Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-06-10 - SupplementalsCity of Rancho Cucamonga SAN SEVAI N E TRAIL PROJECT Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Services Department June 10, 2020 Vicinity Map �V J/��vl• Continue - above right - Continue - below left LEGEND SAN SEVAINE MU PHASING „ sPHASE _ LOVER AVE. — EX61ING SEGMENT j +� SEGMENT i _ < —SEGMENT7 ac SA A "'•'SFCiEAtNl ;1 PHASE —.PHASE u OIHEE REGIONAL TRARS .XISTING CUSS I PATH -.ORCPOSEDCLASS IPATH s• or roN*n Nn _ N J11fNIYFr O OYYY AM1r 12N Background • City of Fontana awarded two State grants • Earlier Trails Advisory Committee Meetings • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Typical Design Layout ,{ RFIM CITY OF RM1CH0 QKAMOWA - - - - - - - - - - - WAIL H-4' /' EOOESTilN! TRAIL EXPN I V iMi0PO5E0 NULTWSE TR& " �, rl'�E RETNFMG " -----� % K_----_Q•F Designing Multi -Purpose Trail • Constructing a 4-foot-high retaining wall • Investigating re -use for elevated equestrian trail • Avoids demolishing the retaining wall in the future Design Underneath the SR-210 Freeway � w t i o co W N r O f � U) I -RXE'B.1ENi '� A �BMOS ABUIIENT -- - Gp 1 I B r �MGE AMENT , x h it -s CY „lo 51 }Q'J 4 brc PROPOSED VNN-BLE—/ '-70P n6 c2(10 „ HEIGHT REFANN: WALL OF - . CHANNEL TOP W CHANNEL A TOP OF rw cF TOP CF CHMEI TwNE _auaNn - B 1 O N V) I f i 9D TE-ea I FETB;!E DE-BACN IMB' WALL, H=IA' Al Sm rxrxEt Constraint Beneath the SR-210 Freeway • Bridge abutment conflict • Inadequate width for an equestrian trai • Funding limited to pedestrians and bicycles • Combine trail uses for a 200-foot stretch HORIZONTAL DISTANCE PER PLAN I, L FWY-EB TO 615 NB------_ __ I -A ---SR-210 EXIST. BRIDKIE SIiliJ / / 1&5 I 25' 16' PROPOSED MULTI -PURPOSE TRAIL I I \, I•.•I �� II \\ II \\ u. MAXIMUM , , l P0.55. WIDTH PROPOSED LJ V TIE -BACK WALL TIE -BACK WALL W=2'; H=14' W=2'; H=V SECTION B-B ETIWANUA Recommendations Option 1— Provide concurrence that the trail improvements submitted meets City's MOU. Option 2 — Provide concurrence that the trail improvements submitted with design of 4-foot high retaining wall for an elevated equestrian trail in the future meets the City's MOU. Option 3 — Determine that the trail improvements do not meet City's MOU and recommend City Council to rescind City's participation and direct Fontana to stop trail improvements outside city limits. Option 4 — Recommend the City Council to appropriate additional funds necessary to construct full trail improvements. Note, City funding to proceed with this oation has not been identified. Questions?