Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/12/16 - Agenda Packet
City Councll PAGE 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda lust be in writing. no deadline for submitting theta items is 5:00 P.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Call: Brown Buquet Stout _, King _, and WrigFt-_. B. ANNCUIICEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS None submitted. C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noi- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by it Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: October 1, 1987 November 18, 1987 2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 12/2/87 and 12/9/87 1 and Payroll ending 11/25/87 and 12/10/87 for the total amount of $3,457,343.15, 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General 9 Eating Place, New Friend Chinese Restaurant, Michael 8 Philip Lao, 7890 Haven Avenue, Unfts 15 and 16. 4. Approval to amend Resident Inspector Contract (CO 87- 30 133) to increase amount of field order change approval. 5 Approval to authorize staff to approve change order 12 requests (CO 87 -171) for the Civic Center and Public Safety facility project consistent with the procedures of present public works contracts policy. r° (Y 5% City Council Agenda December 16, 1987 PAGE 2 6. Approval to authorize the transfer of remaining 14 appropriations from the Special assessment Districts to the General Fund. 7. Approval to designate Brigit Tate, Risk Management 15 Technician. as alternate representative on the Board of Directors of the California Municipal Insurance Authority. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -561 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANNGA, CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING AN ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY 8. Agreement with Southern California Gas Company 17 authorizing Mayor to sign franchise fee agreements on behalf of City. 9. Approval to receive and file letters from Rancho 22 Disposal, Yukon Disposal, and Western Waste requesting annual rate review be deferred until such time as San Bernardino County adjusts the solid waste landfill site fees. 10. Approval to upgrade Junior Programmer and 26 Prograarcer /Operator positions within the Management Information Service area to programmer level position and setting the salary fenge code steps at 387 -437 ($2,387-53,063 monthly). Funding will be from account 33- 4130 -1100 (Resource Center Regular Payroll), and will have no impact on 1987 -88 budget allocation for this activity. 11. Approval to authr.rize the City of Rancho Cucamonga to 29 Redeem Bonds, Publ sh and mail Notice of Redemption for Surplus Funds 0thi.n The Storm Drain Channel (86 -2) for approximately $95,000. 12. Approval of Parcel Map 10617 located on the south side 32 of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, submitted by BCE Developme,:t. W asl� , - A SM 0 0 ti� r City Council Agenda A/0 December 16, 1987 PAGE 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97.662 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10617 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10617) 13. Approval to allocate available fund balance ($147,914) 35 in SB -300 for slurry seal programs. 14. Approval of partial release of a portion of a Real 36 Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for lots 8, 9, 10, 11 of Parcel Nap 6725, located south of Foothill Boulevard north of Arrow Highway, between Red Oak Street and Elm Avenue, submitted by BCE nevelopment. RESOLUTION NO. 87-663 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCHGA. CALIFORNIA, FOR A PARTIAL RELEASE OF A PORTION OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEME.IT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM BCE DEVELOPMENT 15. Approval of the Environo -ntal Initial Study Parts I and 39 11 for the proposed Slurry Seal Program 1987 -88 (Phase I) for various City streets and approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -664 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THt ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM 1987 -88 (PHASE I) FOR VARIOUS CITY STREETS 16. Approval of Maps. Agreements for Postponement of 65 Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tracts 13440, 13441, 13442, and 13445 located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by The William Lyon Company. 111% City Council Agenda t •Y December 16, 1987 PAGE _ 4 n+� i•. tt RESOLUTION N0. 87665 67 � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING x IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442, AND 13445 f RESOLUTION NO. b7-666 69 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE •'10 AGREEMENTS WITH THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442 AND 13445 17. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -216) for the 70 Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement project located between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard, awarded to Fontana Paving, Incorporated for the amount of $104,89c.40 to be funded from Systems r Development Fund. 18. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -i: ?) for the Traffic 71 Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue, and Carnelian Street at Red hill Country Club Drive Improvement Project, awarded to Moore Electric contracting for the amount of $133,777.00 to be funded from TOA, Article 8 funds. 19. Approval to execute contract (CO 87 -218) for the Traffic 72 Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard and Base Line road at Spruce Street Improvement Project, awarded to Hovey Electric, Incorporated for the amount of $215,984.00 to be funded from TDA, Article 8 funds. 20 Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion far: CR 84 -18 - located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, 73 I south of 7th Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 73,981 �rvFN ti Yq'Ami City Council Agend December 16, 198 PAGE 5 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -667 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 84 -18 A ^ AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Ot COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 85 -10 - located between Amethyst Street and Archibald 75 Avenue south of Wilson Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f 60,000 F RESOLUTION NO. 87-668 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85 -10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 86 -19 - located on the Utica Avenue south of Jersey 77 ou6 levard. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $146,000 RESOLUTION NU. 87 -669 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK OR 86 -21 - located on the northeast corner of Utica 79 venla ue and Jersey Boulevard. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 8,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -670 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 86 -21 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WJRK IN, PAGE City Council Agend�j _ December 16, 198 6 _* DR 84 -48 - located on the Northeast corner of Utica 81 venue and 60 Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) i 7,500 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -671 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 84 -48 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CUP 85 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Foothill 83 ou6 e—f yard and Ramona Avenue. Faith.,., Performance Bond (Street) $ 66,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87-672 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 85 -01 AND AUTHORIZING 14E FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 12184 - located on the east side of Beryl Street 85 south of Base Line Road. Faithful Performance Band (Street) $267,000 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -673 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12184 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 21 Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond far: Trace 12801 -1 - located on the south side of Banyan 87 met west of Beryl Street. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 18,800 n- _* City Council Agenda PAGE 7 Tract 12721 - located on the east side of Vineyard 88 venue snot of Foothill Boulevard. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 5,100 22. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 89 Security for MDR 87 -40 located on the cast side of Beryl Street between Base Line Road and lath Street, submitted by Michael Pfannenstiel. RESOLUTION NO. 87-674 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -40 23. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 92 Security for DR 86 -14 located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Arrow Route and Civic Center Drive, submitted by Haven Investors I. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -675 93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AI'^ROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT /110 IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -14 24. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 95 Security for street improvements an Haven Avenue, between Church Street and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, a General Partnership. RESOLUTION 110. 87 -676 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD 25. Approval of Acceptance of Real Property Improvement 98 Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 87 -219) from Brad R. Hastings, for a single family residence, located on the east side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Read. Ai y • +� - PACE e h •' �� City Council Agend 198 _ = 8 December 16, r FA 99 RESOLUTION No. 87 -677 TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cl)Y ,.t OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING AREAL P•:OPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREFAENT FROM BRAD R. HASTINGS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND g, CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SANE 101 26. Approval ra execute Contract Lhange Order No. 1 (CO 87- 13) with Wilson- Sheenan and Associates for the additional scope of work for Amethyst Street -19th Street Improvement Project to provide storm drain plans, specifications and estimates not includel in the original scope of work. The amount not tc exceed - $10,124.00, will bring the contract total to (24,532.00 to be funded from Systems Development Fund. 27 aEntryyaMonuments (const(ruction 103 r 46)f or Archibald Avenue drawings) with Forma for an additional fee cf Five Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars ($5,260.00) being paid from Beautification Funds. ' 28. Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public 105 Improvement and Dedication (CO 87 -) between Julia H. {c Priego a d the City of F echo Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9624 Arrow Route, located on the north side of Arrow Route between Archibald and i u me r. RESOLUTION NO. 87.678 106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Ct.LIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JULIA H. PRIEGO, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY I I CLERK TO SIGN SAME r W/ Jzn9 1 Ci ty Council Agenda December 16, 1987 PAGE 9 29. Approval of a Drainage Acceptance Agreement (CO 87 -220), 107 Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 87 -221) and Improvemnt Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 87 -09 located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Schlosser Forge Company and Phillip D., Elaine M., Jeffrey P. and Jacqueline L. Schlosser and Albert W. and Poberta J. Holquin. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -679 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A RE}1 PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PHILIP 0., ELAINE M., JEFFREY P. AND JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER AND ALBERT H. AND ROBERTA J. HOLQUIN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK -0 SIGN SAME RESOLUTION NO. 87-680 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUJNCI,- OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT AND AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -09 30. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services 112 Agreement (CO 87 -222) with Inland Planning Group, d.b.a. Planning Network, for the Development and Preparation of the Technical Update to the Environmental Impact Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The maximum fee is $22,000 to be funded from Community Services /Planning Contract Services furd. 31. Approval of the Professional Services Agreement (CO 87- 131 223) between the City r' Rancho Cucamonga and La Belle - Marvin, Incorporated, for Soils Investigation and Pavement Evaluation and Analysts for Haven Avenue between the North and South City Limits and for Fourth Street (westbound lanes only) between the East and West City Limits. The not -to- exceed fee of $15,672.00 will be funded by System Development. ^ °c City Council A3enda o December 16, 1987 PAGE - 10 32. Approval of the Professional Services Agreement (CO 87- 132 224) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and DeLeuw. Cather and Company. Engineers and Planners for the preparation of Preliminary Engineering Studies for various proposed railroad crossing improvements throughout the City and the associated preparation of Public Utilities Comodssion Applications for Railroad Crossing Improvement Funding unaer the Federal Highway Safety Act, Section 203 Funds and for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications and engineer's cost estimate for --id crossings as outlined on the attached Exhibit "i' cope of Services. The Trot -to- exceed fee of $IG:. .0.03 will be funded by Systems Development. 134 33. Approval of the Professional Services Agreement (CO 87- 225) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Engineer for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications and engineer's estimate on the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain from Monte Vista Street to the Cucamonga Creek south of Base Line Road. The not -to- exceed fee of $24,800.00 will be funded from Drainage Fees. 34. Approval to award and execute Professional Service 135 Agreement (CO 87 -226) for the inventory and condition analysis of the City's drainage facilities to Don Greek and Associates, for the amount of $78,000 to be funded from Drainage Funds. 35. Approval to advertise the 'Notice Inviting Bids' for 136 the Etiwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter Improvement Protect located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue from Victoria Avenue to 263 feet north of Victoria Avenue, and on the west side of Etiwa-ia Avenue from 30 feet south of the Southern Pacific ha.lroad Crossing to 280 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing. RESOLUTION NO. 87-681 137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'ETIPANDA AVENUE COBBLF CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE I', IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS w. titr " City Council Agenda December 16, 198 PADS 36. Set public hearing for January 20, 1987 - Approval of 142 intent to vacate a portion of the non - vehicular access rights, av dedicated on Parcel Nap 6725, located on the south sidi of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 87482 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARbtNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITQ INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON - VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES D. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have .au ;ublic hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will ba acted upon by the Council at on-2, time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. None submitted. E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by law. The chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN A46 AM ENOMEN 8 -03 - CITY OF RAFICHU CUC {ON^u�! A - A proposal to amen 'he Victoria Commun ty Ian Text to require a Conditional Use permit for certain community facilities as specified In the Commercial Standards and Community Facility sections of tha Victoria Community Plan. PAGE a k' City Council Agenda December 16, 1487 12 , ORDINANCE NO. 332 (first reading) 156 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 87 -03, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TC REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND COMMUNITY FACILITY SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN 2. ORDER TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON VEHICULAR ACCESS 156 RIGHTS ON H ENUE BETWEEN f 0 ILL BOULEVARD AND AIEH ARROW ROUTE. RESOLUTION NO. 87.683 167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87- 169 0 B - WEIR CK PROPER lE - A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Office to Nnighborhood Commercial for 3.56 acres of land located an the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 151 -33. RESOLUTION HO. 87 -574 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AMENDMENT NO. 87 -048 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SCUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 202- 151-33 PAGE ,a byYa� City Council Agenda _ December 16, 1987 13 a a 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 169 MENDMEII 8 -03 - WEIRICK FROP T1 E5 - request to amend the Development District map from 'OP" (Offico /Professional) to 'NC' (Neighborhood Commercial) }_ for 3.58 acres of land located on the southwest corner � of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 151 -33. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -575 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. DENYING r' DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -03, REQUESTING A CHANGE TN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOU'HWEST CORNER OF L0141TA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN 202 - 151 -33 4. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 40 FOR TRACT N0. 12873 LOCATED ON 171 H E ID F H YEM EIIUE BETWE N LEMON AnHUL D —BANYAN S P T� P MAIMMIRMLL DIS R C NO. 1. RESU.UTIOM NO. 87 -684 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 40 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOP TRACT 140. 12873 B. ANNEXATION N0. 10 FOR DR 87 -22 CUP 85� -37 P�CI 3 OF 177 PM 9 871 TO L DSC FE MRLNjtflMtL DISTRICT NO. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 87-685 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ONIERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION MO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR D2 87 -22. AND CUP 85 -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 9487) ( PAGE City Council Agenda December 16, 1987 14 ' C. ANNEXATION NO. 23 FOR OR 87 -2E OR 86-42 CUP e5 -37 !b: F�P LL T-07 PM 9, N T NOS. 28 3 32 9 D O 3 TTO STS LIGHTING INTENANCE DCT NO. RESOLUTION NO. V-686 106 i 't A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION V. 33 TO STREET LIGHTIKS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87 -22, OR 86 -42, CUF 85 -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 9487), TRACT NOS. 12873, 13279 AND 13443 0. ANNEXATION NO. 24 FOR TRACT h0. 12873. LOCATED ON 197 THE S 0_ 6F RAVEN CMEEN LEMON ENU 4D BANYA14 STRE f TO STREET LIGHTING M I@T NANC DSRCT NO. Z. RESOLUTION HO, 87;9, 198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNL.. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110. 24 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 12873 E. ANNEXATION NO. 6 FOR TRACT NOS. :3279 AND 13443 204 rYICTORI TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DTRICT NO. 3. RC:, LUTION MO. 87 -688 205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TI4E WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT. NOS. 13279 AND 13443 F. ANNEXATION NO. 6 FOR DR 87 -22 OR 86-42 CUP 65 -31 212 PC 3 0 948 O S R:EETT L>G I G N INTENANCl: DISTRICT NO, 6. V Q ry iy City Council Agenda December 16, 1987 PAGE _ 15 RESOLUTION NO. 87-689 213_= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTICN WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING 11:E FtNAL F ..nkER'S REPORT FOR DR 87 -22, OR 86 -42, CUP , -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 9487) F. PUO C HEARINGS The following items have r• :..cation or posting requirements. The Chair wi. i meeting to receive public testimony. 1. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO N�JJIRE FU9LIC RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR 221 TII BASE LI IIE R Hl WADE'. 1m; Ph 'YjL_ D TM EkN ARC BALD AVENUE ANU HELLH YtNUk - at ina property locoed at 9549 Roberds Court APN 202- 161 -09) for the construction of street improvements across the Base Line Road frontage of said property. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -690 222 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERATION OF OBJECTIONS OA PROTESTS RAISED IN 225 EMINENT DOMAIN TION -- Or er to Construct was poste December 1. 19til at 9549 Raberas Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga In accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 19)1 for the Bese Line Road Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue. ti ,r 3 l� C A t +t i r M iI PAGE City Council Agenda eP�mAysrg+ December 16, 1987 16 231 RESOLUTION NO. 87-691 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 9549 ROBERDS COURT (APN 202- 161 -09) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUCH 5880, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 F.. CITY MAAAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony. although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. MOBILE HOME RENT STABILIZATION - Consideration of an 234 agreement, the Rancho Cucamonga Mobile Home Park Accord, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all mobile home park owners pertaining to rent stabilization in mobile h ,.me parks. 2. REPORT ON PARKING LANE MAINTENANCE ALONG THE NORTH SIDE 235 OF FOOTHILL BOULE RO BETW �RCHIB LD VENUE AND RAMUNA AVENUE@ ARLHIBALD AVENUE TO K U AN YEN-E, AND KLUSMAH AVENUE TO HELLMAN H. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. Consideration of appointing a subcommittee to interview and make recommendations on appointments to the Historic Preservation Commission. 2. Consideration of reinstating Marketing Public Relations Subcommittee. M iI Q,' '441 .` City Council Agenda December 16, 1987 PAGE' . ; _ 17' ? li I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEAT MEETTNO This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the utter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. K. ADJOURMNENT I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 11, 1987, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. ,_ • .i y.�d.•x yr�t.:�ia V � '6i.. ' Y�� .� +Sr J•'e.��� � '? a � 1�� VY�NYPPON Pee Yr N d0° P�pPWd0 MP 4'• O'•O NddOPdP 1 fOYlQO.I�NypONWrOY00ydp1°i+lYix ,ty' 9 l..p lOY p+PiIW NdOf.OY NO 1_j �... 0000>On/�^ +x+i>wrsm..yOC9C S ^S ^i >AnOOeiiwYr » »»^ »^» T+OiI yy I. .mi ^TN�Ywn�r�^iy�=y } ^waOTL mi r. apDDT ^rn a(nn> >�. 1� 'il r >Nr00 4=Srn TIY+O co r+ -F£P: >O �mAOrTm j.. y f. eT. a> ^ YYrmwr mn.".e.^.�^"Rnwno �z�-.e +°• :R � 1°. �in zan m.>•n'+ >iszi�> Pm nim�x.s =m Q� 9i>Om�inlrxim� ^ ° }Tw IN' j nw >Irw O j9 Ym 1 >OOo Y Y�yTY0�mr1rT0 N SO V >y .L y� 1 Dn,TT ^.'Zn AD'+DQTO _y CRONwN�a COTyV � TO My }n= r Y yFC9� ~D >T^aN ' 1 � O >T_ tiVw YOpTT ati O !T (� Tr 1r P +$ T y2 mA 0yY y �n P t NN n i cs mr 1 1 �r/ y yy °ANYYON�rjOO n]]ff + !m i` \OfDM+xnmWmOWn�x xO+TT //xx} Y 0 uii uYj r.OiW =z + o Y>mYa: >ammC >Tw)mw im + ormra min�ziimin�in$m'x OeeNa.+a aT w >:.c o�na Ty.- m�TimMm.N> >PI°zoN _ 1A•.Om.... y' mNmmwOO//P��w�Na NwOOO TTNmV VCn�Ayln } 402 � > Vm IT Naca ga_ o iA an °c °Y °'- w- rz asm= \Nam. N y � N iz : ys GP Li.°. n nv. ozr rNrmzmw � nr 1 a +T >N.I nrYV2mNT >�00 �n0< 6r =Md- >ar nw OT y x CC 1 q „VP N >ZOim wgT.OY >w0 ^O.aiNPaiN>rr2e T ' na COVyO> �T O 1 Om= ml.^ir ^mti mmy�OCi -420 no> AC Na TAn oi+°NMV-- • nn ^ nraF "' °u nnnnn nnnnnn+� °e ooE a + __ o+ � oY z 000co 0000 �e + 1 UAAX =A==AAg aa\ Lm'_ aSy D .N.. aYDa m rn 9 riOw w 'D = DAAaaD P yVP 1 Y wrrww rr wrVr 1 Y Y TT'r+ti ry + n rwa j1 a •Y. H=°aN a wNwM.�i aaT. ° r+jn.Yxx r .s+oj. � i uauuraaaa`aa °oee.rueecaaaaoYa ueaeaacaoaa+rr daNUaaaaaaadaappa apa �oaaauuemsmmmpmmpeue IA s' YPM�YNrOaOyP VJ.WNrOSOMmVJVN�OdOyPplVNxd..O d•1 IA i� r�M•N°�PNO rorP �Yw - ��prOrr r�pw r M +D T pymWYpW °pp udpOpWrarNN °Wyf i'NN idOVNNaOPWy yra JVOOVNVVpraNfpMVYlplp.Or yf Y �YVVOOrOVyrONl YI.Y OOVrVVWNpppOVOU00rUrN 1jy VP +V YVYyNOVOVO }IPUVOVYOJVONVWVOONdVOPVVO YV L M;. as wPhP�NPP PYPUPPr a P P a d y m y PyPPd00 rOPPP It• P SrPUPNlJf•IYfrJ�VNlaPdPblNfrYO J•'Y PYY<YyYMn j.j N •IP NPOPIPdYpNmI PP as °go:il.vsss�s�R » FrTwrww » »NZVxz�zsvoNO i„a. a �s.°..�o olSl ril�NA �INn nai }'� >iOwyia >ansml° -n ��° naT° � T •°� r L,xi .r NOL srn ra0n 0000 } n01"yS a21•' 1 an• O >M•10 In2 1" is v/S� al}iln yanw z4HT "a m�A.rii 9»on�n }•e°I ZT_zTIsT ^T'n i ° ONmPTa O }u }yT }}� }_O _S<aDO0ar1 ^AUST r G F>un Vr °'I" M� TN FTti `> �yOD G (ITDxT TCT 1^ilr .zrw a °O n rri�In"ian � i �{ Tw•1 < I•iJ JODT � u >000 ; N s zi y a> 1 a o v RavCr iiw <°."iirn=r �l v$.°Ibb °�.s.. >o>TaiTNV ac. r-i'n vv °i,°n i Ty>IbF N.(.{TSN >�» »x0> TOT 4ySOACI`. .Y ^»VTn w 4w <rYT�rPRns »a..s na<TOa vzMT npez z. ^ A00 2> nT0 •IN>NTT >� r 9y0000 >nO Nn 2 F xONm9T Oe any 00'1 Nln >9FTNbTTD +� y�T m,.r'mn� aN J^tV �DT r• »OOCT w 1� yC <CtT °Y °Cr ^r T bx ^TOni9TTn NNTKy �p D•�C S'1n <S90D>Daa. °nTn ^S�SwTObx��. ror• y » °<�'N O° a _ i p T0n ^Y y90 � c »Tw T wv vi�•Ti ii .°rn' SS'Ir m ,:i sTN es c° � sa °C ^vnTPe PN • ^DU °i .>- i '^ a »a Tf zaT vc�a a bn z ^.m1 T v ^z.T•n n �In In y Naon eY c v v v v ry NN ; 6T4° ,xw KP<m wxiU n �~ T JT .O,N N 1 9A> y uu< a YA 1•P Q9�wD A dD T ; u�w r •1 .0 9 y •� y y r 1 > M^ T N n a r N .s.N nU� H N JN r» i z v rrrrrrrr : n adaeaaaraaaoasaruaa�aoaaroaala auaunroaa erP $,oa 1* r Oa0•IP NJyNU0a 0•IP UJyNr4aPVPNJVNrOaO Ib Z n 1 > Ur D r NyYJ rN .O Y Z. aNrYNJ40rVrPP OJ Jr�NVbUJNYrUJdOry •N•YaJ l± R 44UV4ppVV°400aa0000VOJPVpP aUbUNN ..IN0y0PYNM ; 4VV 4 VVUJVVOVrUPOJONV Vry.OVJbJraVV4JYVNUUVPO N O4VV000VVOYV ROOOPOOOVVNPaPParVYrUY4lNy0lV Ir O� f. �i't :q .. • ..vJ, ww.2 `Je]4n+.• -Ld,.- :i •° -� - .._, - - r� •IJ OMOiIOVIPYPPOVYVYPMN dl,YrdPNY PNOPOPdNN +1 �' }} S�( P yrVVlOiPwNPNVOUPVUPOVVPVppPYr NPPUOPNMONV V10NVYVYOOYPVPfVPPbPNiONNMPNO • -�•' I; 1 ; ff IPVOPJNYriM -i 4 • ��Y♦ll T Z YCCCCC�JYN• NWN NNAy�Yaggq�qqqPq 1 K 11 '1' j =• A = n z p ~I•YICZT %O F y� =DY�ry �n am m x ' �InTT•Ni if =S<Y 2LgRTN °SN=mOyNTTT ' JT m mmNplF m2MN 20TDD [� (yl a0•'/N C•Iy Mmlmn.2n� KN� OSONm °2KTgwm O Z =n[lK��011 / w Sa •Y.•T Ono "OC=° � •� O I •� }�Z�nO�r�NwnM�00nYyn1^il OM>f, °(1j DNw n(lm2 1•YAKm yz °mm•v1> . Gm�:[DK �• amCLrq ON` Z 1ni2 • AJCM�TOwC O�nmOY °OiY� >A(lO i T I• a•°i y >w NP fIO wiDm�y npw �l _Tn A >YAT ST M�/I CaCTO ^T NfI ^yO fYl Cn yw n J�mSm HO YO T I j n°O[)q S<°a0• Sn•2,1 �lYn I f Ya N • a9z < a> e iiir °q a'• ar. YZ i ur. /•ao q/•N on as s8 /z.• c no � S mY A I J NN .2. � O l rND°w°i °a°PgO°Ng2N yyTZTTNa °TTaTT` >MpC�T<TN< � O�gOO1�gNOqYC /�y`�YVn� I '� C' nNgSO W{� �l Kn qO OggYgOaOqmt n {� p S yT„a °f2J0y COm`mLt TI.OIPtY YpY Y): •AiK COanYN of 1 NVY9S�•°r•m ff N T SNmP°••m ff YyYNNV (1JAwT.I.•1gNy.>tp /w 1i y C mNm JMZ�•YK1�r Cw NNrNJ .2 OJMA>TOV T ASm >Y SN ^ �(V j+n }On2g2Y Pf �°.a °j /tirgYn=mq °aJm =am.•aON2 �S�wwa ^� ^Nrr �2 m2J I � m TONNy gmggNwyOm p CZyVP TmraJKVA�yTjnmA cc C CN \NgY NO. �9NNM92rJ IT ONCaYJTi CCw M (m Rm•nm m`�SN• LOC=Yl'.•wi°2 (l In n• n2Jy^ O! Oq �Oy LO200> °=JJO/°Irccn..r la Y 9A16MyN /�i.°.� yu��l•N• N JiN qir YmzE i `d r�n�lw •uw $aN mw7%m a�Jr °/•IN -9 x°.r allo rsaoNjls /aMy ie JCV v/ia.=.i imY nn�N °y. .. °mb i JnnJOnJ ai:onnNCn 99 nJ Jy nn °n�:. nl- i •< z9 g� i�e�� ./. �°. °s °.s oaf.•.\. ^• o-- °.-°.w °a.°..a/ °.�.. -m P2MT L aD2m<xp • .f. µ .a..z.•.Y cm•ef.YT po in d.2. fi a n b°aJaa ua .a.�9., i t' �r K Zom W.•r• Y sm a .• /+ r r 9J r� i mg ri q 9ZI•Nw M N Z MN N =•mi• Ns NNNNNNNNYr••V Vrrrrrrrrrrryr •.rVyVMru.l. y.rrrV Oy00yp O0000QiidOOidM1li idiOddnld Ydi3O •i iidiiYid 0O0 IT OO p diiO iiidYYiiiVydNdialdddpOdi <Oid VOOUOOROUiVi,O Kidd J.pOpObp00006JVYVVVYVJVP dPVP Pf VyrOdPJP iVNrUdpJPNMUNrOdOYP IA PJ.WNJOd •� Z O r N N 6 upi O J u • i q N r •+r ••Pr V••p V Nr p yjlPJ ; i T OVTg -MO VNy O••N Nr••V OJOr .. bN VYVMW IVVMC 71NdOVr.•U JYOVNVON Pf J�/•IOVNp Mf 1 m •T iiVJyUbrVOPUWNMVVVPN nWOVUON000 0V ✓Y••V OUrPOPNOI. U UVUI,V JYVi VOY VV OOOOVONOWOOVYVVVS♦ II Y OUOO VfdOVVVfOPOOVpN /~ I�. ■ 1 M d 1 TTS= 5s�^«m }N *T ~ M> 1� iNaa �a 1 ► OTNN I ma .s SN < 1 TC (I 1 i °am I T a 1 c 1 zm la 1 D (S� Oti P m N NNNNN pN I• 800400 1a aiW w.'.o I a i I� n i > V II O o QQvu NW i.a m f OrNPYN IN f e S$.aoafo L4 .Wr NNX m PJ >wS I ssI'i�ro I OrNT TTA�n• I T v • ONY � I <°Lv nz•� i QQ a iN i >z ;;x o m N TTS= 5s�^«m }N *T ~ M> 1� iNaa �a 1 ► OTNN I ma .s SN < 1 TC (I 1 i °am I T a 1 c 1 zm la 1 D (S� Oti P m N NNNNN pN I• 800400 1a aiW w.'.o I a i I� n i > V II O o QQvu NW i.a m f OrNPYN IN f e S$.aoafo L4 ■ 4 x: I .I ;r 1 .11 � ' w .: YJP fix: i.m.•,jlwt!. +.. 4• n . .�.yl., .. P PS,Ii d PqOii P ✓ r lNruyVWVrPNO +uYIT ✓N O SOOOAAOOMN> >Y >T» �g>mms »Y air. -nn oerTNNTTNNZr�rDrm..n rz�.y�ra »err ✓�e>m >svrma nnrr r�. z nzoo z >z`SZnsli y nc pm »� 2rmTmmOrrgsg >1xSC TG. }Oa •.r •Ir r�Pe. °z zo- s�°n•... Tob ^i�cccimm � +N ^TZ� qr >c «<zr q iyT }qi f=1 n n NY a ✓nO=Or q n p� SL» >TTT O �mmlan In G N 9 A G2r2iDa SC �C >�On9DArn}irK nYO"I S`v.°..N »IrDm »mvr.'a Wlli 9rm >m9N >rT 1T0 m rS it�p2 Lrmo(>jT na °i 2 lTxSTDeI<w Si'O� O I�r� mi' >mnSDOrNN S' T qT G O LN`Mm y O m o "n »olcl.n s m n Nm +nnnDOr n i G iooygo�T` c i i Ni�zTZ„ NJ m n +aaaai o D n T �rr✓.� z �• -�Et• T-2' YVrOOrPlrWWP r•W 1 Nr�MJV.aPLe N•f•P• U `S t.. -1 �I >rra Twizamrr i'. •� I°.I' i � Y bra 1 <ray >.pzll.<.m> IYP z v i S•TiN� STw.y wAr O a zz irmi.� a � i S ^ 1 C • 1 S N 1 » m n n 1 o n£n n n n rn +.n m2�Nnx x T x A nTwai .Oi. wTir2 Tlrw m'~ T m r >aODOZ �OZT000 O O O wQmQCy>C ml.rr w r _ m ♦tnz\ \\ \ 1 c i +i �• a ,zn b SNw N S �M a to aa: r ✓n✓ »r. �i�cni�oNe n z 1 INI <o�ayy�y- r- J- ✓P- yadyaacyoae ✓uaoneaoaaaoo(Ira . i io luV�NVgNPMNgVgV♦ 1111 rJJ +WrWIri.Y 1N..W YWYOOW ° OibJPVIVNrONOwIP VIV ♦ ♦ ♦i ♦ ♦:V! ♦NrO:V:NO 'N° N NWO Ni • rNrlN •.y yrVp 1 yOUJMryVNINr. C.pJMN uNOpOPJVVPNJ M V .pr J..O VN�ONOVWPrVOV ✓OP PWVrpyINlVPN y N NUNVVr�y�VWVUOJONyJV UOVOPONVJVPO O U N 2 O . a r i a y z c w � A 2 i i 1 9 D m > r d d' Y: JY. it -`. 424 rPYPOOPOPw WNV +OAP mrPPN PDpOpPJ PPOP,dd OdWNpMPbNONNNNNmuYWO +rbambbNDrrJePJNWrrV YVJP} PMNI YOOYVWmOeJyJP INJNNWNdPVrNIOAwbJO' S gOUO+OOTTmmmTmmm�OT0000Un n0 n nanny n n� ommp A»Y� NMN amm>.)..>. F T8n8000rmr>ii zT TSTy >All O Nn(lr +r� rri alts yTis Yrra nASa om�yr^no�syns�"oy i <is�� g�c�yn�Tinm nir>- 1>-i >r z n�iiinw N.°. >'^ a °ii <.r•. �.=. n.�.z. i.A^a °P °nail °y ��+ o. n $ram tinnmTy�an zyzzy� Yl�m °R• Symmm - SVJp1 tom^ °uY »n »s=ea i2iizl> 1'Tn�> .ii. it °moseii r�rc °sz airy�ooiaro8oz. r.°..NnyN "a °>D y;A Yra y Lrni. oai zn .S. RiN% r �>�•e yg r »nao .nmmn cmvi� no m YTT s m o{�mTm o ^r'TTL � Ni aPPN .w. �: ^gi'.iTNM Y ^• °b° �0v� �c s .°.tea ° of .s..°�q r N r> Zy qN V � TNmlNnr1mOlr {ggT9CNmpC>w( - N- OTT.1Jan(�D >nm >O c.•.nm2mr..n>NZUm >2 S<L ^a»L� OOmZOm ;e_ +NC Nm'ppIOP N..°fIOOMS +iYwS9 Tm )FAQ >m�.2i02•Sn >nnC �• rP> •rj »O.Si.�a ^n[i• A.m nNnmOONTOrrrb>NrPrTTiYnr r.l 2Ni F Tr> rr aF.[ CS•.r >ry0 a OrmLgm Sllgmp� Fw.lTi +»_nNmm.f 2Mn)m< >nmNJ ynrA >n OmTT�> >Oyn T TT YOrmT y+ .2•T 1°'�Angm�p2 M• °°iw A.•aA a1.°i.N m.>iJA �T•r a2lif lMCAm2 .T rwyN ryrOONrnLr4e00inr�A O(1 YOSTmOlYMgO nr• N y r {w >aP. rrmumTCJ TY�T � 02J0 2 °1 \n nm «r �aF rvAM \Np 02120y 2 �t ±AUp _ P CmiYa)2 C/110r r.( {P gNi »° °{n>S M °ar�m>r mMy. O.° >MOgaN ».V.1 Y w O yn \yq)> n)pnm Ngngm ^m ° O_<J yiJPyTnVFrN +rN YmnrV An ^2ri m N1 N SPY ! .nnPFF >mN2rFrm> °.r.. N •'° )OdwO ° >°°n ;°rOngn(00°° mi2�n00000w> Tem =10rT SyTS N mmriniii. .Si.uOUTaS n.in >ZTN A VO +a P i'C raNO a<aDNAe AAAbaly ZI Jr wnCMGrwVm n ° •r P r r rr +u »i + P mrrJrir0 NwM mN N M N.Sn NwNiM Yw�N.2^ �NN� N� P N ar.e is a•riea <r+a� r.eraacoosaocaao+ -e ealo a.riro asi.a eosa n J +yJ + +r +rryJryyrNJ rr- ...-.J JJr «y..Jr.....y b o�° oti °oo +aa +a +aeaebembePeeePryYy +J PwPPp - o+ ebDp :WUroaPyPPStlNroamJpPll:NroamJDN W�var ". d. �.P^.d.« eP pNa u.°- °.�auo °w�ia000e�.vMe�a.Nieo lP gal .duo �-e �n OPylWN V�.uuN�o�:vo•u•u o:+p�o:+ +uoe�.. �.00 OVNPYOVOrUYVPPUruVVPrV lmNOVVVOOVOVNYVVYOV - n. .... . 1... "•.' kr(ti+ c`iaiy'Z` .. - t "s - "r` - ":..- •�HV r`>. a i� o�wy��ousmm oaamarN Ormruaaoaarrrrwrr ao p PI OmmJJyyyP «yJmIYOJJOrrPpPPrNP•-!• 1T� PPa° «yMraYNyaOP y••ymYNdNPdmPOMPNrPJ••r Ymw mP• y 0002]ii yz2 +m Vi+ 392arrrTrom -r r J Jr Jan N 22zz) ° vrrz) sLt ) >T ) v :z Vie•^ 1:+�na mow. as }bNri vnnn ^nzvnac.+ •eN �}vo9saa r fit. vsmrvv�i s'4� r1 z za yom $r��A }�w� %ONwrO n2T ic•- rT} syYOONa- LOrfrTNaV+v �nmsvN r_ }pmp) Am'x zzno e.i r z J '•A OZGiO� ON AA C'400 </�M19+OZ• {°O)r TNmn pTramme Or ^a qq y NiOD ° ^Dy <t�rPTn ^M°O rnTa} O 03�2< 0a9 �-°• mN T m p nOrA ^Tw nrNNC m Jr r [. n• -•AO `y ST Tn9N 2' m y0 `ymm ZS F }aD 9Y D L S=Nm 20(+ Sm t ' NOYS Ab °OHN 'o+^nv T <2 ^i< 4iT J. -r.-°• SDn 518 --G AA .a z- nNr w n v• rrz {y S ^m -z• L.N. Tz r 1a+• Ts ao � z z �^r-.r N TNN«arr STN rra 9JrJ -+Te ✓' vm1°nz�c.(.3. nnrmxN� c�nC %Crm m.w �}amT)•iir )9NOZnNrwN 900T =< nCJmmeDTnNwaY ZTaJnnga m+°nv °rNTni °.°n v,N O Z` 20 eQi ` } }O (j P �� c••n r�mSS2 Z��Annn UmmNa OyrNnJ yO =J•N « } }mflnN�iC<r }KM OO nOT�aila Jy y-. ne '�C 9y��NmNe }OOMmTZrLm aCDNMrC°T< D v{�, yn oLNra_ M Op .py .I 11+m mK£<)JA)m ^-• AmNDml CNOaT ° <N9J JmOym �4pmJ ar yvezm •wxi <zacaaa- .FNVaJa�anl�r oaN� v ^oe w -i• ' ri °o nm rrT arrnnrSN)lircrN ow°.JaB H� �� • 9aT rL aor v`�r o «nnmv{�tJ wyy9 y a .N.az .T. -z.m Irr laws e ^anN=TZ -.m lw J(�TVy9 N� 21i • e) Maw } - �m r Jw J�'^ ne >IwI++N + �ia °sor aNi ru •ai s , >Tw f 7zOzz N - °i ° «m.. °rN••. CO'a u � T•Z•ewma 9= a:, J •rilira Z y9rna vz -n+ zx LNrz Nna nnn nnJ -srl me ylnes »N oNY s On y L S+z Og.y N - °m a °iZ.• n °.s.+z zSzJ n z O°TZ m J arm DT nA GJCrY rJ nM Vr o m i�maJ mN sw abJ n n yO auw^^ Si LT ry a�y0 s Ni[Tm y n NwH ax eN iW rm+an �. ua. .anN a�e uaoa- .---- Paea.Iroaaoseaeoa<a.e eaaaa <`a :saoe< ao mmmmPmemPmnmewommemeesosommoowoemeo °o uo +- ui�w^ lWWWWWYWyWWNNNNNNNNNNrrrrrrrrrr P PooJpNJYNroamJPPJWNroamyPO lyvream JP Vr PP m SOP OJ• -NrPMU VVJOVV......I.. .... lyPNYrrwONWPYJrONWJVV< uVyVVUOVWOV000 J.-aamOVVURNVOUPJMeJMY }RaVJ VV JVOlOVP°VVOONYNUaOVUVOYJO°mNUNI M••PruOW f,> iT i i 11 1 e i L i i i i IT I IA °r U y i n a x a 1 T E a n T s �a n m T a 'a W*_- " 4t A { YOOON�IN J•P DyPPJpPPPVMVUVNrOdPNP p `I,J ' �•Q . >plNj NrpN °✓`. OPP4VyOPN4WNUrN�ru� .ONVrOVNUV.IO rPOS r WyOYymumOVd�NJNJ �' -•i9 �� rz_� f{P.IyywODNOPDVJOUdVgYYr°N 1> - �r. T ^N1 LnLN<OGCnyNNNN NInN ^� }Aa �}Daaaae��p T N` iT..� r�? aar>Nr %a4N Lryr 'ode: zn<rsK�a! >irSNi'PcT3°..�ox >m o".ro m.°ImrziTma � <rrr TN. i rn Tz� mr2 oo °o��NY::Nmm: w ��za z. �L y roirTmm�°.rNn t.n > c 1 _ NTZn CPA Sro. ar1%yli ;Iron °OSOwa.N..z2zz rsnn >wTllo« ari.: uzTm mn rrmnnn nia'^m"i4""cc�z> zrmm� o Lnnmz Petra >r. Vr2 zo ^r >OO' °!rl n= ° � ',� P n..%NS YP ^p >pim. S��'• O�.xr m.�Pr ><r ' ^ r n nr mppSnS^ter N>CnTm�rOT2 °y'wn f � '�• O Mr.ti j. �+ = SfOatO (n� Oa9anD�9SG2PA��.~'iOP >S rrSO aT.mrni > >yn> r�yr �lm1 Ay>T ON nO a � >w �Nnrn Or�mN n Nr2j r °wN 9 09 I.Y r°i r y� tir'i r N 1 yVO, HOO wn� ^ 1 » � °n >MViZNO >.r An >..ONUWp Npm°OpNON >n2xNaONpr lOrm_S•'Im TnTlw !Tw<aJJNTyrrpmT T. Z > »Nf >ya2 1 1 y2ya T Panym�2armm -'.Piet i Lrm.Nil �nJ> .pr rMnr T^ m r O rmyT'�i mT >an0 SnMr YM�mxN D �+ � >OO�PTTm . 1 I .\\ ^IT ^O %2 ^O .... -9-1p �S >I+Iy YCrr m.. BPIn� }L oon �cDrin<oymr •__N rrn:r cJ�m TDN Mxv Ox mSLYPOOrm >xN2 w e♦ AFL 1 rrOrm x2 n... N)T T ��r 1 I� r�rCmT MNST^T rl�Nl TCTTIym >2 <TS>N r OT��O 1 1<_'Tn <rrpOpC r�TrN r 1 •D�y NAPN Oi, %TmAm> nraJ:trn it r° aN TJn ' - y2w.r N nmmn N I iN i n m nnnn ^iT�$nnnnmm�nn >Oion a nI 2 o Ngo yyoy° n� .v'eoec >coun�AnV °n -°I NN .oy ryx wrrr SxixxNx T no<r r xz:ozxxs zyy n mnJ i � V Jr>Nmi.,mm,.mmi:V zr r a g PDTpNP SnPaaDDp} nSV a.n (+ 1 I '! r w _n \y�ri .y r rwr .y 4TT Mwrw w > S r M idx.. N.xi•.2+ n � N !r'"�` TMNH M «w.i. Ne.r.. .". > n ° iddOdddWdOYddddddNdpdd�Vdd�V dddidd(Ii n C ddd Y.pd 1T � YMI UNmPry' nV.'V.'�'�'VPVpPPNppppVUmi�um.M NMNYMJJm. Im. ^ OI PVpV '9 O JUNrOdOyppluNrOdmVpVJWNrOdmy i > V ^ uV�PdNVVNVVwV rVJJU�PdN dPVJmVOdOJrPVPV '" WJyJ is "� YdVO..V VPrUOyVUVVOII.um ✓JVNU°d ^yVYyN° J V4MUUNOpUyrVVOVduVyUmOPVNyJr Jy��PdO p mgNVNdONOOdONOUpPV IPgVIUNJdNONVVUV VVO 1 W*_- " 4t A { AP LKAIM M MR ALCWK C KVWAW LK1MM T., C.a.1 1R1 Yar1...� .. Iw..M.O`Mlt { W Y[te[dlpp • nwn.w —w..r- �6iNT�.M�1ar 1. [:/M) ( UC NWj) IAt No. ON SMi Or1RAAL SATM 01.4" Priority 613 . 1937 Coodltl0al APPOW A. lr.3awa lturw0..w Itil. atmr Ma O0M Cs v�J.l 1 KU" ar AIMAAN10p ZW[w.w tP.e+0... LAU. Michael S.L. LAU. Philip A.P. a TYMM of IWtlACIgN(!) M UG ITIO now (6000.00 47 Annual row 679.00 C7 20 Apply eK l Mww.v f.W. l t It Ww.._ bn .d Sn 7690 Wvw. Avw., 0elt 613 i If e CPT WA on CJ. C ~[ TOT4 S 67 0 Aw TWaIUrr 41- 20ss01 to Cenral upon /ssuanrw Coy u.M/ yen IL MWkq Adb Of Aewr ins S)-te.a.. w/ Awl m...r... A.. et f. 1l..rp rn.Wr.vAo-1 N.1.W I la Mw lw wN.4..6 q.IMPiw4r #"Ak.Mk A M ZZ ca a A. r nedL N ar 0.PrY... w- 11. Y/}Y. -TU- M.1 w.. r r .i w w rIMVW .Ye..Rrl M ewr Pll N IW Alyasea 17 AIYar..pM (N r...q rqr .SAn.4h r.A. a.w.r Py� rl L.w .[ 4 .wY .Mr N . auww, M AIMMAr. w. rrewMre +rrrM.l..atiNM.wwrYMra.i.4 a...w. C..N An. 11 LTATt CM CAWOgnA C. W Man trrn..dim 0.a LL/lo/A) `= .n.i /r.M1J .�I.wr...�.Y aYrM✓•. Y..N...YYa ... .. Y.. \Yp. 14 APVUC M SAN MPt �yT- -C •�O _ C� � 1 APPLICATICM BY 7tANSMO! 11 SIATI M CAUTOtaA C.r.v N 0.n_ w. w..... w. O. IM1 .I....Ati..YV.w..r..r...1..�N.. .. ...Y W.�. b.u....M.w .. w✓r... M1 �M1 a r wM..Y.4 Y tia� I � De NN WrIM 41a. 7K LW17w 1:[Pr.1.ee1 U.All Aawf.A O ar.I."rd..6y.e.�ea O M" p 11 /]0 /d7 eer Ca 5 a1A1m ❑bwaLlr N- wY ...... OMr WT 11. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT' DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst M Typically, these field order changes are relatively minor but could include several sub contractors and, consequently, more than one individual working on the same task. In cases such as this, it Is not uncommon for the resident inspector to notify the City of a problem and the cost associated with its correction. Once the City approves of the change then the resident inspector can authorize the contractor to correct the problem in the field. The ability for the resident inspector to correct minor construction problems is important to keeping the work in progress. �Q -: -, SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND RESIDENT INSPECTOR CONTRACT TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF FIELD ORDER CNi,NGE AND TO MODIFY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS i RECOMMENDATION: Amend Professional Services Agreement CO 87 -133 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Tem De Minico as it relates to field change order approvals and automobile /liability insurance. _ BACKGROUND: On July 1, 1987 the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement between the City and Tom De Minico, resident inspector for the Civic Center ani Public r Safety facility project. EVALUATION: At the time the Professional Services Agreement was executed, the contracr indicated that the resident inspector, in conjunction with City approval, could approve a field order change provided the cost did not exceed $100.00. An example of a :field order change can include such things as relocation of electrical, mechanical and plumbing equipment which may onflict with locations of walls, door or window openings. M Typically, these field order changes are relatively minor but could include several sub contractors and, consequently, more than one individual working on the same task. In cases such as this, it Is not uncommon for the resident inspector to notify the City of a problem and the cost associated with its correction. Once the City approves of the change then the resident inspector can authorize the contractor to correct the problem in the field. The ability for the resident inspector to correct minor construction problems is important to keeping the work in progress. �Q -: -, Eecause a number of different construction disciplines aria ,e manpower are involved, staff finds it important to,increa C. the amount of the fieI6 order change amount from $100.00 to • $500.00. This modification to the contract will not eliminate the need for the resident to inform the City- of the problem and receive approval before authorizing the field order change. In addition, In evaluating the insurance requirements for • the resident inspector it Is reccmmetded that the automobile and liability Insurance requirements be changed- from $1,000,000 to $50C,000. Thia adjustment to the Professional Services Ayroement, Seccion 8, will make the Insurance requirements commensurate with other Professional Agreements of similar .cork and responsibility. The City, Attorney hai reviewed the insurance modification and has indicated that the $500,000 for automobile and liability claims is appropriate. Relgpectful&yAubmitted, .Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director , CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Cou:tcil PROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER AND PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PROJECT TO BE CONSISTENT• WITH PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT LANGUAGE RECOMMENDATION. Amend the construction Agreement for the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center and Public Safety facility project to include language identifying procedures for approving change order requests and payments. BACKGROUND: On September 16, 1987 the City Council awarded the bid for the Rancho Cucamonga Civic center and Public Safety facility project to Berry Construction. At the time the contract was awarded the City Council also established a 101 contingency fund for the project. ANALYSIS: Although a contingency fund for the project was prepared, the contract for the project does not contain a provision for change orders to be approved. In order to correct this, it is proposed that language, which is similar to that found in the public works contracts, be added to the construction contract. The language could read as follows: 13 The Community Development Director shall review and approve individual change orders up to 21 of the original contract amount and consecutive change orders whose accumulative amounts do not exceed 101 of the original cortract. Thereafter, City Council approval must be sought and obtained before approval can be cranted ka. 4 1,. 't. 4Y4 ke��t;% .i_e`r • rA5 This language addition will allow ,City staff to revieir a change order request, beg".rtiate the,. amount of the changr`� order cost and to authorize the,paymenl,`so that, the prolec„ 4" „} will not be delayed. The language also requires that amount of the change- order Ss greater, than 2% of the original contract amount; or if the accumulation of change, orders exceed the established 10% contingency Pund,_' then':' the City Council must review cad approve the change order', i3 and payment. r _ Re pectf 1fy submitted, Jack Lam, ASCP Community Development Director i 13 iM r, .i rw �SY ♦ v T Y' :+� 'f 4 C.L.. WAFF REPORT M� 1977 DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizaboth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS RECOMMOMMON: Author<ze the transfer of remaining appropriations from the Special Assessment Districts to the General Fund. BACKGROUND: When the Fiscal Year 1987/88 Budget was developed, the special assessment districts budgeted certsin dollar amounts to repay the general fund based on actual cost to the districts. Additionally, payroll costs were budgeted which reflect an approximate dollar amount of time spent by City staff on the districts. What in effect has occurred is a double charge to the assessment districts. To correct this oversight, effective with the first payroll period in January. all costs previously budgeted in the special assessment districts will revert to the general fund. The special assessment districts will repay the general fund based n actual cost data supplied by the Engineering Department to the Resource Center. To offset costs i:. the general fund, it is also requested that the remaining appropriation balance in the payroll sccounts of the special assessment districts be transferred to the general fund. Respectfully submitted, � — m rt Administrative Services Director JH:cv 14 7. E CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: 71mr Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF AM ALTERMTE 1 WER ON THE CALIFORNIA 1&NIICIisA iMTU0�E7,P(ilORI1T 8W= uF DIRECTORS RFCO►:ff10ATION• L:ty Council adopt the attached Resolution naming Brigit Tate, Risk Management Technician, as alternate representative on the Board of Directors, of the [.alifoinia Municipal Insurance Authority. BACKGROUND: In Maly, 1986, the City became a member of the California Municipal Insurance Authority (CHIA) for general liability coverage. I was appointed as the representative on the CHIA Board of Directors to represent the City. the CHIA ha, lied dlfficuity obtaining a avorum to conduct Beard business as many cities appointed elected officials as the Board member. Since the meetings a•a held In Sacramento during the normal work daffy hours, It is difficult for many City Cwncil etmbers to attend the meetings. As a result, the CHIA has asked each member city to designate an alternate memoer with the authority to act in the stead of the appointed Board member. Since Brigit Tate is the Risk Maragement Technician, and is the individual most closely associated on a day -to -day basis with general liability issues, I ac recommendin3 that she be appointed as the altarnate member to the CHIA Board of Directors witle full authority to act in cy stead at Board meetings. Respectfully submitted, �a4_ Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:cv IS 1- _ �oT RESOLUTION NO. 2 7-(0W A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING AN ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OF THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY California Municipal WsuEce Authority (the 'Authorlty') far tAeipurpotheot obtaining coverage in the Liability Program of the Joint Powers Authority; and - as the City's representative an�tne Authority Board of Directors;; andeslgnated the Board of Directs bee pointed t qacteinathelstead of representative m Hat fd his absence. N)N. THFACFORE, ?E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga; SECTION 1; That this City appofnts Brigft Tat, Risk Management Technician, is-Vi; alternate representative on the Board of Directors, for the Authorft° -. with full poarr to act In the stead of Jim Hart. r/ QJ I to ■: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT � i N DATE: December 16. 1987 TO: Mayor City Council FROM: Laurcn M. Wasserman, City Hanager SUBJECT: Southern Lellfornla Gas Comnanv anchise Fees RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to' sign an agreement on behalf of the City to accept the underpayment of franchise' tees and to release the gas company from any future claims regarding this issue. BACKGROUND: The gas compary has inadvertently paid the City less than our entitlement for gas company franchise fees from the period since the City's incorporation. LMW:lr attachments 1 .R Msx S SIMMONS AGRZEMT AND RELEASE -- J. This Agreemenc and Release (" Release") is ;made and entered into this day of" , 1987, by and between southern Cat fornia oas Campanyy a,C1987, nia corporation ( "SocalOas "), and the city of Rancho Cucaiionga, a municipal corporation of the State of California ( "city "). WHRRRAf,, SOCalOas has recently discovered that it inadvertently underpaid the City $1,731,690.1/ in franchise fees during the period from dovewber 22, 1977 thrasgh December 31, 19651 WHENSAS, SOCalOas desires to pay the City the $1,731,690.18 amount Of underpaid franchise feed WHERM, the City desires to accept the payment of., $1,731,690.18 in full payment of the underpaid franchise fees= and to release soCalOaa from any and all claims with respect thereto in accardence with the terms of this Release. follOwrl NOW, THOMPORR, the parties hereto agree as I. In consideration of the payment to the City of $1,731,690.18, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City, and its successors, assigns, attorneys and agents, and each of them, does hereby release and forever discharge SOCalOas, its successors, assigns and represantatives, including,but not limited to, its directors, Officers, agents and employees, and each Of them, of and from any and all actions, causes of actions, cults, G bts, liabilities, claims, demands, damages, cost$ or expanses at any kind and nature whatsoever, whether now known or unknown, suspected or ELwhich the City may new or hereafter have against asoCalges by reason of any matter, cause, relationship or claim Sag aft of, directly or indirectly, based upon or relating to sOCa10es' underpayment of franchise foes to the City during the period from November 22, 1977 through December 31, 19$S. 2. The City doom hereby warrant, represent and agree that in executing this Release, City does so with full knowleAge Of any and all rights which City may have with ffil i respect to SoCalgas and the matter covered hereby and thati, City. dues not rely =and has not relied upon any representation•, or statement wade by SoCaldas with respect to any of the facts involved in ihe' matter covered hereby or with regard.to City's rights or asserted "rigbts in that connection.- City does hereby assume. the risk of any mistove of tact in connection with the true;facts• involved or in atjruct }on with�say-facts which are now unknown-to city. Trn c. r acknowledges that it is aware 'of•the provisions of Sectiea 1.;. of the civil tole of the State of-California, and does,vxpressly waive and, relinquish all rights and benefits which it has or may have under Section 1542, which reads as followA, "A general release does n, t extend to claims which the cre-Sitar does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by hie:, must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." 3. The city hereby warrants, represents and agrees that in executing this Release it does so with full knowledge of the rights which it may have, and that it has received or has been given the opportunity to Beak and'obtain Independent legal advice from its attorneys with respect to the matter hereinabove not forth and with respect to its rights and asserted rights arising out of said matters. 1. The City hereby warrants and represents that it hav not heretofore assigned or transferred, or purported to assign or transfer, to any Person, -firm, corporation or entity of any kind whatsoever any claim, liability, demand, debt, damage, cost, expense, action, cause of action or other matter herein released. 5. This Release contains all representations and the entire understandlnq between the portion hereto and supersedes any and ell prior written and oral agreements that exist or may have existed between the parties. This Release caaaot be modified except by a written instrument signed by each of the parties hereto. a, In the event any dispute between the parties hereto arisjn7 out of this Release or the matters herein released should result in litigation, the yrevailinyy party shall be entitled to all reasonable costs incurred in connection therewith, including but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees. 19 - 2 - .A a. w.Ti§;a *` - .. ,.° •yry;a;'r Vol', - '- r y,�; i•'.; " "- �'a,.F wv"�:i; '. I._ This Release shall be governed by and i construed in iccordahcs with the laws of the Siata,of California. ' t. .ThLs_Raleaso shall be binding dpon'and inure to the benefit df'ths parties hereto and tbslrersspeotivo x successors and'assigns. r IN'NITM8'WffM f, the prrtics have executed-this' Releaso as of ths.Bats aid—!*ar first above, written._"' "S60TMM CALIrORNIA GAS COMPANY - - By s= Title: �;j' • CITY or RANCHO WCAMONGA i BY Titles BY Titles IMMI - 3 - � � J .l u •f u m q 0 O 01 N ^ I ^ • m" m d N P1 .-1 IV a O r y a N O. m N q m Y1 •-1 O . pp 1 al m n �• D� ` n N p~p O n •4 rl P q P q O •• h PI P � P wNl j .Pj V G'1 H n n 1~�f n a n Ol ♦ 1'1 N A N a • b S N n O) N N at p' q p D ro► ■ o D m .1 n N a n .r �N n G QQD � < u r u +r ♦ 1'1■ H'i Y� O N •D g N N N O /�O q N'DO 14 � �i�y1 i O N 1'1 O m •n1 � AN p y „►, D, y 9�� �tlnp /1 m •-1 O m q P fit N O ..1 Iq q; Y � b ti � �1 N N b b •• ♦ ♦ N � � M qO Y m OG � q Y■ � • b N � n O q q �1 O a M n a m O O • • Yj �•f a 0 N O N m M O P I I u N Y � p•� r u O N n GI N n Y1 a n P G n1 Y M 9 Y � Y a) 17 m •y O m P P 1'1 N �- N_ r LL��11 ^'1 � m W o• .-1 N N b b a a ♦ N y� � F• O � Y ou O H e.w6M f ~ ►� V v v v� r t 4 Y■ G•r �O8 G O p q11 1 � N N "l'r r ggNRN Y�O ''rII O O 1 p H N 1 O N.1 Y nnOJ 0l0 � M N M .•, N O 1 .1 m `1' VI O q 4 .�I .�i i�0 .�i •�4 °■�s� a�oD. ►fit ; n w ♦ nw Di����� C p9NNNna uw0 YwOOOOO YSS Op v Yo•nnq•VO Y 401 � t0 a �P'1 T P N � n bA bINV igNN.`i .`••`I Y O O N n N N •1 q pp m: q♦ p■ SNNOOO D 1 ~y� Y ±••r • .� n P b O) O A ON aO Ywy .-1 •..IyOO C Y W � q~ Y V C n N N ri O P f'1 q q M 1'• 6' •'1 aI O •Y •1 p S > S Y OI v Op m n A N b 0 q V P N L Y Y O Y N N m r1 N O f•1 M nl � Y {� � K o. M< w N r1 a N N �'1 1'1 OI v � v v ♦i v v Y � T Y O • D O � a u• py r .nD r O o eal a n o u Y ■ • M G OC D Y .I S O O m O 0 N N I'1 a •Y y 0 q >•^Dw n •d Dole n n y •1 n n O Y m O Yl fJ O 0 p► N N N N rl N w1 N N N N Y n Y Y Y Y M Y Y ~ N Y n O • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 1 O d � M lw H M M M N tiN H � /1r ON 7t N.l 1 L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,p STAFF REPORT via. DATE: December 16, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Deferral of Refuse Pate Adjustment RECOMMENDAitON: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file correspondence from the three refuse haulers concerning deferral of consideration, of annual refuse rate adjustment until such time as the County of San Bernardino increases their disposal site fee during this year. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to our refute franchise agreements (residential and commercial) charges of service (rates) may be revised once annually in December to be effective in January. The last rate adjustment was requested in December, 1986 and was the first since 1987. We have received correspondence from the three refuse haulers, basically stating there have been no major changes in the cost of providing service. Although, there are indications from the County of San Bernardino that there may be a substantial rate increase for disposal site fees during this yea•. The refuse haulers are requesting the City Council defer the annual rate review until such time as the County has adjusted their disposal site fees during 1988. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, feel free to contact me. RAR :boa wencs C�'� % 2a- iICBQ A�SPQSAT� P.O. Box A 9 ORTIC} (� Bt lime Phone(714)087 -3717 Decker 7, 1987 City of Rancho Qnc w nga - p.0. Boc 807 Rancho Qwammga, CA 91730 Re: postponement of Refuse Fate Adjustment ilmorable Mayor and Mmbera of the City Camcil: Rmwho Disposal is a fran hised-fefuse collector, operating under permit r f c m the City of Rancho Qra®oga. Qs fratrbise agn me nt provides for an mural request for rate adjustment on January first. 'Eats year the Casty of San Bernadino has ladieated it may increaso the. disposal site fee in July 1988. CmveTwntl , to are reT"ti% a postponement of any possible rats ad- justment until farther information on the county's proposed increaseiia received. Shia will amble us to properly evaluate the impact that action will have on our costs. Tnank you for yovr_kind.conaideration of this proposal. Very truly yo:-'ra, RAMM DLSTaD & SERVICE, IM. U D SR CC M Sox 1 • Ake lane. CWWJo 41701 • 7ekphono (M) 987.4410 4 4 December 7, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of The City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, C1 91730 Yukon Disposal Service ban a refuse disposal agreement, with the City of n Rancho Cucamon ?a, which provides for rate review annually on January lat. However, at this time we are not requesting any rate review. I would like to bring to your attention, that the,County of San Bernardino k will be increasing landfill disposal fees in 1988, passiblk in July._ > When we know something more definite, we would then be asking you for a rate review. 2 As always, it is a pleasure to sawn you. We anticipate your cooperation ou this important matter. SincereL /lyy Y011A 3, Ll � E AVAKIAH ,/PRESIDENT YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE JA dr ay ai A December 10, 1987 Western Waste Industries ` 1370) REDWOOD AVCNUc CHINO, CA01710 (711)601.1714 Honorable Mayor Dannis Stout and Honorable Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Cal.fornia 91730 Attention: Lauren Wasearmam Wants= Waste Industries has relinquished its option to petirion for a rate adjustment in January of 1988. In this regard, we are informed by the County of San Bernardino that a landfill increase will be coming en, or about July of 1988. We, therefore, will not ask for an adjustcent until such time the County !-creases the tipping fee. Respectfully, Al Simouisn Vice President AS lac cc Robert Rizzo M 5' .I • "9 .•e t: t J :F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE, December 16, 1987 TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council PROMS Robert A Rizzo, Assistant City Manager By, Jerry B. Pulwood, Resource Center Coordinator SUBJECT, Approval of Junior Programmer and Programmer/ Operator upgrrdos. Staff recommends the City Council approve the upgrading of , the Junior Programmer and Programmer /Operator positions to the Programmer level and setting the salary range code steps _ at 387 -437 ($7,387 - $3,063 monthly). , RVALUATI04s As the GIS (Geographical Information Systems) staff has , evnlved into MIS (Management Information Systems) requiring additional functions of the staffr it has necessitated that staffing be of highly qualified individuals in specific related areas. To achieve this expertise it requires the upgrade of both the Junior Programmer and Progxammor /Operator positions, and allow us to become eompetitl -e within the marketplace. Tha Administrative Sorvtces Department has `• allocated additional funds for these upgrades in account 01- 4151 -70 « and the remainder of funds are available i.-S, account 33 -4130 -1100. Ix. will not require additional funding from the General Fund Attached for your review is a job doscxiption of the Programmez position. Respectfully submi tad, o rt o Assistant C y Manager 1 RAR,JBPesgr ty Attachment ` r 4 PROGRAMMER FOSITION Assist with implementation of Management Information Services and Geographic Information System; involving complex and highly technical work involving systems design, programming, testing, user assistance, installation, operation and maintenance of hardware and software Supervision is under the general direction of the Systems Analyst /Programmer. EXAMPLFS OF DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to the followings Programming in Henco Info, ESRI ORC, Cobol, Fortran 77, Oracal, Info, C languages, H PL1 as applicable Design user applications using structured programming techniques. Assist and users with IBM A.T set up and usage of software packages such as Lotus 123, DBase III Plus, Microsoft Window etc. Database administration of the various database files on Prime Computer System 2755 Systems administration functions including login assignments, library installations, etc. Assist with computer operations, functions, schedules and system activities Knowledge of Henco Info, Oracal, Info, ESRI Arc, Cobol, Fortran 77 and C Programming languages. Experience on Prime 2655 or 2755, Wang Computers, NBI Systems and IBM ATs Knowledge of system installation, operation and maintenance including operating system concepts/ peripheral equipment maintenance methods and procedures; should be familiar with structured programming techniques and layouts Knowledge of Geographic Information Systems is a plus Any combination equivalent to experience and education that could likely provide the required knowledge and abilities would be qualifying A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would bet .'