HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/10/03 - Agenda Packet CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
IsT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
OCTOBER 3, 2001
A_qencv, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ............................... Member
Grace Curatalo ......................... Member
Bob Dutton .............................. Member
Jack Lam .........................City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane
Curatalo Dutton__., and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Recognition of Alta Loma High School and their efforts to provide
facilities for community programming.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/12/01 and 9/19/01 and Payroll
ending 9/9/01 for the total amount of $2,377,446.24.
2. Approval of Easement for electric services at Hermosa Park. 24
3. Approval of a request to Summarily Vacate Excess Street Right-of-Way 25
at the southwest corner of Center Avenue and 25th Street, V-180 -
APN: 209-104-10 and 11.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-216 27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTER
AVENUE AND 25TM STREET
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
2
4. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement 30
(CO 01-080) located on the south side of La Senda Road, west of
Sapphire Street, submitted by Tom Coons and Rindy Coons.
RESOLUTION NO. 0'1-217 32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND
LIEN AGREEMENT FROM TOM COONS AND
RINDY COONS AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE
SAME
5. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 33
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for CUP 00-33,
located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Avenue and
Hellman Avenue, submitted by Alta Loma Assisted Living LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-218 36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP 00-33
RESOLUTION NO. 01-219 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR CUP 00-33
6. Approval of Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for 43
CUP 99-17, located at 8248 19th Street, west of Sapphire Street
(CCWD Well No. 24).
RESOLUTION NO. 01-220 45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR CUP 99-17
7. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement 46
for DRC 2001-00273, located on the south side of La Senda Road, west
of Sapphire Street, submitted by Richard A. Watson and Andrea D.
Watson.
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
3
RESOLUTION NO. 01-221 48
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND
LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD A.
WATSON AND ANDREA D. WATSON AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 49
execution of the Contract in the amount of $262,609.27 ($238,735.70
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction,
Inc. (CO 01-082), for the Construction of the Amethyst Avenue
Pavement Overlay from Highland Avenue to Wilson Avenue, to be
funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1158176-0.
9. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the Contract in the amount of $572,534.60 ($520,486.00 53
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Thomsen Landscape
(CO 01-083), for the Construction of the Heritage Park Tot Lot
Renovation, to be funded from Fund 120, Park Development Funds,
Account No. 11203055650/1203120-0 and appropriate funds from Fund
120, Park Development Fund balance to Account No.
11203055650/1203120-0.
10. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 58
execution of the Contract in the amount of $180,412.10 ($164,011.00
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Lambco
Engineering, Inc. (CO 01-084), for the Construction of the Installation of
Fiber Optic Cabling at Various Locations, to be funded from Contract
Services Funds, Account No. 10013035300.
11. Approval to accept the construction of Terra Vista Parkway Pavement 61
Rehabilitation from Chumh Street to Spruce Avenue, Contract No. 01-
036 as complete, approval to appropriate $2,550.18 to Account No.
11823035650/1326182-0 from Traffic Congestion Relief Funds, release
the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract
amount of $78,856.08.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-222 63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TERRA VISTA
PARKVVAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
FROM CHURCH STREET TO SPRUCE
AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-036, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
4
12. Approval to accept the Construction of FY 2000/2001 Local Street 64
Pavement Rehabilitation (Slurry Seal) and Parking Lot Resurfacing
(Seal Coat) Various Locations, Contact No. 01-038 as complete,
approval to appropriate $14,838.35 to Account 11763035650/1022176-
0 from Measure I Fund balance and $14,838.35 to Account
11763035650/1022176-0 from Measure I Fund balance and $14,838.35
to Account 11343035650/1000134-0 from Landscape Maintenance
District No. 4 Fund balance, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance
Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
approve the final contract amount of $538,291.17.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-223 67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FY 2000/2001
LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION (SLURRY SEAL) AND
PARKING LOT RESURFACING (SEAL COAT)
VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 01-
038, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 00-04 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. - Request to
amend the cimulation element of the General Plan to eliminate a portion
of 7th Street from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald
Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. APN: 209-211-17.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 00-05 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. - Request to amend
the circulation within the Industrial Development District, Subarea 5 to
eliminate a potion of 7th St. from approximately its current terminus east of
Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. APN: 209-211-17, 30, and 31.
ORDINANCE NO. 670 (second reading) 68
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 00-04, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A
PORTION OF 7TM STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
5
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL 71
IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of
Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft City of Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan Update. The Project Planning Area
encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as
its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north
of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations as
well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements of the
City's General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction
of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182
acres in non-residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-
residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is
increased by 18 acres. Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a
reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres
in non-residential uses. With the implementation of the proposed
General Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would
occur with buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately
9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square
feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and
approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The Project/Planning
Area includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to
the north. The City is located in the southwest corner of San Bemardino
County, 13 miles west of downtown San Bemardino. The San Gabriel
Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of Upland,
Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and east,
respectively. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is
approximately 7,700 acres. Total project/planning area comprises
approximately 31,700 acres. During these public hearings the City
Council will consider the Final EIR and proposes statements of
overriding considerations. Certification of the Final EIR and final action
on the General Plan Update will occur after the close of the public
hearings. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 19, 2001)
RESOLUTION NO. 01-226 71-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2001
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM, MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND MAKING
ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
6
RESOLUTION NO. 01-227 71-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
G.~. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 72
FOR TRACTS 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1,
14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 AND 15902, LOCATED NORTH
OF STATE ROUTE 30 BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND
HANLEY AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
RESOLUTION NO. 01-224 74
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
REPORT, ORDERING THE FORMATION OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND THE
LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001/2002 AND CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS
AND ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF
THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D
OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. ANNEXATION 01-01 - A request to approve the Tax Revenue 78
Exchange for annexation proceeding (LAFCO No. 2879) between the
County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
approximately 240 acres of the San Bernardino County unincorporated
area, generally located north of 25th Street between Day Creek Channel
and East Avenue.
City Council Agenda
October 3, 2001
7
RESOLUTION NO. 01-225 81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT
OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE
EXCHANGED BETWEEN AND AMONG THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING
FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE
DESCRIBED BY LAFCO NO. 2879
2. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $83,118.00 AWARDED BY THE 83
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM
3. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO ORDINANCE 58 86
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on September 27, 2001, seventy two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
CITY OF RC IFAE (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 53463 #B034 ..... prog: CKE00 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173249 004635 A A NqD K PHOTOGRAPHY 09/12/01 47.75 MW OH
AP00173250 000010 A A/~D R TIRE SERVICE 09/12/01 1,583.72 MW OH
AP00173251 090100 t%3% EQUIPMEN~ RENTALS CO 09/12/01 159.80 MW OH
AP00173252 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 09/12/01 874.35 MW OH
AP00173253 001334 ABLAC 09/12/01 294.06 MW OH
AP00173254 000007 ABLBTRONICS 09/12/01 61.68 MW OH
AP00173255 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 09/12/01 1,280.00 MW OH
AP00173256 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 09/12/01 11,200.00 MW OH
AP00173257 005509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 09/12/01 7,923.79 MW OH
AP00173258 000492 ~J4ERICAN pL~/qNING ASSOCIATION 09/12/01 933.00 MW OH
AP00173259 002693 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 09/12/01 1,950.00 MW OH
AP00173260 004~86 D/qDERSON, DID/~NA 09/12/01 28.00 MW OH
AP00173261 004417 APG COMP/LNY 09/12/01 8,595.00 MW OH
AP00173262 001291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 09/12/01 472.00 MW OH
AP00173263 004805 ASCE 09/12/01 175.00 MW OR Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173264 001402 ASSOCIATED POWER INC 09/12/01 579.97 MW OH
AP00173265 ~04283 ATKINS, VIRGINIA 09/12/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00173266 ~06115 AUFRAU CORPORATION 09/12/01 18,235.00 MW OH
AP00173267 000402 AUTO REETORATORS 09/12/01 7,846.51 MW OH
AP00173268 004252 AZIZI, LAW OFFICES OF SOHEILA 09/12/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00173269 004102 B ~ K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 09/12/01 1,754.33 MW OR
AP00173270 000033 BASELINE TRUE VALUE N3%RDWARB 09/12/01 33.58 MW ON
AP00173271 002981 BEARD PROVENCHER ;~ND ASSOC 09/12/01 2,700.00 MW ON
AP00173~72 006748 BEARINGS ~LND DRIVES 09/12/01 28.94 MW OH
AP00173273 021027 BERN MARIES 09/12/01 131.11 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--lo¢: FIRL~NCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... prog: CK200 ¢l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
========== ============ ============================= ======== ======~====== ==== ===~ ====== ======================================
AP00173274 002820 BER/~ELL HYDRAULICS INC 09/12/01 283.22 MW OH
AP00173275 004407 BE~ER ENERGY IDEAS 09/12/01 153.10 MW OH
AP00173276 004285 BIBB, EILDA 09/12/01 72.00 5gN OH
AP00173277 001746 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 09/12/01 1~301329 MW OH
AP00173278 003306 BON3~DI~N MCCAIN INC 09/12/01 44,562.44 MW OH
AP00173279 004287 BOR~D, TORRIA 09/12/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00173280 004833 BOOKS ON TAPE INC 09/12/01 80.55 MW OH
AP00173281 004290 BRACKEN, N~i~CY 09/12/01 41.00 MW OH
AP00173282 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/12/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00173283 004369 BRODART BOOKS 09/12/01 32,633.52 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DE
AP00173284 002924 BUDGET BLINDS 09/12/01 40.00 MW OE
AP00173285 001851 CAL WESTEPdg pAIN~ 09/12/01 2,015.63 MW OH
AP00173286 004280 CAI~DWELL, DD-NA 09/12/01 66.00 MW OH
AP00173287 001113 CALIFORlgIA CONTP~ACT CITIES AS 09/12/01 560.00 MW OE
AP00173288 004412 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 09/12/01 502.02 MW OH
AP00173289 001223 CALSENSE 09/12/01 3,303.38 MW OE
AP00173290 004288 CARR, pAM 09/12/01 65.00 MW OH
AP00173291 006052 C~L~RTER MEDIA I~% REGION 09/12/01 2,325.52 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173292 000488 CHEVRON USA INC 09/12/01 218.51 MW OH
AP00173293 004323 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 09/12/01 3,656.18 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173294 000073 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 09/12/01 93.81 MW OH
AP00173295 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 09/12/01 67.39 MW OH
AP00173296 002228 COMMUNITY BANK 09/12/01 11,834.57 MW OH
AP00173297 000130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 09/12/01 8,946.86 MW OH
AP00173298 001328 CONC~gNON, SHARI 09/12/01 199.50 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFA8 (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173299 006709 COPP CRUSHING, DAN 09/12/01 340.00 MW OH
AP00173300 000930 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 09/12/01 975.50 MW OH
AP00173301 006711 CORPORATE PRINTERS 09/12/01 775.66 MW OH
AP00173302 004293 CORPUS, EMILY 09/12/01 16.00 MW OH
AP00173303 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 09/12/01 318.50 MW OH
AP00173304 006188 COVERMASTER INC 09/12/01 125.00 MW OH
AP00173305 002845 CRRA 09/12/01 239.00 MW OH
AP00173306 000085 CUC~ONGA CO WATER DIST 09/12/01 23,471.06 MW OH
AP00173307 000239 D AIFD K CONCRETE COMP~NY 09/12/01 3,072.28 MW OH
AP00173308 003424 D/~NIEL, JOYA 09/12/01 106.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173309 003502 DD~NIEL, JOYA 09/12/01 50.40 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173310 004366 DEMCO INC 09/12/01 2,562.61 MW OH
AP00173311 004309 DEON, SANDIE 09/12/01 35.00 MW OH
AP00173312 004544 DICK, ERIC 09/12/01 322.50 MW OH
AP00173313 000109 DICTAPHONE CORP 09/12/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173314 004321 DISCIPLES OF JESUS 09/12/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173315 004310 DOMINGUEZ, ALICE 09/12/01 99.50 MW OH
AP00173316 004311 DOSSEY, DEBROAH 09/12/01 51.00 MW OH
AP00173317 004205 DyN~]~IC GRAPHICS INC 09/12/01 58.98 MW OH
AP00173318 006716 ECONOMICS PRESS INC, THE 09/12/01 49.40 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173319 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 09/12/01 56.98 MW OH
AP00173320 000229 EWING IPd~IGATION PRODUCTS 09/12/01 3,267.51 MW OH
AP0017~321 004312 EY, LOL~RDES 09/12/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00173322 000779 EZ RENTALS 09/12/01 787.35 MW OH
AP00173323 002103 FAUST PRINTING INC 09/12/01 45.82 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCNER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINe,NCR---job: 53463 #S034 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173324 000124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPI~%ND INC 09/12/01 35.48 MW OR Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173325 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 09/12/01 1,805.70 MW OH
AP00173326 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 09/12/01 2,168.36 MW OH
AP00173327 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 09/12/01 1~,863346 MW OH
AP00173328 006101 FIVE ST~ CATERING SERVICE 09/12/01 100.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173329 004313 FOR RENT MAGAZINE 09/12/01 205.39 MW OH
AP00173330 002840 FORD OF UPL~2~D INC 09/12/01 2,461.44 MW OR
AP00173331 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 09/12/01 148.09 MW ON
AP00173332 004686 GAYLORD BROTRERS 09/12/01 71.75 MW OH
AP00173333 001152 GCS SERVICE INC 09/12/01 1,014.20 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173334 005780 GID/qT INLAND EMPIRE RV CENTER 09/12/01 404.77 MW OH
AP00173335 004314 GILLII~/qD, SOPHI 09/12/01 67.00 MW OH
AP00173336 041302 GOLD MOUNTAIN MORTGAGE 09/12/01 7.59 MW OH
AP00173337 005955 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 09/12/01 124.20 MW OR
AP00173338 001245 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 09/12/01 2,500.00 MW OH
AP00173339 004315 GONZALEZ, COLLEEN 09/12/01 13.00 MW OH
AP00173340 004317 C~DRNBRIN, CAROL 09/12/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00173341 000650 GRAINGER, WW 09/12/01 886.55 MW OH
AP00173342 003395 GRANGER AND SON CONSTRUCTION 09/12/01 11.61 MW OR
AP00173343 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 09/12/01 296.16 MW OR
AP00173344 090713 GREENWOOD'S UNIFORMS 09/12/01 67.24 MW OH
AP00173345 004096 GROSH SCENIC RENTALS INC 09/12/01 1,231.20 MW OH
AP00173346 004320 GUTIERREZ, NORBERTO 09/12/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173347 004260 RALDERSON, DEBRA 09/12/01 55.00 MW OR
AP00173348 004246 HANDLEN DISTRIBUTIONS COMPA/~Y 09/12/01 24.26 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 6:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 53463 $S034 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
========== ~==~======== ============================= ======== ======~====== ==== ==== ====== ======================================
AP00173349 000462 HCS Cb'fLER STEEL CO 09/12/01 33.48 ~ OH
AP00173350 004298 HEREDIA, JAKE DAfX 09/12/01 7.00 ~ OH
AP00173351 004106 HEP~/~DEZ, MICEAEL 09/12/01 22.00 ~5~ OH
AP00173352 002197 HERTZ EQUIP RENT~J~ 09/12/01 ~,380.50 ~K~ OH
AP00173353 004724 HI WAY SAFETY INC 09/12/01 145.50 MW OH
AP00173364 004258 HILL, ANDREA 09/12/01 57.00 ~ OH
AP00173355 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 09/12/01 89.81 MW OH
AP00173356 003633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS D=ND E 09/12/01 168.00 MW OH
AP00173357 003634 HOUSE OF RL~H 09/12/01 637.00 MW OH
AP00173358 004227 HOWARDS GARAGE DOOR 09/12/01 19.00 MWEW OH
AP00173359 002284 Hb~4~-NSCALE CORPORATION 09/12/01 378.53 MW OH
AP00173360 001325 HURST, CHERYL 09/12/01 313.50 MW OH Payee Name diffurent in Check DB
AP00173361 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 09/12/01 959.75 MW OH
AP00173362 031764 IBM CORP 09/12/01 1,645.00 ~5~ OH
AP00173363 004254 IBM CORPORATION 09/12/01 1,230.52 ~ OH
AP00173364 001218 INDUSTRIAL DIETRIBL~fION GROUP 09/12/01 1,416.47 MW OH
AP00173365 032683 INLAND CARPET CLEANING 09/12/01 7.95 MW OH
AP00173366 006682 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIA 09/12/01 867.47 MW OH
AP00173367 000092 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 09/12/01 169.00 MW OH
AP00173368 002315 INLJ~D WHOLESALE NURSERY 09/12/01 126.34 MW OH
AP00173369 006497 INSIGHT DIRECT 09/12/01 870.98 5TW OH
AP00173370 004248 INTEGPd% PLASTICS BLOW A~ND INJ 09/12/01 48.00 MW OH
AP00173371 002432 INTELLI TECH 09/12/01 822.38 MW OH
AP00173372 004262 ITEN, JOHN 09/12/01 36.00 MW OH
AP00173373 004263 JA~4ERSON, NOR/~ 09/12/01 7.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T B R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 53463 #E034 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173374 003935 JENKINS, SALLEY 09/12/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173375 004238 JENNY CRAIG WEIGHT LOSS CENTE 09/12/01 23.00 MW OB
AP00173376 004240 JO ANN FABRICS D/gD CRAFTS NO 09/12/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00173377 004299 JOHNSON-BATEMAN COMPANY 09/12/01 --188.34 MW OH
AP00173378 005283 JONES D/gD MAYER, LAW OFFICES 09/12/01 1,250.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173379 004232 JUST BARGAINS FOOD STORE 09/12/01 26.40 MW ON
AP00173380 004264 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 09/12/01 54.00 MW OH
AP00173381 000149 KING, LD 09/12/01 2,289.05 MW OH
AP00173382 006193 KLAMATH BAY 09/12/01 4,658.55 MW OH
AP00173383 004228 KOCH, LAW OFFICES OF NORMA A 09/12/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00173384 004982 KOR/LNDA CONSTRUCTION 09/12/01 5,835.60 MW OH
AP00173385 006516 }{RUSE, JOAN A 09/12/01 1,260.00 MW OH
AP00173386 004302 KUPECZ, ELLEN 09/12/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173387 004300 ~AC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 09/12/01 4.00 MW OH
AP00173388 004233 L A CUSTOM POOLS AND SPAS INC 09/12/01 70.00 MW OH
AP00173389 000088 LA VOZ 09/12/01 96.00 MW OH
AP00173390 001075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 09/12/01 405.48 MW OH
AP00173391 001664 LAMPE, JARRED 09/12/01 290.00 MW OH
AP00173392 004255 LANCE COF/V//NICATIONS 09/12/01 68.40 MW OH
AP00173393 004113 LAVALLE, PATRICIA 09/12/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173394 005300 LAW OFFICES OF JONES ~ MAYE 09/12/01 3,887.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173395 004268 LAY, BUNLAK 09/12/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173396 002368 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 09/12/01 55.65 MW ON
AP00173397 031832 LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STU 09/12/01 15.00 MW OH
AP00173398 001005 LIL STITCH 09/12/01 314.98 MW OH
CITY OF RC IPAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T H R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ;~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173399 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 09/12/01 930.00 MW
AP00173400 004304 LIN, SUE 09/12/01 50.00 MW
AP00173401 002048 LITTLE TIKES COMmeRCIAL PLAY 09/12/01 292.79 MW OH
AP00173402 004303 LOAI~ ARCILLA, MONICA 09/12/01 -- 30.00 MW OH
AP00173403 005662 LOS ~GELES COCA COLA BTL CO 09/12/01 224.62 MW OH
AP00173404 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 09/12/01 251.00 MW OH
AP00173405 002587 LUTTER~, GEORGE 09/12/01 768.00 MW OH
AP00173406 032445 LYLE, PATRICIA 09/12/01 64.00 MW OH
AP00173407 001062 M C I WORLDCOM 09/12/01 1,267.19 MW OH
AP00173408 004272 MADLOCK, MARCELLA 09/12/01 36.00 MW OH
AP00173409 032729 MAIER, LIZA 09/12/01 27.00 MW OH
AP00173410 004318 MA~GUNSONG, WESLEY 09/12/01 137.50 MW OH
AP00173411 004270 MARES, SABRINA 09/12/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00173412 000549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTbq{AL ENT IN 09/12/01 81,677.62 MW
AP00173413 000250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 09/12/01 225.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173414 003871 MATT'S HARDWARE 09/12/01 43.80 MW OH
AP00173415 004249 MC ALANS PUB AND GRILLE 09/12/01 97.36 MW OH
AP00173416 000884 MCGAUGHEY, IRMA 09/12/01 24.00 MW OH
AP00173417 003360 MDS CONSULTING 09/12/01 1,641.00 MW OH
AP00173418 004250 MERILLAT CORPORATION 09/12/01 25.51 MW OH
AP00173419 031882 MEYER DISTRIBUTING 09/12/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00173420 006170 MICROAGE COMPUTERMA/{T 09/12/01 4,581.65 MW OH
AP00173421 004273 MITCHELL~ TOWD/~DA 09/12/01 55.00 MW OH
AP00173422 004245 MODULAR MANq3FACTURING HOLDING 09/12/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00173423 004271 MOFFIT, DEBBIE 09/12/01 70.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, SEP 12, 2001, ~:31 PM --req: KFINCRER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~LNCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173~24 003658 MONTE'S CAMERA SHOP 09/12/01 1,197.34 MW OH
AP00173425 032493 MORENO, KIM 09/12/01 64.80 MW OH
AP00173426 004229 N F U INC 09/12/01 225.17 MW OH
AP00173427 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 09/12/01 -- 13~85 MW OH
AP00173428 004277 NA}4KUNG, WOL RANG 09/12/01 22.00 MW OH
AP00173429 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 09/12/01 72.49 MW OH
AP00173430 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 09/12/01 20,326.23 MW OH
AP00173431 004274 NAVAS, APRIL 09/12/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00173432 006057 NIKKIS FLAG SHOPPE 09/12/01 735.98 MW OH
AP00173433 004178 NILES CONSTRUCTION 09/12/01 3,420.00 MW OH
AP00173434 000433 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 09/12/01 1,024.27 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173435 004226 OASIS CONSULTINS 09/12/01 58.99 MW OH
AP00173436 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 09/12/01 3,312.40 MW OH
AP00173437 004275 OGUNYEMI, JOANNE 09/12/01 27.00 MW OH
AP00173438 004265 OLIVAS, KELLY 09/12/01 48.00 MW OH
AP00173439 004230 OMNI TRAINING CORPORATION 09/12/01 249.35 MW OH
AP00173440 002205 OUTDOOR DIMENSIONS 09/12/01 5.40 MW OH
AP00173441 004243 PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS LLC 09/12/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173442 001441 PACIFIC BELL 09/12/01 4,566.08 MW OH
AP00173443 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP /LND IRRIGATION 09/12/01 347.60 MW OH
AP00173444 033008 PACIFIC JUICE AND JAVE 09/12/01 182.57 MW OH
AP00173445 003741 PALLOTTO, BILL 09/12/01 230.00 MW OH
AP00173446 004295 PALM, DANIEL 09/12/01 20.00 MW OR
AP00173447 004297 pAArDA DEVELOPMENT ~ CONSTRU 09/12/01 40,050.00 MW OH
AP00173448 003293 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 09/12/01 2,708.77 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, SEP 12, Z001, 5:31 PM -oreq: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... pro~: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173449 000791 PMIDELTA CARE 09/12/01 1,172.26 MW OH
AP00173450 004241 POLAKOVIC, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN 09/12/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173451 032672 POWER PROS ELECTRIC CO 09/12/01 33.49 MW OH
AP00173452 000758 PRAY~AIR DISTRIBUTION INC 09/12/01 568.85 MW OH
AP00173453 004231 PRESTIGE STATIONS INC NO 9692 09/12/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173454 001811 PROAV 09/12/01 9,000.00 MW OH
AP00173455 000295 PRYOR RESOURCES INC 09/12/01 395.00 MW OH
AP00173456 002176 QUI~DR/~NT SYSTEMS INC 09/12/01 164.00 MW OH
AP00173457 001323 QUINTAiqA, ZITA 09/12/01 193.00 PSq ON
AP00173458 004234 QUIZNOS CLASSIC SUBS 09/12/01 43.75 MW OH
AP00173459 003663 R AND T SPECCIALTY INC 09/12/01 1,205.09 MW OH
AP00173460 002705 R H F INC 09/12/01 279.08 MW OH
AP00173461 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPA~qY 09/12/01 253.54 MW OH
AP00173462 005174 RANCHO CUCAMONOA FAMILY YMCA 09/12/01 2,500.00 MW OH
AP00173463 004130 RBM LOCK D/~D KEY SERVICE 09/12/01 96.54 MW OH
