The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997/06/18 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 18, 1997 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Jack Larn, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday of the week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALLTO ORDER Alexander , Biane , Curatalo Gutierrez , and Williams . . . B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a High School Recognition Certificate for outstanding citizenship and community services. Presentation of award from CRRA (California Resource Recovery Association) for SHARPS Medical Waste Disposal Program. Presentation of Waste Preservation Tab award by Norcal San Bernardino, Inc. Presentation of Proclamation to the Friends of the Library in appreciation of their efforts on behalf of the Library and their financial contributions totaling more than $100,000. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: May 21, 1997 (Biane absent) June 4, 1997 (Workshop -Gutierrez absent) . Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/28/97 and 6/04/97 and Payroll ending 5/15/97 for the total amount of $2,474,159.62. . Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 1997. . Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale of Beer and Wine for Archibald Market, Angelo Dagostaro, 9032 Archibald Avenue. 13 City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 o o . , . 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Hughes Market, 7243 Haven Avenue. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Castle Liquor and Mini Market, Alberre Abdo and Samaan Nidal, 8655 19th Street. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Vons Companies, Inc., 8778 19th Street. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General for China Alley Restaurant, 8270 Foothill Boulevard. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Liquorland 2, Abraham Media, 9255 Base Line Road, Unit E. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Sizzler Restaurant, Armando M. Rojo, 9588 Base Line. Approval to declare surplus miscellaneous city-owned equipment. Approval of light variance requests for an Alta Loma Little League tournament to be held at Heritage Community Park June 30 - July 10, 1997, and Citrus Little League tournament to be held at Red Hill Community Park July 18 - July 26, 1997. Approval of extension of Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-012AA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval to purchase backup software for PC's on RISC/6000 network in the amount of $45,000, to be funded from 01-4161-3900, Novell file server upgrades in the amount of $35,000 to be funded from 01-4161-3900 and 01-4161-7047. Replacement of Library PC's in the amount of $37,500 to be funded from Data Processing Equipment Replacement Fund (DPERF) for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Approval of Annual Loan Transaction between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Retail Space Lease Agreement between the City, the Redevelopment Agency and Foothill Vineyards Center. 1S 17 19 21 23 2S 27 33 35 36 37 39 4O City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 17. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Community Center Development Fee Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and Foothill Vineyards Center. 18. Approval of temporary Fiscal Year 1997-98 Appropriations and Article XIII B Appropriations Limit. RESOLUTION NO. 97-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 APPROPRIATIONS NECESSARY TO THE DUE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING BUSINESS AND MEETING PAYROLL RESOLUTION NO. 97-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 19. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordedng the annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract No. 14803, located on the northeasterly side of Elm Avenue, east of Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Co., acceptance of offer of dedication a 26-foot wide storm drain easement for drainage and related purposes between Elm Avenue and De Anza Ddve. RESOLUTION NO. 97-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14803, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 97-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 26-FOOT WIDE DEDICATION ON PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 14786 BETWEEN ELM AVENUE AND DE ANZA DRIVE AS OFFERED FOR STORM DRAIN AND RELATED PURPOSES 42 46 48 51 City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 20. 21. RESOLUTION NO. 97-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 FOR TRACT NUMBER 14803 Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for traffic signals located at the intersections of Church Street with Spruce & East Elm Avenues, submitted by Lewis Development Co. RESOLUTION NO. 97-076 a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT CHURCH STREET AND SPRUCE AVENUE AND AT CHURCH STREET AND EAST ELM AVENUE Approval of Improvement Agreement and Security for the Alley Improvement Associated with Conditional Use Permit No. 95-32, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 320 feet east of Archibald Avenue at 9777 Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Foothill Auto Body. RESOLUTION NO. 97-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE ALLEY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-32 56 61) 62 63 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - a request to amend the General Plan to modify the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan, Figure 11-7A, by eliminating the segment of community trail from Youngs Canyon Road across the San Sevaine Basin and modifying all applicable exhibits therein. A Notice of Categorical Exemption has been prepared. APNS 226- 112-02 and 03. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to modify the proposed Wardman Bullock Road/Youngs Canyon Road, between Wilson Avenue and Cherry Avenue, by eliminating the landscaped median and across the San Sevaine Basin by reducing the pavement width and eliminating the equestrian trail and modifying all applicable exhibits therein. A Notice of Categorical Exemption has been prepared. APNS 226- 102-17, 226-111-05 and 06, 226-112-02 and 03,226-311-27, 226- 321-01. ORDINANCE NO. 580 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, TO MODIFY THE PROPOSED WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD/YOUNGS CANYON ROAD, BY ELIMINATING THE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AND REDUCING THE PAVEMENT WIDTH AND ELIMINATING THE EQUESTRIAN TRIAL ACROSS THE SAN SEVAINE BASIN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 97-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97- 0lB, TO MODIFY THE HIKING AND RIDING TRAILS MASTER PLAN, BY ELIMINATING A SEGMENT OF COMMUNITY TRAIL AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 66 74 8O City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 . CONSIDERATION TO ORDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15012. LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOURTH STREET BETWEEN BUFFALO AVENUE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY. APPROVAL OF MAP. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 1 AND 6. SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS INVESTMENT COMPANY RESOLUTION NO. 97-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15012, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 97-080 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15012 RESOLUTION NO. 97-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO +700 FEET SOUTH OF SAN MARINO STREET , CONSIDERATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 97-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN 84 87 88 92 99 114 City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE , , . APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN THE ALTA LOMA CHANNEL DISTRICT NO. 84-2, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 86-2 AND MILLIKEN SOUTH OF ARROW DISTRICT NO. 89-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 97-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REAUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) RESOLUTION NO. 97-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R ('DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 97-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABUSHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) 119 121 122 123 124 131 132 City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 o o APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 ~DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) RESOLUTION NO. 97-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997/1998 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 {DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE RESOLUTION NO. 97-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) 139 140 149 151 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. . , UPDATE ON ISLE HOUSE DISCUSSION OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION DISCUSSION ON DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AREA DISCUSSION OF PARK FACILITIES ITEMS 157 158 162 163 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. City Council Agenda June 18, 1997 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO ADJOURN TO THURSDAY, JUNE 26, 1997, 7:00 P.M., FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CONTINUATION OF ASSESSMENT FOR P.D. 85. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 12, 1997, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 21, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetin(3 A. CALLTO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 21, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and Chairman William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Wait Stickney, Associate Engineer; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Department; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was: Councilmember Paul Biane B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the month of May as Bicycle Month. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation. The recipient, Steave Savage, was not present to receive it. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing a second edition of the Rancho Cucamonga Kiwanis Club Belt Buckle as a commemorative symbol of the City's 20th Anniversary. Mayor Alexander presented the proclamation to Bruce Robinson of the Rancho Cucamonga Kiwanis Club and Dave Kiedrowski, Chairperson for the Kiwanis Club Belt Buckle project. The official "Belt Buckle Plaque" was presented to Mayor Alexander. It was also mentioned that the belt buckles are available from any Kiwanis member or at Base Line Hardware. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing "Stand for Children's Day." Mayor Alexander read a proclamation for "Stand for Children's Day' which would be mailed to that organization. B4. Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, presented award to the Council for National Make a Difference Day. City Council Minutes May 21, 1991 Page 2 Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, presented an award to the City Council for "National Make A Difference Day" for their waste prevention efforts. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Jim Frost, Director of the Etiwanda Historical Society, introduced the Boardmembers for the Society. He talked about the Isle House and stated that it would be demolished if something is not done soon to move it before the freeway goes in. He stated they would like the Council to discuss this at their June 4 meeting and would like information back from staff addressing the options for the house. Mayor Alexander asked that this come back on the next meeting agenda for further discussion. C2. Charlotte Ferrari of Alta Loma talked about a piece of property she owns in "Old Town Alta Loma." She stated she would like to do something with this property besides sell it and would like to develop it so that it attracts people into this part of town. She stated she was hoping that she could be allowed to have an open air produce market so that vendors would come in and sell their goods for the weekend. Mayor Alexander stated he felt she should start talking with staff first. Ms. Carrad stated she already'has. Mayor Alexander stated this could be brought up at the June 4 meeting so the Council could discuss it. Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez asked for her to submit something in writing or put together a package for the Council to see so they will get a better idea of what she is wanting to do. Councilmember Curatalo stated he certainly would like to explore this. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: March 19, 1997 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/23/97, 4~30~97 and 5/7/97; and Payroll ending 4/17/97 for the total amount of $2,916,611.48. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 1997. D4. Approval of amended Fiscal Year 1996/97 appropriations. D5. Approval to appropriate $3,500 awarded by the California Department of Education into Ubrary Accounts. D6. Approval to appropriate $13,646 awarded by the California State Library into Library Accounts. D7. Approval to appropriate $5,000 awarded by the California State Library into Library Accounts. D8. Approval of a resolution adopting the second edition of the Rancho Cucamonga Kiwanis Club Belt Buckle as a commemorative symbol of the City's 20th Anniversary. City Council Minutes May 21, 1997 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE SECOND EDITION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA KIWANIS CLUB BELT BUCKLE AS A COMMEMORATIVE SYMBOL HONORING THE 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D9. Approval of a resolution of intention to vacate Charles Smith Avenue from Fourth Street to +700 feet south of San Marino Street and setting the date of the public hearing for June 18, 1997 (APN: 229-263-15 through 21 and 229-321-01). RESOLUTION NO. 97-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO +700 FEET SOUTH OF SAN MARINO STREET D10. Approval of the map and ordedng the annexalJon to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 14691 located at the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Aspen Street (APN: 208-352-80), submitted by Rancon Realty Fund III, a California Umited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 97-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 14691 RESOLUTION NO. 97-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 14691 D11. Approval of maps, improvements agreements, improvement securities, ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract Nos. 14534-1 and 14534-2, located at the southeast comer of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California Corporation, and summary vacation of a 20-foot wide storm drain easement as shown on Parcel 1 of Tract No. 13279 RESOLUTION NO. 97-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBERS 14534-1 AND 14534-2, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 97-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 FOR TRACT NOS. 14534-1 AND 14534-2 City Council Minutes May 21, 1991 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 97-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON PARCEL 1 OF TRACT NO. 13279 D12. Approval to renew the Contract for Household Hazardous Waste Services (CO 97-022) rendered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the San Bernardino County Fire Department Household Hazardous Waste Program. D13. Approval of a Professional Sewices Agreement (CO 97-024) with Ridens and Associates for Real Estate Brokerage services to assist staff in disposal of Grove Avenue Yard Facilities. D14. Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond. No. 229987S in the amount of $25,000.00 for Tract 14192, located south of Nineteenth Street, between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Biane absent). E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 - SHEFFIELD HOMES - Consideration of a request to reduce the minimum and minimum-average front yard building setback requirements in City adopted Development Agreement 89-03, for a previously approved County subdivision annexed into the City (Tract 13835), which consists of 78 lots on approximately 20 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN: 225-501- 01 through 78. Staff report presented by Steve Hayes, Associate Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed with the Planning Commission on this matter. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the ~!e of Ordinance No. 579 (number changed from 574, which was shown on agenda). ORDINANCE NO. 579 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 89-03, FOR A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM AND MINIMUM-AVERAGE FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN CITY ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03, FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COUNTY SUBDIVISION ANNEXED INTO THE CITY (TRACT 13835), WHICH CONSISTS OF 78 LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES City Council Minutes May 21, 1997 Page 5 OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-501-01 THROUGH 78 MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 579 for June 4, 1997. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Biane absent). F2. Consideration to approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution for the levy of annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1997/98. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 97-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 See discussion under F3. For this item. F3. Consideration to approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution for the levy of annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for Fiscal Year 1997/98. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. Staff report presented by Wait Stickney, Associate Engineer. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt it was wonderful that the City has gone several years without increasing the rates. Councilmember Williams asked if the water sensor devices were in any of these areas. Wait Stickney, Associate Engineer, stated they had already started retrofitting the districts. Councilmember Williams asked what was left to do. Wait Sl~ckney, Assodate Engineer, stated LMD 1, but that they are almost done with the entire retrofit process. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 97-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution Nos. 97-064 & 97-065. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Biane absent). City Council Minutes May 21, 1991 Page 6 No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REGARDING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY HALL PARKING Staff report presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II. Jack Lam, City Manager, added that as the courthouse activity has expanded, the parking problem has gotten worse. He stated the County has advised the City they will be adding parking spaces to their facility, and by doing this there would be adequate parking at City Hall to serve its customers, which should come first. Councilmember Curatalo asked if this has been discussed with the Police Department, and felt the Police could handle this like other commercial areas. Jack Lain, City Manager, explained that someone is needed to be at the parking lot from eight to ten hours per day and that it was felt it would restrict a Citizen's Patrol Officer from doing other things if they are stuck at the parking lot all day. He stated that is why they would like to contract this service out. He stated the spaces will be marked one to two-hour parking. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was still concerned that County customers can park in the City lot for one to two hours and get away with it. He stated he felt the City should use tow companies from our City for the towing of the cars. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the towing part of this would be very infrequent and that the County is aware of this proposed ordinance. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, the public comments were closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 578. ORDINANCE NO. 578 (first reading) AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE PARKING PLAN APPLICABLE TO CITY HALL PARKING LOTS MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 578 for June 4, 1997 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Biane absent). No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS City Council Minutes May 21, 1997 Page 7 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J 1. Brad Buller, City Planner, asked if Ms. Carmri's item could wait for four weeks if she needed more time to get the information together. The Council concurred. J2. Mayor Alexander stated he and Councilmember Williams talked about there being more concerts or other events at the stadium to make some money for youth activities. He stated he would like a report to come back to the Council at the next meeting. J3. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to look at the tow buck situation and the idea of using Rancho Cucamonga businesses only in Rancho Cucamonga. He pointed out that Councilmember Gutierrez had brought this up in the past and felt it should be talked about again. Councilmember Williams asked about auto-related prospects coming into town that might have tow services. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated to his knowledge there are none, but that he would look into this. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Pat Rainsway asked about Sapphire Canyon and the rock quarry that was going in there. Mayor Alexander stated this is the County area. Councilmember Williams asked that he go to the County Board of Supervisor's meeting and bring this up, and pointed out the City also was very concerned about this. K2. Michael Bailey asked when the utility tax will be eliminated or reduced. Mayor Alexander stated it has been reduced by 10% and will be reduced again. Jack Lam, City Manager, commented on the reduction formula and how this takes place. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4-O-1 (Biane absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: Z 0 ~.)~ I cx ,h v v V v v V v v v v V v z.~ I-- Y ~ O~ o 1.4 v~ ~ ~ V V vz Z ~ V v u ~ z '"Z' ~ 'J ~ ~~ t.:.l '..) ~ ~' ::) Z "D ./) "'~,-'~ ::D qg ~ Oz ~JJ LJ dC I..- ,,J ).- (.L I--.~ U ,.J 'U MI '..) c~' ~,) '"'T '~ "'Z:J*.J ~ (.[ .U · · · · · · · · · · · · e · · · · · eleleeeeeeeleeeeeeleeeeeeee Ii I ! ! · II I ! ! I I I I I I· It IlI III kq J~/) 0 u ~:.J · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · A '0 · ii · ! ! ! ! · · ! ! I )- ! · · · ! ! · · I · 0 ! · · I · · · I · I I I · ! I · · Z I &. · r · I ! I · · · · i · · £ · · · · · · · · · · J C3M~. C3 I ! · t I · I I q · · ! d ! · I i(l · · ! · · I(I · · · ~ , · ! · · · · l IZI · · I~1 I(I III · · · · · · · · · I · · I · · t · I · ! · I I I · · · · · I- IZi la. I i..el I~ I · · i I · ! · · · I · · · · I I · · I · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 L ! i. · · ~Z ,uZZ)w,u~ZZZ~ (.,)Z uJ Z&. .I Zt, M z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~* wE c~ eO ~ C3 Z ~J uJ .d O~J 3: · m & m · · J _o ___o _o _o _o __· __o J J J J _O __0 · · ~ :~c) z~.~ 1 · · ! b · · · · · · ! · · · · · · · · ! · · · ! · ! · Z 0 ZZ~M~OOZO~ ZkZ~W Z~Z~ Z 0 I'~ ..J ~Z ~0 eW 06/10/1997 CITY OF RAMCHO CUCAMONGA PORTFOLIO MASTER SUi~LqRY MAY 31, 1997 PM- 1 CITY CASH AVERAGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365 INVESTMENTS BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERM MATUIilTY EQOIVALERT gQOIVALENT Certificates of Deposit - Bank $ .eeeeeeeeeeeee. Local Aqency Investment Funds ................ Federal Aoency Issues- Coupon ............... $ ~reasury Securities - Coupon .................$ Nortgage Backed Seomities ................... 8,825,532.20 12.39 390 239 5.941 6.023 15,043,782.02 21.12 i 1 5.535 5.612 46,397,812.50 65.13 1,626 1,244 6.497 6.587 272,845.00 0.38 1,180 91 6.057 6.141 701,810.26 0.99 8,339 4,431 7.768 7.875 TOTAL IFv'ESTMERTS and AVERAGES .............$ 71,241,781.98100.00% 1,194 884 6.236% 6.322% Passbook/Checkin(j Accounts ...................$ 1,389,592.50 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield calculations) A~ Interest at l~mchase ................. $ 18,497.~ I~YrAL C~H ~ P~rR(II~,SE IRT[2~.~T .............$ 1,408,~.40 TOTAL CASH aild IMVESTME~$ .................$ 72,649,872.38 MOWT!{ E}FI)IN{2 FISCAL TOTAL EARM~ MAY 31 ~ ~ DATE C~lrrent Year $ 373,581.5~ $ 3,766,165.47 AVERAGE DAILY BALANCE EFFECTIVE RATE OF RETURN $ 72,136,637.68 $ 65,348,775.57 6.10% 6.28% DATE I certify that rids report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted August 7, 1996. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Pro,ram herein shown provide~ sufficient cash flow liquidity to 'meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Source of Valuation - Interactive Data Co~9~ratlon a~omatic.pric~ service. O6/lO/1997 CII'Y OlP ~ ~ I~Y ]1, 1~? PM- 2 CItY 1,500,000.00 1,54)0,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,005,005.00 1,04)0,000.00 1,810,532.20 1,810,532.20 3,000,050.05 3,000,000.00 8,825,532.20 8,825,532.20 1,500,000.00 6.0(X) 6.000 6.083 05/26/98 359 1,515,000.00 5.650 5.650 5.728 08/06/97 66 1,(~)0,0(0).~ 5.830 5.830 5.911 03/05/98 2?*7 1,810,532.20 5.700 5.700 5.779 09/16/97 107 3,000,000.00 6.240 6.240 6.327 04/29/98 332 8,825,532.20 5.941 6.023 239 lYERIGgS 14,685,717.50 13,834,131.33 13,834,131.33 1,209,650.69 1,209,650.69 15,043,782.02 15,043,782.02 13,834,131.33 5.612 5.535 5.612 1,209,650.69 5.612 5.535 5.612 15,043,782;02 5.535 5.612 1 OO964 00969 00973 OO978 0O983 00988 00~3 O0922 04)94O OO962 00971 00974 O0982 0O989 O0991 01/16/96 o3/05/9~ 05/20/9~ lO/O3/98 12/z3/9~ 03/27/97 04/29/97 12/19/94 041o6195 12/18/~ 03/19/96 05/21/96 12/30/96 04/02/97 04/29/97 0093~ OO957 OO967 0O968 00972 00947 00959 0O96O 00981 OO984 O0992 I'1tDg!IU, ~ ~ IIIM. ~ O41O6195 ffi)DIL !iffi bin HCI~. CO 11/2019S [~gRJl, lille RWI IDa. CO 0:3/06/96 ffi)~U, IIONI ~ K)E'M. ~ 02/22/H SI~I~ALS aJ~cI AVERAGES 05/08/95 11/29/95 11/24/95 11/29/96 12/12/96 05/05/97 46,139,747.98 1,~)3,1~.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.05 1,0(~),005.05 942,968.~5 1,OCO,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 995,312.50 1,0(0),0(0).00 1,(X~0,000.05 1,O(X),000.00 1,04)0,(X)0.05 1,OCO,(X)O.~ 2,005,(XX).00 1,(~)0,312.50 1,000,(X)O.00 1,~2,031.~ 2,500,0(X).~ 2,500,0C0.00 1,~8,750.05 1,98S,312.50 1,.F~)O,O(O).~ I,.F~)O,(X)O.00 4,C~)O,(X)O.~ 4,0C0,000.00 1,(X)O,O(O).~ 1,O(~),(X)O.00 2,000,000.~ 2,000,(~)0.00 1,980,000.00 2,0(0),0(0).00 2,0(0),(~)0.00 46,397,812.