HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/02/06 - Agenda Packet OITY O'F
RANCH ONGA
Rancho C~caZmo~l~cJa~OA 917,30
I ~ 2~2 J
City Offic~ (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
g~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
[] CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
February 6, 2002
ARency, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ............................... Member
Grace Curatalo ......................... Member
Bob Dutton .............................. Member
Jack Lam .........................City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander , Biane __.,
Curatalo Dutton__, and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Recognition of Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation's
Founder's Night Gala Sponsors and Ambassadors.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: January 2, 2002
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 1/9/02, 1/16/03 and 1/23/02 and 1
Payroll ending 1/13/02 for the total amount of $3,772,432.03.
3. Approval of Co-Sponsorship of Quakes/Hispanic Chamber of 29
Commerce Mega Mixer at the Epicenter on February 28, 2002.
4. Approval of a Request for Waiver of Epicenter Special Event Area 32
Fees for the Local Chapter of the California Association of School
Transportation Official's School Bus Roadeo to be held on March 15-
16, 2002.
5. Approval for Renewal of a Five-Year Agreement between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and Citrus Little League for Snack Bar and Field 35
Use.
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002
2
6. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and 40
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract No. 16239
located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line
Road, submitted by Diversified Pacific-APN: 2227-691-01.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-038 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT 16239
RESOLUTION NO. 02-039 42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. I AND 3 FOR TRACT 16239
7. Approval to accept the Bids received and award and authorize the
49
execution of the Contract in the amount of $50,251.30 ($45,683.00
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, All American
Asphalt (CG 02-008), for the Construction of the 8 Street Pavement
Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, to be funded
from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1297176-0.
8. Approval to accept the Bids received and award and authorize the 52
execution of the Contract in the amount of $95,585.60 ($86,896.00)
plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction,
Inc. (CO 02-009), for the Construction of the Base Line Road
Pavement Rehabilitation from Lion Street to Hellman Avenue, to be
funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 11763035650/1199176-0.
9. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 55
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for
Improvements for CUP 97-19, submitted by American Stores
Properties, Incorporated, located on the northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-040 57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-19 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002 3
10. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 58
Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for
Tract 15871-2, submitted by William Lyon Homes, Inc., located on the
northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-041 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15871-2 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
11. Approval to accept the Construction of the Access Ramp 61
Improvements generally located along Hermosa Avenue and Lemon
Avenue, Contract No. 01-078 as complete, retain the Performance
Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release Labor and Material Bond and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve
the final Contract amount of $68,211.00.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-042 61~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ACCESS
RAMP IMPROVEMENTS GENERALLY
LOCATED ALONG HERMOSA AVENUE AND
LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-078
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
12. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DR 97-33, 64
located on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Rochester
Avenue, submitted by Dove Investments, Incorporated.
13. Approval to accept the Construction of the Traffic Signal and Safety 66
Lighting at Rochester Avenue and Lark Drive, Contract No. 01-025 as
complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve
the final Contract amount of $83,740.00
RESOLUTION NO. 02-043 68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND
SAFETY LIGHTING AT ROCHESTER AVENUE
AND LARK DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 01-025
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002
4
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-03 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Victoria
Community Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial for .24 acre adjacent
to the ease side of Lot 73 of Tract 15875 near the northeast corner
of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. The City will also
consider community plan text changes to better define the scope of
Village Commercial development in the immediate area. Related
files: Genera[ Plan Amendment 00-02A, Victoria Community Plan
Amendment 00-02, and General Plan Amendment 002-02C. Staff
has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 662 (second reading) 70
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-03, A
REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW
RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL FOR .24
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEAR THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND
MAKING TEST AMENDMENTS TO THE
DESCRIPTION OF THE VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
DRCDCA01-02 - CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend various sections of the Foothill and Industrial Districts by
adding or modifying text and graphics regarding the Foothill
Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan.
CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - A request to establish streetscape standards
known as the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan
for that portion of Foothill Boulevard within the Terra Vista
Community Plan.
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002
5
CONSIDERATION OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT
DRCVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
establish streetscape standards known as the Foothill
Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan for that portion of
Foothill Boulevard within the Victoria Community Plan.
ORDINANCE NO. 675 (second reading) 75
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT, DRCDCA01-02, A
REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS
OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS BY ADDING OR
MODIFYING TEXT AND GRAPHICS
REGARDING THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 676 (second reading) 92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT
DRCTVCPA01-01, A REQUEST TO
ESTABLISH STREETSCAPE STANDARDS
KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT PORTION
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN TERRA
VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
ORDINANCE NO. 677 (second reading) 106
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT
DRCVCPA01-03, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH
STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS
THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66
VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT
PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
WITHIN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002
6
F.~. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
No items Submitted.
