HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/10/27 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 27, 1999 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chamber
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman McNiel __ Vice Chairman Macias __
Com. Mannedno __ Com. Stewart __ Com. Tolstoy __
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
September 29, 1999, Adjourned Special Meeting
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice
their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman
and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after
speaking.
A. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDTENTATIVETRACT14759-
RANCHO SUMMIT - The proposed subdivision of 132 acres of land
into 358 single family lots and 3 lettered lots for common open
space/parks totaling 28.7 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4
dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the
east and west sides of Wardman Bullock Road, north and south of
Summit Avenue - APN: 226-102-17. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued
from September 29, 1999)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 13796 - LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP.
- A request for an extension of a previously approved tentative tract
map including design review for the development of 111 condominium
units on 7.92 acres of land in the Medium Residential designation (8-
14 units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on
the south side of Mountain View Ddve, east of Milliken Avenue -
APN: 227-151-32. (VVITHDRAWN)
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT
NO.15993-WESTERNpACIFICHOUSING-Aresidentialsubdivision
of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoda
Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road
and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-21 through 24. Related
File: Development Review 99-45. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING - The design review of
building elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract map
15993, consisting of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the
Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the
Victoria Community Plan, located on the nodhwest corner of Base
Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-21 through 24.
Related File: Tentative Tract 15993. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14038 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
- A request for an extension and modification of the standard
conditions of approval of a previously approved tentative parcel map
for the subdivision of 2.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan,
located at the northeast comer of Arrow Route and Maple Place -
APN: 208-961-11. Related files: Development Review 99-33 and
Vadance 99-08. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
F. VARIANCE 99-08 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS - A request t0 reduce
the required 5-foot interior rear building setback to zero feet for a new
industrial building on 2.4 acres of land in the General Industrial District
(Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
northeast corner of Arrow Route and Maple Place - APN: 208-961-11.
Related files: Development Review 99-33 and Parcel Map 14038.
Page 2
V. NEW BUSINESS
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS - The development of four
industrial buildings totaling 49,930 square feet on 2.4 acres of land in
the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer of Arrow Route and
Maple Place -APN: 208-961-11. Related files: Variance 99-08 and
Parcel Map 14038~ Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration.
VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
H. USE DETERMINATION 99-04 MENNONITE CENTRAL
COMMITTEE THRIFT STORE - A request to determine that a second-
hand store is similar to General Retail Store, which is a permitted use
within the Neighborhood Commercial District of the Development
Code.
VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place forthe general public to address the Commission. Items
to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
VIII, COMMISSION BUSINESS
I. TRAIL PRIORITIES
J. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - Oral report
IX. ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
11:00p. m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, the y shall be heard only
with the consent of the Commission.
I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a tree, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on October 21, 1999, at least 72 hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center
D~ve, Rancho Cucamonga.
/
Page 3
VICINITY MAP
· k CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer ~'~~
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 -
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING, OCTOBER 27, 199% AGENDA
ITEM "A"
The Engineering Division has reviewed some concems relating to Proposition 218 and the forming
of landscape maintenance district for the subject development. The City's assessment district
consultant has raised a few issues which need to be presented to the Developer. Staff has not had
the opportunity to fully discuss these issues with the Developer and the impacts they may have on
the conditions of approval.
The Engineering Division requests the public heating be continued to November 10, 1999.
DJ:sd
c: Brad Buller, City Planner
October 27. 1999
Planning Commission
City ofRa~oho Cucamonga
10S(K} Civi~ Cenm-Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
SUBJECt; TRACT 147~9, RANClIO SUMiVlIT, PLAN/~NG COMMISSION [~UBLIC HEARING
Dear Commissioners:
On behelf of the Lennar Homes project team, we are looking forward to reviewing ~ project
with you, We feel the project is exemplary and provides many amenities that will be of value to
the commun/ty.
We understand that for this evening's meeting the Englnefling Department is recommending the
public hearing b¢ continued for two weeks to research additional items on the project. We concur
with the continuance and will attend your next meeting. We look forward to reviewing this
project with you at that time.
Pamela Steele
Principal
Cc'. Brent LeC..Ount, Planning Department
Project Team
I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA
St3ffRe rt
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 -
RANCHO SUMMIT- The proposed subdivision of 132 acres of land into
358 single family lots and 3 lettered lots for common open space/parks
totaling 18.3 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east and west sides of
Wardman Bullock Road, north and south of Summit Avenue
APN: 226-102-17.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission continued the September 29, 1999,
meeting on the subject project to allow the applicant time to respond to a letter from the
California Department of Fish and Game (DFG). The September 21, 1999, DFG letter
(Exhibit "A") made several unsubstantiated claims regarding supposed environmental
impacts associated with the project. No actual evidence of impacts was provided.
Nevertheless, the applicanrs biologist has conducted exhaustive analysis of the issues
raised by DFG and provided fact-based responses to the DFG letter. Staff believes the
applicant has addressed all pertinent issues. Please refer to the attached applicant's
response (Exhibit "B") dated October 14, 1999, for further details. Note that the
applicant's response includes excerpts from the DFG letter with responses adjacent to
the right. On October 18 staff received an undated letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Exhibit "D"). Staff has read this letter and continues to find the applicant's
response adequately addresses all pertinent issues.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The applicant has completed Part I of the Initial
Study and staff has completed Part II. Supplemental information provided by the
applicanrs biologist in response to DFG claims has been added to the discussion
portion of the Initial Study. With implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in
ITEPI A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
']'I' 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
October 27. 1999
Page 2
the attached Initial Study and Resolution of Approval, all potential impacts associated
with the project can be mitigated to a less than significant level. If the Planning
Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in
order.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Tentative Tract 14759 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with
conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BLC~Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Department of Fish and Game dated September
21, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Letter from Applicant dated October 14, 1999
Exhibit "C"- Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 22,
1999
Exhibit "D" - Letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service received October
18, 1999
Exhibit "E" - Revised Initial Study Part II
Resolution of Approval with conditions and Mitigation Monitoring Plan
STATE OF CAUFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAV~, Govenlot
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Eastem Sierra - Inland Deserts Region (~
4775 Bird Farm Road
Chino Hills, California 91709
(909) 393-0635
September21, 1999 R EC E I V E D
SEP ~, 3 1999
City of Rancho Cucamonga City ot Rancho Cucarnon~
Rannin0 Division
Planning Division
P.O, Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attn: Brent LeCount
Re: Negative Declaration
Tentative Tract 14759 - Rancho Summit
Dear Mr. LeCount:
The Califomia Department of Fish and Game (Department) thanks you for the
opportunity to comment on the Environmental Assessment.
The Department has reviewed the Negative Declaration and concluded that the project,
as proposed, does pose significant adverse impacts to sensitive biological resources,
that a negative declaration is not appropriate and that preparation of an environmental
impact report is warranted. The Department is commenting as both a Responsible and
a Trustee Agency. The text of this letter documents why the Department believes an
environmental impact report (EIR) is warranted.
The proposed development consists of the subdivision of 132 acres of land into 358
single family lots and three open spaca lots. The project site contains 18.8 acres of
undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), 20.36 acres of disturbed
RAFSS, and 23.32 acres of buckwheat scrub. The applicant is proposing to provide
off-site mitigation on a 1:1 ratio for the loss of the 18.8 acres of RAFSS. All native plant
communities are proposed for removal.
Department of Fish and Game Mandate
The Fish and Game Code (Code) provides the authority for the Department t'o operate :
as a state agency. Section 1801 of Chapter 8 of the Code discusses the Department
policies and objectives governing the conservation of wildlife resources. It states:
2
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
It is hereby declared to be the policy of the state to encourage the preservation,
conservation, and maintenance of wildlife resources under the jurisdiction and
influence of the state, This policy includes the following objectives:
(1) To maintain sufficient populations of all species of wildlife and the habitat
necessary to achieve the objectives stated in subdivisions (b), (c), and
(d).
(2) To provide for the beneficial use and enjoyment of wildlife by all citizens
of the state,
(3) To perpetuate all species of wildlife for their intrinsic and ecological
values, as well as for their direct benefits to all persons.
(4) To provide for aesthetic, educational, and non-appropriative uses of the
various wildlife species.
The Code clearly defines the jurisdiction of the Department of Fish and Game and the
role of the Department in the CEQA process, in Section 1802, which states:
The Department has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection and
management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically
sustainable populations of those species, The Department, as trustee for fish
and wildlife resources, shall consult with lead and responsible a.qencies and
shall provide, as available, the requisite biolo.qical expertise to review and
comment upon environmental documents and impacts arisin.q from project
activities, as those terms are used in the California Environmental Protection Act
(Division 13, commencing with Section 21000 of the Public Resources Code)
[emphasis added]
California Environmental Quality Act
Section 15002 of the CEQA guidelines defines the basic purposes of CEQA as follows:
(1) Inform governmental decision makers and the public about the
potential, significant environmental effects of proposed activities,
(2) Identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or
significantly reduced.
(3) Prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by
requiring changes in projects through the use of alternatives or
mitigation measures when the governmental agency finds the
changes to be feasible.
(4) Disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
approved the project in the manner the agency chose if significant
environmental effects are involved.
The crux of this legislation is that the Department is a trustee and/or responsible
agency under California law and has '...jurisdiction over the conservation, protection
and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically
sustainable populations of those species.' It is clear from the Code that the
Department, as a trustee agency, also has an important advisory role in the CEQA
process by supplying the biological expertise to review and comment upon
environmental documents and project impacts. as stated above. This is our legal
jurisdiction mandated in CEQA and forms the basis for our comments.
In addition, the Department is a Responsible Agency because the project may involve
impacts to streambeds. thereby triggering the necessity for a 1601-1603 Streambed
Alteration Agreement.
The purpose of this letter is to: 1 ) examine the adequacy of the negative declaration
under the information requirements of CEQA, 2) examine how the project identifies way
to avoid or substantially reduce adverse impacts on the environment, 3) examine how
the project proponent reduces the impacts of the project on the environment through
avoidance, alternatives and mitigation measures, and 4) examine the lead agency's
rationale for choosing a negative declaration.
Informational Content
Streambed Alteration Aqreement -The biological report prepared by LSA on July 14,
1999 states:
A wetland and jurisdictional delineation for the purpose of determining the limits
of any waters subject to jurisdiction by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and Califomia Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG), under Sections 1601-1603 of the California Fish and Game
Code, would be required to determine whether or not at least the two primary
drainages crossing the site qualify as jurisdictional waters.
Potential impacts to waters of the United States, wetlands or jurisdictional streambeds
should be determined during the CEQA process, not following it. If a 1601-1603
Streambed Alteration Agreement is required then the Department becomes a
Responsible Agency under CEQA. How can the public or this Department analyze the
proposed impacts of a project if the lead agency does not know what those impacts
are? Without knowing what impacts the proposed development Will have on.
jurisdictional streambeds, the Department cannot assess the impacts or recommend
alternatives or mitigation measures. Furthermore, how can the lead agency issue a
negative declaration for a project which requires further regulatory action when the lead
4
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
agency does not know what those impacts are or how they will be mitigated for?
If the negative declaration is the end process of CEQA and subsequently the
Department does require a Streambed Alteration Agreement, the Department will have
no CEQA certified information upon which to base an agreement on. If the Department
does not have the information it requires to issue a 1601-1603 Streambed Alteration
Agreement through the City's CEQA process, the Department may have no choice but
to assert lead agency status.
In conclusion, the fact that a Streambed Alteration Agreement or other regulatory
compliance may be required does not relieve the lead agency of the responsibility
under CEQA for informing the public of what specific impacts the proposed
development will have on the environment and including specific mitigation measures
to reduce those impacts to a level of insignificance. Other informational gaps are
discussed throughout the text of this letter.
Habitat Linkaqe - The Initial Study includes the following statement concerning habitat
linkages:
The site may function to some degree as a habitat linkage but construction of the
Route 30 Freeway to the south would prevent future linkage value of the site.
Furthermore, the site is surrounded to the south and west by open space/flood
control improvements which could continue to provide a habitat linkage in the
area. The impact is not considered significant.
The Biologicel Report prepared by LSA on July 14, 1999 does not include a discussion
of habitat linkages. There was no discussion of adjoining habitat areas or the
discussion of the value of portions of the site for regional habitat. Neither was there a
discussion of the importance of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub as a very
threatened plant community or the usefullness of disturbed RAFSS habitat for wildlife.
The biological report does state that the disturbed RAFSS could be utilized by
gnatcatchers. However, the biological study did not include the criteria for determining
what is undisturbed and what is disturbed RAFSS. The Negative Declaration also did
not include a discussion of the relative medts of maintaining habitat on-site versus off-
site mitigation. The Department believes that these are all issues which should be
addressed in the context of an Environmental Impact Report, not a mitigated negative
declaration.
Avoidance, Alternatives and Mitiqation Measures
Section 2053 of the Fish and Game Code states:
:
2053. Projects; Threat; Alternatives
The legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
state agencies should not approve projects as proposed which would jeopardize
the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat essential to the
continued existence of those species, if there are reasonable and prudent
alternatives available consistent with conserving the species or its habitats
which would prevent jeopardy.
2054. Project Approvement; Mitigation and Enhancement Measures
The Legislature further finds and declares that, in the event specific economic,
social, or other conditions make infeasible such alternatives, individual projects
may be appmved if appropriate mitigation and enhancement measures are
provided.
The Department maintains that the disclosure and analysis of impacts in the document
is inadequate and incomplete, and project-related impacts are not mitigated to below a
level of significance. If the project impacts are not adequately identified, then a
discussion of avoidance, alternatives and mitigation measures is moot. The Initial
Study contains a discussion of the importance of this area as potential habitat for
endangered or threatened species and even notes that the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service suggested a 3:1 ratio for the loss of coastal sage scrub alone. The
project site contains 18.8 acres of undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
(RAFSS), 20.36 acres of disturbed RAFSS and 23.32 acres of buckwheat scrub.
RAFSS is a rare natural community and is ranked S1.1 (very threatened). RAFSS
habitat has local, regional, and state-wide significance.
The fact that there are a total of 62.48 acres of coastal sage scrub on the site, including
18.8 acres of undisturbed RAFSS, 20.36 acres of disturbed RAFSS, and 20.36 acres of
buckwheat scrub is significant by itself to warrant an EIR. However, the fact that the
proposed development would occur over the entire site and eliminate all native habitat
argues even more for the preparation of an EIR. An EIR should include the discussion
of the local importance of this habitat (RAFSS), a discussion of the cumulative impacts
of development in the area on this habitat, a discussion of avoidance measures to
preserve on-site habitat, a discussion of project alternatives which would protect
RAFSS, and a full discussion of mitigation measures in the event project impacts are
unavoidable.
The EIR should also include a discussion of the direct and indirect impacts of
the proposed development on sensitive biological resources. For instance, there is no
assessment of the direct loss of disturbed RAFSS and buckwheat. There is no
assessment of the indirect effects of development on adjoining sensitive biological
resources. There is no indication that the project includes considerations for buffer
zones, the planting of native drought-tolerant plants, the affects of non-native plants .
nor the affects of domestic animals on the flora and fauna of the project site.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
Section 21002 of CEQA states in part:
The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public
agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible
alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially
lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects, and that the
procedures required by this division are intended to assist public agencies in
systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and
the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or
substantially lessen such significant effects. (Emphasis added.)
Section 21002.1(a) of CEQA describes the purpose of EIRs. It states in part:
The purpose of an environmental impact report is to identify the significant
effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, and
to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or
avoided.
Section 21002.1 (b) describes the role of the lead agency in mitigating for significant
impacts. It states:
(b) Each public agency shall mitigate or avoid the significant effects on
environment of projects that it carries out or approves whenever it is
feasible to do so.
CEQA requires that public agencies systematically identify both significant impacts
and feasible alternatives or mitigation measures to avoid or substantially lessen
significant effects. The Department believes that this EIR does not comply with
Section 21002 of CEQA.
In fact, the only mitigation measure for the loss of sensitive biological resources
proposed in the negative declaration is that the project applicant will purchase off-site
lands to compensate for the loss of 18.8 acres of RAFSS at a 1:1 ratio. The negative
declaration provides no specifics or criteria which would enable the Department to
assess whether the 1:1 mitigation is of equivalent habitat qualify or habitat location.
However, even had the lead agency supplied this information, the Department believes
preparation of an EIR is still warranted.
There are several legal, biological and policy concepts related to the practice of project
impact mitigation. The first concept is that mitigation be in-kind, i.e., loss of riparian is
mitigated by creation of riparian. A second concept is that the mitigation be similar in
quality and quantity, i.e., there is not a net loss of resource area and that habitat
quality and usefulness for impacted wildlife are equivalent. A third concept is that
mitigation can be for temporary or permanent impacts and that mitigation for these
7,
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
respective impacts is not interchangeable. In other words, permanent impacts are not
mitigated by temporary measures. A fourth concept is that specific mitigation measures
be adopted for specific identified impacts. A fifth concept is that lands proposed to
mitigate the loss of permanent natural resources be dedicated for conservation in
perpetuity, with provisions for maintenance and monitoring. None of these concepts,
with the exception of the fifth concept, are utilized in this mitigated negative
declaration.
Rationale for M t .qated Ne,qative Declaration
Section 15064 of the CEQA guidelines discusses determining the significance of
environmental effects caused by a project. It states in part:
(a) The decision as to whether a project may have one or more significant
effects shall be based on Substantial evidence in the record of the lead
agency.
(1) If the lead agency determines there is substantial evidence in the
record that the project may have a significant effect on the
environment. the lead agency shall prepare an EIR (Friends of B
Street v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 988). Said
another way, if a lead agency is presented with a fair argument that
a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead
agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented
with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a
significant effect (No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.
3d 68). (Emphasis added)
It is the opinion of the Department that the proposed development project may have a
significant effect on the environment. The Department bases this opinion on the
current amount of development taking place in the Etiwanda Fan area and the amount
of pristine and disturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub and coastal sage scrub
proposed for removal.
Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub is a plant community designated as 'very
threatened.' For this reason, the Department views adverse impacts to this plant
community in this location as significant.
NCCP Process
In 1997 both the County of San Bernardino and the California Department of Fish and
Game signed a 'Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Natural Community
Conservation Planning." The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a signatory to this MOU..
This memorandum of understanding included several tenets. To summarize, these ar~:
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
(a) The NCCP program is designed to protect habitats for multiple species,
including threatened and endangered species,
(b) The NCCP process complements and supports the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service multi-species conservation planning program,
(c) Up to $1.5 million was appropriated by Congress to support the NCCP
program for the preservation of coastal sage scrub and associated natural
communities,
(d) The County and the NCCP program are committed to effecting regional
protection and perpetuation of natural wildlife diversity, while allowing for
development,
(e) The County and constituent members concur with the goals of the NCCP
Act,
(f) The signatory agencies agree to work together to prepare and submit a
San Bernardino Valley MSHCP by and between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the California Department of Fish and Game, the County of San
Bernardino, the 15 affected cities and other participating agencies.
In 1998 the County of San Bernardino notified the Department that the Memorandum of
Understanding was extended to the year 2000 by the County and seven cities.
Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, a State-designated very threatened habitat, is a
critical component of any MSHCP or NCCP effort in San Bernardino County because it
provides habitat for the federally endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat, the
federally listed Coastal California gnatcatcher, and a number of state-listed plants and
species of special concern.
The Department prefers to operate within the NCCP/MSHCP process because it is
designed to protect a wide variety of sensitive species and habitats. In the absence of
progress on the NCCP/MSHCP process the Department has no choice but to take each
development project on a case by case basis. Particularly important in this process is
the requirement for environmental impact reports and an emphasis on cumulative
impacts, alternatives analyses and avoidance and mitigation measures. These are
areas which the Department feels are currently not adequately addressed in the CEQA
documentation it is reviewing in this area. However, the environmental documentation
which the Department is reviewing indicates that mitigation is being provided solely for
endangered species and habitats. Impacts to habitat not specifically protected by law
and species of special concern are considered non-significant and therefore,' mitigatio.n
is not being required by the lead agency. The Department does not concur with the
conclusion that only endangered species require mitigation.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Rancho
CEQA documents are city and county documents. The Department believes that, in this
instance, an EIR is warranted. The Department has also held conversations with
USFWS concerning the Etiwanda Fan area, the pace of development and the
inadequacy of CEQA documents. The fact that both state and federal agencies
entrusted with protection of biological resources as well as the local San Bernardino
County Museum, which is conducting biological surveys in this area, believe that the
Etiwanda Fan area contains critical habitat argues for the preparation of an EIR. For
this reason, cumulative impact analyses are very important.
The Department also believes that it is not appropriate for the local jurisdictions to
defer their responsibilities under CEQA to future resource agency actions. In this case
there is no determination of whether there are jurisdictional wetlands on the site. The
biological assessment then states that these determinations must be conducted and
necessary permits obtained. A key concept of CEQA is that specific project impacts
and mitigation will be addressed in a document available to the public.
Conclusion
The Department recommends that the City of Rancho Cucamonga require the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the reasons listed in this letter,
Representatives of the Department will be happy to meet with the lead agency and the
consultants to discuss what steps the Department believes need to be taken to bring
the project into compliance with CEQA.. If you have any questions, please call Robin
Maloney-Rames, ES III, Chino Hills, at (714) 817-0585.
Sincerely
Glenn Black
Supervisor
Habitat Conservation - South
Region 6
cc: Jeff Newman, USFWS
HOGLE-IRELAND '
A Land Planning ~' Dct,eloptllc~lt C011Slllf/llg Fir]rl
October 14, 1999
Brent LeCount
City ofRaneho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917:29
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 13759, RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AND GAME LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 1999
Dear Mr. LeCount:
This document has been prepared to respond to the letter from the California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG) dated September 21, 1999 for the subject project. These responses have been
prepared with consultation from the following biologists:
~l LSA Associates: Jack Easton and Denise Woodard
{Ell Kirtland Biological Services: Karen Kirtland
Q Tom Dodson and Associates: Lisa Kegarice
In general, the CDFG letter states that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for the
project to address the cumulative impacts &loss &habitat in the region. In accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the project because the impacts identified as potentially adverse can be mitigated so
that no significant effect on the environment will occur. Section 15064 (f)(2), of CEQA addresses
the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration:
If the lead agency determines there is substantial evidence in the record that the project may
have a significant effect on the environment but the lead agency determines that revisions in
the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the
environmental would occur and there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record
before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the
environment then a mitigated negative declaration shall be prepared.
For ease of review, the following addresses each element of the CDFG letter in the format of a
"Response to Comments" document with response next to each item raised.
4200 Latham Street, Suite B, Riverside, California 92501 · 909 / 787-9222 · F,,x 909 / 781-6014 * www. hogleireland.com
IRVINg RIVERSIDE
................. ~s: 14, 199
4775 Blzd Fenn Rend
Cldno HIlls. California 91709
(909) 393-0635
" September21, 1999 R EO El V E D
SEP g 3 1999
City ol Ranthe Cucamon;
~, pmnnlng Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
planning Division
P.O, Box 807
· Rantfee Cucamonga, CA 91729
Arm: Brent t.eCount
Re: NegaUve Declaration
TentaUve Tract 14759 - Rancho Summit
~ Dear Mr. LeCount:
""- The California Department of Fish end Game (Depadment) thanks you for the
opportunity to comment on the Environmental Assessment.
~ The Depadment has reviewed the Negative Declaration end concluded that the project,
~as proposed, does pose significant adverse rapacts to sensitive blologlcal resources,
that a negative declaration Is not eppropdata and that preparation of an environmental
Impad raped Is warTanted. The Department Is commenting as both a Responsible and
e Trustee Agency. The text of thls letter documents why the Department believes an
environmental impact raped (EIR) Is warranted.
The proposed development consists of the subdivision of 132 acres of land Into 358
stngle family tots and three open space lots. The proled slta contains 18.8 acres of
undisturbed Riversldian Alluvial Fan Sage Scr!~b (RAFSS), 20.38 acres of disturbed
RAFSS, and 23.32 acres of buckwheat saub. The applicant Is proposing to provide
off-site mitigation on a 1:1 ratio for the loss of the 18.8 acres of RAFSS. All native plant
communities are proposed for removal.
;~eoadrnent of Fish and Game Mandate
The Fish and Game Code (Code) provides the authority for the Depadment (o operate
as a state age.ncy. SealIon 1801 of Chapter 8 of the Code discasses the Depadment
polldes and objectives governing the consentsties of wildlife resources. It states:
Response To Cornmania
2 October 14, 1999
Mlllgated Negative Declarelion
CIty of Ranclio Page 3
it Is hereby declared to be the policy of the state to encourage the preservation,
conservation, and maintenance of wildlife resources under the Jurisdiction end
Influence of the state..1his policy Includes the following objectives:
(1) To maintain suffident poputatlons of atl spades of wildlife end the habitat
necessary to achieve the objectives stated In subdivisions (b), (c), and
(d).
" (2) To provide for the beneficial use and enjoyment of wildlife by ell dtlzens
of the state.
(3)To perpetuate all apedes of wildlife for their intrinsic end ecological
values, as well as for their direct benefits to ell persons.
(4) To provide for aesthetic, educational, and non-appmpdatlve uses of the
various wildlife species.
I
y The Department has Judsdlctlon over the conservation, protecfion and
management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for blologlcefiy
sustainable populations of those spades. ]'he Depadment, as trustee for fish
~nd wildlife fe~ources, shall ,..~sutt with lead and respolqsible seendes and
~ I;hall provide. as available. the requisite bloloqtc~l e~,eiiIse to review end
~ current upon envl~on~an|al documents end ;..,a~s -i;$~nG from Dmle,.t
~divitles, as those terms are used Iq the Ca;;ro~ia Env;~o.~6ntal Protedlon'Act
(Division 13, commenting with SealIon 21000 of the Public Resources Code)
[emphasis added]
_Califomla Environmental Quality Act
Section 15002 of the CEQA guidelines defines the basic ptaTx}ses of CEQA as follows:
(1) Infoffn governmental derision makers and the public about the
potential, signfficont environmental effects of proposed e,"qvities,
(2) Identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or
significantly reduced.
(3) Prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by
requiring changes In projects through the use o! alternatives or
mitigation measures when the governmental agency finds the
changes to be feasible.
{4) Disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency
II. espo e To Comments
:l ' ' itober 14, 1999
i~t:aeted Hag Page
cly of nencho
eppmved the ~]ed ~ ~e m~ ~ eg~ ~se e si~ . '.
envme~ eff~l m ~v~ -"
~e ~ of ~ls iegistatl~ Is ~81 ~e Depme~ b · ~stee m~ msFs~te
ege~ ruder California t~ end ~s %..~sdl~m ~er the ~sewetlo~ pmte~im
end ma~gement of fish, ~t~lh, seINe pirate, md ~bttat ne~ss~ fw blobgialty
sustainable ~Tatlons ~ ~se apedes.' It ta cteer ~ ~e Cede ~et ~e
~ep~men~ es e ~stee egenW, elan has ~ t~dmt edvlso~ rote ~ ~e CE~
p;~ss by s~ly~g ~e btctogtmt e;e~ae to review end ~ment u~n
eml~entd do~enb ~d pmJed I~e~s, es 8at~ ~ve. ~s b ~
~ ad~g~ ~e Dep~e~ h a Resm~le Ag~ brae ~e ~le~ may ~olve
~8~s to s~e~eds, ~by ~gg~ ~ n~si~ f~ 8 1~t-1~ 8~ed ' '
~e ~ose ~ ~ls ta~er Is ~ t) em ~e ade~ ~ ~e negative
~er ~e ~86m m~hemen~ of CE~ 2) e~a hff ~e ~ed Idan~fiB8
Io mold or ~stmUelly m~m 8dveme ~ads m ~e em~en~ 3) e~mthe h~
~ avoidend, siterelives md midgallon messes, ~ )
md~e f~ ~s~ · Nge~e
~g[9]]]jlJ]O[~ ' In LSA Associates. July 14, 1999 repel
". (D "
1999 stales: Engineart and Ihe CaJ~ondl Department orrnh and (:]me wee contacted.
A wetland and Jurisdictional delineation for the ptnpoae of determining the limits The project Team. including the EnSlneers and ginInSists, met with the U..~:
of any waters subject to Judsdlcfion by the U.8. Army Corps of Engineers. tinder Army Corps of EnStneess (Corps) onslte to review the site. It was noted
Sectloft 404 of the Clean Water At:l, and Cellftxnla Depedment of Fish end the Idstodca] tbaJneSe to the die was diveted in 1969 by the Flood ConIll
Game (CDFG), under Sealtans 1601-t 603 of the California Fish end Game District levee constructed north of the site. Since that time, the two drains8
Code, would be required to determine whether or not et least the two ixbnmy courses have been vimaJty dr/. !n add]lion to the site visit, a map showinS
site and hi fdatlomhl[I to the adslIng Flood Control improvements and Bencar
dralnageectosainglheaitequallfyuJtxlsdlcllomdwalmt areadrajnaSewefeproviduhotheCorpt Asaresultofthesitevisitlndll'
patesUet Impacts to waters of the Unlled States, wagends or Jurisdictional atre arebeds Inl'ormatinn provided, the Coqa provided a letlet dated September 29, 1999 ~
should be determined durlng the CEQA Pmcess, n°tl°ll°winglL I1a1601-1603 hlr. BiIiStonn(Exin'bltll)stattnalh,llheproposedProJectwiltn°tdlschatr
:" ,..,,..,,...,..,.
negative decimation for a project which requires furlher regulalor/action when the lead
4 October 14, 1999
am,,n. I P.ge s
agency does not know what those Impacts m'e or how they will be mitigated for'? Q "ebecca Jones and Jula Hernandez of Ihe C·flfomla Deparlment of Fish and '
dame liso ~siled the site to determine whether Ihere were streambed or
ff the negaUve declaration Is the end process of CEQA and subsequently the ripallan issues onsite. AJ · result oflhet visil, Ms. Jones requested that we
Department does require a Streambed Altermien Agreement, the Department will have Ideatry the speclflc location of any mulefat (Bacchm~s salicifulia) on the nile
no CEQA cadfiled Infon~atlon upon which to base an agreement on. If the Department because Ihe July 14, 1999 LSA ripen indicated the plant was present and in her
does not have the Information It requires to issue e 1601-1603 Streambed Altarallen site visit, she did not see any. On October 6, wc conducted · focused survey
Agreement through the Clly's CEQA process, the Depadment my have no choice but to ideallY/the speclflc location ofmulefat. A single mulefat was observed on
the extreme southcast border of the site in · disturbed sandy ·re· st the
jo assert lead agency status. interseclion of two dirl roads. Based upon the CDFO site visit and the
In conclusion, the fact that · Streambed Alteration Agreement or other ragulatoP/ informallen provided in LSA letter dated October 8, 1999 regarding the focused
compliance my be required does not relieve the lead agency OF the responsibility survey, the Cldlfomja Dipraiment orFish and Game provided n letter dated
Under CEOA for Informing the public of what specific Impeels the proposed October 13, 1999 stating th~ no Streambed Alteration Agreement is required.
development will have on the environment and Including specific millgallon mangle'as (Ex~bits #2 and #3.)
to reduce those Impacts to n level of Insignificance. Other InfonnaUorml gaps are
discussed throughout the text OF this letter. 2. Habitat linkages provide wildlife a ounneclion from one habitat to another or
from one hebital type to ·nether· The site is bounded on the north by Ihe
realdealt al development and vacant land s, on the soulh by San S evaine/Eliwanda
U,q.M~-The InlUal Study Inctudes the following statement concemlng habitat G Creek flood control debris basin and Further by Highway 30 (currently under
Ihlkgges: conslmclion), on the sast by residential development and on the west by the San
~ The site may fundIon to some degree as e habitat linkage but construction of the SevsineJEtiwsnda Creek flood control channel·
t Route 30 Freeway ta the south would prevent future linkage value OF the site.
Fudhen~ore, the site Is sun'Goaded In the south end west by open spaceSlend ~ provides s map showing Ihe surrounding property characteristics.
"~" control Improvements which could continue ta provide 8 habitat linkage In the Wildlife may move From the habitat to Ihe north onto the site end vice verse.
area. The Impact Is not considered significant, This movement is not only constricted by neighboring development, but is
::~ Further limited by traflic on Summit Avenue that runs through the northeastern
ofTh;e..o; po.lu. of,...i,..
discussion of the value OF IxJrtlons of the silo for regional habllaL Wildfire movemeal from Ihe east is severely limited because or residential
·deve:, Vment both existin8 and under construction and Rom the soulh because
of lhe debris basin and !lighwsy construction. Farther soulh beyond Highway
30 constrnclion is also existing residenlial development. The flood control
chennel that borders the western portion oflhc site also sen, ca as a barrier In
wildlife movement onto the nile from open space areas to Ihe west· The flood
control channel itself does not provide any value Io wildllfc becluse it consists
of· rocky channel, denuded orany veget·tlon.
Flood control facilities, roadways, and development surrounding the nile on
Ihren (3) sldcs makes onsite habitat the terminus of · "finger" of potential
hobliar that extends down From the undeveloped land to the north. Thus the site
does not link othenvlse disjunct hebilet patches and therefore does not meet the
basic dcflnhion of· hebilat linkage or cor~dor. A linkage or corrldorjolns Iwo
or more olherwise disjuncl palchea of habitat. All wildlife occupy a particular
hebhst Ihat "moves" as part ofrnuline day-In-day Foraging and other ·clivlties.
Such movement, in and of'itself, does not mean that · parlicular site is a habitat
linkage or wildlife movement corridor. Thus, impacts that may result, Is they
rcfcr the sile's potenlial for use as a wildlife hobliar linkage arc not considered
slgnillcanl.
14, 1999
Page 6
[Neither was there a
threetenedplentcommunltyortheusefullnessofdlsturbedRAFSShebltetf°rwildlife' _~. July14, t999reportshowsthef°tl°wingplantc°mmunityimpacts°nTablcA
whet Is undlstmbed and whel is dlstttoed RAFSS. Tsbls A -Plsnt Community (Aere$)
plapl Community ImPacts
~' Rivcrsidcan Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
20.36
Dislurhcd Ri~.crsldcan Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
23
Buckwheat Semb 62 4~.
D~sturbed Annual Grassland with SeaHated Scrub 48 I
14.3
Eucal~,lnus Windrows 2.65
Olivc Trees 0.08
Oak Tree 4.34
Disturbcd
~isn#reed Se~btotnl
Granj Total
The 132-acre site, p~or to human development, may have been completely
vegetated by the Riversidean atluvlal fan sage scrub community. The above
table clearly shows that site has several other plant communilies present as a
result of both on-site and adjacent off-tile dislurbances, totaling 69.52 acres of
disturbed non-scrub babilat and 43.68 acres ordisturbcd scrub habitat on site.
On.siledisturbancesincludeapparentbistoricaflrlcutluraluse' Adjacentoff-site
disturbances include flood control, residential, and roadway development. The
largest limiling off-sile factor to alluvial ran sage scrub community on site is
Ilood control. Flows to the msin.drsinage located on the western portion orthc
silo were cul off as s result of levees bullt upstream in 1969 ( pars. corns. Julia
Gilbert or San Bernardino County Flood Control, September 29, 1999).
Alluvial ran sage scrub is a successtonal plant community dependent upon st
least SO* Io 100-year slorm events for survival.
