HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/05/02 - Agenda Packet City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
L"' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
~ CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
May 2, 2001
A.qency, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander ....................Mayor
Diane Williams ...............Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ..............................Member
Grace Curatalo ........................Member
Bob Dutton ..............................Member
Jack Lam .........................City Manager
James L. Markman .............City Attorney
Debra J. Adams .....................City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:00 p.m. Special Closed Session ......................Tapia Conference Room
6:00 p.m. Special City Council Meeting .....................Council Chambers
7:00 p.m. Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ......Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ......................Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
May 2, 2001
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander , Biane
Curatalo, , Dutton , and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a Proclamation of Business Appreciation Week - May
14-18, 2001.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: April 4, 2001
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/11/01, 4/18/01, 4/19/01 and 1
4/24/01 and Payroll ending 4/8/01 for the total amount of
$2,098,544.60.
3. Approval to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the installation of 25
Fiber Optic Cabling at various locations, to be funded from Account No.
1712001-5603, Fiber Optic Cabling Project.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-097 27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING
BIDS" FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER
OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN
SAID CITY AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
.~~ City Council Agenda
May 2, 2001
4. Approval and authorization to execute an agreement (CO01-032) for 32
Encroachment into City Easement or Right-of-Way between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and William and Hilda Hordyk.
5. Approval of a Common Use Agreement between the City of Rancho 33
Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (CO
01-033) for the Hermosa Avenue Improvements adjacent to the Deer
Creek Flood Channel.
RESOLUTION NO. 01~098 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMON
USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND
THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT
6. Approval of Automated Addendum to Refuse Franchise Agreement (CO 35-1
85-082).
7. Approval to accept Construction, release the Retention, and file a 36
Notice of Completion for the Construction of the Corporate Yard, Phase
II, Warehouse.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-099 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORPORATE
YARD, PHASE II, WAREHOUSE,
AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF THE
RETENTION AND FILING A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
8. Approval to adopt a Resolution in Support of an Application for Senior 38
Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B Grand Funds for
Senior Services that Promote Socialization.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-100 39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR SENIOR SUPPORTIVE
SERVICES OLDER AMERICAN ACT TITLE Ill-
B GRANT FUNDS FOR SENIOR SERVICES
THAT PROMOTE SOCIALIZATION
City Council Agenda
May 2, 2001
3
E,~. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion.. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 41
BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-
2002 AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2000-2004 CONSOLIDATED
PLAN - A review of the federally required Consolidated Plan Annual
Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2001-2002, including the final selection or
projects for the CDBG annual application, based on a new grant
allocation of $1,001,000, and a proposed amendment to the 2000-2004
Consolidated Plan to address a proposed new senior center facility and
to revise the loan and grant amounts of the Home Improvement
Program.
2. ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND 134
SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 - FAIRFIELD
APARTMENTS - A request to amend Planning Area 6 of the Subarea
18 Specific Plan to allow multiple family residential development at a
density range of 24 to 30 dwelling units per acre, located on the north
t
side of 4 h Street, west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 210-082-46.
ORDINANCE NO. 656 (first reading) 210
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUBAREA 18
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 TO
AMEND PLANNING AREA VI TO ALLOW
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT A DENSITY RANGE OF 24
TO 30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SiDE OF 4TM
STREET, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 210-082-46
City Council Agenda
May 2, 2001
3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15174 - 213
KB HOME - The proposed subdivision of 33.13 acres of land into 181
tots for single-family homes and 4-lettered lots for trail and landscaping
purposes, in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per
acre) and Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) at
an actual project density of 5.46 dwelling units per acre, located at the
southwest corner of Church Street and Rochester Avenue-APN: 227-
151-52. Staff has a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-101 249
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE
TRACT SUBTT15174, A RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION OF 181 LOTS ON 33.13 ACRES
OF LAND AND 4 LOTS FOR TRAIL AND OPEN
SPACE PURPOSES IN THE LOW-MEDIUM (4-
8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND
MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, WITH
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, BOUNDED
BY ROCHESTER AVENUE, CHURCH STREET
AND MALAGA DRIVE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
227-151-52
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H._:. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
May 2, 2001
5
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 260
SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO FILL VACANCY
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on April 26 2001, seventy two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
April 4, 2001
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Re.qular Meetinq
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 4, 2001 in the
Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Bob Dutton, Diane W111iams and Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple,
Administrative Services Director; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Michael Toy, Information
Systems Specialist; Brad Buller, City Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer;
Betty Miller, Associate Engineer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon,
Management Analyst III; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga
Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Alicia Rodriguez,
Emergency Services Coordinator; Kelly Larson, Emergency Preparedness Specialist; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation celebrating "National Library Week," April 1-7, 2001.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Deborah Clark, Library Director.
Deborah Clark, Library Director, talked about the number of patrons visiting the Library for the month of
March stating they have broken previously set records. She stated they are calling April National Library
Month.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the month of April as "Earthquake Preparedness Month."
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Alicia Rodriguez, Emergency Services Coordinator, and
Kelly Larson, Emergency Preparedness Specialist.
Kelly Larson, Emergency Preparedness Specialist, talked about the City's CERT program. She stated
the next classes will be held in May.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. John Lyons, Etiwanda, felt the Curatalo funeral was first class. He congratulated Bob Dutton on
running for Assembly and wanted to be the first person to endorse him. He stated he did not feel
Dennis Stout was getting a fair shake in the press. He felt Mr. Stout was a hero. He continued to talk
about Jim Curatalo and the wonderful person that he was.
City Council Minutes
April 4, 2001
Page 2
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/15/01, 3/22/01 and 3/28/01 and Payrofi ending 3/15/01, for'
the total amount of $2,571,340.20.
D2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Red Hill Storage Building
and Storage Shed and the Heritage Park Storage Shed.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-070
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS FOR THE RED HILL
STORAGE BUILDING AND STORAGE SHED AND THE HERITAGE
PARK STORAGE SHED
D3. Approval to declare Surplus City-Owned Miscellaneous Equipment and Vehicles.
D4. Approval of a Request from the Rancho Cucamonga VFW and Boy Scout Troop 641 for a Waiver
of Red Hill Amphitheatre and Sound Monitoring Fees for a FIag Retiring Ceremony to be held on Friday,
June 15, 2001.
D5. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc. (CO 01-024) for
preparation of plans and specifications for the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center Landscape and
Irrigation Renovation Project, in the amount of $14,800 (plus 15% contingency) to be funded from
Account No. 1120-305-5300.
D6. Approval to accept bids received, except those submitted by L.A. Signal, Inc. and Dynalectric as
non-responsive to the needs of the City, and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $92,114.00 ($83,740.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, DBX, Inc., (CO
01-025) for the construction of the traffic signal and safety lighting at Rochester Avenue and Lark Drive,
to be funded from Transportation Fee Funds, Account No. 11243035650/1254124-0.
D7. Approval to summaril vacate excess portions of various streets (V-178) - Center Avenue between
Humboldt Avenue and 24t~ Street, 25th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Deer Creek Channel, 25th
Street between Center Avenue and Marine Avenue and 25th Street between Deer Creek Channel and
Center Avenue - requested by Northtown Housing Development Corporation - APN: 209-101-18, 209-
101-23, 209-101-24, 209-103-06, 209-104-06, 209-104-34, 209-104-35, 209-112-17, and 209-121-22. -
Related File DR 00-53.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-071
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARILY
VACATION (V-178) OF A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN
HUMBOLDT AVENUE AND 24TM STREET; 25TM STREET BETWEEN
HERMOSA AVENUE AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL; 25TM STREET
BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND MARINE AVENUE AND 25TM
STREET BETWEEN DEER CREEK CHANNEL AND CENTER AVENUE
(APN: 209-101-18, 209-101-23, 209-101-24, 209-103-06, 209-104-06,
209-104-34, 209-104-35, 209-112-17, and 209-121-22. - RELATED FILE:
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-53
City Council Minutes
April 4, 2001
Page 3
D8. Approval of Summary Vacation of Vehicular Access Rights for two driveways on the north side of
Arrow Route east of Milliken Avenue along Parcel 13 of Parcel Map 15295 (V-179) requested by
Catellus Development (APN 229-011-32). Related file: DR 00-28.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-072
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR TWO DRIVEWAYS
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE EAST OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE ALONG PARCEL 13 OF PARCEL MAP 15295 (V-179) (APN:
229-011-32)
D9. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Local Street Pavement
Rehabilitation - slurry seal of various streets, to be funded from Account No. 11763035650/1022176-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-073
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D10. Approval of appropriation of funds in the amount of $137,500 ($125,000 plus 10% contingency)
and approve the authorization to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for renovation of the Epicenter
Stadium Field to be funded from fund 1700201-5302.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-074
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR RENOVATION OF THE EPICENTER STADIUM
FIELD AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
Dll. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Renovation of two soccer
fields at Red Hill Community Park in the amount of $165,000 from Fund 1120305-5650/1244-120-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-075
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR RENOVATION OF TWO SOCCER FIELDS AT
RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willlares to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
report contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
April 4, 2001
Page 4
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-04 - AMERICAN
BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to establish a Development Agreement for the development
project known as the Victoria Arbors on approximately 300.64 acres of land in the Mixed Use District of
the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to
the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west. APN: 227-201-04, 13
through 18, 22, 28 through 31, 33, and 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20,
22, 23, and 25; and 227-211.40.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 655.
ORDINANCE NO. 655 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA TO ENTER INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-
04, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VICTORIA ARBORS ON
APPROXIMATELY 300.64 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE
DISTRICT OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN, GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY BASE LINE ROAD TO THE NORTH, ETIWANDA
AVENUE TO THE EAST, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH,
AND DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO THE WEST AS PROVIDED FOR IN
SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR
REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 227-210-04, 13 THROUGH 18, 22, 28
THROUGH 31, 33, AND 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, AND 38; 227-
171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, AND 25; AND 227-211-40.
MOTION: Moved by Williams. seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 655.
Motion carried 3-0-0-1 (Dutton abstained).
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. APPROVAL OF AMENDED MAP, SUMMARY VACATION OF PLATEAU DRIVE, RAINTREE
PLACE, REDWOOD DRIVE, STRAWBERRY PLACE, WINDY GROVE DRIVE, SIDEWALK AND
LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS AND STORM DRAIN EASEMENT, DISPOSITION BY QUITCLAIM OF
LOT A AND THE DEANNEXATION OF WORK PROGRAM AREAS FROM LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8
FOR TRACT MAP 15911, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE NORTH OF BASE LINE
ROAD, SUBMITTED BY APHRC 78, LLC
Staff report presented by Betty Miller, Associate Engineer.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-076
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDED TRACT MAP
NUMBER 15911
City Council Minutes
April 4, 2001
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 01-077
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREET, HIGHWAY AND
RELATED PURPOSES FOR PLATEAU DRIVE, RAINTREE PLACE,
REDWOOD DRIVE, STRAWBERRY PLACE, AND WINDY GROVE
DRIVE, WITHIN TRACT 15911, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
EAST AVENUE NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD
RESOLUTION NO. 01-078
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES
WITHIN TRACT 15911, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST
AVENUE NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD
RESOLUTION NO. 01-079
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE
PURPOSES, WITHIN TRACT 15911, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
EAST AVENUE NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD
RESOLUTION NO. 01-080
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE
SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN THE QUITCLAIM
DEED AND TO PRESENT SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE
FILED FOR RECORD
RESOLUTION NO. 01-081
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DEANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM THE WORK PROGRAM FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR AMENDED
TRACT MAP NUMBER 15911
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 01-076, 01-077, 01-078,
01-079, 01-080 and 01-081. Motion carried unanimously 4-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items submitted.
City Council Minutes
April 4, 2001
Page 6
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No items submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
No items submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. The
meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKRHG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166769 002320 99 CENTS ONLY STORES 110 04/11/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00166770 004635 A/~gD K PROTOORAPNY 04/11/01 8.99 MW OH
AP00166771 002307 A B C NETWORKS INC 04/11/01 110.00 MW OH
AP00166772 002303 A M I MEDICAL BILLING SERVICE 04/11/01 5.40 MW OH
AP00166773 021922 A1 CLE/~NERS 04/11/01 8.49 MW OH
AP00166774 000001 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 04/11/01 84.10 MW OH
AP00166775 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 04/11/01 56.13 MW OH
AP00166776 001334 AB~j~C 04/11/01 294.06 MW OH
AP00166777 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 04/11/01 1,088.00 MW OH
AP00166778 005509 AIR CON~fROLLED ENVIRONMENTM 04/11/01 551.27 MW OH
AP0016~779 000498 ALE~LB2gDER, WILLI~34 J 04/11/01 38.00 MW OH
AP00166780 005650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC 04/11/01 5,550.00 MW OE
AP00166781 002305 AN AFFAIR OF THE EE/~RT 04/11/01 40.26 MW OH
AP00166782 002324 ANGEL JEWELERS 04/11/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00166783 002323 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH INC 04/11/01 36.00 MW OH
AP00166784 002321 ARLON INC 04/11/01 22.68 MW OE
AP00166785 002170 ARVELO Fj~REN 04/11/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00168786 002437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 04/11/01 10.32 MW OH
AP00166787 006115 AUFBAU CORPORATION 04/11/01 18,532.50 MW OH
AP00166788 002322 ALFfO CELLLrLAR II 04/11/01 45.81 MW OH
AP00166789 002310 BAKER CNC MACHINING INC 04/11/01 46.63 MW OH
AP00166790 001040 B;UKER, DUANE 04/11/01 225.00 MW OH
AP00166791 021862 BC CAFE 04/11/01 182.75 MW OH
AP00166792 002308 BEAUMONT CONCRETE COMP/~NY 04/11/01 14.72 MW OH
AP00166793 002325 BERKLINE CORP, THE 04/11/01 25.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---j ob: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166794 002337 BERLINER, ROEBIN P 04/11/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00166795 004441 BEST BUY CO INC 04/11/01 89.20 MW OH
AP00166796 001247 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 04/11/01 54.23 MW OH
AP00166797 002227 BLIND FELLOWS 04/11/01 425.70 MW OH
AP00166798 001746 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 04/11/01 154.80 MW OH
AP00166799 002169 BRANT]M CYNTHIA 04/11/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00166800 005859 BRE~FN/Uq, CHERYL 04/11/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00166801 002332 BRODY, WENDY 04/11/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00166802 021911 BLFLLDOG SHEET METAL ~ ROOFI 04/11/01 51.56 MW OH
AP00166803 000576 BLFLLER, BRAD 04/11/01 508.50 MW OH
AP00166804 005959 BUSINESS WEEK 04/11/01 39.95 MW OH
AP00166805 002318 C ~ D BUSINESS SYSTEM 04/11/01 52.13 MW OH
AP00166806 000062 CkLIFORNIA JOURNAL 04/11/01 39.95 MW OH
AP00166807 004803 CAPPO INC 04/11/01 90.00 MW OH
AP00166808 002334 CARDIN, RON 04/11/01 192.00 MW OH
AP00166809 002314 C~RUSOS CONSTRUCTION COMP~/~Y 04/11/01 87.08 MW OH
AP00166810 002313 CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORAT 04/11/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00166811 003001 CENTEX HOMES 04/11/01 145.00 MW OH
AP00166812 000068 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 04/11/01 165.89 MW OH
AP00166813 002326 CHAFFEY DENTISTRY 04/11/01 285.82 MW OH
AP00166814 001061 CHAMPION AWARDS AN~D SPECI~J~IE 04/11/01 102.13 MW OH
AP00166815 006052 CF~ARTER COb~UNICATIONS 04/11/01 44.52 MW OH
AP00166816 002317 CHINA HUT 04/11/01 15.00 MW OH
AP00166817 001337 CIESLIK, DANIEL 04/11/01 180.00 MW OH
AP00166818 002330 CITATION PRECISION 04/11/01 21.44 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---j ob: 32252 #S043 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check/~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166819 002319 CLARION CONSTRUCTION INC 04/11/01 47.06 MW OH
AP00166820 004211 COAST RECRE/~TION INC 04/11/01 409.10 MW OH
AP00166821 001328 CONCANNON, SEARI 04/11/01 149.50 MW OH
AP00166822 002338 CORTEZ, CARMEN 04/11/01 112.00 MW OH
AP00166823 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 04/11/01 318.50 MW OH
AP00166824 001064 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 04/11/01 167.27 MW OE
AP00166825 001979 CRUZ, SUSAN 04/11/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00166826 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 04/11/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00166827 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIET 04/11/01 11,780.53 MW OH
AP00166828 002333 CUITINO, KELLIE 04/11/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00166829 000604 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 04/11/01 3,550.00 MW OH
AP00166830 001574 DAM, JAYNE 04/11/01 56.00 MW OH
AP00166831 004084 D~3~ES ~ MOORE 04/11/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00166832 004545 DATA2 INC 04/11/01 2,702.08 MW OH
AP00166833 001067 DAVID, ROMEO M 04/11/01 3,120.00 MW OH
AP00166834 002342 DBAARCHITECTS INC 04/11/01 22.99 MW OH
AP00166835 002347 DE DOBAY, CONCEPCION 04/11/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00166836 004544 DICK, ERIC 04/11/01 330.00 MW OH
AP00166837 005809 DIETERICH POST COMPA/4Y 04/11/01 448.63 MW OH
AP00166838 002348 DIGITAL MARKETING EERV 04/11/01 10.00 MW OH
AP00166839 005744 DIRECTV 04/11/01 27.99 MW OH
AP00166840 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 04/11/01 2,397.25 MW OH
AP00166841 002350 ELITE MOTOR CARS 04/11/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00166842 005767 ELITE pERSONNEL SERVICES INC 04/11/01 46.50 MW OH
AP00166843 090520 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 04/11/01 2,720.51 MW OR
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK P. EGISTER Page 4
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN}aqCE---jOb: 32252 #5043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166844 000229 EWING IP_RIGATION PRODUCTS 04/11/01 235,41 MW OH
AP00166845 000123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 04/11/01 17.53 MW OH
AP00166846 002351 FERN/~qDEZ, JODI 04/11/01 26.25 MW OH
AP00166847 000155 FILARSKY ~ WATT 04/11/01 977.50 ~q OH
AP00166848 006556 FINESSE PERSONlgEL ASSOCIATES 04/11/01 2,868.30 F~q OH
AP00166849 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 04/11/01 94.60 MW OH
AP00166850 002352 FITZGERALD, KRYSTEE 04/11/01 230.00 ~q OH
AP00166851 006101 FIVE ST~ CATERING SERVICE 04/11/01 34.45 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00166852 041202 FOOTHILL THRIFT STORE 04/11/01 30.78 b~q OH
AP00166853 041199 FOREMOST PACFj~GING 04/11/01 45.99 MW OH
AP00166854 001335 FP_n/gCHISE T/~X BOAPd3 04/11/01 137.23 MW OH
AP00166855 041188 FROSTYS FOREST FARM 04/11/01 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00166856 006074 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 04/11/01 1,455.00 ~FW OH
AP00166857 002353 FLrNERAL PI~UqNING SERVICES 04/11/01 116.19 ~Sq OH
AP00166858 041239 FYFE, RENEE 04/11/01 183.25 ~q OH
AP00166859 000936 G E ENERGY RENTALS 04/11/01 8,285.00 ~Sq OH
AP00166860 006232 G~iD~_BOUT TOURS INC 04/11/01 3,193.00 NF~ OH
AP00166861 004540 G~juE GROUP,THE 04/11/01 689.08 ~q OH
AP00166862 002354 GARCIA, ALICIA 04/11/01 20.00 ~F~ OH
AP00166863 002355 GIVEN PLACE PUBLISHING 04/11/01 17.32 MW OH
AP00166864 002357 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMPA/qY 04/11/01 26.80 MW OH
AP00166865 001990 GONZALEZ, PAULIN 04/11/01 200.00 ~[~ OR AR
AP00166866 002360 GORNBEIN, CAROL 04/11/01 80.00 bSg OH
AP00166867 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 04/11/01 168.19 ~q OH
AP00166868 090713 GREENWOOD'S tFNIFORMS 04/11/01 5,600.00 N~q OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166869 002363 GRELLO, LAURA 04/11/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00166870 004913 GROLIER PUBLISHING CO INC 04/11/01 113.87 MW OH
AP00166871 002364 GROVE DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING 04/11/01 13.66 MW OH
AP00166872 006383 H.V. CARTER CO. 04/11/01 52.08 MW OH
AP00166873 006217 ~IARO ENGINEERING 04/11/01 3,888.00 MW OH
AP00166874 005909 HASTY AWARDS 04/11/01 406.94 MW OH
AP00166875 002267 HAVEN MOBILE 04/11/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00166876 002251 HEGSTROM, DEBRA 04/11/01 88.00 MW OH
AP00166877 001822 HENCHMAN, NATALIE 04/11/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00166878 004845 HILLSIDE COM~R/NITY CHURCH 04/11/01 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00166879 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 04/11/01 765.23 MW OH
AP00166880 002272 HOLLYWOOD VIDEO # 005732 04/11/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00166881 002274 HOME INSTEAD SENIOR CARE 04/11/01 2S.00 MW OH
AP00166882 000161 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 04/11/01 114.69 MW OH
AP00166883 002236 HUITT-ZOLLARS INC 04/11/01 99.85 MW OH
AP00166884 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 04/11/01 304.62 MW OH
AP00166885 004254 IBM CORPORATION 04/11/01 7,520.00 MW OH
AP00166886 002733 ICMA SUBSCRIPTION RENEWALS 04/11/01 139.50 MW OH
AP00166887 004188 ID BURR 04/11/01 43.12 MW OH
AP00166888 001603 INLAND EMPIRE CONSULT/U~TS 04/11/01 5,000.00 MW OH
AP00166889 032103 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 04/11/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00166890 004747 INL~/~D LIBRARY SYSTEM 04/11/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00166891 000122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 04/11/01 1,139.92 MW OH
AP00166892 002315 INLA~4D WHOLESALE NURSERY 04/11/01 770.78 MW OH
AP00166893 006367 ISIS PUBLISHING 04/11/01 6.75 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166894 000175 JOBS AVAILABLE 04/11/01 28.00 MW OH
AP00166895 002238 JOHN J ~ JULIE NALLEY 04/11/01 23.00 MW ON
AP00166896 002252 JOHNSON, SF~NA 04/11/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00166897 006667 K.E.C. ENGINEERING 04/11/01 320,347.80 MW OH
AP00166898 005654 KAPCO 04/11/01 272.77 MW OH
AP00166899 004822 KARATSU, ROBERT 04/11/01 64.97 MW OH
AP00166900 002201 KARCHER ENVIRONMENTAL 04/11/01 800.00 MW OH
AP00166901 003491 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 04/11/01 57.78 MW OH
AP00166902 001657 KETTLE CREEK CORP 04/11/01 13,103.81 MW OH
AP00166903 002277 KIMBALL CONSTRUCTION, R J 04/11/01 5.99 MW OH
AP00166904 006193 KI~MATH BAY 04/11/01 1,512.95 ~ OH
AP00166905 006516 KRUSE, JO~N A 04/11/01 1,120.00 MW OH CC
AP00166906 002259 KWAN, N3~NCY 04/11/01 40.00 ~q OH
AP00166907 000297 L A SIGN~J~ INC 04/11/01 4,066.43 MW OH
AP00166908 005545 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 04/11/01 5,019.31 MW OH
AP00166909 001075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 04/11/01 935.72 MW OH
AP00166910 001664 LAMPE, JARRED 04/11/01 96.00 MW OH CC
AP00166911 002262 LANCASTER, KURT 04/11/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00166912 002280 L~NCON ELECTRIC CORP 04/11/01 97.50 MW OH
AP00166913 000321 LANDSCAPE WEST INC 04/11/01 70,472.50 MW OH
AP00166914 002279 LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS E BELMUD 04/11/01 36.00 MW OH
AP00166915 002278 LAW OFFICE OF SOBEILA AZIZI 04/11/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00166916 002265 LEWAN, LAUREN 04/11/01 24.00 MW OH
AP00166917 004189 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC 04/11/01 334.22 MW OH
AP00166918 000200 LOS ANGELES TIMES 04/11/01 22.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166919 001008 LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. 04/11/01 485.14 MW OH
AP00166920 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 04/11/01 251.00 MW OH
AP00166921 003156 LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC 04/11/01 514.44 ~ OH
AP00166922 002239 LYON HOMES, WILLI~3~ 04/11/01 23.03 bTW OH
AP00166923 001062 M C I WORLDCOM 04/11/01 1,294.04 MW OH
AP00166924 002242 ~GNON ENGINEERING INC 04/11/01 12.63 MW OH
AP00166925 002243 ~L~RCOTT, MICHAEL S 04/11/01 9.00 MW OH
AP00166926 002253 NL~RISCAL, b~DELINE 04/11/01 80.00 ~q OH
AP00166927 006085 MCARDLE, KEVIN 04/11/01 85.34 ~Sq OH
AP00166928 001688 MCGINNIS DONALD 04/11/01 200.00 ~ OH AR
AP00166929 001025 MC~STER CARR SUPPLY COMP~3JY 04/11/01 273.95 ~ OH
AP00166930 006651 MELENEEZ, TONY 04/11/01 550.00 MW OH CC
AP00166931 002240 ME~DOZA, DI/~qA 04/11/01 65.78 BTW OH
AP00166932 005852 MIDWEST TAPE 04/11/01 4,140.23 ~rW OH
AP00166933 004374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 04/11/01 134.92 ~T~ OH
AP00166934 002244 MONTES DIE ~ ENGINEERING IN 04/11/01 6.75 MW OH
AP00166935 000482 MORALES, MICH3~EL 04/11/01 34.40 ~rw OH
AP00166936 001761 MORRIS, ~d~RY 04/11/01 200.00 ~ OH AR
AP00166937 030072 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 04/11/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00166938 030072 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 04/11/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00166939 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARB/LRA WHITE 04/11/01 13.85 MW OH
AP00166940 080082 N~/{RO 04/11/01 70.00 FSq OH
AP00166941 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 04/11/01 905.80 N~q OH
AP00166942 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 04/11/01 23,507.16 ~ OH
AP00166943 001331 NELSON, SUS~aq 04/11/01 473.00 ~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00168944 002245 NEW ENGLA/qD NEWSPAPER SUPPLY 04/11/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00168945 000433 NIXONEGLI EUIPMENT 04/11/01 731.11 MW OH
AP00166948 004853 OCLC INC 04/11/01 32.87 ~5q OH
AP00166947 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 04/11/01 1,417.37 ~F~ OH
AP00166948 005403 OFFICE MAX 04/11/01 38.33 MW OH
AP00166949 001686 OKETOLA, ELIZABETH 04/11/01 27.50 MW OH
AP00166950 002264 OLMEDO, CRYSTAL 04/11/01 64.00 MW OH
AP00166951 000232 OMNITR/~NS 04/11/01 382.50 MW ON
AP00166952 002246 OTIS SpLTNKMEyER INC 04/11/01 72.00 MW
AP00166953 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 04/11/01 5,500.39 MW OH
AP00166954 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP ~ IRRIGATION 04/11/01 73.61 MW OH
AP00166955 002249 P~aDGETT THOMPSON 04/11/01 458.00 MW OH
AP00166956 001469 PEP34A SOUND 04/11/01 2,533.55 MW OR
AP00166957 002266 PERS CHOICE BASIC 04/11/01 567.12 MW OH
AP00166958 001325 PETERS, CHERYL 04/11/01 495.00 MW OH
AP00166959 002281 PETERSON INTERNATIONAL 04/11/01 14.83 MW OH
AP00166960 006148 PIRON, SBAUN 04/11/01 210.00 MW OH CC
AP00166961 000255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 04/11/01 15,343.71 MW OH
AP00166962 005177 PORT SUPPLY 04/11/01 178.37 MW OH
AP00166963 001828 PREIER CONTRACTORS 04/11/01 100,488.71 MW ON
AP00166964 002247 PROFORi~CE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 04/11/01 373.72 MW OH
AP00166965 001323 QUINT~/qA, ZITA 04/11/01 193.00 MW OH
AP00166966 006156 R E R GARAGE DOORS 04/11/01 908.00 MW OR
AP00166967 000345 R D O EQUIPMENT CO POWERPLA/g 04/11/01 160.94 MW OH
AP00166968 000545 RED WING SHOE STOPdE 04/11/01 536.81 ~T~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CBECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166969 001324 REIN~{ARDTSEN, DEBRA 04/11/01 282.50 b~q OH
AP00166970 002365 RETROSPECT, INC 04/11/01 11.00 MW OH
AP00166971 000443 R/~I CONSULTING 04/11/01 1,680.00 ~ OH
AP00166972 002367 RICH/~RD'S FABRICS 04/11/01 17.80 MW OH
AP00166973 005618 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 04/11/01 4,026.28 MW OH
AP00166974 002366 RIPOLY, GI~L~ 04/11/01 44.00 MW OH
AP00166975 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 04/11/01 188.35 MW OH
AP00166976 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 04/11/01 226.00 MW OH
AP00166977 000626 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 04/11/01 50.00 ~Sq OH
AP00166978 004438 S C A C E O 04/11/01 60.00 b~q OH
AP00166979 006770 SAFEWAY SIGN 04/11/01 386.68 ~ OH
AP00166980 005538 S~/q ~qTONIO MATERIAJ~S 04/11/01 928.62 MW OH
AP00166981 001298 S~/q BERN COUNTY ASSESSORS OFF 04/11/01 936.00 ~F~ OH
AP00166982 001590 S~q BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 04/11/01 231.00 ~FW OH
AP00166983 000300 S~ BERlq COUNTY 04/11/01 1,920.00 ~F~ OH
AP00166984 000150 SAi~ BER/q COUNTy 04/11/01 24,702.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00166985 000132 S~/~ DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 04/11/01 574.05 ~q OH
AP00166986 002372 SATELLITE RELAy FOR DIRECT TV 04/11/01 23.00 bSq OH
AP00166987 002373 SAV/~T LIGHTING 04/11/01 22.90 MW OH
AP00166988 002374 SBD SP~34ISH BOOR DISTR INC 04/11/01 49.12 MW OH
AP00166989 004350 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 04/11/01 170.00 ~Sq OH
AP00166990 003896 SENEC}L~L, CAL 04/11/01 387.00 ~F~ OH
AP00166991 005192 SHOOTING SYSTEMS 04/11/01 190.95 MW OH
AP00166992 000351 SIGN SHOP, THE 04/11/01 430.00 MW OH
AP00166993 000692 SIR SPEEDY 04/11/01 195.94 ~FW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--lOC: FINANCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check }~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00166994 000319 SO C}_~IF GAS COMP}~NY 04/11/01 6,537.68 ~Sq OH
AP00166995 001825 SOFT CHOICE CORP 04/11/01 1,556.60 ~Sq OH
AP00166996 000825 SONSATIONAL 04/11/01 5,000.00
AP00166997 012590 SO~LL, JODI 04/11/01 120.82
AP00166998 006343 ST~I~ SELF STO~GE 04/11/01 936.07
AP00166999 003937 STE~ ~ POORS 04/11/01 338.92 ~ OH
AP00167000 004176 STATE BOA~ OF EQUALI~TION 04/11/01 317.14
AP00167001 004176 STATE BOA~ OF EQUALI~TION 04/11/01 1,426.00 ~ OH
AP00167002 003597 STATE OF C~IFO~IA 04/11/01 38,500.00
AP00167003 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FO~A 04/11/01 708.33 ~ OH
AP00167004 012127 STEWART, P~ 04/11/01 59.18 ~ OH
AP00167005 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 04/11/01 25.00 ~ OH
AP00167006 002368 SUPERIOR ~SONRY INC 04/11/01 149.40 ~ OH
AP00167007 004445 T E G ROOFING 04/11/01 1,200.00 ~ OH
AP00167008 002378 T B E~ERPRISES 04/11/01 7.32 ~ OH
AP00167009 002381 T L C STAFFING 04/11/01 20.00 ~ OH
AP00167010 002344 TARGET 04/11/01 46.10 ~ OH
AP00167011 002234 TCM LLC 04/11/01 13,800.00 ~ OH
AP00167012 006159 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONS~TIN 04/11/01 5,400.00 ~ OH
AP00167013 005980 TEN SPEED PRESS 04/11/01 50.20 ~ OH
AP00167014 002383 TI~ERWOLF 04/11/01 30.00 ~ OH
AP00167015 012134 TOMS CARPET CL~ING 04/11/01 12.60 ~ OH
AP00167016 012567 TRE~ 2100 STAFF 04/11/01 182.50 ~ OH
AP00167017 003388 TRUGREEN ~CARE ~GIONAL 04/11/01 3,565.00 ~ OH
AP00167018 002190 TRUXIGN 04/11/01 810.60 ~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 32253 ~S043 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167019 012508 TUR/g KEY ELECTRIC INC 04/11/01 81.21 MW OH
AP00167020 002737 U C REGENTS 04/11/01 130.00 MW OH
AP00167021 004788 LggDERGROLr~TD SVC ALERT OF SO C 04/11/01 258.75 MW OH
AP00167022 003912 UNIQUE CREATIONS 04/11/01 1,835.48 MW OH
AP00167023 004206 UNIQUE CREATIONS 04/11/01 103.20 MW OH
AP00167024 006707 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 04/11/01 2,307.28 MW OH
AP00167025 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 04/11/01 46.73 MW OH
AP00167026 002384 UNITED TILE COMP;dqY 04/11/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00167027 000919 UNITED WAY 04/11/01 627.32 MW OH
AP00167028 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 04/11/01 2,969.99 MW OH
AP00167029 000358 VEND U VENDING 04/11/01 72.91 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167030 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 04/11/01 2,434.74 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167031 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 04/11/01 223.30 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167032 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/11/01 35.25 MW OH
AP00167033 003721 VILLAGE NURSERIES 04/11/01 4,961.72 MW OH
AP00167034 005870 VL SYSTEMS 04/11/01 2,625.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167035 001329 VOLM, LISA 04/11/01 112.50 MW OH
AP00167036 002387 WASHINGTON FIRST FIN/~NCIAL 04/11/01 76.50 MW OH
AP00167037 012138 WATER STORE 04/11/01 10.80 MW OH
AP00167038 000213 WI~XIE 04/11/01 162.93 MW OH
AP00167039 002388 WAYNE'S ~ALLMARK SHOP 04/11/01 7.50 MW OH
AP00167040 005526 WEST GROUP 04/11/01 295.10 MW OH
AP00167041 002390 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE 04/11/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00167042 000212 WILLD/Uq ASSOCIATES 04/11/01 12,849.00 MW OH
Ap00167043 002389 WYTCHERLEY, LISA 04/11/01 24.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/11/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 12
WED, APR 11, 2001, 3:12 PM ~-req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 32252 #S043 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CREEG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167044 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 04/11/01 248.46 MW OH
AP00167045 001297 YORK BRONZE COMP3LMY 04/11/01 594.24 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 1
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 841,282.49 Number of Checks Processed: 276
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 841,282.49
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~anount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167213 002019 3 D CARPET ~ DP, APERIES 04/18/01 1,039.00 ~q OH
AP00167214 005023 3M COMP/~KTY 04/18/01 2,449.03 ~q OH
AP00167215 004635 AAND K PHOTOGRApHy 04/18/01 51.00 ~ OH
AP00167216 002732 ABe LOCKSMITHS 04/18/01 715.64 Ff~ OH
AP00167217 006011 AEC SCHOOL SUPPLy INC 04/18/01 40.31 F~q OH
AP00167218 004347 ACCUPj~TE SMOG AUTO E TRUCK 04/18/01 409.84 MW OH
AP00167219 002438 ~D~24S, CORINIqE 04/18/01 33.00
AP00167220 006309 AD/~4SON, RONALD 04/18/01 2,496.00 ~Sq OH
AP00167221 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSb'LTING INC 04/18/01 13,814.54 MW OH
AP00167222 002644 ALPERTS PRINTING 04/18/01 273.88 ~q OH
AP00167223 002283 ~3~S PI~AN'NING RESEARCH CORP 04/18/01 7,371.56 ~rW OH
AP00167224 001823 ARCH WIRELESS 04/18/01 269.45 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167225 002341 ARCEIB~J~D FLOWERS 04/18/01 139.00 ~Sq OH
AP00167226 005807 ARCHITERP3~ DESIGN GROUP 04/18/01 2,315.50 ~Sq OH
AP00167227 004782 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 04/18/01 1,520.00 MW
AP00167228 001790 ASH ~3SIC STORES, S~3~ 04/18/01 2,619.95 ~q OH
AP00167229 002437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 04/18/01 1,707.50 MW OH
AP00167230 000962 AT A/qD T 04/18/01 13.31 ~5q OH
AP00167231 006747 B E R AUTO SERVICE 04/18/01 373.30 MW OH
AP00167232 002436 B~/~BA, ESTELA 04/18/01 40.00 ~ OH
AP00167233 002449 B~a~RATT ~av~ERIC~/q INC 04/18/01 210.02 ~Sq OH
AP00167234 002425 EASF CORPORATION 04/18/01 42.25
AP00167235 006142 BASSETT SMITH, TERRI 04/18/01 179.19 b~q OH
AP00167236 004407 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 04/18/01 90.00 ~Kq OH
AP00167237 006527 BEYON~D.COM 04/18/01 270.01 ~q OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check }~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167238 001247 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 04/18/01 167.54 MW OH
AP00167239 001746 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 04/18/01 3,650.49 MW OH
AP00167240 005341 BUCKNAMAND ASSOCIATES 04/18/01 1,932.00 MW OH
AP00167241 002434 CABPEP, A, YANA 04/18/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00167242 005369 CAL COVER PRODUCTS 04/18/01 125.00 ~Sq OH
AP00167243 006394 CALIFOR/qIA PLASTICARD INC 04/18/01 7,199.46 ~Sq OH
AP00167244 000210 CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION FOUND 04/18/01 100.00 NSq OH
AP00167245 002429 CARMIChAEL, TA/~YA 04/18/01 45.00 ~q OH
AP00167246 002427 CASTRO, NLARIA 04/18/01 51.00 MW OH
AP00167247 005207 CAVENDISH CORP, MARSHALL 04/18/01 101.95 MW OH
AP00167248 002447 CHAPIN, DAVID 04/18/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00167249 000488 CHEVRON USA INC 04/18/01 117.60 MW OH
AP00167250 002433 CIANCIOLO, KAREN 04/18/01 52.60 MW OH
AP00167251 001337 CIESLIK, DANIEL 04/18/01 180.00 MW OH
AP00167252 000073 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 04/18/01 21.88 MW OH
AP00167253 002445 COHEN, SHARON 04/18/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00167254 002442 COHEN, TAMMY 04/18/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00167255 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 04/18/01 33.26 bTW OH
AP00167256 002228 COb~I/NITY B~/~iK 04/18/01 49,819.25 ~ OH
AP00167257 000643 COMPUTERI~AND 04/18/01 17,611.98 MW
AP00167258 006711 CORPORATE PRINTERS 04/18/01 2,388.22 F~q OH
AP00167259 005802 CP ~2qD DR 04/18/01 239.00 ~q OH
AP00167260 001064 CREATIVE W~OLESALE 04/18/01 164.80 bTW OH
AP00167261 002456 CSUSB 04/18/01 139.00 MW OH
AP00167262 VOID.CONTINUVoid - Continued Stub 04/18/01 0.00 VM OH Void
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l,37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167263 000085 CUC~24ONGA CO WATER DIST 04/18/01 7,395.21 MW OH
AP00167264 002430 CYCHNER, DAWN 04/18/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00167265 000239 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 04/18/01 6,901.63 MW OH
AP00167266 000106 DAN GUERRA A~TD ASSOCIATES 04/18/01 71,705.50 ~Sq OH
AP00167267 006302 DE/~N INC,STU~a~T 04/18/01 350.00 MW OH
AP00167268 001290 DEER CREEK CAR C~RE CENTER 04/18/01 42.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167269 004634 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORA 04/18/01 176.51 MW OH
AP00167270 002463 DRYDEN, MICHELLE 04/18/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00167271 002464 DURALL, KAREN 04/18/01 96.00 MW OH
AP00167272 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 04/18/01 441.61 MW OH
AP00167273 003806 ETIW}a~DA SCHOOL DISTRICT 04/18/01 385.00 MW OH
AP00167274 000229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 04/18/01 198.74 MW OH
AP00167275 005917 FASTEN~L COMPANY 04/18/01 14.10 MW OH
AP00167276 002465 FERGUSON, MARQUETTA 04/18/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00167277 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 04/18/01 1,945.00 MW OH
AP00167278 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 04/18/01 1,147.34 MW OH
AP00167279 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 04/18/01 268.77 MW OH
AP00167280 004762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 04/18/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00167281 002840 FORD OF UPLAND INC 04/18/01 163.11 MW OH
AP00167282 002481 GENTRY, DAWN 04/18/01 48.00 MW OH
AP00167283 001319 GRAHAM RESEARCH CONSULTANTS 04/18/01 5,000.00 MW OH
AP00167284 002466 GREEN, TISRA 04/18/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00167285 006383 H.V. CARTER CO. 04/18/01 46.57 ~W OH
AP00167286 001681 HALL SHAKENIA 04/18/01 200.00 MW OH AR
AP00167287 002233 HALSTEj~D ED 04/18/01 250.00 MW OH AR
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, AFR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: COONZALE--leg: GL JL--loci FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~j~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167288 005699 H3~R2~BOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 04/18/01 149.51 F~q OH
AP00167289 002418 H3~RRIS, ALVIN 04/18/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00167290 002413 HERDFL~N, KRISTIN 04/18/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00167291 002451 EKC EXCAVATION INC 04/18/01 1,000,00 MW OH
AP00167292 000158 EOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 04/18/01 1,916.29 MW OH
AP00167293 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 04/18/01 448.02 MW OH
AP00167294 000167 ICBO CITRUS BELT CHAPTER 04/18/01 201.00 MW OH
AP00167295 001218 INDUETRI~L DISTRIBUTION GROUP 04/18/01 98,08 MW OB
AP00167296 005682 INLAND INDUSTRI~J~ MEDICAL GRO 04/18/01 206.75 MW OH
AP00167297 000908 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 04/18/01 1,677.52 MW OH
AP00167298 000122 INT_~ND VALLEY DAILY Bb'LLETIN 04/18/01 3,268.65 MW OH
AP00167299 003452 INTRAVAIA ROCK3~D SAND 04/18/01 56.00 MW OH
AP00167300 002453 J'S PIPELIN~E 04/18/01 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00167301 032043 J/~qECK, LINDA 04/18/01 8.12 MW OH
AP00167302 005283 JONES ~ MAYER, LAW OFFICES 04/18/01 1,250.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167303 002409 JON~S, LORRIE 04/18/01 48.00 MW OH
AP00167304 001716 K B HOMES 04/18/01 4,500.00 MW OH
AP00167305 002450 KEENER, CERIS 04/18/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00167306 004982 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 04/18/01 9,129.10 MW OH
AP00167307 006516 KRUSE, JOAN A 04/18/01 1,140.00 ~q OH CC
AP00167308 002479 LA QUINTA INNS 04/18/01 453,19 MW OH
AP00167309 000088 LA VOZ 04/18/01 384.00 MW OH
AP00167310 001075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 04/18/01 314.05 MW OH
AP00167311 000193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 04/18/01 918.23 MW OH
AP00167312 003338 I~KESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 04/18/01 445.33 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER page 5
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CC~DNZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FI~L~NCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~mount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167313 001664 LAMPE, J/~RRED 04/18/01 128.00 MW OR CC
AP00167314 002408 LEE E WATTS INC 04/18/01 83.70 MW OH
AP00167315 000445 LEGACY 04/18/01 1,280.00 MW OR
AP00167316 002177 LEON, MARIE ELAIE~TE 04/18/01 500.00 MW OR AR
AP00167317 000979 LEWIS OPERATING CORP 04/18/01 500.00 MW ON
AP00167318 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 04/18/01 8,249.90 MW OR
AP00167319 002048 LITTLE TIKES CO~e4ERCIAL PLAY 04/18/01 682.92 MW OR
AP00167320 005662 LOS/~NGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 04/18/01 239.25 MW OH
AP00167321 002407 LUCIO, MARY/~E 04/18/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00167322 001062 M C I WORLDCOM 04/18/01 28.37 MW OR
AP00167323 001062 M C I WORLDCOM 04/18/01 8.43 MW OH
AP00167324 006143 Mi~RINO, JOEN 04/18/01 45.25 MW ON
AP00167325 002415 MARIN, SPLANNON 04/18/01 50.00 MW ON
AP00167326 000072 MARK CRRIS INC 04/18/01 178.65 MW OR
AP00167327 000250 MARTINEZ TOWING AND AUTOMOTIV 04/18/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00167328 031878 MASTERCRAFT 04/18/01 301.18 MW OH
AP00167329 003871 MATT'S ~RDWARE 04/18/01 5.10 M]q OR
AP00167330 032097 MAURy, TERI 04/18/01 52.50 MW OR
Ap00167331 002401 MCCANN, CRRISTINE 04/18/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00167332 002416 MEIJER, CORINNE 04/18/01 15.00 MW OR
AP00167333 002198 MICHAELS STORES INC 3019 04/18/01 490.72 MW OR
AP00167334 002411 MINGUS, CATHI 04/18/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00167335 002016 MITY LITE 04/18/01 6,954.89 MW OR
AP00167336 002454 MORALES, TREVOR 04/18/01 392.50 MW OH
Ap00167337 002405 MOYA, JOY 04/18/01 52.50 MW OR
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167338 032171 MOYNIHAN, ANGELA 04/18/01 33.00 MW OH
AP00167339 002400 MURRAy, JFa%N'NE 04/18/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00167340 002286 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL 04/18/01 2,645.00 MW OH
AP00167341 002404 NAVARO III, RAMON 04/18/01 32.00 MW OH
AP00167342 003600 NIELSEN, NETTIE 04/18/01 2.75 MW OH
AP00167343 002431 O'NEIL, JOE 04/18/01 456.41 MW OH
AP00167344 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 04/18/01 628.01 MW OH
AP00167345 000461 OLDFORD, PATRICIA 04/18/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00167346 005461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 04/18/01 146.88 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167347 001824 ORIENTAL TRADING 04/18/01 97.35 MW OH
AP00167348 002431 ORTIZ, ROSEANN 04/18/01 51.00 MW OH
AP00167349 001441 PACIFIC BELL 04/18/01 5,224.99 ~FW OH
AP00167350 006287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 04/18/01 36,925.02 MW OH
AP00167351 004223 PAPER DIRECT INC 04/18/01 163.79 MW OH
AP00167352 000818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 04/18/01 6.45 MW OH
AP00167353 004499 PARK SPECIALTIES 04/18/01 . 2,700.00 MW OH
AP00167354 006755 PARSONS BRINKEREOFF QUADE AND 04/18/01 32,265.10 MW OH
AP00167355 002423 PEPPERMILL HOTEL CASINO 04/18/01 991.20 MW OH
AP00167356 002420 PETERSON, J~/qN 04/18/01 39.00 MW OH
AP00167357 002419 PICKETT, EDDIE 04/18/01 184.67 MW OH
AP00167358 006148 PIRON, SEAUN 04/18/01 204.00 MW OH CC
AP00167359 000272 PITNEY BOWES 04/18/01 1,377.83 MW OH
AP00167360 002403 POLITES, J~a4IE 04/18/01 72.00 MW OH
AP00167361 003952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHU 04/18/01 553.50 MW OH
AP00167362 001049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 04/18/01 558.16 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER page 7
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167363 000758 pRJ~XAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 04/18/01 56.77 MW OH
AP00167364 006399 PREMIER PERSONNEL 04/18/01 799.20 MW OH CC
AP00167365 000065 PRUDENTIAL OVEPj~LL SUPPLY 04/18/01 15.40 MW OH
AP00167366 000251 R ~ R AUTOMOTIVE 04/18/01 4,673.48 MW OH
AP00167367 002705 R H F INC 04/18/01 55.17 MW OH
AP00167368 002443 RAINEY, LISA 04/18/01 38.00 MW OH
AP00167369 005174 Pj~NCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 04/18/01 500.00 MW OH
AP00167370 004130 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 04/18/01 65.31 MW OH
AP00167371 002444 REDMAN, KARI 04/18/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00167372 011926 REEVES, VICTOR 04/18/01 34.16 MW OH
AP00167373 002446 RENO CITY OF 04/18/01 1,080.00 MW OH
AP00167374 002441 RGC STEEL INC 04/18/01 102.75 ~q OH
AP00167375 000275 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 04/18/01 116.10 MW OH
AP00167376 000389 RIVERSIDE COF~4ERCIAL INVESTOR 04/18/01 1,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00167377 004704 RUSH, CHRIS 04/18/01 269.28 MW OH
Ap00167378 011845 SALCEDO,LOU~/gA 04/18/01 45.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167379 000214 SAN BERN COUNTY 04/18/01 3,759.04 MW OH
Ap00167380 000261 SAM BERN COUNTY 04/18/01 1,214.84 MW OH
Ap00167381 000150 SAN BERN COUNTY 04/18/01 16,588.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
Ap00167382 002458 SAM BERN~.RDINO CF~MBER OF COM 04/18/01 45.00 MW OH
Ap00167383 005338 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 04/18/01 46,398.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167384 000939 S/~N GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMP 04/18/01 1,000.00 MW OH AR
Ap00167385 006604 SCHNEIDER, D~.NIEL 04/18/01 44.51 MW OH
AP00167386 001105 SEAL FURNITURE ~ SYSTEM INC 04/18/01 700.04 MW OH
AP00167387 001829 SHARED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 04/18/01 261.84 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZ~J~E--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~Jnount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167388 000692 SIR SPEEDY 04/18/01 51.64 ME OH
AP00167389 001327 S~RT ~ FINAL 04/18/01 1,497.41 ME OR
AP00167390 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 04/18/01 93,451.99 MW OH
AP00167391 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMP~2gY 04/18/01 485.66 MW OH
AP00167392 001825 SOFT CHOICE CORP 04/18/01 240.80 ~5q OH
AP00167393 005722 SPECTP~A COMP~aNY 04/18/01 856.00 ~Sq OH
AP00167394 004284 SPORT C~ALET TEAM DIVISION 04/18/01 1,238.40 ~q OH
AP00167395 003597 STATE OF C3~LIFORNIA 04/18/01 5,254.59 ~Sq OH
AP00167396 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOLr~DA 04/18/01 1,315.38 MW OH
AP00167397 001373 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 04/18/01 1,398.75 ~ OH
AP00167398 002175 SUNNY SLOPE TREES 04/18/01 274.13 ~ OR
AP00167399 002344 T~RGET 04/18/01 1,087.76 MW OH
AP00167400 001615 TELLES, JONI 04/18/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00167401 002459 THOMj~S REGISTER OF ~3~ER MFG 04/18/01 118.80 F~q OH
AP00167402 006642 TIDE~RK COMPUTERS SYSTEMS IN 04/18/01 4,000.00 MW OH
AP00167403 005387 TIME W~J~NER TELECOM INC 04/18/01 2,533.27 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167404 006701 TIMEWISE 04/18/01 953.25 MW OH
AP00167405 002461 TOELLER, EILEEN 04/18/01 31.50 ME OH
AP00167406 001919 TOF~j~K SPORTS INC 04/18/01 460.18 ~ OH
AP00167407 001821 TREJO, KENNETH J 04/18/01 200.00 ~ OH AR
AP00167408 003388 TRUGREEN Lj~NTDCJ~RE REGIONAL 04/18/01 4,971.00 ~ OH
AP00167409 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 04/18/01 4,207.50 ME OH
AP00167410 002467 t~GA, CRRIS 04/18/01 60.00 ~F~ OR
AP00167411 003437 LrNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 04/18/01 740.47 ME OH
Ap00167412 001226 DNITED PARCEL SERVICE 04/18/01 57.43 ME OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CRECK REGISTER page 9
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZ~juE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167413 002471 USATORRES, TRUDY 04/18/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00167414 002474 V~/qCE, MARISSA 04/18/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00167415 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 04/18/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00167416 000137 VERIZON CALIFOP~NIA 04/18/01 3,459.32 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00167417 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 04/18/01 561.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Cheok DB
AP00167418 000137 VERIZON C~J~IFORNIA 04/18/01 115.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DE
AP00167419 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/18/01 3,708.15 MW OH
AP00167420 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/18/01 183.25 MW OH
AP00167421 002475 VIZCARRA, FERNA/qDO 04/18/01 60.00 MW OH
AP00167422 000478 W ARREN~ND CO, CARL 04/18/01 225.00 MW OH
AP00167423 002476 WASSILCHALK, SUSAN 04/18/01 33.00 MW OH
AP00167424 000213 WAXIE 04/18/01 2,632.02 MW OH
AP00167425 001522 WE TIP 04/18/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00167426 004405 WEST END YWCA 04/18/01 762.00 MW OH
AP00167427 001858 WESTERN LA~rD PROPERTIES 04/18/01 7,810.76 MW OH
AP00167428 000212 WILLD~NASSOCIATES 04/18/01 1,580.24 MW OH
AP00167429 001510 ZETTERBERG, BOB 04/18/01 58.21 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/18/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER page 10
WED, APR 18, 2001, 1:58 PM --req: CGONZ/~LE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33041 #S042 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 2
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 580,745.45 Number of Checks Processed: 215
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 580,745.45
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
THU, APR 19, 2001, 11:49 ~.M --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 33189 #S049 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~3nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167447 000210 CALIFOR/gIA PRESERVATION POUNT3 04/19/01 580.00 MW IP
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Void Rand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 580.00 Nun~ber of Checks Processed: ~
Total Hand Written 0.00 Nunlber of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Nu~a3er of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
GRAND TOTAL 580.00
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 04/24/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
TUE, APR 24, 2001, 10:47 ~4 --req: CGONZj~LE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN/UgCE---job: 33551 #S040 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00167468 006464 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 04/24/01 30,086.00 ~q IP
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written. 30,086.00 Number of Checks Processed: 1
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 30,086.00
RANC H O CUCAM ONGA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
StaffR
DATE: May 2, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP. City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1712001-5603,
FIBER OPTIC CABLING PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications and authorize
the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Installation of Fiber Optic Cabling at
Various Locations to be funded from Account No. 1712001-5603.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to previous City Council actions, funds have been allocated, conduits have
been installed in key locations and fiber optic cable has been acquired for the purpose
of providing the first phase of a City owned communications network between all City
facilities. Fiber optic conduits are now installed between the City Hall, Corporate Yard,
Senior Center, Fire Station 2 and Public Library. This project, if approved, will install
fiber optic cable in those conduits and provide connection points inside each of those
City facilities.
The next step will be to install any additional necessary cabling inside the buildings,
which will be accomplished by a combination of separate contract and City Staff.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
FIBER OPTIC CABLING
May 2, 2001
Page 2
In the near future, Staff will be requesting approval to advertise for bids to install fiber
optic conduits in Foothill BIvd. from Haven Ave. west to Rochester Ave. If approved
and completed and depending on priorities and available funding, staff will then request
approval to install fiber optic cabling connecting the above facilities to the Epicenter and
Family Sports Center. Fiber optic cable was acquired for this future installation at the
same time cable was acquired for this proposed installation.
Respe~c~ully submitted,
Willi~Ti~J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP:dlw
Attachment
2/,
RESOLUTION NO. ~)1" ~9q7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING
THE ADVERTISiNG OF THE "NOTICE INVITING
BIDS" FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC
CABLiNG AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS iN SAID CITY
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rm~cho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and
specifications for "INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLiNG AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for
doing the work specified, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following
words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITiNG SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May
22, 2001, sealed bids or proposals for the "INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC
CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for the INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC
CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS".
