HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/10/17 - Agenda Packet - Agenda RANCH!DT'G ,-CAMO N GA
10500 Civi~ ~nter. Drive
Ra cho ~ucamonga, CA 9~730
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AG[NDAS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1ST and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
OCTOBER 17, 2001
Aqencv, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ............................... Member
Grace Curatalo ......................... Member
Bob Dutton .............................. Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. IVlarkman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency iVieefing ...... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District i~leeting... Council Chambers
Regular City Council i~ieeting ...................... Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane
Curatalo__ Dutton , and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring October 23-31, 2001, as Red
Ribbon Week in Rancho Cucamonga.
2. Presentation of Certificates to Red Ribbon Week Button Design Winner
and Honorable Mention.
3. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of Crime Prevent[on Week
2001.
4. Presentation of Certificates to Crime Prevention Community Heroes.
5. Presentation of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library's Community
Flag Tribute in honor of the September 11th Tragedy.
6. Introduction of Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga's new Police
Chief.
C~ COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: September 19, 2001
October 3, 2001
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/26/01 and 10/3/01 and Payroll 1
ending 9/29/01 for the total amount of $3,088,714.67.
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
2
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 23
September 30, 2001.
4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 29
6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Hellman Avenue to Archibald
Avenue, 1o be funded from Account No. 11823035650/1324182-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-228 3'1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "6TM STREET
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE"
IN SAID CITY, AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 36
Banyan Street right turn lane west of Milliken Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-229 :38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BANYAN
STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF
MILLIKEN AVENUE" IN SAID CITY, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
6. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment. 43
7. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the Etiwanda Area Master 47
Plan for FY 2000/2001 and to appropriate $17,345.00 for Fund
1116303-5650.
8. Approval for the purchase of four (4) Ford F-250 heavy duty super cab 48
trucks with utility bodies from Raceway Ford, Riverside, in the amount
of $105,509.10, funded from Fund 1712-001-5604, and the purchase of
two (2) Ford F-250 heavy duty trucks with dump beds from Fritts Ford,
Riverside, in the amount of $49,885.16, funded from Funds: 1134-3-
3,5604, 1133-303-5604, and 1712-001-5604.
9. Approval for the purchase of computer hardware for the Citywide 49
downstream program update and replacement, from Future Computing
Solutions, Inc. (CO 01-086), as the lowest responsible bidder, in the
amount of $254,920.61 from Account 1714001-5605 as approved in the
FY 2001/02 budget.
,~ City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
3
10. Approval for the replacement purchase of two (2) Elgin Broom Bear 50
Street Sweepers from Haaker Equipment Company of Pomona,
California (CO 01-087) through a Piggy Back/Cooperative Purchase
Agreement with the City of Alhambra, California, funded from Account
No. 1-712-001-5603 in the amount of $298,226.50.
11. Approval for the application of funds for the Napa Soccer Site Complex
project from the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Urban Open Space and 51
Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water,
Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-230 53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN
SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM
UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS,
CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL
PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
12. Approval of Resolution of the City Council authorizing grant applications 57
for funding of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail project.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-231 59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAILS
PROJECT FROM THE RECREATIONAL
TRAILS PROGRAM
RESOLUTION NO. 01-232 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAILS
PROJECT FROM THE NON-MOTORIZED
TRAILS PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER,
CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION
BOND ACT OF 2000
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
4
13. Approval of Environmental Assessment for Pacific Electric Inland 6'1
Empire Trail - A review to determine if the project may have a
significant effect on the environment. The proposed project is the
development of approximately seven miles of the Pacific Electric Inland
Empire Trail, a Class I, multi-use bicycle, pedestrian, and separated
equestrian trail, located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right-
of-way, which varies in width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city
limits of Rancho Cucamonga. The project includes the acquisition of
the historic Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum and
trailhead, and the potential acquisition or use of the historic Casa de
Cucamonga, for use as a trailhead. The total area of development of
the trail is approximately 85 acres. The total area of development
associated with the use of the Etiwanda Station for preservation as a
museum and as a staging area for the trail is approximately four acres;
for a total of 89 acres of development. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
14. Approval of an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement '105
with the County of San Bernardino, the cities of Claremont, Fontana, La
Verne, Rialto, San Bernardino, and Upland that formed the corridor
design authority for the Route 30 Freeway Corridor between La Verne
and San Bemardino, adding Montclair as a member of the Authority and
adding the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail as a project of the
authority.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-233 "107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT FOR THE CORRIDOR DESIGN
AUTHORITY
15. Approval to adopt a Resolution consenting to a joint public hearing on 110
the Redevelopment Plan for Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment
Plan and the Negative Declaration for the Rancho Redevelopment
Project.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-234 'l'12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO A JOINT
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE
RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
5
16. Approval for the application of funds for the Regina Winery Museum 113
project from the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museums,
and Facilities for Wildlife Education or Environmental Education
Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air,
and Coast Protection Bond Act of 2000.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-235 115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR
URBAN RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL
CENTERS, MUSEUMS, AND FACILITIES FOR
WILDLIFE EDUCATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL
EDUCATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN AIR, AND
COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
17. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the Contract in the amount of $125,381.67 ($113,983.34 117
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, R.J. Noble Company
(CO 01-088), for the construction of the Marine Avenue (Humboldt Ave.
th th
to 26 St.) and 26 Street (Center Avenue to Haven Avenue) Pavement
Rehabilitation, to be funded from AB2928 Traffic Congestion Relief
Fund 182, Account No. 11823035650/1256182-0 and Account No.
11823035650/1325182-0.
18. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the 121
execution of the contract in the amount of $609,709.10 ($554,281.00
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Herman Weissker,
Inc. (CO 01-089), for the construction of the Lower Hermosa Avenue
Phase I Utility Underground and Street Light Improvements from 4th
th
Street to approximately 350 feet south of 8 Street, to be funded from
RDA funds, Account No. 26408015602.
19. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance 126
Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP 98-32,
submitted by Cardlock Fuels System, Inc., located on the east side of
Charles Smith Avenue, north of Marino Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-236 '128
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 98-32 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
6
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
1. AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 - RANCHO
ETIWANDA 685, LLC - A request to modify certain sections of the 129
Development Agreement regarding the timing of construction of specific
infrastructure improvements before issuance of certain building permits
for property generally located north of Interstate 210, between Hanley
Avenue and Day Creek Channel - Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through
14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902.
ORDINANCE NO. 671 (first reading) 135
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02, A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC, FOR THE
PURPOSE OF MODIFYING CERTAIN
SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT REGARDING THE TIMING OF
THE CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIFIC
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH
OF INTERSTATE 210, EAST OF HANLEY
AVENUE AND WEST OF DAY CREEK
CHANNEL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 14493
THROUGH 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, AND
15902
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
7
2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL 146
IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of
Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft City of Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan Update. The Project Planning Area
encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as
its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located nodh
of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations as
well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements of the
City's General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction
of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182
acres in non-residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-
residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is
increased by 18 acres. Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a
reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres
in non-residential uses. With the implementation of the proposed
General Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would
occur with build out: approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately
9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square
feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and
approximately 231 acres of aderials/freeways. The Project/Planning
Area includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to
the north. The City is located in the southwest corner of San
Bernardino County 13 miles west of downtown San Bernardino. The
San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of
Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and
east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is
approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-
Influence is approximately 7,700 acres. Total project/planning area
comprises approximately 31,700 acres. During theses public hearings
the City Council will consider the Final EIR and proposed statements of
overriding considerations. Certification of the Final EIR and final action
on the General Plan Update will occur after the close of the public
hearings. (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3, 2001)
RESOLUTION NO. 01-237 150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2001
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM, MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND MAKING
ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW
RESOLUTION NO. 01-238 16,5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
8
3. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 200
DR02001-00505 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend the Very Low Residential District lot development standards,
and to amend the Hillside Development grading standards, to facilitate
horse keeping.
CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request to
amend the Very Low and Estate Residential Districts lot basic
development standards to facilitate horse keeping. Related File:
Development Code Amendment DR02001-00505.
ORDINANCE NO. 672 (first reading) 210
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505,
AMENDING LOT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO
HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 673 (first reading) 218
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-
00549, AMENDING LOT BASIC
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY
LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA
SPECIFIC PLAN, PERTAINING TO HORSE
KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
G_~. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL 221
PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES1 IN CONNECTION WITH THE
PROPOSED DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ET AL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
City Council Agenda
October 17, 2001
9
RESOLUTION NO. 01-239 230
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC
PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION
WITH THE PROPOSED DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD ET AL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 243
UPDATE
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on October 11, 2001, seventy two (72) hours prior
to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive
September 19, 2001
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meetinq
A, CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, September 19, 2001
in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:17 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linde D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Flavio Nunez, Assistant RDA Analyst;
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II1: Joe O'Neil, City
Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Brad Buller,
City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Alan Brock, Plan Check ManagedBuilding; Larry
Temple, Administrative Services Director; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis,
Information Systems Specialist; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District;
Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Library
Services Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificates & Savings Bonds to the "2001 Earth Day Essay & Poster Contest
Winners and Teachers."
Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, talked about the contest and introduced the winners.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution,
recognizing "Constitution Week."
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Louise Sorenson and Helen Barter.
B3. Presentation of Proclamation to Stater Bros. Markets in commemoration of their 65th Anniversary
serving Southern California.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Dan Benart.
Mr. Benart stated the event was almost canceled, but they decided go to forward with it. He said they
were dedicating this to those people that lost their lives and added they have collected about $250,000
over the weekend. He stated they are taking a collection at their stores to send to the Red Cross.
B4. Added Item - Presentation of Proclamations to two Little League Divisions for winning the Section
7 Championships (Alta Loma Little League Junior and Senior Divisions)
Doug Morris was called up to assist with the presentation of the Proclamations to the team members and
coaches.
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page 2
Mayor Alexander read the Proclamation and presented one to each division.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Bob Curtis, 9171 Camelia Court, asked that the City acquire the Etiwanda Station located on
Etiwanda Avenue and the Old Pacific Electric Right-of-Way in Rancho Cucamonga. He felt the
structure and the 5 acres of land would provide a great stop for the people using the trail. He hoped
that it could be turned into a museum, snack shop, etc. for the entire historical area.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Minutes: July 10, 2001 (Special Meeting - Biane & Curatalo absent)
August 30, 2001 (Special Meeting ~ Biane & Curatalo absent)
September 5, 2001
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/29/01 and 9/5/01 and Payroll ending 8/26/01 for the total
amount of $2,040,656.98.
D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2001.
D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "FY 2001/2001 Bus Bay
Improvements at Various Locations", to be funded from Account Nos. 11052085650/1238105-0 and
12143035650/1293214-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FY 2001/2002 BYS BAY IMPROVEMENTS
AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
DS. Approval of Notice of Partial Assignment of Development Agreement No. 00-02 from Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC to MBK Homes Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Lennar Homes of California,
Inc., a California Corporation, Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, KB Home Greater
Los Angeles, Inc., a California Corporation, and Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., a
Colorado Corporation.
D6. Approval of Parcel Map 15651, located at the terminus of Rochester Court and on the west side of
Charles Smith Avenue, south of 6th Street, submitted by Paragon Rochester, LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-202
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
15651 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15651)
D7. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Monumentation Cash Deposit
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map No. 15492, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and
Terra Vista Parkway.
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 01-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER
15492 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
RESOLUTION NO. 01-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
4 TRACT MAP NUMBER 15492
D8. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 & 6 for DR 00-
59, located at the southwest corner of 8th St. and Rochester Ave., east of Buffalo Ave., submitted by
Opus West Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-205
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY DR 00-59
RESOLUTION NO. 01-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 00-59
D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP
00-31, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian Street, submitted by Peter K.
Vagenas and James Kefallinos.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-207
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 00-31
RESOLUTION NO. 01-208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR CUP 00-31
D10. Approval to summarily vacate and authorize the signing of a Grant Deed for releasing the excess
portions of Miller Avenue west of the intersection of 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue as required by
Church Gardens -APN: 227-211-07, 28, and 43 (V-182)
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 01-209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION
AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A GRANT DEED FOR
RELEASING THE EXCESS PORTIONS OF MILLER AVENUE WEST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF 1-15 AND ETIWANDA AVENUE (V-18) APN:
227-221-07, 28, AND 43
D11. Approval of a request to summarily vacate the unpaved 7th Street (20t~ Street) be~een Hermosa
Avenue and Deer Creek Channel, V-181, by Paragon Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-210
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF UNUSED 7TM STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE
AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL
D12. Approval to authorize the execution of Program Supplement No. 003-M to the Administering
Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420 (CO 01-081) covering In-Roadway Warning Lights Installation at
19th Street and Jasper Street.
D13. Approval to initiate formation proceedings for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 for Tracts
14496, 14496-1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 and 15902,
located north of State Route 30 be~een Day Creek Channel and Hanley Avenue, submitted by Rancho
Etiwanda 685, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15
OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS APPROVED BY
ARTICLE XlII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION; AND
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
RESOLUTION NO. 01-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE
REPORT OF THE ENGINEER IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL
OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION
OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT T THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF THE DIVISION 15 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE
XllI D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 01-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER
THE APPROVAL OF THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENT WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE
XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, AND APPOINTING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS
D14. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance
Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for CUP 99-10, submitted by evergreen Devco,
Inc., (Walgreen's), located n the southeast corner of 19t~ and Carnelian Streets.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-10 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE F COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Biane seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items SubmiEed.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
FI. LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00369 AND NOTICE OF EXEMPTION - JOSEPH AND J. L.
WALKER - An application to desiqnate the Krysto Ranch House and property as a Historic Landmark and
a request to file a Notice of Exemption under the CEQA Guidelines per Article 19, Section 15308, located
at 5917 Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-152-15 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER $, 2001)
RESOLUTION NO. 01-200
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
DRC2001-00369, DESIGNATING THE KRYSTO RANCH A HISTORIC
LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-152-15
Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. He indicated this was continued in order to
allow the applicant the opportunity to speak about this item. He also referred to a letter from Robert
Pasma that was distributed to the Council which is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page 6
Luana Hernandez, 6797 Hellman, stated they have a historical home and love it very much. She
hopes the Council will approve the request to designate this a historic home. She felt the
historical homes should be shared with the community.
John Ellis, speaking on behalf of Joe and Linda Walker, stated they want to save this historical
home as well as the eucalyptus trees by declaring it with a historical landmark status. He stated
possibly in the future they may apply for a CUP, but that is in the future. He stated the Walkers
have searched to see if this can be a wedding venue by talking to the City and an architect. He
stated the architect had talked with the neighbors in the area. He added staff told him this is not
zoned commercial, but added they could apply for the historic landmark and that it would help to
save the trees. He continued to talk about the process they went through to turn this into a
historic landmark. He stated they are concerned about the neighbors and want to make sure they
create no traffic problems on Archibald. He asked that the Council make this a historic landmark.
He added he is aware the landmark designation does not give him the authority to start
construction.
Councilmember Dutton stated he does not want him to think because the historic landmark designation is
approved he can go ahead with a project.
Mr. Ellis stated he understands this.
Councilmember Williams asked him if he felt staff told him he would be able to proceed if he is granted
the designation.
Mr. Ellis stated he was not told this.
Councilmember Dutton asked him if he knows the process to obtain a CUP.
Mr. Ellis stated they are working with their team and talking to City staff.
Councilmember Wlliams felt they should get professional assistance if they pursue the CUP.
Russ Warner, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, stated they only found out about this a few weeks
ago. He stated they do not see the Walkers as good neighbors.
Joel Cascadden, 9729 Sunflower, stated this is a complete shock to them. He has written a letter
and asked for the Council to come to the area to see this. He felt they could take pride in this
property without it being designated a historic landmark. He stated he objects to the landmark
status.
Craig Welch, 9715 Sunflower, stated he also opposes this designation. He felt if this is approved,
they would have to be back whenever it changes owners.
Shawn Stone, 9728 Sunflower, stated he does not agree with a commercial use of this property
and stated he would not like that around his house. He stated he has not ever been contacted by
the owners to talk about their plans for the property.
Helen Neal wanted to know why this building is history and questioned the tax break they would
get. She stated she is against the historic landmark.
Demara Nuzum, 9719 Manzanita, felt there should be an EIR done before the project is
approved. She stated she has never been contacted. She stated everyone knows now what
their intent is. She felt the EIR should have been done first.
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page '7
Devon Hartman, architect, talked about the process they have gone through. He asked that the
discussion stick with the historic landmark designation. He felt the people should talk to the
planners of the City.
There being no further input, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Williams asked about the size of the property and asked if they could build another
building on it even if they are not given the designation.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they could.
Councilmember Williams continued to inquire what could be done with the property.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated the historic designation is identification of the property and that it has a
criteria that nothing can occur on the property without review by the Historic Preservation Commission.
Councilmember Biane inquired about a permit process to demolition a structure.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated if this is not historically designated and there is enough property
there, and there is enough value in the land as distinguished from the old house, they can demolish that
building on a ministerial permit application, which means there is no discretion and all they have to do is
meet the building code requirements for doing a demolition. He added they can clear off the property and
subdivide it to make two lots.
Councilmember Dutton asked if when people want to make a piece of property a historic landmark could
we require them to submit their plans for the preservation of the property as a condition of the
designation.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated not everyone has an idea of what they are going to do with the property
and that this may be a burden on the owner.
Councilmember Wdliams inquired if there is a business license permit.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they have a Home Occupancy Permit for office use only.
Councilmember Curatalo stated she sympathizes with the neighbors, but felt it should be a historic
landmark.
Mayor Alexander stated he does not oppose the historic landmark, but did not agree with making this
commercial. He felt the owners would have a big hurdle to get this approved.
Councilmember Williams stated she did not agree with the commemial use, but would like to see it
protected as it is now. She stated she would like to protect the home.
MOTION: Moved by Councilmember Dutton to deny the designation because of the owner's intent to
develop this into a commemial use.
Councilmember Williams asked how Home Occupancy Permits are controlled.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated they are controlled by observations of neighbors and are complaint
driven. He stated sometimes staff sees what is going on through a "windshield survey" drive by
encounter. He felt it might be a good idea to give all the surrounding neighbors the criteria for Home
Occupation Permit so'they can observe and watch what is going on at this site. He added if a complaint
is received by a neighbor, they would investigate to see if it is being treated as commercial and then there
could be enforcement.
City Council Minutes
September19,2001
Page 8
Councilmember Biane felt the neighbors would be impacted by this being turned into a commercial use
and felt if the Walkers sell this they would make money off of it. He felt the historic designation should not
be granted.
Mayor Alexander stated he is in favor of the designation, but not for a commercial use.
Councilmember Dutton asked if this could be made a historic landmark designation, but the owners told
this has to be kept residential use only.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, the designation is simply an identification of the historic value that it is not
conditioned other than it has to go through a process to be altered beyond what it is being considered as
historic. He stated this is per our Ordinance.
Councilmember Biane felt possibly something should be changed in the Ordinance to keep this from
happening.
Brad Buller, City Planner, felt the code could be looked at, including the section that allows those
alternatives, to see if it has benefited historic preservation and is it a good thing to have and try to
evaluate the current activity of those CUP's. He did not think the code should be modified if it is to simply
out of concern for the future if we are not experiencing it.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the problem is not the historic designation. He added the City has
a zoning code that intends to restrict commercial opportunities in residential areas to historically
designated properties for unique opportunities, i.e., the Christmas House. He continued to state the
owner could come in and ask for a Development Agreement and seek the same use. He stated maybe
the answer is to designate this to protect it against what could happen to it, and direct staff to take away
what is bothering the people in the neighborhood.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to take no action on the item tonight so they can see if
the code can be changed.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they would get the input and review the Ordinance from the Historic
Preservation Commission and advise the neighbors so they can participate in this, and would readvertise
this item when it is ready to come back with options for the Council to review.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to continue the item to October 3, 2001. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
F3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04 -
HOGLE/IRELAND, INC - A request to amend the circulation element of the General Plan to eliminate a
portion of 7th Street from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald Avenue to Hermosa
Avenue. APN: 209-211-17.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05 -
HOGLE/IRELAND, INC - A request to amend the circulation within the Industrial Development District,
Subarea 5 to eliminate a potion of 7th Street from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald
Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. APN: 209-211-17, 30, and 31.
Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer.
Councilmember Dutton asked how many jobs this would create.
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page 9
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated about 250.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Kelly Carlisle of Hogle/Ireland thanked the Public Works Subcommittee and staff for their efforts
and added they are glad to be part of the community.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, TO ELIMINATE A PORTION
OF 7TM STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS CURRENT TERMINUS
EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 01-214. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 670.
ORDINANCE NO. 670 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF
7TM STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 670 for the October 3, 2001 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I1. INTRODUCTION TO THE CITY'S E-GOVERNMENT PLAN (ORAL)
Staff report presented by Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager.
Power point presentation was made by Robert Karatsu.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
12. PRESENTATION OF THE CITY'S ANNUAL REPORT (ORAL)
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page l0
Staff report presented by Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. UPDATE ON CABLE TELEVISION UPGRADE (ORAL)
Staff report presented by Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II. She also introduced Mr. Lease with
Charter Communications who talked about where they are with the upgrade.
Councilmember Williams inquired about the green box complaints.
Mr. Lease stated they will handle these on a case-by-case basis.
ACTON: Report received and filed.
12. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Councilmember Biane asked what was going on with a bid opening for Heritage Park.
Staff reported it is for a tot lot.
Councilmember Williams asked how the benches are placed in parks.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated it is done by the park crew who place them according to the lighting.
Councilmember Williams felt Hermosa Park has a shortage of benches and asked if a couple more could
be put along the walkway paths.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Williams stated she would like to have staff see what options are available to
protect the Etiwanda Station since it is SANBAG owned.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated they would look at the current lease and check into the City obtaining
it as an asset. He asked if it should come back to the whole Council or the Historic Preservation
Subcommittee who would then bring back options to the entire Council.
The Council agreed that the Subcommittee would work on it and then come back to the Council with a
report.
Chief Dennis Michael stated they would go out and check for possible fire hazards. He stated he
would give this update through a memo.
J2. Mayor Alexander stated he would like an oral report at the 10/3/01 meeting on the senior complex
offArchibald and what is going on there. He stated he is very concerned about this complex.
City Council Minutes
September 19, 2001
Page ! !
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they would hold a community meeting and then bring it back to the
Council with a report.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. John Lyons reported for the Council's information that the Etiwanda Station was originally a
lumberyard and that they are now building a school south of the station.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
October 3, 2001
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Ref:lular Meetin¢~
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, October 3, 2001 in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:18 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; ,lan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Kevin McArdle, Community Services
Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II1: Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City
Engineer; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer Brad Buller, City
Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Jim Frost, City Treasurer;
Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Sid
Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District; Kelly Larson, Emergency Prep Specialist; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Deborah
Clark, Library Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City
Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J.
Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Recognition of Alta Loma High School and their efforts to provide facilities for community
programming.
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, introduced the item.
Mayor Alexander presented plaques to Bill Bertrand and Gino DiDonato.
B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Ms. America, Susan Jeske in recognition of "Students Against
Violence Week."
Susan Jeske introduced her program "Students Against Violence Week".
Lewis Homes, Bob Dutton, Filippi Winery and Burrtec, Inc. were introduced as sponsors for the program.
B3. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Southern California Housing Development Corporation for its
efforts to expand the housing options for our community.
Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to LaQuetta Bush-Simmons.
B4. Presentation to Police Captain Rodney Hoops for his service to the community and to wish him
good luck in his future endeavors.
Mayor Alexander presented Captain Hoops with a City tile and thanked him for his service to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and wished him good luck in his new position as he left the City.
City Council Minutes
October 3, 2001
Page 2
Captain Hoops thanked the City for the opportunity to have worked here and stated he would definitely
miss everyone.
Mayor Alexander stated Pete Ortiz would be the new Police Chief.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. Jim Frost commented on the Veteran's Day ceremony scheduled for November 11 at Alta Loma
High School at the Rose Garden. He invited everyone to attend. He continued to read a patriotic
newspaper article written by David Horowitz.
C2. Deirdre Robinson stated she was present at a Council meeting about one month ago regarding
Charter Cable. She stated she did not like Charter's customer service. She stated she is still
concerned about the green cable boxes as far as their safety. She continued to refer to various letters
regarding this matter.
Mayor Alexander stated he would get with her and Charter Cable to get her questions answered.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/12/01 and 9/19/01 and Payroll ending 9/9/01 for the total
amount of $2,377,446.24.
D2. Approval of Easement for electric services at Hermosa Park.
D3. Approval of a request to Summarily Vacate Excess Street Right-of-Way at the southwest corner of
th
Center Avenue and 25 Street, V-180-APN: 209-104-10 and 11.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF CENTER AVENUE AND 25TM STREET
D4. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 01-080) located on the
south side of La Senda Road, west of Sapphire Street, submitted by Tom Coons and Rindy Coons.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM TOM
COONS AND RINDY COONS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
D5. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 for CUP 00-33,
located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Avenue and Hellman Avenue, submitted by
Alta Loma Assisted Living LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. TITLE CORRECTED PER
MEMO WHICH IS ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.
City Council Minutes
October3, 2001
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 01-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 00-33
RESOLUTION NO. 01-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR
CUP 00-33
D6. Approval of Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for CUP 99-17, located at 8248
19th Street, west of Sapphire Street (CCWD Well No. 24).
RESOLUTION NO. 01-220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR CUP 99-17
D7. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for DRC 2001-00273,
located on the south side of La Senda Road, west of Sapphire Street, submitted by Richard A. Watson
and Andrea D. Watson.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RICHARD
A. WATSON AND ANDREA D. WATSON AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
D8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the
amount of $262,609.27 ($238,735.70 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia
Construction, Inc. (CO 01-082), for the Construction of the Amethyst Avenue Pavement Overlay from
Highland Avenue to Wilson Avenue, to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No.
11763035650/1158176-0.
D9. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the
amount of $572,534.60 ($520,486.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Thomsen
Landscape (CO 01-083), for the Construction of the Heritage Park Tot Lot Renovation, to be funded
from Fund 120, Park Development Funds, Account No. 1120305565011203120-0 and appropriate funds
from Fund 120, Park Development Fund balance to Account No. 11203055650/1203120-0.
D10. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the
amount of $180,412.10 ($164,011.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Lambco
Engineering, Inc. (CO 01-084), for the Construction of the Installation of Fiber Optic Cabling at Various
Locations, to be funded from Contract Services Funds, Account No. 10013035300.
City Council Minutes
October 3, 2001
Page 4
Dll. Approval to accept the construction of Terra Vista Parkway Pavement Rehabilitation from Church
Street to Spruce Avenue, Contract No. 01-036 as complete, approval to appropriate $2,550.18 to
Account No. 11823035650/1326182-0 from Traffic Congestion Relief Funds, release the bonds, accept
a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the
final contract amount of $78,856.08.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-222
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TERRA VISTA
PARK~NAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CHURCH STREET
TO SPRUCE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-036, AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D12. Approval to accept the Construction of FY 2000/2001 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation
(Slum/ Seal) and Parking Lot Resurfacing (Seal Coat) Various Locations, Contact No. 01-038 as
complete, approval to appropriate $14,838.35 to Account 11763035650/1022176-0 from Measure I
Fund balance and $14,838.35 to Account 11763035650/1022176-0 from Measure I Fund balance and
$14,838.35 to Account 11343035650~1000134-0 from Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Fund
balance, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice
of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $538,291.17.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FY 200012001 LOCAL
STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (SLURRY SEAL) AND
PARKING LOT RESURFAClNG (SEAL COAT) VARIOUS LOCATIONS,
CONTRACT NO. 01-038, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar as corrected. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 00-04 -
HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. - Request to amend the circulation element of the General Plan to eliminate a
portion of 7'h Street from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald Avenue to Hermosa
Avenue. APN: 209-211-17.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05 -
HOGLE/IRELAND, INC. - Request.to amend the circulation within the Industrial Development District,
Subarea 5 to eliminate a potion of 7th St. from approximately its current terminus east of Archibald Avenue
to Hermosa Avenue. APN: 209-211-17, 30, and 31.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 670.
City Council Minutes
October3, 2001
Page 5
ORDINANCE NO. 670 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 00-04, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF
7TM STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by williams to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 670 for October 17, 2001. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft City of Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan Update. The Project Planning Area encompasses the existing City
(approximately 24,000 acres) as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is
located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to
the policies and programs within all elements of the City's General Plan. The proposed General Plan
includes the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in
non-residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and
residential acreage is increased by 18 acres. Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction
of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the
implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would
occur with build out: approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of
commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses,
and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The Project/Planning Area includes all of the land
area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located
directly to the north. The City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles
west of downtown San Bernardino. The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the
communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and east,
respectively. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is approximately 7,700 acres. Total
project/planning area comprises approximately 31,700 acres. During these public hearings the City
Council will consider the Final EIR and proposes statements of overriding considerations. Certification
of the Final EIR and final action on the General Plan Update will occur after the close of the public
hearings. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 19, 2001)
Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. He introduced Al Bell, Planning Center, to
give additional information.
Mr. Bell gave a power point presentation which is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Councilmember Biane stated he, Councilmember Dutton, members of the Planning Commission and Park
and Recreation Commission came together to come up with this. He commended everyone involved for
their work on this. He stated the plan was changed very little from the original plan.
Councilmember Dutton added the Task Force, Brad Buller and his staff did an excellent job and stated
Rancho Cucamonga is a City with a vision.
Councilmember Williams felt it was very readable and that everyone did an excellent job.
Councilmember Dutton commented he also thought this was a very good plan.
Al Bell, Planning Center, introduced Karen Gulley who also helped with this project.
City Council Minutes
October 3, 2001
Page 6
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was:
Jim Frost, City Treasurer, talked about the first General Plan that was developed and stated he
was glad to hear the first one had things in it that were done right. He stated this is a living
document and appreciates the work that has gone into this.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-226
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2001 GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND
MAKING ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AS
REQUIRED BY LAW
RESOLUTION NO. 01-227
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to continue the item to October 17, 2001 to take further
action. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Gl. FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 FOR TRACTS 14496, 14496-
1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 AND 15902, LOCATED
NORTH OF STATE ROUTE 30 BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND HANLEY AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
RESOLUTION NO. 01-224
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
REPORT, ORDERING THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 AND CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND
ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF
DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to continue the item to November 7, 2001. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
October 3, 2001
Page '7
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. ANNEXATION 01-01 - A request to approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for annexation
proceeding (LAFCO No. 2879) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for approximately 240 acres of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area, generally
located north of 25th Street between Day Creek Channel and East Avenue.
Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner.
RESOLUTION NO. 01-225
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAX REVENUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN AND
AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL
CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAFCO NO. 2879
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 01-225. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
H2. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $83,118.00 AWARDED BY THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM
Staff report presented by Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
H3. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO ORDINANCE 58 DEVELOPMENT
REQUIREMENTS
Staff report presented by Michelle Dawson. A power point presentation was also made.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated he would work with the City Engineer on the information as
reported by staff.
Councilmember Biane commended the Chamber for getting involved in this. He also complimented
staff for their work.
Councilmember Dutton felt the changes were an improvement, but felt when they are considering
exemptions being taken for certain things, that they need to look at some percentage for what the total
cost of the project is no matter what the cost is so that it becomes realistic. He also felt, through the
Redevelopment Agency, that when there are businesses that wants to go ahead and do a full program
of public works that the RDA provide some kind of loan program.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this information will be given to the City Attorney to prepare the
Ordinance.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams, to direct the City Attorney to draft revisions to
Ordinance No. 58. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
City Council Minutes
October 3, 2001
Page 8
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated at the last meeting the Mayor had asked for an update on the
Heritage Park Apartments. He stated they had a very successful meeting today with representatives
from the apartment, the manager and two out of state representatives. He stated Betty Divido was
also present, from Inland Mediation. He stated they have agreed the City will conduct a su~ey of the
residents and that this information will be given to the Council. He added the owners stated they did
not know of the current agreement and that there will be no resident encouraged to move out. He
stated they made the commitment to live by the contract with the City and County.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
J1. Mayor Alexander stated they will publicly reflect the resolution of the cable issue mentioned earlier
in the meeting at the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No comments were made from the public.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 8:51 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ecological Services
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Offic~lT~ 0F F[qNC/~0
2730 Loker Avenue West CU~,~M0/~GA
Carlsbad, California 92008
In Reply Refer To: OC~' 0 1 20~
FWS-SB-2255.] RECEIVED. PLAN/~ 2 6 2001
Dan Coleman
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Department of Planning
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Negative Declaration for the Proposed Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail
Dear Mr. Coleman:
This letter provides our comments on the proposed Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). The proposed project will develop 89 acres along the
Pacific Electric rail line into a trail for pedestrians, bicyclists and equestrians. We provide
these comments in keeping with our agency's mission to work "with others to conserve,
protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of
the American people." We also administer the Endangered Species ACt of 1973, as amended
(Act). Section 7 of the Act requires Federal agencies to consult with us if their actions may
affect federally listed species. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the "take" (e.g., harm,
harassment, pursuit, injury, kill) of federally listed wildlife. "Harm" is defined to include
habitat modification or degradation where it kills or injures wildlife by impairing essential
behavioral patterns including breeding, feeding, or sheltering. Take incidental to otherwise
lawful activities can be authorized under sections 7 (Federal consultations) and 10 (habitat
conservation plans) of the Act.
If a proposed project may affect a listed species and is authorized, funded, or carried out by a
Federal agency, that agency must consult with us pursuant to section 7 of the Act to ensure
that the continued existence of the species would not be jeopardized. During the section 7
process, measures to avoid or minimize effects to listed species and their habitat will be
identified and incorporated into a biological opinion that authorizes incidental take by the
Federal agency and applicant. A consultation can be resolved informally if we concur in
writing that a project is not likely to adversely affect listed species or designated critical
habitat. A Federal agency may designate a non-Federal representative to conduct informal
consultation or prepare a biological assessment by giving written notice to us under 50 CFR
402.08.
Dan Coleman (FWS-SB-2255.1) 2
If a proposed project does not involve a Federal agency, but is likely to result in take of a
listed animal species, the landowner or project proponent should apply for an incidental take
permit, pursuant to section 10 of the Act. When the application is made, measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate effects to listed species and their habitat must be identified and
incorporated into a Habitat Conservation Plan. If the Habitat Conservation Plan and the
permit application meet the issuance criteria, incidental take can be authorized.
We are concerned about the potential adverse effects of the proposed trail to the federally
endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriamiparvus "SBKR"). If this
species is prsent in this area, disturbance to the soil from construction, traffic, and pavement
would adversely affect it. This nocturnal species is also sensitive to night lighting. We
recommend that the project proponent conduct protocol surveys to determine if SBKR
occupies the proposed project area. If the SBKR is detected during these surveys, then the
project proponent should contact our office to obtain incidental take authorization pursuant to
sections 7 or 10 of the Act. Proposed SBKR critical habitat occurs within the proposed
project area. The potential effects of the proposed trail to the SBKR should be considered
significant under CEQA, and the City should propose proper avoidance measures or
mitigation for the loss of these resources.
We were not able to determine from the information provided whether this project would
directly impact any federally listed species. We request that the City revise the negative
declaration and provide a detailed description of the trail development. For example,
information on portions of the trail that may be paved should be included as part of the
project description. In addition, details regarding the "construction" that was mentioned in
the Negative Declaration should be included. We also question the use of irrigation in
developing the trail. We encourage the City to maintain native vegetation in the project area
and plant only native vegetation that requires minimal irrigation. In particular, we encourage
the City to maintain any Riversidean alluvial sage scrub (RASS) or coastal sage scrub that
currently exists in the proposed project area.
RASS has been designated a "very threatened" plant community by the California
Department of Fish and'Game. Due to the rarity and historic losses of this natural
community, any impacts to this significant biological resource should be considered a direct,
significant adverse environmental impact under CEQA, and the City should require sufficient
mitigation (including on site preservation); even if no endangered or threatened species are ·
detected on site. In addition, any loss of RASS should be considered a significant cumulative
impact because other probable future projects, in combination with the effects of past projects
and ongoing activities (e.g., urban development), will contribute to a significant loss of
RASS and the federally listed and sensitive species that depend on this community type for
their long-term survival.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the proposed project. We provide
these comments so that the City may be aware of the sensitive species that may be affected in
the vicinity of the proposed project. We are available to work with the City and project
Dan Coleman (FWS-SB-2255.1) 3
proponent to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to federally listed and sensitive species.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Lucy Caskey of this office at
(760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
% o ¢ Karen A. Evans
Assistant Field Supervisor
cc: CDFG Chino Hills, CA (Attn: Jeff Drongesen)
-~;- ~; z:uor'~; UUUIBO~I => R CUCAUONGA COB DEV; ~2 ~
b~;LILBURH CORPORRTION 0C~-17-81 B3;~ZPm ~rOm 89B1689~9E94772847 Peg
~eived ~t-17-e1 ~2:,d~pm from ~9 688 1141 * LILBU~ CORPORATION pa
October 9, 2001
Honorable City Commission Members and other elected officials
As a property owner at 6523 Veneto Place, Rancho Cueamonga CA., a part of the Fieldstone
Subdivision we make the following plea:
We are in great need of a sound wall along the newly constructed 30 freeway. Our property is.at the
end of the cul-de-sac and is immediately adjacent to the freeway. As of now we are constantly aware
of the heavy vehicular traffic along Highland. When we first considered buying the property we were
concerned about the future noise which might be generated by the proposed freeway. We were
informed by the developer and given site plans of the project which revealed, any road constructed be
below grade. Of course this is not the fact.
We respectfully request the Commission to consider the noise and visual impact this project has on the
property owners. Our standard of living will be greatly diminished along with future property values.
We ask that you require a sound wall (not a retaining wall) be placed alone the southerly portion of the
30 freeway from Rochester east to the most western portion of residential development.
Sound studies may reveal a insignificant amount of CNEL levels, thereby meeting the objectives of the
DBA requirements, however as a resident living under the daily conditions and impacts, we find the
results of the study to be unacceptable.
The following mitigation measures are recommended;
I. Erect a sound wall
2. Plant trees with thick and wide crowns which produce foliage year round.
3. Plant Oleander trees a minimum of 6-8 feet apart in a effort to diminish noise and glare from
headlights and pollution.
Th~/~a~i~n to this most immediate problem.
Lot
ItORIZON COLLECTION
I)ISCI~OSllRE STATEMENT
This document contains information which is extremely inrportant tbr bmneowners and needs to be read
caref(dly Buyer understands that all or portions of this document nray be recorded against tire title of tile
properly. There are font sections that comprise this document: Coummnity Disclosure hems, Construction
Disclosure Items, Sales and Merclmndising Disclosure Items, and Lot Specific Disclosure Items.
Please sign and initial where provided, to indicate your acknowledgment that you have been given this
disclosm'e and that you are aware of tire important information it contains about your legal rights and
obligations.
A. COMMUNITY DISCLOSURE ITEMS
A-1. FIRE STATION
Horizon Collection will be served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department, Station #5
located at 11108 Banyan in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. The telephone number is (909) 477-
2770.
A-2. WIND
This project is located in an area where there are high winds. Precautionary measures
shonld be taken when doing any lot improvements.
A-3. PARK DISCLOs;IIRE
Parks are available to the Horizon Collection residents within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. For further information regarding use of parks or future parks, contact the
Parks & Recreation Department of Rancho Cucamonga at (909) 477-2760.
A-4. FREEWAY
Interstate 15 is approximately 4 miles East of the project. Commencing in 1998,
construction will begin on Freeway #30. This fi'eeway will consist of two travel laues in a
east-west direction, located immediately north of Highland Avent, e Construction is
anticipated to take 24 months. For additional information, please contact SANBAG at
(.909) 981-9859.
A-5. SURROUNDING CONDITIONS & VIEWS
Tava Deveh)pment, lnc. does not guarantee any existing views now or in the future.
Moreover, Tava Development, Inc. cannot gt, arautee the existeuce or preservation of any
pre-existing vegetation, trees, plant growth or landscaping located on or in the vicinity of
any particular lot. All care and maintenance (including irrigation) of vegetation, trees, plant
growth or other landscaping items on the lot is solely tile responsibility of tire homeowner
unless otl~erwise maintained by a homeowner's association. Also, Tava Devel'opment, lnc
with tbe installation of side yard tubular steel fencing does this only to create a sense of
openness and does not warrant any views obtained by the installation of this fencing Taw~
Development, Inc. cannot control future development adjacent to or surrounding the
project, it is the purchaser's responsibility to independently evaluate the home site and lot
within the subdivision for potential impacts to views and surrounding conditions.
A-6. CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
Purchasers acknowledge that Tara Development, Inc. cannot guarantee that the project will
be completed as initially proposed and Tava Development, Inc. reserves the right to increase
and decrease home sizes or alter the materials, plans, specifications or home designs in the
project in its sole discretion. Once Tara Development, lnc. has entered into a sales contract
based upon a particular model, Tara Development, Inc. will build the house as designed and
such design shall be substantially consistent with the applicable model home. However,
1
STANLEY R. DUTRO, JR.
LESLIE DUTRO
6564 Catania Place
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91701
October 17, 2001
City Council
Rancho Cucamonga
RE: S.O.S. (Secure Our Sound wall)
Dear Council Members,
I am sorry that we cannot attend tonight's meeting on this very important issue, but we wanted to
make our position know to all involved in this project. It is having a tremendous impact on our
entire neighborhood and is showing my husband and I why we moved to such a nice place.
Attached is a letter drafted by my husband that was sent not only to Supervisor Jon Mikels as
addressed on this copy, but also to Senator Brulte and Assemblyman Leonard. Please take this
into consideration when making decisions regarding the sound wall project and the impact it
will have on the "nice place" we moved to.
T.han~ you,
Concerned Citizen
STANLEY R. DUTRO, JR.
LESLIE DUTRO
6564 Catania Place
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91701
October 7, 2001
Jon Mikels, Supervisor
8303 Haven Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730
RE: Secure Our Sound Wall (S.O.S.)
Dear Sir,
My wife and I live in the area of homes just to the south of the 30/210 Freeway construction
project between Woodruff and Rochester. We are very concerned about the fact that there are no
plans to build a sound wall.
Let me start by saying that the safety of our children and other pedestrians is our foremost
concern. The lack of a wall them will endanger the kids walking to school and people out for the
morning and evening exercise. There is a rather large embankment, and we can envision a car
careening out of control through the side fence, through the chain-link fence and into someone
walking on the side of the road as a worst-case scenario. As a best-case scenario, we can see the
same happening with the victim being one of the homes with its back to the freeway.
We also don't like the idea of being able to see the cars, trucks and other vehicles on the
freeway, and we certainly don't want them to see us. As a case in point, just today there have
been cameras, helicopters, trailers and water trucks on the closed portion of the freeway between
the Rochester and Milliken overpasses filming something. We can see them and hear them, and
that was just a small amount of disruption compared to an open freeway with cars flying by.
Next, there is going to be a tremendous amount of dirt, soot and pollution over our houses and
streets. It will be difficult to keep our homes, cars and other property clean and in good working
order. People with breathing and other health problems will be forced to spend time indoors or
move, which brings me to my next problem.
Property values in this area will plummet; we will all lose money. The area we moved from was
crime- and drug-infested. We moved here for a better quality of life. The lack of the sound wall
will reduce property values so that we may end up in the same situation again. As a person who
just invested a lot of money in my new home, I am not willing to lose money without a good
explanation. So far, I have not been provided with one.
We do not believe that passing the buck will get the problem solved, and we also believe that the
many agencies involved could come to a resolution, as they have before, to get this wall built.
We know there were no homes here when the freeway project was planned out. There were no
homes in a lot of places, but we're the only section going without a wall.
· Page 2
October 7, 2001
Also, when were the sound tests putting us below the decibel level conducted? Was it before
there were homes here? Was it after a portion of Highland Avenue was closed, forcing traffic
either north to Banyan or south to Base Line? Those would not be accurate testing conditions.
Perhaps it was while Highland was still open, but how great a measure could that have been
compared to a busy freeway connecting the Inland Empire with the San Gabriel Valley?
Please take into consideration our concerns and comments. A one-time investment in this
community would ensure a safe and secure environment for the families who live here. We
moved to this area to give our families the kind of life they deserve. They do not deserve this
disruption.
Cordially,
Stanley R. Dutro, Jr.
Concerned Homeowner
October 17, 2001
Dear Mayor, and City Council Members,
Just over two years ago I and my neighbor moved to the citation development. Each of us
had our reasons for choosing this area, many of us choosing the Alta Loma area of Rancho
Cucamonga because of the superior schools for our children, the well groomed parks and
neighborhoods, and the diversity and harmony of the city population.
We were all aware that a freeway was to be built in close proximity to our homes. I, speaking
for myself, did not object to this because of the way it was presented to me. The Citation Homes
sales representative affirmed the freeway would be two (2) lanes in each direction, and would
definitely be below grade. As we are all painfully aware, this is not the situation.
As was shown in the last meeting on October 9~ 2001, we are as a group of neighborhoods
united in our stand on this situation. We will continue to stand together until this problem is solved
to our satisfaction. We gave the masons as to why the sound wall should be built. They were stated
at the last meeting, so I will not reiterate them. What it comes down to is this; It is the responsibility
of this city government to look out for the welfare of the people of this city. We trust you to make
the decisions that benefit all concerned. Someone made the decision to allow these homes to be built
and that there would be no need for a wall on the south side of the freeway. Obviously there needs
to be a more extensive study of this problem, otherwise all of us would not be parked as a group on
your doorstep. Your consideration in this is required.
John E. Gus~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION '
TRACT WALL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
Project No.: TT 15797 (Citation)
Plan Check No.: 98-322
Rec'd from B & S: 3/31/98
Returned to Eng.: 4/7/98
APPROVED
X DO NOT ISSUE - CORRECTIONS NEEDED
COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAl,
No - Noise mitigation not resolved.
CORiLECTIONS
Need to resolve freeway sound wall requirements. This impacts Highland walls
and to some degree, walls wrapping around on the north/south sides of the tract.
Please contact Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner, at (909)477-2750 regarding these comments from the
Planning Division.
To: FILE
I:rom: Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
$-bject: ~-F 15797 - Citation Homes
Date: July 8, 1998
Freeway sound wall:
I spoke with JeffWeber of Citation Homes and said we need to resolve the conflicting
information from his noise consultant versus the Caltrans noise consultant about how high the
freeway sound wall needs to be in this location. His consultant contends a 15-30 foot high
wall at his tract boundary is needed to mitigate noise. Yet, there is only a 6 foot high wall at
the existing tract east of Citation which CalTrans seems to think is adequate. I said it is not
acceptable for Citation to build a 15 + foot high wall next to the 6 foot high wall, followed by
the Fieldstone Tract with another 15+ foot high wall because the combination may funnel the
freeway noise to the existing tract sandwiched in the middle. He agreed this would cause
problems and suggested we get a copy of the Caltrans noise studyto compare criteria used. I
advised him that the City Traffic Engineer Jon Gillespie was trying to obtain a copy but Gillespie
is out of the office until July 20th. He said he will call Gillespie upon his return or go stir
trouble at Caltrans to get his own copy.
A~ain, Citation is aware that the final phase of construction along Highland Avenue will be held
up until the sound wall is resolved. Weber said he is not in a time crunch to build this phase
yet, but is trying to avoid a delay in the future.
File: h:h'eport\compltns\Itm\ 15354
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PROJECT COMPLETENESS REPORT Project No.: TTM 15354
Type: 61 sinele family lots
Location: NEC of Ken;~on Way and
Woodruff Way
To Planning Division: Steve Hayes APN: 227-011-26
P/EMeeting: 12/10/96 By: ~c~,,_q...___
/
Yes [-~ No, Accepted as COMPLETE - If No, see below (if Yes, see "B" only)
A. Completeness - Additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the
application complete:
I. Since the current application is for a different product type and layout that the
previously approved tentative tract, a new tentative tract number shall be obtained.
2. Provide the following on the Concep .t.t.t.t~ Grading Plan:
a. Typical lot grading.
b. Show where applicable the slopes between the adjacent pads.
3. Label the landscape areas which are proposed to be publicly maintained, i.e., the lots
which back-on to Kenyon Way, Woodruff Way and Highland Avenue.
4. Label the streets, existing or proposed drive approaches, and street connections on the
Site Utilization Map.
B. Issues:
1. The proposed grading plan shows 2 to I slopes along the northerly side of Kenyon
Way, 3 to 1 is the maximum allowed.
2. The plan view for the proposed tentative map and grading plan shows a 46 foot
dimension for the interior streets whereas the section for said interior streets shows a
dimension of S0 feet. The 50 foot dimension is the correct one.
3. The proposed street connection on the Woodruff Way frontage to be moved to the
south with 'side on' homes only. This is for a number of reasons as follows:
1 of 2
a. To discourage cut through traffic
b. Screen the homes from the commercial property on the west side of Woodruff
Way.
c. To screen the homes from the projected increase in traffic after the Route 30
freeway is built and Woodruff becomes a frontage road.
4. The interior streets which are label as lot 'A', 'B' and 'C' shall be change to read street
'A', 'B' and 'C', and the street names applied for through the Planning Division. The
City accepts streets only as easements, not in fee.
5. The conceptual grading plan shows grading on the future church site. Permission to do
so will be required from the church site property owners prior to approval of the Final
Map.
6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and
Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval.
7. Kenyon Way, Woodruff Way and Highland Avenue - Complete the frontage public
improvements, including, but not necessarily limited to, street trees and landscaping,
pursuant to City standards, policies, ordinances, etc., to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. Improvement plans for the public improvements, prepared by a registered
Civil Engineer, shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the
issuance of a City building permit.
8. Full street improvements are required on all internal streets associated with the
tentative tract. Improvement plans for the public improvements, prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, prior
to the issuance of a City building permit.
9. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements and
internal streets associated with the tentative tract, prior to approval of the Final Map.
10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of
operating all new street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to
approval of the Final Map.
2 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 26, 1997
Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman
Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, William Bethel, Rich Macias, Larry McNiei, Peter
Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner;, Ralph Hanson,
Deputy City Attorney; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior
Civil Engineer; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Brad Bullet, City Planner, obse~ed that he would be distributing information on Heritage and Red
Hill Parks to the Commission regarding P~85.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Macias, carried 4-0-0-1 (McNiel abstain), to approve the
minutes of January 22, 1997.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-02 -
CITATION HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Development District
designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 18 acres of land at the northeast comer of
Miiliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane -APN: 227-011-17. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tentative Tract 15796.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15796 - CITATION HOMES - A
proposed residential subdivision of 94 lots on 18 acres of land in the Medium Residential District
(8-14 dwelling units per acre), proposed to be Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre), located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane -
APN: 227-011-17. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration. Related file: Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-02.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03 -
CITATION HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Development Distdct
designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 12.4 acres of land south of Highland Avenue,
east of Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tentative Tract 15797.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15797 - CITATION HOMES - A
proposed residential subdivision of 61 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land in the Medium
Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), proposed to be Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre), located south of Highland Avenue and east of Woodruff Place -
APN: 227-011-26. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration. Related file: Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-03.