.i' �'i'` "'.�'- :..4!`5�aiit�.•J' ;' - ,. C•�,^ ;"r.. ' �°:r ^:',J "T4 :. r y Y n'.,'�ni�'� +tv.•y"'s`y' It PROGRAMMER Page 2 _ '• "} EXPEP.IENCE - 1 _ Four years increasingly responsible experience ins• programming, systems analysis, geoprocessing, information ' management, system analyst, systems,' operation ,and Some ° supervisory experience. EDUCATION - Equivalent to a Bachelor -S degree with major course 'work-in Computer Seivnco, Information Management, Prograsming: or' relutea fields. e- 1 �i. -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1907 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manage BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval to Redeem Bonds. Publish and Msil Notice of Redemption for Surplus funds Withi: The Storm Drain Channel (06 -2) for AVVrpxima� $96.000. Approval to redeem bonds, publish and mail the Notice : Redemption to bondholders reflecting $96,000.00 of surplus funds. EVALUATION: There In a surplus of funded interest within The Storm Drain Channel (66 -2) totaling approximately 696,000. A reduction in interest expense is realizable within this district by redeeming outstanding bonds early. Respectf -Ily sub tted, �aort Assistant C ty Mnnagar RAR:JBF:I= Attachment: Notice of Redemption I?9 ■ .W s 'rs NOTICE OP REDEMPTION TO THE HOLDERS OP: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STORM DRAIN CHANNEL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86 -2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (The -Agency") has called for redemption on March 2, 1988, 895,000 principal amount of the Agency's "City of Rancho Cucamonga Storm Drain Channel Bonds, Assessment District No. 86 -2" (the "Banda ") at the redemption price of 103% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. The Bonds to be redeemed are as follows: Bond Certificate Numbers Amount of Redemption 60 66,000 66 5,000 70 5,000 74 5,000 77 8,000 80 5,000 83 5,000 85 5,000 87 5,000 B9 5,000 91 5,000 92 5,000 93 5,000 96 5,000 98 5,000 106 5,000 110 5,000 117 5,000 On March 2, 1988, the Bonds or portion thereof, designated for redemption will become due and payable at the abo•re- stated redemption price and payment will be made upon presentation and surrender at Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Corporate Agency Service Center, Bond and Coupon Processing, 55 Hawthorne Street, 8th Floor, San Francisco, CA (if delivered) or P.O. Box 37109, San Francisco, CA 96137 (if mailed) or at Its Corporate Agency Division, 555 South Flower Street, 5th Floor, Loa Angeles, CA (if delivered). 30 3l Interest payable March.2, 1988, will be paid in the usual y .. manner on presentation. " From and after March 2, 1988, interest *hall cease to accrue :y on the Bonds called for redemption. " All holders submitting their Honda must also submit a fora W -9 in order to avoid a 20% back -up withholding under-the Interest and Dividend Sax Compliance Act of 1983. Failure '. to provide a completed W -9 will result in a 20% back -up withholding to bondholders. The form W -9 may be,obtained from the Internal Revenue Service. CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Dated+ December 17, 1987 ' 3l DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Parcel Map 10617 loc..ted on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, submitted by BCE Development RECOMff1 RATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10617 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis /Background Parcel Map 10617 was approved by the Plan' g Commission on Movenber 10, 1987, for the division of 16.93 acres of land into 10 parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues. Improvements are to be constructed at the Limn of building permit issuance. Respectf i Led, r R Attachment 3 .�- t n 0"I vii RESOLUTION NO. D ? (06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10617 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10617) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10617, submitted by BCE • Development and consisting of 20 parcels, located on the south'side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenue:, being a division of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map No. 6725, as per map filed 10 Book 67, pages,4 thru 7, inclusive, In the the County San Bernardino, the office of recorder of of State of California was approved by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 10617 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. S NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 10617 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. Q� I t�h zo �� U A a � �, O U U �- M.- *. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �cw STAFF REPORT 0/ h o DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council, and City Manager FROM: Jim !tart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: APPROPRIATIONS RECOREEIDATION: Allocate available fund balance 4147,914) in SO 300 (Fund 19) for slurry-seal program. BACKGROUND: When the 1987 -88 fiscal year budget was prepared, tle funds available from the SO 300 fund were not immediately determinable. There appeared a fund balance would exist, but staff was reluctant to establish appropriations until an available fund balance could be determined after the year -end audit. The audit is now complete and accepted by Council, which determines the SO 300 fund balance. Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH:cv „r' ^, A' +1 T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 �^ TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: Linda R. Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Partial release of a portion of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for lots 8, 9, 10, 11 of Parcel Map 6725, located south of Foothill Boulevard north" of Arrow Highway, between Red Oat Street and Elm Avenue, submitted BCE Development RECOMMDATION: It is recommended that the ..,until adopt the attached Resolution releasing a portion of the subject agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to cause said release to record. Background /Analysis A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by Council on August 10, 1981, and recorded on September 10, 1981, as document No. 81- 201600 in the office of the County Recorder, San Beenardino County, California. The agreement was for the median island on Foothill Boulevard adjacent to Parcel Map 6725. The developer has paid the sum of $86,300.35 for the future construction of the median Island on Foothill Boulevard. The payment of said fee releases the Real Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement on the following Parcels: P.M. . Parcel 6725 6 6725 8 6725 9 6725 10 6725 11 6206 26 A Re u 5u ltted, R -?6 3LTe We-, . _ t RESOLUTION M0. 97 -(;( 3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA', RELEASING A REAL-PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DAON CORPORATION' WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 81-115 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and L1en Agreement from Daon Corporation ;and n, WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement k� was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on September 10, 1981, as Document No. 81- 201600 ;and ` WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. _ ROW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. e ''' 4} ?v 0 y i� `Z O Q � � 0 x yy STAFF REPORT Date: December 15, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager �CJ� From: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer By: Turning Mamsaang, Engineering Aide Subject: Approval of the Ervironsental Initial Study, Parts I and 11, for the proposed Slurry Seal Program 1987 -88 (Phase I) for various City streets and approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RECOMIEIDATIDM: It is hereby recommended that the Initial Study, Part I, Environmental Review Application and Part I1, Environmental Checklist be reviewed and approved by the City Council and that a Notice of Exemption be approved for filing with the County Clerk for the project under the guidelines of . the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKf710111D/AMALYSIS• In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, projects to maintain existing roadway streets without widening have peen predetermined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are designated for 'Categorical Exemption' from environmental review. Said streets to be rehabilitated have been broken into nine districts. The vicinity and site maps are hereto attached. Said improvements generclly entail 1) asphalt - rubber crack and joint tPaling. 2) removal and replacement of asphalt concrete pavement prior to crack ealing and placement of slurry seal mixture, 3) slurry application, and 4) the repainting or restrfping of the pavements for traffic control. Res ly sunmltted, R I:TM: Attachment i Z9 RESOLUTION NO. C A RESOLUTION -OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 'OF RANCHO COCAMONGk APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY.- AND, ISSUANCV OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPUSED,-SLURRY.SEAT. PROGRAM, 1987 -88 (PHASE`I)- FOR VARIOUS.CITY STREETS WHEREAS, the City "Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning 'the proposed Slum Seal, Progrm;, 1987 -88 (Phase I); and WHEREAS, said program requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Study has been prepared pursuant to the California environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, _ BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environment --T- assessment Initial Study and issuance of a ^atLgorical Exemption for the proposed Slurry Seal Program, 1987 -98 (Phase I). Section 2: The City Clerk is dlrwcted to file a Notice of Exemption pursuan me California Environmental Quality Act. 1%Q d GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Won receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no siggnificant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 12) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title: Slurry Seal Program. 1987 -88 (Phase I) Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 801, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 989 -1862 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Blane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer same address and phone number as above Location of Project: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Various City Streets Assessor's Parcel No.: Public Streets List other permits necessary from loc=i, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: None y1 PRDJECT DEscRipTim Proposed use or proposed project: The nrojec tirosists of 6sphalt- rubber' "crack --- and joint sealing, removal and replacement of roadway pavement slurry applicatlot,. .and repainting or restrlptna of the oavenants for traffic control Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, yy° If any: 45.11 Acres No existing or proposed buildings 4 ' 8 Describe the environmental setting of tht project site incl7ding information on topography, so Stability, p ants (tries), land anlmals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of "surrounJing properties, °'and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The protect sites are located in developed residential tracts All — street improvements have existed for several years The proposed improvements _Will not have a gubstantial impact tin plants or animals and land resources or —obvious historical, cultural or scenic aspects Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact No ILI 5 ILI 1 -2 S. Remove any existing trees? How many? NoIIe, X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flannables or explosives? _ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 2. Noise and vibration will increase at tho oroiect site , ily during slum sealing operations. After comoletici of Project, noise and vibration levels will return to existing levels. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: None 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 3 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 135 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATI0N: l hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the ftets, statements. and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Engineering Division. Date: IZ -7 -87 Signature K Title—Associate—Civil Engineer 1 -3 43 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in grouid contours? _ A- 2. 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? E _ 3. Create a substantial change to demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? A- 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ E S. Remove any existing trees? How many? NoIIe, X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flannables or explosives? _ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 2. Noise and vibration will increase at tho oroiect site , ily during slum sealing operations. After comoletici of Project, noise and vibration levels will return to existing levels. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: None 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 3 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 135 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATI0N: l hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the ftets, statements. and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Engineering Division. Date: IZ -7 -87 Signature K Title—Associate—Civil Engineer 1 -3 43 �"� •'.it't•i�..�-rr "'ivii�.;"�w`iy ," -� .,. - "- - __ -. .r }o - v i.>s.Y_,_so�i ( a n3 Model# irr uid f of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price flange i ^, RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of`'dancho Cucamonga Planning Division in' order to ,aid the school district in. 'assessing "their ability to accomnadatetthe proposed residential development. e0avelopers are .r raquired to secure; letters from the school district for -accomodating the x increased number of students prior to issuance of building,pererits. c Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific location of Protect: _ rt G PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 ; TOTnL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: - 3. Date proposed to • begin construction: 'M 4. Earliest dale of occupancy: Model# irr uid f of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price flange 'M 1 S CITY Or IANCRO CUCAMIONCA PART II - INITIAL STUDI ENVIRONlMMAL CHECKLIST DATE: nprpmhpr 7 log? APPLICANT: City of Ranchu Cucamonga FILTXO DATE: naramlhnr,l6. 1987 LOG NUMBER: 15 -1637 -8050 , PROJECT: Slurry Seal Proergm. 1987 -88 (Phase I) PROJECT LOCATION:_Lity of Nancho Cucamonga Various City Streets " I. ENVIRO.y.MLNTAL THPACTS (Explaastion of all "yea" and "maybe" anewars are requirad on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Sails and Ceoloav, will the prolosal have significant results in: a, Unstable ground toacitinov or in changes in gaulogic relaticesh:ps? _- b. Disruptions, displacmana, eompsetlon or buLial of the soil? X `- Q, Chcngs in topography or ground surface contour intervals? - _• X d. The destruction, covering or mo,-.ification of euy unique geologic or physical Concerns? X •• 707 Potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditona? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? S. Exposure If people ar property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or aimilar hazards? _ X —_ h. An inclosse ie the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? X 2. Nydreloj . will the proposal have significant results in: �"r I w. Mange Sr ohs characteristics of species, ' 1 ®= 3ud.gg diversity, distribution, or number x of any species of plants? _ , geducclon of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _• _ YES MAYBE NO " a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemaral stream channels? x b. Changes in absorption ra:es, drainage patterns, or the rate and accuat of surface voter runoff? x e. Alterations to the course or flow of flood voters? I x ' d. Change in the asmmt of surface water In any body of water? x a. Discharge Into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? x f. Alteration of groundvattr characteristics? x g. Change In the gwnticy of groundvaters. tither through direct additions or with- drawals, ot• through Interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? ,x h. The reduction in the amount of water other - vise available for p0lic water sippllos? x I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seicher? x 3. Air Quality. Hill the proposal have significant results ins a. Constant or periodic aft en"21ons from sobile or indirect sources? x Stationary sources? b. Dararioration of aabiant air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards' x c. Altarntion of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or tauperaturat x A. Biota Flora. will 'he Ftoposal have significant results In. w. Mange Sr ohs characteristics of species, ' 1 ®= 3ud.gg diversity, distribution, or number x of any species of plants? _ , geducclon of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _• _ RIM n YES MAYBE so G. Introduction of new or aisruptive species of s, plants intq an area? x to - d. Reduction In the potential for agricultural _ production? X _ Fauna. Will the propocal'hava significant results in: s. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? _ 17 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ X c. Intrcduct Lan of now or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier r . .o the migration or anvnvmc at animals? � X {' d. Deterioration or removal o:' existing fish or a wildlife habitat? _ X 'K t+ S. population. Will the proposal. have significant results Ins t sa. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, divarsiry, or growth rate of X r, the human population of an area? _ b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 6. Soeio- Economic Factors. W111 the proposal have significant results Sat i a. Change in local or regional sucto-aconomic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? _ X b. Will project Goats be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? X 7. Land Use and planning Cons iderat to -is. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? _ X $ G. An Impact upon the qulatty or quantity of existing aonx=ptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? X n Page G* YES HAM 40 i g, Tr&ns ortatian. Will the proposal have significant results in% a' a. 0eseration of substantial addieional vehicular movcancT X — h. dffeces on existing streets, or demand for i new strut construction? R r, C6 Effects on existing parking facilities, or i demand for new parking? d. Substantial Impact upon existing transport&- ' tion system? x r e. Alcecations to preset pattern@ of circula- tion or mvesnt of people and /or goods? X ,_ b -' t. Alterations to or effects as prevent and potenclal water- borne, rail, sus transit or air traffic? _ __ x {. Iaeruus in traffic hazards to morns vehicles, yx' bicyclists or pedestrians? _ 1 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have rem significant results ins a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paluntological, red /oz historical resources? x • 30. Health. Pafetr, and Nuisance yeetors. Will the } proposal have si {nitieec zesulca !ns a. Croatian of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X _ b. Exposure of people to yotantial health hazards? x c A rink of explosion or release of hazardous x substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogeeic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? X e. Increase in existing noise levels? J. f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? _ _ X S. The creation of objectionable odors? _ __ X h. An increase in light or glare? X y'1"y 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: -� e. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic. vista or view? H b. The creaticr. of an aesthetically offaulva site? "." C. A conflict with the objective of designstad or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a slgnificant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: v a. Electrie power? yt b. Natural or pccka$cd gas? C. Communications systems? d. Water supply? . e, Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? I. Police protection? J. Schools? t. Paris or other recreational facilities? 1. Nalntacanca of public facilities, including roads mi flood control facilities? M. Other gc ,arnmentsl services? 11. Eno F and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have slgniflunc zasuIts in a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? e. An increase in the demacd for davelcpms::t of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption cf non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? 49 ,.._ Y =S UISE NO x _ x x _ x x x x _ x x x x x x _ x z x x See Attache& Sheets • Page 6 C; 0 YES MAYBE- NO a. Subsuatial depleticn of any nonrenewable or searei natural rescurte? 16, Mandatory pindic -s st ^!a -iii " a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the emltonnent; •3 "> substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, ;( :{ eswe a fish or wildlife population to drop below salt Iwt , at"ag levels, y }� xg ghreatan to eliminate a plant or animal coi —malty, reduce the number or restrict the real., of a rare or endangered plant or animal or mliminate ' Isporoant examples of the major periods of rnia blstory r or prehistory? 1 ', b, Does the project have the potential to achieve -- — „? ro- short -ten, to the disadvantage of long -tern, environmental goals? (A short -ten impact on the environment Y- is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - term Impacts will endure wail into the future). 1 Does the project have Impacts which are — w individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (C,,,ulatively considerable 7 means that the incremental affects of as individual project Ira considerable when f viewed in eonnacticn with the effects of past projects, and probable future X projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial i' adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? _ II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIR010tEENyAL EVALilAIION the abova queatlans (propo plus a dtscwsion of ed mltigaelonemeasures).o See Attache& Sheets • Page 6 C; 0 r s III. DETEAYINATION •`Z' On the basis of this initial evaluatioaj ❑I fivi the proposed project CGDLD NOT have a significant affect on the envirocnent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION uill be prepared. - 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant f, act on the enviraaaant; there will not be a significant affect in this case because the sd.tigation measures described on an attached shut have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE -? w DECLARATION NILI: BE PREPARED. - OI find the Proposed project MAY have a significant effect on -the „ envirment, and-an ENVIRMIENT IMPACT REPORT is,raquired.• I find the proposed pruject CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19. Class 1(c), Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Date December 7. 1987 (j °',Ilml—� _ Signature Associate Civil Engineer _ Title I 5' '�1 1 34 ,.l i It. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation 1. Soils and Coology _ mae I b. There will be cubgrade soils and aggregate base preparation and -. compaction for the replacement of sections of asphalt concrete pavement. 6. Socio- Economic Factors b. Project costs are equitably distributed among project'benefic,aries through the impleenntation of Systems Development Fees. G. transportation a,b,c,e i g. Duiong slurry sealing operations, traffic and parking,will increase on surrounding - streets near the project perimeter. Alterations also >' trafficahazardso tovaotorivehicless, bicyclists orlpedestrians-du rain - -,- construction can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signs. pi 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors ' o. Existing noise levels will increase due to equipment operationc during Vlr construction, but could be mitigated by the installation of noise attenuators and the restriction of hours of operation of equipment. �J 12. Utilities and Public Service h,i,j. This project will leave an interim effect on the present pattern of circulation of vehicles (i.e., police, fire, school). Such circulation °a pattern Impacts can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. iv 1. The proposed project will improve the pavement surface and sections of pavement subgrade. mae I APPENDIX E .NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Secretary for Resources FROMt City of Rancho Cticaawn9a 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Engineering Divir'on Sacramento, California 93619 Rancho OCucamonga. fA 91730 �( County Clerk County of San Bemardino �g5 x ♦k a rn..h.aa_ave.. 5th Floor Snn.,B ="dtao, C —92415 Vt.rr Spa Pro am 1 87 -88 Phase I Project IL e ro e.: L.xCa on Pec e See A ttadhed Descr -P of Nature, Purpose, an Beneflclarin of Prcjeet ame o e Agency Approving Mlect Cit of Rancho Cucamon a Name of rson or Agency Carrying Out Project Exempt 5tatust Check One Ministerial (Sec. 13073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 13071 W) Emergency Project (See. 13071 (b) and (e)) Categorical Exemption. State type and section numb-r. tot_ California Environmental quality Act Reasons pro ect exempt Richard Cote 714 989-1862 321 rea Contact Person A Coe Telephone Extension It filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes _ No _ Date Received for Filing 12/16/87 'Ity i ninenr 71c1e 301 53 qOfICE OF EXIDIPTION ATTACHMNT Pro :t Descri tion: The project involves asphalt-rubber cra k and joint', 'o "on* I r T-9 WN Be Lser-M—na 7o —ex s Wngroadway pavement; rtmval and replacement oic sections 'of asphalt concrete p&vewnt�and subgrade; slurry sealing ap?,licatiOn.-and the reps i nting/restriPing of pavement striping/markings for tra fic control. Project Beneficiaries - : The irimary beneficiaries of the project wlllnb�e the r gd-- o enW-,-If-Ure--n7tgIborhoods in which the streets are located. Secondary beneficiari-Is will be the vehicular and pedestrian traffic that- emploj,09 streets as their pattern of circulation. (MBs 6 { { {r 7 v 8 l i j" MOUI TAI'S !AN 1 J& • I r .wau x N. .Iµr+i ]i ru Igo t - - �.. °�l � � ZIP C x O�5 t N p ti VIGINIMA INDEX:IMAP ` •'�� ; _ S� 6 i• 3 W W N J C W m LEGEND DISTRICT NO- I [= SLURRY SEAL W Z W Q 2 d J J W S CITYOFRANMCUCAMO NTS TITLE `AN, .Y SLURRY TEAL PROtRAM SITE MAP 9 C., toss -ss N 19h LEGEND 0 19TH � utS� ralcT SLURRY SEAL CITYOFRANGHOCUG NO.2 SLURRY SEAL PROOIRAY 1987-86 C C ll� NTS TITLE SITE MAP N W W F � W h I .J I } X W m D ® SLURRY SEAL DISTRICT NO.3 CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA NTS TITLE SLURRY SEAL F{l09RAM 4 SITE 1907 - 00 SV N HILLSIDE RD- HILLSIDE ROAD I �' W W W D: w z N w w a co $$ O Z J_ MAN y j y }�} ZA ITA V Y„ :i GOLDEN TREET OLDe w DEN w S W S = O Q J Z q J = 4 r ¢ CIRCLj w w M I L � "[ J 9l �� � u �/�i w W m LL W --- AN_— 11 STREET RANI_ YAN STREET F LEGEND 1 DISTRICT I1 F0- �4 �tt © SLURRY SEAL —«uoy: TITLE CITYOFIiANCI�O CllC' `- �'� ,y SITE MAPS SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM �f- 1917 - ii EGEND © SLURRY SEAL X DISTRICT o. a CITYOFRANCW NTS TITLE SUltltY SEAL PROGRAM SITE isa� _ of N w EGEND DISTRICT NO. 6 J SLURRY SEAL I ■ CITYOF,RANCHO N` TS TITLE _. �-� SITE MAP �ii� 3L1lRRY ![AL PROGRAM T Ci �ss� - sa lv 72: 'JI IL SAN a I a u; r i' W W z W a > o O z w a �;• a i3 a f V _ W W a 7 t z C F �Y i y y O R `v f,. Q t } 3 W Z z O J W > J i FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EGEND DISTRICT NO- i SLURRY SEAL ��y�y� CITYOF,RANCHOCiJGA[�II TITLE c L=' '. � SITE MAP SLURRY TEAL PROiRAM � l a �9 es�a -ta Y DI STRICT CjTYoFRANCHo MOMMM NTS TITLE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM SITE MAP N 7L;1TYOFRANCHOCJJCNACWA NTS TITLE 1RR11 ![AL PROlRAM SITE MAF 14, ■l — CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 00t- T0 : City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Maps; Agreements for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions; and Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tracts 13440, 13441, 13442 and 13445 located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by The William Lyon Company RECOMMENMTICN It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tracts 13440, 13441, 13442 and 13445, accepting the subject agreements and securities and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said maps and Agreements for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions to record. AYALYSIS /BACKGROUND The following tracts located in the Victoria Planned Community, were approved by the Planning Commission: Tract 13440 May 13, 1987 Tract 13441 June 24, 1987 Tract 13442 May E2, 1987 Tract 13445 July 22, 1987 The Developer, The William Lyon Company, is submitting agreements and securities to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: IM Faith /Perform Labor/Material MontrDentation Bond Bond Bond Tract 13440 $379,000 $189,500 $ 8,550 Tract 13441 300,000 150,000 7,650 Tract 13442 612,000 306,000 10,000 Tract 13445 724,000 362,000 13,150 IM CCSR DECEMBER 16, 1987, •'r PAGE 2 )V` ..y The developer has submitted tre Agreements to Postpone Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions until building permits are issued, o- Copies of the agreements and securities are available in the City Clerk'a Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. F Re 1 ubmitted, LB:sd Attachments b 0 f 1, RESOLUTION Ro. O 7 fin% 5 '- CUR SOLUTION'OF 'WE CITY C,aiNCII Li� THE My OF RANCl* IMCANY GA, CALIFORNIA, APPRDVING'UTROVEMENT AGREEMENTS EW..NT SECURITIES AND FINAL MASS of TRACTS 13440, „I 13441, 13442 and 13445 submitted WHEREAS, the TenLatfve Naps of Tracts 13440 13441 13442 and 13445 Sub Planned �y Th5 Ni111ae (yon Co pang. Subdivider,�loeated in the Victoria Planned Coaeunity have been, submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said the divider tate OfnCalifornia,bnndain compliance with the rrcqufrLmeents of Ordinance t No. 28 of said City; end Ems, Final moat file raqufrenents established as proraquisite to approval of the Final Maps of said Tracts said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreements submitted herewith for approval and execution by sald- City, together with goad and sufficient Improvappro Securities, and sudalts" for approval said Final Maps offering for drOveme on far public use to streets delineated thereon, Rancho CucamongaERjEirn/e1 asEfolllowwsby city Council of the City of 1. That said Ioprovenent are Agreeaxnts be end to sass approved and the Mayor Is authorized to execute same authorized ttosattest theretooand Clerk Is 2. That said Ieproveaent Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approvai as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3• That the offers for dedication and the Final Maps delineating exxecute app behal4 Of said City, 6'7 MH IM V MM.tiM s M TRACT / ,-e J 13442 w Y TRACT 13443 � VIII TRACT 13444 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGII4EMMG DIVMON ........... 1 strYe caws noes wwa Y. e1W YY. 1 X 1 M I 11 no 7ITE1[: asaaee4 TRACT 13440 1941.1 and 13445 1 r� — E {• "yn';3r `' _ „' yi ±. «.:y�:= ti.•+'<° .• ..._�:•- - T.' ' %t' ,.az y:v...a =.rriY, c i e � . ,tiF•_ RESOLUTION No, A RESOLUT'.ON.OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO NILLALIMOL CALIFORNIA. AAPPROVAL THE MYOCOMPANYOR POSTPONEMENT CF OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACTS 13440, 13441, 13442 AND 13445 C % submitted HEM' the Tentative Maps of Tracts 13440, 13441, 13442 and 13445, y The William Lyon Company, Subdivider, located in the Victoria Planned Community were conditionally approved to prepare Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC 8 R's) in ccnpliance with standards established by-the ay City; and WHEREAS, to meet the rcqufrements as a prerequisite to approval of x bufldin Into 9 permits for the prop osed devetumaent said subdivider has entered City. the agreements submitted herewith for approval and erecution by said HON, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: y` I• That said agreements be and the samo are approved and the Mayor Ia authorized to execute seam on behalf of R , sold City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest theroto and cause same to be recorued upon said execution. :T. :w N 3 x • 69 ;�t> 'w ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 fi TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contra..: for the Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation improvement Protect located between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard awarded to Fontana Paving, Incorporated, for the amount of $104,892.60 to be funded from Systems Development Fund REC011ODATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Protect and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $115,500.00, ($104,892.60 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Systems Development Fund. Background /Analysis On December 2, 1987, City Council awarded the subject protect to Fontana Paving, Incorporated. Staff has received from Fontana Paring, Incorporated axecuted contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Res f ;,!tted, � RHM: cc: Purchasing I� =r� 70 r A iK•. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 4M DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue,_ and Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive Improvement Project awarded to Moore Electric Contracting for the amount of $133,777,00 to be funded from TDA. Article 8 fund3 RECLMODATIOM: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to eyecute the contract documents for the Traffic Signal, and Safety Lighting at Carnelian Street at Vineyard Avenue, and Carnelian Street at Red Hill Country Club Drive Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $147,500,00, ($133,777.00 plus 1Dt contingency) to be funded from TDA, Article 8 funds. Background /Analysis On December 2, 1987, City Council awarded the subject project to Moore Electric Contracting. Staff has received from Moore Electric Contracting executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found than to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Re zpe s mated, RHti: :dlw� cc: Purchasing %/ ,i V; RECCM ODATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, arl Base Line cc t op Project, a( authorize Administrative to expend $21598.0 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from IDA, Article B. funds. Background /Analysts On December 2, 1987, City Council awarded the subject project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated. Staff has received from Hovey Electric, Incorporated executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be compiete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp lly submitted, R cc: Purchasing t .x — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, and Base Line Road at Spruce Street Improvement Project awarded to Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for the amount of $215,984.00 to be funded from TDA, Article 8, funds RECCM ODATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue at 6th Street, Haven Avenue at Jersey Boulevard, arl Base Line cc t op Project, a( authorize Administrative to expend $21598.0 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from IDA, Article B. funds. Background /Analysts On December 2, 1987, City Council awarded the subject project to Hovey Electric, Incorporated. Staff has received from Hovey Electric, Incorporated executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be compiete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp lly submitted, R cc: Purchasing t .x CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 6IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InspeRt?rV SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for DR 84 -18 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept -said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 573,981.00. Background /Analysis DR 84 -18 - located on the east side of Archibald Avenue south of 7th Street. DEVELCPER: Martin J. Jaska 4761 Arrow Hwy Montclair, CA 91763 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $73,981.00 Res f submitted, f R "'. 73 - - r' RESOLUTION NO. 97 -64- / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 84 -18 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK r a. ,� rr WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 84 -18 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. r. ° L x - iz A /f� !r W 1: yy. nx — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA .I STAFF REPORT GATE: 0ecember 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Hanager FROM: Russell H, Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 'illllland, Public Works Inspecw.� SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion NXCMEWTION: acceptable manners and�itYeiss reecoreended that C1ty bCaunefl�acceepptisain and authorize the CityeClerkCtoorelease the FaithfulNPerformance Bondiin the amount of 560,000, Background /Analysis DR 85-10 - located between AwthYst Street and Archibald Avenue, south of 0EVELOPER: The Olympus Group 3184 -G Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $60,000 R Rf 75 r$ I OR aaa OR U -10 MO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLLTION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for OR 85-10 have been completed to the satisftction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the woric is hereby accepted and the City Eng ;noer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with Use County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 4� YN e .�ILLz _ ,VY, 1yM1�PG RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOKGA, C&IFORNIA,-ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS F OR aaa OR U -10 MO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLLTION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for OR 85-10 have been completed to the satisftction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the woric is hereby accepted and the City Eng ;noer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with Use County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 4� YN e ■4 IL CITY OF RANCHO CUCA310NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager- FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of i.oapletion RECOOK"TION: The required street improvements for OR 86 -19 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended Umt City Council accept -said file 6 N04ice of andrauthorize the City clerk to releaseethe Faithful Performance Bondi in the amount of $146,000, Background /Analysis OR 86 -19 - located on Utica Avenue, south of Jersey Boulevard DEVELOPER: Western Relco 1404 Dove Street, Suite 630 Newport 8sarh, CA Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $146,000 jsa L ubmitted, C • •s 77 1 RESOLUTION Wo. ,•1 Cri t'e A RESOLUTIOX OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCd, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMEMiS FOR OR 86 -19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the constructfon of public IMkrcvcmants for OR 86 -19 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Congletion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. the City Engineer Iss0authorizedrto resolved. and afile a Notice ofCompletioe giihd the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. -79 .t'.i r,- ,>.a „s..d ,`iv'- ,a.�+'• +r_•;f =i =: ?: _c.y x -�.. �:: �r- ��� x�i's'.� .: a -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1 DATE: December :6, 1987 TO: City Council and City Menager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve N, Gilliland, Pubiic Works Irspectkt�-t� SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONNE111DtTION: The required street improvements for OR 86 -21 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Caplotion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $8,000. Background /Analysis OR 86 -21 - located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard DEVELOPER: Millwood Development Company 963 Moraga Drive Los Angeles, CA 90069 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $8,000 Re ;I tied:, r FM :sd �9 a 5 Wl 3M 2 RESOLUTION NO. 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86-21 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A*XOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for DR 86-21 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion Is required to be filied, certifying the work cemplete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Barnardina County. am ry ;7" a w� �rn.�_ a r•s .,, �., a�`:: •,��,�fP("'�,f'.�?Rr,'. -�k ev ";.,•x z-)•� _ ^. i,._fy,Aq.^ac.Y..y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOR T, DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect+ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion WXGIP031DATION: The required street improvements for DR -8448 have been corpleted in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Englcaar to file a Notice of -e' I* and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance and in the amount of $7,500 Background /Analysis DR 8448 - located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue ani 6th Street DEVELOPER: The Second RC Group 937 Via Leta,, Suite 100 Colton, CA 92324 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $7,500 Resp submitted, s w,r,: C-j7L-` g � T tw ]�pf RESOLUTj IOH NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGR, CALIFORNIA, ACCE)TING THE PUBLIC IIPROYENENTs FOR OR 84 -48 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public t�4rovements for OR 84-48 have been cospleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and , WHEREAS, A Notice of COSpletfon is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Enggineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. C-j7L-` g � T 0% r RECOMMONTIoN: The required street improvements for CUP 85 -01 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recomended that City Council accept said, Improvements. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion- and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perform,nce1ond in the amount of $66,000. Background /Analysis CUP 88 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue DEVELOPER: Gary Kanter Associates 623 W. Arrow Highway San Dimas, CA 91773 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $66,000 ResFsd fitted, M t r e 1. G: a� — CITY OF RANCHO CUCATIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMONTIoN: The required street improvements for CUP 85 -01 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recomended that City Council accept said, Improvements. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion- and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perform,nce1ond in the amount of $66,000. Background /Analysis CUP 88 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue DEVELOPER: Gary Kanter Associates 623 W. Arrow Highway San Dimas, CA 91773 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $66,000 ResFsd fitted, M t r e 1. G: a� ti �Ni• v RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION "OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKIGA; CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 85 -01 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE "OF COMPLETION FOR'TK WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public 1 rovements for CUP 85 -01 have been comp leted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;•and , WHEREAS, a Notice of Coaplotion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. En aue resolved. that e hereby City Engineer s authorized to signa dfila Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. d� a\ i . 0 ,, E' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector oQM6 SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion REf,wMTlOK: The required street improvements for Tract 12184 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said and authoorize tha Cityeclerk0to releaseethe Faithful NPerformanco Bond in the amunt of $267,000. Background /Analysis Tract 12184 - located on tho east side of Beryl Street south of Base Line Road. DEVELOPER: Town and Country Development 133 North Pixley Orange, CA 92668 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $267,000 4R;7,-� WN:SMG:dlw M 14- MEN I a E 0 L�i'P_y ° -. •ti^'."2,•..: `�y'+_3,Lj�p7.if'� z cr .. ._ �„ _ C, >�.• ., RESOLUTION NO. S 72 ,i� 73 e.� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'RANCHO FOR CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROYENENTS J• FOR TRACT 1FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF 'A NOTICE OF 3 t, CgPLETIOM FOR THE NORK r *r WHEREAS, the construction of public 1 rove�ents for Tract 121&1 have been caapleted Co the satisfaction of the City Engineer; afo {, fire WHETS. a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying work oaplete. _ fv NON. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and } the City Engineer 1z authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Sx U a. r. s CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond fcrTract 12801 -1 RECOIIENDATIBM: It is recoanended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to -elease the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in Materials and workmanship. Release: i DEVELOPER: The Deer Creek Company 8480 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $18,800.00 87 M 0 M, E, 1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectoc --5- v.- SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12721 ■ RECONNNOATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects % materials and workmanship. DEYELOPER: Robertson Homes 1003 Cooley Drive, Suite 102 Colton, CA 92324 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $5.100.00 '® . .i F I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for MOR 87 -40 located on the east side of Beryl Street between Base Line Road and 19th Street, submitted by Hichiel Pfannenstiel REC0WADATIOH It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALIS /BACKGROUND MDR 97 -40 located at 6943 Beryl Street was approved by the City Planner on September 16, 1987. The Developer, Michael Pfannenstiel, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bcnd: $5,500 Labor and Material Bond: $2,750 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res mltted, R .LB:s Attachments $Q RESOLUTION NO. 97-(- 7 y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREFAFNT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -40 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on November 20, 1987, by Michael Pfannenstiel as developer, for the imprcydnent of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 6943 Beryl Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,iunctien with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Minor Develcpment Review No. 87 -40; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by - good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Inprovement Sr;urity be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 90 ^� J L c x, ;a J CM OF R"CHO CUCAMOIVGA riCiIIVaMWa DIMON L rax.- i V n ZTl?Z Aif n_ a :7 �}- l N ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA�r *a STAFF REPORT r DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SU0.IECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86-14 located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Civic Center Drive, submitted by Haven Investors I RECONIENDATIM It t recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND OR 86 -14 located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Civic Center Drive, in the Industrial Park Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 27, 1986. The Developer, Haven Investors I, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements to the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $2,500 Labor and Material Bond: $1,250 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Hater District. C.C. &R.'s have been approved by the City Attorney. Resnael, gul s bmltted, eLf. ' Attachments qZ v A ey i c r RESOLUTION NO. C ? - (075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 06 -14 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed or. October 7, 1987, by Haven Investors I as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Arrow Route; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 86 -14; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the tame are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. q3 CPPy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGUMMwG DrvmGN +.:,lI- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.AtONGA r- STAFF REPORT ; DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for street improvements on Haven Avenue, between Church StrW and Bass Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, a General Partnership RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accept.ng the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Prior to actual development of its property on Haven Avenue in the Te"L Vista Planned Community, Lewis Hanes of California is submitting an Improvement Agreement and Security for the improvements on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Church Street and Base Line Road in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $144,500 Labor and Material Bond: $ 72,250 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Attachments Y i n i� ?G 7� w f •�4 m i; r� C S •�y.' ;tom- � .• ' � i'A Lr•� nay • + x p v RESOLUTION NO. 6 -?-40 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT` AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY'FOR HAVEN AVENUE, BEiWEEN CHURCH STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an lcprovement Agreement executed an November 18, 1987, by Lewis HOmese0f California, a General Partnership as developer, for the improvement of" public right- of- way,adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Church Street and Base Line Road; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, ig to be done prior to the development of said real property; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by tho City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 7 f. ;:. `TG t 4� :r e A i. 3 BASELINE ROAD 0I. m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ENGDMMIN i DNWON LZ'i1. N Tm& Tzrro 1&4 o:- DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engiceer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician E4% So Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Brad R. Hastings, for a single fammily residence, located on the east side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. Background /Analysis The developer, Brad R. Hastings, of 5530 Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road, requested a building permit for a single family residence. Street improvements are a condition of Issuing the building permit. The City does not require said improvements to be built at this time. Therefore, the developer, Brad R. Hastings, has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the Improvements on Crooked Creek Drive. A copy of the Agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. a;---mated, 1 l� M 1 r 99 ,; RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF PJIHLHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REAL-PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM BRAD R. HASTINGS AND AUTHORIZING ." THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN'THE SANE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement -' established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for 5530 Crooked Creek Drive has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Brad R. Hastings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Ceunci: ;,i the C14y cf - -- Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. r 99 ,; y Y zIv c �o M Ca , MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGWEMMG DrVMoK rent: EXEnPR Creak Drive a9 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s STAFF REPORT'' Date: December 16, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: Gideon V. Agra -jbW - Subject: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 with Wilson- Sheenan and Associates for the additional scope of work for Amethyst Street -19th Street Improvement Project to provide inlcuuded innthe originalpscope of work. aThee5amount nonot to exceed $10,124.00 will bring the contract total to $24,532.00, to be ;unded from Systems Development Fund. REg2LW- RTION• The Contract Change Order in the amount of 510,124.00 fromthe Systems Development Fund is recommended for acceptance by the City Council and authorize the Mayor to sign same upon Council approval. RAACKWOUND /A W.YSIS An additional scope of design work is proposed in the Change Order with concept discussed by the attached letter. A portion of storm drain line per Master Plan Storm Drain II along 19th Street with lateral going north along Amethyst is proposed to be constructed In conjunction with the street project. This scope of work provides a relief from storm water nuisance frequently occurring in the area during rainy season. Respect submitted, RHM. Attachment 11: /Oi _J. CITY OF PJLIM CUCANpN6A ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER mal Services to prepare Plans, specificatins and estimate for Avenue - 19th Street Storm Drain and Street Improvements Date: 12 -3 -87 You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. Design Survey in Contract Price In Contract Price StormlDrainePlansanSpeclflcationssign, and estimate along 19th Street from $10,124.00 Hellman aYenue to 300' East of Amethyst Avenue and alorg Amethyst Avenue from 19th Street to State Highway 30 TOTAL $10,124.00 This is a Portion of Area II and Area YI NastSr Plan Storm Drain One Hundured Twent CFouraand o0 /100 (=) (increased) by the sum of: Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,124.00 ---�- The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will 6e:Twent Four Thousand Five Hundred Thir Two and no /100 Dollars ($24,5 The Contract period provided for completion will be (IncrMed)(Decreased) (Unchanged) 32 working Days This document will b c suppleme;rt to the Contract and all hereto. provisions will apply Requested: r usse a y ng neer Accepted: - .BCdC`i�Q� 9�_ a ng neer Approved: a ayor, y o anc o ucamnnga 5, /O.;I_ •1 . _ Y� �J L -K }Y5/yp•'� .{y .y yyam�,, =may v, CITY OF RANCHO CJUCAJWA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Professional Services to prepare plans, speclficatins and estimate for t� Aaethyst Avenue - 19th Street Storm Drain and Street Improveuents Date: 12 -3 -87 TO: Nilson- Sheean and Associates Inc. ng neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. UE_tZR7f1UN OF CHANGES OECRLAbL --INCREASE Design Survey in Contract Price In Contract Price Hydrology Review and Hydraulic Design, $10,124.00 Storm Drain Plans, Specifications and estimate along 19th Street from Hellman avenue to 300' East of Arsatgyst Avenue and along Amethyst Avenue from 11th Street to State Highway 30 TDTAL $10,124.00 This is a portion of Area II and Area VI Master Plan Storm Drain The amount of the Contract will be (9eera6a�ad) (Increased) by the sum of: Ten Thousand One Hundred Twenty Four and no /100 Dollars ($10,124.00 — j The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be :Twenty Four Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Two and no /100 Dollars ($24,5.iM -- - The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) 32 working Days This document will b I supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: us=Lnglnce-r g neer �a � e Acce P ted:s Approved: Mayor, City Of anc o GucamonFa Vate s n arm on a us as o 0 agreement dated: February 5, 1987 CO 87-13 1W a if ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: December 16, 1981 To: City Council and City Manager From: Ruas211 H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Blane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer -gam Subject: Approve and execute Contract Change Order Uo. 5. to C.O. 86- 46 for Archibald Avenue Entry -Monuments '(construction drawings) with Forma for an additional fee of Five Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars ($5,260.00) being paid Orom Beautification Funds RECOMMOMATIOY• Approve and execute Contract Change Order No. 1 to C.O. 86 -46 R, for Archibald Avenue Entry Monuments (construction drawings) with Foraut for an additional fee of Five Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars ($5,260.00). being paid from the Beautification Fund BACKGROUND /AMYSIS• The subject Change Order covers additional workings by Forma to provide drawings for the sidewalk as configured around the existing street widths providing for an ultimate widening of the street at the 4th Street intersection. The second portion of the Change Order provides for the preparation of two ceramic mosaic plaques featuring the City logo. Res f t su fitted, r pam Attachment: C.C.O. Form 103 :.i 5 e ';. CITY OF RAWW COCA*W ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHA.4GE ORDER _ il. Archibald Avenue (Construction Drawings)MoC.rO.n84 -46 er .. z 11- 1811 -18 -87 v, r T0: FORMA 190 He art Center Drive Ne crt Beach CA 92660 g neer You are hereby requested to comply i engineering services. y the following changes from the agreewant for 1. Construction document changes to accomodate in Contract Price in Contract Price the addition of interim landscaping 2. Mosaic panels for Ent $2,960.00 (Design and Cons_action�roments $2,000.00 + 155 52,300.00 TOTAL: $5,260.00 �TiTCA1TOTi— _ 1. Need for an interim sidewalk construction concept to ccnsider. 2. Mosaic designs for panel to be provided by sibconsultant. The aanunt of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sum of: Five Thousand Two hundred and Six and no /100 - �oTTars (55,260.00 The Contract .otel including this and previous Change Orders will be: Sixteen Thousand Two Hrndred Ten and no /100 The Contract period provided for c Days aPletion will be ( Increased) (pecreased) (ltrc— h This document will hereto. Requested: /s Accepted. supDlemeot to the Contract and all provisions will aPD1Y cngi veer % </ Approved: ate rcv mayor, a ro o camgnga agreement dated: loy r, s; z I� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA� STAFF REPORT Date: December 16, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager Vi From: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer/pWf- Subject: Approval of Agreement for '13tallation of Public Improvement Dedication between 'pCty of Rancho Cucamonga StretFrontage Imroveents at 9820 Arrow Route, located on the north slda of Arrow Route between Archibald and Turner RECMIMIC ITION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution Dedication between JuliatM for riego and the City of Public Ra Rancho Improvement amonna. and BACICGADM /AIW.TSIS The attached subject Agreement between tte City and Julia M. Priego provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, dirve approaches, street lights and street pavements along the Prlego Arrow Route Frontage. Julia M. Priego has agreed to grant b the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening rd improvement of Arrow Route In return for the construction of said improttments. Said street improvements will be constructed in coojuction with the City's A•wrn Route Phase I Street Improvement Project from Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue. Kasper ttte su RHM:JL . Attachment ACS ` 1 M e' ' 2yU RESOLUTION'NO. -; A RES VT'ION!_-QF THE-CITY COUNCIL OF THE= CITY,OF f RANCHO CUCANCRi6A, CALIFORNIA., ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT' FOR', INSTALLATION' OF PUBLIC IMPROYEWNT:tiAND', DEDICATION FROM JULIA N. PRIEGO, AND AUTHORIZING THE .• MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish rejuiraxnts for construction of frontage improvements in,' conjunction with the Avow Route,Phasa'I Street Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach;'sidwalk, } street lights and street pavements located at 4824 Arran Route, to be made, part of the Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement,Projxt;:and - WHEREAS, Julia M. Priego has agreed to dedicate Right -of -Way as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED. that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • M e' ' 2yU DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16. 1987 City Council ,ad Citv Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Seek, Engineering Technician ■ Approval mmprovement Real Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 87 -09 located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Schlosser Forge Company and Phillip D., Elaine M., Jeffrey P. and Jacqueline L. Schlosser and Albert M. and Roberta J. Holquin RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreements ted security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND OR 87 -09 located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, in the Industrial Develooment District, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 27, 1987. The Developer, Schlosser Forge Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $406,000 Labor and Material Bond: $204,000 A Drainage Acceptance Agreement for drainage from Arrow Route and d Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route have been submitted also. l0'1 H _x m s; CCSR DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available,in the Ciy Clerk's Office. - - A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater District. An Access and Maintenance Agreement his been approved by the - City Attorney Reso:s ectfu submitted, Attachments i n ,i.j. i =I. Ov RESOLUTION NO. 7*7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAXLHO- CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY,IMPROVEHENT CONTRACT - AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM PHILLIP 0., ELAINE N:, JEFFREY P. AND JACQUELINE-L. SCHLOSSER AND ALBERT W. ANO-ROBERTA'J' HOLQUIN AND AUTHORIZING-THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO Sl&i THE SAME in, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ado pted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requ'lrements%for construction of public improvements in conjunction with buildlng'permlt Issuance; and WHEREAS, undergrounding of existing overhead utilities established as prerequisite to issuance of a building permit for DR 87-09 has been met,by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien,Agreement by Phillip D., Elaine M., Jeffrey P. and Jacqueline L. Schlosser and Albert W.-- and Roberta J. Holquin. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, I:uthorizesthe Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 109 RESOLUTION no. R % ' (- 0 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT AND AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVSaT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW No. 87 -09 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration A Drainage Acceptance Agreement and en Improvement Agreement executed on October 21, 1987, by Scholosser Forge, as devaroper, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the — scuthwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement an.1 subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 87 -D9: and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement, ;nd Route. WHEREAS, said drainage agreement accepts water draining from Arrow NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto , and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said drainage agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clark to cause said drainage agreement to record. RT '• 4 v .ARROW ROUTG CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENaRiEEMWO DWWoH rtm. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF 11ANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1987 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Butler, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner M I RECOIOMMATION: Staff recommends that the City Council grant by minute a: o s approval to award and execute the Professional services Agreement. II. BACKGROUND: As part of the '81 -88 work program for the Planning v s on, a City Council authorized the p operation and completion of the technical updates to the General Plan. Part of the overall work program of the General Plan update included a concurrent updating of the General Plan EIR. As part of this work program for the General Plan EIR update, $22,000 has been earmarked for the engagement of professional services to assist in its coepletto;.. Prior to selee.ing a firm to complete ttie General Plan EIR update, staff first solicited Requests for Qualifications (RFQ) from eight firms. Fo-ir firms responded to our RFQ and submitted their Statements of Qualification. Of the submitted statements, the Planning Network seemed to offer Lye greatest number of advartages, inaluling a proven track record, available expertise to accomplish the work program, and familiarity with the area. In additiar. the company office proximity to the City maximizes our ability to comaxinicate. As a result, staff elected to pursue a Professional Service Agreement with the Planning Network ResG_tfull u tted, Wtl BB:BC:vc Attachments: Professional Services Agreement lie-. r„ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day �. of 1907, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as `CITY') and Inland Planning Group, d.b.a. Planning Network, i California Corporation (hereinafter referred t0 as CONSULTANT'). A. Recitals. ' (i) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Qualifications pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of the technical update to the Environmental Impact Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan ('Project* hereafter). III) CONSULTANT has now submitted its Statement of Qualifications for the performance of such services. V (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional 7= services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter i ? defined. NON. TiIEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT a: follows: i' B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: The development of and preparation of the technical update to the Environmental Impact Report for the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan described in Exhibit "A' Scope of Services hereto including, but: not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, raports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, nublie hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in ardor to complete the project. -1- 113 (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phases �. of the project, including -any and all procedures, development plan;, sups, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptr..e and certification by the City Council as the decision arcking body of the Lead Lc. Agency as set forth in Exhibit 'B' Project Schedule attached hereto. .:a 2. CONSULTANT agrees at follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit 'A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY ` statutes, regula. ions, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable rp• so' sfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT' shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'documents') including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit 'A' to a CITY within the time specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit "B'. Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit 'A'. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANi shall thereafter make such revisions to said k documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive re:' ;" documents in y' such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set foi,S pursuant to this Section M(b) may be extended upon a written ` approval of CITY. ' (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the avant any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further aireet that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maxim sum of 522,000.00 for the performance of the services requires' hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made to accordance with the schedule set fortn in Exhibit 'C". _2 IN -1 A. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are VI received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C' either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 9SS of individual task totals ' described in Exhibit 'A'. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay t; CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and Till content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in i. accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 'CO. Charges for c' additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by s CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are .eceived by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: S (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available frcm CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it shall be CONSU TRW's responsibility to make the initial contact and to be ultimately responsible for all gathering of such information. S. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports and computer tapes /disks prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT _g. 11.,!r 1z ` CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and •= :P, materials as CONSULTANi may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specificetions except at the site x intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, Its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of ha. the CONSULTANT shell be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written 'Notice of Termination' to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at xy CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth In Exhibit 'C', on a pro- rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, ph -itographs, reports, and computer tapes /discs whether in draft or final farm, preparea by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, Invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this Paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Lloyd Iola (Principal), Kent Armstrong (Senior Planner), and Griselda Maldonado (Planner), Planning hetwork, 2940 East 'G' Street, Suite 105, Ontario, CA 91764. Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof to the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shell CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the -4- 116 -� ... . subcunrractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall Furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persona whom it say employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer %hall ;ecure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT pr;or to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 4 an aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against 1'ability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commoncing the performance of the work of this Agreement`. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage; Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expenso. CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to anyone person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for prop,3rty damage. (c) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companie- licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall new as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, otfic3rs, ;_ployees, and agents. All pnlicies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, insured and all subcontractors valve the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and acints; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that my be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified -5- 111 Mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may Zy effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agree2ent. 9. Indemnification; CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save ,? harmless CITY, its elected and appointed oFficials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to Y ry persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this 1 Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential da4ages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent o. CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors ;, under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and constrred in accor0ance with the laws of the State of California. ct 13. Attorney's Fees; In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Correction of Errors, Project Revisions: CONSULTANT shall revise or rewrite project to correct all deficiencies in full satisfaction of all CITY claims, and shall revise or rewrite project as necessary in response to requests of the Planning Comaission /City Council as necessary for the EIR Update to be certified. 15. Nretings To Be Attended: CONSULTANT shall be obligated to meet with CITY staff and representatives of other agencies and organizations as will be necessary to complete CONSULTANT'S obligations. CONSULTANT shall also be obligated to attend thosc public hearings and workshops spc_ified in the Scope of Services. V, .a, 16. City Review Of Work: _ CITY staff shall reviev all documents, . data, studies, surveh, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and computer- v tapes /,1sks, within four:aen {14,' calendar days, and notify CONSULTANT, to writing, of ambiguities, discrepancies, deftciancies,,,aaissfons, or errors which its review indicates are contained in such data or documents. 17. Current Information: The information used shall be the most current available obtained from-the comonly,used and expected sources for the type of data collected. Tne' CONSULTANT shall make known,to the CITY the sources of all information gathered,in the compilation of the project. 18. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in.writing, between the parties with- respect to subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which its not embodied harefn nor any other agreament, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effec ?'ve only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT l�ifi p a Tiaa Lloyd' Zola, President CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMA Dennis L. 5t0ut, Mayor ATTEST: every A. u e e , y e' rTc -- _ Recommended for Approval A red as to tors: if �,i 4 �i C_ sf ■ .r EXHIBIT 'A' SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Purposes of Project 1. To update General Plan EIR and technical appendices to current, usable and legal status. 2.' To prepare a land use inventory of acres of varying land use designations and to determino ratio of developed and undeveloped for each of the land use designations. 3. Contingencies - Revise or rewrite project as necessary to correct errors and obtain City Council certification. 4. To prepare 'Build -Out Calculatinns' for City as basis of Land Use /Demographics Data Base Network. - S. To prepare a Master Environmental Assessment to create a single source physical /biological inventory for the entire City. B. Daties/Tasks 1. Research, collection and analysis of data in the following areas: A. Land Use 1. Land Use Inventory A) City to provide per acre inventory of existing land use based cn General Plan Land Use designations. b) Consultant to provide inventory of developed and non - developed acreage for each land use category. 2. Build -Out Calculations a) Consultant to provide print -outs in tabular, spread sheet form by traffic zone. 3. Spheres of Influence a) Analysis o7 land use alternr.tives. 1) Development per existing County regulations as compared to development per City General Plan Designations. b) Prepare alternativas Land Use.Map and Table. ' "L 0 .7 6- 3'O - t� Ii ,A A-2 11 a '.. B. Housing 1. Build -Out Calculations i a) City to provide Department of Finance summaries for housing units and housing element for background informmtion. _ b) Consultant to determine ultimate number of housing units by typo, vacancy (estimated), absorption rates (estimated), housing starts trends /projections, etc. c) Provide descriptive ups and tables. C. Population 1. City to provide 'Community Profiies" and Department of Finance Summaries. ar_ 2. Consultant to provide: v+ a) Historical trends b) Projections c) Buiie -out calculations d) Persons per household average City -wide and by housing type t e) Descriptive maps, tables, etc. D. Economic Development 1. City to provide available inforvation from "Community Profiles', Chamber of Commerce, Redevelopment Agency, Urban " Research Assoc. Study and listing of recent approvals (subsequent to 1/1/06) for all cmmercial /industrial projects. 2. Consultant to provide: a) Characteristics of labor force - age, irv;Loe, education, etc. b) Characteristics of employers - types of industry, number of employees, etc. c) Build -out calculations - number of acres /squait feet of comercial and industrial, employment needs, etc. d) Market analysis - median /mean incosae, retail sales, absorption rate (estimated), vacancy rates (estimated), etc. e) Descriptive maps, tables, qtr ,A A-2 11 �;- E. Transportation it � 1. City to provide current Ctty -wide traffic stuQ/ and existing .) y traffic counts. ; " 2. Consultant to provide: a) Traffic counts, where needed (aaxlsua! 10 locations). (YES b) Malysis of adequacy of transportation element with respect �. to: 1) Level of service (based on City Traffic Model) 2) and the Foothill t(based r- Freeway on City Traffic 3) Public transit - existing and projected 4) Rail, air transportation - existing and projected ,1 j; 51 Relationship between tend use and transportation- 6) Altervmtive transportation - bike, equestrian trails (map of existing and proposed systems) �r S c) Descriptive saps, tables, etc. F. Public Facilities & Services 1. Existing conditions and needs (based on existing plans) In terpmstof; 7- 7 a) General goverment b) Domestic water c) Sewage - include analysis of 1981 Sewer System Master plan of CCSD d) Solid waste management e) Storm drain f) Flood control g) Emergency services - law enforcement, fire, medical h) Schools 1) Libraries 2. Descriptive maps, tables, eta. " •i A-4 G. Natural Resources 1. City to provide background information from existing General _ Plan 2. Consultant to provide (based on existing data) inventory of: a) Water sos,uu*� D�l b) Soil 8 agriculture ? c) Vegetation i Wdlife Y,v d) Extractive (mining) aw e) Air w f) Scenic 3. Descriptive raps, tables, etc. ' H. Health 6 Safety C 1. City to provide background information from existing General 4 0. Plan k 2. Consultant to provide (based on existing data) inventory of: a) Geologic & seisr4c b) Flood " c) Fire t, d) Emergency response e) Noise (estimates) 3. Using build -out calculations, Consultant to project existing conditions to build -out to determine future conditions 4. Descriptive maps, tables, etc. 1. Co®unity Services 1. Parks h Recreation a) City to provide background information as to existing and proposed parks. b) Using build -out calculations, Consultant is to project future needs. c) Descriptive maps, tables, etc. A-4 2. Cultural Resources a) archaeological findingse(based potential n existing for a) b) Consultant to analyze current inventory of historic landmarks. 1) City to provide existing inventory of historic landmarks. c) Descriptive maps, tables, etc. 2. Synthesize collected data into text, maps, graphs, tables, charges, renderings, etc. A. Updated General Plan EIR incorporated into Master Environmental Assessment. B. Land use & population data to serve as foundation of database network. 1) System designed in such a way as to be easily maintained and updated on a regular basis. C. Land use inventory. C. Products i, 1 Harter Environmental Assessment a) Synthesize into single document. b) Compilation and organization of research data and background Information. complete inventory of Physical & biological characteristics of the City and it spher f influcence c) identification of potential impacts. d) unavoidable consequences associated withmprOJecAn measures and e) Statement of overriding Considerations (if applicable). f) Products on computer disks to be compatible with City system. 2. Land Use Inventory a) Breakdown of City by General Plan Land Use Designation on a per acre basis. 1) Breakdown into areas of developed n non - developed for each category. b) Consultant to provide methodology to facilitate City in updating this program and keeping it current on a continual basis. y, � M5(� ..a�a:rex,r rti MIN c products W be on computer, disk to •be compatible with 'Ci system. d) City to supply current aerial photography. 3. Build-out Calculations J, a) Provide land use and demographic data to funitiWas foundation of future Data0ase Network.-, I b) Consultant to 'provide methodology to facilitate City Aii,.updatinq J "is program and keeping it current on a continual baiil;.� 0 Products to be on computer disk to be compatible frith City system. D. Copies of Documents: 1. Consultant to provide 50 copies of draft document to City by the time specified in the project schedule per attached Exhibit V. g!. rovide 10 copies of ial document to theicity by the Consultant 'to p n W time specified the project schedulfe per attached Exhib t . in 3. Upon certification by the City Council of the final document, the Consultant shall provide 40 copies of the final document as adopted within ten (10) days of the certfficati�n date. Y �`: •` i•F r y`2 t' EXHIBIT '8" PROJECT SCHEDULE •¢jy Task Work Schedulo 1. Award 8 execution of contract December 16, 1987 2. Consultant begins work December 11, 1987 K4 3. Notice of Preparation (NOD) a) Consultant prepares NOP December 17- December 31 a =+ b) Consultant provides 50 copies of completed NDP to City December 31, 1987 r c) C1ty mails MOP by re istered mutt per compiled calling list January 4, 1988 N ". 4. Data Research 8 Collection December 17- February 19 a) City review of information on -going ,y - S. Prepare graft Document February 22 -March 25 5• a) City review of work on -going 6. Final City review E revisions of March 28 -April 15 draft document 7. Draft document complete April 15, 1988 iP a) Consultant to provide 50 copies. 8. Notice of Completion (HOC) a) Consultant prepares WOC April 4 -April 15 b) Consultant provides 50 copies of completed NOC to City April 15, 1988 A4 c) City nails NOC and draft document registered mail per compiled mailing list April 16, 1988 9, 45 -day review period April 16-June 1 a) City /Consultant review of response comments and their incorpo,%tion into draft document on- going. ` s; B-2 l° June 2-June 8 June 8, 1988 June 15, 1988 r. June 8-June 15 June 15, 1988 June 16, 1988 — - June 24, 1968 June 24, 1988 f.. •y 10. Respond.to 6omments'3 prepare final document. 11. Final docuunt complete a) Consultant to Provldo 50 copies 12. City Council public hearing d certlFicatior, of final EIR ' 13. Notict• of Detersdnation (MOD) a) Consultant prepares MOD b) Consultant provides coopWed IUD to City c) City muils•M0D registered mail per compiled sailing 11 s A. Consultant to provide City 40 copies of final EIR as certified by City Counci: 15. Project complete s; B-2 l° June 2-June 8 June 8, 1988 June 15, 1988 r. June 8-June 15 June 15, 1988 June 16, 1988 — - June 24, 1968 June 24, 1988 f.. •y I skJ LL 'W o i IL De� W� a._= zm X Paz 0 i� i=8 a a pp ii ad z:d i 4 C O 9 C n o e A 8 -3 127 O n V On 23 e d r 0 Lp ay s� n� n 3 �§ 53 -salt 5m 0 I '6 s �. as z.d . oa o d e S d- i �a EXHIBIT 10 Payment Schedule* • Eased on lump sum ampunts for 1ndl..dual tasks y t. YORK ELMT/HAH HOU1S MATRIX a. Lloyd Kant Grlsalds Support Total Aro@tmv Hat tlonado Staff Hans coat .........TASK ...........Zola ........................... ............................... }r WD 115E 3 6 24 4 33 $1,315 ""ING 3 16 16 4 35 51,705 • POPULATION 2 4 12 2 18 5650 ECOYOIIO OEVELOPIEXT 6 20 20 S 46 12,400 TRANSPOWA71ON 6 20 12 4 30 $2,090 RALIG FACILITIES G SERVICES 0 24 30 6 62 $3,150 1 { KAnsm RESOUKCES 2 6 16 3 24 51,130 HEALTH L SAFETY 2 6 16 3 24 $1,130 , COa51KITT SERVICES 3 16 16 4 35 SI'm DOCWEMT PREPARATION 3 20 40 40 63 53,925 OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES $2,240 TOTAL 522,000 Reimbursible Expenses 1 Out -of- pocket expanses (travel, telephone, messenger services, lodging, meals, etc.): cost. plus 15 percent For diem charge for subsistence may be negotiated in lieu of expenses for daily lodging and meals. 2. Subconsultants: coat, plus 15 percent. 3 Blueprint, reproduction and photographic services: cost, plus 15 percent handling a Passenger cars: $0.25 per mile and parking fees when applicable. 5 Photocopies: SO 10 per page. C -2 130 1 1 , C11' - r „r W4 x'. 5 R EXHIBIT "C" - Fee Schedule* ` * based on hourly rates Program Formulation /Strategy /Expert Testimony . . . $85 Principal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $75 Project Manager /Senior Project Designer . . . . . . $80 Senior Planner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $55 Project Planner /Project Designer . . . . . . . . . $45 Planner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40 Support Staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $30 Deliveries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15 Reimbursible Expenses 1 Out -of- pocket expanses (travel, telephone, messenger services, lodging, meals, etc.): cost. plus 15 percent For diem charge for subsistence may be negotiated in lieu of expenses for daily lodging and meals. 2. Subconsultants: coat, plus 15 percent. 3 Blueprint, reproduction and photographic services: cost, plus 15 percent handling a Passenger cars: $0.25 per mile and parking fees when applicable. 5 Photocopies: SO 10 per page. C -2 130 1 1 , C11' - r „r W4 _, — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI`fONGA STAFF REPORT Date: Decerbor 16, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Richard R. Cot &, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and La Belle- Marvin, incorperated, for Soils Investigation and Pavement Evaluation - and Analysis for Haven Avenue between the North and °auth City Limits and for Fourth Street (westbound lanes only) between the East and West City Limits. Tha not -to- exceed fee of $15,672.00 will be funded by Systems Development Funds. It is hereby recvommmended that the City Council approve and execute the above subject Professional Services Agreement with LaBelle- Msrvin, incorporated. Results derived frua the proposed soils investigation and pavement evaluation and analysis will provide the Engineering Division with data regarding the existing pavement structural conditions of both Haven Avenue and Fourth Street. With this data. the Engineering Division can compare the existing pavement factors and proceed to develop desired design criteria for needed roadway rehabilitation on said streets. The City's 1966 Pavement Management Systems Inventory classified Haven Avenue in •fair• condition and Fourth Street ir, •poor• condition. The proposed services include, but are not limited to, pavement deflection testing to determine 1n -situ pavement strengths and pavement corinys to determine existing pavement section thicknesses, underlying subgrade types, conditions and strengths. JRespe submitted, RFC4: ✓ r — C.ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: December 16, 1987 ilti' �CJ� To: City Council and Ci ^y Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Richard R. CUta, Associate Civil Engineer ,,M� Subject: Approval of Vie Professional Services Agreement butween the WY of Rancho "Cucamonga and OeLeuw, Cather -ind Company, Engineers and Planners for the preparation of P?-Aimirary Engineering Studies for various proposed railroad crossing improvements throughout the City anu the associated preparation of Public Utilities Commission Applications for Railroad Crossing Iiaproveeent Funding under the Federal Highway Safety Art, Section 203 Funds and for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications_ and engineers cost estimate for said crossings as outlined on the attached Exhibit "A", Scope of Services. The net -to- exceed fee of $109,000.00 will be funded by Systems Development Funds. It is hereby recocimended that the City Council approve and execute the above subject professional Services Agreewent with DeLeuw, Cather and Coapany. BACRr,TillilQ /A &YSIS Our City tss numerous railroad crossings within our limits with both the Southern r'aclfic Transportation (SPT Co.) and the Atchison,. Topeka and Santa Fe (AT 8 SF) Companies. The Engineering Division is r'recting its efforts in -ddressing crossing improvements at key location,* in order to initiate and obtain from said companies, commitments for laid crossing improvements or removal of such lines as the Southe n Pacific Transportation Company, which appears to have very little ser,ice. Crossing improvemments would include, but not be limited to railway widening, installation /replacement of railroad crossing warning devices and gates, installation of rubberized crossing pads and the construction of concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalk and street lights. ) 3�- a .. 4 �Y s a LC 0ecembs: 16, 1921 Past 2 The c-,oscirgs being addressed at this time are: PL'L Applicatinn Design 1. East Avenue at SPT Co. x _ 2. Havcn Avenue at VT Co. x x 3. Hermosa Avenue at SPT Co. x 4. Ramona Avenue at SPT Co. X S. Amethyst Avenue at SPT Co, x x 6. Hellman ?Wenuo at SPT Co. x x 7. Foothill Boulevard at SPT Co.(Underpast) x B. Etionda Avenue at AT 6 SF x 9. Turner Avenue at AT 8 SF x 10. Herman Avenue at AT 8 SF x 11. Baker Avenue at AT A SF x x Engagement if a firm such as DeLeuw, Catter and Coc,iany mould facilitate the City's efforts in addressing said improvements before agencies like the Public Utilities Commission, as ezll as tho rogni: ant railway companies. Rasp ysbmitted, IULM_ /`3 w:mm` ( 1'I '1 i ? �= 193 •a� r• i r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,A STAFF REPORT DATE: Oeeember 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Richard Cota, Associate Civil Englnesrr$uYI� SUBJECT: Approval of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Engineers for the preparation of design plans, contract specifications and engineer's estimates on the Hellman Avenue Stara Drain from Monte Vista Street to the Cucamonga Creek south of Bate Line Road. The not -to- exceed fee of $26,800.00 wilt be funded from Drainage Fees. RECOMMENDATION. It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above subject Profcssional Services Agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers. Background /Analysis The proposed Hellman Avenue Storm Drain from Monte Vista Street to the Cucamonga Creek is intended to direct storm and nuisance runoff within a storm drain pipe to be placed under Hellman Avenue. This proposed drainage system will supplement the existing Beryl - Hellman Concrete Channel which presently directs storm and nuisance runoff onto Hellman Avenue at Monte vista Street. The proposed storm drain will either outlet said runoff directly into the Cucamonga Creek or at a point in Hellman Avenue immediately north of the S -:thern Pacific Transportation Company Railway tracks south of Base Line Road, depending on the outcome of the Cucamonga Creek connection negotiations with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. The proposed drain will be designed to mitigate the 100 -year storm and will also eliminate flooding and nuisance runoff that occurs, due to rainy days and summer landscape watering, across Base Line Read at Hellman Avenue. Respectf. submitted, / RHM:RRC:pam I 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell h. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to award and execute Professional Service Agreement for the inventory and condition analysts of the City's drainage facilities to Don Greek and Associates for the amount of $78,uu0 to be funded from Drainage funds It is recommended that the City Council award the project for the City - Wide drainage facilities inventory and condition analysis to Don Greek and Associates, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for said project and authorise the Administrative Services Director to expend $81,900 ($78,000 plus 5% contingency) to be funded from Drainage funds. BACKGROUND With an already existing demand on the City's drainage facilities and with an anticipated increase in that demand on those facilities due to future development, it has become necessary to research and review the status of those existing facilities. This study will better enable the City to review the need for drainage systems due to future development in addition to setting up maintenance schedules for existing facilities. ANALYSIS This study will consist of reviewing all documentation available pertaining to all drainage systems throughout the City and verifying the existence of those facilities with field inspection. In addition, the consultant will report on the condition, of those systems constructed prior to the City's incorporation. The report will be presented in an acceptable format for later entry into the City's PRIME computer. Re 11 bmitted, e / RFDAtWI_S•id_jyt./ ' !3S v-, t.. ':1 =I — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 l�Yj T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the Advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Ettwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter Improvement Project, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue from Victoria Avenua to 263 feet north of victoria Avenue, and on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from 10 feet south of the SPAR crossing to 280 feet south of the SPAR crossing It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Etiwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter Improvement project, Phase I and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the •Notice Inviting Bids.` Background /Analysis the subject project plans and specifications have been completed by CIA Engineering, inc., reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $26,919.20. Legal advertising is scheduled for December 21 and 22, 1987, with the bid opening at 2:00 pm on Thursday, January 7. 1988. :respect ubmitted, AHM :SA:sd cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION NO. S 7 — 4' 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ETIWANDA AVENUE COBBLE CURB AND GUTTER, PHASE I", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE RIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain impnvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcifications presented u by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and T" specifications for "Etiwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter, Phase I". ` BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and „ directed tr advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or s proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the zfollowing words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIOS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 7th day of January 19BB, sealed bids or proposals for the "Etiwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter, Phase I" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids most be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Etiwanda Avenue Cobble Curb and Gutter, Phase I ". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California 13-7 c a 4" p! ' RESOLUTION - PAGE 7 _ is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Rase Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to arty interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho °. Cucamonga, twenty -five dallare ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for, any Rork done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor-under him,-In violaticn of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly Andentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed tc the provisions in Sections 17:7.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor, under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires tha Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship conrilttee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the ' contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in,such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage_by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or 8. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or ' ' C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on,an annual basis statewide or locally, or 1+3 S ,l QEI RESOLUTION PAGE 3 When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered sppentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is requ'red to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,journeymen in any appreaticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.3 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex- officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for-all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall cAnply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty -five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will inter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall becone the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 13q RESOLUTION PAGE 4 If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of tM. lowest bidder's security shall be apptid by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to'the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1M%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bennd in an amount equal to fifty percent of0claissthe orcontract materials orrsuppli?s work furnishedefory to secure performance ofathent work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class •A• License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law tean ddpursuantitheretodat thettime7t� ethisecont actrises awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the pre`iles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca'ifornia. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $20.00, said $20.01) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. in accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole colt and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld ( performance retention). 14c) m! = RESOLUTIO3' PAGE 5 The City of Rancho•Cucwmga. California, reserves the;righttu reject and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 d PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho- Cucamonga, California this day of 19 Mayor ATTEST. A City Cler-7- I� S�. F,. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1987 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ■ Intent to vacate a portion of the non - vehicular access rights, as dedicated en Parcel Ma;l 6725, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues, and setting the public hearing for January 20, 1988. RECO1001DATIOM: It is recomended the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the public hearing for January 20, 1988, for the vacation of the suhject non - vehicular access rights. Background /A:Ialysis PM 10617 was approved by the Planning Commission an November 10, 1987. A drive approach was approved between Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 10617. The developer BCE Development has requested the vacation of the non - vehicular access rights dedicated to the City on Parcel Map 6725. Vacation of said ,,�,rights will alive access to Parcels 2 and 3. Respectt FS��tygitted, ' r "k RESOLUTION NO. 8 g� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON - VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 9307ei. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the St -eet Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate a port on of the non - vehicular access rights an Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, a City street, as shown on Map No. Y- 075`an file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit °A• and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: -hat the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 20th day of January, —TW, at 7 :30 p.m., in the Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street Is necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be pos conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 30 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: •NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET•. SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the rese•vatlons and excep obi n—,7f aRy, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attesi to tFe same, and the City Clerk shall cause sane to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The a newspaper of general circulation published In the City of Ontario, California, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4 ' 1Y3 .i. DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT o. REFERENCE: PARCEL MAP 10617 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA �< PEQUESI FOR VACATION OF 35 FEET OF NON- VIHICULAR ACCESS (PER PH 6725, PMB 67/4 -7) ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 66) LETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF W%Y LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BEING THE HID -POINT OF THE 35 F00R VACATION, DISTANT 986.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SPRUCE AVENUE, MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND ITS PROLORUATION, FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SPRUCE AVENUE. a! 4' W 12502 * EAP 3-3�'A7 �0 .1 I�(�< � �fi - - aY1��l�:. l�j - l a �.�� � f�yv� y: .. �T��l•, �` t � II' t � tIl f� iii I' ��..�• � � ? - I JU- I T I� i1 11 1.1 l n I 1I 'a, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA %r STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN wununcni u, -w - 6ijr ur nnm.nu LU{:AfxnaiA - A proposal to amend the TTct0r1a community PTan Text to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain comwmity facilities as ;- specified in the Commercial Standards and Community Facility sections of the Victoria Community Plan. I. RECONNEDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that Iffe—IT57c-u-n—Ell approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment 87 -03. II. BACKGROUND: This Amendment came as a result of the City Council's reques fo modify the Victoria Community Plan to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities. The primari purose a' s oc h p a reest is to bring the VictoriCommun pan requirements into consistency with those of thDevelont Code and other Community plans for similar usesparticrly those uses that typically have a greater impact on existing adjacent uses. III. ANALYSIS: The Amendment primarily affects the Community Facility sec on of the Community Plan on Page 241. Minor amendments also occur within the Commercial Standards section, Pages 235 to 239 only to gain internal consistency with regard to Community Facility uses. The amendments are fully described in the attached Planning Commission staff report. Res fully fitted, Bra le City tanner BB:OM:ko Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of November 25, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes of November 25, 1937 City Council Ordinance Amending the Victoria Community Plan l q4 ON WI %iVll ti i A x1'^ __ n S! 6 loy -� ; ✓a' i M s' ".NY4r x:'ldkn $ 5T-. _" 1 {('•r'R.: • x ..r ,�•a•p_ RESOLUTION PAGE 5 The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califnrnia, ttserves the right to reject any, and all bids: By order of the Cour:il of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 14 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Coun_il of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of . 19 ATTEST: city er ___�_ ■c r: �w DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 16, 1987 City Council and City Manaacr IUssall M. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Intent to vacate a portion of the non - vehicular access rights, as dedicated on Parcel Hap 6725, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues, and setting the public hearing for January 20, 1988. RECONM IDATIOM: It is reco- -wended the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the public hearing for January 20, 1988, for the vacation of the subject non - vehicular access rights. Background /Analysis PM 10617 was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1987. A drive approach was approved between Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 10617. The developer BCE Development has requested the vacation of the non - vehicular rcess rights dedicated to the City on Parcel Map 6725. Vacation of said rights will allow access to Parcels 2 and 3. Respect tted. i :L •s =��q+ I RESOLUTION NO. 8 7 (o 91.L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON - VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 6=71F.—seq.. of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate a por ion of the non - vehicular access rights on Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, a City street, as shorn on Map No. V- 075,on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit •A• and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 20th day of Jcnuary, TTM, at 7:30 p.m., in the Lions Park Comity Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining w`ether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street purp ,s. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be pos —e d —conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 30 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET*. SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and excep on'fii any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest %fFe same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the Ci y o n ario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. a? ly3 rS���S��,yd,a ,J!?. r�,,'•'+d'•" lT4 r�iiFki ..; s!♦ _ _ __ '. y ... Aw. t X, WC $Y�tp q ` k r DESCRIPTION ZIHIBIT REFERENCE: PARCEL MAP 10617 CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA'. REQUEST FOR VACATION OF 35 FEET OF NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS (PER PM 6725, PNB 67/4 -7) ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 66) BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A POINT LINE OF BOULEVARD. THE SAID VACATION, FOOTHILL 966'.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SPRUCE AVENUE, MEASURED ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND ITS PROLONGATION, FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SPRUCE AVENUE. m �l IVI o- r �•�ypy, i k4°,ff�:.vY:r7''.w4 +:_ �oY j j o x g 6 LL ,. lit Ii Al - r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN mm�mi at -w - ciir ur mmL"u ::u6N9ura,A - A proposal to y an ex to require a- Conditional Use PeMt ofrrncertain community facilities as specified in the Commercial Standards and Community Facility sections of the Victoria Community Plan. I. RECD WiDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that e aunc 1 approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment 87 -03. II. BACKGROUND: This Amendment came as a result of the City Council's requ— est to modify the Victoria Community Plan to re quire a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities. The primary purpose of such a request is to bring the Victoria Community Plan requirements into consistency with those of the Development Code and other Community Plans for similar uses, particularly those uses that typically have a greater impact on existing adjacent uses. III. ANALYSIS: Ths Amendment primarily affects the Ccemunity Facility section of the Community Plan on Page 241. Minor amendments also occur within the Commercial Standards section, Pages 235 to 239 only to gain internal consistency with regard to Community Facility uses. The amendments are fully described in the attached Planning Commission staff report. Res fully fitted, f Bra le City Manner B8:DM:ko Attachments: Planning Comission Staff Report of November 25, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes of November 25, 1987 City Council Ordinance Amending the Victoria Community Plan /y(o r ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �s �CUCA A4,,�� n CCp a t� DATE: November 25, 1981 T0: Chaiman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PUW pro sa , amen a Victoria ommun an to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities as specified in the Commercial Standards and Community Facilities sections of the Victoria Community Plan. I. BACKGROUND: This amendment is the result of a City Council request oi — swdiTy —fhe Victoria Plan to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities. The primary purpose is to bring the Victoria Plan requirements consistent with that of the Development Code for similar uses, particularly those uses that typically have a greater impact on existing adjacent uses. II. ANALYSIS: A. The amendment primarily affects the Community Facilities section of the Community Plan on page T41. Minor amendments also occur within the Commercial Standard section, Pages 235 to 239 only to gain consistency in regard to the Community Facilities uses. The following amendments, preceding sequentially by page number, are as follows: Page 236 (Exhibit "A ") 1 Delete Item a.(5) Institutional and Governmental Uscs. 2. Delete Izem a.(7) Preschools and Day Care Centers. 3. The remaining items should be re- numbered accordingly. 4. Add Item a.(10) Permitted Community Facilities as listed on page 241. lye ITEM P �o PLANNING C01m1ISSI0 rAFF REPORT VCPA 87 -03 - City or Rancho Cucamwnga November 26, 1987 Page 2 Page 237 (Exhibit 080) 1. Delete that portion of Its c.(8) Public Parks and Playground. 2. Add Its c.(10) Conditionally Permitted Comity Facilities as listed on Page 241. Page 238 (Exhibit 'C') 1. Delete Its a.(S) Governmental Uses. 2. The remaining items should be re- numbered accordingly. Page 239 (Exhibit 'D') _ 1. Add Its a.(12) Permitted Caaawnity Facilities as listed on Page 241. 2. Delete Item c.(2) Parks and Playgrounds, Public and Private. 3. fie remaining items should be re- numbered accordingly. 4. Add Its c.(7) Conditionally Permitted Community Facilities as listed on Page 241. Page 241 (Exhibit 'E') 1. Uses Permitted - The following uses shall be permitted within Residential and Com.ercial Land Use areas in victoria: a. Small family Day Care in the home, providing care for six (6) or less persons. b. Public Park and Playground c. General Open Space uses. d. Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 2. Conditionally Permitted Uses - The following uses shall be permitted within Residential or Commercial Land Use areas in victoria subject to the Conditional Use Permit Y process: - r .Y k v 's r /t/ 8 t PLANNING COMMISSIO JAFF REPORT VCPA 87 -03 = City or Rancho Cucamonga November 25, 1987 Page 3 a. Church b. Club, ledge, fraternity and sorority c. Convalescent center d. Public facility e. Large family Bay Caro in the home, providing care for 7 -12 persons. f. Child Caro centers g. Fire and police station h. Outdoor recreation J. Schools, private and parochial J. Utility or service facility B. Envirouentat Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmenfli OeCKIISt and determined that the modification to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain community facilities will not have a significant impact on the environment. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to consider approval of the Modification e Mnnirg commission must first find that this amendment is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan and the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE This its has Deen sdverttsed as a public hearing ni— ne �aiTy 1[eDOrt newspaper. V RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission cons er a material and public input regarding this modification. If the Commission concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. /yr Y M1 `s X11 i 2 6 mm 6 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU:AMONGA; CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED, COMMUNITY AMENOIR:NT,.87 -03, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO C"UNITYEFACILITIESiA3 SPTJFIED IMNTHE FOR CERTAIN STANDARDS AND COMMNITY FACILITY SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN - follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, does ordain as SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and deterrines'the following: A. That the Planning CommiS7iort of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and b manner prescri ad by law, recommends the Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described, aad this City Council has'held a public hearing in the time and manner, prescribed by law and duly heard and Considered said recommendation. B. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Ceneral Plan of the City of Rancho Cac —•nga. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environsental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Community Plan text of the Victoria Planned Community is hereby Wn-Wnt to read as follows: /SG I l Al `t " 1LPA•87- 03•"W'City or!R&fKh0 Cucamonga November 25, 1987 -< p Page 4 Rasp ly s , red or City pl nner BB:DN:ko Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Page 236 of the Vlctorla.Comonfty pla n Exhibit 'B' - Page 237 of the.Vlctorta Community plan Exhibit 'CO - Pala, -238 of tha Victoria Community plan Exhibit,'04 -- Pa9a 239'of th Victoria Cowntty P1+ Exhibit 'E'.- Page 241 of the Victoria Community pla n Resolution cf Approval , 4iI l } . i COMMERCIALS7^NDAROS (continued) 2. Regional Center a. The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) Retail businesses, including, but not limited tot department stores drug stores 4.-airy stores 6b0000k stores a record stores ' bi- fidelity equipment sales clothing stores musical instrum4nt sales shoe stores candy stores pbctography equipate:.t sales (2) Sevice businesses, including, but not "invited to: watch and jewelry repair ' r. beauty parlors travel agencies locksmiths• banks and financial institutions movie theaters i (3) Administrat ive and professional offices (4) Cccsercial recreation q lei �fts%"Lmvnor and (G)m Restaurants rs- faYA ) Nurseries and garden supply stores, provided that fertilizer of any type shall be sold and stored in packaged form only. (7 public utility offices (6)aM Wholesale business offices with samples on the premises, but not to include general storage (91G1T) Accessory structures and uses necessary or loo) Perini>�i' Commun�y Feu / %f>cs /rs� -y on CITY OF "a '4 87-03 (s-j RAKM CLrAMONGA rmv g3pr_,23G . , e uatomarlly incidental to the -above -Uses A a `;permitted by the Rancho Cu6=cnga Zoni 0. dinanc4. VA C. ;Ussi,p6iiiited subject to specific 'approval, of Conditional Use Permit t* -c.ficilities, not including, r `tom lit (2) Parkinq lets and picking buildiriqs (3) Automobile S'*'Xwica 'stations and car,washei (4) Aut='otiiii, saret' and service OF Zlectric 'distribution snitch stations cmun C' ilon'equipmin.Z buildi'r' (6) C i a (7) Public,itility booster stations (8) Comimeiciai recreation, DoWle ;mxlea aAa.' , 71 •V1 (9) Accessory a . tructures and uses nsceaiar*Y'or cuntomaclly incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use pe=it and the zoning ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CLMNUTA P an w I 0 i R COMMERCIALS ANDARDS (continued) 3. Regional,'Related Land Odes x a. The following general categories of uses shall be permittedt f (1) Retail business, including but not limited tot )departmer. stores e furniture stores autosebils sales pet store-+ motorcycle'sales and service i dome improvement center hardware stares , grocer-,, stores " clothing stores ` meat markets or delicatessens (2) Service business, including but not limited tot banks,- finaaeial institutions automobile repair blueprinting and photostating cleaning and pressing business laundries locksALths mortuaries mechanical auto wash plumbing supply movie theaters photographic supplies or studios equipment rental !i (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Restaurants -{61 Ceregmv heal -usee 5W Commercial G PT Automobile service facilities 7 (A0 Nurseries and garden supply stores, provided that- fertilizer of any type be stored and sold in packaged form only .4 LW Public utility offices MY OF nun YhPA 87 -03 153, RANCW CUD"-)o(vcn Mramac Orvaea`I eumm= �tz�ua ° -•> rr,- ,,,,;q -f (*'4Zitala and"Motels' to Prll-',Solf= sarvict laundry and self-service dry cl*anIWq,f acilities I/ a,21., Acces'Scry structures and uses neegssary"or,• c•stontaiLly Lncidental.to the:*above - usair4s. Permitted by,'thVRancho Cucamcn9&_,,Zoninq,�,,I.'_,' Ox. itted subj*ct to atonditional �io -Pirm, Uses Perm a. it (1) Anima cars faailities' it t A PI Public utility b6oster,,stations W Pa4fting�lots and parking,buildLngs A CST 'Public utility C.xchang*, and. subztaticns.. ar M Public buildings C, pr Accessory structures and,uses necesfi�wry.cr custcMarily incidental 'to' the- above'uses as sptcifically'providid for by the use permit MTOF MW RANCM CLICAWWA MAWi4G MVMLV III COMMUNITY FACIUTIRS The Community Facilities section of the Vic *aria Community Plan is established to'provide for communityraupport uses and those additional uses which are found to be cumpattble with the basic permitted uses by the Site Plan Review Z&u Wza ycwcwuusw. 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses shall be permitted within Residential and Commercial Land Use Areas in Victoria subject to DIevelopLent Approval Process. a. General open space uses b. Schools, churches, and libraries c. Pub7.ic and private recreation facilities d. Establishments for care of children a. Fire stations and other public and quasi- public facilities P. Accessory structues and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the abova as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning ordinance ROAD STANDARDS This section contains specific criteria for the roads within victoria. The Standard Road Section Reference 21an shows the entire planning area and the location of the various kinds of roads. The Standard Road Crosa- Sections follow and they contain information such as the width of the right -of- way, pavement width, number of travel lanes, and the location of walks, bicicle lanes and medians. Each road has been examined individually and the design of the cross - section reflects not only the need for efficient automobile circulation, but also the goals of the plan with respect to land use and unbar ' ,5sign. All road :actions are schematic and do not show any grade gonditions that may exist where the roads are built. CITY CF RANCHO CLMNI NGA . ANNLNG CIL." ra.•. ■s o banks and financial institutions o movie theazers (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Commercial recreation (5; Restaurants (6) Nurseries and garden supl ly halstores, provided that fertilizer of any type sl be sold and store d 1u packaged form only. (7) Public Utility offices -+ (8) Nholesale business offices with samples on the premises, but not to incluen general storage ; (9) Accessary structures and uses'necessary or customarily, incidental to tho above uses as permitted by the'Rancho, Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. (10) Permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241., _ ,t CITY COUNCIL.ORDINANCE N0. <' ' YCPA 87 -03 December 16, 1987 Page 2 ,a,, ._ ,. CO<OEP,CIAL STANDARDS ' -•> �;' `-', ',; _ ._ ; ' , -,. y kf ; 2. Regional Center a. The following general,categories of uses shall be permitted: (1) Retail businesses, including,,bui not limited to:, ' .. 0 departzent stores ..