Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 27,1978 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, December 27, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Rempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. * * ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy, Herman Rempel ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Laura Jones (Excused) ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Barry Hogan, Senior Plannez; Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Bill Hofman, Assistant Planner; and Nancy McAllister, Secretary ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon Motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Rempel and unanimously carried the Special Study Session minutes of November 21, 1978.were approved subject to the following change: Peter Tolstoy to be shown as; absent'at this meeting Jorge Garcia to be shown as present at this meeting , Upon Motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried, the Special Study Session Minutes of November 29, 1978 were approved subject to the following change: Page 2, the last sentence in the first paragraph to be changed as follows: Appointed to that committee were Commissioners Jones, Garcia and Rempel. Motion passed unanimously. ~ * ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03 - HONE - Request to allow a restaurant, related bar facilities and musical entertainment within a proposed neighborhood shopping center located on the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street in the C-1 zone. t Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He indicated a letter was received from the Mayor of the City of Upland which stated that the present Boars Head in the City of Upland has been operating for over four years. It is a well run business estab- lishment which hasn't caused any problems for the city. It stated it is an asset from the City's viewpoint. (Letter on file in the Planning Division). He reported Condition 114 in the Resolution regarding hours of operation should be completed by the Commission. Also, Condition 115 was left open for the Commission to consider the granting of the CUP for a period of time. He recommended that the Commission approve Resolution No. 78-40 subject to the findings and conditions as listed with the com- pletion of Conditions 114 and 115. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission for the staff. Commissioner Dahl asked if a CUP is subject`to revocation at any time if the con- ditions are not met. What would be the reason for placing a time limit on the CUP? Mr. Hogan stated yes, the reason for a time limit is to review the CUP at the end of a stated period of time. In the future, homes will be built in this area with new residents who may have complaints about the use and not know how to voice that complaint. This gives them as well as the Commission the opportunity to nip the problem in the bud rather than have it go on and become a major problem. He indi- cated a Conditional Use Permit can be reviewed at any time, but Staff felt better to put a period of time on it and that the applicant be made aware of this. There being no further questions from the Commission to the Staff, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing and asked for comments from the applicant. Mr. Doug Hone stated Mr. Downey who owns the Boars Head in Upland will be operating at this location. He stated if this business is allowed to develop and should there be any trouble in the future whereby the Police Department has to respond to calls, this use could be reviewed at that time. Mr. Downey is investing a lot of money in this business and does not want any trouble. This will be a very high quality business establishment that serves dinner and lunch and one which will be an asset to the community. Mr. Downey, applicant, stated he would be happy to answer questions from the Commis- sion. He stated the Boars Head will be approximately 2,700 square feet. It will be more plush then the present Boars Head in Upland. They will have a very limited dance floor. The music will begin at approximately 9 p.m. and play until 1:30 a.m. No noise will be heard outside of the building. The heaviest business will be between the hours of 9 p.m. and 1:30 a.m, at which time the rest of the shopping center will be closed. They will have a larger kitchen then the present Boars Head and will have a larger menu. Chairman Rempel asked Mr. Downey what the normal hours of operation are for this facility. Mr. Downey stated they would like to open at 11:00 a.m. and close by 2:00 a.m. Chairman Rempel stated it is his opinion that a time limit should be placed on the granting of the CUP because most of the surrounding residential area is not occupied yet. It should definitely be reviewed in a specified period of time to insure there is no problems rather than waiting until there are complaints. Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 27, 1978 C\ Commissioner Garcia stated he is concerned about the entertainment proposed. He felt the reason some of the facilities are successful such as Upland is due to the fact the community is well developed. He asked what is proposed in terms of security. Mr. Downey stated the best security he can think of is the way the business is operated. They will have a host that will stand at the door to check I.D. 's and on-site security for special events. Conm~issioner Garcia asked what is the maximum capacity requested for the facility. Mr. Downey stated the maximum capacity will be approximately 130. Doug Hone stated in talking with the Police Department for the City of Upland, they had nothing but praise for the Boars Head located in their city. Ted Hopson, City Attorney, stated the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board submits pros- pective applicants to the local police department and if they object to the business it is grounds for the ABC not to issue a license. Therefore, the Sheriff's Department will have input as to whether or not the license is granted. Chairman Rempel asked if there will be sufficient parking in this center with the Boars Head addition. Doug Hone stated they have exceeded the required parking on the site for the center. Commissioner Garcia asked Mr. Downey if he objects to Condition I15 in the Resolution in regard to placing a time limit on this CUP. Mr. Downey stated he feels that there is already a conditional situation on this permit. If there is any problem in the future, they would expect to be notified of this at the time the problem is noted. He does not feel placing a time limit on this use is really necessary. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a new operator should take over this business in the future, would he haveto apply for a use permit? Mr. Hogan stated no, this use permit runs with the land, not the owner. Mr. Hopson stated he. would feel more comfortable with the approval of this develop- ment if an additional condition were placed in the Resolution stating that the applicant shall agree in writing to all conditions within 60 days from approval. Commissioner Dahl suggested that Condition-lI5 in the Resolution be reworded as follows: The CUP is granted for a period of indefinite time with Planning Com- mission review after 24 months of operation at which time the Commission may add or delete conditions. Commissioner Garcia stated he is still a little concerned about the parking, and whether or not it is in compliance with the codes. City Attorney stated the ordinance reads that one parking space shall be required for every three seats within.a restaurant. Jack Lam stated the parking proposed would more than meet the standard of the ordi- nance as to the calculations in terms of square footage for eating establishments versus retail and office uses. Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 27, 1978 Chairman Rempel stated it is his opinion that Condition 114 in the Resolution should be worded as follows: Hours of operation shall not exceed 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. Chairman Rempel asked if any one else in the audience would like to speak for or against this CUP. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman, Rempel closed the public hearing. Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to approve Resolution No. 78-40 subject to the findings and conditions as listed with the following changes and additions: Cohdition 114: Hours of operation shall not exceed 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. Condition 115: The CUP is granted for a period of indefinite time with Planning Commission review after 24 months of operation at which time the Commission may add or delete conditions. Condition 117: The applicant shall agree in writing to all conditions within 60 days from approval. AYES: DAHL, TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: JONES MOTION CARRIED. ~ ~ OLD BUSINESS Utilization of Trailers for Sales Tract Offices (Planning Commission Interpretation Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. Staff requests that the Planning Com- mission determine whether their interpretation of Section 61.0219(A)5 will allow trailer coaches to be used for tract sales offices, and if so, that such usage will be allowed subject to the approval' of a location and development plan (Site Approval) as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Garcia stated during past years we have seen a tremendous amount of these in operation within the City. He is very concerned that in many tracts the trailer was put up prior to any type of development taking place. Some of the trailers remained for the total sales of the tract. It is his opinion that trailers should be used until model homes are completed and; conversion of the garage has been com- pleted. However, he doesn't feel that trailers should be installed and be used for business until the tract is complete. He feels tliep are a nuisance to the community and he is not receptive to that type of usage as it detracts from the aesthetics of the City. He would be receptive to a temporary usage of the trailer for business purposes until conversion of the garage is completed. Mr. Hopson stated there have been cases where a tract developer does not have model homes. What would be done in this case? Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 27, 1978 ~. Barry Hogan stated perhaps the Commission might want to consider Site Approval of temporary trailers in order to allow the Commission to review each location, parking requirements and landscaping to insure the proper requirements have been met. It is his opinion that a temporary trailer could be acceptable aesthetically if proper standards are set to insure the proper placement on the site, landscaping, set time limit on the tract operation of the office, provisions for parking, fencing, etc. Commissioner Garcia stated he agrees that .the utilization of trailers for sales offices should be reviewed under Site Approval. In addition, it would be advisable if the Staff would work up some guidelines and policies that the Commission can go by in its review. After further discussion, a Motion was made by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to accept Staff recommendation to allow trailer coaches to be used for interim tract sales offices subject to the approval of location and develop- ment plans under the Site Approval process. AYES: REMPEL, NOES: NONE ABSENT: JONES MOTION CARRIED. TOLSTOY, DAHL, GARCIA ~ ~ * * ~ COUNCIL REFERRAL Jack Lam summarized previous Commission actions which have been reviewed by the City Council. The Vanir Development on Amethyst and 19th Street (Director Review 1178-19) reviewed by the Planning Commission at its last meeting was referred to the City Council at its meeting of December 20. The Council after discussion adopted the Commission recommendation on the 50% limitation for C-1 uses and approved the uses which the Commission recommended. Regarding the issue of Growth Management, the Council continued the current moratorium for a period of 60 days, but exempted multi-family apartments and multi-family tracts. It is felt multi-family apartment developments will have a minimum impact on the school district. The reason the Council extended the moratorium was there was varying information being circulated in the community that made a lot of people upset. Furthermore, a petition was submitted by Alta Loma residents in regard to the school impact issue. The Council appointed a fact-finding committee to look into the information that the Commission had previously considered to reverify the data. This group would report back to the Council before the 60 day period is over. * ~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS Barry Hogan reviewed the Staff Report for the Commission. Staff recommends that after review, the Planning Commission adopt the Administrative Regulations either in whole, part, or modified. Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 27, 1978 After much discussion and changes to the draft regulations, it was the concensus of the Commission that the regulations be redrafted and brought back for review under Old Business at the next meeting of January 10, 1979. * ~ ~ ~ ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 9:25 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:32 p.m. * ~ ~ ~ ~ CONSIDERATION OF THE PRELIMINARY ALQUIST=PRIOLO SPECIAL STUDIES ZONES MAPS as per requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act of 1972. Bill Hofman, Planning Assistant, reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. The Planning Division recommends the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zones preliminary maps as modified be submitted for approval to the City Council and thence submitted to the State as per requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act of 1972. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission of the Staff. Commissioner Garcia asked if it would be proper to develop some guidelines prior to the recommendation to the Council in order to send the whole package rather than piecemeal. Bill Hofman stated the reason we did not do this is that we are trying to meet a deadline to get this information to the State. The State will be publishing offi- cial maps in the near future. It is to our advantage to get comments to the State as quickly as possible. Jack Lam stated the way to appraoch any proposed development in known earthquake fault areas is to require research through the environmental process within a quarter mile on either side of the fault, and not allow any habitable structure within 50' of a known fault. This will eventually be part of our Sesimic Safety Element; however, in the meantime the Geologic Committee is working on this issue in order to get as much information as possible. After general discussion, a Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to recommend the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones pre- liminary maps as modified be submitted for approval to the City Council and then submitted to the State as per requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act of 1972. AYES: GARCIA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: JONES MOTION CARRIED ~ is * is is Planning Commission Minutes -6- December 27, 1978 SERVICE STATION STANDARDS Barry Hogan; Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed standards and direct staff to agendize a zoning ordinance amendment to incorporate those standards in our Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he feels minor welding should be allowed within a service station. Mr. Hogan stated these standards were taken from a variety of ordinances that we have reviewed. We feel that this is a good start for discussion. The Commission may want to discuss this tonight and set a further meeting at a later date as the Commission desires. Commissioner Tolstoy stated it is his opinion that self serve gas stations and ser- vice stations should have a different set of standards. Mr. Hogan stated the Site Approval procedure requires public hearings before the Commission and basically a Site Approval the way the ordinance is written is a con- ditional use permit and can determine whether or not, because of circulation, self service or full service is acceptable. He stated if the Commission desires, a con- dition could be placed under special requirements that service stations if developed in a shopping center must be done in conjunction with the total development and not after the fact. Commissioner Dahl stated he feels a definition is needed to distinguish between a full service station, a self service station, or a self service station with another use. He does not feel the same rules would apply for all three. Barry Hogan stated a definition for each could very easily be put into the standards. If:•there is a station that has full service, and if they want to convert to a self service station, it would require review under Site Approval. He doesn't think we as Staff or Commission should say a gas company has to provide a full service station. Then we are dictating what their market should be based on Commission and Staff feelings. Commissioner Garcia stated he feels we should be able to formulate a document that will deal with all standards of the community which the citizen or developer should be able to obtain and be able to address himself to any type of development within the community. Jack Lam stated the intent was to develop a policy for the City. Policies are a collection of standards via resolutions. We can not develop all standards at once; however, as they are developed they will be assembled into a policy manual. Mr. Hogan stated there are certain uses that change as time changes. Self service wasn't anything some years back. With anew City, standards tend to be revised as we see some things that work one way, can be changed to better work another way. The Resolution can be revised as necessary. Chairman Rempel stated he would like to add that where possible pictures are worth a thousand words. Pictures that can show the requirements rather than using a lot of words is more valuable. Planning Commission Minutes -7- December 27, 1978 Commissioner Dahl stated he is in favor of standards for automobile service stations; however, he would like to see anything regarding self service stations or mixed use stations removed. It is his opinion that these should be a separate set of standards set up for each of the different uses. Chairman Rempel stated perhaps one policy could be adopted with a separate section for full service, a separate section for self service, and a separate section within the policy for mixed use stations. Mr. Lam stated these separate sections can be developed. Commissioner Garcia stated it is customary now to have a gas station with a car wash next to it. Some type of standards should also 6e developed to handle this type of situation. Also, he is concerned about the repair of automobiles and whether they should be allowed in the front of the building, or in the back. It is his opinion that repairs should be limited to the rear of the station. Mr. Hopson stated as he understands it, it is the concensus of the Commission that service stations can only be approved under Site Approval. The way the County ordi- nance is presently written a service station in the C-1 or C-2 zone is allowed with- out Site Approval. As long as the use is consistent with the zone, there is no con- trol of the use. The only way the Commission can have control is under the Site Approval procedure. After further discuss ion, .it was the concensus of the Commission that the Service Station Standards be redrafted to include the points mentioned above. ~~~,t~ SPECIAL BOULEVARD STANDARDS Jack Lam reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. The Planning Division recommends that the Commission consider such policies and instruct staff to prepare a necessary resolution for future adoption. Commissioner Garcia stated regarding Foothill Blvd. and other special boulevard areas, he would like to discourage parking in front of the buildings. He:.would like to see this implemented because he feels that it gives a better image. Chairman Ranpel stated he feels there would be problems with totally eliminating parking in the front. If done right, parking can be located in the front of a development that doesn't detract from the aesthetics of the development. Commissioner Garcia stated we should encourage diversity of exterior structural design and site development plans over and beyond increasing landscaping. Commissioner Tolstoy stated both Commissioners Garcia and Rempel have brought out good points. He feels what we are striving for is a variety in the develop- ments along major thoroughfares. Planning Commission Minutes -8- Dec ®ber 27, 1978 Mr. Lam stated what other cities have done in their standard policy whenever possible is to encourage designers to design a facility so that parking is not facing the street. At the design review stage when plans are discussed this can be encouraged. Ih the industrial areas, most of the parking is located to the rear of the buildings. Barry Hogan stated it is a policy to provide a variety on special boulevards in order to provide for diversity and aesthetic appeal along the street. He suggested that the Commission set this item to come back to the meeting of January 24, 1979 to discuss this matter further. Mr. Lam stated that he will request the Chamber of Commerce to review these standards prior to the meeting of the 24th. A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to set this item for review under Old Business for the meeting of January 24, 1979. AYES: DAHL, NOES: NONE ABSENT: JONES MOTION CARRIID. TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL ~ * ~ ~ ~ CLARIFICATION OF MIXID USE CATEGORY AND STANDARDS FOR IMPLEMENTATION Barry Hogan reviewed the Staff Report in detail this being on file in the Plan- ning Division. It is recommended that the Commission concur with the procedure of allowing ancillary commercial uses subject to Site Approval in mixed use areas. Additionally, R-3 zoning in the mixed use area would be for multiple units only. In order to resolve the conflicts existing in the A-P and R-3 zones, Staff would also suggest that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a zoning ordi- nance amendment to solidify the examples listed above. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he thought this would be written into the new zoning ordinance. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, stated that is correct; however, we also need guidelines to follow at this time prior to the adoption of the new zoning ordinance. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to allow ancillary commercial uses subject to Site Approval in the mixed use areas. Additionally, R-3 zoning in the mixed use area would be for multiple units only and A-P for office and ancillary retail commercial uses. It was further recommended that the Staff prepare a zoning ordinance amendment for the A-P and R-3 zones. AYES: GARCIA, NOES: NONE ABSINT: JONES MOTION CARRIID DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL ~ * * ~ ~ Planning Commission Minutes -9- December 27, 1978 REQUEST BY RICHARD DEWITT for waiver of plan review for a temporary business location. Jack Lam reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He recommended since there are no ordinance provisions to allow the Planning Commission to waive the review procedures for the location and develop- ment of a temporary wholesale lumber business, staff recommends that the Commis- sion direct the applicant to file formal applications, fees, and plans for the Commission's review, if the applicant chooses to pursue this matter. Mr. Hopson stated under the code it is clear that interim business locations require location and development plan review. He stated there is no legal alter- native but to require this review. Mr. Steve Perryman, representing the applicant, stated their proposal was to open business and get their business license on the temporary site for approxi- mately 2 months. They are requesting that they be allowed to temporarily locate their lumber business on a different site than that previously approved by the Commission while the permanent site is being developed. They would be willing to sign a letter that they will be at this temporary location for no more than 2 months. Mr. Lam stated as Mr. Hopson indicated, there is no legal alternative but to require site plan review for a temporary business and that formal applications, fees and plans would have to be submitted for Commission review if the applicant chooses to pursue this matter. Therefore, no action can be taken on this item. It was the concensus of the Commission to direct the applicant to file formal applications, fees 'and plans for the Commission's review if the applicant chooses to pursue this matter and receive and file his request. ~ * * ~ ~ NON=AGENDA'ZTEMS Jack Lam stated at the last meeting the Commission was given a copy of a letter that responded to a couple of minor subdivisions out of the city. Staff was not given any maps or information whatsoever concerning these projects. The applicant wanted an opportunity to appear before the Commission to review these projects. The applicant was present earlier this evening but is not present at this time. He has submitted a map which does not give enough information for review. Chairman Rempel stated he would like to make it very clear to the County that when items are before tfiem for review within our zone of influence that they come to the City for review prior to County review. It was the concensus of the Commission that if the applicant desires, these minor subdivisions can be placed on the Agenda for review. However, it was felt that prior to any Commission review, more detailed information be submitted in order for the Commission to understand what is being requested. * ~ * ~ ~ Planning Commission Minutes -10- December 27, 1978 ADJOURNMENT Upon Motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unani- mously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of December 27, 1978. Meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Re1spectfully bmitted, l ~~ JACK LAM, Director of Community Development Planning Commission Minutes -11- December 27, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 1978 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cuca- monga, on Wednesday, December 13, 1978. Meeting was called•to order at 7:06 p.m. by Chairman Rempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. * ~ * ~ ~ ROLL CALL Present: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Herman Rempel, and Peter Tolstoy Absent: NONE Also Present: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Barry Hogan, Senior Planner; Michael Vairin, Associate Planner; Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Bill Hoffman, Assistant Planner; and Clara Murillo, acting secretary. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried, the Planning Commission minutes of November 8, 1978, were approved as submitted. Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried, the Planning Commission minutes of November 22, 1978 were_approved• subject to the following correction; Page 6, 5th line in first paragraph should read 9th St., rather than 19th St. The minutes of the Special meetings of November 21, and November 29, 1978, were held over to the Planning Commission meeting of 'December 27, 1978•. to allow Commissioners the opportunity to review them. Upon Motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl ,, it„was moved to limit discussion to 11:00 p.m. and continue any remaining items, to the December 27, 1978 meeting. .Motion was unanimously carried. ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements by Staff or Commission. ~~- ~ ~ ! ~, CONSENT CALENDAR Upon MOTION by Conanissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Garcia, it was moved to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted; A. Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 4875 B. Negative Declaration for Director R-view No. 78-31. Motion was carried unanimously. ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING .T REPORT FOR T LAND USE, CIRCU GENERAL PLAN. Jack Lam, Community Development Director, made the Staff presentation of this item. He indicated that this was a continuation of the November 22, 1978 meeting regarding the EIR. The item is back before the Commission tonight to reflect the changes prompted by comments that were made at that time. All the written correspondence to date has been included in the draft report. Revisions to the site plan map have also been made. Mr. Lam read the Resolution in its entirety. Commissioner Garcia questioned Staff in regard to the fault zones. Mr~. Lam explained that the fault zones are delineated on the Plan Map as set forth in the Alquist-Priolo study zones. Chairman Rempel opened the Public Hearing: Mr. Nate Rosenberg, representing Inland Counties Legal Services, indicated that his clientel are the low and middle income people within the community. Since the EIR is still in draft form, he hopes to influence Staff to also consider the housing element at this time. It is his feeling that the General Plan shows only fourteen sites, of these, two will probably go. to dormitory housing, two are already developed, leaving just ten to meet the demand. He further indicated that the City cannot,..by:law, just allow for single. family housing. The City could set aside locations for cluster type housing. Another option is to re- quire that each tract include a certain portion-of low income housing or that each builder set aside a certain percentage of his building. If low income housing is excluded it will increase commuter traffic and aggravate air quality problems. Commissioner Tolstoy wanted to know if the.agency,that he, represented included mobile homes in their totals. Mr. Rosenberg indicated that they did. It was moved by Commissioner Dahl to close the public hearing segment of the draft EIR, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried. At the request of Commissioner Garcia, Mr. Lam responded to the points raised by Mr. Rosenberg. Mr. Lam indicated that this is a post proposition 13 community with a limited budget to develop all of its elements at one time. Secondly, most other communities had a headstart since they were established before all the current General Plan elements were required. Further, he stated that Rancho Cucamonga does not enjoy that comfort and today there are even more elements that cities must con- Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 13, 1978 Sider. The elements of Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities are those the City wanted to deal with first, this was partly the reason the City incor- porated. He also indicated that there exist more than 14 locations for higher density housing since all the mixed use designations allow for multiple residen- tial, as well as, the medium density housing zones. Socio-economic information necessary to determine the housing needs is not available, and will not be until the City completes its special census in the Spring. Commissioners Garcia and Rempel addressed their feelings_,on the draft EIR and commented on the amount of time and effort that had gone into its preparation. Mr. Lam read the Resolution in its entirety. MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy to adopt Resolution No. 78-38 and forward the draft EIR to the City Council with its recommendations and findings for approval. Seconded by Commissioner Dahl; unanimously carried. MOTION by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Jones to consider Item 7G at this time; unanimously carried. * ~ ~ ~ ~ LAND USE CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENTS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Mr. Lam gave the report. Commissioner Garcia indicated that he would like to see the area in item ll3 kept as residential rather than mixed zoning. Chairman Rempel also concurred with this recommendation. Commissioner Dahl indicated that rather than eliminate some of our medium density we should be encouraging and preserving what does exist. MOTION by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to modify the Land Use Plan as follows: 1. To relocate the neighborhood shopping center symbol on the northwest corner of Highland and Haven slightly northerly away from the Garden Apartment site. 2. Modify the east side of Archibald between 19th and the Railroad tracks to medium density. 3. To modify the southwest and southeast co=ners of Hermosa and Baseline to low density. and to adopt Resolution No. 78-33 as submitted with its findings and recommenda- tions to the City Council to adopt the Interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan. Motion unanimously carried. MOTION by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Garcia to discuss Item H at this time. Motion carried unanimously. Prior to discussion, a recess 'was requested. * ~ ~ * ~ Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 13, 1978 RECESS Recess called at 8:20 p.m., meeting resumed at 8:30 p.m. with all Commissioners present. * ~ ~ * ~ RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING GROWTH MANAGEMENT Mr. Lam gave the Staff presentation indicating that the Staff had adjusted the BIA recommendation. The impact of these projects on the school districts would not be felt until one year after building permit issuance at the earliest. Furthermore, such impact would be in phases rather than at once. However, the Alta Loma School District desires to see the moratorium continued. Mr. Lam read the title and the entire Resolution for the Commission and the audience. The unapproved tentative tract maps on .file would have two choices: 1) to re- submit with proportional credit for fees already paid,or 2) be denied without prejudice. Mr. Lam indicated that he felt it would be in the developer's best interests to resubmit because it will make the process much easier and faster. Commissioner Garcia then gave a detailed account of the Committee. He indicated that of the approved units approximately 550 would be in the Alta Loma School District. The remaining would be in the Central School District. Comments from the public were taken. Mr. McMurtry, Alta Loma School District Superintendent,, indicated that a continua- tion of the building moratorium would allow his school district to eliminate double session. With the opening of the Stork School,_double sessions could end but that with the available 1760 homes now under construction there will be an influx of new students. The remaining bonding capacity the school district has would allow them to build a school to house these additional students; how- ever; it takes t.hree._years to build a school. He stated that there are no other available funds to house those students that would result from any further building ~f the moratorium were lifted. He further indicated that pressure must be put on the legislature to find some other means of building schools in the future once the current funding program runs out: A spokesman for R.J. Investment Company indicated that their company is awaiting a 20 lot subdivision -- that any further delay would just create a log jam in July and accomplish little. Mr. Lam indicated that if the proposal is adopted by the City Council, Staff will immediately notify all those concerned. Charles Doskow, Lewis Homes, indicated that they felt there should be some kind of consideration for those projects that had previously submitted to the County. Bob Frost, President of the Alta Loma School District, also requested that the moratorium be continued. Nancy Kettle, a member of the Alta Loma School Board, requested that the mora- torium be continued. She said that trying to be fair to the builders would be unfair to the youngsters who have to go to school. . Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 13, 1978 MOTION by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Garcia adopting Resolu- tion 78-39 and recommend acceptance of the growth management list as submitted by Staff. Chairman Rempel requested that an amendment be added to. Section 3 of the Resolution to read, "All existing residential parcel maps currently on file with the City may be processed after January 1, 1979, and building permits be allowed to be issued and another amendment to ask our state legislators to support new school financing. Amendment was seconded by Commissioner Garcia. Motion carried unanimously. ~ ~ ~ ZONE CHANGE N0. 78-OS - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN CHURCH The Staff Report was presented by Barry Hogan, Senior Planner. Commissioner Tolstoy questioned the location of Banyan Avenue at ultimate development. He suggested that the street be curved. Doug Hone, representing Southern California Lutheran Church, indicated that the church desires to locate a small chaperon that portion of the property and lease some parking from the Flood Control District because there is an eighty-eight foot corrider for a water pipe located north and adjacent to the property line of the site that will sit dormant. This leaves the entire bottom site for a larger chapel and school at some point in the future. MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, to adopt Negative Declaration for Zone Change No. 78-OS and Resolution No. 78-34. Motion unanimously carried. * * ~ * ~ ZONE CHANGE N0. 78-06 - HONE/GORGEN Mr. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Tolstoy expressed concern about the improvements that would be required on Hellman and Baseline Avenues. Staff indicated that this development would be contributing its share for the_improvements. Mr. Doug Hone indicated that all the improvements would be made on the two streets once all the details have been worked out. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about the piece on the corner. Staff indicated that the piece was an unbuildable lot and that condemnation proceedings by the City had already begun to enable-the City to make the necessary improvements on the corner. MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Dahl, to adopt Negative Declaration for Zone Change No. 78-06 and to adopt Resolution No. 78-35. Motion unanimously carried. * ~ ~ ~ Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 13, 1978 VARIANCE N0. 78-02 - BROADHEAD The Staff Report was presented by Barry Hogan n u Jean Broadhead, applicant, indicated that the topography was unique in that the Flood Control Distribt abuts her rear property line and the setback would not be infringing on anyone. Ron Smith, friend of the applicant, requested that Staff explain what the necessity is for rear yard setback requirements. Mr. Lam indicated it was for many things, among them fire access, light, air and aesthetics. MOTION by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to adopt Resolution No. 78-36 denying Variance No. 78-36. Motion was unanimously carried. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-12 - ALDERFER RANCH PARTNERSHIP Mr. Lam indicated that the applicant has requested a continuance to the January 10, 1979 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Jones to continue Director Review No. 78-12 to January 10, 1979. Motion carried unanimously. * ~ * ~ ~ DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-53 - THOMPSON Michael Vairin gave the staff report. Commissioner Garcia questioned the location of parking and the lack of land- scaping on the east property line. Mr. Vairin indicated that the landscaping in the front of the building will take.care of the situation. MOTION by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt Resolu- tion No. 78-37 and direct staff to pay particular attention to the landscaping design. Motion carried unanimously. ~ * * * ~ COUNCIL REFERRAL MOTION by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Garcia to consider the following item beyond the 11:00 p.m. time. Motion carried unanimously. LIMITATION OF USES ON THE VANIR SITE Mr. Lam made the staff presentation and indicated this is an item that the Commission had considered on a previous occasion. The City Council is asking for a recommendation on the list of uses proposed for the site. Planning Commmission Minutes -6- December 13, 1978 Mr. Gentry, representing Vanir Development, indicated that they wanted clari- fication on the percentage of A-P requesting that the A-P be limited to 30%. Commission indicated that a minimum of 50% be A-P and retail-commercial could occupy the remainder. Each Commissioner then listed those items on the proposed use list he would like removed. The general concensus was that items 1, 3, 6 and 15 should be eliminated. The applicant wishes to exchange item 14 for item 15. Clark Bowen, neighbor across the street from this project, indicated that he thought the buildings were to have been in line with something like the post office. MOTION by Chairman Rempel, seconded by_Commissioner Dahl to limit the retail- commercial to a maximum of 50% of the building and eliminate items 1, 3, 6 and 15 from the proposed list of uses. Motion carried unanimously. Applicants requested that they be allowed to appeal this decision to the City Council with respect to substituting item 14 for item 15. .City Attorney indi- cated that this was,-only a Planning Commission recommendation to the City Coun- cil. They still have the opportunity to speak before the City Council. ~ ~ * * ~ ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Chairman Rempel to adjourn the meeting to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of December 27, 1978. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 12:00 a.m. Respectfully ubmitted, --J Wes""' JACK LAM, Director of Community Development Planning Commission Minutes -7- December 13, 1978 ~~ _~ ' ~~ f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 29, 1978 CALL TO ORDER The study session of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Central School District Board Room. The session was called to order. ~ * ~ ~ ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Herman Rempel, and Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Lloyd Hubbs, Michael Vairin, Ted Hopson, Barry Hogan, Bill Hofman and Harry Empey. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The Director displayed the approved tentative list indicating the number of sewered dwelling units approved and the number of non-sewered dwelling units approved, indicating that this establishes the scale to work with. The tentatives not approved (approximately 2;700)-were displayed also. .It was noted that many of these may drop out hence reducing the unapproved tentatives significantly. It was stressed that this list is 'tentative and have not been reviewed or approved by any agency. The Director reviewed the growth management strategy and its constraints explaining that there are three phases: 1) Phase development and create procedures for establishing development for approved tentatives; 2) continue the B.I.A. agreement for non-sewered tentatives and begin allocation of the approved tentatives through a growth management strategy; "3) development and implementation of the growth management plan and begin processing those tentatives submitted but not approved. The Director displayed the work pro- gram and indicated the time involved for the implementation of. the growth management plan from its inception to City Council adoption on July, 1979. Time Constraints or Development was reviewed. The Director indicated a 14 month lag period from time of issuance of permits to occupancy of the dwelling units. After considerable discussion a motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and se- conded by Commissioner Garcia to 1) schedule some phasing of the approved "..~ ~... ~' tentatives and 2) work with the B.I.A., Lewis development, Trinity development and two members of the Planning Commission on ways-of solving the problem of a school site for the Alta Loma School District. Appointed to that committee were Commissioners Jones , Garcia and"Rempel. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:15 to the December 13 Planning Commission meeting. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JL:BKH:em . ~ ~Ct ~~ . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1978 Regular Meeting -CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cuca- monga on Wednesday, November 22, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Rempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. * ~ ~ ~ ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Herman Rempel Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: NONE ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Barry Hogan, Senior Planner; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, Bill Hofman, Assistant Planner; and Nancy McAllister, Secretary ~ ~ * ~ APPROVAL 'OF MINUTES Upon Motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, the Planning Commission minutes of September 27, 1978 were approved subject to the following change: Page 5, 2nd item under General Plan discussion, Mr. Catan- zaro's name has been misspelled and should be corrected accordingly. Upon Motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, the Planning Commission minutes of October 25, 1978 were approved as sub- mitted. ~ * ~ ~ ~ STAFF COMM[JNICATIONS Jack Lam stated Lloyd Hubbs the City Engineer will introduce one of the staff members in the Engineering Division. Lloyd Hubbs introduced Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer, who came to us from Calrrans. He indicated ho has spent considerable time in the Traffic Department. Page 1 of 15 .~ ~~ - STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam gave copies of the proposed sign ordinance to the Commission members. He indicated these copies area revision of the previous draft. The Chamber of Commerce has made certain suggestions for modification to the ordinance which have been incorporated into the draft. This is not a final draft, the Commission can review and make comments. Perhaps at the next regular scheduled meeting, the Commission can set a date fora study session on this ordinance. * * ~ ~ ~ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam reported a memo was included in the Planning Commission packets concerning negative declarations. He indicated at the present time negative declarations are being submitted to the Commission on development projects considered by the Commis- sion or by staff at a Director Review level. In the future, the Commmission will receive the final study that is developed by the applicant for the individual projects accompanied by a one page short analysis of the particular project. We will not sub- mit the check list. Whenever an item is checked off that staff feels is significant, those will be pinpointed in the one page report to the Commission. These negative declarations will be on the consent calendar and should the Commission have any questions with a particular negative declaration, it can be pulled off and discussed further. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a site map will be included with the one page report. Jack Lam stated yes it will include a site map. Commissioner Garcia stated he would like the form completed by the applicant to be typed or in a more readable form. Also, item 3 of the report which deals with the letter submitted by the utility services, perhaps a little more explanation could be given on this item rather than just a yes or no answer. ~ * ~ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Garcia stated information was received regarding capital improvement programs. He asked if this is for their information or discussion? Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated this is the initial input received on the capital improvements program. He had a meeting with the new advisory commission approximately two weeks ago at which time this document was presented to them. The information is being reviewed by them at this time and will be brought back to the next meeting to sort out priorities and ideas. If the Commission has anything to add, we would appreciate hearing from anyone. At this time, the document includes public works capital improvements-only. A full capital improvement program which will include parks and other elements should be completed about the first of the year. December 14 will be the next Advisory Council meeting. If the Commission has anything to add he would appreciate receiving this information prior to that date. ~ * ~ ~ ~ Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 22, 1978 r e L' • • Chairman Rempel stated he would like to review the Consent Calendar items at this time. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Garcia stated he has some questions regarding Item H on the Consent Calendar - Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 4749, and asked that it be Xeinoved at this time. There being no discussion on Item G of the Consent Calendar - Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 4767 - a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to approve the Negative Declaration. ,t ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE N0. 78-03 - WALT SIEGL - Request to change the zone from R-1 to A-P for property located on the northeast corner of Hermosa and 19th Street. Bill Hofman, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail. He reported this zone change is consistent with the proposed General Plan and the site is suitable in size and shape to accommodate the uses permitted in the zone requested. The use of this land as a professional office complex would be compatible to the existing and future land uses on adjacent properties. He reported a notice of public hearing was published in the Cucamonga Times and one letter in opposition to the zone change was recieved from Mrs. Laura Hawker. Copies of this letter have been distributed to the Commission. The Planning Division recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-32 recommending approval of the zone change from R-1 to A-P and forward it to the City Council. At this time, Chairman Rempel and Commissioner Garcia stated they have ,employment with Harnish, Morgan and Causey and will abstain from participating on this item. Commissioner Tolstoy was appointed as Acting Chairman for this review. Acting Chairman Tolstoy opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Gillim, Architect with Harnish, Morgan and Causey, stated he has brought a rendering of the proposed project. He understands this will be reviewed under site approval however, he brought the plan along at this time for informational purposes. He stated the zoning is compatible with the proposed master plan. He feels the project they are proposing will be an asset to the community and provide needed medical office space. Commissioner Jones asked if it will be necessary to widen the street in that particular area. Lloyd Hubbs stated that street widening to ultimate width would be a condition of approval at the time of Director Review. However, further review of the drainage problems may require alternatives other than full improvement. Mr. Gillim stated he will be very happy to work with staff to solve any problems. Planning Commission Minutes _3_ November 22, 1978 <~ ..- Jack Meary, who lives on 19th Street halfway between Hermosa and Haven, stated he is in favor of the zone change. Mr. Walt Siegel, applicant, stated they believe that the project that is 'planned for this location would be a definite asset for~the.community. Mr. Glenn Foster, property owner to the north of this zone change, stated he owns 7 1/2 acres on the north boundary of the site and they have a horse ranch there now. He stated they plan to continue this horse ranch, and possibly expand in the future. Their previous inquiries with the County prior to the City incorporating indicated that it would be possible for them to get a condi- tional use permit in order to moderately expand their horse ranch. He stated he would like to ask Mr. Siegl if he feels the horse ranch would be in conflict with his proposal? He has talked to several people in the area and there has been no strong feelings expressed one way or the other. Mr. Siegl stated they are proposing to develop medical office buildings and possibly a small clinic. He stated if the use of the adjacent property does not cause any air pollution -and does not violate city ordinances or standards, he has no objections. Mr. Art Bridge stated he is not concerned about this project; however, he would like to know why Mrs. Laura Hawker objects to this development. Her objections should be known by the audience. The Director read Mrs. Hawker's letter for the audience (letter on file in the Planning Office). After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt Resolution No. 78-32 based on the findings as listed. It was further recommended that this recommendation be forwarded to the City Council. AYES: DAHL, JONES, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: GARCIA, REMPEL ABSENT: NONE MOTION CARRIED ~ * ~ At this time, Chairman Rempel asked that the Old Business items be reviewed. OLD BUSINESS Access Policy for Major and Secondary Highways - Initiated by Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, reviewed the staff report in detail. He reported the access policy has been revised to reflect the various concerns of all interested people. The major change reduced the recommended frontage control from 600 foot of frontage to 300 feet recognizing that the intent is to obtain a 300 foot spacing of driveways. Further changes authorize the Community Development Director to issue deviations to the policy with appeals to the Planning Commission Minutes -q_ November 22, 1978 -~ << Commission. It is Staffs' opinion that:the access policy as now written is supported by all concerned parties in the community. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-29 as submitted. After general discussion, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Jeff Sceranka, stated he is not speaking on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee but as a member of::the Committee. It was felt this policy should be subject to common sense and good planning policies. It is his opinion in reviewing the Resolution, it is based on good coordination and good development procedures. Developers and the City can work together to come up with the best possible alternatives. He feels if an access policy is not made reasonable in terms of access, the City will run into all kinds of unnecessary problems. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A Motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Garcia to approve Resolution No. 78-29 as submitted. AYES: TOLSTOY, GARCIA, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MOTION CARRIID * ~ ~ ~ Request for Revisions to Tract No. 9589 - Request submitted by Mr. Bates Jack Lam stated this item was continued from the November 8 meeting because of a particular issue. This issue could not be resolved in the intervening two weeks; therefore, the applicant is requesting withdrawal on his request at this time. When he is ready to resubmit, he may 3o so at that time. Withdrawal accepted by Planning Commission. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OLD BUSINESS Director Review No. 78-32 - GSR Development - Request fo'r approval of a multi- tenant industrial complex located at the southwest corner of Helms and Ninth Streets in the M-R (Restricted Manufacturing) zone. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report in detail. He reported the Commission at its meeting of October 11, 1978 continued Director Review No. 78-32 to allow the applicant the opportunity to redesign his plans to accommodate the Commission's concerns relative to parking and building design along Ninth Street. The Commission was concerned that the ratio of 2.5 parking spaces per unit was insufficient for a "spec building" and the applicants proposed building elevations depicted loading doors facing Ninth Street, a heavily traveled road- way. Revised plans have been received creating a new building and a reduction in Building ~I1. Square footage reduction has increased the parking ratio from Planning Commission Minutes -5 November 22, 1978 ~' 2.5 spaces/leasable unit to 3.5 spaces/leasable unit. No loading doors will face Ninth Street. Staff recommends that the Commission approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-15 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. He reported Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, might wish to speak regarding the drainage situation. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated the Engineering Division would like to add one additional condition to the Resolution. The condition is to read as follows: "The applicant shall participate in the cost of any drainage improvements necessary to handle run off to the satisfaction of the City Engineer." He reported all drainage from ,.9th Street is blocked by the railroad tracks. This developer will not be required to provide all the facilities, but just a proportionate share of his run off. The area of runoff is very large compared to this one parcel. Several properties to the east will also contribute to the runoff. Currently, the only way of alleviating the drainage problem is westerly along the railroad tracks and bumping onto Hellman. All the parcels of land that abut the railroad will be required, as they develop, to participate in the cost of drainage improvements,. Applicant stated he is in agreement with the added condition. There being no further discussion, a Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to adopt Resolution No. 78-15 subject to the findings and conditions as listed in the Resolution with the City Engineer's additional condition. AYES: GARCIA, DAHL, JONES, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MOTION CARRIED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS Appeal of Minor Subdivision No. 77-0698I -Rancho Cucamonga Development Company - Appeal of a Community Development Department decision to deny a minor subdivision to create thirteen industrial lots on property generally located on the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and San Bernardino Road (4th Street). Bill Hofman, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail. He reported this application was originally submitted to the County of San Bernardino and later transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga after incorporation. The application was denied by the Community Development Director as the subdivision was in con- flict with the Flood Control District's proposed easement through this property. Staff feels this application should not be left open to be reprocessed at a future date. Instead a new application should be submitted to the City at the time the drainage easement is acquired. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-31 denying the appeal of Minor Subdivision No. 77-0698I based on the findings contained therein. Commissioner Garcia asked how concrete the plans are in order to acquire the easement. Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 22, 1978 Bill Hofman stated the flood control district has been in contact with the applicant who has agreed to work with the Flood Control District on acquiring the easement. Jack Lam stated the issue is whether or not the application should be left open. At this time, Staff feels enough applications are in limbo and that if there are revisions of a map that will require further analysis,, a new application should be filed. If we enable this individual to keep an open review we must then conceivably allow others to have an open application. Chairman Rempel stated it is obvious if the channel goes through the proposed subdivision it will have to be redesigned. He would agree with Staff that we should not leave this application open. Applicant, stated he doesn't feel it is fair to pay two fees on one application. The fees were originally paid through the County. They asked that this minor subdivision be tabled until the problems are resolved with the flood control district. Chairman Rempel stated at the same time it would not be fair for the City to review a complete new plan at a later time if a fee is not paid as it will require much time and expense of the City to review the plans. After general discussion, a Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt Resolution No. 78-3i denying the appeal. AYES: GARCIA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MOTION CARRIED JONES, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL * ~ ~ ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 8:10 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. ~ ~ * ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements and Map of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan including the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Jack Lam stated the State has required general plans for a number of years and over the last 10 or 15 years the State has added more and more features to the general plans of communities. Elements such as open space,<and conservation have been added. As there has been interest in the aesthetic features of certain travelways, they have added the scenic highways element, in addition to a seismic safety element. Concerns about noise pollution^and increasing levels of noise in the community created the need for a noise element. A housing element was added dealing with policies concerning housing programs. There is also the land use element, which people correlate directly to a general plan. As a new community, State law allows 30 months from the date of incorporation to complete each one Planning Commission Minutes -7- November 22, 1978 of the general plan elements. The traditional method of preparing general plan elements has been on an element by element basis. The fault of taking this approach is that it is very difficult to separate individual elements because of their interrelativeness. At the time of incorporation, the City had only enough financial resources to develop a certain portion of the general plan. The decision was made to focus upon the land use,'circulation and public facilities elements of the General Plan. It was felt that the policies of development contained in the County General Plan and County Zoning Ordinance were not accep- table as policies for our City; therefore, in order to achieve a new zoning ordinance, which must be consistent with the land use plan, it was decided that these three elements be prepared at this time. The policy of the Plan is to encourage the retention of agricultural zones as long as possible and not to upzone properties without specific development proposals for review, unless the Commission feels that certain types of growth should be encouraged in an area. The basic concept is to retain the lowest zone for any area until a specific project is eminent. This city embarked on the task of element preparation at the beginning of April of this year. Since that time the Commission has conducted a number of public workshops and numerous public hearings.to consider input from the community as well as to solicit comments as much as possible from individual property owners about specific properties. The DEIR is a informational document that addresses issues in relation to future development of the City. He reported we have received comments from the Department of Housing and Community Develop- ment, Air Quality Management District, Muriel Zimmerman, Inland Counties Legal Services, Rodney Parcel and Joe DiIorio, concerning the draft EIR.