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there will be two separate fences, a soundwail for the freeway and
another wall along the property boundary.
Mr. Hayes confirmed there will be sound attenuation walls along Kenyon Way.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that the current design plans for the freeway do not include
a soundwall in that location.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt there may be duplication.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that if the project is built prior to awarding of the construction
contract for the freeway, Caltrans may include a wall. He said the City is making the developer
responsible for the wall along the property line.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing.
Jerry Linton, Citation Homes, 19600 Fairchild Road, #270, Irvine, expressed appreciation for staffs
efforts in helping the project to move forward. He stated the project will not be able to mitigate the
sound of the freeway. He observed that soundwalls are designed at a 20-foot height to mitigate the
traffic noise from Highland Avenue, not the future freeway.
Mr. Hayes commented that the City's General Plan recognizes the noise levels cannot be completely
mitigated. He pointed out that when the preliminary noise study was completed, the noise consultant
had been under the impression that the freeway will be above ground. He observed there will be a
final noise study at plan check status and there is a chance that the walls will not be as high as
originally anticipated because the freeway will be lower.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the City should require a disclosure that the freeway will be built.
Mr. Bullet stated that a disclosure can be required, but it is hard for staff to police the issue.
Mr. Linton stated they had just finished another development in the City at which they had disclosed
the future existence of the freeway for their own protection. He said they would include notice of the
future freeway at this location.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- February 26, 1997
Commissioner McNiel stated the application is a straightforward zone change to reduce the density
for marketing purposes. He felt the proposed development fits well in the n.eighborhood and
supported the application.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolutions recommending approval
of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-02, approving Tentative Tract 15796, recommending
approval of Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-03, and approving Tentative Tract 15797 and
issue negative declarations for Tentative Tract 15796 and 15797. Motion carded by the following
vote:
AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-25 - RODRIGUEZ -
A request to construct a 2,900 square foot drive-thru facility and a 5,548 square foot restaurant
on 3.7 acres of land in the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -
APN: 207-211-12 and 13. Related file: Pre-Application Review 95-04.
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and distributed copies of a revised roof
plan and equipment specifications for roof-mounted equipment which had been provided by the
applicant earlier in the week. He indicated staff had determined the proposed parapet height and
well depth should be sufficient to screen the roof equipment from view. He reported the applicant
had also submitted revised grading plans the previous week and staff had determined that, with the
conditions as written, the drainage should be handled satisfactorily.
Chairman McNiel asked for further clarification of the drainage issues.
Mr. Hayes replied that the issues had to do with the nature of the queuing of flows and the directing
of overflows into the spillway. He noted that temporary measures will be taken with Phase One and
the issues would be permanently addressed with Phase Two. He commented that Engineering staff
felt the issues could be resolved pending approval of the Flood Control District.
Commissioner McNiel remarked that temporary measures are included with Phase One with
permanent solutions waiting until Phase Two. He asked the soundness of the temporary system,
noting that Phase Two may not occur for possibly 6 to 12 years.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that with Phase One, there will be water flowing over raw
land. He noted that staff felt the overflow concems were addressed by the latest grading plans
which had been recently submitted.
Commissioner McNiel asked if staff felt it is a safe system.
Mr. James responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if everything had been worked out or if it was still to be worked out.
Mr. James replied that confirmation of acceptance had not yet been received from the Flood Control
District.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if concrete drainage swales will be used.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 26, 1997
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
TRACT WALL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS
Project No.: TT 15797 (Citation)
Plan CheckNo.: 98-322
Kec'd from B & S: 3/31/98
Returned to Eng.: 4/7/98
APPROVED
X DO NOT ISSUE - CORRECTIONS NEEDED
COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
No - Noise mitigation not resolved.
CORRECTIONS
Need to resolve freeway sound wall requirements. This impacts Highland walls
and to some degree, walls wrapping around on the north/south sides of the tract.
Please contact Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner, at (909)477-2750 regarding these comments from the
Planning Division.
To: FII_E
From: Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
Subject: TT 15797 - Citation Homes
0ate: July 8, 1998
Freeway sound wall:
I spoke with JeffWeber of Citation Homes and said we need to resolve the conflicting
information from his noise consultant versus the Caltrans noise consultant about how high the
freeway sound wall needs to be in this location. His consultant contends a 15-30 foot high
wail at his tract boundary is needed to mitigate noise. Yet, there is only a 6 foot high.wail at
the existing tract east of Citation which CaiTrans seems to think is adequate. I said it is not
acceptable for Citation to build a 15 + foot high wall next to the 6 foot high wall, followed by
the Fieldstone Tract with another 15+ foot high wall because the combination may funnel the
freeway noise to the existing tract sandwiched in the middle. He agreed this would cause
problems and suggested we get a copy of the Caltrans noise study to compare criteria used. I
advised him that the City Traffic Engineer Jon Gillespie was trying to obtain a copy but Gillespie
is out of the office until July 20th. He said he will call Gillespie upon his return or go stir
trouble at Caitrans to get his own copy.
Again, Citation is aware that the final phase of construction along Highland Avenue will be held
up until the sound wall is resolved. Weber said he is not in a time crunch to build this phase
yet, but is trying to avoid a delay in the future.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PROJECT COMPLETENESS REPORT Project No.: TTM 15354
Type: 61 single family lots
Location: NEC of Kan~on Way and
To Planning Division: Steve Hayes WoodmffWa¥
AlaN: 227-011-26
Yes ['~ No, Accepted as COMPLETE-If No, see below (if Yes, see "B" only)
A. Completeness - Additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the
application complete:
1. Since the current application is for a different product type and layout that the
previously approved tentative tract, a new tentative tract number shall be obtained.
2. Provide the following on the Concep .t.t.t.t~ Grading Plan:
a. Typical lot grading.
b. Show where applicable the slopes between the adjacent pads.
3. Label the landscape areas which are proposed to be publicly maintained, i.e., the lots
which back-on to Kenyon Way, Woodruff Way and Highland Avenue.
4. Label the streets, existing or proposed drive approaches, and street connections on the
Site Utilization Map.
B. Issues:
1. The proposed grading plan shows 2 to 1 slopes along the northerly side of Kenyon
Way, 3 to 1 is the maximum allowed.
2. The plan view for the proposed tentative map and grading plan shows a 46 foot
dimension for the interior streets whereas the section for said interior streets shows a
dimension of 50 feet. The 50 foot dimension is the correct one.
3. The proposed street connection on the Woodruff Way frontage to be moved to the
south with 'side on' homes only. This is for a number of reasons as follows:
1 of 2
a. To discourage cut through trat'fic
b. Screen the homes from the commercial property.on the west side of Woodruff
Way.
c. To screen the homes from the projected increase in traffic after the Route 30
freeway is built and Woodruff becomes a frontage road.
4. The interior streets which are label as lot 'A', 'B' and 'C' shall be change to read street
'A', 'B' and 'C', and the street names applied for through the Planning Division. The
City accepts streets only as easements, not in fee.
5. The conceptual grading plan shows grading on the future church site. Permission to do
so will be required from the church site property owners prior to approval of the Final
Map.
6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and
Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval.
7. Kenyon Way, Woodruff Way and Highland Avenue - Complete the frontage public
improvements, including, but not necessarily limited to, street trees and landscaping,
pursuant to City standards, policies, ordinances, etc., to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. Improvement plans for the public improvements, prepared by a registered
Civil Engineer, shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, prior to the
issuance of a City building permit.
8. Full street improvements are required on all internal streets associated with the
tentative tract. Improvement plans for the public improvements, prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, prior
to the issuance of a City building permit.
9. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements and
internal streets associated with the tentative tract, prior to approval of the Final Map.
I 0. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of
operating all new street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to
approval of the Final Map.
2 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
February 26, 1997
Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho
Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman
Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance.
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, William Bethel, Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Peter
Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Princ!pal Planner;, Ralph Hanson,
Deputy City Attorney; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior
Civil Engineer; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Brad Buller, City Planner, obse~ed that he would be distributing information on Hedtage and Red
Hill Parks to the Commission regarding P~85.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Macias, carded 4-0-0-1 McNiel abstain), to approve the
minutes of January 22, 1997.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-02
CITATION HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Development District .
designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 18 acres of land at the northeast comer of
Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane -APN: 227-011-17. Staff has prepared a Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tentative Tract 15796.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15796 - CITATION HOME,~ - A
proposed residential subdivision of 94 lots on 18 acres of land in the Medium Residential District
(8-14 dwelling units per acre), proposed to be Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per
acre), located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane -
APN: 227-011-17. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration. Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-02.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03 -
CITATION HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Development Distriut
designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 12.4 acres of land south of Highland Avenue,
east of Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of
environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tentative Tract 15797.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15797 - CITATION HOMES - A
proposed residential subdivision of 61 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land in the Medium
Residential Distdct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), proposed to be Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre), located south of Highland Avenue and east of Woodruff Place -
APN: 227-011-26. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration. Related file: Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-03.
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there will be two separate fences, a
soundwall
for
the
freeway
arid
another wall along the property boundary.
Mr. Hayes confirmed there will be sound attenuation walls along Kenyon Way.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that the current design plans for the freeway do not include
a soundwall in that location.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt there may be duplication.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that if the project is built prior to awarding of the construction
contract for the freeway, Caltrans may include a wall. He said the City is making the developer
responsible for the wall along the property line.
Chairman Barker opened the public heating.
Jerry Linton, Citation Homes, 19600 Fairchild Road, #270, Irvine, expressed appreciation for staff's
efforts in helping the project to move forward. He stated the project will not be able to mitigate the
sound of the freeway. He observed that soundwalls are designed at a 20-foot height to mitigate the
traffic noise from Highland Avenue, not the future freeway.
Mr. Hayes commented that the City's General Plan recognizes the noise levels cannot be completely
mitigated. He pointed out that when the preliminary noise study was completed, the noise consultant
had been under the impression that the freeway will be above ground. He observed there will be a
final noise study at plan check status and there is a chance that the walls will not be as high as
originally anticipated because the freeway will be lower.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the City should require a disclosure that the freeway will be built.
Mr. Bullet stated that a disclosure can be required, but it is hard for staff to police the issue.
Mr. l. Jnton stated they had just finished another development in the City at which they had disclosed
the future existence of the freeway for their own protection. He said they would include notice of the
future freeway at this location.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes ~ ~. February 26, 1
Commissioner McNiel stated the application is a straightforward zone change to reduce the density
for marketing purposes. He felt the proposed development fits well in the neighborhood and
supported the application.
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolutions recommending approval
of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-02, approving Tentative Tract 15796, recommending
approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-03, and approving Tentative Tract 15797 and
issue negative declarations for Tentative Tract 15796 and 15797. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-25 - RODRIGUEZ -
A request to construct a 2,900 square foot drive-thru facility and a 5,548 square foot restaurant
on 3.7 acres of land in the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -
APN: 207-211-12 and 13. Related file: Pre-Application Review 95-04.
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and distributed copies of a revised roof
plan and equipment specifications for roof-mounted equipment which had been provided by the
applicant earlier in the week. He indicated staff had determined the proposed parapet height and
well depth should be sufficient to screen the roof equipment from view. He repoded the applicant
had also submitted revised grading plans the previous week and staff had determined that, with the
conditions as written, the drainage should be handled satisfactorily.
Chairman McNiel asked for further clarification of the drainage issues.
Mr. Hayes replied that the issues had to do with the nature of the queuing of flows and the directing
of overflows into the spillway. He noted that temporary measures will be taken with Phase One and
the issues would be permanently addressed with Phase Two. He commented that Engineering staff
felt the issues could be resolved pending approval of the Flood Control District.
Commissioner McNiel remarked that temporary measures are included with Phase One with
permanent solutions waiting until Phase Two. He asked the soundness of the temporary system,
noting that Phase Two may not occur for possibly 6 to 12 years.
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that with Phase One, there will be water flowing over raw
land. He noted that staff felt the overflow concerns were addressed by the latest grading plans
which had been recently submitted.
Commissioner McNiel asked if staff felt it is a safe system.
Mr. James responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if everything had been worked out or if it was still to be worked out.
Mr. James replied that confirmation of acceptance had not yet been received from the Flood Control
District.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if concrete drainage swales will be used.
Planning Commission Minutes -$- February 26, 1997
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print ~MIk::--t,
Signature /t4~$~'
2. Print I__btPK}q
Signature/.~,~0~ ~1,0 I~
Signature
4. Print ~t9
Signature
5. Print ~
Signature
Signature~,~,
Signature
Signatur~~~~
9. Print ~~
Signatu~~~
S gna ur
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print~ I Q/~ ~/~,f-/-~
Signamr~~
2. Print
Si~ature
Si~amre
Si~a~re
5. Print ~~
Si~ature~
7. Print ~E~
Si~amre
8: Print ~
S~amre~Gw~
9. Print ~/~
10. Print 'T~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print ./ff;/£~.5 off~//gt.~.G ~-3~_~--/
2. Print ~[~X~
Si~ature
3 Print ~
Signatureq~}~ ~ ~~ -
4. Print ~3(~,~
Signature 'fiCA
Signature
.
Signature~ff~~
Si~atur~
lO. Print ~.&
Signature ~6.~ ~x ~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
I. Print ~t c~f~ ,e .'-f~,~ / I~O~,r' ~aT~' ~.
Si~amre
2. Print ~o~
Si~ature [~
Si~amr3' Print~~
Si~amre (~M, ~
5. Print ~ I~Lt
Si~at~e ~
6. Print
7. Prink ~
Si~amre~
9. Print C~//~D
Signature ~~~ ~~ '
10. Print ~~
Signature F2 ~ ~%~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print ~/~,,
S~gnature ~/~;
2. Print ~
Signature
3.
Print
Signature
4. Print ~
Signature'?
5. Print ~
Signature ~'
6. Print O~g/~
Signature
7. Prin~~
Signature K_~
Signatu~
9: Print ~/~ ~w~~ /
.Signature~~~ ~ '~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signature
3. Print
Signature
Signature
7. Print ~m~a
S~gnatur~~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print
Si~amr~
2. Print
Si~ature ~
3. Print
Si~at~e ~ ~, ~~ - '
4. Print ~ ~ '~//~q~ //~Z 2 ~f/,' ~, ~.
Si~amr~
5. Pdnt ~f~. ~ ~ 6~7 ~~ W/.
Signature
/ ,
Signature ~{~Af
Signamr~
'/
10. Print /
Si~ature ~~ [ ~'
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
I. Print ~¢~'(~e,
Si
Si
Si
Signature
5. Print~
Signature
6. Print~ i
Si~ature.~
Si~atur¢' ~
Si~ature r[~~
9. Print ~h ~f~or~ *~lff ~ea ~L~e~
Signature
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print ~q~Z-/ ~ Zf£/~o t z ~5~7~ /'/'~/~ ~Z
Si~atur~ ~~ ~ ~
Signature~ ~j~.
3. Print /~dF~ U ~. ~.~e~ ~ 5~ ~~,~ ~
4. Print ~ ~ ~ 6 ~0 ~~r~ ~ff
Si~amre ~~ ~
Si amr
Si~ature
Si~at~e~ ~~
8. Print~~ ~ff~ //Tff~ f~,~ ~.
Si~amre ~~ ~
9. Print ~zd ~,Uc,~J ~ 6~g7 ~o ~.
Si~ature ~ ~~ ,
10. Print ~/~ ~e ~C~ V ~ ~
Signatu~//~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
I. Print ~'~.
Signature ~ [4-0, ko mo, C~ q~OI
2. Print
Signature
3. Print
4. Print
si
5. Print'
Si
6. Print
Signature
7. Print
Si~ature
8. Print
Signature~
9. Print
Signature
lO. Print
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print }~I(,~/[~L_
Signature ~4~
2. Print ~~/
Signature
6. Print ~x,~
Signatur~
7. Print ~,~
Si~ature~
Signature" ~~a
9. Print ~
Signature ~c~ ~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and WoodruffStreet
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print .-~fl /
Sig. ature
2. Print ~,~
Signa~e
3. Print
4. Print ~
6: Print
7. Print
Si~amre ~t~'~~ ~ ~~ glO/U
8. Print ~ ~~ ~~6~ ~q V,~L~
Si~amre ~l ~,~('~o ~[~ ~ ~ ql~O}
'
Signature
10. Print
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signatur~ ~gad./f--~f~ '
Si~at~e~
3. Print &~qZ ~/~
Si~amre
4. Print
Silage
5. Print
Silage
Signature
7. Print
Si~ature
Signature ~~~~
9. Print . ~ ~'
Si~ature
10. Print ~LUL~
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print ~f?,~t~4 ~//-~d4/~ ~, ~ ~ ~~
2. Print ~~ ~/d~
Signature~ ~~. ~~_
3: Print ~]]_ ~~ ~ ' Jingo ~¢/0 ~.
Sl na r
4. Print ~~ ~~~ Ilg~o ~1o c~,
Signature ~
Si~ature ~& a~}
6. Print
Signature ~~ ~~, ~ ~ ¢~
7. Print .~ ~~
Si~ature .
8. Print ~}~, ~. ~o~ ~ ~ P/'
Signature .~ ~ ~ t
9. Print ~C~ ~ ~d ~ ¢0~~
lO. Print ~e(5~ 1~6~. (~Z~ ~c ~,
Signature ~ ~ ~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
2. P nt
Signa~e
Si~ature ~[~
Si~amre
5. Print '~L~_ ~.~/
Si~amre ~~~ ~ ,
Si~ature ~X~L (~
7. Print ~k]l
Si~amre
8. Print
Signa~re
Signat~e
Signatur~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signam~ ~ ~'~~ )
Signature ~ 0
Si~amre ~ ~ ~ J~ "
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and WoodruffStreet
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signature
2. Print
Signature ~/ ~d~/ -
3. Print ~~0
Signature
4. PrintS'
s ur[g;k
5. Print ~-
Signature ~ ~ (~-
6. Print ~c~~~h
Signature
7. Print~
Si~ature
8. Print ~~,~
Signamr~
9. Print ~
Signature ~
lO. Print
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signature79?.e~t?
2. Print, ~J~[~ J_~
3. Print ~ff~~
4. Print ~E~
Si~amr~~. ~ ~. --
Si~amre (~~ ~ ' --
6. Print
Si~at~/(~p, ~ll~~
9. Print
Si~atur~~,
10. Print~~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print
Signature
- ~
2. Print ~r' ~ ~ 0,~' ~ ~/0
3. Print ~ ~6t ~ t .~4~ [za ~ //~q ~/,Cc~ ~.
9. Print ~.~/~/
Si~atur~~ R c. y/~/
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwail to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print
Signature ~~
Si~amre ~~ .... '
Silage /~ .... ' '
5.~nt ~.~
Si~atu~~
si~=~'.~ ~ h ~/ ' '
lO. Print
Signa~~ .
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
~ NAME ~ ADDRESS
Signature' ~
P/~
6. Print ~,~
Si~amre (~
7. PnnC ,~'~
Si~at~e(~
8. Print .~,~a ~ff
Signa~~~'
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signature
Signature
4. Print
5. ~nt. ~ cXo ~t 7a/ ~ 717~/
Si
6. Print ~Or~ ~a~ qUO/
Si ' -
Si~amre ~
lO. Print M,~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
2. ~nt ~~Q ~/~1 . /{~ ~2lo CT
Si~amre ~~
Signa~e ~i ~~
~77/~ ~
Si~a~-- ~ ~,
10. Print ~/~r /~r,~ ~U ~c~ /o ~.
Signa~e
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signature ,~.~' ~ Ac~/~-~ / -'
Si~atur~ W ~ . , v
Si~a~r~ ~~ ~
6~ Print ~~ ~60~ 2l~ ~~
7. Print ~ ~~ ~3 g~
Si~ature ~F~
S~a~e ~ ~
· ~
9. Pnnt ~~f~]~ ~ff ~K~
Sign~ ~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1~ Print ~q~ ~OJ~l ~'~C'°(-T-) ~J~/~')'K~ ~[.
S~at~e ~
Signature
si~ f_~,~ ~/~.~ -
6: Print ~
.
7. Print ~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Si~atur~~
.
3. ~nt
Si~amre ~ ~~~ , /
5. Print ~/b ~4~~~- ~'~ 9o ~ ~ ~Z.
6. Print ~ r
Si~ature
Silage
Silage '{/
10. Print ~~"
Signa~e
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cueamonga.
NAME
Signature ~ 6I o~
3. Print
Signature
4. e.nt
Signa~e~F~--~/Z~
6. Print d 0 o_~ (~
S~a~e
lO. Print ~~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
SignatUreD~,~
Si~t~e '1
3. Print ~-~d~V'~ ']~)[~4'Z_. (_o'S ~(~ ~] [~f']/~')_~3 '~ )-
Signature
4. Print
Signature
s. Print ~o~,',-a t401,~-~,,~c ~,~-~q ~,,~ ?/.
6. Print .~a[t,~
Si~amre
Silage
10. Print
Signa~e '~ ~~ .....
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
ADDRESS
NAME
S~amre ~ U/~/~ '~ '
Si~amre
Si~amre ~~
Silage
Signa~e ~
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print /OHIL-t-/~ ~"0~%/,~
Signature -~
2. Print ~ ~D~, //~ ]~~
Signature
3. Print ~gl~
Signature ~
O
4. Print /1~
Signature
5. Print //P~
Signature ~~
6. Print ~l'[¢rq~a~a-~nq ~570 Ca~aat'~ P/ace,
7. Print
Signature _~ ~ ~ ]~._/
8. Print
Signature
9. Prin~~~~
Sign~~
10. Print~
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print g,q~
Signature
2. Print
--
3. Print ~.la
Si~ature
6. Print
Signa~re
7. Prim
Si~ature
8. Print
Signat~e
9. Print
Signature
10. Print
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print j~]~
2. Print
Si~amre
3. Print
4. Print
6. Print
Si~ature
7. Print
Signature
8. Print
Signature
9. Prim
Signature
10. Print
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signature
2. Pdnt~~
Si~amr~I'
Print/~
3.
Signature
4. Print ~-t~'~5~ ~g~7 ~0~,]],. ~,
5. Print
Si~ature
Si~ature/'
. ~' ~'l
Silage
Siv tur Z _
10. Print
Signature
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cueamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
Signa~e
Si~amre ~ ·
S,~amrek~~ ~
Si~ature ~ ~ ~
8. Print
Silage
9. Print
Silage
10. Print
Signa~e
PETITION
We the undersigned, request your assistance in securing a
freeway soundwall to protect our neighborhood from the elevated
Route 30/210 Freeway between Rochester Avenue and Woodruff Street
in Rancho Cucamonga.
NAME ADDRESS
1. Print ~ri-,c°~ .~/~5L~£ [~.~35~ L~'t~o ~
Signamre~ ~
Si~amre~ ~
3. Print
Si~amre
4. Print
Si~ature
5. Pdnt
Si~amre
6. Print
Si~amre
7. Print
Si~amre
8. Print
Si~amre
9. Print
Signat~e
10. Prim
Signature
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --reg: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FISLS-NCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~J~ount Tlrpe Subs Rel To Note
AP00173936 004490 A /~ J CHEESE CO 09/26/01 60.36 MW OH
AP00173937 000001 AA EQUIP~NT R~NT~J~S CO INC 09/26/01 22.15 MW OH
AP00173938 003087 ABC DISTRIBUTING INC 09/26/01 80.01 MW OH
AP00173939 002732 A~C LOCKSMITHS 09/26/01 645.61 MW OH
AP00173940 001334 ABLAC 09/26/01 294.06 MW OH
AP00173941 004013 ACCESS TO FREEDOM 09/26/01 400.00 MW OH
AP00173942 002579 ACCOUNTABILITY CONCEPTS 09/26/01 1,500.00 MW OH
AP00173943 000211 ~DT SECURITY SERVICES INC 09/26/01 1,104.84 MW OH
AP00173944 001098 AG ENGINEERING INC 09/26/01 1,727.61 MW OH
AP00173945 004339 ALL ~4ERICAN EQUIPMENT 09/26/01 4,934.00 MW OH
AP00173946 006172 ~J~TA LOMA CHA~RTER LINES 09/26/01 2,106.00 MW OH
AP00173947 004546 ALVARDO SNAP ON TOOLS, ERIC 09/26/01 11.50 MW OH
AP00173948 002693 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 09/26/01 514.68 MW OH
AP00173949 004492 ANTIQUE COKE MACHI~S 09/26/01 16.79 MW OH
AP00173950 004552 APOSTOLIC CHURCH/FOUNTAIN OF 09/26/01 180.00 MW OH
AP00173951 001823 ~CR WIRELESS 09/26/01 2,987.31 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173952 005807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 09/26/0'1 1,456.00 MW OH
AP00173953 004511 ARENAS, HELEN 09/26/01 72.00 ~ OH
AP00173954 004782 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTI~L SERVICES 09/26/01 1,200.51 MW OH
AP00173955 006255 ASSI SECURITY 09/26/01 2,422.50 MW OH
AP00173956 002437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 09/26/01 3,767.50 MW OH
AP00173957 001402 ASSOCIATED POWER INC 09/26/01 1,194.33 MW OH
AP00173958 004508 AURE, LINDA 09/26/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00173959 002677 B~LDY FIRE AND SAFETY 09/26/01 1,074.50 MW OH
~P00173960 002981 BEARD PROVENCRER ~/gD ASSOC 09/26/01 2,973.00 MW. OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CRECK REGISTER Pa~e 2
WED, SSP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCEER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIAU%NCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173961 021027 BER/q Nk~RIES 09/26/01 447.86 MW OR
AP00173962 004441 PEST BUY CO INC 09/26/01 117.14 ~ OH
AP00173963 006438 BLACK VOICE NEWS, THE 09/26/01 78.00 MW OH
AP00173964 004485 BLOMBERG ~ BENSON 09/26/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00173965 003608 BLOOMINGTON CESSPOOL 09/26/01 500.00 MW OH
AP00173966 004494 BOGDA/~OFF, MIKE 09/26/01 35.00 MW OR
AP00173967 004500 BRYILNT, D~NECIA 09/26/01 135.00 MW OH
AP00173968 004512 BUCKBOD~D CATERING CO, THE 09/26/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00173969 005341 BUCK~IAMAND ASSOCIATES 09/26/01 1,313.20 MW OR
AP00173970 004493 C ~ C VISION INC 09/26/01 36.81 ~ OH
AP00173971 004403 C3%LIFORNIA PAVE~N~f N~%INT CO 09/26/01 15,865.60 MW OH
AP00173972 001223 CALSENSE 09/26/01 1,440.94 MW OH
AP00173973 004495 C~DONA, YESENIA 09/26/01 50.00 MW OR
AP00173974 004505 CASTILLO, TERESA 09/26/01 138.00 MW OH
AP00173975 000068 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 09/26/01 870.91 MW OH
AP00173976 000266 CERTIFIED A~O C~ 09/26/01 3,628.43 MW OH
AP00173977 000069 CHAFFEy JOINT ~ION HS DISTRI 09/26/01 23,520.00 ~ OH
AP00173978 004491 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 09/26/01 5.40 ~5~ OH
AP00173979 004497 C}~O, PONY 09/26/01 100.00 NW OR
AP00173980 000488 CHEVRON USA INC 09/26/01 218.93 ~ OH
AP00173981 004323 CINGGI~%R INTERACTIVE LP 09/26/01 4,122.35 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173982 003140 CIVIC SOLUTIONS 09/26/01 13,554.00 MW OH
AP00173983 005533 CI~Y~ON GROUP SERVICES INC 09/26/01 936.75 MW OH
AP00173984 004489 CLEARLY TEE WAY 09/26/01 15.00 N/~ OR
AP00173985 004510 CLOUSTON, DII%NE 09/26/01 50.00 ~ OR
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 55807 #$052 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00173986 004949 CLOSET 09/26/01 80.00 MW OH
AP00173987 001328 CONC-~ASgON, EHA~RI 09/26/01 199.50 ~5~ OH
AP00173988 003773 COOPER, NOPJ~AN L 09/26/01 200.00 ~5~ OH ~R
AP00173989 006711 CORPORATE PRIN~fERS 09/26/01 1,491.56 ~5~ OH
AP00173990 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 09/26/01 318.50 F54 OH
AP00173991 001437 CPRS 09/26/01 80.00 MW OH
AP00173992 001410 CRESTWOOD CORPORATION 09/26/01 1,800.00 ~ OH
AP00173993 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00173994 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 09/26/01 38,601.29 ~ OH
AP00173995 000938 CURRIE GENERAJ~ ENGINEERING 09/26/01 1,000.00 5~W OH AR
AP00173996 000789 CUTTING EDGE L~NDSCAPE INC 09/26/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00173997 002512 D A R E AMERICA 09/26/01 5,010.62 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00173998 090402 D~NIELS TIP~E SERVICE 09/26/01 53.97 ~ OH
AP00173999 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO 09/26/01 2,825.65 MW OH
AP00174000 004544 DICK, ERIC 09/26/01 325.00 MW OH
AP00174001 000839 DIETERICH ~NTEP, NATIONAL TRUCK 09/26/01 459.01 ~ OH
AP00174002 003875 Dbl~N EDWARDS CORPORATION 09/26/01 166.07 MW OH
AP00174003 004205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC 09/26/01 58.95 MW OH
AP00174004 000439 EASTbt%N KOD~ CO 09/26/01 583.00 F/~ OH
AP00174005 004547 EBERSOLE GP, APRIC DESIGN 09/26/01 91.38 MW OH
AP00174006 003364 EIGHTH AVEN"JE GRAPHICS 09/26/01 1,480.52 F~4 OH
AP00174007 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE NOME SERVICE 09/26/01 4,986.00 MW OR
AP00174008 004468 ESCOBAR, S~=NTIAGO 09/26/01 70.00 ~ OH
AP00174009 001669 ESPINAL, hL~iqCY 09/26/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00174010 004549 ESPOSITO, TEP~ESA 09/26/01 138.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--lo~: FI~L~NCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174011 004550 EXPRESS BLINDS ~ DP~APERIES 09/26/01 12.63 MW OE
AP00174012 000779 EZ REN~ALS 09/26/01 590.80 ~5~ OH
AP00174013 041026 FALKEN TIP~E CORPORATION 09/26/01 96.23 NS~ OH
AP00174014 000123 FEDER~L EXPRESS CORP 09/26/01 384.08 MW OH
AP00174015 000155 FI~RSKY AND WA~ 09/26/01 297.50 MW OE
AP00174016 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 09/26/01 3,660.25 MW OH
AP00174017 006440 FLUOR~SCO LIGHTINQ 09/26/01 318.25 MW OH
AP00174018 002485 FOOTHILL SELF STORAGE 09/26/01 360.00 ~ OH
AP00174019 000098 FORD PRIN~fING ~/qD MAILING INC 09/26/01 795.72 MW OH
AP00174020 041198 FORECAST GROUP LP,THE 09/26/01 448.87 MW OH
AP00174021 001144 FR3%~4E ART 09/26/01 135.45 MW OH
AP00174022 004555 FRANZOSO, SUN-HYE 09/26/01 48.00 MW OH
AP00174023 004556 FLr~LERTON GLASS COMP/~gY 09/26/01 90.80 ~ OH
AP00174024 006232 GADABOUT TOURS INC 09/26/01 429.00 ~ OH
AP00174025 080050 GEOGRAPEICS 09/26/01 11,359.53 MW OH
AP00174026 004557 GOUIN EXCAVATING ~ BACKHOE 09/26/01 18.90 MW OH
AP00174027 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 09/26/01 71.68 MW OH
AP00174028 004486 GUARDI~ 09/26/01 2,921.28 MW OH
AP00174029 005699 }~qAL~OS BEVEBAGE COMPS%NY 09/26/01 369.82 MW OH
AP00174030 004531 HAd{MON INTER/qATIO~U%L INDUSTRI 09/26/01 161.25 MW OH
AP00174031 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 09/26/01 890.19 MW OH
AP00174032 002255 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 09/26/01 215.00 MW OH
AP00174033 003633 HO~LESS OUTREACH PRG~g ~ E 09/26/01 308.00 MW OH
AP00174034 004172 HOMESAFE INC 09/26/01 1,774.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174035 001234 HOSE ~ INC 09/26/01 402.96 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R f G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --reg: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FI~t~NCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174036 003634 HOUSE OF RL~H 09/26/01 633.00 ~ OH
AP00174037 004483 HOUSTON, VIRGINIA 09/26/01 189~50 ~ OH
AP00174038 004484 NUNKINS, RUTN 09/26/01 133.00 MW OH
AP00174039 001325 HDRST, CHERYL 09/26/01 313.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174040 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS iNC 09/26/01 2,541.90 MW OH
AP00174041 004254 IBM CORPORATION 09/26/01 6,653.73 MW OH
AP00174042 090900 ICEO IFCI 09/26/01 463.32 ~ OH
AP00174043 004503 IESNA PUBLICATIONS 09/26/01 351.25 MW OH
AP00174044 002577 I~{AGE CO~R3NICATIONS 09/26/01 1,537.25 ~ OH
AP00174045 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 09/26/01 184.09 MW OH
AP00174046 005144 INFORMATION FOR PUBLIC AFFAIR 09/26/01 275.00 MW OH
AP00174047 004364 INL~D PLt~4BING INC 09/26/01 34.20 ~W OH
AP00174048 000122 INLARq) VALLEY DAILY Bb'LLETIN 09/26/01 6,419.00 MW OH
AP00174049 006497 INSIGHT DIP~ECT 09/26/01 292.11 MW OH
AP00174050 090925 INSIGHT 09/26/01 7,476.89 ~ OH
AP00174051 003452 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND S/LND 09/26/01 60.00 MW ON
AP00174052 032067 JI~ENEZ, YOI~%NDA 09/26/01 5,000.00 ~ OH ~
AP00174053 005283 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES 09/26/01 1,250.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174054 004372 JONES, JAN 09/26/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00174055 000179 KAISER FOtSgDATION HEALTH PLAN 09/26/01 41,902.16 M~ OH
AP00174056 004548 KAZEMZJ%DER, WILMA ELLIS 09/26/01 110.00 MW OH
AP00174057 002220 KELLY PAPER COMPA~Pf 09/26/01 99.53 MW OH
AP00174058 004514 KENDLE, NICK 09/26/01 300.00 MW OH
AP00174059 004449 KIKY TOYS 09/26/01 1,500.00 MW OH
AP00174060 005059 KINKOS COPIES 09/26/01 50.74 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFPS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174061 004982 KOP~lgDA CONSTRUCTION 09/26/01 9,210.60 MW OH
AP00174062 032058 KORTEKAAS, PATRICIA 09/26/01 33.00 MW OH
AP00174063 005545 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 09/26/01 357.50 MW OH
AP00174064 004515 I~% BELLE, Nk~Ry ANN 09/26/01 5.00 MW OH
AP00174065 002633 L~%M, JACK 09/26/01 618.81 MW OH
AP00174066 000195 ~CB SOLL ~2gD LUNG~L~D 09/26/01 16.59 MW OH
AP00174067 000321 I~/gDSCAPE WEST INC 09/26/01 1,837.00 MW OH
AP00174068 000849 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 09/26/01 497.62 MW OH
AP00174069 001005 LIL STITCH 09/26/01 273.59 MW OH
AP00174070 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 09/26/01 10,155.13 MW OH
AP00174071 003582 LINGENFELTER, SANDI 09/26/01 120.00 ~ OH
AP00174072 005274 LI~LE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 09/26/01 95.00 MW OH
AP00174073 004519 LITTLE CAESERS 09/26/01 21.46 MW OH
A~00174074 030436 LOS ANGELES BUSINESS JOUP~ 09/26/01 69.95 MW OH
AP00174075 005662 LOS A/qGELES COCA COI~% BTL CO 09/26/01 498.06 MW OH
AP00174076 001336 LOWER, DA]~LENE 09/26/01 251.00 MW OH
AP00174077 002587 L~rTERMAN, GEORGE 09/26/09 1,088.00 MW OH
AP00174078 004181 LY, TIFFD~NY 09/26/01 133.00 MW OH
AP00174079 004564 M A H ELECTRIC INC 09/26/01 23.70 MW OH
AP00174080 003846 M LABS USA INC 09/26/01 10,745.70 MW OH
AP00174081 004526 ~CE, RICHARD 09/26/01 72.00 MW OH
AP00174082 032550 ~L%DISON, ERIN 09/26/01 1,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00174083 003925 ~dv~kRIL, ;~%~N-MARIB 09/26/01 72.00 MW OB
AP00174084 000549 ~t~RIPOSA HORTICULTbq~AL ENT IN 09/26/01 467.63 MW OH
AP00174085 000072 MARK CHRIS INC 09/26/01 136.35 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CRECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID~ Payee Name Date Check A~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174086 004523 ~U~RTINEZ, SUS~ 09/26/01 140.00 ~5~ OH
AP00174087 004520 ~%STERS, KE~fLE 09/26/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00174088 006085 MC~RDLE, KEVIN 09/26/01 21.00 MW OH
AP00174089 00k025 MCMASTER C~ SUPPLY COMP;~ 09/26/01 320.60 MW OH
AP00174090 006214 MICROAGE COMPUTERb~T 09/26/01 469.00 MW OH
AP00174091 000749 MIJAC /~ COMP~4Y 09/26/01 411.00 MW OH
AP00174092 003860 MOBILE MINI INC 09/26/01 79.07 MW OH
AP00174093 001754 MOORE, DAVE 09/26/01 84.76 MW OH
AP00174094 004521 MOP, ENO, VICTORIA 09/26/01 36.40 MW OH
AP00174095 005885 MORITA, DUANE 09/26/01 5,671.00 MW OH
AP00174096 003978 MUNIFINANCIAL INC 09/26/01 4,406.45 MW OH
AP00174097 000435 N F P A 09/26/01 290.00 MW OH
AP00174098 001332 N M A DUES C/O BAR~RA WHITE 09/26/01 13.85 MW OH
AP00174099 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 09/26/01 411.57 MW OH
AP00174100 002837 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION R~N~fALS 09/26/01 1,175.00 N~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174101 000744 NATIONAL DEFEP~RED 09/26/01 23,244.81 MW OH
AP00174102 006687 NATIONS ~NT 09/26/01 3,075.59 MW OH
AP00174103 004527 NIKPO~R, MOH/~D 09/26/01 105.00 MW OH
AP00174104 000433 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 09/26/01 1,002.69 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174105 000712 NORRIS REPKE INC 09/26/01 1,140.00 MW OH
AP00174106 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 09/26/01 4,111.58 MW OH
AP00174107 005403 OFFICE MAX 09/26/01 476.01 MW OH
AP00174108 003943 OLD TOWN BAKING COMPA/~Y INC 09/26/01 30.00 ~W OH
AP00174109 005461 ORC~L~3~D SUPPLY H~,R/3W~RE 09/26/01 994.52 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174110 004200 ORCO BLOCK CO 09/26/01 81.24 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCRER--leg: GL JL--lo¢: FINA/4CE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174111 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 09/26/01 1,135.42 MW OS
AP00174112 001441 PACIFIC BELL 09/26/01 110.79 MW OH
AP00174113 000338 PACIFIC EQUIP ~ IRRIGATION 09/26/01 572.90 MW OH
AP00174114 004529 pARSAC 09/26/01 15,447.00 }~W OH
AP00174115 005409' p~RTS~t~STER INC 09/26/01 1,015.56 ~ OH
AP00174116 005635 PC MAGAZI~ 09/26/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00174117 004530 PC PERSON~ COMPUTERS 09/26/01 6.19 MW OH
AP00174118 000757 PEP BOYS 09/26/01 72.66 MW OH
AP00174119 006205 PETER~ LL~4BER 09/26/01 282.19 MW OH
AP00174120 004267 PETES ROAD SERVICE 09/26/01 1,241.29 MW OH
AP00174121 031828 PETSMART INC 125 09/26/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00174122 006211 PIONEER STANDA/{D ELECTRONICS 09/26/01 37,491.18 MW OH
AP00174123 000272 PITNEY BOWES 09/26/01 220.38 MW OH
AP00174124 007211 PITTENGER, CHRISTINA 09/26/01 200.00 MW OH
AP001~4125 091629 PORTER CABLE CORPORATION 09/26/01 27.52 MW OH
AP00174126 004401 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 09/26/01 61.81 MW OH
AP0017412~ 004387 PRIMA VERA ITALIAN GRILL 09/26/01 46.00 MW OH
AP00174128 000583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES 09/26/01 3,141.77 MW OH
AP00174129 004388 pRUDENTIAL C~IFORNIA P~TY, 09/26/01 45.45 MW OH
AP00174130 000065 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 09/26/01 15.40 MW OH
AP00174131 004496 PRUITT, SHEP~RY 09/26/01 50.00 MW OW
AP00174132 004335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AU 09/26/01 22,461.25 MW OH
AP00174133 001323 QUINTANA, ZITA 09/26/01 193.00 MW OH
AP00174134 011862 RAGAN CO~ICATIONS 09/26/01 129.00 MW
AP00174135 000264 P~PHS GROCERY CO~ 09/26/01 106.72 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H H C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIAL%NCH---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l~37>--report id: CF~REG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ;%mount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174136 005174 P~%NCHO CUC~J~ONGA F~J~ILY YMCA 09/28/01 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00174137 004472 P~EDINGER, TOM 09/26/01 70.00 MW OH
AP00174138 001324 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 09/26/01 282.50 MW OH
AP00174139 005618 RICHARDS WATSON ~ND GERSHON 09/26/01 27,236.21 MW OH
AP00174140 004474 RIVAS, MIGUEL 09/26/01 70.00 MW OH
AP00174141 000276 RIVERSIDH BLUEPRINT 09/26/01 1,429.69 MW OH
AP00174142 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 09/26/01 734.00 MW OH
AP06174143 000626 ROBLES SR, HAUL P 09/26/01 211.00 MW OH
AP00174144 004532 ROCKSOLID GP~%NIT INC USA 09/26/01 138.80 MW OH
AP00174145 004533 ROEHL, ~J~LISON 09/26/01 90.00 MW OH
AP00174146 001298 SAN BERN COUNTY ASSESSORS OFF 09/26/01 936.00 MW OH
AP00174147 001590 SAN BERN COLS~TY CHILD SUPPORT 09/26/01 289.68 ~ OH
AP00174148 001590 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 09/26/01 412.35 MW OH
AP00174149 001590 SAN BHRN COL~qTY CHILD SUPPORT 09/26/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00174150 000301 SAN BEP~N COUNTY SHERIFFS 09/26/01 949,630.33 MW OH
AP00174151 000301 SAN BERN COUNTy SHERIFFS 09/26/01 88.00 MW OH
AP00174152 000300 SAN BHP~N COL~NTy 09/26/01 660.00 MW .OH
AP00174153 000150 SAN BERN CO~3NTy 09/26/01 50.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174154 000132 SD/4 DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 09/26/01 511.70 MW OH
AP00174155 003883 SAPIEN, R~4ON 09/26/01 20.00 MW OH
AP00174156 001105 SEAJ~ FURNITURE AND SYSTEM INC 09/26/01 750.00 MW OH
AP00174157 012062 SECC CORP 09/26/01 1,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00174158 003968 SHCRET~Y OF STATE 09/26/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00174159 001829 S}L~RED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 09/26/01 3,116.40 MW OH
AP00174160 011847 SHARP SEATING 09/26/01 484.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~AgCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CK-REG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174161 006728 SHAW CONTRACT FLOORING 09/26/01 420.00 MW OH
AP00174162 004535 SHIER, HARRY H 09/26/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00174163 004539 SROUP, CARRIE & PHIL 09/26/01 72.00 MW OH
AP00174164 000351 SIGN SHOP, THE 09/26/01 282.51 MW OH
AP00174165 001327 SMART ~ FINAL 09/26/01 365.08 MW OH
AP00174166 000319 SO C~J~IF GA~ COMP;tNY 09/26/01 377.02 MW OH
AP00174167 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/26/01 0.00 VM OR Void
AP00174168 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174169 VOID.CONTINn3 Void - Continued Stub 09/26/01 0.00 %74 OH Void
AP00174170 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174171 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 09/26/01 23,207.24 MW OH
AP00174172 002992 SOUTHWEST SCHOOL AND OFFICE S 09/26/01 31.16 MW OH
AP00174173 005722 SPECTRA COMPAI~Y 09/26/01 1,400.00 MW OH
AP00174174 001335 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE 09/26/01 99.30 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174175 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 09/26/01 1,005.24 MW OR
AP00174176 005281 STERICYCLE INC 09/26/01 163.74 MW OH
AP00174177 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 09/26/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00174178 004733 SU~TRISE FORD 09/26/01 4.68 MW OH
AP00174179 005685 SURE SHRED DOCU~ENT DESTRUCTI 09/26/01 328.00 MW OR
AP00174180 006411 SWEETS CLEAN SWEEP 09/26/01 9,300.00 MW OH
AP00174181 004572 TAGGART MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR 09/26/01 8.10 MW OR
AP00174182 012713 TANDEM 09/26/01 23.00 MW OR
AP00174183 000836 TARGET SPECIALTy PRODUCTS 09/26/01 72.20 MW OH
AP00174184 002344 TARGET 09/26/01 423.49 MW OH
AP00174185 002234 TCM LLC 09/26/01 29.42 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174186 006642 TIDEM~.RK COMPUTERS SYSTEMS IN 09/26/01 18,931.00 ~ OH
AP00174187 004563 TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC 09/26/01 86.39 MW OH
AP00174188 004738 TRINITY DIVERSIFIED INC 09/26/01 291.57 MW OH
AP00174189 003388 TRUGREEN LD/qDCARE REGIONAL 09/26/01 21,485.00 MW OH
AP00174190 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 09/26/01 1,600.00 MW OH
AP00174191 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 09/26/01 1,479.17 MW OH
AP00174192 001226 UNITED P~RCEL SERVICE 09/26/01 87.57 MW OH
AP00174193 000919 13NITED WAY 09/26/01 632.32 MW OH
AP00174194 000919 UNITED WAY 09/26/01 40.00 MW OH
AP00174195 004296 UPSCO 09/26/01 3,450.00 MW OH
AP00174196 004558 US GUARDS CO INC 09/26/01 6,698.05 MW OH
AP00174197 004565 VALDEZ, JOSE 09/26/01 10.00 MW OR
AP00174198 000358 VEND U VENDING 09/26/01 131.52 MW ON Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174199 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 09/26/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174200 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 09/26/01 3,997.86 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174201 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/26/01 948.68 MW OH
AP00174202 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/26/01 96.75 MW OH
AP00174203 001103 VISTA PAINT 09/26/01 151.77 MW OH
AP00174204 005870 VL SYSTEMS INC 09/26/01 1,325.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174205 000441 VL SYSTEMS 09/26/01 3,050.00 MW OH
AP00174206 001329 VOLM, LIZA 09/26/01 112.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174207 002340 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 09/26/01 695.84 MW OH
AP00174208 004566 WAGONER, JO~NE 09/26/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00174209 004002 WASTE M~dqAGEMENT 09/26/01 99.32 MW OH
~P00174210 000213 WAXIE 09/26/01 1,151.32 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 09/26/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 12
WED, SEP 26, 2001, 4:33 PM --req: KFINCEER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~NCE---job: 55807 #S052 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174211 006681 WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM SOVA 09/26/01 654.75 MW OH
AP00174212 004405 WEST END ~CA 09/26/01 455.43 MW OR
AP00174213 004570 WESTERN DOOR 09/26/01 180.60 MW OH
AP00174214 003985 WILLIAMS, PAT 09/26/01 108.00 MW OH
AP00174215 004324 WOODBINE HOUSE 09/26/01 578.15 MW OH
AP00174216 004571 WORLD EMPLOYMENT & CONSULTING 09/26/01 18.70 MW OH
AP00174217 005658 X PECT FIRST AID AND SAFETY 09/26/01 182.67 MW OH
AP00174218 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 09/26/01 294.49 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void ~chine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 6
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 1527,905.52 Number of Checks Processed: 277
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number o~ Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 1527,905.52
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED~ OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND/qCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174280 006451 A ~ A AUTOMOTIVE 10/03/01 193.50 MW OB Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174281 004490 A D~ND J CHEESE CO 10/03/01 60.36 MW OB
AP00174282 004635 A A~ND K PEOTOGRAPHY 10/03/01 27.88 MW OB
AP00174283 002732 ABC LOCKSMITBS 10/03/01 423.62 MW OH
AP00174284 004347 ACCURATE SMOG AUTO ~ TRUCK 10/03/01 205.00 MW OB
AP00174285 006309 ADD~MSON, RObULLD 10/03/01 3,584.00 MW OB
AP00174286 006199 ALL AMERICAN ASPBALT 10/03/01 70,970.47 ~4W OH
AP00174287 006201 ALTEC INDUSTRIES 10/03/01 515.14 MW OH
AP00174288 000492 AMERIC~ PLD-NNING ASSOCIATION 10/03/01 235.00 MW OH
AP00174289 004609 DJ4ERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNE 10/03/01 30.00 MW OH
AP00174290 002693 ~34TECB ELEVATOR SERVICES 10/03/01 140.68 MW OH
AP00174291 001823 ARCH WIRELESS 10/03/01 272.45 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174292 003060 ~CBITECTLq~AL DIGEST 10/03/01 39.98 MW OH
AP00174293 001291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 10/03/01 472.00 MW OB
AP00174294 000667 ARROWHE~J~ CREDIT UNION 10/03/01 8,179.85 MW OH
AP00174295 002014 ARTISTIC SIGNATURES 10/03/01 4,371.68 MW OH
AP00174296 004782 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10/03/01 811.35 MW OH
AP00174297 006255 ASSI SECURITY 10/03/01 135.00 MW OE
AP00174298 006207 AL~DIO EDITIONS 10/03/01 17.12 MW OB
AP00174299 004102 B ~ K ELECTRIC WBOLESALE 10/03/01 5,795.60 MW OH
AP00174300 000372 BLUE HAVEN POOLS 10/03/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00174301 004699 BORDNER, ~GIE 10/03/01 240.00 MW OH
AP00174302 004589 BOSTON, KIM 10/03/01 200.00 MW OB
AP00174303 005525 BOWERY, ROBERT 10/03/01 146.71 MW OH
AP00174304 004369 BROD;LRT BOOKS 10/03/01 1,330.62 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... pro~: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174305 004585 BROOKES PUBLISHING 10/03/01 509.07 F~ OH
AP00174306 002440 BURRUSO, LISA 10/03/01 36.00 FS~ OH
AP00174307 001001 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10/03/01 140.43 NS~ OH
AP00174308 005746 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 10/03/01 10,125.20 MW OH
.AP00174309 001113 CALIFOP~NIA CONTRACT CITIES AS 10/03/01 560.00 FN{ OH
AP00174310 004584 CALIFOP~NIA CPTED ASSOCIATION 10/03/01 50.00 ~K~ OH
AP00174311 003308 CALIFORNIA SNACK FOODS 10/03/01 1,241.22 MW OH
AP00174312 004586 CALTBCH 10/03/01 125.00 MW OH
AP00174313 004602 CAMPOS, DENISE 10/03/01 45.00 MW OH
AP00174314 003828 CAPITOL ENQUIRY INC 10/03/01 42.29 NW OH
AP00174315 004506 CAROTHERS, HEATHER 10/03/01 85.50 MW OH
AP00174316 000068 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 10/03/01 270.90 MW OH
AP00174317 006655 CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFEC 10/03/01 906.51 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174318 001061 CH/~gPION AWARDS ~ SPECIALIE 10/03/01 15.05 MW OH
AP00174319 000073 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 10/03/01 95.37 MW OH
AP00174320 004587 CL$%RION HOTEL WORTHINGTON 10/03/01 193.38 ~ OH
AP00174321 004588 CLARION UNIVERSITY OF PE~SYL 10/03/01 290.00 ~ OH
AP00174322 002841 CI~RY CORPORATION 10/03/01 42,838.75 MW OH
AP00174323 006197 CLASSIC STITCH E~ROIDERY CO 10/03/01 1,577.83 5fW OH
AP00174324 000633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICDJ~ DISTR 10/03/01 591.25 MW OH
AP00174325 006709 COPP CRUSHING, DAN 10/03/0~- 40.00 ~ OH
AP00174326 004583 CRAFTS~L~N BOOK COMP~gY 10/03/01 48.10 ~ OH
AP00174327 004419 CREATIVE DATA PRODUCTS 10/03/01 1,342.42 ~ OH
AP00174328 000085 CUCDJ~ONGA CO WATER DIST 10/03/01 13,427.54 ~ OH
AP00174329 003962 CUSTOM FIT BOWLING SUPPLY 10/03/01 5.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C X R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED^ OCT 03, 2001, 3:S4 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: C~REG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174330 000604 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 10/03/01 260.00 MW OH
AP00174331 002512 D A R E ~4ERICA 10/03/01 1,801.94 ~ OE Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174332 000239 D ~ K CONCRETE COMP~NY 10/03/01 3,867.28 MW OH
AP00174333 000105 D~N GUERRA ~ND ASSOCIATES 10/03/01 2,000.00 ~ OH
AP00174334 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO 10/03/01 153.56 ~5~ OH
AP00174335 000347 DAY TIMERS INC 10/03/01 49.43 ~ OH
AP00174336 002882 DBX INC 10/03/01 75,366.00 MW OH
AP00174337 004604 DEER CREEK VILLAGE PLAZA 10/03/01 37.46 MW OH
AP00174338 005846 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 10/03/01 1,445.71 MW OH
AP00174339 004366 DEMCO INC 10/03/01 577.90 ~[W OH
AP00174340 003909 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 10/03/01 29,145.12 ~ OH
AP00174341 000107 DETCO 10/03/01 73.19 MW OH
AP00174342 000839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 10/03/01 204.17 MW OH
AP00174343 005809 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 10/03/01 173.03 MW OH
AP00174344 003307 DMS I~NDECAPE SERVICES 10/03/01 109,708.99 MW OH
AP00174345 004605 EARICKSON, MELODIE 10/03/01 100.00 ~5~ OH
AP00174346 004607 EASI FILE 5~%/~JFACTURING CORP 10/03/01 235.84 ~5~ OH
AP00174347 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GR3~PHICS 10/03/01 2,220.40 ~ OH
AP00174348 003806 ETIW~2~DA SCHOOL DISTRICT 10/03/0i 1,540.00 ~ OH
AP00174349 004914 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 10/03/01 47.30 MW OH
AP00174350 005521 EXPERIAN 10/03/01 50.00 ~ OH
AP00174351 003144 FAST AIR CORP 10/03/01 2,398.33 MW OH
AP00174352 002103 FAUST PRIN~fING INC 10/03/01 3,082.78 ~ OH
AP00174353 000123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 10/03/01 38.78 MW OH
AP00174354 000666 FII~%MENT PRO AUDIO 10/03/01 15.05 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZJ~LE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174355 006556 FINESSE PERSONq~EL ASSOCIATES 10/03/01 7,093.94 MW OH
AP00174356 005892 FIRST PI~%CE TROPEIES 10/03/01 255.25 ~ OH
AP00174357 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 10/03/01 701.01 M~ OH
AP00174358 003142 FLSkGTI~ 10/03/01 1,170.00 MW OH
AP00174359 004879 FLEET GI~%SS 10/03/01 258.50 ~4W OH
AP00174360 000476 FOOTHILL PROFESSIONAL BUILDIN 10/03/01 10.00 FS~ OH
AP00174361 004098 FORBES 10/03/01 19.99 MW OH
AP00174362 002840 FORD OF UPLAArD INC 10/03/01 210.52 MW OH
AP00174363 003886 FORREST ~s/gUFACT~ING CO INC 10/03/01 150.48 MW OH
AP00174364 001082 FP~ANKLIN COVEY CO 10/03/01 81.83 ~ OH
AP00174365 000227 G S NERY F~D INC 10/03/01 43.00 MW OH
AP00174366 004540 GALE GROUP,THE 10/03/01 94.15 MW OH
AP00174367 003356 GARCIA, VIVIAN 10/03/01 111.18 MW OH
AP00174368 005288 GARRETT CONCRETE CORING ~=ND S 10/03/01 300.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174369 005955 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 10/03/01 103.80 MW OH
AP00174370 000093 GOVER/~MENT FINA/~CE OFFICERS A 10/03/01 120.00 MW OH
AP00174371 000650 GRAINGER, WW 10/03/01 664.89 MW OH
AP00174372 004306 GRATING PACIFIC INC 10/03/01 2,682.13 MW OH
AP00174373 006084 HADDON, DAWN 10/03/01 80.59 MW OH
AP00174374 004173 HARRIS, CHRISTOPHER 10/03/01 26.91 ~K~ OH
AP00174375 032605 ~AVEN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATE 10/~3/0~ 60.00 ~ ON
AP00174376 000462 HCS CL~LER STEEL CO 10/03/01 275.79 MW OH
AP00174377 004845 HILLSIDE COM~INITY CHURCH 10/03/01 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00174378 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 10/03/01 1,329.95 ~ OH
AP00174379 001234 HOSE Finn INC 10/03/01 853.43 MW OH
CITY OF ~C IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FISL~NCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... prop: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174380 000161 HOYT LL~4BER CO, S M 10/03/01 510.49 ~ OH
AP00174381 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 10/03/01 262.10 MW OH
AP00174382 004188 ID BURR 10/03/01 104.28
AP00174383 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 10/03/01 254.53
AP00174384 005193 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 10/03/01 232.00 MW
AP00174385 090933 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 10/03/01 278.21 MW OH
AP00174386 001827 ITE 10/03/01 35.00 MW
AP00174387 031822 JAVA CITY 10/03/01 52.59 MW
AP00174388 003935 JENKINS, SALLEY 10/03/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00174389 004128 KELLY EQUIPMENT 10/03/01 98.18 MW OH
AP08174390 033011 KERDUS PLASTERING INC 10/03/01 65.40 MW OH
AP00174391 000149 KING, LD 10/03/01 14,518.64 MW OH
AP00174392 006193 KLAMATH BAY 10/03/01 530.56 MW OH
AP00174393 001024 KOCH MATERIALS COMP~NY 10/03/01 76.66 MW
AP00174394 001075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 10/03/01 405.48 MW OH
AP00174395 000321 LANDSCAPE WEST INC 10/03/01 123,695.95 MW OH
AP00174396 004590 LANG HOMES, JOHN 10/03/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00174397 000849 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 10/03/01 451.06
AP00174398 006045 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 10/03/01 176.00 MW OH
AP00174399 003367 LEMON, ROBERT 10/03/01 85.22 MW OH
