Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1997/03/05 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wech~esdays - 7:00 p.m. March 5, 1997 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember "" Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 '\~ City Council Agenda March 5, 1997 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo , Gutierrez , and Willjams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclamations to Marc Tang and Corinne Baker commending them for their CPR efforts in saving the life of Mrs. Baker's husband. 2. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the month of March 1997 as American Red Cross Month. 3. Presentaljon of Proclamation to Capt. Ron Bieberdorf commending him for his service to Rancho Cucamonga upon his promotion. 4. Presentation of Proclamation commemorating the Sesquicentennial of the Mormon Pioneers' entering of the Region. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: February 5, 1997 February 19, 1997 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/12/97 and 2/19/97; and 1 Payroll ending 2/6/97 for the total amount of $1,770,877.38. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for 8 Mimi's Care, SWH Corporation, 10909 Foothill Boulevard. r--~ City Council Agenda March 5, 1997 2 4. Approval to authorize the issuance of a Request for Qualifications 10 for Real Estate Broker Services in connection with the sale of City owned property located at 111 N. Grove Avenue in the City of Upland. 5. Approval of Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Application. 12 RESOLUTION NO. 97-020 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND OF THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT 6. Approval of a Resolution urging the local Post Office branches to fly 15 the nationally recognized POW/MIA Flag. RESOLUTION NO 97-021 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE LOCAL POST OFFICE BRANCHES TO FLY THE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED POW/MIA FLAG 7. Approval to authorize the Engineering Division of the City of Rancho 17 Cucamonga to submit to SANBAG projects to be included in Fiscal Years 1998/2005 Regional Transportation Improvement Program. 8. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, 23 Improvement Security and Ordering the Summary Vacation of portions of the BeryI-Hellman Storm Drain Easements and also Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 14410, located at the east side of Beryl Street and south of 19th Street, submitted by Centex Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 97-022 26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14410, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 97-023 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF THE BERYL-HELLMAN STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET AND EAST OF BERYL STREET r-~ City Council Agenda March 5, 1997 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-024 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 14410 9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security 37 and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Development Review No. 96-21, located at the southwest corner of Buffalo Avenue and San Madno Street, submitted by Oltmans Construction Co. RESOLUTION NO. 97-025 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21 RESOLUTION NO. 97-026 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21 10. Approval of request to award balance of term ofjanitorial agreement 43 (CO 97-006) to Janitorial Technologies Incorporated of Tustin, California. 11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 45 13565-5 through 13565-10, located on the northeast corner of Summit and Wardman Bullock, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 97-027 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 13565-5 THROUGH 13565-10 .__.! City Council Agenda March 5, 1997 4 ' 12. Approval to accept Improvements, Release the Letter accepting the 47 responsibility for the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bond received form the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and file a Notice of Completion for DR 94-04, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Old Town Park. Release: Release the Letter from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency accepting responsibility for the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds RESOLUTION NO. 97-028 48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 94- 04, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF OLD TOWN PARK, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96- 0:2 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add regulations prohibiting commercial parties within all residential zones and property used for residential purposes. ORDINANCE NO. 569 (second reading) 49 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION, 17.02.600, TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (NONCONFORMING USE) 2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96- 0__4 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to enact regulations for wireless communication facilities (i.e., cellular transmission) in conformance with Federal Communications Commission regulations. '~~ City Council Agenda March 5, 1997 5 ORDINANCE NO. 570 (second reading) 52 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 17.26 THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 60 ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR INC. - An appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve a request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium SubdMsion Map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoria Planned Community and consideraeon of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue, located on the nodh side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoda Park Lane - APN: 227-091-14 AND 15, and 227-111-12 and 13. Staff has prepared a mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for consideration. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 96-13. RESOLUTION NO. 97-029 166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND THE VACATION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH AND THE EAST COLLECTOR STREET KNOWN AS HANLEY AVENUE, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 96-13 WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227-111-12 & 13 ~~ City Council Agenda , March 5, 1997 6 RESOLUTION NO. 97-030 170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227-111-12 & 13 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES ISSUES (A) STATUS REPORT ON THE TRAVELING VIETNAM MEMORIAl 173 PROJECT (B) UPDATE ON THE LIONS CENTER EAST AND WEST PROJECT 174 (C) REPORT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF A VAN TO BE AVAILABLE 175 AT THE SENIOR CENTER TO TRANSPORT SENIORS FOR THE NUTRITION PROGRAM (D) UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE "Y" PROPERTY NEXT TO 178 MILLIKEN PARK (E) REPORT ON THE PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE 179 ~-~~ City Council Agenda March 5, 1997 7 ! J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 27, 1997, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 5, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetin.q A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 5, 1997 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, locate at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Andrew Arczynski, Assistant City Attorney; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Ron Bieberdorf, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of February 17, 1997 as PTA Week in Rancho Cucamonga in commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the forming of the PTA. Mayor Alexander present the Proclamation to the PTA. The PTA presented the Council with a quilt representing all the schools that are part of the PTA in Rancho Cucamonga which will be displayed at the City facilities. B2. Presentation of Proclamation to Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, for his many years of service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Proclamation and City tile were presented to Paul Rougeau for his service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Item 14 was discussed at this time but the minutes will remain in agenda order. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he would like to add on an Executive Session for Personnel if the Council concurred. MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to add on an Executive Session for personnel matters. Motion carried unanimously. 5-0 D1. Approval of Minutes: December 11, 1996 (Curatalo absent) December 18, 1996 January 15, 1997 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/31/96, 1/8/97 and 1/15/97; and Payroll ending 1/9/97 forthe total amount of $2,768,530.53. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Rocky's New York Style Pizzeria, Lisa and Marcello Hernandez, Aurea Pompa, Augusto Reyes and Jenaro Tinio, 9615 Foothill Boulevard. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for B & J's, Patrick Joseph Mallen, 9653-55 Base Line Road. D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Sunrize Liquor, Gharat B. Patel, 8679 Base Line Road. De. Approval to authorize the adverljsing of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Almond Street and Storm Drain Improvements, located at the southwest corner of Almond Street and Henry Street, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 32-4637-9530. RESOLUTION NO. 97-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ALMOND STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND HENRY STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS DT. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Arrow Route Street improvements at Deer Creek Channel, located between Hermosa and Center Avenues, to be funded from Community Development Prop. 111, Account No. 10-4637-9607. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ARROW ROUTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL, LOCATED BETWEEN HERMOSA AND CENTER AVENUES, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D8. Approval of Point of Histodc Interest 96-02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga -- an application to designate the Logia Felipe Angeles, Inc. Theater, located at 10071 Feron Boulevard, as a Point of Historic Interest - APN: 209-085-04. RESOLUTION NO. 97-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE LOGIA FELIPE ANGELES, INC. THEATER, LOCATED AT 10071 FERON BOULEVARD, AS A HISTORICAL POINT OF INTEREST - APN: 209-085-04 D9. Approval of City PoliCy to Recognize High School Students for Outstanding Citizenship and Service to the Community. D10. Approval of a request from Chapter One of the California Association of School Transportation Officials to waive rental fees for a School Bus Roadeo at the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot. D11. Approval to execute an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Conditional Use Permit No. 96-14, located within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center on the north side of Foothill Boulevard west of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Co. RESOLUTION NO. 97-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-14 D12. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 97-002) for the Traffic Signals and Street Improvements at Base Line Road and East Avenue to J.E.G, Construction Co., in the amount of $201,080.00 ($182,800,00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 8, Account No. 12-4637-9203. D13. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 97-003) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersecljon of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane to TDS Engineering, in the amount of $150,782.00 ($137,075.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Community Development Transportation Systems Development Funds, Account No. 22-4637-9513. D14. Approval of Fund Transfer and Authorize the Continuance of Computer Support Services (AEF, CO 96-050). ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. D15. Approval to release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Tract 13298, generally located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond #229499S $ 32,600.00 Labor and Material Bond #229499S 16,300.00 City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 4 D16. Approval to accept Contract No. CO96-016, the Ninth Street Improvement Project, located between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street, funded from CDBG Funds, Account 28-4333-9316, approve the final contract amount of $198,041.00, Release the Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". RESOLUTION NO. 97-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONTRACT NO. CO96-016, THE NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET, AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Curatalo abstaining from voting on the minutes of December 11, 1996, and Item D14. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 Discussion of Item D14. Approval of Fund Transfer and Authorize the Continuance of Computer Support Services (AEF, CO 96-050). Councilmember Williams stated the staff report does not mention a dollar amount and she needed more information before she could approve this. She referred to the staff reports of March 2 and March 16, 1994 that refers to the purchasing of the computer system and that it supposedly has all kinds of support with the purchase. She read from the staff reports which stated that as part of the long term planning effort, the Redevelopment Agency has set aside funds to insure the acquisition would not have to rely on future dollars. She stated this is 1997 and it appears they are relying on future dollars. She stated this is something she would like clarified for her. She stated she would like an analysis of where the computer system is, where it is going, where it has been, does it work, does it not work, and why we are having to spend all of this money. Jack Lam, City Manager, apologized for the staff report not having dollar amounts. He stated this staff report does not have anything to do with the original computer system, it has to do with an item brought before the Council because 50% of the data processing staff is gone and they need people to operate the system. He stated the salary savings in there is the same salary savings that would be used to manage the programs until they are able to recruit for the vacant positions. He stated newly hired staff will not come on with the City until March, so they are asking for the Council to approve an extension of the contract approved some months ago to help out. He stated once staff is hired on they will not need the outside help. Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, stated in October staff had come to the Council asking for $65,000 for computer suppert of an outside computer specialist who would have one of their staff act as an MIS Manager, He stated they have spent the $65,000, and have suspended their service pending the outcome of Council's vote tonight. He stated they are asking the Council to approve an amount not to exceed $40,000 for an additional 60 days which would be the end of it. This would amount to a total of 6 months that they would provide service to the City. He stated the total contract amount would be $105,000 for the term of the contract. Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out this is a substitute for the staffing that would be on board which are not at this time. Councilmember Biane asked if staff could further define what they are or would be doing to help out. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 5 Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, stated one of their tasks is acting as the MIS Manager, they are helping pdorifize and schedule a number of different programs and projects that are under way. He stated they have money that has been budgeted to buy computer equipment and that most of it has been held up pending the hiring of all the necessary staff. He stated they are helping with putting the software programs on line. Jack Lain, City Manager, pointed out they are helping to install the City's own fire wall instead of borrowing IBM's fire wall which the City gave back to them. Councilmember Williams felt the firewall was supposed to be part of IBM's contract and wondered why we are now having to pay someone to do this. She stated she felt all the support would be included in IBM's agreement. Councilmember Willjams stated she feels left out of what the money is being spent for and that the Council has a responsibility to the citizens to answer questions. She stated the Council needs to know what is going on with the computer system and wants to be kept informed. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated staff would be happy to provide additional information to the Council. Councilmember Biane stated he would like to get a forecast for the future of what will need to be replaced, etc. for two to three years down the road. Jack Lain, City Manager, menljoned that he had reported before at a Council meeting that with the speed that technology is moving the equipment becomes outdated and newer equipment is needed to keep up with the next level. He stated the City's philosophy has not been to automatically move into the newest of technology because it possibly isn't the best developed, but to use equipment that is already proven. Mr. Lam pointed out that the funds being discussed for this agenda item are not over and above what is budgeted. Councilmember Williams stated she would still like the analysis and stated she felt the Council has the responsibility to know as much of these types of situations as possible and urged the City Manager to keep the Council informed. She stated she would probably find it very difficult to ever vote again for a finance program for a five year term such as this because she felt we were paying for something into the future that will be already obsolete. She stated she wished there was something that could be done to short term this out or pay it off or something, She felt this was a lot of interest. She asked if this could be looked at to see if the terms we now have are the best available. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated what the City does on the data processing system is it works the same way as the mobile equipment. He stated all of this is depreciated out so that when it comes time to replace it the funds will be there. He stated staff will look at it to see if there is another alternative to the completion of the lease payments. Councilmember Williams asked if this could all be spelled out on paper so that it is easier to understand. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Curatalo to approve Item D14. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No items were submitted. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 6 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE GROUP CATEGORIES FOR CHURCHES FROM CATEGORY 5 (RESIDENT/COMMERCIAL) TO CATEGORY 3 (RESIDENT/NON-PROFIT WITH PAID MANAGEMENT) Staff report presented by Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager. Councilmember W~lliams stated this was brought to her attention at the Founder's Day Parade and was made aware that churches have to pay for a booth. She felt possibly they should not be charged for this type of activity because of the services they provide. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 96-012A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.0 - RECREATION FEES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION BY REVISING GROUP CATEGORIES FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS FROM CATEGORY 5 TO CATEGORY 3 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-012A. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items were submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. REPORT ON THE PLACEMENT OF SMALL INFORMATION SIGNS ON POLES (Continued from January 15, 1997) Staff report presented by Bill Makshanoff, Building Official. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was not really interested in doing an ordinance at this time until he knew if there was enough staff to enforce it. He felt there should be one person to go around in a truck on Monday momings and monitor this. He felt their main focus should be to check these types of problems out and to also report any graffiti they find. He felt this item should be tabled for now but that he would like to talk about it more at budget time when manpower needs would be discussed. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Gutierrez to continue the item to June, 1997. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 7 A recess was taken at 9:07 p.m. for an Executive Session to occur regarding Personnel. The Council reconvened at 9:53 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. No action was taken in Executive Session. 12. REVIEW OF ZONE CHANGE POLICIES FOR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilmember Biane felt they should go with the plans and zones that are now in place until the Task Force has had the opportunity to review the Foothill Specific Plan. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is willing to go along with Councilmember Biane's recommendation. He stated he would hate to see any more disagreements with the Planning Commission like the Wohl project. He felt the Task Force created should get together soon and get things worked out. Councilmember Willjams stated she did not think it was a good idea to stop development while they are studying the zoning issues. Mayor Alexander asked how long it would take to go through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated when he met with the Council it was agreed that they should work on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven and the I-15 Freeway. He felt it would take about four months to work on this. Councilmember Curatalo felt things should remain as status quo until the study is done. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve staff's recommendation to leave as is for now, but the Task Force to come back with a recommendation in four months. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 13.(A) REPORT ON THE SELECTION PROCESS OF VENDORS USED BY THE CITY Councilmember Gutierrez felt the Council could discuss this at another meeting in more detail when they would be discussing similar issues. He felt the City should go with local vendors as their first choice. He felt there were a lot of areas that needed reviewing. He felt if it involved rebidding, that this should be done. He wanted to make sure local businesses are getling a fair chance and wanted to make sure that the City is paying the best possible price for the best possible service. ACTION: Report received and filed. Councilmember Williams suggested there be a training class for vendors to learn how the City's vendor process and bid process works. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated the City has done this in the past and would be happy to do others in the future because it would not only help vendors, but would also benefit the City. He stated he would be happy to provide any information the Council wants. He also mentioned the City's purchasing policies. (B) APPROVAL TO EXECUTE CONTRACT (CO 96-060) FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE MAINTENANCE WITH WESTEK COMPUTER SERVICES INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF ,$55,867.00 TO BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4161-6028' FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996~97 Councilmember Williams asked at what point do you say you need to purchase new equipment instead of putting it towards warranty. She stated she really didn't get the information in the report she was looking for. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 8 Councilmember Biane stated he felt there is a need to approve the contract now so the broken equipment can be taken care of, but that they should address this matter further at budget time. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve CO 96-060. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 14. DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME ACCORD Mayor Alexander stated that six of the eight parks have signed the Accord and that the Council is very concerned for the residents. Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, who stated the Subcommittee had met and is recommending that the Council direct the City Attorney to draft a rent control ordinance. Mayor Alexander stated he and Councilmember Gutierrez had met and considered the needs of the mobile home community so that they are not taken advantage of. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Clay Hage, Western Mobile Home Park Owner's Association and representing the mobile home owners in Rancho Cucamonga, stated he worked on the first Accord when it was created. He reported that of the two park owners that have not signed the Accord, they are still living by the intent of it. He did not feel the Ordinance would really control rents, and would not solve the rent problems. Mayor Alexander asked why if the owners were following the intent of the Accord, wouldn't they sign it. Mr. Hage stated one of the parks felt it might keep the owner from making improvements. Councilmember Gutierrez stated the rent ordinance would not be done hastily, that it would be drafted and considered carefully by the Council. James Markman, City Attomey, stated he did not feel the residents of the two parks that have not signed were safe, and that at least a rent control ordinance would let those owners know what direction they are headed. Made Schumacher, Pines Mobile Home Park and on residents' committee, stated she disagreed with Mr. Hage and the improvements that the owners are going to make. She stated the owners have not done a thing to improve the place. She added the people that live there cannot afford an increase in rent. Dee Murray, mobile home resident, felt it was commendable that the Council would do this for them. She felt something needed to be done to help out the mobile home residents. Judy Ovem, Pines Mobile Home Park, stated it is very costly for a mobile home owner to up and move his coach. She stated she moved into the park because they liked the idea of the Accord. She stated the rents needed to be kept in line. Carolyn Sharp, Pines Mobile Home Park, wondered what is done with the rent money that is paid to the owners. She stated she did not know what the Accord does for them. Mayor Alexander stated the residents of a park need to let the City know if the owners aren't doing what they are supposed to be doing for the park. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 9 Jack Williams, Ramona Villa Residents Committee Chairperson, stated the Accord was done to help the residents with rent control. He stated if the owners are going to live by the intent of the Accord, why don't they sign it. He commented on pass-throughs and felt it was another word for poor management. He felt the parks owners should be doing their part of keeping the park in good condition. He hoped the Council would proceed with the approval of the rent control ordinance. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to direct the City Attorney to start drafting an ordinance through a study to support it. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Biane stated he recently worked on the Mobile Home Subcommittee to get all of the owners to sign the Accord. He stated the Council is here to protect the owners. Councilmember Willlares thanked the people for coming out and thanked the people who have put so many hours into this. She stated she supported what Councilmember Biane previously said. She asked Mr. Hage to pass this information on to the park owners. Councilmember Curatalo stated he is eager to direct staff to go forward with the Ordinance. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he supported what the residents are saying and did not feel they should be treated badly. He wanted to help the residents all he could. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. A recess was taken at 8:11 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:26 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. 15. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Mayor Alexander suggested that all of this information be put in the Grapevine. Councilmember Willlares felt the Route 30 information should also go in the Visions paper. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to present further information at the next meeting regarding the vendor item and would like that on the agenda. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes February 5, 1997 Page 10 Jack Lam, City Manager, introduced Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I, stating she will be working in the City Manager's office and that she is from the Bay Area. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located on Rochester, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Valley Baseball and Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Negotiating Parties; regarding terms of payment, and to adjourn in the memory of David Axford and Drew Richards. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m. No action was taken in executive session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: February 19, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetin.q A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 19, 1997 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Manager; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debbie Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Jack Lam, City Manager, introduced Rod Hoops who would be the new police chief for Rancho Cucamonga starting on March 1. Captain Hoops stated he is glad to be part of Rancho Cucamonga and that he will do his best to serve the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Council. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the public hearing date on Item D10 should be changed to Apdl 16 instead of Apdl 2. He asked that this be noted in the Resolution setting the public hearing. City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 2 D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/22/97, 1/29/97 and 2/5/97; and Payroll ending 1/23/97 forthe total amount of $3,231,945.95. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedules as of December 31, 1996 and January 31, 1997. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for Sam's Place, Craig Vercnocke and Thomas Oeschger, 6620 Carnelian Avenue. D4o Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General and Off-Sale Beer & Wine for Thrifty and Payless Drugstores, Thrifty Payless, Incorporated, 9650 Base Line Road. D5o Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General and Off-Sale Beer & Wine for Thrifty and Payless Drugstores, Thrifty Payless, Incorporated, 8760 19th Street. D6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Base Line Parkway Improvements, located between Deer Creek Channel and Milliken Avenue, to be funded from Beauti~cation Funds, Account No. 21-4647-9614. RESOLUTION NO. 97-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BASE LINE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED BETWEEN DEER CREEK CHANNEL AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D7. Approval to destroy records and documents which are no longer required as provided under Government Code Sections 34090 and 34090.5. RESOLUTION NO. 97-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 34090 AND 34090.5 D8. Approval of Minimum Wage Adjustment for Part Time Employees. D9. Approval of the Disposition of City Owned Property (Summit Avenue) while reserving an easement for street and public utility purposes, submitted by L.D. King, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 97-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IS NOT REQUIRED BY TITLE TO BE FEE SIMPLE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN THE QUITCLAIM DEED AND TO PRESENT SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 3 D10. Approval of the formation of Assessment District 93-01, Masi Plaza, at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Council actions are: Declaring the District Boundaries; Declaring Intention for Certain Improvements and Issuance of Bonds; and Approving the Engineer's Report. RESOLUTION NO. 97-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 97-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS RESOLUTION NO. 97-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS D11. Approval to Release Lien Agreement for San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel No. 201-055-49, Foothill Communities Church of Nazarene, located on Highland Avenue, from the Alta Loma Creek Channel to 600 feet east. RESOLUTION NO. 97-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A LIEN AGREEMENT WITH FOOTHILL COMMUNITIES CHURCH OF NAZARENE D12. Approval to execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 97-005) with Martin and Chapman Co. for consul~ng services with respect to the mail ballot process for ratification of PD-85, and appropriate funds in the amount of $22,731.91 from Account No. 90-4130-6028. D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct no. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 96-22, located on the north side of Fourth Street west of Etiwanda Avenue, in the General Industrial District, submitted by Heritage Bag Company, a Texas Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 97-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 96-22 City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 97-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 96-22 D14. Approval to accept Improvements, Release Bonds and File a Notice of Completion for CUP 93-49, generally located between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street and between Spruce and Elm Streets. Release: Faithful Performance Bond 15667S $144,200.00 Faithful Performance Bond 15668S 34,200.00 Faithful Performance Bond 15669S 401,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond 15666S 108,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 97-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONDS, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 93-49, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AND BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM STREETS MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item D1 and as corrected in Item D10. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/22/97, 1/29/97 and 2~5~97; and Payroll ending 1123/97 for the total amount of $3,231,945.95. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if this would include all three agencies, i.e., Redevelopment Agency, Fire District and City. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it only included the City. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to approve Item D1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Eo CONSENT ORDINANCES No items were submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE BONDS - Approval to issue bonds for the construction of Villa Pacifica, a 158-unit senior housing community near the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. Staff report presented by Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst. City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 5 Coundlmember Biane asked with the City as the vehicle to facilitate the financing, is the City in any way puffing itself out there for liability if there was a default of the bond financing. Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst, stated no, that Bank of America would be purchasing the bonds dght away, that they would not go out to public bid. She stated the Agency has no liability whatsoever. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is a classic conduit financing where the City is using its tax exempt status through which this transaction is made. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 97-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ITS REVENUE BOND SERIES 1997A (VILLA PACIFICA SENIOR COMMUNITY PROJECT) MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Willjams to approve Resolution No. 97-019. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add regulations prohibiting commercial parties within all residential zones and property used for residential purposes. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 569. ORDINANCE NO. 569 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION, 17.02.600, TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (NONCONFORMING USE) MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 569 for March 5, 1997. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F3. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 96-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to enact regulations for wireless communication facilities (i.e., cellular transmission) in conformance with Federal Communications Commission regulations. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public headng was closed. City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 6 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 570. ORDINANCE NO. 570 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 17.26 THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 570 for March 5, 1997. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items were submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. REPORT ON THE SELECTION PROCESS OF VENDORS USED BY THE CITY (Continued from February 5, 1997) Councilmember Guljerrez stated he has received a lot of statistical information from Larry Temple and Susan Stark. He stated there is a lot of money that is paid to people outside the City. He stated the City is giving $7,7 million worth of business back into the City. He stated the total figure to vendors outside the City was $23.9 million which he stated that many of those payments are special types of payments, i.e., utility companies, bond payments, etc. He stated the RDA is paying about $2,9 million back into the City and $26.2 million outside of the City. He stated for the Fire Distdct there is about $114,000 worth of vendor money inside the City and $3.7 million outside. He felt the City could try a little harder to do business with more vendors in the City and do a little checking to see if they are competitive. He felt the staff should be checking with the vendors for competitive pdcing. He hoped that the City does not get in a hurry and that they take the time to check out local vendors first. He felt local vendors should be given the chance to do business with the City first. He added that Susan Stark had told him her staff would be happy to give the Council information on the bidding process, etc., and that he would probably put this on the agenda in the future. Mayor Alexander stated everyone in the City is guilty of using businesses outside the City, and that even candidates running for office have used outside vendors for their campaigns. Councilmember Gul~errez stated he wanted to review the process and invite people to do business in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Councilmember Curatalo asked if the City had outreach programs to address Councilmember Gutierrez's COI1cerrlS. City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 7 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City has from time-to-time contacted the Chamber of Commerce or other organizations to sponsor seminars on how to do business with the City, how to get on bid lists, etc. He stated any company that wants to get on the bid list should contact Purchasing and they will be put on the list. He added the City has a purchasing manual that lists the steps involved for the process. He stated there is a policy very similar to other City's to give a sales tax credit to be computed in the local business person's bid. He stated they get the "favor" or credit of the sales tax. He stated not only does the City look for the best pdce, but they are looking for the service and good product. Councilmember Williams stated she supported Councilmember Gutierrez 100%. She felt the City is probably using vendors outside the City because they are cheaper. She felt this was worth looking into and that it was worth pursuing. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the City should set some goals and start using businesses in the City. Councilmember Curatalo felt the staff will do whatever is possible to address Councilmember Gutierrez's concerns. ACTION: Report received and filed. 12. DISCUSSION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. He also introduced Bob Dutton, Chairman of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. Bob Dutton stated the Foundation was formed when the current City Council was not even in office which was in the 1980's. He felt when the Foundetion was formed their focus was the development of a performing arts center. He stated a lot of "movers and shakers" in the City are no longer here. He commented that his office is now doing the bookkeeping to alleviate City staff from having to do this, and that his office is also doing the Treasurer's report so that City staff does not have to do this. He stated the Foundation needs to start working on the endowment program. He did not think the Foundation could do the work on this program alone. He felt the Council should give the funds to support a director for the Foundation to manage this program. He stated the reason his office started doing the bookkeeping was because the City wanted to charge the Foundation $35.00. He did not feel his office should have to be taking care of everything for no charge. Councilmember Biane felt staff should investigate how much it would cost to assist the Foundation with their programs. Councilmember Curatalo asked if there was any research done to see if there are any grants to fit into this program. Bob Dutton stated there was research done about four years ago, but that it has not been looked into since that time. He stated there are a lot of organizations and foundations out there that will fund different types of programs and projects. He stated you need a grant writer to do this for you for which there would be a cost involved. He did not feel the Foundation should be put to rest, but he felt the endowment program would be very beneficial. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to see a group of people that have a love for this type of thing involved. Jack Lain, City Manager, provided information on the history of the Foundation and what irs purpose was to be. He stated because of the 501c status there would have to be some distance given between the Foundation and the involvement of City staff. City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 8 Mayor Alexander felt this should be revisited now so that we know this for sure. Councilmember Williams commended Bob Dutton for his commitment and for the work his staff has done to keep this thing going. She stated she did not want to see the Foundation fold, but felt she would like to see it as its own body. She also felt a grant writer would be very beneficial. James Markman, City Attorney, stated that a City employee cannot staff a Foundation because it would hurt its 501c status. He stated it was his understanding that the Foundation would have to act independently. He stated even Mr. Francis, who was the attorney for the Foundation in the beginning, felt the City and the Foundation should be separate as much as possible. Councilmember Biane suggested that the Foundation could apply for CDBG money if they met the criteria. Mayor Alexander felt the City should make a commitment to do whatever it can for the Foundation. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired how much authority the City can have and if they should be telling the Foundation what they should be doing or not doing. Bob Dutton stated he would contact some people that deal in this area and then report back to the Subcommittee with the information. Coundlmember Biane felt this would be a good idea and that Duane Baker should be advised of his findings. He felt staff should come back with the answers instead of Mr. Dutton having to carry the burden. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated what he is hearing the Council say is what are some other cffies doing that have had Foundations and how are they doing, and what can be done to get people in to help with funding and getting the endowment program going. Also, what can be done to get someone to help with grant writing. Bob Dutton stated they also need to investigate how far the City can go in helping before it will hurt the 501 c status of the Foundation. The Council concurred. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Williams stated she had some items she would like considered as Park and Recreation Facilities items. A. She wanted to know what the status is on the Vietnam Traveling Memorial. She stated the date has been set and is there any update at all. B. She stated she would like an update on the Lions Center East and West progress. She asked if we were in or out of budget, are we in the time frame of getting finished, etc. C. She stated she would like a report on seeking a van to be available to the Senior Center to assist them with the nutrition program. City Council Minutes February 19, 1997 Page 9 D. She stated she would like an update on the "Y" property next to Milliken Park. She stated Lewis Homes has talked about getling involved in this. She would like to know who owns it, what is there and what is its relationship to the park property. She stated she would like to know about the possibility of portable buildings there. E. She asked if The Grapevine is printed locally or far away. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated they would check into all of these items and report back to the Council. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Clayton Huckaby, business owner in Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the proposed apartment complex project on Base Line has a status report to be given tonight. Mayor Alexander stated the matter will be presented at the March 5 City Council meeting. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negoljalions for propen'y located along the west side of Grove Avenue, south of Arrow Highway; Linda Daniels, RDA Manager, negoljaljng party; regarding price and terms of payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CITY OF RANC UCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-13-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 0~/1~/97 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 70 RANCHO CUCAMONgA CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP MEETINg 112999- 28.00 <<< 113000 - 113004 4403 CALIF. PAVEMENT MAINT. CO., INC. PAVEMENT MORT CONTRACT # 113003* 1,529 64 <<< 113006 - 113211 4803 C A P P O SEMINAR 113212* 235.00 ~<< 113213 - 113423 16695 EXPERIAN MEMBERSHIP 113423* 50.00 <<< 113424 - 113453 16671 CAMES SECURITY ALARMS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS # 113453 500.45- (<< 113434 - 113511 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113513 61.96- ((( 113513 - 113554 5300 MAYER, COBLE & PALHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113555 1,873.00- <<< 113556 - 113599 5284 RESOURCE SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113600* 47,58- <<< 113601 - 113655 4518 DOUBLETREE HOTEL RESERVATIONS 113656* 353 10 4518 DOUBLETREe HOTEL RESERVATIONS 113657* 353,10 3358 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING REGISTRATION 113658* 280,00 2358 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING REGISTRATION 113659* 380,00 3356 GARCIA, VIVIAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 113660* 148,91 <<< 113661 - 113664 16696 1997 C,A P,E, TRAININg CONFERENCE 8TH ANNUAL LAW ENFORCEMNT MTg 113665 370.00 I A & A EGUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 113666 271,79 4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO DEVELOPINg & SUPPLIES # 113667 17,09 1098 A g ENgINEERINg PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113668 500,00 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113669 10037,95 7 ABLETRONICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113670 408 ADAMS0 DEBBIE LEAGUE OF CITIES MgT, 113671 39,80 16698 ALBANESE, BARBARA RECREATION REFUND 113673 37,00 4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO, INSTALLATION/SERVICE 113~73 85,00 5212 ALEXAKISo JANET INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113674 84.00 3658 ALL STAR gLASS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 113675 451,58 3778 ALPERT° MELANIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113676 643.00 1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS OFFICe SUPPLIES 113677 517,07 4564 AMHeALTH MED. GROUP OF CALIF, 0P.C, MEDICAL SERVICES # 113678 2693 AMTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CO, MONTHLY SERVICE 113679 125. O0 3902 APOGEE HEALTH SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113680 756,00 4443 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTINg PRO~ESSIONAL SERVICES 113681 200,00 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 113~82 5,823,50 2437 ASSOCIATED gROUP, THE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 113683 1,734,65 4551 BACHMAN, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113684 135.00 4475 BARNES & NOBLE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 113685 88.36 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113686 ~863 BEE REMOVERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 113687 55,00 5119 BENSON0 MAURY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113688 302.00 16697 BERGERSON0 MARLENE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 113689 309.60 16692 BEST CONTRACT DEPOSIT REFUND 113690 4699 BORDNER, MARgIE INSTRUCTOR PMT 113691 391,50 <<< 1136~3 - 113693 4369 BRODART BOOKS LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 113694 CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA LiST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-12-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 02/12/97 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 1166 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113695 375.00 3315 BURCH FORD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 113~96 38.99 552 BURK-BLACKSCHLEgER, ROSEANN INSTRUCTOR PMT 113697 2,446.71 3942 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 113698 255.00 937 CALCOMP INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 113699 97.00 3057 CALFON CONSTRUCTION INC. PROGRESS ESTIMATE # 113700 48,373.85 62 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION 113701 16670 CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE ALLIANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I13702 490 O0 4735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113703 274.01 1~71 CAMES SECURITY ALARMS, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 313704 10 45 505~ CARDINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASBESTOS SURVEY 113705 375.00 16693 CATRON, DALE TUiTiON REIMBURSEMENT 113706 250.00 3751 CELSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 113707 300.29 68 CENTRAL CITIES SlgN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113708 31.B0 488 CHEVRON U S A, INC GASOLINE CHARGES 113709 53.55 3118 CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 113710 747.74 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 113711 2,787.10 74 CITY RENTALS EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES # 113712 416.95 949 CLARK, KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113713 257.40 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113714 669.88 2362 COM SER COMPANY, INC. SERVICE/REPAIRS # 113715 1,262.96 5286 COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113716 150.15 130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 113717 8, 539.66 643 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 113718 70.04 633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113719 1,058.19 647 CORONA INDUSTRIAL SAND COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113720 1,955.22 4316 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 113721 5.32 4618 CREATIVE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113722 4,463.28 ((( 113723 - 113724 85 CUCAMONgA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 113725 2°607.47 239 D & K CONCRETE CO STREET MAINTENANCE # 113726 620,65 4488 DAGHDEVIRIAN, KATHY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113727 201.~0 284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES # 113728 176.27 347 DAY-TIMERS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 113729 39.85 3698 DEALERS AUTO TRIM VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 113730 45.00 5311 DELANEY, DANAE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113731 390.00 60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF C/M_IF DENTAL INSURANCE 113732 21,680.34 4366 DEMCO OFFICE SUPPLIES 113733 384.32 902 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 113734 7,586.03 107 DETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES 113735 21.01 4544 DICK, ERIC EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH # 113736 75.00 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 113737 30.47 640 DRESCO REPRODUCTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 113738 140.00 19~2 DURA ART STONE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113739 2,020.31 5213 EASON, MARY ANNE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113740 27.00 16694 ECONOMICS PRESS INC., THE SUBSCRIPTION 113741 3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHIC8 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113742 2047 7137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE MISC 113743 1,530.00 229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCT8 IRRIGATION SUPPLIER # 113744 4914 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES OFFICE SUPPLIES # 113745 120.15 4609 FACTS ON FILE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 113746 18.55 CITY OF RANCh ~AMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-t2-97 496/97) RUN DATE: 02/12/97 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO WARR AMT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP DELIVERY SERVICE 113747 15.50 2909 FILTER RECYCLINg SERVICE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113748 80.00 4895 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113749 155,93382 4895 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 113750 212,727 50 1082 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 113751 29 04 5007 OARCIA, DORINDA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113752 85.50 5288 OARMElT CONC. CORINg & SAWINg, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113753 320.00 1254 GENERAL BINDINg CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113754 81.43 139 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES # 113755 81.98 5312 GOODHEART, PAULA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113736 399. O0 5120 GORDON, WILLIAM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113757 142.56 3827 gREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113738 193.27 4386 gREgORY, CHERI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113739 80.00 <<< 113760 - 113761 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 113762 2,819.54 14523 HALIKSA, ALlSON BUSINESS LICENSE 113763 858.43 2855 HAVEN WINE & LIQUOR CO. SUB-COMMITTEE MEETINGS 113764 118.51 3334 HEILIO, KELLY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113765 1,127.04 14429 HIX DEVELOPMENT CORP BUSINESS LICENSE 113766 1,000.00 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113767 390 83 1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113768 188.36 161 HOYT LUMBER CO · S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113769 148.93 2412 HOYT, RAYMOND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113770 1,497.15 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113771 234.74 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113772 23.00 4188 I D BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113773 404.66 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM 113774 2,222.25 3885 INLAND LAWNMOWER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 113775 546.94 907 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE 113776 7.50 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS # 113777 165.76 1941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC. MAINT SUPPLIES # 113778 159.09 175 JOBS AVAILABLE ADVERTISEMENTS 113779 79.20 5214 JOHNSON, SANDRA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113780 33.00 4700 JONES, KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113781 86.40 14522 KHAN, TALAT RECREATION # 113782 307.50 4329 KINg, PATRICK INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113783 79.20 5215 KISLINgBURY, CHRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113784 4200 1471 KNAPP SHOE COMPANY SAFETY SHOES 113785 40.64 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113786 53.37 14433 KOONIE, TINA RECREATION 113787 49.50 172 KOZLOVICH. DEBBIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113788 1,134.00 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113789 3,062.45 321 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 113790 18,756.00 5216 LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113791 93 O0 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113792 32.77 2358 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETINg REGISTRATION # 113793 1,440.00 14520 LEVY, FRANCIS X. CLAIM SETTLEMENT 113794 3,252.73 14521 LOCKETT, KELLY RECREATION 113795 40.00 1455 LONG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESS[NO 113796 7.53 5313 LOWE, MARIAANE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113797 72,00 5276 M & P MOBILE HOMES MAINTENANCE 113798 140.60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-12-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 02/12/97 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARN NO WARN. AMT ee CHECK# OVERLAP 549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 113799 18,703.43 72 MARK CHNIS. INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113800 20.88 <<< 113801 - 113801 76 MARKMAN, ARCZYNSKI,HANSON,& KING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 113802 24,001.50 4763 MARKS CABLEVISION ADVERTISINg 113803 40.90 4727 MARSHALL PLUMBINg REHAB. PROGRAM 113804 486.28 14261 MARSHALL, LAURA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 113805 12.60 4701 MARSHALL, SYLVIA RECREATION REFUND 113806 183.60 250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE TOWING SERVICES # 113807 90 O0 4494 MASCARENAS. SUSAN RECREATION REFUND 113808 53.46 5283 MAYER, COBLE & PALMEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 113809 1,250.00 3015 MC CALL. SUSAN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113810 8 40 1125 MC GABEC MACHINE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113811 156.63 1025 MC MASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113812 41.26 14519 MESSING, JOSEPH CLAIM SETTLEMENT 113813 192~44 3860 MOBILE MINI, INC. STORAGE SUPPLIES 113814 225.01 4374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC. EGUIPMENT RENTAL 113815 136~55 403 MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113816 3,117.76 1171 MOTOROLA COMMUN. & ELEC.. INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113817 46.20 3316 MR. T'S 24-HR. TOWINg TOWINg 113818 75.00 4373 N.I.G.P ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 113819 135.00 <<< 113820 - 113820 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 113821 954.71 593 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION NNA MEMBERSHIP BUSS 113822 198~00 9314 NRPA MEMBERSHIP DUES # 113823 <<< 113824 - 113824 923 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 113825 1,334.84 527 OLYMPIC STUDIOS. INC. INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113826 1,738.28 14524 ONE SUCH FILLMS RECREATION # 113827 1,711.00 3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113828 193.50 239 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113829 12,270.77 3953 PACIFIC COAST AIR TOOL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113830 69.39 338 PACIFIC EGUIPT & IRRIGATION, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113831 3,210.48 9871 PALgEN, NANCY RECREATION REFUNDS 113832 99.00 9875 PAN COM PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE EXPENSE REFUND 113833 2,132.00 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES # 113834 71.65 4952 PARKEN DIRECTORY SUBSCRIPTION 113839 60.77 5318 PARKER. SHANNON INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113836 84.00 9873 PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOC OF CA MEMBERSHIP 113837 403.33 757 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113838 135.82 5180 PERRY'S PLUMBINg PLUMBING & MOOTEN MAINTENANCE 113839 100.78 272 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER RENTAL 113840 311.45 259 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 113841 237.91 1049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113842 378.87 2719 PONCHAUD, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT # 113843 291.96 9874 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND RESERVE ENROLLMENT 113844 241.08 3316 PRECISION gYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113843 136.13 4841 PRESTON, MICHAEL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113846 120.00 3286 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE 113847 63,987.87 <<< 113848 - 113848 >>> 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113849 948.43 CITY OF RANCt JCAMONQA LIST OF h. .ANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-12-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 02/12/97 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ** CHECK# OVERLAP 4440 PUTMAN, BILL WANG COMPUTER SERVICE 113850 1,500 O0 4420 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113851 759 64 <(( 113852 - 113852 251 R & R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # 113853 1,885&0 418 R M A GROUP SOIL TESTING SERVICES 113854 7&1.50 2705 R H.F., INC. VEHICLE MAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES # 113855 132.90 1165 RICHARDSON AUTO BODY, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 113856 491.36 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS # 113857 4831 3314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES # 113858 4,079.20 &26 ROBLES, RAUL P., SR. TIRE REPAIR # 113859 180 O0 16 ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113860 10189 4142 ROYAL PIPE & SUPPLY MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 113861 18.92 8260 8ALVIATI, MARTHA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113862 153.00 446 SAN BERN CO AGRICULTURE DEPT. WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES 113863 13,235.37 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC MAINT SUPPLIES 113864 249.98 5317 SANTANA, LIVIER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113865 93.00 3067 SAUL, SANDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113866 453.75 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 113867 841.53 3717 SERVICE MERCHANDISE SUIPPLIES # 113868 500.79 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC TELEPHONE SERVICES 113869 70.48 5274 SHAROU, DIANA GRAPHIC DESIGNER 113870 370 O0 351 SIGN SHOP, THE MAINT SUPPLIES # 113871 294 17 3276 SINCLAIR PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113872 235 24 1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 113873 17.22 <<( 113874 - 113874 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS # 113875 79,008.22 4961 SOUTHEAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 313876 ((( 113877 - 113882 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 113883 6,72440 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 113884 6,139.00 4733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES # 113885 407 80 2344 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL # 113886 66.57 1151 TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES # 113887 402.67 2718 TERRY, DONNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113888 305.25 3333 TODD, SYLVIA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113889 198.00 4558 U.S gUARDS CO , INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE 113890 1,025.0~ 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES # 113891 1,653.00 5308 UNITED MERCHANDISING CORPORATION SUPPLIES 113892 59.25 667 VISA VISA MONTHLY BILLINOS # 113893 948.50 499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BILLING 113894 7,018.25 1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES # 113895 77923 4714 VPD/PVT LIBRARY SUPPLIES 113896 44.36 4002 WASTE MANAGEMENT INDUSTRIES WASTE MANAGEMENT # 113897 147.80 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 113898 2,284.39 4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES # 113899 3,312.82 477 WEST PUBLISHING CO PUBLICATIONS # 113900 518.58 267 WESTERN ROCK CO ASPHALT & CONCRETE # 113901 360.00 94 WOLFINBARGER INC., O.F. LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 113902 296.31 675 WYNN'S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES # 113903 340.42 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 113904 10,516.34 348 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES # 113905 223.10 TOTAL 831.522 67 CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-19-97 (96/97) RUN DATE: 02/19/97 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT ** CHECK# OVERLAP 1258 ELLIS, dANA REIMBURSE FOR BUSINESS EXPENSE 113906* 20.00 958 HIggINS, MARTI CERT SUPPLIES 113907* 2000 16700 APA HOUSING BUREAU MEETING 113908* 125.00 492 AMER1CAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 113909* 38500 <<< 113910 - 113910 3785 ACTION ART RECREATION SUPPLIES # 113911 2,507.78 16699 ADAMSON. RON REIMBURSEMENT 113912 32 71 4782 ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113913 2,384 O0 <<< 113914 - 113914 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS # 113913 1,430 87 16351 ALEXANDER, DIANE RECREATION REFUND 113916 180 O0 492 AMERICAN PLANNINg ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 113917 385.00 492 AMERICAN PLANNINg ASSOCIATION APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 113918 343.00 16700 APA HOUSING BUREAU MEETINg 113919 125 O0 5243 ARLY SOUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113920 100 O0 4473 B & D SPECIALTIES, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113921 418 90 16719 SILTMORE HOTEL MEETINGS # 113922 221 16 2209 BLAIR, INgRID SCAg MEETINg # 113923 lO0. O0 2440 BURRUSO. LISA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 113924 46.80 3942 CAL WESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE 113925 135.00 4794 COLEMAN, ANNA ESR1 USER gROUP MTg. 113926 100.00 4249 COPPER STATE COMMUNICATIONS' TELEPHONE SYSTEM 113927 14,060.00 <<< 113928 - 113929 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 113930 3.010 41 14532 DE MIS PAQDRES, RAICES RECREATION 113931 70.00 5121 DE VOOOHT, SCOTT O PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113932 1,230. O0 4895 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 113933 47,319.86 4895 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 113934 290,285,00 744 GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS DEFERRED CDMP 113935 4,914 O0 137 gTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 113936 6,709 81 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS 113937 2,443.00 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE # 113938 294.60 14328 HITCHRAN. EDWIN RECREATION 113939 207 50 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113940 325.94 1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113941 12942 161 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113942 243.79 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS. INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 113943 111.73 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP 113944 1,679.00 4254 IBM CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113943 30250 14529 KEY, AgNETHA QUARTEY RECREATION 113946 35.00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113947 22 93 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS. INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 113948 648.06 14326 LLOYD'S EQUIPMENT MISC 113949 -~ 432 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION REGISTRATION 113950 30.97 4763 MARKS CABLEVISION ADVERTISINg 113951 2,04920 14530 MARTINEZ, NICK RECREATION 113932 30.00 3907 MASTER-SORT, INC. PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 113953 14527 MIRAMONTES, DON REIMBURSEMENT 113934 131.00 14548 MONTEREY MARRIOTT MEETINO 113935 393.80 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 113956 62 06 14533 NATIONAL SOCIETY OF ACCOUNTANTS MEMBERSHIP DUES 1139~7 94 OO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 02-19-~7 (~6/975 RUN DATE: 02/1~/V7 PAQE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR AHT, i, CHECk# OVERLAP 14323 NORTH TOWN HOUSING PERMIT REFUND 1139~8 1,000.00 ~23 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 113939 1,330. 52 2304 OLIVIERo MICHAEL REIMBURSEMENT 113~60 163.00 70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP MEETIN~ # 113961 98.00 9876 RODRIGUEZ, NICHELLE RECREATION 113962 40.00 9872 SANTANA, LIVIER RECREATION 113963 60.00 5310 SPECIAL TEE'S RECREATION 113964 985.64 9877 VAR~AS, BERNADETTE RECREATION 113965 150.00 2868 WALL STREET JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION 113966 188,56 399 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES 113967 10,40~.32 ** TOTAL 400,882.45 C4LtfOSSta DROPPING PARTNER fiPPLIC~/!~N FaB ~LCOHOL BE!/EFi~fE LiCENSE{S} TO: - DepaztmentofAkohoLicBcveragcControl File Number .............. 327748 3737 Main St., SLdte 900 Receipt Number ......... 1122741 Riverside, CA 92501 Geographical Code ....... .t615 Issued Date DISTRICT SERVING LOC~TION: Name of Business: MIMIS CAFE Location of Business: Numl~r and Street 10909 FOOTBILL BLVD City, State Zip Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 County SAN BERNARDINn Is premise inside city limits? YES Mailing Address: (Ifdifferent.fi'om . 17852 E 17TIt ST S BLDG 108 premise address) TUSTIN CA 92680 If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: .,./~ License 'r'v~e ?tanslee±on ?v~e Fee 'l'v~e BasEer DUD 1.41 ON-SkLE BEER AND W ORT. GINAL NA YES 0 JAN 27,1997 $300.00: 2.41 ON-SALE BEER .MID W ANNUAl, FEE NA YES 0 ,.TAlq 27,1997 $205.00: TOTAL S505.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a febny? NO Act. or reSll|aUons of the Department per~mning to the Act? YES Explain an,v "Yes" answer to the above questions on a/1 attachment which shall be deemed part of this aepiication. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise wilt have all the qualifications of a licensee. and (b) that he witl not violate or cause or permzt to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STA'FE OF CALIFORNIA County of ORANGE Date JAN 27,1997 Under penalty ot periury. each person whose ~tgnature appears below. ternties and says: (I) He Is an applicanL or one of the applicants. or an executr/e officer of the apphcant corporanon. named in the foregoing appljcauon. duly authorized ro make this applicauon on its behalf; {2) ~hat he has read the foregoing and knows the contents lhereof and that each ot r~e above s~atements tt~cre~n rn,Me are true: 13} ~ no pe~on omer man the applicant or applicants has any direct or Inchreel interest in Ihe anpl~cant or appncanfs nusmess co be conducted under the license(s) for winch ~,'1a$ applicauo~ ~s rvmde; (4) flint the transfer appiicauon or proposed u'~nsfcr is no~ made to sansly the payment of a loan or in fulfill an agreement en~erecl into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transler aoplicauon ~s filled w~th ~he Departmere or to gmn or establish a pmtPd'~nce to or for any creditor or tra/Bt'efor or to defraud or injure any cz'e~Litor ot Itansferor:. (5) thai ~e transfer app|icauon may be wrhdrawn by e~ther tbe applicant or the licensee weth no resulung liability to the De13arlrnenL Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) SwH CORPORATION (P-121 SEE ATTACHED ABC-211 SIG RECEIVED _RECEIVED- CiTY OF RANCHO OUOAMONGA PLA.',L,;!I',;G DIVIS!ON JAN 2 9 ]557 FEB 8 1997 Alcoholic Beverage Contro m Rive rsid e 'i's8s9 10slis i1 i sSs4 Ss ~.BC 211 (5/96) '~' Application for an ABC License Application: New on-site license ......... Applicant: Mimi's Cafe ~ Address: 10909 Foothill Blvd. Site Zoning: ISP, Subarea 7, Corm~nity COn'k'T~Cial Adjacent Zoning: North: T.V.S.P., Corm~nity Commerdal South: I.S.P., Subarea 7, Industrial Park ...... ~' ......._ __ East: I.SP., Subarea 7, Industrial Park West: I.S.P., Subarea 7, Industrial Park /'//'/ ,/ W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5. 1997 Mayor and Members or' the City Council Jack Lain. AICP. City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jo~ Ma~in, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHO~ZE THE ISSUANCE OF A ~QUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR REAL ESTATE BROKER SERVICES IN CO~ECTION WITH THE S~E OF CITY O~ED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 111 NORTH GROVE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF UPLAND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorized staff to issue a Request for Qualifications tbr Real Estate Broker Services in connection with the sale of the City owned property located at 111 North Grove in the City of Upland. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS For a number of years now, the location and age of the original City Yard at 111 North Grove Avenue have been issues of concern. The site being at the far west side of the City, has the effect of maximizing travel time to and from the site. Also, even though maintenance crews endeavor to keep the area clean and orderly, the old buildings and general nature of the maintenance activities make the tasks difficiult. The usefulness of the site as a storage area is far out weighed by the logistical and liability issues posed by the poor location and advanced age of the buildings. For these reasons, selling the old Grove Yard would better accommodate the current Corporate Yard by providing funds for future improvments to the newer yard site. The improvements to the new yard would provide adequate replacement of storage facilities and additional improvements such as a modern wash rack facility for City and Fire Department fleets. This Site was purchased by the City from the County shortly after incorporation. Since the development of the current corporate yards on Ninth Street the Old Yards has been used for several purposes including storage of bulk supplies. The Fuel Tanks were removed and disposed, under permit by the county Environmental Agency in 1990. There was no soil contamination concerns found with this removal. -, j CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GROVE YARD March 5, 1997 Page 2 The site has received a Geocnvironmcntal Assessment (Phase One) lbr l lazardous Materials Report in 1996 and the site has been cleared tbr disposal and is environmentally sate. An Appraisal was completed in the fall of 1996. The site was valued at approximately $225,000 and is zoned commercial. Respectfully submitted, // Willia ell City Engineer WJO:JM:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION RECO~IMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga approve a Resolution for a Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Fifth Cycle application BACKGROUND In 1991, the Legislature passed AB 2076 (Sher), the Califomia Oil Recovery Enhancement Act (Act). The Act requires oil manufactures to pay $0.04 to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for each quart of lubricating oil sold, beginning October 1, 1992. This Act includes a ten million dollar government "block grant" program. Block grant funds w411 be available to governmental agencies to establish and administer used oil collection programs. The Block Grant funds are a non-competitive fund and have very few requirements. The requirements are; the funds must be used for Oil Recycling related programs, the City pass a Resolution, and there be one certified center per 100,000 population within the City limits. Block Grant funds are based on per capita (115,900) of the City, at rate $.31 per resident, equating to S35,929.00 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Fifth Cycle of the Used Oil Recycling Block Grant is for three fiscal year allowing most cities the flexibility to carryover unused funds for special projects requiring larger funding. We do not anticipate taking advantage of this option at this time. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been using Block Grant funds since Fiscal Year 1994/95 to support the operation of its Household Hazardous Waste facility, provide promotional materials including videos, newspaper, and radio ads. We have also provided used oil recycling containers to the citizen for safe transportation of used motor oil. CITY COU~'CIL STAFF REPORT USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT March 5, 1997 Page 2 ANALYSIS There are three State certified drop off sites within the City limits of Rancho Cucamonga. A certified drop off site or a curbside used oil collection program is a mandatory part of the Waste Oil Block Grant Program. Without at least one of the preceding items the City is not eligible for grant funds. PROGRAM ANALYSIS The following are the programs staff will propose to the CIWMB for use of the block grant funds: · Continue funding the Used Oil Recycling portion of the operation of the HHW facility and Clean Sweep/BOP program. · Continue television ads on local cable company. · Translate the public service videos into Spanish for showing on the Spanish television channel. · Public education in local high schools science an,el auto shop classrooms. · Develop and distribute a Do It Yourself Used Oil Recycling Kit. Staff is recommending that Council approve the attached Resolution in order to complete the application package. Respectfully submitted, 6_,/' William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:dlw Attachment Esot, u-rzo q '7 - 6) 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act that provides funds to cities and counties for establishing and maintaining local used oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal of used oil; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board) has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary, procedures governing application by cities and counties under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Integrated Waste Management Board require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for the development of the project. NOW, THEREFOKE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. Approve the filing of an application for the California Used Oil Recycling Block Grant Program under the California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act for State assistance for the project specified above; and 2.Certifies that said applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and 3. Appoints the City Engineer as agent of the City, council to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. /4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 97- URGING LOCAL POST OFFICE BRANCHES TO FLY THE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED POW/MIA FLAG Recommendation The City Council approve Resolution No. 97-**'*. Backgroull~! The City of Lomita asked that local municipalities consider passing a Resolution in support of modifying current Federal regulations to allow local Post Offices to display the PIO/MIA flag. Currently it is against Post Office policy to fly any flags other than the United States flag and the Postal Service flag. The attached Resolution supports efforts to modify current Post Ofrice regulation to allow the PIO/MIA flag to be flown at the discretion of each local Post Office. Management Analyst II Attachment: Resolution No. 97-'~'* RESOLUTION NO. 97-"" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING LOCAL POST OFFICE BRANCHES TO FLY THE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED POW/MIA FLAG WHEREAS, Postal Regulation 47 of the Administrative Support Manual provides that the only flags authorized to be flown at post offices are the United States flag and the Postal Service flag; and WHEREAS, there is still over ten-thousand American veterans listed as prisoners of war and/or missing in action; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to showing our respect and gratitude to those Americans who are prisoners of war or who are classified as missing in action; and WHEREAS, the POW/MIA flag has been nationally recognized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION '1: That the current regulation which allows only the United States flag and the Postal Service flag to be displayed be modified to allow local post offices to display, at the discretion of each local post office, the nationally recognized POW/MIA flag; and SECTION 2: That the City Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to Marvin Runyon, Post Master General and Chief Executive Officer of the United States Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Room 10653, Washington, DC, 20260, and to the President of the United States of Amedca, William Clinton, White House, Washington, DC, 20500, and to other cities and concerned organizations, officials and individuals. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Larn, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO SUBMIT TO SANBAG PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN FISCAL YEARS 1998/2005 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Engineering Division to submit to SANBAG the City's projects to be included in Fiscal Years 1998/2005 Regional Transportation Improvement Program. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The 1991 Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) requires a Transportation Improvement Program be developed for the Southern California Association of Government regions. Development of a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (SCAG) is required under the Metropolitan PIarming Rules and Regulations. SCAG develops the RTIP in cooperation with Caltrans, SANBAG, and public transit operators. Local agencies process their projects through SANBAG. SCAG is also required to include a financial plan with its adoption of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), which demonstrates that the region has the capacity to fund its program. SANBAG has requested that each local agency within its jurisdiction have their governing body approve projects for inclusion into the 1998/2005 RTIP. Staff reasonably expects that sufficient revenues will be generated in the next eight years to fund the projects submitted to SANBAG for inclusion into the 1998/2005 RTIP. Projects involving work on Federal or State highways and projects that are regionally significant have been included in the eight-year RTIP Program. Regionally significant projects are those roads that serve regional transportation needs such as access to and from the areaoutside the region, access to retail malls, sports complexes and transportation terminals, etc. Expected development projects within public right-of-way have also been included. Most of these projects currently exist in the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Nlarch 5. 1997 Page 2 1996/2002 RT[P: howc``'cr. SANBAG wants each agency to resubmit existing RTIP projects along with new submittals. A brief description [i3r each project is shown on the attached list. W'hcn the 96/02 RTIP ,,,,'as submittcd in 1995, local agencies were allowed to include projects that might rcasonably expect to receive Federal funding; however, in the submittals tBr the 98/05 RTIP only those projects that have SANBAG Board approval for Federal funding can be listed as being Federally t~nded. At this time, the City has only the Archibald Avenue and Fouah Street Intersection Improvement Project approved by the SANBAG Board. RespectfUlly submitted, WilI'mm J. O'Neil City Engineer Attacgents WJO:MO:sd 1998 TI-IROUGI 1 2005 RTIP projects That Are Nominated To Be lncl uded in The 1998/005 RTI 1:' Project Name Project I,imits I)cscription Fiscal Year Archibald Ave. at Fourth St. Intersection Improvements 97/98 Archibald Ave. at San Bernardino Rd. Traffic Signal 97/98 Archibald Ave. Hillside Rd. to south of Banyan St. Widen ti'om 2 to 3 lanes 00/01 Arrow Rt. Grove to Baker Widen from 2 to 4 lanes 00/01 Arrow Rt. at Baker Ave. Traffic Signal 98/99 Arrow Rt. Milliken Ave. to East Ave. Widen portions from 2 to 4 lanes 00/01 Base Line Rd. at Interstate 15 Trallic Signal 98/99 Carnelian St./Vincyard San Bernardino Rd. to north of Base Line Rehab. l~vmt/Storm Drain &Curve Realigrm~cnt 98/99 Carnelian St. Base lane Rd. to 19th St. Rehab. Pavement & Storm Drain 01/02 Carnelian St. Hillside Rd. to Ahnond St. Widen ti-om 2 to 4 lanes 98/99 l)ecr Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd. to Highland Ave. Construct new roadway (west halo 97/98 Foothill Blvd. at Grove Ave. Widen & traltic signal 00/01 Foothill Blvd. Grove Ave. to Southern Pacitic R.R. Widen ti'om 4 to 6 lanes &median island 01/02 Foothill Blvd. Southern Pacitic I(.R. Widen l~'om 4 to 6 lanes 03/04 l:oothill Blvd. Southern Pacilic R.R. to Lion St. Widen from 4 to 6 lanes &median island 03/04 Foothill Blvd. I,ions to l lehns Ave. Widen li'om 4 to 6 lanes &median island 01/02 1998 'rl IRe 2005 1~'1'11~ g Project Name Project l,imits 1)cscription Fiscal Year Foothill Blvd. l leh-ns Ave. to l laven Ave. Widen from 4 to 6 lanes &median island 01/02 Foothill Blvd. at Archibald Ave. Add right turn lane on N/B Archibald Ave. 00/01 Foothill Blvd. Rochester Ave. to Interstate 15 Widen l~om 4 to 6 lanes &median island 02/03 l:oothill Blvd. Rochester Ave. to Interstate 15 Widen 02/03 Fourth St. I laven to east of Interstate 15 Rehabilitate westbound lanes (north side) 00/01 Fourth St. East of I- 15 to Etiwanda Ave. (westbound) Rehabilitate westbound lanes (north side) 97/98 Grove Ave. 8th St. to San Bernardino Rd. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, upgrade signals &storm 03/04 drain Grove Ave. San Bernardino Rd. to Foothill Blvd. ~ ~ Widen ti-om 2 to 4 lanes & upgrade signals 01/02 Haven Ave. Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. Rehab. pavement 98/99 Haven Ave. Base Line Rd. to State Route 30 Widen west side ti'om 2 to 3 lanes, upgrade signal 99/00 & storm drain l laven Ave.. . Base lane Rd. to State l{oute 30 Rehab. pavement (east side) 99/00 l lavcn Ave. State Route 30 to Wilson Ave. Rehab. pavement 00/01 l lelhnan Ave. at San Bcrnardino Rd. Traflic Signal 98/99 l lelhnan Ave. at Church St. Traffic Signal 98/99 l lcrmosa, Church & Foothill Blvd. to north of 19th St. Widen from 2 to 4 lanes, storm drain & rehab. 04/05 Center Avenues pavcnlcnt 1998 TI IRU 2005 RTII} Page 3 Project Name Project l,imits Description I:isc~fi Ycar Spruce Ave. ~t Terra Vista Ave. Traflc Signal 98/99 l~avemeut l~.esurlhcing Various locations Resurlb. cing ()ngoing Traffic Signal & Various locations Trafic signals & intersection improvements Ongoing Intersection lmprvs. Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Contact Person: Mike Olivier Telephone: (909) 477-2740, Ext. 2311 Local Agency 1998/2005 RTIP FINANCIAL PLAN Project Revenue In $1,000 .... FY 97198 FY 98~99 FY 99~2000 FY 2000/01 FY 2001/02 FY 2002~03 FY 2003~04 FY 2004/05 G_a_s~Ta~x ......... $1,970.00 $1,995.00 _ $2,02_0._00 $2,020.00 $2,020.00 $2,020.00 $2,100.00 $2.100.00 Measure I: Loca, _ $750.00 "T~0b:00 $800.00 $800.00 $800.00' ~5'0.00+'' $850200'$900.00 Arterial $0.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 _$2.400.00 .....$0.00 ........_$0.00 .....~$_0_:_00.$2,500.00 General FUnd_s ..... $140.00 $145.00 .....~50.00 $150.00 $_150.0~0_ $150.00 $160.00 $160.00 TD_AAd~._8 ......................$_0.0__0$0.00 $0~.0_0_ $0.00 $0.00 $6.0~ ~6]00~ $0.00 _Me_JlLo_~gpq~ ....... $o.oo ......$p:go $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo $o.oo_ ___/O~_._~._6L$o.oo Local- RDA $500.00 $1,000.00 $1.000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ~,~;~_'~_~Proje_~t_~_ "~9'~676~ .....$655.00$950.00$1.000.00$1.000.00_$1.200.00 __4!_._290.00$1:500.00 _c..on_struction by _Developers $1.000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,.0_00.0_0. ~$2,000.00 Other Revenue Sources: Goupty Roo_d G_o_n_!r_o.L ......$_o.oo$o.oo __ _ 50.00 .......~$P,0g$o.oo$o.oo$1 oo.oo$5,000.00 _TO~TALS_ ....... _~_"$5~,310_.0_0' $~,,~'9~)%~)6"' $8,320~00 $8.870.00 $6,970.00 $7,220.00 $8,4]b~00 $1_6_.16~.oo CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA · STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 ~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGEEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECU~TY AND O~E~G THE SUM~Y VACATION OF PORTIONS OF THE BE~YL-HELLMAN STO~ D~IN EASEMENTS AND ALSO O~E~G THE ~NE~TION TO L~DSC~E ~TEN~CE DIST~CT NO. 1 AND STEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIST~CT NOS. 1 AND 2 FO~ T~CT MAP 14410, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF BERYL STEET AND SOUTH OF 19TH STEET, SUBMI~ED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 14410, accepting tt'te subject agreement and security, ordering the summary vacation of portions of the BeryI-Hellman Storm Drain Easements and also ordering the annexation to Lm:dscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and tile City Clerk to sign said agreement and cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Map 14410, located on the east side of Beryl Street and south of 19th Street in the Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission of March 27, 1991 for the division of 10 acres into 35 lots. The Developer, Centex Homes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site irnprovcn~ents in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $256,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $128,000.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 4,650.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clcrk's Office. ,. C[T'x' COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 'FFL~XCT 14410 - CENTEX HOMES .Xlarch 5, 1997 Page '~ A condition for approval of the map requires the vacation of the excess portions of tl-u'ee City drainage easements, adjacent to and on the westerly side of the Beryl-Hellman Channel and access road. The subject drainage easements were originally obtained for the channel construction. The original easements included excess areas not now required for the channel and its adjacent access roads. The subject channel project has since been completed and accepted by the Council. It would be appropriate to vacate the excess portions of those easements that are within the boundary of said Tract Map and return the property use to the owners. The remaining easements across Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of said map will consists of a strip of land 20 feet wide, measured from the channel centerline. The westerly half of the existing concrete channel and its westerly access road will be within these remaining 20 foot portions. The subject summary vacations were tbund to conform with the General Plan and are consistent with the Tentative Tract Map as approved by the Planning Commission. Letters of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation fom'~ signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments ,/~PRFJECT LOCATION "' .~,,.--. ST. I ;' ' ,, CHURCH ,,~.. .-"CC'.'.