The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996/09/11 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 11, 1996 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker __ Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Bethel Commissioner Macias Commissioner Tolstoy ~ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 28, 1996 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-15 - TMP HOMES - The design review of detailed site plan and elevations for 42 single family lots within the southern portion of Tract 13566 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and vacation of a temporary access at the south end of the existing community trail, located south of 24th Street and west of the 1-15 Freeway - APN: 226-311-27 and 226-321-01. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-06 - DIVERSIFIED - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15730, an approved tentative tract map consisting of 28 lots on 5.66 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest comer of Beryl and Mignonette Streets - APN: 202-741-60 and 61. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS C. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS D. COMMERCIAL LAND USE STUDY DISCUSSION - (No report) VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning COmmission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an l l:OO p. m. adjournment time. lf items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a workshop immediately · following in the Rains Room regarding Pre-Application Review 96-04. I, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 5, 1996, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancbo Cucamonga. / Page 2 VICINITY MAP J I:':':':':':':': :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ,,,, ..................... ~ "-~.~ I I CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-15 - TMP HOMES - The design review of detailed site plan and elevations for 42 single family lots within the southern portion of Tentative Tract 13566 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and vacation of a temporan/access at the south end of the existing community trail, located south of 24th Street and west of the 1-15 Freeway -APN: 226-311-27 and 226o321-01. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of 3 percent from north to south. Tentative Tract 13566 was rough graded in the late 1980's but much of the grading work on the subject site has since been eroded. Directly to the north lie 112 single family homes in Tentative Tract 13566, to the south and west tie flood control facilities, and to the west lies vacant property. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tentative Tract 13566 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on July 22, 1987, as a 154 lot custom lot subdivision. Various developers have built tract-like homes on 112 of the lots leaving the remaining 42 lots in the current application. The applicant is proposing four floor plans each with three elevation styles. Added variety is provided by flipping/reversing footprints and providing a mix of front-on and side-on garages. The homes include traditional building materials (wood siding, brick, and stone veneer), porches, variety in roof lines, and architectural details consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan design standards. A mix of one- and two-story homes is proposed with home sizes ranging from 2,333 square feet to 3,298 square feet. Many of the homes will have a U-shaped footprint creating a semi-enclosed court yard area in the center of the "U." B. Desiqn Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the 'Design Review Committee (Barker, McNiel, Fong) on August 6, 1996, and the Committee recommended approval with conditions (Exhibit "G"). C. Technical and Gradinq Review Committees: The project was reviewed by both Committees and determined, with recommended conditions of approval, to be in conformance with applicable standards and ordinances. 1TEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 96-15 - TMP HOMES September 11, 1996 Page 2 D. Trails Advisory Committee: The tract is bordered on the east and south by a planned Community Trail. The Trails Advisory Committee (Tolstoy. Hahn, Coleman) reviewed the project on August 21, 1996, and recommended approval with conditions (Exhibit "H"). E. Vacation of Temporary Access Easement: A temporary access easement was dedicated to the City at the northeast corner of the subject property (Exhibit "1"). The easement allows maintenance vehicles to access the Community trail along the easterly property line and turn around. The improvement of the Community Trail fronting this project will make the tum-around easement unnecessary; therefore, a vacation will be processed upon acceptance of the Community Trail. FACTS FOR FINDING: The project is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Development Code, and the General Plan. This project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and Site Plan with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review 96-15 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" Grading Plan Exhibit "E" Typical Landscape Treatment Exhibit "F" Floor Plans & Elevations Exhibit "G" Design Review Committee Comments dated August 6, 1996 Exhibit "H" - Trails Advisory Committee Comments dated August 21, 1996 Exhibit "1" - Temporary Access Easement to be Vacated Resolution of Approval with Conditions · Sr!'E UTILIZATION PLAN TRACT NO. 13566 and 13566-2 ® ® ® ® ._ _~,~ t ~ _~ ~ ~ HOPPE ...... OnCE ~ I ~.z_:...::. :.:::: ~ ZZ' Z" PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN H~TINGTON II ........ ~ TM~ TR~C~ 1J566 & 13~6~2 "":".~'.7.:.~ ~,:~: .:":'~'~.';'.'T?'~' CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN DETAILED SITE PLAN 'TRACT NO, 1,,',.',.',.',.',.