AP00174400 004517 LEYBA, DENISE 10/03/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00174401 000727 LOGUE, SALLY 10/03/01 25.00 MW OH
AP00174402 000200 LOS ANGELES TIMES 10/03/01 117.75 'MW OH
AP00174403 003156 LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC 10/03/01 135.63 MW OH
AP00174404 002587 LUTTEPJ~N, GEORGE 10/03/01 1,024.00 MW OH
CITY OF ~C IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZ~J~E--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56898 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174405 004595 M A/qD J PROPERTIES 10/03/01 10.88 MW OE
AP00174406 001062 M C I WORLDCOM 10/03/01 896.78 MW OH
AP00174407 031908 M D STAINLESS SERVICES INC 10/03/01 190.60 MW OH
AP00174408 000549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 10/03/01 8,016.65 MW OH
AP00174409 000072 MARK CHRIS INC 10/03/01 458.84 MW OH
AP00174410 004727 MARSHALL PLUMBING 10/03/01 178.00 MW OH
AP00174411 004591 MARTINEZ COUNSELING SERVICES 10/03/01 52.19 MW OH
AP00174412 003840 MCVAY, IDA 10/03/01 51.00 MW OH
AP00174413 002198 MICNAELS STORES INC 3019 10/03/01 296.75 MW OH
AP00174414 004592 MICRO SURFACE 10/03/01 114.00 MW OH
AP00174415 006214 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 10/03/01 8,473.15 MW OH
AP00174416 008852 MIDWEST TAPE 10/03/01 89.97 MW OH
AP00174417 000842 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAI 10/03/01 334.90 MW OH
AP00174418 004596 MUNICIPAL RISK SERVICES LIMIT 10/03/01 24.95 MW OE
AP00174419 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10/03/01 218.00 MW OH
AP00174420 004598 NATIONAL CLAY PIPE INSTITUE 10/03/01 36.00 MW OH
AP00174421 002837 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 10/03/01 3,250.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174422 002263 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CEN 10/03/01 46.90 MW OH
AP00174423 006687 NATIONS RENT 10/03/01 728.22 MW OH
AP00174424 005719 NORCAL SAN BER/qARDINO 10/03/01 1,500.00 MW OH
AP00174425 003765 NOVALIS TECHNOLOGIES 10/03/01-- 3,000.00' MW OH
AP00174426 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 10/03/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174427 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 10/03/01 8,956.98 MW OH
AP00174428 005403 OFFICE ~ 10/03/01 237.48 MW OH
AP00174429 000365 OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY 10/03/01 954.99 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C B B C K R E G I S T B R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED~ OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGON~%LE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKP~EG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174430 000232 O~ITP~ANS 10/03/01 177~50 MW OH
AP00174431 005461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 10/03/01 4.28 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174432 000235 OWEN ~LECTRIC 10/03/01 105.35 MW OH
AP00174433 001441 PACIFIC BELL 10/03/01 2,823.06 MW OR
AP00174434 005452 PACIFIC UTILITY EQUIP~NT CO 10/03/01 1,733.08 ~5~ OH
AP00174435 006755 PARSONS BRINKERHOFF QUkDE ~=ND 10/03/01 16,795.12 N~ OH
AP00174436 006205 PETEPd~U~N LUMBER 10/03/01 736.70 MW OH
AP00174437 002987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYS 10/03/01 268.40 MW OH
AP00174438 000931 PHYSICIA/~S DESK REFERENCE 10/03/01 69.95 ~ OH
AP00174439 006211 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 10/03/01 9,520.62 N~ OH
AP00174440 000272 PITN~Y BOWES 10/03/01 326.59 ~ OH
AP00174441 006206 PLA/FNING CENTER, THE 10/03/01 613.99 ~ OH
AP00174442 000791 PMIDELTA CARE 10/03/01 1,158.30 ~ OH
AP00174443 000255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 10/03/01 22,599.84 MW OH
AP00174444 001049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 10/03/01 52.40 MW OH
AP00174445 004599 PUBLIC SAFETY TP~AINING CONSUL 10/03/01 594.00 MW OB
AP00174446 005899 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 10/03/01 118.25 MW OH
AP00174447 000251 R ~LND R AUTOMOTIVE 10/03/01 2,664.86 MW OH
AP00174448 002705 R H F INC 10/03/01 61.70 ~g~ OH
AP00174449 000959 R/~DIO SHACK ACCODqqTS RBCEIVAB 10/03/01 1,138.35 MW OH
AP00174450 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMP~/qY 10/03/01 48.71 MW OH
AP00174451 006058 RANCHO SCREEN PRIS7~ ~ E~%BRO 10/03/01 605.23 MW OH
AP00174452 002257 HAULS AUTO TRIM INC 10/03/01 55.00 MW OB
AP00174453 004130 RBM LOCK D/qD ~Y SHRVICE 10/03/01 85.50 MW OH
AP00174454 004472 REDINGER, TOM 10/03/01 105.00 M~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C E E C K R E G I E T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174455 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRIC3%5 SUPPL 10/03/01 559.96 MW OE
AP00174456 004474 RIVAS, MIGUEL 10/03/01 105.00 MW OH
AP00174457 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 10/03/01 418.10 MW OE
AP00174458 004257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPA/~ 10/03/01 62,625.00 MW OH
AP00174459 000418 P~4A GROUP 10/03/01 1,837.00 ~ OB Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174460 004601 ROTH PUBLISHING INC 10/03/01 1,105.00 MW OR
AP00174461 003137 SAFETY CEN~fER 10/03/01 150.00 MW OH
AP00174462 004432 SAN BERN ASSOC GOVERNMENTS 10/03/01 16,200.00 MW OH
AP00174463 000301 S~N BERN CObqqTY SHERIFFS 10/03/01 32.00 MW OH
AP00174464 006492 SA/~CHEZ, JOE 10/03/01 355.00 MW OH
AP00174465 003403 SCEPIOA 10/03/01 50.00 MW OH
AP00174466 001105 SEAL FUR/~ITURE AND SYSTEM INC 10/03/01 2,244.14 MW OH
AP00174467 003896 SENEC~IAL, CAL 10/03/01 337.50 MW OH
AP00174468 001327 SMART AND FINAL 10/03/01 910.40 MW OB
AP00174469 003946 SMITH COMPANY 10/03/01 54.90 MW OH
AP00174470 004610 SO CAL SAi~DBAGS 10/03/01 76.50 MW OH
AP00174471 001825 SOFT CHOICE CORP 10/03/01 159.10 MW OH
AP00174472 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 10/03/01 0.00 VM OB Void
AP00174473 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 10/03/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174474 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 10/03/01 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174475 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 10/03/0r 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00174476 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10/03/01 35,808.74 MW OH
AP00174477 004621 SPAULDING, JOHN 10/03/01 70.00 MW OH
AP00174478 005722 SPECTRA COMPANy 10/03/01 2,829.00 MW OH
AP00174479 011792 STANDARD PACIFIC 10/03/01 7,432.52 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED,. OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Tlmpe Subs Rel To Note
AP00174480 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10/03/01 15,624.08 MW OH
AP00174481 001516 STOVER SEED COMPA/qY 10/03/01 1,075.00 MW OH
AP00174482 004733 SUNRISE FORD 10/03/01 138.09 MW OH
AP00174483 001658 SYSINCT 10/03/01 1,752.24 MW OH
AP00174484 000836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 10/03/01 551.65 MW OH
AP00174485 002344 TARGET 10/03/01 366.00 MW OH
AP00174486 002234 TCM LLC 10/03/01 19.24 MW OH
AP00174487 004569 TEES PLUS 10/03/01 75.00 MW OH
AP00174468 003942 TERMINIX IN"TEP~NATIONAL 10/03/01 1,001.00 MW OH
AP00174489 004559 THAYER, WARREN 10/03/01 200.00 MW OH
AP00174490 000814 THEME WAREHOUSE INC 10/03/01 2,735.63 MW OH
AP00174491 001919 TO~RK SPORTS INC 10/03/01 51.60 MW OH
AP00174492 004563 TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC 10/03/01 165.29 MW OH
AP00174493 003388 TRUGREEN iJ~NDCARE REGIONAL 10/03/01 3,236.00 MW OH
AP00174494 006554 TURCH ~ ASSOCIATES, DAVID 10/03/01 4,000.00 MW OH
AP00174495 006060 U S T MONITOR REPAIR 10/03/01 2,273.38 MW OH
AP00174496 004788 UNDERGROL~ND SVC ALERT OF SO C 10/03/01 517.50 MW OH
AP00174497 003437 LrNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 10/03/01 984.20 ~ OH
AP00174498 004206 LS~IQUE CREATIONS 10/03/01 239.19 ~ OH
AP00174499 001226 LS~ITED PARCEL SERVICE 10/03/01 64.00 MW OH
AP00174500 004623 VASQUEZ SR, RUBEN 10/03/01 70.00 ~W OH
AP00174501 004597 VAST PROMOTIONS 10/03/01 2,150.00 ~5~ OH
AP00174502 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 10/03/01 484.01 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174503 001103 VISTA PAINT 10/03/01 240.80 ~ OH
AP00174504 002340 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 10/03/01 283.48 MW OH
CITY O~ RC IFAS (PROD) 10/03/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10
WED~ OCT 03, 2001, 3:54 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 56896 #S047 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00174505 000046 VULCAN CALMAT ASPHALT 10/03/01 373.07 MW
AP00174506 004002 WASTE MANAGEMENT 10/03/01 99.03 MW
AP00174507 000213 WAXIE 10/03/01 1,165.72 MW
AP00174508 006681 WEST END HI3NGER PROGP~%M SOVA 10/03/01 695.75 MW
AP00174509 006727 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 10/03/01 21.95 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00174510 002681 WILLIAJ~S, DIA/~E 10/03/01 584.21 MW OH
AP00174511 012046 WL HOMES LLC 10/03/01 82.50 MW OH
AP00174512 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 10/03/01 27,058.67 MW OH
AP00174513 004624 YEE, I~RRY 10/03/01 50.00 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 5
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 868,283.27 Number of Checks Processed: 229
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 868,283.27
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
September 30, 2001
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM
Investments Value Value Value Pon'folio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Funds 24,647,908.83 24,647,908,83 24,647,908.83 18.94 1 1 4.440 4.502
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515.000.00 1,517,303.25 1,515,000,00 1.16 119 59 3.400 3.447
Federal Agency issues - Coupon 102,000,000.00 104,529,100.35 101,945,231.25 78.38 1,715 1.338 5.831 5.912
Treasury Securities - Coupon 2,000,000.00 2,025.625.00 1,995,937.50 t .53 731 122 6.396 6.485
Mortgage Backed Securities 298.75 303.29 296.60 0.00 5,426 92 8.219 8.333
Investments 130,163,267.58 t32,828,240.72 t30,104,374.18 180.08% 1,357 1.051 5.548 5.625
Cash and Accrued interest
Passbook/Checking 315,089.98 315.089.98 315.089.98 I I 1.973 2.000
(not included in yield calculations)
Acc~ed Interest at Purchase 15,347.50 15,347.50
Subtotal 330,437.48 330,437.48
Total Cash and Investments 130,478,297.56 133,150,678.20 130,434,811.66 t ,357 1,051 5.548 5.625
Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 609,261.54 1,873,199.96
Average Daily Balance t 3t,002,075.7t t 32,506,950.t 2
Effective Rate of Return 5.66% 5.6t%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in cemformity with the investment policy adopted October 4, 2000. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)-Intsrac0ve Data CorporaUon pdcing service.
The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond dccamenta
r
Portfolio CITY
CP
~Run Date: 10/10r2001 o 07:18 PM (PRF_PMI) SymRept VS.02f
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
September 30, 2001
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment ~ issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Ba~e Moody's 360 Maturity D~fA
Local Agency Investment Funds
00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 24,647,908.83 24,647.908.83 24,647,908.83 4.502 4.440 1
Subtotal and Average 24,881~242.16 24,647,908.83 24,647~g08.83 24~647,g08.83 4.440 t
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
06050 E. ZF5 1111 BANK OF AMERICA 08/02/2001 1,515,000.00 1.517.303.25 1,515,000.00 3.400 3.400 59 11/29/2001
Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,517,303.26 1,515,000.00 3A00 59
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331RAA3 00988 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/27/1997 2,000.000.00 2,038.485.72 2,000,000.00 6.620 6.529 177 03/27/2002
31331RDX0 00996 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/17/1997 2,000,000.00 2.055,563.96 1,g99,375.00 6.240 6.162 289 07/17/2002
3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/O6/1998 2,000,000.00 2,081.167.91 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 462 01/C5/2003
31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,075,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.730 5.652 1,211 01/24/2005
3133t LFFO 1087 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/11/2001 2,000,000.00 2,001,875.00 2,000,000.00 5.520 5.444 1,288 04/11/2005
31331LGR3 1095 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05K}8/2001 2,000,000.00 2,006,875.00 2,000.000.00 5.g50 5.868 1.680 05/03/2006
31331LGR3 1097 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/O3/200t 2,000,000.00 2.006,875.00 2.000,000.00 5.950 5.868 1,680 05/08/2006
31331LHD3 1100 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/24/2001 2,0~0.000.00 2.037,500.00 1,991,250.00 5.600 5.624 1,687 05/15/2006
31331LKE7 1107 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/14/200t 3,000,000.00 3,063.750.00 2,997,000.00 5.560 5.512 1,352 06/14/2005
31331LMP0 1109 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/16/2001 2,000,000.00 2,050,000.00 1,997,812.50 5.750 5.696 1,751 07/13/2006
3133M2US4 01003 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01~6/1998 1,000,000.00 1,043,750.00 1,000.000.00 6.230 6.145 462 01/06/2003
3133M6NE4 01035 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/08/1998 2,000,000.00 2.093,750.00 2,000,000.00 5.530 5.454 798 12~6/2003
3133M75D4 01038 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/21/1999 1,000,000.00 1,047,812.50 1,000,000.00 5.510 5.435 842 01121/2004
3133M86L3 01043 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/23/1999 3,000,000.00 3,093.750.00 3,000,000.00 5.755 5.676 357 09/23/2002
3133Mg4J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,210,000.00 2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 990 05/17/2004
3133M96K3 01053 FEDERAJ. HOME LOAN BANK 06/25/1999 2,000,000.00 2,058,750.00 1,996,875.00 6.480 6.428 1,001 05/23/2004
3133MARK7 1059 FEDERAJ. HOME LOAN BANK 02/25/20{X) 2,000,000.00 2,035,625.00 1 ,g99,687.50 7.000 6.910 512 02/25/2003
3133MBHV2 1062 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/25/2000 2,000,000.00 2,066,875.00 1,g94,375.00 7.890 7.850 1,323 03/16/2005
3133MCX34 1076 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3.115,312.50 2,997,187.50 5.760 5.707 1,211 01/24/2005
3133MFBP2 1103 FEDER*N. HOME LOAN BANK 05/30/2001 2,000,000.00 2,082.500.00 1,999,062.50 5.8Q0 5.731 1,702 05/30/2006
3133MF7E2 1105 FEDERAL HOME LOAN E~ANK 06/06/2001 2.000,000.00 2,081,875.00 2,000.000.00 5.750 5.671 1,709 06/06/2006
3133MFGAO 1106 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/14/2001 2,000,000.00 2,014,376.00 2,000.000.00 6.060 5.977 1,717 06/14/2006
3133MGBV7 1110 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07124/2001 2,000,000.00 2,051,875.00 1,999,375.00 5.800 5.728 1,757 07/24/2006
3t2923GH2 1078 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/14/2001 2,000,0C~.00 2,020.627.75 2,000,000.00 6.000 5.918 1,697 02/14/2006
312923MQ5 1081 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/20/200t 1,000,000.00 1,028,915.86 1,000,000.00 5.625 5.548 1,631 03/20/2006
312923MJ1 1082 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 03/21/2001 4,000,000.00 4,038,783.57 4,000.000.00 5.700 5.622 1,632 03/2112006
312923SM8 1086 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/10/2001 4,000,000.00 4.108,531.50 4,000.000.00 5.510 5.435 1,652 04/10/2006
312923ZB4 1096 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05~8/2001 6,000,000.00 6,128,879.70 6,000,000.00 5.520 5.444 1,680 05/08/2006
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 3
Portfolio Details - Investments
September 30, 2001
Average Pumhase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment 8 Issuer Balance Date Par Value Mall(et Value Book Value Bate Moody's $60 Maludty Date
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
312923ZY4 1098 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/09/2001 5,000,000.00 5,059,034.73 5,000,000.00 8.700 5.622 1,681 05/09/2006
312923H99 1102 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/30/2001 3,000.000.00 3,013,361.66 3,000,000.00 6.000 6.918 1,702 05/30/2006
31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,093,247.99 2,000,000.00 6.128 6.041 595 05/19/2003
31364KPT1 1065 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/06/2000 3,000,000.00 3,109,687.50 3,000,000.00 7.875 7.767 1,344 05/06/2005
31364KR36 t077 FEDERAl. NATL MTG ASSN 02/05/2001 4,000,000.00 4.105,000.00 3,g99.375.00 5.625 5.553 1,039 08/05/2004
31359MOV9 1079 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/05/2001 3,000.000.00 3,031,875.00 3,000,000.00 5.450 5.374 864 02/12/2004
3136FOAL6 1085 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/04/2001 4,000,000.00 4,t43,750.00 3,994,375.00 5.300 5.259 1,640 05/29/2006
3136FODW9 1088 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/11/2C~1 2,000,000.00 2,033.125.00 2,000,000.00 5.650 5.573 1,653 04/11/2006
3136FOEVO 1091 FEDERAL NATL MTO A~SN 04/24/2001 2.000,000,00 2,035,000.00 1,999,200.00 5.750 5.680 1,659 04/17/2006
3136FOEW8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,106,937.50 2,997,000.00 5.510 5.457 1,659 04/17/2006
3136FOLU4 tt01 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,099,375.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,696 05/24/2006
3136FOMC3 1104 FEDERAJ- NATL MTG ASSN 06/05/2001 2,000,000.00 2,012,500.00 2,000.000.00 6.000 5.918 1,708 06/05/2006
3136FORV6 1108 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN 07/18/2001 2,000,000.00 2.048.125.00 1,998,750.00 5.750 5.685 1,738 07/05/2006
Subtotal and Average t0~,945,331.25 t 02,000,000.00 104,629,100.35 101,945,33t ~5 5.83t 1,338
Treasury Securities - Coupon
9128275)(6 1058 TREASURY NOTE 01/31/2000 2,000,000.00 2,025,625.00 1,995,937.50 6.378 6.396 t22 01/31/2002
Subtotal and Average 1,995,937.50 2,000,000.00 2,025,628.00 t,995,987.50 6.396 t22
Mortgage Backed Securlt[as
313401WW7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/25/1987 298.75 303.29 296.60 8.000 8.219 92 01/01/2002
Subtotal and Average 383.12 298.78 303.29 296,60 8~.19 92
Total Investments and Average 130,337,794.04 t30,t83~07.58 132,820,240.72 t30,104,374.18 5.548 1,05t
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
Management Page 4
Portfolio Details - Cash
September 30, 2001
Cash Accounts
Po~folio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio
~nanagemen; Page 5
Investment Activity By Type
September 1, 2001 through September 30, 2001
Local Agency investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
Treasury Securities - Coupon
Portfolio CITY
CP
(PRF_PM3)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended August 31,200t
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Pavina Anent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 N/A* 3.20% $ 257,311.00
Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.78
Reserve Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 N/A* 3.20% 242,520.00
Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 N/A 3.20% 157,728,00
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.25
$ 657,560.03
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds sedes US Bank Expense Fund First Arnedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 3.10% $ 0.04
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (St) & t999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 3A 0% 613,251.00
Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.21
St. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 3.10% 1,152,066.00
Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.48
Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 N/A* 3.10%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation 3/2/00 N/A* 3.10% 76,274.00
Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.51
Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/91 N/A* 3.10% 548.00
Cash N/A N/A N/A 0.17
$ 1,842,140.41
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $~2~499,700.44
* Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated motedty da~ as they may be liquidated upon demand.
~ i:~financeICash with Fiscal Agents.xls 9/25/01 3:56 PM
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~
BY:
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE 6TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1182303565011324182-0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the 6t~ Street Pavement
Rehabilitation from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue, and approve the attached resolution
authorizing the City. Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The 6ta Street pavement rehabilitation improvements will consist of pavement reconstruction, grinding and
AC overlay from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue, which will extend the life of the pavement, create
a better ride for vehicular traffic and improve the aesthetics of the street. The project will be funded from
AB 2928 funds (Account No. 11823035650/1324182-0). Staff has determined that the project is
Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines.
The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The
Engineer's estimate is $256,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $2,000 estimated for
construction survey, and $500 estimated for soils and material testing. Legal advertising is scheduled for
October 23, 2001 and October 30, 2001, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 13,
2001, unless extended by Addenda.
Resl~submitted, . ~
Wil~ia~p,'J. 0'~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachments: Vidnity Map and Resolution
ONTARIO CIW LIMIT
~ROJ~CT
LOCATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
6TH STREET PAVEMENT RE~BI~TATION
FROM HEL~ A~NUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
VICINITY MAP
RESOLUTION NO. 0]-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "6TM
STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE" IN
SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE
BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and
specifications for "6TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN
AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for
doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said
advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bcmardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GWEN that
said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
November 13, 2001, sealed bids or proposals for the "6TM STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE" in
said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the 6TM STREET PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 2
required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a
similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than
the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that
regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is
required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies
of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall
cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as
penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each
laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if
such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages
herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under
him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing
tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee '
nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship
program in that trade for a certiftcate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of
apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio
of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to
the request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of
one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide
or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than
one apprentice to eight journeymen.
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 3
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the
administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or
jour-neymen in uny apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the
public works site are making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of
Sections 1777.5 und 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, und other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Fruncisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship
Standards and its brunch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in
the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall
comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with
working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of
the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of
the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before
mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is
required or permitted to labor more thun eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute
the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in
the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code
Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or
bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for un amount equal to at least
10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed
contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract
said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Runcho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any
shall be retumed to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for
said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 4
amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the
payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done
thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries
compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract
which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the
construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor
shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all
applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this
contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering
Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the
work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the
Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et.
seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califorma Business and Professions Code," Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the
..... expiration date, and be. signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that
the information being provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available
at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00
(THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder,
copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by
payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of
$15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set
forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole
cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance
retention).
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 5
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the fight to reject any or all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 17th day'of October, 2001
Publish Dates: October 23 and 30, 2001
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this 17th day of October, 2001.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of
said City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2001
Executed this 17th day of October, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: October 23 and 30, 2001
R A N C H O C U C ^ M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEDART~IE N T
Staff Report
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A, Dyer, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING
BIDS" FOR THE BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Banyan Street right
turn lane west of Milliken Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to
advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Banyan Street right turn lane improvement will consist of constructing a right tuCn lane and
reconstructing the trail on the south side of Banyan Street at Milliken Avenue, which will help with the
movement of traffic at the intersection when it becomes signalized with the construction of the new High
School. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article19, Section 15301(c) of
the CEQA guidelines.
The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The
Engineer's estimate is $81,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional $1,000 estimated for
construction survey, $600 estimated for soils and material testing, and $1,200 estimated for relocation of
one street light. Legal advertising is scheduled for October 23, 2001 and October 30, 2001, with a bid
opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 13, 2001, unless extended by Addenda.
Respectfully submitted,
City Efigineer
WJO:JAD
Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution
PROJECT
ON
NTS
8TH 5T ~
GTH 5T
ONTAI~IO CITY LIMIT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE
SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET WEST OF MIIJJKEN AVENUE
VICINITY MAP
RESOLUTIONNO. O[ - 22~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BANYAN
STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN
AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEWE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucam0nga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and
specifications for "BANYAN STREET RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for
doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said
advertisemen.t, shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
November 13, 2001, sealed bids or proposals for the "BANYAN STREET RIGHT
TURN LANE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the BANYAN STREET
RIGHT TURN LANE WEST OF MILL1KEN AVENUE".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is
required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a
similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 2
the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that
regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is
required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies
of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall
cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as
penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each
laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if
such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages
herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under
him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing
tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee
nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship
program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of
apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio . . ' ·
of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to
the request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of
one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its
membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide
or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than
one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the
administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or
journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the
public works site are making such contributions.
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 3
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of
Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship
Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in
the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall
comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with
working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of
the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of
the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of thc work herein before
mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is
required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute
the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in
the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code.
Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or
bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least
10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed
contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract
said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any
shall be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for
said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an
amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the
payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done
thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries
compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 4
which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the
construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor
shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all
applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this
contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering
Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the
work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the
Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et.
seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the
expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that
the information being provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available
.at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of · '
Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00
(THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder,
copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by
payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of
$15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set
forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole
cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance
retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 17th day of October, 2001
RESOLUTION NO.
October 17, 2001
Page 5
Publish Dates: October 23 and 30, 2001
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, this 17th day of October, 2001.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of
said City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2001
Executed this 17th day of October, 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: October 23 and 30, 2001
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council,
City Manager, Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DECLARE SURPLUS MISCELLANEOUS CITY-
OWNED EQUII~MENT
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council gives approval to surplus the City owned equipment on the
attached listing, which is no longer needed, obsolete or unusable.
BACKGROUND
The City's purchasing manual identifies two major categories of surplus property:
materials and supplies, and capital equipment. It is the policy of the City to request that
the City Council provide authorization to the Purchasing Agent to dispose of City
property by declaring such items surplus. Methods of disposition can be transferred to
another department, trade-in, sale by bid 0r auction, sale as scrap, donation, or simply
trashing.
As the replacement of various pieces of equipment has occurred, the miscellaneous items
listed are surplus to the City's need and should be disposed of.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Attachments
cc: Sharon Leonard
SURPLUS INVENTORY
TAG NUMBER MAKE/MODEL DESCRIPTION SERIAL NUMBER
196 Panasonic TV CTH2579R
1430 David 800 Arm Extenstion Exercise Equip 28099
000166/001076 Xeroxtelecopier 7024 5L3086370
000174 Xerox 5053 2Y5050147
000502 Draftmaster P, X7596B 3002A02266
001383 Xerox 7020 telecopier, fax machine 98G019780
001586 RCA selectavision Model VKT275 430610565
00506 Calcomp 9100 Digitizing Table 21770
00517 Epson LQ 2500 Printer 11015308
00592 ISI 4500 Breathing Tank
00593 ISI 4500 Breathing Tank
00594 ISI 4500 Breathing Tank
00595 ISI Ranger SCBA
00596 ISI Ranger SCBA
00597 ISI Ranger SCBA
00638 Earmark Communication Belt Pack F885, F889
00639 Earmark Communication Belt Pack F886, F890
00643 Neotronics Oxygen Tester
00827 Xerox 5018 71P190293
01189 Hewlett Packard Fax 900 JPA3C15070
01347 Xerox 5053 2Y5047655
01357 Sharp SF7370 Copier 46607828
01360 Sharp SF7370 Copier 46607098
02008 Xerox 5355 3T8205375
02027 Xerox 5385 88Y008313
B-27-H Ceramic Kiln 7411
E257 Quintrix III TV 7341331
E269 Craig Cassette System 28200172
E270 Craig Cassette System 28100731
E273 Craig Cassette System 28200213
F510 Grey/BIk TV Cart n/a
n/a Xerox 5018 71P173269
n/a Xerox 5090 W81079780
n/a Grey Cabinet Cart n/a
Ladder with handrails n/a
Mitsubishi Video Projector VS-1200 100275
Mitsubishi Video Projector VS-1200 100506
Xerox 1020 Copier 330402
4 Luxfor 2216 Breathing Tank
Sigma Multistation Battery Charger
Sigma Water Sampler
Fall 2001 surplus item list Page I
I SURPLUS INVENTORY I
TAG NUMBER MAKE/MODEL DESCRIPTION SERIAL NUMBER
1219 1990 PB Patch Truck, Veh 652 1HTSDZ7R3MH304195
1220 1990 PB Patch Truck, Veh 653 1HTSDZ7R5MH304196
00529 Homelite Cut-off Saw, Veh E5025 2240024
n/a Husqavarna Chain Saw n/a
1342 1990 Taylor Dunn Electric Cart, #0596 96057
n/a 90lb Air Hammer n/a
n/a 90lb Air Hammer n/a
n/a (2) Two S-10 Camper Shells n/a
Fall 2001 surplus item list Page 2
City of Rancho Cuacmonga 0, 0,200
Network Port Count
Make Model Ports Comment Location
Digital Multiswitch 624T 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber Cit f Hall UL-RDA
Digital Multiswitch 624T 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber Cit f Hall UL-MGR
Digital Multiswitch 624T 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber Cit ~ Hall PL-ComSRV
Digital Multiswitch 624T 50.00 2x24RG45, 2Fiber Cit ~ Hall PL-B&S
Digital Multiswitch 624T 74.00 3x24RG45, 2Fiber Cit ~ Hall PL-FIN
Digital Multiswitch 624T 50.00 2x48RG45, 2Fiber Cit ~ Hall PL-ENG
Digital Multiswitch 624T 50.00 2x48RG45, 2Fiber Cit f Hall PL-PLN
Digital Multiswitch 624T 24.00 24RG45 Cit ~ Hall LL-FIRE
Digital Multiswitch 624T 24.00 24RG45 Cit ~ Hall LL-COMRM
Digital Multiswitch 624T 24.00 24RG45 Yard
Digital Multiswitch 624T 24.00 24RG45 FIRE STAY2
Digital Multiswitch 624T 26.00 24RG45,2Fiber LIBRARY
VN900 Multiswitch VN900LL 24.00 24Fiber
Multiswitch 900 MS FE 924TXG 24.00 24RG45
VN900 Multiswitch VN900EE 24.00 24RG45
VN900 Multiswitch VN900EE 24.00 24RG45
VN900 Multiswitch VN900EX 14.00 14RG45
VN900 Multiswitch VN900EX 14.00 14RG45
VN900 Multiswitch VN900EX 14.00 14RG45
VN900 Multiswitch VN900EX 14.00 14RG45
HP Advance Stack HP J2601A 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber
HP Advance Stack HP J2601A 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber
HP Advance Stack HP J2601A 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber
HP Advance Stack HP J2601A 26.00 24RG45, 2Fiber
SYNOPTICS 96.00 96RG45
Total Port count: 1,063.00
I oral Fort count for 776~10-17-2001 Staff Report
Fiber Optic (1st Phase)
I
trade in:
THE CITY
SlaffRe rt
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE
ETIWANDA AREA MASTER PLAN FOR FY 2000/2001 AND
APPROPRIATE $17,345.00 FOR FUND 1116303-5650
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $17,345.00 for
Fund 1116303-5650 for Etiwanda Area Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement
Agreements for FY 2000/2001.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS:
Etiwanda Area Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements are based on the net
Etiwanda Drainage funds received each fiscal year. The remaining funds in the
Etiwanda Drainage Fund will be utilized for City projects.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SH:sc
Attachment
'/7
T H E CITY O F
I~AN Cfi O CU Ch~lO N GA
I I
Staff Report
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY: Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager ~
DATE: October 17, 2001
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR ]'lie PURCHASE OF FOUR (4) FORD F-250 HEAVY
DUTY SUPER CAB TRUCKS WITH UTILITY BODIES FROM RACEWAY
FORD~ OF RIVERSIDE~ IN THE AMOUNT OF $105~509.10, FUNDED FROM
FUND 1712-001-5604~ AND THE PURCHASE OF TWO (2) FORD F-250 HEAVY
DUTY TRUCKS WITH DUMP BEDS FROM FRITTS FORD~ OF RIVERSIDE~ IN
THE AMOUNT OF $49,885.16~ FUNDED FROM FUNDS: 1134-303-5604~ 1133-
303-5604 AND 1712-001-5604
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the pumhase of four (4) Ford F-250 heavy duty
super cab trucks with utility bodies from Raceway Ford, of Riverside, in the amount of $105,509.10,
funded from fund 1712-001-5604, and the purchase of two (2) Ford F-250 heavy duty trucks with
dump beds from Fritts Ford, of Riverside, in the amount of $49,885.16, funded from funds: 1134-
303-5604, 1133-303-5604, and 1712-001-5604.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
City Council approved the purchase/replacement of these vehicles as identified in the fiscal year
2001/2002 budget document under accounts 1712-001-5604, 1134-303-5604, and 1133-303-5604.
Maintenance provided specifications to Purchasing for the new vehicles. Purchasing prepared a
Request for Bid and sent it to twelve (12) vendors. Eight (8) responses were received. After
analysis of the competitive bids by Greg Gunski, Maintenance Supervisor, and Purchasing Staff, it
has been determined that Raceway Ford is the responsive and responsible vendor that meets the
specifications required by the Engineering Department, Facilities Division, for the four (4) F-250
heavy duty super cab trucks with utility bodies and that Fritts Ford is the responsive and responsible
vendor that meets the specifications required by the Engineering Department, Parks Division, for
the two (2) F-250 heavy duty trucks with dump beds.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
T H E C I T Y 0 F
[
I~ANCHO CUCAYlONCA
Staff Report
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY: Robert Bowery, Information Systems Manager
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF COMPUTER
HARDWARE FOR THE CITYWIDE DOWNSTREAM PROGRAM
UPGRADE AND REPLACEMENT, FROM FUTURE COMPUTING
SOLUTIONS, INC. AS THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER IN THE
AMOUNT OF $254,920.61 AS APPROVED IN THE FY 2001/02
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the replacement purchase of
computer hardware for the citywide downstream program upgrade and replacement of
computer equipment from Future Computing Solutions, Inc. in the amount of
$254,920.61 from account 1714001-5605 as approved in the FY 2001/02 budget.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In the FY 2001/2002 Budget, the City Council approved the purchase of the
replacement of personal computers as identified in the budget document.
The Purchasing Division solicited proposals for the replacement of personal computers
that have exceeded their service life. Purchasing mailed out 22 requests for proposals
on September 19, 2001. Bid specifications were also posted, via the City's web page.
After receipt and careful analysis of the responses, Future Computing Solutions, Inc.
was selected as the lowest responsible bidder.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
LT:RB:da
R ^ C H O C U C A M O N G a
Staff Report
DATE: October 2, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Gary Varney, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF TWO (2) ELGIN
BROOM BEAR STREET SWEEPERS FROM HAAKER EQUIPMENT
COMPANY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, THROUGH A PIGGY BACK/
COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA, FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1-712-001-5603
IN THE AMOUNT OF $298,226.50
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize the replacement purchase of two (2) Elgin Broom
Bear Street Sweepers from Haaker Equipment Company, of Pomona, California. Through a
piggy back/cooperative purchase agreement with tlie City of Alhambra, California, funded from
account 1-712-001-5603 in the amount of $298,226.50.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In January, staff began reviewing Street Sweeper specifications for the replacement of two (2)
Mobil M-9A Broom Street Sweepers. After careful analysis staff recommended the replacement
sweepers be the Elgin Broom Bear Sweeper with options because of its ability to work
effectively in heavy debris and meeting all new AQMD requirements. Staff was able to fmd the
best option and reach an agreement with the City of Alhambra and Haaker Equipment Company
of Pomona, California, through a Piggy Back/Cooperative purchase agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:dlw
1' H E C I 1' Y 0 F
I~AN C 1~0 CUCAI~ONGA
StaffReF
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Karen McGuire-Emenj, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: APPROV/~L OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE NAPA
SOCCER COMPLEX PROJECT FROM THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-
HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM
UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER,
CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution which
authorizes staff to submit the grant application for funds for the Napa Soccer
Complex Project from the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation
Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal
Protection Bond Act of 2000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The purpose of the Roberti-Z'Berg-Harfis Urban Open Space and Recreation
Program is to fund high priodty projects that satisfy the most urgent park and
recreational needs in California. $3,779,000 is available to applicants statewide in
this competitive grant program. These funds are intended to supplement, not
supplant, local expenditures for park and recreation facilities. The maximum grant
amount available for a project is $250,000. The State requires a 30% match of
funds that must come from nonstate monies. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, as a
city with a population less than 300,000, located in an urbanized area, is eligible to
apply for these competitive grant funds.
The City's Recreation Needs Assessment generated in conjunction with the General
Plan Update identifies a deficit of 23 soccer fields per the city's current population.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
NAPA SOCCER COMPLEX PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION
October 17, 2001
Page 2
The cost of purchasing land and developing this large number of fields to meet the
current need would be staggering. Therefore, staff has been working with California
Speedway to develop an agreement that would provide a unique public/private
partnership on the Napa Street site. This partnership would allow the City to
construct the soccer complex on the site without restricting the use of the site for
vehicle parking by the Speedway during special events. The Napa Soccer Complex
Project will be a two-phase project. Phase 1 is proposed to include six soccer fields,
474 parking stalls, one restroom/concession building, one maintenance/service yard,
lighting, irrigation and all related appurtenances. At a later time, Phase 2 will be
constructed which will be two more soccer fields and parking west of the railroad
spur. The preliminary cost of Phase 1 is estimated at $2,700,000 and has been
budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2001/2002 Park Development Fund budget.
Attached for reference are Exhibit A, the Resolution; Exhibit B, the Location Map;
and Exhibit C, the Site Plan.
ed,
Community Services Director
RESOLUTION NO. O1-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ROBERTI-Z~BERG-HARRIS URBAN
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE
SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR,
AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
For THE NAPA SOCCER COMPLEX PROJECT
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Safe Neighborhood
Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 which provides funds for
the Roberti-Z~3erg-Harris Open Space and Recreation Program; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Caiifomia has enacted the Robetti-Z~erg-
Harris Open Space and Recreation Program, which provides fimds to certain political subdivisions of
the State of California for acquiring lands and for developing facilities to meet urban recreational
needs; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated
the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and
Recreation requke the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of the
Application before submission of said Application to the State; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California for
the Project;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
1~ Approves the filing of an Application for local assistance funds from the Roberti-Z'Berg-
Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks,
Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the
Project; and
3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions
contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and
4. Appoints the City Engineer as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all
documents including, but not limited to, Applications, agreements, payment requests and
so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the Project.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~17~ day of October, 2001.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
D:~kmcguire~grants~napa~eres
EXHIBIT B - LOCATION NAP
Soccer Complex
$
EXHIBIT C - SITE PLAN
TH CITY OF
I~AN Cli 0 CUCA~ONGA
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICp, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolutions of the City Council authorizing grant application for funding of the
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail project.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the attached Resolutions in support of applications for grant funds.
BACKGROUND~ANALYSIS:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, joined together with the San Bemardino
Associated Governments (SANBAG) and surrounding cities, to develop a multi-purpose trail to link the
cities of Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, and Rialto. The purpose of the
trail is to provide recreational opportunities for cyclists, pedestrians, runners, and equestrians. Trail
users will enjoy exercise and convenient access to jobs, public facilities, and shopping, while exploring
the history and culture of the area.
The San Bernardino Associated Governments, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the participating
cities exercised great vision to designate this corridor for trail use. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
designated the corridor for a multi-purpose trail since the adoption of the City's first General Plan in 1981.
This will allow the cities to create a beautiful common area that can be shared by commuters,
pedestrians, cyclists, equestrians, and other non-motorized transportation. The trail is in close proximity
to Metrolink commuter rail stations.
The rail trail follows the former Pacific Electric Railway corridor, which travels east-west through the
Pomona Valley. The Pacific Electric Railway was once the wodd's largest interurban and street railway
system, extending from Los Angeles to its outlying regions. The 21-mile long rail trail will begin in
downtown Claremont and end in downtown Rialto. The trail will also connect to a 6.9-mile Citrus Rail
Trail project being planned from Claremont to San Dimas.
.57
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL
October 17, 2001
Page 2
As the responsible agency for regional transportation planning, the San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG) prepared a Non-Motorized Transportation Plan 2001 Update for San
Bernardino County, which serves as the Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) for the Pacific Electric Inland
Empire Trail project, and recommends said project as a highest pdodty project in the pdmary bikeway
system for the region. The trail includes a Class I Bike Path.
The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(TEA-21) provides funds for recreational trails and trails related projects. California's allocation for this
grant cycle will be approximately $2.2 million for non-motorized trails projects and is available on a
competitive basis. RTP is a matching program that provides up to 80 percent of the project costs. The
grant application was filed on October 1, 2001.
The Non-Motorized Trails Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air,
and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 provides funding for trails and trailside facilities, which increase
public access to, and enjoyment of, public areas for increased recreational opportunities. The amount of
$1.74 million is available statewide on a competitive basis. The grant application was filed on
October 1, 2001.
The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan was presented to the Planning Commission on
November 21, 2000. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. The Master Plan
was presented to the City Council at their December 6, 2000 meeting. Copies of the Master Plan were
given to the Council at that meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad.15~er
City Planner
BB:DC:mlg
Attachments: Resolution Approving Funds from Recreational Trails Program
Resolution Approving Funds from Non-Motorized Trails Program
RESOLUTION ~)/"' 2 ';;j /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE
TRAILS PROJECT FROM THE RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Transportational Equity Act for the 21st Century provides funds to the
State of California for grants to State, local and non-profit organizations to acquire, develop
and/or maintain motorized and non-motorized trail purposes; and
WHEREAS, The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation has been
delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up
necessary procedures governing application under the program, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State of California Department of Parks
and Recreation require the applicant to certify by Resolution the Approval of the application
before submission of said application to the State, and
WHEREAS, said application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with,
and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for
development of the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby:
1. Approves the filing of an application for local assistance funds from the Non-Motorized
Trails under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal
Protection Bond Act of 2000, and
2. Certiiies that said applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of any
work on the Project included in this application, sufficient funds to operate and maintain
the Project, and
3. Appoints the Principal Planner or City Engineer as agent of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but
not limited to application, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be
necessary for the completion of the aforementioned Project.
APPROVED and ADOPTED on the 17th day of October 2001.
RESOLUTION
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE
TRAILS PROJECT FROM THE NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS PROGRAM
UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAR
AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000.
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Non-Motorized Trails
Program, which provides funds to the State of California grants to local agencies to increase
public enjoyment of trails and access to public areas by the use of trails, and
WHEREAS, The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation has been
delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up
necessary procedures governing application by local agencies under the program, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State of California Department of Parks
and Recreation require the applicant to certify by Resolution, the approval of application(s)
before submission of said application to the State, and
WHEREAS, said application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with,
and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for
development of the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby:
1. Approves the filing of an application for local assistance funds from the Non-Motorized
Trails under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal
Protection Bond Act of 2000, and
2. Certifies that said applicant understands the assurances and certification in the
application form, and
3. Certifies that said applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of any
work on the Project included in this applicetion, sufficient funds to operate and maintain
the Project, and
4. Appoints the Principal Planner or City Engineer as agent of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but
not limited to application, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be
necessary for the completion of the aforementioned Project.