�i ', _ o drug stores o 3emlry stores ; o book stores c record stores o hi- fidelity equipment sales _ o clothing stores - o musical instrument sales 0 shoe stores 0 Candy stores -" •• __ o photography equip&�,+t sales (2) Service businesses, including, but not limited to: o watch and Jewelry repair - o beauty parlors _ o travel agencies f o locksmiths o banks and financial institutions o movie theazers (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Commercial recreation (5; Restaurants (6) Nurseries and garden supl ly halstores, provided that fertilizer of any type sl be sold and store d 1u packaged form only. (7) Public Utility offices -+ (8) Nholesale business offices with samples on the premises, but not to incluen general storage ; (9) Accessary structures and uses'necessary or customarily, incidental to tho above uses as permitted by the'Rancho, Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. (10) Permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241., _ ,t IF Page `ice '�`?� ' ::IS. -i?a. i ?i. r:... .� •. �„:�f f'VCV Cr'.„3 .,n �yr� i'`��y''3 r+`''q °. ,'_.,y }y- u�lJWn� •,.Yd �.{Y ) . 4 -'0 �r r b. Uses permitted subject to specific approval of Conditional r Use Permits" r .z (i) .`AOtmal care facilities, not iocluding'kenneli .y yx �A (2) Peking lots" and parking buli'dingi (3) 'Automobile service stations" and car rashes S (4) Aut6mobile sates end service � •(5) Eledric dist7lbutlon switch stations, ,r5 (6) Commnication equipment buildings °A (7) Public utility booster stations (8) Co>mercial recreation (9) Accessory structures and uses necessary,cr customarily .' incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use permit and the zoning ord%anca of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (10) Conditionally permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. I.T v. d' ,4 Y `! • •r..�r ����i �Lia I A 159 .�_ -. CTTY COWICI4CRDIMIINCE�NO: VCPA 87 -03 " „a December 16, 1987,,, Page 4 3. Regional- Relited Land uses a. Tho foliowirng general categories of uses shall be pervltted: y (1) Ratail'ouiiness, including but not limited to:" o ;' departrnt stores o 'furniture stores 0 - autenobile sales a pet stores o ; motorcycle sales and service o bame improvement center o ` hardware stores S o grocery stores o clothing stores o meat markets or delicatessens (2) Service business, including but not limited to: o banks, financial institutions o automobile repair o blueprtnting and photostating o cleaning and pressing business o laundries o locksmiths a mortuaries o mechanical auto wash o plumbing supply o movie theaters o photographic supplies or studios o equipment rental (3) Administrative and professional offices (4) Restaurants (5) Commercial (6) Automobile service facilities (7) Nurseries and garden supply stores, provided that fertilizer of any type tie stored and sold in packaged form only (8) Public utility officesi, 4 f J A 159 .�_ -. `f'—, CIMCMKILMIMAKE WO VCPA-8743 December•'46 1987 Page 5 s, and motels ,,V1 (101; Self - service laundry and self-ser.vice.'dry cleaning facilities - Accessory uses- necessary 0 (11Accesio'r'-itructures.s�d' 'r.6stoi6rny inc d*nt<o-,thv,,abdve Uses as permitted by-tha,Rancho ;Cucamonga Zoning ordinance (12)-Permitted Comminity, Facilities listed on Page,241. c. Uses permitted subject to a Conditional Use Peiiit: (1) Animal• care facilities (2) Public W.1ity booster stations (3) Parking lots and parking buildings (4) Public Utility "change and substations (5) Public buildings (6) Accessory structures and uses necessary or custorArtly incidental to the above uses as specifically provided for by the use permit (7) Conditional permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. �I ni VCPA87-03"'" i%fj<"` December Page `6' % F D. CCR"ITY FAC1L1r&-&S'— section of the Victoria;Community, Plan, is', 1h ly brcommunityi support-`uses.&ndzthose.'�, ... ties' a '4mmu"' a�ovl"if FRI. P a, found to be:coW&tit-le with.the basic &ddI on - uses wh h ar Perm ti al' ses I ' iC ttted u �Y,�thelSlfi PI an- Ravi Procesz procedure'o,, 3 1. Uses pernitfed-.;�-'The,follodng.uses"sh&ll be permitted within Residential and Commercial Land Use areas In VI&Zorfa: i-k a. Smail,Family"Day rare in the home, providing ciri,for six (6) or'less persons. b. Public Park and Playgro%dd c. General Open Space uses. d. Accessory, StrUCt4;*= and uses necessary or customarily—' incidental to the above is provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 2. Conditionally Permitted Uses - The following uses shall be permitted within Residential or Comercial Land Use areas in Victoria subject to the Conditional Use Permit process: a. Church b. Club, lodge, fraternity and sorority c. Convalescent center d. Public facility e. Large Family Day Dare in the home, providing care for 7 persons. f. Child Care center4; g. Fire and police station h. Outdour recreation I. Schools, private and parochial J. Utility or service facility CITY-'C Ic' I E. Wilk 7-031, 21 D p saber 16", 987 C. The Amendment:87-03 to'the Victoria Planned Camunity shall apply o, arty -and all applications for Comnfty Facilities for which'- complete applications were'filed with the City after December 1, 1987., I i W 01, 1 'A W�' .0 =- _ •,pay __y.�;..:- .r- �.?i•�- .. -t._ - �. - ...� .S e:.^? "K -° DRAPr FOR DISCUSSiON PURP(", - • •• Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the City is only requiring t them to pay 112 fee, not undergrounding since the utilities are on the other side of the easement. If undergrounding 1s to be done, then the condition would be modified accordingly. Commissioner Emerick stated he supports undergrounding along Arrow Route. c' Russell Maguire, City Engineer, stated that the fees cannot be r transferred and only be used for this lot. _ Commissioner Emerick moved to approve the resolution with the deletion of 18 of the Engineering Condition, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY •••••• DRA.FTed ZR DISCUSSION PURPr -7 --- - _= P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87- 03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKONGA - A proposal to amend the Victoria Comunity Plan text to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain Plannin Commission Keating - 26 - 9 9 November 25, 1987 Y. DRAFT FOR DiSCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY community facilities as specified in the Comercial Standards and Community Facilities sections of the Victoria Community Plan. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman MCNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Stephen Ford, representing the William Lyon Company, referenced Section 2, Paragraph 2, to make this Conditional Use Permit applicable to all applications 'after' December 1, 1987 instead of 'prior to" December 1, 1987. t _ Mr. Carmen Angelo, 12774 Basil Street, questioned the Conditional Use for Victoria as he was concerred that this was for all the areas of Rancho Cucamonga and not ,lust Victoria. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there was a question whether Terra Vista also needed to be amended. Terra Vista already requires a Conditional Use Permit for oreschools. Mr. Angelo questioned how a public building is defined. Chairman WcNiel closed the public hearing. Brad Buller, City Planner, clarified a that we are not defining a public building but a community facility and it does include a - daycare facility. DRAF -r ,. FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ON I: Planning Commission Meeting - 27 - November 25, 1987 5 y- : DRAFT i Cl2 DISCUSSION Pt11RPOSIM ONLY Commissioner Chitiea moved to approve the resolution, Commissioner. Blakesley seconded the notion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, WNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -- carried_ :s Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87- ' 02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to provide procedures ,{ for requesting modification of rail service development standards and to authorize '►.odium wholesale storage and distribution' as a permitted use in Subarea 13 bounded by the I -15 Freeway an the east, Buffalo Avenue on the west, approximately 280' south of 8th Street on the north end approximately 1,335' north of 4th Street on the south. Alan Warren, Associate Planrwr, pres ,2nted the staff report. Chairman NcHiel opened the public hearing. Chairman NcNiel closed the public hearing. Planning Com iselom Meeting - 28 - November 25, 1987 mo a, �L — CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGAi STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Ergineer 8Y: Linda R. Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: order to Vacate 3 Portion of the Non - Vehicular Access Rights on Haven Avenue, Between Footnill Boulevard and Arrow Route RECCMNEHR%TIBN: It is recammended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of a portion of non - vehicular access rights as dedicated on Parcel Hap 6617. Background /Analysts At Sts November 18. 1987, meeting, -he City Council declared its intention to vacate a portion of the non - vehicular access rights as dedicated on Parcel Hap 6617, located on Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. OR 86 -14 was approved by the Planning Cortmission on August 27. 1986. A ,joint -use drive approach was approved, between Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 8250, a division of Pereel Map 6617. Vacation of the subject access rights will allow access to Parcels 2 and 3. Notices have been posted at the site and the public hearing date was published in the newspaper. When vacated, that portion of non - vehicular access will revert back to the adjacent properties. Respectfljl submitted. G R :LRB:sd /G6 + 4: m ..! .a RESOLUTION No. S 7 - G 8,3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY;O% SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING-TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON HAVEN AVENUE; BETWEEN.FOOTHILL COVULEVARD.AND ARROW RGUTE WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 87 =620, passed on November 18, 1987, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention,to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more partitilarly described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on December 16, 1987, in the Lions Park.Comounity'Center- Building, located at 9161 Base.Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time ar.d place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to.such vacation. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the avidence submitted that a portion of a ion- Vehicular Access Right an Haven Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as'shown on Map No.V -074 on file in the office of the Clerk-of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in -a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit 'A•, and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and excel obi ns{ any, for existing itilitias on record. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recor —od in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this rest uFfon and 1• shall thereupon take effect and be in force. . .r w J ' +Rq 167 '° d. S� v. x i 1 1 _ — �I- CIVIC CENTER DRIVE G YO•I6• 9' 'f W 4 W y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMfONGA ENGI14MMWG DAMON 1 ■ nmL. TM.9. V -074 1'r+ld CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ? STAFF REPORT ar. . �r DATE: December 16, 1987 1 b ` TO: 7tayor and' Nambgrs of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EgVlRO NENTAL A,qEyS�NT AND GENERAL PLAN rc ues o_a0en ANEM*W 87 -018 . Tan from DIM to Neighborhood'Cewerdal for 3.58 acres of land, located on the southwest corner of LaatU Court and Archibald Avenue - ApN:' 202- 151 -33. ENYIR ASSESWXNT AND DEYELO PNFNT DISTRICT ANENmENT ere o rcq�es e ,NC' ( Neighborhood P rw SOP' (Of fice /p ofessional) to located on the southwesst OrMr)offLomitaScourtrand Of Avenue - ApN: 202- 151 -33. [' AECO"DATIDM: Stiff recomc nc6e that the City Council continue a e e items as y 17. need in the beginning of this report to the meeting of February 17, 198A. If. BACIMROM: Nefrlck Properties is proper at the southwest corner of proposing to develop the Avenue as a mixed use Offfce/Nefghbor 000d1 � Court and ArclNbatd General Plan Amendment and acc �aerclal center. A Amendment is necessary to allow the Development District Protect proposal. The General PlanpAmenndment ande eve�opahis District Amendment was heard by the City Council at thou meeting Of October 21, 1987. At that time, the Council continued r me item to the meeting of December 16, 1987 with the direction that a Development Agreement be submitted as par' of the a'olicatlon for the purpose of providing more specfffc development con*rols on the site which would provide or maximum efficient site 'n accordsnce with sound planning principles, ut111zation of the /69 Y - �O A _Z - � J US K 4;7ip?i Fenn re�?tAFPRE?CR GM,87-041-AI)DAW-03 paw, 2 K. In the inte?fm, changed-architects 71— prOJ@ct. -.--"As c thii,j`d&te. -,'dAval opmonV.,'pl ans have, not.*�' We completed. exhibit'Of d;1 a a uchV, I- Val a A re t ore ISL, t" ite,464.0 thi0ef no IcantAndica*Wthat,they, aw.��TW!jpp t be thlir4fl eted PAtielopment" PI on$- Uri 11 t 4e It StaWwould r9gAiminUthit" this item 6j, continued I r 17, 1988 public Nlari Resp fully subn�!,tteds 40 647le z ra stale City wlanner es*.DC:ko gg: fln' /70 1 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Deceaber 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: pussell H. Mlaguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH'ANNEXATION, 00. 40 FOR TRACT IMO. 12873 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN LEWN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET TO 'LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CISTRICT NO. 1 ` IECONF.�IUION: _' ' It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 40 to Landscape Maintenahce District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution orderin the work in M connection with nexation No. 40 to Londscape Kaintanance Dpist:lct No. 1 for Tre -t No. 12873 located on we east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon i "vanue and Banyan Street. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the public hearing by sail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87-627 Rospectff s ttted, / r Attachments 17/ i RESOLUTION NO. O /,(,o g A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 40 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRI '•T NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 12873 w WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day or November, 1987, adrpt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -628 to order the therein described work in connection witlr Annexation No. 40 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -628 was duly and legally pubtished'in the time, form aid manner as re4ulred_by i law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolutr.,n of Intention on h file in the office of the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, after the ddoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Rasolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted in the tine, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -628, according to the names and addresses of such owners as it the appears the last mailing known and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and oral al.d docummentary. concerningcthe hjurisdictioe facts dino this eproceedd+ngcand concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived theretrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION h It Rancho Cucaoanga tatthespublicyinterestdand convenienceurequirestthe of annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -G28, be done arm made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s i hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved +hat thl assessments and rethod of assessment5n LFe—Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untTrTT e 60 percent of said tracts have peen occupied. r ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 40 for Tract No. 12873 SECTION 1. Authority for Hkoort This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California y (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). a: .; SECTION 2. General Daserlotlon S° ' This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions Into Landscape s Maintenance District Ho.l. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract No. 12873 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed the are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Coecifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Uivision. Reference is hereby mad: to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this re art to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkmy improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 40 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 40 Total Landscape Area 879,381 40,771 920,152 Na. of D. U. 8,977 302 9,279 Per Lot Annual Assessment 920920 15� $29.76 A Isess"nt shall 4� ty to each lot as enumerated In Section 6 attached 43SH'SMint dfsgram.— Where and tW', Involves fronts I the d*velcPN§rt covered b for,incl 1 - 90 along artarjAkI or 7 this Collector street - Is annexation Us an In the *""U"Ince district bu are designated,,.,, Homeowners association;. thasl. t wim be%!!"C' a 'In ssessmnts shall be reduced tsifted,by an active, Asses Dfa- SECTION S. A ram A f the Exhib t -iss diagram V-4: labeled gey 0 ,eror,0'*' i's'llent d within Y.thIs r*f is Attached to this text ' of,p6ts"report.-sr"Cl the dIagran is, hervby,,f njor report. and 70rated SECTION 6. &As esment ImPrOvements lots within the District District stifct a c are found to, be of gtn#ril 1;eneff Where there is more th&n_omd ttat'-&ss@smo ;t %hall'be 0#&l for eoct-te"&" land. the assessment no-dAvIlIng Unit pir at Or*pArcel Of as h f;nIt' each nuster of duelling Per-)lot or parcel. Proportional to the .9 units lOt'OV Parcel shall be s0fisablo The Cf actual Me V Council will hold a Public 11641-fn ssmients based upon the actual CO 9 in June. to deten"naL the Previous fiscal Year which aro t3 be reco sts Incurred by the OY the Landscape and Lightin City during tho vered through assesvmnts a. .9 Act Of 1972. rv4quf red SECTION 7. Order of Events I. city Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of Cif, Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution ngineer's Publfr� hearing date. UtfO of Intention 0 to Annex to District and sets 3, City council conducts Public hearing, considers all datemfnes to Annex to the District Or abandon the Proceedings. 4. Every year in may, she City testImOnY and Engineer files 4 report With the City Council. S. Every year in June the City Council approves, or codifies and approves the individual asteseents. r- 1.. qw- - Vy Properties and ImproymAteto be included within Annexation No: 40 to- Landscape Maintenance District_No.*I: - RUVAI.E_IKED AKA r TRACT u 51 IUMF • GMU kOVER Vj M-- 12873 302 BAnyan Street 14"700 Lemon Avenue' 26:07 1; 40.771 er JAI _�. R ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. -t t r ANNEXATION N0. 40 3 P i a , t� ,9 I I I • I I W •� •f qW � S 1 rla \ I V I CITY OF RANC:FO CUCANIOWA Y �i ENGINEERING DIVISION . ' VICINITY MAN MEN �i — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16. 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUWECT: ORDERING THE NOR:_ IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 30 FOR OR 87 -22 AND CUP 85 -37 (PCL. 3 OF PM 9487) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTEXPAC,E DISTRICT NO. 3 !t is recommended that City Council &%prove the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 30 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACY.6ROUND /AiALYSIS Attached #or C14 Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 10 to Landscape Maintenance b.ttrict No. 3 for DR 87 -22 aad CUP 05 -37 (pal. 3 of PIC 9487). The de�..opers of tho subject developments have been notified of the public hearing by moil. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 07 -523. Res p ell ubmttted, r I1NM Attachments IT7 RESOLUTION NO. � "44 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CbVMNGA ONDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR OR 87 -22 AND CUP 85 -37 (PCL 3 CF PM 9487) 18th day WHEREAS, Novbere 1987, Cadoptits ResolutionfoRancho ntention No. 87- 624nto a order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 10 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -624 was duly and legally published in the time, forty and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and Resolutionref�lntent on. headedp'Notice notice of the waspduly9andflegally posted in the tine, form, manner, location, rid number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and N`, -ETAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution :f Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property M7ropesad to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of ention No. 87 -624, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which sefd copies were duly sailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Councii having duly received considered evidence, oral anti documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the bane. °its to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Ccuncil hereby orders that Ure .ork, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -624, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Ei,gineer s ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessvnts and method of assessmen17iF- '{Fe-t:rgfneer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resc'ved that sold assessments shall not begin untTT after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. MH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 10 for DR 87 -22 ar,d CUP 8S -37 (pel 3 of VA 9487) SECTION 1, lutharity for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance Distract No. 3. -T)w City Council has determined tht areas to be anlntalned will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right- of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications .A The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. r Reference is hereby made to the subject development plan and the assessment dicgram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is a hcreby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or /by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October S. 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zcne will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated In the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. aZone 2 nnexed ito this Df trict. All her o ts or parcelstwithin Zane 2 will be assessed an net acre basis for the maintenance of Tandscaped medien islands onHaven Avenue from 4th Street•.to Dear Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard „and 4th Street from west to east City limit,.:Nfllfken Avenue mad Rochester Aveiwo,- from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven'-Aveeue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major dlvided' highways and some Parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area Ind Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Nom! di;�g Annexation No. 10 is as follows. Zone 1 Total estimated maintenance cost Assessment units Total cost - assessment unit. for year and month Zone 2 Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. Assessment units, acres Total cost # assessment Existing District $2,070 s2�70 S20.75 /year or :21.56 /mo. /lot Existing Annexation New District No. 10 TOM 0 0 0 380,527.00 13.44 380,540.44 unit for year and month 0 x S.30 • $ 0 /year 0 /mo. /acre __JM_.90_.T4 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and ♦a;• attached assessment diagram. SECTION S. Assessment D1UCM A cop .y of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit A•, by this re7erence the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. :q 1 SECTIPN 6. Assessment S' - - Improvements for the District are, food to be of Seneral benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acraage for each lot or, parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by in City during the pprevious fiscal year which ve to be recovered through assessments as- required 1 by the Landscape end Lighting Act of 1972. } S SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City council adopts Resolution, of Preliminary Approval of City Enginebr's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Ante: to District and ;ets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all test+mony land deterwiues to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, Me City Council 'ronducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • �1y � a .. . teu ;F =•Si {�. _ -• N- 4�. _,:y?,ti :xC'ia�;°.;...•'- i4* ;-., .✓�-an SRxS 39 ti Pr ..� operties and improvements to be - included within Annexation No. 10 •- - (Zone 2) to Landscsps Maintenance District Mo. 3: PROPERTIES m 2 IV (w P ACREAGE' Ti1CHi�2 a0 — 4 - - COP - o_S -37 84 (p':1 3 of PM 9487) Z3 4i' - ' IMPPOVEIEMi AREAS TO bE• AMMEIIED' I "r, AlMrafA7I0M IA). 1 - ' Area - °✓ 5 Ft• Haven Mama 0 " ? Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester kence 0 g' 6th Street 0 i ,m s - -. .err. •, _,.: r b ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. 10 III I I II O �IQ QI� Z Q jI Ndgap� sr. I 111 PARCEL 13 PARCE PARCEL A PARCEL 14 h I� � �r� sr.QEEr PARC I �l n CITY OF RANCHO CIICANIONGA ENGINEERING D[VISIOIV �m VICINITY MAP i j ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION NO. ZD J 14 A V �y �I A 1 2 A l . MW)W-G STAM .- t v b* CITY OF RANCHO CUCk*vIO,YCr\ ` f,UPA5 37 C ENGINEERING DIVISION A T �r °`I VICINITY MAP v t s' 0 1, - — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ■ STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1487 TO: City Council and City Kanager 1 FROM: R:tasell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUCJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CfMNCCTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 33 FOR OR 87 -22, DR 8642, CIF 8S -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 5487) TRACT NOS. 12873, 13279 end t3443 TO STREET LIGHTiNS KAIMMMANCE DISTRICT NJ. 1 RECDIBEIDATIOK: It is recommended that City Cotsv :ll approve them attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 33 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and appnwinq the Engineer's &-port. BACKGRDUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council app � proval is a resolution orring the work, in connection with Annexation Mo. 33 'to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for IIR 87 -22, DR 66 -42, CUP 0547 (Pcl 3 of PM 4487) Tract Nos. 12873, 13279 and 13443. The ddtvalopers of the subject developments have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also87pproves the Engineer's Rtrport tentatively approved by Resolution o. - 25. Ro'pectf submitted) J Attachments I RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 33 TO STREET LIGHTIWG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL EWJINEER'S REPORT FOR Dk 87 -22, DR 86 -42, CUP 85 -37 (eCL. 3 OF PM 9487), TRACT NOS. 12673, 13279 AND 1344b WHEREAS, the Cl "y Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of November, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -626 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 33 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -626 was duly and le ally published to the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Ctsrk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvemenuo , wasgqduly and legally as app In the theAffidravvitmofnPostingasaid. notice$,, on file inithe office.of No City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real p, .rerty proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of intention No. 87 -626, according to the names and addresses of such 64fters as the same appears on the last ailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, fora, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Msiling on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and dxueentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and Bald City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Ranchc Cucasuga That the public interest and convenience requires the annez•atlon to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -626, be done and made; end SECTI0U 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; anT- SECTION 3: The assessments and method at a3sessment in the Engineer's— are hereby approved. ®/ SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts nave Dean occupied. Imo CITY OF RANCHO CUCION)NGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No: 33 for OR 87 -22, DR 8642, CUP 8S -37 (pcl 3 of Pit 9487), Tract Hcs. 12873, 13279 and 13443 SECTION 1. Authorltr for RAOere This "port is in toap114nce with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Coda, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Naintananee District No. 1. Thi City Connell has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as mall as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Wort to be provfd2d for with the assesmmAts established by the district are: The furnishing of serviced and materiais for the ordlnagrhy and leprovtz arts onc�crostmtst(arterialfand notain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting Dfdtrict ATtas Map v::1ch 1s on file with the City Engineer. Improvament maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the Dfatrict and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Saociffcatfons by the edevelopers.s for lights have to the EngineeringnOfvli on +l Reference is hereby and as Loathe subjaettract cap or developetht plan and the astasaeht diagram for to exact locatir. of the street lighting arc-as. The plans And sppecllfcations fer street lighting iaprov9alnt on the individual developaen2 1s htrvby jade a part Of this report vo the same extent as if said plans and aaecfflcs were attached hereto. Detaibvi maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of 411 or any ,snrt of any iaprovement., providing for the illumination of the subj4net area. 0 i in M1` • SECTION 4. Estlmatcd Costs i Allbfaprovements for improvement k construction. n.w will bestreet Constructed by developers. Based on avallable data, it 1s estimated that maintensnee costs for Purposes I assessment will be as indicated below. TMse costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into dra cones. Zone 1 1s comprised of street I' improvements on War condominiums and apartmeAtsjoUrrooughoutitL City. Eachiddwellingyunit this tone rill be Massed as one in the Dts assessment uPIt for the operation of istrlat. z Zone 2 1s comprised of all industrial, comeercfal and institutional '1 throughout the City. It 4Acts has been detenvined that one acre of land In Industrial, ooaeaercial ad institutional areas derlvas the Sam benufit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting maintenance District No. 1 is shorn belcu; 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Ene�rov Cost LIMPSof Laups Limp Size* Lla 3 Annex ka Lary No 33' Total _ 9500L 47C 0 444 16,ODDL I6 1 477 0 22,000E 3 16 21 :500,0L 3 16 'Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Lamp Site Total Annual Laws Ala Motes Ma1nt. Cost ML 444 X S 8.93 X 12 = 47,579.04 9500' 477 X $10.16 X 12 220001. 16 X $12.08 X 12 58,155.84 3 2.319.36 ' X $13.84 X 12 27,500 16 X i1.z.31 X 12 498.24 2.939.52 c 'otal Annual Maint. Cost $111,492.00 2. Total Astessamnt Units: ' YTO ksess Units before this annexation 14,318 " r Assesses nt Units this annex per page 4 504 -1 Total Assessment Units 14,884 :ia 138' t� t r :e 3. Cost per Assessment Unit• Total Annual Maintenance Cost o. of n is n str e • SlII 492 • S7.49 /Year /unit Assesment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. AMEMMnt Dal m COpiea of the proposed Assessment Diagram are attached to this Annexation No. 33. Thesetdiagram art heerebycincorporated within the text of this repari. SECTION 6. AssassaL y all u11 svwith n the 0 strict and thatfassessment shalI be� :qualafor each unit. Khan units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTIGH 7. Order of Evanta I. City Council :,•opts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. Cfty Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City COufwtl conducts publfe hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every ltar In Nay, the City Engfnedr files a report with the City 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves. or modifies end approves the indlviduel assesannts. j8Q • a; 9 ? EMIDIT 'A' Properties and lapro ments to he included within Annexation No. 33 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: v Assess. project Acreage 2REEL 9500L 16,000L 22`000L 27.600L Zone 1 TR 12873 ___ 304 ___ ___ TR 13279 ___ 13 "'" '"- _ TR 1344 --- 144 --- -" ... 461 _ - M Zone 2 DR 87 -22 OR 86-42 CUP 85 -37 3 of PM 9487) 12.60 9.15 ,04 25 is 2 ... . -- " "" " -- 22.4 45 Total L06 eee MEN 11 0 ' ISo 1 1 6 :ui ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 013TRICT NO.* ANNEXATION 140. 33 q %.w r. Q� 3 Im � e Q VIII I I 14 b PARCEL 13 PARC CTTY OF RANCHO C'UCAMONGA COUIl:T7f OF BAN MNASDINO N P4J a,• I I PARCEL 15 I I � I PARCEL A ryl I PARCEL J4 �I e Q VIII I I 14 b PARCEL 13 PARC CTTY OF RANCHO C'UCAMONGA COUIl:T7f OF BAN MNASDINO N P4J I L .. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 33 r, l o2o3 o4 , ... ia1K �.IK �TIK �uK I.K Jk n .O 30 O n i A � � � • �• t i INK � O IDW � ,wK S 1 1 39 i .ue ' i 6 . ✓K• I 1 1 I 1 �1 TI zl I I I I I I I t F77f)aL lM&9VA110• it t.'it m�ti' CI TY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA _. COUNTY 08 BAN WN..O a B'PA'U OF CALiF UU w T ` l�l 51 TE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING !MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..* ANNEXATION NO. 33 51TE CITY 01 RMC80 CUCmONOA COUNTY Ot "N BS1 mwnio STATIj O! CALU'p1tNIA 21 E 1 ■ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE O STRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION 140. 33 W C1TY OF NAN OCH CUCAIIONOA Y COUNTY 079' UN IMNAMSO i STATE OF CA'LMRNIA, N o '1 : Y c C1TY OF NAN OCH CUCAIIONOA Y COUNTY 079' UN IMNAMSO i STATE OF CA'LMRNIA, N o '1 : Y '. - q , [1 • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 Y^ ANNEXATION N0, 33 CT['Y Ole UNORO 070 -WONGA COUNTY 08 aw mulm mo STAT& 01' CALII�)1tInA "--- 1 r •', 'O. 4a r< I 0 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDER!= THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 24 FOR TRACT WJ. 1287,3 L- IVATZO ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN BETWEEN LEMON A'iEWUE ANO 9)ur .w. STREET TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution oMering the work in connection with Annexation No. 24 to Street Lighting M,asntonance District No. 2 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 24 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 12873 located on the east side of Haven between Lemon Avenue and 9anyan Street. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the public hearing by oil]. The attached resolution also app ove627the Engineer's report tentatively approved by Resolution No. Res? !V.1 su itted, r r Attaehnents u Iell 11 RESOLUTION N0. 97-C -9'7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH AMEKATION NO. 24 To STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 12873 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the orrda,dtheothereinn described worktin Its connectionowith No. 07-628 24 to to Street Lighting Matnterance otstre:t No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -623 vas duly and legally published in the time, form and winner as tred by file n by the A?fldavit of Publication of said Resolution of Inen WY.tRM, after the a�option thereof, notice of the passage of said Resol. on of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, fo-a, winner, location, and number as required by lax, as pears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of Napgo City Clerk; and WHEI:W, after the adopCtion thereof, notices of the adoption of its Resolution of Intention were dOly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described to said Resolutim of Intention No. 87 -628, according to the naxs and addresses of such owners es the same appears on the last wailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City mannercas repirred bywlaw,� asiafpeirs from thelAffidavitiof the Hailt gtime, anofilesln the office of the City Clark; and WHEFTAS, said City Council tavinq duly received concidered evidence, oral and concerning the necessity 'ur'sdiction benefits to ho and derived thorefrcm and said City Council having flow acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said CitY Council hereby orders that tho wort, as set forth and described in sail Resolution of Intention No. 87 -628, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; an3-- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report ar: hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments $hail not begin until after 60 pen :ent of said trade Fare been occupied. 198 6a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Engineer's teport for Street Lighting MainUnance District No. 2 Annexation No. 24 for Tract No. 12873 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This Chapter I. Division115 ocompliance he Streets the d Article 3, California (Landscapipg and Lighting Act of W721. SECTION 2. General Descrotion StroetiLighting N4intanancelDistrit Nona2.alThe City Councilthasne determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots wiWt said developments as yell as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinar and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street 11 t 5troats)asashown�on;therLighting DistrictdAltas Mapcwhi hits on file with the City Engineer. Ieprovement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Soecfflcatlons The lans and by the developers .acThefPlansoandistreet lights aragasastipulated inrthe Elag approval lf eelera aathettrngnerioDivon. Rcrencishby d toe sublctact map or development plan and the assessment ofagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and sppccffications for street lighting improvement on the individual dev2lopaant is hereby made a part Of this report to the same extent as It said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or re em placent of all or any pa.t of any iaproveaxnt, providing for the illmination of the S0Ject area. ta4 — `J • SECTION 4. Estimated Costs 110 costs rill be Incurred for street lighting Improvement construction. All improvements rill be constructed by developers. d ase on available dots, It is estimated that maintenance costs for assist B Base purposes will be as irdfcated below. These costs are estimatad only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting 14fatenance District No- 2 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements an Wor streets for residential improvements (single fL*jily, multi - frilly, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the Ofstrfct. pp Zone 2 is Comprised of all industrial, co► ,mrclal and institutional landeinslnumstrlalt commercial has been derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting glintenance District No. 2 is shown balomc: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance rnd Energy Cost: No. of Lanes e Lops Annex La�Stze VTD New Lamp Vo. Y4 Total S800L 1,215 46 9500L 4 1,261 - -- 16.WM .._ 4 22,OOOL --- 27.500L - -- 'High Pressure Socfum Vapor Total Lamm Size Leaps pate No's Total Annual glint. Cost 5800!. 1,261 X S 8.93 X 12 • 9500L 4 $135,128.76 X $10.16 X 12 X 512.08 X 12 . 16.0001L. 487.68 0 _ -_ 27,500 X $13. 94 X 12 0 - -" $15.31 X 12 • 0 Total Annual Mafnt. Cost $136,104.12 2. TcUI Assessment Units: VTO Assess Units before this annexation • 4,347 ® Assessment ?. Units this annex per page 4 - 304 w Total Assess►;.nt Units 4,051 Tv - 1200 - ,,. a 1 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Totai Annual Naintanance Cost o.o n n Ulstrict $136� • 329.26 /year /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained In Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram reportpand labeledp Street lightinng Ka/ntennaanmceaDistricthNo. 2 ". rts Annexation No. 24. These diagram are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Ieprovemants for the District are found to be of yaneral benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units par net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. �I • VailBIT 'A' Properties and I prorewents to be Included within Annexation No. 24 to Street bighting Nalntena" District f.: Assess. Project Acreese - nTr— S3ox 9300L 16.000L 22.000L 271SOOL Zone 1 TR 12873 -__ 30 46 _._ ___ ___ ___ M: Zone 2 i. 1 P L + p.�.'tT' � �i .H W W W -4- I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 2 4 A e kp s r _7 sy - c .p CITY OF RANC$0 CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF 8AN BM"DINO STATE OF CALtpOjuj A lv � T _- � c b" b r EJ — MY OF 1UNCHO CVCAAMOh'GA � .. STAFF RE?OPT ' DATE: Decesber 16, 1957 TO: CIV Count} am City Manager FX!: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, J,mior Engineering Aide SVUECT: ORDERING THE YORK lx CORRECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 FOR TRACE NOS. 13279 AND 13443 (VICTORIA) TO STREET LIGHTING !1 MAINTENANCE DISTAICT NO. 3 PEC01NEWATIOM: It is recownded that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection Yith Annexation Nu. 6 to Strrit Lighting Maintenance Gistrict No. 3 and a,proving the Ergineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALTSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting rrintenance District No. 3 for Tract Nos. 13279 and 13413 (victoria). The developar of the subJeet tracts has been notified of thn ublic hearing by isstl. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -629. Res, f s fitted, IOW:S . Attachaents _ .6 trip t i k.� RESOLUTION NO. 0 7' L k A RUILUTINM OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON" ORDERING THE WOW IN CONNECTION WITH AMEl0:TION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13279 AND 13443 (VICTORIA) I' AEAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamm9a did on the 18th day of Povember, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention Ile. 87 -630 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Mfatntenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -630 was duly and legally published in th3 tire, fors yid manner as regired by law, shewn by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Re0lution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally ported in the tire, form, manner, location, and number as requfrtd by law, as d pears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices Of the adoption of the Resolation of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property • proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -63C according to the news and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last safling sl, as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaec:Iga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, fore, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office Of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and docuawntary, eorcerning the Surtsdlction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of mo Rancho Cucanga At the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, rem set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. B7 -6306 be done and Made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a-F-r— SECTICN 3: The assessrnts and method of assessment in the Ehglneer's —l%por are hereby approved. SEMON <: 'he assessments shall not begin until after f,0 percent ® of said trac s eve bean occupied. SOS - -4 CITY W RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engyineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintsnarce District No. 3 (victorf4l Annexation No. 6 for Tract Nos. 13279 and 13443 SECTION 1. Authority for Reoort This report is in caepllam.e with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Nigtways Code, State of California (Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Oeserlotion Street izLightingo141fntenancelDistrf t Noex3a11 The City Council developments into determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developentt as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Wart to be prorfdad for 00 districict are: the Assesswnts established by the The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Nap which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Soetifications by conditions theedeveloperpps. specifications Pl ns�and street lights are ashave stipulatedreinathe of a Referenced Isebsnlytmade to the subject tract Omap or, developwnt plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting arcs. The plans and specfffcations for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part Of this report to the same extent as If said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district nclude: the of all Or ec part any Improvementrovdifor the mintionof the subject area. • ao(n r� SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. Ail tsprovements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it :s estimated that maintenance costs for assesseant purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 has bean demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light Improvements an major streets for resfdentlai improvements (single tautly, multi •family. condominiums and apartments) throughout the City, Each swelling unit In this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional proiects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. Tha estimated total cost for Lighting Mintenance District No. 3 is shom belom: 1. S.C.E. Mintrnance and Eneray Cost: No. of Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 6 Total 58DOL 7S8 112 870 95DOL 6 76 82 16,0001. - -- ... ... 22,OOOL -.. _.. .._ 27.500L 'Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps We Ho's Mint. Cost 5800L 870 X f 8.93 X 12 S 93,229.20 9500L 82 X $10.16 X 12 9,997.44 16,0001. - -- X $12.08 X 12 • 0 22,0001. - -- X $13.84 X 12 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Mint. Cost • $103,226.64 2. total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 2,257 t_, ® Assessment Units this annex per page 4 157 kTotal Assessment Units 2,414 207 - i�. t 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost - $103 226.64 , 542.76 /year /unit of 051ts in his Ri— 9,514' -I Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained to Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3% Annexation No. 6. 7aase diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessan .c Improvements for the District are found to be of general borefit to all units within the District and ti13t assessment shall be equal for each unit When units are based on acreage, 4assssment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1 City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and • sets public hearing date. 3 City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year to Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. a • EVOIT •A• Properties and feprovewnts to be Included within Annexation No, 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 3: Assess. Project Aeneas — !g3CDl 9500. 16.DODL 22,�D22L 27.500L r Y Zone l S TR13279 .__ 13 73 76 .__ ___ .__ TR13113 -_- 144 39 _.. 157 112 76 _ W Zone 2 ,K ii aaa ,C: 209 _ .`. C ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC. -3 ANNEXATION NO. b CITE ^D RANCHO CUCAMONGA A ys "� COUNTY Ole 8AN BERNABIIII 10 " STATE 0! CALIFORNIA ■ t• 5J — C141 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "ATE: Oacaeber 16, 1987 DQ 19r TO: City Council and City Managar FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta. Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERIN3 THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 6 FOR OR 87 -22, DR 86 -42 AND CUP 83 -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 9487) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTEMARCE DISTRICT NO. 6 RECONIENDATIOK: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work to connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District go. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Mo. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for DR 87 -22, DR 86 -42 and CUP 85 -37 (Pcl 3 of PM 9481). The developers of the subject dove opments have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attache< resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively rpproved by 11asolution No. 87 -631. Respectful ubmitted, ��JJ � RMK:JA:sd Attachments 211. wa� xr V7 Ul RESOLUTION NO. P-(- K 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGVTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING COP 85'37 (PCLN3 OFSPh REPORT 87'FOR CR 87 -22, OR WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of November, 1987, adop' its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -632 to order the therein described work :n connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -632 was duly and legally put,11004. in the time, fora and manner ns required by law, shown by the Affidarit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City 11trk; and WHEREAS, after the adc .t .)n thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed - Motica of Improvement', was duly and legally and number as posted pearsi from them Affidavit ofnPoitIngasaid, notice$. on file in the office,ofs the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adop'ion thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all Persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements describeC 1n said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -632, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the sane appears an the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, Ural and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for Live contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdictioe to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuc —g- that t;* public interest and convenience requires the tion to District and as set forth andfdehcribed work, Inand saidsaid 0. Resolution Intention No. 87 -632, be done and made; and SECfiom 2: The Report filed by the Eng;neer is hereby finally approved; anTl -- SEC1'ION 3: The assessments and method of atsessmeat in the Engineer's 4WE are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin umtil after 60 percent of said tracts Have been occupied. 213 CITY (1P RANCHO COCMkNbiA ! Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 6 for CR 87 -22, OR 86.12 and CUP 85 -37 (pct 3 of PM 9487) SECTION 1. Authoritoa_t Chapter 1report sionlIS of the Streetr FiqulreseCode.fStatecof 4, anted Calffornla (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).s 912 ), SECTION 2. Ooneral Oeserfotfon This i &17 new vncitnw Stn tLightng KainenanceDiii No. 6. City Council determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all iOU wfthfa said developnts w as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provldod for with the assessments established by th3 district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and U sual maoenance, operating and servicing of street lil1ggqhhht sttreets)- as sShown otnyrthe Lighting Ofstric giawpcwhicheis considered with of general bene/ trto sninmthetDistrictsand all arc cost shall be Mlssad on a per uhst basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Soeefficaq The plans AM specifications for street "Oting have been prepared by the developers. Tho plans and street lfr..ts are as stipilated In t1.e Engineering Division. on. for ference development hby madeatoathe subject the sap or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street l,0ting areas. The plan.: and s ecfflcatfons for street HV%ting faprovem-i: on the individual development 1: hereby made a part Of this repor• to the saw extent as if 3a plans and specifies re attached hereto, were Detailed meadaor laenlafr trt IIclude: therepair,removl reppcmet ofilo aiypa of SPY improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. . • 2Ry SECTION 4. Estfmxted'Costg No costs will be incurred for street lighting 1provernt construction. All ieproveeents will oe constructed by developers. Based on available data, it 1s estimated that maintenance costs for assessment acttuualeassessmentsswilli a based oe actual These cost d&ca estimated only, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. tong 1 is comprised of street light ieprovteents an major streets for residential Improvements (single family. e:ultl- family, condominium rid apartatnts) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional pralects throughout the City. It has been detarained that one &ere of land in Industrial, conercial and institutional areas derives the saw benefit as two assessment Wits in ---VW 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: S.C.E. Matntenance and Eneray Cost: o. of Lamps L� N • La Size* 1TD o. 6 Total SBOOL 35 6 41 9500L 2 _.- 2 16,OOOL --- 27.r.,03L .._ ... --- *High pressure Sodiam Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Laws Rate Mb's Mint. Cost SBOOL 41 X S 8.93 X 12 $4,393.56 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 243.84 16,0001. --- X $12.08 X 12 0 22,0001. X $13.84 X 12 0 -__ 27,500 X $15.31 X 12 • 0 Total Annual Mint. Cost • $4,637.40 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 215.18 Assessment Units this annex per p39e 4 • 45 Total Assessment Unitt ='.18 t n M I 1 216 — 0 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Neintenanco Cost - 14 63740 , f17.82,'year /unit —Wig No. o n s o e r CC ° Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Disarm Copies of the proprted AssessswMt Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled °Screet Lighting Maintenance District No. 60, Annexation No. 6. These diagram are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvem:nts for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Wsolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. S 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every yecr in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 216 — 0 EVIBIT •A' Properties and lsproratints to be included within Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. Prt Kt kngeyg -Unite 5800E 9500E 16.000E 22Lf100L, 27,500L Zone 1 z= Zone 2 t: OR 87 -22 12.6 25 DR 86-42 9.15 18 %- CUPt 85 -37 2 1 .84 h N 9437) r' 2- 259 .59 45 i 6 ... ... - -- ... a a y S ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET I.IONTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 40 ANNEXATION NO. (o JI Jy ott�lolo l . o 'o �N 41r 4lr 4tY iyr 1�Y i l mr w ♦� ®. a trr I © 1A4 •{, nr w ® wt 1 Y ' Iwr i I A It 1114 Ij I 1 •IIr o IVr i 1 1 � � I 1 1 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 ® 1 >.r 1 . L VArr MWY L L �aacv�d'LI• •.- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BSRYiARDlNo BTATZ OF CALII�ORNIA \\\ N 0 ■ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . STREET L14HTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION NO. (o Oi 2 11 f•��, �Y MTY OF RANCHO MN cu CA1[ONf}A COUNTY OOF UWARDINO 9TATE OF CALMRNIA R] N -- ■ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 6 I�'B93P%�C9E Q3Q99' IPARCEL 15 I 1 O PARCEL I 0 A � QI PARCEL Jul Q I JL I � � vil 1 I d PARCEL 13 1 I PARCEL 8 I'i'��79E' d30f3' CnT OF UN:HO CIJCAYONGA COUKY 07 BAN ) AnNO =: 5 STATE OF CALII7OgN3A i S i , Y i PA 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "lip Na's, DATE: December 16, 1597 TO: City Council and City Kinager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Eminent Domain action to acquire piblic right -ofway for the Base Line Road Widening Project be,.ween Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue at the property located at 9549 Roberds Court (APH 202461 -09) for the construction of street improvements across the Base Line Road 'rontage of said property Staff recommends addptfOn of the attached Resolution of Necessity - dlrecting staff to proceed with condemnation of right- of -w;y for the construction of street improvements on Base Line Road across the properties located at 9549 Roberds Court (APN 202 - 161.09) in the City of Rancho Cuamonga. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS This Eminent Domain action to acquire public - ight- of-way for the Base Line Road Widening Street Improvement Project. The projects limits are from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue. The properly owners of the parcel in quef,tion, APH 202 - 161 -09 have been offered the exchange of right-of-WAY for improvements As of this date, negotiations to t :quire such right -of -ray continue without execution of a right -of -ray exchange or purchase agreavent. Although negotiations continue, it is felt necesssrj at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to prov_t4 ivith condemnation of such right -of -way for the proposed Base Line Road Widening Street Improvements. This is done to avoid further delays in constructing the improvements currently on hold cue to lack of right -of -way. Resp Mted, :pam L, �i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO COHDEIai A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the design, construction and street widening project for Base Line Road. Based upon the study conducted, it has been determined that the most r6ssonable and feasible alignment for the proposed street widening will Kquire the acquisition of a right -of -way across a portion or a residentially x�.ed parcel, awro particularly described herein; III) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code section. 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has wade an offer to the owners of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuations; (111) Pursuant to California Govern:ant Code section 40404, a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for ' extending and widening streets, as well as for the construction of drains, sewers and acqueducts; (iv) On December 16, 1987, this Council hold a duly noticed ' public hearing pursuant to the tarn of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to t'm adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, is is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth to the Recitals, Part A, of this Reso a on. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is required for a right -of -way or s on rain and street widening purposes is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit W and incorporated herein by this reference. X11 _ i s Resolution December 16, 1997 Page 2 SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council rr nub above- referenced ublic heain , including written staff reports, the City Cvnr:il specifically finds as follows: project; a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed b. The proposed project 1s planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution 1s necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Goverment Code Section 7267.2. SECTION is The City Council hereby declares its intentfon to acquire the proper ascribed in Section 2, above, by proceedings in emineno 'In. The City Attorney 1s ordered and directed to bring an action in the Sueprior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning and acquiring a rlyht -of -way for street purposes, and to do all things necessar --I to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes heroin described. Resolution. SECTION S: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ayor �2:23 0 _ t - cg-gt� rift i Mat lortlo M Yt 1. 11aa t. UcM.'"a aaut,A s. 49MUIC06 to IN oiy a 4aw twWap. is Mr din ntorad L t' 4aa A. of NM. PIP 4. Sa 12'"relft co" 4Cerda YoataN u • fallaw't Coftftdo6 It a Mla M 7c tiro lift of use UN Wt 193 mt can ' of w Soa nest tarot of 41 Q taafta awu 31o.a fM. don w 1n', h a w Swo if" of fowls Ctrl fa nom r tN Unt, of 4a SSrdorA" by dwd booed folmal I.S. Sift. to Soy 9f. 4M In. i official UkAnt Soft' gin 41W OC Sato IIN of Slid tedbto Covet. . (. 