~ 46,500,000.00 1,g~0,625.00 6.030 6.030 6.114 1,~65,000.00 6.165 6.165 6.2.51 1,001,250.00 6.500 6.500 6.590 1,499,531.25 6.610 6.610 6.702 990,625.00 6.700 6.700 6.793 1,988,125.00 6.620 6.620 6.712 1,996,875.00 6.310 6.499 6.590 1,012,500.00 8.030 8.030 8.142 987,500.00 5.240 7.030 7.127 3,938,750.00 6.195 6.195 6.281 993,125.00 5.880 6.053 6.137 1,002,500.00 7.025 7.025 7.123 990,000.00 6.195 6.195 6.281 1,988,750.00 6.540 6.540 6.631 1,002,812.50 6.518 6.500 6.590 1,001,875.05 7.420 7.226 7.326 2,469,531.25 6.290 6.290 6.377 1,955,625.00 5.990 6.005 6.088 1,939,375.00 5.695 5.867 5.948 3,000,000.00 7.275 7.275 7.376 1,514,062.50 7.270 7.270 7.371 3,947,500.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 997,187.50 5.970 5.970 6.053 1,958,750.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 1,957,500.00 6.160 6.378 6.467 2,020,000.00 7.070 7.070 7.168 46,079,375.00 6.497 6.587 01/16/01 1,3~c 03/05/01 1,~ 05/20/9~ 7~. lo/o6/99 8s7 12/24/01 1,6~7 03/27/02 1,760 04/01/~ 669 12/19/97 20~ ~/30/98 5~7 12/18/oo 1,~ 03/19/99 656 05/21/Ol 1,450 06/30/00 1,125 04/02/01 1,401 o4/m./~ 689 09/23/99 844 11/17/00 1,265 03/06/01 1,374 02/16/01 1,356 05/15/01 1,444 05/08/00 1,072 11/28/00 1,276 11/25/98 542 11/29/01 1,642 12/14/01 1,657 o5/08/o2 1,~o2 1,244 06/10/1997 ¢I~f O~ 1~ O]CLMO~,~ ~ ' ] I~MTM~ I~LIO D~TAIL& ' 1-~ ¢I1~ MAY 31, 1997 C. ASi{ InVEST!qDIY AVERAGE I:'URCI{~%.~E STATED ---YTM-.-. MAI'URITY DAYS NUMBER IS,.~UER BALAWCE DAYE BOOK VAU2E FACE V~ !{2~l{l{:g? V~L~! R~YE 360 365 DATE TO MA? TREASURY SECURITIES - COOPO~ 009O3 TREA.~URY NOTE 06/08/94 272,845.00 277,000.00 277,173.13 5.625 6.057 6.141 08/31/97 91 272,845.00 140R'fC,~G! BACI{[E!) S~CURITI~ 00071 I~I)~ALHO~ LOUIMORTG. C002/23/87 00203 FIR)ERAL MAYL lifo ASSII 09/21/87 00002 ~ MA?IO!OJ, ~ A 06/23/86 0(X)69 ~ MA?IOMAt, WOR'I'~ A 05/23/86 00004 ..~OT.L BOSINESS AI)M1] 07/25/86 SUBYOY~t~ and AVERAGES 708,198.62 39,900.85 40,964.09 32,034.52 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 1,675 81,655.57 88,395.75 87,361.62 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 4,840 70,671.93 71,657.22 58,391.70 8.500 8.621 8.740 05/15/01 1,444 23,029.27 22,577.72 2,828.38 9.000 8.534 8.652 03/15/01 1,383 486,552.64 441,693.18 4~,08~.18 8.750 7.261 7.361 07/25/11 5,167 701,810.26 660,704.40 665,287.96 7.768 7.875 4,431 $ 71,241,781.98 70,886,544.75 71,115,912.28 71,311,602.18 6.236% 6.322% 884 06/10/1997 CId/OF PAIlCliO ~ PN ' 4 I~ 31, 1997 ~ CHIOmlO/$AVIWGS 00180 BANK Or AMERIC~ 1,359,330.87 2.000 1.973 2.000 00979 BANK Or AMERI~ 0.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 00985 BANK 01~ AJiI!{ICI 30,261.63 2.000 1.973 2.000 SUBTOtALS a~d AVEIIAG!~ 1,020,725.40 1,389,592.50 1.973 2.000 Accrued Interest at Purchase 18,497.90 T{:)TAL C.A..ql{ ~ INVES~ $ 72,136,637.68 72,649,872.38 // 06/10/1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PORTFOLIO MAST~ IIIVESTMDff ACTIVITY BY TYPE MAY !, 1997 - MAY 31, 1997 PW- 5 CITY CASH STATED TRANSACTlOll PO]{CHASE~ SALES/14ATURI?IES TYPE ~TME)IY ~ ISSOE]{ RATE DAY]: OR DEPOSITS OR WIYHI)RAW~ BALAWCE CER'HFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BAlK BEGI)D{lllG BALUIC'E: 00945 SAN{iA 6.410 05/02/1997 2,000,000.00 00980 SAMWA 5.350 05/27/1997 51)0,000.00 11,325,532.20 0.00 2,500,000.00 8,825,532.20 LOCA~ AGEIIC'Y INVESTMEIR FUNDS (Monthly Summary) OOOO5 LOCAL AGEWC'Y IJIVS~ FUND O0804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FU]11) 5.612 5.612 BEGIN]lING BALANCE: 1,600,000.00 15,643,782.02 15,043,782.02 ~I~/SlVINGS ACCOOM~S (MOnU:ly summary) OO1BO BAWK OF AMERICA 00979 BA}O[ OF AM~.[CA 00985 BANK OF AMIH{ICA 2.000 2.000 2.000 3,468,000.00 5,270.33 3,473,270.33 BEGIIIIIIIGBAIJdIC'~: 2,323,800.00 2,323,800.00 240,122.17 1,389,592.50 FEDE]~LL AGEIICY ISSUES - COUPO!{ OO992 FEDERAL RA~ M'I'G ~ BEGINIllIN2 BALAMCE: 7.070 05/0S/1997 2,000,00(}.00 44,397,812.50 46,397,812.50 TREASURY SECO]ilTIES - C~ 272,845.00 272,845.00 }401rI'GAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL HON~ LOUI MOlteN2. CO~. 8.000 00203 FEDEIiU~ li~ ~ ~ 8.50{) 00002 GOV'ENI~WY ~?IO~U~ ~ ASS~ 8.500 00069 GO~ ~TIO~ ~ A,~ 9.000 05/15/97 1,147.42 ~/27/97 6,429.62 05/12/97 1,322.~ o~/o4/97 50.~ 710,761.03 SUB'I'O~ALS and ENDIMG ~ 0.00 8,950.77 701,810.26 BEGIIOII}I(; B~J2~lC{:$ 72,590,854.92 6,473,270.33 6,432,750.77 72,631,374.48 DROPPING YES .... APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-z~00 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: File Number .............. 331377 Receipt Number ......... 1137688 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 5-14-97 Issued Dam RIVERSIDE ARCHIBALD MARKET 9032 ARCHIBALD AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 HAMID NIGHAT 311240 PARTNER NO ' ~4,.~~ RECEIVED City o_f Rancho ,-,.._ License Type Transaction Type Fee Tv~e Master DuD Date Fee 1. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 MAY 14,1997 $50.00 : 2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND ANNUAL FEE NA YES O MAY 14,1997 $34.00 : 3. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 2 MAY 14,1997 $78.00 : TOTAL $16 2.0 0 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? Act. or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Expla,n any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of sAN BERNARDINO Date MAY 14,1997 Under penalty of perjury. each person whose signature appears below, cemfies and says: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corporauom named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant ~ applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to he conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into nmte than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditre' or tramfetor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicanl or the licensec with no resulting liability to the Department ApplicantName(s) '~' (~i /' ~.~? ApplicantSignature(s) DAGOSTARO ANGELO '//~~~~,~'' t~' i /'~i/i,'-~,' ",. / attached ABC-231 227 to follow: Utica Escrow Corp. 10681 Foothill Blvd., Ste. 301 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Escrow: 9063-SN va ABC 211 /3 DROPPING APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE{S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number .............. 199123 Receipt Number ......... 1136541 Geographical Code ....... ~ 3615 Copies Mailed Date Issued Date 5-13-97 'PARTNER NOX DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Bus~ness: Number and street City. State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from prermse address) If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: HUGHES MARKET 7243 Haven Ave Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Yes 14005 LIVE OAK AVE IRWINDALE CA 91706 21 HUGHES MARKETS INC 91730 L~cense T/De Transaction ~wDe Fee ~¢De Mascer DuD Date Fee [, 2! OFF-SALE GENEFLa. L RENEWAL FEE NA YES 0 MAY 07,1997 5376.00 2, 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL STOCK OWNERSHIP NA '{ES 0 MAY 07,1997 5824.00 3. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL MULTIPLE STOCK T.RA2qSFE NA ~I 57 ~Y 07,1997 37068.00 4 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL STATE FINGER?RINTS :,JA ~: 6 MAY 07,1997 3234.00 TOTAL 58502. O0 Have you ever been NO Have you ever v~olated any provisions of ihe Alcoholic Beverage Control conv,cted of a felony': Act. or regulauons of the Department perta,n,ng to the Act? P-12 Explain any 'Yes' answer to the above questions on all attachment which shall ~ de.~med pall of this applicauon. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on.sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensec. and (b) that he w~11 not v,olate or cause or permit to ~ violated any of the prov,sions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIY'ORNIA County of LOS ANGELES Date MAY 07,1997 Under penalty of perlury. each I~rSoa whose signature appean below. cemfies and says: 11 ) He ,s an apphcanc or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applecam corporat, on. named in the foreloinS application. duly authorized to make this application on ,Is I~ehalf: (21 that he has read the forego, ng and knows me comenc,~ mereof and that each of the ala~ve statements therein made ate true: (3) ~hat no per,on other man the applicanl or applicants has any direct or tachfeet interest m :he apphcam or applicant's business to be conducted undor the licenseis) for which d'us application ~s made: (41 thai the transfer applicauon or proposed transfer ~ not made to ,~at,sfy the payment of a Ioaa or to fulfill an alreemem entered ,too more than n,nety {901 days precedin8 the day on wh,ch the transfer appl,cauon is filled w~ the Department os' to gmn or establish a preference to or for any creditor or Iransfcror or ~o defraud or injure any crediior of rtan.,~feror: (5) that me transfer applicauon may be w.hdrawn by e.her ~he applicanl or the licerace w~th no resulung I,abHity ~o the Oepammem. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) HUGHES MARKETS INC SEE ATTACHED ABC-211-SIG · \I'TAC'HI~I) RECORDED NOTICE /5 j ¢4 £ I fO IIVI A DROPPING YES APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number .............. 330633 Receipt Number ......... 1134263 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date.. 4/23/97 Issued Date PARTNER DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premise address) RIVERSIDE CASTLE LIQUOR AND MINI MARKET 8655 19TH ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 If premise licensed: _ a¢q, BO C"BOO'IIlOOgil Ty~ of license C~t~ p~tu~ -- Tmnsferor's nme~icense: ATRASH QADRIEH A 321271 Lzcense ~e Transaction ~Do Fee ~ue Master DuD DaCe Fee 1. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 APR 23,1997 $1274.00 : 2. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 23,1997 $446.00 : 3. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PREMISE TO PREMISE TRA NA YES 0 APR 23,1997 $100.00 : TOTAL $1820.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? YES Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County Of RivERsiDE Date APR 23,1997 Under penalty of perjury. each person whose signature appears below. certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporauon, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to mnke this applicauon on ,ts behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the content~ thereof and that each of the above statements therein made am true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the mmsfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agr~nnent entered into more than ninety (90) days pmcedin8 the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or. fo~ any ca'~dito~ or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of u'ansferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licens~ with no resulting liability to the Degamnent. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) ALBERRE ABDO M~/~~' SAMAAN NIDAL Attached:231 & 227 & Copy of Power of Attorney: Orig in Sacto ABC 211 (5/96) [7 Il Il C,~ L ! fO ENIA DROPPING FIPPLICRTiON FOR flLCOlIOL BEUERflGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premise address) If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: File Number .............. 018408 Receipt Number ......... 1135157 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date. . Issued Date PARTNER License TYPe 1. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL 2. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL 3. 47 OFF-SALE G~4E?~L 4. 21 OVERPAYMENT Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 8778 19th St Rancho Cucamonga, CA SAN BERNARDINO YES 91701 618 MICHILLINDA AVE ARCADIA CA 91007 DuD ~)ate Fee PERM 2I. VON~_~_.COMPANIES INC THE Transaction Type Fee Tv~e Master STOCK OWNERSHIP NA YES 0 MULTIPLE STOCK TRANSFE NA N 310 MULTIPLE STOCK TRA2~SFE M N' 1 APR 29,1997 APR 29,1997 APR 29,1997 TOTAL Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? P- 12 $824.00 : $38440.00 : $1OO.O0 : 24.00 $39388.00 Explain any "Yes' answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall b~ d~rned part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, anci (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of LOS ANGELES Date APR 29,1997 Under penalty of perjury. each penon whos~ signature appears below. ce~fi~ and ~ys: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an cxecuUve officer of applicant corporauon. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that be has read the foregoing and knows the contents meteor and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) tl~ no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer applicanon or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to. fulfill an agreement entered into ~ than ninety (9~,) d~.ys prect~n$,.the day on .which ,?,e transfer appiicauon is filled with the Department or to gain or establish · prelerence to or for any cmdito~ or transferre' or to delrrau~ ot injure any crealto~ o! tran$1eror. t~! that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicam ot the licerisen with no resulting liability to the Del~'lJv~.nt. Applicant Name(s) , Applicant Signature(s) VONS COMPANIES INC THE SEE ATTACHED 211-SlG RECORDED NOTICE TO FOLLOW. ABC 211 (5/96 ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ o a ~ ~ ~ DROPPING APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 9250 l (909) 782-4400 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premise address) If premise licensed: Type of license Transferoff s names/license: File Number .............. 330459 Receipt Number ......... 1133451 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 4-17-97 Issued Date RIVERSID~ CHINA ALLEY RESTAURANT 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 2021 SHOREWOOD AVE UPLAND CA 91786 WANG HYUN H 329481 PARTNER NO~ License TVDe Transaction Type (SELF-INC) 1. 47 ON-SALE GENERAL EA REDUCED FEE TRANSFER Fee TxrDe Master DuD Date Fee NA YES 0 APR 17,1997 $50.00 : TOTAL $ 50.00 _ Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Explain any "Yes' answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensec, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date APR 17,1997 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (i) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corporauon, named in the foregoinS application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above stataments therein made are true: (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or lndir~:t interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be ¢onduct~l under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days precedin[ the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preferenc~ to or for any creditor or Iznesferor or to defraud or injure any ca'editor of transferre'; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licens~ with no resultin8 liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) ..,/' CHINA ALLEY INC '/~:L.--/ J By: I~Iyt~rt~. ~ang/t're~. AtmchedABC-231&ABC-227 va ABC 21 I (5/96} c n t t t o ~ ~ ~ ~ DROPPING ~ _ ~_~,--i--.--- - YES 8PPLI RTION FOR L OHOL BEDER 6E LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Conu'ol 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 File Number .............. 330681 Receipt Number ......... 1134491 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 4-24-97 Issued Date DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? If premise licensed: Type of license RIVgRSIDE LIQUORLAND 2 9255 BASELINE RD UNIT E RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA SAN BERNARDINO YES 91730 Transferor's names/license: MEIDA ABRAHAM 256677 License TVDe Transaction Type Fee TYPe Master DuD Date Fee 1. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 APR 24,1997 $1274.00 : 2. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 24,1997 $446.00 : 3. 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 2 APR 24,1997 $78.00 : TOTAL 51798.00 Have you ever been /]/~" Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? .~..2 Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Explain any "Yes" answer to~/~e above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a !icensec, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date APR 24,1997 Under penalty of perjury. each person whose signature appears below, ecruflea and ~ys: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant cotpotation. named in the foregoin8 application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an asreement entered into more than ninety (90) days precedin8 the day on which the transfer appLicauon is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor;, (5) that the transfer applicauon may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensec with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) /Aoplicant Signature(~) /' ABRAHAM MEIDA INC fS~~]? ~lT~F'_/:~ By: A' - ' braham Meida/Pres. Attached ABC-231 & ABC-227 va ABC 211 (5/96) 0 J ¢n t t t o ~ N t A DROPPING APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department ot' Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main St.. Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782-4400 File Number .............. 332000 Receipt Number ......... 1140480 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 6-3-97 Issued Date DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License TvPe RIVERSIDE SIZZLER . 9588 BASELINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 FORBCO MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 106256 Transaction TvDe Fee Type Master DUD Date ~ee 1. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0,-- JUN 03,1997 $150.00 : 2. 41 ON-$~LE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE NA YES ¢ JUN 03,1997 $205.00 : 3. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 1 JUN 03,1997 $39.00 : TOTAL $394.00 Have you eve,-bccn Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted or' a Iclony? /,(/~t~') Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? Explain any "Yc~' ,m~wer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violam or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALDZORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date JUN 03,1997 Under penalty ~ l>c~ lu,'y. each person who~ s~gnature appears below. certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corpo,...,...amed in the foregoing applica. on. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof ,.,d that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or ,ndirect interest in the applicant or appl~c;ml's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer applicauon or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy ~hc pa.~ merit of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to g;.n or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application ma(~_ be withdrawn bv c.her Ihe applicant or the licensec with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant N~me(s) -'Appli~t Si ~re(s) BONA FIDE INVESTMENTS INC B~:/Kzmando M Rojo/Pres. attached ~BC-231 & 227 ABC 211 ~'~ /' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager, Jack Lam, AICP FROM: Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director BY: Joan A. Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY- OWNED EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION That City Council approval be given to surplus the City-owned equipment on the attached listing which is either no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. BACKGROUND The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of suplus property; materials and supplies, and capital equipment. It has been the policy of the City to request that the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Agent to dispose of City property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transfer to another department, trade-in, sale by bid or auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply trashing. As the replacement of various pieces of equipment has occurred, the miscellaneous items listed are surplus to our need and should be disposed of. As we have in the past, based on a priority listing, computer equipment will be donated to various organizations within the City if it is wanted. Respe. ctfully submitted, ('" La I. Attach. SURPLUS INVENTORY Line Item No. Description Serial Number CITY: Apple Keyboard Apple Mouse Mac Classic AP0411GU%M0312 LT102QQRC22 E 11018N M0435LL/A Apple Keyboard Apple Mouse Mac SE 424342 1295159 F84589XM5011 IBM XT Samsung Monochrome MB70604245 80102109 Apple Keyboard Apple Mouse Mac SE 424337 1028613 F824A74M5011 IBM AT IBM Keyboard NEC Multisync Colo 52065955170 263O24126 74D08562W Apple Keyboard Apple Mouse Mac SE 440159 1180338 F838BZ5M5011 IBM-XT.-PC Keyboard Samsung Monochrome 0145274 042244 744O2159 Compaq 386/25e Compaq Keyboard Compaq VGA MTR 4028HAL40722 0261146CA151 03714544M533 Line Item No. Description Serial Number CITY: Compaq Deskpro 286 Compaq Keyboard Compaq VGA Monitor Ethernet Card 4834AM3B2692 8291146PG339 83814544A017 N/A 678876 10 Apple Keyboard Apple Monitor Apple Mouse Mac lisi MA126107%M0312 9024559 MI1254CY25 F11394TAC53 11 IBM-PC-XT Keyboard Multisync Color Monitor Taxon 12" Monitor 6400936 9GBD001159 N/A 73 W716003 12 1044 Plotter 738D004 13 Belkin Auto Switch 2676 14 Centronic PG Ptr 8 662O8419 15 Centronics 358 107308 16 Compu Scan 821O5475 17 Diablo .630 Printer 86204610 18 Diablo 630 Shtfdr 17572459 19 Diconix Printer PAC6ZQ1684 20 Diconix Printer PAC6ZQ1682 Line Item No. CITY- 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Description Graph Plotter 7550 HP LaserJet 4 HP Plotter 7475A HP Plotter 7475A IBM Proprinter Laserwriter II NTR Laserwriter lint Laserwriter lint NBI 2000 Wkstn NBI Diablo 630 NBI Diablo 630 NEC 3550 Printer NEC 3550 Printer NEC Multisync Colo NEC Multisync Colo NEC Spin 7730 Shtf NEC Spinwriter 773 Serial Number 2631A 37473 JPBDO04906 2807V89128 2807V85916 4102001472096243 CA2389UY%M2016G/A CA824J7V%M6000 CA8407EX%M6000 GAl186018 86295832D63 86295833D63-1 541-685-121 541-688-456 77D04865J 74D90034W 112832B 5420617781 Line Item No. Description Serial Number CITY: 38 Okidata 293 607A0039076 39 Okidata 83A 230078 40 Okidata Micro 294 601A0003779 41 Okidata Micro 294 601A0003778 42 Onyx C5000 1 2906 43 Panasonic KXP11801 2DKBQA05570 44 Prime CPU FN019438 45 Prime PT200 8809-58089 46 Prime 330MB Disk Drive 500588 47 TEK PTR Model 4695 J025028 48 Tel Par Cash/Print 02-0020893730 49 Toshiba Cut S/F 07621817 50 Toshiba Expresswrt 20-0810710 5 1 Toshiba P321sl ZA43516 52 Toshiba P321sl ZA23241 53 Toshiba P341 PA1631'3 54 Toshiba P341 ZA12702 Line Item No. Description Serial Number CITY: 55 Toshiba P341 PA76313 56 Toshiba P341E ZY15155 57 Toshiba 341sl ZA46245 58 Toshiba 341sl ZA46002 59 Toshiba 351 ZA34320 60 Toshiba 351C ZA13978 61 Toshiba 351C ZA14302 62 Wang LB6613 63 Wang T15835 64 Xerox 4045 V33-506202 65 Xerox 4045 V31-415614 66 Xerox 4045 V33-506627 67 Ziyad S/F 002208 68 NBI 2000 Wkstn GA3067107 69 NBI Keyboard CA1676049 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 18, 1997 Mayor Alexander and City Councilmembers Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager Dave Moore, Recreation Supervisor APPROVAL OF LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTS FOR AN ALTA LOMA LITTLE LEAGUE TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD AT HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK JUNE 30-JULY 10, 1997 AND CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK JUL Y 18-JUL Y 26, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow for light use until 11:00 p.m. on the 90' baseball field at Heritage Community Park from June 30-July 10, 1997 and on the 90' baseball field at Red Hill Park from July 18-July 26, 1997. In addition, staff recommends light usage until 9:00 p.m. at Red Hill Community Park on Sunday, July 20, 1997. BACKGROUND The current Light Usage Policy provides that the light curfew is 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and light use variances to 11:00 p.m. have been permitted. No complaints from residents have been received. In recent years, the Council and Commission have approved a curfew variance only to accommodate extra inning play. ANALYSIS Alta Loma Little League and Citrus Little League have requested temporary light use variances to host their All-Star Tournaments. The Little Leagues have requested that usage be extended to 12:00 midnight at Heritage Community Park and 12:30 a.m. at Red Hill Community Park. The requested variance would apply only to the 90' base path fields located at these parks. Staff recommends that Council continue their current policy of providing curfew variances only for extended, overtime or extra innings which may be required for tournament play. Staff's recommended use of lights until 11:00 p.m. is in accordance with the Council's past approval practices. Light Variance June 18, 1997 Page 2 As in the past, the Leagues are required to provide a City approved notice to the neighbors a minimum of two weeks prior to the games. This notice has been required so that surrounding neighbors are aware that a variance has been permitted by the City to accommodate play and that any questions regarding use should be addressed to City or League representatives. The Leagues must distribute notices to the neighbors who adjoin the park. Respectfully submitted, ~ :'~Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUC;dvfONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Man~ EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution No. 91-012AA extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. BACKGROUND The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue with the negotiations with Comcast to insure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. DAB:kls Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 91-012AA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITH~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHF~REAS, the Franchise License granted to Comcast Cable T.V. by the County of San Bernardino and has been grandfathered into the City of Rancho Cucamonga:, and WI-~.REAS, negotiations are ongoing between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Comcast Cable T.V.; and WHEREAS, all terms and conditions of the current license will continue the same. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to extend the Franchise License for 90 days after the expiration of the currein County of San Bernardino License. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Robert Bowery, Info Systems Manager APPROVAL TO PURCHASE BACKUP SOFTWARE FOR PCS ON RISC/6000 NETWORK IN THE AMOUNT OF $45.000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 01-4161-3900, NOVELL FILE SERVER UPGRADES IN THE AMOUNT OF $35.000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 01-4161-3900 AND 01-4161- 7047. REPLACEMENT OF LIBRARY PCS IN THE AMOUNT OF $37.500 TO BE FUNDED FROM DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND (DPERF) FOR FISCAL YEAR 96/97. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council's approval to purchase backup software for PCs on RISC/6000 network in the amount of $45,000 to be funded from 01-4161-3900, Novell File Server upgrades in the amount of $35,000 to be funded from 01-4161-3900 and 01-4161-7047. Replacement of Library PCs in the amount of 37,500 to be funded from Data Processing Equipment Replacement Fund (DPERF) for Fiscal Year 96/97. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Before the close of the Fiscal Year there is need to purchase prior to June 30, 1997, budgeted computer hardware and software projects planned in Fiscal Year 1996/97. These items have been approved in this fiscal year budget but have not been implemented due to prior staffing vacancies. Staff vacancies have been filled and staff is ready to proceed. Pursuant to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Chapter 3.08 and in keeping with management policy, capital equipment purchases over $20,000 are to be submitted to Council for approval before ~ purchase order is issued. Specifically, included is the need to purchase a backup utility software for PCs, replace 15 computers in the Library and upgrade the Novell File Server, for a total of $117,500. This will provide greater computing capacity due to increased volume, backup capability of PCs centrally and needed computers at the Library. These items have been budgeted in the 96/97 Fiscal Year and are a high priority to fund before the end of the fiscal year. d7 Staff Report to City Council June 18, 1997 Page 2 Currently, the Library is experiencing consistent operational problems with older PCs due to age and lack of replacement parts. Staff is recommending replacement of these 15 computers at a cost of $37,500. This will fund from the Data Processing Equipment Replacement Fund. This will assist the Library and improve its daily computer operations. Respectfully submitted, empte Administrative Services Director ,LIT:RB:de DATE: TO:. FROM: BY: SUBJECT: lune 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager Mitch Slagerman, Senior Redevelopment Analyst APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. BACKGROUND: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate existing debt which will be repaid by the tax increment received. ANALYSIS: Each year, the Agency and City approve the annual loan transaction at about the time the budget is approved. During Fiscal Year 1996/97, the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay to the City $4,700,000 towards the principal and interest on the City/Agency loan. At the present time, it is necessary for the City to authorize the Agency to re-borrow the amount of $4,400,000. This item appears on both the Agency and City Council Agendas. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager ,,2 DATE: TO: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the'Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO 1 TO THE RETAIL SPACE LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND FOOTHILL VINEYARDS CENTER RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Retail Space Lease to identify the costs of tenant improvements for the community center facility to be $1,200,000. BACKGROUND: On October 2, 1996 an Agreement between the City, Agency and Foothill Vineyards Center (Lewis Homes) was entered into for the development of a 34,000 sq.ft. community center. The community center will be sited in a commercial space, previously occupied by a Gemco retail store, in the Rancho Towne Center which is on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Vineyard Avenue. The original cost estimates provided by Lewis Homes for the proposed tenant improvements was $1,000,000 with a $75,000 contingency for costs associated with the pro shop portion of the facility. As part of the lease agreement, Lewis will be providing $480,000 in tenant improvements to the project. The balance of the tenant improvement costs are to be paid from a Development Fee Pool, which Lewis may draw upon when paying a City or Fire District development fee. ANALYSIS After preparing the final plans, as well as receiving final bids from contractors through a bid process, Lewis Homes has informed the Agency that the cost of the improvements has increased. The bid process has provided a construction cost of $1,200,000, or $125,000' more than the original estimate including contingency. According to Lewis Homes, the cost increases are a result of the pro shop area being more clearly defined and cost increases for materials during the final bid process. In order to cover the increase in the tenant improvement costs the Community Center Development Fee Pool Agreement is proposed to be increased. The request for approval for the Amendment to the Community Center Development Fee Pool Agreement are on the agendas for the City, Agency and Fire District. The proposed Amendment No. 1 will make the necessary changes to the Lease so that both the Lease and the Community Center Development Fee Pool Agreement are consistent documents. Lewis Homes has indicated that construction on' the tenant improvements will begin immediately, and that the project should be complete in October of this year. This item appears on both the Agency and City Council agendas. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager DATE: TO: FROM: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire District Board Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO 2 TO COMMUNITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT FEE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Community Center Development Fee Agreement to allow an increase of $125,000 in the Development Fee Pool and to allow modification to language for assigning all or a portion of the Development Fee Pool to a non-Lewis commercial entity. BACKGROUND: On November 7, 1996 an Agreement between the City, Agency and Foothill Vineyards Center (Lewis Homes) was executed to allow for the development of a 34,000 sq.ft. community center. The community center will be sited in a commercial space, previously occupied by a Gemco retail store, in the Rancho Towne Center which is on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Vineyard Avenue. As part of the lease agreement, Lewis will be providing $480,000 in tenant improvements to the project. Amendment No. i to the Community Center Development Fee Agreement, executed on January 16, 1997, added the Fire District to the Agreement. The purpose of the Community Center Development Fee Agreement is to reimburse Foothill Vineyards Center for Tenant improvements associated with the construction of the community center. At the time the original agreement was executed Foothill Vineyards Center had provided construction cost estimates based on the programming identified by the City and preliminary design plans. However, the plans had not been fully completed. The Agreement allowed for $520,000 for the tenant improvements, with a contingency option of increasing the amount by $75,000 to cover the possible increase in costs associated. ANALYSIS After preparing the final plans, as well as receiving final bids from contractors through a bid process, Lewis Homes has informed the Agency that the cost of the improvements has increased. The original estimate provided by Lewis Homes has increased by $125,000 beyond that which was provided for in the previous Agreement. According to Lewis Homes, the cost increases are a result of more clearly defined plans and final bids. In order to cover the increase in the tenant improvement costs, it is recommended that the Development Fee Pool be increased by $125,000 beyond that which was allowed in the original Agreement. The development fee pool is used by Lewis Homes when they pull a permit with the City or the District. Instead of paying the permit fee by a check, a letter is issued by Lewis requesting a draw from the development fee pool amount. As with the current development fee pool, the proposed additional development fee pool amount will be paid over time to the City and the District. Based on current levels of development activity, approximately $200,000 from the development fee pool will be used annually. Lewis Homes has requested a minor language modification dealing with the assignment of a portion of the development fee pool to a non- Lewis commercial entity.' Currently, the Agreement allows for assignments to occur in $20,000 increments for commercial and residential projects. Lewis has asked that the language be modified to allow a transfer, with no minimum amount, of the Development Fee Pool to a non-Lewis commercial entity which is developing a commercial or retail use on Lewis owned property within the City. Non-Lewis residential development assignments will remain in $20,000 increments. This language modification is acceptable to City staff. Lewis Homes has indicated that construction on the tenant improvements will begin immediately, and that the project should be complete in October of this year. This item is related to a proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Retail Space Lease for the community center. This item appears on the Fire Board, Agency and City Council agendas. Respectfully submitted, Linda D Daniels Redevelopment Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Susan M. Stark, Finance Officer SUBJECT: AUTHORI%ATION OF TEMPORARY FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 APPROPRIAT! J-:NS AND ARTICLE XIII B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT RECOMMENDATION: , Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the Temporary Fiscal Year 1997-98 Appropriations. . Council approve the attached Resolution adopting the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for the Temporary Fiscal 1997-98 Appropriations. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 96-096 on June 19, 1996 authorizing certain positions, salary ranges, and benefits for fiscal year 1996-97. The City of Rancho Cucamonga also approved the Amended Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget on May 21, 1997. As it is anticipated that it will be several months into the 1997-98 fiscal year before a formal budget will be adopted, it is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing an extension of existing salary ranges and benefits and approve as temporary 1997-98 appropriations those budgeted amounts included in the amended 1996-97 budget, excluding capital and fixed assets. This will allow the City to appropriate those funds necessary to the due process of conducting business and meeting payroll until such time as a formal budget is adopted for fiscal year 1997-98. TEMPORARY FISCAL YEAR !997-98 APPROPRIATIONS General Fund Special Revenue Funds $ 29,700,470 16.406.100 $ 46,106,570 . The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the City Council. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the City's population. The J June 18, 1997 AUTHORIZATION OF TEMPORARY FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 APPROPRIATIONS AND ARTICLE XIII B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Page 2 of 2 additional attached resolution adopts the annual appropriation limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. calculation of 4.7% and a population change of 0.24%), the City's fiscal year 1997-98 limit is $26,500,709. The City's temporary fiscal year 1997-98 appropriations subject to this limit total $2,508,390. It would be unrealistic to project a Gann Limit status at June 30, 1998 without a formal budget including capital projects. However, it is anticipated that the City will be at 74.4% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 1997. Respectfully submitted, Susan M. Stark Finance Officer Attachments: 2 sms:buddisk:wp\tmp98stfrpt RESOLUTION NO. 97- ~ 7~/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 APPROPRIATIONS NECESSARY TO THE DUE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING BUSINESS AND MEETING PAYROLL WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approved the positions, salary ranges, and benefits for fiscal year 1996-97 on June 19, 1996, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approved the Amended Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget on May 21, 1997, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council will not be approving a new budget for fiscal year 1997-98 at this time; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 18th day of June 1997 as follows: SECTION 1: AUTHORIZATION OF TEMPORARY FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 APPROPRIATIONS. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Amended Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget, excluding capital and fixed assets, on file in the office of the Finance Officer, is hereby adopted in the amount of $46,106,570 and shall temporarily govern expenditures during fiscal year 1997-98. This budget total includes appropriations for personnel and operational items in both the general and other special purpose funds. SECTION 2: AUTHORIZATION TO CONTINUE THE APPROVED POSITIONS, SALARY RANGES. AND BENEFITS. The City of Rancho Cucamonga approved positions, salary ranges, and benefits for fiscal year 1996-97, on file in the office of the Personnel Officer, is hereby authorized to remain in effect until amended or rescinded. SECTION 3: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN AND / OR WITHIN APPROPRIATIONS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the budget. The City Manager may transfer funds between appropriations within any fund as set forth in the budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any cost center in the same fund. SECTION 4: TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN FUNDS. Transfers of funds between funds as shown throughout the fund transfers section of the budget shall be made as expenditures warrant such transfers. Resolution No. 97- D 7 ] Page 2 SECTION 5: DISBURSEMENTS. The City Manager and the Finance Officer, or the duly designated representative, are hereby empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to appropriations provided for in the Temporary Fiscal Year 1997-98 Appropriations, and have the responsibility to establish procedures and to administratively implement and control the budget on all matters, except direct expenditures by Councilmembers which require Council approval. SECTION 6: ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS. The City Council may amend this temporary budget to add or delete appropriations. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: . . Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk sms:97-98buddisk:wp\tempreso98 q7 RESOLUTION NO. 97- 7d RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said Article XIIIB, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it to be in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1997-98, and; WHEREAS, the Finance Officer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that said appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1997-98 be established in the amount of $26,500,709. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that an appropriation limit for the Fiscal Year 1997-98 pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of $26,500,709 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk sms:97-98buddisk:wp\tempreso98(pg3) 1997198 GANN INITIATIVE APPROPRIATION LIMITS I. Base Appropriation Limit Total Appropriations (1978-79 Rev. Budget) Encumbrance Reserves (audit report) Less approp. not subject to limit Less Non-Proceeds of taxes Add Excess Fees Cost Base Appropriation Limit 1978-79 II. Cumulative Growth Rates Cumulative Growth Rates Since 1978-79 Fiscal Year. 1996-97 568.65% 1997-98 601.54% III. Appropriation Limits 3,777,483 6.6865 25,258,014 = 1996-97 Limit 5,790,989 422,841 (1,062,340) (1,777,682) 403,675 3,777,483 3,777,483 7.0154 26,500,709 = 1997-98 Limit Appropriations Non-Tax Proceeds 1996-97 Amended 52,411,900 (33,608,730) Sub-Total: 18,803,170 Plus Excess Fee Cost APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT: 18,803,170 * Per City/Fire District Transfer Of Funds Agreement As Approved June 8, 1995. 1997-98 Temporary BudQet 36,117,120 (33,608,730) 2,508,390 0 2,508,390 1997/98 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCHEDULE TO CATEGORIZE REVENUE SUBJECT TO GANN INITIATIVE Actual Proceeds From Taxes Sales and Use Tax Cigarette Tax Business License Real Property Transfer Tax Property Tax Homeowner's prop. tax relief Transient Occupancy Tax Admissions Tax Unitary Tax Utility Users Fee Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Trailer Coach Fees Off Highway License Fees Highway Carriers Alcoholic Beverage Fees Interest Earnings on Tax Proceeds Revenue from - Agencies SB 154 Bail-Out funds P/Y Fund Balance (Note 1) Used to balance budget Amended Per Audit Budget 1978/79 1996197 1,087,787 9,200,000 106,857 0 173,027 840,000 136,437 225,000 203,800 1,619,000 0 55,000 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 6,000,000 584,301 4,600,000 0 0 649 1,850 5,853 0 13,476 0 63,131 1,180,110 26,517 0 214,000 0 Temporary Budget 1997198 9,200,000 0 840,000 225,000 1,619,000 55,000 120,000 0 0 6,000,000 4,600,000 0 1,850 0 0 1,180,110 0 0 335,131 0 0 Tax Proceeds 2,950,967 23,840,960 23,840,960 Non-Tax Proceeds 2,840,022 33,6138,730 33,608,730 Total Revenue 5,790,989 57,449,690 57,449,690 Note 1: This total was allocated on a ratio as categories bear to total revenue due to pdor year data not available as the City incorporated on 11/77. DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NO. 14803, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEASTERLY SIDE OF ELM AVENUE, EAST OF SPRUCE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO., ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF DEDICATION A 26-FOOT WIDE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND RELATED PURPOSES BETWEEN ELM AVENUE AND DE ANZA DRIVE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 14803, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record and accepting the Offer to Dedicate a 26 foot wide storm drain easement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract No. 14803, located on the northeasterly side of Elm Avenue, East of Spruce Avenue in the Low- Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 28, 1996 for the division of 7.23 acres into 43 residential lots and lots A and B for trail/open space purposes. The Developer, Lewis Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts' Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit: $367,000.00 $183,500.00 $ 4,650.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT NO. 14803 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. June 18, 1997 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A Condition of Approval of the map requires converting an existing storm drain from private to public maintenance. The storm drain is in the adjoining parking lot of Coyote Canyon Elementary School. The storm drain, with a temporary inlet, was constructed as part of the adjacent Parcel Map 14788. This temporary inlet will be replaced with standard catch basins in the proposed De Anza Drive and will collect and drain public waters. To satisfy the condition, the City must accept an existing open Offer of Dedication per section 66477.2(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. The original offer of Dedication for a 26 foot wide easement was rejected at the time Parcel Map 14788 was approved by the City Council on June 5, 1996. Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments 17 32 33 19 20 22 31 30 29 27 23 2,4 25 DRIVE 0 26 ~ // / , 34 35 . 36 37 ~ ~ 38 ~ ~ 39 ~ r~' 4o ~ · CITY OF RANCR0 CUC.~IONGA ENGIN ~:~:KING DIVLgION 'ri'r~ 7~. Iq~o a .73 RESOLUTION NO. q 7-Z} 7,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14803, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 14803, submitted by Lewis Development Co. and consisting of 43 lots and lots "A" and "B" located on the northeasterly side of Elm Avenue and east of Spruce Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 28, 1996, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14803 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Lewis Development Co. as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 14803 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 26 FOOT WIDE DEDICATION ON PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 14786 BETWEEN ELM AVENUE AND DE ANZA DRIVE AS OFFERED FOR STORM DRAIN AND RELATED PURPOSES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolves as follows: Section 1: The offer to dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, the property herein described for storm drain and related purposes, is hereby accepted. Said property is described as follows: That certain piece of land, 26 feet wide, over a portion of Parcel 1 of and as shown on Parcel Map 14786, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 180 of Parcel Maps, pages 87 and 88, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Section 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cahse a certified copy of this resolution to be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT NUMBER 14803 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. '"--- EXHIBIT 'A' --""- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 CITY MAINTAINED AREASJ~ GROUND COVER- 4,230 SQ. FT. ~ TURF / SOD - 5,534 SQ. FT. ~ 31 30 '~~o 29 27 tO 23 24 25 33 34 35 ,, 36 ', ::3 37 ~ ~ , · z z 39 ,10 ~ ~ · 41 ,t3 STREET LIGHTS- · NUMBER OF STREET TREES - 46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TRACT 14803 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: TRACT NO. 14803 STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L S1 --- S4 *2& 13 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000L 22,000L 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L4 -0- · Turf Non-Turf Trees S.F. S.F. Ea. 5,534 4,230 46 * Existing items installed with original project. This tract will add 13 street lights. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units Bv District Parcel DU S1 S4 L4 N/A 43 43 43 43 Annexation Date: June 18, 1997 Form Date 11/16/94 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR TRACT NO. 14803 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAKDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 11 th day of June, 1997, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 11 th day of June, 1997, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager, FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF CHURCH STREET WITH SPRUCE AND EAST ELM AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said' agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The installation of traffic signals at the intersections of Church Street with Spruce and East Elm Avenues was a condition of approval placed on several recent Terra Vista Projects, including Conditional Use Permits 93-49, 96-21 and Design Review 96-32. The Developer, Lewis Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $250,900 Labor and Material Bond: $125,450 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectively submitted, City Engineer WJO:BAM:sd Attachments City of Rancho Cucamonga N o - SIGNAL LOCATION VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT CHURCH STREET AND SPRUCE AVENUE AND AT C/qURCH STREET AND EAST ELM AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 3, 1997, by Lewis Development Co. as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located south of Church Street and north of Foothill Boulevard between Haven and Milliken Avenues; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as CUP 93-49, CUP 96-21 and DR 96-32; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: o That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR THE ALLEY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-32, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 320 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT 9777 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY FOOTHILL AUTO BODY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit No. 95-32 was approved by the Planning Commission on the 8th day of May, 1996, for the expansion of a legal non-conforming auto body shop located in the Community Commercial District of Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 320 feet east of Archibald Avenue at 9777 Foothill Boulevard. As a condition of approval the Developer is required to improve the alley behind the property and for the alley to be constructed, operational and accepted thereof by the City prior to issuance of a City building permit. Therefore, the Developer, Foothill Auto Body, has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the alley improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Materialmen Bond: $22,067.00 $11,038.00 All other conditions of approval associated with the conditional use permit still apply, including the annexation into the Landscape and Lighting Districts, and shall occur at a later date. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer Attachments ~,~WJO:JAD:dlw /'- % VICINITY MAP FOOTHILL BOULEVARD l[ ......... ~;~,~-' .~ ~ % t ~ . i . ,' .... '-- C.' F ' ~--- ,l , e .... ~,~ k,..~.,l~.~l: ~*-,. ', ~ .. -~ - ', 4 I-:-',~' 1 .... ~,J ', .. ~ :,,~~. INTERIM SITE PLAN i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROJECT: CUP 95-32 File: h:\cxhibit\cup95-32 RESOLUTION NO. q '7 - Z) 7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE~NT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE ALLEY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-32 WHEREAS, the City Council. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement submitted by Foothill Auto Body, for the alley improvement within the City of Rancho Cucamonga public right-of-way, generally located behind 9777 Foothill Boulevard, APN: 208-282-03 and 04; and WHEREAS, the installation of such alley improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-32; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the General Plan to modify the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan, Figure III-7A, by eliminating the segment of community trail from Youngs Canyon Road across the San Sevaine Basin and modifying all applicable exhibits therein. Staff has prepared a Notice of Categorical Exemption. APNS 226-112-02 and 03. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to modify the proposed Wardman Bullock Road/Youngs Canyon Road, between Wilson Avenue and Cherry Avenue by eliminating the landscaped median and across the San Sevaine Basin by reducing the pavement width and eliminating the equestrian trail and modifying all applicable exhibits therein. Staff has prepared a Notice of Categorical Exemption. APNS 226-102-17, 226-111-05 and 06, 226-112-02 and 03, 226-311-27, 226-321-01. · PROJECT DESCRIPTION' A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: The portion of the project west of the San Sevaine Basin is surrounded by vacant land zoned Low Density, 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre. The portion of the project across the San Sevaine Basin is surrounded by area owned and operated by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. It is designated open space to be utilized for Chino Groundwater Basin recharge. B. General Plan Designations: The proposed designation for Wardman Bullock Road/Youngs Canyon Road is a future Special Design Secondary Street. C. Site Characteristics: The planned location for the street is currently undeveloped land covered with light vegetation and gently sloping to the southeast. ANALYSIS: The Etiwanda Specific Plan currently reflects a freeway interchange just south of the intersection of Youngs Canyon Road and Cherry Avenue. Caltrans has now located the planned interchange within the City of Fontana at Summit Avenue, east of Cherry Avenue (reference Exhibit B). In response to this change and in an effort to reduce the amount of City maintained landscaping, staff is proposing to eliminate the raised landscaped median. The level of service of the proposed street will not be altered by this modification. The change will reduce the City maintained area by a ten foot wide sectional area which is proposed as a painted median. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 97-01B AND ESPA 97-01 June 18, 1997 Page 2 The portion of the street across the San Sevaine Basin will be constructed by the City as development of the area dictates. The street through this area will be lined with street trees and provide a sidewalk on the south side for pedestrian access to Cherry Avenue in conformance with the pedestrian trails and sidewalks shown in Figure 5-19 of the ESPA (reference Exhibit C). The pavement section will be reduced to allow for four travel lanes. The painted median will be narrowed and the trail will be eliminated across the basin. This design will provide for a minimum reconstruction of the basin. The request to remove the trail segment crossing the basin was recommended by the Trails Committee on May 8, 1997. References to 24th Street on the affected exhibits will be corrected to read Wilson Avenue per Planning Commission Resolution 95-25, approved June 14, 1995. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, the City Council can make the following findings regarding this application: D. The proposed modification is a minor alteration to a planned road and is categorically exempt per section 15305, class 5 Minor/literations in Land Use Limitations of the California Environmental Quality Act. E. The proposed amendment conforms with the policies and objectives of the General Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daiiv Bulletin newspaper the area was posted and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and homeowners in Tract 13566. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 97- 01B and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 97-01 by approving the attached Resolution and Ordinance and issue a Notice of Exemption. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:MP Attachments: EXHIBIT A - Vicinity Map EXHIBIT B - State Highway Plan EXHIBIT C - ESPA, Pedestrian Trails & Sidewalks, Figure 5-19 EXHIBIT D - Figure 5-34, existing EXHIBIT E - Figure 5-34, proposed EXHIBIT F - Figure 5-34A, proposed EXHIBIT D - Resolution Approving of GPA 97-01B EXHIBIT E - Ordinance Approving of ESPA 97-01 WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD YOUNGS CANYON ROAD CITY OF ~ANCH0 CUCAMONGA ~NGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: Vicinity Map TITLE: Wardman Bullock .Youngs Canyon Section Z 0 0 " !... ,~ -- u. O~ ~o u,I o Q =: ~jO Z' AS ¥]dCX~ AS OU ~33U~ 3qAA1 i 01t 3NI~A3S N~S .-. 3AV S/~UA 13 3AY 3AV J. SY3 ~JAY VQNVdll I A.] EXHIBIT B rN i~11. me: o WILSON AVENUE " · .// ~ i / '1 · - ~ ~ ~-- / z ' I ID WA K '~ ~ -'V ~' · ~ IMPROVED S E L S + .'-~/ Hiking / Pedestrian ' . '''-- Trails(~.dImprovement.) .~ /,,'~:.:,,-~>~ ~ . ~i~.~.~ Foothill blvd. S.P. ~,.ow .w- ~ .....,b,~title "'-" iJ~ ,,[ PEDESTRIAN .~j ,,=! TRAILS & ~i ~-[' LSIDEWALKS figurel - 7D EXHIBIT C c:) r: u i c: i:::: n 10/16185 N/E LOOP Between 24th and 1-15 FIG. 5-34 EXISTING EXI-IIBIT D 7/ N/E Large Columnar Tree Type A Large Columnar Tree Type A Equestrian Trail / 7' 4 7' 32' ,j, 32' ," 20' 102' ROW ,, / WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD / YOUNGS CANYON ROAD Between Wilson and San Sevaine Basins FIG. 5-34 S/VV PROPOSED EXHIBIT E 731 Large Columnar N /5'~L 54' Large /,Columnar Tree Type YOUNGS CANYON'ROAD Between San Sevaine Basins and Cherry Avenue FIG 5-34A PROPOSED EXHIBIT F 7,...3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, TO MODIFY THE PROPOSED WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD/YOUNGS CANYON ROAD, BY ELIMINATING THE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AND REDUCING THE PAVEMENT WIDTH AND ELIMINATING THE EQUESTRIAN TRAIL ACROSS THE SAN SEVAINE BASIN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. o The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the amendment described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." . On the 14th day of May 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of Eftwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 97-01. o On the 18th day of June 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY DETERMINE AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: The Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. . Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public heating on May 14, 1997, and to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 18, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a strip of land, of varying widths, extending southerly from Wilson Avenue and curving southeasterly to Cherry Avenue, planned to be Wardman Bullock Road/Youngs Canyon Road and is presently vacant undeveloped land. ORDINANCE NO. Page 2 o o b, The proposed modification is a minor alteration to a planned road and is categorically exempt per section 15305, class 5 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations of the California Environmental Quality Act. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: ao The proposed modification is a minor alteration to a planned road and is categorically exempt per section 15305, class 5 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations of the California Environmental Quality Act. be The segment of community trail crossing the San Sevaine Basin does not conform with the policies and objectives of the City's trail system. c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The City Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility the proposed amendment will have an effect on the environment and therefore, the proposed amendment is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15305. . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby approves Eftwanda Specific Plan Amendment 97-01 to amend the Street System, Figure 5-6, the Community Trails, Figure 5-18, Proposed Wardman Bullock/Youngs Canyon Road Section, Figure 5-34 and Proposed Youngs Canyon Road Section, Figure 5-34A, as shown on exhibits 1 through 4 attached hereto. o ° The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days aRer its passage at least. once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City Rancho Cucmaonga, California. WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD YOUNGS CANYON ROAD i WILSON AVENUE 5-39 Ay!I 5-35A 2 Freeway Accee, Major Arterial ITEM: ESPA 97-01 TITLE: EXHIBIT 1 :- Secondary Arterial '"'"'""" Special Design / IllIIIIIIIIN ,, Collector /:::::t~'::'::~:" ?;~iT=jJ' Local :Street, " .....' ...... ~' ~ Figure Number Location / ...... · _.~o~.:/,..:~ ,,+ , / ~::>,5-20 ~ ./, ·: rtltle figure' .~W l,e~J -_, , _: -- il(; ,:,L,. ':il 7~ I#11tllllllfill14 [1#1111111111111 WILSON AVENUE ~! w '"'"'"'""~'"'"'"'":' · -/;~..--~"-.:.;,:::::"...,:'::".,,.',:'.' '.".".'"."."- .g~..~:'.v:'.v:'.'".': :'.":'""""".'": "'"'"'"~' : /~_.,.. ""' ....'"""'"'""'"'""'""'"'"'"'""~'"' ....' ....'""7~'"' I ~1~ · -.' ~ =_t.~: · : I: ,. i: : .: "'-' ~'-'--~ i"-': " : I .:: mm~rE 3o .... '- ~ AVr.:'; 1 : .. ~ ~,~ ' , I ..... .... - . /. ~ --.- Equestrian Trails ~ ................Bike Lane* or Bike Route* .,,,, Av. ~//.~/ (On Pavement Shoulder) . ..~// :~,:::-,,.. .....,,.~.:~,,:.~:.:......//////,.,-...-Bike Path (In Parkway) ~-~ ~ ~~.A .__,~///.. '~[ ...... Foothill Boulevard /~/:....'..i/]:" :~': ':/'::'"'!:"':' ~-:.~///Specific Plan //// ,,! ~ * Consult Trill Implementetlon Plan ~ · A~OW ~w~ ~ ~tit le figur e'! : i " TRAILS ~ I I I -- I~ Ii I i : ITEM: ESPA 97-01 'T~T"PT 1~. L'qYTTT'DT'T~ '") 77 REVISED 9/7/88 REVISED 4/1/92 NIE Large Columnar Tree Type A : ~ Large ~, _{ Columnar j~/Tree Type A · J~"/ Equestrian ~~ T=i~ · 7' 4 7' 32' ~ 32' ~' / 20' 102' ROW ~ / WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD I YOUNGS CANYON ROAD Between Wilson and San Se~aine Basins FIG. 5-34 S/W ITEM: ESPA 97-01 TITLE: EXH~IT 3 Large Columnar Tree Type A~.,,~ ~ Large .Columnar Tree Type A 5"' 54' 71' YOUNGS CANYON ROAD Between San Sevaine Basins and Cherry Avenue FIG 5-34A ITEM: ESPA 97-01 TITLE: EXI-I.~.~!T 4 RESOLUTION NO. q 7- d) 7 ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01B, TO MODIFY THE HIKING AND RIDING TRAILS MASTER PLAN, BY ELIMINATING A SEGMENT OF COMMUNITY TRAIL AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the amendment described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." , On the 14th day of May 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 97-01B. . On June 18, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. . Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public heating on May 14, 1997, and to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 18, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant undeveloped strip of land which extends from the westerly boundary of the San Sevaine Basin easterly to a future intersection at Cherry Avenue. b. The segment of community trail crossing the San Sevaine Basin does not conform with the policies and objectives of the City's trail system. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 C. The proposed modification is a minor alteration to a planned road and is categorically exempt per section 15305, class 5 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations of the California Environmental Quality Act. Be Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public heating and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in . paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: ' ao The proposed modification is a minor alteration to a planned road and is categorically exempt per section 15305, class 5 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations of the California Environmental Quality Act. Do The trail segment across the San Sevaine Basin does not conform to the Policies and guidelines of the City's trail system. 4, This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility the proposed amendment will have an effect on the environment and therefore, the proposed amendment is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15305. . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 97-01B to amend the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan, Figure III-7A as shown on exhibit 1 attached hereto. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ITEM: GPA 97-01B TITLE: EXHIBIT 1 APPENDIX E NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, California 95814 FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Clerk of the Board San Bernardino County Auditor/Controller-Recorder 222 W. Hospitality Lane San Bernardino, CA 92415-0018 Attention: Engineering Division ESPA 9 7-01 Project Title Wardman Bullock RoaaYYoungs Canyon Road between Wilson Avenue and Cherry Avenue Project Location- Specific Rancho Cucamonga Project Location - City San Bernardino Project Location - County Change to a proposed road within the Etiwanda ~pecoqc Plan. Eliminate median to reduce future maintenance costs. Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project City of Rancho Cucamonga Name of Public Agency Approving Project City qf Rancho Cucamonga Name of Person or Agency 'Carrying Out Project Exempt Status: (Check One) X Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. Minor alterations in Land Use Limitations 15305 Class 5 Reasons why project is exempt: Maria Pere~. 909 477-2740 23! 4 Contact Person Area Code Telephone Extension If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No ... Date Received for Filing William J. Alexander, Mayor CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer CONSIDERATION TO ORDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15012, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOURTH STREET BETWEEN BUFFALO AVENUE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 1 AND 6, SUBMITTED BY OLTMANS INVESTMENT COMPANY. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions ordering the street vacation of a portion of Charles Smith Avenue, approving Parcel Map 15012 and accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map and vacation to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map No. 15012, located on the north side of Fourth Street between Buffalo Avenue and the I-15 Freeway in the General Industrial District (subareas 12 and 13) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 1997 for the division of 62 acres into 4 parcels and for the street vacation (V- 146) of a portion of Charles Smith Avenue. On May 21, 1997, the City Council passed Resolution No. 97-061 declaring its intention to vacate said existing street and set the date of June 18, 1997, in the City Hall Council Chambers, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation No. 146. Easements will be reserved or provided for all existing utilities, including the public storm drain in Charles Smith Avenue, or abandoned as directed by the affected utility companies. Vacated street roadway pavement areas will be removed and the sites improved by and as private developments OCCur. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 15012 - OLTMANS INVESTMENT COMPANY June 18, 1997 Page 2 A property owner, of the parcel between Charles Smith Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway east and southeasterly of San Marino Street, has voiced his concern of the resulting traffic circulation from this vacation. He is concerned that with this vacation the direct access to Fourth Street is removed and there will be no east-west street connecting Buffalo Avenue and Charles Smith Avenue. Parcel Map 15012 is conditioned to only build a cul-de-sac on Charles Smith Avenue at 600 feet south of San Marino Street. The Industrial Specific Plan does indicate an east-west street which would cut across the proposed Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 15012 connecting the two aforementioned streets. It is feasible and the opportunity still exists to construct the street across the 23 acre Parcel 3. The issue of the east-west street will be addressed at the time of development of the 23 acres. The Developer, Oltmans Investment Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the Charles Smith Avenue (cul-de-sac) street and storm drain off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit: $275,400.00 $137,700.00 $ 2,600.00 Copies of the agreement, security and the vacation Map No. V- 146 are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O~Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments tll I I P ~,0 P O~ !~ID VAC..~T I 0 I'J PAR OF__. PARCEL- PA~r' E-L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA ENG~~G DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7-Z~ ? ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15012, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15012, submitted by Oltmans Investment Company, and consisting of four parcels located on the north side of Fourth Street between Buffalo Avenue and the I-15 Freeway, being a division of 61.9 acres in the General Industrial District (subareas 12 and 13) of the Industrial Area specific Plan was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 9, 1997, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15012 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Oltmans Investment Company as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related highway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 15012 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7- ~ ~d~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAiN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15012 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3& STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 I ! '1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~x14tlst'r "A" STATE OF CALIFORNIA e~. ~OI 2 STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L S1 --- S6 '1 &4 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: PARCEL MAP NO. 15012 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000L 22.000L 27.500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Turf Non-Turf Trees S.F. S.F. Ea. * Existing items installed with original project. This Parcel Map will add 4 street lights. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 1 9 18 9 2 4 8 4 3 23 46 23 4 20 40 20 · Total 56 112 56 L3B 9 4 23 2O 56 Annexation Date: June 18, 1997 Form Date 11/16/94 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 15012 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WILLIAM J. O'NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 11 th day of June, 1997, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 11 th day of June, 1997, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. · / ?/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO ±700 FEET SOUTH OF SAN MARINO STREET WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 97-061 passed on May 21, 1997, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.m. on June 18, 1997, in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION !: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that a portion of Charles Smith Avenue fi'om Fourth Street to ±700 feet south of San Marino Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No. V- 146 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibits "A" and "B", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, set forth in Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. EXJtl~rr "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FOR STREET VACATION (V-146) BEING THOSE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE (ROCHESTER AVENUE), IN ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE BOUNDARY PLAT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11222, RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGES 57 THROUGH 60, PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT TIlE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 45, MAP OF ROCHESTER, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID CHARLES SMITH AVENUE. 88 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN BOOK 44, PAGE 4, OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID RIGHT OF WAY BEING THE ARC OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY~ HAVING A RADIUS OF 1056.00 FEET, AND THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74° 34' 55" WEST; TttENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 179.43 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9° 44' 07" TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN, THROUGH WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 64° 50' 48" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 29° 01' 00" EAST, 17.21 FET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE WH/CH IS 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE, BEING THE ARC OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1070.00 FEET THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 64" 18' 26" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 22.86 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1° 13' 26", TO THE END TI:[EREOF; THENCE CONTI3fffING ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 26° 55' 00" WEST, 334.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1130.00 FEET; TH'ENCE SO~STERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 530.12 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26° 52' 45" TO TIlE END TI:rEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 0° 02' 15" WEST 279.94 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET, 60.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 44, PAGE 4; EXHIBIT "A"(V-146) pa~,e 2 THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 89° 57' 26" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH ~ CENTERLINE OF SAID CHARLES SMITH AVENUE (ROCI:H~STER AVENUE), SAID POINT BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN ~ NORT!~RLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SArl~ FOURTH STREET; TI:~NCE SOU'I~ 89° 58' 12" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 30.00 FEET TO ~ EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF sam CHARLES SMITH AVENUE (ROCI:~STER AVENUE); TF!~NCE NORTH 0° 02' 15" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE 279.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1070.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 501.97 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26" 52' 45" TO ~ END TI:!EREOF; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 26~' 55' 00" EAST, 317.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED MARCH 24, 1972, IN BOOK 7893, PAGES 418 AND 419 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 29" 05' 48" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 16.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH IS 44.00 FEET EASTERLY OF SAID CENTERLINE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE (ROCHESTER AVENUE); THENCE CONTINUI3IG ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 26° 55' 00" EAST 25.57 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1144.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG ~ ARC OF SAID CURVE, 120.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6° 01' 01", TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LIIN'E OF ROCIq'!~STER AVENUE, 60 FEET WIDE AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 44, PAGE 4, THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 69° 06' 01" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 0° 10' 55" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL L .IlgE, 174.03 FEET TO ~ NORTttEASTERLY LINE OF THE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 7893, PAGES 418 AND 419 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAIl) COUNTY; EXI:tIBIT "A"(V-146} oa~,e 3 THENCE SOUTH 29° 05' 48" EAST ALONG SAID LINE 61.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION ~ ~ CENTERLINE OF SAID ROCI:rESTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 44, PAGE 4; THENCE NORTH 00° 10' 55" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ROCI~ESTER AVENUE 355.51 FEET TO TH~ PROLONGATION ON THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTH LINE OF LOT 45; TI~ENCE SOUTH 89° 38' 00" WEST 81.14 FEET ALONG SAID NORT!~ERLY LINE OF LOT 45 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH T~La.T PORTION OF LOT 46, MAP OF ROCHESTER AS RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGE 20 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMM~ENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ~ WEST LINE OF ROCI:YESTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 44, PAGE 4, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FOURTH STREET; THENCE, NORTH 00° 10' 55" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 863.90 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGlIT OF WAY LINE OF 1-15 AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 7661, PAGE 893, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, BEING TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, CONTINUING NORTH 00° 10' 55" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 61.70 FEET TO ~ POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH TI~.T PORTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 1-15, PER DEED IN BOOK 7893, PAGES 418, AND 419, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID SO~STERLY LINE, SOUTH 29° 05' 48" EAST, 33.56 FEET TO ~ POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH ~ WESTERLY LINE OF SAID ROCHESTER AVENUE; THENCE SoLrrH 27° 01' 51" WEST ALONG ~ AFOREMENTIONED SAID WESTERLY RIGI:IT OF WAY LINE OF 1-15, 36.34 FEET TO ~ POINT OF BEGINNING. Ru~gll 3. Mullins ~ PLS 3712 EXP. 6/30/00 THE PARCELS DESCRIBED ABOVE ARE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP, EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO AND M~r~' 4, PART HEREOF. DFTAI! -1 NOn u~E LEGEND: LOT 45 ,~ = 18'00'00' R = 89.00' L = 27.96' '~" ;~ /---FOUND 2 I/4' ~4.',.~ ~ /CAL. D.O.T. ---~:;~_~ I, ,/RS ./~ L = 129.26' NSg'49'OS'W ~ I\ 23.00' : N25'30'19'E ~/ ~ / \ · '- ~ .~/~'~ (~ = 9-,~,,or L = ~ 79.43' ~ = 6'01'01" \ ~" ,",- ~.~,\ -12o. 14' / ~,_-,, PROPOSED STREET \_~.~,,~"~~._ ~.~ RIGHT OF WAY ~,/. ~ ~ N64'18'26'E STREET TO BE VATTED -- TR-- -- ~- ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~1~ OF CENTER UNE S~E~ () ~. ~,~.~-~ ~ ~ BEGINNING P~ *A' , (~) ~ ~ - ~o~ ~ / /~~( ./ / ~,. ,~ ~ ~'~ 61.70~/ //-' ~ ~ ,.,~. ~/12 S~ PARCEL 'A' V-146 EXHIBIT- B TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT 'A' SHEET # 1 OF 2 LEGEND: N.T.S. PROPOSED STREET RIGHT OF WAY STREET TO BE VACATED CENTER LINE STREET II 30130I~- S8g'58'12"E I:~ 30 00' S89'57'26'E ,//'r"'-- 213.01' 30.00L_~_-~ ) ~ ' SEE SHEEl' F I OF 2 28'23'51' z '-' R = 850.00' L = 421.29' L,J L,J I ' 'kj~.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , RUSSELL ~1. NIULU ~ '~,. PLS 3712 EXP. V-146 , ,~., · ~, ,~- .'.~ "b" ~ ,-~ ~,, /~. ,, ~.~ ,;:~' · EXHIBIT- B TO ACCONIPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT 'A' SHEET # 2 OF 2 EXitBIT "C" RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE VACATION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE (V-146) THE VACATION OF THE STREET DESCRIBED IN EX!:H~IT "A" OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE VACATION (V-146) PERTAINS ONLY TO THE USE OF SAID DESCRIBED LAND FOR STREET PURPOSES. ALL STORM DRAIN AND IYFILITY USES ARE RETAINED AND EXCEPTED THAT EXIST IN PLACE OR BY LICENSE, EASEMENT OR DEED OF RECORD ON THIS DATE OF RECORDING FIE. RETO. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner CONSIDERATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - CHAVlN DEVELOPMENT - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This amendment would allow any property owner within the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1 to request a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Mixed Use Public Storage facility. A Conditional Use Permit application would be reviewed by the Planning Commission to determine if the subject property is suitable for the use and that said use would be compatible with surrounding uses. On September 11, 1996, the Planning Commission initiated an amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to conditionally permit Mixed Use Public Storage within the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1. This was in response to a request by Chavin Development to develop and operate such a use on the south side of Foothill Boulevard at the juncture of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. The Commission determined that Mixed Use Public Storage would be consistent with the intent of the Community Commercial designation and with Specific Plan goals to promote high quality development along Foothill Boulevard which is complimentary to other uses. The Commission also recommends that a master plan be required to ensure that development of a Mixed Use Public Storage facility'would not prevent adjacent properties from being developed in a manner consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan. On May 14, 1997, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment. Copies of the Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes of the May 14, 1997, meeting are attached. FACTS FOR FINDING The proposed amendment is consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the General Plan. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FBSPA 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT June 18, 1997 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily bulletin newspaper as a public hearing. Public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within Subarea 1 and within 300 feet of the project site and to all persons who testified at the Planning Commission meeting regarding this matter. To date, staff has received three phone calls from surrounding property owners inquiring about the location of the proposed amendment. No formal complaints have been received by staff. Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:gs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report of May 14, 1997 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes of May 14, 1997 Planning Commission Resolution 97-26 Resolution approving Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 97-01 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT May 14, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, Associate Planner FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: Chavin Development desires to develop their property at 8363 Foothill Boulevard, which is on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. The facility is proposed to include public mini-storage behind office/retail, and a caretaker's quarters. On September 11, 1996, the Planning Commission conducted a Pre-Application Review workshop on the conceptual development plans and initiated an amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to conditionally permit Mixed Use Public Storage in the Community Commercial designation of Subarea 1. While office and retail uses are permitted in the Community Commercial designation, public storage is not permitted anywhere within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. In addition to the Specific Plan Amendment, staff is currently processing a Conditional Use Permit for development of the proposed facilities. ANALYSIS: In order to reduce potential conflicts, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan groups together land uses which are compatible because of similar intensities. The Subarea 1 Community Commercial district is a triangular area surrounded by Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road to the north, rail road tracks/residential to the south and east, and residential to the west (see Exhibit "A"). The Community Commercial portion is intended to promote the establishment of neighborhood/district level commercial goods and services accommodating the needs of more than one neighborhood or subarea including centers with one or more major tenants accompanied by a variety of multi-tenant uses. Public storage is not an allowed use anywhere within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area but is allowed in commercial and industrial land use designations in other parts of the City, typically as a conditionally permitted use. Chavin Development's proposal for mixed use will allow the opportunity to group office and retail components towards the public street frontage with the storage component located internally/to the rear. Such a program would be consistent with the intent of the Community Commercial designation and with Specific Plan goals to promote high quality development along Foothill Boulevard which is complimentary to other uses. It would allow property within the district to be developed to its full potential given the angular rear property lines (adjacent to rail road tracks) and property depth which tends to preclude conventional retail development. Furthermore, requiring a master plan with a development proposal, such as is required for Mixed Use district, would ensure that the development would not prevent adjacent properties from being developed in a manner consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FBSPA 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT May 14, 1997 Page 2 The following definition of Mixed Use Public Storage is proposed by staff: "Mixed Use Public Storage - Activities include the rental or lease of small-scale enclosed storage units or parking spaces when in combination with retail or office uses. Uses typically include self-storage facilities with caretaker's residence and recreational vehicle storage. Storage shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from Foothill Boulevard and screened from view. Does not include automotive fleet storage, rental car lots, or overnight storage of service vehicles." As a conditionally permitted use, Mixed Use Public Storage would require approval of a Conditional Use Permit which involves a public hearing, the ability to attach conditions, and revocation authority. Through the Conditional Use Permit process, the Commission would hear public testimony and consider the compatibility of the specific project with surrounding land uses. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The proposed amendment is exempt from environmental review per California Environmental Quality Act Section 15061(b)(3). FACTS FOR FINDING: The proposal is consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the General Plan. The proposal will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or uses and will not cause adverse environmental impacts. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all property owners in Subarea I and within 300 feet of the project site. No comments have been received as of the writing of this report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of this amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution. Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Subarea 1 Map Exhibit"B" - Summary of Allowed Land Uses Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit"D" - Location Map (Applicant's Proposed Sitei Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Minutes dated September 11, 1996 Resolution Recommending Approval to City Council Draft City Council Resolution Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Part IV, Section 9 .~ ~.~ . IJJ Z. EXHIBIT "A" IV-10 4/97 Foothill Boulevard Spec.ific Plan Part IV, Section 9 RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Libraries and Museums, public and private Liquor Stores Messenger and Wire Services ~~' Mixed Use Public Storage Subarea One SC CC O MR C C P P C4 Mortuaries and Cemeteries Music, Dance, and Martial Arts C P Studios Newspaper and Magazine Stores P P P Nurseries and Garden Supply p Stores within enclosed area Office, Business Machine and P P Computer Component Stores Office Supply Stores P P Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper 'p Stores Parking Facilities (commercial where fees are charged) Parks and Recreation Facilities, public and private Pet Shops P P Photocopy (Xerox) P P Political or Philanthropic Headquarters Public and Private Clubs and Lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, and similar Youth Group Uses Record and Tape Stores P P Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards Restaurants ('sit down): a) with entertainment and/or C C C cocktail lounge, bar b) incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail P P P lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing) c) cafe, limited to 20 seats P P P (Including outdoor seating) d) Fast Food: with drive-thru C without drive- P P thru Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI3 C C C C P P P P C C p p2 C P C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C P P P P P p2 p2 p2 Refer to RRC(2) Section 9.9.2 footnotes All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to Part IV, Section 9.1.3. ~ EXHIBIT "B- 1" ~-~*-~'l IV-6 4/97 Foothill Boulevard Spec.ific Plan Part IV, Section 9 Land Use Mixed Use Public Storage (subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to Part IV, Section 9.1.3) Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios Newspaper and Magazine Stores Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores within Enclosed Area Office, Business Machine, and Computer Component Stores Office Supply Stores Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores Pet Shops Photocopy (Xerox) Record and Tape Stores Restaurants (sit down): a) With entertainment and/or cocktail lounge/bar b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) d) Fast Food (with drive-thru) (without drive-thru) Shoe Stores and Shoe Repair Shops Specialty Retail Sporting Goods Stores: a) Specialty; backpacking, tennis, skiing, mountaineering, fishing, etc.) b) General; encompassing a variety of sports equipment Supermarkets Swimming Pool Services and Sales Tailor Shops Toy Stores SC CC 0 MR P EXHIBIT "B-2" IV-19 4/97 /O.5' Henry S. Chavin 8939 Vernon Ave. Suite A, Montclair, Ca. 91763 (909)920-3736 - Fax (909)920-0885 March 17, 1997 Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Specific Plan Amendment for Proposed Retail/Office & Self Storage - San Bernardino Road & Foothill Blvd., Rancho ¢ucamonga, CA. Dear Mr. Buller and Planning Commission: This Letter of Justification for a Specific Plan Amendment will follow up our Pre-Application Review 96-04 of September 11, 1996 meeting with the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, Brad Buller, City Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner and Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer. This 3.8 acre site is situated in Subarea I of the Foothill Corridor Specific Plan and right now contains a small office located at the front area and a single residential house at the Southwest area of the property. I have learned that working within a Specific Plan provides conceptual direction to the ultimate plan, but that the size, depth and location of each owner's property, specifically this Bear Gulch area, imposes on each owner different needs and hardships and these issues should be addressed and dealt with separately. The current plan to develop the area known as "Bear Gulch Village" to Community Commercial would be difficult to achieve due to the present poor economic conditions and the extraordinary circumstances of the property; such as its irregular shape and deep depth and limited public access. An Amendment to The Specific Plan is a justifiable request for the following reasons: Brad Buller, City Planner Planning Commission March 17, 1997 Page 2 1. The Specific Plan limits the intended use of this property does not take into consideration the very special circumstances of this parcel such as its deep depth which does not apply generally to other property or uses in the same class or district. 2. Carrying out portions of the existing Specific Plan would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship in the development of this property not created by or attributable to the owner of the property and therefore the property would remain in a vacant and undesirable state. 3. The preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the subject property, which is possessed by other properties previously developed will be given to this parcel if the Amendment is granted. 4. Granting this Amendment to the Specific Plan will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or materially injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity because at the present time the neighborhood consists primarily of commercial uses; Therefore acceptance of this Specific Plan Amendment will not change the character of the neighborhood, the Amendment will improve the property, create jobs and services to the community and will be a positive development. 5. The granting of a Specific Plan Amendment will be compatible with the general purpose of and intent of the City in doing this zoning and will not adversely affect future development elsewhere. Therefore the Specific Plan should be amended to read as follows: Self-Storage is to be' permitted on property situated in the Foothill Corridor Specific Plan Subarea I, where the property has a minimum of 350 FT. frontage, a minimum 325 FT. depth and a minimum set back of 100 FT. from Foothill Blvd. for the self-storage use. I believe the Planning Commission will appreciate the improvement in this area and the merits of this project, and will adopt the proposed Amendment to the Foothill Corridor Specific Plan Subarea I. I hope I have given you an adequate summary of our proposed project. Brad Buller, City Planner Planning Commission March 17, 1997 Page 3 I want to thank the Planning Commission, yourself and your staff in advance for all of your help and time in reviewing our proposed development. Again, thank you for your attention to this matter. Very Truly Yours, CC: David Buxbaum John Chakmak Tom Francis Chuck Marvich, Architect CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting September 11, 1996 Chairman Barker called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:35 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room of the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: STAFF PRESENT: PRESENT: David Barker, William Bethel, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, ABSENT: Peter Tolstoy Brad Buller, City Planner;, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements. NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 96-04 - CHAVIN - A review of mixed use development on 3.8 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. Mr. Chavin, applicant, introduced his team to the Commissioners. He described the constraints of the site, the proposed mixed use development, and the design of the project. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. She described the physical and environmental setting for the site and identified the following issues: master planning, access, circulation and alignment of San Bernardino Road, orientation of parking up front versus building up front, and conformity of building design with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Chairman Barker opened the hearing for Commission discussion. Commissioner McNiel agreed that the building design is consistent with the Specific plan; however, he felt the east and west elevations have to be architectural treated because these two sides are subject to public view. He accepted having parking spaces up-front, using the front portion of building for retail, and having a mini-storage facility behind it. He stated that he could only support one driveway off Foothill Boulevard. He agreed with staff's recommendation to require master planning. He stated he is very concerned with the proposed metal material for the buildings in the back. Commissioner Bethel stated he is very concerned with the access off Foothill Boulevard because of traffic hazards. He preferred a longer stacking distance for the driveway. He commented he is not in favor of metal buildings. Commissioner Macias agreed with the comments made by Commissioners McNiel and Bethel. He recommended that the applicant focus on designing an access that is safe and address the current EXHIBIT "E" ~-I~"1 lid traffic hazards. He agreed that additional architectural treatment should be provided to the east and west elevations. He suggested that the applicant use special landscaping design to complement the project and use colors that are compatible to the architectural style of the proposed building and the existing Sycamore Inn. Chairman Barker cautioned the applicant on the use of metal material for the mini-storage buildings. He stated that the designer has to prove that the material will work in meeting the City's design cdteda. He reiterated the traffic hazards on this stretch of Foothill Boulevard and that the design of the access must improve the current condition. He agreed that the building design for the retail portion is consistent with the Specific Plan and reminded the applicant to use real dver rock if rock veneer is used. Brad Buller, City Planner, summarized the comments and concerns raised by the Commission as follows: The orientation of the building and the parking spaces are acceptable, access and circulation should be designed to address the current traffic issues, the architecture for the retail building should follow craftsman style in design and material, the choice of colors for the buildings should follow the colors for that architectural style and provide compatibility to the existing Sycamore Inn, the use of metal materials for mini-storage buildings is a concern, and finally, the east and west edges of the project that face adjoining property should be aesthetically treated and upgraded. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet Secretary Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 1996 /// RESOLUTION NO. 97-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Chavin Development has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 97-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 14, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 14, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: and a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; c. This amendment will allow for refinement of the list of allowed uses in Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific-Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c. This amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97-26 FBSPA 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT May14, 1997 Page 2 d. This amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the purposes of the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1; and e. This amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the amendment identified in this Resolution is not defined as a project and is therefore exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Foothill Boulevard Plan Amendment No. 97-01, amending Part IV, as shown in the attached City Council Resolution. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MAY 1997. ISSl~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E. David idarKer, Chairman ATTEST: ~', I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of May 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:' BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 9 7-' ~ ~2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN. A. Recitals. 1. Chavin Development has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 97-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of May 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 97-26, recommending that the City Council adopt this amendment. 3. On June 18, 1997, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public headng on June 18, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use' Policies of the General Plan; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. //'/ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FBSPA 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT June 18, 1997 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced pubic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts'set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Resolution is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 97-01, to modify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as shown on the attached Exhibit "A'° as well as any related text, tables, figures, and maps to maintain consistency. //5 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Part ~ Section 9 Industrial: · Light Industrial LI Mixed Use: · Mixed Use/Retail MUIR 9.1.2 Land Use Definitions "Specialty Retail" - This use is typified as small shops and boutiques which specialize in limited product lines of unique and novel designs and/or purposes. Specialty Retail is defined as follows: Any retail business not listed separately in Section 9.3.2, 9.5.2, 9.7.2, and 9.9.2 which limits its sales to product lines of singular purpose or of unique and special design (i.e., cutlery shops, small household or personal appliances, kitchenware, novelty gifts, etc.). Service businesses are not specialty retail use. · Limited to a business area of 3,000 squar. e feet totally within an enclosed building. Office and administrative use is ancillary to the specialty retail uses and should not exceed 50 percent of the gross floor area in any integrated Specialty Commercial Center or a master planned development. Through the Conditional Use Permit process, the percentage of gross floor area for office and administrative use may exceed 50 percent subject to the Coh~mission's findings that the development meets the intent of Specialty Retail, is a benefit to the community, and furthers the goals of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ff'"""M~xed Use Pubhc Storaoe - Activities ~nclude the rental or lease of small-scale enclosed'~~l~ ~5, storage units or parking spaces when in combination w~th retml or office uses. Uses ,)typically include self-storage facilities with caretaker's residence and recreational vehicle '")storage. Storage shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from Foothill Boulevard and /screened from view. Does not include automotive fleet storage, rental car lots, or Lovernight storage of service vehicles. ~ "Restaurants with Entertainment and/or Serving of Alcoholic Beverages" - This use is typified as a full service dining facility with major portions of the floor area and business operations being devoted to the on-site preparation and consumption of food. Entertainment activities should be limited to ancillary support functions which shall form a minor part of the floor area and business operation. The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be in conjunction with restaurant usage and the availability of full listed menu items. The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages shall cease when such menu items are not available to customers. 9.1.3 Master Plans The intent of a master plan is to provide for integrated development. at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the master plan, there is an opportunity to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal strip commercial development. -.- EXHIBIT "A- 1" IV-2 4/97 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Part IV, Section 9 RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Libraries and Museums, public and private Liquor Stores Messenger and Wire Services .~.~, Mixed Use Public Storage Mortuaries and Cemeteries Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios Newspaper and Magazine Stores Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores within enclosed area Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores Office Supply Stores Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores Parking Facilities (commercial where fees are charged) Parks and Recreation Facilities, public and private Pet Shops Photocopy (Xerox) Political or Philanthropic Headquarters Public and Private Clubs and Lodges, including YMCA, YVVCA, and similar Youth Group Uses Record and Tape Stores Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards $C Subarea One CC O MR C P P C4 P P P P P P P P P P P P Subarea Two P SC CC 0 MR MHR SC C C P P C P C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Restaurants (sit down): a) with entertainment and/or C C C C C cocktail lounge, bar b) incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail P P P P P P lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing) c) cafe, limited to 20 seats P P P P P P (Including outdoor seating) d) Fast Food: with drive-thru C C without drive- P P P P thru Subarea Three Subarea Four CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI3 C C C p p p p2 P P P p p p p p2 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p2 p p p p2 P P P P C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C P P P P Refer to RRC(2) Section 9.9.2 footnotes All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to Part IV, Section 9.1.3. ~ EXHIBIT I'A- 2" IV-6 4/97 /17 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Part IV, Section 9 Land Use Mixed Use Public Storage (subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to Part IV, Section 9.1.3) Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios Newspaper and Magazine Stores Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores within Enclosed Area Office, Business Machine, and Computer Component Stores Office Supply Stores Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores PetShops Photocopy (Xerox) Record and Tape Stores Restaurants (sit down): · a) With entertainment and/or cocktail lounge/bar b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) c) Care, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) d) Fast Food (with drive-thru) (without drive-thru) Shoe Stores and Shoe Repair Shops Specialty Retail Sporting Goods Stores: a) Specialty; backpacking, tennis, skiing, mountaineering, fishing, etc.) b) General; encompassing a variety of sports equipment Supermarkets Swimming Pool Services and Sales Tailor Shops Toy Stores SC CC 0 MR P C P P P P P EXHIBIT "A-3" IV-19 4/97 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE On June 10, 1997, the Route 30 Task Force convened in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. There were 10 Task Force members in attendance. Several community members from the area surrounding the proposed Camelian and Route 30 Freeway interchange were also present. During the Oral Communications portion of the meeting, residents expressed an interest in learning more about the Carnelian offi-amp and its implications. Residents stated there have been meetings in the area in conjunction with Neighborhood Watch meetings concerning the Route 30 Freeway. The residents indicated they will continue to have meetings on this issue. Chairman Alexander suggested the community members contact staff to receive additional information for presentation at their group meetings. The Chairman also suggested that members of this group could meet with City staff at City Hall and review drawings and other documents pertinent to the freeway in an effort to help the area residents become more familiar with the issues regarding the freeway. The residents indicated they hope to take advantage of these opportunities and stated they have published a newsletter tbr their group with issues regarding the freeway. SANBAG representatives informed the Task Force that design is continuing on all segments of the Route 30 Freeway. The accelerated schedule for sound walls and bridges is under review, and it now appears due to right-of-way conflicts, work on bridges in Rancho Cucamonga will most likely not begin until 1998. SANBAG representatives indicated the schedule for items included in the Task Force packet has been changed. SANBAG is working on a new agenda which will be disseminated to the Task Force when available. SANBAG also indicated the funding for the freeway is on target, and they project enough money will be available to construct the freeway from the Los Angeles County line to Sierra Avenue in Fontana. The Caltrans representative indicated the I-15/Rt. 30 interchange is on schedule, and all plans have been approved by Sacramento. The project is scheduled to go out for bids next month, and it is anticipated work could begin as early as February 1998. This crucial intersection is the kick-off project for the Route 30 Freeway. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE UPDATE June 18, 1997 Page 2 The Task Force also discussed the issues of landscaping and lighting and requested that staff member Brad Buller, who has working with the Joint Powers Authority, be present at the next Task Force meeting to present an update on landscaping. The Task Force also requested the issues of the Isles House, the Carnelian interchange and Caltrans contracting with private companies be place on the next agenda. The next meeting of the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force will be Tuesday, September 2, 1997. Res~ctfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:sd DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN THE ALTA LOMA CHANNEL DISTRICT NO. 84-2, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 86-2 AND MILLIKEN SOUTH OF ARROW DISTRICT NO. 89-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within the Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, the Rancho Cucamonga Storm Drain District No. 86- 2 and Milliken South of Arrow District No. 89-1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The fee is calculated on a fiat fee basis of the current rate of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel (e.g., a percentage fee basis would inflate the base price per parcel). The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public are funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. Respectfully submitted, Administrative Services Director LIT:IYB:de Attachment: Resolution J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has heretofore- undertaken proceedings pursuant to the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to esta'blish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest theron, not to exceed the Treasureifs estimate of the expenses of collection, and in any case not to exceed 85.00 per lot or parcel. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with currect information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge. when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) RECOMMENDATIOl_~ It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual special tax levy of 814,670 an acre per parcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothfil Marketplace). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on March 15, 1994 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. While the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for fiscal year 1997/98 is adjusted downward to $14,670 per acre. This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each parcel of taxable property to pay for the facilities and to discharge bond obligations and other debt of the district. Respectfully submitted, Lawrenc~l~l~mple Administrative Services Director LIT:IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Exhibit 'A~ Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"}; and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1997-98 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: ao Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded. indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Co Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor 1,,45 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 BACKGROUND On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd., on the east by ErJwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maximum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 The first annual tax rate of $14,670 for fiscal year 1997/98 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $398,000. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $392,710 $ 35,180 $ 1,000 $ o $428,890 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX $14,670 PER ACRE $ 0 $ 8,650 $432.500 $441,150 0 ~L I IF'" /3, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing an annual special tax levy of $297.48 an acre per parcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1984 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. Bonds were issued in August of 1985 in the amount of $18,000,000 to finance the construction of the Day Creek Channel. In 1986, the area between Milliken, Rochester and Highland and the northerly city limits was annexed into the district. On April 1, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-079 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in May, 1992 in the amount of $16,530,000. The maximum rate for the special tax was set at $550 per acre when the district was formed. Since the formation, the rate has been $350.00 per acre and the Redevelopment Agency contributes the difference in the rates. However, with the authorized bond refunding the adjusted rate has been $297.48 or a savings of $52.52 per acre to the property owners. Respectfully submitted, Administrative Services Director LIT: IYB: d e Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Annual Status Report Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1997-98 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: ao Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Co Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resoiution No. Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor Resolution No. Page 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRiCT NO. 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) EXHIBIT "A" The Community Facilities District has been divided into two zones: 1. ZONE "A": General areas to be served by the drainage facilities, exclusive of Zone "a", 2. ZONE "B": A limited area, being only partially served by drainage facilities. Zone "B": consists of those properties bounded on the south by FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASELINE ROAD, and on the West by MILLIKEN AVENUE. The rate, method and formula for the levy of the special tax for the respective zones, being Zone "A" and Zone "B", is as follows, based upon an estimated bond amount of $16,530,000. ZONE "A": $297.48 PER ACRE. ZONE "B": $297.48 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES. For the purpose of defining the maximum special Tax, "ACRE" shall mean acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as shown on the latest San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JUNE 1997 BACKGROUND On June 26, 1984, the electors within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. In August 1985 bonds in the amount of $18,000,000 were issued to finance the construction and installation of public capital drainage. facilities to serve and provide drainage protection to all properties located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). In March of 1986 the area bounded on the west by Milliken Avenue. on the north by the northerly City limits, on the east by Rochester Avenule and on the south by Highland Avenue was annexed into the district. The first annual special tax rate of 8350 per acre was set by City Council in Fiscal Year 1985/86~ This rate has never been increased in the ensuing fiscal years. However, on May 5, 1992, the City conducted a refunding of this district. Bonds were issued for $16,530,000.00 to cover the remaining debt. The savings from this refunding were passed on to the residents and decreased the special annual tax from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre. Under the Loan and Pledge Agreement the Redevelopment Agency contributes sufficient funds each fiscal year, that when combined with the special tax meet the requirements of the annual debt service payment. All phases of construction for the Day Creek Drainage System are completed. The construction contract was administered by the County of San Bernardino. FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 The current rate of $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1997/98 along with the Redevelopment .Agency contribution of $1,000,000 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $1,745,550. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $1,745,550 $ 115,560 $ 1,000 $ 102,060 $1,964,170 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $ 28,300 $ 38,510 $ 897,360 $1.000.000 $1,946,170 $297.48 PER ACRE DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual benefit assessment levy of ninety-two dollars and seventeen cents ($92.17) per parcel for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Batsin). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and/or servicing of a 27+ acre-foot desiring basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2, Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Drainage Area No. 91-2 was a developer initiated district. Protection of the properties from the overland flows was necessary in order to receive development rights from the City. The costs associated with the maintenance of the district was intended to be passed onto the property owners as they would receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the general public. Construction of homes are now in progress and are being placed on the market for sale. There are 350 homes that will be constructed. The total annual cost for maintenance is thirty-two thousand, two hundred and sixty dollars ($32,260) for a total cost to each home of ninety-two dollars and seventeen cents ($92.17) Respectfully submitted, Administrative Services Director LTI:IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Annual Supplement to Final Engineer's Report Map RESOLUTION NO. ~ 7- ~ <~--~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997- 1998 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council a Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report") to the Final Engineer's Report Drainage Area No. 91-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for fiscal year 1997-1998 (the "Final Engineer's Report"); and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for fiscal year 1997-1998 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in fiscal year 1997-1998. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for fiscal year 1997-1998. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for fiscal year 1997-1998 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA William J. Alexander, Mayor Rex GutielTeZ, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Debra Adams, City Clerk Joe O'Neil, City Engineer JUNE 1997 / ¥/ Resolution No. Page 4 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TAB LE O F C O NTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A- Description of Service Exhibit B - Cost Estimate Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule Map Resolution No. Page 5 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUA~L SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982" This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1998. le DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. . COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. , BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefitted from the proposed services. Reference is made the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91-331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Resolution No. Page 7 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the district from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris which accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved' spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the desilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rain fall, this se~ice may be required more frequently. EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1997-1998 Cost of Annual Maintenance Desilting Basin Channel Subtotal $22,500 $ 6,640 $29,140 Incidental Expenses City Administration Subtotal 3,120 3,120 C. Total Annual Costs $32,260 D. Contribution $0 E. Balance to Assessment $32,260 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 1997-1998 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Engineer, by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the fiscal year 1997-1998. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Cost of Maintenance Cost of Improvements Incidental Expenses Total Costs Contribution Balance to Assessment $29,140 S o $ 3.120 $32,260 $ o $32,260 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the senrice to be provided. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. Resolution No. Page 10 The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineefts Report in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA The benefit assessments are those as confirmed' in Column I, unless a different figure appears in Column II, as modified. ASSESSMENT PROPER1Ar AMOUNT OF NUMBER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT 225-471-01 to 58 225-481-01 to 42 225-491-01 to 19 225-451-01 to 35 225-451-39 to 58 225-461-01 to 60 225-072-68 Total 350 Residential Parcels 832,260.00 $32,260.00 Iq7 Resolution No. ~ Page 11 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). There is no increase from the current tax rate for developed properties from Fiscal Year 97/98 rates. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. Special Tax A- Drainage Facilities Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) II (3077-3589 S.F.) III (2564-3076 S.F.) IV (2308-2563 S.F.) V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) Undeveloped Property $944 $699 $524 $420 $349 $245 $1,526/acre Special Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Tax B - Law Enforcement I (3590 + S.F) II (3077-3587 S.F.) III (2564-3076 S.F.) IV (2308-2563 S.F.) V (2051-2307 S.F.) VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $1.oo $1.00 $1.oo $1.oo $1.oo $1.oo CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT C.F.D. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) June 18, 1997 Page 2 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community. Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to finance drainage facilities, police operations and maintenance costs. The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services are listed in Special Tax B - Law Enforcement. When the collections are received by the City, the funds are transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. Respectfully submitted, Temple Administrative Services Director LIT:IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 1997/98 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "a". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and ~ame procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1997. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William J. Alexander, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXI-HBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1997/98. SPECIAL TAX "A" - DRAINAGE FACILITIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which are identified as follows: DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. , UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: (i) owned by a public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX "A" RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A" rates for Fiscal Year 1997/98 are as follows: TaxinK Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $944 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential II $699 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential III $524 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV $420 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Taxing Classification Eo Residential Class V {2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Tax Rate $349 per year F. Residential Class VI $245 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * G. Commercial or industrial property $2,030 per acre per year ** . UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $1,526 per acre per year *** The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX "A" Special Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses"). The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1' The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for from Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax "A" levy is to be established (the "Required Special Tax "A" Revenue"). STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 91% of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue for such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. STEP 4: STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall: ao Compare (i) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A". The Base Maximum Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to 50.054 per square foot of the lot or parcel. B° If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate described in (i) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. SPECIAL TAX '~" - LAW ENFORCEMENT All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "B". The authorized Special Tax "B" rates for Fiscal Year 1997-1998 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I 51.00 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential Class II 51.00 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential Class III 51.00 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV 51.00 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * E. Residential Class V 51.00 per year (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * F. Residential Class VI 51.00 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * G. Commercial or industrial property 51,000 per acre per year ** ,. "1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, Principal Planner UPDATE ON ISLE HOUSE PRESERVATION EFFORTS RECOMMENDATION Staff will continue to monitor and report on the preservation efforts. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 4, 1997, staff presented a report to the City Council regarding preservation concerns relative to the Isles House and the Route 30 Freeway. Both the Etiwanda Historical Society (EHS) and CALTRANS representative John Hotchkiss made presentations to the City Council. Additionally, the HPC has, by minute action, voted to support the EHS's efforts to preserve the Isle House. As indicated previously by the CALTRANS representative, extensive work on relocation is premature until the current ownership status is resolved. As of June 11, 1997, the property owner has not responded to the State's purchase offer. Staff will continue to work with CALTRANS, SANBAG, HPC, and EHS and report regularly to the City Council in accordance with the following general guidelines: 1. Monitor on a weekly basis CALTRANS efforts to purchase the site. , Contact State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and CALTRANS to provide input on the marketing plan for the residence. , Conduct preliminary analysis and discussions of alterative relocation sites within the Etiwanda Community. CORRESPONDENCE Copies of this staff report were mailed to: John Hotchkiss, CALTRANS; David Clark, SANBAG; Carolyn Holke, EHS CiTy Planner 157 DATE: TO: FROM: BY' SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, Principal Planner DISCUSSION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES RECOMMENDATION Provide staff with direction relative to any desired changes. BACKGROUND The importance of Historic Preservation has been long established in the City as illustrated by its planning process. The City's General Plan has several strong policies relative to historic preservation and, in 1988, the City Council adopted a Value Statement on Historic Preservation (see attached copy, Exhibit "A"). In addition, excerpts of the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance relative to the purpose and duties of the HPC are contained in the attached Exhibit "B." On June 4, 1997, the City Council directed staff to report on the current organizational structure of the Historic Preservation Commission and possible alternatives to augment current historic preservation activities. This report is intended to provide historic background on the preservation duties and responsibilities of the HPC. In 1993, the previously separate seven-member HPC was consolidated into the five-member Planning Commission. This decision was part of a City-wide consideration of the five City Commissions existing at the time, to achieve streamlining as well as cost savings. In making its determinations, the City Council relied on a study by D.M. Griffin and Associates, dated July 1992. This study was initiated to respond to fiscal constraints imposed by the economy and State actions relative to reducing local revenues. During the first half of the current decade, the streamlining of City services led to cutbacks and a redirection of the majority of the Planning Division's resources to the requirements of development processing. Since this period of time, the Planning Division's activities in historic preservation have been limited to reactive situations (i.e., development and demolition requests as part of a project proposal) involving, for the most part, planners processing development project proposals. While the maintenance of the previously prepared historic sites list has continued, the ongoing research, and outreach information, as well as preservation promotion, has been curtailed. The reassignment of HPC duties to the Planning Commission has enabled a streamlining of applicable application processing in the cases of related development processing. In addition, the Planning Commission has done an excellent job in processing historic preservation applications with a total of; four points of historic interest, seven landmark alteration, and ten landmark CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HPC ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES June 18, 1997 Page 2 designation applications, since July of 1993. In discussions with property owners that have been involved in these applications, the reassignment of responsibility is less confusing and easier to understand than the previous process involving two separate Commissions. ANALYSIS Staff has contacted several agencies about information relative to the use of historic preservation commissions. The requested information has not arrived in time to include in this report, but should be available at the City Council meeting. The consolidation of the HPC and Planning Commission has had some benefit to the economic development of the community by streamlining the development review process where historic resources are involved. The limitations of staff resources has curtailed the ability of the City to conduct the previously active preservation out-reach activities. The curtailment of these activities has placed the City in the perceived view of having to respond to individual situations rather than longer-term study and promotion of historic preservation goals and objectives. Given the fact that today's fiscal resources are more limited, the Council may want to consider the following possible actions: Encourage the existing historic preservation groups to form a unified Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Society that would meet and advise independent of any City Commission or staff. As a volunteer group, provide support in the form of meeting space and auxiliary staff support services. , Establish a Historic Preservation Advisory Committee to provide ongoing input on individual historic resources and issues to the HPC and City Council. This group would be similar to the current Trails Advisory Committee that meets approximately once a month, as needed. , Establish appropriate ad hoc CC/HPC Task Force Committees to work closely with community preservationists on specific issues or projects; i.e., Isle House Relocation, Fisher House preservation, Pearson Garage Preservation, and Landmark Designation Program. Re~.~_ctful!y submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:LJH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit A - Community Values Statement Exhibit B - Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance Excerpts Community Values The City of Rancho Cucamonga On Historic Preservation We, the members of the City Council, City Commissions, and Professional Staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga are dedicated to the protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of structures and sites of historic, architectural, and engineering significance located within the City which are of cultural and aesthetic benefit to the community. We believe that the economic, cultural, and aesthetic standing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be enhanced by representing the heritage of the City through its commitment to: Designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate those historic structures, landscapes, streetscapes, districts, and sites which contribute to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; Foster civic pride in and awareness of the beauty and accomplishments of the past by establishing adequate educational programs and events which will make the public aware of the valuable heritage which exists in the City; Stabilize and improve the economic value of historic structures, landscapes, streetscapes, districts, and sites by educating the property owners of such sites as to the improved property values and tax incentives for the preservation of such property; Protect and enhance the City's cultural and aesthetic heritage and encourage both public and private participation in all aspects of funding rehabilitation efforts and educational awareness programs; Promote and encourage continued private ownership in the rehabilitation and maintenance of such buildings, other structures, landscapes, streetscapes, districts, and sites now so owned and used to the fullest extent possible under the objectives previously listed. Approved by the City Council on this 7th day of April, 1988. EXHIBIT A The purpose of the HPC is specified by City Municipal Code Section: 2.24.010 Purpose. It is found that the protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of structures and sites of historic, architectural, and engineering significance, located within the city are of cultural and aesthetic benefit to the community. It is further found that the economic, cultural and aesthetic standing of this city will be enhanced by respecting the heritage of the city. The purpose of this chapter is to: Ao Designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate those historic structures and sites which contribute to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of Rancho Cucamonga; B. Foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past; C. Stabilize and improve the economic value of certain historic structures and sites; D. Protect and enhance the city's cultural and aesthetic heritage; Eo Promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of such buildings, other structures, and sites now so owned and used, to the extent that the objectives listed above can be attained under such policy (Ord. 70 S1, 1979). The HPC power and duties are specified under City Municipal Code Section: 2.24.070 Commission Power and Duties. The Historic Preservation Commission shall have the power and duty to: A. Administer the provisions of this chapter; Bo Perform such other advisory functions as may be delegated from time to time to the Historic Preservation Commission by the City Council; Co Cause to be maintained a current register of landmark designations for public use and information (Ord. 70 S7, 1979). HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ORDINANCE EXCERPTS EXHIBIT B. DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .._~q..' STAFF REPORT ' ' ~ ...