APPROVED and ADOPTED on the 17th day of October 2001.
THE CITY OF
I~ANCHO CUCAH ONGA
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FRO~ Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE
TRAIL - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review to determine if the project
may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed project is the
development of approximately seven miles of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire
Trail, a Class I multi-use bicycle, pedestrian, and separated equestrian trail
located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way, which varies in
width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga. The
project also includes the acquisition of the historic Etiwanda Station for
preservation as a museum and trailhead, and the potential acquisition or use of
the historic Casa de Cucamonga, for use as a trailhead. The total area of
development of the trail is approximately 85 acres. The total area of
development associated with the use of the Etiwanda Station for preservation as
a museum and as a staging area for the Trail is approximately 4 acres; for a total
of 89 acres of development.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Proiect: The installation of a multi-purpose trail along an abandoned railroad corridor. The
proposed project will include the following construction activities:
1. 'Construct a Class I bike path from Grove Avenue to 1-15 Freeway.
2. Construct a hiking/equestrian trail from Cucamonga Creek to easterly city limits.
3. Install lighting.
4. · Install signs, mileage markers, and historic displays.
5. Install landscaping and irrigation.
6. Install historic signs and displays.
7. Install trail amenities, including water fountains, benches, trashcans, etc.
8. Install a hierarchy of street crossings, which may include striping, warning signs,
flashing beacons, traffic signals, or grade separations.
9. Install trailhead facilities, including parking, restrooms, water fountains, benches,
trashcans, etc.
10. Reserve a 45-foot wide area for future rail service. ~,/
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL - CITY OF RC
October 17, 2001
Page 2
B. SurroundinR Land Use and Zoninq:
North - Various
South- Various
East - Various
West - Vadous
C. General Plan Desiqnations:
Project Site - Class I Bicycle Path and Community Trail (hiking and riding)
North - Various
South- Various
East - Various
West Various
D. Site Characteristics: The Southern Pacific (former Pacific Electdc Railway) corridor
bisects the middle of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in generally an east-west direction.
The rails have been removed and this abandoned corridor has become blighted and has
caused law enforcement, weed abatement, and fire protection problems. The corridor
contains non-native and ruderal plant species. The Casa de Cucamonga (a County
Museum listed in the National Register of Historic Places) adjoins the south side of the
corridor, east of Vineyard Avenue. The historic Etiwanda Station adjoins the corridor's
north side at Etiwanda Avenue.
ANALYSIS: In 1981, the City's first General Plan established a vision of creating a multi-
purpose trail along the railroad corridor. The City Council approved the Master Plan for the trail
in December of 2000. Environmental clearance is required to proceed with the trail project. The
project will eliminate problems of blight, crime, and property damage associated with the current
abandoned status of the railroad corridor. Current burdens upon City enforcement services
would be dramatically reduced and the overall appearance would be significantly improved.
Implementation of the project will reduce traffic in the community and region by providing for
alternative forms of transportation; will establish an attractive recreational facility; link other
bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails in the City and the region; and provide a means of
direct access to the City's largest planned park, nearby parks, schools, and shopping centers.
The project includes the potential acquisition or lease of the Casa de Cucamonga and Etiwanda
Station for use as trailhead facilities. The existing Casa de Cucamonga parking lot is suitable if
resealed and striped. The Etiwanda Station sits on 4 acres of land suitable for parking and trail
rest area facilities. The Station could be renovated into a Pacific Electric Railway museum.
City Planner
BB:DC:mlg
Attachments: CEQA Initial Study
NEPA Preliminary Environmental Study
ENVIRONMENTAL
INFORMATION FORM
C~o,R,n~oCu.~o.,, (Part I - Initial Study)
Planning Division
(909) 477-2750
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED, Please note that it is the msponsibilily of the applicant to ensure that
the application is complete at the time of subtotal; City staff will not be available to perform won~ required to provide missing
information.
Application Number for the project to which this form
pertains:
Title:
Name&Addmssofdeveloperorpmjec,
Conta~Pe,~on & ~ ~'~'/~~
Add. ss: .pr/
h\PLANNING~INAL~FORMS\COUNTER~INITSTD1.WPD 3/00 Page 1 ~_~,_~i
Name & Address of person prepadn? this form (if different from above):
Numbec
Information indicated by astedak (*) is not required of non-constrection CUP-s unless otherwise requested by staff.
'1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site.
boundaries.
2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west;
views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which se~-~-the site; and representative views of significant
features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photogreph.
:t' mxx-m/ --
4) Assessors Pamel Numbers (attach additional sheet if
necessary):
z~
'6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications):
7)Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet
I:\PLAN NING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER~INITSTD 1.VVPD 3/00 Page2
8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessaq/ from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental
agencies in order to fully implement the project:
9) Descdbe the physical setllng of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Descdbe any existing structures on site
(t~cluding age and condition) and the use of ~he structures. Attach photographs of significant features descdbed. In addition,
site all souYces of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies):
lO)Describe the known cultural and/or histotfcal aspects of the site. Si~ all sources of information (books, published reports and
oral history):
q-rm'/
I:~NNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER~INITS~I.~D 3~ Page 3 ~ ~
11)Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will effect
proposed uses:
~11 ~ul~ ~ th~ p~po~ed
o~r ~ith e~h p~e, ~nd the ~nli~ipa~d ~mplelion ol e~ ink. meaL A~h ~ddi~on~l ~hee~(~) ff ne~:
. .
~)De~6be the ~din~ p~pe~ie~, in~l~din~ info~lion
t 4) Will the proposed project change the pa~tem, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project?
'~n~/~, /~/ ~/~X~/z ~ ~ ~/*~/~w/~/*/
~/D~I ~ml ~~. ·
I:~NN~G~FINAL~RMS~COUN~R~INITSTDI.~D ~00 Page 4
15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How v, fll these noise levels
affect adjacent propertios and on.site oses. What methods of sound proofing are pmposed?
*'6) lndicate pmposed ramovalsand~orraplacementsof matura or scenic traes: NO -~r~ F~mO~/g~/
17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains:
18)Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For fu~her clarification, please contact
the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591.
a. Residential (gal~day). Peak use (gal,~y)
b. Commercial/Ind. (gal~day~ac). Peak use (gal~rain~ac)
19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank ~ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach
percolation tests, ff discha~e to a sanitety sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See
Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cla#fication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dist6ct at 987-
2591.
a. Residential (gal~day)
b. Commercial/ind. (gal~day/ac)
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS:
20) Number of residential units:
Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot
size: K~/~
I:\PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTD1.WPD 3/00 Page 5 Gq
Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units):
21)Anticipated range of sale pdces and/or rents:
Sale Pdce(s) $. to $.
Rent (per month) $. to $.
22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type:.
23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit
~ype:
24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropdate School
Districts as shown in Attachment B:
a. Elementary:
b. Junior High:
c. Senior High
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS
25) Descdbe type of use(a) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional
uses:
26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by
type:
h~LANNING~FINAL~FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI.WPD 3/00 Page
27) Indicate hours of operation:
28) Number of Total:
employees:
Maximum Shift:
Time of Maximum Shift:
29)Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salaq/ ranges, as well as an indication of the rate
of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary):
30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the
City:
*31)For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, typo and amount of airpollution emissions. (Data should be
vedfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283):
ALL PROJECTS
32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their abilify to provide
adequate service to the proposed project? ff so, please indicate their response.
h~LANNING\FINAL~FORMS~COUNTER~INITSTD1,WPD 3/00 Page 7 7~)
331/n the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials?
] Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB=s; radioactive substances; pesticides and
herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above.
Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the preperty, as well as the dates of use, if
known.
34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic
materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? ff yes, provide an inventory of all such reatedals to be
used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be
shown and labeled on the application plans.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate
evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best
of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate
evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucareonga.
h~PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTERUNITSTDI.VVPD 3/00 Page 8 7/
Proposed Foothill Free~ay ~'
Hishlaad Avenue
Road
Ci~ of
Fontana
Foothill Bird ~:
Arrow
1-10
~N O R TH Airport
Area Map
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project Name: Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail
2. Description of Project: PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The proposed project is the development of approximately
seven miles of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a 15 foot paved Class I bike path
and walking trail, and separated 15 foot wide equestrian trail located within the existing
Pacific Electdc Railroad right-of-way, which varies in width from 80 feet to 100 feet,
within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga. The project design includes reserving the
middle 45 feet for future rail transit use. The project also includes the acquisition of the
histodc Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum and trailhead, and the potential
acquisition or use of the historic Casa de Cucamonga, for use as a trailhead. The total
area of development of the trail is approximately 85 acres. The total area of development
associated with the use of the Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum as a
staging area for the Trail is approximately four acres; for a total of 89 acres of
development.
3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
The project is sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in partnership with Caltrans
and the San Bemardino Associated Governments:
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner Ernie Rogers, Local Assistance Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga Caltrans District 8
Department of Planning 464 West Fourth Street
10500 Civic Center Drive San Bernardino CA 92401
Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730
Lisa Poe, Transportation Planner
San Bemardino Associated Govemments
427 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bemardino CA 92401
4. General Plan Designation: Regional Multi-purpose Trail
5. Project History and Setting: The County of San Bernardino purchased the historic
Pacific Electric Railway right-of-way from the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1991, and
then assigned control to the San Bemardino Associated Governments ($ANBAG). In
1999, Rancho Cucamonga, SANBAG, and the cities of Claremont, Montclair, Upland,
Fontana, and Rialto developed the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan. The
Plan archived the Pacific Electric Railway right-of way's transportation history and
developed plans for a 21-mile multi-purpose trail linking the cities from Claremont on the
west to Rialto on the east. The planned 'rail trail' calls for the preservation of a 45-foot
corridor within the right-of-way for potential future transit use and the integration of
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 2
existing transportation infrastructure including links to rail, bus, multi-modal stations, and
local and regional bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian facilities as a Class I multi-use
Trail.
The Master Plan also includes future transit links and multi-modal integration, staging
areas, greenway landscaping, the preservation of historical buildings and transportation
stations along the route, and the development of historical monuments and markers to
commemorate the Pacific Electdc Railway's history and enhance the project and the
communities 'livability'. The rail-trail project will serve broad transportation and recreation
needs in the populated western San Bernardino County. Ultimately, it will also connect to
the proposed 5.9-mile Citrus Regional Bikeway 'rail-with-trail' in the East San Gabriel
Valley, connecting San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties.
The focus of this Initial Study is the development of an approximately seven-mile portion
of the rail-trail within the City of Rancho Cucamonga between the westedy and easterly
city limits. The proposed project also includes the acquisition of the histodc Etiwanda
Station for preservation as a museum and the potential acquisition and use of the
historic Casa de Cucamonga for use as a future transportation park-n-ride/staging area.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA)
funding for this project. This project meets the goals and objectives of the Pacific Electdc
Inland Empire Trail Master Plan by a) developing a portion of the multi-purpose trail; b)
using the histodc Etiwanda Station as a transit link/staging area; and c) preserving an
historic transportation station along the route. The Initial Study includes a series of
photographs to show portions of the route and adjacent land uses. Photographs also
show the Etiwanda Station and its existing land use.
6. Lead Agency Name and Contact Person:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Department of Planning
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2750
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 3
Amethyst Tmilhead (west side)
Cucamonga Creek Channel Crossing West of Vineyard Avenue
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electdc Inland Empire Trail Page 4
East ol Day Creek Boulevard
West of Day Creek Boulevard
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electdc Inland Empire Trail Page 5
Etiwanda Depot Trailhead
East of Rochester
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 6
East of Rochester Looking East
Casa De Cucamonga "Rains House" Trailhead
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electdc Inland Empire Trail Page 7
San Bemardino Road at Cucamonga Creek
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 8
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Cimulation
( ) Population and Housing (x) Biological Resources ( ) Public Sen~ices
(x) Utilities and Service Systems
(x) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (x) Aesthetics
(x) Water ( ) Hazards (x) Cultural Resources
( ) Air Qual ty ( ) Noise
(x) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Recreation
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signed: ~
Debra Meier, Contract Planner
August 30, 2001
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an
explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a
discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Si No
1. LANDUSEAND~ Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
vicinity?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
established community?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 9
Comments:
a-d) Since 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan has identified a
planned trail system to provide a network of interconnecting off-nad trails that
are integrated with recreation and open space, both within and beyond the
community border. The hiking/riding trail system is also intended to connect the
residential and commercial activity centers, as well as the system of on-street
bicycle trails. The regional trails traversing the commercial and industrial areas
of the City also provide a safe and convenient opportunity for bicycling to work,
to shop or for recreation.
The regional trail serves as the backbone of the public trail system, they are
reserved, long distance corridors that serve as the main connection, connecting
regional parks, major open spaces, residential, commemial, and industrial
areas. The regional trails mainly follow flood control channels, utility corridors,
and specifically, the former Pacific Electric Railway right-of-way corridor.
The proposed project is the development of approximately seven miles of a rail-
trail which is part of the larger Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a proposed
Class I multi-purpose trail that follows the existing railroad corridor, traversing
east-west across cities in western San Bernardino County, including the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency,
partnering with Caltrans, SANBAG and surrounding cities in developing the
Master Plan for the entire 21 -mile length of the corridor.
The City has initially applied for a grant from the Statewide Transportation
Enhancements Program to design and construct three miles of the regional trail
(between Haven Avenue and a point approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda
Avenue) and acquire the historic Etiwanda Rail Station which would be
preserved as a museum and used as a transportation park-n-ride and/or staging
area for the trail. The development of the Trail and preservation of the Etiwanda
Station implements the goals of the City General Plan and the Pacific Electric
Inland Empire Trail Master Plan.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~¢~ ~.~, a~.~,~t No
2, POPULATION AND HOl. l~a~ Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ) (x)
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ) (x)
directly or indirectly (e,g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ) (x)
housing?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 10
Comments:
a-c) The construction of the Trail and preservation of the Etiwanda Station will not
displace existing housing. No housing is present within the corridor, no housing
will be removed or demolished due to this project, and no major infrastructure
will be developed that would be considered growth inducing within the
community.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I Significant I Mi~gatio~l
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (x)
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable ( ) ( ) (x)
soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (x)
h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (x)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a/b) The Trail runs adjacent and parallel to the Red Hill Fault within a City-adopted
Special Study Zone at the west side of the City. Beginning near the intersection
of Arrow Highway and Grove Avenue, the Trail and fault are parallel through the
length of the Special Study Zone, which ends near the intersection of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. At this point the Trail takes a more northerly
angle, separating from the inferred fault zone as it continues northeasterly
through the city. The location of the Red Hill Scarp has been determined by
several studies completed in the immediate area; however, they were unable to
determine whether the fault is active. The Red Hill Scarp is on.a trend with the
Etiwanda Avenue Scarp, which is clearly active, as well as the San Jose Fault,
which caused both the 1988 and 1990 Upland earthquakes. Since the Trail is
parallel to, but does not cross the fault within the Special Study Zone,
destruction of facilities is not likely to occur due to fault rupture. However, the
City, as well as the region, is susceptible to ground shaking and a maximum
credible earthquake of 7.0 along the Cucamonga fault, located along the
northern City boundary, can be expected. Adhering to the Uniform Building
Code for the construction of all facilities along the Trail will ensure that geologic
impacts are less than significant.
The Trail turns to a completely east-west orientation near Archibald Avenue,
north of Base Line Road, and then crosses the inferred location of the Red Hill
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 11
fault north of Base Line Road, near the intersection of Haven Avenue and
Valencia Avenue. The inferred segment of the Red Hill fault is drawn on
published maps and the City General Plan Exhibit V-l, to connect the Red Hill
and Etiwanda Avenue scarps. Published locations for this segment of the fault
vary as much as 1,000 feet, and subsurface explorations for the fault have found
no evidence of its existence. Therefore, mitigation through this zone is only
required for critical facilities.
Trail construction will not include the development any critical facilities, and no
mitigation will be necessary. The Etiwanda Station is an existing structure that
will be preserved as a museum. As part of the restoration of the Station and
Casa de Cucamonga, the City Building Official will determine the potential need
to retrofit the buildings to meet current building codes for earthquake safety.
The Depot is located approximately two miles south of the Etiwanda Avenue
Scarp, which is assumed to be an extension of the Red Hill Fault; and
approximately three miles south of the Cucamonga Fault Zone.
c-i) Slopes along the Trail corridor are typically less than 10 percent, therefore, no
special hazards due to slope failure, landslides, mudslides, or erosion ara
present along the majority of the Trail. However, the Trail section along the base
of Red Hill is up to 30 percent natural slope. Since there will be no habitable
structuras, and the Trail is intended for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian usage
only, no motorized vehicles or heavy equipment (except during construction),
the existing slope will not be compromised. Similar to large portions of western
San Bernardino County, geologic conditions through the corridor include alluvial
material and older alluvial fan deposits formed on granitic alluvium of the valley
floor. The corridor does not contain any unique geographical featuras or
constraints due to unstable soils, therefore, adhering to the City grading
standards and the Uniform Building Code for the construction of any structuras
along the Trail will ensura that geologic impacts are less than significant.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources; a~,~ Incorp~atedM~gatl°n $ig~ificent No
4. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, (x) ( )
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) (x)
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) (x)
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) (x)
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) (x)
of water movements?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 12
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant M~tigatlofl Si No
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through intemeption of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
groundwater otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Comments:
a/b) The project will cause minor changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and
the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new
hardscape proposed on the currently unpaved corridor, approximately 85 acres.
Surface runoff from the Trail will be channeled to existing storm drains to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Trail passes through segments of the
100-year flood zone in the following locations: near the intersection of Arrow
Route and Grove Avenue and along Grove Avenue; along Foothill Boulevard at
the base of Red Hill; and at Haven Avenue. Since there will be no habitable
structures, and the Trail is intended for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian usage
only, no motorized vehicles or heavy equipment, Trail development within the
Flood zone would not result in a public safety hazard. The future Casa de
Cucamonga park-n-ride facility may require development of a new parking lot for
up to 40 automobiles, including "pull-through spaces for vehicles with horse
trailers; for a combined total of approximately four acres of impervious surface.
c-i) The proposed Trail corridor Etiwanda Station and Casa de Cucamonga do not
pass near any body of water. Prior to construction, a grading plan will be
prepared illustrating how stormwater runoff will be conveyed. The project will not
interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the corridor is
not used for groundwater recharge.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pom~a~y u,~,~
.npac~ ~ncorpomted
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
or cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 13
Comments:
a) During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be emitted from
grading the Trail alignment, an area of approximately 85 acres, and
development of the parking lot and related facilities for the proposed park-n-ride,
approximately four acres, for a total of 89 acres. Sources of emissions during
construction include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment
and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment
traveling over exposed surfaces. Levels of PM~0 will be minimized through the use
of standard construction watering procedures.
The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emissions Model
(URBEMIS7G). The criteria pollutants screened for included: reactive organic
gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates
(PM~o). Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors. Default values were
used where project specific information was unavailable. Based on the estimated
amount of criteria pollutants to be emitted per day, construction emissions will not
exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance. However, since the South Coast Air
Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM10)
standard construction conditions (i.e. application of water to the project area) will
minimize the project contribution to regional emission of criteria pollutants.
Sensitive receptors in the area include residences adjacent to the proposed trail.
During grading, fugitive dust (PM~o) will be generated. Implementation of
construction conditions of approval will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors are
less than significant.
Table 1
URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary
(Pounds per Day)
Source 'ROG ~Ox " CO PM~o
Grading 1.59 19.30 21.36
Worker Trips 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
Stationan/Equip. 0.34 0.27 0.02
Mobile Equip. 4.52 25.84 5.04
Asphalt 5.30
Totals 11.75 45.42 0.01 26.42
SCAQMDThres. 75 100 550 150
Significance No No No No
c-d) The proposed project is the development of approximately seven miles of the
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a Class I multi-use bicycle, pedestrian, and
separated equestrian trail within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-
way within the Rancho Cucamonga City Limits. The end use of the Trail will not
generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors.
Following construction, the Trail use would be limited to pedestrians, bicyclists
and equestrian riders; therefore, no long-term impacts to air quality are
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 14
associated with the Trail development. The Trail Master Plan includes future
transit links and multi-modal integration and staging areas in order to enhance the
communities 'INability' by potentially reducing the need for vehicle trips within the
community, The project will serve a broad transportation and recreational need in
western San Bernardino County. It will also connect to the proposed 5.9-mile
Citrus Regional Bikeway 'rail-with-trair in the East San Gabriel Valley, connecting
San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties.
PoteotiaiiYlmpact ~gnlltcantP°tentiaJlYurde~lmpact Irnl~a~ Irr~a¢~
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significa~l~MitJ~on Sigllifica~t I~o
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., ( ) ( ) (x)
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) ( ) (x)
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) (x)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ( ) ( ) (x)
bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-g) The proposed Trail project is a joint effort between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Caltrans, SANBAG, and the cities of Claremont, Montclair, Upland,
Fontana, and Rialto in developing a Trail Master Plan for a 21-mile multi-
purpose trail linking all the partner cities. The planned 'rail trail' calls for the
preservation of a 45-foot corddor within the right-of-way for potential future
transit use and the integration of existing transportation infrastructure including
links to rail, bus, multi-modal stations, and local and regional bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.
The Master Plan also includes future transit links and multi-modal integration,
staging areas, greenway landscaping, the preservation of historical buildings
and transportation stations along the route, and the development of historical
monuments and markers to commemorate the Railway's history and enhance
the project and the communities 'livability' by potentially reducing the need for
vehicle trips within the community. The project will serve a broad transportation
and recreation need in western San Bernardino County. It will also connect to
the proposed 5.9-mile Citrus Regional Bikeway 'rail-with-trail' in the East San
Gabriel Valley, connecting San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 15
The ultimate design of the Trail will include a grade separation at Foothill
Boulevard and Carnelian (both have existing bridges) and Milliken Avenue (the
Trail will pass under the street). Master Plan of Trails calls for routing Trail
users to the nearest signalized intersections, when interfacing the Pacific
Electric Inland Empire Trail with the City Trail system.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or ( ) (x) ( )
their habitats (including, but not limited to:
plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)?
~ b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) (x)
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) (x)
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) (x)
vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a) The areas within the City that may provide habitat for endangered, threatened,
or rare species are the North Etiwanda area, (beyond the urban areas), the non-
channelized portions of the major drainage ways of Cucamonga, Deer, Day,
Etiwanda and San Sevaine creeks and those areas underlain by Delhi sand soil.
These areas may provide habitat for the Delhi sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF),
coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN), the San Bernardino kangaroo rat
(SBKR) or other species of concern, such as the Los Angeles pocket mouse
and Plummer's mariposa lily.
The proposed trail follows the former Pacific Electric Rail Road alignment and is
south of the North Etiwanda area. The major creeks have been improved with
concrete linings and the Trail crosses these channels via bridges. The Trail
does not cross any areas of Delhi sands.
The Trail is a clearly defined corridor vegetated with non-native and/or ruderal
species. The Trail improvements will be constructed along the outside 15 to
20 feet of both sides of the corridor, with a 45 foot space in the center to be
landscaped and reserved for potential future transit use. The area around the
existing Etiwanda Station is currently used as a building materials storage yard
with no open space for vegetative growth.
<27
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 16
b) There are no locally designated species, (eucalyptus windrows) or habitats
along the trail alignment.
c) The only designated natural community occurring in the project vicinity is sage
scrub, which occurs along the non-channelized portions of the major creeks and
in the north Etiwanda area. Throughout the project vicinity there are vacant lots
which may contain some elements of the scrub community but typically do not
exhibit the necessary components of habitat for listed species, trees or large
shrubs for nesting or floodway terraces (i.e. CAGN and SBKR). These areas
are isolated from habitat areas, are subject to disturbance from surrounding
urban uses and are generally post disturbance communities.
d) There are no wetlands (marshes, vernal pools, etc.) in the project vicinity. The
only riparian areas in the City are along the non-channelized portions of the
major creeks, which are typically 2.5 miles northerly of the Trail.
e) The only areas that serve to provide wildlife dispersal areas are the North Etiwanda
area and the major drainage ways which are located typically 2.5 miles, or more,
northerly of the Trail.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I ~.w~ I ~o~
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resoumes in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
mineral resoume that would be of future value
to the region and the residents of the State?
Comments:
a-b) The purpose of the proposed Trail improvements is to create a multi-purpose
trail ultimately linking San Bernardino County to Los Angeles County. The Trail
will include a corridor for future transit use and the integration of existing
transportation infrastructure including links to rail, bus multi-modal stations, and
local and regional bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The trail system is intended
to connect the residential and commemial activity centers, as well as the system
of on-street bicycle trails. The regional trails traversing the commemial and
industrial areas of the City also provide a safe and convenient opportunity for
bicycling to work or to shop, thus potentially reducing energy consumption within
the community.
c) The Trail corridor does not pass through any aggregate resource zones within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 17
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si,.,~.t Mitigation Significant NO
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ) (x)
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or
radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) ( ) ) (x)
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ) (x)
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) ) (x)
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments:
a-e) Although this is a corridor previously used by the Pacific Electric Railway, there
is no evidence of discarded drums, containers, discolored soils or hazardous
wastes along the corridor. There was no indication of underground storage
tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. The proposed project will not pose a
health hazard or increase the risk of exposure to a potential health hazard to the
community along the Trail corridor.
The site of the Etiwanda Station is currently used for storage of wood building
materials. Depending on the types and age of materials currently stored on site,
there may be some hazardous materials. A Phase I Site Assessment should be
conducted on this site.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sight Incor~3omtedMi~ga~°n Significant No
10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
.Comments:
a/b) The planned Trail Master Plan includes the 'rail trail' concept, which calls for the
preservation of a 45-foot corridor within the right-of-way for potential future
transit use and the integration of existing transportation infrastructure including
links to rail, bus, multi-modal stations, and local and regional bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. However, the current proposal includes only the Class I
multi-purpose trail for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian uses and the
acquisition of the Etiwanda Station and potential acquisition of the Casa de
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 18
Cucamonga. Therefore the noise impact on the residential land uses adjacent
to the corridor would primarily be limited to the construction of the trail. The
City's Noise Standards will be applied to the project which limit construction
activities to 7:00 a.m, to 8:00 p,m,
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ Incorporat~lMttiga~ Significant No
11. PUBLIC SERVICES, Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) (x)
c) Schools? ( ) ( ) (x)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including () (x) ( )
roads?
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a-c/e) The proposed Trail will require a limited degree of 'nonitoring by the Police
Department to ensure that there is minimal destruction of public or private
property or public nuisance. The City would use existing bicycle or equestrian
patrols along the Trail route. The proposed Trail would have no impact to Fire
protection services, schools or other governmental services.
d) The City of Rancho Cucamonga would be responsible for maintenance of the
'seven-mile Trial segment within the City limits. This additional maintenance
would incrementally add to responsibilities of the Landscape Maintenance
Districts and the financial obligations of the City but is not anticipated to be a
significant amount.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (x) ( )
b) Communication systems? (x)
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution (x)
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (x)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 19
Pot~tlaJ]y
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~.ot~y Mifigatio[t S~gnlflc~l~t No
i~ ,~ ,~ ,~c~
f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Comments:
a-g) The proposed Trail improvements will require water for landscaping purposes
and potentially restmotn or drinking fountains (water for landscape purposes
could include non-potable water if soumes exist in the immediate ama); power
would be required for Iow-level security lighting; and solid waste would be
collected in small receptacles at transfer points and staging points along the
corridor. There would be no significant impact to any public services or utilities
upon implementation of the Master Plan multi-use Trail. Development of the
Etiwanda Station as a museum and Casa de Cucamonga as a future park-n-ride
facility would have minimal impact on public services.
Them are existing underground (i.e. water lines) and overhead (i.e.
telecommunication lines and poles) utility lines that may require relocation within
the corridor during construction of the Trail. The presence of underground
pipelines will be discussed with affected service providers prior to construction.
This is not considered to be an envimnmenta! impact.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sl~ ~o~Ma~ agna~ No
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?. ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
effect?
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
Comments:
a-b) The proposed Trail improvements include greenway landscaping in order to
enhance the corridor through the community and enhance appearance and
'livability'. Landscaping along the Tail will be installed for both aesthetic and
functional reasons, including visual and psychological cooling, wind break,
reduce glare and dust, create nodes and focal points along the Trail, promote
historical and cultural information, and conserve water and energy. The
following Plant Palette is included in the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail
Master Plan.
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 20
Suggested Plant Palette
Scientific Name Common Name
Accent Trees
Ceridium Microphyllum Foothills Palo Verde
Cemis Occidentalis Western Redbud
Geijera Parviflora Australian Willow
Corridor Trees
Platanus Racemosa California Sycamore
Phoenix Dactylifera Date Palm
Cupressus Sempervirens 'Stricta' Italian Cypress
Quemus Agrifolia Coast Live Oak
Ouercus Ilex Holly Oak
Washington Filifera California Fan Palm
Tall shrubs (isolated use only)
Chilopsis Linearis 'Burgundy' Desert Willow
Larrea Tridentata Creosote Bush
Rosemarinus Officinalistuscan Blue Rosemary
Simmondsia Chinesis Jojoba
Salvia Chamaedryoides Sage
Low Shrubs
Artemisia Californica California Sagebrush
Eriogonum Fasciculatem California Buckwheat
Myoporium'Pacificum' Pacific Myoporum
Penisetum Setaceum 'Rubrum' Purple Fountain Grass
Salvia Clevelandii Cleveland Sage
Ground Covers
Archtostaphylos 'Uva-Ursi' Manzanita
Baccharris P. q'win Peaks' Coyote Brush
Convolulus Spp. Bush Morning Glow
Encelia Californica California Encelia
Eschscholzia Californica California Poppy
Lupinus Species Lupine
Vlahonia Repens Oregon Grape
c) Low-level security lighting would be used along the trial in strategic locations
near rest stops, street crossings, trail linkages at neighborhoods, with more
lighting used at transfer points and staging areas. All lighting will be designed in
a manner to avoid intrusion into existing adjacent uses, particularly residential.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S~or~,~-tMitiga#~Si NO
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
b) Disturb archaeological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 21
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: si,~
c) Affect historical or cultural resoumes? ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change · ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
the potential impact area?
Comments:
a-e) The Etiwanda Depot was constructed in 1915 and was one of three that were
built by the Pacific Electric Railway Company to serve the newly completed
Upland to San Bernardino Line, and was identified in the Pacific Electric Inland
Empire Trail Master Plan as an important historic landmark. The structure is an
excellent example of Mission style architecture. It was used by the railroad
beginning in the early 1900's, and is one of the few original stations still
remaining. As the citrus industry declined, so did use of this line. This depot
was closed in 1960 and has since been leased for a lumber supply and sales
yard.
The Depot represents an opportunity to create a museum about the Pacific
Electric Railway and a signature trailhead location. The depot is in the heart of
Etiwanda and is in close proximity to other historic structures. The proposed
project includes the preservation of the rail corridor and the Etiwanda Station.
Proposed improvements to the site include restoration of the depot, street
improvements, parking for approximately 40 vehicles (including vehicles pulling
trailers for equestrian use), landscaping and lighting, and improvements
associated with the trailhead which would include restrooms, picnic tables,
bicycle racks, and an equestrian staging area.
The City is also exploring the use of parking at Casa de Cucamonga (a County
Museum listed in the National Register of Historic Places) as a trail head. The
Casa De' Cucamonga is located on the south side of the Trail, on the east side
of Vineyard/Carnelian. The use of the museum would be a mutually beneficial
relationship because it would promote visitors to the museum as well as the
Trail. The museum site is already fully developed including a large parking lot.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s,~fi~.t M~tlgatJonSIon~ficant NO
mcorpa~t~ ~ct ~ml~act
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 22
Comments:
a/b) Since 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has identified a
planned system of trails to provide a network of interconnecting off-road trails
that are integrated with recreation and open space, both within and beyond the
community border. The hiking/riding trail system is also intended to connect the
residential, commercial and industrial activity centers, as well as the system of
on-street bicycle trails. The regional trails traversing the commercial and
industrial areas of the City also provide a safe and convenient opportunity for
bicycling to work or to shop. The proposed Trail is a Class I multi-use bicycle,
pedestrian, and separated equestrian trail located within the Pacific Electric
Railroad right-of-way which would be an implementation of the recreational
goals of the City General Plan.
Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s?.~.~ Incorl3~atedMifigati°fl Signi~cent No
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) (x) ( )
to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive period of time.
Long-term impacts will endure well into the
futura.)
c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
that are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable futura projects.)
d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga
Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Page 23
Comments:
a-d) This Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail (Trail) is a proposed Class I multi-
purpose trail that follows old Pacific Electric corridor east-west across the City,
connecting to the cities of Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga,
Fontana, and Rialto. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust
to be emitted from grading the trail alignment. Sources of emissions during this
phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and
fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment
traveling over exposed surfaces. Levels of PM~0 will be minimized through the
use of standard construction watering procedures. Any remaining open space
lands are isolated from native habitat and known occurrences of endangered
species, such as kangaroo rat or California gnat-catcher. Due to the level of
development in the surrounding area, and the lack native habitat that could
support endangered species, the impact is considered less than significant. No
major infrastructure will be developed that would be considered growth inducing
within the community.
EARLIER ANALYSES
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in the followingOearlier document(s) pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study
and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500
Civic Center Drive (check all that apply):
(x) General Plan EIR Certified April 6, 1981; and Draft General Plan Update dated
July 2001.
(x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update, SCH
#88020115, certified January 4, 1989; and the Draft EIR for the 2001 General
Plan Update dated July 2001.
(x) Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan dated November 2000; and
Preferred Design Alternative, dated January 1999.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 6-A
Preliminary Environmental Studies (PES) FoYm
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (PES) FORM
Agency (Dist-Co-Rte-Agency): Caltrans District 8. San Bemardino County. Ci_ty of Rancho Cueamon~a
Project Number (Federal Prog. Prefix-Proj.No. (Agrmnt No.):
Project Location: Pacific_ Electric Railway. ri~ht-~,f-wav_ . withln, the cornorate, boundaries of the City_
of Rancho Cucamonga
Project Description: Construct a multi-use bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian trail within the Pacific Electric
right-of-way. Development Of 'the existing Etiwanda Denot as a n/useum and use of the Casa de Cueamonga
site s~ a fi~ture trailhead and parking'lot Pro. iect is seven miles in len~h
EXAMINE FOR POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, AND
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
To Be
A. The Physical Environment Ye._.~s Determined No
1. Is the project a Type I project as definedin 23 CFR 772'5(h);
"construction on new location or the physical alteration of an X
existing highway which significantly changes either the horizontal
or vertical alignment or increases the number of through-traffic
lanes."
2. Are there water resources (rivers, streams, bays, inlets, lakes, X
drainage sloughs) within or immediately adjacent to the project area?
X
3. ls project within a designated sole-source aquifer?
X
4. Is project within the State Coastal Zone?
5. Is the construction area located within a regulatory floodway or within
the base floodplain (100-year) elevation of a water course or lake? X
6. Is the project within or immediately adjacent to a Wild and Scenic X
River System?
7. Is there a potential for a federally-listed, threatened, or endangered
species (including candidate species) or their critical or sensitive X
habitat within the construction area?
8. Is there a potential for wetlands within the construction area? X
X
9. Is there a potential for agricultural wetlands within the construction area?
10. Air Quality
a. Is the project included in a currently conforming regional transportation
plan (RTP) and transportation improvement program (TIP) and that there
have been no substantial changes in the design concept and scope as used X
in the TIP?
b. Is the project exempt from the requirement to determine conformity X
(40 CFR 93.126)?
I I. Is the project in a non-attainment or maintenance area? (National
Ambient Air Quality Standards) ~
Page 6-29
February l, 1998
EXHIBIT 6-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form
To Be
A. The Physical Environment (continued) Yes Determined No
12. ls there a potential for prime or unique farmlands within or
immediately adjacent to the construction area? X
13. ls there a potential for hazardous materials (including underground
tanks) or hazardous material remains within or immediately adjacent
to the comtruction area? X
14. Are there any publicly-owned public parks, recreation areas, or
wildlife or waterfowl refuges [Section 4(0] within construction area? X
15. Are there any aesthetically visual resources within the project area? X
B. The Social and Economic Environment
16. Will the project require any right of way, including partial or X
full takes? Consider construction easements and utility relocations.
17. Is the project inconsistent with plans and goals adopted by the X
.community?
18. Will the project result in the need for public services, including utilities X
other than those presently available or proposed?
19. Will the project involve changes in access control? X
20. Will project involve the use of a temporary road, detour or ramp closure? X
21. Will the project reduce available parking? X
22. Will the project require futur~ construction to fully utilize
the design capabilities included in the proposed project? X
23. Will the project generate public controversy based on potential
environmental effects? X
24. Will project constroction encroach on State or Federal Lands? X
25. Are there National Register listed or potentially aligible historic
properties [Section 106, Section 4(t)] within the construction area? X -
Page 6-30
Februa. 1, 1998 q'7
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 6-A
Preliminary Environmental Studies (PES) Form
DATA AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE CONCLUSIONS OF TH1S CHECKLIST SHOULD BE
ATTACHED OR AVAILABLE FROM THE LOCAL AGENCY UPON REQUEST
(Check to Indicate Required Technical Studies, Coordination, Permits or Approvals)
C. REQUIRED TECHNICAL STUDIES D. COORDINATION E. PERMIT/APPROVALS
[] NOISE STUDY
FHWA
-- Traffic Related --
__ Construction Related
[] WATER QUALITY STUDY
-- Discharge I~xlged/FJll material (US waters) __ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -- Issues Section 404 Permit
__ Construction in Navigable Waters __ U.S. Army Co~ps of Engineers -- Section 10 Permit
__ Const~ction of Bridges/Causeways Across __ U.S. Coast Guard __ Approves Plans
Navigable Waters
Construction of Bridge -- California Regional Water Quality -- Water Quality
-- Control Board Certification
Section 1601/03 Permit
__ Stream or Lake Alteration -- California Department ofFish & Game __
NEPA/404 MOU FHWA
Comaminaron Threat
[] SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER -- EPA (S.F. Regional Office) __
State Coastal Zone Management agency -- Coastal Zone Consistency
[] COASTAL ZONE --
(California Coastal Conunission (CCC))
[] FLOODPLAIN STUDY '* __ Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHWA Floodplain FJndin~
[] WILD & SCENIC RIVERS __ U.S. Department of Interior
-- Heritage Conservation/Recreation
Service
[] BIOLOGY STUDY * __ FHWA -- See 7 Consultation
-- California Department offish & Game -- Incidental Take Permit
FHWA/EPA Wetlands Findings
[] WETI~.NDS STUDY * --
U.S. Fish & Wildlife
-- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -- Verifies jurJs, wetlands
National Marine Fisheries Service
-- Natural Resources Conservation Service __ Verifle~ agsi. wetlands
Agricultural Wetlands __
FHWA __ Conformity Finding
[] AIR QUALITY STUDY* --
Natural Resources Conservation Service __ Verifies ptime~nique
[] FARMLANDS STUDY __
U.S. Ann~' Coq)s of En~Jnee~ Approves Conversions
~] HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STUDY __ 1. CALIF. EPA;
(Cleanup of Hazardous Material Sites) Deparm~nt of Toxic Substances Conrail,
Biennial Reports, Lis~s of Active Annual
· ' Workplan Sites
-- 2. CALIF. OPR; Hazardous Wastes &
Substances Sites List, List of Contamina
Sites
.aX 3. LOCAL; Health & Human Services
Dept., Hazardous Waste Operations
Division
* FHWA has responsibility for consultation under regulation or interagency agreement or FHWA has responsibility for a
finding or determination required by law, regulation or Executive Order.
Page 6-31
February 1, 1998 q ~
EXHIBIT 6-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form
C. REQUIRED TECHI~ICAL STUDIES D. COORDINATION E. PERMIT/APPROVALS
[] SECTION 4(0 EVALUATION ** __ FHWA __ Makes Determination
Public Official w/Jurisdictional
Responsibility.
-- SHPO/ACHP (as appropriate)
__ DOI/DOAfHUD/USDA (as appropriate)
[] SECTION 6{f) EVALUATION __ Park Official
DOI
[] VISUAL IMPACT STUDY (AESTHETICS) __ FHWA
[] RELOCATION IMPACTS STUDY __ State & Local Planning Dopartments
[] SOC10-ECONOMIC STUDY __ Airportsl Schools, State and Local
. Planning Departments
[] Tio. mc _ F WA
[] SECTION 106 STUDY"
_~APE Map X-- Caltrans ~' DetenMnes applicability
of Minimal APE
FHWA __ Approves APE
__ SHPO/ACHP (as appropriate)
Local preservation groups and/or Native
American Tribes
__ Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) -- FI-P,VA __ Concurs or Consults with
SHPO/ACHP
[] CONSTRUCTION/ENCROACH ON STATE
LANDS
__ Under State Lands Commission Jurisdiction __ Slate Lands Commission __ Oeneral Permit/Revise
General Plans
-- Under Caltmns hu~sdicfion __ Caltrans __ Encroachmem Permit
[] CONSTRUCTION/ENCROACHMENT __ U.S. BureauofReclamation __ EneroachmentPermit
ON FEDERAL LANDS __ Private Land Owner __ Right of Enh3t Permit
Additional studies may be required for other Federal Agencies.
F. Public Hearing and Public Availability
X Not Required Oppoaunity for a Public Hearing
Notices of Availability Public Heating Required
Environmental Document ONLY
G. Preliminary Environmental Document Classification (NEPA)
Based on the evaluation of the project, the environmental document to be developed should be:
Environmental Impact Statement
Environmental Assessment
Categorical Exclusion, with required technical studies (involving Federal action)
-. Programmatic Categotieal Exclusion, without required technical studies
X Programmatic Categorical Exclusion, with required technical studies (not involving Federal action)
* FHWA has responsibility for consultation under regulation or interageocy a~'eement or FHWA has responsibility for a
finding or determination required by law, regulation or Executive Order.
Page 6-32 q~
February 1, 1998 '
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 6-A
Preliminary Environmental Studies (PES) Form
Prepared by: Nancy Ferguson, Lilburn Corp. Date9/26/01 Telephone#:(qOq) 890-1818
This document was prepared under my supervision, in accordance with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual, Exhibit 6-
B, "Instructions for Comttl~ting the Preliminary Environmental Study Form."
Signature local agency:L~~ Date: /0 ''/''OI Telephone # :/'~t~/~ 7'/'"~ Z,~O
I have reviewed this Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form and determined that the submittal is complete and
sufficient. I concur with the studies to be performed and the recommended level of environmental document (if required).
Signature DLAE: Date:. Telephone #:
THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED FOR EAs, EISs, REGULAR CEs, AND OVHEN
REQUESTED) FOR PROGRAMMATIC CEs:
I have reviewed this Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form and determined that the submittal is complete and
sufficient. I concur with the studies to be performed and the recommended level of environmental document.
Signature District Environmental: Date: Telephone #:.
FHWA REVIEW of PES RECOMMENDED YES [] NO []
THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED FOR EAs, EISs, AND (WHEN REQUESTED) FOR
REGULAR CEs:
H. I concur with the studies to be performed and the recommended level of environmental document.
Signature FHWA: Date: Telephone #:
Distribution:
Original: District Local Assistance Engineer
Copy: Local Agency Project Files
Page 6.-33
February 1, 1998
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
A. The Physical Environment
1) Is the project a Type I project as defined in 23 CFR 772.5(h)?
No. The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail - Rancho Cucamonga section does not alter any
existing highways as defined in 23 CFG 772.5(h). The proposed project is the construction of a
multi-purpose trail along an abandoned railroad right-of-way.
2) Are there water resources within or immediately adjacent to the project area?
No. The proposed trail corridor, Etiwanda Station and Casa de Cucamonga are not located near
any water resources.
3) Is the project within a designated sole-source aquifer?
No. The proposed trail will be located within railroad right-of-way and does not fall within a sole
source aquifer.
4) Is the project within the State Coastal Zone?
No. The project site is located in San Bcrnardino County approximately 60 miles east of the
Pacific Ocean.
5) Is the construction area located within a regulatory floodway?
Yes. The Trail passes through segments of the 100-year flood zone in the following locations:
near the intersection of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue and along Grove Avenue; along Foothill
Boulevard at the base of Red Hill; and at Haven Avenue. Since there will be no habitable
structures, and the Trail is intended for pedestrian, bicycle and equeslrian usage only, no
motorized vehicles or heavy equipment, Trail development within the Flood zone would not
result in a public safety hazard.
6) Is the project within or immediately adjacent to a Wild and Scenic River System?
No. The proposed trail follows the former Pacific Electric Rail Road alignment. The major
creeks in the area are ephemeral and have been improved with concrete linings. The Trail crosses
these channels via bridges.
7) Is there a potential for a federally-listed, threatened, or endangered species?
No. The Trail is a clearly defined corridor vegetated with non-native and/or ruderal species. The
Trail improvements will be constructed along the outside 15 to 20 feet of both sides of the
corridor, with a 45 foot space in the center to be landscaped and reserved for potential future
transit use (not reasonably foreseeable and not a part of this project). The area around the
existing Etiwanda Station is currently used as a building materials storage yard with no open
space for vegetative growth.
8) Is there a potential of wetlands within the construction area?
No. There are no wetlands (marshes, vernal pools, etc.) in the project vicinity. The only riparian
areas in the City are along the non-channelized portions of the major creeks, which are typically
2.5 miles northerly of the Trail.
9) Is there a potential for agricultural wetlands within the construction area?
No. The site is not considered farmland pursuant to Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
of the California Resources Agency. There are no wetlands in the project vicinity.
10) Air Quality
a) Is the project included in a currently conforming regional transportation
plan (RTP)?
Yes. The proposed multi-use trail is included in the San Bernardino Associated
Government (SANBAG) Non-motorized Transportation Plan.
b) Is the project exempt from the requirement to determine conformity?
Yes. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities are exempted from the requirement to
determine conformity under 40 CFR, Chapter I, Part 93.126.
11) Is the project in a non-attainment or maintenance area?
Yes. The project site is within a maintenance area according to National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
12) Is there a potential for prime or unique farmlands within the construction area?
No. The project site is an ex/sting, abandoned railroad right-of-way and is not considered
farmland pursuant to Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of California Resources
Agency.
13) Is there a potential for Itazardous Materials within the construction area?
An environmental site assessment (ESA) was conducted for the Melxopolitan Transportation
Agency (MTA) prior to purchasing the property. The ESA identified area where clean up would
be required. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to remodel and upgrade the grounds
of the Etiwanda to turn it into a museum, related to the history of the Pacific Electric Railway.
Prior to any disturbance of the building or site, the City will have the property assessed to
determine if any hazardous materials are present. Appropriate cleanup of the site and building
will be undertaken prior to occupancy.
14) Is there any publicly-owned park, or recreation areas within the construction area?
No. Project site is a former railroad route that has been abandoned. There are no parks or
recreation areas currently associated with the right-of-way.
15) Is there any aesthetically visual resources within the project area?
No. The project site is a linear right-of-way that passes through the City. The area has views of
the San Gabriel Mountains which will not be affected by the project.
B) The Social and Economic Environment
16) Will the project require any right of way?
No. The right-of-way for the project has been secured by SANBAG.
17) Is the project inconsistent with plans and goals adopted by the community.
No. The project is included in the City's General Plan.
18) Will the project be in need of public services other than those presently proposed?
No. Public services and utilities are available.
19) Will the project involve changes in access control?
Yes. The ultimate design of the Trial includes a hierarchy of street crossings to control access
based upon traffic volume and speed. The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail will have a total
of 18 crossings over its 7 mile length in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Grade separations will
be provided at Foothill Boulevard, Carnelian Avenue, Victoria Park Lane, and 1-15 Freeway (all
have existing bridges). The majority of access control will be signalized, which includes: Grove
Avenue, Baseline Road, Archibald Avenue, Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue,
Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, Efiwanda Avenue, and East Avenue. The remaining
lower volume streets will utilize flashing beacons for traffic control, including Hellman Avenue,
Amethyst Street, Ramona Avenue, and Kenyon Way.
20) Will the project involve the use of a temporary road, detour or ramp closure?
No. The proposed project will be developed on an existing railroad right-of-way.
21) Will the project reduce available parking?
No. The trail master plan includes future transit links and staging areas so no parking will be
affected.
22) Will the project require future construction to fully utilize the design capabilities
included in the proposed project?
No. The project will be designed for full utilization of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian
facilities.
23) Will the project generate public controversy based on potential environmental
effects?
No. The proposed trail would use an abandoned railroad right-of-way. During preparation of the
Trail Master Plan, there was an extensive public outreach program that included public
workshops on June 8 and July 20, 2000. In addition, survey forms were distributed throughout
the Master Plan study area and posted on the Trail's website. Over 500 responses were received,
all in support of the Trial, and no enviromental issues were raised.
24) Will project construction encroach on State or Federal Lands?
No. The length of the project falls within the railroad right-of-way.
25) Is there National Register listed or potentially eligible historic properties within the
construction area?
Yes. Casa de Cucamonga is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP-L-73-428).
Use of the site's existing parking lot as a trailhead by trail users is likely to increase awareness
of, and visitors to, this important historic museum. The proposed use will not affect the integrity
of the historic building or grounds.
TH CITY OF
~AN C 0 CU CAM ON C.A
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE
OF POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE
CITIES OF CLAREMONT, FONTANA, LA VERNE, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO,
AND UPLAND THAT FORMED THE CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY FOR THE
ROUTE 30 FREEWAY CORRIDOR BE'IRNEEN LA VERNE AND SAN
BERNARDINO, ADDING MONTCLAIR AS A MEMBER OF THE AUTHORITY AND
ADDING THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL AS A PROJECT OF
THE AUTHORITY.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council review the proposed Amendment to the Joint Exemise of Authority Agreement
(JPA), and adopt the attached Resolution approving the amendment which the Mayor would then
sign on behalf of the City Council.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS
The cities along the Route 30 Corridor have been meeting since 1992 to coordinate the design and
construction of the Route 30 Freeway between the cities of La Veme and San Bemardino. In 1994,
the cities formalized this working relationship by establishing a joint exercise of powers agreement
(JPA). The City of Rancho Cucamonga has continued hosting the quarterly JPA meetings. At their
October 9, 2001 meeting, the JPA cities approved the proposed amendment as described above.