The dlsturbcd Pjversldean alluvial ran sage scrub and buckwheat scrub present
on site is relativdy poor in quality compared to the undisturbed alluvial fan sag·
scrub present. The dlsturbed alluvial fan sage scrub has a lower species
diversity as well as lower percent shrub covet than the undisturbed areas. The
disturbed Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub also has a dominant understory of
non-native grassland species. The report also clearly states the difference
between (or criterla for) the undisturbed vs. disturbed alluvial fan sage scrub,
as follows;
"This habit at contains many ofthe species present in undisturbed
Riversldean alluvial fan sage scrub, but the scrub is sparset,
there arc many more non-native plant speclcs present, and Ibe
area has been subjected to much of the trash-dmnping and other
dislurbances so common in Ihe disturbed annual grassland."
I~,esponse To Comateal
October 14, 199
Page
The buckwheat scrub is fairly monolypic in species composilion (i.e., it is almost
exclusively California buckwheat) and has almosl no topographic relief Stands
Ihat have only buckwheat scrub are usually the result of prior dislurbance.
Therefore, this community is probably Ihe resuh of the Riversidean sage scrub
being cleared, or impacted in some other way, such that only buckwheat, a
species that readily colonizes disturbed sites, is nearly the sole species present.
This habitat is of poor quality compared to the undisturbed Riversidean alluvial
fan sage scrub present on site and similar habilat in the region.
No federal or State threatened or endangered species were identified on site.
LSA conducted Focused surveys for the Quino checkerspot butterfly, California
gnatcatcher. and San Bernardino knngaroo rat and found none oflhese species
Io be present on silt during the 1999 sludies.
Although, the July 1999 biological report does slate Ihnt dislurbed Riversidean
alluvial fan sage scrub habitat could be utilized by gnatcalchers, it is usually
utilized in the absence of higher quality habitat. In addition, LSA has conducted
:~ California gnatcalcher surveys on approximately 500 acres located immediately
-- noahweal ofthe site in 1999. The results documented in a rapoff titled ~att
~ Sel~i##e/Etiu~mta Creek Chaintel Multi Species S, rveys. (LSA, August 2,
1999) found Ihe California gnatcatcher to be absent from the 500-acre sludy
area. Therefore, because of on-site and off-site habitat disturbances and the
lack of California gnatcatcher sighrings in the immediate project vicinity, it is
concluded the hobliar on site is of low value to rbe California gnatcatcher.
The loss of 18.8 acres ofundislurbed Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub is
.considered significant because of its slatus as a "very rare" planl communily, bul
Is nol considered a significant loss of habitat Io wildlife in adjacent similar
habitat because of rbe existin8 surrounding development lhat isolates it from
adjacenl habilaL The impacts Io orber scrub wildlife habitat on site is adverse,
but is nol considered I significant impact.
f:i'he Negauve Declaration also did --
not Include a discussion of the relative merits of maintaining habitat on-site versus off- Q 4. The impact ofthe loss of 18.8 acres ofundislurbed Riversidean alluvial fan sage
site mitigation. The Department believes thai these are 811 Issues which should be . scrub will be mitigated by Ihe purchase of 20 acres to be added to an open space
addressed In the context of an Environmental Impact Raped, nola mitigated negaGve J - preserve. Because orlhe dislurbed nature ore majority of the habitat on site
decimation. and Ihe lack orhabilat adjacenl to Ihe silt, on silt mitigation is considered to be
oflinle or no value.
s ~ Response t o ~,olyinlellt5
bar 14, 1999
Page 8
~oldence, Alternatives end Millteflon Measures
Sectton 2053 of the FIsh and Gems Code states:
|
2053. projects; Threat; Alternatives
The legislature further finds end declares that it is the policy of the state that Q
1
~Mltlllnled Hagalive Declaration
~ 5. The LSA report dated July 14, 1999 identifies that biological surveys were
CltyofRancho ~ completed on the site and no federal or State listed species were present;
state agencies should not approve projects es proposed which would leoPnrdlze (
the continued existence of any endangered spedes or threatened species or therefore no consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife will be required.
result In the destruction or adverse modification of habitat essential to the J Although IUversidean alluvial fan sage scab is potential habitat for threatened
continued existence of ihose species If there are reasonable end prudent 6.
alternatives available consistent with conserving the species or Its habitats or endangered species, none were identified on the site. The majority of the
' habitat on site has been disturbed and is disjunct from any adjacent suilable
which would prevent jeopardy. habilat for reasons previously stated. The U.S. Fish and WildIlls Service
-- '~ (USFWS) suggests a mitigation ratio of 3:1 for the loss orocc,pied coastal
proJectApprovement; Mitigation and EnhancementMeasures G sage scrub habitats (i.e., coastal sage scrub occupied by the California
2054, gnatcatcher). The USFWS has no regulatory authority over uuoccupiedcoastsl
I'~ The Legislature further finds and declares that, n the event specific economic, sc8e scrub habitat in San Bernardinn County. The 3: I ratio is usually requested
~ may be 8pprovod If appropriate mitigation arid enhmlcament measures me for 9Ccunicd coastal sage scrub habitat; however, mitigation ratios are
_._. social, or other conditions make Infeaslbl8 such alternatives, thd vldual prayers negotiable depending on habitat quality and other site specific factors.
. provided.
~ The Department maintains that the disclosure end analysis of Impacts in the document As stated previously, the 18.8 acres of undisturbed Rive~idean alluvial ran sage
~ present site is helng mitigated through the purchase of 20 acres of
",-J is inadequate end Incomplete, and proJect4etated Impede are not mitigated to below a on
level of significance. If the projar Impacts are not adequately Identified, then a comparable off-sltc habitat. Impacts to Ihe other scab habitats on site are cot
discuss on of avoidance alternatives and mitigation measures Is moot. The Initial considered significant and thus no mitigation is required.
Study contains a discuss on of the Impurerico of this ares as potential habitat for Riversirish etluvlal fan sage scrub was identified as an important habitat type
endangered or threatened species and even notes that the United States FIsh and 7. and evaluated accordingly in the biological resources report. [n addition, in
Wi allire Service suggested · 3:1 ratio for the ass of coastal sage scrub alone. The response to Comment Number 3, we have clarified the status of Riversidles
projed site cants ns 18.8 acres of undisturbed Riversidles AJ uvial Fen Sage Scrub
(RAFSS), 20.36 acres of disturbed RAFSS and 23.32 acres of buckwheat scab. alluvial fan sage scrub as a "very rare" plant community.
RAFSS Is e rare natural community and Is ranked S1.1 (very threatened). RAFSS
hab,,at .a. ,o.,. rsg,a..,..nd 'c'u"=i.,i%:?y
the total can be significant. However, no acceptable standard has been provided
The fad that there are 8 tota of 62.48 acres of coastal sage scrub on the site, including Ihat would evaluate any one contribution as significant, olher than for hnbilals,
16.8 acres of undisturbed RAFSS, 20.36 acres of disturbed RAFSS, and 20.36 8 such as wetland areas, that are protected by current reBulafion. Therefore, each
buckwheat scrub Is significant by Itse f to wettest en EIR. However, the fad that the Q development is acknowledged as contributing incrementally to the loss of
proposed development would occur over the entire site and eliminate all nafive bah!tat habitat. The resolution of such reglonwlde loss can only be mitigated through
argues even more for the preparation of an EIR. An EIR should Include the discussion regional planning efforts to conscn'e important areas of such habitat. Although
of the local Impudence of this habitat (RAFSS), e discussion of the cumulative impacts a regional planning effort is still in its formatlye stages in the region, it is
o! development 16 the area on this habitat, a discussion of avoidaPse measures to expected to uhlmntely consist of key preserve areas that are acquired or
r:::s .p..d.d., .. off.., re, ,mp.c,. of d..,upm.., '" o,her .,.... Th. p,opn.d
ml,ig.,iu.,p.,ch..of O.c,.ofh.h',a, offs""oh'added'° .dd.'o.'
hahital preserve) represents appropriale mitigation.
unavoidable.
October 14, 199~
assessment OF the dired loss of disturbed RAFSS and buckwheat. There is no
assessment OF the indited eftads of development on adjoining sensitive biological
resources. There is no Indication that the proJed Includes considerations for buffer 18.80 acres or Rivergirlish alluvial fan sage scrub, 20.36 acres or disturbed
zones, the planting of native drought-tolerant plants, the 8finds OF non..nallve planIs . Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub and 2332 acres orbuckwhcat scrub. Olhcr
nor the effects OF domestic animals on the flora and fauna of the project gila. habitat losses include 48. I $ acres or disturbed annual grassland wilh scattered
6 scrub, 0.08 acres of oak tree and a vadety of non native habitats Iolafing an
Malgaled Nega0ve DedamUon additional 21.29 acres. Other direct impacts include the loss oFpolential habitat
City of Rsncho for a variety of sensitive species, including repeats and plant species.
Section 21002 of CECLA states In part: [ Due to the disturbed nature ormost of the site, only Ihe loss ofthe 18.8 acres
of Riversidlan alluvial fan sage scrub was considered to be significant.
The Legislature finds arid declares that It is the policy of the stale Ihat public Q I,,titigalion for Ihis impact is the off-site purchase of 20.0 acres of scrub habilat
agencies should net approve proJade as proposed If there are feasible off-site, In be added to another habitat preserve area adjacent.
alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially
lessen the significant environmental effects of such proJade, and thai the The affects of'domestic animals on the flora and Fauna ofthe project were not
procedures required by this division are Intended to assist public agerides In evaluated, since the project involves the loss or removal of all native species as
systematically Identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and pan arthe construction phase.
the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or
substantially lessen such significant effects. (Emphasis added.) Indirect impacts include loss or habitat for use by wildlife off-site (including
foraging rapiers).
:~j..~$ectlon 21002.1(a) of CEQA describes the purpose of EIRs, It states In part:
Due to surrounding land uses, the connection with off-site habitat is constrained
and limited primarily to a connection with habitat to the norlh. Therefore, the
The purpose of en environmental Impact report Is to Identify the significant
eftads on the environment of a proJed, to Identify alternatives to the project, mid loss or potenlial habilat for sensilive species in oR-site habitat was not
tO indicate the manner In which those significant effects can be mitigated or considered to be significant.
avoided. The remaining measures requested by Ihe CDFG include the use of'bulrcr areas
and the use oFnative drought tolerant plants. The measures were not evaluated
Section 21002.1 (b) describes the role of the lead agency In mitigating for significant due to the absence orsignlficant impacts that would involve their use.
Impacts. It slates:
9. The CDFG quotes sections on approval policies related to the evaluation of
{b) Each public agency shall mitigate or avoid the significant eftads on significant elTecls, delermlnation of'mitigation measures and project allernativea
environment of projects that It cardes out or approves whenever It is to reduce significant erects. The CDFG indicates Ihat, in thelr opinion, Ihe
feasible to do so. Ncgallve Declarallon does not address there issues. The CDFG also states that,
in their opinion, even had such information been provided, as ElK is "still
CEQA requires that public agencies systematically identify both slgnificanl Impacts warranted".
and feasible allernatives or mitigation measures to avoid or substantially lessen
significant effects. The Department believes that this EIR does not comply with The City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted an evaluation or impacts In
Section 21 1302 of CEQ/L biological resources based on the biological report and on discussions wilh
tcpresenlatives from resource agencies. The determination Io prepare a
In fad, the only mitigation measure for the loss of senarrive biological resources Negative Declaration was evidently based on the findings of the report and these
proposed In the. negative declaration Is that the projec~ applicant will purchase off-site discussions, as well as the subsequent mitigation measure (prompted by
lands to compensate for the loss of 18.8 acres of RAFSS at a I:1 ratio. The negative comments From the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) to acquire suitable scrub
declaration provides no spedtics or cdteda which would enable the Depadment to habitat air site Io offset Ihe loss of scrub habitat on site. Additional
assess whether the 1: 1 mitigation Is of equivalent habitat quality or habitat location. document alien to evalust e environmental impede was not deemed neccssaW by
However, even had the lead agency supplied this Information, the Department believes Ihe City.
preparWof an EIR is still warranted.
'
There are several ega b o og cal and po icy concepts related to the pradlce of proled
Impad m t gallon The first c~ncept s that mitigation be in-kind, I.e., less or dpadan is
mitigated by creation of dpadan. A second concept Is that the mitigation be .similar in -
qua ity and quantity i.e. there is not a net loss of resource area and that habitat
qua ty and usefulnesSfor mpacted wildlife are equivalent. A third concept is that
mitigation can be f~j ~porary or permanent impacts end that m figation for these
7 "" I0. The proposed mitigation for significant impacts on site ( 18.8 acres orhahilat
Mitigated Negative OedmlUon oilsire) are beinG utillzcd for all five mitigation policy concepts presented.
CIty of Rancho
respedlvelmpactslsnotlnterchangeable. In other words, permanent lmpacts are not ~ I~ Theseindude(I)in-kindreplacem~ntofimpaetedPjversideanalluvialransaGe
scrub; (2) purchase of 20 acres orhabitat with comparable quahilly end quality;
mitigated by temporary measures. A fourth concept Is that specific mitigation measures (3) the permancnl loss of 18.8 acres is beinG mltiGatcd with the purchase or20
· be adopted for spedtic Identified Impacts, A fifth concept Is that lends proposed to acres to bc preserved in perpetuity with the appropriate bondinG For Tend
mitigate the loss of permanent natural resources be dedicated for conservation In management; (4) the specific identified impact oF 18.8 acres oF Riversldean
perpetuity, with pravlslons for malrjtananco end monitoring. None of these concepts, alluvial fan sage scrub is beinG mitiSalad with the purchase of 20 acres bahliar
with the excepUon of the fifth concept, are utilized in this mitigated negative oR'site; and (5) as pan ofan open space preserve the land will be preserved in
declaration, perpetuity with provisions For maintenance and monitorinG.
Rationale for Mitlaated Nanalive Declaration "~ I I. Section 15064 ofthe CEQA 8uldeiines continues with the Following discussion:
Section 15064 of the CEQA guidelines discusses determining the significance of (2) irthe lead agency determines there is substantial evidence in Ihe
record Ihal the project may have a significant elTcct on the
::~envlronmental eftads caused by 8 proled, It states In part: anvlronmenl but the lead agency determines that revisions in the
project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the
~ (e) The decision as to whether e project may have ene or more signfficant applicant would avoid Ihe ciTeeta or mitigate the eR'ecls Io a
effects shall ha based on substanUal evidence In the record of the lead point where clearly no significant cited on the environmenial
agency. would occur and there is no substantial evidence in light oFthe
(1) If the lead agency determines them Is substantial evidence In the ~ whole record bcrore the public agency that the project, as
(~ record that the project may have a significant effect on the revised, may have a significant elTect on the environment then
environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR (Friends of B rollteared negative declarelion shall he prepared.
~ Sb'eet v. CIty of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 988). Said
another way, If · lead agency is presented with a fair argument that Because impacts considered significant ( 18.8 acres or Riversidean alluvial Fan
a project may have a significant effect on the envlranment, the lead sage scrub)are beinG adequately mitigated and no other significant impacts were
agency shall prepare an EIR even though If may also be presented identified, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment·
with other substantial evidence that the proled will not have a
significant erred (No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 CaL
3d 68). (Emphasis added)
It is the opinion of the Department that the proposed development praJed may have 8
significant erred on the envkonmenL The Department bases this opinion on the
current amount of development taking place In the Ettwanda Fan area end the amount
of pdstine and disturbed Rlversldlan Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub end coastal sage scnjb
proposed for removal.
Riversldlan Alluv'lal Fen Sage ScnJb Is a plant community designated 8s 'very
threatened.' For this reason, the Department views adverse Impads to this plant
community in this location as slgnificant-
Kespotlse I O LUll|lliCiil.%
October 14, 1999
Page I 1
In 1991 both Iho County o[ San B~mardino ~nd the Cali[omla Depa~menl o[ Fish ~nd
Game rigned a '~emorandum of ~nde~landlna Regarding ~alural Communil~
~ls memorandum of undemta~ing In~uded several tenets. To sumarlze, ~ese ~e:
~. 12. The Memorandum of Undcrstandln8 (MOU), siSned by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. to cooperate in the development of a Muhi-Spccies Habitat
8 Consolation Plan (MSHCP) for Ihe San Bernardthe Valley does establish
M~IOaI~ Nqa~e Oe~mU~ interim review 8uldclines for projects procccdin8 while Ihc MSHCP is under
~olRm~o dcvclopmcnl. The interim project roylow 8uidclincs state that Ihc
(a) ~e NCCP program Is desl~ to ~ted habitats f~ mltlple spades, recommendations of the CDFG are advisoW; the final dccision of whether to
Including healened a~ end~ger~ spies, approve. media, or deny a project remains in the hands oflhe lead aBen~ (in
this case, the City or Rancho CucamonGa) pursuant to existinS laws. The
(b) ~e NCCP pm~ss ~mplements and suppods ~e U.S. Fi~ ~ ~ldllfe interim review 8uidclincs state that each lead aBen~ shall determine whcl~r a
Se~I~ mltl-spedes~se~aUon pl~lng ~mm, · project shall be reviewed pursuanl to the 8uidclincs. Further, the lead aSency
rclalns Ihe discretion Io dcle~ine that a project wilhin the plan area, because
(c) Up to $1.5 million ~s appmp~at~ by C~gress to sup~d ~e NCCP of the project's characte~stlcs. has no impact on the viabilily or bioloBical
program for ~e presewaUon ~ mastal .ge s~b end assisted nalml resources and would not preclude lenS-term prese~ation plannin8.
~ ~m~lUes, Because impacts considered siBni6cant (18.8 acres or Rivcrsidean alluvial fan
~ saBe scrub) are 5cin8 adequately miliSatcd and no el her siBni ticant impale were
~ (d) ~e CounW and the NCCP pm~ are ~ltted to effedlng regional idenli~cd. it is concluded that the recommendation of an Elf by Ihe CDFG is
prote~ton a~ pe~etuafion d ~ml ~ldUfe dive~l~, ~lle all~ f~ not warranted for impacts to coaslal saBe scrub on the site.
~ development,
(e) ~e Com~ ~ mnsU~e~ me~e~ ~ ~ ~e g~ls of ~e NCCP
A~
~e stgnaloW agencies agree Io ~ together to ~pam and submit a
San Bemaffilno Valley MSHCP by and be~een ~e U.S. Fish and ~ldlife
Se~l~, ~e California Oepament of Fish end Game, ~e County ~ S~
Be~l~, ~e 15 affm~ dues ~ offi~ ~ldpattng agates.
In 1998 ~e C~nW of San Bema~lno notified ~e Depament ~at ~e Memom~ ~
Undersmdlng ~s e~e~ed to ~e yes 2~ by ~e County ~ seven allies.
Resp e To Commenl!
itober 14, 199<
Page I;
Rlversldlan Nluvlal Fan Sage Scrub, a State-designated very threatened habitat, is a (J ~
critical component of any MSHCP or NCCP effort In San Bernardlno County because it
provides habitat for the fedemily endangered San Bemardino kangaroo rat, the
federelly listed Coastal California gnatcatcher, and a number of state-listed plants end
spades of special concorn.
The Department prefers to opereta wtthln the NCCP/MSHCP process because it Is
destgned to protect a wide verlety of sensitive spedes and habHats. In the absenco of 13. TheCDFGrecommcndsmhigationforhabhatnotspccificallyprotcctedbYlaw
· progress on the NCCP/MSHCP process the Depadment has no choice but to take each (i.e., habitat not occupied by on threatened/endangered species). The project
development project on a case by case basis. padlculady Imporient In this process is proposes to provide just such mitigation. Nowhere does the document suggest
the requirement for environmental Irapad rapotis end an emphasis on cumulative thai mitigation is required only For endangered species. In Fact, mitigation is
Impads, alternatives analyses end avoidance and mitigation measures. These ere being proposed for habitat not occupied by threatened/endangered species·
areas which the Depadment feels are currenUy not adequately addressed in the CEQA ThereFore, it would appear that the project is in compliance with Ibe CDFG
documentation it Is reviewing in this area. However, the envlrenmental documentation recommendations·
which the Department Is reviewing Indicates that mitigation Is being provided solely for
endangered species and habitats. Impacts to habitat not specifically protected by law
and species of special concern are considered non-significant and therefore: mitigation
Is not being required by the lead agency. The Department does not cencu3' with the
::~ conclusion that only endangered spades require mitigation.
~ MItigated NegaUve Declaration
~ CIty of Rancho
' CEQA documents are city end county documents. The Depadment believes that, in this
Instance, an EIR is warranted. The Department has also held conversations with
USFWS concerning the Ethamnda Fen area, the pace of development and the
Inadequacy of CEQA documents. The fad that both state end federal agencies
antrested with protedion of biological resources as well as the local San Bernardino
County Museum, which Is conducting blo|oglcal sun/eye In this eree, believe that the
Etiwanda Fan area contains critical habitat argues for the preparelion of an EIR. For
this reason, cumulative Impact analyses am very Important.
Response To Comlnenl
October 14, 199'
Page I
The Department also believes that ti Is not appropriate for the local Jurisdictions to "'~ )
defer their responsibilities under CEQA to future resource agency actions. In this case
flare Is no determination of whether there are Judsdldlonal wetlands on the site. The
biological assessment then sites that these determlrmllons must be conducted and 14. A conclusion has been reached, with concurrence from the CDFG and the
necessary permits obtained. A key caneapt of CE(3A Is that specific proled Impacts Corps. thai jurisdictional wellands are not present on the site. Thus. subsequent
end millgallon will be ad~'essed In e document available to the public. permilling for such issues in not required
The Department recommends that the CIty of Rencho Cucamonga require the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the reasons listed In this letter.
Representatives of the Department will be happy to meet with the lead agency and the
consultants to discuss what steps the Department believes need to be taken to bdng
the project Into compliance with CEQA.. If you have any questions, please call Robin
Maloney-Rames, ES Iti, Chtho HIlls, at (714) 817-0585.
Sincerely
Glenn Black
Supervisor
Habitat Conservation - South
Region 6
co: Jeff Newman, USFWS
09129199 07:45 F.G. 909 7hi 7bLL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS AI~n=: ¢:r., DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
SEVEN OAKS DAM RESIDENT 0FRCE
32330SAHTAANACANYONRD
Rm.YTO
^~o~- Septexrd:er 29, 1999
Office of the Chief
geSulatory Branch
Bill Storm, Lermar Homes
c/o: Tom Dodson & Associates
2150 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, C~lifomia 92i05-4D02
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to your application (No. 199916546-Alb'") dated August 26, 1999 for a
Departntent of the Army permit to construct the "Rancho Sununit" project (TIT 14159) near East
Etiwanda Creek in Rancho Cucnn',onga, San Bernardino County, California.
from our office.
The receipt of your application is appredated. II you have any questions, please contact
Antal Sziii ot my staff at (909) 79~-770~.
Sincerely,
f~/Iv~k Durham
C~ef, South Coast Sec~on
l~datory Branch
10/~3/1999 15:58
~ TE OF CALIFORNtA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY OAV~9. Governor
D~PARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ,- -
Eemem Slefrl-lrdlnd Dfae'ts ~
Re6don 6
330C,~idenSh~'e.S~teSO
La~g 8e.a~t~ C~Oorras 808~2
,Octo, ber 13, 1999
Ms. Pare Stcclc
Hoglc-lreland Ine..
4200 Latham Stre.~ Suit
Riv~rsid=, CA 92501
Re: Tentative Traot 14759
Dear Ms. St~cla:
This lets' is rcgarding0m ur.d for a StrcanRnxt Alteration A.~'c,~naff for Taztativ¢ Tra~ 14759-
Rancho Su..,.~L On Sgpt~mbe~ 21, 1999, a site visit was made by Juan Hemandez and me. There
were no signs ofsalimem trimsport or fipaxian vegetation within the chinreel axeas. Etiwand Creek
has been diverted offerthe property by San Bemaxdino County Flood Control lhoilities. Two
enlverts oressing under Summit Ave. just south east of where it interse0ta with Wilson Ave. were
sccn~ but engc past the outlet no defined banks or ohanncls were observed.
The Department ha~ detg,,fincd that no Streambed Alteration Agreement will be need for this
pro joel.
The Department reserves the right to suspend or cancel this letter for other ree.,tons. Inoluding but
not limited to, the following:
a. The Department determines that the information provided by the Operator in support of the
inacc:u~ata;
b The Depaxtm~nt obtmns new information that was not known to it in prepanng the
tm and conditions of the agz'eemcnt;
o. The project or project activities ae desoribed in the Notification/Agreement have
changed; anti
d. The oondltions of or affecting fish end wtldlife resources change or the I)epaxtmem
determines that project activities will result in an adverse effect on the cnvinmmem
EXHIBIT #2
October 8, 1999
prHscspah Ms. PamSteele
Rol, ~d,., Hogie-Lreland
s~,c,I. s,.,ay 4200 Latham Street. Suite #B
t.c.c..a Riverside, CA 92501
Dat. ld CI, re
~,~.., ,,..a,,.t,. Subject: Raneho Summit CFentative Tract Map 14759) Focused Mulefat Sur-
Rith,~rd I I.ola~ht'r vey
I.~,'.y ,~.', '""~' Dear Ms. Steele:
r;..t,lly,t I..I,cll LSA Associates. Inc. (LSA) conducted a focused survey for mulefat (Baccharis
n,tt .it.,,.... $alicifolia) on the above referenced site. The survey was conducted in response to a
~,,~, u,-c.,.,, site visit conducted by Ms. Becky Jones of the California Department of Fish and
,,a,..,.. P,...,,. Game (CDFG) to address the potential for drainage channels present on the site to be
~,,~, ~,~,..,,~,,.I. regulated under Section 1603 of the California Fish and Game Code (Code). Based on
u,...t tt z.,t. her field evaluation and review of the LSA's Biological Resourcea Report for TTM
· 14759 (Rancho Summit), Rancho Cucamonga. dated July 14, 1999, she requested
.4 .......' "' further information on the mulefat identified in the LSA biological report. Mulefat is
/.,,..'. I~., ..... a hydrophytic (water-loving) plant species that is usually associated with a water
c,,,,,,,,. ~.~t,,., source. such as a drainage channel. but is often found in association with upland plant
/.-;.' r..t .... The CDFG is empowered to issue agreements for any alteration of a river, stream, or
s,,s,.,..i r.,~. ..... lake where fish or wildlife resources may be adversely affected. Streams (and riven)
K,.:.-, t~,,,~,,. are defined by the presence of a channel bed and banks, and at least an intermittent
r...,t. It....;, .... flow of water. The CDFG generally includes. within the jurisdictional limits of
ct,,,, K.;i,,..,. sWcams and lakes, any ~parian habitat present. Riparian habitat includes willows.
I,.t.~ n ~.,t.,,., mulefat, and other vegetation typically associated with the banks of a stream or lake
~.,,.,,,.., .x,,;,.it. shoreline. No tipman habitat was identified in the July 1999 biological resousccs
I,.y ~h.= ..,-r,,., LSA biologist, Denise Woodard. surveyed the subject site on October 6, 1999 to look
t...,,.-.. ,,..,,,'...,.,for mulefat within two drainages present on site and adjacent areas. One drainage is
i,tt xx ,1..,, ~ rt.~,,,,,.,present on the eastern portion of the site and the other in the middle of the site, both
run generally north to south. These drainages were defined based on the presence of
channel bed and banks.
No mulefat was observed within the two drainages. However, a single mulefat was
observed (see attached Figure 2) on the extreme southeast border of the site. This
plant was in a disturbed sandy area at the intersection of two dirt roads. This plant
was not associated with any drainage channel exhibiting bed and banks.
Please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 781-9310 if you have any questions or re-
quire fi~rther information.
Sincerely,
Denise D. Woodard
Project Manager/Biologist
10/8/99(R:~ALE83 I',mulcfatsurvey.wlxt) 2
.,
LEGEND:
IOr/,99tALEa31} Figure 2
N Rancho Summit (Tract 14759)
s~t. i.F..., Plant Communities and
LEGEND SITE UTIUZATION MAP -
_ , TRACT BOUNDARY TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14759
==,,,,,,, ETIWANDA CREEK RANCID SUMMIT LLC
=REPARED B'r:-=ALLARD ENGINEERING /~r~) ~-i(~ F EXHIBIT #4 _
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 22, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad BuUer, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 - RANCHO
SUMMIT - The proposed subdivision of 132 acres of land into 358 single family iota.
hnd 3 lettered lots for common open space/parks totaling 18.3 acres in the Low
Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan,
located on the east and west sides of Wardman Bullock Road, north and south of
Summit Avenue - APN: 226-102-17.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Proiect Density: The project is proposed to be developed under both the Basic and Optional
Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan with an overall density of 2.9 dwelling
units per acre. The Basic Development portion is 2.1 dwelling units per acre and the Optional
Development portion is 3.4 dwelling units per acre. For the Low Residential District, basic
standards allow up to 3 dwelling units per acre and Optional allow up to 4 dwelling units per
acre.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Single family homes and vacant land; Very Low Residential District (up to 2
dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan
South - Flood control basin; Open Space District, Etiwanda Specific Plan
East Single family homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
Etiwanda Specific Plan
West - Vacant land and flood control facilities; Open Space District, Etiwanda Specific
Plan
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Low Residential
North - Very Low Residential
South - Open Space/Flood Control
East Low Residential
West Open Space/Flood Control
D. Sit__e Characteristic__s: The site slopes from north to south at approximately 3.5 percent. The
site contains a grove of Olive trees required to be preserved per the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
Two remnant drainage courses traverse the property but very little water flows through them
because of past flood control efforts to the northwest of the site. Access will be via an
extension of Wardman Bullock Road connecting the current termini at Wilson Avenue and
at the southwest area of Tract 13566 and by an extension of Summit Road into the site
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 14759 o RANCHO SUMMIT
September 22, 1999
Page 2
connecting with Wardman Bullock Road. A master planned access to the Etiwanda
Northeast Park to the west of the site is proposed. The site is surrounded to the north by
single family homes across Wilson Avenue, to the east by single family homes, to the west
by a flood control channel, and to the south by a flood control basin.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposal is for subdivision only; home plans will be reviewed with a future
Development Review application. The site is proposed to be developed under both the Basic
and Optional Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The northeastern
portion of the site (93 lots north and east of Wardman Bullock Road) would be developed
under Basic Standards with the remaining area south and west of Wardman Bullock Road
under Optional Standards (265 lots).
B. Open Space: The Etiwanda Specific Plan Optional Development Standards require that
30 percent of the site be set aside for common open space in the Low Residential District.
Three public parks are proposed within the project varying in size from 3.7 acres to
approximately 8 acres. The parks are proposed to be linked via a trail system following
Wardman Bullock Road and Summit Avenue. The applicant is working with Parks
Development staff on park designs.
C. Park Improvements/Fees: Developers of residential projects are charged Park Impact Fees
upon issuance of building permits to offset the demand for parks created by new homes. In
!he subject case, the developer is dedicating land and constructing public park improvements
~n lieu of paying park fees.
D. Drainaqe: A portion of the proposed development is located within a Zone D~ special flood
hazard area as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Tracts to the
northeast and east of the site have been required to construct special flood protection walls.
The applicant has processed an application with the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to remove the property from the undetermined flood zone area. The conditions of
approval require that construction of the Etiwanda Channel and debris basin be initiated prior
to the issuance of building permits. In addition, the developer will be required to provide
protection from local flows that are not contained by the basin and channel.
E. Wilson Avenue Parkway: The Etiwanda Specific Plan indicates the ultimate right-of-way for
Wilson Avenue shall be 155 feet. The south side of the street bears the majority of the
burden with a required right-of-way of 104 feet from the centerline of the street. The excess
right-of-way on the south side of the street is necessary to accommodate the Metropolitan
Water District north feeder line. When the Etiwanda Specific Plan was prepared, the exact
alignment of the Metropolitan Water District line within the Wilson Avenue street section was
unknown. Correspondence from Metropolitan Water District indicates the water line is on the
north side of the street at Wardman Bullock Road, fronting the project, and that the line
crosses to the south side of Wilson Avenue 850 feet west of Wardman Bullock Road.
Therefore, the 155 foot right-of-way dimension can be reduced along the frontage of tl'ie
project site.
Flood Zone D is an area in which flood hazards are undetermined.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
September 22, 1999
Page 3
As a result of Proposition 218, the City desires to limit publicly maintained landscaped areas
to avoid the necessity of raising landscape maintenance district fees. in order to meet this
goal and still provide a generous parkway, staff is proposing that the applicant process an
Etiwanda Specific Plan amendment to reduce the parkway width from 65 feet to 40 feet
between Wardman Bullock Road and 850 feet westerly, for an overall right-of-way width of
130 feet. Staff believes the 40-foot parkway width will successfully reduce the maintained
area yet continue to provide room for trail and bike path amenities. The visual impacts of the
transition between the two widths can be mitigated through landscaping.
F. Street Lenqth: The City's Street Design Policy limits the maximum length of uninterrupted
streets to 800 feet. This means that a street 800 feet or longer must have a knuckle or a "T'
intersection. The applicant had attempted to accommodate the requirements of the City's
Street Design Policy except for the length of 'E' Street. This street is designed to be
1,283 feet between "T' intersections. Staff informed the applicant early in the review process
that such a long uninterrupted street length is contrary to City design policy. The applicant,
however, disagrees with the design policy and has maintained the excessive uninterrupted
street length in the project design. Staff recommends that the street be redesigned to
conform to City design policy and a condition of approval requires same. The City's Traffic
division maintains that without such "interruption," an 800 foot long street will induce speeding
and therefore negatively impact the quality of life for the residents in the neighborhood. in
other areas of the City, attempts to control speed by signs has not proven effective.
G. Planninq Commission Workshops: The Planning Commission conducted two Pre-Application
Review workshops with the applicant on May 3, and August 12, 1998, Concerns expressed
during the first workshop related primarily to the increased density proposed. The
Commission felt that increasing density by relying on the Optional Development Standards
of the Etiwanda Specific Plan should only be undertaken if 'exemplary, innovative, and
special' design amenities would be provided. The applicant revised the plan to include parks
and trails for the second workshop. The Commission reacted favorably to the open space
elements, density transition, street scape design, and trails connecting major open space
elements proposed with the new plan and directed the applicant to work closely with Parks
Development and Planning staff on the open space elements. The applicant has been
working diligently with staff to that satisfaction.
H. Tree Removal Permit: The site contains remnant Eucalyptus windrows and a grove of Olive
trees that will have to be removed to accommodate the project. An arborist report was
prepared regarding the health of the trees. The arborist recommended preservation of the
Olive trees, which will be incorporated into the landscaping for the project. Many of the
Eucalyptus trees are not worthy of preservation due to potential structural weaknesses or
other reasons. The easterly windrow will be preserved in-place. Eucalyptus windrows
removed with the project will be replaced with new windrow planting in conformance with
Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements.
I. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Stewart, Fong) reviewed the
project on August 3, 1999, and requested the project be revised and brought back for further
review as a consent calendar item. The revised project was reviewed by the Committee
(McNiel, Stewart, Fong) on August 17, 1999, and the Committee recommended approval with
conditions, see Exhibit "H."
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
September 22, 1999
Page 4
J. Technical Review Committee: The Technical and Grading Review Committees have
reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to conditions outlined in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
K. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff
has completed Part II (Environmental Checklist). In completing the Initial Study checklist,
staff found that the site is located in an area recently identified by the U .S. Department of Fish
and Wildlife Service as potential habitat for endangered or threatened species. Habitat
assessment and biological surveys were required to determine potential habitat value and any
potential impacts, particularly to the federally-listed threatened California Gnatcatcher, the
endangered San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly.