-!LL ~L','D VIGINtTY MAP ~ N CITY OF R_~N'CHO CUCA=viONGA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU.,'NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOI~NIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14410, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY ~v~EREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14410, submitted by Centex Homes, and consisting of 35 35 lots located on the east side of Beryl Street and 360 feet south of 19th Street, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on March 27, 1991, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14410 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Centex as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submirted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to at-test; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 144l 0 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU."NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF THE BERYL- HELLMAN STOR_M DRAIN EASEMENTS LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET AND EAST OF BERYL STREET WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate portions of the Beryl-Hellman Storm Drain Easements hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that portions of the Beryl- Hellman Storm Drain Easements located south of 19th Street and east of Beryl Street are unnecessary, for present or prospective storm drain purposes because those portions of the easements have not been used for the purpose they were dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years immediately proceeding the proposed vacation. NOW, THEEFOE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on Map V-144, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in the legal descriptions which are attached hereto, marked Exhibits "A", "B" and "C", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portions of storm drain easements south of 19th Street and east of Beryl Street no longer constitutes a storm drain easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. EXHIBIT "A" SUMMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF A STORJM DRAIN EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT 2, BLOCK 12, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LAND, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY' RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, NORTH 89°40'15.` EAST 24.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10°52'18'' EAST 55.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 520.0O FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°11'49"AN ARC DISTANCE OF 65.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18°04'04'' EAST 86.31 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 89°40'15'' WEST 76.01 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT 2; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°2g'28'' WEST 200.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"AI"A'I'FACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART THEREOF. CITY OF R.~N'CHO CUCA~'viIONGA / ~ V/\C'.,\'I'I()N ENGINRm{ING DIVISION TIT[~ Map V- 144 SCALE: 1"=60' NORTHEAST 1/4 LOT I b P,O,B l 3,Y z t , N89'40'1,5"E 65g,65' , ~ o dr NORTHEAST o~ d \x\~ ~<( ~JO O z~ ~ 1/4 LOT 2 ~_ o '~l '~ ~.. BER'fi_-HELLMAN ~ co ~ ~ ~: STORM DRAIN CHANNEL ~ z _j bo I '-r ~ 76.01' ' ~ / · ' ' i ,/ '- 659,67' t " S89'40'15"W EAST 1/2 ~F' LOT 2 EASEMENT NOTES (i)THE EASTERLY LINE OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 83-107361 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDED ON MAY 17, 1983. (~PORTION OF EASEMENT (NO. 83-107361) BEING VACATED. EXHIBIT "A-1" EXHIBIT "B" SUNIMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF A STOI~M DRAIN EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 1, BLOCK 12, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LAND, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 89`'40'15" WEST 4O.OO FEET; THENCE NORTH 30"19'45" WEST 382.96 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89'"38'19" EAST 123.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25'"47'10" EAST 205.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05" 59'28" TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 00"29'28" EAST 99.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "E]-I':A'FI'ACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART THEREOF. CITY OF RA~NCt-{O CUC.~uvlONGA ENG G DFvlSXON ~ v-144 i 9TH ST. ,,] NORTHWEST 114 LOT 'I 'qol , o~ LINE OF SOU~2-11/2 OF L0'[ 1 z 3,3' : ,,f NBg'38'19"E . ' r-- -- ,., ,'] / \v 12,3.57' -'- 4x~ 106.88' -~', \ t--: \ q.Ci , ¢ BERYL-HELLMAN (/Q \ ~ ' STORM IRAhN CHANNEL Itl \ '~ $ .,\ r-:. \\"~, ] ~ "'if" O \ ~ \ z°o 1:::, \ ,=, SOUTHEAST 1/4',\LOT I ',,_, o \ z \ A=05 R 48~ 0 \ / \ SCALE: 1"=60' \ \ \ /t NSg'40'lS"W 659.92' P.O.B. S'LY LINE OF LOT 1 EASEMENT NOTES ~THE WESTERLY LINE OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORNI DRAIN PURPOSES, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 83-113227 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDED ON MAY 24, 1983. ~PORTION OF EASEMENT (NO. 83-113227) BEING VACATED. Xnm T jSI EXHIBIT SL~'L%,L42,.Y VACATION OF A PORTION OF A STOR3/I DR-kIN EASENLENT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT 1, BLOCK 12, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LAND, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLO~,VS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAiD LOT 1, NORTH 89"40'15"EAST24.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10°52'18`. WEST 28.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 480.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08" 55'25". AN ARC DISTANCE OF 74.76 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00°29'28.' EAST 99.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND IS SHOVVN ON EXHIBIT"C-I"ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART THEREOF. CZTY OF R_L'N'CZO CUCA3,IO.NGA ~ ~ v A C A T I 0 X / _ k~ h ENGINEERING DIVISION ,'~ V- 144 NSg'-'0'n 5'E 525.5,' -- NOO'29'2e"W 0.27' A =08'55'25' R=~80 CO' T=37, SCALE: 1"=50' t 9TH ST. D~TAIL "A" NTS 2ETAIL "A'~ ~'~ NSS'~O'~S'E S5.6 ' R=480.00'~ '~LY LiNE OF EAST S'LY LINE OF LOT 1 EASE~MENT NOTES ©THE EASTERLY LINE OF AN EASEMENT FOR STORDI DRAIN PURPOSES, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA2MONGA, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 83-275716 OF OFFICIA_L RECORDS RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 22, 1983. ~)PORTION OF EASE~MENT ('NO. 83-275716) BEING VACATED. EXHIBIT "C-1" ESOLUTIONNO. 0 7- ODi A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF tL4.NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 14410 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously tbrmed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on E.'chibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~,4 .z ..... ~ .v C,'/U,qL'/t P,qOP{A'TY '\ "' :, 7_: .' .7. :: :_ '~:j ~t~'z '. I ~0~ ~._.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TF~. EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: TRACT NO. 14410 STREET LIGHTS: NUMBER OF LAMPS Dist. 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L S1 ............... S2 13 ............ LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea. L1 ......... 115 * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units Bv District Parcel DU S 1 S2 L 1 N/A 35 35 . 35 35 Annexation Date: March 5, 1997 Form Date 11/16/94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: .'March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENA2NCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUFFALO AVENUE AND S.&N MARINO STREET, SUBMITFED BY OLT.MANS CONSTRUCTION CO. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Development Review No. 96-21, located at the southeast comer of Buffalo Avenue and San Marino Street ,,,,'as approved on November 6, 1996 for the construction of an industrial building per the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Developer, Oltmans Construction Co., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $115,500.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 57,750.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have ben received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and W'aiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer Attachments WJO:PV:dlw / SAN/~ARINO ST. L~j (D 6TH ST. ca _u " 4TH STREET SITE C SAN BERNARDINO FRWY VICINITY MAP NOr TO SCALE CITY OF FL~N'CHO CUC.~'vIONGA ~ ~~ ~TAFP ,f~PORT / ~ ENGINk'YRRING DIVISION ~ O.R. ~&-Z/ gX,BTR1T: / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU.'NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR2NIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE~MENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 5, 1997, by Oltmans Construction Co., A California Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast comer of Buffalo Avenue and San Marino Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property, as referred to to as Development Review No. 96-21; and ; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security,, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: I. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to exec,ute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. SO UTIOX No. d'7- C D G A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COD.'NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANLNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STPdEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-21 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously ~tbrmed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (herdnafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and ;VHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property. described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and ',VHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their ~,~,ritten consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,,-~MONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Ex.hibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 E~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO S. 1 AND 6 ,,, ROUTE ARROW SAN/I~ARINO ST. ::> < 6TH ST. Z --J O " 4TH STREET ::::) er" 'T' (2~ sAN BERNARDINO FRWY VICINITY MAP NOr TO SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~.R. ~c,,-Z~" EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGFL~kM PROJECT: D.R. 96-21 STREET LIGHTS: NUMBER OF LAMPS Dist. 5800L 9500L 16.000L 22,000L 27,500L S1 ............... S6 --- 7 ......... LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Dist. D.G.S.F. S.F. S.F. Ea. L3B ' ' ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units Bv District Parcel Acres S I S62 L3B N/A 9.24 18.48 9.24 9.24 Annexation Date:(March 5, 1997) Form Date 11/16/94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City, Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO AWARD BALANCE OF TERNI OF JANITORIAL AGREEMENT TO JANITORIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. OF TUSTIN, CA. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the award of the remaining term for the current Janitorial Services Agreement to Janitorial Technology, of Tustin California. The balance of the current term is until July 1, 1997. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In December of 1996, pursuant to bids, and a subsequent review process, the City awarded the agreement for Janitorial Services to the current contractor, Merchants Building Maintenance. Over the last few months the service levels have been increasingly deficient, although aggessive measures have been taken to assist Merchants with the successful performance of the contract. It is apparent from periodic inspections and extensive documentation that Merchants is unable to perform at the levels specified in the agreement, and therefore the recommendation is to replace them with the next qualified proposer from the last bid process, Janitorial Technology, Inc.. They are capable of assuming the remaining four months of the current agreement, and have agreed to honor the previous bid price which was $214.00 higher per month than Merchants bid. Amounts equal to this increase have been deducted from the existing contract with Merchants for deficiencies; therefore there will be no fiscal impact from this recommendation. The City Attorney has reviewed this item and concurs with the recommendation. A bid summary from the last process is attached for reference. We anticipate rebidding this project in July of this year. Respectfully Submitted, William..~,Nei~/'~'( ~ City Engineer WJO:DC:jau Attachment ,- / BID SUMMARY Janitorial Service Contracts Triad 124,044 30,216 9,576 19,968 14,976 5,736 1,824 206,340 31,464 Merchants 58,544 15,000 6,948 10,320 6,708 3,000 2,400 102,920 15,972 I 18,892 Excc Fac Svcs 64,800 16,968 10,104 13,104 13,416 2,904 1,224 122,520 21,(~96 l~togan 90,818 30,252 17,941 21,135 15,274 4,470 1,599 181,489 26,491 Bolin I 14,780 36,624 5,832 15,276 12,528 2, 184 1,692 188,916 24,480 Sterling 63,462 19,814 6,600 13,149 10,020 2,304 1,416 116,765 20,004 Soc Voc Svcs 0 0 0 0 0 13,680 4,320 18,000 10,92 I (I~ESCIN!)ED BID) Jan Tcch 59,883 16,620 5,340 11,580 9,660 2,196 1,860 107,139 14,325 121,4(~,1 ABM 52,170 16,151 3,201 8,463 6,493 1,966 901 89,345 11,624 100,969 Sweets 97, 164 72,300 14,400 22,200 22,200 3,300 2,580 234, 144 37,992 All Points 80,640 26,520 6,660 19,200 9,960 1,920 1,020 145,920 19,740 i~oy-'tl Bros 79,188 15,078 7,176 12,298 10,920 7,322 1,872 133,854 17,892 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5. !997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. E g'neer-Z.-,2 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACTS 13565-5 THROUGH 13565-10, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUMMIT AND WADMAN BULLOCK, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION RECO~IMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution, accepting the subject agreement and security extension and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKG ROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13565-5 through 13565-10 '."'ere approved by the City Council on March 20. 1995, in the follo~ving amounts: Tract 13565-6 Faithful Performance Bond: $427,000.00 Tract 13565-7 Faithful Performance Bond: S 149,000.00 Tract 13565-8 Faithful Performance Bond: $292,000.00 Tract 13565-9 Faithful Performance Bond: $174.000.00 Tract 13565-10 Faithful Performance Bond: S 93.000.00 Tract 13565-5 to -10 Faithful Performance Bond: S757.000.00 Tract 13565-5 to -10 Faithful Performance Bond: S488,000.00 The developer, Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement due to the economic situation. Copies of the Improvement Agreement and Securities Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. eft City Engineer WJO:LPd3:Is ESOt, UT ON C? 7-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU.'NCIL OF THE CITY OF FL, kNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TFL4.CTS 13565-5 THROUGH 13565-10 WHEREAS, the City. Council of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has tbr its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on February 10, 1997, by The Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property. specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Summit and Wardman Bullock; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereot% is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tracts 13565-5 through 13565-10; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. and the City Clerk to arrest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: .March 5. 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP. Citv Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beck. Jr. Engineer,~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE LETTER ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATER/AL BOND RECEIVED FROM THE RA. NCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ,,-~ND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR DR 94-04, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF OLD TO~&,'N PARK RECONI}IENDATION The required street improvements for DR 94-04 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the letter from Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency accepting responsibility for the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 94-04 Located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Old Town Park Developer: Prairie Pacific Investments/North Town Housing Partners 7201 Haven Avenue, ;~E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Release: Release the letter from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency accepting responsibility t~3r the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds Respectfully submirted, W i t I i a m'~~O"Ne(~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls k,, / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU~'CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 94-04. LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WqEST OF OLD TOWN PARK, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of improvements tbr DR 94-04, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Old Town Park, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City. Council of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING A NEW SECTION 17.02.600 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL PARTIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND UPON PROPERTY UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL USES (NONCONFORMING USE). A. Recitals. 1. On December 11, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 96-72, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On February 19, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. OrdinanCe. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Section 3. A new Section 17.02.600 hereby is added to Chapter 17.02 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 17.02.600 CQmmercial Parties Prohibited in all ReSidential Zones and ProDerlgy used for ReSidential Purposes. A. Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council by the adoption of this section to prohibit parties conducted in a commercial manner within all residential zones and upon any property within the City actually utilized for residential purposes not withstanding the zoning category thereof (nonconforming uses) in order to preserve the rights of residents to the quiet enjoyment of their property. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 19, 1997 Page 2 B. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings set forth herein: 1. "Admission charge" means a tangible benefit, monetary or otherwise, which is expressly or implicitly required as a condition of admittance to a party. Customary courtesies and clearly noncommercial activity such as gifts by guests and voluntary sharing of expenses for meals shall not be considered to be an "admission charge." "Admission charge" shall not include donations for political, community service, charitable, or religious purposes. 2. "Party" means three or more persons meeting together for social, recreational, or amusement purposes. C. Admission Charge Prohibited. No person or group of persons shall require, implicitly or expressly, any admission charge to any party conducted in any residential zone or upon any property within the City actually utilized for residential purposes notwithstanding the zoning category thereof (nonconforming uses). Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. Section 5. Penalties for violation of Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 19, 1997 Page 3 corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Ordinance. Section 6. Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 7. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. .~' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.26 THERETO AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is receiving applications to construct wireless communication facilities in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Currently, the City lacks comprehensive regulations and standards applicable to such facilities. 2. Establishing regulations and standards applicable to construction and operation of wireless communication facilities will serve to reduce the potential for negative impacts on the community presented by such facilities. 3. Failure to implement wireless communications regulations will likely result in a substantial number of wireless communications facilities being installed without protective measures necessary to the public safety or welfare, and without standards necessary to the proper consideration of applications before the City. 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning this Ordinance and has recommended adoption thereof. 5. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of this Ordinance. 6. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and ordain as follows: Section 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. Section 2: The provisions of this Ordinance set forth herein have been reviewed and considered by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder and, further, said Council finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that said provisions are therefore exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061 (b)(3) of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Section 3: Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is amended by the addition of a new Chapter 17.26 to read, in words and figures, as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 2 Chapter 17.26 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Sections: 17.26.010 Purpose. 17.26.020 Definitions. 17.26.030 Development criteria for all wireless communications facilities. 17.26.040 Approval of minor wireless communications facilities. 17.26.050 Approval of major wireless communications facilities. 17.26.060 Height criteria for major wireless communications facilities. 17.26.070 Conditional use permit required. 17.26.080 Variance. 17.26,090 Revocation. 17.26.100 Abandonment. 17.26.010 Purpose. The purpose of these regulations and guidelines is to regulate the establishment of wireless communication facilities and thereby protect the public health, safety, general welfare, and quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga, while preserving the rights of wireless communications providers. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found and determined that these regulations and guidelines for wireless communication facilities are necessary to attain these goals. These regulations are intended to supersede applicable provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code pertaining to communication facilities, and to establish flexible guidelines for the governance of wireless communication facilities which recognize the unique land use distribution, topography, and aesthetic characteristics of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Wireless communications facilities are prohibited in the City of Rancho Cucamonga except as otherwise provided herein. 17.26.020 DefinitiOnS. Unless otherwise stated, the following definitions pertain to this Ordinance: "Antenna" means a device used in wireless communications which radiates and/or receives commercial cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio signals. "Antenna" shall not include any satellite dish antenna or any antenna utilized for amateur radio, citizens band radio, television, AM/FM, or shortwave radio reception purposes. "Building-Mounted" means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a building, or to the side of another structure such as a water tank, church steeple, freestanding sign, or similar structure, but not to include the roof of any structure. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 3 "Cellular" means an analog or digital wireless communication technology that is based on a system of interconnected neighboring cell sites. "Co-located" means the locating of wireless communications equipment from more than one provider on a single wireless communication facility. "Ground-Mounted" means mounted to a pole, monopole, tower, or other freestanding structure specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting an antenna. "Major Wireless Communication Facility" means a wireless communication facility that is ground- or roof-mounted or mounted in or on any public property including the public right-of-way. "Minor Wireless Communication Facility" means a wireless communication facility that is building-, facade-, or wall-mounted and does not exceed the height of the parapet wall or roof line of the building. A roof- mounted facility which is screened by a solid material on all four sides and does not exceed the maximum height of the district shall be considered a minor wireless communication facility. "Monopole" means a structure composed of a single spire, pole, or tower used to support antennas or related equipment. "Mounted" means attached or supported. "Personal Communication Service" means digital low-power, high- frequency commercial wireless radio communication technology that has the capacity for multiple communications services and the routing of calls to individuals, regardless of location. "Roof-Mounted" means mounted above the eave line of a building. "Stealth Facility" means any communication facility which is designed to blend into the surrounding environment, typically one that is architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, and shall include and mean any concealed antenna. "Wireless Communication Facility" means a facility consisting of any commercial antenna, monopole, microwave dish, and/or other related equipment necessary to the transmission and/or reception of cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio communications, and which has been granted a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, or a Wireless Registration Number by the California Public Utilities Commission, or otherwise provides wireless communications services to the public. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 4 17.26.030 Development criteria for all wireless Communication facilities. A. Screening and Site Selection Guidelines. 1. Stealth facilities and concealed antennas are preferred. 2. Wireless communications facilities shall be located where the existing topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening. Where insufficient screening exists, applicants shall provide screening satisfactory to the City Planner, or as otherwise required herein. 3. Ground-mounted wireless communication facilities shall be located only in close proximity to existing above-ground utilities, such as electrical tower or utility poles (which are not scheduled for removal or undergrounding for at least 18 months after the date of application), light poles, trees of comparable heights, and in areas where they will not detract from the appearance of the City. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the following order of preference: a. Co-located with other major wireless communication facilities. b. On existing structures such as buildings, communication towers, or utility facilities. c. On existing signal, power, light, or similar kinds of poles. d. In industrial districts. e. In commercial districts. f. In residential districts (minor wireless communications facilities only. 5. Major wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within 500 feet of any residential structure, within any residential district, or within 500 feet of any existing, legally established major wireless communication facility except when co-located on the same building, structure, or wireless facility. For the purposes of this section, all distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening structures, from the nearest point of the proposed major wireless communication facility to the nearest property line of any residential land use, or to the nearest point of another major wireless communication facility. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 5 B. Development Requirements. 1. As part of the application process, applicants for wireless communication facilities shall be required to provide written documentation demonstrating good faith efforts in locating facilities in accordance with the Site Selection Guidelines (order of preference). 2. Wireless communication facilities shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, warning, or other required seals or legally required signage. 3. All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless communication facility shall be located within a building, enclosure, or underground vault that complies with the development standards of the district in which the accessory equipment is located, subject to City approval. If the equipment is permitted to be located above ground, it shall be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and include sufficient landscaping to screen the structure from view. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be subdued colors and non-reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials and colors. 5. All screening for building-mounted facilities shall be compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture, and/or materials of the building. 6. Monopoles and antennas shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional dimensions than is necessary for the proper functioning of the wireless communications facility. The applicant shall provide documentation satisfactory to the City Planner establishing compliance with this subsection. 17.26.040 ADDrOYal Of minor wireless COmmUniCatiOn facilities, Minor wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner pursuant to Section 17.06.020 Minor Development Review procedures of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. In considering applications for minor wireless communication facilities, the City Planner shall be guided by both the provisions of Section 17,06.020 and this Ordinance, However, in the event of any inconsistency in said standards, the provisions of this Ordinance shall govern. The decision of the City Planner shall be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.020.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26,050 ADDrOyal Of maior wireless COmmunication faCilitiq~. Major wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. In considering applications for major wireless communications facilities, the Planning Commission shall be guided by the CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 ~ CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 6 provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and this Ordinance. However, in the event of any inconsistencies in said standards, the provisions of this Ordinance shall govern. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless appealed in writing within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.02.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.060 Height criteria for major wireless communications facilities. No wireless communications facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable distdct unless the facility is utilized by two or more wireless communication providers pursuant to a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission may consider approval of facilities proposed to exceed the maximum height limit subject to the review and approval of a conditional use permit application pursuant to Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.070 Conditional use permit rec~uired. Each major wireless communication facility for which an application is made during the term of this Ordinance must first receive final approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. As a condition of issuance of a conditional use permit for a facility utilizing the public right-of-way, an applicant may be required to enter into a franchise agreement with the City. 17.26.0~0 Variance. Any person may apply for a variance as to the requirements set forth herein pursuant to Section 17.04.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 17.26.090 Revocation. Any approval granted pursuant to this Ordinance may, after notice and hearing, be terminated for violation of any provisions of this Ordinance or any other applicable laws, or for fraud or misrepresentation in the application process. 17.26.100 Abandonment. A. A wireless communication facility is considered abandoned and shall be promptly removed as provided herein if it ceases to provide wireless communication services for 180 or more days. Such removal shall be in accordance with proper health and safety requirements and all ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City. B. A written notice of the determination of abandonment shall be sent by first class mail, or personally delivered, to the operator of the wireless communication facility at said operator's business address on file with the City. The operator shall remove all facilities within 30 days of the date of such notice unless, within 10 business day of the date of said notice, the operator appeals such determination, in writing, to the Planning Commission. The City Planner shall schedule a hearing on the matter to be CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19.1997 Page 7 conducted before the Planning Commission at which time the operator may present any relevant evidence on the issue of abandonment. The Planning Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify with or without conditions the original determination of abandonment and shall make written findings in support of its decision. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final. C. Any wireless communications facility determined to be abandoned and not removed within the 30 day period from the date of notice, or where an appeal has been timely filed, within such time as prescribed by the Planning Commission following its final determination of abandonment, shall be in violation of this Ordinance, and the operator of such facility shall be subject to the penalties prescribed herein. Facilities determined to be abandoned and not removed within the time limits prescribed herein hereby are deemed to be a nuisance and, alternative to the procedure described above, may be abated as a nuisance in any manner provided by law. Section 4: Except as provided herein, the provisions of this Ordinance shall preempt and supersede any and all inconsistent provisions contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section 5: A. All wireless communications facilities for which applications have been approved by the City and/or building permits have been issued on or prior to the adoption of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the regulations and guidelines contained herein, unless subsection B applies. B. All wireless communication facilities for which building permits have expired, and have not been renewed on or prior to the adoption date of this Ordinance, shall be required to comply with the regulations and guidelines contained herein. C. All wireless communication facilities for which submitted applications were determined complete by the Planning Department on or prior to the adoption date of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the regulations and guidelines contained herein. D. All wireless communication facilities for which applications were received by the Planning Department following the effective date of this Ordinance shall be required to comply with the regulations and guidelines contained herein. Section 6: Penalties for violation. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 96-04 - CITY OF R.C. February 19, 1997 Page 8 be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided in this Ordinance. SeCtion 7: Civil remedies available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 8: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SectiOn 9: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF RKPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Member of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad BulleL City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: GONSlDEFtATION OF AN APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRAGT 15166 - MARK TAYLOR ING. - An appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve a request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium Subdivision Map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoria Planned Community and consideration of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-091-14 and 15, and 227-111-12 and 13. Staff has prepared a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 96-13. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval. PROPERTY HISTORY 1981 City's first full General Plan designated property for Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Environmental Impact Report certified. 1981 Victoda Community Plan designated property for Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Environmental Impact Report certified. 1991 City Council adopted Ordinance 470 changing land use to ivledium Residential (8-14 dwelling unit per acre). 1991 City Council adopted Ordinance 465 modifying multi-family development standards. 1996 Mark Taylor submitted application for project at 11.9 dwelling units per acre. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 2 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Two neighborhood meetings were conducted by the developer to explain their project and receive community input on October 1 and December 10, 1996. At both meetings, area residents expressed their opposition to the project, primarily based upon concerns for school impact, traffic impact, and crime. ENVIRONMENTAL Copies of all environmental documents were previously transmitted to the Council. The attached Planning Commission staff report addresses environmental issues. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily BUlletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within an expanded area beyond the usual 300 foot radius of the project site, including those residents who attended either neighborhood meeting and those who testified at the November 13, 1996 public hearing. Throughout the life of this project staff has received numerous calls and visits from area residents opposed to the project. A petition in opposition was filed with the Planning Commission at their January 8, 1997 hearing. Over 470 persons signed the petition (a copy of a sample page is attached). Respectf ' , er ner BB:DC/mlg Attachments: Exhibit"A" Appeal Exhibit "B" Petition Excerpt Exhibit "C" Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 8, 1997 Exhibit "D" Planning Commission Minutes dated January 8, 1997 Resolution Nos. 97-01 and 97-02 Approving VTT 15766 Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA lVIEi IORANDUM RECEIVED J~N 1 ~. j99Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~O~IGA hATE: January 13, 1997 '.%~. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk FROM: Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember SUBJECT: FILING OF APPEAL On January 8, 1997, the Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Tract 15766. I would hereby request that this matter be appealed on the basis this project has created substantial public controversy which should be reviewed by the City Council. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which ar~ already overcrowded) and feel that the issues oftraf~c congestion, crime, declimng property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: January 8, 1997 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR INC.- A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoria Planned Community and consideration of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. APN: 227-091-14 and 15, and 227-111-12 and 13. Staff has prepared a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 96-13. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from November 13, 1996, by the Planning Commission in order for the developer to meet with area residents and explain the proposed project. LAND USE HISTORY: The 1981 General Plan Land Use Plan designated the property for Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). The Victoria Community Plan, also adopted in 1981, designated the property Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) consistent with its stated goal to provide a wide variety of housing types at various densities "that local employees, present and future, will be able to afford and will want to buy." In 1991, the City Council conducted a city-wide review of land planned for multi-family housing. At the conclusion of their review, the Council changed the land use on this property to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), The applicant is proposing a density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre consistent with the General Plan and the Victoria Community Plan. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: A second meeting with area residents was conducted by the developer on December 10, 1996. A total of 187 invitations were mailed, including all persons who testified at the first Planning Commission public hearing. Approximately 50 residents attended the neighborhood meeting. Residents stated their opposition to apartments based upon concerns for school impacts, traffic, and crime. The developer provided a handout (Exhibit "C") which included a project summary of the crime-mitigating design features and an analysis of student generation as compared to three existing apartment projects. Staff distributed copies of the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Plan. See attached copy of article from Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Exhibit "B"). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. January 8, 1997 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was readvertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners in an expanded area beyond the usual 300 foot radius of the project site, plus those residents who attended either neighborhood meeting and those who testified at the November 13, 1996, public hearing. RE(;;OMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project, and related Tree Removal Permit, through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, er BB:DCIjfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report dated November 13, 1996 Exhibit "B" - Article from Inland Valley/Daily Bulletin Exhibit "C" - Handout from Neighborflood Meeting Resolution of Approval for VTT 15576 Resolution of Approval for the DR of VTT 15576 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: November 13.1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTIN(~ TI~NTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR INC - A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoria Planned Community and consideration of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. APN: 227-091-14, 15, and 227-111-12, 13. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 96-13 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 11.9 dwelling units per acre. B. Surroundinc~ Land Use and Zoning: North - Former rail line and single family residential; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Winery; High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) East - Apartments and shopping center; Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Village Commercial West - Mini-storage; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per.acre) North Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) East Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) West Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is an abandoned vineyard. The row of trees along the northerly boundary is primarily a Eucalyptus windrow. The land slopes from north to south at a 3-4 percent grade. ft.,,\ j , ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR November 13, 1996 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Reeuired Provided 96 Apartments 1 bedroom 1.5/unit 144 120 Apartments 2 bedroom 1.8/unit 216 48 Apartments 3 bedroom 2.0/unit 96 Guest Parking N/A .25/unit 66 TOTAL 522 647 RV Parking NA .20/unit 53 53 BACKGROUND: The applicant first appeared before the Planning Commission on January 24, 1996, for a use determination (see minutes attached as Exhibit "J"). The issue was whether the Victoria Community Plan allows apartments. The Plan allows "single family dwellings - attached or detached, including, but not limited to townhouses, triplexes, fourplexes, and condominiums." The consensus of the Commission was that the applicant could proceed by filing a condominium map. The Planning Commission conducted a Pre-Application Review of the initial design concepts on February 14, 1996. Commissioners expressed design concems with architecture, density, size of open space areas, and the use of a single trash compactor in lieu of individual trash enclosures conveniently located throughout the project. The minutes of this meeting are attached (see Exhibit "K"). ANALYSIS: A. Gentrill: The applicant is proposing to build 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartments surrounding a central open space system featuring an exercise building, large open lawn areas, tot lots, and barbeque facilities. The project will be secured with a gated entry system and architecturally designed guardhouses and porte cocheres, as well as the Victoria theme walls. Access to the project will be provided from Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue (a new cul-de-sac street). B. DeSign Review COmmittee: The Committee (Macias, Tolstoy, Fong) reviewed the project on October 15, 1996, and recommended changes. The applicant submitted revised plans addressing the Committee's recommendations, including architectural enhancements and providing eight trash enclosures throughout the project. The revised project was reviewed by the Committee (Macias, McNiel, Fong) on November 5, 1996, and recommended for approval subject to minor revisions. The recommendations are listed in the attached Design Review Committee minutes (see Exhibit "H"). All of the Committee's November 5 recommendations have been included as conditions of approval. During the Pre-Application Review, some Commissioners expressed the desire for a Victorian style of architecture to blend with the style used on the two projects on either side along Base Line Road. The Design Review Committee felt that the proposed Mediterranean style of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR November 13, 1996 Page 3 architecture (stucco with tile roofs) was consistent with the neighborhood. The Committee noted that the adjoining Crescent Heights apartments were Mediterranean style, as were many of the single family homes to the north. C, TechniCal Review & Gradinq Committee: The Technical Review and Grading Committees reviewed the project on October 16 and October 22, 1996, respectively. The Committees determined that the project design, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. D. Environmental AsseSsment: Staff has completed the Initial Study Part II (see Exhibit "1"). Staff relied, in part, upon earlier analyses, including the Victoria Planned Community Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the City's General Plan EIR, and the Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 Update of the General Plan. In addition, traffic impact analysis, acoustical analysis, and arborist reports were prepared for the project. Staff identified the following potential impacts: Schools - The project will generate students at all grade levels. Both affected school districts have indicated current impaction problems and have asked the developer to participate in the Chaffey Joint Union High School District's Mello-Roos District and pay school fees to the Etiwanda School Distdct to fund needed school facilities. Therefore, the impact is considered to be reduced to a level of not significant. Water - The project will reduce absorption rate and increase the amount of surface water runoff due to buildings and paving. As a mitigation, the developer will construct a private drainage system to connect with an extension to the existing storm drain across the entire Base Line Road frontage and remove the existing interim storm drains across Base Line Road. P/ant Life - The project will remove a row of 18 trees along the northerly boundary. As a mitigation, the developer will replant the row of trees with a more appropriate Eucalyptus variety to maintain the windrow character. Noise - The project is exposed to traffic noise levels along Base Line Road which are estimated to exceed City standards. The project design includes 7-foot high sound walls. As a mitigation, the developer will also construct 6-foot sound barriers for second floor balconies. In addition, special glazing and construction techniques will be required to attain acceptable interior noise levels. Traffic - The project will increase traffic on Base Line Road. The project design includes construction of full street improvements on the northerly side of Base Line Road, As a mitigation, the developer will be required to incorporate specific design features into the street improvements and pay transportation development fees as their fair share contribution for area-wide "backbone" street improvements. Public Services - The project will increase demands for fire and emergency medical services. As a mitigation, the developer will be subject to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for fire protection. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR November 13, 1996 Page 4 These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the conditions of approval. The developer has agreed to these mitigations. If the Planning Commission concurs with staff's recommendations, then issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: The public hearing was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily BUlletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners in an expanded area beyond the usual 300-foot radius (see attached Exhibit "A"), including those residents who attended the neighborhood meeting on October 1, 1996. Ten residents participated in the meeting and expressed concerns with traffic impacts, school impacts, environmental impacts, and the impact upon views for existing residents. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project, and related tree removal permit, through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration, ~erY~ City Planner BB:DC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map & Notification Boundary Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Landscaping Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit"G"- Elevations Exhibit "H" - Design Review Committee Minutes Exhibit "1" - Initial Study Part II Exhibit "J" - Minutes of January 24, 1996, Use Determination 96-01 Exhibit "K" - Minutes of February 14, 1996, Pre-Application Review 96-13 Resolutions of Approval with Conditions It/13/~ ~0 Ir/~31~G, "P' _C--'FSUMMARY . ~X15"TFNC-:~----I~_'.~MED UM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ""~NIY ~~: '. ~ ~ TOTAL ~ OF UNITS: "' 1 BEDROOM ,]j 96 2 BEDROOM : ] 120 3 BED~_OM .... * 48 ....... . ,~.; TOTAL UNITS THIS BROJ~T: 264 PARKING ANALYSIS: UNIT ~PE: PARKING REOUIRED: TOTAL/~PE RIO'D: t BEDROOM UNITS 1.5, SPACES/UNIT 1 2 BEDROOM UNITS 1.8 SPACES/UNIT 216 5 BEDROOM UNITS 2 SPACES/UNIT 96 GUEST PARKING 25% of UNITS 66 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 522 of that, GARAGES REQUIRED: 156 of that, CARPORTS REQUIRED: 156 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 6~7 of that, GARAGES PROVIDED: 156 of that, CARPORTS PROVIDED: 156 of that, RV PARKING PROVIDED: 53 ACCESSIBLE SPACES: ~ I 8 LOT DENSI~: fGROSS LOT AR~: 22.2 ACRES N~ LOT DENSI~: 11.9 DU/ACRES OPEN SPACE CALCU~TION: ACRES/SQ.R. % OF N~ BUILDING COVERAGE: 3.0 1 ~NDSCAPE COVERAGE: 11.9 56.9% VEHICU~R AR~: 5.8 27,7% COMMON OPEN SPACE: 17.7 84,7% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: 0,2 1,0~ USABLE OPEN SPACE: 17,9 85.6% (COMMON AND PRIVATE) D-E 74 ,., ......... """' ""~.~ll !~ ! : :'i~iii::i I[s [' ,l ......, ii!:::,. :.,[~o"~~' _ ':: , ~ ~:~ 4 ~"~ ~[ I I I I ] I I2% ~ , ! I ~ , i ~ ,, , .f ' i ~ , I x l ~ 3 / q Q, '~ ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:30 p.m. Dan Coleman October 15, 1996 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR - A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone, located in the Victoria Planned Community on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-091-14 and 15 and 227-111-12 and 13. Design Parameters: The site is an abandoned vineyard and slopes from north to south at a 3 percent grade. There is row of trees along the northerly boundary, primarily Eucalyptus. There are no known cultural resources on the site. To the west is a mini-storage facility, to the east is an apartment project and an undeveloped phase of the Victoria Village shopping center site, to the north is an abandoned railroad line, and to the south is a winery. The project is proposed as a gated community. Pre-Application Review: This project was the subject of a Pre-Application Review by the Planning Commission on February 14, 1996. Commissioners expressed design concerns with architecture, density, size of open space areas, and lack of trash enclosures conveniently located throughout the project. Minutes of the meeting are attached. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Density - The project has been designed at 11.9 dwelling units per acre. The Commission has traditionally required exceptional design quality for projects desiring to build at the upper end of the density range. During the Pre-Application Review, density was raised as an issue as it relates to the design of open space areas and the space between buildings. The project has been redesigned to meet or exceed all City standards for open space and building separations. The project density is lower than the density of the apartment project to the east (15.9 dwelling units per acre). 2. Architectural Style - Commissioners expressed concern that the proposed style was out of character with the surrounding neighborhood, most notably the Victorian architecture of the adjoining shopping center. The projecrs contemporary stucco scheme is similar to the existing apartments to the east; however, the primary concern is the context along Base Line Road. 3. Garages - The long garage buildings should be revised to break-up the long roof line. Suggestions would include varying the roof height or adding intersecting gables. Also, garage door patterns should be varied. 4. Carports - Their basic "stick-like" appearance is contrary to the City's design guidelines for multi-family projects. Substantial design elements should be incorporated, such as tile roof treatment similar to garage buildings and solid end walls. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the - Committee v~l~ discuss the following secondan/design issues. H' i It:t3. DRC COMMENTS VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR October 15, 1996 Page 3 1. Balconies - For the five buildings along Base Line Road, the acoustical study recommends a 6-foot high sound wall for all balconies facing the street. Suggest this be accomplished by using Lexan panel extensions above the normal patio wall height to achieve the necessary sound attenuation. . 2. Open Space - Staff believes the open space layout is superior to most multi-family projects in terms of size and relationship to units. A total of 58 percent of the site is in common and private open space compared to the City's standard of 40 percent. The open space has been arranged as a large 'X' shaped greenbelt which allows 30 out of 35 buildings to orient directly onto the central common areas. 3. Recreational Am_enities - The recreational amenities exceed City standards. 4. Colors - Provide color variation between buildings to avoid monotony. All buildings are proposed with the same color scheme: same roof tile, a single wall color (off white) and two accent colors (teal and rust). 5. Landscaping - Should existing windrow be preserved or replaced? The Victoria Community Plan states that windrow style planrings are "crucial to the Plan" to provide a strong visual unifying element. The applicant proposes to remove the existing row of trees along the north boundary. Most of the trees are in good health; however, preservation in place would require that the grading plan would have to be revised to maintain the natural grades underneath the drip line of the trees. Staff recommends replanting a Eucalyptus windrow along the north project boundary. Suggest Eucalyptus Maculat~ (Spotted Gum) spaced 8-10 feet on center. 6. Trash Compactor- The project features a single point of collection for all trash at the north project boundary. During the Pre-Application Review, one Commissioner expressed concern that this was inconvenient and required tenants to walk too far carrying their trash or to drive to the compactor. Only 6 out of 35 buildings are within 300 feet of the compactor. 7. Stairways - The open stairways lack any architectural treatment. Stairs should be integrated into the building by enclosing them with walls. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redosigned and returned for review by the Design Review Committee. DRC COMMENTS VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR October 15, 1996 Page 4 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Rich Macias, Peter Tolstoy, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Dan Coleman The Committee recommended that the applicant's architect work with staff to revise the project to address the design issues and return to Design Review Committee on November 5, 1996. 1. Architectural Style - The Committee supported the Mediterranean style subject to refinements: a. Provide vTvindow surrounds. b. Provide architectural treatment to blank wall areas such as the Bldg. 2A side elevation. c. Stairways - Study alternative designs with solid decorative walls. Areas beneath stairs may be enclosed for storage. d. Colors - Study alternative color schemes to provide color variations. Suggested that a subtle color change be used as accents on popout elements or between buildings. 2. Garages - Break-up long roof line with intersecting gables or varying roof height. Vary garage door patterns. 3. Carports - Completely redesign to match quality of apartment buildings and garages by incorporating tile roof elements and end walls. The Committee supported the concept of enclosing the ends with storage units. 4. Recreational Amenities - One of the three tot lots may be converted to open space. One possibility is to provide a smaller tot lot adjoining the pool area. 5. Landscaping - Remove and replace existing windrow with more appropriate tree species. 6. Trash Compactor- Provide at least four trash enclosure locations throughout the project for the convenience of residents. The Committee also requested floor plans. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:00 p.m. Dan Coleman November 5, 1996 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR - A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone located in the Victoria Planned Commtmity on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. APN: 227-091-14, 15, and 227-111-12, 13. The Committee recommended that the applicant's architect work with staff to revise the project to address the design issues and return to Design Review Committee on November 5, 1996. 1. Architectural Style - The Committee supported the Mediterranean style subject to refinements: a. Provide window surrounds. b. Provide architectural treatment to blank wall areas such as the Bldg. 2A side elevation. c. Stairways - Study altemative designs with solid decorative walls. Areas beneath stairs may be enclosed for storage. d. Colors - Study alternative color schemes to provide color variations. Suggested that a subtle color change be used as accents on popout elements or between buildings. 2. Garages - Break-up long roof line with intersecting gables or varying roof height. Vary garage door pattems. 3. Carports - Completely redesign to match quality of apartment buildings and garages by incorporating tile roof elements and end walls. The Committee supported the concept of enclosing the ends with storage units. 4. Recreational Arnenities - One of the three tot lots may be convened to open space. One possibility is to provide a smaller tot lot adjoining the pool area. 5. Landscaping - Remove and replace existing windrow with more appropriate tree species. 6. Trash Compactor - Provide at least four trash enclosure locations throughout the project for the convenience of residents. The Committee also requested floor plans. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval subject to: 1. Provide decorative cap (i.e., stucco over) on the stairways. 2. Use heavy duty wood lattice, instead of vinyl lattice panels, at the ends of carports or enclose with solid walls. 3. Provide layered wood fascia detail, instead of flat metal, on carports to match apartments and garage structures. 4. Project will be conditioned to provide at least four trash enclosure locations throughout the site. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff PliT~Dan Colemanl] DRC AGENDA VTT 15766-MARK TAYLOR November 5, 1996 Page 2 The Committee recommended approval subject to the following revisions: 1. Provide decorative cap (i.e., stucco over) on stairways to match patio wall cap. 2. Replace vinyl lattice on carport ends with 2"-3" metal tubing espalier. 3. Carport fascia profile and texture to match apartments. 4. Vary garage door pattern. 5. Replace wood lattice on Building 2A with 2"-3" metal tubing espalier. 6. . Add window on right-hand side of first floor of Building 2B. 7. The alternative color samples were accepted. The applicant should revise the plans accordingly prior to the Planning Commission hearing. City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for pubtic review in accordance with the California Environmental Qua~ty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Vesting Tentataive Tract Map 15766 Public Review Period Closes: Novernber13,1996 Project Name: San Vineyard Project Applicant: Mark-Taylor, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): North side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane- APN: 227-091-14, 15, and 227-111-12, 13. Project Description: A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoria Planned Community and consideration of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: I'] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By EXHIBIT 'T' 'I:\FINAL\CEQA\INSTUDY.PT2 (July 17.1996) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM ONGA jNVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1) Project File #/Name: Z'/TT' 2) Related Files: ~ ~~ ~___ 3) Applicant: ~'(f 'Z, ?>~~~/~/ Telephone 4) Project Description: ~ 5) Project Accepted as Complete (date): ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for ~1 "Yes" and "Maybe" answers on attached sheets, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects ,dentified. Yes Maybe N__o I. EARTH - Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in the geologic structure? ( ) ( ) b) Disruptions, displacement, compaction, or over covering of the soil? ( ) ( ) [,"f"' c) Change in the topography or ground surface relief features? ( ) ( d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ( ) [ ) e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ( ) ( ) ( f ) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand, or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet, or lake? ( ) ( ) g) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ( ) ( ) II. AIR - Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b) The creation of objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) (/)" 1 c) Alteration of air movement moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ( ) ( ) (,..~ III. WATER - Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? ( ) ( ) (..d" b) Changes in the absorption rate, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) (..d" ( ) c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ( ) ( ) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any body? ( ) (/f" ( . e) Discharge into surface waters, or in alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity? ( ) (.-~ ( , 0 Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ( ) ( ) g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ( ) ( ) ( h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) i) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? ( ) ( ) ~" IV. PLANT LIFE - Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops. and aquatic plants)? b) Reduction in the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c)Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? V. ANIMAL LIFE - Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds, land animals, including reptiles, fish, and shellfish benthic organisms or insects)? b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c)Introduction of any new species of animals into the area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 2 VI. NOISE - Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (z)"' ( ) VII. LIGHT AND GLARE - Will the proposal.' a) Produce new light and glare? ( ) ( ) (-d/' VIII. LAND USE - Will the proposal result in.' a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ( ) ~ ( ) IX. NATURAL RESOURCES - Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X. RISK OF UPSET - Will the proposal involve: a) A risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ( ) ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) (/T/' Xl. POPULATION - Will the proposal.' a) Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? XII. HOUSING - Will the proposal: a) Affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? XIII. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b) Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d) Alterations to the present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e) Alterations to waterborne, rail, or air traffic? f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 3 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES - Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) (,,')"' c) Schools? ( ) (/')/' ( ) d) Parks and other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) (/'1"' f) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) XV. ENERGY - Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS - Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) b) Communications systems? ( ) ( ) c) Water? ' ( ) ( ) (/'f'/ d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (,")/' ~. , f) Solid waste disposal? XVII. HUMAN HEALTH - Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? XVIII. AESTHETICS - Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? ( ) ( ) ()/~/ b) Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? XIX. RECREATION - Will the proposal result in.' a) Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities? (:) ( ) (t,")'/ 4 b) Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? XX. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Will the proposal.' a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b)Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? XXI, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XXII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Narrative description of environmental impacts) - XXIII. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS (Examine whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, pla~~e controls) - XXIV. EARLIER ANALYSES - Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): ZGeneral Plan EIR 5 10/15/96 TI_~ 11:51 F.~X 602 991 9138 ~i. RK-TAYLOR INC, ~ 002 SENT BY: R CUCAMONGA COM O[V; 10- e-96 4;26PU; 909 A7'/' 2847 =~ UARK-TAYLORs INC.; #10117 X Master Environmef~ta[ Assessment for ~ne 1989 Update of the General Plan __ Industrial Area 5pecif~c Plan ~;~Victoria Planned Community E1R _- Terra Vista Planned Community __ Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan __ Etiwanda North 81:~eci~G Plan EIR __ Other. __ Other, xxv. DETI~RMINA'rlON - On the I~asls of this initial a) I find that the proposed project could not have a signifiCa rtt effect on tl~e environment, A NEGATIVE DECLAIF~TION will De I~repamd ........................................................................... [ ) b) I Fred that although the proposed project c~uld have a sign[fican~ effect on the environment, thera wfl! n:t be a significant effe¢~ in ,-his case because mitigation meam;res described on ~e attache~ sheet~ have Dean added to ~ A NEGATIVE ~EGLAFLA. TION w~ll De prepared ......................................................................... .~' c) I i~nd thin The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. ENVIRON AL IMPACT Rt=PORT ENVIRON~ Prepamr's Signature Print Name and Title Date XXVI. APPLICANT CERTIFIC,,ATION (To be completed by app~icam) - ~ certif'y t~t I am the applicant for the proje~ described in this Initial S~dy, I acknowledge that I have read this inifdal Study and ~e proposed m~atian measures. Further, I have Fevised ~e pl'oject plans or prol~oSalS and/or hereby agree to the pro~Dosed miti ation measures to avoi¢ the effects or m~tigae the effects to a point w~ere clearly ne significant envirOnment!?effe ould occur. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Initial Study - Part II Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Project Description: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR - A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units/acre) zone located in the Victoria Planned Community on the north side of Baseline Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. APN: 227-091 - 14, 15 and227-111-12, 13. XXII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. Earth: a) The site is not within any known unstable earth condition area. b) The site will be graded to accommodate the building pads for the proposed use. The impact is not significant. c) The topography of the site will be altered slightly to accommodate the building pads. The grading will be supervised by a licensed soils engineer or registered geologist to ensure compliance with Building Code requirements. The impact is not significant. d) No known or unique geologic or physical features exist on this site. e) Upon completion, the site will be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion. f') The facility will not affect any river, channel, ocean, lake, or bay. g) The majority of California is susceptible to earthquakes. The project is not within any known special study zone that will require additional studies or that poses a unique hazard. The impact is not significant. II. Air: a) The proposed project will generate air emissions from vehicles; however, the proposed use is consistent with the land use designation for the site. The impact is not significant. b) The proposed project will not create any objectionable odors. c) The proposed project will not result in alteration to the climate or air movement. III. Water: a) The development of the project will not affect the currents or course of water movement. b) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hardscape proposed. All waters will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities. The project is designed to collect all surface water runoff into catch basins that will feed into underground pipes to the public storm drain system. As mitigation, the conditions of approval will require the developer to extend the existing public storm drain west of Hanley Avenue (at east project boundary) to connect with catch basins at the Victoria mini storage facility (at west project boundary). c) The project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II VTT 15766 Page 2 d) The project proposes to collect surface water runoff into a storm drain which will discharge into existing interim basins south of Baseline Road. As mitigation, the conditions of approval will require an alternative drainage solution in which the developer extends the existing public storm drain west of Harticy Avenue (at east project boundary) to connect with catch basins at the Victoria mini storage facility (at west project boundary) and eliminate the discharge into the existing interim basins. e) The project proposes to collect surface water runoff into a storm drain which will discharge into existing interim basins south of Baseline Road. As mitigation, the conditions of approval will require an alternative drainage solution in which the developer extends the existing public storm drain west of Harticy Avenue (at east project boundary) to connect with catch basins at the Victoria mini storage facility (at west project boundary) and eliminate the discharge into the existing interim basins. No alteration ofgroundwater is expected to occur with this project. g) No direct additions or withdrawals of ground water are proposed. h) The project is anticipated to use only that amount of water necessary to handle sanitary conditions of the bathrooms and a single residence. The amount of water usage is not significant. 'i) The project is outside of the established flood plain and is protected by existing development and storm drain facilities to the north (upstream). IV. Plant Life: a) Vegetation on site consists of an abandoned vineyard and a row of 18 trees along the northerly boundary. The trees were planted to provide windbreaks for the vineyard. An arborist report (Roth, August 1, 1996) has been prepared which indicates that 16 of the trees are in physiologically good condition. The arborist concluded that the proposed grading cut of 3 to 5 feet in the vicinity of the trees is not consistent with preservation in place. Further, the arborist concluded that the predominant tree species (Eucalyptus) and very sandy soil are not suitable for transplanting. As mitigation, the Conditions of approval will require the developer to remove the trees and replace them with another species of Eucalyptus to maintain the windrow character. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) Landscaping introduced to the site will be compatible with existing landscaping material. Similar materials have been used throughout the area with no impact to native species. d) The existing vineyard on the site has been abandoned for years and is proposed to be removed in its entirety. The impact is not significant. V. Animal Life: a) There are no known animals that currently occupy the site on a regular basis. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II VTT 15766 Page 3 b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) No new species will be introduced as a result of the project. d) The project is surrounded by development on all sides. In that no animals currently use the site on a regular basis, the development of the project will have no impact on fish or wildlife habitat. VI. NoiSe: a) The project will not significantly increase existing noise levels. b) The project is located along Baseline Road, a major arterial street, and is subject to exposure to traffic noise in excess of the General Plan standard of 65 CNEL. An acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996) confirms that noise levels will exceed the allowable noise levels for this zone based upon existing or projected traffic volumes. The acoustical engineer concluded that the project will require exterior noise mitigation to achieve 65 CNEL at all exterior living spaces and common open space areas. The project design includes the orientation of building mass along Baseline Road and the construction of a 7 foot high sound wall along the entire south property line next to Baseline Road; therefore there will not be a significant effect for first floor level. As mitigation for noise levels for the second floor levels, the Conditions of approval will require developer to construct 6 foot high sound walls on all south facing private balconies of the five buildings along Baseline Road. Additional mitigation to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL maximum, special glazing is required for certain windows and sliding glass doors for those units identified by the acoustical analysis. II. Light and Glare: a) New light and glare will be created because the property is currently vacant. City codes require lighting fixtures to be directed away from or shielded from adjoining properties. The project design includes a minimum 20 foot landscape buffer, including a 6 foot high wall, around the project perimeter. A condition of approval requires the applicant to submit a lighting plan for review and approval to ensure the light does not spill over onto adjacent properties. The impact is not significant. VIII. Land Use: a) The project would substantially alter the present vacant land use (an abandoned vineyard). The proposed construction of 264 apartments is consistent with the Medium Residential zone of the Victoria Community Plan. The impact is not significant. IX. Natural ResourCeS: a) The project will not significantly increase the rate of use of natural resources. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II VTT 15766 Page 4 X. Risk of Upset: a) The project will not be storing any hazardous or explosive material. b) The project construction will not interfere with emergency response. XI. Population: a) The project will generate an increase in population of 816 persons using 3.09 persons per dwelling unit per State Department of Finance estimates. The impact is not considered significant because the same increase in population would result if the site were developed as single family residences according to the State Department of Finance. XII. Housing: a) The project will reduce the need for additional housing by constructing 264 apartments. XIII. Transportation: a) The project will generate additional trips because of the new construction. A traffic impact analysis (RKJK, July 2, 1996) prepared for this project which analyzed the existing, Opening Year and the Year 2015 with and without the proposed project. The report concluded that the project will generate 1,740 trip-ends per day with 125 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 155 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The report presents several recommendations for on-site and off-site improvements. As mitigation, the Conditions of approval will require the developer to do the following: 1. Install a stop sign for egress at the project's main entry to Baseline Road. 2. Provide minimum 25 foot radius curb returns to baseline Road at its intersections with project's main entry and with Hanley Street (Street "A"). 3. Provide a 150 foot inbound left turn lane for eastbound left turn traffic at the intersection of Baseline Road and Hanley Street (Street "A"). 4. Construct Baseline Road full width from Hanley Street (Street "A") westerly to future Day Creek Boulevard. 5. Developer shall pay transportation development fees upon issuance of building permits, at the rate adopted by City, as fair share contribution for area wide improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II VTT 15766 Page 5 b) Additional parking will be necessary to accomodate the apartment tenants. The project has been designed with adequate parking spaces to meet the parking requirements. c) The project will generate additional traffic which will impact existing transportation systems (See XIII.(a) above). The proposal is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan and General Plan for which the street widths were evaluated at a build-out condition. d) The project will maintain the existing circulation pagems for the movement of goods. e) The project will not affect air, water or rail traffic. f) The application is expected to increase the risk of traffic hazards due to vehicles entering and exiting the site. The project has been designed consistent with City standards and policies for public improvements and driveways spacing to provide maximum safety available. Pedestrian amenities (sidewalks) will be installed as part of the project. Baseline Road is ultimately planned for a Class II Bike Lane; however, completion of the bicycle trail will occur in the future when sufficient pavement width exists to accommodate the lane. The impact is not significant. XIV. Public Service~: a) The project will increase demands for fire protection and emergency medical services provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The District receives revenue from property taxes and from Mello-Roos Community Facilities District 85- 1 for this area. As mitigation, the Mello Roos CFD requirements shall apply to this project. b) No substantial new services are expected with the project. c) The Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the Etiwanda School District serve the project. The project will generate 115 K-5 students and 51 students in grades 6-8 (Newton, 1996). The project will generate 53 high school students (Sundell, 1996). Both districts have notified the City of the current impaction problems. Adequate school facilities will not exist to serve this development. School funding sources for new development include school impact fees, tax increment revenues from the City Redevelopment Agency, and MellooRoos Community Facilities fees. School impact fees are regulated by the State of California Govemment Code Section 65995. Under GC Section 65996, the City is prohibited from denying the project based on the adequacy of school facilities. The Chaffey Joint Union High School District has formed a Mello-Roos District. The number of students generated by this project alone are not sufficient to require the creation of new elementary, middle or high schools (i.e., schools are normally designed for at least 500 students). However, there would be the need for additional and/or renovated classrooms, more teachers, transportation services, curriculum and equipment. Project will be conditioned to join the Mello-Roos District for the Chaffey Joint Union High School District and pay school impact fees to Etiwanda School District; therefore, the impact is considered to be reduced to a level not significant. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II VTT 15766 Page 6 d) The project will have an insignificant effect on existing park facilities or result in the need for additional facilities. The existing Windrows Neighborhood Park, located 1800 feet away, is the nearest public park which serves the project. Phase I of the Etiwanda Creek Community Park was recently completed and also serves the project. e) The site abuts a road that is being maintained by the City. No additional impacts on public facilities are expected. f) No other government services are expected to be affected by this proposal. XV. Enermz a) The project is not expected to use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. b) The development is not expected to result in substantial increase on the demand of existing energy sources or the need for new energy sources. XVI. Utilities and Service Systems: a) The project will not result in the need for new power or natural gas systems. b) The project will not result in the need for new communication systems. c) The project will use water readily available from existing water lines in Baseline Road. d) The discharge from the site will be handled by the existing sewer facilities. e) The project proposes to collect surface water runoff into a storm drain which will discharge into existing interim basins-south of Baseline Road. As mitigation, the conditions of approval will require an alternative drainage solution in which the developer extends the existing public storm drain west of Hanley Avenue (at east project boundary) to connect with catch basins at the Victoria mini storage facility (at west project boundary) and eliminate the discharge into the existing interim basins. f) The project design includes a common trash compactor and source recycling facilities to reduce the volume of solid waste. No significant solid waste disposal will be necessary to serve the site. XVII. Human Health: a) The development is not expected to create any health hazard. b) No exposure of people to potential health hazards is expected. XVIII. Aesthetics: a) The project will construct 2 story "8 plex" apartment buildings. The existing single family homes to the north are 1 story, except for one home northeast of the subject site which has a second floor window facing south. The apartment buildings are approximately 200 feet away from the nearest single family residence. The proposed project has been designed with pad grades 11-12 feet lower than these homes. These private homes have limited views to the south over the subject site due to the pad grade differential and existing 5'6" high block wall along their south property line. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II VTT 15766 Page 7 The City's General plan identifies no public scenic view corridors or vistas for this site. The project will not obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public. The impact is not significant. b) The project site is exposed to public views from Baseline Road. The project design includes a 7 foot high decorative wall along Baseline within a minimum 44 feet landscape setback. Views into the site will be further limited by the five buildings along Baseline Road. The project design includes a major landscape statement at both project entrances, including covered entry gates, enhanced paving, and focal trees. The project will conform to the strict design guidelines of the City thereby eliminating any offensive site open to public view. The impact is not significant. XIX. ReCreation: a) The project will not impact the quality of existing recreational opportunities. Adequate facilities exist within the area, most notably Windrows Park and Etiwanda Creek park. The City's Recreation Department also offers various recreation classes and programs at nearby Windrows Elementary. b) No known religious or sacred uses are presently conducted on-site. XX. Cultural Resources: a) There are no known prehistoric or historic archaeological sites on the property.. b) There are no known prehistoric or historic buildings, structures or objects on the property. c) The project should not impact any unique ethnic cultural values. XXIII. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS The project density of I 1.9 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Medium Residential zone (8-14 du/ac) of the Victoria Community Plan. the applicant should be cautioned that making automobile dealerships a e in this Subarea would not necessarily assure approval of any specific project.~ :fie said he also le questions that need to be answered regarding access· - Mr. Plies asked concern was regarding access. Chairman Barker said he understand how it will work. Commissioner Lumpp asked if Mr. wns the entire property. Mr. Plies responded affirmatively. Commissioner Lumpp agre.9~t ~ text amendment shot nitiated. He felt the City should also be looking at a larger, i..ssae, such as an auto mall. It was the '~nsus of the Commission to support initiation of of text changes to allow omotive Sales and Leases as a conditionally permitted use to acent to the ~nt Subarea 8 upon submission of an application and payment of the .~d fees· F USE DETERMINATION 96~01; A request to determine if apartments are a permitted or ~itionally permitted use i th Medium Residential zone of the Victoria Community Plan. Dan Coleman. Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker asked if Mr. Coleman had worked on the Victoria Community Plan. Mr. Coleman replied he worked for the City at the time but he did not work on the plan. Chairman Barker recalled that the Victoria Plan was not particularly pro-apartments after a period of time. He also thought that when the City Council rezoned various properties several years ago, one of the objeclives was to decrease the number of apartments in the community. He stated that at one time he had a responsibility of trying to devise a formula to determine how many children reside in various types of housing. He said the community where he worked had a number of apartments, condominiums, town houses, and single family dwellings. He reported a survey was conducted and it was concluded that an apartment house has an immediate impact on schools because a fairly high percentage of apartment dwellers have children when they move in. He said they discovered that only one out of five condominium units have resident children because condominium owners are quite often downsizing after children have left home or just entering the housing market with no children or just starting a family. He was concerned that adding apartments would produce a major immediate impact on the schools. He also questioned if the City needs more apartments and felt that enough have already been provided for the population· He thought that apartment dwellers are generally short-termed. He did not feel that density is a question. so much as the population, the age of the youngsters, and the impact on schools· He invited public comment. Keith Lamparter, Mark-Taylor, Inc., 6623 North Scottsdale Road, Phoenix, Arizona, gave a brief background of the company and stated their development partners are the largest apartment real estate investment trust in the United Slates traded on the New York stock exchange. He stated they understand the concerns about apartments. He said they build very high-end apartments with square footages substantially above other apartments in the communities where they locate· He said they would provide attached and detached garages, covered porte-cocheres, private security entrance gates, and security systems and laundry facilities within the units. He observed the City has strict guidelines for apartments and reported they had submitted a conceptual plan which would require no variances while providing just under 14 unites per acre. He said their plan exceeds the recreational amenities requirements and provides more open space than necessary. He noted their rental fees are generally higher than owning a house and they do not get many families with children in their developments because of the higher rents. He reported that he had contacted the school districts and was told they are not operating at capacity and could accommodate their development. He noted they would have to pay school fees of over a million dollars. He pointed out that the Victoria Community Plan states that Medium Residential can have attached and detached residential of 8-14 dwelling units per acre. He said the definitions indicate an apartment is an attached residential unit. He acknowledged that the text does not specifically list apartments as a permitted use but felt that it does not specifically prohibit apartments and states that uses include, but are not necessarily limited to, those which are listed. Commissioner Melcher asked why the applicant does not build a condominium project and rent it out. Mr. Lamparter replied he was told he should not do that because he had already told the City it will be an apartment project. Commissioner Melcher stated accessibility requirements are different for apartments versus condominiums. Mr. Lamparter agreed. C;ammissioner Melcher noted there are a lot of condominium projects in the City which are operated as apartments. He said the developers built them that way so that they would not have to meet the accessibility requirements and also so they could sell off the units as condominiums if the economy should change. He questioned why the developer was not taking that approach. Mr. Lamparter said they had considered that but his company philosophically does not like to condo- map any projects at present because of liability problems. He said if he could get direction that it would be permissible to build it under a condo-map, he would do so. Commissioner Melcher noted that Lewis Homes has been doing that for years. Mr. Lamparter did not think it would be wise business to advise a neighborhood they are going to do condominiums and then advise them after the project is built, that it is really an apartment project. Commissioner Lumpp asked for a definition of condominium. Mr. Coleman replied that the Victoria Community Plan refers to the State Subdivision Map Act. Ralph Hanson. Deputy City Attorney, stated it refers to a type of property ownership, not in fee, but a right to air space or a portion of property and a deed in common for the common area. Commissioner Lumpp stated that as the definition of condominium is ownership of air space, it means that single family detached, town homes, td-plexes, four-plexes, etc. could be condominiums. He said it has nothing to do with the type of product, but rather the type of ownership. Mr. Lamparler said the text of the plan defines a four-plex as a multi-family use but it was his understanding that multi-family uses are precluded from the zone. Mr. Coleman observed that the Victoria Community Plan defines Multiple Family Use as "The use of a site for two or more dwelling units, which may be in the same building or in separate buildings on the same site." Planning Commission Minutes -16- January 24, 1996 Ilo Commissioner Melcher asked if the applicant could proceed with a condominium project. Brad Buller, City Planner, confirmed that he could. Commissioner McNiel thought Mr. Lampafter had indicated he would have trouble getting a condominium financed. Mr. Lamparter felt they could get financing if they stipulated that the units could not be sold for a certain number of years. Commissioner Melcher felt that the applicant should let the residents in Victoria know that they are planning to construct apartments. He noted those residents had been some of the most vocal opponents to apartments when the City was considering land use changes. He did not think the Planning Commission should determine that apartments are a permitted or conditionally permitted use without informing those residents. Mr. Buller indicated that staff felt the applicant had made some good arguments that the omission of the word "apartments" does not necessarily mean that the use is prohibited so staff brought the matter to the Commission to make a determination. He acknowledged there has been opposition to apartments in Victoria but he noted there is a successful apartment project immediately adjacent to this property which was well received by the community and there have been no issues. He observed that the property immediately to the south is zoned for High density. He noted the applicant had committed to hosting a neighborhood meeting to introduce their project. He stated the COmmission could make a finding that apartments are not prohibited merely because they have been omitted from the definitions or it could direct that the applicant could file for an amendment to the plan to add apartments to the definition. Commissioner Lumpp asked why condominium was being considered a product rather than a type of ownership. Mr. Buller replied that staff thought the intent of the writers of the Victoria Community Plan was that they did not envision apartments in the Medium Residential area but they envisioned single family. Commissioner McNiel stated he was on the Commission when the plan was proposed. He recalled that when the William Lyon Company approached the City, they did not intend to have any apartments at all. He said that condominiums were in vogue at the time, so that use was included in the text. Chairman Barker recalled that the William Lyon Company wanted only single family housing, not condominiums, but certain members of the community and Commission had pushed to have a wider selection of housing available. He noted that condominiums were thought of as a product type and they were considered an alternative to single family homes. Mr. Buller reported that this parcel was envisioned as being a higher density and was originally specified as Medium High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) but it had been rezoned during the last cycle of zoning considerations. Commissioner Melcher remarked that in 1991 the City Council decided the City would have too many apartments at build-out. Mr. Lampader said they focused on this property because it is near the entrance to the planned community but is not truly within it. He observed it is bounded on the north by railroad tracks and a 200-foot buffer with two-story homes and they propose two-story apartments. He noted there is Commercial and Medium-High Residential to the east, a mini-storage facility to the west. and Planning Commission Minutes -17- January 24, 1996 30 units per acre planned across the street on Base Line Road, He said they felt this would be a good transition for that area. Commissioner Lumpp stated he would support a determination that apartments are not a permitted use. He thought the Commission would be making a grave mistake by defining apartments as a permitted use because he felt it would be disrespectful to the residents to make such a determination without allowing community input. Chairman Barker wondered if Victoria has changed and the community attitude has changed. He agreed with Commissioners Melcher and Lumpp that the community should be advised before the Commission made a decision that apartments are an acceptable use. Commissioner Lumpp observed that if the Commission were to allow apartments, another applicant may not provide an upscale project such as what this applicant proposes. Commissioner Melcher noted that the staff report indicated there are nine sites in Victoria which could be affected. Commissioner McNiel remarked that the Commission would still have authority to deny an application if apartments were a conditionally permitted use. Chairman Barker felt such a determination would still bypass the direction from the City Council and be contrary to previous community input. Commissioner McNiel said he understood the potential for criticism if the Commission were to make that determination but he saw the project as a potential opportunity. He thought that if the applicant were to construct in an upscale apartment building, it could be used as leverage to upgrade apartment projects to be built elsewhere in the City. He thought the location is adjacent to Victoria in the eyes of many residents. He felt the City might have any opportunity to bring in higher end apartments. Chairman Barker agreed it may be an opportunity but he questioned if allowing the use would not be bypassing the desires of the residents. Commissioner McNiel did not think so because the applicant had committed to holding neighborhood meetings. Commissioner Melcher agreed with Commissioner McNiel that it may be an opportunity. He said he could support apartments if the action would apply only to the applicant"s site, but he observed that the determination will affect nine sites. Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, carried 3-1-1 (Melcher no, Tolstoy absent) to continue the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m. Chairman Barker agreed with Commissioner Melcher that allowing apartments at this site would open Pandora's Box as the other sites had not been analyzed. He thought the public has a right to comment. In response to a question, Mr. Buller stated the Commission could send out notices and have a public hearing on a Use Determination. Planning Commission Minutes -18- January 24, 1996 Commissioner Melcher suggested that if the applicant wanted to pursue apartments, that staff contact the newspaper to write a story. have an article published in the Active Bulletin, and contact known community activists and bring the matter back in four weeks. He suggested the applicant could also pursue a condominium map. Commissioner McNiel felt that the City is missing an opportunity to do better. Chairman Barker suggested contacting the neighbors. He asked where the application is in the process. Mr. Lamparter replied they submitted a fairly well detailed concept site plan today. Chairman Barker asked if it is detailed enough to bring to a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Lampafter responded that it is. He said they would also like to get initial input on the concept site plan. He thought they could produce detailed colored renderings within the next three to four weeks. Chairman Barker said he was uncomfortable making a decision that affects all nine locations. Commissioner Lumpp felt the Commission should not make such a determination that will affect all the parcels. C;ammissioner McNiel asked if a decision could be made on a site specific basis. Mr. Bullet thought the Commission could find that the plan does not preclude the concept of apartments, but is subject to Planning Commission review on a case-by-case basis to determine if apartments fit into an area. He felt that would give the Commission the opportunity to determine on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis if apartments are acceptable. He said the project could be presented to the community. He observed the applicant could also change the proposal to a condominium because the plan does specify that condominiums are allowed. He said if another applicant then indicates that apartments are a matter of right in the Medium designation. the Commission could still interpret the Plan to say that is not the case. Commissioner Lumpp felt it is not possible to tell which building is a condominiums and which is an apartment unless you know how an operation is run. He noted that staff has indicated you can build a condominium, but not an apartment. He said he would not support making apartments a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the Medium district in the Victoria Community Plan. Commissioner Melcher noted that the staff report states that a use determination would affect more than the applicant's site; however, he understood Mr. Buller to now say the Commission could make a determination that it would be acceptable on this site, while not on other sites. Mr. Buller responded that a determination on this site would affect other sites only in that a developer on the next site may claim that a precedent had been set if apartments are permitted on this site. He said the cleanest way to approach the question would be to indicate that all Medium sites can have the same types of development. Chairman Barker indicated he was not willing to accept apartments on the other sites without specifically studying them. He asked what else the applicant could do. Mr. Hanson stated it would be necessary to fezone the parcel if the Commission wanted to create a special zone. Planning Commission Minutes -19- January 24, 1996 Chairman Barker felt it would be best to rezone the property to Medium High, which would allow apartments. Commissioner Melcher noted that a zone change is expensive and time consuming. Mr. Bullet sensed that the Commission wanted to say that apartments are not permitted in the Medium Residential zone. He suggested the applicant could submit a Pre-Application review for the Commission to look at the design and concurrently introduce the project to the community. He stated the applicant should advise the community that he is filing a condominium plan, which is a permitted use; however, he intends to rent the project. It was the general consensus of the Commission that, in light of the text of the Victoria Community Plan, they could not determine that apartments are a permitted use in the Medium Residential zone. However, the Commission indicated that Mr. Lamparter could proceed with the project using a condominium map and that he should meet with the neighbors and explain what he plans to do. G. COMMERCIAL LAND STUDY DISCUSSION ommissioner Melcher asked if there was any crucial reason that the matter needed to be discussed th evening. He noted that it was 11:40 p.m. and he suggested that the discussion be deferred until the xt meeting if possible. Brad Bulle City Planner, indicated that the item is also included on the February 14 agenda. He observed tha he Commission had previously received a letter from Peter Desforges raising a question about th study and staff had included the matter on tonight's agenda at the Commission's direction. Commissioner Melcher sug ted that a meeting be held on January 31 if there is urgency regarding the matter. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded b umpp, to continue the Commercial Land Study Discussion to January 31 at 7:00 p.m. Motion cam by the following vote: AYES: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MEL ER NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY - artled There were no public comments at this time. COMMISSION BUSINESS ~, Brad Buller, City Planner, noted that the Commission had a memorandum from staff reg~,,,,ng the McDonalds site at Base Line Road and Carnelian Avenue. Planning Commission Minutes -20- January 24, 1996 thought a plan should drive land use changes and not a single tenant with sales tax reve~be pot 'al. -'" Chairman Bar raised the GIS colored map of Foothill Boulevard between Deer Creek Channel and Day Creek Ch el and looked forward to seeing the rest of Foothill mapped. .... helpful to post updated aerial maps and General Plan maps Greg Ho~odh, Lewis Homes, 1 l~'Nodh Mountain Ave land, said it has been difficult to attrad tenants to their cu~ent pr~BCts because of the unce~aintie~dditional land along Foothill Boulevard being rezoned formtail development, for example Vestar is a~ising the availability of He also stated ,tRat, if the City is to entedain rezoning the south side of Foothill levard for Commerci~Ke{ail, the remainder of the north side should be considered at the same tim PRE-APPUCATION R~VI~W 96-01 - Mar~aylor - The review of 264 condominiums on 19 acres of land in the Medium Residential zone (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located in the Victoria Planned Community, on the noah side of Baseline, one block west of Victoria Park Lane. Keith Lampodor, Mark-Taylor, Inc., 6623 Nodh Scottsdale Road, Phoenix, Arizona, introduced himself. Michael Coghlin, Mark-Taylor, Inc., 6623 North Scottsdale Road, Phoenix, Arizona, gave a brief presentation of their company's experience. Wade Felkins, architect for Mark-Taylor, briefly presented their proposed project. He showed the Planning Commission a revised conceptual site plan prepared in response to staff comments and colored elevations of the proposed product. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff issues and concerns which included the following: 1. Is the project design so outstanding as to merit a density at the top of the Medium range? 2. Vacation of Railroad Avenue South and incorporate into project. 3. Acquisition of Redevelopmerit Agency property to the east. 4. Site Plan a. Extend decorative paving inside ent~ gate. b. Stronger connections from parking courts into project interior. I I nn'ng Commission 10- Februa~ 14, 199~ c. Add decorative paving at entrance to parking courts. d. Add tot lot in south half of project. 5. Architecture a. Single white color and stucco over details. b. Blank walls c. Garage roof heights/form along Baseline. Mr. Folkins indicated that the colored elevations represented a Prairie style architectural theme. Commissioner McNiel asked about the tot lot locations and their potential locations in the southerly half of project.. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about parking provided. He stated that the main entry porte cochere must meet fire access standards. Commissioner Lumpp stated that a condominium is not a product, rather it is a form of ownership. He commented that the applicant had previously stated their intent to market these units as rental ap. artments which, in his opinion, is notallowed by the Victoria Community Plan Medium Residential designation. He expressed concern with the applicant's intent to offer garage space rental and asked for clarification of this concept. He stated that he was opposed to the exclusive use of a trash compactor because of the inconvenience for tenants to have to take their trash to a single collection point. Commissioner Tolstoy inquired whether the Base Line Road access point will be used all the time or just for emergencies? He indicated a concern with traffic on Base Line Road. Mr. Coleman replied that the code requires two points of ingress and egress for tenants. Commissioner Tolstoy liked the conceptual site plan layout. He expressed a desire to see recycling facilities in conjunction with the trash compactor. He felt that Railroad Avenue South and the Redevelopment Agency property should be incorporated into the project. He disliked the concept of renting garage spaces to tenants. Commissioner McNiel stated that he liked the conceptual site plan. He felt that the proposed architecture was not acceptable. He suggested neighborhood meetings be held to obtain input from Victoria residents. Commissioner Melcher expressed concern with the site plan in relation to proposed density. He noted a lack of substantial open spaces. He cited Tract 13273 (southeast corner of Milliken and Mountain View Ddve) as an example of the kind of open space desired. He expressed concern with the design of the perimeter drive aisle, in particular, the 90 degree turns and parking along sides. He thought that the architecture seemed "plunked down"' and did not successfully address the surrounding context of Victorian architectural theme. He felt the proposed elevations were hum drum. He said that he liked that a tenant would be able to walk from one unit to another unit without crossing a driveway. Commissioner Barker expressed concern with the proposed density .being at the highest end of the range. He suggested that the applicant address how the project would feel to pedestrians. He indicated a desire to avoid creating a tunnel-like feeling between buildings. He stated that Base Line Road is also a .primary entrance and should receive the same level of design treatment as the Planning Commission Minutes -11- February 14, 1996 Street "A" entrance. He suggested larger open spaces. He said that the architecture must blend with the surrounding context. He expressed concern that he saw nothing special about the project design. ~ L""'P"O'~UBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. COMMISSION BUSINESS There was no additional Commissio ADJOURNMENT 10:50 p.m. - The g Commission adjourned to a workshop immediately following in the Rains Room re< Modification No. 2 to Conditional Use Permit 93-49. The w< adjourned at 12:00 midnight and those minutes appear separately. submitted, Brad ~r Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -12- February 14, 1996 /l'7 ,Etiwanda residents protest development A gmu ol Etiwanda rosidonls is _~_/ /~ (:~ " I~rolest~g tho I~roposed developnienl By Bob Pago of a 264-unil apadmenl coml~lex near ,lie Lhe added Lral'fic, ELiwands scho~,ls Candice l~.,wler. 33. was n~L c~mvinced ,',,,, hil~h 'l',,,,s,l,,y .d~ht when ,d.n,t 40 crime wiii incre,me ir the almrt,ne,,ts ,.,'e said, nil M,,,'I, 'l',,yl,,r c,,,'es nh,,ut is mnlF ".~:1. ? ~'~ I']l. iwnndn residents In'otesLed n In'opused builL in~ munuy. not the cummunity. She said 2¢;4-mfit ,qm,'L,,,e,,t c,,ml, lex ,It,,'i,~ n Michael C,,gl,li,,, n vice prt, side,,t fi,r she knows :qm,'t.n,e,,ts ,,nd the "tylfic,,I n¢,il~hl.,,'hn,,,I rotor, Ling will, an A,'izo,m Mn,'k Tayhn' Inc.. said the coralmay will garbnEe" wh,, live in them. dcvehqmr. . make imin'twements to Base l.ine Road, Goghlin said he realized no cornmira '~ttmat, Sc~L~dahh Adz. - who were Lrying to con- complex Lo deter criminal ncLivity and groups but will cunt. inue to cmnmtmicnte ] ~.~!'.; ~ ':'r~'.t ,,~r~.}~ ~;' vi,,c,, ,'esidcnts the in',,i,,,sed San Ca,',,,eht screen prosi~cctive tenants. Coghlin said wiLh the ,'eside,,Cs dt,,'ing the next ,,,o,,th. clmq~h~x was gi~od fin' iCtiwnndn- lost con- the develoller ldso would be willing to '!'he lqaluling Commission is schedtded iaa~ .......... h'.l ~,f the metLing early. '{'he debate attach n.requirement to the in'tq~erLy deed Lo review the applicnLitm Jan. 8. San Carmela A Proposed Multifamily Development Northwest Corner of Hanley and Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, California December 10, 1996 MARK-TAYLOR, INC. 6623 North Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, AZ 85250 PROJECT SUMMARY ~PPLICANT: MARK-TAYLOR INC. 6623 NORTH SCOTTSDALE ROAD SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85250 (602) ~g1-~111 (602) g91-~138 fax ZONING: EXISTING: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) PROPOSED: NO PROPOSED CHANGE UNIT ANALYSIS: UNIT TYPE: TOTAL It OF UNITS: 1 BEDROOM 96 2 BEDROOM 120 3 BEDROOM 48 TOTAL UNITS THIS PROJECT: 264 NOTE: THIS PROJECT SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN ONE PHASE PARKING ANALYSIS: UNIT TYPE: PARKING REQUIRED: TOTAL/TYPE REQ'D: I BEDROOM UNITS 1.S SPACES/UNIT 144 2 BEDROOM UNITS 1.8 SPACES/UNIT 216 3 BEDROOM UNITS 2 SPACES/UNIT 96 GUEST PARKING 25% of UNITS 66 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: S22 of that, GARAGES REQUIRED: 156 of that, CARPORTS REQUIRED: 156 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 647 of that, GARAGES PROVIDED:. 156 of that, CARPORTS PROVIDED: 1.56 of that, RV PARKING PROVIDED: 53 ACCESSIBLE SPACES: 8 LOT DENSITY: GROSS LOT AREA: 22.2 ACRES NET LOT AREA: 21.507 ACRES NET LOT DENSITY: 11.9 DU/ACRES OPEN SPACE CALCULATION: REQUIRED:. - ACRES PROPOSED: 5.8 ACRES SAN CARMELA Rancho Cucamonga Law Enforcement On two separate occasions we meet with members of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (San Bernardino Sheriffs Department). We expressed to them concerns which neighborhood individuals had expressed in regards to the proposed development. Crime- There were no available statistics or opinions which concluded that multi-family produces more calls or reports than single family. The opinion was that single family and multi- family are equal for calls and reports per dwelling unit. They also conclude, that single family has more incidents of burglary than multi-family. However, multi-family has a greater number of auto thefts than single family. The police department reviewed the site plan for a third time. The objective was to understand the site plan and elevations as it pertains to response and officer safety. Crime Mitigation Factors (Voluntary Stipulations) A. Gated Community- Reduction in auto theft and trespassing. B. Garages 156 (60%) - Reduction in auto theft. C. North Boundary Fencing - Masonry and wrought iron to enhance safety by increasing visibility of the rail-road track area. D. Unit Security - Prewired for alarms, Charlie bars and latch locks on sliding glass doors, pin locks in all windows and dead bolts on front doors. E. Building/Unit Identification 1 .) Each building will be identified by an elevated 16" illuminated number on several sides as officer approaches (foot or vehicular) will vary. 2.) Each unit shall be identified by an illuminated number as part of the light fucture. F. 180 Degree Peepholes. G. Photometric Study- Analysis of the lighting plan to determine a one foot candle average on pathways, sidewalks and parking lot. H. Crime Free Multi-Housing Program - Training and certification of on-site staff and management. MARK-TAYLOR HIGH END MULTI-FAMILY COMPARISON NOVEMBER 20, 1996 COMMUNITY UNITS TOTAL UNDER SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN TOTAL UNIT City RESIDENTS 5 YEARS FACTOR CHILDREN TYPE TelephonelMgr. BUILT K-6 7-8 9-12 BDRIBTH RENTS Montecito 265 345 25 36 10 20 91 1 / 1 $715 Rancho Cucamonga 2 / 2 $855 (909) 941-0408 3 / 2 $885 Debra Martinez 1989 1.3 9.4% 13.6% 3.8% 7.5% 34.3% :Miramonte 290 420 28 38 11 22 99 1 / 1 $605 Ranch Cucamonga ..... 2 / 2 $735 (909) 944-8494 3 / 2 $925 Julia Devereaux 1989 1.4 9.7% 13.1% 3.8% 7.6% 34.1% Sierra Heights 265 397 27 38 12 20 97 1 / 1 $625 Ranch Cucamonga 2 / 2 $855 (909) 466-5500 3 / 2 $1,025 Angela Tkocs 1991 1.5 10.2% 14.3% 4.5% 7.5% 36.6% AVERAGE 273 387 27 37 11 21 96 $803 1.4 9.8% 13.7% 4.0% 7.6% 35.0% PROJECTED Mark Taylor, .Inc. 264 371 26 36 11 20 92 1 / 1 $730 Ranch Cucamonga _ 2 / 2 $875 Base Line Road ~ (' / 2 $1,025 1.4 9.8% 13.7% 4.0% 7.6% 35.0% AVERAGE $877 Notes: The above communities were selected based on size, demographics and amenities as a comparison for rents and to determine the probable number of residents and children the new community will generate. ,t ,t The projected figures for the Mark Taylor development were created by applying the above averages towards the anticipated number of units. MTMSC '.WK4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting January 8, 1997 Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning/I Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancfio Cucarnonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, William Bethel, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Paul Biane, City Council Member; Jim Curatalo, City Council Member; Ron Bieberdorf, Police Captain; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attomey; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Alan Wa,rren, Associate Planner; Dan Waters, Crime Analyst ANNOUNCEMENTS :"' ~.. There were no announce'ments. .~,- / APPROV~[.4~F MINUTES Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried 5-0, to approve the minutes of the · ""'7 ..... -u~nninn c:nmrn~,,-,~, .A,..-,'-...: :,~,.~,i;b~=,; ;', PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR - A request to develop 264 apartments, with a condominium subdivision map, on 22.2 acres of land in the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) zone in the Victoria Planned Community and consideration of a request to vacate Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street known as Hanley Avenue, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. APN: 227-091-14, 15, and 227-111-12 and 13. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 96-13. Staff has prepared a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from November 13, 1996) Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report and indicated that he had received several calls in opposition to the project and Council Member Gutierrez had forwarded a memorandum to the Commission indicating that he had received a call from two residents who were unable to attend tonight's meeting and asked that the Commission deny the project. He asked that the City Attorney address the school issue. \\ II )..~ Ralph Hanson, Deputy Attorney, stated that the City had previously received a letter indicating that there would be negative impacts on the schools. He explained that a 1989 state law mandates that no public agency shall deny approval of a project on the basis of adequate schools; therefore, the City does not have the fight to deny the project on that basis. He observed that the City can impose certain conditions and those conditions were included in the proposed resolution. He stated that the requirement to participate in a Mello-Roos District is the highest legally allowed fee. He noted that someone had presented a letter from the Etiwanda School District at the last meeting in which the School Distdct indicated that the City has the power and obligation to deny a development if negative impacts would result. He stated that power is only available if the development requires a change in the zoning. He noted that this project does not involve a zone change; therefore, the City is only allowed to impose the conditions mandated in the 1989 state law. Chairman Barker commented that the last time he served on the Planning Commission, the City had the power to deny a project and would not approve a project without a letter from the school district indicating an ability to handle the students. He observed that 'practice was then changed by the legislature. Mr. Hanson replied that the 1989 law was a reaction to a number of developers who felt they were being treated unfairly. Mr. Coleman pointed out that in 1991 the City Council lowered the density range for this property as well as others in Victoria from Medium High, with a maximum of 24 dwelling units per acre, to Medium, with a maximum of 14 dwelling units per acre, and this project is proposed at 12 units per a C Fe. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that the Police Department had generated some statistical information at the request of a resident. Dan Watters, Crime Analyst, stated he had provided some statistical information regarding cdmes in three areas of the City at the request of resident Candice Fowler. He said the three areas were Area 1, generally near the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Haven Avenue; Area 2, generally near the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue; and Area 3, the Victoria tract. He said they compiled crime statistics on the single family parcels excluding commercial and apartment condominiums for felony and misdemeanor reports. He observed that the crime rate for Area 1 is the highest and Area 2 the lowest. He said the Police had not made any determination regarding the results. He stated that Area I is highest and reasons may be because there are more apartments. He said that it is true the proposed apartment complex will have an impact but any development will have an impact. He said the Police Department could not determine whether it will be high impact. Commissioner Macias stated he was not sure of any significance of the crime statistics. He observed that other areas could also have been selected and asked what the figures really show. Mr. Waters responded that the areas were not selected by the Police Department, but rather had been requested by Ms. Fowler. Commissioner Macias noted the crime statistics were compared to the other areas but were not compared to other apartment areas in the City, older single family residential areas which may have more crime because of age, or the overall City average, etc. Mr. Waters indicated that was correct. He said he was not sure why Ms. Fowler picked those selected areas. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief, stated his department had provided a listing of calls to three areas for 1994, 1995, and 1996 in response to a resident's request. He reported that the landowners approved a Mello-Roos Fire Protection District which was set up in 1985 to provide revenues for Planning Commission Minutes -2- January 8, 1997 operations and maintenance costs for the portion of the City which encompasses the project area. He commented that in 1987 the Fire District adopted a Fire Defense Master Plan for providing fire protection as development occurred. He stated that in 1987 the project area was zoned for up to 24 dwelling units per acre and the Master Plan is based on that density. He noted that in .1991 the City Council reduced the density to a maximum of 14 dwelling units per acre. Chief Michael stated that statistics show a number of calls are generated by apartment complexes, but he believed that there is no significant difference between apartment complexes and the same number of units in a single family residential tract. He said that generally people who own their homes tend to use the services a little more. He said he reviewed the data that was provided for 1996 and noted that one single family residence generated 12 calls in that period. He did not feel the proposed apartments are an undue impact on fire protection over what has been planned for. He said the Fire Department reviewed environmental data when the project area was planned for greater density than what is now proposed. He reported that any multi-family dwelling units built after 1990 are required to have residential fire sprinkler systems which further reduces the impact of potential fire damage and injury as compared to units without built-in fire protection. Chairman Barker asked the City Attorney to review the authority that the Planning Commission has with regard to the application. He said his personal feelings regarding apartments and the increased density are a matter of record. He indicated that if tonight's request were to change zoning to allow an increase in density, he would vote no. However, he said this is not a request to increase density and it is a property where property owners have a right to develop within certain parameters. Mr. Hanson responded that the Commission must first review the project to determine if it meets all the laws and regulations of the City. He said the City has spent hundreds of hours developing detailed design standards for every type of project and the Commission must assess if it meets those standards. He stated the Commission must also determine if a particular development is compatible to surrounding properties; will it cause physical harm to any adjacent properties. He commented the Commission has the opportunity to establish conditions to mitigate such impacts. He thought the Commission has been asked to do something which it does not have the power to do. He said the Commission is designed to look at the physical impacts of structures and new development and the physical reactions from that project which can be demonstrated. He thought on this project the Commission has been asked to look at the qualities and impacts from potential residents of the structure and no one can judge the impacts of people. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Michael Coghlin, Mark Taylor, Inc., 6023 North Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, Arizona, stated that over the last 14 years Mark Taylor has built over 10,000 units in complexes in New Mexico, Nevada, and Arizona and is now just beginning in southem California. He felt the proposed community is the finest they have ever built because of the articulation on the elevations, significant entry statements, the lowest density they have ever proposed (11.9 versus an average of 22), and uninterrupted open space. He said the City requires 40 percent of the site to be open space but they are providing 58 percent. He discussed the amenities and architectural elements. He stated they had been asked at the end of the last meeting to outline some of the mitigation measures. He said they met with the Police Department, both school districts, and the City Traffic Engineer. He commented they will be participating in the Mello-Roos District for Chaffey Joint Union High School with an approximate fee of $234,000. He said they met with the Director of Business Services and that satisfies the school's requirement. He reported they met with Etiwanda School Distdct and the distdct had previously been under the impression that they were asking for zone change. He indicated they have received a mitigation agreement from the school distdct and it is in the amount they had anticipated paying. He said the site plan has been reviewed by the Police Department and crime prevention design measures have been included. Mr. Coghlin stated they will be installing a private drainage system on Base Line Road to connect to the existing storm drain system across the project's frontage and he outlined the improvements they will make to Base Line Road to mitigate traffic increases. He indicated they will also participate in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for fire protection. He observed that the site plan conforms to the General Plan and is in harmony with the Victoria Planning Commission Minutes -3- January 8, 1997 Community Plan and exceeds City design standards. He remarked that the community had expressed a concern that the community will become an affordable housing complex and said they had offered to place an irrevocable deed restriction to prevent it from becoming an affordable housing community. Chairman Barker stated that the City Attorney had advised that the City cannot enforce restrictions against subsidized or affordable housing. Mr. Hanson confirmed that the City cannot participate in housing discrimination. He observed a private owner has a lot more power. Chairman Barker asked if it would be fair to say the owner can restdct subsidized housing but the City cannot tell the owner to do so. Mr. Hanson agreed that was a fair statement. Mr. Coghlin felt that all areas of potential impact have been successfully mitigated. He said they held a neighborhood meeting on December 10 to explain the project. Randy Waterman, 12502 Lantana Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, submitted petitions opposing the project which were signed by over 450 residents. The following people spoke in opposition to the project: Emmanuel Ramirez, 12342 Huckleberry Court, Rancho Cucamonga Rex Marsh, 12442 Columbine Way, Rancho Cucamonga Edward Young, 12714 Farrington, Rancho Cucamonga Candice Fowler, 13205 Catalpa Street, Rancho Cucamonga Albert Sharp, 6697 Peach Place, Rancho Cucamonga Jim Fergot, 12351 Sweetgum Drive, Rancho Cucamonga George Marston, 6616 Rosemary, Rancho Cucamonga Colleen Sundberg, 6798 Palm Way, Rancho Cucamonga Steve Jennings, 12335 Sweetgum, Rancho Cucamonga LaVon Feeley, 12025 Coriander, Rancho Cucamonga John Fowler, 13205 Catalpa, Rancho Cucamonga Sheri Rojo, 12477 Tamadsk, Rancho Cucamonga Jim Cooper, 6742 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Clarence Conwell, 6632 Mimosa Place, Rancho Cucamonga Millie Glenny, 6580 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga They expressed fears about increased traffic, increased crime and gang activity, increased fire and police calls, decreased property values, crowding and increased traffic around sports facilities, inability of the City to provide adequate sport facilities for practices and games for existing residents, overcrowded schools, lack of sufficient parking for parents at Cucamonga Middle school, high speeds on Base Line Road, and lack of architectural conformance with Victorian and country atmosphere of adjacent properties. There was concern that the increased population will require development of a supermarket, auto parts store, etc. It was questioned if the traffic study took the Ontario Mills project, Fontana raceway project, and the 1-30 Freeway construction into account. There was an objection that the community was not asked to provide input for the traffic study. They felt there had been insufficient notice and they objected to an out-of-state developer. Two residents stated that Victoda was built with the thought that the Lakes project was to be built with parks, lake, and sports courts and fields but the Lakes project was not built. They therefore thought alternate services should be provided before allowing increased population. Several residents faulted the City for not building the mall and noted that Ontario built the Mills project and an auto mall. The City was also criticized for building the jail and allowing a gravel median on Etiwanda Avenue. They felt the City was allowing overbuilding in order to generate revenue. One resident stated that one member Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 8, 1997 of the Planning Commission was appointed without notice to the public that a vacancy was to occur and he asked that the City Attorney provide an opinion as to the legality of that appointment. It was felt that apartment projects decline after five years because there is no pride of ownership. It was requested that the zoning be changed and several residents objected to increasing the density. Chairman Barker stated that the developer is not asking to increase the density but has certain property dghts already established. He said the Commission can only legally make decisions based upon certain things; i.e., traffic impacts, inappropriate design, etc. Ms. Fowler said she had requested statistics on the three specific areas because she wanted to show that there are more police calls for the residences near Lemon and Haven Avenues and she felt that was because of the three apartment complexes in the area. One resident pointed out that Cdme Analyst Dan Waters had even stated that the area near Lemon and Haven Avenues may have a higher incidence of crime because of its proximity to apartments. A complaint was registered that the existing apartment complex in the area posts for rent signs in public rights-of-way and the City does not enforce sign regulations because the postings are on weekends. One resident asked that a Police substation be opened in the area if the development is approved. One resident objected to the removal of the trees. It was pointed out that the arbodst report indicated that two of the trees on the north project boundary were dying but none had fallen over during the recent winds. He asked that the trees remain if the project were approved. One resident stated that several years ago the City had proposed a housing project on the north side of Base Line Road west of the original Victoria development and the City Council had called off the project because of concerns voiced by the residents. A resident stated that escrow has not closed on the land; therefore, she felt no one would not suffer if the project were denied. One resident quoted from 1991 City Council minutes indicating that Council Member Wright had stated the crowding of apartments in Victoda should be reconsidered and higher rents do not necessarily make a project nicer, Mayor Stout felt the Etiwanda Plan should be looked at again to make it a rural country atmosphere as it was originally designed, and Council Member Bouquet suggested multi- family projects should have phased construction and occupancy to ease into total occupancy. She felt that if phasing is important for an apartment complex, it is even more critical for a total City. She suggested building a few hundred homes and then building a school or park and adding on to the cost of homes to generate money to do so. It was requested that the land not be overdeveloped and land should be left for the shepherds to herd sheep. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public headng. Commissioner McNiel observed that the arborist report indicated that some of the existing trees on the border of the property could survive but others could not. He stated that the Commission depends heavily upon the experts for that information. He asked which trees are to be removed. Mr. Coleman gave a bdef overview of the Tree Removal Permit. He stated the trees in question are located along the north property line inside the project boundary. He said the proposal by the developer is to remove all of the trees and they would be replaced on more than a one-to-one ratio because there is an extensive landscaping boundary in that area. Commissioner McNiel noted that there had been comments regarding crowding in parks and problems with respect to youth organizations. He said that he has lived in the community a long time and there was only one park when he was involved with Little League, but the City now has 18 to 20 parks. He stated that the City's population is growing and is now at about 120,000 people, with build-out planned to nearly double that population. He commented it is a reality that there will be more people. He noted that one resident had stated that when the Etiwanda Specific Plan was adopted in the 1980s, there were objections by the people at that time because all of the open space was being lost. He said that is a fact and the community will continue to grow and the community should be able to maintain the standards that have been enjoyed. He felt housing must be provided for anybody and everybody. He thought there were very few people in the audience who had not at Planning Commission Minutes -5- ,January 8, lgg~ one time lived in an apartment. He acknowledged that traffic is heavy on Base Line Road and Highland Avenue and that traffic travels extremely fast. He felt the proposed apartment complex is a high quality concept and he thought the developer has provided commitment to the community because of the high standards of the community. He expressed concerns about meeting the requirement of the law. He stated that the law gives every property owner certain rights and he did not think the City can stomp on those rights. Commissioner Bethel expressed concem that the developer is from out of state. He thought that the quality of people in an apartment project is determined by the management and he did not feel an out-of-state developer would have a vested interest in the project. He commented that the project has been discussed as an apartment over the last 6 to 12 months. He thought the Victoda Community Plan does not allow apartments even though he recognized that conflicts with the General Plan. He acknowledged that the project could be recorded as a condominium map. He was concerned that it would still be apartments but the developer could later evict the tenants and sell the units as condominiums if the economy changes. He thought the intent of the Victoria Plan was not to have apartments. He commented that even though the density has been reduced, he thought the concerns expressed were valid. He stated that Crescent Heights puts out flags and signs and is obviously not fully occupied, so apartment seekers can still live in that area. He was concemed that if this project is approved, there would be a precedent set for future projects. He opposed the project. Commissioner Macias stated he had listened to the comments and read the materials presented. He indicated that having been trained as an urban planner, he had reviewed the project as a whole and looked at what is required and what is allowed on the property and what is required and being exacted from the developer for the development. He said he has a general concem for the property rights of everyone including the existing residents and the developer. He was concerned that the process has already gone so far. He stated that he is land use planner, not a politician. He observed that the developer has done what was required. He thought that if the Commission and the City Coundl is ultimately concemed about the requirements-the age, spidt, and intent of specific elements of the General Plan-then those issues should be specifically addressed because every project being submitted will function as this one has. He felt the General Plan should be addressed because it will ultimately dictate the future of the City. He believed that in this case, the developer had accomplished everything that was required and he supported the project. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the Victoria Planned Community was approved a number of years ago with certain densities being set for the community following a number of public hearings. He said that because the City did not want high densities, those densities were then lowered several years ago, at which time this parcel was reduced from a maximum of 24 dwelling units to 14. He indicated the densities were lowered because people had voiced an opinion that high density is not wanted. He thought the people tonight had expressed an opinion that density is still a concem. He noted that concerns had been raised about schools, sport fields, traffic congestion, crime, inadequate police and fire services. displaying of illegal rental signs, and removal of heritage trees. He observed that heritage trees have been a problem and he stated that several houses had heritage trees fall on them during the recent wind storms. He stated that one of the first ordinances the City passed was a tree preservation ordinance, but it has been found that the blue gum Eucalyptus trees are a real problem because they become hollow inside as they age and are dangerous. He said the trees met the requirements of the citrus growers when they were first planted, but they no longer serve their purpose and are being replaced with trees which hopefully will not cause problems in the future. He noted that the residents had also raised concems about density, damage to personal property, lower property values, building design, and that apartments are undesirable. He stated that because Victoria is a planned community, there are a number of requirements for every project and the project proposed is consistent with the General Plan and the Victoda Planned Community. He stated the owner of the property has property rights just as do the residents.' He commented that the developer has met all City requirements including mitigations for traffic, schools, Fire District, and design requirements. He supported the project because he felt the property rights need to be honored, the project is consistent with the General Plan, and the developer has met all the Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 8, 1997 requirements. He thought it is a good project which has a lot of amenities and has been thought through carefully by the developer. He felt the City needs to look at revising the General Plan but he did not feel the project could be denied on the basis of something the City may do in the' future. Chairman Barker stated that in the early 1980s he was in the audience at a hearing at Alta Loma High School at which time he gave a speech against a condominium project, citing many of the concerns raised tonight, and he has not changed his mind about the impact of density on a community. He stated that the General Plan has been modified over the years but it exists and certain rules exist. He felt the General Plan should be revisited to reflect changes in the status quo. He acknowledged that the application is in compliance with the existing zoning and all of the regulations currently in existence. He felt there is a relationship between apartment projects and crime but acknowledged that was a visceral reaction on his part and he could not provide hard evidence. He stated the City cannot deny condominiums and also cannot deny the project because it will be occupied by tenters. He said the only thing he could legally hang his hat on was that he did not feel the traffic impacts have been appropriately mitigated. He observed that Commissioner Tolstoy had indicated a preference to remove and replace the trees and asked how the other Commissioners felt. Commissioner McNiel agreed the trees should be replaced. Commissioner Bethel stated he was not as knowledgeable about trees as Commissioner Tolstoy. He commented he had been without power for several days because power poles had blown down during the recent winds, so he did question if the trees are truly hazardous since they did not fall. He felt that if the project were approved, conditions should be modified to leave the trees in place. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the trees should be removed and noted there will be some grading in the area which will make them more dangerous. Commissioner McNiel thought blue gum Eucalyptus are a fire hazard and noted that limbs have fallen on houses and people. Commissioner Macias felt the trees should be removed. Commissioner McNiel asked for comments from staff regarding traffic. Mr. Bulter indicated a traffic analysis had been completed with the project. He noted the public had commented regarding the adequacy of that evaluation with regard to traffic impacts. He said the City's Engineering staff had reviewed the report and found sufficient evidence to show that this project is meeting the impacts as it relates to this project and paying its fair share to transportation fees which would then address areas outside of its immediate frontage. He stated that in the past traffic issues have been resolved as development occurs. Commissioner McNiel asked what improvements will be made to Base Line Road and Highland Avenue in the future. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated this project is required to construct Base Line Road full width from future Day Creek Boulevard easterly to the full-width improvements at Hanley Avenue, which would be over 400 feet off-site. He said concerns had been raised about Victoda Park Lane because this community currently only has Victoria Park Lane to enter and exit on Base Line Road. He reported that the City Engineering Department is currently preparing an estimate to determine the cost of Day Creek Boulevard to connect Highland Avenue to Base Line Road and will be proposing an improvement project for Day Creek Boulevard in the fiscal year starting July 1997. He commented those improvements may not be full width but it will greatly alleviate the Victoda Park Lane situation. He said the City had just received bids for construction of a traffic signal at Base Line Road and East Avenue. He noted the City had just recently completed some widening on Base Line Road. He acknowledged that there will be more trips to schools on Highland Avenue. Planning Commission Minutes -7- January 8, 1997 Commissioner McNiel asked if any traffic control is proposed on Highland Avenue beyond the scope of this project. Mr. James replied that the Route 30 Freeway is under design and should be operational by 2002, which will necessitate certain closures and rerouting of Highland Avenue. Mr. Buller stated that the Highland Avenue issue was previously raised at a City Council meeting and the Council has addressed and will continue to address this issue because the Council agreed it is a concem. He said Highland is outside the scope of this project and being handled separately. He observed that staff was suggesting addition of an engineering condition to require the developer to make a good faith effort to acquire off-site property interests necessary to construct required public improvements and a standard condition regarding CC&Rs. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Macias, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract 15766 with the modifications recommended by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: BARKER, BETHEL ABSENT: NONE - carried Chairman Barker stated his no was because he did not feel the traffic has been appropriately mitigated. Commissioner Bethel cited the traffic problem and his belief that the intent of the original Victoria Community Plan was to not have apartments in that area. Chairman Barker advised that anyone can appeal the decision to the City Council and indicated staff would explain the process. ~.MENTAL ASSESSMENT A AMENDMENT 96-03A - RA REALTY Fb.J.!ND III - A request for a land use change from Industrial Park to Community Commercial fo'~'7':,8:.acres generally located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Aspen and Spruce Avenues and at the northwest comer of Red Oak Street and Spruce Avenue. The City will also considef:"Sha£J.,ging the remaining 1.4 acres of land at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Aspen AVenUe, 2.25 acres at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue, and 1.2 acres at the-qortheast corner of Red Oak Street and Laurel Street to Community Commercial - APN: 208-'352710, 11, 12, 79, and 80. Staff has prepared a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmentaFimpacts for consideration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03 - RANCON REALTY FUND III - A request .to amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan land use designation from Industrial Park to Community Commercial for 7.8 acres generally located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Aspen: and Spruce Avenues and at the northwest comer of Red Oak Street and Spruce Avenue. The City will also consider changing the remaining 1.4 acres of land at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Aspen Avenue, 2.25 acres at the southwest corner of Foothill BouleVard and Spruce"Av, enue and 1.2 acres at the northeast corner of Red Oak Street and Laurel Street to Community Commercial - APN: 208-352-10, 11, 12, 79, and 80. Staff has prepared a mitigated Negati~e~, Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Planning Commission Minutes -8- January 8, 1997 ].~ I RESOLUTION NO. 97-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), APPROVING THE VACATION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH AND THE EAST COLLECTOR STREET KNOWN AS HANLEY AVENUE, AND APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 96-13, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 AND 15 AND 227-111-12 AND 13. A. Recitals. 1. Mark Taylor Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the October I and December 10, 1996, neighborhood meetings were conducted by the applicant to explain the proposed project to area residents and solicit their input. All property owners within the public hearin9 notification area were invited to attend. 3. On November 13, 1996, and continued to January 8, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearings on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found. determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearings on November 13, 1996, and January 8, 1997, includin9 written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane, with a street frontage of 800 feet and lot depth of 1,100 feet and presently contains an abandoned vineyard; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a 40-foot wide strip of vacant land known as "Railroad Avenue South" proposed to be vacated, an unused rail corridor, and single family homes; the property to the south consists of a winery; the property to the east is apartments and a shopping center; and the property to the west is a mini-storage facility:, and c. The project is proposed to include a vacant parcel owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency along the easterly boundary, which includes an easement for a rail spur proposed to be vacated; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-01 VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR January 8, 1997 Page 2 d. The project design includes a 7-foot high sound attenuation wall along Base Line Road consistent with the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996); and e. The project design is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan, including, but not limited to, the use of the Victoda Community Plan's theme wall treatment along Base Line Road; and f. The project design includes 57 percent common open space and 58 percent usable open space; and g. The proposed density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan; and h. The vacation of Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street, known as Hanley Avenue, is consistent with the General Plan; and I. The project design includes a private drainage system to collect all surface water runoff into catch basins that will connect with the public storm drain system; and j. The project design includes a minimum 20-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot high decorative wall around the perimeter; and k. The affected school districts have submitted wdtten comments consistent with the recommended conditions of approval requiring the developer to participate in the high school Mello-Roos Distdct and payment of school fees to th~ elementary school district; and I. The project has been designed with a minimum 200-foot setback from the nearest single family residence and pad grades 11-12 feet lower than the single family residences to the north. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Victoria Community Plan; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Victoria Community Plan; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-01 VTT15766- MARK TAYLOR January 8,1997 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearings, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1 ) Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 15766 is granted subject to the applicant's obtaining ownership of Railroad Avenue South and the property to the east, Assessor's Parcel No. 227-111-12, and the vacation of the rail spur easement located thereon. Engineering Division 1 ) Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street, Hanley Avenue, shall be vacated and incorporated as part of the project. 2) Verification of ownership change or letter of intent from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency stating approval and pending ownership change for the property to the east, Assessors Parcel No. 227-111-12, under current ownership by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, as shown within the project boundary. 3) Construct Base Line Road full width from Day Creek Boulevard (future) to the existing limit of full-width improvements at Hanley Avenue, including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, asphalt paving, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, median island, bike trail (Class II), and all necessary transitions both east and west of the project limits, pursuant PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-01 VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR January 8, 1997 Page 4 to City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Also, provide the following: a)Median island construction shall also include full landscaping in accordance with the Base Line Road Master Plan. b) Traffic Signal Improvements - install conduits (with pull rope), including interconnect conduit, pull boxes, and poles for future traffic signal at Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue. 4) Construct Hanley Avenue full width including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, asphalt paving, sidewalk, street lights, and street trees, pursuant to City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Parkway improvements may be deferred on the easterly side with the exception of street lights. The existing secondary access to Base Line Road shall be abandoned and the access realigned and constructed to Hanley Avenue as shown on the tentative tract map. Right-of-way dedication of 66 feet, including the cul-de-sac, as shown on the tentative tract map, shall be provided. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements along Hanley Avenue, as shown on the tentative tract map, and, if he/she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, at least 120 days pdor to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 5) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all new street lights during the first six months of operation, pdor to building perTnit issuance or approval of the Final Map, whichever occurs first. 6) No median breaks will be allowed between Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard (future), except at Hanley Avenue. 7) Gated driveways are to be in accordance with the City's gated driveway entrance design guide for turnaround area. 8) Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue to be posted with R 26(s) "NO STOPPING ANY TIME" signs. 9) The sidewalk along the Hanley Avenue cuPde-sac shall be property-line adjacent. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-01 VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR January 8, 1997 Page 5 10) On-site drainage shall be collected by a private drainage facility to the satisfaction of the Building Official. Connection to a public drainage facility or outletting into the public right-of-way shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Building & Safety Division 1) Provide private drainage easement at the north property line. No drainage over slope is allowed (see Section A-A); collect and discharge. Submit final hydrology report prior to issuance of any permits. 2) Proof of right-of-entry to do work, if there is any work on surrounding properties, shall be provided prior to issuance of grading permit. 3) Positive drainage away from buildings shall be provided. Environmental Mitigation 1) Extend the existing storm drain in Base Line Road west of Hanley Avenue to connect with the catch basins at Victoria Station and remove the existing interim storm drains across Base Line Road. 2) Tree Removal Permit No. 96-13 is hereby approved and shall be valid for a period of 90 days starting from the date of final map recordation or issuance of any grading or building permits, whichever comes first, subject to extension by the Planning Division. Developer shall replace removed trees with Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum), minimum 15-gallon size, and spaced at 8 feet on center to maintain the windrow character along the northerly boundary. 3) Developer shall follow all recommendations of the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996), including, but not limited to, constructing 6-foot high sound barriers on all south facing private balconies of the five buildings along Base Line Road and special glazing for windows and sliding glass doors in certain units. 4) Install a stop sign for egress at the project's main entry to Base Line Road prior to occupancy. 5) Provide minimum 25-foot radius curb retums to Base Line Road at its intersection with project's main entry and with Hanley Avenue (Street "A"). 6) Provide a minimum 150-foot inbound left turn lane for eastbound left turn traffic at the intersection of Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue. 7) Construct Base Line Road full width on the northerly side from Hanley Avenue to the westerly tract boundary. 8) Developer shall contribute a fair share towards area-wide improvements. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-01 VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR January 8, 1997 Page 6 9) Project shall be subject to Mello-Roos Community Facilities District requirements for fire services. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 1997. PLANNI .F~ HECITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:~.", )a~,id"ltarker, Chair an ATTEST: ~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary for the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MA(::I,~, MCN~[EL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15766 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 264 APARTMENTS W/CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP APPLICANT: MARK TAYLOR, INC. LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~,. Time Limits Completion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not __ __/__ issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, __ participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, __ __/__ the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distdct for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. sc* ~o~gs 1 Projet1 No VTT 15766 COrnoletion Date 4. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /__/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions __/__/__ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be __/__ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape. irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for __/__ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, __/__/ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved __/__/__ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, __/__ including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property __/__ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the __/__ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the sc -~o/96 2 [ ..~ Pro)ect No VTT 15766 Completion Date City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a eist of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for heating any swimming __/__/__ pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. 3, All parking spaces shall be double stdped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall prohibit recreational vehicle parking on interior __/__ __ circulation aisles other than in designated recreational vehicle parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho __/ /__ Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily __/__/__ residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. E, Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping __/__/__ in this case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and SC - ~0t96 3 / L~ Project No V'r'T 15766 Completion Date submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to tt~e issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A m~nimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within / the project: 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, and 80% - 15-gallon 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking __/__ stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 4. All private slopes in 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included __ __/ in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway lanclscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering __/__/__ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along BaSq Line Road. 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the __ __/ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the __ __/__ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of __ __/__ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. __ __/__ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. SC - 10/96 4 /____/// Prolect No V'I'T 15766 Completion Date 2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, veri~/the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted UnLform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical __/__/__ Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to __/__/ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, alter tract/parcel map recordation and __/__/__ prior to issuance of building permits. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __/__/__ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to __/ __ /__ perform such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. __/__/__ sc-~o~e 5 / PrOleCt NO V'FT' 15766 Completion Oate PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ~'HE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Base Line Road for Right Turn Lane 66 total feet on Henley Avenue including cul-de-sac 2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: BaSe Line Road. 3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 5. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. L. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curo & A.C, Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Street Name Gutler Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Base Line Road X X,b X,c X X X X,a X X Hanley Avenue X X X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per STD. 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. See Special Conditions. 6 Project No VT'r 15766 Completion Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights __/__/ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a __/ / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect winng. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. sc- ~o~6 7 / L/ZL~Z Project No V'TT 15766 Completion Date Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall __/__ be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed' into the Landscape Maintenance District: Median island on Base Line Road. 2. A signed consent and waiver form to ioin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting __/__ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / developer until accepted by the City. 4. Median island and parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of __/ /__ the respective Beautification Master Plan: Base Line Road. N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured __ __/__ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. O. Utilities 1. Pro.vide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __ __/ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __ __/__ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __ __/__ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. __ __/__ 2 Fire flow requirement shall be 2,50.,Q gallons per minute. __ __/__ a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __ __/__ personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall__ __/__ be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. SC - 10/96 Project NO V'FT' 15766 Completion Date 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible Duilding materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final__/__ inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/__/__ X Other: 1994 Uniform Buildinq Code. / / Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of /__ sprinkler system. 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __ __/__ 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways, __ X Other: See attached Ordinance No. 22 for acce,~s/width requirements. __ __/__ 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. ~ __/__ 12. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear __ of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 13. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground __ __/__ up so as not to impede fire apparatus. 14. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: X Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). sc-~o~ 9 J LfC~ Project No V'I'F 15766 Completion Date 15. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire / / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 16. Plan check fees in the amount of $0__ have been paid. An additional $125.00 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. / / Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, / / UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. __ __/__ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with /__ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. __ __/__ R. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. __ __/__ 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within __ __/__ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. __ __/__ S. Security Fencing 1. When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since __ fire and law enforcement can access these devices. T. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted __ ~/~ from frame or track in any manner. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. sc-~o~ 10 //_.iL -~ Project NO VTT 15766 Cqmpletlon Date 2. At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with / / vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. 3, All developments shall submit a 8 1/2" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant / / developments to the Police Department. sc - lot:j6 11 / RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15766, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 AND 15 AND 227-111-12 AND 13. A. Recitals. 1. Mark Taylor Inc. has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 15766, as described in the title of this Resolution. Heroinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 13, 1996, and January 8, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held meetings to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meetings on November 13, 1996, and January 8, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane, with a street frontage of approximately 800 feet, a lot depth of approximately 1,100 feet, and presently contains an abandoned vineyard; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a 40-foot wide strip of vacant land known as "Railroad Avenue South" proposed to be vacated, an unused rail con'idor, and single family homes; the property to the south consists of a winery; the property to the east is apartments and a shopping center; and the property to the west is a mini-storage facility; and c. The project is proposed to include a vacant parcel owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency alon9 the easterly boundary, which includes an easement for a rail spur proposed to be vacated; and d. The project design includes a 7-foot high sound attenuation wall along Base Line Road consistent with the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996); and e. The project design is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan, including, but not limited to, the use of the Victona Community Plan's theme wall treatment along Base Line Road; and f. The project design includes 57 percent common open space and 58 percent usable open space; and /(_//~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 DR FOR VTT15766- MARK TAYLOR Januan/8,1997 Page 2 g. The proposed density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan; and h. The vacation of Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street, known as Hanley Avenue, is consistent with the General Plan; and i. The project design includes a private drainage system to collect all surface water runoff into catch basins that will connect with the public storm drain system; and j. The project design includes a minimum 20-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot high decorative wall around the perimeter. k. The affected school distncts have submitted written comments consistent with the recommended conditions of approval requiring the developer to participate in the high school Mello-Roos District and payment of school fees to the elementan/school district. I. The project has been designed with a minimum 200-foot setback from the nearest single family residence and pad grades 11-12 feet lower than the single family residences to the north. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meetings on November 13, 1996, and January 8, 1997. and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity and a mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 15766 and adopted by separate Resolution of this Commission. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1 ) Approval of Design Review for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 15766 is granted subject to the applicant's obtaining ownership of Railroad Avenue South and the property to the east, Assessors Parcel No. 227-111-12 and the vacation of the rail spur easement located thereon. 2) Provide 225 square feet of private open space within patios for ground floor units and 150 square feet for upper story units (RCMC 17.08.040.C.). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 DR FOR VTT15766- MARK TAYLOR January 8,1997 Page 3 3) Provide 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space off patio area or within garage/carports (RCMC 17.08.040.R.1 .). 4) Provide washer/dryer hookups inside all units (RCMC 17.08,040.R.2.). 5) Within garages, each car space shall be separated with a solid wall except where two or more spaces are designated to a single dwelling unit. For single garage car spaces, the inside dimension shall be increased to a minimum of 10 feet by 20 feet for convenience of use (RCMC 17.08.090.C.4.b.). 6) All appliances and fixtures shall be energy conserving (RCMC 17.08.040.1.2). 7) All required visitor parking spaces shall be clearly marked with signs, such as pavement markings and freestanding signs. A minimum of 66 visitor parking spaces shall be provided. Visitor parking shall be provided within 150 feet of all units (RCMC 17.08.040. L.). 8) RV parking spaces shall be clearly marked with signs, such as pavement markings and freestanding signs. 9) Provide a site directory monument sign at both project entrances to direct visitors and emergency vehicles to buildings. The signs can be up to 12 square feet in area, with a maximum of 8 feet high and must be illuminated for legibility 24 hours a day. Contents shall include building locations, dnveway locations, address of each building, and fire hydrant locations (RCMC 14.20.080). 10) Any common mailbox structures shall be designed to architecturally match buildings. 11) Provide climbing vines along northerly wall with small openings in base of wall to encourage vines to grow on north side of wall to discourage graffiti. 12) Construct sidewalk connection, with lockable gate, for access to future Community Trail planned along the adjoining rail corridor to the north. 13) Provide decorative cap (i.e., stucco over) on stairways to match patio wall cap. 14) Replace vinyl lattice on carport ends with 2- to 3-inch metal tubing espalier. 15) Carport fascia profile and texture shall match apartments. 16) Garage door pattern shall be varied. 17) Replace wood lattice on Building 2A with 2- to 3-inch metal tubing espalier. 18) Add window on right-hand side of first floor of Building 2B. ./ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 DR FOR VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR January 8.1997 Page 4 19) Provide subtle stucco color variations, such as varying between buildings or using as accent on pop-out elements, Engineering Division 1 ) Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street, Hanley Avenue, shall be vacated and incorporated as part of the project. 2) Verification of ownership change or letter of intent from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency stating approval and pending ownership change for the property to the east, Assessors Parcel No. 227-111-12, under current ownership by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, as shown within the project boundary. 3) Construct Base Line Road full width from Day Creek Boulevard (future) to the existing limit of full-width improvements at Hanley Avenue, including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, asphalt paving, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, median island, bike trail (Class II), and all necessary transitions both east and west of the project limits, except as otherwise modified by the City Engineer, pursuant to City standards. Also, provide the following: a)Median island constructlop shall also include full landscaping in accordance with the Base Line Road Master Plan. b) Traffic Signal Improvements - install conduits (with pull rope), including interconnect conduit, pull boxes, and poles for future traffic signal at Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue. 4) Construct Hanley Avenue full width including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, asphalt paving, sidewalk, street lights, and street trees, pursuant to City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Parkway improvements may be deferred on the easterly side with the exception of street lights. The existing secondary access to Base Line Road shall be abandoned and the access realigned and constructed to Hanley Avenue as shown on the tentative tract map. Right-of-way dedication of 66 feet, including the cul-de-sac, as shown on the tentative tract map, shall be provided. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements along Hanley Avenue, as shown on the tentative tract map, and, if he/she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 DR FORVTT15766- MARK TAYLOR January 8,1997 Page 5 5) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all new street lights during the first six months of operation, pnor to building permit issuance or approval of the Final Map, whichever occurs first. 6) No median breaks will be allowed between Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard (future), except at Hanley Avenue. 7) Gated driveways are to be in accordance with the City's gated driveway entrance design guide for turnaround area. 8) Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue to be posted with R 26(s) "NO STOPPING ANY TIME" signs. 9) The sidewalk along the Hanley Avenue cul-de-sac shall be property-line adjacent. 10) On-site drainage shall be collected by a pdvate drainage facility to the satisfaction of the Building Official. Connection to a public drainage facility or outletting into the public right-of-way shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Building & Safety (:)ivisi0n 1) Provide private drainage easement at the north property line. No drainage over slope is allowed (see Section A-A); collect and discharge. Submit final hydrology report prior to issuance of any permits. 2) Proof of right-of-entry to do work, if there is any work on surrounding properties, shall be provided pdor to issuance of grading permit. 3) Positive drainage away from buildings shall be provided. Environmental Mitic~ation 1) Extend the existing storm drain in Base Line Road west of Hanley Avenue to connect with the catch basins at Victoria Station and remove the existing interim storm drains across Base Line Road. 2) Tree Removal Permit No. 96-13 is hereby approved and shall be valid for a period of 90 days starting from the date of final map recordation or issuance of any grading or building permits, whichever comes first, subject to extension by the Planning Division. Developer shall replace removed trees with Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum), minimum 15-gallon size, and spaced at 8 feet on center to maintain the windrow character along the northerly boundary. 3) Developer shall follow all recommendations of the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996), including, but not limited to, constructing 6-foot high sound barriers on all south facing private balconies of the five buildings along Base Line Road and special glazing for windows and sliding glass doors in certain units. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-02 DR FOR VT'T15766- MARK TAYLOR January 8,1997 Page 6 4) Install a stop sign for egress at the projecrs main entry to Base Line Road prior to occupancy. 5) Provide minimum 25-foot radius curb returns to Base Line Road at its intersection with project's main entry and with Hanley Avenue (Street "A"). 6) Provide a minimum 150-foot inbound left turn lane for eastbound left turn traffic at the intersection of Base Line Road and Hanley Avenue. 7) Construct Base Line Road full width on the northerly side from Hanley Avenue to the westedy tract boundary. 8) Developer shall contribute a fair share towards area-wide improvements. 9) Project shall be subject to Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distdct requirements for fire services. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 1997. PLANNI F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ifman A : I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January 1997 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT t 5766 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 264 APARTMENTS W/CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP APPLICANT: MARK TAYLOR, INC. LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~ Time Limits Comoletion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. The developer shall commence. participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities Distnct, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. sc- ~ o,~ 1 ~ Prolect No V'Fr 15766 Completion Date 4. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development I. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include __/ / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions __/__ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3, Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/__ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be __/ .... submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and stree~ improvement plans shall be coordinated for __/__ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or pdor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, __/__/__ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved __/__ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be __/__ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property __/__ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the __/__ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the sc-~o~ 2 /_.~ Projec~ No VTT ! 5766 Completion Date City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth __/__/__ from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall prohibit recreational vehicle parking on interior __/__/__ circulation aisles other than in designated recreational vehicle parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho / / Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily /__/__ residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping __/__/__ in this case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and sc-~o,~e 3 /,__~ Project No ~ 15766 ComOletion Date submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within __/ / the project: 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, and 80% - 15-gallon. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 4. All private slopes in 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope. but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irngated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5--gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For multi-family residential and non-residential development. property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public nght-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept flee from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing. mowing, and tnmming. Any damaged, dead. diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Special landscape features such as mounding. alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Base Line 9. Landscaping and inigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10,All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs, SC - ~0r96 4 /.___,~ Project No V'FT' 15766 Completion Date 2. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior __/ / to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the / / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location __ __/ of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical __ __/__ Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City __ __/__ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to __ __/__ perform such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. __/__ sc - ~oz96 5 Prolect No VET 15766 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline): 60 total feet on Base Line Road for Riqht TUrn Lane 66 total feet on Henley Avenue includino cul-de-$8C 2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Base Line Road. 3. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 4. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 5. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. L. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A.C. Side- Ddve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Base Line Road X X,b X,c X X X X,a X X Hanley Avenue X X X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined dunng plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per STD. 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. See Soecial Conditions. Project No VET 15766 Completion Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future s~gnal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing. street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect winng. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: ( 1 ) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours dunng construction, Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. sc- ~o~96 7 / (_~ / Pro~ect No V*~ 15766 Completion Date M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Distnct~ Median island on Ba~;e Line Road. 2. A sicjned consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Median island and parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of / the respective Beautification Master Plan: Base Linq Road. N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured __/ / from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, __ __/__ electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the __ __/ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardinn. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. __ 2. Fire flow requirement shall i~e 2,500 gallons per minute. / / a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __/__/__ personnel prior to water plan approval. 13. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. SC - 10/96 8 / ~ ProjeCt No V'T'T ! 5756 Completion Date 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required put31ic or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc,). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection, 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. __/__/ X Other: 1994 UnifOrm BUilding Code. __/ / Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of __ sprinkler system. 9, A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways. X Other: See attached Ordinance No. 22 for access/width re<=uiremqnl;~. 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. 12. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 13. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. 14. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: X Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s). sc-~ot~ 9 / Prolect No V'FT ~ 5756 Completion Date 15. Gatecl/restncted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire / / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 16. Plan check fees in the amount of $0 have been paid. An additional $125.00 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. / / Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, U FC, / / UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. __/ / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal secudty lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with /__/__ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / R. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doom. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3 All garage or rolling doom shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. S. Security Fencing 1. When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since fire and law enforcement can access these devices. T. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime __/__ __ visibility. sc-~o~ 10 //~/~L7/ Project NO VTT 15766 Completion Date 2. At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with / / vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance. including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. 3. All developments shall submit a 8 1/2" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant __/ / developments to the Potice Department. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND THE VACATION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH AND THE EAST COLLECTOR STREET KNOWN AS HANLEY AVENUE, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 96-13, WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227-111-12 & 13. A. Recitals. 1. Mark Taylor, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 1 and December 10, 1996, neighborhood meetings were conducted by the applicant to explain the proposed project to area residents and solicit their input. 3. On November 13, 1996, and continued to-January 8, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. Following conclusion of said hearings, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolutions 97-01 and 97-02 approving the application. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolutions was timely appealed to this Council. 5. On March 5, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Re~01utiOn. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this COuncil during the above- referenced public hearing on March 5, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 2 a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane, on property zoned for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), with a street frontage of 800 feet and lot depth of 1,100 feet and which presently contains an abandoned vineyard; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a 40-foot wide strip of vacant land known as "Railroad Avenue South" proposed to be vacated, to the north of Railroad Avenue South is an unused rail corridor that is 100 feet wide, and beyond are single family homes; the property to the south consists of a winery; the property to the east contains apartments and a shopping center; and the property to the west has a mini-storage facility; and c. The application contemplates the development of 264.condominium units, which the applicant has stated are intended to be rented as apartments for an undetermined length of time, at a density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre; and d. The project is proposed to include a vacant parcel owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency along the easterly boundary, which includes an easement for a rail spur proposed to be vacated; and e. The project design includes a 7-foot high sound attenuation wall along Base Line Road consistent with the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996); and f. The project design is consisteni with the Victoria Community Plan including, but not limited to, the use of the Victoria Community Plan's theme wall treatment along Base Line Road; and g. The vacation of Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street, known as Hanley Avenue, is consistent with the General Plan; and h. The project design includes a pdvate drainage system to collect all surface water runoff into catch basins that will connect with the public storm drain system; and I. The affected school districts have submitted wdtten comments consistent with the recommended conditions of approval requiring the developer to participate in the high school Mello-Roos Distdct and payment of school fees to the elementary school district; and j. The application, as proposed, conforms with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Development Code: ( 1 ) The proposed density of 11.19 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and the Victoria Community Plan's designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (2) The site plan arrangement provides a compatible transition of unit type and density from single family residential areas. The subject property is physically separated from single family residential areas by an unused rail corridor that is 100 feet wide. The site plan has been designed with buildings having a minimum 200-foot setback from the nearest single family residence and pad grades 11-12 feet lower than the single family residences to the north; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. VET 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 3 (3) The project design includes a minimum 20-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot high decorative wall around the perimeter; and (4) The project design meets or exceeds all development standards, including 57 percent common open space and 58 percent usable open space. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely tp cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearings, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5 (c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. / Lj2z/: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. V'Fr' 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 4 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Mark Taylor, Inc. that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Mark Taylor Inc. at the address identified in City records. 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 97o01. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH 1997. RESOLUTION NO. c~ 7~ ~-2,,_~~ 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227-111-12 & 13. A. ReCitals. 1. Mark Taylor, Inc. has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 1 and December 10, 1996, neighborhood meetings were conducted by the applicant to explain the proposed project to area residents and solicit their input. 3. On November 13, 1996, and continued to January 8, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public Plearings on the application. Following conclusion of said hearings, the Plannirig Commission adopted its Resolutions 97-01 and 97-02 approving the application. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolutions was timely appealed to this Council. 5. On March 5, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public headng on March 5, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoda Park Lane, on property zoned for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), with a street frontage of 800 feet and lot depth of 1,100 feet and which presently contains an abandoned vineyard; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is a 40-foot wide strip of vacant land known as "Railroad Avenue South" proposed to be vacated, to the north of Railroad Avenue South is an unused rail corridor that is 100 feet wide, and beyond are single family homes; the property to the south consists of a winery; the property to the east co ntains apartments and a shopping center; and the property to the west has a mini-storage facility; and c. The application contemplates the development of 264 condominium units, which the applicant has stated are intended to be rented as apartments for an undetermined length of time, at a density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre; and d. The project is proposed to include a vacant parcel owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency along the easterly boundary, which includes an easement for a rail spur proposed to be vacated; and e. The project design includes a 7-foot high sound attenuation wall along Base Line Road consistent with the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996); and f. The project design is consistent with the Victoria Community Plan including, but not limited to, the use of the Victoria Community Plan's theme wall treatment along Base Line Road; and g. The vacation of Railroad Avenge South and the east collector street, known as Hanley Avenue, is consistent with the General PlanLand h. The project design includes a pdvate drainage system to collect all surface water runoff into catch basins that will connect with the public storm drain system; and i. The affected school districts have submitted wdtten comments consistent with the recommended conditions of approval requiring the developer to participate in the high school Mello-Roos District and payment of school fees to the elementary school district; and j. The application, as proposed, conforms with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Development Code: ( 1 ) The proposed density of 11.19 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's' General Plan and the Victoria Community Plan designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (2) The site plan arrangement provides a compatible transition of unit type and density from single family residential areas. The subject property is physically separated from single family residential areas by an unused rail corridor that is 100 feet wide. The site plan has been designed with buildings having a minimum 200-foot setback from the nearest single family residence and pad grades 11-12 feet lower than the single family residences to the north; and (3) The project design includes a minimum 20-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot high decorative wall around the perimeter; and (4) The project design meets or exceeds all development standards, including 57 percent common open space and 58 percent usable open space. /7/ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; and b. The proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity and a mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 15766 and adopted by separate Resolution of this Council. 4. This Council hereby provides notice to Mark Taylor, Inc. that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 5. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho C.ucamonga is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Mark Taylor, Inc. at the address identified in City records. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-02. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH 1997. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN/ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5. 1997 TO: Mayor Alexander and Members of the City Council Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota. Community Services Manager SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON THE TRAVELING VIETNAM MEMORIAL PROJECT Phil DiDio from V.F.W. Post 8680 reported to City staff that the sponsor application fi3rm to bring the Vietnam Veterans Memorial to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 1998 is still under review. Chairman John Devitt of the Vietnam Combat Veterans, Ltd., advises that they have received a large number of applications for the Moving Wall Memorial. He hopes to have the review of the applications completed sometime in March 1997. Mr. DiDio indicated that he will be contacting Mr. Devitt in early March and will advise the City of the status of the application request. Respectfully submitted.~ ,t "'~Suzann Ott?~ervices Manager SO/kls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez. Community Development Director BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE LIONS CENTER EAST AND WEST PROJECTS - INFORMATION ONLY LIONS EAST The renovations at Lions East are proceeding with only minor delays experienced due to weather. To date. all rough framing for the interior walls is complete with most of the drywall in place; the rough electrical is nearly complete with conduit and boxes set for the fire alarm system; the roofing on the flat roof is complete; and roofing on the sloped tile area has been removed, decking repairs are being made and the new tile roof is schedulea for installation. Completion of the renovation is still anticipated prior to June 1. The project is within budget. LIONS WEST Plans for the Lions West improvements are being ~naled and will be submitted for final plan check in mid-March. We anticipate proceeding to City Council for authorization to advertise the project on April 16 with bid opening scheduled on June 17. Award of the Project is scheduled for thefirst City Council meeting in July. Res e tFully Rici Con~ RG:WJO:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5. 1997 TO: Mayor Alexander and Members of the City Council .lack Lam, AICP. City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: REPORT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF A VAN TO BE AVAILABLE AT THE SENIOR CENTER TO TRANSPORT SENIORS FOR THE NUTRITION PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider the van and transportation alternatives described below and provide staff with direction on addressing van and transportation needs for senior citizens. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The following is an overview of altematives available to the City in providing the van and enhanced transportation services for bringing senior citizens to the City's Nutrition Program. CITY OPERA TED SENIOR VAN SER VICES One alternative to enhance senior transportation services would be for the City, to purchase a city van to transport senior citizens to the City' s Nutrition Program. The van would need to have some type of a handicap lift equipment to allow wheelchairs onto the vehicle. These are specialized types of vehicles and staff would need to contact vendors who can provide this type of vehicle. In addition, a City staff would be needed to drive the vehicle and office support staff would be needed for dispatching services to coordinate transportation reservations for this program. The City would coordinate liability insurance requirements with the City's Risk Manager. O,'~INITRANS VAN SERVICES A second alternative would be to contact Ommtrans to determine if the City 's transportation services for senior citizens could be expanded. If additional services are not available under the City's existing agreement with Omnitrans, an altemative would be to determine if the City could contract for additional transportation services (e.g., Charter van services). PRIVATE BUS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES A third altemative would be to contact private bus companies such as Laidlaw to determine if they can provide a van transportation service. A private contract service would include the maintenance and operations costs for the van, the driver and dispatcher, and liability insurance expenses. ,. REPORT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF A VAN TO BE AVAILABLE AT THE SENIOR CENTER TO TRANSPORT SENIORS FOR THE NUTRITION PROGRAM March 5. 1997 Page 2 L 0C.4 L PRIt24 TE .4 ?vD PUBLIC SCHOOL B US SER I~TCES A tburth alternative would be to contact local private and or public schools to see if the City could contract with them tbr services during non-peak school hours provided that these hours coincide with the transportation service periods needed for the Senior Center. SEA,70R t,'OL 65VTEER DRIVER PROGRAM Lastly. some cities have developed Senior Volunteer Driver Programs where the van or transportation vehicles are provided by the City and seniors volunteer to drive and provide dispatch services to bring seniors to and from the Center. In these instances, the City provides liability insurance coverage tbr the program. Supplemental liability insurance may also be available through senior citizen organizations and for volunteer drivers. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost for providing a van or vehicle transportation service for the senior citizens would be developed once all the information for each alternative has been researched. Federal, State and local revenue sources for these types of services would also need to be researched and evaluated. A~SC~Services Manager SO/kls Attachment 1RANSPORTATION SERVICES CURRENTLY PROVIDED TO THE SENIOR CENTER NUTRITION PROGRAM HOME BOUND MEALS VAN For those seniors who are homebound and unable to come to the Senior Center tbr the Nutrition Program. the Old Timers Foundation van, which the City donated to the Nutrition Program last year. delivers 71 meals to homebound seniors. NUTRITION VAN San Bemardino County Office of Aging provides curb-to-curb service to seniors via a contract with Omnitrans. Omnitrans provides one 18-passenger van to transport seniors to and ti'om the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. This sen'ice is free to seniors as long as they are on the list. The list is recommended by Nellie Ayala. the Nutrition Site Manager of the Old Timers Foundation. The service is limited to Omnitrans non-peak time ridership hours of roughly 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Currently there are 19 seniors on the list who are transported to the Nutrition Program. The Nutrition Van, as it is called, is used primarily by those truly elderly who cannot drive. However. the service is not limited by disability. Anyone can use the service as long as there is space available on the list and the Nutrition Site Manager recommends the rider. The rider must fill out a confidential Client Intake Form which is sent to the Office of Aging for approval. Individuals who are low income or handicapped are more likely to be approved by the Office of Aging. ACCESS ACCESS is a service provided by Omnitrans for individuals with disabilities. To use ACCESS daily, an individual must have an ADA Certification Card. If the rider only has an approved disabilit),' card, they may use ACCESS but only on a space available basis. The dispatcher must be called the day before to schedule the ride. The service operates between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday, and is a curb-to-curb service. DIAL-A-CAB Dial-A-Cab is a subsidized public transportation service using the local taxi. The service is available to seniors or the disabled as long as they have the Omnitrans Senior/Disability Card. Dial A Cab operates as a regular taxi where the individual can call the same day for service. The cost per trip is $.85 tbr the first 2.5 miles. If the trip is longer, the passenger is responsible tbr the amount at the regular cab fare. The cost is based on per trip, not per person, so the ride may be shared with another person. Dial-A-Cab is also a curb-to-curb service. FIXED ROUTE BUS This is the traditional bus service where the rider waits at a designated bus stop until the bus comes. East bound sen'ice on Arrow Route drops seniors off by the Senior Center. West bound sen'ice lets off across from the Senior Center but requires walking to and crossing Archibald and walking back on the south side of Arrow to get to the center. Archibald stops are not in close proximity to the Senior Center. 177 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5.1997 TO: Mayor and Members ol' the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE "Y" PROPERTY NEXT TO MILLIKEN PAlhK - INFORMATION ONLY Brief History_ 1. The YMCA was to build a 2.75 acre site adjacent to Milliken Park. On November 10, 1986, the City entered into a "Declaration for Facilities Lease Agreement" with the West End Young Mens Christian Association (YMCA). This Declaration was simply a conceptual "agreement-to-agree" for a lease agreement to provide an additional two (2) acres of parkland for shared parking. The Declaration contains provisions regarding the lease premises, terms of the agreement, facility design and development, as well as operation. 2. On April 26, 1989, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 11286, submitted by Lewis Homes, for the purpose of subdividing real property into three parcels, including the Milliken Park lm~d and the parcel proposed to be dedicated for the YMCA facility. Included as conditions to the tentative parcel map approval are the customary requirements for public improvements (streets, flood control, etc.). 3. On April 26, 1989, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 88-42, submitted by the West End YMCA, for the development of the YMCA facility. Along with normal conditions for site development and construction of public improvements, the approval was granted subject to an amendment to the Terra Vista Community plan to redesignate the YMCA site for park development. A total credit of .1 !.45 acres was provided for the Milliken Park/YMCA site. 4. On September 5, 1990, Parcel Map 11286 showing Parcel 2, the Milliken Park site (6.695 acres), and Parcel 3 (4.750 acres), reflecting the combined 2.00 acre site and the additional park dedication of the 2.75 acre "YMCA" site, is approved and accepted by the City Council. 5. Because the YMCA did not move forward with it's plans, Lewis Homes dedicated the site as parkland and received park credit. On October 20, 1993, the Grant Deed for Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 11286 was recorded with the County Recorder, transferring ownership from Lewis Homes to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. -, j Page 2 Update On The Status of the "Y" Site STAFF REPORT 6. In 1994, the City expanded the Milliken Park parking lot onto the 2.00 acre site. This expansion incorporated the design for the shared parking facility between Milliken Park and the original YMCA site which was developed as a part of the original master plan for the future YMCA thcility. As a result of the Master Plan approval for development of the YMCA, the vehicle is available to approve a conditional use permit for providing temporary modules on the site for recreation purposes. These modules would be approved as long as they are in compliance with design requirements already established and followed by schools and churches, they are not located in the area designated for Phase I development, and they would be removed after a stipulated amount of time. Because this property is now City owned parkland, any development of this property by any organization other than the City must be done through special agreement. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Conm~unity Development Director CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1997 TO: Mayor Alexander and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: REPORT ON THE PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE The following is a summary of the bid process which took place in 1994 for the printing of The Grapevine. The bids were advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and bid notification was also made to interested vendors on the City's mailing list. Holiday Printing was awarded the printing bid with I.B. Litho being awarded the pre-press bid (see attached memo). The pre-press work includes cover design, clip art graphics and artistic work, scanning photographs, etc. In 1995, software enhancements were made to the City's graphic computer and the pre-press contract was terminated. All Grapevine preparation is currently being done by City staff and Holiday Printing. In 1991 the printing of The Grapevine was awarded to Alpha Design, a local vendor within the City. Due to the size of The Grapevine production, Alpha Design was not able to print The Grapevine in- house and contracted out the printing. In 1994 Alpha Design bid the pre-press work (cover design, scanning photos, etc.). However, this work was awarded to I.B. Litho based upon graphic equipment and artistic design capabilities. The Community Services Department is working with Purchasing to go out to bid this Spring on The Grapevine. Currently 53,000 copies of The Grapevine are printed quarterly. The total annual printing cost is $64,412, with an average printing cost of 30 cents per copy. The average total cost, including mailing and postage, is 43 cents per copy. ~~}aServices Manager SO/kls Attachment MEMORANDUM Date: February 1, 1994 To: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent From: Nettle Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician Subject: 1994 Grapevine Bid Proposals The listings below are the bid proposals that we received: Pre-Press Proposal Total Bid (4 issues) Accent Business Forms $2,000.00 Phoenix Press 4,492.00 Marrs Printing .4,624.00 * I.B. Litho 5,000.00 Alpha Design 5,,520.00 Advanced Business Forms 8,119.00 Norstar Printing 44,860.00 Printing Proposal · Total Bid (4 issues) Hogar Printing $25,616.00 Southwest Offset Press 26,760.00 Trend Offset Printing 37,760.00 ,Holiday Printing 37,904.00 Harmony & Assoc. 39,200.00 Norstar 40,760.00 M & M Productions 43,560.00 Sinclair Printing 45,428.00 Accent Business Forms 50,700.00 Inkspot 51,044.00 Adv. Business Graphics 55,880.00 I.B. Litho 56,536.00 Business Printing 65,200.00 Phoenix Press 65,660.00 Marrs Printing 67,680.00 Crown Printers 69,040.00 * Vendors receiving bid awards. Grapevine Bid Proposal February 1, 1994 page two We reviewed all proposals and selected two of the lowest priced vendors that met our qualifications in each category to interview: LB. Litho, Alpha Design, Holiday Printing, and Inkspot. I.B. Litho located in Montclair, submitted an impressive proposal. We interviewed the company owner, Isreal Borges, we reviewed samples, confirmed that he has the compatible equipment and could perform the required services. He has the capability to either scan photos or shoot them as haLftones, which will ensure a higher quality product. Isreal has been in the graphics business for 10 years and has many years of experience with designing brochures. We interviewed Predeep Bhaumik, owner of Alpha Design and Graphics, located in Rancho Cucamonga. Predeep has worked with the City on The Grapevine in the past. He has the proper compatible electronic equipment, although he lacks the ability to shoot photos as a halftone. When we worked with him in the past it is our opinion that Predeep did not have the graphic creativity to design our covers adequately. We are recommending selection of I.B. Litho based on his experience, presentation, versatility of equipment and willingness to deliver and pick-up from City Hall. References were checked, design work has been done for Foldco, who highly recommended I.B. Litho. We recommend that a decisior' be made quickly and a meeting with the new vendor be set for early next week so that we can adhere, to our existing timeline. We visited Holiday Printing in City of Industry. We met with Bob Schluter, the owner, and his sales manager. We toured the entire facility, including the press area, electronic pre-press, manual pre-press and bindery area. If we needed last minute pre-press changes, his company has the ability to complete the changes. We observed current jobs being done at that time and examined the quality of their work. Bob was confident that his company could complete the job within our timeline. He referred us to other cities with whom he does newsletters for that we are welcome to contact for references. The sales manager fives in Rancho Cucamonga and is familiar with our newsletter, he is willing to deliver and pick-up from City Hall. We also toured the Inkspot in Ontario. The company and facility is very large. The salesperson, Karen Delfs was to meet with us but was unable to make it and Kirk James, sales manager met with us instead. He had no knowledge of our bid package but gave us a quick tour of the company. Their operation is primarily geared towards high-end four-color glossy publications. We are recommending selection of Holiday Printers based on our observations at their facility. We feel they are big enough to handle The Grapevine but not too big that our account would get lost. They are enthusiastic about upgrading the quality of the printing of The Grapevine. We contacted the City of Rialto current customer of Holiday Printing, they spoke highly of Holiday Printing's work and service. We recommend that a decision be made quickly and a meeting be set for the new vendor earl~ next week so that we can adhere to our existing timeline. cc: Joan Kruse, Pruchasing Agent Accent Business Forms Phoenix Press Advance Business Graphics Mike Lundy 2772 Main Street Thomas Deegan 19059 Valley Blvd.. Unit 212 Newport Beach, CA 92714 3810 Wabash Drive Bloomington, CA 92316 Mira Loma, CA 91752-1134 Norstar Printing Corp. Alpha Design &Graphics Ink Spot Michael Mullens 9540 Center Avenue, Suite 130 Karen Delfs 1425 E. Holt Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1493 E. Philadelphia Street Pomona. CA 91767 Ontario, CA 91761 Hogar Publishing Co., Inc. Southwest Offset Press Trend Offset Printing 510 Birch Street Lee Angel 3722 Catalina Street Colton, CA 92324 13630 Gramercy Place Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Gardena, CA 90249-2465 Harmony Associates M & M Productions/J.W. Graphics I.B. Litho Clair Harmony 357 E. Arrow Highway 9461 Felipe Court P.O. Box 4153 San Dimas, CA 91773 Montclair, CA 91763 r':~mond Bar, CA 91765 The Business Printing Company Phoenix Press Marrs Printing, Inc. Michael Noble Maura Barkouras Joseph Cantone 11933 Los Nietos Road 2772 Main Street 860 Tucker Lane Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Irvine, CA 92714 City of Industry, CA 91789 Crown Printers Graphics Unlimited Sinclair Printing Company Mike Bmsig Stan Schroeder Joe Benites 250 W. Rialto Avenue 43171 Business Park Drive 4005 Whiteside San Bemardino, CA 92408 Temecula, CA 92590 Los Angeles, CA 90063 PROCLAMATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING- MARCH 5TH: 1. Presentation of Proclamation to Marc Tang and Corinne Baker commending them for their CPR efforts in saving the life of Mrs. Baker's husband. RECIPIENTS: MARC TANG, CORINNE BAKER. 2. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the Month of March 97' as American Red Cross Month. RECIPIENT: JIM LAWRY. 3. Presentation of Proclamation to Cpt. Ron Bieberdorf. RECIPIENT: RON BIEBERDORF. 4. Presentation of Proclamation commemorating the Sesquicentennial of the Mormon Pioneers' entering of the region. RECIPIENT: RICHARD HOLDAWAY TO INTRODUCE STATE PRESIDENT OF THE MORMON CHURCH, JOHN COTTOM. 5. Plaque awarded to Tony Steams, Citizen Volunteer of the Year, 1996 for his comittment as a Citizen Patrol member for 4 years and 3,000+ hours of donated time to our community. RECIPIENT: TONY STEARNS. "' ~N..~)J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT \ MAP NO. 15766, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT FOR 264 ', APARTMENTS ON 22.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND THE VACATION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH AND THE EAST COLLECTOR STREET KNOWN AS HANLEY AVENUE, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 96-13, WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-14 & 15 AND 227-111-12 & 13. A. ReCitals. 1. Mark Taylor, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."' 2. On October 1 and December 10, 1996, neighborhood meetings were conducted by the applicant to explain the proposed project to area residents and solicit their input. 3. On November 13, 1996, and continued to J. anuary 8, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. Following conclusion of said heanngs, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolutions 97-01 and 97-02 approving the application. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolutions was timely appealed to this Council. 5. On March 5, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this COuncil during the above- referenced public hearing on March 5, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. V"T'F 15766 - MARK TAYLOR. INC. March 5, 1997 Page 2 a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 800 feet west of Victoria Park Lane, on property zoned for Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), with a street frontage of 800 feet and lot depth of 1,100 feet and which presently contains an abandoned vineyard; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is a 40-foot wide strip of vacant land known as "Railroad Avenue South" proposed to be vacated, to the north of Railroad Avenue South is an unused rail corridor that is 100 feet wide, and beyond are single family homes; the property to the south consists of a winery; the property to the east contains apartments and a shopping center; and the property to the west has a mini-storage facility; and c. The application contemplates the development of 264*condominium units, which the applicant has stated are intended to be rented as apartments for an undetermined length of time, at a density of 11.9 dwelling units per acre; and d. The project is proposed to include a vacant parcel owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency along the easterly boundary, which includes an easement for a rail spur proposed to be vacated; and e. The project design includes a 7-foot high sound attenuation wall along Base Line Rci d co istent with the acoustical analysis (Bricken, August 22, 1996); and ~ ~teni with the V~an includin~ g. The vacation of Railroad Avenue South and the east collector street, known as Hanley Avenue, is consistent with the General Plan; and h. The project design includes a private drainage system to collect all surface water runoff into catch basins that will connect with the public storm drain system; and I. The affected school districts have submitted written comments consistent with the recommended conditions of approval requiring the developer to participate in the high school Mello-Roos District and payment of school fees to the elementary school district; and j. The application, as proposed. conforms with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Development Code: ( 1 ) The proposed density of 11.19 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and the Victoda Community Plan's designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and (2) The site plan arrangement provides a compatible transition of unit type and density from single family residential areas. The subject property is physically separated from single family residential areas by an unused rail corridor that is 100 feet wide. The site plan has been designed with buildings having a minimum 200-foot setback from the nearest single family residence and pad grades 11-12 feet lower than the single family residences to the north; and 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. V'Ff' 15766 - MARK TAYLOR. INC March 5.1997 Page 3 (3) The project design includes a minimum 20-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot high decorative wall around the perimeter; and (4) The project design meets or exceeds all development standards, including 57 percent common open space and 58 percent usable open space. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract i__s consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely tp cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written' and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearings, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5 (c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. VTT 15766 - MARK TAYLOR, INC. March 5, 1997 Page 4 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Mark Taylor, Inc. that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Mark Taylor Inc. at the address identified in City records. 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 above, this Council hereby approves the applicatio,~j,~the co_ndit:ained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-01. PASSED, APPROVED AND AIOPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH 1997. WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING: ASSEMBLY BILL 244 (AB244) IF YOU ARE IN SUPPORT OF OUR BILL, PLEASE CONTACT: ASSEMBLYMAN FRED AQUIAR BY MAIL: ASSE~IBL~z)IAN FRED AQUIAR STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 942849 SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-0001 BY FAX: SACRA)IENTO (916) 445..I ONTARIO (909) 984-6695 BY PHONE: SACRAMENTO (916) 445-1670 ONTARIO (9c~9) 984-7741 E--%L~L Cred.a~ui:lr '. 5 you have questions or would like to discuss this bill with me(Tom Rhodes) you can reach me: BY PHONE OR FAX: RANCFIO CUCA~MONGA (909) 481--91~ O~ BY MAIL: TONI R!tODES P.O. BOX 3794 RANCFIO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 E-MAIL: tonir~deltanet. com IT IS IMPORTANT TO SEND YOUR SUPPORT LETTERS ASAP SO THAT THEY CAN BE HAND CARRIED INTO COMMITFEE. WE ALSO NEED YOU TO CONTACT YOUR LOCAL ASSEMBLYPERSON WITH A LETTER OF SUPPORT AND ASK YOUR FRIENDS TO JOIN IN. COUPLES AND FAMILY MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO WRITE INDIVIDUAL LETTERS. THIS IS SUCH A CRITICAL BILL. IT IS ABOUT FAMILIES BEING ABLE TO LIVE TOGETHER UNDER THE SAME ROOF ONCE THE IF SON OR DAUGHTER WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES BECOMES AN ADULT, WE ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE THAT GOOD COMMUNITY PLACEMENT PLAYS A VERY ESSENTIAL ROLE IN TODAY'S SOCIETY. ALL TOO OFTEN WE DON'T LIVE FN THE EXTENDED FAMILY STRUCTURE OF DAYS GONE BY. THERE ARE NO OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS LIVING IN OUR HOME TO MEET THE NEEDS OF OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AND MANY OF US ARE SINGLE PARENTS OR PARENTS WHO BOTH MUST WORK TO PROVIDE FOR OUR FANlILIES. WHEN MY DAUGHTER CHRISTY BECAME AN ADULT WE WENT THROUGH A LIVING HELL TO STAY TOGETHER. THE REGIONAL CENTER MADE MORE MONEY IF SHE WAS PLACED IN THE COMN1UNITY. I WAS HARASSED BY THE INLAND REGIONAL CENTER TO PLACE HER IEN THE COMMUNITY SO THAT SHE COULD HAVE HER INDEPENDENCE. IF SHE WERE PLACED IN THE COMMUNITY THERE WOULD BE FUNDS TO MEET HER NEEDS WE WERE TOLD. TOTAL STRANGERS SOME OF THEM FELONS WOULD BE PAID TO PROVIDE THE SLIPPORT MY DAUGHTER NEEDED. MY DAUGHTER LIVES EN A WONDERFUrL COMMUNITY THAT KNOWS HER WELL AND RESPECTS HER AS A PERSON AND IS MORE THAN WILLLNG TO MEET HER NEEDS AND THOSE OF OTHERS EN OUR COMMUNITY WITH DISABILITIES. OUR CO}IMUNITY IS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, YOU WOULD BE HAD PRESSED TO FIND ANYONE AT CITY tL~kLL THAT HEADS AN3( DEPART~IENT THAT DOES NOT ICNOW MY DAUGHTER CHRISTY NURMELA. OIYR COMMUNITY HAS ADAPTED THE DOORS TO CITY HALL SO THAT ME,~IBERS OF OUR COM.~IUNITY W'HO HAPPEN TO BE IN x,~vtlEEL CHAIRS CAN G..tL"N' ACCESS. OUR CO.~I}IUNITY ASSISTED CHRISTY AND I EN ESTABLISHING A TENNIS CLASS FOR PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. OUR CO~IMUNITY ASSISTED CHRISTY AND I LN HAVING A RAMP BUILT AT OUR EQUESTRL~,N CENTER SO THAT AN ADULT IN A WHEEL CHAIR OR WHO NEEDED SOME ASSISTANCE COULD MOUNT A HORSE. NO PERSON ON THE FACE OF THIS EARTH HAS A GREATER STAKE EN MY DAUGHTER'S ABILITY TO BECOME AS INDEPENDENT AS POSSIBLE TITAN I DO BECAUSE I ~VILL NOT LIVE FOREVER AND I WORK HARD EVERYDAY TO ,MAKE SURE THAT CHRISTY BECO}IES AS LNDEPENDENT AS HU1MANLY POSSIBLE. I A~I NOT UNIQUE LN THIS AS MANY MANY FAMILIES ARE FACENG THE SA}IE STRUGGLE I AM TO KEEP MY DAUGHTER AT HOI~IE, HER HOME, WHERE SHE WANTS TO BE AND WHERE SHE HAS A PARENT THAT WILL LOVE AND REALLY CARE ABOUT AND FOR HER. MY DAUGHTER IS NON VERBAL AND I HAD TO FIGHT FOR FIVE LONG YEARS TO EVEN GET HER A COMMUNICATION DEVICE. THIS BILL WILL NOT COST THE SYSTEM MORE MONEY BUT IT WILL ~IAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR MORE FAMILIES TO STAY TOGETHER AND GIVE THE PERSON WITH THE DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY THE BEST POSSIBLE SHOT AT LIFE AND SELF RESPECT. AS YOU READ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION PLEASE REMEMBER THAT WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT LITTLE CI-IH.DREN HERE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR ADULT CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES WHO REQUIRE CONSTANT CARE. I HAVE SEEN AND HEARD TOO MANY STORIES OF SEXUAL, PHYSICAL AND VERBAL ABUSE THAT OCCURS IN COMMUNITY PLACE~IENT AND SO HAVE MOST OF YOU. IT IS THE SAME ABUSE THAT IL.~S OCCURRED IN NURSLNG HOMES FOR DECADES. IN NURSING HOtMES THIS HAPPENS TO PEOPLE THAT CAN SPEAK. YOUR SUPPORT OF THIS BIlL IS YOU STANDING UP FOR FA.MIlIES AND PEOPLE '~'ITH DISABIliTIES IN THIS STATE. CHRISTY AND I .M~E VERY GRATEFUL FOR YOUR TI~ME AND PRAY THAT YOU WILL SUPPORT OR BIlL. / THANKS AND G! ~D BLESS, CHRISTY NUR.M~LA AND HER MO~I TONI RHODES 02/04/97 5: 06 PM 09~ 64 RN9703067 PAGE 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST Bill No. as introduced, Aguiar. General Subject: Developmentally disabled adults. Existing law requires the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers for the provision of services to persons with developmental disabilities according to specified criteria. Existing law authorizes regional centers to contract with vendors for the provision of supportive living services to consumers. Existing regulations provide that a consumer who is at least 18 years of age is eligible for supportive living services if, among other things, he or she is living in a home that is not the place of residence of his or her parent or conservator. This bill would provide that the parent of an adult consumer is eligible for vendoriza~ion as a prorider of supportive living services whether or not the consumer is living in the place of residence of the parent. 02/04/97 s :06 09164 RN9703067 PAGE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 4689.01 is added to the Welfare and Institutions code, to read: 4689.0~. The parent of an adult consumer is eligible for vendorization as a prorider of supportive living services whether or not the consumer is living in the place of residence of the parent. - 0 - ~0/~0 ..j ~E: ~ l 666 r -so-asJ 97-006 For inLmediate release Contact: Jeffrey Hemrig February 11, 1997 (909) 984-7741 Aguiar proposes assistance for parents who care for their disabled children Sacramento --,Inland Empire Assemblyman Fred Aguiar (R-61 st District) announced today the introduction of AB 244, a measure designed to assist families who care for adult children with developmental disabilities. Under current law, parents whose adult cltildren live at home and require Supportive Living Services are not eligible to be classified as a 'provider' by the state because they live under the same roof as the child. As a result, they are precluded from being compensated for their services. "The state will pay a total stranger to care for the disabled person. However, if that disabled person lives at home, the state won't compensate the clxild's ox~ parents to provide the same care," AgLLiar said. "It just doesn't make sense." Aguiar introduced this measure on behalf of Toni Rhodes, a Rancho Cucamonga resident, and or_her parents who care for their disabled children. The financial burden of caring for these children is sizeable. "To provide fbr her daughter Christy, Toni had to give up her job. The dedication and compassion that she has tbr her daughter is remarkable. The state should recognize the inil~ortance of keeping families intact and compensate her in the same way that it would any other care giver," Aguiar stated. By denying parents the ability to provide services to their own children, the state makes it nearly impossible for such families to stay together. For many parents, the only viable alternative is to place their children in group homes or institutions once they reach adulthood. "If the state pays a stranger to provide services to Cltristy," Aguiar said "the money is spent elsewhere. If Toni is paid for providing services to Chrsity, the money goes right back into her daughter's home. This is a common sense, pro-family, pro-consumer proposal and I look forward to working with Toni and Christy to make this proposal a reality." Aguiar concluded. TOTAL P.O1 Daily Bulletin J~l I '1~ $1,00 IMpel tax ~'~ ~, ~ ~ SERVING THE C~MUNITIES ~ CHINO * CHINO HILLS * C~RE~NT * DIA~NO BAR * FONTANA · LAVERNE * ~C~IR * ~TARIO * PO~ · R~C~C~ · ~ Ol~ * UP~D FOR THE LOVE 0F HER Domestic DAUGHTER violence targeted A mother's tenacity has helped her cerebral o,,.~ ,.,.~. ., .~_ palsy-stricken child get ~' ~' ~""" ~ S E C 0 N D Oki h~ a ~. the best care possible -v,o,... ,. ~,...~ it'e e;e inet I I~ ~e or I s~nI-H A L F er.' ~ Citme iun~i~ C~ju~ ......... uni ~t,d~ ~tn~t' b~ the microphone with an ~- - 'l'h~ 15 ~ me.m~r~ ~he w~ a~ut to t~ ~nch, hb~ally ~n fur n ~d~.~ ~uirntc~ in tht'ir ~al~ or ndh~ their Mnc~l~t lttitu~ ~w~ doma~ ' e)c.~ They knew they we~ in for a ~uting viule~ ~. '1 d.n't think the pu~,n~ uh~mld harp t. a~l~ ~at'w t~ nt~tl ~ ~ ~ ~ze liar the. time we take bert,," l{h~dt.~ ~.id u~er b~ak.' Oki ~. t.:~' pa~,nt m~kr tu the ~ ~ld u~[uglzt~tl Ibr W~ ~ve ~y buEe~ taking t,.~ much time, j~ with criti~m ~y e~ i~n- Hh,~e~'~6-yeur~lddaughter Chn~ty Nurmela MaUve ~d laa u~.~d~ ia i~ a client .rthe ColttNI-bt~ lnl;md Rt,gi,,,ml Can. ~ v~A~ m. tar. N.rmela h~ ce~,br~l pttl.y. '1 thi~ it'a just · few ju~. ~r- ~ht. ~tate and t~lemJl~ rund~ c~.zttt, r wu~N ha~,' ~id Oki, w~ m domes- wiUt 1~ 5~ [umilles urdevelupmentaih' <li~;,bl~d tic viobn~ ~ at ~ ~,ple in ~ve~ide, ~an ~'rnuNhm, Mun..lid Cth'ml ih,,'. t~Hntit~ tu ~lbr them t.~ucati.n;d. IK. alth But. ~ ~, "! lup~ we ;lad .~'ial x.n'i~. N.n ~ven ~y f~mal ~at~ m Two ~ I ...k Rheas. a R.nc'h,, Cuc.umunga ~iclunt, dealing with ~tic vio~.* yM~ a~, ~ ~ a truer ~orkers of tbr~ng her daugh~r's si~atu~ In ~ ~iM County, two ~ve, ~ Ith,~es' dissutisfacti,.~ with the ~n~r k~ her u~ j~ the la~t .tudi~ and infor- bm~y ~ ~ 3u~ Conaumers Unit~. u~ try u, chan~ the ~'ay the Following the QJ. $im~ mur- t~'nk, r delivers and ~l~.rd ~i~8. der t~al. rome ~nsb~ of ~ [epl ~ ~ wat~ ~mc view Rh~ ~ a chronic ~mplainer. ~h- ~mmunity a~ ~i~ publ~ ~n- e~r ~. ~ aunt. Either way, ~ is making her p~n~ ~ Do le rips Clinton ~ ~ODE~A4 Her struggle might for FBI file fiasco rehabilitate system -.. ~ t~ Whi~ ~m~,ni~ hew ~ d~r and h~.r ex. ~e duliv~ i affi~ ati~ Mark h~ wuntc~ ~r ~ in~titut~nali~ her ~tu~uy ~ ~ C]~n ~lnin- d a. m i. m e d 18-n.mth~ld dasher, Ch~sty Nurm~h,. when intm~ over d~ ~t a Dole'~ cum- Nurmela we. di~n~ with ~,bral i~alsy. Whim HouN aide obtained men~ u =wild 'l ~fu~ ~ ~ iL" ~id ~es, 52. of ~n~ ~t ~1 ~ ~ ~i~[ ~a~- C~'am~gm. 'I wau~ b~ show my ~sus th.t wl~n m ~ I ~pb, ~l~iq m~y e s ' ' a n d riht thi.g ~ ~ is pmvi~ it.' ~ ~ h~ i deputy ~he w~ like u little r~dull. S~Mn't.en hen~n." ~ie Mid. ~11~ ~ paip manager Arm ~wis .itup.'Rh,~.uid'But)',mcan'tju.t6,~ett~y Pn~identClinm~a~. br~h~ ~ ~e all for an wen. I~rn u~ ~'k them up? 'i ~mbr WIM~," ~ Rh~w i~ now di~'4;~t~ f~m her h~; ~e Dole, who was ~publicen ~ ~i ~ws ~ ~t on~ claim~l~M.'thua:dletheat~s~o~Mkmgca~ PartF chairman when that ~ain ~n. ~le h~ uftheirda~itt~,r. W~i~t~ ~.ndal bake in the early ~i~ve ~ gy n~ut ~ Overt~year~.gh~c~h~plann~mu~h.~r Ch~s~Nu~g~u~;M~tr~w~r~awi~ 19T~.-~l~h~thep record or his vieion for A, Christy/fro,, Rhodes i,f. ....d h.. ..........th .....,, ....., ..... -.ility. s~.'... ,,~,., ~ d ....Where to call~o~ ~ ~.~ho c ........~.. /f[O~ A1 up ~up~ fi}r T~)'e~ aftd But ~mim~trative ~w Judge Taxiing Consumers Unik~. a . . e ,;; , , e .. ~ .S~p~n E. HueIt sid~ with with disabilities aren't Ning pup el~'s form~ that ~k~ t- ~' ap~ ~ have the ~n~r H~ad~ly. ]t's~mething chan~thewnyherdaugh~rand ITM~Ir~2S buy a mmmuni~tiun device rot Numela. HueIt, h~er, al~ thatn~M~chan~.' other ~ple wi~ disabilities mffi~~. a~ ~es' ha~h carl- Her fretration ud a~er with ~ive ~it~. ~ ~ M~ ~ a system ~e ~liev~ worb ~ ~t~' n,~ivution Ihr starling c~m of~e sya~m. limit the abili~ea of ~ple with the o~ani~ntion ~ms from her~ ~ ~ ~ "No one he~ wan~ ~ harm inde~nden~ w~ evident w~n ~ ~n~r, a ~ and f~- ~ ~ ~ ~. ,e~ ~up~.' Huult wm~ in h~ shea~up~s~ataNnt emily f~ ~n~r from wh~ MI~:{~)3~. January decision. 'Christy m~ti~. her dau~h~r ~iv~ s~iali~ d~n, ~r than the fin~er ~he fiat question I have ~n~ ~d ~uipmenL Nntin~ a~ a~tmns and ~night ~, 'b ~m a vulgar ~ work~ full time until t~et~ate~ut.' ~a~ or a ~a~ ~at'e ~id? = Nu~ela ~r~uu~ fn,n high No one, however. di~pute~ ~h~es gid. ~ in ~1. ~' dt~otiun M her daugh~r. 