Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-01-23 - Agenda Packet - HPC / HP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 23, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher— Munoz letcher_Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca _ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on items listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Approval of minutes dated December 12, 2012 • Approval of minutes dated January 9, 2013 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JANUARY 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 2 11 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/PLANNING COMMISSION Approval of minutes dated December 12, 2012 Approval of minutes dated January 9, 2013 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION A. UPDATE REGARDING THE CHINATOWN HOUSE LOCATED AT 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD B. VACATION SUBVAC221 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA —A request to vacate 1,347 square feet of existing City right-of-way at 8393 Foothill Boulevard, on the south • side of Foothill Boulevard east of San Bernardino Road — APN 207-571-75. Related File: Foothill Boulevard Improvement Project#800-99-15, from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue, VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION C. UPDATE REGARDING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2 (ORAL REPORT) VIL PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 and Variance DRC2012-00135. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 2013. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JANUARY 23, 2013 C,IICANIONGA Page 3 E VARIANCE DRC2012-00135 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 124 feet on proposed Lot 9 of Tentative Tract Map 18823, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 2013. F. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 - TREVEAR HOLDINGS LLC - A request to allow for an 8-foot tall wall on Lot 2 within Tentative Tract 18823 for compliance with the proposed Fire Protection Plan on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky court -APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 and Variance DRC2012-00135, CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 2013. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX HOMES - A residential subdivision of 53 single-family lots on 40.12 acres of • land in the Very Low Residential district of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road-APN-0226-081-05 and 06. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 9, 2013. VIII. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION IX. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 17, 2013;at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to • ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION .. AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA a_ RA 110 JANUARY 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 4 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for • distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director, AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6.00 p.m , except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,265 for maps and $2,379 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting January 23 , 2013 B A G D, E, and F - ------------, - ----------- - i- ,i a m � w acs m •_f•• I ! c d E a ° m z — c 19th St t i Base Line '� Base Line C urch ! Church c m Foothills . Foothill ! v m d Arrow I Arrow I — L Jersey w ! 8th w d Q (9 y c 6th w 6th ` ' m N 4th = _ 4th gem C: (Update Report) Meeting Location: Landscape Maintenance city Hall p 10500 Civic Center Drive District 2 Fri THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF C=RANCHO ONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 2012 - 7:OOPM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 1o5oo Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance TOOPM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher x Munoz X Wimberly x Oaxaca A Additional staff present: Jeff Bloom, Deputy City manager/Economic&Community Development; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS . None III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION ' COMMISSION Approval of minutes dated November 28, 2012 HPC Consent Calendar Adopted 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) • IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/PLANNING COMMISSION Approval of minutes dated November 28, 2012 PC Consent Calendar Adopted 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECEMBER 12, 2012 Page 2 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ' A. UPDATE ON THE CHINATOWN HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner presented the report and noted copies of the City's letter to CVWD were provided to the Commission on the dais. (copy on file) Report Received and Filed. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. • B. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19397-CALDWELL LAND SURVEYS FOR BCI COCA- COLA BOTTLING CO - A request to subdivide an existing parcel of approximately 25.12 acres into three parcels within the General Industrial District and the Industrial Park District located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 6th Street-APN: 209-411-33.This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, minor land divisions. Dominic Perez, Assistant Planner presented the staff report. He gave a brief PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer, said the Utica Avenue completion improvements must be installed prior to any development occurring on either parcel. Mr. Kelleher stated he represents Coca Cola and was the engineer involved with preparing the map. He said they understand that Utica must be completed before anyone can develop. He said it is not their intent to develop it themselves. Chairman Howdyshell opened the Public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19397. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: OAXACA ABSTAIN: NONE carried 4-0-1 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECEMBER 12, 2012 Page 3 C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00932 - ELIAS ALFATA FOR GABRIEL MITRI -A request to operate a used car sales office of 284 square feet and vehicle display area of about 3,800 square feet at an existing commercial site of 37,000 square feet (0.85 acre) that is comprised of an automotive repair (Building A) and body shop (Building B) with a combined floor area of 5,676 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 8517 Grove Avenue; APN: 0207-222-05. Related files: Site Development Review DRC2012-00933 and Variance DRC2012-01123. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00933-ELIAS ALFATA FOR GABRIEL MITRI -A request to modify the parking lot in conjunction with a proposed used car sales office and vehicle display area at an existing commercial site of 37,000 square feet (0.85 acre) that is comprised of an automotive repair (Building A) and body shop (Building B) with a combined floor area of 5,676 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 8517 Grove • Avenue; APN: 0207-222-05. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00933 and Variance DRC2012-01123. E. VARIANCE DRC2012-01123 - ELIAS ALFATA FOR GABRIEL MITRI -A request to allow a reduction in the average landscape depth along Arrow Route and Grove Avenue in conjunction with a request to operate a used car sales office of 284 square feet and vehicle display area of about 3,800 square feet at an existing commercial site of 37,000 square feet (0.85 acre)that is comprised of an automotive repair(Building A) and body shop (Building B) with a combined floor area of 5,676 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 8517 Grove Avenue; APN: 0207-222-05. Related files: Site Development Review DRC2012-00933 and Variance DRC2012-01123. Mike Smith,Associate Plannerpresented the staff report. He presented a brief PowerPoint presentation(copy on file) In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, Mr. Smith indicated an estimate of room for about 10 cars to be displayed. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, Mr. Smith said light and glare issues should be minimized in that the applicant is required to provide a photometric plan for approval, the light standards have a 15 foot maximum and the fixtures are angled with recessed lamps. He said if the neighbors have future concerns, we can always contact the property owner to correct the problem. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, he noted that security fencing was discussed, but the applicant did not provide a satisfactory solution. Chairman Howdyshell noted that the applicant was not present. She opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz said the proposed project does improve the existing landscape somewhat and is a • move in the right direction. Commissioner Wimberly said the plan as proposed is an improvement to the area and it does not appear to create a negative impact to the neighborhood. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECEMBER 12, 2012 Page 4 Vice Chairman Fletcher thought the original plan for a carwash was much nicer, but this proposal is a minor improvement of what is there now. Chairman Howdyshell expressed a desire for more landscaping. She said she hopes this will generate some business for them and the community. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00932, Site Development Review DRC2012-00933, and Variance DRC2012-01123 as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: OAXACA ABSTAIN.' NONE carried 4-0-1 VII'. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND • PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Munoz thanked the City and Staff for the holiday party. Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager of Economic/Community Development said we are working on the League of California Cities conference for Planning Commissioners. He said it historically fills up and therefore we want to get our reservations in quickly. He reminded them of the Special Joint Council/Commission Workshop on December18b. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned at 7:38 PM • • MINUTES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO C,UCAMONGA MEETINGS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 9, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California • I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell A Vice Chairman Fletcher x Munoz A Wimberly X Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner;Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer;Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Ed Dietl and Luana Hernandez of HPARC asked to delay the demolition of the Chinatown House. They mentioned that a delegation was here to speak regarding the request and preservation of the house and the role of Chinese Americans in our community. A delegation of 10 individuals representing the Chinese American Cultural Alliance(CACA), the Chinese Historical Society of Southern California, and the Asian & Pacific Islander Americans in Historic Preservation (APIAHIP) spoke regarding their request to delay the demolition of the Chinatown House to explore possible alternatives such as relocation, temporary stabilization, and preservation. They noted the structure represents an important • part of their heritage and is integral to the history of the area with respect to the construction of the water system and local agriculture They said it is the last remaining Chinatown structure in the Inland Empire and it is unique in that the structure was built with materials locally available. The speakers and their general comments are listed below: HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO JANUARY 9, 2013 C,UCAMONGA Page 2 Eugene Moy, VP of the Chinese Historical Society of California said this is a threat to last remaining structure of all Southern California Chinatowns which supported workers who contributed to the wealth/growth of the area. He said the technical problems could be resolved and time could allow for a plan to preserve and restore this historical resource. Pamela Langmak stated her family has been in the area since 1864 and George Day was her uncle and she heard many historical stories over the years. She said she would like to save and restore the structure as we are losing our national history. Beth Langmak said she lives near the structure and she too heard stories of the Chinese Americans contribution. She said the local children learned local history of our area by hearing about this structure. Paul Perez a member of the Chinese American Citizens Alliance(CACA)and several other organizations said he believes in the goals and mission statement of many organizations and in the community service performed. He said he tries to help instill pride and patriotism in the youth and a by product is less crime. He said he wants to save the structure and what it represents. He said much can be done when we work together and he wants to do what is reasonable and prudent in terms of preservation efforts. He said a plaque will not have the same impact. • Vincent Trang said he is part of the Los Angeles Chapter of the CACA. He asked to delay the demolition and save the Chinese American heritage. Albert, a member of the Los Angeles Chapter of the CACA said this structure is the remaining sole presence of Chinese Americans in the Inland Empire. He noted the hardships of the Chinese that were in the area. William Tao, said if the structure is destroyed, what remains of Chinese Americans'presence in the area will be gone;it is the symbol of American spirit. He noted the show, "Things That Are Not Here Anymore"and how the removal of the structure also removes the connection to the past and the presence of the Chinese Americans and their contributions to the agriculture of the area. He said the structure is unique in the use of natural building materials. He asked to delay demolition to look for alternatives. Miriam Nakamura Kwan said she is a Japanese-Chinese-Korean and is involved in various groups. She said she tries to find every Chinatown when she is traveling. She said she disagrees with CVWD's determination of the structure not having significance. She said the artifacts found on the site are housed at the John Rains House. She asked for time for them to figure out what to do. Christina Park said she is a graduate student of LISC's Historic Preservation program. She suggested the building could be relocated and given temporary stabilization until other forms of preservation could occur under CEQA. (no name given)said she grew up in a large family in Alhambra. She said she has attended prestigious schools and she has a PHD in Educational/Psychology Leadership and she received her education because she was given opportunities to learn about whom they are and their heritage. She said it is not just about preservation of the structure but what it symbolizes. She said"history is born"and we preserve to have a place to see, feel, and touch. She said when she visits sites with only a plaque;it is difficult to connect with the significance of the site. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said the Planning Commission cannot legally address items not on the • agenda and therefore they could only receive their comments tonight. • HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO JANUARY 9, 2013 CUCA.MONGA Page 3 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Approval of minutes dated December 12, 2012 Continued to January 23, 2013 3-0-2 (Howdyshell, Munoz absent) IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/PLANNING COMMISSION Approval of =23, December 12, 2012 Continued to J3-0-2 Howd shell, Munoz absent) V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION A. UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-00156 • Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner gave an oral update. The report was received and filed. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00616-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of detailed Site Plan, modifications to buildings A, H and J to include roof-mounted solar panels, and covered recreational vehicle parking canopies with roof-mounted solar panels for Phase I of a previously approved recreational vehicle storage facility on 9.87 acres of land in the in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound 1-210 and southbound 1-15 interchange at 13670 Victoria Street - APN: 0228-011-31. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003- 00048, Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00618 On April 14, 2004 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 (Phase 1). The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration (Section 15162). • C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00618-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES-A request to modify the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 to permit changes to the Site Plan, modifications to buildings A, H and J to include roof-mounted solar HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO JANUARY 9, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 4 panels, and covered recreational vehicle parking canopies with roof-mounted solar panels for Phase I for a previously approved recreational vehicle storage facility on 9.87 acres of land in the in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound 1 -210 and southbound 1-15 interchange at 13670 Victoria Street - APN: 0228-011-31. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003- 00048, Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 and Development Review DRC2012-00616. On April 14, 2004 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 (Phase 1). The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration (Section 15162). Donald Granger, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates said they changed the zoning of the site and the access point. He said it is important to recharge our resources by using sustainable methods. He said he concurs with the conditions. Vice Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing. • Letha Elsden, a nearby resident,said it is a great project. She said her issue is that the exterior lighting on the site shines into the second floor of their home. She said the property owners have installed shields that help. She- came today to see what the solar canopies took like. She said she would like to reduce the exterior lighting and address possible glare from the solar panels. She said the project serves as a good wind block. Vice Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing. Chuck Buquet responded that his client will follow up on the light shields and will be responsive. Commissioner Wimberly said the project is nice and already in place. He said the DRC worked with the applicant to ensure the lighting would not be a problem. He said the canopies are lowered to address glare. He said it should be a good completed project. Commissioner Oaxaca said he saw the proposal at DRC and appreciated the client's willingness to think beyond with solar panels and to have sensitivity to their neighbors. He said he-hopes for more projects with sustainable features Vice Chairman Fletcher agreed with all the comments and complimented staff on the report He said the applicant should have a good response in the market Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Wimberly carried 3-0-2(Howdyshell, Munoz absent)to approve the Resolutions of Approval for Development Review DRC2012-00616 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00618. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW-DRC2012-00726 - HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC -Site plan and architectural review of a 306 unit • HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO JANUARY 9, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 5 rental condominium development on 19.25 acres located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Medium High Development District(14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan-APN: 0227-151-49 and 50. Related Cases: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18856, General Plan Amendment DRC2012-00727 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00759. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18856 - HOMECOMING VAT TERRA VISTA, LLC-A request to subdivide the 19.25 acre project site for condominium purposes for the development of a 306 unit rental condominium development located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Medium High Development District (14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan - APN: 0227-151-49 and 50. Related Cases: Development/Design Review DRC2012-00726, General Plan Amendment DRC2012-00727 and Minor Exception DRC2012- 00759. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts • for consideration F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2012-00727 - HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC -A request to change the land use designation from Mixed-Use to Medium High Residential for 19.25 acres located on the side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Terra Vista Community Plan-APN: 0227- 151-49 and 50. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. G. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00759 - HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC-A request to increase the permitted wall heights from 6 to 8 feet related to the development of a 306 unit rental condominium development on 19.25 acres located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Medium High Development District(14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan -APN: 0227-151-49 and 50. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and gave a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that the standard conditons have been amended and have been placed before the Commissioners for their consideration He said a letter was received from the Department of Transportation, District 8 and a response to that letter was received from LSA. Staff believes LSA has appropriately addressed the issues. A letter was also received from a resident regarding Homecoming tenants parking in the surrounding neighborhood. John Young gave a PowerPoint presentation. Rick Polhamus, the landscape architect said the site is developed around a central core/main street. He said it- has a pedestrian trail system that connects to the prior development phase located across the street. Bryan Sevy, KTGY Architects commented on the enhancements made since their meetings with the DRC.. HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO JANUARY 9, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 6 Commissioner Oaxaca asked for the applicant to comment on the email received regarding the parking. Mr. Young said they look to law enforcement to enforce parking but to his knowledge they always have parking available. He said more parking is now required and they are pleased to exceed the City code by 25 spaces. Vice Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing none, Vice Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wimberly thanked the applicant and staff working together to meet all the requirements and the concerns of the DRC He said his concern was 360 degree design and he is pleased they followed through as requested. Commissioner Oaxaca agreed. He said he walked through it with the Lewis team prior to DRC. He said he appreciatde their efforts and look forward to its completion. Vice Chairman Fletcher also thanked staff for the report and applicants work. He said he Ickes the project and it has exceptional amenities. He said it is developed at a lower density than what could have been allowed and exceeds the parking requirement. He said there was concern about the articulation of wall planes but overall it is • in context with the development,it has elegent simple lines. He said it will probably have the same success as the Santa Barbara project. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 3-0-2(Howdyshell, Munoz absent)to approve the Resolutions of Approval for Development Review DRC2012-00726, Tentative Tract Map SUB TT18656 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00759 with amended conditions. The Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2012-00727 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823-JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court -APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 and Variance DRC2012-00135. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. I. VARIANCE DRC2012-00135 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 124 feet on proposed Lot 9 of Tentative Tract Map 18823, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court-APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. J. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513-TREVEAR HOLDINGS LLC -A request to allow for an 8-foot tall wall on Lot 2 within Tentative Tract 18823 for compliance with the proposed Fire • Protection Plan on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue • HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND F PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES O JANUARY 9, 2013 GA Page 7 Sky court-APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 and Variance DRC2012-00135. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, said staff received a letter from the County Department of Public Works with comments on the CEQA Documents. He said in light of the comments, staff is requesting a continuance to the January 23, 2013 meeting. Vice Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing for those that may be unable to attend the January 23, 2013 meeing. Hearing none he asked for a motion. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca carried 3-0-2(Howdyshell, Munoz absent)to continue the hearing for Tentative Tract Map 18823, Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 as requested to January 23, 2013. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX • HOMES -A residential subdivision of 53 single-family lots on 40.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road -APN:0226-081-05 and 06. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner noted a letter from the County Department of Public Works and comments on the CEQA Documents. He said in light of the comments, staff is requesting a continuance to the January 23, 2013 meeting. Vice Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing for those that may be unable to attend the January 23, 2013 meeing. Hearing none he asked for a motion. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca carried 3-0-2(Howdyshell, Munoz absent)to continue the hearing for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 to the January 23, 2013 meeting. VII. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Oaxaca requested an update report from staff regarding the Chinatown House if any new information is received from CVWD or if the Fire District has an interest or comment. Commissioner Wimberly asked forstaff to comment regarding the deadlines with the Red Tag and permit pulling. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner said they have 60 days to comply, they can request an extension; as yet they • have not requested the permit. She said they still have to submit documentation items for review prior to that. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he also wants a report regarding the Chinatown House. He asked if staff could delay the permit so more time for comment can occur. He said it is unfortunate these groups did not get involved before this and suggested they may be able to get together as a group to assist in funding it and move it for a HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO JANUARY 9, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 8 satisfactory solution for all. He said the Planning Commission has never been invited or had the opportunity to tour it. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said it is Red Tagged now and is an unsafe structure. VIII. ADJOURNMENT 8:30PM • • UPDATE REGARDING THE CHINATOWN HOUSE LOCATED AT 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD. AN ORAL REPORT WILL BE GIVEN AT THE MEETING. Item A STAFF MPQRT ; ENGINEERING SERVICE,,,DEPARTMENT DATE: January 23, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION SUBVAC221 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to vacate 1,347 square feet of existing City right-of-way at 8393 Foothill Boulevard, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of San Bernardino Road — APN 207-571-75. Related File: Foothill Boulevard Improvement Project #800-99-15, from Grove Avenue to Vineyard Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the proposed vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council forfurther processing and final approval. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On May 5, 2010, the Redevelopment Agency agreed to purchase 917 square feet of permanent highway easement and 35,312 square feet for a temporary construction easement from the owner of Assessor's Parcel Number 0207-571-75, Michael Fournier of MDF Property Management. This additional right-of-way • was necessary for the recently completed realignment of Foothill Boulevard between Grove and Vineyard Avenues. As part of the Purchase and Sale agreement the City agreed to vacate another 1,347 square feet, as shown in Exhibits C and D of said agreement, upon completion of those street improvements. Phase 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Improvement Project, the portion between San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue, was completed in June of 2012. As part of those improvements, a 7-foot curb adjacent sidewalk and 3-foot retaining wall with tubular steel fence on top was constructed east of the easterly drive approach, extending to the east property line of Mr. Fournier's property at 8393 Foothill Boulevard, which abuts the Pacific Electric Trail on the northwest side. Curb adjacent sidewalk continues beneath the trail bridge over Foothill Boulevard to the intersection with Baker Avenue. The property owner agreed to assume full responsibility for landscaping and maintaining the area south of the retaining wall. The General Plan calls for a street right-of-way of 120 feet (60 feet measured from the centerline) with a parkway width of 13 feet for this portion of Foothill Boulevard. However, because of an existing building and grade issues in developed properties along Foothill Boulevard and the need to minimize right-of-way costs, City Council acting as the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) approved the Foothill Boulevard Improvement Project with a street right-of-way of 55 feet, measured from the ultimate centerline, and a parkway width of 8 feet for this portion of Foothill Boulevard. On April 7, 2010, the City Council/RDA approved this reduction in the right-of-way and determined these improvements to be ultimate, thus meeting the intent of the General Plan by providing for both safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Therefore this vacation conforms with the General Plan. Since the portion of the existing right-of-way proposed to be vacated has been superseded by the relocation of Foothill Boulevard, a summary vacation is allowed under the Streets and Highway Code of the State of • California. Item B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VACATION SUBVAC221 January 23, 2013 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, • G' z4r�� Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ:BM:rlf Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Improvements Exhibit"C" - Legal Description Exhibit "D" - Plat • • B-2 VICINITY MAP I �ul d Ul [ii I � •I TLSO AVE /i 24TH ST lLsT N W \ �� N �❑���------< SUMMIT AV `�? EMO O� VE � �` ❑ HIGH D A y 30 I_I T 19TH \. 30 � VICTOR PARKN B LINE D ooCHU HST� N > RRA ¢ PROJg'CT FOOTHI BLVD a • _ 66 SAN BERNARDINOw iosoo ors. RRO RTE— �� > ARROW w I > z BNSF RR 0 •— \ 6TH ST ao II `s F—��� � .4TH ST .._. .. .._.. . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PHASE$.FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO VINEYARD AVENUE x.r.s. EXHIBIT "A" B-3 m »Ya4 r T FOO fHILU BOULEVARD J x F r �I-Tl TLI i `.....r e" , /.i• .r � .,m'� .-�- ' 'i mel ti� 'a. m raFs*S"R i. ,n��_.:.e+al-'` " _ _ r.a; i£ _i •i}ir - :IRk3v• •-�J!l ow— .tea¢,r n _ - i �._- _ __ _ 7 �y •�� " . _. _ .r .J. %���.3 t�- - ,nom � � :. '`�Ili�>- ' _•�/-'`�,•.�'-_ 40" / / %/��J�. �_ �� � `�.•` PE2 .!`m <c � Vey ITT T- LF.4Etp T /o} �/a I 9•f r- _ sx iup,�Llc•ic.rt. 1,2 IT ./%`�µ�''`^'":,.'"$����;•".:.,' . -.�D;;!'.��e�;i�°��,/ ➢F��' .._ I ,.prow"`:� ��r:::�; _".:'�:°" ��.: n.�(.".0. Q�Qf TI— IRI ii�7H�:=.o ,,.•�`� ,%' i ,�a,D,��,.� ,6' /- �,-t' . w-0a�� " r.�`�``i 4'n — _,, . r. .x K< CITYpOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rO• �T '�,9b - :•1\ cOG BRIDGE m v.rw�rza Q uu m anx m-s n R^ m6 v,�q. ,a.•m �y - au.�.0 x.0 ; SOU IH SIDE GRADING/REIAI ING WALL FLAt! �r HILLPWLEJARD /- ..rr.p<rr.,<,� c00T rm <a,aa,,.,,<•,.ary,o,< 4' - -�-L— ••_ Z wrt•a�,._ G ".Iw ( u rzs— o-p <w,n�cr ,.,, 1 R.r A.s o T:..a4W:rte-w.o �rvrv,A,» --� �sr r= �....ra 1 $1\. e<•u urzo.,,w.' �p,OETAL A-RET_AAJA*ROCK WALL I�AL�ipN '^ t9]9_ _ NORTI A 1'e= NTS CITY OF ITEM: SUBVAC221 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-: Improvements ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT • LEGAL DESCRIPTION GRANTOR: MDF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT APN: 0207-571-75 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,BEING A PORTION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1999-0401819 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; THENCE S. 89'57' 52" E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAND A DISTANCE OF 46.89 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,229.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S. 06° 46' 20" W.;THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 060 15' 48"A DISTANCE OF 243.66 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE S. 890 29' 28"E. A DISTANCE OF 5.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE S. 890 29' 28"E.A DISTANCE OF 23.16 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, • CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,450.00 FEET,A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S. 01'42' 08"W.; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 52' 43"A DISTANCE OF 80.33 FEET; THENCE N. 89°49' 25"E. A DISTANCE OF 104.79 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAND; THENCE N. 29° 12' 26" W. A DISTANCE OF 6.45 FEET; THENCE N. 89'29' 28" W. A DISTANCE OF 205.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 900 00' 00"A DISTANCE OF 3.93 FEET; THENCE S. 00'30' 32"W. A DISTANCE OF 3.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 1,347 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT D ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. • EXHIBIT "C" Page 1 of 2 B-5 PREPARED BY: PROFEss oks • DAN GUERRA &ASSOCIATES 10271-B TRADEMARK STREET w m RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 97 730 R.0 '9z2 A CNR �P An DA E. GUE DATE C El EXPIRES 3-31-2011 • • Page 2 of 2 B-6 EASEMENT FOR STREET, HIGHWAY &c REI-.ATED PURPOSES PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION a o 0=9 0=900 R=2.50' '00 ¢ PI 29-12'25" 1Y1OOT ILC BLVD N 6.45' �P.0.C. N 00'30'32" — W�> N 89'29'26" W 205.77' 0=06'15'4 =2229.00' -- L=243.66' D=01'52'43" N 89'49'25" E / N 89'57'52" W R=2450.00' 104.79'' / 46.89' S 00'30'32" W L=80.33' / (RAD.) I N 89'29'28" LY N 89'29'28" W 23.16' m 5.28' x i P.O.B. 1-0: _ I A.P.N. 207-571-75 z� OF PJF;-CION 'Ec. n r Crl INE BERN -AN AFIUINJ � I M.B. / V � G < �6 Z I // / 1'• // _ �e Tc.E�9 o ay Exp. 3131 11 =60' ST CIVIL �P 3��®sp 'F OF CALY o / // PAGE i OF 1 4• / Important Update about Rancho Cucamonga's Landscaping Needs for Landscape Maintenance District i Winter 2013 What is Landscape Maintenance District 2? ■Funds landscape services to maintain the safety and character of local neighborhoods, schools, and parks ■Located south of the I-210, west of Etiwanda Ave., west of the I-15, and east of Haven, and north of Base Line (the "Victoria" neighborhood) .. amp ■ Has been in place for the past 30 years to maintain neighborhood landscaping Parkway and median landscaping 44 M a rVI ■ Maintains almost 8 million square feet of landscaped areas located throughout the neighborhood ■ Keeping our neighborhoods clean, attractive, and safe helps protect property values and ensure Rancho Cucamonga remains a desirable place to live and do business. Park Landscaping & Lighting ■ Maintains six parks, including playgrounds, y. sports fields, park Y , ' restrooms, and lighting for safety and evening use. 0'rt". c A Maintaining Park Safety ■ 20,000+ children participate in local sports programs in these parks ■ Funds are used to: t . Maintain lighting to keep parks safe andwell lit at night Ensure that playground equipment A. remains safe ow Maintain sports fields to reduce risk of injury Paseos and Trails for Recreation and Safe Routes to School ■ Maintains 5.5 miles of paseos, providing families, t children, and seniors with beautiful, well lit recreation ` r . and safe paths to school ' ■ Ensures that paseo '^ lighting is maintained, ;►,�► which is particularly s important to keeping neighborhoods safe. ` I ■Maintains clean, safe community trail connecting multiple schools, parks, and paseos What is the issue ? ■ Without additional funds we can no lonLyer maintain local landscaping for Landscape Maintenance District 2 SEs,, .: '' '` ■ Costs rising for energy, water, materials and labor needed to preserve neighborhood landscaping ■ Rates have stayed the same since 1993 ■ City has improved efficiency and cut costs Without additional funds , critical cuts needed ■ Without additional funding, we will no longer be able to water the many grassy areas along the neighborhood streets and paseos. ■ Once the grass as been eliminated, primarily dirt will remain. ■ Overall maintenance will also need to be reduced to a very basic level. 7imi r` - -., per+ Aft � 4J 1if e S/J+ L ,• What can be done ? ■ We are working to ensure residents /businesses receive this new information and are able to provide feedback. At this time, no reliable sources of revenue exist to maintain or improve current service levels. ■ We are working to get more input from homeowners and local businesses on their priorities for neighborhood landscaping. ■ Potential options include: Potential revenue measure for local landscaping needs Proceed with these maintenance service reductions How could additional funds support the needs ? ■ Prevent the elimination of grassy areas along local streets and paseos, maintaining neighborhood character and property values - ■ Restore park and landscape maintenance to an "A" level of service ■ Maintain and repair lighting along paseos and in parks for safety J � r ■ Keep ground cover, vines & 14 rG shrubs consistently neat, eliminating current overgrowth How could additional funds support the needs ? (continued) ■ Aerate/dethatch turf to improve health of grass ■ Maintain facilities, site " M furnishings and other non- - r landscape elements in the park ■ Improve services to maintain and improve appearance and health of landscaped areas ■ Explore more drought tolerant landscaping for area Next Steps . . . ■ Gather feedback from homeowners and local businesses on their priorities for neighborhood landscaping F T" ■ Share information on the .LV facts, including what the City has done to - - cut/control costs and inform residents of upcoming landscape service cuts ■ Measure resident opinions on the options: Reduce maintenance, or reconsider a potential revenue measure for local landscaping needs What can you do to help ? > Fill out the feedback form now and hand it in. Tell us K ' ' �• your landscaping priorities! _ r' Do you belong to other ` organizations that need ' this information? Let us know, - 'mow a... y�- > Sign up to stay informed and help in the future. a ,e \ a For more information . . . www.cityofrc. us/LMD2 LMD@a cityofrc•us Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Maintenance Superintendent (909) 477-2730 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ri DATE: January 23, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 - Jonathan C. Curtis - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single-family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 and Variance DRC2012-00135. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2012-00135 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 124 feet on proposed Lot 9 of the Tentative Tract Map 18823 on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court -APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18741 and Variance DRC2012-00135. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 - TREVEAR HOLDINGS LLC - A request to • allow for an 8-foot tall wall on Lot 1, Lot 9 and Lot 10 within Tentative Tract 18823 for compliance with the proposed Fire Protection Plan on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18741 and Minor Exception DRC2012- 00513. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 18823, Variance DRC2012-01200135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and Standard Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 1.54 Dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences and Vacant Land; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda North Specific Plan) South - Vacant Land; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda North Specific Plan) East - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan) • West - Flood Control Basin; Flood Control Items D, E, & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 2 • C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor D. Site Characteristics: The project site consists of two rectangular shaped parcels and one puzzle-shaped parcel totaling 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcels into 19 single-family residential lots. The parcels are mostly vacant with two partially-built homes on two of the three parcels and located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Blue Sky Court. To the north of the project are vacant flood control land and three single- family residences, to the south is vacant land, and to the east across Wardman Bullock Road are existing single-family residences, and to the west is the flood control basin. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The original subdivision of lots, which included Parcels 0226-081-14 through 16, was approved by the County of San Bernardino prior to incorporating this portion of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2003. Parcel Map 15550 was later recorded in 2003, and this parcel map subdivided Parcel 0226-081-14, a 4.76-acre lot, into 3 parcels. These parcels are currently 0226-081-17 through 19. Parcels 0226-081-15 and 16 are also 4.76-acre lots • and are currently not a part of this proposal. Both parcels have partially built homes that were permitted by the County, but never finaled. The City of Rancho Cucamonga issued permits to the owner of record in June of 2006. The permits were issued for four of the five single-family residences being constructed at that time. The residence on Parcel 0226-081-18 was permitted and finaled by the County. On September 14, 2011 this project was presented to the Planning Commission at a workshop as Pre-Application DRC2011-00724 (meeting minutes and Staff Report attached). The Commission heard the details of the proposal and the issues concerning this site. The issues were that Lot 10 on Exhibit B of the Site Plan for the Pre-Application did not meet the required lot depth of the Development District, and an equestrian trail is required at the rear of the properties and not the front as they are on Lots 9, 10 and 11. The Fire District raised concerns with the length of the cul-de-sac for Street A as it exceeds the maximum length; however this was resolved with access to Blue Sky Court via an access easement at the end of Street A. B. General: The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Within this themed area the applicant is required to construct walls that correspond with the other walls in the surrounding area. The community wall along the perimeter of the site along Wardman Bullock Road will consist of a stucco covered block wall with pilasters wrapped in brick veneer spaced every 40 to 60 feet. Both the wall and pilasters will be topped with concrete caps. Access into the housing tract will be • D, E, F- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS • January 23, 2013 Page 3 accomplished at two points. Both proposed points of access are off Wardman Bullock Road and the streets will be cul-de-sacs with gated entry points. The proposed subdivision consists of 2 lettered lots and 19 single-family, residential numbered lots and a dedication to the public right-of-way on Wardman Bullock Road. A tentative parcel map was recently approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2012, creating a puzzle-shaped remainder parcel that is the northern portion of this subdivision. Most lots meet the required average width of 90 feet and minimum depth of 150 feet. Only Lot 9 does not meet the minimum depth as it is only 124 feet deep. The block wall on the north tract boundary of the proposed tentative tract map requires a Minor Exception to increase the height of the wall from 6 feet to 8 feet as part of the Fire Protection Plan. The Minor Exception will be processed concurrently with the tentative tract map. A Minor Exception is also required for portions of the perimeter walls on Lots 9 and 10 to accommodate the grade changes on the south side property lines. The maximum height of these retaining walls will be 2 feet, 9 inches (2'-9") with a 6-foot (6'-0") garden wall atop to provide security along the neighboring trail. The proposed subdivision also has two existing partially-built homes on proposed Lots 12 and 15 that are driving the design of the subdivision and limit the size of Lots 11-16. These lots will not be able to accommodate equestrian amenities as they will not be able to meet the minimum requirements for locations of corrals from residential units. The trails are located at • the rear of all the lots except these lots as they will not be allowed to keep horses on site. The equestrian lots have a minimum of a 15-foot wide equestrian trail easement that runs along the west and north tract boundary and are proposed to be 21 feet wide for trail and emergency access. The west and south side of the trail will have three-rail PVC trail fencing. The rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. Trails along Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road will be 15 feet wide with three-rail PVC trail fencing along the street sides of the trail. Access to the private trail along the rear of the lots is yet to be established. The applicant of this proposed subdivision is requesting to access the trails via the tract to the south. Permission has not been granted to date. Staff has placed a condition in the Resolution of Approval which requires the reciprocal access agreement be obtained prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. C. Design Review Committee: Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the project on November 6, 2012 and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with the recommendation that they work with property to the south for an access agreement. D. Technical and Grading Review Committees: The Technical Review reviewed the project on November 6, 2012 and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) (Howdyshell, Wimberly, Reynolds, Bloom) reviewed the project on December 12, 2012. Because of the lack of a quorum a recommendation could not be made at that time. The committee members present felt that the project met the requirements of the Trail Implementation Plan. The item was • rescheduled for review by the TAC at their regular meeting held earlier this evening (January 9, 2013). Because the project is being reviewed just prior to the Planning Commission D, E, F- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 4 • meeting, an oral report of their recommendation will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting tonight. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 17, 2012 at Summit Intermediate School; only one couple attended the meeting. The couple resides on Blue Sky Court adjacent to the project. They inquired about the design and layout of the project and appeared satisfied with the developer's responses. G. Mitigated Negative Declaration Letter and Response: On January 9, 2013 prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received a comment letter from the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works. The letter expressed concerns regarding drainage and biological issues. Staff asked that the hearing of January 9 be continued to the following meeting date (January 23, 2013) to allow time for the applicant's consultant-and biologist to prepare an adequate response. A response letter has been attached to the report for Planning Commission's review. The response letter addresses the concerns and indicated no new impacts were identified; therefore no new analysis or mitigation measures were required. H. Minor Exception DRC2012-00513: The applicant submitted a Minor Exception request as part of their application to subdivide the project site because a specific development standard is not being met. Within the residential district requirements of the Development Code, residential development standards require decorative masonry block walls be a maximum of 6 feet in height. The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum requirement on Lots 1, 9, and 10. • Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Minor exception is to allow creative design solutions and to accommodate unique site conditions. The Development Code allows for a Minor Exception procedure for the consideration of increasing the maximum wall height by 2 feet, pursuant to Section 17.16.110-1. This application contemplates a wall for Lot 1 along the north property line to be 8 feet in height and another retaining wall with a garden wall on Lots 9 and 10 to be calculated at 7 feet 4 inches. In order to grant a request for a Minor Exception, a series of findings must be made. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That the proposed development is of sufficient size and is designed so as to provide a desirable environment within its own boundaries Facts: Increasing the wall height by two feet will provide better fire protection on Lot 1. Increasing the height on Lots 9 and 10 with a retaining wall of 2 feet 8 inches (calculated height of 1 foot, 4 inches) will maintain privacy along the southern lot lines. 2. Finding: That the proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Facts: The applicant is proposing a residential subdivision as part of this application. There are residential developments to the north and east of the project with a • D, E,F- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS • January 23, 2013 Page 5 proposed residential tract proposed to the south. This application will allow for the privacy and improved fire protection for future residents. 3. Finding: Any exceptions to or deviation from the density, requirements, or design standards result in the creation of project amenities that would not be available through strict adherence to Code provisions (e.g., additional open space, protection of natural resources, improved pedestrian connectivity, public plazas). Facts: The Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege or amenity not available to other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow a wall to provide fire protection for Lot 1 and a 6 foot tall privacy wall for Lots 9 and 10, with the addition of the retaining wall. These are amenities other parcels in the area also enjoy. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Minor exception will not adversely affect the interest of the public or the interest of the residents and property owners in the vicinity of the premises in question. Facts: The increased heights will be located along the tract boundary and will be • architecturally compatible with the existing walls in the area. 5. Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Facts: The granting of the Minor Exception helps encourage new development by allowing the applicant to provide privacy and fire protection to the specified lots that is enjoyed by the other lots in the area. 6. Findings: The Minor Exception is the minimum required in that it allows the specified improvement to occur, but does not provide additional development rights. Facts: The granting of the Minor Exception does not provide a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district as all properties shall meet the minimum fire protection allowed by a particular plan and be allowed to have the same level of privacy as other residential lots in the area. 1. Variance DRC2012-00135: The applicant has submitted a Variance request as part of their application to subdivide the project site because of a deficiency of the lot depth. Within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, residential development standards (ENSP §12.2.1 (Table 10)) require each lot to meet the 90-foot minimum lot width and 150-foot minimum lot depth requirement. Here, all lots exceed those minimum development standards, with the exception of Lot 9, which proposes a 197-foot lot width and • 124-foot lot depth. D, E, F- 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823. DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 6 • Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Facts: The lot meets the minimum requirements for lot area. The lot is oriented with the long side parallel to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street which makes the lot depth short of the required 150 feet by 26 feet. The current orientation was utilized to design the tract around an existing single-family residence constructed north of the proposed lot along the south boundary of the project site. The project will still meet the requirements for the private street. The lot will still be able to provide all the amenities that the other lots in the area contain but will be oriented differently. 2. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. • Facts: The lot was designed to meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code but it is oriented opposite of the lots to the north and west but similar design to Lot 10. The lot is oriented with the long side parallel to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street which makes the lot depth short of the required 150 feet by 26 feet. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Facts: The applicant can meet the spirit of the Code by providing a lot that has a similar measurement as adjacent lots. With the exception of the minimum lot depth requirement, the proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision provides for the development of homes that will be architecturally compatible with surrounding properties, and provide the potential for equestrian use consistent with surrounding properties. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot sizes and depths achievable within the constraints of the property, and the minimum lot depth has been achieved on all lots except Lot 9. Accordingly, a strict interpretation and enforcement of the minimum lot depth requirement would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the district. • D, E, F- 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS • January 23, 2013 Page 7 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. Facts: The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot depths achievable within the constraints of the property and creates an equestrian community compatible with adjacent developments. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the district because the configuration of the proposed subdivision is compatible with Lot 10. The lot will also have to meet all the setback and height requirements of the district. 5. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts: The grant of the Variance will only reduce the lot depth and all other Development Code requirements will still have to be adhered to all other requirements. J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, • biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Je re . Bloom Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development JAB:SF/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 9, 2013 Exhibit B - Letter from the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works • dated January 8, 2013 Exhibit C - Letter of Response from Jonathan Curtis dated January 16, 2013 D, E,F- 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513— JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 8 • Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2012-00135 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 • • D, E,F- 8 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 9, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 - Jonathan C. Curtis - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single-family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 and Variance DRC2012-00135. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2012-00135 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 124 feet on proposed Lot 9 of the Tentative Tract Map 18823 on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18741 and Variance DRC2012-00135. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 - TREVEAR HOLDINGS LLC - A request to • allow for an 8-foot tall wall on Lot 1, Lot 9 and Lot 10 within Tentative Tract 18823 for compliance with the proposed Fire Protection Plan on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18741 and Minor Exception DRC2012- 00513. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 18823, Variance DRC2012-01200135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and Standard Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 1.54 Dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences and Vacant Land; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda North Specific Plan) South - Vacant Land; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda North Specific Plan) East - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan) • West - " Flood Control Basin; Flood Control EXHIBIT A D, E,F- 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 9, 2013 • Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor D. Site Characteristics: The project site consists of two rectangular shaped parcels and one puzzle-shaped parcel totaling 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcels into 19 single-family residential lots. The parcels are mostly vacant with two partially-built homes on two of the three parcels and located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Blue Sky Court. To the north of the project are vacant flood control land and three single- family residences, to the south is vacant land, and to the east across Wardman Bullock Road are existing single-family residences, and to the west is the flood control basin. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The original subdivision of lots, which included Parcels 0226-081-14 through 16, was approved by the County of San Bernardino prior to incorporating this portion of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2003. Parcel Map 15550 was later recorded in 2003, and this parcel map subdivided Parcel 0226-081-14, a 4.76-acre lot, into 3 parcels. These parcels • are currently 0226-081-17 through 19. Parcels 0226-081-15 and 16 are also 4.76-acre lots and are currently not a part of this proposal. Both parcels have partially built homes that were permitted by the County, but never finaled. The City of Rancho Cucamonga issued permits to the owner of record in June of 2006. The permits were issued for four of the five single-family residences being constructed at that time. The residence on Parcel 0226-081-18 was permitted and finaled by the County. On September 14, 2011 this project was presented to the Planning Commission at a workshop as Pre-Application DRC2011-00724 (meeting minutes and Staff Report attached). The Commission heard the details of the proposal and the issues concerning this site. The issues were that Lot 10 on Exhibit B of the Site Plan for the Pre-Application did not meet the required lot depth of the Development District, and an equestrian trail is required at the rear of the properties and not the front as they are on Lots 9, 10 and 11. The Fire District raised concerns with the length of the cul-de-sac for Street A as it exceeds the maximum length; however this was resolved with access to Blue Sky Court via an access easement at the end of Street A. B. General: The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Within this themed area the applicant is required to construct walls that correspond with the other walls in the surrounding area. The community wall along the perimeter of the site along Wardman Bullock Road will consist of a stucco covered block wall with pilasters wrapped in brick veneer spaced every 40 to 60 feet. Both the wall and pilasters will be topped with concrete caps. Access into the housing tract will be • D, E, F- 10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513—JONATHAN C. CURTIS • January 9, 2013 Page 3 accomplished at two points. Both proposed points of access are off Wardman Bullock Road and the streets will be cul-de-sacs with gated entry points. The proposed subdivision consists of 2 lettered lots and 19 single-family, residential numbered lots and a dedication to the public right-of-way on Wardman Bullock Road. A tentative parcel map was recently approved by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2012, creating a puzzle-shaped remainder parcel that is the northern portion of this subdivision. Most lots meet the required average width of 90 feet and minimum depth of 150 feet. Only Lot 9 does not meet the minimum depth as it is only 124 feet deep. The block wall on the north tract boundary of the proposed tentative tract map requires a Minor Exception to increase the height of the wall from 6 feet to 8 feet as part of the Fire Protection Plan. The Minor Exception will be processed concurrently with the tentative tract map. A Minor Exception is also required for portions of the perimeter walls on Lots 9 and 10 to accommodate the grade changes on the south side property lines. The maximum height of these retaining walls will be 2 feet, 9 inches (2'-9") with a 6-foot (6'-0") garden wall atop to provide security along the neighboring trail. The proposed subdivision also has two existing partially-built homes on proposed Lots 12 and 15 that are driving the design of the subdivision and limit the size of Lots 11-16. These lots will not be able to accommodate equestrian amenities as they will not be able to meet the • minimum requirements for locations of corrals from residential units. The trails are located at the rear of all the lots except these lots as they will not be allowed to keep horses on site. The equestrian lots have a minimum of a 15-foot wide equestrian trail easement that runs along the west and north tract boundary and are proposed to be 21 feet wide for trail and emergency access. The west and south side of the trail will have three-rail PVC trail fencing. The rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. Trails along Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road will be 15 feet wide with three-rail PVC trail fencing along the street sides of the trail. Access to the private trail along the rear of the lots is yet to be established. The applicant of this proposed subdivision is requesting to access the trails via the tract to the south. Permission has not been granted to date. Staff has placed a condition in the Resolution of Approval which requires the reciprocal access agreement be obtained prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. C. Design Review Committee: Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the project on November 6, 2012 and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with the recommendation that they work with property to the south for an access agreement. D. Technical and Grading Review Committees: The Technical Review reviewed the project on November 6, 2012 and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) (Howdyshell, Wimberly, Reynolds, Bloom) reviewed the project on December 12, 2012. Because of the lack of a quorum a recommendation could not be made at that time. The committee members present • felt that the project met the requirements of the Trail Implementation Plan. The item was rescheduled for review by the TAC at their regular meeting held earlier this evening (January 9, 2013). Because the project is being reviewed just prior to the Planning Commission D, E, F- 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513— JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 9, 2013 • Page 4 meeting, an oral report of their recommendation will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting tonight. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 17, 2012 at Summit Intermediate School; only one couple attended the meeting. The couple resides on Blue Sky Court adjacent to the project. They inquired about the design and layout of the project and appeared satisfied with the developer's responses. G. Minor Exception DRC2012-00513: The applicant submitted a Minor Exception request as part of their application to subdivide the project site because a specific development standard is not being met. Within the residential district requirements of the Development Code, residential development standards require decorative masonry block walls be a maximum of 6 feet in height. The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum requirement on Lots 1, 9, and 10. Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Minor exception is to allow creative design solutions and to accommodate unique site conditions. The Development Code allows for a Minor Exception procedure for the consideration of increasing the maximum wall height by 2 feet, pursuant to Section 17.16.110-1. This application contemplates a wall for Lot 1 along the north property line to be 8 feet in height and another retaining wall with a garden wall on Lots 9 and 10 to be calculated at 7 feet 4 inches. In order to grant a request for a Minor Exception, a series of findings must be made. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the • necessary findings: 1. Finding: That the proposed development is of sufficient size and is designed so as to provide a desirable environment within its own boundaries Facts: Increasing the wall height by two feet will provide better fire protection on Lot 1. Increasing the height on Lots 9 and 10 with a retaining wall of 2 feet 8 inches (calculated height of 1 foot, 4 inches) will maintain privacy along the southern lot lines. 2. Finding: That the proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Facts: The applicant is proposing a residential subdivision as part of this application. There are residential developments to the north and east of the project with a proposed residential tract proposed to the south. This application will allow for the privacy and improved fire protection for future residents. 3. Finding: Any exceptions to or deviation from the density, requirements, or design standards result in the creation of project amenities that would not be available through strict adherence to Code provisions (e.g:, additional open space, protection of natural resources, improved pedestrian connectivity, public plazas). • D, E,F- 12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS • January 9, 2013 Page 5 Facts: The Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege or amenity not available to other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow a wall to provide fire protection for Lot 1 and a 6 foot tall privacy wall for Lots 9 and 10, with the addition of the retaining wall. These are amenities other parcels in the area also enjoy. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Minor exception will not adversely affect the interest of the public or the interest of the residents and property owners in the vicinity of the premises in question. Facts: The increased heights will be located along the tract boundary and will be architecturally compatible with the existing walls in the area. 5. Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Facts: The granting of the Minor Exception helps encourage new development by allowing the applicant to provide privacy and fire protection to the specified lots that is enjoyed by the other lots in the area. • 6. Findings: The Minor Exception is the minimum required in that it allows the specified improvement to occur, but does not provide additional development rights. Facts: The granting of the Minor Exception does not provide a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district as all properties shall meet the minimum fire protection allowed by a particular plan and be allowed to have the same level of privacy as other residential lots in the area. H. Variance DRC2012-00135: The applicant has submitted a Variance request as part of their application to subdivide the project site because of a deficiency of the lot depth. Within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, residential development standards (ENSP §12.2.1 (Table 10)) require each lot to meet the 90-foot minimum lot width and 150-foot minimum lot depth requirement. Here, all lots exceed those minimum development standards, with the exception of Lot 9, which proposes a 197-foot lot width and 124-foot lot depth. Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: • D, E,F- 13 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 9, 2013 • Page 6 1. Findin : That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Facts: The lot meets the minimum requirements for lot area. The lot is oriented with the long side parallel to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street which makes the lot depth short of the required 150 feet by 26 feet. The current orientation was utilized to design the tract around an existing single-family residence constructed north of the proposed lot along the south boundary of the project site. The project will still meet the requirements for the private street. The lot will still be able to provide all the amenities that the other lots in the area contain but will be oriented differently. 2. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Facts: The lot was designed to meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code but it is oriented opposite of the lots to the north and west but similar design to Lot 10. The lot is oriented with the long side parallel to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street which makes the lot depth short of the required 150 feet by 26 feet. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation • would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Facts: The applicant can meet the spirit of the Code by providing a lot that has a similar measurement as adjacent lots. With the exception of the minimum lot depth requirement, the proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision provides for the development of homes that will be architecturally compatible with surrounding properties, and provide the potential for equestrian use consistent with surrounding properties. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot sizes and depths achievable within the constraints of the property, and the minimum lot depth has been achieved on all lots except Lot 9. Accordingly, a strict interpretation and enforcement of the minimum lot depth requirement would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the district. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. Facts: The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot depths achievable within the constraints of the property and creates an equestrian community compatible with adjacent developments. The granting • of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with D, E, F- 14 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18823, DRC2012-00135 & DRC2012-00513 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 9, 2013 • Page 7 the limitations on other properties in the district because the configuration of the proposed subdivision is compatible with Lot 10. The lot will also have to meet all the setback and height requirements of the district. 5. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts: The grant of the Variance will only reduce the lot depth and all other Development Code requirements will still have to be adhered to all other requirements. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. • CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Jeffr oom Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development JAB:SF/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Grading Plan Exhibit D - Pre-Application DRC2011-00724 Staff Report and Minutes Exhibit E - Emergency Access Plan Exhibit F - Tentative Tract Map 18823 Exhibit G - Initial Study Part I Exhibit H - Initial Study Parts II and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 is Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2012-00135 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 D, E. F- 15 Y 1 APN Ol'3�OBI 13 rr 4'C ' ZE 14* k co 1 • �i r u I ��s R02 OB t / i SBCFCD .:�i �.���� 2`.� 1 g�-h � - 1 L Y i w §t<bT'y r .i3xY - TH�+,91�^ '��ltt�,j,. '131.E�IDOHFtiDRNE "K *p f. s.� Yxf � • ` < TN,k . �!'l•'` J Yt Y hif.�''A t�.Qd�4� 'y M ., 4'B •�' —__— { • t " �� w.i . � e. � I�r �;��` -ter a i}-' 'l4 -� $ y t blf{gy �' � � 0. u'S6"Y9 f_• .� YSPJ'1.0228-bB1.07 J ° ! x r�p.' �' 1 ! '..i�M9Q3/9�� •-.�- -v � � SBCFCD � r • ;t. �r .Mti lA �t1 A, 5 ��x r 5`xx'� rA, � Rl:� � •� :7 • •!r 0 s - M ♦ a 111 1 � .k ~ � r4 ��4 {{]'J�0226-081 O5/OG.,6�y 2i'S 1 r ._ Y r � i • � • • AS. t� if`t 4 i� FTM Ntr 18701 .t �r y > 3 1 - i a4; • r • ,At t* `. : 'y< yiv 4 � �t " rya r t 1 .c_��r�t.� 1 • ■ �. "'tit.. 3 f ,y.:* T ♦ .., r :: t L"::�.. tA. 'h a 4 4 7:.ryJ ,..•aw. .: 3 VKANTY MAF uc �.' ux o¢¢ �� `. aRt_ ; 1 I 909416 e Arx oa6-oe4o 1 I 9oun9Ax cAuo¢n;mooa co¢aoo¢ lac 1 � WIIII@N CALfO¢MA 060N CO¢¢m0¢ I I A30L®to.W.135" \ .sv 6 I I 0.S 9]0/6EP \\ W f__G SMG[fA lY z\ -- ----- -�------------- LEGEND.-- VL,' 7. r Fcew .e_ A.x oa6-06Rd �.' T,;,RPY Nq `T• �F`I t . < V 1 ucs Go t n�°' I VIL ¢ I t I ¢i 11 ¢' i��� y/ `' LL 1 rvetAan. ..r', rc,: L C! a tr .'-}'i iTa— i':e j 1 vL we® FCmd.'.��i dici MI 17 uc p .1 ro¢90a of Alx yObtrW4o 'a 11 I _ 1 NOTES V 1 TTM No 'IBB23 1 S9KRI.E-NTIAL I. I 11 II 0 1 ,vx oxze-cnol " 1 I �b0a6a 3 1 y a. (VACA11n 1 Alx omo9w .+113., 1 ` -.1'�n v \ \ r i •. �R i ,• 6T�� \' � n\ lig \ �1 p\ .y PREPARED FOR ---'--�-- rt .l. T—r —rT- `5 klj\,�j �� \I„\\rg\\. TREVEAR T , 1 \ ,�'� Y� I HOLDINGS LLC \ / l l' I .',I I T 16 1 1e Y ill + 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA ST..STE.3500 I IALOS ANGELES, 90017 Pel: (213)532- 95 3295 r -1 -1 ILII-n'I I I vy i� a \ I \ FAX: (213)727-3286 _7 y �i f� I \ Y I/L L _J' Irr T — VLS j\L > YY I \ ae` wusr PREPARIDBV: I u.a \ I MACAMRI I II I MACH a 9M ala IL-\ IT, 19rarrAAk r kunnrc 6wGu: r-___ I I \ > \ j' IIIINIIIIIBBIBI __._. �%� SUB-M8823 11.»ow;ayITENTATIVE TRACT No. 18823 y----�`��.JI— -- ----- rAs.atlno-Al �_F- -,,,��,y„y RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 �- --, --- ---- �___J, - SITE UTILIZATION MAP CITY OF BRNOq CUCM106TY6 OOIIlIr OF SAN BERdlAfDNO,STATE OF CALFORV4 SHEET 2 of 8 s.A Inveoanew41e1 .NfOPoan a6'FlB 6BI1Le Alx ouaOaFla ____ VICNTY MAP. Roourm wAu aAs>Fv.Anax z0F" rfiacrel wAu'" oaMmrevla6 GENERAL NOTES +w wo 1936' x r Ill It h;l r mow ----- m±cr soman { ._ l �R MAIEN ®mw� ACO A�v "� M 6sssnaw an a 6A3rt ev,tbener d ! R xn . r I" rtRryryA1E m.l 6m1mm T d l I I peas a d, m 6a.EaxON - gvyy' e¢eAeBBi!-• .I:� f �a�vwx .. .b _ '�iwu.-a esmcr mri rwssrt . 1p•.c�; I f �Avav vwu6:vmr �"�!' 1 __'• __ _ r I t IAoa4f,A®F111 � -@4L�YI! � AA1,r art S .�� `iw.wo��is a0'A1a LEGEND, A AwnaAVA><a );' LEGAL DESCRFTK� t S3, O A. A 2 \ �I w K� t •� t DBING�ENAOI �y V'® ^ t '41 kylnvo�P• I J I Axua:rAianrt h .l e+acnm f 1. rK mmo� C, !�" ,d'OJn 64 R6 PIAINAY IXW ®SwNE 0100 r n_ter r® r r' .� imrAnw mrr:. 3 , 0 19 - �wAu 17 o 18 C,w.i3 l rl.,wnE�at wLr81N0 BENCAaARK. ABBREVIATIONS. 5 �.aw .�..; dPME ��__ UNITY PURVEYORS Art O YwAcr aoivvn ._ r ��Y - '• V .r1 a.gN _ ....r e..... am b A• m ___ ____ a u• t ;amIm WAIai AAW .. DRVE'R ^.....•.+r+ e ® Ir ,i MOCAn amxm .a..,.p...,d lT •, i _ t 'DE R1vAurt e..,.. r y � rte_: �r GO aaoxmr 14 15 I 16 rtewAu l.r �•_ ,_•-••_ I ® ...�...��• eercleA wAa t 5 I 1 •"' 'pgwppleAmgq'. s I O ® d:�� EASEMENTS TO BE OUITCLAAIED, m �n_�+.rti T.`..�" mSUP r nw ®aWAIE N -.. - _fwFc� d mw].eoanAm PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK NOTES D FOR � .13; r .=.a, '� }_ I I dao OUANTTTY ESTMATE PREPARED FOR msuo;av4rAx.Th ..p ® "Pe't - . rTO Awrt�.w• I (ll 'I mAx. . m.. ..t ..n.� o � :� � TREVEAR wx o:xAoarox'• nye , F . 12 ea HOLDINGS,LLC L.Ci.CD. 84161 NNL- i FlH1IU NW 1 .s AnP w•••••••'•• ®^ d 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA ST.,SIE.7500 mva®wnA1a v i, •rOe]Axn wAu - 6m1No m a 6usmw mx A ti" . uao>161n1HE1 �" �� G9BfN1 LOS ANGFIFS,CA 9001] v.Anmaa ALRV._ .] o - i I m6v®a:U °` "' ••," .o..+. w PH: (217)532-J295 FAB51f : IA' t.. �, .�� ^� • rIr dlll_ y _'I -^' FAX: (213)72]-3286 POy081 OA•Aa(Evmr WTAw WALL M .44aF�g� +)It,m ma Y P6aEla1 N1/lm� PREPARED BY: n ; _ u "" ... _ i 1FAE16r WAl1 r_.-, _ wda1 ACREAGE:- .,. _ Am•Aanal mla : ed mw®vaak a• A- - Y6 •AA ,,I eAM�oana SRE T�.w� To... SUBTi18823 a „6 ' ;i • la! 'R = a� N� °udr % TENTATIVE TRACT No. 18823 KAM., - -"� - I `1� . RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 —__ �� �Jr• 'e CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 9 ! F wAu I I I MPAraam craw 11mPm rt�vw r A e- •�-- SEE I quosn vle rH.r..w«r®.umaxoa A.r m%niiroa t�A AU _ Y�___ -I N>•x oa� MATE m im�Anox mw w� ' ,I I&�°8l CffY OF RANCID O)CANONDA OUNTY OF SAN�S14RDWO.STATE OF CALFO RAA _ Q OF= ' - ----- A"ISHH✓;EE7 4 --' SHEET 3 of 8 c\` w LOT &�- --- F]LgfM Wl1'=a —cF11fIlE 9r11F£T I AC B6N AL A� � aTONWW --T m Bln LU'T wr A - — A_;o:• iros 83 rM nrnsa m wtwis�se--wARMWI au yy j u as I n ao aP ae I u ) x •' �� F—— ro esro are A'a!l191 n - ''h v EWRM arm eA� LFMrw I f TR.•o.uses-z - I .:-ii. tz No.mw 1. FffiIW Grd dVW NCN:Ea a IHiEiFA WHl 'Y'�� NK0.8L arOY tl1.W NCR®M i0 SINN OtW NCP *S MTWO`MWY E --. 1 A' errnmn BY TTM WIT MATE NWMtE FA93B1t wTA WNL p914r1176fHp N•H1a91 MATE.'. N4V.�6 MATE 11, NWMO:N[NI NV HELI Q.- --� eYNA1BKVE �' " . .riM WAI Rg0.4➢eS R8 �.lor e - umFrAna mh: ��ew__ PIIwF IAeps� -1 -- -f - R ••-•,•,• ,�' _ 7' NC3lffiNriArE6 .x 5' = N6V�NNAIE - BfOa1EMM PP u-n.s I [NElINN110.LL Fh9B.T.. x __ - I - I NCPCAffla .B ,f A •. _ iB•Et& zS, NtNr� MMn��� rMa ewavnr - �sj F x F .�® 9uAmamaa® i y .'. 9 BJIapNry f.le-. NWNIDIa WAR \. N4R m A I __ _ r °,. _ --- I4I"4i: wacxc ENm.T air i�AS \ ;t NWE NiNLAQ L_/ Nururf mw { N GIIN aAW /. F ry B114WNE AC Og•1 _ m .v N.NfN1 - _ N3pYF FM61M.1C®al ? N:TMM]WNL B WAfN•ANIAfaJECRULMY:_. aMMN LLLOLI!ROAD61B1C1 m m.� J� Al _ ____ it E�61f ' .-. _ N �F--IA---j ARI-- P6 DEfAL_1' NCFO><D NNA1Ee� NWNf£NfNI � � - vu n. �EQE91IlRN11RLL N6lICC(i'A61p1 '. _ EffiIW IYM j.. .> LEGEND: —e— �...,....,. X- DETAIL 48' SO. FLTERRA LMT (BMP) --�- ••• "� �....,..w. =am " -:_�— PREPARED FOR TREVEAR I - HOLDINGS, A' .- 865 SOUTH FIUEROA T.,STE.35W �•��� _ I.1�A .:- e�;; KAP .... _.. e:=.__„_._.�_.. WS ANGELES,CA 900❑ • ✓ �....�w �X.. •4- ..... �:ij.:.�:'?., PH: (213)532-3295 •BB A: TYPICAL BIO-SWALE n(BdtP) BIOFLTRATION STRP (BMP) FAX: (213)327-3286 ® Ale SECTION (V-DETCH) - PREPARED Br. SUB1718823 e; ,as t TENTATIVE TRACT No. 18823 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 vl— .. '' GRADING DETAILS g Si�CTgN 'C-'C TYPICAL GRADING SETBACB DETAL CITY OF RANCHO CCAAgNDACOIMIY OFSAN BENJAFOOSTATE �OF CALFOF AA SHEET 4 of 8 • cz _ fPj SECTION •A'•'A• SECTION•B•-T3•r SECTION'C•- secTaN v-v s w '•'� .. ... e1-� 4Yy-. �� I .:. N SECTION 'E'-F - O SECTION F-F SECTION'G-' T TQ -i R SEGTgN N-N SEC710N T-T SECTION ..•m ••® p w. ..... PREPARED FOR TREVEAR m ' m HOLDINGS,LLC zr. r 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA ST.,STE.3500 LOS ANGELES.CA 90017 M PH: (213)532-3295 FAX (213)327-3286 PREPARED BY: -8'CTION SECTION '• •w d,. weABBREVIATIONS: �v SECTION 'O'-'O' ON SHEET 4 •.•.. SUBT118823 TENTATIVE TRACT No. 18823 _ GRADING RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 N 4 G SECTIONS _ _ MeJ BEf�. 4A BECTON M CRY-M er SECTION N-N OF RANCHO h' Cip CANONGq COLNOF SON BERWNO U ,STATE OF CALFIXLFOF UM •� SHEET 5 of 8 - Wloly�a P'AEIm - r Alx OY66-oehu Rloeo� + 9y -= GENERAL lFOIA1ATION 01AFlAF.�IND IdFAAIOI SAE' W3wklN W«L 16.CF.f:D .. NET I r+J � VICINITY MAP. l L .' E IYM NO 10361 MA HO 60 M t l @ I n RIM91«aN1E'!r 1 -iTp I tl _,t t 1 III .m eDEs TALI -( •'®^+' 1 CEnsaAtE' ! �o I •- — .s man'AaA'm moa®MAm n- A 6m 0Ew'wtoA� t i3 M eEAmEr Ansa RAM, xx FASBSrt.' EgFEmlyfVl .1,, lE-i./. � _, E I- nsbs r. .,.v nu.�.,.. ,ay.xe�>a I, 9• " a 11°�x'a oEAleEv lRACT 11 t � wISP�meWAix ^ rnuVem mNNtE ura _- F/.8B1f' I .9AeDApy + I 'IA=A usvdr 1 i } 1 Y �(I SH Rl F01I.S ^e.v.^..nw..e mn. -Oy 113 M'IAIE a vm^..v^wn v.v mw wr.e• LECtND: YR II f ! e4E 9Cf CQPT A F _J i CD o 2 PTPo®3S PINAm' FE-BF lrlr' I D--- s •mw.n.a m, me_...wn m,un.,• —_ WANaQ DMT _ I , L PF1EE191 WNL = sm pmmAy - .t, n! ..• ". S«NE Of00. � I �• r, I. s. w mrATa mE 3 w16a�eDmrus ,, " 'y` 18 - I NmE1tN w,vl:'- � ®�_ ® �,mw n�1•....... 0 vAtLT- -il AFOmm aim _. I _ 5 w Bff eETAI ' F.. .I� _- er.^» ®A o.m 19 �.•.^,m,.w.ra A6M t. �II ;' ,�.•: .. F ��_ o ^� .gym �,.,..., — . 4 r 'L' 1 •�1 '{�Omlwn iAT&mFw+ ®m DNE A ...1...'. --- - -i ,�. , III• 1¢MAX " . r� - 1 Vii• �w�iAre-. ... ^®�� � �":...`..=-,e.. " M1M1 E"re I LAPD USE SLUMARY: m 14 ••••• •'•••"L""..., wAu 5 t; 15 Y x. 16 I I w4iel w«r, n ..mi urAlacm.... ra.0 nssLguzl m... '6owmFeslaD I' !.. :1 II, a .. I .. - Wuosna4•. ..,� .n m •w'.:....""".. .�,... IRNA1E f ? I wseda: RESOENML LOT SUMMARY: OWNER / PREPARED FOILN.n m^,_ •..^ 1, M .Lww1 a M,1 ssorvoet TREVEAR HOLDINGS,LLC MAX, I3 _,a elves® I m«awsro 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA ST.,STE.3500 PROS N •1 o HNAIE 1' oaAWAo;EAaavrt y '�. ••• F '. ,.-y das ara6u vex 1111 IIf'6TON.mw,,. n r w APPLICANT: LOS ANGELES,CA 90017 .'AIX 03MC61-Or' n: woo6EDe 4 M v uSDE«T A I II'ICIW.'q. 66Ga:^_.- TENTATIVE TRACT NM 18823 �:��� PH: (213)532-3295 12 �� 11 FAX: (213)3273286 sseeeo leeElel w«E ' 1_. _ `. s v tamR aFmuuc nTM Y„ •x�Aewn wAu _ 7 .aohwaasan • I III \ DATA "p PREPARED BV: _ feealert.V rLme R.,e m snrA6a�RIDa IErDias veru~ BAR �IIVa�aI' CRY - -11.. 6H LETAl4 p. �` ,�� + VARIANCES. DEVIA710NS:. eNETr ...,. .. _ RIM= wlmmm es Ra 4 ism wAu : _ bmnD wA19ILAM Tom.. •• Amcanra roE eawcaFmrNp � 3'7 .. +'y aim � '' � OO, r' wooer V RN .!Y F `A � 3lMTdH 6EtN I0iA1[M IDE. 9' 111 ®® ' � mcm C/W I- 8. 9 .! 10 II 1; f,lCL"f�a-AODlQlII ® .... + " IAiE 0) °"�"°""` SUBTT18823 AM TENTATIVE TRACT No. 18823 .I RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 SAM. �'II TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 4 epoPosm e - I N Whew W1oro®iw to WNAm mwwa, aAemcr ApF.99 wNAIE P.ilOSEe wAu, n.Aea:wearve A.Px oaarnhoa rr wAert-_: m rn nn .-wwlx uwavE :opuulE .I uWlm _ CRY OF RANCHO CI CAMCNGA COI.NR OF SAN Rc-WJUNO,STATE OF CALFC`FKA - �TM ma l SHEET6 of rua vera :."'�. I WL9W AVFHE ElBfMJ GiIN K"M N6p5®SIQY OIMI �q�, 8H N.4 JW omen t m rn m21 eRvn ar TRY" FUTM eAx —1— _ EnJLOT A Alx Sees —-------------------------------- _-- - ---- — i -- 'm -- ----- ' _-_ ,_-- MWlo-fie.ee sm_. � -'1- 0 IF ==_ n o Jv Je Am --I �Emiln wx I,RR 1 if F-_ to oaten dmeurtial n + S 21 YR. FY6Rn GLOI SAW EY GRN �' W. O6es-2 I I '•. -- :I IR No.Lim X- 9 0Y dux wo o m A)"'8704W OVII errnHfn Prn841 NStl RTE LEGAL DESCRPTION LEGEND. MATEes MNAIE INHef£EVgEllf e®.vm.mw .w mv"eew.eu m+.orae.ewe PATS flg WFRYVATE s o�p®•.� an BgYI�{MAiF WNI8MY2 _I (� ® ee.+.+� OIUIV£leew a dov xEi. 10 WCNU£a to e . AM HIM, .I" -��-- - - - -- - — - 1- - �' ,ale' s F91LM 81A1 - _ v.Yc:e .�mue.umi m+m .�� iSnLT lnaoNR •� ,s �«...........� BASIS OF BEARINGS ......n..-... ®,w..m ___ _ _—__ __— _1 /.,., _ PRIVATE DRIVE *A' __ GATED ENTRY/EXIT DETAIL ASSESSOR'S +'�^,•p•9.:—i m.. 'n O neoNem ,. PARCEL NUMBERS: D w..•'.+m...:. M I4 e6e1 HYNYID RHF GRN 9A41. I �® ' mew..i Sort-,.v:e s mr..�r ITL FROM X R - lg UTILITY PURVEYORS FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION wAHYdAN BuiOCK nAo 9'Iauolr 1 /e 14 I.I, e r,mm •."e``�•••,e,.e.�.+u.naw. „ .n .,,., '.sn."w ________________ __ 1 _ INV --�EIdIW oJ8 a OR191 ` �iwAIFJ •� •v s,n m� _ f _PRIVATE DUNE 'B' , m w DETAIL 'D' GATED ENTRY/IXR DETAIL. I I' BBS I PREPARED FOR m n H _ 41 TREVEAR It HOLDINGS,LLC ( J 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA ST.,STE.3500 r N LOS AGA1] IBi� PH: (213)532-532. 900 3295 FAX: (213)32]-3286 J'4 a .+. •• 17, FAX: F PREPARED BY: m .... r. WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE DRIVE B' ENTRY/EXIT RESIDENTIAL —�-• ......, _r... 'w� LOT AREAS ZVI IT I` dv � ,�e .,....� Qlrv• TENTATIVE TRACT Nou18823 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 PRIVATE DRIVE 'v®EMRV/EXIT PRIVATE DRIVE 'A' & TENTATIVE TRACT MAP a ��y������� �M1rtl.YERID¢ ® P.nwf INIIlAC rsEO CALIF 4m¢ CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(1A CIXNR OF SAN BEIUlAR71N0,STATE OF CALFdNR """` SHEET 7 of 8 STAFF REPORT _ I'LANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: September 14, 2011 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2011-00724 -JONATHAN C. CURTIS -A request to review Tentative Tract Map 18823 for consistency with the North Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site is a 13.52-acre remnant parcel of a larger 15.03-acre parcel which was previously divided into 5 parcels under Recorded Parcel Map 15550, located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road at Blue Sky Court-APN: 0226-081-15 through 17. - PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant County Conservation Land; Very Low Residential, Etiwanda North Specific Plan South Vacant County Conservation Land; Very Low Residential, Etiwanda North Speck Plan East - Single-Family Residential; Very Low Residential, Etiwanda North Specific Plan • West - Vacant County Conservation Land; Very Low Residential, Etiwanda North Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The site is a puzzle-shaped parcel that is part of an overall project that is rectangular shaped. The project area is 13.52 acres located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Blue Sky Court. The site currently has three partially built homes on 3 of the parcels. Two other homes were built on Blue Sky Court and those parcels are not a part of this proposal. Currently, Centex Homes is processing Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 (south of this site) that will subdivide two parcels into 53 lots by Centex Homes. The project site is bordered on the north and west by San Bernardino County Flood Control District owned properties that have been set aside as resource conservation areas. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The original subdivision of lots, which included Parcels 0226-081-14 through 16, was approved by the County of San Bernardino prior to incorporating this portion of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2003. Parcel Map 15550 was later recorded in 2003, and this parcel map subdivided Parcel 0226-081-14, a 4.76-acre lot, into 3 parcels. These parcels • EXHIBIT D D, E,F- 23 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2011-00724—JONATHAN C. CURTIS • September 14, 2011 Page 2 are currently 0226-081-17 through 19. Parcels 0226-081-15 and 16 are also 4.76-acre lots and are currently not a part of this proposal. Both parcels have partially built homes that were permitted by the County, but never finaled. The City of Rancho Cucamonga issued permits to the owner of record in June of 2006. The permits were issued for four of the five single-family residences being constructed at that time. The residence on Parcel 0226-081-18 was permitted and finaled by the County. B. General: The workshop applicant requests that the Planning Commission review the possibility of subdividing Parcels 0226-081-15 through 17 into 20 residential lots. The site falls within the Etiwanda North Speck Plan (ENSP). The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance of this Specific Plan, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Each area in the ENSP falls within a themed neighborhood. These parcels are located within the Etiwanda Highland Neighborhood. Within this area the applicant is required to provide local trails that provide access to the community trail system along Etiwanda Creek wash and the upper utility corridor. Along Wardman Bullock Road, the neighborhood theme wall is a stucco design with a concrete cap and brick veneer pilasters every 40 to 60 feet and shall be featured to keep this site consistent with the site boundaries that are adjacent. The zoning designation for this area is Very Low Residential of the ENSP. The designation requires that each lot a have minimum net average of 25,000 square feet and a minimum of • 20,000 square feet. The smallest lot is 20,080 square feet and the average lot size of all the lots is 25,069 square feet. Both of these meet the minimum requirements. The minimum requirement for lot depth is 150 feet, and all lots except for Lot 10 meet this requirement. Lot 10 would require a Variance to meet this requirement or the tract map would need to be revised. The proposed minimum lot width of 90 feet at the required front setback of 42 feet has also been met. Lots 1, 13, and 16 all are proposed with the partially built homes on them, and they meet the respective side yard setbacks of 10 feet and 20 feet. The front yard setback of 42 feet average +/- 5 feet is being met on the three homes. The density range for the Very Low Residential district is 0-2 dwelling units per acre, and this development is at 1.55 dwelling units per acre. The structures on Lots 13 and 16 exceed the maximum lot coverage average of 25 percent. These lots would require a Variance for lot coverage. The site is required to provide a 15-foot wide local trail to connect to the community trail system. The applicant is requesting that Lots 1 and 12 through 17 be classed as non-equestrian lots as they do not contain areas that will allow the construction of a corral area. Lots 1, 13, and 16 are either over the allowable lot coverage or close to exceeding the lot coverage, thus not allowing the construction of corrals for the protection of the horses. Lots 10 and 11 have a trail that is located in the front of the residences, which is discouraged. The applicant has been requested to contact the property owner of the Tentative Tract Map 18741 to gain access to their trail system for connectivity purposes. D, E, F- 24 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW ORC2011-00724—JONATHAN C. CURTIS September 14, 2011 Page 3 Lots 18 through 20 are through lots that are proposed to front onto a 600-foot cul-de- sac that Is 50 feet wide. The Etiwanda Specific Plan does not allow a 50-foot wide street; only a 60-foot wide street is permitted. Increasing the size of both proposed streets would reduce the average lot size and may require the applicant to reduce the number of lots to increase the minimum lot size average. Both the Engineering and Fire Departments have concerns about the length of the cul-de-sac for Street A, as it exceeds the maximum length. The Fire and Engineering Departments would prefer to see it loop onto Blue Sky Court to create two points of access for those homes. A Grading Plan was not included with this submittal; therefore, grading comments were not included in this report. The Engineering and Fire Department's comments have been attached to this report for review(Exhibits D and E). CONCLUSION In conclusion, the layout has many issues and challenges which need to be addressed before this project can move forward, by either reconfiguring the layout to adhere to the Code or applying for Variances where it may not be possible to redesign do to constraints already existing on the site, including the buildings under construction. There are many options that can be examined and utilized to achieve compliance with the governing documents of this area. Respectfully submitted, R- &,VYN Jame R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Letter from Applicant Exhibit B - Preliminary Site Plan and Arial Overlay Exhibit C - Preliminary Building/ Corral Setback Exhibit Exhibit D - Engineering Department Comments Exhibit E - Fire Safety Comments • D,E, F- 25 • k A N NF R5 I { N GIN IF v3 I SURV EV a I S Project Description ... TTM 18823 TTM 18823 is the relatively undeveloped 13.52-acre remnant parcel of a larger 15.03-acre parcel. Parcel Map No. 15550 (Pm 15550) created two numbered lots totaling 1.51 acres and a remainder parcel of 3.50 acres (APN 0226-081-17). There are two additional parcels within TTM 18823, APN 0226-081-15 and 16, S.00 acres and 5.02 acres, respectively. PM 15550 also created Blue Sky Court, a private street, which is contained entirely withln PM 15550. Five houses were constructed by the former developer on each of the lots within PM 15550 and in each of the three adjacent assessor's parcels. Only one house, on lot I of PM 15550, was sold; the other four houses are 16 various stages of completion, ranging from approximately eighty percent to ninety-plus percent. TTM 18823 proposes to accomplish several items: • To create lots that will accommodate the three existing houses on the three assessor's parcels; • • To create lots that will meet the criteria in the North Etiwanda Specific Plan (North Etlwanda Specific Plan) development standards: • To create as many lots as possible that will have adequate depths (190'# minimum, 200'± average) to accommodate equestrian corrals; • To provide multipurpose trails to all equestrian lots; • To meet the average lot size of 25,000 square feet per the A zoning in the North Etiwanda Specific Plan; To provide fire protection for all of the lots; To complete the improvements on Wardman Bullock Road as an early priority when construction begins. TTM 18823 provides seven non-equestrian lots, three of which contain partially-completed houses. Two of the partially-constructed homes constrain the four adjacent lot depths to the 160'± depth. The other thirteen lots have adequate depth (190'±) to provide proper clearances between corral areas and habitable structures. 10EXHIBIT A ... V01cf: 949-23:41121 FAX: 90.751.0510 C:\514W0\gen\Pr0jeCt Destription.doe PC q/ /q/11 D, E,F- 26 • PLAN N F 2 5 I IN 61 NE13 1 5V RVL SORS JOHIr NroNL:n. 1.Wnr,to Q.iei:?.-'�. . and Cor... The lots range in size from 20,080 square feet (Lot 12) to 40,924 square feet (Lot 2), averaging 25,069 square feet. The non-equestrian lots will have minimum lot depths of 160 feet while the equestrian lots will have a minimum lot depth of 190 feet, with most of them having or exceeding the 200-foot depth. TTM 18823 will coordinate boundary line conditions with TTM 18741 (Centex) to the south for such things as trail and wall locations, drainage facilities, and grading. The receiver for the property, Jonathan C. Curtis, is working on completing the site - improvements for Blue Sky Court and Wardman Bullock Road fronting PM 15550, as well as finishing the house on Parcel 2 of PM 15550. • StOnlny C.Mena Ffl]O R.dhillA'04.0VOICF: O49•]51.41]1 $.R.550 FAR; 919•251.0514 G\814\OO19rn\PrOjeC1 oe cripuon.doc S.R."Skip"Schuln k,I..,CA 92611 r.ww.wduonnNi.pnwl D,E, F- 27 I A.P.N. 0226-001-13 SA.C.F.C. D. I I , I I L- 8' MOH FIRE WALL P.P4T. NO. 15550 I �, o N 6 89'31'47 E 375. j l P"-sa • is , . .;1.14 .::,. 129• '^r 177 5 I'^ .6^DRAWCF: . .sil• S. .FASEYEIET S4 t_..I I'^ I 4 IWi 2 .70'II� :II 40 } 2 E+ItpP05LD S 693 :HAP Sl O IAirvEWAx, �T I �. 1 ✓_._: I Ih 1 _ p ImN 1 to 26.y27.SFn I.'fl' VlCr iMP LD _ ......y__ z 'ALL i5' IRA14E15DENT: il' ✓4' •' 'Y4`Ati': <•. 