Habitat assessment and protocol surveys were conducted by LSA Associates, Inc.,
consulting biologists permitted by the U ,S. Department Fish and Wildlife Service. The results
of the surveys indicate that the site contains 18.8 acres of undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial
Fan Sage Scrub that is high quality. Undisturbed sage scrub is closely associated with the
California Gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat; however, protocol surveys
detected neither species on-site. To mitigate the loss of this habitat it is recommended that
it be replaced off-site at a ratio of 1:1. The main food plant for the Quino Checkerspot
Butterfly, Plantago erecta, was not found on-site and focused surveys for the adult butterfly
were therefore not warranted. With mitigation, the proposed development of the 132 acre
site will not likely result in adverse effects to rare, threatened, or endangered animal species.
The project will also have potential impacts related to flooding, air quality (during
grading/construction), transportation (increased traffic trips), fire hazards (wildland interface),
geological problems (nearby fault systems), and cultural resources (grove of Olive trees).
With implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in the attached Initial Study and
Resolution of Approval, these potential impacts can be mitigated to a level of less than
significant. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration would be in order.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on
August 4, 1999 with surrounding homeowners. Approximately 20 homeowners in the vicinity of the
project site were in attendance. Concerns included:
A. Increased traffic in the area before and after construction and emergency access. The
applicant had a Traffic Impact Analysis/Congestion Management Program prepared to
determine necessary regional improvements necessary to mitigate increased traffic from the
project. There are several environmental mitigation measures and conditions of approval
requiring the developer to perform transportation related improvements to accommodate the
project.
B. Are homes to be one or two-story? Developer anticipates all two-story.
C. Home Price? Developer anticipates $240,000 to $300,000.
D. Home size? 2,400 square foot to 3,000 square foot.
E. How will project be phased? All one phase anticipated.
F. Time frame? Start grading early in 2000, start selling by June/July 2000, finish by 2001.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
September 22, 1999
Page 5
G. Will existing trees along the east boundary of the site be preserved? Eucalyptus trees along
east project boundary will be preserved in-place, Olive trees will be transplanted on-site, other
windrows will be removed and replaced per Etiwanda Specific Plan.
H. Schools overcrowding. Currently, children in area are bussed to schools in Fontana and
residents don't feel that's fair. They "pay extra" to live in Rancho Cucamonga but their
children have to go to school in Fontana. Etiwanda School District boundaries are not the
same as City boundary. Developer will pay State mandated school impact fees, which will
be charged at time of building permit issuance.
I. Fire Protection. Residents want a Fire Station in the area. Fire District is currently
conducting a "Fire Defense Study" to ascertain possible substations as needed. Homes are
required to have specialized construction techniques and fuel modification is required to
mitigate fire hazards.
J. Convenience Shopping Opportunities. Residents want a convenience store in the area so
they won't have to drive so far to shop. There is a property designated "Neighborhood
Commercial" on the south side of the unbuilt portion of Wilson Avenue to the west of the site
but it is uncertain when it may be developed.
K. Public parks are appealing but not if they will increase assessments. Only the homeowners
within the subject tract would be assessed for the public parks.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 600-foot radius of the project site. To date, staff has received a small number of phone calls, all
of which were basic inquiries about the development.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract
14759 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of
a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
City Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Master Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Open Space
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - Illustrative Sections
Exhibit "H" - Design Review Action Agendas
Exhibit "1" - Initial Study Part II
Resolution of Approval with Conditions and Mitigation Monitoring Plan
LEGEND
TRACT BOUNDARY
,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,..,,,,,,, 600' PERIMETER ZONE
SITE UTILIZATION MAP
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14759
~-.~\e,~ ~' "".--'T.~- b'~'~Z,e~"~t~ 1'4~/-.~ -,~1) RANCHO SUMMIT LLC
:REPARED BY: ALLARD ENGINEERING ~(p
0.32 1.1 AC AC l~
AC
0.63 AC
AC
6,67 AC
AC
AC
0.47
AC
0.10
0.22 AC ;).11 AC
0.58
-- 0.74 AC
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED
(oftaide of street
23.62 AC
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED
(outside of ~eat rkjht-d-,,~y)
23.62 AC
OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT
TENTATNE TRACT NO. 14759
PI~ BY': ~.I,~RO IE~GINI~ING
INDEX MAP - CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14759
'L--
=,-
OONCI::PTUA/QBADING PLAN
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 147,'~:3
I~q(::HO SUMMIt LLC
PLAN
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14759
RANCHO SUMMIT LLC
PLAN
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14759
CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. f4759 .
RANCHO I3UMiV,~' LLC
SI-L=E'rBOF~
~ CONCEPTUAL GRADING' PLAN
-, ~ ' ~,~ I~, ~' ~"":~/ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14759
' ~,'.~ ' -,' ,' :-- ' R~O ~M~ ,,c
· · ,//';7,. . ';" "'
/ ~ '/,~/, , -",
~., ,, ,~.-,, ,/,',, ;: ,-,.~, ;.~ ';., ?~'~::':,,?, ,,,';
CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14759
TYPICAL PARK
ENTRY ELEVATION
THEME FENCE'REAR
ACCE~ ELEVATION
Rancho Summit
TYPICAL CONCEPT ELEVATIONS
.
~ Rancho Summit WARDMAN BULLOCK SECTION
_,.~ INTERSECTION * SUMMIT
WARDMA~BULLOCK
ENTRY CONCEPT PLAN
ENTRY~ONCEPT ELEVATION
Rancho Summit ,~,,--,.~-
ENTRY ~ WILSON
CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Brent Le Count August 17, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT - The
proposed subdivision of 132 acres of land into 358 single family lots and 3 lettered lots for common
open space/parks totaling 28.7 acres in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre)
of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east and west sides of Wardman Bullock Road, north
and south of Summit Avenue - APN: 226-102-17.
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pare Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee reviewed the revised plans and recommended approval.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Brent Le Count August 3, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT - The
proposed subdivision of 132 acres of land into 358 single family lots and 3 lettered lots for common
open space/parks totaling 28.7 acres in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre)
of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east and west sides of Wardman Bullock Road, north
and south of Summit Avenue - APN: 226-102-17.
Desiqn Parameters: The site is surrounded to the north by single family homes across Wilson
Avenue, to the east by single family homes, to the west by a flood control channel, and to the south
by a flood control basin. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 3.5 percent. The site
-. -: , contains a grove of Olive trees required to be preserved per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Access
will 15e via an extension of Wardman Bullock Road connecting the current termini at Wilson Avenue
and at the southwest area of Tract 13566 and by an extension of Summit Road into the site
connecting with Wardman Bullock Road. A master planned access to the Etiwanda Northeast Park
to the west of the site is proposed.
The proposal is for subdivision only, home plans would be reviewed with a future Development
... Review application. The site is proposed to be developed ur'der both the Basic and Optional
Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The northeastern portion of the site (93
lots north and east of Wardman Bullock Road) would be developed under Basic Standards with the
remaining area south and west of Wardman Bullock Road under Optional Standards. The
Etiwanda Specific Plan requires green ways for projects developed under Optional Development
Standards. Green ways are required to be 10 feet to 20 feet wide, private trail easements to
connect private common areas with public areas. Three 'community parks' are proposed within
the project varying in size from 3.7 acres to approximately 8 acres. The southern two parks within
~'._~>, the Optional Standards area are proposed to be linked via a trail system following Wardman
Bullock Road and Summit Avenue. The third park is located in the Basic Standards portion and
is not connected to the greenbelt system. The applicant is currently working with Parks
Development staff on resolving park design issues.
Variances: The applicant is requesting to reduce the required building separation per Optional
bevelopment Standards from 20 feet to 15 feet to allow the construction of larger homes on the
small lots. Such a reduction would require the applicant to seek approval of a Variance and staff
does not believe findings can be established for granting of such. Furthermore, maximizing home
size on smaller lots would be contrary to the rural character of the Etiwanda area. The applicant
is also requesting reduced setbacks along Wardman Bullock Road because the City allowed the
portion of Wardman Bullock Road east of the subject site (Tract 13566) to have reduced parkway
dimensions (7 feet as opposed to 12 feet) due to inclusion of a public utility easement to make up
the additional 5 feet (the setback is taken off of the right-of-way/property line). According to
Engineering staff, the portion of Wardman Bullock Road, referenced by the applicant, was
approved and constructed subject to rules and regulations no longer in affect (such as permitting
curb adjacent sidewalks). Current City standards require a 12-foot wide parkway and the Etiwanda
Specific Plan requires setbacks to be based off the property line. Such reduction in setbacks would
also require approval of a Variance and there do not appear to be strong findings to justify.
Planninq Commission Workshops: The Planning Commission conducted two Pre-Application
Review workshops with the applicant on May 3rd and August 12th, 1998. Concerns expressed
during the first workshop related primarily to the increased density proposed. The Commission felt
that increasing density by relying on the Optional Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan should only be undertaken if 'exemplary, innovative, and special' design amenities would be
provided. The applicant revised the plan to include parks and trails for the second workshop. The
Commission reacted favorably to the open space elements, density transition, street scape design,
and trails connecting major open space elements proposed with the new plan and directed the
applicant to work closely with Parks Development and Planning staff on the open space elements.
DRC COMMENTS
)' . TT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
August 3, 1999
Page 2
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Provide a green way trail system to link each neighborhood with parks and trails. This
could take the form of pedestrian paseo connections between lots (for example: a paseo
between Lots 7 and 8 linking the Parcel A park site with the greenway trail on Wardman
Bullock Road, a paseo between Lots 73, 74, 75, 82, and 83 to link the 'J' Street cul-de-
sac/neighborhood pocket with the Parcel A park site).
2. Expand 'common landscape lot" on both sides of Wardman Bullock Road and Summit
Avenue. The "Conceptual Development Plan' booklet provided by the applicant and shown
to the Commission at the August 12, 1999 workshop, showed extensive landscape areas
on both sides of Wardman Bullock Road and Summit Avenue which appear to be
approximately one half the adjoining lot depth. The current proposal is about one fourth as
deep as the adjoining lots. The Community Trails on the south and west side of Wardman
Bullock Road and the south side of Summit Avenue should be paralleled by on-site
pedestrian pathways.
Secondan/Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues.:
1. Avoid having lots side-on to rear of adjacent lots such as Lots 74/75 in Parcel A, and 70/94
in Parcel B-2.
2. For 'T" intersections, plot lots to avoid headlight glare of oncoming traffic from the street.
3. Avoid having lots front onto "R" Street as it will function as a busier, collector level street,
4. Avoid straight sections of street longer than 800 feet. Streets "B" and "E" have almost 1000
foot long straight sections.
5. Wherever possible, make corner lots wider than interior lots to allow additional room for
buffering from side streets.
Code/Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Code or Planning Commission policy and
should be incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Replace existing Eucalyptus windrows with new on-site planrings per Etiwanda Specific
Plan at 50 linear feet per acre. (132 acres x 50 = 6600 linear feet of new windrow).
Windrows shall follow a 330 foot by 660 foot grid pattern. Windrows should be used along
the perimeter of the site to function as a landscape buffer similar to that portrayed in the
'Conceptual Development Plan' booklet provided by the applicant.
2. The existing Olive grove along the northern tract boundary is required to be preserved by
the Etiwanda Specific Plan. An arborist report for the project recommends that the trees
have value and should be transplanted. It is recognized that the trees are in conflict with
proposed improvements; therefore, transplant the existing Olive trees into on-site and street
~'I a s ~ng a d enhance with additional Olive tree planting.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
,. August 3, 1999
1'.'} Page 3
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised in light of the above
comments and brought back for further Committee review.
Attachments
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee requested that the project be revised in light of staff's comments and the following
additional comments be brought back for review as a Consent Calendar item. The applicant
agreed to the Committees direction and staff's comments.
1. The Variances requested (front yard setback reduction and building separation) would be
more appropriately requested with a formal Development Review submittal. The
Committee would prefer design solutions that do not rely upon variances.
2, It is recognized that the secondary design issues identified by staff may not be complied
with in an absolute fashion. So long as these items are minimized to the degree possible.
~ :9 3. The proposed 40-foot width of landscape swaths on Wardman Bullock Road and Summit
'Avenue are acceptable so long as the Community Equestrian Trails are paralleled by on-
site pedestrian pathways.
4. The applicant is willing to provide a green way trial system to link each neighborhood with
parks and trails as necessary to comply with Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements. The
applicant will work with staff to resolve this item.
" ~ :' · AREA AREA A-2
"' AREA D"l
., ...,
,...,.
_ . ....... ~~~
' ~ /gd? "
,~.;,-;--- - _.~ ...
ENTRY / INTEP, SECTION CONCEPT
;. , , ~ LI~.,~'
',EA B-3 OPEN SPACE CONCEPT
DOUBLE FP, ONTAGE
CONCEPT
United States Department of the Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Ecological Services
Cartsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Cadsbad, California 92008
RECEIVED
Brad Buller OCT I
Senior Planner
City ofRancho Cucamonga City of Flancho Cucamonc
10500 Civic Center Drive ~ qning Division
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Rancho Summit Development, Tentative Tract 14759, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino
County, Califomia
Dear Mr. Buller:
On August 25, 1999, we attended a meeting regarding potential impacts to biological resources from
the proposed Rancho Summit development, which involves a subdivision of 132 acres of land on the
Etiwanda alluvial fan, including 62 acres of coastal sage scrub, into 358 single-family lots. At the
meeting, we were informed that protocol surveys of the proposed project site failed to detect any listed
species, including the federally endangered San Bemardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriamiparvus,
"SBKR").
Survey results suggest that the abundance and distribution of SBKR have declined on the Etiwanda
alluvial fan in recent years. We remain concerned that the proposed development may result in the
"incidental take" of SBKR because:
· Previous surveys have documented the SBKR on and/or adjacent to the proposed project site,
and the proposed project site contains suitable habitat for the species that is contiguous with
areas known to now support SBKR. The subspecies was captured on, or immediately adjacent
to, the proposed development iite in 1992 (McKernan 1994; enclosed). Also, SBKR were
captured in contiguous habitat_i.lnmediately west of the proposed development site (i.e., lower
Etiwanda spreading grounds) during May 1999.
· The low densities and patchy distribution of SBKR makes this subspecies difficult to detect
during surveys. Furthermore, protocol surveys do not provide complete coverage of an area.
Hence, SBKR on the site may not have been detected during the recent surveys.
High frequency fluctuations in abundance of SBKR in response to variations in environmental
conditions can lead to rapid, dynamic changes in the spatial distribution of kangaroo rots, with
density ot~en varying 5-fold or more from year to year. Also, the high intrinsic reproductive
rate and mobility of kangaroo rats enable them to rapidly re-colonize areas of suitable, burnow
unoccupied, habitat. Hence, SBKR could rapidly expand into suitable habitat on the proposed
development site when environmental conditions are favorable and SBKR numbers increase.
Brad Buller 2
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended, prohibits the take of endangered
or threatened species, where take means "to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct." "Harm" is further defined to include
significant habitat modification or degradation that kills or injures listed species by significantly
impairing behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. To reiterate, the proposed
development may result in the incidental take of SBKR by impairing essential behavior patterns, like
dispersal, by impeding the expansion of the population during favorable environmental conditions.
Furthermore, the destruction of alluvial fan scrub will further isolate and fragment this population of
SBKR. Small, isolated populations have a high probability of extinction because they are susceptible
to stochastic events such as high variability in age and sex ratios, and catastrophes such as floods,
droughts, or disease epidemics. We maintain that a viable population of SBKR on the Etiwanda
alluvial fan is essential for the long-term survival and recovery of this subspecies.
In light of the above discussion, we recommend that the proponent of the Rancho Summit
development contact us to discuss ways to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate adverse effects to this
subspecies during the proposed development. Moreover, because development of the Rancho Summit
site may require incidental take authorization, a permit application pursuant to section 10 of the Act
may be required. Such applications must be accompanied by a habitat conservation plan (HCP) that
specifies the: l) impacts likely to result from the taking oflisted speeies, 2) measures the applicant
will undertake to monitor, minimize, and mitigate such impacts, and the funding that will be available
to implement such measures, and 3) alternative actions the applicant considered that would not result
in take, and the reasons why such alternatives am not being utilized. If the HCP and the application for
the permit meet the issuance criteria, then a permit authorizing incidental take will be issued.
We continue to be concerned about the rapid rate of development on the Etiwanda alluvial fan and
recommend a meeting between our staffs to discuss the long-term solution for this biologically diverse
region.
If you have any questions pertaining to these comments, please feel free to call P.J. White of my staff at
(760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
Assistant Field Supervisor
Enclosure
1-6-99-NFTA-9 ·
cc: Bill Storm, Rancho Summit, LLC
Robin Maloney-Rames, California Department of Fish and Game
Randy Scott, County of San Bernardino Land Use Services Department
SENSITIVE MAMMALS OF THE SAN SEVAINE CREEK PROJECT
Prepared for:
Southwestern Field Biologists
8230 F~t Broadway Blvd., Suite W8
Tucson, Arizona 85710-4002
Prepared by:
Robert L. McKernan
Biological Science Division
San Bernardlno County Muse-m
2024 Orange Tree Lane
Redlands, CA 92374
June 1994
INTRODUCTION
The primary objective in preparing this repor~ was to provide detailed information on
local distribution of seven mammal taxa in the vicinity of the San Savaine Creek Project Cl'able
1). Sufficient information is available through personnel and the mammal collections at the
Biological Science Division at San Bemardino County Museum to enable the lead consulting
titre, Southwestern Field Biologists to assess potential impacts of the San Savaine Creek
Project.
METHODS
The distribution of the 7 mammal taxa were derivedfrom museum specimens and
previous studies. No small mammal trapping was conducted specifically for this project.
However, Robert L. McKeman, Supervisor of Biological Collections at San Bemardino
County Museum (SBCM) has conducted over 5000 traps nights in the alluvial fan habitats
along the cismontane areas of the San Gabriel and San Bemardino Mountains. These specific
trapping locations include various habitats and substrate types in the vicinity of the San Savalne
Creek Project (Figure 1). Along with the wapping data from R. McKeman additional mammal
diswibutional data relative to the San Savaine Creek Project area was included from specimens
house in the SBCM mammal collections.
SENSITIVE MAMMALS
California Mastiff Bat Eumops perotis calffornicus
Distribution: The mastiff bat occurs from central California, southward to central Mexico
(Williams, 1986). The majority of the California mastiff bat populations are resident in the
state, however, some bats are thought to migrate from the colder areas and winter in lowland
areas (Williams, 1986). Historically, there are 14 records for Colton, southern San
Bemardino County (Vaughan, 1959). Over the last 30 years very few records of this species
1
Table 1. Sensitive Mammal Species of the San Savaine Creek Project
Status
Species Federal State Observed/Potential
Greater mastiff-bat FC2 CSC X
Eumops perotis californ~cus
San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit FC2 CSC X
Lepus ~al~fornicus bennetti~
Los Angeles pocket mouse FC2 CSC X
Peroqnathus lonqimembris brevinasus
San Diego pocket mouse FC2 CSC X
Chaetodipus fallax fallax
San Bernardino kangaroo rat FC2 CSC X
Dipodomys merriami parvus
Southern grasshopper mouse FC2 CSC X
OnVchomVs torridus ramona
San Diego deser~ woodrat FC2 CSC X
Neotoma leplda ~ntermedla
Status Codesz
FE Listed as Endangered by the USFWS
FT Listed as Threatened by the USFWS
C2 category 2 candidate for federal listing for which insufficient
biological information exists to suppor~ listing.
FSS Forest Service Sensitive Species
CSC CDFG 'Species of Special concern'
CFP California Fully Protected
have been documented in southern San Bernaxdino County. (Vaughan, 1959). However, in
1992 a roost site of approximately 70 mastiff bats were located at Summit School, Etiwanda
(McKernan, Unpublished dam). Summit School is located on Summit Avenue in the central
portion of section 28. In addition, during June 1993, 11 individuals were observed foraging
over F~t Etiwanda Creek (Appendix 1).
Habitat: This species appears to favor rugged, rocky areas where suitable crevices a~e present
for roosting and breeding. Mastiff bats have also been observed using bULldings for roosting
0h'illiams, 1986). Along the mountain fronts of the San Gabriel Mountains potential roosting
and breeding habitat exist. These areas are characterLzed by rugged rocky axe2s usually with
large cracks or crevices located along steep canyons, granite walls, and high open cliffs.
Within the San Savaine Creek project area steep canyon walls and cliffs are present along the
northern portions of section 14, 15, and 16.
-The mastiff bat also utilizes buildings and mature trees for 'roosting. Within the San
Sevaine Creek Project area their axe many eucalyptus tree wind-rows and non-native palms
which have been found to provide roosting sites for this species (McKeman, unpublished data).
Status: In southern California incidental information suggest that the mastiff bat populations
have declined considerably in recent years. Wittiaras (1986) indicates that reasons for the
decline of this species are the extensive loss of habitats due to urbanization of coastal basins,
marsh drainage, and cultivation of major foraging areas. Very Little current information exist
on population status, threats to the species populations, and roosting/breeding sites in southern
San Bernaxdino County. To better understand the status of this subspecies throughout
southern San Bernardino County surveys should be conducted to determine relative densities of
populations and location of occupied roosts. This species is a Category 2 candidate for federal
listing, a California Species of Special Concern, and a Forest Service Sensitive Species.
San Diego Black-tailed Jaclu'abbit Lepus caHfornicus bennettii
Distribution: Lenus ~ Ip~nnettii ranges from Ventura County south to northwest
Baja, California. This subspecies is restricted to coastal valleys of southern California.
Habitat: The San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit inhabits a variety of open habitats in coastal
valleys of southern California, principally coastal sage scrub, alluvial sage scrub, and
grasslands. Within the San Savaine Creek Project area this species is found throughout the
alluvial sage scrub habitats and non-grasslands habitats south of the mountain fronts (Appendix 2).
It has been observed utilizes rural residential areas, although this use is seems infrequent.
Status: The San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit wkich only occurs in coastal southern California
is declining due to habitat loss. Based on incidental infQrmation this species is now veT
Hmited in its distribution in the San Bemardino Valley mainly from urbanization. The San
Diego black-tailed jackrabbit is a Category 2 Candidate for federal listing, a California Species
of Special Concern, and a Forest Service Sensitive Species.
San Bernardlno Kangaroo Rat Dinodomvs merriami parvus
Distribution: This kangaroo rat is a subspecies of the wide ranging Metdam kangaroo rat of
the southern California deserts. The San Beraardino kangaroo ~at (SBKR) historically occurred
throughout San Bernardino and San Jacinto Valleys on the Pacific slope of southern California
in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The current distribution of this species has been
drastically reduced by ulJoa.niTation, agricultural land conversion, flood control projects, and
mining operations in alluvial wash habitats. Remnant populations exist in portions of southern
San Bernardino County, mainly in the Santa Ana River Wash, Lytle Creek Wash, and lower
Cajon Wash. There are only four present-day records from Riverside County (McKeman,
unpublished).
Habitat: This kangaroo rat prefers alluvial wash scrub in association with loose sandy soils.
Specific habitat preferences are alluvial scrub witlfin sandy terraces, braided channels, and
sandy alluvial deposits. The only known population of SBKR in the San Savaine Creek Project
area was located in 1992 adjacent to East Etiwanda Creek Channel (McKeman, unpublished)
(Appendix 4). TMs site is located along the eastern border of East Efiwanda Creek. This
pop-~fi,~n of SBKR's occupies a narrow sandy wash with California Buckwheat (Eriogonum
fasciculatum) sparsely distributed in a wash along the eastern border of l=n~t Etiwanda Creek
(Appendix 4). This remnant population was found distributed over and area less than 2 acres.
Status: The current status of this remnant population is currently unknown. Although, based
on the adjacent land activities, encroachment of non-native grasses and the stabili~tion of the
sandy wash habitat through channeliTation makes this small population of SBKR tenuous.
During 1992 SBCM trapping surveys indicated that the nature of the adjacent. land disturbances
and restriction of future fluvial processes within the occupied wash make survival of this
population bleak. Historic records, subsIrate, and habitats indicate that this species most likely
did not extend up l=~t Etlwanda Creek (McKeman, unpublished). The SBKR is a Category 2
candidate for federal listing, and California Species of Special Concern, and a Forest Service
Sensitive Species.
Los Angeles Pocket Mouse ~ IonL, imembris brevinasus
Distribution: The Los Angeles pocket mouse is restricted to lower elevation grassland, alluvial
sage scrub, and coastal sage scrub in cismontane southern California. Records extend from
Burbank and San Fernando in Los Angeles County to the northwest and to the City of San
Bemarclino, San Bemardino County. The subspecies extends eastward in the vicinity of the
San Gorg0nio pass in Riverside County, and possibly to north-central San Diego County.
Habitat: The habitat of the Los Angeles pocket mouse is lowland grasslands, coastal sage
scrub associations in Los Angeles basin, San Femando and San Bemardino valleys, to
Cabazon and Hemet, Riverside County (Willjams, 1986). The preferred habitat for this species
in cismontane San Bemardino and Riverside Counties is alluvial sage scrub, and those areai of
coastal sage scrub which are found on well drained benches. Historic specimen locations are
6
usually from areas which are well drained alluvial sediments.
Status: The decline of this species in the cismontane ~reas of San Bemardino, Riverside, and
San Diego Counties is directly related to the loss of coastal sage scrub habitats by land
conversion and u~anization.
The Biological Science Division of the San Bernardino County Museum has been
conducting trapping surveys throughout the San Bernardino Valley. Specific trapping locations
include lower Day Canyon Wash, ~t Etiwanda Creek, Lytle Creek, Cajon Wash, and Santa
Aria River Wash. Based on these upping surveys we have found the highest relative
abundance to occur in alluvial scrub habitats composed of compacted sandy soils with
perennial scrub cover of approximately 70%. Within the San Sevaine Creek Project area this
species has been trapped in the central and southwester~ portion of section 16, the southwest
portions of section 15, and a narrow portion of the central portion of section 21 (Appendix 5).
These occupied habitats are contain a fine compacted sandy substrate. Further trapping in
Spring 1993, and Summer 1993 trapping surveys conducted by San Bernardino Co. Museum
located a high relative abundance of Los Angeles pocket mice in Sections 16 and 17.
Additional trapping conducted in Sections 13, 15, 18 19, and 20 indicated this species is
potentially widespread in the alluvial sage scrub habitats on Ftn~ graveily soils.
Status: This species is currently a Category 2 candidate for federal listing, a California Species
of Special Concern, and a Forest Service Sensitive Species.
Sau Diego Pocket Mouse Chaetodipus fallax fallax
Distributiou: The San Diego pocket mouse (SDPM) ranges from Claremont, Los Angeles
County, San Bcrnardino Valley, and south through coastal southern California to Baja,
California.
Habitat: Habitat preference for SDPM-is coasual sage scrub and arid chaparral. Based on the
deeline of coastal sage scrub in seuthcrn California, this species' present population and status
is unknown. During past San Bcrnardino Co. Museum surveys, individuals were upped primarily
in alluvial fan sage scrub in Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20. Within the alluvial fan sage
scrub, this species was encountered with the greatest. frequency on loose sandy soils near
abraded areas.
Status: Similar. to the other sensitive small mammals direct impact would be unchecked sand
and gravel operations, flood control activities, and development of infrastructure. The current
status of this subspecies is a Category 2 candidate for federal listing, a California Species of
Special Concern, and a Forest Service Sensitive Species.
Southern Grasshopper Mouse ~ torridus ~
Distribution: The Ramona grasshopper mouse is ranges from San Fernando, Los Angeles
County south to Teeate Valley, Baja California. The ra~.ge appears restricted to lowland
coastal valleys in southern California.
Habitat: The Ramona grasshopper mouse is associated with Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage
Sc. rub. The presence of this subspecies appears closely tied to alluvial scrub habitats with
Yucca sD. in association with other perennial plants.
Status: Within the San Bernardino Valley the subspecies appears locally uncommon in the
Santa Ana River Wash near Highland, and along the northern flanks of the Badlands near
Loma Linda, San Bamardino County. As with other species associated with coastal ~age scrub
communities, the grasshopper mouse' s present status and distribution needs further
investigation in coastal southern California. in August 1993 the San Barnardino Co. Museum
trapped 3 individuals in Sections 17 (1), and 19 ('2) associated with dense areas of alluvial fan
sage scrub (appendix 6). This subspecies of grasshopper mouse is a Category 2 candidate for
federal listing, a California Species of Special Concern, and a Forest Service Sensitive Species.
San Diego Desert Woodrat p4eotom~ iepida intermedi____ a
Distribution: The San Diego desert woodra occurs form San Femando, Los Angeles County
south to Ensenada, Baja California. In southern California is restricted to cismontane lowland
habitats.
8
Habitat: This species reached its maximum abundance in alluvial Sage Scrub and coastal sage
scrub habitats in the coastal valleys of southem California. Within the San Bemardino Valley,
this rodent is one of the most abundant species encountered during Upping surveys in the
alluvial scrub (San Bernardino Co. Museum). Away from the steep mountain front, this
rodent can be found in a variety of habitat conditions along alluvial fans and the valley floor.
Within the San Savalne Creek Pwject area it is widely distributed (appendix 7),
Status: As with other species occurring in coastal sage scrub habitats, the desert woodmt's
suggested decline is based on loss of habitat. The status for this species is ategory 2
candidate, a California Species of Special Concern, and a Forest Service Sensitive Species.
I
Hall, E.R. 1981. The mammals of North America, 2nd. ed. John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1:1-600, 2:601-1181.
Vaughan, T.A. 1959. Functional morphology of the three bats: Eumops, Myotis,
Macroms. Univ. ofKanasas Publ., Mus. Nat. I-List., 12:1-153.
Willlanls, D.F. 1986. Mammalian species of special concern in California. Wildlife
Manag. Division Administrative Report. 86-1. California Department of Fish and Game.
APPENDIX
I
SCIENCE
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MUSEUM
San Diego Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus call[ornicus benuettii)
BIOLOGICAL .~ ,
SCIENCE
I
BIOLOGICAL ~ San Diego Pocket ~ouse (Chaetopldus fallax faU, ax)
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Tentative Tract 14759
2. Related Files: Pre-Application Review 98-09
3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 - ,/lIT - The proposed
subdivision of 132 acres of land into 358 single family lots lettered lots for common
open space/parks totaling 28.7 acres in the Low F (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located or sides of Wardman Bullock
Road, north and south of Summit Avenue - APN~ 102-17.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Lennar Homes
24800 Chrisanta Drive
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
5. General Plan Designation: Low
6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dweliir Etiwanda Specific Plan
7. Surrounding Land Uses and The site is surrounded to the north by single family
homes across Wilson Avenue, east by single family homes, to the west by a flood
control channel, and to the so~ by a flood control basin. The site slopes from north to
south at approximatel' The site contains a grove of Olive trees required to be
preserved per the ~. Access will be via an extension of Wardman
Bullock Road connecting current termini at Wilson Avenue and at the southwest area
of Tract 13566 and 1 extension of Summit Avenue into the site connecting with
Wardman Bullock Roa A master planned access to the Etiwanda Northeast Park to the
west of the site is
8. Lead Agency Nas and Address:
City of Ranl
Planning Divisi~
10500 Civic (:
Rancho Cul a, CA 91730
9. Contac Phone Number:
Brent
10. Other agencies whose approval is required: A Traffic Impact Analysis has been
completed for review by SANBAG.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
Tentative Tract 14759 ~
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS pOTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
Land Use and Planning (,/) Transportation/Circulation (v') Public Services
Population and Housing (v') Biological Resources (v') Utilities and Sen~ice ~
~ Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources 0/) Aesthetics
(~) Cultural
Water (e/) Hazards ( ) Recreation
, Air QuarRy (k/) Noise
(v') Mandato~ Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(v') I find that although the proposed project could effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the ~ct, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will ~repared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have ~ificant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT i,. ~red.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY I a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been analyzed in an ea~ier document pursuant to
applica~31e leg~ been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as ¢ ~ttached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Si i~cant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL PORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be ini~cant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation ares that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed:
.e Count, AICP
Associate planner
October 20, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact." "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discu of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proporal..
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental
policies adopted by agencies With jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (s/)
c) Be incompatible with existing
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Disrupt or divide the physical ;nt of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
The project is designed in conformant with the Basic and Optional Development Standards
of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No ~ density or plan amendment are proposed.
2. POPULATION AND HOU Would the proposal.'
a) Cumulatively ional or local
population ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
b) Induce substar growth in an area either
directly or inc (e.g., through projects in an
extension of major
() () () (~')
c) Displace housing, especially affordable
housing ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 4
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( )
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( )
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) (v')
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( (v')
h) Expansive soils? (v') ( ) ( )
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ~ ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
f, h) The site is located approximately '~ mil~ f ~ the Red Hill Earthquake Fault Zone.
A Geotechnical Investigation was prel: (Converse Consultants, January 20,
1998) to ascertain whether there ex geological or seismic constraints that
would impact the project. that the site is not located within an
identified earthquake fault zone ~ site is not susceptible to soil liquefaction, or
other seismic recommendations as outlined by Converse
-Consultants Preliminary ( Investigation of January 20,1998 shall
be complied with, inclu¢ but not limited to:
I. Site grading, eneral, shall include removal and replacement as
I . of all undocumented fill materials, flood control
dikes, and 2 to 5 feet of top soils and alluvial fan deposits.
Dee be required along the locally active channels within
natural le areas. Site grading would involve removal and disposal,
or o~ crushing, of considerable amounts of oversize material
cobbles and boulders. Site preparation would also include
re disposal of vegetation, weeds, brush, trees, debris piles,
pipes, and the concrete water tank.
2 Additional investigation and geotechnical exploration shall occur during
site grading to. assess collapse potential of matrix material comprising
silty sand with gravel and gravelly sand materials.
3. A detailed geotechnical investigation report, including detailed site
grading and preliminary foundation design and construction
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 5
recommendations, shall be prepared and submitted for review by the
City, prior to issuance of grading permits.
With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant.
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ) (v') ( ) ( )
c) Discharge into surface water or other.
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Changes in the amount of surface q any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Changes in currents,
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
f) Change in the c s, either
through direct additions or ~ or
through interception of cuts or
excavations. loss of
groundwater~ y? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Altered direction or of flow of groundwater?. ( ) ( ) ( ) (V')
h) 'Impacts to, luality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
i) Substantial ~ount of
.= available for public water
supplies? ) ( ) ( ) (V')
Comments:,
a, b) be altered because of the pawng and hard scape proposed.
R~ created by development of the site will be mitigated through the
a storm drain system, which will collect flows at the southwest
of the site and outlet into the San Sevaine Basin. Additionally, the
applicant is proposing to protect the site from runoff using drainage facilities.
A final drainage study will be prepared and reviewed for the design of the
facility, prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. If the applicant cannot
acquire off-site property interests necessary to build the drainage facilities,
the developer waives his right to recordation of the final map.
.The site is subject to potential flooding from the Etiwanda Creek wash. The project
Js proposed to be constructed on land that is designated as Flood Zone D on the
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 6
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), defined bythe Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) as areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. The applicant
has applied to FEMA for a change of zone designation and received a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). The applicant will be conditioned to process for
a Letter of Map Revision to remove the site from the Flood Zone D, prior to
recordation of the Final Tract Map.