PREVAILiNG WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is
required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a
similar character in the locality in which the public ~vork is performed, and not less than
the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that
regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is
required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies
of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall
cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as
penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each
laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if
such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages
herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under
him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing
tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee
nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship
program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of
apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio
of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to
the request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of
one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide
or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an am~ual average of not less than
one apprentice to eight joumeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the
administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or
journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the
public works site are making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of
Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship
Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in
the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall
comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with
working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of
the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of
the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before
mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is
required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute
the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in
the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code
Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or
bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least
10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed
contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of fai lure to enter into such contract
said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucmnonga
to the difl~rence between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any
shall be returned to the lotvest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for
said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an
mnount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the
payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done
thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries
compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract
~vhich may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the
construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City ofRancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder' s Proposal the Prime Contractor
shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all
applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this
contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering
Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the
work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the
Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et.
seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the
expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that
the information being provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available
at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00
(THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder,
copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by
payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of
$15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set
forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole
cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance
retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2001
Publish Dates: May 8 and May 15, 2001
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this 2nd day of May, 2001.
Williron J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of
said City Council held on the 2nd day of May, 2001
Executed this 2nd day of May, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: May 8 and May 15, 2001
RA C HO CUCA MON GA
ENGINEERING DEPARTFiENT
Staff Report
May 2, 2001
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Ill': Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR
ENCROACHMENT INTO CITY EASEMENT OR RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND WILLIAM AND HILDA HORDYK AT A
LOCATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, WEST OF
VINEYARD AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of agreement For
Encroachment Into City Easement Or Right-Of-Way between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and William
and Hilda Hordyk. Encroachment location is on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard
Avenue adjacent to parcel generally known as 8870 San Bernardino Road.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a result of a current development project at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard
Avenue, San Bernardino Road west of Vineyard Avenue and directly north of the project was fully
improved by the developer. To facilitate the widening of San Bernardino Road, four existing masonry
columns, one of which contained a mailbox, located on the north side of San Bernardino Road adjacent to
an existing parcel generally known as 8870 San Bernardino Road, were removed. The owners of the
parcel desired to have the columns reconstructed in the same locations relative to the new curb. Prior to
directing the developer to reconstruct the columns within the City's right-of-way the owners were
requested to execute the attached Agreement For Encroachment Into City Easement Or Right-Of-Way.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MP:RO:dlw
RAN C HO C UCA M O N GA
I~NGINEERING DEPARTFfiENT
SlaffReport
DATE: May 2, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
'Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ' .
SUBJECT: , AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OE
.RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE HERMOSA~ AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
ADJACENT TO THE DEER CREEK FLOOD CHANNEL
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Common Use
Agreement between the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and authorizing
the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the Hermosa Avenue
Improvements adjacent to the Deer Creek Flood Channel.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Hermosa Avenue Improvements from 4th Street to 350' south of 8th Street are currently under
construction, with the bridge widening work approximately 95% complete at the Deer Creek Flood
Channel, located at the NEC of 4th Street and Hermosa Avenue. Prior to acceptance of the bridge
widening improvements at the Deer Creek Flood Channel a Common Use Agreement between the
City and the Flood Control District needs to be in place.
A copy of the Common Use Agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office.
Res tfully~submitte,d~.,~
Wil~,N~eil'/2~'
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Resolution {Common Use Agreement)
EXHIBIT "A"
SCRRARaiI~Tr~k~
HERMOSA AVENUE
d IMPROVEMENTS
ADJACENT TO THE
FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL
4~ S~reet I,,,,,,,,
Ii.'1'.1.
LeerlleemAvee lqreests. F!me t.~tote l)eeCreekFl~C!eed
VICINITY MAP
RESOLUTION NO. 0/' D ~' ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE COMMON USE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its
consideration a Common Use Agreement between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for the
Hermosa Avenue Improvements adjacent to the Deer Creek Flood Channel; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement is for the construction, operation and
maintenance of roadway improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby resolves that said Common Use Agreement be hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Common Use
Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest thereto.
T H E C I T Y 0 F
]~ANCHO CUCAMONGA
StaffRe rt
DATE: May 2, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE AUTOMATED
REFUSE AMENDMENTS FOR BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES,
INC. AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE INLAND EMPIRE
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council approve the two (2) attached automated refuse collection
amendments for Burdec Waste Industries, Inc. and Waste Management of the
Inland Empire.
Analysis
The City Council approved the automated refuse collection service at its
February 21,2001 City Council meeting and directed Staff to return with the
amendments. Attached are the two (2) amendments that have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney's office.
R pestfully ~
City Engineer
Attachments
3 -I
~J4ENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ~jqD EXCLUSIVE PERMIT WITH BURRTEC WASTE
INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE AND
RECYCLABLES WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SERVICE AREAS ONE, THREE AND FOUR
IN THE CITY OF ttNCHO CUCAMONGA
This Amendment to that certain Agreement between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation ("City"), and Burrtec Waste
Industries, Inc., formerly known as Rancho Disposal Service, Inc. (the
"Permittee"), dated July 1, 1985 and identified as Contract No. 85-082, for
the collection and disposal of refuse within residential service area four in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as supplemented by the Assignment and Transfer
of Permit by Yukon Disposal Service to Permittee, approved by the City Council
on August 18, 1999, for the collection and disposal of refuse within
residential service areas one and three in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is
made and entered into this day of May, 2001.
RECITALS
A. City entered into a written agreement with Permittee, dated
July 1, 1985, for the collection and disposal of refuse within residential
service area four, and City approved the Assignment and Transfer Of Permit by
Yukon Disposal Service to Permittee, approved by the City Council on August
18, 1999, for the collection and disposal of refuse within residential service
areas one and three (collectively, the ~Agreement").
B. City desires to amend the Agreement to provide for automated
collection of solid waste and recyclables as an effective means of reducing
waste streams in compliance with AB 939 and the City's Source Reduction and
Recycling Element (SREE).
C. City desires to amend the Agreement to provide that no rate
adjustment shall be made to the rates set forth for residential refuse
collection in Resolution No. 94-183 for two years, beginning February 21, 2001
11231.0001 651879.1
and ending July 1, 2003, and that permittee shall not charge residential
customers for extra containers. Permittee mayl after July 1, 2002, apply to
City Council in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 8.17 of
Municipal Code for consideration of a charge for additional containers.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
Section 1. The Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
Permittee shall provide automated collection of solid waste and recyclables.
All services provided pursuant to the Agreement shall be in accordance with
new paragraphs (E) and (F).
Section 2. Section IV Standards for Collections of Exhibit A
Specifications of Contract No. 85-082 shall be amended to add new paragraphs E
and F, and all subsequent paragraphs shall be renumbered sequentially, as
follows:
~'E. Refuse trucks are equipped with a mechanical arm that lifts
and empties a specially designed refuse/recyclable container that has wheels
and attached lids. The waste hauler provides these automated containers.
F. The standard size is a black 96-gallon container for regular
trash and a blue 65-gallon container for recyclables. Permittee will provide
containers for both regular trash and recyclables, but will continue with
current manual pickup of green waste using the customers' own containers.
Section 3. Except as specifically amended herein, the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the P~A~TIES hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the date first above stated.
CITY OF RA~CHO CUCAMONGA,
a California municipal corporation
11231.0001 651879.1
J5-5
Mayor
ATTESTED BY
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
James L. Markman
City Attorney
BURRTEC WASTE iNDUSTRIES, INC.
President
11231.0001 651879.1
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND EXCLUSIVE PERMIT WITH WASTE MANAGEMENT
OF THE INLAND EMPIRE FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE,
RECYCLABLES ~qD GREEN WASTE WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SERVICE AREA TWO IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
This Amendment to that certain Agreement between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation ("City"), and Western Waste
Industries (the ~Permittee"), dated July 1, 1985 and identified as Contract
No. 86-068, for the collection and disposal of refuse within residential
service area two in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is made and entered into
this day of May, 2001.
RECITALS
A. City entered into a written agreement with Permittee, dated
July 1, 1985, for the collection and disposal of refuse within residential
service area two (the ~Agreement").
B. City desires to amend the Agreement to provide for automated
collection of solid waste, recyclables and green waste collection as an
effective means of reducing waste streams in compliance with AB 939 and the
City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SREE).
C. City desires to amend the Agreement to provide that no rate
adjustment shall be made to the rates set forth for residential refuse
collection in Resolution No. 94-183 for two years, beginning February 21, 2001
and ending July 1, 2003, and that Permittee shall not charge residential
customers for extra containers. Permittee may, after July 1, 2002, apply to
City Council in accordance with the procedures set forth in Cahpter 8.17 of
Municipal Code for consideration of a charge for additional containers.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
11231.0001 652196.1
Section 1. The Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
Permittee shall provide automated collection of solid waste, recyclables and
green waste. All services provided pursuant to the Agreement shall be in
accordance with new paragraphs (E) and (F).
Section 2. Section IV Standards for Collections of Exhibit A
Specifications of Contract No. 85-082 shall be amended to add new paragraphs E
and F, and all subsequent paragraphs shall be renumbered sequentially, as
follows:
~E. Refuse trucks are equipped with a mechanical arm that lifts
and empties specially designed refuse/recyclable/green waste containers that
have wheels and attached lids. The waste hauler provides these automated
containers.
F. The standard size is a grey 96-gallon container with a black
lid for trash, a grey 96-gallon container with a green lid for green waste and
a grey 96-gallon container with a grey lid for recyclables. Permittee will
provide containers for regular trash, green waste and recyclables.
Section 3. Except as specifically amended herein, the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the date first above stated.
CITY OF RAECHO CUCAMONGA,
a California municipal corporation
Mayor
ATTESTED BY
City Clerk
11231.0001 652196.1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
James L. Markman
City Attorney
WESTERN WASTE INDUSTRIES
President
11231.0001 652196.1
RA C h 0 C UCA MONGA
EN GI N EERIN G D EPARTMENT
DATE: May 2, 2001
TO: Cbaitman and Agency Members
Jack Lain, AICP, Executive Director
FROM: William 3. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale B. Cat~on, City Facilities Supen, isor
SUBJECT: ACCEPT CONSTRUCTION, RELEASE Ttt~ RETF. NTION, AND FILE A
NOTICE OF CO1HPLETION FOR TIlE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
CORPORATE YARD, PHASE II, WAREItOUSE
RECOMMENDATION
The construction of the Corporate Yard, Phase II, Warehouse has been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency accept said construction, authorize
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the release of the retention in the
amount of $85,603.00 to RC Construction.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
RC Construction has successfully ful~lled the construction of the warehouse building in compliance
with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Raneho Cucamonga on file in the Office of
the City Clerk.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DB:dlw
RESOLUTION NO. ~;) I' ~) ~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ACCEPTING
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORPORATE YARD,
PHASE II, WAREHOUSE, AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE
OF THE RETENTION AND FILING A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements have been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and.
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City
Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County.
I~AN HO CUCAM ONGA
COMMUNITY ~E~VICES
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
DATE: May 2, 2001
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution in Support of an Application for Senior
Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B Grant Funds for
Senior Services that Promote Socialization
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council approve the attached Resolution in support of the Community Services
Department's application for Senior Supportive Services Older American Act Title III-B grant funds
for senior services that promote socialization.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services is the Area Agency that
assists in the allocation of senior citizen program grants from the California Department of Aging.
The Community Services Department has received funding ($3,000 per year) from the County for
the past three years. This year, due to County contracting guidelines it is necessary for the County
to issue a competitive Request for Applications (RFA) for this funding. It is anticipated that the
funding cycle for the RFA will be a one-year grant with options to re-fund for the next three years.
The Community Services Department is preparing an application for continued funding for senior
services that promote socialization. Funds received will be used to enhance recreational/social
services for senior citizen using the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Specifically we will focus
on recreational activities that center on the physical, social, psychological, educational and
recreational needs of older persons. In order to proceed with the RFA process, the attached
Resolution needs to be approved by City Council and forwarded along with our application for
funding the County Department of Aging and Adult Services by 4:00 p.m. on May 7, 2001.
,~ tfully ~~,
Kevin C~rdl
C~ices Director
~MMSERV%~unci~&B~ardst~ity~unci~ta~Rep~r~s~Seni~n3rantRes~uti~n5.2.~1.d~c
RESOLUTION NO. 01- / (~ 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR SENIOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES OLDER
AMERICAN ACT TITLE III-B GRANT FUNDS FOR SENIOR SERVICES THAT PROMOTE
SOCIALIZATION.
WHEREAS, the San Bemardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services is the Area
Agency that assists in the allocation of senior citizen program grants from the California Department
of Aging; and
WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services is
seeking applications from interested and qualified organizations and firms to provide senior
supportive services pursuant to Title Ill-B; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the County of San Bernardino Department of
Aging and Adult Services requires applicants to certify by resolution the approval of the submission
of an application to the County for funding consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucemonga Community Services intends to submit an
application for funding.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby approve the filing of an application for Senior Supportive Services Older
American Act Title III-B grant funds with the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult
Services for the provision of senior services that promote socialization.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2"d day of May, 2001.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
-2-
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 2"d
day of May, 2001.
Executed this 2"d day of May, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
-3-
THE CiTY OF
I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 2, 2001
T~. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2000-2004 CONSOLIDATED PLAN - A review
of the federally required Consolidated Plan Annual .Action Plan for Fiscal Year
2001-2002, including the final selection of projects for the CDBG annual
application, based on a new grant allocation of $1,001,000, and a proposed
amendment to the 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan to address a proposed new
senior center facility and to revise the loan and grant amounts of the Home
Improvement Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council conduct a public hearing, take public testimony regarding the application
for funding, and adopt the Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan and amendment to the
Consolidated Plan, thereby authorizing the Mayor to submit the plan to the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for their consideration.
BACKGROUND:
Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") funds are provided by HUD to cities and
counties based on a formula that considers the community's population, extent of poverty, and
age of the housing stock. Based upon this formula, the City expects to receive a grant
allocation of $1,001,000, an increase of $41,000, or 4.27 percent over current program year
funding. The current year funding was increased by $1,000, representing a 0.1 percent
increase from the prior year.
CDBG regulations require that at least 70 percent of all funds be directed to activities that
benefit low and moderate-income persons. Of the activities proposed for the 2001-2002
program year, 93 percent will benefit low- and moderate-income persons.
d/
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
2001-2002 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDBG)
May 2, 2001
Page 2
To be eligible for funding, activities must meet one of the two primary goals of the CDBG
program:
1. The development of viable, urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable
living environment; and
2. The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate-
income.
On March 21, 2001, the City Council conducted a public hearing to take testimony concerning
the City's housing and community development needs. At that meeting, the City Council
recommended approval of the draft Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan with a modification to
provide funding for three additional public service activities. These include: Campfire Boys and
Girls ($6,700), Project Sister ($9,700), and YMCA - Senior Transportation ($15,000). This
change was made possible by refining the funding level estimates of certain public facility
improvements.
AMENDMENT TO THE 2000-2004 CONSOLIDATED PLAN:
Staff is proposing the establishment of a program to evaluate the development of a new Senior
Center and provide funding to assist in its construction. The proposed project would require
multi-year funding for both design and construction activities. The allocation of $144,000 would
allow the design process to begin that will provide a conceptual Master Plan that can be used to
plan and promote the new Senior Center facility. Additionally, $150,000 will be banked to assist
funding of future construction activities. At this time, the Senior Center project is estimated to
cost $5 million.
The 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan was approved by the City Council on May 3, 2000. The
Consolidated Plan established a program for expansion and construction activities at the current
Senior Center, but not for the development of a new Senior Center. Community Services and
Community Development staff are proposing the amendment to address the growing needs of
the senior population.
An amendment to the level of funding available for home Improvement loans and grants is also
proposed. Current funding levels permit loans up to a maximum of $25,000 and grants up to a
maximum of $5,000. Proposed modifications would permit an increase in loans up to a
maximum of $30,000 and grants up to a maximum of $7,500. The increase in funding is
proposed because the existing funding levels have been in effect for over 9 years, and our
ability to complete necessary repairs is hindered by increases in the cost of construction. The
proposed changed in funding will not necessarily increase the total number of persons assisted,
but it will allow for a greater number of necessary repairs to be completed.
In accordance with the Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan, the requested change
meets the criteria for an amendment to the Consolidated Plan. The City is required to provide
public notice and allow a 30-day public review period before the amendment's consideration. A
public notice was published on April 2, 2001, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, concerning the
amendment.
q2
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
2001-2002 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (CDBG)
May 2, 2001
Page 3
CORRESPONDENCE:
Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published one month prior to
the meeting on April 2, 2001, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin as a 1/8 page display ad. Notice
was also published in the La Voz newspaper on April 5, 2001.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:TG/jc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" FY 2001-2002 CDBG Funding Recommendations
Exhibit "B" FY 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan Revisions
Exhibit "C" FY 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
FY 2001-2002 Funding Analysis April 23, 2001
Project Title Requested Total Allocation
~,dministration $155,000.00 $155,000.0(
Capital Improvement Programs $660,000.00 $712,282.71
Home Improvement Programs $260,000.00 $403,643.4,.
Public Service Programs $304,407.00 $145,900.0(
Total $1,379,407.00 $1,416,826.1z
Funding Caps (% of Allocation)
Administration (20%) 15.5%
Public Service Programs (15%) 14.3%
Funding a % of Total Available Funds
Administration 10.9%
Capital Improvement Programs 50.3%
Home Improvement Programs 28.5%
Public Service Programs 10.3%
Low/Mod Percentage of Total 7.0%
Funding Differences
Prior Year plus Reprogram Funds $415,826.14
Difference Btwn Requested & Allocation -$37,419.14
Activities
Calle Vejar (Design) $35,000.00 $35,000,00'
RCSC Landscaping (Deslgn/Const) $0.00 $30,000.00i
Sidewalk Grinding $24.000.00 $24,000.00
Wheelchair Ramps $24,000.00 $24,000.00
Old Town Park $174,000.00 $174,000.00
New RCSC (Design) $144,000.00 $143.994.13
New RCSC (Construction) $150,000.00 $150,000.00
Sidewalk Study $9,000.00 $0.00
Isle House $100,000.00 $131,288.58
Subtotal - Capital Improvements $660,000.00 $712,282.71
Home Improvement Program $250,000.00 $393,643.43
Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance $10,000.00 $10,000,00
Subtotal - Home Improvement $260,000.00 $403,643.43
Graffiti Removal $22,000,00 $22,000.00
I FHMB - Fair Housing $15,897.00 $12,000.00
IFHMB - Landlord/Tenant $14,125.00 $10,000.00
HOPE $8,800.00 $6,400.00
Foothill Family Shelter $4,000.00 $3,000,00
House Of Ruth $9,130.00 $7,600.00
SOVA ' $11.000.00 $7,000,00
YWCA - Y-Teen $8,500.00 $7,000.00
YMCA - West End Kids Club $7,000.00 $6,000.00
YMCA - Your Own Club $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Community Services - Senior Programs $10 000.00 $10,000.00i
RC Library - Back To Basics $10,000.00 $10,000.00:
Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition $25,555,00 $8,500.0(
Campfire Boys and Girls $6,700.00 $6,700.0(
Project Sister $9,700.00 $9,700.0(
YMCA - Senior Transportation $15,000.00 $15,000.0(
A Baby Isn't Trash Foundation $14,000,00 $0.0(
3omputars for Kids Foundation $25,000.00 $0.00
:)ove Enterprises $83,000.00 $0.00
Subtotal - Public Service Programs , . , .
Page 51
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this
program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, 20 households should receive assistance.
Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program.
The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program provides newly constructed and/or rehabilitated
single-family homes to low- and moderate-income homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood.
NHDC plans to complete the construction of new homes, as well as the rehabilitated existing homes
to provide the homes available for this program. The newly constructed homes are typically sold to
income-eligible homebuyers earning up to 90% of the area median family income. The rehabilitated
homes are leased for a two-year period at affordable rents to families earning between 45% and
60% of the area median family income. At the end of the two year lease period, the tenant will be
offered a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to properly maintain and pay for the
home and can arrange financing for an affordable first mortgage.
Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood.
Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the Redevelopment Agency that they are
able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2005, the sale or lease of 8 newly constructed or
rehabilitated homes.
OBJECTIVE5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH
EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING.
Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single family and
mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income
homeowners.
The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible
owner-occupied households, those earning less than 80% of the area median family income. The
program~ offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500, including
emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and lends the money, secures
contractors, oversees the work, and maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than
farming this work out to the bank or homeowner.
Resources: CDBG funds.
~ The Consolidated Plan originally identified a maximum of $25,000 for deferred loans and $5,000 for grants, The
May 2, 2001, revision increased the maximum to $30,000 for deferred loans and to $7,500 for grants,
Community Development Block Grant 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 70
program will create a more enriching environment for these neighborhoods.
Resources: CDBG funds.
Geogrephic Location: The Northtown or Southwest Cucamonga target neighborhoods.
Accomplishments: The evaluation and determination of a new community recreation location.
Program 10.52: Evaluate the development of a new Senior Center and provide funding
to assist in its construction.
This is a multi-year project that includes funding for both design and construction activities. This
activity will begin the design process that will provide a conceptual master plan that can be used to
plan and promote the new Senior Center facility. Additionally, funds will be banked to bank for future
construction activities.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division.
Geographic Location: Citywide as the project will study an appropriate location for the new Senior
Center.
Resources: CDBG funds, State grants, City general fund.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Completion of design process for the development of a
conceptual master plan for construction of a new Senior Center facility by June 30, 2002. Bank
funds to assist in funding the construction of a new Senior Center facility through June 30, 2005.
OBJECTIVE 11: ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME
PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.
Program 11.1: Assist public service agencies that assist groups in the highest priority
categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant
mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters,
domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy
programs.
The City will continue to assist public service providers that improve the quality of life for low- and
moderate-income persons and those with special needs.
Resources: CDBG funds.
Geographic Location: While most of the agencies funded are not located within the City's
jurisdictional boundaries, all City residents are eligible to receive services.
This program was added during the development of the 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan.
Community Development Block Grant 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
2001-2002 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
(July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2002)
May 2, 2001
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (SF424) ............................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................3
RESOURCES AVAILABLE ....................................................................................................................3
FEDERAL RESOURCES ..........................................................................................................3
OTHER RESOURCES .............................................................................................................4
LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS ..................................................................................... 5
ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ........................................................................................................5
AFFORDABLE HOUSING .........................................................................................................5
OBJECTIVE 1 ................................. 5
OBJECTIVE 2 ............................................................................................................6
OBJECTIVE 3 ............................................................................................................7
OBJECTIVE 4 ............................................................................................................8
OBJECTIVE 5 ............................................................................................................9
OBJECTIVE 6 ..........................................................................................................10
HOMELESS ......................... 11
OBJECTIVE 7 ..........................................................................................................11
HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN ...................................................................................................12
SPECIAL NEEDS ..................................................................................................................12
OBJECTIVE 8 ..........................................................................................................12 ,
OBJECTIVE 9 ..........................................................................................................13
SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN ...........................................................................................13
NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ............................................................. 14
OBJECTIVE 10 ........................................................................................................14
OBJECTIVE 11 ........................................................................................................16
OBJECTIVE 12 ........................................................................................................18
OBJECTIVE 13 ........................................................................................................19
OBJECTIVE 14 ........................................................................................................20
OBJECTIVE 15 ........................................................................................................20
OBJECTIVE 16 ........................................................................................................21
OTHER ACTIONS .............................................................................................................................21
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................21
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING ...................................................................... 22
OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER SERVED NEEDS ............................................................... 24
ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 24
ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ............................................... 25
ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS .................................... 25
ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES ....................................... 25
ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION .............. 25
PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................... 26
MONITORING .......................................................................................................................26
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ......... .... 26
APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... A-1
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
Ci~/ of Rancho Cucamonga
FY 2001-2002 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ............................................. A-1
APPENDIX "B" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... B-1
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING ................................................................... B-1
APPENDIX "C" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1 -YEAR GOALS ........................ C-1
APPENDIX "D" - ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................D-1
SUPPORTING MAPS; PROPOSED PROJECTS, POINTS OF INTEREST, CENSUS BOUNDARIES,
LOW/MOD INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT ........................................................ D-1
SUPPORTING FORMS; FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE, GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL
NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS ................................. D-1
LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS ..................................................................................... D-1
CERTIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................D-1
Application for Federal
Assistance ,o. 03,s-go43
2. Date Submitted (mm/dd/yyyy) Applicant identifier
05/17/2001 b-01-HC-06-0556
1. Type of Submission 3. Date Received by State (mmldd/yyyy) State Application identifier
Application Pre-application
[] Construction [] Construction 4. Date Received by Federal Agency (mm/dd/yyyy) Federal Identifier
[] Non-Construction [] Non*Construction
5. Appl ~cant Information
Legal Name Organizational Unit
City Of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division
Address (give city, county, State, and zip code) Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on mahers involving this
10500 Civic Center Ddve application (give area code)
P.O. BOX 807 Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner
(San Bernardino County) (909) 477-2750
6. Employer Identification Number (EIN) (xx-yyyyyyy) 7, Type of Applicant (enter appropriate letter in box) ~C~
B. County K. indian Tdbe
8. TypeofAppllcation: C. Municipal L. individual
[] New [] Continuation [] Revision D. Township M. Profit Organization
E. Interstate N Nonprofit
If Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) in box(es): [] [] F. inter-municipal O Public Housing Agency
G. Special Distdct P. Other (Specify)
A. Increase Award S. Decrease Award C. Increase Duration H. Independent School Diet.
D. Decrease Duration Other (specify) State Controlled Insfdtation of Higher Learning
9. Name of Federal Agency
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
10. catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number (xx-yyy) 11, Descriptive Title of Appficant's Project
~-- ~ Housing Rehabilitation, Street and Public Facility Improvements.
T~le: and Public Services (Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant, Graffiti
Removal, Homelesness, Food Assistance, Domestic Violence,
Community Development Block Grant Senior, Youth, and Literacy) Programs.
12. Areas Affected by Project (cities, counties, States, etc.)
Community Wide
13. Proposed Project 14. Congressional Districts of
Start Date (mm/ddtyyyy) ~ Ending Date (mm/dd/yyyy) a. licant 42
07/01/2001 06/30/2002 '~P~ b. Project
15. Estimated Funding ~ 16. Is Application Subject to Review by State Executive
Order '12372 Process?
a. Yes This pre-application/application was made available to the
State Executive Order 12372 Process for review on:
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)_
Complete form HUD-424-M, Funding Matrix
b. No [] Program is not covered by E.O. 12372
or [] Program has not been selected by State for review.
17.Is the Applicant Delinquent on Any Federal Debt?
[] Yes If "Yes," attach an explanation [] No
18. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application/pre-application are true and correct, the document has been duly
authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant will comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded.
a, Typed Name of Atahodzed Representative b. Title c. Telephone Number (Include Area Code)
William J. Alexander Mayor (909) 477-2700
d. Signature of Authodzed Representative e. Date Signed (mnVddlyyyy) 05/02/2001
Previous Edition Usable form SF-424 (7/97)
Aumodzed for Local Reproduction Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
OMB Approval (pending)
Federal Assistance Funding Matrix
The applicant must provide the funding matrix shown below, listing each program for which Federal funding is being requested, and
complete the certifications.
Program* Applicant Federal State Local Other Program Total
Sham Share Share Income
CDBG
$1,001,000 $1,001,00C
Grand Totals $1,001,000 $1,001,000
* For FHIPs, show both initiative and component
Instructionsforthe HUD-424-M
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated Federal Share: Enter the amount of H UD funds you are requesting
to average 45 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing with your application.
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and main- StateShare: Entertheamountoffundsorcashequivalentofin-kind
tainingthedataneeded, and completing and reviewing the collection services the State is contributing to your project or program of
of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a activities.
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
Local Share: Enter the amount of funds or cash equivalent of in-
unless that collection displays a valid OMB control number.
kind services your local government is contributing to your project or
This form is to be used by applicants requesting funding from the program of activities.
Department of Housing and Urban Development for application Other: Enter the amount of other sourcos of private, non-profit, or
submissions for Federal assistance.
other funds or cash equivalent of in-kind services being contributed
Enter the following information: to your project or program of activities.
Program: The HUD funding program you are applying under. Program Income: Enter the amount of program income you expect
Applicant Share: Enter the amount of funds or cash equivalent of to generate and contribute to this program over the life of your award.
in-kind contributions you are contributing to your project or program Total: Please total all columns and fill in the amounts.
of activities.
Authorized for local reproduction Page I form HUD-424-M (1/2000)
ref. OMB Circular A-102
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
INTRODUCTION
The Annual Action Plan provides a plan of investment and an outline of activities expected to
be undertaken during the 2001-2002 program year. The report identifies local objectives and pdodty
needs identified to implement the primary objective of the Community Development Block Grant
("CDBG") program, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent
housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principallyfor low-and
moderate-income persons.
RESOURCES AVAILABLE
· FEDERAL RESOURCES
Community Development Block Grant
CDBG funds are the primary federal funds available to the City during the program year. The
City's grant allocation available for fiscal year 2001-2002 is expected to be $1,001,000, which is
$41,000 more than fiscal year 2000-2001. CDBG funds reprogrammed from previous years total
$177,361.16, providing $1,178,361.16 available for funding program activities. The sum of all
CDBG funds available totals $1,416,828.14, which includes $238,464.98 in prior year program
funds. The City did not receive any program during the 2000-2001 program year, and does not
expect to receive any program income dudng the 2001-2002 program year.
San Bemardino County Housing Authorfty
The San Bernardino County Housing Authority serves as the local housing authority for the
region. The Agency currently operates 170 Section 8 housing units and 16 public housing units
located within the City. Sources of funds available to City residents through the Housing Authority
are primarily limited to Section 8, Comprehensive Grant Improvement, and the Public Housing
programs.
County of San Bemardino, Department of Economic and Community Development
The County receives federal funds to implement the HOME Consortlure, which the City
joined in July 1995. in 1999 the City renewed their commitment to the HOME Consortlure by signing
a 3-year Cooperation Agreement covedng the time period from October 1, 1999, to September 30,
2002. The County operates four programs through the HOME Consortlure that include the HOME
Homeownership Assistance Program ("HAP"), HOME Tenant Based Assistance ("TBA") Program,
HOME Rental Property Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, and the HOME Community Housing
Development Organization Program. The County allocation for these programs total $4,239,000
and includes funds for program administration. These programs are all available to City residents
on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation in the County HOME Consortlure.
The Homeownership Assistance, Tenant Based Assistance, and Rental Property Acquisition
and Rehabilitation programs are discussed under specific activities in the Consolidated Plan. The
Community Housing Development Organization ("CHDO') Set-Aside program is not identified and
therefore warrants further discussion.
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
The CHDO program is funded through a mandatory Set-Aside from the County HOME
Consortlure and provides funds for affordable housing that is developed, sponsored, or owned by
non-profits that have been certified as CHDO's. The CHDO program functions as a source of
funding for a variety of projects including new construction and rehabilitation of residential
structures. Funds are not targeted to a specific area or project type within the County; however,
recipient income cannot exceed 80% of the County medium family income. HOME funds are
available to eligible residents citywide on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's participation ,
in the County HOME Consortlure, with approximately $1,715,000 allocated to this program.
· OTHER RESOURCES
City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
State law requires redevelopment agencies to set aside at least 20% of tax increment
revenue for increasing and improving the communit,/s supply of low- and moderate-income housing.
Between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2005, approximately $39 million will be generated by tax
increment for affordable housing. The tax increment allocation to the 20 Percent Set-Aside during
the reporting pedod is projected to be $6,291,871. The Agency's tax increment has been pledged
against several on-going projects, and therefore, there is little unobligated funding available.
In July 1996, the Redevelopment Agency approved the sale of tax allocation bonds to
provide permanent financing for two community based non-profit organizations, Southern California
Housing Development Corporation CSCHDC") and Northtown Housing Development Corporation
CNHDC"). On September 1, 1996, Tax Allocation Bonds in the amount of $37.66 million were sold.
Proceeds of the bonds will be allocated in the following manner:
· A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with SCHDC where $3.9 million will
be provided annually for debt services and project reserves. Beginning year 6, if the
provision of Redevelopment Law that allows for the acquisition of existing units with Housing
Set-Aside funds has been extended beyond its current sunset, this $790,000 of the annual
pledge will be deposited into a "Future Project Reserves" fund for use in acquiring additional
apartment complexes within the Project Area. If a program is not developed, the funds will
be available for any Redevelopment Agency housing program.
· A pledge agreement through the year 2025 was signed with NHDC where $1.5 million was
paid to N H DC on June 30, 1996, and again on December 30, 1996. An additional $5 million
in net bond proceeds were also paid to the NHDC. These bond proceeds will be used to
complete a portion of the capital improvement plan for the Northtown neighborhood that
includes continuing the development of in~ll housing on vacant lots, acquisition and
rehabilitation of existing absentee-owned housing. The annual pledge amount will be $1.4
million through the year 2025.
4
Community Development B/ock Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucarnonga
· LEVERAGING AND MATCHING FUNDS
The primary source of fund leveraging will occur in conjunction with activities carried out
through Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds. This is accomplished through
public/private partnerships with non-profit housing development corporations such as the NHDC and
the SCHDC. Other potential sources for leveraging include HOME funds and Low-Income Housing
Tax Credits.
ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN
· AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OBJECTIVE 1: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-
FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK.
Program 1.1: Acquisition of existing multi-family units to be held for future affordable
housing stock.
Activity 1.1.1: This activity includes the acquisition of restricted, and previously unrestricted,
at-risk units. The SCHDC, with pledge assistance from the Redevelopment
Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds obtained replacement financing for
several complexes within the City. The SCHDC owns and manages the
complexes, and the Redevelopment Agency monitors the affordability
covenants checking quarterly to ensure units are rented according to the
agreement and the occupants comply with established income categories.
Lead Agency: The SCHDC, with funding assistance by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency.
Geographic Location: Activities will pdmadly occur in the Redevelopment target area, however,
units may be acquired citywide.
Resources: Bonds issued by the Redevelopmerit Agency and a loan from the California Housing
Finance Authority ("CHFA') were used to provide long-term replacement financing for 4 SCHDC
affordable housing complexes. A 1996-97 Redevelopment Agency tax allocation bond issue
provided approximately $30 million for replacement financing. An annual pledge of $3.9 million of
Agency Housing funds provides bond debt service and project reserve funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: There are currently a total of 4 apartment complexes,
containing 1,096 total units with 504 held as affordable. The complexes include: Sycamore Spdngs
Apartments (96 of 240 units), Mountainside Apartments (192 of 384 units), Monterey Village
Apartments (112 of 224 units), and Rancho Verde Village Apartments (104 of 246 units). Monterey
Village and Mountainside Apartments were acquired in FY 95-96 and Sycamore Springs and
Rancho Verde Apartments were acquired in FY 96-97. The SCHDC is actively pursuing additional
units and expects to begin building a 49 unit senior apartment complex, with 100% held as
affordable, during the program year.
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Program 1.2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes.
Activity 1.2.1: The NHDC anticipates acquiring up to 3 homes for rehabilitation during the
program year. The NHDC is the owner/developer of the rehabilitated lots;
however, these lots are purchased with assistance from the Redevelopment
Agency. This program is also part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer
program where newly constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes
are available to low- and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown
neighborhood. (See Objective4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1.)
Lead Agency: The NHDC.
Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood.
Resources: NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds and pdvate
financing.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, up to 3 homes will be rehabilitated and
leased for two years to a household with an income up to 60% of the area median family income.
OBJECTIVE 2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND
MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON the
PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS.
Program 2.1: Construction of affordable multi-family units.
Activity 2.1.1: There are no activities proposed under this program during the 2001-2002
program year.
Program 2.2: Construction of single-family infill development in low- and moderate-
income neighborhoods.
Activity 2.2.1: The NHDC has obtained 6 lots for the construction of new homes on infill lots
within the Northtown target neighborhood. The homes will be available to
families with incomes between 80% and 90% of the area median income.
The NHDC is the owner/developer of the infill lots; however, these lots are
purchased with assistance from the Redevelopment Agency. This program
is also part of the NHDC's First-Time Home Buyer program where newly
constructed and/or rehabilitated single-family homes are available to low-
and moderate-income home buyers in the Northtown neighborhood. (See
Objective 4, Program 4.3, Activity 4.3.1 .) Due to the inability to obtain
additional vacant lots this activity may not continue for the duration of the
Consolidated Plan.
Lead Agency: The NHDC.
Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood.
6
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City ofRancho Cucarnonga
Resources: The NHDC leveraged Redevelopment Agency 20 Percent Set-Aside funds with
subsidies from the Affordable Housing Program and permanent first-mortgages from Home Loan
Bank of San Francisco.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, complete the construction of 6 new
homes.
OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE-
INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN
PERMANENT HOUSING.
Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino
County for future Section 8 and public housing assistance.
Activity 3.1.1: The Housing Authority routinely requests assistance from the City when
applying for Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers for public housing
assistance. The City will continue to support these applications. The agency
currently operates 6,257 Section 8 units of which 170 are located within the
City. The agency also operates 16 public housing units and rents them to
qualified households at affordable rates.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Housing Authority.
Geographic Location: These programs are available citywide.
Resources: Federal Housing and Urban Development funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 170 Section 8 and 16 public housing
applications.
Program 3.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Tenant Based Assistance
{TBA) program.
Activity 3.2.1: The Tenant Based Assistance ("TBA") program is offered through the County
HOME Consortlure and is available to eligible residents. The County has
designed the program to provide assistance not only to those who meet
federal preferences, but also to those who met a "special need." The County
targets monthly rental assistance to eligible households that include a
disabled family member, and they place a priority on providing security
deposit assistance to families experiencing "temporary" housing situations
where the temporary housing or shelter is either not suitable or not available
as permanent housing.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development,
HOME Consortium.
7
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Geographic Location: Available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $600,000 allocated to this
program. This includes $400,000 in monthly rental assistance and $200,000 in security deposit
assistance.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Approximately 6 households should receive assistance by
June 30, 2002. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in
Rancho Cucamonga.
OBJECTIVE 4: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-
INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLYTHROUGH HOMEBUYER
ASSISTANCE.
Program 4.1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program.
Activity 4.1.1: The Redevelopment Agency is administering a Home Buyer program using
down payment assistance loans. The loan is 10% of the purchase price up
to a maximum of $16,000.00. The loan is forgiven if the buyer remains in the
unit for 30 years.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: Redevelopment Agency Set-Aside funds: $150,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, assist a maximum of 5 homebuyers.
Program4.2: Participate in the County HOME consortium Homeownership
Assistance Program (HAP) for eligible first-time homebuyers.
Activity 4.2.1: The County of San Bernardino operates the Homeownership Assistance
Program ("HAP") in which households earning less than 60% of the median
family income may receive assistance in the purchase of a first home. The
HAP provides a silent second trust deed program for low-income
homebuyers.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development,
HOME Consortium.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $1,000,000 allocated to this
program.
8
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Approximately 4 households should receive assistance by
June 30, 2002. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program in
Rancho Cucamonga.
Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer Program.
Activity 4.3.1: The NHDC's First Time Home Buyer Program provides newly constructed
and/or rehabilitated single-family homes to low- and moderate-income
homebuyers in the Northtown neighborhood. NHDC plans to complete the
construction of 6 new homes (see Affordable Housing, Objective 2, Program
2.1, Activity 2.1.1), as well as the rehabilitation of 3 homes (see Affordable
Housing, Objective 1, Program 1.2, Activity 1.2.1) to provide the homes
available for this program. The newly constructed homes are typically sold to
income-eligible homebuyers earning between 80% and 90% of the area
median family income. The rehabilitated homes are leased for a two-year
period at affordable rents to families earning up to 60% of the area median
family income. At the end of the two year lease period, the tenant will be
offered a purchase option if they have demonstrated the ability to properly
maintain and pay for the home and can arrange financing for an affordable
first mortgage.
Lead Agency: The NHDC.
Geographic Location: The Northtown target neighborhood.
Resources: The NHDC received a pledge amount from the Redevelopment Agency that they are
able to use accordingly to meet the goals of their affordable housing program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, the sale or lease of 9 newly constructed or
rehabilitated homes.
OBJECTIVE5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH
EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING.
Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and
mobile homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income
homeowners.
Activity5.1.1: The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement
Program available to eligible owner-occupied households, those earning less
than 80% of the area median family income. The program offers deferred
payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500, including
emergency repair grants. The City runs this as a full service program and
not only lends the money, but secures contractors, oversees the work, and
maintains administration of the grants and loans rather than farming this
work out to the bank or homeowner. While this method requires additional
9
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
staff time, it is done to provide a high level of customer service and ensure
both consistent and efficient results.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $393,643.43 (includes $143,643.43 in prior year funding of this activity).
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, provide assistance to 40 households with
incomes below 80% of the area median family income.
Program 5.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Rental Rehabilitation
Program.
Activity 5.2.1: This is a program is available to residents of local projects through the
County HOME Consortium. HOME funds are available for low interest loans
to acquire and/or rehabilitate existing rental property in exchange for
affordable rental units. Funds may be used for moderate rehabilitation
efforts, with a maximum allowed of up to $25,000 per unit. The HOME
assisted units will be subject to specific rent limits, and be available to low-
and very-low income residents. This program also provides funding for the
refinancing and rehabilitation of multi-family units.
Lead Agency: County of San Bernardino, Department of Economic and Community Development,
HOME Consortium.
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: HOME funds are available on a first-come first-serve basis through the City's
participation in the County HOME Consortium, with approximately $500,000 allocated to this
program.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: No known units are proposed forassistance dudng the 2001-
2002 program year. The City will work with the County HOME Consortium to publicize this program
in Rancho Cucamonga.
OBJECTIVE 6: IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME
HOUSEHOLDS.
Program6.1: Support applications of the Housing Authority for their Annual
Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing
residents.
Activity 6.1.1: Each year the City has certified consistency of the Housing Authority's
Comprehensive Grant program with the Consolidated Plan. The City will
continue to do so for the Comprehensive Plan.
10
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Lead Agency: County of San Bemardino, Housing Authority.
Geographic Location: This program will benefit residents citywide.
Resources: Federal Comprehensive Grant funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Annually support 16 public housing applications.
· HOMELESS
OBJECTIVE 7: ASSIST HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND PERSONS WITH
SPECIAL NEEDS, AND THOSE AT-RISK OF HOMELESSNESS.
Program 7.1: Continue to support of local homeless facilities and services.
Activity 7.1.1: The City currently provides assistance to a variety of organizations that
provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter. The City
will continue to address pdority needs, and will continue to evaluate the
provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include:
Homeless Outreach, Pre.qrams, and Education ("HOPE"): This agency provides assistance to
individuals and families who are or are at-risk of homelessness and include such services as
advocacy, education, shelter vouchers, and referrals. HOPE is located at 213 North Fern Avenue,
Ontario, CA 91762.
Foothill Family Shelter: Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90-day transitional shelter for homeless
families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and
permanent housing. They are located at 167 North Third Avenue and at 230 and 238 North San
Antonio Avenue in Upland, CA 91786.
House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe,
self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-dsk of homelessness.
Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis
intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs.
House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711.
Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunqer Proqram ("SOVA"): SOVA offers a 5-day
food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health
and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC
offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontado, CA
91761.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
11
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Resources: CDBG funds: · HOPE: $6,400.
· Foothill Family Shelter: $3,000.
· House of Ruth: $7,600.
· SOVA: $7,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, assist the following: · HOPE - 150 persons.
· Foothill Family Shelter - 6 families.
· House of Ruth - 1,600 persons.
· SOVA- 1,280 persons.
· HOMELESS ANNUAL PLAN
The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a
continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining
permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those
agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in
assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. These activities
include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral
services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who
are at-risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for
those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent
housing opportunities.
· SPECIAL NEEDS
OBJECTIVE 8: PROVIDE NECESSARY REHABILITATION SERVICES TO SPECIAL
NEEDS POPULATIONS WITH EMPHASIS ON ASSISTING THE ELDERLY
AND FRAIL ELDERLY.
Program8.1: Provide minor and emergency rehabilitation services to eligible
households with emphasis on assistance to low- and moderate-income
seniors.
Activity 8.'1 .'1: This program will complement the City's Home Improvement Program by
providing minor rehabilitation and emergency assistance to low- and
moderate-income residents and senior citizen households whose income
falls below 80% of the area median family income. Permitted home repairs
include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry, and roof repairs. Residents
who are owner occupants are eligible to receive two visits, up to $100 per
visit, and in emergency situations, the allowance of a one-time material
charge for up to $250. The agency is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue,
Fontana, CA 92335.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
12
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucarnonga
Geographic Location: This program is available to eligible residents citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, Oldtimers Foundation will assist 70 low-
and moderate-income households.
OBJECTIVE9: SUPPORT SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING SPECIAL NEEDS
POPULATIONS.
Program 9.1: Support special need services in areas where there are significant
under-served needs.
Activity 9.1.1: Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas
of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health,
and emotional well being. To meet additional parking needs for the facility,
the City entered into a 5-year lease to utilize the parking lot of an adjacent
facility. In return for the use of the parking facility the City will provide
monthly rent, maintenance, and improvements to the parking area. The use
of this parking lot is critical to the participation of senior citizen residents
utilizing Senior Center programs.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department.
Geographic Location: Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, 9791 Arrow Route.
Resources: CDBG funds: $10,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, to have assisted 550 persons through
these activities.
· SPECIAL NEEDS ANNUAL PLAN
Objectives 8 and 9, as stated above, identify actions the City intends to take over the next
program year to address the needs of persons who are not homeless, but have special needs.
13
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Acb'on Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
· NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
OBJECTIVE10: PROVIDE IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC AREAS AND PUBLIC
FACILITIES TO ENHANCE LIVING ENVIRONMENTS, IMPROVE THE
QUALITY OF LIFE IN LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND FOR LOWER INCOME INDIVIDUALS,
SENIORS, AND THE HANDICAPPED.
Program 10.1: Complete all necessary infrastructure and sidewalk improvements in
qualified target areas.
Activity 10.1.1: The City will fund the following public improvement projects:
Calle Vejar from Avenida Leon to Hellman Avenue, and Avenida Leon from Arrow Route to Calle
Vejar: The design of project improvements to include the preparation of plans, specifications, and
estimates. The design will remove the existing pavement, construct new pavementoveraggregate
base, install streetlights, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ramps for disabled. and street trees. When
completed, the project will facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-way.
Sidewalk Grindin.q and Replacement in Identified Target Nei,qhborhoods: Involves the grinding,
repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division.
Geographic Location: Calle Vejar, between Avenida Leon and Hellman Avenue, is located in CT
21, BG 2. Sidewalk Grinding efforts may be carried out in all eligible neighborhoods including CT
21, BG 2, 3, 6, & 7; CT 20.01, BG 4.
Resources: CDBG funds: · Calle Vejar: $35,000.
· Sidewalk Grinding: $24,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30. 2002, complete the design of improvements for
Calle Vejar, and replace approximately 3,960 square feet of sidewalk.
Program 10.2: Complete rehabilitation improvements to the Senior Center, including
expansion, interior rehabilitation, project landscaping, and handicap
improvements.
Activity 10.2.1: Funding of rehabilitation improvements to the Senior Center has been
reprogrammed to Program 10.5, Activity 10.5.1 for the construction of a new
Senior Center facility.
Improvements to the existing Senior Center were initially funded during the
1998-1999 and 1999-2000 program years. Proposed improvements
included: remodel the Mission Room, enclose the west patio and add an
emergency handicap exit ramp, and modify the entry corridor to allow public
14
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
access from the new parking lot. In addition, the kitchen facility is out of
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and minor renovations to
provide accessibility, and code compliance modifications will be provided.
Landscape improvements to the existing Senior Center were funded during
the 1999-2000 program year. Proposed improvements will include the
design of landscape and irrigation improvements. None of the allocated
funds have been expended, and no new funds have been allocated to this
program. Proposed landscape improvements of the Senior Centerwill occur
during the 2001-2002 program year.
Program 10.3: Develop a Fire Safety Awareness Program.
Activity 10.3.1: There are no activities proposed under this program dudng the 2001-2002
program year.
Program 10.4: Evaluate the development of a new community/recreation facility in
either the Southwest Cucamonga or Northtown target neighborhoods.
Activity 10.4.1: There are no activities proposed under this program during the 2001-2002
program year.
Program 10.5: Evaluate the development of a new Senior Center and provide funding
to assist in its construction.
Activity10.5.1: This is a multi-year project that includes funding for both design and
construction activities. This activity will begin the design process that will
provide a conceptual master plan that can be used to plan and promote the
new Senior Center facility. Additionally, funds will be banked for future
construction activities.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division.
Geographic Location: Citywide as the project will study an appropriate location for the new Senior
Center.
Resources: CDBG funds:
· New Senior Center (Design): $143,994.13 (including $17,868.62 reprogrammed from FY
00/01, Administration, Acct. 1228 ($491.95), Fair Housing, Acct. 1229 ($20.63), HOPE, Acct.
1031 ($471.00), Oldtimers Foundation Home Maintenance, Acct. 1033 ($24.14), Senior
Citizen Services, Acct. 1110 ($766.17), Rancheria Drive, Acct. 1216 ($11,733.09), Metrolink
Lift, Acct. 1217 ($4,290.00), and Back to Basics, Acct. 1218 ($71.64), and $126,125.51 in
new funds).
· New Senior Center (Construction): $150,000.00 (including $144,492.54 reprogrammed from
FY 00/01, Senior Center expansion design and construction, Accts. 1135 & 1184, and
$5,507.46 in new funds).
15
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, complete the design process for the
development of a conceptual master plan for construction of a new Senior Center facility.
OBJECTIVE 11: ASSIST LOCAL PUBLIC AND NON-PROFIT SERVICE AGENCIES THAT
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW- AND MODEPATE-INCOME
PERSONS AND THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.
Program 11.1: Assist public service agencies that support groups in the highest
priority categories including: fair housing counseling, landlord-tenant
mediation, homeless and food assistance, emergency shelters,
domestic violence shelters, and senior, youth-at-risk, and literacy
programs.
Activity 11.1 .t: The City will continue to fund public service agencies that include:
Fair Housinq: The City contracts with the Inland Mediation Board for Fair Housing services that
include education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation
Board is located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762.
Landlord Tenant Mediation: The City contracts with Inland Mediation Board for Landlord/Tenant
dispute mediation services. Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is located at 1005 Begonia
Avenue, Ontario, CA 91762.
House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe,
self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at-risk of homelessness.
Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24-hour crisis
intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs.
House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711.
Pomona Valley Council of Churches - West End Hunqer Proqram ("SOVA"): SOVA offers a 5-day
food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health
and avoid homelesshess by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The PVCC
offers the West End Hunger Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA
91761.
YWCA - Y-Teen: Provide personal development and societal betterment after-school activities to
low- and low-moderate income youth at-risk in a nurturing environment as alternatives and
diversions from health threatening and risk-taking behaviors. This program is run at the Alta Loma
Junior High located at 9000 Lemon Street. YWCA of the West End is located at 600 North Park
Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768.
YMCA - West End Kids Club: Offered to students from low-income families attending Bear Gulch
School. This activity provides an after-school recreational program. West End YMCA is located at
9017 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.
YMCA - Your Own Club: The program is run at the Old Town Park and the Villa Del Norte
community room and targeted to the Northtown neighborhood in CT 21, BG 6 & 7. The program is
16
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
designed to provide at-risk middle school aged youth with fun, educationally enriching and
challenging value-based after school alternatives in a safe and enjoyable environment. Rancho
Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite
106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition Proqram: The nutrition program is run from the Senior
Center in which 22,500 hot meals would be provided at the RC Senior Center and 16,250 meals
prepared for home delivery. Oldtimers Foundation is located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA
92335.
Rancho Cucamonqa Public Library - Back To Basics: The Back to Basic program trains volunteer
tutors to work with 7 to 12-year old children identified by school personnel as at-risk (challenged
economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. The
Rancho Cucamonga Public Library is located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
91730.
YMCA - Senior Transportation: Provide transportation for senior citizens to and from the Rancho
Cucamonga Senior Center, as well as local grocery stores, for weekly shopping. Rancho
Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West End YMCA, is located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite
106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.
Campfire Boys and Girls: Camp Nawakwa is located in the Barton Flats recreation area of the San
Bernardino Mountains. The program provides a 5-day resident camp session to leam responsibility,
develop skills, and gain confidence in themselves while building independence and self-reliance.
Campfire Boys and Girls is located at 4959 Palo Verde Street, Suite 208C, Montclair, CA 91763.
Project Sister: Project Sister is a sexual assault and violence prevention program. The program
works with teens addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and personal safety awareness. The
program also targets seniors, who are vulnerable to being victims of cdmes including sexual assault,
robbery, burglary, and financial exploitation. The program offers 24-hour counseling, and individual
and group counseling as needed. Project Sister is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA
91711.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
17
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Resources: CDBG funds: · Fair Housing: $12,000.
· Landlord/Tenant Mediation: $10,000
· House of Ruth: $7,600.
· SOVA: $7,000.
· YVVCA: $7,000.
· YMCA - West End Kids Club: $6,000.
· YMCA - Your Own Club: $5,000.
· Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition: $8,500.
· Back To Basics: $10,000.
· YMCA - Senior Transportation: $15,000.
· Campfire Boys and Girls: $6,700.
· Project Sister: $9,700.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, assist the following: · Fair Housing - 388 persons.
· Landlord/Tenant - 228 households.
· House of Ruth - 1,600 persons.
· SOVA- 1,258 persons.
· YVVCA - 60 youth.
· YMCA - West End Kids Club - 95 youth.
· YMCA - Your Own Club - 40 youth.
· Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition - 570 seniors.
· Back To Basics - 132 persons.
· YMCA - Senior Transportation - 3,700 seniors.
· Campfire Boys and Girls - 20 youth.
· Project Sister - 980 persons.
OBJECTIVE 12: ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
STRUCTURES.
Program 12.1: Installation of handicap wheelchair ramps at all curb returns.
Activity 12.1.1: This program involves the retrofitring of existing curbs to accommodate
disabled individuals.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $24,000 (includes $2,016.79 in prior year funding of this activity).
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, provide approximately 2,880 square feet of
curbing for handicap ramps.
18
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Program 12.2: Complete handicap accessibility requirements at other eligible public
recreation facilities, including Old Town Park.
Activity 12.2.1: This project will provide the renovation of the existing Old Town Park for
Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") compliance. Improvements will
include tot lot equipment replacement and installation of resilient surfacing to
allow for use by physically challenged individuals, in addition to any restroom
refurbishment determined necessary, signage, and provisions for an
accessible route. Old Town Park is located on the south side of Feron
Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division.
Geographic Location: Old Town Park is located in CT 21, BG 6.
Resources: CDBG funds: $174,000.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, complete improvements for compliance
with ADA requirements.
OBJECTIVE 13: THE RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION OF PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL
VALUE FOR HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, AND AESTHETIC REASONS.
Program 13.1: The rehabilitation of significant historic structures, with primary
emphasis on residential assistance.
Activity 13.1.1: The City previously funded the restoration and historic preservation of the
Isle House during the 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 program years. Remaining
activities include selective demolition and modifications to secure the
structure from the environment and halt the physical effects of deterioration
on the structure's exterior. Historic restoration will include: rehabilitation,
framing, repairing exterior siding, painting, dry walling, plumbing, and
electrical. This is a multi-year program and will be completed through a
cooperative effort between the City and the Etiwanda Historical Society.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: The Isle House was previously located at the northwest corner of Highland
Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, within the right-of-way for the future Foothill Freeway, which is
currently under construction. The structure was moved to its permanent site and foundation and site
improvements were completed during the 2000-2001 program year. The Isle House is located at
7086 Etiwanda Avenue.
Resources: CDBG funds: $131,288.58 (including $46,288.58 in prior year funds, $15,000.00
reprogrammed from FY 99/00, Rancheria Drive, Acct. 1216, and $70,000.00 in new funds).