In 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, joined together with the San
Bemardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and surrounding cities, to develop a multi-purpose
trail that would link the cities of La Verne, Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Rancho Cucamonga,
Fontana and Rialto. The City Council approved the Master Plan for the Pacific Electric Inland
Empire Trail on December 6, 2000. The rail trail would also connect to the 6.9-mile Citrus Regional
Bikeway rail trail project being planned from Claremont to San Dimas.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
October 17, 2001
Page 2
The Route 30 Corridor Design Authority includes the cities along the Pacific Electdc Inland Empire
Trail. Dudng the preparation of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Master Plan, SANBAG
indicated that it would be advantageous if the cities formed a joint exercise of powers agreement to
collectively work toward implementation of the rail trail project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga
proposed to the Route 30 Corridor Design Authority that they amend the JPA to take on this rail trail
project. The purpose of the JPA amendment will be to establish design, seek funding, construct,
and maintain the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail.
At the present time, the addition of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail to the JPA will not result in
any direct costs to the City. As agreed to by all the cities, this JPA does not include any provisions
for bonding assessments or similar revenue generators.
Respectfully submitted,
,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:DC/Is
Attachments: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT FOR THE CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized under the Joint Exercise of
Powers Law, Government Code Section 6500 et.seq, to join in the formation of a joint powers
authority; and
WHEREAS, in 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga became a member of the Route 30
Corridor Design Authority; and
WHEREAS, in 1999 the City of Rancho Cucamonga joined with other cities in a cooperative
effort to prepare a master plan for a multi-purpose trail along the former Pacific Electric Railway
corridor, which runs through the cities of La Veme, Claremont, Montclair, Upland, Rancho
Cucamonga, Fontana, and Rialto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a cooperative effort for a consolidated program of
design, construction, and maintenance of the Pacific Electdc Inland Empire Trail can be of benefit to
the people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed the
proposed amendment attached to this Resolution and approves said amendment.
Section 2. That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take effect and be in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed
and attested by their proper officers duly authorized and their official seals to be hereto affixed, on
the day and year set opposite the name of each of the parties.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2001
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
/07
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT FOR THE CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY
This First Amendment ("Amendment") is made this __ day of ,2001, by and
between the cities of Claremont, Fontana, La Veme, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland,
(collectively, the "Original Agencies") and the City of Montclair, all of which are municipal
corporations duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and is an
amendment to that Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement ("Agreement") made and entered into
the 19t~ day of January, 1994 by and between the Original Agencies in connection with the
establishment of the Corridor Design Authority.
RECITALS
A. On January 19, 1994, the Original Agencies formed the Corridor Design
Authority for the purpose of administering a consolidated program of design and maintenance
along the Route 30 Freeway Corridor within the boundaries of the Original Agencies.
B. The Original Agencies now desire to augment the purposes of the Corridor
Design Joint Powers Authority to include a program to design, construct and maintain the Pacific
Electric Inland Empire/Citras Trail, a regional commuter bikeway project, in accordance with
master plans prepared for that Trail within the cities of Claremont, La Veme, Montclalr, Rancho
Cucamonga and Upland.
C. To facilitate coordination with the City of Montclair on the project for the Pacific
Eleclxic Inland Empire/Citrus Trail, the Original Agencies desire to add the City of Muntclalr as
a member of the Corridor Design Authority.
D. On ,2001, the Board of Directors of the Authority, voted to
authorize the City of Montclair to become an additional member agency to the Corridor Design
Authority and directed that this Amendment be presented to each Original Agency and to the
City of Montclalr for their approval.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual interests of the parties and the
promises contained herein, the Original Agencies and the City of Montclalr hereby agree as
follows:
Section 1. Section 1.01 (Definitions) of Article I of the Agreement is amended to add a
new definition for the term "Agencies" to be inserted in alphabetical order into that Section to
read as follows:
"Agencies" means the cities of Claremont, Fontana, La Veme, Rancho
Cucamonga, Rialto and Upland (sometimes referred to as the "Original
Agencies") and the City of Montclalr, all of which are municipal corporations
duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California."
11231\0001\660735,1 Page 1 of 5
Section 2. Section 2.01 (Purpose) of the Agreement is amended'to read as follows:
"Section 2.01. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the joint
exercise of powers common to the Agencies to establish a coordinated program to
design, construct and maintain the Route 30 Freeway Corridor and the Pacific
Electric Inland Empire/Citrus Trail, a multi-purpose trail within a linear park,
including, but not limited to, the acquisition of funds to the Agencies through
grants, ISTEA, TEA-21, or any other monies available to provide for these public
improvements."
Section 3. Section 2.03 (Board of Directors) is hereby amended to increase the number
of Board Members fi:om 12 to 14 to accommodate the inclusion of representatives from the City
of Montclair.
Section 4. Section 8.01 (Notices) of Article vm is hereby amended to add the City of
Montclair to the list of agencies to receive notices under this Agreement as follows:
"CITY OF MONTCLAIR
City Clerk
5111 Benito Street
M0ntclair, California 91763
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. This Amendment may be signed by the parties in counterparts, and upon the
approval and signature of a majority of the Original Agencies and the City of Montclair, this
Amendment shall take effect. The Secretmy of the Authority shall thereupon enter that effective
date of this Amendment in the introductory paragraph of this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to the
Agreement to be executed and attested to by their duly authorized officers on the day and year
set forth below the name of each of the parties.
CITY OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA
By:.
Title:
Date:
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
City Clerk
11231\0001\660735.1 Page 2 of 5
~ he c if¥ of
Rancho Cucamonga
Staff Report
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chairman and Members of Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director
BY: Flavio H. Nunez, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION CONSENTiNG TO A JOiNT PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AMENDMENT NO.
3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council and Redevelopment Agency adopt the attached Resolution consenting to a
Joint Public Hearing on December 5, 2001 for Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment Plan
and the Negative Declaration for the Rancho Redevelopment Project.
BACKGROUND
The Agency has previously directed an Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan be prepared
in order to reinstate eminent domain authority on a site that is currently developed as a
Costco store on the south side of Foothill Boulevard and east of the I-15 Freeway (Foothill
Market Place Center). Before the Redevelopment Agency can consider approval of the
Redevelopment Plan and Negative Declaration for Amendment No. 3 to the Rancho
Redevelopment Project, the Agency Board and City Council must jointly conduct a public
hearing on the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 33458 of the Health and Safety Code.
ANALYSIS
The Resolution being considered establishes the intent of the City Council and
Redevelopment Agency to hold a joint public hearing in order to consider Amendment No. 3
to the Redevelopment Plan. A notice of the public hearing must be published in a newspaper
of general circulation and a copy of the notice is required to be mailed, by first-class mail, to
//0
the last known property owner of each parcel of land in the Project Area. Additionally, the
notice is required to be mailed to all residents and businesses within the Project Area by first-
class mail and to the governing body of each taxing agency by certified mail.
Through the adoption of the attached Resolution, the City Council and Redevelopment
Agency will establish the time, date and place of the joint public hearing on the proposed
amendment as follows:
Date: December 5, 2001
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Council Chamber
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Director
rda\fnunez\plan amendment no.3\srl01701.setpublicmeeting.agency.doc
-2-
III
RESOLUTION NO...__~! - ,~ 5Z'//'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CONSENTING TO A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT
TO AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has initiated
proceedings for the adoption of Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho
Redevelopment Project (the "Amendment No. 3"); and
WHEREAS, according to Section 33458 of the Health and Safety Code, the City Council shall
consider at a public hearing Amendment No. 3 submitted by the Agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION '1: The City Council hereby consents to a Joint Public Hearing with the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency on the proposed Amendment No. 3 and the Negative
Declaration at the following time and place:
Date: December 5, 2001
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Council Chambers
SECTION 2: The City Clerk, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Agency, is authorized
and directed to give notice of such public hearing in the form and manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2001.
Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
117-
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill
DATE~ October 17, 2001
SUBJECT: Approval for the Application of Funds for the Regina Winery Museum
Project from the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museums and
Facilities for Wildlife Education or Environmental Education Program
under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal
Protection Bond Act of 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council approve the attached Resolution in support of the City's application for
grant funds from the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museums and Facilities for
Wildlife Education or Environmental Education Program under the Safe Neighborhood
Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Through the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water and Clean Air and Coastal Protection
Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12) which was passed by the California voters in March
2000, $8,000,000 in State funding is available through a competitive grant process for the
development or rehabilitation of real property consisting of urban recreational and cultural
centers, museums and facilities for wildlife education or environmental education.
In the hopes of attaining $500,000 in funding for the development of the Historical Regina
Winery Museum, the City has assembled an interdepartmental team from the Engineering
and Planning Divisions and the Community Services Department to develop a grant
application. The grant application will focus on the development of the Museum and the
opportunity it will afford our community and the region to learn about the rich legacy and
winemaking history of our area.
113
CiTY COUNCIL
RF$OLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR REGINA WINERY MUSEUM
OCTOBER 17, 2001
The first step in the process for securing funding was the development of a concept paper
that was submitted in May 2001, to the Honorable Bill Leonard for his review and
recommendation, in June 2001, the Assemblyman nominated our project for further
consideration in the competitive process.
In order to proceed with the competitive grant funding process, the attached Resolution
needs to be approved by City Council and forwarded by November 1, 2001, along with our
application to the California Department of Parks and Recreation.
~e-~~d~'( es Dire ctor
Attachment
I :~COMMSERV~Gouncil&Boards~GityCouncil~StalfRepo~t$ t2001 ~ResoultionRegina WineryRe$oultion 10.17. 01. doc
-2-
/17'
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR URBAN RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL
CENTERS, MUSEUMS AND FACILITIES FOR WILDLIFE EDUCATION
OR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND
COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000
For: Historical Regina Winery Museum
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Urban
Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museums and Facilities for Wildlife
Education or Environmental Education Program which provides funds to the
State of California for Grants to cities, counties, nonprofit organizations and
federally recognized California Indian Tribes; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been
delegated the responsibility for the administration of the Program within the state
and grant Project shown above, setting up necessary procedures; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of
Parks and Recreation require the Applicant's Governing Body to certify by
resolution the approval of the application before submission of said application to
the State; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of
California for the Project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California
1. Approves the filing of an application for local assistance
funds from the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers,
Museums and Facilities for Wildlife or Environmental
Education Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood
Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection
Bond Act of 2000; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to
operate and maintain the Project; and
I/5
3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and
agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract
shown in the Procedural Guide; and
4. Appoints the Community Services Director as agent to
conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents
including, but not limited to applications, agreements,
payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for
the completion of the aforementioned Project.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2001.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of
October 2001.
Executed this 17th day of October 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
I:lCOMMSERV~Council&BoardslCityCouncil~StaffRepo~ts[2001 iRegina WineryMuseurnResolution 10.17.01. doc
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DE PART~IE NT
StaffR port
DA'11~: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer(~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ,~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,381.67 ($113,983.34 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, R.J. NOBLE COMPANY,
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MARINE AVENUE (HUMBOLDT AVE. TO
26TM ST.) AND 26TM STREET (CENTER AVE. TO HAVEN AVE.) PAVEMENT
,REHABILITATION, TO BE FUNDED FROM AB2928 TRAFFIC CONGESTION
RELIEF FUND 182, ACCOUNT NO. 11823035650/1256182-0 AND ACCOUNT NO.
11823035650/1325182-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $125,381.67 ($113,983.34 plus 10% contingency) to the
apparent Iow bidder, R.J. Noble Company, for the construction of the Marine Avenue (Humboldt
Ave. to 26th St.) and 26~h Street (Center Ave. to Haven Ave.) Pavement Rehabilitation, to be funded
from AB2928 Traffic Congestion Relief Fund 182, Account No. 11823035650/1256182-0 and
Account No. 11823035650/1325182-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 25, 2001, for
the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $133,504.50. Staff has reviewed all bids received
and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities
to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Res ectfullysubmitted, ,
Ci~ Engineer
BID SUMMARy FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 APPARENTLOWBIDDER
Marine Avenue (Humboldt Avenue to 26th Street) and 26th Street ENGINEERS COST
'Center Avenue to Haven Avenue) Pavement Rehabilitation ESTIMATE R.J. Noble Company Vance Corporation Premier Contractors
UNITI UNIT UNIT UNITI
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Cleahng and Grubbing~ inc. sawcut and removal ol $18~000.00 $18~000.0C $3~400.00 $3~400.00 $11,200.00 $11~200.00 $3~060.63 $3~060.63
2. 884 CY Unclassified Excavation inc. fill and misc. grading $18.00 $15~912.0£ $12.00 $10~608.00 $12.00 $10~608.00 $27.43 $24~248.12
3. 672 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM)~ inc. pavemant' $80.00 $53~760.0£ $78.301 $52~617.60 $80.00 $53~760.00 $82.58 $55~493.76
4. 2283 SY ColdPlane (Variable 0.12'-0') $2.50 $5~707.50~ $3.03 $6~917.49 $1.50 $3~424.50 $2.45 $5~593.3~
5. 310 TONS Asphalt Concrete inc. Pavement Preparation $50.00 $15,500.00 $81.00 $25,110.00 $43.00 $13,330.0(3 $59.51 $18~448.10
6. 395 TONS ErushedAggregatcBase $35.00 $13~825.00 $20.35 $8~038.25 $28.001 $11~060.0(3 $18.361 $7~252.20
7. 2 EA Adiust to Grade (Manhnle) $300.00 $600.00 $324.00 $648.00 $320.00 $640.0(3 $367.28] $734.56
8. 3 EA Adiust to Grade (Water Valver Clean out and Wat~ $200.00 $600.00 $324.00 $972.00 $320.00 $960.0(3 $367.28 $1,101.84
9. 3 EA Adiust Survey Monuments $200.00 $600.00 $324.00 $972.0(3 $320.00 $960.0(3 $122.43 $367.29
10. 1 LS Striping and Pavement Markings $3~000.00! $3~000.00 $1~450.00 $1~450.0(3 $17900.00 $1~900.0C $1~652.74 $1~652.74
11. 1 LS traffic Control $6,000.001 $6~000.00 $3~250.00[ $3,250.0(3 $7~200.00 $7~200.0C $1~836.381 $1~836.38
TOTAL ] $133~504.50 I $113~983.34 ]51157042.5£I $119~788.97
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
Marine Avenue (Humbolt Avenue to 26th Street) and 26th Street Holland-Lowe Laird Construction Co.,
Center Avenue to Haven Avenue) Pavement Rehabilitation Construction, Inc. : All American Asphalt Inc. Silvia Construction
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
lqO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Elearmg and Grubbing~inc. sawcut andremoval o $10~500.0(3 $10,500.00 $15~231.60 $15~231.60 $12,500.001 $12~500.00 $16~000.00 $16,000.00
2. 884 CY Unclassified Excavation inc. fill andmisc, grading $27.5(3 $24~310.00 $23.00 $20~332.00 $25.001 $22~100.00 $22.80 $20~155.20:
3. 672 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM)~inc. pavement $73.0(3 $49~056.00 $60.00 $40~320.00 $75.001 $50~400.00 $71.00 $47~712.00'
4. 2283 SY Eold Plane (Variable 0.1T-0') $1.9(3 $4~337.70 $1.80 $4,109.40 $3.251 $7~419.75 $3.10 $7~077.30
5. 310 TONS Asphalt Concrete inc. Pavement Preparation $43.25 $137407.50 $45.00 $13~950.00 $40.00 $12~400.00 $68.75 $21~312.50
6. 395 TONS Erushed Aggregate Base $25.4(3 $10,033.00 $35.00 $13~825.00 $25.00 $9~875.00 $27.50 $10~862.50
7. 2 EA Adiust to Grade (Manhole) $330.001 $660.00 $450.00 $900.00 $425.00 $850.00 $315.00 $630.00
8. 3 EA Adiust to Grade (Water Valve~ Clean out and War* $260.00 $780.00 $260.00 $780.00 $375.00 $17125.00 $315.00 $945.00
9. 3 EA Adiust Survey Monuments $770.00 $2,310.00 $260.00 $780.00 $375.00 $1,125.00 $315.00 $945.00
10. 1 LS Striping and Pavement Markings $L470.00 $17470.00 $2~901.00 $27901.00 ' $17750.00 $1~750.00 $2~000.00 $2~000.00
11. 1 LS l'raffic Control $3~080.00 $3~080.00 $16~000.00 $16~000.00 $9~955.25 $9~955.25 $6~000.0(3 $6,000.00
TOTAL $119,944.20 $129,129.00 $129,500.00 $133~639.50
~ Page 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
Marine Avenue (Humboldt Avenue to 26th Street) and 26th Street
Center Avenue to Haven Avenue) Pavement Rehabilitation Gentry Brothers~ Inc. E.G.N. Construction~ Inc.
UNIT UNIT I BID CORRECTED
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COSTI AMOUNT AMOUNT
I. 1 LS Clearing and Gmbbmg~ inc. sawcut and removal o $36~000.00 $36~000.00 $13~175.00 $13~175.00 $13,175.00
2. 884 CY Unclassified Excavation inc. fill and misc. grading $25.00 $22; 100.00 $33.85 $29,923.40 $29~923.40
3. 672 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM)~ inc. pavement $75.00 $50~400.00 $98.00 $65~856.00 $65,856.00
4. 2283 SY Cold Plane (Variable 0.12'-0') $2.00 $4~566.00 $2.75 $6,278.25 $6~278.25
5. 310 TONS Asphalt Concrete inc. Pavement Preparation $45.00 $13;950.00 $46.00 $14~260.00 $14~260.00
6. 395 TONS CmshedA~gregateBase $25.00 $9~875.00 $23.00 $9,085.00 $9~085.00
7. 2 EA Adiust to Grade (Manhole) $300.00 $600.00 $400.00 $800.00 $800.00
8. 3 EA Adiust to Grade (Water Valve~ Clean out and Wat~ $25.00 $75.00 $300.00 $900.00 $900.00
9. 3 EA Adiust Survey Monuments $100.00 $300.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 $1 ~200.00
10. 1 LS Striping and Pavement Markings $1,600.00 $l~600.00 $17700.00 $ I~700.00 $1~700.00
11. 1 LS Traffic Control $2~000.00 $2~000.00 $1~500.00 $I~500.00 $1~500.00
TOTAL $1411466.00 $144,677.701 $144~677.65
Page 2
R A N C H O C U C ^ M O N G A
ENGINEERING DE PART~IE NT
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techmc~a~'' n ~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $609,709.10 ($554,281.00 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, HERMAN WEISSKER, INC.,
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1
UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS FROM 4TM
STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET, TO BE
FUNDED FROM RDA FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 26408015602
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $609,709.10 ($554,281.00 plus 10% contingency) to
the apparent Iow bidder, Herman Weissker, Inc., for the construction of the Lower Hermosa
Avenue Phase I Utility Underground and Street Light Improvements from 4th Street to
Approximately 350 Feet South of 8t~ Street, to be funded from RDA funds, Account No.
26408015602.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on October 2, 2001, for
the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $699,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids
received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any
irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation
and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Res~eet~ully submitted,.
Willia_~l' J. O'Nei~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachment
121
24TH 5T
6TH ST NTS
GTH ~T
4TH ST
P ROJ I~ CT ONTARIO CITY LIMIT
LOCATION
~,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~
LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1
UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS
4TH STREET TO 350' S/0 8TH STREET
VICINITY MAP 122_.
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING OCTOBER 2, 2001 APPARENT LOIF BIDDER
LOWER HERMOSA PHASE I UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT ENGINEERS COST
IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE Herman Weissker, Inc. l~amh¢o En~ ineering, Inc,
UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNIT i DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. I LS Mobilization $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $12,336.0G $12,336.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.0C
Joint trench, includes excavation for laterals, sweeps and appurtenant
2. LS structures, and including sawcutting, removals, shoring and bracing, $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $123,799.0G $123,799.00 $370,000.00 $370,000.00
~rotection and support of existing facilities, backfill, restoration and
trench repair
Installation of SCE underground utility conduit and street light conduit.
3. LS ,ullboxes and appurtenant structures, including all material per SCE $225,000.00 $225,000.00 $205,420.00 $205,420.00 $172,000.00 $172,000.00,
4. LS Installation of Verizon underground utility conduit, pullboxes and
,appurtenant structures, including all material, per Verizon plan $150,000.00 $150,000.0C $175,874.00 $175,874.00 $115,000.00 $115,000.00
Installation of Charter Communication underground utility conduit,
5. 1 LS pullboxes and appurtenant structures, per Charter Communication $60,000.00 $60,000.0C $16,348.00 $16,348.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00
plan. Note: Materials to be supplied by Charter
6. 1 LS Replace damaged traffic striping and markings $1,500.00 $1,500.0C $3,768.00 $3,768.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Replace damaged traffic signal inductive loops (6th and Hermosa
7 I LS intersection) $2,500.00 $2,500.0C $3,295.00 $3,295.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
8. 1 LS Traffic Control $5,000.00 $5,000.0C $13,441.00 $13,441.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00
TOTAL $699,000.00 $554,281.00 $690,300.00
~.~ Sheet 1
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING OCTOBER 2, 2001
LOWER HERMOSA PHASE I UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT
IMPROVEMENTS HCI, Inc. Golden State Utility Co. Vido Snmarzieh, Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1 I LS Mobilization $5,500.0( $5,500.01] $78,500.00 $78,500.0C $25,000.00 $25,000.06
Joint trench, includes excavation for laterals, sweeps and appurtenant
2 LS structures, and including sawcutting, removals, shoring and bracing,
xotection and support of existing facilities, backfill, restoration and $400,479.0C $400,479.00 $205,665.00 $205,665.0C $50,000.00 $50,000.00
trench repair
Installation of SCE underground utility conduit and street light conduit
3. 1 LS ~ullboxes and appurtenant structures, including all material per SCE $165,745.01] $165,745.00 $295,741.0£ $295,741.01] $350,000.00 $350,000.00
4. 1 LS Installation of Verizon underground utility conduit, pullboxes and
appurtenantstmctures, including all material, per Verizon plan $124,120.01] $124,120.00 $178,569.0C $178,569.01] $225,000.00 $225,000.00
Installation of Charter Communication underground utility conduit,
5. I LS mllboxes and appurtenant sm~ctures, per Charter Communication $15,658.00 $15,658.00 $21,305.013 $21,305.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00
dan. Note: Materials to be supplied by Charter
6. 1: LS Replace damaged traffic striping and markings $500.00 $500.00 $2,600.0(] $2,600.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Replace damaged lxaffic signal inductive loops (6th and Hermosa
7. LS intersection) $2,950.00 $2,950.0( $1,000.01] $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
8 LS traffic Control $18,500.00 $18,500.0( $1,500.012 $1,500.013 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
TOTAL $733,452.01] $784,880.00 $796,000.00
· M~ Sheet 2
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING OCTOBER 2, 2001
LOWER HERMOSA PHASE I UTILITY UNDERGROUND AND STREET LIGHT
IMPROVEMENTS VCI Telecom, Inc. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. Mueller Pi ~eliners, Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. I LS Mobilization $5,000.00 $5,000.0( $26,511.0(~ $26,511.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0~
loint trench, includes excavation for laterals, sweeps and appurtenant
2. 1 LS structures, and including sawcut~ing, removals, shoring and bracing,
~rotection and support of existing facilities, backfill, restoration and $375,200.00 $375,200.0( $275,336.00 $275,336.00 $612,952.00 $612,952.00
t~ench repair
Installation of SCE underground utility conduit and street light conduit,
3. LS ,ullboxes and appurtenant structures, including all material per SCE $209,248.00 $209,248.0( $338,829.0(} $338,829.00 $179,351.00 $179,351.00
~lan
4. LS Installation of Verizon underground utility conduit, pullboxes and $129,687.00 $129,687.0( $177,705.0(} $177,705.00 $143,359.00 $143,359.00
appurtenant structures, including all material, per Verizon plan
Installation of Charter Communication underground utility conduit,
5. LS pullboxes and appurtenant structures, per Charter Communication $59,813.00 $59,813.0( $26,863.0(} $26,863.00 $41,979.00 $41,979.00
plan. Note: Materials to be supplied by Charter
6. LS Replace damaged traffic striping and markings $3,000.00 $3,000.0( $2,480.0(} $2,480.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
~,eplace damaged traffic signal inductive loops (6th and Hermosa
7. LS intersection) $3,000.00 $3,000.0( $4,590.00 $4,590.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00
8. LS Traffic Control $20,000.00 $20,000.0( $3,620.0C $3,620.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0(}
TOTAL $004,948.00 $855,934.00 $999,141.00
Sheet 3
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~ NGINI~I~I~IN G D~ DAI~TH ~ N T
Staff Report
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer~-~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND
FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 98-32,
SUBMI1-FED BY CARDLOCK FUELS SYSTEM, INC., LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, NORTH OF MARINO STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for CUP 98-32 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 98-32, located on the east side of Charles Smith
Avenue, north of Marino Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing
Faithful Performance Bond.
Developer: Cardlock Fuels System, Inc.
1825 West Collins Avenue
Orange, CA 91887
Release: Faithful Performance Bond RED 1050561 $34,000.00
Respe_c~ff~ ully submitted,.
Williar'n' J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
IIILLSIDE
Im [~fnE - J
WILSON "
BANYAN
#IeHLAN
UPLAND
BASELINE FONTANA
' THE cITY OF
Bth RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CUP 99-32
41h
ONTAJIIO
E OLUtION NO.
a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBliC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 98-32 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 98-32, have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
THE CITY OF
[ I
]~AN C H 0 CIJ CAi~I 0 N GA
SlaffReport
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 - RANCHO ETIWANDA
685, LLC - A request to modify certain sections of the development agreement
regarding the timing of construction of specific infrastructure improvements before
issuance of certain building permits for property generally located north of
Interstate 210, between Hanley Avenue and Day Creek Channel - Tentative Tract
Maps 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902.
RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the
Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 16, 2000, the City Council reviewed and approved
Development Agreement 00-02. The Development Agreement allowed for the construction of a
mixed-use residential development with 685 residential units and up to 2 commercial areas.
As part of the Development Agreement, the developer is required to perform specified
infrastructure improvements prior to issuance of certain building permits. However, because of
unexpected delays in preparation of construction planning, (street improvements, park planning,
landscaping plans, landscape maintenance district formation) the improvements will not be
completed by the anticipated time frame. The developer, therefore, is requesting to review the
maximum number of building permits issued before completion of the infrastructure
improvements.
On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed and unanimously recommended
approval of the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02.
The purpose of the Amendment is to allow the development of the project as it was originally
intended under Development Agreement 00-02. The Amendment to the Development
Agreement will not waive any previous conditions. The Amendment to the Development
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
AMENDMENT TO DA 00-02 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685 LLC
October 17, 2001
Page 2
Agreement will only modify the timing for the construction of certain infrastructure
improvements. Additional facts supporting the request are contained in the Planning
Commission staff report.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: According to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines,
the proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 is deemed exempt from further
CEQA clearance. This particular section of the CEQA Guidelines states, "Where it can be seen
with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect
on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA." It is determined that the amendment
will not result in any potential environmental impact, since no significant biological, geological, or
historical resources are known to exist on-site. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the
County Recorder following City Council approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Bullet
City Planner
BB:LH\ma
Attachments: Exhibit"A"- Site Map
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated September 26, 2001.
Notice of Exemption for Development Agreement 00-02
Ordinance
W~on Avenue
LEGEND
SINGLE FA~.Y
(7,~00 SF = MINIMUM LOT SIZE)
PUBLIC (PARK & ELEM. SCHOOL)
COI~MERCL~.L
RANCHO ETIWANDA
ADOPTED UNNERSrrY
,,,,: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
.4LLARD ENGINEERIN~
6101 CnI~/ ~ EXHISlT
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Commission could discuss the request this evening. He
staff did not feel the improvements should be with Phase 1.
Mr. that Phase 2 would include additional class rooms and a new parking lot and
Phase )nstruction of a sanctuary, Boy Scout clubhouse, and additional parking lot.
Commissioner Tolsto, ndergrounding should be tied to street improvements.
Chairman McNiel opened the I ring.
Richard Green, Pastor, Northkirk Pre.~ 9101 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
thanked staff for assistance in He stated they ag reed with the proposed
conditions. He said they plan to do the under( ' i conjunction with street improvements on
Beryl Street in Phase 2.
Chairman McNiel asked the current membership of the ch
Pastor Green responded it is approximately 200 adults. He not anticipate a great
increase in the use of the properby during Phase 1.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public headng.
Commissioner Mannedno felt it made sense to require the undergrounding
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, pointed out that the resolution calls for undergroundin¢
Street in Phase 2 and an in-lieu fee toward future undergrounding of utilities on the opposite ~
19th Street in conjunction with Phase 3.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt that was good.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Macias, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the
resolution approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00426. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: MANNERII . MCNIEL
- carded
F. AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT00-02-RANCHOETIWANDA685, LLC..
A request to modify certain sections of the development agreement regarding the timing of
construction of specific infrastructure improvements, generally located north of Interstate 210
between HanleyAvenue and Day Creek Channel-Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through 14498,
14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel asked the reasoning for the changes.
Mr. Henderson replied that the number of building permits tdgger improvements. He noted that
there are five different developers and those developers would have to be limited to pulling permits
for approximately 20 houses each under the original agreement. He felt the changes would not be
detrimental to the public.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 26, 2001
J32.
Jer~y Gahan, Project Manager, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, 5109 East La Palma, Suite D, Anaheim,
stated that five major builders are under contract for almost 700 lots. He stated the builders would
have to put out a lot of money to only be able to start development on 20 lots each and they would
have difficulty securing financing with only 20 lots for development. He said they plan to do the
infrastructure as soon as plans are approved and are already under construction on some of the
infrastructure. He indicated that Day Creek Boulevard will be completed pdor to the finagling of the
100th building permit.
Headng no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Mannedno felt the amendment makes sense.
Chairman McNiel agreed.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to recommend approval of Amendment to
Development Agreement 00-02. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: MAClAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carded
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-
00534 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST- A request to amend the circulation within the Industrial
Park Distdct (Subarea 6), to eliminate Center Avenue between 6th Street and Trademark
Street. Related Files: Development Review DRCDR00-41, Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00394. Staff has prepared a Mitigated
Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
BUSINESS
I. CABOT
L~are foot industrial building on 39.96
acres of land in th~ ), located on the south side of 6th Street
between Haven and _~10-072-06, 11, 16, 17, and 35. Related Files:
Development Code Amendment Area Specific Plan Amendment
00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001- a Mitigated Negative
Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration
Senior Civil Engineer Dan James and Associate Planner Kirt Coury
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho (
he represented the applicant. He concurred with the staff report and
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman
Chairman McNiel q
Mr. James originally planned to cut through the project because
the land subdivided into smaller lots. He observed that with the development of
Commission Minutes -5- September 26, 2001
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga
County of San Bernardino P.O. Box 807
385 N. Arrowhead, 2nd Floor Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
San Bernardino, CA 92415
Project Title: Development Agreement Amendment 00-02
Project Location - Generally located north of Interstate 210, between Hanley Avenue and Day Creek
Channel - Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902
Project Location - City: Rancho Cucamonga
Project Location - County: San Bemardino
Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: A request to modify certain sections of the
development agreement regarding the timing of construction of specific infrastructure improvements before
issuance of certain building permits for property.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Exempt Status (Check one)
_ Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
_ Declared Emergency(Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
_ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)
~ Categorical Exemption. State type and section number 15061(b)(3)
_ Statutory Exemptions. State code number
Reasons Why Project is Exempt: There is no possibility that the activity in question may have a
significant effect on the environment since no significant biological, geological, or historical resources
are known to exist on-site.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner
Area Code/Telephone/Extension: (909) 477-2750
If Filed by Applicant
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project?
Yes_ No_
Signature: Date: October 17 2001
Title: William J. Alexander, Mayor
H. The Development Agreement, together with this First Amendment, and the
consent of Parties to each of its terms and conditions will eliminate uncertainty in planning and provide for
the orderly development of the Property, eliminate uncertainty about the validity of exactions imposed by
the City, ensure timely installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate to
the development of the Project, and generally serve the public interest.
I. The Parties hereby acknowledge compliance with Section 5(D)(6) of the
Development Agreement regarding amendments and/or modifications to Development Agreement 00-02.
The Parties will seek the written consent of each Modgagee to said Development Agreement prior to the
execution of this First Amendment. The Parties agree not to modify or amend this Development
Agreement unless they receive written consent of all Mortgagees to the Development Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants
contained in this First Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2(C)(9)(c)(iii) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read
as follows:
"Tra~c signals shall be installed on Day Creek Boulevard at its intersections with
Wilson Avenue, Banyan Avenue, and Vintage Drive. The traffic signal at the intersection
of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard shall be installed prior to the issuance of the
two-hundred and fiftieth (250'h) building permit or earlier if determined to be warranted by
the City Engineer. The other traffic signals shall be installed by the end of the Project
development, or earlier if determined to be warranted by the City Engineer."
2. Section 2(C)(9)(c)(vii) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read
as follows:
"Wilson Avenue shall be open to public traffic, but not necessarily fully improved,
prior to issuance of the two-hundred and fiftieth (250th) residential building permit, or
when otherwise determined to be warranted by the City Engineer, whichever occurs first."
3. Section 2(C)(9)(c)(vii)(viii) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to
read as follows:
"Property Owner shall construct Day Creek Boulevar~ from State Route 30 to
Vintage Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit "F". Such construction shall be completed prior
to the issuance of the two-hundredth (200th) residential building permit, or the finalization
of the one-hundredth (100th) residential building permit, whichever shall occur first. The
Parties hereby acknowledge this construction ca6not be completed without the
cooperation of third parties who own the properties on the west side of Day Creek
Boulevard above Route 30 or by condemnation of a right-of-way along these properties.
If, for any reason outside the control of the City and the Property Owner, Property Owner
cannot timely complete the construction of this portion of Day Creek Boulevard, then
Property Owner shall be entitled to deposit with the City a sum of cash, bond, or letter of
credit equal to two-hundred percent (200%) of the projected actual costs, either total or
partial, of such construction in full and complete satisfaction of its obligation, and to be
relieved of any further restrictions on the issuance of building permits. If the City is
required to construct these improvements because of the Property Owner's failure or
inability to do so, then the Property Owner shall be entitled to an accounting for the use of
11231,0001,670337.1 I ~~
funds by the City to complete the construction and t'o a refund of monies not used for
such construction."
4. Section 2(D)(1)(a) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Property Owner agrees to construct Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue prior
to the issuance of the two-hundredth (200th) building permit. If Property Owner fails to do
so, Property Owner shall post a cash deposit, bond, or letter of credit in the amount of
two hundred percent (200%) of the value of the completion of the extension of Banyan
Avenue. Property owner further agrees to promptly make such improvements for
acceptance by the City Engineer before the issuance of any building permit for each
housing unit over and above one hundred (100) units. However, if, for any reason not
within the control of the City or the Property Owner, the City cannot obtain the Permits so
that Properly Owner can complete the improvements prior to the issuance of the building
permit for the one-hundred and first such unit, Property Owner shall be entitled to either
deposit with the City a sum of cash, bond, or letter of credit equal to two-hundred percent
(200%) of the projected actual cost, either total or partial, of the construction of the
improvements in full and complete satisfaction of its obligation, and to be relieved of any
further restrictions on the issuance of building permits. If the City is required to construct
these improvements because of the Property Owner's failure or inability to do so, then
Property Owner shall be entitled to an accounting for the City's use of the funds to
complete the improvements, and to a refund of monies not used for such improvements."
5. Section 2(D)(1)(b) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Property Owner agrees to construct Day Creek Boulevard north to Wilson
Avenue concurrently with Phase 1 (as defined in the Revised University Entitlements)
and that such improvements shall be substantially comp ete prior to the issuance of the
two-hundredth (200'h) residential building permit, or the finalization of the one-hundredth
(100th) building permit, whichever shall occur first. T6e City agrees to promptly process
all applications and permits consistent with its usual and customary procedures.
Streetscape improvements from the curb will be constructed as development of the
adjacent tracts occurs."
6. Section 2(D)(2) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Property Owner agrees to construct the Park (as defined in the Revised
University Project Entitlements), and such construction shall be substantially complete no
later than the issuance of the three-hundredth (300th) building permit in the Project. The
Park site shall be in substantial conformity with the depiction on Exhibit "S" as well as in
conformance with ADA standards, except that the Parties agree that the Park will be
constructed with up to four (4) lit basketball courts and two (2) lit ball fields. The Parties
agree that the product specifications for the Park amenities are listed on Exhibits "S-1"
through "S-2" and that such amenities shall conform to City standards. The quantities
and sizes of the amenities and materials shall be as depicted on Exhibit "S-3" and any
remaining issues shall conform to City standards. The Parties agree that the Property
Owner shall be required to have all homeowners within the Project sign an
acknowledgment form (the "form") regarding the Park. The form shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to the issuance of the first building
permit. The City agrees to promptly process all applications and permits consistent with
its usual and customary procedures. The City agrees that through dedication of 10 acres
and construction of the Park, Property Owner will exceed, through its construction costs,
11231\0001\670337.1
- 3 -
ORDINANCE NO. ~ ?/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT 00-02, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
FOR THE PURPOSE OF MODIFYING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING THE TIMING OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIFIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF INTERSTATE
210, EAST OF HANLEY AVENUE AND WEST OF DAY CREEK
CHANNEL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 14493 THROUGH 14498,
14522, 14523, 15838, AND 15902.
A. Recitals.
1. California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a
waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and
discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make
maximum efficient utilization of resoumes at the least economic cost to the public.
b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the
project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules
and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning
process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic
costs of development."
2. California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal
or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this
article..."
3. California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows:
"A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the
permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes.
The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and
requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses
and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..."
4. "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference is proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02, concerning that properly
generally located north of Interstate 210, east of Day Creek Channel and west of Hanley
Avenue, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this
Ordinance, the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is
referred to as the "Development Agreement."
135
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT TO DA 00-02 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC
October 17, 2001
Page 2
5. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed hearing concerning the Development Agreement and
concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval through adoption of its
Resolution No. 01-89.
6. On October 3, 2001 and continued to October 17, 2001, the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing conceming the Development
Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: According to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed
street vacation is deemed exempt from further CEQA clearance. This particular section of the
CEQA Guidelines states, '~Nhere it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to
CEQA." It is determined that the Amendment to the Development Agreement will not result in
any potential environmental impact, since no significant biological, geological, or historical
resources are known to exist onsite. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County
Recorder following City Council approval.
SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-referenced
public hearing on October 3, 2001, and continued to October 17, 2001, including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a) The location, design, and proposed uses set forth in this Development Agreement
are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity.
b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good
zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement.
SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Amendment to Development Agreement
00-02, attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin,
a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
(Space Above This Line For Recorder's Use Only)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-02
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-02 ("First
Amendment") is entered into by and between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal
corporation (the "City"), and RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
("RE685") (collectively, the "Parties"), with reference to the following facts and objectives:
RECITALS
A. On November 29, 2000, the City and U.C.P., Inc., entered into a Development
Agreement ("Development Agreement") regarding development of structures (the "Project") on that
certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A" of the Development Agreement and incorporated
herein by this reference.
B. On December 22, 2000, Development Agreement No. 00-02 ("Development
Agreement") became effective upon recordation by the City. The Development Agreement was recorded
in the official records of San Bernardino County, State of California, as Instrument No. 20-000472811.
C. The Development Agreement set forth specific rules and regulations, permitting
procedures, land use entitlements, and other design and infrastructure specifications regarding the
development of the Property.
D. On April 3, 2001, U.C.P., Inc. declared its intent to assign its interest in the
Development Agreement to RE685, a related entity, which assignment was approved by the City on April
18, 2001. U.C.P., Inc. and RE685, shortly thereafter, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement of
Real Property concerning the Property.
E. The City and RE685 now jointly desire to amend the provisions of the
Development Agreement as set forth herein with regard to certain circulation issues, timing of
development and fees, and the general management of the Project site.
F. This First Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the City °
of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and Specific Plan, as each have been amended, and each of its
elements, and will serve to implement the policies, objectives and standards of each element of those
documents.
G. All actions taken by the City have been duly taken in accordance with all
applicable legal requirements, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code
Section 21000, et. seq., and all requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other
procedural matters.
11231\0001\670337.1
'1
H. The Development Agreement, together with this First Amendment, and the
consent of Parties to each of its terms and conditions will eliminate uncertainty in planning and provide for
the orderly development of the Property, eliminate uncertainty about the validity of exactions imposed by
the City, ensure timely installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate to
the development of the Project, and generally serve the public interest.
I. The Parties hereby acknowledge compliance with Section 5(D)(6) of the
Development Agreement regarding amendments and/or modifications to Development Agreement 00-02.
The Parties will seek the written consent of each Mortgagee to said Development Agreement prior to the
execution of this First Amendment. The Parties agree not to modify or amend this Development
Agreement unless they receive written consent of all Mortgagees to the Development Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants
contained in this First Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2(C)(9)(c)(iii) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read
as follows:
"Traffic signals shall be installed on Day Creek Boulevard at its intersections with
Wilson Avenue, Banyan Avenue, and Vintage Drive. The traffic signal at the intersection
of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard shall be installed prior to the issuance of the
two-hundred and fiftieth (250th) building permit or earlier if determined to be warranted by
the City Engineer. The other traffic signals shall be installed by the end of the Project
development, or earlier if determined to be warranted by the City Engineer."
2. Section 2(C)(9)(c)(vii) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read
as follows:
"VVilson Avenue shall be open to public traffic, but not necessarily fully improved,
prior to issuance of the two-hundred and fiftieth (250th) residential building permit, or
when otherwise determined to be warranted by the City Engineer, whichever occurs first."
3. Section 2(C)(9)(c)(vii) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read
as follows:
"Property Owner shall construct Day Creek Boulevard from State Route 30 to
Vintage Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit "F". Such construction shall be completed prior
to the issuance of the two-hundredth (200th) residential building permit, or the finalization
of the one-hundredth (100th) residential building permit, whichever shall occur flint. The
Parties hereby acknowledge this construction cannot be completed without the
cooperation of third parties who own the properties on the west side of Day Creek
Boulevard above Route 30 or by condemnation of a right-of-way along these properties.
If, for any reason outside the control of the City and the Property Owner, Property Owner
cannot timely complete the construction of this portion of Day Creek Boulevard, then
Property Owner shall be entitled to deposit with the City a sum of cash, bond, or letter of
credit equal to two-hundred percent (200%) of the projected actual costs, either total or
partial, of such construction in full and complete satisfaction of its obligation, and to be
relieved of any further restrictions on the issuance of building permits. If the City is
required to construct these improvements because of the Property Owner's failure or
inability to do so, then the Property Owner shall be entitled to an accounting for the use of
11231\0001\670337
funds by the City to complete the construction and to a refund of monies not used for
such construction."
4. Section 2(D)(1)(a) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Property Owner agrees to construct Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue prior
to the issuance of the two-hundredth (200th) building permit. If Property Owner fails to do
so, Property Owner shall post a cash deposit, bond, or letter of credit in the amount of
two hundred percent (200%) of the value of the completion of the extension of Banyan
Avenue. Property owner further agrees to promptly make such improvements for
acceptance by the City Engineer before the issuance of any building permit for each
housing unit over and above one hundred (100) units. However, if, for any reason not
within the control of the City or the Property Owner, the City cannot obtain the Permits so
that Property Owner can complete the improvements prior to the issuance of the building
permit for the one-hundred and first such unit, Property Owner shall be entitled to either
deposit with the City a sum of cash, bond, or letter of credit equal to two-hundred percent
(200%) of the projected actual cost, either total or partial, of the construction of the
improvements in full and complete satisfaction of its obligation, and to be relieved of any
further restrictions on the issuance of building permits. If the City is required to construct
these improvements because of the Property Owner's failure or inability to do so, then
Property Owner shall be entitled to an accounting for the City's use of the funds to
complete the improvements, and to a refund of monies not used for such improvements."
5. Section 2(D)(1)(b) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Property Owner agrees to construct Day Creek Boulevard north to Wilson
Avenue concurrently with Phase 1 (as defined in the Revised University Entitlements)
and that such improvements shall be substantially complete prior to the issuance of the
two-hundredth (200th) residential building permit, or the finalization of the one-hundredth
(100th) building permit, whichever shall occur first. The City agrees to promptly process
all applications and permits consistent with its usual and customary procedures.
Streetscape improvements from the curb will be constructed as development of the
adjacent tracts occurs."
6. Section 2(D)(2) of the Development Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Property Owner agrees to construct the Park (as defined in the Revised
University Project Entitlements), and such construction shall be substantially complete no
later than the issuance of the three-hundredth (300th) building permit in the Project. The
Park site shall be in substantial conformity with the depiction on Exhibit "S" as well as in
conformance with ADA standards, except that the Parties agree that the Park will be
constructed with up to four (4) lit basketball courts and two (2) lit ball fields. The Parties
agree that the product specifications for the Park amenities are listed on Exhibits "S-l"
through "S-2' and that such amenities shall conform to City standards. The quantities
and sizes of the amenities and materials shall be as depicted on Exhibit "S-3" and any
remaining issues shall conform to City standards. The Parties agree that the Property
Owner shall be required to have all homeowners within the Project sign an
acknowledgment form (the "form") regarding the Park. The form shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to the issuance of the first building
permit. The City agrees to promptly process all applications and permits consistent with
its usual and customary procedures. The City agrees that through dedication of 10 acres
11231\0001\670337.1
and construction of the Park, Property Owner will exceed, through its construction costs,
ail requirements of the City's parks fees and applicable standards. The City waives any
requirement for payment of a Park fee against the Revised University Project. Property
Owner shall dedicate the Park to the City and the City shall accept the dedication
promptly upon completion. The City reserves the right to name the Park."
7. Section 2(J) is hereby amended to include a new subsection (4) entitled: "Third
Party Contract Planner", to read as follows:
"The Property Owner has requested the services of a contract planner to assist
and otherwise specifically work on the Project. The Parties hereby agree that a third-
party contract planner may be retained by the City provided that the Property Owner
deposit a minimum of one-hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per year for a period
of two years to fund a minimum of one-thousand (1,000) hours per year of services by
such third-party contract planner. The Property Owner further agrees to deposit said
amount within ten (10) days from the effective date of this First Amendment to
Development Agreement 00-088, as executed by the parties."
8. Section 2(J) is hereby amended to include a new subsection (5) entitled:
"Cooperation Among the Parties", to read as follows:
"The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the Property Owner and City
Staff shall hold regular bi-weekly meetings regarding the status of Project, including but
not limited to, construction deadlines, completion of off-site improvements, and other
development activities concerning the Project."
9. The Property Owner agrees to pay all costs, expenses, resultant charges, and
damages, including but not limited to attorney's fees and the cost of any additional mitigation measures or
project revisions determined by a final judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to be required under
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") or State CEQA Guidelines, incurred by or imposed
upon City as a result of any litigation attacking this First Amendment, the approval of said First
Amendment, or any other aspect of the Project.
10. Upon execution of this First Amendment, City shall promptly arrange for its
recordation as provided in Government Code Section 65868.5. Failure to record this First Amendment
within the time period provided for in Section 65868.5 shall not affect its validity or enforceability amongst
the Parties hereto.
11. The Development Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, sets forth
and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. There are no oral or written
representations, understandings, undertakings, or agreements that are not contained or expressly
referred to in these documents, and any such representations, understandings, or agreements are
superseded by the Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment. No evidence of any such
representations, understandings, or agreements shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or
nature relating to the terms or conditions of the Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, its
interpretation, or breach.
12. The person or persons executing this First Amendment on behalf of the parties to
the First Amendment warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the parties to the
performance of their o61igations hereunder.
13. Except as set forth in this First Amendment, all provisions of the Development
Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the
11231\0001~670337.1
/qb
Development Agreement on the day and year set forth below.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:.
Mayor
Dated:
A']-I'EST:
By:.
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:
City Attorney
Dated:
PROPERTY OWNER
By: Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC
5109 La Palma, Suite D
Anaheim Hills, California 92807
By:
Authorized Agent
By: Date:
Its:
By: Date:
11231~0001~670337 . i
s
R./W R/W
WEST EAST
102'
TEMPOP~Y~- / ' AC CURB
SHOULDER AC CURB' ~ . - ----- SHOULDER
FIOUIE 00 TO VINTAGE DRIVE
Nff.$.
R/W J
WEST EAST
12' ' 32 10 . . 32 ' ' 16' 9' LANDSCA~
EASEMENT
VINTAGE DRIVE TO WILSON AVENUE
N.T.S.
WILSON AVENUE TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE
N.T.S.
RANCHO ETIWANDA
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
~: STREET CROSS SECTION
,4 T J.ARD
C~'l En~in~efl~g - I~r,d Planning
"°'"'-'
~-. ~=-.. ~- EXHIBIT F
, ~..~,,~..,~., ~,:,~....~,.~...~,~. ~.,~u~ Note: Product Specifications
,* are per City of Rancho
~ ~,~,~,.~ .,,~,,..,~,~=,~,~.,,,,-,~- ,~..~,m~,~ Cucamonga Standards
RANCHO ETIWANDA-
PRODUCT ~~..,ATIONS
· .Ex,err 8-~ //-/3
~,,,~.~u~ Note: Product Specifications
are per City of Rancho
Cucamonga Standards.
RANCHO ETIWANDA
PRODUCT ,'BPECiFICAT~ NS
EXHIBIT 0-2 /6//7/
Rancho Etiwanda
DATE ESTIMATED: 4/15/00
DATE PRINTED: 4/21/00
ITEM I QUANTITY I MEASURE
Park Softscape Per 10-19-99 Plans
24' Box Tipu Trees 8 EA.
24" Box Elms 31 EA.
24" Box Evergreen Pear 19 EA.
24" Box Plum 11 EA.
15 Gallon Plane Tree 54 EA.
15 Gallon Pine Mondel 43 EA.
48" Box Pine Canary 25 EA.
36" Box Crepe Myrtle 11 EA.
24" Box Flame Tree 13 EA.
24" Box Camphor 43 EA.
Shrub/Ground Cover
Lonicera 24,572 SF
Myoporum 5,684 SF
Star Jasmine 1,662 SF
Turf - per City of Rancho Cucamonga seed mix 314,298 SF
Cobble 30,657 SF
Park Hardscape Per 10-19-99 Plans
Tot Lot area with 1,500 sf ADA rubber surface I EA.
Lighted Basketball Courts 4 EA.
Parking stalls with access to school parking 65 EA.
Restroom Building (per plan) I EA.
Entry Monumentation with Signage 1 EA.
Picnic Tables (1 HDCP) 14 EA.
Two-Bin Trash Enclosure 1 EA.
Ddnking Fountain 2 EA.
