at five elevations of inundation, and map product:ior~. Assisted in the preparation of the Prado Dam Water Supply and Conservation Study EIS. 'I~.is project included the environmental analysis of five alternatives that related to vau,'ing levels of inundation in Prado Basin. Currently assism:~g in the preparation of an EIR for an AutoNation USA development m Bald,a&~ Park, Cahfornia. The project involves the development of an automobile dealership in an urban area that has been designated for redevelopment. Minaaged the preparation of the Oak Park Joint Use Replacement LibraW Negative Declaration in Oak Park, California. The project involves the construction of a pub[it libra~ that will be utilized by the Oak Park Unified School District and the CounD' of Ventura. The single-story libra~ site encomp:asses 10,000 square feet and the project includes a parking lot, driveway and lefi...hand mm lane. Assisted in the preparation of the Northeast Bakersfield Bike Path and Water Facilities Envkomnental Impact Report ~IR) and Environmental Assessment (EA). "l~e project mw:)tves the construction of a bike path, water treatment plant, high amt low [ift pumping stations, raw and potable water pipelines, intake structure and reservoir. The purpose of the project is to supply potable xvater to the northeast Bakersfield area from the Kern River. 2PRW99 SENIOR EDUCATION B.S., Cid' and Regional Planning, Ca[ifi:>rnia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispc PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Insritute of Cernfied Planners (AICP) American Planrang Associauon Association of Environmental Professionals PROFESSIONAL HISTORY ~hchael Brandman Associates CiD~ of Pismo Beach Planning Department City of San Luis Obispo C omrnuniD- Development Department 1MICHAEL E. HOULIHAN, AICP PROJECT MA:NAGER/MANAGER OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Mr. [.touhhan has ~nore than 14 years of experience prepanng environmental documentation :,red perforrning planning sm~es m Cahfornia. He has managed preparagon of vanous EIRs Gr small-scale commercial developments, large research parks, hillside developments, landfGs, and other mfrastmcture-u'pe fitcilitie:s. lie h:as managed and prepared a vanen' of EAs, ran~ng from transit tmprovements to General Plan studies, in ad~non to mana~g NEPA/CEQA doctm~cnts fi::)r water-related projects (conse~a~on, conveyance, etc.). His expertise inch.~des management, preparation and processing of environmental doc:umcnts, [and use compaob~' analyses, shade and shadow analyses, traffic,/circulat:ion analyses, hydrolo~~ and water quahD' assessments, and assessments of public sea'ices and u~' pu~'eyors. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Managed the preparam:m of an EIR for 380-acre mixed-use development for the Cid, of Rancho Cucamonga. The primary project approvals analyzed in the EIR were a General Plan amendment, Specific Plan amendment, Specific Plan, and zone change. 'Ilae project included a mix of golf course/recreational, hotel conference center, retail, restaurant and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and hght industrial. These mix uses centered around an 18-hole public golf course. Managed the p,:eparam:m of an EIR for a mixed-use project for the City of Irvi.ne. The primal' project approval addressed in the EIR was a zone change to allow a ma.ximum of 4,050 residences; approximately 5 million square feet of commercial, industrial, and institutional uses; and an 18-hole public regulation golf course within approx/mately 1,200 acres. The buildout of the project was esnmated to take 15 t 25+ years. Managed the p, repararion of an EIR tbr a proposed Warehouse-style Retail Merchandising Center in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The proiect '~vould allow the addition of a Big Box retail use as a conditional use in the Industrial Park Classification for properties with frontage along Fourth Street. The prolect included approximately 845,000 square feet of commercial use on 71'3 acres within Subarea 12 of the CiU, of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial 3_rea Specific Managed the preparatio:a of an EIR for a 738-acre research park for the Santa Maria Public District (California). 'I]~e research park included 315 acres of light industrial, I8 acres of professional/commercial office, 18 acres of neighborhood commercial, 65 acres of :firport service, 42 acres of open space, and 281) acres of golf:' course uses. 'I]~e project included General Plan Amendments (lan.d use and circulation), zone change, specific plan, planned development permit, conditional use permits, and a development agreement. Managed the preparation of' an EIR t~)r a 759-acre residential communi~ in the Ci~ of Bakersfield. ~D~e residential commumw inchided 2,952 single family residences, 292 mtfifiple family units, 255,000 square I~et of commercial uses, and 10 acres of' open space. The project included a General Plan Amendment, zone change, and an amendment to the Kern River 1521ement Plan. 2MEH99 EDUCATION Ph.D., Umversitv of California, Santa Barbara M.A., Universit), of Califorma, Santa Barbara B.3,., Swarthmore C'ollege, Pennsylvania LAUREN WEISS BRICKER, PH.D. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN Dr. Br'~cker has over I 5 rears expenence m dae identification, evaluation, and managcment of hlsto,:~c resources. She is the principal of an architectural history consul[ting firm w~tid'l performs architectural/historical assessments of properties m both northern and southern California. Her techmcal experuse include:s lustore: landmark assessments, architectural surveys, federal Section 106 and state CKQA compliance, and }-LkBS/HAER documentation. PROFESSIONA.I.. EXPERIENCE .Managing mumcipal and cotnan- projects in wMch historic resources were researched and evaluated in order to meet CEQA requirements. Clients have included: - CiD' of F'ontana - C~' of Santo Barbara - City of Santa Monica - CiD' of C)c:eanside. - CitD' of Pasadena - Ci~ of ¥"icton,~e CiD' of San Francisco -- CiD' of Chino - Corem- of Santa Barbara - County of San Bernardino - County of Riverside Perfi~rmed arc}m:ecmral survey of 4,400 buildhags located within a San Francisco neighborhood, foLiowing the gradelines established by the U.S. Depamnent of the Interior and the California Office of Historic Places including Fort Macz~.rthur, Middle Reservation, and San Pedro. Has performed arclfitecmral surveys and/or Section 106 historic re~qews for historic structures or 'districts in Pasadena, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Fontana, Redlands, Ctfino, and Victorville. Preparecl National Register nomination packages for the Cities of Santa Monica, West' Hollywood Redlands, San Francisco, and San Pedro, and the Counw of Riwerside. Authored numerous scholarly pubhcations and public reports on California arcl~fitecrure and city planmug. Instructed courses on the histor5' of architecture at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the Southern CaJ. iforma Institute of Architecture. Member of the California Preservation Foundation, Socie~ of Architectural Historians, Foundation for San Francisco's Architectural Heritage, and the Redlands C. onservancy. 2LWB99 EDUCATION B.S. in Pubhc Affairs, Indiana UniversiD' - Concentration in Enmronmental Science and Management Minor in Biolo~' Professional Affiliations Cahforma Native Plant Socieu', Orange County Chapter Society for Ecological Restoration, California Chapter (SERC3_L) Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden at Claremont PROFESSIONAL HISTORY ~hchael Brandman Associates Impact Sciences, Inc. Roznowski Biological Services JMS Environmental Associates, Ltd. LARISA A. ROZNOWSKI PROJECT ECOLOGIST Ms. Roznowsklt has ::, background in public affinrs and ecology and wnrh a concenrranon m field biolo~'. Her pnnciple role is as a field biologist ~th survey expenm]tce and biologqcal documenta~on preparation experience m a variety of southern Cahforma habitats. Her experience includes conducting biological assessments, biolo~cal constraints analyses, and juhs&c~onal permit revtews fi.)r varmus types of projects. In addinon, she has perfo~ed various fbcused botanicaI and x~dhfe sun'eys as we~ as biolo~cal momtonng se~qces on ecol,t)~cal restoration and habitat mi~gation projects. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Analyzt:d exastmg bioh::)gncal resource conditions and project impacts and developed ramgallon measures for a 400-acre proposed development m northern Riverside County~ Perfi3rmed a biologicai assessment including vegetation mapping, sensitive biological resource mapping, and sensitive species focused survey recommendations ~Br a 65-acre site which involved coastal sage scrub, cottonwood/x~llow riparian, and brittlebush scrub plant communities near the city of I,ake Elsinore in Riverside County. Managecl restoration efforts for a cardoon eradication program in southern Orange County. Conducted qualitative and quantitative field surveys, provided remedial recommendations based on specific success criteria, and produced annual reports for resource agency review. Conduc:ted quantitative stmreys and annual reports for coastal sage scrub, native grassland, and riparian scrub restoration sites for a development project in southern C)range Count'?. Participated m 2.1-acre vernal pool restoration monitoring and maintenance program at Fairview Park in Costa Mesa. Conducted floral sampling and inwmtories of rare species, coordinated restoration efforts, and produced annual restoration monitoring reports~ Conduc:ted rare iplant surveys near Lake Forest in a 20-acre unincorporated portion of Orange Courtly to assess presence or absence for a variety of coastal sage: scrub and cb:iparral plant species including Braunton's milkyetch, Nevin's barber~,', intermediate mariposa lily, and sticky dudleya. Performed habitat assessment for the federally endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly. Participated m conducting directed surveys for the federally threatened California gmatcatcher for private developer in the City of Rancho Palos Vetdes. Morntoted breeding activines and behavior of resident gnatcatcher pairs throughout the nesting season on an approxanately 23-acre site and commumcated findings I:o U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Prepared prehmina~ text and planm~g palette for habitat nufigafion and monitoring plan. for willow riparian scrub habitat located in Peter's Canyon in Orange Co~mtv. 2LAR99 EDUCATION Graduate study, M.A. in Urban and Regnonal Planning, Universiu: of Cahfornia, Los Angeles M.S. (in progress), Environmental Studies, Califorma State Urnversify, Fullerton B.A., Urban Geography, Califorma State Universiu', Fullerton PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Amehcan Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals (Orange Count, Chapter President) PROFESSIONAL HISTORY N[ichael Brandman Associates JASON M. BRANDMAN SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER Mr Brandmat~ Is an experienced proiect ~nanager specializing m planning, environmental :trapact assessment, and public pohcy analysis vAth an m depth understanding of issues related to the use and storage of hazardous materials and their pole;real contaminanon capabilines. His 10 years of experience include the m,magement of and analysis for EIRs, EISs, EAs, Specific Plans, and water and wastewater resource studies. He has worked on projects ranging from malor regiomd transportanon corridor and utiliD' transnussion line studies, to residetmal, commercml, and industrial developments. I-{e has also worked on state correctional ~acihties projects, and site-specific hazardous materials investigations. ['te is an expert m land use studies and aesthetic/visual analysis, as well as traffic/circlAation, geolo~', hydrology, public senfces and utilities, hazardous materials, and c:ulmral resourc:es studies. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Managing the preparat/on of the Anaheim Stadium Master Land Use Plan (~ff. AJP) EIR :m the Ci~~ of Anaheim, California. The proposed project includes the preparation of a MLUP and Master EIR for the development of an ap,proximately 640-acre area surrounding, but not inclusive of, the Anaheim Stadium property'. The project will include the completion of planning documents that will guide development of the greater Stadium Area through detailed zoning standards and design guidelines. The MLUP will also includes a maste~: landscape plan, streestscape program, idenfi~ program, and public factlilies plan. :\ full range of environmental issues are being addressed. Managed the prepafar/on of the Sportstown Anahema EIR, which included the renovation of the existing 16,000-space parking area to include 14,000 ohsire spaces, off, ire parking to accommodate major sporting events, construction of a new stadium (70,500 seat; football stadium), and the renovation of the existing Anaheim Stadim'n for the sole purpose of baseball (net increase of). Sportstown also included 750,0(}0 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, 250,000 square' feet of office space, a relocafion of the existing 150,000 square feet of temporary ex.hibition space to permanent facilities, 500 hotel rooms, and a reconfiguration of the 16,000-space parking area. As part of preparation of the EIR, a series of public: meetings, etc.) on the project were conducted to educate and obtmu input from the: public using graphic tools to depict both the process of preparing thte envircmmental document and the land use plan for the project. Managed the preparation of the Dos Vientos Specific Plan 9/XrI'T 4963 Subsequent EH{, whic:h included the development of 584 residential units, open space parcels, a public park, regional detention and retention basins, and a private equestnan cer~ter. The project also included the development of a varietT of water features that would provide potable water to the proposed residents (30(),000 gallon reservoir, etc.) and flood control features to ensure adequate flood protection to residential and ancillary, (parks, etc.) structures onsite Assisted in managtng the preparation of a master EIR for the Anaheim Resort Area Specific Plan. The study area encompasses approximately 1,040 acres in south..central Anahein'~ and includes such notable commercial and recreational features as Disneyland and the Anaheim Convention Center. The EIR provided a thorough analysis of potentiM environmental effects associated with a comprehensive land use plan for the Resort Area and was coordinated with proposed plans for a major expansion of Disneyland. 2JMB99 THOMAS J. MCGILL, PH.D. DIRECTOR OF RESOURCES MANAGEMENT EDUCATION Ph.D., Genetics, UniversiD' of California M.A., Ecolo~', UniversiD' of California B.A., Biology, Harvard Umversitv PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member of CaLifornia Bar, 1990 PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Tetra Tech, Inc. The Earth Technology Corporation U.S. Navy,, Head Environmental Management U.S. Navy, Biologist I)r. McGdl hats over 20 years of experience in managing environmental and natural and c:uln.mfi ,:esources programs. He has broad experience ~n the preparation of c:onse,:'vanon and land use management plans, natural and cuk'ura[ resou:rces ma:nagement plans, and endangered species management plans; biological field inventories and preparation of technical reports; and the development and in~plementation of enxdrom'nental compliance programs for PCBs, underground storage tanks, air quality, hazardous material and waste, and groundwater. tf~is experience also includes extensive coordination with most federal,. state and local environmental regulators. PROFESSIONAl.. iEXPERIENCE Assisting in ~;h.e management of the preparation of Environmental Documentatio~'~ fbr the Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Slaps for the Brown- Judsor~ Family Properties m ILiverside Count,. The project is a specific plan for a proposed golf course commumty and four separate "in-fill" properties in the c omm~mity o f Highgrove. Assisting in the management of the preparation of an Environmental Impact Re:port i~:)r the Glen Helen Specific Plan. The County, of San Bernardino initiated the Specific Plan for 3,400 acres (Located near the Interchange of the 1-15 and I--215 Free~vays in the Unincorporated area of San Bernardino Cotrot3'). Directing the management of preparation of a Initial Study/Negative Declaration fi:)r the proposed school at the comer of Magnolia and Harwll Lane in Riw~rside County for the Alvord Unified School District. Managed the preparation of a comprehensive land use management plan and environmental n-npact statement for the Naval :kit Weapons Station China Lake. Tasks mctuded preparing several other subordinate management plans including a Natural Resources Management Plan, a Cultural Resources Management Plata, a Public involvement Plan, and Range Management Plan. Managed the preparauon of three environmental impact statements for closing ;Vir Forc:e bases. Issues addressed included: endangered species, wetlands, cultund resources, compatibility of land uses, recreational uses, air quality, noise, public services/access,, utilities, hazardous wastes, and traffic/circulation. Managed the preparation of an environmental impact statement ~br the relocation of E..2 aircraft for the NaW. Issues addressed included: endangered species, wetlands, cultural resources, compatibility, of land uses, recreational uses, air quality, noise., punic services/access, utilities, hazardous wastes, and tnfffic/circulation. Managed the preparation of an environmental impact statement tbr the constrt~ction of a lew,r in wetland habitat for the U.S. Marine Corps. Issues addressed included: endangered species, wetlands, flood plains, cultural resources including b_istoric properties, air quality, noise, public services/access, utilities, hazardous wastes, and traffic/circulation. 2TJM99 Appendix A. Supplemental Qualifications The Planning Center Stanley R. Hoffman & Associates CLIENT LIST 1993 - 1999 PUBLIC County of Riverside City of Orange County of ('.)range City of Oxnard City of Huntington Beach City of Fontana City of Laguna Niguel City of Upland City of Indian Wells City of Cathedral C:ity City of Calabasas City of Hesperia County of Sonoma Tulare County Public Works County of Merced City of Temecula City of Fullerton County of San Bernardino City of Indio City of South Pasadena City of Pasadena City of Perris City of Clovis City of Redlands County of Los Angeles Works Department Town of Tmckee City of Coachella. City of Santa C!arita Town of Yucca Valley City of Gardena City of Diamond Bar City of Chula Vista City of Palm Springs City of Dublin City of' Calistoga Los Angeles Community Redeveloprnent Agency City of Compton City of Santa Ana City of Newport Beach City of Inglewood Redevelopment Agency City of South E1 Monte City o:f Baldwin Park Caltrans PRIVATE The Irvine Company' Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc. Terry A. Hayes Associates RRM Design Group Thomas Reid Associates Topping Jacquess Consultants Valley Research and Planning Assoc. Keith International 4S Kelwood General Partners Lytle Creek Land and Resources The Arroyo Group Lettieri-Mclntyre and Associates Crawford, Multari & Clark Associates Landmark Land Company Hughes Aircraft Corporation The Wait Disney Company Faith Community Church Lowe Enterprises Crowder & Watt The Cowell Foundation The Planning Network Hightower Associates Michael Brandman Associates The Planning Center Koll Real Estate Group Chambers Group Irvine Community Builders Coastal Community Builders Irvine Retail Properties Company South Coast Metro Center LSA Inland Planning Group Bixby Old Ranch Company Aspen Environmental Group Sedway Kotin Mouchly Group Impact Sciences KSL Properties Ford Motor Land Development Corp. County of El Dorado Builders Exc. Hofer Ranch Cotton/Beland/Associates Bergman Companies Torino Holding Company Knowleton Communities Limoneira Company EIP SRHA Stanley FL Hoffrr~n Associates FISCAL, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE LOCATIONS Los Angeles Office 11661 San Vicente Boulevard Suite 104 Los Angeles, Califomia 90049 (310) 820-2680 phone (310) 820-8341 9'hx srha~pacbell.net Bay Area Office 238 Ennismore Court Alameda, California 94502 (510) 522-1129 phone (510) 5224701.[ar FEE SCHEDULE Principal: Senior Staff: Support Staff: $140 per hour $80-$100 per hour $50 - $60 per hour SRHA Stanley FL Hc~man Associates FISCAL, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SERVICES RKJK & Associates RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS TRANSPORTATION MODELING Imperial County Transportation Model Town of Mammoth Lakes Transportation Model Aliso Viejo Subarea Traffic Model Huntington Beach General Plan Update Traffic Model Saddleback Area Circulation Study Traffic Model Santa Ana River Crossings Cooperative Study Traffic Model Santa Margarita Subarea Traffic Model Beaumont Area Traffic Model/Analyzer Desert Area Traffic Model (Washington StreeUl-10 Interchange PSR) Desert Hot Springs West Study Area Buildout Traffic Model Indio Traffic Model Lake Elsinore General Plan Traffic Model Lakeview/Nuevo Specific Plan Scenario Traffic Model Menifee Area Traffic Model Moreno Valley Traffic Model North Murrieta Traffic Model Ramona Expressway Corridor Traffic Model Rancho Mirage Traffic Model Southwest District Traffic Model Van Buren Corridor Traffic Model Chino Traffic Model Hesperia General Plan Traffic Model RSA 33 (Morongo Basin) Transportation Model East Chula Vista Traffic Model Ojai Traffic Model Highlands Ranch Community Traffic Model {Imperial County) (Mono County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange CounW) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside CounW) {Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Diego County) (Ventura County) (Douglas County, Colorado) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Cambridge Village Traffic Study Castle & Cooke Parcel Map 7394 Traffic Study International Trade & Transportation Center Traffic Study The Marketplace Traffic Impact Study West Kern Corp. Southwest Development Traffic Study Ague Dulce Vesting Tentative Tract. No. 50385 Traffic Study Airport Distributors Warehouse Traffic Study Central Plaza Traffic Study Claremont Commercial Project Traffic Study Claremont Court Traffic Study Heritage Village Senior Housing Project Traffic Study Peter J. Pitchess Honor Rancho Feasibility Study Traffic Analysis Pomona College Hahn Academic Building Traffic Study Pomona College Mall Traffic Study State Farm Insurance Site, San Dimas, Site Specific Traffic Study Avenue 9/SR-99 Freeway Commercial Traffic Study Mammoth North Village Specific Plan Mammoth Starwood Subdivision Traffic Evaluation (Kern County) (Kern CounW) {Kern County) (Kern County) (Kern County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles CounW) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles CounW) {Los Angeles County) (Madera County) (Mono CounW) (Mono County) 4 RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS (CONT'D) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (CONT'D) Bolsa Chica Traffic impact Analysis Cypress Texaco Gas Station Traffic Study Foothill Ranch Marketplace Traffic Study Irvine MPC Industries Traffic Study McGaw Business Center Traffic Study Mission Viejo Barbadanes Park Traffic/Parking Study Mission Viejo Country Club Center II Traffic Study Mission Viejo PA 12 Park Sites Traffic/Parking Study Mission Viejo Tract Map 12632 Traffic Study Ortega Rock Quarry Traffic Study Pepsi-Cola Pacific Park Facility Traffic Study Saddleback Meadows Growth Management/CMP Traffic Analysis University of California, Irvine Group Housing Traffic Study University of California, Irvine Parking Structure No. 2 Traffic Study Valley View/Lincoln Shopping Center Traffic impact Study Weir Canyon/La Palma Commercial Project Traffic Study Alessandro Village Traffic Impact Study Bear Creek Inn, CUP 3109 Traffic Impact Study Black Bench Ranch Traffic Study Church of Christ Focused Traffic Analysis Crestmore Materials Aggregate and Quarrying Facilities Traffic Study Desert Hospital Expansion Traffic Analysis Elsinore City Center Traffic Study Horsethief Canyon Ranch Traffic Impact Study MacLeod Commercial Palm Desert Traffic impact Study Murrieta Centre Plot Plan 11729 Traffic Impact Study Murrieta Highlands Traffic Analysis Murrieta North County Bank Traffic Impact Study Murrieta Springs Mall Traffic Mitigation Study Murrieta Valley High School Traffic Impact Study Noble Creek Traffic Study Ramona Expressway Center Access Study Silverhawk Townhomes Traffic Impact Study Sun City Palm Springs Tentative Tract Impact Studies Temecula Tent. Maps 24085, 24086, 25139 and 25408 Traffic Study The Vineyard PM 24031 Traffic impact Study Winchester Road ARCO AM/PM, Traffic Impact Study 711Eucalyptus Center, Parcel Map 11801 Traffic Study California Landings CMP Traffic Impact Analysis Chino Hills Harvest/Greening Development Traffic Study Chino Hills Tentative Parcel Map 13024 Traffic Study Fairfield Ranch CMP Traffic Impact Analysis Harry S. Truman Middle School Traffic Analysis Highland Central Commercial Site - Traffic Study Hofer Ranch (Ontario) CMP Traffic impact Analysis Lake Arrowhead TT Map 11142 ~ Traffic Study Rialto Airport S.P./Mid-Va~ley Landfill Traffic Study Sterling Downs PUD, Rincon Village Traffic Analysis Terracina Apartments at Redlands - Traffic Study 5 (San (San (San (San (San (San (San (San (San (San (San (San (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange ,County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange CounW) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) {Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Riverside County) {Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside CounW) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside CounW) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside CounW) {Riverside County) Bernardino CounW) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) Bernardino CounW) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) Bernardino CounW) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) RKJ:K RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS (CONT'D) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS {CONT'D) Victory(lie Motorsports Complex Traffic Impact Analysis Vintage Avenue/Jurupa Street (Ontario) Traffic Impact Analysis WAL-MART Center, Fontana - Traffic Study Las Vegas Boulevard/Diablo Drive Commercial Traffic Study MacDonald Ranch Traffic Evaluation Buffalo Drive/Washington Ave. Commercial Traffic Study Beazer Homes - Village of Craig Traffic Study Cheyenne Airpark Traffic Study Hometown Subdivision Traffic Study (San Bernardino (San Bernardino (San Bernardino (Clark County, (Henderson, (Las Vegas, (North Las Vegas, (North Las Vegas, (North Las Vegas, County) County) County) Nevada) Nevada) Nevada) Nevada) Nevada) Nevada) CIRCULATION PLANNING Desert Highlands Traffic Study Pacificana Specific Plan Traffic Study Rosedale Ranch Traffic Study Seven Oaks Traffic Study City of Norwalk Circulation Element Update Mammoth Redevelopment Plan Transportation Analysis Aliso/Wood Canyons Regional Park Traffic Study Boisa Chica' Area Traffic Improvement Program Dana Point Headlands Specific Plan Traffic Study El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Reuse Assessment Foothill Aliso Planned Community Traffic Study Foothill Ranch Planned Community Circulation Plan Imperial Highway (SR-90) Integrated Transportation Improvements Study Irvine Northwood 5 Traffic Study Saddleback Community Church Traffic Study Santa Ana Heights Traffic Analysis Westpark (irvine) Traffic Study Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study Borel Airpark Center Traffic Study Canyon Heights Specific Plan 272 Traffic Study City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element Update (1990) City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Traffic Analysis City of San Jacinto Circulation Element Update Easts(de Reservoir Recreation Areas Circulation/Access Studies Jurupa Community Plan, I-15 West Study Area Traffic Analysis Kohl Ranch Specific Plan Traffic Study La Laguna Estates Specific Plan Traffic Study Lake Edge Specific Plan Traffic Study Men(fee North Specific Plan 260 Traffic Analysis Murrieta Creek Crossings Phasing Analysis Olympus Golf Club Specific Plan 287 Traffic Study Palm Crest Specific Plan 292 Traffic Study Parris Downtown Specific Plan 'Traffic Study Quinta Do Lago (SP 284) Traffic Study Riverpark Specific Plan Traffic Analysis Riverside County Regional Equestrian Center Traffic Study (Los (Kern (Kern (Kern (Kern Angeles (Mono (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Orange (Riverside (Riverside (Riverside (Riverside (Riverside (Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside Riverside County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) CounW) County) County) County) County) County) County) County) CounW) County) County) CounW) County) County) County) 6 INC, RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS (CONT'D) CIRCULATION PLANNING (CONT'DI Sierra Collection Specific Plan/GPA Traffic Study Specific Plan 172 - Walker Basin Traffic Study Sycamore Creek Specific Plan Traffic Study Temecula Old Town Traffic Study Washington/I-10 Road and Bridge Benefit Program Traffic Analysis Winchester 1800 Traffic Study Winchester Hills Specific Plan Traffic Study City of Yucaipa Road Fee Program Traffic Assessment East Highlands Ranch Traffic Study Lytle Creek Specific Plan Traffic Study Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex Traffic Study San Bernardino Specific Plan 90-002 Traffic Study San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District Traffic Study Westgate Specific Plan Traffic Study El Dorado Ranch Circulation Plan Edgemont Ranch Traffic Study (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) San Bernardino County) San Bernardino County) San Bernardino County) San Bernardino County) San Bernardino County) San Bernardino County) San Bernardino County) (Pinal County, Arizona) (La Plata County, Colorado) TRANSIT PLANNING Bakersfield AMTRAK Station Traffic Analysis Dial-A-Ride Franchise Performance Study Mammoth Multi-Modal Transportation Plan Aliso Viejo Multi-Modal Circulation Plan Aliso Viejo PA 40 Public Transportation Assessment Aliso Viejo Public Transportation Study Mission Viejo Multi-Modal Terminal Location Study Mission Viejo PA 32 Public Transportation Assessment Plano Trabuco Transit Development Plan Route 91 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane PSR Traffic Projections Rialto Commuter Rail Station Traffic Analysis Public TranSit Expenditures/Funding Assessment (Kern County) (Los Angeles County) (Mono County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (San Bernardino County) (San Diego County) PARKING STUDIES Bakersfield Convention Center Parking Study American Instorage (El Segundo) Parking Analysis Barbadanes Park Parking Study Eastbluff School Parking/Traffic Evaluation High Park Parking Evaluation Irvine Inn SRO Koll Pacific Park Parking Study Marguerite Center Shared Parking Analysis Market on the Lake Parking Evaluation Meadowpark School Parking Lot Evaluation Mission Viejo Planning Area 12 Park Sites A, B & C Parking Study Monarch Beach Plaza Parking Study Roger Miller Ford Parking Study 7 (Los (Kern County) Angeles County) (Orange County) {Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange CounW) (Orange County) (Orange County) RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS (CONT'D) PARKING STUDIES (CONT'D) Saddleback Community Church Parking Management Plan Santa Margarita Plaza Parking Study Trabuco Hills Center Parking Study Westcorp II Parking Study Western Country Plaza Parking Study Senior Apartments Research (USA Properties) Rancho Cucamonga Stadium Parking Study (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange CounW) (Orange County) (Sacramento County) (San Bernardino County) PARKING FACILITY REVIEW AND DESIGN Chrisanta Office Building Parking Lot Redesign, City of Mission Viejo Meadowpark School Parking Lot Redesign Park Plaza, Aiiso Viejo Town Center Parking Lot Review University High School Parking Lot Revisions (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Bolsa Chica Trip Reduction Strategic Plan Burke Commercial Development TMA Capistrano Gateway Transportation Management Plan Foothill Ranch TSM Plan Talega - TSM Plan Orangecrest Plaza Trip Reduction Plan Preissman Property Specific Plan 246 TDM Plan (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange CounW) (Orange County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING Heart Hospital Noise Study International Trade and Transportation Center Noise Study Pacificana Acoustical Analysis Home Depot Noise Analysis Lancaster Veterans Home Final Noise Study Steam Street/Redondo Avenue Residential Project Final Noise Study Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5053 Noise Study Aliso Viejo Auto Retail Center Noise Study Aliso Viejo Golf Club Acoustical Analysis Chiles and Macaroni Grill Final Noise Study Coto de Caza Hunt Club Acoustical Analysis CUSD Trans. portation Center Noise Study Hellman Ranch Specific Plan Noise Study Imperial Highway and Fairmont Boulevard Overcrossing Noise Study