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, complete all administrative and program
19
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds.
OBJECTIVE14: PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT THE CDBG PROGRAM AND THE
CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
Program 14.1: Provide forthe necessary planning and administrative activities of the
CDBG program.
Activity 14.1.1: Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program
applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area
studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this pregrem occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds: $155,000.00.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, complete all administrative and program
management oversight to ensure efficient and effective use of CDBG funds.
OBJECTIVE 15: ALLEVIATE ' PHYSICAL AND RELATED ECONOMIC DISTRESS
THROUGH THE STIMULATION OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND
COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION IN IDENTIFIED TARGET
NEIGHBORHOODS.
Program 15.1: Support housing and Community Development activities that stimulate
economic development.
Activity 15.1.1: Review and Evaluation of Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard, west of
Haven Avenue is older with mixed uses and appears to be reaching stages
of economic distress, while the area east of Haven Avenue has pdmadly new
development and vacant land. The concern is with revitalization of the older
areas and planning land use to ensure effective and balanced growth along
Foothill Boulevard. The City has formed a task force to review the planning
and land use issues along Foothill Boulevard.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: Approximately 6 miles from Grove Avenue to East Avenue.
Resources: City General Fund.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, continue an analysis of Foothill Boulevard
with recommendations regarding revitalization and land use.
2O
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
OBJECTIVE t6: REVITALIZE AND UPGRADE HOUSING CONDITIONS; PREVENT AND
ELIMINATE BLIGHT AND BLIGHTING INFLUENCES; AND ELIMINATE
CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND
WELFARE.
Program 16.1: Continue improvements to residential energy efficiency, lead-based
paint hazard reduction, and code enforcementthrough the City's Home
Improvement Program.
Activity 16.1.1: The City currently funds a Home Improvement Program in which, through the
course of that activity, the rehabilitation improvements mentioned previously
would be completed. A separate activity will not be developed.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.
Geographic Location: The benefits of this program occur citywide.
Resources: CDBG funds.
Accomplishments and Time Frame: Activity accomplishments occur through the Home
Improvement Program. (See Objective 5, Program 5.1, Activity 5.1.1 .)
Program 16.2: Continue funding the Graffiti Removal Program.
Activity 16.2.1: City crews operate in lower income target neighborhoods to remove incidents
of graffiti.
Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division.
Geographic Location: Available in all eligible target neighborhoods including CT 21, BG 2, 3, 6,
and 7, and CT 20.01, BG 4.
Resources: CDBG funds: $22,000 (includes $2,797.72 in prior year funding of this activity).
Accomplishments and Time Frame: By June 30, 2002, remove approximately 14,999 square feet
of graffiti.
OTHER ACTIONS
· ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan for 2000-2005 includes a section on
"Commercial/Industrial Economic Enhancement Programs." The objective of that program is to
strengthen the economic environment of the commercial/Industrial sector of the Redevelopment
project area. This is accomplished through a variety of programs designed to address the needs of
Rancho Cucamonga's existing businesses, to attract new businesses to the City, and provide long-
term employment to strengthen and compliment the economy of the City.
21
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Economic development goals focus on job creation, improving the quality of life to residents
and businesses, increasing the City's tax base, and providing opportunities for public and pdvate
partnerships, including private investment in the community. Economic development activities focus
on two basic efforts: business retention and business attraction. Currently, the Redevelopment
Agency has successfully implemented a vadety of marketing and promotion strategies suggested in
the strategic plan that have leveraged the community's attributes as well as establishing a positive
business related image. Through a comprehensive plan of advertisement campaigns, direct mail of
newsletters, site selection information, trade shows, publishing editorials, press releases, and
Intemet web page, the City has managed to receive local, regional, and even national recognition.
Despite this success and recognition, the Redevelopment Agency continues to work to attract
businesses that fit the general business environment of the City and achieve a greater presence in
the area. The City will continue with these economic development efforts dudng the 2001-2002
program year.
The Redevelopment Agency's marketing and promotion efforts have significantly affected
employment, expansion, and the local tax base. From 1994-1999, more that 47 companies
expanded and/or relocated as a result of the Agency's marketing and promotion efforts.
Simultaneously, these companies increased their employment opportunities and created additional
economic activity. Although the City's success in economic development is not a direct result of the
Agency's marketing and promotional efforts, the Agency has managed to facilitate that growth.
Apart from the specifics of the Economic Development strategy, the Agency assists
companies through participation in the following programs. The Inland Empire Small Business
Development Center ("SBDC"), which offers a variety of resources to improve business operation
including, business consulting, seminars and workshops, information resources, procurement
assistance, environmental assistance, and a variety of other programs. The California Statewide
Communities Development Authority (California Communities) specializes in issuing tax-exempt
financing for public agencies and eligible private agencies for industrial, housing, non-profit and
other tax-exempt facilities. These programs assist local agencies to achieve economic, financial,
and social goals.
The California Association for Local Economic Development ("CALED") awarded the
Redevelopment Agency its "CALED 1998 Award of Excellence" for the economic strategies of the
Implementation Plan. And, the California Redevelopment Association ("CRA") awarded the
Redevelopment Agency its "2000 CRA Award of Excellence" in recognition of the projects and
programs that made an exemplary contribution to the redevelopmerit process and resulted in the
betterment of their community.
· AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING
In 1984, the City began contracting with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board
("IFHMB") to provide for the education and enforcement of state and federal housing laws for all
residents who request assistance. Having the IFHMB administer the Fair Housing Program assures
that there are no impediments to fair housing choices. The IFHMB provides public education,
mediation, counseling, testing, and legal referral services to promote fair housing.
In May 1996, the City completed a five-year Fair Housing Impediments Analysis (a summary
22
?/
Community Development Block Grant 200t-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
of the Impediments Analysis is attached as Appendix "B"). The 2000-2004 Consolidated Plan
identified that the Fair Housing Impediments Analysis would be revised during the 2000-2001
program year, however this was not accomplished. To meet our obligations established in the
Consolidated Plan, and any statutory requirements for updating the impediments to fair housing, the
Fair Housing Impediments Analysis will be updated during the 2001-2002 program year.
The existing Fair Housing Impediments Analysis established the following strategies as
areas where the contracted Fair Housing provider should intensify program efforts.
1. Educaterentalpropertyownersandmanagersontheirresponsibilitiesunderfairhousing
laws including educational course, newsletters, and workshops.
2. Target the renting population through an ongoing fair housing educational program
including public workshops, high school studentJparent groups, and adult education.
The IFHMB provides quarterly Fair Housing newsletters that are circulated to apartment
owners and renters throughout San Bernardino County, and specifically within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. They also conduct Fair Housing workshops to educate the public on their
responsibilities under Fair Housing laws.
3, Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, monitor lending practices of major lenders
within the City. Track the same lenders Community Reinvestment commitment to
improve the City's housing.
The IFHMB monitors the lending activities of various banking institutions in the community by
tracking lending practices to different ethnic groups and census tracts. The analysis of lending
activity is submitted in compliance with the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis allowing for an
analysis of each banking institution's activity.
4. Accomplish media outreach by feature articles and paid ads in local newspapers, radio
announcements used for public spots, regular periodic radio programs in Spanish, and
providing information to the Community Billboard, in addition to live interviews provided
in certain communities.
The media outreach program for the dissemination of Fair Housing information is
accomplished through airtime on the following radio and television stations: KDIF, KVCR, KNSE,
KMIA, KVVRN, KVVRM, KXSB, and KXRS.
5. Network with both federal and state Fair Housing Departments and other related
services to assist the complainant.
6. NetworkwiththeAssociationofRealtorsandtheApartmentRentalOwnersAssociation
as technical advisor.
Outreach brochures regarding Fair Housing issues and upcoming workshops are provided to
community agencies located within the City.
7. Mediate/reconcile complaints of discrimination. Assist complainants in filing charges
with enforcement agencies.
23
Community Development Block Grant 2001~2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
The Fair Housing program assists low- and low-moderate income persons regarding
complaints that require counseling. These complaints include issues of race, color, national origin,
familial status, religion, sex, madtal status, and disability.
8. Promote April as fair housing month with government municipalities, housing industry,
and the general public.
The City works with the IFHMB to promote April as "Fair Housing Month."
9. Monitor newspapers for classified advertising that is written in such a way as to
discriminate against certain groups in housing.
10. Make recommendations to local governments and review components of any local
housing related plan.
11. Provide assistance and network with the County of San Bemardino Housing Authority for
the Section 8 certificate and voucher program.
The IFHMB conducts these activities on an ongoing basis.
Fair Housing education is provided as a major component of the program with a goal of
providing the knowledge of what is Fair Housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing
outreach is provided through radio programming, mass media, brochures, and the IFHMB web site
(http://hometown.aol.com/inmedbd/index.html). Fair housing enforcement is provided through the
process of mediation through the IFHMB or related enforcement agency. And finally, Fair Housing
testing is used as a tool to gather evidence of discri mi nation. The Fair Housing program attempts to
accomplish the primary objectives of the City's Fair Housing Impediments Analysis by providing for
the education, counseling, mediation, testing, and legal referral of Fair Housing issues within the
community.
· OBSTACLES TO MEETING UNDER-SERVED NEEDS
The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under-served needs is a lack of available
resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is
to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form
public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to
better leverage available funding.
· ACTIONS TO FOSTER AND MAINTAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING
A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are
specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock.
Activities such as new construction, conservation of at-risk units, and preservation of existing units
are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock.
24
Community De~eloprnent Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucarnonga
· ACTIONS TO REMOVE BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
There were no significant barriers to affordable housing identified that would need to be
revised or amended. All regulations and policies currently in-place are necassary in order to
maintain the public health, safety, and welfare.
· ACTIONS TO EVALUATE AND REDUCE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS
In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement
federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program
utilizing CDBG funds, all owners, and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-
based paint. Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of
seven, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated
blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. It is also
recommended that housing rehabilitation efforts carried out by the Redevelopment Agency also
follow the same guidelines.
· ACTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POVERTY LEVEL FAMILIES
The City has relatively little control over the many factors that may affect the determination of
an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utilized by the City is the support of
public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs,
which includes mostof the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. Most ofthe activities funded
by the City, particularly those related to non-housing community development, act indirectly to
increase economic development in the City. The City, through i~ CDBG contract activities, complies
with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low-income individuals.
From a housing perspective, all of the pdorities, objectives, and programs aimed at
increasing affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest
income categories.
· ACTIONS TO DEVELOP INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND ENHANCE COORDINATION
The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be
taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward
this is increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program
efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also
contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness.
The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing
Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the
west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided.
25
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
· PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS
Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the
Housing Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and
objectives of the Consolidated Plan.
· MONITORING
Monitoring serves as an effective tool to ensure that federal funds are spent in a manner
consistent with the CDBG National Objectives and that the programs and projects are achieving
stated goals. The following outlines basic monitoring requirements that are followed in the
implementation of the CDBG program.
Standards Utilized for Review · Is the program meeting intended objectives?
· Is the agency capable of tracking and/or documenting necessary benefit information and
carrying out the responsibilities of its program consistent with federal requirements?
· Is appropdate and accurate documentation submitted in a timely manner?.
Monitodnq Procedures
Construction Projects - All construction projects are expected to comply with federal labor
and procurement procedures as well as the various affirmative action and equal opportunity
requirements required by various federal and state laws. To ensure this end, CDBG staff developed
a Procurement and Contract Compliance Manual that outlines the various procedures and steps
required as part of contract management. The CDBG coordinator oversees and reviews contract
preparation at each step from bid preparation, contract document preparation, pre-construction
meetings, and ongoing project inspections.
SubrecipientAgencies - All Subrecipient agencies must sign a contract with the City in which
the various scope of work, time line, and documentation requirements are outlined. On a monthly
basis, each Subrecipient must submit detailed information regarding the number, ethnicity, and
income level of individuals benefiting with CDBG funds. Quarterly summary reports are required of
some agencies in which further information is provided on activities accomplished in that quarter.
The City conducts an on-site inspection of each agency at least once a year, preferably toward the
end of the funding cycle.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
The preparation of a representative and useful Annual Action Plan is the result of an
effective citizen participation process. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages and solicits the
participation of its residents in accordance with the provisions of its Citizen Participation Plan. The
following steps were taken to ensure adequate public participation.
1. A public notice of available funds and soliciting project applications was published on
October 23, 2000, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. Copies of the notice
were also mailed to approximately 47 individuals and organizations. Copies of the notice
were posted at City Hall, City Library, Senior Center, and Lion's Center.
26
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
2. Apublicnoticeregardingtheavailabilityofthedraft2001-2002AnnualActionPlanand
notice of the public hearing was published on February 21, 2001, in the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin and February 22, 2001, in the La Voz newspapers, providing for a 30-day
review period. Letters indicating document availability were mailed to surrounding
jurisdictions, the County of San Bernardino, and the Housing Authority of San
Bemardino County. Copies of the notice were posted at City Hall, Rancho Cucamonga
Senior Center, Lion's Park Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public
Library. The public hearing was held on March 21,2001.
3. A public notice regarding the availability of the 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan and notice
of the public hearing was published on April 2, 2001, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
and April 5, 2001, in the La Voz newspapers, providing for a 30-day review period.
Letters indicating document availability were mailed to surrounding jurisdictions, the
County of San Bemardino, and the Housing Authority of San Bemardino County. Copies
of the notice were posted at City Hall, Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, Lion's Park
Community Center, and the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. The public headng was
held on May 2, 2001.
27
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
APPENDIX "A" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FY 2001-2002 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
· PURPOSE OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN
The Consol idated Plan is a comprehensive 5-year strategy that addresses the use of federal
grantJentitlement funds, such as CDBG funds, for the purpose of meeting the goal of providing
decent housing, suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities principally for
persons of low- and moderate-income.
· PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
The Annual Action Plan identifies specific projects consistent with the Consolidated Plan 5-
year strategy listing the projects, programs, and resources that will be utilized dudng the program
year. Dudng fiscal year 2001-2002, the City will receive $1,001,000 in new CDBG funds, and
reprogram $177,361.16 from previous program years, providing $1,178,361.16 available for funding
program activities. The sum of all CDBG funds available total $1,416,826.14, which includes
$238,464.98 in prior year program funds remaining in their designated programs. These funds will
be used to support the following housing and community development activities.
Reprogram Allocation
Administration
CDBG Administration Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division $0,00 $155,000,00 $155,000,00
s0.0o s155,000.oo $ 6s,ooo.0o
Capital Improvement Proiects
Calle Vejar (Design) Rancho Cucarnonga Engineering Division $0.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00:
RCSC Landscaping (Des) Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $30,000.00 $0.00 $30,000.00
Sidewalk Gdnding Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $13,718.46 $10,281.54 $24,000.00
Wheelchair Ramps Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $2,016.79 $21,983.21 $24,000.00
Old Town Park Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $0.00 $174,000.00 $174,000.00
New RCSC (Design) Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $17,868.62 $126,125.51 $143,994.13
New RCSC (Const.) Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $144.492.54 $5,507.46 $150,000.00
Isle House Randno Cucamonga Planning Division $61,288.58 $70,000.00 $131,288.58
~~ $269,384.99 $442,897.72 $712,282.71
Home Improvement Pronram
Home Improvement Randno Cucamonga Planning Division $143,643.43 $250,000.00 $393,643.43
Home Maintenance Oldtimers Foundation $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
~ ~ _ $143,643.43 $260,000.00 $403,643.43
Public Services
Graffiti Removal Randno Cucamonga Engineering Division $2,797.72 $19,202.28 $22,000.00
Fair Housing Inland Mediation Board $0.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
LandlordFFenant Inland Mediation Board $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Ouh*eadn Center HOPE $0.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00
A-1
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Project Name Implementing Agency prior Year I FY 2001/2002 Total Available
Reprogram Nlocation
Emergency Shelter Foothill Family Shelter $0.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
Emergency Shelter House of Ruth $0.00 $7,600.00 $7,600.00
Food Distribution SOVA $0.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
Y-Teen Program YWCA $0.00 $7,000.00 $7.000.00
Youth Activity YMCA - West End Kids Club $0.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
Youth Activity YMCA - Your Own Club $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Senior Programs Rancho Cucamonga Community Services $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Food Distribution Oldtimers Foundation $0.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00
Literacy Rancho Cucamonga Public Library $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Senior Transportation West End YMCA $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Youth Activity Campfire Boys & Gids $0.00 $6,700.00 $6,700.00
' Project Sister $0.00 $9,700.00 $9,700.00
$2,797.7__2 $t43,102.28 $145,900.00
$415,826.1.__..____~_4 $1,001,000.00 $1,416,828.1~4
A-2
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucatnonga
APPENDIX "B" - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING
A literature search was conducted in several areas; housing discrimination, City of Rancho
Cucamonga Housing Element, the Grantee Performance Report 1994-1995, federal and state fair
housing laws, area demographics, national, state and local housing policies, public housing, 1990
census data, historicel racial housing problems in renting and real estate purchases, zoning and
discrimination correlation.
Surveys were used to accumulate the database. These surveys were formulated to gather
information on housing discrimination, fair housing knowledge, quality of the present housing and
other information that could help housing policy makers to identify problem areas.
1. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act ("HMDA") data was requested from eight lenders.
2. Eight lenders showed activity within the City.
3. Interviews were completed with tenants, property management, owners, and Realtors.
4. CDBG City staff, County ofSan Bernardino Housing Authority, California DePartmentof
Fair Employment, and the HUD Fair Housing Division contributed additional information
and statistical data.
FINDINGS
The data compilation identified the following major findings:
1. Discrimination Issues
· Lack of understanding fair housing laws/differential treatment.
· Unequal terms/differential treatment.
· Buyer refusal.
· Lenders HMDA data tracking.
· Tracking lender's housing loans.
2. Housing Issues
· Affordable housing (both rental and for purchase).
· Neighborhood safety.
· Housing and rental deterioration in neighborhoods.
· Transportation.
· Good schools.
FAIR HOUSING ACTION PLAN
The following plan of action outlines strategies reflecting the survey findings. Workable
objectives have been identified in Rancho Cucamonga's Impediments to Fair Housing. The City's
contracted Fair Housing provider needs to intensify efforts in the following areas:
1. Educate rental property owners and managers on their responsibilities under the fair
housing laws:
· Educational courses.
· Newsletters.
· Workshops.
B-1
Community Development B/ock Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
2. Target the renting population through an ongoing fair housing educational program:
· Public workshops.
· High school students/parents group.
· Adult education.
3. Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, monitor lending practices of major lenders
within the City. Track the same lenders Community Reinvestment commitment to
improve the City's housing.
4. Accomplish media outreach by:
· Feature articles and paid ads in local newspapers.
· Radio announcements used for public spots.
· Regular periodic radio programs in Spanish.
· Provide information to the Community Billboard, in addition to live interviews
provided in certain communities.
5. Network with both federal and state Fair Housing Departments and other related
services to assist the complainant.
6. NetworkwiththeAssociationofRealtorsandtheApartmentRentalOwnersAssociation
as technical advisor.
7. Mediate and reconcile complaints of discrimination.
8. Assist complainants in filing charges with enforcement agencies.
9. Promote Apdl as fair housing month with government municipalities, housing industry,
and the general public.
10. Monitor newspapers for classified advertising that is wdtten in such a way as to
discriminate against certain groups in housing.
11. Make recommendations to local governments and review components of any local
housing related plan.
12. Provide assistance and network with the County of San Bernard ino Housing Authority for
the Section 8 certificate and voucher program.
CITY PROGRAM
The City retains the responsibility of establishing the direction, providing a yeady monitor and
evaluating the performance of these vadous functions.
1. Maintenance and preservation of housing rehabilitation of the City's substandard
housing.
· Aggressive marketing of rehabilitation money to rental and homeowners.
· Housing task force to identify areas needing property revitalization.
B-2
Comrnunit~ Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
Cit~ of Rancho Cucarnonga
APPENDIX "C" - SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5-YEAR AND 1 -YEAR GOALS
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
5-'fear 00-0'1 00-01 01-02 014)2 02.03 02.03 03-04 03-04 04-05 Total Total
Program Goal Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Goal Actual
Availability
1.1 MF 200 50- 49
150
1.2 SF 8 4 3
2.1 MF 100 0 0
2.2 SF 15 5 6
Affordability
3.1' 170 170 170
3.2 30 6 6
4.1 150 30 5
4.2 20 4 4
4,3 8 8 9
preservation
5,1 200 40 40
5.2 5 0 0
6.1' 16 16 16
* These figures are not CUmulative.
OBJECTIVE 1: CONSERVATION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-
FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK,
Program 1,1: Acquisition of existing multipie-family units to be held for future affordable
housing.
Program 1,2: Acquisition and rehabilitation of existing single-family homes.
OBJECTIVE 2: IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL LOW- AND
MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE
PRODUCTION OF LARGER (3+ BEDROOM) RENTAL UNITS.
Program 2.1: Construction of affordable multi-family units.
Program 2.2: Construction of single-family infill development in low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods.
OBJECTIVE 3: PROVIDE DIRECT RENTER ASSISTANCE TO LOW- AND MODERATE-
INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN OR RETAIN
PERMANENT HOUSING.
Program 3.1: Support applications by the Housing Authority of San Bernardino County for
Section 8 and public housing assistance.
Program 3.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Tenant Based Assistance (TBA)
program.
C-1
Comrnunity Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
OBJECTIVE 4: INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-
INCOME HOME OWNERSHIP, PARTICULARLY THROUGH HOMEBUYER
ASSISTANCE.
Program 4.1: Administer a City sponsored Home Buyer Program.
Program 4.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Homeownership Assistance
Program (HAP) for eligible first-time homebuyers.
Program 4.3: NHDC First-Time Home Buyer program.
OBJECTIVE5: REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING HOUSING STOCK WITH
EMPHASIS ON OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING.
Program 5.1: Provide moderate rehabilitation of owner occupied, single-family and mobile
homes for extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income homeowners.
Program 5.2: Participate in the County HOME Consortium Rental Rehabilitation Program.
OBJECTIVE 6: IMPROVE LIVING CONDITIONS FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME
HOUSEHOLDS.
Program6.1: Support applications of the Housing Authority for their annual
Comprehensive Grant to improve living conditions for public housing
residents.
C-2
Community Development Block Grant 2001-2002 Annual Action Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga
APPENDIX "D" - ATTACHMENTS
SUPPORTING MAPS; PROPOSED PROJECTS, POINTS OF INTEREST, CENSUS BOUNDARIES, LOW-MOD
INCOME, ETHNICITY, AND UNEMPLOYMENT
SUPPORTING FORMS; FUNDING SOURCES, CONTINUUM OF CARE GAPS ANALYSIS, SPECIAL
NEEDS/NON-HOMELESS, HOUSING NEEDS, AND COMMUNITY NEEDS
LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJECTS
CERTIFICATIONS
D-1
_.i' '! ,, "1 , ,- ,,..,,-'--., I \
. s , .....~'-'-.- .........:"' -.-" i"i! ......:.~
· t ! ....../,.,' ~/
s..:--.-..'..-L :~ .:-- .-!::! ~:':;-~12"~j; ::; iI!,'~:;-':~~! ii;i"/'
."" i ,.'-'-i .;.
ilO-HEIGHT8: L-L
1'7.,i: ':'_. ;_....; .... !,,,,.,.. ,.., .... ....:';=-:-,,,.~:-~-:-,,;~: i r'~.:-; ,. _!._,,-'(,/i
'--'J t ""
:': :~ '~i;t .--.c.':.'.~ ,.!..'~C:;-!:~-~':i~,.,.:;:~' .'i':" :-:-.
'~,~:i;,:"":~/ ....... , "-I;,~i~i:;~',,:'i!L;'~.": ~...r.;=
~ -, ,L _. II.; ....... ;!~.' Streets
!i~' .":lcensu$ Place
_'i.; ~:!7~:_',~',~;' ":>"'"! SidmlkGrinc~ "~ .! ~) HUDOf~aes
=; · Proposed Projeers
~ , Proposed Projects
.;;"~'.: :;; ......q!;:': .......,~.:;.,,;'. ...... ,.LZ!o
--; -- - i ...... ..1 Eoo~omio Development
'L 7'" ~7 '7 I '/'! I' T./: I;L i fi Homeless & HIVIAID$ Programs
!_q_./'!' ~ ,,'
~;'~"-" ............r",;':' ..............ih'--
~ I ':F ! , ., I Is · Infrastructure
· Other
I' I .,.: , s v Planning ~nd Mministretlen
I j- I '---,--i j ! .~ Public; FaCilities
:~' I , ] [] PUbliC Services
, r
,--. ! = ~ Senior Programs
, Youth Programs
,,,, ,~ ~ ' 2000-200 COnsolidited Plan . .
r'i
L~ ~:.,~I3 ~ ~-. ~ / .... ,. ~ .~!/~_~/...
- . ~ . ~ ~ _
:, :F::~::: ~2-~ ~:~ ....'~' ....... ~ .........
ZZ}__~ L. ;~' ~~ Amed,n In~l,n/E,klmo
~ ~ ~ Asian(Paci~c islander
, _ ~ ~ ~ _ __ .~ ~ . Miles
~ 2000-20~ Consolld9ted Plan
,
.U,empioyment
I ' Map Layers
\ .ITT.';city Sound~ry
3e~eUl, Tract
~,~eaock Group
BloCk Group Cha~ Theme
lo~o
25~
) Pobuietlo~.,
~ Unemploye
2~00-20~ Con~oll ~ted Plan
r
I
Funding Sources
Entitlement Grant (includes reallocated funds)
CDBG $1,001,000
ESG $0
HOME $0
HOPWA $0
Total $1,001,000
Prior Years' Program Income NOT previously programmed or reported
CDBG $0
ESG $0
HOME $0
HOPWA $0
Total $0
Reprogrammed Prior Years' Funds
CDBG $385,826
ESG $0
HOME $0
HOPWA $0
Total $385,826
Total Estimated Program Income $0
Section 108'Loan Guarantee Fund $0
TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $1,386,826
Other Funds $0
Submitted Proposed Projects Totals $1,386,826
Un-Submitted Proposed Projects Totals $0
Continuum of Care: Gaps Analysis - Individuals
-- Beds/Units
Estimated Current Unmet Need/ Relative
Needs Inventory Gap Priority
Emergency ShelterF2F"I~'1 I'~'1~
Transitional Housing I0 I I0 I 11 ] ~ I
Permanent Housing 11 I 11 1 F~ I [Low I
Total 20 10 10
-- Estimated Supportive Services Slots
Job Trai.ing rI11'I['o"1~
case Management 11 1 1'0' 1 10 I ~
Substance Abuse Treatment Ii 1 Io I Io I I None I
Mental Health Care 11 1 l'0""1 Io I J None I
Housing Placement 11 1 I'o"] Io I ~
Lite Skills Training 11"'1 IT'] Io I ~
-- Estimated Sub-Populations
Chronic Substance Abusers ~ ~ 31i' ~
Seriously Mentally III 01i' I 011' ] 10__ [None J
Dually-Diagnosed I1''] 10 I 10 I1T6hi"l
Veterans I0 I 10__1 10 ~
Persons with .IV/AIDS 11'1 11 I 11 ~
Victims of Domestic Violence 10l I0 ] 11 ~
Youth Io__J Io I 11 ~
Other Categories
Asked To Leave By Roommates I'4''I 11 I i'4 1 ITn'dh"l
Job Loss 13 I Ii I 11 1 ITriih"l
Unable To Pay Rent/Utilities 17 I IO__J 17 I ~
Continuum of Care: Gaps Analysis - Persons in Families with Children
-- Beds/Units
Estimated Current Unmet Need/ Relative
Needs Inventory Gap Priority
Emergency Shelter ~ ] 13 I 13 I
Transitional Housing I'o''] I0 I ~
Permanent Housing [~"1 10 I ~ ]
Total 6 3 3
-- Estimated Supportive Services Slots
Job Training ~ I0 I0 I [ None
Case Management I o I o I o I I None
Child Care I"d' i'd ['0"1
Substance Abuse Treatment Io ~ I'0"]
Mental Health Care 10 ~ I'O'~]
Housing Placement ~ I''d I0 I ~ None
Life Skills Training ~ I0 I0 I IN°ne
-- Estimated Sub-Populations
Chronic Substance Abusers ~'1 r°"l 13
Seriously Mentally III [0 J [0 J r-~
Dually-Diagnosed [o J Io I ~ LN°ne J
veterans Io I 0['6' ] 10__ [None J
Persons with HIV/AIDS ~ ~ IO [None J
Victims of Domestic Violence I'd"] I0 I ~
Other Categories
Asked To Leave By Roommates ['4"] ~ I 1'4 1
JOb LOSS 13__1 I0 I 13 I
Unable To Pay Rent/Utilities [7 ] 10 I 17 J ~ 1
Special Needs/Non-Homeless
-- Sub-Populations
Priority Need Estimated $
Elderly ~ { $1,742,500
Frail Elderly ~ ] I$0
Severe Mental Illness IL°w I I$0
Developmentally Disabled ~ { $50,000
Physically Disabled ~ ] I $589t000
Persons with Alcohol/Other Drug Addiction ~ I $32,000
Persons with HIV/AIDS IL°w I I$0
TOTAL 1$2,413,500 }
Housing Needs
-- Renter
Need Level Units Estimated
Small Related 0 - 30% of MFI ~ ~ ] {$0
31- 50% of MFI ~ ['4'~1'1 150
51- 80% of MFI1Meal I 1791 I Iso
LargeRelated 0-30%ofMFI ~ ~ 150
31- 50% of MFI ~ ~ ISO
51- 80% of UFI ~ r'~"0~--i iso
Elderly 0-30%ofMFI ~ ~ I$o
31- 50% of MFI ~ 1133 I$0
51- 80% of MFI IMed I 1136 150
AllOther 0-30%ofMFI
31- 50% of MFI ~ [~1" 150 I
51-60%ofMB ~ L'B'e' Iso I
-- Owner
0-30%ofMFI ~ [T3"f'] 150 I
31- 50% of MFI ~ [975 ] IS0 I
51- 80% of MFI ~ ['}Tg"2'8"'J 150 I
Community Needs
-- Anti-Crime Programs
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall None 0 $0
Sub-Categories
Crime Awareness (051) None 0 $0
-- Economic Development
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall Low 0 $0
Sub-Categories
Rehab; Publicly or Privately-Owned Commer (14E) None 0 $0
CI Land Acquisition/Disposition (17A) None 0 $0
CI Infrastructure Development (17B) None 0 $0
CI Building Acquisition, Construction, Re (17C) None 0 $0
Other Commercial/Industrial Improvements (17D) None 0 $0
ED Direct Financial Assistance to For-Pro (18A) None 0 $0
ED Technical Assistance (18B) None 0 $0
Micro-Enterprise Assistance (18C) None 0 $0
-- Infrastructure
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall High 17 $1,690,800
Sub-Categories
Flood Drain Improvements (031) High I $380,000
Water/Sewer Improvements (03J) None 0 $0
Street Improvements (03K) High 2 $854,800
Sidewalks (03L) High 14 $456,000
Tree Planting (03N) None 0 $0
Removal of Architectural Barriers (10) None 0 $0
Privately Owned Utilities (11 ) None 0 $0
-- Planning & Administration
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall High 0 $0
Sub-Categories
Community Needs (Page 2)
-- Public Facilities
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall Med 1 $180,000
Sub-Categories
Public Facilities and Improvements (Gener (03) None 0 $0
Handicapped Centers (03B) None 0 $0
Neighborhood Facilities (03E) None 0 $0
Parks, Recreational Facilities (03F) Med I $180,000
Parking Facilities (03G) None 0 $0
Solid Waste Disposal Improvements (03H) None 0 $0
Fire Stations/Equipment (030) None 0 $0
Health Facilities (03P) None 0 $0
Asbestos Removal (03R) None 0 $0
Clean-up of Contaminated Sites (04A) None 0 $0
Interim Assistance (06) None 0 $0
Non-Residential Historic Preservation (16B) None 0 $0
-- Public Services
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall Med 26 $248,250
Sub-Categories
Public Services (General) (05) High 25 $232,000
Handicapped Services (05B) None 0 $0
Legal Services (05C) None 0 $0
Transportation Services (05E) None 0 $0
Substance Abuse Services (05F) None 0 $0
Employment Training (05H) None 0 $0
Health Services (05M) None 0 $0
Mental Health Services (050) None, 0 $0
Screening for Lead-Based Paint/Lead Hazar (05P) High 1 $16,250
-- Senior Programs
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall High 11 $1,817,500
Sub-Categories
Senior Centers (03A) High I $1,750,000
Senior Services (05A) High 10 $67,500
Community Needs (Page 3)
-- Youth Programs
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall Med 15 $90,000
Sub-Categories
Youth Centers (03D) None 0 $0
Child Care Centers (03M) None 0 $0
Abused and Neglected Children Facilities (03Q) None 0 $0
Youth Services (05D) High 15 $90,000
Child Care Services (05L) None 0 $0
Abused and Neglected Children (05N) None 0 $0
-- Other
Need Level Units Estimated $
Overall None 0 $0
Sub-Categories
Urban Renewal Completion (07) None 0 $0
CDBG Non-profitOrganization Capacity Bui (19C) None 0 $0
CDBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher E (19D) None 0 $0
Repayments of Section 108 Loan Principal (19F) None 0 $0
Unprogrammed Funds (22) None 0 $0
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0001 Oldtimers Foundation - Home Maintenance Program 14A Rehab; Single-Unit Residential CDBG $10,000
ESG $ 0
1033 Special Needs/Non-Homeless 570.202 HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide necessary rehabilitation services to special 70 People (General)
needs populations with emphasis on assisting the eldedy TOTAL $10,000
and frail elderly. Support service providers assisting
special needs populations.
Total Other Funding $ 0
Provision of minor and emergency repair grants to
seniors and low- or low-moderate income owner occupied
households, whose income falls below 80 percent of the
of the area median family income. Perr~itted home
repairs include minor plumbing, electrical, carpentry,
and roof repairs. The maximum grant permitted is $100
per visit, with a maximum of 2 visits per year per
household. This activity is provided by Oldtimers
Foundation, located at 8572 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA
92335. This activity receives program funding from a
vadety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 570.500(c)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0002 Wheelchair Ramps 03L Sidewalks CDBG $ 21,983
ESG $ 0
1017 Infrastructure 570.201(c) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 2880 Feet of Public Utilities
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderate-income Pdor Funding
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals, CDBG $ 2,017
seniors, and the handicapped.
TOTAL $ 24,000
Retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled
individuals. Total Other Funding $ 0
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(1 ) - Low / Mod Area
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0003 Sidewalk Gdnding 03L Sidewalks CDBG $10,282
ESEt $ O
1018 Infrastructure 570.201 (c) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ O
Provide improvements to public areas and public 3900 Feet of Public Utilities
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the Prior Funding
quality of life in low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals, CDBG $13,718
seniors, and the handicapped.
TOTAL $ 24,000
Involves the grinding, repair and/or replacement of
displaced sidewalks in qualified target neighborhoods, Total Other Funding $ 0
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(1 ) - Low / M od Area
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): CT & BG's
CT: 002001 BG: 4 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 2 County: 06071
CT: 002100 SG: 3 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 6 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 7 County: 06071
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
IProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0004 Graffitj Removal 05 Public Services (General) CDBG $19,202
ESG $ 0
1015 Public Services 570.201(e) HOME $0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 14999 Feet of Public Utilities
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income
persons and those with special needs, Prior Funding
CDBG $ 2,798
The removal of incidents of graffiid from public TOTAL $
properljes in identified target neighborhoods.
Total Other Funding $ 0
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help these with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Bigibility: 570.208(a)(1 ) - Low / Mod Area
Subrecipient: Local Govemment
Location(s): CT & BG's
CT: 002001 BG: 4 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 3 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 6 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 7 County: 06071
CT: 002100 BG: 2 County: 06071
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
I
0005 Fair Housing OEd Fair Housing Aotivities (if CDBG $12,000
CDBG, then subjeot to 15% oap) ESG $ 0
1229 Publio Services HOME $ 0
570.201 (e) HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agenoies that
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-inoome 388 People (General) TOTAL $12,000
persons and those with special needs.
Total Other Funding $ 0
Provision of fair housing services including education,
counseling, mediation, and legal referral. The 5-year
Consolidated Plan identifies that this program will
assist approximately 1,940 persons. This activity is
provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board,
located at 1005 Begonia Avenue, Ontado, CA 91762. This
activity receives program funding from a vatiety of
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570,208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Pdvate 570,E00(c)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0006 Landlord/Tenant Counseling 05K Tenant/Landlord Counseling CDBG $10,000
ESG $ 0
1023 Publio Services 570.201(e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 228 Households (General)
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income TOTAL $10,000
persons and those with special needs.
Total Other Funding $ 0
Provision of Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services.
The 6-year Consolidated Plan identifies that this
program will assist approximately 1,140 persons. This
activity is provided by Inland Fair Housing and
Mediation Board, located at 1005 Begonia Avenue,
Ontario, CA 91762. This activity receives program
funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: E70.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subreoipient Pdvate 570.500(0)
Looation(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0007 House of Ruth 05G Battered and Abused Spouses CDBG $ 7,600
ESG $ 0
1032 Public Services 570.201(e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 1600 People (General)
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income
persons and those with special needs. TOTAL $ 7,600
Total Other Funding $ 0
Advocates for and assists low- and low-moderate income
battered women by providing shelter, programs, education
and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy
living. The E-year Consolidated Plan identifies that
this program will assist approximately 8,000 persons.
This activity is provided by House of Ruth, P.O. Box
459, Claremont, CA 91711. This activity receives
program funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? Yes Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with H]V or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 570.500(0)
Location(s): Suppressed
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources I
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0008 Homeless Outreach, Programs, and Education (HOPE) 05 Public Services (General) CDBG $ 6,400
ESG $ 0
1031 Public Services 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 150 People (General)
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 6,400
pemons and those with special needs.
Total Other Funding $ 0
Provision of services to individuals and families who
are or are at-dsk of homelesshess. Services include
advocacy, education, and shelter vouchers. The E-year
Consolidated Plan identifies that this program will
assist approximately 750 persons. This activity is
provided by HOPE, located at 213 North Fern Avenue,
Ontario, CA 91762. This activity receives program
funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? Yes Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or ADDS? Yes Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrealpient Private 570.500(c)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0009 Pomona Valley Council of Churches-West End Hunger 05 Public Services (General) CDBG $ 7,000
Program ESG $ 0
1046 570,201 (el HOME $ 0
Public Services HOPWA $ 0
1280 People (General)
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that TOTAL $ 7,000
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income
persons and those with special needs.
Total Other Funding $ 0
Provision of a 5-day supply of food (16 meals) for all
members of a household, SOVA helps families maintain
their health and avoid homelessness by providing
emergency food assistance and support services, The 5-
year Consolidated Plan identifies that this program will
assist approximately 6,400 persons, This activity is
provided by Pomona Valley Council of Churches-West End
Hunger Program (SOVA), located at 635 South Taylor
Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. This activity receives
program funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? Yes Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? Yes Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570,208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 570.500(c)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
JProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0010 YWCA - Y-Teen 05D Youth Services CDBG $ 7,000
ESG $ 0
1064 Youth Programs 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 60 Youth
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 7,000
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and Total Other Funding $ 0
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures.
Provide personal development and societal betterment
after-school activities to low- and low-moderate income
youth at-dsk in a nurturing environment as alternatives
and diversions from health threatening behaviors. This
program is run at the Alta Loma Junior High School
campus located on Lemon Street, The E-year Consolidated
Plan identifies that this program will assist
approximately 240 youth. This activity is provided by
the YWCA of the West End, located at 600 North Park
Avenue, Pomona, CA91768. This activity receives
program funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 570.500(c)
Location(s): Addresses
9000 Lemon Street, Remcho C ucamonga, CA 91701
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0011 Administration 21A General Program Administration CDBG $155,000
ESG $ 0
1228 Planning & Administration 570,206 HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide the necessary planning and administrative 1 N/A
capacity to implement the CDBG program and the TOTAL $155,000
Consolidated Plan. Assist local public and non-profit
service agencies that improve the quality of life for
low- and moderate-income persons and those with special Total Other Funding $ 0
needs. The restoration and preservation of properties
of social value for historic, architectural, and
aesthetic reasons. Revitalize and upgrade housing
conditions, prevent and eliminate blight and blighting
influences, and to eliminate conditions detnmental to
the public health, safety, and welfare.
Program administration including coordination,
implementation, and monitoring of the City's CDBG
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility:
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): Oommunity Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
IProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0012 Home Improvement Program 14A Rehab; Single-Unit Residential CDBG $ 250,000
ESG $ 0
1230 Housing 570.202 HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Conselvation of the existing single family and multdple 40 Households (General)
family affordable housing stock. Improve access to
affordable housing for all low- and moderate-income Prior Funding
households, with emphasis on the production of larger CDBG $143,643
(3+ bedroom) rental units. Provide direct renter
assistance to extremely low- and low-income households
in order to obtain or retain permanent housing, TOTAL $ 393,643
Increase housing opportunities for low- and moderate-
income homeownership, particularly through first-time
homebuyerassistance. Rehabilitation of the exjsting Total Other Funding $0
housing stock with emphasis on owner-occupied housing.
Improve living conditions for low- and moderate-income
households.
Provides housing rehabilitation for owner occupied
single family and mobile home units. The program offers
deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants or
ernergenoy grants up to $7,500. Service is provided by
the City's Planning Division and Building and Safety
Division.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
12'
0013 Foothill Family Shelter 05 Public Services (General) CDBG $ 3,000
ESG $ O
1068 Publie Services 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 6 Households (General)
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 3,000
persons and those with special needs.
Total Other Funding $ 0
A 90-day transitional shelter for homeless families with
children. Support services are provided to enable
families to obtain independanee and penmanent housing.
The 5-year Consolidated Plan identifies that this
program will assist approximately 30 families. This
activity is provided by Foothill Family Sheget located
at 167 North Third Avenue, Suite K, Upland, CA 91786.
This aetivity receives program funding from a vadety of
sources.
Help the Homeless? Yes Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient P~vate 570.500(e)
Location(s): Addresses
230 North San Antonio Avenue, Upland, CA 91786
238 North San Antonio Avenue, Upland, CA 91786
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0014 YMCA - West End Kids Club 05D Youth Services CDBG $ 6,000
ESG $ 0
1069 Youth Programs 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 95 Youth
facilities to enh~.nce living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 6,000
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and Total Other Funding $ 0
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures,
Offered to students from low-income families attending
Bear Gulch School. The activity provides an after-
school recreational program. The 5-year Consolidated
Plan identifies that this program will assist
approximately 475 youth, This activity is provided by
the West End YMCA, located at 9017 Arrow Route, Rancho
Cucamonga, CA 91730. This activity receives program
funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Star Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Pdvate 570.600(c)
Location(s): Addresses
8355 Bear Gulch Place, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
....
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
JProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0015 Senior Citizen Services 05A SeniorServices CDBG $10,000
ESG $ 0
1110 Senior Programs 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 550 Eldedy
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderata-income TOTAL $10,000
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of Total Other Funding $ 0
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures.
Project will create affordable low-cost senior altizen
programs focusing on physical fitness and wellness,
recreational and educational development, and mental
health and emotional well being. This project includes
a $100 a month lease agreement with the Assistance
League of Upland to provide additional parking areas for
the Senior Center. This service is provide through the
City of Ranoho Cucamonga Community Services Department.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIVerAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570,208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): Addresses
9791 Arrow Highway, Ranoho Cucamonga, CA 91730
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Coderritle/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0016 YMCA - Your Own Club 05D Youth Sewices CDBG $ 5,000
ESG $ 0
1113 Youth Programs 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 40 Youth
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
qualib/of life in low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 5,000
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and Total Other Funding $ 0
non-profit sepvice agencies that improve the qualib/of
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures.
The program is targeted to the Northtown neighborhood,
CT 21, BG 6 & 7. The program is run at the Old Town
Park and the Villa Del Norte Community Room. The
program is designed to provide at-risk middle school
aged youth with fun, educational, enriching, and
challenging values-based after-school alternatives in a
safe and enjoyable environment. The 5-year Consolidated
Plan identifies that this program will assist
approximately 200 youth. This activity is provided by
the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of the West
End YMCA, located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite 106,
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. This activity receives
program funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Pdvate 570.500(e)
Location(s): Addresses
10033 Feron Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
9999 Feron Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
IProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0017 Oldtimers Foundation - Senior Nutrition 05A Senior Services CDBG $ 8,500
ESG $ 0
1183 Senior Programs 570.201 (e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 570 EIdedy
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 8,500
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of Total Other Funding $ 0
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures.
The nutrition program is run from the Rancho Cucamonga
Senior Center. There will be 22,500 hot meals provided
at the center and 16,250 meals prepared for home
deliveW. This activity is provided by Oldtimers
Foundation, located at 8572 Sierre, Avenue, Fontana, CA
92335. This activity receives program funding from a
variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 870.500(c)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
IProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0018 Back To Basics 05 Public Services (General) CDBG $10,000
ESG $ 0
1218 Public Services 570.201(e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 132 People (General)
improve the quality of life for low- and moderate-income TOTAL $10,000
persons and those with special needs.
Total Other Funding $ 0
This program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to
12 year old children identified by school pemennel as
at-dsk (challenged economically and educationally) and
who are reading and writing below their grade levels.
The 5-year Consolidated Plan identifies that this
program will assist approximately 500 persons. This
service is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Public
Library.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Public 570.500(e)
Location(s): Addresses
7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
lProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0019 Project Sister 05G Battered and Abused Spouses CDBG $ 9,700
ESG $ 0
13XX Public Services 570.201(e) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Assist local public and non-profit service agencies that 980 People (General)
improve the quality of life for low- and moderata-income
persons and these with special needs. TOTAL $ 9,700
Total Other Funding $ 0
Project Sister is a sexual assault and violence
prevention program. The program works with teens
addressing date rape, sexual harassment, and pemonal
se. fety awareness, The program also targets seniors, who
are vulnerable to being victims of climes including
sexual assault, robboW, burgulary, and financial
exploitation. The program offers 24-hour counseling,
and individual and group counseling as needed. This
activity is located at P.O. Box 1390, Claremont, CA
91711. This activity receives program funding from a
vadety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Bigibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low/Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Pdvate 570.500(c)
Location(s): Suppressed
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0020 Campfire Boys and Gids OSD Youth Services CDBG $ 6,700
ESG $ 0
13XX Youth Programs 570.201 (e) HeM E $ 0
He PWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 20 Youth
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderate-income TOTAL $ 6,700
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and Total Other Funding $ 0
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures.
Camp Nawakwa is located in the Barton Flats recreation
area of the San Samardino Mountains. The program
provides a 5-day resident camp session to learn
responsibility, develop skills, and gain confidence in
thenselves whild building independence and self-
reliance, This service is provided by Campfire Boys and
Girs, located at 4959 Pale Verde Street, Suite 208C,
Montelair, CA 91763. This activity receives program
funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 570.500(e)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0021 YMCA - Senior Transportation 05A Senior Services CDBG $15,000
ESG $ 0
13XX Senior Programs 570.201 (el HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public 3700 EldeHy
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the TOTAL $15,000
quality of life in low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and Total Other Funding $ 0
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of
lifo for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accesse~bility to all public
facilities and str~ctures.
Provide transportation for senior citizens to and from
the Rancho Cucarnonge. Senior Center, as well as local
grocery stores, for weekly shopping. This activity is
provided by Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA, a branch of
the West End YMCA, located at 10970 Arrow Route, Suite
106, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. This activity
receives program funding from a variety of sources.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Subrecipient Private 570.500(c)
Location(s): Community Wide
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources I
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0022 Calla Vejar 03K Street Improvements CDEG $ 35,000
ESG $ 0
1328 Infrastructure 570.201 (¢) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public I Feet of Public Utilities
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the TOTAL $ 35,000
quality of life in low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped. Total Other Funding $ 0
The design of project improvements to include the
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates.
The design will remove the existing pavement, construct
new pavement over aggregate base, install streetlights,
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ramps for disabled, and
street trees. When completed, the project will
facilitate better drainage of the street and right-of-
way.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV orAIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(1) - Low / Mod Area
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): CT & BG's
CT: 002100 BG: 2 County: 06071
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0023 Old Town Park 03F Parks, Recreational Facilities CDBG $174,000
ESG $ 0
1327 Public Facilities 570.201 (c) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public I Public Facilities
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the
quality of life in low- and moderate-income TOTAL $174,000
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals,
seniors, and the handicapped, Ensure accessability to Total Other Funding $ 0
all public facilities and structures.
This project will provide the renovation of the existing
Old Town Park for Americans with Disabilities Act
("ADA") compliance. Improvements will include tot lot
equipment replacement and installation of resilient
surfacing to allow for use by physically chailenged
individuals, in addition to any restroom refurbishment
determined necessary, signage, and provisions for an
accessible route, Old Town Park is located on the south
side of Felon Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570,208(a)(1 ) - Low / Mod Area
Subrecipient: Local Govemment
Location(s): CT & BG's
CT: 002100 BG: 6 County: 06071
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
IProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0024 New Rancho CucamonUa Senior Center (Design) 03A Senior Centers CDBG $126,125
ESG $ 0
1329 Senior Programs 570.201 (c) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public I Public Facilities
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the Prior Funding
quality of life in low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals, CDBG $17,869
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with TOTAL $143,994
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures. Total Other Funding $ 0
This is a multi-year project that includes funding for
both design and construction activities. This activity
will begin the design process that will provide a
conceptual master plan that can be used to plan and
promote the new Senior Center facility. Funds will be
banded for future construction activites. Funding for
this activity includes $17,869 of funds reprogrammed
from prior year programs.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): N/A
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
Project ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0025 New Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center (Construction) 03A Senior Centers CDBG $ 5,507
ESG $ 0
1330 Senior Programs 570.201 (c) HOME $ 0
HOPWA $ 0
Provide improvements to public areas and public I Public Facilities
facilities to enhance living environments, improve the Prior Funding
quality of life in low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, and for lower income individuals, CDBG $144,493
seniors, and the handicapped. Assist local public and
non-profit service agencies that improve the quality of TOTAL $150,000
life for low- and moderate-income persons and those with
special needs. Ensure accessability to all public
facilities and structures. Total Other Funding $ 0
This is a multi-year project that includes funding for
both design and construction activities. This activity
will begin the design process that will provide a
conceptual master plan that can be used to plan and
promote the new Senior Center facility. Funds will be
banked over several years for future construction
activities. Funding for this activity includes $144,493
of funds reprogrammed from pdor year programs.
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(a)(2) - Low / Mod Limited Clientele
Subrecipient: Loca~ Government
Location(s): N/A
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
CPD Consolidated Plan
Listing of Proposed Projects
IProject ID/ Project Title/Priority/ HUD Matrix Code/Title/ Funding Sources I
Local ID Objective/Description Citation/Accomplishments
0026 Isle House 16A Residential Histodc CDBG $ 70,000
Preservation ESG $ 0
1181 Other HOME $ 0
570.202(d) HOPWA $ 0
Revitalize and upgrade housing conditions, prevent and
eliminate blight and blighting influences, and eliminate I Public Facilities Prior Funding
conditions detrimental to the public health, safety, and
welfare, CDBG $ 61,289
The City previously funded the restoration and histadc TOTAL $131,289
preservation of the Isle House during the 1998-1999 and
1999-2000 program years. Remaining activities include
selective demolition and modifications to secure the Total Other Funding $ 0
structure's exterior, Histodc restoration will
include: rehabilitation, framing, repairing extedor
siding, painting, dry walling, plumbing, and electrical.
This is a multi-year program and will be completed
throught a cooperative effort between the City and the
Etiwanda Historical Society. Funding forthis activity
includes $15,000 of funds reprogrammed from pdor year
programs,
Help the Homeless? No Start Date: 07/01/01
Help those with HIV or AIDS? No Completion Date: 06/30/02
Eligibility: 570.208(b)(2) - Slums / Blight Spot
Subrecipient: Local Government
Location(s): Addresses
7086 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
CERTIFICATIONS
In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan
regulations, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that:
Affirmatively Further Fair Housing - The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing,
which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the
jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified
through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard.
Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan - It will comply with the acquisition and relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is
following a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section
104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection
with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs.
Drug Free Workplace - It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:
1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's
workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of
such prohibition;
2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
(c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;
and
(d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1;
4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of
employment under the grant, the employee will:
(a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal
drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such
conviction;
5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such
conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position
title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted
employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the
receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected
grant;
6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted -
(a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and
including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; or
(b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance
or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local
health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through
implementation of paragraphs 1,2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Anti-Lobbying - To the best of the judsdiction's knowledge and belief:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member
of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant. the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member
of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and
3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be
included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts,
subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all
subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Authority of Jurisdiction - The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as
applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which
it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations.
Consistency with plan - The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and
HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan.
Section 3 - It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968,
and implementing regulations at 24 CFR 135.
May 2, 2001
Signature/Authorized Official Date
Mayor
Title
/27
Specific CDBG Certifications
The City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that:
Citizen Participation - It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan
that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105.
Community Development Plan - Its consolidated housing and community development plan
identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-
term community development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic
opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income (see 24 CFR 570.2 and
24 CFR 570).
Following a Plan - It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD.
Use of Funds - It has complied with the following criteria:
1. Maximum Feasible Priority: With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG
funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible
priority to activities that benefit low and moderate-income families or aid in the prevention
or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the
grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a
particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available);
2. Overall Benefit: The aggregate use of CDBG funds, including section 108 guaranteed
loans, during program years 2000-2001 shall principally benefit persons of low- and
moderate-income in a manner that ensures that at least 70% of the amount is expended
for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period;
3. Special Assessments: It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public
improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds,
by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and
moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of
obtaining access to such public improvements.
However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to
the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other
revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to
the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds.
The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with
CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or
assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue
sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect
to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of
properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (not low-income) families, an assessment
or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other
than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment.
/2f
Excessive Force - It has adopted and is enfoming:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil dghts demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable Slate and local laws against physically bardng entrance
to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights
demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
Compliance With Anti-discrimination laws - The grant will be conducted and administered in
conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act
(42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations.
Lead-Based Paint - Its notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures concerning
lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR 570.608.
Compliance with Laws - It will comply with applicable laws.
May 2, 2001
Signature/Authorized Official Date
Mayor
Title
OPTIONAL CDBG CERTIFICATION
Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are
designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified
in 24 CFR 570.208(c):
The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically identified
CDBG-assisted activities, which are designed to meet other community development needs
having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet
such needs.
May 2, 2001
Signature/Authorized Official Date
Mayor
Title
Specific HOME Certifications
The HOME participating jurisdiction certifies that:
Tenant Based Rental Assistance - If the participating jurisdiction intends to provide tenant-
based rental assistance:
The use of HOME funds for tenant-based rental assistance is an essential
element of the participating jurisdiction's consolidated plan for expanding the
supply, affordability, and availability of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable
housing.
Eligible Activities and Costs - It is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and
costs, as described in 24 CFR 92.205 through 92.209 and that it is not using and will not use
HOME funds for prohibited activities, as described in § 92.214.
Appropriate Financial Assistance - Before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate
the project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not invest
any more HOME funds in combination with other federal assistance than is necessary to provide
affordable housing.