5. AIR QUALI~. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( (~) ( ) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ' ) ( ) ( TM (~)
d) Create objed~onable odors~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
equipment exhaust as it is used Major sources of emissions dudng this
phase include exhaust onstmdion vehicles and equipment and
fugitive dust generated as a result ion vehicles and equipment traveling
over exposed sudaces, as weft disturbances by grading filling. Nox and
PM10 levels may be exceeded ~ a dally basis during construction; however,with
implementation of mitigati~ as listed below, impac~ will be
'reduced to less-than-signi levels.
Peak grading and ,n emissions may exceed the South Coast Air Quality
Management Distri~ th Is for the cdteria poliutant of Nox (2.5 tons per quatier)
and PM 10 (150 pou~ Emissions of other criteda pollutants would be
below the standards is a potentially significant impact, bu~ould be reduced
to a ant level with implementlion of mitigation measures as
listed below.
1. The co~ contractor shall select the construction equipment
used ~ based on low emission factors and high energy e~ciency.
The ~ ~trucfion contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
e a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
~ed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2. construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 7
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4. The construction contractor shall support and encourage ride sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retai~ on-site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control listed
below.
A. During clearing, grading, earth movin excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, wate or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust the site and to
create a crust after each day's activities ~
B. During construction, water trucks oa >rinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the At a minimum, this would
include wetting down sucl in the later morning and after
work is completed for l I whenever wind exceeds 15 miles
per hour.
C. After clearing, gradin k~ moving, or excavation is completed,
the entire area of soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until ~ area is paved or othenNise developed so
that dust generation not occur.
D. Soil stockpiled for two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with binders to prevent dust generation.
Eo Trucks trans soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point
6. The contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, preo
coated natu~ colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, am coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or
manual application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel,
spatula, rag, or sponge.
"
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (~') ( ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 8
~u~. and Suppo.~
b) Hazards to sabty from design features (e.g.,
sharp cu~es or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Insu~cient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ( ) (~)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (~)
q Con~i~s with adopted policies supposing
alternative tmnspo~ation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Rail or air tra~c impacts? ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
a) A Congestion Management Prog Impact Analysis (CMPfflA) study has
been prepared to determine whether the will cause increases in vehicle t~ps
or tra~c congestion in excess of projet ; for the adopted land use. The CMPfflA
(RKJK and Associates, Inc., March concluded that the proje~ may result
in excessive future tra~c con repo~ recommends ce~ain roadway and
freeway improvements to odate the proje~ generated tra~c. ~th the
following mitigations, expected to be significant,
1. The project will be to ins~ll fron~ge street improvemen~ in
their ultimate co uration, per Ci~ ordinance, and to pay
Transp¢ ~lopment fees for improvemen~ within the C i~ limi~
and CMP miti ees for improvemen~ ou~ide the Ci~ limits.
2. Summit Avem .hall be constructed curb-to~urb including street light,
tc ~ of the Ci~ Engineer, from the west project bounda~
to East Construction shall occur with the first phase of
developm The utilities off-site shall be relocated as necessa~. The
overhea~ lities on-site shall be under grounded.
3. ~ignals shall be ins~lled at the intersections of Wilson
Avert ~rdman Bullock Road and Summit Avenue~oung's Canyon
4. A or driveway connection to Hoppe Drive shall be provided for
y access to Tract 13566-2.
5. Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road shall be constructed full
width within the project boundaries with the fist phase of development.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 9
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ) ( ) ( )
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? (~) ( ) ( )
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, ripadan,
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration con' ( ) ( ) (,/) ( )
Comments:
a) The property is located in an ar 'ecently identified by the U.S. Department of Fish
and Wildlife Service as habitat for endangered or threatened species.
Habitat assessment and, surveys were required to determine potential
habitat value and particularly to the federally-listed threatened
California Gnatcatche~ endangered San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, and
Habitat assessment and protocol surveys
were conducted b' , Inc., consulting biologists permitted by the U.S.
Department Fish; Service. The results of the surveys indicate that the
site contains 62., 3oastal Sage Scrub (18.8 acres undisturbed Riversidian
Alluvial Fan ,< 20.36 acres disturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub,
and 23.32 ac of Buckwheat Scrub [monotypic sage scrub]). Undisturbed sage
scrub is ~ ' associated with the California Gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino
Kar however, protocol surveys detected neither species on- site.
Pursuar uidelines as contained in the Memorandum
of Und~ g between the City, County, and U.S. Department Fish and Wildlife
Servi (US DFWS) and California Department of Fish and Game, a project review
mee was held at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall on August 25, 1999. The
U-< recommended that the Coastal Sage Scrub on-site removed to
a project be mitigated by off-site replacement at a ratio of 3:1.
the 3:1 ratio does not appear to be based upon any scientific principles but
a preference of the Service. Of the 62.48 acres of on-site Coastal Sage
Scrub, 18.8 acres are considered undisturbed (undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub). Replacement of the undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
at a ratio of 1:1 appears reasonable. Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-
site lands to provide substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the undisturbed
Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub that would be lost through project
implementation. The main food plant for the Q uino Checkerspot Butterfly, Plantago
erecta, was not found on-site and focused surveys for the adult butterfly were
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 10
therefore not warranted. The study indicates that five sensitive s
or Federal lists) were found on-site including Monarch butterfly, N< Harrier,
Golden Eagle, Loggerhead Shrike, and Southern California
Sparrow. However, available information does not
as rare, threatened, or endangered, With mitigation, the ~pment of
the 132 acre site will not likely result in adverse threatened, or
endangered animal species.
b) The project will cause the removal of many rows of E~ The applicant
has filed a Tree Removal Permit for c Planning Commission. The
Etiwanda Specific Plan allows Eucalyptus to be removed to
accommodate a project subject to rel with new windrow planting of
5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata at 8-foot The existing Eucalyptus
windrow along the east project boundary a significant landscape buffer
between the subject property and the exis homes in Tract 13566 to the east.
This windrow shall be :. The site also contains a Coast Live
Oak tree which should be either in place or transplanted on-site.
The impact is not considered si
c) See Comment a) Sage Scrub. The site contains a grove
of Olive trees desig~ ,rvation by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. An
arborist study (Harmsorth December 1998) was conducted which
indicates that the trees are of preservation and recommends they be
transplanted. The project removal by transplanting the Olive
trees to statement on Wardman Bullock Road per the
Conceptual Landscape ;ubmitted with the application. With mitigation, the
impact is not ini~cant.
d) There appear to be drainage courses through the site. Very little water has
several years due to flood control efforts to the northwest
_of the site. There no anticipated impact.
e) The site ma to some degree as a habitat linkage but construction of the
Route 30 to the south would prevent future linkage value of the site.
Furthermore site is surrounded to the south and west by open space/flood
control which could continue to provide a habitat linkage in the area.
The im considered significant.
8. ENERGY AND I~INERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') .
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) (
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 11
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion
hazardous substances (includin limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals. >? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Possible interference with ency
response plan or emergency plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) The creation of any health h; potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Exposure of sources of
potential health ( ) ( ) ( ) (s/)
e) Increased fire hazard with fiammable
brush, grass, ( ) (~/) ( ) ( )
Comments:
e) The site the "Wildland/Urban Interface" zone and is therefore
subject to fis mitigation requirements, which may include vegetation
manageme specialized home construction methods, and other
requireme The current application involves subdivision only, no home designs
are Specialized home construction techniques will be assessed with a
Review submittal. A condition of approval requires compliance
with District requirements. With such mitigation, the impact is not considered
signif
t0. NOISE. Willtheproposalresultin:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (,/) ( ) -
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 12
Comments:
a, b) The project will increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant. The site is
not indicated to be in an area of excessive future noise by the General Plan. The
southern edge of the site lies over 1,000 feet north and west of the Route
30/Interstate 15 interchange separated from the interchange by a flood control basin;
therefore, future freeway noise is not expected to impact the site. Noise that does
reach the site from the south will be attenuated by construction of a tract perimeter
wall along the south boundary and by typical home construction technic~ues. The
impact is not considered significant.
1 t. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) schools? ( ) ( ) (v) ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a) _The site fails within the LndlUrban Interface" zone and is therefore
subject to fire hazard mil requirements, which may include vegetation
management, ' home construction methods, and other
requirements. The cu~ dication involves subdivision only, no home designs
are proposed. tome construction techniques will be assessed with a
future Development ~mittal. A condition of approval requires compliance
with Fire ,rements. With such mitigation, the impact is not considered
significant.
c) The Etiwanda fi District has commented on several prior projects that school
facilities are rcrowded and in need of improvement and expansion. The
app pay the State mandated school impact fees, prior to building
permit iss With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 13
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Local or regional water treatment or distributio
facilities? ( ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ( ) ( )
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
e) The project will result in loft due to roofed and hard scape areas,The
project will be required 1 l local drainage facilities as necessary.
13. AESTHETICS. Wouldt
a) Affect a scenic sta or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v9
b) Have a deml ative aesthetic effect?
( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Create lare? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
Comments:
c) The se light and glare since the site is currently vacant. However,
ghting will be consistent with surrounding neighborhoods.
14. SOURCES. Would the proposah
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) (f) ( )
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) (~) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 14
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) (~ (~) ( )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
( ) ()
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
Commlh:~otential impa~ area? ~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
(RMW Paleo Associates, Inc, De~ ~ber 1998) to assess potential cultural,
archeological, and historical resour identi~ mitigation, if necessa~. The
study found that the lack su~cient integrity to be considered for
pmse~ation c ~ister of Historic Resources. However,
the study does recommend ~lanting the Olive trees on-site. The project
design includes trans I existing Olive trees to main intemections such
as Wardman Bullock and Summit Avenue. The study also recommends
that grading/ground activities in the no~hern half of the site be
monitored by a ist due to the possibili~ that sub-surface deposi~
of historic ~ld be located on*site.
15. RECREATION. proposak
a) Increase the, ghborhood or
regional pa~; or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Affect exis recreational oppo~unities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
The ned in conformance with the Basic and Optional Development Standards
of the ~cific Plan, No increase in density or plan amendment are proposed.
The proje~ ake advantage of the Optional Standards provisions for maximizing
density bL his is offset by provision of three large public parks within the proje~. The three
parks wil oppo~unities for homeowners within the tract and in
the Vici~ ~. There is ~ impact
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 15
Impact Less
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, ~use a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, redu~ the number or restdct the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate impo~ant examples of the major
pedods of California histo~ or prehisto~? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Sho~ te~: Does the project have the
to achieve sho~-term, to the disadvan
long-term, environmental goals? (A
impa~ on the environment is occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive
Long-term impacts will endure
future.) ( ) ( ) ( )
c) Cumulative: Does the have
are individually limited, bu sy
considerable? 'considerable"
means that the ' effects of a project
are consider; viewed in connection
with the effects of projects, the effe~s of
.other and the effe~s of
probable future ( ) ( ) (~) ( )
d) Subs~ntial Does the project have
envir< effe~s which will cause
substantia effects on human beings,
either dir or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
c) of the proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited,
considerable. The proposed project will pay development impact
~y the City, the rates of which have been designed to mitigate the
protection seaices, police protection seaices, parks or other
recreational facilities, and other govemmental se~ices to a level of non-significance.
To the e~ent the project may impact upon utility resources provided by private utility
companies. potential ~mpacts upon such resources will be mitigated by the paymept
of rates and charges to these companies.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 16
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where. pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available fgr'~eview in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices. 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(v') General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(v')Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 G neral Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(v') Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR
(SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 17
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES:
Geological Problems:
All recommendations as outlined by Converse Consultants Preliminary ~ation
of January 20, 1998 shall be complied with, including but not limited to:
1. Site grading, in general, shall include removal and replacement as pacted fills
of all undocumented fill materials, flood control dikes, and the u feet of top soils and
alluvial fan deposits. Deeper removal may be required along the ' active channels within
natural drainage areas. Site grading would involve or on-site crushing.
of considerable amounts of oversize material comprisir cobbles and boulders. Site
preparation would also include removal and dis weeds, brush, trees,
debris piles, buded irrigation pipes, and
2. Additional investigation and geotechnical lall occur during site grading to assess
collapse potential of matrix material Ity sand with gravel and gravelly sand
materials.
3. A detailed geotechnical investigation report, ~cluding detailed site grading and preliminary
foundation design and construction recom~ shall be prepared and submitted for
review by the City, prior to issuance of gr
Air Quality:
1. The construction contractor shall sel
emission factors and high energy The construction contractor shall ensure that
construction grading plans incluc ~t that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance, manufacturer's specifications.
2. The construction utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in-lieu of
gasoline-powered engines
3. shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement
that work crews will in use. During smog season (May through
October), the overall le period should be extended, thereby decreasing
the size of the area ch day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the
same time.
4. Ipport and encourage ride sharing and transit incentives
for the constructi crew.
avation, or transportation of cut or fill
materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving
the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 18
B. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas
of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum,
this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is
completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.
C. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire are~ of
disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area
or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur.
D. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or with soil
binders to prevent dust generation.
E. Trucks transporting soil, sand. cut or fill materials,
the site shall be tarped from the point of origin.
6. The construction contractor shall utilize as much as possibl ~re-coated-natural colored
building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating transfer or spray equipment
with high transfer efficiency, such as hig (HVLP) spray method, or
manual coatings application such as paint brush , trowel, spatula, dauber, rag,.or
sponge.
Transportation:
1. Summit Avenue shall be c including street lights, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer, from the west East Avenue. Construction shall occur
with the first phase of development. ~ff-site shall be relocated as necessary. The
overhead utilities on-site shall be under
2. Traffic signals shall be of Wilson Avenue/Wardman Bullock Road
and Summit Avenue/Young's Can
3. A street or driveway connectio Drive shall be provided for secondary access to
Tract 13566-2.
4. Summit Avenue Ilock Road shall be constructed full width within the project
boundaries with the first of development.
5. The project will be uired to install frontage street improvements in their ultimate
configuration, per ordinance, and to pay Transportation Development fees for
im the City limits and Congestion Management Program mitigation fees for
improvements o the City limits.
Water/Flooding:
1. The absor be altered because of the paving and hard scape proposed. Runoff
created I ~ment of the site will be mitigated through the installation of a storm drain
will collect flows at the southwest corner of the site and outlet into the San
Sevaine Basin. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to protect the site from runoff using
drainage facilities. A final drainage study will be prepared and reviewed for the design of the
facility, prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. If the applicant cannot acquire off-site
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 19
property interests necessary to build the drainage facilities, the developer waives his right to
recordation of the Final Tract Map.
Biological Resources:
1. All of the existing Olive trees on-site deemed worthy:of transplantation
shall be transplanted to be included in on-site landscaping.
2. - The existing Eucalyptus windrow along the east proj be preserved and
protected in-place as it serves a significant buffering function, trees within the
windrow may be removed if they are found to be the future
subject to replacement at a ratio of 1: 1 with minimum 5-gallo Maculata at 8 feet
on center per the Etiwanda Specific P!an,
3. Eucalyptus windrows removed to ect shall be replaced with new
windrow planting of minimum 5-gallon Eucal at 8-foot spacing at a rate of
50 linear feet of new windrow per acre..
4. The Coast Live Oak tree shall either be planted on-site. If the tree
is damaged during transplantation a minimum 48-inch
box sized Coast Live Oak.
5. Purchase and preserve (in lands to provide substitute resources at a ratio
of 1:1 for the undisturbed Riversidian. Fan Sage Scrub that would be lost through
project implementation. Off site be located within the Etiwanda Fan, shall be
undisturbed and high quality, uous to a preserve area.
Hazards:
1. The site falls wi Interrace' zone and is therefore subject to fire hazard
mitigation requirements as vegetation management, specialized home construction
methods, and other requ' to comply with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's
Standards for the high fia
Cultural Resources:
1. Per the of RMW Archeological Survey report dated December 1998,
grading/ground activities in the northern half of the site shall be monitored by an
archaeologist dL 'that sub-surface deposits of historic era remains could be
located on site.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 20
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures t,o,avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would
occur.
Signature: Date:
Print Name and Title:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for pubtic review in accordance with the
Ca~fornia Environmental Qua~ty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 14759 Public Review Period Closes: October 27, 1999
Project Name: Rancho Summit Project Applicant: Lennar Homes
Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the eastand west sides of Wardman Bullock Road,
north and south of Summit Avenue -APN: 226-102-17.
Project Description: Theproposedsubdivisionof132acresoflandinto358singlefamilylotsand31ettered
lots for common open space/parks totaling 28.7 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine If the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
October 27, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 25, 1999
TO: Design Review Committee
FROM: Brent Le Count, AICP, AssoCiate Planner:~'Z.L/''
SUBJECT: INITIAL STUDY PART II FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
Please substitute the attached revised Initial Study Part II for Tentative Tract 14759 (Rancho
Summit) in your Planning Commission packet delivered October 21,1999. The revisions pedain
to issues raised by the California Department of Fish and Game in their letter of September 21,
1999. Note that pursuant to Section 15074.1 of the California State CEQA Guidelines, no
recirculation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is necessary so long as any new mitigation
measures are equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects.
The only revised mitigation measure is Number 5 under Biological Resources, which contains more
specific requirements for off-site mitigation for removal of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub.
This revision was included in the proposed Resolution of Approval for the project transmitted to
you last Thursday.
Please don't hesitate to call me should you have any questions.
BLC:mlg
cc: Planning Commission
Brad Buller
Dan Coleman
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
'1. Project File: Tentative Tract 14759
2. Related Files: Pre-Application Review 98-09
3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT - The proposed
subdivision of 132 acres of land into 358 single family lots and 3 lettered lots for common
open space/parks totaling 28.7 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east and west sides of Wardman Bullock
Road, north and south of Summit Avenue - APN: 226-102-17.
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Lennar Homes
24800 Chrisanta Drive
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is surrounded to the north by single family
homes across Wilson Avenue, to the east by single family homes, to the west by a flood
control channel, and to the south by a flood control basin. The site slopes from north to
south at approximately 3.5 percent. The site contains a grove of Olive trees required to be
preserved per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Access will be via an extension of Wardman
Bullock Road connecting the current termini at Wilson Avenue and at the southwest area
of Tract 13566 and by an extension of Summit Avenue into the site connecting with
Wardman Bullock Road. A master planned access to the Etiwanda Northeast Park to the
west of the site is proposed.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Brent Le Count
(909) 477-2750
'10. Other agencies whose approval is required: A Traffic Impact Analysis has been
completed for review by SANBAG.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page ?
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
! ( ) Land Use and Planning (~) Transportation/Circulation (~') Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (v') Biological Resources (~/) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (~') Aesthetics
(v') Water (~/) Hazards (~) Cultural Resources
(~) Air Quality (f') Noise ( ) Recreation
(~') Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(v') I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment. and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Brent Le Count, AICP
Associate Planner
October 25, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
I potentially
, ' '"'r:;nt ,;
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposah
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
The project is designed in conformance with the Basic and Optional Development Standards
of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, No increase in density or plan amendment are proposed.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Induce substantial gro~h in an area either
directly or indiredly (e.g., through projeds in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( (~)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ) ( ) ( (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 4
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v")
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( )
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) (,/) ( ) ( )
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( )
h) Expansive soils? ( ) (V) ( ) ( )
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
f, h) The site is located approximately % mile from the Red Hill Eadhquake Fault Zone.
A Geotechnical Investigation was prepared (Converse Consultants, January 20,
1998) to ascertain whether there exist any geological or seismic constraints that
would impact the project. The study found that the site is not located within an
identified earthquake fault zone and the site is not susceptible to soil liquefaction, or
other seismic activities/hazards. All recommendations as outlined by Converse
Consultants Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation of January 20,1998 shall
be complied with, including but not limited to:
1. Site grading, in general, shall include removal and replacement as
process compacted fills of all undocumented fill materials, flood control
dikes, and the upper 2 to 5 feet of top soils and alluvial fan deposits.
Deeper removal may be required along the locally active channels within
natural drainage areas. Site grading would involve removal and disposal,
or on-site crushing, of considerable amounts of oversize material
comprising cobbles and boulders. Site preparation would also include
removal and disposal of vegetation, weeds, brush, trees, debris piles,
buried irrigation pipes, and the concrete water tank.
2. Additional investigation and geotechnical exploration shall occur during
site grading to assess collapse potential of matrix material comprising
silty sand with gravel and gravelly sand materials.
3. A detailed geotechnical investigation report, including detailed site
grading and preliminary foundation design and construction
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 5
recommendations, shall be prepared and submitted for review by the
City, prior to issuance of grading permits.
VVith mitigation, the impact is not considered significant.
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: S~mn~rac~nt ' S
4. WATER, Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) (V') ( ) ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen. or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a, b) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hard scape proposed.
Runoff created by development of the site will be mitigated through the
installation of a storm drain system, which will collect flows at the southwest
corner of the site and outlet into the San Sevaine Basin. Additionally, the
applicant is proposing to protect the site from runoff using drainage facilities.
A final drainage study will be prepared and reviewed for the design of the
facility, prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. If the applicant cannot
acquire off-site property interests necessary to build the drainage facilities,
the developer waives his right to recordation of the final map.
The site is subiect to potential flooding from the Etiwanda Creek wash. The project
is proposed to be constructed on land that is designated as Flood Zone D on the
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 6
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), defined by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) as areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. The applicant
has applied to FEMA for a change of zone designation and received a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). The applicant will be conditioned to process for
a Letter of Map Revision to remove the site from the Flood Zone D, prior to
recordation of the Final Tract Map.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) (V') ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (v') ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
a, b) Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and
equipment exhaust as it is used on-site. Major sources of emissions during this
phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and
fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling
over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading filling. Nox and
PM10 levels may be exceeded on a daily basis during construction; however, with
implementation of mitigation measures, as listed below, impacts will be
reduced to less-than-significant levels.
Peak grading and construction emissions may exceed the South Coast Air Quality
Management District thresholds for the criteria pollutant of Nox (2.5 tons per quarter)
and PM10 (150 pounds per day). Emissions of other criteria pollutants would be
below the standards. This is a potentially significant impact, butwould be reduced
to a less-than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures as
listed below.
1. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
The construction contractorshall ensurethatconstruction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 7
use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of
the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size
of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment
operating at the same time.
4. The construction contractor shall support and encourage ride sharing
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below.
A. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to
create a crust after each day's activities cease.
B. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles
per hour.
C. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed,
the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so
that dust generation will not occur.
D. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist,
or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
E. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6. The construction contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or
manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel,
spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
Potentially I
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (v') ( ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 8
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g.. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a) A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) study has
been prepared to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle trips
or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The CMP/TIA
(RKJK and Associates, Inc., March 15, 1999) concluded that the project may result
in excessive future traffic congestion. The report recommends certain roadway and
freeway improvements to accommodate the project generated traffic. W~th the
following mitigations. the impact is not expected to be significant.
1. The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in
their ultimate configuration, per City ordinance, and to pay
Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City limits
and CMP mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits.
2. SummitAvenue shall be constructed curb-to-curb including street lights,
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, from the west project boundary
to East Avenue. Construction shall occur with the first phase of
development. The utilities off-site shall be relocated as necessary. The
overhead utilities on-site shall be under grounded.
3. Traffic signals shall be installed at the intersections of Wilson
Avenue/VVardman Bullock Road and Summit Avenue/Young's Canyon
Road.
4. A street or driveway connection to Hoppe Drive shall be provided for
secondary access to Tract '13566-2.
5. Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road shall be constructed full
width within the project boundaries with the fist phase of development.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 9
sT;;.;,
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or mm species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? (~) ( ) ( )
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? (~) ( ) ( )
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? (~) ( ) )
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) (~) )
e) ~ldlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) (~) )
Comments:
a) The prope~y is located in an area recently identified by the U .S. Depa~ment of Fish
and ~ldlife Se~ice as potential habitat for endangered or threatened species.
Habitat assessment and biological su~eys were required to determine potential
habitat value and any potential impacts, pa~icularly to the federally-listed threatened
California gnatcatcher, the endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and
endangered Quino checkerspot bu~e~y. Habitat assessment and protocol su~eys
were conducted by LSAAssociates, Inc., consulting biologists pertained by the U.S.
Depa~ment Fish and ~ldlife Seaice. The results of the su~eys indicate that the
site contains 62.48 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub (18.8 acres undisturbed Riversidian
Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, 20.36 acres disturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub,
and 23.32 acres of Buckheat Scrub [monotypic sage scrub]). Undisturbed sage
scrub is closely associated with the California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino
kangaroo rat; however, protocol su~eys detected neither species on-site. The scrub
habitat area is therefore considered to be of unoccupied status. Pursuant to the
Interim Project Review Guidelines as contained in the Memorandum of
Undemtanding be~een the City, County, and U.S. Depadment Fish and Wildlife
Se~ice (USDFWS) and California Depa~ment of Fish and Game, a project review
meeting was held at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall on August 25, 1999. The
USD~S recommended that the Coastal Sage Scrub on-site removed to
accommodate the project be mitigated by offisite replacement at a ratio of 3:1.
However, the 3:1 ratio does not appear to be based upon any scientific principles but
is rather a preference of the Se~ice. Also, the 3:1 ratio is typically only applied to
occupied habitat and in this case the habitat on site is unoccupied by threatened or
endangered species. The Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub on-site, while
determined high quality, does not have long term viability. This type of plant
community must have 50 to 100 year floods to su~ive over time. Past flood control
effo~s to the noah and west have cut off water drainage to the habitat area, thereby
limiting it's long term viability. Of the 62.48 acres of on-site Coastal Sage Scrub, 18.8
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 10
acres are considered undisturbed (undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage
Scrub). Replacement of the undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub at a
ratio of 1:1 appears reasonable. The replacement area will be located within the
Etiwanda Fan contiguous to existing preserve areas and unconstrained by flood
control improvements. The disturbed sage scrub and buckwheat scrub on site does
not appear worthy of preservation as it is relatively poor quality and has a lower
species diversity than undisturbed areas. Also, disturbed sage scrub is typically only
utilized by threatened or endangered species when there is no undisturbed habitat
in the vicinity and there is high quality undisturbed sage scrub nearby. The
undisturbed habitat is relatively isolated in that it is not necessary to provide a habitat
linkage. Purchase and preserve {in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide
substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial
Fan Sage Scrub that would be lost through project implementation. Off site
land shall be located within the Etiwanda Fan, shall be undisturbed and of
high quality, and contiguous to the existing preserve areas. The main food
plant for the Quino checkerspot butterfly, Plantago erecta, was not found on-site and
focused surveys for the adult butterfly were therefore not warranted. The study
indicates that five sensitive species (not on State or Federal lists) were found on-site
including Monarch butterfly, Northern harrier, Golden eagle. Loggerhead shrike, and
Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow. However, available information does
not show that these species qualify as rare, threatened, or endangered. With
mitigation, the proposed development of the 132-acre site will not likely result in
adverse effects to rare. threatened, or endangered animal species.
b) The project will cause the removal of many rows of Eucalyptus trees. The applicant
has filed a Tree Removal Permit for consideration by the Planning Commission. The
Etiwanda Specific Plan allows Eucalyptus windrows to be removed to
accommodate a project subject to replacement with new windrow planting of
5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata at 8-foot spacing. The existing Eucalyptus
windrow along the east project boundary provides a significant landscape buffer
between the subject property and the existing homes in Tract 13566 to the east.
This windrow shall be preserved in-place. The site also contains a Coast Live
Oak tree which should be either preserved in place or transplanted on-site.
The impact is not considered significant.
c) See Comment a) above regarding Coastal Sage Scrub. The site contains a grove
of olive trees designated worthy of preservation by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. An
arborist study (Harmsorth Associates, December 1998) was conducted which
indicates that the trees are worthy of preservation and recommends they be
transplanted. The project design mitigates removal by transplanting the olive
trees to provide enhanced entry statement on Wardman Bullock Road per the
Conceptual Landscape Plan submitted with the application. With mitigation, the
impact is not considered significant.
d) There appear to be two drainage courses through the site. Very little water has
reached the drainages in several years due to flood control efforts to the northwest
of the site. Representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the California
Department of Fish and Game have visited the site and it has been determined that
the drainages do not fall under Federal or State jurisdiction. There is no anticipated
impact. Refer to letter from Department of Fish and Game confirming that the
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 11
drainages are not subject to Streambed Alteration Permits. Furthermore, no
wetland/riparian habitat has been found on site (October 8, 1999 letter from LSA).
e) The site may function to some degree as a habitat linkage but construction of the
Route 30 Freeway to the south would prevent future linkage value of the site. The
site is surrounded by existing residential development to the north and east.
Furthermore, the site is surrounded to the south and west by open space/flood
control improvements which could continue to provide a habitat linkage in the area.
At best, the habitat on site is the terminus of a "finger" of potential habitat extending
down from the undeveloped land to the northwest. The site does not link otherwise
disconnected patches of habitat. Furthermore, the Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage
Scrub on site, while determined high quality, does not have long term viability. This
type of plant community must have 50 to 100 year floods to survive over time. Past
flood control efforts to the north and west have cut off water drainage to the habitat
area, thereby limiting irs long term viability. The impact is not considered significant.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy
conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Use non-renewable resources in a
wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would
be of future value to the region and ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
the residents of the State?
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to: oil, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) '
emergency evacuation plan?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 12
c) The creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~')
d) Exposure of people to existing
sources of potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with
~ammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) (~) ( ) ( )
e) The site falls within the "WildlandlUrban Interface" zone and is
therefore subject to fire hazard mitigation requirements, which may
include vegetation management, specialized home construction
methods, and other requirements. The current application involves
subdivision only, no home designs are proposed. Specialized home
construction techniques will be assessed with a future Development
Review submittal. A condition of approval requires compliance with Fire
District requirements. With such mitigation, the impact is not considered
significant.
~ 0. NOISE. ~11 the proposal resuff in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ) ( (~) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise ) ( (~) ( )
levels?
Comments:
a, b) The project will increase noise levels since the site ~s currently vacant.
The site is net indicated to be in an area of excessive future noise by the
General Plan. The southern edge of the site lies over 1,000 feet north
and west of the Route 30/Interstate 15 interchange separated from the
interchange by a flood control basin; therefore, future freeway noise is
net expected to impact the site. Noise that does reach the site from the
south will be attenuated by construction of a tract perimeter wall along
the south boundary and by typical home construction techniques. The
impact is not considered significant.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 13
L Potentially I
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal
have an effect upon or result in a need for
new or altered government se~ices in any
of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) (~) ( ) ( )
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (V) ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, ( ) ( ) ( ) (Y)
including roads?
e) Other governmental sewices? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
a) The site falls within the "Wildland/Urban Interface" zone and is
therefore subject to fire hazard mitigation requirement, which may
include vegetation management, specialized home construction
methods, and other requirement. The current application involves
subdivision only, no home designs are proposed. Specialized home
construction techniques will be assessed with a future Development
Review submittal. A condition of approval requires compliance with Fire
District requirements. ~th such mitigation, the impact is not considered
significant.
c) The Etiwanda School District has commented on several prior projects
that school facilities are overcrowded and in need of improvement and
expansion. The applicant will pay the State mandated school impact
fees, prior to building petit issuance. ~th mitigation, the impact is
not considered significant.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
Would the proposal result in a need for
new systems or supplies or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 14
Signeft, ant
Impact Less
Polentially Unless Than
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (~/) ( ) ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Comments:
e) The project will result in increased runoff due to roofed and hard scape
areas. The project will be required to construct local drainage
facilities as necessary.
t3. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ( ) ( )
highway?
b) Have a demonstrable negative
aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Create light or glare? ( ) (~) ( )
Comments:
c) The project will increase light and glare since the site is currently vacant.
However, the residential lighting will be consistent with surrounding
neighborhoods.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) (f) ( )
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) (v') ( )
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (V') ( ) -
d) Have the potential to cause a
physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 15
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
area?
Comments:
a-c) The site contains an old reservoir, an Olive grove, structural remains,
and remnants of an irrigation system. A Cultural Resources
Reconnaissance study was conducted (RMW Paleo Associates, Inc,
December 1998) to assess potential cultural, archeological, and
historical resources and identify mitigation, if necessary. The study
found that the resources on-site lack sufficient integrity to be considered
for preservation or inclusion on the California Register of Historic
Resources. However, the study does recommend transplanting the
Olive trees on-site. The project design includes transplanting
existing Olive trees to main intersections such as Wardman Bullock
Road and Summit Avenue. The study also recommends that
grading/ground disturbing activities in the northern half of the site
be monitored by an archaeologist due to the possibility that sub-
surface deposits of historic era remains could be located on-site.
RECREATION. Would the proposah
a) Increase the demand for
neighborhood or regional parks or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational ( ) ( ) ( )
opportunities?
Comments:
The project is designed in conformance with the Basic and Optional
Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No increase in density
or plan amendment are proposed. The project does take advantage of the
Optional Standards provisions for maximizing density but this is offset by
provision of three large public parks within the project. The three parks will
provide needed recreational opportunities for homeowners within the tract and
in the vicinity. There is no impact
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 16
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE,
a) Potential to degrade: Does the
project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate impo~ant examples of the
major periods of Calibrnia histo~ or
prehisto~?
b) Shod term: Does the project have
the potential to achieve shod-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A shod-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time, Long-term ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
impacts will endure well into the
future,)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have
impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other ( ) ( ) (~) ( )
current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
d) Subs~ntial adverse: Does the
project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either ( ( ) ( ) (~)
directly or indirectly?
Comments:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 17
c) Adoption of the proposed project will not have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. The proposed project
will pay development impact fees established by the City, the rates of
which have been designed to mitigate the potential impacts to fire
protection services, police protection services, parks or other
recreational facilities, and other governmental services to a level of non-
significance. To the extent the project may impact upon utility resources
provided by private utility companies, potential impacts upon such
resources will be mitigated by the payment of rates and charges to these
companies.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR. or other
CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier
EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified
above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the
following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this initial Study and are
available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices,
10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(v') Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(v') Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR
(SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga :
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 18
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES:
Geological Problems:
All recommendations as outlined by Converse Consultants Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation of January 20, 1998 shall be complied with, including but not limited to:
1. Site grading, in general, shall include removal and replacement as processed
compacted fills of all undocumented fill materials, flood control dikes, and the
upper 2 to 5 feet of top soils and alluvial fan deposits. Deeper removal may
be required along the locally active channels within natural drainage areas.
Site grading would involve removal and disposal, or on-site crushing, of
considerable amounts of oversize material comprising cobbles and boulders.
Site preparation would also include removal and disposal of vegetation,
weeds, brush, trees, debris piles, buried irrigation pipes. and the concrete
water tank.
2. Additional investigation and geotechnical exploration shall occur during site
grading to assess collapse potential of matrix material comprising silty sand
with gravel and gravelly sand materials.
3. A detailed geotechnical investigation report, including detailed site grading and
preliminary foundation design and construction recommendations, shall be
prepared and submitted for review by the City, prior to issuance of grading
permits.
Air Quality:
3. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-
site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The
construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a
statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
4. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment
in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
5. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the
construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the
area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the
same time.
6. The construction contractor shall support and encourage ride sharing and
transit incentives for the construction crew.
7. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site and
kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 19
A. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of
cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to
prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's
activities cease.
B. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to
keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from
leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such
areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and
whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.
C. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the
entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the
soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust
generation will not occur.
D. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
E. Trucks transporting soil, sand. cut or fill materials. and/or construction
debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin.
8. The construction contractor shall utilize as much as possible pre-coated
natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and
coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high
volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application
such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber. rag, or sponge.
Transportation:
1. Summit Avenue shall be constructed curb-to-curb including street lights, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, from the west project boundary to East
Avenue. Construction shall occur with the first phase of development. The
utilities off-site shall be relocated as necessary. The overhead utilities on-site
shall be under grounded.
2. Traffic signals shall be installed at the intersections of Wilson
AvenueANardman Bullock Road and Summit Avenue/Young's Canyon Road.
3. A street or driveway connection to Hoppe Drive shall be provided for
secondary access to Tract 13566-2.
4. Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road shall be constructed full width
within the project boundaries with the first phase of development.
5. The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in their
ultimate configuration, per City ordinance, and to pay Transportation
Development fees for improvements within the City limits and Congestion
Management Program mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 20
Water/Flooding:
1. The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hard scape
proposed. Runoffcreatedbydevelopmentofthesitewillbemitigatedthrough
the installation of a storm drain system, which will collect flows at the
-southwest corner of the site and outlet into the San Sevaine Basin.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing to protect the site from runoff using
drainage facilities. A final drainage study will be prepared and reviewed for the
design of the facility, prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. If the
applicant cannot acquire off-site property interests necessary to build the
drainage facilities, the developer waives his right to recordation of the Final
Tract Map.
Biological Resources:
1. All of the existing Olive !tees on-site deemed worthy of transplantation by a
certified arborist shall be transplanted to be included in on-site landscaping.
2. The existing Eucalyptus windrow along the east project boundary shall be
preserved and protected in-place as it serves a significant buffering function.
Individual trees within the windrow may be removed if they are found to be
diseased, dead, or dangerous in the future subject to replacement at a ratio of
1:1 with minimum 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata at 8 feet on center per the
Etiwanda Specific Plan.
3. Eucalyptus windrows removed to accommodate the project shall be replaced
with new windrow planting of minimum 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata at 8-foot
spacing at a rate of 50 linear feet of new windrow per acre.
4. The Coast Live Oak tree shall either be preserved in-place or transplanted on-
site. If the tree is damaged during transplantation or construction, it may be
replaced with a minimum 48-inch box sized Coast Live Oak.
5. Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide substitute
resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage
Scrub that would be lost through project implementation. Off site land shall be
located within the Etiwanda Fan, shall be undisturbed and high quality, and be
contiguous to a preserve area.
Hazards:
1. The site falls within the 'VCildland/Urban Interface' zone and is therefore
subject to fire hazard mitigation requirements such as vegetation
management, specialized home construction methods, and other requirements
to comply with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Standards for the high
fire hazard zone.
Cultural Resources:
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 14759 Page 21
1. Per the recommendations of RMW Archeological Survey report dated
December 1998, grading/ground disturbing activities in the northern half of the
site shall be monitored by an archaeologist due to the possibility that sub-
surface deposits of historic era remains could be located on site.
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I
acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation
measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby
agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects
to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur.
Signature: Date:
Print Name and Title:
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AppROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 14759, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 358 SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS AND 3 LETTERED LOTS FOR COMMON OPEN SPACE/PARKS
TOTALING 18.3 ACRES ON 132 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST
SIDES OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH OF
SUMMIT AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 226-102-17.
A. Recitals.
1. Rancho Summit has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract No. 14759,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative
Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 22, and 29, and October 27, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded
said headng on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined. and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 22, and 29, and October 27, 1999, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Wilson Avenue
east and west of Wardman Bullock Road and north and south of Summit Avenue with a street
frontage of 1,800 feet on Wilson Avenue and lot depth of 3,300 feet and is presently improved
with a derelict building foundation, an old reservoir, an olive grove, an Oak tree, and Eucalyptus
windrows. The site is in a Flood Zone "D" at the southeastern area of the Etiwanda (Alluvial) Fan
and slopes from north to south at approximately 3.5 percent. The elevation difference across the
site is appreximately 115 feet. There are two remnant drainage courses through the site that no
longer carry much water due to flood control efforts to the north and west of the site. Further
drainage improvements will be conducted on-site and off-site to the north and west to protect the
site from flooding. Vegetation on-site includes Riversidian Alluvial Fan Scrub, which is a plant
community known to support habitat for threatened and endangered species. There is a grove
of Olive trees on-site, which are required to be preserved by the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and developed with single
family homes, the property to the south consists of a flood control basin, the property to the east
is developed with single family homes, and the property to the west is vacant and improved with
flood control facilities; and
.,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'Fr 14759 - RANCHO SUMMIT
October 27, 1999
Page 2
c. A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared
for the project to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle tdps or traffic
congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The project will be required to install
frontage street improvements in their ultimate configuration, per City ordinance, and pay
Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City limits and Congestion
Management Program mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits. This will reduce
traffic related impacts to a less than significant level; and
d. The application is for subdivision purposes only, home and lot-by-lot landscape
design would be reviewed with a future Development Review submittal; and
e. The project is proposed to be developed under both the Basic and Optional
Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Increased density is offset by inclusion
of three public parks within the project, which will provide recreational opportunities both for future
residents within the tract and for the surrounding area; and
f. The project site is potential habitat for threatened or endangered species (i.e.,
California Gnatcatcher and San Bemardino Merdam Kangaroo Rat, respectively) and biologicel
surveys were conducted by a permitted biologist in accordance with the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service protocols. The protocol surveys concluded that the species were not found; and
g. The project site is potential habitat for an endangered species, the Quino
Checkerspot Butterfly, and a habitat assessment was conducted and determined that, because
of a lack of host plants, the site does not support adequate habitat and the species is not present;
and
h. The project site contains 18.8 acres of undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage
Scrub, the removal of which will be mitigated in an off-site mitigation land bank; and
i. The project site is located within the "VVildland/Urban Interface" zone and San
Bemardino County Fire Safety Oveday District; and
j. The existing Eucalyptus tree windrows will be replaced with newwindrow planting
in conformance with the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
k. The existing Olive trees will be transplanted to be included in on-site landscaping;
and
I. Air quality impacts related to construction activities will be mitigated by following
techniques recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District; and
m. The site does not fall within an identified Seismic Special Studies Zone but the
Red Hill Earthquake Fault Zone lies approximately one-half mile to the north. Specialized grading
methods supervised by a geologist is required to mitigate potential seismic hazards; and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
.;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'l'l' 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 3
b. The design or improvements of the Tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause sedous public health problems; and
f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record. for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application. the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;. that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and. further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are
listed below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannin,q Division
1) Provide pedesthan connections between cul-de-sac Streets "J," "0,"
"P," and "S" and Wardman Bullock Road.
Ato3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'IF 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 4
2) For '"T" intersections, plot homes to avoid headlight glare of oncoming
traffic from the street as much as possible.
3) Provide retaining walls as necessary to maximize useable roar and
comer side yard aroas.
4) The decorative entry monumentation shall be located completely on-
site, out of the public right-of-way and shall be maintained by the
Homeowners' Association.
En,qineedn.q Division
1) Right-of-way shall be acquirod for Summit Avenue from the west
project boundary to East Avenue, in conjunction with the standard
condition rogarding condemnation. The north half shall be fully
dedicated per figuro 5-39 of the Etiwanda specific Plan. The south
half shall be dedicated 23 feet wide as measurod from the street
centedine. The existing school site at the northeast comer of East
Avenue and Summit Avenue is fully improved, no additional right-of-
way will be requirod at this location.
2) Summit Avenue within the project boundaries shall be constructed 71
feet wide, per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Proposed additional
parkways will be designed per City Standards and policies, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
3) The extension of Summit Avenue northeast of the Wardman Bullock
Drive intersection shall have a street right-of-way of 66 feet with a
curb-to-curb street dimension of 44 feet.
4) The southwest leg of the Summit Avenue intersection shall have a 44
foot curb-to-curb street dimension for a distance of 250 feet.
5) A paved roadway with a minimum of two-way traffic from Wilson
Avenue to East Avenue shall be provided for at all times.
6) The street and storm drain plans for Wilson Avenue, full width, from
Wardman Bullock Road to 1,140 feet west of the west project
boundary shall be prepared, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7) Wardman Bullock Road/Young's Canyon Road within the project
boundaries shall be constructed 102 feet wide, per the Etiwanda
Specific Plan. Proposed additional parkways will be designed per
City Standards and policies, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,
The developer shall be eligible to roceive transportation fee credit and
reimbursement consistent with the policy towards the portions of
Wardman Bullock Road and Young's Canyon Road that are classified
as backbone.
8) Stroet "B" at the easterly terminus shall be designed as a standard
cul-de-sac, with the eastem curb face set 2 feet from the property
line, standard cul-de-sac right-of-way.
.:
I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 5
9) The drainage issues shall be resolved, to the satisfaction of all
involved agencies, pdor to recordation of the Final Map as follows:
a) A final drainage study shall be prepared. In addition to the
design and sizing of the drainage facilities for the project, the
cun'ent drainage patterns and hydrology shall be discussed.
The study will determine how much flow is being routed to the
Etiwanda system and how much flow to the San Sevaine
system. Drainage systems proposed with this development
shall not increase flows to the Etiwanda system.
b) The ultimate regional improvements including the Upper
Etiwanda Regional Mainline Channel and the debds basin north
of Wilson Avenue shall be bonded for, have approved plans,
and be under construction; or interim facilities shall be bonded
for and approved.
c) Facilities to protect the site from local flows shall be designed,
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d) The developer, at his sole expense and effort, shall acquire all
easements necessary to accommodate ultimate, local. and/or
interim facilities. In the event the developer is not able to
acquire the necessary off-site right-of-way, the Final Map shall
be disapproved per Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 66473 of the
Subdivision Map Act.
e) Maintenance responsibility of the drainage facilities that will be
constructed to protect the site from local flows is undeterrnined.
Appropdate measures shall be taken to provide for the
maintenance.
10) Indicate school bus stop locations. If curb lane is less than 20 feet.
a bus bay shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Any amendments to the tentative map resulting from the necessity of
a bus bay shall be the responsibility of the developer.
11) An Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment shall be precessed to reduce
the southedy parkway of Wilson Avenue from Wardman Bullock Road
to 1,400 feet west of Wardman Bullock Road, where the Metropolitan
Water District feeder line moves to the south side of Wilson Avenue,
pdor to approval of the Final Map. The parkway shall be reduced
from 65 feet to 38 feet and maintain the proposed meandering bike
path and equestrian trail, If denied, an amended Tentative Tract Map
shall be processed to indicate the required Wilson Avenue dght-of-
way and the new lot layout.
12) The'~tandard parkways and trails along Wardman Bullock Road,
Young's Canyon Road, Summit Avenue, and Wilson Avenue will be
annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. All other areas
proposed for public maintenance will be annexed into the newly
created district.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
Tr 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 6
13) The Tentative Tract will be conditioned to form and join a new
assessment district, which will maintain the additional park lands and
widened parkways. The district will be formed with an escalator to
allow for increases in maintenance costs without a vote.
14) Consultant shall check with the Engineering Division for landscape
design information pertaining to Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson
Avenue.
15) The Community Trail along the south project boundary shall be
20 feet wide. A connection to the existing trail to the east,
constructed with Tract 135662, shall be designed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. The developer shall acquire any off-site dg. ht-of-
way necessary to design the trail to City Standards, pnor to
recordation of the adjacent phase of the map,
16) The local residential streets shall be constructed with property-line-
adjacent sidewalk.
17) The developer is providing three parks as part of the project. The
parks will be of varying sizes and be designed to encourage different
levels of community activity. The 7.94-acre park will have a parking
lot, community trail access. restroom facility, minimal ball fields, and
open space. The 6.67-acre parkwill be a standard neighborhood park
with programmed ball fields, restroom facili~, parking lot, and open
space. The 3.73-acre park will be a passive park with curbside
parking. a tot lot, restrooms, and open space as follows:
a) A parkway trail connecting the parks shall be provided, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b) The tree parks shall be constructed in accordance with the
recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Commission with
the boundaries of the subdivision, in- lieu of payment of park
fees.
c) The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to
provide for the construction of the parks in-lieu of paying park
fees, subject to City Council approval.
d) Each park shall be fully constructed upon completion of one-half
of the units within each respective parcel: the 46th unit for
Parcel A, the 90th unit for Parcel B, and the 42nd unit for Parcel
C.
e) The Park and Recreation Commission shall approve the park
design, including grading for each park, prior to respective map
approval.
f) All dedicated park lands are to be located on non-restricted
developable, unencumbered lands. This includes. but is not
limited to clear title, no easements, no seismic faults, no grades
greater than 10 percent, and free from flood hazard.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'iF 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 7
g) It is acknowledged that the proposed location of the 7.94 acre
park has a combined 2:1 and 3:1 slope occurring on the eastern
most edge. This area will be landscaped with planter areas and
cobbles to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
h) The frontages of the parks within Parcels B and C shall be
posted R26 "No Parking."
Environmental Mitigation Measures
Geological Problems - All recommendations as outlined by Converse
Consultants Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation of January 20. 1998,
shall be complied with, including but not limited to:
1) Site grading, in general, shall include removal and replacement as
processed compacted fills of all undocumented fill materials, flood
control dikes, and the upper 2 to 5 feet of top soils and alluvial fan
deposits. Deeper removal may be required along the locally active
channels within natural drainage areas. Site grading would involve
removal and disposal, or on-site crushing, of considerable amounts
of oversize material comprising cobbles and boulders. Site
preparation would also include removal and disposal of vegetation,
weeds, brush, trees, debris piles, buded irrigation pipes. and the
concrete water tank.
2) Additional investigation and geotechnical exploration shall occur
during site grading to assess collapse potential of matrix material
comprising silty sand with gravel and gravelly sand materials.
3) A detailed geotechnical investigation report, including detailed site
grading and preliminary foundation design and construction
recommendations, shall be prepared and submitted for review by the
City, prior to issuance of grading permits.
Air Quality
1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy
efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction
Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will
be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers
specifications.
2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
Plans include a'statement that work crews will shut off equipment
when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the
overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
._. Noq
I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 8
4) The construction contractor shall support and encourage ride shadrig
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below:
a) During cleadng, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or spdnkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and
to create a crust after each day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is
completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated
immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or
otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur.
d)Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials, and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6)' The construction contractor shall utilize as much as possible pre-
coated natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC
coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer
efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method,
or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller,
trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
Transportation
1) Summit Avenue shall be constructed curb-to-curb including street
lights on both sides and sidewalk on the north side, to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer, from the west project boundary to East Avenue.
Construction shall occur with the first phase of development. The
utilities off-site shall be relocated as necessary. The overhead utilities
on-site shall be under grounded per the City's under ground utility
policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover the cost of permanent off-site improvements from future
development of the off-site properties fronting Summit Avenue. If the
developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six
months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all
rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'1'1' 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 9
2) A traffic signal shall be designed and installed for the intersection of
Wilson AvenueRVardman Bullock Road and a traffic signal shall be
designed for the intersection of Summit Avenue/Young's Canyon
Road. The developer shall be eligible for fee credits toward and
reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development
Fee, in conformance with City policy.
3) A street connection to Hoppe Ddve shall be provided for secondary
access to Tract 13566-2.
4) Summit Avenue, Young's Canyon Road, and Wardman Bullock Road
shall be constructed full width, including street lights and sidewalk,
within the project boundaries with the first phase of development.
Completion of parkway landscaping may be deferred with phased
final maps.
5) The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in
their ultimate configuration, per City ordinance, and to pay
Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City
limits and Congestion Management Program mitigation fees for
improvements outside the City limits.
6) The project's congestion Management Prograrnrl'raffic Impact
Analysis (CMP/TIA) study identified traffic impacts at three locations,
which will result in an unacceptable level of service unless mitigated.
The TIA has also determined the amount of this project's fair share
contribution to these mitigations. A cash payment in-lieu of
construction as ccntdbution for the following future projects shall be
paid, pdor to the issuance of building permits or Final Map approval,
whichever occurs first, in the following amounts:
Amount Recipient Aqency Future Proiect
$16,037 City of Rancho Cucamonga Installation of a future traffic
signal at the intersection of
Cherry Avenue and Young's
Canyon Road.
$12,264 City of Fontana Installation of a futuro traffic
signal at the intersection of
Cheny Avenue and Summit
Avenue/I-15 Freeway
frontage road.
$17,792 City of Fontana Instaliationofafuturatraffic
signal at the intersection of
' Cherry Avenue and Carter
Avenue.
Water/Flooding
1) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and
hard scape proposed. Runoff created by development of the
site will be mitigated through the installation of a storm drain
.;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 10
system, which will collect flows at the southwest comer of the
site and outlet into the San Sevaine Basin. Additionally, the
applicant is proposing to protect the site from runoff using
drainage facilities. A final drainage study will be prepared and
reviewed for the design of the facility, pdor to recordation of the
Final Tract Map. If the applicant cannot acquire off-site property
interests necessary to build the drainage facilities, the developer
waives his dght to recordation of the Final Map.
Biological Resources
1) All of the existing Olive trees on-site deemed worthy of
transplantation by a certified arbodst shall be transplanted to be
included in on-site landscaping.
2) The existing Eucalyptus windrow along the east project
boundary shall be preserved and protected in-place as it serves
a significant buffedng function. Individual trees within the
windrow may be removed if they are found to be diseased,
dead, or dangerous in the future subject to replacement at a
ratio of 1: 1 with minimum 5-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata at 8 feet
on center per the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
3) Eucalyptus windrows removed to accommodate the project shall
be replaced with new windrow planting of minimum 5-gallon
Eucalyptus Maculata at 8-foot spacing at a rate of 50 linear feet
of new windrow per acre.
4) The Coast Live Oak tree shall either be preserved in-place or
transplanted on-site. If the tree is damaged during
transplantation or construction, it may be replaced with a
minimum 48-inch box sized Coast Live Oak tree.
5) Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide
substitute resources at a ratio of 1:1 for the undisturbed
Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub that would be lost through
project implementation. Off-site land shall be located within the
Etiwanda Fan, be undisturbed and high quality, and contiguous
to a preserve area.
Hazards
1) The site falls within the "Wildland/Urban Interface" zone and is
therefore subject to fire hazard mitigation requirements such as
vegetation management, specialized home construction
methods, and other requirements to comply with the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire District's Standards for the high fire hazard
zone.
Cultural Resources
1 ) Per the recommendations of RMW Archeological Survey report
dated December 1998, grading/ground disturbing activities in
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 27, 1999
Page 11
the northern half of the site shall be monitored by an
archaeologist due to the possibility that sub-surface deposits of
historic era remains could be located on-site.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chain'nan
ATTEST:
Bred Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day
of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
._- fill/
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 14759 o Rancho Summit
This Mitigation Monitodng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner. assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
sddress:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TT 14759 - Rancho Summit
October 20, 1999
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for appreving any such refinements or additions,
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City, These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 14759 Applicant: Rancho Summit
Initial Study Prepared by: Brent Le Count Date:. October 20, 1999
Site grading shall include removal &replacement of BO C Ongoing NC 2/4
undocumented fill materials, flood control dikes. top
soils& all fan deposits
Additional investigation & geotechnical exploration BO C Ongoing NC 2/4
during site grading to access collapse potential
Geotechnical repo i of grading, foundation design & BO B Prior to C 2
construction recommendations construction
permits
Installation of storm drain system &final drainage CE B Final map D
study 1
recordation
Selection of low-emission construction equipment. CP/BO B/C Plan check C/A 2/4
Utilization of electric or diesel-powered equipment CP/BO C Ongoing A
where feasible 4
Grading Plans state equipment shut off when not in CP/BO C Plan check C 2
use. Extend construction period during smog season
(May-October)
Ride sha~in9 & transit incentives encouraged for CP/BO C Ongoing A 4
construction crew
Dust control measures to be utilized CP/BO C Ongoin9 A 4
Utilization of pre-coated natural colored building CP/BO B/C Ongoing A 4
materials where possible and, low pollution coatings
and application methods
I
MITIGA~ON MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE 14759 Page 2
Summit Avenue construction including street lights & CE A I st phase A 3/4
sidewalk
Design & installation of traffic signal at Wilson Ave./ CE B lstruction A
Wardman Bullock Rd. and design of signal for
Summit Ave./Young's Canyon Rd.
Provide street connection to Hoppe Drive for access CE B NC
to Tract 13566-2
I st phase A 314
Construction of Summit Ave., Young's Canyon Rd., & construction
Wardman Bullock Rd. including street lights &
sidewalk
Install frontage street improvements and pay CE BD ,r to 1/3/5
Transportation Development fees for improvements occupancy
within City limits and Congestion Management
Program mitigation fees for improvements outside
City limits 112
Fair share cash payment to proper agency with B Prior to D
issuance of
respect to CMP/TIA study: building
$16,037 to City of Rancho Cucamonga for traffic permits or
signal at Cherry Ave./Young's Canyon Rd. Final Map
$12,264 to City of Fontana for traffic signal at approval,
Cherry Ave. & Summit Ave./I-15 Freeway whichever
frontage road occurs first
$17,792 to City of Fontana for traffic signal at
Cherry Ave./Carter Ave.
Transplantation of healthy Olive trees CP B/C Prior to NC 2/4
grading
permit
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 Page 3
Preservation of Eucalyptus windrow along east CP B/C Pdor to A/C 2/4
boundary and replacement of diseased trees within grading
same
,, permit
Replacement of Eucalyptus windrows removed to CP B/C Prior to NC 2/4
accommodate project grading
permit
Preservation or transplantation of Coast Live Oak CP B/C Pdor to NC 2/4
tree grading
permit
Pumhase and preservation of off-site habitat for
Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
C Ongoing A 2/4
activities in northern half of site
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
CDD - Commun~ DevelOpment Dim~or A - ~th Ea~ New Development A - On-site Ins~ion 1 - W~hhold Re~ation of Final Map
CP - Ci~ P;a,,,,ef or designee B - Pdor To Constrenton B - ~het Agen~ Pe~ I ~pmval 2 - W~hhold Grading or BuMing Petit
CE - C~ Engin~r or dd~gnee C - ~roughout Constrenton C * Plan Che~ 3 - ~ffihold Ce~;~[e of O~upan~
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Subm~al (Repo~s I Studies I Plans) 4 - Stop Wo~ O~er
PO - Poli~ Captain or designee E - O~rating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or ~esignee 6 - Revoke CUP
I:~NNING~I~L~LNGCOMM~NVDOC~I4759mm che~list,w~
I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 14759
SUBJECT: Sinqle family subdivision
APPLICANT: Lennar Homes
LOCATION: south side Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE pLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
;ompletlon Date
General Requirements
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense anyaction brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents. officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission. if building
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans. architectural elevations. exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein
Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
Project No, Tr14759
Compleuon Date
2. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
4. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers. etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls. berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed n underground vaults.
5. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Adicles of Incorporation of the /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever
said information changes.
6. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscope maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / /
lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice
requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of
construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
8. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. Ira double wall / /
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developershall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing wails/fences along the project's
perimeter.
9. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each /
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two ~/~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high
winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall
extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
10. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant.
11. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link
to maintain an open feeling and enhance views.
12. On corner side yards. provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. /
13. For residential development, return walls and comer side wails sha~i be decorative masonry. __
14. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be '/
manufactured products. --
I
pmjectNo, 11'14759
;ompletlon Date
Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping __/__/__
in the case of residential development, shaft be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier .__/.__/
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
3. Aft private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than __/ ./
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater I
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gaffon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shaft also include one 5-
gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted
in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section
shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
5. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously __ __/__
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold
and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units. an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the I
Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the
required street trees and slope planting.
7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included __/__/__
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, Olive tree / /
relocation, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is
required along Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road.
9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas __/__ __
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
10.' Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and __/__ __
approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth
characteristics of the selected tree species.
-/
11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water (for model homes only) through
the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code.
3
Pmjed No. 'IT 14759
Completion Date
12. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear / /
feet per acre. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the
City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100).
E. Environmental
1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required
to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy),
the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior
to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual
qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
F. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /
marked with the project file number (i.e., 'IF 14759). The applicant shall camply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and
Safety Division for availability of the Code AdOption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to __ / /
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,
Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant
.shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit
ISSUanCe.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation __/ /
and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday /
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
G. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to '/
perform such work.
3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. __/__ __
14,,1 0
proiectNo. Tr14759
Completion Date
4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a
California Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
H. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets. __
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal
encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or
tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails,
etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
· street centerline):
X 48 total feet on Wilson Avenue east of Wardman Bullock Road -- -/--
X 79 total feet on Wilson Avenue west of Wardman Bullock Road subject to Plan __
Amendment
3. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. ----/----/
4. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for __/__ __
approved openings: Wilson Avenue, Summit Avenue. Wardman Bullock Road, Young's Canyon
Road.
5. All existing easements lying within future rights--of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on __./.__ __
the final map.
6. Additional ~treet right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, and bus bays, to provide
a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. if curb adjacent sidewalk is used along
the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
7. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such
time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement
shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained
by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior
to commencement o~ the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to:
Summit Avenue.
r
I. Street ImproV6ments
/
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos,
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City
Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,
AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
5
Pn)jectNo. TT14759
Completion Date
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: /
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and oredays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (el In-lieu fee.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and appreved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed tO the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Pdor to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / /
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or / /
reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shaft be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shaft be installed on all comers of intersections per City
Standards or as diretied by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cress sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be appreved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
sc-~25~99
i
pmjed No. 1'1' 14759.,
Completion Date
5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with__/__/__
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
J, Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall/ /
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape
Maintenance District: Wilson Avenue, Wardman Bullock Road, Young's Canyon Road, Summit
Avenue, interior trails and parks.
2. Public landscape areas am required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble __ / ./
or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the/__ __
developer until accepted by the City,
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood/
protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer.
2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed
from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and
hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be
obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever
occurs first, A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to building permit
issuance.
3. Afina~drainagestudysha~~besubmittedt~anda~~r~vedbytheCityEngineerpri~rt~fina~map
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its /
right-of-way.
5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe __/__
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage __ __/__
in a sump catch basin on the public street.
L. Utilitie,~ "*/ * '
Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __/__
1.
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
7
Projec~ No. TT 14759
Comp et on Date
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance
from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs
first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map
approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects.
M. General Requirements and Approvals
1. Etiwanda/San SevaineArea Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage /
Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is
involved.
2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: San /
Bemardino County Flood Control. --
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community /
Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance ' '
of building peaTnits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer.
4. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for / /
all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
5. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed __ / /
beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the
approved tentative map.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer __ / /
shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in,
or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the
development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time
recordation of the final map occurs.
2. Fire flow requirement Shall be: 1,500 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) / /
(Increase).
a. A~re~owShallbeconductedbythebuilder/developerandwitnessedby~redepartment / /
personnel prior to water plan approval.
b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants '/ /
shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel
after construction and prior to occupancy.
pmjectNo. TF14759
Compiet on Date,
3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, __./
and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i .e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
/
4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided priorto water plan approval. Required hydrants,
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to __
final inspection.
6. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: __/__/__
X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. __ -- I--
/
X Other: Wildland interface requirements.
7. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. /--- --
8. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, __/__ __
6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus.
9. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho /
Cucamonga Fire protection District as follows:
X . $132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
10. Project is located in a high fire hazard area and is subject to special wildland/urban interface
hazard mitigation requirements. Such requirements may include requirements related to
vegetation management plans, special construction enhancements, emergency access, water
supply, automatic fire extinguishing systems, and other special requirements. AN EXTRA SET
OF PLANS IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING AND SAFETY
DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. THE BUILDING AND
SAFETY DEPARTMENT COORDINATES ALL PLAN SUBMITTALS AND WILL FORWARD
THE EXTRASETTO THE FIRE pREVENTION NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT FOR FIRE PLAN
REVIEW. If you have any questions regarding your plan review in fire, please contact the Fire
Prevention New Constraction Unit located in the Building and Safety Department at
(909) 477-2730.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIvlONGA '
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Debra Meier, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 13796 - KAUFMAN & BROAD - A request for an extension of a previously
approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 111
condominium units on 7.92 acres of land in the Medium Residential designation (8-
14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the
south side of Mountain View Drive, east of Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-151-32.
BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a letter withdrawing this application. Attached is the
letter of request.
RECOMMENDATION: As the applicant has withdrawn this item, no action is required by the
Planning Commission.
Respectful 'submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DM\gs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant dated October 8, 1999
ITEM B
KAUFMAN/ BROAD ....
RECEIVED
OCT 1 ~. ~
City o! Rancho Cucamon~c
October 8, 1999 ." :,nning Division
Mr. Dan Coleman
Principal Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Call fomia 91730
Dear Mr. Coleman:
Kaufman & Broad of Southern California, Inc. is withdrawing our request that Tentative
Tract 13796 be placed on the Planning Commission's agenda for a one-year extension in
order to retain the possibility ofdevelopment. Please refund any fees that are remaining
at this point in processing.
Should you have any questions, please phone me at (909) 802-1133.
Sincerely,
KAUFMAN & BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.
~ge~
Land Development and Forward Planning
JAC :la
~tlSCEZVED: tO-2B-99; 12:45PII; 714 4426t88 .> R CUCAMONGA COM OEV; #1
!0/26/99 TUE 11:58 VA~ T14 4426188 ~001
October 26, 1~99
City ofRa~cho Cucanonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
R~mcho C~ca~onga, CA 91729
RE: TT15993
Dear Mr.
Wre would Iike to request a continuance for Tentative Tract 15993 and Dovclopm~nt
Rcview 99-45, scheduled to be r~cwccl by the Phnning Con~m;-~sion Wednesday,
Octob~ 27, 1999.
Pent~ing continued evaluation of our product, we would like to poetpone the Planning
Comm;~sion hea_6ng, with a am, date to be dete~ta/n~l.
If you hav~ any quitions or comments, ple. ue contact me at (949) 862-1457.
Sincerely,
Western Pacific Ho Lug
Project Manager
V'T. T ,s
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad BuUer, City Planner
BY: Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO.15993 -
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING - A residential subdivision of 94 single-family lots
on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 d~i~lling units per
acre) of the Victoda Community Plan, located on the northwest comer of Base Line
Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-21 through 24. Related File:
Development Review 99-45. ~
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-45 -
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING - The Design Review of building elevations and
detailed site plan for Tentative Tract Map 15993 consisting of 94 single-family lots
on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Base Line
Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-21 through 24. Related File:
Tentative Tract 15993.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Project Density: 7.6 dwelling units per acre.
B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq:
North - Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way - Low-Medium Residential District (4-8
dwelling units per acre) within the Victoda Community Plan.
South - Base Line Road - Regional Related Office/Commercial, within the Victoria
Community Plan.
East Future Day Creek Boulevard - Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units
per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan.
West Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station # 3 - Low-Medium Residential District (4-8
dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan.
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)within the
Victoria Community Plan
North - Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling un;,"s per acie)'" '
South - Commercial
East Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
West Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
,,
ITEM C & D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
'1'1' 15993 AND DR 99-45
October 27, 1999
Page 2
D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant, except for some scrub vegetation, and has
a natural slope of approximately 2 to 5 percent from the north to south. There is one mature
California Oak Tree of historical significance near the middle of the site. The oak tree is
officially designated as a historical landmark and is required to be preserved. The developer
will be required to prepare an arbodst report to study the immediate area around the tree and
make recommendations to preserve the health of the tree before any authorization for
development on the property.
ANALYSIS:
A. Backqround: The project site was incorporated into the Victoria Community Plan in 1991.
The site is owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency and is under contract to be sold to
the applicant. In 1998, the City Council approved Resolution No. 98-213, changing the
General Plan Land Use Map for the project site from Medium Residential to Low-Medium
Residential. The approved Resolution also included a Master Plan requirement to ensure
coordinated development in the area. The applicant has provided a conceptual Master Plan
as required, which addresses viable circulation and lot patterns for the parcel west of the
project site.
B. General: The site is proposed to be developed under the Innovative Development Standards
of the Victoria Planned Community. The proposal is for the subdivision of 18 acres of land
into 94 single-family lots. The lots will range in size from 5,002 square feet to 9,586 square
feet, with an average size lot of 5,619 square feet. Three two-story house plans are being
proposed, each having three different architectural styles: Spanish. California and Craftsmen
Bungalow. The floor plans are all two-story and range in size from 2,346 to 2.875 square
feet. Lots that side or rear onto Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard are proposed to
have enhanced rear and side elevations to include second-story pop-outs (option for ,5-foot
deck), wood shutters and corbel detail to second-story windows.
C. Innovative Standards: The developer is requesting consideration under the "innovative"
development standards to take advantage of more flexible side yard setbacks. The Victoria
Community Plan defines innovation as:
Innovation in single-family development means to provide creative design
solutions, which address the critical concerns of neighborhood compatibility,
density transition, and design quality. Innovative projects are characterized by an
attractive street scape, which is not monotonous, nor is the street scene
dominated by asphalt/concrete, garages, and cars. Innovative design means
finding creative ways to create well-designed space, particularly usable yard
space.
Western Pacific Housing is using the following strategy to accomplish an innovative design:
· Hobo9 plan I features a covered front porch (6 ~ feet x 28 ~ feet), with a front-on
garage setback at a distance between 60-70 feet from curb face. House plan 2
features a covered porch entryway (6 ~ feet x 5 feet) and proposes a two-car, side-on
garage, with the option for a second one-car garage that is front-on. House plan 3
proposes a two-car, front-on garage setback at a minimum of 18 feet from curb face.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 15993 AND DR 99-45
October 27, 1999
Page 3
· There are nine different elevation styles with three main architectural design concepts:
Spanish, California and Craftsman Bungalow. A vadety of roof, porch, and window
patterns are included on all house plans. There are 9 different exterior color and
matedel schemes.
D. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on
October 5, 1999. The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) recommended approval with
conditions, which have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval. In
addition, the Committee placed a condition that the preservation of the existing oak tree shall
be done through the incorporation of the lettered lot, rather than through the proposed 50-foot
easement. A green-belt trail or paseo connection shall be created to connect Streets "E" and
"C," so that the residents of the subdivision are able to enjoy the oak tree, The green-belt or
paseo connection shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. Also, the historical
significance of the California Oak Tree shall be documented though the incorporation of a
plaque. Action Comments from both meetings are attached (Exhibit "H").
E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Committee reviewed the project on August 11, 1999.
The Committee recommended providing a green-belt paseo in the middle of the project to
contain the histodc oak tree.
F. Gradinq and Technical Review Committees: Both committees reviewed the project and
recommended approval with conditions.
G. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has prepared Part I of the Initial Study. Staff
completed Part II of the Initial Study. The property is located in an area identified as potential
habitat for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) and the California
9natcatcher (Polioptilla californica californica). A habitat assessment was prepared for both
the Califomia Gnatcatcher and San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Bonterra Consulting, May 21
and 25, 1999) by a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The surveys
indicated negative results (no species were observed on the site).
FACTS FOR FINDING: Before approving the application, the Planning Commission shall make
certain findings that the followin9 circumstances do apply:
A The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
B. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the Victoria
Community Plan in which the site is located.
C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development
Code and Victoria Community Plan.
D. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements ~n
the vicinity.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 15993 AND DR 99-45
October 27, 1999
Page 4
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dally
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract
15993 and Development Review 99-45 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of
Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
City Planner
BB:RZ~ma
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Master Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" - Elevations
Exhibit "G" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "H" - Trail Advisory Committee Comments, dated August 11, 1999
Exhibit "1" - Development Review Committee Comments, dated October 5, 1999
-Exhibit "J" - Initial Study Part II
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract
Resolution of Approval for Design Review
I
TT 15993 & DI 99-45
Western Pacific Homes
APN: 207-091-21 through 24.
Location Map
Project Site
N
MASTER PLAN SITE STUDY
DAY CREEK CHANNEL
ProjeCt SHe TT 16993
I
I
I
I
DAY CREEK BLVDo
NORTH>' E;3 pHB &ASSOCIATES, INCo
(626) 914-6256 FAX: (626) 914-5756
1820 SOUTH GRAI~D AVE~UF_, G~,~NDO~A, CAINIA 9~740
~' ' LOT AREA TABULATION
.I-
_'ILl ',;',', "' ........... ' .....
~ ;:;: "' ..........
| r;;~ "' ~ ,.-. ,.:, ..-
-'~ : ""
~J/ LU ;; ....%, ,' ..............
"Z ;: "" "" ' .............. '
II
Plan I Front Elevations
WesternPacific. V I C T O R I A ~.~-~, K'rc~YG,c:x.p ....
Housing R a n c h o C u
~ 2
I
0
~. .' . . '! ~ ·
.d";~tt',~,~'_,~"~'~.,~'d~, Enhanced Rear
Plan i Exterior Elevations
V I C T 0 R I A ~X~ ~,v~ .....
s Rancho Cucnmonga , California
3
El
Plan 2 Front Elevations
Paciric. V I C T O R I A - K~-GvoRc~ .....
[] 0
~ .
Left
Enhanced Side
Plan 2 Exterior ~levations 0--~ 0
~ w~,,~rn V I C T O R I A ~.~.~ .....
s g Rancho Cueamonga . California ~ ....... '~'~
6
Plan 3 Front Elevations
0 4
Pacific
Housing R a n c h o C u c a m o n g a , C ali f or n I a ~-~
~TN,',~,~;':.~T',,~'~,, Enhanced Rear
Plan 3 Exterior Elevations ~ t~
Western V I C T O R I A ~% KTGYGR~ ....
pacific.
Housing Kancho Cucamonga , California
g .... I 42'-0'
I 5' OpL Deck I '
nedroom
rain;
Bedroom 2
5'.0"
Beth 2. Kitchen
,,
Den I I Bedroom 4 t Living
_ p Den I ' I
V-_:I, . t~ '1 Second Floor [ t P ] 8 n ] F ] o o r P ] 8
0 4 p ~ Floor Plan
~ ~-- D 4 9edroom I Opt Den
Pacific KTGY GROUP. ....
Housing R n n c h o C u c n m o n g a , C n I i ~ o r n i n ~ ~ZZC~;'~:~'~'::~:~;:~
II
42'-0' . ·
I 5' Opt. Deck I .c~
'~ BeM~r~m ~M Family Dining Living
Bedroom 4 Bedroom 3 F=~ Oatage 2 rain.
Hall
....... 1 ~'~"~.~.-~ Second Floor First Floor Opt l~edroom
Bedroom 2
Loft
Opt Loft
Floor Plan
[3 --m~mummsm~" [3 3 Bath
Pacific
Housing'
I ........ s 0
I ~' Opt. D~ck I
Bedroom I I Family
Tandem Dining to I0'
Garage
Opt Retreat ~eel0w
Bedroom 2
Opt Loft :: ~ _. Living
Bedroom 3
(,~],~_~ / Bedroom 5
Opt Loft I. ~ I .......... ? : ............
Second FIoo First Floor
Floor Plan
Plan 3 Floor Plan
W.tefn V I C T O R I A
Pacific
Housing R a n c h o C u c a m o n g a . C a I i f o r n i a -, .~.~r~ t=...~ ....._..,__.:.::..__]
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
TRAILS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE AGENDA
WEDNESDAY AUGUST 11, 1999, @ 6:00 PM
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
ACTION AGENDA
I. ROLLCALL:
Ciopton X Rabone A
Coleman X Stewart X
Dickey X Tolstoy X
Mannedno (Alternate) Whitehead (Alternate)
II. .NEW BUSINES_.__.~S:
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15993 -
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING -A residential subdivision of 94 single
family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-
8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoda Community Plan, located on the
northwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN:
227-091-18 through 21. Related Files: General Plan Amendment 98-04°
and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-04 approved by the City
· Council in November 1998.
III. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
None
IV ANNOUNCEMENTS
Rails to Trails meeting tomorrow with SANBAG and other cities.
V. ADJOURNMENT
i
TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
COMMENT SHEET
AUGUST 11, 1999
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. ENVIRONMENTAl ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15993 - WESTERN
PACIFIC HOUSING - A residential subdivision of 94 single family lots on 18 acros of land
in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoda
Community Plan, located on the northwest comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek
Boulevard - APN: 227-091-18 through 21. Related Files: General Plan Amendment 98-
04, and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 98-04 approved by the City Council in
November 1998.
Background: This site was not originally part of the Victoria Planned Community; however, was
incorporated into Victoria Community Plan in 1991. The site is owned by the City's Redevelopment
Agency and is under contract to be sold to the applicant.
Context: The project site is bordered by the old railroad right-of-away to the north, Fire Station No.
3 and San Bemardino County owned land to the west, future Day Creek Boulevard to the east, and
Base Line Road to the south. Since 1981, the City's General Plan has identified the railroad right-
of-away as a future multi-purpose Community Trail. The Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-away
has been decommissioned for several years and the majority of the track have been removed. The
Railroad right-a-way will someday be an integral part of the interconnection of the City's trail system.
In addition, the Victoria Community Plan, identifies the railroad right-of-away as a vital connection
to the interconnection of residential areas to one another, and to the communities open space
system as well as a connection to the regional open space and trail system. The stated goal of the
Victoria Community Plan is to create a system of trails that weaves throughout the community
connecting residential areas to one another, and to open space (i.e, parks). As a result, projects
in Victoria that border the railroad right-of-way, have provided greenbelt trail connections to the
railroad right-of-way. A Community Trail is planned along the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and
is currently under construction.
Analysis: The project proposes no greenbelt trails, nor any trail connection to the railroad right-
away, north of the project site. An interior trail connection, if provided, should be located at the
northwest corner of the tract (see Exhibit "A"). The applicant feels that the sidewalk being proposed
along the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, will adequately serve as a trail linkage to the railroad
right-of-way. The proposed lot layout of site and the narrow width along the north property
boundary of the site, Day Croek Boulevard would conveniently serve as a paseo linkage for the
residents of the tract. An interior trail connection would provide ~_ shorter route to
approximately 40 ~ots; however, staff beEeves tha'; the benefit of a shorter walking distance
is minimal. Staff agrees with applicant, and fee!s that a trail connection ~long the north
property boundary is not necessary. Should the adjoining property to ~he west ever be :
subdivided, staff would recommend a trail connection due to the significantly greater
distance from Day Creek Boulevard.
TRAILS COMMI'FI'EE AGENDA
TT 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSII~G
August 11. 1999 :
Page 2
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval ofthe project as proposed.
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tract Map
Staff Planner: Rudy Zeledon
ACTION: Recommended a green belt trail to connect "C" and "E" Streets and to
incorporate the Oak tree. Use decomposed granite surface and minimal landscaping.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:30 p.m. Rudy Zeledon October 5, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO.15993 -WESTERN PACIFIC
HOUSING - A residential subdivision of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medi-.~
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoda Community Plan, located on the
northwest comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-18 through 21.
Related Files: General Plan Amendment 98-04, and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-04
approved by the City Council in November 1998.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC
HOUSING - The Design Review of building elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract
15993 consisting of 94 single family lots on 18 acres offand in the Low-Medium Residential District
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest comer of Base
Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-18 through 21. Related Files: Tentative Tract
15993, General Plan Amendment 98-04, and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-04 approved
by the City Council in November 1998.
Desiqn Parameters: The site is owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency and Is under contract
to be sold to the applicant. It is vacant except for some scrub vegetation, has a natural slope of
approximately 2 to 5 percent from north to south, and contains one mature California Oak bee in
the middle of the site. The Developer will be required to submit an arbodst report with
recommendations to ensure the health and the preservation the tree before any development on the
property.
The developer proposed to develop the site under the innovative Development Standards allowed
in the Victoria Community Plan. The lots range in size from 5,002 to 9,586 square feet with an
average lot size of 5,619 square feet. Three two-story house plans are being proposed, each having
three different elevation styles. Plans 1 and 3 have front-on garages while Plan 2 has side-on
garages with the option for a second front-on garage. Lots that side or rear on to Base Line Road
and Day Creek Boulevard are proposed to have enhanced rear and side elevations to include
second-story pop-outs (option for 5-foot deck), wood shutters, and corbel detail to second story
windows.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion:
Maior Issues: The following broad issues will be on the focus of committee discussion regarding this
project:
1. The Trails Advisory Committee, at its meeting of August 11, 1999, recommended that the
Design Review Committee consider a lettered lot for the preservation of the existing Oak tree
rather than a proposed 50-foot easement on Lot 33. The applicant proposed the 50-fcot
easement because Engineering staff recommended it. According to Engineering staff, the
reason for the proposed easement versus a lettered lot is that at some future time when the
Oak tree ever becomes deceased or dying, the City would be abl~- to vacate and remove the
easemeaL H~wever, the Trail Advisory Committee fe,t ti ;~t creating a iettered Lot wt~uld allow
· - a green-belt trail connection ;o Streets "E"and "C."= i'he applicant' supports both tree
preservation proposals; therefore, the Design Review Committee should provide direction .to
staff.
DRC COMMENTS
'Fi' 15993 & DR 99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 5, 1999
Page 2 :
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Continue wainscot siding treatment, on all proposed house plan elevations, around to side
elevations up to interior return walls.
2. Provide corbel detail to both second floor windows, on house Plans I and 2.
3. All proposed stucco trim surround on windows, shall be of high density form.
4. Provide additional detail to the eaves, on all house plans, to include double wood fascia trim.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee approve the project.
Deslqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pare Stewart, N.ancy Fong
Staff Planner:. Rudy Zeledon
The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions:
1. Preservation of the existing Oak tree through the incorporation of lettered lot, rather than
through the proposed 50 foot easemenL A green-belt trail or paseo connection shall be
created to connect Streets "E" and "C," so that the residence of the subdivision would be able
to enjoy the Oak tree. The green-belt or paseo connection shall be subject to City Planner
approval.
2. Continue wainscot siding treatment, on Plans 1C and 2C, around to side elevations up to
intedor return walls or logical ending.
3. Provide corbel detail to both second floor windows, on rear enhanced elevations on Plans
I and 2.
4. .All proposed stucco trim surround on windows, shall be of high density foam.
5. Provide additional detail to the eaves, on Plans 1A and 1B, to include double wood fascia trim
(in areas where gutters are not proposed).
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Tentative Tract 15993 and DR 99-45
2. Related Files: General Plan Amendment 98-04;
Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-04
3. Description of Project:
TENTATIVE TRACT 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING - A residential subdivision
of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) District of the Victoria:Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of
Base line Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-21 through 24.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING- The Design Review of
building elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract map 15993 consisting of 94
single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) District of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Base line
Road and Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-21 through 24.
4.' Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Western Pacific Housing
16940 Von Karmen Avenue, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92606
5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) District
of the -Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Base line Road and
Day Creek Boulevard
6. Zoning: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) District of the Victoria
Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Base line Road and Day Creek
Boulevard
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
North: Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-way
South: Base Line Road
East: Future Day Creek Boulevard
West: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Station # 3.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner
(909) 477-2750
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 PacJe 2
10. Other agencies whose approval is required:
None.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning (X) Transportation/Circulation (X) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (X) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (X) Aesthetics
(X) Water ( ) Hazards (X) Cultural Resources
(X) Air Quality (X) Noise (X) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier E-IR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that arf; imposed-upon [he proposed~project.
· udy~c~edon
~fscsistant Planner
September 27, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~le 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
zoning? . = ....
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
, d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The tentative tract map application follows a General Plan Amendment and Victoria
Community Plan Amendment recently adopted for this land area (December 1998)
which changed the land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling
_units per acre) to Low-Medium (4- 8 dwelling units per acre).
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordaDle
housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Page 4
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) (X)
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Changes in currents, or the coume or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
~rough direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or .I .;. ~ :~. ,.
excavations, or through substantial loss of , -
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) iX) .
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Ex/ ;'-5'- z/·
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Page 5
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The development of the proposed project will increase the amount of paved surface
areas which could result in a decrease in absorption rates and an increase in the
amount of surface water runoff. All runoff will be conveyed to existing and proposed
drainage facilities designed to handle the subject water flows.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.'
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments: -
a & b) Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and
equipment exhaust as it is used on-site. Major sources of emissions during this
phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and
fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling
over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading filling. NOx and
PM10 levels will be exceeded on a daily basis dudng construction. The following
mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to a less-than
significant level:
1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency.
:i'he construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
~"' Pjans include a statement that all construction equipment ~vill be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~le 6
not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall
length of the construction period should be extended, thereby
decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles
and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The construction contractor shall support and encourage ride sharin9
and transit incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on-site
and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed
below:
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or
transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler
systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to
create a crust after each day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be
used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to
prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would
include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after
work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15
miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed,
the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by
pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so
that dust generation will not occur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept
moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials, and/or
construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the
point of origin.
6) The construction contractor shall utilize as much as possible pre-coated
natural colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and
coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such
as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings
application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag,
or sponge.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~le 7
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Hazards or barders for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies suppoding
alternative transportation (e.g., bus rumouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The project will generate new trips because of the new construction. The number
of trips is not considered significant, therefore the project does not warrant a Traffic
Study Analysis. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and Victoria
Planned Community for which the street widths were evaluated at a build-out
condition. The project will be required to install street frontage improvements in
their ultimate configuration, per ordinance, and to pay associated Transportation
Development Fees. The project will include the construction of Base Line Road (full
width) from the Day Creek Channel to the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. The
project will also include the modification of the Day Creek Boulevard frontage, in
-accordance with City standards for a "Major Divided Arterial" as required.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants,
fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Locally designatac: ~pecies (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus v~ndrow,.:et~;.)? ( ) ( ) '(X) ( )
c) Locally desiS'mated '~ural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) .
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
~ Tentative Tract 15993 Page 8
Comments:
a) The site is near sensitive Riversidian Aluvial Fan Sage Scrub and Costal Sage
Scrub Habitats. The property is located in an area identified by the Service as
potential habitat for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys Merriami
Parvus) and the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila California Californica). A habitat
assessment was prepared for both the California Gnatcatcher and the San
Bemardino Kangaroo Rat (Bonterra Consulting, May 21 and 25, 1999) by a biologist
permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The surveys indicated negative
results (no species were observed on the site).
b) There is one mature California Oak of historical significance near the middle of the
site. The oak is officially designated as a histodcel landmark. The California Oak
will be preserved. The Developer will be required to do an arborist report to study
the immediate area around the tree and make recommendations to preserve the
health of the tree. As mitigation, the Oak tree shall be preserved.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
-mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ) (X)
b) Possible interference with an emergency
.... response plan or emergency evacuation iGlan? ( ) ( ) . ) (X)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ) (X) .
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with ~ammable
brush. grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 PacJe 9
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a) The project involves the construction of 94 single family homes. Construction
activity is likely to result in an increase in noise levels from associated grading and
development activity. Construction hours will be limited as required by the
Development Code, to lesson any construction related disturbance in noise levels
to the surrounding properties. The resulting residential project is not likely to
produce a significant increase in existing noise levels.
b) The General Plan indicates future noise levels exceeding 65 Ldn on Base Line
Road and exceeding 70 Ldn along Day Creek Boulevard, which requires detailed
analysis of noise attenuation measures. Significant noise impact on the residents
will likely result if sound attenuation devices (interior and exterior) are not
incorporated into the project design to screen noise impacts created by traffic on
Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. An acoustical analysis was prepared
by RKJK and Associates Inc., on September 23, 1999, to determine what mitigated
measures would be necessary to reduce noise levels to a permissible level. The
noise study recommended that, in order to mitigate noise to "safe" levels, a
minimum 3-7 foot high wall be constructed along both Base Line Road and
Day Creek Boulevard (Lots 68-94), along the top of the proposed street scape
berms and/or slopes. In addition, lots 68-94 will require a mechanical
'ventilation system to permit a "window closed" condition. Attic vents facing
Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard should be provided with an
acoustical baffle to prevent vehicle noise intrusion through the attic vents.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Police prot~ctior.'~ ...... ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~le 10
Comments:
a & c) The development of 94 single-family homes will increase the demand on public
services. Tract Map Conditions of Approval will require the developer to participate
in the funding of special districts for the necessary construction and maintenance
of fire protection and school facilities. Therefore, the impact is not considered
significant.
impact Less
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Issue~ and ~jpf~fllng Informalloll Sources: ~gff~nt I No
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
14. CUrZ~:rUp, ALRESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ) ( ) ) (X) -
b) Disturb arohaeofogical resources? ) ( ) ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ) (X) ) ( )
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~e 11
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
b) Refer to item 7b).
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The development of 94 homes will increase the demand on parks. The developer
will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of building permit issuance
tO offset any impact on parks. The impact is not considered significant.
16, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce thr; r;:~mber 3r restr;ct ~he
r,~nge of a rare or endangered r, !a,~.t or, animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) (') (X) -
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~le 12
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively bdef, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) · (), ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other currant projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiedng, preg ram E IR, or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The
following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all
that apply):
(X) General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(X) Victoria Planned Community EIR
(Certified May 20, 1981)
(X) General Plan Amendments 98-04 and Victoria Community Plan
Arnendments 9~'-03..
' ~ (SCH #97071043, carti~d April 15, 1998)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15993 Pa~le 13
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures, Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or heraby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would
occur.
Signature: Date:
Print Name and Title:
-dz/,,7~, :z-- -'-J':,'.z"C4--D
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 2f09f and 2f092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15993 and Development Review 99-45
Public Review Period Closes: October 27, 1999
Project Name: project Applicant: Western Pacific Housing
Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the northwest comer of Base Line Road and
Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-091-18 through 21.
Project Description: A residentia subdivision of 94 sing e family ots on 18 acres of land and the
design review of building elevations and detailed site plan thereof in the Low-Medium Res dential D stdct
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoda Community Plan.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted
an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
Significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2841.
NOT,:CE
The public is i~tvited to comment on,the pro[~osed',Negative Declaration during the review period.
October 27, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 15993, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 94 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
ON 18 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM DISTRICT (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD
AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 227-091-21 THROUGH 24.
A. Recitals.
1. Western Pacific Housing has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract
Map 15993, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of fie City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on October 27, 1999, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. - The application applies to the property located at the northwest comer of Base
Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, with a street frontage of 685 feet on Base Line Road and
1,139 feet on Day Creek Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is the Southern Pacific Railroad right-
of-way, the property to the south is Base Line Road, the property to the west is the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District land, and the property to the east is the future Day Creek
Boulevard.
c. The application contemplates a residential subdivision of 94 single-family
residential lots on 18 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District of the Victoria
Community Plan; and
d. The project will comply with all applicable innovative provisions of the Low-
Medium Residential District of the Victoria Commupity-Plan, including minimum lot size, minimum
lot average, lot width, lot depth, height limitations, setbacks, and pdvate opensspace. The project
will subdivide 18 acres of land into 94 sir~le-family Iots~ averaging 5,619 square feet per lot, which
exceeds the minimum lot average of 4,000 square feet. The project complies with minimum lot
depth of 90 feet and minimum lot width of 50 feet.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
'IF 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 2
a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and
any applicable specific plans; and
b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto. and incorporated herein by this reference.
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole.
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits. and the information provided to the
Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set tEorth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above.
.this Commission hereby approves the application subject To ~ech and even; condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannin.q Division
1) The existing California Oak Tree on the project site is required to be preserved in
place. The applicant shall do an arbodst report to study the immediate area around the
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
"1'I' 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 3
tree and make recommendations to preserve the health of the tree before any
authorization for development of the property.
2) The preservation of the existing the California Oak Tree shall be done through the
incorporation of the lettered lot. A green-belt or paseo connection through the lettered
lot shall be created to connect "E" and "C" subject to City Planner and City Engineer
review and approval. in addition, the proposed fencing for residence surrounding the
letter lot shall be reviewed.
3) The historical significance of the California Oak Tree shall be documented through the
incorporation of a plaque. The placement and design of the plaque will be subject to
City Planner review and approval.
4) Tract boundary walls along Base Line Road shall be the Victoda Theme Wall with
decorative columns and caps. The tract boundary wall along Day Creek Boulevard
shall be designed in compliance with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation
Corridor Master Plan. The developer shall be required to construct tract boundary
walls and install landscaping prior to occupancy of any lot adjacent to the wall.
5) The major residential entry at the comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard,
and the streetscape along Day Creek Boulevard, shall be designed in conformance
with the Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Corridor Master Plan and subject to
City Planner review and approval.
6) The applicant shall make a good faith effort with the adjacent property owner
(SANBAG), north of the project site, to address the drainage issues (sump removal)
along the north boundary of the project site.
~ivision
1) Construct Base Line Road full width from Day Creek Channel to the east side of Day
Creek Boulevard, including but not limited to, curb and gutters, sidewalks, street lights,
signing, striping, median island with dual eastbound left turn lanes at Day Creek
Boulevard. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the
cost of constructing the improvements south of the centedine of Base Line Road and
east and west of the project boundaries. If Base Line Road is improved by others, the
developers shall be reimbursed for their respective frontage improvements.
2) Provide a westbound bus bay at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and
Base Line Road and a dght turn lane at "A" Street for "Not A Part" to the west of this
project.
3) Modify Day Creek Boulevard frontage, in accordance with City standards for "Major
Divided Arterial" as required, including full street improvements, curb and gutters,
sidewalks, street lights, median island, traffic stdping and signing, and a right turn lane
at "H" Street. Median opening will be allowed at "H" Street (former Fire Department
driveway) with a northbound left-turn lane in the median.
4) Fully construct interna:-street, in accordanc~ wit~ Cib.' standards as required, such as
curb and gutters, sidewalks, ddveway approaches ~treet lights, signing ~nd stripin.g,
etc.
5) Modify traffic signals at Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, as required.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 4
6) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side
of Base Line Road shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of the east
project boundary to the first pole off-site west of the west project boundary, pdor to
public improvements or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request
a reimbursement agreement to recover one half of the City adopted cost for
undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the
street.
7) Construct the Master Plan storm drain line in Base Line Road and Day Creek
Boulevard including necessary catch basin to connect to Day Creek Channel to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The area bounded on the north and south by
Highland Avenue and Base Line Road, and east and west by the Edison Corridor and
Victoda Windrows tract will be considered as drainage boundary for this area. The
cost of drainage systems shall be borne by all properties lying within the drainage
boundary in proportion to drainage areas. Right-of-way, government properties, and
utility corridors are exempt from the calculation.
8) Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the previously
mentioned master planned storm drains. The cost of local storm drains shall be borne
by this development.
9) If the City project of Day Creek Boulevard is completed, this development will be
required to complete the rest of the improvements. This development shall not receive
transportation fee credit for backbone system, however, is eligible for a reimbursement
agreement to recover one half of the cost of the street improvements (including street
lights but not including padeway improvements) from the developer on the east side of
Day Creek Boulevard. However, if improvements are completed by others, this
developer shall reimburse those who completed the improvements.
10) The first development along Day Creek Boulevard will be required to prepare a
Beautification Master Plan for the parkways and median. The City will attempt to
proportion the cost of the Master Plan to those developments required to install the
landscaping or fronting the landscaped areas.
11) City maintained landscape area shall be the frontage of Base Line Road and Day
Creek Boulevard only.
12) Preservation of the oak tree shall be as directed by the City Planner and the City
Engineer. The lot shall be a letter lot deeded to the City in fee simple with no
restriction. The access from the letter lot to the street shall be a paseo type street.
The design of the lettered lot shall be subject to City Planner & City Engineer review.
An arborist shall be hired by the developer to recommend measures for proper
preservation of the oak tree during construction and the ultimate design of the lettered
lot. The arborist shall be on contract with the developer for the duration of the
development. Priiorto Cityacceptance ofpublicimprovements, the arboristshall make
a final report of the status of the tree. The report is subject to review by City Staff. Any
r~c~mmendations or mitigation measures, should the tree be damaged or dying, will
be~the responsibility of the developer.
13) ,cJt?eet "A" shall be 60 feet wide. If communication with Flood Control for joint access/
or right-of-way is not successful, Street "A" shall be moved eastedy within the tract
boundary.
14) "F" Street shall not terminate with a reduced radius cul-de-sac; it shall terminate as a
stub street with the curbs and gutters being straight and 36 feet between curbs.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 5
15) The storm drain easement across Lot 85 shall be 12 feet wide.
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
Air Quality
A r quality mpacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and equipment
exhaust as it is used on-site. Major sources of emissions during th s phase include exhaust
emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated as a result
of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil
disturbances by grade/fill. NOx and PM~0 levels will be exceeded on a daily basis dudng
construction. The following mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to a less-
than significant level:
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site
based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The Construction
Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all
construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electdc or diesel-powered equipment in lieu
of gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
3) The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a
statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog
season (May through October), the overall length of the construction pedod should be
extended; thereby, decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage dale-sharing and transit
incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to a
minimum by following the dust control measures listed below:
a) During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill
materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from
leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease.
b) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all
areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site.
At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning
and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles
per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the entire area
of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the erea
is paved or othen~se developed so that dust generation will not oCcur.
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated
with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to
or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15993 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 6
6) The Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated natural
colored building materials. water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and coating transfer or
spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high-volume low-pressure
(HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller.
trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
Noise
1) To mitigate traffic noise to 'safe" levels, a minimum 3-7 foot high wall be constructed
along both Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard (Lots 68-94) along the top of the
proposed street scape berms and/or slopes. In addition Lots 68-94 will require a
mechanical ventilation system to permit a '~vindow closed" condition. Attic vents facing
Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard should be provide with an acoustical baffle
to prevent vehicle noise intrusion through the attic vents.
Tree Preservation
1) The existing Califomia Oak Tree on the project site shall be preserved in place. The
applicant shall prepare an arbodst report to study the immediate area around the tree
and make recommendations to preserve the health of the tree before any authorization
for development of the property. The tree shall be protected dudng grading and
construction as required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
19.08.110.
The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNeil, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
kOES: COMMISSIONEPS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15993 and Development Review 99-45
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project.
This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation
measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact'mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper acfion is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file, with the department having the original authority ,
. .. ,, for processing the project. Reports will be avail'able from the City upon request ~t the fo owing
· :. address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TT 15993 AND DR 99-45
September 27, 1999
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed
off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the
MMP Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may adse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the
monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The
monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the
Community Development Director pdor to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: TT'15993 and DR 99-45 Applicant: Western Pacific
Initial Study Prepared by: Rudy Zeledon Date: September 27, 1999
· The use of low-emissions and high-energy CP/BO B/C As Necessary A 4
efficiency construction equipment.
· Utilization of electric or diesel-powered equipment CP/BO B/C As Necessary A 4
where feasible.
Grading Plans state equipment shut off when not in CP/BO C Plan Check C 2
use. Extend construction period dudng smog
season (May-October)
Encourage ride-sharing and transit incentives for CP B/C As Necessary A/D 4
construction crew.
Dust generated by the development shall be CP/BO C As Necessary A 2/4
retained on-site.
Utilize, as much as possible, pracoated natural CP/BO B/C As Necessary NC
colored building materials (water-based or
Iow-VOC coating) and manual coating or spray
equipment with high efficiency transfer.
· A minimum of 3-7 foot high be constructed along CP/BO B\C Prior to the C/A 2
Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard (Lots issuance of
68-94) Building Permits 2
· Mechanical ventilation system to permit a '~,indow CP/BO B C
closed" condition,
· Attic vents facing Base Line Road and Day Creek CP/BO B C 2
Boulevard will raquira an acoustical baffle.
· Preserve oak tree, CP B/C Prior to the A, B, D 1/2
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 Page 2
,, Key to Checklist Abbreviations
CDD - Communi~ Development Dim~or A - ~th Each New Development A - On-site Ins~ion I - W~hhold Re~rdation of Final Map
CP - C~ Planner or designee B - Pdor To Constm~ion B - ~her Agen~ Pe~ff I ~proval 2 - W~hhold Grading or Building Petit
CE - Ci~ Engineer or designee C - ~roughout Constm~ion C - Plan Che~ 3 - ~hhold Ceffifi~te of O~pan~
BO - Building ~cial or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Subm~al (Repo~s I Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Woffi O~er
PO - Poli~ Captain or designee E - O~mting 5 - Retain Depos~ or Bonds
FC - Fire Chief or desi~.~e~ 6 - Revoke CUP
P
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 15993 and Development Review 99-45
SUBJECT: 94 Lot Subdivision
APPLICANT: Western Pacific
LOCATION: Northeast comer Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE pLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WffH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
;ompbtlon Date
General Requirements
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents. officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Ranner's letter of approval, and all Standard
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, uniess extended by the Planning Commission, if building __/__
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
2. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if __/__
building permits are not ;~sued pr approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the
date of approval. No exten~i~ are allowed.
Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which __/ /
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan.
1
Project NO, TT 15993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / /
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
7, A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and / /
approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of
building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of
shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with / /
all receptacles shielded from public view.
9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
10. All ground-_mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc.. shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
For single family residential developments. transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner.
including proper illumination.
13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A reccrded copy shall be provided to the
City Engir'.eer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit fa the Planning Division a list of th,~ '
name andi address of their officers b - or before January 1 of each: and every year and whenever
said information changes.
14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
,sc.a,25/99 2
project No. Tr 15993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
15. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall __/__ __
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any exi,sting walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
16. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two '/z-inch lag bolts, to withstand high
winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall
extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
17. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain. paint, or water sealant.
18. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk.
19. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry.
20. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone venee~'s may be __ __/__
manufactured products.
D. Building Design
1. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment. __ __/__
detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or __/ /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Multiple ca;garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. / /__
F. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping __/__ __
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier __1__
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting;-and trimming methods.
3. ~ All private slopes of 5 ,%*et or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigatcd and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater __ I__
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
3
Project No. TT 15993 & DR 9945
CompletJon Date
follows: one 15*gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-
.gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted
~n staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section
shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
5. Forsingle family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously __ __
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sol{
and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, wails, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included /
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineerin9 Division.
7. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rook, specimen size trees, meandering /
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line
Road. Day Creek Boulevard.
8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the /
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, /
the design shaft be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
G. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conform.ance with the mitigation measures contained in the final repod.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and repoding. Applicant shall be required
to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guarenteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and repod on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the appreved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final cedificate of occupancy),
the applicant shall provide a wdften monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior
to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual
qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
H. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. Multi*family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
,sc-8r25,99 4
project NO. Tr 15993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
SAFETY,g0 )FOR
I. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: / /
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch. number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules. and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and
waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and
air conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., T'l' #. CUP #. DR #, etc.) cleady identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations. energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /__
Architect's/Engineers stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. --/--
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
J, Site Developmen_t
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be __/__ __
marked with the project file number (i .e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and
Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to __/__/__
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pa~/development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,
Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant
shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit
issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by ,he Bui!ding.Official, after trg~:t/parcal.'map recordation __/__/__
and;prior to issuance of building p~rmits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday '1__1__
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5
ProjedNo. TT15993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
K. New Structures
1. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." /
L. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __ __/__
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for __/
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a
California Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, {909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: - -
M. Dedication and Vehicular Access
!. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets,
community trails. public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal
encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or
tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails,
etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centedine):
Varies from 60 to 70 total feet on Base Line Road
72 total feet on Day Creek Boulevard
3. All existing ~asements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on
the final map.
4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall
be dedicated to the City.
5. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such
time as the City acquires the property interests required forthe improvements. Such agreement
shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivisaon. Security for a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained
by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior
to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: Base
Line Road. ,,~
SC -eJ25/99 6
ptojectNo. 1-r 15993&DR99-45
Completion Date
Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, I__1__
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City
Standards. interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,
AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: __ I__1__
Curb & A.C, Side* Ddve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
Base Line Road
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pa~'ement
reconstruction and ovedays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item.
"3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety / I__
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /__
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and /
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or
reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with p~dl rope or as specified. .-. ~-.: ,.,:~ ._
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersectio,s per City / /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f, Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __1__1__
adequate detours during construction, Street or lane closure permits are required. A
7
Project No. TT 15993 & DR ~945
Completion Date
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __
4. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review I
and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets
fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in
addition to any other permits required.
5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with I
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industdal driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
O. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall /
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape
Maintenance District: Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard.
2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be home by the developer.
3. All required. public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective __
Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard.
P. Drainage and Flood Control
1.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
2. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage __1__1 __
in a sump catch basin on the public street.
Q. Utilities
1. :~rovide separa~Utili',y services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system. water, gas, / /
electric power, '(e~ephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance wh'h the Utility
Standards. '_-asements shall be provided as required.
Project NO, TT 15993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
2, The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary, / /
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance
from the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs
first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map
approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects.
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, cavering the estimated operating costs for __ / /
all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pdor to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTIONIN EW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 1,500 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b)
(Increase).
X__A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel prior to water plan approval.
X For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants
shall be conducted by the buildeddeveloper and witnessed by fire department personnel
after construction and prior to occupancy,
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed,
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, e~c.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
3, Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants,
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet, Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meetthis standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to
final inspection.
C. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protec;ic~ Disu'ict Ordinance 3?.. * · __ l~
7. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho / /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District as follows:
X $132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
ProjedNo. TT15993 & OR 99-45
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
T. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. /
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are /
within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be
used.
3. All garage or rolling doora shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. /__
U. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be /
lifted from frame or track in any manner.
V, Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime /
visibility.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 99-45 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15993, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM
DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-21 THROUGH 24.
A. Recitals.
1. Westem Pacific Housing has filed an application for the Development Review of Tract
15993, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found. determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the
above-referenced meeting on October 27, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code; and
d. The project will comply with all applicable innovative provisions of the Low-
Medium Residential Distdct of the Victoria Community Plan, including minimum lot size, minimum
lot average, lot width and lot depth, height limitations, setbacks, and private open space. The
project will subdivide 18 acres of land into 94 single-family lots, averaging 5,619 square feet per
lot, which exceeds the minimum lot average of 4,000 square feet. The project complies with
'.- minimum lot depth of 90 feet and minimum lot width of 50 feet. The project co -.--lplies with the 50-
foot building setback from Base Line Road, including a 25-foot parkway ~nd 44-foot building
setback from Day Creek Boulevard, including a 19-foot parkway. The dwelling units will not
exceed 35 feet in height and meet the side yard setback of 5 feet minimum one side; 10 feet
combined both sides; rear yard setback of 15 feet, 25 feet if lot rears onto an arterial mad; and
front yard setback of 10 feet for side entry garage and 18 feet setback for front entry garage. The
project complies with the 750 square-foot private open space requirement; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 2
e. The proposed design, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
f. The development of the proposed project would not have a significant impact on
the environment.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated here n by this reference
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as conditions of approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Stud_y, and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat
upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5 (c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia
Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planninq Division
1) All conditions.of approval for Tentative '~'ract 15993 shall apply.