BBQ Grill 12 EA.
Trash Receptacles 2
Bench 8 EA.
1,200 sf Wood Arbor Structure 2 EA.
EXHIBIT S - 3
THE C I T Y OF
I~ANCBO CIJCAHONGA
S affReport
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The City of Rancho Cucamonga
has completed the Draft City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update. The
Project Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000
acres) as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is
located north of the City. This update includes changes in land use designations
as well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements the City's
General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of
approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres in non-
residential uses. Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is
reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres. Within
the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential
uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the
implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e.,
future) development would occur with buildout: approximately 13,524 dwelling
units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately
52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and
approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The ProjecqPlanning Area
includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to the north. The
City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west
of downtown San Bernardino. The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the
north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to
the west, south and east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is
approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is
approximately 7,700 acres. Total project, planning area comprises approximately
31,700 acres. During these public hearings the City Council will consider the
Final EIR and proposed statements of overriding considerations. Certification of
the Final EIR and final action on the General Plan Update will occur after the
close of the public hearings.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 17, 2001
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the General Plan Update and EIR.
The City Council held a public hearing on October 3, 2001, during which no additional public
testimony was presented. Consider any additional public comment and give direction as
needed. Motion to approve the attached Resolutions for all applicable environmental
documents and this application is recommended. In addition, direct staff to incorporate all
applicable amendments from April 1999 until now into the General Plan Document for final
publication and distribution.
BACKGROUND:
General Plan Task Force and Planninq Commission Action: On July 2, 2001, the General Plan
Task Force reviewed these documents and unanimously recommended that they be forwarded
for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. On August 8, September 12,
2001, and September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission considered the General Plan Update
and Draft EIR (including Response to Comments and Mitigation Plan).
Environmental Determination: The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) serves as an
informational document for public agency decision-makers and the general public regarding the
objectives and components of the proposed project. This document addresses the potentially
significant adverse environmental impacts that may be associated with buildout of the proposed
General Plan, as well as identifies feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be
adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts. This EIR is the primary reference document for
the formulation and implementation of a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed
General Plan.
The intent of this EIR is to provide a Program EIR that evaluates the broad-scale impacts of the
General Plan. A Program EIR is considered a "first-tier" document (California CEQA guidelines,
Section 15152). "Second-tier" documents, such as Project EIRs, Focused EIRs, or Mitigated
Negative Declarations, typically follow and evaluate the impacts of a single activity undertaken
to implement the Plan.
On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR for the General Plan Update was released for the 45-day
review period, which ended on August 6, 2001. The EIR and General Plan Task Force staff
report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001.
The Final EIR (including the Response to Comments) has been included for review by the City
Council.
Draft General Plan Update: The proposed project is the update of the Rancho Cucamonga
General Plan. The Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres),
as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City.
This update includes changes in land use designations, as well as updates to the policies and
programs within the City's General Plan. No substantial changes in the existing land use
designations are included in the proposed update. The changes in land uses are attributable to
a number of things: new guidance for Mixed Use areas and technical refinements to the PLan to
reflect existing or proposed development. With the implementation of the proposed General
Plan, the following additional (i.e., future) development would occur with buildout:
approximately 13,524 dwelling units; approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial;
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA99-07 - CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 17, 2001
Page 3
approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial; no additional public/quasi-public uses, and
approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways.
The singular goal and purpose of the General Plan is to present the Rancho Cucamonga Vision
(described further in Chapter II) and give guidance to its implementation. The Plan
accomplishes this through a series of policies and implementation actions or programs related
to more specific issues that are important. These policies, in turn, are applied to both public and
private development projects and decisions. Where the City does not have development
authority, as in the unincorporated area or regarding certain functions handled by another unit of
government, the General Plan seeks to influence the appropriate decision making bodies so
that their decisions reinforce our City's vision.
The General Plan is, in effect, the "Constitution" for development in the community.
Consequently, it is imperative that it be used as the basic frame of reference in making
development and conservation decisions within the planning area, whether they involve public
or private lands.
Policy is expressed in this Plan in both mapped and written form. The maps depict the
geographic application of policy and express the desired pattern of development and
conservation that define our community. Wdtten policy expresses decision-making guidance
related to what is depicted on the maps or, if the subject is not mapped, as a guide to certain
decision points defined by the policy. Additional diagrams and illustrations are included to
further assist in interpretation of policy and application to specific situations.
Occasionally, users of the General Plan may want additional information regarding the
background and reasoning behind policies in the Plan. Referring to the Appendices or, in some
cases, to the General Plan EIR, can satisfy these needs.
The Draft General Plan Update represents the complete elements that were previously
reviewed at separate times by staff and the General Plan Task Force. This Draft has
incorporated the changes previously requested. Future modifications will be reserved until the
end of the public hearing process.
The Draft General Plan and General Plan Task Force staff repod and Draft Environmental
Impact Report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on
June 28, 2001. In addition, the Addendum - Responses to Comments for Draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR), Housing Element Update, Pages 1-116 and 1-118, Housing Element
Update, Technical Appendix VI - Government Constraints, Pages 4, 14 and 15 and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program were previously distributed with the Planning Commission report.
ANALYSIS: This update of the General Plan is very thorough and because of certain technical
advances, such as the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for the
preparation of maps and storage and retrieval of information, the City realizes a greater benefit
than from the last update. This is significant because one of the advantages we now have is the
ability to manage and maintain General Plan information much more readily than in the past. In
effect, the General Plan in its current form is a powerful resource and land management device
that will contribute to the City government's efficiency and effectiveness in making and carrying
out development decisions.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
GPA99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 17, 2001
Page 4
It is interesting to note that the amount of land use change reflected in this version of the Plan
relative to earlier versions is surprisingly slight. This speaks to two things: 1) previous land use
policy direction has proven to be sound; and 2) many aspects of community development now
requiring attention have more to do with sustaining the quality of development than shaping
changes in what land use patterns are desired.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:LH\ma
Attachments: Resolution Recommending the Certification of the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)
Resolution Recommending Approval of the Draft General Plan Update
RESOLUTION NO ~;)/- ~ ~=~7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE 2001 GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, MAKING
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND
MAKING ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AS
REQUIRED BY LAW
A. Recitals.
1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conformance with the
requirements of State Law, adopted a complete General Plan and certified the Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan on April 6, 1981, by the approval of Resolution
No. 81-40.
2. After various amendments and partial updates, the City commenced the process of
preparing a comprehensive update of its General Plan in 1999. The process of updating the
General Plan has involved various departments of the City and included numerous meetings of
a General Plan Task force, which was comprised of representatives from the City Council,
Planning Commission, staff, and community members. As a result of that process, a draft
General Plan Update has now been completed.
3. The General Plan Update was prepared pursuant to Section 65300 et seq. of the
State Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code) to provide the City with
comprehensive, long-range policy guidelines for future growth and development which
incorporates the mandated elements, including Land Use, Circulation (Transportation), Housing,
Conservation (Environmental Resources), Open Space, Noise, and Safety (Public Health and
Safety). In addition, the General Plan Update sets forth "The Rancho Cucamonga Vision" and
includes additional provisions to address Public Facilities and Services, Community Design,
Economic Development, and Air Quality.
4. An Initial Study was prepared for the General Plan Update (the "project") pursuant to
Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines by the Planning Department staff with the
assistance of the City's environmental consultant, Michael Brandman Associates. The Initial
Study, which was completed on May 22, 2000, identified that there was substantial evidence
that the project may have a significant impact on several environmental resources and
governmental services. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, a
decision was made to prepare an EIR for the project.
5. On May 22, 2000, a Notice of Preparation was prepared and sent to the State
Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California and to other
responsible agencies. The review period on the Notice of Preparation closed on July 7, 2000.
6. On June 22, 2001, the Draft fIR was completed and made available for public
review. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of
Completion of the Draft EIR, which was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research.
Public Notice of Availability of the EIR and of the comment period was provided pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section 21092 and a copy of the Notice was posted in the office of the
County Clerk in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.3. The EIR was
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 2
circulated to interested agencies between June 22, 2001, and August 6, 2001, for a 45-day
comment period pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087. Comments were received
and responses prepared and incorporated into the EIR. A copy of the Final EIR is on file in the
Planning Division in the City.
7. On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public hearing on the
General Plan Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Notice of the
time, place, and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in
accordance with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and 65090.
8. On September 19, and continued to October 3, 2001, and on October 17, 2001, the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public
hearing on the General Plan Update and Draft General Plan EIR. Notice of the time, place, and
subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in accordance ,
with the requirements of Government Code Section 65355 and 65090.
9. The Final EIR referred to in this resolution consists of that draft document dated June
2001, entitled Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Draft Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027), written comments on that draft report, and written
responses thereto an addendum to the EIR submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, attached as Exhibit "A" of the September 12, 2001 Planning Commission staff
report for this item, and written testimony presented by the City's staff and the City's consultant
during the hearings on the recommended adoption of said General Plan Update, insofar that the
testimony pertained to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-mentioned documents
will be referred to as "the Final EIR."
10. The General Plan Update was prepared in accordance with the General Plan
Guidelines promulgated by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. In addition, the
Noise Element was prepared consistent with the guidelines established by the Office of Noise
Control in the State Department of Health Services, and the Circulation (Transportation)
Element is consistent with the currently applicable Congestion Management Plan.
11. The City submitted the proposed General Plan Update to other public agencies for
review as follows:
a. The draft Housing Element was submitted to the California Department of
Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review. On August 14, 2001, HCD informed
the City that only minor changes to the Element would be required to obtain its certification,
which changes have now been made.
b. The City consulted with the Division of Mines and Geology of the Department of
Conservation and the Office of Emergency Services for the purposes of including information
known by that Division into the General Plan as required by Government Code Section 65302
(g). In addition, the provisions that comprised the Safety Element were submitted to the same
Division for review of seismic safety policies.
c. The proposed General Plan Update was distributed for review and comment
pursuant to Government Code Section 65352 to interested parties including, but not limited to,
I$1
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 3
the County of San Bemardino, local school districts, water purveyors, and other interested
parties.
12. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The City Council specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this
Resolution are true and correct:
2. With respect to the potential significant environmental effects identified in the Final
EIR, the City Council specifically makes the following findings:
a. Soils and Geology
(1) Modifications in topography will occur within the Sphere-of-Influence area.
.The modifications will result from cutting native slopes. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which
mitigate or avoid this significant effect and the cumulative effects it will have
on the environment. This significant effect and the cumulative effects have
been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and
incorporated into the project that restrict upland areas to Iow density
residential use, require continued enforcement of the Hillside Development
Ordinance and Guidelines to ensure prudent development of properties that
have a slope greater than 10% and preservation, as open space, properties
that have a slope greater than 30%.
(2) The proposed General Plan would allow the development of hillside
residential uses within the northern portion of the Planning Area. This area
includes geologic hazards such as potential slope failures, landslides, and
erosion. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects and the
cumulative effects this will have on the environment. The significant effects
and the cumulative effects, have been eliminated or substantially lessened
to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as
identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project that, among
other things, require geologic engineering investigations for developments
proposed in areas of potential geologic hazards, restrictions on
development in areas with unsafe geological conditions, mitigation of
private properties where City property or public right-of-way is threatened
from slope instability or where considered appropriate and urgent by the
City Engineer, Fire, or Police Departments, disaster recovery measures
following severe winter storms, and a third-party review of geotechnical
reports for private development projects.
152
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 4
(3) Development occurring within the Planning Area and under the proposed
General Plan could experience seismic hazards. These hazards include
ground rupture, ground shaking, and ground failure. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or
avoid the significant effects and the cumulative effects on the environment.
The significant effects and cumulative effects have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that include, but are not limited to, regulating the type and intensity
of new development in potential seismic hazard areas, compliance with
State regulations, including setbacks, for Special Study Zones,
strengthening planned utilities, encouraging the retrofitting of unreinforced
masonry buildings, and other measures.
(4) Construction activities associated with the implementation of the proposed
General Plan could result in short-term windblown sand impacts. Changes
or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects and cumulative effects on the
environment. The significant effects and cumulative effects have been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
virtue of mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated
into the project that include encouraging the preservation of existing wind
rows (landscape buffers which reduce impacts from windblown sand), the
planting of protective landscape buffers on the eastern sides of proposed
projects, review of architectural plans for structures to reduce "wind tunnel"
effects, cooperating with neighboring jurisdictions in the reduction of
windblown sand, and requiring the suspension of grading operations during
high winds.
b. Hydrology and Drainage
(1) Grading activities associated with the implementation of the proposed
General Plan will result in cut and/or fill activities for future land uses.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects and cumulative
effects on the environment. The significant effects and cumulative effects
have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by a mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR and
incorporated into the project that requires the use of best management
practices to minimize pollutant runoff.
(2) Implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in the
development of approximately 5,000 acres of urban land uses that would
substantially increase potential storm water runoff from areas throughout
the Planning Area. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant effects and
cumulative effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
CiTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 5
that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in
the Final EIR and incorporated into the project that require storm water
facilities to be constructed that are adequate to accommodate the surface
water runoff generated by new development, the continued upgrade of the
City's drainage system in conjunction with plans and funds provided by the
County of San Bernardino Flood Control District, periodic review of the
City's flood control fees to ensure adequate funding is available to construct
the City's drainage system, and review and input into the level of
development intensity and current conservation practices within the City's
Sphere-of-Influence and the San Bernardino National Forest.
(3) With an increase in stormwater runoff from future development under the
proposed General Plan, there would also be the potential for an increase in
pollutants from new land uses that are conveyed to creeks, spreading
grounds and groundwater basins. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid these
significant effects and cumulative effects on the environment, These
significant effects and cumulative effects have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that will promote programs to protect water quality and conserve water
supplies in coordination with the Cucamonga County Water District,
protection of natural stream courses in the Planning Area from erosion and
pollution from urban runoff, and implementation of best management
practices to minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater
basin. This will include, where applicable, the preparation of Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Programs (SWPPPs) to control runoff from
construction sites.
c. Biological Resources
(1) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may potentially affect natural
biological communities. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant effects and
cumulative effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that include the City undertaking an
inventory of remaining natural areas within City limits for the purpose of
retaining important areas in their natural state, limiting encroachment of
development into these natural areas that have biological significance such
as the canyons in the existing Sphere-of-Influence area, requesting the
County's planning officials to require expanded biological studies for all
proposed developments within the City's Sphere-of-lnfiuence.
(2) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may potentially affect alluvial
fan sage scrub, a sensitive plant community. Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 6
this significant effect and cumulative effects on the environment. This
significant effect and cumulative effects have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that include the establishment of a biological assessment/clearinghouse to
identify areas of potential impact, especially regarding rare or endangered
species of flora and fauna, and the establishment of a conservation land
use designation to preserve the existing alluvial fan sage scrub. This
should include most of the remaining alluvial associations and all of the
streamside woodland, designation of approximately 1,000 acres of open
space within conservation areas in the Planning Area.
(3) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect threatened or
endangered species. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant effects and
cumulative effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measure as identified in
the Final EIR and incorporated into the project that requires that any
development that results in the potential take or substantial loss of
occupied habitat for any threatened or endangered species will require
formal consultation with the appropriate regulatory agency.
(4) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect nesting habitat for
migratory bird species. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant effects and
cumulative effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EiR and incorporated into the project that protect migratory birds and raptor
nests, encourage the planting of vegetation that will provide new habitat,
and the retention of specified windrows.
(5) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect Big Horn Sheep.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project that mitigate or avoid this significant effect and cumulative effect on
the environment. This significant effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of
mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that protect habitat areas designated as sensitive, or unique, or
those that contain rare, threatened, or endangered species, against direct
or indirect impacts.
(6) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant effects and
cumulative effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 7
the Final EIR and incorporated into the project that restricts proposed
development, including road development, in certain defined and
documented riparian corridors, compliance with the USACE Nationwide
Permit Program, Section 401 water quality certifications from the Regional
Water Quality Control Board, and Section 1603 streambed alteration
agreements, as required.
d. Land Use and Planning
(1) An increase in development may result in potential land use
incompatibilities. Incompatible land uses increase the potential for land use
conflicts to create noise, visual, development intensity, and privacy impacts.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects and cumulative effects
on the environment. The significant effects and cumulative effects have
been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR
and incorporated into the project that, among other things, promote
opportunities for mixed use development in carefully selected areas, restrict
strip commercial development in favor of more focused commercial or
mixed use centers, restricts the intensity of commercial concentrations at
intersections other than town center and regional center locations, lowering
residential intensities when adjacent to Iow density residential
neighborhoods, restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where they
would be threatened by man made hazards, concentrate heavy industrial
uses to areas east of the electrical power plant, and allow medium and high
density residential uses along transit routes in mixed-use areas and in the
vicinity of activity centers.
e. Traffic and Circulation
(1) Implementation of the proposed General Plan as well as year 2020 traffic
volumes from adjoining cities and areas will result in an approximately 128
percent (821,000 daily trips) increase over existing daily trips. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that
mitigate or avoid the significant effects and cumulative effects on the
environment. The significant effects and cumulative effects have been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated
into the project that include the required preparation of traffic impact studies
in accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan
(CMP), preparation of site-specific access studies, annual traffic monitoring
programs to ensure that funds from developers and development fees
remain adequate to finance on-going circulation projects, implementation of
changes in roadway classifications as identified, and the construction of the
6th Street/l-15 interchange.
(2) The proposed General Plan will result in 18 intersections operating at LOS
D or worse. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 8
into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects and cumulative
effects on the environment. These significant effects and cumulative
effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less
than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that require traffic studies for both
interim and future conditions at such intersections in connection with future
development projects, the preservation of sufficient right-of-way, and
specified improvements at certain intersections.
f. Noise
(1) Any siting of sensitive land uses, such as schools, churches, and
commercial office uses within the 60 and 65 dBA CNEL noise contours
represents a potentially significant impact. Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid
the significant noise effects and cumulative effects on the environment.
This significant effect and cumulative effects have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that include requiring project applicants to comply with increased setbacks,
the use of site-specific noise studies, and then compliance with various
sound mitigation measures and strategies as defined in the Final EIR.
(2) The proposed General Plan includes the siting of general industrial uses
immediately adjacent to residential land uses between Haven and Grove
Avenues, south of Arrow Route. Resultant noise from these general
industrial uses could exceed both the applicable 60 dBA daytime and 45
dBA nighttime standards. This significant effect and cumulative effects
have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of a mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR
and incorporated into the project that precludes industrial facilities from
being constructed within 500 feet of any commercial land uses or 2,800 feet
of any residential land uses without the preparation of a noise analysis.
g. Public Service and Utilities
(1) Police Services. Development under the proposed General Plan will result
in a demand for approximately 31 new police officers. This increased
demand for police services is a significant impact. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or
avoid this significant effect and cumulative effect on the environment. This
significant effect and cumulative effect has been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that provides that the City continue to adequately fund police services,
regularly evaluate and adjust its crime prevention programs, maintain an
average five-minute response time for emergency calls, encourage the use
of physical site planning as a tool in crime prevention, the continued
/57
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 9
promotion of neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, and the
continued use of volunteer forces (e.g., reserves and citizen patrol) to assist
with police duty.
(2) Fire Services. Development under the proposed General Plan will require
approximately six additional on duty fire fighters (or approximately 18 new
fire fighters due to the three shifts that the Department has per day).
Increased demand for fire protection and emergency medical services is a
significant impact. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effect on the environment. The significant effect and
cumulative effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that provide that the City will continue
to support the reduction of Urban Wildland threats through fire prevention,
public education, code compliance, internal fire sprinklers, vegetation
medications and reduction, adequate water supplies, improved ingress and
egress to development and adequately located, staffed, and equipped Fire
District stations. In addition, the City will continue to support adequate
funding of the Fire District and the provision of adequate fire flows by
adequate water storage, among other measures.
(3) Water. The proposed General Plan will result in the incremental demand
for approximately 10.1 million gallons of water within the Planning Area.
This increase in water demand represents an approximately thirty-five
percent (35%) increase over existing demand within the Planning Area.
This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant
impact and cumulative impact on existing water facilities. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
mitigate or avoid this significant effect and cumulative effect on the
environment. This significant effect and cumulative effect have been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that provide that the City will coordinate with the Cucamonga
County Water District and Inland Empire Utilities Agency to ensure
adequate water supplies and facilities, clustering of development in areas
suitable for groundwater replenishment, integration of structures to retain
precipitation and runoff into development designs, continued support of the
Cucamonga County Water District's efforts to develop canyon water supply
and to encourage water conservation, cooperation in efforts to expand the
re-use of wastewater where feasible, and continued implementation of
applicable provisions of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) for municipal and private projects to protect ground water
recharge areas from potential pollutant runoff.
(4) Wastewater. The proposed General Plan will result in the incremental
generation of approximately 4.0 million gallons per day of wastewater. This
increase in wastewater represents an approximately thirty-one percent
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 10
(31%) increase over the existing generation of wastewater within the
Planning Area. This increase is considered substantial and would result in a
significant impact on existing wastewater facilities. Changes or alterations
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or
avoid this significant effect and cumulative effect on the environment.
These significant effects and cumulative effects have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of a
mitigation measure as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that provide that the City will coordinate with the Inland Empire
Utility Agency and the Cucamonga County Water District to ensure
adequate wastewater facilities are available to meet future growth.
(5) Solid Waste. Development under the proposed General Plan will result in
the generation of approximate 236 tons of additional solid waste. This
increase represents an approximate eighty-seven percent (87%) increase
over the amount of solid waste that is currently being generated within the
Planning Area. This increase is considered substantial and would result in a
significant impact and cumulative effect on existing solid waste facilities.
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which mitigate or avoid this significant effect and cumulative effect
on the environment. This significant effect and cumulative effects have
been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and
incorporated into the project that provide that the City will continue to
implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939, and that the
City will coordinate with other public entities and solid waste haulers to
ensure adequate services and facilities are available inside and outside the
County to collect and dispose of solid waste.
(6) Natural Gas. The proposed General Plan will result in an incremental
demand for natural gas throughout the Planning Area. As shown in Table
5.9-9 of the Final EIR, there will be a demand for approximately 32.9 million
therms of natural gas per year. This represents an approximate eighty-one
percent (81%) increase in natural gas that is currently in demand
throughout the Planning Area. This increase is considered substantial and
would result in a significant impact and cumulative 'impact on existing
natural gas facilities. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects
and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant effect and
cumulative effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that provide that the City will provide
population projections to the Gas Company to ensure adequate planning
for natural gas demands.
(7) Electricity. The proposed General Plan will result in an incremental
demand for electricity throughout the Planning Area. There will be a
demand for approximately 659 million kilowatts of electricity per year. This
/59
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 11
· represents an approximate 117% increase in electricity that is currently in
demand throughout the Planning Area. This increase is considered
substantial and would result in a significant impact and cumulative impact
on existing electrical facilities. Changes or alterations have been required
in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid this significant
effect and cumulative effect on the environment. The significant effect and
cumulative effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that provide that the City will promote
and pursue various specified strategies to decrease dependence on
imported and non-renewable energy resources, promote circulation
planning that will 'contribute to the reduction of operational energy
requirements, promote use of energy efficient programs into commercial
and industrial developments where feasible, promote stfategies for a
balance of housing and employment opportunities within the City and
region, and provide population projections to Southern California Edison to
ensure adequate energy planning.
(8) Library Services. Implementation of the proposed General Plan would add
approximately 13,524 residential units and approximately 30,680 people to
the Planning Area compared to the residential units and population that
existed in the Planning Area as of January 2000. This increase in residents
will substantially increase the demand for library services. Based on a
minimum standard of 0.5 square feet of library space per person, the
incremental increase of approximately 30,680 residents to the Planning
Area would result in a demand for approximately 15,500 square feet of
library space. The City does not have any currently planned library facilities
within the Planning Area. Therefore, the residents associated with the
future development of the proposed General Plan would significantly impact
existing library services. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid this significant effect and
cumulative effect on the environment. This significant effect and
cumulative effect have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by a mitigation measure as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that provides that the City will provide
a minimum of 15,500 square feet of library space within the Planning Area
to serve future residents pursuant to the Library Master Plan.
h. Aesthetics and Visual Resources
(1) Build out of the proposed General Plan would result in a substantial
increase in urban uses throughout the Planning Area. The proposed
General Plan would allow replacement of existing uses: However~ the
majority of the new development is expected to occur on vacant land. New
development will be expected to conform to the design guidelines
established for residential, commercial, and industrial development. A high
level of quality through design will be expected based on existing guidelines
and the design review process conducted by staff and officials. Future
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 12
development in accordance with the proposed General Plan in the
Etiwanda Specific Plan and Sphere-of-Influence areas is expected to
substantially alter open space views. This alteration is also expected to
include obstructing existing panoramic views of the alluvial fan at the base
of the San Gabriel Mountains. The conversion of open space to urban uses
would result in the obstruction of existing open views as well as potentially
obstructing distant panoramic views from existing development. Changes
or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that
mitigate or avoid this significant effect, and the cumulative effect on the
environment. This significant effect and cumulative effect has been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the
project that will preserve and enhance the special qualities of existing
districts and neighborhoods through focused attention on land use,
community design and economic development, establishment of entry
monumentation as a means of stimulating community, district and
neighborhood identity, continued implementation and updating of the City's
comprehensive design guidelines, the establishment of transitions between
developed and the natural (unbuilt) environment, the creation of strong
landscape edges along roadways, the continued undergrounding of utilities,
ensuring that communication towers blend into the surrounding
environment, maintain the rural development patterns and character of the
Etiwanda area through the Etiwanda Specific Plan, create urban centers at
appropriate locations, ensure trees and structures are oriented to preserve
views of key locations and obstruction of views is kept to a minimum, and
protect and preserve windrows, vineyards and citrus groves where feasible
and the re-establishment of these special landscape elements within the
city.
i. Cultural Resources
(1) Prehistoric Archaeoloqical Resources. The impacts of future construction
activity could adversely affect, have cumulative effects, or eliminate existing
and potential archaeological resources. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project that 'mitigate or avoid these
significant and cumulative effects on the environment. The significant
effect and cumulative effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened
to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in
the Final EIR and incorporated into the project that provide that a qualified
archaeologist perform necessary field surveys where evidence suggests
the potential for prehistoric resources, communication with the Native
American Heritage Commission as specified when thero is the potential for
discovery of sacred land resources, and compliance with vadous
archaeological protocols as defined in the Final EIR.
(2) Historic Archaeoloqical Resources. The impacts of future construction
activity could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential historical
landmarks and points of interest. Changes or alterations have been
required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid this
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 13
significant and cumulative effect on the environment. This significant and
cumulative effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the Final
EIR and incorporated into the project that require the City to conduct
surveys, communicate with relevant historical preservation agencies and
entities, and compliance with a variety of historic preservation protocols as
defined in the Final EIR.
(3) Paleontoloqical Resources. Older alluvial deposits have a high sensitivity
rating as they may yield highly significant vertebrate fossils, although no
paleontological resources have been recorded from the area within the City
of Rancho Cucamonga and the Sphere-of-Influence. Changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
mitigate or avoid this significant effect and cumulative effect on the
environment. This significant and cumulative effect has been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project
that require the City to conduct surveys, communicate with relevant
paleontological preservation agencies and entities and compliance with a
variety of paleontological preservation protocols as defined in the Final EIR.
3. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the lead agency to
balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in
determining whether to approve the project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to
approve the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update project although significant and
unavoidable adverse impacts related to aggregate resources, prime farmland, short-term and
long-term air quality, long-term noise, librar7 services, and aesthetic and visual resources have
been identified in the EIR. Even though these adverse impacts are not reduced to a level
considered less than significant, the Planning Commission finds, pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 21081 (c) that those impacts are outweighed by the benefits of implementing the
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update because the General Plan Update will:
a. Conserve valuable natural resources by establishing policies under a new
conservation land use designation within the City and Sphere-of-Influence.
b. Provide more efficient, pedestrian-friendly use patterns at key locations by
establishing a new mixed use land use designation that is well-defined and would especially
promote joint development of residential and commercial uses.
c. Provide land use changes to the General Plan that would result in less overall
traffic volumes than under the existing General Plan.
d. Continue and augment the land use patterns and policy direction in the existing
General Plan to the maximum extent possible because of their demonstrated effectiveness.
e. Provide development and conservation direction for future annexation of the
Sphere-of-lnfiuence area.
f. Continue to preserve a large portion of the Sphere-of-Influence as open space.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 14
g. Promote policies to ensure City compliance with recent changes in various
federal and state laws (e.g. Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act).
In addition, the General Plan Update is itself a measure to mitigate potential adverse
impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a
planned and comprehensive approach to future development. The General Plan Update
includes current statistical information on the community and reflects changes in development
policies as well as established policies incorporated in the General Plan at its adoption in 1981.
The General Plan provides appropriate guidance for the establishment of zoning and
development regulations to mitigate growth induced impacts. Consequently, the adoption of the
General Plan Update will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less
significant in scope than would occur without General Plan guidance, including each alternative
analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Report.
Therefore, the City Council, having reviewed and considered the information
contained in the EIR and the public record, adopts these Statements of Overriding
Considerations, which has been balanced against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts
in reaching a decision on this project.
4. The City Council has reviewed and considered the alternatives to the project
discussed in the Final EIR. Those alternative are: (1) the "No Project/No Development"
alternative (EIR pages 7-2 - 7-3); (2) the "No Project/Development in Accordance with Existing
General Plan Land Use Designations" alternative (EIR pages 7-3 - 7-8); and (3) the "Higher
Intensity" alternative (EIR pages 7-8 - 7-13). With respect to these alternatives to the project,
the City Council finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, that there are
economic, social, and other considerations of the project that makes these alternatives
infeasible as specifically set forth on pages 7-1 - 7-13 of the EIR which findings are incorporated
herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. In addition, the City Council finds that other than
the "No Project" alternative, the proposed General Plan would result in less impacts compared
to the existing General Plan alternative and the "Higher Intensity" alternative. Therefore, for the
reasons indicated above, and for the reasons specified in Section 3 above, the proposed
General Plan Update is considered the environmentally superior alternative.
5. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program
attached as Exhibit "A" to this resolution, and finds that the Program has been prepared
pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and that such Program
is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.
6. The City Council finds that the City has reviewed the Housing Element Guidelines
adopted by HCD pursuant to Section 50459 of the Health and Safety Code and finds that the
housing goals, objectives, and policies stated in the revised Housing Element are appropriate
for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will contribute to the attainment of the state housing
goal. The City Council further finds that the adoption of the revised Housing Element will aid the
City's efforts to assist in the development of housing for all economic and demographic
segments of the community and that the Housing Element reflects the requirements of
Government Code Section 65583 (b). The City Council has considered the findings made by
the State Department of Housing and Community Development, and finds, pursuant to
Government Code Section 65585 (e)(1), that the revised Housing Element has been changed to
substantially comply with the comments of the State Department of Housing and Community
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
O~oberl7, 2001
Page 15
Development and with the provisions of Article 10.6 of Title 7 of the California Government
Code (Government Code Section 65580 et. seq.).
7. Based upon the findings contained herein, the City Council does hereby adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the General Plan Update and adopts the 2001
General Plan Update, as drafted, as the approved General Plan for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
RESOLUTION NO ~)A,~3 ?
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
A. ' Recitals.
1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conformance with the
requirements of State Law, adopted a complete General Plan and certified the Environmental
Impact Report for the General Plan on April 6, 1981, by the approval of Resolution No. 81-40.
2. After various amendments and partial updates, the City commenced the process of
preparing a comprehensive update of its General Plan in 1999. The process of updating the
General Plan has involved various departments of the City and included numerous meetings of
a General Plan Task Force, which was comprised of representatives from the City Council,
Planning Commission, staff and community members. As a result of that process, a draft
General Plan Update has now been completed.
3. An Initial Study was prepared for the General Plan Update (the "project") pursuant to
Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines by the Planning Department staff with the
assistance of the City's environmental consultant, Michael Brandman Associates. The Initial
Study, which was completed on May 22, 2000, identified that there was substantial evidence
that the project may have a significant impact on several environmental resources and
governmental services. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, a
decision was made to prepare an EIR for the project.
4. On May 22, 2000, a Notice of Preparation was prepared and sent to the State
Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California and to other
responsible agencies. The review period on the Notice of Preparation closed on July 7, 2000.
5. On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR was completed and made available for public
review. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of
Completion of the Draft EIR, which was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research.
Public Notice of Availability of the EIR and of the comment period was provided pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section 21092 and a copy of the Notice was posted in the office of the
County Clerk in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.3. The EIR was
circulated to interested agencies between June 22, 2001, and August 6, 2001, for a 45-day
comment period pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087. Comments were received
and responses prepared and incorporated into the EIR. A copy of the final EIR is on file in the
Planning'Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
6. On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public hearing on the
General Plan Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Notice of the
time, place, and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in
accordance with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and 65090.
7. On September 19, and continued to October 3, 2001, and then to October 17, 2001,
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public
hearing on the General Plan Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report
(EIR). Notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-93
EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
October 17, 2001
Page 2
Valley Daily Bulletin in accordance with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and
65090.
8. The Final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this resolution consists of that
draft document dated June, 2001, entitled Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Draft
Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027), written comments on
that draft report, and written responses thereto submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, an Addendum to the EIR attached as Exhibit "A" of the September 12, 2001, staff
report of this item, and written testimony presented by City staff and the City's consultant during
the hearings on the recommended adoption of said General Plan Update insofar that the
testimony pertained to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-mentioned documents
will be referred to as "the Final fIR."
9. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The Final EIR has been reviewed and considered by the City Council, prior to
making its recommendations on the General Plan Update, and the City Council finds, pursuant
to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance
with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. The City
Council further finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192.1 and State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15084(e), that the Final EIR has been independently analyzed by City staff
and the City Council, and that the Final fIR represents and reflects the independent judgment
of the City Council with respect to the project.
2. The additional information provided in the staff report accompanying the EIR, the
Addendum to the EIR, and Response to Comments provided in Exhibit "A" to the staff report,
and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony presented at the above-mentioned
hearing does not represent significant new information so as to require re-circulation of the EIR
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192.1.
3. Based on all of the findings, evidence, and information presented, the City Council
finds, pursuant to Section 15090 of the State CEQA Guidelines, that the Final EIR has been
completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA
Guidelines, and that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192.1 and State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15084(e), that the Final EIR has been independently analyzed by the City
Council and represents and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council with respect
to the project. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR for the
2001 General Plan Update.
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
SG-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall continue to restrict land uses in the upland areas to Iow Planning
density residential use.
SG-2 The City shall continue enfomement of the Hillside Development Ordinance and Guidelines to Planning
ensure prudent development and redevelopment for all property greater than 10% in slope, and
continue to preserve property greater than 30% in slope as open space.
SG-3 The City shall require geologic engineering investigations for developments proposed in areas Engineering/Building and
! of potential geologic hazards. Safety
SG-4 The City shall require special construction features in the design of structures where site Engineering/Building and
investigations confirm the existence of geologic hazards. Safety
SG-5 The City shall'restrict development from areas with unsafe geological conditions. Planning
SG-6 The City shall continue to support mitigation of existing and private development projects Fire
located on unstable hillside areas, especially slopes with recurring failures, where City property
or public right-of-way is threatened from slope instability, or where considered appropriate and
urgent by the City Engineer, Fire, or Police Departments.
SG-7 The City shall require developers to prepare detailed foundation investigations for potentially Planning
unstable slopes so that grading and construction activities will not lead to potential slope
movement.
SG-8 The City shall establish minimum setbacks along the bluff of the Cucamonga Creek to minimize Planning
property damage, injuries, and possible loss of life from ground failure.
Exhibit A
% I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCLXG PA 99-07mlt tb110-17~)l.doc 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
ISG-9 The City shall consider enacting a geologic disaster recovery ordinance for use following severe Fire/Building and Safety
winter storms that cause extensive landslide or erosion damage.
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
SG-10 The City shall consider implementing a third party review system for geotechnical reports Building and Safety
submitted for development or redevelopment that verify and document engineering properties
associated with site materials.
SG-.ll The City shall continue to regulate the type and intensity of new development in potential Planning
seismic hazard areas.
SG-12 The City shall continue to adhere to the regulations imposed by the State for Special Studies Planning
Zones.
SC-13 The City shall establish minimum setbacks for any structure proposed for human occupancy Planning
with the Special Studies Zones, based on minimum standards established under State law as
well as recommendations of the project geologist and City Engineer.
SG-14 The City shall require geological and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or Engineering
geologic hazards as part of the environmental and developmental review process for all
structures proposed for human occupancy.
SG-15 The City shall promote strengthening of planned utilities through the Water District's Master Engineering
Plan, the retrofit and rehabilitation of existing weak structures and lifeline utilities, and the
relocation or strengthening of certain Critical Facilities to increase public safety and minimize
potential damage from seismic and geologic hazards.
SC-16 The City shall continue to encourage the retrofit of unreinforced masonry buildings and conduct Building and Safety
a program to identify other potentially hazardous buildings.
SC-17 The City shall continue to incorporate the most recent seismic safety practices into City codes Building and Safety
and project review process.
Exhibit A
~ I:~PLANN]]qG~FINA L\CITYCNC L\G P A 99-07mlt tb110-17-01.doc 2 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMO1NGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
SG-18 The City shall promote alternative project designs or Iow intensity land uses during the Planning
environmental and developmental review process in areas determined to have significant
seismic or geologic constraints.
SG-19 The City shall promote public awareness of seismic and geologic hazards within the City, and Building and Safety
support emergency preparedness.
SG-20 The City shall consider employing the following policies to minimize the impacts from windblown Building and Safety/Planning
sand:
Encourage preservation of existing wind rows (landscape buffers which reduce impacts
from windblown sand).
Require developers to plant protective landscaping on the eastern sides of proposed
projects within areas where windblown sand is a problem.
Review architectural plans for structures in terms of wind direction and velocity to reduce
potential "wind tunnel" effects.
Cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions in the reduction of windblown sand..
Suspend grading operations during high winds.
SG-21 The City shall require agricultural operations and new construction to comply with City Building and Safety
provisions for preventing soil erosion and excessive generation of dust where the property is
vulnerable to these conditions
SG-22 The city should evaluate the conservation viable agricultural operations that remain within the Planning
planning area on lands that are designated by the state as important farmland.
SG-23 The City shall maintain maps and descriptions of regionally significant aggregate resources in Planning
accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA).
~ I:kPLANNINO~FINAL\CITYCNC L\G PA 99-07mit tb110-17-01,doc 2 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RA~CItO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City DepartmentJDivision
Responsible for Monitoring
SG-24 The City shall consider the value and benefit to the community of regionally significant Planning
aggregate resources within the Planning Area prior to approving any such designated lands for
other types of development.
SG-25 In areas that the State of California has designated as regionally significant aggregate Planning
resources, the City will require property titles to include notice of the presence of such
resources, in accordance with SMARA.
SG-26 The City shall establish standards for the development, operation and reclamation of mineral Planning
extraction sites that respect adjacent land uses and provide adequate measures to protect
sensitive uses and to assure effective restoration of expended mining sites in an aesthetic
manner.
SG-27 The City shall monitor management of mineral extraction activities to reduce direct and indirect Planning
negative
ltD-1 Storm water drainage facilities will be constructed and/or appropriate development impact fees Engineering
paid to ensure adequate facilities will exist to meet the surface water runoff generated by new
development.
ItD-2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to upgrade its drainage system in conjunction with Engineering
plans and funds provided by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District to provide
necessary flood control improvements.
HI)-3 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will periodically review its flood control fees to ensure Engineering
adequate funding is available to construct the City's drainage system.
~ I:kPLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit ~b110-17-01,d~: 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
HD-4 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall attempt to maintain and have input on the level of Planning
development intensity and current conservation practices within the City's Sphere of Influence
and the San Bernardino National Forest.
HD-5 During the construction and operation of new development the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Planning
require the implementation of best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff. This will
include, where applicable, the preparation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Programs
(SWPPPs) to control runoff from construction sites.
HD-6 The City will promote programs to protect water quality and to conserve water supplies in Engineering
coordination with the Cucamonga County Water District.
HD-7 The City will promote protection of natural stream courses in the Planning Area from erosion Planning/Engineering
and pollution from urban runoff.
HD-8 During the construction and operation of new development the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Engineering
implement best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the
groundwater basin. This will include, where applicable, the preparation of Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Programs ($WPPPs) to control runoff from construction sites.
BR-1 A primary goal of the proposed General Plan is the identification and protection of natural Planning
resources. Toward this end, an inventory for the sphere-of-influence has been completed. The
City, in conjunction with Chaffey College and San Bernardino County, should undertake an
inventory of remaining natural areas within City limits for the purpose of retaining important
areas in their natural state. The City shall limit encroachment of development into these natural
areas that have biological significance such as the canyons in the existing sphere-of-influence
area.
BR-2 Proposed development in the riparian corridors should be restricted and permitted only after a Planning
I:~PLANN ING~FiNAL\C ITYCNCL[G PA 99-07mit fbi 10-174)l.doc 4 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
site investigation has assessed potential disturbance to plant and animal resources. All
permitted development should contain measures wherever possible to offset any impacts. The
General Plan encourages developers to use native plant material for landscaping whenever
feasible. Cutting mature native woodland trees is prohibited. Building and road construction
will be planned to minimize disturbance to plants and animals by site planning and noise, dust
and soil erosion control practices. The USACE and CDFG should be consulted with respect to
any project containing jurisdictional areas.
BR-3 The City of Rancho Cucamonga will redesignate approximately 1,000 acres of open space to a Planning
conservation use area in the Planning Area, potentially to be used for future mitigation.
BR-4 In conjunction with the County and the local colleges, while the Multiple Species Habitat Planning
Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is in progress of passage, the City may wish to establish a
biological assessment/clearinghouse to identify areas of potential impacts, especially regarding
rare or endangered species of flora and fauna.
BR-5 Areas designated as sensitive, unique or those that contain rare, threatened, or endangered Planning
species should be protected against direct or indirect impacts to biological resources. This shall
apply to all development within the streamside woodlands of Day, Deer, East Etiwanda, and
San Sevaine Canyons, and any additional freshwater marshes that are not currently protect in
the Etiwanda Preserve. The City would retain ultimate control over land use decisions within its
boundaries or sphere of influence. However, the United States Forest Service should be
informed of any proposed developments adjacent to National Forest land as it would be
responsible to monitor or administer appropriate measures.
~ I:~PLANNIN(] ~FINAL\C ITYCNC L\G p A 99-07mlt tb110-17-01 .doc 5 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
BR-6 Careful planning should be employed regarding road construction into new areas. Roads Planning
create access and increase the activity level whether the area is developed or not. Roads
should not be constructed through the streamside woodlands. The activity would remove much
of the large animal activity and resultant local air pollution would destroy cottonwoods,
sycamore and ash.
BR-7 The proposed General Plan also encourages landscaping of projects with drought-tolerant Planning
and/or fire resistant vegetation. Where possible, native materials should be used which will
help reduce the eventual loss of natural vegetation due to development. "Grove" style plantings
of trees will aid in maintaining potential habitat for birds.
BR-8 The windrows in Etiwanda, encompassing over 1,400 acres and the windrows along Hermosa Planning
Avenue north of Wilson Avenue (120 acres) should be maintained for raptor nesting and
perching. As needed, mature trees should be replaced selectively with appropriate species.
BR-9 The City requests, on an ongoing basis through County planning officials, expanded biological Planning
studies for all proposed developments within the sphere-of-influence. Requirements for the
preservation or replacement of sensitive natural areas have been used in those developments
where the owners are contemplating annexation to the City. This procedure is a direct result of
the existing and proposed General Plan policies and coordination with the MSHCP.
~-. I:XPLANNTNO W INAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 994)7mit tbl I0-17-01,doc 6 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCItO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City DepartmentJDivision
Responsible for Monitoring
BR-10 Migratory birds and raptor nests are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Planning
California Fish and Game Code. Mitigation for the taking of active nests may be accomplished
in two ways. First, prior to the commencement of tree removal during the nesting season
(February-July), ail suitable habitat should be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting
birds by a qualified biologist. If any active nests are detected, the area should be flagged and
avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. Tree removal and grading could be delayed until
after the breeding season (August-January). This could ensure that no active nests would be
disturbed. Implementation of appropriate measures would result in less than significant
impacts. In addition to avoidance measures, raptors will benefit from any restoration activities
associated within the riparian corridors and open space areas. The installation of western
sycamore (Platanus racemosa), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), and cottonwood (l~opulus
fremontit) trees will provide a heights of up to 85 feet with a dense canopies over 50 feet wide.
The native canopy will not only facilitate the needs of the red-tailed hawk; it will promote
utilization by other raptor species
BR-11 It is anticipated that small projects may be processed through the United States Army Corps of Planning
Engineers (USACE) utilizing the Nationwide Permit program. Some projects may involve more
extensive encroachment and/or filling of jurisdictional areas. It is anticipated that development
of these areas may require USACE authorization through the Individual Permit process.
Further refinement of the project and avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures may
result in a lessening of potential impacts to USACE jurisdictional areas.
I:~PLANNINGWINAL\CITYCNCL~GPA 99-07mit tbl lO-17-OLdoe 7 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCItO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
BR-12 In connection with notification to the USACE under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Planning
pursuant to 33 CFR Part 330, Appendix A, a written request for Section 401 water quality
certification must be submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to
ensure that no degradation of water quality will result from project implementation. RWQCB
certification must be issued prior to commencement of any activity that might affect quality (i.e.,
project grading). RWQCB processing of a certification request generally takes 45-60 days.
The project proponent is also required to submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) to the RWQCB prior to site grading.
BR-13 A CDFG Section 1603 agreement would be required prior to any alteration of a strearnbed or Planning
riparian habitat within CDFG jurisdiction. The 1603 permit will be obtained utilizing the project's
approved Environmental Impact Report. To ensure rapid and favorable action on a 1603
notification, mitigation measures (e.g., minimization of disturbance to existing onsite riparian
habitat and enhancement and creation of riparian habitat with the project site) should be
submitted with the notification package. CDFG processing of the 1603 agreement usually takes
30 days after receipt of a complete notification package.
BR-14 Any development that results in the potential take or substantial loss of occupied habitat for any Planning
threatened or endangered species will need to conduct formal consultation with the appropriate
regulatory agency. Consultations will be on a project by project basis and measures will be
negotiated independently for each development project.
LLT-1 Accommodate new development in a manner that enables the City's residents and businesses Planning
to readily be integrated into the social and physical structure of the City.
LU-2 Promote development that is sustainable in its use of land in relation to the impact upon natural Planning
resources, energy, air and water quality.
LU-3 Promote opportunities to develop mixed-use areas and projects in carefully selected areas. Planning
~ I:~PLANNING~FIN A L[C II~CNCL\GPA 99-07mit tbl I0-17-0 l.doc 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCItO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September S, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
LU-4 Restrict strip commercial development in favor of more focused commercial or mixed-use Planning
canters.
LU-5 Restrict the intensity of commercial concentrations at intersections, other than town center and Planning
regional canter locations, to two corners.
LU-6 In general, areas where small lot single family attached or detached development (5,200 square Planning
feet or less) would not be compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods, a lower density
should occur.
LU-7 Development densities and intensities shall be implemented within the ranges specified in the Planning
General Plan: neither higher nor lower than the limits in the range.
LU-8 i Restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where they would be threatened by natural or Planning
man made hazards.
LU-9 The industrial sector along the south edge of the City generally south of Foothill Boulevard Planning
should be protected from intrusions of other uses that could cause land use conflicts that would
weaken the long term competitive value of this area for a wide range of industrial uses.
LU-10 Heavy industrial uses shall be concentrated in the area east of the electrical power plant. Planning
LU-11 Allow medium and high density residential uses along transit routes in mixed-use areas and in Planning
the vicinity of activity centers.
TC-1 Traffic impact studies shall be required with the submittal of proposed development projects in Engineering
accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a
traffic study (where project traffic is forecasted to generate a minimum 250 two-way peak hour trips
for non-retail land uses, or 1,000 two-way trips for retail land uses).
I:~ LANN ING~FINAL\C ITYCNC L\G PA 99-07mit tb110-17-01 .doc 9 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September S, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
TC-2 Intersections that are forecasted to operate at LOS D or worse, as identified in the traffic study, Engineering
shall require analysis for both interim and future conditions. These priority intersections shall be
identified in the traffic studies prepared for proposed development which contribute 80 or more
two-way peak hour trips to ensure that they are operating adequately.
TC-3 Applicants for future developments shall prepare, at the City's discretion, site-specific access Engineering
studies to determine the feasibility of proposed access locations
TC-4 The City shall ensure sufficient right of way is reserved at critical intersections to implement the Engineering
approach lane geometrica necessary to provide the levels of services, as noted within the traffic
study.
TC-5 The City shall continue to implement an annual traffic monitoring program to ensure that funds Engineering/
from developers and/or area-wide fee programs are appropriately targeted to ongoing circulation
needs.
TC-6 The City shall adopt all recommended changes to the General Plan Circulation roadway Planning
classifications, as noted within the traffic study, in order to accommodate projected traffic increases
and to insure that improvements specified are implemented.
TC-7 The City will construct the 6th StreetJl-15 interchange to allow vehicles to use an alternate means of Engineering
accessing the 1-15, and thereby reduce the impacts to the areas surrounding other freeway
accessible locations.
TC-8 Additional Improvements will be required'beyond that necessary for typical roadway standards, as Engineering
defined in the proposed general Plan, for the 11 intersections listed below to ensure that
intersections operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better.
Intersection (LOS is noted for AM/PM)
~ I:~PLANNINGh~rlNAL[CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mlt tb110-17-01,doc 10 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route (C, D)
1-15 SB Ramps and Baseline Road (D, C)
1-15 NB Ramps and Baseline Road (B, D)
Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (D, D)
Milliken Avenue and Ontario Mills Parkway (D, D)
Rochester Avenue and 6t' Street (D, D)
1-15 SB Ramps and 4t' Street (D, D)
1-15 SB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (B, El)
1-15 NB Ramps and Foothill Boulevard (C, C)
Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route (D, D)
Milliken Avenue and SR-30 WB Ramps (C, B)
TC-9 The City will allow the following 7 intersections to operate at a LOS E or better. Engineering
19th Street (SR-30) and Carnelian Street (E, E)
Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue (C, E)
Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue (E, D)
Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route (D, E)
Milliken Avenue and 4tn Street (D, E)
Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street/San Bernardino Avenue (D, E)
East and Foothill Boulevard (E, D)
I:XP LANNING'a':INAL\C ITYCNCL~G pA 99-07mit tb] 10-17-0Ldoc I 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
AQ-1 All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce Engineering
operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained as per the manufacture's specification. Maintenance records shall be
available at the construction site for City verification.