~66 end 13566-2 "~ PLAN 1 CO~Nm lO~r PLAN 4 s.~ ENTRY btlVEWAy HUNTINGTON II TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE TMRo~ .............................. Bedroom 3 ~-~-- - ~ Plan 1 Alternate Turn-In Garage 2,333 Sq. Ft. HUNTINGTON II COUNTY ESTATES - ~"~ ~ ' TURN IN GARAGE ~ .'..'~.' " ';~...~ ~ ] ~"~ ~' ~ ~ ~ Plan 1 CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL ~RA~HT-IN GARAGE HUNTINGTON II ICN ff..~-'~,' ' ' '~' REAR ELEVAT'ION ' ' ' LEFT ELEVATION r/' FRONT ,.'T '.,,.'".,.:' ~ :::::,.":':.:,~_ :::'._.':l: ........ "" ~ ........................... !~ .'-_:7.====- E:E __z:'.~'_.~ :: ......... ~ - . '* ._ _..,-;-~, ~ ~:,! ~,~,~:!~-::~_:,::_,::,:, . ~'_---~t~!: .............. ' ';~' ::';~' '~'~ _~ :~,,r'~ ~ ~i'F~ ti! :=='::, i~,i=:=,,'~.:,::,- ........ . .,.. , ..,.,,, .,., ,., ~)PARTIA,L COURT ELEVATION (~) PARTIAL COURT ELEVATION :: ..... ~""'~' ,'l. Plan 1 COUNTRY ESTATES HUNTINGTON II RIGHT ELEVATICN ,o~,,~:,,'<.~,",,L ..... REAR E~AT~ : ~-~ ........ : :~L";,:'::," ~' .... ~ ...... ~ ~:~.~'~='~ .......... LEFT ELEVA~ ~T ELEVA~ ......... ~,.,,; (~.FRONT FACE (~ PARTIAL COURT ELEVATION (~ pART1AL COURT ELEVATION ,~, v,',,o' "~'~""' ~' CALIFORNIA RANCH CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL TMP~o~ HUNTINGTON II Plan 2 2,496 Sq. Ft. TMP. o.. HUNTINGTON II ~u.~, E~TATES TUR.-,N GARAG~., ...4"f'% """' ~' CALIFORNIA RANCH TURN-IN GARAGE · ' ~.s.~.,~.' .....,~-" Plan 2 CALIFORNIA TRADITIONALSTRAiGHT-IN GARAGE TMP. o~ HUNTINGTON II .F:x~tlr .... . , RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVAT'K}N ,, ,, .. ~: .__,~ :~::'_:,:: _ . .:;.-.,--. .__ ,,_.=- :_, ,,: :.:::-=-_ :, . '~. LEFT ELEVA1]CN FRONT ELEVATION ..... OPTIONAL FIREPLACE , , , ,- ,.'."~ ELEVATION PARTIAL COURT ELEVATIONpAR]]AL COURT ELEVATION PARTIAL COJ~ ELEVATICN ...... ......."" """" ......... " Plan 2 COUNTRY ESTATES HUNTINGTON II ~- .._,o I~HT FLE~r~N ""t""o~'~""~"~'~''~'"''' REAR ~ATI~ LET EEVATI~ ~T ELEVA~ OPTI~FIR~L~ ' '~' ~' ~ " '~ ~EVAT~ P~TI~ ~ ELEVA~ P~ ~ &EVATI~ P~ ~RT &~ATION ......................................................................Plan 2 HUNTINGTON II --"~x I.EFr ELEVATICfi! ...... FRONT ELEVATION . - ...... :~_ :--- ~,, ,,., ........................ I ~ :; ::: ':2'~ "~.~': :'i; .... P~T~ ~T ELEVA) P~TI~ ~URT ~AT~ P~ ~RT ~VAT~ ;: :~'i::"', Plan 2 CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL TMP. o~ HUNTINGTON II ~/~ · '~/-~rr" """ ""° ,o Plan 4 3,265 Sq. Ft. TMP. o~ HUNTINGTON II __ Mstr Bath 1'J ~ ""'~' Plan 4 3,298 Sq. Ft. TMP. o~ HUNTINGTON II J~ ~[ ~' Z) /Z~ · .. ; ......... .' CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL~HT-IN GARAGE TM~o.~. ~TIN~TON TMP. o~ HUNTINGTON II · RIGHT ELEVATION - REAR ELEVATION '~' ~ O ~'°/,'~ LEFT ELEVATION FR~J4T ELEVATION~: ..................... Plan 4 ............................ CALIFORNIA RANCH TMP. o=~ HUNTINGTON II REIHT ELEVATION ...... REAR ELEVA~DN , LEFT ELEVA~ FReT ~AT~ :::::::::::~:~:'-~' ~ ..................... .......................... Plan 4 ............................................:; ............... CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL TMP. o.~ HUNTINGTON II 5-2o-~,~-,o ,~ ~ Master~,~l~droom ~>~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ' ,~ ..... q r ' z~ EEl ZZZZ] .-- / Plan 5 3,085 Sq. Ft, HUNTINGTON II COUNTRY ESTATES 'i'~RN-IN GARAGE CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL ~R~N G~GE Plan TMP. o... HUNTINGTON II f- ,,~ ,-/,/ .... . ,~ RIGHT ELEVATIONX-,,~ REAR ELEVATION -, ~ ~,~,1~1~ ~ ~-~ ~1-~~7 ~ ' ~ ~r:-,-'4.,~' '~ ~'" LEFT ELEVATION "" FR(DNT ELEVATION RIGHT CCXJRT ELEVATION FRONT COURT ELEVATI(3N LEFT COURT ELEVATION ;::;,:; 2:';',,::,:,.. ;; ;:;,';'Z',X/' :; ZZ,.Z:Z";;7;Z::. ............... ' ...............Plan B !E i,!:iE .:Z:.::i:: .....iE !:'{{!:L:L:::.:.:_"...-.': .....:: ::,::: '.:.:.:,' ...................::: .,-::: ::.'?:';,:', ..................X ;:',Z.':.;:'.Z_--",jZ' '.'.',2:L'~,L';,''Z, ................,: Z.,,':;jjZ COUNTRY ESTATES ',,; :~:;:',:::,:~:,;;:;E,;-::;~: .......... .......................... ,,::; ', TMP. o,~ HUNTINGTON II 20 RIGHT ELEVAT~'~ REAR ELEVATION EFT EL~A~ '~,:~.~, m~T ELEVATDN · ~.~ , , '~:,.~, - ~ .. L~T C~RT E~VATI~ '~ F~T ~URT ~AT~ ~T ~URT E~VATI~ ........................................................ ::=.:.: .........Plan 5 ::':':.:': ...........:::::::= .........:', '.~,'~'~:~ ~L'~:." ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ........... ................ :: :.:;::',~=:~'; ......... ~::::', ..... :L,T.:*". ......... :: :.;: :::.7~ CALIFORNIA RANCH RIGHT ELEVAtiON FEAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION .... .~ ~- F~ ELEVAT~ LEFT C~T ELEVATI~ ~T ~RT ELEVA~ RGHT ~T ELEVA~ .................................................................Plan 5 ..~.:':,:~:',,.~:~:~:~:~=,~-~.~':~'~'~, :: :::::L;;2::,~: .....:.::::;,~:-':-':;; ............ CALIFORNIA TRADITIONAL :: ............................... . .......... ........... :::: :':;::L ............... . ........... TMP. o.~ HUNTINGTON II LEFT ~'IEVATION / FRONT ELEVATION "' ................... '= ...................Plan 5 , .'~"-E:~ ...... couNT.Y ESTATSS TMP. o. Es HUNTINGTON II ·~ , .... RIGHT ELEVATICN .~ e~ REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION .......................... i ii' i:iiii .ii:i.': ;:::; ~:;:;;':~:!:':!::':"F,~:-5:.7: :'Z Z':. . ........................""-::;'::' ..................Plan 5 ".~"'ZZ ..... CALIFOI~NIA TRADITIONAL TMP. o.~ HUNTINGTON II ~-)~t3t'r .~ .4 ..... DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:10 p.m. Brent LeCount August 6, 1996 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-15 - TPM HOMES - The design review of detailed site plan and elevations for 42 single family lots within the southern portion of Tract 13566 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specilic Plan, located south of 24th Street and west of the 1-15 Freeway - APN: 226-311-27 and 226-321-01. Staff Comments: Oral report will be presented at the meeting. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Dave Barker, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Brent LeCount The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the application subject to the following conditions: 1. Consider providing roll-up garage doors matching the appearance of the proposed design as an option for future home buyers 2. Provide automatic garage door openers for all homes. 3. Provide a minimum 1-foot offset in connecting walls between homes with color change at interior comer of offset. 4. Provide black spark arresters for chimneys. 5. Addition of a fourth car garage space for Plan 5 homt;s shall be subject to staff review and approval prior to issuance of building penits. The fourth car garage space shall be setback from the front of the home to provide variety and visual interest and shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET August 21, 1996 II. NEW BUSINESS A. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-15 - TMP HOMES - A request to provide community trait improvements for the completion of Tracts 13566 and. 13566-2. Backqround: In 1987, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 13566 for development of a 154-home subdivision on 68 acres of land. A condition of approval required that Community Equestrian Trails be provided along the north, south, and east boundaries of the tract with precise trail alignment subject to review and approval by the Trails Advisory Committee pdor to recordation of the Final Tract Map. The applicant, TMP Homes, is proposing to build homes on the remaining 49 lots located at the south end of the tract. The Final Map for these lots has not yet been recorded. ,Context: Community Trails have been constructed along the north and a portion of the east boundaries of the tract. The curTent proposal would extend the existing Community Trail along the east side of the tract (actually within San Bernardino County Flood Control right-of-way) to wrap around and through the southerly portion of the tract (see attached site plan). Analvsis: The proposed trails are consistent with the approved tentative tract map and with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Community Trail requirements. However, the Trail Implementation Plan requires Community Trails to be a minimum of 20 feet in width while the applicant is proposing 12-foot and 16-foot wide trails. Staff recommends that Community Trails within the Flood Control right-of-way be widened to 20 feet. Also, since tentative map approval and rough grading, the Etiwanda Specific has been amended to require a 106 foot wide right of way for Wardman Bullock Road (see Exhibit "B"). However, the road has been rough graded to respect a 104 foot right of way and the applicant wishes not to regrade to accommodate the 106 foot width. The two foot difference in right of way widths is proposed to be taken from the required 3 foot wide landscape strip between the community trail and the edge of the right of way/property line wall leaving a one foot wide landscape strip. Staff is of the opinion that this would not provide sufficient distance/buffering from property line walls for users of the trail and recommends that the project comply with the Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements. There is a triangular piece of Flood Control District right-of-way adjacent to the southeast corner of the site which could provide an opportunity for a trail rest area. This area is not large enough to function as a trail head with space for horse trails; however, it could accommodate hitching posts and shade trees. Staff recommends that the applicant and the Trails Advisory Committee discuss this opportunity and that the Committee provide the applicant with direction as to rest area design. Staff Planner: Brent Le Count ACTION: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide full 106-foot right-of-way for Wardman Bullock Road per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Off-site Community Trails shall have a minimum width of 20 feet per City standard. 3. Provide trail rest stop within the triangular piece of Flood Control District right-of-way at the southeast comer of the site north or Wardman Bullock Road. Amenities shall include, at a minimum, hitching posts, benches, horse watering fixtures, and shade trees. Ill. COMMITTEE BUSINESS The Committee recommended that an active equestrian, who is familiar with the existing trail system, be appointed to the Committee. IV. ADJOURNMENT The Trails Advisory Committee adjourned at 4:30 p.m. ..' T'UR,~,J ARounD g.~51~ M, ENT coF--~. DE'rAIL BELOW BO NDARY~~ I" ' "NAI~Df'IAN ...... BLLLC:~K ~ //, ' u I ,~ ~ / ~ ~' '~x~ I I [ ,7 ~,, / · L ~.~' OIT~ 0~ ff~M: ~seme~t to ~NCH0 CUC~0NGA Vacate ~NG~E~ING D~SION T~LE: DR 96-15 E~IT: "I" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 96-15 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566, LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET, WEST OF THE 1-15 FREEWAY IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 226-311-27 AND 226-321-01. A. Recitals. 1. TMP Homes has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 96-15, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 1 lth day of September 1996. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on September 11, 1996, including written and oral staff repods, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto. will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. e. The vacation of the temporary access turn-around as reserved by recorded document Number 93-241553 is consistent with the General Plan. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 96-15 - TMP HOMES September 11, 1996 Page 2 Plannina Division 1) Relocate the block wall proposed for Lot 10 of Tentative Tract 13566-2 to respect the required 25-foot minimurn front setback. 2) Flip the footprint for the home plotted on Lot 11 of Tentative Tract 13566-2 so that the driveway is on the east side of the lot. 3) Provide a minimum 1-foot offset in connecting walls between homes with color change at interior corner of offset. 4) Provide automatic garage door opener.,; for all homes. 5) Provide black spark arresters for chimneys. 6) Addition Of a fourth car garage space for Plan 5 homes shall be subject to staff review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. The fourth car garage space shall be set back from the front of the home to provide variety and visual interest and shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements. 7) Community Trails within Flood Control District right-of-way shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width per the Trails Implementation Plan. 8) Provide equestrian amenities including, at a minimum, hitchin9 posts, horse watering fixtures, shade trees, landscaping, and benches in the triangular podion of Flood Control District right-of-way adjacent to the southeast corner of the site to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. These improvements are subject to approval by the County Flood Control District and contingent upon fulfillment of the Land Exchange Agreement with the District as required by the City Engineer. 9) Any off-site easements required from ths County Flood Control District shall be obtained prior to recordation of the final map. 10) Community equestrian trails and amenities shall be constructed and improved at the time of street construction. 11) The boundary/flood wall along the west property line shall be constn~cted with decorative materials and shall be no higher than 6 feet (or 8 feet if combination retaining wallffence wall is needed), to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 12) Any off-site slopes associated with the project shall be landscaped for erosion control and a temporary irrigation system installed and maintained by the developer for a period of at least six months. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan for these slopes shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of any permits. J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 96-15 - TMP HOMES September 11, 1996 Page 3 13) Entry monumentation on Bullock Place just north of Wardman Bullock Road shall match the design and appearance of the existing monumentafion on San Sevaine Road at 24th Street. 14) Street names shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to recordation of the Final Tract Map. Names shall continue the use of histodc names. 15) All pertinent conditions of approval related to Tentative Tract 13566 shall apply. Enoineering Division 1) All pertinent conditions of approval related to Tentative Tract 13566 shall apply. 2) The flood wall along the west tract boundary south of Hickcox Lane shall be constructed/reconstructed as required by the City Engineer. 3) Construction of the streets shall occur as follows: Tentative Tract 13566 shall construct Henderson Drive, connecting to San Sevaine Road and Johnston Place and Bullock Place down to Wardman Bullock Road. Tentative Tact 13566-2 shall construct Henderson Drive, Bullock Place, Hoppe drive, Stephens Place. and Wardman Bullock Road within the subdivision boundaries full width. 4) Fulfillment of the Land Exchange Agreement with San Bemardino County Flood Control District shall be completed, prior to final map recordation as required by the City Engineer. 5) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimate cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation. 6) Corner properly line cut-offs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 7) Wardman Bullock Road shall conform to the Etiwanda Specific Plan, including any amendments which may occur. prior to final approval of the improvement plans. 8) The triangular podion of land fronting the nodh side of Wardman Bullock Road at the easterly property line of the proposed tract, acquired as pad of the land exchange, shall be landscaped as a trail node to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Planner. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 96-15 - TMP HOMES September 11, 1996 Page 4 BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATrEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the ;I lth day of September 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: Development Review 96-15 SUBJECT: Development Review for Tentative Tracts 13566 and 13566-2 APPLICANT: TMP Homes LOCATION: South of 24th Street, West of I-15 Freeway ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Time Limits completion Date 1. Approval shall expire. unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Pdor to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved. wdtten certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations. extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program. and grading on file in the Planning Division. the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Project NO. DR 96-15 Completion Date 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls. berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 8. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices. in conjunction with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., pdvate equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement; however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence mated~ll. b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance may be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. c. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official. 9. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&R's. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable! to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting. phone listing for community concerns. hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 12. Six foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along tht; project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good f-.=~ith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplantin9, and trimming methods. 3. All private slopes in 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-cjallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and apprepdate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Plannin9 Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas. the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. D. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Project NO DR 96-15 Coml31etion Date APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: E. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code!, and all other applicable codes, ordinances. and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Buildin9 and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beauti~cation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. F. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geologicel report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CON-~;TRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello-Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be 1.500 gallons per minute. a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance. an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Project No. DR 96-I 5 Completion Date 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed. flushed and operabie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. 7. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways. 8. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 9. Plan check fees in the amount of $ 0 have been paid. An additional $125.00 shall be paid: X Prior to water plan approval. X Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 10. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. 11. With the home located above Hillside Road, it shall comply to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Standards for a high fire hazard zone. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 11, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-06 - DIVERSIFIED - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15730, an approved tentative tract map consisting of 28 lots on 5.66 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Beryl and Mignonette Streets - APN: 202-741-60 and 61. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is vacant bordered on the north, west, and south by existing single family homes. Property to the east (across Beryl Street) is currently occupied by the Alta Loma School District as a maintenance yard, but is zoned residential. Code Enforcement has been working with the School District on relocation efforts. Tentative Tract 15730 was approved for this property on July 24, 1996. The site slopes from north to south at roughly 3 percent. Various slope and wall conditions exist along the projecrs northerly property line. There are also four mature Eucalyptus trees along the Beryl Street frontage that have been approved for removal under the Tree Removal Permit approved with Tentative Tract 15730. ANALYSIS: A. General: This subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission of July 24, 1996. The proposed residences vary in size from 1,208 to 1 ]14 square feet on lots that vary in size from 6,011 to 8,467 square feet. Four floor plans are proposed and all have two-car garages that face the street. The two smallest plans are one-story. A majority of the lots have been plotted with the two one-story model types. Wherever possible, the northerly lots have been plotted with one-story homes in order to be sensitive to the yiewsheds and privacy of the residents to the north of the site, all of which reside in one-story homes. The proposed architectural treatments, wall designs, and other design elements have been designed to be compatible and compliment existing development in the area. The project is proposed to have a modified parkway section where the back of sidewalk is proposed to be only 9 feet behind the curb face. as opposed to the normal 12 feet on a local street section. The modified street section is proposed in order to provide the required minimum depth of 18 feet on all private driveways. This concept has been found to be acceptable by City staff. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 96-06 - DIVERSIFIED September 11, 1996 Page 2 B. Desion Review Committee: On August 6, 1996, the Committee (Barker, McNiel, Fon9) reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to conditions contained in the attached Design Review Committee action comments (Exhibit "G") and incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval. C. Neiqhborhood Meetings: Since this project does not require a public hearing, the design of the proposed residences was reviewed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision at neighborhood meetings on November 21, 1995 and February 20, 1996. The subdivision layout and architectural concepts were generally supported by residents of the area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 96-06 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. City Planner BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Typical Sections Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Design Review Committee .Action Comments dated August 6, 1996 Resolution of Approval with Conditions EXHIBII_A SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ....... ...~ .....