Irvine Coastal Area Preliminary and Final Acoustical Analysis Kid's View Preschool Noise Study Kindercare Learning Center Acoustical Analysis Leisure World Noise Assessment Widening Moulton Parkway Lincoln Drive-In Theater Site Acoustical Analysis (Los (Los (Los (Los (Kern County) (Kern County) (Kern County) Angeles County) Angeles County) Angeles County) Angeles County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) 8 RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS (CONT'D) ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING (CONT'D! Market on the Lake Acoustical Study Northwood Tentative Tract 15382 Final Noise Study Olympiad Park Acoustical Study Plaza Bellogente Acoustical Analysis Saint Paul's Greek Orthodox Church Final Acoustical Study Taco Bell Acoustical Analysis Trabuco Hills Center Acoustical Study World Savings & Loan Acoustical Analysis California Avenue Noise Study Center Street Widening Acoustical Evaluation Domenigoni Valley Reservoir Noise Study Elsinore Hills Apartments Acoustical Study Greet Ranch Noise Study Hamilton Property Noise Study Highland Springs Resort Master Plan Noise Study Nutrilite Plant New Dehydrator Noise Impact Study Summit Heights Specific Plan Preliminary Acoustical Study Sun City Palm Springs Preliminary and Final Noise Studies Villa La Quinta Apartments Revised Acoustical Study Chino Hills Final Acoustical Study Los Serranos Commercial Center Final Noise Study Lytle Creek Project EIR Noise Assessment Tentative Tract 14652 Final Noise Study Town of Yucca Valley General Plan Program Noise Element Victorville Motorsports Complex Noise Study Albertsons Shopping Center Noise Impact Analysis Aviara Planning Area 5 Final Noise Study Mariners Point Noise Studies Old Coach Golf Estate Updated Noise Study Park View West Final Noise Study Rancho Penasquitos Tract Noise Study Sambi Housing Development Tentative Tract 92-02 Noise Study (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Diego County) {San Diego County) (San Diego County) (San Diego County) (San Diego County) (San Diego County) {San Diego County) TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SIGNING/STRIPING DESIGN 17th Street at Esplanade Signal Modification Aliso Viejo Assessment District Traffic Signal Barranca Pkwy. Widening, City of: Irvine City of Mission Viejo Assessment District Traffic Signals Imperial Highway - Birch Hills Mall, City of Brea Jeffrey Road at Roosevelt, City of Irvine Marina Hills Drive at Tropea Traffic Signal Design Medical Center Drive Striping Plan Michelson at University Dr., City of Irvine, Traffic Signal Modification Orangetree at Irvine Center Drive Signal Modification Portola Pkwy., Culver Dr. to Jeffrey Rd., Traffic Signal Designs Traffic Signal Modification Harvard Avenue at Warner Avenue Traffic Signals at VTTM 12632 9 (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) n_ KJL.K RKJK PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS (CONT'D) TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SIGNING/STRIPING DESIGN (CONT'D) University Drive at Mesa Road Traffic Signal Design Adams Street Signing and Striping Plan City of Perds0 Perris Blvd. Traffic Signals Crowne Hill-Butterfield Stage Road at Royal Crest Traffic Signal Design Gene Autry Drive Striping and Traffic Signal Plans Orangecrest Trautwein and Van Buren Traffic Signals Washington Street Striping Plan Chino Avenue Traffic Signal Designs (San Traffic Signal Design and Warrants for Baseline at Church Street (San Rancho Verde Off-Site Striping Plan (Orange County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) Bernardino County) Bernardino County) (San Diego County) TRAFFIC SAFETY AND IMPROVEMENT STUDIES Sierra Madre Sight Distance Analysis Tentative Tract 47467 (Glendale) Access Analysis Traffic Control for Lemon Avenue Starwood Subdivision Traffic Review Bolsa Chica Roadway Design Review Coto de Caza Traffic Evaluation Crossroads Shopping Center Shell Station John Wayne Airport Roadway Operations and Signage Modifications Marguerite Pkwy. at Oso Pkwy. Intersection Upgrade Evaluation Saddleback Community Church Access Road Stril~ing Plan Del Webb Palm Springs Bicycle Circulation Plan Jefferson Street/I-10 Interchange Concept Design Study Ramona Expressway, City of Perris Washington Street Realignment Traffic Analysis Greentree Blvd. at 7th St. & Vailes Center Dr. Intersection Review Rialto Gateway/Restaurant Row Access Study Denver St. at Clairemont Ave., City of San Diego Olivenhain Elementary School Traffic Assessment Pig Pico Dr. at Carlsbad Village Dr., City of Carlsbad (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Los Angeles County) (Mono County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (San Bernardino County) (San Bernardino County) (San Diego County) (San Diego County) (San Diego County) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Beach at Edinger Traffic Control Plan Chrisanta Reclaimed Water Pipeline Culver Dr. Undercrossing at AT&SF Railroad Plan Check Services Laguna Niguel Waterline Oso Parkway Traffic Control Plan Segerstrom at Bristol Traffic Control Plan Westminster Ave. Pipeline Perris Boulevard Traffic Control Plan Ramona Expressway Rehabilitation Traffic Control Plan Carlsbad Village at Pig Pico Traffic Control Plan Claremont at Denver Traffic Control Plan (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Orange County) (Riverside County) (Riverside County) (San Diego County) (San Diego County) RKJK PARTIAL CLIENT LIST BUILDERS/DEVELOPERS AMERICAN ASSETS, INC. ARVIDA CORPORATION BALDWIN COMPANY, THE BARRATT AMERICAN, INC. BEDFORD PROPERTIES BENNETT PROPERTIES BETHEL DEVELOPMENT CORP. BOURESTON DEVELOPMENT, INC. BRIGHTON HOMES BROOKSTONE DEVELOPMENT, INC. BUIE CORPORATION BURKE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA OAKS DEVELOPMENT CO. CASTLE & COOK DEVELOPMENT CORP. CHARISMA GROUP, INC. CITATION HOMES COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT COSCAN CALIFORNIA, INC. COTO DE CAZA COMPANY COUSSOUUS DEVELOPMENT CO. CROSSROADS DEVELOPMENT DELGAR PARTNERS DEL WEB8 CALIFORNIA CORP. DON WILSON DEVELOPMENT DO NAHUE 8CHRIBER EMERALD DEVELOPMENT FIRST CITY PROPERTIES, INC. FOCUS DEVELOPMENT FOOTlIIt.[. RANCH COMPANY F.C. IRVINE, INC. GATLINIBERGER DEVELOPMENT, INC. GOLDEN PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. GREAT AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CO. GROVE CORPORATION HARBOR CREST DEVELOPMENT HILLMAN F~OPERTIE~ WEST, INC. HUNTINGTON CAINTAL CORPORATION INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES INTERAMERICAN I~11LDER~ CORP. IRVINE COMPANY, THE JAMES MANLEY AND ASSOCIATES JOHNSON & JOHNSON DEVEL. CORP. KATHRYN G. THOMPSON DEVEL. CO. KAUFMAN AND BROAD KOLL COMPANY LEBANOFF4~ICKNIGHT DEVEL. GROUP LYON COMMUNITIES, INC. MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORP. MIS810N VIEJO COMPANY MUPZ)OCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 0 ~LL PROPERTIES PACIFIC GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT CO. PACIFIC LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT CO. PEACOCK RADAKER CORPORATION PREFERRED EQUITIES PRESLEY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PULTE HOME CORPORATION RAEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RANCON RNANO, AL CORPORATION RANPAC COMMUNITIES RECREATIONS GROUP OF COMPANIES REGIS HOMES RESCO ROBERTSON HOMES SANDERSON - J. RAY DEVELOPMENT SHERMAN COJCHANDIS SECURITIES CO. STANDARD PAClRC OF ORANGE COUNTY STERLING BUILDERS SUOBERRY PROPERTIES, iNC. SUN CAL DEVELOPMENT SUN PACIFIC TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES TMC TOLD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TOSS INTERNATIONAL, INC. TOZAI, INC. TRIAD PARTNERS TRIQUEST DEVELOPMENT U.S. SUNBELT DEVELOPMENT VSL ENTERR~SES WATT BUSINESS PROPERTIES WEST MA~ COMMEi~IAL BROKERAGE WESTERN NATIONAL PROPERTIES WESTERN SKYLINES DEVELOP. CORP. WOODCREST DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ADKAN E~IHE~ ALBE~ A. WE~ A~80ClATES ~C~TECT60~NGE A~O~AT~ E~, INC. ~L~ A A~CIATES, I~. ~~ C~i~NIA, INC. CALIFO~iA Cl~ iNC. C~TE~ RO~K ~NDSCA~ ~CH. CHAMB~S ~0~, INC. CH~ E~INEERI~, INC. CM E~INE~NG ASSOC~TES, INC. COUPON & A~OClATES ~OSBY AND A~OClATES CULBERTSON, ADAMS &ASSOC., INC. CYP, INC. DA~D TAUSSIG ANO ASSOC,, INC. EIP ASSOCIATES ENGINEE~ ~TU~S E~~ ~CTIVES E~ ~~ .~HITECT~E FLORIAN ~EZ ~IATES G~YNE~OGERS E~NE~ING GREINE~ I~. G~, ~, ~StER AND ALVES H~ ENGINEERS, INC. ~P ~D DESIGN HUNS~R A~ ~CIATES I~A~T SCIENCES JOHN ~TE~ ASSOCIATES J. L. WEBB ~1~ KE~H COMPAq, THE LIGHTFOOT ~NI~ GROUP, THE LO~ AND ~TES, I~. LPA, I~. L.D. KING, INC. M. ~N ~TECTS ~K~M & ~$OCIATES MICHEL ~N~N ASSOCIATES N~O~Y NOLTE AND ASSOCIATES ~P~I~ ~D ~SIGN SOL~IONS ~NG ~OCIATES, THE ~NG ~R, THE ~1~ CO~O~IUM, THE ~y ~$O~TES ~OJE~ ~SIGN CONSULTA~S ~OMAS AND ~80~ATES ~NPAC ENGINE~ING COR~TION RO~RT BEIN, WILU~ ~OST SO~H~NO E~NEERING T & B ~NNING TE~ NOVA T~NS-PACIFIC CONSULTA~S ~N DESIGN STUDIO URSAN ~SION PUBIC AGENCIES/iNSTITUTIONS CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRALIA SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY OF BEAUMONT CITY OF BUENA PARK CITY OF CHINO CITY OF CLAREMONT CITY OF CYPRESS CITY OF HESPERIA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF INDIAN WELLS CITY OF INDIO CITY OF IRVINE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY CITY OF MURRIETA CITY OF PALM DESERT CiTY OF PERRIS CITY OF NORWALK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE CITY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CITY OF TEMECULA CITY OF YUCAIPA TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY COASTMNE COMMUNITY COLLEGE COUNTY OF ORANGE DESERT HOSPITAL EAGLES NEST CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ENClNITA6 UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT IRVINE SCHOOL DI8TRICT JOAQUIN RANCH FACILITIES DISTRICT LA MONTE ACADEMIE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT (MWD) MURRIETA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POMONA COU.EGE RIVERSIDE CO. ECONOMIC DEV. CORP. RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORTATION DEPT. SADOLEBAC~ COMMUNITY CHURCH ST. PAUL'8 GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH SUNRISE PRESCHOOLS TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OTHER AIRPORTER INN HOTEL AL SHA~K.I.E CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT BRUNSWICK CORPORATION CH~N U.S.A., INC. CZ MASTER A~80CIATION KENNETH A. RUBY CONSTRUCTION CO. MERIT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO. NATIONAL RE~OI.IRCES GROUP, INC. NORTH COUNTY BANK PEPSI-COLA RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY SHELL OIL COMPANY SHIMIZU AMERICA CORP. SMART & RNAL SOUTHERN CALIF. PLANT GROWERS SOUTHSHORE PLUMBING, INC. U.S. STORAGE, INC. WYROCK, INC. RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. REFERENCES CITY OF IRVINE One Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92713 (949) 724-6456 Peter Hersch Timor Rafiq CITY OF CHINO Public Works Dept. 13220 Central Avenue Chino, CA 91710 (909) 627-7577 x307 Barry Dee CITY OF HEMET 450 E. Latham Avenue Hemet, CA 92543 (9091 765-2360 Juan Perez CITY OF RIALTO 150 South Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92376 (909) 820-2530 Clayton Cabrinha CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5582 Bruce Gilmer CITY OF MISSION VIEJO 25909 Pala, Suite 150 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (949) 582-2489 Dennis Wilberg Shirley Land CITY OF DANA POINT 33282 Golden Lantern Dana Point, CA 92629 (949) 248-3598 Bob Stacheiski CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1909) 477-2740 Jon Gillespie COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANS. DEPT. 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor Riverside, CA 92507 (909) 955-6767 Ed Studor MWD 350 S. Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA. 90071 (213) 217-7201 Dennis Majors Jim Henderson SOUTHERN CALIF. ASSOC. OF GOVTS. 3600 Lime Street., Suite 216 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 784-1513 Mike Ainsworth CITY OF PERRIS 170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite A Perris, CA 92570 (909) 943-6504 Habib Motlagh CITY OF iNDIO 100 Civic Center' Mall Indio, CA 92202 (760i 342-6500 Amir Modarressi UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Office of Campus & Environ. Planning 401 Berkeley Place, Suite 350 Irvine, CA 92715 {949) 856-7058 Richard Demerjian CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6411 Joe Kicak Ron Parks CITY OF YORBA LINDA 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, CA 92686 (714) 961-7170 Roy Stephenson CITY OF BEAUMONT 550 E. Sixth Street Beaumont, CA 92223 (909i 769-8520 Ernest Egger COUNTY OF ORANGE 300 N. Flower Street, 7th Floor Santa Ana, CA 92702 Harry Persaud-(714) 834-3669 CITY OF MURRIETA 26442 Beckman Court Murrieta, CA 92562 Ed McCoy - (909) 698-1040 CITY OF FONTANA 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 (909) 350-7629 Paul Balbach TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES P.O. Box 1609 Mammoth Lakes, Ca 93546 {619) 934-8983 Karen Johnston (Planning) Craig Tackaberry {Engineering) TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY 57090 29 Palms Highway Yucca Valley, CA 92284 (760) 369-6575 Shane Stueckle CITY OF RIVERSIDE 3900 Main Street Riverside, CA 92522 (909) 782-5515 Fran Dunajski Ron Mueller SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIAT- ED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAGI 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92401 (9091 884-8276 Ty Schuiling Robert Wirts RKJK .Earth Consultants International, Inc. TANIA GONZALEZ, RG, CEG Project Consultant PUBLICATIONS Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T., Drumm, P.L. and Buchiarelli, P., 1994, A paleoseismic investigation at the northern terminus of the Whittier Fault Zone, in the Whittier Narrows area, Rosemead, California: Technical Report to the Southern California Earthquake Center. Mathewson, C.C., Gonzalez, T., and Eblen, J.S., 1992, Burial as a Method of Archaeological Site Protection, Contract Report EL-92-1~ US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Bausch, D., Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T, Dolan, J.... and S:ieh, K., 1992, Application of New Developments in Seismic Hazard Assessment Revised SafEty Element of the General Plan, City of Santa Monica, California: Abstracts with Prog:rams, 1992 Annual Meeting of the Association of Engineering Geologists, held in Long Beach, California, October 2-9, 1992. Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T., and Rockwell, T.K, 1992, Evaluation of the Late Quaternary Rate of Slip, Whittier Fault, Southern California:: U.S. Geoliogical Survey Final Technical Report, NEHRP Contract No. 14.-08--0001 ~G 1696, 24p. Gonzalez, T., Rockwell, T.iK., and Gatl~, E., 1992, Expk~ratory Excavations for Fault Investigations: Logging Techniques: Abstracts with Programs, 1992 Annual Meeting of the Association of Engineering Geologists, held in Long Beach, California, October 2-9, 1992. Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T., and Rockwell, 'T.I~ 1992~ Slip Rate of the Whittier Fault Based on 3-D Trenching at Brea, Southern California:: Abstracts with Programs, The Geological Society of America 88th Annual Cordilleran Sectiota v. 24~ no. 5, p. 26 Gonzalez, T., 1989, Appendix A: Interdisciplinary Bibliography on the Cultural, Physical, Chemical, and Biological Factors Affecting Archaeological Sites; in Mathewson, C. (ed.), Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Physical-ChemicabBiological Processes Affecting Archaeological Sites, Contract Report EL-89, U.S. Army Engineer Water Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gonzalez, T. and Rockwell, T.K., 1991, Hok~cene .Activity of the Springville Fault in Camarillo, Transverse Ranges, Southern California; Preliminary Observations; in Blake, T.F. and Larson, RA. (eds.), Engineering Geology along the Simi-Santa Rose Fault System and Adjacent Areas, Simi Valley to Camarillo, Ventura Count:y, Cali~brnia; Field Trip Guidebook of the 1991 Annual Field Trip, Southern California Section, Associatiou of Engineering Geologists, pp. 369-383. Mathewson, C.C., and Gonzalez, T., 1988, Protection and Preservation of Archaeological Sites through Burial; in Marinos, PG. and Koukis~ G.C. (eds.i~, Proceedings of An International Symposium on The Engineering Geology of Ancient W~:.~rks, Monuments and Historical Sites: Preservation and Protection: A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Vol. 1, pp. 519-526. ELDON GATH, RG, CEG Principal Geologist PUBLICATIONS Sanchez, P.E. and Gath, E.M., 1990, Hazard reduction in San Bernardino County: Technical Appendix to the Safety Element of the San Bernardino County General Plan; San Bernardino County Department of Regional Planning, 2 volumes, 430 p., 8 plates. Gath, E.M., 1992, Geologic hazards and hazard mitigation in the San Bernardino region; in Pipkin, B.W. and Proctor, R.J. (eds.), Engineering Geology Practice in Southern California; Association of Engineering Geologists, Southern Califi~rnia Section, Special Publication No. 4, p. 1-32. Bartie, D., Tarnall, T.S., and Gath, E.M.., 1992, Neotectonic uplift and ages of Pleistocene marine terraces, San Joaquin Hills, San Bernardino County, California; in Ehlig, P.L. and Steiner, E.A. (eds), Engineering geology field trips: San Bernardino County, Santa Monica Mountains, and Malibu; Association of Engineering Geologists, Southern California Section, 351h Annual Meeting, Guidebook and Volume, p. A55-A61. Bausch, D., Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T. Dolan, J., and Sieh, K., 1992, Application of new developments in seismic hazard assessment, revised Safety Element of the General Plan, City of Santa Monica, California; in Stout M.L. (ed), Proceedings of the 351h Annual Meeting, Association of Engineering Geologists, p.707.-713. Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T., and Rockwell, T.K 1992, Evaluation of the late Quaternary rate of slip, Whittier fault, soutlaern California; USGS Final Technical Report, NEHRP Contract No. 14-08- 0001-G1696, 24 p., numerous plates~ Gath, E.M., Gonzalez, T., Dramre, P.L, and Buchiaretli, P., 1994, A paleoseismic investigation at the northern terminus of the Whittier fault zone, in the Whittier Narrows area, Rosemead, California; Technical Report to the Southern C'aliforn:ia Earthquake Center, 37 p., numerous plates. Yogachandra, C., Bausch, D., Gath, E.M., and Haydem R. 1994, Techniques of liquefaction mitigation; Earthquake Engineering Research Institute., "Earthqnake Basics" series. [Twenty 35mm slides, 7- page text] Dolan, J.F., Sieh, K., Rockwell, T.K.~ Yeats, R.S., Shaw, J., Suppe, J., Huftile, G.J., and Gath, E.M., 1995, Prospects for larger or more frequent earthquakes in the San Bernardino metropolitan region; Science, v. :267, p. 199-205. Purkiss Rose- RSI Landscape Architecture PERSONNEL AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE Purkiss Rose-RSl Landscape Architecture, Recreation and Park Planning is a full service landscape architectural firm providing professional services to public agencies. The firm has individuals of diverse backgrounds and the requisit~e enthusiasm to provide for our clients the best product possible. Below is an outline of our corporate structure. Senior Principal: Steve Rose: I~ndscape Architect, Administrator Principals: Steve Lang: Jim Pickel: Landscape Architect; Recreation and Park Planner Production Manager~ Project Manager Consultants: Chris Coman: Susan Jones: Socioeconomic/Need Analysis Specialist .Leisure Resources Specialist Technical Staff: Dominic Oyzon: Carl Garcia: Oscar Johnson: Blake Warner: Rudy Hernandez: Ana Hemon: Jeffery Khun: Jason Lee: Matilde Reyes: Landscape Architect, Recreation and Park Planner Project Caption/Cadd Operator Project Caption/Cadd Operator Project Caption/Cadd Operator Cadd Operator" Cadd Operator' Cadd Operator Cadd Operator' Cadd OperaU~r Support Staff: Charlene Rose: Sharyn Tanner: Rosemary Gilson: Christine Ruppel: Heather Brown: Administration Accounting Word Processing Marketing Word Pr'ocessmg PERSONNEL AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 1.) YEARS IN BUSINESS: 2.) OFFICES: 3.) NAME OF FIRM: ADDRES S: TELEPHONE: FACSIMILE: EMAIL 4.) TYPE OF BUSINESS: 5.) RANGE OF SERVICES: 6.) OFFICERS: 34 years in business, established in 1964 Local only, but licensed in several states Purkiss Rose-RSI Landscape Architecture, Recreation & Park Planning 801 North Harbor Blvd. Fullerton, CA 92832 (714) 871-3638 (714) 871-1~88 rose~purkiss-rose-rsi.com ,A California Corporation iLandscape Architecture, Recreation and Park Planning, Comprehensive Park Master Planning, Urban Design, Streetscape, Public Works Projects, Public Workshops, Guidelines, ADA and CPSC Compliance, Construction Administration, Historical Preservation and Irrigation Design STEPHAN D~ ROSE, Landscape Architect, Executive Vice President, State License #1513, Contractual and Management Representative, Administration, Facilitator and member of the design team. JAMES R. PICKEL, Principal, Project Manager and member of the design team 7.) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATION: 8.) RESUMES (Attached): STEPHAND. ROSE, Executive Vice President, 801 N. Harbor Blvd, Fullerton, CA 92832 (714) 871-3638. STEPHAN D. ROSE, Landscape Architect JIM PICKEL? Project Manager (day to day City contact) Research Network, Ltd. and School Planning Services Research Network Ltd. Survey Research, Economics, Market Analysis Research Network Ltd. is a nationally-recognized independent marketing research firm specializing in the implementation of primary survey research as a foundation for market demand analyses. Founded in 1982, the firm's business i.s comprised of three primary client bases. The first two client bases are served by Research Network Ltd. while the third is served under a subsidiary organiza- tion, School Planning Services. Research Network Ltd. base of clients include those public and private interests with needs for real estate development market feasibility analyses as well as a second base of clients who represent diverse industries that rely upon Research Network Ltd. as a consumer research organization. School Planning Services, as a subsidiary of Research Network Ltd., exclusively serves the interests of California school districts with needs for enrollment forecasting, facility needs forecasts, long- range facility master plans, surplus site analyses, and developer fee implementation studies. As independent consulting firms, Research Network Ltd. and School Planning Services serve the interests of their clients solely through the recommendations provided which are based upon thoroughly compiled and presented primary and secondary research techniques. The professional background of our staff includes land development and community resource planning, consumer survey research, marketing, fiscal analysis, economics, and forecasting. Project teams are comprised of a principal of the firm who is responsible to the client for the services rendered. Clients receive the attention of the firm's management and experienced professionals to ensure that we provide you with accurate data upon which you can make your decisions. Research Network Ltd. is particularly well qualified to assist in preparing this parks and recreation attitudes survey. Our skills and abilities offer the following important characteristics: o Objectivity and Independence -- Our approach to projects is based on objectivity, rigor, discipline and accuracy -- factors which result in sound and credible analysis and actionable results. Demonstrated Experience -- Personnel assigned to this project are the principals of the firm; professionals with proven= expertise in designing, implementing, and analyzing consumer needs assessments as well as broader communi,ty resource planning. Locally Based Specialists -~ The individuals who will have day-to-day responsibility for the project are based in Southern California, available on short-term notice and familiar with the types of development and employment present locally, In addition, Research Network Ltd. has specific experience in: o Public Client Needs -- Working with elected and appointed officials, client staff, other governmental jurisdictions, community interest groups and others in the presentation, review and explanation of survey research design, implementation, and analysis. o Quality Survey Research -- Designing, impleme:nting, and analyzing consumer research to estimate recreation patterns, preferences, attitudes and needs. o Assessment of Need--. Determination of the prevalence or incidence of need among the population through a w~riety of information gathering strategies and/or devices. Identification and comparative analysis of available resources including an evaluation of the quality of the resources. Research Network Ltd. offers specialized experience in designing and implementing consumer surveys to yield actionable results aimed at land use pi.anning decisions. Pertinent comprehensive primary research experience includes: City of Brea Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Human Services Master Plan, Brea, California - City of Stockton Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Stockton, California City of San Clemente Parks and Recreation Attitude Survey, San Clemente, California City of Fremont Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Fremont, California City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Chula Vista, California San Diego County Bicycle Usage and Attitudes Survey, San Diego County, California City of Chino Hills Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Chino Hills, California City of Laguna Hills Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Laguna Hills, California - City of San Bernardino Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, San Bernardino, California City of Temecula Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Temecula, California City of Upland Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment, Upland, California Pamela Wooldridge will serve as the Managi,ng Principal and Project Manager. Pamela has more than twenty years experience in directing and preparing primary consumer research. Pamela has designed and implemented thousands of surveys among resident, employee and executive audiences. Mrs. Wooldridge was the Managing Principal and Project Manager for each of the above-referenced assignments. CI'FY ()l:' RANCHO CUCAMONG STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City' Manager CONSIDERATION OF LEASE AMENDMENT NO. 13 BETWEEN THE CITY AND INLAND VALLEY PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL ADJUSTING POLICE SECURITY COST iFOR THE 1999 BASEBALL SEASON AND TO MODIFY THE SECURITY PROVISION CONTAINED IN SECTION 25 OF THE LEASE liECOMMENDATION That the City Council approve Lease Amendment iNo. 13 adjusting the police security cost to $42,700 for the 1999 baseball season, and modifying the security provision contained in Section 25 of the lease. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the police security and security' cost at the Epicenter which is based on proposed attendance, and recommends a fixed amount ot' $42,.700 for the 1999 baseball season. The fixed cost does not include non-baseball events betbre or after the baseball games nor special games, non-scheduled games, or playoff games. These events will be assessed under separate invoice. Additionally, staff will continue to evaluate police security based on announced attendance. The Quakes must provide the City with monthly attendance report within ten days after the end of 'the each month. This report should include the season ticket holders that are included in the announced attendance. If this report or payments are not received in a timely basis, then the security cost will default back to the prior amounL If attendance at the Epicenter should increase to a point where additional police security is needed, the City reserves the right to increase security to reflect actual demand and assess the Quakes accordingly.. R,spegtfully sub¢itted, /Deputy City manager JiBF/dja AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO LEASE This Amendment No. 13 is. entered into as of April 7, 1999 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City" hereinafter) and 'Valley Baseball Club, Inc., a California corporation ("Tenant" hereinafter). A. Recitals. (i) City and Tenant entered into a Lease dated September 16, 1992 (the "Lease" hereinafter) regarding the ase of' the Stadium and ancillary facilities. (ii) The: Lease has been amended twelve times heretofore. (iii) The purpose of this Amendment No. 13 to the Lease is to modify the security provisions contained in Section 25 of the lease. B. Amendment No. 13. NOW, THEREFOPdi~, the lease hereby is amended as follows: 1. Section 25 of the Lease hereby is amended to read as follows: "25. City shall provide security for the Stadium beginning no later than January 1, 1995 during the following time periods. a. From the completion of any event conducted at the Stadium until dawn of the following day; and b. From dusk of a weekday upon which no event is conducted at the Stadium until dawn of the fi)llowing day; and c. For all 24 hours of each Saturday, Sunday and Holiday during which no event is conducted at the Stadium. "The parties understand that City may contract with an independent security service to discharge its. above-stated obligations. In addition, City shall provide a vehicle and radio transmission capacity on an as needed basis in providing for the above-described security. In aide of providing security for the Stadium, Tenant shall pay to the City the following total sums i:r~ five equal installments, payable on or before the first day of each successive montlh commencing in January in each of the following years: 1995 - $50,000 1996 ,- $52,500 1997 ,- $55,000 1998 - $57,,50(1t ] 999 - $60,t)00 2000 ~ $62,,500 2001 ~ $65,000 2002 - $67,500 "In addition, the Stadium Alterations shall include the installation at Tenant's expense of t¥om one to three additional security cameras in the Stadium's concourse area. Said additional cameras shall 'be compatible with the existing security systems servicing the Stadium and shall be connected to monitors in the Stadium's security office. The number of' additional security cameras in the concourse area shall be reasonably agreed tipon by Tenant and City's City Manager or his designee." "Tenant shall be: responsible t'br providing all necessary security for the Stadium and each and every Class A baseball game held at the Stadium. Tenant agrees to use such security officers in type and amount described in Exhibit "1" to Amendment No. 11 to the Lease. It is anticipated that: four (4} police officers shall be required for forty- seven (47) weekday games, five (1.5) police officers fbr twenty-three (23) weekend games and seven (7) police officers tbr the Jully 4, 199'9 game. Accordingly, Tenant's costs of providing such security for Class A regular season games shall be $42,627.20 during 1999, payable by Tenant in five, (1:5) equal install:ments at the same time as base rent shall be paid. Notwithstanding any other term or provision contained in this Section 25, security shall be provided in accordance with the above-referenced criteria, and should attendance compel the employment of officers in addition to those referred to above, Tenant shall reimburse City for the cost of providing such additional officers within thirty (1301) days of City providing to Tenant a statement reflecting such additional costs." 2. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease, as previously amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 12, and each and every term and provision contained therein, shall remain in full. tbrce and effect. WHEREFORE, City and Tenant have,' entered into this Amendment No. 13 as of the date set forth hereinabove. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. Henry. Stickney, President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT MAP 15766, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement and security extension and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BAC KG RO UN D/ANA LYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract Map 15766 were approved by the City Council on December 16, 1998, as follows: Faithful Performance Bond The developer, RC Apartments L.L.C., SI)0002 ~ 830 $851,809.00 is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. IEopies of the hnprovement Agreement and Securities Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LB:sd Attachment RESOt. UTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15766 WHEREAS, the City Council ot' the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 21, 1999, by RC Apartments, L.L.C.~ as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lane. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof; is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 15766; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said h'nprovement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the san~e are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said hnprovement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of' Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department TRACT 15766 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF VICTORIA iPARK LANE 1[766 NORTH CITY OF RANCItO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 19!.)9 TO: Mayor and Members of the City' Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Beck, Jr. Engineer ..:~ SUBJECT: APPROVAl.. OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT MAP 15926!. LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND PEPPERIDGE LANE, SUBMITTED BY MR. CECIL CARNEY lIECOMMENDATION: It is recornmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement and security extension and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. 11ACKGROUN D/ANALYSIS: hnprovement Agreement and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract Map 15926 were approved by the City Council on October 21, 1998, as tbllows: Faithful Perfbrmance Bond Cash deposit in the amount of $5,500.00 The developer, Mr. Cecil Carney, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the hnprovement Agreement and Securities Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls Attachment RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR. TRACT MAP 15926 WHEREAS, the City Council of the C:ity of Rancho Cucamonga, Calitbrnia, has tbr its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 21, 1998, by Mr. Cecil Carney, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pepperidge Lane. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract Map 15926; and WHEREAS, said lmprove. nient Agreement Extension is secured and accompmfied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, TflEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucmnonga, Calitbrnia hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement. Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor :is hereby auth. orized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucam. onga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department TRAC:T 1 926 LOCATED ON Tile SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND PEPPERIDGE LANE TRACT 15926 NORTH CI'FS' ()F RAXCHO C[iCAMONGA ST , iFF REPORT DATE; TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J.. O'Neil, City Engineer' Linda R. Beek, Jr. Enginee. r RELEASE THE MAINTENANCE BONDS FOR TRACT MAPS 13565-1 THROUGH -4, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Bond for Tract Maps 13565-1 through -,4 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from detects in materials and workmanship. Release: Developer: Maintenance Bond I 1 4142 1948 I 1 4142 1955 1 14142201I 1 I 41422037 I I 41422045 I I 4142 1971 I 1 4142 1963 1 1 4142 1997 I I 4142 1989 ! 1 41422029 I 1 41422003 Standard Pacific 1565; West MacArthur Boulevard Costa Mesa~ CA 92626 $302~000.00 $ i 48,000.00 $ i 03,000.00 $246,000.00 $160:,000.00 $'738,000.00 $2 ! 6,000.00 $806,000.00 $854~000.00 $253 ~000.00, $27 [ ,000.OC~, Respectfully submitted,- W illi a .~O'NeiI~~ WJO:LRB:dlw ~.,Attachment CI3'T O[v RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda Hackett, Project Manag Michael D. Long, Supervising Pub-'lfi~ks Inspector 1'~ ACCEPT THE 1997/98 RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 98-029, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $235,746.63 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the 1997/98 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 98-029, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion, and retain the Faithful Performance in the amount of $259,586.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $259,586.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $257,188~60. BACKG RO UN D/ANA LYS IS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $257,188.60, which includes no contract change orders. The original amount approved by Council was $285,545.59 Respectfully submitted, William J, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MDL:sd Attachments R}:iSOLLi'I'ION NO. ~q- O q~ A RESO:LU'TION OF TItE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1997/98 RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, CONTRACTNO. 98-029, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORiK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 1997/98 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 98-029, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completiion is required to be filed, certit~/ing the work is complete. NOW, TtlEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City E:ngineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CI]'Y OF RANCHO C',UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Williron J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda Hackett, Project M:mag'~"'/' ~ , Michael D. Long, Supervising Pu~w~'W~ks lnspector~'~ ACCEPT THE WIDENING OF THE CORNER OF FOURTH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-049, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND' APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $235,746.63 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the 'Widening of the Comer of Fourth Street ,'red Archibald Avenue Project as complete, Contract No. 98-049, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion," aa~d retain tim Faithful Performm~c:c in tile an~ount of $222,812.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond and aufl~orize file release of the Labor m'ld Matcri~s Bond in the anmunt of $222,812.00 six monfi~s after recordation of s,'fid notice if no chfims have been received. Also, authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $23,574.66, 35 days after file approval of the final contract mnot, nt of $235,746.63 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordm~.ce with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $235,746.63, which includes six contract change orders in the amount of $14,799.69, removal of additional trees, manhole reconstructions and temporary traffic controI. The original amount approved by Council was $245,093.20. Respectfully submitted, Williron J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MDL:sd Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WIDENING OF THE CORNER OF FOURTH STREEF AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-049, ANI) ALITHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Widening of the Corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue, Contract No~ 98-049, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted ~d the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 171 CITY O1:: RANClIO CUCAMONGA $T,,&FF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201-272-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Residential for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201- 272-17 and 18.. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-01 and Development District Amendment 99-01 by the adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At its March 10, 1999 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the approval of the subject General Plan and Development District Amendments. The background and staff analysis of the project are. contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report of March 10, 1999 FACTS FOR FINDING The Planning Commission findings are contained in the attached staff report of March 10, 1999. If the City Council concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission, it may adopt them for its actions on these applications, j CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 21, 1999 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Planning staff has been in contact with the property owner, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, whose representatives have stated that they do not have any concerns with the proposed land use changes. Resp bmitted,/',~' Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 10, 1999 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Min, utes dated March 10, 1999 Resolution of Approval for GPA 99-01 Ordinance for DDA 99-01 CI'I'Y OF' RANClIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 10, 1999 Chairman and Members of the PIanning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA- An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues -APN: 201-272-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA-An application to change the Development District zoning .designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Residential for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201-272-17 and 18. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Project Density: Proposed General Plan and Development District regulations will allow the development of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre of land. Presently 8 to14 dwelling units per acre are authorized. East West Surrounding Land Use and Zonin.q: North Vacant/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) South Highland Avenue, future freeway and single family residential/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) within the Victoria Planned Community Flood Control Channel and single family residential development/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) Single family residential development/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8..14 dwelling units/acre) North Low-Medium Residential (4-8 d'welling units/acre) South Future Freeway and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) East Open Space (Flood Control Channel) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) West Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) / 7-' /7'/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99o01 & DDA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 10, 1999 Page 2 Site Characteristics: The site abuts an improved flood control channel to the east, existing Low-Medium single family residential developments to the west and vacant Low -Medium land to the north. On the south, the site is next to the future Route 30 Freeway right-of-way and Low-Medium single family developments beyond. The site is presently vacant and near identified Riversidian Aluvial Fan Sage Shrub and Coastal Sage Shrub habitats that may extend into the site. There are no large trees on the site and most of the vegetation is of medium to large native shrubs. The site slopes t:o the south at 4.3 percent and is subdivided into two parcels of 9.61 and 8.24 acres, respectively. Both parcels are owned by the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The f'uture freeway is expected to be about 5 meters (16 feet) above the present grade at the ;present Lemon Avenue intersection. ANALYSIS: General: In 1998, a joint City Council/Planning Commission Task Force reviewed the land use relationship of many vacant multi-family zoned properties within the City. The Task Force made priority recommendations to the City Council regarding the scheduling of potential land use amendments for each location. At one location, at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues, the Task Force recommended that the City consider rezoning the properties when possible. Before 1988, the multiple family districts, Medium-High and Medium, on the south side of Lemon Avenue extended from the Lucky's shopping center on Haven east to the Deer Creek Channel. In 1988, a Land Use Amendment was approved changing a portion of the Medium District between Lemon and Highland Avenues to the west side of Lemon Avenue (as it turns south) to Low-Medium. This change allowed the development of a single family residential tract between the west side of Lemon Avenue and the existing apartments along the north side of the future Route 30 Freewall. As part of the processing of Tract 13890 in May 1988, the parcels along the east side of Lemon Avenue were included in a master plan concept with the tract map. This exhibit showed how the area to the east could also be developed with the same Low-Medium single family standards. The land use amendments did not, however, include the Medium Residential parcels along the Deer Creek Channel. If the area along the east side of Lemon Avenue were to develop as a multi-family project, as presently zoned, the single family tract (Tract 13890) would be "sandwiched" between two multi-family developments. With the changing of the two parcels, the Low-Medium, single family development will extend eventually, from properties along Banyan Avenue south to both sides of Lemon Avenue. Staff concurs w'i,th the Multi-Family task Force that this land use arrangement is preferable to the existing pattern. Presently, the site and all the surrounding land have a Master Plan Overlay District to coordinate development planning. Appropriateness of the Existing Medium Residential Designations: Residential is the predominate designation in the area generally north of Highland Avenue. With recent land use changes, only the existing multi,.family projects along the south side of Lemon Avenue are within the Medium-High Residential District in this neighborhood. Retention of the Medium Residential District would not provide a continuation of the multi-family character east along Lemon Avenue due to the existing single family development of Tract 13890. The site could remain, however, as a potential multi-family site with Lemon Avenue forming a buffer between the existing single family neighborhood and a future multi-family project. /7,5' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-01 & DDA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 10, 1999 Page 3 Appropriateness of the Proposed Low-Medium Residential Designation: With a few exceptions, the majority of the residential land north of Lemon Avenue is zoned single-family. Adoption of Low-Medium Residential for these applications would be appropriate with this trend and with recent land use changes in the immediate area. The two parcels, together, of this application are of sufficient size and configuration to design a high-quality project, as evidence by the Master Plan Site Plan illustrated for Tract 13890. D Housin.q: The only housing issue for these applications is the reduction in the number of potential residential units at build out and the affordability of the future units. The less intense land use density would result in a reduction of future units of between 71 and 107 units, This represents only .18 percent of the anticipated 58,974 total units estimated for the City's build out (Housing Element, Pa9e IIi-39). This loss, however and that of other General Plan Amendments, was more than made up for' by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 95- 03A (Griffin Industries), which added 339 single family units (Low-Medium Residential District) to the anticipated build out. Because of the higher' unit density., Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) neighborhoods are generally more affordable than o.ther lower-density, single-family districts. By dropping just one density designation, the resultant single family development should not be much less affordable than any other owner-occupied, multi-family units developed in the same area. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed. Staff has determined that no significant impacts would result from reducing the residential unit density on the subject properties. This amendment proposal simply reduces the potential residential unit development within similar residential land use categories. It is anticipated that most impacts generally expected from future residential development will be equal to or less than those expected under the existing category. The original environmental analysis for the existing land use category was included in the Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Environmental issues will need to be analyzed when formal development proposals are applied for in the future. When specific development projects are proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of the impacts. Any impacts noted will be mitigated through the City's development review process. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following facts for findings regarding these applications: The properties are suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use and development district designation in terms of access and size with similarly designated parcels; as evidenced by the applicant generated conceptual master plans for General Plan Amendment 88-02A, Development District Amendment 88-01, and Tract 13890. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Environmental Study that indicate that no significant impacts would be expected because of this land use change. / PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT (SPA 99-01 & DDA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(SA March 10, 1999 Page 4 The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and the Development Code because of the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for single-family residential developmenL CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendment 99~01 and Development District Amendment 99-01 with Master Plan Overlay requirement by the adoption of the Resolutions of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - (seneral Plan Maps Exhibit "B" - Development District Maps Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Master Plan, 'Tract 13890 ((SPA 88-02A; DDA 88-01) Exhibit "D" - Environmental Initial Study, Part II Resolution - Recommendation of Approval for (SPA 99-01 Resolution - Recommendation of Approval for DDA 99-01 /77 .:..~ VERY LOW <:2 DU's/AC COMMERCIAL '.:.'.~ LOW 2-4 DU's/AC ~-'~ COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ~ LOW-MEDIUM 4-8DU's/AC NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. · .........~ MEDIUM 8-~4 DU's/AC REGIONAL COMMERCIAL · .~.:..:.=.~ MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24DU's/AC ~",i.:.~ OFFICE ~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC ® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED ~_-,-- ~"~'~ ,-.~' ;-_ ."~.'t MONGA CITY OF RA, N~FiO.,CUCA Project: c_~.e:~ ~-. Title: ~ Exhibit L MH M ~ LM LM~ ~ LM L [3 O LM ~ [3' E] JLJUt. J[J~'u Ju[ LM .~ LM LM LM~ ~] V.P.C. I aaooc~ooao~'"'~'"'"c~-"-: T.V.P.C. BASELINE ROAD. CITY OF R~~,CAMONGA P LA N~I I [4~-C~D~[~I S10 N /?¢ o CITY OF R ,ANC~HL.(3:,G.U,CAMONGA PLANNIN_~?~!.~I~ION Project: "Title::: c°~--e~u~t L' Exhibit: City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: General Plan Amendment 99-01' Development District Amendment 99-01 o Related Files: General Plan Amendment 88-02A; Development District Amendment 88-01 Description of Project: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201-272-17 and 18. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Residential for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201-272-17 and 18. Project Sponsor's Name and Address::: City of Rancho Cucamonga t0500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 General Plan Designations: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Zoning: Medium Residential (8o14 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site consists of two contiguous vacant lots on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Lemon Avenue, and west of the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. On the west side there is a single family development, on the north side the land is vacant, the east side is bordered by the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel, and on the south is Highland Avenue with single family residences beyond. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Alan Warren, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant: Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Geological Problems ( ) Water ( ) Air Quality (x) Transp,odation/Circulation (x) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards (x) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance (x) Public Services (x) Utilities and Service Systems ( ) Aesthetics (x) Cultural Resources (x) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requi;red. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: Alan ~V~arren ~ Associate Planner February 1, 1999 Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. If41u~! an~J Supperbrig Informabort $~gn~f~c~nt Impacl In~t~ret~ Impa~ Impact d) LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would l'he proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Be incompatible with existing I!and use in the vicinity? () () ( ) (x) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) The project does not propose any development improvement. The request is to change the General and Development District land use designations from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and community facility to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The General Plan and Development District Amendments are the appropriate applications to change the land use designations. The approval process, if granted, will not cause conflict with the General Plan and zoning. b) The site is near sensitive Riversidian Aluvial Fan Sage Shrub and Coastal Sage Shrub habitats. The land use designation changes will not impact the natural environment, as no development is being proposed. The General Plan and Development Code currently designate the site for residential uses and the proposal will continue the residential zoning but at a reduced unit density. c) Much of the land surrounding the subject properties is already designated for Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) uses. Changing the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential would be consistent with the surrounding area. Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 end Su!Dpo~ling InformaI~on So~rcea POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.' a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extensio, n of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? Potenl~ally Impact Unless Than M,bgahon Incoq3orated Impact No Impacl ( ) ( ) () (x) () ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) end Suppo~l~ng Info~'mat~:h"3 GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Fault rupture? Seismic ground shaking? Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? Seiche hazards? Landslides or mudflows? Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation,. grading, or fill? Subsidence of the land? Expansive .,;oils? Unique geologic or physical features? S~gn~'can~ $,gnd~can~ Impact L®iI Unless Then Md~gM~on S ~ln~fc, an¢ Incx3~pOCaledImpact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () () (x) () ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () ( ) (x) () () () () () () () () () () () () (x) (x) (x) (x) WATER. a) b) Will the proposal result in.' Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? () () $igrtr~ln! Impale1 Unlalt () () Than S,gndicanl Impa~ () () No (x) (x) Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 issues and Supporting fnformalron Sources c) d) e) 0 g) h) i) Pol®ntlally Impacl Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (eg., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity).? ( ) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations,. or through substantial loss of groundwater' recharge capability? ( ) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) Impacts to !groundwater quality? ( ) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) Unless Than NO Impact ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) () ( ) (x) ( ) (x) () ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () () (x) Comments: a) The land use change is being requested without an accompanying development project. The land use change will not in itself cause any impacts to the water supplies. The future development of the site will increase runoff because the site is currently vacant and any' development will add impervious surfaces such as street improvements, driveways, and rooftops. Tentative Tract Maps usually include conditions of approval requiring certain storm drain system and ground surface conveyance improvements thai: will handle the increased flows. The impact is not considered significant.. b) The site is owned by' the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and is adjacent to an existing flood control channel. The flood control facility is fully improved with a concrete lined channel. The General Plan indicates that the Flood Control land use designation is within the confines of the channel and therefore no flood hazard is expected to affect adjacent properties. f&g) Because of potential improvements anticipated after the land use change listed above, it is expected that some reduction in rainwater percolation to the ground water may result. The future residential development of the site would be in conformance with similarly developed residential land in the City and therefore the impact is not considered significant. Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98~03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 I$sue~l and Suppoding Infol'mabon Sources S~gmf~..Jnl ............. Impact AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.' a) b) c) d) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) Create objectionable odors? ( ) $~gnrficJnt Impact La,,I! UnJe~l~l Than M~t,ge(~on S~gndica, nl ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) () () (x) () () (~) Comments: a) The land use change is being requested without an accompanying development project. The land use change will not cause any impacts to the air quality. The future development of any vacant land in the city will add to the vehicle trips and, as a result, add to potential air quality degradation whatever the land use designation. The subject property is currently zoned Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units/acre) which could result in 142 to 250 units. The revised designation, Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), could result in development of between 71 and 142 units.. It is anticipated that any development under the Low- Medium Residential designation would experience fewer traffic impacts; therefore, air quality impacts would be less than if developed under the current designation. Furthermore, the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Air Quality Management Plan accounts for the existing land use designations in its programs. The proposed land use change retains the residential potential, but at a less intensive level. No increase in air quality impacts would be expected from the existing development potential. I~lues and SuppOrt,ng Info~'mahon Sources TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Insufficient parking capacity one. site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 I$$ue~ and Supix~hng Informal~on Sources e) Potenhally Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) g) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g.., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Rail or air traffic impacts? Im p,e~ Les~ Unle$:l, Then No () () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () ( ) (x) Comments: a) The development of any vacant land in the city will add to the vehicle trips and add to potential traffic congestion whatever the land use designation. The subject property is currently zoned Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units/acre) which could result in 142 to 250 units. The revised designation, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) could result in development of between 71 and 142 units. It is anticipated that any development under the Low-Medium Residential designation would exhibit traffic impacts less than if developed under the current designation. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. in impacts to: a) b) c) d) e) Would the proposal result Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but riot limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Locally designated natural comrnunities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, alparian, and vernal pool'.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a&c) The site is near sensitive Riversidian Aluvial Fan Sage Shrub and Coastal Sage Shrub habitats. The land use designation changes will not impact the natural environment as no development is being proposed. The General Plan and Development Code currently designates the site for residential uses and the proposal will continue the residential zoning but at a reduced unit density. Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Future development proposals in the area should evaluate their impacts on the habitat. Mitigation measures may be required if the impacts to the habitat are considered significant. It is recommended that a habitat study be included as a part of an environmental assessment before any authorization for development. P'otenhally Impact Less Polentlelfy Unless Than Impa~ In,or. sled Impsol Impa~ ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? () ( ) () (x) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future, value to the region and the residents of' the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve..' a) A risk of accidental explosion or" release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards"? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees'.;' S ~ln d*lC.~nl ~m p4uct Leila Pc4enl~ellyUn~ilil. J, Than ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () () () (x) Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 10. Issues and $upport~r~l Irr~ormahon Sources NOISE. a) b) Will the proposal result in,' Increases in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Potentially Impac~ Than S*gmf~llnl No Impact ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) The project will add new sources of noise such as automobiles because it entails adding' new homes to vacant land when developed. The increase in noise levels however is not excessive and not expected to exceed City adopted noise level limits. The impact: is not considered significant. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' a) b) c) d) e) Fire protection? () Police protection? ( ) Schools? ( ) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) Other governmental services? ( ) () (x) () () ( ) (x) () (x) () ( ) () (x) () ( ) (x) Comments: a&c) The eventual development of the site will increase the demand on public services since it will entail adding new homes on vacant land. Tract Map conditions of approval usually require the developer to participate in the funding of special districts for the necessary construction and maintenance of fire protection and pay appropriate school fees. Therefore, the impact is not considered significant. Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or suppries or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) b) c) d) e) 0 g) Power or natural gas? Communication systems? Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water supplies? S~lnr~nt rmp~lct () ( ) (x) () ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) No Impeel ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a,b,& d) A housing project at the :site will ,produce a need for water supplies, waste disposal, gas and electric service since new homes will be built. Typical Tentative Tract Map conditions of approval require the developer to provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewer system, water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV. The cost of these improvements are borne by the developer. The impact is not considered significant. The unit density reduction should result in service need reductions below what would be expected under the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) designation. e) A housing project will increase runoff because the site is currently vacant and any improvement project will add impervious surfaces such as street improvements, driveways, and rooftops. Tentative Tract Map conditions of approval usually require certain storm drain system and ground surface conveyance improvements that will handle the increased flows. The cost of these improvements are borne by the developer. The impact is not considered significant. 13. AESTHETICS. Woul'd the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Have a demonstrable negalive, aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) b) c) d) e) ~mpect Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) Affect historical or cultur'al resources? ( ) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) leper! Less Mlhget~on No () ( ) (x) () ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) () () () () (x) (x) 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for" neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? $~gn~lcant Impact () () () () Then $~n~fmcent Irapod (x) () Irapeet () (x) Comments: a) Any housing project will increase the demand on parks in the area because it involves adding new hornes. Developers will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of building permit issuance to offset any impact on parks. The impact is not considered significant. II~lues al~:~ $uplPO~lng Inforrnel,~on Sources 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number' or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or preh:istory? () ( ) ( ) (x) /W Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Impact Md~gehon issues a~d Suppotl~ng Info~'rnet~on Source~: Potenhalfy Th~ ,. Impe~ Impa~ Impect b) Sho~ term: Does the project have the potential to achieve sho~-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A sho~-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure weft into the future.) () () () (x) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively' considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed i'n connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which w~fi cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in compfeting this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan Environmental Impact Report (Certified April 6, 1981) (x) Master Environmental Assess~ment fo,' the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Environmental Assessment Part II Initial Study for General Plan Amendment 99-01 and Development District Amendment 99-01 (February 1, 1999) Initial Study for GPA 98-04; VCPA 98-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: Print Name and Title: Alan Warren., Assocfate ~'lanner Date: I:\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\ENVDOC\GPA99-01 ,wp,d ~L Project: ~ P'A ':t~-o( ~ Title' /.