May 2, 2001
Signature/Authorized Official Date
Mayor
Title
APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS
INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
REQUIREMENTS:
A. Lobbyinq Certification
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed
when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a
prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 USC § 1352. Any
person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not
less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
B. Druq-Free Workplace Certification
1. By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is
providing the certification.
2. The certification is a matedal representation of fact upon which reliance is placed
when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee
knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of
the Drug-Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies available to
the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free
Workplace Act.
3. Workplaces under grants. for grantees other than individuals, need not be
identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in the grant
application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of
application, or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee must keep the
identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available
for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a
violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements.
4. Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of
buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical
descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State
highway department while in operation, State employees in each local
unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations).
5. If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the
grant, the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it previously
identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three).
6. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the
performance of work done in connection with the specific grant:
Place of Performance:
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Check __X if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here.
The certification with regard to the drug-free workplace is required by
24 CFR 24(F).
7. Definitions of terms in the Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment common
rule and Drug-Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees'
attention is called, in padicular, to the following definitions from these rules:
"Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in
Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act
(21 USC 812) and as furlher defined by regulation
(21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15);
"Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo
contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial
body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the
federal or state criminal drug statutes;
"Criminal drug statute" means a federal or non-federal criminal
statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or
possession of any controlled substance;
"Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in
the performance of work under a grant, including: (i) All "direct
charge" employees; (ii) all "indirect charge" employees unless their
impact or involvement is insignificant to the performance of the
grant; and (iii) temporary personnel and consultants who are
directly engaged in the performance of work under the grant and
who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include
workers not on the payroll of the grantee (e.g., volunteers, even if
used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent
contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of
subrecipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces).
THE C ITY 0 F
RANClIO CUCAMONGA
DATE May 2, 2001
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SUBAREA 18
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS - A request to
amend Planning Area 6 of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan to allow multiple family
residential development at a density range of 24 to 30 dwelling units per acre,
located on the north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 210-082-46.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Specific Plan Amendment.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
This is a request to amend the Subarea 18 Specific Plan to allow multiple family residential
development at a density range of 24 to 30 dwelling units per acre for Planning Area VI. A similar
amendment was approved for the JPI apartment project, which is under construction at the
northwest corner of 6th Street and Milliken Avenue.
At its March 28, 2001 meeting, the Commission determined by a vote of 5-0 that the amendment
does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan or the General Plan,
and will provide for the logical development of Planning Area VI. The proposed amendment is
consistent with the flexible land use concept of the Mixed Use zoning designation of the Subarea 18
Specific Plan. Copies of the Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes of the July 26, 2000,
meeting are attached.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, and
notices were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of Planning Area VI of Subarea 18.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SUBAREA 18 SPA 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
May 2, 2001
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
er
City Planner
BB:BIJjc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 28, 2001
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated March 28, 2001
Addendure to Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan Final FIR
(Provided Under Separate Cover)
Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-33 Recommending Approval of Subarea 18
Specific Plan Amendment 00-04
Ordinance - Approving Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment 00-04
T H E CITY OF
I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
DATE: March 28, 2001
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRCDR00-67 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS - A request to construct a 496-unit apartment
project on 23 acres of land in Planning Area 6 of the Subarea 18 Specfic Plan, located on
the north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 210-082-46.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15536 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS - A request to
subdivide 23 acres of land into two lots in Planning Area 6 of the Subarea 18 Specific
Plan, located on the north side of 4th Street, west of Mlliken Avenue - APN: 210-082-46.
ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 00-04- FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS - A request to amend Planning Area 6
of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan to allow multiple family residential development at a
density range of 24 to 30 dwelling units per acre, located on the north side of 4th Street,
west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 210-082-46.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
A. Existinq Zoning: Office Uses/Business Park designation of Planning Area 6 of the Subarea 18
Specific Plan.
B. Surroundin,q Land Use and Zoninq:
North - Empire Lakes Golf Course; Subarea 18 Specific Plan.
South - Vacant land on the south side of 4th Street within the City of Ontario.
East Vacant Land; Mixed Use Commercial Planning Area 7 (Subarea 18).
West Empire Lakes Golf Course; Subarea 18 Specific Plan.
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Mixed Use
North - Open Space
South - City of Ontario
East Mixed Use
West Open Space
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 00-67, PM 15536, SUBAREA 18 SPA 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
March 28, 2001
Page 2
D. Site Characteristics: The 23-acre site is cultivated as a vineyard and contains no significant
vegetation. The site slopes north to south approximately 27 feet over approximately 1,700 linear
feet, or 1.5 percent slope. The site will take access off of 4th Street to the south and future 5th
Street to the north.
E. Parkin,q Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Parking Spaces Spaces
Of Use Ratio Required Provided
Apartment's One Bedroom
Unit(s) 288 x 1.5 432 432
Two Bedroom
Unit(s) 184 x 1.8 331 334
Three Bedroom
Unit(s) 24 x 2 48 68
Guest 496/4 124 160
Total: 935 994
The proposed project requires the minimum provision of 935 parking spaces, 811 resident spaces and
124 guest spaces. Resident parking would be provided in attached garages, covered carports, and
surface parking. A total of 138 parking spaces are required to be within enclosed garages, and 295
parking spaces are proposed within enclosed garages (both attached and detached from the units).
Another 258 parking spaces are proposed to be within carports. The total open surface parking is 441
spaces.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The project would include 496 apartment units located in 23 separate unit cluster
buildings, with a combination of garage, carport, and surface parking. There are 288 one-bedroom
units, 184 two-bedroom units, and 24 three-bedroom units. The units range in size from
approximately 715 to 1,285 square feet of living area. Each unit would have a patio or deck and
laundry facilities (including a washer and dryer). The overall site is proposed to be divided into two
parcels separated by a wrought iron fence. Both "sub" projects would have their respective sets of
multi-family amenities, including a club house, lawn areas, barbeque facilities, seating areas with
overhead trellises (many oriented to take advantage of golf course views), pool and spa. The
amenities are scattered throughout the complex to maximize convenience of use.
The buildings have a mixture of hip and gable style roofs with flat concrete tile. The buildings are
accented with stacked stone to match the Empire Lakes golf course and horizontal siding.
t3 7
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 00-67, PM 15536, SUBAREA 18 SPA 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
March 28, 2001
Page 3
B. Specific Plan Amendment: The applicant is requesting to amend the Subarea 18 Specific Plan to
allow multiple family residential development at a density range of 24 to 30 dwelling units per acre,
and reduce minimum building separations for Subarea 6. A similar amendment was approved for
the JPI apartment project, which is under construction at the northwest corner of 6th Street and
Milliken Avenue.
C. Parcel Map: The applicant wishes to split the project into two parcels separated by a wrought iron
fence. The southern parcel will take access off of 4th Street, and the northern parcel will take
access off of future 5th Street. This is due to their marketing needs; therefore, included herein is a
request for a parcel map to subdivide the property into two parcels. The request is in conformance
with applicable regulations.
D. Desi,qn Review: The Development Agreement exempts this project from Design Review
Committee review. Staff is responsible for reviewing the design and making recommendations to
the Planning Commission. The overall design of the project will make a positive contribution to the
mixed use Master Plan. In keeping with the direction desired by the Commission to make this
project a "luxury high-end" project, additional conditions should be added to the Resolution of
Approval, as follows:
Outstandinq Desi~n Issues:
1. Provide additional stacked stone elements and horizontal siding for all sides of all buildings
within the project. Some sides of the buildings are almost entirely covered with stucco.
Additional stacked stone and horizontal siding would substantially enhance the buildings
consistent with the intent to develop a high-end, luxury residential project.
2. Provide stacked stone pilasters, maximum 150 feet on center, for the masonry/stucco walls to
match that proposed for the wrought iron fencing. The overall dimensions of the pilasters
shall match that established by the Empire Lakes golf course.
3. Provide stacked stone for the freestanding curved wall at the southeast entrance off of
4th Street.
4. Mail service structures shall be architecturally compatible with the project.
5. If the market dynamics change, and more than 3 percent of the renters are families with
children, then immediate provisions must be made to provide additional outdoor recreational
amenities for children.
E. Gradin.q and Technical Committees: The project was scheduled for Grading and Technical
Committee review on March 20th and 21st, respectively. Staff has been working closely with the
applicant to resolve issues.
F. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (E IR) was prepared and certified as
a Master EIR for Subarea 18 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in 1994. The California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further
EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR;
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 00-67, PM 15536, SUBAREA 18 SPA 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
March 28, 2001
Page 4
however, Planning Area 6, of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan is being amended to include residential
development, and an Addendum was prepared to address the issue of residential development. In
short, the proposed residential development will have less environmental impact than other mixed
uses, such as industrial, office, or retail. The amendment to the Subarea 18 Specific Plan has
been prepared in conjunction with an Addendum to the previously certified Rancho Cucamonga
IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan Final EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 93102055). The Addendum
identified that there are no substantial changes in the project that require major revisions to the
previous EIR. The appropriate findings of the Addendum are included in the attached Resolution of
Approval.
A noise study was prepared for this project to address traffic noise impacts. Recommended
mitigation measures include a 6-foot high sound barrier for all patios and balconies in buildings
facing 4th Street, "windows closed" design with mechanical ventilation system, and upgraded
windows.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review
DRCDR00-67 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15536 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of
Approval with conditions. Staff recommends that the Commission also review and consider the attached
Addendum to be within the scope of the certified Master EIR for the site and recommend approval to the
City Council of Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment 00-04.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:BL/jc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Illustrative Cross Sections
Exhibit "E" - Floor Plans
Exhibit"F"- Elevations
Exhibit "G" - Clubhouse Drawings
Exhibit "H" - Leasing Office Drawings
Exhibit "1" - Garage Drawings
Exhibit "J" - Noise Mitigation Details
Exhibit "K" - Parcel Map
Addendum To Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Industrial Area Specific Plan
Final EIR
Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRCDR 00-67
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15536
Resolution Recommending Approval of Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment 00-04
I/ ' "' /' t, \
,,, ;,"
/ /
) I ,'
GOLF COURSE ,7' ,,' ~ II
~' < /
" I
,,
0 U R T R .... %~'~ET ....................... SITS PLAN
..................................................................................... / 8ITS PLAN
Al-la ~ A1-1
PHASE I
GOLF COURSE [JJjJ
PARCEL 8
SITE (I)
~_3 ^CRE8
I ~ Y~ , ~
~PICAL SECTION - 4~h STREET SECTION J-j
SEC~ION B-B
SECTION C-C S~CTION O D SECTION E~E SECTION F-F SECTION K-K
LIGHTFOB1
PLANNIN;
tlGNTFOBT
PLAININS
CONCEPTUAL MONUMENT LUALL ,~\
~,~FPJ~E(~UE/pICNIC AR~SA ~ARBEQUE/PICNIC
~'~"~~''~u°~'~="~ ~NTRY TO 6ITE I ~"~ ENTRY TO 6ITE
TH[
LIGII1fOBI
PLANNING
GROUt
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING I-3
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING I-3
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T S
F~RBT LEVEL FLOOR pLAN BUILDING iV-3
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T S ~iii.;TT::i
i I
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN BUILD NG iV-3
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING V-3
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ........
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING V-3
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN {GARAGE LEVEL) BUILDING V~I-3
, L, B L
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS .......
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (GARAGE LEVEL) BUILDING VIII-3
EMPIRE LAKES - PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS .........
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING VIII-3
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
~_::: i~:;"::"'~-_-_'7~--.~ :=: _~
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (GARAGE LEVEL) BUILDING XIII-3
EMPIRE LAKES - PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
Alb Alb
TYPICAL LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING XIII-3
VELOPMENT L p. A ~ K
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS .......
SlOE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING I-3 (PHASE I)
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING I-3 (PHASE
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T S
~:,,:~ ;'.::.:::..
SIDE [LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING I-B IPHABE ()
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING I-3 [PHASE ~)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ......
SIDE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING I-3 (PHASE II}
FRONT (STREETI ELEVA~'ION BUILDING I-3 (PHASE II)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS .........
BIDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING I-3 (PHASE II)
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING I-3 (PHASE II)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
BIDE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING IV-3 (PHABE I)
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING IV-3 )PHASE
E u P s n E L A K E S P A n c E L e A P A n T U
SIDE {LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING IV-:] (PHASE I)
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING IV-3 (PHASE ))
E M P I R E I A K E S - P A R C E I 6 A P A R T M E N T S
SiDE (STREET) ELEVATION BUiLDiNG IV-3 (PHASE II)
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION SUILDING IV-3 (PHASE II)
SIDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING IV-3 (PHASE II)
i FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING IV-3 (pHASE II)
~ . c.~., ='~ EMPIRE LAKES - pARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ~!~;, ....
SIDE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING V-B (PHASE I)
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING V-B (PHASE
EMPIRE LAKES pARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ........
SIDE }LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING V-3 }PHASE I)
FRONT }LANDSCAPEI ELEVATION BUILDING V-3 {PHASE I)
EMPIRE LAKES pARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ~:~: .....
SIDE ISTREET) ELEVATION BUILDING V-3 {PHASE III
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING V-3 {pHASE II)
EMPIRE LAKES pARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
i~'::: ....
SIDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING V-8 (PHASE II)
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING V-S (PHASE (I)
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T S )~':::::'.::::
S~DE [STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING VII-3 [pHASE I)
FRONT [STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING VIi-3 (pHASE
EMPIRE LAKES pARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA
SIDE ]LANDSCAPE( ELEVATION BUILDING VII-3 (PHASE I)
FRONT (LANDSCAPE] ELEVATION BUILDING Vit-3 (pHASE I]
E M P I R E L A K E S P a R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T S !;'~;!'~:~:':
=,,=,,,,~,
SIDE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING VIi-3 (pHASE II)
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING Vii-3 (pHASE II)
6 APARTMENTS .....
E M P I R E L A K E S - P A R C E L
SiDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING VII-3 (PHASE
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING VII-3 (PHASE II]
SIDE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING VIII-3 (PHASE
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING VIII-3 (PHASE I)
EMPIRE LAKES pARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ,=~,!~, ....
81DE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING VIII-3 (pHASE
FRONT (LANDSCAPEI ELEVATION BUILDING VIII-3 (PHASE
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T
BIDE (BTREET) ELEVATION BUILDING VIIi-3 (PHASE
FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION BUILD~NG VIII-3 (PHASE ll)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS
SIDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING VIII-3 (PHASE I~)
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING VIII-3 (PHASE I1)
F F DEVELOPMENT L P. ~, ~,[]
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R T M E N T S !'::~':~.!~:
ii~ .........
81DE (STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING Xlll-3 (PHASE I)
FRONT (STREET( ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHASE I)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS .........
SIDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHASE I)
FRONT (LANDBCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHASE I)
E M P I R E L A K E S P A R C E L 6 A P A R t M E N t S !:.'.'!!~,"~:.:.:
SIDE (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHASE II)
FRONT (LANDSCAPE) ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHASE II)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ........
SIDE {STREET) ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHAEE II)
FRONT (STBEET) ELEVATION BUILDING XIII-3 (PHASE II)
ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE (~)
FLOOR PLAN - CLUBHOUSE (PHASE I) <~ HOOF PLAN - CLUBHOUSE (PHASE I) .~
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ........
ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE
ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE
ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE (PHASE I)
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ............
FLOOR PLAN - CLUBHOUSE (PHASE I~)
ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE
~ EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ......
~ .......
ROOF PLAN ~
ELEVATION - LEASING OFFICE
FLOOR PLAN - LEASING OFFICE IPHASE II) .r~
ELEVATION ~ LEASING OFFICE {~)
ELEVATION - LEASING OFFICE C~)
~ EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ...........
FLOOR PLAN - MAIL ROOM ROOF PLAN - MAIL ROOM ~ FLOOR PLAN - MAINTENANCE BUILDING ~ ROOF PLAN - MAINTENANCE
ELEVATIONS - MAIL ROOM PHASE I <~) ELEVATIONS - MAINTENANCE PHASE
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS .........
REFUSE ENCLOSURE
ELEVATIONS - GARAGE
EMPIRE LAKES PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ~ ......
<~L~,BS~EVEL PAT'O SECONO LEVEL "ALCO"Y
SOUND WALL NO)SE BARR)ER
PAT)O AND BALCONY NO)SE BABB)EB - FLOOR PLANB
~ ..... . TYPICAL SECTION
~ PATIO AND SALCONY NOIBE BARRIER STREET 81DE OF BUILDIN~8 FRONTING 4TH ST.
~ ~ EMPIRE LAKES - PARCEL 6 APARTMENTS ~'~=. ......
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0.15536 ~' ;~o
H. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15536 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS - A request to
subdivide 23 acres of land into two lots in Planning Area 6 of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan,
located on the north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 210-082-46. Related
file: Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment 00-04 and Development Review 00-67.
I. ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS -A request to amend Planning Area 6 of the
Subarea 18 Specific Plan to allow multiple family residential development at a density range of
24 to 30 dwelling units per acre, located on the nodh side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue
- APN: 210-082-46. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map 15536 and Development Review
00-67.
NEW BUSINESS
J. ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRCDR00-67 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS - A request to construct a 496-unit apartment
project on 23 acres of land in Planning Area 6 of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on the
north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue -APN: 210-082-46. Related file: Tentative
Parcel Map 15536 and Addendum to Environmental Impact Report and Subarea 18 Specific
Plan Amendment 00-04.
Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and suggested adding a condition that
approval of the Parcel Map and Development Review would be contingent upon approval of the
related Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment. He indicated a Developers Workbook with site plan,
elevations, floor plans, landscape plan, etc. had been placed in front of the Commissioners.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if all the grading and technical issues had been resolved.
Mr. Le Count replied that some were resolved and the other issues were ~laced as conditions of
approval.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the project will be developed in two phases since it is being split into
two parcels.
Mr. Le Count was not sure if they would be developed at different times.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Dan Milich, Development Manager, Fairfield, 5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, gave a
brief background of the history of the company. He said they used the JPI Development project as a
basis for their plans. He indicated they want two parcels because they plan to have two investors
but stated they plan to construct both parcels at the same time. He thanked staff and the
Commission for providing design direction and said that staff had been very helpful.
Commissioner Mannerino asked if Fairfield will manage both phases of the project.
Mr. Milich replied affirmatively.
Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 28, 2001
Chuck Buquet Charles Joseph & Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho
Cucamonga, stated he was working for Fairfield. He said they met with staff to discuss building
materials enhancements. He indicated they concurwith the conditions of approval. With respect to
the condition requiring installation for fiber optic cable conduit, Mr. Buquet stated they felt the
conduit is normally installed by the cable providers under a franchise agreement with the City. He
thought installation of the conduit will not be a direct benefit to the project and he suggested it
should be a City project. He requested they not be required to underground the utilities along 4th
Street because they have only a small frontage there and they would only be able to underground
two of the lines while the other two lines would have to remain on the poles and they would not be
eligible for reimbursement from future development across the street since it is in Ontario. He
suggested the project pay a fair share with the balance to be paid for by City. He asked that they be
allowed to further discuss the matter with the City because he thought the City was considering
changing the undergrounding policy. He reported that General Dynamics had reviewed the package
before submittal and supported the project.
Commissioner Mannerino asked if the applicant had contacted any of the cable providers to see if
they would like to work with them during construction of the project.
Mr. Buquet replied that there are five different sizes of conduit. He noted that 4th Street had recently
been refinished as a City project and suggested the street should not be tom up in order to lay cable
or underground the utilities.
Commissioner Mannerino could not imagine true luxury apartments that do not offer fiber optic
system cabling.
Mr. Buquet said they will have DSL, but not fiber optic.
D'metre Farris, 6281 Kinlock Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, asked for whom the project is being
built. He thought that most everything in the City is being built for higher income and asked about
providing lower income housing.
Chairman McNiel replied that the State requires a certain percentage of low income housing units
within each City. He said the City has a range of units. He stated that many of the lower pdced
units look like they would be higher priced.
Jeff Kudlac, General Dynamics Corporation, 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite 440, Ontario,
stated they did thorough research before selecting Fairfield. He reported that JPI is now under
construction and said theyfeel Fairfield has financing and quality. He thought the apartments would
help them to market the retail and office uses on the site.
Ryan Adams, 730 Hanover Court, Rancho Cucamonga, felt it will be too crowded to have a ratio of
24-30 dwelling units per acre and noted that is much higher than a typical residential project of
single family homes. He asked how they will fit so many units on the site.
Chairman McNiel replied that they are apartments and will be three to four stories tall. He said that
when such a density is proposed, the project provides common amenities such as swimming pool,
open space, etc. He noted the project is very close to the train station and residents will be able to
walk to the trains to reach jobs in Los Angeles. He felt the project will attract residents because of
the proximity to the train station and the golf course.
Mr. Adams thought that will change the face of Rancho Cucamonga.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- March 28, 2001
Iq5
Chairman McNiel responded that each new development has changed the face of Rancho
Cucamonga and it will change even more in the future because it is an area that is growing.
Anita Patell, 8008 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, asked that the Commission keep the
electrical crisis in mind. She asked why the City would allow 496 more apartments to be built.
Commissioner Mannerino stated the Commission is aware of the crisis, but he did not think that was
a reason to deny a project.
Chairman McNiel thought hew power plants will be built within the near future which will provide
sufficient electricity. He did not think it is advisable to stop the world and get off because of the
crisis.
Ms. Patel felt that allowing more buildings would not help citizens who are on a fixed income and
have trouble paying their bills.
Chairman McNiel likened the electrical cdsis to the gas crunch of the 1970s and said that no one
called for a halt in car sales even though people were having to line up for blocks in order to get gas.
Hearing no furlher testimony, he closed the public hearing. He asked for clarification on the fiber
optic conduit installation.
Mr. Buller stated the condition calls for installation of conduit and pertinent structures to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer but does not indicate from where the conduit must start. He said
the City is not asking that the cable be installed, merely the conduit for cabling. He reported the City
has been getting it on other residential projects.
Chairman McNiel noted that some developers have wired for fiber optic cabling without the item
being placed as a condition.
Mr. Buller stated that other developers have provided fiber optic cabling. He noted that existing
streets are constantly being torn up to provide cabling.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the condition is to install conduit within the public right of
way, which means it may be installed in the parkway or the street. He said it would be considered a
public improvement similar to street trees, sidewalks, and street lights.
Chairman McNiel felt the condition requiring undergrounding is consistent with what has been
required of other projects.
Commissioner Stewart noted that Mr. Buquet indicated there are talks with administration regarding
changing the policy.
Mr. Buller confirmed that staff has been asked to look at the policy.
Commissioner Tolstoy thought the policy was being looked at in connection with established
businesses which desire to expand or upgrade their site.
Mr. Buller confirmed the question was raised with respect to existing businesses that wish to expand
and also a larger issue of parcel-by-parcel development.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt that if the City does not get undergrounding on a parcel-by-parcel basis, it
would never be done. He thought that anything that can be done to enhance the ability to
Planning Commission Minutes -7- March 28, 2001
communicate should be done and the requirement for installing fiber optic conduit should remain.
He said he participated in the planning when Chaffey College installed conduit so they could have
enhanced communication availability. He said they have since upgraded the system twice. He felt
the project will have a lot of offices and would need fiber optics.
Mr. Buller felt the condition requiring installation of conduit was flexible and would allow the applicant
to work with the City Engineer.
Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing.
Mr. Buquet stated that he would like to be able to address the fiber optic conduit condition with the
City Engineer. He thought it is an issue of fairness and equity and said they will be the first project
conditioned to install the conduit.
Chairman McNiel again closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart, to adopt the resolutions recommending
approval of Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment and approving Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM15536 and DRCDR00-67 with the added condition that the Parcel Map and Development
Review approvals are contingent upon approval of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment.
Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
COMMISSION BUSINESS
K. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT
Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Mannedno stated the plan need
Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart initiate an amendment to the
Victoria Community Plan. Motion carried by the vote:
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
The Planning Commission 8:19 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
D. ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-34 -
- A request to construct a 148,663 square foot retail store, which also
a tire sales and installation center (5,200 square feet), food service (1,042 square
Commission Minutes -8- March 28, 2001
RESOLUTION NO. 01-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 00-04, A REQUEST
TO AMEND PLANNING AREA 6 TO ALLOW MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT A DENSITY RANGE OF 24 TO 30
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH
STREET WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORTTHEREOFJAPN: 210-082-46.
A. Recitals.
1. Fairfield Development filed an application for Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Amendment is
referred to as "the application."
2. On the 28th day of March 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1 ,' This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headng on March 28, 2001, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The proposed amendment is consistent with the flexible land use concept of the
Subarea 18 Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public headrig and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The amendment does not conflict with the'Land Use Policies of the Subarea 18
Specific Plan or the General Plan, and will provide for the logical development of the Planning Area 6
and the General Plan and with related development; and
b. The amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-33
SUBAREA 18 AMENDMENT 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
March 28, 2001
Page 2
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Subarea 18 Specific
Plan and the purposes of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan,
4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master EIR forthe
Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Section 21157.1 provides that the preparation and certification of a Master EIR allows for the
limited review of subsequent projects that were described in the Master EIR as being within the
scope of the reporting accordance with certain requirements. However, because of the changes
that are submitted by this project, an Addendum was prepared for said project. An Addendure to the
Subarea 18 Specific Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation because some changes or
additions are necessary to describe the proposed residential project but none of the conditions
described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR
have occurred. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the attached Addendure
based on the following findings:
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions
to the previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
severity of previously identified significant effects.
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects.
c. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master EIR
(SCH~93102055) for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The Califomia Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Section 21157.1 provides that the preparation and certification of a Master El R allows for the
limited review of subsequent projects that were described in the Master EIR as being within the
scope of the Master EIR. However, because of the changes that are submitted by this project, an
Addendure was prepared for said project. An Addendure to the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea
18 Specific Plan final EIR is appropriate documentation because some changes or additions are
necessary to descdbe the proposed residential project, however none of the conditions described in
the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the attached Addendum based on the
following findings:
5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paregraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this
Commission hereby recommends approval of Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment No. 00-04, as
shown in the Staff Report and attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-33
SUBAREA 18 AMENDMENT 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
March 28, 2001
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2001.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ~~dhairm~'n '
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 28th day of Mamh 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
FF DEVELOPMENT L.P. Telephone (858) 457-2123
Facsimile (858) 457-1121
September 26, 2000
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Empire Lakes-Parcel 6 Project Description
The below text describes the proposed amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area
Specific Plan CIASP) Sub-Area 18, Planning Area VI. This amendment is proposed to allow
multiple family residential development in Planning Area VI as a permitted use.
This amendment to Sub-Area 18, Planing Area VI has been prepared in conjunction with an
Site Location
Planning Area VI of the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is located north of Fourth Street, east
of the Empire Lakes Golf Course, west of planning Area VII, and south of the FiRh Street
extension.
Amendments to IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Phn
The following amendments are applicable to the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan to allow
multiple family residential development as an additional permitted use within Planning Area VI.
Section 1.4
~LANNING AREA VI - OFFICE USES/BUSINESS PARK/MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
This planning area is approximately 23 acres and includes the greatest amount of golf course
footage of any planning area within the Sub-Area 18. The summary land use matrix identifies a
variety of uses that are compatible with the golf course including: indoor
recreation/entertainment; restaurant; mixed use commercial; hotel/conference center;
office/commercial; multiple family residential; m-~ research and development/light industrial;
and business park.
TABLE 1-1 and TABLE 4-1 (SUMMARY OF LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) are amended to
include Multiple Family Residential for Planning Area VI with a Maximum Development
Potential of 690 residential units and a density of 24-30 dn/ac.
Section 4.2 Land Use Plan
SOUTHEASTERN ANCHOR (Fourth Street and Millicent Avenue)
Planning Area VI: · Office/Commercial
· Multiple Family Residential
This planning area has both visibility from fourth Street and extensive golf course amenity
frontage. It is envisioned to be a campus-style office/business park or a multiple family
residential development capltalizin9 on the golf course amenity. This parcel is also a potential
,,,
City ofRancho Cucamonga
September 26, 2000
Page 2
TABLE 5-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY PLANNING AREA is amended to include
Multiple Family Residential as a Permitted (P) use in Planning Area VI.
TABLE 5-2 LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS is amended to include RESIDENTIAL use types
with the following sub-category:
High Residential Density
High density residential development with a density of up to 30 dwelling units per gross
acre. Development shall be compatible with surrounding uses.
Section 5.3 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
Planning Area VI High Density Residential Site Development Standards
Residential uses in Planning Area VI shall comply with Chapter 17.08 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code for the High Residential District (H) zone, except as modified
below:
A. Table 17.08.040-D - Street scape Setback Standards:
Minimum building setback along Fourth Street for multiple family residential
shah be 45 feet.
FIGURE 5-1 CONCEPTUAL STREET SCAPE MASTER PLAN amend to remove the through
street shown from Fourth Street to Fifth Street along the eastern boundary of planning Area VI.
FIGURE 5-2 MAJOR ARTERIAL DIVIDED STREET CLASSIFICATION amend to allow
linear sidewalks to create a more urban form.
General Amendments
1. In instances in which the Development Guidelines are inconsistent with the
implementation of an "urban" development theme for Planning Area VI, as well as the
Site Plan specific for this area, minor departures from the Design Guidelines are
acceptable subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
1. In the event of a conflict between the amended Specific Plan and the Development Code,
the amended Specific Plan shall govern.
5510 Mornhouse Drive, Suite 200 · San Diego, California 92121
City ofRancho Cucamonga
September 26, 2000
Page 3
Fairfield prides itself on the design and construction quality of its apartment communities. This
project will be a viable component to the surrounding uses, and will provide a quality living
environment for our tenants.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information (858) 457-2123.
Very truly yours,
Ed McCoy
Pre-development Manager
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200 · San Diego, California 92121
FF DEVELOPMENT L.P. Telephone (858) 457-2123
Facsimile (858) 457-1121
September 26, 2000
City ofRancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Empire Lakes-Parcel 6 Project Description
The below text describes the proposed amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area
Specific Plan GASP) Sub-Area 18, Planning Area VI. This amendment is proposed to allow
multiple family residential development in Planning Area VI as a permitted use.
This amendment to Sub-Area 18, Planing Area VI has been prepared in conjunction with an
Site Location
Planning Area VI of the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is located north of Fourth Street, east
of the Empire Lakes Golf Course, west of planning Area VII, and south of the Fifth Street
extension.
Amendments to IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan
The following amendments are applicable to the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan to allow
multiple family residential development as an additional permitted use within Planning Area VI.
Section 1.4
PLANNING AREA VI - OFFICE USES/BUSINESS PARK/MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
This planning area is approximately 23 acres and includes the greatest amount of golf course
footage of any planning area within the Sub-Area 18. The summary land use matrix identifies a
variety of uses that are compatible with the golf course including: indoor
recreation/entertainment; restaurant; mixed use commercial; hotel/conference center;
office/commercial; multiple family residential; ar~ research and development/light industrial;
and business park.
TABLE 1-1 and TABLE 4-1 (SUMMARY OF LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM) are amended to
include Multiple Family Residential for Planning Area VI with a Maximum Development
Potential of 690 residential units and a density of 24-30 du/ac.
' Section 4.2 Land Use Plan
SOUTHEASTERN ANCHOR (Fourth Street and Millicent Avenue)
Planning Area Vl: · Office/Commercial
· Multiple FarnilV Residential
This planning area has both visibility from fourth Street and extensive golf course amenity
frontage. It is envisioned to be a campus-style office/business park or a multiple family
residential development capitali~in~ on the ~off eourse amenity. This parcel is also a potential
City ofRancho Cucamonga
September 26, 2000
Page 2
TABLE 5-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY PLANN1NG AREA is amended to include
Multiple Family Residential as a Permitted (P) use in Planning Area VI.
TABLE 5-2 LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS is amended to include RESIDENTIAL use types
with the following sub-category:
High Residential Density
High density residential development with a density of up to 30 dwelling units per gross
acre. Development shall be compatible with surrounding uses.
Section 5.3 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
Planning Area VI High Density Residential Site Development Standards
Residential uses in Planning Area VI shall comply with Chapter 17.08 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Development Code for the High Residential District (H) zone, except as modified
below:
A. Table 17.08.040-D - Street scape Setback Standards:
Minimum building sethack along Fourth Street for multiple family residential
shah be 45 feet.
FIGURE 5-1 CONCEPTUAL STREET SCAPE MASTER PLAN amend to remove the through
street shown ~'om Fourth Street to Fifth Street along the eastern boundary of planning Area VI.
FIGURE 5°2 MAJOR ARTERIAL DIVIDED STREET CLASSIFICATION amend to allow
linear sidewalks to create a more urban form.
General Amendments
1. In instances in which the Development Guidelines are inconsistent with the
implementation of an "urban" development theme for Planning Area VI, as well as the
Site Plan specific for this area, minor departures fi'om the Design Guidelines are
acceptable subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
1. In the event of a conflict between the amended Specific Plan and the Development Code,
the amended Specific Plan shall govern.
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200 · San Diego, California 92121
City of Rancho Cucamonga
September 26, 2000
Page 3
Fairfield prides itselfon the design and constmction quality ofits apartment communities. This
project will be a viable component to the surrounding uses, and will provide a quality living
environment for our tenants.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information (858) 457-2123.
Very truly yours,
Ed McCoy
Pre-development Manager
5510 MorehouseDrive, Suite 200 · San Diego, California 92121
'3 Ranch· Cucamonga IASP Sub-Araa 18 Specific Plan
~ TABLE 4-1
SUMMARY OF LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
This table is conceptual to illustrate and summarize the maximum development potential of the
~ project. See Section 4.2, Land Use Plan, as well as Table 5.1 and 5.2 for permitted land uses and
definitions.
~ ~'1 Types of Uses
= = ~ ~ _--~ FAR
., · ,e= o ~ LL Development Area
- Planning
Parcel/Facility Area (Acres) O _ ~v O ~ rf S: S; units) du/ac
· Building 600 V~ 27 e O e · O e · 308,0001 0.25e
Building 602 II 28 · · · · · · · · 425,000 0.359
.] Subtoil 72 975,000 0.31
Golf Course (including
clubhouse and
~-} m.,.,..a.ce~,~> , ~51 . . . . . 00,000 0.01
Goff Practice Fadlity lIP 22 15,0004 0.019
(lighted) · · · · · · · ·
Commercial/Industrial --~_V_,.~ 23 · · ,· · · · · · ~425,000 0.35'
' Parcels
VIII 23 · · · · 320,000 0.35
... . 290,000
X 24 · · · · · · 200,000 0.20~
-~ XI 18 · · · 275,000 0.35
Subtotal 133 2,240,000 0.39
Multiple Family up to 615 du 24-30
] Residential IX 20.5 · du/ac
' Subtotal 173 615 du or 24-30
Commercial/ du/ac
industdal
- Total 378e 3,000,000 sf 0.56
and 30 du; or
3,290,000 sf
R:~PrqectsuPr, Joo~ seabe 4-o~230~ .'~d 4.-5 Development Framework
Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan
TABLE 5-1
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY pLANNING AREA
MANUFACTURING
.Qht F
Medium
WHOLESALE/STORAGE/DISTRIBUTION
Light P P P P' P P P P
Medium p p C C
MATERIALS RECOVERY
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (R&D)
OFFICE
CNIC
Administrative Civic Services P P P P P P P P
Cultural p P P P P P C P
Public ASsembly P P P P P P P P
Public Buildings (library, post office, etc.) P P P P P P P P
Religious Assembly
PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC USES
Clubs/Ledges (Pdvate and Public) C C C C C C C C C C C
Convalescent Facilities/HOSpital C C C C C C C C C
Transl3mtat~on Facilities
RECREATION
Golf Course
Golf Practice/Training Facility
ENTERTAINMENT
Family Entertainment Center (1)
EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS
Eating and Ddnking Establishments (1) P P P P P P P P ~ P I P I P
R;',PrOjeCIS~JPIt. lO01 ~ 5-1~L~0~O1 .wp~
Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific" n '
TABLE 5-1 (continued)
SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY PLANNING AREA
TRANSIENT ACCOMM NCE CENTER
HotelSMotel I P P P P P P
XED-USE COMMERCIAL
PERSONAI_~BUSINESS SERVICES
Funeral & Cre~c~atory Services I I C C C C C C C C C C
PePsonal Services P P P P P P P P P P
Repair Servi p p p p p p p p p p
AUTOMOBILEJVEHICLE SERVICES
ORD,NANCENO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 00-04 TO AMEND PLANNING AREA VI TO ALLOW
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT A DENSITY
RANGE OF 24 TO 30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-082-46.
A. Recitals.
1. Fairfield Development filed an application for Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment
00-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 28th day of March 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval
of said application.
3. On May 2, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurre,d.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced
public hearing on May 2, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment;
and
c. The proposed amendment is consistent with the flexible land use concept of the
Mixed Use zoning designation of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBAREA 18 SPA 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
May2,2001
Page 2
a. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Subarea 18
Specific Plan or the General Plan, and will provide for the logical development of Planning Area VI;
and
b. The amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Subarea 18 Specific
Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Subarea 18 Specific
Plan and the purposes of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan; and
e. The proposed amendment is consistent with key land use objectives identified in
the General Plan including; encouraging opportunities to mix different but compatible land uses and
activities, promote land use patterns that encourage non-motorized modes of transportation, and
organize land uses to promote the maximal opportunity for transit usage; and
f. The inclusion of multi-family residential land use for Planning Area VI will provide
an integrated environment that will respond to evolving market conditions, and will help to create a
City that functions efficiently, is exciting to live in, and makes the best use of its various resources
pursuant to the objectives of the General Plan.
4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master EIR for
the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Section 21157.1 provides that the preparation and certification of a Master EIR allows for
the limited review of subsequent projects that were described in the Master EIR as being within the
scope of the reporting accordance with certain requirements; however, because of the changes that
are submitted by this project, an Addendum was prepared for said project. An Addendure to the
Subarea 18 Specific Plan Final EIR is appropriate documentation, because some changes or
additions are necessary to describe the proposed residential project, but none of the conditions
described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR
have occurred. The City Council has reviewed and considered the attached Addendure based on
the following findings:
a. There have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions
to the previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in
severity of previously identified significant effects.
b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under
which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects.
c. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known, and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was
certified as complete, that shows any of the following: 1 ) the project will have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 2) significant effects previously examined will
be substantially more severe than shown in the previous El R; 3) mitigation measures or alternatives
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
SUBAREA 18 SPA 00-04 - FAIRFIELD APARTMENTS
May 2, 2001
Page 3
previously found not to be feasible, would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different
from those analyzed in the final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on
the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Subarea 18 Specific Plan Amendment No. 00-04, as shown in the
Staff Report and attached Exhibit "A," as well as any related text, tables, figures, and maps to
maintain consistency subject to each and every Condition set forth below:
Planninq Division
1. Within 45 days of the City Council approval, or prior to issuance of
building permits, whichever comes first, a revised plan text and
graphics, including all renumbered pages within affected sections, shall
be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval. Upon
acceptance by the City Planner, a total of 25, 3-hole punched copies of
the revised plan shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council,
the Planning Commission, Library, and staff. In addition, one unbound
original, and one executable copy in Microsoff Word file format on a
3.5-inch IBM formatted diskette shall be submitted.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS PROJECT
PLANNING AREA VI
ADDENDUM TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IASP SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN
FINAL EIR (SCH NO. 9310255)
Prepared for:
FF Development, L.P.
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92121
Prepared by:
BonTerra Consulting
151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200
Costa Mesa, California 92626
March 19, 2001
IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS PROJECT
PLANNING AREA VI
ADDENDUM TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IASP SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN
FINAL EIR (SCH NO. 9310255)
Prepared for:
FF Development, L.P.
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92121
Prepared by:
BonTerm Consulting
151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200
Costa Mesa, California 92626
March 19, 2001
I Imnw~KVl=aitway Palms
Addendure to a Previous~/ Certified EIR
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Pa.qe No.
I 1, Purpose of Addendum .................................................. 1
2. Project Location ....................................................... 2
2.1 Project Location .................................................. 2
2.2 Project Site Charactedstica .......................................... 2
I 3. Project Description .................................................... 3
3.1 Previously Approved Project ......................................... 3
3.2 Currently Proposed Project: Ironwood/Fairway Palms ..................... 3
I 4. Comparative Environmental Analysis ...................................... 7
4.1 Land Use ....................................................... 7
4.2 Traffic and Circulation .............................................. 8
4.3 Noise ......................................................... 10
4.4 Air Quality ...................................................... 15
I 4.5 Earth Resources ................................................. 19
4.6 Hydrology/Drainage and Water Quality ................................ 21
4.7 Biological Resources ............................................. 22
4.8 Public Services and Utilities ........................................ 23
I 4.9 Energy Demand and Conservation ................................... 25
4.10 Hazardous Materials .............................................. 27
I 5. Conclusions ......................................................... 28
6. References ......................................................... 29
I Appendices
I Appendix A Noise Study
Appendix B Geotechnical Study
I
I
!
I
I
!
I
Ironwoocl/Fainvay Palms I
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
LIST OF EXHIBITS I
Follows
Exhibit Page Number !
1 Regional Location IVlap .................................................... 2
2 Site Vicinity Map ......................................................... 2 I
3 Site Plan ............................................................... 4
4 Conceptual Building Elevations .............................................. 6
LIST OF TABLES I
Table Page Number I
1 Project Statistics ......................................................... 4
2 Parking Statistics ......................................................... 6 I
3 Planning Area Vh Existing Trip Generation .................................... 8
4 Planning Area Vh Trip Rates and Trip Generation Summary ...................... 10
5 Existing Noise Levels .................................................... 13 I
6 Future Noise Level Increases .............................................. 14
7 Emission Thresholds of Significance ......................................... 15
8 Energy Demand ........................................................ 26 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
R:',P~jeC~S~FF De~J001 Addendur~031S01 w~d ii Table of Contents i
Imnwcx~d/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
SECTION 1
PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM
I 1.1 PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM
This Addendum to the certified final environmental impact report (El R) for the Rancho Cucamonga
I Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Sub-Area 18 project was prepared in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code §21000, et
seq and the CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq. The CEQA
i Guidelines §15164(a) state that "the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an
addendum to a previously certified El R if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the
conditions descdbed in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred."
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15162, a subsequent EIR is only required when: a) substantial
I changes are proposed in the project... or; b) substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is undertaken... which will require major revisions to the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
I increase in the sevedty of previously identified significant effects... or; c) new information of
substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of
reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete... that shows that (i)
I the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; or ii)
significant effects previously examined will be substantially more sever than shown in the previous
EIR; or ill) mitigation measures or altematives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv) mitigation
measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR
i would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative."
i This Addendum analyzes the differences between the project which was previously approved by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Planning Area VI and which was studied under the Rancho
Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan Final EIR (SCH No. 93102055), and the project for
Planning Area VI which is currently being proposed by FF Development, L.P., which is known as
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that changes associated with the currently
I proposed project are minor and not substantial. There are no new significant environmental
impacts resulting from these changes, nor is there any substantial increase in the sevedty of any
previously identffied environmental impacts. In addition, there are no substantial changes with
I respect to the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that would require any
revisions to the previously certified final EIR. These conclusions have been reached based on the
preparation of new technical studies, as necessary, to assess the potential environmental impacts
I of the proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms project. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
§15164, an Addendum to the previously certified IASP Sub-Area 18 Final EIR is the appropriate
environmental documentation for the proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms residential development
i project.
I
I
Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
I SECTION 2
PROJECT LOCATION
I 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The project site is located within the 380~acre Sub-Area 18 Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area
I Specific Plan (IASP) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, as
depicted in Exhibit 1. The IASP Sub-Area 18 is bounded on the south by Fourth Street, on the east
by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station, and on the west by
Cleveland Avenue and Utica Street. The project site is referred to as Planning Area VI of the IASP
I Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan.
Planning Area VI is an irregularly-shaped parcal generally bordered by Planning Area VIII (vacant)
to the north, Fourth Street to the south, Planning Area VII (vacant) to the east, and the Empire
Lakes Golf Course to the north and west, as depicted on Exhibit 2. For the purpose of site
development, the proposed Planning Area VI project site is comprised of two areas: Site I and Site
I II. Site I is 12.3 acres and is the southern portion of Planning Area VI. Site I is generally bounded
by Site II and the Empire Lakes Golf Course to the north, Fourth Street to the south, Planning Area
VII to the east, and Planning Area V to.the west. Site II is 11.1 acres and is the northern portion of
I Planning Area VI. Site II is bounded by Planning Area VIII to the north, Site I to the south, Planning
Area VII to the east, and the golf course to the west. Fifth Street abuts the northern boundary of
Site II.
I 2.2 PROJECT SITE CHARACTERISTICS
I The 23.4-acre planning area has grape vineyards in the northern portion of the property; the
southern portion of the property is vacant. Planning Area VI contains no existing onsite structures
or has any predominant features. Onsite elevations range from approximately 1,055 feet above
i mean sea level (msl) to the north to 1,035 feet msl to the south.
I
I
!
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
ILt~DA
I
!
I
Regional Location Map Exhibit
i ~,
IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS c o ,~ s u ~ T ,
I
a,h STREET
~ 6th S~ ~ET
~ 5TH STREET ~
Soume: AEI-CASC
Vicinit~ ~ap
IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendum to a Previous~ Certified EIR
I SECTION 3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
I 3.t PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
In July 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified a final EIR (SCH No. 93102055) and
I - approved the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan for the 380-acre site, inclusive of Planning Area VI,
incorporating a mix of land uses. The intent of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan was to create a
unique master planned project that integrated a broader mix of uses in this area, including office,
light industrial, hotel/conference, retail, restaurant, entertainment, and research and development
I uses around a championship golf course.
Planning Area VI is designated Mixed Use in the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan. The Rancho
I Cucamonga General Plan defines Mixed Use as follows:
"The opportunity exists to mix different, but compatible, land uses and activities within
I mixed use developments. Mixed use developments are ideally suited for land within the
downtown or adjacent to high activity nodes along major transportation corridors. The
concept capitalizes on the ability of a mixed-use project to provide an integrated
I environment, to respond to evolving market conditions. to offer a variety of physical
development types, and to create strong pedestrian orientation. Mixed use projects
typically incorporate a mix of office, commercial, light industrial, and research oriented
I activities, and residential uses a~ clustered together into unified, highly identifiable
developments. Entertainment, recreational, cultural, and convention uses may also be part
of the mix. These projects bring an "urban scale" and are intended to become focal points
within the community. Uses may be stacked within a single multi-use building or
I individually arranged together on a parcel. When built adjacent to, or in conjunction with,
public transit facilities, a built-in ridership base is established."
The adopted Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan assumed the development of Planning Area VI with up to
425,000 square feet of mixed use office/commercial uses. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan currently
permits residential development only in Planning Area IX.
I 3.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT: IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS
I The project applicant, FF Development, L.P., is requesting an amendment to the IASP Sub-Area
18 Specific Plan to allow multiple-family residential uses as an additional permitted use in Planning
Area VI. As previously noted, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Mixed Use land use
designation permits residential development.
The proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms project would allow the development of a 496-unit, multiple-
I family apartment community. The project applicant's objective for the inclusion of residences in
the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan is to compliment the ongoing development of the Specific Plan area
by providing additional residential opportunities in the predominately office/research and
development, retail, and light industdal area and to help foster a jobs/housing balance in the
I southem portion of the City of Rancho Cucemonga.
As proposed, the Ironwood/Fairway Palms project would include 496 apartments units located on
I two sites which compdse the 23.4-acre Planning Area VI site. Project statistics are presented in
Table 1. The proposed site plan is depicted on Exhibit 3. Although comprised of two site areas,
the project applicant proposes to implement Planning Area VI as a single phased development.
I However, no vehicular or pedestrian access would be provided between Sites I and II.
i R:',PrOjeCIS',FF De,,U00~ Ad~ndur~03~So~.w~ 3 Project Descfiptio~
Ironwood/Fairway I~alms I
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
TABLE t
PROJECT STATISTICS I
i !~ N~!~ DenSity! ~ Parking I
UztttT~fLand~ i~ts,~q~Feet %ofNetAma!
site i
One bedroom unit 156 I
Two bedroom unit 92
Throe bedroom u~it 12 i
Guest 0
Total 260 units 22% 488 spaces I
Clubhouse 5,364 sq.~. 1%
Ancillary Facilities: 48,022 sq.ft. 10%
Maintenance Buildings, etc. I
Swimming Pool 1 pool -
Landscaping 180,967 sq.ff. 35%
Common and Private Open 214,567 sq.fi. 45% I
Space
Site II ~i I
One bedroom unit 132
Two bedroom unit 92
Throe bedroom unit 12 I
Guest 0
Total 236 units 21% 464 spaces I
Clubhouse 5,397 sq.ff. 1%
Ancillary Facilities: 43,300 sq.f~. 8% I
Maintenance Buildings, etc.
Swimming Pool 1 pool _
Landscaping 162,163 sq.f~. 30% I
Common and Pdwate Open 192,963 sq.~. 36%
Space
,,.i.., !
Total 496 units - 990 spaces
Clubhouse 2/10,761 sq.ft. 1% I
Ancillary Facilities: 91,322 sq.f~. 9%
Maintenance Buildings, etc.
Swimming Pool 2 pools - I
Total Landscap ng 343,130 sq.ft. 34%
Total Common and Private 407,530 sq.f~. 40% I
! Open Space
Source: FF Development, January 2001. i
R:%Pr~eCtS~.gF Dev%J001 .Addendurn-031~)1 .v4xl 4 Project Description I
I
'
I
/
EMPIRE LAKES /
GOLF COURSE I
I
,
NottoScale ....................................... L .... ' ........ 2=_'_'_'::_::'_'_'__'_"~-_--__-_--_-_=_--_-_-:=_ '_'_'Z_Z
Source: ARK Architects 1 F 0 U F{ T H "' li~
Site Plan
IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS "
CONSULTING
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
I 3.2.1 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS
As depicted in Exhibit 4, the apartment complex would be contemporary Craftsman in style.
I Individual apartment buildings would be three stodes in height. The pdmary exterior building
materials are clapboard siding and cement plaster finish, with tile roofs. Architectural articulation
would include the use of decorative railings, architectural elements housing stairwells, multi-pane~l
I windows, stone veneer accents, and gable brackets. A three-color scheme would be used to
provide additional design detail.
i The apartment units would be located in 23 rectangular-shaped buildings containing either four or
eight units, Site I containing 12 buildings and Site II containing 11 buildings. The individual three-
story apartment buildings would have two or three levels of apartment units. There would be two
levels of apartment units where enclosed, '"tuck under parking garages are provided.
I Site I is proposed for development with 260 apartment units, of which 156 are one bedroom units,
92 are two bedroom units, and 12 are three bedroom units. Site II is proposed for development
I with 236 apartment units, of which 132 are one bedroom units, 92 are two bedroom units, and 12
are three bedroom units. Each unit would have a patio or deck and laundry facilities (including a
washer and dryer).
I 3.2.2 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE CHARACTERISTICS
I Each of the two sites would include an approximately 5,300-square-foot clubhouse, located near
the project entrance in the northeastern comer of Site I, and in the southeastern comer of Site II,
also near the project entrance. Each clubhouse would include a community room, lounge,
i business center, and exercise room. A swimming pool, spa, and barbecue and picnic areas would
adjoin the clubhouse. Additionally, each of the two sites would have open lawn areas and seating
areas near the golf course.
I 3.2.3 PARKING
The proposed project requires 990 parking spaces, 489 spaces for Site I and 447 spaces for Site
I II. Resident parking would be provided in a combination of attached and detached garages,
covered carports, and open stalls. Table 2 provides additional information regarding project
parking requirements.
I 3.2.4 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
I Vehicular access to the project site would be provided from three locations. For Site I, the pdmary
entry would be via a new access road from Fourth Street into the project site; this would be a gated
entry. Secondary access for Site I would be directly off of Fourth Street and located at the
I southeastern comer of the site. Gated vehicular access for Site II would be from Fifth Street. For
emergency purposes, sites I and II would be connected via a locked emergency access gate in the
center of the two sites.
I Pathways through the project site would provide private pedestrian access within the individual
sites. Public sidewalks are located along Fourth Street.
I
I
Ironwood/Fain/ray Palms I
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
TABLE 2 I
PARKING STATISTICS
1 Br 156 Units X 1.5 Spaces/unit 234 Spaces 59 59 116
2 Br 92 Units X 1.8 Spaces/unit 166 Spaces 46 46 74 I
3 Br 12 Units X 2.0 Spaces/unit 24 Spaces 12 12 --
Guest Spaces 65 Spaces -- -- 65 I
Total 489 Spaces 117 117 255
I Br 132 Units X 1.5 Spaces/unit 198 Spaces 66 66 66
2 Br 92 Units X 1.8 Spaces/unit 166 Spaces 46 46 74 I
3 Br 12 Units X 2.0 Spaces/unit 24 Spaces 12 12 --
Guest Spaces 59 Spaces -- -- 59 I
Total 447 Spaces 124 124 199
Source: ARKArchitecture&planninii, March2001, i
Project Phasinq
The project is intended to be implemented as a single phase development. i
Approval Actions
i
The following approval actions by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are expected to include, but may
not be limited to the following:
· Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Sub-Area f 8 Amendment. This amendment would I
expand the previously approved IASP Sub-Area 18, Planning Area VI designation of Mixed-
Use to allow for residential uses, in addition to the currently permitted office, industrial, and I
commercial uses for the planning area.
· Development/Design Review-Residential I
· Grading Permit
· Building Permit I
I
I
81DE (STREET) ELEVATION - BUILDIN~I I-3 (PHASE I)
- =--'-- ~'~ '- - ...."-'-
.~- ,~' .~ ~.,..
.
Not to ~e
Source: ARK Architects
FRONT {STREET} ELEVATION BUILDIN6 I-3 (PHASE I)
Conc~pLu~] ~uildin~ Elevations ~ibit ~
IRONWOOD/FAIRWAY PALMS " ~~'
GONSULTING
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
I SECTION 4
COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
I The following provides a summary analysis of the environmental impacts previously identified in
the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan certified final EIR which included
development of Planning Area VI. A comparison of the identified impacts for the previously
i approved projectto the potential impacts associated with the currently proposed Ironwood/Fairway
Palms project is provided below.
As set forth more fully herein, the changes to the project site are minor and non-substantial. There
I would be no new significant impacts resulting from these changes, nor would there be any
substantial increase in the sevedty of any previously identified environmental impact that cannot
be mitigated. In addition, there would be no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
I under which the project would be undertaken which would require any revisions to the previously
certified Final EIR. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15164, an Addendum to the
previously certified IASP Final EIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the
i proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms residential development project.
4.1 . LAND USE
I 4.1.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
I Planning Area VI contains active grape vineyards (productive agricultural land) in the northern
portion of the site and a vacant field to the south. Development of this planning area would result
in the conversion of farmland to urban land uses and remove all vineyards from the site. The loss
i of vineyards and the conversion of farmland were identified in the final EIR as significant
unavoidable impacts associated with development of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan area, including
Planning Area VI. The vineyards would be removed by development of the project site. These
unavoidable impacts were overridden by City of Rancho Cucamonga in favor of the IASP Sub-Area
I 18 Specific Plan development goals and objectives.
As a part of certification of the IASP Sub-Area 18 final EIR and approval of the Sub-Area 18
I project, Planning Area VI was designated Mixed Use and approved for-development with up to
425,000 square feet of mixed use office/commercial development. These land uses were identified
as being compatible with existing and planned onsite and offsite surrounding land uses.