~' ' ' ~ ' Detafied S~te Plan }22 / ~' ' ' ' ~ ' ' n~v~s~,~o ~,~c~,cTract No. 15730 - Mignonette St ~ .................. "":':~ -, - " .::"--'.'2 DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 '~?z2~/P/~ "~' Mignonette St R,,~c,oc.c,mong~.c~,,,o..,~,,,,oRancho Cucamonga CA"""""" :':"":""":":'::"':' (9091 4~1-1150 ~e' ~' TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15730 2:1 Landscaped Slope r- "B" Court 6' Masonry Wall Lot 11 Existing Wall Pad Elev. 1512.9 Lot 40 Tr. ~ ' Pad r~ 2:1 Landscaped Slope 6' Masonry WaR "D" Court Lot 48 Tr, 6846 Lot 25 Pad Elev. 1520.5 Pad Elev. 1516.3 DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 .,0.o co..me,c. c..t., D,,,e. su,,. ,ooMignonette St. 101D Front 101E Front DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC ~/Tt-P,4,~'~ LTD. Tract No. 15 7 3 0 Mignonette St. 10190 Commerce Center Drive, Suite 200 ,,o,, ,,,.,,soRancho Cucamonga, CA. r'r~ ' ear ':" !' ' ' ' ~ i" ' . 01c Right DIVliRSIFII!D PACIFICTract No. 15730 .--~/7t-~d-/~ L,o.Mignonette St ..... ~nc..o C.camo.g.. C~,,'o.,,,~ 91,30RanChO Cucamonga CA"""".':' ............ 102E Front DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 ,o,9o Comma,c, c,,,,, D,,,e. su,,e ,ooMignonette St.:' ': '. ':':':.': ": ~o ~..~o~. ~,,,o~.,. ,, ,,oRancho Cucamonga, CA.:: ':' """' "' :' "':""' "'' I02C I.el~ "" 102C ""' Rear 102C Right DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 ,o,,o co~..,.,~e c..,., D,,.e. su,,e ,ooMignonette St ............ Rancho Cucamonga CA :"""~"""""~'~': I 02C L e fi, 102C Rear __ 102C I~,ight DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 ,0,~0 co.~,,e,~e C,n~e. o.,. su,,e ,®Mignonette St ..... _ Front Front 103E Front DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 ---/x/t'P,,P/~; ,o,~o co,,,.,~,~, c,,,,, o,,e, s.,,~ 200Mignonette St........ :....... ,.:'.:,: ,.: .,..: .~.~,,o ~..,o,.. ~,,,o..,~ ~,.oRancho Cucamonga, CA.::.: '.'. :::;,'.....:.::::i..-.:..::. :!::: .... (909) 481.11SO V 103C · '. .:~ Lelt 103C Rear 103C Right o,vE~S,F,EO P~,C,F,CTract No. 15730 '~'t'P/P/~;LT°' Mig St Rancho Cucamonga CA ::':""""":"':: ":' ~ Front Front 104E Front DIVERSIFIliO PACIFICTract No. 15730 Mignonette St 10390 Commerce Center Drive, Suite 200 R,cho cuca,.o.,g.,. c~,,,o.n,,9, ,,oRh Cg CA:' :" ~9o9~48,-i,so ant 0 HCa~O~ a~ . ~*'%-'~ ":,: .:. Left ] 04C Rear 104C Right DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC Tract No. 15730 --zf~,,F~ LTo. Mignonette St. .. ,,,,. ..... .......... 10390 Cornrwerce Center Drive, Suite 200 ~ ~ ........ ,~..,,.o~,.o.~.~,,o,.,,~.,,o Rancho Cucamonga, CA. (9091 481-1150 ' ~, ::':""~'Z'ZT:"";~:~':::'~::~::::' " ;' G G Plan 101 Plan 102 1208 s.f. 1353 s.f. _ DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 ~z'/~/t't'~""~=~ig .... ; LTD. M nonette St. Ra.c.o cu%%~%ai.,~,s?,n,a,, ,,oRancho Cucamonga, CA.'-. "= .........:,::¢::. ,.. ~,.. '==~ I~Bi I'-"] 1593s.f. ~ ................ / ~ E.' ......... I ...............................I Lower Level Upper Level DIVERSIFIED PACIFICTract No. 15730 P~rch at 104C and IO4D Lower Level Upper Level DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC Tract No. 15730 .471'p,,g~ ~TD. Mignonette St. 10390 Commerce Center Drive, Suite 200 .a.c.o cucamo.g.. Ca,,,o.n,~ 9, ,,oRancho Cucamonga, (909} 4~1.1150 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Steve Hayes August 6, 1996 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-06 - DIVERSIFIED - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for an approved tentative tract map TT 15730 consisting of 28 lots on 5.66 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling traits per acre) located at the northwest comer of Beryl and Mignonette Streets - APN: 202-741-60 and 61. Design Parameters: The vacant site is bounded by single family residential development to the north, south and west. To the east, across Beryl Street, is a vacant parcel zoned for single family residential development. Four mature Eucalyptus trees exist along the frontage of Beryl Street and were recommended for removal with replacement planting by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the Tentative Tract Map. Agate Street exists as a north/south stub street off the main east/west spine street, Hamilton Street, within the residential development north of the site. A fairly significant slope has been created along the northern property boundat)' of the site With development of the homes to the north. The site slopes from north to south at roughly 4 percent. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. A total of four models with three elevations each are proposed for this 28 lot subdivision. However, 12 of the 28 lots are plotted with the Plan 102 model, which is the larger one story home and the model with the largest footprint. Staff has been attempting to work with the applicant to resolve a technical concem regarding sufficient ckiveway depth and flat rear yard area for all lots. As currently plotted, there are 12 lots where this technical issue exists. Staff does not object to the large number of one-story homes within the project (18 out of 28 lots), but fewer Plan 102 models would provide more unit variety and possibly solve: the technical concems of staff if smaller footprints are plotted on some of the more difficult lots. The Plan 101 is 3 feet less in depth than the Plan 102. Therefore, staff would recommend that more Plan 101 models be plotted in place of some Plan 102 models in situations where suffmient driveway and rear yard depth are a technical concern. Also, in some project interior cases where having a two-story home plotted would not significantly impact the surrounding neighborhood, the Plan 103 or 104 models could be plotted to resolve staff concems. These models are over 12 fleet less in depth than the Plan 102. 