4. ASSESSOR'$ C Lp �e,owm AcC EASESQ YI t_^: mrwx f,t PARCEL Nuli6ER3: \�� NM 022e-unl-I51f000p117 •,�I h ZCM1� ;`2n• SE16+B(:}I f r, , E }R=M,O , �I-._ / A .r.-.' CuREW zam! n +RC , 2 �M' ,+•'1P+:lxli '{`,-A �jl: JPJMICAbD ' .. n < D(1[p%[. �r_-��%!.. , 6141[10 \3 .I 77 ' 5 o-zts66'as'S PLAN: NORTH ERWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN DwR4ACC EAE]F.Mf•. i.' + I ti19356' JI jr^�� m`ll. iLI' LOT 8114MARY:a=I.I i '. 491.LD1 SIX PER 70rAC. 70.000 SI .. 202, . .H .`:)( 24,3Lb'SR X6a,9,08 5�-•I : - -1. ,,.• PROPOSED WN. 101 SIZE: 20MO S N1" n .'+ Cu. ,8I 1 44L AVERAGE 101 SIZE 4'(11 [OVOID: -� Sv 4'B'..%.:z•-sfp,.,. •,�dG a�•G6I; ,�-- 2. ro t .fASfMEl1f y i•�'� ;4.'>� \,. ,nl i.0 u1 _ �I f x000 SE f ' UN LOAD AVREPHI PER LOT NC: 25.069 S .-__ r,;;x,• � !r ux, Lo1 o[vm P[P zaRNc: I['�+ 23.4291 SP7 .-..�w `L .• w �,}� ISP(LOTS II& 15) PROPOSED WN. LOT DEPTH: 16PLOIS I, 17. 13, 16& 17 /' .%' X, -, )p•?:-: PROPOSED YIH LOT DEPTH: ) L I b 75"1RA4,[I$[AIENi %$ tt, d,- •r4 ,4. 1)'., ,. 190(LOIS 1-11 & 16-ZO) ux.LOT WDTH PER 20MNG: 90 z 61.1 v7>a�x'„ 1 ? + u PROPOSED 4A LDI 41DIH Pty \ :27883 SF "' I•. •. # 1 GROSS 10R(A 15.52 AC. rp`g, .#� f A`' OiI'.W''�N2-07I0E'::FASOr2N:7_C..,,.•tiy°..:,�,.•Vi,`tia+r1...,.:,:. a,♦... r E E a\ , .j`U1rk'l:,'l,)'.,.:1'•.. A S A G. MAR IT LOTS, 20 ClorRANGE PCR ZONING: 0-Z W/AC. GROSS 0D9D: 1.4a DU/AC, to® Yn grp155 DuJAC. SMACK fi • r io 1a0'U !BOYAR 55'A 11'> OIARO 10r/70', mlrr¢x: 20' O® 6• DRAINAGE'fA.SEL1EYf Ilph 50' �N i2' 6/W .�. FROMJ - • 5A 'HPI, Fw ci6 30, 70 EASE" 25.256..5F „ ,' ) ..7...�4:/)0; ,+ A1r 3 t al•40 I tliT m MGHEST RCSWENML 8 DRMLGE% AEA500l/ ; '-•'+ fJ't t �il 20_ LOA NUMBERfs' 7R71L.F/SEIENT' S' SnaAc4(� , ''p Awn 11ouM4Rr Ib- v ! . PLRINETER WNL •z B91 5G:'•;.��, '-" '� - 3� it l� ;;:_;: uLmcaPlm Ilam °) , 28.3$) SF 2Pp' .. . .`�.'..` '<Ika ' CWESIRIM LOTS 1 N 89'29'34' E •613.39' '-'� !:':}i � ill-!'', � NP!-IWCSIMAN LOIS LOTS 9-11 70 BE COORDIIAIED W/TIM 18741 PROP050 IM I .;I WAR, [AS[UENI AREA A.P.N. 0226-081-05 TTM 10741 CENTEX HOMES DRAD44 E CASEIIENI AREA M l N IAXDSCAPE AREA LOT USE SUMMARY: PREPARED FOR LOTS LAND USE ACREAGE PERCENT(%) TREVEAR N r OIS wO SUT4N IAWIY m191NN149 11.51 c)sz HOLDINGS,LLC •A•axovaxam1O� PUBLIC STREETS'A7 I.10 10.21% M5 Bl/l7THfRUVFRGA ST.,5'15.JSpI 811g7 -m WN r"IAeIKK I= O6! 4.56% L.OSANGEM.CA 9W17 PH;(21059;-9295 GROSS ACREAGE 13.52 AC. 100.00% PAX:(III)9T7.528A ..:P" (10 C. s7BECI) PREPAREDAY: L,CCRpI a•a- ' � TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18823 20 RESIDENTIAL LOTS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN • —q_ m ,A— �+c' CP OF RANCHO G1CUCWA,=WfT OF SAN MWfM,STATE OF CAlYCW -•« Y•� ,.®v„J IMM FUMED, MY120D EXHIBIT B -1 A"'�� �MM DATE PREPAI4E9D E4A�2$701111 PC- I{//y/it D, E,F- 28 R C4 N 4 3 aE = .s rl g 0-0i Fn x1b Ir Q- 3, px0Z Op— U _� Cw • Rii� r ��--� 7� 7 "is � 717 IIIIIaEI fl J _1 ;✓ IE .. � 5 ,6 1d iis4Ilo���� � '71 Wa Nft • 5 � I� `Iuu��I�IMHtltltlMtltl d! O U � __ -._.r —...-.. _ -.---•._ WOtl14D'1'�O NVIpJYM • IY' (-'""""--•...� is (AN IP oo :r tom: ,. •..�� � \ � `- I � I4 I P 1 R I c L_.__� �' ( •L�- 6\\Ir ����\rI� 1�Y�`(' 1 ' ' l� ` f'( ). �� aa+ �y �,2 tine F \. i 41 \1• \ '� � +`} � '+�.y,, I` �lytd r • L- J. ' L_ _.J LJ L_'t Ju- �_ -- --- I 1 io-wo-vao xry I ioaoo•vrzo xry I • c 1 EXHIBIT C D,E, F- 29 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No.: DRC2011.00724 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW Type: 20 SFR Tentative Tract Location:WS/O Wardman Bullock N/O Wilson Avenue Planning Division: Steven Fowler APN_226-081-14. 15& 17 P & E Meeting: 7-19-11 By: Willie Valbuena 8/3/11 Ckd: 0>111 // Planning Commission Workshop: COMMENTS: 1. Developer proposes 50-foot rights-of-way with 2-foot sidewalk easements on both sides. The Etiwanda North Specific Plan does not provide for reduced rights-of-way for rural streets like the Etiwanda Specific Plan does. Tracts on the east side of Wardman Bullock, which annexed into the City with a development agreement in the late 1980s, have reduced rights-of-way. However development to the north and proposed development to the south does not. a. In addition, they are only showing a 9-foot parkway with 4.5 feet between the back of curb and sidewalk. City standard is a 12-foot parkway with a 7-foot planting area. This reduced area will restrict the size and type of street trees that can be used. 2. One of the cul-de-sacs exceeds 600 feet in length without a second point of access. The • developer is proposing a 20-foot private trail and emergency access easement to Blue Sky Court, an existing private street. Developer shall obtain written approval for this approach from the owners of occupied Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 15550 prior to Planning Commission approval of the tentative map, If he is unable to do so, the street layout will need to be reconfigured to the satisfaction of the Fire District. a. We understand the possibility of a loop with the private street is also being discussed, 3. Adjacent property to the south, at northwest comer of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue (Tentative Tract 18741) is also being reviewed by staff. This could present an opportunity to obtain access from the south, if doing so would lead to a more optimal lot configuration per the zoning requirements and reduce the variance request. However, SUBTT18741 has been in the process for some time so such a request would need to be clearly justified. a. There may also be an opportunity to coordinate the design of the private equestrian trail on Lots 9-11, along the south tract boundary, with SUBTT18741. 4. Wardman Bullock Road is a Collector Street, so no driveways will be allowed. 5. Tract 16324, at the north end of Wardman Bullock Road has been conditioned to complete the westerly portion of Wardman Bullock all the way to Wilson Avenue. If the Wardman Bullock frontage is constructed by others, this developer will be required to pay his fair share of the reimbursement agreement. 6. Provide a preliminary drainage report that addresses the sizing of facilities along the west tract boundary needed to have the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone "D' • designation removed from the project area. EXHIBIT ?/,, 1 of 1 PC, 114 D, E, F- 30 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District RMW Fire Construction Services PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS July 28, 2011 Coyote Moon, LLC SFR Subdivision, VHFHSZ Tentative Tract 18823 DRC2011-00724 Fire Construction Services (FCS) has reviewed your plans for a residential subdivision on the west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. Following are the observations that have been made based on current state and local Fire codes. 1. This project is located in the VHFHSZ; please have a Fire Protection Plan prepared to access and mitigate the fire risk to this development, Please note that off site vegetation management does not appear feasible (except on the south side). This plan must be reviewed and approved before Fire Construction Services deem the subdivision's • tentative Map complete. 2. The configuration of the street layout is not conforming to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; the cul-de-sac exceeds the maximum permitted length of 600'. In your redesign, it is recommended that street A extends to Blue Sky Court as a thru street and the owners of the properties on Blue Sky Court are approached to dedicate Blue Sky Court and convert to a public street. 3. Call Janet Walker at (909) 477-2770 ext. 3003 to confirm that the parcels are annexed into Fire District's Community Facilities District 88-1. If the parcels are not annexed, the process must be started. 4. Provide a fire flow letter to proof the required fire flow of 1500 GPM @ 20psi. 5. Clearly indicate on the plans that the buildings will be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. If you have any questions please contact Moises Eskenazi, Senior Fire Plans Examiner at (909) 477-2710 Extension 4209 or at moisqs.eskenazi@cirXofrc,us EXHIBIT E r3c nl �f ��fl Pagclofl D,E,F- 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting September 14, 2011 Chairman Munoz called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 8:55 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher,Frances Howdyshell,Lou Munoz,Francisco Oaxaca; Ray Wimberly ABSENT: Francisco Oaxaca STAFF PRESENT: Steven Flower,Assistant CityAttomey;Steve Fowler,Assistant Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; James Troyer, Planning Director ANNOUNCEMENTS None NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2011-00724-JONATHAN C.CURTIS-Arequesttoreview Tentative Tract Map 18823 for consistency with the North Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site is a 13.52 acre remnant parcel of a larger 15.03 acre parcel which was previously divided into 5 parcels under Recorded Parcel Map 15550, located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road at Blue Sky Court-APN: 0226-081-15 though 17. John Curtis of Trevear Holdings LLC introduced his team including Brenda Vargas and Stan Morse of MDS Consulting. Mr.Curtis stated that he was appointed the receiver by the court for the property. He said they have been working with Planning, Building and Safety and Engineering towards a workable solution. He gave an overview of the prior development noting that work started about 10 years ago resulting in one house on Blue Sky and the property owner has 4 lots. He said the original plans for the homes came through the County and permits were issued by the City many years ago. He said there are different owners and his objective is to clean up a mess, do some site planning to try to move forward. He said they have attempted to consider the size of the lots, home and street placement, horsetrails etc. Commissioner Fletcher asked if all 4 properties are owned by the bank. Mr. Curtis said there are 4 legal owners but it is really owned by the same people. He sold as • receiver,the bank takes over the entire property and he has full jurisdiction over the property. He D, E, F- 32 said the bank wants us (Mr. Curtis and team)to fix it, as they really don't want to foreclose on the property. He said they would not build out the rest of the lots although they are trying to finish the • two lots that were left partially built, and then the other lots would probably be sold off later. Commissioner Fletcher asked if there are legal difficulties considering there are four different owners. Mr. Curtis explained that there is one court order for the entire property and only one signature is needed (his) so that it is not so tricky in that regard. Chairman Munoz asked if there are any plans for the short term. Mr. Curtis said the plan is to finish off and sell off the property. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she recalls that the one existing house appears to be the same or very similar to the other two partially built homes. Mr. Curtis said they are basically the same. Vice Chairman Howdyshell confirmed that the intent Is to complete them and then with the completion of the tract they would have 5 homes completed. Chairman Munoz asked what they anticipate as issues with 4 applicants. Mr. Curtis said they already identified a need for several variances and minor modifications. Stan Morse, MDS Consulting said an issue is how to work with the existing houses and streets. He said for Lot 10 they have to define the depth and for Lot 11 they would have to have frontage along Street B but the front yard setback would be from Wardman Bullock. He said the mid-lots do not ft • the rules for equestrian because they cannot fit the corrals in there. He said those lots maybe able to access a trail they believe will be installed by Centex and if that plan fails,they do have a fallback position. He noted the issues to follow: • Some interior lots (tan colored on the plans) are not equestrian-Lot 1 is not large enough. He said they have some lots with minor exceptions. • With respect to 50 -foot street widths— He suggested they give the City the streets they want but they would be 36 feet curb to curb with a parkway, and an easement inside the property lines. He said it would look like a 60-foot wide street but it would be contained within a 50-foot width with a 4 -foot sidewalk easement on each side of the street. • If they are unable to gain right of way via quitclaim for the knuckle property, then emergency access to the other culdesac will be provided. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she is encouraged to see the vision as the property is currently a real eyesore. Commissioner Munoz said it looks like a fairly good plan to correct a not-so-easy problem. Mr. Morse said that because of the street placements, it made 4 nearly impossible. He said they need a Variance on Lot 10 for lot depth; and a Minor Exception for Lot 2 for lot coverage and then they need a by off from the Fire Department for two points of access with respect to the knuckle property. He noted that the property owner on Lot 1 of Parcel Map 15550 is somewhat content with his solitude and has not really indicated what he wants or would accept. PC Adjourned Minutes -2- September 14, 2011 • D, E,F- 33 Mr. Fowler said the Fire Department is looking for two means of access. He said with respect to the • 50 foot widths-if they are required to go to 60 feet, then the lots will be below the required 25,000 square foot average lot size-and that would result in another Variance or loss of parcels. He said on Lots 18, 19 and 20 they could take 10 feet off and still meet the required lot depths. Mr. Morse said Street B would be an issue and typically they would not want a trail in front of the lots, but they should talk with Centex and see if they will allow those lots to use their trail access. Mr. Troyer noted that the Commission only needs to direct staff to investigate the issues and to see what works. Mr. Fowler asked Mr. Curtis if they have considered leveling the two partially complete houses. Mr. Curtis said so much money has been put into them. He said there is value associated with those and it is also helping them to get it cleaned up faster. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer said those two homes can not receive occupancy until those streets are developed. Mr. Morse noted they are currently cleaning up trash piles, mountains of block and winterizing the site. Commissioner Fletcher said to get as much compliance they can find with the Specific Plan. He said he is not opposed to the Variance idea, but he would want to see access to the trail. He suggested they adjust the lot lines to make it work with the Speck Plan without all these changes and Variances and bring the street through with the knuckle property (see Lots 1 and 20). Vice Chairman Howdyshell noted the interior lots are too small for equestrian and not having them • adds a nice mix. Commissioner Fletcher said that with that in mind, he is not opposed to a Variance to forget about those lots being equestrian lots. Mr. Fowler said the properties along the Centex (south) property line will be equestrian with that access. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she agrees with the other commissioners, that perhaps once the owner of the knuckle property sees the benefit he will gain by punching through the knuckle, he will cooperate to allow the street to come through. Commissioner Wimberly noted that the proposed plan is mapped for 20 lots. He asked if they could consider fewer units. Mr.Morse said they are constricted with trying to map around the partially built homes. He said they have done other studies with more lots but they want the lots to be legitimate lots with trails. He said they are not driven by the number of lots. Commissioner Wimberly noted that they need to justify all those Variances. Mr. Curtis noted that they have very unique circumstances and they are trying to minimize the number of Variances. Mr. Troyer said no commitments are being made here but if we can make findings to support the Variances then they will be brought to the Commission for consideration. • PC Adjourned Minutes -3• September 14, 2011 D, E,F- 34 Chairman Munoz suggested Mr. Curtis work with staff to see what they can work out and to minimize Variances where possible. He said tonighfs workshop is a pre-application and they have work to • do; no guarantees. Mr. Morse said they will start negotiating in earnest with the one property owner with respect to punching through the knuckle to gain a proper connection between Blue Sky Court and Street A. Commissioner Fletcher said that if they have to wipe out the partially built houses,he did not have a problem with that and he would prefer they meet all the requirements of the Specific Plan. Mr. Curtis said they want proper planning in the end. . . . . . PUBLIC COMMENTS None f f f } R COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:40 p.m. • Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AIC Secretary Approved: September 28, 2011 PC Adjourned Minutes -4- September 14, 2011 • D,E,F- 35 MOOFICATIO Zd B.B:C.F.CD FIJ 1 4 •- ,_- _-_ ! PROPOSED API. TPM NO. 1 PM NCS..•.,60 19J67 .:• p I 2 'a PROPOSED-,,. PROPOSED E T13AL, 7. a 0.6iC)ENCi - I,h 1 1 13 i i I 1 &B.EJi6BJ(iY ACCE93 LIRE 111 1 IR NO. ACCESS 666-4 RCFPO TWTT)iN AC_-C.OF36ANCE I1 t r 14 ��- , f 6.., -BLUE SKY COIAT FWATE) = I _._ t 'i t - LEGEND- �__ D® I 2 EX.FHz�a@ 1= ILLIi rn < f ' '�S ?a S ! _ i_ �r -tiw. 7 •7JC p w =T...0 E ... AI- 17 I I6 ®5AC � c FH 1 1 S LOT 'A• ��. (PUBLIC) 1 FF J DRNE A' rr i 4 p _` tF iIE fFI s LOA I I i ow s> 42" y- I ....��..� 1 A') • i� .c�®®u.;� WaafWl t ? 5 14. 15 dr 16 t d 1 ; Al FH• t F i Ex FH4b oam gym.R PROPOSED W PUa MODFTCATION ZONE - - �I � * - 6 z�; PREP ARED FO - t , TREVEAR APH 0226-08197 I F. = t _ s 1.cP.cD. if if 12 i t 3+'41L1101J6bG3-- K HOLDINGS,LLC 865 SOUTH FIGUEROA ST.,STE.3500 EPn°r°sm TAAL PHS( 3)53ANGELES, 3295 90017 ? ..' ACCEy j :..,d : 1z�y.;pRW I •1 d'II .. 11 26 r` FAX: (213)327-3286 GRAD SGLE Ek4ERGENC i FH r x' + hYI d MIji PREPARED BY: 1 ° PROPOSED 1 E EccESTRMTRAL 10 m 4 r r ' ": rRorosED is ,...., •SUBTT18823 FUEL TION low TENTATIVE TRACT No. 18823 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-19 _- --- R 1 �.: i t 7 TRA 6 t ji 11 d ie . .AM A 2DM Io 1 W RAL_ I; aceEss v 7TM T yF I 1 I D..ft pw a"um a oe ".N.".N.0226-I ., I MODFIC ON zONE 18741 `` I d 1 I F.: y 9 D I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC,A,COUNTY OF SAN BEMARDM0,STATE OF CALIFORMA tTM 18741- - F"__ --- _:µPN:-0226.08195 M 18741 - •=cw .I : ilf: l' ..-,....- SHEET 8 of B 1 � I�'I� f �x1 ;,` .. :.i SANtIS EGWIDO v� r r� r4p_CC��. 2 / 3 0 f 1 } I DORA`— l� u o. .. _ i m .. 1 ! ' • Z : .GRA' �o \ �" i `m : .:'i: : r:: Z - q�Obi— r .. I : , o wcox SS . .. NOBSONG f \ gr s G. .. �;.'..,..: '` : :: .���lI4 .. .. .. N EXHIBIT F fc, � / i I I '3 D,E,F- 37 Print Form ENVIRONMENTAL Li.4'a Y' INFORMATION FORM • i & G (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, Mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. • GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: SUBTT 18823 Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 18823 Name&Address of project owner(s): Coyote Moon, L.P.; Grandir Group, L.P.;Wildwaters, L.P. c/o Jonathan C. Curtis, as Receiver 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Name &Address of developer or project sponsor Jonathan C. Curtis, as Receiver (Same as above) Contact Person&Address: Brenda Vargas I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt.doc Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT G 'Igl,3D, E,F- 38 (Same as above) Name &Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Stan Morse, MDS Consulting • 17320 Redhill Avenue, Suite 350, Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone Number. 9491251-8821 PROJECT • ' • 1 • Information indicated by an asterisk(`)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1; Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2, Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): South of Blue Sky Court and west of Wardman Bullock Road 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0226-081-15, 16, 17 • 'S) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. fl.).: 12.93 acres `6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 12.36 acres dedications).' 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None 8 Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Panl.doc Page 2 of 10 D, E, F- 39 agencies in order to fully implement the project: • 9 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): The site is a partially disturbed site with two existing partially constructed houses. The site slopes from the northwest to the southeast at a 6-7% gradient. Besides the two existing houses, there are no other structures. There are no significant features based upon the geological, hydrologic, biotic, archaeological, and traffic studies. • 10 Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): None per project cultural report. • I:IPLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 3 of 10 D, E,F- 40 11 Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Traffic on Wardman Bullock Road is the only noise source which will be mitigated by a six-foot-high block wall • along Wardman Bullock Road. 12 Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: See attached Project Description. • 13 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial, etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North- San Bernardino County Flood Control District Preserve West-San Bernardino County Flood Control District Preserve South -Vacant but being processed for an SFD project East- Existing SFD homes 14 Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No. • (:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 4 of 10 D,E,F- 41 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • Short-term noise will be generated during construction of the project. Long-term noise will be generated from project traffic. '16, Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None. 17, Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None. 18. Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please • contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 13,395 Peak use(gal/Day) 26,790 b. Commerciall7nd. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. 21 Septic Tank ❑ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) b. CommerciaUlndustrial(gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20, Number of residential units: 19 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum lot size:21,144 Maximum lot size: 41,913 Average lot size: 25,722 Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): For sale. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Parll.doc Page 5 of 10 D, E, F- 42 21, Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents, Sale Price(s) $N/A to $N/A • Rent(per month) $ to $ 22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Not available. 23, Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Not available. 24, Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary. ,. b. Junior High: / t 2_54 C. Senior High 3.80 • COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25, Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26, Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27, Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total. Maximum Shift., Time of Maximum Shift., • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Parti.doc Page 6 of 10 D,E, F- 43 29, Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): • 30, Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City. `31 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should bf verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32, Have the water,sewer,fire,and Flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to providt adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. • Yes-all agencies have been contacted and all can provide services. 33. In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials' Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances,pesticides an( herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i known. None. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 7 of 10 D, E, F- 44 34. Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used ant proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown ant labeled on the application plans. • No. 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional inforInation maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 2' ZU�Z Signature: 4V Title: Project Engineer • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 8 of 10 D, E, F- 45 ATTACHMENT "A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day • Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 9 of 10 D,E, F- 46 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School • 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • (:%PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 10 of 10 D,E, F- 47 3M i " 1-11 ..-- .. - , — Ir ' z7� KY {ice A- .3 21 22 22 'z 2 '17 TTMA 8823 ;J1 ------ . 04 I 27 S. 2' 28 x'- tit'. ":./..... SOURCE: USGS Quad. Cucamonga Peak, CA, Devore, CA Mf IN �7 PREPARED FOR: TREVEAR HOLDINGS LLC USGS 685 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,SUITE 3500 EXHIBIT LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 213-532-3295 FOR PREPARED BY: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 18823 MDS CONSULTING RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 1732 REDHILL AVENUE,SUITE 350 • IRVINE,CA 92614 Feb.3,2012 949-251-8821 SNEU 1 OF 1 L 1814001 5N18Zj tW Exhibit tot nY 18823.dwg 2103I12 D, E, F- 48 I I I TPM PM N0. I 1 PARCEL 01 I PAR1550 15550 1 j- 19367 I PARCEL 21 I I- �(HABER) J I I I I (q1 BLUE SKY CT. I I I / I 1 1 1 I 1 I C- 1 I I I TTM NO. 18823 I 0 1 0 m Q 1 31 v\ rC I TTM NO. 18823 1 I �/ �C SCALE 1"=200' lyJ U V I i �. -T 1LEGEND: PHOTO INDEX NUMBER I �- L PHOTO INDEX MAP TTM NO. 18823 �� 1 P i ���� ♦ ,���q�r.`Q7��Sl+tt�l' w .! t - ._a 1 • r` � F r I � � 7 ,�����r7 ar.]►f� �y� iia. .. 4 ,k,,,r. 1rV L � ` S ♦ X... ( 3 ` 1`'p'ir �.` r ••�711b. ' >; s .i.. rp�F' i M i. +2,7 ,' ��� 1 r - err � N3'* -.� r � 5.�. M ! r .' ( r. r,• -Y�♦� ••r. ♦"V, .! "{/��t .n:�' _:r'� }' r� _V Y y� � �} ♦M �� iq s V r M r5. � •� . ` �a � 7� J Jt}� G r �Yl s }r,� i f . ♦. i�Y` r��'.: s P, ` 'Jr .� � yY a}{� �. A �. �,. f�r�$'!rQ w � G S , , t� .: fit s ,�,��1'` ' .`k'.. ♦ b'c<' ♦ y •S y 11 < J A'�t�Y L `{'¢��ydl♦ `nti \ ( W.APr { '• i� 1 Y 1 i �y._ iii' ♦ f rj i{ 1' T r tn• � ,y �� � ra� rg � ',( rF a Y. I ;; �1 1 , Is � ♦ .�� �� � (r ='.1 / rC� t w, , rM� a �. ,.K� - a ` LI brxT jv.',wT • I l 1-1 � ,. itis p �^.KIT F � '• � - -' L � n ' 1^ t if���•+..�? I � 11 / _ } �.rs - � e .•r - ' , �{�P� �i.91 � ""�i1 fir•_ { �Wdiy. r r _.'r _ e r L Le•r.- n e/ + lam '' FEI ✓'" Y —•LRS-lNi.' I��y^vf{�.+s� -�F i �/. Zr�T�brr_ ._'IJ-r;Jt�.:� "-.. -. _ f "'F`�! �. . PHOTO • • TTM • �t c+') # N 00 000 oIV ill ro a 7 ,. M .F' I , iso Ir 1^ �+ ,r�l'IAr '�✓;h x11 ` t r �I1 e ♦ 1 ( y,�/ /♦l t 1 •4 141 - .� / , ?� 1 i Y ` D,L,F -53 CM # 00 0c Od i 1 3; 'r .':fit•; t, , is D,E, F-s4 _yc � .prf� - F��4�-- 'aR•"Y r f t •- l TgZ'a r!� yea l ` >. lo • • #6 TTM . . Q fr;� 4 • �� T! f f}�'l t� 'i'jr yf i "5 ,� �5��-.,�-�h1-� ' _ c. r •f dI jja ' f y�"'.9 -•�/r". 11 - r 1 . 77, .a h. .T � l ., f ,.1r r r ;� •�`�� r r �,�t.)•�t/ !'•f f .t r ` f Nq� tK YL al rip / / 4 1 .r q t v i. r h i+ri .•r {� r r�;,�.• �',� ' 1 !A r�i9: � f �r r �' ��ty�'�v(f1(�/j'l�>.,p r ._( `e � �,'�' � moi. - yy�r�I/R' �f'1 � :� .1/'w�.,l�i '�K=�'1 �'•�ri� y f� �^� T Y� Iv � - ➢ r � v i} t����'�{,rf •�/R ��-� p/�T;�l� Y. �::' ISI r., I r ' �n ik rfrl¢r` f jS115 ' � " Vg i� 1 1 yr Jh. 4j Ft? 6�•r FF 1 PHOTO #8 TTM N0. 18823 i (Q7� F b 'A 'l 1 d '\��R t L r fY1j sY A j y { • t` li• .� zi. ::P ' � Lrx�l�'r 4 'r�$$$$$'►�'t rte'.. ^F73i A�.}. /�M �C'F���7•`�1N �� I T ii FFF .�`'�'. Qd"/.�. •.s Rif R. ,�% .._tEf�'�,�.i CV• •.A.!�dW A'�.h.+5: q. �3`.l3{it�ltl�ls ns>HRi�a'v'..:'� . :�-1.Lv'.f . � aa Z PHOTO #9 TTM N0. 18823 R `20 ♦ r. ( ''� >< �n�•a.� r � �} r.lf C� 1 � h° p l a ��y_ w r r. ,. '.�e.: ff�' d S v ^r,, � •�r}i • ^s.A � � 4 f-� �' #A 'r �•'{y{ A ' f , J '- 9 y, Y YJ PHOTO #10 TTM N0. 18823 n Aw •t ha ) W) � fA1+�Y Am fF, iryr �✓ '•'nom xr l '�� • ti r Brt�r ' fyj9,T" 71 jIJW .clrr �.i. r V { � - - -L' + `aT:i� ` //t♦ v ;� ' tip''\ ! c c �•! �. `\ S f 'i fy `:::� ) d . +rst)}CCK !'- � ... ._ `+ k PHOTO • • TTM • 18823 ' Y rya wt4y �5�'� � i,t � K '`! i 5r ,v 4'a' y� .• C x � �. Vt�"t R "` ..� '�r tbf v� i S l k ..f� +Q! ,fa �St7l�!��t 3 '"R'� •'_., � h�'4'�,• ?;. �� 1. y•, q.`;e 'rte +'y � � � \ #j1 }yJr . � t v � �.t Fri �:+. �,: lad ,A � it S. �1 � a �• � \ ft �� Si �� �(1 F R'S d , v .y, i �.:'� � �. 'LA v1 , t��� r" i 7�. {♦ �. `'i» � r � >.. ��'1 r�" .j��� "�,�' t �1Sy� � "Y ,y,. rt �agrr'�`��� �T�h�i �1 S, S � t '� '�a V,Aj � ��^, ��'1�\ �..F'� � �,��• � -.v it .'.-d �.� 44 AN_ � � i r,� IrN S A.i_l r,o �t ti .-. �\ a t13 1''! i /. .r k �C r• r. City of Rancho Cucamonga _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM x INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 2. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2011-00513 and Variance DRC2012-00135 3. Description of Project: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, Minor Exception dRC2011-00513 and Variance DRC2012-00135 - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single-family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land and to allow for an 8-foot tall wall on Lot 2 and a request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 124 feet on proposed Lot 9. The project site is located in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court. APN: 0226-081-15, 16 & 17. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Jonathan C. Curtis, Receiver 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, Ca 90017 • 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential 6. Zoning: Very Low Residential in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The project site consists of two rectangular shaped parcels and one puzzle shaped parcel totaling 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant would like to subdivide the parcels into 19 single-family residential lots. The parcels are mostly vacant with two partially built homes on two of the three parcels and located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road and south of Blue Sky Court. To the north of the project are vacant flood control land and three single-family residences, to the south is vacant land, and to the east across Wardman Bullock Road are existing single-family residences and to the west is the flood control basin. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, ,or participation agreement): • GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD— Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report EXHIBIT H D,E, F- 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 2 FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report • FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM10— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G — Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓)Agricultural Resources (✓)Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology& Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas (✓) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Transportation/Traffic Significance • DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or • mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. D, E, F- 64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 3 • Prepared By: Date: Reviewed By: IVY Date: • • D,E, F- 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 4 Less Than • Signi 11 Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mibpabon Sianificant No Impact Incorporated Imoact Imoaq EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? O O O (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C) The site is located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road generally south of Blue Sky Court and is characterized by 3 single-family dwelling units on Blue Sky Court which is along the north property line, with single-family residential development to the east, vacant land to the south and west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because the project is consistent with the area and there are existing single- family residences on three sides of the project site. Design review is required prior to approval and is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines by meeting the minimum lot dimensions and lot sizes. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? • b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? D, E, F- 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 5 • less Than S,pificanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PpleNiant wun man pp g SigniScant MNgati9pni(¢am No Impact Iptompratatetl Imvact Impact C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest O O O (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road generally south of Blue Sky Court and is characterized by 3 single-family dwelling units on Blue Sky Court which is along the north property line, with single-family residential development to the east, vacant land to the south and west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. • e) The site is located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road generally south of Blue Sky Court and is characterized by 3 single-family dwelling units on Blue Sky Court which is along the north property line, single-family residential development to the east, and vacant D, E, F- 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 6 Less Than • Significant Less chenialWho ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: &9h;ficant Mitigation Signifcant No Impact Inmroarated Imoact Impact land to the south and west. Although there is grazing land adjacent to the north and west boundaries of the project site this area has been isolated from the wildlife interface by the construction of a flood control basin to the west and the construction of homes to the north, south, and east of the project site. There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) • concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AOMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage • transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this D, E, F- 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBT718823 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Ppmentiantlly wan an PP 9 Significant Mnigauon SigniLcani Impact Incprppratetl Imoad Im.aoaq include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the • regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc December 20, 2011 that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model. URBEMIS 2007 Version 9.2.4 methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts } Emissfons,(pounds per,day) ,Source Cs0:VOCE NO . . COz Paving 3.0 16.58 12.31 0.0 1.4 1.3 1,912.46 Site Grading 2.72 22.00 12.42 0.0 7.353 2.33 2,371.66 w/mitigation • Building 3.25 14.40 12.94 0.0 0.98 0.89 2,073.35 Construction Painting 5.88 0.01 0.21 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.57 D, E, F- 69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 8 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigatmn Significant No Impact the orated Impact Impact Maximum Daily 5.88 22.00 12.94 0.0 7.35 2.3 2,371.66 Emissions ' Significance 75 100 550 150 150 55 N/A2 Threshold Significant No No No No No No N/A Impact? Note:The maximum daily emissions refer to the maximum emissions that would occur in one day. VOG = Volatile organic compounds; NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = oxides sulfur oxides; PM10 and PM2.5 = particulate matter ' Construction activities are not expected to overlap except during paving and painting: therefore the maximum emissions represent the largest of each activity alone and the combined paving and 2painting emissions. There is no significance threshold for CO2. s Indicates mitigated emissions levels. Source of thresholds: South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011 a. Source of Emissions:Appendix A: CaIEEMod Output Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site • grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCS and are part of the 03 precursors. There will be residential building proposed for the project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 5.88 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre- • coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a D, E, F- 70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 9 • Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp g significant "tioation significant No Impact Incorograted Impact tmgact high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small • and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) During project construction, construction equipment shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines, so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was D, E, F- 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 10 Less Than • SignifmanlLess Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant 64tigaaon $ignificam No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil • during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMIO emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans • include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. D, E, F- 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 11 • less Than Significant Less Potentially Wltn TM1en Issues and Supporting Information Sources: slgmficam Mitigation Significant No Imedct Inco orated Impact Impact The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM3,5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Long Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residents in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on- site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors included in the Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc on December 20, 2011, long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the URBEMIS 2007 shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the • corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions- the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 2) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 3) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 4) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). D, E, F- 73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBT 18823 Page 12 less Tnan • Sgmficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S,p,fi alnt wim Than PP g Significant Mitigation Slg Oanl M.I. Iact Incomoratetl Imoactc� impact C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes;-residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 5) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning • Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2006 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) throuah habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the • California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? D,E,F- 74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 13 • Less Than Signiith Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Finamiany whn man PP 9 Slgnifcant Mitigation Sg isCt md m t No IvaInc Imvacl Imvad C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, • the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources: the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR). The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residential uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure for single-family residential units north of the site and along the east property line for the construction of public right of way. The site was also partially graded during the construction of two single-family residences in the middle of the site. The grazing land adjacent to the site has been isolated from the wild life interface by the construction of a flood control basin to the west and homes to the north, south and east of the project site. According to the Biological Constraints Analysis prepared by PCR Services Corporation on January 25, 2012 the 12.9-acre project site is comprised of a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub community of approximately 6.4 acres. The RAFSS plant community is comprised of approximately 6 acres that is natural and undisturbed by human activity and approximately 0.4-acre that has been disturbed by human activity such as grading, vegetation removal, and dumping. Approximately 4.8 acres of the project is comprised of disturbed land that has been disrupted by human activity to the extent that the results are barren areas lacking vegetation and/or colonization by new, typically non-native, weedy species. The remaining 1.7 acres of the project site is developed land. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented to offset the removal of the 6.4 acres of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub: 1) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 6.4 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified • mitigation bank) at a minimum of the equivalent to 6.4 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. D,E, F- 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 14 ess Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potenlioy With Than PP 9 S,nlficanl Miliaaton Significant No Impact Income ated Imoact Impact According to the results of the Sensitive Species Survey prepared by PCR services Corporation on August 28, 2012, "in an email communication dated January 24, 2012, Dr. Michael O'Farrell, an experienced mammologist who has trapped the area extensively, stated he has failed to find San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat in the vicinity and considers the habitat in the study area unsuitable. The San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat is adapted to breeding in flood deposited alluvial materials in sandy soils mixed with boulders and cobbles where Riversidean Alluvial Fan Scrub vegetation, a natural community not found in the study area is widely spaced. The study area is in an area where the granitic derived soils are coarse and rocky and is covered by Riversidean Sage Scrub where the vegetation is dense and closely spaced, which is not suitable for the SBKR." According to the same Sensitive Species Survey, "focused/absence surveys were conducted for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher...by Michael Misenhelter...between the dates of May 12 to June 23, 2012. No Coastal California Gnatcatchers were detected." Therefore no adverse impacts to special status species are anticipated There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily and it was observed that 90 individual lily plants were observed scattered across the site during the sensitive plant survey conducted on May 29, 2012 by PCR biologist Bob Huttar and on August 21, 2012 by PCR biologists Ezekiel Cooley and Bob Huttar. Although Plummer's mariposa lily is not federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 2) The project applicant shall prepare a Plummer's mariposa lily mitigation plan • prior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. The plan shall consist of transplantation or other methods of removal including "set aside" and transplantation at a receiver site(s), bulb collection or bulb augmentation within a greenhouse for future transplantation under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. The receiver site(s) shall be ecologically suitable and shall include the recordation of a conservation easement or deed restriction. According to the same Sensitive Species Survey on January 5, 2012 a Phase I Habitat Assessment for burrowing owls was conducted by PCR biologists Maile Tanaka and Bob Huttar. Potentially suitable habitat was found in the center of the study area on the eastern border within the disturbed areas. A Phase II Burrow Survey within the potentially suitable habitat areas was conducted on May 29, 2012 by PCR biologist Bob Huttar. No burrows or signs of burrows were detected. The same Sensitive Species Survey on January 5, 2012 states, "furthermore, in email communication dated January 24, 2012, Mike Misenhalter stated that during the course of his Coastal California Gnatcatcher surveys he found the area lacked the required openness to support burrowing owls because there were too many small shrubs and weeds growing on the property." No riparian habitat exists on-site. Therefore no adverse impact is anticipated b) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is located within in the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFFS) habitat. According to the Sensitive Species Survey prepared by PCR services Corporation on January 25, 2012 a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub plant community covers approximately 6.4 acres. The area has been fragmented from the wildlife corridor • by the construction of the flood control basin to the west and the single-family residential development to the north, south, and east; however the Etiwanda Creek and the San D, E, F- 76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 15 • ess Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Tnan PP g significant Mitigation significant o Imotty Incomorated Impact Imoad Sevaine Preserve continue to provide a corridor for migrating wildlife. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 3) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 6.4 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank) at a minimum of the equivalent to 6.4 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment.. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. In the vicinity of the project site the Etiwanda Fan, wildlife movement corridors have been identified as the Etiwanda Creek Wash area and the San Sevaine Wash area down to the Santa Ana River. The project site is nearly surrounded by residential housing on the north, south and east. A levee that is part of the Etiwanda Spreading Ground borders the • western edge of the site. This development along with the freeways in the vicinity of the project site has cut off any potential corridors. Therefore the development of the project site would not substantially affect wildlife movement in the area and no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site, therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? • Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.18. There will be no impact. D, E, F- 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Faalwith Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant MiOgatiSignifica Imoacl lncorp.haad Imoac l nt Imna cl b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered • before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or D, E, F- 78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 17 • Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Sign"neent No Imnact Incorporated Impact Impact preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. • d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been partially disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments and the construction of two single-family residences on site. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? O O O (✓) D, E,F- 79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 18 Less Than • Stgnifiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mtlicatmn Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoact Impact b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1 mile west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lays approximately 2/3 of a mile north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 5 miles northeasterly • of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 9 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce Pi emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMIO emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to • minimize Pi emissions from the site during such episodes. D, E, F- 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 19 • Less Than 9s Tant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnh rhan PP 9 Significant Mitigatmn Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,, emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically excessively drained and highly permeable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) () indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) 5-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH,], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydro fluorocarbons [HFCs], per fluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions • of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. D, E, F- 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 20 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inconoorated Impact Imoact The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approved a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with • emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PMio, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMtg, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. • D, E, F- 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 21 • Less Than S'gr" and Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fotentla0y With roan PP g Significant W9ahon Significant No Impact Incomorated Impact Impact Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Analysis prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc on December 20, 2011 the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydro fluorocarbons [HFCs], per fluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF61) and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the table the proposed project would result in a total of 266.9MTCO2eq/yr from Energy Use and 363 MTCO2eq/yr for Natural Gas and 2,147.8MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 2,777.7 MTCO2eq/yr, Greenhouse Gas Emissions During Operation (MTPY1 Co2 N20 CH4 Mtpy Mtpy mtpy mtpy mtpy CO2EQ CO2EQ Mobil Source 2,147.8 0.0 0.0 0.10 2.10 Energy Use 266.9 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.21 Natural Gas 363.0 0.01 3.10 0.56 11.76 • Total (mtpy) 2,777.7 0.0 3.1 0.7 14.07 Total 0.0028 (Teragrams CO2 equivalent) Notes:MTPY1=metric tons per year mitigated Source:Operational GHG emission calculations(Appendix B) Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH, is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: • 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. D, E,F- 83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 22 Less Than i • sgmficam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 significant mogadon significam No Impact hComorated moact Impact 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City • at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the subdivision of approximately 13 acres of land into 19 lots for the future construction of 17 single-family residences and the completion of two partially built homes and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, fiber optic communications infrastructure, sidewalks, and fire defensible space. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. . The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, local trails that connect to Community Trails, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a • significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: D, E, F- 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Withito an pp 9 Significant c.,g.Iate SiImpactnt No Impact Incorporated Imoatl Impact 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • & Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. The proposed project will result in 2,795 MTCOZeq/yr (total project emissions) of • operational related emission without reduction from project design features. Based on the reduction measures proposed for the project and the Mitigation Measures the project would reduce its GHG emission to 2,777 MTCOZeq/yr which is below the "business as usual" scenario. D,E , F- 85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 24 Less Than • S,gnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sown Tally with Than PP 9 Significant mg.w Significant No Imoact Incomorated Imoact Impad b) The project proposes the subdivision of approximately 13 acres of vacant land into 19 single-family residential lots. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes General Plan Policy LU-2.3: Provide direct pedestrian access connections between development projects where possible is accomplished by_local equestrian and walking trails that connect to the Rancho Cucamonga trail system such as community trails in the area. General Plan Policy LU-10.1: Continue to require implementation of the City's Water Efficient Ordinance is accomplished by requiring all new developments to submit landscape plans that illustrate that they meet all the requirements of the ordinance. General Plan Policy CM-2.1: Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide is again accomplished by connecting this project to the City's Community Trail that connects with both local and regional trails throughout the city by implementing the principles of the City's Trail Implementation Plan. General Plan Policy RC-3.1: Require the use of cost-effective methods to conserve water in new developments and promote appropriate water conservation and efficiency measures for existing businesses and residences by promoting water drip irrigation and requiring all construction meet the • building code Title 24. And General Plan Policy PF-7.1: Continue to adopt programs and practices that minimize the amount of materials entering the waste stream. Encourage recycling and composting is all sectors of the community, including recycling of construction and demolition materials, in order to divert items from entering landfills. This is done by requiring builders to submit a deposit to the city which requires the builder to recycle at least 50 percent of the construction materials. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, local trail that connect to Community trails, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping and, therefore, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. B. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeabie upset and accident conditions involving the release of • hazardous materials into the environment? D, E, F- 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigator Significant No Imoact Incorporated Impact Impact C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? • h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant • impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest schools, Etiwanda Colonies at 13144 Banyan Street and Summit Intermediate School at 5959 East D,E, F- 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 26 Less Tnan • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information SPotemiauy wan Than PP gormaources: Significant Mibgation Significant No I noact Incoroonned Impact Impact Avenue, are about 1 mile southwest of the project site. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, • including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. The project is located with the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. The City recognizes the risk and has adopted policies and Standard Conditions that limit uses to Very Low density residential development and Hillside residential uses in these areas to limit property exposed to wildland fire hazards. The project shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan to outline appropriate measures to address fire hazards. Therefore, the following wiidland fire mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. • D, E, F- 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incgmorateti Impact Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, • which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial • activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. D, E, F- 89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 28 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant M;tigafion Significant No Impact Incamoratea Impact I moaq Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) • for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by MDS Consulting on June 18, 2012, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated,through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of • grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance D, E, F- 90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 29 • F n t Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pote,1Wiy Than PP 9 ignificant significantImpact ed Impact Impact program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting on June 18, 2012 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be • monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Oficial and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered • significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape D,E, F- 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 30 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mtigatmn SigniBcam No Impact Incomoratatl Impact Impatl proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for the subdivision of approximately 13 acres of land into 19 single-family lots for the future construction of single-family residences; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local • drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as D, E, F- 92 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 31 • Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pomually wan man PP g 4mcam Wtigaoon significant No Impact Incorporated Imoact Imoact shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? • C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road generally south of Blue Sky Court and is characterized by single-family development to the north and east, with two single-family residences to the south and vacant land to the west and near the northwest portion of the project. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Very Low Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. General Plan Policy LU-2.3: Provide direct pedestrian access connections between development projects where possible is accomplished by local equestrian and walking trails that connect to the Rancho Cucamonga trail system such as community trails in the area. General Plan Policy LU-10.1: Continue to require implementation of the City's Water Efficient Ordinance is accomplished by requiring all new developments to submit landscape plans that illustrate that they meet all the requirements of the ordinance. General Plan Policy CM-2.1: Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide is again accomplished by connecting this project to the City's Community Trail that connects with both local and regional trails throughout the City by implementing the principles of the City's Trail Implementation Plan. General Plan Policy RC-3.1: Require the use of cost- effective methods to conserve water in new developments and promote appropriate water conservation and efficiency measures for existing businesses and residences by • promoting water drip irrigation and requiring all construction meet the building code Title 24. And General Plan Policy PF-7.1: Continue to adopt programs and practices that minimize the amount of materials entering the waste stream. Encourage recycling and composting in all sectors of the community, including recycling of construction and D, E,F- 93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 32 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant mtigaaon Significant No Imoact Incorootated Imaact Impact demolition materials, in order to divert items from entering landfills. This is done by requiring builders to submit a deposit to the City which requires the builder to recycle at least 50 percent of the construction materials. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City • General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in O (✓) O ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • D, E, F- 94 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 33 • Less Than 9gnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: potentially With Than PP 9 Significant MnioaLon Significant No Imoacl Incomgfate, ImDacl Imoacl f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. According to a Noise Analysis prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on January 16, 2012 noise attenuation falls about 12 dB with windows open so all buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation will be required for rooms nearest Wardman Bullock Road in Lots 11, 12, 17 and 18. A Mitigation'Measure has been included to mitigate construction related noise during grading of the site. Exterior., 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. • Interior: Specific mitigation measures for interior noise impacts are not possible at this time as the project does not include a house product. Mitigation measures cannot be established without knowing the design of the houses. Therefore: 1) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related activities such as the use of earthmoving and construction equipment, arrival/departure of contractors' vehicles and material delivery vehicles, and the construction of the building itself may create vibration impacts. However, these impacts will be short term and less than significant when the activities are conducted in compliance with the mitigation measures listed below and the Development Code. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to • mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 0,E, F- 95 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 34 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially caThan PP g m Significant mamabon Significant No Impact Incomorated Impact Imoact 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: • 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? D, E, F- 96 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB 7718823 Page 35 • Less Than Significant Lean Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant M't'g.tan Wale Significant Mai Imoect Incomoldletl Imoatt Imoad Comments: a) The project site is located in an area that is predominantly developed. There are 2 partially constructed single-family homes on the project site but otherwise the site is predominately vacant. The proposed project is for the subdivision of the project site into 19 lots for the purpose of future construction of 17 single-family homes and completion of the construction of the existing 2 partially constructed single-family homes. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. b) There are 2 partially constructed single-family homes on the project site but otherwise the site is predominately vacant. Because the property is mostly vacant and the 2 houses that are on the property are unoccupied; there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. C) There are 2 partially constructed single-family homes on the project site but otherwise the site is predominately vacant. Because the property is mostly vacant and the 2 houses that are on the property are unoccupied there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. • 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Comments: a) The site, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road at Blue Sky Court, would be served by Fire Station #6 located at 5840 East Avenue approximately 0.6 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and D, E, F- 97 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 36 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Sign14cant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact (m act will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Legacy Park located at 5858 Santa Ynez Place about 0.5-mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in • library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Legacy Park located at 5858 Santa Ynez Place about 0.5-mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • D, E, F- 98 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 37 • Less Tnan LessS,grdce n Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Tnan pp g 99nific8nt Mitigation Signifwnt No Imn= incor-or-ted Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? • d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 181.83 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the subdivision of approximately 13 acres into 19 lots for future development of detached single-family homes (2 of these single-family homes have been partially constructed). The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single- family detached dwelling unit will generate 9.57 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is developed with existing street improvements or will be included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each detached single-family dwelling unit will generate 1.75 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San D, E, F- 99 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 38 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoact Imoact Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions_ to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is being developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during • construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is residential. Although houses are not part of the proposal, when the houses are submitted for review, adequate parking, specifically an enclosed garage and a driveway, in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code will be required. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • D,E, F- 100 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 39 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan Than PP 9 Significant ma"abon S,gni6cant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in. wastewater generation for build out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding • solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. b,C, F- 101 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 40 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmenuantlly With Than PP 9 Significant Mtigation Significant No Imoact Incomorated ImDaCt Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • Comments: a) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources: the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR). The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residential uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure for single-family residential units north of the site and along the east property line for the construction of public right of way. The site was also partially graded during the construction of two single-family residences in the middle of the site. The grazing land adjacent to the site has been isolated from the wild life interface by the construction of a flood control basin to the west and homes to the north, south and east of the project site. According to the Biological Constraints Analysis prepared by PCR Services Corporation on January 25, 2012 the 12.9-acre project site is comprised of a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub community of approximately 6.4 acres. The RAFSS plant community is comprised of approximately 6 acres that is natural and undisturbed by human activity and approximately 0.4-acre that has been disturbed by human activity such as grading, vegetation removal, and dumping. Approximately 4.8 acres of the project is comprised of disturbed land that has been disrupted by human activity to the extent that the results are barren areas lacking vegetation and/or colonization by new, typically non-native, weedy . species. The remaining 1.7 acres of the project site is developed land. With the incorporation of the attached mitigation measures to offset the removal of the 6.4 acres of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, the proposed project will have a less-than- significant impact. • According to the results of the Sensitive Species Survey prepared by PCR services Corporation on August 28, 2012, "in email communication dated January 24, 2012, Dr. D, E, F- 102 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 41 • Less Than S'pihwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Petenually with Than PP 9 S,rnficant Mitigation S,anihcarh No Imoad In6amorated Imoad Imoad Michael O'Farrell, an experienced mammologist who has trapped the area extensively, stated he has failed to find San Bernardino Kangaroo Rats in the vicinity and considers the habitat in the study area unsuitable. The San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat is adapted to breeding in flood deposited alluvial materials in sandy soils mixed with boulders and cobbles where Riversidean Alluvial Fan Scrub vegetation, a natural community not found in the study area is widely spaced. The study area is in an area where the granitic derived soils are coarse and rocky and is covered by Riversidean Sage Scrub where the vegetation is dense and closely spaced, which is not suitable for the SBKR." According to the same Sensitive Species Survey, "focused/absence surveys were conducted for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher...by Michael Misenhelter...between the dates of May 12 to June 23, 2012. No Coastal California Gnatcatcher were detected." Therefore no adverse impacts to special status species are anticipated. There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily and it was observed that 90 individual lily plants were observed scattered across the site during the sensitive plant survey conducted on May 29, 2012 by PCR biologist Bob Huttar and on August 21, 2012 by PCR biologists Ezekiel Cooley and Bob Huttar. Although Plummer's mariposa lily is not federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered, with the incorporation of the attached mitigation measure, the proposed project will have a less-than-significant impact. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop • the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PER or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately D, E,F- 103 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 42 analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects • were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan.FPEIR (SC H#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (T) Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH #89012314, certified April 1, 1992) (T) Air Quality Impact Study RK Engineering Group, Inc, Revised December 20 , 2011 (T) Water Quality Management Report • MDS Consulting, June 18, 2012 (T) Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract 18823 Mestre Greve Associates a Division of Landrum & Brown, January 16, 2012 (T) Sensitive Species Survey PCR Services Corporation, August 28, 2012 (T) Biological Constraints Analysis PCR Services Corporation, January 25, 2012 • D, E, F- 104 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 Page 43 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that 1 am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial.Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clea no significa t1env�effects would occur. r1l �— Applicant's Signatur : Date: I 'q , 13 Print Name an Title; 1 Cui cu:s R-Q cp—1 In P> cdp- e-n-h-Reo. Preferle-z2 Bank v, w i to I c rx�1�s� L, P. , etc):-,L 3CLI E)e )-tcI,-CL6-20 5Lcpert0r Case, Nb . 1ot2(,9(,, D, E, F 105 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 Applicant: Jonathan Curtis Initial Study Prepared by: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner Date: 11-26-12 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance During project construction, construction equipment PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per , manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records M shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 o developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD SO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: 1 of 14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. o • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 M by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of 0 construction. J Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM1o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. • 2. 4 • Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible . . . Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Implementing Action Date/initials Non-Compliance The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. ; All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 M required to incorporate thermal pane windows and , weather-stripping. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 @ shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resoufces �'.' e The developer shall purchase and preserve a PD B ., Review of plans B 2 minimum of 6.4 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank) at a minimum of equivalent to 6.4 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. 3of14 Mitigation , . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verificati6n Date/initials Non-Compliance The project applicant shall prepare a Plummer's PD B Review of plans B 2/4 mariposa lily mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. The plan shall consist of transplantation or other methods of removal including "set aside' and transplantation at a receiver site(s), bulb collection or bulb augmentation within a greenhouse for future transplantation under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. The receiver site(s)shall be ecologically suitable and shall include the recordation of a conservation easement or deed restriction. The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 6.4 acres of suitable off-site mitigation o land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees(mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank)at a minimum of the equivalent to 6.4 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Alluvial ec2' Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. _ GreenhbuseaGas Emissions The project must comply with all rules that assist in BO C During A 4 reducing short-term air pollutant emission in Construction compliance with SCAW MD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. The construction contractor shall select construction BO C During A 4 equipment based on low-emission factors and high Construction energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 BO C During A 4 minutes. Construction 4of14 0 0 0 0 0 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. . . . f Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Freq'b�ncy Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in BO C During A 4 lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where Construction feasible Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with BO FA During A 4 peak-hour traffic Construction Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported BO During A 4 and encouraged for construction crew. Construction Construction and Building materials shall be produced BO During C 2 and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Construction Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound o (VOC) materials. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code BO A Review of Plans C 2 „ Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: o Increased insulation Limit air leakage through the structure Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems Install light colored"cool"roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 5of14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy BO A Review of plans C 2 appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless o urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. CE A Review of Plans C 2 Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 6of14 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-Compliance To conserve water, the following measures shall be BO A Review of plans C 2 implemented into the site design, to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: • The project shall comply with City Efficient Landscape Ordinance, regardless of the size of the landscaped area. Implement water conservation measures to provide at least a 15 percent reduction in water consumption beyond that required by regulation. The homebuyer shall be provided with local resources on drought-tolerant plants to be used for 0 landscaping. T • Do not impose minimum grass/turf amounts anywhere on the project site. Require the landscape palette to provide a minimum of 40 percent drought-resistant species and to offer landscape design that exclude turf/grass. Install low flow appliances(i.e.,toilets,dishwashers, shower heads, washing machines, etc.). The project shall comply with voluntary energy BO B Review of plans C 2 efficiency measures included in one of the following programs or other program approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development certification (the most recent version), Green Point Rating, or CalGreen (the mandatory measures and a minimum of three residential Tier 1 and or Tier 2 voluntary measures). Verification of certification/compliance shall be submitted to the City pursuant to City requirements. 7of14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Cultural-Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to lake appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 o incorporation of archaeological sites within new �„ developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 warchaeological heritage of the area. Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 8of14 0 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification D. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section PD B/C Review of A/D 3/4 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to Plans/Report eliminate adverse project effects on significant, During important, and unique prehistoric resources, Construction including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites,capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: A Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify,and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary reportand transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 9of14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Geology and Soils � F The site shall be treated with water or other BO CDuring A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 o speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hazards and Waste Materials' The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 California Building Code(CBC),which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters Hydrology and.Water Quality' Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 114 • 0 0 0 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials N.on-Compliance An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 ^' sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. m During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by AEI CASC Consulting August 2009 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 11 of 14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant o Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise k Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a BO B Review of Plans C 2 construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Construction or grading shall not take place between BO C During A 4 the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. When an application for the development of homes on BO/PD C Review of Plans C the project site is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigation measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. 12 of 14 0 0 0 Mitigation Measures No. I hs' ibW Monitoring Tithing of Method of Verified Sanctions for . . Date/initials Non-Compliance Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed BO C During A 4 the standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early PD C During A 2 !" as possible in the first phase. construction T Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction o, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Respon'sible�Peilson Monitoring Freduency Method;of,Verification Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation 13 of 14 i:\planning\flnai\ceqa\m m chklst-rev12-4-06final.doc 0 T T 14 of 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT18823,VARIANCE 2012-00135 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D,E, F- 120 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT18823; DRC2012-00135; DRC2012-00513; Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • D, E, F- 121 u uti cu a U." From: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD CONTROL • LAND DEVELOPMENT&CONSTRUCTION • OPERATIONS CDUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • SURVEYOR • TRANSPORTATION n 825 East Third Street • Ban Bernardino,CA 924150835 • (909)387.8104GERRY NEWCOMBE '� Fax (909)387-8130 Director of Public Works January 8, 2013 File: 10(ENV)-4.01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 RE: CEQA— NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TENTATIVE TRACT 18823 To whom it may concern: Thank you for giving the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. We received this request on December 17, 2012 and pursuant to our review, the following comments are provided: Water Resources Division (Grant Mann P.E. Chief, (909) 387-8213): 1 . It is assumed that the local agencies will establish adequate provisions for intercepting and • conducting accumulated drainage flows around or through the improvement sites in a manner that will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 2. If any encroachment is anticipated on San Bernardino County Flood Control District (District) Right of Way, a permit must be obtained from the District's Permits/Operations Support Division. Environmental Management Division (Brandy Wood Ecological Resource Specialist(909) 387-7971): 1. The proposed project is located within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat(Dipodomys merriami parvus)(SBKR). SBKR is a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. We appreciate the email communication with Dr. Michael O'Farrell regarding the.suitability of the project site for SBKR; however during protocol trapping sessions the species was trapped within 0.5 mile of the project area in an area parallel to the project location with similar habitat in 2011. Additionally, the proposed project is adjacent to proposed mitigation lands established for the conservation of SBKR and Califomia gnatcatcher. Consultation with the USFWS is required anytime a proposed action is likely to affect any listed species (Endangered Species Act, Section 10(a) (1) (B). To ensure during project related activities there are no impacts to SBKR, consultation with USFWS is needed. Board of Suinmr,rs • GREGORY C.DEVEREAUX ROBERT A.LCVINGOOD . Fi I Dislicl JAM'S RWO$ .. Thld Di:eic; Chief EAeculive Off c, JANICE RUTHERFORD Second Dred GARY C.OVITi ..Form D¢Iricl JO Ic C01'ZAL'e5 Me Discua EXHIBIT S D, E, F- 122 0110912013 10:SU ;yra r.uuouw From: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. Comments re: Mitigated Negative Declaration • for Tentative Tract 18823 Page 2 of 2 2. Page 14 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), section b states "a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub plant community covers approximately 6.4 acres... has been fragmented from the wildlife corridor by the construction of the flood control basin to the west." We disagree and point out that the flood control basin construction and mitigation lands were built and established to maintain the continuity of the habitat. Approximately 150 acres are preserved north of the basin and 170 acres to the south, both of these areas are adjacent and potentially impacted by the proposed project. Impacts to the mitigation lands adjacent to the proposed project site have not been thoroughly addressed. 3. Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub and Chamise chaparral, on-site vegetation types, are adapted and require the natural fire regime present in southern California. Furthermore, the proposed project site is located adjacent to District land, set aside as mitigation established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. This land is covered with fire adapted vegetation and was not established to be modified for adjacent residential development. The MND does not identify the location of the required fire break required by City of Rancho Cucamonga, nor does it address the impacts of the establishment and maintenance of the fire/fuel break to ensure the safety of the community and how it will impact the adjacent habitat conservation land. This identification and impact analysis would be required in a complete CEQA analysis. 4. Page 32, Section 10 c of the MND states..."According to the General Plan Figure RC-4 • and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan." The project area is within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. Furthermore, Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub, the vegetation present on-site is considered to be a sensitive plant Community identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Consultation with both agencies (USFWS and CDFW) is needed to address impacts to these sensitive biological resources. If you have any questions, please contact the individuals who provided the specific comment, as listed above. Sincer, y, ANNESLE GNATIUS, P.E. Deputy Director— Land Development & Construction ARI:PE:nh/CEQA Comments_MND Clty of Rancho Cucamonga TT 188233Jonathan Curtis • D, E, F- 123 JONATHAN CURTIS, as RECEIVER • 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Main'. (213).532-3286 M08. (818) 653-6157 joncurtis@sbcglobal.net January 16, 2013 Via Email and U.S. Mail Mr. Steve Fowler City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91.729 Re: Planning Commission Meeting of January 9,2013 as continued to Januan'23,2013: Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map 18823 (the "Project'), Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 and Variance DRC 2012-00135 Dear Mr. Fowler: • After reviewing the County of San Bernardino. Department of Public Works letter dated January 8, 2013 ("County of San Bernardino Comment Letter") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City'), Planning Department, in reference to the above-entitled matter,no new impacts were identified. Therefore, no new analysis or mitigation measures were required. Furthermore, attached for your reference and files, is the response, prepared by PCR Services Corporation ("PCR"), the Biological Consultant that prepared the Biological constraints Analysis for TTM 18823. The attachment from PCR, is in response to the comments made in the County of San Bernardino Comment Letter. If you have any further comments and/or questions, please feel free to give me a call at(818) 653-6157. Best regards, pnat&M C',uxa-3 Jonathan Curtis, as Receiver cc: Stan Morse(MDS Consulting) Beth Martinez(PCR Services Corporation) Brenda Vargas • EXHIBIT C D, E, F- 124 JONATHAN CURTIS, as RECEIVER 865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3500 • Los Angeles, CA 90071 Main: (213).532-3286 MOB: (818) 653-6157 loncurtis@sbcglobal.net January 16, 2013 Via Email and U.S. Mail Mr. Steve Fowler City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 Re: Planning Commission Meeting of January 9,2013 as continued to January 23,2013: Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map 18823 (the"Project"), Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 and Variance DRC 2012-00135 Dear Mr. Fowler: This letter is being sent in response to Mr. Annesley Ignatius, County of San Bernardino, Department of • Public Works letter dated January 8, 2013 ("County of San Bernardino Comment Letter") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), Planning Department, in reference to the above-entitled matter. Below are our responses to the County of San Bernardino Comment Letter: Water Resources Division (Grant Mann, P.E., Chief(909)387-8213 Count),ojSan Bernardino Comment Item: I. It is assumed that the local agencies will establish adequate provisions for intercepting and conducting accumulated drainage flows around or through the improvement sites in a manner that will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. Response to Comment I (prepared by MDS Consulting— Civil Engineer): A hydrology study for the Project was submitted to the City (and reviewed by the City) for the Project, which detailed how upstream tributary storm flows were intercepted and conveyed around and through the Project and connected to a public storm drain that the Project will construct within Wardman Bullock Road. The onsite Project storm flows are also collected and conveyed by surface and subsurface storm drain systems connected to the public storm drain in Wardman Bullock Road. Based upon such study, it is anticipated that downstream properties will not be affected in any way by the Project's storm drain systems; and in fact downstream properties will be protected by the proposed storm drain facilities. • D, E, F- 125 Mr. Steve Fowler City of Rancho Cucamonga—Planning Department January 16, 2013 Page 2 County of San Bernardino Comment Item: 2. If any encroachment is anticipated on San Bernardino County Flood Control District (District) right of Way, a permit must be obtained from the District's Permits/Operations Support Division. Response to Comment 2: The Project does not require any encroachments on San Bernardino County Flood Control District property. However, if it becomes necessary through the development process for the Project, the developer will obtain the proper permits from the District's Permits/Operations Support Division. Environmental Management Division (Brandi,Wood Ecological Resource Specialist(909)387- 7971 • County of San Bernardino Comment Item: 1. The proposed Project is located within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus)(SBKR). SBKR is a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. We appreciate the email communication with Dr. Michael O'Farrell regarding the suitability of the Project site for SBKR; however during protocol trapping sessions the species was trapped within 0.5 mile of the Project area in an area parallel to the Project location with similar habitat in 2011. Additionally, the proposed Project is adjacent to proposed mitigation lands established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. Consultation with the USFWS is required anytime a proposed action is likely to affect any listed species(Endangered Species Act, Section 10(a)(1) (B). To ensure during Project related activities there are no impacts to SBKR, consultation with USFWS is needed. Response to Comment 1 (prepared btu PCR Services Corporation, Biological Consultant): It is acknowledged that the Project site is located in the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated critical habitat area for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), SBKR. The comment does not specify where and under what circumstances the 2011 trapping of a specimen of the SBKR occurred. The County does not specify the location and precise proximity to the Project site of the referenced proposed mitigation lands for SBKR and the California Gnatcatcher. In context to the information in the Initial Study and in the January 25, 2012 Biological Constraints Analysis (BCA) prepared by PCR Services Corporation, the Initial Study misrepresented the on-site vegetation, although it is correctly reflected in the Biology Mitigation Measure 1. As is reported in the BCA, there is no Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, a vegetation type characterized by open to sparse shrubs dominated by scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamation), found on the Project site. The vegetation • D, E, F- 126 Mr. Steve Fowler City of Rancho Cucamonga — Planning Department January 16, 2013 Page 3 occurring on the Project site is Riversidean Sage Scrub, a more dense cover habitat dominated by white sage (Salvia apiana) and California Sagebrush (Artemisia californica), This latter vegetation type is marginally suitable habitat for SBKR, which is reflected in the professional opinion of Dr. Michael O'Farrell based on his many years of trapping experience in the Project vicinity. Additionally, the on-site vegetation is immediately adjacent to existing residential land uses and half of the Project site is disturbed from both past and existing uses represented by the five single-family residences on the Project site. Similar to the absence results for the protocol survey for California Gnatcatcher, whose preferred habitat does occur on-site, there is a relatively small likelihood of discovering SBKR on the Project site. In addition to the lack of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub occurring on the Project site, the on-site soils are not appropriate. SBKR Bemardino kangaroo rat is adapted to breeding in flood deposited alluvial materials in sandy soils mixed with boulders and cobbles, which is not present on the Project site. The on-site soils are granitic derived and coarse and rocky. County of San Bernardino Comment Item: 2 Page 14 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), section b states "a Riversidean • Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub plant community covers approximately 6.4 acres ... has been fragmented from the wildlife corridor by the construction of the flood control basin to the west." We disagree and point out that the flood control basin construction and mitigation lands were built and established to maintain the continuity of the habitat. Approximately ISO acres are preserved north of the basin and 170 acres to the south, both of these areas are adjacent and potentially impacted by the proposed Project. Impacts to the mitigation lands adjacent to the proposed Project site have not been thoroughly addressed. Response to Comment 2 (prepared by PCR Services Corporation, Biological Consultant): We appreciate the differing opinion of the County's Ecological Resource Specialist in regard to habitat quality on the Project site. However, we are of the opinion that the undeveloped properties surrounding the Project site and east of the flood control basin are fragmented from the greater wildlife habitat areas north of the flood control basin leading to the National Forest areas of the San Gabriel Mountains. This is further demonstrated by the Brentwood residential community immediately adjacent on the east of the Project site, for which there is no habitat connectivity. The Project site is on the periphery of both the residential land uses and the flood control basin uses. It is acknowledged the Project site has the ability to support wildlife. The past disturbances and the urban interface limit the Project site as a long-tetra viable wildlife resource. The incremental extension of the Project site for residential uses adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods is not considered to be a significant impact, which is supported by the results of the sensitive species surveys conducted by PCR in the spring of 2012 and no sensitive species were found, with the except of the CNPS Rank 4 species, Plummer's mariposa lily (Colochortus plummerae), for which mitigation is provided in Biology Mitigation Measure 2. • D,E, F- 127 Mr. Steve Fowler City of Rancho Cucamonga—Planning Department January 16. 2013 Page 4 County of San Bernardino Comment item: 3. Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub and Chamise chaparral, on-site vegetation types. are adapted and require the natural fire regime present in southern California. Furthennore, the proposed Project site is located adjacent to District land, set aside as mitigation established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. This land is covered with fire adapted vegetation and was not established to be modified for adjacent residential development. The MND does not identify the location of the required fire break required by City of Rancho Cucamonga, nor does it address the impacts of the establishment and maintenance of the fire/fuel break to ensure the safety of the community and how it will impact the adjacent habitat conservation land. This identification and impact analysis would be required in a complete CEQA analysis. Response to Comment 3 (prepared by PCR Services Corporation, Biological Consultant): 11 is not clear from where the reference to chamise chaparral originates. Neither the Initial Study nor the • BCA prepared by PCR identifies chamise chaparral as occurring on the Project site. As discussed above in Response I, the Initial Study did indicate that Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub(RAFSS) occurs on the Project site, but this was a misreading of the BCA, which correctly states the on-site vegetation to be Riversidean Sage Scrub or a disturbed form of this vegetation type. RAFSS does not occur on the Project site. The Project prepared a Fire Protection Plan and processed this plan through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Fire Protection Plan required no fire breaks or fuel modification zones on San Bernardino County Flood District properties. Adequate onsite fuel modification zones together with other fire protection construction eliminated the need for any fuel modification zones on SBCFD Properties. The required fire protection is provided by the construction of an eight-feet high fire wall constructed around the periphery of the residential lots. The fire wall will be accompanied with solid fire proof gates. This Project feature is depicted on the Tentative Tract Map, Preliminary Site Plan prepared by MDS Consulting. As such, no fuel modification will be necessary or impact off-site resources. Coum),of San Bernardino Comment Item: 4. Page 32, Section 10 c of the MND states .. . "According to the General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the Project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources: therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the Project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan." The Project area is within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. Furthermore, Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, the vegetation present on-site is considered to be a sensitive plant community identified by the California • D, E, F- 128 Mr. Steve Fowler City of Rancho Cucamonga—Planning Department January 16, 2013 Page 5 Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Consultation with both agencies (USFIA'S and CDFW) is needed to address impacts to these sensitive biological resources. Response to Comment 4(prepared by PCR Services Corporation, Biological Consultant): As stated above in Response 1, it is acknowledged that the Project site is located in the US Fish and - Wildlife Service designated critical habitat area for the SBKR. Also stated in Responses I and 3, Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub does not occur on the Project site and the Initial Study is being corrected to reflect the on-site vegetation to be Riversidean Sage Scrub, as is reported in the Project BCA. The City has required with Biology Mitigation Measure I the replacement of habitat for the loss of the 6.4 acres of Riversidean Sage Scrub. The results of the sensitive species surveys conducted by PCR in the spring of 2012 confirm the conclusions of the General Plan that sensitive biological resources are not present, with the exception of Plummer's mariposa lily, as stated above in Response 2 and for which Biology Mitigation Measure 2 appropriately addresses the Project impacts. I believe the above information has addressed each of the comments made in the County of San • Bernardino Comment Letter. If you have any further comments and/or questions, please feel free to give me a call at (8 18)653-6157. Thank you. Best regards, Jonathan Curtis. as Receiver cc: Stan Morse(MDS Consulting) Beth Martinez(PCR Services Corporation) Brenda Vargas • D, E, F- 129 Memorandum %nzw- To: Brenda Vargas DATE: January 16, 2013 cc: Beth Jolie Martinez FROM: Daryl KOUtnik RE: RESPONSES TO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JANUARY 8,2013 COMMENT LETTER PCR has reviewed the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District comment letter of 8 January 2013 submitted in regard to the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 18823. Below are our responses to the comments provided by the Environmental Management Division. For ease of review,we have preceded each response with the County's comment. Comment 1 The proposed project is located within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami • parvus)(SBKR). SBKR is a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. We appreciate the email communication with Dr. Michael O'Farrell regarding the suitability of the project site for SBKR; however during protocol trapping sessions the species was trapped within 0.5 mile of the project area in an area parallel to the project location with similar habitat in 2011. Additionally, the proposed project is adjacent to proposed mitigation lands established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. Consultation with the USFWS is required anytime a proposed action is likely to affect any listed species (Endangered Species Act, Section 10(a) (1) (B). To ensure during project related activities there are no impacts to SBKR,consultation with USFWS is needed. Response 1 The City acknowledges the project site being located in the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated critical habitat area for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), SBKR. The comment does not specify where and under what circumstances the 2011 trapping of a specimen of the SBKR occurred. The County does not specify the location and precise proximity to the project site of the referenced proposed mitigation lands for SBKR and the California gnatcatcher. In context to the information in the Initial Study and in the January 25, 2012 Biological Constraints Analysis (BCA) prepared by PCR Services Corporation, the Initial Study misrepresented the on-site vegetation, although it is correctly reflected in the Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 1. As is reported in the BCA, there is no Riversidean Alluvial • One Venture, Suite 150, Irvine, California 92618 INTERNET www.pernet.com TEL 949.753.7001 FAX 949.753.7002 D, E,F- 130 IL Memorandum . . RE: RESPONSES TO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JANUARY S,2013 COMMENT LETTER Fan Sage Scrub, a vegetation type characterized by open to sparse shrubs dominated by scalebroom (Lepidospartum squomatum), found on the project site. The vegetation occurring on the project site is Riversidean Sage Scrub, a more dense cover habitat dominated by white sage (Salvia apiona) and California sagebrush (Artemisia californica). This latter vegetation type is marginally suitable habitat for SBKR, which is reflected in the professional opinion of Dr. Michael O'Farrell based on his many years of trapping experience in the project vicinity. Additionally, the on-site vegetation is immediately adjacent to existing residential land uses and half of the project site is disturbed from both past and existing uses represented by the five single-family residences on the project site. Similar to the absence results for the protocol survey for California gnatcatcher, whose preferred habitat does occur on-site, there is a relatively small likelihood of discovering SBKR on the project site. In addition to the lack of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub occurring on the project site, the on-site soils are not appropriate. SBKR Bernardino kangaroo rat is adapted to breeding in flood deposited alluvial materials in sandy soils mixed with boulders and cobbles, which is not present on the project site.The on-site soils are granitic derived and coarse and rocky. Comment 2 • Page 14 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), section b states "a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub plant community covers approximately 6.4 acres ... has been fragmented from the wildlife corridor by the construction of the flood control basin to the west." We disagree and point out that the flood control basin construction and mitigation lands were built and established to maintain the continuity of the habitat. Approximately 150 acres are preserved north of the basin and 170 acres to the south, both of these areas are adjacent and potentially impacted by the proposed project. Impacts to the mitigation lands adjacent to the proposed project site have not been thoroughly addressed. Response 2 The City appreciates the differing opinion of the County's Ecological Resource Specialist in regard to habitat quality on the project site. However, the City is of the opinion that the undeveloped properties surrounding the project site and east of the flood control basin are fragmented from the greater wildlife habitat areas north of the flood control basin leading to the National Forest areas of the San Gabriel Mountains. This is further demonstrated by the Brentwood residential community immediately adjacent on the east of the project site, for which there is no habitat connectivity. The project site is on the periphery of both the residential land uses and the flood control basin uses. It is acknowledged the project site has the ability to support wildlife; the past disturbances and the urban interface limit the project site as a long-term viable wildlife resource. The incremental extension of the project site for • PCR Services Corporation Page 2 January 16, 2013 D, E, F- 131 Memorandum Y RE: RESPONSES TO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JANUARY 8,2013 COMMENT LETTER residential uses adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods is not considered to be a significant impact,which is supported by the results of the sensitive species surveys conducted by PCR in the spring of 2012 and no sensitive species were found, with the except of the CNPS Rank 4 species, Plummer's mariposa lily (Calochortus plummerae), for which mitigation is provided in Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 2. Comment 3 Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub and Chamise chaparral, on-site vegetation types, are adapted and require the natural fire regime present in southern California. Furthermore, the proposed project site is located adjacent to District land, set aside as mitigation established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. This land is covered with fire adapted vegetation and was not established to be modified for adjacent residential development. The MND does not identify the location of the required fire break required by City of Rancho Cucamonga, nor does it address the impacts of the establishment and maintenance of the fire/fuel break to ensure the safety of the community and how it will impact the adjacent • habitat conservation land. This identification and impact analysis would be required in a complete CEQA analysis. Response 3 It is not clear from where the reference to chamise chaparral originates. Neither the Initial Study nor the BCA prepared by PCR identifies chamise chaparral as occurring on the project site. As discussed above in Response 1, the Initial Study did indicate that Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) occurs on the project site, but this was a misreading of the BCA, which correctly states the on-site vegetation to be Riversidean Sage Scrub or a disturbed form of this vegetation type. RAFSS does not occur on the project site. The project prepared a Fire Protection Plan and processed this plan through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Fire Protection Plan required no fire breaks or fuel modification zones on San Bernardino County Flood District properties. Adequate onsite fuel modification zones together with other fire protection construction eliminated the need for any fuel modification zones on SBCFD properties. The required fire protection is provided by the construction of an eight-foot high fire wall constructed around the periphery of the residential lots. The fire wall will be accompanied with solid proof fire gates. This project feature is depicted on the Tentative Tract Map, Preliminary Site Plan prepared by MDS Consulting. As such, no fuel modification will be necessary or impact off-site resources. • PCR Services Corporation Page 3 January 16, 2013 D, E,F- 132 Memorandum RE: RESPONSES TO COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO JANUARY 8,2013 COMMENT LETTER Comment 4 Page 32, Section 10 c of the MND states.... "According to the General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan." The project area is within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. Furthermore, Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, the vegetation present on-site is considered to be a sensitive plant community identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Consultation with both agencies (USFWS and CDFW) is needed to address impacts to these sensitive biological resources. Response 4 As stated above in Response 1, the City acknowledges the project site being located in • the US Fish and Wildlife Service designated critical habitat area for the SBKR. Also stated in Responses 1 and 3, Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub does not occur on the project site and the Initial Study is being corrected to reflect the on-site vegetation to be Riversidean Sage Scrub, as is reported in the project BCA. The City has required with Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 1 the replacement of habitat for the loss of the 6.4 acres of Riversidean Sage Scrub. The results of the sensitive species surveys conducted by PCR in the spring of 2012 confirm the conclusions of the General Plan that sensitive biological resources are not present, with the exception of Plummer's mariposa lily, as stated above in Response 2 and for which Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 2 appropriately addresses the project impacts. • PCR Services Corporation Page 4 January 16, 2013 D, E, F- 133 RESOLUTION NO.13-07 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. SUBTT18823, A 19 LOT SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 12.93 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD SOUTH AND WEST OF BLUE SKY COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0226-081-15 16 AND 17. A. Recitals. 1. Mr. Jonathan Curtis, legal receiver forthe property,filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 18823, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as 'the application." 2. On the 9th day of January 2013 and continued to January 23, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 9, and January 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and west of Blue Sky Court with a street frontage of approximately 778 feet and lot depth of approximately 633 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant flood control property and three single-family residences, the property to the south is vacant land, the property to the east across Wardman Bullock Road consists of existing single-family residences, and the property to the west is the flood control basin; and C. The proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and • d. All lots of the proposed subdivision meet the 20,000 square foot area minimum; and D, E, F- 134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 2 • e. The project includes the concurrent submittal of a Variance to reduce the lot depth on Lot 9 to 124 feet from the required 150 feet, and a Minor Exception to increase the heights of the rear yard walls by up to 2 feet, 8 inches (2'-8") of retaining wall on Lots 9 and 10 and to increase the height of the north perimeter wall on Lot 1 to 8 feet, zero inches (8'-0") in order to comply with the Fire Protection Plan, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans as it meets the 25,000 square foot minimum average requirement for lot size in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan with the average lot being 25,722 square feet. Further, the project incorporates themed architectural walls that are required in the same specific plan; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans as the application incorporates equestrian trails and landscape improvements around the project site to meet the City requirements, and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed as it provides access for ingress and egress into the site and the lot dimensions and sizes are consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental • damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat as potential environmental impacts have been analyzed and addressed in the Mitigated Negative declaration prepared for this document; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems as it is constant with uses in the area and is consistent with the General Plan; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and.the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. D, E,F- 135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 3 • b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such,Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The subdivision will be developed in accordance with the plans on-file in the Planning Department, as approved by the Planning Commission. 2) A reciprocal access easement for access onto the trail to the south of the Tentative Tract Map shall be obtained from the owners of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3) All retaining walls visible to public view shall be decorative and adhere to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Neighborhood Theme design requirements. 4) Provide a 5-foot minimum landscape area between the back of the sidewalk and 6-foot block wall on all corner lots. 5) Future house product for the subdivision shall adhere to the architectural requirements and guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that • will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. D,E,F- 136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 4 • 7) Applicant and/ or property owner, prior to recordation of the map must obtain an approval from the Fire Construction Services Department of the Fire Protection Plan, or shall maintain defensible space as outlined in Government Code Sections 51175 -51189, including but not limited to the requirement of a 100-foot fuel modification buffer from the north,west and south property lines that are adjacent to vacant land. The buffer requirement may be satisfied through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the owner or owners of the adjacent vacant land. No such MOU is required if the adjacent land is developed prior to recordation of the final map. Engineering Department 1) Wardman Bullock Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, street trees, drive approaches and sidewalk as required. b) Provide 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. d) Post R26 "No Parking" signs on Wardman Bullock Road from Blue Sky Court to south project limit. 2) All lettered private streets frontage improvements to be in accordance with • City "Local Street", as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, street trees, sidewalk and drive approaches, as required. b) Provide 5800 lumens HPSV street lights. c) Provide traffic striping and signage as required. 3) Proposed Gated Entrances on Wardman Bullock Road are to be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 4) Tract 16324, at the north end of Wardman Bullock Road has been conditioned to complete the westerly portion of Wardman Bullock all the way to Wilson Avenue. If the Wardman Bullock frontage is constructed by others, this developer will be required to pay his fair share of the reimbursement agreement. 5) Public storm drain in Wardman Bullock Road shall be installed per a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer. Provide a catch basin north of the most northerly private street and cross gutters across both cul- de-sacs. Grading 1) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to • constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a D, E, F- 137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 5 • letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 2) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit: The applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan" for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3) In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Water Trail Slope Bar Interval Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50-feet 6% to 8.99% 40-feet 9% to 1 1.99% 30-feet • 12% and greater 20-feet 4) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall provide a soils report with percolation recommendations for the proposed infiltration trenches to the Building and Safety Services Director or his designee. 5) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). This number shall be shown on the cover sheet of all permitted grading plans. 6) A grading bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 7) A storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's"Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by MDS Consulting, dated June 18, 2012, is deemed "Approved." The WQMP will need to be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. • D,E,F- 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 6 • Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) During project construction, construction equipment shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established bythe City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of • construction. D,E, F- 139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 7 • • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Particulate Matter(PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 6.4 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management • entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank) at a minimum of equivalent to 6.4 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Sage Scrub prior D, E, F- 140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 8 • to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. 2) The project applicant shall prepare a Plummer's mariposa lily mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. The plan shall consist of transplantation or other methods of removal including "set aside' and transplantation at a receiver site(s), bulb collection or bulb augmentation within a greenhouse for future transplantation under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. The receiver site(s) shall be ecologically suitable and shall include the recordation of a conservation easement or deed restriction. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to • establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. 2) If any paleontological resource(i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect • or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further D,E, F- 141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 9 • mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. • Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing • agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. D,E, F- 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 10 • 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following, • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available • and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. D, E, F- 143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT1 8823 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 11 • • Design buildings to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. • Plant shade trees to maximize cooling benefits and not interfere with solar panel installations (generally within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties). • Construct single-family residential units to be able to easily convert to solar power (i.e., solar ready). Photovoltaic cells (solar panels) shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option. • The residential units shall utilize techniques to minimize energy • use and maximize ventilation to take advantage of sun/shade patterns and prevailing winds. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC),which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the • timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which D,E, F- 144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 12 • does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting, June 18, 2012 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for • review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of .a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage underthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise • mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. D,E, F- 145 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 • Page 13 Interior: 2) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is submitted, the applicant(current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman • ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner D,E,F- 146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-07 SUBTT18823 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 14 • I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D,E, F- 147 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'r., �M. STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT18823 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map APPLICANT: Jonathan C. Curtis LOCATION: West side of Wardman Bullock Road south of Blue Sky Court ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-07, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - 82,206.25 B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning • Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 1 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGC0MM12013 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 148 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or • masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 11. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians _I_/_ or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 12. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official 13. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local —I—I— Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. is 2 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D,E, F- 149 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 14. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. • 15. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6 foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split- face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 16, The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 17. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners'Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 18. All parkways,open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, • whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 20. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 21. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 3D days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 22. Construct block walls between homes(i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 23. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 24. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 25. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 150 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 26. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5- foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning • Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 27. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 28. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 29. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. D. Building Design 1. All dwellings shall have the front,.side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with • the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork,that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 3. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the _/_/_ street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All two-car garage parking spaces shall be a minimum 20 feet wide by 20 feet long interior dimensions free and clear. One-car Garages shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide by 20 feet long interior dimensions free and clear. 2. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. • 4 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 151 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion • control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water _/_/_ efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyerwritten notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D,E, F- 152 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 4. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final • occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards,such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 5 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CN EL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$ 557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, • FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan, C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT18823)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 6 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC0MM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 153 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program(CEEP)can contact _/_/_ the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e., subtt18823). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of occupancy for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract parcel map • recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 4. All structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and the 2010 California Residential Code (CRC). L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. • 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E,F- 154 Project No.SUB Tr18823 Completion Date 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer, 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be _/_/_ prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted)and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s)showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings, 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". • 8 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 155 Project No.SUBTi18823 Completion Date 18, Grading Inspections: • a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre- grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations,the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector', b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians(Building and Safety Front Counter)an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. _/—!— cate of ccupancy 19. Prior to te issuance of the functionality of the storm water quality management plain (WQMP)he ebe t mar of nagement gement p ard shall 'ctices (BMP) devices. include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 20. The Water Quality Management Plan shall _ • 21. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. M. Additional Requirements/Comments —Water Quality Management Plan . 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Oficial and _/—!— the City of Rancho Cucamonga's"Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 2. The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting dated June 18,2012 is deemed _/— complete. The WQMP will need to be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit: APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from --- street centerline): 33 total feet on Wardman Bullock Road — 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. — • 9 Res & Stf R I:\PLANN ING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 R t\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc p D,E, F- 156 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 3. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. O. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Wardman Bullock Road X X X X X X Interior Streets X X X X T X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be • provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer • 10 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E,F- 157 Project No.SUBTI'18823 Completion Date Notes. • 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets,fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below)and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement • plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Wardman Bullock 60% Geijera Australian Willow 5' 45' O.C. 15 Gal Road parviflora 30% Platanus London Plane Tree 7' 60' O.C. 15 Gal acerifolia "A" & "B" Streets SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST Provide Street FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA. LIST EACH STREET ASA SEPARATE LINE Names ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. • 11 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E,F- 158 Project No.SUBTT18823 Completion Date 7. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "all improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvements plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement • plans will govern. 8. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Wardman Rullock Road Beautification Master Plan. Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X' designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right- of-way. R. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground)in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval 12 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 159 Project No,SUBTT18823 Completion Date of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. • General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at(909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. V. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. W. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. X. Alarm Systems 1. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. • 13 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 160 Project No.SUBT718823 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING • CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 14 :\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC0MW2013 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18823Stand Conds 1-23.doc D, E, F- 161 • RESOLUTION NO.13-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2012-00135, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE LOT DEPTH FROM 150. FEET TO 124 FEET ON LOT 9 IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD SOUTH AND WEST OF BLUE SKY COURT;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0226-081-1516 AND 17. A. Recitals. 1. Mr. Jonathan Curtis, legal receiver forthe properly,filed an application forthe approval of Variance DRC2012-00135, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of January 2013, and continued to the 23rd day of January, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 9, 2013, and January 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and west of Blue Sky Court with a street frontage of approximately 778 feet and lot depth of approximately 633 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant flood control property and three single-family residences, the property to the south is vacant land, the property to the east across Wardman Bullock Road consists of existing single-family residences, and the property to the west is the flood control basin, and c. The proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the reduced lot depth of Lot 9 has similar measurement as adjacent lots in similar to ; and • d. The project includes the concurrent submittal of Minor Exception DRC2012-00135 to increase the wall heights on Lots 1, 9 and 10 to a maximum calculated height of 8 feet (8') and D, E, F- 162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-08 DRC2012-00135 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 2 • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, a subdivision of approximately 12.93 acres of land into 19 single-family residential lots. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code in that the Lot 9 meets the requirements of the Development Code for minimum lot area. The lot is oriented with the long side parallel to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street which makes the lot depth short of the required 150 feet by 26 feet. The current orientation was utilized to design the tract around an existing single-family residence constructed north of the proposed lot, the south boundary and still meet the requirements for the private street. The lot will still be able to provide all the amenities that the other lots in the area contain but will be oriented differently. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district as Lot 9 is designed to meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code but it is oriented opposite of the lots to the north and west. The lot is oriented with the long side parallel to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street which makes the lot depth short of the required 150 feet by 26 feet. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would • deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district as the applicant can meet the spirit of the code by providing a lot that has similar measurement as adjacent lots. With the exception of the minimum lot depth requirement, the proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision provides for the development of homes that will be architecturally compatible with surrounding properties, and provide the potential for equestrian use consistent with surrounding properties. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot sizes and depths achievable within the constraints of the property and the minimum lot depth has been achieved on all lots except Lot 9, and strict interpretation and enforcement of the minimum lot depth requirement would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the district. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district as the applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot depths achievable within the constraints of the property and creates an equestrian community compatible with adjacent developments. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the district because the configuration of the proposed subdivision is compatible with Lot 10 within the proposed subdivision. The lot will also have to meet all the setback and height requirements of the district. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as it will only reduce the lot depth and all other Development Code requirements will still have to be adhered to. • D,E,F- 163 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-08 DRC2012-00135 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 • Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-07 approving Tentative Tract Map 18823, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. ,- b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and the Mitigation Measures provided for Tentative Tract Map 18823. Planning Department 1) Approval of Variance DRC2012-00135 is for the reduction of the lot depth from 150 feet to 124 feet on Lot 9 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823. 2) Approval of the Variance is contingent on the approval of Tentative • Tract Map 18823 by the Planning Commission. 0, E, F- 164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-08 DRC2012-00135 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 4 • 3) The subdivision will be developed in accordance with the plans on-file in the Planning Department, as approved by the Planning Commission. 4) Future house product for the subdivision shall adhere to the architectural requirements and guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers. or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6) Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building • permit issuance. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: • D, E, F- 165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-08 DRC2012-00135 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 5 • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D,E, F- 166 RESOLUTION NO.13-09 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE BOUNDARY WALL HEIGHTS ON LOTS 1, 9, AND 10 IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD SOUTH AND WEST OF BLUE SKY COURT;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0226-081-15 16 AND 17, A. Recitals. 1. Jonathan Curtis, legal receiver for the property, filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2012-00513, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of January 2013, and continued to the 23rd day of January 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 9, and January 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and west of Blue Sky Court with a street frontage of approximately 778 feet and lot depth of approximately 633 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant flood control property and three single-family residences, the property to the south is vacant land, the property to the east across Wardman Bullock Road consists of existing single-family residences, and the property to the west is the flood control basin; and C. The proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the increase in the height of the wall to 8 feet is required for Lot 1 to meet the requirements of the fire protection plan and to increase the heights of the rear yard walls by • adding up to 2 feet, 8 inches (2'-8") of retaining wall on Lots 9 and 10 for privacy; and D, E, F- 167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-09 • MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 - JONATHAN c. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 2 d. The project includes the concurrent submittal of a Variance to reduce the lot depth on Lot 9 to 124 feet from the required 150 feet and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, a subdivision of approximately 12.93 acres of land into 19 single-family residential lots, and e. The walls on Lots 9 and 10 are necessary to ensure an adequate level of privacy and to compensate for the finished grade differences between the applicant's property and the equestrian trail between the wall and the southern property lines. The increase of the wall height on Lot 1 is to meet the requirement of the Fire Protection Plan that requires the north wall to be increased to 8 feet tall. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is of sufficient size and is designed so as to provide a desirable environment within its own boundaries. Increasing the wall height by two feet will provide better fire protection on Lot 1, and increasing the height on Lots 9 and 10 with a retaining wall 2 feet 8 inches (2' - 8") (calculated height of 1-foot, 4 inches) will maintain privacy along the southern lot lines. b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in • the surrounding area as the applicant is proposing a residential development as part of this application and there are residential developments to the north and east of the project with a proposed residential tract proposed to the south. This application will allow for the privacy and protection of the future residents. C. Any exceptions to or deviation from the density, requirements, or design standards result in the creation of project amenities that would not be available through strict adherence to Code provisions (e.g., additional open space, protection of natural resources, improved pedestrian connectivity, public plazas). The Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege or amenity not available to other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow a wall to provide fire protection for Lot 1 and a 6 foot tall privacy wall for Lots 9 and 10, with the addition of the retaining wall. These are amenities parcels in the area also enjoy. d. That the granting of the Minor exception will not adversely affect the interest of the public or the interest of the residents and property owners in the vicinity of the premises in question as the increased heights will be located along the tract boundary and will architecturally the existing walls in the area. e. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in that it helps encourage new development by allowing the applicant to provide privacy and fire protection to the specified lots that is enjoyed by the other lots in the area. f. The Minor Exception is the minimum required in that it allows the specified • improvement to occur, but does not provide additional development rights. The granting of the Minor Exception does not provide a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties D, E, F- 168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-09 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 3 • classified in the same district as all properties are shall meet the minimum fire protection allowed by a particular plan and be allowed to have the same level of privacy as other residential lots. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-07 approving Tentative Tract Map 18823, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds • that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and the Mitigation Measures provided for Tentative Tract Map 18823. Planning Department 1) Approval of this resolution is for the increase of wall height to 8 feet(8') on the north property line of Lot 1 of Tentative Tract Map • SUBTT18823, and the increase in the height of the south perimeter D, E,f- 169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-09 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 — JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 Page 4 • walls on Lots 9 and 10 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 by a maximum of 2 feet 8 inches (2' - 8") for the retaining walls. 2) The approval of this application is contingent on the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823. 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4) Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 5) The applicant shall comply with all applicable codes and obtain the necessary building permits from the Building and Safety Department. 6) All retaining walls visible to public view shall be decorative and adhere • to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Neighborhood Theme design requirements. 7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner • D, E, F- 170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-09 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2012-00513 —JONATHAN C. CURTIS January 23, 2013 • Page 5 I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D,E,F- 171 R -HID RNCA ALIPOINIA Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 Variance DRC2012-00135 1 Agenda ALSMQWA • History • Zoning • Site Utilization y • Tract Map • Minor Exception • Variance • Recommendation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APHOECD..-73 1 � SBF.0➢. � �- • 1 1 � 4 1 , 7PMN0 i ? Pilp - .IAP NA , APH0226-WOR s L SHA.FCD. f h TVy NOr/ f3? , APR 0126-011-07 I ri l } aMR -A9BSBCFCD / r APR 0226-081-%/0S TTM NO,19741 1 � k. r � 1 Zoning RAWW YALiBD➢,41n • Very Low Residential • Etiwanda North Specific Plan • Etiwanda Highlands themed neiqhborhood 1 Standard Requirements "AhOWAIKINIA • 25 , 000 Square Foot Minimum Net Average Lot Size • 20 , 000 Square Foot Minimum Net Lot Size • 150 foot Minimum Depth • 90 foot Minimum Width , 100 foot Minimum width at corners hOAO It ut Ir-r-� !�Z'�- R - -- \ �\\�ya%Y'i �/I 1 d 1 ---------------- ' -- aaebmnrManw 1 ------� —r-- -- -- ---- —I 1 j 1 i I I 11 I 1 au€ as _--'\� 1 u ii of % � I I � I II �- m mo A 1 1 1 _ 11 l Ii y I oil I 4-0F 7 --- --�--�- 1- ? '•. 1 1 11I ,���1 I 1 1 ____________ ...... ....J...........uY{-----�.