I Adopted Mitigation Program
I No feasible mitigation measures were available to mitigate the removal of active grape vineyards
from Planning Area VI. No other mitigation was required.
i 4.t .2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed project would allow for the development of Planning Area VI with multiple-family
i residential housing. Although residential development was not specifically proposed by the project
applicant when the IASP Sub-Area 18 final EIR was certified and the Specific Plan project
approved, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Mixed Use land use designation permits
residential uses. The proposed project would conform the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan to the
I General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use.
As with the previously approved project, implementation of residential development on the Planning
I Area VI site would remove grape vineyards and result in the loss of farmland. These significant,
unavoidable impacts were contemplated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in their approval of the
R:~Projec~s~FF DevU001 Addendur~O31SO1.wpd 7 Comparative Environmental Analysis
I
Ironwood/Fairway Palms I
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
IASP Sub-Area 18 project; the currently proposed project would not result in any new significant I
impacts associated with the loss of vineyards and farmland.
Existing and planned land uses surrounding the project site include the following: I
· To the north: Planning Area VIII and Empire LakesGolf Course.
· To the south: Fourth Street and vacant land outside of the Specific Plan area. I
· To the east: Planning Area VII and Milliken Avenue.
· To the west: Ernpire Lakes Golf Course (Planning Area I) I
The proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms high-density apartment project would allow for the I
continued integration of residences into the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan. The project is intended to
provide additional residential opportunities in this portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Mixed Use land use designation includes residential uses as i
one of the typical land uses within a mixed use project. The Mixed Use designation states that
"mixed use developments are ideally suited for land with n the downtown or adjacent to high activity
nodes along major transportation corridors." The proposed project site would provide residences I
within walking distance of the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station, employment centers, and
planned retail uses (Planning Area VIII), and is in close proximity to major freeway corridors. The
project site is also contiguous to the Empire Lakes Golf Course, which would provide residents of I
the proposed development with recreational opportunities and serves as an open space buffer.
4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION I
4.2.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
The tASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan final EIR traffic analysis identified that the Specific Plan I
project would generate approximately 64,011 average daily tdps (ADT), with 7,648 trips dudng the
p.m. peakhour. Ofthesevehiculartdps, theapprovedmixofland uses for Planning Area VI would
generate 4, 190 ADT (approx mate y 6.5 percent of the total project ADT),-with 588 tdps dudng the I
a.m. peak hour and 540 trips dudng the p.m. peak hour (approximately 7.1 percent of the total
project p.m. peak tdps). However, it should be noted that since certification of the final EIR and
adoption of the Specific: Plan, changes in the intensity of development and/or mix of land uses I
within some of the planning areas have occurred resulting in an overall reduction in the total
vehicular tdps associated with the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan area. Table 3 identifies the trip rates
and trip generation for the approved Planning Area VI land uses. I
TABLE 3
PLANNING AREA Vl I
EXISTING TRIP GENERATION
! !iA~M~ ~Hour P~M. Peak Hour I
La.d~ ~ ib !~ T~b~ b out Tot~: ADT
Mixed Use 425 TSF 523 65 588 92 448 540 4,190 I
Office/Commercial
ADT = Average Daily Tdps
TSF = thousand square feet I
R:'~PrOjeCtS',FF Dev~J(X]l/~enciurn4~190'l .wpd 8 Cornparetive Environmental Analysis I
I Imnwood/Fainvay Palms
Addendurn to a Previously Certified EIR
I On a cumulative basis, the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan final EIR identified that, at project
buildout, implementation of the Sub-Area 18 project would incrementally contribute to significant
impacts to five intersections within the traffic study area:
I · Haven Avenue/Arrow Route
· Archibald Avenue/Fourth Street
i · Milliken Avenue/Fourth Street
· Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard
· Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route
I The final EIR noted that the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan project would contribute to significant
unavoidable impacts to the regional circulation system. These unavoidable impacts were
overridden by City of Rancho Cucamonga in favor of the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan
I development goals and objectives.
Adopted Mitiaation Proaram
I Mitigation adopted as a condition of approval for the previously approved project is as follows:
I · The Sub-Area Specific Plan shall contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's
adopted traffic impact fee program (Transportation Development impact Fee Ordinance No.
445) as the project's fair share contribution to circulation improvements identified as
I necessary at the time of issuance of building permits.
4.2.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
I Project Trio Generation
Table 4 identifies the tdp generation rate and the resulting tdp generation for the proposed project
I and compares the trip generation to the previously approved land uses for the Planning Area.
Based on these tdp generation estimates, the proposed apartment project would generate 3,288
average daily trips (ADT), with 253 a.m. peak hour and 307 p.m. peak hour tdps. The previously
I approved land uses for Planning Area VI were expected to generate 4,190 ADT, with 588 tdps
dudng the a.m. peak hour and 540 tdps dudng the p.m. peak hour. Therefore, the proposed
project represents the following reduction in total daily traffic and p.m. peak hour traffic when
I compared to the previously approved project: 902 ADT, 335 a.m. peak hour tdps, and 233 p.m.
peak hour tdps, respectively. The proposed project represents approximately five percent of the
total Sub-Area 18 ADT and four percent of the total Sub-Area 18 p.m. peak hour tdps. (Note: A.M.
I peak hour trips were not available for the Specific Plan Sub-Area 18.) As previously discussed,
total vehicular trips associated with buildout of Sub-Area 18 are expected to be less than assumed
in the final EIR.
I Site Access
i Access to the project site would be provided from Fourth Street (two access points) and Fifth Street
(one access point). As a part of the proposed project, the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would
be amended to eliminate the planned extension of Fifth Street from its existing terminus at the
eastern boundary of Planning Area VI to Fourth Street. The reduction in traffic volumes associated
I with the proposed apartment project would not adversely im pact the distribution of vehicular traffic;
therefore, no impacts associated with the proposed roadway deletion is expected.
I
i R:',Pr~ects'~F OevU001 Addendur~O~Se~ .wpd 9 Comparative Environmental Analysis
Ironw~I/Faitway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
TABLE 4
'If'RIP RATE AND TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
Apa .o.ts ' I 495d"'1 '4°1 213[ 2531 2081 991 30713,288
~a~ments I d~ 0.08 [ 0.43 [ 1.38 0.42 0.20 0.62 6.63
0.51
M~ed Use TSF 1.23 0.15 0.~ 1.05 1.27 9.86
~/Commerdal
TSF: thousand square ~t
For Site I, the pdma~ ac~ss would ~ from Fou~h Street, at the end of an ac~ss road/cul~e-sac
which would sewe the proje~ site and the adjoining ~mmercial site. This Fou~h Street entran~
is expe~ed to accommodate approximately ~o-thirds of the proje~ traffic and would provide a
minimum of 110 feet of stacking distan~ be~een the cul~e-sac and the proje~ d~ve aisle. For
Site II, prima~ ac~ss would ~ from Fifth Street at the noah end of the proje~ site and would
provide a ~nne~ion to Milliken Avenue. This entran~ would sewe approximately onethird of the
project traffic and would provide a minimum of 75 feet of stacking be~een Fifth Street and the
proje~ ddve aisle. Traffic movement at both of the a~ss points would be ~ntmlled by stop
signs.
Mitigation Program
No new mitigation is required as a pad of the proposed proje~ bemuse the amount of traffic
generated by the proposed residential development is less than the amount of traffic that was
expe~ed to ~ generated by the previously approved land uses for Planning Area VI. The
mitigation program adopted as ~nditions of approval for the Planning Area VI of IASP Sub-Area
18 Specific Plan proje~ and set fo~h in the Development Agreement Be~een the City of Rancho
Cu~monga and General Dynami~ Corporation Confining Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, July 6,
19~, is appli~ble to the cu~ently proposed proje~. The appli~ble condition is as follows:
· The proje~ appli~nt shall ~ responsible for the payment of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Transpo~ation Development Fee (City Ordinan~ No. ~5; City Council
Resolution No. 91-092). The fee shall not ex~ed $1,710.05 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit
including City ow}~ead.
4.3 NOISE
4.3.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
The potential for noise impa~s are ~pi~lly evaluated for sho~-te~ constation noise and Iong-
te~ operational noise. Construeion noise generally represents a sho~-te~ impa~ on ambient
noise levels. Noise generated by construeion equipment and constation a~ivities ~n reach high
levels, ranging from approximately 65 dBA to 105 dBA at a distan~ of 50 feet from the sours,
I Imnw(xx~lFainfay Palms
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
I depending on the type of equipment being used. Pile ddving noise levels are the highest noise
levels associated with construction; however, pile drivers would not have been required for the
Planning Area VI land uses. Grading activities generally have the next highest levels of noise. At
I 50 feet, grading activities commonly have average noise levels (e.g., Leq noise levels) of 85 dBA
with maximum noise levels as high as 95 dBA. General construction is considered to be quieter
than grading operations. The same peak noise levels are often reached dudng general
i construction as dudng grading, but the average noise levels are 5 to 10 dBA less. Because
sensitive receptors are not present in the project vicinity, the final EIR did not ident fy any significant
construction-related noise impacts.
I Several rating scales have been developed for the analysis of adverse effects of community noise
on people. The potential for noise to impact people is dependent on the total acoustical energy
content of the noise. A number of noise scales have been developed to evaluate noise impacts.
I These scales include the Equivalent Noise Level (LEO) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL). Both of these scales are based upon the A-weighted decibel, which is abbreviated as
dBA. The A-weighted decibel compensates specific frequencies to match the way in which the
I human ear perceives them. Simply stated, dBA is a description of how people judge the loudness
of sound.
I Ldn is a day-night average sound level. The day-night sound level is a measure of the cumulative
noise exposure in the community. It results from the summation of an average noise level
determined over a 24-hour time period with a weighing factor applied dudng the night time period
I (10 p.m, to 7 a.m.).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Noise Element indicates that the 'normally
acceptablen extedor noise levels for office development and industrial development is 70 dBA
i CNEL or less, and "conditionally acceptable" noise levels are 70 to 75 dBA CNEL.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code states, with respect to office and commercial
I activities:
· All commercial and office activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an extedor
I noise level of 60 dBA dudng the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., and 65 dBA during the hours
of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Loading and unloading activities are not allowed during the hours of
10 p.m. to 7 a.m. if such activities would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.
I (Source: City of Rancho Cucam onga Development Code, Section 17.10.050, Performance
Standards in NOISE ZONE II.)
I Further, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has noise standards for land uses within the IASP area.
Planning Area VI is designated a Class A area. Applicable Class A noise performance standards
are as follows:
I · Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use shall not exceed 65 Ldn as
measured at the lot line of the lot containing the use. Where a structure is occupied by
more than one use, the noise level shall not be in excess of 60 dBA Ldn as measured within
I the intedor space of the neighboring establishment. Noise caused by motor vehicles and
trains are exempted from this standard.
I Community noise assessment changes in noise levels greater than 3 dBA are often identified as
significant, while changes less than 1 dBA are not discernible, In the range of 1 to 3 dBA, people
who are very sensitive to noise may perceive a slight change. No scientific evidence is available
I to support the use of 3 dBA as a significance threshold. In laboratory testing situations, humans
are able to detect noise level changes of slightly less than 1 dBA. However, in a community noise
i R:~Projects~FF Dev~J001 Addendun,,031901 .v4xl 11 Cemparet/ve Environmental Analysis
IronwoocYFainvay Palms I
Addenclum to a Previously Certified EIR
situation, the noise exposure is over a long time pedod and changes in noise levels occur over I
years, rather than the immediate comparison made in a laboratory situation. Therefore, the level
at which changes in community noise levels become discernible is likely to be some value greater
than 1 dBA, and 3 dBA appears to be most appropriate for most people. I
The IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan final EIR noted that vehicular traffic noise levels adjacent to
Planning Area VI along Fourth Street would be significant for outdoor activity areas. All office, I
industrial, and/or retail outdoor activity areas within the 70 dBA Ldn noise contour would have to
be shielded. Onsite operational noise associated with loading and unloading activities at the office,
industrial, and/or commercial land uses was not identified as a significant impact. I
Adopted Mitigation Proqram
Mitigation measures adopted as conditions of approval for the previously approved project, I
applicable to Planning Area VI, are as follows:
· Construction equipment and trucks shall be propedy muffled. I
· Development of the project site shall be in conformance with the Performance Standards
identified in the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan. !
· A detailed noise impact analysis shall be conducted for new onsite commercial or industrial
development with the potential of generating high outdoor noise levels in outdoor areas of I
existing golf course areas.
· Active outdoor use areas associated with office, commercial, and industrial activities shall I
be placed outside of the 70 dBA Ldn centours from vehicular and rail traffic, and industrial
activities. Any active outdoor uses associated with office, commercial, and industrial
activities within the 70 dBA Ldn area are required to be shielded from the dominant noise
source, by using sound barrier walls or structures acting as effective sound barriers, to I
ensure conformance with the City's noise standard.
· A detailed noise impact analysis shall be conducted for new onsite commercial or industrial I
development with the potential of generating high outdoor noise levels in outdoor areas of
existing office, commercial, and industrial areas.
· Pdor to issuance of a building permit, all commercial and industrial structures shall be I
designed outside of the 70 dBA Ldn area. If such structures are designed within 70 dBA
Ldn contour from any noise sources, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction I
requirements shall be made and needed noise insulation features shall be included in the
design.
4.3.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT I
A noise study was prepared for the proposed project by RKJK & Associates, Inc. The findings of I
the study are summadz,.=d below; the study is included in its entirety as Appendix A to this report.
The City of Rancho C:ucamonga General Plan Noise Element indicates that the "normally
acceptable" extedor noise level for multiple-family residential development is 60 dBA CNEL or less, I
and "conditionally acceptable" noise levels are 60 to 70 dBA CNEL.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.02.120 notes that all single-family I
and multi-family residential properties are categodzed as NOISE ZONE I land uses:
R:'~PrOjeCtS~,FF Dev~001 Addendun-~lS01 .v~d 12 Cempamtive Environmental Analysis I
I IronSairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
i · The maximum allowable extedor noise levels in residential areas shall be 55 dBA between
10 p.m. and 7 a.m., and 60 dBA between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. The maximum allowable
intedor noise levels for residential uses are 40 dBA between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., and 45
i dBA between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. (Source: City of Rancho Cucemonga Development Code,
Section 17.10.080, Performance Standards in NOISE ZONE I.)
· Intedor noise levels for multi-family residences are regulated by Title 24 of the State
I Building Code. The maximum permissible intedor noise level is 45 CNEL. The Building
Code further specifies that when exterior noise levels exceed 60 CNEL, a detailed analysis
must be performed to ensure that the interior noise levels meet the 45 CNEL interior
I standard.
Project Generated Noise
I Ongoing activities associated with maintenance and occupation of the residential and open space
areas would be subject to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance (City Code Sections
I 17.10.050, 17.080, and 17.02.120). For residential land uses, the Noise Ordinance limits the 1-
hour average sound level at the property line to 60 dBA between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., and 55 dBA
between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Noise levels generated by activities within the project site are not
i expected to exceed noise levels specified in the Noise Ordinance. Average noise levels would not
exceed ordinance requirements; no significant impacts are expected.
i In order to determine the existing noise environment and determine the potential for noise impacts
to residential development, noise measurements were taken at three locations.
· Measurement Location 1: Adjacent to the proposed Clubhouse/Leasing building
I · Measurement Location 2: Near the second emergency entry to Site II
· Measurement Location 3: Approximately 25 feet from the curb of Milliken Avenue
I Measurement Locations 1 and 2 are located on the proposed project site for Ironwood/Fairway
Palms, while the third measurement location is located to the east on the adjacent Planning Area
VII, proposed for commercial and retail development.
I In order to evaluate future onsite noise impacts, noise measurements were taken at facilities
containing similar wholesale/retail uses as those proposed for Planning Area VII, adjacent to the
I project site. Future on-site automobile generated noise measurements were also taken at an
equivalent facility. Existing noise levels plus project noise at these measurement locations are
identified in Table 5.
I TABLE 5
EXISTING NOISE LEVELS
I 1 51.4 51.6 0.2
2 49.4 50.0 0.6
3 62.0 - -
I Source: RKJK &Associates, Inc., August 2000; December 2000.
I
R:~J;h~jects~FF De~J001 Ad~N'tdum-031901 .wlxt 13 Comparative Environmental Analysis
I
Ironw~l/Fain4/ay Palms I
Addendum to a Previously Centified EIR
Construction GeneratE;d Noise I
Short-term construction noise represents a short-term impact on ambient noise levels. Noise
generated by construction equipment, including trucks, graders, bulldozers, concrete mixers, and
portable generators can reach high levels. G~ading activitiestypically represent one ofthe highest I
. potential sources for noise impacts. The most effective method of controlling construction noise
.is through ocal control of construction hours and by limiting the hours of construction to normal
weekday working hours. I
Traffic~enerated Noise
Noise contours represent the distance to noise levels of a constant value and are measured from i
the canter of the roadway. Table 6 identifies the CNEL at 1 O0 feet for existing and future (201 O)
conditions. I
TABLE 6
FUTURE NOISE LEVEL INCREASES I
Fourth Street, west of Milliken Avenue 62.9 68.6 5.7
Fourth Street, east of Milliken Avenue 65.0 68.6 3.6 I
Milliken Avenue, north of Fourth Street 65.0 69.1 4.1
Milliken Avenue, south of Fourth Street 65.0 69.2 4.2 i
1-15, north of Fourth Street 84.2 86.4 2.2
I-15, south of Fourth Street 84.7 86.2 1.4
1-10, west of Fourth Street 85.5 86.4 0.9 I
Source: RKJK & Associates, August 2000; December 2000.
Mitigation Program I
The mitigation program is proposed to mitigate potential noise impacts upon proposed residential I
uses to the maximum beg ree feasible. With implementation of the following mitigation, residences
within Planning Area VI would be considered acceptable to conditionally acceptable land uses.
· Construct a six-foot high sound barrier for all the first floor extedor patio areas and I
balconies on the .,second and third floors in buildings facing Fourth Street. Sound barriers
shall be solid wall construction or a combination of solid wall and '/4-inch glazing or lexan I
construction.
· The intedor noise exposure standards for the project will be met using the standard building
shell construction and a "windows closed" condition for buildings facing Fourth Street I
requiring a means of mechanical ventilation per UBC requirements. This mechanical
ventilation system shall supply two air changes per hour for each habitable room, with a
minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per occupant. The fresh air inlet duct I
shall be of sound attenuating construction and shall consist of a minimum of ten feet of
straight or curved duct or six feet plus one sharp 90 degree bend.
I
R:';',~,~.L.;F De~J001 Ac~em~uf~031SO1..~xI 14 Comparative Environmental Analysis I
I Imnwood/l=airway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
I · Provide upgraded windows with a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 29
for all windows in buildings facing Fourth Street. For proper acoustical performance, all
extedor windows, doors and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal, and leaks and
I cracks must be kept down to minimum.
· Dudng construction, the project shall comply with recommendations found in the sub-area
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report that includes the following noise mitigation
I measures:
- Construction activity shall be limited to 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through
I Saturday, unless a permit for each work areas has been issued by the Director of Public
Works, or no noise-sensitive receptors would be exposed to the construction noise.
I - Mufflers on construction equipment and trucks shall meet the manufacturers
recommended specifications for operation and maintenance.
I - Development of the project site shall be in conformance with the Performance
Standards identified in the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan.
I In summary, the proposed project is expected to exceed both the interior and exterior noise
standards set forth by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project would achieve the
45 dBA CNEL limit for interior noise standards and the 65 dBA CNEL limit for extedor noise
I standards upon implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.
4.4 AIR QUALITY
I 4.4.t PREVIOUS APPROVED PROJECT
Potential short-term construction-related air quality impacts and long-term operational impacts were
I assessed in the IASP Sub-Area Specific Plan final EIR for the overall project. Construction and
operational emissions are considered by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct
(SCAQMD) to be signfficant if they exceed the thresholds shown in Table 7. In addition to the
I thresholds identified in the table, an increase in carbon monoxide concentrations in an area that
already exceeds national or state CO standards is also considered significant if the increase
exceeds one part per million (ppm) for a 1-hour average or 0.45 ppm for an 8-hour average.
I TABLE 7
EMISSION THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCEa'
~rations
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 24.75 550
Sulfur Oxides (SO,) 150 6.75 150
I Nitrogen Oxides (NO,) 100 2.5 55
Particulate Matter (PM~o) 150 6.75 150
I Reactive O~ganic Compounds (ROC) 75 2.5 55
a. T~xicemissi~ns~mc~nsideredslgn~c~nt~fthey~x~~sesen~itiverecept~rst~acancerdsk~f1 in 1 rniliionor
10 in I million if best available control technology for toxics (T-BACT) is employed.
Source: South Coast CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993.
I
iR:',PrOjeC~FF OevUCOl Add~dum-O3~90~.wpd 15 COmparative Environmental Analysis
Ironwood/Fairway Palms I
Acldendum to a Previously Certified EIR
Construction Impacts I
The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook estimates that each acre of disturbed soil creates 26.4
pounds/day of PM~.. On a worst-case basis of the entire 23.4-acre Planning Area VI site
undergoing grading on one day, daily emissions were estimated to be 618 pounds of PM~o on the I
peak day, pdor to mitigation. Employee vehicles and equipment emissions would have also
resulted in carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, reactive organic compound, and sulfur oxide
emissions. Construction-related carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide emissions would be I
significant. These unavoidable impacts were overridden by City of Rancho Cucamonga in favor
of the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan development goals and objectives.
~acts I
Mobile sources of regional emissions associated with Planning Area VI would include employee I
and visitor vehicle use and the use of electricity and natural gas. Operational emissions from the
proposed Planning Area VI would have been approximately 427 pounds per day (Ibs/day) of carbon
monoxide, 47 Ibs/day of nitrogen oxides, 3.9 Ibs/day of particulate matter, and 42 Ibs/day of I
reactive organic compounds. The project's generation of these pollutants would not exceed the
SCAQMD thresholds.
Localized carbon monoxide emissions at intersections (i.e., 'hot spots") associated with the Sub- I
Area Specific Plan would be lower than baseline levels and would not result in the exposure of
sensitive receptors to unhealthful concentrations of carbon monoxide.
The IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan final EIR noted that the project would help to implement the I
regional growth management policy through a reduction in vehicle trips, and an improved
jobs/housing balance. Moreover, the impacts of the project are generally within those forecast in I
the Air Quality Management Plan for the subregion. Therefore, the project would not increase
projected exceedances of air quality standards, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay
timely attainment of air quality standards. I
Implementation of office and/or commercial land uses on Planning Area VI was not expected to
generate toxic pollutants. Moreover, the site is not located within 0.25 miJe of a source of toxic I
emissions.
Adooted Mitigation Proaram I
Mitigation measures adopted as conditions of approval for the previously approved project,
applicable to Planning Area VI, are as follows: I
· The following SCAQMD mitigation measures were incorporated into the project. To reduce
particulate emissions from paved and unpaved roads, and construction activities, the
project applicant shall: I
1. Use low-emission alternative fuel (i.e., methanoi, butane, or propane) as practicable in
mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractor, scraper, dozer). I
2. Develop a trip reduction plan to achieve 1.5 AVR for construction employees.
3. Water site and clean equipment morning and evening, at least twice daily. I
4. Spread soil binders onsite, and on unpaved roads and parking areas. '1
R:~,,~j~;F 0ev~J001 Adder~lun~O31SOl.v~ 16 ColTlparatjve Environmental Analysis I
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
I 5. Comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 concerning implementation of dust
suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance offsite.
I 6. Employ construction activity management techniques, such as extending the
construction period, reducing the number of pieces of equipment used simultaneously,
increasing the distance between emission sources, reducing or changing the hours of
i construction, and scheduling activity during off-peak hours.
7. Sweep streets if silt is corded over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
8. Suspend grading operations during first and second stage smog alerts.
9. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as nstantaneous gusts) exl':eed 25
miles per hour. ~,
1 O. Wash off trucks leaving the site and cover all loads of loose material.
I 11. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them adequately tuned. J
I 12. Use Iow-sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment.
13. Use existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generato s ratr!~e than
r ~ r
i temporary power generators.
14. Use low-emission onsite equipment (e.g., methanoi-, propane-, or butane-~}owered
I internal combustion engines) instead of diesel or gasoline.
· To reduce automobile emissions by reducing the number of vehicles ddven to a work site
on a daily basis, the project appticont shall: ,
15. Provide Iocol shuttle services, and access to regional transit systems and transit
shelters. ;
16. Work with the City of Rancho Cucomonga to develop and implement a TDM or,':tinance.
The project shall also comply with the requirements of the TDM ordinance. ,
17. Ensure efficient parking management. ,
I 18. Provide preferential parking to high-occupancy vehicles and shuttle services.
· To reduce vehicular emissions through traffic flow improvements, the project :;ipplicont
i shall:
19. Configure parking to minimize traffic interference.
,i 20. Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes.
21. Provide a flagperson to guide traffic and ensure safety at construction sites.
I 22. Schedule operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours.
i R:',PrC~C~S',FF De'AJO0~ A~x~m~3~901,w~d 17 Cemparet/ve Environmental Analysis
Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
23. Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities.
The plan may' include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation, and
satellite parking areas with a shuttle service.
24. Schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours.
25. Provide dedicated tum lanes as appropriate.
· To reduce stationary emissions of operation-related activities, the project applicant shall:
26.Require development practices that maximize energy conservation as a prerequisite to
permit approval.
27. Improve the thermal integrity of buildings, and reduce the thermal load with automated I
time clocks or occupant sensors.
28 ntroduce window glazing, wall insulation, and efficient ventilation methods. I
29. Introduce energy-efficient heating and cooling appliances, such as water heaters,
cooking equipment, refrigerators, air conditioners, fumaces, and boiler units. i
30. Incorporate appropriate passive solar design and solar heaters.
31. Use devices that minimize the combustion of fossil fuels. I
32. Capture waste heat and re-employ it in nonresidential buildings. i
33. Landscape building and median landscape areas with native drought-resistant species,
as appropriate, to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. -.-
· To protect sensitive land uses from major sources of toxic air pollution, the project applicant I
shall:
34. ReqUire design features, operating procedures, preventive maintenance, operator I
training, and E;mergency response planning to prevent the release of toxic pollutants,
as appropriate. i
35. Ensure compliance with notification and asbestos removal procedures outlined in
SCAQMD Rule 1403 to reduce asbestos-related air quality impacts and health hazards. I
4.4.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
Construction ImPacts i
The currently proposed project would have the same grading impacts as would the previously
approved project. Under both deve opment scenarios, the same amount of area would be graded. i
O erational Im acts
I
The proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms project would result in reduced but similar operational air
quality emissions when compared to the previously appreved project for Planning Area VI. The
proposed project would generate less vehicular traffic than the approved office, industrial, and I
commercial uses for the planning area. SCAQMD thresholds would not be exceeded.
R:'~PrOjectS~FF Dev~J001 Add,., ~dum-031901 ,wpd 18 Comparative Environmental Analysis I
I Ironwo{:x~/Faifway Palms
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
Mitigation Program
The previously adopted mitigation program for Planning Area VI would apply to the proposed
project, where applicable for residential development. No additional mitigation is required.
4~5 EARTH RESOURCES
I 4.5.t PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
I A strong seismically induced ground shaking event could affect the project site during the
operational lifetime of the development. To reduce the potential impacts associated with
seismically induced ground shaking on the project site to a level considered less than significant,
structures would be designed in accordance with the seismic requirements of the Uniform Building
i Code.
The potential for erosion on the project site is considered to be moderate where vegetation cover
is present (i.e., existing grape vineyards) (source: Soil Conservation Service, 1980). Dust storms
are known to occur within the region in which the project site is located. However, due to the high
permeability and low shrink-swell potential associated with the soils present on the project site,
I significant erosion impacts are not expected.
Root and stock material may have been disposed of at shallow depths on the project site in the
I areas of the existing grape vineyard operations. The uncovering, collection, and disposal of these
materials dudng grading activities from development of the project site would reduce the potential
impacts from the settlement of these materials.
i Adopted Mitigation Program
i Mitigation measures adopted as conditions of approval for the previously approved project,
applicable to Planning Area VI, are as follows:
i · Similar to all development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, structures to be
constructed under the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan would be required to comply with
all local and state development standards (grading permits, Alquist-Pdolo Zone Act of 1972,
Uniform Building Code, etc.). As typically required for individual developments within the
I IASP prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following is a mitigation measure to
reduce the potential impact of seismic settlement and differential compaction in the project
site under the development of the proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan to a level considered
I less that significant:
- Pdor to the issuance of a grading permit, a subsurface geotechnical investigation shall
I be conducted to determine the likelihood of seismic settlement and differential
compaction on the project site. Findings of this investigation shall be submitted to the
City and grading operations shall adhere to the recommendations identified in the
I geotechnical report.
4.5.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
I A geotechnical report was prepared for the project site by LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. in June
2000. The findings of the report are summarized below and the report is included in its entirety as
I Appendix B.
I R:~Projects~cF Dev~J001 A(Ickmdum-031901 .wpd 19 Comparative Environmental Analysis
Ironwood/Fairway Palms I
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
Soils and Geoloqy I
Approximately 25 exploratory bodngs were drifted on Planning Area VI to depths ranging from 16.5
feet to 51.5 feet. Planning Area VI is underlain by relatively fine grained alluvial materials of silty I
sand, with some silt, clay, and coarser materials of sand and gravel. The northern portion of the .
site a thin surficial veneer of silty sand and organic materials; below the surficial topsoil is alluvial'
· materials composed pdrnary of silty sand with vadous amounts of fine gravel and silt and some I
sand with gravel (at depths ranging from seven to 15 feet). Subsurface materials were damp and
became denser with increasing depth. The most southern portion of the site contains fill materials,
ranging in depth from two to five feet. Underlying the fill material is alluvial materials similarto that !
encountered in the northem portion of the planning area.
In its present condition, onsite development could result in unacceptable differential and/or overall
settlement. Recompaction of soil materials and adherence to geotechnical recommendations and 'i
state and local requirements would provide adequate support for building foundations.
Groundwater was not present in borings to a depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. !
In the vicinity of the project site, groundwater was measured at a depth of 362 feet below the
ground surface in a groundwater well.
Based on site-specific subsurface geotechnical investigation of the project site, no new significant I
impacts are anticipated.
Seismicit,/ I
The project site is located in southern California, a known seismically active area. No active faults
pass beneath the site, nor is it located within a designated Alquist-Pdolo Earthquake Fault Zone.
Therefore, there is little potential for surface fault rupture. However, the presence of regional faults
within a 60-mile radius of the site creates a potential for strong ground motions at the site. The I
nearest known active fault is the Cucamonga Fault located approximately 5.6 miles to the north.
The next closest fault is the San Jacinto Fault located approximately 11 miles to the northeast. No
new significant impacts are anticipated.
As stated before, the depth of groundwater on the project site is in excess of 50 feet below the ~,
existing ground surface. This factor indicates that the potential for liquefaction is virtually
nonexistent. I
Mitiaation Program
In addition to adopted mitigation in the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan EIR, the recommendations of '!
the geotechnical investigation prepared for this Addendum shall be implemented as a part of the
project to reduce any potential impacts to a level that is considered less than significant. I
Recommendations address:
· Removal and recompaction of soils !
· Conformance to the Uniform Building Code
· Foundation and pavement design
· Construction monitoring I
· Building maintenance and site drainage
I
R:~Projects%FF DevUCOI Addendum-O31901.vtpd 20 Comparative Environmental Analysis I
I Ironwood/Fai~ay Palms
AdderSurn to a Previously ~er~i~ed EIR
I 4.6 HYDROLOGY/DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY
4.6.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
I Hydrolofly and Drainafie
I · Existing surface water runoff drains to the south in a sheet flow effect. Development of the Sub-
Area 18 Specific Plan project, inclusive of Planning Area VI, would increase impervious surfaces
and surface water runoff. However, master planned downstream drainage facilities have been
I designed to accommodate the buildout of General Plan land uses, including the Sub-Area 18
Specific Plan area.
i Groundwater
The City of Rancho Cucamonga ovedies two groundwater basins, the Cucemonga Basin and the
Chino Basin. The Specific Plan area overlies the central portion of the Chino Basin. The basin is
recharged pdmadlyfrom rainfall and stormwater runoff. The IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan EIR
noted that overall development of the Specific Plan may include the use of g roundwater resources.
Withdraw of groundwater within the Chino Basin would require a well permit from the Chino Basin
I Municipal Water District.
Water Quality
I Short-term water quality impacts could occur on the project site from grading operations during the
rainy season and cause erosion and the transport of silt in downstream surface water flows. Long-
I term impacts could occur from the transport of urban constituents (i.e., oil, grease, tire particles)
within onsite surface flows. Due to the depth of groundwater in the area, no impacts to
groundwater quality is expected.
I Adopted Mitigation Pro,qram
i Mitigation measures adopted as conditions of approval for the previously approved project,
applicable to Planning Area VI, are as follows:
Similar to development that would be allowed on the project site under the existing IASP,
I vadous storm drain improvements will be installed, as development of the proposed Sub-
Area Specific Plan progresses, to convey the post-development onsite storm flows into the
existing storm drain facilities adjacent to the site. The proposed storm drain facilities will
I be sized and located to conform to the City's current storm flow conveyance policy. No
additional drainage measures are required.
· Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for development of structures, erosion control
measures that include Best Management Practices (BMPs) and compliance with NPDES
stormwater quality requirements shall be included within construction plans.
4.6.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
i Runoff from the project s te would continue to drain to the south, consistent with existing conditions.
Improvements would consist of an onsite collection system that would divert the flows to the
adjacent facilities.
I As with the previously approved land uses for Planning Area VI, the currently proposed project
would result in the introduction of impervious surfaces to the project site. Open space within the
i R:~ects~F Dev~J001 Adden(~u~031901 ,v~d 21 Comparative Environmental Analysis
Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
proposed apartment complex would allow for continued percolation within the planning area.
Development of this project would result in the same amount or a reduction in impervious surfaces
as the approved Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan forthe project site, and therefore the same amount of
surface water flow. A:s with the previously adopted land uses for Planning Area VI, this project
would result in a similar incremental decrease in the quality of surface water. Like the proposed
Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, this project would not significantly affect downstream facilities.
Groundwater quality would not be affected either by this project or the approved Sub-Area 18
Specffic Plan.
Mitioation Program
The previously adopted mitigation program for Planning Area VI is applicable to the proposed
project. No additional mitigation is required.
4.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
4.7.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
Implementation of urban land uses on Planning Area VI would result in the removal of grape
vineyards, a non-native habitat. Dudng biological surveys conducted for the IASP Sub-Area 18
Specific Plan EIR, two Category 2 candidate species for federal listing as threatened or
endangered, the San Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillel~ and loggerhead
shdke (Laniusludovicianus), were observed within Planning Area VI. The removal of these species
from the site was not considered significant because of the project site's isolation from important
natural open space areas, high amount of human disturbance, and lack of native plant
communities.
The Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF) was not found on the site during focused surveys
(BonTerra Consulting, 1998), and due to the lack of suitable soils (John A. Sayere and Associates,
1998) and the lack of plants that flower dudng the specie's flight pedod, Sub-Area 18 appears
unsuitable for DSFLF. The site is regularly y discad to comply with San Bemardino County's weed
abatement policies, thE;raby reducing this area's ability to support DSFLF. In summary, the lack
of true Delhi series soils, the percent coverage of the vegetation as well as the regular weed
abatementJdiscing of the areas between the grapevines, renders the site unsuitable for DSFLF
habitation. Impacts to the DSFLF are therefore not expected from project implementation due to
the lack of appropdate soils and vegetation conditions, as well as the adjacency of the existing golf
course and commercial and industrial development.
Adopted Mitiaation Pro~qram
No signif]cent impacts on biological resources would occur; no mitigation was required.
4.7.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
Implementation of the proposed apartment project would result in the same amount of habitat
removal as would occur with the previously approved land uses for Planning Area VI. No significant
impacts to biological resources are expected.
Miti.clation Pro¢lram
No mitigation is required.
R:~:~eCIs',FF 0ev',J001 Ad~endurl~031901 .v, pd 22 Comparative Environmental Analysis
Imnwood/Fainvay Palms
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
4.8 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
4.8.1 WATER SUPPLY
Previously Aoproved Project
Development of the 23.4-acre site with office, industrial, and commercial land uses was projected
to generate a demand for approximately 70,200 gallons per day of water. Project water demand
could be met by the Cucamonga County Water District. No significant impacts were anticipated.
Adopted Mitigation Program
No mitigation measures are required. However, incorporation of the following measures would
conserve water supplies and reduce impacts to the region's water resources:
· All toilet, shower, and faucet fixtures shall be of an "ultra low-flow' nature.
· Onsite landscaping shall use water-conserving plant material.
· Automatic landscaping irrigation systems shall be used.
· Automatic shut-off faucets shall be used in offices/commercial/retail facilities.
· Landscaping and irrigation systems shall be designed to conserve water through the
principles of Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code.
Currently Proposed Project
The project site lies within the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD). Development of
Planning Area VI with residential uses would increase demand of water from approximately 70,200
gallonsperdaytoapproximately94,329gallonsperday. TheWaterDistricthasindicateditsability
to serve the proposed project; there is adequate supply of water available to meet the needs of this
proposed development, including fire flow requirements.
Mitigation Program
The adopted mitigation program for the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan project is applicable to the
currently proposed Planning Area VI project, with the following deletion:
· Automatic shut-off faucets shall be used in offices/commercial/retail facilities.
4.8.2 WASTEWATER
Previously Approved Project
Development of the 23.4-acre project site would generate approximately 74,880 gallons per day
of wastewater. The Cucamonga County Water District indicated the existing wastewater system
in the project area was adequate to serve the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan project.
~:~rojec~FF Oe~co~ A~e~dum-03~S0~ .~d 23 Comparative Environmental Analysis
ImnwoocYFaitway Palms I
Addendum to a Previously Certified Eli?,
Adopted Mitigation Program I
· Development of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan would require payment of fees in
accordance with the Cucemonga County Water District wastewater facility fee program. I
· Currently Proposed Project
The Cucamonga County Water District anticipates the existing sewer system and sewage I
treatment plant cepacity to be adequate for the proposed housing project. This project would
increase the generation of wastewater from approximate y 74,880 gallons to 150,838 gallons per '1
day because of higher generation rates associated with residential development when compared
to office, industrial, and commercial development. This increase is not expected to significantly
affect master planned wastewater facilities.
Mitigation Program I
The adopted mitigation program forthe IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan project is applicable to the
currently proposed Planning Area VI project. _
4.8.3 SOLID WASTE !
Previously ADoroved Project
Development of Planning Area VI with office, industrial, and commercial uses would result in the I
generation of approximately 6.05 tons per day of solid waste. While development of the planning
area would increase existing solid waste generation, the development of the Sub-Area Specific I'
Plan would be required to comply with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element and
City-approved source reduction and recycling programs. No significant impacts were identified.
Adopted Mitigation Program I
· The project applicant shall implement a source reduction and recycling program for the '1
proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan which may include the following:
- Provide recycling facilities that allow paper, metal, plastic and glass to be separated.
- Compost green waste. I
- Use minimal maintenance plants for landscaping.
Currently Proposed Proje~-t I
Development of Planning Area VI with residential uses would not significantly impact existing and
future solid waste facilities. The proposed project would generate approximately 2.3 tons per day !
of solid waste, a 62 percent reduction when compared to approved land uses for Planning Area VI.
Mitigation Program I
The mitigation program aclopted as a condition of approval of the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan
project is applicable to the proposed Planning Area VI project. I
i
Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
4.8.4 SCHOOLS
Previously ADoroved Project
The IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan site is located within the boundaries of the Cucamonga
School Distdct (CSD) and Chaffey Joint Union High School District (CJUHSD). The EIR
'dprEo'i ';te:
attend schools within the CSD and CJUHSD.
Adopted Mitigation Program
· Pdor to occupancy, development impact fees in accordance with CSD and CJUHSD shall
be paid.
Currently Proposed Project
Development of the project site would directly generate new students attending schools within the
Cucamonga School District (CSD) and Chaffey Joint Union High School Distdct (CJUHSD).
Chaffey Joint High School Distdct includes eight high schools with two additional school scheduled
to open in September 2002. CJUHSD has a generation rate of 0.20 high school students per
dwelling unit, a design capacity of 15,485, and a district enrollment of 19,853 students (as of
October 2000) (CJUHSD, October 2000).
The Cucamonga School Distdct (CSD) operates five schools, three serving grades kindergarten
through fifth grade, one serving grades sixth through eighth grade, and one serving kindergarten
only. The CSD capacity is 2,854 students and current enrollment is 2,827 students (as of
November 2000) (CSD). The generation rates for elementary school and middle school are 0. 1673
and 0.0622, respectively (CSD, November 2000).
The proposed Ironwood/Fairway Palms housing developmentwould be required to pay school fees
to mitigate for potential impacts to the school districts. Using the generation factors provided by
the two affected school districts and applying it to the proposed project, based on 496 apartment
units, the Ironwood/Fairway Palms project would generate 228 school-aged children, of which 114
students would be in grades kindergarten through eighth grade, and 99 students would be in high
school. Because the project would be required to pay school fees, no significant impacts are
anticipated.
Mitigation Program
As with the previously approved land uses for Planning Area VI, the proposed project would be
required to pay school fees.
4.9 ENERGY DEMAND AND CONSERVATION
4.9.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
Development of Planning Area VI with office, industrial, and commercial uses would result in a
demand of approximately 5.07 million kilowatt hours per year of electricity. Although the approved
land uses would result in an increase in existing demand for electricity, project demand is within
service projections of Southern California Edison.
R:~ProjeC~S~FF De~Jool ~dendum-03qgO~.w~ 25 Comparative Environmental Analy~s
Ironw~Z/Fairway Palms I
Addendure to a Previously Certified EIR
Development of the project site would demand approximately 99,827.8 therms of natural gas per I
year. While land uses proposed on the site would increase the existing demand for natural gas,
the demand can be met by the Southern California Gas Company.
Adooted Mitigation Pro.qram i
No mitigation measures are required. However, the following measures are proposed to minimize I
overall energy consumption.
· In order to conserve energy, individual developments on the project site shall incorporate '1
energy efficient technologies, practices, and equipment to reduce the onsite demand of
electricity, natural gas and fuel.
· Implementation of the project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Uniform Building I
Code.
4.9.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT I
As shown in Table 8, implementation of the Ironwood/Fairway Palms project would decrease the
annual demand of electricity to 2.79 million kWh and increase the annual demand of natural gas !
to 235,600 therms, when compared to approved land uses for Planning Area VI. The differences
in electdcity and natural gas demands in comparison to the demands of the approved Planning
Area VI, Sub-Area Specific Plan would not significantly affect existing and planned facilities. I
TABLE 8
ENERGY DEMAND
475 thetins/unit/year'. 235,600 therms
Electricity 5,626.5 kWh/unit~/ear~. 2.79 million kWh
kWh: Kilowatt Hours
a. The Gas Company, September 1999. i
b. Appendix 9, SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality, adopted Apdl 1993. Demand factors are based on Southern
California Edison and Los Angeles Department of Public Works average usage rates.
I
The Southern California Edison Company can install electric distribution facilities and provide
electdc service in accordance with its Tadff Schedules which are the effective rules and rates of
the Southem California Edison Company on file with the Public Utilities Commission of the State I
of California.
The Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the project is proposed. I
Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main located in Milliken Avenue. The
service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension plans on file with the
Califomia Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual agreements are made. I
Miti ation Pro ram
No significant impacts have been identified; no mitigation is required. I
I
R:\~,~j,,j~F Dev',JC~l Addendum~O31~4}l.wpd 26 CemparatNe Environmental Analysis I
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendum to a previously Certified EIR
I 4.10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
4.10.1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
i Use of the project site for grape vineyards indicates the potential for herbicide residue in shallow
site soils. Herbicides are not considered to be a public health threat and can be remediated, if
I · necessary, using readily available techniques.
Approved land uses on Planning Area VI could use and/or generate hazardous materials; however,
local, state, and federal regulations/requirements and guidelines provide mechanisms to ensure
proper storage and transport of hazardous materials and trained response to any potential
hazardous matedal incidents.
I AdoDted Mitigation Proc3ram
· Development currently being proposed, constructed, or completed under buildout of the City
I of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan are required to comply with all existing local, state,
and federal regulations/requirements and guidelines that provide for mechanisms to ensure
proper storage and transport of hazardous materials and treatment of any potential
i hazardous matedal incidents. Therefore, no further mitigation measures are required.
4.10.2 CURRENTLY PROPOSED PROJECT
I A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report was prepared for the project site by Gradient
Engineers, Inc. in May 2000. According to the report, Planning Area VI does not contain any
i known hazardous materials facilities onsite. There are two facilities listed within one-quarter mile
of the project site. The first facility is a USGS water well located southeast of the site. The second
listed facility is an underground storage tank (UST), maintained by the State of California Highway
I Patrol and located at 9530 Pittsburgh Avenue. Neither of the identified sites is anticipated to
present an environmental concern to development of Planning Area VI.
Similar to the approved Sub-Area Specific Plan, implementation of the proposed residential
I development would not result in a signfficant impact with regard to hazardous materials.
Residential development would not be expected to generate or use hazardous materials.
I Mitigation Program
No mitigation is required.
I
I
I
i
I
i R:~tOjSCtS~FF Oev',J001 Addendure-031901 .v~d 27 Comparative Environmental Analysis
I Ironwood/Fairway Palms
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
I SECTION 5
CONCLUSIONS
I An Addendum to the IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan final EIR is the appropriate documentation
because some changes or additions are necessary to descdbe the proposed residential project,
but none of the conditions described in the CEQA Guidelines §15162 calling forthe preparation of
I .' a subsequent EIR have occurred. The City of Rancho Cucamonga finds that:
· there have not been substantial changes in the project that require major revisions to the
previous EIR because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
I the sevedty of previously identified significant effects;
· there have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances underwhich the
I project is undertaken, which will require major revisions to the previous EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; or
I · there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the El R was certified
i as complete, that shows any of the following: a) the project will have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, b) significant effects previously
examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR, c) mitigation
measures or altematives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and
would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project
proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or d) mitigation
I measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final
EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I Ironwood/Fairlvay Palms
Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
I SECTION 6
REFERENCES
I FF Development, L.P. (July 2000). Uniform Application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
· Gradient Engineers, Inc. (May 3, 2000).- Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report: 23.2
I Acres North of Fourth Street and West of Milliken Avenue Located in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Prepared for FF Development L.P., San Diego, Califomia.
I LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. (June 22, 2000). Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Palmer
Golf Course Apartments, Paroel 6, Paroel Map No. 14647. Prepared for FF Development,
L.P., San Diego, California.
I Michael Brandman Associates. (Jan. 1994). Draft Specific Plan forthe Rancho Cucamonga IASP
Sub-Area f8 Specific Plan. Prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia.
I Personal Communication. (Oct. 24, 2000). S. Sundell. Chaffey Joint Union High School District.
Personal Communication. (Nov. 9, 2000). J. Morrison. Chaffey Joint Union High School District.
I Personal Communication, T. Selstad, Southern California Edison Company, June 15, 2000.
I RKJK & Associates, Inc. (Aug. 28, 2000, revised Dec. 26, 2000). Empire Lakes Planing Area 6
Apartments Preliminary Noise Study.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
NOISE STUDY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
i
I EMPIRE LAKES-PLANNING AREA VI APARTMENTS
PRELIMINARY NOISE STUDY
Rancho Cucamonga, California
.I
,,,"
nt By: FF DEVELOPMENT; 619 457 1121; Jan-3-01 5:35PM; Page 2
& ASSOCIATES INC.
I December 26, 2000
I
Mr. Dan Mitich
I FF DEVELOPMENT L.P.
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92121
I Subject: Empire Lakes Planning Area 6 Apartments - Additional Noise
Information
I Dear Mr. Milich:
The firm of RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. (RKJK) has ~reviewed Comment 17 (see
I Appendix "A") for the proposed F_mpire Lakes Planning Area 6 Apartments Project (DR
00-67, TPM 15536, ISPA 00-04) from the City of RanchO Cucamonga. I spoke to Mr.
Brent LeConte from the City and he indicated that second and third floor balconies will
I have to have their outdoor areas mitigated, no matter what the size of the balconies.
RKJK has re-run the noise model for apar~rnent units along Fourth Street and have
I concluded that in order to achieve the City of Rancho~ Cucamonga's exterior noise
standard of 60 CNEL. balcony enciosures will be required for those balconies facing
Fourth Street. in order to accommodate this, it recommended that a minimum six (6)
I foot solid wa~l or combination of solid wail and quarter-inch glazing or lexan can be
constructed to achieve the required noise reduction. The noise catculation worksheets
are included in Appendix "B".
I RKJK appreciates this opportunity to provide this additional information to FAIRFIELD
RESIDENTIAL LLC. If you require any additional information or need fun'her review,
i please do not hesitate to give me a call at (949) 474-0809;
Sincerely,
I RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I Robert Kahn, P.E,
Principal
RK:wgl10893
JN:1269-00-03
I Attachments :
TRAN~PORTATIO N PLANNING *
i i
]t~0t i.loveStrcet, 5tjite2<)O · Newtlort I~ee.r-:h,
I
ent By: FF DEVELOPMENT; 619 457 1121; Jan-3-01 5:36PM; Page 6/10
~ !
I
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB ~; 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4TM STREET DATE: 22-Pet-00 I
LOCATION: BLDG 2 - 3RD FLOOR BY= A CADAVONA
ADT = 41,300 PK HR VOL = 4,130
SPEED = 45 I
PK HR % = 10
CTL DIST= 113
DIST N/F=- 76 (M=76,P~52,S=36, C=12) AUTO St2 0rSTANCE = 110.48
DT WJL~L- 113 MED TROCK SLE DIST~ 110.03 I
DT W/OB~ 0 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST- 109,23
HTH WALL= 26.0
OBS HTH= 25,0 I
AMBIENT=
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
OF ANGLE= 180 I
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE}
AUTOMOmrLE$ = 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS ~ 10 GRADE ADJUSTMEMT~ 0.00
HEAVY TRUCKS 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS) I
BARRIER = 0 (0'WALL, I~BERM)
PAD EL ~ 34.5 EL AUTOMOBILES = 34.8
ROAD EL = 3~.B EL MEDIUM TRUCKS- 36.8 I
GRADE " 0.4 % EL HSAVY TRUCKS = 40.8
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 I
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
XXDAVY T~UCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
~ I
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR B~RRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIG6T LEQ CNEL I
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 70.0 68.1 66.4 60.3 69.5
M~DIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.1 59.6 53°2 51.7 60.4
H~VY TRUCKS LEO 61.7 60.3 51~2 52.5 81.0 I
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.1 69.3 68'.7 61.5 70.5
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TO~O AND BAPaIER SHIELDING I
PK BR LE~ DAY LEQ EVEN ~EQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.5 58.7 56.1 50.9 60.0 I
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR ~ARRIER = 71.1 71.1 I
MIT PK MR LEQ WIT~ TOPO AND BARRIER = 60j.5 ******* 60.5
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 70.5 70.5
MIT CNE~ WITH TOPO AN0 BARRIER m 60.0 ******* 60.0
!
!
FF DEVELOPMENT; 619 457 1121; Jan-3-01 5:36PM; Page 7/10
:
Ir'R~-I~,D-~-~09 ~ZGII~esY NOZSE PP, IDXCTXO~ ~ (~O)
P~JEC~: G~NE~ D~ICS A~AR~MENTS .JOB ~: 1269-00-03
DA~R: 22-DeC-00
ROA~AY: 4T~ STK~ET · 5y: A ~AVONA
L~TION: BL~ ~ - 2~ FLW~ '
. · ~PK MB VOL · 4,130
· A~ = 4~,300
CTL DIST= 110 :
DIgT N/P~ 76 (M=76,P~52,s'36'C=~2) A~O SLE;DIST~NCE ~ 106.32
DT ~L- 1~0 MED TRDCK SLE DIST~ !05.99
~ W/OB' 0 MVY TRUCK SLE OISTz 105.45
OBS MTH= 15.0
~BiENT=
KOA~Y VI~: LF ~GL~ -90
RT ~GL~* 90
DF ANGLE= 180
STTE CONDITIONS (~0=HARD SITE, 15=sO~ SITE)
AUT~TLES = 10
~DI~ TRUCKS - 10 G~DE A~STM~NT= 0.0O
HEAVY TRUCKS - 10 (~jUS~NT TO H~VY TRUCKS}
B~IER = 0 (0-W~L,I=BE~) ~L AUTOSBILlS = 32.3
PAD EL ~ 34.0 ~L~DI~ TRUCKS= 34.3
ROAD EL ~ 30.3 ~L M~VY T~UCKS = 38.3
G~D8 ~ 0.4 %
~ICL~ TYPE DAY EVENING MIGHT DAILY
0.775 0.129 0.096
AUT~OBILES 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
MDZ~M TRUCKS 0,865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
HEAVY TRUCKS
NOISZ IMPACTS WITHOUT TO90 OR BARRIER
~K ~R LEQ DAY L~Q ~N ~ NIGHT ~Q ~EL
AUT~BILE~ LEQ 70.2 68.3 66.5 '60.5
~DI~TRUC~ LEQ 61.3 59.8 53.4 51.8 65.5
M~VY TRUCKS LEQ 61.8 60.4 5~.]4 52.6 61.1
vEBICULA~ NOIS~ 71.3 69.5 66.9 61.6
NO=SE IMPACTS WIT~ TOPO AND B~IER SHIELDING
PK MR LEQ DAY ~Q ~N L~Q NIGHT 5~Q CNZL
VEH!C~ NOISE 59.6 5~.8 55~2 49.9 58.0
W/O MZENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR L~ WITHOUT TOPO OR B~I~R = 71~3 71.3
MT~ PK ~R LEQ WIT~ TOPO ~D BA~I~R = 59;6
CNEL WTTBO~ TOFO ~D ~IIR ~Q;7 70.7
59:.0 ~..***** 59.0
HIT C~EL WITH TOPO ~D BARRIE~
F ent By: FF DEVELOPMENT; 619 457 1121; Jan-a-01 5:aHPM; Page 8/10
P~OJECT: GENE~ DYN~ZCS AP~TMBNT$ '. JOB ~ .... 1269-00-03
ROA~AY: 4TH STREET · DATE: ZZ-Oec-00
L~TION: BL~ 4 - 2~D FL~R BY: A CA~VO~
· ADT = 41,300 PK ~R VOL · 4,130
SPEED = 45
PK MR % =
CTL DIST~ 110
DIST N/~ ~6 {H~76,P~52, S=36,C~12) AUTO SLE DIST~CE - 105.73
DT W~L= llC NED TRUCK SLE DIMT~ 105.41
~ W/OB= 0 HVY T~U~ SLE
HTH WALL= 16.0
OBS MTM= 15.0
MIENT= 0.O
R~DWAY VIEW: L[ ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
SITE C~DTTIONS (10=HRRD StT~, 15mSO~ SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MEDI~ TRU~ = ~0 G~DE A~OSTMENT~ 0.00
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (AD~STMNT TO HEAVY TRUC~)
B~IER = 0 (0~W~L,i=BE~ :
PAD BL - 34.0 EL AUT~5ILES 32.3
R~D EL = 30.3 EL M~DI~ TRUC~= 34.3
G~ 0.4 % ~ M~VY T~UCKS
VE~ICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
A~TOMOBILES 0,775 0.129 0.096 0.9~42
M~DI~ TRUCKS 0,848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
M~VY T~UCKS 0.865 0.0t7 0.108 0.0074
~:OtSE IMPACTS WXTM~T TOPO OR ~IE~ S~IELDING
%'K ~R L~Q DAY LEQ ~VEN L~ NIGHT LEQ ~L
AUT~OBILES LEQ 70.2 68.3 66.:6 60.5 69.7
~DI~ T~UC~ LEQ 61.3 59.8 53.'4 51.9 60.6
~VY T~0C~S LEQ 61.9 60.4 51.:4 52.7 61.1
~MICU~ NOISE 7]. 3 59.5 66 .:9 61.6 70.7
..