AP00173464 001324 REINH/%RDTSEN, DEBRA 09/12/01 282.50 MW OH
AP00173465 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 09/12/01 902.30 MW OH
AP00173466 000528 RIDGELINE ROOFING 09/12/01 32.50 MW OH
AP00173467 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 09/12/01 734.00 MW OH
AP00173468 004257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPAN 09/12/01 106,511.11 MW OH
AP00173469 003314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 09/12/01 3,130.32 MW OH
AP00173470 000626 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 09/12/01 299.50 MW OH
AP00173471 091824 RODRIGUEZ, ALICIA 09/12/01 750.00 MW OH
AP00173472 006117 S B AAID 0 INC 09/12/01 636.00 MW OH
AP00173473 002084 SAFECO INS CO GROUP ~/DMIN 09/12/01 1,818.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G ! S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 10
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCEER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIND/gCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~%mount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173474 005745 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 09/12/01 576.81 ~ OH
AP00173475 004326 S~LCEDO, STEVE 09/12/01 22.00 ~ OH
AP00173476 004432 S~ BERN ASSOC GOVER/~4EN~fS 09/12/01 4,259.39 ~5~ OH
AP00173477 001590 S/LN BEP~N CO%~TY CHILD SUPPORT 09/12/01 --150.00 ~ OH
AP00173478 001590 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 09/12/01 289.68 MW OH
AP00173479 001590 S/~N BERN CObqqTY CHILD SUPPORT 09/12/01 49.65 MW OR
AP00173480 000150 S~N BER/~ COUNTY 09/12/01 9,986.00 ~4 OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173481 003761 SAN SERNAP~INO CAL STATE UNIV 09/12/01 139.00 MW OH
AP00173482 003761 S~N BERi~ARDINO CAL STATE UNIV 09/12/01 278.00 MW OH
AP00173483 003761 S~N BERNARDINO CAL STATE UNIV 09/12/01 278.00 MW OH
AP00173484 004328 SAUNIER, MARCEI~ 09/12/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00173485 004330 SERRA/qO, NOR~4A 09/12/01 33.00 MW OR
AP00173486 012180 SIPNOMSAY, SID 09/12/01 137.18 MW OH
AP00173487 001327 S~5%RT AND FINAL 09/12/01 1,917.22 MW OH
AP00173488 003231 SMIRL, BRETT 09/12/01 20.00 MW OR
AP00173489 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 09/12/01 111,361.63 MW OH
AP00173490 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 09/12/01 1,198.71 MW OH
AP00173491 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/12/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00173492 VOID.CO~TfINU Void - Continued Stub 09/12/01 0.00 %q~ OH Void
AP00173493 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 09/12/01 6,918.27 MW OH
AP00173494 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 09/12/01 708.37 MW OH
AP00173495 005281 STERICYCLE INC 09/12/01 245.61 MW OH
AP00173496 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 09/12/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173497 005079 SYNCERONEX 09/12/01 5,486.85 ~ OH
AP00173498 005410 T ~ D INSTALLATIONS 09/12/01 254.07 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09'/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173499 000836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 09/12/01 109.00 MW OH
AP00173500 002344 TARGET 09/12/01 315.41 MW OH
AP00173501 004569 TEES PLUS 09/12/01 2,458.69 MW OH
AP00173502 003942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 09/12/01 328.00 MW OH
AP00173503 004448 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 09/12/01 1,958.15 MW OH
AP00173904 004331 TRUJILLO, 5L~RILYN 09/12/01 56.00 MW OH
AP00173508 006554 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 09/12/01 8,000.00 MW OH
AP00173506 005601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN 09/12/01 591.28 MW OW
AP00173507 003844 UNITED RENTALS 09/12/01 420.22 MW OH
AP00173508 002682 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 09/12/01 4,500.00 MW OH
AP00173509 000919 UNITED WAY 09/12/01 627.32 MW OH
AP00173510 006004 U~ITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 09/12/01 284.88 ~4W OH
AP00173511 003089 UNIVERSAL STUDIOS 09/12/01 889.35 MW OH
AP00173512 004558 US GUARDS CO INC 09/12/01 10,216.75 MW OH
AP00173513 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/12/01 230.10 MW OH
AP00173514 001329 VOLM, LIZA 09/12/01 112.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173515 000046 VULC_~N CALMAT ASP~L~LT 09/12/01 1,658.87 MW 'OH
AP00173516 012674 WALKER, RAW~q 09/12/01 20.00 ~W OH
AP00173517 004332 WALLACE, VINCENT 09/12/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00173518 004333 WASIN, TASNEEM 09/12/01 7.10 MW OH
AP00173519 004334 WATJARA, RAVIWAB 09/12/01 100.00 MW OR
AP00173520 000213 WAXIE 09/12/01 8,857.47 MW OH
AP00173521 006681 WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM SOVA 09/12/01 654.75 MW OH
AP00173522 004405 WEST END YWCA 09/12/01 565.00 MW OH
AP00173523 005199 WILLEY~ASSOC DBA LASER LINE 09/12/01 1,219.96 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 12
WED, SEP 12, 2001, 5:31 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 53463 #S034 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173524 012660 WLC ARCHITECTS 09/12/01 2,000.00 MW OH
AP00173525 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 09/12/01 179.76 MW OH
AP00173526 003604 YIP, LYNNE 09/12/01 64.00 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 3
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 759,622.54 Number of Checks Processed: 275
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T 0 T A L 759,622.54
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, SBP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZDJ~E--le~: GL JL--loc: FINA/qCE---job: 54484 #E048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check D~aount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173602 001415 7TH STREET PACIFIC LLC 09/19/01 1,000.00 ~ OH AR
AP00173603 006451 A D/qD A AUTOMOTIVE 09/19/01 91.65 5fW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173604 004635 A /LND K PHOTOGRAPHY 09/19/01 12.63 MW OH
AP00173605 090105 A2Z SIGNS DONE RIGHT 09/19/01 950.05 MW OH
AP00173606 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 09/19/01 248.81 MW OH
AP00173607 006309 ADAMSON, RONALD 09/19/01 1,280.00 MW OH
AP00173608 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 09/19/01 1,155.00 MW OH
AP00173609 004409 AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERING 09/19/01 89.25 MW OR
AP00173610 004411 ALL WAYS TILE 09/19/01 31.50 MW OH
AP00173611 001402 ASSOCIATED POWER INC 09/19/01 1,181.70 MW OH
AP00173612 004400 AYSO 09/19/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173613 004415 BACKOFEN, PATTY 09/19/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00173614 004441 BEST BUY CO INC 09/19/01 42.98 MW OH
AP00173615 001746 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 09/19/01 4, 519.08 MW OH
AP00173616 004418 BONET, JANEY 09/19/01 72.00 MW OR
AP00173617 004402 BPS GROUP INC 09/19/01 80.00 MW OH
AP00173618 004369 BRODART BOOKS 09/19/01 109.08 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173619 004423 BULLON, EDITH 09/19/01 .40.00 MW OH
AP00173620 004410 BUP~NS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 09/19/01 3,575.61 MW OH
AP00173621 005746 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 09/19/01 1,647.50 MW OH
AP00173622 022140 CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 09/19/01 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00173623 004413 CAPITAL CABINET CORPORATION 09/19/01 31.01 5CW OH
AP00173624 004325 CARi~BY, CECIL 09/19/01 8,250.00 MW OH
AP00173625 005881 CARTE GRAPH SYSTEMS 09/19/01 3,225.00 MW OH
AP00173626 003001 CENTEX HOMES 09/19/01 7.50 MW OH
CITY Of RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173627 006655 CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFEC 09/19/01 13,229.58 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173628 006052 CHARTER MWDIA LA REGION 09/19/01 1,718.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173629 004406 CHAVEZ MEXIC~N FOOD 09/19/01 15.01 MW OH
AP00173630 000074 CITY RENTALS 09/19/01 --534-93 MW OH
AP00173631 002841 CLARY CORPORATION 09/19/01 85,677.50 MW OH
AP00173632 004949 CLOUT 09/19/01 16.00 MW OH
AP00173633 006215 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY 09/19/01 1,300.00 MW OH
AP00173634 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 09/19/01 58.76 MW OH
AP00173635 002228 COMMUNITY BANK 09/19/01 1,191.00 MW OH
AP00173636 004416 COOP, JENNIFER 09/19/01 25.20 MW OH
AP00173637 006709 COPP CRUSHING, DAN 09/19/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00173638 001437 CPRS 09/19/01 125.00 MW OH
A~00173639 004404 CRAFTS UNLIMITED 09/19/01 17.91 MW OH
AP00173640 003662 CREATIVE BUSINESS CONCEPTS IN 09/19/01 2,600.00 MW OH
AP00173641 001064 CREATIVE WHOLESALE 09/19/01 34.62 MW OH
AP00173642 000085 CUCD~4ONGA CO WATER DIST 09/19/01 15,565.02 MW OH
AP00173643 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 09/19/01 3,772.07 MW OH
AP00173644 002512 D A R E AMERICA 09/19/01 104.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173645 000239 D A-ND K CONCRETE COMPA~NY 09/19/01 334.33 MW OH
AP00173646 000105 D~ GUERRA D/gD ASSOCIATES 09/19/01 9,034.50 MW OH
AP00173647 004425 DANCE TERRIFIC 09/19/01 8.23 MW OH
AP00173648 004090 DAVIS ART 09/19/01 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00173649 003698 DEALERS AUTO TRIM 09/19/01 75.00 MW OH
AP00173650 003149 DECK THE WALLS 09/19/01 499.00 MW OH
AP00173651 004544 DICK, ERIC 09/19/01 75.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND/qCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173652 005744 DIRECTV 09/19/01 27.99 MW OH
AP00173653 004219 DISTRICT XI 09/19/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173654 004219 DISTRICT XI 09/19/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173655 004219 DISTRICT XI 09/19/01 -- 25.00 MW OH
AP00173656 004219 DISTRICT XI 09/19/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173657 004219 DISTRICT XI 09/19/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173658 004426 DIXON, W~/TDA 09/19/01 27.00 MW OH
AP00173659 004427 DYNAMIX DA/qCE ACADEMY 09/19/01 7.50 MW OH
AP00173660 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 09/19/01 34.40 MW OB
AP00173661 005030 EL NATIVO GROWERS INC. 09/19/01 774.00 MW OH
AP00173662 003614 ELITE TOWING 09/19/01 40.00 MW OB
AP00173663 090520 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 09/19/01 10,556.40 MW OB
AP00173664 000229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 09/19/01 117.15 MW OH
AP00173665 004428 EXECUTIVE ~SCAPE INC 09/19/01 109.44 MW OH
AP00173666 000124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLD/~D INC 09/19/01 929.46 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173667 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 09/19/01 3,945.28 MW OH
AP00173668 004430 FIOL, GENOVEVE 09/19/01 72.00 MW OH
AP00173669 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 09/19/01 151.75 MW OH
AP00173670 006440 FLUORESCO LIGHTING 09/19/01 137.25 MW OH
AP00173671 000526 FOOTHILL C3~RPET AAID MATTRESS 09/19/01 12,900.00 MW OH
AP0017367E 004762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 09/19/01 250.00 MW OH
AP00173673 004098 FORBES 09/19/01 19.99 MW OH
AP00173674 006074 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 09/19/01 2,160.00 MW OH
AP00173675 006313 GAIL MATERIALS 09/19/01 1,094.51 MW OB
AP00173676 004429 GALARDI GROUP FP~ANCBISE A-ND 09/19/01 2,555.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173677 000093 GOVERATMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A 09/19/01 47.00 MW OH
AP00173678 000650 GRAINGER, WW 09/19/01 209.63 MW OH
AP00173679 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 09/19/01 2,i34.93 MW OR
AP00173680 004433 GYPSUM CONSTRUCTION INC 09/19/01 -- 93~16 MW OH
AP00173681 005699 HARAI~%MBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 09/19/01 282.52 MW OH
AP00173682 003203 ~ARRIS J R. ELECTRIC CO 09/19/01 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00173683 003504 HASSOUN, BAREA 09/19/01 147.25 MW OH
AP00173684 001244 HAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS 09/19/01 63.40 MW OH
AP00173685 004357 MELLEN'S HIDDEN TP~EASURES 09/19/01 10.60 MW OH
AP00173686 004358 HEP~N/~qDEZ, COLLEEN 09/19/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00173687 002256 HI LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 09/19/01 259.53 MW OH
AP00173688 004359 MIGGINS, KEVIN 09/19/01 41.00 MW OH
AP00173689 004362 HILL, KAREN 09/19/01 36.00 MW OB
AP00173690 001349 HINOJOS, KERI 09/19/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00173691 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 09/19/01 1,393.14 MW OH
AP00173692 002255 MOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 09/19/01 172.00 MW OH
AP00173693 090817 HO~4E DEPOT/GECF, THE 09/19/01 409.37 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173694 001377 HOPPERS DRAFTING FURNITURE A-N 09/19/01 4,266.68 MW OH
AP00173695 001138 HORTON, D R INC 09/19/01 11.25 ~ OH
AP00173696 001234 HOSE M~tN INC 09/19/01 16.91 ~ OH
AP00173697 000161 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 09/19/01 26.26 MW OH
AP00173698 002284 MI/M/~NSCALE CORPOPJ~TION 09/19/01 727.45 MW OH
AP00173699 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 09/19/01 232.32 MW OR
AP00173700 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 09/19/01 688.38 MW OH
AP00173701 006682 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIA 09/19/01 2,550.48 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZ0kLE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173702 090925 INSIGHT 09/19/01 808.02 MW OH
AP00173703 090933 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 09/19/01 478.00 MW OH
AP00173704 003452 IN~fRAVAIA ROCK ~ SPEND 09/19/01 300.78 MW OH
AP00173705 004375 JE ASSESSMENT SERVICES INC 09/19/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173706 004376 JE COMPLI~-NCE SERVICES INC 09/19/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173707 000175 JOBS AVAILABLE 09/19/01 138.00 MW OH
AP00173708 004365 JOHNSON, CHUCK 09/19/01 47.50 MW OH
AP00173709 004378 JOHNSON, STEPEAN ATTORNEY AT 09/19/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00173710 005283 JONES AND MAYER, L~W OFFICES 09/19/01 46,106.25 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173711 004103 JUAN E CASTELLANOS 09/19/01 250.00 MW OH AR
AP00173712 004221 KEYZONE ENTERPRISES 09/19/01 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00173713 003413 KLOTZSCHE, PETER A 09/19/01 300.00 MW OH AR
AP00173714 001024 KOCH ~%TERIALS COMPANY 09/19/01 136.28 MW OH
AP00173715 004982 KOP~A CONSTRUCTION 09/19/01 803.90 MW OR
AP00173716 004379 KOSLOWSKI, LORRAINE 09/19/01 7.00 MW OH
AP00173717 005545 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 09/19/01 30,950.22 MW OH
AP00173718 000193 L~IRD CONSTRUCTION CO 09/19/01 91,949.67 MW OH
AP00173719 002633 I~, JACK 09/19/01 182.00 MW OH
AP00173720 001664 I~%MPE, JARRED 09/19/01 655.00 MW OH
AP00173721 006675 LARABEE, JULIE 09/19/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00173722 000849 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 09/19/01 701.42 MW OH
AP00173723 004381 LEE, MAY 09/19/01 57.60 MW OR
AP00173724 006327 LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION 09/19/01 470.27 MW OH
AP00173725 001005 LIL STITCH 09/19/01 32.14 MW OH
AP00173726 005662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 09/19/01 500.26 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZ~LE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount T~rpe Subs Rel To Note
AP00173727 000200 LOS D-NGELES TIMES 09/19/01 45.75 MW OH
AP00173728 003156 LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC 09/19/01 304.66 MW OH
AP00173729 002587 LUTTEP~, GEORGE 09/19/01 768.00 MW OH
AP00173730 000549 ~IPOSA HORTICULTUR3%L ENT IN 09/19/01 147'~,098~65 MW OH
AP00173731 004095 F~RS NETWORK 09/19/01 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00173732 004727 MARSHALL PLUMBING 09/19/01 2,332.50 MW OH
AP00173733 006170 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 09/19/01 1,274.74 MW OH
AP00173734 005852 MIDWEST TAPE 09/19/01 5.99 MW OH
AP00173735 032768 MITT~J~S DENTAL OFFICE, DR 09/19/01 46.14 MW OH
AP00173736 007183 MORALES, MELISSA 09/19/01 5.17 MW OH
AP00173737 004434 MOUNTAIN UNION TELECOM 09/19/01 2,850.00 MW OH
AP00173738 001020 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS ~ MIRRO 09/19/01 338.00 MW OH
AP00173739 032555 MR ~/~D MRS PIERCE 09/19/01 21.00 MW OH
AP00173740 004442 MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT 09/19/01 36.00 MW OH
AP00173741 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 09/19/01 801.09 MW OE
AP00173742 032750 ALAPM 09/19/01 160.00 MW OH
AP00173743 006687 NATIONS RENT 09/19/01 61.82 MW OH
AP00173744 004139 NEWSWEEK 09/19/01 21.00 MW OH
AP00173745 003944 NIETO JONES, NOPJ~A 09/19/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00173746 000433 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 09/19/01 2,853.55 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173747 001033 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 09/19/01 1{000.00 MW OH AR
AP00173748 033021 NOVAK, LORI 09/19/01 90.00 MW OH
AP00173749 002884 NWOKEABIA JOHN O 09/19/01 45.00 MW OE AR
AP00173750 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 09/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00173751 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 09/19/01 3,741.77 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: .FINANCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173~52 032069 ORTIZ, SD2~i~THA 09/19/01 100.00 ~ OH
AP00173753 001441 PACIFIC BELL 09/19/01 7,034.57 ~ OH
AP00173754 006287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFOP. NIA 09/19/01 42,321.68 MW OH
AP00173755 006668 PAINTING TEE TOWN 09/19/01 ~,043]00 MW OH
AP00173756 004446 PASADENA, CITY OF 09/19/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173757 004267 PETES RO~/~ SERVICE 09/19/01 156.84 MW OH
AP00173758 004289 PHONG, LORRAINE 09/19/01 100.00 ~ OH
AP00173759 000255 po~L~ DISTRIBL~EING CO 09/19/01 21,341.26 ~ OH
AP00173760 001257 POMONA FIRST FEDERAL BA/~D ~ 09/19/01 400.00 N~4 OH
AP00173761 004385 POQUIZ, D,MY 09/19/01 108.00 MW OH
AP00173762 000758 PPJ%XAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 09/19/01 258.51 ~ OH
AP00173763 003500 PRECISION DYN~34ICS CORPORATIO 09/19/01 434.42 MW OH
AP00173764 005899 QU~ITY ONE ENGRAVING 09/19/01 17.20 MW OH
AP00173765 000345 R D O EQUIPMENT CO POWERPLD/q 09/19/01 139.05 MW OH
AP00173766 002705 R H F INC 09/19/01 112.78 5TW OH
AP00173767 001038 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 09/19/01 10,150.45 ~ OH
AP00173768 001275 RADIO S~ACK 09/19/01 3.00 ~ OH
AP00173769 004389 P~AINBOW GEMS 09/19/01 6.99 ~K~ OH
AP00173770 000070 P~ANCHO CUC~/~ONGA CF~%MBER 09/19/01 130.00 ~ OH
AP00173771 006058 RANCHO SCREEN PRIAVf ~ EMWRO 09/19/01 15.00 5fW OH
AP00173772 004130 RBM LOCK ~ Y~EY SERVICE 09/19/01 58.55 MW OH
AP00173773 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 09/19/01 3,225.52 ~ OH
AP00173774 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 09/19/01 132.49 MW OH
AP00173775 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRIC~L SUPPL 09/19/01 39,570.35 MW OH
AP00173776 000443 RRI CONSULTING 09/19/01 5,805.00 ~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CBECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loe: FIND/qCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount T~rpe Subs Rel To Note
AP00173777 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 09/19/01 135.97 MW OH
AP00173778 004257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPAN 09/19/01 10,719.00 MW OH
AP00173779 000418 PuMA GROUP 09/19/01 4,828.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173780 003314 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 09/19/01 -- 13-18 MW OH
AP00173781 000626 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 09/19/01 290.00 MW OH
AP00173782 004384 ROGERS, ROBERT 09/19/01 170.00 MW OH
AP00173783 007228 ROSAS, LIRIO 09/19/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00173784 002082 ROYA3~ WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 09/19/01 640.23 MW OH
AP00173785 003137 SAFETY CENTER 09/19/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00173786 005538 SAN AN~fONIO ~2%TERIALS 09/19/01 348.78 MW OR
AP00173787 000305 SAwN BEP~N COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 09/19/01 284.91 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173788 000301 S~ BEP~N COUNTY SHERIFFS 09/19/01 19,772.96 MW OH
AP00173789 000279 SA/~ BERN COUNTY SUN 09/19/01 80.60 MW OH
AP00173790 000150 S~N BERN COUNTY 09/19/01 24,437.16 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173791 000214 SAN BERN COI/NTY 09/19/01 1,907.46 MW OH
AP00173792 000150 S~ BERN COUNTY 09/19/01 67.65 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173793 000132 S/~N DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 09/19/01 271.98 MW OH
AP00173794 004390 SASCO ELECTRIC 09/19/01 159.60 MW OH
AP00173795 003659 SHIMOMURA, TAKASHI 09/19/01 250.00 MW OH AR
AP00173796 004393 SHOETERIA IND 09/19/01 2,225.64 MW OH
AP00173797 002666 SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS 09/19/01 9.49 MW OH
AP00173798 004391 SIMM & ASSOCIATES 09/19/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00173799 004392 SIMPSON, PAULINE 09/19/01 18.00 MW OB
AP00173800 001327 SMART ~ FINAL 09/19/01 1,499.53 MW OH
AP00173801 000319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 09/19/01 52.19 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER pa~e 9
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173802 001825 SOFT CHOICE CORP 09/19/01 571.90 MW
AP00173803 004395 SOLTIS 09/19/01 6.56 MW OH
AP00173804 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 09/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00173805 001432 SOUTHER/~ C~LIFOP~NIA EDISON 09/19/01 9,214.78 MW
AP00173806 006315 SOUTHWEST AERIAL A-ND CRANE IN 09/19/01 1,914.85 MW OH
AP00173807 003597 STATE OF CALIFORi~IA 09/19/01 10,714.32 MW
AP00173808 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 09/19/01 2,681.63 MW OH
AP00173809 005281 STERICYCLE INC 09/19/01 409.35 MW OH
AP00173810 004132 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 09/19/01 127.60 MW
AP00173811 001373 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 09/19/01 192.90 MW OH
AP00173812 005837 ETO~r~ ROOFING 09/19/01 8,090.00 MW OH
AP00173813 004733 SUNRISE FORD 09/19/01 479.88 MW OH
AP00173814 005685 SURE SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTI 09/19/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00173815 004397 SYGMA NETWORK, INC 09/19/01 23.00 MW OH
AP00173816 005410 T ~ D INSTALLATIONS 09/19/01 964.66 MW OH
AP00173817 002234 TCM LLC 09/19/01 31.03 MW OH
AP00173818 003942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 09/19/01 298.00 MW
AP00173819 002584 TIME WARNER TELECOM 09/19/01 2,500.00 MW OH
AP00173820 004448 TRF~%DWAY GRAPHICS 09/19/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00173821 003388 TRUGREEN LA~DC~E REGIONAL 09/19/01 10,420.00 MW OH
AP00173822 006554 TURCH ~ ASSOCIATES, DAVID 09/19/01 4,000.00 MW OH
AP00173823 012070 bq~A~SKY, LAUREN 09/19/01 42.50 MW OH
AP00173824 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 09/19/01 2,907.32 MW OH
AP00173825 005601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN 09/19/01 576.28 MW OH
AP00173826 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 09/19/01 58.04 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN;%NCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173827 004399 UNITED UNIFORM 09/19/01 26.00 MW OH
AP00173828 000919 UNITED WAY 09/19/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00173829 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 09/19/01 1,412.82 ~ OH
AP00173830 000350 US POSTMASTER 09/19/01 --125~00 MW OH
AP00173831 005906 USA TODAY 09/19/01 127.93
AP00173832 VOID.COAVfINU Void - Continued Stub 09/19/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00173833 000137 VERIZON CALIPORNIA 09/19/01 3,237.66 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173834 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 09/19/01 1,661.26 MW OH Paye~ Name different in Check DB
AP00173835 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/19/01 213.61 MW OH
AP00173836 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/19/01 37.45 MW
AP00173837 002868 WALL STREET JOURNAL 09/19/01 95.68 MW OE
AP00173838 004333 WASIM, TASNEEM 09/19/01 3.20 MW OH
AP00173839 004002 WASTE Fh%NAGEMENT 09/19/01 1,121.95 MW OH
AP00173840 000213 WA-XIE 09/19/01 4,304.90 MW OH
AP00173841 004398 WAYNE CO, BRUCE 09/19/01 92.84 MW OE
AP00173842 004435 WESLEY, TIEEEHA 09/19/01 23.00 MW
AP00173843 006727 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 09/19/01 433.21 MW OE Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173844 005526 WEST GROUP 09/19/01 327.86 MW OH
AP00173845 006637 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 09/19/01 16,235.55 MW OE
AP00173846 000399 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DI 09/19/01 15,678.58 MW OE
AP00173847 000212 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 09/19/01 66,828.50 MW OH
AP00173848 005199 WILLEY&ASSOC DBA LASER LINE 09/19/01 109.95 MW OE Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173849 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 09/19/01 10,047.42 MW OH
AP00173850 002301 Y H CONSTRUCTION INC 09/19/01 1,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00173851 000371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 09/19/01 34.40 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/19/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11
WED, SEP 19, 2001, 3:53 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 54484 #S048 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173852 002115 ZENDEJAS, VICTORIA 09/19/01 28.00 ~ OH
AP00173853 001510 ZETTERBERG, BOB 09/19/01 30.18 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 3
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 943,741.07 Number of Checks Processed: 249
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T 0 T A L 943,741.07
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~NGINEI~I~ING DEPAI~TfflENT
StaffRepor
DATE; October 3,2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICES AT HERMOSA PARK
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to sign the subject Grant of Easenient.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
AT & T Wireless has installed a transmission tower in Hermosa Park, on the south side of Hamilton Street east of
Hermosa Avenue. Since the facility is located outside the public right-ofway, Southern California Edison requires an
easement to provide electric services to the facility. Their engineer has drafted a Grant of Easement for the City to
execute.
Res~.t fully submitted, .
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DB:ju
Attachments: Grant of Easement
Plat Map
THE CITY OF
[~AN CHO C UCAI~ O NGA
Staff Report
DATE: September 19, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O~eil, City Engineer
BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE EXCESS STREF?F RIGHT-OF-
WAY AT THE SO~ CORNt~ OF CENTER AVENUE AND 25m STREET, V-180
-APN: 209-104-10AND 11
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that thc City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering thc sununary
vacation of excess street right-of-way at the southwest corner of Center Avenue and 25t~ Street
and directing the City Clerk to present same to the County Recorder for recordation.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On September 26, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 00-29,
a request to establish a non-public school to serve special education, students in the Low
Residential (L) District at 10289 25th Street. One of the conditions of thc CUP 00-29 approval is
to vacate 10-foot wide gtrips of excess right-of-way along both 25th Street and Center Avenue
fronting the property. The vacated excess right-of-way will be incorporated into the project and
maintained by thc property owner.