¢, June 18, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AREA RECOMMENDATION Provide staff with direction relative to Sphere of Influence issues. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This item is a follow-up from the City Council Workshop held on June 4, 1997, at which Mr. James Roddy, Executive Director of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) spoke regarding his agency's role and the City's Sphere of influence. A significant amount of information concerning LAFCO and the City's Sphere is contained in the attached copy of the City Council memorandum dated May 21, 1997. At Council's request staff contacted the County Planning Department and received a list of projects that are within the City's Sphere of Influence. This list is attached as Exhibit "B" for reference. CORRESPONDENCE None Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:LJH:taa Attachments: Exhibit"A"- City Council Memorandum dated May 21, 1997 Exhibit °'B"- County Projects List CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PARK AND FACILITIES ITEMS BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council has expressed a desire to be more informed of the park and facilities issues, programs, projects, and events. Pertinent information includes special events bookings, updates on current and future programs, fee structures for programs, status of senior and youth events, and status of facility capital projects. This information is currently made available to Council members through various updates and reports submitted by diffferent departments. Council can consider the following options for even greater emphasis on information: Park and Facilities Report: Staff develop a monthly report with consolidated park, facility, and recreation information for the entire City Council. In this manner, the various information and data would be more readily available. Regularly Scheduled Agenda Item: Designate a "Park and Facilities Update" agenda item to be scheduled on a regularly monthly basis. Similar to the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force reports, this item would be agendized for every second Council meeting for staff to present consolidated information to the City Council on pertinent issues, projects, and programs. Park and Facilities Subcommittee: City Council Subcommittee to meet monthly with the purpose of discussing those park and facilities as directed by the City Council. Staff is prepared to implement any one of these alternatives based upon the wishes of the City Council. Respect y~fff'~~m~tted, Rick Go~z~'~ Ccm_~ty Deve~nent Director Thomas L. Miller ,, Please deliver the following page(s) to: Name: Fax Number: .(.909) 477-~.A4~., From: ~HO~A.~ ,r,. MTT,?.I~R Date: ,TUN~ 18, ~997 Total number of pages, including cover PLEASE DELIVER iNNEDIATELY copying of ~h~s c~ni~lCion ~e str/o~ly ~=oh~iCed, If you have received ~hls co~unicaCion in e~r, pleaIt ~tify us ~edia~ely by Celephone and ~u~n ~he or/vinal ~ea~e co us a= =~e above address via United O~aCee postal So. Los. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES OR HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CADT, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. To r,i~a Phone No,,_ (909~ 6R.~,,-YP-63 _ _ ._ L. Mill., A IPlI(}IPp_~ilIONAL. L,.AW COl~f~Olt~l'lON IIC~'F C)P'fflCK BOX !i4~ trAC~IMII. C (GI, C)~} e83-3llO~ June 18, 1997 (g09) 477-2846 Jack Lamb, City Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Consideration of t~e vacation of a portion of Charles Smith Avenue, Parcel Map 15012 Dear Mr. Lamb: Please be advised this office represents Jim Post and Preferred Framing, Inc., who own the real property located at. 9233 Charles Smith Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Please be advised that my clients strongly and vehemently object to the vacation of Charles Smith Avenue since it ks their prime and only feasible access to Fourth Street and beyond. Without the direct access to Fourth Street, my ¢lient's property suffers a tremendous adverse impact causing it Co 4eelins in value. I just learned of the hearing regarding the proposed vacation on today's date. Otherwise, we would have objected to this proposed vacation long before now. It seems as though the City would have sought to notify all of the property owners and business owners along Charles Smith Avenue, of which my client is one, because of the direct impact to their property and business. My client located his business on Charles Smith Avenue in its present location because of the ease of access to Fo%~rth Street and beyond. Without that direct access, ingress and egress becomes ¢onvoluted and makes my clienC's property ex~creme%ydifficult to find. There is not only the issue of the loss of value of the subject property but the issues of good planning and circulation. You should not choose a large project over my client's right to access. In other words, it appears to me thaC the City is making a conscious decision that the other people on Charles Smith Avenue mean nothing so long as the City can geC the big development below my client's property. Please be advised that in the event that the vacation goes forward iC will relult in a taking without compensation of my client's property. An inverse condemnation action will be necessary because of the truendous harm and damage Chat the vacation will do to my client's property. JUNE 18, 1997 PAGE TWO I urge you to reconsider your course of action and not vacate Charles Smith Avenue. I think it ks e~remely important that while you may have a legal requirement to n~ify ~:hose people ~ha= are within 300 feet of t~he subJet= vacation you ShOUld do more when it is appropriate. It is important that all of the property owners along Charle~ Smith Avenue who pay =axes wiT/tin your district be notified of the vacation. You should have notified all of the proper~y owners along charles smith AVenue since there aren't many people to notify in the first place. Common decency dictates that if you arm ~oing =o ~a]~e someone's street so,ess away from them you at least give them notice of the public hearings in advance. Posting it In ~he newspaper naturally d~e no= notify anyone. While it may serve as the legal r~irement, you as public o££1uials and elec:e~ of£1c~a£s owe you~ constituents and tax paying public more than that. People deserve =o know when their prup~£~y rights are going :o me affected, and i= is a very small act when there is such a few number of property owners for you to notify all persons along Charles Smith Avenue. In une even= unat you are not of a mind to deny the vacation at tonight's meeting, I hereby request a oon~inuance of this vacation nearing so that t~e remainder of ~he prc}l~r~y owners along Charles Smith Avenue can be a~pris~ of ~m h~ring a~ have more than one day =o prepare for ~d givm input on su~ an importan~ item. ~ease uo no= put your ~ax paying residedleO and tax paying buminesses to the task of filing an invmrs~ condemnation action and/or an action for damages as a resul~ of'your hasty actions in vacating this valuable street to my clien~ and the other property owners along Charles Smith Avenue. Deny the vacation or delay action until my client and others can have proper input. If you have any questions, please feel free to call or write. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS L. MILLER A Professional Law Corporation By: ..... ~ ~-THOMAS L. MILLER TLM: lam ¢c: client JUt,-18-97 04'26P PREFERRED FRAMING 909 481 4779 P.01 ~ .... ~es~aentiel anO Commercial FAX COVER SHEET ~ # 501049 Fax (909) 48~-4779 Ph. (909)481-4774 DATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)' SUBJECT: COMMENTS' PLEASE CALL (909) 4.81-4774 IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION. 9233 Chades Smith Ave., Rancho Cucamcnga, CA 91730 Jun-18-97 04:26P PREFERRED FR,adVllNG 909 481 4779 P.02 referred Framing, Inc. Production At Its Best Res~detffial aria Commercial Lic # 501049 Pax (909) 481-4779 Ph. (909) 481.4774 June ! B, 1997 via facsimile- William Alexander Mayor & Head of City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Vacationing of Charles Smith Avenue City c. ol ~ocii Meeting on Jllne 18th. 1997 Dear Mr. Alexander:. We are writing ',o protest' the proposed vacation of a portion of Chades Smith Avenue. This action woutd adversely affect the current and future value of our property by limiting access to our property. We have been informed by a ,'~earby property owner, Mr. LairrJ, that he had a potential buyer of his property witharaw his offer when informed of the vacat!oning of Chades Smith Ave. A traffic hazard has already been created for my customers, my employees, and myself due to the access from 4th street to the 15 freeway. Additionally, by blocking off this area a graffiti billboard and crime area will be created along the high back walls of the car clealerships. This will act to further decrease the value of our property. It does nct appear that you are concemect with the safety and property values of the current residents. Also, notifying only the owners within a 300-.foot radius is not adequate. Common decency would require that all the owners on Chades Smith St,~eet be notified. !f the proposed resolutions are adcpted by the City Council, we fuily intend to take !egat action and will inctuc~e all parties involved - City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Count!, City Manager, City Engineer, ant the developer. Sincerely, PREFERRED FRAMING, INC. - /'/C.E.O. Thomas Miller, Attorney City Council members Bob Page, Dally Bulie~n Je~ Laird, prope,~ owner Bob Augur, property owner I'~sigr~ia Commercial Gp, property owner Doug O'Donne~l, 13ro13erty manager 9233 Charles Sm~tl~ Ave, Rancho Cucarnonga, CA 9! 730 ~8-97 04:24P PREFERRED FR~VI1NG 909 481 4779 P.02 ferred Framing, inc. Production At Its Best Residential and Comrne~"ial Lic # 501049 Fax (909) 481-4779 Ph. (909) 481-4774 June 18, 1997 via facsimil¢. William O'Neil City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Vacationing of Charles Smith Avenue City Co-ncil Meeting on .June 181h. 1997 Dear Mr. O'Neil: We are wdling Io protest' the proposed vacation of a portion of Charles Smith Avenue. This action would adversely affect the current and future value of our property by limiting access to our property. We have been informed by a nearby property owner, Mr. Laird, that he had a potential buyer of his property withdraw his offer when informed of lhe vacationing of Chades Smith Ave. A traffic hazard has already been created for my customers, my employees, and myself due to the access from 4th street to the 15 freeway. Additionally, by blocking off this area a graffiti billboard and crime area will be created along lhe high back walls iof the car dealerships. This will act to further decrease the value of our property. It does not appear that you are concemed with the safety and property values of the current residents. Also, nolifying only the owners within a 300-foot radius is not adequate. Common decency would require that all the owners on Chades Smith Street be notified. If the proposed resolutions are'adopted by the City Council, we fully intend to take legal action and will include all parties involved - City of Rancho Cucamonga. City Council, Cily Manager, City Engineer, and the developer. Sincerely, PREFERRED FRAMING, INC. ~--'-/,~mes E. Post C.E.O. CC: Thomas Miller, Attorney City Council members Bob Page, Daily Bulletin Jer~, Laird, property owner Bob Augur, property owner Insignia Commercial Gp, property owner Doug O'Donnell, property manager 9233 Charles Smith Ave,, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~.~ Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM F3. The attached page now becomes a substitution for pages 110 and 111 in your packet. Please replace the attached page for pages 110 and 111 in your agenda. io FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - CHAVIN DEVELOPMENT- A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Community Commercial land use designation of Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Brent Le Count, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Henry Chavin, Chavin Development, 8939 Vernon Avenue, Suite A, Montclair, thanked staff for the work it had done on processing the project. He believed the project will curb some of the problems in the area such as the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. John Mannedno, 9339 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he owns ~ acre of land to the west of the applicant's parcel. He asked if it was proposed that public storage be permitted only when mixed with office use. Chairman Barker stated the proposal is for office or retail uses to the front of the property with the storage to be tucked in behind and screened from view from Foothill Boulevard and the use must be in conjunction With mixed use and a master plan. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bethel noted approval would allow a difficult piece of property to be developed while retaining control by the City through the conditional use permit process. He supported the amendment. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed it is a particularly unfortunate site. He supported the proposal. Commissioner McNiel concurred. Commissioner Macias felt it is a good project. He said he was particularly impressed with the architecture and feels it is compatible with the historic structure located across the street. Chairman Barker cautioned the applicant to remember the comments made by the Design Review Committee with respect to traffic, design, etc. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 97-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NONE NONE - carried Planning Commission Minutes -6- May 14, 1997 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STt:~Ti:::- (DF::: G.~[LII:::ORNIl:~. on oath, that ,it 'is ~ bona fid.~.~nte,~ti,//~n ~ become a and ~ renounce forever all allegiance and .fidelity to all and any .foreign Pri.uce, P, te,tute, ,. State and A~ove~'ei.qnty ~hat8oever, and particularly to ..~._ ~..... ._ .~.. J Subscribed and swo~'n to before me this ..... ..~.. .....................day qf UNITED STATES OF St/tti::: (9i::: C:./:I:LII:::ORNI7~. ~o~uttl of ~n ~e~rtt~btno, ~t~te of on oath that ',t !,s ~ bona .fid~'(nt , Citizen o_-' :}e-:ni:eC S:a~.es o: _metlea and ~ renounce fore'yet all allegiance and .fidelity to all and any ~brei,qn PrS,ce, P. te.tate, ~ " ' J .~TATE OF CALIFORNIA, },. ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIINIO. ~ I, L. A. P~'EI~'I~ER, Cou~.ty .Clerk_ant~ ex-o~cio _Cl~rlc of the S,~q~et'ior Co~rt ,'said County, do'heveby certify the foregoing to be a full, ;.';. '.~., :. :.:.~.¢~ correct .,..~......~..............~ ~ ............... ..,~ .... ~._...~,...,~, :y..,, ...~..~... on . ,' ce, and th.at I have caref~tlly compared .said copy with the original. ...,5.4.~/~..~,.~.....~_ In Witness Whereof, I ha.e here.aito .set m..!Ahand and .~ - ~ , ., ~ ~ - _~ ~;~ ,-., - ~z ....... -. ~ ..~ .........................~s,~..~. -. . !--; ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ) ~ ........................... ~8-97 04:24P PREFERI{ED FRAMING 909 481 4219 P.U2 ferred Framing, Inc. Produc#on At Its Best Residentiet and Commercial ,, _ Lic # 501049 Fax (909) 481-4779 Ph. (909) 481.4774 June 18, 1997 via facsimile William O'Neil City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Vacationing of Charles Smilh Avenue City C.o~,ncil MeAting on .l~,ne 18th. 1997 Dear Mr. O'Neil: We are wriling Io prolest' the proposed vacation of a portion of Charles Smith Avenue. This action would adversely affect the current and future value of our property by limiting access to our pro13erty. We have been informed by a nearby property owner, Mr. Laird, that he had a potential buyer of his property withdraw his offer when informed of lhe vacationing of Charles Smith Ave. A Iraffic hazard has already been created for my customers, my employees, and myself due to the access from 4th street Io the 15 freeway. Additionally, by blocking off this area a graffiti billboard and crime area will be created along !he high back walls iof the car dealerships. This will act to furlher decrease the value of our property. It does not appear that you are concemed with the safely and properly values of the current residenls. Also, notifying only the owners within a 300-foot radius is nol adequale. Common decency would require that all the owners on Charles Smith Street be notified. If the proposed resolutions are,adopled by the City Council, we fully intend to take legal action and will include all parties involved - City o! Rancho Cucamonga, City Coundl, Cily Manager, City Engineer, and the developer. Sincerely, PREFERRED FRAMING, INC. CC; Thomas Miller, Attorney City Council members Bob Page, Daily Bulletin Jerry Laird, property owner Bob Augur, property owner Insignia Commerdal Gp, property owner Doug O'Donnell, property manager 9233 Charles Smith Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 16, 1997 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerl~ .--~//~ ADDITION OF EXHIBITS TO CITY COUNCIL PACKET - JUNE 18, 1997 Attached for your information are the exhibits to Staff Report under Council Business, No. 3- DISCUSSION ON DEVELOPME~ WITHIN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AREA I apologize for any inconvenience, however, the exhibits were inadvertently not submitted with the Staff Report. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 1997 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AREA RECOMMENDATION Provide staff with direction relative to Sphere of Influence issues. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This item is a follow-up from the City Council Workshop held on June 4, 1997, at which Mr. James Roddy, Executive Director of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) spoke regarding his agency's role and the City's Sphere of influence. A significant amount of information concerning LAFCO and the City's Sphere is contained in the attached copy of the City Council memorandum dated May 21, 1997. At Council's request staff contacted the County Planning Department and received a list of projects that are within the City's Sphere of Influence. This list is attached as Exhibit "B" for reference. CORRESPONDENCE None Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:LJH:taa Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - City Council Memorandum dated May 21, 1997 County Projects List DATE: May 21, 1997 CITY OF ,. 'RANCHO CUCA.MONGA MEMORANDUM TO: .~ May/et'and Members of City Council F R O.~.//~,/7 rad Buller, City Planner The following statements are in response to specific questions raised by Council Member Curatalo at the City Council Meeting of May 7, 1997, regarding annexation. 1. How does LAFCO determine areas of influence (sphere of influence)? A sphere of influence is "a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency." Section 56425 of the Government Code specifies factors that must be considered in determining the spheres of influence of each city and special district: The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open space lands. The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area. The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services which the agency provides or is authorized to provide. The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the Commission determines that they are relevant to the agency. . What does an adopted sphere of influence mean to us? The sphere of influence determines the area for which the City can expect to initiate or have a property owner initiate a request to annex into the city. The sphere may be annexed in total or incrementally at any time subject to the policies and determinations of both LAFCO and the City. In addition, under policy LU-9 (see attached excerpt copy of pages II-D-107 thru 110) of the County General Plan, development applications will be referred to the city for their review and comment. Furthermore, the County will consider the local agency development policies and standards before approving requests for development within the sphere of influence. MEMORANDUM TO RICK GOMEZ LAFCO ITEMS May 21, 1997 Page 2 3. Identify our sphere of influence. U m :E > z $ > N 4. What are some of the pros and cons of annexation? PROS CONS · Increases city land area and · population. · Comprehensive planning and coordination of infrastructure. Land use controls. Current property tax allocations of only approximately 4 percent place the City in an inequitable position from a cost versus revenue generation perspective. Places additional demands for facilities and services which if not carefully analyzed, will be a drain on the financial resources of the City. MEMORANDUM TO RICK GOMEZ LAFCO ITEMS May 21, 1997 Page 3 5. What is the effect of annexation on the City? Annexation simply adds jurisdictional control of area by the City, with corresponding responsibility for services. The financial frame work used to provide capital and operations and maintenance revenue is imperative in order to assure that any new development associated with annexation pays it own way without burdening the existing area. The City has processed five annexations of sphere territory, the last being in 1991. The City Council has formally adopted City policy relative to annexations within two resolutions. These two Resolutions (No. 89-568 and No. 91-155--see attached copies) sought the support of the San Bernardino County Supervisors. Neither Resolution was acted upon by the County Board. BB:LH:gs Attachments' Excerpt from San Bernardino County General Plan City Council Resolutions No.89-568 and No.91-155 SEC 77,0N II Planning Issues MAN. MADE RESOURCES l_~,nd Use/Grow",h Management iii. Intergovernmental Coordination There are over 250 units of Federal, State and local governments operating within the jurisdictional limits of the County. Coordination between all these agencies and aJl County departments is essential for the development and' implementation of the General Plan. Such coordination is particularly crucial to: Resolve potential land use conflicts between the County and'the Federal and Slate agencies, such as the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of the In- terior (DOI) which have jurisdictional control over the majority of land in the County. · The joint planning elforls of the County and the incorporaled cities, regarding land development policies in the Sphere ol Influence (SOl) areas. Other Jurisdictional Land All lands controlled by a jurisdiction olher than the County are coded to indicate the agencies that control them on the Official Land Use Oislricls map. This includes land controlled by the incorporated cilies, Federal agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Ihe Department ol Defense (DOD), and other State and public agencies. Federal land ownership is expected lo. ch'ange relatively little during lhe Plan period, allhough occasional land exchanges are anticipated especially bet'ween pdvate parties and [he Bureau oi Land Management (BLM) or lhe Nalional Forest. On lhe olher hand, incorporaled land area is expecled to increase due Io annexations and incorporations, lhereby reducing [he amounl ol land lhal is subjecl to the Counly's policies and regulations. Land Use Plann/ng In the Sphere of Influence (SO/) Areas The incorporated cilies are olten crilical ol lhe land use decisions made by the County in the sphere ol influence areas. The cities" major concerns are that: Some ol the land uses proposed by the County for lhe SOl areas are nol compatible with, and are nol logical exlensions ol the adjacent land uses within the cities' boundaries. Counly development standards are relatively lax, depreciating the quality ol t'he permitted development and adversely impacting the neighborhoods, including adjacent areas within the cities. 3. The review procedures employed by lhe County do not incl'ude urban design and architectural design considerations which are used by many cities. Section 65300 of the Calilornia Governmenl Code places a dual mandate on both cities and counties relating to land use planning within spheres ol influence. The land use policies adopted for the SOl areas are designed to encourage annexations or incorpora- tions. II-0-107 ..