-~-~-r'lok.) /HA.,'° Exhibit: Date: RESOLUTION NO. 99- 16 A RESOLUTIC)N OF THE PLANNfNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR 17,85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201-272-17 and 18. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has aulhorized the filing of an application for General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 as described in the litre of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, lhe subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headrig on/he application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to Ihe adoplion of this Resolulion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by Ihe Planning Commission of Ihe City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facls set forth in the Recilals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 10, 1999, including written and oral staff reporls, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies Io two parcels of land totaling approximately 17.85 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration,. located near the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues and is presently vacant.. Said properties are currently alesignaled as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and b. The properties Io the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant with a concrete flood control charmer. The property 1o the south, on the south side of Highland Avenue, is designated as Low-Medium Residential 8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district m a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development: and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. March 10, 1999 Page 2 99 - 16 and This amendment promotes Ihe goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would nol be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the subslantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and uipon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as folrows: a. That the subject property is suiIable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area as evidenced by the Conceptual Master Plan for a single family residential development exhibited in the previous Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 applicalion; and b. That the proposed amendment wo~JId not have significant impacts on the environment nor [he surrounding properties; ;i.~nd c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by/he adoption of this land use amendment application. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negalive Declaration, together wilh all writlen and oral reports included for the environmenial assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds Ihat Ihere is no substantial evidence lhat the project will have a signific:anl: effect upon Ihe environment and adopts a Negalive Declaralion based upon Ihe findings as follows: a. That the Negative Oec:lar'ati,or~ has been prepared in compliance wilh Ihe California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Ihe State CEQA guidelines promurgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaralion and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negalive Declaration wilh regard Io the application. b. That. based upon the changes and atler'ations which have been incorporaled into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provision:s of Secdon 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaralion for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adver,se impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based u'pon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, Ihe staff reports and exhibits,, and the inl'ormation provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set fodh in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Map ~or the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." /9/-,' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C, March 10, 1999 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission o1" the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cerlify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of tt'~e C:ily of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on Ihe 10th day o1' March 1999, by the following vote-lo-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:' t.I~ACIAS, MA.qNERIN0, HCNEIL, STE~/ART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: rl0tlE: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I't'0N E /~? r Chaffey College I ,'I-' :, v.'.v.v.V.'v~; ,,,%k.. ,~:.v.'.'~. ~ ..... ~.-.'.'.'.'.:~ , '.' ............... ilffil~JllJIIl" ~ ~ t ! i'l'l'i'l'l't'ii I ;~,iiii :.:::.:."" ! iiii::::ii:: ...... i!i!F...} , ......:,, i ,,,,,,, ~" :::~; RESIDENTIAL ~ VERY LOW <2 ~u's/AC · :.,.=:~ LOW 2-4DU's/AC F----1 LOW-MEDIUM 4-SDU's/AC .... ...:..:'.~ MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC -~,.'.'~ MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC ~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC ® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED I i COMMERCIAL COMMLJN!TY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE CITY OF RANCHO.CUCAMONGA P LAN~IIN~.~;D|¢IS'ION RI~i'~SOLLYTION NO. 99- I7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY, FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201-272-17 and 18. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing of an application for Development Distdct Amendment No. 99-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, lhe subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2, On March 10, 1999, the Plan, ning Commission or' the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8.14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4.8 dwelling unifs per acre) For the properties at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. 3. On March 10, 1999, the Planning Commission o1' the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducled a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found. determined, and resolved by Ihe Planning Commission of the City ot' Rancho Cucamonga as t'otlows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically Finds lhat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 1999, including written and orar staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically I"inds as follows: a, The applicali'on applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 17.85 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration, located near the northeast corner el' Highland and Lemon Avenues and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently within the Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per) District with a Master Plan OverDay designation; and b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and a~o vacanl. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling u, nits per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant with a concrete I'1ood conItel channel. The property to the south, on the south side of Highland Avenue, is designated as Low-Medium Residential (4.8 dwelling unitsper acre) within the Victoria Planned Community' and is developed wi~h a single family residential project: and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-01 - CIT'Y OF R.C. March 10, 1999 Page 2 99-17 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with relaled development upon the enaclment of General Plan Amendment 99-01; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significanl impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject properly [s suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area as evidenced by the Conceptual Master plan for a singre family residential development exhibited in the previous Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 application; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on Ihe environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendmenl is in conformance wilh the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99..01; and 4. Based upon the facts and informalion contained in Ihe proposed Negative Declaration, togelher with all written and oral reports included lfor lhe environmental assessment for the applicalion, the Planning Commission fh'~ds Ihat there is no substantial evidence that Ihe project will have a significant effect upon the env'ironmen! and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon lhe findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declarali'on has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, Ibis Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to Ihe provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the proiecl, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 o¢ the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU'TION NO. DDA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. March 10, 1999 Page 3 99-17 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment 99-01 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) with a Master Plan Oreday as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." The Secretary to this Commissio. n shall certify to the adoption of this Resorution~ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1999. PLANNING C/~MMISSION OF THF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Bullet, Secrelary of Ihe Planning Commission of Ihe C,ty ot' Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby certify that lhe ~'oregoing Resolution was duly and regularly inlroduced, passed, and adopied by the Planning Commission o:1' the City of Rancho Cucamonga, al a regular roecling of the Planning Commission held on Ihe 10th d~.~y of March 1999, by the following vole-lo-wit: AYES: COMMISSIC)NERS: ~qAC[~l'.!;, ~t~r~E:R{t~0, t'lCt;EIL, STERART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RA, NC~FI~-.C_U,CAMONGA PLANNING;DI~ilSION Project: Title: ~'r- ExhibiI: A Date: PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17.85 acres Iocated at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201.-272-17 and 18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-!4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues - APN: 201-272-t7 and 18. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. There was no testimony and he closed the hearing. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Tolstoy, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and to adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 99-01 and Development District Amendment 99-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL,. :STEWART, TOLSTOY NONE NONE - carried OLD BUSINESS C. DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW 98-23 TRACT 15727- PHASES 3,4,5,6,; 8 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES, INC. - A design review application to amend standards for Phases 4, 5, 7, and 8 of previously approved Amended Ter Tract 15727 consisting of 339 (formerly 342) single family lots in the Low-Medium District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and authorize the use of the Develo de optional standards, on 82 acres located between Fourth and Sixth Streets, adja¢ the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel - APN: 210-.062-02, 11, t3, 17, 18 26, 32, and 33. Related files: Lot Line Adjustment No. 404 and Development/Desi 98-21, and 98-16. NEW BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 15727-PHASES 4,5,7 AND 8 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A review of' precise site plan and building elevations for 154 single family units in phases 4, 5, 7 of amended Tentative Tract 15727, consisting of 339 (formerly 342) single family the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on 82 acres of I; located between Fourth and Sixth Streets, adjacent to the Cucamonga Creek F Control Channel. APN: 210-02-02, 11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 32, and 33. related Files: ustment No. 404 and Development/Design Review 98-23, 97-12, and 98-16. Planning Commission Minutes March 10, 1999 so:u r,o 9f 9.F A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE. TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-272-17 AND 18. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing of an application for General Plan Amendment NQ 99-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval to the City Council. 3. On April 21, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 21 1999,, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 17.85 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration, located near the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant with a concrete flood control channel. The property to the south, on the south side of Highland Avenue, is designated as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project; and c. This amendment does not: conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-01 o CITY OF R.C. April 21 1999 Page 2 This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. referenced above, this Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area as evidenced by the Conceptual Master Plan for a single family residential development exhibited in the previous Vesting Tentative Tract 13890 application; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of this land use amendment application. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City' Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project:, there is no .evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence. contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of advers~ effect as set forth in Secti:on 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendrnent No. 99-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the ad~option of this Resolution. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY, FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201- 272-17 AND 18 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the filing of an application for Development District Amendment No. 99-01 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated Generat Plan Amendment No. 99-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. 3. On March 10, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of Development District Amendment No. 99-01 to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. 4. On April 21, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. 5. On April 21, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applicatiom 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on April 21, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 17.85 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration, located near the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently within the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per) District with a Master Plan Overlay designation; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 21, 1999 Page 2 b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant with a concrete, flood control channel. The property to the south, on the south side of Highland Avenue, within the Victoria Planned Community, is designated as Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the enactment of General Plan Amendment 99-01; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area as evidenced by the Conceptual Master plan for a single family residential development exhibited in the previous Vesting Tentative Tract 13.890 application; and b. That the proposed amendrnent would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is ir~ conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-01. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. April 21, 1999 Page 3 potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-01 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) with a Master Plan Overlay as shown on the attached Exhibit: "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 21, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 - A review of the Federally required Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 1999- 2000, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant Annual Application, based on a new grant allocation of $959,000 and approximately $125,856 in reprogrammed funds. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council conduct a second public hearing and take public testimony regarding the application for funding and adopt the Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan, thereby authorizing the Mayor to submit the plan to the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for their consideration. BACKGROUND Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided by HUD to cities and counties based on a formula which considers the community's population, extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. To be eligible for funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG program: · The development of viable, urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living ) environment. · The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. CDBG regulations require that at least 70 percent of all funds be directed to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 1999-2000 fiscal year, 90 percent will benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. This year's grant allocation of $959,000 represents a $7,000 increase from last year. The year before, the grant was reduced by $32,000, or 3..25 percent, from the previous year. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATION April 21, 1999 Page 2 On March 17, 1999, the City Council conducted a public hearing to take testimony concerning the City's housing and community development needs. At that meeting, the Council recommended approval of the draft Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan with a modification to add one additional public service provider, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library's Back-to-Basics program, granting them $10,000. This change was made possible by refining the funding of certain staff positions and transferring $8,110 from the multi-year, Senior Center expansion project. The transfer will not have any effect on the timing of the Senior Center expansion. CORRESPONDENCE Notices for availability of the final Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan and for the public hearing were published on March 22, 1999, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin as an eighth-page display ad. Copies of the public hearing notice were posted at City Hall, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. Copies of the draft Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan Executive Summary were mailed to local City and County government agencies and the San Bernardino County Housing Authority. Re ctfu subrni~e~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG/jfs Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Funding Recommendations Exhibit "B" - Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan FY 1999-2000 -CDBG PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Administration Capital Improvement Program Rancheria P~ ~or Year Reprogram FY 99=00 FY 99-00 Recommendation - FLnidiii~ Funds o.oo1$ o.oo1, t40,000.00 I $ 140,000.00 YES R. uir. EIe.n, (Construction) -- S 239 300.0C S O.00 S RCSC Landscaping (Design/Construction) RCSC Expansion Renovation (Design) $ ~ RCgE: ........ o .......... (Construction) .............. :::-~-~,~- $ 467,500.00 $ 52.350.00 $ 19,44650 - ~" ': """: ':" ' $ 49,000.00 ..,~: - ...;. · .. . .-: · ...:!-~:~...... s 30,375.00 · :,~,:'"-'"-~"'~:~':~ ~"~-~-~~00.~. $ 34,135.00 00C S 239,~,0.~,u $ 239,300.00 0.00 $ 21,621.16 $ 27,500,00 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0.uu > 0 O0 $ 0.00 $ 4,290.00 $ 0.00 $ 4.290.00 0.00 $ 10,000.00 $ !5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 0.00 $ t6.804.38 $ 4.485.62 $ 2~ .290.00 YES - Design Funded FY 96-97 Fund Project Construction YES - Complete Design NO - Funding Unavailable 0.00 $ 0,00 NO - Funding Unavafiab~e 0:00 $ 30,000 00 YES- Fund Oesigp r~ ~t~ YES Fund E,es~gn 0.00 $ 71.796.50 ~ YES- Bank Availabie Funds YES - Fund Project Design YES - Continue Eligibie Program YES - Continue Eligible Program $100,000.00 S :56.000.00 S '00.000.00 S 9.00 S 100000.00 S 200.900.00 o.oo $ o.oo $ o.oo I $ 0.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 325,000.00 51.45$ 9,948.55$ 10,000.00 51.4515 334,948.55I$ 335,0"00.00 Metrolink S,tation Mechanical Lift for Disabled Sidewalk Qrindin~j Wi~eetchair Ramps ISle House - Etiwanda Histonca; SOG,eI,.~ Subtotal - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Home Improvement Program Home Improvement Program Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance Subtotal - HOME IMPROVEMENT Public Services Programs Graffiti Removal IFHMB - Fair Housing o.oo $ o.oo $ 0.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 1,739.56 $ I0,260.44 $ 12,000.00 YES - Continue Historic Preservation YES - Continue Eligible Program YES - Continue Eligible Program YES - Continue Eligible Program YES - Continue Required Program Exhibit "A" - Page 1 of 2 IFHMB - Landlord/Tenant "qo.rTle!Os$ OtJtrOaCh. r~ 0, a . "o..,r,: q,$. and Educat!on cootbig Fam.ly S.~e!ter Water of Ufe Community Church "- ...... i L~teracy League i ~o::,~ fO B3S cs .; Subtot~ - PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS TOTAL FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 Prior Year Reprogram App, oved Approved Requested Funding FLmd$ AIIocatIoc~ Allocation Allocation ' ':~,: ~:h',."-.:..?.~'I,..:-: ..~.-~- $ fO,0~2,00'.!:" $ ';~'~,~:40,00':. S 12.654 00 S 0.00 S 1,964.90 $ 6;;fg7.00' '$ O~{~O.00 S 12 000 O0 $ 0 O0 $ 0.00 $ 3,01;)0.00..'.$ 2,~.'10.00 S 3.000.00 $ P,.00 S O.00 $ ?,600.007'$ 7;::~.00 S 20.399.00 S 0.00 $ C.00 $ 7,000,00$ 6,780.00$ 8.000.00$ 0.00SO.OO $ 7. :00 ..$ ,74o:0o s 5oo.oo s o.oo s m $ 6;810.00 3,000,00 $ 2,910.00 $ 8.000.00 ..:;'..,=..,: . v..,.'"~.....-. - r. 5.9".)3 0C S 3 0C t S S 6.030.¢C S ..... I S 2 .........uu S ,9 C0 I S ................ 4- i~ c 23 :;-'-)0 03 S :: ~)3 I $ ................. ." ... '; ';.:.i;O0.0C ' S (,.Cd ' S .... "nf, $ I¢' f'-:00 OR 4. . . . 3.0O S FY 99~)0 Proposed Allocat{o~ 8,035.10 5.zC0 30 3.000.00 7.600.00 7.000 00 7.OO0.OO 6.000.00 5 000 0C '::.c.37 { S ::R4?.} c oo is ~.5o.'a.o0 J.5';b.3~ [ S S!25.856.35 S u~.0,,O .... FY 99-00 Recommendation Total Reason Available 10,000.00 YEs- Gc,':,,'uu ,,.).,.+~.~ v,..,: ~'."'',.:'~.' :.;2u .":,=.; ,- 3.000.00 'rF5 - u:;"t '-..,: E ~ :; ~ ;'.'o0'¢'" 7.600 00 Y=:s :. ~..{ .,.., i: :3 :: e ~':);-~... 7.00000 '"'.- 9 - (:,:"' '-. ~ L".~: = ,. P' ::;.n -- 7.000.00 vFS- <:::": '..e r..~.p.¢. P'~s..'~,~"' 6.000.00 ~ ['~'~ ' C;.":.r'..¢. i -j,:~ e l:'c?.;'-' 5 000.00 -. 5-:.' ......:. ! ; .~ ,.. r-.,;,;..,.-- .?.O'~(J C'~I :..g . · ....... . --;-- 8.500.3,0 -L:~ ::,-'" .,.~-::,..:~.-:: .::. :.. ;:3C { '-- - ', .'- : '- 0.00 ',,.; ' ' , '.',', .-'". .......:- ~- ' :53.544.d7 $ $i .2,, ,o0o.5u . .,. e, ..e :e:w¢¢r ,eq,,*!5.ec a av..n a* e: $1,275.578.50 FY 99/00 Entitlement Grant $959,000 Public Service Cap = 15% $103,644.67 / 959,000 = 10.81% ($143,850 Maximum) Administration Cap = 20% $140,000 / 959,000 = 14.59% ($191,800 Maximum) Funds available for reprogramming include the following: FY 95/96, Acct. 9316 (9t" Street) $28,437.27, FY 97/98 Acct. 9500 (Tapia Via Drive) $2,884.97, Acct. 9713 (RCSC Parking Des/Const.) $7,387.7!, Acct. 8189 (Oldtimers Home Maintenance) $51.45, Acct. 8187 (Fair Housing) $I ,739.56, Acct. 9i 14 (Landlord/Tenant) $1,964.90, Acct. 9619 (Senior Citizen Services) $150.87, and Acct. 9716 (RSET) $153.20, FY 98-99 Acct. 9833 (Tapia Via - Sidewalks) $88,119.31. These total $130,889.24, subtracting out the balance discrepancy of $5,032.89 results in a balance of $125,856.35. · Multi year project funding for ADA Improvements has occurred through the Lion's East, Lion's West, RCSC Interior, Sidewalk Grinding, and Wheelchair Ramp programs. Exhibit "A" - Page 2 of 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 April 21, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (FORM SF424) .......................... Page 1 iNTRODUCTION ......................................................... Page 2 RESOURCES AVAILABLE .................................................. · Federal Resources .............................................. · Other Resources .............................................. · Leveraging and Matching Funds .................................. Page 2 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 ACTIVITIESTO BE UNDERTAKEN ............................................... Page 4 Affordable Housing ..............................................Page 4 Homeless .....................................................Page 10 Homeless Annual Plan ............................................ Page 11 Special Needs ................................................. Page 12 Special Needs Annual Plan ....................................... Page 13 Non-Housing Community Development Needs ....................... Page 13 OTHER ACTIONS ...................................................... Page 22 Economic Development ............................................ Page 22 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing .............................. Page 22 Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs .......................... Page 24 Actions to Foster and Maintain Affordable Housing ................... Page 25 Actions to Remove Barriers to Affordable Housing ................... Page 25 Actions to Evaluate and Reduce Lead-Based Paint Hazards ............ Page 25 Actions to Reduce the Number of Poverty Level Families .............. Page 25 Actions to Develop Institutional Structure and Enhance Coordination ... Page 26 Public Housing Improvements ..................................... Page 26 Monitoring ....................................................... Page 26 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ................................................... Page 27 APPENDIX"A"-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................. Appendix"A"- Page A1 FY 1999-2000 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN APPENDIX"B"-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................ Appendix"B"- Page B1 ANALYSIS OFIMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING APPENDIX "C" - ATTACHMENTS ................................ Appendix "C" - Page C1 SUPPORTING MAPS: AREA, PROPOSED PROJECTS, CENSUS BOUNDARIES, Low-MOD INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT' SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS CERTIFICATIONS Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Application for Federal Assistance -1. Type of Submission~ Application: Non - Construction Pre~_pp!!¢atior~: Non - Construction 5. Applicant Information Legal Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Address P.O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 San Bernardino 6. Employer Identification Number (E~N): ~E~32130O2 8. Type of Application: Type: Continuation 3. Date Rsceive~ by Stale Date Received by Federal Agency Apl~icant Identifier State Application Identifier Federal [dentJ~er Organizat~nal Unit Planning Division Larry J. Henderson, Principal Planner (~09) 477-2750 7. Type of Applicant: Municipal 10. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: Catalog Number: 14218 Assistance Title: Community Development Block Grant 12. Areas Affected by Project: Community Wide g. Name of Federal Agency- U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development 11. Descriptive Tifie of Applicant's Project: Housing Rehab; Handicap, Street, and Public Facility Improvernents; Historic Preservation; and Public Services (Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant, Graffiti Removat, Homelessness, Food A_~_~_i_~tance, Domestic Violence, Senior, Youth, and Literacy). 13. Proposed Project: Start Date 07/01/99 15. Estimated Funding: a. Federal 14. Congressional Districts of: I 16. Is Application Subject to Review by State Executive Order 12372 Process? $959,(:X:]O F~eview Status: Program not covered b. Applicant c. State Local Other $125,856 17 Is the Applicam Delinquent on Any Federal Debt?. f. Program Income 18. To the best of my knowledge and belief. all data in this application~lprespptication are true and correct, the document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant wfil comply ~ the attached assu~,ances if the assistance is av~rded a Typed Name of Authorized Representative I b. Title c. Telephone Number William J. Alexander Mayor (~:]9) 477-2700 d Signature of Authorized Representative e. Date Signed Page 2 INTRODUCTION The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to be undertaken during the 1999-2000 program year. The report identifies local objectives and priority needs identified by the City to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. RESOURCES AVAILABLE Federal Resources Community Development' Block Grant CDBG funds are the primary Federal funds available to the City during the program year. The City's grant allocation available for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is expected to be $959,000, which is $7,000 more than Fiscal Year 1998-99. CDBG funds reprogrammed from previous years total $125,856.35, providing $1,084,856.35 available for funding program activities. The sum of all CDBG funds available totals $1,277,506.50, which includes $192,650.15 in prior year program funds. The City does not expect to receive any pro,gram income during the 1999-2000 program year. San Bernardino County Housing Authority The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the region. The Agency currently operates 6,257 Section 8 housing units of which 185 and 16 public housing units are located within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority are primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing programst County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development The County receives Federal funds to implement the HOME Consortium, which the City joined in July 1995. The County operates four programs through the HOME Consortium which include the HOME Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP), HOME Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) Program, HOME Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, and the HOME Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) Program. The County allocation for these programs total $4,035,000, and includes funds for program administration.. These programs are all available to City residents on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium The Homeownership Assistance, Tenant Based Assistance, and Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation programs are discussed under specific activities in the Consolidated Plan, however, the CHDO Set-Aside program is not: identified and therefore warrants further discussion. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside from the County HOME Consortium and provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored or owned by non-profits which have been certified as a community housing development organization. The CHDO program functions as a source of funding for a variety of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential structures. Funds are not targeted to a specific area or type of project within the County, however, recipient income cannot exceed 80 percent of the County medium family income. HOME furlds are available to. eligible residents citywide on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,031,5(:)0 allocated to this program. · Other Resources City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency State law requires Redevelopment Agencies to set aside at least 20 percent of tax increment revenue for increasing and improving the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing. Between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 2000, approximately $23 million will be generated by tax increment for affordable housing. The tax increment allocation to the 20 Percent Set-Aside during the reporting period is projected to be $5,631,782. However, it should be noted, that the Agency's tax increment has already :been pledged against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is actually very little un-obligated funding available. In July 1996, the Agency approved in concept, the sale of tax allocation bonds to provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC) and Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC), located within the City for affordable housing: purposes. On September 1, 1996, Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $37.66 million were sold. Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner: ,¸ A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with SCHDC in which $3.9 million will be provided annually for deibt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $790,000 of the annual pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the funds will be available for any Agency housing program. The Agency negotiated a pledge agreement through the year 2025 with NHDC in which $1.5 million was paid to NHDC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. An additional $5 million in net bond proceeds were also paid to the NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood which includes continuing the development of infill housing on vacant lots, acquisition and rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge amount will be $1.4 million through the year 2025. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 · Leveraging and Matching Funds The primary source of fund leveraging will occur in conjunction with activities carried out through the Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds. This is accomplished through public/private partnerships with non-profit housing devetopm,ent corporations such as the NHDC and the SCHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME Funds and Low Income Housing Tax Credits. ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN · Affordable Housing OBJECTIVE 1 CONSERVATION OF' THE C!TY'S EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK. Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable housing stock. Activity 1.1.1: This activity will include the acquisition of restricted, and previously unrestricted, at-risk units. Lead Agency: The SCHDC, with funding assistance by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: Activities will primarily occur in the Redevelopment target area, however, units may be acquired citywide. Resources: (See discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and 'Time Frame:: There are currently a total of 4 apartment complexes, containing 1,096 total units with 504 held as affordable, that were acquired using Redevelopment funds, far exceeding annual and 5-year goal expectations. The complexes include: Sycamore Springs Apartments (96 ,of 240 units), Mountainside Apartments (192 of 384 units), Monterey Village Apartments (112 of 224 units), and Rancho Verde Village Apartments (104 of 248 units). The SCHDC is actively pursuing additional units and expects to obtain between 60 and 150 units, with 50 percent held as affordable, dur'ing the program year. Program 1.2: Acquisition and substantial rehabilitation of existing single-family homes. Activity 1.2.1: This program is part of the NHDC's First-Time Homebuyer Program. The First- Time Homebuyer Program provides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single family homes for low- and moderate-income home buyers, ']'he NHDC anticipates acquiring up to 3 homes for rehabilitation during the program year', This program functions as part of a larger First-Time Homebuyer program and is reported under Objective 4, Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first.-mortgages from Washington Mutual. (See discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, up to 3 homes will be rehabilitated and leased for two years to a household with an income between 45 and 60 percent of the area median family income. (See also Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3,1)~ Activity 1.2.2: The construction of new single family homes for low- and low-moderate income home buyers. Lead Agency: Habitat for Humanity and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: The Northtown target: neighborhood. Resources: Utilizing sweat equity, an $85,000 grant will be leveraged with low interest private financing and volunteer labor and materials to provide home ownership to a household with an income at 35 percent of the area medium family income. (See discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and Time Frame:: By June 30~ 2000, complete the construction of 1 single family home. OBJECTIVE 2 IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW/MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS. Program 2.1: Construction of single family infill development in low/moderate income neighborhoods. Activity 2.1.1: This is part of the NHDC's First Time Homebuyer program which provides newly- constructed single-family homes for low- and moderate-income home buyers. The NHDC has obtained 10 lots for the construction of new homes on infill lots within the Northtown target neighborhood. Lead Agency: NHDC and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: This activity functions through the neighborhood non-profit NHDC, and is focused in the Northtown target neighborhood, Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds with subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Washington Mutual. (See Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3). Accomplishments and Time Frame:: By June 30, 2000, complete the construction of 10 new homes. (See also Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1) OBJECTIVE 3 PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO EXTREMELY LOW AND LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING. Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for future Section 8 and public housing assistance. Activity 3.1.1: The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City in order to apply for Federal funds for Section 8 Housing Cedificates and Vouchers or public housing assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency currently operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 185 are located within the City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to qualified households at affordable rates. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Authority. Geographic Location: These programs are available citywide. Resources: Federal Housing and Urbar~ Development funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Continue to suppod at least 166 Section 8 applicants and 16 public housing applications, annually. Program 3.2: Consider providing additional direct tenant assistance through participation in the County of San Bernardino's HOME Consortium. Activity 3.2.1: The Tenant Based Assistance (TBA) program is offered through the County HOME Consodium and is available to eligible residents. The County has designed the program to provide assistance not only to those who meet Federal preferences, but especially to those who met a "special need." The County targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing security deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available as permanent housing. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development, HOME Consodium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $600,000 allocated to this program. This includes $400,000 in monthly rental assistance and $200,000 in security deposit Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 assistance, Accomplishments and Time Frame: Approximately 6 households should receive assistance by June 30, 2000. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 4 INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE- INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER ASSISTANCE. Program 4.1: Administer First-Time Home Buyer Program-City Sponsored. Activity 4.1.1: The Redevelopment Agency is adrninistering a First-Time Home Buyer program using down payment Assistance Loans. The loan is 10 percent of the purchase price up to a maximum of $16,000.00. The loan is forgiven if the buyer remains in the unit for 30 years. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: This program would be available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds: $300,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, :2000, assist a maximum of 20 first-time home buyers. Activity 4.1.2: The Redevelopment Agency is participant in a 10-city home ownership consortium called the California Cities Home Ownership Authority (CCHOA). CCHOA provides equity for down payment and settlement costs and permits lease periods to be used to establish or reestablish the lease-purchaser's credit reputation. This program assists home buyers who do not currently meet the normal requirement for conventional mortgage financing and do not typically qualify for existing home ownership assistance programs. The lease-purchaser may have household incomes up to 140% of the county median; the maximum home price is $240,000. CCHOA purchases qualified homes selected by approved lease-purchasers. Lease payments accrue in down payment accounts on behalf of the lease-purchaser. The mortgage is later assumed by the lease-purchaser once program components are meL The program is Freddie Mac approved and includes home buyer education and credit counseling. Lead Agency: CCHOA and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Geographic Location: This program would be available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: The 10-cities program will use $70 million to fund first mortgages on a first-come, first-served basis. The 10-cities program issued 2 tax exempt bonds ($70 million for mortgage financing and $7 million for a reserve fund). Sun West Mortgage Company, Inc. is the lender for the program. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, assist a maximum of 30 first-time home buyers. Program 4.2: Administer a First-Time Home Buyer program through the HOME Consortium. Activity 4.2.1: The County of San Bernardino operates the Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) in which households earing less than 80 percent of the median family income may receive assistance in the purchase of a firs'[ home. The HAP provides a silent second trust deed program for low-income buyers. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible ¢esidents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Approximately 4 households should receive assistance by June 30, 2000. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in Rancho Cucamonga. Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program. Activity 4.3.1: The NHDC's First Time Homebuyer Program provides newly-constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes for low- and moderate-income home buyers. NHDC plans to complete the construction of 10 new homes, as well as the rehabilitation of 3 homes. The newly constructed homes are typically sold to income-eligible home buyers earning up to 90 percent of the area median family income. The rehabilitated homes are leased for a two-year period at affordable rents to families earning between 45 percent and 60 percent of the area median family income. At the end of the two year lease period, the tenant will be offered a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to properly maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage. Lead Agency: The NHDC. Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood. Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the Redevelopment Agency that they are able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program. (See discussion of Redevelopment Agency resources on page 3.). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, the sale or lease of 13 newly constructed and rehabilitated homes. h Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 OBJECTIVE 5 REHABILITATION OF THE CITY'S EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING. Program 5.1: Moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile homes for extremely low, low- and moderate-income homeowners. Activity 5.1.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80 percent of the area median family income. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $25,000 and grants of up to $5,000, including emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work, and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure both consistent and efficient results. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: -I'he program is available to eligible applicants citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $325,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, provide assistance to 40 households with incomes below 80 percent of the area median family income. Program 5.2: Consider implementation of a rental rehabilitation program. Activity 5.2.1: This is a program is available to residents or local projects through the County HOME Consortium. HOME funds are available for low interest loans to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing rental property in exchange for affordable rental units. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $25,000 per unit. The HOME assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to low- and very-low income residents. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development, HOME Consortium. Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this program. Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed for assistance during the 1999-2000 program year. The City will' work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 program in Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 6 IMPROVEMENT OF THE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR EXTREMELY LOW- AND LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Program 6.1: Continue to support applications of the Housing Authority for their Annual Comprehensive Grant to enable improvement in living conditions for public housing residents. Activity 6.1.1: Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan. Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Authority. Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide. Resources: Federal Comprehensive Grant: funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Improvements to existing public housing units. · Homeless OBJECTIVE 1 DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE HOMELESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TO ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS. Program 1.1: Continue the support of local homeless facilities and services. Activity 1.1.1: The City currently provides assistance to a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short term shelter. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include: Homeless Outreach, Programs, and Education ('HOPE) This agency provides assistance to individuals and families who are or are at-risk of homelessness and include such services as advocacy, education, shelter vouchers, and referrals. HOPE is located at 213 North Fern Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762'. ' ' 'i" ii i! Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Foothill Family Shelter Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. They are located at 167 North Third Avenue and at 230 and 238 North San Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786. House of Ruth House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunger Program (SOVA) SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelesshess by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits derived from this program occur citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: · HOPE: $6,400. · Foothill Family Shelter: $3,000. · House of Ruth: $7,600, · SOVA: $7,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2000, the following numbers of homeless or near homeless individuals or families will receive assistance: · HOPE - 340 persons. · Foothill Family Shelter-.. 4 families. · House of Ruth -. 1,758 persons. · SOVA -- 1,185 persons. · Homeless Annual Plan The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless a~sistance plan that provides a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. These activities include the support of emergency shelter, shelter' vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who are at- risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for those agencies that provide longer term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. Special Needs OBJECTIVE 1 PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY AND FRAIL ELDERLY, Program 1.1' Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible households with emphasis on assistance to low- and moderate- income seniors, Activity 1.1.1: The City currently funds the Oldtimers Foundation, which provides minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to low- and moderate-income residents and senior citizens. The agency is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Residents who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $100 per visit, and in emergency situations, the allowance of a one-time material charge for up to $250. In addition to household repairs, the Oldtimers Foundation builds exterior handicap ramps for disabled residents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The benefits of this program are available to residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000 (includes $51.45 in funds reprogrammed from FY 97-98, Acct. 9215). Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2000, Oldtimers Foundation will assist at least 80 low- and low-moderate income households. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamon~Ta Page 13 OBJECTIVE 2 PROVIDE SUPPORT WHEN POSSIBLE TO SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS. Program 2.1: Provide support to special need services in areas where there is significant under-served needs. Activity 2.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well- being. To meet additional parking needs for the facility, the City entered into a 5-year lease to utilize the parking lot of an adjacent facility~ lr~ return for the use of the parking facility the City will provide monthly rent, maintenance, and improvements to the parking area. The use of this parking lot is critical to the participation of senior citizen residents utilizing Senior Center programs. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Route. Resources: CDBG funds: $5,000 ,(includes $150.87 in funds reprogrammed from FY 97-98, Acct. 9619). Accomplishments and 'Time Frame:', By June 30, 2000, to have assisted 550 persons through these activities. Special Needs Annual Plan Objectives 1 and 2, as stated above, identify actions the City intends to take over the next program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs. · Non-Housing Community Development Needs OBJECTIVE1 PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES IN ORDER TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW/MODERATE INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS, SENIORS, AND HANDICAPPED. Program 1.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure improvements and sidewalk improvements in qualified target areas. Activity 1.1.1: The City will continue to utili'z:e its resources to fund public capital improvement projects: ......... ii :: ....... Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Rancheria Drive from Grove Avenue to Tapia Via (Construction) The design for this project was funded in FY 96-97. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, aggregate base, new AC paving, trees, sod, replacement walls, fences, drive approaches and landscaping. The improvements are needed to construct curb and gutters where they are missing to improve the drainage of the street and right-of-way. Monte Vista Street from Amethyst Ave.,nue to Archibald Avenue (Design) The City conducted a special survey t:o qualify this area prior to the design of improvements for street improvements being initially funded in FY 97-98. Proposed improvements include the installation of street lights, conduits, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, ramps for the disabled, AC paving, as well as replacing affected walls, fences, driveways and landscaping. The revised design will update previously prepared plans to include sidewalks, thereby providing full street improvements. When completed project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way. Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement in Identified Target Neighborhoods Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Rancheria Drive is located in the Southwest Cucamonga target neighborhood CT 21, BG 2. Monte Vista Street, between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue, is located in a larger area which is not a qualified target area, CT 20.05, BG 1, however, based on staff survey of the area, this street was qualified as a target area and received confirmation from HUD on May 24, 1995. Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7; CT 20.01, BG 4. Resources: CDBG funds: Rancheria Drive: $239,300. Monte Vista Street: $2'1,621..t6 (A total of $27,500 will be available for funding during the program year of which $5,878.84 was initially funded in FY 97-98, Acct. 9721 )i Sidewalk Grinding: $25,000 (includes $10,000 reprogrammed from FY 98-99 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program,. AccL 9833). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, complete the installation of Rancheria Drive improvements, complete the design of Monte Vista Street, and replace approximately 3,900 square feet of sidewalk. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Program 1.2: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Expansion and Renovation. Activity 1.2.1: This will fund the design of this project to provide a better functioning facility. The following design modifications to the Senior Center are proposed: 1 ) Remodel the Mission Room to add a small stage and storage area, 2) Enclose the west patio to create a climate controlled solarium and add an emergency handicap exit ramp to Malvern Street, and 3) Modify the entry corridor and windows to the northeast side of the building to allow public access from the new parking lot and to provide visual security to the building. The Senior Center expansion project includes two activities, design and construction. The design of the center was initially funded in FY 9'7-98 and for this program year seeks additional funds to complete the project design. The construction activity was initially funded in FY 98-99 and identified as a multi-year project where funds will be banked until sufficiently available to allow for completion of the project. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Highway. Resources: CDBG funds: RCSC Expansion/Renovation (Design): $41,408.69 (This $41,408.69 was reprogrammed from FY 98-99 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program, Acct. 9833. A total of $75,830 will be available for funding during the program year of which $34,421.31 was initially funded in FY 98-99). RCSC Expansion/Renovation (Construction): $19,446.50 (This $19,446.50 includes $14,053.51 reprogrammed from FY 98-99 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program, Acct. 9833, and $5,392.99 reprogrammed from FY 97-98 RCSC Parking Lot Expansion program, Acct. 9713. A total of $71 ,'796.50 will be available for funding during the program year of which $52,350 was initially funded in FY 98-99). Accomplishments and Time Frame:: Complete the design for the proposed improvements by June 30, 2000. Program 1.3: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Landscaping. Activity 1.3.1: This project will include the design of landscape and irrigation improvements for the Senior Center. Plans will include the addition of a new meter, as well as replacement landscape material and irrigation equipment throughout the entire site. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Highway. Resources: CDBG funds: $30,000.00 (this includes $28,437.27 reprogrammed from FY 95-96 9th Street Design, Acct. 9316, and $1,562.73 reprogrammed from FY 98-99 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program, Acct. 9833). Accomplishments and Time Frame: Complete the design for the proposed improvements by June 30, 2000. Program 1.4: Metrolink Mechanical Lift for the Disabled. Activity 1.4.1: The design of improvements for the installation of a mechanical lift to improve disabled persons access to the Metrolink Rail System.. Project includes the removal of existing improvements and the construction of a mechanical lift, replacing fencing, and landscaping. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Metrolink Station, Rancho Cucamonga. Resources: CDBG funds: $4,290 (reprogrammed from FY 98-99 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program, Acct. 9833). Accomplishments and Time Frame: June 30, 2000. OBJECTIVE 2 Program 2.1: Activity 2.1.1: including: Fair Housing Complete the design for the proposed improvements by CONTINUE TO FUND LOCAL AND PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES THAT FUNCTION TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOWER INCOME PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. Fund public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority categories, including youth-at-risk, fair housing, landlord/tenant counseling, food distribution, and battered women's shelter as well as job development and recreation opportunities for the disabled. The City will continue to utilize its resources to fund public service agencies, The City contracts with the Inland Mediation Board fo~' Fair Housing services which include education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. This service is provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. iii ...............i~ i1:~: ...... Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page t7 Landlord Tenant Mediation The City contracts with Inland Mediation Board for' Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services. This services is provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762. House of Ruth House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunger Program (SOVA) SOVA offers a 5-day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. YWCA- Y-Teen Provide personal development and societal betterment after-school activities to low- and low- moderate income youth at-risk in a nurturing environment as alternatives and diversions from health threatening and risk-taking behaviors~ This program is run at the Cucamonga Middle School campus located at 7611 Hellman Avenue. This service is provided by the YWCA of the West End, located at 600 North Park Avenue,. Pomona:, CA 91768. YMCA - West End Kids Club Offered to students from low income families attending Bear Gulch School. This activity provides an after-school recreational program.. This service is provided by the West End YMCA, located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730. YMCA - Northtown/Your Own Club The program is run at the Old Town Park and the Villa Del Notre community room and targeted to the Northtown neighborFlood in CT 21, BG 6 & 7. The program is designed to provide at-risk middle school aged youth with fun, educationally enriching and challenging value-based after school alternatives in a safe and enjoyable environment. This service is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition Program The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center' in which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. This service is provided by Oldtimers Foundation, located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335. Rancho Cucamonga Public Libraw - Back to Basics The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. ']'his service is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Benefits from these programs will be provided to residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: Fair Housing: $12,000 (includes $1,739.56 reprogrammed from FY 97-98, Acct. 8187). Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $.10,000 (includes $1,964.90 reprogrammed from FY 97-98, Acct. 9114). House of Ruth: $7,600. SOVA: $7,000~ YWCA: $7,000. YMCA - West End Kids Club:: $6,000. YMCA - Northtown/Your Own Club: .$5,000. Oldtimers Foundation ~ Senior Nutrition: $8,500. Back to Basics - $10,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2000, the following numbers of individuals and households will receive assistance: · Fair Housing - 564 persons. · Landlord/Tenant - 271 households. · House of Ruth ~ 1,758 persons. · SOVA - 1,185. · YWCA - 60 youth. · YMCA - West End Kids Club ... 90 youth~ · YMCA - Northtown/Your Own Club -. 50 youth. · Oldtimers Foundation - Senior' Nutrition - 570 seniors. · Back to Basics - 190 youth. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga OBJECTIVE 3 Program 3.1: Activity 3.1.1: individuals. Lead Agency: ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC STRUCTURES. Installation of handicap ramps at all curb returns. Page 19 FACILITIES AND This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Citywide improvements to all curb returns. Resources: CDBG funds: $21,290 (includes $16,804~38 reprogrammed from FY 98-99 Tapia Via Drive sidewalks program, Acct. 9833). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, .2000, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of curbing for handicap ramps. OBJECTIVE4 PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CITY'S CDBG PROGRAM AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Program 4.1: Continue to fund necessary planning and administrative activities each year. Activity 4.1.1: Includes research and analysis with regard to completion of program applications, performance reports, target area studies~ historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Benefits of the program are eligible citywide. Resources: CDBG funds: $140,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Completion of all administration and program management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 OBJECTIVE 5 TO REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND ELIMINATE ~BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND PUBLIC WELFARE. Program 5.1: Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based paint hazard reduction, end Code Enforcement through the City's Home Improvement Program. Activity 5.1.1: The City currently funds e Home Improvement Program in which, through the course of that activity~ the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucarnonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Benefits of the Home Improvement Program are available to eligible residents citywide. Resources: CDBG funds. Accomplishments and Time Frame: There will be no accomplishments listed separately as improvements will occur for residents eligible for the Home Improvement Program. Program 5.2: Continue to fund a Graffiti Removal Program. Activity 5.2.1: City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents of graffiti. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucarnonga Engineering Division. Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6, and 7 and CT 20.01, BG 4. Resources: CDBG funds: $20,000. Accomplishments and Time Frame:: By June 30, 2000, complete the removal of approximately 14,999 square feet of graffiti. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Program 5.3: Activity 5.3.1: Historic Preservation, The restoration and historic preservation of the Isle House, Page 21 Preservation and restoration activities will include: property acquisition, selective demolition, moving and securing the house, and historical restoration (a multi-year program). This activity will be conducted by the Etiwanda Historical Society. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: The Isle House was previously located at the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, within the right-of-way for the future Foothill Freeway, which is currently under construction. The structure was moved to a temporary location on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, within the vacated railroad right-of-way. A permanent location for the structure has been located, directly north of and adjacent to the temporary location. Resources: CDBG funds: $100,000 (A total of $200,000 will be available for funding during the program year of which $100,000 was initially funded in FY 98-99, Acct. 9835). Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June, 30, 2000, fund Historic Preservation activities that include property acquisition, moving the structure to a permanent location, and the design of improvement plans for the structures restoration. OBJECTIVE6 THE ALLEVIATION OF PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND COMMUNITY REVlTALIZATION. Program 6.1: Review and Evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Activity 6.1.1: Foothill Boulevard, west of Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has primarily new development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along Foothill Boulevard. The City has formed a task force to review the planning and land use issues along Foothill Boulevard. Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. Geographic Location: Approximately 6 miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. Resources: City General Fund. Accomplishments and Time Frame: Through June 30, 2000, continue an analysis of Foothill Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Boulevard with recommendations regarding r'evitalization and land use. OTHER ACTIONS · Economic Development The 5-year Consolidate Plan adopted in 1996 does not include a section providing an Economic Development strategy. However, in 1996 the Redevelopment Agency approved and adopted an economic development strategic plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. That Economic Development Program recently received an '"Award of Excellence" by the California Association for Local Economic Development (CA. LED). Economic Development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life to residents and businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and private partnerships, including private investment in the community. Economic Development activities focus on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. Currently, the Redevelopment Agency has successfully implemented a variety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in the strategic plan that have leveraged the community's attributes as well as establishing a positive business related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, direct mail of newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and Internet web page,, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recognition. Despite this success and recognition, the Redevelopment Agency continues to work to attract businesses that fit the general business environment of the City and achieve a greater presence in the area. The City will continue with these economic development efforts during the 1999-2000 program year. The Redevelopment Agency's marketing and promotion efforts have significantly affected employment, expansion, and the local tax base. In the last year, more than 15 companies expanded and/or relocated as a result of the Agency's marketing and promotion efforts. Simultaneously, these companies increased their employment opportunities and created additional economic activity. Although the City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the Agency's marketing and promotional efforts, the .Agency has managed to facilitate that growth. · Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing In 1984, the City began contracting with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide for the education and enforcement of State and Federal housing laws for all residents who request assistance. Having the IFHMB administer 'the Fair Housing Program assures that there are no impediments to fair housing choices.. "The IFHMB provides public education, mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 In May 1996, the City's Fair Housing Irnpedirnents Analysis was completed and submitted to HUD (a summary of the Impediments Analysis is attached as Appendix"B"). That document established the following strategies as areas where the contracted Fair Housing provider should intensify program efforts. Educate rental property owner's and rnana9ers on their responsibilities under fair housing laws including educational course, newsletters, and workshops. Target the renting populatiorr~ through an ongoing fair housing educational program including public workshops, high school student/parent groups, and adult education.. The IFHMB provides quarterly Fair Housing newsletters which are circulated to apartment owners and renters throughout San Bernardino County, and specifically within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. They also conduct Frair Housing workshops to educate the public on their responsibilities under Fair Housing laws. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, monitor lending practices of major lenders within the City. Track the same lenders Community Reinvestment commitment to improve the City's housing. The IFHMB monitors the lending activities of various banking institutions in the community by tracking lending practices to different ethnic groups and census tracts. The analysis of lending activity is submitted in compliance with the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis allowing for an analysis of each banking institutions' activity. Accomplish media outreach by feature articles and paid ads in local newspapers, radio announcements used for public spots, regular periodic radio programs in Spanish, and providing information to the Community Billboard, in addition to live interviews provided in certain communities. The media outreach program for the dissemination of Fair Housing information is accomplished through air time on the following radio and television stations: KDIF, KVCR, KNSE, KMIA, KWRN, KWRM, KXSB, KXRS. Network with both Federal and State Fair Housing Departments and other related services to assist the complainant. Network with the Association of Realtors and the Apartment Rental Owners Association as technical advisor. Outreach brochures regarding Fair Housin9 issues and upcoming workshops are provided to community agencies located within the City. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Mediate/reconcile complaints of discrimination. Assist complainants in filing charges with enforcement agencies. The Fair Housing program assists low- and low-moderate income persons regarding complaints that require counseling. These complaints include issues of race, color, national origin, familial status, religion, sex, marital status, and disability. Promote April as fair housing month with government municipalities, housing industry, and the general public. The City works with the IFHMB to promote April as "Fair Housing Month." 10. 11. Monitor newspapers for classified advertising which is written in such a way as to discriminate against certain groups in housing. Make recommendations to local governments and review components of any local housing related plan. Provide assistance and network with the County of San Bernardino Housing Authority for the Section $ certificate and w:)ucher program The IFHMB conducts these activities on an ongoing basis. Fair Housing education is provided as a major component of the program with a goal of providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio programming, mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web site. Fair housing enforcement is provided through the process of mediation through the IFHMB or related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housing testing is used as a tool to gather evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing program attempts to accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the community. Obstacles to Meeting Under-Served Needs The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME Funds, in order to better leverage available funding~ Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Actions to Foster and Maintain Affordable Housing A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock. Actions to Remove Barriers to Affordable Housing There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be revised or amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necessary in order to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare. · Actions to Evaluate and Reduce Lead-Based Paint Hazards In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement Federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint. Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of 7, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the Redevelopment Agency also follow the same guidelines. · Actions to Reduce the Number of Poverty Level Families The City has relatively little control over the many factors which may affect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utilized by the City toward this end is the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. Most of the activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. The City, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing will hopefully increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 · Actions to Develop Institutional Structure and Enhance Coordination The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this end is increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also contribute to the programs effectiveness. The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. · Public Housing Improvements Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the CHAS and Consolidated Plan. · Monitoring Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that Federal funds are spent in a manner consistent with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving stated goals. The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the implementation of the CDBG program. Standards Utilized for Review o Is the program meeting intended objectives? o Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and is it capable of carrying out tile responsibilities of its program consistent with Federal requirements? o Is appropriate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner? Monitoring Procedures Construction Projects - All construction projects are expected to comply with Federal labor and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal opportunity requirements required by various Federal and State laws. To ensure this end, CDBG staff developed a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various procedures and steps required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation, preconstruction meetings, and ongoing project inspections. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Subrecipient Agencies - Atl Subrecipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which various scope of work, time line, and docur'nentation requirements are outlined. On a monthly basis, each Subrecipient must submit detaited information regarding the number, ethnicity, and income level of individuals benefitting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of some agencies in which further inforrnation is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter. The City conducts an on-site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the end of the funding cycle. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The preparation of a representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an effective citizen participation process. The City of' Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The following steps were taken to ensure adequate public participation. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published on October 19, 1998, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. Copies of the notice were also mailed to approximately 3.4 individuals and organizations. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall, City Libra~, Senior Center, and Lion's Center. A notice of public hearing regarding the preliminary selection of projects was published on February 15, 1999, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and on February 18, 1999, in the L__a_a Voz newspapers. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. The public hearing was held on March 17, '~ 999. A public notice regarding the availability of the final draft Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan and notice of the final public hearing was published on March 22, 1999, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and on Merch 25~ 1999,, in the La Voz newspapers. Letters indicating document availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the County of San Bernardino, and the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County. Copies of the notice were mailed to approximately 36 individuals and organizations and were posted at City Hall, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. The public hearing was held on April 21, 1999. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix "A" - Page A 1 APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY 1999-2000 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN, The Consolidated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addresses the use of Federal grant/entitlement funds, such as Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, for the purpose of meeting the goals of providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. · PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-year strategy and lists the projects, programs, and resources that will be utilized during the program year. During Fiscal Year 1999-2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive $959,000 in new CDBG funds and reprogram $125,856.35 from previous program years, providing $1,084,856.35 available for funding program activities The sum of all CDBG funds available totals $1,277,506.50, which includes $192,650.15 in prior year program funds. These funds will be used to support the following housing and Community development activities. Project Name Implementing Agency Prior Year I FY 1999/2000 Total Reprogram Allocation Available CDBG Administration Rancheria Drive Monte Vista Street RCSC Landscape RCSC - Exp./Ren. (Design) RCSC- Exp./Ren. (Const.} Metrolink Station Mech, Lift Sidewalk Grinding Administration IRancho Cucamonga Planrang Division Cal~ite!: I~11~rovern*nt: Pmi~ Rancho Cu~monga Engi~'~eering Division Rancho Cu~monga Engi~eering Division Rancho Cu~monga Engineering Division Rancho Cu~monga Engi~:eer'ing Division Rancho Cu~monga Engi{~eerin9 Division Rancho Cu~monga Engineerre9 Division Rancho Cucamonga Engineering DKr'ision $0.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 $0.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 $0,00 $239,300,00 $239,300,00 $5,878,84 $21,621,16 $27,500.00 $30,000,00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $75.830,00 $0~00 $75,830.00 $71,7'96,50 $0.00 $71,796.50 $4,290,00 $0.00 $4,290.00 $10,00000 $15,000.00 $25,000.00 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix "A"- Page A2 Project Name Implementing Agency Prior Year I Reprogram Wheelchair Ramps Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $16,804.38 Isle House Historic Pres. Etiwanda Historical/Society $100,00Q00 Home Improvement Home Maintenance Graffiti Removal Fair Housing Landlord/Tenant Outreach (;enter Emergency Shelter Emergency Shelter Food Distribution Y-Teen Program Youth Activity Youth Activity Senior Programs Food Distribution Back to Basics Home ITnpfovemenkt Pregram Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division $0.00 C)ldtimers Foundati,on $51.45 Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division $0.00 Inland Mediation Board $1,73956 tnland Mediation Board $1,964.90 HOPE $0.00 Foothill Family Shelter $0.00 House of Ruth $0.00 SOVA $O00 YWCA $0.00 YMCA - West End Kids Club $0.00 YMCA - Your Own Club $0.00 Rancho Cucamonga (;ommunity Services $150.87 Oldtimers Foundation $0.00 Rancho Cucamonga Public Library $0.00 i: =:!='li AL $318,506.50 FY 199912000 Total Allocation Available $4,485.62 $21,290.00 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $380,406.78 $695,006.50 $325,000.00 $325,000.00 $9,948.55 $10,000.00 $334,948.55 $335,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,260.44 $12,000.00 $8,035.10 $10,000.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,849.13 $5,000.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $103,644.67 $107,500.00 $959,000.00 $1,277,506.50 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga 07'/3 Appendix "B"- Page B 1 APPENDIX "B" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING A literature search was conducted in several areas; housing discrimination, City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element, the Grantee Performance Report 1994-1995, Federal and State fair housing laws, area demographics, national, State and local housing policies, public housing, 1990 census data, historical racial housing problems in renting and real estate purchases, zoning and discrimination correlation. Surveys were used to accumulate the data base. These surveys were formulated to gather information on housing discrimination, fair housing knowledge, quality of the present housing, and other information which could help housing policy makers to identify problem areas. 2. 3. 4. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data was requested from eight lenders. Eight lenders showed activity within the CitY. Interviews were completed with tenant:s, property management, owners, and Realtors. Additional information and statistical c~ata was contributed by CDBG City staff, County of San Bernardino Housing Authority, California Department of Fair Employment, and the HUD Fair Housing Division, FINDINGS The data compilation identified the following major findings: 1. Discrimination Issues o Lack of understanding fair housing laws/differential treatment. o Unequal terms/differential treatment. o Buyer refusal. o Lenders HMDA data tracking o Tracking lender's housing loans. 2. Housing Issues o Affordable housing (both rental and 'for purchase). o Neighborhood safety. o Housing and rental deterioration in neighborhoods. o Transportation. o Good schools. FAIR HOUSING ACTION PLAN The following plan of action outlines strategies reflecting the survey findings. Workable objectives have been identified in Rancho Cucamonga's Impediments to Fair Housing. The City's contracted Fair Housing provider needs to intensify efforts in the following areas: # Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga Appendix "B"- Page B2 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Educate rental property owners and managers on their responsibilities under the fair housing laws: o Educational courses~ o Newsletters. o Workshops. Target the renting population through an ongoing fair housing educational program: o Public workshops. o High school students/parents group. o Adult education. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, monitor lending practices of major lenders within the City. Track the same lenders Community Reinvestment commitment to improve the City's housing. Accomplish media outreach by: o Feature articles and paid ads in local newspapers. o Radio announcements used for public spots. o Regular periodic radio programs in Spanish. o Provide information to the Community Billboard, in addition to live interviews provided in certain cornmunities. Network with both, Federal and State Fair Housing Departments and other related services to assist the complainant. Network with the Association of Realtors and the Apartment Rental Owners Association as technical advisor. Mediate/reconcile complaints of discrimination. Assist complainants in filing charges with enforcement agencies. Promote April as fair housing month with government municipalities, housing industry, and the general public:. Monitor newspapers for classified advertising which is written in such a way as to discriminate against certain groups in housing. Make recommendations to local governments and review components of any local housing related plan. Provide assistance and network with the County of San Bernardino Housing Authority for the Section 8 certificate and voucher program. CITY PROGRAM The City retains the responsibility of establishing the direction, providing a yearly monitor and evaluating the performance of these various functions. Maintenance and preservation of housing rehabili[ation of the City's substandard housing. o Aggressive marketing of rehabilitation money to rental and home owners. o Housing task force to identify areas needing property revitalization. Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga cP ,./,.5' Appendix "C" - Page C1 APPENDIX '"C" - ATTACHMENTS SUPPORTING MAPS: AREA, PROPOSED PROJECTS, CENSUS BOUNDARIES, Low-MOD INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT SUPPORTING FORMS: FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL NEEDS/NON- HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS CERTIFICATIONS Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga \ ,-,:." ?_,,_,:_,,i ~_, ~. . -:-t' / j ~ ~lnterstate Highway Boulevard ~ / ~ Streets ~ / i ~ · Points of Interest : Points of Interest - By Type ~ Community Lo~tion N · Historic Significance _L School Site .40 0 .40 .80 1.2 1.6 Miles [: r'-I i ~' ~ ' .~'-"! ........., , .....,_. ~ ~ !"*"""~"~1999-2000 CDBG Programs ~ ~- Map Layers ' ~OraffW Ri~¥11 Foothill Boulevard N ~,, ~Ci~ Boundary Streets · Proposed Projects Project Categories · Homeless Programs · Historic Preservation · Infrastructure · Public Facilities -'~ Public Service Programs i Senior Programs · Youth Programs .40 0 .40 .80 1.2 1.6 Miles - mliOT113021 710021 0~07"f0021 2 ~m.,~ mm-~ - '~''I ~071~21 5 ~71~1 I I 060710022029 J Census Boundaries By Census Tract & Block Group ~,, ';City Bounda~ Streets [~Census Tract roup .40 0 .40 .80 Miles 1.2 1.6 [060710020021_--C~ns_u$ Tract 20 02, Block Gm_u~p 11 Map Layers ~ ,,i -ity Boundary N Streets r"'!Census Tract ,-~1BlOck Group Block Group Chart Theme --._._,.J ! I 3000 · 1500 . 750 ~ White ~ Black ~ Amedcan Indian/Eskimo ~ Asian/Pacific Islander ~- Hispanic .40 0 .40 .80 1.2 1.6 Miles ......I LowdViod Income ! I / ,, . Map Layers ;"~ I ~,, jCity Boundary ! !Streets r'~'lCensus Tract _--IBIock Group Block Group Chart Theme: 1 15000 3750 1.2 1.6 Miles . .. : ' - I ; Unemployment :-~ ! i/ Map Layers a~ .... ! ~ ~City Boundary ~ ~ ~" -~ . ~:~ ~ I Streets ,, , ' ~~ ~' i [Bl°ck GrOup Cha~ Theme:2 ' , 10000 j '.:' ~, "~ 5000 ~ ._ ~ ~ (~j> Unemployed ~ .~_o .4o .~o 1.~ I~-- i, ~~,J ~ -- "'- ~' ,,!~'6 Funding Sources Entitlement Grant (includes reallocated funds) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Total $959,000 $0 $0 $0 Prior Years' I~ogram Income NOT previously programmed ew reported CDBG $0 ESG $0 HOME HOPWA $0 Total Reprogrammed Prior Years' Funds CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Total $125,856 $0 $0 $0 Total Estimated Program income Section 108 Loan Guarantee Fund $959,000 $0 $125,856 $0 $0 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $1,084,856 Other Funds $0 Submitted Proposed Projects Totals $1,084,856 Un-Submitted Proposed Projects Totals $0 Continuum of Care: Gaps Analysis - Individuals -- Beds/Units Emergency Shelter Transitional Housing Permanent Housing Total Estinmted Needs [20 to Lo 2O -- Estimated Supportive Services Slots Job Training Case Management Substance Abuse Treatment Mental Health Care Housing Placement Ufe Skills Training -- Estimated Sub-Populations Chronic Substa.-.ce Abusers Seriously Mantally 1ll Dually-Diagnosed Veterans Persons with HIVIAIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Youth Other Categories Asked To Leave By Roommates Job Loss Unable To Pay Rent/Utilities I [0 Io I 14 13 Current Inventory Unmet Need/ Gap f~o t I1o I to t Io t 1o I 1o [ to to io Io f0 Io to lO Io 10 Relative Priority ~High ILow 1o [ t.~,M r Io t INone I Io ! tNone I 10 t tNone t l0 [ INone 1 J0 I INone I I 13 1 o I I :o t ] o ! o I o I I o I I0 ] t4 i0 I 13 t I0 I I? I IHigh INo.e tNone tNone INone I None [None High [H~gh IHigh Continuum of Care: Gaps Analysis - Persons in Families with Children -- Beds/Units Emerger~y Shetter Transitional Permanent Hous'mg Total IEst~J~ated Needs Iavmfio~y io [ to lo ] 6 3 --Estimated Supportive Service~ Slots Job Training Case Management Child Care Substance Abuse Treatment Mental Health Care Housing Placement Life Skills Training -- Estimated Sub-Populations Chronic $ub=tanc? Abusers Seriously Mentally !!1 Dually-Diagnosed · VeM~ns Persons with H!VlAIDS V~_lct!m~-Of Dolliestic Violence Other Categories Asked To Leave By Roommates Job Loss Unable To Pay Refi~/Utitities to ] ~ --it io [o --] Io ~ ' I lo to t to Io . j to io f i3 ~ to t? ] to ] Io t I Io t 3 I io ] Io ] I Io { I Io t [ {o 1 I 1o t t {o Relative IHigh IMed {Low {None I None I None I None { None 13 i IH~gh i0 ! I NO,", {0 I INone t 10 t INOne t l0 t lNone 10 I INone I I t4 I I 13 I ! 17 I IHigh IHigh [High Special Needs/Non-Homeless ~-- Sub-Populations Elderly Frail Elderly Severe Mental Illness Developmentally Disabled Physically Disabled Persons with Alcohol/Other Drug Addiction Persons with HlVlAIDS Priority Need IHigh rMed rMed Estimated $ $40,000 $o $o $40,000 $30,000 TOTAL IS11*3-,GGG Housing Needs Renter Small Related Large Related Need Level Units Estimated $ 0- 30% of MFI IHigh t [356 J I$0 31- 50% of MFt IHigh t [451 I l$o s~- 80% of MF! [Med l [79~ I I$0 0-30%o~MFl thigh t [70 31-50%ofMFI I High ~ I 1105 s~- 80°/0 of MFI I Med It30~ I$o ISO I$o Elderly 0- 30"/0 of MFI [High 31 - 50% of MFI I.~t~ 51-80% ofMFI [Med I$o All Other Owner 0-30%ofMFI [High 31 - 50% of MFr I High 51-80%ofMFl: IMed 1210 r2~t IS66 I$o I$O I$o 0- 30% of MF! H[--~' I 1731 I IS0 31 - 50% of MFI thigh l 19.75 I I$0 51 - 80~ o~Mr-~ tr, h,d I I~,9~2e I I$0 Community Needs -- Anti-Crime Programs Overall Sub-Categories Crime Awareness (05t) Need Level Med Med Units 1 Estimated $ Economic Development Overall Sub-Categories Rehab; Publicly or P~ivately Owned Comm~ (14E) CI Land Acquisition/Disposition (1-7A~ CI Infrastructure Development (17B) CI Building Acquisition, Construction, Re (17C) Other Commercial/Industrial Improvements (17D) ED Direct Financial Assistance to For-Pro (!8A) ED Technic-=! A--ist=nce (18B) Micro-Enterprise Assistance (18C) Need Level Low Low Low Low None Low Units 6 1 0 1 1 1 O 1 1 Estimated $ $1 $0 $1 $1 $0 $1 $1 Infrastructure Overall Sub-Categories Flood Drain Improvements (031) Water/Sewer Improvements (03-J~ Street Improvements (03K) Sidewalks (03L) Tree Planting (03N) Removal of Architectural Barriers (10) Privately Owned U 'tdities (11 ) r--- Planning & Administration Overall Sub-Categories NeedLevel H~h Lo-w I-!rgh High None High Need Level High Units 12 0 1 4: 3 0 4 Units 0 Estimated $ $2,235,001 $0 $1 $1~,050,000 $500,000 $o $685,000 $o Estimated $ $0 Community Needs (Page 2) -- Public Facilities Overall Sub-Categories Public Fac' '~sam~lmprovemonts (Gem~ (l)3) Handicapped Centers (03B) Neighborhood Facilities (03E) Parks, Recreational Facilities (03F) Parking Facilities (03G) Solid Waste Disposal Improvements (03H) Fire St~fionslFq~!ipment (030) Health Fa¢'~ties (031)) Asbestos Removal (63R) Clean-up of Contaminated Sites (O4A) Interim Assistance (06) Non-Residential Historic Preservation (15B) Need Level Meal Mee None Med Med None None Nons Low None Meal Units 5 0 1 1 0 ~) 0 0 1 0 0 1 Estimated $ $552,501 $0 $50,000 $0 $P $1 $2,500 Public Services Overall Sub-Categories Public Services (General) Handicapped Services (05B) Legal Services (0SC) Transportation Services (05E) Substance Abuse Services (05F) Employment Training (05H) Health Services Me. HealthSeryc. es. Scr;ening ~ Lend Da~ed Paifil~ead I lazer (OEP) Senior Programs Overall Sub-Categories Senior Certters Senior Services (05A) Need Level Med Meal None Med Med Med Meal None Meal Need Level High Units T 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Units 2 1 1 Estimated $ $7o, oe6 $1 $0 $1 $1 $1 $1 $ ,oo0 Estimated $ $680,001 Community Needs (Page 3) m Youth Programs Overall Sub-Categories Youth Centers (030) Child Care Centers (O3M) Abused and Neglected Children Facilities (03Q) Youth Services (0$D) Child Care Services (05L) Abused and Neglected Children (05N) Other Overall Sub-Categories Urban Renewal Completion (07) CDBG Non-profit Or9a~tization Capacity Bui (19C) CDBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher E (190) Repayments of Section 108 Loan Principal (19F) Unprogrammed Funds (22) Need Level Meal Low None High Med None NeedLevel None None None None None None Units 6 1 1 0 3 1 0 Units Estimated $ $60,O03 $1 $0 $$0,000 $.1 $0 Estimated $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 IProject ID! Local ID 0001 9215 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project TifielPriorityl Objective/Description 'HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments ' F~nding Sources Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance Program Public Services ContinUe to fund available public service agencies that improve the qbality of life for tower income persons ar,:l those With special needs. 14A Rehab; Single-unit Residential 570.202 80 People (General) CDBG ESG HOME HOP'V'VA Prior Funding CDBG Prowsion of minor and emergency repair grants to se~em and low= or kw-mcdefale income owner occupied households. Ol~imem Fou ._~ is toc.~_._ed at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontaria, CA 9'2335. A total of $/51.4B wtll be reprogrammed from F'Y g7-gB. TOTAL Total Otl3er Funding $ 9,94~ $O $O $O $ 51 $ !0,000 $o Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: 07/01/99 Completion Date: 06/30/D0 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570,500(c) Community Wide IProject IDI Local ID 0032 9106 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description Wheelchair Ramps Infrastructure Provide improvements to public areas and publio fac-dtdes in order to ehhance living environments and improve the quality of life in low- and moderate-income ne~h~ and for lower income' 'md~,'iduals, sen~om: and the handicapped HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments 10 Removal of Architectural Bamers 5704201 (C) 2880 Feet of Public Utilities Funding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Total Other Fund~g $ 21,290 $0 $0 $0 $ 21,290 $0 Retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate d~d~d~d~4ed individuats~ Help the HomeleSs? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility, Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: 07~01 Completion Date: 06/30/00 570.208(a)(2) - Low I Mod Limited Clientele Local Government Community Wide IProject IOl Local ID 9107 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description HUD Ma!rix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments i~unding sources Sidewalk Grinding Infrastructure Provide improvements to publi~ areas and public facilllies in order to enhance living environments and improve the quality of life in low- and rnnderate-imorne ,neighborhoods and for lower income ~uals, ~,eni .ore, and the handicapped 03L Sidewalks 570 201 (c) 3900 Feet of Public Utilities CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Total Other Funding invoives the gtinding, repmr andk~ repiac~3~nt o~ displaced sidewalks in qualir~l target neighborhoods. $0 $0 $0 $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Subrecipient: Localion(s): CT: 0(32001 BG: 4 CT: 002100 BG: 2 CT: 002100 BG: 3 CT: 002100 BG: 6 CT: 002100 BG: 7 County: 06071 County: 06071 County: 06071 County: 06071 County: 06071 Start Date: 07/01/99 Compleiion Date: 06/30/00 570.206(a)(1 ) - Low ! Mod Area Local Government CT & BG's U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD ConsO!idate~d Plan Listing of PropOsed ProjeCts Grafl"~i RemOVal 05 Public SJarvice~ (General;) Public ~i~rvices 570.201 C(~ttin~ te fu~l available public m~tVice agenc~ that improve the quality of life for ~ ir~ome pemons and those w~h special neeUs. 150(~ Feet of Pu~c Utilities TOTAL to~ C~he~ F,Jnd~ng $ 0 T~e remOval of incidents ~ grafrt~i from public Help the Homeless? No start Date: 07/O1/~ Help those Witll HtV Or AIDS? NO Completion Date: ~ Eligibility: 570,20e(a)(1) - Law/Mod Area SUbrecipient: LOCal (3ove~nment LOCation(s): CT & BG's CT: (]0'2001 BG: 4 County: 0~71 CT: 002100 I~G: 30o~nty: 01~71 CT: O021(]O 8G: 6 omlnty: 08071 CT: 002100 8G: 70o[tnty: 0~071 CT: 002100 BG: 20oLmty: 0d071 Iproject ID/ Local ID 8187 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project TifielPriorityl Objective/Description HUD Matrix Cod~/Tifiel Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources Fair Housing Public Services Continue to fund available pubtie service agencies that improve the quality of life for lower in(x~me persons and those with speoiat needs. Fair Housing Activities (if CDBG, then subject to 15% Cap) 570,201 (e) 564 People (General) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Prior Fdnding CDBG Prov'mien of fair houmng service~ including educati0~, COurtseliS, mediation, and _Le,',~ referS. The 5-year a~st apptoxim~ly 470 persons. This ~r, ervice is provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediatien Board located at 1005 Begonia Averide, Ontario, CA 91762. A total of $1,73g.66 will be rel~ogra~med from FY 97-96. TOTAL Total O~her Funding $10,26t $o $o $o $12,000 $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Subrecipient: Looation(s): Start Date: O7/O1~9 Completion Date: O6/3GO3 570.208(a)(2) - Low i Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570500(c) Community Wide IProject ID/ Local ID 9114 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources Landlord/Tenant Coun~ Public Services Continue to fund avalable public servioe agencies that imt~ove the quality o~ life for lower income persons and those with special needs, OSK Tenant/Landlord Counseling 570.201 (e) 27t Households (General) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA P,~rFund.