On August 22, 2001, thc Planning Commission determined that said vacation is in conformance
with the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JS:dlw
Attachments
.25
Vicinity Map
WAy ?O..B£ VACATED,
N
City of Rancho Cucamonga
k'~
RESOLUTION NO. ~)/- 2/~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CENTER AVENUE AND 25TM
STREET
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highway Code, the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the excess right-
of-way at the southwest comer of the intersection of Center Avenue and 25t~ Street; and;
WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess right-of-
way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been used for more
than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its
order vacating the excess right-of-way at the southwest comer of the intersection of Center Avenue
and 25~ Street, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B".
'~SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits ·
to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bel-nardino County, California. ..
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption ofthis resolution,
and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
27
EXHIBIT "A" '
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR
VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
BEING A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 25~" STREET AND CENTER
AVENUE, ADJACENT TO BLOCK 59 OF THE NORTH. CUCAMONGA SUBDIVISION,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN
BOOK 4, PAGE 8 OF MAP BOOKS,'RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9 SAID BLOCK 59;
THENCE NORTH 00° 12' 00" WEST, 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF
CENTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP;
THENCE NORTH 89e50' 00~ WEST, 135.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF 25m
STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE WITH THE CENTERLINE OF A 20 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATED PER
'INSTRUMENT NO. 84-037057, RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1984, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS;
THENCE NORTH 00° 12' 00' WEST, 10.00 FEET ALONG THEPROLONGATION OF SAID
CENTERLINE TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT 1~30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL
WITH THE CENTERLINE OF 25m STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP;
THENCE SOUTH 89o50. 00' EAST; 137.07 FEET ALONG SAID LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 44°44' 20" EAST, tl.31 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS 30 FEET
WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF CENTER AVENUE AS SHOWN ON
SAID MAP;
THENCE SOUTH 00° 12' 00' EAST, 101.99 FEET ALONG SAID LINE;
THENCE NORTH 89D50' 60' WEST, 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2418.233 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.056 ACRES; MORE OR LESS.
THIS DESCRIPTION ALSO BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED 'EXHIBIT MAP" AND
THEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 7171
REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/03 i~:'/''~:
~. ,~m~..~;~ .~ ,?
Page 1 of 1
June 7, 2001
BY: R. Pisa
Ck'd BY: B. Fox
EXHIBIT
£XHIBIT MAP
FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
FO. I.P.,
25TH ST.
_ ~ __ (N s~'5o'oo' w)
-- ' -' I
N Og'~2'O0" W ~I
7.07
.... ~T
(N 89'~'00' W
LoT 12
II
LOT 10 00
VA~ ~ ~N~. ( ) D~O~ RECORD
N0.84-0}7057 O.R. ~TA P~ MB 4/8
OF C~ ¢ ~CHO
CU~ (~ ~ r~/I O~O~ VA~ON-OF
lo' ~ ~ ¢CL) R-O-W ~ C~
ACR~GE OF RIG~-OF-WAY
~ TO BE VA~ = 2,418.235 S.F.
, OR 0.056 ACRES ~. 1" I.P., TAG
Scale' 1" = 50' ~ I~
,~ · ~ ~. ;~ ~ (~9) 783-8~70 ·
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
~ NGIN ZE I~I N G DE DAI~TM g N T
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O~eil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA SENDA ROAD, WEST
OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SUBMITTED BY TOM COONS AND R1NDY COONS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk
to sign said agreement and causing the same to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The homeowners of 8181 La Senda Road requested a building permit for a 1,239 square foot
addition to their single-family residence. Installation of missing public improvements is a condition
of issuing the building permit. The City Code requires that all missing public improvements
adjacent to a property be completed upon issuance of a building permit. Mr. and Mrs. Coons,
homeowners, have submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to
guarantee the installation of said public improvements at a later date. Staff felt it was appropriate to
defer the improvements since La Senda Road is an unimproved road.
Re~_c~fully submitted,
Wik~l[idm j. O,Neil~''t~
City Engineer
Attachments
WJO:SH:dlw
CITY OF
~-.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tn~,:
ENGII~.~'~ING DIVISION F.,XI-rrRIT:
RESOLUTION NO. O/~ .2 ] ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM
TOM COONS AND RINDY COONS AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58
on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in
conjunction with building permit issuance; and
WHEREAS, installation of missing public improvements established as prerequisite to
issuance of building permit for 8181 La Senda Road has been met by entry into a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Tom Coons and Rindy Coons, and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the
City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County,
California.
THE CITY OF
{~AN CH 0 C~ CAH 0 N GA
emorandum
DATE: October 2, 2001
TO: Jack Lam, ~ICP, City Manag~-~,..
FROM: William J. 0 Nell, City Engin.ee.~
SUBJECT: City Council Agenda - Octo-'ber 3, 2001 - D-5 - APPROVAL OF
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND 2 FOR CUP 00-33, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
19TM STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST AVENUE AND HELLMAN
AVENUE, SUBMI'I-rED BY ALTA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Item D-5 on the City Council Agenda for October 3, 2001, the title should reflect the staff
report and read as follows:
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR CUP 00-33,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TM STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST AVENUE
AND HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY ALTA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
/dlw
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
$ ffRepor
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR CUP 00-33, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF 19TM STREET BETVVEEN AMETHYST AVENUE AND
HELLMAN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY ALTA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING
LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
CUP 00-33, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1
and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS
CUP 00-33 located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Avenue and
Hellman Avenue in the Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the
Planning Commission on January 10, 2001, for an 86 unit elderly care facility, on 2.91
acres of land.
The Developer, Alta Loma Assisted Living LLC, is submitting an agree~nent and security
to guarantee the construction of public improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Cash Deposit: $119,000.00
Labor and Material Cash Deposit: $ 59,500.00
Copies-of-theagreementand securities~areavailable-in the-City Cterk'sOff'me.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 00-33
October 3, 2001
Page 2
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:dlw
Attachments
Vicinity Map
City of Rancho Cucamonga
N
RESOLUTION NO. O ] - 2 / ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP 00-33
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement by Alta Loma Assisted Living LLC, A California Limited
Liability Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real
property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of 19~ Slxeet between
Amethyst Avenue and Hellman Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as CUP 00-33; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by
the City Attorney.
RESOLUTION NO. O/- 2/?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR CUP 00-33
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts");
and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the lew of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the 'l'e~f'o~-6-th~intenance Districts andmhave expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
d7
RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 00-33
October 3, 2001
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and ail of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are ail tree and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special ben~fit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improveme~its from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
Thc Owners of thc Property are:
Alta Loma Assisted Living LLC, A Limited Liability Company
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL "A":
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST ~ OF LOT 12, BLOCK 11 OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD
ASSOCIATION, 1N THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 46, RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST ~ OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE NORTH
00 DEG. 35' 08" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST ~ OF SAID LOT 12, A
DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 330.00 FEET OF SAID
EAST ½ OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 37' 19" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 194.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 22' 41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12, SAID POINT BEING
DISTANCT 193.63 FEET EASTERLY OF SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST ~ OF SAID
LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 37' 19" WESTALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE
OF 193.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. . · :
PARCEL "B":
THAT PORTION OF THE EAST ~ OF LOT 12, BLOCK 11 OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD
ASSOCIATION, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 46, RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LrNE OF LOT 12, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT
193.63 FEET EASTERLY OF TI-IE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST ½ OF SAID LOT 12;
THENCE ALONG NORTH 89 DEG. 37' 19" EAST FROM SAID POINT ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 194.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST 275.00
FEET OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG. 41' 18" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET OF SAID EAST ½ OF SAID LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 37' 19"
WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 193.09 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT
BEING DISTANT 194.82 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST ~ OF SAID
LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 22' 41" EAST FROM SAID POINT, A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNYNG.
Tills LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE,
CERTIFICATE NO. 503, RECORDED AUGUST 15,2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010369701, OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
EXHIBIT "A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTINCT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTKICT NOS. I AND 2
LOT ~2. eLK..
.~GA HC~.~D 1" = 100"
~.~ .~ ·
. .. ~ ~,
.
' ~; · l'
E~S 6-~-~
A~UE
--- ~O LOT UNE TO R~A~
..... LOT U~ ~ ~ R~O~D
: ~ N~ LOT UNE
~T F~ S~T PURP~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -~-
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
A-2_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA CUP 0~-3~ qO
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD # 1) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and 43.25 acres of
parks, which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated
with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the
parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's.
Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry
monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5
acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park, 6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the
Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175 acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park
located on 6th Street, west of Archibald.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street
lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district,
being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as
such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-
wide district.
· ~ The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial
"streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements'of streets dedicated to the City. . :
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002)
For Project: CUP 00-33
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 .... 2 ..........
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
LI ......... 12
*Existing items installed with original project.
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU S 1 L 1
86 86 43
B - 1 CUP 00-33
'7/
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for thc fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49
Family
Multi-
Unit 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96
Family
TOTAL $944,691.45
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 00-33) is:
86 Dwelling Units x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $3,965.03 Annual:Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l.and lI~e Ilnit Tv.ne Ilnit~q Ilnitq Factor llnit~q Unit Revenue
Single Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00
Family
Multi-
Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00
Family
Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060.00
TOTAL $483,560.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (CUP 00-33) is:
86 Dwelling Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $L528.22 AnnuakAssessment
C -1 CUP 00-33 17/2,
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
'E NGIN I~I~I~IN G D I~ PA I~T ~II~ N T
Staff Report
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. 02qeil, City Engineer
BY: Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR CUP 99-17, LOCATED AT 8248 19TM STREET, WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET
(CCWD WELL NO. 24)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving CUP 99-17, accepting the
subject a~r~ement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
CUP 99-17, located at 8248 19t~ Street (CCWD Well No. 24) west of Sapphire Street in the Flood Control
Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 8, 2000 for the development o£ a
monopole on 3.34 acres of land owned by CCWD, (CCWD Well Site No. 24).
The Developer, Verizon Wireless, is submitting an agreement and cash security to guarantee the construction
of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Cash: $10,400.00
Labor and Material Cash: $ 5,200.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office.
Resp$~l~lly submitted, ·
Willia/WJ. O'Neil
City Engineer
Attachments
WJO:Y_C :dlw_ __ __
CITY OF ITEM= fnt. JP
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' TITLE: VItAlITY Mt:tg~
EDIGINEERIIqG DIVISION EXHIBIT:
RESOLUTION NO. 0 ]
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP 99-17
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement by Los Angeles SMSA Limited Parmership, dba Verizon
Wireless by AirTouch Cellular as developer, for the improvement of public fight-of-way adjacent to
the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 8248 Nineteenth Street,
(CCWD Well No. 24) westerly of Sapphire Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as CUP 99-17; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is a~pproved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of ~aid City
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by
the City Attorney.
/-/5
R A N C H O C U C a M 0 N G a
E i~ GIN E E QIN G DE DAD TIslE NT
StaffR
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O2qeil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FOR DRC 2001-00273, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA
SENDA ROAD, WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SUBMITTED BY RICHARD A.
WATSON AND ANDREA D. WATSON
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk
to sign said agreement and causing the same to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
DRC 2001-00273 was approved by the City Planner on August 7, 2001 for the construction of a
singe family residence on the south side of La Senda Road west of Sapphire Street. Staff felt it was
appropriate to defer the improvements since La Senda Road is an unimproved road; therefore, the
project was conditioned to submit a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to
guarantee the installation of said public improvements at a later date. Mr. and Mrs. Watson are
submitting this agreement to comply with their conditions of approval.
Re(~tfully submitted,
?.il il m .s. o q¢il
City-Engineer
Attachments
WJO:SH:dlw
CITY OF
RANCHO
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM
RICHARD A. WATSON AND ANDREA D. WATSON AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE
SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cueamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58
on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in
conjunction with building permit issuance; and
WHEREAS, installation of missing public improvements established as prerequisite to
issuance of building permit for DRC 2001-00273 (8207 La Senda Road) has been met by entry into a
Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Richard A. Watson and Andrea D.
Watson, and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept ~aid Real Property Improvement
Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the Cit3; Clerk to sign same, and directs the
City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Re~order of San Bemardino County,
California.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Stlgf Report
DAIE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jer~ A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~J')n
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techhicia
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $262,609.27
($238,735.70 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER,
SlLVIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
AMETHYST AVENUE PAVEMENT OVERLAY FROM HIGHLAND :AVENUE TO
WILSON AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT
NO. 11763035650/1158176-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $262,609.27 ($238,735.70 plus 10% contingency) to
the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc., for the construction of the Amethyst Avenue
Pavement Overlay from Highland Avenue to Wilson Avenue, to be funded from Measure I
funds, Account No. 11763035650/1158176-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 11, 2001,
for the subject project. The EngineePs estimate was $253,658.50. Staff has reviewed all bids
received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any
irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation
and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
R~,:ff, ully submitted, t
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
r i RANCHO ·
I lb; -~'~s°Nl~v~ II .' WILSON A'
I HLN~D AVE
"~ ~AR~
~ASEUN£ I~ ~
i ==~==10500 CM~
~ 0
i 4THST
I _ CITY OF _P~NCHO_ CUCAMONGA
~. AMETHYST STREET
PAVEMENT OVERLAY
FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO WILSON AVENUE
· VICINITY MAP
BID SUMMAI ~¥ FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 a~,~'.~n~lvrrowzworR
METHYST / NENUE PAVEMENT OVERLAY FROM ENGINEERS COST Sflvia Construction,
HIGHLAND AVENUE TO WILSON AVENUE I~STIMATE Inc. R.J. Noble Company All American Asphalt
UNIT BID UNIT UNIT UNIT BID
qO OTb UNIT OESURIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. LS Elea6ngand Gmbbinginc. excava6on and mobilization $10,745.00 $10,745.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,800.00 $15,800.00 $17,800.00 $17,800.00
2 1244{ SY Cold Plane inc. delivering grindings to City Yard $1.50: $18,660.00 $0.801 $9,952.00 $1.18 $14,679.20 $1.04i $12,937.60
3. 260( TON 0.15' Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix- Gap Graded Overlay with Rocl~ $60.00 $156,000.00 $54.00 $140,400.00 $55.00 $143,000.0(1 $59.91 $155,766.0(1
Dust
4. 3s, SF Construct PCC drive approach inc, removals $5.50 $2,112.00 $5,00 $1.920.00 $6,~5 $2,515.2(3 $3,93 $1,509.12
5. 521 SF Construct 6" PCC driveway inc. removals $5.00 $2,630.00 $6.50 $3,419.00 $6.30 $3,313.8/3 $5.90 $3,103.4C
6. Is~ LF Construct 8" Curb and 24" Guttor $18.00 $3,29'~.00 $21.00 $3,843.00 $17.25 $3,156.75 $16.30 $2,982.90
7. 16191 SF 4" PCC Sidewalk including removals $3.50 $5,666.50 $4.30 S6,961.70 $4.00 $6,476.0C $3.94 $6,378.86
8. 780 SF PUC Wheel Chair Ramp $6.00 $4,680.00 $4.30 $3,354.00 $12.35 $9,633.00 $3.98 $3,104.40
0. 76 LF PUC Splash Curbs $25.00 $1,900.00 $20.00 $1,520.00 $41.00 $3,116.00 $8.80 $668.80
I0. 269 SF Rockscape $9.00 $2,421.00 $24.00 $6,456.00 $24.O(1 $6,456.00 $16.30 $4,384.70
I I.74 TON Crushed Aggregate Base $25.00 $1,850.00 $60.00 $4,440.0(1 $47.00 $3',478.00 $82.00 $6,068.00
12. 3000 si: Asphalt Concrete Pavement $2.0(1 $6,000.00 $1.90 $5,700.0(1 $1.27 $3,810.00 $2.52 $7,560.00
13. so E~. kdjust Valve Can and Cover to Finish Grade $75.00 $3,750.0(3 $40.00 $2,000.0(1 $45.00 $2,250.00 $141.00 $7,050.00
14. EA ~.djust WM Box to Grade $200.00 $~00..0(1 $220.00 $220.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $61.50 $61.50
IS 2 EA Relocate MB $175.00 $~50.0C $535.00' $1,070.00 $400.00 $800.00 $126.00 $252.00
16 EA Relocato Sign $200.00 .$b00'.0E $160.00 $160.00 $100.00 $100.00 $94.00 $94.0(1
I? 22 EA ~.djust MH to Grade $260.00 $5,720.00 $210.00 $4,620.00 $210.00 $4,620.00 $356.00 $7,832.0~3
IS 690 SF Consm~ct PCC Spandrel with dowels $12.00 $8,280.00 $10.00 $6,900.00 $8.00 $5,520.00 $14.50 $10,005.00
19. LS Restore Landscaping and Inigation $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $1,940.00 $1,940.00
2o. LS ['raffic Contxol $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.0(1 $3,300.00 $3,300.00
~1. LS ;igning, Striping, Markings, and Markers $8,200.00 $8,200.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.0C $5,800.00 $5,800.00
~ TOTAL $253,658.50 $238,735.70 $251,423.95 $258,898.38
Page 1
BID S~MMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 11, 2001
I
AMETHYST AVENUE PAVEMENT OVERLAY FROM Laird ~onstruction
HIGHLAND AVENUE TO WILSON AVENUE Co. Inc. Vance Corporation C~entry Brothers~ Inc.
I UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO OTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I. ILS Clearing and Cnubbing inc. excavation and mobiliza6on $18,725.00 $18,725.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00
2. 12440 [ sY Cold Plane inc. delivering grindings to City Yard $1.25 $15,550.00 $1.40 $17,416.00 $2.00 $24,880.00
s. 2~us iTON 0.15' Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix- Gap Graded Overlay with Rock Dust $55.00 $143,000.00 $53.00 $137,800.0(] $55.00 $143,000.00
4. 3~4 I SF Construct PCC drive approach inc. removals $6.00 $2,304.00 $7.00 $2,688.~)(] $4.75 $1,824.00
s. s26 [ SF Construct 6" PCC driveway inc. ~movals $6.00 $3,156.00 $7.00 $3,682.0/3 $5.00 $2,630.00
6. Iss ] LF Construct 8" Curb and 24" Gutter $25.00 $4,575.00 $21.00 $3,843.0(] $22.00 $4,026.00
7. 1619 [ SF 4" PCC Sidewalk includnigremovals $3.50 $5,666.50 $3.25 $8,499.75 $4.75 $7,690.25
8. 780 [ SF PCC Wheel Chair Ramp $12.50 $9,750.00 $5.00 $3,900.0(] $4.50 $3,510.00
9. ?a L~ PCC Splash Curbs $50.00 $3,800.00 $48.00 $3,648.0C $20.00 $1,520.00
1o. 269 SF Rockzcap¢ $27.50 $7,397.50 $27.00 $7,263.0~ $10.00 $2,690.00
11. 74 TON CroShedAggregateBa~e $50.00 $3,700.00 $21.00 $1,554.00 $30.00 . $:2,220.00
12. 30us I SF Asphalt Concrete Pavement $2.00 $6,000.00 $1.00 $3,000.0C $1.50 $4,500.00
13. so lEA Adjust Valve Can and Cover to Finish Grade $100.00 $5,000.00 $80.00 $4,000.00 $20.00 $1,000.00
14, [FA Adjust WM Box to Grade $25~.001 $250.00 $150.00 $150.00 '$50.00 $50.00
18 2 lEA Relocate MB $200.00 . $400.00 $275.00 $550.00 $100.00 $200.0(~
la !FA Relocate Sign $100.00 $100.00 $106.00 $106.00 $150.00 $150.00
17 22 IFA Adjust lvlH to Grade $225.00 $4,950.00 $215.00 $4,730.00 $200.00 $4,400.0~
is. 6~o I SF Construct PCC Spandrel w/th dowels $10.00 $6,900.00 $13.00 $8,970.00 $10.00 . $6,900.00
19. LS Restore Landscaping and Indgation $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
20. ~ LS Traffic ConSol $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $23,500.00 $23,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
21. i LS Signing, Striping, Markings, and Markers $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,200.00 $8,200.00
~ TOTAl $2S8,724.00 $263,099,7S $272,890.25
Page 2 I
R A N C h O C U C a M O N G A
~NGINEEI~ING D~:PAI~T~IE NT
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
/__
BY: Karen UcGuire-Emery, Senior Park Plan .r1~L/. ~(~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician '~'"
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND
AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT
OF $572,534.60 ($520,486.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO THE
APPARENT I~OW BIDDER, THOMSEN LANDSCAPE',. FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE HERITAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION,
TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 120, PARK DEVELOPMENT FUNDS,
ACCOUNT NO. 11203055650/1203120-0 AND APPROPRIATE 'FUNDS
FROM FUND 120, PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND BALANCE TO
ACCOUNT NO. 11203055650/1203120-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council re-appropriate the necessary funds from Fund 120,
Park Development Fund Balance to Account No. 11203055650/1203120-0, accept the bids
received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of
$572,534.60 ($520,486.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Thomsen
Landscape, for the construction of the Heritage Park Tot Lot Renovation Project, to be
funded from Fund 120, Park Development funds, Account No. 11203055650/1203120-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On June 5, 2001 bids were solicited for the Heritage Park Tot Lot Renovation Project,
however, only one bid was received. Per Council direction, staff rejected the bid and
solicited new bids for the project. On September 11,2001, bids were received and opened
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
HERITAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION
October 3, 2001
Page 2
for the subject project. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete
and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential.
Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the
requirements of the bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:KMF_/RO:Is
Attachment
$
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 APPARgNTLOWSti)OEIt
HERITAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION ENGII~ERS COS?
PROJECT ESTIMATE Thomsen Landscape Vido Samarzich, Inc.