163.13 fat. ors f Iao Y w tan lido M w "'WHY 10 w of t I Lott / W S. 1!44 1 of ntd On30.1S oraa'W4 4MciattYl uftu N Sou an, w qn lift It uld ut 41 bet" An w t'ru 1110 of /W , 10 Wd; Stitt 111't 4304 in tiu lift of Wu It" Wd 163.93 - Mt. don r ton a w do." If M1Ido1M. v, To t tt %As M a Wit a anntt twdt, ptu" Yin Sgnwft'. S410t Ifni. Stmt ltpa. SW% 1Mdodo1S. use �i Mrdowu, /nnM, dyrlol aft lrotliq dod all nnr tad Wulf w,witt f U 1, awafap Wit Into u'1:a+ lard 0na17' fw w Cly of Ianfe Cdowdatt 1M WON elm S1pitMt 11.100{ ISO, All 61aq W 110 Mhw wnlap Moat is "A. W dordt tf w wMemY 01rIHM N w Coeaaiv oM I$Pmt ootaruaet fir W Cly of flame ccTaaw If 1i1 W v Up small ta10aa o toddiaatf W, do nIng of 'Mdw le Cdoatnat' u4 If ftt tarcft N Wa a YM w"Ots,. w Cly Callan, onlM at no a:carMNadftt N StInn, $411 WM tnd arotnnla a be dial W w alt tb~ {:all N . lift Sir w SnMry. 0tee ' I o O Y e 0 r=. r EXI4t61i I A I -.1 �2.�9 w, r • — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh!ONm3A STAFF REPORT DATC: December 16. 1587 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russoll H. KAMM. City Engineer BY: Blanc N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer M ,0 S.. SUBJECT: Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing and passing upon objections or protests. If any, which may be raised by any pprpperty owner or other interested party regarding the 4atice of Public Hearing and Order to Construct that was posted on December 1, 1937, at 9549 Roberds Court to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 for the Base Line Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellmn Avenue. RECONENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the City Engineer, actin g9 as Superintendent of Streets, to p-oceed with the installation of Improvements at APN 202- 161 -09, If such Improvements have not bean installed 60 days after December 16, 1987, in accordance with Chapter 21 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the foreaLlon of an assessment district described as: APR 202- 161 -D9 That land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat record-! in Book 6 of Maps, Page 46, San Bernardino County Records as descr0c i as follows: Commencing at a point of the North line of Base Line Read 165 feet East of the Southwest corner of Lot 6; thence North W0.84 feet, Gore or less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deed recorded rebrvary 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence East along the South line of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East line of the westerly 10 acres of Lots 5 and 6, Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence Nest ^'onp the North tine of Base Line Road 160.93 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. E 'er 8arnardlno by deed recorded February 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; them:$ East along the South lira of said Robirds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East Ifne of the wester-ly 10 acres of Lots 5 and yy6. Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence Base LinenRO dl line the Worthillnelof BaseHLine Road 160.93 fait, mor4 or loss to the point of begirming. Upon hearing protests or ebfectlons, if any, at the public hearing, Council is reauestod to male a ruling and dfrecttvs to staff re-ardlm protests and dmrect the City Engineer, actin at the Supertnter� ant a? Street, to proceed with said rmpro voasnts, if such have not omen t a CCSR OECEMER 16, 1987 6 PAGE 2 rvi Background /Analysis On December 1, 1997, tit) attached 'Ilotica of Public Hearing and Order to Construct - was in front the a posted of property located at 9549 Roberds Court, identified by APN 202- 161 -09. This Notice war posted fn accordance with Chip ss ter 27 of the Improvent Act of 1911 and orders the installation of curbs, guttars. sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, base pavmeents, street pavoments, grading, clearing and 3;ubbing c and all other incidentals therewith. The Property miners are i;utruct:e4, that they are given sixty (6O) days from she oat' of Resolution adoption (0ecesber 16, ?987) to construct said improvements. After 60 days is up, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, will cause the fmprovements to be constructed and the property owror will be te l t7hascosts lcothescosts. ansasstsseentafo r willabe paid byfthe foormation sw an Assesent district which will lnelude APH 202 -161 -096 and are t' de de ribed as follows: - APN 202 -16 -09 That land situated in the State of California, Count' of ran Bernardino and described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, Clock 8, Cncu vngs HamestW Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded i:r gook 6 of laps, Page 46, San Cernardfno County Records described as follows: Coaeencing et a point on tl;e North line of Bess Line Road 1GS feet East Of the Southwest corner of Lot 6; thence llarth 330.84 east, more of less, to the South Tire of Roberds Court as deeded to the County e.- San 'er 8arnardlno by deed recorded February 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; them:$ East along the South lira of said Robirds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East Ifne of the wester-ly 10 acres of Lots 5 and yy6. Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence Base LinenRO dl line the Worthillnelof BaseHLine Road 160.93 fait, mor4 or loss to the point of begirming. Upon hearing protests or ebfectlons, if any, at the public hearing, Council is reauestod to male a ruling and dfrecttvs to staff re-ardlm protests and dmrect the City Engineer, actin at the Supertnter� ant a? Street, to proceed with said rmpro voasnts, if such have not omen t a r C 1 CCCt DECEMBER 16,-107 PAGE 3 constructed within sixty MY days, and to further order the formation of an assessment district which wit include the before mentioned parcels to Pay for said imprr.• =ants, Respectfully submitted, RH1:B16:pr Attachments 2 X7 _ 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND OVER TO CONSTRUCT Pursuant to Sections S875 of the California Code for Streets and Highways entitled 'Duty to Construct': 'The owners of lots or portions of tots fronting on any public street or place when that street or place has been improved by the construction of sidewalks or curbs Mr a total frontage of mole than fifty Percent (SOS) an cae side of such street or place in aqy block, > or whore a petition s19ned by the owners of more than sixty percent (60t) of the front footage of any part of an unimproved portion or portions of a block has been filed with the City Clerk requesting the installation of such improvements in front of said part, or whenever the legislative body Of the City upon its own nation; orders the installation of such improvements in front of said part, shall have the duty of constructing or causing construction of sidewalks or curbs in front of their properties upon notice so to do by the superintendent of streets'. • On December 16, 1907, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the legislative body for the City, will meet to adopt is Resolution ordering the construction of curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base Pavements, grcding, clearing and grubbing and all other Incidentals involved therewith. Notice to Construct Pursuant to Section 5876 of the California Cedes for Streets and Hfghwlys, the City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucaaongs under the direction of the City Council for thn City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all parties holding legal possession of that property located at 9519 Robords Court, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 202- 161 -09 bring described as follows: That land situated in the Stato of California, County of San Bernardino, and is described as follows: y That portion of Lot S. Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in • Book 6 of Naps. Page 46, San Bernardino County Records desxibed as follows: Commencing at a Po19t on the North line of Baae Line Road 165 feet E,.st Of the Southwest comer of Lot 6; thence North 3Oo.84 feet, Nora or less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deed Recorded February 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence fast along the South line of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East line of the wosterly 10 acres of Lots 5 and 6. Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence Nest along the North line of Base Line Road 160.91 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. To construct or to cause to construct cubs, gutters, drive aproaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals therewith. Such workings shall conform to 'Standard Drawings' for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1984 Edition with supplements through 1987. All plans and construction workings subject to review and permit by the Engineering Division of the Community Development Department for the City Of Rancho Cucamonga. All such workings shall commence immediately upon enactment of 'Order to Construct' and, if not commenced within 60 days thereafter, the City Engineer acting as the superintendent of streets shall cause such construction to be done and the cost thereof shall be a lien urea the property. • NOtic's of Public Hearing Pursuant to Section 5878.1 Of the California Codes for Streets and Highways, YOU are hereby notified of a plealic hearing to be held at the Lions Park CcMMAurtlty Center, by the City Council for the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, to hear and pass upon protasis or objections to this Hotfse to Construct. Such meeting'will begin at the hour of 7 :30 p.m. on the 16th day of December, 1987. The Lions Park Coaounity Center is located at 9161 Base Lire Road, Rancho Cucamongs, California. The decisions of the City Council on all protest: and objections shall be final and conclusive. Anyune having any Questions or concerns on this issue is enccuraged to contact the Cliv of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division, Design Section, at 969 -1862 or visit the office at 9330 Base Line Read, Suita 203, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Anyone wishing to coament on this issue is encouraged to attend ti the public hearing. a Mr, 0 5 d. X31 + RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO BLIC 1NpROVEENTSOATE95 9 ROBERDSCCOUAT. APH 2022-- 161 -09 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THIU 5880 MORE COMHONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROYEMENT ACT OF 1911 i' WHEREAS, on Oecsmber 1. 1987, the City Engineer acting g9 under authority of the looccation alFormaal Notice to Construct aPublichad ' subject Improvemants. - WHEREAS, on this data December 16, 1987, the City Council of 0tis aOeher an mar interested pare to the r rtoConstructt; and upn hearing fro0y in the common interest of public health, safety ail objections, resolves and welfare for the City of Rancho C4,:wnypa that public improvement be and otherwise issues an ' made at 959 Roberds Court and herab, rescives "Order to Construct' street frontage Improvements consltting of parking gradings, drive sane pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway approaches and street lights and t.l incidentals thereto in confareance 'Stendard the City of Rancho Cueamonga, 1984 Edition to the Drawings" of with supplements through 1987, with all plans ard construction work being of the Community • Division e oartmenteofithe City ofEngineering Cucamonga- Oevopement Dk All work shill commence within sixty (60) days of the execution of this All resolution and if not commenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, acting as construction to be made, and Superintendent of Streets, shall cause such to the statutes of the California Codes for Street 8 in pursuance Highways shall proceed with actions to assess the cost: therefore as tax lien upon that real property described as: ADN 202- 161 -09 That land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: That ofrRanchofCucamonga. as plat recordedsinaH oks6coftMapi,iPag e City per 46, San Bernardino County Records described as follows: d. X31 a M, r _- RESOLUTION PAGE 2 Commencing at a point on the North line of Base Line Roa of the Southwest corner of Lot 6; thence North 300.84 it to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the Coun Bernardino by deed recorded February 13, 1931, in gook 6 official Records; thence East along the South line of $a 160.93 feet, more or less to the East lint of westerly 1 and 6. Block 8 of, said Cucwnga'Honestead Association; along the East line of said Lot 6; beiig also the North Road; thance Nest along tilt North line of Base Lint Road more or less to the point of beginning. 16S feet East • �:' :, mom or less. Line n,e l,ntr N ut 16 tort 16 Cr,raN Mott"' &"Orlin, b b City '.f 4,n, CYb"t,, n M' ,In .curt p 4,1 L N ttq. tell 11, L\ 4rrMr Co""' ,ttvl, lrtvlW Y Co.. t�vCllh IL • plot ,t b rrr l:r N ttu t'M lr1 ill ut. gon N tlr snarnt alru d tot /t brl l,rt>t 100.N lost, tnt, or w Itt, to b s„,% lift N 4Mr4 CRott os ,I.M try NL tot In. l,tauAr p brs tttwrl Itlrrr' 11. 1111. OffeNtl lrwtlt but bn at," b swr It, of oslt W,IO Cwt, ul•ls M4 a or 1m r b lost 11 W stW 11rtt/� >n bt„ of loot "Itimly to 01' 0 tort t W 4 llwt t d Ws IA Ut It f,Ir tltry b 4rt rift N r11 tot It INN osw b 1,rta 11 d 4r Lim stool tMern Wrt OM b Yrn IIr d ur lltt 1rt 110.17 M4 o,n or lost r b "in of ,tllwitl. to nn >+YL w to twM tt "non'" tarty. MtWI, 41x0 allnrttt. nntt n . ,tnn Milos, ttntt vs-+ . 4,t lnwro. lnCl f. tl,vn/ W PWIN W ,It ~ Irf4 ult ntr.+ln. sot rw,1W b11 Ldw r'StaYtR lnalq,' fw b ap N 4,n, Crlrr•ll List 111ttw dos tr,lssnY trstla 1M. All llw W nnvcttr I Jpp Wltn r T1w aal fwwt 1r b tall,wrlo 1111110 N b CO-PW%r Ill"I"•trR 1,lt fw b tip of 4a0M ORYreI,. 711 t , canto, 'WI tatsu Ia001,E011 Ina wttrr.L N 'Orb r Wsort' W, It W tsototttn dnla W stft IOndrr, b Cop toll Wr rtlal os b twwttbr,rt N ,t," Pali two sO- I antrrHSl b M attt W b cost brM yell r s lift we b pattrp. .-. r'dytt I C MEW." p p O rQ I .I e E 13 n i" E. DATE: December 16, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA51ONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Manager FROM: Nark Lorimer Sr. Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Mobilehome Rent Stabilization After more than ten months of intense negotiations between the City, the mobilehome park owners, and residents, it appears that an extension to the existing mobilehome rent stabilization accord will be presented to the City Council on Wednesday, December 16. At the time the City Council agenda packets will be prepared, negotiations were still continuing, and a final agrnement had not been reached. However, staff is confident that final concurrence by both the park owners and residents committees will be granted prior to December 16 so that the final accord may be drafted and presented to the City Council at your upcoming regular meeting. I will be contacting the City Council throughou. the week of December 14 and providing up-to- minute updates regarding the accord. Staff will be meeting with resident committees on Thursday. Daces @er 10 in order to discuss a final acceptance of the accord provisions which the par.; owners have recommended. Again, staff suspects that a final resolution will be made prior to the Deceaber 16 City Council meeting. Thr.nk you for your patience and understanding regarding this issue. The ultimate goal In resolving the mobilehome rent stabilization issue is to gain an.toal support for the accord by the City, the park owners, and the park residents. The sensitive nature of this issue warrants that we continue to address any problems or concerns which are presented, however so minimal or minor. Hopefully, a smooth resolution to this issue is forthcoming. FL :ba -- say z e 0 i DATE: TO. FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Decaaber 16, 1967 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Magaire, City Engineer Z � Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent North Side of Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to Rmnona Avenue RECOMMENDATION: It is rucomaended that the City Council a,prove a major maintenance protect for the parsing lane alung the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Ramona Avenue to Hellman Avenue. Said protect is to include curb and curb and gutter repair, grirding of the existing pavement and a pavement overlay graded for drainage. The protect is to be funded from unallocated funds. Background /Analysis In recent months, staff has received numerous complaints regarding the condition of the parking lane on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue. A number of these complaints have been registered by the owner of A 0 R Tire. Although a number of the problems are related to on -site maintenance, and therefore are the owner's responsibility, these problems are complicated by poor drainage and potholes within the parking lane of Foothill Boulevard. Since Foothill Boulevard is a state nigWAY and under the Jurisdiction of Caltrans, staff has been careful not to assure the responsibilities of this state agency. However, we have been working closely with the local Caltrans Maintenance Supervisor to the extent that the City has completed some marking of curbs and our maintenance section has provided support in the Perm of sweeping for debris cleanup ahead of Caltrans asphalt patching crews in the problem area. These efforts have been inadequate to cure the larger problem and staff is attempting to deal with Caltrans at a higher level because it has become apparent that the extent of work necessary to solve these problems could entail a significant protect. However, recent conversations have not been promising with respect to coaxing an acceptable protect out rf the State. CCSR DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 2 Ir, addition, it should be noted that the twe blocks to the west Gf Archibald Avenue are in similar condition. Although m,ot quite as ceteriorated as the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Architald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Archibald Avenue to Klusman Avenue and Klusman Avenue to Hellman Avenue, should also be considered for improvements if a project is to he undertaken. We have a nwTher of options: A. A Widening and IWroveeent Freject to the parkway and parking lane along the north side of Foothill Boulevard, as noted above, but only betweee ArciHbald Avenue and Ramona Avenue. It is estimated that tin oust of this project will be 585,000. - B. A Widening and improvement project to the parkwAy and parking lane along the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Ramona Avenue to Hellman Avenue. The estimated co•.'_ of this project including design, and construction of curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches and pavement Is 5250,0E+1. This estimate is based on a right- of -wAy exchange program and therefore does not include right -of- way acquisition costs. C. A major maintenance project to the parking lane alung the north side of Foothill Boulevard Ocon Ramona Avenue to Hallman Avenue. This project would include tvrb and curb and gutter repair, grinding of the existing pavement and a p4vement overlay graded for drainage. The total estimated cost including design and construction is $54,000 and is broken dawn as follows: - Archibald Ave.to Ramona Ave. $20,000.(0 . rchibald Ave. to Klusman Ave. 14,000.00 Klusman Ave. to Hellman Ave. 20.0m.0o 0. The last option would be to continue to solicit regular maintenance of the worst areas from Caltrans while continuing to request the State to fund a major maintenance project in the area. CUR DECEMBER 16. 1987 PAGE 3 ., It is the opinion of staff that options •A• and •B' would be too costly w at this time. Option "D• is unacceptable since it would not be. ;r immediately responsive to the needs of our citizens. option *CO would appear to be the most viable course of action due to cost and time limitations. it should be noted that option "C• is intended to be a maintenance project with an estimated life of two to five years. 'a However, it is anticipate! that sufficient now development and /or renovation will take place along Foothill Boulevard in the neat two to f five years to satisfactorily replace the parking lane work completed by this project with new improvements. e Respec submitted, ' � R1H:OBad� . a. 'Py v CITY OF RANCHD CLICMgNGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Natntanance District No. I No. DR 87 -22, OR 86-42. aCUPn85 -373(pcl for 3 of PM 9187), Tract Nos. 12873, 13279 and 1303 SECTION 1. ppAuthority far Report Chap2ers1.eOivisfon115 oof ithe SL ets and Hishtsc�,fStateeof 1. is Cal ifornfa (Landscaping and Lighting Act'of 972 ) . SECTION 2. General Desolation This MY Council has elected to annex all new eavolopmehhts into Street Lighving Naintenance District No. 1. The City Council has deterufned that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said devaloprents as wall as on the lots dlrxtly abutting the :t:--et lights. Work to be provided fo, with the assess. —_,h astablfshed by the district are: The furnishing of services and mcterfals for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street niggggihhhht Sttrreetss)assshownn onrthe Lighting DistrictdAltasaHapcwhichta On file with considered of the benefit rto all areasnin�thhe maintenance is cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans end Soeeffleations The plans and specifications for street lighting have been nrepared by conditions of the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the Engineering Division. on. Reference siherreeby madeatoathe Sub by the City or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact locattionmof the street lighting areas. The plans and sppecifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is heroby made a part of this report to the saae extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting ifstrfet include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or a,ry part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the sobJect area. C I - - �M SECTION 4..; EstimataM Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting loprovement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it,is.sstimatad that maintenance costs for assessment acttuualeassessaett$ indicated based an actualeco t data. estimated only, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of •treat light improvements on major streets for residential improvement sit, is family, multi- family, condominiutas and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional- Drojects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas dorives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting HaiManance District No. 1 is_. shown below: 1. S.C.E. Mint3nance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps aammpp s LYTD Annex law L Lase Size' o. 3 Total 5800L 444 0 44477 9500L 476 1 16,000L 16 0 16 22,D00L 3 0 3 27,500L 15 1 16 'High Pressure Sodium vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lanes Rau No's Maint. Cost 5800L 444 X $ 8.93 X 12 S 47,579.04 9500L 477 X $10.16 X 12 58,155.84 16,0001. 16 X $12.08 X 12 + 2,319.36 22,000L 3 X $13.84 X 12 498.24 27,500 16 X $15.31 X 12 :.939.52 Total Annual Haint. Cost $111,492.00 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 14,378 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 504 Total Assessment Units 14,884 _a z L t Urk: Total Arnuai f4tetenanc. Cost $111 492 AsSessuent, shalt -apply to each lot Or parcel As eAPI&tn#d in Se . c , tfon.fi. SECTION S. copies of vii pry osid- AAsiasmAnit Diagram grazz are'attacmd•to this 'Stunt report And labele'Stunt Lighting Maintenance Ojtefct, No,. a Annexation No, 33. These diagram lare bereby.fhcorperatod 14thin-the text Of this report. SEr-TION 6. Assissoint loprovments for the District are found to be Of general benefit to a, I units wfthf n the District and that asseisment Shall be tqjjI for a h "nit- WhOn units are based an acreage. 03$03=cnt vUl be 2 units per be not acre. SECTION 7. g!:Ler of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution Of Prelfainary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Int 'P sets public hearing date, �ntfon to annex bfstr,ct and 3. _-Ity COUICII conducts Public heartng, =stders all testimony and determines U fort a District or abandon the Proceedings. 4. Every yeor In FYY. the CftY U91MW files a report with the City Council. 6 Every -,ear in June, the City Council conducts a public hoaring and approves, or modifies and Apgroves the indivfdua Mrssments. "-Z 1 - --N 40MMV-0 n V EXHIBIT NAN Properties a"d iNPrOvOwnts to I,* included within Annexation no; 33 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. Project 4M&-S—" RUM SM- -95-0UL 22.0031. 27,5�0 L Zone 1 TR 128?3 TR 13279 --- '304 13 --- TR 13443 144 --- 461 ... ... Zone 2 OR 87-22 12.60 2s - -- OR 86-42 9.16 is ... CUP 65-37 .84 2 --- (I 3 of P ... --- M 9487) Total ay ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTE.jANCE DISTRACT NO.,t r AWD(ATION NO. 33 III N WI Q� i PARCEL PARCEL A PARCEL. 14 I N< .4l4 13 P4RCEL B 1, J If CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q COUNTY OF SAN BIRNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING (MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 AtINEXATION NO. 33 J,� •• Y^ CITY or RANCHO CUCAKONGA a \ COUNTY OF SAN EMARD. STATE 07' CALU?ORNIA N IE I i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3 ANNEXATION RO. 33 ``� , „ s6 v � 3 J 1.. 1 Foxnct WAEVuro• CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN SMARAINO &TATS OF CAW Pl" ._ w T s iTE a. !s NT 6. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 K04MTION No. 33 0isk%414, — CITY OFR!,NCHO CUCAXONOA c COUNTY OP SM BWjkRDjNo J STATTA OF CALIPORMA A N' I �lz 4; ,g 'sit IY ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT VANEXATION N0.33 Cif 031 RMCHO 4wUCAXON(;A U COU► OF &X ZMMMINO rATA OF c A N 2m I rl s `3 „^F LEMON - - AYENUE; ,NWY ART s al,cc� w.•• .... _ ININi� DI'JTRICT'M0.-Xr - RECOgFjDATION. _ 1t 1s recomawnded U.0. C114% C06ncil aDDrove' the atta hed resolution'--' Maintenancea0istrict No.. 2'and'e provfn9 thelEngineer's Repo t. Lighting. BACKG*MVIANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Yo..24'to Streat Lighting Maintenente' district No. 2 for Tract-Ne. 12873 locate3'on the east side of Navan between Lenon Avenun and Ba.1yan Stmet. The develolPpDor- of the subject. tract has been notified roves of the Engineer's Report teatstivoly approved by resolution ResoWtiOn No. 87 -627. ResD su fitted, :JA: Attachments kA NOZ = CITY OF RANCHO- CUCAMONG -k -, 'STAFF REPOR' = '� •� DATE: Decesbsr iG„ 1987` TO: City.CCfciell:tnd.Ct4r Menafrr` . FROM: Rujaell,N., PMipire,. City_ Engineer- Judy Acosu,,,Junior'Eng1'm,4 ing.Aida BY, OK RING'> TISE'+ 10R1; tMPCpNNEtt1! iNNITiIAlMEKATION_h0.24'FoR`' - SUBJECT: TeatT..un,--1 2873 .LOCATEO:og',.ME =EAct SIDE,, CF MAYT31 BETWUM'" LEMON - - AYENUE; ,NWY ART s al,cc� w.•• .... _ ININi� DI'JTRICT'M0.-Xr - RECOgFjDATION. _ 1t 1s recomawnded U.0. C114% C06ncil aDDrove' the atta hed resolution'--' Maintenancea0istrict No.. 2'and'e provfn9 thelEngineer's Repo t. Lighting. BACKG*MVIANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Yo..24'to Streat Lighting Maintenente' district No. 2 for Tract-Ne. 12873 locate3'on the east side of Navan between Lenon Avenun and Ba.1yan Stmet. The develolPpDor- of the subject. tract has been notified roves of the Engineer's Report teatstivoly approved by resolution ResoWtiOn No. 87 -627. ResD su fitted, :JA: Attachments pESOLIR1oN N0. 87- �7 A RESOLUTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCID > CUCAiIOMGA ORDERING THE YORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 2 ANN N0. 24 TO STREET Li6;ill�tG IWNTENA110E DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING TIIE FINAL ENGINEER's REPORT FOR TRACT NO. IZ87 r r Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the WEI I the City Y 18th day of November, 1981, adopt its connection of Intention No. 824 t to order the therein described work in connection sh Annexation Yo. en to ' ct NO.d in the flab, fors and Benner as Street Lighting Nelntenanca District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-528 was duly end legally W required by law, shown by t� Affidavit of publication of Bald Resolution Of iF Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and passage of said YHEajAS, after the adop'Notice ton thereof, notice of the Restetiontof Intention, headed maener location, aannd number as was rrequired and by law, arsfGromrk eeAffidavit of posting said notices, on file to the office of ag WHEREAS, after the aZtion the tofal7o persons fownin9� real oProPCr0 Resolution of Intention were he y Groposed to be assessed for the 1�rovexnes described in said such oners Cif/ Ithe staa�enallo. 87 626. the ccordingg to the wn tod the sCity f such owner ei and of Rancho Cucamonga, which said clsireoetheiAf�darltiofiKilling �onofreile in tanner as required by law , as appears the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council avingddctton facts in this nproceeding and oral and documentary, concerning deriveditherefrom andisaid City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuca ng& at the public interest and convenience and requires the hereby orders to that th District and the et rderinand described �innsaidiResolutiou Of l forth Intention No. 87 -628, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report ailed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved, an — SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's epor are he approved. ry P SECTION 4: The assessaents shall not begin until ter 60 percent SE of said tracts we been occupied. 1R8 ` CITY OF RANCHO CLUMCA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 21 for Tract No. 12873 SECTION I. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article a, Chapter i, Division IS of the-Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. Deneral Descrtptfon This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be mafntafned will have an effect upon all lots within said oevelopments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street iiiggghht irov nt on o streets (arterial an cer in ettreets)eassshownjonrthe Lighting DistrictdAitasAMapcwnfchtis on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and speciffeations for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans end street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or develoMent plan and the aysessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if ssid plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, prjvfding for the illumination of the subject ares. Mz ME s SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will bo incurred for street lighting i ro'vement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. eased on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment - purposes will be as indicated belov.- These costs are esttmrad only, -, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance Di•trfct No. 2 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is cosprised of'stremt light Improvements on Wor streets for residentfnl improvements (single family, multi- f4mily, condominlums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit_in this zone will be assessed as one assesssnt unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all Industrial, commercial and institutional erolects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre'of " .and In industrial. commercial and institutional areas derives the sa me benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lfghting Maintenance District No: 2 is - shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: - No. of Lamps Laws s Wor24 NTotLaj 4 Lamp Size* 5900L 1,215 46 _ 1,261 4 16,000L ..4 --„ , 22,000E 27.500E *High pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size LMS Rata No's Ya1nt. Cost 5800L 1,261 X $ 8.93 x 12 $135.128.76 ., -- X $10.16 X 12 487.68 166,000 E -4 X $12.08 X 12 - 0 22,000E _ .. ---. X $13.84 X 12 0 27.500` - -- X $15.31 X 12 • 0 Total Annual Plaint. Cost $136,104.12 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation • 4,347 Assessment Units this annex peg page 4 ,• 304 " Total Assessment Units 4,651; ; .a,-.- 5' 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: aka Total Anngal'Nafntenanct Cost • $13610 12 . $29.26 /year /unit o. 07 n in District Chi s, Asfassawnt shall apply to itch lot or parcel as explained to Sectie:i 6. SECTION S. Assessment Ofaoraw Copies of the,propossid Assessment Ciagrama''are attached -to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Naftwance District No. 2 *. Annexation No. 24. ,Those _diagram art- hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment P Impr„veaents for the District are farad to be of general benefit to all units within the Dictrfet and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mien units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per% i net acre. " SECTION 7. Order of Events - I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council abpts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to fere a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in itay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. S. Every year in kne. the City Council :onducts a public ;rearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Z-v VIM MU J EXHIBIT •A2 Pro partfes and japroVORents to be Included wfthin Annexation No., 24 to Street Lighting Nlirftnance District 2:- 1611 lS pro Kt Acre r r-MM 9500L' 16,000L 22,000L - 27,500L, F TR 12873 304 1,146 �Zofle W W W } L� ■ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION NO. 2 4 .m 15A 4 y' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO t I3 STATE OF CA&. RNIA si N e2 CITY OP 11ANCHO CUCAMONGA IST"FREP6RT DATE: oeceflbe�r 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H: Maguire, City Engineer BY- Judli Aces CS, Junfor Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING' �THE- Wk -IN'COWECTION WITH ANXEXATIOW'NO.,�6 rOR TRACT NOS. 13279 AND 13443 (VICTORIA) TO STREET LIGHTING, • rAINTENMCE DISTRICT NO. 3 It is recomiended that Of Council approve the-, attached resolution . an ordering the work In connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting yv Maintenance OiWfct No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS I - Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the 'work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Strefit Lfghtipq Maintenance District No. 3 for Trtct Nos. 13279 and 13443 (Victoria). The- developer of,:the subject tracts has been notified of the attached _public hearing by mail. The resolution also approves the Engineet.@s Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. .629. qRn -p 3 bmitted, AtUchmnts -:041 RESOLUTION N0. F-2-(,99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF DIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANNGA ORDERING THE WOR.0 IN COMECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING NAINTENWCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. _3274 AND 13443 (VICTORIA) WdEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rencho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of November, 1487, ado t its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -630 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting H19ntenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -630 w:s duly end leggally published in the time, form and manrer a, re aired by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution at' Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS. otter, the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of iooravemento, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the AffidavIt of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and IOIEREAS, after the adoption therenf, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property Mention to be assessed for the imyrove•aents described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -630 according to the names and addresses of such ovaers as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Curamorga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, fors, and manner as repired by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Hailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and oral and doccumentary, concerningcthe jurisdiction factsdin this eproceeding cand concerning the necessity for the conte plated .cork and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to ordtr the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -630, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: The assassments and method of assesseent in the Engineer'siare hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. I CITY Of RANCHO CUCkVNGA Street Lighting Melntenance DistrictrNo. 3 (victoria) Annexation No. 6 for Tract Nos. 13279 and 13443 SECTION 1. Aute o for Report ,_, This report 's in compliance with the revuirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15. of the Streets and Highways Code, Stato of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Descriotion Street This City Council has elected to •.nex all flaw developments, into determined that theistreetclights tfoo be maintained will have an effoct upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street eights. Work to be provided for with the assesa+ents established by the district are: The usualutaintenance ,soperatingdandLeservieng ofestreetr'light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altas Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost ;hall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by conditions the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the of a Refere�ncediseherreebytmade to t approved subject tract a�ap or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of arty improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. m p'., t SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be iecurred'for street lighting improvetwit construction. All improvements will be constructed by davelopars. Based on available data, it is estimated that malntentnce coots for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are'eatimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost, data. Street Lighting Maintenance Oistrict`No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised.of streetlight improveants on major streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and spartmonts)<throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone wi11 be assessed as one,assessaent unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrfal,•commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 3,is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* Yi0 No. 6 Total 5800L 758 112 870 9500L 6 76 82 16,000L - -- - -- - -- 22,000L 27,500L - -- - -- _ -- *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lases Rate No's Mint. Cost 6800L 870 X $ 8.93 x 12 f 93,229.20 9500L 82 X $10.16 X 12 9,997.44 16,000L - -- X $12.00 X 12 0 22,000L - -- X $13.84 X 12 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Maint. Cost • $103,226.64 2. Total Assessment Units: YTO Assess Units before this annexation • 2,257 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 a 157 Total Assessment Units 2,414 i r 3, Cost'oer assessment Unit:M1, Total Annual MaleGnante Cosc • $103 226 64 (42.76 /year /un1V - No. o _n s- n, str c , , r Assessment s)all_apply to esh lot or parcel as explefned in'Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagram, are attached' to', this report and labeled Street Llgbting Maintenance District No- 3•, Annexation No. 6. These diagrams are hereby incorgorated within c.. text of this Mpotk. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal,for'each unit. When units are based on acreage. - gssessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annax a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and deceraines to fora a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in :'^y, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. `h �i N Pro Ject Zone I T Mal I 7 TRI3443 Zone 2 1. Wft pi EXHIBIT "A" M'p s to bt included within Anrlijetto 0. to Strest L19ttjmq,741nt*n&1fcg Ofstrict 3: ProPortles,and f I;v 6 Assou;,t- 7 Acreage rnTf—,f— 5808E ILML: 22.bWL 27,508L"'., 13 73 76 ... 39 — 167 ilz 76 ... ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM f STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. .5 ANNEXATION NO. N s 0 :r ` w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • �� COIJIM, OF SAN BBRNARDINO , STATE OF CALIFORNIA t ,< ; C: '(•3!..•:.i•dtyi y' '. 'met..; '. e. , _v ✓. -.,• „y _� 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCALiOi IGA TA ; _ w STAFF'REPOR.T" A DATE: December 16, 1987'a > ,21 Lir7 ^i TO: City Council and City Manager ' FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THC•WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION `140. 6 FOR OR 87 -22, DR'.36 -42 AND CU; 85 -'7 (PCL 3 OF PH 9487) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 I RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resoldtion "- ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for OR 87 -22, OR 86 -42 and CUP 85 -37 (pcl 3 of PH 9487). The developers of the subject developments have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Repot tentatively approved by Resolution No. 87 -631. Respectful ubotitted, C., :3A:sd w Attachments RESOLUTION Y,O. 9'7m(- 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 07 -22, OR 86 -42 AND CUP 85 -37 (PCL 3 OF PM 9487) WHEREAS, the City C)uncll of tha City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th da; of November, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87 -632 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenan:e District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 87 -632 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as roquirad.by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Rosolu tic n of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, to m, and number as required by lax, as appears from the Affidavit of PostL•. % .d notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention vere duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described In said Resolution of intention No. 87 -632, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87 -632, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; anF- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e�por�t are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts eve been occupied. .213 CITY OF RANCHP C "AMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 6 for OR 87 -22, OR 86-42 and CUP 05 -37 (pel 3 of PM 9487) SECTION 1. Authority for Report Chaptersl,YDlWStan115 Of the Streets and HlghcryTseCode,fStatecof 4, Cal ifornia (Landicapfng and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Oeseri tion Street lLighting elected Nor U.alThe new City Councilthasno determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments ds well as on thG lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to to provided for with the assessments established by tha district are: usualu services ervaling of streetljjghtand improvements on major streets (arterial and certair. collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altos Map which 1s on file with the Cfty Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and aEifleatlons The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by conditions of the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the Engineering Division. ReferenceaIsih� y madeatoathe subjectttract map or developeent plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of ItghtT areas. The an the and made ea part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hareto. Detailed maintenance activities on tt, street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of tta subject area. t SECTION 4, Estimated'Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is astimated'tha: maintenance costs for assessmont purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actu d assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District Nu. 6 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of streat'light improvements on ma,lor streets for residential improvements (single family, multi- family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, coammercial and institutional oa ects throughout the City, It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, comeer.,fal and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Nafnt..rance and Energy Cost: No. of Ls Lamps Annnax New Lase Lamy Size' YTD No. 6 Total_ $80OL 35 6 41 9500L 2 - -- 2 16,0001. - -- - -- 22,000L --- --- --- 27,500L ... --- --- *High pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate No's Paint. Cost 5800L 41 X S 8.93 X 12 $4,393.56 9500L 2 X $10.16 X 12 • 243.84 16,ODOL - -- X $12.08 X 12 0 22,000L - -- X $13.84 X 12 • 0 27,500 - -- X $15.31 X 12 0 Total Annual Paint. Cost $4,637.40 2. Total Assessment Units: YTJ Assess Units before this annexation • 215.18 Assessment Unit: this annex per page 4 • 45 Total Assassxnt Units 260.18 »e 7 , a 3. Cosier Assessment Unit: :¢.,` Totat °Annual Nalntenance Cost P1637.40 $17.82/i6ar/uni"t Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcol as explained In Section S. SECTION S. Copies of the proI 7joii'Assefsment 06irdes are attached to this report and labeled *Nreot Lighting Maintenance District No. f". Annexation No. 6. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of tits report. SECTION 6. AsseL Improvements for the District are found to'be of aeneral benefit to all units within the District and that as sessnet shal he eual fr each unit. When units are based on &MA90, assessmennt viill be 2 q units o par net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District ard sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in KAY, the City Engineer files a report with the Citk* Council. S. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or ciedifies and approves thn individual Assessments. 4N`i, 4 A." 4 r K ✓ • 'k EXHIBIT 'A' Properties and iepraeeents to he ircladad within Annexation Ho. 6 to Street Lighting Paintenanee District 6: Project Acreage VMS,—. 53DOL 9ZOOL 16.000L 22.000L 27JOOL Zone 1 Zeno 2 DR J7 -22 12.6 25 . -_ i ... - -- OR 8542 5.15 18 6 - -- ... . -- - -- CUP 85 -37 „ (pcl 3 of PM 9437) _ 22.59 45 6— s II s. r,• i s, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. /o ANNEXATION NO. (o J �w l+ I 1. lei Ott SWE nwr 1 I CITY OF RANCHO CITCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CAI.Yi+OWU _ T m 61 6I e -j:Y"r' :r ".W.�'A3:Ya,'�h�b:, z� ` :..x. ^. -• '-Z.'i '+; r ,:,.,.ct..r.- -r: -:. -.L �;�;.a� ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. (o 51 VC 5, u� ry Cl'.'Y OF RA?ICHO we AMONGA COUNTY OIL SAN BffF1 &RDINO STATE OF CAtIFORNIA N j a .. a:_. =�;2Y Ys •'v3Y..'T•- 1;��.,- „ "$+.�� fir, IE 9 -F r m ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION W. 6 N69:S24(9E J3Q�9' I III 1 I � O QI I ,fir QI � Z PARCE I PARCEL A n PARCEL 14 m IN� D'.'.L9ifi PARCEL 13 PARC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y ._, COUNTY OF SAN BWARDINO r BTATL OF CALIFORNIA r . f "f n N i St �� W". !fin � � •� ...• 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUrAh10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council'and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Eminent Domain action to acquire public right -ofway for the Base Line Road Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue at the property located at 9549 Roberds Court (APN 202 - 161 -09) for the construction of street improvements . across the Base Line Road frontage of said property RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directfng staff to proceed with condcanation of right -of -way for thw construction of street improvements on Base Line Road across the Vropertles located at 9519 Roberds Court (APR 202- 161 -09) in the City of Rancho Cuamonga. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Li Eminent Domain action to P c pjr Base ne RoadWideninngStreetIroveme t rojet. The roectslimitsare from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue. The property owners of the Darcel in oaestion, APR 202 - 161 -09 have been offered the exchange of right -of -way Yor improvements. As of this date, negotiations to acquire such right -of -way continue without execution of a right -of -way exchange or purchase agiee=nt. Although negotiations continue, it is felt necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right -of -way for the proposed Base Lfne Road Widening Street Improvements. This is done to avoid further delays in constructing the improvements currently on hold due to lack of right -of -way. ResP led, t �y i �,.•4? +`Y.54ggq �� ±��tTT`�Ft _ � _ �i �N. ^:r..: : tl,.'q e�yr ..s }tt�.', '4av3"i -...tV ��y�st$S�A,'•. •� � =� -� '.�'- :.�5}�,.r�:�F1 S?V %<'�t/ "': YU RESOLUTION NO. 97 A RESOLUTIOY OF THE:CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY'TOtCnHOEMi A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED'INTRE CITY OF MCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT-,THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cuca& iqa has comWcted a study pertaining to the design, construction and street widening project for Bese Line Road. Basal upon the study uwducted, it has been oetermined that tta most reasonable and feasible alignment for the'proposed street widening will require the acquisition of a right -of -way across a portion of a residentially zoned parcel, more particularly described herein; (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Grierndent Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has wade an offer to the owners of record to m14,5ire the praoerty for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuations; (iii) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 40404, a City may acquire private property by condemnation When it is necessary for extending and widening streets, as well as for tht. construction of drains, s",ers and acqueducts; (iv) On December 16, 1987, this Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the terms of California Ccde of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, is is hereby found, determined arvd resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reso u on. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which 1s required for a right -of -way o- Tor-m Train and street wide ng8 purposes is situattd in,the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' and incorporated herein by this reference. r -;- • '' - .FC:,Si'di¢,�. nyr :_ 't ,rzr :;y,. .i j�•_ v'. 11N Resolution r Resolution _ December 16, 1987 _ .,, page 2 SECTION 3: cased apart-the substantial avidence presented to this Council or na a above- r►7erenced yyuahll.- hearing, including written staff reports, the Lity Council spe- tfically finds as follows: a. The public interest and ne:•essity require tha proposed project; a. project; rt The public interest and necessary quira the p- oposed b. The proposed project is planned or- lo:ated in'the manner that will be most coupatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined it this Resolution is necossary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fate market value has been code to the owners of said real prop.-ty pursuant x the terns of California Gaoeraent Code Section 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Cocncfl hereby declares its Intention to acquire the proper escribed in Secf;fon 2, above, by proceedings in eminent domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to briny an action in the Sueprior Court of the State of Califorria for the County of San Bernardino, fit the name of the City of Rancho Cucaoongd, against all owners and claimants of the property described he—in for the purpose of condemning and acquiring a right -of -way for street pr..poses, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final doterminatioP in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixinq the -mount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to tako possession and cse of said real property for tha uses and purpotes he rain described. Resolution. .i SECTION S: The City Clerk shall ce.fy to the adoption of -his PASSED and ADOPrm this day of , mayor w� dYq'vr �p #: �Atttttt� fir' � ' '•" ~ t That fau" of tot C. Clan t. AcOaaa taa5tau E_a AiaoC.atln, b the Clp of taxtM OIa"t, " w flu 'Scuds, to _ K bp. als ft. ta, urft1a1O Crap O oo ft rsartfta u t /Liss,:, •% - . w llab Ifft at tut tfa ass t[t fat tut IM at m atWSt caw N at /- bra &7.114 fast. start r lam. to t.! :hY if" If Ub-Wft tout CI &W� t ,, tit Copy at SY cs. 24""mm If at" tmt forty '3. 1713. it tot{ :03. paps toy. 9fft:fu tttoratt eta" ta„ 81st ta:O111 It" of uta beads Cost" 399.'3 frt. tl. r IM V bo 4u lift at to albui 10 L if LOU t AM J. Slat t of Ufa Cauanf, 11evxW A,austt "1 tlOCa Seats sign Y Can Ila of tit. tat $I that Alm to bra ItO st u" Lift total area bu uan to brts It" If Use Lift ewe 10,03 .. - frt, sa.t cr Im b the fain of ttfiftt ". ' To "mutt or m cart b co urct aa.tu. At:otr. 410 K, apa0aatp, stmt t,M, amt 11"It. $tmt fa..wrt:. mat r: 9tVMMu. Pal ". auras W fruits" W all .tams, Su[mm]a tftrallao r.' �1 tau Iaatop call coal" b •9tmadty IIra.Am. for W CIW J.•• of Gaata Caan__a U:a Catttr sift tWtsma bra"9 1w. 111 (1"t .w coassnott" tasty", Ntot9 a mt0 W frra" tf ba telltarrlta 91"151" of to Catesttf aauol.at 9"artaat fr Is" Cob i of Rod" C¢sep5. S� F= All rag v Idp Malt coals a faatabif tlfa "'ot" of •9rftr b Co'SO —C' Lit. it ac rASROa Ilia, 0 day, tftr,fat, 00 • City tetlraor atf" cc W tgorlatntl "t of svc.a tall C=U asst a "LTACM:t. b M as sa IN Mt Wm/ I "11 W t Ila teat the Or"9or V • 't .... ,rl. y I I > rs 0 �m t O au —a —a e e S M M t>•Q 7 1- --.rag —t---- --- ----- t (� • � .ExHl2f1'T 'As, ' tae .•_. -148 �f Y.i I R ,t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA iTAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BV: Blane M. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public, Hearing for the purpose of hear'ng and passing upon objections or protests, if any, which may be raised by any pro perty outer or other interested party regarding the Notice of Public Hearing and Order to CZ— struct that was posted on December 1, 1987, at 9569 Roberds Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in yccordawe with Chapter 27 of the improvement Act of 1911 for the base Llne Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue. RECOPWAAnON: It is recommended that City Counc'1 adopt the attached Resolution ordering the City Engineer, actin gg as Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the installation of improvesents at APN 202- 161 -OS, if such improvements have not been installed 60 days after December 16, 1987, in accordance with :hapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the fomation of an assessment district described as: APH 202- 161 -09 That land situated in tke State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of dancho Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Naps, Page 46, San Bernardino County Records as describeu as follows: Coomere-ing at a point of the North line of Base Line Road 165 feet East of the Southwest corner of Lot 6; thence North 300.84 feet, core or less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deed recorded February 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence East along the South line of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East line of the westerly 10 acres of Lots 5 and 6, Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence West along the North line of Base Line Road 160.93 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. CCSR DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 2 �i Background /Analysis On Deceatsmr 1, 1987, the attached 'Notice of Public Hearing and Order to Construct' was posted in front of the property located at 9549 Roberts Court, identified by APH 202- 161 -09. This Notice was posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and orders the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights base paveausts, street pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals therewith. The property owners are instructed, that they are given sixty (60) days, from-the day of Resolution adopption (December 16, 19071 to construct said improvements. After 60 days is up, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, will cause the inprovements to be constructed and the property owner will be assessed for all the costs. The costs will be paid by the formation of an assessment for all the costs. The costs rill be paid by the formation of an assessrent district which will include APN 202- 161 -09u and are described as follows: APN 202 -16 -09 That land situated in the State of California, County of San Oernardino and described as follows: That portion of Lot 6, Bicck 8 Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as )e: plat recorded in Book 6 of 1Gps. Page 46. can Bernardino County Records described as follows: Commencing, at a point an the North line of Base Line Road 165 feet East of the southwest corner of Lot 6; thence North 300.84 feet, more of less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deed recorded February 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence East along the South line of said Retards Court, 160.93 feet, mora or less to the East line of the westerly 30 acres of Lots 5 and 6, Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence Nest along the North line of Base Line Road 160.93 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Upon he ring protests or objections, if any, at the public hearing, Council is requested to make a ruling and directive to staff regarding protests and direct the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Street, to proceed with said improvements, if such have not been �;?G "Y. Eff 0 1 N � CCSR DECEMBER 16, -,I987 % PAGE 3 constructed within sixty (60) days, and to further order the for�tfon ;i" an assessment distiicrwhich will include' the before mentioned p parcels, W - PAY for said improvements. Respectfully submitted, RHH:81(F:palp Attacleents NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDER TO CONSTRUCT Pursuant to Sections 5875 of the California Code for Streets and Highways entitled 'Duty to Construct': 'The ewers of lots or portions of lots fronting on any public street or place when that street or place has been improved by the construction of sidewalks or curbs for a total frontage of more than fifty percent (SD%) on one side of such street or place in any block, or where a petition signed by the owners of more than sixty percent (60%) of the front footage of any part of an unimproved portion or portions of a i; block has h-en filed with the City Clerk requesting the installation of such improvements in front of said part, or whenever the legislative body of the City upon its mm motion; orders the installation of such improvements in front of said part, shall have the duty of constructing or causing construction of sidewalks or curbs in front of their properties upon notice so to do by the superintendent of streets'. On December 16, 1987, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the legislative body for the City, will meet to adopt a Resolut4or '.. ordering the construction of curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, atreet pavements, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbinq and all other incidentals involved therewith. Notico to Construct Pursuant to Section 6876 of the California Codes for Streets and Highways, the City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga under the direction of the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all parties holding legal possession of that property located at 9549 Roberds Cuurt, more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel No, 202- 161 -0@ being described as follows: That land situated in the State o California, County of San Bernardino, and is described as follows: !. P = •NS :.TM. V.