(These comments are on file in the Planning Division). Also, two days ago, Staff received a letter from the State of California Clearing House in regard to the draft Environ- mental Impact Report. Staff feels this city should consider all comments made and it is felt some of, the comments from the State are very critical. He indicated he has been in contact with the office of Planning and Research to ask them about their commnents in regard to the draft EIR,and the nature of their comments. There seems to be lack of knowledge at the state that this is a newly incorporated city and that there is a 3C month time frame allowed for the city to adopt their other elements. They have made a number of good comments which he felt the City should respond to. The Office of Planning and Research will be coordinating a meeting between the other agencies and our staff to find out more about our city and look at our program. Staff feels that after that meeting, the State will have a better picture of what we are trying to accomplish. He recommended that the Commission, after public hearing, continue this public hearing to the next Com- mission meeting at which time Staff would have adequate time to speak to each one of the State agencies to clarify the points of confusion and incorporate the comments which should be contained within the draft environmental impact report. Commissioner Garcia stated he is concerned that we have not received any communi- cation from major public facilities such as fire and police regarding the Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element. Jack Lam stated comments were requested from each of the public facilities and we have not received any response. Staff can only assume they have no comments at this time. After general discussion, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing on the Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element. Planning Commission Minutes -8- November 22, 1978 Mr. Al Blesant, living in the area basically from Hellman to Archibald, near 6th Street, stated land use in':this area is residential. Immediately to the south, north and within one half mile to the east, is industrial property. He would like to know if there could be a better land use then residential for this particular area. Jack Lam stated at this time, the Commission has provided many opportunities for individual concerns from property owners. This is an open public hearing this evening and the Commission can decide how it wants to handle each individual item. In this particular case, the Commission has discussed residential in this area. There is some residential in this area now, so there is a problem of iso- lation. The City of Ontario in this area is residential. He stated if an indi- vidual has concerns about an individual item, a written communication should be addressed to tfi e City Council so that they will know of these concerns and take that into consideration when they conduct their public hearing. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he thought the Commission has cut off the individual items at this time. Jack Lam stated the Commission voted to not agendize individual items; however, individuals could come up and state their concerns. The concerns can merely be stated for the record as the minutes are forwarded to the City Council. Art Bridge, stated he would like to speak specifically to an area shown for a school site on his property. His objection is that, in effect, the designation is some sort of condemnation having this area indicated for a school site. It will make it difficult when the time comes to use his property for other purposes then a school site. He would like to request that this symbol be taken off at this time and if a school site is required on this property in the future, he would be willing to cooperate at that time. Zn the meantime, he feels it is a disadvantage to show his property in this manner (property located south of Banyan, between Carnelian and Beryl). Chairman Rempel stated the school site symbols do not mean a school will definitely be constructed on that piece of property. It means that somewhere in this vicinity would be a logical area for a school, but will not necessarily be site specific. Jack Lam stated that the location of the symbols means that somewhere in the area there may be a need for a certain type of school, public facility or park. How- ever, the symbol does not necessarily mean that it is on that exact piece of pro- perty. There is no zoning that~~.would be applied to this land as a school. It is merely a conceptual way for the school district to properly plan for their future needs. Mr. Vito Francisco, Attorney representing Mr. Sylvester who owns 75 acres on the northeast corner of Highland and Haven Avenue, stated Mr. Sylvester requested him to voice their concern for the record because they intend to pursue this further with the Council. His concerns are that that property has had some detractors attached to it because of uncertainty of the Foothill Freeway. It now appears a mixed use designation is going to be causing Mr. Sylvester some problems because it is not extended to his northern boundary (Lemon Avenue). If this area is going to be designated as mixed use, they would like to have that designation extend to Lemon Avenue so they will at least have a uniform designation on the entire 75 acres. Planning Commission Minutes -9- November 22, 1978 Commissioner Garcia stated this property has been discussed in previous Commission meetings, at which time the decision was to retain the General Plan as it is now indicated. Mr. John Shurb, Lewis Homes, stated he owns property at 10009 Banyan. He stated he would like to compliment the Commission and members of the Staff for the work they have put into this proposal. Considering a short time frame, a masterful job has been done to come up with a workable plan. He stated during the process of considering the general plan, the Commission has eliminated quite a bit of high density residential. It may be found at a later date that more high density is required. Commissioner Garcia stated he has wondered if we really have sufficient high density in our community although we do have provisions within the alternative sections to allow high density and mixed uses within the plan. He asked Mr. Lam if we are actually providing enough high density within the community or are we a little bit short? Mr. Lam stated overall, in terms of this particular document, this community's provision for high density is somewhat less then typical. At the housing element stage the City will have to address the whole issue of adequacy of housing and multiple family units in this community. The State of California has taken a greater interest in insuring that communities provide enough rental housing for those that can not afford to purchase homes. Commissioner Tolstoy stated there are two things on the general plan which he would like to see a little different. The first one being high density residen- tial. He doesn't feel there is enough high density; however, he feels there is an opportunity to come back at a later date to take another look at that. He feels it would be reasonable to review the plan in the future regarding the development of the freeway. This may change the plan one way or the other. If we don't get the freeway, more circulation will be needed east and west through the city. Also at that time there will be further opportunity to look at high density. He stated the other thing he doesn't like about the Plan is the Chaffey College situation. He has been reading some of the things that went on before we became a city and how many times people from this area went to the County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors meetings and how many times they were treated discourteously. That is one of the reasons why the people became discouraged. This might be taken care of by the fact that Commissioner Garcia, as part of his motion to keep the designation as shown on the map, indicated this as a study area. As far as the Plan as a whole is considered, he feels it is a good plan. He feels the Commission has listened well to the community and in many cases have made changes to the Plan because of input received. Commissioner Garcia stated when the Commission started review of the Plan, differing input was obtained from the community. The basic concept and goals of the Commission were to develop a community that.would integrate the three communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda and to be a model city in Southern California. A basic element was to develop a`focal;point, w&ich has been accomplished in Alternative A. The plan in Alta Loma and part of Cucamonga is mostly residential. To the northeast, there is more of a low density type ecrvironment serving natural resources. In the southeast portion, we have con- centrated on industrial usage. In the near future, he would like to tackle thoroughly the circulation issue. As the land is developed to the east of Haven, he would like to see more east/west street patterns. He feels the school district has Planning Commission Minutes _lp_ November 22, 1978 provided a good indication where potential locations will be in regard to population growth. It is his opinion that we have done a very good job in terms of addressing the community needs. He is also pleased to find most of the community and citizens were receptive to progressive planning. Chairman Rempel stated his reason for voting for medium density residential around the Chaffey College was the fact that we tend to limit people by income as to what area of the city they can live. The only way to get the reduced cost housing is to have the higher density housing so that people of lower income brackets can live in scenic areas as well as people of higher income brackets. We have touched on this issue briefly in our review however in the preparation of the housing element this is something we must explore more fully. He indicated he is concerned about circulation. If the freeway is never built we have a serious east/west circulation problem in our city. This will definitely take a lot of investigation in the not-too distant future as the city develops. Commissioner Dahl stated he would like to add that he feels the Commission has been very responsive to the publics response or questions regarding the master plan. We have tried to maintain wherever possible an area of open space which is evidenced by the Windrow areas. We have tried to open up our areas of mixed use which would allow us flexibility to bring in different types of development within that area. We have also tried to, wherever possible, increase high den- sity areas within the city. We have been somewhat limited on that issue because so many areas are already developed and there is difficulty in retrofitting high density. We have attempted to buffer areas around the large industrial area to keep the areas from having problems as far as noise, pollution or other undesirable things that could come out of living near an industrial area. He feels we have tried to eliminate strip commercial which can generally become an eyesore. As develop- ments are proposed in the future, we will take a hard look at every item that comes in along areas that could be developed commercially. He is personally very pleased with the input received from the people in the area as a whole and we have done our best to try to meet all of the issues that were brought to us. Commissioner Jones stated she feels the aesthetics that we demanded at the very beginning are beginning to show now down in the industrial area. The landscaping and design standards will be developed more at a later date. She would like to see the power lines changed. She would like to see more of the planned unit developments or cluster homes because in that way we could possibly get more apartments as a trade off for open space. She stated on the whole she will have to agree with what the other Commissioners have said and that we have done our best. Chairman Rempel stated he would like to thank the community for their input in the last few months. This input has given us a tremendous amount of knowledge about the community and without that we would still be trying to decide what should go where. He hopes that as we move along with the rest of the elements that we will continue to get a lot of input from the public. A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and una- nimously carried to close the public hearing on the land use, circulation and public facilities element of the General Plan. Public Hearing closed. Planning Commission Minutes -11- November 22, 1978 At this time, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Report. Mr. Marlin Dickey, Professor of Geology, Chaffey College, stated he has submitted a written report to the Planning Commission which he has put together with Mr. Rod Parcel, Associate Professor of Geology for Chaffey College regarding their evalua- tion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the proposed Land Use Plan for the City. He stated he would like to read this report in detail for the benefit of all those present (copy of report on file in the Planning Division). He reported pro- blems that have not been identified in the DEIR are such things as the geological impacts of earthquake, ground rupture and ground creep; secondary shaking; mass movement; settling; liquifaction; dams, debris basins or reservoirs and loss of mineral resources. Other problems that have not been adequately discussed are changes in: natural drainage, natural flora and fauna, ground water and pollution. He indicated earth science information must be available to planners as early as possible in the planning process for a number of reasons which he reviewed for the audience. Land capability maps must be prepared and used to indicate problems. The DEIR should state the philosophy and objectives clearly and concisely. The community should be made as safe as possible from natural and artificial hazards. Commissioner Garcia stated he feels Professor Dickey's comments are to the point. The issue of the faults and seismic analysis is necessary. Perhaps it would be good to add a statement in the general plan that indicates that earthquake faults and seismic safety should be analyzed prior to any development. Ted Hopson, City Attorney, stated the seismic safety element is a required element of the general plan. If the plan indicates a problem area, prior to development, it would require a full blown environmental impact report to discuss mitigating measures in order to alleviate any problems. Commissioner Dahl stated the general plan lists the three earthquake faults that are within:or ;near the city limits. Mr. Marlin Dickey stated there are yet three other faults within the community. He doesn~t feel the general plan should be developed prior to examination of all elements. Jack Lam stated the information Mr. Dickey has presented is very important. Many communities have not been as concerned about seismic safety as they should be. This is one of the reasons the state mandated this element to address the seismic safety as well as other natural disaster hazards. While we agree that this has to be looked at, the only point of questioning he has is that CEQA was set up not to make an EIR a policy document but informational one to discuss possible enviro mental effects available at the time. It is appazent that there are certain earthquake faults, and if we have this knowledge perhaps this could be indicated at this time if they are widely recognized as potentially hazardous areas to the point where a special study area should be established. If informa- tion concerning earthquake faults is currently•available'these should be made available to our staff so that when any development occurs within these areas, we can make proper justifications before any project is brought before the Commission. He indicated this can be recognized as an interim policy and recognized through the impact report not in a policy way but as an information point so that knowledge is available. The policy will not be addressed until review is made of the seismic safety element. He stated there is now a moratorium on residential construction Planning Commission Minutes _12_ November 22, 1978 and any housing constructed now is a result of permits issued by the County or those which were approved prior to the moratorium. The whole issue of how to deal with growth management in the city is being discussed at this time and whether or not the moratorium should be continued. Certain developments may be released in terms of new sewer allocation. This development would not be any project that the city has had any review on. All existing tentatives not approved yet which are on file, will be asked to withdraw their appli- . cation or have them treated as new applications. The school district is dis- cussing the possibility of continuing the total moratorium further. Mr. Dickey asked if we can't ask that a development on a known fault be re-evaluated? Jack Lam stated those developments that have already received negative declarations issued by the County are approved and could not be re-evaluated. Mrs. Muriel Zimmerman, Instructor in the Biology Department at Chaffey College, stated she submitted a written report to the Planning Division (tfiis report is on file in the Planning Division), concerning her comments on the draft EIR. She stated her comments are in regard to the flora and fauna. The report doesn't include any of the statements with regard to natural flora and fauna in the com- munity and the detrimental impacts it would have because of the land use. No comments were made about the flora and rare and endangered species within the city limits. She does not mean to imply that the city should not develop in order to preserve the flora and fauna. However, she feels that the DEIR should comment on these things and should note for the information of people that they are going to be removed with the development of the open space areas. This plan does preserve some areas and probably more than many cities; however, she would think the EIR should definitely address these things and make statements about the effect of the development of the city on the natural flora and fauna of the city. A study should be conducted regarding this matter. The Biology Faculty has available expertise and would be quite willing to be consulted in any way to help with regard to the biologic impacts. Mr. Robert Smith stated he has lived in Alta Loma since 1965. He stated the preservation of the rural character and local control of the planning of the community were reasons of incorporating. When he looks at this plan he does not see a rural atmosphere but a suburb. Mr. John Tindell, stated he is a Vista Volunteer with Inland Counties Legal Ser- vices. He indicated Nate Rosenberg couldn't stay at this meeting this evening. Mr. Rosenberg asked him to commend the Commission for the work that they have put into the new city. There is still a lot of work to do. He indicated they represent the poor people in their work. They have worked with a lot of cities in their housing element and if we see any kind of pattern where they feel that poor people are being excluded they would try to come in and advise us of this. This city has a unique opportunity to plan its city in an ideal way. He stated at this time there are many elements that are not addressed in the draft EIR. Planning Commission Minutes -13- November 22, 1978 f • • Chairman Rempel stated we have not taken the housing element or any of the other seven required elements into consideration in this draft EIR. This EIR is for the land use, circulation and public facilities elements. There will be another draft EIR on the rest of the elements. Each of the elements is briefly indicated in this draft EIR; however, we will go into much detail with each element in the near future. Jack Lam stated if anyone has specific information to provide regarding the draft EIR or the Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements and Map of the General Plan, this information should be provided prior to the next meeting so that this can be incorporated into the document 'prior to that meeting if possible. Commissioner Jones stated Chaffey College should be thanked for the information they have given us in regard to the General Plan. Chairman Rempel stated he would agree wholeheartedly. Any input anybody in the community can give to add to our knowledge in developing the future of our city is most welcome. A Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to continue review of the Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements and Map of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan including the Draft Environmental Impact Report to December 13, 1978. AYES: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, DAHL, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE MOTION CARRIED ~ ~ ~ CONSENT CALENDAR Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 4749 - Bello - Request to divide 105 acres into 17 industrial lots for development located east of the Devore Freeway on the north side of San Bernardino Road (4th Street) in the M-2 zone. Commissioner Garcia stated the reason he pulled this item off the Consent Calendar is he would like to know a little more about this project. Is this an existing subdivision? Lloyd Hubbs stated basically this map is an existing situation. The roadways have been constructed at this time. There are some illegal parcels; this map is intended to create legal parcels through the parcel map procedure. There are no development proposals at this time. Zt is merely a situation to try and clean up the illegal lots. Mr. Eugene Bello, applicant, representing the owners, stated the owners are not asking for any more lots then are already existing. Some of these lots are in escrow and the title company has asked that the separate parcels be shown in order that individual lot identifications are indicated. Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1978 -14- •. ~. Commissioner Garcia stated he does not see that there would be any problem with this Negative Declaration. A Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to approve the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 4749. * ~ * * ~ ADJOURNMENT Upon Motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 1978 to a Special Meeting on November 29, 1978 in the Community Services Building, to discuss Growth Management. Meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respe~ct~fu~lQly~ submitted, `-~ W~/uv JACK LAM, Director of Community Development Planning Commission Minutes Page 15 of 15 November 22, 1978 ;w; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 21, 1978 CALL TO ORDER The study session of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Central School District Board Room The session was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairman Rempel. ~ ~ ~ * ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: COP4IISSIONERS: Herman Rempel, _P eter Tdls£oy; Laura Jbnes ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl and~.Jorge Garcia ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Barry Hogan, Bill Hofman, Councilman Jon Mikels, Ted Hopson and representatives of the various school districts * ~ * ~ Chairman'Rempel asked each of the districts to review their opinions and desires in regard to the current moratorium and proposed growth management plan. Cucamonga School District expressed a desire that the moratorium be lifted but had no> comments on a growth management plan. Central School District indicated that they are currently on double session and are in the process of purchasing portable units for assembly on a new site to eliminate the double session. The current enrollment of the school district is now at 2300, by 1980, if the moratorium is lifted, the enrollment would be 2800. Central School District's preference was that the moratorium remain. Alta Loma School District said that about 90% of the 800 dwelling units that are pending are in their school district. Currently 1763 dwelling units are under construction within their district. With 561 available for sale now, 1049 students total are expected out of the units currently under construction. They are on double session and are hopeful that with the opening of the new Stork School in February, double session will be eliminated. Additionally, there would be some leeway for absorbing additional students of the district. The capacity is approximately 3500 students in the K-6 category. Currently, they are on triple session at the junior high school, but should be minimized in the nearrfuture. They wholeheartedly favor continuation of the :moratorium for at least a year before they would be able to support lifting the moratorium. Page 1 of 2 .r, ~ ~ Etiwanda School District supports a growth management concept. They said that they can absorb approximately 75 students at this time. They indicate that they have no bond money and therefore they need to gain as many dollars as they can through the implementation of SB201 or some alternative method. Chaffey High School District supports the continuation of'the moratorium. They have approximately 2600 students now at Alta Loma High School and are operating at approximately 100 less than they have students than they had anticipated. They believe that they need more money from SB201 if the mora- torium were to be lifted. They support dealing with developers in lieu of the funds going through the City for~SB201. They~would~support the growth manage-~ ment plan if the City lifts the moratorium. However, they'stressed the fact that they are now on a 10 period day, (6 periods being a normal day) and would object to the lifting of the moratorium. Ken Willis of the B.I.A. expressed concern that a moratorium. would in fact be punishing.a single industry within the community and would adversely impact jobs and incomes. Mr. Willis suggested-that instead of taking the moratorium approach,-that all interested parties begin identifying specific problems and trying to develop solutions for these problems. .. .. Chairman Rempel thanked the developers and the school districts for their input regarding the possible lifting of the moratorium and the growth management plan. The Planning Commission then voted to continue further discussion of this item to November 29, 1978'. Meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Rewspectfully submitted, JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JL:BKH:em .' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 8, 1978 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cuca- monga, on Wednesday, November 8, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p. m. by Chairman Rempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. * ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy, Herman Rempel ABSENT: NONE ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Barry Hogan, Senior Planner; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Associate Planner; and Nancy McAllister, Secretary ~ * ~ ~ ~ APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon Motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unani- mously carried, the Planning Commission minutes of October 19, 1978 were approved as submitted. * * ~ STAFF COMMUNICATION Sack Lam, Director of Community Development, reported the Fall Conference of the San Bernardino Planning Commissioners Association has been scheduled for November 17, 1978. He .indicated this will be a very good planning session and recommended that the Commission consider attending this conference. He stated reservations for this conference need to be made soon and asked which Planning Commission members are planning to attend. Commissioners Jones, Garcia, Rempel, Tolstoy and Dahl all indicated they plan on attending this conference. ~ ~ ~ ~ Page 1 of 19 v .~.. • • STAFF COMMUNICATION Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, introduced Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. * * * ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit No. 78-01 -Vanir Research Co. - The development of a neighborhood commercial shopping center to be located on the northwest corner of 19th and Archibald. Jack Lam reported the Commission at its October 19, 1978 meeting, reviewed the •p m posed General Plan in regard to the number of neighborhood shopping centers at the intersection of 19th Street and Archibald. The proposed General Plan presently shows one center on the northeast corner which has recently been constructed. It was the Commissions recommendation that it was poor planning practice to allow additional shop ping centers at this intersection as there are several other centers existing and under construction which can more than adequately serve this area. Due to the fact the Com- mission did make a decision recognizing residential rather than commercial uses on this corner, the law requires that the proposed use will not have a reasonable poten- tial of beingc~,.consistent with the proposed general plan. The Commission should deny the application with the findings. Chairman Rempel asked the Commission for questions of Staff. Stan Tomlinson, representing Vanir Development Co., asked that they be given the opportunity to make a presentation of their site plan. Ted Hopson, City Attorney, stated under government code, unless the Commission is pre- pared to make a finding that there is reasonable probability,that~the land ,use .pro posed will be consistent with the adopted general plan proposal,`iE would-tSe'academic hearing the matter at this :time and would tend to cloud the reasons for denial. Commmissioner Garcia asked under due process, if the Commission should grant the appli- cant a hearing regardless of what recommendation has taken place on the General Plan. Mr. Hopson stated that the applicant is not being denied due process..._'~ Commissioner Garcia asked if the applicant was advised of the circumstances of the situation at the time they requested to be agendized. Mr. Lam stated the applicants were given the option of withdrawing, continuing or having it held before the Commission knowing it meant automatic denial. The Planning Division did not get any response; therefore, this Conditional Use Permit was placed on this Agenda. Commissioner Garcia stated he feels the applicant was hoping to be heard tonight with the idea that the Commission might change their mind regarding the General Plan for this area. Mr. Tomlinson stated that they are prepared to give a good presentation on their proposed development which might alter the Commission's previous decision. Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 8, 1978 1_ Mr. Lam stated in order for the Commission to review the site plans for this development, the Commission would need to reverse its decision on the general plan first. Chairman Rempel stated under those conditions, if the Commission desires to discuss reconsideration, it should be brought up under the General Plan .section of the Agenda. He indicated that a decision has been made on this area and he=would not like the decision to be changed at this time. A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unani- mously carried to continue this item until after Item F, the Rancho Cucamonga pro- posed General Plan, is reviewed. AYES: DAHL, TDLSTOY, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * * ~ ~ Conditional Use Permit No. 78-02 - Robinson-Jensen Development Company - The development of a Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center on the southeast corner of 19th and Archibald. A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy-and unani- mously carried to continue this item until after Item F, the Rancho Cucamonga pro- posed General Plan. AYES: DAHL, TOLSTDY, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Zone Change No. 78-02 - Secondo Colombero - To change the zone from C-2 and M-R to M-2 for approximately 9.3 acres located on the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Whit tram. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report in detail. He reported the General Plan indicates major industry for the area. The proposed zone change is consistent with the proposed general plan and the site is suitable in size and shape to accommodate the uses permitted in the proposed zone. The uses in said zone are compatible with adjacent land uses and future development in the immediate area. Approval of Resolution No. 78-28 was recommended and such recommendation be forwarded to the City Council for approval. Chairman Rempel asked the Commission for questions of Staff. There being none, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Colombero, applicant, stated he has no comments at this time but would be happy to answer any questions from the Commission. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -3- November 8, 1978 Commissioner Garcia stated in analyzing the project, he feels it is compatible with the goals and objectives of the proposed General Plan, and therefore has no objections to the zone change. There being noafurther discussion, a Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-28 as sub- mittedrand that this recommendation be forwarded to the City Council. AYES: GARCL9, DAHL, JONES, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ * ~ Site Approval No. 78-03 - Ed Young - The development of a nursery/day care facility to be located at 9817 Baseline - R-1 zone. Commissioner Dahl excused himself at this time as he stated he is a friend of the applicant. Michael Vairin, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail. Engineering and Planning Division Staffs have been working with Mr. Young to improve his plan by providing street improvements, more parking, and a single access. Staff has recom- mended revisions to which the applicant has agreed. He indicated as there can be only 10 parking spaces provided on the site, the facility must be limited to the care of forty children to meet:`.parking requirements. Staff recommends that the Planning Com- mission, following the public hearing, approve the Site Approval based on the findings and conditions listed in Resolution No. 78-30. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Mr. Vairin stated Staff would like to recommend that Condition 1116. be amended as follows: That any signs be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to installation and all existing signs on and off site shall be removed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the pool area is fenced. Mr. Vairin stated yes, the south portion has a block wall and the other portions are enclosed by a 6' grape stake wood fence which appeared to be nonclimbable from the outside. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the proposed play yard fencing is proposed as a block wall or chain link fence. Mr. Vairin stated they are proposing to use the existing fencing which is presently wood. The commercial center to the west will be building a block wall and he is planning a block wall for the southerly portion at a later date. The yard will all be entirely fenced now but will not all be block wall until sometime in the future. Commissioner Garcia asked for an explanation from the Engineering Division regarding the street improvements. Planning Commission Minutes -q- November 8; 1978 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated Baseline is one of our major arterial streets. East of Archibald it has been widened. The development of a shopping center by Diversified Development Company on the corner of Archibald and Baseline will widen the street on the south side to the master plan width. If no improvements are made at the site in question, it will create an island. It is vital that this situation is taken care of in order to prevent a hazardous situation. Normally, the applicant would be required to improve the street. The applicant indicated that he can not stand the financial burden. If improvement is a condition he will drop his application and not do anything at this time. If that were the case, the City would probably be forced to purchase the land for that portion and provide the street improvements with city funds. Therefore, we have chosen to work out a compromise with the applicant and the adjacent shopping center, whereby the cost of the street improvements can be shared three ways. This will be subject to approval of the City Council. The alter- native is to have the applicant provide full improvements or modify assessment to loan him and pay back over a five year period. The way the condition is written in the Resolution requires the applicant to participate in the improvements, allow either item of assessment district or sharing by the City. The; applicant may wish to speak - regarding.this issue. Mr. Young, applicant, states he is quite happy with the presentation submitted to this point. He would like to request that the pupil limitation be increased to 48 instead of 40 children required by the Planning Division. He does not feel they would have a parking problem because the majority of the people coming in do not stay for any length of time. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Garcia asked if the City Engineer has an estimate of the street improve- ment costs. Lloyd Hubbs estimated $5,000 total for the street frontage. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the request to increase the number of children on the site would be up to the County Licensing Agency. Mr. Vairin stated the reason staff limited the facility to 40 children is because of parking ratio. If more children were allowed, this would be in conflict with ordi- nance requirements for parking. Chairman Rempel stated he would not be in favor of allowing more children unless the parking is increased. City Attorney stated that to vary from the parking requirements allowed by ordinance, it would take a Variance which would require another public hearing. After further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Com- missioner Garcia and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-30 with the follow- ing additions and changes: 1. Engineering Condition l13 - Add the word "water". The condition should read: The property should not gather water by artificial means and discharge it onto (lower) properties in greater concentration than would naturally be discharged. -5 .November 8, 1978 planning Commission Minute 2. Amend Condition 1116 as follows: That any signs be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to installation and all existing signs on and off site be removed. 3. Planning Division recommendation 1111 amended as follows: That the parking lot improvements such as paving, striping and 6" raised concrete curbs be installed at the time of street improvements. The remaining improvements such as landscaping and exterior building elevations shall be installed by November 8, 1979. AYES: TOLSTOY, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: DAHL ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ * ~ PUBLIC HEARING Access Policy for Major and Secondary Highways - Initiated by Rancho Cucamonga Plan- ning Coumiission. Jack Lam stated the Chamber of Cormnerce and B.I.A. has requested that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 1978 in order that they may have more time to review this item. A Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unani- mously carried to continue the Access Policy for Major and Secondary Highways to November 22, 1978. AYES: GARCIA, JONES, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSINT: NONE ~ * * * ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 8:10 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. * ~ ~ * ~ At this time, Chairman Rempel asked that the Consent Calendar items be reviewed. There being no discussion on the Consent Calendar items, a motion was made by Commis- sioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to accept the Consent .. Calendar items as presented. AYES: TOLSTOY, JONES, DAHL, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * ~ ~ ~ Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 8, 1978 The Rancho Cucamonga Proposed General Plan 1. Chaffey College Presentation 2. Remaining Individual Concerns Jack Lam stated it was anticipated from the previous meetings that tonight would be the last meeting for the land use element with a rap up and a recommendation forwarded to the City Council. The Commission has been working on the General Plan since April, and has conducted numerous public hearings since that time. During the last couple of months the Commission has been hearing individual concerns from developers and property owners. After a certain period of consideration, the Commission should develop a specific recommendation to the Council so that they can conduct their public hearings and adopt the plan as soon as possible. Staff has received a number of concerns regarding the draft Environmental Impact Report and time is now needed to properly integrate some of these comments into the draft EIR. This draft EIR can be brought back to the Commis- sion at the next regular meeting on November 22, 1978 at which time the Commission may consider adoption, and formulate a final recommendation to the Council. He suggested that the Commission consider tonight as the last meeting to review individual agen- dized concerns otherwise these discussions could continue forever. The Commission has made great efforts in conducting numerous meetings. If the Commission concurs, a state- ment of concurrence should be made to agendize that meeting as the last formal public hearing at the Commission level. Commissioner Garcia asked if the Sign Ordinance and Growth Management are also going to be discussed at the meeting of November 22, 1978. Mr. Lam stated those items need further review before being scheduled. Regarding Growth Management, the Commission is to meet with the school district, B.I.A., and other utili- ties to discuss the whole issue of school problems and growth management. This meeting is scheduled for November 21, 1978 at the Central School District Board Room from 5 to 7 p.m. Regarding the Sign Ordinance, the Chamber of Commerce has given Staff some input and we need time to revise the draft in order that it can be available for the public hearing. Regarding the General Plan, Jack Lam stated Sohn Blayney is present at the meeting and can answer any questions the Commission might have concerning the proposed general plan. It was the concensus of the Commission that the November 22, 1978 meeting be the last meeting in which to discuss individual agendized items concerning the land use element. CHAFFEY COLLEGE PRESENTATION Jack Lam stated the College has communicated a disagreement with the higher density surrounding the College as shown on the proposed land use element. After the Commis- sion discussed this, they modified its position and made a motion for medium density residential rather than high density residential near the college. Since that time, there has been some question as to whether or not the college is in agreement with the medium density residential. The Staff position in regard to land use around the college is that, as a public facility in a community, any character of land use may be successful if properly planned and adverse impacts mitigated through proper development control. This means that the Commission should determine what kind of character a com- munity college should have in Rancho Cucamonga.. This then is a major policy issue, one which the Commission should decide after all input has been received regarding the subj ect. Planning Commission Minutes -7- November 8, 1978 Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Catanzaro, President of Chaffey College, stated he concurs with Mr. Lam._' There are several levels at the college and therefore some of the opinions expressed by the spokespersons at the college may differ to some degree. He stated the Board of Trustees has adopted a resolution at which time the Board took no position regarding the specific development of land contiguous to the College. He read the Resolution in detail for the Commission which states "Chaffey College supports the principle of a well thought out and documented general plan for Rancho Cucamonga based on all elements necessary for the development of a plan including traffic, seismic, public safety, fire, flood and a proper environmental impact report. Because of the available expertise at Chaffey College and the location of the College within the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga, the college should take an active role in the planning of the community. Chaffey College is directly affected by the development of the land adja- cent to the campus. The college should be consulted and have a voice in the decision making process prior to the development of the land. Any adverse effects of such development of these lands should be mitigated prior to development." Dr. Hartley, Ph.D., Chairman of the Chaffey College Faculty Senate, stated there has been confusion as to what the College wants. The Faculty Senate is the elected official representative of the entire faculty of. the college. Therefore, the proposal he is presenting this evening is the official proposal of the faculty of the college. During the last two months, the faculty at the college has undertaken a careful study of the possible alternative land use patterns around the campus. Through meetings with the staff and Commission, they feel they have been given the opportunity to express their concerns. The faculty recognizes their responsibility and obligation to provide time, efforts, and expertise to the city in any way they can to help bring about the most beneficial development of the city. The community has the right to expect insti- tutions of higher education to express concerns for the natural state of the land and to speak in favor of ,protecting the community from natural and artificial hazards. He stated the Faculty~Senate proposes the following recommendation concerning land use in the area adjacent to the college campus. The property to the east should reflect natural open space in this area which would preserve a natural corridor from the College to the Chaffey Regional Park. The use of the properties north, west and south, within 2,000 feet of the college should be residential, very low density for numerous reasons which he reviewed for the Commission (letter on file in the Planning Division). They feel higher density development would pose burdensome security problems and would require additional expenditures for security services and fencing. It would create detrimental usage of the College grounds and increased vandalism. It would increase traffic around the college requiring upgrading of streets and signals. It would pose heavy demand and usage of open lands east of the College that should be preserved. Also, heavier development would not be in the best interest of community safety due to large concen- trated population in the proximity of the Red Hill fault located immediately south of the college campus. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Mr. Dickey of the College could show us where the Red Hill Fault is located. Mr. Dickey, Professor of Geology at the College, reviewed the Red Hill Fault for the Commission. Jack Lam stated in terms of geologic hazards, no thorough investigation has been made at this time. Information concerning faults not recognized on the constraints map should be indicated so that proper studies can be made if a proposal is submitted near or around this area. Planning Commission Minutes -8 November 8, 1978 Chairman Rempel stated as far as noise, it has been found that the higher density housing has less an impact as far as noise then the lower densities. Commissioner Dahl stated he is concerned about the statement made regarding the security aspect of the college. He does not know that medium density residential areas are more subject to vandalism than very low density residential. Dr. Hartley stated this is an isolated, suburban campus which has kept their security to a complete minimum. As the population is increased, the grater the impact is going to be on the campus. Commissioner Dahl stated there is apartment type complexes around the Mt. Sac College which services the college. This is a community college similar to Chaffey College. He asked if there is a possibility that medium density residential would better be able to serve this college. Dr. Hartley stated in their studies indicate that high density housing that might go in will price students out of the market. When brand new units are developed, there is a good liklihood they will be very expensive units. The population of the community college students has changed. Their studies indicate the majority of the students are~in their middle 20's, most of them married and already live in houses. They are not potential apartment dwellers. He stated they would like to do everything possible to keep the campus open for public use. They are afraid medium or above densities will preclude them from leaving the facility open to the community. Chairman Rempel stated he doesn't feel this area is good for low density residential. It is an area that should be developed residentially because it can not be used for farm land due to i.ts poor quality. Dr. Hartley skated their goal is to ask the Commission to adopt a level of density in keeping with how the campus was built and planned. Commissioner Garcia asked what is the projection of student population >n the next ten years. Dr. Hartley stated the current population is approximately 10,000 students; the poten- tial growth is easily twice that amount. However, this is just his estimate of what could happen. Marta Duma, Biology student at Chaffey College, stated it is her opinion medium to high density development would increase access to this land thereby causing damage to flora and fauna, some of it being rather rare. If the campus is slightly isolated, then parents or adult supervision is required where groups visit the campus as they would need to provide transportation for the children. If medium or high density development is allowed, the children could came to the campus without supervision and therefore security would have to be increased. She stated she would like to see the area low density residential or less. Preferably she would like to see a green belt but would be willing to compromise and see low density housing around the campus. Bob Smith stated he lives on Hillside about one mile from Chaffey College. He stated the City officials were elected to stop the run away growth that the County Supervisors were allowing. They do not want this City to be another San Bernardino Valley or Orange County. Streets and schools are now below adequacy for the population here at the present time. His opinion is that high density or anything above low density is going against what would be best for the community. Planning Commission Minutes -9- November 8, 1978 Peter Tolley, Alta Loma, stated he has talked to people who live in Corona and. Norco who attend Chaffey College. They have indicated they would not live near the college as they feel it would be too expensive. They feel it is cheaper to drive to Chaffey. He does not feel apartment development would be good for the area. ' Chairman Rempel stated he would like to clarify that the Land Use Element does not now show high density development for this area, but medium density. That means 5 to 15 units per acre. The zoning map which will be developed later can zone that area from low density up to 15 units per acre. Peter Tolley stated he does not feel medium density development would service the community in this area as people will not live in that area to go to college. Mr. Vito Francisco, Attorney for Jack Sylvester who owns 75 acres on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland below the college stated the area from Highland to the mountains is worthless from the standpoint of farming. This area is very rocky soil. Mr. Sylvester's position is that the highest and best use of this property is for a shopping center site and if not then for high density type dwellings with mixed use along Highland and Haven Avenues and high density housing in the rear of the property. Mr. Sylvester stated at the time he bought the 75 acres on the northeast corner of Highland and Haven, the Foothill Freeway map indicated that corner was to be an off ramp. The people that sold the property to him had received a shopping center permit which they didn't activate. This would be a natural place for a shopping center to service all those people at Chaffey College. He stated one of the biggest shopping center developers in the world has had his property under option. for a regional center for the past 9 months. They still have it under option and they don't take options until they have made certain studies as to feasibility and his option is based on that feasibility study. He was told the reason John Blayney modified the general plan for his property was based primarily on the proposed taking of about 12 acres for the Foot- hill Freeway. He has authorized his lawyer to take legal action against Caltrans and the County to find out once and for all if the Foothill Freeway is going to take place or not. Commissioner Tolstoy asked Mr. Sylvester how far north does this property extend. Mr. Sylvester stated they go up to Lemon Avenue. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the property under consideration at this time is north of Lemon Avenue.. Mr. Jerry :Levitz stated they own 7 1/2 acres at the northwest corner of Lemon and Haven. The map shows mixed use. They have property between Haven and Hermosa south of Wilson. That property is being proposed as low density which means 1.5 or 1.6 to the acre. He stated if this is indicated for this property, they will have to build $150,000 houses. This is not affordable housing next to a college. They feel the area at the corner of Lemon and Haven would allow for affordable housing. -10- Planning Cofimsson Minutes November 8, 1978 Mrs. Kathryn Bridge, Alta Loma, stated they have tried to get Haven Avenue as a scenic. highway leading to the college. She asked that the Commission and staff do a specific design plan for Chaffey with the idea of avoiding problems that Dr. Hartley mentioned earlier". The traffic developed for medium density won't be good for the students. The medium density would generate traffic going out from the area at the same time students are coming into the area. Commissioner Garcia stated he would like to hear from the consultant regarding this issue. Mr. John Blayney, Consultant, stated the very low density which means half acre or larger lots, occupies a rather large section of the community now. This is housing affordable by a small segment of the community. The higher density was put around the college because it was felt same students would live in apartments and could walk to and from the college. On the question of security, if facing the position that the more people there: are the more security problems there are, then if the City is going to have people living in apartments in the City at all, the security problem will exist somewhere. A variety of housing types is needed in all parts of the community. He feels those living in expensive houses tend to be not very tolerant of a lot of things that go on in and around colleges. Those living in apartments expect more activity, more noise, more traffic, etc. Access to open space could be easily accomplished. The County Flood Control District owns property to the east of the college, which it is hoped some day will become a regional pazk. Regarding the earthquake fault in the area, we need to know where this is before any development can be approved there. In regard to.Mr. Sylvester's property, yes, we did propose a regional shopping center site. When better information for the Foothill Freeway was developed, it was found-:this would not be an adequate site. The configuration of the area would be too elongated causing traffic problems. A neighborhood center was proposed on that site or across the street. One site could be a neighborhood center, the other site used for mixed use. Commissioner Dahl stated he would like to make a motion to retain our previous findings which indicated medium density from 5 to 15 units per gross acre for the areas on the west, south and east side of Chaffey College. Commissioner Garcia stated he would like to have the opportunity to discuss the issue prior to seconding the motion. He stated he would like to discuss a recommendation of 2,000 feet around the college to be left open in order to provide a lower scale of environment with the property below that left medium density residential. He would like to discuss this possibility. Chairman Rempel stated that 2,000 feet will take practically the entire area we are talking about. That would leave the area low density instead of the medium density residential previously, decided on. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would be receptive to a transition zone around the college. Chairman Rempel stated he feels that the medium density of 5 to 15 units per acre should be required. Each development that is considered should be looked at to insure proper protection to the college. A Planned Unit Development could perhaps be considered which would move the units away and could be very well done. The Commission would have to look at each development coming in. Commissioner Gazcia stated he feels a specific plan of the area is needed in order to insure proper development. -11- Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1978 After further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to retain the medium density designation on the General Plan with a statement in the General Plan that any development in the area have a special study. AYES: GARCIA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: JONES ABSENT: NONE ~ * ~ ~ ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 10:05 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 10:20 p.m. * ~ * ~ ~ REMAINING INDIVIDUAL CONCERNS - GENERAL PLAN South side of Foothill, east of Vin Jack _Lam reviewed the Staff Report in detail. He stated the General Plan desig- nates high density for this area and the owner desires commercial. He stated the Commission had discussed the issue of commercial on both the north and south side of Foothill with an eye toward restricting the development of the commercial strip along its entirety. This is accomplished by varying commercial and residential in key areas to maintain a dynamic balance of land uses. The south side of Foothill in this area is large enough and deep enough to support high density uses and incor- porate adequate buffers from Foothill. Commercial use could worsen the ingress and egress problems off of Foothill Blvd. between Vineyard and Hellman. Staff recommends that the General Plan designation of high density be retained. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Gil Rodriquez, owner of property, stated at one time this area was shown as commercial and has now changed to high density residential. He would like his property to be designated for commercial use. Jack Lam stated the Commission, during discussions, indicated that they would not look favorably to commercial as a continuous strip along Foothill Blvd. Therefore, the consultant revised the plan to reflect those concerns. Commissioner Garcia asked if there are flooding problems in this area. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated he believes with the completion of the Cucamonga Creek project, the flood hazard would be mitigated in this area. Commissioner Garcia asked why the north area was all shown commercial and the south side has been broken up into commercial and high density residential. Planning Commission Minutes -12- November 8, 1978 u,' `./ Jack Lam stated the Commission felt high density residential was appropriate in this area along Foothill Blvd. It would not require the number of curb cuts which would allow for abetter flow of traffic than would retail commercial uses. It would also act as a buffer between the continuous strip of commercial. Mr. Rodriquez stated he has 9 1/2 acres of property with frontage on Foothill and he stated if allowed to develop he would develop something very nice. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he personally feels there is too much commercial on Foothill Blvd. In the interest of good planning, it would be good to break that Blvd. up. He would be in favor of keeping the General Plan as it now stands. Commissioner Dahl stated if we change this high density residential area to commer- cial, we are going to find ourselves without enough high density areas. When we lose these high density areas, then we don't meet our requirements of some of the federal programs that bring money to our City. He would personally see no major impact on the City as a whole for a high density housing area in this area. Commissioner Jones stated she would agree with Commissioner Tolstoy and Commis- sioner Dahl. She would recommend that the high density residential remain. John Blayney stated at one time this area was shown as strip commercial; however, it was removed at the express request of the Commission. Chairman Rempel stated his opinion is that commercial designation is not good for that area. He feels mixed use where apartments and office buildings could be allowed would be a much more feasible answer. Mr. Gil Rodriquez stated he would be in favor of mixed use for this property. After further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried to retain the General Plan designation of high density for this area. AYES: TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES NOES: GARCIA, REMPEL ABSENT: NONE. __ * ~ Area: Southeast corner of Vineyard and San Bernardino Road Jack Lam reported the General Plan designates low density residential for this area and the property owner desires commercial office. Mr. Lam stated this property was formerly owned by the County for right of way improvements. According to the )Planninn Commission Y4inutes -13- November 8, 1978 Planning Coffinission Minutes "Noyember 8; 1978 owner, the County no longer wanted to retain this land and sold it at auction to the present owner. The northern portion of the land is, too narrow for the develop- ment of any use whatsoever. The southern portion that fronts on San Bernardino Road is 78 feet wide at its widest part and existing residences abut the property. The northern portion is a greater slope. Any remaining vacant parcel adjacent to a residential neighborhood should be continued as residential. It is conveivable that a small residence with access off of San Bernardino Road towards the eastern property line may be developed. Any use other than residential would create traffic conflicts detrimental to the intersection and create conflicts with adjacent residential uses. Staff recommends that low density residential be retained. Mr. Shay, property owner, stated he would like the Commission to consider commercial for this property. He would like to put a real estate office and art gallery on this property. He feels with the proper planning this could be accomplished. He does not feel residential should be allowed due to the amount of traffic on that corner. A nicely landscaped office would add nicely to the area. Commissioner Garcia stated it would be difficult to allow any commercial development in this location. What concerns him is the proximity for access into a development from the intersection. However, at the same time, he doesn't find a very good solu- tion for residential development on this property either. Chairman Rempel stated there is no commercial until Baseline Avenue. He does not feel commercial development should be approved for this location. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Com- missioner Garcia and unanimously carried to retain the General Plan designation of low density residential for subject property. AYES: DAHL, GARCIA, JONES, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mr. Vito Francisco, representing Mr. Sylvester asked that the Commission discuss the property on the northeast corner of Highland and Haven to Lemon Avenue. He asked that a mixed use designation be designated up to Lemon Avenue at the northern boundary of the property. Jack Lam stated the lines on the map in this area are general;.',however, it is possible to develop a specific plan to see the relationship between the different uses. Mr. Francisco stated he feels it would be logical to extend the mixed use designa- tion up to Mr. Sylvester's property line. Commissioner Garcia stated if an applicant intends to have a specific plan of the entire area, the Commission could address themselves to that at that time. ~ ~ * ~ Area: West side of Haven Avenue, north of the AT&SF Railroad Mr. Lam reviewed the staff report in detail. He reported the General Plan desig- nates subject area for low density residential. The owner of this property feels Planning Commission Minutes -14- Noy ember 8, 1978 low density residential is inappropriate for this site and would prefer an indus- trial designation. Currently existing on the property is the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard. He stated the area is bounded to the south by the railroad which has a spur running into the property. To the west is an older residential area buffered by Marine Avenue and to the north is an existing light industrial building. The sites proximity to Haven Avenue, the Railroad, and an existing industrial building makes it non-conducive to low density residential development. If planned well, a minimum impact industrial 'use would be compatible with the surrounding area. He recommended that the General Plan be modified to reflect a minimum impact industrial on the property bounded by Humboldt, Marine, 26th Street and Haven. Mr. Paul Hoffer, representing Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard asked that the Commission consider industrial for subject property. Chairman Rempel stated because of the railroad spur there is no question that this area should be designated industrial. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to modify the General Plan to reflect a minimum impact industrial on that property bounded by Humboldt, Marine, 26th Street and Haven. AYES: TOLSTOY, JONES, DAHL, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * ~ Review of Area on the northwest corner of 19th and Archibald. Request by Vanir Research Company The Director stated, "If the Commission would like to reconsider their previous motion to retain the area for high density residential, a motion to that effect will need to be made." The Cotrznission at a previous meeting upheld the present designation because they felt it was poor planning practice to allow additional shopping centers at this intersection; there are several other centers existing and under construction which can more than adequately serve the area. Since the Commissions decision was to retain high density residential, they cannot approve the site plan for commercial development on this property. The only way to consider the site plan is to reconsider the whole issue of land use. Commissioner Garcia stated many issues weren't discussed to his satisfaction at the last meeting. One of the major problems is traffic. There are no traffic signals on 19th and Archibald. At the last meeting, Commissioner Jones and Commissioner Dahl were not present and he would like to hear their comments. The Commissioners present at that meeting were very strong about their decision. Chairman Rempel stated the critical item is increased traffic that a commercial development would cause. -15- Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1978 ~, Commissioner Dahl stated the land could perhaps be put to a better use than high density residential. He would like to look at various alternatives that might be available such as mixed use which could give us the opportunity to develop different uses. He is not certain that the land is being put to its best use by a straight designation of high density residential. That is why he would like to reconsider the Planning Commission decision. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that 19th Street is a tremendous problem in this com- munity, especially if the freeway is not put through. Our Planning Consultant has indicated he is not in favor of shopping centers on all four corners of an intersection. We have some in our community now which cause many problems. His opinion is that this item should not be reconsidered at this time. Frank Dominguez, owner of property on the northwest corner of 19th and Archibald, stated he would urge the Commission to reconsider this area for commercial develop- ment. Commissioner Garcia stated we have to address ourselves to the basic issues of planning regardless of what has transpired. Therefore, he would move that the Commission not reconsider this area. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to retain the present general plan designation of high density residential for subject area. AYES: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Mr. Tomlinson, attorney for Mr. Dominguez asked that the Commission at least review their site plans. Commissioner Garcia stated this matter will have to go to the Council for any further consideration. Jack Lam stated the Commission can consider a presentation on the site plan but it becomes academic because they can't make a finding by the, government code once a finding contrary to the site plan has been made on the general plan. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the site plans might be done very nicely but not at this site. He stated he would hope that Vanir Research Company would come to the City and use their plan in an area which might allow this type of use. The City Attorney stated once the Commission has made a recommendation on the General Plan anyone can challenge a decision at the Council level. A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-25 denying Conditional Use Permit No. 78-01 for the development of a neighborhood shopping center to be located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald. AYES: DAHL, TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Planning Commission Minutes -16- November 8, 1978 A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-26 denying Conditional Use Permit No. 78-02 for the development of a neighborhood shopping center to be located on the southeast corner of 19th and Archibald. AYES: DAHL, TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * ~ NEW BUSINESS Director Review No. 78-42 - Federal Sign Company - A request to place a "Liquor" sign on each of the Stater Bros. stores located on the northeast corner of Carnelian and Baseline and on the northeast corner of Archibald and 19th Street. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report in detail. A uniform sign program was approved for each center as part of two separate Condi- tional Use Permits. The programs do not allow for "liquor" signs of this type. Further, signs are to be used for business identification purposes only. Staff feels that liquor signs are not appropriate or necessary in major shopping centers. Such signs tend to clutter the appearance of the center and disrupt uniform signing of the center. The commission should establish a policy on signs of this nature. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 78-27 denying Director Review No. 78-42 based on the findings contained therein. Commissioner Garcia stated that the proposed sign ordinance requires uniform signing throughout shopping centers. Mr. Sam Jerome, Supervisor for the Stater Brothers Markets, stated he would like to have this issue considered for approval. Stater Brothers stores in the past have never had a liquor department. They feel the sign is necessary to advise the public that they can service their liquor needs. They would like to be given the same consideration that Vons Market has. Jack Lam stated ahy signs approved by the Commission at this time will have a bearing on what you will or will not accept in the proposed sign ordinance. As for Vons market and other previously approved signs by the County, they will be nonconforming and will be amortized if the Commission adopts the sign ordinance which would not allow this type of sign. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what amortization period is suggested in the proposed sign ordinance. Commissioner Dahl stated our proposed ordinance will allow approximately one year for them to remove nonconforming signs. Commissioner Garcia stated it is the goal of the community that shopping center signing should be uniform. His opinion is that the sign proposed is excessive. He would not want to permit or entice this type of signing. It would not serve the purpose of providing good signing for the community. Planning Commission Minutes -17- November 8, 1978 A motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-27 denying Director Review No. 78-42 for the placement of a liquor sign on each of the two Stater Brothers Markets located on the northeast corners of 19th and Archibald Avenue and on the northeast corner of Baseline Avenue and Carnelian Avenue. AYES: GARCIA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL ~ ~ ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS Request for revisions to Tract No. 9589 - Request submitted by Mr. Bates Jack Lam stated Mr. Bates, applicant, has requested that this item be postponed to November 22, 1978. i A Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to postpone review of revisions to Tract 9589 to November 22, 1978 per the applicants request. AYES: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Commissioner Tolstoy stated we have been going through many decisions on the General Plan. One of the decisions that we have made was based on the premise that the City could or could not serve certain areas of the City on our borders. In one area there is a wash that goes through which seems to make a natural line for the City boundary to follow however there is a piece of land which belongs to our City. He wonders if something could be done about these areas. Would it be possible to talk to the City of Ontario about them annexing areas such as this. Jack Lam stated the City of Ontario has approached him on this particular piece of property on 6th Street and the wash. There is approximately three acres of land in this area which is presently undeveloped. It would be easier for the City of Ontario to service this property. There is also another piece of property on 8th Street and Vineyard which was discussed at the last meeting. Staff stated that since the whole area in the City of Ontario in this location is zoned residential, the property adjacent to Ontario area should be maintained residential. At that meeting, industrial was adopted by the Commission. He has since been in contact with the City of Ontario and they object very strongly to industrial, and they are preparing a statement to that effect. We are suggesting that these areas be considered for annexation by the City of Ontario. They are undeveloped areas at the present time and could be better serviced by the City of Ontario. He asked for a statement by the Commission of whether or not to pursue this with the City of Ontario to take proper steps of deannexing these properties and the properties located on the southeast corner of Vineyard and 8th Street, the Cucamonga Wash and 6th Street and another area located on 4th Street and the Cucamonga Wash. Planning Commission Minutes _18_ November 8, 1978 f Commissioner Dahl stated he is in favor of instructing the staff to pursue deannexation of subject properties. A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Rempel and unanimously carried to instruct staff to pursue deannexation of properties mentioned above and recommend the same to the City'Council. ~ ~ ~ * ~ ADJOURNMENT Upon Motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unani- mously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 1978. Meeting adjourned at 12:35 p.m. Resp crrtfull s ~bmitted, _,.~ l~ JACK LAM, Director of Community Development -19- Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1978 / p%_~ ~: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 25, 1978 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cuca- monga, on Wednesday, October 25, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Ctiairmaci Herman Rempel, who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ~ ~ * ~ ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy Herman Rempel ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon MOTION by Commissidner Gardia, seconded by Commissiocier Tdlstoy, and unani- mously carried, it was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of October 11, 1978 as submitted. ~ * * ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit No. 78=01 - The development of a Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center to be located on the northwest corner of 19th and Archibald - Request submitted by Vanir Research Company. Conditional Use Pemnit No. 78-02 - The development of a Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center on the southeast corner of 19th and Archibald - Request submitted by Robinson-Jensen Development Company. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development stated the Planning Division Staff recommends the continuance of public hearings for both of these projects to the November 8, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. Both of these projects are involved in a major general plan issue that must be resolved by the Commission prior to consideration of the site development plans. Staff has contacted each of the applicants and has discussed the necessity for resolving the General Plan issues prior to considering the site development plans for each of the centers. Both of the applicants have agreed to the continuance to the first meeting in November. Since the Commission has made their decisions on this matter, Staff will contact the applicant and ask them if they want to withdraw their applica- lions at this time or continue their review. ,, Planning Commission M•tes -2- • October 25, 1978 t ~. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, and unanimously carried to postpone review of Conditional Use Permit No. 78-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 78-02 to November 8, 1978. AYES: CONAfISSIONERS TOLSTOY, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE DAHL, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL * * ~ PUBLIC HEARING Zone Change No. 78-01 - To change the zone from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to A-P (Administration-Professional) for 1.629 acres located on the south side of Baseline between Garnet and Beryl Avenue -Request submitted by Coral Invest- ment, Inc. Michael Vairin, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported that the proposed change is in conformance with the proposed General Plan and compatible to surrounding uses. Staff recommends approval of this zone change. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Joe Panaseti, applicant, stated he has been more than satisfied by the way in which he was treated by staff. He asked that the Commission consider approval of the zone change. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Jones stated this area, in her opinion, would be a good area for professional offices. She indicated she has talked to a few people living in the area who seem to be in favor of such a development. There being no further comments, a MOTION was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-18 subject to the findings and conditions as listed therein. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE JONES, DAHL, GARCIA, REMPEL * ~ PUBLIC HEARING Variance No. 78-01 - A request to vary from the requirement of a 70' wide corner lot to 60' for property located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Comet - R-1 zone - Request submitted by Merle Bauer. Michael Vairin, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported this Variance request is a unique circumstance because of the placement of the existing dwelling and that the immediate area is developed at similar densities, Staff feels that the neces- • ~ • ~•sPlanning Commission P~tes -3- • October.25, 1978 . ,. sary findings can be made if the conditions as listed in the Resolution are adopted. He recommended approval of Resolution No. 78-24 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Merle Bauer, applicant, stated he has nothing more to add to the report given by staff. He requested that the Commission consider approval of the Variance. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Jones stated with access onto Comet Street rather than Arrow, she would see no problem with this request. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-24 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. AYES: COMMISSIONERS DAHL, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * * ~ ~ TOLSTOY, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL Chairman Rempel stated the General Plan public hearing will be heard after the remaining Agenda items. * ~ ~ * ~ NEW BUSINESS Director Review No. 78-21 - The development of a retail hardware and wholesale lumber store to be located on the south side of Foothill Blvd. just west of Rochester Avenue - C-2 and M-1 zones - Request submitted by Richard DeWitt. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He stated the site development plan as proposed is in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and the proposed General Plan. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, and landscaped areas. Street improvements, widening and dedication, will be ob- tained according to the Master Plan of Highways for Foothill Blvd. Staff recom- mends that the Planning Commission approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-22 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the Staff. Commissioner Garcia asked Staff to elaborate on the nursery sales area that will be facing Foothill Blvd. Jack Lam stated the site is sloped. down in this area and with the inclusion of the landscaped berm for proper flood protection and the 25' setback, it is very unlikely that anyone would view that particular area. Storage material can not be maintained in the nursery area. .~ ',.,"' Planning Commission ~tes -4- ~ctober 25, 1978 Mr. Steve Perryman, representing Mr. DeWitt, stated regarding the nursery sales, it will be an open area with a fence around it. He stated the applicant is questioning condition number 15 in the Resolution which stated that the roof facade be carried around the entire east elevation of the front building. The driveway to the east of the building is a service driveway for loading and unloading trucks only. If the roof is carried around into this area it might cause a• problem to the trucks. They have carried the roof overhang 25' back from the corner of the building for the area visible from the street. Commissioner Garcia stated the Commission is very concerned about the type of structures to be constructed along Foothill Blvd. At the present time, we do not know what will be developed to the east of this property and his opinion is that as much that can be done to enhance the structure should be done, as he would not like to set a bad precedent for any development along Foothill in the future. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the plan supplied to us does not show the character of the sales area for the nursery. Is there .to be a structure in this area? How do they plan to display? Mr. Perryman stated at the time the plans were submitted, the nursery was going to be done in the future. The nursery will be in an outside area with a low fence and there may be a sales counter. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to see abetter plot plan of what is proposed for this area. Mr. Perryman stated they would like to go ahead with the development of the retail hardware and wholesale lumber store as soon as possible. He stated if the Commission desires they could develop the nursery sales in the future and at the time they develop they will come back to the Commission for review. Commissioner Garcia asked Mr. Perryman if they would landscape this area in the meantime. Mr. Perryman stated yes, this area would be landscaped. Chairman Rempel stated the Commission has been quite concerned that proper buffering is developed between the industrial to the south and what would be developed on the north side of Foothill. Cotmnissioner Garcia stated he is not receptive to a chain link fence and would like to see something else. A chain link fence does not give the appearance we are looking for. He asked that the applicant reconsider the chain link fence. Chairman Rempel stated there should be no development in the front 100' at this time except for landscaping. At such time as the applicant wishes to develop this area, development plans will be required for review and approval. • Planning Commission ~Ztes -5- ~ctober 25, 1978 Jack Lam stated an alternative would be to adopt the Resolution with an addi- tional condition that any area within 100' must have a development plan sub- mitted for approval prior to development. In the meantime, if no development is proposed, the area should be landscaped. He stated an additional Engineering condition should also be added as follows: An encroachment permit shall be . obtained from Cal-Trans prior to doing any work in the right of way. Chairman Rempel asked if the 6' high gate could be moved back to the building. Mr. Perryman stated yes, that could be moved back to the building. Joe DeIorio asked if it is correct that the customer traffic comes in and out of the same entrance onto Foothill Blvd. and there is one additional service entrance. It appears there is no other access on any other roads then Foothill. He stated the industrial committee is concerned with circulation and they would want to insure that there is proper view out onto the street so that people will not have to make a wide turn out on to Foothill as this is a fairly high speed area. Mr. Perryman asked if the Commission has made a decision as to the roof overhang. Commissioner Garcia stated we have expressed our concerns. He personally feels the staff recommendation should be supported at this particular point. He does not want to set a precedent for future development. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated in regard to Mr. DeIorio's comment, the driveway for this development will be widened. Traffic in that area at this .time is not as great as in more congested areas closer to the City. As traffic increases probably development will also increase which will slow traffic down; and possibly signals will be installed at Rochester in the future. As far as site distance, this will be reviewed to insure clear site distance a long way in each direction. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-22 subject to the findings and conditions as listed and subject to the following additions: 1. That any area within 100' of the front property line must have a development plan submitted for approval prior to development. In the meantime, if no development is proposed, the area should be landscaped. 2. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from Cal-Trans prior to doing any work in the right of way. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, JONES, DAHL, REMPEL NOES: TOLSTOY ABSENT: NONE Commnissioner Tolstoy stated he has nothing against this project; however, he objects to the plot plan. He doesn't think it has been planned well enough for him to make a decision. * ~ * * ~ Planning Commission min~s -6- ~ctober 25, 1978 i NEW BUSINESS Director Review No. 78-24 - Request to develop an air conditioning repair and storage facility in an M-1 zone on property generally located on the east side of Layton Street, south of LaMesa Drive and adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad - Request submitted by Ruben T. Luna. Michael Vairin, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan envisions commercial uses on the site. An air conditioner storage and repair facility would be allowable in a C-2 zone. Staff feels that the use would not create a significant impact to the area in that no manufacturing would take place on the site. Staff recommends approval and adoption of Resolution No. 78-21 based on the findings and conditions contained therein. Chairman Repel asked for questions 'from the Commission to the staff. Chairman Rempel stated in the report, Staff recommended that 3 1/2" A.C. paving be provided for the drive and parking areas on the site to replace the proposed slag. He stated this is considerably more than normally required. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated that is correct. This should be changed to 2 1/2" A.C. paving. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. Mr. Luna, applicant, stated there that the City consider abandoning He and his neighbor would perhaps neighbor to the south could still they will have one tenant. After come in as there is a lot of one would be allowed in the future. is no traffic on Layton Street and he asked that street and that a knuckle be installed. agree to pave this to keep dust down. The have use of it. He stated at the present time five years, maybe someone else might want to nan businesses. He asked if additional tenants Lloyd Hubbs, stated in regard to the abandonment of Layton Street, that is a 40' dedicated right of way at this time. It would require the vacation of that right of way. This would require public hearings, and the approval of all property owners that abut that street. The reason the Engineering Division has recom- mended continuation of the street is that'at will provide public access to the area. Too often private easements create more problems than they solve. There is a potential of Bennett Industries, located to the south of this street, bringing trucks up this road and causing a continuous maintenance problem. If the street is reasonably improved, the City would have to maintain it. It would eliminate con- flict of access. Jack Lam stated in regard to Mr. Luna's request of additional tenants in the future, the problem with this request is that the ordinance requires a certain amount of parking on the site. He would have to meet these parking requirements. Chairman Rempel stated since this building is leased for five years to one tenant, if Mr. Luna knows at some future date that another tenant is interested, Mr. Luna could then come back for review at that time. ."`Planning Commission Mi• es -7- ~tober 25, 1978 Commissioner Jones stated she would like to see a nice project for this area. There are many developments in the area that have not been maintained. She would hope that Mr. Luna will put a development in which will improve the area. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-21 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. AYES: COMMISSIONER GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, RIIIPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to comment that Commissioner Jones statement about the fact that this development could upgrade the area should be taken into consideration by Mr. Luna. This is a very good opportunity to set a good example for future development in the area. * ~ * ~ NEW BUSINESS Director Review No. 78-33 - Request for the addition of an Industrial Food Factory and Warehouse to the existing Frito Lay Elant in an M-2 zone generally located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. Request submitted by Frito Lay, Inc. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the factory will be used for new processing and packaging and the storage building will be for finished products. The project also includes a detached truck repair facility and a new waste processor. The Frito Lay Plant faces onto Archibald Avenue which is desig- nated as a special boulevard on the proposed General Plan; therefore, special land- scaping treatment is desirable at this location. Staff is recommending the sub- mission of a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for the proposed and existing lawn areas fronting Archibald prior to the issuance of building permits. He recom- mended approval and adoption of Resolution No. 78-16 based on the findings and conditions contained therein. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Mr. Arthur Parr, representing Frito Lay, stated they are in agreement with the Staff Report as presented. Commissioner Dahl asked if the new drive on Archibald Avenue is going to be a one c,ay entrance only. Mr. Parr stated this drive will be for ingress as well as egress. Commissioner Garcia asked if the applicant has considered some landscaped buffering regarding the area for parking of the trucks in the southern portion of the property. Mr. Parr stated at this time, they have no plans on development to the southern portion of the property with landscaping or any other proposal at this time. However, if the Commission made a requirement for .this landscaping, they would comply. 'Planning Commission M~ces -8- ! 0ctober.25, 1978 Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree with Commissioner Garcia that a condi- tion for landscaping on the southern portion of the property be required. Chairman Rempel stated until such time as the area south of the driveway is improved, he would also like to see landscaping. There being no further discussion, a MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-16 based on the findings and conditions as listed therein, with the added condition to state as follows: That the south portion of the development be provided with an adequate landscaped strip. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * ~ * ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL Director Review No. 78-34 - The development of a professional office building to be located on the south side of Baseline Avenue between Garnet and Beryl Avenue - R-1 zone (A-P pending) - Request submitted by Coral Investment, Inc. Michael Vairin, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the site development plan as proposed by the applicant is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the proposed General Plan. The Environmental Analysis Staff reviewed the project and has found no significant adverse eirvironmental impacts as a result of this project. Therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the newspaper. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-20 based on the conditions and findings listed therein. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Chairman Rempel asked if the first group of parking spaces behind the building will be accessible for parking. Michael Vairin stated it will probably be very difficult to make the turning radius. Chairman Rempel stated he feels it would be better to put a landscape island in this location as it is really inaccessible as a parking space. Mr. Joe Panaseti, applicant, stated parking spaces such as this are usually utilized by employees that come to work early. They do have 6 of 7 more parking spaces then required. Chairman Rempel stated an island would probably give a little better accessibility into the area. He stated he is not adding this as a condition but asked that the applicant consider it from a practical standpoint. .~ planning Commission Minutes -9- ~ctober.25, 1978 Michael Vairin stated he would like to add a condition: as there is a poten- tial for residential development on the south side of the property: That approximately six tree planter wells be installed along the south property line. Mr. Panaseti stated they would be agreeable to this added condition. He stated he would like to indicate in regard to Engineering Division recommenda- tion number 1 which states an offer of dedication consisting of 30 feet will be required along Baseline Avenue, this dedication has already been made on Parcel Map No. 4345. Mr. Walker, owner of property directly across the street from this property, stated he objects to this development. He objects to the spot zoning which is taking place as most of the property adjacent to this development is zoned R-1. Also, with the high school near this area, there is already too much traffic and this development will not help that situation. Commissioner Garcia stated in regard to the traffic problem, we are facing this problem throughout all our collector streets. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia seconded by Commissioner Tolstov and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. 78-20 based on the conditions and findings as listed in the Resolution. A MOTION was then made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstov and unanimously carried to amend the motion by adding the following condition: That approximately six tree planter wells be installed along the south property line. AYES: COMMISSIONERS DAHL, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ * ~ TOLSTOY, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL Chairman Rempel called a recess at 8:45 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m, i ~ * * * ~ NEW BUSINESS Director Review No. 78-36 - Construction of a 19,200 square foot industrial building located.on the northwest corner of Feron and Industrial Lane - M-R zone - Request submitted by S. "Buster" Filpi. Michael Vairin Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the site as indicated on the development plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. Improvements will be required that will properly relate to existing and proposed streets. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-23 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. ' ". Planning Commission M~tes -10- October 25, 1978 Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Garcia asked if Staff is recommending Exhibit "B" as a condition of approval. Jack Lam stated staff has offered Exhibit "B" as a possible solution to the proposed building location which will provide the landscaping along the street frontages and additional parking to comply with the parking requirements of the Ordinance. Michael Vairin stated this condition does appear as a condition in the Resolu- tion; however, if the applicant has another alternative this condition could be amended. Mr. Filpi, applicant, stated he was very upset after receiving the Staff Report for this development. The City is telling him that he will have to set the building back 55' from the street and he does not understand the reason for this. He stated the Engineering Division is requiring full street improvements along the frontage of the subject property at the time of construction of this building, and are requiring that the full street improvements be installed along Industrial Lane within 5 years of the date of this approval or when additional buildings are developed within this complex. He stated he is more than happy to give the City the street as it is now, without any improvement. The street has been like this for years. He has a tenant waiting for this building and they have been very patient. The existing buildings are all in line with each other and he can not understand the recommendation that the new building be built further back and not in line with the others. He wants this building to be like the rest of them already developed. Michael Vairin stated that Exhibit "B" was merely an alternative to help provide the applicant with additional landscaping and parking. If parking can be provided in some other manner, this condition can be amended. Commissioner Dahl asked Mr. Filpi if he has another alternative to the parking problem. Mr. Filpi stated they are only 4 parking spaces short of the required parking. Any additional parking the Commission desires can be provided in the back portion. Commissioner Garcia asked Mr. Filpi if he would be receptive to restudy the landscaping portion of the south portion of the building facing Feron. Mr. Filpi stated yes, he would be very happy to do whatever the Commission desires for the landscaping of this area. Feron Street is a new street and he would be very happy to do what the Commission desires. Commissioner Garcia asked the City Engineer to elaborate on Engineering Division recommendation lk4 regarding the completion of Industrial Lane within a five year period. ., ' 'Planning Commission ..utes -11- ~ October 25, 1978 Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated Staff wants to work with the applicant in every way possible so that there will be no hardship placed on him. The Engineering Division is very concerned with Industrial Lane being developed as a conventional city street and developed to city standards. There is considerable industrial development currently in the area and the character has changed from an individual ownership industrial complex into more of a public access type of development. As development occurs, Industrial Lane will become more of a public street requiring normal public improvements. Mr. Filpi stated this is a private road at the present time and he doesn't feel it would have to be made a public street. Commissioner Garcia stated this is an unusual case as the street does not belong to the City now. Commissioner Dahl asked how many Goodyear employees are using this road. Mr. Filpi stated there are approximately 50 to 75 people employed at that plant. Mr. Jeff Scerenka, Lucas Development, stated Mr. Filpi has already given something to the City and is bringing in more industry. He feels since Mr. Filpi has agreed to develop Feron to an acceptable standard, the City should accept that. One man should not have to pay for the entire dedication and cost for the street. Lloyd Hubbs stated if the City wants to improve Industrial Lane with the cost by the City, there are two options available which are through gas tax general fund money, or through an assessment district. Commissioner Garcia asked how vital the City Engineer feels improvement of Industrial Lane should be completed within the next five years. Lloyd Hubbs stated under increased traffic likely to be coming in from the Goodyear Plant, that road will start breaking up within two years and require new surfacing. Commissioner Jones asked why this street can not be left a private street. Lloyd Hubbs stated this street will provide continuity as Feron goes through and will pass through industrial development in the area. Industrial Lane is designed as a water carrying street to handle drainage problems. His opinion is that if Industrial Lane is not developed it will be a burden to the tax payers. Commissioner Garcia stated this is a private non-dedicated street now and based on the costs involved in terms of improving this street, it is really difficult to justify at this time. ~~ Planning Commission P~tes -12- ~tober 25, 1978 A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-23 based on the findings and conditions listed with the following changes: 1., Add a condition as follows: The south portion of the proposed building be totally landscaped and additional parking be provided to comply with parking requirements under present ordinance. 2. The intersection where Feron and Industrial Lane would join shall have proper engineering tie-ins for a future street and proper street improve- ments consistent with City standards be placed along the building frontages. 3. Delete Engineering Division recommendation 1F4. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * ~ ~ ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS JONES, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL Director Review No. 78-37 - Request to develop an industrial building in an M-2 zone generally located on the north side of Jersey Avenue one half mile east of Haven Avenue. Request submitted by Crowell/Leventhal, Inc. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the proposed use is in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and compatible with the proposed General Plan which designates this site as major indus- trial. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 78-17 based on the findings and conditions contained therein. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. Mr. Jim Crowell stated they are in agreement with Staff recommendations. Their only comment is about the block wall and the chain link gates with wood slats between. The intention of the buyer is to have wood slats across the entire structure. They feel wood slats would be more appropriate. Commissioner.Garcia stated he'personally does not like chain link fences and slats. They do not last long and in the long run a block wall is more appropriate. Mr. Crowell asked if the Commission would be receptive instead of a block wall if the developer could bring back some type of fence design for staff review. There is a possibility the developer would like to have a block wall with a stucco face on it. Commissioner Garcia stated this could perhaps be worked out with staff prior to the issuance of building permits. He would not see any problem with this. Planning Commission ~utes -13- ~tober 25, 1978 Jack Lam stated Staff would concur. If the Commission desires, the condition should be worded to state the wall to be developed subject to approval of the Planning Division. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-17 based on the findings and conditions as listed with the following amendment to Condition li4 to read as follows: Treatment of the buffering subject to Planning Staff approval. AYES: C~4fISSIONER GARCIA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS DAHL, JONES, TOLSTOY, REMPEL Parcel Map No. 4744 - 12.5 acres of land located at 7789 Sierra Vista into two parcels - R-1-12,000 zone - Map submitted by K & B Development Company. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the subject property is proposed to be divided in a manner consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. The map as proposed meets the standards of the State Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The Map as submitted does not vio- late the City residential moratorium as there is only one buildable lot being created as a result of this Parcel Map. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 78-19 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. Mr. Bates, applicant, stated he is in favor of the staff report as presented. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-19 based on the findings and conditions listed therein. AYES: COMM NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * ~ ~ ~ ~ COMMUNICATIONS JONES, GARCIA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL Modifications to a proposed neighborhood shopping center located on the southeast corner of Carnelian and 19th Street - Request submitted by T & S Development. Jack Lam reviewed a letter received from T & S Development Company and stated a representative is present and may wish to speak regarding this request. ' Planning Commission ~utes -14- • October 25, 1978 Mr. Ed Oremen, representing T & S Development Company stated they have worked on this center with the County and now the City for a little over a year. In developing the design for these shop buildings, they have made certain changes from the originally approved design as follows: 1. Delete 45 degree corners and wrap file canopy around corners. 2. Change plan configuration of Building "G" so that southerly half of east wall is moved 25 feet west, increasing separation between this wall and boundary of adjoining residential property. 3. Change main exterior walls from wood stud and stucco to colored concrete block and slump block. 4. Delete file roof on east side of Building "G". Mr. Oremen indicated their reasons for each of the above changes and asked that the Commission consider approval of them as submitted. Commissioner Garcia stated he doesn't feel the changes mentioned would cause any problems and he would be in favor of them as submitted. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to approve the changes as proposed above. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, JONES, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * * ~ ~ ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 10:30 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 10:45 p.m. ~ ~ * ~ ~ GENERAL 'PLAN HEARING Jack Lam stated the Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee has been talking about a number of issues, one was the proper planning for certain given industrial areas in the City and future marketability within these areas. This committee has discussed the possibility of developing a scope of work which can be submitted to the Planning Consultant for the development of a specific plan package relating to industrial development standards to include landscaping, access design standards, etc., depending on areas in question. The Industrial Committee, since the City can not fund such a specific plan study in the industrial areas and since the specific plan can benefit overall marketing for the properties that the private individual proposes to provide private financing for such a study. The City would select the consultant and the private funds would pay for the cost of such a study. Planning Commission hutes -15- • October 25, 1978 Mr. Paul Mindrum, Chairman of the Industrial Committee, stated they have been working on this program proposal for presentation to the Commission. Unless the Commission has any further questions he would have nothing more to add at this time. Commissioner Garcia asked what is the basic concept of Zone A, B and C in pro- posing these type of study areas. How is this particular concept more advantageous than the conventional method of zoning the industrial areas? Mr. Mindrum stated these zones were primarily designated because these indicate various stages of development. Each zone would have different problems or different areas of problems of development to be concerned with. Jeff Sceranka stated the motivation for adopting a specific plan rather than accepting classifications of major impact and minor impact was that it would take specific solutions for the three areas of concern. Resources would then be available to make a decision about zoning for the areas that would meet the needs of the industrial developer. If the studies can be done through working together with the City, Consultant, and the Industrial Committee, it is felt that we could come up with a fantastic industrial area within the City. Commissioner Garcia asked what time frame the committee is looking at. Jeff Sceranka stated the Committee would like to meet as soon as possible. Jack Lam stated the Committee has been working diligently over the last three months on putting together a specific plan program. We don't have a proposal for a specific plan at this time although there is a lot of interest and support for doing this. The City would be very happy to work with the Committee in developing a specific plan. Commissioner Garcia stated his concern is that if we deviate from the basic approach of planning, if we eliminate the classifications of industrial areas in terms of medium, heavy and light industry, provisions should be made within the policies of the general plan to indicate Study areas A, B and C. He does not think it is a wise move to strictly address ourselves to industry zoning. Jack Lam stated he would like to suggest that the major and minimum impact designations remain at this time but the text be changed to recognize specific planning. Chairman Rempel stated in the text something should be written to the effect that each industry coming in would have to indicate the impact on adjoining areas. Commissioner Garcia stated assuming the General Plan is adopted, he would like to see industrial classifications assigned to~the entire area but sub- classified with the study areas and the text should indicate the basic concept of what the study area should accomplish. Planning Commission •utes -16- .ctober 25, 1978 Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the Planning Commnission will select the Consul- tant for this project. Joe DeIorio of the Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee, stated the Com- mittee has di6cussed various planning consultants, and their general opinion is that unless the City felt strongly against it, John Blayney would do this study. The Industrial Committee is not trying to influence the choice of the consultant. After further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried that language in the land use element should recognize the Chamber Industrial Committee's efforts and encourage specific planning for City industrial areas. Further, that Study Areas A, B and C as indicated by the Industrial Committee be :`delineated on~the General Plan. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ * ~ * ~ PUBLIC HEARING General Plan - Industrial Issues Area - Lewis Property north of Foothill, east of Haven Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Plan- ning Division. He reported the principal Lewis objection to the land use element is residential land use designations north of Foothill. Since the Lewis land holdings are large, more specific laa4duse planning can be achieved with a specific plan which can address development issues at a more critical level and more precise design control. If a time frame and specific proposal can be offered, Staff would support a "study area" description under each alternate regional site to recognize private efforts to achieve specific planning, but the General..E~an designations should remain until a specific plan can be accomplished. He recommended that the General Plan designation be retained until a specific plan is submitted. Ralph Lewis of Lewis Homes, stated they own property on the north side of Foothill between Haven and Rochester. The Commission and the Consultant have proposed it with respect to a regional center alternative. They have no objection to showing 3 alternatives but each of the alternatives should be changed where low density residential is not shown along Foothill Blvd. It is not consistent with the proposed plan or good planning. It is not good to put residential on a major thoroughfare. Mr. John Shurb of Lewis Homes reviewed the slides of how Foothill could be developed for the Commission. Commissioner Garcia asked if Mr. Lewis is requesting mixed commercial uses along Foothill Blvd. in this location. ,~ 'Planning Commission Mutes -17- ~ October 25, 1978 Mr. Lewis stated they are requesting service commercial or mixed use. The plan at the present time indicates low density residential. Commissioner Dahl stated he would agree with Mr. Lewis that low density resi- dential development should not be allowed on Foothill Blvd. He would not like to live along a major thoroughfare such as Foothill. Ralph Lewis stated on Baseline, east of Haven, they would like to develop a mobile home park in that area. Right now there is no designation on the General Plan for a mobile home park. They would like to develop a mobile home park from Baseline to the railroad tracks. They are willing to submit a plan for this area to include the necessary traffic studies, etc. Jack Lam stated in regard to the area requested fora mobile home park, he would suggest that the Commission maintain the concept in the General Plan and allow the flexibility in the text for the Commission to recognize other land uses that may be appropriate given proper controls. Commissioner Garcia stated he would go along with the recommendation of staff. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to suggest that a Study Area be indi- cated along Foothill including Mr. Lewis' property. Any plans should include the study of the specific area as well as .the area immediately surrounding it. Jack Lam stated if the General Plan designation is retained until a specific plan is submitted for the area, this would encourage alternative uses which may be appropriate for the area in the future. A MOTION was made by Co~mnissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried to retain the General Plan designation with a statement in the test under each alternative indicating these are study areas and the Commission would encourage specific plans to explore the possibility of alter- native land uses. AYES: COMMISSIONERS DAHL, GARCIA, JONES, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ * ~ ~ Area: East side of Sycamore Inn below Redhill Country Club and north of Foothill Blvd. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the general plan indicates high density residential and the property owner desires commercial designation. He stated in reviewing this area, the site in question lacks adequate depth for proper placement of multi- family development. Access to the site is also very critical since any addi- tional access off of Foothill is very dangerous and highly impractical given the nature of Foothill Blvd. It is conveivable that some type of low trip generating use can be developed on the site. Access would have to be carefully controlled and ideally, a joint access with Sycamore Inn should be developed. He recom- mended a continuation of service commercial for this area. • •Planning Commission~nutes -18- ~ October 25, 1978 Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree that high density residential would not be appropriate for this area. Commissioner Garcia stated the Staff recommendation to continue service commercial should be implemented in the general plan. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to change the General Plan designation from high density residential to service commercial for subject property. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Area: Southwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Plan- ning Division. He reported the general plan designates.-this area as an alternate park site. The property owner desires clarification of a proper base land use designation. The Commission has discussed numerous times the issue of park location and alternate sites. This area represents one of the few areas where a park may be developed. He stated residential development on a site of this small scale is not appropriate.given this location in relation- ship to secondary streets and its relationship to the minimum impact industrial. The Planning Consultant concurs and recommends that the base designation should be a continuation of mixed use. He recommended that the Commission delete low density residential and replace with mixed use. Mr. Charles Phister, owner of property, stated the property to the east is the Otis Elevator property which is a major industrial development. They purchased this property for industrial use. He asked that the Commission consider indus- trial for this area. Jack Lam stated our motive for showing mixed use for this land is that it is felt there is much industrial property already in the area. He feels mixed use would be compatible in the area. Commissioner Garcia stated he feels the recommendation of staff is more appro- priate than industrial for this property. Commissioner Dahl stated under the Chambers specific plan proposal for the industrial area submitted earlier this evening, this area is shown under Zone A, industrial. Jeff Sceranka, Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee, stated the purpose of segregating the Zone A as a Study Area does not say the whole area should be classified industrial. Commissioner Garcia asked the property owner what type of industrial development he is proposing. .-, ~' 'Planning Commission~utes -19- • October 25, 1978 Mr. Phister owner and operator of CP Construction, stated they originally purchased this property for the purpose of moving their construction company to this location. Couunissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree that perhaps the owner of this property has a valid point and that industrial should be considered. Chairman Rempel stated he would agree that getting some type of office com- plex there at this time is pretty remote. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to urge the Commission to consider industrial. This is a small piece of land and with the channel as a buffer to the back he would not see any problem with industrial designation. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, and unanimously carried to change the general plan designation for subject property to minimum impact industrial. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~ ~ ~ * ~ Area: Wholesale Lumber, Ind. - Rochester Avenue Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designates low density residential and the property owner opposes this designation. He stated that there is an existing lumber sales yard on the site with vacant land surrounding it. The site is basically isolated. He stated a nonconforming use can be continued provided the City does not adopt an amortization schedule and the use does not expand. He recommended that the General Plan designation of low density residential be retained. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Wayne Soles, half owner of the property and. part owner of the business, stated they purchased this land as industrial two years ago. They have invested much money in their development. He stated if they decide to sell this property in five or ten years they will not be able to do this. Commissioner Tolstoy stated this is not correct. That piece of property when sold could remain in its present use. However, this use can not be expanded in the future. Bob Dougherty, City Attorney, stated it is correct that this use could not be expanded in the future. The use could continue as non-conforming use as long as no amortization period is set. The use could continue indefinitely regard- less of the ownership. .,- -Planning Commissionnutes -20- .ctober 25, 1978 Mr. Soles stated they will not be able to add any more buildings or make any further improvements to the site. This development is not presently the size they want and in the future they would like to expand. This could put them out of business eventually. This will present a financial burden to them in the long run. Commissioner Garcia stated he feels the recommendation made by staff is appro- priate. We are here to address properties in basic terms of planning on behalf of the co~mnunity. Chairman Rempel stated he would also be in favor of the staff recommendation. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Chairman Rempel and unanimously carried to recommend that the low density residential designation on the General Plan be designated for subject property. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, REMPEL, JONES NOES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, DAHL ABSENT: NONE ~ * ~ * ~ Area: Area bounded by Vineyard, 8th Street, Cucamonga Wash and the City limit line. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designates this area for low density residential. The property owner desires industrial. He stated it is generally recognized that residential uses adjacent to industry generally cause incom- patibility that often results in conflicts that are detrimental to industry as well as residential uses. That is why industry near residential uses generally desire a division with a right of way as a minimum buffer between the two land uses. This area ie directly adjacent to an area of predominately residential uses. The site should logically be the continuation of existing land uses on the Ontario side of the City limits and intrusion of industrial land uses into a residential area is undesirable and should not be fostered. He recommended that the low density residential designation be retained on the General Plah. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Arthur Warren, owner of this property, stated they acquired this property the first of the year and the property was zoned manufacturing. They have spent a considerable amount of money in developing their plans. Commissioner Garcia asked what is located in the City of Ontario adjacent to this property. Jack Lam stated this property would back right into residential development in the City of Ontario. Mr. Warren stated they are willing to create a landscape buffer between their development and the residential adjoining them. ;,, ~" Planning Commission~inutes -21- ~ October 25, 1978 Mr. Jeff Sceranka stated his opinion is that there is no way that residen- tial use would be compatible on that corner. Commissioner Garcia stated it would seem to him if this piece of property is retained on the General Plan there would be another problem of buffering the residential property from the railroad tracks. Industry in this area would conform with that area. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried to change the General Plan for subject area to industrial. AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE * ~ ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT TOLSTOY, DAHL, GARCIA, JONES, REMPEL Upon MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of October 25, 1978 at 2:00 a.m. to a Special Meeting on October 31, 1978 in the Library Conference Room to discuss Growth Management. Respectfully ubmitted, _~ JACK LAM, Director of -- Community Development ,a . , -~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 19, 1978 Special Meeting CALL TO ORDER ~_ The special meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Thursday, October 19, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Chairman Rempel who led the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ~ * ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners: Jorge Garcia, Herman Rempel and Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: Commissioners: Laura Jones and Richard Dahl ~ ~ * ~ ~ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, stated a letter has been received from the City/County Planning Commission indicating a conference will be held at Norton Air Force Base Officers Club on October 28th. He stated the Commission is invited to attend and asked that reservations be made by October 23, 1978. ~ * ~ ~ ~ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, stated a communication has been received from the Planning Commissioners Association. Every year Planning Com- missioners from various cities get together to conduct a Commissioners Conference. This year the conference is scheduled for November 9 and November 10, 1978. He asked that the Commission contact him as soon as possible on whether or not they will be able to attend this conference. He indicated an Agenda will be forwarded to them in the near future on this conference. * ~ ~ Chairman Rempel asked that Staff Communication, Item 7A on the Agenda, be reviewed at this time. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam reviewed a letter from James L. Catanzaro, Superintendent/President from Chaffey College.request~ing that the college be given the opportunity to present ":Panning Commission Minut~ -2- ~ October 19, 1978 their proposal and back-up information regarding the general plan designations for the area east, west and south of the campus to the Planning Commission at the October 25 meeting. Jack Lam stated the October 25 meeting is the date set to review indus- trial portions of the general plan, as well as any commercial issues that have come in the last week. Chairman Rempel stated he feels the October 25, 1978 meeting will be a fairly heavy meeting and suggested that this matter be reviewed at the November 8, 1978 meeting. He further asked that a position statement and any supportive information be for- warded to the Commission by Chaffey College prior to the Novanber, 1978 meeting, in order that the Commission can understand their position and respond to it at that meeting. The Board of Trustees is invited to attend this meeting. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried that. Staff inform the College Board of Trustees to have a representative at the November 8, 1978 Planning Commission meeting and that proper information to substantiate their position should be forwarded to the Commission in .writing prior to November 1, 1978". ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING Site Approval No. 78-02 - Request for an Aluminum Recycling Plant in an M-2 zone generally located on the north side of Sixth Street between Archibald and Turner Avenue - Request submitted by Reynolds Aluminum. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported this was continued from the last meeting at which time the applicant was requested to submit noise level measurements of other similar recycling plants. The measurements were not received for review at the last meeting, thus the item was continued to this meeting. He further indicated the Commission expressed concern about the architectural treat- ment of the building. Staff was directed to work with the applicant to revise the exterior elevation plans so as to allow for a more aesthetically pleasing building. He stated the applicant has agreed to use attenuation techniques so as to reduce the noise level at any property line below 65 dbA. The applicant has agreed to revise the exterior elevation plans of the building and they propose to replace the chain link fence in the front of the property with a decorative block wall. He reported the Planning Division recommends approval of Resolution No. 78-12 based on the findings and conditions contained therein. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he feels a condition should be added to the Resolution which states the noise level at any property line shall not exceed 65dbA. Jack Lam stated this condition should be made a part of the Resolution as Item number 27. There being no further questions from the Commission to the Staff, Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. There being no comments from the applicant, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-12 subject to the findings and conditions as listed with the addition of Item number 27 Planning Commission Minui~ -3- • October 19, 1978 which states: The noise level at any property line shall not exceed 65 dbA. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS DAHL, JONES * ~ ~ Chairman Rempel stated the General Plan discussions (Item 4B) should be continued until after review of the remaining Agenda items. ~ ~ ~ * ~ OLD BUSINESS Modification of Tract Conditions for Regency Equestrian Estates - Tracts_ 9378-79 Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, stated at the October 11, 1978 meeting, the Commission continued review of the request for modification of wall requirements on these tracts. This was continued to October 25, 1978. The applicant, however, is experiencing some time problems and has additional information for review at this meeting. He is therefore requesting that the Commission consider the new information at this time. Jack Lam stated the Commission continued this item for two reasons: 1) It was requested that the rail fence as proposed be replaced with a concrete rail fence on both sides of the trail easement; and 2) There was a question as to proper irrigation of the trees that were preserved on the site. It was felt the property owner would have difficulty maintaining the trees. He stated the applicant is present and can speak to these issues. Mr. John Chavanne, representing Regency Equestrian Estates, stated they have looked at the landscaping maintenance situation and they have decided to put in a bubbler system for the trees that will be in the rear of lots 1 through 4. Those lots are visible from Hillside Drive. He stated each lot will have a slope planting. Sprinkler systems will be installed at the rear of each lot for the maintenance of the slope, so water will be available to the rear of all lots. They plan on installing a drip type irrigation system to maintain the trees on lots 1 through 4. This is a planned unit development and will have a home owners association which will collect dues for the maintenance of the fence. In looking at the concrete fence and in talking to some people who have horses, it was felt that a concrete fence could be very .dangerous and they would prefer a wood fence. If the wood fence is allowed, it will be maintained by the Home Owners Association. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Com- missioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to approve the modification of Tract con- ditions for Regency Equestrian Estates - Tracts 9378-79 subject to the following con- ditions: 1) That a bubbler system for the trees be provided in the rear of Lots 1 through 4 of the tract, and 2) that the split rail fence as proposed be approved subject to the condition that the CC6R's reflect that the Home Owners Association will be responsible for the maintenance of said split rail fence. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JONES, DAHL ~ * * ~ ~ ;Planning Commission Minu~ PUBLIC HEARING -4- • October 19, 1978 GENERAL PLAN - Certain Residential and Commercial designations will be discussed. Jack Lam stated according to the time frame, the Commission has this as the last formal meeting in which residential and commercial issues would be considered. The October 25, 1978 meeting is scheduled to consider industrial properties. However, there are some commercial issues still in our office and we feel we can add those to the meeting of the 25th; however, at that point formal discus- sions and individual issues should cease and the Commission should then begin looking at some conclusions and some final recommendations to the City Council in order that they can conduct their public hearings before the first of the year. * ~ * ~ ~ RES IDENTlAL Area: "Reserve Issue: A Number of property owners expressed concern regarding the meaning of "Reserve Area". Jack Lam reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the land use element designates this reserve area primarily because it is remote from urban services and need not be developed in the near future. It seems obvious that the land use will be residential but better environ- mental data is needed before any approvals are granted and there should be assurances that_there.,~ill be a large enough community built over a short time to support the cost of providing services to such development. In the interim only large parcels should be required. He stated it appears that most property owners are in general agreement that there are fiscal and environmental constraints to development in the area in the short term but they are concerned that "reserve area" somehow has a connotation that development can never occur on such property. Therefore, it is reasonable for the Commission to consider a "study area" designation instead of "reserve". He stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission delete the "reserve" area designations and replace the same with "study area". The text to be changed to indicate predominately lower density residential uses but that rapid urbanization of land within the area is to be discouraged until certain conditions can be met as stated.in the Staff Report. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Tolstoy stated it is his opinion that seismic study should be included as a part of Staff Recommendation No. 2. There being no further comments from the Commission, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Joe De0rial, 776 19th Street, stated the major land owners in this area seem to be in agreement with this "study area". Commissioner Garcia stated he does feel that a study must be done in that particular area, and he would like to encourage property owners in that particular area to do a study earlier than the three year time period if they can fund one. Zf a study is done in this area, he feels the entire area should be studied at one time and should not be done piecemeal. .Planning Commission Minu« -5- ~ October 19, 1978 Jack Lam stated in talking about areas outside our sphere of influence, the City would like to insure any development which occurs be consistent with city policies. LAFCO will not make a decision on the sphere of influence until after our General Plan is adopted. Commissioner Garcia stated if the land owners in this area decide to initiate a study in the next year or so, he would personally be receptive to such a study. Mr. John Shurb, 1998 Banyan, asked. if the Commission has any idea at this time of the ultimate density for this area. Chairman Rempel stated this can not be answered at this time until such time as a study can be done. Mrs. Betty McKay stated there aren't many people involved in this area. It is possible that the owners in this area could get a study going. Chairman Rempel stated if a study was started now and at such time there is something positive to present, the Commission and Staff would look at it. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried to accept staff recommendation to delete the reserve area designations and replace the same with "Study Area". The text .is to be changed to indicate predominately lower density residential uses but that rapid urbanization of land within the area is to be discouraged until: 1. A firm resolution of the LAFCO sphere of influence for the City and agreement with the County on development standards and densities, etc. on both sides of the city line. 2. Identification of environmental constraints and their mitigation or resolution; i.e., the resolution of flood control designs for this area and seismic safety, etc., should be established or determined. 3. The fiscal impacts of the city of development including the critical issues of timing and utility extensions need to be determined. 4. The completion of a city zoning ordinance and completion of the remaining General Plan elements. 5. The city will initiate a study and general plan amendment within three years from date of adoption of a zoning map or unless such a study and amendment can be made with property owners bearing the cost of such study prior to_the three year time period. Large parcel zoning should be required to discourage premature conversion to urban densities in the interim. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL ~ * ~ ~ ~ • Planning Commission Min -6- • October 19, 1978 Area: Area bounded by the Devore Freeway and East Avenue, south of Victoria Street in Etiwanda. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report, this being on file in the Planning Division. He stated the property owners disagree with the Windrow designation and desire high density. He recommended that the Windrow designation as shown on the General Plan be retained for this area. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to retain the Windrow designa- tion for this area. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL * * ~ * ~ Ralph Lewis stated they are the owners of property from Haven to Rochester up to Baseline and a small amount of property north of Baseline. On the original master plan for their property, they proposed a hundred acre mobile home park on the north side of Baseline, east of Haven to where Milliken extends up. He feels there is a need for a mobilehome park in the City. He asked that the Com- mission consider this type of use for that area. Commissioner Garcia stated it would be advisable for Mr. Lewis to submit his request in writing prior to our Agenda in order for the Commission to analyze the request. It was the concensus of the Commission that this item be brought back to the October 25, 1978 meeting for further review. *~,t~ COMMERCIAL ISSUES Area: Between the Southern Pacific Station and the Junior High School on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue Jack Lam reviewed the Staff Report this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designation for this area is Windrow. The property owner indicates there is an opportunity to create a commercial environment conducive to the creation of an historic village for the Etiwanda area and that such an opportunity should be recognized on the land use plan. Staff recommends that the Windrow desig- nation be retained until such time as a specific proposal whether on a project basis or on a plan basis be submitted for City consideration. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. • Planning Commission Min~s -7- ~ October 19, 1978 Mrs. McKay stated she is very much interested in a historical village in this area. She feels there is a need for commercial in this area. This is no place for homes. It is her opinion that this would be an ideal place for protecting the area to be able to bring in older houses and possibly convert them to a commercial use in order to preserve them in this small area. Commissioner Garcia stated the concept of commercial of some sort between school and railroad tracks perhaps should be studied. He stated he would agree with Staff that the present Windrow designation should be retained until such time as a specific proposal is submitted for city consideration. That would allow the applicant to come up with a proposal such as a historical village for this property for review. The City would then have some control as to what the facility will look like. A general commercial designation would give less con- trol over development in the area. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree with Commissioner Garcia. The his- torical village concept is a good idea, but he would not like to show a general commercial designation at this point in time. Chairman Rempel stated he understands there is a commercial use on the property at the present time, which would be allowed to continue. Jack Lam stated that is correct, it would be a legal non-conforming use and has every right to remain so long as the use is in continuous operation. There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to retain the Windrow designation until such time as a specific proposal whether on a project basis or on a plan basis be submitted for City consideration. AYES: C ~iMISSIONERS GARCZA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL Area: Northwest and southeast corner of 19th and Archibald Jack Lam reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designates this area as high density residential, and medium density residential. The property owher desires a com- mercial designation. He reported no projects have been approved for these two sites although withhold zone changes are pending on both parcels. Both property owners are currently in the process of developing a site plan for approval although no approvals have been given at this time. He stated there are sites within the City which developers have announced plans for future development. The Planning Commission has yet to make a firm statement regarding the issue of such neighbor- hood shopping centers whether more should be allowed to be constructed within the concentrated areas of Alta Loma. A withhold zone is not legal until the ordinance has been adopted and no vested rights in continuing development are present unless a building permit has been issued on a particular piece of property. The Commission should establish a firm policy as to the rejection or selection of multiple corner sites. He recommended if the Planning Commission rejects the sites, the General Plan designations should be retained. If the Planning Commission desires in some respect to recognize outstanding commercial center projects, criteria should be determined so that a selection may be made. Planning Commission Min~s -8- ,ctober 19, 1978 Commissioner Garcia stated he would like a brief report from the City Engineer in terms of traffic conditions at that particular corner and the condition during peak hours in relationship to the shopping center to the south on Baseline and Archibald. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated a tremendous aruount of detail study has not been done on 19th Street as yet. He does have some traffic engineer counts. The traffic during the last year has increased quite a bit but a step by step study needs to be done. Chairman Rempel asked what the width design is for 19th Street. Llovd Hubbs stated the master plan width is 64 feet. Commmissioner Garcia stated he has a concern about traffic problems if shopping centers are located in this area especially during the rainy season. There being no further questions from the Commission to the staff, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Frank Dominguez, President of Vanir Development Company, stated he would like the Commission to consider changing the proposed master plan to commercial zoning on the northwest corner of Archibald and 19th Street. From amoral standpoint, they have been working on this project for two years now in an effort to develop a shopping center on this property. He stated a meeting was held with the Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino County prior to the City's incorporation at which time they were led to believe this development would not cause any problems. From the continents made at that board meeting, they proceeded to acquire the pro- perty on the northwest corner of 19th and Archibald for this commercial develop- ment and thus far they have expended several hundred thousands of dollars to plan and acquire property. They were told by San Bernardino County in a meeting, at which time members of the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga were present, that the withhold states if developers followed certain conditions, the Board has never turned down a request for extension of a zone change where an applicant shows diligence in a project. He stated he does not feel residen- tial development in this area would be conducive to good planning. They are working on a development which they feel will be an asset to the City and will do very well at this location. Mr. Doug Hone,,stated he is not associated in any way with this property at the present time. At one time he had this property in escrow and they did represent the property before the Board of Supervisors. This was not a joint meeting of the City Council and the Board of Supervisors, but prior to the incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. DeWavne Walkers, representing Lucky Stores and Gemco, stated they had a con- sultant report made up which states that their site is a very good one for Lucky Stores and would be a very profitable venture for Lucky's. It is generally felt that when other grocery stores are located within a community they are more com- petitive. The site has a natural barrier to the north if the Foothill Freeway goes through. Planning Commission Mies -9- • October 19, 1978 Mr. Ted Robinson, Robinson Development Company of Newport Beach, stated they are the developers of the southeast corner of Archibald and 19th Street. He stated they selected this location because they felt it was a little more removed from the proposed freeway and they wanted to avoid the on and off ramps of the freeway. It was pointed out by the City Engineer that east of the intersection there is a good drop off of traffic, so their particular center might have less of an impact on traffic along 19th Street. They too had their site plan reviewed by the County of San Bernardino and they were postponed until the outcome of the formation of the City. Mr. Frank Dominguez stated their project was reviewed by the County Planning Com- mission and they received unanimous approval. It then went forward to the Board of Supervisors. Mayor Jim Frost stated for the record, the only meeting the Board of Supervisors had with our City Council was Monday, November 21st. The Council members were sworn in on the second of December. Any information given would have been advisory only. Commissioner Garcia stated he does not like to implicate what action was carried on by the previous Board of Supervisors. This Commission as a planning body has been instructed to look at matters regarding planning. This Commission should look strictly at the project and its effect on the community as a whole. The City is facing a considerable amount of commercial development. He understands the compe- titive issues, but overbuilding commercial is not good either. Commercial develop- ments have to be competitive to population of the area. The issue the Commission must address ourselves to is do we have enough commercial now versus population growth. Our consultant has indicated we do have enough commercial at the present time. There is also tremendous traffic problems in this area. The City has not been able to study the traffic flows and the impact a shopping center within this area may have. He is very reluctant to increase the traffic unless proper justi- fication and constructive comments can be made for this area. Lloyd Hubbs stated there have been no traffic studies done on this intersection. Chairman Re<npel stated there is another problem the Commission has to address and that is whether the Commission wants to recommend to the Council that we have multiple corner shopping center areas or do we want to spread shopping centers out. We need to determine the traffic generated because of multiple corner developments and whether or not it is more than can be handled. We can not get into the economics of a development. Commissioner Garcia stated the General Plan Consultant has done enough studies in the area and their recommendstions at this point are valid based on experience that we have. He stated he is reluctant at this point to make any constructive comments to change the present master plan designation. Commissioner Tolstoy stated it has been pointed out by John Blayney, our consultant, that when shopping centers oppose each other across the street, they are not desirable. He is in agreement with the General Plan as proposed for this area. Mr. Donimguez stated he feels that multiple family residential would bring more traffic into the area overall, especially during peak periods. He feels this should be considered. ... Planning Commission M~tes -10- • October 19, 1978 Commissioner Garcia stated in terms of long range planning if it is found there is a need for such a use in the future, at that time there is flexibility to amend the General Plan. There is not proper justification at the present time to make a constructive decision. Chairman Rempel stated if shopping centers were approved in an area that does not really need them yet, this also causes the additional traffic congestion before the time that the City can handle it. He is not in favor of markets on different corners as it causes traffic problems that we are trying to avoid. For now, until a traffic study is done and solutions reached in the area, and better means of handling that traffic, he would not be in favor of changing the master plan designation. A motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to retain the proposed General Plan designation of high density residential and medium density residential for property on the northwest and southeast corner of 19th and Archibald. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL Chairman Rempel stated he would like to clarify that the Commission is not saying they will never be able to put a market on this property. What they are saying is in order to develop this area, same very good back up informa- tion is needed when someone comes in with a development. The fact that the County made some prior commitments does not mean that they were best for the City. We are sorry this had to happen but one of the reasons the City of Rancho Cucamonga incorporated is because of the fact it was felt we weren't getting what was best for the community. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Area: Southeast corner and Southwest corner of Foothill and Haven Jack Lam reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designates the area on the southwest corner for mixed use and the southeast corner industrial. The property owners want commercial center designations. The intersection of Foothill and Haven is a critical one since it is a juncture of two major arterials in the community. It is also a location for a regional shopping center alternative thereby making the intersection more critical in terms of access and efficiency flow of traffic. The consultant indicates that a site in any quadrant of the Foothill/Haven inter- section would be suitable if a regional shopping center site is not to be reserved in the northeast quadrant. Any development of shopping centers on,'corner sites other than the northeast corner should be on a "show me" basis with full traffic studies. He recommended that the General Plan designation be retained. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no coimnants from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. ., Planning Commission M~es -11- • October 19, 1978 Commissioner Tolstoy stated he is excited about the prospect of a regional shop- pic;g center in this location and he doesn't think this Commission should do any- thing that would change that as this is one of the focal points of the community. We should consider very strongly keeping the designation on the map until somebody comes in with a specific project. Commissioner Garcia stated he would agree with Commissioner Tolstoy. He would also like to make a policy on the General Plan that this area should be set aside for high sophisticated development with. that particular intersection. This area should be looked at as a whole and any development should be strictly related in terms of basic concept. Some sort of protection should be addressed on all four corners. Jack Lam stated any development proposed on these corners should also have a full traffic study and specific recommendations to mitigate any traffic problems at that intersection. Commissioner Garcia stated that is more reason for us to implement within our objectives that that particular corner, regardless of development, should be totally addressed in some specific manner. The area should be looked at as a whole and not in pieces. A motion was made by Crnmnissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to retain the proposed General Plan designation on all four corners and that our Director contact our General Plan Consultant to make proper policies addressing concerns of the Commission on the corner of Haven and Foot- hills AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL * ~ ~ ~ ~ Area: Southeast corner of Highland and Haven Jack Lam reported the General Plan designates this area as mixed use. The property owner desires commercial designation. The other residents don't want any commer- cial on any intersection. It is felt a commercial site should be moved as far from an interchange situation as possible to avoid traffic conflict. He recommended that the General Plan designation be retained but re-evaluate if any additional changes are made in the land use around Chaffey College and the area between Chaffey College and the Foothill Freeway. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the proposed Foothill Freeway would remove Highland Avenue in this area. City Engineer stated it would appear Highland Avenue would be a frontage road on the north side of the freeway. Mr. Milton Zugar stated he believes the frontage road is on the south side of the proposed freeway. It is designated by Cal-Trans for an off ramp and frontage road. He stated there are a group of people that own this property for over ten years. He stated the property for the most part would be developed residential. However, a portion of the property on Haven, they would like to consider as a .,. Planning Commission ~tes -12- • October 19, 1978 reasonable place for a neighborhood type shopping center as there would be a fairly large amount of residential population for this type of use. They feel Highland Avenue would be a natural boundary between the area around Chaffey College and what will be located below this area. He asked that the Commission consider another alternative site for the southeast portion of their property. Doug Hone stated he has half interest in the property at the southwest corner of Haven. At this point they are in favor of the master plan as designated at the present time. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to retain the proposed Mixed Use designation on the General Plan for this area. It was further moved that this could be re-evaluated if any additional changes are made in the land use around Chaffey College and the area between Chaffey College and the Foothill Freeway. AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: CQ~AfISSIONERS JONES, DAHL ~ * * * ~ Chairman Rempel called for a recess at 10:30 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 10:45 p.m. ~ * ~ ~ ~ Area: West side of Etiwanda Avenue north of Highland Avenue Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designation for this area indicated Windrow and the property owner desires neighborhood commercial center. He stated given the present concept of the Etiwanda Avenue area, the consultant has established alternative shopping center sites south of the proposed Foothill Freeway. Until other factors change, the General Plan designation should be retained. He recom- mended that the Commnission retain the Windrow designation. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Garcia stated he feels that the alternative site definition in relation to the content of what it actually means should be a little more defined so there is no misinterpretation. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no discussion from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to retain the Windrow designation for subject property. .. Planning Commission mutes -13- ~ctober 19, 1978 AYES: COMMISSIONERS TOLSTOY, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL ~ * ~ ~ Area: Area abounded by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracl~s, Archibald Avenue, and the rear portion of Alpha Beta Shopping Center Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported the General Plan designation is high density residential for this area. The property owner desires commercial. He stated since the site is situated between two commercial uses and the Southern Pacific tracks, it becomes questionable whether this environment can be conducive toward high density residential. Archibald and Baseline is a critical intersection and currently generates a great deal of traffic. This traffic would further increase with the construction of the "committed" shopping center on the southeast corner of Archibald and Baseline. It is therefore desirable that if the site is not conducive for residential use, lower traffic generation commercial uses be allowed thereby reducing the impact upon that portion of Archibald Avenue. He recommended that the general plan be modified with either those commercial designations or mixed use designation. Chairman Rempel stated if commercial zoning is designated, it could still be restrictive to the zoning. Jack Lam stated it should be entered into the record if this is the desire of the Commission, so that when the property is zoned, the appropriate zone dis- trict is shown. Otherwise this could be debatable at a later date. Chairman Rempel stated he can not see residential development in this area. Commissioner Garcia stated there is a tremendous need for professional uses within the community. In order to enhance the particular corner over and above commercial uses, he would be receptive to the idea that mixed use should be implemented not only on this corner but also the northeast portion of Archibald and Baseline. Chairman Rempel stated he didn't think offices located next to the retail lumber sale outlet on the south side of the Southern Pacific tracks would be compatible. He further stated he would rathei, see a designation of.,commercial where we can -. control with zoning what can be developed. Commissioner Garcia stated he would agree but there is no designation for this to insure control in the future. He does not feel this area should be shown commercial with no restrictions upon development. Jack Lam stated whether it is limited commercial or A-P, we still have to deal with the particular constraints with the design of the site. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to see this area limited commercial. Jack Lam stated it could be stated at the time zoning is developed, it should be zoned limited commercial on the site. _, Planning Commission ~tes -14- ,Jctober 19, 1978 Mr. Alan Wyrick stated this property is designated as community commercial by the County of San Bernardino. He asked that the General Plan show service commercial with a restriction on zoning that requires Commission approval for the site uses. They are planning to put a street down the middle so that developments going in could face a street. The first phase they are planning would be to put a private storage or mini storage facility to the rear of the property. He feels this type of use is needed in the City. It would be a low traffic generator. Walls would be developed around it and the front would be landscaped. They would then like to proceed with the office and perhaps a medical or dental office to the front of the property. Commissioner Garcia stated he isn't too sure about a storage facility in this area. This type of use should be developed in the industrial area. He stated aside from the storage facility, Mr. Wyrick is talking about a mixed use desig- nation. Mr. Dave Herford stated there are few uses practical for the rear portion of this property. He feels the mini storage facility is an idea worth con- sidering. Jack Lam stated the property owners have indicated general agreement with mixed use. After further discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to modify the proposed General Plan to indicate a mixed use designation for property abounded by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, Archibald Avenue, and the rear portion of Alpha Beta Shopping Center. Further that the mixed use designation be extended to include the northeast corner of Archibald and Baseline which is now shown as high den- sity residential. AYES: COMMISSIONERS GARCIA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS JONES, DAHL ~,t,t,t* Mr. Gil Rodriguez stated Foothill Blvd., east of Vineyard is designated as an alternative site. He asked if the Commission could tell him how much of his property is included in that alternative designation. His property. is. approxi- mately 400' east of Vineyard on Foothill Blvd. Jack Lam stated there is no specific boundary at this time. This designation would be set at the time development is proposed in the area. Commissioner Garcia stated perhaps Mr. Rodriguez could meet with Mr. Lam to discuss this further and it could be brought back to the Commission for review on November 8, 1978. Mr. Rodriguez stated he would like a mixed use designation for his site as he has a savings and loan and two restaurants that are interested in developing here. He is also interested in the possibility of building two story offices which he feels would be a very good development for Foothill Blvd. ,. Planning Commission~utes -15- October 19, 1978 .Tack Lam stated the issue the Commission will have to discuss is how far would they want to recognize commercial along Foothill Blvd. The Commission took a position a few weeks ago that it would recognize the northern portion of Foothill and not the southern portion. Commissioner Garcia stated as he recalls, the Commission was going to study that particular situation a little more. He feels on November 8, 1978, more information can be obtained to address ourselves a little more carefully. Zt was the consensus of the Commission that Mr. Rodriguez' request be heard at the November 8, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. * * ~ * ~ AD.TOURAAfENT Upon MOTION by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of October 19, 1978 at 11:45 p.m. to a Special Meeting on October 24, 1978 in the Library Conference Room at 4:00 p.m. to discuss the Sign Ordinance. ~ * ~ * ~ Respectfully submitted, 'mac `aszs~~~ Nancy McA 'ster,~Secretary . r ~-!'.. .. ` ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 11, 1978 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, October 11, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Herman Rempel, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Richard Dahl, Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy and Herman Rempel * ~ * ~ ~ APPR(1VAT. (1F muvu ina Upon a MOTION by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the Plan- ning Commission minutes of September 13, 1978 as submitted. * ~ * ~ ~ STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam introduced Nancy McAllister, the new Community Development Secretary who replaces Diana Mansfield. ~ * ~ ~ STAFF Jack Lam rev iewed numerous dates which he would like the Commission COMMUNICATIONS to consider for sp ecial meetings in order to meet our goals by the end of the y ear: October 19, 1978 - Finish commercial/residential review of the General Plan October 24, 1978 - Planning Commission study session on the sign ordinance October 25, 1978 ~- - Industrial land use review (Regular Planning Commission meeting) October 31, 1978 - Planning Commission study session on Growth Management November 8, 1978 - Wrap up General Plan recommendation to the City Council (Regular Planning Commission meeting) November 22, 1978 - First Sign Ordinance public hearing and intro- duce Growth Management Policy (Regular Planning Commission meeting) November 29, 1978 - Growth Management Policy Public Hearing (Special Meeting) After some discussion, it was the concensus of the Commission to confirm the meeting dates as recommended by Staff. ~ ~ PUBLIC SITE APPROVAL N0. 78-01 - The development of a public equestrian HEARING boarding facility on approximately' S acres of land-3~cca.ted-at-X53°4----------~ Hermosa Avenue - A-1-5 zone - Request submitted by James McHann Staff Report was presented by Michael Vairin, which is on file in the Planning Division. This was a continued item from the September 27, 1978 Planning Commission meeting, to allow the applicant time to provide additional information in regard to horse densities and trail systems. He reported that the applicant has provided the information requested by the Commission for their review. He reported the County Environmental Health Department was contacted and indicated that they see no problems with the plan as presented. The County will be i ~~ ~~ +~ . i PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -2- October 11, 1978 requesting daily clean up within each individual paddock and the removal of manure from the site at least twice a week. They will also require fly-tight storage bins. Michael Vairin recommended an amendment to Condition No. 6 in the Resolution to include the following statement: That there would be daily clean up in the horse facility to insure control of flies. An additional Planning Division recommendation should be added stating an annual staff review of the development be required to insure compliance with all conditions of approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 78-09 with the additions as recom- mended. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Rempel. Mr. McHann, applicant, reported they have done a comparison survey of their proposed facility and existing boarding facilities and have found that their density is equal or in some cases less than other equestrian sites. He stated their plan does require health department approval and have submitted plans to the department. He stated that;the site is designed for easy maintenance and are employing the most modern equipment. Animal waste will be removed every day and stored in a covered metal dumpster. They will also spray as needed during the fly season. This will be a top notch facility and will be maintained as such. Commissioner Tolstoy asked the applicant if he would comment on the trail systems in the area. Mr. McHann stated he did contact the trail committee and under- stands there is quite a problem in the City with bridle trails. There are no public designated riding trails in the City. The Committee is researching and locating 'riding trails now and they indicated they would like to see an equestrian facility such as their proposal in this area and would hope to see trails run through the area or at least close to it. Any riding of horses at the present tims is done on private property and along the highways. He feels it would be logical to assume that trails will be located in this area in the future. Commissioner Jones asked how many horses will be trailered into this facility. Mr. McHann stated the horses will be kept on the site and he doesn't see many people trailering horses in unless going for a ride in some other area. George Taylor, speaking for Mrs. Carolyn Tate, who owns property to the south of this proposed facility, stated that she is con- cerned about the smell and noise from the 70 horses contemplated as well as dust that these animals will create. He pointed out that Hermosa is a narrow country road. Mrs. Tate is concerned that the horse. people will trailer their horses in and out to horse shows and that when the shows are over in the late evening there will be much traffic on that narrow street. She is also concerned that the people coming to exercise their horses on this facility will drift onto her property and cause a nuisance for her. He stated additional toilet facilities should be required for the people that board horses and come to visit. She feels that an equestrian facility in this area is contrary to the General Plan. Mrs. Betty McKay, representing owners of property adjacent and backing up to the property on Hillside Road, stated they have this property in escrow at the present time and have a tract map in the tentative stage, Tentative Tract No. 10046. She asked if an EIR has been approved for this project. They would like to \J PTIANNING COMMISSION MZNUT. -3- • October 11, 1978 request that a condition be added, if approved, stating that no horses be allowed within 200 feet of the adjoining property line. It was also requested that there should be a 6' concrete wall for protection. It would be a good idea to double check and see what advance work has been done on the tentative tract and how this plan will fit in with the road pattern. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what size lots are in the tentative map . Mrs. McKay stated they are all R-1-20,000. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he believes this area is zoned A-1-5 at the present time. Commissioner Dahl stated R-1-20,000 lots are generally horse pro- perties and allow up to 2 animals per half acre. He stated this property could be developed for animals anyway. No matter how many horses are in the area, it would still generate flies. He stated he does feel the request to keep the horses in areas away from adjoining properties is a good idea. There should be some type of setback to keep animals back away from anothers back yard. Mr. George Shurbeck, owning property in this area, stated he is concerned that when the buildings are constructed there will not be much space to ride the horses. They will be riding the horses in the streets as all adjoining properties are privately owned, or they will ride the horses in the mountains which would<be a fire hazard. Also, a lot of the canyons have water pipes which could be broken up. Mrs. Gwen Smith, owning property next to this proposal, stated she is also concerned about the lack of bridle trails and is concerned about the riding of horses onto private properties. Also the street is very narrow and could be a hazard for those riding on the street. Her prime area of concern is for public saf ety. Mr. McHann, applicant, stated he would agree there is a problem with no bridle trails in the area. There are many homes in this area which are equestrian oriented and there will be many more in the future. As far as noise and flies generated by this use, he doesn't feel horses make much noise. There will be no loud music or cars racing through the area. Equestrian stables are a quiet place. As far as smell and flies, that would depend on how the area is maintained. They are proposing a top notch boarding stable. As far as buffer zone, they are surrounded on 3 sides by eucalyptus trees. They will not have any horse shows on the property. As far as dust, the only dust generated in the area will be in the riding arena. They are proposing to install rain bird sprinklers on all corners of the riding arena and this will be sprinklered regularly to keep down the dust. A fence is proposed on the west and north sides of the property. This will be a place where the children can come and learn how to take care of their horses. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the eucalyptus trees to the south of this development are not part of this development and could possibly be removed. Mr. McHann stated there is a rock fence in this area which is either on their property or on the property line. Chairman Rempel stated it is his opinion that an additional con- dition should be added that an annual review of this development be performed to insure compliance with all requirements of approval. If compliance is not met, then the approval would be revoked. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -4- October 11, 1978 Michael Vairin stated since there are questions on the density, if the Commission would feel that 70 horses is appropriate, an additional condition could be added stating this use shall not exceed 70 horses. Bob Smith asked if bridle trails in the area are a part of the conditions for approval. Jack Lam stated no,., it is not. There are no public horse trails in the city at all. As he understands, an equestrian group is now working with the Public Services Department in putting together a trail system in the city. Chairman Rempel stated the site should be totally fenced. Bob Hill from the audience, stated he would like to speak on behalf of the equestrian center. This type of use is needed in the community. It will teach people to take care of their horses and their property. This facility will be kept clean at all times. The community will benefit by having this facility. Chairman Rempel asked for any further comments from the Commis- sion. Commissioner Jones asked if bridle trails are included on the general plan elements to be completed. Jack Lam stated the bridle trail system is not being considered at this time on the land use element of the General Plan. The equestrian group is working with Bill Holley at the present time in regard to a bridle trail system; however, he does not know at this time how long such a system will take to put together. Commissioner Dahl stated there is presently an equestrian center similar to the one proposed on Carnelian between Banyan and Hill- side. He has talked to two of the families adjoining this develop- ment whose lots back up to the center. They both indicated they have not had any problems with this use at all and that the area has been very well maintained. They stated it is not an eye sore but a real plus in their opinion. Commissioner Garcia stated in terms of density, this proposal is compatible with the existing equestrian activities throughout the community. He stated Hermosa is a very narrow street and he is questioning what might happen during heavy rains in this area. In regard to Engineering Division recommendation No. 3 he feels that Hermosa Avenue should be widened to master plan width and paved with provisions for drainage now and not bonded for comple- tion within two years. He stated a buffer zone to protect adjoin- ing properties should be carefully addressed. The stables should be designed as far away from the surrounding property as possible. He feels consideration should be given regarding exit and entrance to the property adjacent to the north residents. Jack Lam stated he might add that this development will try to preserve the lemon trees on the property. Commissioner Garcia stated in regard to accessibility, he is not satisfied. There being no further comments from the audience; Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Dahl stated all properties going in that area are zoned R-1-20,000 which allow horses. The advantage of this center is that it will allow people to come here to ride, train and work with their horses without having to go out onto bridle trails. } ~. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -5- October 11, 1978 Commissioner Garcia stated he does not question the validity of the project but would like to insure protection and the proper .buffering and aesthetics in relationship to surrounding properties. Commissioner Dahl stated he would like an additional condition added to the Resolution stating prior to development, a land- scape plan and a plan for buffering the property on the north, south and west be presented to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like an additional condi- tion added that the applicant specify what type of fencing is to be used to insure fencing is adequate. Commissioner Garcia stated he would agree with Commissioner Tolstoy. This should be left open to the applicant to decide what would be best for the area with the idea of containing the animals on the property and also as a buffer zone to adjoining properties. There being no further comments, a MOTION was made by Commis- sioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried to approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-09 based on the conditions and findings listed therein, which are to include those conditions mentioned above. ~ * * * ~ PUBLIC SITE APPROVAL N0. 78-02 - Request for an Aluminum Recycling HEARING Plant in an M-2 zone generally located on the north side of Sixth Street between Archibald and Turner Avenue - Request submitted by Reynolds Aluminum Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported this operation will take place within an enclosed building. The plant would require eight parking spaces and the applicant has provided eighteen spaces. He indicated the applicant proposes to incorporate noise attenuation techniques into the plant to minimize noise impact. The applicant has assured Staff that the noise generated by the plant would not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties. The applicant was to submit noise level statistics for their plant located in the City of Hayward; however, at this time that information has not been received. He recommended that the Commission could approve this development subject to the added condition that it bring back to the Commission for review, the noise impact prior to development or the Commission could postpone this matter until the next meeting when the noise information is in hand. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Rempel. Mr. Putnam Storrs, representative of Reynolds Aluminum, stated he thought the noise level information had been sent to staff.. He stated they are confident that they can meet the noise require- ments for this facility. They are in hopes that this won't have to be postponed at this time. Commissioner Garcia stated he is concerned about the appearance of the 45' high storage bin proposed. Mr. Storrs stated it does meet requirements of the ordinance. It is a metal type bin for storage of the aluminum. Chairman Rempel asked how far this bin is located from Archibald Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -6- October 11, 1978 Mr. Storrs stated he does not know the exact distance; but would guess it is at least the distance of two city blocks. He feels it would be very difficult to see the silo from Archibald Avenue. .Commissioner Garcia stated according to the,site plan a chain link fence is proposed around the development. Landscaping considerations have to be addressed. He .stated he is disappointed with the appearance of this development. The surrounding proper- ties must be considered in terms of proper buffering. Commissioner Tolstoy stated his concern about the front eleva- tion of the building. Jack Lam stated the Commission could require articulation of the front building elevation and consideration of screening of the front portion of the fencing and re-enforcement of the condition in the Resolution that states detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for approval prior to building permits. He reported one of our staff members did discuss the noise statis- tics on the telephone this afternoon; however, the rest of the staff has not been able to review these statistics. City Attorney stated this Commission must make a finding that the site plan protects the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. If they find this is not being met they have reason to deny the request. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Upon MOTION by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner ~ Tolstoy, and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue review of Site Approval No. 78-02 to the special meeting of October 19, 1978 in order that the applicant give further consideration and study of the project satisfactory to the development of the community and properties surrounding this proposed project. ~ ~ ~ * ~ At this time, Chairman Rempel asked that the General Plan public hearing be moved to the end of the Agenda and that the other Agenda items be reviewed at this time. OLD BUSINESS MINOR DE\7IATION N0. 78-01 - Magnolia Development - Southwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report which is onfile in the Plan- ning Division. He reported this project was approved by the County Planning Staff, the project has already been issued building permits, and construction has.. already commenced. The approval lacked proper landscape areas and neglected any considera- tion for building elevation treatments and proper circulation on the site. Staff has contacted the developer of the project and asked his cooperation in making improvements to the site that would improve safety and circulation on the site that would resolve some drainage problems and improve the aesthetics of the development. The applicant has been very cooperative and staff feels that the modifications proposed would be a benefit to the community. Without such modifications, the project would be built as approved and would detract from the visual character of the intersection and the neighborhood. He recommended that the Planning Commission approve Minor Deviation No. 78-O1 subject to the conditions as listed in the report. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -7- October 11, 1978 Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Tolstoy stated staff should be commended for their fine work on this as the improvements are a step in the right direction for the community. Chairman Rempel asked if the applicant is present and would wish to speak regarding this matter. There being no comments from the audience, a motion was made by Commmissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to approve Minor Deviation No. 78-01 subject to the conditions as listed in the staff report. * * * * ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 8:47 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. ~ * ~ * ~ OLD BUSINESS Modification of Tract Conditions for Regency Equestrian Estates - Tracts 9378-79. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff - report which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported this tract was approved by the County and as a condition of approval it was required that a standard or approved block wall or other acceptable alternative be required along the rear lots of the tract on Hillside Road. The County requirement- was not for the purpose of flood protection but solely for the purpose of`providing screening.. Directly behind the block wall is a bridle trail and behind the bridle trail is a grove of citrus trees that were preserved on the site. It is the desire of the developer to have the block wall requirement removed from the conditions and substitute the wall with split rail type fencing along both sides of the bridle trail path. Staff feels that because of the subdivision the alternative of the split rail fence on either side of the bridle path would be more appropriate to the surroundings than a solid block wall. Staff recommends that the Commission amend the conditions of approval to delete the requirement of a solid block wall along the perimeter of Hillside Avenue and instead require a split rail type fence be constructed on both sides of the bridle easement. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Jones asked who will maintain the fence. Jack Lam stated it would be up to the home owners association to maintain the fence. Chairman Rempel asked if the applicant was present to make any comments. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there will be any provisions made by the Home Owners Association to water the lemon trees on the property. Applicant stated the trees will remain on the individual lots and it will be up to each home owner to maintain his own trees. - ~.- `~_Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to suggest that an irrigation system be installed to water the trees for each home by the developer to help insure that they be maintained. In regard to the wood fence and the maintenance involved with wood, he suggested a cement rail fence which looks like split rail be proposed as it would be easier to maintain and will look nice. PLANNING COMMISSION MIN~S -8- • October 11, 1978 Commissioner Tolstoy made a motion to delete the block wall requirement and that an additional condition be added stating that provision be made for irrigation to the citrus trees on the individual lots. Further, that the split rail fence be concrete instead of wood. Commissioner Jones seconded the motion. Commissioner Dahl requested that an additional condition be added that provision be provided for each property for access to the bridle trail. Chairman Rempel stated if the Commission requires the applicant to go to too much expense over and above what has already been approved he might decide not to go along with this at all. The concrete rail fence along with additional irrigation required is going to be very expensive to the developer and they will pro- bably end up putting in the block wall as already approved. Chairman Rempel stated he would prefer the split rail fence to the block walla After some discussion, Commissioner Tolstoy and Commissioner Jones withdrew their motion as indicated above. Commissioner Dahl stated the applicant has indicated the gates from the individual lots to the bridle trail would not be a problem and as far as providing irrigation pipes to the citrus trees he doesn't feel that would be a major problem for the developer. The applicant stated he would check with the developer on the cost of providing irrigation, the gates, and if desired the cost of the concrete rail and could report back to the Conmiis- sion. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to continue review of the modi- fication of tract conditions for Regency Equestrian Estates - Tracts 9378-79 to October 25, 1978 in order for the applicant to check out the costs of providing irrigation pipes, gates, and the cost of a concrete rail fence. ~ ~ * * ~ NEW DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-30 - The demolition of an existing ser- BUSINESS vice station and construction of a new service station facility located on the northeast corner of Arrow and Archibald - C-1 zone - Request submitted by Mobil Oil Corp. Michael Vairin reviewed the staff report which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported that the proposed service station is in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development. Staff recommended approval of this Director Review subject to the findings and conditions as listed in Resolution No. 78-14. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the median proposed by the Engi- neering Department would have a provision for left hand turns. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, stated yes, it would provide for a left hand turning pocket. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the audience. PLANNING COMMISSION MINES -9- ~ October 11, 1978 Dave Pollard, representing Mobil Oil, stated the main concern that his company has is the question of the one driveway versus two driveways. His company has indicated that if the City will not allow some flexibility in being able to retain the two driveways at this station, they probably would not go ahead with this proposal. They feel the two driveways are needed for good traffic flow in and out of the station. Lloyd Hubbs stated staff is looking at service stations very carefully as the City would like to set a standard for future service stations within the City. We want to look very closely at these with regard to access. Jack Lam stated he would not want the approval of this service station to set any poor precedence for future projects. Commissioner Dahl asked what is the benefit of a median versus a left turn lane. Lloyd Hubbs stated the median will permit the left turn move- ment and force people to go to the intersection to turn. This is very beneficial from a traffic standpoint. Upon MOTION by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Co~mnissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to approve`Resolution No. No:~78-14 subject to the findings and conditions as listed in the Staff Report with the added condition that the island on Archibald Avenue should be implemented and maintain the tradeoff with the two access lanes to the service stations. * * ~ * ~ NEW BUSINESS DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-28 -Request for a Light Manufacturing building in an M-1 zone generally located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Helms Avenue - Request submitted by F.E. MacDonald for Pneudraulics, Inc. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report in detail which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported the applicant is requesting approval of a 31,690 square feet manufacturing building. He stated that the proposed development is in conformance with the proposed General Plan and compatible to surrounding uses and suitable for the project site. Staff recommends approval of~Resolution No. 78-10 subject to the conditions and findings as listed in that Resolution. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. Mr. MacDonald stated they have reviewed the staff report. He stated they do have a question of the Fire Department about one of the conditions and asked if these requirements can be resolved with them. The Fire Department has recommended that all buildings be provided with an approved automatic fire detection system providing for the transmission of all fire alarms to the Ontario Fire Department dispatching center. He stated this is an unusual requirement to place on a development of this size. Chairman Rempel stated this item is listed in the Resolution as a recommendation not a requirement. Jack Lam stated these items should be directed to the Fire Dis- trict office. They have their own ordinances. Mr MacDonald stated regarding Engineering Division recommen- dation No. 14, he would assume those improvements would only be required of the property they are now developing. Lloyd Hubbs stated that is correct. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -10- October 11, 1978 City Attorney stated it does appear the Fire Department condi- tion does suggest that the building will be sprinklered although ti is not made an explicit condition. Mr. MacDonald stated he would agree the building needs to be sprinklered. His question is whether or not the fire alarm system would be required. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commis- sioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-10 based on the conditions and findings listed therein. ~ ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-29 - Request for a Light Industrial Building in an M-2 zone generally located on the south side of 8th Street east of Archibald Avenue - Request submitted by F.E. MacDonald for L.V. Hofgaarden. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the Staff Report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. He reported Mr. MacDonald is requesting approval of an 18,000 square foot light industrial building in an M-2 zone. This building would be the second of a planned eight building complex. He recommended that an additional condition of approval be added to the Resolution which states: A master plan of development be approved prior to any future additions. He stated the proposed change is in conformance with the proposed General Plan, compatible to surrounding uses, and suitable for the project site. Staff recommends. approval of Resolution No. 78-11 subject to the findings and conditions as listed with the addition as indicated above. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. Mr. MacDonald stated he is in agreement with the staff report as presented with the exception of Fire Department condition No. ll which indicates all buildings shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system and an approved automatic fire detection system providing for the transmission of all fire alarms to the Ontario Fire Department dispatching center be installed. He asked if this can be discussed with the Fire Department. Jack Lam stated if there is any question regarding the Fire Department recommendations, perhaps this could be discussed with them and be brought back to the next Planning Commission meeting for review. He didn't feel as though this condition should be withdrawn until a Fire Department representative could be present to review it with the Commission. Commissioner Garcia stated he doesn't feel this is an unusual requirement, and that it should remain as a condition. Chairman Rempel stated we cannot, as a Commission, rule on the requirements of the Fire Department. There being no further discussion, a Motion was made by Commis- sioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to approve Resolution No. 78-11 subject to the condi- tions and findings as listed with the additional condition 1125 as indicated by staff. City Attorney stated this condition will require the automatic sprinkler system and approved fire detection system as stated by the Fire Department. He stated this can be further dis- cussed by the applicant with the Fire Department but it is not a good policy for the Commission to require a condition that could be altered. .~ ' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -11- October 11, 1978 Chairman Rempel stated by approving the Fire Department condition which might not be required by the Department, the Commission is in a sense writing an ordinance for the City. Jack Lam stated since the Commission did recommend this condi- tion, the Fire Department may wish to present their conditions to the Commission of why this should or should not be required. Commissioner Garcia stated his concern is that the proper fire protection should be provided. The applicant can come back and relieve that condition if the Fire Department so recommends. Jack Lam stated another solution could be considered which is to word the condition that the sprinkler system and automatic fire detection system be required as per the requirements of the Foothill Fire District. Chairman Rempel stated he feels the motion should be rescinded so that it complied with all requlations and ordinances without tying our hands or the builders. If they require the building to be sprinklered it will be sprinklered. A statement could be added in order that it would not have to come back to the Com- mission for approval if altered. A MOTION was made by Chairman Rempel, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to rescind the above motion. A MOTION was then made by Chairman Rempel, seconded by Commis- sioner Dahl, and unanimously carried (Commissioner Jones abstained) to approve Resolution No. 78-11 subject to the findings and con- ditions as listed with the following changes and additions: Fire Department recommendation No. 11 should be amended to read: All buildings shall be provided with an automatic sprinkler system and an approved automatic fire detection system providing for the transmission of all fire alarms to the Ontario Fire Department dispatching center be installed as per Foothill Fire District ordinances. A new Planning Division recommendation No. 25 should be added to read: A master plan of development be approved prior to any future additions. ~ ~ ~ * ~ NEW DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-12 - The development of a two-story office BUSINESS building totaling 10,000 square feet to be located at 8030 Vine- yard Avenue - C-2 zone - Request submitted by Alderfer Ranch Partnership. Staff Report was presented by Michael Vairin, which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported the applicant submitted this request to County Planning Department prior to the estab- lishment of the City Planning Division. The County processed this application and denied it based on the recommendations of the Flood Control District. The Flood Control District stated that there were not adequate flood protection facilities as Cucamonga channel is contained only by an earth berm. The applicant did not appeal this decision as City Staff requested that a new application with full details be submitted to the City for review and action. After review, Staff finds that the sub- ject site is subject to flooding. He reported staff feels that there are presently no provisions available to reasonably protect this site from flood hazards until such time that per- manent improvements are installed in the Cucamonga Creek. Staff recommends that this project be denied without prejudice so that the applicant may reapply once adequate flood protection facili- ties are provided for the subject site. '.. ' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -12- October 11, 1978 _. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. Mr. W. Schultz, applicant, stated they asked staff to put this item on the Agenda in order to speak to the Commission because they feel the Commission has granted development in this particular area at least on one other occasion. They feel they have the same rights to develop their property. They have applied for and obtained Federal Flood Insurance on this property so they are at a loss as to why the approval of this development would affect the City's liability. Commissioner Dahl stated he doesn't feel the circumstances of this request are similar to those of a previously approved application in this area. The previous approval was given for a Mexican Restaurant which did not have these same pro- blems. Commissioner Garcia stated he would agree with Commissioner Dahl that this request is not similar to the approval of the Mexican Restaurant because the Restaurant was an existing structure and this project is a complete new project. Lloyd Hubbs stated this project was reviewed with the appli- cant in the Development Review Committee meeting and the poten- tial flooding problems and drainage were studied. If the applicant can determine that this property may be protected from substantial floods, then approval could be considered. It was required that the applicant provide the city with a detailed study stating how the site can be protected. Mr. MacDonald-stated a great deal of acreage is involved around the surrounding area and it would require an aerial topography which would become very expensive. They would hope that the city could help establish criteria so some reasonable approach can be obtained. Lloyd Hubbs stated the city, at the present time, has a very limited staff. The applicant needs to show the city how the development could be developed without any flooding or drain- age problems. Chairman Rempel asked if a person is able to get flood insurance on a particular piece of property, does that release the city's responsibilit;~ if approval to develop is given to an applicant. Lloyd Hubbs stated the Federal Flood Insurance Program and the ability of the City to obtain flood insurance was conditioned on passing an ordinance such as that established in Ordinance No. 24. As a part of the Federal Flood Insurance Program, they will be auditing the City's review. of development in the future to see that we are complying with the intent of the ordinance and if they find that the intent is not complied with it could jeopardize future liability of obtaining flood insurance. Mr. MacDonald asked if the Commission would consider con- tinuing this Director Review in order that they may bring in the necessary data to support this request. There being no further discussion, a MOTION was made by Com- missioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy.and unanimously carried to continue review of Director Review No. 78-12 to December 13, 1978 in order that the applicant be given an - opportunity to gather information regarding flooding and drainage of this property. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -13- October 11, 1978 a NEW DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 78-32 - The development of a multi- BUSINESS tenant industrial complex to be located on the southwest corner of Helms and Ninth Street - M-R zone - Request submitted by G.S.R. Development Staff report was presented by Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported the development plan as proposed is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. Further, such a development is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-15 based on the findings and conditions listed. Chairman Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. The applicant or his representative was not present to speak regarding this item. Chairman Rempel stated with the parking as proposed, it would only allow for 2 cars per unit proposed. Jack Lam stated under the present ordinance, they are legally within the requirements of the<ordinance_in regard to parking. Chairman Rempel stated he feels the parking is totally inadequate for this type of development. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree that the parking is inadequate. He also has another concern. He felt the front elevation of the buildings should be looked at very carefully as they are not compatible to other developments in the area, which do not have warehouse doors exposed to the front elevation. Jack Lam stated that there is an alternative to screening warehouse doors. Since there is a grade difference of at least 5' from 9th Street and the subject site, the front landscaped area could be mounded and heavily landscaped to. screen warehouse doors. Commissioner Garcia recommended that this project be continued for a total review of the site as far as elevations along 9th Street and parking. A MOTION was then made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to continue review of Director Review No. 78-32 to December 13, 1978 in order for the applicant to totally review the site as far as providing sufficient parking and to redesign the front elevations to be in keeping with surrounding pro- perties. ~ ~ ~ * ~ Chairman Rempel called a recess at 11:17 p.m. prior to the General Plan public hearing. Meeting reconvened at 1L•30>p.m. ~ ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC GENERAL PLAN - Certain residential and commercial designa- HEARING lions was discussed. However, reserve area was not discussed at this meeting. ~, , PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -14- October 11, 1978 Jack Lam stated the Commission left off with review of item 4 of the Staff Report. He reported this item is for the area on the north side of 19th Street between Ramona and the commercial designation on the corner of 19th and Archibald. He stated the General Plan designates this area__ as low density residential. He reported Vanguard apparently has R-3 multi-family zoning and desires to retain the same. Since the plan fosters multi-family adjacent to commercial facilities and since multi-family development can be adequately buffered both by the proposed freeway, the commercial facility at 19th Street, the potential extension of Ramona, and because the site has adequate access, the area can be considered for high density residential. He recommended that this area be changed to high density residential. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to see the whole area from Hermosa to Ramona high density. Jack Lam stated there is still land between Ramona and the mixed use as well as land between the other side of Hermosa. We are only making a recommendation for that area between the shopping center and Ramona at this time. We are not discussing the area east of Ramona. Chairman Rempel asked if any further correspondence has been received in regard to this area. Jack Lam stated staff has received only the letter from Vanguard who is concerned because they have gone through a zone change and have a plan submitted for a multi-family residential development in this area. No other corres- pondence has been received for this area. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Ron Nottingham, representing Vanguard Builders, stated they are in favor of the staff recommendation. They are anxious to go ahead with their multi-family development in this area. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. There being no further comments, a MOTION was made by Commis- sioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones, and unanimously carried to approve staff recommendation for high density resi- dential in the area on the north side of 19th Street between Ramona and the commercial designation on the corner of 19th and Archibald. ~ ~ ~ Area: Hermosa Avenue school locations below 19th Street.. Jack Lam reviewed the staff report for the Commission. He reported the Jones Company objects to the location of pro- posed schools on their property. He stated the School Dis- trict has examined school site selections very carefully and indicates that the general locations shown are excellent sites able to serve a large walk-in area. The School District is going to proceed with plans to purchase at least one elementary school site somewhere in this location. He recommended that the Commission retain General Plan designation for school site in this area. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -15- October 11, 1978 Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no discussion from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing and asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Garcia stated, as indicated, this is a general location the school district is talking about and he would agree that a school should be located in this general area. There being no further discussion, a motion ;.was made by Com- missioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried to retain the General Plan designation for the school site as designated.'` Area: Park designation east of Archibald above Foothill Jack Lam reported Marlborough Company is concerned with the location of the park site. He reported the arguments concerning the location of park site has been debated over and over in the past. These designations are not necessarily site specific. It designates a concept that some park area near the vicinity would be desirable from the standpoint of a public facility. He recommended that the park site designation be retained. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no discussion from the audience Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing and asked for questions from the Commission to the staff. There being no further comments, a motion was made by Commis- sioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones, and unanimously carried to retain the park site designation east of Archibald above Foothill Blvd. as submitted. ~ ~ ~ COMMERCIAL ISSUES - General Plan desi Jack Lam reported if any commercial uses are to be associated with existing uses thought to be important to the heritage or history of the community, detailed examination of those uses should be done prior to indiscriminately creating commercial designations. Criteria and standards for such selections as well as other planning considerations must be made before any such decisions are made. The General Plan currently provides for policies that would allow for a zoning procedure to enable non-residential uses in residential areas provided that standards and criteria are met and other planning con- siderations have been examined and if such sites are found to be in fact important to the heritage or history of the community. He recommended that the General Plan designation, until further study, be retained as low density residential. Chairman Rempel asked for questions fron the Commission to the staff. Commissioner Dahl stated if this area should be shown as low density residential, would Opici Winery have a legal noncon- forming use. i PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -16- October 11, 1978 Jack Lam stated yes, that is correct. Most cities have two options: 1) they can maintain it as a legal non- conforming use until such time the property changes hands or use, demolishes or removes that use, or 2) some cities adopt an amortization schedule which is normally 15 years at which time the use must sieze. The amortiza- tion schedule is not very well adhered to in most communi- ties. However, it would be up to the Commission on which of the options it would prefer. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no discussion from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Com- missioner Garcia, and unanimously carried to retain the General Plan designation of low density residential for Opici Winery until-further study. * * * ~ ~ Area: Area abounded by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, Archibald and the north side of Baseline - General Plan desig- nation High Density Residential Jack Lam asked that this item be continued to the next meeting (October 19, 1978) as the applicant can not be present at this time. It was the concensus of the Commission that this area be continued for review on October 19, 1978. * ~ * ~ Area: Thomas Vineyard Winery - General Plan Designation - Service Commercial Jack Lam reported Thomas Winery intends to expand the small commercial center. He stated the General Plan does not pro- hibit this since the designation is service commercial whether a free standing use or a center. He recommended that the General Plan designation of service commercial for this area be retained. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. There being no further comments, a motion was made by Commis- sioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, and unanimously carried to retain the General Plan designation of service commercial for the Thomas Vineyard Winery. * ~ ~ * ~ Area: Alternative A. General Plan designation - Regional Center Alternative Jack Lam reported the issue is that an '..individual objects to regional shopping center concept as a focal point for community, and desires more open space. He reported that the community can support a regional commercial center which can have bene- fits both to the community in terms of the availability of commercial facilities as well as contributions to the co~mnunity tax base. Since it is difficult to project precisely into the future and project precise locations of such a center proposal it was desirable to show the three most reasonable PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -17- October 11, 1978 alternatives for potential center sites and to indicate a choice in the General Plan rather than to reflect one site. He recommended that the Commission maintain the policy position as previously discussed. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no discussion from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. There being no further discussion, a MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to maintain the policy position of the Planning Commission for the regional center alternative. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Southeast corner of Hellman and Foothill. General designation - Service Commercial Jack Lam reported Lucas desires commercial center designa- tion on this area. He reported there is no conflict between this desire and the General Plan designation since service commercial does not discriminate between freestanding uses and multi-tenant center. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. After general discussion, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Com- missioner Rempel and unanimously carried to keep the service commercial designation for the area located on the southeast corner of Hellman and Foothill. ~ * * * ~ Area: East side of Vineyard between Arrow Route and Foothill. General Plan designation - Mixed Use Jack Lam reported the issue was a desire for commercial uses rather than mixed uses. Vineyard is a major arterial and a major entry into the City. It is undesirable to encourage uses that would change the character of the street to a commer- ciaY strip when there is an opportunity to control development of the area by allowing only uses which develop less vehicular turn movements from Vineyard. He recommended that the mixed use designation be retained. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Garcia stated mixed use designation is needed throughout the community. It was his opinion that the mixed use designation be retained. After general discussion, a MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to retain the mixed use designation for the area on the east side of Vineyard between Arrow Route and Foothill. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. PLANNING COMMISSION 'MINUTES -18- October 11, 1978 Area: Area abounded by Southern Pacific Tracks, Devore Freeway and East Avenue in Etiwanda - General Plan Designa- tion - Windrow Jack Lam reported the issue is the property owner feels property is not conducive for residential development and instead desires commercial designation. He reported because of the area's relative small size and buffering from the transportation corridors and its exposure and accessibility, service commercial can be compatible on this site. He recommended that the Commission modify the General Plan to reflect service commercial for this area. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commis- sioner Tolstoy, and unanimously carried to modify the General Plan to reflect service commercial for the area abounded by the Southern Pacific tracks, Devore Freeway and East Avenue in Etiwanda. ~ * ~ ~ ~ Commissioner Garcia stated the area along Baseline and Hermosa is shown as mixed use. In evaluating this area and the land around it, we have a mobilehome park to the east, residential to the west and to the south. He feels that that particular area should be changed to allow more medium density residential. After general discussion, a MOTION was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, and unanimously carried to change the designation from mixed use to medium density residential on the northwest, southwest and southeast corners of Baseline and Hermosa Avenues. ~ * ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT Upon MOTION by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, and unanimously carried it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of October 11, 1978 at 12:17 p.m. to a Special Meeting on October 19, 1978 in the Community Services Building to finish the commercial/residential por- tions of the General Plan. * * ~ Respectfully submitted, Nancy McA ister, Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCM10NGA Planning Commission Minutes September 27, 1978 Regular h1eeting CALL TO The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ORDER Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, September 27,1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Herman Rempel, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL Present: Commissioners Richard Dahl, Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy, CALL and Herman Rempel. APPROVAL Community Development Director, Jack Lam, reported that due to the opening OF .: of the Building and Safety Division office, the minutes were not ready at the MINUTES time and they would be prepared for the October 25, 1978 Planning Commission agenda. PUBLIC SITE APPROVAL N0, 78-01 The development of a public equestrian boarding fac- IIEARING ility on approximately 5 acres of land located at 5394 Hermosa Avenue - A-1-5 zone - Request submitted by James McHann, Staff report was presented by Michael Vairin, which is on file in the Planning Division. The facility will be located north of Hillside Road, and will house 70 horses. It will include a training ring, a horse exerciser, and feed hop- pers. The site is presently a grove with one residence. Three-fourths of that grove will be retained. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 78-09 with the following change: Section 3, condition 6. "That the applicant submit complete plans to the County Health Department and obtain the necessary permits. That such permits shall be filed by the applicant with the Commission prior to issuance of permits." The public hearing segment was opened by Chairman Rempel. Mr. McHann, the applicant, responded to the question of a potential fly prob- lem. He indicated that fly tight bins would be used, and that the waste would be removed on a daily basis. Mr. Steve Marlow, property owner to the north of the proposed equestrian fac- ility stated that his wife opposed the Facility. They are primarily concerned with the north driveway and potential dust problems. Commissioner Rempel indicated that the applicant is being required to lay down slag rock on all driveways. Mr. Vick Cherbak, indicated that he was in favor of a project like this one, but that he was concerned about flies. He was also concerned that people from this facility ride in. '. .. P. C. Minutes September 27, 1978 Page 2 Mr. Ron Nottingham, of Vanguard indicated that he was concerned about the possible noise and dirt, and the concentration of horses. Staff indicated that there was a condition in the Resolution that if no permits were obtained within two years than this approval would be null and void. The public hearing portion of this item was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the applicant has researched the availability of public trails in the immediate area other than the use of the streets. Mr. McHann responded that there were forest service trails just up the street. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated that to gain access to these forest service trails, riders would have to cross private property and that some owners had already had problems with vandalism to their water gathering systems. Com- missioner Tolstoy then requested that some kind of provision be made to in- sure compliance with the condition concerning the flies. He wanted recourse in case the County Health Department failed to correct the situation. Jack Lam indciated that the resolution could be amended to include a condition that would allow for a review period and that if the facility were not in com- pliance then approval could be revoked. Commisioner Tolstoy then requested information on how a figure of 70 horses was arrived at. Jack Lam indicated that the County had no ordinanance pertaining to the number of horses on any one site. City Attorney, Hobson, indicated that an annual review period rather than a specific date was a much better provision to use in citing violations if the need ever arose to do such. ' Jack Lam recommended that this item be postponed until the subsequent Planning Commission meeting to allow time to contact the County Health Department and to have the applicant supply further information to the use of the facility and to allow staff time to check other similar locations and their density of horses. MOTION: Commissioner Tolstoy made a motion to continue this item to the next Planning Commission meeting. Seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously by the Commission. PUBLIC Zone Change No. 87-73 Changing the zone from R-1-T to C-1 for 10 acres of HEARING land located on the southeast .corner of Baseline and Carnelian Avenue. Re- quest submitted by Ontario Savings and Loan. Jack Lam gave the staff report which is on file in the Planning Division. The applicant has agreed to a restrictive covenant that will keep the uses P.C. Minutes September 27, 1978 Page 3 along the lines of an A-P type zoning. Also the following insertion is to be included in Section A, Number S, "Therefore, there will be Planning Commission review if there should be any request for alteration of this agreement." Mr. Lam indicated that under Section A, item 3, only 20% can be used for com- mercial use. The applicant has requested that this be applied only to the main building. Mr. Jim Crowell, of Corwell/Levanthal, indicated that the layout would be conducive to a 20% limit on the main building only. Mr. Hobson, made corrections to the "Declaration of Restricitons" as follows un er "General Provisions," item 3, Sth line frown, starting with "the fore- going restrictions and covenants shall... should read as follows, the foregoing restrictions and covenants will be in full force and effect until January 1, 1988 and will..." Discussion then returned to the issue of the cap of 20o commercial usage. Jack Lam indicated tha the following could be changed, under section A, item 2 to read as follows: "Of the total square footage of all structures con- tained on said tract no more than 20% of the total square footage of said structures may be used for a retail commercial establishment .conforming to the uses specified above exempting a sit-down restaurant." Chairman Rempel then requested that any opponents to this project should come forward or proponents. There were none. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, it was moved to approve the Zone Change No. 87-73 with the attached amendments on the conditions of the restrictive covenant, b1otion was unani- mously carried by the Commission. RECESS A short recess was declared at 8:15 p.m. by Chairman Rempel. The Commission reconvened at 8:30 p.m. with all members still present. NEw Parcel Map no.4Cs93--- Dividing 2.78 acres of land located on the west side BUSINESS of Sapphire Street, approximately 330' north of 19th St. into 4 parcels - R-18500 zoning - Map submitted by Vanguard Builders. Jack Lam presented the staff report on this project which is on file in the Planning Division. Mr. Lam indicated that this parcel map was in compliance with the "Moratorium" ordinance as there were already three existing residences on the property and only one new residence could be created. Staff recommended that the Commission adopt a "Negative Declaration" and staff further recom- mended that the Commission approvl Parcel Map No. 4693. The public segment of this hearing was opened. There appeared no opponents. Ron Nottingham, of Vanguard Homes, appeared and indicated that they were not in opposition to this resolution. P.C. Minutes September 27, 1978 Page 4 MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, it was moved to adopt the resolution approving the Parcel Map No. 4693 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Motion was carried unanimously by the Commission. NEW Director Review No. 78-20 An industrial development on 19 acres of land BUSINESS located on the east side of Archibald, north and adjacent to the Frito-Lay plant. M-1 and M-2 Zone. Request submitted by Vanguard Builders. Michael Vairin presented the staff report on this project which is on file in the Planning Division. Staff recommends that only two access points be allowed and that the applicant has agreed to this recommendation. Staff recommends no parallel parking on the site and the center parking aisle as there is not adequate room for backing up. Chuck Beck, of Vanguard Builders, indicated that there will be extensive land- scaping on the project and that they did not object to the recommendations of staff. Chairman Rempel then requested that any opponents to this project should come forward or any proponents. There were none. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, and seconded by Commissioner Dahl, it was moved to adopt Resolution no. 78-08 with all the findings and conditions as set forth by that document, and upon request by Dahl to attach an amendment to this motion that this project come back for Director Review approval of their M-2 buildings, to assure its compatibility with the General plan. Rempel made the motion to adopt the resolution with the subsequent approval requirements, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, and carried unanimously by the Commission. NEW Director Review No. 78-19 - Proposal for an office-retail building on the BUSINESS northeast corner of Amethyst and 19th St. Jack Lam presented the staff report on this project which is on file in the Planning Division. He indicated that the applicant has agreed to a "Restric- tive Covenant" on this property as set forth in Resolution 78-06 with one correction to item H14, of the Engineering Division as follows: eliminate 69' curb separation and replace it with 64' curb separation. Also on item k23 of this same section should read as follows: eliminate "All roof material," and substitute with "all roof mounted equipment shall be...." David Stringer of Vanir Development stated that they would like to have it zoned C-1 pursuant to an agreement similar to that of the Ontario Savings and Loan agreement that was on the agenda earlier. Jack Lam responded that so long as the first two items were agreeable with Foothill Fire District, staff could concur in their modification. P. C. Minutes September 27, 1978 Page 5 MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, it was moved to adopt Resolution No. 78-06 subject to the amending of the conditions as indicated. Motion was carried unanimously by the Commission. GENERAL Residential-Issues. PLAN 1. North side of Foothill Blvd, between Vineyard and Hellman. Staff reportedthat this area is presently designated as multi-family res- idential and recommended that it be changed to service commercial. Public segment was opened. There were no opponents. Ralph Lewis, of Lewis Homes, spoke in favor of the proposed change from residential to commercial. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, it was moved to change the designation of this area on -the General Plan to service commercial. Motion carried unanimously by the Commission. 2. East side of Chaffey College Mr,_Catanzaro President of Chaffey College, stated that Chaffey has not yet reached its potential student.enrollment. The traffic situation on Haven and 19th St. is already a problem. There is 'also;a problem with noise gen- erated from the use of the college facilities (football: games, etc.). In addition, with all the housing going up, already a number of people are using the college for recreational purposes on the weekends, and very quickly the college will be required to hire additional security guards and possibly fence the college. Mr. Robert Owen, of Landmark Consultants, stated that a project is in the works for that area. He indicted that the Chaffey Regional Park would pro- vide a location for recreational use and that high density projects require that recreational facilities be provided on the site. Mr. Doug Hone, of 7333 Hellman Avenue, indicated that there were other traffic problems with Wilson and 19th St. and that the freeway would alleviate some of these problems. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, indicated that in reality single-family homes generate more trips per day than do multi-family dwellings in high density locations. Mr. Lowell Jones, indicated that there was a need for some type of high density around the college and that the traffic generation-,,. question has not really been discussed. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, and seconded by Commissioner Dahl, it was moved to change the designation around Chaffey College on not only the east, but the south and west as well, to medium density rather than high density. '- P. C. Minutes September 27, 1978 Page 6 3. East bank of Cucamonga Channel, northeast corner of the City above Hillside Road. Staff stated that there has been concern that this area would allow too high of a density. The present designation allows 1 to 2 units per acre. Staff recommended that the General Plan remain as shown. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jones, it was moved to accept staff's recommendation to leave this location as very low density. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, it was moved to continue the discussion of the General Plan items to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Motion was unanimously carried by the Commission. NEW BUSINESS Resolution for establishing access policy for major and scondary thorough- fares. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer made the staff presentation. This resolution will allow the City to establish policies. The resolution recommends five points that are design considerations that will be the guidelines for any development. It was recommended that Commission give the resolution a reading at this time so that interested parties could have an idea of what was covered by the proposed resolution. Indicated that public hearings would be held prior to adoption and to allow for the coordination with Caltrans on requirements they will want on 19th St. and Foothill Blvd. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, and seconded by Commissioner Dahl, it was moved to read the resolution and continue discussion to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Motion carried unanimously by Commission. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Tolstoy, it was moved to accept and adopt the Consent Calendar as submitted. b1otion carried unanimously by Commission. ADJOURN- MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, MENT it was moved to adjourn the September 27, 1978, Planning Commission meeting. Carried unaimously. Adjourned at 11:27 p. m. V Re pectf ly ubmitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development • ~~ .' • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 13, 1978 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednes- day, September 13, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Herman Rempel, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ~ ~ ,t ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Richard Dahl, Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy, and Herman Rempel. ~ ~ ~ ~ APPROVAL OF Commissioner Tolstoy requested a correction to the minutes MINUTES as follows: Page 15, fourth line from the bottom, the word should read "quickly" rather than "quitely". Upon a motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commis- sioner Tolstoy and carried unanimously, it was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of August 23, 1978 with the correction as cited. ~ ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC ZONE CHANGE N0. 123-81 - Changing the zone from A-1 HEARING (limited agriculture) to C-2 (general business) and M-1 (light industrial) for property located at the southwest corner of I-15 and Foothill Blvd. - Request submitted by William Longley. Staff report was presented by Michael Vairin, which is on file in the Planning Division. This was a continued item from the August 23, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. Staff reported that the C-2 zone was improper for the entire piece of property and relative to the applicant's use. Staff recommended that C-2 zoning be granted to the first 300' of the subject property and that the remaining portion be zoned M-1. Staff indicated that the applicant was in agreement with this proposal. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 78-OS as submitted. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Rempel. There were no .opponents, nor proponents to the zone change. The public hearing was then closed. Upon MOTION by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commis- sioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-OS based on the condi- tions and findings listed therein and transfer such recom- mendation to the City Council for their review. ~ ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC ZONE CHANGE N0. 87-73 - Changing the zone from R-1-T to HEARING C-1 for 10 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Baseline and Carnelian - Request submitted by Ontario Savings and Loan. Staff reported that this item was being continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 27, 1978 (as the "Declarations of Restrictions" were not complete for Com- mission review). The applicant was in agreement with this request. _~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES l~ -2- SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 Upon MOTION by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Com- missioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue Z.C. No. 87-73 to September 27, 1978. * * * ~ At this time, to facilitate the General Plan discussion the Consent Calendar items were moved forward for approval. CONSENT Upon MOTION by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commis- CALENDAR sinner Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve Consent item "A" as submitted. ~ * ~ ~ PUBLIC The public hearing for the proposed Rancho Cucamonga HEARING General Plan was opened. Commissioner Rempel gave a brief outline of how the meeting was to be conducted and the procedure to follow in submitting comments. Conununity Development Director, Jack Lam gave a brief background on the requirements of cities to have General Plans and the need for public hearings. He indicated that this was the first formal hearing and that others would most likely follow before the Plan is submitted to the City Council. During the public hearing process, the Draft EIR will be circulated for a period of 45 days to obtain public comments prior to certification of such EIR. General Plan Consultant, John Blayney, was introduced and also gave a brief description of the process and require- ments of a General Plan. Blayney also explained the "errata" sheet and gave further information regarding; the EIR. Blayney indicated that the copies of the EIR would be available when completed at local libraries and City Hall. At this point, Blayney explained that the adoption of the General Plan was not the adoption of a Zoning Ordi- nance, and that this procedure would have to be completed after the General Plan was adopted. He indicated that the City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance must be consistent as required by State law. Changes in the General Plan may occur over the years as conditions and policies of the City change. Blayney indicated that since most of the City west of Haven was already developed that the General Plan was more specific for this area. Since most of the City east of Haven was still undeveloped, the General Plan is much more general in nature as in the case of the reserve area. He also stated that the locations of schools, parks and shopping centers are general locations and are not specific. Mayor Jim Frost was then introduced and made a brief statement and presentation. At this point, the public was invited to come forward with their comments. The following is a listing of those items that were discussed. R F. S TTIRNTT AT. 1. Walt English, 7946 Lion, Rancho Cucamonga, 987-2686. Location: North of Foothill, west of Hellman, east of Vineyard, and south of the railroad tracks. The ..' PALNNING COMMISSION MINUTES -3- SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 homeowners in the immediate area opposed the high density residential that is reflected on the General Plan. This group wanted residential to see something more compatible with the surrounding area, such as a park. 2. Clark Vollintine, 5204 N. Sierra Road, San Bernardino, 883-5122. Location: Reserve area north of Etiwanda. He indicated that it was outside the City limits. and that. he would like to see it planned for residential uses rather than be left undesignated. 3. Vic Cherbak, 9926 Hillside Road, Rancho Cucamonga, 987-1890. Location: Hillside properties between Archibald and Milliken. He indicated that he wanted to be informed about what was going to be happening in this area at the time final decisions or zoning is to occur. He wanted to get together with Staff to discuss items that he will present later. 4. Bruce Uhl, 1113 Butternut, Irvine, 92715, 552-4491. Location: 65 acres next to Chaffey College. He indicated that the General Plan shows low density residential and that high density residential would be more compatible. 5. Arthur Bridge, 8715 Banyan, 987-2797. Location: East bank of the Cucamonga Creek, along the wash. He wanted to see that area zoned for 2 1/2 to 5 acre parcels rather than the ~ acre that it is presently planned for. 6. Ralph and Agatha Kleinman, 2500 N. Euclid, Upland, 982-5094. Location: Etiwanda Devore Freeway area at Baseline, north side of the street. They own most of this acreage and requested that it be planned for service commercial since the railroad and free- way make it difficult to develop residentially. In addition, they requested that their property to the north which 'is designated as windrow, be shown as low density residential. 7. Ron Nottingham, 9211 Archibald Avenue, 987-6376. Vanguard Companies - Location: North side of 19th Street, east of Archibald and west of the prolonga- tion of Ramona. The Vanguard Company requested mul- tiple residential as such a project was approved by the County last year. They still plan to develop this project when they get the go ahead from the City. 8. John D. Goldson, 19811 Vicenza Way, L.A. 90024 213-472-7500. Location: Reserve Area. He indi- cated that he owned over 500 acres north of Summit and west of the Freeway. He wanted some kind of . idea about what type of development would be planned for that area since it is not designated for any use. 9. M.B. Montgomery, 2460 Huntington Dr., San Marino, The Jones Co. 213-285-9711, Tract 9387, East side of Hermosa, south of 19th Street and north of Vic- toria. The General Plan shows this location as a future school site. He stated that their Tentative PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -4- SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 Tract Map is still on file with the City and that they are awaiting their sewer allocation. They requested that this area not be shown as a future school site. 10. Lloyd Dorsey, 7825 Almond St., 987-2337. Location: Hillside area - Northwest portion of Alta Loma. Requested that the hillside area be retained in its natural state. He felt '~ acre lots were too small that the density should be lower. In addition, he stated that the power lines and fault line was not accurately drawn on map. 11. Wayne Callaghan, 2029 Century Park East, L.A. 90067, Marlborough Development Corp. 213-553-5131. Indicated that they owned property above Foothill, east of Archi- bald which the General Plan indicated as a park site. He stated that part of this site is already used as commercial and that they did not want the remainder to be designated for a park. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the,park location is general which means that it could be anywhere in that general vicinity. 12. Nick Maricic, 1399 S. Rolling Knoll, Diamond Bar, 598-5253. 'He was concerned about the special study zone west of Haven. He requested that more precise densities be designated for this area and that he be notified of any specific meetings. 13. William Moorhous, 2223 Avenida de la Playa, La Jolla, 454-9162, Toups Corp. He was satisfied with the den- sity shown north of Almond and west of Sapphire. He disputed Art Bridge's comment that this area should be planned to a lower density than ~ acre. COMMERCIAL 1. Dr. Kleinman spoke again about this request for commercial uses on his property. He had his real estate agent also make a brief statement. Pat Uraas, 131 N. Granada Ct., Ontario. 2. Gary Mierau, Vanir Development Co., 290 N. "D" St. San Bernardino, 884-9477. Location: Northwest cor- ner 19th and Archibald and the northeast corner of 19th and Amethyst. Requested that these two loca- tions be designated as commercial rather than high density residential. 3. Mary Nimmergot, Opici Winery, 987-2710. Hermosa and Highland, 200' east of Hermosa. She stated that they have plans for expansion of the wine tasting room and possibly the development of a restaurant. The proposed General Plan indicates residential uses and they felt this will not allow for their expansions. They requested commercial in this area. 4. Wayne F. Nelson, 624 W. E1 Morado Ct., Ontario. S.M. Hoyt Co. 986-2721. Location: 7110 Archibald Ave. Indicated that this 5 acre piece is zoned com- mercial and construction is already underway on a commercial building. He_indicated that all the pro- perties around him are zoned for commercial usage. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -5- SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 5. John A. Laargo, 7111 Elmhurst Ave., 987-3018. Spoke in general about the mixed zoning. He suggested that areas designated as mixed uses within residential areas be required to heavily landscape the properties and locate the parking behind the buildings. 6. Tom Ursua, 759 N. Mountain, Upland. 985-0958. Southwest corner of Foothill and Vineyard. The General Plan shows high density residential and he requested a commercial designation. 7. Sidney Silliman, 6316 Haven Ave., 987-1737. Location: Northeast corner of Foothill and Haven. Would like to see this area held in open space. He did not like the idea of a regional shopping center. 8. Stephen D. Lucas, 9224 Foothill Blvd., 987-1732. Location: North side of Foothill Blvd., from Vine- yard to Hellman and south side of Foothill from Hellman to Malachite. The land is partially in commercial use and the General Plan shows high den- sity.residential. On the southeast corner of Foot- hill and Hellman the commercial designation seems to split a piece of property into two pieces. He would like to see commercial further back from the frontage on Foothill. 9. Joseph A. Filippi, P.O. Box 2, Mira Loma, 984-4514. Location: Northeast corner of Foothill and Vineyard (10 acres). Requested that the area not be changed from the commercial designation that the General Plan now reflects. 10. Terry Malone, 8986 Candlewood, 987-6997. Location: Vineyard and Orchard. Expressed his desire to see this area designated open space. 11. Scott Robinson, 12326 Summit, Etiwanda - Stated that he would like to see provisions made so that East Avenue will be able to handle traffic in the future as it is becoming a main street in that area. 12. Gil Rodriguez, 1078 Patrick St., Upland, 982-4589. Location: 9~ acres west of Vineyard on Foothill Blvd. Likes the commercial designation and would like to see it east of Vineyard as well. 13. Steve Aggazzotti, 11929 Foothill Blvd., 987-1657. Location: A parcel east of Rochester Ave. on Foot- hill Blvd. He would like to see commercial below Foothill, just below the Rochester track instead of, manufacturing right up to Foothill Blvd. He felt that this would provide better buffering. 14. Paul Corra, 7748 Val Vista, 985-3682. Location: North side of Baseline, just west of Beryl. Would like to see this area designated as mixed uses rather than residential. TNDIISTR T Ai. 1. Steve D. Lucas, 9224 Foothill Blvd. Location: "H" Street south fio Fourth Street and from Archi- bald to Haven. Submitted a letter from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce which he read for _' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -6- SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 the record. Requested a more general industrial' designation rather than minimum impact or major impact. 2. R.S: Brummett, 505 N. Daroca Ave., San Gabriel 213-281-7612. Location: 6th and Turner. This is designated for minimum impact but is already occupied by Frito-Lay. 3. Gerald L. Edwards, P.O. Box 2280, Pomona, 629-3023. Also referred to the same area that Lucas did. Indicated that a railroad spur ran down through the property and he did not. like the minimum classification. 4. Ron Nottingham, 9211 Archibald, Vanguard Companies. He indicated that they had the same concern as the Chamber of Commerce. 5. Arthur Warren, 636 S. 2nd Ave., Covina,213-331-2251. Warren Companies. Location: North side of 6th Street, east of Archibald. He is proposing a light industrial complex for this area. The General Plan shows it as residential, but it has been zoned M-1 for many years. He requested that this area be designated industrial to allow him to complete his project. 6. E. Fedwin, P.O. Box 326, Etiwanda, 989-1881. H & M Wholesale Lumber. Indicated that he was one of the first developments that appeared before the City. He is located north of Baseline, east of Rochester. He is currently zoned M-1 and he would like to see it remain that way. He doesn't want to be given a non-conforming status when the zoning is made to conform with the General Plan. Would like to be kept as M-1 and felt it made sense for his property since to the north is a flood con- trol reservoir, to the east the power lines and Day Creek, and to the south a wide strip of land for the future straightening out of Baseline. He requested that this area of the General Plan be shown as industrial. • CIRCULATION 1. Bernice DeGarmo, 200 W. Holt Blvd., Pomona, 623-3141. Spoke about the need for the Foothill Freeway. COMMUNITY FACILITIES 1. W. Rosalind Winters, 5614 Peridot Ave., 987-1825. Landscape designer for the City of Walnut. Indi- cated concern for the equestrian trails and for some method of maintaining and designing connec- tions between all the. trails to make them contagious for the benefit of the residents in the area. She volunteered her services to the City to help in setting up the trails. 2. Pamela Henry, 9012 Caballero Dr., 987-9474. Also expressed concern about the equestrian trails and their development north of the City. She would like to see it within our sphere of influence. ..:. , PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 -7- SEPTEMBER 13, 1978 Stephen Finch, 6102 Amethyst, 989-3183. Indi- ' Gated that he would like to see the City acquire more open space to preserve the rural atmosphere. 4. Harvey Levitt, 7070 Ramona. Indicated he did not like the location of the park on Ramona Avenue, as it was on his property and he was zoned R-3. He felt that parks would better serve the public if they were located in the eastern part:of the City. 5. Fran Freelove, 8979 Whirlaway Ct. Also expressed concern for the equestrian trails. 6. Brian Mulligan, 9045 Candlewood. 987-5823. Indi- cated his desire to see the City start addressing the need for rapid transit or mass transit within the City. OTHER 1. Richard Lewis, 2120 Vallejo Way, Upland. Location: North side of Foothill to the east of the Thomas Winery. Indicated that this area is designated high density but that he felt it would be more appropriately designated as commercial. He also expressed concern for the north side of Foothill from Haven to Rochester. He felt that a green belt was a good idea, but that the expense of upkeep to each home along this street would be great. 2. Rich Staneski, 6304 Haven. Questioned whether the City wanted to revolve and build itself around a regional shopping center. 3. Mr. Fedwin,from Etiwanda. Congratulated the Staff and Mr. Blayney for all the hard work they had done on the General Plan and the Com- mission for the opportunity to come forward with all the concerns the public had. Commissioner Dahl thanked all the residents for parti- cipating. ~ ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT Upon MOTION by Chairman Rempel, Commission requested that Staff notify all those people who had expressed residential concerns of the next Planning Commission meeting at which residential topics would be discussed. Upon MOTION by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Comb missioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of September 13, 1978 at 10:20 p.m. to the Special Studies Session on September 19,'1978 at 7:30 p.m, at City Hall. ~ * ~ ~ Respectfully submitted, Clara J. rillo, Secretary • ~~ ,; , :,~ AUGUST 23, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, August 23, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Jorge Garcia, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, and Peter Tolstoy. Absent: Commissioners Herman Rempel and Richard Dahl. APPROVAL OF Upon motion by Commissioner Laura Jones, MINUTES seconded by Commissioner Jorge Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of August 9, 1978 as submitted. PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE N0. 95-85 - Changing the zone from A-1 and C-1 to M-1 for property located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald - Request submitted by Harry Rinker, and DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 78-06 - The development of an industrial business center located on the southwest corner of Archibald and Arrow Route - Request submitted by Harry Rinker. Jack Lam presented the zone change staff report in detail, which is on file in the Planning Division. He stated that the proposed change is in conformance with the proposed General Plan and compatible to surrounding uses and suitable for the project site. Staff recommended approval of this zone change. Commissioner Garcia opened the public hearing for the zone. change. Henry Reiter, represented the applicant, Harry Rinker, and stated that they are proposing to develop a light industrial office complex. He further stated that their intentions are to gain Commission approval of Phase "A" of the development plans which will be presented tonight. Commissioner Garcia stated that since the zone change and site development plans are inter- related, that he would like to hear the staff report for the site plans prior to making a decision on the zone change. Since there were no other public comments, the public hearing for the zone change was closed. PLANNING MINUTES -2- AUGUST 23, 1978 Michael Vairin informed the Commissioners that the applicant had submitted a three (3) phase plan and was seeking approval of Phase "A" and was only seeking conceptual approval of Phases "B" and "C". He recommended approval of Director Review No. 78-06 based on the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Further, he recommended an amendment to condition number 3 which should include that "detailed building elevations should be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits." MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried, it was voted to approve and adopt Resolution No. 78-02 which recommends approval of Zone Change No. 95-85 to the City Council based on the findings contained therein. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried, it was voted to approve Director Review No. 78-06 based on the findings and conditions as follows: FINDINGS: 1. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. Landscaping and setbacks which are provided are compa- tible with the existing development in the surrounding area. 2. The site for the proposed use fronts on a street properly designed both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the sub- ject use. 3. There will not be an adverse effect on adjacent property. 4. That the project will not be objectionable or detrimental to existing uses permitted in the zone district. - 5. This project will not be contrary to the objectives nor the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Commission deems that the conditions listed in this report are the minimum necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. CONDITIONS: Planning: 1. That all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance be complied with. 2. That the site be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Division. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -3- AUGUST 23, 1978 , 3. That precise landscaping, irrigation plans, and detailed building elevations be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits and that landscaping be installed prior to final inspection by the City. 4. That a detailed trash enclosure plan be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. That the most westerly building of Phase "A" maintain a 25' setback from the pri- vate drive and that such revision be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. That the three (3) parking stalls located on the south side of the most westerly building of Phase "A" be eliminated. 7. That a coordinated sign program be designed for this development and be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to installation. 8. That this approval shall become null and void if Zone Change No. 95-85 is not approved and adopted by the City Council. Engineering: 9, Install curb, gutter, and drive approaches along the north boundary of the entire parcel. 10. Eliminate most easterly proposed drive entrance as shown on site plan. 11. Prior to issuance of building permits, a site grading plan shall be submitted for approval to the City Engineer. Drainage shall be designed to insure against the creation of damage or nuisance to adjacent properties. 12. Drainage over drive approaches shall be prohibited and sidewalk drains provided. PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-66 - Changing 7M-R3-T to A-1 fro property loca side of 19th Street approximate) Amethyst Street - Request submit D..l ...-. e..A CTR~4 TDDDl1VT U!1 OA- 0 of a nurse side of 1 the zone from ed on the north 400' west of 9th Street approx - Reauest submitt oca PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -4- AUGUST 23, 1978 Jack Lam stated that since the zone change and site approval are directly related that they will be presented concurrently. He presented the staff report in detail which is on file in the Planning Division. Mr. Lam reported that this request was submitted in an attempt to make the existing illegal use legal. He stated that by granting such a change would be inconsistent with the proposed General Plan and would create significant traffic problems. He asked Lloyd Hubbs to present the traffic implications. Lloyd Hubbs presented the traffic report. HeHe anformed the Commissioners that 19th Street is a State Highway and the major east-. west arterial which passes to the northern section of the City. He further stated that the Engineering Department recommended that access to 19th Street be limited to as few openings as possible and that no additional commercial type zoning be allowed. Commissioner Garcia opened the public hearing for comments from the applicant and other interested persons. Charles Althaus spoke on behalf of the applicant for the zone change. He stated that on the west side of the property there is a refrigeration business and on the south side it is zoned as A-1. This nursery does business on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and . Sunday in the days only. He further stated that on the east there is property that possibly may be acquired which is adjacent to the present property and, therefore, have traffic entering from Amethyst instead of 19th Street. Lloyd Hubbs stated that Amethyst would be a solution to the traffic problem but this would still be "spot zoning" and could cause future difficulty. Gary Hall, the west property owner, asked what he could do to protect himself if this is approved to a commercial area, especially about machinery noise. Commissioner Garcia informed Mr. Hall that if "spot zoning" is allowed some sort of provisions to protect the property owners would be address- ed. Robert Shibato, one of the owners of the property, clarified that the large equipment that had been on the property belonged to one of the partners and he is no longer affiliated with them. His business is offering plants from the grower to the public. Robert Shibato informed the Planning Commission that his entire family is in the plant business. They have a business located in Chiho where these PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -5- AUGUST 23, 1978 plants are grown and brought over to 19th Street and sold. He further informed the Commissioners that they do raise ground cover and bedding plants at the nursery. Commissioner Garcia closed the public hearing after no further comments from the public. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones, and unani- mously carried it was voted to deny Zone Change No. 94-66 and adopt Resolution No. 78-03 with an amendment to the resolution to include an additional finding which states "that the proposed zone change does not conform to the proposed General Plan." MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried it was voted to deny the request for Site Approval No. 94-66 based on improper zoning. ZONE CHANGE NO R-1 to C-2 for 97-82 - on north or Devon Street.- xequest submittea ny Jack Lam presented this report in detail, which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported that the proposed zone change is not consistent with the proposed General Plan and that such "spot zoning" practices cause land use compatibility and traffic problems. Further, several objections to this proposal were received from surrounding property owners. Commissioner Garcia opened the public hearing to allow the applicant and other interested persons speak on the project. Freda Shelley, the applicant and owner of the subject site located at 8239 Archibald, spoke on behalf of her project and explained the improvements that she would make to the project site if this zone change is approved. She stated that she plans to use the site as a real estate office and it could accommodate another office. Joseph Gotta spoke on behalf of Freda Shelley's project. He stated that he would like to have the area changed to a commercial zone because of the increased traffic noise. He further mentioned that people usually don't rent more than three (3) months at a time because of traffic noise. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -6- AUGUST 23, 1978 Charlotte Wyckoff also spoke on behalf of this project again endorsing the constant traffic noise. After no further public comments, Commissioner Garcia closed the public hearing. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried it was voted to deny the request for Zone Change No. 97-82 and adopt Resolution No. 78-04 with an amendment to the resolution to include an additional finding which states "that the proposal was not in conformance with the proposed General Plan." ZONE CHANGE NO. 87-73 - Changing the zone from R-1-T to C-1 for ten (10) acres of land locate on the southeast corner of Baseline and - Request submitted by Ontario Savings. Jack Lam stated that this item had been dis- cussed at the last Planning Commission. The applicant intends to establish administrative- professional uses on the site with some commercial uses, and a restaurant. At the last Planning Commission meeting the discussion revolved around the appropriateness of rezoning this particular property to C-1. The Commission felt that A-P zoning would be the most appro- priate zone; however, it was noted that a restaurant is not permitted in the A-P zone. The Commission felt that a restaurant use would be compatible to A-P uses and will be initiating an amendment to the A-P zone to allow a restaurant. Staff and the City Attorney have 'reviewed contract zoning and feel that this has not been accurately tested through the courts and the City should not be involved with contract zoning until much more research has been done. If they were to consider an A-P rezoning then staff would have to make provisions to amend the A-P zone which will take considerable period of time. Jack Lam further stated that the applicant has submitted a voluntary "Declaration of Restriction" for the subject property which will restrict the use of land to A-P type uses. However, the staff and the City Attorney had only received a draft of that copy on August 23, 1978 in the afternoon and have not had an opportunity to review this draft. Staff recommended that this beycontinued to the next Planning Commission meeting in order to formulate a recommendation on the "Declaration of Restriction." MOTION: Upon motion by seconded by Commissioner carried, it was voted to hearing to the September Commission meeting. Commissioner Garcia, Jones and unanimously continue this public 13, 1978 Planning PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -7- AUGUST 23, 1978 SITE APPROVAL NO. 91-66 - The develo - Request s Jack Lam presented the staff report in detail, which is on file in the Planning Division. He stated that there are serious traffic implications since 19th Street is a major and State highway. In addition, a commercial use in this location would not be compatible. He stated that the City Engineer will present the traffic implica- tions. Lloyd Hubbs, the City Engineer, presented the .traffic analysis for this project, which is on file in the Planning Division. Mr. Hubbs stated that a letter from CALTRANS was received which will require dedication and improvements that will put the structure very close to the street which would create safety problems and access problems. He stated that a use of this nature will create a significant amount of traffic in and out of the site which is not adequately designed. Commissioner Garcia opened the public hearing for public comments. Charlotte Wyckoff, the applicant, stated that day care centers are needed in residential areas. She further stated that she had signatures of 100 Rancho Cucamonga residents who approved of the project. Jack Lam clarified that staff did not mean to imply that these type of uses are not appropriate in residential areas. They are very appropriate in a residential area, but it must meet all the requirements in regards to safety and access. Commissioner Garcia closed the public hearing after no further comments from the audience. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to deny the application for Site Approval No. 91-66 based on the traffic implications on 19th Street. Further, that staff prepare policies on limited access for major arterials for Commission considera- tion. 1 - Chanaina the zone from A-1 to C-2 for property located at the west intersection of Foc nterstate 15 - Request s PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -8- AUGUST 23, 1978 Jack Lam presented the staff report in detail which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported that the application for this request was in error as building materials are not a permitted use in the C-2 zone. Since the General Plan proposes industrial use to the rear of the project site, staff recommended that an amendment to the application be made for a change of zone from A-1 to C-2 in the front portion of the property with a M-1 zoning on the rear portion of the subject property. Commissioner Garcia opened the public hearing for comments. William Longley, the applicant, was agreeable to the recommendations made by staff and to have this item continued to the September 13, 1978 Planning Commission meeting for the appropriate amendment. Joe Di Orio spoke in opposition to the building supply project at this particular location. He stated that they were currently in escrow regarding the property that is to the west of Mr. Longley's property. He further stated that he did not think that Mr. Longley's proposed building supply project was a compatible use for this intersection. He felt that a good quality design should occur at this site since it is located across from the proposed regional shopping center. Mr. Di Orio requrested that more information on the C-2 designation be obtained. Commissioner Garcia closed the public hearing after no further public comments. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried it was voted to continue this to the September 13, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. RECESS Chairman Garcia declared a short recess at 9:45 p.m. RECONVENED At 10:00 p.m. with all members present, ' .the Planning Commission reconvened. NEW BUSINESS APPEAL OF DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 96-72 - questing the expansion of Milano's Pizza staurant located in the Alta Loma shoppi center on the northwest corner or Arcninala and Baseline - Request submitted by Milano's Pizza. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -9- AUGUST 23, 1978 Jack Lam presented this report in detail which is on file in the Planning Division. He reported that this request has been solved and the applicant has no need of processing this appeal any further. Commissioner Tolstoy suggested that a rear entrance be provided to encourage customers to park in the back and, therefore, avoid traffic. He suggested that this rear entrance be designed in such a manner that it is inviting to the public. No motion was required on the part of the Planning Commission on this item. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 78-03 - Development of industrial buildings located on the south side of 9th Street, approximately 600' west of Hellman - Request .submitted by Michael Todd. Michael Vairin presented this staff report in detail which is on file in the Planning Division. This proposed plan .does conform to the proposed General Plan, and, therefore, staff recommended approval of the site plan subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Michael Todd, the applicant was not present. Staff had received no correspondence in regards to the proposed conditions. Commissioner Tolstoy inquired about the flood, control in that area. Lloyd Hubbs, our City Engineer, stated that this area is an area subject to periodic flooding and falls under the regulations of the Federal Flood Insurance Program. He further stated that they are working with the applicant to develop measures for protection. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that block wall screening is more appropriate behind Building "A" rather than the proposed chain link fencing. He recommended that it be included as a condition. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unani- mously carried, it was votee to approve the application subject to the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. Landscape and building setbacks which are provided are compatible with the existing development in the surrounding area. 2. That the site for the proposed use fronts on streets properly designed both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type of quantitive traffic generated by the subject use. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -10- AUGUST 23, 1978 3. There will be an adverse effect upon adjacent property. 4. This project will not be objectionable or detrimental to existing uses permitted in the zone district. 5. This project will not be in conflict with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Commission deems that the conditions in this report are the minimum necessary to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. CONDITIONS: 1. That all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance be complied with. 2. That the site be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Division. 3. That precise landscape and irrigation plans be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits and be installed prior to final inspection by the City. 4. That a detailed trash enclosure plan be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. That the warehouse door on the west side of Building "E" be relocated to the east side of Building "E". 6. That a copy of the recorded deed guaranteeing the reciprocal easement for Buildings "E" and "F" be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. If said easement is not obtained, then a revised site plan indicating adequate access shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission. 7. A coordinated sign program shall be design- ed for this development and submittal to the Planning Division for approval prior to installation. 8. All conditions of Minor Subdivision No. 78-0245 shall be adhered to in conjunction with the development of this.project. 9. In lieu of the chain link fencing in the rear of Building "A" that a masonry wall be constructed with view obstructing gates. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -11- AUGUST 23, 1978 DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 78-OS - Development of professional office building located on the northwest corner of Baseline and Amethyst - Request submitted by James Van AntwerA. Michael Vairin presented the staff report in detail which'is on file in the Planning Division. Staff recommended approval of this project based on the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Allen, an adjacent property owner, stated that he was satisfied with the proposed site. His only concern was that proper drainage exist between Mr. Van Antwerp's property and his. Commissioner Garcia stated that he would like to see more plant material on the unused portion of the property. Mr. Van Antwerp, the applicant, was pleased with all the cooperation he has received from staff on his project. Mr. Van Antwerp stated that fruit trees could be planted where Commissioner Garcia had indicated that more plant material be put in. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve Director Review No. 78-OS subject to the following findings and conditions: ~ ~ FINDINGS: 1. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. Land- scaping and setbacks which are provided are compatible with existing develop-. ment in the area. 2. The site for the proposed use fronts on a street properly designed both as to width and type of pavement to carry the traffic generated by the subject use. 3. There will not be an adverse affect upon adjacent property. 4. The project will not be objectionable or detrimental to existing uses permitted in the zoned district. 5. This project will not be contradictary to the objectives nor the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The Commission deems that the conditions of the report are a minimum necessary to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES r~ -12- AUGUST 23, 1978 CONDITIONS: 1. That all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance be complied with. 2. That the site be developed in accordance with the approved plans trhat are on file in the Planning Division. 3. That precise landscaping and irrigation plans be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits and be installed prior to occupancy. 4. That revised detail building elevation plans be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. That the trach enclosure be constructed of a 6' masonry wall with a view ob- structing gate compatible with the building. 6. A coordinated sign program shall be designed for this development and submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to installation. 7. A 20' corner cutoff shall be provided at Baseline and Amethyst. 8. 17' of property shall be dedicated along Baseline Avenue street frontage, to make Baseline Avenue 50' wide from centerline. 9. Prior to the development of the property, grading and drainage plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Hydraulic calcu- lations will be required to support the size and location of the drainage structure shown on the plans. 10. Sewer and water connections shall be coordinated with the Cucamonga County Water District prior to the development of this site. 11. A Title Report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to issu- ance of building permits. That curb, gutter, drive approaches, sidewalk, street trees, and A.C. match-up paving be provided along Baseline and Amethyst. 12. That plant material be planted along Roberds Street. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -13- AUGUST 23, 1978 MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 78-0301 - A subdivision of 16.7 acres into three (3) parcels for property located on the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Sixth Street - Request s tsrannan. Jack Lam presented this staff report in detail which is on file in the Planning Division. Jack Lam recommended approval of this minor subdivision based on the findings and conditions in the staff report. Mr. Andrew Barmakian, architect, represented the buyers of the property and stated that they would be interested in saving the Eucalyptus trees if they could be saved. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried it was voted to accept the request for this minor subdivision subject to the Findings and conditions as listed in the staff report: FINDINGS: 1. That the minor subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 3. That the design of the subdivision'is not likely to cause substantial environ- mental damage. 4. That the minor subdivision meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. CONDITIONS: Engineering Division: 1. An offer of dedication consisting of three (3) feet along Sixth Street of parcels 1, 2 and 3 be made. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, grading, drainage and street plans must be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. Hydraulic calculations will be required to support the sizing and location of drainage structures. 3. .Sewer and water plans shall be submitted and approved by the Cucamonga County Water District prior to development of the individual parcels. 4. A Parcel Map shall be recorded on the proposed land division in conformance with the provisions of City ordinances and the State Subdivision Map Act. U PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -14- AUGUST 23, 1978 ' 5. At the time of development of parcels 1, 2 and 3, curb, gutter, drive approaches, street trees and A.C. match-up paving shall be provided along the Sixth Street frontage. Foothill Fire District: 6. Fire flow will be~determined by the Foothill Fire District upon receipt of the following information: (a) Two (2) sets of plans, (b) Structures per acre; (density), (c) Location of tract, and (d) Type of roof covering. 7. Calculations indicating that the fire flow requirements will be met shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire District prior to plan approval. 8. Water mains and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with the re- quirements of the Cucamonga County Water District. 9. The Foothill Fire District shall be notified to witness an acceptance test of the water system prior to construc- tion of any building(s) or structure(s). 10. Fire hydrant assemblies shall be installed in accordance with require- ments of the Foothill Fire District. 11. Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to commencing construction of any building(s) or structure(s), and shall be approved wet barrel type only. 12. All streets and cul-de-sacs shall meet the minimum City of Rancho Cucamonga's standards. 13. Streets leading to cul-de-sacs or dead ends shall not exceed 600 feet in length. In the event these streets are redesigned in any manner, the 600 feet length shall be maintained on all resubmitted plans (tentative or final). The following requirements are necessary prior to completion or occupancy of the aforementioned development: 14. Trees existing on the property are to be topped to 30 feet and trimmed from the base up 15 feet. All dead limbs and leaves are to be removed. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -15- AUGUST 23, 1978 15. House or building address numbering shall be provided in accordance with San Bernardino%County Ordinance 2108, adopted by the City of Rancho Cuca- monga. 16. Any structure which incorporates fireplace chimneys shall have approved arresters installed. Planning Division: 17. All rules and regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be complied with. 18. Unless otherwise specified in this approval, any other alterations of the land must be approved by the Community Development Director. COMMUNICATIONS Jack Lam brought to the Commissioners' attention the two (2) letters on Tracts 9193 and 9262. They requested that the property owners go ahead and trim the Eucalyptus trees along certain portions of these tracts. Jack Lam further stated that the City has no way of requiring that these trees be trimmed at a particular time. Jack Lam informed that all the Planning Commission could do is acknowledge receipt of these letters. Jack Lam informed the Planning Commission that the City Council adopted an ordinance (Ordinance No. 19) to modify the director review on a multi-family development. Mr. Lam furnished the Commissioners with copies of this ordinance and stated that this ordinance will not be in affect until 30 days after approval. Jack Lam also informed the Planning Commissioners of the report he had prepared for the City Council meeting requesting additional staffing. Mr. Lam further informed the Planning Commissioners that at that meeting staff was authorized to immediately staff the Building and Safety functions for the City and that staff is now proceeding as.quitely as possible in taking over the Building and Safety func- tions from the County. The plans are to take over all the functions on September 15. ... PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -16- AUGUST 23, 1978 Jack Lam further informed the Planning Commission that we had hired Mr. Jerry Grant as our Building Official. Mr. Grant is currently the Superintendent of Building Regulations for the City of West Covina. He has over 20 years in building technology and he is widely respected by his peers throughout the State. Mr. Lam stated that he personally feels that we have gotten an outstanding person. Commissioner Jones complimented Mr. Lam on his presentation to the City Council regarding the additional staffing request, and further stated that she was very proud of how Mr. Lam made his presentation. Commissioner Jones wished Mr. Lam further luck on the-6th of September. Jack Lam also stated that he hopes to have a meeting in September to discuss future programs and priorities. At the meeting he also plans to present a new draft of the proposed sign ordinance. Commissioner Garcia spoke on behalf of the Planning Commission and extended 100 support to the Community Develop- ment Director when he goes to the next City Council meeting asking for additional manpower. He further suggested drafting a letter in support of this request. Jack Lam stated that he had one more item to present. It was in reference to the shopping center on the southwest corner of Carnelian and 19th. This center was approved and building permits issued prior to Ordinance 19, so the City did not have the opportunity to review the site plan or the requirements of that center. Jack Lam had a meeting that afternoon with the developers of that center including their attorney, engineer and architect. He suggested ways of improving the site plan to the applicants and they seemed to be agreeable. Jack Lam requested approval from the Planning Commissioners to work with the developers and improve this site plan. The Planning Commissioners fully supported Jack Lam on his suggestions for improving the site plan for this shopping center. ~_ _. .. .~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES i -17- AUGUST 23, 1978 The Planning Commissioners directed staff to proceed with the policy of limiting access on major arterials. Commissioner Garcia stated that they were very pleased with our legal counsel's performance and cooperation as a whole. He thanked him for keeping us out of trouble. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of August 23, 1978 at 11:00 p.m. to its next regularly scheduled meeting. Respectfully submitted, Diana Mansfield, Sec,zetary . ~ • • ~~ August 9, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, August 9, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Jorge Garcia, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, and Richard Dahl. Absent: Commissioners Herman Rempel and Peter Tolstoy. ~ ~ ~ APPROVAL OF Upon motion by Commissioner Laura Jones, seconded by MINUTES Commissioner Richard Dahl, and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of July 26, 1978. as submitted. ~ ~ ~ OLD BUSINESS INTERPRETATION FROD1 THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE on Ordinance No. 36 (moratorium). Ted Hopson from the City Attorney's office stated that all processing of general residential applications are prohibited by Ordinance No. 36 until the end of 1978. Consideration of "hardship" sewer allocations is also prohibited by the moratorium imposed by Ordinance No. 36. ~ : COMMUNICATIONS PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD FACILITY located on the sduth'side'of Arrow Route east of Archibald Avenue. Bill Holley, Director of Community Services, stated that this particular facility will offer both senior citizens' program, youth activities and multi faceted social service operations bringing in agencies such as IRS, Social Security, legal aid and others to serve the citizens of the community. Commissioner Garcia stated that the facility will be a great asset to our community. Commissioner Garcia asked if this facility would be managed by the County. Bill Holley replied that this facility will be managed by the City. Some of the services offered will be a continuation of County services, such as the senior citizens' nutrition program and will be funded by the County through Federal funding. OLD BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW of a tentative tract on 161 acres of land located west of Sapphire Street north of Almond Avenue to consist of 196 lots - R-1 20,000 and R-1-14 zone - Request submitted by J. Gregory Lawlor, Enterprises - Tentative Tract No. 10210. PLANNING COhA1ISSI0N MINUTES -2- August 9, 1978 ZONE CHANGE N0. 85-49 - Changing the zone from A-1-5 to R-1 20,000 for property located on the north side of Almond, approximately 385' east of Carnelian Street - ZONE CHANGE N0. 87-73 - Changing the zone from FP-2 to R-3, property located on the south side of Baseline, 775' west of Vineyard Avenue - Requested by Jerry Rogers. Jack Lam presented these reports, which are on file in tuning Division, and stated that all three (3) of these projects are residential projects and proposals which fall under the provisions of Ordinance No. 36. Therefore, lie recommended that these items be continued to the first Planning Commission meeting in January of 1979. Andrew Barmakian, architect, requested to comment on Zone Change No. 85-49. He indicated that their intentions are the construction of custom homes in the $200,000 - $300,000 bracket in an area that has been approved by the Water Quality Control Board for septic tanks. He felt that the project should not fall within the moratorium and that certain conditions could be placed on the project to allow them to be processed. Commissioner Garcia informed Andrew Barmakian that the Planning Commission does not have the authority to place such controls on this project because of Ordinance No. 36: MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue the environmental review of Tract No. 10210, Zone Change No. 85-49 and Zone Change No. 87-73 to the first Planning Commission meeting in January, 1979. ~ . ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS ZONE CHANGE N0. 87-73 - Changing the zone from R-1-T to C-1 for ten (10) acres of land located on the southeast corner of Baseline and Carnelian - Request submitted by Jack Lam presented the Staff report in detail, which is on file ih the Planning Division. He stated that this request is not suitable for the site and that an alternative zone such as AP would be more appropriate. Harry Crowell, owner of the property, stated that the area is definitely in need of professional office space. His intentions are to build a professional office complex:. He requested an amendment to the zone change request to C-1-T so that he would be able to have a restaurant which is not allowed under the AP zone. Andrew Barmakian, resident of Alta Loma, spoke in favor of this project. Commissioner Garcia stated that the T standard is not a method that the Planning Commission will utilize in order to control the use of land. Jack Lam informed the Planning Commission of two (2) alternative actions: 1 PLANNING COhllNISSION MINUTES - 3- August 9, 1978 1. Planning Commission can deny this zone change, thus allowing the applicant the right to appeal or reapply for a change to the AP zone with an amendment to the zone to permit restaurants; or, 2. The Planning Commission could continue the item to the August 23, 1978 meeting to allow time to investigate alternative solutions. Commissioner Dahl asked Staff to analyze the AP zone for amendments which would allow supportive uses. Alan Subt, a resident at 8480 Camino Sur, Cucamonga, stated that the City's General Plan should be adopted before approving such changes. Doug Hone, 7333 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, suggested that a service station be considered as a supportive use in the AP zone. Ted Hopson asked. the Planning Commission to indicate their idea of supportive uses. Commissioner Dahl stated that the following are typical supportive services to the AP zone in his opinion: 1. Stationery supplies, 2. Prescription pharmacy, 3. Postal instant press (quick copy) 4. Barber/beauty salon, 5. Restaurant, 6. Laboratory. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to August 23, 1978 and directed Staff to research alternative solutions. ~ ~ RECESS Chairman Garcia declared a short recess at 8:55 p.m. ~ + « RECONVENED At 9:05 p. m. with all members present, the Planning Commission reconvened. REVIEW OF LANDSCAPE AND TEMPORARY TRAILER PLANS for Mr. Robert Packer's development located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard east of Hellman Avenue - Site Approval No. 92-80. Mr. Vairin presented the Staff report in detail, which is on file in the Planning Division. He recommended approval of the landscape plans and trailer elevations based on the conditions listed in the Staff report. PLANNING CONllNISSION MINUTES -4- August 9, 1978 Robert Packer stated that he was concerned about the shrubs being planted to close together. He had been informed by several lanscapers that these shrubs will grow about 10' in diameter and that putting them to close would prohibit growth. Michael Vairin stated that the plants would not be over- crowded as they would grow in a more verticle nature and could be prunned. Logan Young, 8037 Montara, Cucamonga, stated that he was unable to attend the previous meetings but wanted to know how far along this project had gone. Commissioner Garcia informed Dlr. Young that at the last meeting the development of this site as a recreational vehicle center was approved by the Commission with conditions. One of them being the submission of landscaped plans to the Commission. Mr. Young stated that he wished Mr. Packer all the luck in the world even though he did not fully agree with the project. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to accept Mr. Packer's landscape plans and trailer elevations based upon the following conditions: 1. That 5 gallon bushes be planted 6 feet on center across the entire north property line and that minimum 15 gallon trees be planted 20 feet on center along the same strip. 2. That the unused portions of the site be planted with turf and irrigated. 3. That a minimum of 15 gallon trees be used for street trees. 4. That a minimum of 15 gallon trees be used throughout the site. S. That the flood control wall 'will be constructed with slump stone. 6. That the trailer units do not overhang on the adjacent property. ~ ~ ~ NE{Y BUSINESS REFERRAL OF DIRECTOR REVIEW for a sign request for the Von's/Thrifty's shopping center located on the northeast corner of Carnelian and 19th - Request submitted by Lewis Development Company - Director Review No. 87-65. Jack Lam presented this Staff report, which is on file in the Planning Division. Jack Lam recommended that the request for 36 square foot monument signs be denied as the original shopping center approval granted the use of two (2) 24 square foot signs. ,~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -S- August 9, 1978 Jay Self, a representative for T $ S Development asked for clarification regarding center identification signs as they had been informed by Mr. Stephens and the City Council that only center identification signs could be used. Mr. Lam requested that Staff be allowed to investigate whether approval was granted for a tenant sign or center identification sign. Commissioner Dahl commented that requests for monument signs should come to the Planning Commission for review and approval until a sign ordinance has been adopted. Jack Lam informed the Planning Commission that Staff has encouraged the use of monument signs for center identifi- cation rather than free standing tenant signs. Commissioner Dahl stated that if the tenant identification sign was approved by the County that such a sign may become nonconforming after the adoption of the City sign ordinance. Jack Lam stated that should Staff find that the actual approval was for a 24 square foot t.center identification sign, that the applicant will be required to redesign it according to the approved plans. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to deny the request for two (2) 36 square foot monument signs as they were originally approved by the County at a maximum of 24 square feet each. Further, the applicant should be aware that a tenant identification sign could become nonconforming after the adoption of the sign ordinance. APPEAL OF THE DIRECTOR'S decision on a minor subdivision ocated on the southwest corner of Victoria Avenue and East End Avenue - Request submitted by Alfredo C. Murillo - Minor Subdivision No. 78-0025. Jack Lam presented the Staff report, which is on file in the Planning Division. He stated that the moratorium prohibits processing of this application and suggested continuance to the first meeting in January, 1979. Clara Murillo, the applicant who resides at 13665 Monte Vista, Chino, asked if there was any kind of due process that has to be done on her appeal irregardless of the moratorium. Ted Hopson responded that the moratorium ordinance makes no distinction between original applications or appeals. Clara Murillo asked if there would be any recourse if she could appear before the City Council. Ted Hopson responded that she could appeal the continuance but that she would run into the same opinion from the City Attorney's office. Ron Pettway then requested clarification from the City Attorney on Section No.7 in Ordinance No. 36. C~ PLANNING CONA7ISSION MINUTES -7- August 9, 1978 Mr. Borreggine stated that there are 33 spaces in the back. Ted Hopson stated that Section 61.0219(b)1C of the Zoning Ordinance requires additional parking when a use is expanded or intensified. He stated that a variance would be the only method available to deviate from the parking requirements. Jack Lam informed the Planning Co~mnission and the applicants that a variance would be difficult since affirmative findings would have to be made by the Planning Commission which would probably not occur. Mr. Borreggine then suggested the possibility of limiting their seating capacity to 18 seats to be able to use the six (6) parking spaces vacated by Pomona Federal. , Mr. Lam did not oppose this request and suggested the possibility of striping additional parking spaces in the back. Chuck Bokay, resident of Rancho Cucamonga stated that there is more than enough room in the back for the additional spaces required. Mr. Bokay also stated that the parking lot has never been filled to its capacity. DfOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Jones, and unanimously carried it was voted to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of August 23, 1978 and to have the applicants work with the Staff to find additional parking within the center. REQUEST FOR A REVISION to a neighborhood shopping center located on southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian, C-1-T zone - Request submitte y T $ S Development, Inc. - c;re n.,.,r.,,,,,~ no. o~ ov Michael Vairin presented the Staff report in detail, a copy of that report is on file in the Planning Division. He recommended approval of the revision as long as three (3) additional parking spaces were provided. Ed Ormen, architect, agreed with the Staff recommendation. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the: request based .on the provision that three (3) additional parking spaces are provided in the center. COPR~IUNICATION Commissioner Dahl brought up the subject of temporary structures for churches in the community. He suggested that the temporary structures for churches be allowed for a period of two (2) years. Jack Lam informed the Planning Commission that the code presently permits temporary trailer for uses. He suggested that the Commission set policies in regards to time limits and extensions. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -8- August 9, 1978 Commissioner Garcia further requested that Staff prepare some policy recommendations for the August 23, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. + + , Commissioner Dahl commended the Staff on the preparation of the agendas. ~ ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 1978 at 11:10 p.m. to its next regularly scheduled meeting. ~ ~ ~ Respectfully submitted, t Diana Mal r nsfield, Secretary ~..~ ;- ~t • JULY 26, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CODMIISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, July 26, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Herman Rempel, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ~ ~ ~ ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Herman Rempel, Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy, and Richard Dahl. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon motion by Commissioner Peter Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Laura'Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of July 12, 1978 as submitted. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . PUBLIC HEARING The meeting was declared open for the following Public Hearings. SITE APPROVAL for the development of a recreational vehicle sales and repair center to be located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - C-2 Zone - Request submitted by Robert Packer -Index No. 92-80. Staff stated the applicant, Robert Packer, has obtained temporary access off of Foothill Boulevard. from the State, therefore, the application may be heard.- Mr: Lam had Mr, Vairin present the staff report. Michael Vairin presented the Staff report in detail, which is on file in the Planning Division. He stated that the Development Review Committee has reviewed the Initial Study and noise analysis. The noise analysis was submitted by the applicant per the request of Staff because of concerns from surrounding residences. The Development Review Committee recommended the adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the implementation of mitigating measures listed in the Staff report. He reported that Staff has thoroughly reviewed the project plans as submitted by the applicant and has found several areas of concern. The development plan indicated access from a 25' driveway on Foothill Boulevard. However, such access requires approval from the State Department of Transportation as Foothill Boulevard is a State highway. CALTRANS has indicated to Staff that access for this development has been approved on a temporary basis until alternative access can be provided as long as the driveway is of 35' minimum width. Staff recommended the the south and east sip 6e shifted 10' to the required 35' driveway on the south and east landscaped. access and parking be eliminated on les of the buildings. and the buildings east in ordei to accommodate the from Foothill Boulevard. The areas sides of the buildings will be fully Staff recommended relocation of the trash enclosure away from the street frontage as indicated on the Staff sketch plan. Staff also recommended the installation of 4' x 8' landscaped planters for approximately every 5 parking spaces within the parking lot. -Z- • He reported that elevations for buildings "A" and "B" indicate a Spanish motif with the roof and Spanish laced stucco but the applicant has not provided elevations of the proposed temporary trailers. Therefore, Staff recommended that such elevations be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to installation and that such trailers should be designed in a manner that portrays them as permanent buildings. Staff further recommended that wood slats be provided in the chain link fence around the temporary outdoor storage area. He stated that a public hearing notice was published in the Cucamonga Times on July 13, 1978 and notice was sent to adjacent property owners. No correspondence had been received as a result of this publication. However, prior to that publication,. the County Planning Department sent out referrals to adjacent owners and several negative comments were received. Such comments were related to potential noise from motorcycles and testing of vehicles within the surrounding neighborhoods. Staff felt that these concerns have been adequately covered through environmental review. Staff recommended approval of this development based on the findings and departmental conditions listed in .the Staff report. Further, Staff recommended issuance of a Negative Declaration tiased upon the implementation of the mitigating measures listed in the Staff report. Commissioner Garcia inquired about the applicant's plans for the north and west sections of the property shown on Exhibit "E". Michael Vairin responded that the applicant has proposed dense landscaping along the north property line as part of the mitigating measures with the remaining 45' and 30' on the west side to remain much as it is now. Commissioner Camcia also questioned the temporary access to the property. Michael Vairin reported that CALTRANS has taken a stand to try to eliminate as many access points as possible to Foothill Boulevard as it is a major arterial. CALTRANS realizes that the applicant has no other alternative at this time and is recommending .that temporary access be given until such time as adjacent properties develop or that the applicant can take access off of Hellman Avenue. Robert Packer stated that he was anxious to start on the installation of sewer and water lines as soon as possible since he must be in no later than September 15. Commissioner Tolstoy was concerned about the temporary structures being trailers and indicated that this could become an eyesore to the community.. Commissioner-Dahl was concerned with condition number 15 and asked Mr: 'Packer how he planned to enforce that the testing of vehicles be done only on major highways such as Foothill Boulevard. Robert Packer stated that he could control employee situation but the customer is a little different. He added that he could be strong in advising them where they may test. He further mentioned that he has been doing business in Upland for 8 years and has not had any problems so far. ' • -3- Commissioner Tolstoy inquired as to where the repair work was to be done,. Robert Packer informed the Commission that probably in the shed as a temporary facility. Mr. Packer submitted photo- graphs of the trailers to the Commissioners and Staff. Chairman Rempel asked if there were any comments from the audience. Oppositionsregarding this application for site approval were made by the following persons: 1. Steve Howard of 8036 Mantara, 2. George Goltz of 8043 Mantara, 3. Claire Howard of 8036 Mantara, 4. 14alter Sevier of 9243 Estacia. All of the above were concerned regarding the noise factor, the test riding of vehicles, the temporary buildings and the landscaping of this proposed site. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy it was voted to approve this development based on the following findings and conditions. Further, that a Negative Declaration be issued with mitigating measures proposed by Staff: FINDINGS: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape. 2. That the site has adequate access. 3. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property. 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the proposed General Plan. S. That the conditions listed in this report are necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. CONDITIONS: 1. That-all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance be complied with. 2. That a revised site plan be drawn in accordance with these conditions and be filed with the Planning Division for review and approval. 3. That all landscaped areas be irrigated, and that precise landscaping and irrigation plans be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the installation of any structures either permanent or temporary. Further, landscaping along the north property line and around the temporary trailer shall be installed within 30 days after occupancy of the trailer. 4. That the trash enclosure be located away from any street frontage and that it be enclosed with a 6' high masonry wall and view obstructing gates. A detail of said trash enclosure shall be included in the revised plans. S. That parking and access shall be eliminated on the east and south sides of Buildings "A" and "B" and that such area be fully landscaped. • -4- 6. That the access driveway from Foothill Boulevard shall be minimum of 3S' wide. 7. That 4' x 8' landscaped planters be installed for approx- imately every fifth parking stall within the parking lot. 8. That concrete bumper stops be installed in the parking spaces adjacent to the north sides of Buildings "A" and nBn 9. That detailed elevations for the temporary trailers be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of permits. Such elevations shall be designed in a manner that portrays the trailers as a permanent structure. In addition, the metal building shall be sound insulated. 10. That wood slats be installed in the chain link fence around the temporary outdoor storage area. 11. That the temporary trailers, shed, and outdoor storage area be removed within one (1) year from such approval and that the area be minimally landscaped. Landscape plan to include this area. 12. That a three (3) foot solid masonry wall be constructed along the entire length of the Hellman Avenue property line and continuing around the corner radius. 13. That all repair work related to the business be done within a completely enclosed building. 14. That a dense landscaped buffering strip be planted along the entire north property line. 15. That the testing of vehicles be done only on a major highway such as Foothill Boulevard. 16. That a detailed lighting plan be submitted to the Planning Division for review and-approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 17. That tree wells, street trees, and irrigation shall be provided within the public right-of-way according to City specifications. 18. That all roof mounted equipment be screened from view from all adjacent streets and properties. Such screening to be approved by the Planning Division. 19. That the applicant install all fire protection improve- ments as may be required by the Foothill Fire District. 20. That all provisions of the Uniform Building Code are complied with. 21. That a cash payment security must be provided to cover the cost of curb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage pro- tection on the Hellman Avenue frontage to the site. 22. All grading, drainage, and paving plans shall be drawn according to specifications set by the City Engineer. Further, such plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to any installation of structures, whether temporary or permanent. 23. Precise landscaping and irrigation plans and exterior elevations of the trailer shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the installation of any structures. -s- r i MOTION was carried and approved by Commissioners Jones, Rempel, Tolstoy and Dahl; Commissioner Garcia opposing. APPEAL of a minor subdivision to divide 1.15 acres of land located on the west side of Hellman Avenue south of Base Line into 2 parcels - R-1 Zone - Request submitted by Stephen Lucas for Herbert Vaughan - Index No. 78-0199. Jack Lam stated that the applicant had withdrawn the application and that Staff will refund the applicant's fee. No motion was required by the Planning Commission. RECESS Chairman RemPe.l declared a short recess at 8:45 p.m. RECONVENED At 8:55 p. m. with all members present, the Planning Commission reconvened. ,: OLD BUSINESS Jack Lam stated that the following zone changes are ones that were submitted to the County and transferred to the City. He stated that this meeting is intended to determine the processing of these zone changes. 1. ZONE CHANGE N0: 85-49 - Changing the zone from A-1-5 to R-1 20,000 for property located on the north side of Almond approximately 385' east of Carnelian Street - Requested by Gertrude Hartman. 2. ZONE CHANGE N0: 87-73 - Changing the zone from FP-2 to R-3 for property located on the south side of Baseline 775' west of Vineyard Avenue - Requested by Jerry Rogers. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 3. ZONE CHANGE NO: 94-66 - Changing the zone from (7000) R-1-T to A-1 for property located on the north side of 19th Street about 385' west of Amethyst - Requested by Kenneth Byler. 4. ZONE CHANGE N0: 97-82 - Changing the zone from R-1 to C-2 for property located on the east side of Archibald about 150'. north of Devon Street - Requested by Freda Shelley. S. ZONE CHANGE'N0: 95=85 - Changing the zone from A-1 and C-1 to M-1 for property located on the south side of Arrow Route about 128' west of Archibald - Requested by .Harry Rinker. _ .._ 6. ZONE CHANGE N0: 123=81 - Changing the zone from A-1 to C-2 for property located at the southwest intersection of Footfiill Boulevard and Interstate 15 - Requested by William Longley. ,Jack Lam reviewed the Staff report in detail which is on file.in.the-Planning Division.. -He.recommended that Zone Change No. 85=49 and Zohe Change No: 87=73 be continued to - t e next meeting to allow t e City Attorney to determine the status of the projects in lieu of the moratorium. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Rempel and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue Zone Change No. 85-49 and Zone Change No. 87-73 to the next Planning Commission meeting on August 9, 1978 for legal interpretation of Ordinance No. 36. - - - ----- - _~_ ~ , -- -- - -- --- Jack Lam further stated that Zone Change Nos. 94-66, 97-82, 95-85, and 123-81 can be broug't be ore t e Planning Commission for public hearings, and-that these items should be processed in the priority according to the submittal date. Planning Commission instructed Staff to begin final processing of the applications. D7INOR SUBDIVISION to create an industrial tract of 6 lots located on the south side of 9th Street approximately 600 feet west of Hellman Avenue - M-R Zone - Application submitted by Michael Todd - Index No. 78-02451. Jack Lam stated that the applicant is requesting approval to create 6 free standing industrial buildings on individual lots. The proposal is consistent with the existing San Bernardino County recommendations and findings be retained. Mr. Michael Todd requested that item number 26 be changed to a Certificate of Occupancy instead of bonds. Jack Lam concurred with the applicant on his request for a Certificate of Occupancy. MOTION: Upon. motion by Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Commissioner Jdhes, and unanimously carried it was voted _ to approve Mihbr Subdivision No. 78-0245 based upon the following findings and conditions. Further, that a Negative Declaration be issued and recorded. " FINDINGS: 1. The proposed project will be consistent with the adopted City Community General Plans, both textual and mapped. 2. Adequate service capacity exists, has been reserved, or will be available at such time as the project is completed or within a reasonable acceptable time frame for fire protection, drainage and circulation. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of density and development. 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improve- ment are hot likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish and wildlife and their habitat. S. The design of the subdivision or type of proposed improvement are not likely to cause serious public fiealth problems or cause threat to life and property from a wildfire conflagration. 6. The proposed subdivision; its design, density and type of development and improvements conform to the condi- tions imposed by the County Subdivision chapter, the regulations of the County Zoning chapter and the regu- lations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law. CONDITIONS: 1. That a Negative Declaration be adopted and that the Secretary be instructed to file a Notice of Determination. 2. That the Planning Commission approve Minor Subdivision W78=0245-I, subject to the attached conditions. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance with requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, and in accordance with plans approved by the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services and the governing fire protection authority. -~- 2. Easements and improvements shall be provided and drainage coordinated in accordance with the standards and requirements of the County of San Bernardino and the County Planning Commission. 3. 6Yhere a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the improvement: A. The domestic water plan. and/or sewer plan shall be reviewed by a civil engineer, registered in the State of California and said engineer shall determine the amount of bond necessary to install the improve- ments. This amount plus ten percent shall be posted with the County of San Bernardino. B. The presently required certificates on water maps for the water company and engineer must still be placed on the map. In addition, a statement shall be transmitted to the Public Health Department signed 6y the Registered civil engineer for the water purveyor stating that the amount of bond recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the improvement. C. Further, prior to release of the bond for the improvement, the engineer for the subdivider or the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed statement confirming that the improvement has been installed according to the approved plans and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and County laws pertaining to such improvement. It is the developer's responsibility that such signed statement is filed with the County Department of Environmental Health Services. D. I'n cases where the water agency or sewering agency is a governmental subdivision, prior to final recording of the tract map, the governmental agency shall submit a statement directed to the County stating that the improvement has been installed according to the approved plans or stating that the bond in the amount of 110 percent of the cost of installation o£-the improvement has been placed with the agency. 4. A commitment shall be obtained, in writing, from the sewering agency. Said commitment to indicate that the agency lias the capacity to furnish said sewer service to the subject project, and that all necessary arrange- ments have been made with said agency to supply such services. A copy of the commitment to be filed with the Planning Department. " STREET, GRADING AND'DRAI'NAGE REQUIREMENTS: County Transportation'Department: S. Paving, curbs and gutters shall be installed on Ninth Street and offer of dedication street. Plans for all improvements must be approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Engineer prior to installation of said improve- ments. A cash deposit or bond may be placed with the City Transportation Department to fulfill thi\ requirement. 6. Thirty-three (33) foot offer of dedication required along Ninth Street. 7. Sixty (60) foot offer of dedication required along offer of dedication street. 8. Twenty (20) foot radius of return offer of dedication required for rounding the corner of Ninth Street. -8- 9. One (1) foot non-access strip is required at terminus of offer of dedication street as shown on plat map. Flood Protection Requirements: 10. Structural block walls, earth berms or surfaced channels shall be provided along the boundaries as required. 11. The portion of lots adjacent to the access street shall be elevated above the top of the curb of the access street to reduce possibility of overflow entering the lots. 12. Adequate provisions shall be made for handling on-site drainage and dewatering the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream property. 13. Precise flood protection measures shall be designed to protect against inundation by a 100 year storm and shall conform to the provisions of the Federal Flood Insurance Program protection measure and shall be based on a hydrological study prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and will be subject to approval of the City Engineer. County Surveyor: 14. Upon completion of all other conditions, a Parcel Map of the proposed division shall be recorded with the County Recorder pursuant to provisions of the State Map Act. (Note: This map must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or a registered civil engineer.) An advance copy of the Parcel Map may be submitted to the County Surveyor to expedite checking, but the County Surveyor will not accept the linen for presentation to the County Recorder for filing until notified by the Planning Director that your D1inor Subdivision application is in order for final approval. 15. The Parcel Map is required due to insufficient survey data recorded with~.the County of San Bernardino. * In addition to the Street and Drainage requirements, other "on-site" or "off-site" improvements may be required which. cannot be determined from tentative plans and would have to be determined after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to the County Transportation Department. .. .... .... .... .... .... .. County Fire Warden: 16. Fire flow will be determined by this department upon receipt of the following information: A. Two (2) sets of plans, B. Type of roof covering, C, Number of stories. 17. Calculations indicating that the fire flow requirement will Be met shall be submitted to this department prior to plan approval. 18. Water mains and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District. 19. This department shall be notified to witness an acceptance test of the water system prior to construction of any tiuilding(s) or structure(s). -9- • 20. Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to commencing construction of any building(s) or structure(s), and shall be approved wet barrel type only. 21. All streets and cul-de-sacs shall meet the minimum San Bernardino County Transportation Department standards. 22. Streets leading to cul-de-sacs or dead ends shall nor exceed 600 feet in length. In the event these streets are redesigned in any manner, the 600 foot length shall be maintained on all re-submitted plans (tentative or final). County Planning Department: 23. Street lighting shall be provided throughout the tract including all peripheral streets. 24. Utility lines shall be placed underground in accordance with the requirements of County Ordinance No. 2041. 25. Existing zoning is MR. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, all required walls and landscaping shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their completion. Bonds shall be posted with the Planning Division. 27. Four (4) copies of a final Grading and Lanscaping Plan shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits when phasing, where finished perimeter slopes are proposed adjacent to existing development, or when graded slopes exceed five (5) feet in vertical height. 28. Graded slopes shall be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height of 30 feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of slopes shall be a minimum of one half the slope height. 29. Graded slopes shall be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours and developed with a minimum radius at intersecting horizontal planes of two (2) feet, (measured one (1) foot from the top or toe of slope) and a maximum horizontal length of two hundred (200) feet. 30. The surface of all cut slopes more than five (5) feet in height and .fill slopes more than three (3) feet in height shall be protected against damage by erosion by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10% 15 gal.; 400 5 gal.; SO% 1 gal. Shrubs 20% 5 gal.; 80% 1 gal.; Ground cover 1000 coverage. 31. Three (3) copies of a Landscaping Plan reflecting the above requirements and placement of street trees (if required) shall be submitted for Planning Director Review and approval. 32. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is officially assumed by a County Service Area. , ~ ~ - ~~ • -10- a 33. All irrigation systems where required shall be designed on an individual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an approved manner. 34. Prior to recordation of the.parcel map, four (4) copies of a Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. 35. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a letter from the serving water and sewer agency shall be submitted certifying that capacity for Minor Subdivision 78-0245-I has been reserved for a minimum period of one (1) year. 36. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property, the applicant must obtain approval of a Site Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW of a tentative tract on 161 acres located west of Sapphire Street north of Almond Avenue to consist of 196 lots - R-1 20,000 and R-1-14 Zone - Submitted by J. Gregory Lawlor, Enterprises - Tentative Tract No. 10210. Jack Lam recommended that the Planning Commission continue this item to the meeting of August 9, 1978 to allow the applicant time to compile and present the revised tentative tract map to the Planning Commission. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to August 9, 1978. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ RECOMMENDATION on "Hardship" Sewer Allocations. Jack Lam stated that since the July 12, 1978 Planning Commission meeting, new developments have occurred which changed the Planning Commission's perspective on the whole "hardship" sewer issue. Since the Council has imposed a moratorium until after January 1, 1979 and that sewer capacity will be available soon, there is no longer a need to consider "hardship" cases as they will be .able to develop once the moratorium is lifted. .... .. . Comments from Mr. Jbe Di Orio were made. He thought that allocations should be made in August instead of January, 1979. The Planning Commission concurred with Staff's analysis. • x ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ :t + NEW BUSINESS REFERRAL of Director Review for the development of a profes- sional office complex to be located on the southeast corner of Hellman and Baseline Avenue - A-P Zone - Submitted by Doug Hone. Jack Lam requested that the Planning Commission grant the continuance for the review-of the review of this project to August 23, 1978 meeting. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy; seconded by Commissioner 'Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of August 23, 1978. : ~ x ~ x ~ :t :t ~ x COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Garcia suggested that a special study session be set up to measure growth.-and progress in Rancho Cucamonga. Commissioner Rempel suggested that a tentative date for September 19, 1978 at 7:30 p.m, be set to meet and discuss this. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to,adjourn th_e Planning Commission meeting of July 26, 1978 at 11:00 p.m. to its next regularly scheduled meeting. Respectfully submitted, i Dian Mansfield, Secreta J~ JULY 12, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community ..Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, July 12, 1978. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p. m. by Chairman Herman Rempel, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Herman Rempel, Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, and Peter Tolstoy. Absent: Commissioner Richard Dahl. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Upon motion by Tolstoy., seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it ,was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of June.28, 1978 as submitted. ANNOUNCEMENT Community Director, Jack Lam, introduced the .