I UNIT UNIT BID CORRECTED UNIT
N(] OTY ~NIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
I ILS Mohili~antlnn $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00! $10,000.0(3
2 LS Demo (Remove Concrete Paving, Wood Log) $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.0C
3 283 C¥ Remove Existing Sand ( Sto~knile for City Use} $12.00 $3,396.00 $25.00 $7,075.00 $7,075.00 $8.00 $2,264.00'
4 93~ SF Rough Gr~di~E./Soil Preparnti~n!Fine Grading $0.65 $6,084.00 $1.00 $9,360.00 $9,360.00 $1.00 $9,360.00
~ 3~$ I LF 4" A.B.S. Drain Line $8.50 $3,272.50 $8.00 $3,080.0~ $3,080.00 $15.00 $5,775.00
~ 123 I L~ 6'A.B.8. Drain Line $10.00 $1,250.00 $10.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $20.00 $2,500.00
7 10o I LF 8"A.B.S. Drain Line $16.00 $1,600.00 $15.00 $1,500.0~ $1,500.00 $35.00 $3,500.00
8 D I EA 6" Area Drain $40.00 $520.00 $34.62 $450.00! $450.00 $350.00 · $4,550.00
~ I EA 12" Area Drain $75.00 $150.00 $125.00 $250.00 $250.00 $600.00 $1,200.00
lo , EA 18" Catch Basin $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
11 I45 , SF Concrete Stairs $8.00 $1,160.00 $30.00 $4,350.00 $4,350.00 $35.00 $5,075.00
12 435 I LF Concrete Mows~xip/l~dlng/Curb $8.50 $3,697.50 $16.00 $6,960.00 $6,960.00 $10.00 $4,350.00
13 3o8t I SF Concrete Paving-Med Broom Finish $2.25 $6,943.50 $5.00 $15,430.00 $15,430.00 $6.00 $18,516.00
~4 $~4 ! SF Concrete Pav/ng-Undcr Rubber Surfn~inE $2.50 $13,035.00 $3.51 $18,300.00 $18,300.00 $5.00 $26,070.00
~f it . LF 12" High Concrete Bench/step $18.00 $1,008.00 $70.00 $3,920.00 S3,920.00 $70.00 $3,920.00
1~ 4~ I LF 18" High Seat Wall W/ Brick Cap $45.00 $20,700.0/] $60.00 $27,600.00 $27,600.0/~ $70.00 $32,200.00
17 622 I L~ Temporary Fenc/ng $2.00 $1,244.00 $4.00 $2,488.00 $2,488.0~ $2.00 $1,244.00
1~ { iA Overhead Structarea $22,000.00 $44,000.00 $20,300.00 $40,600.00 $40,600.0~ $25,000.00 $50,000.00
1~ 2¢ I EA Palm Tree $40.00 $800.0~ $1,500.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.0(3 $600.00 $12,000.00
20. ! EA 24" Box Tree $210.00 $1,050.0/3 $250.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.0C $600.00 $3,000.00
21. 1o2 ' EA I Gal. Shrub $7.00 $714.0/] $10.00 $1,020.00 $1,020.0~ $10.00 $1,020.00
22. ac £A 5 Gal. Shrub $17.00 $1,360.0~ $30.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $15.00 .$1,200.00
23. 73~ sF 4" Shredded Mulch $0.25 $182.5C $0.60 $438.00 $438.00 $1.00 $730.00
24. 73( SF ~utOnnatie IrrlgaHnn System {New Area) $1.45 $1,058.50 S15.60 $11,388.00 $11,388.00 ' $3.00 $2,190.00
2S. SOO( , SF iAutamnfi~ Irrigation System (Renovation Area) $1.65 $13,200.00 $0.20 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2.0(3 $16,000.0~
26. 873( I SF !30 Day Mainte~ance Period $0.08 $698.40 $0.14 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $0.12 $1,047.6~
27. I ts Play Equipment (Ocean Area) $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $63,200.00 $63,200.00 $63,200.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.0~3
28. ILS ~lay Eqnipm~t (Mountain Area} $42,000.00 $42,000.00 $51,800.00 $51,800.00 $51,800.00 $55,000.0~3 $55,000.0C
~9' ILS ~lay F_~uipment {Desert Area) $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $43,950.00 $43,950.00 $43,950.00 $46,000.0C $46,000.001
~o.I £A Concrete P/chic Table $700.00 $3,500.00 $900.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,500.0~ $7,500.00
31. } EA D~/nl~inE FO~!ntmn $2,400.00 $4,800.00 $3,200.00{ $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $3,200.00 $6,400.00
32. I EA Trash Receptacle $700.00 $5,600.00 $500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $500.00 $4,000.00
33. $! { £A ~oulder (Relocate) $200.00 $11,000.00 $100.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $85.00 $4,675.00
34. 1481l] ~ Play Sand $54.00 $7,992.00 $97.30 $14,400.00 $14,400.00 $1 la.00 $17,020.00
35. 142 Hnndr/t/I $18~50 $2,627.00 $90.00 $12,780.00 $12,780.00 $75.00 $10,650.00
36. I I EA Concrete Asnlms~l 0yhale) $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
~7. ! I EA Concrete nnlmnl (Porpoise) $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $1,225.00 $1,225.00 $1,225.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00
38. 2 { EA Concrete An/ma1 {Beal-) $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $4,200.00 $8,400.0~ $8,400.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00
39. I I EA Concrete A9imnl {Turtle} $800.00 $800.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.0~ $1,000.00 $1,175.00 $1,175.00
40. 7328 I SF Havdicn~n Accessible Rubber Surfacing $11.00 $80,608.00 $11.50 $84,272.00 $84,272.0~ $11.76 $86,177.28
I
I TOTAL $395,450.90 $520,635.00 $520,486.01] $548,108.88
Page I
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER I1, 2001
Ecology Construction, Adams / Mallory
HE~ ]TAGE PARK TOT LOT RENOVATION PROJECT Inc. Construction, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
NO (~T'I UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
i. 13 Mobilization $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $57,538.00 $57,538.00
2. II LS Demo (Remove Concrete Paving, Wood Log) $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $21,113.00 $21,113.00
3. 2s3 CY Remove Existing Sand ( Stockpile for City Usc) $10.00 $2,830.0~ $10.00 $2,830.00
4. 93~0 SF Rough Grading/Soil Preparation/Fine Grading $0.03 $280.8~ $0.90 $8,424.00
5. 385 LF 4" A.B.S. Drain Line $6.00 $2,310.0~3 $13.60 ' $5,236.00
6. 125 LF 6" A.B.S. Drain Linc $8.00 $1,000.0fl $14.80 $1,850.00
7. 10o LF 8" A.B.S. Drain Line $9.00 $900.0~ $18.00 $1,800.00
s. ~3 EA 6" Area Drain · $100.00 $1,300.0C $513.00 $6,669.00
~. 2 EA 12" Area Drain $120.00 $240.0C $742.00 $1,484.00
1o. I EA 18" Catch Basin $300.00 $300.0C $1,084.00 $1,084.00
Il. 145 SF Concrete Stairs $30.00 $4,350.0C $40.00 $5,800.00
12. 435 LF Concrete Mowstrip/Banding/Curb $40.00 $17,400.00[ $12.60 $5,481.00
13. 3086 SF Concrete Paving-Med Broom Finish $3.50 $10,801.001 $5.00 $15,430.00
14. 5214 SF Concrete Paving-Under Rubber Surfadng $7.00 $36,498.00! $6.00 $3 1,284.00
15. 56 LF 12" High Concrete Bench/step $108.00 $6,048.00 $434.00 $24,304.00
16. 4~o LF 18" High Seat Wall W/Brick Cap $80.00 $36,800.00 $125.00 $57,500.00
~?. 622 LF Temporary Fencing $1.00 $622.00 $2.00 $1,244.00
Is. 2 EA Overhead S~xuctures $23,000.00 $46,000.00 $30,654.00 $61,308.00
19. 20 ~A Palm Tree $1,500.00 $30,000.00 $685.00 $13,700.00
2o. 5 EA 24" Box Tree $230.00 $1,150.00 $325.06 $1,625.00
21. 102 EA I Gal. Shrub $7.00 $714.00 $12.00 $1,224.00
22. 80 EA 5 Gal. Shrub $17.00 $1,360.00 $17.00~ $1,360.0(3
23. 73o SF 4" Shredded Mulch $1.00 $730.00 $1.50 $1,095.00
24. ?30 si: Automatic Irrigation System {New Area) $6.00 $4,380.00 $7.00 $5,110.0~
25. 8e~o SF Automatic Irrigation System {Renovation Area) $6.50 $4,000.00 · $1.70 $13,600.0~
26 8730 S~ 30 Day Maintenance Period $0.06 $523.80 $6.10 $873.0(~
27 LS Play F~uipment (Ocean Area) $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $64,500.00 $64,500.0C
2s LS Play Equipment {Mountain Area) $56;000.00 $56,000.00 $52,000.00 $52,000.00
29 LS Play Equipment (Desert Area} $49,000.0(3 $49,000.00 $42,450.00 $42,450.00
3o 3 I~A Concrete Picnic Table ' $1,350.00 $6,750.00 $856.00 $4,280.00
31 2 ~A Drinldng Fountain $4,500.00 ! $9,000.00 $6,562.00 $13,124.00
32 ~A Trash Receptacle $550.00' $4,400.00 $550.00 $4,400.00
33 I5 EA Boulder (Relocate) $200.00 $11,000.00 $108.00 $5,940.00
34 148 CY ;play Sand $120.00 $17,760.00 $22.00 $3,256.00
33 142 [P ~andrail $100.00 $14,200.00 $108.00 $15,336.00
3~ EA ~oncrete Animal (Whale) $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,564.00 $3,564.00
37 EA Concrete Animal (Porpoise) $1,500.00 $1,500,.00 $2,503.00 $2,503.O0
3S EA ~.oncrete Animal (Bear) $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00
39 £A ~oncrete Animal (Turtie) $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,134.00 $2,134.00
40 7328 SF Handicap Accessible Rubber Surfacing $11.00 $80,608.00 $11.50 $84,272.00
ro~a. $548,755.60 $656,725.00
Page 2
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~ N C IN E ~I~I N G D E DAI~ T~ E N T
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician-~?~-/
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $180,412.10 ($164,011.00 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, LAMBCO ENGINEERING,
INC., FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS, TO BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES FUNDS, ACCOUNT
NO. 10013035300
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $180,412.00 ($164,011.00 plus 10% contingency) to the
apparent Iow bidder, Lambco Engineering, Inc., for the Installation of Fiber Optic Cabling at Various
Locations, to be funded from Contract Sen/ices funds, Account No. I0013035300.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 18, 2001, for
the subject project. An Engineer's estimate was not prepared. However, staff and the City's fiber
optic consultant, IKON, has reviewed the bid submitted by Lambco Engineering and finds it to be
acceptable. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance
with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the
required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
Respectfully submitted,
W
City'Engineer
WJO:MP/RO:Is
Attachments
53'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
LOCATION &VICINTY MAP
Base Line Road
LIBRARY
~) -~
E 1' = 2ooo'
FIRE
STATION
San Be nardino Road ~.
Foothill Boulevard
CITY
HALLI
_?row
SENIOR
9th Street CENTER
YARD
....... Indicates Fiber Optic Cabling Route
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 ArJ,.~Re, vrrowzwoes
FIBER OPTIC CABLING INSTALLATION EN~iN~ZRS COST
ESTIMATE t~mbCO Engineering, Inc.
UNIT BID UNIT BID CORRECTED
NO OTY UNiT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT
1. '100 LF Existing Pull Box to Service Bay Including Rew~v~ & R~place g~ PCC " $130.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00
2. 16o LF Furnish & Install 2" EMT Raceway From Set'ce Bay to Telephon~
Sendce Room at CiW Hall $61.00 $9,760.00 $9,760.00
3. 65 LF Finnish & Install 2" Schd. 40 PVC Conduit From Existing Pull Box to
Bcilding at Fire Satlon 2 ' · $60.00 $3,900.00 $3,900.00
?umish & lmtall 2" Scl~ 40 Rigid Conduit From 2" PVC Conduit to
,:4. 713 LF relephoneEquipmentRoomatFimStatioa2 $33.00 $2,310.00 $2,310.00
5. 15 LF ~.~sh & Install 2" EMT Conduit From 2" Rigid Conduit to Frame in
Felephone Equipment Room at Fire Station 2 $33.00 $495.00 $495.00
6. 85 LF :he Riser Room Including 4" PCC SidewaLk Remove & Replace at $55.00 $4,675.00 $4,675.00
7. 10 LF Telephone Equipment Room Including 4" AC Pavement Remove & $470.00 $4,700.00 $4,700.00
t'umasll & nsta~] :fi ~[ .o ~'vc l"mm t:x~t Full t~ox to t~lag, inc.
8. 30 LF Fabrication & Insulation of Extension Box to Exist. Exterior Wall Box $110.01~ $3,300.00 $3,300.00
9. 10 CF Fm'nish & Install 2' EMT Conduit From Existing Wall Box to Telephone
Equipment Room at City Yard $33.00 $330.00 $330.00
10. 3 EA F~h & Install 2 x 3 Pull Box Including AC Pavement Repair $1,350.00 $4,050.00 $4,050.00
11. 2 EA Fumish&Install3xSPullBoxlncludingAC'PavementRepuit $2,550.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00
12. 20550 LF Install Fumishnd 96 Strand F~m~r Optic Cable Including Field Splices &
Coilud Spare Cable ............ $1.82 $37,500.00 $37,401.00
13. 7000 LF Funlish & Install 12 Strand F?oer Optic Cable including Field Splices &
Coiled Spare Cable ' $3.57 $24,990.00 $24,990.00:
14, 1 La Furaish & lnstaIlComplete Rack Em:los,tv Including Termination of
F~er optic Cable in Servi~e Bay at City HUll $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.0C
15. ES Fumuih & Install Complete Rack Enclosure Including Termination of
Fiber Optic Cable lletween Service Bay & Computer Room at Ctiy Hall $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.012
16. LS ?~¢r optic Cable at Fhe Station 2 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0{~
17. 1 LS :~,~h & I.:ta~ Co,,~.~,to Reck E.c~os~ ~.d.dlng X~.,~natio. o~
?i~r Optic Cable at L~ra~ $5,000.00 $5,000.0(~ $5,000.00
18. 1 LS IF~i~h & l~tall Complete Reck Enclosure Including Termination of
Fiher optic Cable at S~nior Center $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
19, I La Furaish & Install Complete Rack Enclosure Including Termination of
Fiber optic Cable at Cily Yard $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
TOTAl $164~110.00 $164~011.00
~ Page 1 ]
R A N C H O C U O A M O N G A
l~ NGIN E EDI N G D~ DAI~TH E N T
$ Repon
DA'~-: October 3, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer/Project Manage~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM CHURCH STREET TO SPRUCE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-
036 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $2,550.18 TO ACCOUNT NO.
11823035650/1326182-0 FROM TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUNDS, RELEASE THE
BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND'AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO
FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF
$78,856.08 '.~
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the Terra Vista Parkway Pavement
Rehabilitation from Church Street to Spruce Avenue, Contract No. 01-036 as complete, approve to
appropriate $2,550.18 to Account No. 11823035650/1326182-0 from Traffic Congestion Relief funds,
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithf:ul
Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of: $69,369.00 six
months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the
retention in the amount of $7,885.61, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of
$78,856.08.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $78,856.08,
which included one contract change order resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 13.68%.
The original amount approved by Council was $76,305.90 ($69,369.00 plus 10%).
Resj3e~ully submitted,
Willi~ J. O'Neil
City Engineer
-WJO:LH/RO:Is
Attachment
TERRA VISTA PARKWAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
(FROM CHURCH STREET TO SPRUCE AVENUE)
.: ~",T' ............... ~ // r:'~
i -~ ---~~~------~-Zt ..~.__J. 24~ ~ , '.
'-__~ ~,,,~qF~I~Z~... ~'~~~
VICINITY MAP
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
TERRA VISTA PARKWAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
CHURCH STREET TO SPRUCE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-
036 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Terra Vista Parkway Pavement Rehabilitation from
Church Street to Spruce Avenue, Contract No. 01-036, has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
~ ^ N C h 0 C U C a ~ 0 N G a
ENGINEEI~ING DE PAI~T~ENT
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer/Project Manager-~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician -~ '
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF FY 2000/2001 LOCAL STREET
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (SLURRY SEAL) AND PARKING LOT
RESURFACING (SEAL COAT) VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO.
01-038 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL TO,~APPROPRIATE $14,838.35 TO
ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1022176~0' FROM MEASURE I FUND
BAL'ANCE AND $14,838.35 TO ACCOUNT 11343035650/1000134-0 FROM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 FUND BALANCE,
RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $538,291.17
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the FY 2000/2001 Local
Street Pavement Rehabilitation (Slurry Seal) and Parking Lot Resurfacing (Seal Coat)
Various Locations, Contract No. 01-038 as complete, approve to appropriate $14,838.35 to
Account No. 11763035650/1022176-0 from Measure I fund balance and $14,838.35 to
Account No. 11343035650/1000134-0 from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 fund
balance, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance
Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and
Materials Bond in the amount of $498,004.70 six months after the recordation of said notice
if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of
$53,829.12, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of
$538,291.17.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
FY 2000/2001 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (SLURRY SEAL) AND
PARKING LOT RESURFACING (SEAL COAT)
October 3, 2001
Page 2
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based
on project documentation, is $538,291.17, which included one contract change order
resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 8.09%. The original amount
approved by Council was $547,805.17 ($498,004.70 plus 10%).
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:LH/RO:Is
Attachments ,
LOCATION. MAP
PIO-E~iOR ~R
2000/01 PAYMENT RE~IHTATION[ /i
SLURRY SE~L
RESOLUTION NO. O/- ZZ,.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FY
2000/2001 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
(SLURRY SEAL) AND PARKING LOT RESURFACING (SEAL
COAT) VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 01-038 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the FY 2000/2001 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation
(Slurry Seal) and Parking Lot Resurfacing (Seal Coat) Various Locations, Contract No.
01-038, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County. :.
ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~'~)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO
ELIMINATE A PORTION OF 7TM STREET, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. Hogle/Ireland, Inc. has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No.
00-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced General Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing
the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 01-55, thereby recommending that
the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment No. 00-04.
3. On the 19th'day of September 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded
said hearing on that day.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented te this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on September 19, 2001, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located with the City; and
b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the
adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
GPA 00-04 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC.
September 19, 2001
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This ordinance does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development; and
b. This ordinance does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;
and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the General
Plan; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment
and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Monitoring
Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State
CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and
the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council;
and further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said
Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant
environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have
been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project
that are listed below as conditions of approval.
1) If the City Council determines, through the approval
process for said General Plan amendment, that the
elimination of this portion of 7th Street is justified, this
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
GPA 00-04 - HOGLE/IRELAND, INC.
September 19, 2001
Page 3
developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and
construct a cul-de-sac terminus.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California
code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: in considering the record as a
whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the
substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports
and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing,
the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section
753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No.
00-04 by the adoption of the attached City Council Resolution.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
~ECE;[VED: lO- l- 1; 10:14AU; 916 327 2643 => R CUCAMONP~A COM DEV; 82
OCT-F]I-2~I 11:05 HCD 916 ~ 2~3 P.~/~J
DEPAR~ OF HOUS~G ~ CO~ DE~LO~
/~s~ s~ ~Div~i°n of Ho~g PoU~ Develop~t ~
September 27, 2001
Mr. Brad Bullet, City Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonsa
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
Dear Mr. Bailer:.
al~: Review of City of Rancho Cucamonp's Revised Draft Housing Element Amendment
Thank you for submitting revisions to thc City's draft housing element on June 7, July 18,
September 6, 2001. As you know, we ar~ rexluired to review drat ho..i.~ elements and mpon our
findings to thc Io~ali~ pursuant to Govmmment Code Section 65555(b). Mr. Lar~ Henderson,
Principal Planner. and Mr. Tom Gral~ Associale Pl.--er, through telephone conversations and
facsimiles, facilitated our review.
The draft housing element, includinlt revisions, adecluatel~ eddress the statutory requirements identified
in our August I0, 2001 review. Therefore, we are pleased to find Rancho Cucamonga's draft housing
element revision meets all the statutory requh~enls of State hon.~ing element law (Arti¢lo' 10.6 of the
Government Code). The element will be in full compliance with thc law when adopted and submitted
to this Department for review, pursuant to Government Code Section
Rancho Cucamenga and its plarming staff are to be commollded for their commltmelll to preporing a
housing e]~-nent in compliance with State law and maint~inln~ and increasln~ the co,.-,unity's supply
of affordable hOn.~ing. We wiflh you ~llg¢~,s in the implementation of Rancho Cucamonga's housing
element and we apprecia~ ~he courtesy and essistauc~ provided by your staff during the cour~ of our
review. It' we can provide any additional assistance, plea~ feel ~ to contact Olen Campora at
(916) 327-2640.
In accordance with the Public Records Act. a copy of this letter has b~ forwarded to thv individuals
alld or~o~ni?ations listed below.
Sincerely,
Deputy Director
cc: L~'y Hende~on, City of R~ncho Cuc~monl~
Tom ~
~k Stirs, S~ Commi~ on ~g & Comm~W Dcv~opm~t
Ca~c Y~I, S~is~ Dcp~ A~m~ ~ AG's O~ce
T~ ~b~ ~v~'s 0~ ofP~g ~ R~h
~berley ~!liu~, CaUfo~ B~ ~us~ ~iafion
M~ia Salkln; C~o~a ~fiOn of ~tom
~ Bro~ C~if~ R~ ~ ~is~c Fo~da6~
Rob W~n~, C~fo~ Co~fi~
Jo~ Dou~. ~, ~e pl.~in~ C~
D~ Sc~, W~ C~t~ on ~ ~ Pov~
~cx~ Abb~ A~m~ a Mw
lo~ Ro~ c~a
DaSd ~h~, ~o~a Ho~g
lo~ ~w~, A~om~
~ ~a ~. C~a S~ U~v~iF, Po~
~ ~ ~fo~a ~i~on of~m~
M~te Ba~. B~ick
~ T~, ~.nd Co~fi~ ~g~ S~c~
TOTCL P. 03
THE CITY OF ~
I~AN C Il 0 CUCAPIONGA
Staff rt
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of Rancho Cucamonga
has completed the Draft City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update. The
Project Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000
acres) as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is
located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations
as well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements the City's
General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of
approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non-
residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is
reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres. Within
the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential
uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the
implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e.,
future) development would occur with buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling
units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately
52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and
approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The Project/Planning Area
includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to the north. The
City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west
of downtown San Bernardino. The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the
north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to
the west, south and east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is
approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is
approximately 7,700 acres. Total project/planning area comprises approximately
31,700 acres. During these public hearings the City Council will consider the
Final EIR and proposed statements of overriding considerations. Certification of
the Final EIR and final action on the General Plan Update will occur after the
close of the public hearings.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 3, 2001
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the
General Plan Update and EIR. Consider any additional public comment and give direction as
needed. This application and all applicable environmental documents will be brought back for
final public hearing at the City Council meeting on October 17, 2001.
BACKGROUND:
General Plan Task Force and Plannin.q Commission Action: On July 2, 2001, the General Plan
Task Fome reviewed these documents and unanimously recommended that they be forwarded
for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. On August 8, September 12,
2001, and September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission considered the General Plan Update
and Draft EIR (including Response to Comments and Mitigation Plan).
Environmental Determination: The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is intended to
serve as an informational document for public agency decision-makers and the general public
regarding the objectives and components of the proposed project. This document addresses
the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with buildout of
the proposed General Plan, as well as, identifies feasible mitigation measures and alternatives
that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts. This EIR is the primary reference
document for the formulation and implementation of a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the
proposed General Plan.
The intent of this EIR is to provide a Program EIR that evaluates the broad-scale impacts of the
General Plan. A Program EIR is considered a "first-tier" document (California CEQA guidelines,
Section 15152). "Second-tier" documents, such as Project EIRs, Focused EIRs, or Mitigated
Negative Declarations, typically follow and evaluate the impacts of a single activity undertaken
to implement the plan.
On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR for the General Plan Update was released for the 45-day
review period, which ended on August 6, 2001. The EIR and General Plan Task Force staff
report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001.
The Final EIR (including the Response to Comments) has been included for review by the City
Council.
Draft General Plan Update: The proposed project is the update of the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan. The Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres),
as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City.
This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and
programs within the City's General Plan. No substantial changes in the existing land use
designations are included in the proposed update. The changes in land uses are attributable to
a number of things: new guidance for Mixed Use areas and technical refinements to the Plan to
reflect existing or proposed development. With the implementation of the proposed General
Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would occur with buildout:
approximately 13,524 dwelling units; approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial;
approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial; no additional public/quasi-pbblic uses, and
approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 3, 2001
Page 3
The singular goal and purpose of the General Plan is to present the Rancho Cucamonga Vision
(described further in Chapter II) and give guidance to its implementation. The Plan
accomplishes this through a series of policies and implementation actions or programs related
to more specific issues that are important. These policies, in turn, are applied to both public and
private development projects and decisions. Where the City does not have development
authority, as in the unincorporated area or regarding certain functions handled by another unit of
government, the General Plan seeks to influence the appropriate decision making bodies so
that their decisions reinforce our City's vision.
The General Plan is, in effect, the "Constitution" for development in the community.
Consequently, it is imperative that it be used as the basic frame of reference in making
development and conservation decisions within the planning area, whether they involve public
or private lands.
All policies within the General Plan are important or they would not be included. They are to be
applied when the following kinds of decisions are contemplated:
· Budget allocations that impact the physical development in our planning area;
· Review of proposed private development projects;
· Review of proposed public projects, including acquisition or disposal of public lands;
· Proposals by other levels of government that would affect our community's interests;
· Position taking on proposed legislation affecting our community's interests;
· Position taking regarding regional planning activities affecting our community's
interests; and
· Proposed programs or actions to implement our General Plan in addition to those
described above.
Policy is expressed in this Plan in both mapped and written form. The maps depict the
geographic application of policy and express the desired pattern of development and
conservation that define our community. Written policy expresses decision-making guidance
related to what is depicted on the maps or, if the subject is not mapped, as a guide to certain
decision points defined by the policy. Additional diagrams and illustrations are included to
further assist in interpretation of policy and application to specific situations.
Occasionally, users of the General Plan may want additional information regarding the
background and reasoning behind policies in the Plan. Referring to the Appendices or, in some
cases, to the General Plan EIR, can satisfy these needs.
The Draft General Plan Update represents the complete elements that were previously
reviewed at separate times by staff and the General Plan Task Fome. This Draft has
incorporated the changes previously requested. Future modifications will be reserved until the
end of the public hearing process.
71-2
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 3, 2001
Page 4
The Draft General Plan Update represents the complete elements that were previously
reviewed at separate times by staff and the General Plan Task Force. This Draft has
incorporated the changes previously requested. Future modifications will be reserved until the
end of the public headng process.
The Draft General Plan and General Plan Task Force staff report and Draft Environmental
Impact Report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on
June 28, 2001. In addition the Addendum - Responses to Comments for Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR), Housing Element Update, Pages 1-116 and 1-118, Housing Element
Update, Technical Appendix VI - Government Constraints, Pages 4, 14 and 16 and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program were previously distributed with the Planning Commission report.
ANALYSIS: This update of the General Plan is very thorough and because of certain technical
advances, such as the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for the
preparation of maps and storage and retrieval of information, the City realizes a greater benefit
than from the last update. This is significant because one of the advantages we now have is the
ability to manage and maintain General Plan information much more readily than in the past. In
effect, the General Plan in its current form is a powerful resource and land management device
that will contribute to the City government's efficiency and effectiveness in making and carrying
out development decisions.
It is interesting to note that the amount of land use change reflected in this version of the Plan
relative to earlier versions is surprisingly slight. This speaks to two things: 1) previous land use
policy direction has proven to be sound; and 2) many aspects of community development now
requiring attention have more to do with sustaining the quality of development than shaping
changes in what land use patterns are desired.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:LH\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 26, 2001
Resolution Recommending the Certification of the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)
Resolution Recommending Approval of the Draft General Plan Update
THE CITY OF
I~A N C I~ 0 C~CA~IONGA
DATE September 26, 2001
TO:. Chair and Members of the Planning Commission
FRONt Bred Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of Rancho Cucamonga
has completed the Draft City of Rancho Cucamonga Generel Plan Update. The
Project Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000
acres) as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is
located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations
as well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements the City's
Generel Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of
approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non-
residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is
reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18-acres. Within
the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential
uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the
implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e.,
future) development would occur with buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling
units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately
52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and
approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The Project/Planning Area
includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to the north. The
City is located in the southwest comer of San Bemardino County, 13 miles west
of downtown San Bemardino. The San Gabdel Mountains are located to the
north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to
the west, south and east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is
approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is
approximately 7,700 acres. Total project/planning area comprises approximately
31,700 acres. This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action
and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed.
A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and Findings of Overriding
Considerations have been prepared for this Project and will be reviewed and a
recommendation forwarded to the City Council.
7/-'-/
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 26, 2001
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
General Plan Task Force Action:
On July 2, 2001, the General Plan Task Force reviewed these documents and unanimously
recommended they be forwarded for consideration by the Planning Commission and City
Council.
Environmental Determination:
The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is intended to serve as an informational document
for public agency decision-makers and the general public regarding the objectives and
'components of the proposed project. This document addresses the potentially significant
adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with buildout of the proposed General
Plan, as well as, identifies feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to
reduce or eliminate these impacts. This EIR is the pdmary reference document for the
formulation and implementation of a mitigation-monitoring program for the proposed General
Plan.
The intent of this EIR is to provide a Program EIR that evaluates the broad-scale impacts of the
General Plan. A Program EIR is considered a "first-tier" document (California CEQA guidelines,
Section 15152). "Second-tier" documents, such as Project EIRs, Focused EIRs, or Mitigated
Negative Declarations, typically follow and evaluate the impacts of a single activity undertaken
to implement the plan.