NOZSE IMPACTS WI~M TOPO AND BARRIER
'eK ~R LEQ DAY L~ EVeN LEQ NIGHT L~Q CNEL
VEHICU~R MOlSE 60.8 59.0 56~
W/O MIENT W/~IENT
~K MR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER 71.3 71,3
MIT PK MR ~Q WITH T(}~D ~IER = 60:8
C~L WITMO~ TOPO ~[3 B~RIER -- 70.7 7~.7
NIT CNEL W~TE TOPO ~D ~RI~R ~ 60.3
nt By: FF DEVELOPMENT; 619 457 1121; Jan-3-01 S:STPM; Page 9/10
~ald~.-t~D-77-Z08 H~'~i%.Y NOISE PREDICfZO~ ii~ (CaXa'V'INO)
I
PROJECT: GENEPJ~.T~ DYNAMICS A?SLRTMSNTS JO~ ~; ~269-00-0~
I ~OAE:~TA~ ~H S~K~ DA~S= 22-Dec-00
. BY: A CADAVONA
LOCATION: BLDG 2 - 2NO ~%OOR
I SPEED ~ 45
PK HR % ~ 10
CTL DIET= 113
DIET N/F= 76 (M~76,P=5~,S=36,C~121 AUTO S~E DISTANCE - 109.14
I DT WALL- 113 MED TRUGK SLE DIST~ 108,86
DT W/DE= 0 MVY TRUCK SLE DI~T~ 108.41
MTH WAD~= 16.5
I DES HTH= 15.0
AMBIENT~ 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
I D~ ANGLE= 1S0
SITE CONDITIONS (10cHARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS - 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
I HEAVY TRUCKS ' t0 {ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER = O (0=WALL, I=BERM)
PAO EL 34.5 EL AUTOMOEILES = 34.8
ROAD EL = 32.8 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 36.8
I GRADE - 0.4 % EL HEAVY TRUCKS -- 40.8
VEKICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
I AUTOMORTLES' 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.974~
MEDIUM T~UCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
[~EAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0,027 0.I08 0.0074
!
NOISE IMPACTS WiThOUT TOPQ OR BARRIER SHIELDING
I ~K MR LEQ DAY LE~ EVeN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ ~0.1 68.2 66.:4 60.4 69.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.1 59.~ 53.3 51.7 60.4
I ~EAVY TRUCKS LEQ 61.7 60.3 51.3 52.5 61.0
~ --
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.1 69.3 66.8 61,5 70.6
I NO~SE IMPACTS WITH TO~O AND BARRIER S~IELDING
PK MR DEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ CMEL
I VEHICULAR NOISE 59.6 57.8 55;2 49.9
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR B~a~RIER e 71~1 71.~
I MIT PK MR LEQ WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 59~6 ******* 59.6
CN~L WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 70~6
MIT CNEL WITH TO~O AND BARRIER ~ 59~0 ****~* 59.0
!
!
!
ent By: FF DEVELOPMENT; 619 457 1121; Jan-3-01 5:37PM; Page 10/10
:
~,'ira-~,o-~-z08 KIGM'4~ tioga1 ~'R~DZCTZON ]M0OiZ, (CALVINO)
.
PROJECT: GENE~ D~ICS AP~TH~NTS . JOB ~: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4T~ STREET ' ~TE; ~2-Dec-0O
LOCATION: BLOC 2 - 2N~ FLOOR BY; A
ADT = 41,306 PK ~RVO~ = 4,130
SPEED = 45
PK ~R % =
CTL DIST~ 113
DIST N/F= ~6 {M=?6, P=52,S=36,C=~2) AUTO S~: DISTANCE ~ 108.57
DT WALL= 113 M~ TRUCK SLB DIST~ 108.30
DT W/OH= 0 HVY TRUCK S~E DIST~ t0~.86
HT~ W~L- 16.0
OBS MTM= 15.0
MIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ~GL~-
RT ANGLE= 90
D[ ~GLE= 180
SITE CONOITTONS (10=HARD SITE, 15mSOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MDI~ T~UCKS = 10 G~DE ADJDSTMENTm
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (A~ST~NT ~O HEAVY TRUC~)
B~I=~ = O (0~WALL, I=BE~} :
PAD EL 34.b EL AUTO~SILES = 34,8
ROAD EL = 32.8 EL HEDI~ TRUCKS= 36.8
G~DS = 0.4 % ~L ~VY TRUCKS = 40.8
VEHICLE TYPE DAY ~ENI~ N~GMT DAILY
A~TO~B~LES 0.~75 0.129 0.096
MEDI~ TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
H~VY T~UCKS 0.865 0,027 C. 108 0.00~4
%QISE IMPACTS WITMO~ TOPO OR B~RIER SHIELDING
PK MR LEQ OAY LEO EVEN L~ NIGHT LEO CNEL
A~SILES L~Q 70.1 68.2 66.:5 60.4 69.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS LSQ 61.2 59.7 53.]3 51.8
HEAVY TRUCKS LEO 61.~ 60.3 51.3 52.5 61.0
VEHICU~R NOISE ~1.2 69.4 66-28 61.5 70.5
~ISE IMPACT~ WITH TOm~D B~IER SHIELDING
eK MR L~Q DAY LEO EVSN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
VEHICU~ NOISE 60.8 59.0 56;4 51.1 60_2
W/O ~BIENT W/
~K HR LBQ WITHOUT TOPO O~ B~IER -- 71~2 71.2
NIT PK HR~Q WITH TOPO~D B~IER ~ 60~8 ***'*~* 60.8
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND B~IER = 70;6 70.6
NIT C~L WITH TOP0 ~D ~RIER 60.2 ******* 60.2
San Diego, CA 92121 .
Subject: Empire Lakes - Planning Area 6 Apartments Preliminary Noise Study
Dear Ms. Lehotsky:
noise study for .
oho~4th Street
objective
iated With
Apartments. Based
if the recommended
and look fo~ard to working with you in the
. is eas7 d0 not hesitate to call at
880 IATE8, INC. -X:P. ~i' O
~ Robe~ Kahn, P.E.
Bill Lawson, AICP
Senior Planner Principal
BL:RK:s~/11190
J N:1269-00-02
A~achments
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING · GIS · TRAFFIC/ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING
]601 Dove Street, Suite 290 · Newport Beach, CA 92660 · Phone: (949~ 474-0809 · Fax: (949) 474-0902
U~ES-PU~.~,.~ AR~ 6 APARTMENTS'
PRELIMINARY NOISE STUDY
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
FF DEVELOPMENT, L.P.
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92121 ~.. ::
Prepared by: .¥ '~ .:..
RKJK &ASSOCIATES, INC. '::~
1601 Dove Street, Suite 290
Newpo~ Beach, CA 92660
: :':.~.
Bill Lawson, AICP .
Robe~ Kahn, P.E.
July 6, 2000
August 28, 2000 (Revised)
JN:1269-00-03
RK:BL:s~/11190
TABLE OF CONTENTS
! · ~ PAGE
I-~ SECTION ' '~
1
'1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................1
On-Site Noise Exposure Analysis and Control ..........................................................4
Off-Site Noise Exposure Analysis and Control ..........................................................
i~ SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................7"5
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................8
Project Location .........................................................................................................8
Project Description .......2 ................................;--. .........................................................8
NOISE STANDARDS ....................................................., ..............................................10
Noise Rating Scales ..................................................................................................
, 13
NOISE MONITORING ..................................................................................................13
Measurement Procedure and Criteria .......................................................................
~ Measurement Results ...............................................................................................15
Project On-Site Generated Noise Impa~ Analysis ...................................................18
!I o~-s,~ .o,s~ ~os~ ~s,s ~.~ co.~o~ ........................................2~
Roadway Noise Impacts ...........................................................................................21
E~erior Area Noise Exposure Analysis and Control ................................................23
Intedor Area Noise Exposure Analysis and Control ..................................................26
ii o~-~,~ .o,~ ~o~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~o.~o~ ......................................~0
Sho~-Term Construction Noise ................................................................................30
' 31
Tra~c Noise Contours ..............................................................................................
q 36
CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................
~ GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS ........................................................................A
CITY OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS ............................................B
~- NOISE PROJECTION WORKSHEETS .........................................................................C
i~ ~ ~o.~ ~,~o~ ..................................................................................
E
CNEL NOISE CONTOUR PROJECTIONS ...................................................................
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT.~.- PAGE
A LOCATION MAP .............................................................................................2
B SITE PLAN ......................................................................................................3
o ~..~,,o~oo~.~-,o,~ .........................................................~
D NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS .............................................................14
E ONTAR,O A,RPORT NO~SE CONTOUR BOUNDAR, ES .............................
LIST oF TABLES
PAGE
1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE
· ORDINANCE STANDARDS ..........................................................................11
2 EXISTING (AMBIENT) NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ..........................16
3 REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS .....................................:..17
4 EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL PROJECTIONS AT
OBSERVER LOCATION # 1 ..........................................................................19
5 EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL PROJECTIONS AT
OBSERVER LOCATION # 2 ..........................................................................20
6 ROADWAY AND SITE PARAMETERS ........................................................24
7 FUTURE EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA CNEL) ....................................25
8 FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) ....................... 27
9 SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) ................... 28
10 THIRD FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL ..........................29
11 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1000'S)~ ........................................................32
12 EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS .................................................................33
13 FUTURE YEAR 2010 NOISE CONTOURS ................................................34
14 FUTURE YEAR NOISE LEVEL INCREASES ............................................35
PLANNING AREA 6 APARTMENTS
EMPIRE LAKES-
PRELIMINARY NOISE STUDY '~'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A preliminary noise study has been completed to determine the extedor/interior noise ·
exposure and the necessary noise mitigation measures for the Empire Lakes - Planning
Area 6 Apartments located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed site is
located north of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue and east of Haven as shown on
Exhibit A. The results of this analysis indicate that future motor vehicle noise from 4th
Street is the principal source of community noise that will impact the project. However,
these noise impacts can be adequately mitigated with the appropriate noise control
measures recommended in this report.
The proposed project consists of 528 multi-family apartment units contained on 3 levels in
a total of 23 buildings. The plan used for this analysis is shown on Exhibit B. The project
was previously reviewed as part of a sub-area Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report prepared in 1994, The EIR project mitigation essentially outlined the City of
Rancho Cucamonga exterior and interior noise standards for the proposed project.
On-Site Noise Exposure Analysis and Control
The results of this study indicate that the projected exterior noise levels for a worst-case
situation, exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga exterior noise standard of 60 dBA
CNEL for residential uses. To reduce the projected exterior noise levels, a 6.0-foot high
sound barrier will be required for the 1 st floor patio areas on buildings 24 facing 4th
Street. This can be accomplished using a continuous sound barder or through the use of
individual patio enclosures. The interior noise exposure standard of 45 dBA CNEL will
1
EXHII~IT A i
LOCATION MAP'
STH ST. ~!i
4TH ST, i;.,,.i .~?.
;.::....:
I
ONTARIO MILLS PK~/Y.
INLAND ' ' :
I
:1'
I
I
'1
be met using a "windows closed" condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation" I
(i.e. air conditioning) and upgraded windows with a minimum Sound Transmission Class
~'TC) rating of 29 for buildings facing 4th Street. '~ :.1
Off-Site Noise Exposure Analysis and Control ; I
· '1
The City of Rancho Cucamonga noise ordinance outlines no~se requirements for the ::;:.
proposed Commercial Center located east of the Empire Lakes - Planning Area 6:. :,'i.';.i. :,
Apartments. The pdmary noise source impacts associated with the planned commercial
site for have been analyzed in this report. Any additional noise sources or "nuisance"
b'pe noise produced by the development must also comply with the stationary source
i-;= noise criteria. No additional noise mitigation is required for the Empire Lakes - Planning
Area ~ Apa~ment proiect to meet the City of Rancho Cuoamonga No,se Ord,nance
of the day. These on-site generated noise impacts would be controlled by the stationaN
source noise criteria. The standards are designed to protect residential neighbo~oods
from noise impacts for both the da~ime hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM and nightline ':1
presented in the "Summa~ of Recommendations" of this repo~.
I
I
I
I
4
I
Exhibit C shows the Iocatior~<~f the building locations, including the recommended noise
mitigation measures. The following recommendations are consistent with the noise
mitigation measures found in the sub-area Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report
prepared in 1994.
1. Construct a 6.0-foot high sound barrier for all the first floor exterior patio areas in :~':=:"
buildings facing 4th Street. This can be accomplished using a continuous sound
barder or through' the use of individual patio enclosures. The designed noise
screening may only be accomplished if the barriers weight is at least 3.5 pounds i.
per square foot of face area and with no decorative cutouts or line-of-site
openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The recommended noise
control barrier may be constructed using one of the following alternative
materials:.
ao Masonry block;
b. Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or 1 inch thick
tongue and groove wood of sufficient weight per square foot;
::: ,.
c. Glass (1/4 inch thick), or other transparent material-with sufficient
~ .-;-::
weight per square foot; "' :"'
d. Earthen berm;
e. Any combination of these construction materials
The patio enclosure must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary
openings or decorative cutouts should not be made. All gaps (except for weep
holes) should be filled grout or caulking.
2. The interior noise exposure standards for the project will be met using the standard
building shell construction and a "windows closed" condition for buildings facing 4th
5
~: EXHIBIT C
:'] ' ' SUMMARY 0 RECOMMENDATIONS
~ : ~ .. ,,~ .
PROVIDE UPGRADED WINDOWS ; ~
WITH A MINIMUM SOUND "'
',~sMl~loN cuss ,~'.NG
(STC) OF 29 FOR ALL WINDOWS
IN BUILDINGS FACING 4TH ST. ,-"
..~,,,~ ,.,,.= ",, ,._ ~
~.~:.-
PROVIDE A "WINDOWS CLOSED"
"° .... \ CONDITION REQUIRING A MEANS
~.!j/' ,,, i OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION
<, __ PER UBC REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
<" "'~ / UNITS IN BUILDINGS FACING 4TH ST.
:~: ", _
FOURTH ~'
"'::"""""""":~
CONSTRUCT A 6.0-FOOT HIGH
SOUND BARRIER FOR THE 1ST
FLOOR PATIO AREAS FOR
BUILDINGS FACING 4TH ST.
" RKJK
6
Street requidng a means of mechanical ventilation per UBC requirements. This
mechanical ventilation system shall supply two air changes per hour for eaclp
h~'bitable room, with a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per
occupant. The fresh air inlet duct shall be of sound attenuating construction and : .
i Shall consist of a minimum often feet of straight or curved duct or six feet plus one . ...'::,~.".
I sharp 90° bend.
,::.....
Provide upgraded windows with a minimum STC (sound transmission class) rating
of 29 for all windows in buildings facing 4th Street. For proper acoustical
=-~ ....performance, all exterior windows, doom and sliding glass doors must have a
:. positive seal, and leaks and cracks must be kept down to a minimum.
During construction, the project shall comply with recommendations found in the
sub-area Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report that includes the following
.- a. Construction activity shall be limited to 6:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday
· through Saturday, unless a permit for each work area has been issued by
i the Director of Public Works, or no noise-sensitive receptors would be ::. ....
I, exposed to the construction noise.
manufacturers recommended specifications for operation and
maintenanoe's.
I c. Development of the project site shall be inconformance with the ,
Performance Standards identified in the proposed Sub-Area Specific '
I Plan.
5. Operations at the commercial center site must comply with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Noise Standards.
I
i 7
I
INTRODUCTION
I
Lakes - Planning Area 6 Apartments project to be located the City of Rancho ,;.:::!;::.";
i':;
CucamOnga, California. Included in this report is a discussion of expected community
noise environment with the development of the proposed Empire Lakes - Planning Area .....
_ ,.
J.~ The project site is located north of 4~' Street, west of Milliken Avenue and east of Haven
!:~i.[a the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Exhibit A illustrates the study area. The proposed
~;~ project site is currently vacant.
Pr_EgLect Des~
i.=~, r"
The proposed project consists of 528 multi-family apartment units contained on 3 levels in
a total of 23 buildings. Access to the site will be provided from Fourth Street and Fifth
Street. : .......
Customer parking will occur primadly in the center of the commercial site east of the "'!1
Empire Lakes - Planning Area 6 Apartments building. Truck delivery noise will be
generated in the loading areas shown on the site plan. Noise generated from truck
deliveries includes the trucks themselves, noise generated from backup buzzers/bells,
refdgeration units and the movement of goods along metal rollers at the loading dock. I
In the following sections, noise exposures expected within .the planned site are reviewed i'
and compared to the applicable noise control criteria. Design recommendations
necessary to comply with the noise control criteria are presented in the "Summary of !.
8 I
I:
Recommendations" section 0f this report. A glossary ~f acoustical terms is included in
Appendix "A".
i" '
9
NOISE STANDARDS I
The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses the CNEL scale for land use/noise compatibility
assessment. For residential land uses the City requires the interior noise standard not to
exceed 45 dBA CNEL and the exterior noise standard in outdoor living areas not to i
exceed 60 dBA CNEL. The CNEL noise standards are used to assess the noise impacts ~:~' i
associated with the vehicle noise from 4th Street. :: ,::
~e City of Rancho Cucamonga'noise ordinance standards are designed to protect
~--residential neighborhoods from stationa~ source noise impacts associated with the
}~eighbo~ng commercial center for both the da~ime hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM and ~'
~the compatibili~ of residential land uses with respect to stationa~ noise sources. The
~- - : ::: :~;::a~:~:;
A number of noise rating scales are used in Califomia for land use compatibili~ ::
assessment. These scales are: the Equivalent Noise Level (LEQ), the Day Night Noise
Level (LDN), and the Communi~ Noise Equivalent Noise Level (CNEL). -These scales
are described in the following paragraphs:
· A-weighted decibels (dBA) are the most common units used for measuring the
loudness of a noise event. The human ear has different sensitivity to different
frequencies of sound (noise). A-weighting is an a~empt to give the noise monitor
the same frequency sensitiviW as the human ear. Technically, it is the
measurement of the energy being received when listening to (or monitoring) a
source of noise. For example, the loudness of a highway may be 65 dBA when
measured 50 feet away. The sound decreases as one moves away from the
source, and the same highway would have a noise level of 62 dBA at 100 feet.
10
:~::
J
CITY OF RANC'HO CUCAI~NGA NOISE ORDINANCE STANDARDS
NOT-TO-EXCEED EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA Leq)
MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE
7:00 AM TO 10:00 PM 10:00 PM TO 7:00 AM DURATION / HOUR SYMBOL
75 70 0 Minutes L,.~,
· ~;! 74 69 5 Minutes La
65 60 10 Minutes L17
60 55 15 Minutes L2s
ii
c:~kktables~k 11100%%kkl 1190tb
; JN:1260-00-03 11
I
The relationship betwsen how one perceives a sound anc~the actual ~ound energy/
emitted by the source of noise is very complex. However~a good rule of thumb is
that if a noise increases 10 dBA, its apparent loudness will double.~Therefore, a
· noise that is 70 dBA will appear twice as loud as a 60 dBA noise.
· The LEQ scale represents the energy average noise level over a sample period of
time. It represents the decibel sound level that would contain the same amount of
energy as a fluctuating sound level over the sample time period.
:' · The LDN scale represents a time weighted 24 hour average noise level based on
!-. the A-weighted decibel. Time weighted refers to the fact that noise occurs during
i .- certain sensitive time periods is penalized for occurring at these times. For the
~.:
· LDN scale the nighttime period (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) noises are penalized by 10
dBA.
· The CNEL scale is Similar to the LDN scale except that it includes an additional 5
dBA penalty for the evening time period (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.).
i
i NOISE MONITORING
! MeasurementSProcedure and Criteria
I To determine the existing noise level environment and to assess potential noise impacts
on the adjacent residential areas, noise measurements were taken at three (3) locations.
I Noise monitoring locations were selected based on their respective impact potential. Site
1 was located adjacent to the proposed Clubhouse/Leasing Building. Site 2 was located
t near the 2nd emergency entry to site 2. The third location, Site 3, was taken
approximately 25 feet from the curb of Milliken Avenue. Exhibit D illustrates the noise
;nonitodng locations. Ambient noise measurements were taken on June 27, 2000 dudng
-!--~e daytime hours of 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM.
Noise measurements were taken using a LARSON-DAVIS Model 700 precision
integrating sound level meter, programmed, in "slow" mode, to record noise levels in "A"
weighted form. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after the monitoring with
an I_ARSON-DAVIS calibrator, Model CA 250. The sound level meter and microphone
l were mounted on a tripod, five feet above the ground and equipped with a windscreen
during all measurements. The above instrument automatically calculates the "percent
l noise levels" (Ln) for any specific time period.
i The percent noise level "Ln" is useful to evaluate intermittent noise sources. The percent
noise level is the level exceeded "n" percent of the time during the measurement period.
i L90 is the noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time measured, commonly used to
' estimate the "ambient" noise level. Ls0 is the noise level exceeded 50 percent of the time
measured and can be seen as the "average" noise level. L~0 is the noise level exceeded
10 percent of the time measured, and represents the peak or intrusive noise level.
i 13
i
~ ~ - '- EXHIBIT D
, : NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS
i
:'..
I
,, ,, ,1 !
' -.
...... ,, ,'// ;'
,-- ,._, ~:~
-'!
I
LEGEND:
'i.
14 i
Measurement ResUlts
The results 'of the noise level measurements are presented in Ta 1~'2. Each site was
b
monitored for a minimum time period of 10 minutes. Based on the noise measurement
results presented in Table 2, the project site currently experiences ambient noise levels
ranging from Leq = 49.4 dBA at Site 1 to Leq = 51.4 dBA at Site 2. A noise level 62.0
dBA Leq was measured at Site 3 on the proposed commercial center site. Noise levels at : ,.:
these locations were influenced primarily from the adjoining roadways.
In order to evaluate future on-site stationary noise impacts, noise measurements were
'
taken at facilities containing similar wholesale/retail uses as those proposed at the
commercial center. Truck delivery noise was estimated based on measurements taken :/!"
on August 28, 1999 at the Hemet Walgreens store. The measurements include loading · :.::
and unloading of truck trailers, truck drive-by noise, truck engine noise, and the
movement of goods on metal rollers. Without any mitigation, the loading dock noise will
have an estimated Leq of 66.3 dBA at a distance of 6 feet from the loading dock. While
other smaller local vendor trucks will contribute to the noise environment, the reference ..
tractor-trailer truck noise measurements represents the '%vorst-case" noise impact.
To evaluate on-site automobile generated noise impacts, additional field measurements
were taken at the Newport Beach Wells Fargo Bank ATM drive-thru by RKJK and F":,:~r:.
i Associates on June 3, 1999. Table 3 outlines the reference noise level measurements
used for this analysis
I Based upon the reference noise levels provided on Table 3 and the ambient noise level
I measurements shown on Table 2, it is possible to project noise levels from the
commercial center. Noise level projection calculations are included in Appendix "C".
i ! j ·
~ ~:,
I TABLE 2 I
EX,~TING (AMBIENT) NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA Leq)
1 Adjacent to the proposed 51.4 58,5 53.5 52,5 52.0
~i Clubhouse/Leasing building
i !, 2 Near the 2nd emergency entry to site 2. 49.4 56.5 51.7 50,7 50.0
7~.-
Approximately 25 feat the curb of Mitliken
I~,:,, 3 62.0 71.5 66.0 64,0 63.0
,--_ - . . AveRue
~-.
i.-I
!
I
As measured by RKJK & Associates, lnI:. on 6/27/00 during the daytime hours of 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm.
'See Exhibit D for the location of the monitoring sites.
c:\kktables~kl 1100\~kkl 1190tb
JN:1260-00-03
' TABLE 3
REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL ME .~UREMENTS .... :..,
EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
DISTANCE : : :'
FROM
DURATION SOURCE i. :'
SOURCE (MINUTES) (FEET) Leq Lmx LB L17 L2s
~utos-Engine Noise2 10 6 63.8 79.5 65.5 - 64.5
· rash Compactor~ 3 3 72.2 85.5 77.0 - 67.5
I
!
~ As measured by RKJK & Associates. Inc. on 8/28199
'2 As measured by RKJK & Associates, Inc. on 6/3/99.
,
k~bles~kl 1100~kl 1190tb
J~:1260-00-03 ': "'
17
Proi~ct On-Site Generated NoiSe Impact Analysis ,
I
i
Tables 4 and 5 provide ,~ surnmary of the daytime (7:00AM to 10:00PM) exterior, boise .. .~2
level impacts associated with the development of the commercial center. It should be ~ .:
noted t'l~e results presented in Tables 4 and 5 reflect a worst-case situation where all 't
activities occur at once. The development of the proposed commercial is estimated to ! '.~.~ ·
;:.location 1 to 0.6 dBA Leq at observer location 2. In community noise assessment
~:c~anges in noise level greater than 3 dBA are often identified as significant, while
~.~ changes less than 1 dBA will not be discernible to the human ear.
~;~The pdmary noise source impa~s planned for the p~posed Commercial Center have
~en anal~ed in this repo~. Any additional noise sources or "nuisance" ~pe noise
';shown on Teble ~. These s~en~sr~s ere ~esigne~ ~o pro~ec~ resi~en~isl neigbbo~oo~s
~om noise impec[s from bo[b ~be ~e~ime hours of Z:O0 A~ ~o ~0:00 P~ en~ nigb~ime
'i
!
i
!
I
,e
!
ITABLE 4
'~EXTERIOF~
OISE LEVEL PROJECTIONS AT
OBSERVER LOCATION #1 ", '..
I DISTANCE TO
; SOURCE FACADE (IN FEETTM, Leq Lmax Ls L17 L25 ~;: ;.:.:"
.~--.~y'Trucks 1,120 ' 32.2 49.9 33.9 - 27.4
~ Compactor 1,120 15.8 29.1 20.6 - 11.1
~ned Pro3ect & ~b e '
i
I
i .-
I
I
~les~k 11: 00%~kl 1190~
~-~0-0~03 19
TABLE 5 I
.:
EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL Pf~OJECTIO~S AT
OBSERVER LOCATION #2
SOURCE FACADE (IN FEET Leq Lr, ax L8
EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL IMPACT,c; ~ '
)elive~ Trucks ~0 35.9 53.6 37.6 31.1
~utos-Engine Noise 120 39.3 55.0 41.0 - 40.0
', ~.7 ~..~:
.:
i
I
:~k~bles~kl 1100X~kl 1190~
-N:1260~0-03 2 0
I. ON-SITE NOIBE EXPOSURE ANA/¥~I~ AND ~ONTROL
l~'ft is expected that the pdmary sources of noise impacts to the site will be traffic noise from~' 4th Street, Two buildings were selected for future noise impact analysis based on their
I
proximity to 4th Streets. Other local roads are not expected to contribute substantially to
the noise impacts for this project due to their lower volume/speed and shielding by
i building structures between the site and these streets. The proposed Empire Lakes -
P anning Area 6 Apartme,ts residenUa project is ocated we. outside the Ontario Airport
In0ise contour boundaries. The City of Ontario General Plan identifies the Airport
~ bOUndaries which are shown on Exhibit E. Due to the distance and shielding from other
_= ctures, it is expected that the Ontario Airport will not make a significant contribution to
L: ~-~,.. .
i~e no~se environment
:~ Roadway Noise Impacts
'1 It is expected the primary sources of off-site noise impacts to land uses in the vicini
ty of
the site will be caused by project generated traffic. The expected roadway noise impacts
i from vehicular traffic were projected using a computer program which replicates the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model- FHWA-RD-77-
i. 108 (the "FHWA Model"), as modified for CNEL and "Calveno" energy curves. The key
input parameters include; the roadway classification (e.g., collector, secondary, major and
i prime arterial); the roadway active width (i.e., the distance between the center of the
outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway); the total average daily traffic (ADT),
I the travel speed; the percentages of automobiles; medium trucks and heavy trucks in the
traffic volume; the roadway grade; the angle of view (e.g., whether the roadway view is
i blocked); the site conditions ("hard" or "soft" relates to the absorption of the ground,
pavement or landscaping), and the percentage of total average daily traffic (ADT) which
I fiows each hour throughout a 24-hour period.
I
I 21
I
' ~EXHIBIT E · '1.
i !ONTARIO AIRPORT NOISE CONTOUR BOUNDARIES
F'ighlh St. ' ""
"-'%... \ =~ ~ SITE , .,-,,, ..,,,,, ,,,.,, ,,.,
. ,,,,,.,,.~,. ~ ~~ "
__ _ .. ~~I uunh St
' = - I)LRNARUIND ~
:.
~,,,,,,.., .- .......... .., ~~ ....~~,,.,.,.,,,..<
I give~side Dr. ~ '~ ~ ·
- ~ ".~ '~ ~
.... ~.,~T,,~:;:.,~;;:,;;'7::;,~T ........' ......L.~L~' ~'-, ......~
- ~.,,,~...,:,,...,..-=
Schaefer Ave..~_.
.I
I
SOURCE: CI~ OF ONT~IO G~E~ P~
I The traffic volumes 'and travel speeds used for this study are presented in Table 6. The
traffic volumes shown in Table 6 were obtained from the General Dynamics Rancho
I'Cucamonga Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 1~, 1994, prepared by LSA & "':'
ASSOCIATES. These traffic volumes are conservatively high, because the proposed
I project will generate less daily traffic than the previously approved sub-area specific plan. ·
The average travel speeds shown in Table 6 are expected to occur during smooth traffic
I flows on subject roadways. It should be noted that these speeds are used for comparison
calculations and consequently their chanqe in value is more relevant than their absolute '
I~ value. For the purpose of this study, all calculations were made with the speed values
i shown in Table 6.
i;' Exterior Area Noise Exposure Analysis and Control
' noise exposures in all usable outdoor areas not exceed 60 dBA CNEL for residential
uses. Analysis and recommendations for control of motor vehicle noise impacts in
outdoor living areas are presented in this section. · :.z:.
I
Using 'the FHWA tra~c noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Table 6,
i. calculations of the potential worse ~se tra~c noise impacts were completed. The
computer printouts for the specific site impads are included in Appendix "D".
To meet the Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga e~erior noise standard of 60 dBA CNEL for
I residential uses, a 6.0 foot high noise barrier is required for required for the 1st floor patio "
areas on buildings facing 4th Street. Table 7 presents a summa~ of the future e~erior
.i noise levels.
Detailed recommendations for construction and placement of the noise control barrier are -:
~- presented in the Summa~ of Recommendations. Once the recommended bailers are
I
I 23
I
TABLE 8 i
-,t I~'.OADWAY AND SITE PARAMETERS ~;' ':~1
.S~reet 6 or Arterial 41,300 45 SoffJHard .. .,~
: ARTI-'RIAL TRAFFIC FLOW DISTRIBUTION '~:' '''~''::
~mobiles 77.5 12.9 9.6 97.42
~urn Trucks 84.8 4.9 10.3 3.46
~ Trucks 86.5 2.7 10.8 8.64
I-15 Freeway2
~mobiles 77.5 12.9 9.6 81.90
-;ium Trucks 84.8 4.9 10.3 8.40 ': '!'
' ';'
~ Trucks 86.5 2.7 10.8 9.70 ~i~
I
.ture Year 2010 traffic volumes were obtained from the General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Impact Analysis
~ed January 12, 1994. i
:L~Ce: Caltrans 1997 Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic. '
:~kktabres~kkl 1100~kkl 119Orb I
24 I
TABLE 7
FUTURE E:~h'ERIOR NOISE LEVEES (dBA CNEL)
UNMITIGATED EXTERIOR MITIGATED EXTERIOR
NOISE LEVEL (dBA CNEL) NOISE LEVEL (dBA CNEL)
FLOOR FLOOR
MINIMUM REQUIRED
BARRIER HEIGHT
BUILDING 1ST 2ND 3RD 1ST 2ND~ 3RD~ (IN FEET)
2 67.8 70.7 70.6 57.6 70.7 70.6 6.0
4 68.7 71.2 71.1 58,4 71.2 71.1 6.0 .'
-:
~ The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not require exterior noise mitigation for 2nd and 3rd floor balconies
c:%kktables\kkl 1100\~kkl 1190tb
JN:1260-00-03 25
constructed, it is expected that the usable outdoor residential space noise-exposure I
levels will be less than the 60 dBA CNEL.
i :.'
Interior Area Noise Exposure Analysis and Control
The intedor noise exposure is the difference between the projected extedor exposure at· ,,: :.'
· e bu,.ing ,a~de and the c~,culated noise reduction o, the building. Typi~l building
,: construction will provide a minimum 12 dB noise reduction with windows open and a
, minimum 20 dBA noise reduction with windows closed.
r:L'~0nservative situation with a 12.6 to 26.2 dBA CNEL noise reduction required for windows
-~ dosed conditions. The data in Tables 8, 9 and 10 shows that the windows in buildings
· !. facing 4th Street will require a "windows closed" condition and upgraded windows with a
"minim.m soun~ T,ansmission c,ass <s~c> rating o, 2g to meet the inte,io. noise
Transmission Class Rating of 28 to 29.
I
'1
I
I
26 !
I
I: TABLE 8
! ' ~ FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) '~'
INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL FOR WINDOWS (dBA)
W/STD. CONSTRUCTION
::" NOISE IMPACTS AT REQUIRED INTERIOR
_ ~tNGFAC~E <dBA CNEL>OPEN'OLOSED2NO,SE REDUCT,ON
!
I
I
I
[iiOf 12 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows open condition
of 20 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows closed condition
~k~bles~kl 1100~kk 11190~
N:1260-00-03
27
TABLE 9 '1'
SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR NO~E IMPACTS (dBA CNEL) :.:-.:
W/STD. CONSTRUCTION
NOISE IMPACTS AT REQUIRED INTERIOR
~JILDING FACADE (dBA_CNEL) OPEN~ CLOSED2 NOISE REDUCTION
':;. 2 70.7 58.7 50.7 25.7
~T-~.~'~*'- 71,2 59.2 51.2 26.2
I
I
,minimum of 12 dE, A noise reduction is assumed with a windows open condition I
'ninimum of 20 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows closed condition !..
· :N: 1260-00-03 2 8 I'"
ITABLE 10
ITHIRD FLOOR INTERIOR NOISE IMPACTS (dBA CNEL)
I ·
. INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL FOR WINDOWS (dBA) :
W/STD. CONSTRUCTION .:
I NOISE IMPACTS AT REQUIRED INTERIOR .:.
LDING FACADE (dBA CNEL) OpEN~ CLOSED2 NOISE REDUCTION ; .,.
.-:- 2 70,6 58,6 50,6 25.6
I '
I
I
I
limumof 12 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows open condition
imum of 20 dBA noise reduction is assumed with a windows closed condition
I.
:~k~bles~k 11100~kl 1190tb
N:126~0~03 2 9
I
OFF-SITE NOISE EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND CONTROL
This section~xamines the potential off-site noise impacts from the Empire Lakes -
Planning Area 6 Apartments.
Short-Term Construction Noise -I
Short-term construction noise represents a short-term impact on ambient noise levels.
· Noise generated by construction equipment, including trucks, graders, bulldozers,
~.~,:
::~i:~,.co, ncrete mixers and portable generators can reach high levels. Grading activities
i~.typically ~'epresent one of the highest potential sources for noise impacts. The most
i':7effeCtive method of controlling construction noise is through local control of construction
~.!'~0urs and by limiting the hours of construction to normal weekday working hours.
Construction noise is of short-term duration and will not have any long-term impacts on
the proiect site or the su~ounding area. To mi.imize noise impacts, the following
mitigation measures are recommended:
During construction the project should comply with the following requirements:
a. All construction vehicles or equipment fixed or mobile, operated within i...-.,=..~:,.~:
1,000 feet of a dwelling unit shall be equipped with properly operating and I
maintained mufflers. '
b. All operations shall comply with City Ordinances with respect to hours of
construction activity to minimize noise impacts. I
c. Dudng construction best efforts should be made to locate stockpiling and/or I
vehicle staging areas as far as practicable from existing residential
dwellings. I
30 I
I
i ! ~ i ~
~, 1
Traffic Noise'Contours ~
Noise contours represent the c~tance to noise levels of a constant value and are
measured from the center of the roadway. CNEL noise contours are determined below
' for the 60, 65 and 70 dBA noise levels. The CNEL computer printouts are included in
Appendix "E".
The average daily traffic volumes used to develop the CNEL noise contours are shown on
Table 11. Table 12 identifies the existing noise contours in the vicinity of the project site.
Table 13 presents the future noise contours for long-term build-out Year 2010 conditions.
The distances shown (in feet)' are measured from the centerline of the road to the
contour value shown. Table 14 presents the future year noise level increase associated
with the Year 2010 traffic conditions.
It should be noted that the values given in Tables 12 through 14 do not take into account
the effects of any noise barders (i.e., walls, buildings, topography or landscaping) that
may affect ambient noise levels. These factors will reduce noise levels and move the
noise contours closer to the centerline of the roadway.
TABLE 11 I
~. I AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1000's)~ ~- '1
SPEED FUTURE I
ROADWAY SEGMENT (MPH) EXISTING YEAR 2010
~ 4th Street w/o of Milliken Ave. 45 11.2 41.3
4th Street e/o of Milliken Ave. 45 18.2 41.3 I
~illiken Ave. n/o of 4th Street 45 17,8 45.8
Fv3illiken Ave. s/o of 4th Street 45 17.8 47.0 I
i I-15 Freeway n/o of 4th Street 65 132.0 218.2
-15 Freeway s/o of 4th Street 65 150.0 209.2
I - 10 Freeway w/o I- 15 Freeway 65 218.0 268.1 I
I I
I I
i i
~ !
JN:1260-00-03
32 '1
TABLE 12
.-~
r, ,~ ExisTING NOISE CONTOURS .~'
~ ~ ~ DISTANCE TO CONTOUR (FEET~
CNEL AT
100 FEET 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
ROAD SEGMENT (dBA) CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL
4th Street w/o of Milliken Ave. 62.9 34 73 157 338
~,th Street e/o of Milliken Ave. 65.0 47 101 217 468
4illiken Ave. '~/o of 4th Street 65.0 46 99 214 461
Il Milliken Ave. s/o of 4th Street 65.0 46 99 214 461
I-15 Freeway n/o of 4th Street 84.2 881 1,898 4,089 8,808
Illl I-15 Freeway s/o of 4th Street 84.7 959 2,067 4,452 9,592
-10 Freewa w/o I-15 Freewa ~ 1,080 2,326 ~ 10,797
~ ~ Measured from the centerline of the street
c:~kktables~kkl 1100\~kkl 1190tb 3 3
tJN:1260-00-03
i
TABLE 13 I
-.' FuTuR~ YEAR 20.~ .O,SE CO.TOURS' I
DISTANCE TO CONTOUR (FEET)
CNEL AT
100 FEET 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
ROAD SEGMENT (dBA) CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL
4th Street w/o of Milliken Ave. 68.6 81 174 375 807
4th Street e/o of Milliken Ave. 68.6 81 174 375 807
Milliken Ave. n/o of .4th Street 69.1 86 186 401 865
Milliken Ave. s/o of 4th Street 69.2 88 190 408 880
1-15 Freeway n/o of.4th Street 86.4 1,231 2,653 5,716 12,315
1-15 Freewa~/ s/o of.~,th Street 86.2 1,197 2,580 5,558 11,974
1-10 Freeway w/o 1-15 Freewa~ 86.4 1,239 2,670 5,753: 12,394
I
~ I
I t
I I
I
' = ~ Measured from the centerline o~ the street
~' ~ JN:1260-00-03
TABLE 14
IFUTURE YEAR NOISE LEVEL INCREASE~S ~
I,j ~ CNEL AT 100 FEET (dBA)
4th Street ~v/o of Milliken Ave. 62.9 68.6 5.7
65.0 68.6 3.6
4th Street ;/o of Milliken Ave,
~4illiken Ave. n/o of 4th Street 65.0 69.1 4.1
65,0 69.2 4.2
v~illiken Ave. s/o of 4th S~eet
I-15 Freewa~ n/o of 4th Street 84.2 86.4 2.2
84.7 86.2 1.4
-15 Freewa~ s/o of 4th Street
86.4 0.9
1-10Freewa fi/o1-15Freewa 85.5
t
..;
t
I-
:~ ~ c:~kk~bies~k11100~k11190tb
JN:1260-00-03 3 5
~ CONCLUSIONS I
': :I
· ~ '1
An acoustical analysis has been completed for Empire Lakes·- Planning Are~r 6
J Apartments project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. This analysis
indicates that for this site the future noise environment is expected to be dominated byI
~ vehicle noise from 4th Street. To meet the 65 dBA CNEL extedor noise standard, the
construction of a 6.0-foot high sound barder is required for all the first floor extedor patioI
~ areas in buildings facing 4th Street. The noise control findings show that the 45 dBA
CNEL intedor exposure limit is expected to be satisfied with a "windows closed" conditionI
I requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning) and upgraded windows
with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) Rating of 29 for window facing 4~ I
I Street.
I I
I !
] I
n I
a i
I
36 I
· I
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS
I
1
I
i'
APPENDIX A
i,:-j ' ' GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS ~,'
A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL. The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a
sound level meter using the A-weighted filter network. The A-weighting filter de-
emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner
similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical method of rating human judgment
of loudness.
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL.. The composite of noise from all sources near and far. In this
context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental
noise at a given location.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVEL (CNEL). The average equivalent A-
weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five (5) decibels to
sound levels in the evening from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. and after addition often (10) decibels
to sound levels in the night before 7 a.m, and after 10 p.m.
DECIBEL (dB). A unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to 20 times the
logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the
reference pressure, which is 20 micro-pascals.
edB(A). A-weighted sound level (see definition above).
EQUIVALENT SOUND LEVEL (LEQ). The sound level corresponding to a steady noise
level over a given sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual
time varying noise level. The energy average noise level during the sample period.
HABITABLE ROOM. Any room meeting the requirements of the Uniform Building Code
or other applicable regulations which is intended to be used for sleeping, living, cooking or
dining purposes, excluding such enclosed spaces as closets, pantries, bath or toilet
rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage
spaces, cellars, utility rooms and similar spaces.
Ii L(n). The A-weighted sound level exceeded during a certain percentage of the sample
time. For example, L10 in the sound level exceeded 10 percent of the sample time.
Similarly L50, Lg0, L99 etc.
I NOISE. Any unwanted sound or sound which is undesirable because it interferes with
speech and hearing, or is intense enough to damage hearing, or is otherwise annoying.
The State Noise Control Act defines noise as "...excessive undesirable sound...".
OUTDOOR LIVING AREA. Outdoor spaces that are associated with residential land
I'
uses typically used for passive recreational activities or other noise-sensitive uses. Such'1
spaces include patio areas, barbecue areas; jacuzzi areas, etc. associated with
residential uses; o~l~tdoor patient recovery or resting areas associated with hospitals,i'
convalescent hospitals, or rest homes; outdoor areas associated with places of worship
Which have a significant role in services or other noise-sensitive activities; and outdoor
"school facilities routinely used for educational purposes which may be adversely impactedI
by noise. Outdoor areas usually not included in this definition are: front yard areas,
driveways, greenbelts, maintenance areas and storage areas associated with residential
land uses; extedor areas at hospitals that are not used for patient activities; outdoor areas
associated with places of worship and principally used for short-term social gatherings;
and, outdoor areas a.ssociated with school facilities that are not typically associated with':
I'-'~
educational uses prone to .adverse noise impacts (for example, school play yard areas).
PERCENT NOISE LEVELS. See L(n).
SOUND LEVEL (NOISE LEVEL). The weighted sound pressure level obtained by use of I~'
a sound level meter having a standard frequency-filter for attenuating part of the sound ..
spectrum. I
SOUND LEVEL METER. An instrument, including a microphone, an amplifier, an output
meter, and frequency weighting networks for the measurement and determination of
noise and sound levels. I
' SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVEL (SENEL). The dB(A) level which, if it lasted I:'
for one second, would produce 'the same A-weighted sound energy as the actual event.'
I
I
I
,I
I
I'
APPENDIX B
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS
I~ ~ Land Use Co~npatiblity - Noise Environments :-
FIGURE V - 10
i:J ' LAND;USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS
COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE
I;!;:: LAND USE CATEGORY Ldn or CNEL, db
55 60 65 70 75 80
i ..... ,
Residential - Low Density '
Single Family, Duplex, Mobile Homes
Residential-Mu.ip e am,y
II Transient Lodging- Motels, Hotels
Hospitals, Nursing Homes
II Sports Arena, Outdoor Spectator Sports r
Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks
I! Golf Courses, Riding Stabies,
Water Recreation, Cemeteries
I! Office Buildings. Business Commercial
and Professional
I~ Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture
{ ~ Normally Acceptable: Specified land use ~ P n i II n I: New Con-
I] is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any struction or development should generally be dis-
buildings involved are of normal conventional con- couraged. If new construction or development does
i stnjction without any special insulation requirements. proceed. a detaileG analysis of the noise reduction
~ requirements must be made and needed noise insu-
IL, ~ n i i n II A I: New construc- lation features included in the design. Outdoor areas
tion or development should be undertaken only after a must be shielded.
"' detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements
I~ is made and needed noise insulation features inctud- NOrmally Unacceotable: New constnJc-
ed in the design. Conventional construction, but with tion or development should generally not be under-
= ;~ closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air taken. Construction costs to make the indoor envi-
li conditioning will normally suffice. Outdoor environ- ronment acceptable would be prohibitive and the
kl merit will seem noisy. outdoor environment would not be usable.
17.08.080 Performance standards. Page 1 053
Title 17 DEVELOPMENT CODE I
Chapter t7.08 RFSIEiENTIAL DISTRICTS
~ I
17.08.080 Performance standards.
A. Intent. The intent of this section is to protect properties in all residential districts and I
the health and safety of persons from environmental nuisances and hazards and to
provide a pleasing environment in keeping with the nature of the residential character. The I
performance standards set maximum tolerance limits on adverse environmental effects
created by any use or development of land. :..
I
B. Administration and MeaSurement. The standards of this section shall be enforced by '
the city planner. Upon discovery of any apparent violation of these standards, the city
planner shall investigate using such instruments as may be necessary. If a violation is ~.
found to exist, theviolation shall be abated as a nuisance as prescribed in this code.
~,.
.. C. Exemptions. The following sources of nuisances are exempt from the provisions of this
.~: section.
1. Emergency equipment, vehicles and devices; I
2. Temporary construction, maintenance, or demolition activities between the hours of six-
thirty a.m. and eight p.m., except Sundays and national holidays.
D. Noise.-No operation or activity shall cause any source of sound at any location or allow I';~
the creation of noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise ~:ontrolled by such
I
person, which Causes the ambient base noise levels to exceed the following standards, and .
as contained in Section 17.02.120. I"
Table 17.08.080(D) -'
RESIDENTIAL NOISE ,' DARDS(BXc)
STAN
Location of ' ' ''
rVleasurement JLM,,x,m,,m Allowable
I
1. Exterior [[55dBA 50dBA I
2. Interior I40dBA ¢5dBA
(A)
Notes:
(A) It is unlawful for an:/person at any location within the city to create any noise or to
allow the creation of any noise which causes the noise level when measured within any
other fully enclosed (windows and doors shut) residential dwelling unit to exceed the
interior noise standard in the manner described herein. I
(B) If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or
stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, the same I
procedures specified in Section 17.02.120 shall be deemed proper to enforce the
http://ordlink.com/codes/ranchocuj_DATA/TITLE17/.../17 08 080 Performance standard.htm 7/5/00 I'
Page 2 of 3
7'~08.080 Performance standards.
provisions of this section. "
(D) Ea, ch of the noise limits above shall be reduced 5dBA for noise consisting of impulse or
-.~
simpl~'tone noise.
1. Special Noise Provisions.
a. Peddlers-Use of Loud Noise, etc., to Advertise Goods, etc. No peddler Or mobile vendor
or any person in their behalf shall shout, cry out, or use any device or instrument to make
sounds for the purpose of advertising in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance.
b. Animal Noises. No person owning or having the charge, care, custody or control of any
dog, or other animal or fowl shall allow or permit the same to habitually howl, bark, yelp,
or make other noises, in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance.
c. Radios, Television Sets, Musical Instruments, and Similar Devices. No person shah
operate or permit the operation or playing of any device which reproduces, produces, or
amplifies sound: such as a radio, musical instrument, phonograph, or sound amplifier, in
such a manner as to create a noise disturbance as listed in Table 17.08.080(D):
i. Across any real property boundary or within Noise Zone I, between the hours of ten p.m.
and seven a.m. on the following day (except for activities for which a temporary use permit
is needed as prescribed in Section 17.04.070;
ii. At fifty feet (fifteen meters) from any such device, if operated on or over any public
right-of-way.
E. Vibration. No vibration shall be permitted which can be felt with or without the aid of
instruments at or beyond the lot line.
F. Heat or Cold. No operation or activity shall emit heat or cold which would cause a
temperature increase or decrease on any adjacent property in excess of ten degrees
Fahrenheit, whether the change is in the air, on the ground, or in any structure.
G. Glare. No operation, activity, sign, or lighting fixture shall create illumination which
exceeds five footcandles on any adjacent property, whether the illumination is direct or
indirect fight from the source. Glare levels shall be measured with a photoelectric
photometer following standard spectral luminous efficiency curve adopted by the
international Commission on Illumination.
H. Odors. No operation or activity shall be permitted of odorous gases or other odorous
matter in such quantities as to be dangerous, injurious, noxious, or otherwise
objectionable which is detectable with or without the aid of instruments at or beyond the
lot line.
I. Electrical or Electronic Disturbances. No operation or activity shall cause any source of
electricaI or electronic disturbance that adversely affects persons or the operation of any
equipment on any other lot and is not in conformonce with the regulations of the Federal
Communication Commission.
J. Air Quality. No operation or activity shall cause the emission of any smoke, fly ash, dust,
fumes, vapors, gases, or other forms of air pollution which can cause damage to health,
animals, vegetation, or other forms of property, or which can cause excessive soiling on
any other lot. No emission shall be permitted which exceeds the requirements of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District or the requirements of any Air Quality Plan
adopted by the city.
K. Fire and Explosion Hazards. An operation or activity involving the storage of fiammable
or explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard
of fire and explosion and adequate fire*fighting and fire suppression equipment and
devices in accordance with the requirements of the Foothill Fire District Uniform Building
Code, and Uniform Fire Code. Burning of waste materials in open fire is prohibited at any
point.
httn://ordlink.comJcodes/ranchocu/_DATA/TITLE17/"'/17 08 080 performance_standard.him 7/5/00
17.08.080 Performance ,standards. Page 3 6 f 3
I . . : ..
L. Fissionable or R av operatio~ or activities shall be De itted which
-adeoact e Materials. No rm
result at any time in the release or emission of any fissionable or radioactive materials into I
the atmosphere, the ground, or sewerage systems.
M. Liquid or Solid Waste. No operation or action shall discharge at any point into any
public street, public s.-wer, private sewa~r'~'disposal system, stream, body of water, or into I'':!
.the ground of any materials of such nature or temperature as can contaminate any water
Supply, interfere with bacterial processes in sewage treatment, or otherwise cause the
emission of dangerous or offensive elements, except in accord with standards approved by I .i
the California Department of Public Health or such other governmental agency as shall
have jurisdiction. (Ord. 211 § 6 (part), 1983)
I
:
I:'
I':1
I
I
I
I
I
http ://ordli~.co~co~es/rancboc~DA~NTIT~E I 7/..J 1 ? 08 080 ~effo~a~ce stand~d.htm 7/5/00 ~ "~
17'X)2.120 Noise abatement. ! Page I of 2
Title 17 DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter' 17.02 ADI, ZFiNISTRATtON
17.02.120 Noise abatement-
A. Purpose. In order to control unnecessary, excessive, and annoying noise and vibration
in the city, it is declared to be the policy of the city to prohibit such noise generated from
or by all sources as specified in this section.
B. Decibel Measurement Criteria. Any decibel measurement made pursuant to the
provisions of this section shall be based on a reference sound pressure of twenty micro-
pascals as measured with a sound level meter using the "A" weighted network (scale) at
slow response.
C. Designated Noise Zones. The properties hereafter described are hereby assigned the
following noise zones:
Noise Zone I: All single and multiple family residential properties.
Noise Zone I1: All commercial properties.
D. Exterior Noise Standards.
1. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise or allow
the creation of any noise on the property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled
by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on the property line of any
other property to exceed the basic noise level as adjusted below:
a. Basic noise level for a cumulative period of not more than fifteen minutes in any one
hour; or
b. Basic noise level plus five dBA for a cumulative period of not more than ten minutes in
any one hour; or
c. Basic noise level plus fourteen dBA for a cumulative period of not more than five
minutes in any one hour; or
d. Basic noise level plus fifteen dBA at any time.
2. If the measurement location is a boundary between two different noise zones, the lower
noise level standard shall apply.
3. If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or
I1stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, the
measured noise level obtained while the noise is in operation shall be compared directly to
the allowable noise level standards as specified respective to the measurement's location,
,.~ designated land use, and for the time of day the noise level is measured. The
I; reasonableness of temporarily discontinuing the noise generation by an intruding noise
source shall be determined by the city planner for the purpose of establishing the existing
· '~ ambient noise level at the measurement location.
Ii E. Special Provisions. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this
section:
;:";: 1. City- or school-approved activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and
I~. ~ public or private school grounds including, but not limited to, athletic and school
entertainment events between the hours of seven a.m. and ten p.m.;
I" http://ordlink.com/codes/ranchocu/_DATA/TITLE17/Cha"'/17 02 120 Noise_abatement_.htm 7/5/00
17.02.120 Noise abatement. Page 2 of 2
2. Occasional outdoor gatherings, dances, sho~s, and spoEting and enterta nment evenn~S,
provided said events are conducted pursuant to the approv'al of a temporary use permit ' I
issued by the city;
3. Any mechanical device, apparatus or equipment used, re~ated to or connected ,with
emergency machinery, vehicle, work or warning alarm or 'b~ll, provided the sounding of I
any bell or alarm on any building or motor vehicle shall terminate its operation within
thirty minutes in any hour of its being activated;
4. Noise sources associated with, or Vibration created by, construction, repair, remodeling I
or grading of any real property or during authorized seismic surveys, provided said
activities do not take place between the hours of eight p.m. and six-thirty a.m. on
weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and I
provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standard of sixty-five dBA plus the'
limits specified in Seotion 17.02.120(D)(1);
5. All devices, apparatus or equipment associated with agricultural operations provided: I :~!
a. Operations do not take place between eight p.m. and seven a.m. on weekdays, including
Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, or
b. Such operations and equipment are utilized for protection or salvage of agricultural I
crops during periods of potential or actual frost damage or other adverse weather
conditions, or
c. Such operations and equipment are associated with agricultural pest control through I
pesticicle 'application, provided the application is made in accordance with permits issued
by, or regulations enforced by, the California Department of Agriculture;
6. Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property, provided said activities I'
take place between the hours of eight a.m. and eight p.m. on any day except Sunday or
between the hours of nine a.m. and eight p.m. on Sunday;
7. Any activity to the extent regulation thereof has been preempted by state or federal law. I
F. Schools, Churches, Libraries, Health Care Institutions--Special Provisions. It is unlawful
for any person to create any noise which causes the noise level at any school, hospital or
similar health care institution, church, or library while the same is in use, to exceed the I
noise standards specified in this section and prescribed for the assigned noise zone in
which the school, hospital, church or library is located.