- Community Development secretary, Diana Mansfield: OLD BUSINESS The meeting was declared open for the following Old Business items. MINOR SUBDIVISION to create an industrial tract of 6 lots located on the south side of 9th Street approximately 200 feet west of Hellman Avenue - M-R Zone - Application submitted by Michael Todd - Index No.. 78-0245-I. Before going into discussion on the above item, Jack Lam asked the Commission to bear with the staff for the next couple of meetings until we are able to obtain our own audio visual equipment. Also, he stated that we have received n gr.cat deal of applications that were pending from the County and we are trying to process these applications on an as submitted basis. Because of the short time involved on many of these reviews, staff may be in a position of referring certain pending applications to. the Planning Commission in order to meet some of the statutory time limits on some of the Director Reviews. He also stated that in the future some of these items will be handled by the staff and placed on the consent calendar. Jack Lam stated that this item was on the agenda of June 14, 1978 at which time the Planning Commission had reviewed this project. The Commission requested that the applicant continue review of this project until such time the applicant could clarify the recommendations from the Flood Control District. Staff has contacted the applicant and the applicant has submitted a letter to the City requesting that the Planning Commission continue review of this item to July 26, 1978 to allow adequate time Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 12, 1978 for the City Engineer to assess the Flood Control District's recommendations. The applicant, Michael Todd, was not present at this meeting. Staff indicated July 26, 1978 was not enough time, staff will come back to the Planning. Commission and ask for further continuance. MOTION: It was moved by Tolstoy and seconded by Jones and unanimously carried ,to continue the review of this item to July 26, 1978 in order to allow adequate time for the City Engineer to assess the Flood Control District's recommendations. ENVIRONt~fENTAL REVIEW of a tentative tract on 161 acres located west of Sapphire Street north of Almond Avenue to consist of 196 lots - R-1 20,000 and R-1-14 Zone - Application submitted by J. Gregory Lawlor, Enterprises - Tentative Tract No. 10210. Jack Lam reported that this application was reviewed~by the Planning Commission at its. meeting of June 14, 1978. At which time, the Commission expressed a further desire for additional input from the Foothill Fire District and the National Forest Service.' Therefore, the Commission unanimously continued ti~is project until the present. meeting to consider the requested information. However, this information is currently not available. Therefore, TOUPS Corporation has submitted a letter requesting continuation of this item until July 26, 1978. Staff reco~mnended to the Planning Commission that this item be continued to July 26, 1978. TOUPS Corporation did not have a representative. present at this meeting. MOTION: It was moved by Jones, seconded by Garcia, and unanimously carried to continue .review of this item until July 26, 1978 for TOUPS Corporation to submit the appropriate material. RECOMMENDATION on Hardship. Sewer Allocations. Jack Lam opened this item stating that this whole matter arose as a result of the ordinance and resolutions adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May lfi, 1977 establishing some orderly process by which sewer allocations can be made. At that time, the Cucamonga Watei District was allocated 3,458 building permits. Of these 3,458 units the. County has recognized 3,158 building permits for tract development, 150 units for individual single family homes and 150 units for "hardship" cases. When this allocation by the County was established, "hardship" was not defined nor was there any ~.. ; Planning Commission Minutes ~~ -3- July 12, 1978 criteria established for the selection of "hardship" projects. Jack Lam corrected one item in the staff report, that is as of today there exists 146 units left under the "hardship".category. The "hardship" category was never recognized by the Cucamonga County Water District, and communication from Lloyd Michaels of the Cucamonga County Water District to the City Manager exists expressing the same. The Cucamonga .County Water District has expressed at various meetings that they would not recognize the issue of "hardship" because of the difficulty in establishing what exactly is a "hardship." At the present time all the 3,158 building permits have been issued and there exists no further sewer allocations until we receive new allocations. from Chino Basin. At present, of the 150 units for the individual single family builder, there are 112 units left and under "hardship" allocation there are 146 units. Staff feels that the issue of "hardship" is a very sensitive one. It is very difficult to establish criteria for the allocation of hardship and staff feels that the remaining number of units under this "hardship" allocation be either added with the allocation for the single builder (112 units remaining) or they should be grouped with any new allocation that the City will receive in the future. Tlie third alternative is to try and recognize the "hardship" cases and allocate them on "hardship" bases; however, we will probably have new sewer allocations before the City can ever determine what constituted a "hardship.". Staff recommends that the Planning.Commission consider all these factors and recommend to the City Council that the "hardship" allocation request not be approved and that the remaining 112 units of the individual lot allocations be retained for their original purpose and that the remaining 146 units of "hardship" allocations be thrown in with any new sewer allocations that the Cucamonga County Water District will receive and that these particular applications will be evaluated under any new criteria the City would develop for any future new allocations. Discussion: Commissioner Garcia felt that this would not be solving the problem at all and that by postponing this it would continue into next year. He recommended that some kind of management system be formulated to determine who can build in our community in order to avoid any legal ramifications in reference to the length of time lapse on processing of these pending applications. •i ~• Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 12, 1978 Ted Hopson from.the City Attorney's office was not prepared to give a comment on this but did state .that he would do some. legal research. Commissioner Jones suggested that the water department take .care of the sewer allocations until such time as we have something set up. Jack Lam stated that the City should determine how the allocations be made and how the community should develop. Lloyd Michaels, General Manager of the. Cucamonga County Water District, said that commercial/ industrial will be unaffected up to 5,000 gallons a day. Anything over 5,000 gallons a day must be referred to the Technical Committee for advice as to whether it is an acceptable discharge. Lloyd Michaels anticipates that before the middle 'of August new sewer alloca- tions will be available. The discussion was then turned over to the floor and comments were made by: Pat Kapp, from J. P. Kapp and Associates, Consulting Engineers, 501 Park Center, Santa Ana, California, represneting Tract 9472; Blake Johnson,~from .Trinity Development Company; Sydney W. Jones, from Clifton 5. Jones, Jr. Inc., who suggested presentation from developers; Travis Manning, representing.rtanning Construction; Pete Peterson from Chevron Construction; Mike Thompson, a farmer from Jackson Farms, 2526 Wildrose Lane who spoke on behalf of Trinity Development; John Ashcard from J. Anthony Development. All of the above representatives all generally stated that they wished the remaining allocations be made some way. The representative from Clifton S. Jones, Jr. Inc., Sydney W. Jones suggested the developers each make a presentation on their individual developments stating their "hardship" cases. MOTION: It was moved by Garcia, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried to continue Item C until July 26, .1978 and instructed the City Attorney to research the legal ramifications of allocating-the remaining units. RECESS RECONVENED NEW BUSINESS Chairman Rempel declared a short recess at 8:40 p.m.' At 8:55 p. m. with all members previously present, the Planning-Commission reconvened. REFERRAL of Director Review for_the development of 2.07 acres of. land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 450' west of Archibald as a retail shopping center - C-1 and C-2 Zone - Application submitted by Moore Development Company - Index No. 95-81. Jack Lam stated this item was referred to the Planning Commission in order to meet the statutory time provisions. This particular project after review had significant problems. Staff has contacted the applicant and discussed the problems concerning the site plan and design. The applicant, therefore, submitted a letter withdrawing the application and will resuhmit a new application at a later date. .Planning Commission Plinutes -5- July 12, 1978 REFERRAL of Director Review for two building identification sign and logos for the proposed Pioneer Chicken located on .the southwest corner of 19th Street at Carnelian - C-1 Zone - Application submitted by Heath and Company - Index Na. 86-67. . Sack Lam indicated that under .Ordinance 19, the Planning Director is authorized to review all sign approvals in .the commercial areas in the City. The requirements for the submittal on the sign review are an accurate plot plan showing the location and relationship to the buildings and the location of the sign, size and so forth as well as exhibit material in regards to the exact design of the .sign. In reviewing this particular application, the plot plan submitted is not the plot plan which building permits were issued. Furthermore., the Building and Safety Division has not. been able to locate a copy of the correct plot plan. Staff, therefore, recommended the sign request be denied on the basis of inadequate submittal and that the applicant would have the choice of resubmitting the sign request at which time staff could sit down with the applicant and review the proposal in more detail with accurate information. Ted Hopson from the City Attorney's office further stated that the Planning Commission may deny the application if the architectural and general appearance of the commercial building is not ih keeping with the character of the neighborhood, or if those factors will be detrimental, to the public health, safety or general welfare of the community. Commissioner Garcia informed the applicant that the scale in relationship to the building was out of proportion and suggested a less bold design be utilized. - MOTION: It was moved by Jones and seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried to deny this sign request based upon the following findings: 1. That the sign proposal is not compatible with the design and character .of the area. 2. The approval of this proposal would be detrimental to the .public health, safety and the general welfare of the community. 3• The submittal material was inadequate. Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 12, 1978 COPipfiJNICATIONS Chairman Rempel asked for .any communications from the audience. Ralph strain of 7403 Archibald indicated that both he and his wife were greatly concerned ' about the grocery store that is scheduled to be adjacent to their bedroom windows in a house which they have occupied for 16 years. He requested that they be ihformed on what plans are in the making for the property next door in order. that they can defend their property. Chairman. Rempel stated that no plot plan has been approved on the property described above; only the zoning has been approved. Dough Hone indicated that a site plan has been approved but the one that Ralph Strain has is incorrect. Jack Lam informed the Planning Commission that under Ordinance 19, the County Planning Director (Tommy Stephens) did the Director Reviews and approved them. Commissioner Tolsto stated that he was not ~. aware that this plan had been approved and thought that this project was coming before the Planning Commission. Chairman Rempel suggested that Pfr. Hone and Mr. Strain get together to review the approved plans. Both persons indicated that this was a good idea and that it would be done. Director Review of R-3 Development. Jack Lam said that the Planning Commissioners leave expressed concerns about multi family development in the .City. Their concern is. that there are no opportunities for Director Review or Planning Commission Review on multi family projects. Now, submittal of the projects go to Building and Safety for plan checking and issuance of permits. Staff asked the Planning Commission .if it would like to see some kind of Director Review process for multi family development. If so, staff would look into an amendment to Ordinance 19 to include review of multi family development under the same requirements of . Director Review as the commercial and industrial uses. Commissioner Garcia agreed with this and definitely stated multi family should have some sort of review in all aspects. MOTION: It was moved by -Jones and seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried that staff prepare an amendment to Ordinance 19 to include multi family development in R-3 and R-2 and' mobile home parks with the exclusion of singular duplex. `= Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 12, 1978 Pending Planning Applications. Jack Lam again informed the Planning Commission. that staff is under great pressure right now since the County turned over 200 pending planning applications. He asked the Planning Commission to bear with the staff during this. time of transition. Commissioner Garcia asked how the Planning Commission and staff could develop some guidelines for the structures going up, especially industrial? Jack Lam reported that at present the current Zoning Ordinance does provide for this but once we adopt our own Zoning Ordinance we can have such guidelines incorporated into this ordinance. In the meantime we can use Ordinance 19 and have large industrial projects referred to the Planning Commission. A discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of establishing some sort of architectural review process. Mr. 7.am said he would provide a future report to the Planning Commission regarding this matter. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of. July 12, 1978 at 9:55 p. m. to its next regularly schedule meeting. Respectfully submitted, Diana Ptansf: s:~. Jure 28, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION PIINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held at the Community Service Building, .9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, June 28, 1978. 1!•ieeting~was called to order at 7:15 .p. m, by Chairman Herman Rempel, who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Fresent: Commissioners Hermen Rempel, Laura Jones, Jorge Garcia, and Peter Tolstoy. Absent: Commissioner Richard Dahl APPROVAL OF Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, iIINUTES it was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of June 14, 1978 as submitted. ANNOUNCEPIENTS Chairman Rempel .introduced the Community Development Director, Jack Lam and the temporary secretary, Clara Murillo. Mr. Lam intro- duced the staff, Michael Vairin and Bill Hofman. Mr. Lam reviewed the memo he sent to the Commissioners in regards to the transition of planning services from the County. He stated that he is looking fowardto preparing a good planning pro- gram with the Commission. Chairman Rempel made a request for less smoking and asked for a no smoking ruling entirely. Smoking to be only during recesses or outside of the center. There were no objections: PUBLIC HEARING The meeting was declared open for the following public hearing and the procedure and method of delivery was explained to the . public. LOCATION & DEVELOPPfENT PLAN REVIEW, INDEX No. W96-89 W/S of Archibald, APPROX. 281' S/o 8th St. (Barbara Salyer) Pir. Tommy Stephens, from the County Planning Department, reported that the applicant is requesting the approval to remodel an abandoned school site for operation of a private school in Sept- ember. T'he existing zoning is MR (Restricted Manuf.). This school would be for grades up to the eighth. The site is located on the west side of Archibald, 281 ft. south of Eighth St. To the north is residential with existing sing.Le family houses and tri-plexes, uses to the east are also single family homes. There is currently a proposal, just south of the site, for an industrial use. Staff initially recommended that a block wall be installed along the north and south property lines. However, after further analy- sis, Staff recommends that a wall along the south property line will. be adequate since adjacent uses to the north are residential. Said wall will be provided by the proposed industrial use on the south property line. Further, Staff recommends that finding ll4 be 'changed to indicate that the facility will connect to the sewer system rattier than using a septic tank. These conditions have been reviewed with the applicant and she has agreed to them. Staff recommended approval based on the findings and conditions listed in the staff report including suggested .changes. ~~~ Planning Commission PSinutes -2- June 28, 1978 Chairman Rempel declared the hearing open. Simone Payne appeared on behalf of applicant Salyer, partner in this development. She addressed the question of noise and indicated that they would be planting the proper shrubbery, as well as providing insulation and air-conditioning as required. Also indicated that they feel they are an asset to the commun- ity and will try to provide quality and high standards within their development. There being no further testimony, Chairman Rempel declared the hearing closed.. Discussion: Commissioner Tolstoy requested information on the zoning on the west side of the school. Tommy Stephens indicated that it is zoned industrial. He ind- - icated that Staff, has moved the far west building closer to the school facility. Mr. Stephens indicated that there would be - ~ chain-link fencing on the north and west property lines. The next developer on the west property line will, hopefully, be required to install a block fence. Ms. Payne indicated that .the developer intends to put in light industrial in the future. ACTION: It was moved by Jones and seconded by Garcia and unani- - ~ mously carried to approve the location and development plan with all the findings and conditions as recommended by the Planning Staff. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF PROPOSED RECREATIONAL VEHICLF. FACILITY, INDEX No. W92-80, N/W corner of Hellman Ave. and Foothill Blvd. (Robert Packer) Mr. Lam indicated that the site is currently •vacant with resi- dential located to the north. He indicated that in the process of doing the site plan review, neighbors expressed concern about noise, and because of. this a pulbic hearing for site approval and environmental review is required. The City Planning Staff received tl~e project file on Friday, June 23, 1.978. There is insufficient information within the file to do an adequate environmental assess- ment and Staff was unable to locate the applicant until this morn- ing. Therefore, Staff recommended that the Planning Commission postpone consideration to the meeting of July 26, 1978. Mr. Lam submitted a letter by the applicant agreeing to a postponement. Commissioner Garcia mentioned the procrastination by the County and that the applicant had made every effort to comply. Stated that he hoped action would be taken on the 26th. ACTION: It was moved by Tolstoy, seconded by. Garcia, and unan- imously carried to postpone a hearing on the environmental and site review of Indes No. W92-80 until July 26, 1978. RECESS- Chairman Rempel declared a short recess at 7:37 p.m. RECONVENED At 8:00 p. m. with all members present,~Planning Commission re- convened in a joint session with City Council fora study session on.proposed General Plan Sketch 114: ADJOURNPfENT Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of June 28, 1978 at 10:37 p.m. to its next regularly scheduled meeting Respectfully submitted,, S~ 1° ~'1 ;, r'. nla r;ll; Via!-, n-i,u ~..r rn r;rrv .-- ~' CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 14, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on Wednesday, June 14, 1978 in the Community Service Building.. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Herman Rempel at 7:10 p.m. who lead the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. Commissioners Present: Herman Rempel, Richard Dahl, Sorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy Commissioners Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Correction to the minutes of May 24, 1978: Mr. Garcia stated that under consent item I{7 in the action, the item should have been continued to June 14, 1978 rather than June 10, 1978. Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Jones"and unanimously carried, it'was voted to approve the Planning Commission minutes of May 24, 1978 as corrected and the minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of the City Council/Planning Commission on May 31, 1978. RRPf1RTS The City Manager reported that a City Council/Planning Commission Conference has been scheduled for June 22, 1978. Arrangements will be made for Commis- sioners wishing to attend the Conference. PUBLIC HEARING:: CHANGE OF ZONE-FROM A-1-5 to C-1, INDEX N0. W103-12 S/S of 19TH STREET, APPROX. 1500' E/0 HERMOSA (Louis Parks) Mr. Tommy Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting a zone change from A-1-5 to C-1 to allow the applicant to convert an existing residence into a restaurant. The site is located on the s/s of 19th Street approx. mid-block between Haven and Hermosa Avenues. To the east is residential and to the west pis agricultural and residential. It is staff's opinion that the proposed zone change would set a precedent-for strip commercial on 19th between the site and Archibald Avenue. Based upon their findings and analyses, staff recommends that the zone change be denied. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Trousil spoke on behalf of the applicant'in favor of the project. He stated that it is the applicant's desire to'convert this residence into a French restaurant and to preserve it as a landmark in Alta Loma. Mr. Louis Parks, the applicant, spoke in favor of the request stating that they will emphasize the historical influence of the home. He believed that a high quality restaurant would be an asset to the community and would bring prestige~to the area. Mr. Parks read a letter signed by his immediate neighbors approving of the proposed project. Mr. Tom Orr, a resident of the area, spoke in opposition to the proposed zone change stating that there are quite a few residential homes in the area, and they are concerned with having commercial use within a residential area. He also expressed concern :regarding increased traffic on 19th Street. Mr. Frank Newman spoke in opposition to .the request and presented a petition with 63 signature of those property owners 'in the closest proximity`to the site. who were opposed to the project. He stated that parents were concerned with the heavy .traffic which would be generated from the restaurant and felt that this project would hot be in the best interest of the community. - 1 - .. - '' Planning Commission Minutes June 14, 1978 Mr. John Vargo spoke in opposition stating that the project would'be fine if it were in a different location. Mr. Jerry Thompson stated that he thought-19th Street would be developed into a four lane highway and would be able to bear the traffic. He felt that people in the community could use another good restaurant. There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. Mr. Garcia and Mr. Tolstoy expressed 't heir concern with setting a precedent of strip commercial within a residential area. They felt that it would be good to preserve the historical value of the residence but'that strip:commercial' zoning would not be good planning for the community. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to deny the change of zone request for Index No. W103-12 based on the findings and analyses as recommended by the planning staff. APPEAL OF DIRECTOR'S ACTION E/S ETIWANDA AVENUE, APPROX. 300' N/0 WHITTRAM (Secondo Colombero) Mr. Wasserman reported that the city is appealing the decision of the County Planning Department to waive the requirement for street improvements on this property. He stated that-the County's decision would "set a precedent and would not be in the best interest of the community. Mr. Justin McCarthy, attorney for the applicant, stated that'Mr. & Mrs. Colom- bero have appealed the requirement for street improvements as outlined in their letter dated March 13, 1978. Mr. McCarthy stated that there appears to be a decline in vehicular traffic along Etiwanda Avenue and there is no guarantee that street-.improvements will'be necessary'on Etiwanda Avenue in the future. He further detailed the applicant's reasons for this appeal. Mr. Wasserman stated that city staff was unaware of the county's action prior to the applicant's receipt of the letter from the County Planning Department and stated that vehicular traffic will probably increase on Etiwanda Avenue. He stated that perhaps the city attorney and the applicant's legal counsel could prepare an agreement to prdvide"f or :the street improvements at a future date when the pioperty.'is~:deyeloped. He reported that it.has been the City Council's policy to require street improvements on all new developments within the community.° ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to waive the immediate cash deposit of $6,500 and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an agreement whereby the applicant and/or their successors will be required.to pay for the street improvements at a future date when the site is developed. The Chairman called for a short recess at 9:05 p.m. The Meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. MINOR SUBDIVISION TO CREATE AN INDUSTRIAL TRACT OF 6 LOTS, INDEX N0. W78-0245-I, S/S of 9TH ST., APPROX. 200' W/0 HELLMAN (Michael Todd) The City Manager reported that the applicant has requested that this item be continued.to July 12, 1978 in order to allow more time .to work with the County Flood Control District. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to July 12, 1978 subject to receipt of a letter from the applicant requesting continuance. - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes June 14, 1978 APPEAL OF PLANNING DIRECTOR'S ACTION, MINOR SUBDIVISION, 4 LOTS, INDEX N0. 78-0025, S/W CORNER VICTORIA'.& EAST AVENUE (Alfredo C. Murillo) Mr :. Stevens reported that the applicant is seeking`_to create four lots from an existing"five acre parcel. The application was not approved as submitted, but an alternate design consisting of two parcels was conditionally approved. The application. was not approved as submitted because all of the conditions required by Ordinance 18 have hot been met. Staff recommends that the Planning Director's action approving 2 lots be upheld based'on their findings and analyses. Mrs. Alfredo Murillo, applicant, spoke in favor of.their request to subdivide the parcel into 4 lots. She stated that they are planning to build on the proposed lot'll3 with the possibility to selling lots`lh and'2. She felt that the school issue would be taken care of by the City Council's ordinance -- requiring a $700 fee for new homes, and that the fire flow capacity requirement is covered by the higher insurance premiums residents of Etiwanda are required to pay. ACTION: 'Upon motion by-Dahl, seconded"by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to August 9,.1978 until the applicant is able to comply with the requirements of Ordinance 18. REPORT ON CONVERSION OF RESIDENCE INTO A RESTAURANT, INDEX N0. W88-81, S/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL & VINEYARD (Gilbert Rodriquez) Mr. Rodriquez, the applicant, presented. the drawings showing landscaping and parking changes as requested by the Planning Commission. ACTION: The Planning Commissioners unanimously requested the applicant to work with the Planning Staff in finalizing their plans in accordance with the Commission'•s earlier findings. MINOR SUBDIVISION TO CREATE AN INDUSTRIAL TRACT OF 15 LOTS,. INDEX N0. W78-0230-I, N/W CORNER OF HAVEN AND JERSEY BLVD. (Crowell/Leventhal/Associated Engineer) Mr. Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting approval to create 16 industrial lots for sale or lease to future industrial users. He gave a detailed report of the staff's .findings and recommendations. Staff recommends that a negative declaration be filed for an Environmental Impact Report and that the Commission approve staff's `recommenddtion in accordance with their findings and standard requirements. Mr. David Benton 'spoke on behalf of 'the applicant and presented a letter from Crowell/Leventhal, Inc. dated June 13, 1978~requesting modifications to the planning staff recommendations. He detailed the modifications requested by the applicant. Mr. Harry Crowell, applicant, stated that they have had some favorable commitments for tenants and would like to have a decision.on this as .soon as possible. Mr. Garcia stated that he did not receive 'any information on this project prior to the meeting and did not feel he could act on it at this time. Mrs. Jones concurred that she did not have'any prior information on this item. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and carried by the following vote - AYES: Dahl, Tolstoy, Rempel; ABSENT: None; ABSTAINING: Garcia and Jones, it was voted to approve the minor subdivision, Index No. W78-0230-I subject to the findings and standard requirements as recommended by the planning staff. - 3 - .- Planning Commission Minutes 'June 14, 1978 DIRECTOR REVIEW, PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, 9211 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, INDEX N0. W97-93 (Vanguard Companies). Mr. Stevens reported that the applicant is proposing to develop a 163,200 sq. feet development for retail sales and light and heavy industrial'. The ' site is north of Frito-Lay and is zoned'M-1 along°Archibald Avenue with M-2 zoning'on-the balance bf the`property.:~-':S taff'recommends'that the project be continued until after the adoption of 'the General Plan. This is a large development which should be consistent'with'the adopted'General Plan. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded 'by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted :to continue this item to August 9, 1978 subject to receipt of~-a letter from the applicant'requesting'continuance of the-item. The.item will be denied based on the finding that the project'is not consistent with the adopted policies of the city should the applicant fail to submit a letter requesting continuance. PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT, PROPOSED 'PRIVATE SCHOOL SITE, 8968 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (Barbara Salyer) The City Manager reported that staff has reviewed the reports from the applicant dealing with traffic, noise, compatibility of land use and structural analysis. of the building. He stated that the applicant has taken mitigating measures to resolve these concerns. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded"by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to file a negative declaration for an Environmental Impact Report on this project. The City Attorney was instructed°to.prepare'.a letter to the 'applicant permitting them'to obtain building permits to commence with remodelling subject to the applicant's fulfilling the conditions and requirements as stated in the. site development review. PRELIMINARY REPORT ON TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 10210, W/0 SAPPHIRE, N/0 ALMOND (J. G'. Lawlor Enterprises) Mr. Bill Morehouse and Rikki"McClintock Alberson of"the Toups Corporation presented their report with maps dealing with the Commissioner's:': concerns on the project. They discussed in detail the environmental concerns raised by the Planning Commission at their last meeting. ~Mr. Dahl stated his"desire to~receive inpurfrom'"the. Foothill Pire District and Mr. Tolstoy'expressed his desire to also receive input from the National Forest Service concerning the-slope and grading of the project. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to July 12, 1978 in order to receive further information from the Fire District and Forest Service as well as an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed project. .,. , POLICY ITEMS: SUBDIVISION MAP ACT ORDINANCE & DISCUSSION. OF PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE The City Manager requested that these two policy items be continued.- Represen- tatives from the sign companies were present at the meeting and were advised that these items would be continued.' Staff 'is proposing to eliminate the section on political signs and the city attorney will be reviewing the legal implications of this section. Mr.Tdlstoy expressed his concern with window advertising signs. ACTION: By unanimous concensus, the Planning Commission voted'to continue these items. - 4 - Planning Commission Minutes June 14, 1978 Mr. Wasserman reported that this would be the last meeting for the Interim Secretary Suzanne Ota. He expressed the city's gratitude for her volunteer services. ACTION:'- Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, the Planning Commissioners 'expressed their thanks to-Mrs. Ota for her-•fine services. ADJOURNMENT: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn to Tuesday, June 20, 1978 at 6:30 p.m. for a study session on the General Plan. The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 midnight. Respectfully submitted, I/J~J~J~ - i , Suz n Ota, Interim Secretary - 5 - ~~ May 31, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt40NGA CITY COUNCIL-PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special Joint 24eetinR A special joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission was held at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wed- nesday, May 31, 1978. Present: Councilmen Phillip Schlosser, Jon 14ikels, Charles West, and Mayor James C. Frost. Planning Commissioners Peter Tolstoy, Jorge Garcia, Richard Dahl, and Chairman Herman Rempel. Absent: Laura Jones and Michael Palombo. Palombo had been excused~by Mayor Frostto represent. the City at another meeting, Mr..Palombo did arrive at the meeting at 9:00 p.m. The City Council and Planning Commission met in joint session to discuss the various alternatives proposed in the city's General Plan. The city's consultant,- -~ Mr. John Blayney, reviewed the various alternatives. Following extensive dis- cussion, the meeting was adjourned at 12:30 a.m. on June 1, 1978. Adjournment: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by West to adjournthe meeting to June 7,;1973: Motion unanimously carried. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia to adjourn to June 14, 1978. Pfotion unanimously carried. Respectfully submitted; Lauren M. Wasserman ._ ~~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 24, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on Wednesday, May 24, 1978 in the Community Service Building. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rempel at 7:05 p:m. who lead with the pledge of allegiance. Commissioners Present: Herman Rempel, Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Peter Tolstoy Commissioner Absent: Laura Jones Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the minutes of the May 10,.1978 Planning Commission Meeting. City Manager Lauren Wasserman announced'that Mr. Jack Lam has been appointed as the new Community Development Director for the city. Mr. Lam, who is presently the Community Development Director for the City of Lompoc, was introduced. and will be on board with the city mid-June. ,~ ,, PUBLIC HEARING: LOCATION $ DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONVERT A RESIDENCE INTO A RESTAURANT (INDEX W88-81) S/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL $ VINEYARD (Gilbert Rodriquez) Doug Payne presented the staff report stating that the applicant is proposing to convert an existing two story residence into a restaurant and is proposing to develop the site with additional commercial buildings. On September 6, 1977, the Board of Super- visors approved the zone change to C-2-T. The "T" standard of the zone requires .special consideration with regards to flood hazards, setbacks and landscaping. The site is located at the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. F, Vineyard Avenue with access on both arterials. It is approximately 200 ft. west of the Cucamonga Creek Channel which is scheduled to be improved by by.1980.and-•i981.through a Federal project. In its present state, however, the Flood Control District states that it would be difficult to adequately protect the site from flood hazards 'as' the site is subject to infrequent flood hazards by reasons of overflow, erosion and debris deposition. The Cucamonga County Water District has indicated that the site has both water and sewer service available for connection. Based upon their findings and analyses, the `planning staff recommends that the project be denied until such time that the Cucamonga Channel is permanently improved. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Wasserman stated that he has met with the applicant who has indicated his :intention of developing just the restaurant at this time. Mr. Gilbert Rodriquez, applicant, spoke in favor of the project. He reviewed the flood hazard concerns and',.presented~.the~;site.-plan and;deSign for the restaurant. Mr. Dahl asked Mr. Rodriquez if he would consent to signing a document releasing the city from future flood hazard liability. The applicant indicated he was agreeable to this. - 1 - Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1978 Mr. Rempel stated that perhaps a wall could be constructed on the west side of the property and on Foothill Blvd. The applicant pointed out that there is.another property owner between the Cucamonga Creek and his property. Mr. Garcia suggested a hat ~._ it would be more desirable to have landscaping on Foothill Blvd. rather than parking. The applicant stated that they would be willing ,to- design a wall and mounds into the front landscaping to help mitigate the flood hazard concerns. Mr. Bert Francis, the adjacent property owner, spoke in favor of the project stating that he would like to see a good restaurant 'ini.the area. Mr. Stan Antee~loser from the Alta Loma Chamber of Commerce and' R9r:'..doe:Di~Oriospoke in favor of the project. There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Rempel and unanimously carried,~it was voted to approve.: the location and development plan to convert.a residence into a restaurant (Index W88-81) subject to-staff findings .a' the following conditions: (1) Recommended staff condition s. k2 through k12. (2) That the plans for':landscaping improvements on Foothill Blvd. as iaellas•the identification signs Be:~reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. (3) That an agreement be prepared by the City Attorney and signed by the appli-cant releasing the city from any flood hazard liability. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF ZONE.FROM R-1-T (N398) TO C-1 (INDEX W87-73), S/E CORNER OF BASELINE RD. ~ CARNELIAN AVENUE (Ontario Savings ~ Loan) Planning Staff member Doug Payne reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from R-1-T to C-1. Ther10 acre site is located at the southeast corner of Baseline and Carnelian. The Environmental Review Board determined that the project would have a non-significant affect on the environment with the excep= tion that a qualified archaelogical observer be required to be present when soil disturbance exceeds 5' in depth. Staff feels that the zone change would increase the amount of commercial property at this intersection from 25 to 35°acres and would be competing with adjacent shopping centers. for the 7,000+ persons that are located within the service area. Based on their findings, staff recommends that the zone change request be continued until after the adoption of the General Plan. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Bob Mills of Associated Engineers spoke on behalf of the applicant Crowell/Leventhal, Inc. He read a letter from Mr. Harry C. Crowell which stated that the owners are.'.deSirous.of develop;n,ga Savings and loan bank, professional offices^_and a restaurant on the site. They are not proposing ari'additonal commercial shopping center such as the adjacent properties. Mr. Mike Kelber, Ontario Savings f, Loan, stated that they have made extensive market surveys which indicate a need for this use. Mr. Kelber clarified that Ontario Savings $ Loan has sold the property to the applicant, Crowell/Leventhal, Inc. - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 1978 Mr. Tolstoy stated his concern for-the need of a buffering for the residential properties s/o`the site. Discussion was held on the possibility of having A/P (Administrative/Professional) zoning on the south portion of the site with C-1 to the north. However, it was stressed that there needs to be continuity in the development of the project. Mr. Stan Antecloser stated that he .felt the Commission should have a plan before them before they decide on the zone change. He asked what is being proposed for this site under the General. Plan. The City Manager stated that the consultant has proposed three different alternatives for this site, and that staff's recommendation to continue this matter until the adoption of the General Plan might be appropriate. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried it was voted to continued the request for a zone change to August 9, 1978, after the adoption of the city's General Plan. The Chairman called for a short recess at 9:10 p.m.. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p.m. The City Manager requested that two additional items be added to the agenda at this time. PRELIMINARY REVIEW FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL .IMPACT REPORT, PROPOSED PRIVATE SCHOOL SITE, 8968 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (Barbara P. Salyer) The City Manager reported that the applicant is seeking to rehabi- litate the existing elementary school site at 8968 Archibald Avenue. It is proposed that the building be used to accommodate a private school to include a Day Care Center and serving grades K-8. The applicant proposes to open the school in September, 1978. Mr. Wasserman stated that the Development Review Committee has recommended that a focus Environmental Impact Report be prepared to study the traffic concerns from Archibald Avenue as well as the noise level in the area from the R-M (Restricted Manufacturing) zone uses in the surrounding area. Also, a report wi~I;l be required from a structural engineer. Mr. Stevens stated-that the Commission should set a public hearing date to review the location and development plans for the project. In order to expedite^the project,-the Commission may consider and approve the project in the R-M zone rather than proceeding through the zone change process. Mr. Stan Antecloser, Alta Loma Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the project and stated that this would certainly help alleviate soineoofnthe:school problems. ACTION: .Upon motion by Garcia', seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried,~it'was voted to approve the Development Review Committee's recommendation that a focus Environmental Impact Report and .a, structural report be prepared for the project. City and planning^ staff were instructed to expedite same and set a date for public hearing. MINOR DEVIATION, E/S OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, W/O WHITTRAM (INDEX #W129-86), (Secondo-Colombero) The City Manager reported that ttie~~applcant has requested that street improvements on Etiwanda Avenue for this development be completed at a latter date since the adjacent areas are undeveloped. - 3 - Planning Commission Minutes May 24,.1978 City staff has been working with the applicant to make a cash deposit in lieu of proceeding w improvements. `ht has°recently'been discovered has waived this requirement and therefore,'the their decision and is requesting'that a public beforeetfie Planning Commission. who has agreed ith the street that the County city is appealing hearing be set ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl; seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted set a public hearing for June 14, 1978 to hear the appeal for a minor deviation, Index #W129-86. POLICY ITEPd: DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE The City Manager reported that it~.would be helpful for staff to obtain additional input from the Commission regarding carious 'aspects-of the Sign Ordinance. Billboard Signs - Staff recommends that a maximum 5 year period be established tor~.amorti~ze~ the billboard signs within the city. as well as non-conforming signs. The Commissioners stated that the `amorfiza:ton.. should be based upon the value of the sign. Mr. Fred Guido from Pacific Outdoor Advertising spoke on behalf of the outdoor advertising companies and requested the Planning Commission to declare a mortorium on the section of the sign ordinance dealing with billboards until a decisioh has been..-' reached'on the San Diego Case 'now before the'St-ate Supreme Court. Mr. TodStoy stated 'hecbelieved_that the comments made at the last meeting indicated that the Commission did not wish to have billboards in Rancho Cucamonga. ACTION: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to instruct staff and the city attorney to prepare an amortization plan to'discontinue billboard signs within the city.o_"ver a_:maxmum_ 5 year period based upon the value 'of the 'sign. _ - -- - .. Non-conforming and Historical Signs - The City Manager reported that consideration needs to made with regards to historical signs 'within the community, such as the Sycamore Inn and Thomas Vineyard signs. Mr. Garcia suggested that perhaps the Chambers of Commerce would.be willing to make a survey of the historical and cultural signs within the community. With regards to subdivision signs, the Commissioners recommended that the city might require a deposit and set a timellimit for these signs. In addition, Mr. Garcia stated that it might be good .to advise sales agents that they are responsible for placement and removal of their signs. Mr:eWasserman stated that staff recommends that roof signs be prohibited unless there were no other alternative for placement of the sign in which case, the roof sign would be reviewed through the conditional use permit procedures. Mr. Garcia stated that '._ .roof .signs should be a composite part of the building and that a maximum size should be set for the sign. Mr. Wasserman stated that the City Attorney would review recent cases regarding election signs and would prepare the appropriate recommendation based on same. Mr. Garcia stated that a provision for temporary signs should be incorporated into the sign ordinance (e.g., Grand Openings, etc.). Mr. Tolstoy stated that the use of window signs needs to be reviewed.. The-permanent~use-of"•window signs is a problem in the community. Also, the maintenance of the signs should be spelled out in the ordinance. - 4 - • Planning Commission Minutes D4ay 24, 1978 CONSENT ITEMS: The City Manager reported that'the Development Review Committee had reviewed the projects listed under the consent items to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report would be required. The .Commission requested that Items #4, #6 and #7 be pulled off and heard seoarately. #1 - INDUSTRIAL PARK, 9181 9th Street, Cucamonga MR Zone (Restricted Manufacturing) (Michael Todd) Recommendation: That an:Environmental Impact Report is not required and that a negative declaration be filed. #2 - INDUSTRIAL ~, COMMERCIAL DIVISION OF LAND, e/s of Haven at Jersey Avenue, Cucamonga, M-2 (Crowell/Leventhall, Inc.) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. #3 - 'ZONE CHANGE, e/s of Archibald, 150' n/o Devon, Cucamonga From R-1 to C-2 (conversion of residence) (F. E. Shelley) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. #5 - ZONE CHANGE, sw corner of Arrow $ Archibald, from A-1 to M-R (Harry S. Rinker) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed. ACTION: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the Development Review Committee's recommendations for consent items #i, #2,..#3 and #5. CONSENT ITEMS: #4 - ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1 to Conversion of residence Recommendation: That a C-1, 10323 19th Street, to restaurant (L. R. Parks) negative declaration be filed. Mr. Wasserman reported that the Development Review Committee felt that there were some significant site'and development concerns but did not feel that an Environmental Impact Report was required and that a negative declaration should be filed. Staff indicated that the residence was on a septic tank at the present time and that it mould easily hookup to the sewer with a proposed develop- ment nearby. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia,.seconded by Tolstoy and carried by the following vote: AYES - Garcia, Tolstoy, Rempel; NOES - Dahl; ABSENT - Jones, it was voted. to instruct staff to provide additional information on this project for further review by the Planning Commission. #6 - ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1 to C-2, s/w intersection of Foothill Blvd. at I-15, construction of Building Supply Center (William F. Longley) Recommendation: That a negative declaration be filed arid'. thatrcomments be~received from the County Flood Control District on the project. The City Manager reported that the Development Review Committee has recommended that a negative declaration by filed on the proposed project. Concern was raised regarding the heavy traffic from trucks to the supply center. Staff stated that Foothill Blvd. is a major arterial ahd~~should be able to sustain the traffic. ACTION: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to file a negative declaration on the project. - S - ~,, Planning Commission Minutes CONSENT ITEMS: ~7 - ZONE CHANGE FROM R-1-14 to R-1-20,000, Avenue, 200' w/o Sapphire (J. Gregory- - F, TENTATIVE'TRACT N0. 10210 May 24, 1978 n/s of Almond Lawlor,''Enterprises) RECOMMENDATION: That a negative declaration be filed on the project. In addition, the project will be reviewed by the Planning Commission due to hillside concerns and the County Flood Control District will be requested to comment on the project. Mr. William Morehouse of the Toups Corporation, San Diego, spoke in favor of the project and gave a presentation on the proposed development. He stated that when the project plans were submitted, the County Planning Department advised them that they could not submit an Environmental Impact Report with the plans. He stated that they have been working with the County Transporation Dept. and the National Forest Service in regards to the circulation and the national forest to .the north. Mr. Morehouse described the slope analysis prepared for the project and pointed out the open space adjacent to the Cucamonga Wash and highly sloped areas.. Chief Billings stated that the Fire District has been reviewing the plans with the Forest Service. Mr. Garcia stated that the Commission has concerns with the project because of its size:(160 acres), the Edison lines running through the property, the national forest to the north and the hillside terrain:. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue the Environmental Impact Report review and Tentative Tract No. 10210 to June 10, 1978 in order to receive additional information on 't he site analyses studies and correspondeneecwith Forestry Service from the applicant. COMMISSION'DISCUSSION: Mr. Dahl expressed his concerns regarding the processing of commercial developments and requested that the city staff refer all commercial developments to the Planning Commission for review. In addition, he requested that the city attorney prepare an ordinance specifying`that'.all-service::stations be reviewed by the .Planning Commission under the conditional use permit process. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted`to instruct city staff to refer all commercial developments"f o--the'Planning Commission for review and to instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance specifying`"that all service stations be reviewed by the Planning Commission under the conditional use permit process. ADJOURNMENT: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn to the joint meeting with the City Council on Wednesday, May 31,.1978 at 7:00 p.m. The .meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.. m. Respectfully submitted, Suza Ota, Interim Secretary - 6 - ___ :~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes - Regular Meeting May 10, 1978 CALL TO ORDER The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission met in a Regular Session on Wednesday, May 10, 1978, at the Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Building, 9161 Baseline Road. Meeting was called to order by Chairman Herman Rempel at 7:10 p.m. PLEDGE OF Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Rempel. ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Present were Commissioners Dahl,-Garcia, Rempel and Tolstoy. Absent was Commissioner Jones. MINUTES Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Tolstoy and Garcia Minutes of April 26, 1978 Meeting be approved as posted. Motion Carried Unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS COMMUNITY City Manager, Lauren Wasserman, announced interviews for Community DEVELOPMENT Development Director would be held May 11. Appointment to be made DIRECTOR as soon as possible. GENERAL PLAN Mr. Wasserman announced a change in date for the General Plan Meeting. ~4EETING Meeting to be held on May 23, 7:00 p.m., at Alta Loma Hi 9h School. LETTER OF THANKS Commissioner Dahl requested a letter be sent, on behalf of the City, expressing thanks to Captain Wickum, of the County Sheriff's Department for arranging for Members of Commission and City Staff to join in an aerial view of the City from a helicopter. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS ZONE CHANGE Zone Change from R-1 to AP, Index No. W93-73, Southeast Corner Baseline Road and Hellman Avenue. Applicant: Doug Hone. Tom Stephens, County Planning, recommended approval of zone change. Aerial maps were presented detailing location. Mr. Stephens reported requested change would be in harmony with the General Plan conditions. Discussion followed during which maintenance of parkways was questioned. Chairman Rempel questioned Fire Chief, Gene Billings, about impact on traffic control if zone change is granted. Chief Billings reported requested change would have no adverse effect on traffic control. Doug Hone reported on proposed design of site. Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Dahl and Garcia approval of requested zone change be recommended to City Council for favorable action, providing that site development plan be submitted to Planning Commission prior to issuance of permits. Motion Carried Unanimously. ZONE CHANGE Zone Change from R-3 to AP, Index No. W94-72 Northwest corner of Baseline Road and Amethyst Street. Applicant: James A. VanAntwerp. Applicant'has submitted site plan of proposed development to County Planning. Tom Stephens reported zone change from R-3 to AP is a sound idea, as high density development permitted by R-3 zoning would not be in compliance with proposed conditions of General Plan, and would not be in harmony with existing commercial sites. Mr. Stephens offered aerial maps showing existing development. Mr. Stephens reported that applicant has offered to meet all required dedications and setbacks; however, before permit is applied for, a variance may be requested. Commissioner Garcia asked Mr. Stephens if property owners adjacent to Mr. Van Antwerp's property had been notified. Mr. Stephens reported they had. Chairman Rempel opened the meeting for public comment. Neighboring property owners Art Allen and Dianne Rimm reported they had received notification of proposed zone change only 1 day in'advance of this hearing. They questioned exactly what sort of businesses would be placed next to their homes. It was explained by Commissioner Garcia that a zone change is required before a site plan can be approved. Commissioner Rempel reported it was the intention of the Planhing Commission to act with fairness to all residents, land owners, and developers of Rancho Cucamonga. Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Garcia and Dahl that requested zone change be recommended for approval by the City Council. Discussion followed. Vote was called for. Ayes: Dahl, Garcia, Rempel Noes: Tolstoy Absent: Jones Motion Carried by a Vote of 3-1. GAS STATION Amend the Location and Development Plan to add a gas station, with PROPOSED provisions to sell food items, Index No. W96-73. Location, Southwest corner of Archibald and Baseline. Applicant: Mobile Oil/Property Investment West. Tom Stephens showed a drawing of shopping center in question, noting- proposed signs on gas station site. Mr. Stephens noted that the original site plan for this shopping center showed a bank at this location and suggested that a gas station located there would not fit in with the original over-all concept of the center. Also, the proposed monument signs were questionable pending Council action on Sign Ordinance. Representative of Property Investment West, Bart Rinker, offered drawings of proposal and arguments in support of gas station location. Representative of Mobile Oil, Robert Graham was present and offered a rendering of proposed gas station. Commission questioned traffic problems, vandalism and views of other tenants associated with location of gas station in center. Ron Lyons and Janet Cocheran, tenants from shopping center expressed opposition to approval of gas station. Tom Stephens suggested all other types of uses be considered, and new plan not be approved; furthers original plan, showing bank to be located there, be retained. Discussion followed.. Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Dahl and Tolstoy that Location and Development Plan Amendment be denied on the basis of Planning Department findings: 1. That the site proposed is not adequate in size and shape to accomodate said use for parking and loading areas. 2. That the site for the proposed use has inadequate access as the site relates to streets and highways properly designed as to width and improvement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. 3. The sign standard has not been met. 4. A gas station would not be in harmony with original concept of shopping center. Discussion Followed. Motion Carried Unanimously. LETTER TO .Chairman Rempel requested a letter be sent to Property Development PROPERTY DEVELOP- West informing them of Commission Action. MENT WEST RECESS Chairman Rempel called for a short recess at 9:45 p.m. -2- MEETING RESUMED Chairman Rempel called the meeting back to order at 9:30 p.m. All Commission Members present at original Roll Call were in attendance. CHANGE IN ORDER Chairman Rempel announced a change in order of the agenda Policy OF POLICY ITEMS Items, 1 & 2. SIGN ORDINANCE Mr. Wasserman reported that the Planning Commission had received draft copies of the proposed Sign Ordinance in early March for review. He announced his attendance at Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday, May 9. Key points of discussion were: Roof signs, non-conforming signs- billboards. Mr. Wasserman recommended against adoption of the ordinance at this time, as more review seems necessary. Participating in discussion regarding sign ordinance were: Betty McKay, Member of Board of Directors for Chamber of Commerce, and Doug Hone. Both parties reported more time is necessary for various committees to study all aspects of ordinance. Also needed is more time to gather public input. BILLBOARDS Commission discussion regarding billboards was held. Representative from Pacific Outdoor Advertising, Fred Guido, spoke to Commission, offering suggestions for reasonable approach concerning adoption of sign ordinance. Mr. Wasserman suggested submitting recommendations from various sign ordinance committees to Invironmental Development Review Board, composed of City Department Heads, for their review and recommendation. Chairman Rempel stressed that the Commission was not taking a definite stand for or against billboards. He then suggested the Commission Members be polled as to their thoughts on whether to hold the proposed sign ordinance for Commission Review, or defer it to Review Board and various sub-committees. Mr: Wasserman discussed with Commission the number of billboards within the community and the various ways of limiting the number. COMMISSION Commissioner Garcia recommended study of ordinance be deferred to POLL Review Board and requested Mr. Guido work closely with that Board and with Chamber of Commerce sign committee and area industry in formulating recommendations to be submitted to Commission. Commissioner Dahl reported on h.is "inclination" to phase out billboards completely. 0 Commissioner Tolstoy reported on his wish for a distinctive community without "vision pollution". He Stated that while revenues from billboard advertising companies are important, no "vision pollution" has priority. Chairman Rempel suggested that perhaps the advertising from billboards for community businesses was not really that much; as the larger billboards usually advertise things other than community businesses. Discussion was held on limiting content of billboard signs. City Attorney reported that billboards cannot be regulated because of content. Discussion of sub-division signs was held. Joe D'Orio stated it was the task of the B.I.A. to formulate a specific sign program regarding advertisements of sub-divisions. Mr. Wasserman reported sub-division signs would be handled separately from billboards, and that it would be the duty of the Planning Commission to set proper standards for them. -3- ~, Chairman Rempel informed Mr. Guido that the polling of the Commission was to inform him of the intentions concerning the possible phasing out of billboards, and of Commission intention to include in Sign Ordinance that existing envestments in billboards could be-amortized. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the sign ordinance would conform with the General Plan. Commissioner Garcia suggested that outdoor advertising be a topic of public discussion at the General Plan Meeting May 23, and possible Commission action to be taken at the Planning Commission Meeting on May 24. SUB-DIVISION May 10 Memo from Mr. Wasserman to Planning Commission concerning ORDINANCE sub-division Ordinance was reviewed. Draft of Sub-Division Ordinance was thoroughly reviewed. Incorporated in the changes, deletions and addendum to the ordinance were recommendations from representatives of local contractors and engineers, contained in May 10 Memo, and recommendations from Southern California Edison Company; also Memo from County Planning Department. Are-draft of the amended ordinance will be compiled and submitted to Commission for review. HILLSIDE Section 4, pertaining to Hillside development, is to be deleted DEVELOPMENT from Sub-Division Ordinance. It will require a separate ordinance, upon completion of review by local engineers. At that time, specific definition of "Hillside" to be completed. Comments from Commission: Re-Draft to include- - - Storm drain requirements, grading, bicycle paths, horse trails, parkway standards, Foothill Fire Protection District recommendations, and a review for legality. Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Garcia and Tolstoy to continue Sub-Division implementation review until June 10 Meeting. Motion Amended to read June 14 Meeting. Motion Carried Unanimously. TREE PRESERVATION Per City Council request, Commission reviewed County Tree Ordinance. Discussion was held on definition of "native tree" term used. Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Dahl and Tolstoy that approval of existing County Code pertaining to tree preservation be given as as adequate interim measure. Discussion followed at which time Mr. Wasserman stated tree ordinance had been previously adopted by City Council by reference when adopting County Code. Motion and Second Withdrawn. ADJOURNMENT Moved and Seconded by.Commissioners Tolstoy and Garcia Meeting be adjourned. Motion Carried Unanimously. Meeting was adjourned by Chairman Rempel at 1:05 a.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Mary I. Haines, Acting Secretary R ~ ~ • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 26, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on iNednesday, April 26, 1978 at 7:05 p.m. in the Community Service Building. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rempel who opened .with the pledge of allegiance. Commissioners present: Herman Rempel, Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia; Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy Commissioners absent: None Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, the minutes of the April 12, 1978 meeting were approved. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS: City Manager Lauren Wasserman reported that the oral interviews for the position of Community Development Director would be held on May 11, 1978. Commissioners Garcia and Tolstoy were selected to participate on the oral board interviews. CONTINUED ITEMS: TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 9583 (REVISED) E/0 HAVEN, APPROX. 1000' N/0 WILSON AVENUE (Deer Creek Development Co./Madole F, Associates, Inc.) F, PHASING OF TENTATIVE TRACT 9584 INTO - TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 9584-1, 9584-2; 9584-3, E/0 HAVEN, APPROX. 1500' N/0 WILSON AVENUE (Deer Creek Development Co./PAadole~ ~, Associates, Inc.). Planning staff member Mr. Stevens reported that these items were continued from the Planning Commission Meeting of March 22, 1978. He briefly described the projects as stated in their earlier staff report and stated that the City Council had indicated their desire to have tracts developed in phases rather than recording a large number of homes at one time. He indicated staff's feeling that it would be more desirable to grade smaller areas rather than to grade the whole tract at onee. Staff recommends that both tentative tracts be approved subject to conditions and findings as stated in their staff report to the Commission. Mr. Dahl asked if a report had been received from the attorney regarding the CCB,Rs. Mr. Wasserman reported that a letter has been received from the Assistant City Attorney, Mr. Edward Hopson, stating the recommendations from Attorney Donald E. Maroney. The proposed revision has been incorporated in the proposed CCB,Rs. Mr. Tony Zenz spoke on behalf of the applicant. He gave a brief description of the project, reviewed the planned phasing of the tracts and indicated that the applicantTis willing to comply with the attorney's revision to the CC$Rs. Mr. Milt Madole described the revisions of the flood control channel north,of Tentative Tract 9583 as well as the revisions to the tract. Discussion was held regarding the drainage from these tracts. Messrs. Tolstoy and Garcia expressed concern as to where all the run-off would drain from the tracts and stated that a definite drainage plan needs to be developed. Mr. Joe Colley from the County Road Department stated that easements will have to be obtained from property owners to the east of the tract to permit a portion of the drainage from these tracts to pass through their property. bor. Zenz stated that the applicant has been working for months on the drainage problem and is working with the property owners to acquire the necessary easements. - 1 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 26, 1978 Mr. Dan Nicholson, Landscape Architect for the applicant, reported on the circulation and landscaping of the tract. He stated that the bridal trails will run in front of the homes ahd-3escribed the landscaping along the trails. Horse crossings will be. kept to a ..minimum for traffic control purposes and indicated that the trails .can be used to pedestrian traffic also. Mr: Garcia expressed concern over the lack of sidewalks in the tract. Mr. Stevens reported that on the larger lots of half-acre and 1 acre size, sidewalks are not required by the County. It has been staff's feeling that property owners of horse property fiadiaedifferent life style and the costs for the street improvements on the large lots would be a great financial burden on the property owner. The Asst. City Attorney stated that the city will not be liable if a provision for pedestrian traffic is provided. Discussion was. held regarding the school concern. Mr. Zenz stated that the applicant is working with the school districts on this. Mr. Nicholson stated that many of the corners throughout the tract could be used for bus stops for school children. Mr. Garcia stated that he would like to see some form of identifica- tion or focal point for the development. Mr,. Stevens reported that monument sign designs have been received by the Planning staff and that staff would be happy to review them with the Commission. Mr. Tolstoy.questioned why Tract No. 9583 was not included in the BIA's List.. Mr. Zenz stated that at that time, the tentative tract was undergoing revisions which precluded its inclusion in the list. Commissioners Rempel and Garcia stated that they would like to have a verification r"egarding the action taken by the City Council on this matter. Mr. Hopson stated that final approval of the final tract map could not be taken until the provisions of Ordinance 18 are met. ACTION: Upon motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve Tentative Tract No. 9583 (revised) and the phasing of Tentative Tract No. 9584 subject to the following conditions: (1) Based on. the conditions and findings as recommended by the Planning Staff. (2) That an adequate alternative drainage system plan be developed; (3) That an adequate pedestrian accessibility plan be developed; (4) That an adequate design of horse trails be developed; (,S) That adequate provisions be developed for drainage through the properties easterly of 'the proposed tracts; (6) That the revision from Attorney Maroney be incorporated into the CCF,Rs; (7) That an adequate transportation plan be developed; and (8) That this matter be further clarified and verified with the previous action taken by the City Council. NON-HEARING ITEM: REQUEST FROM ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR REVIEW OF PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE,~IN THE AREA OF 19TH STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE. - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 26, 1978 Chairman Rempel requested that this item be heard next. Superintendent Floyd Stork reported on the Alta Loma School District's proposed site in the vicinity of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street,and indicated the: district's desire to locate a site south of 19th Street so that children would not have to cross 19th Street. About 500 homes are planned to be developed in the area and the school will serve a capacity of 800 children. ACTION: .Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Tolstoy_and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve and endorse the purchase of the Hermosa school site by the Alta Loma School District. Chairman Rempel called for a short break°at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:20 p.m. CONTINUED ITEMS: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A-1 to R-3, INDEX N0. W85-82 S/E CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. F, BAKER AVENUE (Donovan Schowalter) Mr. Stevens reported that this item was continued from April 12, 1978. He briefly described the project stating that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from A-1-to R-3 on 7.2 acres. After further review of this proposed zone change, he stated that it is staff's recommendation that the zone be changed to 5,000 R-3-T, and that finding #S in the staff report be deleted. Mr. Wayne Blanton spoke on. behalf of the applicant. He stated that 7.2 acres is too small for a mobile home park development and would hope for a zone change permitting 14 units per acre. Dlr. Garcia stated that it would be helpful to have a preliminary proposal to review in conjunction with the zone change. Mr. Blanton stated that they would like to have the zone change so that they can come back to the Commission with a proposed plan. Chairman Rempel-stated that it, would be asking a lot of the applicant to have a plan prepared iahile not knowing whether he would be able to obtain a zone change. Mr. Stevens stated that a 3,000 R-3-T zone would permit the development to 14 units per acre. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve a change of zone from A-1 to 3,000 R-3-T based on the following conditions: (1) That the change of zone be in accordance with the findings as recommended by the "planning staff with the deletion of finding #5; (2) That the enabling ordinance be withheld until the site plaric:c for the development has been approved. (3) That the zone change be granted for a 1 year period. Mr. Wasserman stated that the second reading of the ordinance would be withheld until the project is approved. - 3 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 26, 1978 CONSENT ITEMS: PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Environmental Impact Reports) Mr. Wasserman reported that an Environmental Review Committee will be established to review proposals to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report will be required. Consent Items 1 through 8 have been reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and its' recommendations are listed. Mr: Wasser- mancexplai!ned that all items listed under consent are considered to be routine and can be enacted by one motion, unless a Commissioner wishes to pull from the consent any item which can then be discussed separately by the Planning Commission. Mr. Dahl stated that he would like to pull items 2, 3 and 4. Mr. Garcia requested that item 7 be pulled off the consent items. ACTION: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by .Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the :following consent items: (1) Conversion of an existing residence into a restaurant, s/w corner of Foothill Blvd. F, Vineyard Avenue, C-2-T - A negative declaration has'_been~determined. (5) Zone Change from 7M-R3-T to A-1 - Expansion of an existing nursery, n/o of 19th St., approx. 200' w/o Amethyst - A negative declaration has :.been'~determined. (6) Change of ;zone from R-1 to A-P, s/e corner of Baseline $ Hellman, approx. 2.3 acres (Douglas ~ Kathleen Hone) A negative declaration has been determined. (8) Change of zone from R-3 to A-P, .37 acre, n/w corner of Baseline ~ Amethyst (James Van Antwerp)- A negative declaration has been determined. Mr. Dahl stated that on items 2, 3 and 4', he would hope that the applicants are aware that a new ordinance islbeing prepared regarding minimum lot sizes. Mr. Garcia stated in regards to item 7,, that he would hope to see the Environmental Impact Report address drainage and topographical concerns as well as provide mitigating measures on same. He also stated his desire to revieiaethe basic guidelines for Environmental Impact Reports. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the following consent items: (2) Tentative Tract 10363, 9z acre's, R-1 development, n/s of Hillside Road, approx. 1000' w/o Sapphire Street - A negative declaration has been determined. (3) Tentative Tract 10157 $ zone change from A-1-S to R-1-20,000, 30.8 acres, s/o Wilson, e/o Chaffey College, n/o Banyan - Because of potential flood "problems, an Environ- mental Impact Report would be necessary. (7) Zone change from FP-2 to R-3, s/s of Baseline, approx. 775' w/o the intersection of Baseline 6, Vineyard - Because of potential flood hazards, an Environmental Impact Report will be required for this project. - 4 - .. Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 26, 1978 DISCUSSION: Mr. Garcia -movedtto.have a.Planning Commission Task Force assigned at a future meeting to review the "community design standards" and the "residential growth management plan" for the city. Mr. Dahl seconded this and it was unanimously agreed that this needs to be undertaken in the near future. Mr. Dahl inquired about the two ordinances regarding minimum residential structure size per lot size and the regulations on the placement of residential air conditioning units. Mr. Wasserman stated that these items would be developed as resolutions during the interim period. ADJOURNMENT: Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn to April 29, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. at the Alta Loma High School. pectfully submitt 7 ! Re Via im.Secretary - 5 - • \ • • - ~ • _ .~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 12, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on Wednesday, April 12, 1978, at 7:36 p.m. in the Community Service Building. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rempel and was opened with the pledge of allegiance. Commissioners Present: Herman Rempel, Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy Commissioners Absent: None Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, the minutes of the March 22, 1978 Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission were approved. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-3 TO C-1, INDEX N0. W97-85 APPkOXIMATELY 204' S/0 ARROW ROUTE, APPROX. 332' E/0 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT) Planning staff member Mr. Tom Stevens reported that the applicant;_the.Chino Basin Municipal Water District, is requesting a change of zone from R-3 to C-1 to permit the expansion of their office parking area. A neighborhood service center is proposed on the northeast portion of the site. Mr. Stevens detailed the staff report on this item and made the following revisions to staff "T" standards recommended, which should read as .follows: (1) A location and development plan to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Design considerations shall include but not be limited to the location of driveways, parking areas, sidewalks, walls, loading areas, landscaping, proposed signs, lighting fixtures, proposed structures and irrigation improvements. (2) The permitted uses on the easterly portion of the site (parcels adjacent to the residential subdivision) shall be limited to those C-1 zone district uses that will be, in the opinion of the Planning Director, compatible with single family residential uses. (6) That all buildings shall be in conformance with city setback regulations. Further that no buildings shall be constructed within these minimum setback areas. All other "T" standands to remain the same. Mr. Garcia questioned the inclusion of the Upland Assistance League property in this zone change. City Attorney Dougherty stated that this property should not be included in this item at this time since it was not .included in the advertised public hearing. Chairman Rempel declared the public hearing open. Mr. Theo Nowak, Assistant General manager of the^Chino Basin'h9unicipal'14ater District, spoke in favor of the requested zone change. Mr. Garcia asked if a cul-de-sac will be made at the end of Alpine Street. Mr. Stevens stated that the street will end as it presently is without a cul-de-sac. Chief Billings of the Foothill Fire District stated that it was their feeling that some provision should be made for a turn around for traffic coming into this street. City Manager Wasserman indicated that staff would work with the Fire District to work out any fire access concerns. ' There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. Mr. Tolstoy inquired as to what kinds of activities would be undertaken in the County neighborhood facility. Mr. Holley stated that it will be a multi-purpose - 1 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 12, 1978 neighborhood facility provided by the County which will include health care services, recreation programs for youth and general services facilities in all facets of community operations. May, 1979 is the anticipated opening date of the facility. ACTION: On motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl and carried by the following vote - AYES: Garcia, Dahl, Jones, Rempel; ABSTAINING: Tolstoy, it was voted to approve the change of zone from R-3 to C-1, Index No. W97-85 based on the findings and "T" standards as revised and recommended by staff with the following substitution for planning staff finding #1: (1) Due to the existing commercial uses in the area, there is reasonable probability that the C-1 zone district will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered; and there is little or no probability of substantial detriment or interference with the future adopted General Plan if the C-1 district is ultimately consistent with the General Plan. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A-1 TO R-3, INDEX N0. W85-82 S/E CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. $ BAKER AVENUE (Donovan Schowalter) Mr. Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from A-1 to R-3 on 7.2 acres to permit the development of an apartment complex. The site fronts on both Baker Avenue and Foothill Blvd. and it is most likely that access on Foothill Blvd. will be prohibited since it is designated as a major highway. Mr. Stevens stated that staff is of the opinion that the site 3s not conducive to apartments as the site will be surrounded by mobile home parks. He asked that finding #S be deleted and based on staff's findings and analyses, it was recommended that this .item be continued until the General Plan is adopted. In addition, it was their recommendation that the A-1 zoned st"rip of property to the south of the site be included in this change of zone. Should the Planning Commission wish to recommend approval, staff recommends that the zone be changed to R-3-T (69IP). Mr. Tolstoy expressed concern over the circulation problems. Mr. Dougherty stated that this would be covered with the development standards. Staff indicated that two access openings would be recommended on Baker Avenue with no access on Foothill. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Donovan Schowalter, applicant, spoke in favor of the zone change. He stated that he did not include his home and the strip of property to the south of the site in the zone change because he did not want to see his property taxes rise. There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed Mr. Garcia stated his concern over the use of a high density apartment complex next to mobile homes,and did not feel this was the proper thing to do. He stated his concern that if the R-3 zone were granted, it would not restrict other types of R-3 uses. Mr. Stevens stated that "T" standards could be applied to the zone change which`would withhold the enabling ordinance until the site development plans had been approved.: Mr. Garcia stated that he was not sure the city could legally do this. ACTION: On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to continued the zone change request, index no. W85-82 to April 26, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A-1 TO R-1, INDEX N0. W85-67 S/W CORNER OF 19TH STREET $ JASPER STREET (Robert Bowdoin) Mr. Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from A-1 to R-1 on 2.3 acres to permit a minor subdivision on the west portion of the site. The surrounding densities are four units per acre, and it appears likely that the General Plan will designate the site with a similar density. Based upon findings - 2 - w .. • • Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 12, 1978 and analyses as well as the city attorneys findings, staff recommends the approval of this zone change. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Their being no one to speak in favor or opposition to the matter, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. ACTION: On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the change of zone from A-1 to R-1, Index No. W85-67.based upon staff's and the city attorney's findings and analyses. PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1-1 TO R-1-20,000, INDEX N0. W92-57 W/S OF HELLMAN, APPROXIMATELY 2000 FEET N/0 BANYON STREET (R. L. Acinage) Mr. Stevens reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from R-1-1 to R-1-20,000 to permit a minor subdivision development of 4 lots approximately acre .in size on the 2.4 acre site. The 'Z acre lot size has been established in the area, and based upon their findings, staff amends their recommendation that the change of zone to R-1-20,000 be approved for the subject site only. The Chairman declared the hearing open. There being no one to speak in favor or opposition, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. ACTION: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the change of zone from R-1-1 to R-1-20,000, index no. W92-57 based upon staff's findings and amended recommendation. NON-HEARING ITEMS: PROPOSAL FOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR SCHOOL SITES (Alta Loma School District) Superintendent Floyd Stork of the Alta Loma School District presented the study prepared to assist the school district in the location of school sites to the Planning Commission. He detailed the procedure which the school district must undertake in the acqusition of school sites and pointed out the future proposed school sites in the district. In their letter of April 4, 1978 to the Planning Commission, 2 parcels were requested for consideration. Mr. Stork indicated that Parcel 1 will in all likelihood be abandoned and that the school district is requesting consideration of Parcel 2 at this time. Mr. Garcia stated that it would be desirable to have a Master Plan of all schools in Rancho Cucamonga, and that it would be desirable for the Alta Loma School District to provide input to the consultant preparing the city's General Plan. ACTION: Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to approve the acquisition of Parcel 2 by the Alta Loma School District. The Chairman called a short recess at 9:45 p.m. At 10:00 p.m., the meeting was reconvened. MEETING IVITH COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Mr. Wasserman stated that a meeting has been scheduled with the County Flood Control District to brief the Commission on present and proposed district plans for Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting will be held on April 25, 1978 at 7:00 p.m. RESOLUTION CHANGING FETING TIME Mr. Wasserman reported that as requested by the Commission, staff has prepared a resolution for the City Council changing the meeting time of the Planning Commission from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. This resolution will be heard at the next City Council meeting. - 3 - Planning Commission (cont'd) April 12, 1978 POLICY ITEMS: (Discussion Only) DISCUSSION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Mr. Stevens presented copies of the planning staff's recommendations regarding the proposed Subdivision Ordinance. He stated that staff will work closely with the City Attorney on mutual areas of concern. Discussion was held regarding section 12 (h) and (i) and section 6 (c). Mr. Wasserman reported that during the rainy seasons, many street improvements were not completed within 60 days which caused flood problems on major streets. Staff would recommend that in .reference to section 12 (h), that the 60 days be deleted and substituted with: All improvements on existing streets shall be completed "prior to the issuance of building permits." Mr. Rempel stated that the streets would be in a much better state if 2 layers of asphalt was applied in .the street construction. Mr. Stevens also made reference to section 6 (c) requesting 120% improvement security bond. The City Attorney stated that 1000 is the maximum allowable by State law. Mr. Garcia stated that a storm drain fee schedule should be prepared. Mr. Wasserman reported that the City Council, at their last meeting, instructed the City Engineer to update the storm drain fee schedule. Mr. Rempel stated that he would like to see reference made to restricting the amount of grading in the hillside areas to avoid the tremendous cuts and fills. Mr. Garcia stated that he would like to see more details on bikeways, transportation matters, storm drains, etc. elaborated in the ordinance. Mr. Dougherty stated that much of these development standards can be promul- gated by resolutions whereby it would be much easier to amend resolutions rather than going back to the original subdivision ordinance each time a revision comes up. Mrs. Jones stated concern over the slope density of developments on hillsides. Mr. Tolstoy expressed his concern over the preservation of trees within the ~• community. Mr. Doug Hone stated that this is an important ordinance which needs close study and should not be adopted in haste. ACTION: On motion by Jones, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue the Subdivision Ordinance to May 10, 1978. DISCUSSION OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE Mr. Stevens handed out a memo indicating the planning staff's comments on the proposed sign ordinance. He stated staff's desire to come before the Commission at a later date to present a more detailed report of the various aspects of the sign ordinance. Mr. Fred Guido of Pacific Outdoor Advertising presented the Commission with a proposed ordinance which was developed from those surrounding communities which they have worked with. Mr. Stevens recommended that this item be continued to May 10, 1978 to enable the Commission and staff to review the ordinance prepared by Pacific Outdoor Advertising. Mrs. Mary Barlow stated that she would hope that the Commission would review sign ordinances from other cities and perhaps come up with a more restrictive ordinance. Mr. Ken Willis suggested that the staff obtain copies of the subdivision ordinance from the cities of Claremont and Riverside which in his opinion are very good ones. ACTION: On motion by Garcia, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue the sign ordinance to May 10, 1978. - 4 - ~- Planning Commission (cont'd) DISCUSSION OF ORDINANCE SETTING REQUIREMENTS ON . MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND LOT SIZE $ . ORDINANCE PLACING REGULATIONS ON THE PLACEMENT OF RESIDENTIAL AIR-CONDITIONING UNITS April 12, 1978 Mr. Dahl stated that the first ordinance is based on the City of Upland's zoning requirements though the ordinance proposed is more lenient. Mr. Stevens stated that staff would like to have more time to review this ordinance and come back with their recommendations. Regarding the second ordinance, Mr. Dahl stated that this matter was brought up because of the lack of design standards to cover air-conditioning units. He felt that such an ordinance was desirable during the interim period. Mrs. Mary Barlow stated that such an ordinance is needed in the interim and hoped that the city would carefully consider this until the design standards have been developed. Mr. Joe DiIorio stated that he felt this_was not required since housing development has been held back for a while. Mr. Ken Willis stated that this might cause an economic discrimination in the moderate income housing market. Commissioners Dahl and Garcia expressed concern over what appears to be profiteering on the part of developers and expressed their desire to insure that'homebuyers were receiving the most out'.of their investment as well as maintaining the aesthetic desires of the community. ACTION: On motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue these ordinances to May 10, 1978. Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn to a combined meeting with the City Council on April 19, 1978 at 4:00 p. m. - 5 - .. '"CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION March 22, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on Wednesday, March 22, 1978, at 7:30 p.m. in the Community Service Building. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Herman Rempel and opened with the pledge of allegiance. Commissioners Present: H. Rempel, R. Dahl, J. Garcia, L. Jones, P. Tolstoy Commissioners Absent: None CORRECTIONS;TO MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 1978 Regarding the "Proposed Sign Ordinance" ADD: The representative from Pacific Outdoor Advertising indicated that they would like to work with the Planning Commissioners to develop a model sign ordinance. Mr. Tolstoy requested that they furnish a copy of list of cities 'in=which they have assisted in the ordinance. He also requested that input from the made to the Planning Commission in writing. ACTION: On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia voted to approved the minutes of the regular meet PUBLIC HEARING: LOCATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER;~'INDEX'N0. W86-66 ~ '` Northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian (Douglas & Kathleen Hone/Douglas Gorgen) the model ordinance as well as a preparation of the model sign outdoor advertising firm be and unanimously carried, it was Cng of March 8, 1978, as corrected. Associate Planner Doug Payne reported that the applicant is proposing to 'establish a restaurant in conjunction with a Neighborhood Shopping Center. The 3.55 acre site is relatively flat sloping from the north to the south. The Chaffey Community General Plan designates the site as Commercial-Neighborhood. The Environ- mental Review Committee on February 22, 1978 determined that this project would have a non-significant affect on the environment and a negative declaration was filed. Mr. Payne presented the staff report in further detail. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Douglas Hone, applicant, spoke in favor of his application. Mr. Garcia requested a clarification.on the amount of landscaping to be done in the project. Mr. Hone stated that the County T-standard required 5% landscaping but that they are landscaping 14% of the site in this project. Mr. Tolstoy brought up the question of the drainage. He stated that when the property was a citrus grove, much of the rainfall was absorbed. With the proposed development and amount of paving for parking on the site, the drainage will be a concern. The engineer for Mr. Hone stated that they followed the natural drainage into 19th Street and Carnelian and about 2/3 of the water would drain into Carnelian. The water draining, into 19th Street is proposed to be channelled through Amberwood. Mr. Hunter stated that a uniform storm drainage fee proposal is under considera- tion by the city and recommended that any action of the Planning Commission include that the applicant be required to pay any storm drainage fees which the city sets. This would be based upon areas lost through natural absorption and will not include landscaped areas. He then reported on proposed drainage projects which will channel.: rainfall north of 19th Street to the Cucamonga Creek to help de-water many of the severely flooded streets in the community. - 1 - .. • ~ • Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 22, 1978 PUBLIC HEARING: (cont'd) LOCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER, INDEX N0. W86-66 Discussion was raised regarding the parking standards. Mrs. Jones stated that the 18' parking distance for parking along the structures makes it difficult to park ai~car. Mr. Payne reported that the County requires 19' and this would be acquired by the 1' overhang in front of the parking stalls. Mr. Tolstoy asked if residents on the west will have to look at air conditioning units on .the structures and expressed concern with the noise from the units. Mr. Hone stated that the air conditioning units will be screened and the noise level will met OSHA requirements. Mr. Garcia asked what is being done to contribute towards a traffic signal at 19th Street and Carnelian. Mr. Hunter stated that a signal is being planned for the intersection with the State paying 50% and the City matching 50% of the costs. Mr. Garcia expressed concern .over... types "of businesses to be proposed in the center such ,as a laundramat=type of operation. with respect to sewer allocations. Mr. Hone indicated that there would be no laundramats-and that the restaurant would probably require the. greatest amount'of sewer u§z,'rl" :`_.~... Mr. Garcia expressed concern with the traffic circulation. Mr. Dick Thompson representing the county engineer staff, stated that they have worked with the developers on this and were comfortable with it. Mr. Garcia also inquired about the public transportation needs (e.g., bus stops, etc.). It was stated that the Subdivision Committee did'not address this concern. Mr. Payne stated+stfiat_staff requests that the approval of the signs be deleted from the action until the sign ordinance as been developed. Mr. Hunter recommended that the project comply with a uniform drainage fee which will be established within 90 days. _ _ _ -- There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed'.y ___ ACTION: On motion by Dahl, seconded by Jones, it was moved to approve Site Approval Index No. W86-66 to establish a Neighborhood Shopping Center subject to the conditions and findings as stated in the staff report with the stipulation that the applicant contribute to a drainage fee which will be set within 90 days. Mr. Garcia moved and Mr. Dahl seconded to amend the motion as follows: (1) that 14% of the project be landscaped; (2) that all trash areas be totally screened; (3) that the irrigation be on an automatic system; and (4) that this action excludes the approval of signs for the development at this time. The motion to approve this item was unanimously carried, as amended. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE GRANGE FROM R-3 TO C-1,._INDEX N0. W97-85';"APPROX. 2~4'- S/0 ARROW ROUTE; APPROX: 332''E/0 ARCHIBALD AVENUE (Chino Basin P4uriicipal Water District) Mr. Doug Payne reported that the applicant requests a zone change to the C-1 district on an irregular shaped 5.5 acre site, generally located. on the s/e corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The C-1 zone is requested to permit an expansion of the parking area for the Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) general offices, as well as for other future commercial uses. _ 2 _ • / • Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 22, 1978 PUBLIC HEARING: (cont'd) ZONE CHANGE INDEX N0. W97-85 Mr. Hunter stated that this proposed zone change would affect the General Plan. It.involves commercial zoning along Archibald and a public facility in the area. He recommended that this item b'e continued until after the adoption of the General Plan. The Chairman declared the hearing open. A representative from CBWD, the applicant, spoke in favor of the zone change. He stated that they lacked sufficient parking for their building and wish to use part of the total site'for additional parking. There being no further testimony, the Chairman declared the hearing closed. Mr. Dahl asked if the applicant would be willing to hold back the request until the General Plan is completed. The applicant stated that he would have to take this back to the Board for further .consideration. ACTION: On motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl-and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue the zone change request, index no. 97-85 to the April 12, 1978 Planning Commission Meeting to allow the CBMWD Board to determine whether they would wish to continue their request until after the adoption of the General Plan. 'PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1-5 TO R-1-20,000, INDEX N0. W85-49 N/S OF VACATED ALMOND ST., APPROX. 385.91' E/O. CARNELIAN ST. (Gertrude Hartman) Mr. Payne reported that the applicant is requesting a zone change from A-1-5 to R-1-20,000 to permit construction of single-family equestrian oriented homes. He~gaveca,:detailed report the of staff's findings and recommendations. The .Chairman declared the hearing open. Mr. Frank Williams of Associated Engineers, representing the applicant, spoke in favor of the zone change: He stated that the property is consistent with the General Plan and that the zone change request was not premature since the surrounding uses are R-1-20,000. Mr. Andrew Barmakian, architect for the project, spoke in favor of the request. and gave a brief description of the proposed development. Mr. Antlocer, Chairman of 'the Planning Committee of the Aita Loma Chamber of Commerce, spoke in opposition to the project stating that this item should not be approved-until after the General Plan has been established. Mr. Dan August, property owner south of the project, spoke in opposition and stated 'that he would like to see the proposed plan before the zone change is made. Mr. Pat Case spoke .in opposition. Mrs. Jones asked if the area is'in a high fire hazard area. Chief Billings of the Foothill Fire District stated that it is and'that low density developments are recommended in 'watershed areas. There being no further testimony, the chairman 'declared 'the hearing closed. ACTION: On motion by Garcia, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue the zone change request, index no. W85-49 to July 26, 1978 so that the project can be approved after':the adoption of the General Plan. At 9:50 p.m., the Chairman called a recess. At 10:00 p.m., the meeting was reconvened. - 3 - • / • Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM C-1 TO C-2, INDEX N0. 81-82 E/S OF GROVE AVE., BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO & RANCHERIA DRIVE (Francis/More) March 22, 1978 Mr. Payne reported that the applicant is requesting a change 'of zone from C-1 to C-2_on 3.06 acres 'td permit a bank and related development or mobile home sales. He.completed the staff report indicating staff's findings and recommendations on the project. The Chairman declare the hearing open. Mr. Bert Francis, applicant, spoke in. favor of the zone change. Mr. Garcia asked the applicant for the anticipated completion date for the project. Mr. Francis stated that he did not have a date. Mrs. Jones asked as to what other uses the applicant desired which required the zone change. The applicant stated they wanted a storage facility. Mr. Lew Welk spoke in opposition to-the zone change stating his objection to the mix uses of commercial and residential dwellings in the area. There being no further testimony, the chairman declared the hearing closed. ACTION: On motion by Dahl, seconded .by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to deny the change`of zone request, index no. 81-82 based on the following finding: (1) The City is in the process of reviewing an ordinance regarding commercial uses and zones and this item should be reviewed after the ordinance has been adopted. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2 to C-2, INDEX N0. W85-86 N/E CORNER. OF BAKER'AVE. & 9TH STREET (McCutchan & Associates, Inc.) Mr. Payne presented the staff report stating that the applicant is requesting a zone change for R-2 to C-2 to accommodate general commercial uses. The site is situated between residential and commercial•/light industrial uses. He stated five concers and staff's findings 'for recotmuending that the zone change be denied. The chairman declared-the hearing open. Mr. Tom McCutchan, applicant;. spoke in favor of the project. He stated that about 5;000 dwelling units can be developed around the site and that there was a need for a neighborhood shopping center. City Attorney Dougherty stated that 'the neighborhood market use is allowed ~in the C-1 zone and~that the major objections to the proposed zone change area for uses allowed in the C-2 zone. He asked if the applicant would object to amending his application to a C-1 zone. Mr. McCutchan stated he would'be willing to verbally amend his application to a C-1 zone. Mr. Dougherty stated that'it would be'approprite to'give staff time to review the applicant's amendment for a'C-l.zone. Pastor James Smith of a neighboring church spoke in opposition to this item and expressed hisconcern regarding the inadequate streets,~nearby schools and the mix uses~of residential and commercial uses in the area. Mr. John March stated that the traffic is bad but that there was a need for a neighborhood store. - 4 - i ~.. ' Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 22, 1978 PUBLIC HEARING: (cont'd) ZONE CHANGE INDEX N0. W85-86 Mrs. .Lillian Miller spoke 'in favor of"the zone:_change stating that more revenues would be gained for the city'and the roads would be fixed. There being no further testimony, the chairman declared the hearing closed. ACTION: On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was voted to deny the zone change;•index no. W85-86, based on the following finding: (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is in the process of preparing a new general plan and a'.zone change to general commercial at this time would be premature. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE TO CREATE TWO (2) LOTS, ONE HAVING LESS THAN THE MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENTS, INDEX N0. W87-51, N/S OF HIDDEN FARM ROAD, APPROX. 45' E/0 CARNELIAN AVENUE (Walter White) Planning staff member John Perevuznik reported that the applicant is seeking a variance to crease 2 lots, one lot less than the minimum area requirement of the R-1-20,000 zone. The deficient lot would be 'approximately 13,300 sq. ft. (discount- ing easements). The Subdivision Review Committee made a finding that the project did not receive an affirmative response to all primary considerations, specifically schools. The Chairman declared the hearing open. Mrs. Gail White, applicant, spoke in favor of the application giving a brief history and 'description of their request. She".:stated that they planned to build a home comparable to theirs on the lot and that there were extraordinary circumstances for their request (e.g., the great amount~of road:.improvements). Mr. Henry Martinez, resident on Hidden Farm Road, spoke in opposition to the zone variance stating that the square footage is far below that which is required in the area and that this might set a precedent for future property owners. ,.Others speaking in opposition to. this item were - Mr. Dave Henderson Mr. Gino Simoni Mr. Mel Luftbraer The following people spoke in favor of the variance - Mr. Dan August Mr. Pat Case Mr. Machinski Mr. Robert Luthanski There being no further 'testimony, the chairman declared the hearing closed. Mrs. Jones asked staff if people north of this property could request variances for substandard lots. The staff answered in the affirmative. Mr. Tolstoy expressed his sympathy with the applicant but held that the expecta- tions of the neighboring property owners must be considered as well as water and sewage problems. Mr. Dahl stated that a variance of this type would-not allow animals. - 5 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd ) March 22, 1978 PUBLIC-HEARING• (c ont'd) ZONE VARIANCE, INDEX N0. W87-51 ACTION: On'motion by Tolstoy, seconded .by Jones and carried'by the following vote - AYES: Tolstoy, Jones, Garcia; NOES: Rempel; ABSTAINING: Dahl, it was voted to deny the zone variance request, index no. W87-51, based on_the findings that the surrounding property owners purchased the properties with the expectations of minimum 'Z acres; the concerns 'and problems ofcesspool and environmental factors; and,-based on the finding-that the conditions of section 61.0220(b) have not been met. Mr. Dahl stated that he abstained from voting because he resides.in~the immediate vicinity of the requested zone variance. The Chairman called for a short break at 11:45 p.m. At 11:55 p.m., the Chairman reconvened the meeting. MINOR SUBDIVISION N0. W78-0046I APPROX. 750' E/0 HELLMAN BETWEEN 8TH & 9TH STREETS (Albert W. Davis) Mr. Perevuznik reported that the applicant is seeking to create two industrial parcels and-+stated the findings of the Subdivision Review Committee as well as the conditions for staff's recommendation of approval of this request. Mr. Tolstoy requested that condition ll7 regarding flood hazards to the property be transmitted to prospective purchasers of the lots. Mr. Perevuznik stated that this condition could be placed on the parcel maps to inform purchasers of the hazards. Mr. Don Peters, the applicant's engineer for-the project, requested that it be a 3 lot split subdivision because of a proposed road to be constructed'through~the subdivision. The applicant verbally agreed to amend his request for a three rather than a two lot split. ACTION: On motion by Jones, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried it was voted to approve the Minor Subdivision'No. W78-0046I for a three lot split subject_to the conditions and findings as recommended by staff and with the provision that condition I{7 of the staff report be added to the parcel map for each lot. TENTATIVE TRACT~NO. 9583 (REVISED), 49 LOTS on 49.6 ACRES E/0 HAVEN AVE., APPROX. 1000' N/0 WILSON AVENUE (Deer Creek Development Co./Madole & Associates, Inc.) and PHASING OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 9584 INTO TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 9584-1, 9584-2, 9584-3, E/S of HAVEN, APPROX. 1500' N/0 WILSON AVENUE (Deer Creek Development/Madole & Associates) Planning staff member John Perevuznik gave the staff report on these two items. Ae stated that on December 16, 1976 the San Bernardino Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 9583 and that subsequent changes in the alignment of an outlet channel located north of this site has necessitated a revision of the originally approved tract map. The Environmental Review~Committee reviewed the development and issued a Notice of Negative Declaration. In addition, the site is not located within a designated high fire hazard area. - 6 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 22, 1978 TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 9583 (cont'd) Mr. Garcia asked~if an Ehvironmental'Impact Report had been prepared for the development. Staff reported that the Subdivision Review Committee determined that the development would have a non-significant effect on the environment and filed a Negative Declaration for the tract. Mr. Garcia stated his concern that an Environmental Impact Report had not been required for this development because of the size}as well as the impact of the development in-the proposed site. Mr. Harold Sims of Deer Creek Development spoke on behalf of the development and briefly described the proposed plans. Mr. Tolstoy expressed his concern that'the city was not informed by the County Flood Control District of the proposed channel north of this project. Mr. Tony -Zenes stated that the County Corp of Engineers designed the'dike which is almost completed. Mr. Tolstoy requested a presentation by the Flood Control on the dike which is almost completed.. Mr. Thompson representing the County Engineer stated that they have seen the plans and feel that it is adequate. Mr. Garcia inquired about the school problem. Mr. Sims stated that the development would phase in with the schools over a 5 year period. Mr. Garcia also expressed his concern for open space within the project. Mr. Zenes stated that the area north of the dike would probably be held as open space by the County and that 20' equestrian trails are"_being planned for in front of the homes to be maintained by the homeowner'sassociation. Mr. Garcia expressed concern over homeowner assocations.with.tfie?prospect of the city having to take it over in the future. Mr. Dougherty stated that because of their prior iaork'on this project~::he:c.would recommend that the Commission appoint a counsel'of their choice to study this. Mr. Holly stated that the covenants and restrictions of the association should be reviewed by the city. ACTION: On motion by Garcia, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue these items to April 26, 1978 in order to received the presentation from the County Flood Control 'District on the dike as well as to obtain the recommendation from the legal counsel on homeowner associations. Chairman:Rempel selected Attorney Maroney to'prepare the report on the home- owners association. TENTATIVE TRACT'9193 &_-:9262, REQUEST FOR 81 SEWER HARDSHIP ALLOCATIONS, E/S OF VINEYARD AVENUE, S/0 CANDLEWOOD (Trinity Development Co.) Mr. Hunter .stated that there are numerous amounts of harship cases affecting small lot subdivisions and recommended that they be allowed to be file to clear the back log of these cases. Mr. Tolstoy stated that there is a problem with the definition of "hardship" which needs to be resolved. Mr. Lloyd Michael from the Cucamonga County Water District stated that they have never recognized hardship cases and that it would be difficult to determine hardships. He suggested that perhaps a points system be considered. - 7 - ' ~ ! Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 28, 1978 TENTATIVE TRACT 9193 & 9262 (cont'd) Mr. Tolstoy asked if there is a 'valid list of people who have filed for 'sewer:.allocations for small lots (less than 4). Mr. Hunter stated that we do not have such a list. Mr. Joe DLIorio spoke in favor of Tentative Tract 9193-& 9262 requesting 81 sewer hardship allocations for-this development. He referred to his March 8, 1978 letter to the City Council stating the reasons why his development should be allowed this request. ACTION: On motion by Garcia', seconded 'by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted that ;July; 12, 1978 be the date set .for a public hearing to review sewer allocation hardship cases. POLICY ITEM - ORDINANCE REQUIRING ADMINISTRATIVE SITE REVIEW OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Mi.. Hunter stated that the Planning Commission had requested the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance providing for director's review :for certain,business and - , ,,,. manufactnring.uses:,_;He stated that this is an urgency ordinance. Mr. Dougherty described in detail the proposed-.ordinance: Mr. Garcia expressed concern over planning-items which he felt perhaps should be approved by the Planning Commission rather than the Planning Director. Mr. Dougherty stated that the 'Planning Director would, of course, refer matters which he-felt should be heard before the Planning Commission. He:~stated'that the ordinance `'was designed to help alleviate some of the demands being placed on the Commission. Mr..Rempel stated that we must place our trust in the staff to use their proper discretion: Mr: Payne stated that all direct 'items are appealable to the Planning Commission. ACTION: On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to recommend approval to'`tlie City~Council:of the urgency ordinance providing for drector's.review_for.certain business and manufacturing uses. POLICY ITEM - ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING INTERIM 'DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. Mr. Dougherty gave a detailed report of the proposed replacement ordinance of County Ordinance 2179. He added an amendment which"~included~'public~uses:.under:section 2. Mr. Dahl expressed concern over the issuance of grading permits. Mr. Dougherty stated that.staff::.felt~a hat this was adequately covered in the subdivision ordinance. He did .not 'f eel that this should'be tied to building permits. ACTION: On motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to recommend approval to the City Council of the urgency ordinance establishing interim development review procedures for subdivision applications, as amended by the City Attorney. Commissioner Dahl presented 2 ordinances to staff indicating his desire to see them placed on.the next Planning Commission Agenda. On motion by Rempel, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, itwas voted to change the time of the Planning Commission Meeting to 7:00 p.m. On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn the meeting at 2:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~ _ 8 _ !~uzann" Ota, Interim Secretary -- --~~; -~~ -^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING - PLANNING COMMISSION March 8, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met in a regular session on Wednesday, March 8, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Service Building. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Peter Tolstoy who opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance. Members present: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Herman Rempel, Peter Tolstoy Members absent: None INSTALLATION OF COMMISSIONERS Interim City Clerk Ken Hunter administered the oath of office to the first members of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission: Richard Dahl, Sorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Herman Rempel and Peter Tolstoy. SELECTION OF CHAIRMAN & VICE-CHAIRMAN Upon motion by !Jones., seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it•.was:voted to appoint Herman Rempel_as..Chairman of: the Rancho~Cucamonga.~.P~anning:~Commission. Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to appoint Jorge Garcia as Vice-Chairman of the Planning Commission. PRESENTATION Mr. Hunter introduced Upland Planning Commission Chairman Frank Carpenter. Mr. Carpenter on behalf of the Upland Planning Commission congratulated the Commissioners on their new appointment and presented Chairman Rempel with a gavel to be used at their meetings. The Commissioners expressed their appreciation to the Upland Planning Commission and indicated their desire of•workingc;dlosely with their neighboring city of Upland. TERMS OF OFFICE Mr. Hunter conducted a drawing for terms of off ice for the Planning Commission. A roll call was called and the terms of office were determined as follows: Dahl - 2 years Garcia - 2 years Tolstoy - 4 years Jones - 4 years Rempel - 4 years Mayor Frost expressed the City Council's appreciation for the Commissioners' dedicated efforts to serve their new city. APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM SECRETARY Mr. Hunter reported that the Planning Director is normally the secretary of the Planning Commission. Until such appointment, he recommended that Suzanne Ota be appointed as Interim Secretary. Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried it was voted to appoint Suzanne Ota as Interim Secretary. Chairman Rempel at this time introduced newly appointed City Manager Lauren Wasserman. Mr. Wasserman is presently the City Administrator of the city of Montclair. City Attorney Robert Dougherty recommended that the Planning Commission proceed with discussion of Item 118. - 1 - ' Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 8, 1978 CONTRACT WITH A CONSULTANT TO COMPLETE THE GENERAL PLAN Mr. Hunter reported that the staff has been consulting with the County Planning Department on the General Plan for the city. The Planning Commission has reviewed resumes from seven consultants for professional services to complete the city's General Plan. Discussion was held regarding the agreement for professional services with Jbhn:Blayney Associates. Mr. Hunter reviewed the State mandated elements which will be covered in the agreement and stated that many of the other elements will be developed along with city's zoning code and county adopted elements. Chief Billings of the Foothill Fire District reported on the studies by Public Technology, Inc. regarding fire stations .which will be incorporated into the agree- ment. He pointed out the locations of~the fire stations and described the reasons for their location. He stated that they will work with the consultant to incorporate the information obtained from Public Technology, Inc. regarding fire facilities. Furtheri.discussioh'was'held concerning the scale of the plan, the number of copies required and the completion of. the zoning code. Mr. Hunter reported that it would be recommended that no action be taken on the zoning code until funding for the work was assured. He stated that the city will be eligible in August for Revenue Sharing funds which could possibly be used for this purpose. Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, it was moved to appoint two commissioners to work with staff in preparing a report to the City Council outlining their reasons why John Blayney Associates should be selected as the consultant to complete the city's General Plan rather than the"_firm of Williams, Platzek and Mocine of Sausalito, California. Mr. Garcia stated the Planning Commission's reasons for their decision before the public. Chairman Rempel appointed Mr. Garcia and himself to prepare this report with staff. APPROVAL OF ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF SITE APPROVALS FOR SUBDIVISION SIGNS AND TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMITS Mr. Doug Payne, Associate"Planner for the County Planning Department presented the staff report to ,the Commission as outlined in their March 2, 1978 memo on these items. He explained the requirements and standards for the temporary occupancy permits (TOP) and site approval (SA).and the County's procedure that requests for time extensions exceeding 12 months must be approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Payne reported in detail the recommendations of the Planning Staff for the approval of Item 7(a). Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried it was voted` to approve a one (1) year extension of the following site approvals for subdivisional~ signs and temporary occupancy permits subject to'cbnditions and findings as stated in the Planning .Department's staff memo dated March 2, 1978. The conditions of the original approval to remain valid. S.A. 87-67: Crowell/Leventhall, n/e corner of 19th and Carnelian S.A. 81-66: Crowell/Leventhall, n/w corner of 19th and Sapphire S.A. 87-73: Crowell/Leventhall, s/e corner of Carnelian and Baseline S.A. 90-66: Crowell/Leventhall,. n/w. corner of 19th and Beryl T.O.P. 104-67: Lewis Homes, n/w corner of 19th and Haven T.O.P. 94-82: J.C. Heers, e/s of Helms, approx. 660' s/o Foothill __. . T. 0': P. 82-53: Crowell/Leventhall, n/w corner of Sapphire and Whirlaway - 2 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) T.O.P. 86-62: T.O.P. 93-62: T.O.P. 91-63: T.O.P. 100-62 T.O.P. 96-92: DENIAL OF A-T AND TEMPORARY March 8, 1978 Crowell/Leventhall, e/s of Carnelian, approx. 150' n/o Lemon J. Chavanne, s/e corner of Apricot and Hellman Lewis Homes, s/e corner of Beryl and Orange Vanguard, n/e corner of Dartinouth-:and.:Lemon S. Lusk, n/s of 6th, approx. 600' w/o Archibald XTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL FC SIGN . _ \ _,_-- Mr. Payne presented the staff report for 'Item 7(b) stating the`reasons for staff's recommendation that the site approvals and temporary occupancy permits under_this•-item be denied by the Planning Commission. Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to deny a time extension for the following site approval for subdivision directional sign and temporary occupancy permits„subject to the .findings as stated in the Planning Department's staff memo dated March 2, 1978: S.A. 97-66: Inco Homes, n/e corner of 19th and Archibald T.O.P. 105-77: Lewis Homes, n/w corner of Haven and Church T.O.P. 91-68: Lewis Homes, n/e corner of Beryl and Orange T.O.P. 100-76: Lewis Homes, e/s of Yew, approx. 100''e/o Kahai At 8:53 p.m. a short break was called for by Chairman Rempel. At 9:OO.p.m., the Planning Commission reconvened in .regular session. ORDINANCE REQUIRING ADMINISTRATIVE SITE REVIEW OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Mr. Dougherty reported on the draft ordinance requiring administrative site review of commercial and industrial development. He recommended that this draft ordinance be reviewed and :that+the Commission refer to the zoning code in determining whether the ordinance reflects the desired sites and uses which should be subject to review. Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried it::was voted to receive. this draft ordinance for review and to refer this matter to the next meeting for discussion and further consideration. AMENDMENTS TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ORDINANCE 2179 & REPORT ON SEWER ALLOCATION PROGRAM ' Mr. Hunter recommended that items 10 and 11 be considered as one item. He reported ~~~:: that the City Council has set a special hearing. on March 29, 1978 to extend County codes which have not been replaced by the city. Staff feels that San Bernardino County Ordinance 2179 should be under city control. The legal staff has taken the ordinance and described it as a city ordinance. No policy changes have been made so as to leave it up to the City Council and Planning Commission. Ih':regards"to the Sewer Allocation Program „ Mr. Hunter reported that all of the cities in the program as well as the Cucamonga County Water District have agreed that commercial, industrial and office buildings (which includes churches and schools) which do not require provisions for industrial waste should not be subject to the sewer allocation provisions under County Ordinance 2179. Mr. Dahl requested that if this is to be adopted that all uses be clearly spelled out and that churches be inserted into the ordinance. - 3 - Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 8, 1978 Mr. Hunter stated that~the city has received a letter from the City of Upland, dated February 17, 1978, which recommends the adoption of the aforementioned sewer allocation policy. Mr. Lloyd Michael, Manager of Cucamonga County Water District reported the District's position on this policy. He also passed out a draft of the District's recommended amendments on Ordinance 2179. Mr. Garcia stated that items 1110 and lhl relating to design con§iderations oP the ordinance are very important and should be given high priority. Mr. Stevens of the County'Planning Staff reported on staff's recommended amend- ments to Ordinance 2179. Mr. Joe Diorio'stated his concern with the short and long term design considerations. The Planning Commissioners stated their desire for more time to discuss this matter. Mr.. Stevens indicated that he would prepare the next agenda to allow for additional time to review this item. On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue Item 1110 to the March 22, 1978 Planning Commission Meeting. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Mr. Hunter reported on the amendments to the proposed Subdivision Ordinance and stated thaE ffiis was not an urgency ordinance. Mr. Dougherty recommended that the Planning Commission consider this proposed ordinance in looking at the County- Ordinance-2179_. ~ On motion by Jones, seconded by Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to a meeting in April and to have the proposed Subdivision Ordinance reviewed 6y the Commissioners as they consider...Ordinance 2179.-~ ~_ , PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE Mr. Hunter reported on the proposed sign ordinance and indicated that it was - not an urgency ordinance. Mr. Fred Guido of Pacific Outdoor Advertising addressed the Commission and introduced representatives from Foster and Kleiser, Hayward Sign and Kuhn Sign Companies. They stated their concern over the proposed sign ordinance because it would eliminate outdoor advertising. He requested that they be allowed to present a model ordinance which they have helped to 'prepare in other cities. Mr. Garcia stated that if 'billboards are not properly addressed, numerous problems can arise. Mr. Doug Hone stated that the sign ordinance will also have ~to be considered. with the subdivision ordinance. He asked that the sign ordinance be forwarded to the Chambers of Commerce for review. Mr. Hayward of Hayward Signs spoke regarding political signs. He stated that many cities require 32 sq. ft. and perhaps a larger size might be in order in the city's sign ordinance. Mr. Marshal Wilkenson of Property Investment West requested that the size of non- illuminated signs be broadened. Mr. [,Tasserman reiterated Mr. Hunter's suggestion that the Planning Commission recommendations'be made in writing. Upon motion by Jones, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was voted to continue this item to the April'12, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. - 4 - ~~y- Planning Commission Meeting (cont'd) March 8, 1978 EDISON TRANSMISSION LINE DISCUSSION Mr. Hunter reported that a letter has been 'received requesting comments from the Planning Commission regarding the Edison transmission lines which will run through Rancho Cucamonga. The matter will be heard by the Public Utilities Com- mission on March 28, 1978. Further discussions were held on this item, and Mr. Hunter stated that he would work with the city attorney to prepare a letter to the Edison Company outlining the comments from the Planning Commission. nre nTreeTnnT Chairman Rempel reported that the American Institute of Planners will be holding a conference on March 17, 1978. Mr. Hunter stated he would check into this. Mr. Garcia asked if anything had been done on the design of the city logo. Mr. Hunter reported that this item will be referred to the new City Manager for action. There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, on motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn at 11:10 p.m. Suzanne Ota Interim Secretary - 5 -