--J--J_-J--. I Tam d7 IGp99A NN �� Npl Wiv I o , gl g• .. �g� ilis,'g�; li II ;g ��€3 rsa � lit - - - - - --r� $LI J i i oil I • F � 33�gf bi jY� i Www Minor Exception • Increase height of fences on Lots 1 , 9 & 10 • Lot 1 increase height of north wall to 8 feet for the Fire Protection Plan Requirement • Lots 9 & 10 add a retaining wall to a maximum height of 2 '-8" below the 6'-0" garden wall for privacy. • Calculated height of retaining wall is 1 '-4" Variance XWA UilNm • Reduce the lot depth for Lot 9 by 26 feet to allow Lot 9 to have a 124 foot lot depth . s Environmental Assessment CPAP' Uj • A letter was received from San Bernardino County Department of Public Works on January 9th , expressing concerns about drainage and biological resources . • To allow time for the applicants to prepare a response , staff requested a continuance of the public hearing to the January 23rd meeting date . • The applicant's environmental consultants have responded and determined that no further mitigation is needed . Recommendation PU= • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 with conditions • Approve Minor Exception •.i D RC2012-00513 - Approve Variance s D RC2012-00135 n ` STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 23, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX HOMES -A residential subdivision of 53 single-family lots on 40.12 acres of land within the Very Low Residential district of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest comer of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0226-081-05 and 06. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from January 9, 2013. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 18741 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 1.4 dwelling units per acre • B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda North Specific Plan) South - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda Specific Plan) East - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan) West - Flood Control Basin; Flood Control C. General Plan Designations: Project Site: Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor D. Site Characteristics: The project site is two rectangular-shaped parcels totaling 40.12 acres of land within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant's proposal includes the subdivision of 53 lots with 51 lots being proposed as single-family residential lots, and two lots proposed as basins for water quality purposes. The parcels are vacant and located on the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. To the north of the project, is a partially-built subdivision of single-family residences; to the south and to the east across Wardman Bullock Road, are existing single-family residences; and to the west is the flood control basin. • Item G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTf18741 — CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2012 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Within this themed area, the applicant is required to construct walls and entry points that correspond with the other walls and entry points in the surrounding area. The community wall along the perimeter of the site along Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue will consist of a stucco covered block wall with pilasters wrapped in brick veneer spaced every 40 to 60 feet. Both the wall and pilasters will contain concrete caps. The northwest corner of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue will include a monument sign that will be wrapped in brick veneer and will identify the neighborhood area. Access into the housing tract will be accomplished at two points: One point will be off of Wardman Bullock Road and the other will be off of Wilson Avenue. Both points will include Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood entry portals. The proposed subdivision consists of 51 numbered lots to be utilized for future housing product and two lettered lots to be utilized as basins for water quality purposes. The applicant is not proposing housing product at this time but has commented that it will be submitted in the near future. The lots in the tract will average approximately 25,000 square feet. The lot sizes range from 20,000 square feet to approximately 40,000 square feet. These parcels will be equestrian lots and will allocate pads at the rear of the yards for either 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral space. The lots meet the required average width of 90 feet and a minimum depth of 150 feet. These equestrian lots have 15-foot wide local trails at the rear of the lots; however, the trails • along the west and north tract boundary are proposed to be 21 feet wide for trail and emergency access. The west and north sides of the trail will have three rail PVC trail fence and the rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. Trails along Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road will be 15 feet wide with three rail PVC trail fence along the street sides of the trail. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with the recommendation that they work with the property to the north for an access agreement. C. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Review Committee reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and had several corrections for the applicant to make and requested that they correct the items and return to the Grading Review Committee. On September 18, 2012, the project returned to the Grading Review Committee and still had a two more corrections. The applicant was required to make corrections and resubmit. On November 6, 2012, the Grading Review Committee reviewed and approved the project to move forward to Planning Commission. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 13, 2012, at • Summit Intermediate School, which was attended by approximately 14 community members. G-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18741 — CENTEX HOMES • January 23, 2012 Page 3 The major issue raised was the increased traffic in the area with the additional houses. The applicant responded by stating that Wilson Avenue will soon be constructed and this improvement will alleviate the traffic. The streets around the area were designed and constructed to accommodate the proposed traffic. F. Mitigated Negative Declaration Letter and Response: On January 9, 2013 prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received a comment letter from the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works. The letter expressed concerns regarding drainage and biological issues. Staff asked that the hearing of January 9 be continued to the following meeting date (January 23, 2013) to allow time for the applicant's consultant and biologist to prepare an adequate response. A response letter has been attached to the report for Planning Commission's review. The response letter addresses the concerns and indicated no new impacts were identified; therefore no new analysis or mitigation measures were required. G. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, the City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the • public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660400t radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, effre loom Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development JAB:SF/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 9, 2013 Exhibit B - Letter from the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works dated January 8, 2013 Exhibit C - Letter of Response from Stephen Ford of RAMAC dated January 16, 2013 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 • G-3 STAFF REPORT - • PL,N'NING DEPARTMENT DATE: January9, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission cUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX HOMES - A residential subdivision of 53 single-family lots on 40.12 acres of land within the Very Low Residential district of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest comer of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 0226-081-05 and 06. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 18741 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 1.4 dwelling units per acre • B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda North Specific Plan) South - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda Specific Plan) East - Single-Family Residences; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (Etiwanda Highlands Specific Plan) West - Flood Control Basin; Flood Control C. General Plan Designations: Project Site: Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor D. Site Characteristics: The project site is two rectangular-shaped parcels totaling 40.12 acres of land within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicant's proposal includes the subdivision of 53 lots with 51 lots being proposed as single-family residential lots, and two lots proposed as basins for water quality purposes. The parcels are vacant and located on the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. To the north of the project, is a partially-built subdivision of single-family residences; to the south and to the east across Wardman Bullock Road, are existing single-family residences; and to the west is the flood control basin. • EXHIBIT A G-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18741 — CENTEX HOMES January 9, 2012 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site is located within the Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Within this themed area, the applicant is required to construct walls and entry points that correspond with the other walls and entry points in the surrounding area. The community wall along the perimeter of the site along Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue will consist of a stucco covered block wall with pilasters wrapped in brick veneer spaced every 40 to 60 feet. Both the wall and pilasters will contain concrete caps. The northwest corner of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue will include a monument sign that will be wrapped in brick veneer and will identify the neighborhood area. Access into the housing tract will be accomplished at two points: One point will be off of Wardman Bullock Road and the other will be off of Wilson Avenue. Both points will include Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood entry portals. The proposed subdivision consists of 51 numbered lots to be utilized for future housing product and two lettered lots to be utilized as basins for water quality purposes. The applicant is not proposing housing product at this time but has commented that it will be submitted in the near future. The lots in the tract will average approximately 25,000 square feet. The lot sizes range from 20,000 square feet to approximately 40,000 square feet. These parcels will be equestrian lots and will allocate pads at the rear of the yards for either 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral space. The lots meet the required average width of 90 feet and a minimum depth of 150 feet. These equestrian lots have 15-foot wide local trails at the rear of the lots; however, the trails • along the west and north tract boundary are proposed to be 21 feet wide for trail and emergency access. The west and north sides of the trail will have three rail PVC trail fence and the rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. Trails along Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road will be 15 feet wide with three rail PVC trail fence along the street sides of the trail. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with the recommendation that they work with the property to the north for an access agreement. C. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Review Committee reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and had several corrections for the applicant to make and requested that they correct the items and return to the Grading Review Committee. On September 18, 2012, the project returned to the Grading Review Committee and still had a two more corrections. The applicant was required to make corrections and resubmit. On November 6, 2012, the Grading Review Committee reviewed and approved the project to move forward to Planning Commission. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 13, 2012, at • Summit Intermediate School, which was attended by approximately 14 community members. G-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18741 — CENTEX HOMES January 9, 2012 • Page 3 The major issue raised was the increased traffic in the area with the additional houses. The applicant responded by stating that Wilson Avenue will soon be constructed and this improvement will alleviate the traffic. The streets around the area were designed and constructed to accommodate the proposed traffic. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, the City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. • Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey A. loom Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development JAB:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Grading Plan Exhibit D - Cut and Fill Plan Exhibit E - Fire Access Plan Exhibit F - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit G - Initial Studies I and II (additional studies available on request) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 • G-6 1 ' i x � ti t R alp Kwa -Cam `h ♦� Y PJ Yg! S• E 1 1 m °�._ v0 S r atm ®. • .4 ® .\ ® ° ® V..\ �i° Og lil 1 I CL All 71 J_ 1_ L 1 • 1-- - ----------------------- •• ••• -�� area m.n vion �_ ilk 4 I VV I 9 _r+ I I gl s I I I I I I � I I � I � I �c199 I EXHIBIT B - - - - - - - - G-8 - - - --8 0 m al 17X i ;v I I _ 2 • �.wl.vmow. 1 :.s Iii R) --- ---- - -- �--'--- --d-- TO SHM INDEX, IT �. •' i ., �� " Inli - —' '. Tar e t-- sr�r s mE MO � m a SEE 25ENENT NOTES Vim`^mom' n m O NOTE IT 'I it Q o H &€tT 41 TO m �I ImL1Y PORYF1'ORS LOT 1 �, Q ama,Rm mwc,m I11w iw rta,a) „ y i a Ill a, Y I a'nV a mm MI nr ani� ® "n wl N ul I Ir__ 14 IO,. I _ .,..,.m.. 4 OWNMIAPPi I T. (:OT NN ^" ENGINIR.. Fu K)RN QUMTI TO F mlu.lam par)��-nn STENFORYATAiIOOM ,.�P,rl a.aYa rtM-Am -wnaar.ww l BfNGIY�B6 8145 OF BCVXHG +1 OEew,plpll� `a m;w AEI LJLT5UBTT1674I TB1TamE TRACT MAP NO 1B7M _.mw> . awm,m .wm w -__ m�0_ gggq++++ ryryN�j�/aVMpb": cavrvaLtnaoNo�w 3 PfV1910N9 na'.vu..� ian.•p'iu.m �r l�I __ _- ill• .. I :� fir PG'.'i 693 PE N 16 b�9 E- 4�E .H •61.7 1 P[/ 4 _ .47 9 1 659 PE TL]PE o m= � Iii II III, 1J � � � / � iml• /N�A��r oral 81 � '� I '� 'S k�l. `S 1>. n L "Sm N wor•w..m,m m��. 52 $3 BASIN fio e'X X63 .. µ 4r�i i i0.1 i xoum.er , r,,;: j 1 WAPUMAN e --B 'S 1 16.33. ems. ,r ••. comm Ll .. LOT B F1Crx�- ,, :4p, 1 1 39 j 32 37 I �5, 1 42 di d I 1 1 I40 TItACI Id759-I� mLT 13555-1 ALB. 213/6I-A W.B. 3 32-d31 II i1�Q1i11; 4 L'c! _J 1 1 1114 'ii , Y I\ 1 I SECWNV-V I I 1p III�� I I 1 I I I I 1 $ 1 nIM1 rvpl.l c OEYANO ,vr SELbON X-X SELPON Y-Y cEfi ON Z-Z f _ SECnON E-E Icor K.m.rax um a.,,n m.w.a x'rmma.y n...r..":lw .wn, .,IXwrt mac cw[' m a" yym,� lzw uxrry,V[0 SS i PICAI IOCZI WREEi X11 M8741 ��� m R, AEI4CASC TmrA7w nmCT MAP No..sm 919,P ��__7. 40 41 F7 _ 43 I F jar 8PE a o 'DI o ..,.., J � O �.\ I Y C ytStn `//. '' 0 N. • cFC„ON A A � ^-..uc- 1 a� 45 Ix _-< 46 PE no PG 410 't Aia ' vsIREET'C .m.. �,urt - - - - - 89 4 CL\ � h Pl- �.. 4 a .A .\ .� •- 5EMON AI-AI R _ 1S2 PL W2P ^ ASS PE 1 l rl mi w l r L HB M I F ; i �--h-- IRAC!BWNOA aou,w euuoc - 'I 1316.33' _ III rtw ,i I ImzP 00 - .._. _ _. 36 _d6____ I 11 - .' 35 i TRACT 13565-3 MIR. 213/92-93 IF 27 i 26 I I SECTION O-O m..m�n...wv f 1 ,,"°°w AF,I4CASC TBVfATWTMCTMAPNO.N741 CONCEpI L4L CiRADM PLAN mx 39 659P.E. SECaUN C- 33 7 SECTION a,-RI 8 31 X� P.C. 26 785 PE 0 2 PEI 37 x All 692 PE 691 P.E. • K�PE 4 x �,36P 6ao Pf. 7� % W -A PN�F ------IL ------- SUBET18741 ARIKASC _�o TENTATIM 7MCr MAP NO 19741 CONCEPTUALOUDM PILM 42 45 ., 9Sl PE )� I .Bt3 PE 13 }'•. 8,6 1 936 PE / ° - 6 •4t ao P.y J 3 F �� ' '• 14 %� � ail Yi \I„ ]P FI ,. .fl . PC + a'gl I gllh I Q I , ����jj�-� I,u `�� i�•� 1Xi � - i `X �].I PE �L ,.]P£. .1as?PE umli A H II " [sarc. ` I._ '• I F F 9 �, r, ]e 9 ` E 0 X - 'eve _ 33 -- I� AW W8 PE i. X $. \l•�xr�. i' I ^� fl Y'� .II rl ....� ,., ` , 41 !. t 1 Tgi _ 4 34l./ 4 .;...I ...,�1 �. r. • r 7 y 7 r PE - _ m sfcnary f-f w ------ SELL- ON W—W � µ°rErSAII' LONCFEIE WA2R 8Vt 9--ma SEL]ION FfSEtbSELN Al-ATSUBTTI874TmrATNETRACTMAPNo. 97,0 �:°"t.•?,=: CONCsmI mL CVt4DM PLAN xrnsloxs �= "'` effr s w e "N 06 a08V -:A 26-08/07 - -- - TRACT BWNVARY �, AM 2a I 1d . N [ 1326.79' �� opq it Jf.a P- ` 1 ,I 19 18 sI 9so PE I 1i x rVE i, 000 Pe Wee E 8 92.0 PE. )PE' lq yY } A mo'Pe� fix, 11 f 43 44 72 I �Pb2 P.E Illmir 8. 98.2 PL Imo'I E 'i 1 Iy�"]yi�1 � -�� v I j I I L9❑° I �.l t ! I '. . I iii i Fred - �in j38' X i i -I G I - 3. 42 �45 l9so PE � p II .Fi I 1�\ 6 ]EPe 91}P.c ' 22 6E 'il f 13 a 93.6PCB6.0 PE J 0 ij�a I B09P OPE. } I \l\ a i AEI9CASC 7wrArw TRACT MAP NO iont CONCEPNAL ORADM PLAN � � PCV1910N9 �•ad� ����'� �!��C -------71 �.W � i i i ,. I I 1 I i i � � , i i I ` � i I i � I, I i en..�`i ... I r— � p I 1555 15H1555 cn —----- 155 155 SECTION G2-G2 rn: Xu HOER 1"-WY'". 1-2 her 10 2) SECTION G1—G1 + x x5 SUBM674 -,R), AEIACASC MCATW 7MCr MW NO.WV ®r�� -TUAL QUOM PLAN CONCS RMSIONS i I —1570 a i SECTION G4-C4 . SECTIO G3—G3 seas Hnpx r za'vam. Gz' —suLLxowLf..an'_v I=z mm (eux nee s xa_tl IyU.MP SHm 6V, 1I I I SSBI �$W C e� +S i q E �s — SUB77I8741 „,R�g AEI4CASC q.,"..,,.,' �: ..,®sW...4.e....aa„...,. rm,...,...."..._,... .,...".�.... t TaoNce vALTRAam PIJo.L m x COAK:EPTUAL CiRADfAO PLaW REVISIOH9 �--'•evn �e e� ,157s 1510 1510 it \ I I I I \nr I , — i SECTION �6—G' �\ �Ig••• `I I I scua Wore¢ f•m'I vERT o-z' .�\ 11580 SECTION G5—G5 11 li (rux,Here vQn sa..� \ i \ _____'_--__.�I.—(eux�nere-sxesxtxo.q g i !e f p f SUBTT18741 AEI*CASC ?` •'°w a �,:;* TBJTATNE TRACT WAP NO.18741 w,re ,... _ ,."'" COIIICL�IVAL ORADM PLAN e..D s fid_ 61ST�tP Q I � _ rt � v9e mm�u.o ' 1515 -1560.. . 11555 5F..CTION 11 -H4 SECT ON H2-H2 n sena HOW r.2a : 1-2 nAm Ham [,=, 'IYEPf. 1.Y ° (eLEx z11 sME¢r 1�0.sl t ' 00 w r I i I •n rr w.nq I I $ 1545' SECI'!'[ON HI-Hl___ _ o' v 1=2' �' SECTION 1-3—H3 p (Pr YIHI 5x[i M 2) SrAIL ROM 1'=M' n 4x91E m�wa. (ex SHEET OXO.2) F i i my e I i 9 TBJiAT1YETAACTMAP NO 18741 3 e--w- y ua ss.a C:ONCBTUAL CR4DM PLAN --- I i rraone I LW rt .M1 I rn • 1595 V Mu"7A ' I i i ru° i i - i I mxrrao"v a rt ,yes. ECT—TION ECTION H6—H61 7-1 Awa¢ ,S rrxom SBs ]I WPF scue Nola r-zavertc I=z (PIAN NQN s=xo al WS I co I I I i I xn 90 sy 11515 I yp ms 1 3 j ! SECTION H7—H71 i W" No= r.P5'rem 1.: 1 SECTION H5 1590 w.m` ( PION.H]=IMI.]) m.. . .... SCA@ Nmm:l 1'•N 1-z'H5 PLW' — 1580.—._ - ..._ _-i ..__. - r.� ns95 I sueTT?674 nt �;s AEI4CASC.®n 7ENTATNE TRACT MAP NO.197,9 OONCaliUAL CYiADfAO PLM 1 tld — P0ST CONSTRUCTION BMP INSPECT"AND MaMENANCE SCHEDULE b 11 AREA SUMMARY 0�If 1 it��, 1 I.. _ J N' .. v � _ r �. :• w ne.n. ..n .�. vy ..� ..Dant' lmml Fl j 1 1 y BASIN "A CAJ :n EILTRADO INN TRENCH CAI �A if F SOURCE/SITE CONTROL BMP'S TREATMENT CONTROI BMP'S LANDSCAPE"WAG('D-ID) OT INIXTRAWN IiWN qq r 1 1 I I O E1FICIFNT IflflIGAIIW(SD-12) OD INflliMnOx iNENCX O ALTERNATE WONG MATEPoAL ) � © CATCH BASIN INLPEC110N 1 • 05 SiQN CRNN S'CNALE flRtM ENERGY DS9PAiDR$ _ OD0ANN7WTS AND RODE DRAINS ®� LANDSHNDRAIN TO ADJACENT `` LANDSCAPING. I -�nvwam urrtl I e wwn rm I I .van mu uawn I 1 � -imm wau,. 77 II I low SECTION 9-R SECTION A-A €VVV PJukN WEN, SUB7T18]41 El0-I®IT C AE194A5� FINAL WATER GUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.18741 AT THE NOROF ARD"BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE CITY OF RANCHO AM N NDA,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY uhsloNs �I f tY 4 Y ,I. I S � I I I F—"RluwywLL quumrW. 1 ��.n RYR/Lap l!'y1 j( wr Mp w-wn j 9L6718741 r, UE _ AEIC��CASC TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18741 CUf AAD FIL MAP I a r i9 m aav RMtRlll! -1^ - aefr me m x TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18741 % FIRE ACCESS EXHIBIT WWI 20 v t ­CT fA all, LEGMD �- m4p ,77� N ------------- Jul, .4 f SECWN A- T - k1 nSi SFCTION Q-� I Q9 ------------- ------- -------------- ------- SECDMAI-A ,Rzi h SUQTF1574 OWNERIAPPI • • • Proposed Preliminary Plant Lggen L It MMI 4 mr I 1 _ SbYb ti� � 1 mnProject Entry Monument-�,.. Ex 47 Perimeter Wall,Typical-.n 117 m 1 i 7 r 1 n 1 .� � Secondary Entry and Entry Portal-r+.0 - _ _ WILSON AVENUE eo.ac x..a. wre urm,m, Conceptual Landscape Plan .i�.-n•..n�.F-w M mti.�swb .--. 1^ww++ta«fvv � ••daMsr M ~e~ RANCHO SUMMIT •--• Tract#18741 - Rancho Cucamonga,CA CENTEX I INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION . .�n ENVIRONMENTAL in INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Division 1909)477-2750 The purpose of thisform Is to inform the City of the+baslc,domponents of the proposed„ prole}ct so that the Crty may review the,project pursuant to City ide Policies,tOrdinances; Guroclines, the` California Environmental Quality Act;' and the City's ,Rules ,and Pedures to Implement CEQA It isYimportant that the information requested �n this 111 i - ,, 'wl i ikil i P �y iwrvl x� a'+p ✓ tw } rp �i v- appli.y -cation . r� w�'Yi, GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: TTM18741 Project Title: Name&Address of project owner(s): Wentex Homes 1265 Corona Pointe Court Corona CA 92879 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Centex Homes Contact Person&Address: Bob Fleming, Project Manager Centex Homes Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Telephone Number: 951-479-9346 P6 1/1 / 13 EXHIBIT �•7�■ — Page 1 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-24 PROJECT I 1 DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. • '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Project located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): APN 0226-081-05 &06 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 40.12 '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications): 37.50 acres (subtracting dedication for Wilson Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): No General Plan Amenndment or Zone Change is proposed. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Design Review for Product Grading and Building Permits NPDES/SWPPP 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability.plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The 40 acre site ranges in elevation from 1560 at Wilson Avenue to 1620 on the north boundary, a natural slope of less than 5%. The soils on site consist of Hanford coarse sandy loam Soboba gravelly loamy sand and stony loamy sand, and Tujun a gravelly loamy sand. The vegetation on site is dominated • by alluvial fan sage scrub - with prominent plant specis including: California buckwheat California TTMI8741.EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 2 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-25 sagebrush, horehound, and deerweed. The wildlfe typical of the site includes: desert cottontail, Pacific/ San Deigo Kangaroo rat, Los Angeles pocket mouse, black-tailed jack rabbit, common raven, Western • bluebird, and Anna's huimmingbird. There are no existing structures or unique features of any kind present at the site. Please refer to the following for more detailed information: General Biological Resources Report, dated July 2008, prepared by LSA Associates San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Focused Survey, dated April 4, 2008, prepared by LSA Associates California Gnatcatcher Focused Survey, dated July 2008, prepared by LSA Associates Jurisdictional Delineation, Dated May 2008, prepared by LSA Associates Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, dated May 2004, prepared by LGC Inland Geotechnical Review of Conceptual Grading Plan, dated December 2008, prepared by LGC Inland 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books, published reports and oral history): There are no known cultural or historical aspects or features on the site. • 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft, roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: The site is currently subject to the impact of roadway noise from adjacent residential development along Wilson Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road. The existing roadway noise will not have a significant affect on the proposed subdivision. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The proposed project includes the subdivision of the 40-acre site into 53 lots for the future development of detached single-family residences. The project also includes two lettered lots to be used for WQ Basins and will include a system of equestrian use easments for protential homeowner equstrian use and access to Community Equestrian trails. The WQ Basins, equestrian easments, some perimeter landscaping, and perimeter Fire Access Easement will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association. • TTM 18741.Environmental lnfoForm Page 3 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-26 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use(one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Residential development is present on the NE, SE and SW corners of Wilson Avenue and Wardman- Bullock Road. North of the project site are two 5-acre parcels and a minor subdivision upon which individual custom homes have been developed in recent years. The land area adjacent to the west and northwest is owned by County of San Bernardino Flood Control District as Conservation Lands and Flood Control basin complex. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed residential subdivision will be compatible with the surrounding residential development. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these , noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Project development will result in short-term noise impacts from construction and long-term impacts of roadway noise generated by future residents; neither short-term or long-term noise impacts will have a significant affect on the adjacent residential properties. "16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There are no trees present on the site. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The undeveloped property drains generally in the southwesterly direction. Due to the coarse and cobbly nature of the soils very little run-off occurs in the undeveloped condition. The developed site will drain into the City storm drain system that is located in the immediate vicinity of Wilson Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road. • TTM18741.EnvironmentallnfoFom Page 4 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-27 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 37,365.00 Peak use(gal/Day) • b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ® Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 14,310.00 b. Commercial/Industrial(galldaylac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:53 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Lots range in size from a minimum of 20,000SF to a maximum of approximately 40,OOOSF the average lot area is 25 325SF. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): All future home sites will be 'For-Sale' 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Product for this neighborhood has not yet been selected, therefore pricing, bedroom count and similar information is not available at this time. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Potentially in the range of 2-5 individuals per household, depending on final home sizes selelcted. Student Generation Rate for the Etiwanda School District is combined K-8 at 0.5795 students per SFD; • CJUHSD Student Generation Rate is 0.1838 students per SFD - see results below: TTM 18741.Environmental lnfol'orm Page 5 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-28 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary. 31 • b. Junior High: c. Senior High 10 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major functions)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: • Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): • TTM18741.EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 6 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-29 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. • Initial contact with all pertinent agencies has not uncovered any barriers to the provision of water, sewer and/or storm drain services or infrastructure to the site. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. No known use of hazardous materials has occurred at the site. Refer to the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment prepared by LGC Inland Inc dated May 24, 2004 for background data. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic • materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? 11 yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No use of hazardous materials is proposed at this site. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. /further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: Title: Project Manager, Centex Homes • TTM18741.EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 7 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-30 ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day • Residential Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2,500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3,000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General Commercial 2,000 gal/day/ac • Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1,500 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3,000 gal/day/ac Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 • TTM78741.EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 8 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G31 ATTACHMENT B �ontact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 . (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School • Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 • TTM 18741.EnvironmentallnfoForm Page 9 of 9 Created on 1/9/2009 4:24:00 PM G-32 t Ellrr l , : 77 u. Stll GLFJfD A i fII�'-+�� (�"\_yj-"y t.;: 1 i i ✓ 4'1^ 1. t�v ` 1 �po � �}tig GW P� "in I.. I :: .: RO I— xfCl(WX ti _� rT1Tr r f n N G-33 1J, a _ - ,.- / � • it �� O __ __ —_ ! i 2, Project Location Iv T ACLU Y�1+ M 1 I _ � J{ - 'WILSINA VENUE- I SWAMI7�=jl� i I � " al 1 CSCANYONROAD- - Y ,Summit Ane j �w05 / 1 GdYlnq 'Q � p 1 Stazlon > Regional Location t —` TM N II .J1 tI , i. s la Arrgely _!Y : Project Area -4 ;i ��`"`_� / - - 4�• as � LF o U s .. to 201 L c A FIGURE I • Center Hames 0 1.000 :.000 Rancho Summit Project - FEET SOURCE:USGS 7.5'Quads:Cucamonga Peak(198S),CA:Thomas eros.(2007). Regional and Project Location IdCH0080J`mpoMWio\rcg_InC.=d(0:.'07/08) G'34 p:\521196\Planning\Tentative_TraeLA1ap\Euhibila\ 521796-0(11T ELECT-0G9191T.Ecg 12/22/08 14.2CJ�. nD °m O� a r our -,D Y—A ZN s" L k C y ld Cn^ S N L I � .01 m • I - s e .. a 1 1 n.,rL , ; ____..__. .... .. ._ s" l EXIST: STREET - >,:..._....._, b��• EXIST. 'STREEI' u LIGHT .LIGHT EXIST. STREET EXIST. UNDERGROUND LIGHT ELECTRIC i ° L 0 1V� C om 0 0 s yy' Photo • • Photo • • Photo Photo I .:aa. ~ N Photo i City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX HOMES - A residential subdivision of 53 single-family lots on 40.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road -APN:0226-081-05 and 06 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Steven Ford 29900 Villa Alturas Temecula, CA 92592 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential 6. Zoning: Very Low Residential • 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is two rectangular shaped parcels totaling 40.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan that the applicant would like to subdivide into 53 lots with 51 being proposed as single-family residential lots with two lots proposed as basins for water quality purposes. The parcels are vacant and located on the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. To the north of the project is a partially built subdivision of single-family residences, to the south and to the east across Wardman Bullock Road are existing single-family residences and to the west is the flood control basin. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 ext. 4311 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report • FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides G-38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 2 ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD— South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP— Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G —Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than-Significant-Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓)Agricultural Resources (✓)Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas (✓) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation (✓) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: • ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made.by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a 'Potentially Significant Impact' or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been . addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Date: / I %.3 ,Z • Reviewed By: Date: f G39 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 3 • Less Than Sigecan: Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pgentianr With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No moa=t Inc...,ated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? G) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho • Cucamonga. C) Thg site is located on the northwest corner of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue and is characterized by single-family development to the south and east, a partially developed single-family development to the north and a flood control basin to the west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because this project is consistent with the area as there are existing single-family residences on three sides of the projects: Design.Review is required, prior to approval and this project was reviewed by staff and is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the • California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? G 40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB 77118741 Page 4 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant mtigabon Significant No Impact Incomoraled ImIm pact oacl C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is vacant land located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road and is characterized by single-family development to the south and east, a partially developed single-family development to the north and a flood control basin to the west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California • Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is vacant land located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman • Bullock Road and is characterized by single-family development to the south and east, a partially developed single-family development to the north and a flood control basin to the G-41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 5 • ess Than SigniUcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmenaauy With Than PP g SigniOcant F4imaaon Signinct No Da (moan mcamoranea Impact Impact west. Although there is grazing land adjacent to the site this area has been isolated from the wild life interface by the construction of a flood control basin to the west and homes to the north, south and east of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? • d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan .FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The • California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this G-42 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 6 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with man pp 9 Significant "tiga ion Sian, cant No Impact In Misstated Impact Imoact include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have • additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, Pi and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by (Michael Brandman Associates, October 6, 2011) that utilizes the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod.). CaIEEMod Version 2011.1.1 methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts Emissions(pounds Source w ROG/VOC iNOx { CO, _.�-SO.T .P io 1 —PAL5:" Overlap: Paving, 45.4 72.7 49.7 <0.1 6.2 5.5 Building, Painting Paving 5.6 33.9 22 <0.1 3.1 2.9 Site Grading w/ 11.6 97.2 54.4 0.1 47.4 5.7 • mitigation Building 5.4 35.8 25.5 <0.1 2.7 2.3 Construction G-43 Initial Study for. City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less With Th..Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SpificM MNgsaon Significant No Impact Incgmmatatl Impact Impact Coating 34.4 3.0 2.2 <0.1 0.4 0.3 Maximum Daily 45.4 97.2 54.4 0.1 47.4 5.7 Emissions Significance 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact? Note:The maximum daily emissions refer to the maximum emissions that would occur in one day; it was assumed that the grading activities do not occur at the same time as the other construction activities;therefore, their emissions are not summed. VOG =Volatile organic compounds; NOx= nitrogen oxides; CO=carbon monoxide; SOx= oxides sulfur oxides; PM10 and PM2-5= particulate matter Source of thresholds: South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011 a. Source of Emissions: Appendix A: CaIEEMod Output Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and • motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land, clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. There will be residential building proposed for the project at a later date. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 34.4 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 Ibs/day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre- coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent G-44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 8 Less Than • SignificantLess Issues and Suing Information Sources: Potentially with Than pport significant Mitigation Significam No Impact Incorporated Imoact Impact transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) • Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) During project construction, construction equipment shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low • emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also G-45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotanOally wim Than Significant mbpuon Significant No Impact Inwmaratetl Impact Impact conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1106. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil • during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt_is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • . Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans • include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. G-46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 10 Less Than • Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wlm Titan PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incomo aced Impact Imoact 10) During export of soil, there shall be a maximum of 500 truck-hauling miles per day. In addition, during each day of site grading, one of the following shall be complied with: • Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet or hours of operation to a maximum total of 11,226 horsepower hours per day (the sum of each equipment's horsepower multiplied by the hours in operation per day). • All off-road equipment shall utilize Tier 2 engines or better. Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet or hours of operation to a maximum total of 13,890 horsepower hours per day. • All off-road equipment shall utilize Tier 3 engines or better. Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet hours of operation to a maximum total of 22,712 horsepower hours per day. • A combination of onsite equipment and hours with onsite nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions less than 81.2 pounds per day. 11) During project construction, the developer shall prohibit onsite construction equipment from idling for more than 5 minutes in any one hour. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the • impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,g) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Table 3: Project-Related Emissions Burden (Summer) Emission (pounds per day) Source ROGN OC NOx CO SOx PM,fi PMz.S Area 2.3 0.1 4.6 0.00 0.1 0.1 Natural Gas 0.01 0.5 0.2 0.00 <0.1 <0.1 Mobile 8.2 24.1 96.1 0.2 19.6 1.3 Horses 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.2 Total 11.6 24.7 100.9 0.2 21.2 1.6 • Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 G-47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 11 • La::'roan Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Foganti: ral wilt Than PP g Significant MWgation Significant No Impact Incons.,ated Imaact Imnact Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact Notes: Area sources include painting, consumer products, hearth and landscaping VOG =Volatile organic compounds; NOx= nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx= oxides sulfur oxides; PM10 and PM2.5 = particulate matter Source of Emissions:Appendix A: CaIEEMod Output Lona Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residents in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The • stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on- site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors included in the Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on October 6, 2011 long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2011. 1. 1 (CaIEEMod), shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds/ or the project will exceed the corresponding SCAQMD daily emissions threshold. Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 2) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. • 3) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. G-48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 12 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sipifi antlly wuh Than PP g SiImpct coneor"hgabate Siaheadnl No na Impact Incorporaletl Impact Impaq 4) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile • of a sensitive receptor. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga.General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 5) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • G-49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 13 • Less Than Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sotennany with man PP 9 Significant MNgaUon Significant No ImDacl Incorpofdletl impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife • corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources: the Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR). The project site is located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. The site is generally characterized by residential development to the south and east, with vacant parcels and partially constructed homes to the north, a flood control basin to the west, and grazing land to the northwest. The grazing land adjacent to the site has been isolated from the wildlife interface by the construction of a flood control basin to the west and homes to the north, south and east of the project site. -The site has also been minimally disrupted during construction of infrastructure along the east property line for the construction of public right of way and surrounding developments. According to the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, • Inc. on October 24, 2011 a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) plant community covers approximately 32.29 acres. The remainder of the site contains G-50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 14 Less Than • significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Tnan PP 9 s.gmficant mfigehon significant No Impact Incomomted Imoact Impact approximately 4.90 acres of Chamise Chaparral, 0.86 acres of Non-Native grassland and 0.19 acres are developed. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 38.24 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank) at a minimum of the equivalent to 38.24 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. According to the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on October 24, 2011, no San Bernardino Kangaroo Rats were trapped and they were determined to be not present on the project site during trapping surveys conducted on July 17, 2011, and October 6, through October 11, 2011. According to the same General Biological Resources Assessment a focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher survey was conducted from May 23 to July 9, 2011 with seven site visits during the survey the Coastal California Gnatcatcher was not observed within the project site. No substantial project impacts to special status species were anticipated in the assessment. There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily and it was observed scattered across the site during the 2008 rare plant survey and 2011 gnatcatcher survey. Although • Plummer's mariposa lily is not federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 2) The project applicant shall prepare a Plummer's mariposa lily mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. The plan shall consist of transplantation or other methods of removal including "set aside" and transplantation at a receiver site(s), bulb collection or bulb augmentation within a greenhouse for future transplantation under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. The receiver site(s) shall be ecologically suitable and shall include the recordation of a conservation easement or deed restriction. According to Table B (Special Status Species Potentially Occurring in the Project Vicinity) of the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on October 24, 2011, the "occurrence probability" of the Burrowing Owl is "absent as the "vegetation is too dense with too many large shrubs." Therefore no adverse impact is anticipated. According to the Jurisdictional Delineation Report prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on May 2008, "none of the drainages on-site have a nexus to traditional navigable waters or any other interstate commerce nexus. In addition, there were no areas that met the 3 parameters (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology) necessary to meet the Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) definition of a jurisdictional wetland." Furthermore, "none of the drainages display a contiguous channel bed and bank throughout the entire length of the drainage course traversing the site. Additionally, no riparian vegetation associated with drainages that would be potentially subject to • California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdiction exists on-site." Lastly, "because none of the drainages on-site have a nexus to traditional navigable waters or G-51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 15 • Less Than S'. "C Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wm rnan PP g Significant Mitigation Signif ant No impact Inwrgorate0 impact Impact any other interstate commerce. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act does not apply. However, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has authority...jurisdiction is based on the federal definition of wetlands (three-parameter) and other waters (OHWM) as recommended by the September 2004 Workplan." There are no wetlands on the project site and, "there were a few areas where the channel bed and banks were observed but an OHWM was not present...RWQCB jurisdiction could not be acknowledged under the recommendations from the September 2004 Workplan." b) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is located within the Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub habitat. According to the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on October 24, 2011 a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) plant community covers approximately 32.29 acres. The area has been isolated from the wildlife corridor by the construction of the flood control basin to the west and single-family residential development to the north, south, and east. However the Etiwanda Creek and the San Sevaine Preserve continue to provide a corridor for migrating wildlife. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 3) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 38.24 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified • mitigation bank) at a minimum of the equivalent to 38.24 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. According to the Jurisdictional Delineation Report prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on May 2008, "none of the drainages on-site have a nexus to traditional navigable waters or any other interstate commerce nexus. In addition, there were no areas that met the 3 parameters (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology) necessary to meet the Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) definition of a jurisdictional wetland." Furthermore, "none of the drainages display a contiguous channel bed and bank throughout the entire length of the drainage course traversing the site. Additionally, no riparian vegetation associated with drainages that would be potentially subject to California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdiction exists on-site." Lastly, "because none of the drainages on-site have a nexus to traditional navigable waters or any other interstate commerce, Section 401 of the Clean Water Act does not apply. However, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has authority...jurisdiction is based on the federal definition of wetlands (three-parameter) and other waters (OHWM) as recommended by the September 2004 Workplan." There are no wetlands on the project site and, "there were a few areas where the channel bed and banks were observed but an OHWM was not present...RWQCB jurisdiction could not be acknowledged under the recommendations from the September 2004 Workplan." C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous • natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. According to the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on G-52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S -. Potentially with Than pp gormaSources: Significant "agaeon Significant No Impact Incomorated haiact ImOad October 24, 2011," in the vicinity of the project site the Etiwanda Fan, wildlife movement corridors have been identified as the Etiwanda Creek Wash area and the San Sevaine Wash area down to the Santa Ana River—the project site is nearly surrounded by residential housing on the north, south and east. A levee that is part of the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds borders the western edge of the site. This development along with the freeways in the vicinity of the project site has cut off any potential corridors. Therefore the development of the project site would not substantially affect wildlife movement in the area." Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? • b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.18. There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho • Cucamonga will: G-53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incoroorated Impact Imoact • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed • salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. G-54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 18 Less Than • Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,. injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a . known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo • Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: • a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the G-55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 19 • fy Less Than Sgnificanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S,.Nfilant with Tnan PP 9 Sio ficanl 'lI On Significant No Imoact Incorporated arnacl Impact General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1 mile west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lays approximately 3/< of a mile north. These faults are both capable of producing Mµ, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M,,,7.5 earthquakes is 5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 9 miles north of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than- significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The'site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved • by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR G-56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 20 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant "ligation Significant No Imoact Inconcorated Imoact Imoact Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically excessively drained and highly permeable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) () indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Siqnificance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). _ In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG • emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CHa], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydro fluorocarbons [HFCs], per fluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SFB]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for • 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. G-57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 significant Mitigation 9gnlficant No Impact Incornorated Impact Im act It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of • California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Analysis prepared by Michael Brandman Associates, October 6, 2011 the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH,], nitrous oxide [N2O], and hydro fluorocarbons [HFCs] and would not result in the other GHG's - (per fluorocarbons [PFCs] and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]). As seen in the tables below the proposed project would result in a total of 1,264 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 395 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 2,617 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 3012 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section '4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as • CO2, Ch,, and N2O. CH, is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. G-58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 22 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenYally wan Than PP g Significant A4agation Spftant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Construction greenhouse Gas Emissions Emissions (pounds CO2e per da Das Total Onsite Offsite Subtotal y MTCOZe Grading 20,125 2,563 22,688 59 699 Building 4,050 405 4,455 245 546 Construction Paving 2,928 189 3,117 29 45 Coating 282 50 332 22 4 Total – --- — 355 1,264 Average(30 years) --- --- --- – 42 Notes:MTCOze=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents=pounds per day x days x0.0005 Source:Ca[EEMod output(Appendix A) Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to • less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG'S Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of • electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the G-59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 23 • Less Toon SlgMmni Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°lemially wm Than Significant Mnigafion Significant No Im°ac1 Incoroaretetl Imoact Imoecl project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. Table 19: Project Opera ional Greenhouse Gases Emissions Reduction Emissions with Source (MTCOZe per year) (%) Reductions MTCO2e per ear Motor Vehicles __ 2,617 10 2355 Natural Gas 115 --- 115 Elect c ty 171 20 137 Water 23 15 20 Waste 28 --- 28 Air Conditioning 56 --- 56 • Subtotal- 3,010 --- Operations Total 2,711 Subtotal— 42 -7 Construction Total 42 (Average 30 years) Total 3,052 — 2,753 SCAQMD Draft 3,000 --- 3,000 Threshold Potentially Yes --- significant No impacts? Notes:See Air Quality Study prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on October 6,2011 for Sources. The project involves the subdivision of approximately 40 acres of vacant land for the future construction of 51 single-family residences and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including water efficient landscaping, • fiber optic communications infrastructure, sidewalks, and fire defensible space. G-60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 24 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Fotarnialty Wah man n pp g SigN6wnt NLtigation Significat No Imoact Incorporated Impact Imoa] The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, local trails that connect to Community Trails, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy(SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. • Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. G-61 Initial Study for I City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 25 • Less Th 9cantgnifian Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmanuain with than PP g urceSignificant oon Significant No Impact n.omo,morared Impact Impact 5) To conserve water, the following measures shall be implemented into the site design, to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: • The project shall comply with City Efficient Landscape Ordinance, regardless of the size of the landscaped area. • Implement water conservation measures to provide at least a 15 percent reduction in water consumption beyond that required by regulation. • The homebuyer shall be provided with local resources on drought- tolerant plants to be used for landscaping. _-_ • Do not impose minimum grass/turf amounts anywhere on the project site. • Require the landscape palette to provide a minimum of 40 percent drought-resistant species and to offer landscape design that excludes turflgrass. • Install low flow appliances (i.e., toilets, dishwashers, shower heads, washing machines, etc.). • 6) The project shall comply with voluntary energy efficiency measures included in one of the following programs or other program approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development certification (the most recent version), Green Point Rating, or CalGreen (the mandatory measures and a minimum of three residential Tier 1 and or Tier 2 voluntary measures). Verification of certification/ compliance shall be submitted to the City pursuant to City requirements. 7) The project shall incorporate the following measures where feasible considering lot configuration, terrain, neighborhood aesthetics, and consistent with City standard to reduce energy use: • Plant shade trees to maximize cooling benefits and not interfere with solar panel installations (generally within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties). • Construct single-family residential units to be able to easily convert to solar power(i.e., solar ready). • Photovoltaic cells (solar panels) shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option. The residential units shall utilize techniques to minimize energy use and maximize ventilation to take advantage of sun/shade patterns and • prevailing winds. G-62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 26 Leu Than • Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Potentially Whh Than PP q Significant W,gatoh Significant Na Impact Incorporaled Impact Impact The proposed project will result in 3,052 MTCO2eq/yr (total project emissions) of operational related emission without reduction from project design features. Based on the reduction measures proposed for the project and the Mitigation Measures the project would reduce its GHG emission to 2,753 MTCO2eq/yr which is below the "business as usual" scenario as identified in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report by Michael Brandman Associates, October 6, 2011. b) The project proposes the subdivision of approximately 40 acres of vacant land into 53 lots of which 51 will be utilized for single-family residences and 2 will be utilized as basins for water quality purposes. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney'General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes General Plan Policy LU-2.3: Provide direct pedestrian access connections between development projects where possible is accomplished by local equestrian and walking trails that connect to the Rancho Cucamonga trail system such as community trails in the area. General Plan Policy LU-10.1: Continue to require implementation of the City's Water Efficient Ordinance is accomplished by requiring all new developments to • submit landscape plans that illustrate that they meet all the requirements of the ordinance. General Plan Policy CM-2.1: Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide is again accomplished by connecting this project to the City's Community Trail that connects with both local and regional trails throughout the City by implementing the principles of the City's Trail Implementation Plan. General Plan Policy RC-3.1: Require the use of cost- effective methods to conserve water in new developments and promote appropriate water conservation and efficiency measures for existing businesses and residences by promoting water drip irrigation and requiring all construction meet the building code Title 24. And General Plan Policy PF-7.1: Continue to adopt programs and practices that minimize the amount of materials entering the waste stream. Encourage recycling and composting in all sectors of the community, including recycling of construction and demolition materials, in order to divert items from entering landfills. This is done by requiring builders to submit a deposit to the City which requires the builder to recycle at least 50 percent of the construction materials. The developer of the proposed project will be required to provide fiber optic communications infrastructure, local trails that connect to Community trails, sidewalks, fire defensible space, and water efficient landscaping and, therefore, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. • G-63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant ANugation Significant No anoact Incomorated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the • project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant • impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. G-64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 28 Less Than • significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenhagy with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigabon significarn No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest schools, Etiwanda Colonies at 13144 Banyan Street and Summit Intermediate School at 5959 East Avenue, are about 1 mile southwest of the project site. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. • f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. The project is located with the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. The City recognizes the risk and has adopted policies and Standard Conditions that limit uses to Very Low density residential development and Hillside residential uses in these areas to limit property exposed to wildland fire hazards. The project shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan to outline appropriate measures to address fire hazards. Therefore, the following wildland fire mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and • design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. G-65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 29 • Less Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pctenvany with man PP 9 Significant mt,q.on Signifaant No Impact Incorporated Imnacl Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result insubstantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, • which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water • Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. G-66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 30 Th Lass Than ht Less • L Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potantiaoy Man Than Significant mwq.bon Sigm9canl No nlpaLl InLOlpof81C0 Impdtl ITpaQ Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) • for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by AEI-CASC Consulting, August 2009, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of • grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance G-67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741, Page 31 • ess Than SigNficanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sgnifiwnl Nlgaaon Than gnifi. No Impact Incarporaletl Imoac( (moan program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by AEI-CASC Consulting, August 2009 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizersipesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be • monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. • d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. G-68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 32 Less Than • sm_nifcam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poienfially with Tnan PP 9 &gnifoant Mtigation Significant No Imoact Incmocmted tmoact 1 Impact All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event; thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City • Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the • City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. G-69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 33 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Tnan PP g significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoact Imoact j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? • Comments: a) The site is located on the northwest corner df Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue and is characterized by single-family development to the south and east, a partially developed single-family development to the north and a flood control basin to the west. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, and east of the project. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Very Low Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. General Plan Policy LU-2.3: Provide direct pedestrian access connections between development projects where possible is accomplished by local equestrian and walking trails that connect to the Rancho Cucamonga trail system such as community trails in the area. General Plan Policy LU-10.1: Continue to require implementation of the City's Water Efficient Ordinance is accomplished by requiring all new developments to submit landscape plans that illustrate that they meet all the requirements of the ordinance. General Plan Policy CM-2.1; Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide is again accomplished by connecting this project to the City's Community Trail that connects with both local and regional trails throughout the City by implementing the principles of the City's Trail Implementation Plan. General Plan Policy RC-3.1: Require the use of cost- effective methods to conserve water in new developments and promote appropriate water conservation and efficiency measures for existing businesses and residences by promoting water drip irrigation and requiring all construction meet the building code Title 24. And, General Plan Policy PF-7.1: Continue to adopt programs and practices that minimize the amount of materials entering the waste stream. Encourage recycling and • composting in all sectors of the community, including recycling of construction and demolition materials, in order to divert items from entering landfills. This is done by requiring builders to submit a deposit to the City which requires the builder to recycle at least 50 percent of the construction materials. As such, no impacts are anticipated. G-70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 34 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant mugauon Significant No Imoact Inccroorated Imoact Inched C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a • valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • G-71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 35 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information 'Sources: Potentiaiq with Than PP 9 SigniGcaN MRoal Significem No Imoact Incomorated Impact Imoact Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. A Mitigation Measure has been included to mitigate construction related noise during grading of the site. No adverse impacts expected with Mitigation. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and-how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Interior: Specific mitigation measures for interior noise impacts are not possible at this time as the project does not include a house product. Mitigations measures cannot be established without knowing the design of the houses. Therefore: 1) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is • submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. There may be short-term construction related vibration. However, the applicant will be required to follow all City requirements regarding construction activities. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times • may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then G-72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 36 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g S�goficanl Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoaci (moan construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is • offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in an area that is being developed for residential uses and will include the construction of 51 single-family homes. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. • G-73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 37 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially "n Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncoNOrated Impact Impact b) The project site is vacant land located in a residentially zoned district. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. C) The project site is vacant land located in a residentially zoned district. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) _Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located on the northwest corner of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, would be served by Fire Station #6 located at 5840 East Avenue approximately 0.6 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Legacy Park located at 5858 Santa Ynez Place about 0.5-mile from the • project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. G-74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 38 Less Than • Slgnlficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poteotiauy wrth roan Significant A4ogation Significant No Impact Incorporated Imoacl Impact e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect • on the environment? Comments: a). The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Legacy Park located at 5858 Santa Ynez Place about 0.5-mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • G-75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 39 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incproprdted Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? • d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 507.21 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the subdivision of 40 acres into 53 lots for 51 lots proposed for future development of detached single-family residential units and 2 t be utilized as basins for water quality. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family detached dwelling unit will generate 9.57 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is developed with existing street improvements or that will be included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each detached single-family dwelling unit will generate 1.75 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San G-76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 40 Less Than • SignificantLess Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wit Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is being developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during • construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is residential. Although houses are not part of the proposal, when the houses are submitted for review, adequate parking, specifically an enclosed garage and a driveway, in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code will be required. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • G-77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 41 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mhigation Significant No Impact InWrporatetl Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding • solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. G-78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 42 Than an • LessS,ghfficarh Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentlalty wth Than Significant M109aaon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: • a) According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources: the Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR). The project site is located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. The site is generally characterized by residential development to the south and east, with vacant parcels and partially constructed homes to the north, a flood control basin to the west, and grazing land to the northwest. The grazing land adjacent to the site has been isolated from the wildlife interface by the construction of a flood control basin to the west and homes to the north, south and east of the project site. -The site has also been minimally disrupted during construction of infrastructure along the east property line for the construction of public right of way and surrounding developments. According to the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on October 24, 2011 a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) plant community covers approximately 32.29 acres. The remainder of the site contains approximately 4.90 acres of Chamise Chapparral, 0.86 acres of Non-Native grassland and 0.19 acres developed. With the incorporation of the attached mitigation measures to offset the removal of the 38.24 acres of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, the proposed project will have a less-than-significant impact. According to the General Biological Resources Assessment prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. on October 24, 2011, no San Bernardino Kangaroo Rats were trapped and they were determined to be not present on the project site during trapping surveys conducted on July 17, 2011, and October 6, through October 11, 2011. According to the same General • Biological Resources Assessment a focused Coastal California Gnatcatcher survey was conducted from May 23 to July 9, 2011 with seven site visits during the survey the Coastal G-79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 Page 43 • Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 significant kligahon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact California Gnatcatcher was not observed within the project site. No substantial project impacts to special status species were anticipated in the assessment. There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily and it was observed scattered across the site during the 2008 rare plant survey and 2011 gnatcatcher survey. Although Plummer's mariposa lily is not federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered, with the incorporation of the attached mitigation measure, the proposed project will have a less-than-significant impact. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification'of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing • mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation.of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) • (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) G-80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18741 Page 44 (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update • (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) (T) Etiwanda North Specific Plan EIR (SCH #89012314, certified April 1, 1992) (T) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Michael Brandman Associates, October 6, 2011 (hardcopy to South Coast Air Quality Management District; all others refer to attached CD) (T) General Biological Resources Assessment for the Rancho Summit Project LSA Associates Inc., October 24, 2011 (T) Water Quality Management Report AEI CASC, Revised August 2009 • • G-81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18741 Page 45 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly nosignifcant environmental effects would occur. r, Applicant's Signature: � '� Date: i Print Name and Title: cAnrportbKrwgiman I\sflower11381466 t.doc cinrportbllrwginnan1\sflower%l381468_t.doc • • G-82 • City of Rancho Cucamonga �. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT18741 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 G-83 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT18741 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe project planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • G-84 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 Applicant: Centex Homes Initial Study Prepared by: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner Date: 7-22-12 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. of Verified Sanctions for FrequencyImplementing Action for Monitoring Date /Initials Non-Compliance r 'ir/El�q i�a:llu�^f+r .I Ialp, rAlr QUalll >F� .l y,, r F II �.. a 114111:,:.ylr Ill uy�h luailru,l lhl.l��,llw+ ;. y „I,glp1. gjd�1,1 6,y IIlP I IV III I;i ..S d „., a , ,,ppy�,,yy,��f lll III, . }.uh.l� ,..:.�Lli 111 IIII IIu,PL 7v h' ;:G.�MxasameY .cuwhrl !:..!.v.: ..,lIN, t'•.;. "'_ l r I;Lplllp!11.tl...+LLaa.L�.,,,'V.w 4: l.I'Ll '' ",law�+r k�.!i� .5,_w..., D'n,dt.ekY h:n•-,:u�4. L a�{+99t'vsl d, Itlu l..d. '9 During project construction, construction equipment PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City 00 verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall complywith SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: 1 of 14 Mitigation . . g of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-Compliance Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 214 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. 9 Q Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds(Le., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW QCB])daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PMIO) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 2of14 0 0 0 0 0 Mitigation . . . . of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During export of soil, there shall be a maximum of 500 BO C During A 4 truck-hauling miles per day. In addition, during each day construction of site grading, one of the following shall be complied with: • Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet or hours of operation to a maximum total of 11,226 horsepower hours per day (the sum of each equipment's horsepower multiplied by the hours in operation per day). • All off-road equipment shall utilize Tier 2 engines or better. Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet or � hours of operation to a maximum total of 13,890 horsepower hours per day. • All off-road equipment shall utilize Tier 3 engines or better. Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet hours of operation to a maximum total of 22,712 horsepower hours per day. • A combination of onsite equipment and hours with onsite nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions less than 81.2 pounds per day. During project construction,the developer shall prohibit BO C During A 4 onsite construction equipment from idling for more than construction 5 minutes in any one hour. Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 planting programs to comply with the AOMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 3of14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. The developer shall purchase and reserve a minimum PD B B 2 � P P P Review of plans cO of 38.24 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank)at a minimum of equivalent to 38.24 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. The project applicant shall prepare a Plummer's PD B Review of plans B 2/4 mariposa lily mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a grading permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. The plan shall consist of transplantation or other methods of removal including "set aside" and transplantation at a receiver site(s), bulb collection or bulb augmentation within a greenhouse for future transplantation under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. The receiver site(s) shall be ecologically suitable and shall include the recordation of a conservation easement or deed restriction. M �.(;feenhOUSe GaS�ErTIISSlOnS.'� L x1 -- 4 of 14 • • Mitigation Measur . Responsible Monitoringg of Method . . . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compllance The project must comply with all rules that assist in BO C During A 4 reducing short-term air pollutant emission in Construction compliance with SCAW MD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. The construction contactor shall select construction BO C During A 4 equipment based on low-emission factors and high Construction energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 BO C During A 4 minutes. Construction c� Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in BO C During A 4 lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where Construction feasible Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with BO C During A 4 peak-hour traffic Construction Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported BO C During A 4 and encouraged for construction crew. Construction Construction and Building materials shall be produced BO A During C 2 and/or manufactured locally. Use "green Building Construction Materials'such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 5of14 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code BO A Review of Plans C 2 Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: Increased insulation Limit air leakage through the structure Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems Install light colored"cool"roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for C) outdoor lighting. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy BO A Review of plans C 2 appropriate for the project and include the following: Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. CE A Review of Plans C 2 Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 6of14 0 0 0 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date 11nitlals Non-Compliance To conserve water, the following measures shall be BO A Review of plans C 2 implemented into the site design, to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: • The project shall comply with City Efficient Landscape Ordinance, regardless of the size of the landscaped area. • Implement water conservation measures to provide at least a 15 percent reduction in water consumption beyond that required by regulation. • The homebuyer shall be provided with local resources on drought-tolerant plants to be used for landscaping. • Do not impose minimum grass/turf amounts anywhere on the project site. • Require the landscape palette to provide a minimum of 40 percent drought-resistant species and to offer landscape design that exclude turf/grass. • Install low flow appliances(i.e.,toilets,dishwashers, shower heads, washing machines, etc.). The project shall comply with voluntary energy BO B Review of plans C 2 efficiency measures included in one of the following programs or other program approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development certification (the most recent version), Green Point Rating, or CalGreen (the mandatory measures and a minimum of three residential Tier 1 and or Tier 2 voluntary measures). Verification of certification/compliance shall be submitted to the City pursuant to City requirements. 7of14 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance The project shall incorporate the following measures PD B Review of plans C 2 where feasible considering lot configuration, terrain, neighborhood aesthetics, and consistent with City standard to reduce energy use: • Plant shade trees to maximize cooling benefits and not interfere with solar panel installations(generally within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties). • Construct single-family residential units to be able to easily convert to solar power(i.e., solar ready). • Photovoltaic cells (solar panels) shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option. c� N • The residential units shall utilize techniques to minimize energy use and maximize ventilation to take advantage of sun/shade patterns and prevailing winds. e4` ' a"IGI'.,�.y rr,l II ISI irl �41'; itfl j!I,�4111d,1 a n._l ill y a^rr i�1r!'Ifr X41"'i Nlr °!"S', 1� Ir �lr +'�r� d.yir r! iii +4tl �a �!Y�.,V ar! 'iCUltufal.FfeSOUrCesrr.�,� i f a u a+ T k it �t� I�}„ rl 7 } L �� r�V� 'a.A R t"�M�' � �*,;{S,i i i � a ¢ 2•'+x!� r lt'u, 0 li i4 Y°(4{ r i.i:,,., i If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. 8of14 Mitigation . . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3l4 archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section PD BIC Review of A/D 3/4 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to Plans/Report eliminate adverse project effects on significant, During important, and unique prehistoric resources, Construction including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites,capping or covering site with soil, planning the w site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 9of14 Mitigation of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-Compliance Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare,identify, and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. .w.wr; ,..� r GBO)Ogy'2oflr)t$OIIS��� 'e�1 ,It f io ! - A :�.�.w.k... ..m[.�-:L..MFw.I ui:�l ii ,1 ilr ��v ,eu+..... a.=hi 4' Fi ti.u..;'titY The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PMjo construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM?a emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM?o emissions. 4 v - ,- - - v'S J�. s.3Y :Hazards and.VVaste?Materials(( r is z fa 'b a�Z;TU�.a:��,a' W" U2%±; 10 of 14 f Verified Sanctions for Mitigation . . . . . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequ I en,cy Verification Verification Date 11nitials Non-Compliance The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 California Building Code(CBC),which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters Hydrology and Water Quality �Eh .. . wn , Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to m the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 11 of 14 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequen cy Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by AEI CASC Consulting August 2009 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a rn minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 12 of 14 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. .0_, % t�X S r , t ,.,�pv F Eir:Vn.'j r YW 51 r:�[t! .-,f Si�hf '.r ii-L.-.?. a}--1 1`t}.i:i s W:.s i .v -t��i d'�tiY'�v^c' - '•.'.-.. Noose Il . j {E e..s..�i4ient�vi....�u..:,i .,u;.4iay, :-#._a�:��4[:3�o...z..:.t. ..+. ...Mr.3,.. :+.�L'vr.l4'+J S+ _-,.cFv at3:'X•in iX.Sr .'� ,�`,'r�"i�a.,su S.w..;,f... _•v ,.I�+..a..�,.-�.�7•t�aE%r.�=.�iar,�..s1iR. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a BO B Review of Plans C 2 construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Construction or grading shall not take place between BO C During A 4 the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed BO C During A 4 the standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the properly line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early PD C During A 2 as possible in the first phase. construction 13 of 14 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible . . of Method . Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations AM Responsible Person r fin:' "';ts, Mbnlfonng:Ffequericye-,, !'�Vle��irOd d#VeYificStion� 4t+ ris' .y Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 Withhold Recordation of Final Map c) PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit co CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP ' 7-Citation i:\planning\final\ceqa\mmchklst-rev12-4-06final.doc / 14 of 14 From: 01/09/2013 11 :53 #974 P.002/003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD CONTROL • LAND DEVELOPMENT&CONSTRUCTION . OPERATIONS • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT . SURVEYOR • TRANSPORTATION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Pr 825 East Third Street • San Bernardino,CA 92415.0835 • (909)387$1047 GERRY NEWCOMBE Fax (909)387-8130 Director of Public works January 8, 2013 City of Rancho Cucamonga File: 10(ENV)-4.01 Planning Department PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 RE: CEQA— NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TENTATIVE TRACT 18741 To whom it may concern: Thank you for giving the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. We received this request on December 17, 2012 and pursuant to our review, the following comments are provided: Water Resources Division (Grant Mann. P.E., Chief, (909) 387-8213): 1. It is assumed that the local agencies will establish adequate provisions for intercepting and • conducting accumulated drainage Flows around or through the improvement sites in a manner that will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 2. If any encroachment is anticipated on San Bernardino County Flood Control District (District) Right of Way, a permit must be obtained from the District's Flood Control Operations Division, Permit Section. Other on-site or off-site improvements may be required which cannot be determined at this time. Environmental Manaqement Division JBrandy Wood Ecological Snecialist (909) 387-7971): 1. Page 14 of the MND states "the 'occurrence probability' of the Burrowing Owl is 'absent as the 'vegetation is too dense with too many large shrubs.'" However, burrowing owls have been observed 0.75 mile away from the proposed project site in an area similarly vegetated. Furthermore, the project site is described within the MND as having 0.86 acres of Non-native grassland, a preferred habitat of burrowing owl. Protocol burrowing owl surveys need to be completed to ensure that the project proponent complies with all CEQA requirements addressing impacts to this species as well as does not violate California State law(Fish and Game Code § 1802 and Fish and Game Code 86, and prohibited by sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513). 2. The proposed project is located within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat(Dipodomys merriami parvus)(SBKR). SBKR is a federally endangered species and a State of California species • Bsh o:Supervisors GREGORY C.DEVEREAUX RDBEEi A. HERFORD.... ............First Dlshet JAMESRAM06............ ................Third D.strict A6'JICE RUTHERFORD..............SecpM Distnc! GARY C.OVITT ........ ..............._Fwdh District JDSIE GDNZALES............. ..........Fifth District EXHIBIT B G-99 From: 01 /09/2013 11 :54 #974 P.003/003 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Comments—Mitigated Negative Declaration • For Tentative Tract 18741 Page 2 of 2 of special concern. While not found during the project protocol surveys, the species was trapped within 0.5 mile of the project area in an area parallel to the project location with similar habitat in 2011. Additionally, the proposed project is adjacent to proposed mitigation lands established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. Consultation with the USFWS is required anytime a proposed action is likely to affect any listed species (Endangered Species Act, Section 10(a) (1)(B). To ensure during project related activities there are no impacts to SBKR, consultation with USFWS is needed. 3. Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub and Chamise chaparral, on-site vegetation types, are adapted and require the natural fire regime present in southern California. Furthermore, the proposed project is located adjacent to District land, set aside as mitigation established for the conservation of SBKR and California gnatcatcher. This land is covered with fire ` adapted vegetation and was not established to be modified for adjacent residential development. The MND does not identify the location of the required fire break required by City of Rancho Cucamonga, nor does it address the impacts of the establishment and maintenance of the fire/fuel break to ensure the safety of the community and how it will impact the adjacent habitat conservation land. This identification and impact analysis would be required in a complete CEQA analysis. 4. Page 33 Section 10 c of the MND states..."According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered • species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan." The project area is within United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated critical habitat for San Bemardino Kangaroo Rat, a federally endangered species and a State of California species of special concern. Furthermore, Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub, the vegetation present on-site is considered to be a sensitive plant community identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife(CDFW). Consultation with both agencies (USFWS and CDFW) is needed to address impacts to these sensitive biological resources. If you have any questions, please contact the individuals who provided the specific comment, as listed above. Sincere , ANNESLEY NATIUS, P.E. Deputy Director— Land Development & Construction ARI:PE:nh/CEQA Comments—MNDCity of Rancho Cucamonga_Centez Homes 010913 • (3100 • City of Rancho Cucamonga January 15,2013 Planning Department Attn: Mr. Steven Fowler PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 Response to Comments Mr. Fowler, This is in response to the Department of Public Works letter dated January 8,2013. Water Resource Division Comments 1. It is assumed that the local agencies will establish adequate provisions for intercepting and conducting accumulated drainage flows around or through the improvement sites in a manner that will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. Response: The site has designed interceptor drains on the north and west sides of the property to accept and transport around and through the storm drainage system for the project. Further flows are directed to water quality basins onsite that will filter and transport through storm drain connections the flows into established master storm drain facilities that exist today. The plans depict the drainage and flow capture as well as the eventual connection into the established storm drain facilities. • The comments regarding the assumption of the local agencies requirements establishing provisions is correct and has been implemented through the design of the facilities to support the project. Therefore there is no adverse impact to adjacent or downstream properties and no further mitigation is required. 2. If any encroachment is anticipated on San Bernardino County Flood Control District SBCFCD)Right of Way,a permit must be obtained from the District's Flood Control Operations Division,Permit Section. Other on-site or off-site improvements may be required which can not be determined at this time. Response: No encroachment on SBCFCD right of way is currently anticipated. In the event that some issue would necessitate encroachment then a permit application would be submitted and processed through the SBCFCD Operations Division,Permit Section. As stated above, the local agencies have established provisions for the improvements and no encroachment is anticipated. Therefore,no adverse impact is anticipated and no further mitigation is required. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the comments of the SBCFCD. If there are any questions,please contact me at 951-538-5835 -or email - ford523no verizon.net A d OEXHIBIT C G101 PT. RICHMOND I.SA ASSOCIATES. INC. BERKELEY FRESNO ROCKLI\ L15DO IOWA AVENUE. SUITE 200 951.791.9110 TEL CARLSBAD IRVINE SAS LUIS ODIsPo RI\'ERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92507 951.781.4277 FAX FORT COIJANS PALM SPRINGS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO • I i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 16, 2013 JAN 16 2013 Annesley Ignatius Deputy Director RECEIVED ' PLANNING Land Development and Construction San Bernardino County Department of Public Works 824 East Third Street San Bernardino, CA 92011 Subject: Response to Comments by Department of Public Works Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 18741 (LSA Project No. PI-IC 1201) I Dear Mr. Ignatius: Thank you for commenting on the above-referenced MND. Please find in the table below our response to the four comments from the San Bernardino County of Public Works Environmental Management Division in your letter to City of Rancho Cucamonga, dated January 8,2013. No. Comment Response/Action 1. Page 14 of the MND states"the Burrowing owls avoid nesting near trees and occurrence probability' of the large shrubs because these provide cover for Burrowing Owl is `absent' as the avian predators. They also avoid dense vegetation is too dense with too many vegetation because it blocks the view of large shrubs."'However,burrowing potential prey. Although burrowing owls may owls have been observed 0.75 mil away occasionally move through the area, they from the proposed project site in an area would not be expected to nest in such habitat. similarly vegetated. Furthermore, the The 0.86 acre of non-native grassland is project site is described within the MND adjacent to the intersection of Wilson Avenue as having 0.86 acres of Non-native and Wardman Bullock. It is highly disturbed grassland, a preferred habitat of and frequented by pedestrians. It was also burrowing owl. Protocol burrowing owl walked on many occasions by biologists surveys need to be completed to ensure conducting bird and mammal surveys. that the project proponent complies with Although this would be undesirable habitat all CEQA requirements addressing impacts to this species as well as does for burrowing owls due to the foot traffic and not violate California Slate law (Fish adjacent vehicle traffic, if owls had been and Game code Section 1802 and Fish Present, they would have been observed over and Game Code 86, and prohibited by the span of ninny site visits by biologists, i Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513). including site visits for California gnatcatcher surveys during which the entire site was 1/16113(R-tpnCl?ar\RespunscToConmlcntsUlND_RTC Gnnl.doc) • P I,ANN NO i ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES I DESIGN G102 LI., ,s Ga c ISn:b. I?C. • No. Comment Response/Action surveyed and all birds observed were noted. In addition, following standard Burrowing Owl Consortium protoeol, a 30-day preconstruction survey for burrowing owl will be conducted prior to grading as including in the CEQA conditions of approval and grading permit requirements. 2. The proposed project is located within Surveys for SBKR were conducted on the site Unites States Fish and Wildlife Service in 1998, 2001, 2008, and 2011. USFWS was (USFWS) designated critical habitat for notified of the surveys and appropriate San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat USFWS protocol was followed. All surveys (Dipodompr merriami prn•ras)(SBKR). were negative for SBKR. SBKR is a federally endangered species Consultation with USFWS for impacts to and a State of California species of critical habitat is required only when the special concern. While not found during project has a federal nexus.if the Army Corps the project protocol surveys, the species of Engineers (ACOS) determines that was trapped within 0.5 mile of the federally jurisdictional waters are present on project area in an area parallel to the the site, consultation with USFWS will be project location with similar habitat in conducted by ACOE. If federally 2011. Additionally,the proposed project jurisdictional waters are not determined to be • s adjacent to proposed mitigation lands present, the project will not have a federal established for the conservation of nexus and consultation for impacts to critical SBKR and California gnatcatcher. Consultation with the USFWS is habitat will not be required. required anytime a proposed action is Surveys for California gnatcatcher following likely to affect any listed species USFWS protocol in 2011 were negative. The (Endangered Species Act, Section USFWS was notified of the surveys and I0(a)(l)(B). to ensure during project presented with the results. Given that the related activities there are no impacts to results were negative, no consultation is SBKR, consultation with USFWS is required for impacts to this species. needed. 3. Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub and There is no need for the District land to be chamise chaparral, on-site vegetation modified in any manner. The fire protection j types, are adapted and require the plan (FPP) has been approved as an onsite natural fire regime present in southern plan. This is per PMT2012-02715 FPP as California.Furthermore, the proposed approved 1-08-20I3.This means that there is project is located adjacent to District no offsite need for a fire break or fael land,set aside as mitigation established modification. Thus there is no impact to the for the conservation of SBKR and adjacent habitat conservation land. California gnatcatcher.This land is As the site is adjacent to a conservation area, covered with fire adapted vegetation and an 8 ft. high block wall will be constructed on was not established to be modified for the site boundary next to the mitigation areas. adjacent residential development' The No offsite encroachment is needed or will be MND does not identify the location of requested to be utilized. This wall will the required fire break required by City rovide a barrier to resident and pet recess in 11I6/I3(UPIIC120NUt ,p,sO Co,n=m,\AlND_RTC_Gnatdoc) 2 G103 I..CA a95rC rr 1: INf: • No. Comment Response/Action of Rancho Cucamonga, nor does it addition to serving as an on-site fire-break; address the impacts of the establishment thus benefiting the conservation lands. and maintenance of the fire/fuel break to ensure the safety of the community and how it will impact the adjacent habitat conservation land.This identification and impact analysis would be required in a complete CEQA analysis. 4. Page 33 Section 10 c of the MND states, Mitigation has been provided for the RAFSS "According to General Plan Figure RC- as prescribed by the City of Rancho 4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan Cucamonga in the conditions of approval. FPEIR, the project site is not within an Please see pages 13 and 14 of the Initial area of sensitive biological resources; Study for this project. therefore,development will not See response to comment no. 2 for discussion adversely affect rare or endangered on SBKR. species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan." The project area is within USFWS designated critical habitat for SBKR. Furthermore, Riversidean alluvial fan • sage scrub, the vegetation present on- site is considered to be a sensitive plant community identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Consultation with both agencies is needed to address impacts to these sensitive biological resources. Please contact me if you require any additional information. i Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC, j /(Zc: Maria A. Lum Associate Biologist it I 1116113(R:\PITC12UI\RespanseToCnmmcnls\\1NI) RTC fimlLdoc) - - 3 G104 RESOLUTION NO.13-10 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741, A 53-LOT SUBDIVISION ON 40.12 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0226-081-05 AND 06. A. Recitals. 1. Steven Ford on behalf of Centex homes filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of January 2013, and continued to the 23rd day of January 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 9, and January 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, with a street frontage of 1,287 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,313 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site, is a partially built subdivision of single-family residences; the property to the south and east across Wardman Bullock Road, consists of existing single-family residences; and the property to the west, is the flood control basin; and C. The proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. All lots of the proposed subdivision meet the 20,000 square foot area minimum. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 • and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: G105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 2 • a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans as it meets the 25,000 square foot minimum average requirement for lot size in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan with the average lot being 25,325 square feet, and it has incorporated the themed architectural walls and entry points that are required in the same specific plan; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans as the application has incorporated equestrian trails and landscape improvements around the project site to meet the City requirements for; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed as it provides two points of access for ingress and egress into the site and the lot dimensions and sizes are consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat as potential environmental impacts have been analyzed and addressed in the Mitigated Negative declaration prepared for this document; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems as it is consistent with uses in the area and is consistent with the General Plan; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the • public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the • Mitigated Negative Declaration. G106 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 • Page 3 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The subdivision will be developed in accordance with the plans on-file in the Planning Department, as approved by the Planning Commission. 2) A reciprocal access easement for access onto the trail shall be • provided to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of a Grading Permit. 3) All retaining walls visible to public view shall be decorative and adhere to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Neighborhood Theme design requirements. 4) Provide a 5-foot minimum landscape area between the back of the sidewalk and 6-foot block wall on all corner lots. 5) Future house product for the subdivision shall adhere to the architectural requirements and guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Engineering Department 1) Wilson Avenue is to be constructed in accordance with the City "Modified Major Arterial with Median" standards and Figure 5-32 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan between Wardman Bullock Road and the west tract boundary as follows: • a) Install full width improvements, including south parkway, from Wardman Bullock Road to the west boundary of existing Tract G107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 4 14759. The City will provide funds collected from the developer • of Tract 14759 as a contribution in lieu of construction for their Wilson Avenue frontage improvements. b) Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, and access ramps on north side for entire project frontage. c) Remove the existing concrete ditch on the south side and provide curb, gutter, asphalt pavement, an 8-foot bike path, access ramps, and a 20-foot parkway community trail and LIVID landscaping from Wardman Bullock Road to the west boundary of existing Tract 14759. d) The design of permanent frontage improvements shall be coordinated with the City project to construct Wilson Avenue interim improvements between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, allowing smooth transitions of the horizontal alignment, curb lines, and of the ultimate centerline crown section. e) Pavement and striping transitions to be determined during plan check: (1)from west project limit of Tract 14759 on the south side of Wilson Avenue to join the existing pavement to the west within existing rights-of-way and (2) west of the west project boundary on the north side if right-of-way available. If right-of-way is not • available to the west, install barricades, signage, and striping to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f) Interim drainage improvements installed by the City project on the north side of Wilson Avenue will be removed. Off-site flows to those facilities shall be captured along the west tract boundary and/or at the west end of the permanent north side street improvements and directed to the storm drain system. g) If this tract develops prior to the City project to construct Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, install improvements sufficient to provide 2-way traffic from the west project boundary to East Avenue. h) Modify the Traffic Signal at Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road. i) Provide 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights. j) Provide additional traffic striping and signage, as required. k) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Wilson Avenue frontage. 1) Provide east-west 'Bike Lanes" in accordance with the City's General Plan. m) Provide left-turn lane for eastbound Wilson Avenue at Street A. Left-turn pocket shall be 100 feet in length. • n) Striping on Wilson Avenue shall line up with the existing striping on the east leg of Wardman Bullock Road intersection. G108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 5 • o) Eastbound left-turn pocket at Wardman Bullock Road shall be 200 feet in length. p) No residential driveways to Wilson Avenue. Provide a vehicle gate with a Knox box behind the drive approach for the Fire access and trail easement. q) Drive approach to be commercial type for fire access. 2) The developer shall receive fee credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the required Transportation Development Fee for permanent "backbone" improvements on Wilson Avenue in conformance with City policy, including modifications to the traffic signal and off-site right-of-way acquisition costs. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate. 3) A contribution in lieu of construction for the future landscaped median island in Wilson Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first. The amount of the contribution shall be one half the estimated cost of the median times the distance of the entire project frontage. • 4) Wardman Bullock Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, and access ramps. b) Provide 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. c) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. d) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Wardman Bullock Road frontage. e) No residential driveways to Wardman Bullock Road. Provide a vehicle gate with a Knox box behind the drive approach for the Fire access and trail easement. f) Drive approach to be Commercial type for fire access. 5) Tract 16324 has been conditioned to complete the west side of Wardman Bullock Road from Wilson Avenue to their south project boundary. Improvements will include curb and gutter, asphalt pavement and 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. If Tract 16324 constructs these improvements, that developer is eligible to request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of off-site improvements from future development of adjacent property. a) If Tract 16324 constructs the above mentioned improvements, this development will be required to reimburse Tract 16324 for • the improvements fronting SUBTT18741. G109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 6 6) All on-site streets to be improved in accordance with City"Local Street" • standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, street trees, access ramps, and drive approaches. b) Drive approach widths for 1 or 2-car garages shall not exceed 16 feet through public rights-of-way. c) Provide 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. d) Provide traffic striping and signage. 7) The entry treatments shall be per Exhibit 27 (A), page III-84, of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Provide necessary easements on the final map. 8) Landscape Maintenance District(LIVID)improvements shall be installed on Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, only. Side yards of Lots 1 and 53, along Street F. shall be privately maintained by those homeowners or the HOA. 9) Typically a perimeter wall separates LIVID improvements from private local trails. If the open fencing proposal shown in sections G through H is approved, prevent private runoff from the trail and adjacent private slopes from entering the LIVID area. Slopes above the private trails shall be HOA maintained. • 10) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent,water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices. 11) Provide residential drive approaches for access to private local trails from interior local streets only. Where perimeter trails cross the entrance roads, provide "step through" to prevent vehicular access. All concrete within trails, including drive approaches, should be medium broom finish. 12) The proposal to discharge public street runoff to WQMP basins is a concept that is acceptable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WQMP basins shall be HOA maintained. 13) The site is located within Area 14 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Regional and Master Plan facilities have been constructed by others, so drainage fees will be collected. 14) A Final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building • Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. G110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 7 • a) All public storm drainage facilities shall be shown on the public street improvement plans including, but not limited to, storm drains in Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, catch basins and laterals in Streets A, B, and C, and the basin in Lot A which shall be labeled "private maintenance." b) On Wilson Avenue, provide catch basins on the north side west of Street A and on the south side west of Wardman Bullock Road. Connect both private drainage facilities to the most westerly catch basin on Wilson Avenue. c) On Wardman Bullock Road, provide a catch basin on the west side south of the basin in Lot B. Connect both private drainage facility from the basin in Lot B to the catch basin. 15) Drainage facilities on private property, orwithin public rights-of-way that only collect runoff from private property, are private drainage facilities. These facilities shall be HOA-maintained. Connect private drainage facilities to catch basins, curbside drain outlets, or manholes. Grading 1) Along the west property line, a concrete channel (Section A2-A2) ends at a circle. This circle is not defined in the legend and is presumed to • be an inlet structure. Prior to issuance of Grading Permit: All inlet structures shall be sized to accept 100-year storm flows. A Hydrology and Hydraulics Report shall be provided to the Building and Safety Services Director, or his designee, for review and approval. 2) All slopes within the Landscape Maintenance District(LMD) areas shall meet the requirements of the Engineering Services Department. Any required changes to the site layout to meet the LMD requirements shall be reviewed by the Planning Department to determine if the final site layout is in substantial conformance to the publicly reviewed plans. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, all LMD slopes and site layout changes shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department and the Planning Department., 3) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, all street sections shall meet the requirements of the Engineering Services Department. 4) All proposed on-site basins shall be privately maintained by a Homeowners Association. 5) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit: The applicant shall submit a copy of the Codes, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to the Engineering Services Department for approval. In addition a copy of the CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for review with the maintenance requirements of the • proposed basins highlighted for easy reference. G111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 8 6) Priorto issuance of a Building Permit: All driveways shall meet City • requirements and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 7) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit: Should the pad elevations shown on the permitted grading plans differ significantly from the Conceptual Grading Plans, the Building and Safety Services Department will make a request to the Planning Department to determine if the permitted set of Grading Plans is in substantial conformance to the conceptual set of Grading Plans approved during the public hearing process. A scan of the conceptual grading plan shows that some pads may be low and that some driveways may exceed a slope of 10 percent. Additional reviews to determine if the final plan is in substantial conformance or meets other City codes may be required during the permitting process. 8) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit: The applicant shall submit a corrected Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for review and approval by the Building and Safety Services Director, or his designee. 9) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit: the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). This number shall be shown on the cover sheet of all permitted grading plans. 10) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to • constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 11) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit: The applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's"Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan" for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 12) In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50 feet 6% to 8.99% 40 feet 9% to 11.99% 30 feet 12% and greater 20 feet • G112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 9 • 13) All slope off-sets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 14) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit: The Grading Plan shall show a cross section through Lot 28. In addition, the applicant shall submit the grading plans to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District(SBCFCD)for review and comment regarding the re-grading of the existing levee. All comments provided by the SBCFCD shall be provided to the Building and Safety Services Director, or his designee, for review. A copy of all hydrology/hydraulic reports presented to SBCFCD for their review shall also be provided for review and approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department and the Building and Safety Services Department. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) During project construction, construction equipment shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. • Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. G113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 10 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed • excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 • hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) During export of soil, there shall be a maximum of 500 truck-hauling miles per day. In addition, during each day of site grading, one of the following shall be complied with: • Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet or hours of operation to a maximum total of 11,226 horsepower hours per day(the sum of each equipment's horsepower multiplied by the hours in operation per day). • All off-road equipment shall utilize Tier 2 engines or better. Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet or hours of operation to a maximum total of 13,890 horsepower hours per day. • All off-road equipment shall utilize Tier 3 engines or better. Reduce the onsite grading equipment fleet hours of operation to a maximum total of 22,712 horsepower hours per day. • A combination of onsite equipment and hours with onsite nitrogen • oxides (NOx) emissions less than 81.2 pounds per day. G114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT.18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 11 • 11) During project construction, the developer shall prohibit on-site construction equipment from idling for more than 5 minutes in any one hour. 12) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 13) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 16) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on • or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 38.24 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank) at a minimum of the equivalent to 38.24 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a rough Grading Permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. 2) The project applicant shall prepare a Plummer's mariposa lily mitigation plan prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. The plan shall consist of transplantation or other methods of removal including "set aside" and transplantation at a receiver site(s), bulb collection, or bulb augmentation within a greenhouse for future transplantation under the direction of a qualified restoration ecologist. The receiver site(s) shall be ecologically suitable and shall include the recordation of a conservation easement or deed restriction. 3) The developer shall purchase and preserve a minimum of 38.24 acres of suitable off-site mitigation land to be accepted by a qualified • management entity/agency or the payment of in-lieu fees (mitigation credits in a qualified mitigation bank) at a minimum of the equivalent to 38.24 acres to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the G115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 12 Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub prior to obtaining issuance of a • rough grading permit. The developer shall provide evidence of applicable mitigation fulfillment. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric • resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, • divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the G116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 13 • discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such • episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. G117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 14 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged • for the construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. • 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 11) To conserve water, the following measures shall be implemented into the site design, to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: • The project shall comply with City Efficient Landscape Ordinance, regardless of the size of the landscaped area. • Implement water conservation measures to provide at least a 15 percent reduction in water consumption beyond that required by regulation. • The homebuyer shall be provided with local resources on • drought-tolerant plants to be used for landscaping. G118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 15 • Do not impose minimum grass/turf amounts anywhere on the project site. • Require the landscape palette to provide a minimum of 40 percent drought-resistant species and to offer landscape design that excludes turf/grass. • Install low flow appliances (i.e., toilets, dishwashers, shower heads, washing machines, etc.). 12) The project shall comply with voluntary energy efficiency measures included in one of the following programs or other program approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Neighborhood Development certification (the most recent version), Green Point Rating, or CalGreen (the mandatory measures and a minimum of three residential Tier 1 and or Tier 2 voluntary measures). Verification of certification/ compliance shall be submitted to the City pursuant to City requirements. 13) The project shall incorporate the following measures where feasible considering lot configuration, terrain, neighborhood aesthetics, and consistent with City standard to reduce energy use: • • Plant shade trees to maximize cooling benefits and not interfere with solar panel installations (generally within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of properties). • Construct single-family residential units to be able to easily convert to solar power (i.e., solar ready). • Photovoltaic cells (solar panels) shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option. • The residential units shall utilize techniques to minimize energy use and maximize ventilation to take advantage of sun/shade patterns and prevailing winds. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildand-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. Hydrology and Water Quality • 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices G119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 16 • (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by AEI-CASC Consulting,August 2009 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. • 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NO])to comply with obtaining coverage under G120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 17 • the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior. 1) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. Interior. 2) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. • 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation • plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. G121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-10 SUBTT 18741 - CENTEX HOMES January 23, 2013 Page 18 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • G122 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT18741 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: CENTEX HOMES NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE — LOCATION: APN: 0226-081-05 AND 06. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 40. 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-10, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,206.25 X B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning • Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 1 G123 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_• site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State I-1— State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For • single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 11. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles,such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 12. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official 13. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. • 2 G124 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 14. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate • fencing. 15. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6 foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split- face double sided block, 'slump stone'or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee, 16. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning.requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 17, The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers 6n or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 18. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solarenergy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision • which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 20. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 21. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 22. Construct block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 23. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 24. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 25. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. • 3 G125 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 26. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning • Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 27. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 28. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 29. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. D. Building Design 1. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or • ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 3. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All two-car garage parking spaces shall be a minimum 20 feet wide by 20 feet long interior dimensions free and clear. One-car Garages shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide by 20 feet long interior dimensions free and clear. 2. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. —/—I— F Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. • 4 G126 Project No.SUBTT18741 completion Date 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion • control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • 5 G127 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 4. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final • occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 5. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shalt discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 6. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, • FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan, d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT18741)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 6 G128 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT18741). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Priorto issuance of occupancy for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map • recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. K. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 4. All structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and the 2010 California Residential Code (CRC). L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. • 7 G129 Project No.SUBTr18741 Completion Date 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. S. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage_acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. • 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond project boundary. 16. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". • 8 G130 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 18, Grading Inspections. . a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre- grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit, iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. • 20. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 21. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. M. Additional Requirements/Comments — Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's"Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 2. An updated water quality management plan was provided with this submittal. The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by AEI-CASC Consulting dated September 5, 2008 (Revision #1 dated August 2009 and Revision #2 dated August 2012) has been reviewed and deemed "Substantially Complete" dated September 18, 2012". The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: • 9 G131 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date Page Section Item 1-3 1.3.5' A reference is made to Exhibit B. Please check your references. Could this be referring to Exhibit C7 • 2-2 Table 2-1 For"Oz Demanding Substances" and"Oil and Grease" a reference is made to "Potential". Please check your references. Could this be "Expected"? If it is "Potential" please provide an explanation. 3-4 3.1.2.3 The statement is "The project will utilize vegetated swales within landscaped areas on lots." Please provide a detail of the vegetated swale and a typical location on the lot. 3-5 3.1.2.4 The statement is "The project will utilize underground drainage facilities that discharge into a retention basin prior to entering the existing storm drain system." Please provide a detail of the underground drainage facilities if they are considered BMP devices. Are these facilities storm drain lines or perforated piping for infiltration. This statement is confusing. 3-7 3.2.1.2 A statement is made"A copy of the COA's will be included in Attachment D."This document will be approved when the Conditions of Approval are included in this document. In addition, please include a copy of the Condition's, Codes and Restrictions in Attachment D. 3-8 3.2.1.11 A statement reads"Approximate locations of slopes and/or lot swales are shown on the WQMP Drawing, Exhibit C in Attachment A."Please provide a detail of the lot swales and a typical location on the lot. 3-12 Table 3-3 A reference is made"(identified by a yellow outline in Table 3-3)".This table was not highlighted. Treatment Control BMP's are not noted in this table. Please correct this. 4-3 4.3 Please include the title of the person. This will allow City Staff to contact the correct individual when personnel changes occur. For the "Post Construction" information please provide this information. This information should be available when the CC&R's are prepared for Attachment D. 5-1 5 Please include the title of the person. This will allow City Staff to contact the • correct individual when personnel changes occur. In addition please provide a map showing areas 1 through 5. 6-2 6 Please check the Assessor's Parcel Number. 6 6 The City of Rancho Cucamonga "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan Agreement"; the following items may be added to the agreement: File—please add the civil engineer of record's file number here • Prepared By — please add the engineering company here which prepared this document • Checked By — please add the initials of the engineer which prepared this document Assessor's Parcel Number— please add the APN here Please add the project number"SUBTT18741" Attachment Please include a copy of the Conditions of Approval and the CC&R's (Codes, D Conditions & Restrictions). This Water Quality Management Plan will be approved after these documents are included. The WQMP BMP exhibit shall include details of all proposed BMP's including the landscape swale. The WQMP BMP exhibit shall include an inspection and maintenance schedule of all proposed BMP devices. 10 • G132 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date Please include a copy of the Conditions of Approval and the CC&R's(Codes, Conditions&Restrictions).This _!_/_ Water Quality Management Plan will be approved after these documents are included. 0 h WQMP BMP exhibit shall include details of all proposed BMP's including the landscape swale. The WQMP BMP exhibit shall include an inspection and maintenance schedule of all proposed BMP devices. 3. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document shall be in the format and meet the requirements of the current adopted WQMP at the time of approval of the WQMP document and when the City's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" is recorded. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, streettrees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 49 to 70 total feet on Wilson Avenue 33 total feet on Wardman Bullock Road • 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map. 6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: Wilson Avenue, west of the west tract boundary. O. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. • 11 G133 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and • ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing morethan one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Wilson Avenue X X (c) X X X Wardman Bullock Road X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, streetlights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be • posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed. in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit,and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduitwith pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. 12 • G134 Project No.SUBTT18741 Comoletion Date f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. Acash • deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Ecommon Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Wilson Avenue Geijera parviflora Austrailian Willow 5' 45' 0.C. 15 Gal Fill North Side Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 8' 70' O.C. 15 Gal in Lagerstroemia hybrid Crape Myrtle— 2' 35' 0.C. 24" "Muskogee" Lavender Box • Median Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 3' 40' 0.C. 15 Gal Fill Lagerstroemia hybrid Crape Myrtle— 2' 35' O.C. 24" in "Muskogee" Lavender Box Wardman Bullock 60% Geijera Austrailian Willow 5' 45' O.C. 15 Gal Fill Road parviflora London Plane Tree 7' 60' O.C. 15 Gal in 30% Platanus acerifolia Accent Lagerstroemia hybrid Crape Myrtle—White 2' 360.C. 24" Fill "Natchez" Box in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be • 13 G135 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos,easements,trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape • Maintenance District: Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road LMD Improvements 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas(40%)of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be,the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone"X"designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. R. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 14 • G136 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. S. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Hardware • 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. U. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. V. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. • 15 G137 Project No.SUBTT18741 Completion Date W. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_0 visibility. X. Alarm Systems 1. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 16 G138 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District a Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS Centex Homes TRACT 18741 53 SFR Lots VHFHSZ SUBTT18741 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT; SPECIFIC REGULATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SUBDIVISION, CAN ALSO BE FOUND IN THE APPROVED FIRE PROTECTION PLAN FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply The design for Fire Hydrant spacing and location shall comply with the RCFPD Standard 5-10 and CVWD's current standard. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is determined in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public Water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto. the site. Building permits for the construction of the homes will not be issued until the public water plans are approved by FCS and CVWD. 3. On the site plans to be submitted for plan check, show all fire hydrants available to the proposed site. FSC-3 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems The 2010 California Residential Code and the approved fire protection plan require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in all structures in accordance with the 2010 edition of NFPA 13D or the current edition as adopted by the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Please reference the Fire protection Plan for details of the regulation. FSC-4 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads; streets and highways, horse trails, streets and/or any area designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access — Fire Lanes Standard 5-1. 1. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-3. 2. Fire lanes on public streets do not need to be identified. C aw 1,947 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-5 Hazardous Fire Area This project is located within the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FCS-6 Fire Protection Plans: The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the approved fire protection plan for the community, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50, the 2010 California Building Code chapter 7A and RCFPD Standard 49-1. 1. FCS-7 Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. C. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting, or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding, or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FCS-8 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, Fire Protection Plan requirements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. FSC-9 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-10 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 2 � . iyo The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that regulate parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. FCS-11 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be noncombustible internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness with non combustible fixtures. The numbers shall be visible from the street. FCS-12 Landscaping: The lots must be landscaped with the required vegetation in accordance with approved landscape plans. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits 3 r ! -.i Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 Agenda • Site Utilization • Zoning • Tract Map • Walls , Monuments & Entry Portals • Committees • Corrections • Recommendation 4 I 1 ■ mmmt_ '� i s9 I i i� co Ai I' I W I I I I I I low jj Zoning • Very Low Residential • Etiwanda North Specific Plan • Etiwanda Highlands themed neighborhood Standard Requirements • 25 , 000 Square Foot Minimum Net Average Lot Size • 20 , 000 Square Foot Minimum Net Lot Size • 150 foot Minimum Depth • 90 foot Minimum Width , 100 foot Minimum width at corners i Tract Map TiM&.7T VE TRACT MAP%YO 18741 IMPO - tj �• �� � �� i. ,� �� �, � _�' r .f � v � �� ' � 1 . 3 maw bm��_ �,_.. _ �_..-. Will Y _ �! SV/I[Sltll11 -._51 •-.�\ \ `� �����!v� r y�...'�"l'.�� � . :--.J' � .MdYPe( �- /-`. -1'` •9 5(- . — e f%V(Jl',l�V .y_M • - • �, � : , � ,, 1 3 ��;_ �ti � r` � , t �, ' � �� ", ��- � ri �. ... r `� � _ ,�. �F � �,. � ,� � � � I,^OVl) �'�� ^ ' � _ - G /� �� J ��� a";te� � `, / �< . ��: !WIN" Committees • Passed a I I committees • Trails Advisory Committee recommends access to the trails along the north boundary be granted to project to the north to allow access to the Community Trail System . „ .; � � ��, `�„ ' � �, �� ���� ,��- �.� � K' �'f 1� ��! � � . �r �i'�R ��t�^�� �sy �. a �. �/ i �I :,��.� �_ � 'r __ .�..� �� � �� �; � ' r' . 7, C=— �: � d �� � i r, �`, ♦d 1� 5 .F � � � �w �p� lr � .lf� �,C” 4F.1'lllfl l`l .C 1 OY' - 1 _� Environmental Assessment A,�BO.i�!iU • A letter was received from San Bernardino County Department of Public Works on January 9th , expressing concerns about drainage and biological resources . • To allow time for the applicants to prepare a response , staff requested a continuance of the public hearing to the January 23rd meeting date. • The applicant's environmental consultants have responded and determined that no further mitigation is needed . MINOR Correction • A typographical error occurred in several places within the Initial Study document. It states 53 lots with 51 are being processed as single-family residential lots. It should read 55 lots in place of the 53 and 53 lots in place of the 51 . • This occurs on Pages 1 , 26, & 39 • On pages 23 and 36 of the document it is described as 51 single-family residences and it should be 53. • All of the studies and traffic counts were analyzed with 53 single-family residences. Igo Recommendation • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18741 with conditions and adopt the Initial Study with Mitigation Measures SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 23, 2013 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS r� H/ J7f UPDATE REGARDING THE CHINATOWN HOUSE LOCATED AT 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD. AN ORAL REPORT WILL BE GIVEN AT THE MEETING.