On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR for the General Plan Update was released for the 45-day
review period, which ended on August 6, 2001. The EIR and General Plan Task Force staff
report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001.
The Planning Commission is encouraged to provide any comments. The Final EIR (including
the Response to Comments) has been included for review and the Commission is requested to
forward a recommendation to the City Council.
Draft General Plan Update:
The proposed project is the update of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Planning
Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres), as well as its Sphere-of-
Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City. This update includes
changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within the
City's General Plan. No substantial changes in the existing land use designations are included
in the proposed update. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approximately
182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non-residential uses. Within the
existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is
increased by 18 acres. Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres
in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. The change in land
uses is attributable to a number of things: new guidance for Mixed Use areas and technical
refinements to the Plan to reflect exiting or proposed development. With the implementation of
the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would occur with
buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling units; approximately 9,460,680 square feet of
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 26, 2001
Page 3
commercial; approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial; no additional public/quasi-
public uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways.
The singular goal and purpose of the General Plan is to present the Rancho Cucamonga Vision
(described further in Chapter II) and give guidance to its implementation. The Plan
accomplishes this through a sedes of policies and implementation actions or programs related
to more specific issues that are important. These policies, in turn, are applied to both public and
private development projects and decisions. Where the City does not have development
authority, as in the unincorporated area or regarding certain functions handled by another unit of
government, the General Plan seeks to influence the appropriate decision making bodies so
that their decisions reinforce our City's vision.
The General Plan is, in effect, the "Constitution" for development in the community.
Consequently, it is imperative that it be used as the basic frame of reference in making
development and conservation decisions within the planning area, whether they involve public
or private lands.
All policies within the General Plan are important or they would not be included. They are to be
applied when the following kinds of decisions are contemplated:
· Budget allocations that impact the physical development in our planning area;
· Review of proposed pdvate development projects;
· Review of proposed public projects, including acquisition or disposal of public lands;
· Proposals by other levels of government that would affect our community's interests;
· Position taking on proposed legislation affecting our community's interests;
· Position taking regarding regional planning activities affecting our community's
interests; and
· Proposed programs or actions to implement our General Plan in addition to those
described above.
Policy is expressed in this Plan in both mapped and written form. The maps depict the
geographic application of policy and express the desired pattern of development and
conservation that define our community. Written policy expresses decision-making guidance
related to what is depicted on the maps or, if the subject is not mapped, as a guide to certain
decision points defined by the policy. Additional diagrams and illustrations are included to
further assist in interpretation of policy and application to specific situations.
Occasionally, users of the General Plan may want additional information regarding the
background an(il reasoning behind policies in the Plan. Referring to the Appendices or, in some
cases, to the General Plan EIR, can satisfy these needs.
71-g
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 26, 2001
Page 4
The Draft General Plan Update represents the complete elements that were previously
reviewed at separate times by staff and the General Plan Task Force. This Draft has
incorporated the changes previously requested. Future modifications will be reserved until the
end of the public hearing process.
The Draft General Plan and General Plan Task Force staff report was forwarded to the Planning
Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001. The Planning Commission is
encouraged to provide any comments.
HOUSING ELEMENT MODIFICATIONS:
On January 24, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan
Amendment 01-01C for the City's Housing Element update. Following Planning Commission
review, staff submitted the draft Housing Element update to the State Department of Housing
and Community Development (HCD) on January 31, 2001. HCD had 60 days to review the
document, and provided comments and corrections to the City on Apdl 5, 2001. The City
responded to HCD's letter on June 7, 2001, making minor- text changes and clarifying where
specific comments and corrections were located within the Housing Element. Following a series
of communications with HCD, additional comments and corrections were provided to HCD on
July 23, and August 23, 2001. On Apdl 4, 2001, City staff held a conference call with HCD,
where additional comments and corrections were requested by HCD. Staff submitted revisions
of the Housing Element update to HCD on September 6, 2001. HCD staff has reviewed the
latest revisions, and on September 18, 2001, informed City staff that the revisions are
acceptable and a letter of compliance will be sent.
The following minor revisions reflect those comments and corrections, and are the only changes
to the Housing Element update since the Planning Commission received the General Plan
Update in June 2001. Following HCD's final acceptance of the City's Housing Element update,
the City Council will consider the entire General Plan Update, which includes the Housing
Element, in October.
A summary of the corrections is listed as follows, with corrected pages highlighted for inclusion
in your General Plan.
Housing Element:
· Program 2.A.4: Provide for the adoption of density bonus provisions. Revisions provide
for compliance within 180 days of Housing Element adoption.
· Program 2.C.2: Provide for the adoption of emergency shelter provisions. Revisions
provide for compliance within 180 days of Housing Element adoption.
Housing Element Technical Appendix:
· Section VI - Governmental Constraints: Provided discussion to explain why the City's
Parking Standards and Design Review process are not a constraint on development.
71-7
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 26, 2001
Page 5
ANALYSIS: This update of the General Plan is very thorough and because of ce~ain technical
advances, such as the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for the
preparation of maps and storage and retrieval of information, the City realizes a greater benefit
than from the last update. This is significant because one of the advantages we now have is the
ability to manage and maintain General Plan information much more readily than in the past. In
effect, the General Plan in its current form is a powerful resource and land management device
that will contribute to the City government's efficiency and effectiveness in making and carrying
out development decisions.
It is interesting to note that the amount of land use change reflected in this version of the Plan
relative to earlier versions is surprisingly slight. This speaks to two things: 1) previous land use
policy direction has proven to be sound; and 2) many aspects of community development now
requiring attention have more to do with sustaining the quality of development than shaping
changes in what land use patterns are desired.
RECOMMENDATION: Review and comment as needed after public comment is considered.
Adopt the attached Resolutions recommending approval of the Draft General Plan Update and
Certification of the Final EIR.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:LH\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Addendum - Responses to Comments for Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR)(Previously Circulated with staff report dated September
12, 2001)
Exhibit "B" -Mitigation Monitoring Program (Previously circulated with staff
report dated September 12, 2001 )
Exhibit "C" - Housing Element Update, Pages 1-116 and 1-118
Exhibit "D" - Housing Element Update, Technical Appendix VI - Government
Constraints, Pages 4, 14 and 15
Resolution Recommending the Certification of the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)
Resolution Recommending Approval of the Draft General Plan Update
EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" WERE
DISTRIBUTED WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED
SEPTEMBER 12, 2001
~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
PROGRAM 2.A.3: Monitor restricted, affordable housing
production within the redevelopment project area assisted by
the Redevelopment Agency.
Tarqet: New homeowner and renter households within the
redevelopment project area assisted by the Redevelopment
Agency.
Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Redevelopment Agency and Planning Division; Pdvate Sector.
Financing: Public and Private Sector Cooperation.
Schedule: On-going.
PROGRAM 2.A.4:
Tarqet: To be dete~in~ at time of individual request.
Responsible Agent: Ci~ of Rancho Cu~monga, Planning
Division.
Financine: General Fund, Ci~ Budget.
~ays' 0f ~oPti~n Of.~ H~sih~ ~l&~ht~d~.
PROG~M 2.A.5: Continue info,al discussions with private
developem and multi-family apa~ment managem en~umging
use of federal mn~l assistan~ programs to assist lower
income households residing and/or wo~ing in the Ci~ and
~ntinue to suppo~ San Bema~ino Coun~ Housing Au~oH~
CSBCHA") appli~tions for additional federal vouchem to meet
the needs of Iow-in~me households now residing in ~e Ci~.
Target: The SBCHA provides housing assis~n~ to 186
households residing in the Ci~ as of June 30, 2000. This
includes 170 Se~ion 8 vouchem and 16 public housing uni~.
Resoonsible Agent: Ci~ of Rancho Cu~monga, Planning
Division; PHvate sector, San Bemardino Coun~ Housing
tt ~ I Au~ori~.
HUD Renal Assis~n~
Financing:
Programs.
Page 1-116 C~ of Rancho ~c~onga ~ne~ P~n
C:lWlNNnT~ /ntem~ R~l~B~er 3 ~ R~.d~ September l O, 2001
Schedule: On-going.
POLICY 2.C: Assist providers of temporary emergency shelter
and transitional housing opportunities.
PROGRAM 2.C.1: Continue to assist the efforts of local
organizations, and community groups to provide temporary
emergency shelter, transitional housing opportunities, and
services to the City's homeless population.
Target: Identified homeless population.
Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning
Division; local organizations and community groups.
Financing: CDBG.
Schedule: On-going.
PROGRAM 2.C.2: Evaluate existing Code requirements to
determine those conditions and standards where various types
of shelter facilities may be located, including review and
evaluation of industrial districts. Research and evaluate
special requirements for location of shelters for abused women
and children, specifically the need for an anonymous address.
Target: Identified homeless population with special emphasis
on needs of abused women and children.
Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning
Division.
Financin_a: General Fund, City Budget, and CDBG.
Schedule: Add t6 '~e 20ol ~0~ ~!ahn!~g':D~i~i6~ a~d~l
Work pr~ram and ad°Pt emergenCY~sh~lte?~'Pro~i~i0n~ withih
180 days of ad°ptibn 0fthe H(~USin~'-Ei~t d~d~te~3]!
PROGRAM 2.C.3: Participate with adjacent communities
toward the provision of a subregional shelter program and
encourage the County to develop a comprehensive homeless
program.
Target: Identified homeless population.
Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning
Division; Area cities; County.
Financing: Not Applicable.
Page 1-118 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
C;[WlNNnTemporary tntemet Filesl~LKBIChapter 3 H~using Rev, doc September 10, 2001
Governmental Constraints
Building standards, such as parking and height requirements, generally, do not provide a
constraint to development. Typically, building heights are permitted to increase with increased
density. Parking is based upon the unit type and number of bedrooms. Carports are permitted in
multi-family developments when approved by the Design Review Committee. The variability of
these development standards permits a wide variety of housing types, including single and multi-'
family, rental and ownership, and mobile homes. Application of these development standards to
the remaining vacant land resources will continue to provide a broad range of housing
altematives consistent with the City's share of the Regional Housing Need. (For vacant land
analysis see Tables IV-1 and IV-2, as well as Map IV-l).
~g standa~s are not~a cons[ra nt~ n, deve~Pm~:~cu~;~
st~iti~ird§~fol~n~ ~l~i~fam~.proj~have~en ~n~
pancJng~§Races or, a~stu~!~un,tto:2:G~sp~ces,f~' ~?~u~-~L~room~ ~g~
nu~e~o!~a..~ nent:.umt~devel~e~.~nrdet~thes s,tanda~sAan~d~f~t..~t~
Annexation Potential
The City's Sphera-of-lnfluence is located north of the City between the City limits and the
National Forest Boundary in environmentally hazardous and sensitive areas. The resulting
constraints limit the range of potential residential development. Annexations have added "Low"
and "Very Low" single-family residential development areas to the City. No new annexations
have occurred since 1989, however an annexation for 504 acres is currently being processed.
The ENSP was adopted on Apdl 1, 1992 as a pre-zone for future annexation. Land in the
Sphere-of-Influence lacks urban infrastructure, and much of the area is expected to remain as
open space. Developable areas have slopes in excess of 8% and are subject to the City's
Hillside Development Regulation Ordinance. Residential development in the sphere areas will be
more expensive and at lower average density than residential development within the current City
boundaries. Consequently, annexation is expected to prove sites for move-up rather than for
affordable housing.
7/-/Z
Governmental Con~traint~
TABLE VI-6: School Enrollment
Alta Loma School Distdct Public K thru 8 7,755 7,629
Central School District Public K thru 8 4,723 5,116
Cucamonga School District Public K thru 8 2,368 2,770
Etiwanda School District Public K thru 8 4,658 7,400
Harvard Race Pdvate K thru 8 0 161
Sacred Heart Elementary Private K thru 8 242 285
Alta Loma Christian Private preschl-8 300 278
Children's Learning World Private preschF8 260 260
Pacific Coast Schools Private preschl-8 45 45
Montessori School House Private 3 thru 12 66 60
Alta Loma High School Public 9 thru 12 2,556 2,891
Etiwanda High School Public 9 thru 12 1,992 3,237
Rancho Cucamonga High School Public 9 thru 12 2,310 2,894
Total ~ ~'~'~:~ ~!~'~ 27,275 33,026
Source: School Districts and Private Schools
E. LOCAL PROCESSING AND PERMIT PROCEDURES
Processing and Permit Procedures
The development review process, from the time of formal application submittal through review by
the Planning Commission is 11 weeks with the goal of the reducing the processing time 8 weeks;
to reach this goal some technical issues will be resolved during plan check. The review process
includes review before various recommending committees including the Trails, Grading,
Technical Review, and Design Review Committees. The process is designed so that all of the
necessary reviewing departments, including Planning, Building and Safety, Engineering,
Community Services, Sheriff, and Fire are involved in the project review from the earliest stages.
As a result, City agencies function in a coordinated manner and the applicant is appraised of any
concerns early in the review process.
the ~t~ti~l
The same review format is used for residential, commercial, and industrial projects. The actual
review process may extend beyond the 11-week period. For example, a complex project,
significant unresolved environmental issues, or inadequate plans may lengthen the review
VI- 14 (September2001)
7/43
Governmental Constraints
pedod. The resolution of design issues infrequently extends processing time. The development
review process provides a minimum of three weeks notice to the public prior to a project's first
public hearing by the Planning Commission. For infill project and large projects, neighborhood
meetings are scheduled early in the application process in order to identify and address
community concems and address those concerns prior to Planning Commission consideration.
In 1994, the Planning Commission requested process-streamlining policies. In the first revision
of the development review process, the City Planner may consider and decide routine matters.
For example, tentative tract proposals for less than 10 acres sites which are not located on an
arterial street, and non-construction Conditional Use Permits. The City Planner provides a public
notice of meeting and conducts a hearing prior to decision on such projects.
VI- 15 (September2001)
Values
Unity
Expectations
QUALITY
CELEBRATING
COMMUNITY
COMPREHENSIVE SCOPE
General P~an Chapter Corresponding Elements
L Shaping the Future of Not Required
Rancho Cucamongs; An
Introduction
II The Rancho Cu~amonga Not Requi~
Vision
lll~ Devefeping ~e [~ncl Use
Corcrcunlty Transportation
Housing
Public Facilities and Services
Corcmunity Design
Econorcic Development
IV, Managing Envirenmental Open Space
Resources Conservation
V; M~ihtaining PaSllc Health Noise
and Safety Safety
Air Quality
~; [mplerce~ting the General Not Required
Plan
LAND USE PLAN
LAND USE PI~AN
POLICY INTENT
Action Terms
Shall - Always carryout
Should - Almost always carryout
Discussion Paragraph
Mixed Use - Carefully selected t~cal points with
special rules
Connectivity
Activity Centers - Linked to community design
guidance
INTERNAL SIMPLIFICATION
('~rculalion Plan
READABILITY
T[~e Importa~ce oi~'Vi~io~
Vision is a mental picture of the future that conveys what we believe to be m~portant
characteristics of our community at sollle time in the f~J~k~re it has the power to ~f~sagJne a
future tba~ sustah~s the positive values of the p~esent It is derNed as well from core
values of the past that have proved to contribute to the quality of life that makes Rancho
Cucamonga what t is Our Vision is crafted flora a numbe~ of issues we believe reflect the
this Vision Finally it imagines that future decisions events and actions w~i~ follow a similar
pattern
TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENTS
SPECIALIZED STUDIES
Fire District
Strategic Plan
Police Services Plan
Library Master
Recreation Needs
Assessment
REVIEW THOROUGHNESS
General Plan Task Force
Interdepartmental Review
Department Workshops
MANAGEMENT TOOL
Type
2.6.1.1.1 ._~ ~ extent possible, respond to regional market interests as well.
local as wellas regional needs, including provisions for a PL RD, ENG, CS lA, C, G, H 1
Complete development plans fo~ the Regional M all PL ENG, CS, FIN G, H, I 1
Access ~o regional serving uses shall be designed to provide
including Foothill Blvd. and Day Creek Blvd. ENG PL H, I 1
enables our residents and businesses to readily be integrated into
~rivate development projects. PL RD, CS, ENG A, I 4
Community Services, Fire Departmenl, Library Services, Police
Department and appropriate school districts so they can be aware of PL RD A 5
and businesses to apprise them of available community services and PD, B& S, FD,
programs. CS PD, LIB A 5
Identify priority la~el areas for priority new development in A, E, F~ G,
conjunction with the Housing Element implementation programs. PL RD, FIN H, I 4
Development shall be permitted only when adequale public services
and facilities are in place or will be concurrently provided in
2.6.1.1.6 ff accordance with established City standards. PL ENG A, I 4
MANAGEMENT TOOL
New development should especially be permitted where it is
logical to extend existing infrastructure improvements, and
2.6.1.1.5 4 4 where it includes particularly housing of varied densities.
development in conjunction with the Housing Element A, E, F,
~mplementation programs. PL RD, FIN G, H, I 4
Development shall be permitted only when adequate public
services and facilities are in place or will be concurrently
2.6.1.1.6 ¥ provided in accordance with established City standards. PL ENG A, I 4
A WELCOMING CITY ~¥1TH A
GENERAL PLAN TO MATCH
RESOLUTION NO O/- ~- 2 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE 2001 GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND
MAKING ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AS
REQUIRED BY LAW
A. Recitals.
1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conformance with the
requirements of State Law, adopted a complete General Plan and certified the Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan on April 6, 1981, by the approval of Resolution
No. 81-40.
2. After various amendments and partial updates, the City commenced the process of
preparing a comprehensive update of its General Plan in 1999. The process of updating the
General Plan has involved various departments of the City and included numerous meetings of
a General Plan Task force, which was comprised of representatives from the City Council,
Planning Commission, staff, and community members. As a result of that process, a draft '
General Plan Update has now been completed.
3. The General Plan Update was prepared pursuant to Section 65300 et seq. of the
State Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code) to provide the City with
comprehensive, long-range policy guidelines for future growth and development which
incorporates the mandated elements, including Land Use, Circulation (Transportation), Housing,
Conservation (Environmental Resources), Open Space, Noise, and Safety (Public Health and
Safety). In addition, the General Plan Update sets forth "The Rancho Cucamonga Vision" and
includes additional provisions to address Public Facilities and Services, Community Design,
Economic Development, and Air Quality.
4. An Initial Study was prepared for the General Plan Update (the "project") pursuant to
Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines by the Planning Department staff with the
assistance of the City's environmental consultant, Michael Brandman Associates. The Initial
Study, which was completed on May 22, 2000, identified that there was substantial evidence
that the project may have a significant impact on several environmental resources and
governmental services. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, a
decision was made to prepare an EIR for the project.
5. On May 22, 2000, a Notice of Preparation was prepared and sent to the State
Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California and to other
responsible agencies. The review period on the Notice of Preparation closed on July 7, 2000.
6. On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR was completed and made available for public
review. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of
Completion of the Draft EIR, which was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research.
Public Notice of Availability of the EIR and of the comment period was provided pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section 21092 and a copy of the Notice was posted in the office of the
County Clerk in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.3. The EIR was
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 2
circulated to interested agencies between June 22, 2001, and August 6, 2001, for a 45-day
comment period pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087. Comments were received
and responses prepared and incorporated into the EIR. A copy of the Final EIR is on file in the
Planning Division in the City.
7. On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public headng on the
General Plan Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Notice of the
time, place, and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in
accordance with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and 65090
8. On September 19, and continued to October 3, 2001, t.he City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public headng on the General Plan
Update and Draft General Plan EIR. Notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the hearing
was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in accordance with the requirements of
Government Code Section 65355 and 65090.
9. The Final EIR referred to in this resolution consists of that draft document dated June
2001, entitled Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Draft Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027), written comments on that draft report, and written
responses and an addendum to the EIR submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho
Cucemonga, attached as Exhibit "A" of the September 12, 2001 Planning Commission staff
report for this item, and written testimony presented by the City's staff and the City's consultant
during the hearings on the recommended adoption of said General Plan Update, insofar that the
testimony pertained to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-mentioned documents
will be referred to as "the Final EIR."
10. The General Plan Update was prepared in accordance with the General Plan
Guidelines promulgated by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. In addition, the
Noise Element was prepared consistent with the guidelines established by the Office of Noise
Control in the State Department of Health Services, and the Circulation (Transportation)
Element is consistent with the currently applicable Congestion Management Plan.
11. The City submitted the proposed General Plan Update to other public agencies for
review as follows:
a. The draft Housing Element was submitted to the Califomia Department of
Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review. On August 14, 2001, HCD informed
the City that only minor changes to the Element would be required to obtain its certification,
which changes have now been made.
b. The City consulted with the Division of Mines and Geology of the Department of
Conservation and the Office of Emergency Services for the purposes of including information
known by that Division into the General Plan as required by Government Code Section 65302
(g). In addition, the provisions that comprised the Safety Element were submitted to the same
Division for review of seismic safety policies.
c. The proposed General Plan Update was distributed for review and comment
pursuant to Government Code Section 65352 to interested parties including, but not limited to,
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 3
the County of San Bemardino, local school districts, water purveyors, and other interested
parties.
12. AIl legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The Planning Commission specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct:
2. With respect to the potential significant environmental effects identified in the Final
EIR, the City Council specifically makes the following findings:
a. Soils and Geology
(1) Modifications in topography will occur within the sphere-of-influence area.
The modifications will result from cutting native slopes. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The significant
effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less
than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR
and incorporated into the project that restrict upland areas to Iow density
residential use and continued enforcement of the Hillside Development
Ordinance and Guidelines that ensures prudent development of properties
that have a slope greater than 10% and preservation,' as open space,
properties that have a slope greater than 30%.
(2) The proposed General Plan would allow the development of hillside
residential uses within the northern portion of the Planning Area. This area
includes geologic hazards such as potential slope failures, landslides, and
erosion. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the
environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation
measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project
that, among other things, require geologic engineering investigations for
developments proposed in areas of potential geologic hazards, restrictions
on development in areas with unsafe geological conditions, mitigation of
private properties where City property or public right-of-way is threatened
from slope instability, or where considered appropriate and urgent by the
City Engineer, Fire, or Police Departments, disaster recovery measures
following severe winter storms, and a third-party review of geotechnical
reports for private development projects.
(3) Development occurring within the Planning Area and under the proposed
General Plan could experience seismic hazards. These hazards include
7/-/7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 4
ground rupture, ground shaking, and ground failure. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has
been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR
and incorporated into the project that include, but are not limited to,
regulating the type and intensity of new development in potential seismic
hazard areas, compliance with State regulations, including setbacks, for
Special Study Zones, strengthening planned utilities, encouraging the
retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings, and other measures.
(4) Construction activities associated with the implementation of the proposed
General Plan could result in shod-term windblown sand impacts. Changes
or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The significant
effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less
than significant by virtue of mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR
and incorporated into the project that include encouraging the preservation
of existing wind rows (landscape buffers which reduce impacts from
windblown sand), the planting of protective landscape buffers on the
eastern sides of proposed projects, review of architectural plans for
structures to reduce "wind tunnel" effects, cooperating with neighboring
jurisdictions in the reduction of' windblown sand, and requiring the
suspension of grading operations during high winds.
b. Hydrology and Drainage
(1) Grading activities associated with the implementation of the proposed
General Plan will result in cut and/or fill activities for the future land uses.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a
level that is less than significant by a mitigation measure as identified in the
final EIR and incorporated into the project that requires the use of best
management practices to minimize pollutant runoff.
(2) Implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in the
development of approximately 5,000 acres of urban land uses that would
substantially increase the potential storm water runoff from areas
throughout the Planning Area. Changes or alterations have been required
in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant
effects on the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that require storm water facilities to be constructed that are
adequate to accommodate the surface water runoff generated by new
development, the continued upgrade of the City's drainage system in
conjunction with plans and funds provided by the County of San Bernardino
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 5
Flood Control District, periodic review its flood control fees to ensure
adequate funding is available to construct the City's drainage system, and
review and input into the level of development intensity and current
conservation practices within the City's sphere-of-influence and the San
Bernardino National Forest.
(3) With an increase in stormwater runoff from future development under the
proposed General Plan, there would also be the potential for an increase in
pollutants from new land uses that are conveyed to creeks, spreading
grounds and groundwater basins. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the
significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the
project that will promote programs to protect water quality and to conserve
water supplies in coordination with the Cucamonga County Water District,
protection of natural stream courses in the Planning Area from erosion and
pollution from urban runoff, and. Implementation of best management
practices to minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater
basin. This will include, where applicable, the preparation of Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Programs (SWPPPs) to control runoff from
construction sites.
c. Biological Resources
(1) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may potentially affect natural
biological communities. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
on the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that
include the City undertaking an inventory of remaining natural areas within
City limits for the purpose of retaining important areas in their natural state,
limiting encroachment of development into these natural areas that have
biological significance such as the canyons in the existing sphere-of-
influence area, requesting through County planning officials, expanded
biological studies for all proposed developments within the sphere-of-
influence.
(2) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may potentially affect alluvial
fan sage scrub, a sensitive plant community. Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the
project that include the establishment of a biological assessmentJ
clearinghouse to identify areas of potential impacts, especially regarding
rare or endangered species of flora and fauna, the establishment of a
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 6
conservation land use designation to preserve the existing alluvial fan sage
scrub. This should include most of the remaining alluvial associations and
all of the streamside woodland, designation of approximately 1,000 acres of
open space within a conservation area in the Planning Area.
(3) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect threatened or
endangered species. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on
the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation
measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that
requires that any development that results in the potential take or
substantial loss of occupied habitat for any threatened or endangered
species will require formal consultation with the appropriate regulatory
agency.
(4) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect nesting habitat for
migratory bird species. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on
the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as
identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that protect
migratory birds and raptor nests, encourage the planting of vegetation that
will provide new habitat and the retention of spedfied windrows.