� uv. _ ... "4 That portjoq' of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga.'8omestead= Association, in the City, of 'Rancho Cucamonga; as 'per• plat'reeorded in "T`.,' Book 6 of Maps, Page-46, San Bernardino County Records' described as,.. follows: Cementing at a point on the North line of Base Line Road 165 feet East of the Southwest comer of Lot 6; thence North 300.84 feet, more or less, to the South line of Roberds Court as deeded to the County of San Bernardino by deed Recorded February 13, 1931, in Book 699, Page 185, Official Records; thence cast along the South line of said Roberds Court, 160.93 feet, more or less to the East line of the westerly 10 acres of Lots 5 and 6, Block 8 of said Cucamonga Homestead Association; thence South along the East line of said Lot 6; being also the North line of Base Line Road; thence Nest along the North line of Base Line Road 160.93 feet, more or less to the point of begim.irg. — - To comtruct or to cause to const.-uct curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base pavehents, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals therewith. Such workings shall conform to 'Standard Drawings' for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1984 Edition Ath supplements through 1987. All plans and construction workings subject to review and peruit by the Engineering Division of the Cocnunity Development Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All such workings shall commence immediately upon enactment of "Order to Construct* and, if not commenced within 60 days thereafter, the City Engineer acting as the superintendent of streets shall cause such construction to be done and the cost thereof shall be a lien upon the property. `(., � "��2£py����- "iFz4.' „'�•- s"'�:'�;a. Y !`• -. `r �: r,.�a�t= i'.t.•...��.,,!! � ^, �'+P.�a'+7 Notice_ of Public•Hearine "Pursuanttto ^Section 5878.1 of the ,Jcrfstree'ts and Ht 9hways, ycu ? alifornla Codesare•herepyno$tfled . , 6f-, a public_"hearing• to".be hi d. at. the Lions Park 'Co�n1/y Center.•by the City Courctl for'the City }Council of Rancho Cucamonga,, W bear and, pass upon protests or"objections4to this Notice to Construct. Such meeting will begin at the hour pS.1 p. a: on " the 16th day of December, 1907. The Lions Part Co piw _ _y Center is located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucasonga, California.`• 'The decisioua of the City Council or., all final and conclusive. protests and objections shall. he Anyone having any, questions or concerns on this issue 1s encouraged to cantact the City of Rancho Cuca'onga, Enginiering Division, Design Section, at 989 -1862 or visit the office at 9330 Base Line Road; -" Suite 203, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Anyone wishing, to comment on this issue is encouraged to attend the public hearing. X30. - alum I A .1RESDLUTION NO. N A RESOLUTION OF'JHE CITY COUNCIL OF—THE CITY.W. 'RAMC!10_ CUCIMMGAI'K ORDERING ,i THE .',CDKMUCTION- OF"� IMPROVEMENts '-AT -9549 RDBEROS "COURT; APR Y ABLIC '202-162-09 'IP ACCORDANCE" WITH •THE CALIFORNIA FOV,STREk7S-.AK6` HIGHWAYS SECTIO M, SB7VTVRU'5880 'MORE1COMH0XLY MOM, AS CHAPTER 27 OF'MOVVAW Adf,'OF 1911 V- WHEREAS, on Dec►ber 1. 1987. the City Eng'Meer acting under O the authority of the City Council of the City -of Rancho Cucamonga had Posted at the subject Ircation a Formal Notice to Construct Public Y. Improvements. WHEREAS, on-this dita December' 16. 1987. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga' h&s met to hear all protests or objections from any interested parties to tho'Order to Construct;' and upon hearing all obje.tions, resolves ir,-t6c.ec=rk interest of public health, safety and welfare for the City of Rancho.Cucimonga that public- improvement be_- made at 9649 Roberds Court- and. berabyi'resol ves, and otherwise, issues' an 'Order to Construct" streat'fr-mtage'improvements consistin(gof, parking lane pavements, curb$, gluttersi,sidewalks.-parkr4y gradIngs, drive approaches and street lights and; alltdrcidentAlz thereto in conformance to the •Standard Drawingso, of.tha.City Of Rancho Cucamonga,-1984-Edition with supplements through 1987.'.wfth all?-plans and:construction• work being subject to review anti permit by the Engineering'Divisfan of,the Community Developement Department of the City'Of Rancho Cucamongaf. All work shall commence within sixty (60) . days - of the execution of this resolution and If not commenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, shall cause such construction to be made, and in pursuance to tne statutes of the Californti Codes for Street & Highways shall proceed with actions to assess the costs therefore as tax lien upoh that real property described as: APR 202-161-09 That land situated in the Stata of (.,11for-ila. County of San Be rdi and described as follows: rna no That portion of Lot 6, Block 8, Cucamonga Homestead Associ,4tion, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as Per Plat recorded in Book 6 or MAPS, Page 46, San Bernardino County Records describ*d as follows: 11 *" ,"WUVAW I e RESOLUTION W-*--,i PAGE' 7! rJ 7fTm1tUsij: Cowncing at,d P014 oe'the Worth line of Base LAne'Ro&M16S -,'�"S- r a p, f the Southviest,'comir'R, Lot-, G;�,thenee, North, 3DO.W ftet,e. "re, oriessN;�� -v,. , XRW to the South,11ne of,Rq6erds, Court as deeded Wh4z;I� -MY'A." �M. ,toltheIC6untyApf�Sa 1. Bernaijinn-by, dead Irtcorded February Offictal Records; 'thencel East' al ong the South.lir*-_'of,;s&fd Roberd'is,Co.uAti",;, -I 160.93 feet.- morie'or,lotss,'to the-East',line Ot-wsterli-JO icres7ofLotiS and 6, Block 8 Of -s&id_UcmOn9A�Hmest1&d'Asz d:LW6;�beinj along the East-IiW ot.'sai the North a Road; thence.Ilest :long Ahii,Morth liwof.Base Lfne'Road'160.934fae more or less to th pointrof"kWnning. ti ✓w TNt snob of cot A. Ile1 1, hcrwp WtttK4 ` _2 �'yyy Asudattr. It the City of 4W cw'"'. u w put Hard" is y Ilk 0 At fp. top 64, W krumm Cady rxrtt dtcrlbl At - +• foltwt- - yriK At t PItat m"W 3" Ito of Lott M boo 164 Mt Lott of W Swtiwit n~ p Lot It slab IMb 700.64 lost. own w, ion, • � _ zt• , b tw `S4 ,=-if Sorts Cast u _dons b W Cory. of W ,s SAM"-'b,4o totwdt fotntq 11: lint is boo 01;,Iw In. ' ✓� OfflnU [M I tlrn Lon all" tw Sent Ito p 6411 Fiewo Cawt.` 110.15 /ut.•art w lrs is W Lon 1164 of, tb wnsX' 10 atm At ?r4,, LM S W 4;f ISM 1 Of rt1 Ctrnp MrMiM'1 AorCyitlrl, Wani tw Swb Afrp tho Lott Ila p tili cot It MK aio AA ,,aru 1164 f ckt Lob UK Audi tlrtt 40 001 tw bb If" of Stb Lima 4 164.17 ;uf - in% o ti fon b w point of wSimif. ' U�+ a To srstrrt w 4 CIW b irtbrt tah, part, enn dt'tc tnntdwt. I1iet4 AMt. SYwt Ifou. Strat_lwttttt4. oa fs: psrau. I241K. 9164nK, at IrNItK at all ttM 1ocldoult .. tbnsltL . Sod wnlop tail 6w" b •Snt m OmtKP fw tw City t ' of bum Catrwit 1164 "It1K dt/ asllwi':� 01w1A 1f0. All sua W tattrrtiw "W"s ayrt b mlas W prdi N W I^ LoS1wrIM Oltuir of the holy Oonlarat OyattwN for the CIO of [oKb Cutup. L All o® twttap SWI cwrstn frlubty'W ttabat p "' '• 'Ordw b Ctatoon att. it wt ntrc . dtlda W OW tbnlfbr. tb Cty lotion Actin AS the tow stomest of strwu lull can btl twstnetlr b b Oro at if* cost tltna Wll All A Ila as tw MtDh4. ac..t trr.ttb MIT ' Q • I Q Q r Q I�1 tour � g�7, ® to I i t m O e o L a r 1ir-- I 254. • ^K. ±.t ...w•,••i ..v _ .�.. � »z'• cl.t�:l�tka�.a 9 C --M OF R&NCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Manager FROM: Mark Lorimer Sr. Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Mobilehome Rent Stabillzatiod After more than ten months of intense negotiations between the City, the mobilebone park owners, and residents, it appears that an extension to the existing mohilehome rent stabilization accord will be presented t_ I& City Council on Wednesday. December 16. At the time the City Council agenda packets w'll be prepared, negotiations ware still continuing, and a final agreement had not been reached. However, staff Is confident that final, concurrence by both the park owners and residents committees will be granted prior to December 16 so that th a final accord may be drafted and presented to the City Council at your upcoming regular meeting. 1 will be contacting the City Counci, throughout the week of December 14 and providing up- to- minute updates regarding the accord. Staff will be meeting with resident committees on Thursday, December 10 in order 'to discuss a final acceptance of the accord provisions which the park owners have recommended. Again, staff suspects that a final resolution will be made prior to the December 16 City Council meeting. Thank you for your patience and understarAing regarding this issue. The ultimate goal In resolving the mobilehome rent stabilization issue is to gain matual support for the accord by the City, the park owners, and the park residents. The sensitive nature of this issue warrants that we continue to address any problems o concerns which are presented, however so minimal or minor Hopefully, a smooth resolution to this issue is forthcoming. ML:ba aZq i Ott. a'Y 4�A x Y ' ft — CITY OF RANCHO CIiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 16, 1987 To: City Courcll and City Hanaler FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: North Side of Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue 1. Ramona Avenue RECOM DATICN: It is recommended that the City Council approve a majcr maintenance project for ti^ perking lane along the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Ramona Avenue to Hellman Avenue Said project is to include curb and curb and gutter repair, grinding of the existing pavement and a pavement overlay graded for drainage. The project is to be funded from unallocated funds. Backgro-'nd /Analysts In recent months, staff has received numerous coaplaints regarding tha condition of the parking lane en the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue an' Ramona Avenue. A number of these complaints have been registered by the owner of A 6 R Tire. .although a numbcn• of the proolems are related to on -site maintenance, and therefc,re are the owner's respmisibility, these problems are complicated by poor drainage and potholes within the parking lane of Foothill 7nulevard. Since Foothill Boulevard is a state highway and under the ,jurisdiction of Caltrans, staff has been careful not to assume the responsibilities of this state agency. However, we have been working closely with the local Caltrans Mainterance Supervisor to the extent that the City hat completed some marking of curbs and our maintenance section has provided support in the form of sweeping for debris cleanup ahead of Caltrans asphalt patching crews in the problem area. Tnese efforts have been inadequate to cure the larger problem and staff is attempting to deal with Caltrans at a higher level because it has became apparent that the extent of work necessary to solve these problems could entail a significant project. Howaver, recent conversations have not been promisipg with respect to coaxing an acceptable project out of the State. - ass r C. A major maintenance prc_act to the par•rigg ;ane along the ' north side of Foothill b:Nlavard from Arr -wna Avenue to Hellman Avenue. Psis projelt would lrciude curb and curb and gutter repair, grinding of tier cai;ting paverRnt and a pavement overT.y graded for druinage. e The total ectimated cost including design and construction is $54,000 end is broken down as follows: Archibald Ave.to Ramona Ave. $20,000.01 Archibald Ave. to Klusman Ave. 14,000.00 Klusaan Ave. to Hellman Ave. 20,000.00 D. The last option would be to continue to solicit regular maintenance of the worst areas from Caltrans while c-ntinuing to request the State to find a major maintenance project in the area. I'• ', t.. �a `•. //,,gyp t DECEMBER 16, 1987 ly PAGE 2 p _•• - In addition, it, should be -noted that the two blocks to the west of -� -, Archibald Avenue- are- in similar condition., Although not, quite as deteriorated as the north side of, Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, 'the north side of Foothill Boulevard from „ Archibald Avenue to Klusman Avenue and Musman Avenue to Hellman Avenue, should also be `considered -'for improvements if ,a project is to be undertaken. We have a numbe -• of options: A. A Widening and Improvement project to the p4rkway and parking lane along` the north sine of, Foothill Boulevard, } as noted above, ;but only between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue: -,. It• is estimated'that the -cost of - this _ project will be $85,000: B. A Widening and 1.3provement project to the parkway and parking lane 'along the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Ramona Avenue to Hellman'Avenue. The estimated cost of this project including design, oi*i construction of curb and gutter, sidrwdlk, drive app,o nines and pavement is $250,000. ,This - sitaitU Is !gored to a right -of -way exchange proggram'and therefrra daas get in Jude right -of- way acquisition cast.. C. A major maintenance prc_act to the par•rigg ;ane along the ' north side of Foothill b:Nlavard from Arr -wna Avenue to Hellman Avenue. Psis projelt would lrciude curb and curb and gutter repair, grinding of tier cai;ting paverRnt and a pavement overT.y graded for druinage. e The total ectimated cost including design and construction is $54,000 end is broken down as follows: Archibald Ave.to Ramona Ave. $20,000.01 Archibald Ave. to Klusman Ave. 14,000.00 Klusaan Ave. to Hellman Ave. 20,000.00 D. The last option would be to continue to solicit regular maintenance of the worst areas from Caltrans while c-ntinuing to request the State to find a major maintenance project in the area. N CCSR DECEMBM 16, 1987. PAGE 3 - It is the opinion of,staff that,options 'A' and OBO would be too costly at this time., Option 'D" As! unacceptible, since it would,, not,' be' • immediately responstve�-Wthe,�,rpeods-of our citizen - _RC, �;Md*- appear to be,Oe m6sf-;v1&hli "course of 'action S;� Option V du to cost and time limitatibns. Wshould'be;hotid.that option OC• is-intended to be a maintenance- project -Lwith-,1'iK -estimatad, life of, two, to �,five-y6rs. However, t is anticipited,"that. sufficient new, developaint rand /or 1 renovation will take place, along, Foothill Boulevard in the next two .'to, five years to satisfactorily replace, the parking lane work completed by: this project with new improvements. Respec submitted, Y r, Changes to the agenda: C33. Amount should be 520,800 instead of $ ?4,800. F2. flew title should be read as'follows: Public hearing for the'piiryose of hearing ,ad passing upon objections or protests, if any, Mitch may be,-raised by,any Property owner.-or other Interested party roaardirg the Notice of Public Ifearina and Order to Construct that was posted on,,;.-_ 49 >:i December 1. 1 §87, at 55oberds Court in:the City of Rancho Ceamonga in• accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement "Act of 1911 for the Case Line Widening Project between Archibald _ Avenue and Nellmaa Avenue n4� C -7 `a�Sg :{vr M3 MIN wa�tr 4 S o � .'If V� k�r1 J '14k. -.... i — ✓ `r � `j�Y'A` I N��F f +�Y MOBILE HOME PARK RENT STABILI.4TION ACCORD •- Rent Increase Provisions Present Accord Proposed �a3 'Consumer Price Index Up to 125% CPI -U/Y Up to 1005 CPI -U (CPI) "Consumer Price Index N/A 3 - 9% (Range) *Pass Through for by to 100% Up to 100% Increase Government ' Taxes, Assessments and Fees 'Pass Through for N/A Up to that portion above- M Increased Utility Charges CPI Increase ' *Pass Through for Capital Included in CPT Up to 100% on eligible Project prn�acts valued at-over 510,000 if residents first approve. • Ircrease due to vacancy N/A Upp to 5% of base rent (f9.U0 - $19.00) Ma r. .B ' ..- rr�i�YW�i .�,6Bk�`ayRkR"Fv^'r��.._��. ..p. •a. =n.!: y� .��i�-• +•�•y'F:'1'^ y' : WW1AK A. VAN'DIYK n Anmm7 -AoLw Q1Q Sa6/ H OW& ALpw Ciro nw ni" 337 N. Pugad is Oaud&. CA 917" Decembor 10, 1987 J[AhO. DELIVERED 0 b' Ms. Beverly Authelet, City Clork +gar- City of Rancho Cucamonga 9370 Baseline Road, Suite "C" P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ?' RE: My Clients: Wayne and Erma Dennis 3 Real Property: 9349 Roberds Court, Rancho Cucamonga APH Number: 409- 161 -09 _ Nearing Re Resolution of Necessity Request to Appear and Be Heard , ` Dear Ms. Authelot: This office represents Wayne and Rrma Dennis, owners of the above described real property. Pursuant to the Notice of Intention Re Adoption of Resolution Necessity relating to the above described real property, please be advised that the property owners, Wayne and Erma Dennis, hereby request an opportunity to appesr and be heard at the hearing calandared for Docember 16, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. ' We aDpreciatu your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, WILLIAM A. e11 Dyk 6Ed @IYgG WAV /sp CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ADMINISTRATION cc: Mr a Mrs Wayne Dennis DEC 101987 ALA 4t9t>aC'+Etic2tsr115:8 a k 4w uloo al e<wmco t., 1000, 4?� 6 3 0 477 .000 1 6 Ll000�� 00010 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA ANO OWNERS OF THE MOBILE HONE PARKS WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA .E PROVIDING FOR AN APJNUAL NAXIKIN RENT ADJUSTMENT This Agreement, which shall be known as "THE MOBILE HONE PARK ACLVRD,' is made ani entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as 'City and the owners of all of the mobile home parks within the City, hereinafter individually and collectively referred to as 'Amer,' this 1st day of January, 3088, and 'provides as followse WITHESSF,TH: WHEREAS, there exists within the City and the surrounding areas a serious shortage of mobile home rental spaces, which has resulted in low vacancy rates and the potential for rising space rents{ and WHEREAS, because of the high cost of moving mobile homes, the potential-for damage resulting therefrom, the requirements relating to the installation of mobile homes, including permits, landscaping and site preparation, the lack of alternative home sites for mobile home residences and the substantial investment of mobile home owners in such homes, there exists a shortage of mobile home park spaces; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to protect the residents of mobile homes from unreasonable space rent increases, while at the same time recognizing the need for mobile home park owners to receive a ,lust and reasonable income sufficient to cover the costs of repairs, maintenance, insurance, employee services, additional amenities and other operations, as well as a Just and reasonable return on investment; and WHEREAS, It is commonly known that, after initial Installation, virtually all mobilehomes are never thereafter moved and when a resident decides to move, the mobilehome is commonly sold in place and If rents are below free - market levels, the possibility exists that a portion of the mobilehome space value might be transferred upon such sale unless space rents are alloyed to rise upon such sale to levels which are closer to or at free - market levels; and WHEREAS, decislo-is of a rent stabilization board or similar dectsion- making body may not necessarily fulfill the Intent of protecting mobile home residents from unreasonable space rent increases, nor do such decisions aiwav: provide an owner with the opportunity for a ,lust and reasonable income sufficient to operate a mobile home park, and to grin a fair and reasonable return on investment; and n' ez WHEREAS, concerns among residents and owners of mobile home parks over rent Increases and other park- related situations can often best be resolved between the two parties, pr -sided there exists the incentive for both parties to negotiate In good faith and,reach agreement; and WHEREAS, it is the Intent of this Accord to protect mobile home park residents from unreasonable space rent adjustments and mobile home park owners from infringement upon property rights'. and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 332 which creates a residence committee to each of the tight m',bile home parks, snd which authorizes the Mayor to execute this Agreement on bs :ialf the City; and WHEREAS, by mutual agreement, do Accord between the City and the Owners has teen In existence from January 1, 1985 to date and said kcord has fulfilled Its purpose by stabilizing rents during the period 1985 -1987 and of generally Improving relations between residents and owners within the City. However, under this original Accord issues remain unresolved concerning the "ollnwing matters; capital improvement costs; responsibility for unexpected increases In governmental costs, including utilities; meetings between owners and residents; and notice to new residents of Accord provisions. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated into this Agreement. 2. Consideration. In consideration of Owner entering into this Agreement, and Omer eeping and performing all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be kept and performed by Owner. City agrees that during the term of this Agreemert, provided that Owner is not in breach of this Agreement, the City Council o' City shall not enact any ordinance, rssOlution, or other regulation which imposes restrictions upon or otherwise controls Owner's increase or decrease of mobile home space rents. 3. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement the following words and phrases sh&-M have the meanings hereinafter stated: A. *Annual Pent Adjustment" shall wean the rent adjustment made to the Base Rent not more frequently :han once every 365 days. B 'Base Rent" shall be that rent charged by the mobile home park as of December 31, 1987, and re- calculated thereafter each year according to any Increase only for changes in the Consumer Price Index and shall not Include any additional increases other than CPI. C. "Capital Project" shall mean a project which Includes the construction of new improvements or the replacement of old improvements in a mobile name park including, but not limited to, construction, installation or replacement of a cluohouse or portions thereof, c=wn area facilities, swimming pool, suuna or hot tub, or other recreational amenities, streets and driveways, security gates, outdoor or common area lighting, retaining walls, sewer, r �r electrical, plumbing, water, or television reception systems, sprinkler systems, or any similar improvement which represents an addition to or an upgrading, of existing improvements. Capital pprojects may be improvements stated herein which have a life expectancy of five [5) years or more, which are treated as Capital Improvements for Federalr end State incoce tax purposes, which may 'not be deducted for such tax purposes. -as exrenses and which have a minimum value.of at least ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each project. Capital- ?rejects do not include improvements as rwrmal repairs or maintenance' or Insured repairs or incurred byisan ownertin tie shall occurs to anylfacilitysor Property within the mobile home park owned and /or maintained by Owner due to a disaster caused by an act cf God (i,e, earthquako, flood, tornado, wind storm„ etc.). -' D. 'Consumer Price Index* (CPI) shall mean the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI -U) as puJllshed for the Los Angel as. An(`eim- Riverside area by the U.S. Departeent-of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. E. "Mobile Nome' shall mean a structure designed. for h.lman habitation and for being moved on a street or highway under permit pursuant to Sectior 35790 of the Cai-l.fornia VohiCI4 Code, Mobile home includes a imnufactured home, as dafined in Section 18607 of the Health and Safety—Code, and a mobile home, as defined in Section 18008 of the California Health and Safety Code, but does not include a recreational vchirle, as defined in Section 799.24 of the California Civil Code and Section 18010 of the California Health and Safety code or a commercial coach as defined in Section 18001.8 of the California Health and Safety Code. F. 'Mobile Home Park' shall mean any area of land within the City where two or more mobile home spaces are rented, or held out for rent, to accommodate mobile homes used for human habitation. B. 'Mobile Home Space' :hall mean the site within a mobile home park Intended, designed, or used for the location or accommodation of a mobile home and any accessory structures or appurtenances attached thereto or used in conjunction 'herewith, or the location of accommouatlon of a recreational vehicle. H. ' 0wner' shall include the owner cr operator of a mobile home park or ati agent or representative authorized to act on said owner's or operator's behalf in connection with the maintenance or operation of such park. 1. 'Rent' shall mean the crnsideration, including services, amenities, and benefits In connection with the use and occupancy of a mobile home space. J. 'Resident' shall mean any person entitled to occupy a mobile home dwelling unit pursuant to ownership thereof or rental or lease arrangement with the owner of the subject dwelling ,.r,t. K. 'Resident Committee' shall mean that five - member committee for each mobile home park established by resolution of the City Council. L. 'Voluntary Vacancy' shall mean any one of the following: a sale or resa,s of a mobile home to a new resident(s); a removal of the mobile horde from the space; or a termination of tenancy pursuant to the Mobile home Residency Law. A sale, resale or transfer of interest between members of the same imzediate family (defined as the homeowner's legal spouse, the homeowner's lega: parents or the homeowner's legal children) shall not constitute a voluntary• vacancy under this provision. 4, Term. The term of this Agreement :hall begin on the latter of January 1, 1988, or the date on which all Owners have signed this Agreement, and shall end at 11:59 p.m., on December 31, 1991. S. Applicability. A. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all mobile hoar parks and all mobile home spaces within the City. except as provided in subparagraph D. B. This Agreement shalt not apply to mobile ,nme spaces covered by I at the effective date of this Agreement, which pr)vide for more than month -to -month tenancy, but only for the duration of such lease. Upon the expiration or other termination of any such tease, all provisions of this Agreetent shall immediately be applicable to the mobtia home spsce. C. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall preclude a mobile park resident from entering into a written lease with an Owner. 0. This Agreement shall not be effective for any purpose until it has been executed by duly authorized representatives of the Owners of all mobile home parks which are situatec' in the City as of Oececber 1. 1987. E. Nothing in this Agreement shall be desmed to Impose any obligation upon any Owner with respect to a mobile home park not subject to such Owner's control. 6 Mobile Home Parr. Re Istratidn, within sixty (60) days of written notice by t e City C ark, al Owners s all be required to file w th the City Clerk a Rent Registration Statement for each mobile hose space affected by this Agreement. The City Clerk shall devise such registration Torras so as to call for information reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes and policies u' this Agreement, and shall mail such forms to all Owners in sufficient time as to allow such Owners to file their Registration Statements. The Rent Registration Statement shall be made part of this agreement upon its filing. aft Ad.lustment. A. Advance Notice of: At least slvty (60) det. prior to the effective date of a rental adjustment, the Amer shall serve all affected residents, either personally or by aril, with notice 0 the proposed adjustment in accordance with state lew. Said notice shall also include the consumer price index as established by the City Managei. within five (6) days prior to any notice to park residents of a rent adjustment, the Owner shell provide the City Clerk with the following information: (1) The effective date of the noticed adjustment; (2) Identification of the mobile home spaces affected; (3) The amount of the ran, prior to the effective date of the _. notice for each of those mobile home spaces; (4) The amount of the increase (in dollars) for each of those mobile home spaces. (5) The quantity and identity of spaces under lease. B. Period of: No rental adjustment for a mobile home space shall be noticed or permitted or enforced more frequently than once every 355 days. C. Maximum Allowable Adjustment: (1) Once each year, an Amer shall be permitted to increase rents to excess of that which were lawfully charged during the previous year based upon the following: (a) One hundred percent (100%) of the change of the CPI, as tfined herein an* as established by the City Managar. Said increase shall not be less than three percent (311), nor greater than nine percent (911). (b) In addition to the changes permitted by subparagraph (1.1 above, Owner may be granted an increase or decrease in rent in the event of a change in the taxes, assessments, or levies imposed upon the mobile home park by local, state or federal government agencies. Documentation substantiating any additional increase due to a change in taxes, assessment fees, or levies must be submitted to the City before notice of such is made to any park resident. (c) In addition, Cwner may be granted an increase or decrease in rent in the event of a change in the amount charged to Gwner for refuse collection, sewer, rater, electric, gas and other public utility services. Owner may be grcnted said increase or decrease only for that increased amount charged which is greater than the previous year's base charges multiplied by any percentage change 'n the Consumer Price Index (CPI), as established in section C. subparagraph (ia). The amount adjusted for refuse collection for each space within a mobile home park shall not be greater than any adjustment for refuse collection made to residentisi units within the City. Documentation substantiating any such additional increase or decrease must be submitted to the City before notice of such is made to any park resident. (d) In addition, Owner may be granted a pro rata increase in rent in the event a capital project, as defined herein, is made within the mobile home park which exceeds a total cost of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) and which can be amortized over a five year period. Amer shall obtain approval 5 Multiply srt allowable r percentage in CPI aspro ided hereintodeteminee aaxlmum allowable rent adjustment, to which shall be added any additional increases allowed under subparagraphs 1(a)(b), the sum of which shall be rounded off to the nearest dollar. Formula Base Rent) x (CPI -U%) Dollar Adjustment Amount of CPI Rent (CPI Adjustment) + (additional increases) • Rent Increase• (Rent Increase*) + (Case Rent) • New Pant *Round off to nearest dollar ((.01 - .49 • .00) (.50 - ,99 • 1.00) E %R e 0) x (,04755) • $9,50 (59.50) + ($5.00) • ')14.50 (rounded off to $15,00) (515.00) + ($200.00) • $215.00 6 a of a iaaJorfty,cf-thr�toumber of spaces affected by the,Accord Capital before-fatd^ Project�is f4de:MItA. the *Mb:la home park., Owner sAa11:;eAtbtn.• trapproval' according" to may procadures set forth by the City, Clerk - :.,,taro g nted an',fncre as0 as,part%ot the annual -w rent,adjustment for,•thercast`of costsrasiociated ; carrying , with, said.project�r5a1d1Increas�e�wilTOe applicable orly to those spaces,cavered;by ` 7 , this agreement and shall De, based.oR�.the'totai Project cost equally,shared,apro !rate. among, the total 'of, - fr number Within' the mobile home park','_Jncreases for a capital pro,lJect'shell not be-part of the base rent and shall terafnate' after,, the fire- (5) 'period.`- Owner f year emortlzatton not be entitled to any additional incredse for a Capital - ,',^^• a Protect as;- part of a future annual•' rentnadjustment until the project is- completed. Ibjority approval of the residents ---cO l _ 'R? asset torch herein and'certifi such approval of the City prior to project constr ction 1s' required for projects. capital (3),* Annually, beginning on the effective date of this agreement, the City Vanager shall determine the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index which shall be 4 used to calculate rent adjustments allowed`-for all applicable mobile home spaces. Said percentage CPI shall ~ be calculated by dividing the sum of all monthly CPI percentage changes during the previous year twelve, hnge CPI released n ed ng with teCPI rel edinJanuary Of, the previous Dreuy, and, rV year. The Clerk, upon request, shall notify .a Omer of such allowable Consumer Price Index. shall be according to tthhetfollowing forla: Increases allowable under this Section i Multiply srt allowable r percentage in CPI aspro ided hereintodeteminee aaxlmum allowable rent adjustment, to which shall be added any additional increases allowed under subparagraphs 1(a)(b), the sum of which shall be rounded off to the nearest dollar. Formula Base Rent) x (CPI -U%) Dollar Adjustment Amount of CPI Rent (CPI Adjustment) + (additional increases) • Rent Increase• (Rent Increase*) + (Case Rent) • New Pant *Round off to nearest dollar ((.01 - .49 • .00) (.50 - ,99 • 1.00) E %R e 0) x (,04755) • $9,50 (59.50) + ($5.00) • ')14.50 (rounded off to $15,00) (515.00) + ($200.00) • $215.00 6 a 0. No Adjustment Allowed: In the event an Owner attempts to increase without complying with the provisions of this Agreement, ouch an increase shall be deemed null and void, and residents shall not be required to pay such increase. -_ E. In the event the park residents' covaittee questions the validity of a rent increase request exceeding one hundred (x00%) of the- CPI, said + committee may request City to review said rent increase. Owner agrees to meet with City and residents' committee, and shall provide documentation explaining the validity of any rent request as provided herein. Said increase exceeding 100% of CPI shall not be valid until certified by City to be to compliance with agreement. 8. Yoluntar Vacenties. In addition to any other adjustments to rent allowed un er aragrap C) hereof, and notwithstanding the limitation providing for only one rental adjustment per year pursuant to Paragraph 7(8), an Omer shall be permitted to increase the monthly space rent upon a voluntary vacancy of the space by an amount equal to five percent (5f) of the base rent for the mobile home space prior to any voluntary vacancy. The rent on a particular space shall not be separately increased because of a voluntary vacancy more frequently than once in any wenty -four (24) month period. Formula 4 aRent) x (up to 5%) - Dollar Amount of Vacancy Increase `Vacancy Increase) + (Base Rent) - New Rent Exa ,e 2 0. 0) x (5f) - (10.90 610.00) + ($200.00) - $210.00 9. Discretion for Lower Ad astments. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requ r ng an mer to a ust rents each year or as preventing an Owner from adjusting rents to levels less than '.use herein allowed. 10. Responsibilities of Omer. A. Park Services: Owner agrees that during the term of this Agreement Omer shall furnish all of the facilities and utilities listed on Exhibit 'A- hereto to all eligible residents at no extra charge. Owner also agrees to provide and maintain in satisfactory working order and condition, during the term of this Agreement, all physical improvements and common facilities and areas within thn mobile home park which are listed on Exhibit OA" hereto. Owner shall also comply with all requirements set forth in the Mobile Rome Residency Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with the consent of City, Omer may reduce or eliminate a service within the mobile home park or to any resident which does not affect the health, safety and welfare of any resident, provided that a proportionate share of the cost savings resulting from such reduction or elimination 1s passed on to the residents in the form of a decrease In rent. If a mobile home park owner who provides utility services, reduces or eliminates such service by separate metering or other lawful means of transferring to the resident, the obligatio„ for payment for such services, the With respect to any concerns submitted in writingt by the residents committee to the Owner, the Owner shall provide a written response to the action items within twenty (20) days after tho meeting. 11. Rene otiation at Expiration of A reement. Within the six (6i month period prior to t e �ermrnat on of this Agreement, Owner and Cttr may renegotiate the terms of this Agre -went, 12. Remedies. A. City shall enforce the provisions of this Agrement on behalf of a resident or residents in the event of breach of or non - compliance with this Agreement by Owner. B. Any resident aggrieved by a breach of or ron- compliance with this Agreement by an Brener shall, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, have the right an such resident's own behalf to prosecute a civil action against Owner, in any court of competent jurisdiction, to enforce the provisions of this Agreement or recover damages for the breach hereof. 13. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. B. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall Inure to the benefit of the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each Owner. 8 s - r cost savings shzill be.deemed to be the cost of such transferred utility service for the twelve - (12)- months, prior to the installation and use of the metering :. - syatom. - r• For the purposes of this, section in determining cost savings to be tb passed on the resident In the, form of a decreased rent, the cost of installation of �•7 separate utility meters, or'similar costs to mobile home park maser to shift the obligation per payment of utility cost to the resident, shall not be canst ;red; ,• '- • B. Meeting with residents: The Owner shall ,meet ,upon reascnabie notice with the residents coaitt+e recognized by resolution of the City Council °• or as required by the Mebilehoee Residency Lair. There shall be a minimum of one, meeting per year to discuss general park welfare, or City and Conacnifty items of _ importance. The Amer or his autitrnrized representative shall also meet with the residents committee within thirty (30) days of a written request by the residents committee and prior to: - (1) alterations or deletions of amenities, services, or equipment; or (2) changes to the mobile bore park rules and regulations. _ With respect to any concerns submitted in writingt by the residents committee to the Owner, the Owner shall provide a written response to the action items within twenty (20) days after tho meeting. 11. Rene otiation at Expiration of A reement. Within the six (6i month period prior to t e �ermrnat on of this Agreement, Owner and Cttr may renegotiate the terms of this Agre -went, 12. Remedies. A. City shall enforce the provisions of this Agrement on behalf of a resident or residents in the event of breach of or non - compliance with this Agreement by Owner. B. Any resident aggrieved by a breach of or ron- compliance with this Agreement by an Brener shall, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, have the right an such resident's own behalf to prosecute a civil action against Owner, in any court of competent jurisdiction, to enforce the provisions of this Agreement or recover damages for the breach hereof. 13. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. B. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall Inure to the benefit of the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each Owner. 8 s - ".C. 4f any provision of this 'Agreement, or, the application thereof to Iv®r any person or circumstance is held to be unlawful,or,'fs otherwise invalidated -by' te final Judgment-of any court of competent Jurisdiction, 'such invalidity- shall 2, not affect other Provisions Or 8PPlicAtlons of this Agreement id;icli can' be implemented withoLt,the invalid provision or 'applicatio n' and to this end, the provisions of this Agreement are deemed to be severable. 'a. To the extent that the 'c`6ateit of this'Agreement im'roqu rev,,, the singular shall include the plural and the masculine, feminine and, neuter genders shall each include the'oth I E. Thts'Agreement may not b- altered, amended or i-evoked except•by an instrumenCin writing executed by City and all (2hmers. d IN WITNESS WHZREOF, the parties hereto have "executed this Agreement on the.. day and year first above written.- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: BY: Dennis L. Stout. Mayor i Beverly a et, City Clerk OWNER: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALTA LACUNA MOBILE HOME E , STATES BY: s r A Lily e Attarmayn' ALTA VISTA•MOBILE HORE,PARK BY!- CASA VOLAUTE MOBILE HWIE PARK BY: rHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK BY: FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR BY: THE PINES MOBILE ROME PARK BY: 7 RAMONA VILLA MOBILE HCME�PARK SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK BY: 9 • �r qll�mF7 _ 6 0 cJ ► �I1r. a� • � Ya r� don a � Liomm, sciy rrycIF % C RANCHO,CUCAMO' REDEVELOPMENTI� e AGENCYf.F-" V, R MENJ0RWNDUM,_-,v iF DAWS December 14, 1987 4 TO: Chair' nand Xembirs of the Redevelopment Agency V .- •'Q k FROM: Lauren- iiasseiman, Executive SUBJECT: School Dletrict Negotiations--, Zf_ Attached you will find copies of correspondence between the Redevelopment -Agency and the three .,school; districts �'of,- Central# Cucamonga and Etiwandas- resulting from a series 'bf meetings which began in Novqmber. 7 Agency staff had hoped, t- t t., -, result o,! -these meetings would be a list, of - financL' - `impacts ach of districts that- related 'directiq to the adeiOeldpme6t is - Pi an Amendment. As you can see, the district: are still' unab to provide the Agency with this information. Instead,' they have given us a "wish list" of projects 'Which -do not necessarily relate to the Plan Ameneaent. Additionally, the cost of these "impacts" has- , risen dramatically -- from $244 Killion for all five 1'school districts to over $857 Million for thp--c three districts alone. Agency staff has reiterated the Agency proposal to mitigate • any impact which relates directly to the Plan Amendment. However, given the information with which we have been supplied, it would be impossible to identify the nature and extent of those impacts. 7 IY 44, OR A NO I CRY OF John Costello, Superintendent Cucamonga School District 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California Gear John: Letter also smiled to: Frank Cosca Carlton Lightfoot bcc: City Council Jt"' rkmmn. —. _ J.ckL tan a !=I — • 9,a Oms av m7, a—" C,rw CAYri 917A neq M9d8J1 November 30, 1407 I appreciated the opportunity to meet with I= to see if Yhere is a possibility of working out a win /win solution to our differences on redevelopment. You have a commitment from me that the City staff will do its part to clarify the issues, and hopefully, arrive at a mutually agreeable solution which ue can recommend to our respective elected officials. 1 did want to take this opportunity to clarify two points which were raised to our discussion. The first relates to Section 33401 of the health and Safety Code, subsection A. We discussed the notation relating to proportionate share of funds being dispersed by the city to school districts. If you read the section, it 1s unclear to those of us who do not deal with the law on a regular basis. However, our city attorney has Indicated that this section applies only if the city redevelopment agency actually owns property that would otherwise 4 tax exempt. The agency In those Instances has the option of giving up i , tax exemption and paying the school districts a proportionate share of taxes which wouid have been received if the property were not tax except. In other words, that section 1% not appiicabl, to our situattcn since the redevelopment agency does not own any property. The second point I want to clarify related to the comments of Frank Cosca that any funds Mich were not going to a redevelopment agency would become part of the general Pond, and therefore, would be distributed at least .n part to the respective school districts. We are all aware that the state has reached its limitation in accordance with the Gann initiative of several years ago, so at the present Liam that money would simply be lost or would be returned to tax payers in some other form. In other words, the argument is not as relevant now, because tho State has reached its spending limit. A third point which we discussad related to the challenge of blight findings. In checking Int, the provisions of the law, we have noted that there is a sixty -day statute of lieltations on the finding of blight. That period has long passed. In addition, as I stated in our meeting, it is �.�..r, Dave,Lsea ChVIN 8,"a Fm Lwwe4a, lea sLiv a . •..,.•: = �, :MTh - - -�--- -- .- , -, a.- �v�x'Superintandentr3 s_ .k'.` ` +t Noi a r1 Oi`19e7��tiy >- 'i' = ^!i Page 6 °z ,},, r x' extremely oubt}ol, that, a n • ` y Rh`6our£_.1n� the State or Nation weld :uriderrtnes• -�.�. v - existing radevelopment".finaecing -bonds or other.meuures by,declaring`, i' . blight to be non- ezisUntxteng co■r1t■ents have beam` wde a1�d. °the;,= „afta�'finenclal; sixty -day liritatlen`Ms peeseE:.;; eThat', is,an'Argument'parMPs ±thatrour•. ; attorneys rill have, - to' sattle ;,but,I did.went %tofshtre ",point�of;viey.F 7n summary. I a■ eetoureoed:by;wr+ recent; meitlny :. „HOpafully.= weicaai•find some solution' which'repi_asents'Cwiddh groend for- both -:the school districts and the ndavalopaentapancr.,lk • aro'all in• 'the samebuslatsE s�rrlog; the , SM citizens.- 'wit9'1thcr!dicu=ntatIon.to be'}providod"�by. the; districts concerning the impact of,,the redevelopment project.on the school districts. we my be able to core to ?a solution:, As I indicated at our lunch.'our staff-wili be available to meet on short notice once you have assembled the necessary materials so we an ,rake an evaluation. Please contact me as soon as you -are ready to' meet or to discuss any issues related to finding a solution to our impasse. Slncers , re N. Wsserran ity liarager LNA:baa File: 0203 -06 RDA 4 �i s ,i P Markman & Arczynski One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. ' Re: Central School District v. Rancho ucwonga. a eva opmenc AxencY San Bernardino superior Court No. 43194 Dear Mr. Markman: Enclosed herewith is a list of requirements of rho Central School District for which partial funding is sought from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. You will note the estimated total cost of the projects to be $145,173,356. You should also note that the dollar amounts sought for these particular projects are over a substantial period of time. The specific new facilities needs are assumed over twenty yearn, the school reconstruction needs are assumed for the year 2012 and the vehicular needs are assumed tc be required through the next twenty years. Attached is a data sheet showing standardized costs. The data sheet has a growth estimate coat with a twenty year inflation rate based upon a five percent (5Z) inflationary factor per year over a twenty year period, for simplicity, the average cost as a median betwaun the present coat and the twenty year inflation coat. The total dollrr needs of the Central School District for capital outlay purposes greatly exceed the amount of sums which the school district could anticipate receiving from tax increments of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The Dintrtct is of the opinion, however, that a substantial amount of the Dietrict's needs should be received from tax increment funds. RECEIVED DEC a t481 :I .. i � t. -' IW.ONKFS � '• � PARKER AND COVERT A.N,M!'O •. ' - CAI.VIWHFA4.En !H STOU-SxT W '. IR1t [A51 tOUNIX St.iEI...SUlt E.2 AlE.L r•OO7 TI� 6VEKER E =ERT WRDAKIAC SILR aAWA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92705 - TELE.Mpa i9 "' `` _ -, CNARLE55 SMAIIICO VEIWAV 9AWLE. L TICNASARANELW Decembar 7, 1987 IIEF owne wCNE"I 0 ENOL91 I ' I)MW I ANDERSEN CE -101 CDNSTANCE 5 N.mnLL ' JDVATNANJ WIT Markman & Arczynski One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. ' Re: Central School District v. Rancho ucwonga. a eva opmenc AxencY San Bernardino superior Court No. 43194 Dear Mr. Markman: Enclosed herewith is a list of requirements of rho Central School District for which partial funding is sought from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. You will note the estimated total cost of the projects to be $145,173,356. You should also note that the dollar amounts sought for these particular projects are over a substantial period of time. The specific new facilities needs are assumed over twenty yearn, the school reconstruction needs are assumed for the year 2012 and the vehicular needs are assumed tc be required through the next twenty years. Attached is a data sheet showing standardized costs. The data sheet has a growth estimate coat with a twenty year inflation rate based upon a five percent (5Z) inflationary factor per year over a twenty year period, for simplicity, the average cost as a median betwaun the present coat and the twenty year inflation coat. The total dollrr needs of the Central School District for capital outlay purposes greatly exceed the amount of sums which the school district could anticipate receiving from tax increments of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The Dintrtct is of the opinion, however, that a substantial amount of the Dietrict's needs should be received from tax increment funds. RECEIVED DEC a t481 :I LA.00FICtS -PARKER AND COVERT{ .-.' Markman & Arczyniki Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. December 7, 1987 ? Page Two W This is particulail yr,true-when.a suistant-*'al- iiounG of, the impact on the.Diitrict is�'beingproduced,beci�se of a promotion of growth by the, Rancho _Cucaaznga,�Redqivelopme;t Agency. The Central -Sclfo'61 District believes their projected ected needs are coiseriFaii%ie cons idiri ng'- thi.amouni' of development that is'prejuied to occur within the'p6-tion,"Of the District within the city boundaries of the Hty�of Rancho Cucamonga. The school district does reiterate its dosire Co rece.ve fifty percent (50%) of the tsx incremant attributable to the tax rate of the Central Sthool'District within the Central School District's boundaries and within the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga School District. This amount does not appear to pv-oN,i a the shortfall for the funding needs, but would provide , iubstential share of the needed funds required by the Conical School District. In no event would the District seek funding from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in excess of its needs as set forth in the enclosed materials. This letter does constitute an offer of the Central School District to compromise the above-entitled litigation. We are available to meet with you regarding this matter in the immediate future. It is requested that copies of the enclosed material be forwarded to the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Very truly ycurs, 0, 10 to H. Parker CHP/pg2624 Enclosures cc: Dr. Frank A. Costs, Jr., Superintendent Central School District POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AC°NC1 PROJECTS SPECIFIC TO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DECEMBER 7, 1$87 v \�� Ex1e[in Conditions - pp ' Central School l) l District currrent,houses 3700 students in five elementary schools (2 p _ school. The entire District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We are or6sently awaiting funds from they state to complete an- eleoentary school- in, the hededaoned community of Terra Vista, Lewis Homes has p partial portable school and is committed to providing a is second. The District- caleorLNello- RooeaanggreementstatSince funding, i local the District is dependant upon state portable classrooms . developer fees are available unly.£or p _ The remainder is part of a local match that is given to the State of projacte, d_Growth - Central School Cietrict lbe District's master plan in the District will build-Out oislreached between the roximately 20008ando2010. reach a Reuired school overntheynextotwentyd one years. Additionally, existing facilities are in serious need of renovation or replacement. Based upon these facility needs oust the nexeetwentYBYearaowing capital one new l intermediates school rand i three pelementary y schools. Projected Coats: $ 28,313.962 e. Each Intermediate School $ 10,959,893 b. Each Elementary School ,to--I x 28,313,962 28,313,962 Total - ntarmedi S 32 879 679 Total Elementary - -3 x 10,959,893 TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS 2 District Education Center (30,000 tq.ft) $ 1,369,990 Land 5 acres x $273,998 - 6,870,000 30,000 eq.fC. x. $229 per aq.ft. $ 1 193 983 Furniture & Equipment TOTAL COST =o d + POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT.AGF.NCY•PROJECTS SPECIFIC•TO XENTRAL•Sr,R00L DISTRICT December 7, 1987• -'- _ •- Page Two 3. warehouse (20,000 sq.ft.) Land 5 acres x $273,998 $ 1,369,990_ 20,000 sq.ft. x $92 per sq.ft.' S 1840 000 TOTAL COST 3i209,996= 4. Transportation /Maintenence Facility (5,000 sq.ft.) Land 5 acres x•$273,998 $$ 1,369,990 5,000 sq.ft. x $92 sq.ft.-- $ 460000 TOTAL $ 1'629'99U 5. School Reconstruction - Schools betweon'the ages of 20 and 30 years require capital expenditures to replace roofs, heating, and air conditioning units, playground and parking areas, floor coverings, furniture plumbing bulletin fixtures, lighting fixtures, chalkboards, boards, computer labs, etc. Reconstruction costs are based upon .50 of the replacement coat over a 25 -year period applying a five percent annual inflation adjustment Ligure. Year 2012 Age eneZr T Elementary School Years Vallu Vista Elementary School 54 Years Cucamonga Junior High School 51 "care DonL Merced Elemantary School 33 Years Bear Gulch Elementary School 28 Yeare I Intermediate x $18 624,652 $ 18,624,952 4 Elementary x $6,771,709 - $ 27,090,836 22 Portable Classrooms Per School x $16,932 x 6 Schools $_ 2,2233500,24 TOTAL COST $ 41,950,a 1'1 6 Service Vehicle Acquisition - At build -out it is estimated that there will be approximately p schools located in the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga. The District will need approximately 14 service vehicles. 14 Vehicles x $27,400 - $ 14 Vehicles Replacement x $27,400 383 600 TOTAL COST $ /e /,[uu ;" J A ;rid 0 W, W POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECT— SPECIFIC TO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT December 7, 1987 Page Three 7. Present schools in Central School District do not meet p esent facility standards. The elemente.ty and junior high schools do not have multi -media Penters, nor do they have cafeterias. The junior high school does not have a gymnasium, nor a track. These are all common facilities in California schools. School Renovation ementary La eteries $ 2,324,000 - 1 Junior High Cafeteria $ 1,660,000 4 Media Centers $ 5,312,000 1 Gymnasium $ 2,656,000 Track 1 Track $ 677,270 Grounds Renovation $ 2,709,080 Completion of Bear Gulch to •- Present Standards $ 517 400 "75U TOTAL COST 333 8. Increased development in Rancho Cucamonga will increase enrollment. Along with that, the single working growing number of parents and families in which both parents are emplo -ed necessitates child care before, during and after 'school. The District will need to provide day care facilities. Da Care Filiti es ac0P aci t Ii e sq.ft. x $274 per sq.ft. - $ 4,932,000 9. Total All Capital Projects 1 -8 a. New Schools $ 61,193,641 b. District Education Center $ 9,433,973 C. WErehouse $ 3,209,990 d. 7 ansportation /Maintenance $ 1,829,990 e. Reconstruction $ 47,950,812 f Service Vehicles $ 767,200 g Renovation $ 15,855,/50 h. Day Cara Facilities $_ 41932,000 TOTAL ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS NOTE: These figures do not include the cost of finsocing, which would mean that over a twenty -year period, they may double. I ?,' -DATA SHEET -- CAPITAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT r ,s • The cost cnalysit,for schools and other capital olpenditures is bleed .upoi current and projected costslutiltzinq a five percent inflation factor over 20 -Year loo period. Fallowing `are specific costa related to specific types "`o; capital projects: u 1. TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT ESTIMATED 20 -YEAR 9.VERAOE - COSTS 'INFLATION COST- ' i Lead $150,000 per Aare t 397,995 x 273,998 -• m„ 4�. -' Z. Elementary School t Land 10 Acres $1.5 M 9 3,979,947 ,y. Construction Cost 4.0 M 10,613,191 Furniture L Equipmont .5 It 1,,326.648 °- TOTAL COST 6.0 M $15,91P,786 SI0,959,093 k +� 3. intermediate School Land 20 Acres S 3.0 M x 7,129,893 _ Construction 11.0 M 29,186,275 Furniture 1, Equipment 1.5 M 3.979.947 TOTAL CCST 15.5 M 141,126,115 128.313,062 District Education :enter, warehouse and transportatian /maintenance facilities based on a 10,000 ADA District. TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS 20 -YEAR AVERAGE INFLATION COST 4. District Ed Center Per sq. it. cost $125 per sq. ft. 9332 $229 Land 10 Acres $ 1.5 M $ 3,979,94: Const. 30,000 sq. 42. 3.75 M 9,949,B66 Furniture G Equipment .75 M 1.989.973 TOTAL COST 6.6 11 $ 15,914,706 $10,959,8P3 5. Warehouse Pwr sq. ft. cost 9 50 per sq. ft. $133 $92 Land 5 Acres 9 750,000 $1,369,990 20,001) sq. ft. 9 •.0 M x 2,653.290 1.826.649 TOTAL :OST $ 1.0 M 63.196,639 6. Transp./Malnt Facility Per sq. it cost 9 50 per sq. ft. $133 $92 Land 5 cres 750,000 $1.369.990 3,000 sq. ft. 250,000 663,324 9 456.662 TOTAL COS" $1,000,000 s 633,324 $1,826,652 i SHEET' .Page Two �i T_ Vah',clv AcquI Ition (10,000 ADA District with 13 schools: czy� -service approximately five service vice vehicles for avary,4our schools plus� one fooc,, service vehicle plus'`one three-ton truck.) - - TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS 20-YEAR AVERAGE INFLATION COST COSTS IB Vehicles x 515,000 per Vohicla -S 15,000 s 39,800 X -27,400 -TOTAL COST Ii 270,000 t 714,390 *493,175 School Reconstruction (Schools bctwean the ages of 20 and 30 yiars require capital expenditures to replace•roofs, heating and 'air ceindiflon! - ng units.-' 11 playground and parking areas, floor coverings, iurnit6rvs.plitmblng fixtures,:. lighting fixtur6st chalkboards, bullotin boardst computer '?&bs#- - etc.� Peconstruction costs are 'based upon .50 of thq�rvplacemirnt cost'over a-, • 25-yeAr period applying a five percent annual inflation ad.iustment-figure.).; TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT REPLACEMENT CURRENT 25-YF4R COST RECONSTRUCTION IW-LATION COST ADJUSTMENT Elementary School S 4.0 M $2.0 M S 6,772,709 Intermediate School 11.0 M 5.5 M 18,624,952 I ' 8776 Archibald Avanua Rancho Cucamonga Caldomis 917364698 (7141987.8942 Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga` P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamnga, CA 91730 -0807 _ Dear Lauren: 14' 4 Enclosed is the information that we discussed at our lunch meeting on November 25th. If I can answer any Questions regarding the data provided, please don't hesitate to contact me. I look forward to hearing from you. Sin rely, 4G(i(/tiO n F. Costello, Ed. D. Jperintendgnt December 9, 1987 DAVID CWIEGA, .- LORAIHE 1' cMUMN JULIAN RD=N - -- A7Hli F. COS1ElLO. Fn,b. Su�anntmdant - - Enclosure Where Successful Learning Ha; m i c� J RE8_lbED CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ADMINISTRATION Capital Facility Projects To a Mitigate Redevelopment Agency DEC 09 1987 i Plan fcr Project Area f 713i�1�iitQl3ya'�18 A. ENROLLMENT GROWTH 1 To acconmodate the expected increase of new students as a result of new % residential, commercial and industrial development, the Cucamonga School District will have to build new schools and expand present schools. The 7c1 District Mister Plan developed with data from the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has the district's enrollment at build out of approximately 6,378 students between the years 2000 -2015. Based on this data, the district projects the - following Capital Facility:needs over the next 20 years. Cost estimates are adjusted for these projects to account for inflationary increases in land and construction costs. r. r1. New schools for 3,977 elementary students w !?