'Strictly volun~r," ~s~nd~ On~ Nt o~ ~1, Nubia I~~ ~ ~he'e ~n a ~al champion tbr ~a~ mem~r Shells Hen~quez. ~e ~ing ~e few ~r skilb T~ ~ ~ ~ her dauber." ~ Ma~ ~yd, ~r in ~e m~ti~, ~ s~ h~ ~ui~, Rh~, ~id. ~n~m~ ~ard n~m~r or the Inland mem~r Ma~ ~yd add~ 8he wu more irH~ble thm~ ~~'~ ~gional Center who Rh~es'~n~e. ~u~ and ~ld her m~er ,he a~~m ~ with all ufgh~em' 'We'~ he~ ~au~ we care," mi~ ~. ~al n mm ~. ~ ~io~ fur cl~. said ~yd, a ~ti~ chie~ e~- ~ ~id ~ wu fo~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~at'a aZluwt~ her dau~h~r rive u~r of the ~iation for quitht.rj~l~uu~ herd,ughtrr~~d m ~h~ve u ~.nt dual that sht. ~etarded Citizens Ontariu- ~uldn't at~ ChatTaX Cull~e~~Mr might no~ have achieved Pus,no. '1 ~ ~at ~u hu~. ~ by b~l[ la~. ~ ~. o~.= wish U~ere wu mo~ we ~uld ~d ~ ~ she f~ ~1~:(~)~I~17. Nurmela ~w ~ a wh~l- do.' ~t. like ~r ~ingle ~n~ w~ . ~ir end w~ , bru~ usual Center es~llihN by Iiw amy ho~ ~ ~ for ~eir diN- her legs and waist She h~ t~ T~' inland ~nal Cen~r abl~ ~i~n, Uat it's ~ ~ mtu~ty ~d ~ial akill~ of under the m~'o ~man Wl~~ ~t~hblk~iul~- ~verly. the ~r of a 1~ ~, ~id she's am~ at ~velupmenta1 Di~bilitin ~.Omit S~, a G~ey ¢~ ~U~ ~ ~ ~ ~y, ~u who Mke t~ ~ar~ld ~y wi~ ~vem menMI ~e skills Nu~elu has a~ui~ The ~aw hel~ ensu~ ~at ~e insl~tor. ~ps Ch~ly Nu~ela wi~ ~ 0tm~ e~e~. ~ ~ldm. ~Matiun and nuttim who a~ over t~ yea~. disabl~ Nive he~, men~l "1 wet ~m raking ~.~ a ~ ~e Inbnd ~ Cen~r. Nutmain, s young wom~ with m~d eduational ~m~. o~ is t~ng to de~ine how admini0t~tive j~. ~ IM~ ~ ~ Ft~ ~ a ~th,' ~he's an nn~ mother.= long wavy hair and ,pa~ing A 15-mem~r ~ ove~ much it would at ~ 0~ ~ O~e ~ Mminiu~ H~r- Rheas said. =If the Inland'[t'a nut ~ ~ have ~ ~M brown ey~, Mk, Chagey ~l- ~e ~n~0 ~[i~s. ~ ~n~r. pay ~u. in~ ~ in fa~ of ~ ~n~r ~1 ~r ~ ~y ~, ~aiMt yuu." aid ~y, a ~l- 1~ elm d~ign~ for ~ple which ~ u a ~fe~al a~ney, ~iar said he mi~t~ o~- ~ time. ~a wu ~ sly ~ ~M, why ~'t ~ ~n ~e0t. ~b', ~king a I~ wi~ d~ili~. She ~yn employs ~ ~p~, including ~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ut ~ir ur enemit~ o~ ~ ~at ~ ~ ~pb ~d exp~ a ni~ a m~ting wi~ ~e [ni~d ~ewho~n~n~L 230 e~worb~ w~ work with ~e ~s of ~e ~- ch~d~:~ ~lp ~r.= of emoti~ - ~mm ~in ~ Regional Center todigcuss ~e di~ab~ and ~eir faroilia.Rheas'concernsa ut the Mlly d~M~ a~ ve~ b~ ~d ~e ~nter ~ tb SupS- ~ea hu h~ four ~m- nu M happi~ - ~at The center contracts witha~y. de~,' ~ ~mbr ~yd ire hiring ~g p~gram, p~in~ ha~ by ~e m~ O~ gnid Nur~la did n~ ~se L~ ~P hom~, ~u~ion~ M~. ~ ~ond ~r m~ which b w~M ~nM N o~ Administrative HearinCa.a ~ild. facilities and o~er Mni~ apn-Di~tor ~m Ideal eve~ effo~ ~ ~ ~em wi~ ~ eli~bb ~. ~ of ~m were ~n out ~he ~[~'t ~ ~ ~e~ ties to p~v~ s~iali~ Mr- Inland ~nal Cen~r ex~u- ~ir limi~ ~ and sMg." ~m ~, R~ atM~ by an administrative judge;~n~ ~.' ~ sad ~ she c~ with Nubia. d~v~ her ~o~r j~p ~l~ ~ ~r fa~ held on to Nurmela's wa~t ~d vi~e to clienM. C~worke~ ~lptire di~r Verlm W~lley ,a~~Mr firejill UpMI a~ ~ ~n ~gve~ ~ ~- ~ t~ ~main~ ~. wal~ ~ind her in a wa~er at lin, lies ~me up wi~ M individ-he'm up~ ~ ~e ~ap'0 ~ uali~ ~um~ pl~ for t~ir ~a[s. One suction would ~ A~, ~ve di~- rnnm ~ MIk ~ ~ I~la- Administrative Law ~udge an exe~ cl~. ~ bm~ the child~n~d~do~er~m~s. ~ve W~lleyel~m~s~i' ~rof~al~pme~ ~a~t~di~culti~ f~ O~r D.~opf~fu~M albw ~h~r were ~ ~m her T~n~r~ves$50miillon tL~ in,tend o~ni ~ o~- Di~U~ ~, ~ ~ by~mM~iM~n wi~de~l- ~ ~ ~ ~id ~ m~t ~r wa~td~n~sidesoFher~. in onnunl eMte and f~era[ cialn ap~int him M it. a~ ~ema~ ~ ~t op~MI d~]i~. ~r or ~ hi~ ~e ~ ~ ~ of sweat fo~ funding. Con~min~ the pm~l ~ ~y ~ Inl~ ~o~ ~n~r. H~ ~ a~ wo~ wi~ ~ ~iat Nurmela wi~ ~r d~ly ~' n~, Nu~ela g~mac~ ~r ~1~ ~ ~her ~nU pmn~ fur Supraire Living ~ ~m~ for ~ ~ ~ city ~ ~ Cuamo~a ~- iivi~ skii~ and ~n umi~ with ee~ step who al~ ~mplni~ a~u~ the ~i~, W~He ~ina ~t t~t ~ d~M~ ~ ~ a c~ ~ a JB~ dn~n. ~f she compleX. Rheas wi~'d c~nter. ~e for~ ~r otis- pt~u~ can :[~ady ~ paid wa~ ~ ~e ln~MI arm ~ ~ sMa a ~n~, elm r~ ~ wi~ d~bili~ ~m a~ ~1~ ~t Nu~ll'e ~m sweat off ~r own fobhead al~r nizati~ in J~ua~. S~'e nowthm~h the ~ ~poKment ~ ~nMr. su~. At ~N' u~, ~ ~d n~ ~n fo~ ~ a ~r~r ~ ~tu~ Nume[a to her try~dra~l~slati~c~e Hon~Su~ve~e. moving fo~a~ ~ ~ th~ a~i~ I ~t~mfor~p~wi~di~il- 'My daughter is happy.' the ~n~fs ~li~es. 'If t~ s~ we~ ~ o~n t~ th~p ~t ~e ~b ~r ~qh- ~ mun~ chamNs. iti~. Rh~ ha ~n~ ~ ~ aid. ~he', p~ud of '~eR t~ ~o~al ~n~n ~r tto ~o~r p~am). ~ ~r n~,' ~il ~. "Par- Her c~ti~sm of t~ InlMd wo~er forgd Nu~'s ~ she ~ now.= s~t~. i ~ ~l~e they we~ ut would b p~hibi~ve," W~-enM fib Ms. i NIp k~p ~oMI ~n~, h~ewr, ~ ~ a tim s~t citeriM must s~Rheas Mid she plans to s~ed by ~ple who ~ally icy aid. "t don't ~ink (~s)t~ sp~m ~t ~ uk ~ ~v~ ~r n~ enem~ u well ~ ~ veery ~ humor ~ ~u5 a a ~al ~ ~n~r's ~funl worker wu ~ t~ ~. ~ ~ ~r dater ~ enroll in an ~dw~u~e~le has · chance forit ~ing qu~ti~s~" f~. d ~an~ .' MeaNs ~ suppro .~ ~mi ~ ~ ~ ~a Inland Regional Center had~ p~ in with diubili~,,' ~ ~ of ~ V ~fer~ the 21 ~n~n ~d ~e su~. Rh~, said ~ymen~ from b' o~ a~ ~ ~ of ~.' aid chin Nur~ m P/~wiys. Cucamongr that'0 specially 'Now. our ~m~ey is sup~- ~etn. HomeSup~nive~i~ herf~t~wi~Nn~r. W~y, ~ m~fs ~tive ~opf ~in~ out ~at M designed ~or people with i~ this huge ~." a~n't en~h ~d that ~nu hilts White-F~i~n, 37, l~. inv,~ati~ mm ~ ~ ~ -~y~'t~n~j~t ic up shou d be antitedto the aid s~ ~ ~ ~ the ph~e ~ ~st ~ k I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ltd ~n ~d~ by Pa~wap and ~y wsnM ~ ~ it Md her · ,~ p~m. ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t f~ ~ ~ M qm~ p~m found no p~f M suN~ t~rap~t Md su~n ~ve ~- ~ ~ly au~ vies we want? ~, ~ W~[ley s~d m,~ ~nts I M ~ ~r ~.' W~y u~ Rh~' ullegatiou. Nurmela ommn~ it," ~a ~d. 'I've Rht~' idea include su~ ~- a~n't u u~ u i. He twiM f~ NN p~ ~ a *It w~M N ~ a Uability ~r sip ~r nm m~ u ~" ily ~ ~er the yes that i~l m~, u dis~tliq ~e al~ d~n't ~l~e ~y of ~ ~p ~- ~ ~n~r ~ ~t ~t ~g lY Knopf al~ sHN with ~e I j~t have ~ p ~mu~ ~ ~n~r. If s~ ~n't a~mplish su~Ntions ~r c~qe wil] fly'Eve~ ~i~ Nt ~ i m a ~.' ~nter's decision to change~ ~a ~ pt ~ thugs that, she'dl~e~ve~n~r with state legislators and~'m an ~ ~, ~ i~ ~mi~k~I~to ~' ~ ~r ~ fund ~ ~ for pa~nM, o~cmb. shouMn~ N ~ way,' ~ and have ~ memN, e~ ~oni's life ~d nu~as ~ m ~i~Fi~, w~ ~ a ~ by t~e people rather then t~ ~ ~t ~i~ we'~ n~ m~ b ~t~iN ap~m~ by s~ o~ciab. psi ~ f~' W~by ~. for ~U~ ~ ~t haw She w~ ~ ~ ~e sM~ ~ 'Ce~inly, ~ vat ~m~y of child~n wi~ dm~lit,s a~ for their d~l~ ~, jl wi~t ~L' ~ u~. "Bug ~ fel I~ at ~ I m ~ b u i~ would ~y a ~1~ M a ~rk~th~,m~d n~- The group's proposals to ~ ~ ~m~." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ivi~ supra ~ e~c~ ~ ~ ~ wi~ fm~, br f~Uy ~ ~ · WE'VE GOT YOUR have complaints about the ~t w~t ~d ~ ~i- 'W.'m 'q ~ ~ ~r ~ ......... """' "' MATTRESSZ I up support for the group'a~s ~bn ~ ~icin, b and comfo~ of the board- ~mbly S~aer em r~ ~iff, R~at ~, of ~e ~ty of ~na' ~- But ~ Tm ~ ~ ~ Ch~o said ~ o~m su~m ~ p~ ~m ~ ~ ~nt, satisfied wt~ ~he center's ~renU workers, Woollay said. Them~ i~y ~ ~ ~ ~d h~ I~ff ~ itud~g t~ ex~n~ ~ ~n gO ~ w~k The center ~nIFICM with "lf the ~at or ~s~ hu ~m morn. in ~ ~on For ~ ~ · e ~pacity ~ ~e ~ o~ ~t W~lley ~d rant ~mp]ainM ~h~ ~m ~ udity oF ~ ~dividual, ~em's no ~ ~ ~ work~ out ~fo~ ~ey uach home, M-ya~ld ~m] Temple sta~ shoui~'t pay ~em,' ~-an ~minist~ti~ ~s~q. said. "In ~ ~n~s ~, ~e "" .... FREE FREE However. Aguiar said, his complaints ~o before an aid. VioleRce/from A1 m v~ MarklllTaylor March 3, 1997 RECEIVE MAR - 3 1997 GITY OF R/~N(jHO GUG,~iw~j~qu~ CITY CLERK City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Developer' s Response To Appeal on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766 Honorable Members: Mark-Taylor, Inc., is the applicant for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766. The vesting tentative tract map was approved by the Planning Commission on January 8, 1997 and is now before this Council on appeal. The development described by this map is a 264 unit multi-family development (the "Proposed Development"), which represents a $22 million investment by the developer. The merits of the Proposed Development supports the Planning Commission approval and deserves the support of this Council. The Proposed Development, as approved by the Planning Commission, represent 18% more open space than is required by the City and is a very low density community for multi- family use, at 11.9 units per acre. It provides for 57 percent common open space and 58 percent usable open space. Additionally, the Proposed Development is anticipated to contribute approximately $1.2 million in impact fees to local schools and participate in the construction of needed improvements to Baseline Road. The facts submitted to the Planning Commission through staff reports and oral and written testimony, which is now part of the record before this Council, support the Commission's findings and decision, and we are confident will result in the Council 's finding that the Vesting Tentative Tract Map meets or exceeds all applicable development standards. We are also confident the Council's findings will result in a decision that (i) the appeal should be denied, (ii) the map approval should be upheld, and (iii) the Proposed Development should be allowed to proceed. The hearing record clearly supports the findings Mark-Ta,vlor, Inc. 6623 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85250 602/991-9111 · FAX 602/991-9138 City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga March 3, 1997 Page 2 required by the Subdivision Map Act for map and project approval, including: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, and the design of the proposed improvements, are consistent with the City's general plan, development code, and the Victoria Community Plan; the site is physically suitable for the proposed use; the site is suitable for the proposed density; the project design is not likely to cause environmental damage or avoidable injury to fish or wildlife or their habitat; the project design will not cause public health problems; and the design will not conflict with any easement required by the public. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766, as approved by the Planning Commission, was fully supported by the testimony and related material presented to the Planning Commission, and on balance there was no supportable evidence offered to the City to justify a contrary result. The substantial information presented to the City justifying the merits of the Proposed Development and demonstrating compliance with all relevant requirements of State and local law provide a strong mandate for Council to uphold the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15766. Very truly yours, Michael Coghlin Vice President Development TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, decIining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. .WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCIJLATOR were obtained between ] -~' . I996, and ] -_~ , 1996; that I circulated this p~ition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. ,,,,,.,,,,~-,,~ , ~.~ c :~,--f,J,.,,, -5'+ E':~,.,~t~ & I certify that this declaratio .5~'ue and correct. rO TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,MONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. ~ /.~,10,.5 CA7~/...~ti~7.~__-/~_2;z_5__ ,~ z? w 4 ,...z> ,,t- ..... c',~ q/TYt --__,.,-- ........... 9. ~tZ/x,._I /.42.,v.~ ~Lt_%/.~_t_z-_~tidtZ~d~~Z4_ ~-' ,.__2 u.L, ~.~ .. , ~ 71 ~ ,c5,'- / ~., c,..~ ,..t N 2.,......... O, State of California' ) County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR ~. (~&.~d_ ~cL6~ ~'cO ~e_-C", ~o~y ~ ~ the si~t~, were obtained between I-' ~ ,1996, and i - ~ . , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each slgnature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows communi.ty, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR were 6btaine bet,;een ~Li.h.~.a,,i.,~..-, f-J.LS' .199y,, and J eL,net a ,~_,, -5' , 199'~, that I ~irculated tt~ii petition,-~lnd that to the best of my kno4biedge,'each s~ature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify that this declaration is true and correct. ..... TO THE CITY COL'NCIL OF THE CITY OF FL-\NCHO CUCA),IONGA on ~'~ ~ acr::s of l:x:d in the Vicrs:~" D, ...... ~ Community x,~,.'- believe '~ construction of these apa~mcnts will place an untlir burden on our local sclnc. ois (which ~e already overcrowded) ~d t~el that the [sues of traffic congestion, crime. decljnin~ propera/vaiues ~d env[ro~ental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEA~ Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF C~RCULATOR L ~ -_-'~.L //.~ , solemniv swear that the signatures on this petition were ~"iained between '::z'J~,,7 S ~ 1996.-and /~'4' , 1996: that [ circula~:ec4..'.jt,~t;etition and that to the best of my'kn~(vtedg~, each signature is the genuine signature of :he person whose name it purports to be. "' , at correct. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R.-\NCI-tO CUCA.%IONGA ',,Ve. the residents of the Victoria Windrows commur. itZy, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the ',/'ictoria Platreed Communitv. We believe the construction of these apa~ments ,,viii place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) a_nd feel that the issues of traffic congestion. crime, declining property. vaIues and enviroru'nental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name .Address Phone .'.:o. State of Califomia ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ,g"/f~ ,q?,~,- ~/Z/~. / , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition t~ ~a sianamre the , ch is L996: that [ circulaed t~etiti~n ~d that . _ . genuine signature of ~he person whose nae it pu~ons to be. I certify, that this declaration is true and correct. Si_.q, namre of Circulator //~,, '2 Printed Name of Circulatorl"b~o~-~ .-xo- d ~,,~7~?_~ ,--- TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community,, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and t~el that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, f//~.-,-,.~ ./~.Z/2~,{--.--~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained betweei' >') '7~ ~5" .1996, and ~ s' , 1996; that I circulated ~ ~'etition and that to the best of my"~,n'6wledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify. that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulator r_/f~.-rTc,,-' ~,~~d-~--' ' Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community,. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property, values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 3. ,,J u/,f,,,, ~4 6 ,nec~M5'.,C'9-~ ~ t/'6,,,~z ~<~.c. <I ~,~y~ . ~__,'L,__ ........... _9 .Z. l ~ L~' ,,& ~ ._~ = u ~ ~ ~7 ~ ,~, ,~ r, ~ ~ < ~2 q ~ State of Califomia ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. '~"'x ~._ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between cZ"cL~-~ ~,5 ~ ~ q q q . 1996, and <,~ck,x_ "~ x ~, c:[ c~ '7 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Mv address is ~ '~ ¢] q k.35x.C'~.,,-,,.q"--,--O~ (,:j.k. ~ Q'~e_-. ~ q to./,.5 ~7 . I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Printed Name of Circulator TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community,, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community,. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 7. 8. 9. 10. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. /%77-.,~7v ,'-,.y' ~-. '.,.~ ."~:? -,-t 4 .~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between / - ~ ,1996, and /- 4 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is /d s--~, 2_ /--4 -,,---'r~--,--~ --T>flc ,- c/L~'-~ ~ o ~:~ ~, I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulator - --~-~3 ~ Printed Name of C irculator ~ -,- r"x / ~ ~,,-~ 7-:_~ 2--'7 '~"'--" TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property. values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. ~. ~_--ffe,-=_~ ~' 45' 4/'e .~ Jl,- d fl/._qo q - 5' q q - 6. 7. s. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, /t~a~'C,~ ~ · 7c~~'3 solemnly swear that ~e si~a~es on ~s petition were obtained betwee~~ -~ ~ f ~ , ~, ~d ~~ ~/~ ~ 1996; that I circulated this petitign ~d that to the best of my ~owledge, eac~igna~e is the I certify that this ' and correct. Printed Name of Circulator ~~'/'~ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARDf Name Address Phone No. "' F<e, G. 7 z3 7 TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA3,IONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows communi.ty, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition i th , h signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Mv address is 4f. 5"~',i7-- ~t~L~.~,q4~ t_ZT~,..~, , Printed Name of Circulator/~,.~Zfd-[-.-]{:l ~ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. Da n te He Z.3 !,,,,,k-er! ~v2daj~ (~ 7tF,5Z L'C .... OM ~, C-v c a (,a 9 / T. fi_ State of Calitbmia ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I*~~ZJYzZ~ ,Z-/ k~) &t"7~<",solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were o6tained between ~ .~/ ,1996, an _4,//~.~ ~ / ~ q Z , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my kj~f~wledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion. crime, declining property. values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR "t"'7'_~/,.,4Z4't ) ~~'('A~,s°lenmlY swear that the signatures l~n this petition w~rreq/btaiTe~gitx~een',L2et..- d'/ ,1996, and ~ ~ ~ 7 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Mv address is & ~ , Printed Name of Circulator State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR ~/~~-~, solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were,~tainedbetween K]L . ~'/ , 1996, and ,~r,x~,,e / ~'f , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knov~edge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Communib,. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and fbel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime. declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 2. u.),uc,~-, W_t-rx_rl~d_ 2Zqqt C,~ . c~ qo~ ~z . :4. 5. 6. ?. 8. 9. 10. Sta~c of Caii/brnia ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULAFOR I. _ .. ~..,,¢-,-~ 4/~59 ~. solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were ok~ained between . 1996. and 19:)6: that I circulated this petition ~d that to the best of mv knowledge. each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it pu~ons to be. I certify that this declaration is tree ~d co~ect. TO TIlE CII'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Plan. ned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will plac2 an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues o: :raffle congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. / ........ :' ::.: Zf g/,:>d._/2.: ~_y:_ <~- 77vi _ _ State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. -/~/'~'~vj~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obti~ed een / - ~ . 1996, and / - 4 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is / ~, q-~; .,_ &A,~-r.-v,/4 ~_-D~, (~,~c..~x,.~¢%~ , I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows communi.ty, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. I 3. (~ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. "'Y~~/L~ ~_~. , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between (') c.t..,q % , ~, q ~ ~'3 . 1996, and 1 ~ 13 , , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge. each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Myaddressis (4,.~q"7 '\"~sp,-~' ~1, ,~'~.C. C_~ , O_~,cL5~ I certify that this declaration is true and correct,. - Signature of Circulator ~ ~"'{. c._, ,; Printed Name of Circulator YX~'~C)~ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows commtmity, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. ""~'x'~-:.-,,.~L ¢.--,~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition wereobtainea"'betwee6" ' "5%}, %_ , q"7 .1996, and 70.-,-'x 9, t%C~"'k , 1996: that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge. each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. M,. address is ~ (_,', 5 q "1 t~ ,~?,..-¢' V\. I2-. C. G. 5 t'7 S. h I certi~' that this declaration is true and correct. Printed Name of C irculator CO,x> & '~ kJ-xc,_ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEAD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. -~\ C~,A ~,-C)-x. 15. , solemnly swear that the si_,xnatures on this petition werd obtained betl)een ,L~ . 1996, and / "/J' q '7 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify that this declaration is true and correct. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property. values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of Calitbmia ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I~ d~JP_~-a_4r , solenmly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between ~ ~..17/ ,1996, ~d ~~~ ~ / ~, 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to t'he '~est of my ~o dge, easignature is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it pu~ons to be. M~ address is/~ & P _~e e ~ fl C (~ 9 r ~S ? . I certify, that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulatorx~Z}/t-6/ Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, /'2(2zT~d/~' ~_d~d~A_t/v , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between gS~'Carrz/,&u ~??' , 1996, and,~Tt_o..n-d4A) ~.,q/ , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is/~2d&.,o I certify. that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulato~U~~~ Printed Name of Circulator /V,,qA/C V ,C. XA/'e 7-9 ,,9~r"' TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property. values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly. investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of Cali~tbmia ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. erPeo/~i ,,~.J,~_/~-s.,,,--~ , , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition w ned between 'tOt at./w_/-/.4, ,__q/ ,1996, and N-q , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify, that this declaration is true and correct. Si,,nature of CirculatL'~/.,~k Printed Name of Circulator TO Tn~- cff¥ cou~c~.;oF Tiff. Cff,z'0F e,~cno C~C~O~CA~'.- ap~en~ ~11 place ~ ~ b~den on o~ loC~ .school~ (W~ch ~ ~y overcrowded) ~d feel ~t ~e issues of ~c conge~o~ c~e, dec~g p~ v~ ~d en~o~en~ ~p~ have not ~en ~oroug~y ~yes~gat~d. ' ' ~ W~T 0~ VOICES ~~ ~" .. -. ~.. - ._ .. -. .' .. ': .. . N~e " Ad~ess Phone No. State of California ... ) . ' ' )ss ' County of San Bemardino) . 199~ that i circulated ' petition ~7nd'~t'to,hi~-best.of'~xy ~kn~.ledge~'~h Signature is th'e genuine signature of. their'son' whose name '[t:~urports to be. ''"· . ' · ~ ' , TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF .THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows communily,.opp0S.e the .constmcti0n of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in. the victoria PIarmed Community.-'. 'W~belie~'e/.he construction Of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. ' ' WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! · Name Address ' Phone No. State of California ) : : - ) SS County of San Bemardino) - - ~ ~ ' .- DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR 199~; that I circUlaied ~;'petitfon a~ that iO-the best 'of my kno(vledge, each si~ature is the genuine s'ignature of the person whose name it purports to be. ~.,, ,,,,,~,,~., ,. ~ 7 ..¢ ¢'/,.~-/-¢ ,.5,.d~ .,,, c >. ~,59'2',_~_-9 &, , I certify that this declaratioti is tree and corre~:t. Signature of Circulator .... TO THIZ CiTY COUNCIL OF Tt{E CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA.'qONGA \re. the residents of the Victoria \Vindrows communit7, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of [and in the Victoria Platreed Community. We believe the construction of these apartments witl place an unt'air burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and ,~ei :hat the issues of zraLqc congestion, crime, dec!ining propert!,' values and environmental impacts have not been ~horou~hly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEAR.D! Name Address Phone No. 10. S~ate oE CaiiFomia ) ) Ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR ---f . / ' ,' -"" ~.'~ 67 , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition 1996; that [ circulated this n and that to the beS o _ , eac signature is the genuine signature o[ the person whose name it purports to be. M v a d d~ e s s i s // L' ~ / T ~ ~ ~d~'l zk-/~C~ 7,3 [ certify, that this declaration is true and correct. S i gnature o f C ire ul ato r Printed Name of Circulato'r -_j TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community,, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. V, . 8. 9. L._ State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. ~ ~ ,~ %~_w if ,'3'~ T{ ~>, ~ , solemnly swear that the si~a~es on t~s petition were obtained be~een X_~ L/, ~ 7 . ~, ~d /. L/_ c] 7 , ~ that I circulated this petition ~d that to the best of my ~owledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it p~o~s to be. I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulato ' - Printed Name of Circulator ~ks~_ U b\...L \ t~ 'X' r C,_'~ ~ c~ '~ O TO THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' We, the residents. of the .Victoria Windrows comm~..'ty, opp0.se .the c. onstrUcti0n of 264 apartments' on 22.2 acres of land in 'the Victoria Planned Community.~. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! / Name Address /~h ne ( o No. State of California - ) ) ss - County of San Bemardino) -. 'DECLARATION we~'e.~Obtained between 0e~K. 3'~.'/qq~ ,199~,'and ~ 'fiT./'~f~ , 199~; that i circulated ti~ petition arid tlmt tO. ~he'best.of't~y knowledge, e- gsignature is the genuinGrsignature of the person whose name it 'purports to be.5~.~.d)C . I certify that this declaration iS true and corre/;t. Signature of Circulato ' Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ~L,-771/'/ ~/fil~/~tg~_/t~olemnly swear that e signatures on this petition genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. tinted Name of Circula or TO Tt,rE C{TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA.NCHO CUCA.%IONCA We, the residents of the Victoria %Vindro',vs comn,'mnity. oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of iand in the Victoria Plarmed Community. We believe the cons:Fiction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrokvded) a. nd feel that the issues of traffic congestion. crime. declining property vaiues and envLronmentai impacts have net been thoroughly investigated. Vv'E WANT OUR VOICES HEAD! Name Address Phone No I0. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR / [, ,//-tr~.C',d.- Z/'/~p_2 If-- , solemnly swear that the siznatures on this petition oda~d between '" L, '5/~qq ,.zi Z 1996. and ~_-Z-, .9' , were )' h 1996: that [ circulated this ~dti0n and t at to the best of my kn6-wfddge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certi~' that this dec!aration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator//~'~--2q, t -, Z;_/-.'? ,.:,_,.~- Printed Name ot' Circula~or.~'~o TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and tbel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, C'[,r44\,C,~ ~ \ Cc7.,,,'c,._Z_ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between ~ t ' } '[ ~ ,1996, ~d I ' [~ ' ~ 7 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my ~owledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it pu~o~s to be. My address is ~ ) 7 T~,~ ~. 0 ~, , ..... ~f I certify. that this declaration is true and correct. "' Printed Name of Circulator / TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows commtmi~', oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) sS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, F'i"\~r-I,,\t cLSCk. kOZ_Ci.(' ,solemnly swearthat the signatures onthis petition were obtained between / ' 2:~ ' ~ t ' '~ , 1996, and ] ' ~-' ' ~7 7 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. MY address is (~~c~Z' '/Tt~--"it'~.y0'~ ~l) F-k',,qc-t-x-, C~(drncc,~) CA c['[?.~c7 , TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community,, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 1. , ~ /5~,105 CA7tl. L,z>/q}T ( .Z"T/WdA,),D/t.- ca-./1 ~2 L. . 6. ,,Tus/-c Ve:z~-7'~--&(_, ,,?cl' ,,o2:,~z i'rt/ ~Z9 e 9/5,2 7. 77 m / ~-~z~ ~ Z, ~, 2 92 Lo _ZeL _,~L~_ __ ~_q _%7 ~ _3 8. ,.g/ha,,,,,,, [ ~' "' i ' "' "z~, '% LgC'S State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR ' . solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between t - i~ . 1996, and ~ - ~ , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Mv address is I certify that this dec laratio ~/~rue and co ct. ,~- . TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~IONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community,, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. .WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR were obtained between / -~ .1996, and l'-~ , 1996; that [ circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify, that this declaration )~ue and correct. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property. values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. ~>r~n~ 1. L_,,fiu~ b~4 ~T~E }2 33q e~)(E.E.d'_C_t_fiq_ Z79-2~9Z b-.-- ~ 2. c r6~s '7o8'q cr. eraa,v,..m (>I. ....................... 6. u '7oqco c~oc__o,s cT'; _ _ ~: 7_c2:q__b_ c_'~_o_c Z _~ _L77 ........... ~A,qcr--r_.5 COL C_ Z/.d!~'9- -,,zx.,m- Z~"~. /?,.C.- State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR ~at I circulated this p~titi~and thafto (he best of my ~owledge, each signa~e is the genuine signature of the person whose nine it p~o~s to be. I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEAD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR Gx~,_,40t~;/'x 19 '~ ~ ^ , solemnly swear that the sianatures on this petition were obtained between Z~'_g~6[' Z12, E 19~dj~M~ ~C , 19~ that I circulated this ~eti~ion ~d that to the best of my ~owledge, ei~h ~igna~e is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it p~ons to be. My addressis/Z~.~ ~,~~M O~ ~Mt,~ ~~ ~ ~{~3~ I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator ~ ~{)"~q"cq.q_z~_ Printed Name of Circulator ~/9 ]'X'E~ ¢ -,"~t']//l TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property. values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEAD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, O4-qp/,.g. to P T'-e ~ ~' afd-S , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition wereobtairiei:16etCvedn" ..3"l:l.txtadq "P ,199~,,and ...V't~A/t,t/~-~_q 5""" , 199"~, that I circulated this petition Lnd"that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Myaddressis t,,7_.'!.X(' .564')'P'R4".~ t. AM P. j44d?o (7-t. xG~.~'4~rlqta,- D'4, ~173~ I certify, that this declaration is true and correct. Printed Name of Circulator ~_<iJ'.-e?Jqqgt,4 TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I..S,j-~eo/~ h tOr_2te. J~?. ,'T'q~nr~;~,5, solemnly swear that the si~na~es on this petition were Sbt~ined between ] / ~ ~ ~ O . 19~d / / ~ ~ , 199~ that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my ~owledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it pu~o~s to be. I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator // . Printed Name of Circulator TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. . - . _ .,,~,? - ~/~ 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. '~"~F~' ~ ~ 36; ~ c7/¢q "7~c ~9 , solely swe~ that me si~a~es on tMs petition were obtained between .~/a ~ / t / 9 ~ .1996, ~d U ~ ~ ~,/~ ~ , 1996; that [ circulated this petition ud that to the best of my ~owledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose nee it p~o~s to be.' My address is /2-5 ~ ~'~'Ce~~ ~ ) ~~(~ CUe, I ceni~ that this decimation is tree ~d co~ect. 7 / Signature of Circulato~L~~~ Printed Nge of Circulator 7fl ~q TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community,, oppose the consauction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schooIs (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 1. /Y _,~ 7, f ...... 5. <'~, 7-X ,~{~.. m ~:_~-~-~-~ / 5=< x~ ~ Z.~,:z= ~j~ 9'.<' v ~;,1~/s / / 8. 9. 10. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I,///)J[//i2d',t LtS~Q/?r21.2.f) 0 , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between ~'flS? ~ . / 5//- . 199~' and c_g,~',.~., d~//-~2 , 199 ~.nlhat i circulated tgs l~etltion and that to the best of my kno/wledge, each signature is the gen e signature of the person whose name it purports to be. ? I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. , , ,, Signature of Circulatorf Printed Name of Circulator TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, ~ the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., o_p_E9~ the conslruction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of Califomia ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, --X ~ c c [ U h ts)'t_~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on 7~sgpStitio? were obtained between .~U'c- Z-/_'t~ ,1996, and -3 ~10 {~ 199~; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be.. My ~dd~ess is 6 S C~ ~' V~o6 '4~ 0 PC gr, ~~ ~ CA q/7,~' I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circutator ~;~0 ~ Printed Name of Cite -,~ ~t~. Z.o~tdytO TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Z3,NCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ---r~,~., /_,,.d~" , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obt~a~ned betweeh ';Z-a/) ~ , 1996. and Y,-74 s" , 1996; that I circulated tl(~s"p~t~on ind that to the best of my kno-wl'ddge~ each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator X~,,,~. TO THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA3,IONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows communi,t,ty, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Plan. ned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and envLronmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEAPd)! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. [~aq---- ~~5 ~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were oh/ained between ~a,-n .t' . 1996, and ~ ._,e--- , 1996; that I circulated thi ion'ana that to the best of my knowj, e~ge7 each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator d~/~..-r,.-- ~/.Y Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows commtmity, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schooIs (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of Califomia ) County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ,._. ~_.SJ~_/~ , solemnly swear that th signatures on this petition were obtained between ' ~2~r/,_9' ,1996, and ~ ,.~'.. , 1996; that I circulated this petit[tin and that to the best of my kno~/dge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be.. I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulator Printed Name of Circulator//L/~:f/?~'~- ~5~,' '~,,2 TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows cogunity,, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Platreed Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEAD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR , were obt ~gen ' ~ ~ ~ . , 1996; that I circulated ~s 2~d that to ~e best of my ~wled[e, each signa~e is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it p~o~s to be. I ce~i~ that this decl~ation is ~e ~d co~ect. Signa~e of Circulator ..... ~, _ ~ Printed Nine of Circula~Cr~n~ ~ ~ , TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schooIs (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion. crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. : State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. ~z:;r"'~/.,,q~L] ,t~ 6'~~,,~, solemnly swear that the si~maatures on this petition were obtained between .1996, and 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Signature of CirculatorC~~~~--~ PrintedNameofCirculator _tf,,,q/.~'.'U /~ o~"~:',~flff TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, /D~'it~A) fl ~"/~'F____r"/~flA)/ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between .1996, ~d , 1996; that I circulated this petition $d that to the best of mv ~owledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it p~ons to be. I ceni~' that this decl~tion is ~e ~d co~ect. Sianamre of Circulator ~~ Printed NEe or ~7~ ~, d~~nff TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of Califomia ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ,~g/,4,O fl ~'F--Y'~PT,~AZ, solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between / "~/' ? 7 ,1996, and / ' ,q- ~ 7 , 1996; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. ~y ad,:h-ess is /~-4' 0 c/ ~.,4 ,e,~'d',~ 5".27, ,a~,'vc/,',.o C'~',,4..~a,g:C..t .,C.,a I certify that this declaration is true and comet. Signature of Circular ,~~ ~ Printed Name of Circulator ~tr~,/,'q''b) ,/~ 6"'g/n,,aA) ' TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, fifo ~< u~A 4 ~ G ~ I ~ t~ SE ~ , solely swe~ ~at ~e si~a~es on ~s petition t e c si is the ~; ~at I circulated his p tition ~d that to ~e best _ genuine signat~e of ~e person whose nine it p~ons to be. Myad&essis G~JO ~01~ CT, ~ct4O(~( C~ ql~3° I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator_/LF~~ ~ Printed Name ofCirculator fi/0~t~l/Av~ ~/~. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, tiCK v~nA u/ ~ ~ g,~C7/-( , solemnly swear that ~e si~a~es on ~s petition ~; ~at I circulated ~d that to ~e best of my ~owledge, h silage is the genuine signature of the person whose nine it p~ons to be. My address is G ~'O L~U5 C~ ql 37 I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator.~'~ Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. 3 '_~ r__LaZ3--_'_ ~[L-~ E:,_'~ _ _ -{-Z dZz z. l_ Z74_2_c t_ d I ...... _Z 2'2 ~ W- - ,.O_~._0_~.--~a~\3_~'.~ ~'~3_o,<,~, c.L~--~,- o-;o ~ ~ \, r~C,L,, · -~ ., /eo,,, Z,, State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, I,l<x~t~l C-'-~e~th , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between -_21ue~9~-t'~ 5, Iclq"/ , lt~,~d ,.~,.~y ~,/c4q~ , 1~; that I circulated this petition ~d that to the best of my ~owledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose n~e it p~ons to be. My address is L~go ~~ C~. ~~ ~am~, Ch I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of CirculatorJ4'~ ~ Printed Name of Circulator .MO( iAtta~ ~ ~ ,~ Ct,-,, TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues &traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, i~ O :; r, Lit e.- C.-Y ie b lc [q , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between ,---'T~uatV 5 1'~'/7 ,til6, and --T~. 'i ~ {qct'-7 , ~ that I circulated this p~'tition'and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is (,,'750 LO'fuA (Lt' 'bP-~v'tclAO CbtCo..n, tonfiC-4.., CA q173~J , I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Printed Name ofCirculator '~)OSc~lte F~r'ieb~c/~ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. ~~ G~ ~~ ~ri~es%P2 ........... _~~ ..... ~z ~iYJ .............. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I~ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this e 'tion were obtained between ~1"~,,~,-~ 2. / q I~ 7 .1.996, and j'at.~t,~.~,-~ -ft't ~i~7 t,~il6; that [ circulated this petitior[ and [hat to tile best of my knowledge, eatt'~ signature is th'e genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is b ~"'~ flZ~ C/~j[ 51~/7,,j~fl' I certify that this decl 'ar~ Signature of Circulato TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which axe already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California' ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR wer~ jbtaini~l b~ve[h' ~ .~.,i ~-. ~ ,199~, and 5. ~,,~ ~ ~ . 199~ that I circulated ~'petiti~n ~d that to ~e best of my ~owledge,' eacffsi~a~e is the genuine signat~e of the person whose nine it p~ons to be. My address is ~/~ ~ ~ 'p]. . I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Printed Name of Circula . TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community., oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. _~_sc'~_~,~ ~4F_~~2 '7~ ~ c~,,,x~oh~ c:,V~f,9~, /, ~/ 2:~ if: ~ .. }~_ 5ev,' ~1 ~ ~1.~ q- ~~ _ State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I. '~k ~,~.~0_~Le_ ~k,k, -~c~v~.osr , solely swe~ that me si~a~es on ~s petition wer~ ~btained be~ee~ ~.,~,~_ ~ .19~, ~d ~,J ~,~ ~ , 199~ that I circulated ~ii petitio~ ~d ~that to the best of my ~ow~dge, eac~ silage is the genuine signature of the person whose nine it p~o~s to be. I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Printed Name of Circulator TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCLTLATOR I. C ,.~ ~, ~ ~ ,-, ~ ,a ~. c,' tt , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between / ' 9' ' ,199~, and /' f/' ~ 7 , 199~, that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is [Sq~/gcJ~v ~ F)/. ,~75'~4,t4/,~/( k/~f'/,73,¢:~ , I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator (/)~ ~-/U_-~zt- ~ PfintedNameofCirculator C ~-/~/vtt,',,t ~ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. - .... 8. ~ g ~ ~Z ~ ~ g &7Zz_& j z ~'z ~j ,J _~ ............. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, .,...~.~lx, ID~..~,, P,,Cr__ , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between ,JAlq :3, Iqq'l ili]O $ that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledg& each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is 12~43'J I~.RDklBAKlCDR. , Fr_T~IXJD,~ . I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulator ~a,.,J--- ~ Printed Name of Circulator ~DR~ :~..P-.ce.. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestiota crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ,-,,, , , solemnly swear that the sifmatures on this petition were obtained between '~-~/.-,N ~ ,1996. and :~-~-~ ,.5' , 1996; that I circulated this,2417~tiiion and that to the best of my knowi~lge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify that this declaration is tree and correct. Signature of Circulator Printed Name of CirculatJ....2"~,._~-~i:z- TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. qvq' GrorG/nR f'24/.(/9~/r,3tG/A..'7 y-y-coF~nflo fJ ,~/~ /~z~.,,q~- ~ .4/ 8~ ~-' State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR I, ~AI',aD~ ':~tx, p,.G , solemnly swear that the signatures on this petition were obtained between %-3- q7 ~ ~:~o hr-,~ .,'t:~and i-=3 -c'17 ~ 1403 he'3, .-4'99~.~; that I circulated this petition and that to the best of my knowledge, each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. My address is I 2q- Zg 7 I R.OM 1E~x,~K DR, ~ t t-OAMO-A . I certify that this declaration is true and correct. Signature of Circulator ~ ~ "~2:,a_- - _ Printed Name of Circulator SAt, iDeA 'q~ ~,.g__. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We. the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) ss County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR that I circulated tl/,~p'etition and that to the best of~y kn~ledge, eacfi signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. I certify that this declarati and correct. Signature of Circulatory' e ~,~, Printed Name of Circulator "Z,e~'~ 'TO THE CITY COUNCIL.OF THECITY OF RAN(~HO CIjCAMONGA~'.. We, the re'sident~ of the -ViciOria Win .dr0ws'~omm~.'t~ ;'~ep~9.~e ~he.c0~u:6n.'of ~.64 'ap~nent~' on 22.2 acres of land 'm -th.e '~i.ctoria Planne~ Com~unity..~-~V~r.~'~be~ey.e.'.th0co. ll~trU~tion of these apartments will place-an unfair burden on our -lo~l ~choo,lS (which are aiready overcrowded) and feel that the issues of lrdffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly inyestig41~d. ' ' WE WANT OUR yOICES HEARD!: · ..- -. .' :.. ...'..- v .. Name .- Address 'Phone No. & _~_~ -~ ~ ........ : .....~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.' . . ~ ,c ,,~- ,~ ~ ~?~''7"""" ,~~ {o"/-:Scf ~_.~_~,_ ............ State of California- ' ) S$ . ." .: ~- _.... ._ :' ,. '- County of San Bemardino) · - '~.. - .........- ...--"-' '- - · ' '. "'DECLARATION 0F'CIRCULATOR '19; that 'i CirCulated thi~;~tidn ~nd tluit:to il~-best.o~y kna~edge~'~h'si~ is the gen9~e signature Of.~heperso~ whose name'it~urpons to be. ' ' ' "-,.. .' My address is . Printed Name of Circulator /---F~ ~'~ TO THE CITY COUNCILOF THE ~:iTY'OF RAN_C-'HO C~UC,AM. ONGA~'- We, the .~sidents oi; the'.viciO.ria windro.~vs'~omm~.'t~,."0p'.l~.~e.~e.'~~6u. of 264 'apartmentS'-' on 22,2 a~re, s of laUd jn'.the Victoria Planned'Community, ~!~'We.believe=-d~ r, ouStru~tion of apartments'will plm:e an utifair bunt~ on our lo~,~l-schoolS-'(Which at~ hh-eady overcrow~d) and feel that tl~ issues of uaflic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impa~ts have not been thoroughly inyestigat~t, ' ' · WE WANT OUR yOICES.HEARD!: ' -- .-.~ .. .. ...: :.~-.. :. .:- =-- .-- .- .- :~.. .. ... Name " Ad~lr~ss 'Phone No. thai i c~'.u~e.d genme-~~ of~e ~n ~o~ ~e ii"p~m ~ ~. " --- :'. - ~ . . . '7'. .- ~ " ap~cn~ ~11 pl~e ~ ~ b~en on o~ 1~ ~h~ (w~ch ~ ~y ove~mw~d) ~d not ~en ~orou~y ~ye~ga~ .-." · , ~ w~ o~ yo~c~s ~~. ~" · *- .. . .L. . .. , - .- .. Nine Ad~ Phone No. State of California .-. ) ... : -'- : : ss .. . :- -:, .. . County of San Bemardino).- . .... :-!:::- :.:---' -.,:-.-;'.'7-,i",:..'.~;..,i':i.../.!i.!,:::"!'-~.-~' -- .... I certify that this d~laration is true ahd corr~t Signature of Circulator j6z/~,/Y__d~a, TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR werl o~otiined between ~ ,~AJ, t_,~ ff ,199i[, and d~~ ,( , 199~; that I circulated th~ ~eiition $~hi to the best of my ~o~ge, each ~n~re is the genuine signature of the person whose nine it p~ons to be. . , / I certify that this declaration is true and correct. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA We, the residents of the Victoria Windrows community, oppose the construction of 264 apartments on 22.2 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community. We believe the construction of these apartments will place an unfair burden on our local schools (which are already overcrowded) and feel that the issues of traffic congestion, crime, declining property values and environmental impacts have not been thoroughly investigated. WE WANT OUR VOICES HEARD! Name Address Phone No. State of California ) ) SS County of San Bemardino) DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR 199~, that I circulated thifbp;:tition and/i/nat to the best of my kno ledge, each sfdnature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. ,,,,:,, ,,,:,,:,~ ,, ~, 7 f,/¢' fl,~o_~,/o fig,,,,,, ,,, 9 ,q--~,o_,,-,~ -,. Zo, , - --/ I certify that this declaration is true and correct.