(5) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect Big Horn Sheep.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a
level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measure as
identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that protect areas
designated as sensitive, or unique, or those that contain rare, threatened,
or endangered species, against direct or indirect impacts.
(6) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
on the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of
mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the
project that restricts proposed development, including road development,
in certain defined and documented riparian corridors, compliance with the
USACE Nationwide Permit Program, Section 401 water quality
certifications from the Regional Water Quality Control Board and Section
1603 straambed alteration agreements, as required.
7/-2
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 7
d. Land Use and Planning
(1) An increase in development may result in potential land use
incompatibilities. Incompatible land uses increase the potential for land use
conflicts to create noise, visual, development intensity, and privacy impacts.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a
level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project that, among
other things, promotes opportunities for mixed use development in carefully
selected areas, restricts strip commercial development in favor of more
focused commercial or mixed use centers, restricts the intensity of
commercial concentrations at intersections other than town center and
regional center locations, lowering residential intensities when adjacent to
Iow density residential neighborhoods, restricting intensive uses and
activities in areas where they would be threatened by man made hazards,
concentrating heavy industrial uses to areas east of the electrical power
plant and allowing medium and high density residential uses along transit
routes in mixed-use areas and in the vicinity of activity centers.
e. Traffic and Circulation
(1) Implementation of the proposed General Plan as well as year 2020 traffic
volumes from adjoining cities and areas will result in an approximately 128
percent (821,000 daily trips) increase over existing daily trips. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The significant
effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less
than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that include the required preparation
of traffic impact studies in accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion
Management Plan (CMP), preparation of site-specific access studies,
annual traffic monitoring programs to ensure that funds from developers
and development fees remain adequate to finance on-going cimulation
projects, implementation of changes in roadway classifications as identified,
and the construction of the 6th StreetJl-15 interchange.
(2) The proposed General Plan will result in 18 intersections operating at LOS
D or worse. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the
environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation
measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that
require traffic studies for both interim and future conditions at such
intersections in connection with future development projects, the
preservation of sufficient right-of-way, and specified improvements at
certain intersections.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 8
f. Noise
(1) Any siting of sensitive land uses, such as schools, churches, and
commercial office uses within the 60 and 65 dBA CNEL noise contoum
represents a potentially significant impact. Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that include requiring project applicants to comply with increased
setbacks, the use of site-specific noise studies, and then ~ompliance with
various sound mitigation measures and strategies as defined.
(2) The proposed General Plan includes the siting of general industrial uses
immediately adjacent to residential land uses between Haven and Grove
Avenues, south of Arrow Route. Resultant noise from these general
industrial uses could exceed both the applicable 60 dBA daytime and 45
dBA nighttime standards. Specific economic, social, or other
considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Final EIR. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
virtue of a mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR and
incorporated into the project that precludes industrial facilities from being
constructed within 500 feet of any commercial land uses or 2,800 feet of
any residential land uses without the preparation of a noise analysis.
g. Public Service and Utilities
(1) Police Services. Development under the proposed General Plan will result
in a demand for approximately 31 new police officers. This increased
demand for police services is a significant impact. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or
avoid the significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has
been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and
incorporated into the project that provides that the City continue to
adequately fund police services, regularly evaluate and adjust its crime
prevention programs, maintain an average five-minute response time for
emergency calls, encourage the use of physical site planning as a tool in
crime prevention, the continued promotion of neighborhood watch and
crime prevention programs, and the continued use of volunteer forces (e.g.,
reserves and citizen patrol) to assist with police duty.
(2) Fire Services. Development under the proposed General Plan will require
approximately 6 additional on duty fire fighters (or approximately 18 new.
fire fighters due to the three shifts that the Department has per day).
Increased demand for fire protection and emergency medical services is a
significant impact. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
7/
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 9
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
on the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that provide that the City will continue to support the reduction of Urban
Wildland threats through fire prevention, public education, code
compliance, internal fire sprinklers, vegetation medications and reduction,
adequate water supplies, improved ingress and egress to development and
adequately located, staffed, and equipped Fire District stations. In addition,
the City will continue to support adequate funding of the Fire District and
the provision of adequate fire flows by adequate water storage, among
other measures.
(3) Water. The proposed General Plan will result in the incremental demand
for approximately 10.1 million gallons of water within the Planning Area.
This increase in water demand represents an approximately 35 percent
increase over existing demand within the Planning Area. This increase is
considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing
water facilities. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
on the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that provide that the City will coordinate with the Cucamonga County Water
District and Inland Empire Utilities Agency to ensure adequate water
supplies and facilities, clustering of development in areas suitable for
groundwater replenishment, integration of structures to retain precipitation
and runoff into development designs, continued support of the Cucamonga
County Water District's efforts to develop canyon water supply and to
encourage water conservation, cooperation in efforts to expand the re-use
of wastewater where feasible, and continued implementation of applicable
provisions of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
for municipal and private projects to protect ground water recharge areas
from potential pollutant runoff.
(4) Wastewater. The proposed General Plan will result in the incremental
generation of approximately 4.0 million gallons per day of wastewater. This
increase in wastewater represents an approximately 31 percent increase
over the existing generation of wastewater within the Planning Area. This
increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant impact
on existing wastewater facilities. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the
significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
virtue of a mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR and
incorporated into the project that provides that the City will coordinate with
the Inland Empire Utility Agency and the Cucamonga County Water District
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 10
to ensure adequate wastewater facilities are available to meet future
growth.
(5) Solid Waste. Development under the proposed General Plan will result in
the generation of approximately 236 tons of additional solid waste. This
increase represents an approximately 87 percent increase over the amount
of solid waste that is currently being generated within the Planning Area.
This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant
impact on existing solid waste facilities. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the
significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the
project that provide that the City will continue to implement waste reduction
procedures consistent with AB 939, and that the City will coordinate with
other public entities and solid waste haulers to ensure adequate services
and facilities are available inside and outside the County to collect and
dispose of solid waste.
(6) Natural Gas. The proposed General Plan will result in an incremental
demand for natural gas throughout the Planning Area. As shown in Table
5.9-9, there will be a demand for approximately 32.9 million therms of
natural gas per year. This represents an approximately 81 percent increase
in natural gas that is currently in demand throughout the Planning Area.
This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant
impact on existing natural gas facilities. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the
significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that provide that the City will provide population projections to The
Gas Company to ensure adequate planning for natural gas demands.
(7) Electricity. The proposed General Plan will result in an incremental
demand for electricity throughout the Planning Area. There will be a
demand for approximately 659 million kilowatts of electricity per year. This
represents an approximately 117 percent increase in electricity that is
currently in demand throughout the Planning Area. This increase is
considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing
electrical facilities. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on
the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as
identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that provide that
the City will promote and pursue vadous specified strategies to decrease
dependence on imported and non-renewable energy resources, promote
circulation planning that will contribute to the reduction of operational
energy requirements, promote use of energy efficient programs into
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 11
commercial and industrial developments where feasible, promote strategies
for a balance of housing and employment opportunities within the City and
region, and provide population projections to Southern California Edison to
ensure adequate energy planning.
(8) Library Services. Implementation of the proposed General Plan would add
approximately 13,524 residential units and approximately 30,680 people to
the Planning Area compared to the residential units and population that
existed in the Planning Area as of January 2000. This increase in residents
will substantially increase the demand for library services. Based on a
minimum standard of 0.5 square feet of library space per person, the
incremental increase of approximately 30,680 residents to the Planning
Area would result in a demand for approximately 15,500 square feet of
library space. The City does not have any currently planned library facilities
within the Planning Area. Therefore, the residents associated with the
future development of the proposed General Plan would significantly impact
existing library services. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on
the environment. The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as
identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that provides that
the City will provide a minimum of 15,500 square feet of library space with
the Planning Area to serve future residents pursuant to the Library Master
Plan.
h. Aesthetics and Visual Resources
(1) Build out of the proposed General Plan would result in a substantial
increase in urban uses throughout the Planning Area. The proposed
General Plan would allow replacement of existing uses; however, the
majority of the new development is expected to occur on vacant land. (New
development will be expected to conform to the design guidelines
established for residential, commercial, and industrial development,
however. A high level of quality through design will be expected based on
existing guidelines and the design review process conducted by staff and
officials.) Future development in accordance with the proposed General
Plan in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and sphere-of-influence areas is
expected to substantially 'alter open space views. This alteration is also
expected to include obstructing existing panoramic views of the alluvial fan
at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. The conversion of open space to
urban uses would result in the obstruction of existing open views as well as
potentially obstructing distant panoramic views from existing development.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a
level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the
final EIR and incorporated into the project that will preserve and enhance
the special qualities of existing districts and neighborhoods through focused
71-z5
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 12
attention on land use, community design and economic development,
establishment of entry monumentation as a means of stimulating
community, district and neighborhood identity, continued implementation
and updating of the City's comprehensive design guidelines, the
establishment of transitions between developed and the natural (unbuilt)
environment, the creation of strong landscape edges along roadways, the
continued undergrounding of utilities, ensuring that communication towers
blend into the surrounding environment, maintain the rural development
patterns and character of the Etiwanda area through the Etiwanda Specific
Plan, create urban centers at appropriate locations, ensure trees and
structures are oriented to preserve views of key locations and obstruction of
views is kept to a minimum, and protect and preserve windrows, vineyards
and citrus groves where feasible and the re-establishment of these special
landscape elements within the City.
i. Cultural Resources '
(1) Prehistoric Archaeoloqical Resources. The impacts act of future
construction activity could adversely affect or eliminate existing and
potential archaeological resources. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the
significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the
project that provide that a qualified archaeologist perform necessary field
surveys where evidence suggests the potential for prehistoric resources,
communication with the Native American Heritage Commission as specified
when there is the potential for discovery of sacred land resources, and
compliance with various archaeological protocols as defined.
(2) Historic Archaeolo.qical Resources. The impacts of future construction
activity could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential historical
landmarks and points of interest. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the
significant effects on the environment. The significant effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the
project that require the City to conduct surveys, communicate with relevant
historical preservation agencies and entities and compliance with a variety
of historic preservation protocols.
(3) Paleontoloqical Resources. Older alluvial deposits have a high sensitivity
rating as they may yield highly significant vertebrate fossils, although no
paleontological resources have been recorded from the area within the City
of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-influence. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. The significant
effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less
than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and
71-2
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 13
incorporated into the project that require the City to conduct surveys,
communicate with relevant paleontological preservation agencies and
entities and compliance with a variety of paleontological preservation
protocols.
3. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the lead agency to
balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in
determining whether to approve the project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to
approve the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update project although significant and
unavoidable adverse impacts related to aggregate resources, prime farmland, short-term and
long-term air quality, long-term noise, library services, and aesthetic and visual resources have
been identified in the EIR. Even though these adverse impacts are not reduced to a level
considered less than significant, the Planning Commission finds, pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 21081 (c) that those impacts are outweighed by the benefits of implementing the
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update because the General Plan Update, will:
a. Conserve valuable natural resources by establishing policies under a new
conservation land use designation within the City and sphere-of-influence.
b. Provide more efficient, pedestrian-friendly use patterns at key locations by
establishing a new mixed use land use designation that is well-defined and would especially
promote joint development of residential and commercial uses.
c. Provide land use changes to the General Plan that would result in less overall
traffic volumes than under the existing General Plan.
d. Continue and augment the land use patterns and policy direction in the existing
General Plan to the maximum extent possible because of their demonstrated effectiveness.
e. Provide development and conservation direction for future annexation of the
sphere-of-influence area.
f. Continue to preserve a large portion of the sphere-of-influence as open space.
g. Promote policies to ensure City compliance with recent changes in various
federal and state laws (e.g. Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act).
In addition, the General Plan Update is itself a measure to mitigate potential adverse
impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a
planned and comprehensive approach to future development. The General Plan Update
includes current statistical information on the community and reflects changes in development
policies as well as established policies incorporated in the General Plan at its adoption in 1981.
The General Plan provides appropriate guidance for the establishment of zoning and
development regulations to mitigate growth induced impacts. Consequently, the adoption of the
General Plan Update will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less
significant in scope than would occur without General Plan guidance, including each altemative
analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact ReporL
7/-Z7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 3, 2001
Page 14
Therefore, the City Council, having reviewed and considered the information
contained in the EIR and the public record, adopts these Statements of Overriding
Considerations, which has been balanced against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts
in reaching a decision on this project.
4. The City Council has reviewed and considered the alternatives to the project
discussed in the Final EIR. Those alternative are: (1) the "No Project/No Development"
alternative (EIR pages 7-2 - 7-3); (2) the "No Project/Development in Accordance with Existing
General Plan Land Use Designations" alternative (EIR pages 7-3 - 7-8); and (3) the "Higher
Intensity" alternative (EIR pages 7-8 - 7-13). With respect to these altematives to the project,
the City Council finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, that there are
economic, social, and other considerations of the project that makes these alternatives
infeasible as specifically set forth on pages 7-1 - 7-13 of the EIR which findings are incorporated
herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that
other than the "No Project" alternative, the proposed General Plan would result in less impacts
compared to the existing General Plan alternative and the "Higher Intensity" alternative.
Therefore, for the reasons indicated above, and for the reasons specified in Section 3 above,
the proposed General Plan Update is considered the envirenmentally superior alternative.
5. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program
attached as Exhibit "A" to this resolution, and finds that the Program has been prepared
pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and that such Program
is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.
6. The City Council finds that the City has reviewed the Housing Element Guidelines
adopted by HCD pursuant to Section 50459 of the Health and Safety Code and finds that the
housing goals, objectives, and policies stated in the revised Housing Element are appropriate
for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will contribute to the attainment of the state housing
goal. The City Council further finds that the adoption of the revised Housing Element will aid the
City's efforts to assist in the development of housing for all economic and demographic
segments of the community and that the Housing Element reflects the requirements of
Government Code Section 65583 (b). The City Council has considered the findings made by
the State Department of Housing and Community Development, and finds, pursuant to
Government Code Section 65585 (e)(1), that the revised Housing Element has been changed to
substantially comply with the comments of the State Department of Housing and Community
Development and with the provisions of Article 10.6 of Title 7 of the California Government
Code (Government Code Section 65580 et. seq.).
7. Based upon the findings contained herein, the City Council does hereby adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the General Plan Update and adopt the 2001
General Plan Update, as drafted, as the approved General Plan for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Rancho Cucatnonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Depa/-~ment/Divi~i0n
Responsible f~or Monitoring
SG-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall continue to restrict land uses in the upland areas to low density Planning
residential use.
SG-2 The City shall continue enforcement of the Hillside Development Ordinance and Guidelines to ensure Planning
prudent development and redevelopment for all property greater than 10% in slope, and continue to
preserve property greater than 30% in slope as open space.
SG-3 The City shall require geologic engineering investigations for developments proposed in areas of Engineering/Building and Safety
potential geologic hazards.
SG-4 The City shall require special construction features in the design of structures where site investigations Engineering/Building and Safety
confirm the existence of geologic hazards.
SG-5 The City shall restrict development from areas with unsafe geological conditions. Planning
SG-6 The City shall continue to support mitigation of existing and private development projects located on Fire
unstable hillside areas, especially slopes with recurring failures, where City property or public right-of-
way is threatened from slope instability, or where considered appropriate and urgent by the City
Engineer, Fire, or Police Departments.
SG-7 The City shall require developers to prepare detailed foundation investigations for potentially unstable Planning
slopes so that grading and construction activities will not lead to potential slope movement.
SG-8 The City shall establish minimum setbacks along the bluff of the Cucamonga Creek to minimize property Planning
damage, injuries, and possible loss of life from ground failure.
SG-9 The City shall consider enacting a geologic disaster recovery ordinance for use following severe winter Fire/Building and Safety
storms that cause extensive landslide or erosion damage.
Exhibit A
!
~ I :~PLANNING~FINAL\C1TYCNC L\GPA 994)7mit tb110-3-01.doe 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Departmgnt/~)ivision
· , ~- ~. Responsible for Monitoring
SC-10 Thc City shall consider implementing a third party review system for geotechnical reports submitted for Building and Safety
development or redevelopment that verify and document engineering properties associated with site
materials.
SCull The City shall continue to regulate the type and intensity of new development in potential seismic hazard Planning
areas.
SG-12 ! The City shall continue to adhere to the regulations imposed by the State for Special Studies Zones. Planning
SG-13 The City shall establish minimum setbacks for any structure proposed for human occupancy with the Planning
Special Studies Zones, based on minimum standards established under State law as well as
recommendations of the project geologist and City Engineer·
SG-14 The City shall require geological and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic Engineering
hazards as part of the environmental and developmental review process for all structures proposed for
human occupancy.
SG-15 The City shall promote strengthening of planned utilities through the Water District's Master Plan, the Engineering
retrofit and rehabilitation of existing weak structures and lifeline utilities, and the relocation or
strengthening of certain Critical Facilities to increase public safety and minimize potential damage from
seismic and geologic hazards.
SG-16 The City shall continue to encourage the retrofit of unreinforced masonry buildings and conduct a Building and Safety
program to identify other potentially hazardous buildings.
SG-17 The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent seismic safety practices into City codes and project Building and Safety
review process.
~ I:~PLANNING~FINALXCITYCNCL~GPA 99-07mit ~b110-3-01.do¢ 2 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
' city Departmen~i~,ision
Mitigation Measures ' ', '
' ~ Responsible for Monitoring
SG-18 ! Thc City shall ~omote alternative project designs or low intensity land uses during thc environmental Planning
and developmental review process in areas determined to have significant seismic or geologic constraints.
SG-19 Thc City shall promote public awareness of seismic and geologic hazards within thc City, and support Building and Safety
emergency preparedness.
SG-20 The City shall consider employing the following policies to minimize the impacts from windblown sand: Building and Safety/Planning
Encourage preservation of existing wind rows (landscape buffers which reduce impacts from
windblown sand).
Require developers to plant protective landscaping on the eastern sides of proposed projects within
areas where windblown sand is a problem.
Review architectural plans for structures in terms of wind direction and velocity to reduce potential
"wind tunnel" effects.
Cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions in the reduction of windblown sand.
Suspend grading operations during high winds.
SG-21 The City shall require agricultural operations and new construction to comply with City provisions for Building and Safety
preventing soil erosion and excessive generation of dust where the property is vulnerable to these
conditions
SG-22 The city should evaluate the conservation viable agricultural operations that remain within the planning Planning
area on lands that are designated by the state as important farmland.
SG-23 The City shall maintain maps and descriptions of regionally significant aggregate resources in accordance Planning
with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA).
! I:~PLANNIlqG ~INAL\CITYCNC L\GPA 094)7mit tbl 10-3-01.doc 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures ' '/~ · iCiiy Department/Division
, Risponsible for Monitoring
SG-24 The City shall consider the value and benefit to the community of regionally significant aggregate Planning
resources within the Planning Area prior to approving any such designated lands for other types of
development.
SG-25 In areas that the State of California has designated as regionally significant aggregate resources, the City Planning
will require property titles to include notice of the presence of such resources, in accordance with
SMARA.
SG-26 The City shall establish standards for the development, operation and reclamation of mineral extraction Planning
sites that respect adjacent land uses and provide adequate measures to protect sensitive uses and to assure
effective restoration of expended mining sites in an aesthetic manner.
SG-27 The City shall monitor management of mineral extraction activities to reduce direct and indirect negative Planning
ltD-1 Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed and/or appropriate development impact fees paid to Engineering
ensure adequate facilities will exist to meet the surface water runoff generated by new development.
ltD-2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to upgrade its drainage system in conjunction with plans Engineering
and funds provided by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District to provide necessary flood
control improvements.
HD-3 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will periodically review its flood control fees to ensure adequate funding Engineering
is available to construct the City's drainage system.
ItD-4 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall attempt to maintain and have input on the level of development Planning
intensity and current conservation practices within the City's Sphere of Influence and the San Bernardino
National Forest.
! I:XP LANNINGXFINAL\C ITYCNCL\GPA 994)7mit tb110-3-0 l.doc 4 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures . City D~partment/Division ~
~. ' · Responsible for Monitoring
ltD-5 During the construction and operation of new development the City of Rancho Cucamonga will require Planning
the implementation of best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will include, where
applicable, the preparation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Programs (SWPPPs) to control runoff
from construction sites.
HI)-6 The City will promote programs to protect water quality and to conserve water supplies in coordination Engineering
with the Cucamonga County Water District.
HD-7 The City will promote protection of natural stream courses in the Planning Area from erosion and Planning/Engineering
pollution from urban runoff.
I ltD-8 During the construction and operation of new development the City of Rancho Cueamonga will Engineering
implement best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater
basin. This will include, where applicable, the preparation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Programs (SWPPPs) to control runoff from construction sites.
BR-1 A primary goal of the proposed General Plan is the identification and protection of natural resources. Planning
Toward this end, an inventory for the sphere-of-influence has been completed. The City, in conjunction
with Chaffey College and San Bemardino County, should undertake an inventory of remaining natural
areas within City limits for the purpose of retaining important areas in their natural state. The City shall
limit encroachment of development into these natural areas that have biological significance such as the
canyons in the existing sphere-of-influence area.
BR-2 Proposed development in the riparian corridors should be restricted and permitted only after a site Planning
investigation has assessed potential disturbance to plant and animal resources. All permitted
development should contain measures wherever possible to offset any impacts. The General Plan
encourages developers to use native plant material for landscaping whenever feasible. Cutting mature
native woodland trees is prohibited. Building and road construction will be planned to minimize
disturbance to plants and animals by site planning and noise, dust and soil erosion control practices. The
I:~PLANNING~INAL~CITYCNCL~GPA 994)Tmlt tb110-3-01.doc 5
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures ~! City :Department/Division
· Responsible for Monitoring
USACE and CDFG should be consulted with respect to any proj eot containing j ur/sdictional areas.
BR-3 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will redesignate approximately 1,000 acres of open space to a Planning
conservation use area in the Planning Area, potentially to be used for future mitigation.
BR-4 In conjunction with the County and the local colleges, while the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Planning
Plan (MSHCP) is in progress of passage, the City may wish to establish a biological
assessment/clearinghouse to identify areas of potential impacts, especially regarding rare or endangered
species of flora and fauna.
BR-5 Areas designated as sensitive, unique or those that contain rare, threatened, or endangered species should Planning
be protected against direct or indirect impacts to biological resources. This shall apply to all
development within the streamside woodlands of Day, Deer, East Etiwanda, and San Sevaine Canyons,
and any additional freshwater marshes that are not currently protect in the Etiwanda Preserve. The City
would retain ultimate control over land use decisions within its boundaries or sphere of influence.
However, the United States Forest Service should be informed of any proposed developments adjacent to
National Forest land as it would be responsible to monitor or administer appropriate measures.
BR-6 Careful planning should be employed regarding road construction into new areas. Roads create access Planning
and increase the activity level whether the area is developed or not. Roads should not be constructed
through the streamside woodlands. The activity would remove much of the large animal activity and
resultant local air pollution would destroy cottonwoods, sycamore and ash.
BR-7 The proposed General Plan also encourages landscaping of projects with drought-tolerant and/or fire Planning
resistant vegetation. Where possible, native materials should be used which will help reduce the eventual
loss of natural vegetation due to development. "Grove" style plantings of trees will aid in maintaining
potential habitat for birds.
I i:~PLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mlt fbi 10-3-01.doe 6 ' Mitigation ~..~ton;torln,.,,~,~o,-~am
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures . : City DepartmenffDivision
Responsible~for Monitoring.
BR-8 The windrows in Etiwanda, encompassing over 1,400 acres and the windrows along Hermosa Avenue Planning
north of Wilson Avenue (120 acres) should be maintained for raptor nesting and perching. As needed,
mature trees should be replaced selectively with appropriate species.
BR-9 The City requests, on an ongoing basis through County planning officials, expanded biological studies Planning
for all proposed developments within the sphere-of-influence. Requirements for the preservation or
replacement of sensitive natural areas have been used in those developments where the owners are
contemplating annexation to the City. This procedure is a direct result of the existing and proposed
General Plan policies and coordination with the MSHCP.
BR-10 Migratory birds and raptor nests are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Planning
Fish and Game Code. Mitigation for the taking of active nests may be accomplished in two w.ays. First,
prior to the commencement of tree removal during the nesting season (February-July), all suitable habitat
should be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist. If any active
nests are detected, the area should be flagged and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. Tree
removal and grading could be delayed until after the breeding season (August-January). This could
ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. Implementation of appropriate measures would result in
less than significant impacts. In addition to avoidance measures, raptors will benefit from any restoration
activities associated within the riparian corridors and open space areas. The installation of western
sycamore (Platanus racemosa), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), and cottonwood (Populusfremontii)
trees will provide a heights of up to 85 feet with a dense canopies over 50 feet wide. The native canopy
will not only facilitate the needs of the red-tailed hawk; it will promote utilization by other raptor species
BR-11 It is anticipated that small projects may be processed through the United States Army Corps of Engineers Planning
(USACE) utilizing the Nationwide Permit program. Some projects may involve more extensive
encroachment and/or filling of jurisdictional areas. It is anticipated that development of these areas may
require USACE authorization through the Individual Permit process. Further refinement of the project
and avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures may result in a lessening of potential impacts to
USACE jurisdictional areas.
I:kPLANNINO~FINAL\CITYCNC L\G PA 99-07mit tb110-3-01.doc 7 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
~ Responsibl~e for Monitoring
BR-12 In connection with notification to thc USACE under Section 404 of thc Clean Water Act, pursuant to 33 Planning
CFR Part 330, Appendix A, a written request for Section 401 water quality certification must bc
submitted to thc Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to ensure that no degradation of water
quality will result from project implementation. RWQCB certification must bc issued prior to
commencement of any activity that might affect quality (i.e., project grading). RWQCB processing of a
certification request generally takes 45-60 days. The project proponent is also required to submit a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the RWQCB prior to site grading.