AQ-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, all applicants shall submit construction plans to Planning
City of Rancho Cucamonga denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.
Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction
equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the
project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the
SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff.
AQ-3 All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule Planning
1113. Paints and coating shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-pressure spray.
AQ-4 All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Planning
AQ-5 All construction shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally contractors shall Planning
include the following provisions:
Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering.
Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods
of time.
Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the
end of work periods.
Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound
engineering practices.
,~ 15PLANNINGWINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07fait tb110-I 7-01.do¢ 12 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
Sweep streets as necessary if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs
as a result of hauling.
Suspend grading operations during high winds in accordance with Rule 403 requirements.
Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using
tarps or other suitable means.
AQ-6 All "large;scale" project applicants shall provide incentives to use mass transit including the Engineering
placement of bus stop shelters along major thoroughfares if not so equipped. (City Staff shall
determine what denotes a "large-scale" project.)
AQ-7 All "large-scale" project applicants shall incorporate a bike/walking path between these shelters, Engineering
the proposed residential areas, and the proposed commercial areas. These paths shall be lit
and configured so as to avoid potential conflict with roadways and railroad activities.
AQ-8 All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling Engineering
for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes).
AQ-9 The City shall require that both industrial and commercial uses designate preferential parking Engineering
for vanpools.
AQ-10 The proposed commercial areas shall incorporate food service. Engineering
AQ-11 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post Engineering
both bus and MetroLink schedules in conspicuous areas.
AQ-12 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 of more employees shall be requested to Engineering
configure their operating schedules around the MetroLink schedule to the extent reasonably
feasible.
{~ I:~PLANNINO~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 994)7mit tbl 10-17-01 .doc 13 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
AO-]3 All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow Building and Safety
polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters.
AQ-/4 All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows Building and Safety
and weather-stripping.
AQ-]5 All residential, commercial, and industrial structures shall be required to incorporate light Planning/Building and Safety
colored roofing materials.
N-1 Pdor to the issuance of any grading plans, the City shall condition approve of subdivisions that Planning
are adjacent to any developed/occupied noise sensitive land uses by requiring applicants to
submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The
plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this
equipment will be mitigated during construction of the project through the use of such methods
as:
Temporary noise attenuation fences,
Preferential location of equipment, and
Use of current technology and noise suppression equipment.
While the methods described above will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction
equipment, they do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction
materials and debris. The following measures shall then be required of any proposed
development.
% I:XPLANNINGWINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit tbl 10-17-0 l.doc 14 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
N-2 The construction-related noise mitigation plan required as part of the previous noise mitigation Planning
measure shall specify that haul truck deliveries be subject to the same hours specified for
construction equipment (i.e., Monday through Saturday, 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and not
allowed on Sundays and national holidays). Additionally, the plan shall denote any construction
traffic haul routes where heavy trucks would exceed 100 daily trips (counting those both to and
from the construction site). To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not
pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Lastly, the construction-related noise
mitigation plan shall incorporate any other restrictions imposed by City staff.
N-3 Applicants for new proposed land uses shall specify increased setbacks such that land uses do Planning
not lie within the 65 dBA CNEL oveday zone for commercial office and sensitive uses (60 dBA
CNEL for residential uses) depicted in Exhibit 5.7-3. This would ensure that any proposed land
uses do not exceed the goals of the City General Plan Noise Element. If increased setbacks
are not provided, an applicant may implement the following.
Prior to development, a developer shall contract for a site-specific noise study for the specific
site project. The noise study shall be performed by an acoustic consultant experienced in such
studies and the consultant's qualifications and methodology to be used in the study must be
presented to City staff for consideration.
The acoustic consultant shall then prepare a site-specific noise study for the site under
consideration. At a minimum, the study shall include an evaluation of the existing setting based
on both field measurements and noise modeling. Field measurements are to be project-specific
in that they will include measurements at those locations where the most sensitive uses are to
be placed in elevated noise area (e.g., nearest dwellings, or reoms to the roadway or freeway).
Measurements shall be obtained using a certified Type 1 or 2 integrating sound level meter and
shall be of sufficient duration to accurately quantify ambient noise levels. To the extent
feasible, roadway noise, with simultaneous traffic counts shall be obtained to document traffic-
generated noise. These measurements are to be obtained in accordance with methodolo~l¥
~ I:~LANNINGWIN A L~CITYCNCL\G P A 99o07mlt tb110-I 7411.do¢ 15 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
prescribed by Caltrans and/or FHWA.
Using the obtained traffic noise data, the study shall then project year 2020 traffic volume noise
impacts at the project site and any noted sensitive areas. The study shall also note specific
measures that will be required to reduce exterior noise levels to meet City Standards. Such
measures could include, but are not limited to increased setback, sound walls and/or berms,
building orientation to shield more sensitive outdoor recreation areas, etc.
If the study determines that the applicant cannot reasonably mitigate exterior noise to less than
65 dBA CNEL, the study shall also include measures to assure that any interior habitable areas
do not exceed the interior noise levels included in Table 5.7-4. Any proposed residential
development that does not meet the 65 dBA CNEL exterior level with proposed mitigation shall
be so noted in the deed of trust and disclosed at the time of initial and all subsequent sales. No
residential dwellings shall be placed in areas with exterior noise levels in excess of 70 dBA
CNEL, even with the inclusion of mitigation measures.
Furthermore, if the study finds that exterior habitable areas at commercial and public use
facilities cannot meet a 70 dBA CNEL noise level, the developer shall post warning signs at any
entrances to such facilities stating such. Actual wording and placement of these signs shall be
determined in consultation with City staff.
No development permits or approval of land use applications shall be issued until an acoustic
analysis is received and approved by the City Planning Department.
N-4 Potential Impacts of Stationary-Source Noise from Planned Industrial Uses Planning
No industrial facilities shall be constructed within 500 feet of any commercial land uses or 2,800
feet of any residential land uses without the preparation of a noise analysis. This analysis shall
document the nature of the industrial facility as well as "noise producing" operations associated
with that facility. Furthermore, the analysis shall document the placement of an)/existin~l or
I:~PLANNING~FINAL\C ITYCNC L[G PA 99-07mit tb110-17-01.do: 16 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
proposed commercial or residential land uses situated within the noted distances. The analysis
shall determine the potential noise levels that could be received at these commercial and/or
residential land uses and specify very specific measures to be employed by the industrial facility
to ensure that these levels do not exceed City noise requirements presented in Table 5.7-4 in
Section 5.7.1. Such measures could include, but are not limited to, the use of enclosures for:
noisy pieces of equipment, the use of noise walls and or berms for exterior equipment and/or
on-site truck operations, and/or restrictions on hours of operations. No development permits or
approval of land use applications shall be issued until an acoustic analysis is received and
approved by the City staff.
P-I The City shall continue to adequately fund police services through the collection of taxes, Finance
grants, and development related funding sources.
P-2 The City shall regularly evaluate its crime prevention programs and make adjustments as Police
needed to respond to the changing needs of the community.
P-3 The City shall ensure that an average five-minute response time is maintained for emergency Police t
calls, and maintain and improve, where feasible, response times for calls to service.
P-4 The City shall encourage the use of physical site planning (CPTED-Crime Prevention Thorough Planning/Police
Environmental Design) as an effective means of preventing crime. Developers should design
structures, access systems, open spaces, parking lots, paths, play areas, and other public
spaces to contribute to an overall sense of security and lack of vulnerability to crime
opportunity.
P-5 The City shall promote the design of developments that provide maximum visibility approaches Planning
to, from, and within the property by vehicles and particularly by pedestrians.
~ I:~LANNI~NG~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99~7mit tbl I 0-17-0 I.doc 17 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
P-6 Promote the management and maintenance of project areas so that the crime prevention Planning/Police
features originally designated into the project remain operational.
P-7 Proposed developments, to the extent possible, shall attempt to provide physical structures Planning/Ploice
where the inhabitants will be given an opportunity and the means to extend their use and
sphere of responsibility beyond their front doom. The premise of this measure is that the
inhabitants will be more concerned with an expanded area if that area is designed to appear as
part of his territory. Possible techniques for expanding an inhabitant's territory include:
Cluster buildings and choose building types to reduce the number of households sharing a
common entryway.
Position buildings and their entries to promote the feeling that streets are an extension of
the residenrs territory. -~
Place amenities such as recreational areas, open areas and vegetation within areas defined
for the use of particular inhabitants.
Mix the private grounds of individual units with adjacent areas.
P-8 The City shall continue to promote the establishment of neighborhood watch programs for Police
residential areas aimed at encouraging neighborhoods to form associations to patrol or watch
for any suspicious activity.
P-9 The City shall promote the establishment of crime prevention programs for commercial and Police
industrial areas.
P-lO The City shall encourage the continuation of volunteer forces; (e.g., reserves and citizen patrol) Police
to assist with police duty.
FS-1 The City shall continue to support the reduction of the Urban Wildland threat through the Fire/Planning
~ I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\G pA 994)Trait tb110-174)1 .doe 1 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonsa General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
following means:
Fire prevention.
Public education.
Emergency Preparedness
Code Compliance.
Internal fire sprinklers.
Adequate vegetation modification and reduction.
Adequate water supplies.
Improved ingress and egress to development.
Provision of an adequately located, staffed, equipped, and complement of Fire District
stations.
FS-2 The City shall continue to support adequate funding of the Fire District. Fire/Finance
FS-3 The City shall continue to support the maintenance of a well-equipped and staffed Fire District, Fire
providing a high level of service to all natural or technical hazards of fire, emergency medical,
and hazardous materials emergencies.
FS-4 The City shall continue to support the provision of adequate fire flows throughout the City and Fire
the provision of adequate water storage to meet peak fire demand during times of peak
domestic demand and during catastrophic events.
FS-5 The Fire District shall continue to review landscape plans to ensure that projects contain the Fire
proper use of fire resistant, drought-tolerant vegetation and adequate open space buffers within
the high fire hazard areas.
~ I:~PLANNING~INAL\CITYCNCL\GP A 99-07mit [bi 10-17-o1.a0¢ 19 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
FS-6 The city shall regularly review and clarify emergency evacuation plans for dam failure, Fire/Police/Engineering
inundation, fire and hazardous materials releases.
FS-7 The following mitigation shall be used to minimize the incidence of fire outbreaks and prevent Firet
its spread, thereby limiting damage to life and property:
Fire fuel within high-risk fire areas shall be managed and controlled.
A greenbelt or cultivated fuel break shall be provided between high fire risk areas and other
areas less prone to fire hazards.
Building materials shall conform to the standards contained in the Uniform Building and Fire
Codes.
Development shall allow and accommodate access by emergency vehicles.
Support a fire protection delivery system that can confine a structural fire, such as a fire in a
residence, to the room of origin and to where the occupants can be rescued.
FS-8 : On a project specific level, the following mitigation shall be used: Fire
Project applicants shall pay their fair share toward the construction of new fire stations and
provision of fire department personnel to serve their project prior to issuance of building
permits. Development impact fees shall be evaluated as necessary to ensure adequate
funds are collected to meet established service levels.
Project applicants shall submit emergency fire access plans to the Fire Department for
review and approval to assure that service to their site is in accordance with Rancho
Cucamonga Fire District requirements prior to the approval of grading plans.
Project applicants shall install fire hydrants in accordance with City approved building plans
prior to commencement of structural framing.
Proiect applicants shall demonstrate to the Fire District that the onsite water supply system
~ I:~PLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\G PA 99-07mit tb110-17-01 .doc 20 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
is designed to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage in accordance with City Fire
District requirements prior to the approval of street improvement plans.
Project applicants for large structures shall be required to install automatic sprinkler
systems.
FS-9 Implement updated Five-year Strategic Plan. Fire
W-1 The City shall coordinate with the Cucamonga County Water District and Inland Empire Utilities Engineering
Agency to ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities are available to meet future
growth.
W-2 Development in areas suitable for groundwater replenishment should be clustered to promote Engineering
infiltration and to maintain areas of open space.
W-3 Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site should be integrated into the design of the Engineering
development where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to
enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces,
diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins.
W-4 The City shall continue to support the Cucamonga County Water District's efforts to develop the Engineering
canyon water supply and to encourage water conservation. Water conservation techniques
appropriate for new and existing development include:
Installing flow restrictors in showers.
Repairing leaky water fixtures.
Promoting drought resistant Iow maintenance vegetation.
~ I :XPLANNINGXFIN AL\C [TYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit tbl IO-l%01.doe 21 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
W-5 The City shall cooperate with efforts of the Cucamonga County Water District to expand the re- Engineering
use of wastewater for such uses as the irrigation of parkways, golf courses, landscaped areas,
and parks, and, if feasible, for industrial processes.
W-6 The City shall implement applicable provisions of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Engineering
System (NPDES) for municipal and private projects to protect ground water recharge areas
from construction and other potential pollutant runoff.
W~V-1 The City shall coordinate with the Inland Empire Utility Agency and Cucamonga County Water Engineering/Planning
District to ensure that adequate wastewater facilities are available to meet future growth.
SW-1 The City shall continue to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Engineering
SW-2 The City shall coordinate with the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino Association of Engineering/Planning
Governments, and solid waste haulers to ensure adequate services and facilities are available
within and outside the County to collect and dispose of solid waste.
NG-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall provide population projections to The Gas Company to Planning
ensure they have adequate information upon which to project natural gas demands.
NG-2 The City shall coordinate with The Gas Company to ensure adequate services and facilities are Engineering/Planning
available to provide for future development.
ES-I The City will promote and pursue strategies to decrease dependence on imported non- Engineering
renewable energy resources.
ES-2 The City will promote energy efficiency and renewable energy resources. Engineering
I:kPLANNINGkF1NAL\CITYCNCL~GPA 99-07mit tb110-17-01.doc 22 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCItO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
ES-3 The City shall initiate and promote measures into land use and circulation planning that will Engineering/Planning
contribute to the reduction of operational energy requirements.
ES-4 The City shall review existing land use and zoning regulations to assess and identify further Engineering/Planning
opportunities for energy conserving measures, including development of an infrastructure to
support the use of alternative fuel.
ES-5 The City will establish and coordinate energy efficiency programs to assist residential users. Engineering
ES-6 The City will promote energy efficient design in all projects. Engineering/Planning/Building
and Safety
ES-7 The City will promote integration of energy efficient programs in all types of commercial Engineering/Planning/Building
development projects, and Safety
ES-8 The City will promote energy efficient technology in the industrial sector wherever possible. Engineering/Planning/Building
and Safety
ES-9 The City shall continue pursing strategies to promote a balance of housing and employment Planning
opportunities within the City and surrounding region.
ES-10 The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall provide population projections to Southern California Planning
Edison to ensure they have adequate information upon which to project electricity demands.
ES-11 The City shall coordinate with SCE to ensure adequate services and facilities are available to Engineering/Planning/Building
provide for future development, and Safety
S-t The City shall continue to require school districts to verify collection of appropriate school fees Planning
prior to issuance of building permits.
~ I:~LANNINGWiNAL\CITYCNC LXG PA 99-07mit tb110-17-01.do¢ 23 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
$-2 The City shall support requests by local school districts for state and federal funding to meet an Planning
increasing student population.
S-3 The City shall continue to support state legislation allowing the construction of school facilities Community Development
through special assessment districts.
S-4 The City shall explore means by which development that indirectly creates the need for more Planning
schools (e.g., development which creates substantial job opportunities that in turn creates the
demand for local housing, which in turn creates the need for schools) shall contribute to
meeting these needs.
LS-1 The City will provide a minimum of 15,500 square feet of library space within the Planning Area Planning
to serve future residents.
PR-1 The City shall rely upon the Recreation Needs and System Recommendations Study as the Community Services
basis for acquiring parkland, applying park standards, preparing individual park improvement
plans, prioritizing park development projects, upgrading existing facilities, and conducting
recreation programs and services.
PR-2 The City shall require developers of residential projects to dedicate land and/or pay in-lieu fees Engineering
in accordance with its City's Local Park Ordinance (Ordinance No. 105).
PR-3 The City shall require parkland improvements and facilities to be made by the developer in Engineering
developer-dedicated neighborhood parks, other than improvements of a specialized nature
(e.g., recreation buildings) as determined by the Community Services Director.
PR-4 The City shall continue to pursue additional funding sources for parkland acquisition and Community Services
improvements. /Engineering
~' l :~LANNINGWINAL~C ITYCNCL\GP A 99-07mit tb110-17-0Ldoc 24 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
PR-5 The City shall pursue the joint use of public lands that are available and suitable for recreation Community Services
purposes, including flood control district, water district, and other utility properties. /Engineering
PR-6 The City shall seek to expand joint use agreements with school districts for recreation and Community Services
community service programs. /Engineering
PR-7 The City will encourage and actively support the development of public park improvements at Community Services
the regional and state levels, which will help to meet recreational demands of the City residents. /Engineering
PR-8 The City will rely on the Trails Implementation Plan as the basis for the application of trail Planning/Engineering
standards and design guidelines, prioritizing new trail development projects, and upgrading
existing trail facilities.
PR-9 The City shall continue to allow trailway acreage to be credited towards meeting parkland Planning/Engineering
dedication standards.
PR-10 The City shall pursue the development of trails and facilities for equestrian use within the Planning
Equestrian/Rural Area designation, as shown on the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan.
PR-11 The City shall continue to pursue improvements to existing trails such as removing barriers, Planning/Engineering
improving safety and function, and providing access to adjacent trails.
PR-12 The City shall continue to implement and maintain joint-use agreements with public and private Planning/Engineering
utilities for the use and maintenance of utility corridors for trail purposes.
AES-1 Preserve and enhance the special qualities of existing districts and neighborhoods through Planning
focused attention on land use, community design, and economic development.
~ I:kPLANNING~FINAL\CITYCNC L\G PA 99-07mlt tb110-17-01.doe 25 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
AES-2 Continue to promote the establishment of entry monumentation as a means of stimulating Planning/Engineering
community, district and neighborhood identity.
AES-3 Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's comprehensive design guidelines for Planning
residential, commercial, and industrial development.
AES-4 Provide transition between the developed and natural (unbuilt) environment through Planning
landscaping techniques, open space linkages, preservation and landforms, and sensitive site
planning and architectural design.
AES-5 Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong landscaped edge, provides a Planning/Engineering
coherent high-quality appearance along a particular route, and enhances the image of adjacent
development.
AES-6 Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities wherever feasible to Planning/Engineering
minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures.
AES-7 Ensure that communication towers are located and designed to blend with the surrounding Planning/Engineering
environment.
AES-8 Maintain the rural development pattern and character of the Etiwanda area through the Planning
Etiwanda Specific Plan.
AES-9 Develop mixed use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there is sensitive integration Planning
of land uses, convenient modes of transportation, and a focused "sense of place" that
emanates from the architectural and landscape design.
I:WLANNINGWIN A L\CITYCNCL~G PA 99-07mit tbl 10-17-01 .doc 26 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
AES-10 On north-south roadways, open space corridors, and other locations where there are views of Planning/Engineering
scenic resources, trees and structures should be used to frame and orient such views as key
locations, and obstruction of views should be kept to a minimum.
AES-11 Seek the preservation of existing windrows, vineyards, and citrus groves where feasible and the Planning
re-establishment of these special landscape elements within the City.
~ I:~LANNING~FINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit tbl lO-17-Ol.doc 27 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
CR-1 It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following tasks prior to Planning
construction activities on any part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-
influence:
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for prehistoric
resources, a field survey for prehistoric resources within portions of the project area not
previously surveyed for cultural resources shall be conducted.
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for sacred land
resources, the Native American Heritage Commission for information regarding sacred
lands.
Inventory all prehistoric resources using appropriate State record forms and submit two (2)
copies of the completed forms to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information
Center.
Evaluate the significance and integrity of all prehistoric resources within the project area,
using criteria established in Appendix K of the CEQA Guidelines for important
archaeological resources.
If human remains are encountered on the project site, the San Bernardino County Coroner's
Office shall be contacted within 24 hours of the find, and all work should be halted until a
clearance is given by that office and any other involved agencies.
All resources and data collected within the project area should be permanently curated at
an appropriate repository within the County.
CR-2 If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the Planning
developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take
appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the
archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
Enact interim measures to protect undesi~lnated sites from demolition or si~lnificant
~ I:~PLANNINGXleINAL\CITYCNC L\G PA 99~7~it tb~ ~0-~ 7-0~.aoc 28 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM {Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLA/~ UPDATE
{September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value.
Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new
developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point.
Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage.
Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditional of approval (if a local government
action) to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric
resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines.
Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation,
and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the
completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological
Information Center for permanent archiving.
CR-3 Historic Archaeolo.qical Resources Planning
It is recommended that a qualified archaeologist perform the following tasks prior to
construction activities on any part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-
influence:
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic
resources, a field survey for historical resources within portions of the project area not
previously surveyed for cultural resources shall be conducted.
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for historic
resources, the San Bemardino County Archives shall be contacted for information on
historical property records.
Subsequent to a preliminary City review, if evidence suggests the potential for sacred land
resources, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted for information
regarding sacred lands.
~.~ I:XPLANNINGXFINAL\C ITYCNCL\GPA 99-07mit tb110-174)1 .doe 29
Mitigation
Monitoring
Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
Inventory all historical resources, including archaeological and historic resources older than
50 years, using appropriate State record forms and following guidelines in the California
Office of Historic Preservation's handbook "Instructions for Recording Historical Resources".
The amhaeologist will then submit two (2) copies of the completed forms to the San
Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for the assignment of trinomials.
Evaluate the significance and integrity of all historical resources within the project area,
using criteria established in Appendix K of the CEQ^ Guidelines for important
archaeological resources and/or 36 CFR 60.4 for eligibility for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places.
Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditional of approval (if a local government
action) to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique historical
resources, following appropriate CEQA and/or National Historic Preservation Act's Section
106 guidelines.
Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation,
and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area, following guidelines for
Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic
Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a), December 1989. Submit one copy of the
completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological
Information Center for permanent archiving.
~- I:~PLANNINGWINAL\CITYCNCL\GPA 994~7mit tb110-17-01.doc 30 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
CR-4 If any historical resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a Planning
qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities and to take appropriate measures to
protect or preserve them for study. In addition, the City of Rancho Cucamonga should:
Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant
modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its historic value.
Continue to implement the Landmark Designation Program and other programs that support
conservation of historical resources. Continue to require, where appropriate, the
incorporation of historic sites and buildings within new developments, using their special
qualities as a theme or focal point.
Vigorously encourage the use of the State Historic Building Code on buildings of historic
significance that can allow modification without imposing some of the potentially detrimental
provisions of the current building codes.
Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage.
CR-5 Paleontolo.qical Resources Planning
It is recommended that a qualified paleontologist conduct a preconstruction field survey of any
project site with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-influence that is underlain by
Quaternary alluvium. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide
specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological
monitoring) that may be appropriate.
I:~PLANNINGX, F INAL\CITYCNCL\GP A 99-07mit tb110-17-01 .doc 31 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Cont.)
FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(September 5, 2001)
Mitigation Measures City Department/Division
Responsible for Monitoring
CR-6 Should mitigation monitoring be recommended for a specific project within the area, the Planning
program must include but not be limited to the following measures:
Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils
with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing
activities.
Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing
activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage, if construction personnel
make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify
the monitor of the find.
Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report
and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum).
Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with
copy of report to San Bernardino County Museum.
HMC-1 The City shall continue to support the County of San Bernardino's management of the Fire
Hazardous Materials Disclosure Program (HMDP) to identify and regulate businesses handling
extremely hazardous materials, or hazardous materials within regulated quantities.
HMC-2 The City shall continue to maintain and implement the Household Hazardous Waste Element, in Fire
accordance with State law, to provide handling and emergency response services for
household hazardous waste.
HMC-3 The City shall continue to participate in the County-wide National Pollutant Discharge Engineering
Elimination System (NPDES) program to address storm water runoff, pollution prevention, and
illegal discharge of waste into storm drains in the community.
I:XPLANNINGXFINAL\CITYCNCLXGPA 99-07mit tb110-17-01,doc 32 Mitigation Monitoring Program
THE CITY OF
I~A N C I~ 0 ClJCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Very Low Residential Distdct lot
development standards, and to amend the Hillside Development grading standards, to facilitate
horse keeping. Related File: DRC2001-00549.
CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549 - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Very Low and Estate Residential
Districts lot basic development standards to facilitate home keeping. Related File: Development
Code Amendment DRC2001-00505.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval.
BACKGROUND:
On August 8, 2001, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to initiate this amendment to facilitate home
keeping in the Equestrian Rural Oveday District. The Alta Loma Riding Club (ALRC) has testified on recent
subdivisions to express their concerns that the proposed lots and house plotting was not conducive to home
keeping. As requested by the Planning Commission, staff met with the ALRC to discuss their concerns. The
ALRC conducted a survey of lots throughout the Equestrian/Rural Area that they believe work well for
keeping horses. Itwas concluded that the two most important factors affecting the ability of a property owner
to keep homes are the rear yard setback and the lot depth. This is particularly evident in hillside areas where
the rear yard typically includes a slope to take up grade between lots.
ANALYSIS:
The City's General Plan designates the area generally north of Banyan Avenue in the Alta Loma area on the
west side of the City and extending south to Route 30 in the east side of the City in the Etiwanda area as
Equestrian/Rural areas for the expressed purpose of "keeping and protection of animals on private property,
including equine, bovine, cleft-hoofed animals, and poultry." To implement this policy, the Development Code
established an Equestrian/Rural Overlay Distdct and created regulations for keeping animals. There are two
important requirements for home keeping: 1) A minimum 20,000 square foot lot area, and 2) Homes shall "be
kept a minimum distance of 70 feet from any adjacent dwelling, school, hospital, or church located on an
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549
October 17, 2001
Page 2
adjoining site." The location of corrals, fenced enclosures, barns, stables, or other enclosures used to
confine horses shall conform to this requirement.
Most of the Equestrian/Rural Area within the Alta Loma area is zoned Very Low Residential, which has a 150-
foot minimum lot depth and a 30-foot minimum setback from the rear prepedy line. Similarly, most of the
Equestrian/Rural Area found in the Etiwanda area is zoned Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre)
and Estate Residential (up to I dwelling unit per acre), which have a 135-foot minimum lot depth and a 30-
foot minimum setback (40-foot in Estate Residential) from the rear property line. In recent years, the trend
has been larger homes, oftentimes without increasing lot size; hence, foming horses to be kept in a 30-foot
rear yard. From a practical standpoint, the 70-foot separation requirement can result in the only allowable
corral/stable location adjoining the house. The amendments propose to increase the minimum lot depth to
200 feet and increase the rear yard setback to 60 feet. The increase in lot depth is necessary to increase the
rear yard setback. Also, minor changes to the Hillside Development regulations are recommended to
facilitate corral construction.
TRAILS ADVISORY COMMI'I-FEE:
The Committee reviewed the proposed amendments on August 8, 2001, and recommended approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff has reviewed the proposed amendments in accordance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated and determined that it is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061.
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, with a one-eighth-
page advertisement.
City Planner
BB:DC/Is
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Alta Loma Riding Club, dated July 17, 2001
Exhibit "B" - Illustration for Development Code Amendment
Exhibit "C" - Illustration for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-84 Recommending Approval of
DRC2001-00505
Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-87 Recommending Approval of
DRC2001-00549
Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505
Ordinance Approving Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549
CITY ~[RANCHO CUCAIVlui~GA
JUL 17 2001'
At"iA 1,01V[.A. I IDING OLT. TB RECEIVED- PLANNING
£0. Box H6
A~ta Loma, CA 9~?01
July 17, 2001
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ATTN: Brad Bullet, Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Bullet,
I am writing you on behalf of the members of the Alta Loma Riding Club. We want to
make known our recommendations to change some of the existing rules regarding the
development of property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As you are probably
aware, our concerns were raised as a result of several recent developments in the
equestrian zoned area of our city. It became apparent to us that the plans proposed by
builders today have changed. The trend is to build larger homes than were traditionally
built on half-acre lots, in the past. The builders have found ways to meet the current
rules and requirements, without leaving enough space in the rear yards with slopes to
comfortably and reasonably house horses.
As suggested by the Planning Commission, members of our Club met with
representatives of your office to review tbe current rules and requirements. We visited
existing developed horse properties, with varying degrees of slope, that we felt were well
planned and functional. We then compared the dimensions of the lots, the homes,
equestrian facilities and other features of those properties with recently planned and/or
developed properties.
We have identified and request changes on two existing rules/requirements. The first, is
the current minimum lot depth of 150 ft. We found that minimum depth to be too small,
particularly when the property has slopes. Our recommendation is to increase the
minimum depth required to 200 ft. This will give homeowners more options when
developing properties with slopes, and allow for better functional equestrian use. The
second change we request is to increase the existing rear yard setback, of 30 ft. We
believe that a setback of 60 feet will better meet the needs of homeowners in the
rural/equestrian overlay area-
We wish to thank Dan Coleman and Larry Henderson, of the planning department, for
their time and work in reviewing these matters. Their knowledge and assistance was
instrumental in identifying the above recommendalions. Most importantly, we want to
thank the City for it's responsiveness to the concerns of its citizens and its commitment
to the vision of development as stated in our general plan~
Sincerely,
Carol Douglass,
Alta Loma Riding Club, City Liaison
P. O. Box 116
AltaLoma, CA 91701
cc: Dan Coleman
Larry Henderson
Vicky Vau tum
RESOLUTION NO. 01-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505, AMENDING LOT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT AND HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRC2001-00505, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 12, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the Ver~ Low Residential District
and Equestrian/Rural Overlay District; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development code;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-84
DCA DRC2001-0505 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 12, 2001
Page 2
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505
by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Chairman
ATTEST:
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 12th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY
RESOLUTION NO. 01-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549, AMENDING
LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment DRC2001-00549, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on September 26, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the Very Low Residential District
and Equestrian/Rural Overlay District; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan Amendment; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-87
ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF P~NCHO CUCAMONGA
September 26, 2001
Page 2
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2001-00549 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The Secreta~ to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
[any .~_~e, hairman
ATTEST:
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DR02001-00505, AMENDING LOT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
PERTAINING TO HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORTTHEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRC2001-00505, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 12, 2001, the Planning Commission, after conducting a duly noticed
public hearing and concluding said hearing on that date, adopted Resolution No. 01-84,
recommending approval of said applicetion to the City Council.
3. On October 17, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the applicafion and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 17, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCADRC2001-00505 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 17, 2001 ....
Page 2
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505, by the adoption of
the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Zll '
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 08.040
B. Basic Development Standards. Table 17.08.040-B sets forth minimum development
standards for residential development projects filed up to the mid-point of the
permitted density range.
Table 17.08.040-B - Basic Development Standards
VL L LM M MH H
Lot Area:
Minimum Net Average 22,500 8,000 6,000 3 ac(L) 3 ac® 3 ac(L)
Minimum Net 20,000 7,200 5,000 3 ac(L) 3 ac(L) 3 ac(L)
Number of Dwelling Units('")
(Permitted Per Acre) Up to 2 Up to 4 Up to 6 Up to 11 Up to 19 Up to 27
Minimum Dwelling Unit Size:~u
Single Family Attached & 1,000 square feet~H) regardless of distdct
Detached Dwellings
Multiple Family Dwellings(~)
Efficiency/Studio 550 square feet regardless of district
One Bedroom 650 square feet regardless of distdct
Two Bedroom 800 square feet regardless of distdct
Three or More Bedrooms 950 square feet regardless of district
Lot Dimensions 90 Avg. 65 Avg. 50 Avg.
Minimum Width Vary +/- Vary +/- 5 Vary +/- N/R N/R N/R
(@ Required Front Setback) 10 5
Minimum Corner Lot Width 100 70 50 N/R N/R N/R
Minimum Depth 200 450 100 90 N/R N/R N/R
Minimum Frontage at Front
Property Line 50 40 30 100 100 100
Minimum Flag Lot Frontage 30 20 20 50 50 50
(@ Front Property Line)
Setbacks:(B)(u) 42 Avg. 32 Avg.
Front Yard(c) (E) Vary +/- 37 Avg. Vary +/- 37 Avg. N/R N/R
Vary +/- 5 Vary +/- 5
5 5
Comer Side Yard 27 27 22 27 N/R N/R
Intedor Side Yard 10/15 5/10 5/10 10(D) N/R N/R
Rear Yard 60 30 20 15 10® N/R N/R
At Interior Site Boundary 30/5 20/5 15/5 15/5® 15/5® 15/5(0)
(Dwelling Unit/Accessory Building)
Residential Building Separations (u) N/R N/R Required Per Section 17.08.040-E
I I I
EXHIBIT "A"
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.060
e. Front yard and corner side yard. No accessory structure or addition shall occupy
any portion of a required front yard or corner side yard.
B. Patio enclosures. Where required in Tables 17.08.040-B and C, private open space shall
maintain a minimum dimension of 12 feet for ground floor units, and 6 feet for upper story
units.
C. Proiections into Yards.
1. Eaves, roof projections, awnings, and similar architectural features may project into
required yards a maximum distance of 3 feet, provided such appendages are
supported only at, or behind, the building setback line.
2. Replacement chimneys, bay windows, balconies, fire escapes, exterior stairs and
landings, and similar architectural features may project into required yards a maximum
distance of 2 feet, provided such features shall be at least 3 feet from a property line.
3. Decks, platforms, uncovered porches, and landing places which do not exceed a height
of 48 inches above grade, may project into any front or corner side yard a maximum
distance of 6 feet and project into any rear or interior side yard up to the property line.
D. Proiections Above Height Limits. Flues, chimneys, elevators or other mechanical equipment,
television antennas, spires or bell towers, or similar architectural, utility, or mechanical
features, may not exceed the height limits in Tables 17.08.040-B and C more than 15 feet,
except as provided for in Section 17.08.060-1, Antennas.
E. Roofing Materials. All accessory structures, including, but not limited to, second dwelling
units, guest houses, carports, detached or attached garages, and additions to main houses
shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or imitation thereof, but not including
composition shingles. Detached accessory structures with roof cover that exceeds 120
square feet in area and/or are subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses,
shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including
composition singles. The pitch of the roof for additions and accessory structures shall be
designed to accommodate roof materials made of tile, slate, or an imitation thereof. Where
the roof material for the main house consists of wood or composition shingles; additions to
the main house, attached or detached accessory structures, and re-roofing can include the
same material. Detached accessory structures with roof cover such as patio covers,
cabanas, etc., that do not exceed 120 square feet in area and/or are not subject to public
view from streets or from adjacent land uses may use other roof materials as approved by the
City Planner. When such circumstances allow the use of composition shingles, it shall be of
architectural dimension style to create a shadow. The burden of proof for detached
accessory structures not subject to public view is on the applicant, which shall be submitted
for City Planner review and approval. Accessory structures for equestrian or agricultural uses
such as barns for keeping of horses or storing of agricultural equipment may include other
roof materials (metal) as approved by City Planner.
F. Equestrian Trails/Corrals. All new residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area
designated by the General Plan shall require local feeder trail easements for equestrian
purposes, to provide access to the rear of all lots. All non-residential development within the
Equestrian/Rural area shall require local feeder trail easements for equestrian purposes
where it is determined by the Planning Commission that such trail connections are necessary
to link residential areas with the trail system. The unobstructed access and use of said
easements shall be enforced by property owner through private deed restrictions.
Community Trails and Regional Trails shall also be provided where required by the adopted
Master Plan of Trails. Trails shall be designed per City adopted "Equestrian Trail Guidelines."
All residential lots with a minimum 20,000 square foot lot area in the Very Low
17.08-33 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.060
Residential District, Estate Residential District, and Hillside Residential District shall
be designed to accommodate a corral area in the rear yard and to grade access from
the corral to a local feeder trail. For single-family residential tracts within the
Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be constructed with a
corral.
G. Sidewalks. All new residential development shall require sidewalks as follows:
1. Within the Rural/Equestrian Area, as identified in Figure 111-7 of the General Plan,
sidewalks shall be required per city standards on one side of the following streets;
Banyan, Hillside, Wilson, Haven, Hermosa, Archibald, Amethyst, Beryl, Carnelian,
Sapphire, Turquoise, Etiwanda, East, Highland, 24th, Summit Avenues, and any other
streets that may be added that are of the same classification as the aforementioned.
For streets interior to the previously mentioned streets, sidewalks will be required on
one side of the street on routes to school as determined by the City Planner and City
Engineer with the approval by the Planning Commission.
2. All other residential areas shall require sidewalks on both sides of the street per City
Standards except for areas where a Planned Community, Etiwanda Specific Plan, or
other specific plans have established specific standards.
H. Solar Access. This section sets forth provisions for solar access. The provisions of this
section shall apply equally to all residential districts.
1. All new residential development projects, except condominium conversions, shall
provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities (e.g., lot size and
configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for
southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to
take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes).
a. Consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to lot configuration, and
to other design and improvement requirements.
$
~5~T-W~,~T To ~
17.08-34 06/99
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.24. 070
H. Trails.
1. Trails ara an integral part of a hillside area and provide recreation areas for equestrian,
hiking, and biking uses. They can also function as a means to take up grade or to
convey drainage.
In hillside areas, it is not always necessary to provide full improvements for trails. A
more natural experience may be achieved, and the amount of grading required can be
reduced, by providing minimal improvements in appropriate areas, such as
undevelopable, steep slopes.
d
I. Corrals.
Where horse keeping is allowed, the grading design should provide for corral
area of 24 feet by 24 feet within the rear yard.
Section 17.24.070 - Development Standards
Within the framework of previous design guidelines, the following standards have been prepared to
give more specific direction. These are minimum standards and shall apply to any use,
development, or alteration of land as specified in Section 17.24.020.
A. Site DesiRn.
17.24-35 6/99
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.24.070
2. Grading operations shall be planned to avoid the rainy season, October 15 to April 15.
Grading permits shall only be issued when a plan for erosion control and silt ratention
has been approved by the City Planner and Building Official, without regard to time of
year.
3. No excavation or other earth disturbance shall be permitted on any hillside area prior to
the issuance of a grading permit, with the exception of drill holes and exploratory
trenches for the collection of geologic and soil data. These trenches are to be properly
backfilled and in addition, erosion treatment provided where slopes exceed 20 percent.
4. To encourage maintenance of slopes for erosion control and aesthetics, property lines
shall be located 2 feet back from the top of slope.
= All property lines must be 2'
from the top of slope, never
~ at the toe
5. No point on any structure subject to the provisions of this Section shall be closer to a
visually prominent ridgeline than 150 feet measured horizontally on a topographic map
or 50 feet measured vertically on a cross section, whichever is more restrictive.
6. Lot padding is limited to the boundaries of the structure's foundation, ".".d a usable rear
yard area (residential only) of 15 feet adjacent to and between the structure and top or
toe of slope, and a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area. If it is physically unfeasible to
design a reasonable usable yard area due to conflict with other grading standards, then
other forms of usable open space should be considered such as: decks, patios,
balconies, or other similar forms of built structures designed to fit the natural
topography.
7. No finished slopes greater than 50 percent (2:1) may be created except beneath the
enclosed envelope of a structure where the maximum created slope is limited to 67
percent (1-1/2:1) or less.
8. Slopes within City-maintained landscape easements shall not exceed a maximum
grade of 3:1 or 33 1/3 percent.
9. Fill shall net exceed a depth of 5 feet at any point except where the Planning
Commission determines that unusual topography, soil conditions, previous grading, or
other unusual circumstances, indicate that such grading would be reasonable and
necessary.
10. Retaining walls are limited to:
a. One upslope (from the structure) not to exceed 4 feet in height. Otherwise,
terraced retaining structures shall be utilized which are separated by a minimum of
3 feet and appropriate landscaping.
17.24-44 6/99
/
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.24. 070
THIS NOT THIS
·
b. One downslope from the structure not to exceed 3 % feet in height. Where an
additional retained portion is necessary due to unusual or extreme conditions,
(such as lot configuration, steep slope, or road design) then the use of terraced
retaining structures shall be considered on an individual lot basis. Terraced walls
shall not exceed 3 feet in height and shall be separated by a minimum of 3 feet
and appropriate landscaping. Terracing is not to be used as a typical solution
within a development.
c. On lots sloping with the street, and other configurations not discussed above,
one retaining wall, not to exceed 3 ~ feet in height may be used in a side yard
where necessary (also see roadway Section 17.24.070-C).
d. Walls, which are an integral pad of the structure, may exceed 8 feet in height;
however, their visual impact shall be mitigated through contour grading and
landscape techniques.
e. On horse keeping lots, additional retaining walls, not to exceed 4 feet in
height, are allowed to provide a fiat, usable corral area and the access to
trails.
11. Cut or fill slopes shall not exceed 8 feet in height at perimeters of the site or elsewhere
without the use of walls, terracing, and other mitigating measures, such as contour
grading or landscape buffering, and then only as approved by the Planning
Commission after conclusive demonstration that such cut or fill heights will not
adversely affect adjacent properties, views, landforms, or other significant
considerations not specifically discussed here, and that they are absolutely required to
accomplish land development under extreme or unusual circumstances and
conditions.
H. Draina.qe.
1. Debris basins and energy dissipating devices shall be provided, where necessary, to
reduce erosion when grading is undertaken in the hillside areas. Natural drainage
courses shall be protected from grading activity. In instances where crossing is
required, a natural crossing and bank protection shall be preferred over steel and
17.24-44 6/99
O D,NANOE NO. d 75
AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549, AMENDING LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN,
PERTAINING TO HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan
Amendment DRC2001-00549 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission, after conducting a duly noticed
public hearing and concluding said hearing on that date, adopted Resolution No. 01-87,
recommending approval of said application to the City Council.
3. On the 17th day of October 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public hearing on October 17, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
c. The proposed amendment will further the objectives of the Equestrian/Rural
Oveday District by providing for sufficient lot depth and rear yard setback to accommodate the
keeping of horses.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 17, 2001
Page 2
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specificallyfinds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 by the adoption
of the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Etiwanda Speci~c Plan Part II, Chapter 5
BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Fig 5-2
minimum average 40~0~; 25,000 % t$~{300 10,000 ; ~J0i0~ 6,000
(in square feet)
minimum 30~000 20,000 1~. 7,200 5,000
(in square feet) ~ ~ ......
Number of DU's t~ 0,~G' 1/20,000 ~i'l(~;~ 1/7,200 1/5,000
(per lot area in square 2-raa~bt: 2 max/lot
feet) 4
max/lot
Lot Dimensions:
minimum depth ~ 100' 90'
minimum width i~ 90' 80~ 60' 60~ i: 50' min.
(at required
50% of
front setback) " lots ~ 55'
, min.
minimum frontage
40' ~ ~ 40' 30'
(at front p.I.) , ~
Setbacks: ~ .
front 30' 25' 20' avg. ~ .
side (street) ~ 25' ~5' : 25' 15'
building separation , 15' min.
, except
where
· ' adjacent
rear ~ t ~57" 20' ~O' 15'
Lot Coverage i'~2~' ~ { 25% 40% ' ~ ~ 50%
(maximum %) :
5-9 8/96
~ A N C H O C LI C ^ M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
St Report
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
SUBJECt: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION 1N EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE
PROPOSED DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ET AL. IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council
1. Consider Resolution No. 01-239, a Resolution of Necessity of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Declaring Certain Real Property Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the
Acquisition thereof in connection with the Day Creek Boulevard, et. al. Improvements Project.
2. Open and conduct a heating on the adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity,
receive from staff the evidence stated and referred to in this Report, take testimony from any
person wishing to be heard on issues A, B, C, and D below, and consider all the evidence to
determine whether to adopt the proposed Resolution, which requires a unanimous or 4/5ths vote.
3. If the City Council finds, based upon the evidence contained in and referred to in this
Report, the testimony and comments received in this heating, that the evidence warrants the
necessary findings with respect to the Resolution of Necessity, then the staff recommends that
the City Council, in the exercise of its discretion, adopt the proposed Resolution No. 01-239,
(which requires a 4/5ths vote of the entire Council) and authorize that an eminent domain
proceeding be filed to acquire certain real property interests in portions of the larger parcels
located at 12260 Highland Avenue and 12250 Summit Avenue, and fee title to the parcel located
at 12374 Summit Avenue, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, identified
respectively as Assessor's Parcel Nos.0225-161-45, 0225-101-34, and 0225-101-42 (referred to
hereafter as "subject property interests"), and are more fully described in the legal descriptions
attached to the Resolution of Necessity as Exhibits "A" through "E," which are incorporated
herein by this reference:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 01-239
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC
PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION
WITH THE PROPOSED DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ET AL. IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
DISCUSSION
The subject property interests are south for public purposes, namely for street purposes and park
purposes and all purposes necessary and convenient thereto in connection with the Day Creek
Boulevard, et al. Improvements Project ("proposed Project") pursuant to California Constitution
Article 1 Section 19, California Government Code Sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401 and
40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et seq., including but not limited
to Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610,
1240.650, and other provisions of law.
As explained more fully below, the proposed Project would require the partial acquisition of the
two larger parcels identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0225-161-45 and 0225-101-34 for
permanent roadway easements for the planned construction of Day Creek Boulevard and a
secondary residential access road and for temporary construction easements. Further, the
proposed Project would require fee title to the parcel identified as Assessor's Parcel Number
0225-101-42 for park purposes.
The legal description of the part of the larger parcel south to be acquired and identified as
Assessor's Parcel Number No. 0225-161-45 is attached as Exhibit "A" and depicted on the
sketch attached as Exhibit "A-I" and the legal description of the temporary construction is
attached as Exhibit "B" and depicted on the sketch attached as Exhibit "B" to the Resolution of
Necessity. The legal description of the part of the larger parcel sought to be acquired and
identified as Assessor's Parcel Number No. 0225-101-34 is attached as Exhibit "C" and depicted
on the map attached as Exhibit "C-I" and the legal description of the temporary construction
easement is attached as Exhibit "D" and depicted on Exhibit "D-I" to the Resolution of
Necessity. The legal description of the parcel sought to be acquired in fee and identified as
Assessor's Parcel Number 0225-101-42 is attached as Exhibit "E" and depicted on the sketch
attached as Exhibit "E-I" to the Resolution of Necessity. Said legal descriptions are
incorporated in this Staff Report by this reference. The proposed Resolution of Necessity,
Resolution No. 01-239, is included with this Staff Report. The hearing on the proposed
Resolution of Necessity has been duly noticed.
PROPOSED ACQUISITION
The proposed acquisition consists of the partial acquisition of the two larger parcels identified as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0225-161-45 and 0225-101-34 for permanent roadway easements for
the planned construction of Day Creek Boulevard and a secondary residential access road and for
temporary construction easements. The partial acquisition of the property identified as
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page 3
Assessor's Parcel Number 0225-101-34 consists of approximately 31,262 square feet for the
construction of Day Creek Boulevard, approximately 7,405 square feet for the construction of a
secondary residential street and approximately 14,375 for a temporary construction easement.
The partial acquisition of the identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 0225-161-45 consists of
approximately 34,848 square feet for the construction of Day Creek Boulevard, approximately
6,970 square feet for the construction of a secondary residential street and approximately 19,602
for a temporary construction easement. Finally, the property identified as Assessor's Parcel
Number 0225-101-42 consists of approximately 80,150 square feet. The City seeks to acquire
this parcel in fee title for park purposes and all purposes necessary or convenient thereto.
The proposed acquisition of the subject property interests are for street purposes and park
purposes and all purposes necessary or convenient thereto in connection with the proposed
Project. These street improvements are designated in and consistent with the City's General Plan
and with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The proposed Project will improve Day Creek
Boulevard, create needed secondary residential streets and create a park to serve large areas of
this growing section of Rancho Cucamonga. Recent and proposed residential construction in the
vicinity of the proposed Project makes construction of the proposed Project necessary.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
The proposed Project is consistent with and is a proposed component of the City's General Plan
and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. For example, the street improvements to Day Creek
Boulevard are shown on the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. In addition, the
General Plan shows a park in the general vicinity of the subject property interests. In adopting
Ordinance 493 on April 1, 1992, the City approved the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. In
approving the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, the City Council found that due to the anticipated
growth and increase in traffic, the public health and safety requires the improvements along Day
Creek Boulevard and several other intersections and streets in the vicinity of the subject property
interests. The traffic study relative to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan found that the planned
construction of the SR-30 freeway, which will be located just north of Highland Avenue, should
be complete under build-ont conditions by the year 2010. The design of the freeway will include
interchanges at either one or two-mile intervals through the City. Both of these designs would
include interchanges at Day Creek Boulevard. Further, the Circulation Concept of the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan found that Day Creek Boulevard would sustain the greatest traffic impact
due to the build-out of the area. Day Creek Boulevard is projected to carry around 31,000
average daily trips (ADT) at project build-out. The off-site mitigation measures of the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan included the extension of Day Creek Boulevard to meet the increased traffic
impacts.
Accordingly, the proposed Project would improve Day Creek Boulevard and create additional
secondary residential access streets consistent with both the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and
the City's General Plan. The proposed Project would also provide a park for City residents
within the floating park designation area identified on the Parks and Recreation Plan of the
City's General Plan. The proposed Project implements the Circulation and Parks and Recreation
Elements of the General Plan and the Circulation and Parks Concepts of the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan.
223
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page 4
The Etiwanda North Specific Plan furthers the public health and safety objectives of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan, specifically with respect to guiding the City's decisions on
development and traffic circulation. The General Plan, and any amendments thereto, and the
Etiwanda North Specific Plan are on file in the City Planning Department and are incorporated in
this Staff Report by this reference.
The potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were studied in connection with the
potential environmental impacts of Tentative Tract Map Nos. 14493 through 14498, 14522,
14523, 15838, and 15902 (referred to hereafter as "Tentative Tract Maps"). The construction of
the proposed Project was studied as an integral part of the Tentative Tract Maps. The County of
San Bemardino ("County") had previously certified an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR")
and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("SEIR") for the development proposed by the
Tentative Tract Maps. In November 1999, the City filed a lawsuit challenging the adequacy of
the EIR and SEIR. In June 2000, the City and County and the application of the Tentative Tract
Maps reached a settlement agreement in connection with that lawsuit. As part of that agreement,
the applicant of the Tentative Tract Maps was required to enter into a development agreement
with the City and the City was required to file an annexation application to the Local Agency
Formation Commission for annexation of this area into the City. Since then, development
proposed by the Tentative Tract Maps was annexed into the City and the City and the applicant
of the Tentative Tract Maps have entered into Development Agreement 00-02. The City
approved Development Agreement 00-02 ("development agreement"), of which the proposed
Project is a vital part, pursuant to Ordinance 631 on September 7, 2000.