~an Sem,~,'~no CounOz GENERA L PLAN Adop{ed JUL Y Rew~ed December, D-59 D-60 D-61 D-52 LU-9 Goals Promote harmonious and mutually beneficial uses of land among the various public agencies and jurisdictions present in San Bernardino County. Promote closer coordination and cooperation among the County, the incorporated cities, SCA G, SANBA G, the various Special Districts and other local, State and Federal agencies (whose planning decisions and actions affect more than a single jurisdiction) to address regional problems such as traffic congestion, air quality, adequacy and quality of potable water, solid waste management, and preservation of open space. Encourage cities to annex urban unincorporated areas within designated city spheres ol influence and support annexations/incorporations of urban designated lands. Develop a policy which encourages implementation of compatible standards and facilities and encourage annexation for those lands located within the sphere of influence (SOl) o/ aft cities. Policies/A ctions Because State law gives cities Ihe ultimate responsibilily lo manage lands wilhin lheir adopted spheres of inlluence, and because cides are usually besl able to manage urban growlh [hrough the provision ot services,.lb.e County has a responsibility to coordinale ils land use policies with the cities. The County needs, lhedore, to pursue plans, policies and programs that support oily slandards and policies wherever such slandards have been agreed to and jointly adopied. Until joint plans have been adopied, the County will exercise ils aulhorily Io refer . c~,~.s and may require development [o conlorm to de,,,elo2menl applications lo a/lecled "'" oily development policies and standards ,,,,,henever appropriate. In addi',ion, the policies and standards that encourage annexation and the use ot city standards within city spheres ol influence will be considered: ao Adopt joint regulations/plans whenever possible through the adoption of overlay districts, specilic plans, zoning sludies, inlraslructure suppod plans, and olher appropriate mechanisms. · , · · Require Conditional Use Permits within city spheres ol inlluence Ior all develop- ment olher than single family residences, expansions of existing uses thai are less than 25%. C. Require service conneclions for projects that are less than one mile away lrom sewer availability· Exceptions (for package wastewater treatment plants, individ- ual on-site and multiple owner septic systems, holding tanks, and experimenlal systems) may be approved subject to review and approval by the County DEHS, the appropriate regional water quality control board, and the wastewater agency. 11-0.108 SEC TT©N II Planning Issues MAN. MA DE RESOURC ES Land Use/Growth Managemeni' LU. IO d. Support City annexations/incorporations of urban designated lands. e. Recognize and implement growth control limits adopted by cities as they apply to spheres. , f. Initiate Joint Power Agreements (JPAs) with cities to allow for city or County development fees to.be collected and distributed accordingly. Designate Improvement Levels and Land Use Map changes to more closely reflect city prepared general plans, pre-zoning and infrastructure and develop- ment standards for sphere areas. h. Designate Sphere of Inlluence areas on lhe Land Use Maps as Special Planning Areas and utilize special city standards in these areas to lhe extent they are incorporated in plans adopted as described in subpolicy (a), above. Because the County wants to minimize land use conllicls beb, veen the Counly and other agencies that have jurisdictional conIrol over lands Iocaled wiihin the County, and because the County wants ~o coopera~e and coordinate wiih adjacenl municipalities and olher regional agencies to address regional problems such as Iralfic congestion, air poilulion, waler quality, waste managemere and job/housing imbalance, Ihe lollowing policies/ac. tions shall be implemented: ! · a. Review the master plans and/or general plans ot all lhese agencies and incorpo- rate any and all policies [ha[ are applicable and appropriale inlo Ihe Counly General Plan. Solicil commen~s Irom the mililary and other Federal and Slale agencies [hal control land in the County on projec-'ls which are proposed within lheir designaled peripheral areas. Develop a procedure to assure that Ihe County, the incorporated cities. and the various special districts reler major planning and land use proposals Io all alt'ected jurisdictions lot review, comment and recommendation. do Establish a 'Review Area' around each state, military, or other Federal jurisdic- tion, and review development proposals or proposed General Plan amendments and revisions within the established Review Area with the appropriate agency. e, Work with the Bureau of Land Managemenl (BLM) and other public agencies to eliminate conflicts between public and private lands by reducing the checkerboard pattern ol public/private ownership. Work with BLM and the Forest Service to ensure that large blocks ot public land are not further subdivided or classtiled as Governmental Small Tracts. and to ensure that disposal ol public lands shall be based on definite proposals for development consistent with the County General Plan. I!. D- 109 San =~,rn,arc~no Courtly GENERAL PLAN Ad~pted JUL Y 1989 Revised December, lg.~O g, Work with BLM, the Forest Service and other public agencies to facilitate pub- lic_Jprivate land exchange to eliminate the need to cross public lands to reach privately owned lands. Such lands shall when exchanged be subject to all the policies and standards of 'Resource Conservation" (RC) District. However, it' such land is delermined by the Drainage Division of the County Land Management Department or by FEMA to be subject to severe flooding, it shall be subject to the policies and standards of the "Floodway* (F'W) District. A General Plan Amend- ment is required to determine the appropriate land use designation for exchanged lands. h. Work with BLM and other public agencies in the designalton and prolection wilderness and restricted nalural areas in the approval and managemere recreation evenls and sites; especially in the East Mojave Nailoriel Scenic Area (EMNSA). i. Work with Indian tribes and State and Federal agencies in the developmenl ol plans for land within lheir jurisdiction. j. Permit development adjacent to prisons and similar detention factlilies onty when compatible with the security needs ol the factlily and public salely is assured and: i) Work closely with Slate and local officials responsible for administering ihese lacililies when considering land bse proposals on adjacenl lands. it) Discourage high densily residenlial uses on adjacenl or nearby parcels. Requesl [hal SANBAG act as a forum Ior discussion ol lhe County's growth management plan and work [oward a consensus with all the cities lot ullimale adoption. Designate SAN BAG as the city/counly grow'th management torum concerning regional issues and conlinue working toward a consensus wilh surrounding counties through SCAG and SCAQMD. m. Continue to work on specific projects Io improve [ralfic Ilow, such as I~e Foothill Freeway exlension project, the Roule 91 Task Force, and Ihe Route 60171 working group. iv. Infillin~ Intilling can be a means of protecting and enhancing order neighborhoods. II is also a way of maximizing the utilization ol existing infrastructure facilities and ot saving energy; the assumptions being that urban services are readily available in infill areas and in add[lion, these areas are in close proximity to places ot employment. Intilling is an effective method of' preserving land, water and other natural and man-made resources. ' I/-D. 110 RESOLUTION NO. 89-568 ... A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE SUPPORT OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RELATIVE TO THE CITY ACTIONS TO ANNEX THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPHERE AREA WHEREAS, the City has always maintained that our sphere of influence is vital to the welfare of our community because of geographic location, .inter-connection of drainage, circulation, topography, environmental and service relationships; and WHEREAS, the City desires to foster the expeditions and logical annexation of said sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has expressed interest in fostering improved sub-regional and local cooperation in planning; and WHEREAS, the opportunities are now present to enable a coordinated approach to land use and development in the sphere; and WHEREAS, the City desires consistency in development patterns and regulations between the City's sphere of i.n..Fluence and the City; and WHEREAS, the City feels that the dichotomy between County and City develo~,ment regulations, policies, and standards encourages developers to play one against the other, therefore, frustrating any annexation attempts; and WHERE,.S, it is in the public interest to ensure environmentally, as well as economicall. y sound planning for the sphere of influence; and WHERE., the annexation of said sphere is a key factor to the successful moderation of density, use of compatible development standards, coordination of infrastructure facilities and ultimate development of the area. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows' · The City requests the cooperation and consent of the County in annexing all County-owned land within Rancho Cucamonga's sphere of influence; , The City requests the Board of Supervisor's support for the City's efforts to annex the remainder of its northern sphere; , The County grant to the City through a cooperative agreement review and processing of all planning and develo~ent proposals (with all requisite processing fees) within the sphere of influence, while having the County retain its approval authority; ,Resolution rio. 89-558 i ?age 2 4. The City urges the Board of Supervisors to adopt a position that all develo~ent within the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence be required to follow and adhere to all development standards and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 5. The Board of Supervisors consider a 90-120 day suspension of development applications in our sphere of influence to enable the proper planning and coordination of policies between the City and the County, and that a technical committee comprised of City and County staff be created to study same. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 1989. AYES: Alexander, 8uquet, Brown, Stout, Wright HOES: None ABSENT: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: o · De~bra J. Ada(~, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 28th day of November, 1989. Executed this 29th day of November, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. City Clerk /- RESOLIII~ONNO. 91-155 A RESOLIrg/ON OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC~K) ~, CAI~FORNIA, ~ %hqE SUPPOR~ OF THE SAN BERNARDINO CCLINTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~ TO THE WH]SLF3~, the City has always maintained that our Sphere-of-Influence is vital to the welfare of our ounnunity because of gecgra~c location, '~tar-co~ion of drainage, cLrculation, topcgraDhy, environ~_ntal and service relationships; and W]{EREAS, the City desLres to fcstar the expeditions and logical annexation of said Sphere-of-Influence; and WKEREAS, the San Bernardino County Bcard of Supervisors has expressed interest in fostering Jar~. roved sub-regional and lccal ccoperation in planning; W/~!REAS, the opportunities are not present to ep~b~e a coordinated approach to land use and develo.mment in the .Sphere; and W%[EREAS, the City desires consistency in developrent .mattarns and regulations between the City's Sphere-of-InfIuence and the City; and W'H~REA3, the City feels that the dichotc~ bet~'een County and City d_ _1ocr~_nt regulations policies and stardards encourages developers to play ~V~ . t ~ t one agahnst the other, therefore, frustrating any annexation attam?ts; ard ~K~-REEAS, it is in the public interest to ensure enviror~r, entally, as ,well as econ~--uically sourd planning for the .S~o_re-of-Lnfluer~e; and W]~qEAS, the annexation of said Sphere is a key factor to the Euccassful moderation of density, use of ~tible develo.n~ent standards, coord/nation of infrastructure facilities and ultirata developrent of the W/4EREAS, the city and the County Pave been working ~ the goal of excellence in plarm~ for the City's Sphere-of-Influence, as most recently demonstrmted by prepaI-ation of a City Etiwanda North Specific Plan and a County Etiwanda North Specific Plan. N~, ~RE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follc~m' 1. The City requests the ccoperation and consent of the County in annex~ all County-owned land within Rancho Cucamonga' s Sphere-of-Influence; 2. The City requests the Board of .Supervisor's suppo. rt for the City's efforts to annex the reTainder of its R~--$olution No. 91-155 Page 2 3. The County grant to the City, through a cooperative agreo_ment, review and prccessing of all plannirg and development proposals (with all requ/si~ prccessing fees) within the Sphere-of-Influence, while having the County retain its approval authority; 4. The City urges the Board of Supervisors to adopt a position that all development within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere-of-Influence be requested to follow and adhere to all development standards and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamo~a; and , 6. The Board of Supervisors consider a suspension of dev~l~nt approvals and process~ in the City's Sphere-of-Influence until the Cuunty' s Etiwanda · North Specific Plan is adopted. · .. PASSED, AP..oROVED, and ADO~ this 5th day of June, 1991. A~' Bu~uet, Stout, Williams, Wright ABSD~' None Denn/s L. Stout, Mayor ueu~ a J. A~ms, city Clerk Rasoluticn No. 91-155 Page 3 I, DEBRA J. ADA/4S, CITY CLzq~ of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said city Cour~il held on the 5th day of June, 1991. Executed this $th day of June, 1991 at Rancho Cucamong~, California. : _ J. , City Clerk · The foregoing instrument is a correct copy of the original on file in this office. ATTEST: ,~O/'/~c (',,, ,19¢,/ DEBRA J. ADAMS City Cle!k, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. t/ ' ! / DEPT. --* 98947"72~:~47 ~E)t ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO LANN!NC- DEPARTM= , T .......... · ,,,, ~t'~ i {'---~'~ PUBLIC SERVICES GROUP VALERY PfLMER Direclot of Planning 1550S Civic Drive o Victorville, CA 92392 · ($1e)243..8245 · Fa[ (819)243-8212 June 12, 1997 Mr. Larry Henderson, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RECEIVED JUN 1 $1997 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Status of San Bernardino County Projects in City of Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence Dear Larry: In response to your request for the status of projects in the City's sphere of influence, the following information is provided for two projects that were previously approved and have not expired and one that is currently being reviewed by staff. These three projects are the only projects that are pending with the City's sphere of influence. 1. Applicant: Ling Yen Mountain Temple Description: Conditional Use Permit to establish a Buddhist temple and retreat with offices, dormitories, worship center, kitchen facilities and 60 permanent staff on 41.5 acres. Location: Wardman Bullock Drive, east side; DeClift Drive, both sides Status: Application being reviewed 2, Ap.¢i~nt: r)~..~cription: Lowell Gomes Preliminary and Final Development Plan for 24 dwelling units and Tentative Tract for 24 lots and 6 lettered lots on 26.5 acres. Iocation; Jaybird Road and Haven Avenue, northwest corner Stab~s: JAMES J. HLAWEK Count,/ Adrr, in~$lcative Olflc,~r TI~.I KELLY Public Servlcc~J Or,up Board of Supervisor approval granted June 29, 1993. Issuance of Conditional approval withheld pending payment of processing fees. Planned Development and Tentative Tract expire June 29, 1998. Board of Supervisors KATHY A. [DAVIS ................ Flrsl Ol,ltrict DENNIS HANSBERGER ........ Th!t~ Distr:c: JON D. NIIKELS ............. Second Dlst. H. ct. LA~Y WALKER ............ Fourt~ Di~.trlct JERRY EAVE$ ................. Fifth Diatdct City of Rancho Cucamonga June 12, 1997 Page 2 3. A~.plicant: University/Crest Description: Preliminary Development Plan for 1237 residential units, commercial site, school site, parks and open space; two master tracts with two Final Development Plans on 1,111 acres. Iocation: Highland Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, northwest comer Status: Conditionally approved by Board of Supervisors June 24, 1991. Planned Development and subdivision maps expire March 25, 1998. If I can be of any further assistance in this matter please call me at (909) 387-4141. ~t~i~mardino County Planning Department cc: Judi Gilbert DATE: June 16, 1997 CITY OF RANCHO CUC;d~{ONOA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 18, 1997 Please refer to City Council Agenda, Item I. 2. Council Business: DISCUSSION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION As indicated in the Staff Report prepared by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, attached is the information that staff requested regarding use of historic preservation commissions. Thank you. /lds JUN--I~--gT FR I I 1 : ~2 CPF P. 01 FACSIMILETRANSMITTA L FORM Date: 13 June 1997 To: Larry. Henderson Company: City of Rm~cho Cucamonga Fax Number: 909/47%2847 From: Paiga.$. SwanIcy, Program Associate Number of pag~ (including cover sheet): $ Message: Thank you for your e-mail message the other day, and for your patienc~ in waiting for the li~t of California municipalities that have a preservation or design review commissio'n. Since the California Citie~ Database is a work in progress, I wtmte. d to take a few hours to make sure that the list I am sending you is current. If you have any questions about the list, or need assistance on any other matter, please do not hesitate to call. I will be out of th~ office all next week, but I would be happy to annwet any questions after I return. lf thert i~ a problem witlt thlt transmlttal, please call (510) 765.0972. Our Fag # is (510) 765.4724~ JUN-- P. 02 California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Preservation Foundation 13 · June · 1997 Municipality: Alameda County: Alameda County Presct~vation/Desi£n Review .. Commission: Alameda Historical Advisory Board Alameda County Alameda C~.lnty Alameda Co. Parks, Recreation & Historical Commission ._ Anaheim Orange County An~eim Heritage Council Auburn ._ Placer County Parks & Historic Restoration Comm, Azusa Los Angeles County Azusa Preservation Commission Bakersfield ... &era Uounty Bakersfield Historic Presexvatioa Comm. Berkeley Almuoda County Berkeley Landmarks F're.~ation Commission Blythe Riverside County Yes - name? Calaveras County Calavcras County Calaveras County Heritage Council Santa Clara County Carlsbad San Diego County Carlsbad Historic Preservation Commission Chub Vista San Diego County Historical Building Prese~,ation Commission Claremont Los Angeles County Claremont Amhitectural Conmxission Colusa Colusa County Heritage Presetration Committee Coronado ._ San Diego County Yes- n~mc? -. Covina - . Los Angol~ County Yes- name? Cupertino Santa Cica County -- · _ Cupeaino Planning Commission Danville · . Contra Costa County Heritage Resources Commission Davis . ._ Yolo County Solano County Historical Resources Management Comm. Dixon Yes - n,'une? JUN-- I ~--~7 ~F~ I I I : 35 CPF California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Preservation Foundation 13. June · 1997 Escoridido San Diego County Preservation/Design Review Commission: Escortdido Historic Pre~rvation Commission Fillmore Ventura County Fillmore Cultural Heritage Board Fontaria - . San Bernardino County Fontann Historic Preservation Commission Fort Bragg Mendocino County Fort Bragg Historic Landmarks Commission Fremont Alameda County · . . Historical/Architectural Review Board Fresno .. _ Fre, sno County Fresno Historic Prc~rvation Commission Fresno County Fresno County Fresno Co. Historical Landmarks Comm. Fullerton --. Onmge County' Fullerton Landmarks Commission Gilroy Santa Clara County Oilroy Historical Heritage Committee Glendale Los Angeles County Glendale Historic Pre.~rvation Commission Glendora Los Angeles County Glendora Historic Preservation Committee Glenn County Glenn County Olean Co. Landmar!~ Committee Half Moon Bay Mateo County Yes - name7 .-. Healdsburg Sonoma County Yes. name? Highland . . San Bernardino County Highland Pre~a'vation Commission Huntington Beach Orange County · _ Historical Resources Board - .. K~n County Kern County - . . Yes- name? La Habra Heights Orange County La Habra Heights Historic Commission La Mesa San Diego County _ . .. La Mesa Historic Preservation Cormnission _ ._ La Miraria Los Angeles County . _ - La Mirada Historical Heritage Commission California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Prese~'ation Foundation 13. $une · 1997 Municipality: ..... La Quints County; Riverside County Prqs.qrvation/Design Revte. w ,_.Cpmmis$i°n: Historical Preseawation Commission Larlcqput Marin County Larkspur Heritage Committee . . . Lassen County Lasscn County Lassca Co. He~'itage Commission Livermore AL'u'neda County Livermore Heritage Preservation Coinmission Long Beach Los Angeles Couaty Cultural Heritage Commission Los Altos Santa Clara County Los Altos Historical Commission Los Angel~ Los Angeles' County Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission Los Angeles County Los Angeles County L.A. Co. Historic Landmarks & Records Comm. Los Gatos Santa Clara County Historic Preservation Committ~ Mariposa County Mariposa County : Yes - name? Mendocino Mt.-mdocino County Mendocino/Ft. Bragg Historic R~vicw Board Mendocino County Mendocino County Mendociao Co. Historical Review Bd. Me'mad Merced County Yes - name? Milpitas Santa Cl,'u'a County Parks, Rec. & Cultural Resources Coinmission Modesto Stanislaus County · Modesto Landmarks Preservation Commission Monte Sereno Santa Clara County Monte Serene Sit~ & Architectural Committe~ · . . Monterey Monterey County . . Monterey Prc~rvation Comm. Monterey County Monterey Couaty ._ Monterey County R~sottree Board Morgan Hill Santa Clara County Morgan Hill Planning Commission Mountain View Santa Clara County --. Site Plan & Architectural Review Committee -..TUN-- 1 :~ --'E~'?' FR I 1 1 : ~; 4 C P F P. 05 California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Preservation Foundation 13 * June, 1997 Municipality:_ Napa _ _,County: Napa County Preservation/Design_ Review Na@a Cultural Heritage Commission Commission: Napa County Napa County Yes- National City San Diego County National City Historical Committee Needles San Bomardino County Needlea Cu!tural Resource Prcs. Comm. Nevada City Nevada County Yes - name? Nevada County Nevada Comity N~vada Co. Hist. Landmarks Comm. Newman Stanislaus County _ .. Historic Preservation Subcommitte~ Oakland Alameda County Landmarks Pr~sexvation Advisory Board Oceanside San Diego County Historic Preservation Advisory Commission Ventura County Ojai Cultural Heritage Board Ontario San Bernardino County Ontario Historic Preservation Commission Orango County Orange County Orang~ County Ristodcal Co~mnission Pacific Orov~ Monterey County Historic R~sources Review Committee Pahn Springs Riverside County Yes PaIo Alto .. Santa Clara.County ... Palo Alto CLO Pasadena Los Angeles County Cultural Hedtag~ Commission Petaluma Sonoma County Yes - nanae? Placentia - . Orange County City of Plac~ntia Historical Committce Placer County -. Placer County Placer County Historical Advisory Board Placecville El Dorado County Historical Advisory Committea JUN-- I ~; --'~ 7' FI~ T 1 I : ~ ~; C PI=' California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Preservation Foundation 13 * June · 1997 Municipality: Pomona County_: ~ ....... Los Angelcs County Preservation/Design Review . - . Ye~ - name? Commission: Portola Valley San Mateo County Portola Valley Historic Resources Committee Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County liistork: Preservation Commission Redlands San Bernardino County Historic & Scenic Preservation Comm. Redondo Beach Los Angeles County City of Redondo Beach Preservation COlmnission Redwood City San Mateo County Histode Resources Advisory Con~nittee · Riverside Riverside County Riverside County Riverside County Riverside Cultural Heritage Board Riverside County Historical Commission Sacramento $acramonto County San Andreas Calaveras County San Anselmo Marin County San Benito County San Benito County San Ctemente Orang~ County San Diego San Diego Count'v ........... · ,,, ~ . - San Diego County San Diego County San Francisco San Francisco County San Joaquin County - Santa Clara County · · - ~x t ~ ..... San Bcnito County Orange County San Joaquin County San Jose San Iuan Bautista - ~ ,. San Juan Capisuano Design Review/Preservation Board _,a ,i ........ s. - --' Yes Ye~ Ristodcal Heritage Advisory Committee &.M,. 1. t.,*s x s '~ '- · ' San Clem~nta Community I:)csign Comm. City of San Diego Historic Site Board County of San Diego Historic Sire Board Landmarks Preservation Advisory Bd. -i/ ....... S~ Joaquin County Historical Comm. -- · .i,- . ......... · . .. S,'m Jose Historic Landmarks Commission ................... Y~s ..... - - .. Cultural Hcfitag~ Commissioa JUN-- FR ! 1 ! : ~ 6 C::P F P. 0]' California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Preservation Foundation 13 · June · 1997 M,u nicipa!ity : San Lean&o County: Alameda County pr,es,ervation/Design Review, .~Cotntnission: Library-Historical Commission San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County - San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage Committee San Mateo County San Mateo County San Mateo County Historical Resom'ces Advisory Bom!d San R',ffael _ -. , Marin County Yes Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara Landmarks Cormn~ttee Santa Barbara County Santa Barbra County Historical Landmarian Advisory Committee Santa Clara Santa Clara County Santa Clara Landmarks Commission Santa Clara County Santa C 'lara County -- - Santa C ~lara Co. Histodcai I-~ritage Commission · $.~ta Cruz Santa Cruz County Historic Preservation Commission Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz County - . . County Historical Resources Commission Santa Monica Los Angeles Cottory Santa Monica Landmarks Commission Santa Paula Ventura County Yes - name? Santa Rosa Sonoma County Santa Rosa Cultural Hexitag~ Board Saratoga Santa Clara County Saratoga Herita~ Pm~:rvation Commission Sausalito Marin County Yes Sierra Madre · ._ Los Angeles County Cultu,al Heritage Commission Solano County Solano County Sonoma Sonoma County Sonoma Arch. Review Commission Sonoma County Soaoma County So~ma County Landmarks Commission South Pasadena Los Angeles County South Pasadena Cultural Heritage Commission California Municipalities with Preservation or Design Review Commissions California Pgservation Foundation 13 · June · 1997 Municipali_t~v_: ..... County: South San Francisco San Mateo County Pre_s¢,rvatio_n_/Desi~n Revifw. Commission: SSF Historical Preservation Commission Stockton San Joaquin County Stockton Cultural Hefituge Board · . Sunnyvale Santa Clara County Sunnyvale Heritage Preservation Commission Tiburon Marin County Tiburon Heritage & Arts Commission Trinity County Trinity County Yes - name? Tuolumne County Tuolumne County Tuolumne Co. Historic Preservation Review Commission Tustin Orange County Tustin Cultural Resources Advisory Comm. Vallejo Solano County Architectural Heritage & Landmarks Commission ... Ventura Ventura County Ventura Historic gre,~'vafion Commission Ventura County Ventura County Venttu'a Co. Cultural Heritage Bd. Visalia Tulare County Visalia Historic Preservation Advisory Board West Hollywood Los Angeles County West Hollywood Cultural Heritage Advisory Board ~ittier Los A~gclcs County Whittier Historic Preservation Commission Winters Yolo County Yes Woodland Yob County s _ ~'..a. rs. Woodland Historical Preservation Commission Yolo County Yolo County Yolo Co. Historical Advisory Conunitte~ . . Ymka $iskiyou County Yreka Historic & Landmarks Commission Yuba County Y uba County Yuba County Historical Commission