BR-13 A CDFG Section 1603 agreement would be required prior to any alteration of a streambcd or riparian Planning
habitat within CDFG jurisdiction. The 1603 permit will be obtained utilizing the project's approved
Environmcntal Impact Report. To ensure ?apid and favorable action on a 1603 notification, mitigation
measures (c.g., minimization of disturbance to existing onsite riparian habitat and enhancement and
creation of riparian habitat with thc project site) should bc submitted with thc notification package.
CDFG processing of the 1603 agreement usually takes 30 days after receipt of a complete notification
package.
BR-14 Any development that results in the potential take or substantial loss of occupied habitat for any Planning
threatened or endangered species will need to conduct formal consultation with the appropriate regulatory
agency. Consultations will be on a project by project basis and measures will be negotiated
independently for each development project.
LU-I Accommodate new development in a manner that enables thc City's residents and businesses to readily Planning
be integrated into the social and physical structure of the City.
LU-2 Promote development that is sustainable in its use of land in relation to the impact upon natural resources, Planning
energy, air and water quality.
LU-3 Promote opportunities to develop mixed-use areas and projects in carefully selected areas. Planning
I:~PLANN]~G~INAL\CITYCNC L\G PA 99-07mit tbl 10-3-0 l.d~c 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORrNG PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures - . · City DepartmenffDivision
: Responsible for Monitoring
LU-4 Restrict strip commercial development in favor of more focused commercial or mixed-use centers. Planning
LU-5 Restrict the intensity of commercial concentrations at intersections, other than town center and regional Planning
center locations, to two comers.
LU-6 In general, areas where small lot single family attached or detached development (5,200 square feet or Planning
less) would not be compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods, a lower density should occur.
LU-7 Development densities and intensities shall be implemented within the ranges specified in the General ~ Planning
Plan: neither higher nor lower than the limits in the range.
LU-8 Restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where they would be threatened by natural or man made Planning
hazards.
LU-9 The industrial sector along the south edge of the City generally south of Foothill Boulevard should be Planning
protected from intrusions of other uses that could cause land use conflicts that would weaken the long
term competitive value of this area for a wide range of industrial uses.
LU-10 Heavy industrial uses shall be concentrated in the area east of the electrical power plant. Planning
LU-11 Allow medium and high density residential uses along transit routes in mixed-use areas and in the Planning
vicinity of activity centers.
TC-1 Traffic impact studies shall be required with the submittal of proposed development projects in accordance Engineering
with the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic study (where
project traffic is forecasted to generate a minimum 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land uses, or
1,000 two-way trips for retail land uses).
! I:'~PLANNURO'~FIN ALPC ITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mlt tbl 10-34)1.dc~ 9 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures .City Department/DiviSion
Responsib!9 for Monitoring
TC-2 Intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D or worse, as identified in the traffic study, shall requireEngineering
analysis for both interim and future conditions. These priority intersections shall be identified in the traffic
studies prepared for proposed development which contribute 80 or more two-way peak hour trips to ensure
that they are operating adequately.
TC-3 Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at the City's discretion, site-specific access studies to ' Engineering
determine the feasibility of proposed access locations
TC-4 The City shall ensure sufficient right of way is reserved at critical intersections to implement the approach Engineering
lane geometries necessary to provide the levels of services, as noted within the traffic study.
TC-5 The City shall continue to implement an annual traffic monitoring program to ensure that funds fi.om Engineering/
developers and/or area-wide fee programs are appropriately targeted to ongoing circulation needs.
TC-6 The City shall adopt all recommended changes to the General Plan Circulation roadway classifications, as Planning
noted within the traffic study, in order to accommodate projected traffic increases and to insure that
I improvements specified are implemented.
TC-7 The City will conslruct the 6t~ Street/I-15 interchange to allow vehicles to use an alternate means of accessing Engineering
the I~l 5, and thereby reduce the impacts to the areas surrounding other freeway accessible locations.
TC-8 Additional Improvements will be required beyond that necessary for typical roadway standards, as defined in Engineering
the proposed general Plan, for the 11 intersections listed below to ensure that intersections operate at a Level
of Service (LOS) of D or better.
Intersection (LOS is noted for AM/PM)
Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route (C, D)
1-15 SB Ramps and Baseline Road (D, C)
} I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNC L\GPA 99-07mlt tb110-3-01.doe i 0 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures ~ , City Dgpartment/Division
'Responsible for Monitoring
1-15 NB Ramps and Baseline Road 03, D)
Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (D, D)
Milliken Avenue and Ontario Mills Parkway (D, D)
Rochester Avenue and 6t~ Street (D, D)
1-15 SB Ramps and 4* Street (D, D)
1-15 SB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B, B)
1-15 NB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C, C)
Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route (D, D)
Milliken Avenue and SR-30 WB Ramps (C, B)
TC-9 The City will allow the following 7 intersections to operate at a LOS E or better. ' Engineering
19th Street (SR-30) and Carnelian Street (E, E)
Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue (C, E)
Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue (E, D)
Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (D, E)
Milliken Avenue and 4t~ Street (D, E)
Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street/San Bemardino Avenue (D, E)
East and Foothill Boulevard (E, D)
~ I:~PL~NNINO~FI]qAL\CITYCNCLXG pA 99~?~t ~1 ~O+Ol.d~ 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures : City Department/Division ~
Respons!ble for Monitoring
AQ-1 All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational Engineering
emissions. Contractor shall ensue that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and
maintained as per the manufacture's specification. Maintenance records shall be available at the
construction site for City verification.
AQ-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit construction plans to City of Planning
Rancho Cucamonga denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction
contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or
that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform
to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff.
AQ-3 All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Planning
Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray.
AQ-4 All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Planning
AQ-5 All construction shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally contractors shall include Planning
the following provisions:
Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering.
Pave or apply gravel to any un-site haul roads.
Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time.
Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and at~er the end of
work periods.
Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering
practices.
Sweep streets as necessar7 if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result
I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CYI~CNCL\GPA 99-07mit tb110-3-01 .doc 1 2
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
· Responsible for Monitoring
of hauling.
Suspend grading operations during high winds in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or
other suitable means.
AQ-6 All "large-scale" project applicants shall provide incentives to use mass transit including the placement of Engineering
bus stop shelters along major thoroughfares if not so equipped. (City Staff shall determine what denotes
a "large-scale" project.)
AQ-7 All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a bike/walking path between these shelters, the Engineering
proposed residential areas, and the proposed commercial areas. These paths shall bc lit and configured so
as to avoid potential conflict with roadways and railroad activities.
AQ-8 All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not he lef~ idling for Engineering
prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes).
AQ-9 Thc City shall require that both industrial and commercial uses designate preferential parking for Engineering
vanpools.
AQ-10 The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate food service. Engineering
AQ-11 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus Engineering
and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous areas.
AQ-12 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 of more employees shall be requested to configure Engineering
their operating schedules around the MetroLink schedule ~o the extent reasonably feasible.
AQ-13 All residential and commercial structures shall bc required to incorporate high cfficicncyflow polluting Building and Safety
heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters.
I:~ LANNING~F1NAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mlt tb110-3-01 .doc 1 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City.Department/Division
Respons~ible for Monitoring
AQ-14 All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and Building and Safety
weather-stripping.
AQ-15 All residential, commercial, and industrial structures shall be required to incorporate light colored roofing Planning/Building and Safety
materials.
N-1 Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the City shall condition approve of subdivisions that are Planning
adjacent to any developed/occupied noise sensitive land uses by requiring applicants to submit a
construction-related noise mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The plan shall depict the
location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment will be mitigated during
construction of the project through the use of such methods as.'
Temporary noise attenuation fences,
Preferential location of equipment, and
Use of current technology and noise suppression equipment.
While the methods described above will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction
equipment, they do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and
debris. The following measures shall then be required of any proposed development.
N-2 The construction-related noise mitigation plan required as part of the previous noise mitigation measure Planning
shall specify that haul track deliveries be subject to the same hours specified for construction equipment
(i.e., Monday through Saturday, 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and not allowed on Sundays and national
holidays). Additionally, the plan shall denote any construction traffic haul routes where heavy tracks
would exceed 100 daily trips (counting those both to and from the construction site). To the extent
feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
Lastly, the construction-related noise mitigation plan shall incorporate any other restrictions imposed by
City staff.
! I:XPLANNINGXFINAL\C ITYCNC L\O PA 99-07ndt tb110-3-01 .dec 14 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
· ' City Department/DiviSion
Mitigation Measures
Respnn~ible for Monitoring
N-3 Applicants for new proposed land uses shall specify inercased setbacks such that land uses do not lie Planning
within thc 65 dBA CNEL overlay zone for commercial office and sensitive uses (60 dBA CNEL for
residential uses) depicted in Exhibit 5.7-3. This would ensure that any proposed land uses do not exceed
the goals of the City General Plan Noise Element. if inercased setbacks are not provided, an applicant
may implement the following.
Prior to development, a developer shall contract for a site-specific noise study for thc specific site project.
Thc noise study shall be performed by an acoustic consultant experienced in such studies .and the
consultant's qualifications and methodology to be used in thc study must be presented to City staff for
consideration.
The acoustic consultant shall then propare a site-specific noise study for the site under consideration. At
a minimum, the study shall include an evaluation of the existing sc~ng based on both field
measuremcnts and noise modeling. Field measurements are to bc project-specific in that they will
include measurements at those locations where the most sensitive uses are to bc placed in elevated noise
area (c.g., nearest dwellings, or rooms to the roadway or freeway). Measurements shall be obtained using
a certified Type 1 or 2 integrating sound level meter and shall be of sufficient duration to accurately
quantify ambient noise levels. To the extent feasible, roadway noise, with simultaneous traffic counts
shall be obtained to document traffic-generated noise. These measurements are to be obtained in
accordance with methodology prescribed by Caltrans and/or FHWA.
Using the obtained traffic noise data, the study shall then project year 2020 traffic volume noise impacts
at the project site and any noted sensitive areas. The study shall also note specific measures that will be
required to reduce exterior noise levels to meet City Standards. Such measures could include, but are not
limited to increased setback, sound walls and/or berms, building orientation to shield more sensitive
outdoor recreation areas, etc.
If the study determines that the applicant cannot reasonably mitigate exterior noise to less than 65 dBA
CNEL, the study shall also include measures to assure that any interior habitable areas do not exceed the
I:'ff'LANNINGWINAL\CITYCNCL\G pA 99-07mit tb110-3-01.doc 15 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Respo~/~ib!e for Monitoring
interior noise levels included in Table 5.7-4. Any proposed residential development that docs not meet
the 65 dBA CNEL exterior level with proposed mitigation shall bc so noted in thc deed of trust and
disclosed at the time of initial and all subsequent sales. No residential dwellings shall bc placed in areas
with exterior noise levels in excess of 70 dBA CNEL, even with the inclusion of mitigation measures.
Furthermore, if the study finds that exterior habitable areas at commercial and public usc facilities cannot
meet a 70 dBA CNEL noise level, the developer shall post warning signs at any entrances to such
facilities stating such. Actual wording and placement of these signs shall be determined in consultation
with City staff.
No development permits or approval of land use applications shall be issued until an acoustic analysis is
received and approved by thc City Planning Department.
N-4 Potential Impacts of Stationary-Source Noise from Planned Industrial Uses Planning
No industrial facilities shall be constructed within 500 feet of any commercial land uses or 2,800 fcct of
any residential land uses without thc prcparatinn of a noise analysis. This analysis shall document the
nature of thc industrial facility as well as "noise producing" operations associated with that facility.
Furthermore, the analysis shall document the placement of any existing or proposed commercial or
residential land uses situated within the noted distances. The analysis shall determine the potential noise
levels that could be received at these commercial and/or residential land uses and specify very specific
measures to be employed by the industrial facility to ensure that these levels do not exceed City noise
requirements presented in Table 5.74 in Section 5.7.1. Such measures could include, but are not limited
to, the use of enclosures for noisy pieces of equipment, the use of noise walls and or berms for exterior
equipment and/or on-site truck operations, and/or restrictions on hours of operations. No development
permits or approval of land use applications shall be issued until an acoustic analysis is received and
approved by the City staff.
,,~ I:~PLANNING~INAL[CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07rrdt ~bl 10-3-01.doc 16 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division.
~ Respgnsible forlMonitoring
P-1 The City shall continue to adequately fund police services through the collection of taxes, grants, and Finance
development related funding sources.
P-2 The City shall regularly evaluate its crime prevention programs and make adjustments as needed to Police
respond to the changing needs of the community.
P-3 The City shall ensure that an average five-minute response time is maintained for emergency calls, and Police t
maintain and improve, where feasible, response times for calls to service.
P-4 The City shall encourage the use of physical site planning (CPTED-Crime Prevention Thorough Planning/Police
Environmental Design) as an effective means of preventing crime. Developers should design structures,
access systems, open spaces, parking lots, paths, play areas, and other public spaces to contribute to an
overall sense of security and lack of vulnerability to crime opportunity.
P-5 The City shall promote the design of developments that provide maximum visibility approaches to, from, Planning
and within the property by vehicles and particularly by pedestrians.
P-6 Promote the management and maintenance of project areas so that the crime prevention features Planning/Police
originally designated into the project remain operational.
P-7 Proposed developments, to the extent possible, shall attempt to provide physical structures where the Planning/Ploiee
inhabitants will be given an opportunity and the means to extend their use and sphere of responsibility
beyond their front doors. The premise of this measure is that the inhabitants will be more concerned with
an expanded area if that area is designed to appear as part of his territory. Possible techniques for
expanding an inhabitant's territory include:
Cluster buildings and choose building types to reduce the number of households sharing a common
entryway.
Position buildings and their entries to promote the feeling that streets are an extension of the
I:~PLANNING~INAL\CITYCNCL\OPA 994)7mit tb110-3-01.doc 17 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
~ Mitigation Measurgs . ~. City Department/Division .
- Responsib~le,for Monitoring
resident's territory.
Place amenities such as recreational areas, open areas and vegetation within areas defined for the use
of particular inhabitants.
Mix the private grounds of individual units with adjacent areas.
P-8 The City shall continue to promote the establishment of neighborhood watch programs for residential Police
areas aimed at encouraging neighborhoods to form associations to patrol or watch for any suspicious
activity.
P-9 The City shall promote the establishment of crime prevention programs for commercial and industrial Police
areas.
P-10 The City shall encourage the continuation of volunteer forces; (c.g., reserves and citizen patrol) to assist Police
with police duty.
FS-1 The City shall continue to support the reduction of the Urban Wildland threat through the following Fire/Planning
means:
Fire prevention.
Public education.
Emergency Preparedness
Code Compliance.
Internal fire sprinklers.
Adequate vegetation modification and reduction.
· Adequate water supplies.
Improved ingress and egress to development.
I:~PLANNrNO~FINAL\C ITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit 0ol 10-34)1.doc 18 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures Ci~ Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring '
Provision of an adequately located, staffed, equipped, and complement of Fire District stations.
FS-2 The City shall continue to support adequate funding of the Fire District. Fire/Finance
FS-3 The City shall continue to support the maintenance of a well-equipped and staffed Fire District, providing Fire
a high level of service to all natural or technical hazards of fire, emergency medical, and hazardous
materials emergencies.
FS4 The City shall continue to support the provision of adequate fire flows throughout the City and the Fire
provision of adequate water storage to meet peak fire demand during times of peak domestic demand and
during catastrophic events.
FS-5 The Fire District shall continue to review landscape plans to ensure that projects contain the proper use of Fire
fire resistant, drought-tolerant vegetation and adequate open space buffers within the high fire hazard
areas.
FS-6 The city shall regularly review and clarify emergency evacuation plans for dam failure, inundation, fire Fire/Police/Engineering
and hazardous materials releases.
FS-7 The following mitigation shall be used to minimize the incidence of fire outbreaks and prevent its spread, Firet
thereby limiting damage to life and property:
Fire fuel within high-risk fire areas shall be managed and controlled.
A greenbelt or cultivated fuel break shall be provided between high fire risk areas and other areas less
prone to fire hazards.
Building materials shall conform to the standards contained in the Uniform Building and Fire Codes.
Development shall allow and accommodate access by emergency vehicles.
Support a fire protection delive~ system that can confine a structural fire, such as a fire in a
f 1 :~PLANNINGWINAL\C ITYCNCL\G PA 99-07mit 0al 10-3-01.do¢ 19 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September $, 2001)
Mitigation Measures . City Department/Division
Responnlhle for Monitoring
residence, to the room of origin and to where the occupants can be rescued.
FS-8 On a project specific level, the following mitigation shall be used: Fire
Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward the construction of new fire stations and provision
of fire department personnel to serve their project prior to issuance of building permits.
Development impact fees shall be eValuated as necessary to ensure adequate funds are collected to
meet established service levels.
Project applicants shall submit emergency fire access plans to the Fire Department for review and
approval to assure that service to their site is in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District
requirements prior to the approval of grading plans.
Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in accordance with City approved building plans prior to
commencement of structural framing.
Project applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire District that the onsite water supply system is
designed to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage in accordance with City Fire District
requirements prior to the approval of street improvement plans.
Project applicants for large structures shall be required to install automatic sprinkler systems.
FS-9 Implement updated Five-year Strategic Plan. Fire
W-1 The City shall coordinate with the Cucamonga County Water District and Inland Empire Utilities Agency Engineering
to ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities are available to meet future growth.
W-2 Development in areas suitable for groundwater replenishment should be clustered to promote infiltration Engineering
and to maintain areas of open space.
'~ I:~LANNIIqO~FINAL\C1TYCNCL\G pA 99-07rait tb110-34)1.doc 20 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City DePartment/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
W-3 Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site should be integrated into the design of the Engineering
development where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance
infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff
spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
W-4 The City shall continue to support the Cucamonga County Water District's efforts to develop the canyon Engineering
water supply and to encourage water conservation. Water conservation techniques appropriate for new
and existing development include:
Installing flow restrictors in showers.
Repairing leaky water fixtures.
Promoting drought resistant low maintenance vegetation.
W-5 The City shall cooperate with efforts of the Cucamonga County Water District to expand the re-use of Engineering
wastewater for such uses as the irrigation of parkways, golf courses, landscaped areas, and parks, and, if
feasible, for industrial processes.
W-6 The City shall implement applicable provisions of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Engineering
(NPDES) for municipal and private projects to protect ground water recharge areas from construction and
other potential pollutant runoff.
WlV-1 The City shall coordinate with the Inland Empire Utility Agency and Cucamonga County Water District Engineering/Planning
to ensure that adequate wastewater facilities are available to meet future growth.
SW-1 The City shall continue to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Engineering
SW-2 The City shall coordinate with the County of San Bernardino, the San Bemardino Association of Engineering/Planning
Govemments, and solid waste haulers to ensure adequate services and facilities are available within and
outside the County to collect and dispose of solid waste.
I:~PLANN1NGXaCINAL~C1TYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit tb110-3-01 .doe 21 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures " City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
NG-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall provide population projections to The Gas Company to ensure they Planning
have adequate information upon which to project natural gas demands.
NG-2 The City shall coordinate with The Gas Company to ensure adequate services and facilities are available Engineering/Planning
to provide for future development.
ES-1 The City will promote and pursue strategies to decrease dependence on imported non-renewable energy Engineering
resources.
ES-2 The City will promote energy efficiency and renewable energy resources. Engineering
ES-3 The City shall initiate and promote meastffes into land use and circulation planning that will contribute to Engineering/Planning
the reduction of operational energy requirements.
ES-4 The City shall review existing land use and zoning regulations to assess and identify further opportunities Engineering/Planning
for energy conserving measures, including development of an infxastructure to support the use of
alternative fuel.
ES-5 The City will establish and coordinate energy efficiency programs to assist residential users. Engineering
ES-6 The City will promote energy efficient design in all projects. Engineering/Planning/Building
and Safety
ES-7 The City will promote integration of energy efficient programs in all types of commercial development Engineering/Planning/Building
projects, and Safety
ES-8 The City will promote energy efficient technology in the industrial sector wherever possible. Engineering/Planning/Building
and Safety
I:~,PLANNINGkFINAL\C ITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mlt tb110-3-01.doc 22 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures :~ "City DePartment/Division
·. Responsible for Monitoring
ES-9 The City shall continue pursing strategies to promote a balance of housing and employment opportunities Planning
within the City and surrounding region.
ES-10 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall provide population projections to Southern California Edison to Planning
ensure they have adequate information upon which to project electricity demands.
ES-11 The City shall coordinate with SCE to ensure adequate services and facilities are available to provide for Engineering/Planning/Building
future development, and Safety
S-1 The City shall continue to require school districts to verify collection of appropriate school fees prior to Planning
issuance of building permits.
S-2 The City shall support requests by local school districts for state and federal funding to meet an Planning
increasing student population.
S-3 The City shall continue to support state legislation allowing the construction of school facilities through Community Development
special assessment districts.
S-4 The City shall explore means by which development that indirectly creates the need for more schools Planning
(e.g., development which creates substantial job opportunities that in turn creates the demand for local
housing, which in turn creates the need for schools) shall contribute to meeting these needs.
LS-1 The City will provide a minimum of 15,500 square feet of library space within the Planning Area to serve Planning
future residents.
PR-1 The City shall rely upon the Recreation Needs and System Recommendations Study as the basis for Community Services
acquiring parkland, applying park standards, preparing individual park improvement plans, prioritizing
park development projects, upgrading existing facilities, and conducting recreation programs and
services.
I:WLANN1NGWINAL\CITYCNC L\OPA 99-07mlt tb110-34)1 .doe 23 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures ' City Department/Division
Respmi~ih!e f~r Monitoring
PR-2 The City shall require developers of residential projects to dedicate land and/or pay in-lieu fees in Engineering
accordance with its City's Local Park Ordinance (Ordinance No. 105).
PR-3 The City shall require parkland improvements and facilities to be made by the developer in developer- Engineering
dedicated neighborhood parks, other than improvements of a specialized nature (e.g., recreation
buildings) as determined by the Community Services Director
PR-4 The City shall continue to pursue additional funding sources for parkland acquisition and improvements. Community Services
/Engineering
PR-5 The City shall pursue the joint use of public lands that are available and suitable for recreati6n purposes, Community Services
including flood control district, water district, and other utility properties. /Engineering
PR-6 The City shall seek to expand joint use agreements with school districts for recreation and community Community Services
service programs. /Engineering
PR-7 The City will encourage and actively support the development of public park improvements at the Community Services
regional and state levels, which will help to meet recreational demands of the City residents. /Engineering
PR-8 The City will rely on the Trails Implementation Plan as the basis for the application of trail standards and Planning/Engineering
design guidelines, prioritizing new trail development projects, and upgrading existing trail facilities.
PR-9 The City shall continue to allow trailway acreage to be credited towards meeting parkland dedication Planning/Engineering
standards.
PR-10 The City shall pursue the development of trails and facilities for equestrian use within the Planning
EquestriarffRural Area designation, as shown on the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan.
I I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit tb110-3~01.doc 24 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures : City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
PR-Il The City shall continue to pursue improvements to existing trails such as removing barriers, improving PlanningfEngincering
safety and function, and providing access to adjacent trails.
PR-12 Thc City shall continue to implement and maintain joint-use agreements with public and private utilities PlauningfEngincering
for the usc and maintenance of utility corridors for trail purposes.
AES-1 Preserve and enhance the special qualities of existing districts and neighborhoods through focused Planning
attention on land use, community design, and economic development.
AES-2 Continue to promote the establishment of entry monumentation as a means of stimulating community, Planning/Engineering
district and neighborhood identity.
AES-3 Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's comprehensive design guidelines for Planning
residential, commercial, and industrial development.
AES-4 Provide transition between the developed and natural (unbuilt) environment through landscaping Planning
techniques, open space linkages, preservation and landforms, and sensitive site planning and architectural
design.
AES-S Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong landscaped edge, provides a coherent Planning/Engineering
high-quality appearance along a particular route, and enhances the image of adjacent development.
AES-6 Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities wherever feasible to minimize the Planning/Engineering
unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures.
AES-7 Ensure that communication towers are located and designed to blend with the surrounding environment. Planning/Engineering
AES-8 Maintain the rural development pattern and character of the Etiwanda area through the Etiwanda Specific Planning
Plan.
I:~PLANNINO~FINAL\CITYCNCL[G PA 99-07m~t tb~ ~0-34~.do~ 25 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
AES-9 Develop mixed use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there is sensitive integration of land Planning
uses, convenient modes of transportation, and a focused "sense of place" that emanates from thc
architectural and landscape design.
AlES-10 On north-south roadways, open space corridors, and other locations where there arc views of scenic PlanningfEnginecring
resources, trees and structures should be used to frame and orient such views as key locations, and
obstruction of views should be kept to a minimum.
AES-11 Seek thc preservation of existing windrows, vineyards, and citrus groves where feasible and thc re- Planning
establishment of these special landscape clements within thc City.
I:~PLANNINOWINAL\CITYCNC L\O PA 99-07fait tb110-34)1 .doc 26 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
' ,~ Responsible for Monitoring
CR-1 It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following tasks prior to construction Planning
activities on any part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-influence:
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for prehistoric resources,
a field survey for prehistoric resources within portions of the project area not previously surveyed for
cultural resources shall be conducted.
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for sacred land resources,
the Native American Heritage Commission for information regarding sacred lands.
Inventory all prehistoric resources using appropriate State record forms and submit two (2) copies of
the completed forms to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center.
Evaluate the significance and integrity of all prehistoric resources within the project area, using
criteria established in Appendix K of the CEQA Guidelines for important archaeological resources.
If human remains are encountered on the project site, the San Bemardino County Coroner's Office
shall be contacted within 24 hours of the find, and all work should be halted until a clearance is given
by that office and any other involved agencies.
All resources and data collected within the project area should be permanently curated at an
appropriate repository within the County.
CR-2 If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will Planning
retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to
protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will:
Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification
without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value.
Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new
developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point.
I:~LANNING~FINAL\CITYCNC L\G PA 99-07mlt tb110-3-01 .doc 27 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamon~a General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENEILa. L PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible'for Monitoring
Pursue educating thc public about the area's archaeological heritage.
Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditional of approval (if a local government action)
to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources,
following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and
proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of thc completed report,
with original illustrations, to thc San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for
permanent archiving.
CR-3 Historic Archaeological Resources Planning
It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following tasks prior to construction
activities on any part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-influence:
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic resources, a
field survey for historical resources within po~ons of thc project area not previously surveyed for
cultural resources shall be conducted.
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic resources, the
San Bemardino County Archives shall be contacted for information on historical property records.
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for sacred land resources,
the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted for information regarding sacred lands.
Inventory all historical resources, including archaeological and historic resources older than 50 years,
using appropriate State record forms and following guidelines in the Califomia Office of Historic
Preservation's handbook "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources". The archaeologist will
then submit two (2) copies of the completed forms to the San Bemardino County Archaeological
Information Center for the assignment of trinomials.
Evaluate the sil~nificance and inte~rit,/of all historical resources within the project area, using criteria
~ I:~LANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mlt tb110-3-0l.doc 28 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City D~partment/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
established in Appendix K of thc CEQA Guidelines for important archaeological resources and/or 36
CFR 60.4 for eligibility for listing on thc National Register of Historic Places.
Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditional of approval (if a local government action)
to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique historical resources
following appropriate CEQA and/or National Historic Preservation Act's Section 106 gnidclincs.
Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and
proposed mitigation of resources within thc project area, following guidelines for Archaeological
Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation,
Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a), December 1989. Submit one copy'of the completed report, with
original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent
archiving.
CR--4 If any historical resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified Planning
archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve
them for study. In addition, the City of Rancho Cucamonga should:
Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification
without an opportunity for the City to establish its historic value.
Continue to implement the Landmark Designation Program and other programs that support
conservation of historical resources. Continue to require, where appropriate, the incorporation of
historic sites and buildings within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal
point.
Vigorously encourage the use of the State Historic Building Code on buildings of historic
significance that can allow modification without imposing some of the potentially detrimental
provisions of the current building codes.
Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage.
~ I:~PL~NNINO~FINAL\CITYCNC L~G pA 99-07mit tbl 10-34)1.doc 29 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
~ ' Mitigation Measures City DepartmentfDivisi~n
Responsible for Monitoring
CR-5 ! Paleontological Resources Planning
It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist conduct a preconstruction field survey of any project
site with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-influence that is underlain by Quaternary
alluvium. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific
recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be
appropriate.
CR-6 Should mitigation monitoring be recommended for a specific project within the area, the program must Planning
include but not be limited to the following measures:
Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with
minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities.
Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities
elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If cuns~ruction personnel make the discovery, the
grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find.
Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and
transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum).
Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with copy of
report to San Bernardino County Museum.
HMC-1 The City shall continue to support the County of San Bemardino's management of the Hazardous Fire
Materials Disclosure Program (HMDP) to identify and regulate businesses handling extremely hazardous
! materials, or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
HMC-2 The City shall continue to maintain and implement the Household Hazardous Waste Element, in Fire
accordance with State law, to provide handling and emergency response services for household
hazardous waste.
I:~PLANN~G~FINAL\CITYCNCL\G P A 99-07~it ~ ~-3-m.do* 30 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamongia General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
ltMC-3 The City shall continue to participate in the County-wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Engineering
System (NPDES) program to address storm water runoff, pollution prevention, and illegal discharge of
waste into storm drains in the community.
~ I:~PLANNING~INAL\CITYCNCL\G PA 994)7mit tbl 10-3-01.doe 31 Mitigation Monitoring Program
RESOLUTION NO 0/- 22 ?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conformance with the
requirements of State Law, adopted a complete General Plan and certified the Environmental
Impact Report for the General Plan on April 6, 1981, by the approval of Resolution No. 81-40.
2. After various amendments and partial updates, the City commenced the process of
preparing a comprehensive update of its General Plan in 1999. The process of updating the
General Plan has involved various departments of the City and included numerous meetings of
a General Plan Task Force, which was comprised of representatives from the City Council,
Planning Commission, staff and community members. As a result of that process, a draft
General Plan Update has now been completed.
3. An Initial Study was prepared for the General Plan Update (the "project") pursuant to
Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines by the Planning Department staff with the
assistance of the City's environmental consultant, Michael Brandman Associates. The Initial
Study, which was completed on May 22, 2000, identified that there was substantial evidence
that the project may have a significant impact on several environmental resources and
governmental services. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, a
decision was made to prepare an EIR for the project.
4. On May 22, 2000, a Notice of Preparation was prepared and sent to the State
Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California and to other
responsible agencies. The review period on the Notice of Preparation closed on July 7, 2000.
5. On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR was completed and made available for public
review. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of
Completion of the Draft EIR, which was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research.
Public Notice of Availability of the EIR and of the comment period was provided pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section 21092 and a copy of the Notice was posted in the office of the
County Clerk in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.3. The EIR was
circulated to interested agencies between June 22, 2001, and August 6, 2001, for a 45-day
comment period pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087. Comments were received
and responses prepared and incorporated into the EIR. A copy of the final EIR is on file in the
Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
6. On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public headng on the
General Plan Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Notice of the
time, place, and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in
accordance with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and 65090.
7. On September 19, and continued to October 3, 2001, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public hearing on the General Plan
Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Notice of the time, place,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-93 ' '
EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
September 26, 2001
Page 2
and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in accordance
with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and 65090.
7. The Final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this resolution consists of that
draft document dated June, 2001, entitled Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Draft
Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027), written comments on
that draft report, and written responses thereto submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, an Addendum to the EIR attached as Exhibit "A" of the September 12, 2001, staff
report of this item, and written testimony presented by City staff and the City's consultant during
the hearings on the recommended adoption of said General Plan Update insofar that the
testimony pertained to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-mentioned documents
will be referred to as "the Final EIR."
8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The Final EIR has been reviewed and considered by the City Council, prior to
making its recommendations on the General Plan Update, and the City Council finds, pursuant
to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance
with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. The City
Council further finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192.1 and State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15084(e), that the Final EIR has been independently analyzed by City staff
and the City Council, and that the Final EIR represents and reflects the independent judgment
of the City Council with respect to the project.
2. The additional information provided in the staff report accompanying the EIR, the
Addendum to the EIR, and Response to Comments provided in Exhibit "A" to the staff report,
and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony presented at the above-mentioned
hearing does not represent significant new information so as to require re-circulation of the EIR
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192.1.
3. Based on all of the findings, evidence, and information presented, the City Council
find, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15090, that the Final EIR has been completed
in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,
find that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192.1 and State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15084(e), that the Final EIR has been independently analyzed by the City and
represents and reflects the independent judgment of the City with respect to the project; and
then certify the Final EIR.
TH E C I T Y OF
I~AN Cii 0 CU CAH 0 N GA
Memorandum
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manag~'~
FROM: WilliamJ. O'Neil, City Engine~'/~-/
SUBJECT: OCTOBER 3, 2001 - CITY C(~J~ICIL AGENDA ITEM G-l: FORMATION
OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 FOR TRACTS
14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522,
14498, 14497, 15838 AND 15902, LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROUTE
30 BETVVEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND HANLEY AVENUE,
SUBMI'I-I'ED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
Staff has received a letter from Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, regarding the Formation of
Landscape Maintenance District No 10. The developer is requesting that the City
Council proceedings scheduled for tonight, October 3, 2001, be continued to the
November 7, 2001, City Council meeting.
WJO/dlw
Attachment
§109 ~ast La Palina, Suite D
Anaheim, CA 92807
{7Z4) 693~6700 Fax (714) 693-6730
October 3, 2001
Mr. Robert Lemon
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Ccnt~ Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Rig: Landscape Maintenance District Formation
Dear Robert,
We would like to request that the City Council precedings scheduled for tonight, October 3, 2001,
regarding the formation of Landscape Maintenanoe District Number 10, bc continued to the City
Council meting o£Noveanber 7, 2001.
We arc.in poss'ession of the ballots and will mmm them prior to the meeting of November 7, 2001.
Tbmflc ~;ou for your assistance. ' .....
Rancho Etiwada 6~5, LLC
Todd Ku.rtin Brace Eli¢ff
Member Member
Joe O'Ncil
Dan lamm
File
R A N C H O C U C a M 0 N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT
Staff Report' '
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 FOR
TRACTS 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522,
14498, 14497, 15838 AND 15902, LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROUTE 30
BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND HANLEY AVENUE, SUBMITTED
BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution declaring the results
of the assessment ballot tabulation, forming Landscape Maintenance District No. 10,
ordering maintenance work therein and providing for the levy of annual assessments.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Tracts 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497,
15838 and 15902 comprise the "University" portion of the previously proposed
"University/Crest" development. The University/Crest Project Planned Development was
previously subject to land use entitlements resulting from the County of San Bernardino's
approval in 1991 of PUD No. W121-49. On October 26, 1999, the County approved
revisions to the University/Crest PD, including separating the University portion of the
University/Crest PD from the Crest portion. Subsequently, the City and Property Owner
approved a Settlement, Pre-Annexation and Tolling Agreement, dated June 27, 2000.
As a condition of entering into the Settlement and Pre-Annexation Agreement, the City and
Property Owner agreed to enter into a Development Agreement that was ultimately
executed on September 6, 2000, via the City Council's adoption of Ordinance No. 621.
One provision of the Development Agreement requires the formation of the necessary
Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts for the Revised University Project
development, subsequently renamed the Rancho Eitwanda development. The parties
involved agreed that the LMD's must be established no later than the recordation of the
final tract map. The Property Owner, in preparation of the recordation of associated tract
72
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10
OCTOBER 3, 2001
PAGE 2
maps, petitioned the City Council to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 10. The City
Council, at its meeting of September 19, 2001, initiated the formation proceedings,
approved the Assessment Engineer's Report, and declared its intent to form LMD No. 10.
The boundary of proposed Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 generally encompasses
the area north of State Route 30, between Day Creek Channel and Hanley Avenue,
extending northerly to the city limits. The exact boundary is detailed on the accompanying
exhibit. The District will be formed with Tracts 14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1,
14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 and 15902. Additional tracts within this
district boundary will be annexed at the time of recordation.
Assessment ballots were mailed to all affected property owners on September 24, 2001.
The returned ballots will be tabulated at the public hearing following the close of the public
input portion. If a majority protest does not exist, the Council may proceed with the
formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 10.
Respectfully Submitted,
City Engineer
W JO:ri
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 0 l- g g t]
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING THE FORMATION
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND
THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 AND CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE PROVIISONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council by its Resolution No. 01-211 initiated proceedings,
and by its Resolution No. 01-213 declared its intention to form Rancho Cucamonga Landscape
Maimenance District No. 10 (the "District") and to levy and collect assessments against lots and
parcels of land within such District pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing
with Section 22500 (the "Act"), to pay for the costs and expenses of operating, maintaining and
servicing ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities located within public
places within the boundaries of the District; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer selected by the City Council has prepared and filed
with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council, a report in connection
with the proposed formation of the District and collection of assessments against lots and parcels
of land within the District, and the City Council did by previous resolution approve such report
(the "Engineer's Report"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to form the District and levy and collect
assessments against lots and parcels of land within the District for the fiscal year commencing
July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002, to pay for the costs and expenses of operating,
maintaining, and servicing ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities located
within public places within the boundaries of the District; and
WHEREAS, the property owner has submitted a signed and notarized petition
waiving their rights to the forty-five day notice period for the public hearing on the proposed
District.
7'7'
Resolution No.
October 3, 2001
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City has conducted a mailed ballot election in connection with
the levy of assessments within the District in accordance with Article XIII D of the California
Constitution, and has tabulated ballots in accordance with the "City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District, Procedures for the Completion, Return, and
Tabulation of Assessment Ballots".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Following notice duly given, the City Council has held a full and fair
public hearing regarding its Resolution No. 2001- , the Engineer's Report prepared in
connection with the proposed District and the levy and collection of assessments, and considered all
oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons.
Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist
as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution with respect to the
District. All oral and written protests and objections to the formation of this District and the
proposed levy and collection of assessments are hereby overruled by the City Council.
Section3. Based upon its review of the Engineer's Report, a copy of which has
been presented to the City Council and which has been filed with the City Clerk, and other reports
and information, the City Council hereby fmds and detemaines with respect to the District included
in the modified Engineer's Report, that:
(i) the land within the District will be specially benefited by the operation,
maintenance and servicing of ornamental structures, landscaping, including
trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation, and appurtenant
facilities, including irrigation systems, drainage devices, and drywells,
located in public places within the bonndades of the District; and
(ii) the District includes all lands so specially benefited;
(iii)the net amount to be assessed upon the lots and parcels within the District in
accordance with the assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001
and ending June 30, 2002 is apportioned by a formula and method which
fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in
proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each lot or parcel
from the improvements; and
Resolution No.
October 3, 2001
Page 3
(iv) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any parcel,
which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred
on that parcel.
Section 4. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be
made as set forth in the Engineer's Report, which improvements are briefly described as follows:
The operation, maintenance and servicing of omamental sla'uctures, landscaping, including trees,
shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation
systems, drainage devices and drywells located in public places within the boundaries of the
District. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant
facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the omamental structures,
landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the
landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease
or injury; the removal of mings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning,
sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing
means the fumishing of water and electricity for the irrigation and control of the landscaping and
the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures or appurtenant facilities.
Section 5. The City Council hereby confirms the diagrams and assessments set
forth in the Engineer's Report. The maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental
structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities shall be performed pursuant to law. Commencing
with Fiscal Year 2001/2002, the County Auditor of San Bemardino County shall enter on the
County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of the assessment, and such
assessments shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are
collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessment after deduction of any
compensation due the County for collection shall be paid to the City Treasurer. For Fiscal Year
2001/2002, the City's representative is hereby authorized and directed to collect such assessments.
Section 6. The assessments are in compliance with the provisions of the Act
and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and the City Council has complied with all laws
pertaining to the levy of annual assessments pursuant to the Act and Article XIII D of the California
Constitution.
Section 7. The assessments are levied for the purpose of paying the costs and
expenses of the improvements described in Section 5, above, for Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Section 8. The City Treasurer shall deposit all money representing assessments
collected for the District to the credit of a special fund known as "Improvement Fund, City of
Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10" and such money shall be expended
only for the maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental structures, landscaping and
appurtenant facilities as described in Section 5 above.
Resolution No. 2-
October 3, 2001
Page 4
Section 9. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments
for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002.
Section 10. A certified copy of the diagrams and assessments shall be filed in the
office of the City Clerk and shall be open for public inspection.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3a day of October, 2001 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
James Markman, City Attorney
77
the city of
I
Rancho Cucamonga
Staff Report
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Pri'ncipal Planner
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION 01-01 - A request to approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for
annexation proceedings (LAFCO No. 2879) between the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 322 acres of
the San Bernardino County unincorporated area, generally located north of
25th Street between Day Creek Channel and East Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution approving the Tax Revenue Exchange
between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACKGROUND
The Tax Revenue Exchange negotiation is part of the annexation proceedings before the Local
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates located in the
unincorporated area of the County (Exhibit "A"). Approval of the Property Tax Revenue Exchange
by the City and the County is a prerequisite of the annexation proceedings.
The County of San Bernardino uses a formula to determine property tax allocation for annexations.
The estimated property tax revenue received by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for this area is
5.189656 percent. The formula for the tax is similar with prior tax rate exchanges previously agreed
to and adopted by the City Council for other annexed projects.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ANNEXATION 01-01
October 3, 2001
Page 2
Additionally, in order to ensure a neutral fiscal impact to the City, the developer is required to form a
Community Facilities District (CFD) for all public improvements within the project area. The CFD
will ensure financing for storm drains, park improvements and acquisition, school facilities,
construction of neighborhood monuments at major entry points as well as landscape maintenance
for all major streets, and other related costs.
CONCLUSION
Adoption of the attached Resolution determining thb amount of property tax revenue exchanged
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County is required to proceed with
annexation proceedings for the subject properties.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:LJH\Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A"-Vicinity Map
Resolution
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
L S A FIGURE 5.2-4~
K pROPOSEDPROJECTSITE · ~r~ PROPOSEDOFF-S]TEMITIGATION Rflrlcho
172 AC RE PARCEL Supplemental
REVISED UNIVERSITY pROJECT ~ PROPOSED OFF-SITE MITIGATION
~ IIOACREPARCEL
:~ ~,~o~c~o ~c~o~
;SOURCE: USGS 7.5' QUAD - CUCAMONGA PEAK, CA. 19~ I.
Pla~ of Se~ic~
Rancho Etiwanda gstat~ E X h i b i t "A"
RESOLUTION NO. O/- 22,.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT
OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETVVEEN AND
AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL
CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAFCO NO. 2879.
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga herebyfinds and determines that:
a. Pursuant to Section 99 of the Tax Revue and Taxation Code, prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Filing by the Local Agency Formation Commission Executive Officer, the governing
bodies of all local agencies whose service area or service responsibilities will be altered by a
proposed jurisdictional change shall negotiate and determine by resolution the amount of property
tax revenues to be exchanged between and among such local agencies.
b. Except as provided in Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, in the event that
a jurisdictional change would affect the service area or service responsibility of one or more special
districts, the Board of Supervisors shall, on behalf of the district or districts, negotiate any exchange
of property tax revenues.
c. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Board of Supervisors of the
County of San Bernardino have determined the amount of property tax revenues to be exchanged
as a result of the following jurisdictional change(s):
LAFCO 2879 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Annexation No. 01-01
(Rancho Etiwanda Estates)
SECTION 2.: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves and orders that:
a. The negotiated exchange of property tax revenue between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein by reference, resulting from the above-described jurisdictional change(s) is approved and
accepted.
b. The annual tax increment generated in the area subject to the jurisdictional change and
attributable to the local agencies whose service area of service responsibilities will be altered by the
proposed jurisdiction change shall be allocated in future years pursuant to the provisions of Section
98 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
SECTION 3: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify the passage of this
resolution and to cause a certified copy to be sent to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Califomia,
by the following vote:
EXHIBITA
City of Rancho Cucamonga Annexation No. 01-01
(Rancho Etiwanda Estates)
LAFCO 2879
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Percent in Major TRA ~ · . ~:; . ~
5.189656% ~ ~ "~
TRA # 7O007
ASSESSED VALUE $ 3,221,712
TAX REVENUE $ 32,217
CHANGE IN
BASE YEAR
2000-01
COUNTY:
General Operations $ (166)
Flood Control Zone #2
Flood Control Administration
Library $ (470)
TOTAL COUNTY $ (636)
OTHER AFFECTED AGENCIES:
CSA 70 Countywide $ (871)
GRAND TOTAL $ (1,507)
TRANSFER TO CITY $ 1,507
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
i
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Stafl Report
DATE: October 3, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P. City Manager ~..
FROM: Rodney Hoops, Chief of Police
BY: David Lau, Administrative Lieutenant
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $83,118.00, AWARDED BY THE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ,JUSTICE LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
Approve acceptance of a grant award in the amount of $83,118.00, and receipt the
same into Police Department Revenue Account # 1367000-4740. Additionally,
matching funds of $9,235.00 to be appropriated from Expenditure Account # 1001701-
9000 to meet the grant requirements. Total appropriation of $ 92,353.00 to be made out
of Expenditure Account # 1367701-5603.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The United States Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program
has offered the Police Department funds for equipment and other special needs. This
will be the sixth year that the City has received these awards. These funds have been a
great benefit to the law enforcement operations in the City.
The award approved by the United States Department of Justice~would allow the
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to obtain equipment as outlined below.
FISCAL IMPACT
$83,118.00 in grant funds would be appropriated for the requested equipment along
with $9,235.00 in matching funds (1/9th match) required by this grant.
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT - 2001/2002
October 2001
Page Two
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The law requires that each law enforcement agency receiving local law enforcement
grant funds must establish an Advisory Committee to approve the allocation of the
funds. For the past five years, this Committee has consisted of the following members:
Jack Lam, City Manager, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Public Official)
Dennis Cole, Superior Court Judge (Judiciary)
Rodney Hoops, Police Chief (Law Enforcement)
Richard Maxwell, Supervising District Attorney (District Attorney)
Sonya Yates, Superintendent of Schools (Public Education)
Diane Lee-Mitchell, Director YMCA (Community Member)
On September 17, 2001, the Advisory Committee met and approved the proposed
purchases for the 2001/2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
PROPOSED ITEM FOR PURCHASE
Emergency Vehicle Preemption Devices $ 41,592.83
In every U.S. city today, emergency vehicles will lose valuable time when
responding to the scene of an emergency. This is usually the result of traffic
congestion, inattentive drivers or motorists that just don't hear or see the
emergency vehicle. The preemption systems will get emergency vehicles rapidly
and safely to emergencies through traffic congestion, by giving emergency
vehicles green lights. The emergency preemption systems decrease emergency
response times, reduce accidents, reduce stress on emergency vehicle drivers
and assist emergency vehicles more safely to their emergencies, thus saving
more lives and property.
Thermal Image Cameras $ 44,182.50
The Builard Thermal Imager is a tool that will greatly enhance officers and
most importantly citizen safety in a number of applications in our city. It allows
personnel to locate victims/suspects when visibility is Iow or non-existent.
This is accomplished with the use of "Thermal Imaging" technology you may
have seen on law enforcement footage on television usually mounted on a
helicopter. This allows us to see an image of a subject or material generated
in reference to the heat given off by their body. This allows a subject to be
-2-
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT - 2001/2002
October 2001
Page Three
PROPOSED ITEM FOR PURCHASE (continued)
Thermal Image Cameras (continued)
located quickly and many times without them even realizing they have been
located. This camera is handheld and very versatile. It will cut the time
officers take to locate victims/suspects in critical incidents.
Accessories for Searchcam2000 $ 6,077.24
The Searchcam2000 was purchased under the LLEBG fiscal year 1999/2000.
The additional accessories requested are remote display, extended operation
battery set, video display extension cable and boot replacement kit.
Total Purchases $ 91,852.57
-3-
R A N h O C U C A M O N G A
~GINEEI~ING DE PAI~T~EN T
DATE: October 3, 2001
T~. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III
Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer
SUKIF, C~: Report on Ordinance 58
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Attorney to draft revisions to Ordinance 58
such that the current threshold for building addition exemptions is increased and new exemptions
regarding sidewalk construction and street light installation are incorporated into the ordinance. It is
further recommended that City Council request the Planning Commission to review the Utility
Undergrounding Resolution to limit its applicability to new construction.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Ordinance 58 requires development applicants to construct public improvements as a means of
mitigating impacts and ensuring public health, safety and welfare. In many cases, the ordinance is
the only means by which the City can effectuate compliance of certain areas with current city
standards. Staff has reviewed the ordinance, per the direction of the City Council, in response to
concerns from the business community. The review concluded that the ordinance's requirements are
consistent, in terms of financial impact, with the development requirements of other Southern
California cities researched for comparison. In addition, Ordinance 58 provides many exemptions to
its requirements.
However, staff has determined that the ordinance can be made less burdensome to minor
development applications through the modification of the building addition exemption and the
inclusion of new exemptions for sidewalk construction and street light installation. Current
exemptions for building additions place the thresholds above which a development applicant must
construct public improvements at 500 square feet and 1,000 square feet for commercial and
industrial additions, respectively. Current exem. ptions for sidewalk construction are limited to
developments located on streets specifically exempted by City Council resolution.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Report on Ordinance 58
October 3, 2001
Page 2
Staff recommends the preparation of the following revisions to Ordinance 58:
Increase the threshold for exemptions for building additions to 2,500 square feet for
commercial/office additions and to 10,000 square feet for industrial additions
· Add an exemption for sidewalk construction where strict compliance with the
requirement will cause practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship, as determined by
the City Engineer
· Add an exemption for street light installation for frontages less than 500 feet, per the
approval of the City Engineer
The Public Works Subcommittee has reviewed and concurs with the proposed revisions to
Ordinance 58.
Staff and the Subcommittee also reviewed the Planning Commission's Utility Undergrounding
Resolution. The undergrounding of utilities is not a requirement within Ordinance 58, however it is
often mistakenly identified by the development community as part of the ordinance. Limiting the
applicability of this resolution to new construction can provide additional financial relief to minor
development applications. The narrowing of the resolution's scope of applicability will exempt all
residential and commercial expansion/addition projects from-the payment of undergrounding in-lieu
fees that often represent a substantial cost to small businesses and residents.
The Public Works Subcommittee agreed with staff's recdmmendation that the City Council direct
the Planning Commission to review and revise the ~xisting Utility Undergrounding Resolution to
limit its applicability to new construction.
Respectfully Submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:rl
Ordinance 58 Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Division
Types of Improvements
~ Ordinance 58
Sldewalks/(urb & =utte~
Street pax, ing/~ idening
Street trees
Street lights
Drainage Structures
Rizht of way dedication
Ordinance 58 Applicability
All new construction
I~ Additions
,Residential: > 650 s.f.
,Commercial: > 500 s.f.
· Industrial: > 1000 s.f.
Cost Impacts to Developer
Case Study - Amcast Industrial Bldg
~NEC Jersey Blvd& White' Oa¢'l
Cost Impacts to Developer
Case Study - Amcast (MDR 96-15)
· Proposed: 2,350 s.f. addition
· Off-site Requirements:
· Full-width paving
· Parkway improvements
· Drainage improvements
· Addition cost: $86,000
· Off-site Requirements: $41,000
Ordinance 58 Recommendations
~ Exemptions
~Commercial Bldg Addition: < 2,500 s.f.
Industrial Bldg Addition: < 10,000 s.f
Additional sidewalk exemption
Street light exemption: < 500 1.f.
Utility Undergrounding
Resolution
All new construction
~ Single-family residence exempt
Conclusions
Benefits of revised policies
~ Ease financial burden
I~ Promotion of commercial/industrial
expansion
Primary beneficiaries
~ Small business owners
~No impact to major development