2. The applicant is proposing to use horizontal woodcrete fencing with river rock pilasters along the Beryl Street frontage. The project to the south, Hamilton Ranch, has vertical wood fencing with river rock pilasters along Beryl Street. Staff feels that the use of woodcrete with river rock pilasters is acceptable, however, a vertical type of woodcrete is preferred to be more consistent with the project to the south. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Several units should be flipped to more closely align driveways and garages and provide larger open yard spaces between units. 2. Driveway approach widths should be minimized as much as possible, especially given the nature of the specific subdivision design where a large number of lots front on to the cul-de-sac bulbs. DRC AGENDA DR 96-06 - DIVERSIFIED August 6, 1996 Page 2 3. Special paving should be introduced in driveways given the potential domination of the streetscape the driveways may have in the proposed cul-de-sac scheme. 4. In order to insure a consistent landscape along Mignonette sh'eet, the slope planting scheme should be expanded to include the entire slopes. 5. Wood sided chinracy stacks should be modified in design. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The proposed river rock pilasters should be composed of a native river rock material and have a decorative cap treatment, preferably consistent with the cap used on the pilasters for the Hamilton Ranch project to the south. 2. Return walls should be composed of a decorative block or have a decorative exq. erior treatment and cap. Wood fences should be limited to interior side and rear yard area not seen from public streets. 3. A minimum of 5 feet should be provided between walls and the back of sidewalk in order to provide a landscape area of sufficient width to support the growth of trees. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the incorporation of the design items mentioned in this report as well as any other conditions the committee deems necessary. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Dave Barker, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant should explore the possibility of using vertical spans ofwoodcrete fencing instead of the horizontal woodcrete fencing proposed. 2. Units should be flipped to more closely align driveways and garages and provide larger open space areas, to the satisfaction of staff. 3. All other secondary and policy design issues should be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Planner and ~vill be incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for the project. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15730 (DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-06), THE DESIGN REVIEW OF THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR AN APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 28 LOTS ON 5.66 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BERYL AND MIGNONETTE STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-741-60 AND 61. A. Recitals. 1. Diversified Pacific Homes, Ud. has filed an application for the Design Review of Tentative Tract No. 15730, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 1 lth day of September 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced meeting on September 11, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and even/condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 96-06 FOR TT 15730 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC HOMES, LTD. September 11, 1996 Page 2 plannino Division 1) The unit on Lot 11 shall be flipped to more closely align driveways and garages and provide larger open space areas, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2) Special paving or treatments shall be introduced in driveways, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) The slope planting areas shall be expanded to include the entire slope areas adjacent to Mignonette Street, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4) The wood chimney stacks shall be modified in design, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) The pilasters on the perimeter walls shall consist of a real dver rock exterior finish and have a decorative cap treatment, consistent with the cap used on the Hamilton Ranch project to the south, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6) Retum walls and other walls exposed to public view shall be composed of a decorative block matedal or have a decorative exterior treatment and cap, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7) A minimum of 5 feet shall be provided between walls and the back of sidewalk in order to provide a landscape area of sufficient width to support the growth of trees, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8) Aft applicable conditions from the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 15730 shall apply to this project. Engineerino Division 1 ) All applicable conditions from the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 15730 shall apply to this project. 2) Within the cul-de-sac locations, the back of sidewalk (4 feet wide) shall be located at 9 feet from face of curb and shall be constructed pursuant to City approved drawings, standards, and specifications all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certi~y the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 96-06 FOR TT 15730 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC HOMES, LTD. September 11, 1996 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11 th day of September 1996 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: Development Review 96-06 SUBJECT: Desicln Review of an approved 28 lot subdivision APPLICANT: Diversified Pacific Homes, Ltd. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Beryl and Miclnonette Streets ALL OF THE F. OLFOWIN_G~,N_._D,I_T,I~O. NS APPLY 770 YOUR PRpJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits Completion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not __ issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, __ __/__ the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the prpject site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project. this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuanct; of building permits when no map is __ __/__ involved. written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must tlave been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 1 Project No. DR g6-06 Completion Date Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance, 5. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc.. shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, herruing, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, includin9 proper illumination. 9. All parkways, open areas. and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City, Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 11. Six foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existin9 walls/fences along the project's perimeter. C. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. sc -~ 2 Project NO. DR 96-06 Completion Date D. Landscaping 1, A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in this case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes in 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. A~~pdvates~~pesinexcess~f5faet'but~essthan8feetinvertica~heightand~f2:1~rgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15--gallon or larger s~ze tree per each 150 sq. ~. of slope area, 1 ~allon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and apprepHate grc,und cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5--gatlon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 6.Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. E. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wdtten inotice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to deterr'nine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting, The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review 4nd approval prior to the issuance of building permits, Project No. DR 96-06 Completion Date ~.PPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR 3MPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code. Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee. Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official. after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2.A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello RoDs Community Facilities Distdct requirements shall apply to this project. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be 2,000 gallons per minute. a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Project No, DR 96-06 Completion Date 4, Pdor to the issuance of building permits for combustible conatruction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 5. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: X Other: NFPA 13-D r~qUir~d in lien of secondary access. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 6. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards. as noted: X All roadways. Plan check fees in the amount of $ 0 have been paid. An additional $. 125.00 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 7. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. K. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame OF track in any manner. L. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color' and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF ltF, PORT DATE: September 11, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND.: All terms for the Trails Advisory Committee members have expired with the exception of Bruce Ann Hahn. Therefore, the Planning Commission needs to reappoint or make new appointments. The Committee meets once a month, as needed, usually on the third Wednesday of the month at 3:30 p.m. Staff contacted Gregory Pilcher, Equestrian Member-At-Large. Mr. Pilcher declined serving another term. Staff also contacted Suzanne Chitlea, former Planning Commissioner and Trails Committee Member. She, too, declined to serve on the Committee. Paul Senif, Bicycling Member- At-Large, is interested in being reappointed to serve another term. In the past, the Planning Commission has solicited applications and used a subcommittee to conduct interviews. The Subcommittee would forward a recommendation to the Planning Commission for consideration. Staff has requested that the Parks and Recreation Commission also update their appointments to the Trails Advisory Committee. CURRENT MEMBERSHIP: For your information, the current Trails Advisory Committee appointments are listed below (Those whose terms have expired are typed in boldface): Began Servinq Appointment David Barker December 8, 1993 Planning Commission Peter Tolstoy November 12, 1986 Planning Commission Alternate (Vacant) Planning Commission Bruce Ann Hahn December 16, 1993 Parks and Recreation Commission Massie Hazegh July 20, 1995 Parks and Recreation Commission Mark Whitehead (Alternate) July 16, 1988 Parks and Recreation Commission Gregory Pilcher April 26, 1989 Equestrian Member-At-Large * Paul Senft July 24, 1991 Bicycling Member-At-Large * · Appointed by Planning Commission ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS September 11, 1996 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following three actions: 1. Appoint Commission representatives to the Trails Advisory Committee, one for a term to expire in July 1997 and other to expire in July 1998. 2. Reappoint Paul Sen~ as Bicycling Member-At-Large for term expiring July 1998. 3. Direct staff to issue a press release and contact thE! three equestrian organizations and the Police Equestrian Patrol to solicit applicants to fill the Equestrian Member-At-Large seat. City Planner BB:DC/jfs