2) All retaining walls exposeo to public view ~hall all be treated with a
decorative extedor finish or be composed Of a decorative block material.
3) Garden and retaining walls extending into front setbacks shall have a
decorative cap and an end pilaster or "square block" to provide definition.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 3
4) Continue wainscot siding treatment on house plans 1C & 2C, around to
side elevations up to intedor return walls or logical ending.
5) Provide corbel detail to both second floor windows, on rear enhanced
elevations on house plans 1 & 2.
6) All intedor retaining walls shall not exceed 3 feet in height.
7)Provide a minimum 5-foot setback between fencing on all comer side yards
and sidewalks. .;
8) All proposed stucco trim surround on windows shall be of high density
foam.
9) On house plans 1A and 1 B, provide additional detail to the eaves to include
double wood fascia trim (in areas where gutters are not proposed),
10) Dwelling unit on Lot 77 shall have a rear yard set back of 25 feet from the
property line.
En~ineednq Division
1) All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 15993 shall apply,
Environmental Mitiqation Measures
AIr Quality
Air quality impacts may occur dudng the site preparation including grading and equipment
exhaustas it is used on-site. Major sources of emissions dudng this phase include exhaust
emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dustgenerated as a result
of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil
disturbances by grade/fill. NOx and PM~o levels will be exceeded on a daily basis dudng
construction. The following mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to a less-
than significant level:
1) The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site
based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The Construction
Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all
construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications.
2) The Construction Contractor shall utilize electdc or diesel-powered equipment in lieu -~ .?.f.,%gasoline-powered engines where feasible.
The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a
statement fiat work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During sm~g
season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be
extended; thereby, decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize
vehicles and equipment operating at the same time.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999
Page 4
4) The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ride-sharing and transit
incentives for the construction crew.
5) Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to a
minimum by following the dust control measures listed below:
a) Dudng clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut
or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent
dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities
cease.
b) Dudng construction, watertrucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep
all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving
the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the
later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind
exceeds 15 miles per hour.
c) After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed; the entire
area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until
the area is paved or othenNise developed so that dust generation will not
OCCUr,
d) Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or
treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation.
e) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debds
to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin.
6) Th_e Construction Contractor shall utilize, as much as possible, pre-coated natural
colored building materials, water-based or Iow-VOC coating, and coating transfer or
spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high-volume low-pressure
(HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller,
trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge.
Noise
1) To mitigate traffic noise to "safe" levels, a minimum 3-7 foot high wall be constructed
along both Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard (Lots 68-94) along the top of the
proposed street scape berms and/or slopes. In addition Lots 68-94 will require a
mechanical ventilation system to permit a '%vindow closed" condition. Attic vents facing
Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard should be provide with an acoustical baffle
to prevent vehicle noise intrusion thrn~jgh the attic vents
Tree Pre~ervation
1) The existing Califomia Oak Tree on the project site shall be preserved in place. The
applicant shall prepare an arbodst report to study the immediate area around the tree
and make recommendations to preserve the health of the tree before any authorization
for development of the property. The tree shall be protected dudng grading and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,
DP, 99-45 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
October 27, 1999 '.
Page 5
construction as required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
19.08.110.
The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999 by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: C_OMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15993 and Development Review 99-45
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project.
This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation
measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper ac{ion is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covedng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file, with the department having the original authority
for process~g the project. Reports will be available from t: ~e City up:~n req dest at the follc wing
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency - -
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TT 15993 AND DR 99-45
September 27, 1999
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development. -
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed
off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the
MMP Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City
department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required pedod
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the
monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified
to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The
monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the
Community Development Director pdor to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: TT15993 and DR 99-45 Applicant:_. Western Pacific
Initial Study Prepared by: Rudy Zeledon Date: September 27, 1999
· The use of low-emissions and high-energy CP/BO B/C As Necessary A
efficiency construction equipment. 4
· Utilization of electric or diesel-powered equipment CP/BO B/C As Necessary A
where feasible. 4
· Grading Plans state equipment shut off when not in CP/BO C Plan Check C
use. Extend constrjction period during smog 2
season (May-October)
· Encourage ride-sharing and transit incentives for CP B/C As Necessary ND
construction crew. 4
· Dust generated by the development shall be CP/BO C As Necessary A
retained on-site. 2/4
· Utilize, as mud' as possible, precoated natural CP/BO B/C As Necessary A/C
colored building r~ '~edals (water-based or
Iow-VOC coating) and manual coating or spray
equipment with high efficiency transfer.
· A minimum of 3-7 foot high be constructed along CP/BO B~C Pdor to the C/A 2
Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard (Lots issuance of
68-94) Building Permits 2
· Mechanical vent!~ation system to permit a '~vindow CP/BO B
closed" condition.. C
· Attic vents facing BaSe Line Road and Day Creek CP/BO B C
Boulevard will require an acoustical baffle. 2
· Preserve oak tree. CP B/C Prior to the A, B, D 1/2
issuance of
Building Permits
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14759 Page 2
' ' to Checklist Abbreviations
CDD - Communi~ Development Dim~or A - ~th Ea~ New Development A - On-site tns~ion 1 - W~hhold Re~ation of Final Map
CP - C~ Planner or designee B - Pdor To Constm~ion B - Other AgenW Pe~ I ~pmval 2 - W~hhold Grading or Building Pe~
CE - C~ Engineer or designee C - Throughout Constm~ion C * Plan Che~ 3 - W~hhold Cedifi~te of O~upan~
BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submi~al (Repo~s I Studies I Plans) 4 - Stop Woffi O~er
PO - Poli~ Captain or designee E - O~rating 5 - Retain ~pos~ of Bonds
6 - Revoke CUP
FC - Fire Chief or designe~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Tentative Tract 15993 and Development Review 99-45
SUBJECT: 94 Lot Subdivision
APPLICANT: Western Pacific
LOCATION: Northeast comer Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __/__
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planners letter of approval, and all Standard __/__
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building /
permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 3 years from the date of
approval.
2. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if /
building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the
,. :~ .. date of approval. No extensions are allowed.
Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which __/__
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herain,
Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan.
project No. TT 15993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ___ I__
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-site lighting plan. including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of
building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of
shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties.
8. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with/
all receptacles shielded from public view.
9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations. and / __/__
the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be __ I__1__
located ouf~ of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the /
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner
including proper illumination.
13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Ef~gineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list ¢f the
name and address of their officers on or before January 1 Of each and every year and whenever ....
said information changes.
14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property '.___/
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
2
Project No. '/'r15993&DR99-45
Completion Date
15. Six*foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. Ira double wall /
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
properly owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's
perimeter.
16. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each /
support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two './~-inch lag bolts, to withstand high
winds..Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall
extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
17. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. /
18. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. /
19. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. I I
20. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be / /
manufactured products.
D. Building Design
1. All dwellings shall have the front, side and roar elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, /
detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Multiple ca~'garage driveways shall be taperod down to a standard two-car width at street.
F, Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
rec~,~,., ~ondations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.
· 3. /'JI privateSlopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater ~ope, but less than
2;~. slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosiun control. Slope planting required by this section shaft include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
project NO, TT 15993 & DR 99-45.
:ompletlon Date
follows: one 15-cJafion or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area. 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-
gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted
in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section
shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
5. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously __/__ __
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold
and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included __/__
in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division,
7. SPecial landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees. meandering
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line
Road, Day Creek Boulevard.
8.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, I.__
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
~. Environmental
1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of intedor noise attenuation
to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if
appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked
for conform.ance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
2. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required
to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City
to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation
measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents
shall be considered grounds for forfeit.
In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy),
the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior
to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identity the reporter as an individual
qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented.
H. Other Agencies :
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Sewice to determine the appropriate type and ./ /
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
4
Project No. TT15993&DR99-45
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: /
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and
waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and
air conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) cleady identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City pdor to permit issuance.
J. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanicel Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable cedes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and
Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to
existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,
Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant
.shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit
Issuance.
3. S~, eet addressesshall be prcvided b~/'.the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recerdation / I
and prior to issuance of buildi,~g. perm!t,~.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday __'/ /__
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
pm~ct No. TT 15993 & DR 9945
Completion Date
New Structures
1. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." --/'
L. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __ __/__
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a
California Registered Civil Engineer.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, {909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ."
M, Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, __
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal
encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or
tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails,
etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from
street centerfine):
Varies from 60 to 70 total feet on Base Line Road --I--/--
72 total feet on Day Creek Boulevard --/--/--
3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on /..__/
the final map.
4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall /
be dedicated to the City.
5. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum __ __/__
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn
lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests __ __/__
necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66,462 at such
time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement
shall provide for payment by the developer of all co~ls incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for ;, portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appr~,!sal report obtained
by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior
to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: Base
Line Road.
6
Projec~ No. Tr 15993 & DR 9945
Completion Date
N, Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, /
landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City
Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,
AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: /
Cu(o & A,C, Side- Drive Sb'eet Street Comm Median Bike Other
Stnmt Name Gutter Pvml walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail
Base Line Road
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item.
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety __1__
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a __/__
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and __/__
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or __/____
reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer.
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be S-inch (at intersectk,, ~s) ,.r ?-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
v!ith pull roF-e or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be in:talle,4 ,jh all comers of intersections per City /__/ .
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __1__1__
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A
sc -er25~99 7
project No. Ti'15993&DR99-45
Completion Date
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __/__ __
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __
4. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review__
and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets,
fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in
addition to any other permits required.
5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with__/__
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
O. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall__//
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape
Maintenance District: Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard.
2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __ I__1 __
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
3. All required. public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the /
developer until accepted by the City.
4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard.
p. Drainage and Flood Control
1.Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree tru. nk.
2. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to c~nvey overflows in the event of a blockage
in a sump catch basin on the public street.
Q~ Utilities ;,
provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, waier, gas,
electric power: telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
8
Project NO. TT 15993 & DR 9945
Comple~lon Date
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / __
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance
from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs
first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map
approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects.
R. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for /
all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT~ (909) 477-2730
FOR COMPLIANCE WffH THE FOLLOWING CONDfflONS:
S. General Fire Protection Conditions
1, Fire flow requirement shall be: 1,500 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b)
(Increase).
XA fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel prior to water plan approval.
X For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants /
shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel
after construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire hydrants are required, All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, /
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel,
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided priorto waterplan approval. Required hydrants, __/__
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on appreved brands and model numbers.
4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be /
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to / /
final inspection.
6. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, qs noted: / /
X All roadway'; per Rancho Cucamo~ga; ire Protection District Ordinance 32. / /
7. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be du6 to the Rancho / /
Cucamonga Fire Protection District as follows:
X $132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
sc -&,25/99 9
project No. TT t5993 & DR 99-45
Completion Date
PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
-IE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
T. Security Hardware
1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. /__ __
2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are
within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glas~ or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be
used.
3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. __
U. Windows
1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be/
lifted from frame or track in any manner.
V. Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
PM14038 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
October 27, 1999
Page 2
c. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval and removal of the Standard
Conditions of Approval Nos. A.7 and G.4 requiring reciprocal parking agreements and an easement
for a joint use ddveway for parcels 1 and 2, will not cause public health and safety problems; and
d. The extension is within the time limits established by State Law and local
ordinance.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environmental and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in complianca with the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgement of the Planning Commission, and further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations, which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considedng the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this
Commission hereby grants:
a. A time extension for.
PROJECT .APPLICANT EXPIRATION
Tentative Parcel Map 14038 Maple Place Partners, LLC September 9, 2000
b. Approval of a modification of Tentative Parcel Map 14038 to
remove Conditions of Approval No. A.7 and G.4 from Planning Commission
Resolution No. 92-115.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP 14038 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC - A request for an extension
and modification of the standard conditions of approval of a previously approved tentative
parcel map for the subdivision of 2.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer of
Arrow Route and Maple Place - APN 208-961-11. Related file: DR 99-33
BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 14038 was appmved by the Planning Commission on
September 9, 1992. In 1993, Senate Bill 428 automatically extended, by 24 months, the expiration date of
any tentative subdivision map that had not expired by September 13, 1993. As the map was still valid on that
date, Tentative Parcel Map 14038 was extended until September 9, 1996. In 1996, Assembly Bill 711
automatically extended, by 12 months, the expiration of any tentative subdivision map that had not expired
by May 14, 1996. As the map was still valid on that date, Tentative Parcel Map 14038 was extended until
September 9, 1997. On August 14, 1997, the City Engineer appmved a 12-month time extension extending
Tentative Parcel Map 14038 until September 9, 1998. On December 9, 1998, the Planning Commission
appmved a 12-month time extension extending Tentative Pamel Map 14038 until September 9, 1999. Prior
to expiration, the applicant filed the current time extension request.
ANALYSIS: Section 66463.5(c) of the Subdivision Map Act states that the City may approve a time
~xtension for a period or periods not exceeding a total of three years. Since the applicant received two
City-granted time extensions, this is the third of three possible time extension requests. Staff has analyzed
the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with current development criteria outlined in the
Industrial Area Specific Plan and Development Review 99-33 currently being processed for the tentative
pamel map site and on tonight's agenda. Based on this review~ the tentative parcel map meets the
development standards of the General Industrial District.
CONDITION MODIFICATION: Previously DR 91-12 was approved, on this site at the time Tentative
Parcel Map 14038 was conditioned and approved. DR 91-12 has since expired but Tentative Parcel Map
14038 has not. At the time, DR 91-12 had parcels 1 and 2 sharing a common driveway, and this was
reflected in the Tentative Pamel Map's conditions of approval. Presently being processed is Development
Review 99-33, the construction of four industrial buildings on this site. DR 99-33 proposes to construct four
driveways, one for each of the proposed bui Idings. The previously proposed common driveway of DR 91 - 12
has been el im inated making two of the previously appmved standard conditions for the pamel map irreleva.nt.
Staff has conceptually approved the four driveways and agrees that the following two previously approved
standard conditions should be eliminated with this time extension request:
ITEH E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PM 14038 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
October 27, 1999
Page 2
"No. A.7: Reciprocal parking agreements for parcels 1 and 2 and maintenance agreements ..
ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, landscaping, or parking areas shall bc
provided by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel
map."
"No. F.4: An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final parcel map
approval for parcels I and 2."
ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT: TheapplicantpreparedPartlofthcEnvironmentalChecklist. Staff
completed Pa~ II of the Environmental Checklist and found that certain environmental conditions hive
changed since the original project's approval. The project is located in an area identified aS'~btential habitat
for endangered or threatened species. As a result, a habitat assessment was required to determine potential
impacts, particularly to the federally-listed Delhi Sands Flower Loving.y!y (DSF). The results of the habitat
assessment indicate that the site does not support substantial areas of high quality or optimal DSF habitat The
report concludes that due to the highly disturbed nature of the site and relative isolation from undisturbed or
native habitats, proposed development of the 2.4 acre parcel will not likely result in adverse effects to DSF
or its habitat.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspaper, the property was posted and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius
of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one-year time
extension for Tentative Parcel Map 14038 through adoption of the attached resolution and issuance of a
Negative Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
Danja~mes~~
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ:PV:sd
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Time Extension Uniform Application Part I, Dated August 18, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Parcel Map
Resolution of Approval
ctn" OF P. ANCr D CUCA,.O,VaA UNIFORM
Comm,.,,',ity Oev.lopme,',t Oepa,'rm.,,tA pPLICA TION
,(- - ~. '~ 10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 PaFt ~
(909) 477-2750
· (staff use only) . :': :'::' · ':' ':" ........
Name of proposed Project RLE NO.: "~' p : r'n '. ')
,
N.~. Co~ne~ o~. Maple Ave. and A~o~ R~e H~qh~ayRE~TEDFILES:"
CegalCescnpoonofPmlec:(A~es~ofsPa~elN°) ~SeSSO~S Da~l ~p ~* ~k 208, ~age 9e, ~a~l 11.
9a~cel ~ No. 6206 ~ 59 - -
~1 26 of phoneNumber: 909-980--6868
Ape, cant'sNareD F~NumDef: 909-987-8183
83~ Haven Ave, S~e 200, ~cho Cuc~nga, ~ 9~730
S~ as
~ ~ ~ve
~ Commundy Plan Amendment O H~s~e DeveloDment >4 OU ~ Tentative Parcel Ma~
~ Condttional Use Pe~t O H~llside Development f 4 DU O Tentative Tract
(Non. COnst~ct~on) 0 Lot Uno Adl'ustmenf ~ VacJt~n of PuDl~c Ri~nt-of. waY =r
0 ~evelopmenfAgreeme~t O pre. AppficahonRewew ~ Ot~0r: ~c ~
~ E.qfe~a~nme~t Po~:t O ~pecs~c Plan Amen~mon~ ~.~:C! ~ ....... v~u.
4 Industrial Buildings Approx. 12,000 sq. feet each
I certify that I am presently the legal owner of the above-described property. Further, I acknowledge the filing ellhis
application and certify thai all of the above information is true and correct. (If the undersigned is different from the legal
rode owner. a letter of au~h, orizatinn must accom! an this form.____.)
Date : ~ · / TM
W. Pj. cha~ds, General Pa~'~cner Maple Place Par~nersL~LLC
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER
14038, AND MODIFYING STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THEREOF, FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 2.4 ACRES OF LAND INTO 4
PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF
THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MAPLE PLACE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 208-961-11
A. Recitals.
1. Maple Place Partners, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map
No. 14038, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinaf~er in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 9, 1992, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 92-115, thereby
approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Parcel Map No. 14038.
3. On August 14, 1997, the City Engineer granted a 12-month time extension pursuant to
Municipal Code 16.20.100 and Ordinance 534.
4. On December 9, 1998, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 98-90, thereby
approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, a 12-month time extension for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 14038.
5. On August 18, 1999, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month time extension.
6. On October 27, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date.
7. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 27. 1999, including ,written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is in substantial compliance with the
City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; and
b. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval and removal of the Standard
Conditions of Approval Nos. A.7 and G.4 requiring reciprocal parking agreements and an easement
for a joint use driveway for parcels I and 2, will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current
General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,
PM14038 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
October 27, 1999
Page 2
c. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval and removal of the Standard
Conditions of Approval Nos. A.7 and G.4 requiring reciprocal parking agreements and an easement
for a joint use ddveway for parcels I and 2, will not cause public health and safety problems; and
d. The extension is within the time limits established by State Law and local
ordinance.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environmental and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgement of the Planning Commission, and further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations. which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided .to the Planning Commission during the public
headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this
Commission hereby grants a time extensions for:
PROJECT APPLICANT EXPIRATION
Tentative Parcel Map 14038 Maple Place Partners, LLC September 9, 2000
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNeil, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
PM14038 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
October 27, 1999
Page 3
I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
THE CITY OF
RAI~CHO
Sg3_~Report
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP. Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-33 -
MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS - The development of four industrial building~
totaling 49,930 square feet on 2.4 acres of land in the General Industrial Distdct
(Subarea 8) of the Industdal Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer
of Arrow Route and Maple Place - APN: 208-961-11. Related files: Vadance
99-08 and Parcel Map 14038.
VARIANCE 99-08 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS - A request to reduce the
required 5-foot interior rear building setback to zero feet for a new industrial
building on 2.4 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer of Arrow Route and
Maple Place - APN: 208-961-11. Related files: Development Review 99-33 and
Parcel Map 14038.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning:
North - Industrial Buildings; General Industrial, Subarea 8, Industrial Area Specific Plan
South - Industrial Buildings; General Industdal, Subarea 8, Industdal Area Specific Plan
East Industrial Buildings; General Industrial, Subarea 8, Industrial Area Specific Plan
West Industrial Buildings; Industrial Park, Subarea 7, Industrial Area Specific Plan
B. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - General Industrial
North - General Industrial
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial
West Industrial Park
C. Site Characteristics: The site is surrounded to the north by the Fisher Mills industrial building
and a rail spur, to the east by a multi-tenant industrial building respecting a 6-foot setback from
the common properly line (east property line of site), to the west by multi-tenant industrial
buildings across Maple Place, and to the south by industrial buildings across Arrow Route. The
ITEMS F & G
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October 27, 1999
Page 2
site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. There is an existing row of Pine
trees along the north site boundary that provides a visual screen for the Fisher Mills tanks to the
north, Arrow Route is designated a Special Boulevard with enhanced design cdteria.
D. Parkinq Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided
Building 1
Office 1,000 1/250 4 4
Warehouse 11,479 1/1000 11 12
Building 2
Office 1,000 1/250 4 6
Warehouse 10,024 1/1000 10 10
Building 3
Office 1,000 1 ~250 4 4
Warehouse 12,498 111000 12 12
Building 4
Office 1,000 1 ~250 4 4
Warehouse 11,929 1/1000 1._~2 1.~2
Total 49,930 61 64
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The four buildings are to be located on four separate parcels so that each can be
owned and operated by different users. A combination of tilt up concrete panels, sandblasted
concrete, and glazing are proposed to provide adiculation and visual interest.
B. Variance: The applicant is requesting a variance from the 5-foot interior rear setback
requirement applicable to Building 4. The applicant contends that the setback will result in
unusable area given that the existing building to the east has a 6-foot setback. Staff agrees
that requiring adherence to the 5-foot setback would result in unused area to the rear of
Building 4 that would pose a maintenance burden in excess of any agsthetic benefit. The 5-
foot setback area would provide little benefit because any landscaping would not be visible to
motorists from Arrow Route.
C. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project on
September 14, 1999, and recommend approval with conditions, (Exhibit "F").
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October 27, 1999
Page 3
D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical and Grading Review Committees have
reviewed the project and recommend approval with conditions as outlined in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant and
staff completed Part II. Staff identified potential impacts related to biological resources. The
property is located in an area recently identified by the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife
Service as a potential habitat for the endangered Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSF).
Habitat assessment and biological surveys were conducted by Impact Sciences (October 2,
1998), consulting biologists permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The results of the
surveys indicate that the subject site has a low potential to support the Delhi Sands Flower
Loving Fly due to the lack of any substantial open, sandy area; relatively dense coverage of
non-native vegetation; and past agricultural practices. In addition, the site does not function
as a habitat corridor since it is surrounded by existing development. No other unique, rare, or
endangered animal species are known to be located on the project site. If the Planning
Commission concurs, then issuance of a Negative Declaration is in order.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily.
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Review 99-33 and Variance 99-08 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with
Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
City Planner
BB:BLC:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Action dated September 14, 1999
Exhibit "G" -'initial Study Part II
Resolution of Approval for Development Review 99-33
Resolution of Approval for Variance 99-08
Site Utilization Plan
MaplePlace Maple Place
Par ners, LLC Business Park ""' ,. ...........
8311 Haven Ave. Suite 200
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.Raneho Cueamonga, California
/
/.
MAPLE PLA_~ ._~
~ -, ___ _
~_~ ...................... )eta ~ P
~p~ m~ Maple Place o
LL
Partners, C Bll~//leS$ P~t/'j~ ~'~', '~'~7'~' ~'~
8311 Haven Ave. Suite 200
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Rancho Cucamonga, California
Conceptual Grading Plan
_ _ ~ .....~ .....
- - -- - . , I
Maple Place Maple P/ace
Partners,LLC Business Park " ....."""'. ".
8311 Haven Ave. Suite 200
Raneho Cueamonga, Ca. Rancho Cucamonga, California
Conceptual Grading Plan Sections
SECTION B - B
:::: . ~ "". .................~ ........
SEC~ON A - A
SCALE= ~RT. 1'" 3'
HORIZ. 1' "30,
Maple Place MSp/eP/ace
~.~t.e~, ~c Business Park -""""' ....."
~ancho Cucamon~a, Ca.~aDcho Cucamon~a, California'='~,-~-~ ....
% " ..... Conceptual Landscape Plan
;~o-__. ......
8311 Haven Ave. S~te 200 "~';~.',~
B~neho Cucamonga, Ca. Rancho Cucsmonga, California
!
South ' ,
East
Exterior Elevations
Building
Maple'Place
8311 Haven Ave. Suite 200
Ranch9 Cucamonga, Ca. Rancho Cuc amonga, California ~ .-~-~ .....
West
South
Rast
Exterior Elevations
Building 3
Maple Place Maple Place .
Partners, LLC BllS, ll'2eSS P,91'k7 ["" ...........
8311 Haven Ave. Suite 200
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Rancho Cucamonga, California
South
Exterior Elevations
Building 4
MaplePlace Map..le Place
partners, LLC Business Pal'j[{
~3axnlchUoa~Z~a~ghgsau, it~a.z°° aancho Cucamonga, California
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
9:00 p.m. Brent Le Count September 14, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE
PARTNERS - The development of four industrial buildings totaling 59,930 square feet on 2.4 acres
of land in the General Industrial District, Subarea 8 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at
the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Maple Place - APN: 208-961-11.
~: The site is surrounded to the north by the Fisher Mills industrial building and
a rail spur, to the east by a multi-tenant industrial building respecting a 6-foot setback from the
common property line (east property line of site), to the west by industrial buildings across Maple
Place, and to the south by industrial buildings across Arrow Route. The site slopes from north to
south at approximately 2 percent. There is an existing row of Pine trees along the north site
boundary which provides a visual screen for the Fisher Mills tanks to the north. Arrow Route is
considered a Special Boulevard with enhanced design criteria.
Variance: The applicant is requesting a variance from the 5 foot interior rear setback requirement
applicable to Building 4. The applicant contends that the setback will result in unuseable area given
that the existing building to the east has a 6-foot setback. To the contrary, staff's opinion is that the
5-foot setback, in tandem with the existing 6-foot building setback, provide an 11 -foot overall setback
landscape opportunity. This would be visible from Arrow Route.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding
this project:
1. The building design consists of painted tilt-up concrete with reveal lines. It lacks a second
primary building material as required by Planning Commission Policy No. 89-158. Use of
sandblasted concrete or brick veneer as a second primary building material to comply with and
enhance the elevations.
2. Provide additional articulation to the office entries for variety and visual interest.
3. The northeast corner of Building 1, southeast and southwest comers of Building 4 should
receive the same level of design enhancement as the other elevations given their visual
exposure.
4. Provide employee outdoor eating/plaza areas in front of the building/office entries instead of
placing them within parking area.
~: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
ommittee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Provide landscape planters around the perimeter of buiidi'ng walls exposed to public view.
Previous Development Review approved for the site showed substantial landscape areas
around the buildings. See attached Landscape Plan.
2. Provide enhanced landscaping such as, but not limited to increased number of tre~s,
specimen sized trees, accent trees, and larger shrubs at driveway entrances, around
employee outdoor eating/plaza areas, at the corner of Maple Place and Arrow Route, and
along the Arrow Route frontage given its status as a Special Boulevard.
EXHIBIT "F"
DRC COMMENTS
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
September 14, 1999
Page 2
3. Provide minimum 25-foot deep, on-site driveway throats to allow adequate vehicle stacking
distance. Driveway throats shall have decorative paving.
4. Relocate employee outdoor eating area for Building I away from railroad utility boxes at
northwest corner of site.
5. Provide meandering berms within landscape setback areas to screen parking and loading
areas from street. Note that Arrow Route is a Special Boulevard requiring further enhanced
landscaping, meandering sidewalk, and rolling berms.
6. Provide textured pavements such as interlocking pavers, textured or patterned colored
concrete, etc., across driveways
Policy issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Screen railroad control boxes and any other above ground equipment through the use of low
walls and landscaping.
2. The following landscaping density is required cumulatively:
1 tree per 30 linear feet of building wall
I tree per 30 linear feet of properly line (each parcel)
I tree per 3 parking spaces
Note that landscaping comments under Secondary issues above are in addition to the
minimums noted here.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the development plans to
address the above identified issues and submit for further Committee review.
Attachment
Desiqn Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to staff's comments with
the following revisions:
1. Increase the amount of sandblasted concrete on the office/entry portions of the buildings for
emphasis. Sandblasted concrete shall have either medium or heavy finish.
2. Use glazing' to match the office entry treatment on the southeast corner (south and east
elevations) of Building 4 to provide visual interest relative to Arrow Route.
3. The employee eating area locations are acceptable as proposed by the applicant.
DRC COMMENTS
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
September 14, 1999
Page 3
4. Instead of providing landscaping within truck loading areas, screen loading areas with
decorative, opaque gates.
5. The driveway throat depths are acceptable as designed.
6. The applicant agreed to provision of meandering berms, decorat ve driveway treatment, rail
control box screening, and landscape enhancements.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Development Review 99-33 and Time Extension for Tentative Parcel Map
14038
2. Related Files: Variance 99-08 and Development Review 91-12 (Expired)
3. Description of Project:
A request for the development of four industrial buildings totaling 49,930 square feet and a
time extension and modification of the standard conditions of approval of a previously
approved tentative parcel map for the subdivision of 2.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
northeast corner of Arrow Route and Maple Place - APN: 208-961-11. Related file:
Variance 99-08.
4. Project Sponsor°s Name and Address:
Maple Place Partners, LLC
8311 Haven Avenue, Suite 200
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial
6. Zoning: General Industrial. Subarea 8, of the Industrial Area Specific PLan
7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site vacant except for remnant vineyards and
is surrounded by existing industrial development.
8. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Brent Le Count
Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page ?
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
( ) Population and Housing (~') Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics
( ) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources
( ) Air Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Recreation
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(~") I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed: ~' ~
rB~ent~Le~Count, AICP ~J~'
Associate Planner
October 4, 1999
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
I. LAND USE A~b PLANNING. Would the proposal
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ( ) ( (v')
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ( ( ) ( (v')
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 4
,
d) Seiche h~zards? ( ( )
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ( ) (~)
t') Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading. or fill? ( ) ( ) (~)
g) Subsidence of the I~nd? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (~) ( )
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Comments:
h) The site is indicated to have Tujung~-Delhi soil, ~ssociation by figure V-2 of the
General Plan. This soil ~ssociation may have soil bea~ng c~pacities that can limit
development. A soils mpo~ will be required to asce~ain soil bearing c~p~cities and
as pa~ of the routine plan check procedures prior to issuance of permits.
4. WATER. ~//the proposal resulf
~) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pa~erns,
or the rate ~nd amount of suff~ce water runoff? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Exposure of people or prope~y to water relmed
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Discharge into su~ce water or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ( ) (~)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( (~)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ( ) ( (~)
~ Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct ~dditions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) (~) '
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundw~ter? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 5
S~nn'r. ant
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
P I M S
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/)
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (t/)
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( )
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) (~/)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( )
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) (~/)
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) (V')
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 6
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) (V) ( )
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( )
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and
vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V)
e) ~ldlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (f)
Comments:
a) The properly is located in an area recently identified by the U.S. Depa~ment of Fish
and ~ldlife Se~ice as a potential habitat for endangered or threatened species.
Habitat assessment and biological su~eys were required to determine potential
habitat value and any potential impacts, padicularly to the federally-listed Delhi
Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSF). Habitat assessment su~eys were conducted by
Impact Sciences (October 2, 1998), consulting biologists permi~ed by the U.S. Fish
and ~ldlife Se~ice. The results of the su~eys indicate that the subje~ site has a
low potential to suppod the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly due to the lack of any
substantial open, sandy area; relatively dense coverage of non-native vegetation;
and past agricultural practices. In addition, the site does not function as a habitat
corridor since it is suffounded by existing development.
8. ENERGY AND MINE~L RESOURCES. Would the
proposah
a) Conflict with adopted energy consedation
plans? ( ) ( ) ( )
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
ine~cient manner? ( ) ( ) ( )
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 7
9. HA~RDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides. chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Possible intederence with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( )
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
e) Increased tim hazard in areas with ~ammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
10. NOISE. ~11 the proposal result in:
a) increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( (~)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( (~)
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or affered
government se~ices in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
e) Other governmental se~ices? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners
Page
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ( ) ( (~/)
b) Communication systems? ( ( ) ( (v')
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( )
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (e/')
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) (v')
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( )
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( (~/)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( (v')
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v')
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) (
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 9
15. RECREATION. Would the proposak
a) Increase the demand br neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational bcilities? ( ) ( ) ) (~)
b) Affe~ existing recreational oppo~unities? ( ) ( ) ) (~)
16, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrid the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate impo~ant examples of the major
periods of California histo~ or prehisto~? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
b) Sho~ term: Does the project have the potential
to achieve sho~-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A sho~-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively b~ef, definitive period of time.
Long4erm impa~s will endure well into the
future.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that
am individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a proje~
am considerable when viewed in connection
with the effe~s of past projects. the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (~)
d) Subs~ntial adverse: Does the project have
environmental effe~s which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, _
either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
DR 99-33 Maple Place Partners Page 10
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering. program EIR. or other CEQA process,
one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following
earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(v') General Plan EIR
(Certified April 6, 1981)
(t/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(~/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR
(Certified September 19, 1981 ) .
(~/) Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map
14038 Time Extension. Approved by Planning
Commission December 9, 1999
I
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Development Review 99-33 and Time Extension for Parcel Map 14038
Public Review Period Closes: October 27, 1999
Project Name: Project Applicant: Maple Place Pariners, LLC
project Location (also see attached maP): Located at the northeast comer of Arrow Route and MaPle
Place - APN: 208-961-11.
Project Description: A request for the development of four industrial buildings totaling 49,930 square
feet and a time extension and modification of the standard conditions of approval of a previously
appmved tentative parcel map for the subdivision of 2.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Related file: Vadance 99-08.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted
an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a
significant effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. Reasons to support this finding am included in the attached Initial Study. The project
file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the ~'eview period.
October27, 1999
Date of Determination Adopted By
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 99-33, THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR INDUSTRIAL
BUILDINGS TOTALING 49,930 SQUARE FEET ON 2.4 ACRES OF LAND
IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MAPLE PLACE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 208-961-11.
A. Recitals.
1. Maple Place Partners filed an application for the approval of Development Review
No. 99-33, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occuh'ed.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on October 27, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the northeast comer of Arrow
Route and Maple Race with a street frontage of 156 feet on Arrow Route and 623 feet on Maple
Place and and is presently vacant and improved with remnant vineyards; and
b. The properties to the north, south, east, and west of the subject site are
developed with industrial buildings; and
c. The subject site is in an area indicted to be potential habitat for the Delhi Sand
Flower Loving Fly (DSF), a federally listed species; however, biological surveys show the site
does not support adequate DSF habitat and no flies were found; and
d. The project design includes preserving an existing mature row of trees along
the north project boundary which provide screening for large industrial tanks to the north; and
e. The project will provide convenient and efficient use of the site for small
industrial users consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
f. The project will not increase traffic flow in the area beyond that anticipated for
the surrounding street system.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October 27, 1999
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above. this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan;
and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development
Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration
and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. based upon
the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission
has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard
tO the application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated
into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole.
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project. there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning
Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1od) of Title 14 of the Califomia Cede of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition
set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October 27, 1999
Page 3
1) Increase the amount of sandblasted concrete on the office/entry
portions of the buildings for emphasis. Sandblasted concrete shall
have either medium or heavy finish.
2) Employee outdoor eating areas shall be graded flat to ensure
usability.