G. Administration. An2/act preating or permitting the creation of a noise disturbance as I'
defined by this code, not otherwise excluded by the preceding section of this code, shall
constitute a violation of this code and shall be abated as such.
H. Prima Facie Violation. Any noise exceeding the noise level standards for a designated I
noise zone as specified in this section shall be deemed to be prima facie evidence of a
violation of the provisions of this section. (Oral. 211 § 6 (part), 1983)
I
I
I
I
I
http://ordlink.com/codes/ra:nchocu/_DATA/TITfE17/Cha.../17 02 120 Noise abatement .htm 7/5/00 I
APPENDIX C
NOISE pROJECTION WORKSHEETS
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS - BASED U'PON FHWA - RD-77-108
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
DATE: 07-Jul-O0
SOURCE: DELIVERY TRUCKS BY: -,,~3. LAWSON
LOCATION: 1
OBSDIST= 1120.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 1120.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 *******~'
BARRIER = 0.0 (O=WALL,I=BERM
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 8.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 8.0
DROP-OFF= 15.0 (15 = 4.5 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF LEVEL 6 66.3 84.0 78.5 68.0 61.5 58.5
PROJ LEVEL 1120 32.2 49.9 44.4 33.9 27.4 24.4
SHIELDING 1120 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ LEVEL 1120 32.2 49.9 44.4 33.9 27.4 24.4
NOISE J3ARRIER CALC. ULATIONS - BASED UPON FHWA - RD-77-108
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
SOURCE: AUTOS DATE: 07-Jul-O0
LOCATION: i 9' BY: B. LAWSON
OBS DIST= 230.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 230.0
HTH WALL= 0.0
BARRIER = 0.0 (O=WALL, i=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 0.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = -4.96
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 0.0
DROP-OFF= 15.0 (15 = 4.5 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
.. DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 LSO
REF LEVEL 6 63.8 79.5 68.5 65.5 64.5 63.0
PROJ LEVEL 230 40.0 55.7 44.7 41.7 40.7 39.2
SHIELDING 230 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 .5.0 -5.0
ADJ LEVEL 230 35.1 50.8 39.8 36.8 35.8 34.3
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS - BASED UPON ~HWA -.RD-77-108 -
:
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
· DATE: 07.Jul-O0
SOURCE: TRASH COM.PACTOR BY: B.L.~WSON
LOC~TION: 1
OBS DIST= 1120.0
DT WALL: 0.0
DT W/OB= 1120.0
HTH WALL= 0.0
BARRIER = 0.0 (O=WALL, I=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 0.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = -4.96
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 0.0
DROP-OFF= 20.0 (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 LSO ,
REF LEVEL 3 72.2 85.5 82.5 77.0' 67.5 66.0
PROJ LEVEL 1120 20.8 34.1 31.1 25.6 16.1 14.6
SHIELDING 1120 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0
ADJ LEVEL 1120 15.8 29.1 26.1 20.6 11,1 9.6
NOISE BARRIER CALCWLATIONS - BASED t.)PON FHWA - RD.77-108
|
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
SOURCE: DELIVERY 'rRI. JCKS ,.. DATE: 07-Jul-O0
LOCATION: 2 '/- BY: B. LAWSON
OBS DIST= 640.0 .
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 640.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 **~**~"~'
BARRIER = 0.0 (O=WALL, I:BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 8.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = 0.00
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 8.0
DROP-OFF= 15.0 (:15 = 4.5 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50
REF LEVEL 6 66.3 84.0 78.5 68.0 61.5 58.5
PROJ LEVEL 640 35.9 53.6 48.1 37.6 31.1 28.1
SHIELDING 640 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ADJ LEVEL 640 35.9 53.6 48.1 37.6 31.1 28.1
NOISE BARRIER CALCULATIONS - BASED UPON FHWA- RD-77-108
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269.00-03
SOURCE:, AUTOS DATE: 07-Jul-Oe
LOCATIOf~i 2 BY: B..LAWSON
OBS DIST= 120.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 120.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 "***"'**
BARRIER = 0.0 (O=WALL,}=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 0.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = -4.96
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 0.0
DROP-OFF= ~5.0 (Z5 = 4.5 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
': DIST (~) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 LSO
REF LEVEL 6 63.8 79.5 68.5 65.5 64.5 63.0
PROJ LEVEL ~20 44.3 60.0 49.0 46.0 45.0 43.5
SHIELDING ~20 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0
ADJ LEVEL ~20 39.3 55.0 44.0 4LO 40.0 38.5
'
NOISE B,q, RRIER CALCULATIONS · BASED.UPON FHWA - RD-77-108
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
SOURCE: TRASH COMPACTOR DATE: 07-Jul-O0
LOCATION: 2 ~;' BY: B. LAWSON
· O'BS DIST= 640.0
DT WALL= 0.0
DT W/OB= 640.0
HTH WALL= 0.0 ***'~'***'~'
BARRIER = 0,0 (O=WALL,~=BERM)
OBS HTH= 5.0
NOISE HTH= 0.0 BARRIER+
OBS EL = 0.0 TOPO SHIELDING = -4.96
NOISE EL = 0.0 NOISE HTH EL= 0.0
DROP-OFF= 20.0 (20 = 6 dBA PER DOUBLING OF DISTANCE)
COFF
NOISE LEVELS (dBA)
DIST (FT) Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 LSO
REF LEVEL 3 72.2 85.5 82.5 77.0 67.5 66.0
PROJ LEVEL 640 25.6 38.9 35.9 30.4 20.9 ~9.4
SHIELDING 640 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0 -5.0
ADJ LEVEL 640 20.7 34.0 3~.0 25.5 Z6.0 ~4.5
t APPENDIX D
i CNEL COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
il
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NO~SE PRE~)|CTIf3N MODEL (CALVENO)
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4TH STREET DATE:' 05-Jul-00
LOCATION: BLDG_2 - 1ST FLOOR - NO WALL B'~..' B. LAWSON
SPEED = 45
PK HR % = 10
DIST NIF= 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE = 106.52
DT W~L= 113 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 106.45
DT W/OB= 0 HW TRUCK SLE DIST= 106.43
'
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE
~BIENT= 0.0
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 15
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 G~DE ADJUSTMENT-' 0.00
HEAWTRUCKS = 15 (ADjUSTMENT TO H~WTRUCKS)
PAD EL = 34.5 EL AUTOMOBILES = ~.8
' ROAD EL = 32.8 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 36.8
40.8
VEHICLE ~PE DAY EVENING NIGHT DALLY
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
HEAW TRUCKS
AUTOMOBILES LEO 67.3 65.4 63.7 57.6 66.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEO 58.4 56.9 50.5 49.0 57.6
VEHICU~R NOISE 68.4 66.6 ~.0 58.7 67.8
CNEL
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO
VEHICU~R NOISE 68.4 66.6 ~.0 58.7 67.8
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEQW]THOUTTOPO OR BARRIER = 68.4 68.4
MIT PK HR LEO WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 68.4 ....... 68.4
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 67.8 67.8
MIT CNEL WiTH TOPO AND BARRIER = 67.8 ....... 67.8
FHVVA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO)
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269~00-03
· ROADWAy,~4TH STREET DATE: 05--Jul-00
LOCATION:' BLDG_2 - 1 ST FLOOR WITH WALL BY: B. LAWSON ~* I'
ADT = 41,300 PK HR VOL = 4,130
SPEED = 45 I'.
PKHR%= 10
CTL DIST= 113
DIST N/F= 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE = 107.57
DT WALL= 113 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 107.48 I
DT W/OB= 0 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST= 107.42
HTH WALL= 6.0 ........
OBS HTH=. 5,0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE I:::!
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90 I~i.~
DF ANGLE= 180
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 15
I'
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 GRADE ADJUSTMENT-' 0.00 '
HEAVY TRUCKS = 15 {ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL.I=BERM)
PAD EL = 34.5 ' EL AUTOMOBILES = 34.8 I :'
ROAD EL = 32.8 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 36.8
GRADE = Q4 % EL HEAVY TRUCKS = 40.8
I
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 :
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 I
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHI~=LDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEO CNEL I
AUTOMOBILES LEO 67.3 65,4 63.6 57.5 66.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEEQ 58.3 56.8 50.4 48.9 57,6
HEAVY TRUCKS LEQ 58.9 57.4 48.4 49.7 58.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.3 665 63.9 58.7 67.8 I
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING I
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = 68.3 68.3 I
MIT PK HR LEQ WITFI TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.1 ....... 58.1
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 67.8 67.8
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 57.6 ....... 57.6 I
I
FHWA~RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (C
..
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
DATe:: 0,5-~'ul-00
ROADWAY: 4TH STREET B: ~AWSON
LOCATION: BLDG._2 * 2ND FLOOR BY:
PK HR VOL = 4,130
ADT = 41,300
SPEED = 45
PKHR%= 10
CTL DIST= 113
DISTN/F= 76 (M=76,P=52.S=36,C=12) AUTOSLEDtSTANCE= 107.43
DT WALL= 113 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 107.17
HVY TRUCK SLE DIST= 106.77
DT W/OB= 0
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
HEAVY TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,I=BERM)
PAD EL = 34.5 EL AUTOMOBILES = 34.8
ROAD EL = 32.8 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 36.8
40.8
GRADE = 0.4 % EL HEAVY TRUCKS =
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
HEAVY TRUCKS 0,865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 70.2 68.3 66.5 60.4 69.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEO 61.2 59.7 53.3 51.8 60.5
60.4 51.3 52.6 61.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.2 69.4 66.8 61.6 70.7
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEO CNEL
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.2 69.4 66.8 61.6 70.7
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEO WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = 71.2 71.2
MIT PK HR LEO WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 71.2 ....... 71.2
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER 70.7 70.7
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER 70.7 ....... 70.7
FHWA-RD-'~7-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO)
!
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4,TH STREET DATE: 05-Jul.-00
LocAT,oN: *_ G_ :-TH,RDPLOOR BY: B. ,SO.
ADT = 41,300 PK HR VOL = 4,130
SPEED = 45
PKHR%= 10
CTL DiST= 113
DIST N/F= 76 M=76.P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE = 109.25
DT WALL= 113 MED TRUCK SLE DiST= 108.81
DT W/OB= 0 H~ TRUCK SLE DIST= 108.05
HTH W~L= 0.0
OBS HTH= 25.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE. 15=SO~ SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 10 G~DE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
H~W TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAW TRUCKS)
BARRIER = 0 (0=W~L,I=BERM)
PAD EL = 34.5 EL AUTOMOBILES = 34.8
ROAD EL = 32.8 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 36.8
G~DE = 0.4 % EL HEAW TRUCKS = 40.8
VEHICLE ~PE DAY EVENING NIGHT DA~LY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
HEAW TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEQ 70.1 68.2 66.4 60.4 69.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.1 59.6 53.3 51.7 60.4
H~W TRUCKS LEQ 61.7 60.3 51.3 52.5 61.0
VEHICU~R NOISE 71.1 69.3 66.8 61.5 70.6
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEO CNEL
VEHICU~R NOISE 71.1 69.3 66.8 61.5 70.6
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEQ WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = 71.1 71.1
MiT PK HR LEO WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 71.1 ....... 71.1
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER 70.6 70.6
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 70.6 ....... 70.6
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE pREDICTION ~ODEL ~CALVENO)
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4TH STREET DATE: 05-JuI-D0
LOCATION: BLDG_4 - 1ST FLOOR - NO WALL BY: B.L.~NSON
ADT = 41,300 PK HR VOL = 4,130
SPEED = 45
PKHR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
DIST NIF= 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTOSLE DISTANCE= 92.74
DT WALL= 100 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 92:62
DT WIOB= 0 H~ TRUCK SLE DIST= 92.50
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 5.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 15
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 G~DE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00
HEA~ TRUCKS = 15 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEA~ TRUCKS)
PAD EL = 34.0 EL AUTOMOBILES = 32.3
ROAD EL = 30.3 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 34.3
VEHICLE ~PE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.~8 0.049 0.103 0.0184
HEA~ TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
NO3SE iMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
AUTOMOBILES LEO 68.2 66.3 ~.6 58.5 67.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEO 59.3 57.8 51.4 49.9 58.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.3 67.5 ~.9 59.6 68.7
VEHICU~R NOISE 69.3 67.5 64,9 59.6 68.7
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
MIT PK HR LEO WiTH TOPO AND BARRIER = 69.3 ....... 69.3
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER 6~.7 68.7
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER 68.7 ....... 68.7
·
FHVVA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO)
· ~ - ~ ~ ,
i
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4TH S'~'REET ~' DATE: 05-Jul-00
LOCATION: BLDG_4 - 1ST FL0~R WITH WALL BY: B. LAWSON I"
ADT = 41,300 PK HR VOL = 4,130
SPEED = 45 I:'
PKHR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100 '
DIST N/F= 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE = 93.82
DT WALL= 100 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 93.67
DT WIOB= 0 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST= 93.51
HTH WALL= 6.0
OBS HTH= 5.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE !
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
li~
DF ANGLE= 180
SITE CONDITIONS (10=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE)
AUTOMOBILES = 15
I'
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 15 G~DE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00 '
HEA~ TRUCKS = 15 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEA~ TRUCKS)
BARRIER = 0 (0=W~L,I=BERM)
PAD EL = 34.0 EL AUTOMOBILES = 32.3
ROAD EL = 30.3 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 34.3
G~DE = 0.4 % EL HEAVY TRUCKS = 38.3
VEHICLE ~PE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAJLY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 ',
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184
H EAW TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING ~':
PK HR LEQ DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEEQ 59.2 57.7 51.3 49.8 58.5
HEAW TRUCKS LEO 59.8 58.4 49.3 50.6 59.0
VEHICU~R NOISE 69.2 67.4 ~.8 59.6 68.7
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEO DAY LEO EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEO CNEL
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.9 57.1 ~.5 49.3 58.4
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEO WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = 69.2 69.2
MIT PK HR LEO WITFt TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.9 ....... 58.9
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 68.7 68.7
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 58.4 ....... 58.4
I
i FI-~VA-RD-77-10S HIGHWAY ~lolse pREDICTION MODEL (CALVEN, O)
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4TH STREET DATE: 05-Jui-00
LOCATION: BLDG_4 - 2ND FLOOR BY: B.~WSON
ADT = 41,300 PK HR VOL: 4,130
SPEED: 45
pKHR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
DISTN/F= 76 (M:76,P=52,S:36,C=12) AUTOSLEDISTANCE= 93.99
DT WALL= 100 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 93:66
DT W/OB= 0 HW TRUCK SLE DIST: 93.11
HTH WALL= 0.0
OBS HTH= 15.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE
AMBIENT: 0.0
ROADWAY V~EW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90
DF ANGLE= 180
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 10 G~DE ADJUSTMENT-' 0.00
H~W TRUCKS = 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO H~W TRUCKS)
PAD EL = 34.0 EL AUTOMOBILES = 32.3
ROAD EL = 30,3 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS-' 34.3
VEHICLE ~PE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.~8 0.049 0.103 0.0184
HEAW TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
AUTOMOBILES LEO 70.7 68.8 67.1 61.0 70.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.8 60.3 53.9 52.4 61.1
VEHICU~R NOISE 71.8 70.0 67.4 62.2 71.2
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEO CNEL
VEHtCU~R NOISE 71.8 70.0 67.4 62.2 71.2
PK HR LEO WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = 71.8 71.8
MIT PK HR LEO WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 71.8
CNEL WITHOUT TOPO AND BARRIER = 71.2 71.2
MIT C~L WITH TOPO AND BARRIER
' I
i FHV(/A-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOI~;E PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO)
PROJECT: GENEP, AL DYNAMICS APARTMENTS JOB #: 1269-00-03 I
ROADWAY: 4TH STREET , DATE: 05-Jul-00
LOCATION: BLDG_4 - 3RD FLOOR ~' BY: B. LAWSON I
ADT = 41,3.00 PK HR VOL = 4,130
SPEED = 45 I
PKHR%= 10
CTL DIST= 100
DIST N/F= 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE = 96.28 I
DT WALL= 100 MED TRUCK SLE DIST= 95.74
DT W/OB= 0 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST= 94.79
HTH WALL= 0.0 ........
OBS HTH= 25.0 40 =DISTANCE TO TOE OF SLOPE
AMBIENT= 0.0
ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE= -90
RT ANGLE= 90 '-
DF ANGLE= 180
SITE CONDITIONS (1D=HARD SITE, 15=SOFT SITE) ~-~:
AUTOMOBILES = 10
MEDIUM TRUCKS = 10 GRADE ADJUSTMENT= 0.00 I
HEAVY TRUCKS = . 10 (ADJUSTMENT TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,I=BERM)
PAD EL = 3z-.0 ELAUTOMOBILES = 32.3 I
ROAD EL = 30.3 EL MEDIUM TRUCKS= 34.3
GRADE = 0.4 % EL HEAVY TRUCKS = 38.3
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT DAILY I
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.9742 '
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.0184 I
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.0074
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING
PK HR LEQ DAY LEO EVEN LEO NIGHT LEQ CNEL I
AUTOMOBILES LEO 70.6 68.7 67.0 60.9 70.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS LEQ 61.7 60.2 53.8 52.3 61.0
HEAVY TRUCKS LEO 62.3 60.9 51.9 53.1 61.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.7 69.9 67.3 62.1 71.1 I
NOISE IMPACTS WITH TOPO AND BARRIER SHIELDING I
PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEO NIGHT LEQ CNEL
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.7 69.9 67.3 62.1 71.1 I
W/O AMBIENT W/AMBIENT
PK HR LEO WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER = 71.7 71.7 I
MIT PK HR LEO WITH TOPO AND BARRIER = 71.7 ' ...... 71.7
CNEL WITHOUT TOP() AND BARRIER 71.1 71.1
MIT CNEL WITH TOPO AND BARRIER 71.1 ....... 71.1 I
I
.APPENDIX E
CNEL NOISE CONTOUR PROJECTIONS
! FH]C,/A-RD-77-108 ROADWAY.TRAFfIC NOISE pREDICTION MODEL (CNEL)
PROJE~'T: GENERAL DyNAMICS/P/~LMER GOLF COURSE APTS. ~ JN: 1269-00-03
· DATE: 05-Jul-00
ROADWAY: 4th"Street BY: B. LAWSON
SEGMENT: w/o of Milliken 'Ave.
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: EXISTING CONDITIONS PK HR VOL 1,120
ADT
SPEED 45 MPH
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0--WALL,1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY I EVE ~ NIGHT ~ DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129- 0.096 0.972
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.007
UNATFENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQpKHRI LEQDAyI LEQEVE ILEQNIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 61.7 59.8 58.0 51.9 61.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.4 53.9 47.6 46.0 54.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.3 54.9 45.8 47.1 55.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.5 61.8 58.6 53.9 62.9
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I S0 I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 34 73 157 338
FHWA-RD-TT-108 ROADWAY:TRAFFiC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (C. NEL) !
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS/PALMER GOLE GOURSE APTS. 1JN: 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: 4th Strest '~ i DATE: 05-Jul-00
i
SEGMENT: e/o of Milliken Ave. BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Gucamonga
SGENARIO: EXISTING GONDITIONS
ADT 18,200 ADT ~' PK HR VOL 1,820
SPEED 45 MPH
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT i
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6 .
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5'
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT '1 -
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15 ~""i
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1 =BERM) ,
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT "~jl
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION: i
I DAY t EVE I NIGHT I DAILY I
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0,848 0.049 0.103 0.018 ,
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.007
UNATi'ENUATED NOISE LEVELS: I
ILEQ PK HR ] LEO DAY ~ LEO aVE I LEQ NIGHTI CNEL I
AUTOMOBILES 63.8 61.9 60.1 54.1 63.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.5 56.0 49.7 48.1 56.8 '1
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.4 57.0 47.9 49.2 57.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.6 63.9 60.7 56.0 65.0 /
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 47 101 217 468
!
i
I
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRA~=FIC NOISE PRED CTION MODEL (CNEL)
ROADWAY: - DATE: 0.5-Jul-00
SEGMENT: n/o of 4th Street BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: EXISTING CONDITIONS . ~.
ADT 17,800 .ADT PK HR VOL 1,780
SPEED 45 MPH
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL, 1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0:0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY t EVE I NIGHT I DALLY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0,129 - 0.096 0.972
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.007
UNATTENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
iLEQ PK HR I LEO DAY I LEO EVE I LEO NIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 63.7 61.8 60.0 54.0 63.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.5 55.9 49.6 48.0 56.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.3 56.9 47.8 49.1 57.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.5 63.8 60.6 55.9 65.0
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
No~SE LEVEL: I 70 I 88 I 60 I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 46 99 214 461
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) . I'
PROJECT: GENEF~L DYNAMICS/PALMER G(:~_F COURSE AIpTS. JN: ~. 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: Milliken Ave. ~j DATE: 05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: s/o of 4th Street ' B~?: B. LAWSON I
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: EXISTING CONDITIONS ·
SPEED 45 MPH - '
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S--36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6 ..
DISTWALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5 I'
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
LF ANGLE ' -90 DGR "'
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5) .
AUTOMOBILES 15 i,~:'
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1 =BERM) i
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT ~L*Ji
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT '
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS '.
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY I EVE t NIGHT i DAILY i "'
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 . 0.096 0,972 ~1:'
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0,848 0.049 0.103 0.018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0,865 0.027 0.108 0.007
I
UNATI'ENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQPKHRI LEO DAYI LEO EVE ILEQN~GHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 63.7 61.8 60.0 54.0 63.2 I
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.5 55.9 49.6 48.0 56.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.3 56.9 47.8 49.1 57.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.5 63.8 60.6 55.9 65.0 /
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NO~SE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I 60 I 55 I~:
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 46 99 214 461
:1
i
I
FHWA-RD-~7-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL)
PROJECT: GENEFtiAL DyI,:IAMIGS/PALMER GOLF C~URSE APTS. ' JN: ~ 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: I-15 Freeway " DATE: 05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: n/o of 4th Street BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: EXISTING CONDITIONS
ADT 132,000 ADT "" PK HR VOL 13,200
SPEED 65 MPH
.PKHR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 144 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 69.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
DIST W/OR 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH ORS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR . .
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
} DAY ~ EVE I NIGHT I DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0,775 0.129 - 0.096 0.819
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.084
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.097
UNATFENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQ PK HR I LEa DAY I LEa EVE I LEQ NIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 78.0 76.1 74.3 68.3 77.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 78.4 76.9 70,6 69,0 77,7
HEAVY TRUCKS 82.4 81.0 71,9 73,2 81,6
VEHICULAR NOISE 84.8 83.3 77.3 75.5 84.2
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I S0 I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 881 1898 4089 8808
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE ~REDI~TION MODEL (CNEL) :
'F~OJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS/PALMER GOLF CO~)RSE APTS.! JN: 1269-00-d3
ROADWAY: I-15 Freeway ~ DATE: 0~-Jul-00
SEGMENT: s/o of 4th Street BY: . B. LAWSON I
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: EXISTING CONDITIONS
ADT '150.000 ADT PK ~VOL 15,000
SPEED 66 MPH
PK HR 10 %
'DIST CTL 100 ~
DIST N/F 1~1 R (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 69.6 .
DIST WALL 0 ~ MED TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HW TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5 :
HTH W~L 0 ~
HTH OBS 5 ~
ROADWAY VIEW: ,~ :_1
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I O, SO~ SITE=I 5) ~'
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HW TRUCKS 15
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
H~W TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
G~DE: 0 % G~DE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO H~W TRUCKS.
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I D~Y I EVE I NIGHT I DAILY I ..
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0,129 0.096 0.819
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.084
HEAW TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.097
':1
UNA~ENUATED NOISE LEVELS: ~"*
ILEQPKHRI LEQDAYI LEQEVE tLEQNIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 78.5 76.7 74.9 68.8 78.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 79.0 77.5 71.1 69.6 78.3
H~W TRUCKS 82,9 81.5 72.5 73,7 82.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 85.4 83.9 77.9 76.0 84.7
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
.o,ss LEVEL: I 7o I 65 I so I 55 I
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 959 2067 ~52 9592
I
I
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL)
PRDJECT: GENERAL DyNAMICS/PALMER GpLF COURSE AP'I;:S. JN: f269-00-0:'~
ROADWAY: I-10 Freeway ~j : DATE: .05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: W/o 1-15 Freeway BY: .B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: EXISTING CONDITIONS ·
· ,v. PKHRVOL 21,800
ADT 218,000 ADT
SPEED 65 MPH
PKHR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST NIF 144 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 69.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=~I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0,0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY I EVE I NIGHT I DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 - 0.096 0.879
0.848 0.049 0,103 0.035
MEDIUM TRUCKS
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.086
UNATEENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQpKHRI LEQDAYt LEQEVE ILEQNIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 80.5 78.6 76.8 70.8 80.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 76.8 75.3 68.9 67.3 76.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 84.1 82.6 73.6 74.8 83.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 86,2 84.6 79.0 76.8 85.5
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 7O I 66 I 60 I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 1080 2326 5012 10797
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) ~
PROJE~T: GENEF~,L DYNAMICiS/PALMER GOLF COURSE APTS, JN:
ROADV{/AY: 4th Street DATE:
SEGMENT: w/o of Ivlilliken Ave. BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: FUTURE CONDITIONS
ADT 41,300 ADT PK HR VOL 4,,~.30
SPEED 4.5 MPH
PK HR 10 %
-DIST CTL 1C,0 FT
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL, 1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY I EVE
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.972
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0,865 0.027 0.108 0.007
UNATTENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQPKHR
AUTOMOBILES 67.3 65.4 63.7 57.6 66.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.1 59.6 53.2 51.7 60.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.0 60.5 51.5 52.7 61.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.2 67.4 64.3 59.6 68.6
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I 60 I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 81 174 375 807
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY '~'RAFFI(; NOISE pREDICTION MODEL (OlsIEL)
PROJECT: · GENERAL DyNAMICS/PAI~MER G'OLF;COURSE APTS. ~JN: 1269-00-03
' bATE: 05-Jul-00
ROADWAY: 4th Stredet
SEGMENT: e/o of Milliken Ave. BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: FUTURE CONDITIONS .;,. PK HR VOL 4,130
ADT 41,300 ADT
SREED 45 MPH
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P-'52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0:0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY I EVE I NIGHT I DALLY
AUTOMOBILES 0,775 0.129 - 0.096 0.972
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.007
UNATTENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQpKHRI LEQDAYI LEO EVa ILEQNIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 67.3 65.4 63.7 57.6 66.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.1 59.6 53.2 51.7 60.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.0 60.5 51.5 52.7 61.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.2 67.4 64.3 59.6 68.6
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I 60 I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 81 174 375 807
~ FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MdDEL (C~NEL)
IPROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS/PALMER GOLF COURSE APTS. t JN:~ ; 1269-00-03
~ROADWAY:: MiIliken Ave. ~ DATE: ~ 05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: n/o of 4th Street BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamon9a
'SCENARIO:~ FUTURF_ CONDITIONS
ADT 45,800 ADT PK HR VOL 4.5i0
SPEED 45 MPH
PK HR 10 %
'DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92,6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
-' SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 16
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,I=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
DAY I EVE I NIGHT I DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 0.096 0.972
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0,848 0.049 0.103 0.018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0,027 0.108 0.007
UNATTENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQPKHRI LEQDAYI LEQEVE ILEQNIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 67.8 65.9 64.1 58, 1 67.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.6 60.0 53.7 52.1 60.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 62,4 61.0 51.9 53.2 61.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.6 67.9 64.7 60.1 69.1
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I 60 I 55 I
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 86 186 401 865
FH - . , MODEL (CNEL)
PROJECT: JN:' ~ 1269-00-03
ROADWAY: Milfiken Ave. ~ DATE: 05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: s/o of 4th Street BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: FUTURE CONDITIONS
ADT 47.000 ADT PK HR VOL 4,700
SPEED 45 MPH
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST NIF 76 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 92.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 92.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1 =BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 ' 0.096 0,972
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0,018
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.007
UNATTENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQpKHRI LEQDAYI LEQEVE ILEQNIGHTI CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 67.9 66.0 64.2 58.2 67.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.7 60.2 53.8 52.3 60.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.5 61.1 52.1 53.3 61.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 69,7 68.0 64.8 60.2 69.2
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 I 60 I 85
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 88 190 408 880
|
ROADWAY: 1-15 Freeway DATE: 05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: ' n/o of 4th Street BY: B, LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: ; FUTURE CONDITIONS · 1
ADT '~ 218,200 ADT PK HR VOL 21,820
SPEED 65 MPH
.PK HR 10 % i
DIST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 144 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 69.6. ~-!~,
DISTWALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
HTH WALL 0 FT "
ROADWAY VIEW: -.
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RTANGLE 90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
-'- SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=-10, SOFT SITE=15)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,I=BERM) I 'J
ELEVATIONS: I
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS i
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
[ DAY I EVE I N~GHT IDAILY I
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0,084
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0,097
UNATi'ENUATED NOISE LEVELS: i
ILEQpKHRI LEODAYI LEO EVE ILEQNIGHTI CNEL I
AUTOMOBILES 80.2 78.3 76.5 70.4 79.7 !
MEDIUM TRUCKS 80.6 79.1 72.7 71.2 79.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 84.6 83.1 74.1 75.4 83.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 87.0 85.5 79.5 77.7 86.4
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 i 65 I 60 I 55 I I
DISTANCE TO CN EL (FT) 1231 2653 5716 12315
I
i
I
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PI~EDICTIQN MODEL (CNEL) i
PROJECT: GENERAL DYNAMICS/PALMER GOLF COUR{BE APTS.
269.{00- '
ROADWAY: I-15 Freeway ~ DATE: 05-Ju{-00
SEGMENT: s/o of 4th Street BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of RanchO Cucamonga
SCENARIO: FUTURE CONDITIONS '
APT 2O9.2OO PK HR 20, 20
SPEED 65 ~PH
PK HR 10 %
DIST CTL 100 FT
D{ST N/F 1~ ~ (~=76,P=52,S=Z6) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 69.6
DIST ~ALL 0 FT ~ED TRUCK SLE D{ST 69.5
D}ST ~/OB 100 ~ H~ TRUCK SLE D{ST B9.5
HTH ~ALL 0 ~
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY V{E~:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
RT ANGLE 90 DOR
DF ANGLE qS0 DGR
SITE COND{TIONS: (HARD S{TE=I 0, SOPT S{TE=I 5)
AUTOmOBiLeS 15
~ED TRUCKS 15
H~ TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=~ALL,1
EL~ATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT ~ED{U~ TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
. HEA~ TRUCKS = 8.0q FT
G~DE: 0 % G~DE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEA~ TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY] EVE I NIGHT{ DAILY
AUTOMOBtLES 0.775 0.129 ' 0.096 0.819
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.848 0.049 0.103 0.084
HEAW TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.097
UNA~ENUATED NOISE L~ELS:
ILEQ pKHRI LEQ DAY
AUTOMOBILES 80.0 78.1 76.3 70.3 79,5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 80.4 78.9 72.6 71.0 79.7
HEAW TRUCKS 84.4 83.0 73.9 75.2 83.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 86.8 85.3 79.3 77.5 86.2
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NOISE LEVEL: I 70 I s5 so I 55
DISTANCE TO CNEL (FT) 1197 2580 5558 11974
FHWA-RD-77-108 F~OADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE pREDICTION MODEL (CNEL)
e
ROADWAY: - ' DATE: 05-Jul-00
SEGMENT: w/o I-15 Freeway BY: B. LAWSON
LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamonga
SCENARIO: FLRURE CONI~ITIONS
ADT 268,100 ADT ' PK HR VOL 26,810
SPEED 65 MPH
PK HR 10 %
DiST CTL 100 FT
DIST N/F 144 FT (M=76,P=52,S=36) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 69.6
DIST WALL 0 FT MED TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
DIST W/OB 100 FT HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 69.5
HTH WALL 0 FT
HTH OBS 5 FT
ROADWAY VIEW:
LF ANGLE -90 DGR
DF ANGLE 180 DGR
SITE CONDITIONS: (HARD SITE=I 0, SOFT SITE=I 5)
AUTOMOBILES 15
MED TRUCKS 15
HVY TRUCKS 15
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL, I=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:
PAD 0 FT AUTOMOBILES = 0.00 FT
ROAD 0 FT MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30 FT
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 FT
GRADE: 0 % GRADE ADJUSTM 0.0 DB TO HEAVY TRUCKS
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:
I DAY I EVE I NIGHT I DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.775 0.129 - 0.096 0.879
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0,848 0.049 0.103 0.035
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.865 0.027 0.108 0.086
UNATTENUATED NOISE LEVELS:
ILEQ PK HR I LEO DAY I LEa EVE I LEQ NIGHTICNEL
AUTOMOBILES 81.4 79.5 77.7 71.6 80.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 77.7 76.2 69.8 68.2 76.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 84.9 83.5 74.5 75.7 84.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 87.1 85.5 79.9 77.7 86.4
DISTANCES TO CONTOUR LINES:
NO~SE LEVEL: I 70 I 65 t 60 I 55
DISTANCE TO CN EL (FT) 1239 2670 5753 12394
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX B
GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
LOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
I Soil Engineering · Geology ·Environmental
i
I
I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION
PALMER GOLF COURSE APARTMENTS
I PARCEL 6, PARCEL MAP NO. 14647
4TM STREET AND EMPIRE LAKES GOLF COURSE
i RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I
i
I
I PROJECT NO. 60631.12
JUNE 22, 2000
I
I
I
Prepared For:
I FF Development, L.P.
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200
I San Diego, California 92121
i Attention: Ms. Angela Renteria
I
6121 Quail Valley Court · Riverside, CA 92507 · (909) 653-1760 · Fax (909) 653-1741
LOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
I Soil Engineering · Geology · Environmental
I June 22, 2000
I
FF Development, L.P.
I 5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92121
I Attention: Ms. Angela Renteria
I Gentlemen:
Transmitted with this letter is our report entitled Preliminary Geotechnical
t Investigation, Palmer Golf Course Apartments, Parcel 6, Parcel Map No. 14647, 4th
Street and Empire Lakes Golf Course, Rancho Cucamonga, California, prepared for FF
Development, L.P., Project No. 60631.12.
This report was based upon a scope of services generally outlined in our proposal letter
1 dated April 6, 2000 and other written and verbal communications.
It has been our pleasure assisting you on this project. If you have any questions or
I comments concerning the information in this report, please contact us.
I Respectfully submitted,
LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc.
I JJJ:JPL:qam
I. Distribution: Addressee (6)
I
I
6121 Quail Valley Court · Riverside, CA 92507 · (909) 653-1760 · Fax (909) 653-174!
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
I Page No.
INTRODUCTION ..............................................
I PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS .................................... 2
:1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS .................................... 2
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ANALYSIS ................................. 3
I SUBSURFACE FIELD INVESTIGATION .............................. 5
LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ................................ 5
I GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ....................................... 6
Regional Geologic Conditions ................................ 6
I Site Geologic Conditions ................................... 6
Groundwater Hydrology .................................... 7
Mass Movement ......................................... 8
'1 Faulting ............................................... 8
Historical Seismicity ...................................... 8
Secondary Seismic Hazards ................................. 9
i SOILS AND SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA (Uniform Building Code) ........... 10
UBC Divisions IV; Earthquake Design Criteria Selection ............. 10
I UBC Division V; Soil Profile ................................ 12
UBC Earthquake Design Summary ............................ 12
i CONCLUSIONS ............................................. 12
General .............................................. 12
Foundation Support ...................................... 13
i Geologic Mitigations ..................................... 13
Seismicity .................................. : ......... 14
RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................ 14
General Site Grading ..................................... 14
Initial Site Preparation .................................... 15
Preparation of Fill Areas ................................... 15
I Preparation of Foundation Areas ............................. 16
Engineered Compacted Fill ................................. 16
Short Term Excavations ................................... 17
I Soil Expansiveness ...................................... 17
Foundation Design ...................................... 17
Settlement ............................................ 18
I Slabs-On-Grade ......................................... 18
Wall Pressures ......................................... 19
Preliminary Pavement Design ............................... 20
I Sulfate Protection ....................................... 21
Construction Monitoring ................................... 21
I
IJ, J0]~ GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
LIMITATIONS .............................................. 22 I
CLOSURE ................................................. 23 I
REFERENCES ............................................... 24
APPENDICES I
Appendix A - Index Map, Plats, and EPI Output '1
Appendix B - Field Investigation Program and Boring Logs
Appendix C - Laboratory Testing I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
LOR o~o'~e..,~,,,~.o.,.,,.~.
I
i FF Development, L,P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I INTRODUCTION
iDuring May of 2000, a Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation was performed by LOR
Geotechnical Group, inc. for the proposed Palmer Golf Course Apartments to be
located on the north side of 4th Street west of Milliken Avenue in the city of Rancho
I Cucamonga, California. The purpose of this investigation was to provide a technical
evaluation of the geologic setting of the site and to provide geotechnical design
I recommendations for the proposed development. The scope of our services included:
· Review of available pertinent geotechnical literature, reports, maps, and agency
I information pertinent to the study area;
· Interpretation of stereo aerial photograph pairs of the site and surrounding
I regions dated 1938 through 1996;
· Geologic field reconnaissance mapping to verify the areal distribution of earth
units and significance of surficial features as compiled from documents,
I literature and reports reviewed,
· A subsurface field investigation to determine the physical soil conditions
I pertinent to the proposed development;
· Laboratory testing of selected soil samples obtained during the field
investigation;
I · Development of geotechnical recommendations for site grading and foundation
design; and
· Preparation of this report summarizing our findings, and providing conclusions
I and recommendations for site development.
I The approximate location of the site is shown on the attached Index Map, Enclosure
A-1 within Appendix A.
I To orient our investigation at the site, a 100 - scale Site Study Map, prepared by
Architects Orange, stamp dated April 4, 2000, was furnished for our use. Prior to
I finalization of our report, an 80-scale Site Plan prepared by ARK Architecture and
Planning was also provided. The locations of buildings and number of units has
changed from the original Site Study Map to the current Site Plan. However, this
I change has no significant impact on our geotechnical investigation. The proposed
building locations were indicated on this plan. An 60-scale Topographic Map of the
I area, prepared by AEI-CASC Engineering, Inc., was also utilized.
i 1
IlJ0]:~ GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
Information furnished this firm indicates the proposed project will consist of a two
phase apartment complex to be developed on the 23.4 acre site. The individual site
development information is presented in the following table:
Site Number of Buildings: Number of Number of Parking
Phase Apartments/Clubhouse Apartment Units* Spaces
I 12/1 276 519
I1 11/1 252 477
Totals 23/2 528 996
Based on matrix study 5.
The structures are anticipated to be two and three-story of wood frame and stucco or
similar type construction. Light to moderate foundation loads are anticipated with such
structures. The proposed site layout is shown on the enclosed Plat 1, Enclosure A-2,
within Appendix A.
No grading plans were available for our use during this investigation. However,
observation of the site topography and adjacent properties indicates site development
will entail minimal cuts and fills.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The subject site is an irregular shaped parcel of land located north of 4th Street, west
of Milliken Avenue, and south and east of the Empire Lakes Golf Course in the city of
Rancho Cucamonga, California. The topography of the site is generally planar, falling
slightly to the south. At the time of our visit the northern portions of the site were
utilized for the cultivation of grapes. These were in grapevines on 1 O-foot spacings
in north-south and east-west rows. Every 200 feet or so the vineyards were cut by
dirt roads. No structures were noted within the vineyard portion of the site. The far
southern portion of the site appears to have at one time been partially developed with
the construction of a small paved road and the grading of building pads along both
sides of the road. The road enters the far southeast corner of the site then extends
2
LOB GEo,Ec..,e.,G.o.., ..e.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
to the north a short way were it makes a sharp 90 degree turn and continues off the
site. Underground utilities are evident along the road in the form of water hydrants
and utility boxes. The far southern end of the site has been landscaped with grass and
trees along 4th Street. The site is bordered on the west and northwest by the newly
constructed Empire Lakes Golf Course. To the northeast, the site is bordered by
similar vineyards.
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ANALYSIS
To obtain a comprehensive history of previous site usage, a search was conducted for
available aerial photographs of the area on file at the San Bernardino County
Transportation and Flood Control District collection, by a geologist from this firm. The
search reviewed aerial photographs taken of the site and surrounding region in 1938,
1959, 1969, 1971, 1978, 1986, 1991, and 1996.
The aerial photographs reviewed consisted of vertical aerial stereographic photograph
pairs of varying scales. These photographs were viewed using stereoscopes with
magnifications of 2X and 4X for three-dimensional enhancement. Due to the relatively
large photographic scales involved, the analysis and subsequent interpretation of detail
from aerial photographs sometimes requires a degree of subjective judgement. The
degree of certainty on the interpretation of details depends upon such factors as the
scale and the quality of the photograph. However, an analysis of aerial photographs
will reveal the general site history as to the relative use of the land, possible ground
disturbance, activities, etc.
A brief summary of the site and surrounding conditions during the various times, as
reflected in the photographs is given below.
1. 1938, Fliqht No. W-71, Photo Nos. E-2-3, Scale 1"= 1000'.
The quality of this photograph is poor, and no stereo is available, however, during this
time period the entire site is being utilized for agricultural crops. The southwest and
northeast portions of the site contain grape vineyards. These are in narrow east-west
and north-south rows approximately 10 feet or less apart. In the southeast corner
there are groves of some type. These are located in a rectangular block approximately
600 feet by 1200 feet extending 1200 feet west of Milliken Avenue and 600 feet
3
JJJJE)R GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC,
I
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12 I
June 22, 2000
north of 4th Street. A small well and reservoir is noted off site at the northeast corner I
of the groves, off Milliksn Avenue. The site is bounded by 4th Street on the south, a
small two lane dirt road, Milliken Avenue, also dirt, on the east, and similar vineyards I
on the north, west, and also beyond Milliken Avenue and 4th Street.
2. Octoberl6,1959, FliqhtNo. AXL-16W, PhotoNos. 170-171, Scale l- =1667, I
The groves have been removed and the entire site contains vineyards. 4th Street has I
been paved.
3. January 30, 1969, Fliqht No. 293, Photo Nos. 25-26, Scale 1" =2000'. I
The site appears described in the previous photographs. The Ontario 500 Motor I
Speedway is under construction just south of the site across 4th Street.
4. October 8, 1971, Fliqht No. C-186, Photo Nos. 45-46, Scale 1 "= 2000'. I
The site appears as described in the previous photographs. The speedway now I
appears completed. 4th Street has been widened.
5. January 21, 1978, Fliqht No. C-279, Photo Nos. 100-101, Scale 1 "= 2000'. I
The site appears as described in the previous photographs. The southern most of the '
General Dynamics buildings has been constructed approximately 1,000 feet west of I
the site. Cleveland Avenue has been constructed approximately 400 feet west of the
site. I
6. February 25, 1986, Fliqht No. 450, Photo Nos. 97-98, Scale 1"=2000'. i
The south end of the site has been graded. This area is a large rectangular block
approximately 600 feet lay 1200 feet located northeast of 4th Street and Cleveland I'
Avenue. This includes a small street which leads north off 4th Street extends north
approximately 400 feet then turns at a right angle to extend over to Cleveland Avenue.
This street is paved and has been split into 16 or possibly 32 pads. Fills appear I
minimal perhaps mostly <;ut down 1 foot or so, with 3 to 5 feet of cut along the far
northeast corner. The other two General Dynamics buildings are evident. i
4 I
G.o,E,..,c.,G.o..,,.c. I
I
t FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I 7. July 1, 1991, Fi.qht No. 487, Photo Nos. 111-112, Scale 1"=2000'.
i The site and immediate surrounding region appear as described in the previous
photographs, except the speedway is gone.
I 8. May 31, 1996, Fliqht No. 528, Photo Nos. 142-143, Scale 1 "= 2000'.
I The golf course has been constructed adjacent to and west of the site. This has left
a small berm of fill, 5 feet in thickness or less, along the western perimeter.
I SUBSURFACE FIELD INVESTIGATION
I Our subsurface field exploration program was conducted between May 4, 200 and
May 11, 2000 and consisted of drilling 25 exploratory borings with a truck-mounted
CME 55 drill rig equipped with an 8-inch diameter hollow stem auger. The borings
I were drilled to depths ranging from 16.5 feet to 51.5 feet. The approximate locations
of our exploratory borings are presented on the enclosed Plats, Enclosures A-2 and A-
I 3, within Appendix A.
Logs of the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings were
I maintained by a geologist from this firm. Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples
were obtained at a maximum depth interval of 5 feet and returned to the laboratory
in sealed containers for further testing and evaluation. A detailed description of the
I field exploration program and the boring logs are presented in Appendix B.
I LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Selected soil samples obtained during the field investigation were subjected to
I laboratory testing to evaluate their physical and engineering properties. Laboratory
testing included moisture content, dry density, laboratory compaction, direct shear,
I consolidation, sieve analysis, sand equivalent, R-value and soluble sulfate. A detailed
description of the laboratory testing program and the test results are presented in
Appendix C.
I
I
i 5
~[JOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
I
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12 I
June 22, 2000
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS I
Reqiona Geoloqic Conditions 1
The subject site is located near the northern end of a large geomorphic province of
southern California characterized by the presence of numerous, northwestern trending, I
small mountains ranges and intervening plains and valleys, referred to in the geologic
literature as the Peninsular Ranges (Norris and Webb 1988). The Peninsular Ranges I
province abuts to the north against a series of east-west trending mountain ranges,
collectively referred to as the Transverse Ranges. The site lies approximately 9 km
(5.5 miles) south of the base of the San Gabriel Mountains, which make up the center I
portion of the Transverse Ranges. These mountains are composed predominately of
a core of relatively old metamorphic rocks which have been pushed up by thrust I
movement along the Cucamonga fault zone which lies at the southern base of these
mountains. This results from compressional forces as the northern end of the
Peninsular Ranges is being thrust under the San Gabriel Mountains. The relatively I
rapid uplift of these mountains, combined periodic on-shore atmospheric conditions
that drop moderate to large amounts of precipitation, results in a rapid erosion rates.
The erosion of these ranges have deposited a very thick blanket of relatively recent, I
coarse grained alluvial sediments, consisting of boulders, cobbles, gravel, sand, silt and
lessor clays in a series of coalescing alluvial fans which extend out from the I
mountains. These units tend to become finer grained away from the source, with the
large boulder- gravel deposits confined to near the base of the mountains and the silty
sandy units lying towards the far southern end of the basin. '1
No active earthquake faults are known to exist at, or project into the subject site. The I
nearest known active earthquake fault is the Cucamonga fault which is located
approximately 9 km (5.6 miles) to the north. The next closest fault in the region is the
San Jacinto fault which lies approximately 18 km (11 miles) to the north east. '1
Site Geoloqic Conditions I
As mentioned above, the subject site is situated upon a large alluvial fan complex
emanating from the San Gabriel mountains to the north. As the site iS not located near I
the base, but several miles away from the source, the subject site tends to be
underlain by relatively fine grained alluvial materials of silty sand, with some lenses of I
6 I
LOB [
I
I FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I silt, clay, and coarser materials of sand and gravel. The far southern portion of the site
had from 2 to 4 feet of fill material associated with the grading of building pads on this
I portion.
As noted in the exploratory borings the northern portion of the site contains 8 thin
I surficial veneer of silty sand which was loose and had a small portion of organic
material mix in. This layer most likely is resultant from the mixture of wind blown
I sands and silts, along with fill, or possibly topsoil, from the cultivation of the
vineyards. These materials were dry and loose at the surface, becoming damp and
loose at of depth of a few inches. Below the surficial topsoil, typically at a depth of
I I foot or less, alluvial materials composed primarily of silty sand with various amounts
of fine gravel, typically less than 10%, and silt content up to 30%, and some thin
I layers or lenses of poorly graded sand to well graded sand with gravel. In many of the
borings of coarsening of the units was noted at depth ranging from 7 to 15 feet. In
many of the borings at these depths well graded sand with up to 30% grave and some
I cobbles were noted. All of these materials were damp, typically brown to grayish tan,
damp, and were loose near the surface becoming denser with depths.
I In the borings placed along the southern portion of the site fill materials ranging in
depth from 2 to 5 feet were encountered. These were distinguished by there uniform
I moisture and density characteristics and lack of any soil structures or alluvial layering,
such as lenses or thin layers. Underlying these units were alluvial materials as
i described above.
A detailed description of the subsurface soil conditions as encountered within our
I exploratory trenches and borings is presented on the boring logs within Appendix B.
i Groundwater Hydroloqy
Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory borings nor was any
I groundwater seepage observed during our site reconnaissance. The nearest known
groundwater well in relation to the site is located just to the east, along the west side
of Milliken Avenue. According to the Cooperative Groundwater Well Measuring
I program, coordinated by the Western Municipal Water Agency, groundwater in this
well was measured March of 1999 at a depth of 362 feet below the ground surface.
I
i 7
JLiOJ~ GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC,
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12 I
June 22, 2000
Mass Movement I
The site is situated on a relatively flat plan. The occurrence of mass movement I
instabilities, such as rock falls, landslides, or soil creep, are typically not a factor on
such sites.
Faultinq I
There are no known active faults at or projecting into the site. In addition the site is I
not located within an State of California Earthquake Fault Zone, as defined by the
Alquist-Priolo act. I
Therefore, the nearest known active fault in relation to the site is the Cucamonga fault. I
According to page N-32 of the 1997 UBC Maps of known active fault Near Source
zones, the Cucamonga fault is a "A" fault, located approximately 9 km (5.5 miles) to
the southwest. The next nearest fault is the San Jacinto fault, shown as a "B" fault, I
located approximately 18 km (11 miles) to the northeast.
Historical Seismicity I
In order to obtain a general perspective of the historical seismicity of the site and I
surrounding region a search was conducted for seismic events at and around the area
within various radii. This search was conducted utilizing the historical seismic search
program by EPI Software, Inc. This program conducts a search o'f a user selected I
cataloged seismic events database, within a specified radius and selected magnitudes,
and then plots the events onto an overlay map of known faults. For this investigation I
the database of seismic events utilized by the EPI program was obtained from the
Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) available from the Southern California
Earthquake Center, at h__u:P:llWww.scecdc.scec.orq/ftplcataloqslSCSN/. At the time I
of our search the data base contained data from January 1, 1932 through April 28,
2000. I
In our first search the general seismicity of the region was analyzed by selecting an
epicenter map listing all events of magnitude 4.0 and greater, recorded since 1932, I
within a 100 km radius of the site, in accordance with guidelines of the California
Division of Mines and Geology. This map illustrates the regional seismic history of I
8 I
I
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
moderate to large events. As noted on Enclosure A-4, within Appendix A, the site lies
within a relatively quite region lying southwest of the more active region to the
northeast associated with the San Jacinto fault zone. The closest event recorded in
that time period with a magnitude of 4.0 or greater was located approximately 7
kilometers (4-miles) northwest of the site.
In the next map the micro seismicity of the area lying within a 10 km radius of the site
was examined by selecting an epicenter map listing events on the order of 0.0 and
greater since 1975. In addition, only the "A" events, or most accurate events were
selected. Caltech indicates the accuracy of the "A" events to be approximately 1 km.
The results of this search is a map that presents the seismic history around the area
of the site with much greater detail, not permitted on the larger map. The reason for
limiting the events to the last 25 years on the detail map is to enhance the accuracy
of the map. Events recorded prior the mid 1970's are generally considered to be less
accurate due to advancements in technology- As noted on this map, Enclosure A-5,
there is a zone located about 3k m (2 miles) southeast of the site that appears to be
the source of numerous small events which trend to the northeast. While no surface
breaks or faulting have been noted along this trend, this feature is also a source of
groundwater offsets and has tentatively been called the Colton-Rialto fault. The
closest event on this map to the site was a 2.3 magnitude event located .4 km (1 mile)
south of the site.
Secondary Seismic Hazards
Other secondary seismic hazards generally associated with severe ground shaking
during an earthquake include liquefaction, seiches and tsunamis, earthquake induced
flooding, landsliding and rockfalls, and seismic-induced settlement.
Liquefaction. The potential 'for liquefaction generally occurs during strong ground
shaking within fine-grained loose sediments where the groundwater is usually less than
50-feet. As the depth to groundwater is considered to be greater than 50 feet, the
possibility of liquefaction within these units is considered nil.
SeichesFFsunamis. Since the site is not located near any large bodies of water the
potential for a tsunami is considered nil.
9
~j[,~OR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
Floodinq (Water Storaqs Facility Failure). There are no large water storage facilities
located on or near the site which could possibly rupture during in earthquake and
effect the site by flooding.
Seismically-Induced Landslidinq and Rock falls. Since the site is situated on a relatively
flat plain, the potential for seismically induced mass movement is considered nil.
Seismically-Induced Settlement. Settlement generally occurs within areas of loose,
granular soils with relatively low density. While the upper portions of the site is
underlain by such units, the earthwork operations during the development of the site
will mitigated any such loose conditions.
SOILS AND SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA (Uniform Building Code)
Design requirements for structures can be found within Chapter 16 of the 1997
Uniform Building Code (UBC) based on building type, use and/or occupancy. It should
be noted that many residential structures are constructed in accordance with the
conventional light-framing requirements specified in Chapter 23 of the code which are
deemed to already meet 'the requirements of Chapter 16. However the classification
of use and occupancy of all proposed structures at the site, and thus design
requirements, shall be the responsibility of the structural engineer and the building
official. For structures at the site to be designed in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 16, the subject site specific soils and seismic criteria are provided in the
following sections.
UBC Divisions IV; Earthquake Desiqn Criteria Selection
Procedure and limitations for the earthquake design of applicable structures can be
obtained from Division IV of Chapter 16 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC).
However, it should be noted that the building code requires the minimum design to
allow a structure to remain standing after a seismic event, in order to allow for safe
evacuation. As stated in section 1626.1, "The purpose of the earthquake provisions
herein is primarily to safeguard against major structural failures and loss of life, not to
limit damage or maintain function." Therefore a structure built to UBC code may still
sustain damage which might ultimately result in the demolishing of the structure.
10
LOR ..c.
I
I FF Development, LoP. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I The UBC Division IV requires that all sites, unless exempted, be assigned a soil profile
type and a regional seismic zone. The criteria for the selection of a site soil profile can
I be found in the 1997 UBC Division V, discussed in later sections.
Seismic Zone As shown on Figure 16-2 within Chapter 16 of the 1997 UBC,
I the site is located in seismic zone 4. Section 1629.4.2 of the 1997 UBC directs that
all sites in Seismic Zone 4, unless exempted, shall have a near source factor
I determined.
Near Source Factor. Near source factors are determined based on the distance
I to the nearest type A, or B seismic source (earthquake fault). Once these are
determined near source values can be obtained, dependent on structure type, from
I tables 16-S or 16-T within the 1997 UBC. Seismic source types are classified as A,
B, or C, based on description, maximum anticipated magnitude, and slip rate. Type
C sources are not considered as they do not increase the standard near source factor
I value of 1.0. The following table lists the seismic source type requirements.
I Table 16-U Seismic Source Type~
Seismic Source ~ Seismic Source Description Seismic Source Definitions
I Type Maximum Magnitude Slip Rate(mm/yr)
A Faults capable of large magnitude M27.0 SR 25
I events, and have a high rate of
seismic activity.