� 7 Elementary x 10,959,893 • 76,719,251 2. Second wing for 700 junior high students 1 Junior High wing x 19,819,773 19.819,773 k 3. warehouse 30,000 sq. ft. x $92.00 • 2,760,000 4. Transportation /Maintenance Facility 5,000 sq. ft. x $92.00 • 460,000 5. District Office 30,000 sq. ft. x $229.00 6,870,000 Furniture and Equipment 650,000 6. Media Centers for existing schools 3 x 4,000 sq. ft. x $332.00 = 2,656,000 7. Gym for Junior high School 8,000 sq. ft, x $332.00 • 2,656,000 8. Track for Junior High School 1/4 mile track • 677,270 9. cafeteria for Junior High School 5,000 sq. ft. x $332.00 • 1,660,000 10. Permanent replacement classrooms for Los Amigos 15 classrooms x 960 sq. ft, x S274.00 • 3,945.5('0 J s i h, yep• a. 11. Expand core facilities at existing schools _- Los Amigos 3,000 sq. ft, x $274.00 • 822,000 Cucamonga 3,00f-.sq. ft. x $274.00 • 822,000 School Reconstruction 7,649,259 12. Ex;,and Junior High Schnol,Site Service dehieles 5 arees x $268,974.00,- 1,344,870 P. SCHCOL RECONSTRUCTION 609,030 Existing schoots.wl)1 need scAOOI r; construction fo;.eplaee'roofs, P-^etins and air conditioning units'; 013yg -round and ;•arW2 areas, furniture, pluabing fixtures, lighting fixtures, chalkboards, floor coY +rings;' -- bulletin;bcards, computer tabs, etc. Reconstruction costs -are based upon .50 of the replacement cast over a 25 year period - applying a five percen, anndal figure. inflation adjustment Los Amigos (present age "29 'years) 2,100,000 Cucamonga (present age 30 years).- 2,100,000 Rancho (present age 13 years) • 3,259,479 Temporary Housing for reconstruction 10 classrooms x 5,000 x 2 schools • 100,00 10 classrooms x 8,S79,4 1 school 89,790 C. SERVICE VEHICLE ACQUISITION To accommodate the existing schools and proposed schools at build out the district will need 15 service vehicles. 15 vehltles x $27,400 - 411,000 15 replacement vehicles in 10 years x $27,400 • 411,000 D• COM1UNITY USE OF FACILITIES Improve and update 3 fields x $20,000 • 600,000 E. DAY CARE FACILITIES To accommodate oui increased enrollment end the increased number of single parent and both working parent families w11ch requ) -e child rare before. during and after school. The !'strict will need: 8 facilities 2,003 sq. ft, x $274 4,384,000 F. CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS SMMY 1 Enrollment Growtt :123,190,164 2. School Reconstruction 7,649,259 3. Service dehieles 822,000 4. &,&unity Use 609,030 5. Day Care Faciliti ?s 4 386 10 Mg'g7Ib 033 i I 0; The above cited pr_ojv"c'tiT.do not"include the cost for-) ong tern iin'incM9 of the projects., btillzing if*typfcal 20,year, CqrIllicites of Participation.; Financing Progra'm mW1 nciiase the total'i�o n needed by IM '- 250Z (le a $5.000,000 project with financing cost-would reilujre a total amount of $8,750.000 to $12,500,,(T), Therefore to finance a71' the projects ldc-,Itifled'would require $239,130.558 to $341,615.083. Markman 6 Arctyneki One Civic Center Circle Brea, Californic 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. v. Rancho Re: Etiwanda School Dietriet ucemon a e eve opmanc gent an ernar .no uper or ours No. 43193 Dear Mr. Markman: Enclosed herewith is a list of requirements of the Etiwanda School District for which partial ndingois�illght from the Rancho Cucamonga Redeveloppment Agency. note the estimated total cost of the projects to be Wu, 773,511. You should nlso note that the dollar amounts eeug6ht for these particular projects are over a substantial varied of time. The 'lecific new facilities needs are assumed over twenty yearn, the school reconstruction needs are for the r end are years. Attached is a data sheet showing standardized costs- Tit data inflation hate based Iuponta f ivempercentt (5%)i]in!lationar ar y theto-stage costoasraa edianybetweenethedpresenticostcand, tile twenty year inflation cost. The total dollar needs of the Eerceedat School District for capital Outlay pure greatly amount of sums which the R:hool district could anticipate receiving from tnx increments of the Rancho cucamnnga Redevelopment Ageucy 'he District is of the opinion, however, that a s at amount of the enti unit's needs should be .In tant RECEIVEU- ' 319V ,,, LAW OFMS PARKER AND COVERT •rwn.ss +anwEUO.�.m+wew CLAYTON" V~P 1901 EAST ,OUR1N ElREET 6Un( ]11 Ap(�COx TlF WEKZaE COY( .T SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA 93705 TEEE/.TONE 97}(.37 ,JARCATtlT A CKOESTER CHARDS S SCO 140 yfpNA / 9ROU E. MI OUR ME L 7, 1997 CNLtLE lftao9�' ,T.aEEEEOfNSI.y. December ROOEAT T AAOEMN ET -106 C,,WANCE 5 NCXIL. JONAIMM J UOTT MCNEEEE NCIODU WFU'.FR Markman 6 Arctyneki One Civic Center Circle Brea, Californic 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. v. Rancho Re: Etiwanda School Dietriet ucemon a e eve opmanc gent an ernar .no uper or ours No. 43193 Dear Mr. Markman: Enclosed herewith is a list of requirements of the Etiwanda School District for which partial ndingois�illght from the Rancho Cucamonga Redeveloppment Agency. note the estimated total cost of the projects to be Wu, 773,511. You should nlso note that the dollar amounts eeug6ht for these particular projects are over a substantial varied of time. The 'lecific new facilities needs are assumed over twenty yearn, the school reconstruction needs are for the r end are years. Attached is a data sheet showing standardized costs- Tit data inflation hate based Iuponta f ivempercentt (5%)i]in!lationar ar y theto-stage costoasraa edianybetweenethedpresenticostcand, tile twenty year inflation cost. The total dollar needs of the Eerceedat School District for capital Outlay pure greatly amount of sums which the R:hool district could anticipate receiving from tnx increments of the Rancho cucamnnga Redevelopment Ageucy 'he District is of the opinion, however, that a s at amount of the enti unit's needs should be .In tant RECEIVEU- ' 319V ,,, LA. OF$Kt5 PARHER AND COVERT Markman 6 Arczynski Attcntion: James L. Markman, Esq. December 7, 1987 Page Two This is particularly true when a substantial amount of the impact on the District is being produced because of a promotion of growth by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The Etiwanda School District believes their projected needs are conservative considering the amount of development that is presumed to cccur within the portioe of the District within the city boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Also attached is the total estimated income during thie period of time, excluding, however, income from the Redevelopment Agency. Again, the estimated income shows an average income. This income assumes that the developer fees which were authorized by the 1986 Legislature and the special taxes authorized by the voters within the Etiwandu School District will stay in place, again having an inflationary factov apply to both. The school district does reiterate its desieo to receive fifty percent (50%) of the tax increment attributable to the tax rate of the Etiwands School District within the Etiwanda School District's boundaries and within the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga Schonl District. This amount does not a pear to provide the shortfall for the funding needs, but would provide a substantial share of the needed funds required by the Etiwanda Uchool District. In no event would the District seek funding from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in excess of its needs as set forth in the anclosad materials. This letter does constitute an offer of the Etiwanda School District to compromise the above - entitled litigation. Ile are available to meet with you regarding this matter in the immediate future. It is requested that copies of the enclosed material be forwarded to the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Very truly -ours, C1 'ton H. jr Park C9P /pg2642 Enclosures cc Dr. Carleton P. Lightfoot, Superintendent Etiwanda School District IOTERIIAZ RZDKnWPMEVI' ACEMCT, PROJECTS SPECIFIC TO `i ETIVAHDA SQ100L DISTRICT, DECEMBM 7, 1987 Existing Conditions Currently the Etivands School District tounes 1,300 students in. two elementary schools and one intermediate school. All are located In ,the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The district is in the process of building a third elementary school !h the Vintage Homes tract, north of Highland and vast of Milliken Avenue, which ✓.ill open In. September, 1988: A fourth elementary 2-- school will be constructed during the )988 -89 school year In the Heritage • Homes, located in the city of Fontana. Financing for the new schools has been yi provided through developer fan and Hello -Roof sgreanants. Fro ectad Crowtb•— Etiwnla School Distrlet Approximately seventy pateent•of the Etlwands School District is located within the city boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga and thirty percent In the city of Fontana. According to the District Master Plan, tha district will reach build out somewhere between the yur- 2000 -2010. At that tie; the district will serve approximately 25,000 students. Seventy percent of the students, k 17,300, will reside in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, It is estimated that the dietrict can adequately house 2,070 of chase students l;eving 15,430 students unhouced. Based upon this data, the district projects the following capital facility needs over the next 20 years: 1. 15,430 students will require eppr schools and 15.5 elamentsr; schools. Projected Coate- s. Each Intermediate School b. Each Elemeutary School Total Intermediate, S x 26,313,962 Total Elementary, 15.5 x 10,959,893 TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS >xiaately five now intermediate $ 28,313,962 $ 10,959,993 $141,565,310 $169 878 342 $ 11 2. Additions to District Education Center (46,000 sq. ft.) 46,000 sq. ft. x $229 per sq. ft. S 10,534,000 Furniture 6 EOuipment $ 1 000 000 TOTAL COST 5 11 3 warehouse (40,C00 sq. ft.) Land 5 Acres x $273,998 - $ 1,369,990 40,000 sq. ft x $92.00 sq. ft. S 3 690 000 TOTAL COST i 5,049"990 4. Transportation /Maintenance Facility (5,000 sq. ft.) ,....d 5 Acres x $'73,998 - S 1,369,990 5,000 sq. `t. x $92.00 sq. ft. S 460 000 TOTAL $ 1.529,990 sue: M: vS • � rC' — aR.iu+' �vY `y6..�� j',Ii frD ° . _ . • • vN i -r FOTEiffIAL 1tIDRFEIAPMERT Af:RMC! ItWLCTS SPECIFIC TO ETIVAIDA SCHOOL, DISTRICT ,.� Oaccaber 7, 1987 _- F. Psge Tvo 5. School Reconstruction -- Schools between the ages of 20 and 30 years require capital expenditures to replace roofs, heating and; air conditioning units, playground and parking areas, floor coverings, furniture, plumbing .,fixtures, lighting fixtures, chalkboards. bulletin boards, computer labs.,cte. Ree,astruction coots ate bases. upon .50 of the replacement• cost over , 15 -year period applying a .- five percent annual inflation adjustment figure. Year 2012 _tge- Sumit flesentary School 45 Tears " Ettwanda Intermediate School 77 Years , Windrows Elementary School 25 Years ' Caryn Eleas..tary School 24 Years I Intermedlate x $18,624,652 S 18,624,952 3 ElwAantary x $6,772,709 f 20j318tt�127, . - TOTAL .AST t-38,943,079 6. Service Vehicle Acquisition--At build cut it is estimated thst there will be approximately 24 schools located in the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga. The district will need approximately 36 service vehicles. 36 Vehicles x $27,400 - $ 986,400 36 Vehicles Replacement x $27,400 TOTAL COST $ 986 400 i , 72,e00 7. Total All Capital ProJecta 1 -6 a. New Schools $311,443,n52 b. District Education Center $ 11,534,000 c. Warehous4 $ 5,049,990 d. Transportation /Maintenance $ 1,829,990 e. Reconstruction $ 38,943,079 f. Service Vehicles $ 1,972,800 TOTAL $370,773,511 a !W Jp y F 0 . t lip {iL�` A S RI '-_ TOTAL gfT11LLiLD IHCDAZ - 31 n gg� -- A. (•evelopec Peee "'f1.03 per sq• ft. - B. Override Tex 61,600 per duelling unit, adjusted annually plus 5. 4 inflation factor << C. Eased upon 30,OOO.duslliag units over the next 20 Testa. 3, 1• Averaga dwelling unit Lire 1,200 aq• ft. " 2. 1,300 hoses per yeit • "i ' Developer Perms Annual _ - tt. 11800,000 sq• ft' �1 4C> 1,500 Hoses x 1,200 sq• 1,800,000 sq. ft. x f1.03 sq. ft. ;1,834,000 1k�; Tex Override Annual - 1,500 Hoses x $1,600 $2.400,000 ?t -'- Tote, Annual - ;4,254,000 y Davelo er Pena 20- Kear gst,mata ^+ - 20 x ;1,854,000 - $37,080,000 '' Tsx Override 20 -year estimate with 52 inflation factor Range Low High 1,600 4,245 (1) 2,400,000 (11) 3,909,347 (12) 4,104,814 (2) 2,320,000 (13) 4,310,055 (3) 2,646,000 (14) 4,525,5$7 (4) 2,778,300 (15) 4,751,835 ,. (5) 2,917,215 (It) 4,989,427 (6) 3.063,076 (17) 5,230,899 (7) 3,216,229 (18) 5,500,843 (8) 3,377,041 (19) 5,775,886 t (9) 3,545,893 (20) 6,064 660 (30) 3 723.187 TOTAL $79,3 8,284 • 30,186,`141 $ 37,080,000 Total Developer Pees 7p 358,284 Tax override $116,438,284 total all eouscea A S RI • DATA SHEET= CAPITAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 6 . The cost analysis for schools and other Capital expenditures is bee d current and projected costs utilizing a five percent inflation factor over 20 -year period. Following are specific costs related to 'specific "%types capital projects& 1. TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT ESTIMATED 20 -YEAR AVERAGE f: COSTS INFLATION COST r, - Legd $150,000 per Acre S 347,995 t 273 ,578 mot' 2. Elementary School x Land 10 Acres $1.5 M t 3,979,947 Construction Cost 4.0 M 10,613,191 Furniture & Equipment .5 M 1.326.649 TOTAL COST 6.0 M $15,919,786 *10.959,893 7 t 3. Intermediate School - Land 20 Acres t 3.0 M t 7,959,893 Construction 11.0 M 29,186,275 • n. Furniture & Equipment 1.5 M 3,979.947 t TOTAL COST 15.5 H $41,126,115 $28,313,062 S' District Education Center, warehouse and transportationtmaintenance facilities based on a 10,000 ADA District. l' TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS 20 -YEAR AVERAGE INFLATION COST 4. District Ed Center Per sq. ft. cost $125 per sq. ft. $332 $229 Land 10 Acres $ 1.5 M t 3,979,947 Const. 30,000 aq. ft. 3.75 M 9,949,866 Furniture & Equipment .75 M 1.489.973 TOTAL COST 6.0 M it :5,919,786 $10,939,893 S. Warehouse Per sq. ft. cost S 50 per sq. ft. $133 s92 Lard 5 Acres t 750,OA0 $1,369,990 20,000 sq. ft. $ 1 0 M S 2,653.290 1.826.649 TOTAL COST t 1.0 M $3.196,639 6. Transi Maint. Facility Per sq. ft. cost s 50 per sq. it. $133 $92 Land 5 Acres 750,000 $1.369.990 5,000 sq. ft. ZSO.00,Q 663,324 t 456.662 TOTAL COST $1,000,000 0 633,324 $1,826,632 J6 i• rr I - �a- :'t':,ki,: ,Y�tti.4'1i'-- "a?';.- ]?L`, ^'- .�..x!. ^ -J � a'�•' i �_• -." �� . •:- - -• - '� - _ j.'_ E >-r. =4 >.iz„ .,Page T Tao � a an+ euuarnwA+ icon,.. LZ 7. Service Vehicle Acquisition (10,000 ADA D District w with 13 schools an approximately five service vehicles for every four schools plus one foo service vellcle P Plus•one three -ton truck.) v' T TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS 20-YEAR AVERACC INFLATION COST COSTS 18 Vehicles x i $ $13,000 Par Vehicle E 15,000 t 39,800 $ 27,400 TOTAL COST t 270,000 g g, 716,390 0493,193 d. School Reconstruction (Schools between the ages o of 20 and 30 y expenditures to replace roofs, heating a years require ^' l floor coverings, f furniture, Plumbing ffxtures4 Reconstruction costs are bawd upon _ boards, computer labs, etc. _.50 o rho replacement cost "over a {= T TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT REPLACEMENT C CURRENT�28 - ;y C COST R -YEAR LOST ADJUSTMENT Elementary 6chcal S 4.0 M $ Intermediate School 11.0 M ; $2.0 M NE . xs Letter; also mailed to: John Costello Carlton Lightfoot `s RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Moms a W.n,d,C,„"° .C�Wb'OM4 1931 December 15, 19e7 Dr. Frank Cosca Central School District 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Dr. Conca: I have received a letter from your attorney pertaining to school facilities projects neu.Sed by your school district. While the letter was very interesting, I was very disappointed in the content, sines it does not address the issues to you in at letter udated November 30, later 1987. The letter from your attorney, clayton Parker, is a wesreachedtanfimpas esame n negotiationscearlier in he year is, the district desires to receive SOt of the tax Increment attributahle to Central School District within the Project Area. I had hoped, after our last meeting, that we were begone that point. I find it very frustrating to be working through these old arguments again. I want to make very clear that the Redevelopment Agency is more than willing to mitigate any impact on the school districts which are a result of `he Redevelopment Plan Amendment 170. 1. However, the projects which your attorney to has sulied redevelopment to They are, in d facto merely ral list p Of all projected needs releting to the ultimate growth of your district. As we have stated before, in order to justify any payments to the school districts, we must be able to quantify the impacts that relate direct, to the Plan on funding "t of Y a the project, is beings o o sought tliat which is apparently unrelated to the 50% figure. Additionally I find the figures suggested as projects' costs to be incredible. Your own consultant examined the five school districts' needs and determined that the total for all five was only about $244 Million. You will recall that thse figures e the time nof the amendment. inHowever, public h new figures d Etiwan supplied Central, Cucamonga An t ti RE , v, - 4 �rncqed any further In order for us to, in negotiations, it will be neccesacy. for 0 to:, provide us with detailed, information on financial Ya;acts,'to the district'that relate dir tl to":the Redevefoment- Plan Amendment No.-'I=—By ec Y this, -1 do no mean were ly a jLst,,of desired projects and, costs like the one supplied by'yC1urattornsy.,1--- If you wish to discuss thie-matter furtheri,please.call me. We firmly that this issue can be resolved only - through rational- 'and-- professional basss-for discussion. Arbitrary approaches provido no'opportunity'for an',q q ultable - settlement. Sincerely. Lauren M. WauserLwn City Manager L- �x r ' CR M U REDEVE Q TAGECY, . MEMORANDiJ1d1 s DATES December'14# 1907 ,poi Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency la4 PRO14s Lauren M. Wasserman(�ti Executive Director SUBJECT: school District Negotiations Redevelopment will find nd ithe three school c d! between t acts the of Redevalo ant Agency m : stings began ninENovember.resulting from a aeries Of m etings which Agency statf had hoped than the res=�It of these meetings_• would be a list of finah,ial impacts on each of the districts that related directly to the Aadaa still ant Plan Amendment. As you ca with this information- to to provide the Agenc ,i liar.• of projects which do not have given us a have necessarily slate to rho Plan Amendment. Additionally. the cost Of rheas for all has risen dramatically -- from $246 Million for all five school districts co over $857 Million for these three districts alone. Agency staff has reiterated the Agency proposal co mitigate any impact given the linlormation directly which plan we have been to the However, supplied, it would be impossible with h which the nature an extenc of those impacts. ', ,n 'P ,I EL_`� J> F - Letter also nwiled to: Frank Cosca Carlton Lightfoot bcc: City Council �- �- .I 8rkmaa_... rte-- J ck La C.RY OP RANCHO (UCAAIONOA w7, a d. o,.,�,, C,manm nno, nul rsa.iui November 30, 1987 John Costello, Superintendent Cucamonga School District 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear John: I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you to see if there is a possibility of working out a win /win solution to our differences on redevelopment. You have s commttaent frc■ me that the City staff will do its part to -larify the issues, and hopefully, arrive at a mutually agroaable solution which we can recommend to our respective elected officials. I did want to take this opportunity to clarify two points which were raised I" our d::ceSSian. The first relates to Section 33101 of the Health and Safety Code, subsection A. We discussed the notation relati,.! to proportionate share of funds being dispersed by the city to school districts. If you read the section, it 1s unclear to those of us who do not deal with the law on a regular basis. However, Cur city attorney has Indicated that this Section applies only if the city redsvelopawnt agency actually owns property that would otherwise be tax exempt, fie agency in those instances has the option of giving up its tax exemption and paying the school districts a proportionate share of taxes which would have been received if the property ware not tax exempt. In other words, that section is not appTicable to our situation since the redevelopment agency does not own any property. The second point I want to clarify related to the cosments of Frank Cosca that any funds which were not going to a redaveloPwnt agency would become pert Of the goneral fund, and therefore, would I•a distributed at least in part to the respective school districts. We are all aware that the state has reached its limitation in accordance with the Gann initiative of several 9 tars ago, so at the present time that money e:vld simply be lost or would returned to tax payers in some other form. In words, the argument i not as relevant now, because the State has reached Its %pending limit. A third point which we discussed related to the challenge of blight findings. In checking into the provisions of the law, we have noted that there Is a sixty -day statute of limitations on the finding of blight. That period has long passed. In addition, as I stated in our meeting, it is D,m4L Smug chu 1. 11119M 11119M It PMOULIVV W 11119M it ro„e A'r,ar i MEN, - 111 e, '•$U ! t4nt :- 4',4v_±ro-'5�VkVa . :D1: -:. ,r.;:i• -rr n. K; y. ;re�•r, .' _ p r t3'd� e`n�f19:g1 .r ?r•. �>• � j� ' Wi n:- : r 'f. ��; ., • .. -- - •G:R . ,- ... e.4.,,..,:s . r.: XT, November Novesier _i. -- �, ."�?•t�"_ �- `'� extremely doubtop that.iro* eourt, In the to or Nation would' undeimin.,; s ,•? existing ndevelopwv�t flnaneing'boRd�s orotMP'Miwres•bydeclarinj blight.. to be non- axistant- lang' often- finarlital{`rAamit 4nithavasbean -ode and?thr',%` ; sixty -day 11e1tatlon�-%l.i�s� attorneys will have to'vpespdu; ;';, �ltlat,+dis;rx aguent- erhps:,`vbtwat : og ►nt yshati•q'polnt•uf:, ur•, ?� .Y In summary, I as encouriyrJ= bYour'reeen4;iiii�t /ng.: itipefylll' ein f1M n sass solution rhteh'rapnia�ts,Y slddl� greun$•for,both the sek6i;dlst�!ets and the ndewiopretVgene):.•Ye.an' all in' tha`saii':bustnesilservingahe .-. ; same citizens. •Wth,the?-d%� Wftntation to'bilpravided - by the ;disLrlets concerning the i*ct of the �Mewloprnt Drojact:on; the schaohdtstrlcts, w may be able to come to3a,solitioW; As I indicated it our lunbh, our steff will be available to Beet on short" 1 notice once YOU have assembled thkV ;necesiary materials so we can'4rke an evaluation. Pie's* contact St ae4sxn es yov'are' ready 'to most or to' discuss any issues related to finding 'a solution to our impasse. Since A, a ityN.Wasserman Nanegir LIH:baa File: 0203 -06 RDA 4 ., o r :V 4 4' ` {f Markman 4 Arczynski One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. Re: Central School District v. lUncho ucamon a Redevelo went enc an Bernardino Superior ourt No. 43194 Dear Hr. Markman: Enclosed herewith is a list of requirements of the Central School District for which partial funding is sought from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. You will not3 the estimated total coat of the projects to be $145,173,356. You should also note that the dollar, amounts sought for these particular pro,lects are over a substantial period of time. The specific new facilities needs are eesumod over twenty years, tha school reconstruction needs are assumed for the year 2012 .nd the vehicular needs are assumed to oe required through the next twenty yoart Attached is a data sheet showing standardized costa The data eh "- ha• a gr uth estimat•5 cot Jiei - twenty y.sr '.reflation cute baoed upon a fivo pa.cr.t (3£) inilationar•• factor per year over a twenty year par-ow, for simplicity, the average cost as a median betw,en the present coat and the twenty year inflation coat. The total dollar needs of the Central School District for capital outlay purposes greatly exceed the amount of sums which the school district could anticipate receiving from ta., increments of the Rancho Cucanonga Redevelopment Agency. The District is of the opinion, however, that a substantial amount of the District's needs should be received from tax increment funds. RECEIVEDDEC 81987 EAWOIFCIS PARKER AND COVERT CLAVTO„N EAAIEA ArMAArAI�n ML.E,YONAI G)AIR.tpA _ SnNCEAE MEAT ImIEASTMAfKVAEIT SNlElli ANEACOOETI, AIAAGAAEI A CN 51E0 SANTA ANA CALIrGSNIA 92705 TaEANONE fn n)• CNAAAES S SCOUSICO KANAA AAOULE, LVI LAAtI0LLf December 7, 1987 AE, neraf G E AOURI I ANOEAwr CONSTANCE 5 NCAEu CE -101 1ON11NAN I ..OTT AAO.a4E NCOLLE WAWA Markman 4 Arczynski One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. Re: Central School District v. lUncho ucamon a Redevelo went enc an Bernardino Superior ourt No. 43194 Dear Hr. Markman: Enclosed herewith is a list of requirements of the Central School District for which partial funding is sought from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. You will not3 the estimated total coat of the projects to be $145,173,356. You should also note that the dollar, amounts sought for these particular pro,lects are over a substantial period of time. The specific new facilities needs are eesumod over twenty years, tha school reconstruction needs are assumed for the year 2012 .nd the vehicular needs are assumed to oe required through the next twenty yoart Attached is a data sheet showing standardized costa The data eh "- ha• a gr uth estimat•5 cot Jiei - twenty y.sr '.reflation cute baoed upon a fivo pa.cr.t (3£) inilationar•• factor per year over a twenty year par-ow, for simplicity, the average cost as a median betw,en the present coat and the twenty year inflation coat. The total dollar needs of the Central School District for capital outlay purposes greatly exceed the amount of sums which the school district could anticipate receiving from ta., increments of the Rancho Cucanonga Redevelopment Agency. The District is of the opinion, however, that a substantial amount of the District's needs should be received from tax increment funds. RECEIVEDDEC 81987 ,.worntts Z PARKER AND COVERT :t? Markman 6 Arczynski Attention: James L. Harkmen, Esq. Decnmber 7, 1487 Page Two This is particularly true when a substantial amount of the impact on the District is being produced because of a promotion of growth by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The Central School District believes their projected needs are conservative considering the amount of development that is presumed to occur within the portion of the District within the city boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. , The school district does re!terate its desire to �i receive fifty percent (501) of the tax increment attributable to the tax rate of the Central School. District within the Central School District's boundaries and within the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga School District. " This amount does not appear to provide the shortfall for the .unding needs, but would provide a substantial share of the needed funds required by the Central School District. In no event would the District seek funding from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency to excess of its needs as set forth in the enclosed materials. This letter does constitute an offer of the Central School District to compromise the above - entitled litigation. He are available to meet with you regarding this matter in the immediate future. It is requested that copies of the enclosed material be forwarded to the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Very truly yours, 1 to , H. Parker CHP /pg2624 enclosures cc: Dr. Frank A. Cosca, Jr., Superintendent Central School District POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECTS SPECIFIC TO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DECEMBER 7, 1987 Existing Conditions Central School District currently houses 3700 students in five elementary schools 12 partial), and one junior high school. The entire District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We are presently awaiting funds from the state to complete an elementary school. In the planned community of Terra Vista, Lewis Homes has provided one: partial portable school and is committed to prov ing a second. The District is entirely dependent upon state `- funding, and has no local or Hello -Roos agreements. Since the District is dependent upon state funding, local developer fees are available ouiy for portable classrooms. The -amainder is part of. a local match that -is given to the Steto of California. Projected Growth - Central School District The District's master plan indicates the District will reach a total growth of approximately 5500 students when build -out is retched between the years 2000 and 2010. Required facilities will be three elementary schools and ono junior high or intermediate school over the next twenty years. Additionally, existing facilities are in serious need of renovation or replacement. Based upon these conditions the District projects the following capital facility needs over the next twenty years: 1. 5500 students will require approximately one new intermediate school and three elementary schools. .7 Projected Costs: i� a. Each Intermediate School $ 28,313,962 b. Each Elementary School $ 10,959,893 Total Intermediate - -1 x 28,313,962 $ 28,313,962 Total Elementary - -3 x 10,959,893 - $ 32 879 679 ' TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS $3i`,1'�13;b7i 2. District Education Center (30,000 sq.ft) Land 5 acres x $273,998 - $ 1,369,990 30,000 sq.ft. x. $229 por sq.ft. $ 6,870,000 Furniture 6 Equipment - $ 1 193.9�8,�3, TOTAL COST $ y,.3.7 ,y 1.1 ' Y i -, �j r�r . POTENTIAL REDEVELOPHENT'AGENCY PROJECTS i' SPECIFIC TO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT December 7 1987 3., Page Two Y 3. Warehouse (20,000 sq.ft.) $ 1,369,990 Land 5 acres x $273,998 - 20,000 sq•fr. x $92 per sq.ft. $ 1 840 000 • TOTAL COST x e' 4. TransportationiKaintenance Facility (5,000 sq.ft.)• Land 5 acres x $273,998 $ 1,369;990 5,000 sq.ft. x $92 sq.ft. $"T66Rt49U TOTAL 5• School Reconstruction - Schools betwean,the ages of 20 44_ and 30 years require capital expenditures to replace roofs, heating and air conditioning units, playground and parking areas, floor coverings, furniture plumbing r xtures, l ighting fixtures, chalkboards, buliatin £ i Gr boards, computer labs, etc. Reconstruction costa are based upon .SOof the replacement cost over a 25 -year period applying a five percent annual inflation adjustment figure. Year 2012 A e Mears enera lementary school f Valle Vista Elementary School 54 Years Cucamonga Junior High School 51 Yoars Dona Herced Elementary School 33 Years Bear Gulch Elementary School 28 Years 1 Intermediate x $18,624,652 $ 18 624,952 4 Elementary x $6,772,709 22 Portable Classrooms Per 2 235 024 School x $16,932 x 6 Schools S TOTAL COST $ 47'Y�u'aic 6. Service Vehicle Acquisition - At build -out it is estimated that there will he approximately 9 schools located in the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga. The District will need approximately 14 service vehicles. 14 Vehicles x $27,400 ° $ 383,600 14 Vehicles Replacement x $27,400 - $� TOTAL COST y �, POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECTS SPECIFIC TO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT December 7, 1987 Page Three Present schools in Central School District do not meet high schools do SOYfacility standards. The have elementary sad junior not multi -media they have cafeterias. The junior centers high school nor do does not have a gymnasium, nor a track. fhese are all common facilities in California schools. School Renovation b District Education Center $ 9,433,973 2Z7_0mentary TMeterias $ 2,324,000 1 Junior High Cafeteria S 1,660,000 4 Media Centers $ 5,312,000 1 Gymnasium $ 2,656,000 1 Track Crounds Renovation $ 2,709,080 Completion of Sear Gulch to which would mean that over a twenty -year period, they may double. Present Standards $ 577 400 TOTAL CAST B. Increased development in Rancho Cucamonga will increase enrollment. Along with that, the growing mebcr of single working parents and families in whit} both parents are employed necessitates child care before, during and after school. The District will need to provide day care facilities. �Dayy Care Facilities 9fac ties x- '1'UUO sq.ft. x $274 per sq.ft. - $ 4,932,000 9. Total All Capital Projects 1 -8 a. New Schoola $ 61,193,641 b District Education Center $ 9,433,973 c Warehouse $ 3,209,990 d. Transportatton /Maintenance $ 1,829,990 e Reconstruction 9 47,950,812 f Service Vehicles $ 767,200 g Renovation $ 15,855,750 h. Day Care Facilities 93f32 000 TOTAL ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS $TL4 r NOTE: These figures do not include the cost of financing, which would mean that over a twenty -year period, they may double. . "+`t`i'p ° -J:4 3cy;;`•. y;� 'OATA'SHELT- -CAPITAL FAC1Li TIES AND EQUIPMENT iy 4YY•�1 The cost analysis -for'schools and other capital centrr inflation n$factorsQDvvr current and projected costs • ittil is ine a fiye p 70 -Year 0er3od. Following. are specific casts related to spacifis types, ;icapital proJectet I AVERAGE ., 1'. TYP'c OF PROJECT CURRENT ESTIMATED INFLATION COST COSTS 5150,000 Per Acre S 397,995 .5 273,998 LaOd Elementary School st 5 M S 3,979,947 i2, Land 10 Acres 4.0 M 10,613,19a Construction Cost 5 M 1.326.640 Furniture k Equipment $10,959,893 6.0 M $15,919,786 'i OTAL COST Ntl 3. Intermediate School S 3.0 M S 7,959,893 Lan. 20 Acres 11.0 M 29,186,275 + Construction b Equipment 1 5 M �i 979.947 Furnit.re M $41,126,113 $28,$13,062 TOTAL COST 15.5 SL Center, „arehouse and transportation /maintenance District Education 10,000 ADA District* faciltties based on a 20 -YEAR AVERAGE TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS INFLATION COST 4, Dls�' .t Ed Center ft. cost $125 Ver SQ- ft- 5332 S 3,979,947 $229 Per sq. Land 10 Acres S 1.5 M 3.75 M 91949,866 Const. 30,000 sq. ft. M 1.909.973 Furniture G Equipment .75 z.c M $ 15,919,78E $10,939,893 TOTAL COST 5, Wareh oast ft. cost S 50 per sq. ft. 5133 $92 $1,369,990 Per sq. Land 5 Acres $ 750,000 1.0 M $ 2,653.290 1-626,649 20,000 SQ- ft. s 0 1.0 M $3.196,639 TOTAL COST 6, Transp./Malnt. Faculty s 50 par sq. ft. $133 $92 $1.369.990 Par sq. ft. coct Land 5 Acres 750,000 alp .000 663,324 S 45b.6 62 5,000 sq. ft. $ 633,324 $1,826,652 TOTAL COST $1,000,000 `^CTA ¢MEET-- EAY1tAL',hACI L "f l�lkb fwu kuul rncn1 kcanc.i �PapV• -Tao - - - --yy 7. Service Vehicle ,Acquisition (10,000 ADA District with 15 schools- ;faric`g` approximately five service vehicles for every four sch --o)s• pluu=ono-fooc,i oorvice- vehicle plus one threo -ton truck.) d i� TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS 20 -YEAR AVERAGE :• '• INFLATION COST COSTS 10 Vehicles x ' $15,000 per Vehicle S 15,000 7 39,EOA T' 27,400 , TOTAL COST $ 270,200 s 716,390 $493,195 8. School Reconstruction (Schools between the ayes of 20 and 70 yiears require capital expenditures to replace roofs,-heating and air conditioning unit:;' playgruund and parking areas, floor coverings, furniture, "plumbing fixtures, lighting fixtures, chalkboards, bulletin boards, computer label etc.` Reconstruction costs are based upon .50 of the replacement cost ovmr a: 25 -year period applying a five percent annual inflation adJustment figuro.) , TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT REPLACEMENT CURRENT 25 -YEAR COST FECONSTRUCTION "INFLATION COST ADJUSTMENT Elementary School $ 4.0 M $2.0 M $ 6,772,709 Intermediate School 11.0 M 5.5 M 18,624,952 I, i a- BOARDOFTRU.STEES -� KENNETH BRADSHAW LUIS GONZALES 5" DAVID ORTEGA LORAINE Md4UI I EN JULIAN R89CON JOHN F. COSTELLO. Eol'. SupMnrondnJ 8776 Arch (bald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga Callfomla 917304698 (714) 987.6942 December 9, 1901 CTY OF RA1jcW CUf WORA ADMINISTRATIuN in DEG 091997 � Lauren Wasserman riBi�I�lDt141�g8�j�pyQ City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0807 Dear Lauren: -,# Enclosed is the information that we discussed at our lunch meeting on November 25th. If I can answer any questions regarding the data Provided, please don't hesitate to contact me. I look forward to hearing from you. kn n±ndent Enclosure i Wllere Su A. ENROLLMENT GROWTH CUCAMONGA SCHOt1L DISTRICT Capital Facility Projects To Mitigate Fedevelopment Agency _ Plan for Protect Area CITY OF RANCHO Ctt6Ak -ONOA ADMINISTRATION AA DEC 091987 718f t`> Ii�lii?fsi41$1� aa� To accommodate the expected increase of new students resldenttal, comm ercial and industrial development, as a result of new the District will have to build new schools and expand present an Cucanga School schools. The District Master Plan developed with data from the Ran0o Cucamonga General Plan has the district's enrollment at build out of aPProximately 6,3:8 students between the years 2000 -2015. Based on this data, the district projects the following Capital Facility:needs over the next 20 years. adjusted for these Cost estimates are Projects to account for inflationary increases in tans and construction costs. yr I. New schools for 3,977 elementary students a 3 7 Elementary x 10,959,893 • 76,719,251 2 Second wing for 700 junior high students 1 Junior High wing x 19,819,773 • 19,819,773 3. Warehouse 30,000 sq. ft. x $92.00 • 2,760,000 ` 4. Transportatlon /Maintenance Facility 5,000 sq. ft. x $92.00 • 460,000 5. District Office 30,000 sq. +t. x $229.00 • 6,870,000 Furniture and Equipmxnt 650,000 6. Media Centers for existing schL -Is 3 x 4,000 sq. ft. x $332.00 . 2.656,000 7 Gym for Junior High School 8,000 sq. ft. x 5332.00 • 2,656,000 S. Track for Junior High School 1/4 mile track • 677,270 9. Cafeteria for Juniur High School 5,000 sq. ft. x $332.00 • 1 6(,0,000 10. Permanent replacement classrooms for Los Amigos 1.,. 15 classrooms x 960 sq. ft. x S274.00 • 3.945,500 s , jlllr:uY , -(�' rp - w':i�- '•t,yu.wYt ��`,, l -1 •r_ _ _ - ... .. _ . y�«v 11. Expand core facilities at existing schools Los Avigcs 3,OGO.sq, ft. x $274.00 = 822,000 Cucamonga 3,000 sq. ft. x $274.00 • 822,000 12. Expand Junior High School Site ?r.+ 5 acres x $268,974.00 = 1,344,870 B. SCHOOL RECONSTRUCTION Existing schools will reed school reconstruction to replace roofs, heating and air conditioning antis, playground and parking areas, furniture, plumbing fixtures, lighting fixtures, chalkboards, floor coverings, bulletin boards, computer labs, etc. Reconstruction costs are based upon .50 of the replacement cost over a 25 year period applying a five percent annual figure. inflation adjustment ` Los Amigos (present age 29 pcars) • 2,100,000 • Cucamonga (present age 30 years) • Rancho present age 13 years) • ' 2,100,000 Temporary Housing for reconstruction 3,259,479 10 classrooms x 5,000 x 2 schools _ 100,000 10 classrooms x 8,979,9 1 school • 89,790 C. SERVICE VEHICLE ACQUISITION To accommodate the existing schools and proposed schools at build out the district will need 15 service vehicles. 15 vehicles x $27.400 • 411,000 15 repla• lent vehicles in 10 years x $27,400 = 411,000 D COMMUNITY USE OF FACILITIES Improve and update 3 fields x $20,000 • 600,060 F DAY CARE FACILITIES To accommodate our increased enrollment and the increased number of single parent and both working parent families which require child care before, during and after school The district will need: 8 facilities 2,000 sq. ft. x $274 • 4,384,000 F CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS SUMMARY 1. Enrol:n-.ent G-owth $123,19U,764 2. School Re;onstruct•,n 7,649,269 3. Service Vehicles 822,000 4. Community Use 600,000 5. Day Care Facilities a 364 000 $136,,646,013 a Al ."The, above cited - projects do not include the cost for long term financing` -` of the projects.; Utilizing�a' typical 20 year Certificates of Participation-, - Financing ,Program'muld''i6crease the total emount needed by 1753 _ 2501 (i.e. " ! a 55,000,000 project with financing cost would require a total amount of 56,750,000 to $12,500,000): - Therefore to finance all the projects identified would require S239,130,558 to $341,615,083. e°; ` c'"o,1H RAlnER SPENCER E COVEDt mAROAALT A CNWESIER CHARLES S SCOLAST'CO AE I 9RCwLE1 LTM A5 •fmNEtSA� ,MEhELLE D [MODEM ROBERT I ANDERSEN C014TANCE S WUnu JWTNANJ molt RACMIIE NCOILE WARNER LAA'OIFVC PARKER AND COVERT .. «n wna.�w.nw 1-2 w01EASTFOURIHSTREET WTEW SANTA AKA, CALIFORNIA 92705 December 7, 1987 Markman 6 Arczynaki One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92622 -1059 Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. Re: l District v. Rancho Cucamonga e eve o meat enc an ernax no uper or ourc o. 43193 AMA CM TII -' 1nEPWW ETY21]E 1 REF "IMF E: -106 Dear Mr. Markman: ' Enclosed he °ewith is a list of re airements of the Etiwanda School District for which partial ndinY nswillght from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency- note the estimated total cost of the projects to be $370,773,511. You should also note that the dollar amounts sought for these particular projects are over a substantial period of time. The specific new facilities needs are assumed over twenty years, the school reconstruction needs are for the are years. Attached is a data sheet shoving standardized costs- The flations rate based growth pon a estimate factor per year over a twenty year period, for simplicity, the average Cost as medicoat .tween the present cost and the twenty year The total dollar needs of the Etiwanda School District for capi -31 outlay purposes greatly exceed the amount of sums which the school district could anticipate receiving from ttx increments of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The District is of the opinion, retetvedifrommountiof thenDi District' needs should be RECEIVED- ' 81987 E9 1. _yam: ,t uw OLl KLS PARKER AND COVERT Markman 6 Arczynski Attention: James L. Markman, Esq. December 7, 1987 Page Two This is particularly true when a substantial amount of the impact on the District is being produced because of a promotion of growth by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The Etiwanda School District believes their projected needs are conservative considering the amount of development that is presumed to occur within the portion of the District within the city boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Also attached is the total estimated income during this period of time, excluding, however, income from the Redevolopment Agency. Again, the estimated income shows an average income. Th a income assumes that the developer foes which were authorized by the 1986 Legislaturie and the special taxes authorized by the voters within the Etiwanda School District will stay in place, again having an inflationary factor apply to both. The school district does reiterate its desire to receive fifty percent (50%) of the tax increment attributable to the tax rate of the Etiwanda School District within the Etiwanda School District's boundaries and within the boundaries of the Rancho Cucamonga School District. This amount does not appear to provide the shcrtfall for the funding needs, but would provide a substantial share of the needed funds required by the Etiwanda School Dictrict. In no event would the District seek funding from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency in exceso of its needs as set forth in the enclosed materials. This letter does constitute an offer of the Etiwanda School District to compromise the above - entitled litigation. We are available Lo meet with you regarding this matter in the immediate future. It is requested that copies of the enclosed material be forwarded to the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Very truly yours, Cl Con M. Parker CRP /pg2642 Enclosures cc: Dr. Carleton P. Lightfoot, Superintendent Etiwanda School Dictrict N : TOTIMAL 11DON OPWT hanct, MOJECTS SPECIFIC TO •- Wr;AHDA ICHOOL DISTLICr. DECMR 7, 1987 ` Existing Conditions Currently the Etivr to School District houses 1,300 students in two elementary schools and one Intermediate school. All are located in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The district is in the process of building a third elesentsry school in the vintage Hams tract, north cf Highland and vast of Milliken Av3nue, which will open in Soptenber, 1988. A fourth a!amentary school will be constructed during the 1988 -89 school yacr in the Heritage Homes, located in the city of Fontana. Financiug for the new schrols has been provided through developer feat and Hello -Loos agreements. projected Crasth— Etivands School District Approximately seventy portent of the Itiwands School District is located within the city boundaries of Rancho Cunsuunge a d thirty percent to the city of Footena. According to the District Master plan, the dlatrict will reach build out somewhere between the Fact 2000 -2010. At that time the dlstric ;_ will serve approximately 25,000 rtudents. Seventy percent cf th2 students, 17,500, will reside in the aity if Rancho Cucamonga. it is eatimntw.l that the district can adaquately house .;,070 of these students leaving 15,430 students unhouned. Based upon this dare, the district projects the following capital facility needs over the next 70 yearst 1. 15,430 students 011 require appr schools and 15.5 elementary schools. Projected Costs: s. Each Intermediate School b. Each Elemantary School Total Intermeditta, 5 x 28,313,962 Total Elementary, 15.5 x 10,959,893 TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS :ximetei7 five new internedtate $ 25,313,962 S 10,959,893 $141,565,310 $169 878 342 $311,443',652 2. Addition@ to District Education Center (46,000 sq. ft.) 45,000 sq. ft. x $229 per sq. ft. f 30,534,000 lumiture 6 EQuipment $ 1 000 000 TOTAL COST $ 111,53b,-00P 3 warehouse (40,000 sq. ft.) Land 5 Arras x $273,998 - $ 1,369,990 40,000 sq. ft. x $92.00 sq. ft. $ 3 680 000 TOTAL COST $ ", 4. Transportation /Maintenance Facility (5,000 aq. It.) Land 5 Acres x $273,998 - $ 1,369,990 5,000 sq. ft. x $92.00 sq. ft. $ 460 000 TOTAL $ T,129 M 1� E tlY SpzC1FiC,T0,ZTXVvWA•'SC1ML; DISTRICT' _,22- Deaesbar'7, 1987' Page Two 5 8cbool necons true tion--;fehools between the &Sex of 20 and 30 yesrs_ require capital lexpscditurts" to rasolac�a roofs, heatiog and-air conditioning units,, playground indtp&rking areas, floor,coviel furniture, plumbing fixtures, ',able, ,Ilgbtibg,, fixtu-es, bulletin boards, �,comFutsr sit. ReconiZructlon costs are bisad upon .50 of tLe replacement cost' over a 25 -year period. applying a five percent annual Inflation adjuits cut figure. Year 2012 Ago TU—= =tElemsutary School 45 Years Etivanda intermediate School 77 Years YindrowB Elementary School 25 Years Caryn Elecentary School 24 Years I Intermediate x $18,624,652 $ 18,624,952 3 Eltmentary x 56,772,709 s 2_0j318 127 TOTAL COST 6. Service Vehicle Acquisition—At build out-it 18'estimated that there will be approximstaxy 24 schools located In the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga. The district will need approximately 36 service vihicles. 36 Vehicles x $27,400 986,'400 36 Vehicles Replacement x 427.400 $ 966.400 TOTAL COST $ 1,972:800 7. Total All Capital ProJscts 1-6 a. New Schools $311.443,652 b. District Education Center $ 11,534.00 c. Varabousn $ 5,049,990 d. Trainsportation/maittenance s 1,829,990 a. Reconstruction $ 38,943,079 I. Service Vehicles $ 1,972,300 TOTAL $370.773:511 M 1� E Moslem W" A. Developer Teas S1.03, per - sq. it. B Override Tax $1,600 par dwelling unit, adjusted annually plus 5Z inflation factor C. Based upot 31,000 dwelling units over the next 20 years. 1. Average dwelling unit size 1,200 sq. ft. 2. 1.500 honea per year Lavelopor Fees Annual 3,500 Hox.-3 x 1,200 sq. ft. - 1,800,000 sq. It, 1,800,000 sq. ft. x $1.03 sq. ft. - $1,354,000 Lax vRrride Annual 1,500 Homes x f1,600 - $2,400,00 Total Actual - $4,254,000 Developer Fees 20- Year Estimate 20 x $1,854.000 $31,030,000 Tax Override 210•yeav estimate with 51 inflation factor a. Range Low High 1,600 4,245 (1) 2,400,000 (11) 3,909,347 (2) 2,520,000 (22) 4,104,814 (3) 2,646,000 (13) 4,310,055 (4) 2,778,300 (14) 4,525,557 (5) 2.917,215 (15) 4,751,835 (6) 3.063,076 (16) 4,989.427 (7) 3.216,229 (17) 5.238.899 (8) 3.377,041 (18) 5,500.843 (9) 3.545,893 (19) 5.775,886 (10) 3 723 137 (20) 6 064 680 30:186941 TOTAL #79355,284 Total Developer Fees $ 37,080,000 Tax Override 79,359,284 total all sources $116,435,284 Moslem W" Ei -4�. i e e - \.ry ..� �• 1 i 3�ii A V.A l lb TA SME- CAPITAL FACILITIES AND EOUIPMEN7- i' �' �r'; ,d,y� a+ 1' The east anal, ysiis for, schools and other capital expenditures, is haeed•,upo� current and protected Corts- utilizin) a five percent inflation faetor;' over; r, , y 20 -year period. Fotl a,i+n'i are specific costs related to l specific-, capital proJectn+ vh, 'tg I. TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT ESTIMATED 20 -YEAR b . AVERAO£ , COSTS INFLATILN 1 CO by, • Lagd ;150,000 per Acre ; 397,995 , ; 273,998 " 2. Elementary School Land 10 Acres ;1.5 M ; 3,979,947 CJnstruction Cost 4.0 M 10,613,191 Furniture & Equipment .5 M 1.376.645 tk TOTAL COST 6.0 M 1915,919,786 610,957,893 , if z3. Intermediate School Land 20 Acres ; 3.0 M s 7,959,093 Construction 11.0 M 29,186,275 Fu- nature L Equipment 1.5 M 3.979.947 �. ?- TOTAL COST 15.5 K $41,126,115 $26,313,062 . Dirtrict Education Center, warehouse and transportation /maintenance ,7.. facilities based on a 10,000 ADA District. TYPE OF PROJECT CURRENT COSTS 20 -YEAR AVERAGE >' INFLATION COST • 4. District Ed Center § Per sq. ft. cost ;125 par sq. ft. ;332 ;229 Land 10 Acres ; 1.5 M ; 3,979,947 '�. Const. 30,000 sq. ft. 3.75 M 9,949,866 Furniture L Equipment ---L2; -n 1,989,973 TOTAL COST 6.0 M S 15, 919,786 610,959,893 5. Warehouse Per sq. ft. cost ; 50 per sq. ft. ;133 ;92 Land 5 Acres ; 750,000 ;1,369,990 20,000 sq. ft. ; 1.0 M ; 2,653.290 1.826.649 TOTAL COST 6 1.0 M 63.196,639 6. Transp./Maint. Facility Per sq. ft. cost ; 50 per sq. it. ;133 ;92 Land 5 Acres 750,000 $1.369.990 5,000 sq. ft. 250.000 663,324 f 436.662 t TOTAL COST 61,000,000 S 633,324 61,026,652 M, a'. -'I �k:* %C 'On Page Two % -7 Mg 7. Service Vehicia." A C� approximately ly every,-four rervice vehicle pt u s ne':'t" ree on truck of .) TYPE OF PROJECT. URRENT COSTS 204iAR AVERAGE INFLATION; COSTS 18 Vehicles x $15,000 Per Vehicle S 15,000 S 39.800 f77,,•%00 TOTAL COST s 270,6'00 * 716,390 6493,IPS B. School Reconstruction (Schools between the mesa Of 20 ahl 30 years requir capital expenditures to replace ronis, heating and air•c"inditioning units playground and parking areas, floor coverings, ftrnitura,; 6lUmbing lighting fikturest chalkboards, bulletin' Reconstruction 41gt,r,n boards, computer labs, ate Costs are ased,upon e50 of 25-Year paricd applying :-fiva percent annual the replacement cost over inflation ad.16stmant figure.) T(PE OF PROJECT CURRENT REPLACEMENT CURRENT 25-YEAR�zz, COST RECONSTRUCTION INFLATION COST ADJUSTMENT Elementary School f 4.0 M Intermediate, School 11.0 M $2.0 M S 6,772,709 5.5 M 18,624,952 a'. RANCIIO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY December 15, 1987 Dr. Prank Cosca Central School District 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Dr. Cosca: n ••1 Letters also mailed to: =' John Costello Carlton Lightfoot ` M ORO W 101, IWd., Csam,p. CLL: >r. w1w, I11,I MF1U1 1 i I have received a letter from your attorney pertaining to school facilities projects needed by your school district. While the letter was very interesting, I was very disappointed in the content, since it does not address the issues which we discussed at our lunch meeting and which I later reiterated to you in a letter dated November 30, 1587. The letter from your attorney, Clayton Parker, is a restatement of the same position which you have held since we reached an impasse in negotiations earlier in the year -- that is, the district desires to receive 501 of the tax increment attributable to Central School District within the Project Area. I had hoped, after our last meeting, that we were beyond that point. I find it very frustrating to be working through these old arguments again. I want to make very clear that the Redevelopment 4gency is more than willing to mitigate any impact on the school districts which are a result of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1. However, the projects which your attorney nas supplied to us give no indication of a relationship to redevelopment. They are, in fact, merely a list of tll projected needs relating to the ultimAte growth of your Eistrict. As we have stated before, in order to justify any payments to the school districts, we must be able to quantify the impacts that relate dirtestly to the Plan Amendment. Your attorney's letter states only that "partial funding" of the projects is being sought from the Agency, which la apparently unrelated to the 501 figure. Additionally, I find the figures suggested as projects' costs to be incredible. Your own consultant examined the five school districts' needs and determined that the total for all five was only about $244 Hilliun. You will recall that these findings were entered into the public record at figures the time of the amendment. However, the new fLgures supplied by the three school districts of Central, Cucamonga and Etiwanda now total over $857 Million. t ' no mean mere y a liatcr Qes1red_PtcjActs and costs like the one supplied by yourr,attorney..,_ y If you wish to discuss this matter furthorr�Flease' call me. We firmly believe that this issue, ca, bn resolved only through rational and professional basay yfor_ discussion. Arbitrary approaches provide no opportunity for an'equitable settlement. .'cc Sincerely, Lauren H. Wasserman City Hanager W; ' . y , - �• y - `; _ �:, •`x - ' _ � In order for us to- "proceed any further 'in negotiations, it - w will be necessary --for you 'to. provide us-, with dstailed - �r � information on fivancial.1apacts to,the distict that relate -•,, �_ d directly to - the' Sedevelo nt- Plan- Amendment- Wo. 1: By , , no mean mere y a liatcr Qes1red_PtcjActs and costs like the one supplied by yourr,attorney..,_ y If you wish to discuss this matter furthorr�Flease' call me. We firmly believe that this issue, ca, bn resolved only through rational and professional basay yfor_ discussion. Arbitrary approaches provide no opportunity for an'equitable settlement. .'cc Sincerely, Lauren H. Wasserman City Hanager W; t .i , October 7. 1987 - CITY OF RANCHO COf10DNCA , CITE =9= N.9=3 A. C.ALt. TO ORDBR A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cociesouga not on Wadnasday. October 7, 1987, in the Lions Pa$ Caeomnity linter, 9161 Base ilae Road, Rancna Cucamonga, The tasting vas called to order at 702 p.m. by tttlor Dennis L. Stout. Present vice CouacU -A mbaras DeLorab H. Brave. Cbaries J. Buquat 3I, Jaffrey Ring, Pamela J. Wright, sad Mayor Denu;A L. Stout. Also present veres City Manager, Lauren H. Wassarm n an$ Assistant City Mager, Robert A. Rizzo; City Attorney. imam Markman$ Deputy City Clark. Debt& Adams$ city Planner. Brad Buller$ City Hoginer, Rususll Meguira$ Community S""icea Director, Willi" Staley, Administrative services Director. Jim Haiti and Sr. Adminiotrative Assistant, Mark Lorimar. f f A f f B. ANNOuNCf1= /PRSSE?MMTIONS Bl. presentation of Proclamation declaring October 1&-24, 1987, as National Business Women-a Week. B2. Presentation of Proclamation to Jorri Kearney for bar outstanding contributions to the City of Ranch* Cucmonga. B3. presentation of Proclamation declaring the mouth of October a Toatmastars r e....:cations Month. f f f f f f C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval cf Minates$ August 19. 1967 Saptember 2. 1907 C2. Approval of Warrants. Register Nola. 9/16187. 9/23/87 and 9/30/67 and Payroll ending 9/3/87 and 9/17/87 for the total mount of 91.553,119.73. ,H C1. Approval to receive and file currant Investment Schedule as of September 30, 1987. C4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sala Oanazal Bating Place, gQni'a. 2 Nancy 8 Jack Wu. 10006 Foothill Blvd. - r a. City CounciOtiz October 7, 1987 Page 2 C5. Approval to meant& Prof"r;ional Samica Agreement (CO 87 -353) for the Design of the City Corporation Yard at 9153 9th Straet Atli preparation of plane and contract tocuaanta awarded to Pituri- Deleon Arehitacts of Rancho Catamonga ` for the amount of $118.410 ($107.645 glut 105 coutingancy) an be funded from Capital Reserve. Sid was awarded by Council on 9-16 -87. I= XDD4ED ROit DISCUSSION 06. Approval to execute Improvement Agremmt Extension for Tracts 13058, 11059. and 13060, lacateA in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by The Williem Lyon company. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -520 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCT. OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAH OwA. CALIFORNIA. APFRO HO xNFEmmBNr xHimmmi EET8NSI0H AND IHPROVEHXRT SECUEM FOR TRACT 13058. 13059. AHD 13060. C7. Approval of a Resolution confiming a City Council decision made w Saptmbor 23. 1981 for an appeal of planning Commisaim conditions relating to Emimmental Assesment and Tentativa Tract No. 19476- Wiliisms Property Consultants. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -521 i . - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COON= OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CICAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP. NUMBER 13476. TO PERMIT A CUSTOM LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 9.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISW-'C". AND LOCATLD ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RELLMLW AVENUE AND T'RYON STREET'. RANCHO COCAMOAA. CALIFORNIA. AND MARINO FINDINGS AND SUPPORT TREPEOP CC. Approval of Parcel Map 10884 located at the northeast coiner of Archibald Avon" and Haas Line Road, submitted by %ycamore Investment, Jr.. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -522 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIIORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10884 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10884) C9. Approval of the formation of a Technical Committee to assist in the development of Fire Protection Facilities. CIO. Approval to amend Engineering Diviciou budget to upgrade a vacant Assistant Civil Engineer position to an Associate Civil Engineer position in the Traffic Management Section. IA, City Council minutes October -7. 19A7, C31. Approvsl to adopt a Disadvantaged Soainaas Enterprises program (BSS). RUMUT10H No. 87 -523 A RECOLLYION OF THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIS! OF RAN(VO CUCAMOHGA. CALIEWIA. ADOPTING A POLICY STR 1T ZNT AND OrMH SNSr: FOR AN ACTIVE DISMLVZAGRD BUSINESS ETIRR_aRISSS (DEB) PRL'CRA'[ C12. I.pproval to ^ -cutm AnAndoent to msp and Plan Checking Agreements for Engineering Services u >.h C 0 Engicaaring COD 87"•109), Derbieh, Cuertn and Associates (OD 87 -110), L.A. Usinstutc and Aasoeistas (CO 87 -111) for Fiscal Year 1987 -88. C13. Approval to initiate acquisitim prosy 4rw for the house and land at 5702 Amethyst Avenue for futnrs right- of-say for Nilson Avenue. Funds to .omo from the System Development :.md. C14. Approval to execute Iaprovrmmt Agreement Extensiou for Tract 11793. located on the southeast corner of Larson Avon" and Amethyst Street, submitted by Penfield House. RESOLUTION N0. 87 -524 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCDO CUCAMNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING I@ROVDROrY ErmsloH AGREPJOVT AND IMPRDFBNSNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11793 C15. Approval to execute Impravemant Aarson"t Extension for Parcel map 8680. located on the east aide of Rsmona south of Pass Line Road, suhmitted bI H 6 S Residential Development. Iatorporated. RESOLUTION N0. 67 -525 A RESCLUTIOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN ®D MCAWNCA. CALIFDRHIP. APPROVING nWR07E?Mr. MR]O2 = LTMSION AND INPRO7MORCT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 8680 C16. Approval to execute Acooding Hap. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and release of Improvemant Agcaetant and Improvement Security for Tract 13057, located in the Victoria Planned Comuni.y between Milliken Avon" and the Deer Creek Channel, northerly of the Southern Pacific Railroad. submitted by the Fieldstone :ompaoy. City Council Minutes , ' October 7, 1987 - Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -526 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIDICA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMpEC7xW T IORSEMENT AND IPFROVIDGINT SECURITY FOR TRACT NO. 13057 AND RELnSnm IMPROVEMENT AORL17= AND -KIME IM SECURITY PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY PESMUTION NO. 87 -527 A RESOLUTION OP M CCITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OT RANCHO CUchmom , cALIPOg n. APPRMINO AMENDlWG MAP-OF TRACT N0. 