3) Use glazing to match the office entry treatment on the southeast
comer (south and east elevations) of Building 4 to provide visual
interest relative to Arrow Route.
4) Screen loading areas with decorative wrought iron, opaque gates.
5) Provide decorative ddveway paving within the driveway throats.
6) Provide meandering berms along both street frontages.
7) Screen railroad control boxes and any other above-ground
equipment through the use of low walls and landscaping.
8) Provide enhanced landscaping at the comer of Maple Place and
Arrow Route; along the Arrow Route frontage, given its status as a
Special Boulevard; at driveway entrances; and around employee
outdoor eating/plaza areas, such as, but not limited to, increased
number of trees, specimen sized trees, accent trees, and larger
shrubs.
En ineedn Division
1) Tentative Parcel Map 14038 shall record, prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
2) Curb-adjacent sidewalk on Maple Place shall be 6 feet wide.
Sidewalks shall wrap ddve approaches to cross at the zero curb
face. Provide additional fight-of-way as necessary. If there are
special pavers, they shall be located behind the public sidewalk.
3) To reflect new or relocated improvements, existing Drawing No. 328
shall be revised and/or new improvement plans prepared.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 99-33 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October27, 1999
Page 4
BY:
Larry T, McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:,
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Development Review 99-33
SUBJECT: 4 new industrial buildinqs
APPLICANT: Maple Place Partners :..
LOCATION: Northeast corner Arrow Route/Maple Place
_ S5
i~L~ ,,~F .THE FOL'L'OWING'CONDITIONS APPL i~ TO~YOUR'PROJEC T.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
General Requirements CompleUon Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __ __/__
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,
to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a coud to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such
participation shaft not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. Approval of Development Review 99-33 is granted subject to the approval of Vadance 99-08. __ __/__
3. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __ __/__
Conditions, shaft be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or /
approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are
allowed.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which __/__
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein
Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
1
sc-~5,se . =
Project No. DR 99-33
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business act v ty being commenced thereon, all Conditions /
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pdor to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /
submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code __ / /
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
7, A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and / /
approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of
building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of
shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties.
8, All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc,, shall be / /
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
9, All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /
including proper illumination,
D. Building Design
1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated
with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be
included in building plans,
2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doom to match main
building colors.
E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Allparklngspacesshallbe9feetwideby18feetlong. Whenasideofanyparkingspaceabuts
a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet
wide,
2.All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances,
and exits shall be striped per City standards.
Project No. OR 99-33
Completion Date
4. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for __/___
commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If
covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet.
F. Landscaping
1, A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping __/__ __
in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects shall be specimen size trees - 24- __/__ __
inch box or larger.
3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking
stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building.
5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
6. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible
for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted
areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and
debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning,
fedilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material
shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be irestailed within the public right-of-way on the /
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, __
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
9. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of build ing permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth
characteristics of the selected tree species.
10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / /__
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
G. Signs
1. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and __/__/__
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
General Requirements
1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: --/-/--
Project No. DR 99-,33
Completion Date
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
c. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams. water and
waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and
air conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., 'IF #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the
outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage
to the City prior to permit issuance.
5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the
Building and Safety Division.
I. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approVed prior to construction. All plans shall be
marked with the project file number (i.e.. DR 99-33). The applicant shall comply with the latest
adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National
Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and
Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new industrial development or addition to an existing
development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees,
Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the
Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance.
3.Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday. with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
J. New Structures
1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering
use, area, and fire-resistiveness.
sc.at2s,~ . :_
Proled NO. DR 99*33
;ompletion Date
2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). __ __/__
3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. /
4. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." /
5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A /
6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with USC Table 5-A. /
K. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __ __1 __
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to __/__1__
perform such work.
3, The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. _ / /
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Comer propen"/line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards, I--
2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for
approved openings: Arrow Route.
3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-Way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on __/__
the final map.
4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall
be dedicated to the City.
M, Street Improvements
1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Street Name Gutter F%'mt v,-alk Appr. Lights Trees Trail island Trail
Arrow Route
Maple Place X .
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b)' Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined 'during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) curb adjacent sidewalk on Maple Place.
5
SC.&,25/99 . =
Pmjed No. DR 99-33
Completion Date
2. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety /
lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior
to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and /
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or /
reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections far future
traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City
Engineer.
Notes:
(1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of
200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel
with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with /
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A
cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be /
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. /
3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
N, Public Maintenance Areas
1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
sc-s~s,se 6
project No. DR99-33
Completion Date
Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and
the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance
from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs
first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map
approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other
residential projects.
P. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for
all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE pREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UN IT, (909) 477-2730,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Q. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Fire flow requirement shall be: 3,000 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b)
(Increase).
X A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/develoPer and witnessed by fire department /
personnel prior to water plan approval,
X For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants /
shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel
after construction and prior to occupancy.
2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed,__ __/__
and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i .e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel,
3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior towater plan approval. Required hydrants, __/__
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with
a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
4. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to /
final inspection.
5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below:
X Other: 1997 UBC. I__1__
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacturing, spray painting, ~ammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact
Project No. DR 99-33.
Completion Date
the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed
operations.
6. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of
sprinkler system.
7. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below:
X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15.
8. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32.
9. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet
6 inches from the ground up. so as not to impede fire apparatus.
10. A building directory shall be required, as noted below:
X Standard Directory in main lobby.
11. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall
be submitted pdor to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific
details and ordering information.
12.Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per *plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho
Cucomonga Fire Protection District as follows:
X $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).**
**Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems
(sprinklers, hood systems. alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon
submittal of plans.
13. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, /
UFC, UPC, UMC. and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
R. Security Lighting
1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /
These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell.
2. All buildings shall have minima} security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, __ __/__
with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the
entire development.
3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. /
S. Security Hardware
1. One-inch single Cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are /
within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be
used.
project No, OR 99-33.
Completion Care.
2, All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices,
Building Numbering
1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime
visibility.
2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall
be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to
background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE
NO. 99-08, REDUCING THE REQUIRED 5-FOOT INTERIOR REAR
BUILDING SETBACK TO ZERO FEET FOR A NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
ON 2.4 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
(SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MAPLE PLACE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-961-11.
A. Recitals.
1. Maple Race Partners filed an application for the issuance of Vadance No. 99-08 as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vadance request
is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3, All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hersby found. determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals,
Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 27, 1999, including written and oral staff repods, togetherwith
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at the nodheast comer of Arrow Route
and Maple Place with a street frontage of 156 feet on Arrow Route and 623 feet on Maple Place and
is presently vacant and improved with remnant vineyards; and
b. The propedies to the nodh, south, east, and west of the subject site are developed
with industrial buildings; and
c. Provisions of the 5-foot setback would pose a hardship for the property owner as
it would be difficult to propedy maintain; and
d. There are unique drcumstances applicable to the subject property, in that there is
a large industrial building to the east which would cause the setback area, if provided, to take on an
alley like appearance; and
e. The proposed vadance would not constitute granting of a spedal privilege, as many
other buildings in the area have zero foot rear setbacks; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR NO. 99-08 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October 27, 1999
Page 2
f. The proposed variance would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare
in that the setback area, if provided, would not be readily visible from Arrow Route and therefore,
would provide little aesthetic value.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of the Development Code.
b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the spedfled regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.
d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district.
e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall. certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR NO. 99-08 - MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS
October 27, 1999
Page 3
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO. I
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DENYING USE DETERMINATION
99-04 AND DETERMINING THAT THRIFT STORES ARE NOT SIMILAR TO
GENERAL RETAIL AND ARE NOT pERMITrED IN THE APPLICABLE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. Mennonite Central Committee filed an application for the approval of Use Determination
99-04. as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. .Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on October 27, 1999. including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The use in question is not of a similar nature, operation, and intensity as those
businesses designated as general retail stores, classified as a permitted use under the
Neighborhood Commercial distdct category.
b. The use in question is synonymous with second-hand stores, which is a use
allowed in certain zones by the Development Code.
c. The use in question does not meet the purpose and the intent of the district in
which it is proposed.
d. The use in question does not meet and conform to the applicable goals and
objectives of the General Plan.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this
Commission hereby denies Use Determination 99-04.
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
ApPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THE CITY OF
~ANCHO CUCAHONCA
DATE: October 27,1999
TO: ~ ''~ "' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION 99-04 - MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE THRIFT
STORE - A request to determine that a thrift store is similar to a General
Store, which is a permitted use within the Neighborhood Commercial District of
the Development Code.
BACKGROUND: The applicant, Mennonite Central Committee, recently came to the City for a
Business License. Staff brought to his attention that a thrift store business is not listed in the
Development Code as a permitted use in the Sunrise Center and advised him that a Use
Determination would be required if the use were pursued for this center. Exhibit "A" is the
property manager's letter requesting the Use Determination. Exhibit "B" is the letter from the
Chairman of the Mennonite Central Committee Thrift Store describing the intended use at
Sunrise Center.
ANALYSIS:
A. Sunrise Center: The shopping center is generally located at the southwest corner of
Carnelian Street and Base Line Road. This center was developed before the City was
incorporated and is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The uses in the center
include a hardware store, paper supply company, hair salon, fabric store, donut shop.
bookstore, shoe repair, stamp store, card shop, music store, pet store, and several
restaurants.
B. Description of the Proposed Thrift Store: According to the applicant, the thrift store will
provide a high quality thrift service consisting of 50 percent of used clothing, 15 percent of
used furniture, and less than 25 of percent new products. There will be no consignment
and all proceeds are given to World Hunger Relief through the Mennonite Central
Committee. This store is an extension of the Southern California Festival and Sale that
takes place every May in the City of Upland at the Pacific Christian Center.
C. Current Codes and Description of Neighborhood Commercial District: The Development
Code lists "second-hand stores and pawn shops" as a permitted use in the General
Commercial zone and not permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial zone. Ample
opportunity exists for locating thrift stores in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the General
ITEM H
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
USE DETERMINATION 99-04
October 27, 1999
Page 2
Commercial zone: 1) Virginia Dare Business Center, 2) Deer Creek Village, 3) Historic
downtown AIta Loma along Amethyst Street north of Base Line Road, 4) Northwest and
southwest comers of Hermosa Avenue and Arrow Route, 5) Portions of Grove Avenue
between 8th Street and Arrow Route, 6) Southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow
Route, 7) 115 Freeway and Cherry Avenue, and 8) The Cask N Cleaver property. The
Foothill and Etiwanda Specific Plans and Terra Vista and Victoda Community Plans do not
list thdft stores or second-hand stores. The Development Code does not have definitions
for thrift stores, second-hand stores, or general retail stores. The Neighborhood
Commercial zone is defined as a district intended to provide areas for immediate day-to-
day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood.
D. Is a Thrift Store Similar to a General Retail Store? Staff believes that the Development
Code listing of "second-hand stores and pawn shops" as a specific use was intended to
separate and give distinction to said use apart from the category "general retail store". In
a report to the Planning Commission in 1995, staff stated that "thrift store" and "second-
hand store" are synonymous. The Planning Commission agreed with staffs interpretation
that a thdft store and second-hand store are one and the same use. Thrift stores can be
simply defined as the sale of used (i.e. second-hand) merchandise including clothing,
furniture, toys, and appliances. Staff surveyed surrounding cities to see whether they
allow such use in Commercial zones and whether they have a definition for second-hand
store. As shown in Exhibit "C," Upland, Fontana, and Redlands have a definition for
second-hand store. Some cities surveyed classify them as retail stores and allow them in
General Retail zones. If a thrift store is determined to fall under the general retail store
use category, then it would be a permitted use in any Neighborhood Commercial district
within the City.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission determine that a thrift store is
not similar to a general retail store by adopting the attached Resolution of Denial, and direct
staff to initiate a Development Code Amendment to include the appropriate definitions.
City Planner
BB:EVVMs '
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Property Manager's letter dated September 23, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Letter from the Chairman of the Mennonite Central Committee dated
October 15, 1999
Exhibit "C"- Definitions of Second-hand stores - Upland. Fontana, and Redlands
Exhibit "D"- Development Code Land Use Matrix
Exhibit "E" - Site Plan for Sunrise Center
Resolution of Denial
BAND Y-SHRYER
20709 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 101
Diamond Bar, California 91789-3847
(909) 594-5498 Fax (909) 594-7367
September 23, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Raneho Cueamonga, CA 91730
Re: Application for Use Det~n/~nafion
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Enclosed ar~ a Uniform Application for Use Determination and our cheek in the sum of
$315.00 for the fee.
We hereby request your approval of the application to open a Thrift Store in the Sumize
Shopping Center. As a retail sales business which will provide lower cost n~v and used
clothing and household goods, we feel thi~ use is consistent and complimentary with the other
rises ill Our Center,
Please advise as to when we can expect a detem~nation of this applieatiom Thank you for
your consideration.
Sincerely,
Property Manager
'IP.,B
Enclosures
EXhibit "A" UD 99-04
SUNRISE SHOPPING CENTER - Baseline at Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, California
PROPERTY MANAGERS: Leasing - THOMAS E. BANDY On-Site - MARC SHRYER
STAN LONG, CHAIRMAN
E C E ! V E D *~L o09> 9s2-9~4~
FAX (909) 987-8994
October 15, 1999 OCT 181B~3
City ofRancho Cucamonga City ot Rancho Cucamong
To whom it may concern: ~ qning Division
Conceming the Thrit~ Store using the facility at 8673A, Sunrize Center,
Rancho Cucamonga
I am Stan Long, Chairman of the Planning Committee for the Thrift Store.
The Thrift Store is an extension of the Southem Califomia Festival and Sale,
Incorporated. The Sale is held each May at the Pacific Christian Center in
Upland. The function of the two activities is to raise money for Wo~d
Hunger and Relief, through the Mennonite Central Committee whose main
office is in Akron, PA and also an office in Reedly, CA. There are 50 Thrift
Stores throughout United States and Canada (see enclosed insert).
As owner of Long's Christian Bookstore, we can guarantee that the Thrift
Store will be a First Class Store. A couple has been employed to serve as
supervisors.
There will be a good mix of product. Much of the clothing will have the
original-tags from the manufacturer. There will be new music tapes, small
items of fumimre, gilts and plants.
We feel strongly that the Thrift Store will be an asset to the Sunrize Center
and to Rancho Cucamonga and will contribute revenue to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
For more information, call Stan Long (909)987-0406.
Franchise number 33-0868761
Board of Equalization # SR EH 97-604057 Exhibit "B" UD 99-04
Stan~<'~'~Lun~Zn
Thrift Store Planning Committee
Mennonite SPONSORED BY
Central BRETHREN IN CHRIST AND MENNONITE CHURCHES
PACIFIC CHRISTIAN CENTER
Committ,ee= 800 wEST ARROW HIGHWAY. UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786
.. · , .-. , -.:
FOR WORLD HUNGER & RELIEF
The Southern California Festival and Sale will be an
opportunity to raise funds to meet human needs. People from
Southern California and Arizona will enjoy the festive, country
fair atmosphere.
The big auction ring features antiques and colorful
handmade quilts. Artisans provide pottery, needlework,
wooSyork, paintings and other craft items for the shops. Church
groups set up food booths selling pancakes, hamburgers, and
special ethnic foods, aS well as homemade breads and pastries.
The Relief Sale also expresses Christian compassion for
those who are less fortunate. All proceeds from the Sale go to the
international relief, development, and service ministries of the
Mennonite Central Committee: (MCC).
MCC's relief work involves providing material aid such as
wheat, beans, clothir~g, and medical supplies to meet emergency
needs. Long-term development workers including teachers,
engineers, nurses, and agriculturists promote a better life for
individuals and communities.
Ninety percent of MCC's budget goes directly into these
ministries.
Nearly a thousand MCC volunteers feed the hungry and
bring good news to the poor and those in need in over 50
countries around the world.
Agricultural development and water conservation projects,
for example, respond to the people's growing need for food and
water in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. MCC community
development workers, with local church people, discover ways to
improve life in local communities in North America and overseas.
With the support of people who attend the Relief Sale,
MCC helps to pull down barriers that separate people from each
other and from God.
"People Helping People In The Name o.f Christ"
CITY Of UPLAND
Section 6801,1.4
(a) "A (secondhand dealer), as used in this part, means and includes any person,
copartnership, firm or corporation whose principal business is primarily that of
engaging in buying, selling, trading, taking in pawn, accepting for sale on
consignment, accepting for auctioning or auctioning secondhand tangible personal
property."
CITY OF FONTANA
(a) "Second Hand Store means any premises used for the sale or handling of used
goods including establishments for the sale or trade of used clothingrfu~'iture and
appliances."
CITY OF REDLANDS
(a) Second Hand Store constitutes only used material sold within an enclosed building.
Excludes junkyards.
Note: Many cities surveyed such as Ontario, La Verne, San Dimas and Hemet do not
list a definition of second hand or thrift stores, but classify the use as a retail store,
permitted within a General Retail zone.
Exhibit "C" UD 99-04
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. I O. 030
~ OP NC ! GC
Use
C
25 Equipment rental yards.
26. Electronic goods (i.e. TV's, stereos, radios, p p
VCR's) sales and service.
27. Fast-food restaurants. C C P
-- p P
28. Feedf Tack stores. ~ ~ ~
p P P
"29. Flodst shops. .;_.._ ~ ~ ~
~ p P
30. Food stores and supermarkets, ' * ~
31. Furniture stores, rapair and upholstery. P ~ P
am) 32. General retail stores. : P P
33. Hardware stores. _____ P P
34. Home improvement centers. __ ~ ~ ~
a. Matedal stored and sold within enclosed p p
buildings.
b. Outdoor storage of material such as C
lumber and building materials.
35. Hotels and Motels. C -' P
_ ~ p P
36. Ice Machines (outdoor). ~ ~ ~
37. Janitodal services and supplies. P P
~ p P
38. Jewelry stores.
39. Laundry self-service. ~ P P
~ C C
40. Liquor stores. ~ ~
41. Kiosks for key shops, film drops, etc. in parking . p p
lots.
42. Locksmith shop. P P
43. Massage establishments. C
44. Mini-storage for public use (no outdoor C
storage).
45. Mortuaries and cemeteries. C C C
p = Permitted Use
C = Conditional Use Permit required 3196
17.10-5
Exhibit "D" UD 99-04
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 10. 030
Use OP NC GC
46. Music, dance, and martial arts studio. p p
47. Newspaper and magazine stores. p p p
48. Nurseries and garden supply stores; provided.
in the NC district, all equipment. supplies and
material am kept within an enclosed area. and P p
pmv!ded that fertilizer is stored in packaged
form only.
4~. Office and business machine stores. p p p
50. Office supply stores, p p
51. Parking facilities(commercial) where fees are
charged. P P
5?,. Pet shop. p p
53. Political or philanthropic headquarters. p p p
54. Plumbing shop and supplies. , p
55. Photocopy. p p p
56. Printing shops. p
57. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. C
58. Restaurants (other than fast food).
a. With entertainment and/or cocktail lounge
and bar. C C C
b. Incidental serving of beer and wine but
without a cocklail lounge, bar, p p p
entertainment. or dancing.
59. Shoe stores. sales and repair. p p
60. Second-hand stores and pawn shops. p
61. Shopping Center subject to provisions in
Section 17.10.030-F.4. - C C
62, Spiritualist readings or astrology forecasting. , p
63. Sporting goods stores. p p
64. Stamp and coin shops. , p p
Permitted Use
Conditional Use PerTnit required
17.10-6 3/96
Proposed Thrift
Store
~'='1! ~'-.~' .... ,: ~ ~,
. <-,~,~.: '.;"'m~.~:,':,~.:,.,~t~~I~; ~I' ~~"~
.., ...... .~ ~ ~ ., ,-
: k;. I ' ~ ........
_.j~llll.llllll
I'1 """""""""""
Exhibil "E" UD 99~4
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DENYING USE DETERMINATION
99-04, DETERMINING THAT THRIFT STORES ARE NOT SIMILAR TO
GENERAL RETAIL AND ARE PERMITTED IN THE APPLICABLE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A, Recitals.
1. Mennonite Central Committee filed an application for the approval of Use Determination
99-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of October 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on October 27, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The use in question is not of a similar nature, operation, and intensity as those
businesses designated as general retail stores, classified as a permitted use under the
NeighborhoodCommercial district category.
b. The use in question is synonymous with second-hand stores, which is a use
allowed in certain zones by the Development Code.
c. The use in question does not meet the purpose and the intent of the district in
which it is proposed.
d. The use in question does not meet and conform to the applicable goals and
objectives of the General Plan.
3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this
Commission hereby denies Use Determination 99-04.
4. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
.,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
UP 99-04 - MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE THRIFT STORE
October 27, 1999
Page 2
BY:
Larry T, McNiel, Chairman
A'I'I'EST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
L
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
THE CITY OF
RaNC~O CUCAMONaA
StaffRel r
DATE: October 27, 1999
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: TRAIL PRIORITIES
BACKGROUND: The Alta Loma Riding Club met with staff this summer to discuss priorities
and funding for trail projects. Staff offered to assist the Club in developing their pdority list.
During the Planning Commission's deliberations concerning trail issues on Tentative Tract No.
16026, located on the west side of Amethyst Street, nodh of Valley View, Commissioner.
Mannerino asked staff to research the feasibility of using park fees or beautification fees for trail
projects.
ANALYSIS:
A. Trail Priorities: The City's Trail Implementation Plan adopted in 1991 sets forth trail
improvement priorities (see Exhibit "B"). The Trail Implementation Plan states that the
priorities should be reviewed annually through the City's budget process to adjust priority
based upon urgency, availability of funding, and revised cost estimates. The Alta Loma
Riding Club proposes that four trail projects be given funding priority:
1. Beryl Street - from Hillside Road to Almond Street
2. Sapphire Street - from Jennet Street to Hillside Road
3. Beryl Street - from Banyan to Wilson Streets
4, Banyan Street - from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue
Staff agrees that these locations would provide important linkages.
B. Fees: Trail projects, including land acquisition, design, and construction of improvements
can be funded using park and beautification fees. The Park Fee Ordinance No. 105 was
adopted "to provide for the development of park and recreational facilities through
subdivision, as a condition to the approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Parcel Map,
dedicate lands or pay fees in-lieu thereof for neighborhood and community park o_r
recreational purposes" (emphasis added). The City's General Plan states that multi-
purpose recreational trails, such as Community Trails and Regional Trails, are intended
ITEM I
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TRAIL PRIORITIES
October 27, 1999
Page 2
for recreational usage with the goal to "provide an interconnected system of riding,
bicycling and hiking trails." Clearly, trails are recreational facilities eligible for park fees,
Similarly, the Beauti~cation Fee was intended for streetscape enhancement through
landscaping of street parkways. The Sapphire Trail Demonstration project in the 1980s
was funded through beauti~cation fees and constructed a Community Trail including trail
surfacing, fencing and landscaping.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward this matter to
the Trails Advisory Committee for its review. Staff will then relay the Committee's comments to
the Planning Commission for consideration at a future meeting. The recommendation of the
Planning Commission would then be forwarded to the City Council for consideration in the
budget process for Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
Respectf submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DC:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Alta Loma Riding Club
Exhibit 'B" - Trail Implementation Plan Priorities
Exhibit "C" - Master Plan of Trails,
8-1.~ Specific Plans &; Conununl~ Plans: The (';liforllja Government Code (Sec~on 65450) ailows local
governments to prepare specific plans that will establish site development regulations, including areas to ~r. uain
" open space, such as trai1.~ and parks. The Industrial AsP. a, Etiwanda, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plans have
been adopted by the City for selected parts of the community. These Plans include master plans and design
standards for hiking, riding, and bicycling Wails. In a similar fashion, the City has adopted community plans, with
extensive trail networks, such as the Victoria, Tetra Vista, and Caryn planned communities. AH of these
documents offer Rancho Cucamonga the opportunity to provide trails by ~gulaRng the design and hyout of
development schemes."
8,1.5 Local Feeder Trails: A special mention is needed with regard to Local Feeder trails. Some of the existing
Local Feeder trails are d esignat~l by the General Plan A/asfer Plan o~Trdls, and the Hiking ,,nil Riding Mns ter Plan
contained herein, as being planned for public use as a Community Trail. The Local Feeder Wail easements are
established on the final subdivision map pursuant to conditions of appmvel on the tentative map. They are private
equestrian ,,.~,u,n~ents reserved for the use of all property owners within the given subdivision, To amend the
~ ~ge of Local Feeder trails within an existing subdivision to use by the general public would require the City to
acquire easement rights either by purc~ from the individual lot owners or an action in eminent domain for
public rights-of-way. With ~;ard to eminent domain action, the mlulsite showing of public need and nece~___~ity
to acquire the pwperty by eminent domain may be difficult to substantiate
8.3.6 Implied Dedication: The Genend Plan Masfer Plan ofThaas rev~!,~ that certain Community Trails are made
up of areas whe~ the public has for a number o f years traversed (apparently without argumen0 private property
togetfr~m~nepublicw~i~tothenext(eltherbyusInganexistingprivatei~ai~easement~rbysimpiycuttingacr~ss
vacant property). Such historic use may imply dedication to the public of trail acc~:ss rights under cuban, very
lindtad, circumstances. The theory of implied dedication -adve~e public use of private pwperty for five years
with~utsubstantia~interferencebythe~wn6~wasestab~ishedbyther~if~miaSupremeCourtInGi~nv~Santa
Cruz (1970). In that case, a road, parking area, and beach strip were privately owned; however, the public
reg~*~:H~yuseditfor~shing~swimmIngand~ther~t~creati~na]pm~ses~verape~d~fmanyyears~N~ne~fthe
private property owners had made any serious objections and the City of Santa Cruz had improved the a~.a. The
Supreme Court held that this constituted an implied dedication to the public and ruled that the only proof
required is that persons use the property believing that there was a public right to do so, without objection or
Interf~-. d~ce, for more than five years. Subsequently, the legislature adopted California Ci vii Code Section 1009
~quiring "express wrii~n, irrevocable offer of dedication of such properly to such use.* Accordingly, any public
use of private property to Invoke the Gion rule would have te have commenced at, or prior tu, approximately 1965
(e.g., at least five years of public use). If indeed there is a p,oper situation as described briefly above, the City of
Rancho Cucamonga could establish its rights te the hail by a "quiet title" action te the hail easement.
8.4 PHASING OF TItAlL IMPItOVEMENTS
Tho of b o,, .ot In ,ded to be uth , thoy to ro.tes
of community-wide or ~ional significance. The Trail,, implementation Plan does not propose phases for
conslruction of trail pwjects. This is due, in part, to Rancho Cucamonga's fast r~owth which has resulted, and
will continue, in construction of Irails as a requl,~,~mt of development. Rather, the empb:.~i,~ is on identifying
priorities for possible pmjeets to be used in preparing future budgets and capital impwvement programs.
8.5 COMMUNITY HIKING &'It'iDlNGi Tfi IL'IM'PItOVEMENT
The foliowing priority list of capital improvement projects addr~,~,~ improvement and t~habiliation of existing '
trails and some pwjeets currently In planning stages. Pwjects should be reviewed annually through th6 City's
established budget review process to adjust priority, as needed, based upon urgency, availabtiity of funding, and
revised cost estimates.
1. Alta Loma Storm Drain Trail - Remove fence and gate barricades where nec~-y to provide hail access
pursuant to ~oint use agreement with San Benardino County Flood Control District. Install trail si~in~ ~s
needed, particularly at trail entrances. This section of trail follows the flood conre31 channel and basins from the
exis~ngtenninus~faC~mmunityTrai~withinthetract~cated~nthewestside~fHerm~sa~be~w~ .~ '
the lower basins above Banya~ An important north-south trail could be established with minimal investment-
~ - Obtain riSht-of-way and construct trail link from Archibald west to Tract ~ 1626. This trail section
would provide access to the Demems Channel Regional Trail and Front Line Regional Trail, and would also
provide access to I-~rilage Park, for residents in northeast Alta Loma. This section of trail passes across upper
Demens P,a,~in (San Bernardino County Flood Control District) private property at the end of Amethyst Street,
and alon~ ~private local feeder trail easement at the north end~f Tract 9521 or, alternatively; above Tract 9306.
3. Beechwood/Wilson Trail - Obtain fight-of-way and construct n,i,-~ing !ink at 570 ~ Iasper St~et. When Tract
~015 was originally hid out, a vital easement through the side yard on Lot 2~ was not provided. This section of
trai~isthe~uly~apinan~therwisec~n~inu~ustrai~fr~xnthewesternCitylimitstoHellman~whichwinultimate~y
extend east all the way to the Deer Creek Channel Regional T rail. T rail users west of Jasper would get a "strai ght
shot" trail to Heritage Park and the Demens Channel Regional Trail.
4. SanDhire Trail o Demonstration pro}ect to reconslract existing parkway to a trail from Banyan to Hillside. This
secti~ on the west side of Sapphire is in,t~,o~red to varying des, e~:s, in some cases with sidewalks. Numerous
local feeder trails spill out onto the pavement. The speed and increasing volume of traffic on Sapphir make it a
high priority for improvement. The trail would fit into the existing right-of-way dedication.
~- Reconstruct parkway to accomodate trail from I-l,.nman to Amahyst. Hill ~ide is developed with
full street improvements and front-on homes. Completion of this section will provide access to Heritage Park and
Demens Channel Regional Trail for property owners east of Amethyst.
6. Ban_van Trail - Reconstruct parkway for trail from Sapphire to Archibald. Banyan is d~vP. loped with a variety
of conditions, including front-on homes and some sireW-hes of dirt traiL The Banyan Trail is an impartant esst-
west trail through the heart of Alta Lome, which also forms the southerly hour-4:,ry of the F. questrlan-Rural Area
(east of Sapphire). The length of this trail will dictate a multi-year phased pm~t Emphasis should be placed on .....
providing a usable trail path where none pn~enfly exists.
7. Tum_uoise Trail - Acquire right-of-~,,ay and construct a Wail from Banyan to Almond. This section of trail is
part of the Prirtm'y Loop Trail sysiuxh This section bel~ins at BanYan as Part °f the n'~i°nal trail that f°ll°ws the
east side of CucamonSa Cst, ek Channel to the base of the debris basin (approximately at the level o f lennet). From
this point on, the trail runs through Fivate trail easements within Tram 9540 and 11893 (public access rights
needed) and through a 20 foot wide Flood Control Clxannel easement until it metes with the power line easement
~ - Acquire right-of-way and construct trail within parkway on east side of street. This section
of Carnelian from Hillside to Almond is presently not developed to its full width and is characterized by lar~er
land holclinl~s with homes fronting onto the street.
~. Ameth_vst Trail - Acquire right-of-way and construct trail from Banyan to Ahnond. A difficult section of trail
because it crosses the front yards of many homes, particularly between WiLson and Hillside. Sections of the trail
exist in some form south of Wilson. Trail will follow east side of Amethyst from Banyan to Hillside, where it
crosses over to the west side. Most of the right-of-way exists south of Hillside.
10. Archibald Trail - Construct trail f~om Wilson to Canari. Right-of-wayexists on the east side; however, right-
of-way acquisition needed where trail crosses ovln' to the west side between Fillhide and ~ Ring Lane.
11. Hermosa Trail - A lower priority trail because a trail exists for much of this stretch from Banyan to Almond.
or is being installed quickly as the area develops.
12. Haven Trail - Like Hermosa, this section of trail is being installed as development occurs. Renovation work
would include trail surfacing, fencing, and landscaping.
"' 8.6 REGIONAL HIKING & RIDING TRAIL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
It is important to note that the Regional Trail system ~ould be vastly improved on a short term basis with minor
improvement, such as modifying existing gated entrances and landscaping to allow trail user access. Ultimate
undhuossings to be installed below Banyan will be used by bicyclists and may be funded out of bicycle trail
funds. Priority should be given to completing the undercrossings on one side of the channels before insealllng
the extra undenn-ossings on the other side of channels north of Banyan (opposite from bicycle trail).
· in - n - The next step in implementing the Regional Hiking and Riding Trail system is to
negotiate joint-use agreements with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for Deer ~ Hm~ide
Channel, Day Creek, Almond Intercept Channel and the remaining portion of Cucamonga Creek (south of Base
Line Road). The City has already beb, un disozssione with the District regarding a "Master" Agreement.
2. Demens C.~ek - Minor impmvernents are nece~_~ "7 a t street crossings to [provide trail access, such as clearing
of vegetation, texmrized street pavement crossing, and trail sip to alert motorists at crossings. Relocate chain
link fence around south and east sides of basin to provide a trail connection on top of basin levee over to Amethyst
~- Minor impro~,e,~ents are necessaty from Confluence Park north to Jennet, induding fence
~el~ca~i~n, and ve~etati~n rem~raL N~rth ~f Banyan, the chain link fence needs to be m~ved 2~ feet to the west
to provide Regional Trail paralleling a private local feeder traafl~ A 20 foot wide Community parkway trail on the
west side of Turquoise, from Pearl Slxt"et north to Almond Intercept Channel, would provide an importantlink
between the Cucamonga Oeek Regional Trail and the Almond Intercept Channel 1L-~ional Trail.
4. Deer Creek - Modi fica tion to existing improvements at street crossIngs ee needed to open up trail access. Trail
signs, such as those used along Demes Creek, should be installed. Openings must be provided through chain
link barricade that blocks north-south Uavel along the channel at the two existing pedesU'ian bridges (one north
and one south of Base Line Road).
5. Day Creek - Upon completion of the channel, a traHic signal and grade crossing are needed at Anew Route.
A special at-Srade cwssi ng is needed at the A.T. & S .F. rail line. For additional comments see "Deer Creek" above.
6. Hillside Channel - Install trail signs and modify existing fences and gates to provide trail access.
7. Front Line - Trail access fights must be neptiated with ulility companies and many private property owners.
Due to this U'alls' location In the scenic foothills, the trail shoid be left as natural as possibie. The trail follows fire
road and utility service roads, except where it veen southwee along the Almond Intercept Channel.
8.7 BICYCLE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
On -street bicycle lanes (C~q~ H) are usually provided when streets ax~ construded, or reconstructed, or the
pa~,e~mt is ovedayed. Thus, it is the si~eet construction schedule that typically dictates a bicycle lane's
implementation. Designated bike routes ((~,~.~ ED are ,~dly implemented since pla~r.,,~ent of signs is all that is
required. Implementation of ~ facilities can De done a~ sugh time as the need becomes apparent.
Separated bike paths (~,v~ D are sometiroes constructed as development occurs, such as within the phuned.
communities. Most bike paths are located along flood control channels and utilize the existing or future asphalt
service roads. Therefore, implementation is simply a ma~ter of negotiating ag~.-ements with other public agencies
and private utilities. However, for the flood control channels to properly func~on as a ~ional Wail fadlity for
bicyclists, it will be neces____~2y to construct underp~s_~e~___ at street cwssinl;s. For example, steer underpasses were
bu~talengtheCucam~n~aCreekChanne~Regi~nalTrai~atthe19thS~2~eetandBaseLineR~ademssIngs. Because
._~__E 41
'~ .......................:ii:~:::=::~i: ......""'~' ........"' ..........."~"~"~:'~':""'*" ..................::""ure 2:
r-. """""" ~' " HIKING & RIDING
t ..: ::,,:iTRAILS MASTER
LEGEND
Existing Street Undercrossing
! ! ] ! CITY OF .AHC.O CUCAMOHGA