B All faults other than A and C. M ~ 7.0 S R < 5
I M <7.0 SR >5
M ~:6.5 SR <2
I C Faults that are not capable of M < 6.5 SR _< 2
producing large magnitude
earthquakes and that have a
relatively low rate of seismic activity.
I1Source 1997 UBC
Specific parameters for earthquake faults within the state of California can be obtained
I form the State of California Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 96-08
(DMG 1996). As noted in our Faultinq section of this report, the nearest known active
I fault in relation to the site, is the Cucamonga fault, located approximately 9 km (5.5
I 11
~JJIOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
miles) to the north. According to the DMG Open File Report 96-08 the Cucamonga
fault has a slip rate of 5 ram/year, and an estimated magnitude event of 7. According
to the UBC table above, this portion of the fault is therefore classified as a type A
fault. The nearest known "B" classification fault is the San Jacinto fault located
approximately 18 km (11 miles) northeast of the site. According to the DMG OFR
96-08 the San Jacinto fault has a slip rate of 12 mm/yr and an anticipate magnitude
of 6.7 and is therefore a type "B" fault.
UBC Division V; Soil Profile
As noted in our excavations at the site the subject site is underlain by a soil profile
type of SD.
UBC Earthquake Desiqn Summary
As determined in the previous sections, the following earthquake design criteria have
been formulated for the site. However, these values should be reviewed and the final
design should be preforrned by a qualified structural engineer familiar with the region.
Seismic and Soil Criteria
Distance to A Distance to B Regional Soil Near
source {km) source (km) Seismic Zone Profile Source
Type Factor N~
9.0 18.0 4 SD 1.2
*Distances rounded to nearest 0.5 km
CONCLUSIONS
General
This investigation provides a broad overview of the geotechnical and geologic factors
which are expected to influence future site planning and development. On the basis
of our field investigation and testing program, it is the opinion of LOR Geotechnical
Group, Inc. that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint,
12
LOR GEoTEc..,c.,G.o.., ,.o.
I
I FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into design
and implemented during grading and construction.
I The subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings are indicative of the
locations explored. The subsurface conditions presented here are not to be construed
I as being present the same everywhere on the site. If conditions are encountered
during the construction of the project which differ significantly from those presented
I in this report. This firm should be notified immediately so we may assess the impact
to the recommendations provided.
I _Foundation
I Based upon the field investigation and test data, it is our opinion that the upper native
soils and existing fills will not, in their present condition, provide uniform and/or
adequate support for the proposed structures. In-place density and Standard
I Penetration Test (SPT) data indicated variable in-situ conditions of the upper native and
fill soils, ranging from loose to medium dense states. These conditions may cause
unacceptable differential and/or overall settlements upon application of the anticipated
I foundation loads.
I To provide adequate support for the proposed apartment structures, we recommend
a compacted fill mat be constructed beneath footings and slabs. This compacted fill
mat will provide a dense, high-strength soil layer to uniformly distribute the anticipated
I foundation loads over the underlying soils. In addition, the construction of this
compacted fill mat will allow for the removal of existing old fill material, and
I recompaction of existing upper disturbed soils within building pad areas.
Conventional spread foundations, either individual spread footings and/or continuous
I wall footings, will provide adequatesupport for the anticipated downward and lateral
loads when utilized in conjunction with the recommended fill mat.
I Geolo~ations
I No special mitigation methods are deemed necessary at this time, other than the
geotechnical recommendations provided in the following sections.
I
i 13
~[.jO~i, GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
Seismicity
Seismic ground rupture is generally considered most likely to occur along pre-existing
active faults. Since no known faults are known to exist at, or project into the site, the
probability of ground surface rupture occurring at the site is considered nil.
Due to the site's close proximity to the Cucamonga fault, it is reasonable to expect a
strong ground motion seismic event to occur during the lifetime of the proposed
development on the site. Large earthquakes could occur on other faults in the general
area, but because of their lesser anticipated magnitude and/or greater distance, they
are considered less significant than the Cucamonga fault zone from a ground motion
standpoint.
The effects of ground shaking anticipated at the subject site, should be mitigated by
the seismic design requirements and procedures outlined in Chapter 16 of the Uniform
Building Code. However it should be noted that the current building code requires the
minimum design to allow a structure to remain standing after a seismic event, in order
to allow for safe evacuation. A structure built to code may still sustain damage which
might ultimately result in the demolishing of the structure (Larson and Slosson 1992).
RECOMMENDATIONS
General Site Grading
It is imperative that no clearing and/or grading operations be performed without the
presence of a qualified geotechnical engineer. An on-site, pre-job meeting with the
owner/developer, the contractor and soil engineer should occur prior to all grading
related operations. Operations undertaken at the site without the geotechnical
engineer present may result in exclusions of affected areas from the final compaction
report for the project.
Grading of the subject site should be performed in accordance with the following
recommendations as well as applicable portions of Appendix Chapter 33 of the
Uniform Building Code, and/or applicable local ordinances.
14
LOR ,.c.
!
I FF Development, UP. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I All areas to be graded should be stripped of significant vegetation and other deleterious
materials.
I All existing uncontrolled fills encountered during site preparation should be completely
removed, cleaned of significant deleterious materials, and may be reused as compacted
I
I It is our recommendation that all existing uncontrolled and/or undocumented fills under
any proposed flatwork and paved areas be removed and replaced with engineered
compacted fill. If this is not done, premature structural distress (settlement) of the
I flatwork and pavement may occur. However, the cost of complete fill removal should
be compared to possible higher maintenance costs if only partial removal and
recompaction is done. It is our opinion that decreased settlement will result from
I increasing the amount of existing fill removed. An economic analysis of the
relationship between current construction costs and ongoing maintenance costs should
I be undertaken to evaluate the most cost effective amount of fill to be removed.
Cavities created by removal of subsurface obstructions should be thoroughly cleaned
I of loose soil, organic matter and other deleterious materials, shaped to provide access
for construction equipment, and backfilled as recommended in the following
I Enqineered Compacted Fill section of this report.
Initial Site Preparation
I
All existing fill and loose, compressible alluvial material should be removed from areas
I to receive engineered compacted fill. The data developed during this investigation
indicates that removals on the order of 2 to 5 feet will be required from the anticipated
fill areas. The actual depths of removal should be verified during the grading operation
I by observation and in-place density testing.
I Preparation of Fill Areas
Prior to placing fill, after the removal of existing fill and any loose alluvial materials, the
I surfaces of all areas to receive fill should be scarified to a depth of at least 6-inches.
The scarified soil should be brought to near optimum moisture content and
i recompacted to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent (ASTM D 1557).
i 15
jE, OR
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
Preparation of Foundation Areas
All footings should rest upon at least 24 inches of properly compacted fill material.
In areas where the required thickness is not accomplished by site rough grading, the
footing areas should be further subexcavated to a depth of at least 24 inches below
the proposed footing base grade, with the subexcavation extending at least five feet
beyond the footing lines. The bottom of this excavation should then be scarified to
a depth of at least 6 inches, brought to near optimum moisture content, and
recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D 1557) prior to
refilling the excavation to grade as properly compacted fill.
Enqineered Compacted Fill
The on-site soils should provide adequate quality fill material, provided they are free
from organic matter and other deleterious materials. Unless approved by the
geotechnical engineer, rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension
greater than six inches should not be buried or placed in fills.
Import fill should be inorganic, non-expansive granular soils free from rocks or lumps
greater than six inches in maximum dimension. Sources for import fill should be
approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to their use.
Fill should be spread in maximum eight inch loose lifts, each lift brought to near
optimum moisture content, and compacted to a relative compacti0n of at least 90
percent in accordance with ASTM D 1557.
Based upon the relative compaction of the near surface soils determined during this
investigation and the relative compaction anticipated for compacted fill soil, we
estimate a compaction shrinkage of approximately 10 to 15 percent. Therefore, 1.10
cubic yards to 1.15 cubic: yards of in-place materials would be necessary to yield one
cubic yard of properly compacted fill material. In addition, we would anticipate
subsidence of approximately 0.20 feet. These values are for estimating purposes only,
and are exclusive of losses due to stripping or the removal of subsurface obstructions.
These values may vary d~e to differing conditions within the project boundaries and
the limitations of this investigation. Shrinkage (bulking) should be monitored during
16
LOR ,.c.
!
I FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I construction. If percentages vary, provisions should be made to revise final grades or
adjust quantities of borrow or export.
I Short Term Excavations
i Following the California Occupational and Safety Health Act (CAL-OSHA)
requirements, excavations deeper than five feet should be sloped or shored. All
excavations and shoring should conform to CAL-OSHA requirements.
Short term excavation greater than 5-feet deep shall conform to Title 8 of the
I California Code of Regulations, Construction Safety Orders, Section 1504 and 1539
through 1547. Based on our exploratory trenches/borings it appears that type C soils
are the predominant type of soil on the project and all short term excavation should be
I based on this type of soil. Deviation from the standard short term slopes are permitted
using option 4, Design by a Registered Professional Engineer (Section 1541.1 ).
I The materials encountered during this investigation were granular and considered to
have a very low expansion potential. Therefore, specialized construction procedures
I to specifically resist expansive soil activity are not anticipated at this time. In order
to verify this, additional evaluation of on-site and imported soils for their expansion
i potential should be conducted following completion of the grading operation.
_Foundatio~
I If the site is prepared as recommended, the proposed apartment structures may be
safely founded on conventional spread foundations, either individual spread footings
I and/or continuous wall footings, bearing either on a minimum of 24 inches of
engineered compacted fill. All foundations should have a minimum width of 12 inches
I and should be established a minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade.
For the minimum width and depth, footings may be designed using a maximum soil
I bearing pressure of 1800 pounds per square foot (psf) for dead plus live loads.
Footings at least 15 inches wide, placed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent
i final grade, may be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2100 (psf) for
i 17
~J. jOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
dead plus live loads. This 15 inch wide by 18 inch deep footing acceptable for a three
story structure where the foundation supports two floors and a roof.
The recommended pressures apply for the total of dead plus frequently applied live
loads, and incorporate a factor of safety of at least 3.0. The allowable bearing
pressures may be increased by one-third for temporary wind or seismic loading. The
resultant of the combined vertical and lateral seismic loads should act within the
middle one-third of the footing width. The maximum calculated edge pressure under
the toe of foundations subjected to eccentric loads or overturning should not exceed
the increased allowable pressure.
Resistance to lateral loads will be provided by passive earth pressure and base friction.
For footings bearing against compacted fill, passive earth pressure may be considered
to be developed at a rate of 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. Base
friction may be computsd at 0.35 times the normal load. Base friction and passive
earth pressure may be combined without reduction. These values are for dead load
plus live load and may be increased by 1/3 for wind or seismic.
Settlement
Total settlement of individual foundations will vary depending on the width of the
foundation and the actual load supported. Maximum settlement of shallow
foundations designed and constructed in accordance with the preceding
recommendations are sstimated to be on the order of 0.5 inch. Differential
settlements between adjacent footings should be about one-half of the total
settlement. Settlement of all foundations is expected to occur rapidly, primarily as a
result of elastic compression of supporting soils as the loads are applied, and should
be essentially completed shortly after initial application of the loads.
Slabs-On-Grade
To provide adequate support, concrete slabs-an-grade should bear on a minimum of
12 inches of compacteel soil. The final pad surfaces should be rolled to provide
smooth, dense surfaces upon which to place the concrete.
18
LOR
I
I FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I Slabs to receive moisture-sensitive coverings should be provided with a moisture vapor
barrier. This barrier may consist of an impermeable membrane. Two inches of sand
I over the membrane will reduce punctures and aid in obtaining a satisfactory concrete
cure. The sand should be moistened just prior to placing of concrete.
I The slabs should be protected from rapid and excessive moisture loss which could
result in slab curling. Careful attention should be given to slab curing procedures, as
I the site area is subject to large temperature extremes, humidity, and strong winds.
Wall Pressures
I
The design of footings for retaining structures should be performed in accordance with
the recommendations described earlier under Preparation of Foundation Areas and
I Foundati~. For design of retaining wall footings, the resultant of the applied
loads should act in the middle one-third of the footing, and the maximum edge
I pressure should not exceed the basic allowable value without increase.
For design of retaining walls unrestrained against movement at the top, we
I recommend an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) be used.
This assumes level backfill consisting of recompacted native soils placed against the
I structures and within the back cut slope extending upward from the base of the stem
at 35 degrees from the vertical or flatter.
I Walls below grade that are restrained against free movement at the top of the walls
and that have level backfill should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure
I between active and at-rest conditions. For this condition, we recommend an
equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf be used if recompacted native soil is used for
backfill.
I
To avoid over stressing or excessive tilting during placement of backfill behind walls,
I heavy compaction equipment should not be allowed within the zone delineated by a
45 degree line extending from the base of the wall to the fill surface. The backfill
directly behind the walls should be compacted using light equipment such as hand
I operated vibrating plates and rollers. No material larger than three inches in diameter
should be placed in direct contact with the wall.
I
i 19
Ij[.JOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
Wall pressures should be verified prier to construction, when the actual backfill
materials and conditions have been determined. Recommended pressures are
applicable only to level, properly drained backfill with no additional surcharge loadings.
If inclined backfills are proposed, this firm should be contacted to develop appropriate
active earth pressure parameters. Toe bearing pressure for non-structural walls on
soils, not prepared as described earlier under Preparation of Foundation Areas, should
not exceed Uniform Building Code values, (UBC Table 18-1-A).
Preliminary Pavement Desiqn
Testing and design for preliminary on-site pavement was conducted in accordance with
the California Highway Design Manual. Based upon our preliminary sampling and
testing, and upon Traffic Indices generally used for residential paving, it appears that
the structural sections tabulated below should provide satisfactory pavements for the
subject apartment complex:
AREA T,I. PRELIMINARY SECTION
Light Vehicle Drive and Parking 5.0 0.25'AC/0.35'AB
AC - Asphalt Concrete
AB - Class 2 Aggregate Base
The above structural sections are predicated upon 90 percent relative compaction
(ASTM 1557) of all utility trench backfills and 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM
1557) of the upper 12 inches of street subgrade soils and of any aggregate base
utilized. In addition, the aggregate base should meet Caltrans specifications for Class
2 Aggregate Base.
In areas of the pavement which will receive high abrasion loads due to start-ups and
stops, or where trucks will move on a tight turning radius, consideration should be
given to installing concrete pads. Such pads should be a minimum of 0.5 foot thick
concrete. Concrete pads are also recommended in areas adjacent to trash storage
areas where heavier loads will occur due to operation of trucks lifting trash dumpsters.
20
LOR ,.c.
I
I FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
I The above pavement designs were based upon the results of preliminary sampling and
testing, and should be verified by additional sampling. and testing when the actual
i subgrade soils are exposed.
Sulfate Protection
I
The results of the sulfate tests conducted on selected subgrade soils expected to be
encountered at foundation levels are presented in Appendix C.
Based on the test results the Cement Industry Committee of California, recommends
I Type I or II cement be used for concrete elements in contact with such materials.
i Construction Mon torin.q
Post investigative services are an important and necessary continuation of this
I investigation. Project plans and specifications should be reviewed prior to construction
to confirm that the intent of the recommendations presented herein have been
incorporated into the design. Additional expansion testing and testing for on-site
I (street) pavement design should be performed after the site is rough graded.
I During construction, sufficient and timely geotechnical observation and testing should
be provided to correlate the findings of this investigation with the actual subsurface
conditions exposed during construction. Items requiring observation and testing
I include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:
I 1. Site preparation-stripping and removals.
2. Excavations, including approval of the bottom of excavation prior to backfilling.
I
3. Scarifying and recompacting prior to fill placement.
I 4. Subgrade preparation for pavements and slabs-on-grade.
I 5. Placement of engineered compacted fill and backfill, including approval of fill
materials and the performance of sufficient density tests to evaluate the degree
i of compaction being achieved.
21
IIJOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
June 22, 2000
LIMITATIONS
This report contains geetechnical conclusions and recommendations developed solely
for use by FF Development, L.P., and their design consultants, for the purposes
described earlier. It may not contain sufficient information for other uses or the
purposes of other parties. The contents should not be extrapolated to other areas or
used for other facilities without consulting LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc.
The recommendations are based on interpretations of the subsurface conditions
concluded from information gained from subsurface explorations, and a surficial site
reconnaissance. The interpretations may differ from actual subsurface conditions,
which can vary horizontally and vertically across the site. Due to possible subsurface
variations, all aspects of field construction addressed in this report should be observed
and tested by the project geotechnical consultant.
If parties other than LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. provide construction monitoring
services, they must be notified that they will be required to assume responsibility for
the geotechnical phase of the project being completed by concurring with the
recommendations provided in this report or by providing alternative recommendations.
The report was prepared using generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices
under the direction of a state licensed geotechnical engineer. No warranty, express
or implied, is made as to conclusions and professional advice included in this report.
Any persons using this report for bidding or construction purposes should perform such
independent investigations as deemed necessary to satisfy themselves as to the
surface and subsurface conditions to be encountered and the procedures to be used
in the performance of work on this project.
22
LOR
FF Development, L.P. Project No. 60631.12
O0
June 22, 2 0
CLOSUR______~E
It has been a pleasure to assist you with this project. We look forward to being of
further assistance to you as construction begins. Should conditions be encountered
during construction that appear to be different than indicated by this report, please
contact this office immediately in order that we might evaluate their effect.
Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc.
No. 1893
CERTIFIED
Engineering Geologist ENGINEERING.
GE 2030
, ~' ,~.:-T~,,.~C..~.:.~-
23
~O~ GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
I
I REFERENCES
I Blake, T.F., 1989, EQSEARCH, A computer program for the estimation of peak
horizontal acceleration from southern California historical earthquake catalog, ver. 2.01
i (updates through 1996).
Blake, T.F., 1989, EQFAULT, A computer program for the deterministic prediction of
I peak horizontal acceleration from digitized California faults, ver. 2.01.
I Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumal T.E., 1993, Estimation of response spectra and
peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: An Interim Report,
U.S.G.S. Open File Report 93-509.
California Division of Mines & Geology (CDMG), 1997, Guidelines for evaluation and
I mitigation seismic hazards in California, Special Publication 117.
I California Division of Mines & Geology (CDMG), 1986, Guidelines to geologic/seismic
reports, Note No. 42.
I California Division of Mines & Geology (CDMG), 1975, Recommended guidelines for
determining the maximum credible and the maximum probable earthquakes. Note No.
I 43.
I Hart, E.W., 1994 :Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California: CDMG Special Publication
42.
I International Conference of Building Officials, 1994, Uniform Building Code, 1994
edition.
I I
Larson, R., and Slosson, J., 1992, The role of seismic hazard evaluation in engineering
I reports, in engineering geology practice in southern California, AEG Special Publication
; Number 4, ppl 91-194.
I Reeder, W., 1997, Earthquake Plotting Program, EPI Software.
I
I
IIJOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
J APPENDIX A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~J_jC)I~E~k, GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC.
INDEX MAP
PROJECT: PALMER GOLF COURSE APARTMENTS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA PROJECT NO: 60631.12
CLIENT: FF DEVELOPMENT, LP. ENCLOSURE: A-1
LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc.
SCALE: AS SHOWN
T HE CITY OF
I~ANCIIO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: May 2, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15174 - KB
HOME - The proposed subdivision of 33.13 acres of land into 181 lots for
single-family homes and 4 lettered lots for trail and landscaping purposes, in the
Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium
Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) at an actual project density of
5.46 dwelling units per acre, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and
RochesterAvenue-APN: 227-151-52.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed project is 5.46 dwelling units per acre. The project site is split between the
Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and the Medium Residential District
(8-14 dwelling units per acre); however, the project is within the Low-Medium density of the Terra
Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Term Vista Community Plan subject to review
and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The standards of the Low-Medium
District shall apply to the proposed project.
ANALYSIS:
The attached Planning Commission staff report provides a detailed analysis of the proposed project.
The site was originally mass-graded in 1984 with annual weed control since that time; therefore,
there are no remaining trees or significant vegetation on the site. The Rochester Avenue and """
Church Street are have been improved; however, Malaga Drive is improved only along the rear of
The Home Depot. Development of the project will require completion of street improvements along
the tract boundary.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SUBTT15174- KB HOME
May 2, 2001
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The Environmental Checklist Form Initial Study Part II has been prepared for the project. Mitigation
Measures have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval pertaining to short-term air
quality impacts and noise impacts on future residents abutting Rochester Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DM:mlg
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 11,2001
Resolution of Approval
2/'/
THE CITY OF
I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: April 11,2001
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15174 -
KB HOME - The proposed subdivision of 33.13 acres of land into 181 lots for single-
family homes, and 4 lettered lots for trail and landscaping purposes, in the Low-
Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential
District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) at an actual project density of 5.46 dwelling
units per acre, located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Rochester
Avenue - APN 227-151-52.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. project Density: The proposed project is 5.46 dwelling units per .acre. The project site is split
between the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and the Medium
Residential Distdct (8-14 dwelling units per acre); however, the project is proposed within the
Low-Medium standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP). This flexibility is allowed
in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission
and City Council. The standards of the Low-Medium District shall apply to the proposed
project.
B. SUrroundinq Land Use and Zoninfi:
North Village of Independence/TVCP - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre); and vacant land/TVCP - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre).
South - Home Depot/TVCP - Community Commercial; vacant landFI'VCP - Medium-High
Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre).
East Single-family residential - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre).
West - Vacant Land/TVCP - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), and High
Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre),
TEM D . ,15
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 15174 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES, INC.
April 11,2001
Page 2
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre).
North Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre),
South- CommunitY Commercial/Medium-High Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre).
East Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre).
West Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre).
D. Site Characteristics: The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately 2 percent
gradient. The site is void of unique features or significant vegetation. Tentative Tract 15174 is
a subdivision of Parcel I of Parcel Map 15454, which was approved by the Planning
Commission in April 2000, located in the southeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Community
Plan. Surrounding land uses include the Village of Independence to the north, Home Depot to
the south, the single-family neighborhood commonly referred to as the Rochester Tract to the
east, and vacant land to the west.
The perimeter of the Tentative Tract is bound by Church Street along the northwest boundary
(existing improvements include cu rb/gutter and streetlights), Rochester Avenue forms the east
boundary (existing improvements also include curb/gutter and streetlights), and Malaga Drive
along the southwest boundary (existing improvements are complete only along the extent of
the Home Depot development),
ANALYSIS:
A. General: Tentative Tract 15174 contains 181 lots, with a minimum lot area of 5,000 square
feet, intended for future development of single-family homes. Lot sizes within the tract range
from the minimum 5,000 square feet to over 11,000 square feet. Because of the liberal
introduction of knuckles and cul-de-sacs within the tract, many of the lots are in the range of
5,500 to 7,000 square feet.
The Terra Vista Community Plan identifies a Trail Type "D" that traverses the parcel, which is
incorporated in the map design. Four lettered lots are included for trail and open space
purposes. Access to the trail from within the tract is provided from the ends of the cul-de-sacs
and knuckles. The trail provides access northerly to Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway,
and southerly to Malaga Drive.
Within walking distance to the tract is Terra Vista Elementary School and Mountain View Park,
located northerly of the site along Terre Vista Parkway. The trail and open space dedications
made within this tract will cumulatively be added to the requirements for Park Implementation
upon completion.
B. Desi.qn Review Committee: The Committee members (Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, and Larry
Henderson) reviewed the project on March 8, 2001, and recommended approval of the project
subject to modification to the Trail Type "D" that traverses the project. The corresponding
Conditions of Approval have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval.
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on
March 7, 2001, and recommended approval with the Standard Conditions of Approval along
with conditions included in the attached Resolution of Approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 15174
April 11,2001
Page 3
D. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study has been prepared for the project. Mitigation has
been included in the attached Resolution pertaining to short-term air quality impacts and noise
impacts on future residents abutting Rochester Avenue.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a
300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and adoption of the Resolution
recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 15174, subject to all Conditions of Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buffer
City Planner
BB:DM/jc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "C" - Design Review Committee Minutes
Exhibit "D" - Initial Study
Resolution of Approval
PROJECT
SITE
'~i . iI
VICINITY MAP
T~NTATPVE TRACT
/2///// ......
/
//
~ / ~]
/ '; ..... U
~/
/
/ z---~-r-~ ......
.~,, .~ "W 'r~:x~/TATIVE TRACT N0. 15174
e ~ ~ ~ 0]~ SAN B~NA~(O, STATE 0Y CALI~O~LL
TYPICAL,~SECTION TYPICAL=,S, ECTION
TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 15174
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Debra Meier March 6, 2001
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15174 - KAUFMAN AND BROAD
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. - The proposed subdivision of 33.13 acres of land into 181
for single-family homes and 4 lettered lots for trail and landscaping purposes, in the Low-Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) at an actual project density of 5.46 dwelling units per acre, located at the southwest corner
of Church Street and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-52.
Desiqn Parameters: This parcel is designated Low-Medium Residential and Medium Residential of
ihe Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP). The net density of the proposed project is 5.46 dwelling
units per acre, which is in the Low-Medium density range of the Community Plan. Flexibility is
allowed in the TVCP to allow development within one range, either higher or lower than the
designated density, subject to approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The
standards of the Low-Medium Residential district will apply to the proposed development.
The perimeter of the Tentative Tract is bound by Church Street to the north, Rochester Avenue to
the east, and Malaga Drive along the south boundary. Church Street and Rochester Avenue are
parHally improved (curb, gutter, and pavement), however, Malaga Drive is improved only as far as
the rearof The Home Depot. The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately2 percent
gradient. The site is void of unique features and significant vegetation.
Tentative Tract 1 5174 is located in the southeast quadrant of the Tetra Vista Community Plan.
Surrounding land uses include the Village of Independence (Low-Medium Residential) and a vacant
parcel designated Medium Residential, both on the north side of Church Street; existing single-
family residential east of Rochester Avenue (a.k.a. the Rochester Tract); The Home Depot and a
vacant parcel (designated Medium-High Residential) are both located south of Malaga Drive.
The Tentative Tract is designed with a minimum 5,000 square foot lot size. The Terra Vista Trail
Type "D" traverses the site, from the intersection of Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway, through
the site to Malaga Drive, joining the Type "E" trail on the north side of Malaga Drive. The Tract
design incorporates a series of cul-de-sacs that open at the ends to allow access from with in the
neighborhood to the trail system.
Staff Comments~: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
1. Expand the trail between lots 109 and 162. One possible approach is to angle in the lot line
along the west line of lot 109 (see attached sketch).
2. The continuation of the trail from within the tract will extend along the east side of both "A"
Street (on the north) and "H" Street (on the south), Therefore, the sidewalk, along the that
portion of the streetscape should be 6-feet in width, and if the length of the block permits,
meander the walkway.
3. The trail pathway should meander within the landscaped area as feasible.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval subject to satisfactory resolution of issues
pertaining to the trail.
,iVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
c, o, Ra=ac=amo.ga (Part I - Initial Study)
Planning Division
(909) 477-2750
The purpose of this fo~ is to info~ the Ci~ of ~e basic componen~ of the proposed
project so that the Ci~ may review the project pu~uant to Ci~ policies, o~dinances, and
guidelines; the California EnvironmenDI Quali~ Act; and the Ci~'s Rules and Procedures
to Implement CE~. It is impo~nt that the info~ation requested in this application be
provided in full. ~
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE pROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City ~taff will not be available to perform won~ required to provide missing
information.
Appilcation Number for the preject to which this form Pertains: Tentative Tract No. 15174
Project Title:
Name&Addressofpmjectowner(s): Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Ihc.
801 Corporate Center Dr. ,' Suite 201
Pomona, CA 91768-2641
.Name&AddressofdeveloperorpmjectsPonson Same as above
Contact Person & Address: Mr. Jary Cockroft
TelephoneNumben (909) 802-1133
Name & Address of pemon prepaHng ~ ~rm ~ diffemnt fmm above: Mark Bertone
c/o Madole & Associates, Inc.
10601 Church St., Suite 107
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
TelephoneNumben (909) 948-1311
Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-I/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the
site boundaries.
Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
2) '
views into and from the site from the primary access points which seNe the site; and representative views of significant
features"'Trom the site. Include a reap showing location of each photograph.
3) Project Location (describe):
Located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Church Street.
4) Assessors Pamel Numbera (attach additional sheet if necessary): APN 227 - 151-52
'5) Gross Site Area (ao/sq. ft.): 38.53 ac
· 6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 23.35 ac
7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet
if necessary:
N/A
Include a description of all pen'nits which will be necessary from the Ci~ of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental
agencies in o~er to ~lly implement the project:
1) Tentative Tract Map approval 2) Design review approval
3) Grading permits 4) Buildinq permits
Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including infomlation on topography, soil stability, plants
9)
and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage coumes, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site
(including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,
site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheological surveys, traffic studies):
This 3-sided site made up of approximately 33 acres is bounded to the north and
east, and partially to the south by existing improved roadways- There is a
,qentle 2% slope of the land from north to south without any significant changes
in grade. The soil is made up of coarse sand, gravel and cobbles. The site i~
covered with scrub vegetation and native grasses and does not have any trees
within its boundary.
1 O) Describe the known cultural and/orhistorical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and
oral histoO'):
No known cultural or historical elements have occurred on this site.
11) Describeanynoisesouroesandtheirlevelsthatnowaffectthesite(airoraft' roadwaynoise, etc.)andhowtheywfllaffect
proposed uses:
Measurable levels of roadway noise are present along existing perimeter roadways.
Construction of sound attenuating perimeter block walls will mitigate the affect
of existing roadway noise to adjacent homes built within this project.
INITSTD1 .WPD- 4~96' ~ ~.~, Page 3
Describe the proposed project ~ deter. Th~ should provide an adequate description of ~e site ~ terms of ultimate use which
wifi msult fmm the prosed project. indicate if there are proposed phases for develoPment, the extent of development to occur
with each phase, and the anfic~a~d completion of each ~crement. A~ach additional sheet(s) if necess8~:
The project consists of 180 single famil~ residential lots. Internal local streets
will be a minimum of sixty feet wide with sidewalds on each side within 12.00 f~et
wide landscaped parkways. The local streets will provide access at two locatio-s
to Church Street, one location at RochRster Avenue and one location at Malaga
Drive. A continuation of the type "~D" trail will be extended through the site
from the current termination at Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway to the
existing trail at the intersection of Malaga Drive and Rochester Avenue.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops,
department stores, etc.) end scale of development (height. frontage, setback, rear yard. etc.]:
See attached
14) ~rzll the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the sun'ounding general area of the project?
NO
13)
This project within Terra Vista Planned Community is bounded to the
north and east and partially to the south by existing improved roadways.
To the north is Independence, a gated community with 545 single two
story family homes. To the east is a single family one-story subdivision
and to the south is Terra Vista Promenade, a retail center with Home
Depot. The land to the east is undeveloped at this time and is zoned M,
MH and H.
18) Indicate the type of shorf-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels
affect adjacent properfies and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are PmPosed?
None
'16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees:
Trees of this nature do not exist on this property.
in~cateanybo~esofwater(indud~gdomesfic watersupplies) ~to wh~hthesitedm~s:
This site drains into City of Rancho Cucamonga Master Planned Storm Drain
facilities.
18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cladfication, please contact
the Cucamonga County Water Disttfct at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day) 600 qal/day Peak use (gallDay) 1200 aal/day
b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac)
Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfurlher cla~cation, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distf~ct at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal/day) 270 gal/day
b. Commercial/ind. (gal/day/ac)
RESIDENTIAL pROJECTS:
20) Number of residential units:
Detachec~ (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum l°t size and maximurn l°t size: 180 lots total
5~000 sq. foot minimum
8,577 sq. foot maximum
5,650 sq. foot average
Attached (indicate whether units am rental or for sale units):
21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: N/A - TTM Only
Sale Price(s) $ to $
Rent (per month) $ to $.
22) Specir), number of bedrooms by unit type:
N/A - TTM Only
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type:
N/A - TTM Only
24) Indicate the expected number of school children who w~l be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School
Districts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elementary: 180 x 0.66 = 13.8.80
(K-5) 180 x 0.21 = 37.80
b. Junior High:
(6-8) 172 x 0.20 = 34.40
c. Senior High
(9-12)
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL pROJECTS
25) Descfibetype~fuse(s)andmaj~rfuncti~n(s)~fc~mmemia~~indust~a~~rinstituti~na~uses:
26) Total floor area of commemial, industrial, or institutional uses by type:
27) Indicate hours of operation:
28) Numberof employees: Total: Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
29) Provide breakdown of anticiPatedj~b ~~assi~cati~ns~ inc~uding wage and sa~ary ranges~ as we~~ as an indicati~n ~f the rate
of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
30) Esfirnafion of the number of workers to be hired that currentlY reside in the CitY:
For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be
verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
ALL PROJECTS
32] Havethewater, sewer,~re~and~~~dc~ntr~~agenciesservingthepmjectbeenc~ntactedt~dete~~ninetheirabi~ity~~pr~vide
adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response,
No
In the known histo~7 of this properly, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials?
Examples of haza~:lous and/or toxic materials include. but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and
herbioides; fuels. oils, solvents, and other ftammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above·
Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if
known.
NO
34) Wift the prop~sed project inv~~ve the temp~rery ~r ~~ng-term use~ st~rage ~r discharge ~f hazard~us and/~r t~xic
materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materYals to be
used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shaft be
shown and labeled on the application plans.
NO
I heraby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for
adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and
correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional infon'nation may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Cucamonga.
Date' Nay 2, 2000 Signature: ~/~"' ~' ~
Title' V~ce Pres~ndent-, Land Deve]o men1:
· K ufman a d Broad of 50 California, Inc.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Tentative Tract SUBq'I'15174
2. Description of Project: Tentative Tract SUBTT15174 - KB Home: The proposed
subdivision of 33.13 acres of land into 181 lots for single-family homes and 4 lettered lots
for trail and landscaping purposes, in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) and Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra
Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Church
Street. Proposed development density over the entire project is Low-Medium Density
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) at an actual project density of 5.46 dwelling units per acre.
APN: 227-151-52
3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
KB Home
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Pomona, CA 91768-2641
4. General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre).
5. Zoning: The parcel is presently designated Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre), and Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), of the Terra
Vista Community Plan (TVCP). The net density for the proposed project is 5.46 dwelling
units per acre, which is in the Low-Medium density range of the Community Plan.
Flexibility is allowed in the TVCP to allow development within one range, either higher or
lower, than the designated density, subject to approval of the Planning Commission and
the City Council. The standards of the Low-Medium Residential district will apply to the
proposed development.
6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tentative Tract 15174 is located on Parcel I of
Parcel Map 15454, and is located in the southeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Community
Plan. Surrounding land uses include Village of Independence (Low-Medium Residential),
and a vacant parcel designated Medium Residential located north of Church Street. There
is also existing single-family residential (Low-Medium Residential) east of Rochester
Avenue (a.k.a. The Rochester Tract), the existing Home Depot (Community Commercial),
and a vacant parcel designated Medium-High Residential located south of Malaga Drive
(formerly Poplar Drive).
The site perimeter is bounded largely by improved streets, including Rochester Avenue
along the east boundary and Church Street along the northerly boundary. In addition,
Malaga Drive is improved along a portion of the southerly boundary. The site slopes
gently from north to south at approximately 2 percent gradient. The site is covered with
scrub vegetation, weeds, and grasses. There are no unique features, nor any existing
structures or trees on-site.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
TENTATIVE TRACT 15174 - KB HOME Page 2
7. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
8. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner
(909) 477-2750
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
II) Land Use and Planning (X) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services
Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Population and Housing Energy and Mineral Resources (X) Aesthetics
(X) Geological Problems Hazards (X) Cultural Resources
(X) Water (X) Noise ( ) Recreation
(X) Air Quality (X) Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared:
(x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
Signed: '~'~~
Debra Meier, AICP
Contract Planner
December 26, 2000
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 3
Potenhally
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Unless Than
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an
explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant impact," "Potentially Significant impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a
discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified.
1. LAND USE AND PL.I~NING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( (X)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (X)
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (X)
vicinity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (X)
established community?
Comments:
a-d) The parcel is presently designated Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) and Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the
Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP). The net density for the proposed project is
5.46 dwelling units per acre, which is in the Low-Medium density range of the
Community Plan. Flexibility is allowed in the TVCP to allow development within one
range, either higher or lower, than the designated density, subject to approval of the
Planning Commission and the City Council. The standards of the Low-Medium
Residential district will apply to the proposed development.
2. POPULAtiON AND HOI. ISB~IG. Would the proposak
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () (X)
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly ( ) ( ) (X)
or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () (X)
housing?
Comments..:.
a-c) Construction activities will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the
area. The proposed subdivision will result in new residents to the area; however,
the proposed development has been anticipated since the adoption of the Terra
Vista Community Plan in 1983. The site is void of existing structures, and will
therefore not impact existing units.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 4
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLBvlS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () (X)
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (X)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (X)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) (X
Comments:
a-c) No known earthquake faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo
Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone
along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault passes approximately 2 miles north and
west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles
northerly. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes.
Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is
approximately 10 miles northeast of the site and the San Andteas Fault, capable of
producing Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeast of the site.
Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. The site is located on
stable soils, which are typically not subject to liquefaction. Adherence to the
Uniform Building Code will ensure the geologic impacts are less than significant on
residential construction.
d) The site is not located near a body of water.
e-f) The site has a relatively gentle grade, so landslides or mudflows are not likely to
occur, and grading will be required only to create proper drainage and development
of appropriate building pad areas.
g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga-Delhi soil association. These soils
are typically excessively drained, moderately sloping soil forming on alluvial fans.
They are relatively stable, but are not subject to liquefaction when the water table is
relatively shallow. Prior to issuance of building permits, a soil report will be required
by the Building and Safety Division. The impact is not considered significant.
i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 5
~potentially ~
i sigamcant
issues and Supporting Information Sources: u,~,~.
Mitigation
Incorporat6d
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (X)
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or ether alteration of ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (X)
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () (X)
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( (X)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( (X)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ( ) ( ( ) (X)
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Comments:
a) The project is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage
pattern. The site perimeter is largely bounded by improved streets, including
Rochester.Avenue along the east boundary and Church Street along the northerly
boundary. Also, a portion of Malaga Drive is improved along the southerly
boundary. The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately 2 percent
gradient. A drainage study indicating how storm water will be directed to the
existing storm drains in the immediate area must be approved by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permits.
b) The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain.
c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water.
f-i) The project will have no impact on the direction or course of groundwater, nor will
the project come in contact with groundwater or impact ground water quality.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 6
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnlessThan
s,gn,.=..,M,,,0a.o.,
5. AIR QUALITY, Would the proposah
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-b) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety
Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction,
there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site.
Sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction
vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction
vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. NOx and PM!0 levels may
be exceeded during this phase; however, with the implementation of the following
mitigation measures, impacts will be reduced to less-than-significant levels.
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in
accordance with the SCAQMD Rule 403.
2) Perimeter streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by
the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil
off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25
mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours
or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used
on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The
construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans
include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and
maintained in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.
6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in-lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible.
7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans
include a statement that work crews will shut-off equipment when not in
use.237
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 7
Issues and Supporting information Sources:
c-d)The proposed project is not of the size, scope, or nature to generate emissions that
could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors.
6. TRANSpORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (X) ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ( ) ( ) (X)
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby ( ) (X)
uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (x)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) (X)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) (X)
alternative transportation (e,g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-f) The proposed single-family residential subdivision will generate approximately
1,820 trips per day (an average of 10 trips per day per household). The land use is
consistent with the goals of the Tetra Vista Community Plan, including the required
Master Plan street improvements and related facilities in the immediate area,
including installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Chumh Street and Terra
Vista Parkway. At the time of building permit issuance, the applicant is required to
pay Traffic Impact Fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental
increase in traffic as a result of the project.
g) Located approximately 3-miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is northerly
of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users of aircraft.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (X)
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, () () () (X)
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () () (X)
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal () () () (X)
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for City of Ranch0 Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 8
I Significant
I act
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Comments:
a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native
vegetation was cleared from the site as early as 1984 and annual weed and erosion
control measures have been undertaken since that time.
b-c) Although previously in vineyard cultivation, the site was graded to a super-pad
condition in 1984 when much of Terra Vista was rough graded. There are no
existing trees or structures on the site.
d) There are no wetland habitats on the site.
e) The site is undeveloped; however, development in the vicinity has eliminated any
wildlife corridors that may have traversed the site in the past.
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal.'
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () (X)
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) (X)
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
Comments~
a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy
conservation.
c) The site is not designated by State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City
General Plan, Figure IV-2 and TableIV-1; therefore, there is no impact.
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (X)
hazardous substances (including, but not limited to:
oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (X)
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (X)
brush, grass, or trees?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 9
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: poteniiellyUnless Then
Comments:
a-e) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses other than the prior vineyard
cultivation. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or
discolored soil are observed. There is no indication of underground storage tanks
or illegal dumping, or refuse on the site.
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
Comments:
a-b) The proposed project will not produce any noticeable long-term noise impacts, as
the site is proposed for residential subdivision, which is consistent with development
in the surrounding area. The temporary increase in noise during the construction
period, as well as increased noise as a result of additional trips, is not considered
significant due to the urbanized setting of the project area. A noise study must be
prepared in conjunction with any development application to analyze traffic
impacts along Rochester Avenue and Church Street.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-e) .Fire Protection - The site, located on Church Street at Rochester Avenue, will be
served by a fire station located near Base Line Road east of Day Creek Channel, or
Milliken Avenue near Banyan Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approval of the
Uniform Building and Fire Codes are placed upon project approval.
Police Protection - The proposed residential subdivision will incrementally increase
the need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee schedule adopted by the
City Council.
Schools. - The proposed project is located within the Terra Vista Community, which
has agreements with the affected school districts to fund school construction.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 10
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
Parks - The proposed project is located within the Terra Vista Community, which has
a Paik Implementation Agreement approved by the City Council, through which park
sites are developed for the entire Community Plan area.
Public Facilities/Services - The proposed residential subdivision would incrementally
increase traffic on adjacent streets, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council.
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (X)
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a-g) The proposed residential subdivision will include the construction of 182 single-
family residences. The proposed development will extend as necessary existing
utilities into the site as a condition of development. The proposed project will not
require major modification or alterations to the existing utility infrastructure in the
immediate area.
13. AESTHETICS- Would the proposal.'
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Comments:
a-b) The proposed residential subdivision is located adjacent to Rochester Avenue,
Church Street, and Malaga Drive, and must be developed in conformance with the
landscape and streetscape guidelines of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the
Rochester Avenue Beautification Master Plan. The future residential structures
must receive City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review Committee approval prior
to building permit issuance.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 11
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
c) The proposed project development will increase the number of streetlights and
security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. Because of the nature of the
existing residential and commercial development in the area surrounding the site,
the impacts of lightJglare will not be significant.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposah
a) Disturb paleontological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () () () (X)
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
potential impact area?
Comments:
a-e) Although no cultural resources have been observed during previous grading on the
site and on surrounding parcels, as well as during annual site maintenance,
additional grading on the site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources. As
the site is approximately 33 acres in size, and much of the surrounding area has
previously been developed, the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is
minimal and impacts are, therefore, considered to be less than significant. In the
event that any such resources are discovered, the contractor will be required to
contact the owner of the site and the San Bernardino County Museum for the
proper recovery, removal, or documentation.
15. RECREATION- Would the proposal.'
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a) The proposed residential subdivision of 182 single-family homes will incrementally
increase the use of existing parks within Terra Vista; however, a Park
Implementation Agreement was adopted by the City Council, which sets standards
for park development within Terra Vista.
b) The proposed subdivision is located southerly of the recently completed Mountain
View Park, which is the park nearest to the proposed development. The proposed
project will not negatively impact the use or enjoyment of any of the existing parks
in Terra Vista or the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 12
Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Tnlln
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-
term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term
impacts will endure well into the future.)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () () (X)
are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (X)
environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Comments..;.
a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native
vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984. At this time, the vineyard was
removed and the site was graded to a "superpad" condition. Annual erosion and
weed control measures have been undertaken since that time. There are no
existing trees or structures remaining on the site.
b) The project site is approximately 33 acres in size, and grading will entail
establishing proper drainage and residential building pads suitable for future single-
family development. Although the short-term construction activities may result in
dust and noise which may be noticeable to existing residents in the immediate area,
significant impacts are avoided through implementation of erosion control and dust
suppression measures identified in Section 5.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Tentative Tract 15174 Page 13
Potentially
Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially UnlessThan
c) The proposed project does not have impacts that are individually limited or
cumulatively considerable. The site is within the Tetra Vista Community Plan,
which permits residential density in the range proposed by Tentative Tract 15492.
The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that could not be mitigated through the
City's Standard Conditions of Approval.
d) The proposed development on 33 acres would not cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The site is located on a Low-
Medium and Medium Density Residential parcel along Rochester Avenue at Church
Street.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within
the scope of. and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study
and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500
Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(X) General Plan EIR
(Cerlified April 6, 1981 )
(X)Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update
(SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989)
(X) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR
(SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983)
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I
have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid
the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects
would occur.
Signature: ~ ~ Date: ~,/'~,////D /
Print NAVY/'/z~''~'~ ~'=:~"~"'
D3O
City of Rancho Cucamonga
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.: Tentative Tract SUBTT15174 Public Review Period Closes: April 11,2001
Project Name: Project Applicant: KB Home
Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of Church Street and
Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-52.
Project Description: The proposed subdivision of 33.13 acres of land into 181 lots for single-family homes
and 4 lettered lots for trail and landscaping purposes, in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) and Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) at an actual project density of
5.46 dwelling units per acre.
FINDING
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
[] The initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a
significant effect on the environment.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period.
May 2, 2001
Date of Determination Adopted By
fq5
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15174
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action
and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of
approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
pianner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly,
and that proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of
the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucemonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultant's fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,
and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting
documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority
for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following
address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TENTATIVE TRACT 15174 - KB HOME
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff is needed,
as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific
mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or
additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible
City department, and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational
personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after
written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also
has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure
attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the
authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion, shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The
Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of
guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or
pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period
of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site, and report the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identity the reporter as an individual qualified to know
whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting
plan shall conform to the Citys MMP, and shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
2q7
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15174 Applicant: Kaufman & Broad of Southern California
Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meier, AICP Date: December 26, 2000
Noise
A Noise Impact Study will be required in conjunction with the CP At time of D 2
Development
Devetupment/Design Review application to analyze traffic noise Design Review
impacts along Rochester Avenue and Church Street. Application
Air Quality
The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent CP/BO C Inspections during
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily tD reduce PM~o construction
emisstuns, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
InspecttDns during 4
Perimeter streets shall be swept according to a schedule established CP/CE C construction A
by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle t/acking
of soil off-site.
Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP/BO C Inspections during A 4
25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such construction
episodes.
Chemical soil stabilizers (appraved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall Inspections during
be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 CP C construction A 4
hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions.
The construction contractor shall select the equipment based on low During Grading plan C
review 2
emission factors and high-energy effidency; and ensure that all CP/BO C
constructjon equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance
with the manufacturers specifications. C
Dudng Grading plan 2
The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternatjve CP C review
fuel powered equipment where feasible.
The construction contractDr shall ensure that construction-grading CP C During Grading plan C
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment review 2
when not in use.
Key to ChecKlist Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions
CDD - Community Development Director A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection I - Withhold Recordatjon of Final Map
CP - City Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO - Building Offidal or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order
pO-policeCaptsinordesignee E-Operating 5-RetainDepositorBonds
6 - Revoke CUP
) FC - Fire Chief or designee
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
SUBTT15174, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 181 LOTS FOR SINGLE
FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 33.13 ACRES OF LAND AND 4 LOTS FOR
TRAIL AND OPEN SPACE PURPOSES IN THE LOW-MEDIUM (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, WITH DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY
PLAN, BOUNDED BY ROCHESTER AVENUE, CHURCH STREET AND
MALAGA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
227-151-52.
A. Recitals.
1. KB HOME filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15174, as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract
Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 11th day of April 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. Following conclusion of
said headng, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 01-39 approving Tentative
Tract 15174.
3. On the 2rid day of May 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
concluded their review of Tentative Tract 15174.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced meeting on May 2nd, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application appfies to property bounded by Church Street, Rochester Avenue,
and Malaga Drive, and is presently vacant property; Rochester Avenue and Church Street are
improved with curb, gutter, and pavement, Malaga Drive is improved only along that portion to the
rear of The Home Depot; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is Tract 15072, commonly known as
Village of Independence; the property to the south consists of The Home Depot and undeveloped
land; the property to the east is commonly referred to as the Rochester Tract, a single-family
residential neighborhood; and the property to the west is undeveloped land; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT15174 - KB HOME
May 2,2001
Page 2
c. The project proposes 181 lots for single-family residential development and 4 lots
for trail and open space purposes; and
d. The project is subject to noise levels of 65 CNEL along Rochester Avenue and
mitigation will be identified by a Noise Study prepared for the project at the time the
Design/Development Review is approved; and
e. The project will generate traffic tdps which can be accommodated through public
street improvement upgrades as conditioned herein; and
f. The project is consistent with the General Plan Low-Medium density residential
land use designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) with a proposed project density of 5.46 dwelling
units per acre; and
g. The proposed project of 181 single-family residential lots is in accord with the
objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the Low-Medium Residential Distdct as
well as the objectives of the Tetra Vista Community Plan; and
h. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the
Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of lot size and dimension,
and project density; and
i. The proposed project and the intended use, together with all conditions of approval
will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity. The project proponents are required to complete all missing parkway
improvements adjacent to the site, as well as install a traffic signal at the intersection of Church
Street and Terra Vista Parkway.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and
the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause sedous public health problems; and
f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by
the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
25b
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15174 - KB HOME
May 2, 2001
Page 3
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for
the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared
therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been
reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed
below as Conditions of Approval.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission
during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below
and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:
Plannin,q Division
1 ) The north side of Malaga Drive is a Terra Vista Trail Type "E," therefore
the sidewalk must be 6 feet in width.
2) The east side of both "A" and "H" Streets includes a continuation of the
Type "D" Trail out to Church Street and Malaga Drive, respectively,
therefore the sidewalk shall be 6 feet in width, and if the length of the
segments permits, the sidewalk shall meander.
3) The Trail Type "D" shall meander through the open space area as
feasible in the final design. The trail connection between Lots 109 and
162 shall be expanded (such as angling the west line of Lot 109).
4)Driveway grades through the tract shall not exceed 10 percent in the
final design.
5) Minimize the conditions as reflected on Section E and F of the Grading
Plan. Avoid conditions where the trial is disproportionately higher or
lower on elevation than the adjoining lot pads.
251
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15174 - KB HOME
MAY 2, 2001
Page 4
Enqineerinq Division
1) All three street frontages shall be improved in accordance to City
standards, including but not limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive
approaches, signing, striping, street trees, and street lights, etc.
Rochester is a "Major Highway," Church Street, and Malaga Drive are
"Secondary."
2) Install traffic signal at Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway.
3) Provide traffic signal interconnect along Church Street frontage.
4) All internal streets shall be fully improved to City "Local Street"
.standards, including but not limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive
approaches, signing, striping, street trees, and street lights, etc.
5) . The slope in the Landscape Maintenance District area shall be
3:1 maximum, and the toe of slope shall be a minimum of 2 feet away
from the edge of sidewalk.
Environmental Mitiqation
Air Quality
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent
(approved by the SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce
PM~o emissions, in accordance with the SCAQMD Rule 403.
2) Perimeter street shall be swept according to a schedule established by
the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of
soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of
construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM~oemissions from the site during such episodes.
4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by the SCAQMD and RWQCB)
shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive
for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~oemissions.
5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency.
The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
Pans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.
6) The Construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered
equipment in-lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TT 15174 - KB HOME
MAY 2, 2001
Page 5
7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading
Plans include a statement that work crews will shut-off equipment when
not in use.
Noise
1 ) A Noise Study must be prepared in conjunction with any development
application to analyze traffic impacts along Rochester Avenue and
Church Street.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF MAY 2001.
GITY COUNGIL OF THE GITY OF RANGHO GUGAMONGA
253
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT 15174
SUBJECT: APN: 227-151-52
APPLICANT: KB HOME
LOCATION: S/W CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ROCHESTER AVENUE
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Completion Date
A. General Requirements
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its J /
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole
discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard / /
Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction
plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check.
B. Time Limits
1. This tentative tract map or tentative pamel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning / /
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the
date of the approval.
C., Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / /
site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan.
SC-12-00 I
Project No. TI' 15174
Completion Date
2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, ~ /
all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
6. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the /~
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
7. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed /._._/
control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review
and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of
street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including
fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
8. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall / /
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's ~
perimeter.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans)
1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. / /
2. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area. ---/ /
E. Landscaping
1. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering __/ /
sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Rochester
Avenue.
2. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment, If located in public maintenance areas, the /__/
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
F. Environmental
1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / /__
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to
retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.
Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be
considered grounds for forteit.
SC-12-00 2
project No. TF 15174
Completion Date
G. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location / /
of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shaft provide a solid overhead structure for
mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
H. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / /
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / /
street centerline):
From 44 to 52 total feet on Church Street ----/ /
From 44 to 52 total feet on Malaqa Drive ----/ /
From 50 to 57 total feet on Rochester Avenue --/ /
I. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped / /
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /
;urb & A.C Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other
Rochester Avenue X C X X
Malaga Drive XX X
Church Street
Notes: (a) Median istand includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during ptan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item
3. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / /
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shaft be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
SC-12-00 3
Project No. ~1' 15174
Completion Date
b. Pr or to any work be ng performed in public r ght-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction ' /J
permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in add t on to any other perm ts
required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / /
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / /
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of
BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer
Notes:
(1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet
apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with
pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __/ /
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. ~ /
4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
J. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / /
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance
District: Median islands, frontaqe alonq Rochester Avenue, Church Street, and Malaqa Drive.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or ~ /
other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_ /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / /
developer until accepted by the City.
so-,2-oo 4 Z 7
Project No. 'l-r 15174
Completion Datq
K. Drainage and Flood Control
1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~/ /
approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
L. Utilities
1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /
2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
M. General Requirements and Approvals
1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /---
new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to
building permit issuance if no map is involved.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE pREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT,
(909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
N. General Fire Protection Conditions
1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer /_--J
shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or
consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the
development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation
of the final map occurs.
2.Fire flow requirement shall be: / /
.1500 gallons per minute
-OR
X A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department
personnel prior to water plan approval.
X For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants
shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel
after construction and prior to occupancy.
3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed,/ /
and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, / /
if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a
4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard.
Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
so- 2-oo
Project No. 'FF 15174
Completion Date
5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be .__//
submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is
available, pending completion of the required fire protection system.
6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final /__/
inspection.
7. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted:
X AI~ roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32.
8. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire/ /
Safety Division for specific details and ordering information.
9. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga / /
Fire Protection District as follows:
X $132 for CCWD Water Ran review/underground water supply.
X $132 for Single Family Residential Tract (per phase).
**Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems
(sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon
submittal of plans.
SC-12-00 6
RANCEO CUGANONGA
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coundl
Jack Lam, AICP, Cib/Manager "'
FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
DATE: May 2, 2001
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
SUBCOMMITTEES RECOMMENDATION TO FILL VACANCY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Subcommittee's suggested appointment of Dr.
Harvey D. Cohen to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation.
BACKGROUND
The City Council's Community Foundation Subcommittee, made up of Diane Willlares and Bob
Dutton, met April 10, 2001 to discuss filling two vacancies. At this time they have one
recommendation and that is to appoint Dr. Harvey D. Cohen.
Respectfully submitted,
bra~J. Ad~s, C~