13057 C17. Approval to Qacnto Nap. Improvement Agreement and Improvaeut Security for Tract 13353, located at the northeest corner of Archibald and Nineteenth Street, submitted by ALA Liaited Partners, A California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION ND. 87 -528 A RESOLUTION OF r'dg CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO VICANGNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. LMpR3VEQaNY SSCORITT. AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13353 CIS. Approval to azecute Nap. 7mprovemant Agreement and Improvesaat Security for Tract 13475, located at the northeast corner of Ramous Avenue and Church Street Avenue, submitted by W.D.S. Development. RESOLUTION W. R7 -529 A RESOLUTION OF THE QTY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROJEM AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT NO. 134.5 C19. Approval to Beard tho bid for Fhass 2, of the Area VII Storm Drain Improvement Project to Drainage Construction to be funded from Drainage Fund for the mount of $875,632.00. CIO. Approval to authorize the advertising of tha *Notice Inviting Bidae for the Rmona Avenue Reconstruction Improvement Project, between 19th and Victoria Stroets. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -530 A RESOLUTION OF IRS CITr COUNCIL or THE am Of RANCHO COCANGNGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE eRAMOXk AVENUE RECUNSTRUCIION*. IN SAID CITY .4WD ADINOF=INU AND DIRECTING THE CITY MMM TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS x ' City Council Miiuteo`L���ti', ` Octobor 7, 1987J "= Page 5 ^' C C21. Approval to ward the bid for Hmen Avon" Hadiav Beautification, Phase , ': I II Iaprovment Projoit from 4th Street to Arrow Route :o Hacienda Lan6capa. - , •; Incorporated, for the'amount - 3• C C22. Approval to establish a contribution amount required of detalopenu as • ;L c contribution to the' City-in -lion of the construction of nadim ial'cods, on ' i� A 'Haven ti R RESOLUTION NO. 87 -532 A RE30LUTION OF THE CITE COUNM -OF THE, CITY OF RANCHO COCAMMA. C CALIPOR1" ESTABLISHING, -AHD ADOPTING A CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT PERTAINING To THE ODNSTAHCIION OF THE RUSH AVENUS MEDIANS BETIEEH ARROW ROUTE AND 1978 STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAIONOA C23. Approval to azecute agromani'for Installation it Public Iaprovaeent a and , , - 013canonga for Street Frontage Inproveaents at 9744 Arrow Route. H A RES06UT7014 OF THE- CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RAHCIO CUCA1ONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACUS rNO AN AGRX%Mff MR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVIDENT AND DEDICATION FROM ,. AUGUST H. REIM. III AND AUTHORMING THE MAYOR AND CITY z CLERK TO SIGN SAME C24. Approval to execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 81 -148) between ` the City of Rancho Cuc"anga and L. D. King. Inc., to prepare Topographical Design Survey Servicen for the Improvement of Vie Carrillo Drive frog Avenida Vajar to East of Sierra Maare Avenue (e 1500 ft.), the maximum fan is $2.600.00 and the projecr. is uoder CMG Fmdimg, C25. Approval to release cash deposit in the mount oft 82.500 to Pulta Homa Corporation for temporary Bales trailer for Tract 13022. 8500 to Rancho Verde Village Ltd, for subdivision sign. Tract 12091. 92,500 for Criemar Dav6lO2mant Corporation for temporary sales office. Tract 9440. 81,000 for on -site subdivision signs, 82.500 for temporary sales office, and 6500 for a trap fence to the Door Creek Company for Tract 12807 -1. If City Council Minatas October 7. 1997 Page 6 r. CI6. ApROVQ to aeeeyt Lyrwmeeta, Release of Honda And Notice of Completion s tart ') Tract 12726 - located between Hear Crack Avenue and Osddleback Place. a Releases i Faithful Perfonanca Bond (Street) $68,255.00 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Boni (Street) $ 6.625.50 4,R RESOLUTION NO. 87 -533 ys A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHC CUMHOUOA. CALIFORNIA. .S ACCBPTIN3 THE PUBLIC INTROU RENTS FOTA TRACT 12726 AND 3 AUTHORiZI117 THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMpLRTION FOR THE- - 1 NORr Tract 11727 - located batman Haar Creek Avenue and Saddleback Place. Releases Faithful ?erforaance bond (Street) $39,696.00 Accepts i Maintenance Gaarmvtse Bond (Street) $ 3,969.60 RESOLUTION ND. 87 -534 A RES(E.UTION OF THE s.`ITf OF RANCHO CUCAMD113A. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC L!PRMz:xLTTS FOR TRACT 12727 AND AUIHORIZIN3 THE FILIIA 0? A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE VOID Tract 12040 - located on the Northt"t corner of Turner Avenue mud Arras Route. Releases Faithful Perfo:n ance Eand (Shoot) $A.21505.00 Accepts Ya:atanance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 2.t,253.00 M t city Council NSLtutes October 70'1967 °.SSMMON NO. 87 -535 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT3 OF RANC80 CUCt3CNG,t. CALImmrIA. ACCRP= TEE r(rdLIC IMPR07umM FOR TPLT 12040 AND AOTHORIZING THE Tnn)3 OF A NOTICE OF COMH.ETION FOR THE WORK C27. Approval of Article 8 Claim Trawportatiou Funds for Fiscal Year ;r 1986 -1987. C28. Approval to authorize the transfer of funds from Send 09 (Gas Tar 2107) to m Fund II (Gas Tax 2106). C29. Approval of ancoabrances from FY 87 -88 and appropriate the fonds to the account as outlined in the report. C30. Approval to hire one part -tine Administrative Intern sa suplmrt staff for Oommunity Penn 00 datim and City bnsinese in an ancunt not to exceed $5.0 for FY 87 -88. C31. Approval of contract (W 87 -155) between the City of Rancho oucewougs and etivanda School District for joint we of facilities and anchorite the Mayor to sign upon approval by the Etiwanda school District. ITRS RIMOVED FOR DISCUSSION C32. Approval of the Conceptual Development Plans for two neighborhood parks to be located within the Victoria Development as recmeeuded by the Park and Recreation Cooaission and Planning Coneiesiou. C33. Approval to accept tho Victoria Groves Park Project in tho Victoria Planned Comanity as complete and authorize the Director of Community Services t.. File a N't1w of Completion. 15721 ISHUM IBM UMMA C34. Approval to award Professional Services AAremant (00 87 -156) with Porkiae -Rose Associates of Fullerton. California to develop working droving for construction of West Beryl lark anpausion. The base contract is $29.450.00 and a 102 coutingecey totals $32.395.00. C35. Approval of contract (CD 87 -157) for Community Development Block Grant adninistrative services with Michael Braudaan Associates in the amount of $24.410.00 for tbt 1:57 -08 CDBO program year. C36. Approval of Emergency Management Assistance Signature Resolution as required by State Offico of Emergency Services to facilitate Rancho Coremosga'■ request to participate in Funding Assistance program. .4 t City Council.' Minutes October 7, 1987 Page 8 RESOLUTION NA. 87 -536 A RESOLUTION OF SHE CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITr OF RANCHO COCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, NAMING INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE HERPBY 7.U3HORIZED TO EXECUTE FOR AND IN BEHALF OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. A PUBLIC ENTITT ESTABLISHED UNDER THE LAWS OF SHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. APPLICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS FOR ISE PURPOSE OF OSTAINIIA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER IRS FEDERAL CIVIL LEFENSE ACT OF 1930. AS AMENDED. (PUBLIC LAW 920. 81ST COSIRESS. 30 USC APP. 2251 -2297) C37. Approval of rantract for renewal of Code Enforceswnt Representative. C38. Sat public bearing for October 21, 1987 for Nis Bass Line load Widening Environmental Assesment Review. (Hellman Avenue t, Archibald Avanw). The projects limits are from the Southern ?acifAc Railrond Tracks East of HelLsan Avenue to Archibald Avwus. RESOLUTION NO, 87 -537 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTr COUNCIL OF THE GlTr OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING AND SESTINA A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF WHDNESDAY. OC1Y 8ER 21, 1987 FOR SHE BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING HNCIROAION'LAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW C39. Set public hearing for October 21, 1987 for the Arrow Route Pbaee I Environmental Assessment Review. (.Archibald Avenue to Turner (Eomosa) Avenue). The projects limits are the Korth side of ,.Prow Route from Archibald Avenue to Turner (Hermosa) Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -538 A RESOLUTION OF SHE CITr COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC NEARING DATE OF SMURESDAY. OCTOBER 21. 1987 FOR SHE ARRW ROUTE PHASE I QNIHONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW 040. Sat public hearing for Koveabar 4. 1987 — Apprwal to Anne, Parcel Nap 10884, located on the Northeast career of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Aoneration No. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -539 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITr COUNCIL OF SIZE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA. CALIPORNIA. Or PRELIIQHURY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEERPS RETORT FOR ANNUATION N0. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 „..�.,A.,x,Z,y `— ..' .cam "sill °b -` :�_ �` 'S. .. ... t: • -, - s_•.,a, �y,ec� City council Minute October'7,a1P87 Pa8i. 9: is - •- ' ` RESOLUTIOU NA. 87 -540 A RESOLUTION' OP THE ; CITY • COUNCIL OP THE, CITY OF, RANCHO ' CUC A ONGA.: CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION To OR= THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LMMMO MAINIM NC; DISTRICT N0. 6, AN ASSESSM MT•'..DISTRICri„ DESIGNATING SLID .ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION.NO.'•5 TO'stinT LIOHTINC M&u=ANCE DISTRICT N0. 61 PURSUANT„TO TPA'LANDSCAPM AND LIGHTING ACT.OP'1972 AND t)PPERING A TIM AND PLACE FOR HMXNi3 OIJELTION6 THERETO M1' CA1. Sat public hearing for November 4. 1987 - Approval . to Annea Srset Noe,. 13542 -1, 13475, and 10414 To Street Lighting Maintenance Divtri:iYo. 2 as Annaxation No. 23. .. _ RESNTION N0. 87 -341 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY OP RANmo CUCAIDNGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL' OF CITT - --- _ ENOINRER'8 AEFORT OP ANNEXATION W. 23 TO STREET LIGHMIG - MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 70. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -54: A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL 01' 288 CITT OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA DEO.Axm ITS IGNIETIOn TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION :0 STREET LIGHTING NArmIERANOI DISTRICT NO. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTt DESIGNATING OAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 23 TO STREET LIGHTIM muirmwce DISTRICT NO. 2: PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCiAP11G AND =H7M ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIm ANND PLACE FOR HEARIN) OBJECTIONS THEBE'1'+1 CA2. Set public hearing for Noveebor 4. 198- - Approval to Annex Tract Nov. 13542 -1, 13475, 13353, 10414 and Parcel Nap 10884 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 32. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -543 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Cy RANCHO CUCAMMA. CALIFORNIA. OF PNFLI.%(INART APPROVAL 0: CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 32 TO S' -RENT LIGHTING M&INIEHANCH DISTRICT NO. 1 } w -i .v ;r. sw r i t r- y'♦ City Council Munroe October 7. 1987 Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -544 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONOA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO .STEEST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRaCrt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 32 TO STREET LIGHTI'n0 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFHRI7G A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C43. Set public bearing for November 4. 1987 - Approval to Annez DR 86 -21 (Industrial Commrcial At") to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 7. RESOLUTION NG. 87 -545 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT: COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU AMONGA. CALIFORNUI. OF PRMDII NARY APPROVAL OF CITY ffiG7NEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RESOLUTION NG. 87 -546 A RRSOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUUMNGA. CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO GILDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE NATNT'ENANCZ DISTRICT N0. 3. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION No. 7 TO LANDSCAPR MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 38 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AID LIGHTING ACT Or 1972 AND OFFERING A TINS AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C44. Set public hearing for November 4. 1987 - Approval to Ann= Tract Noe. 13542 -1. 13475. 13353 and 10414 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 38. RESOLUTION M. 87 -547 A RESOLUTION OF TAB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA. CAILIFV3NIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'$ REPORT FOR AN`IERATION N0. 33 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTPNANCS DISTRNCr NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -348 A RESOLUTION OF TES CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOPNi4 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PISTRIC7 NO. 1. AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DESIGNATING SAID ANIOBATION AS ANNEXATION W. 38 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. It PURSUANT TO DIE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes October 7. 1987 Page +il %. 1UTIOA, Novad Lr Ring. seeondsd by Vsight to approve the Covent Calondsr •r : x sinus items 5. 31 and 33. Motion carried 5-0. Y+ 1HHf Dircussion of Its t3. 6. Approval to $scuts Professional Service Agreement (CD 87 -153) for the 9153 9th Street and preparation of plane ! Design of the City on yard at awarded to Pitssei -DA"ot drehitk� is of Rancho Me"oaga '3• and contract documents 6114.410 (6107,645 plus 101 eontingavey) to be funded !rem r: for the amount of Capital Sesame. Bid was awarded by Council on 9- 16-87. i L Moved King. seconded by giant to approve itm 5. Motion carried 4-1 (Wright � 1HHf Discussion of Item C31. Cil. Approval of eonrree c (co 87 -155) between the City of Rancho Cocaseep and facilities and anthorisa the Mayor to t Etivanda Sch000Distr 8tivendn School sign upon app Willies Sollay. Community Services Director, gave brief report on thin item. Questiano were asked of Mr. Rolla, regarditg the agreement and what the City would gat in return fine this. Addressina council worst Phil Sanderson. President of A.C.T.I.V.3.1 6505 Dogwood Mace. Poncho be vary good for both the Cutenongs, stated he felt this agreoeent would City and the School District. agct000fDistriet. High School, felt this would m Lightfoot. benefit h Ci gpe the MOTION, Moved by Stout, seconded by Vrigbt to approve the agreement with Etiwanda School District. Motion serried 5-0. Hf1H Item C33 pulled from the agenda and to come back at a future meeting. 411Hf f a a r f f L v- {) City Council Minutes ,T October 7, 1987 .�, Page 1: D. CONSENT ORDINANCES Dl. RNVIRD ---- TAL A8SES3lOU7f AND ETINAN A SPECIFIC PLAN ARS'CA WT 87 -02 - QTY OF RAIMUWD CIIEJW CA — Am aaesdeent to teawe from the Etivanda Specifle Plan apprc=- -staly 5 acrr- of land on the north aide of Foothill 3ovlevard between the I -15 Frowsy end Bur Avenues apprcafaately 5 acres of lead on the eoutheart corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevards and oppvariaately 14 acres of land on the santhwsst corner of East Avenue and Foothill baulward - APH 217- 211 -24. 23 and 27. APH 227- 221 -01 -03. 07 -09, 14 and 22 -27. APR 227 - 231 -19. 21. 28. 29. 33 and 34. AFN 229 - 311 -14 and 15. AN 229 - 041 -01, and .r port-loos of APR 227 - 231 -16 and 23. t Dopaty City Clerk Adano read the title of Ordinance He. 330. ODDINANCg NO. 320 (second nvading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCDO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPRO71M ETTR7NDA SPECIFIC PLAN (S.S,P.) AMENUMIT 87 -02 REQUESTIIA LAND ON 292 HORTH SIDE OF F007HILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN THE I -15 FRE12AT AND EAST AYE=. me SOUTHEAST CORNER OP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE. AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVEM BE DELETED FROM THE B.S.P. - MOTIONS Moved by King, seconded by Buquat to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 320 and adopt amid Ordinance. Notion carried 5-0. iW a e e a r C D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDusTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AM3WDME7T 87 -01 - a' CI,Y OF RANCHO CUCAYONCA - An anandeent to remove from the Industrial Specific Plan approximately 80 acme of load on the south side of Foothill Boulevard berms= the 1 -15 Frowsy and Etiwanda Avenue - AFN 229 - 031 -0t. 16 and 20 and portions of 229 - 021 -57 and 39. Deputy City Clerk Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 321. ORDIFANCE NO. 321 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITr COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO OUCAWDNGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I.S.P.) AHEWJMSWT 87 -01 REQUESTING LAND ON THE BOOTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BE7NEEN THE I -15 FREIWAI AND ETIWANDA AVENUE BS DELETED FROM THE I.B.P. NOTIONS Movei by King, seconded by Boquet to ware fall reading of Ordinance No. 321 and adopt said Ordinance. Motion carried 5-0. a a e a r e r 7• tI D3. _ [IT City Council •'Min�utRS-�. Octaber 7,. °1987.:c Pass, 1l� +: y+ ' Y 'i,, zeauce me maauom required lot depth on 3,000 square toot late from 75,feet`to 60 feat, to reduce the'aiadaot: requited lot depth on 4.000 sguarm toot lots from 80 last to 70''feet..,sad to•rquire s min+.. tan (10) font front yard _�4 4, setback tar the living atea,co 3.000 and 4,000 square foot Late. ' '+ p,. Deputy City Clark Adema raid the title of'Ordinaaee No. 312. ,�{ OEAINANCS'N0. 322 (second reading) , $'I 5 AN ORMNAMCE::OF, MR CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITt OP RANC30_ CUCAMONGA. CALIPORNIA. ADOPTING_txCTORIA COYMNITY VPLAM AMU MEHT 87Z- 01. %TO NODIPY..28C. WNfJETY PLAN TET.TO_ NELUCS , t'y TAE MINIMUM LO! DEPIN ON 3.000 SQr�4EE, POUT LOTS 1R0N 7$ PE'6l „N- y TO 60 PERT, TO REDOCE'THE MVIWA LOT DEM on 4.000 SQUARE" .I . FOOT LOTS PLCM10 FEET,70.70 FEET. AND TO RMuTHE A MINIMUM _ TEN (10) FOOT PNONT'TAED SETBACK FOR THE LIVING ABU OM'- '_ �* 3,000 AND 4.000 MUM FOOT LOTS. y ,•� MOTION: Moved by id Egm:t to valve fall reeding of Ordinance YY� No. 322 and adopt said Ordinance. lbtiou, carried 5-0. Ordinance. Mo K e•.as♦ `5 E. ADVERTI83L PUBLIC HEARINGS y; E1. ENVIRONME11TAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AM] 11 87-05 - CITY OF ._ RANCHO CUCM:ONGA - An amendmant to change the Development District designations Lrom the existing designations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (p.S.p.) for :! all properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to Dear Crean Channel and frm the I -11 Fraaeay to East Avenue within the Foothill Eouaevard Specific Plan area. Staff report by Otto Krouail. Deputy City Planner. Mayor Stout opened the casting for public hearing. There being no response. the public hearing was closed. Deputy City Clerk Aches read the title of Ordinance No. 323. ■., MOM r� m� J=am ORDINANCE NO. 33 (first reading) .- AN ORDINANCE Or THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING .� DEVE.OROM DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 81-09. A REQUEST TO, AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM THE E sma "OC" (GENERAL OOHOERCrAL). "OP" (OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL)., "N" (MEDIUM rIIMSrTY " RESIDENTIAL). ■FC" - (FLOOD CONTROL). "ISP" (INDUSTRIAL AREA' SPECIFIC PLAN. AND "ESP" (ETlW&M SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) , To "FBPN (FOOTHIW. E0ULwARD SYECIriC PLAN) FOR 560 Aims OP _. LAND (BEE EXHIBIT "As) ADIMM TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EE3WEEN DROVE AVENUE AND DEER CREEK C AXIM AND 337WM THE I -15 FREPWAY AND EAST AVENUE WITHIN THE FOOIHILP. DOULE7ARD SPECIFIC PLAN. MOTIONt Moved by Wright, seconded by Ring to waive full reading of Ordinance No, 323 and not second reading for October 21. 1987. Noon carried unanimously 5 -0. # ► e a a • ry S. OFF -SITS PUBDIVISION DIRECT70M SIGNS - An amendment to Section 14.20.065 of the Rancho Cucamonga rlpal Coda pertaining to off -site subdivision directional signs within planned communities. Staff report by Dan Colezan, Sr. Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vast Steven Ford, William Lyon C=psny, said they would like to continue the sign program and that the flags would help sales. Mayer Stout closed the public hearing. Mayor front stated he agreed with the proposed amendment for signs, but bad a probtrm with the flags with the e,ceptin, of the sales office. Counailmember Wright agreed with Mayor Stunt. Deputy City Clark Adams road the title of Ordinance No. 309-A. ORDINANC NO. 309-A (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA. AMMENDING TXTL1 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO 'IGNS MXMTI0111 Moved by Ring, seconded by Buquat to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 309 -A and eat second reading for October 21, 1587. Motion carried 5-0. • V a tt �H� d siN Js '= City Council Minutes a October 7, 1987 Page 14 ORDINANCE NO. 33 (first reading) .- AN ORDINANCE Or THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING .� DEVE.OROM DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 81-09. A REQUEST TO, AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM THE E sma "OC" (GENERAL OOHOERCrAL). "OP" (OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL)., "N" (MEDIUM rIIMSrTY " RESIDENTIAL). ■FC" - (FLOOD CONTROL). "ISP" (INDUSTRIAL AREA' SPECIFIC PLAN. AND "ESP" (ETlW&M SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) , To "FBPN (FOOTHIW. E0ULwARD SYECIriC PLAN) FOR 560 Aims OP _. LAND (BEE EXHIBIT "As) ADIMM TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EE3WEEN DROVE AVENUE AND DEER CREEK C AXIM AND 337WM THE I -15 FREPWAY AND EAST AVENUE WITHIN THE FOOIHILP. DOULE7ARD SPECIFIC PLAN. MOTIONt Moved by Wright, seconded by Ring to waive full reading of Ordinance No, 323 and not second reading for October 21. 1987. Noon carried unanimously 5 -0. # ► e a a • ry S. OFF -SITS PUBDIVISION DIRECT70M SIGNS - An amendment to Section 14.20.065 of the Rancho Cucamonga rlpal Coda pertaining to off -site subdivision directional signs within planned communities. Staff report by Dan Colezan, Sr. Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vast Steven Ford, William Lyon C=psny, said they would like to continue the sign program and that the flags would help sales. Mayer Stout closed the public hearing. Mayor front stated he agreed with the proposed amendment for signs, but bad a probtrm with the flags with the e,ceptin, of the sales office. Counailmember Wright agreed with Mayor Stunt. Deputy City Clark Adams road the title of Ordinance No. 309-A. ORDINANC NO. 309-A (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA. AMMENDING TXTL1 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO 'IGNS MXMTI0111 Moved by Ring, seconded by Buquat to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 309 -A and eat second reading for October 21, 1587. Motion carried 5-0. city council Minutes October 7, 1987 *„ Page 15 e M. mmIRONI(KHTAL ASSESSMENT AND y2CDORIA comma [ITT y �L: AmENDHINP 87 -02 - g WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to change the land use and seeing dealgnstiam d• from Medico 43 Brelling units per acre). and Meditat -High (14-24 duelling units per acre) Residential to Loa- Madlin Residential (4-0 dwelling units per acre) for a 24.67 sere parcel within the victoria Planned C&wuaity, located at the northeast career of victoria Park Lam and Milliken Avcuae - APN 202- 211 -13 and 14. Staff report by Scott "by. Associate Planar. r y Mayor Stout asked Mr. M+rl&y if this would lessen the dowity by about 100. Mr. Murphy stated yes. `µ is Mayor Stout opened the saaciag for public hearing. Addressing Council roar Scaven Ford, William Lyon Company, stated his reasons why he wanted the density lowered. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. _.. ' CouncUseaber Wright said she comaeaded the William Lyon Company for down A' seeing. ;W. d Councilramber King stated he wan in favor of the Lyon Company request. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -549 _} .4 RESOLUTION Of THE CITI COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R1NPH0 WC/u9NGA. CALIFORNIA. DENYING VICTORIA ODMUOKI'IY PLAN A.IMUCIIR NO. 87 -02, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGMATIONS FROM MEDIUM (4-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND x' MEDIUM-HIGH (14-24 IVELLINO OHMS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TO +• LOW--MEDIUM 83SIDBLtf1AL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 24.57 ACRE PARCEL WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMOOHM . LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST OORNER OF VICTORIA PARR LANE AND NILLXIUM AVENUE - APO: 202- 211 -13 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to bring back an Ordinance for first reading approving the William !.ym Company's request. Motion carried ! -0. E4. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANNEXATION NO. 6 FOR DR 87 -01, LOCATED AT 11288 ARROW ROUTE, TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3. v ' C 1 ,a: a' ac" and a City Council Hinu:se s October 7, 1987 - Page 16 RESOLUTION 110. 87 -550 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITT COUNCIL OF TOE CITX OP RANCHO CUCAIONOA- ORDEAIIC Tog WORR IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 6 10 LANDSCAPE�XkXCTENANC8 DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL murNEEE'•S REPORT FOR DR 87 -01 vx .: B. HESOLUTION 'i D. 87 -551 A RESWUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE ';ITT OF RANCHO COCAIONOA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 31 TO STREET LIOUTTN3 NAIRMIANCd DISTRICT NO. I AND ACCEPTING TEL' FINAL ENG=M'S REPORT MR DR 87 -0' RESOLUTION NO. 87 -551 A RESOLO 70M OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RAIICNO COCAIONGA. ORDEPMU ME HORR IN CONNECTION WITH ANUM120H N0. 4 TO $TAM LIGHTING NAn=NANCE DZa:BICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINERR'B REPORT FOR OR 87 -01 Staff report by Leuven Wasserman, City liemgar Mayor Stoat opened the meeting for public hearing. The -e being no response, the public hearing was cloawd. MITIONt Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution nos. 87 -550. 87 -551, and 87 -552. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). a a a a a a P. PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. APPEAL OF STAFF DECISION TO Rnnww T .. vanTAm Tt fun ry eas neon e. a>o, mewtang./ start mort by Russell Maguire, City Engineer. Mayor Stout asked how mach it would coat to rmove tho island. nr. Maguire said it would be between $3,000 to 64,000. Councilmemter Wright brought up the issue of street widths with and without the median. I City Council Minutes, October 1:'1907 Page 17 Comzilmembsr Bmquet also askei questions on dewign dimentiuns of a street. Mayor Stout empresved his concerns for the fire department Brining access auto !ids street with their big ladder truck if the median i.sland stayed, w Key" Stout opened the muting for public hearing. Addressimg Cenci wares lady Cundercon, 9269 Monte Vista, Am presented a petition to Council. Shr also read a letter from Thomas and Mane Mcirughlin who supported leaving the median island in. p Two Smith, 9247 Monte Vista, addressed Conseil and aid she was in favor k of leaving the media&. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilmeaber Wright Salt it was an eyesore, but Cel_ might it mi be a Lacard if it was removed. ma ed. She felt a low intesnancr lendoceping project could-be pur in to beautify it. Coanellmember Ring felt at should be retained. Ea questioned the safety if it won rmwed, but did not know if it should be planted. Ro felt reflector, or painted curbs should be installdd. Councilmamber Brown did not know if it should be beautified because it would role* the reoident's tares through a landscapi•g district. 1 Councilmembar Buquat felt it should be retained, but was not sere ludreepiug wen the answer. He felt a redesign of the median chould take plat". Mayor Stout agreed that this was a., urancal situation, but felt reflectors would help. He also agreed that a beautifiuti+e program world be a good idea if the residents would wane: into a landa,.1,1ng astintenauce district. LOTIONS Moved by ping, oecouded br Buquat co retain the median inland, temporarily install reflectors and/or point the curbs. Engimeeriag to contact residents to sea if they wwtld be willing to establish a landsaplog maintenance district and for staff to imeoti;Ate rades,£m of the median Island. Notion carried unanimously 3 -0. s e e e e e P2. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public Searing we* cloud. Deputy G tv Clerk Adams read the title of Ordl str, No, 124, City Council - Minute`s' . October 7. 1987..- Page SB - •r^ ORDINANCE NO. 324 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TAR QTr COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANOHOA, CALIrOMIA.- AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE ' +; RANCHO CU;ANDWA MUNICIPAL CODE RWARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED : ±� ,4 LIMITS UPON CEETAIN CITr 67RMTS ` v ' IOTIONt Moved by Ring, seconded by Stoat to raive fall reading of- Ordicance No. 324 and set second reading for October 21, 1987. Motion carried 5-0. �y ,F f f 4 f f f f G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS + ,(^ G1. USE OF CONDEMNATION iV OBTAIN OPP -SITS SAS@OD7f8 YOA TENTATZ96 TRACT N0. " 13650 - eR86N9iEw BST TBS - A staff regnant for City Co®c11 nation 1 -� concerning the see of possible condemnation proceedings to'obtain on off -site drainage easement necessary for the dove ?opmt of proposed Tentative Tract No: 13650 located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue .• (APR 207- 201 -30, 41, 42, and 43). Staff report by Joe Stoma, Associate Civil Engineer. A City Attorney, Jim Markman. also gave more information on this item. •, a Mayor Stout ope"d the meatiog for public hearing. There being no reeponse. the public hearing wan closud. NOTION: Moved by Utout, seconded by ring for staff to proceed with condemnation proceedings and refer back to the Planning Cosmismica if T necessary. Notion "tried unanimously 5 -0. f a a f f a H. COUNCIL BUSINESS 4 r No Sums submitted. f f f a a a I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NRIT MEETINO I1. Councilmaaber Ring voul/ like for the Red Bill Lake subcommittee to report at the next meeting. I2. Mayor Scoot requested the offer by the County to assist the City with x financing of the library be placed on the next agenda. 3e stated that 7; Nupervinor Mikela will also be at that meeting. ;s •r f a a f f a +• 1 t U A r 5aFg ,;I, -7 ill.KnI 4 ?Ac AV 'eX 14 Jv� COMMMMON31MM THE PiMLIC J, '7r- CCUMrmicctiOU irate �4"do-fic�a Clio OBblic. a a a a T, K. AWOUPimm MTIONI Moved by adjourn. Mati,� unaulmormly 5-0. mvatinj•4djairttjd.mj��qjjo �cairliid v Respactfully submitted, Debra Adams Deputy City Mark Appravadt a A \� i OEM �r November 18, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO OVER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kincho Cucamonga met on Wedresday, November 18, 1987, in the Lions Parl Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayo) Dennis Stout. Present were Councilmembers: Deborah N. Brost, Charles J. Buquet 1.1, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright (arrived at 7:35 p.m.) and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also piesent were: City Manager, Lauren N. Lasserman; City Attorne„ James Markman; City Clerk, Beverly Authelet; Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; Administrtive Services Director, Jim Hart; City Planner, Brad Buller; Deputy City Planner, Otto Kroutil; Senior Planner, Dan Ibleman; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Senior Civil Engineer, Barrye Hanson; ldministrative Assistant, Duane Baker; Senior Administrative Assistant, Hark Lorirer. R t ♦ • f > B. ANIIaUNCEMENTS /PRESENTITIONS City Clerk Authelat announced that Consent Calendrr Item No. C23 the date for the setting of the public hearing should be changed from Omcember 2, to December 16, 1987. k City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman, announced that Consent Calendar Item No. C15 the maximum fee should be 46,495 to be paid from tas tax funds. Mr. Wasserman also requested a closed session at the close of tie meeting for the discussion of personnel matters, specifically item C11 on the Consent Calendar. C. CONSENT CALENDAR Cl. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 11/4/87 and 11/11/87 and Payroll endinq 10/29/87 for the total amount of $2,475,50:%.82. C2. Approval to authorize allocation of SIO,000.00 from General Fund unallocated balance to City Facilities Account $245 -7044) for the purchase of ' " additional telecommunications equipment for the City's Emergency Operations "* F Center (EOC). a" S :r h.' Irv.:._... 1' Tl • •_ r City Council Minutes November 18, 1987 Page 2 : C3. Approval of disbursement of $33,417.06 to General Telephone Company for undergrounding of telephone services alOng Arrow Route east of Baker Avenue in conjunction with the Arrow Route -Baker Avenue Storm Drain and Reconstruction Project. C4. Approval to accept all bids as submitted and award the contract (CO 87 -188) for the Traffic Signal and Safety Li,lhting at Haven Avenue at Civic Center Drive Improvement Project to the lowest responsiole bidder, Hovey Electric, Incorporated, for the amount of $70,752.00. C5. Approval to execute Extension Agreement (CO 84 -218 A -2) with San Bernarctino County for reimbursement of Contract Landscape Maintenance Services performed on County flood control areas. C6. Approval to adopt Resolution summarily vacating a drainage easement affecting the northeasterly 30 feet of Lot 12, Tract 9350, located between Peridot on the north anc Demons Channel on the South. .i RESOLUTION NO. 87 -611 'vF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 11 CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A DRAINAGE i EASEMENT AFFECTING THE NORTHEASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 12, TRACT 9350 C7. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12873, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between a Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Paragon Homes, Incorporated. RESOLUTION N0. 87fi12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL W.? OF TRACT NO. 12873 :8 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for MDR 87 -32 located on the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by Frito -Lay Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 87513 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -32 . =i City Council Minutes- November 18, 1987 `< Page 3 C9. Approval of Map, execution of Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and ;mprovement Agreearnt and Improvement + Security for Tract 13444, located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by The William tyon,COmpany. RESOLUTION NO. 81-&4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT + SECURITY, AND rIMAL MAP OF TRACT M0. 13444 RESOLUTION NO. 87-615 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF APFROVAL OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT NO. 13444 CIO. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13052 (on- site), located on Base Line Road Nest of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by William Lyon. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -616 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E %TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13052 (ON SITE) CI1. Approval of staffing reassignments, reorganization and salary adjustments in the areas of Community Services, Historic Preservation, Assistant City Manager, Trail; Committee, and the Redevelopment Agency. (Item removed - to discuss in Closed Session.) C12. Approval to execute the Drainage Acceptance Agreeaent (CO 87 -189) submitted by Grigsby Development, Incorporated, in conjunction with development of Tract No. 13542 -1, located southerly of Wilson Avenue and ea,terly of Haven Avenue. C13. Approval to accept the bid as submitted and award the contract (CO 87 -190) for the purchase of a dump truck, to the lowest responsible bidder, Dieterich International Truck Sales, Inc., in the amount of 546,988.15. C14. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 87 -191) for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Donald P. Graber and Janice Y. Graber and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9786 Arrow Route (Phase I). city Ccuncit minutes November 18, 1987 - . Page 4 " RESOLUTION NO. 87.617 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ,1 CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT- FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC+ NY IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM DONALD P. GRADER AND JANICE Y. 't GRADER, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME CIS. Approval to award and execute a- Profesoional Services Agreement -(LO 87 -192) °a with Sanderson and Associates, Inc., to prepare Topographic, Design Survey for ,,, Pecan Avenue, Catalpa and Various Streets.,- The maximum feeds $6.495.00 to be i paid from Gas T4x Fund. .. C16. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO.87 -193) with BSI Consultants, Inc., to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for •f 19eh Street Improvements from Vest City Limits to Jasper Street. The - maximum ° Ace is $32,500.00 to be funded from Systems Development Fund. C17. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 87194) with Jeffrey'e and Associates Fiend Services to prepare Right -of -Way Appraisal- Acquisition Service for the improvement of 19th Street from West city Limits to Jasper Street. The maximum feu is .$22,500.00 plus escrow fees, title, litigation guarantees, etc., to be paid from Systems Development Fund.- CIA. Approval to award and execute a Professlonal.Services Agreement (CO 87 -195) with R. J. M. Design Group to perform Landscape Inventories and - Master Beautification Plans for Archibald Avenue and 19th Street and to design and produce construction drawings for entry monument valls at various locations for a fee not to exceed $112,700 to be paid from the Beautification Fund. An additional 10% contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. •- C19. Approval to execute Change Order No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement (CO 96 -045) with Morse Consulting Group for the Reconstruction of Victoria Park Lane fo- an additional fee of $11,302.00 to be paid from the Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 2 with a loan from the Beautification rund. C20. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: CUP 83 -22 - located on the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $32,000.00 �`$�3 -'Y :ew' .- •Y�;r• Mc4it7" + -.id.5 r_y -i!'� -.q .._ __. _...�•�. �-a:-. -- ,r __,�rA 5�,..t ;.�.i.� NS �'� :rte "'�e�,;yr'.� K:- 1� : =.r'"_ ,� ,._. -: ....,,.= •�x:{� -� °. ,i;, ->k wr'�- .. •; '= Yd�:. ?.L!ii�..'��"T��`." is r ' - City,Cnuncli Minutes-;'' f Noveaber °38, 198TME— _ r?z ! "Page 5 ; V, 41 RESOLUTION NO. 87 -618 ��f?•: A RESOLUTION 0 THE.CITY COUNCIL OF SIZE CITY OF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ' .• -'' CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE' PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTVFOR CUP 83- 2jjrAND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OVA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE ,WO ,S = OR 86-26 - located on Red (Aik north of•Jersey Bouievard.= -' Faithful Performance' -Bond (Street) $66,000.00 *, y... RESOLUTION NO« 87619 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1101(rA. - 'S'� CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 'OR 86 -26 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ° .. C21. Approval to accept Improvements and Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond -` for Tract 10045 located at Haven Avenue and Hidden Farm Road. • ^-- - Maintenance Guarantee•Bond (Street) $ 8,200.00 y' C22. Approval to release cash deposit: ' zr A. In the amount of $500.00 to Rancho Community Friends Church for Future Tenant luentification Sign 4.1; 7077 Etiwanda Avenue. 8. In the amount of $2,500.00 to Kauffman 6 Broad for Model Home Sales ? Office for Tract 9480. me C23. Set the public hearing for Decvmter 2, 198? - Approval of intent to vacate + a portion of the non - vehicular acce'ts rights, as dedicated on Parcel Map 6617, located on the east side of Haven Arenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 87620 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIrORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE HOII- VEHICULAR ACCESS RISHTS OF A PORTION 'OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. ' C24. Set public hearing for December 16, 1987 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 12873, located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. I as Annexation No. 40. 1 City Council Minutes November 18, 1987' - Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 87-621 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, FOR ANNEXATION NO. 40.TO'LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT' NO., I RESOLUTION NO. 87 -622 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION, TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION, NO._ 40 TO LANDSCAPE. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING " -AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C25. Set public hearing for December 16, 1987 - Approval to annex DR 87 -22 and CUP 85 -37 (pcl. 3 of PM 9487) to Landscape Maintenance District No. -•3 as - -^ Annexation Mo. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -623 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 87-624 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATIOP AS ANNEXATION N0. 10 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C26. Set public hearing for December 16, 1987 - Approval to Annex DR 87 -22, OR 86 -42 and CUP 85 -37 (pcl. 3 of PH 9487), Tract Nos. 12873, 13279 and 13443 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 33. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -625 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FUR ANNEXATION NO. 33 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 4,a DO was =' W- . City Council Minutes.,., November 18 1987 OR Pagel 2 RESOLUTION No. 87.626 A RESOLUTIO.4'OF THE CITY•COUNCIL OF THE-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING' ITS.-INTENTION TO ORDER THE, -, 14 STREET LIGHTING. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT' NO. I .,,AN 4.;5ESSMEMT DISTRICT:. DE,,,IGKATIIIG�SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION MO.*• 33 TO STREET LIGHTIlib'MMNTEMMCE DISTRICT NO. I;',PURSUAMT 'TO 'THE LANDSCAPING AXDCLIGHTIftGL ACVOF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR-HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C27. Set public hearing for December 16 1987 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 12873, located on the east side of Haven Letween Lemon Avenue and Banyan 4Street to Street Lighting Maintenance - District No. 2 as Annexation No. 24. U, RESOLUTION NO. 87.627 A RESOLUTION OF III: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 24 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRACT NO. 2 n RESOLUTION RO. 87428 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION To ORDER THE ANNEXATION To STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 22 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 24; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C28. Set Public hearing for December 16, 1987 - Approval to Annex Tract 13279 and 13443 (Victoria) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 6. RESOLUTION MD. 87-629 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION 110. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 was ■ City Council Minutes November 18, 1987 ' Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 87.1;30 r� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION 110. 6 TO ,r STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND y PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C29. Set public hearing for December 16, 1997 - Approval to Annex DR 87 -22, DR 86 -42 and CUP 85 -37 (PCI.'3 of PN 9487) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 6. , ,RESOLUTION"NO. 87-631 .c A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ,._ CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ERGIMEER'S REPORT FOR— ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO STREET LTSHT1NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 a ' RESOLUTION NO. 87 -632 a; y, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO OMER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 6 TO ,. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6. rURSUANT TO THC LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACr OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AMC PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve 'he Consent Calendar minus Item No. 11. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. R* f f t f D. CONSENT ORDINANCES City Clerk Authelet read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 327, 330, and 2118. D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - amen vent to T t e of the Municipa cuoe pertaining to the definition of State mandated recycling facilities and the criteria for design, location and operation of such facilities. ■ ,..,y _ , city council Mimttes November 18 1987 Page'g ORDINANCE NO. 327 (second reading) 3 -mss d AN ORDINANCE OF TH1, °CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 17.04.080. TO THE RANClIO CUCAMONGA _ MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE REVIEW AND ESTAOLISHMENT OF RECYCLING FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUUd6ONGA RESOLUTION NO. 87 -S76 A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPLOYING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDME47 87 -01 ADDING SECTION 17.04.08E TO THE OEI.LOPNENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA PERTMNING TO STATE MANDATED RECYCLING CENTERS WITHIN COMMERCIAL AND OU'FICE ZONES 02. WUNICIPAL CODE ANENINtEHT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - M amendment to Chapter 0. of a Rancho Cucamonge municipal Code by amending section' 10.44.130 and adding a new Section 10.44.140 authorizing the immobilization and /or removal of vehicles from public streets and highways, parking facilities and handicapped parting spaces. OPDINANCE NO. 330 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 10.44 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONSA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.44.130 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 10.44.140 AUTHORIZING 'HE IRMOBILIZATION AND /OR REMOVAL OF VEHICLES FROM PUBLIC STREEt5 AND HIGWIAYS, PARKING FACILITIES AND HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACLS, BY DESIGNATEP CITY EMPLOYEES ..•.m, `�.. FUG - � amendmenc cr. the Development code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ord nance 711, to revise Section 17.12.040 pertaining to upgrade 0 parking aliocation standards and to require enclosed garages for all apartaent and condominium prglrcts; and, to revise Section 17.08.090 pertaining to upgrade of General Design Guidelines for parking areas in cultlple family development; and, to revise Section 17.08.040 pertaining to upgrade of Rtnimum residentit, unit size. a S a S City Coouncil Minutes November 18, 1987 -. Page 30 • ;,„ M t� 0RDIM'MCE NO. 211 -A (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 3;.5CN0 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROvING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -02. 164ENDING SECTION 17.12.010 PERTAINING TO PARKING ALLOCATION STANDARDS AND ., ENCLOSED GARAGES, SECTION 17.08 1.90 PERTAINING TO GENERAL DESIGN :- GUIDELINES FOR PARKING AREAS, AND SSECTION 17.08.040 PERTAINING TO MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL UNIT SIZE OF TIE DEVELOPMENT -CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKONGA. ORDINANCE NO. 211 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded bv•Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance Nos. 327, 330, and 211 -0 along with Resolution Ito. 87 -576 and adopt the -same. Motion carried unanimusly 5••0. s- fw i �t E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87 -01 - BCE DEVELOPMENT - Review of a Development Agreement for a commercial design center and food park consisting of 10 buildings totaling 144,950 square feet located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN 208- 351 -28. Staff report by Dan Coleman, Sentof Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Jack Corrigan, representing BCE Development, who presented the concept of the design center and showed slides of other design centers in Southern California. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Mayor Stout expressed agreement with the Planning Commission in Its conclusion with respect to design and architecture. With respect to uses, he felt the Planning Commission was looking to the City Council for direction. Councilman King was not in favor of using the development agreement. He falt It should be used for very narrow uses and that it could become abused. Councilwoman Brown concurred with staff and Planning Commission but was in favor of using the development agreement in this case. W' v- City council Minutes November IG, 1407 Page 11 [ } Councilman buquat expressed he was oppoced to an amendment to the ISP. "Although we should encourage innovated uses,- he felt this was a commercial center which was being sold as a design center. Councilwoman Wright stated that she •elt there were other sites in the City where these types of shops cwtd locate. Mr. Harkpan. City Attorney, stated that those uses which the Council was satisfied W�tn could be specifically spelled out in the,developaant agreement. Mr. Corrigan Mated he had no protlem with fir. Harkatn'•s suggestion. He further stated there ware enough uses to zelact from. lie did not oppose Council removing those izRms which they were not comfortable with. Councilman Duzuet expressed that he was more concerned with uses that were. gtnaral comcarcIaI uses. more Council concurred that the following definitions of various commercial uses'"be.—"__ eliminated from the Foothill Commercial Dosign Center. 1. Art store cnd supplies. 2. Musical instrument stores. 3. Specialty bcokstores. 4. Specialty wine store sales and storage. S. Custom party design stores. 6. Custom shoe repair. 7. Designer ahoy stores. The following .mefinitions of commercial usr.s were left within the Foothill Commercial Desion Center. 1. Telephone stores. 2. Art Gallery. 3. Bathroom accessories and supply stores. 4. Carpet, drapes stores. S. Custom floor coverings. 6. Kitchen accessories and supply stores. 7. Plants and accessories. - 8. Wallpaper and paint centers.' Mayor Stout concurred with removing these items especially since we could do as ¢ Mr Harkman suggested adding other uses by Resolution. r :L.0 �w a. City Council Minutes November 18,'1987,,:. ' Page 12 City Clerk Authelqt read the title of Ordinance No. 331. ORDINANCE NO. 331 (first reading) AN OF.OIHAHCE-OF IRE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRO7ING, THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED 'DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. CONCERNING THAT FRCPEhTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BO!JLEVARO AND SPRUCE AVENUE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. SAN BERNRROM _COUNTY, CALIFORNIA' AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND. CM CLERKC70 EXECUTE THE SAYE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquot tc. approve the development agreement with the folliwing aaendments and waive full reading of Ordinance No. 331: On page 3 of the development agreement add itecl no. d "Any other use may be added to the permitted use list or condi'Mcnal permitter` use list through the CUP process.' (This would. gv through the Planning Coavlssion and come to the City Council by appeal) -" and set second reading for Deceeber 2, 1937. Notion carried 4 -1. (King no.) f f f f f f E2. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION 111TH: A. ANNEXATION NO. _8_FOR OR 81,-14 AND OR 86-76 IND'STJ RIALrCOWAERCIALI TO Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being nn response, tLe public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -633 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TYE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 0 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENAN;E DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR JR 86-14 AND OR 06 -36 NOTION: Moved by Buquet, secanded by King to approve Resolution No. 87 -633. Notion carried unanimously 5 -0. f f f f f . ■ i A YJ aA w e > frfti None submitted. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS G. CITE MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS City Council Minutes November 18, 1987 Page 13 G1. UPDATE. ON MOBILE HOME RENT STABILIZATION - Progress report as to the development of the Mo a Tome Park ca and other rent stabilization options. Staff rcport by Mark Lorimer, Senior Administrative Assistant. - Mr. Lorimer reported that progress has been achieved, and it looked like they would be able to reach a mutual agreement. ALTION: Council r.^ceived and filed the report. , f f f t 1 f G2. REQUEST TO SiIAP LAMD AT ARCHIBALD AND 19TH STREET FOR LuNTR1BULlen9 In AIo :1- OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TH ARuHiuALu REALIGNMENT - Report on a request to swap -` endl t at Will be used for Route 30 right-of-way in exchange for relief from contributions in aid of construction for the Archibald Realignnent. (Item �. continued from 10/21/87) Staff eport by Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Councll were: Gary Mitchell, representing Brock Development, stated that the land involved would be the offramp for Archibald from the freeway. Alnn Brock, of Brock Development, stated they had approached Caltrans on this item also. After a brief discussion by Council, the following motion was made. MOTION: Moved by Stout. seconded by Brown to direct staff not to proceed with the land swdp. Aition carried 3 -2. (No - Buquet, King.) 1 f f 1 f f u3 MAINTENAHLE D1]IR16I MYH1 G: FUN URYI IRL YRVJW I] - UpaaLe On use Vi a110G aLeY Landscape Maintenance D strict and Lighting Maintenance District monies for Capital Projects. Staff report by Duane Baker. Administrative Assistant. '9 � :. -_ _ - J - ..� r.Y";.. = a;ga+i, ,°.7 _ � - , ' • 1117 � �y={��S 7 `7 .5 v 1 '°- City Council Minutes, 11987 November_ 18, - _, Page 14 Staff report by Lauren N. Wasserman, City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: - Jim Precious, from the Rochester tract, stated he was the one who had sent a letter to the Mayor regarding this matter. The people did want the appoint his successor. landscaping done on Rochester Avenue as soon as possible. Council discussed the feasibility of having an idvisory election in order to see_ ACTION: Council concurred in having the board recommend Mr. If the people were willing to pay for Vie maintenance of the landscaping. Councilwoman Brown sugget•ted that staff hold an open house to explain what the successor. process would be prior to the election. • 3 - ACTION: To have staff proceed with an advisory mail election. Then," if the results were in favor of establishing a maintenance district, staff proceed- ' with the establishment of a 1972 maintenance district. - -_ G4. USE OF CONDEMNATION TO OBTAIN RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMEN b FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 137 2 - .C.aC. 0 Et PM ENT - taff request for L ty Count IT rection concerning the use of posslble condemnation proceeding. Staff report by Barrye Hanson. Senior Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve in concept the possible future condemnation action to obtain off -site rights -of -way necessary fur the development of proposed tentative tract number 17742. Motion carried unan'mously 5 -0. " GS. APPOINTMENT OF FOUNDATION BOARD MEMBER . Consideration of a selection process to fill a current vacancy on the Rancho Cucamonga Community Founddtion. •" Staff report by Lauren N. Wasserman, City Manager. Mr. Wasserman stated that Gary Schafer had resigned and that Council needed to appoint his successor. ACTION: Council concurred in having the board recommend Mr. Srhafer's successor. a s ' i - City Council Minutes - -- November 18, 1987 Page 15 G5. MINIMUM UNIT S' - ININIMI!1 LO SIZE MARKET STUDY. Mark Smith representing Peat Marwick /Goodk;n , ssente the study. He stated that there would be no action tonight, since the Iten was back on the Planning Cocmisslon agenda for discussion. They have not discuss -i this; only heard the presentation. ACTION: Council received and filed the report. e e e s e e G7. STATUS OF STAFF'S FINDINS OMIT ILITIES WITHIN TK VICTORIA PLANNED eOMWTNY. i7repGwLMeY FACBra UU1 ler, 1,iry anner. Councilwoman Brown reported the issues of: + 1. No conawnity facility. 2. Lack of a green belt. 3. Lack of quality of day care. 4. Thought there was going to be a church. S. Traffic. The issue of possibly making this a park was net eccnomically feasible to the residential area. A letter had been received clarifying the issues and that all of them had been :feared up except for the traffic issue. Regaafing this, Councilwoman Brown requested that the Public Safety Coaaaission look at designating a crossing guard at this site. Mr. Wasserman suggested that this go through the usual procedure - through the traffic engineer first, then have a study made. If the area warrants it, then It could go through the process for approval. ACTION: Council concurred to have the traffic engineer conduct a study and then proceed through the process for approval fur a crossing guard at this site. H. COUNCIL BUSINESS H1 OISCUSSI0N OF SETTING WORKSHOP DATES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2000 PROJECT (GOAL-Sr ACTION: Council concurred in setting December 9 at 5 30 p.m. for dinner to be held in the Lions Park Community Center. e♦ e e s e E .z ' , 2� I ty CCUecil Ninutes luvember 18, 1987 , 1114e- 16 I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None submitted. f Y f f Y f J. _CO!_NIINICATISNS FROM THE PUBLIC llal Ledfer, 11616 mount yanir Court, asked Council if at the Intersection -af Hilliken and Highland there could be a traffic light placed. Russell Maguire, 1aty Engineer, Ytate& it was in this year's budget. It had been designed and •sas before Caltrans for approval. K. AOdOORWENT The Council adjourned at 10:05 p.m to an Executive Session to discuss consent calendar ixem number at 9919 and also io discuss potential litigation, blocking of The city Council reconvened at 10:14 p.m. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Stout to approve Consent Calendar Item Number 11. Motion carriei 4 -1 -0. (Hright no.) carried unanimuslY U- 0etThe meeetingbadjou nedtat 10 :15np.m.e meeting. Notion Respectfully submitted. Beverly Authelet City Clerk Ia