In accordance with Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. and California Environmental
Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines Section 15096 and 15164, the City as a responsible agency
under CEQA for the Tentative Tract Maps development project and the lead agency for the
development agreement, prepared an addendum to EIR and SEIR previously certified by the
County to address the refinements of the Tentative Tract Maps as set forth in the development
agreement.
Specifically, the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were studied as an
integral part of the Tentative Tract Maps by the Planning Commission when it adopted
Resolution No. 00-73 on July 26, 2000. This resolution recommended the adoption of a City
Council resolution affirming the EIR and SEIR certified by the County as augmented by an
addendum prepared by an the City and adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City to enter
into Development Agreement 00-02. Pursuant to Resolution No. 00-73 and the Staff Report
dated July 26, 2000, the Planning Commission found that the Development Agreement and each
and every term and provision contained therein conform to the General Plan of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. Pursuant to Resolution No. 00-73 and pursuant to CEQA, the Planning
Commission found in considering the record as a whole, the intended Tentative Tract Map
development is compatible with the surrounding development in the area and that the EIR and
SEIR prepared and certified by the County and augmented by the addendum prepared by the
City was legally sufficient for the development proposed in the Tentative Tract Maps.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page 5
The addendum reviewed any new information of substantial importance that was not known and
could not have been known with reasonable diligence at the time the SEIR was certified. It
further examined whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, preparation of a
subsequent or supplemental EIR is required. This examination included an analysis of the
provision of Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA
Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed Tentative Tract Map development. The focus
of the examination was on whether the SEIR adequately addressed the impacts associated with
the revisions to the proposed Tentative Tract Map development and the applicable provisions of
the development agreement, which included the proposed Project. Pursuant to CEQA and
sections 15164 and 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission found that there
were no conditions that would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR and that there is no
evidence that the proposed Tentative Tract Map development would require major changes to the
SEIR. Accordingly, the Planning Commission found that the significant effects that would result
from the proposed Tentative Tract Map development have been addressed in an earlier EIR, and
that none of the determinations set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and State
CEQA Guidelines section 15162 can be established. Accordingly, the Planning Commission
determined it was proper to prepare an addendum to the SEIR.
The City Council in adopting Resolution No. 00-161 at its meeting of August 16, 2000, affirmed
the EIR and SEIR as certified by the County and as augmented by the addendum prepared by the
City as legally sufficient. The City found that based on the facts and evidence, the addendum is
the adequate further environmental analysis that is required as authorized by Section 21166 of
the Public Resources Code and section 15162 of the Guidelines and that the addendum was
completed in compliance with CEQA. The City further found that the EIR, SEIR and addendum
collectively reflect the City Council's independent judgment and analysis. The City Council
pursuant to the requirements of section 15096(h) of the Guidelines, made the required findings
under CEQA, including those required by Section 15091 of the Guidelines. The City caused a
notice of determination required by Section 15094 and Section 15096(i) of the Guidelines to be
filed as required by law. In connection with the adoption of the facts, findings and statement of
overriding considerations, the City Council incorporated the mitigation measures recommended
in the EIR and SEIR.
All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Planning Commission
Resolution No. 00-73, City Council Resolution 00-161, Ordinance 631, the EIR, SEIR,
addendum, Staff Report dated July 26, 2000 and Development Agreement 00-02, and notice of
determination was reviewed by City staff on September 26, 2001, in connection with the
proposed Amendment to the development agreement. The Staff Report to the Planning
Commission dated September 26, 2001 found that pursuant to Section 15061 (6)(3) of the CEQA
guidelines, the proposed Amendment to the development agreement was exempt from further
CEQA clearance.
Further, City staff again reviewed all environmental documents referenced above during the
week of October 8, 2001, in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and pursuant
to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public
Resources Code, staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the proposed
Project and no new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would require
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page 6
further environmental analysis. These environmental findings are the same environmental
findings for the proposed acquisition of the subject property interests.
The General Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-73,
City Council Resolution 00-161, Ordinance 631, and all environmental documentation
concerning the Tentative Tract Maps, including the EIR, SEIR, addendum to the SEIR and EIR,
notice of determination, Staff Report dated July 26, 2000 and Development Agreement 00-02 are
on file in the City Planning Department and are incorporated in this Staff Report by this
reference.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262 et seq., the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtained a
fair market appraisal of the subject property interests, set just compensation in accordance with
the appraised fair market value and extended a written offer letter to Intex Properties, Inland
Empire, L.P., owner of record of the subject property interests on September 11, 2001. A true
and correct copy of the offer letter is on file in the City Engineer's Office and is incorporated in
this Staff Report by this reference. To date, however, no negotiated purchase has been
consummated, and the schedule for the proposed Project requires that the City Council consider
the proposed Resolution of Necessity at this time. City staff is continuing its negotiations with
the record owner.
To adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, the City Council must find and determine that:
A. The public interest and necessity require the project;
B. The project is planned or located in the manner that will be compatible with the
greatest public good and least private injury;
C. The subject property interests described in the Resolution of Necessity are necessary
for the Project;
D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the
owner of record of the property sought to be acquired.
This hearing relates to Issues A, B, C, and D above.
A. The Public Interest and Necessity Require the Project
The proposed acquisition consists of the partial acquisition of the two larger parcels
identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0225-161-45 and 0225-101-34 for permanent roadway
easements for the planned construction of Day Creek Boulevard and a secondary residential
access road and for temporary construction easements. Further, the proposed Project would
require fee title to the parcel identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 0225-101-42 for park
purposes. As set forth above, the subject property interests are necessary for the proposed
Project, which implements the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General
Plan and the Circulation and Parks Concepts of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page 7
The General Plan and Etiwanda North Specific Plan identifies the Day Creek
Boulevard improvements as well as improvements to other streets and intersections in the
vicinity. The proposed Project is consistent with the public and safety goals of meeting the
increased traffic demands in this growing section of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project to meet the goals of the
Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan and the Circulation and Parks
Concepts of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Recent residential development and proposed
residential development in the vicinity of the subject property interests makes the
implementation of the proposed Project necessary at this time. The proposed Project further
provides for the public health and safety by ensuring the availability of adequate streets to ensure
adequate traffic circulation and to ensure there are adequate parks in the area for City residents
B. The Project is Planned or Located in the Manner that will be Compatible with
the Greatest Public Good and Least Private Injury
The subject property interests are necessary for the proposed Project, which consists
of the construction of the Day Creek Boulevard and secondary residential streets, and the
construction of a park. The Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan
and the Circulation and Parks Concepts of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan envisioned the
construction of the proposed Project as planned and located to meet the City's increased traffic
demands. Because of the projected growth in the City in the vicinity of the subject property
interests, alternate locations will not enable the City to implement the Circulation Element of the
City's General Plan and will not further the public health and safety goals of the General Plan.
As planned and located, the proposed Project is consistent with the City's General
Plan and furthers the goals of providing necessary streets and adequate traffic circulation to serve
this growing area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The public health and safety requires that
adequate streets, adequate traffic circulation, and adequate parks accompany land development.
The proposed Project is necessary to meet the increased demands for streets and parks in this part
of the City. The subject property interests are necessary for the construction of the proposed
Project to allow the City to link the Day Creek Boulevard and secondary residential streets into
the existing system.
In addition, as set forth above, the potential environmental impacts of the proposed
Project, as planned and located, were studied and analyzed in connection with the potential
environmental impacts of the Tentative Tract Maps. Further, the City has made the required
environmental findings for the proposed Project pursuant to the addendum to the EIR and SEIR
and those findings are also the appropriate findings with regard to the proposed acquisition of the
subject property interests. All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with
the Tentative Tract Maps, including the EIR, SEIR, addendum to the SEIR and EIR, Planning
Commission Resolution No. 00-73, City Council Resolution No. 00-161, Ordinance 631,
Development Agreement 00-02, and Staff Report dated July 26, 2000, has been reviewed by City
staff in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and during the week of October 8,
2001, pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the
Public Resources Code, staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the
227
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
October 17, 2001
Page g
proposed Project and no new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would
require further environmental analysis.
C. The Subject Property Interests Described in the Resolution of Necessity are
Necessary for the Project
The proposed acquisition consists of the partial acquisition of the two larger parcels
identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0225-161-45 and 0225-101-34 for permanent roadway
easements for the planned construction of Day Creek Boulevard and a secondary residential
access road and for temporary construction easements. Further, the proposed Project would
require fee title to the parcel identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 0225-101-42 for park
purposes. As set forth above, the subject property interests are necessary for the proposed
Project, which implements the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General
Plan and the Circulation and Parks Concepts of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The proposed
acquisition of the subject property interests is required for the construction of the proposed
Project as planned and located and to enable the City to implement the Cimulation and Parks and
Recreation Elements of the General Plan and the Circulation and Parks Concepts of the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan in this area. Further, the subject property interests are necessary for the
proposed Project to ensure there are adequate streets and parks in this growing area of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
D. The Offer Required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made
to the owner of Record of the Property Sought to be Acquired
Pursuant to Government Code Section 7262 et seq., the City obtained and approved a
fair market value appraisal of the subject property interests, set just compensation in accordance
with the approved appraisal and extended a written offer on September 10, 2001 to the owner of
record of the subject property interests, Intex Properties, Inland Empire, L.P. A true and correct
copy of the offer letter is on file in the City Engineer's Office and is incorporated in this Staff
Report by this reference. The owner and the City have been engaged in negotiations pertaining
to the subject property interests but no negotiated purchase has been consummated at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
WilliamS. O'Nei~ '
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sc
Attachments
JI
U
RANCHO ETIWANDA
ADOPTED UNIVERSITY
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
EXH~Brr
210
._SENT BY: 10-16- 1 ;II:fiSAM; *~ ~]094772fi49;# 1/ 4
PALMIERI, TYLE~ ~gN~R, W~H~LM & WALD~ON LLP
T~LECOPIER (~49) ~-1004 ~0~ ~IM ~T W~ITER'~ OIRECT
(94g) 757-1225 P.O. BOX 19~1~ (~8) a51'~220
(848) 851-~51 IRYINE, G~IF~N~. ~Z~14-~8 ~krollkowskl~ptwww.~m
(949) B~I 8400
D~: ~ 16, 2~1 T~e: 11:28 ~
To. F. N~ T~one N~
~c ~ Ci~ Cl~k (~) 4~-~9 (~) 4~-27~
~T~ ~ OF pAG~ ~CL~G ~S FO~ IS: 4
PAL~IERL ~L~. WIBNEI~. W~LHBL~ & WALD~ON LLP
200~
10~00 Ctvle cen~e~
R~ohO ~oa~ga, ~ 91729
Int~ ~rop~tes, L.P, ~t~ons to ~opt~on
Re. fur!on o~ ~eo~slty ~ City o~
This fi~ has ~en retai~d to represent Intex. Prope~ies,
Inland ~tre, L.P., ("Intex") In oo~ec~lon
taking of potions of ~e a~ve-refer~c~ pro~i~
property") by ~e City of Rancho ~c~on~
We have re~iv~ a notice of ~e City's intention to adopt a
~'~: ,~.utlon of necessity (~e "re~lution-) authortztnq ~e t~inq
~i p~w~ion~ o[ the sub}eot prepay by condition. Based
-~uia t~otice, the hearl~ ~ the city co.oil on the re~olution is
:~,*~: ~ui:' October 17, 200! at 7:00 p.m. ~e p~se of thi~ letter
~u ~:~ provide ~r ~itten objections on ~half of Intex
a5Opti~i~ of ~e reoolution in lieu oI personally a~e~inq at the
hr~arit~q. Therefore, we request ~at thi~ let~r ~ included as
part of the focal record on ~is ag~da it~.
Intex ob~e~s to ~e adoption of ~e resolution on each of
~e followinq s~cific ~ounds:
On or ~ut ~pte~r 28, 2001,,Inte~ pro~ded a p~lic
records re.est to ~he City ;eekin~ ~nfo~a~ion a~ut the project
a~ its ~tential impacts to ~e 5~ject prope~y. The City was
' . · ~ BY: 10-16- 1 ;ll:~L~I; ~ 80~4772848;#. 8/ 4
~.t.$ re!at~d .to ~h. puh~c reoorde r~st.
,,-- ~m ~ua~u. pr~va~e..n~u~ ~d (3) ~e s~ Pro~ iS not
nebags~ for ~o pro)eot.
Silly ~t, h~ ~n ~e City concl~ively m~t ~o statutory
criteria [~ '.
adoption o~ the
pr~lded dock.s relat~ to ~e s~ a~d ~e/'PrOj~ h~ not
a ~ni~. continue ~e he~i~
info~tion can ~ o~atn~-~d confi~.
~v'~z'n~enC Code ~e~on 7267.1.~tea ~t ~he City ~ke.all
-ad ~y negotiation (rather ~n c~d~tior~ ~lS r~ard,
~n~ City provided Intex with insufficient ti ; in which to
r~s~aa to its preconde~ation offer to put.asa ~e Pr0~rty.
Accordingly, the City Aaa iail~ to a~ere to ~'e r~ir~ents of
clovernm.nt Code se~ion 7267~i prior ~o ~e Pr~sad ~option of
the resolution.
Ago%n, Intex r~ests ~at ~e City co~nue the heari~ on
~:ni~ agepda i~em until su~ time as n~ot!attons conceding
~cqub;l~.zuh of the subje~ pro~rty rea~ ah Impasse.'
<:ali~o~nia Oovern~nt Code section
'~ ~ r ,~ak~ a le~itimat~ offer of oom~ation
,~:,'.~x ~s infoaod and ~lieves ~at the a~pratsal on ~ich the
· -'~, ~' '~ purported Dracond~nati~ offer was .~sed do~ ~t
~,i'~L, ly ,aGess the oom~n~atio~ of ~tO~ of ~e ~ject
pro~y, namely ~e c~erc~al and ~e .park. 9ro~e~eS.
Int~ foyer objects to the adoption of the resolution on
the ~ou~ ~at the C~ty has already
Dro~sed proj~ ~sed u~n develo~ent
place. As su=h, any hearl~ res~lt~g in ~e adoption of the
* . ~ BY: 10-16- 1 ;II:~6AM ; -' 9094772849;# 4/ 4
PAL~IERI, TYL~I~ W[ENBH, W1LI~I/LM & WA~N I~
Oebbie a~, city Clerk
~0~ 16, 2001
Paqe 3
r~o~ution by ~e City ~0uld ~ a reds
Propo~ ra~olu~-~ - ..... ~ te~ined result.
~viro~ntmi ~vl~ ~ Z~[ fi~'~, so co~lete 'the
act, ~i~ ,~ates ~t~in -
~ a~ a~roV~ ~rto- -- --- ,-e~v!r°~~1 ~aeess~ts
r - ~ ~= z~~i0 -
8a~ed on t~ foregoing obj~tio~ I a
as t~se ob~ectio~ ~o .~ ~.~ ~-~_~,ma. ~ until suc
or ~ts conco~t~. ~ .... . ....... e City baa any
cont~ch the ~ersiqned at [949) 85~-7220. t~r, ~2 should
Ve~ t~l~ ~ours,
~arles S. Krollkowski
cc: Jeffrey L. Pierson
Roger D. "Ha~- DarRell
RESOLUTION NO. 01-239
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
CERTAiN REAL PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC
PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZiNG THE ACQUISITION
THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD, ET AL. IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE,
ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a municipal body, corporate and
politic, in the County of San Bemardino, State of California.
Section 2. The property hereinafter described is to be taken for a public use, namely
for street purposes and park purposes and all uses necessary and convenient thereto in connection
with the proposed Day Creek Boulevard, et al. Improvements Project (the "Project") pursuant to
the authority conferred upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga to acquire property by eminent
domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19, California Government Code sections
37350, 37350.5, 37351, 40401, and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1230.010 et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including but not limited to Sections 1240.010 through
1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610 and 1240.650, and other
provisions of law.
Section 3. The property to be taken is part of the larger parcels commonly known as
12260 Highland Avenue and 12250 Summit Avenue and fee title to the parcel commonly known
as 12374 Summit Avenue, identified respectively as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0225-161-45
and 0225-101-34, and 0225-101-42. The portions of the parcels identified as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 0225-161-45 and 0225-101-34 are sought to be acquired for permanent roadway
easements for the planned construction of Day Creek Boulevard and a secondary residential
access road and for temporary construction easements. The proposed Project would also require
fee title to the parcel identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 0225-101-42 for park purposes.
The legal description of the part of the larger parcel sought to be acquired and
identified as Assessor's Parcel Number No. 0225-161-45 is attached hereto as Exhibit "A' and
depicted on the sketch attached as Exhibit "A-I" and the legal description of the temporary
construction easement is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and depicted on the sketch attached as
Exhibit "B-I." The legal description of the part of the larger parcel sought to be acquired and
identified as Assessor's Parcel Number No. 0225-101-34 is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and
depicted on the map attached as Exhibit "C-I" and the legal description of the temporary
construction easement is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and depicted on Exhibit "D-I." The
legal description of the parcel sought to be acquired in fee and identified as Assessor's Parcel
Number 0225-101-42 is attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and depicted on the sketch attached as
Exhibit "E-I." Said legal descriptions and sketches are incorporated herein by this reference
RESOLUTION NO. 01-239
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
October 17, 2001
Page 2
Section 4. The proposed Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the
Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The proposed Project will improve Day Creek Boulevard, create
needed secondary residential streets and create a park to serve this area of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. It will further the public health and safety by ensuring adequate streets and
adequate traffic circulation in the area. Recent and proposed development in the vicinity of the
proposed Project makes the construction of the proposed Project necessary.
Section 5. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project were studied
and analyzed as an integral part of the approval by the City Council pursuant to Resolution No.
00-161 of the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report ("the Addendum") prepared by the City in connection with Tentative Tract Maps
Nos. 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902 and the refinements to these
Tentative Tract Maps as set forth in Development Agreement 00-02. The Environmental Impact
Report ("EIR") and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("SEIR") in connection with
Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902 were
previously certified by the County of San Bemardino.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"),
including Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and CEQA Guidelines Section 15096
and 15164, the City prepared the Addendum to address the refinements to the Tentative Tract
Maps. The City Council in adopting Resolution No. 00-161 at its meeting of August 16, 2000,
affirmed the EIR and SEIR as certified by the County and as augmented by the Addendum
prepared by the City as legally sufficient. The City Council found that based on the facts and
evidence, the Addendum was the adequate further environmental analysis that is required as
authorized by Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code and section 15162 of the Guidelines
and that the Addendum was completed in compliance with CEQA. The City further found that
the EIR, SEIR and Addendum collectively reflect the City Council's independent judgment and
analysis. The City Council pursuant to the requirements of section 15096(h) of the Guidelines,
made the required findings under CEQA, including those required by Section 15091 of the
Guidelines. The City caused a notice of determination required by Section 15094 and Section
150960) of the Guidelines to be filed as required by law. In connection with the adoption of the
facts, findings and statement of overriding considerations, the City Council incorporated the
mitigation measures recommended in the EIR and SEIR.
All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Planning
Commission Resolution No. 00-73, City Council Resolution 00-161, Ordinance 631, the EIR,
SEIR, Addendum, Staff Report dated July 26, 2000 and Development Agreement 00-02, and
notice of determination has been reviewed by City staff in connection with the proposed
Amendment to the Development Agreement 00-02 on September 26, 2001, and staff determined
that pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Amendment was
exempt from further CEQA clearance.
,251
RESOLUTION NO. 01-239
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
October 17, 2001
Page 3
Further, staff again reviewed all of the environmental documentation during the week of
October 8, 2001,in connection with the proposed Resolution of Necessity and pursuant to the
criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources
Code, staff concluded that there have been no substantial changes in the proposed Project and no
new information of substantial importance has been obtained that would require further
environmental analysis. These environmental findings are also the appropriate findings with
regard to the proposed acquisition of the subject property identified above.
Section 6. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and
determines that:
A. The public interest and necessity require the Project;
B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury;
C. The property described on Exhibits "A" through "E" attached hereto is
necessary for the proposed project; and
D. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made
to the owners of record.
Section 7. The City has complied with the notice requirements of Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1245.235.
Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon
the record before the City Council on October 17, 2001, which includes the Staff Report and all
documents referenced therein, including the environmental documents referenced above, and any
testimony, records, and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated herein
by this reference.
Section 9. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby authorizes and directs the City
Attorney to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of
competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A"
through "E" attached hereto.
Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
EXHIBIT "A".
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
PARCEL A:
1-HAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER ~)F THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M., CfI*'Y OF RANCHo
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAUFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
~*OLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTH HALF; THENCE NORTH 89°26'17- WEST, ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF, 102.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'19. EAST, ALONG A LINE 102.00 FEET
V~ESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF, 32.90 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF
,~ TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 261.33 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID
pARALLEL UNE, NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, 41.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09000'45- TO
THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 143.67 FEET A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS
SOUTH 81 "01'34' WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, 22.60 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
O9°00'45' TO A POINT ON A UNE 107.00 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL .WITH:THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
NORTH HALF; THENCE NORTH ~0°02'1'~' EAST, ALONG SAID pARALLEL LI~E, 96.~iB FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A .
TANGENT CURVE ~Q.N.CA..VE.EAS'rERLY HAVING A RADI~S .O.F 99.50::,FEET;. THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID.:-
CURVE, 6.03 FEET THROUGH
POINT ON A LINE:40.00 ,FEET,. sOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL VVlTH :'t"HEN(~P,'T~:EtNE.OI~ SAID NORTH HALF, SAID'..
PARALLEL UNE ALSO:BEING :THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN ~P. ARGEL' OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE-
M~-'l ROPOUTAN WATER' OiSTR1CT..OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY' DEED~RE:~0RDED:'IN BOOK 7266, PAGE 71~1',.
OFFICIAL RECORDS. OF. S~ID::COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 89.25'52.' EAS.T':/:AIJONG ;?~A. IO PARALLEL LINE, 196.9.6' '
FEET TO A POINT:0N THE~EAST LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF; THENCE'SOUTH '00702.19. WEST, ALONG SAID EAST:
LINE, 289.67 FEET TO THEiPOINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.80 ACRES
PARCEL B:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M., CITY OF RA~ICHO
CUCAMONG~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNI~ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAiD NORTH HALF; THENCE SOUTH 0004'21' VVEST, ALONG
T~IE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID NORTH HALF, 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY ENE SOUTH 0004'21' WEST, 169.74 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 89°55'39- EAST, 49.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A ENE 49.00 FEET EASTERLY AND pARALLEL
WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 00'04~1' EAST, 50.00
FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 38~35'15' WEST, 25.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 33.00
FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MNE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL UNE
NORTH 00~4'21' EAST, 82.25 FEET; THENCE LEA. VING SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 54°55'39' EAST, 29.53 FEET,
TO A POINT ON A LINE 40.00 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF,
SAID PARALLEL LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO
THE M~I~OPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 7266, PAGE
711, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89'25'52' WEST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 57.50
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CO NTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.16 ACRES
SEE EXHIBIT "A-I", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PREPARED IN THE OFFTCES~OF ALLARD ENGI~NEE~NG
~ARE WARE, PLS 5820
EXP. 0~/30/04
EXHIBIT 'A-I'
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
P.~ECEL 'B' AR,rd~ SC, AL[: 1"=100'
APPROX. 0.16 ACRES
I
UNE OF THE N I/2, 'FUTURE ~ OF I"
.NE: 1/4, NW 1/4, ~
· c:EC. 29 L .. :: ~)AY-CREEK BLVD.
;Ivi[W.O..PER BK. 7-266,. PG.,
.:
N 1/~,,, NW 1
SW 1/4, 'SEC.;.29'," "<";"~"
~a'3S'lS'WT1N'RSW'$'B'B'J~'
SEC. 29
~£ ~/4. ~w 1/4. ~ ,'
SEC. 29 NO0'02'l 9"E:
(~ (~) (~) |N8g'2I~' 17. P.O~.
n=09"00'45' D=Og"O0'4.5" D=O3'2.B'18"
R=2~1.3~' R=143.BT' R=gg..50' I
L=,e,. 1.11.' L=22.60' L=~.03' ' I
PARCEL "A" AREA
APPROX. 0.80 ACRES '
EXHIBIT "B"
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST,
S.B.B.M., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTH HALF; THENCE NORTH 89"26'17"
WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF, 102.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89°26'17' WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 15.20 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°23'23- EAST, 32.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH O4'28~03" WEST, 63.54 FEET; THENCE-
NORTH 00°02'19- EAST, 96.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°29;10"'WEST 115.93 FEET; THENCE I~ORTH
89'25'52' WEST,..407.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ~0"04'21' ':WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SO~JTH'
· .38'35'~I5'-EAsT~ '-17.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O0~04'2~'.-'"...wEs~,':70.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89755'39.'. '
· -WES~ ~9.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08°02'14' EAS~-,~'I~6:32'FEET TO A POINT ON THE souTHERLY'
- LiN~OF'~A!O"NORTH HALF; THENCE NoRTH'89.°26~I;7.~:INE~T':-AI~ONG SAID SOUTHERLY
;- FEE~'.:T~. 'THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF sAID'::~OR~."HAEE; .THENCE NORTH 00~34'21."~.EAS~;
. .ALONG'~AID.:WESTERLY LINE, 120.01 FEET.; ~NC·~' :.EE~.. V!NG SAID WESTERLY LIN~.SOU'J~I~:
'"'~ 89;'' ~"3~'...55' :E~I'.. ':49. .00 FEET TO A PO NT ON· .A 'LINE~9:00':FEET'-EASTERLY. . . . . AND PARALLEL'TO. . ~AJ~'...
"WESTER,LY'LINE; THENCE NORTH 00"04~21' EAS~, ALONG :'SAID PARALLEL ENE,'50.00 FEE~;
THENCE NORTH 38°35'15- WEST, 25.61 FEET TO ~A-:POINT; ON 'A MNE 33.00 FEET EASTERLY
p/~ALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE 'N.ORTH '00'04'21' EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL
LINE, 82.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54°55'39' EAST,.29.53 FEET'TO A POINT ON A UNE 40.00 FEET
· SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH 'LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF, SAID POINT ALSO
BEGIN ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE METROPOMTAN
WATER DISTRICT PER BOOK 7266, PAGE 711 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 89"25'52'
EAST, ALONG ~JD PARALLEL MNE, 403.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44"29'10' EAST, 128.54 FEET; TO
'THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 99.50
FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 86'29~.2" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE 6.03 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'28'19' TO A POINT ON A LINE 107.00
FEET WEETERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF; THENCE SOUTH
00"02'19' WEST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 96.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING oF A TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 143.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG
SAID CURVE 22.60 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09~0'45' TO THE BEGINNING OF A
REVERSE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS.OF 261.33 FEET; A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING BEARS
SOUTH 81°01'34- WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, 41.11 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09"00'45' TO A POINT ON A LINE 102.00 FEET WESTERLY AND pARALLEL WITH
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF; THENCE SOUTH 00'02'19' WEST, ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE, 32.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.45 ACRES
SEE EXHIBIT "B-t", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS REFERENCE
MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING
MARK WARE, PL~ ~0
EXP. 06/30/04 EXHA_UNIV_E2
235
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
EXHIBIT 'B-I'
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NORTH UNE OF THE 0
~ ~/4, SEC. 29' SCALE: .1"=100'
.. RIGHT-OF--WA[~
'
78.97'
1 '~t NOO'02' 19"E
TiN, ESW,
SOU~-I UNE OF THE
N~23'23'[
50.00 NSF26' 17~ N8~2~'17~ --
-- UNE OF ~E
N ~/2, NE ~/4, ~ 1/4, CURVE DATA
~ D=OS'O0'45' LINE DATA
R=261.33' .
L=6.05' ~PEOX. 0.~5 ACR~
EXHIBIT "C"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
PARCEL "A"
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M., CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, coUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNI/~ MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE SOUTH 00°'17'31' EAST,
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF, 292.03 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 40.00 FEET
NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF, SAID PARALLEL LINE
ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE'
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 7260,
PAGE 311, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89"25'52" WEST, AJ.ONG SAID
PARALLEL' LINE, 136.32 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING ~AID 'PARALLEL' LINE, NORTH-54°27~44
FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 108.00 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL VVITH THE EASTERLq~:~tNE OF SAID
SouTH HALF; THENCE NORTH 00~17'31" WEST,:.~LONG SAID PARALLEL L NE7142~6! :,EEET TO THE
~BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CUR~/~coNCAVE .-T. Or'THE SOUTHEAST HAVING .A:~OIUS:.~)E.:;87,~00 FEET;
~'HENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLE!~J-INE; NORTHERLY' ALONG SAID CURVE 21[3~,FEET~CFHR~UGH A
'CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°02'11';":TI~ENCE'NORTH ~.$o44'40" EAST 5.04 FEET:TO~3:HE'~BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVES'TO'~THE.NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF.:~-3.~O ~F..EET,~%THENCE
'NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CUR~E 1~,88 'FEET...THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF. --'.I~,.~02I~,~'~O-'POINT ON A
· UNE' 102.00 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITEI'-~THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOt~FI HA~F~'~THENCE
NORTH 00°1731- WEST, ALONG SAID' pAP~H Fh LINE 85.22 FEET TO A PoINT ON".TRE NORTH.,EINE OF
sAID SOUTH HALF; 'THENCE S(3UTFt 89"25'38' .EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, ~I.02~01~FEET"TO 'THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.72 ACRES
PARCEL
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHVVEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.B.M., CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY'~
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE NORTH 00'20'45' WEST,
ALONG THE WESTERLY ENE OF SAID SOUTH HALF, 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 0020'45' WEST, 182.56 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH' 89'25'52' EAST, 50.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00"34'08' WEST.,
50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°39'10- WEST, 23.08 FEET, TO A POINT ON A LINE 33.00 FEET EASTERLY
AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY ENE; THENCE SOUTH 00'20'45' EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL MNE
99.35 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 54°43'48- EAST[ 29.19 FEET TO A POINT ON A
MNE 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF, SAID
PARALLEL LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAI CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO
THE M~OPOETAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 7260,
PAGE 311, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89"25'52' WEST, ALONG SAID'
PARALLEL LINE, 56.74' TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES
SEE EXHIBIT "C-t", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRI Rp~~.FERENCE MADE A
PART HEREOF.
I 5 2o I I
EXP. 06130104 EXHA UNIV E3
-
EXHIBIT 'C-1'
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL OESCRIPTION
PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
PARCEL "B" AREA PARCEL "A" ,AREA SCALE: 1"=100'
I APPROX. 0.17 ACRES APPROX. 0.72 ACRES
I I
I
r-NORTH UNE OF THE S 1./2, J I
I [SE.,1/~; SW i/4-. NW 1/~t.
~ ~.: sec.' .,~9:;
I .: .' -~ ., . . .
wEST LINE "Q[';.~E' .S..'
SEC. 29'
· "s .~-:Z~;~ "'~rc' ~/4, sw 1/4,.. .~
.... i:NW', i2.~4, sec. ss
.~r~N, 'now, s.s.s.~.
M.W.D. PER BK. 7260~ 136.32
N89'25'52'W PG. 311, O.R.
(' SOUTH. UNE OF mE S 1./2, X ~ ·
si ~/4, sw ~/4..w ~/4. ~
I
Ii SEC. 29 \\ ~1 ~ m
I
CURVE DATA LINE DATA
5.04'
Q R=87,00'
L=21.31' Q S89'25'52'E.
D=14'02'11" 50.12'
Q R=73.00' Q 544'39'10"W
L= 17.88" 23.08'
QS54'43'48'E
29.19'
EXHIBIT "D"
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE S
VVEST, S.B.B.M., cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNI~ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE SOUTH 89~25'38"
EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF, 20.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 03°3~'55~'EAST,' 9~.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89~25'52" EAST, 45.41
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0(7'34'08' WEST, 67.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°39'10- WEST, 37.18
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00~20'45' EAST, 84.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°43'48- EAST, 19.2t FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89~31'03' EAST, 466.41 FEET;' THENCE-NORTH'50~46'36~EAST, 21.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00~1.7~31' WEST, 132.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING..~F A TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE To iTHE.'SQU'~IEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF $00.00~ FEE~ENCE NORTHERLY
ALONG SAII~ cuRVE~4"50 FEET.THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGI~E'o~ :t~: .~J.3.2. '~11~''THENCE NORTH ·
13o44,40- F_~ST.,~ .5~04'~ FEET~TO THE BEGINNING OF~'~'A' T~IGEI~F~CURVE CONCAVE
~ THENCE.NORTNERE¥~AEONG SAID CURVE
NORTHWESTERIjY. HA~ING A RADIUS OF 60.00 FEET;
14.70 FEET.THRQUGH. A.CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°02°1~';.THENCENORT~I'007.~7.'31' WEST, 85.41'
TO A POIN'[ ON ~HE;NOR3~IERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALE~:3;H'ENC.'E"SO -15~H'89'25'38' EAST,
ALONG sAID; NORTM UN~' 13'.00 FEET TO A POINT ON".A.. LINEv-'~O2Lg0;~FEET WEST OF AND
PARALLEL VviTH =THE EAST. LINE-OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE~U3~003'1'7'.'31' EAST, ALONG
SAID pARALLEL LINF~ 85.22 FEETTO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT GUR~ CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID pAI~AI~FL UNE,
soUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 17.88 FEET; THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°02'11';
THENCE SOUTH 13°44'40' WEST, 5.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE .TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 87.00 FEET; THENCE soUTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE 21.31 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°02'11- TO A POINT ON A LINE
108.00 FEET WESTERLY AND PARALLEL W~TH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOtJTH HALF;
THENCE soUTH 00°17'31- EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 142.61 FEET; THENCF~ LEAVING
SAID PARALLEL MNE sOUTH 54°27'44' WEST, 34.65 FEET TO A POINT ON A UNE 40.00 FEET
NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID SOUTH HALF, SAID
PARALLEL LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED
TO THE METROPOLITAN WA'rER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AS DISCLOSED BY DEED
RECORDED IN BOOK 7260, PAGE 311,' OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH
89~25'52' WEST, ALONG SAID pARALLEL LINE 464.89 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID pARALLEL
LINE~ NORTH 54°43.48- WEST, 29.19 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 33.00 FEET EASTERLY AND
pARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE NORTH 00°20'45- WEST,
ALONG SAID pARALLEL UNE 99.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°39'10' EAST, 23.08 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 00°34'08" EAST, 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89~25'52' WEST, 50.12 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE WESTERLY ENE OF SAID sOUTH HALF; THENCE NORTH 00'20'45' WEST, ALONG SAID
WESTERLY LINE, 109.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0;33 ACRES
SEE EXHIBIT "D-J", SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS REFERENCE
MADE A PART HEREOF. ~EX
PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING
MARY, WARE, PL$ o~.u D
EXP. 06~30~04
H,_UNIV_E4
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
EXHIBIT "D-I'
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
II "~= NORTH UNE OF THE S 1,/2, SE 1/4,
/.---- SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 29-
i/ ~ S89'25'38;E 13.0('
_ _ ~-/Ld ~u.v. S89'25'38"E 556.21' ~
: o, Y/~.//, 'T._i:~crz,~'o,'w NW 114. s~-C. ~ ~,.~ ........ .~,
~0.00. !1...: ~_..~.T, :~n' ~=
, ~k~ ....SW :1~4, ~ 1/4. SEC. 2~. ~
~0~20 4~,~. - '~S~'45'E · ' '.'. ~ ' --~-'- .... ~
-- I ~ N8~25'52~ ¢64.89" ~ ~ 54.65'
MWO PER BK. 7260, PG. 511, O.R. ''
~RE ~ OF ~AN AVE. ~ I
SO~ UNE OF ~E S 1,/2, SE 1/4,-. ~
J ~ 1/4, ~ 1/4, SEC. 29 ~RE ~ OF DAY CREEK aL~-'
D=14'02'11' ~ SlY44'40~
' ( 1 } R=87.00' 5.04'
L=21.31'
~ R=73.00'~ 19.2~'
i
L= 17.88'
D=14'02'11 '
R=60.00'
L= 14.70'
Exp.~
'~ ~ APPROX. 0.53 ACR~
EXHIBIT "E"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - FOR PARK PURPOSES
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, S.B.BM., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG~ COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF; THENCE NORTH
00o14'17' WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID sOUTH HALF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT
ON A LINE 40.00 FEET NORTH AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH
TI~L~E~J=OJNT. OF BEGINN NG; THENCE CONTINUING NO,t IH ~t~,Lo oz vvc:o I, ~
EL:LINE, 271.93 FEET; THENCE LF~Ni~'~S~]~[~ ~LEL lINE, NORTH 00~17'31'
ST, 'AL:.0.NG THE EASTERLY LINE OF. ~T~I.~ E.. ~v~.'~l~.Y. :~30.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTH:
~CE' ~e~-UTH 00~J4'08' WEST, 2Sl.S6FEET t33:i~/E,"-'~R .UE'.POINT OF BEGINNING'
:coNTAiN.!,N.'G.APPRaXIMATELY 1.84 ACRES .
· SEE EXHIBff'~'E'I", SKETCH TO ACcoMPAN~ LEGAL 'DESCRIPTION AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING
MARK WARE, PLS 5820 OA/I'E'
EXP. 06/30100
H UNV' 5
EXHIBIT 'E-I'
SK'------------------ETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL 0ESCRIPT1oN
FOR PARK PURPOSES
I
St_C, ~.9 .'...
.'~.~ u.£ or T.£ ~:s7~'. ~
s ~/2. ~ ~/*. si ~/~, S8~25,58.~ I' "
, . =~/Z~.~.ota~ ~ .
.~. s~s, o... ·
~-' ....i7~ "oc-/
N 8~25'52" W 5~.g8! x I. ~ "" '~
S"LY liMN[ ~1/4J
I
SCALE: "=200'
APPROX, 1.84. ACRES
I~ a C H O C U C A M O N G A
DATE: October 17, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and
recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight
pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services
Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Hermosa Park:
· Installation of the new play equipment is underway and is scheduled to be completed by
mid October.
Ralph M. Lewis Park:
· Construction of the park is proceeding well. The contractor is currently working on
installation of the irrigation system, as well as the hardscape, including concrete
walks and planter walls. The restroom building is approximately 80% complete.
2 /3
CItY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 2001
Heritage Park:
· Council awarded the Tot Lot Renovation Project on October 3r~, to Thomsen
Landscape. Removal of the existing play equipment will begin by mid October and the
tot lot will be closed until all work is complete in early spring.
Red Hill Park:
· The Community Services Department storage building walls are complete, the roof is
being framed and the electrical work is approximately 80% complete. It is anticipated
that the building will be completed by the end of October.
Sports Complex:
· Stadium turf renovation is well under way. Turf removal has begun and turf edges in the
infield have been sod cut and removed to eliminate a lip in the turf to brick dust
transition.
B, COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Seniors:
· The Autumn Leaves Fashion Show will be held at the Senior Center on Saturday,
October 20, at 10:00 a.m. The program, entitled Bringing in the Fall, will be highlighted
by new fall and winter fashions modeled by several of the Center's seniors. A light
salad lunch and entertainment will also be provided. Don't miss this spectacular event
that is co-sponsored by the VIP Club as a fundraiser. Tickets are $5 per person.
· The Senior Halloween Spooktacular will be held at the Senior Center on Thursday,
October 25, at 10:00 a.m. Seniors are invited to come in costume. There will be prizes
and games for the mature ghosts and goblins. There will also be plenty of food,
entertainment and scary fun. This event is co-sponsored by the VIP Club.
· Flu Clinic and Health Fair - The Senior Center has teamed with San Antonio Community
Hospital and San Bernardino County Department of Public Health for the Center's
annual Flu Clinic and Health Fair, to be held at the Senior Center on Saturday,
November 3, from 9:00 a.m. to noon. San Antonio Hospital will administer this free flu
clinic. The Health Fair will feature 25 - 30 vendors with demonstrations, health
screenings and display booths to inform the public on various senior health and social
service items.
· A very special Veterans Day Tribute will be offered at the Senior Center on Thursday,
November 8, at 10:00 a.m. This event, co-sponsored by the Elks Club, will honor those
brave men and women who have served in our country's armed forces. There will be
-2-
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 200}
special entertainment from the local high schools, including an ROTC Color Guard, Jazz
Band and a special tribute will also be included.
· The 'Crafty Seniors' Craft Sale will be held at the Senior Center on Thursday, November
15, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. This annual event is a special opportunity to purchase
beautiful and creative crafts made by our seniors.
· The Senior Center will offer for the first time a free Thanksgiving Dinner and Program on
Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 22, at 1:00 pm, for seniors on a reservation
basis only. Seating will be limited to 150.
· The next regular meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee will be held at the Senior
Center on Monday, October 22, at 9:00 a.m.
Human Services:
· Eider Law Matters Seminars - Attorney Gregory Wood will provide a free presentation
on Trusts, Wills and Estates on October 26th starting at 12-noon.
· HICAP Workshop - A free workshop provided through the Health Insurance Counseling
and Advocacy Program will address issues on what Medicare covers, how to choose an
HMO, supplemental insurance and more. This informative program will take place on
October 29th between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 am.
· Better Breathers Club - Sponsored by the American Lung Association, this free
program is a support group for those suffering from respiratory problems or anyone
interested in finding out more about them.
Trips and Tours:
· Oktoberfest in Alpine Village - October 24th . Let's go to the home of the Oktoberfest --
Alpine Village. Enjoy groat entertainment, lunch (on us) and shopping (on your own).
· Nethercutt Collection - November 3~d. Join us for a 2-hour guided tour of this unique
collection of functional fine art including classic automobiles, antique furniture and
musical instruments. On the way home we'll stop at Farmer's Market for some
shopping.
· Getty Center - November 20% The Getty Center tour begins with a tram ride to the
summit, taking in unexpected views of the historic Sepulveda Pass. At the museum you
can watch a brief orientation film. From there, you are free to experience all that Getty
has to offer at your own pace.
-3-
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBI~I~ 17, 2001
· In '~he nex~ month the Senior Center will send passengers on several multi-day tours
and cruises, including Fiesta Mexico Cruise, Mississippi Barging, French Canadian
Color Tour, Autumn in Washington D.C., Fall Foliage Barging, Three Continents
Voyager Cruise (Asia, Africa, Europe), California Wine Country, Thanksgiving Ecstasy
Cruise to Mexico and Ozark Mountain Music.
Volunteer Services:
· The table below summarizes CSD volunteer usage for the month of August and
year-to-date.
MONTH: AUGUST 2001 YEAR TO DATE
# of # of Hours$ Value # of # of Hours $ Value
Volunteers Volunteers
Admin 5 15 210 40 95 1,330
Sports 266 1,506 21,084 1780 22,271 311,794
Sr & Human 61 327 4,578 537 2,073.5 28,889
Services
' Special 7 14 19(~ 140 572 8,008
Events
Youth 67 555 7,770 174 1,362 17,948
Programs
406 2,417 33,838 2,671 26,364 367,969
*Dollar value based on $14.00 per hour.
Teens:
· The Teen Center began their fall schedule in September. Staff is planning several
special events, including the annual Halloween Bash on Saturday October 27th, which
last year drew over 200 teens.
· The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) also begins its fall program of monthly
meetings and planning the years' activities. The twice-monthly babysitting service,
Night on the Town is going strong and is usually at capacity.
· The Colleqe Fair is planned for October 18t~. This annual event draws approximately
60 colleges and universities and more than 2,000 teens and parents.
-4-
CiTY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILI11E5 AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 2001
· The Teen Workshop Series continues with £ducatJon Funding 101 on Thursday
November ,pt. This course covers grants, student loans, scholarships and other
sources of college funding.
· A Skate Park Demonstration and Safety Clinic Js scheduled for Saturday, November
3~d at the Spruce Avenue Park 8kate Facility. This quarterly program will feature
equipment give-a-ways and a program provided by professional skaters to include a
safety clinic and skills demonstration.
· Our new program Teen Connection started up on October 8"~' City staff are on the
local high school campuses on a regular basis to talk to teens about volunteer
opportunities with the City.
Youth Activities:
· Playschool began September 10th at near capacity, with over 530 children enrolled.
The staff will be looking at age groupings and adding classes where necessary.
· The annual Pumpkin Carvinq Workshop will be held on October 27th at Red Hill
Park. Approximately 50 youngsters are anticipated to participate in this fun-filled
event.
· The Mobile Recreation Proqram, Fun on the Run, will start serving the community on
for the fall on October 1,2001. This very successful program served over 900 youth
during the month of August. The recreation unit will go to the following park sites in
the afternoons and early evenings during the fall season: Monday, Bear Gulch Park,
Tuesday, Old Town Park, Wednesday, Hermosa Park, Thursday, Mountain View
Park, Friday Windrows Park.
Youth Enrichment Services (YES) Grant:
· Youth Enrichment Services (YES) is going strong at the Mulberry Learning Center..
For the month of August we served over 700 residents.
° Over the next month there will be over 14 classes offered free of charge to parents
of newborn to 5 year old children. On Saturday, October 13th, the YES program
offered a Baby Expo at Lions Center East. Over two hundred and fifty community
members attended this very informative event.
· The YES Program is currently preparing to open its second location at the City's Lion
East Community Center.
-5-
2z/7
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 2001
Youth Sports:
· The Sports Advisory Committee met on October 10, 2001. Field request material for
the Spring/Summer 2002 (February 1-July 31, 2002) was turned in at this meeting. The
next meeting of the Committee is scheduled for November 14th. At the November
meeting the staff field allocation will be reviewed/approved.
· The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Soccer 375 3-5/boys & girls 38
Flag Football 165 8-13/boys & girls 12
Volleyball 60 8-13/girls 6
Roller Hockey 161 8-13/boys & girls 19
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory
Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport leagues. For the
reporting period, 12 sport groups utilized 18 city parks and had 60,964 participants and
101,470 spectators.
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below and on the next page provides drop-in/open play participation at the
Center for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants
Adult Basketball 456
Youth Basketball 695
Adult Racquetball 300
Youth Racquetball 35
Adult Volleyball 18
Youth Volleyball 246
Jazzercise 974
Adult Sports:
· The table below and on the next page summarizes adult sports activities for men and
women for the reporting period:
Activity # Participants # Teams Gender J
Softball 2,560 160 Male/Female
I
-6-
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 2001
I Activity # Participants #Teams Gender
Flag Football 60 8 Male
Tennis28 N/A Male/Female
· Four adult softball tournaments will be held during the month of October at the
Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex.
Community Wide Special Events:
· Rancho Cucamonga Remembers .... The Community Services Department in
collaboration with the police, fire, public works departments and city manager's office
planned a special tribute event, honoring the heroes and those affected by the events of
September 11th events. In just two weeks an impressive line up of entertainment,
military, police and fire traditions, inspirational readings, fireworks, music and candle
light ceremony were arranged for the October 2® event. Approximately 5,000 attended
the 2-hour event at the Epicenter. The evening was well received by the public and the
hundreds of participants on the field. The evening was also made possible by the
generosity of many local businesses that donated services or materials for the event.
· Founders Day Parade and Celebration - Staff is planning the annual parade and
celebration to be held this year on Saturday, November 10th. The parade theme is
Salute to America. A new element this year will be pre-parade entertainment at the
start of the parade route (near Base Line and Archibald) beginning at 8:30 a.m. The
parade steps off at 9:30 a.m. and will feature approximately 200 units of marching
; bands, drills squads, community groups and floats and novelty acts. The Celebration
takes place at Red Hill Community Park from 10:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. The Celebration
features a children's fun zone, hands-on crafts areas, food booths and the Chamber of
Commerce Business Expo.
Parks and Facilities:
· Park monitors continue to offer a great service to the residents. They are out 7-days a
week to make sure all is well and safe in our local parks.
· The table below and on the next page provides information on park reservations for the
month of September 2001:
Shelter Location Attendance # of Applicati, Number Hours of Use
Processed Rentals
Red Hill 3,254 39 Resident 41 182
Community Park 2 Non-Resident
Heritage Community 315 7 Resident 8 43
Park 1 Non-Resident
Hermosa Park 95 3 Resident 3 60
0 Non-Resident
-7-
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 2001
Shelter Location Attendance # Applicati, Number Hours of
Processed of Rentals Use
Coyote Canyon Park 515 16 Resident 16 60
0 Non-Resident
Civic Center 0* 0* 0* 0*
Courtyard
Red Hill 50 3 Resident 3 15
Amphitheater 0 Non-Resident
Total 4,609 68 Resident 29 299
3 Non-Resident
NO rentals due to scheduled constnnction.
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
· Equestrian Center usage for the months of October/November 2001 is shown in the
table below.
Group Date Event/Time Frame
Alta Riding Club October 4~ Board Meeting/7:00-9:00 p.m.
Rising Stars EquestrianOctober 6t~ Regional Disabled Horse Show/8:00-5
4-H Club October 15t~ General Meeting/7:00-9:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club October 16~ General Meeting/7:00-10:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club October 21st Play Day Horse Show/8-5:00 p.m.
4-H Club October 27t~ Halloween Horse Show/8-5:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club November 1st Board Meeting/7-10:00 p.m.
Rising Stars EquestrianNovember 4tn Schooling Dressage Show/8a.m.-5:00 p.m.
4-H Club November 19t~ General Show/7-9:00 p.m.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The next meetinq of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on Thursday,
October 18, 2001. At this meeting the Commission is scheduled to discuss:
> Update on the status of the gymnasium at Cucamonga Middle School.
> Status on Etiwanda Creek Park.
> Status on Napa Street Soccer Complex.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· The Community Foundation did not meet on September 11, 2001, due to the tragic
events that took place in New York City, Washington D.C. and upstate Pennsylvania.
· The following items were discussed at the Foundation's October 9, 2001, meeting:
-8-
CI'~Y COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
OCTOBER 17, 2001
> Discussion regarding Founder's Gala 2001.
> Review of prioritized action steps/board member assignments and approval of a
timeline for their completion.
· RC Community Foundation Gala - Staff is working closely with the Foundation and their
ambassadors to plan an Evening of Elegance, on Saturday, November 3~d at the
Ontario Convention Center. This black tie fundraiser features top quality dining,
professiohal entertainment, silent auction and casino gaming activities.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
· The following activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period:
> ProVantage - Used Car Sale - Epicenter Special Event Area - September 20-
24, 2001.
:> Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - Grape Harvest Festival-
Epicenter Special Event Area - October 3-8, 2001.
· Staff is working with representatives from the following organizations for future activities
at the Epicenter:
> Vons - Corporate/Celebrity Game- Epicenter Stadium - October 20, 2001.
Res pec/t~lly s~b~itt~,
O'Neil
Community Services Director .~ City Engineer
hlCOMMSERV~Council&BoardstCityCouncil~StaffReportst2OOllupdate10.17.01.doc
-9-