~g CDBG Provision of Landlord/Tenant clispufe mediation services. The 5-yeer C~_~---~ _-~ ~ iden~ th~ ~ program will ~ ai~l~OXimataty 1,8~5 m. This service is provicled by Inland Fatr Housing and Mediation Board, located at 10136 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 9t762. A totat of $1,964.90 wi~ be refxogramrne~ from FY 97-96. TOTAL Total Other Funding $ 8,035 $0 $0 $0 $1,965 $10,000 $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HtV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: 07K)t~ Completion Date: ~ 570.208(a)(2) - Low t Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Pdvate 570.500(c) Community Wide IProject IDI Local ID (x~o7 9214 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description HUD Mal~ix Coderrifle/ ' Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources House of Ruth Public Services Continue to fund available public service agencies that imPrOve the quality of life for lower income persons and 05G Battered and Abused Spouses 570.20!(e) 1758 People (General) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL T~i C'Jlh~..- Funding This service is provided by Houae of Ruth, P.O_ Box 45~, Claremo~, CA 917! 1. $ 7,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 Help the Homeless? Yes Help those with HIV or AIDS? No El~Jibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: 07/01FJ9 Completion Date: 06r3QK30 570.208(a)(2) - Low t Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) Suppresaed iProject ID/ Local ID 9213 U.S, Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Usting of Proposed Projects Project Til~e/Priorityl Objective/Description HUD Matrix code/Tide/ ' Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources' Homeless Outreach, Pro,rams, and E~lucation (HOPE) Continue to fund avaiiel:fie public servi~e agencies ~at imlxove the quality of [~fe for Io~er income pets(ms and 05 Public S~vioes (General) 570.201 (e) 340 Peo~ (C-enera) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL T~at O~her Fundi_ng ~ Pltm 'lG~l',~e~ ~ this ptogl'am will assiat appmxlnlataty 1,205 peruohs. This service ie provided by HOPE, located a~ 2t3 Ninth Fern A~nue, ~, CA 91762 $ 6,400 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 Help the Homeless? Yes Help those with HIV er AIDS? Yes Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: O7/O1/~ ComplYion Date: ~ 570.208(aX2) - Low t Mod Limited Clientele Sut~eciplent Private 570.500(c) Community' Wide IProject ID/ Local ID 93!7 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources Pomona Valley Council of Chumhes-West End Hungel' Program Public Services Continue to fund avatabte pubtic aervioe agencies that improve the quality of life for Io~ver income persons and those with speciat needs. 05 Public Services (General) 570.201 (e) 1185 People (General) CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL To~al Other F'Jnding P~ of a 5day supf~ of food (15 meaie) for alt ~ of a hoiaeho~l. 8OVA helps funilies maintain their health and aveid homelesr,-,e~ by providing ernsrgency food ~ amt *~opp~-t ~. The 5 year Consotk~.___,~_ Ptan ~ that this program will provided by the Pomona Va~ey Council of Chumres-West End Hunger Program (SOVA), located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. $ 7,000 $0 $0 $0 $ 7,000 $0 Help the Homeless? Yes Help those with HIV or AIDS? Yes El~gilmlity: Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: 07,131/99 Completion Date: 06/301190 570.208(a)(2) - Low I Med Limited Clientele Subrecipient Pdvate 570.500(c) Community Wide IProjectlD/ Local ID 0010 9413 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD ConsbliClated Plan Listing of PropOsed Projects Project Title/Priority/ ObjectivelDescriptiO. n, HuD 'Matrix Code/Title/ ' Git~tionlAccOmpli~hments Funding Sources YWCA - Y-Teen Youth Programs Provi~ Improvements to pubic !r~=a~ aM pUbliC facilities in order to enhance living en~rottrmint~ arid ~ ~ __~ and ~ yah _?_~ r.ieds. Ensure ~-c~'--..~y to ~ ~__,b!!c..~ ___~ a~l structureS. 0E~D YoUth Services 570,201 (e) ~ youth CDBG E~G HOME HOPWA TOTAL Total Other Funding 7,000 $0 $0 $0 $ 7,000 $0 youth a-risk in a nuduring environmeat as a!todlatlVes and diveffaiorts from health threatenln~ ~,~a'vio~. Thi~ program is ran at the Cucat~:)~ ~ 8dho~ can'tpus Iooatod on Hellman Avenue. The 5-year C __.~ Plan identlfie~ tha{ this program will ~ ~ 150 pe~sens, Thle sel~ice is provided by the YWCA of the West End, lecated at 600 North Park Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768. Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Su13recipisnt: Location(s): Start Date: 07/D1/G~ Completion Date: 570,208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570,500(c) Addresses 7611 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ipr0jectlD/ Local ID 0011 8185 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects 'Project Title/Priority/ ObJective/De~cript!on. Administration Panning & Administration Provide the neoesaary planning and administrative capacity to implement the Cites CDBG program and tile previaions of the Cor'-,~lida~d Plan. Continue to fund ~ -n,~. Tt~ ~ aria p,::..--qvaiJon of and ____.,.~'.~ic __r~.~em. Tb m==i'-'~ ~ upgrade (~rlrne~ to the health, safay, and public waifare, HUD Matrix Code/Title/" Citation/Accomplishments 21A General Program Admir~isttation 1 PeOple (General) Funding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL To{al Other FUndihg Prowlram aclministration Inclading coordination, implementation, and monitoring of the Citye CDBG program. $ $O $0 $0 $ $o Help the Horneless? No Help those with HIV o~ AIDS? No Eligibility: Subrecipient: Loc~ation(e): Local Government Community Wide Start Date: 07/01A~ Campteflon Date: ~ lProject ID/ Local ID 8189 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Descrtpti. '0, n Home Improvement Proglmm Planning & Administration Provide the nece~__~_,~ery. ptarming and administrative capacity to impleme~ the C. Ay',~ CDBG program and tl~e qualily of life f~r lewer income pemor~ and tl'tose with ~eCial -~, The -'te~...,~ and p,~a,vaaon of nouang contalons, to rxevem and 'e~'~,m~e t~ht and ~jnttng innuen~es, and to etiminae oenaltions HUD Matrix code/ride/ .... Funding Sources Citation/Accomplishments 14A Rehab; Single-Unit Residehtial GDBG ESG 570.202 HOME HOPWA 40 Households (General) TOTAL Total Oth~ FUnding Provides htx~ing r~bilit~ for owner ocoupiecl single family and mobile home uni~. The prg~am offers defen'e~ payme~ loans of U.p te $25,000 and grants or emergency grants :up to $6,033. Service is provided by I:he City's Plartning Division and Building and Safety $ 325,0C0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Su~recipient: Location(a): Start Date: 07~)t/99 Completion Date: 06t30/00 570.2[~(a)(3) - Low / Mod Housing LOcal Government Gommunity W, ide IProject'lD! Loca! ID 0013 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description Foothill Family Shelter Public Services Continue to fund available pubtio servi~e agencie~ tht~t irnpt'ove the queli~y of life for lower inoome persons [11(~e with spe~iat needs. HIJD Matrix Code/~itie/' ""' Funding sources' Citation/Accomplishments (~ Public Services (General) CDBG ESG 570.201(e) HOME HOPWA 4 Households (General) TOTAL T0~al O(,~r Fundi~ A 90-day tta 'nutional ~ for horc-,.t~ fam't~ With chiime~. Support ~ are proVid~ to ~ faro!es to oMain ind~;~m'~lm~,:~ and pemtanent houmng. This servi~e is provided by Foothill Family shelter located at t67 North Third Avenue, SUite K, Uplar~J, CA t~178~. $ 3,000 $0 $0 $0 $ 3,0~O $O Help the Homeless? Yes Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: O7/O1/99 0ompidiOn Date: ~ Eligibility: Subrecipient: Looation(s): 570.208(a)(2) - Low/~ Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 57o.500(c) Addres~ 230 Nodh San Antonio Avenue, Upland, CA @1786 238 North Gan Antonio Avenue, Upland, CA 9t 786 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects lProject ID/ .Local ID (~t4 Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description YMCA - West End Kids Club Youth Programs Provide improvements to public areas and public facilities in order to enhance living environments and improve the qustity of life in low-and moderate-income neig!d3orh(mdsandforl(~e~incomei 'nd~iduats, seniors, and the handicapped. Continue to fund available public service agencies that improve the quality of life for Ensure accessabllit~ to all ~ ~ and structures. HUD 'Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments 05D Youth Services 570.201 (e) 90 Youth Funding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Total Other Funding $ 6,000 $0 $0 $0 $ 6,000 $0 Offered to students from low*income families attending Bear Gulch School. The activity provides an after- school rltcreational program. This sewice is provided by the West End YMCA, located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: 07~1/99 Completion Date: ~ Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): 570.206(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) Addresses 8355 Bear Gulch Place, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ProjeCt ID! .LO ,°al?D , 9619 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ ObJei=, tire ,/De, =cri,tlen. Senior Citizen iSenior Programs PrOvide irr~Ovement$ to pqbtic areas and pub~ fada~ ~n or~l~ to er~mce ~ng enWavn~n~ and ' HUD Matrix Code/~ifie/' '" ' GltationlAccomplishments C)SA Senior Sendices 570.201 (e) 550 Elderly Funding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA PriorFundiRg CDBG TOTAL Total Other Funding Pr:;.,~_. will ~ affordable ,Iow-oo~t ~ oit~en a $100 a rnor~l Jemm a~ wittt the A~mce Leagu~ of Upltl~ to provide ___.~_' p~king af~i~ for C~ of Ran(~p Oucamenga C0mmun~ Service~ Department. A tMal of $15Q87 will be reprogrammed from FY 97-98. $ 4,84e $0 $0 $0 $ !5! $ 5,COo $0 Help the homeless9 No Help lho~e With HIV or AIDS? NO Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(t~): Start Date: 07K)1/I;~ Completion Date: 06/30K)0 570.208(a)(2). Low / Mod Limited Clientele Local Government Addresses 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, CA g1730 IProieotlD/ Local ID 0016 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Cons~Ela{~d Plan Listing of Proposedl Projects project Title/Priority/ O bjeCtJvefDe~ct'l13ti~n' Senior Center - Bx~siaVEe~ (aonltru~tion) PUbtio Facil'd~;,es Provide improy ,ements te pUbl~ areas ~ public fac,'~k~ ~ o~det ~,o e~hanc~ ,vtng ~ .nU HUO' MatriX( c~derrifJei Citation/Accomplishments 03A senior Centers 570201 (c) 1 Public Facillbes 'Fu~lding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Prior Funding CDBG TOTAL 2) En(~oae the We~ Patio to ~e ~i ~tima~ av~ab~ fbr ~l~ng ~u~g me pregram yea~ of w~ich :~2,350 was i~iUally funde~ in FY ~. Total Other Ft~ding $0 $o $o $o $19,4.~ $ !9,446 $0 Help the HOmeless? de Help those ~ HIV or AIDS? I~o Eligibility: SubreCipient: LoCatiOn(S): Start Date: Completion Date: 06/3:~t 570,2(~(a}(2). LOw ) Med Limited Clientele Local GOvernmen{ Add~er~ 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucam0nga, CA 91730 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects IProject IDI Local ID 0017 9621 Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description YMCA - Northtown/Your Own Club Youth Programs Provide improvemeres to public areas and public facilities in orde~ to enhance living environments and improve the ~ __nae~y..'_ of life tn k:~w- and modm'ate-ir'~:~m'~ and the handicapped. Continue to fund avatla131e pubtic ~lervice agencies that improve the quality of life for HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments (:~D YoUth Services 570201 (e) 50 Youth Funding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Tota! Olher Funding $ 5,000 $0 $0 $0 $ 5,000 $0 The program is targeted to the Northtown neighborhood, CT21, BG6& 7. The program is run at the Old Town Park and ~ V'dla Del Norte Community Room. The program is de~,igned to provide at-risk middle school age~ youth with fun, educational, enriching, and challenging valueS-based after-school alternatives in a Plan identifies that this program will assist approxitnately 150 persons. This service is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, located at 1(]97Q Arrow Route, Suite 106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: 07/0t/99 Completion Date: Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) Addresses 10033 Feron Boulevard, Ranche Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ Feron Boulevard, Ranc~h0 Cucarnonga, CA 91730 Project ID/ Local ID 0018 9714 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD COnsOlidated Plan Listing of Proposed ProjeCts Project Title/Priority/ Obje(:tiv~elDescri ptl6n Senior Center - Expanaion/Renovatiml (Design) Pubtic Facilities Provide iniprovements to p~Jbli¢ ar~as ~ public ~43mve the quaay o~ ~ ~ k3w- and .___m.-a,,rae4nca-ne facitltte~ ~hd mre~, dUO I~la~'iA Co(Je/ritJe/ CitatiO, nlAc~compliShments 03A Senior Cehters CDBG 570.201 (c) HOME HOPWA 1 Public FaCilities Funding Sources Priot' Funding C. DBG TOTAL Thi~ program Includes t~e design of ~ tm~ovemlm~ which witl provide a bei~ fudcttontng fac~ lhreugh _~:.~e ,, '~. 1) Remedet the..=_~:_'~. Roe~ to aclt:l a ~ ,~ and ~)a)tage area. 2) En<~toee the We~t Pat~ to er-'.a~e a dimate ramp to Malvem StreeL And 3) IVltxllfy tl~e arttry vteua ~y to ~ m. cdrrent available fOr funding duilng thai program year of which $34,421 31 was initially funded in FY gs.]~. Total Other Funding $o $o $0 $0 $ 4! ,409 $ 4! ,409 $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those With HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: SubreCipient; LoCatiOn(s): Star{ Date: 07/01,9~ Completion Date: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / MOd Limited Clientele bocall GOvernment 979t Arrow Highway, Rancho (~ucarndnga, CA g1730 IProject ID/ Local ID 0019 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description Isle House - Historic Preeervation Planning & Administration Provide the necessary planning and administrative capacity to im~ the City's CDBG program and the provisions of ~ ~~J Plan. Continue to fund quattty of life for Imver irmome pemons and those with _~_~ec~ial_' nM~I~. The restomtien and -pr-~ewatton of at~:l -~..~ .-*::-__ %-es. To r~ and ~ b#ghting ~, and to a#mirm~e cc.-,~.ons detrimental to the hselh, sefa~y, and public wetfare_ and his~MicM re~omtion. The Mmoture was moved out of the Route 3D =orridor to a temporan/._~ on the west side of EtManda Avenue, within the vacated faitroad righ~-of-way. The City C, ounoit apim3ved an adjacent to thetomporary kx:ation. This program isa multi-y~ar pr01~m. that will be completed Ihrough a cooperat~e effort baween the C~ and Etiwanda Historical Society. A total of $200,00C) will be awJisble for funding dudrig the program year of which $tO0,000 was initially funded in FY 9800. HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Citation/Accomplishments 16A Residential Historic Preservation 570.2O2(d) ! Orgar~'ations Funding Sources CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Total Other Funding $100,000 $o $o $o $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: 07~1/99 Completion Date: ~ Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): 570.208(b)(2) - Slums / Blight Spot Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) Addresses 7088 Eftwanda Avenue, Rancho =Cucamonga, CA 91739 jProject ID/ Local ID 9837 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project TiUelPriorityi Objective/Description HUD Mab'ix Codertitle/ Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources Oldtimers Foundation - Senib~ Nutrition Senior Programs Provide improvements to pubtic areas and public facilities in order to enhance living environments and improve l~e ~-_~_ o~ life in low- and ~ s~ructures. 05A Senior Service6 570201 (e) 570 Eidedy CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Tota! Other Funding $ 8,500 $0 $0 $0 $ 8,530 $0 The nutrition program is run from the Rancho Cucamonga Senmr Center, There will be 22,500 hot meats provided at the center and 16,250 meals prepared for home delivery. This service is provided by the Oldtimers Foundation, located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontaria, CA 92335. Help the Homeless? No Help those wifi3 HIV or AIDS? No Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): Start Date: 07/O1/99 Complation Date: 06/30/00 570.206(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Subrecipient Private 570.500(c) Community Wide Project ID/ Local IO 002t U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priori{y/' ObjectivelDe,~riptton H~D Matrix C(~de/Tifie/ Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources Rancherie Ddve (Construction) Infrastructure Provide improvementa to public areas and public [aciliUes in order to enhance living environments and improve the qua~ of life in low- and moder~__-~.ome neighborhoods anql for lower income individuals, seniota, apd the handicapped. 03K Street Improvements 570.201 (c) 1 Feet of Public Utilities CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Tota! Other FundiK)g The ¢om~-t,K:4i~ of I~re~t irrlpr~ for Ranche~ Drive from Grove Avecue to Tapia V'm Drive. The design of thi~ project was funded in FY 96-97, Proposed improvements include the' . .~ of stme~ lights, conduits, cur~, guttam, aive approaches, aggregate fences, and landscaping. The improvements are needed to construct curb and gutters where they are missing to improve the drainage of the street and right-of-way. $ 2-~,~00 $0 $0 $0 $o Help the Homeless? No Help those with HA/or AIDS? No Eligibility: ~ubrecipient: Location(s): CT: 002100 BG: 2 County: 06071 Start Date: 07/01/:J9 Comptstion Date: ~ 570.206(a)(1 ) - Low ! Mod Area Local Government CT & BG's IProject ID/ LOc,I . 972t U,S, Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/DescriptiOn Monte Vista Skeet (Design) infrastructure Provide improvements to public areas and public faclt*~ies in ~(~' fo ent~lnce IMng environments arK] improv~ the qualtly of life in low- and rmxlerate-in(xm~ HOD Matrix Code/Title/ .... Citation/Accomplishments 03 Public Facilities and Improvements (General) 570.201 (c) I Public Facilities 'Funding Sources CDBG HOME HOPWA TOTAL Total Othe~ F,Jndmg $ 21,621 $0 $0 $0 $ 2i,621 $0 Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: 07/01/99 Completion Date: C)6/30a~ Eligibil~: Subrecipient: Location(s): CT: 002~ BG: 1 Cou~lty: 06071 57(].208(a)(1) - Low/Mo~ Area LoCal Government CT & BG's IProject IDI Local ID U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description HUD Malrix Coderrifle/ Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources Senior Center - Landscaping (Design) Public Facilities Provide improvemer~ to public areas and pubtic facil'~ea in order to enhance IMng environments and improve the quati~y of life in low- and moderate4ncome netg~ and for lower income* 'mdwiduals, seniors~ and the handicapped. Ensure accessability to all public faci 'htiea and ~ructures 03A Senior Centers 570. 2Ol (c) I Public Facilities CDBG ESG HOME HOPWA Prior Funding CDBG TOTAL The ~itgn of landscape end irrigation improvements for the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Plafis will include the ~ of a new me~er, as welt as re~_ ~_~n. '~nt ~ ma~eriat attd irrigation equipment throughout the entire site. A total of $3D,(30D will be reprogrammed for tht~ project (this includes $28,437~27 from FY 91~-96, acct. 9316, and $1,562.73 from FY acct. 9e33). Total Other Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Hap the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: 07/01/g9 Completion Date: 06/30/00 Eligibility: Subrecipient: Location(s): 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Local Government Addresses 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 IProject ID/ Local ID 0024 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project TilletPdorityl " ObjectivelDelcrlpl!on HUD Mab'ix Code/Titi~/ Citation/Accomplishments Funding Sources M~rolmk Mechanical Lift for the Disabled Public Facilities Provide improvements to public areas and pUblic facilities in order to enhance living environments and · ._**..~ and for lower income Indiv~_~s._, ~er,~rs, and the ~J.~_. Ensure aceas*~ to all public fac 'lhfies and ~tructures, 03 Public Facilltle~ arid Improvements (General) 570.201 (c) 1 Public Facilities CDBG ES<3 HOME HOPWA TOTAL To~t Other Funding $ 4,290 $0 $0 $0 $ 4,290 $0 the Metraink R.~ System. Projec~ we uematey InclLKte th~ retnoval of -eXiSting improvemerits and the constna3tion of a mechanical lift, replaoeing fencing, and landscaping. Help the Homeless? No Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: O7,10t/e~ Completion Date: ~ Eligibility: Subrecipient: Lecation(s): 570.2136(a)(2) - Low I Mod Limited Clientele Local Government Addresses 250 Azuza Court, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Iproject'lD/ Local ID U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects Project Title/Priority/ Objective/Description HUD Mal~'ix C0de/Titl~/' ' ' "'Funding sources Citation/Accomplishments Back to Basics Public Setvines Continue to fund available public service agencies that improve the quality of life for lower income pensons and those-with special needs, 05D Yo~h Services CDBG $ t0,CO0 ESG $ O 570.201(e) HOME $ O HOPWA $ O 190 Youth TOTAL Total O{her F'Jnding The Back to B__.~.i~.__ program trains Volqntee~ tutors to w~3rk with 7 to t2 year old c.,'-',~Lin pa~nn~ a~ at-r~k (c~'~'~3~-.-- ~ and tooriga Pub~ L~'ary, k3ce~t at 7368 Archibald Avennde, Raricho Cuc, atTtonga, CA g1730. $10,000 $0 Help the Hornetess? No Help these with HIV or AIDS? No Start Date: 07,91/1a9 Completion Date: 06/30,~33 Eligibility: Subrecipierlt: Looation(s): 570.206(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele Local Government Addresses 7368 Archibal(l Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any' impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard. Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at: 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs. Drug Free Workplace -- It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about - (a) (b) (c) (d) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph I that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will - (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include tile identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 3(:) calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted - (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1,2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Anti-Lobbying -- To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation., renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Authority of Jurisdiction -- The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan -- The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 -- It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135~ Signature/Authorized Official Mayor Title April 21~, 1999 Date Specific CDBG Certifications The City of Rancho Cucamonga certil=ies that: Citizen Participation -- It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR Part 91.105. Community Development Plan -- Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both shod-term and long-term community development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income (See 24 CFR Pad 570.2 and 24 CFR Pad 570). Following a Plan -- It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria: Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); Overall Benefit. The aggregate use of' CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans during program years 1999-2000, shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period; Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in pad with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate~income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force -- It has adopted and is enforcing: A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction, Compliance With Anti-discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. Lead-Based Paint -- Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 570.608. Compliance with Laws -- It will comply with applicable laws. Signature/Authorized Official Mayor Title April 21, 1999 Date OPTIONAL CERTIFICATION CDBG Submit the following certification only wher~ .one or more of the activities in the action plan are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified in 24 CFR Part 570.208(c): The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically identified CDBG-assisted activities which are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. Signature/Authorized Official Mayor Title ~April 21, 1999 [}ate Specific HOME Certifications The HOME participating jurisdiction certifies that: Tenant Based Rental Assistance -- tf the participating jurisdiction intends to provide tenant-based rental assistance: The use of HOME funds for tenant-based rental assistance is an essential element of the participating jurisdiction's consolidated plan for expanding the supply, affordability, and availability of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing. Eligible Activities and Costs -- It is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and costs, as described in 24 CFR Part 92.205 through 92.209 and that it is not using and will not use HOME funds for prohibited activities, as described in § 92.214. Appropriate Financial Assistance -- Before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate the project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not invest any more HOME funds in combination with other Federal assistance than is necessary to provide affordable housing. Signature/Authorized Official Mayor Title April 21, 1999 [:)ate APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS: A. Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,00(:)and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. B. Drug-Free Workplace Certification By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification. The certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free Workplace Act. Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need not be identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in the grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of application, or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to'identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant, the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three). The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino, CA 91730 Check v' if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here. The certification with regard 'fo the drug-free workplace is required by 24 CFR Part 24, subpart F. Definitions of terms in the Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and Drug-Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees' attention is called, in particular, to the following definitions from these rules: "Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 USC 812) and as further defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15); "Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any controlled substance; "Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the performance of work under a grant, including: (i) All "direct charge" employees; (ii) all "indirect charge" employees unless their impact or involvement is insignificant to the performance of the grant; and (iii) temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of' work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee (e.g, volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces). CIY¥ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF PrigPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF QUAKES REOUEST FOR CITY TO WAIVE FEES AND SUBSIDIZE A PROPOSED FOUR-DAY BASEBALL CLINIC RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council consider the Quakes request to waive fees for a proposed four-day baseball clinic. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On March 3, 1999, City Council approved a Resolution which adopted facility rental fee waiver and City service charge waiver policies for the Epicenter. The Resolution sets a two tiered criteria structure which allowed for analysis of fee waiver and subsidy requests. ( I ) Waiver of customary rental fees. (2) Waiver of City's direct costs which are incurred in the production of the event. Based on the information that was presented to C!ity staft by the Quakes, their request does not qualify for waiving of City fees for the following reason: A) Facility rental waiver as reduction criteria 2) The organization must be a nonprofit organization B) Waiver of direct City service charges 1) All of the above criteria must be met~ 7) The proposed event will not conflict: with similar events. 8) The proposed event is not designed as a profit making activity. The Resolution is attached tbr your review. JBF/dja Attachment (Resolution No. 99-049) RESOLUTION NO. 99-049 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF :RANCHO cUCAMONGA ADOPTING FACILITY RENTAL FEE WAIVER AND CITY SERVICE CHARGE WAIVER POLICIES FOR THE EPICENTER RECITALS. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the provision of certain community activities by private parties at the Epicenter and it's related facilities (Facility) would be beneficial to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the citizens therein. Such community activities will be beneficial only if they are consistent with the goals, objectives, and vision of the City's Community Services Department. The City Council is desirous of establishing content neutral cdteda that can be applied to any requests for waiver or diminishment of Facility Rental Fees and Direct City Service Charges customarily imposed by the City. It is the purpose of this resolution to establish the applicable criteria. (ii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in Part A, Recitals, which are hereby incorporated by reference, herein. 2. The following criteda and standards shall be applied by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in response to requests for waiver of City imposed charges for Rental Fees and Direct City Service Charges applicable to events conducted by private parties at the Epicenter (Facility): a. Facility Rental Fee Waiver or Reduction Criteria. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may, upon request by a qualifying entity, waive or reduce Facility Rental fees and charges in accord with the following criteria: 1. The entity requ:esting relief from the Facility Rental fee uses charge conducts substantial business activities within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The entity is property formed California non-profit organization holding a current City business license. Resolution No. 99-049 Page 2 The event for which the facility is to be used ancl for which the Facility Rental fee waiver is requested is: (i) not limited in attendance on the basis of any discriminatory criteria; (ii) is not designed or intended to solicit, encourage, to persuade, or induce either membership into the sponsoring entity or financial support thereof, and; (ill)is intended and planned to appeal to and benefit all residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The event is not anticipated to: (i) cause foreseeable physical damage to the Facility or (ii) impair the use of the Facility by other uses except upon the days for which the event is to occur. be Waiver of Direct City Service Charqe for Community S;3ecial Events. The City Council may additionally, in its discretion, reduce or waive charges for Direct City Services imposed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga up)on its determination that a Community Special Event is being offered to the City's residents. The criteria applicable to such waiver is as follows: 1. All cdtena set forth in Section 2a hereinabove are satisfied. 2. The proposed Community Special Event will provide a direct and tangible benefit to a program or service offered by City. 3. That the activity will not unreasonably subject the City to foreseeable liability for, or arising from, the conduct of such events. 4. That the sponsoring entity will positively identify and advertise the event and the City of Rancho Cucamonga on a regional or greater scale and the Community Special Event is of a nature that will convey a positive image for the City. 5. That the event is designed, intended, and organized in a manner that will either result in the substantial patronage of a significant number of businesses located within the City and/or involve participation of numerous community organizations. 6. Will offer the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga opportunities to participate in unique community activities and events that are not otherwise available within the City by or through the City or' any other private party. 7. That the event is not in conflict with or similar to any other event that the City is participating in or assisting in any manner. Resolution No. 99-049 Page 3 8. That the event is not designed or intended to produce or result in a profit for any involved entity. · 3. The entity requesting such relief in conformance with the above policies shall submit, in writing, to the City credible information that it believes will support the City Council making the findings required for each waiver or fee reduction. The City may request any further reasonable information that it deems necessary or desirable from the applying entity in order to assist in the City's determination as regards said request. Incomplete requests will not be presented to the City Council for consideration. 4. The City Council witl not waive or reduce (i) any required Security/Damage Deposit, (ii) any insurance requirements or, (iii) applicable taxes. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3'" day of March, 1999. AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None William J. AlexaF~ler, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adah~, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 3r~ day of March, 1999. Executed this 4'" day of March. 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CH'Y ()F RANCH()CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members o:f the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. F'ulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY (ACE) TO CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT II LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the transfer of ownership of the American Cable Entertainment (A.C.iE.) Company, LLC to Charter Communica:tions Entertainment II LLC and approve the resolution authorizing and consenting to the transfer of control of a cable television franchise by A.C.E.C. holding company, LLC to Charter Communications Entertainment II. BACKGROUND Since October 1, 1998, American Cable Entertainment has provided cable service to nearly 23,000 Rancho Cucamonga residents. Earlier this year, American Cable Entertainment agreed to sell its cable system to Charter Communications, an experienced cable operator~ On July 29, 1998, in St. Louis, Missouri, Investor Paul G. Allen entered into an agreement to acquire the nation's tenth largest cable operator, Charter Communications in a $4.5 billion transaction. The company, which was integrated with Allen's other cable investment, Marcus Cable, joins Allen's portfolio of investments in new media, entertainment and technology companies. This transaction represents Allen's largest personal investment to date. ANALYSIS In adherence to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) current regulations, A.C.E. and Charter have jointly submitted a copy of FCC Form 394 required for the legal transfer of ownership from A.C.E. to Charter. After reviewing the FCC form 394, the City found that Charter has legal, technical and financial ability to operate and maintain the American Cable Entertainm~mt system. Upon the approval of the transfer of ownership, Charter assumes all rights, duties, and agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and assignor (AC.E.) As ex ~ressed in the City's current Cable Television Franchise Agreement. Respectfully submit, ( ~_erry B. !i:ulwood ',/Deputy City Manager JBF/dja Attachment APR-12-19951 15:36 FROM Richards= {,~al~"'~', ,?~ Ge~,~k~on TO !9~9~9728~6 P.02x07 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING AND CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE BY ACEC HOLDING COMPANY, LLC TO CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT I I, LLC R~CiTALS: A. American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, doing business as American Cable Entertainment ("Franchises.), is the duly authorized holder of a franchise ("Franchise") that was originally granted to the Franchises by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council ("Franchise Authority") under a cable television franchise agreement that was approved by Resolution No. 99-083 adopted on April 7, 1999. B. The sole member of the Franchises is ACEC Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Transleto'9"). The Transferor desires to sell, assign, and transfer its membership interest in the Franchises to Charter Communications Entertainment II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Transfetes"), thereby transferring the ownership and control of the Franchises, which will continue in existence as the authorized holder of the Franchise. C. On March. 2, 1999., the Franchise Authority received from ~he Transferor and from the Transferee an application for the Franchise Authority's consent to a transfer of control of ~he membership interest in the Franchises. This application was made on FCC Form 394 entitled "Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment Or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise." D. In accordance with Section 7.02.100 of Chapter 7.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority has the right ~.o review and to approve the financial, technical, and legal qualifications of the Transfetes, Charter Communications Entertainment II, LLC, in con~ection with the proposed transfer of control of the membership interest in the Franchise. E. The staff of the Franchise Authority has reviewed the documentation =hat accompanied and supplemented FCC Form 394 and, based upon the representations set forth in tha~ documentation, has concluded that the proposed Transfetes has the requisite t2IPR-12-199S 15:36 FROI"I R~.char"ds I,~i~,t.s;o~"~ g Ge~shon TO 190947?2846 P. EI3/07 financial, technical, and legal q%/a!ifications to adequately perform, or to ensure the performance of, all obligations required of the Franchises under the Franchise, and that the Transfetes will be bound by all existing terms, conditions, and obligations under the Franchise previously granted to the Franchises. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.. In accordance with Section 7.02.100 of Chapter 7.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code, the Franchise Authority consents to and approves the following transactions: A. The proposed sale, assignment, and transfer of the membership interest in ~he Franchises by the Transferor to the Transfetes. B. The Tra.nsferee's pledge of, and grant of a security interest in, the membership interest in the Franchises, as well as the Franchise and all rights of the Transfetes related thereto, to the Transferee's lenders for the purpose of securing any indebtedness of the Transfetes. C. The exercise by any secured party of its rights as a secured party upon a default by the Transfetes in the payment or performance of any indebtedness or obligations secured thereby; provided, however, that such consent does not constitute a waiver of the Franchise Authority's right to approve any subsequent sale, assignment, or transfer of the membership interest, or any subsequent sale or transfer of the cable television system, or any subsequent transfer or assignment of the Franchise. Section. 2. The authorization, consent and approval of the Franchise Authority tO the transactions referenced above in Section 1 is conditioned upon compliance by the Franchises or the Transferee with the following requirements, as to which they are jointly and severally responsible: A. The Franchises and the Transfetes will execute and file in the office of the City Clerk an "Assumption Agreement" in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A to this resolution. The Mayor is authorized to execute that document and thereby evidence the written consent of the Franchise Authority to the Transferee's assumption of all rights and obligations under the Franchise. B. An original or conformed copy of the written instrument evidencing the closing and consummation of the proposed sale, assignment, and transfer of the membership interest in the Franchises must be filed in the office of the City Clerk within 30 days after that closing and consummation. APR-J2-1999 15:~? FROM R:~char'ds bb. ts:or'. 8, Ge~hon TO 19094 ?:.846 P.04/07 C. The Franchise Authority will be reimbursed for all ¢ost~ and expenses reasonably incurred by the Franchise Authority's staff in processing and evaluating the information relating to the proposed ~a'm:~sfer of control of the Franchise; provided, however, that those costs and expenses will not exceed the sum of $ and will be se~ forth in an itemized statement transmit=ed by the City Manager, or the City Manager's desi~u, to =he Franchisee anG the Transferee within 30 days after the effective date of this Resolution. $_eqtion 3~ Nothing con=ained in this Resolution may be construed to ex=end the term of the Franchise, which will terminate in its en=irety on April 6, 2002, unless extended following the Franchisee's completion of the cable system upgrade as provided for in the ~able television franchise $gction 4. The: City Clerk is dir~ct. ed to transmit a certified Copy of this resolution ~o the following persons: Bruce A. Armstrong President and C~O American Cable Entertainment Company, ~LC Four I,an~mark ~quare, gui~e Stanford~ Connec=icu~ 06301-2502 Trudi McCotlum Foushee Vice President and Senior Counsel Char=er Communications Enter=ainmenu II, LLC 12444 Powerscourt Drive, SUi~ 400 St. Louis, Missouri 63131-3660 .Section 5. The City Clerk is directed =o certify to th~ pa~a~c and =4option of thi~ resolu~ion. PA~SED, APPROVED, ARD ADOPTED ~:,h&S day oZ · 1998. ATTEST: ~fAYOR CItY CL~KK APPROVF2D AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 99041.2 ]123~,-00001 ~ly~: 0593991 0 APR-12-1999 15:_~? FRO~I Riohard~ [~la't,'~o,'~ ~ Ge~?d~,on TO 1909~?728~46 P,05/07 EXHIBIT A ASSUMPTION AGREEMF~NT (CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT) THIS ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day' of , 1999, by and between ACEC Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Transferor"), Charter Communications Entertainment II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Transfetes"), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation ("Franchise Authority"). ~ECITALS: A. Transferor is the sole member of American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which is the authorized holder of a franchise that authorizes the construction, operation, and maintenance of a cable television system within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. That nonexclusive cable television franchise will expire by its terms on April 6, 2002, unless extended following the Franchisee's completion of the cable system upgrade as provided for in the cable television franchise agreement. B. Subject to the prior consent of the Franchise Authority, Transferor desires to sell, assign, and transfer to Transfetes its membership interest in American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC. C. Transferee desires uo assume all rights, duties, and obligations under that certain cable television franchise agreement between the Franchise Authority and American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC, that was authorized by Resolution No. 99-083 adopted on April 7~. 1999 ("Franchise Agreement"). THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. Transferor sells, assigns, and transfers to Transferee its membership interest in American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC. 2. Transfetes covenants and agrees with Transferor and with the Franchise Authority to assume all rights and to assume and perform all duties and obligations of American Cable Entertainment Company, LLC, under the Franchise Agreement, including those duties and obligations that were required to be performed prior to the closing and consummation of the proposed sale, assignment, and transfer of the membership interest. 3. Franchise Authority consents to the sale, assignment and transfer by Transferor to Transferee of the membership in=erest, conditioned uDon the Transferee's assumption of all rights, duties, and obligations specified in the Franchise Agreement. TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused this Assumption Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth below the authorized signature. ~"TRANSFEROR" ACEC HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By:_ Title: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Legal Counsel ~"TRA/~SFEREE" CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS · NTERTAINMB%~T II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Title: Da%e: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Legal Counsel [Signatures continue] RF:'R-12-1999 15:38 FROM R tchar"d~ [~t.~.:~:lDt,'", ~ 13eps~',,on TO 19£1c::j4??2846 P. 07/'0"? "FRANCHISE AUTHORITY" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California municipal corporation Mayor Date: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City ~torney 990512 11'~2,:k-.000~1 $¥c 0593~1 0 A - 3 TOTRL P. o7 - CITS' (')F RA\'CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of' the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Paula Pachon, Management Analyst tl SUBJECT: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Stadium: · The Paint and Stucco Project at the stadium went to bid on 3/16/99. We have received responsible low bidders for this project. Accommodations ,,viii be made to conduct the work around the Quakes game schedule.. CPW has completed the Cross-aisle Waterproofing Project at the Stadium. Several layers of plastic coating were applied on the cross aisle and areas above The Quakes have requested that the City reserve parking lot "F" for Quakes and City staff parking only. A parking permit will be required to park in lot "F". Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center: · The emergency power back-up test was successhilly completed on the portable back-up generator located at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center on 3/17/99. · The steam table in the kitchen was repaired. Lions East and West Community Centers: · Wall guards and corner guards were installed. Bear Gulch Park/Arbor l)ay: · Rancho Cucamonga received its 10"' consecutive Tree City USA designation. In celebration of Arbor Day, 30 third graders from Bear Gulch Elementary School helped plant 5 Sycamore trees at Bear Gulch Park on March 17. Prior to the tree planting ceremony the students selected names for each of the five trees. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 21, 1999 Page 2 Central Park: - A Task Force meeting was held on Tuesday, April 20th at 6 discussion of the survey results. Agenda items included a City llall: ' The Security System Upgrade Project went to bid 3/17/99. We have received responsible low bidders for this project. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: o The annual Sprin~ Fling was held on Thursday, April 1, 1999, at the Senior Center. The event was very successful with over 150 in attendance including the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tern. Activities included entertainment by the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Chorale, door prizes, games and refreshments. This event was co-sponsored by the Community Services Department and tim VIP Club. The Senior Advisory Committee will hold its next meeting on April 26, 1999 at the Senior Center. At the time this report was prepared the agenda for the April meeting had not been set. Several new senior classes will be added to the list of offerings for senior citizens beginning in April. New classes include: Ceramics,. Introduction to Computers, Tai Chi, Genealogy, Autobiography, Beginning Bridge Instruction, and Senior Fitness. The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center will be joining the nearly 600 other centers serving seniors in California on Saturday, May 15 t¥om 8100 a..m. until 11:00 a.m. by participating in the "Step Out for Senior Centers". This year's event will focus on healthy seniors and will include a free breakfasll, health demonstrations, entertainment and door prizes. A Cinco de Mayo celebration will be held at the Senior Center on Wednesday, May 5th from 10:45 a.m. until 11:15 a~m.. This will be a mini-event featuring traditional refreshments, entertainment and fun. · A senior citizen billiards tournament is scheduled for June 11'hat I 1:00a.m. atDave& Busters at the Ontario Mills Mall~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 21, 1999 Page 3 Teens: · The Teen Center extended its hours during the spring break. The Center continues to be a popular hangout for teens, with the greatest attendance occurring on Friday afternoons and evenings. The Center will extend its hours to full days beginning June 14th. Staff is starting to plan for great summer activities. The Center hosted a "March Madness" sports challenge at the RC Family Sports Center on March 27'h. Teens competed in basketball, wallyball and indoor soccer. They also participated in a mini-tournament in billiards and ping pong. On April 30'h the Center will feature an all night movie marathon. In May, the event of the month will be a karaoke night. The end of June, is slated for a video ganm tournament. Spring Break Frenzy featured two popular beach trips and an excursion to Knott's Berry Farm. In addition to the extended hours at the Teen Center, our trips gave youngsters great options on how to spend their spring break. Staff is gearing up for the summer trip program to include beach trips and amusement parks. Our education Teen Workshop Series continues. Over one hundred (100) teens attended the Job Skills Workshop on March 27'h.. May will feature the much anticipated Financial Aid Workshop. The idea for this workshop was generated t¥om requests from attendees at the City's popular college fair. The Financial Aid Workshop will focus on grants, student loans, scholarships and a general discussion on planning fin. ancial aid for college. A Family Safety Workshop was held on April 2(7h at Lions Center East. The Workshop was presented in conjunction with the Disaster Preparedness Division, the Fire Safety Division, Engineering, Police and Community Services l)cpartment. Each family received a free tote bag filled with valuable safety tips and infornmtion. In. addition, the Environmental Learning Center was open during the workshop to provide activities for children. The Teen Leaming Center (TLC) began accepting applications in March for summer volunteer positions. As in the past, the demand for this program is very high. Applicants are screened and interviewed in March, April and May. ~"~ June, they are placed into a variety of summer volunteer jobs based on their interest and availability. Jobs include youth counselors for Day Camp, Kinder Camp and Kid Explores, and classroom aids for Play Camp. Last year 50 teens volunteered more than 3,000 hours of service through this program. ]'he Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) meets monthly at Lions Community Center East and has extended, by popular demand, its babysitting program from twice monthly, October through May, to every other week year round. ]'he TRAC program is gearing up for a busy summer of snack bar operations. Youth Activities: o Playschool has reached its highest enrollment in several years. In 1995/1996 - 377 children were enrolled in the program; 1996/97 - 367 youngsters were enrolled; 1997/98 - 323 children were enrolled; and in 11998/99 457 children are currently enrolled in our program. This increase is partially due to the expansion of the program to include the Mulberry Learning Center CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 21, 1999 Page 4 and the addition of the new 'Ready Readers' class. In April, early enrollment for those returning to the Playschool program in the Fall began. Registration for Play Camp, the popular summer version of the Playschool program, began in mid-March Twenty-eight (28) classes will be offered that can serve over 500 children through tile course of tile summer. Registration also began in March f;or Day Camp and Kinder Camp. Both of these Camps are offered for nine (9) weeks during t/le summer and can accommodate a total of 65 children per week. This year the Camps will move to Jasper Elementary School (part of file Alta Loma School District) due to construction at Carnelian Elementary School. Tile third annual Spring Children's Concert was held on Saturday, April 3'd at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium. This free concert was designed as a family interactive musical event. This year, the headline performers were E-Rock for Kids, a 9-piece band and performance ensemble that plays original children's music. All youngsters attending the concert were given a cool pair of brightly colored sunglasses. Rancho Grande Kiwanis Club assisted with tile event by helping set up and ushering at the community event. Youth Sports: · Pee Wee Soccer began playing on April 14~*~. There are nearly three hundred (300) 3-5 year old boys and girls participating on 24 teams. The program takes place at Victoria Groves Park, Monday through Thursday from 6:00 p.m until 7:00 pro.. · Youth Roller Hockey continues playing their regular season games through May 19'h. Playoffs will begin following the conclusion of the regular season. Over two hundred and twenty (220) boys and girls, ages 5-15 are participating on 25 teams this Spring season. · The City was well represented in the lnland Valley Municipal Athletic Association's Tournaments for Youth Basketball. In the girl's division, the City placed 2"a in the "B" Division. In addition, girl's teams from Rancho Cucamonga captured the consolation championships in Divisions "C", "B" and "A". In the boy's Division "B", the City placed 2% Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center: · The City hosted the Inland Valley Municipal Athletic Association Boys "A" Division Basketbal I Tournament for the first time on March 20 & 2 I, 1999. One hundred and forty (140) boys ages 12-13 participated on 14 teams Close to 700 :spectators from Riverside, Fontana, Norco, Montclair, Corona, Chiino, Rialto and Rancho Cucamonga visited the Center. Citizens from tile surrounding communities marveled at our beautiful facility. The staff at the RC Family Sports Center were just as impressive with their outstanding customer service skills. Many in attendance mentioned that both the Center and the staff were such impressive hosts. Youth Indoor Soccer continues with league play through April. Over one hundred and thirty-six (136) children, ages 5- i 4 are participating. The Adult Basketball Lea.~ues conclude with playoffs in April. Over one hundred and forty-four (144) men and women are participating on 18 full court teams. Fifty (50) men are participating on 10 teams in the Three-on-Three Basketball LeaRues. CITY COUNCIL STAFF' REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIF. S [JPDATE April 21, 1999 Page 5 The facility continues to be extremely busy. During the month of March, 1999, facility usage for open/drop-in play was as follows: Adult Basketball - 1,529; Youth Basketball - 544; Adult Racquetball - 578; Youth Racquetball - 58; Adult Volleyball - 123; and Youth Volleyball - 19. The Sports Advisory Committee met on April 14th. Field allocation materials were submitted for the Fall/Winter (August 1, 1999 through January 31,2000) season. Future attendance trends for youth sports groups xvas discussed. A narrative of the general growth expectations will be developed to prioritize the need for ball fields. The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled for May 12% At that meeting staff will present their proposal for field allocation for Fall/Winter. Adult Sports: · Two thousand, three hundred and thirty-six (2,336) men and women are participating on forty- six (46) Adult Softball League teams. · Two hundred and forty (240) men and women are participating on twenty-one (21) Adult Six- Aside Soccer teams. · Over four hundred (400) men and women are participating on twenty-three (23) Full Field Adult Soccer teams this season. · Adult Flag Football has one hundred and twenty (120) men participating on 15 teams this season. Senior Transportation Program: · Discussions between staff and the YMCA continue to monitor the usage of the senior transportation program. All indications are that the program is extremely well received by the community. Marketing information concerning the progran~ has been included in the YMCA's newsletter, the City's quarterly ncwslettcr, The Grapevine, and the Silver Fox, the monthly newsletter for seniors produced by the City's Senior Center. In addition, notices have recently been placed on the City's public television access channels. A detailed report on ridership for the senior transportation program t~)r its first quarter of operation will be submitted to the Council in May. Trips and Tours: The following trips are scheduled during the reporting period: · Flower Fields of Carlsbad - April 7, 1999. This tour started with lunch in San Diego at the famous Tom Ham's Lighthouse Restaurant overlooking the harbor. Participants then viewed one of the most spectacular flower displays in the world. Separated into ribbon-like bands of color the blooms created a 'sea of flowers', as far as the eye can see. (Trip was sold out) · Lawrence Welk Dinner Theater - April 18, 1999. Upon arrival at the resort, guests will be treated to a sumptuous buffet luncheon. Afterwards participants will enjoy the live stage performance of "Damn Yankees". · Nixon Presidential I~ibrary and lunch at Knott's t½erry Farm - May 12, 1999. Participants will visit the Presidential Library, the First Lady's Garden and the restored farmhouse where President Nixon was born and raised. Lunch and shopping at Knott's Berry Farm will follow. (Seats are still available) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 21, 1999 Page 6 Catalina Island - June 12, 1999. This one day trip to the enchanting Catalina Island offers the tour miles of unspoiled countryside where buffalo, wild boar, deer and bald eagles roam freely. The quaint town of Avalon with its cobblestone streets, set in the beautiful background of canyon mountains and the Pacific, offers young and old alike the chance to enjoy shopping, snorkeling and a variety oftours. (Seats are still available) Staffhas entered into a working relationship with Gadabouts Tours to offer community members the opportunity to participate in a wide variety of multi-day trips and tours. The City will receive a percentage of the fee for each participant in the program. Some of the upcoming multi-day trips include: Sequoia & Lake Tahoe (departs August 22n'~; 6 day trip), Lake Powell and Canyonlands (departs September 8th, 8 day trip), Calitbrnia Amtrak Odyssey (departs September 26th, 6 day trip). Human Services: · A Women's Wellness Lecture will be held at the Senior Center on Tuesday, April 27% Dr. Anita Kundi will provide a free woman's wellness lecture on Stress Management. She will cover issues relating to the symptoms ofstress, the medical ramifications and the physical side effects. Dr. Kundi will also address dealing with anger and worry. · 55 Alive Mature Driving is a monthly class offered to seniors which when successfully completed will qualify the participm~t for an auto insurance discount. The next 8 hour class will be held on May 4 & 5 at 12:45 p.m.. to 4:45 p.m. at the Senior Center. A Better Breathers Program will begin in late May at the Senior Center. This worthwhile program is a support program for people with respiratory problems that will include guest speakers and guidance on creating a higher quality of life. A facilitator will be provided through Heritage Hospital. This program will be co..sponsored by the Community Services Department, the American Lung Association and Heritage Hospital. A lecture entitled, Fitness of the Ages will be offered at the Senior Center on Friday, April 23% Mike O'Malley, Director of Physical Medicine and a certified athletic trainer at Heritage Hospital will present this free lecture. Toplies to be covered include: getting the most out of life at all ages, exercise, coordination of how to stay fit and strong. Commodity Distribution - First Monday of the month from 1:30 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. USDA surplus food products are distributed to low income Rancho Cucamonga residents on a first come, first served basis. Next distribution date is: May 3% The Doctor is In - During the month of April, Dr~ Harvey Cohen provided a free informative program for the community on "Treatment tbr Osteo Arthritis: Degenerative Joint Disease". This program is part of the regular monthly afternoon presentations offered free of charge on the third Tuesday of the month at the Senior Center. During the upcoming month of May, (May 19'h) Dr. Cohen will be doing a special evening presentation on. "t lypertcnsion: What's New in the Treatment of High Blood Pressure". Elder I,aw Matters - Seminars on important senior issucs are prcscntcd monthly at the Senior Center by Gregory Wood, Attorney at Law and member of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys. The next free presentation will. be held on Friday, April 23 rd at 11:00 a.m. -thc topic being presented is "Why Should I have a Durable Power of Attorney?" CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 21, 1999 Page '7 Facilities: · The first annual Spruce Avenue Park Skate Demonstration and Safety Clinic was held on Saturday, March 27, 1999, from 1 I:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.. There were five hundred skaters, friends and family members enjoying skating demonstrations, contests, music and give-aways. The event was co-sponsored by Active Ride Shop, K-ROQ radio, Carl's Jr. and the Teen Recreation Activity Club. K-ROQ and Active Ride provided give-away items throughout the day, and K-ROQ provided the PA system and music, and Tie the Knot provided balloon decorations. Active Ride Shop put on tile safety clinic explaining the need ti>r safety gear and a demonstration ofsaf~r ways to skate and fall. · Heritage Park Equestrian Center -'['he Alta Loma Riding Club held a hunter/jumper show on March 14a' with approximately 100 in. att:endance. Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy hosted a schooling show on March 21" with approximately 150 in attendance. In April, the Alta Loma Riding Club scheduled a benefit play clay fbr Sunday, April 11~ - unfortunately due to rain the event was canceled: the 4-H Rancho Rebels will be hosting a horse show on the 17m, from 8-5 p.m.. In the month of May, Rising Stars of the Inland Community Chapter will hold a dressage show on Sunday, May 16'", from 8.-5 p.m.. During June, the Alta Loma Riding Club will hold another hunter/jumper show on Sunday, June 6~', flora 8-5 p.m.. The Grapevine: · The Summer issue of 'Tile Grapevine. which began production in March, and went to print in April, will be delivered to residents in mid-May. Over 50,000 copies of the 44-page magazine will be printed, with 48,000 being direct mailed to residents. Contract Classes: · The Spring session of contract classe~ begia in early April. Over two hundred (200) different class opportunities were offered to community members. Total enrollment for the Winter session was 1,970 registrants. Community Wide Special Events: · Art in the Park - The 9th annual Art in the Park will take place on Saturday, May 8'h, from 10-4 p.m. at Red Hill Community Park. Local crafters will have homemade art and craft items for sale. Community members will also have the opportunity to participate in varietyof"hands on" crafts. The Cucamonga District Host Lions Club will host a pancake breakfast from 7-11 a.m. for a minimal charge of $3.00. There will also be games for children, train rides, a petting zoo, pony rides, music and entertainment. This event is scheduled for the day before Mother's Day to provide last minute shoppers with the opportunity to purchase that special gift tbr 'More'. It is estimated that 6,000~7,000 community members will attend this community wide special event. · Cinco de Mayo - The Community Scow'ices Department and the Northtown Housing Development Corporation will be hosting its annual Cinco de Mayo Celebration on Sunday, May 2, 1999, at Old Town Park, from 10-4 p.rn~ The event will include live Mariachi, a D.J., Ballet Folklorico dance groups, an Aztec Indian clance group, children's rides, game booths, magic and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 21, 1999 Page 8 puppet shows, and face painting. Food booths will be provided by the Northtown Cucamonga Making the Difference Organization, and Betty Jean's Shaved Ice. Attendees will also receive a raffle ticket for door prize drawings that will take place throughout the afternoon. This special event is open to the entire community and is free of charge. A m using Children' s Theater - The Franklin ttaynes Marionettes and the Crazy Music Machine Puppet Show took place on Saturday, March 20~h at the Lions West Community Center. This family oriented show of puppets and music: entertained and amused an audience of approximately 60 people. ,4 Comedy/Magic Show starring Jay Leslie took place on Saturday, April 17~h at Lions West Comnmnity Center. This show featured a night of fun, magic and lots of fun for the entire family. Park and Recreation Commission: · The March 17'~ Park and Recreation Commission meeting was canceled due to a lack of quorum. Epicenter: · The following activities took place at the Rancho Cucan'~onga Epicenter during the reporting period: - Community Services Department - Children's Concert (April 3, 1999) - Calvary Chapel Chino Hills - Easter Sunrise Services (April 4, 1999) - California Association of School Transportation Officials - School Bus Roadco (April 16/17,1999) · Staff is working with the following representatives [br future events at the Epicenter: - tfillside Community Church - Soapbox Derby and Community Fair (May 30/31, 1999) - Daily Bulletin/Quakes/City - All Stars Baseball Game (June 7/8, 1999) - Promotec Marketing - Used Cm' Super 'Tent Sale (June 9-14, 1999) - Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation Ceremony (June 17, t999) Respectfully submitted, ~ick ~m~zc" '/~ ~ "(km'r~unity Development Director RG:KM:KME Community Services Director