G._=. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H.~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. PRESENTATION BY CHAFFEY COLLEGE ON PROPOSED BOND
MEASURE "L" (Oral)
2. CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR A USED OIL
RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OiL 120
RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING
ENHANCEMENT ACT
RESOLUTION NO. 02-044 122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR A USED OIL RECYCLING
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL
RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE USED OIL
RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT
I_. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S 123
RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT PAUL WILLIAMS TO THE
LIBRARY FOUNDATION
2. UPDATE ON DMV OFFICE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA 124
3. UPDATE ON SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL 125
City Council Agenda
February 6, 2002
7
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at
this meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on January 31, 2002, seventy two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
January 2, 2002
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Reqular Meeting
A. CALLTO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, January 2, 2002 in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:26 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
A~so present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman,
City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Flavio Nunez, Assistant RDA Analyst;
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst;
Michael Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Chief Dennis
Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Smith, Fire Administration Resource
Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly
Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
BI. Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation to the City by the San Bernardino County Safety
Employees' Association for the support in aiding fundreising efforts for Fireflghting and Law
Enforcement heroes of New York City.
Detective Bill Abemathie from the San Bernardino County Safety Employees' Association presented the
certificate to the City.
B2. Presentation of FDNY Thank You America Bike Tour.
Kimberly Smith, Fire Administration Resource Manager, showed the Council a video and power point
presentation about this event.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. John Lyons stated there were video games being sold in the City that should be outlawed because
of their content. He commented on the sales tax increase. He hoped that Bob Dutton, once elected to
the Assembly, could help to change this.
Councilmember Dutton suggested he write a letter to Governor Davis.
C2. Rachel Pazant, Sterling Court, stated they need a crossing guard at Vineyard Jr. High School. She
felt it should be at Highland and Mayberry.
C3. EIva Rubacalva stated she is replacing Cheryl Karns due to her retirement from the Edison
Company, and that she would be the new Rep for Rancho Cucamonga.
City Council Minutes
January 2, 2002
Page 2
C4. Raul Delgado asked if the 210 Freeway was open.
Mayor Alexander stated there is a 7 mile stretch from Day Creek to Sierra that is currently open.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Minutes: November 7, 2001
November 21,2001
December 5, 2001 (Curatalo absent)
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/5/01 and 12/12/01 and Payroll ending 12/2/01 for the total
amount of $2,413,816.29.
D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2001.
D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Base Line
Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Lion Street to Hellman Avenue, to be funded from Account No.
11763035650/1100176 (Measure I).
RESOLUTION NO. 02-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE ROAD
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN
AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D5. Approval to summarily vacate an easement for streets, highways and related purposes along the
east side of Hermosa Avenue between 5t~ Street and 6th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 02~002
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE
VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND
RELATED PURPOSES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA
AVENUE BETWEEN 5TM STREET AND 6TM STREET
D6. Approval of authorization for the purchase of one (1) Ingersoll-Rand DD30 Self-propelled Double
Vibratory Asphalt Compactor and Trailer from Ingersoll-Rand Equipment, of Irwindale, in the amount of
$36,957.15, funded from Fund 1712-001-5603.
D7. Approval of authorization for the purchase of one (1) Ford F-350 Dual Rear Wheel Super Duty
Crew Cab Stake Bed Truck from Sunrise Ford, of Fontana, in the amount of $35,809.33, funded from
Fund 1134-303-5604.
DS. Approval of authorization for the purchase of one (1) John Deere 5220 utility tractor from AA
Equipment Rentals Co., Inc., of Montclair, in the amount of $25,877.40, funded from fund 1712-001-
5604.
D9. Approval of a Resolution supporting the passage of Proposition 42 - Traffic Congestion
Improvement Act.
City Council Minutes
January2, 2002
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 02-003
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42 -
TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT
D10. Approval to adopt the Resolution approving records retention schedules for Purchasing,
Engineering, RDA Finance, RCCF Finance and Fire Finance and minor revisions to Library and
Facilities Maintenance.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECORDS RETENTION
SCHEDULES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS
Dl1. Approval of Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688 - Daniel and Gina Shackelford - Application
to designate the Dorothy Finley House and property as a Historic Landmark, located at 7920 Valle Vista
Drive - APN: 207-081-24. Related file: Mills Act Agreement DRC2001-00727.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-005
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK
DRC2001-00688, DESIGNATING THE DOROTHY FINELY HOUSE A
HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7920 VALLE VISTA DRIVE AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 207-081-24
D12. Approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2001-00727 (CO 02-001) - Daniel and Gina Shackelford -
Request to reduce property tax on the Dorothy Finley House and property, a Historic Landmark, located
at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. Related file: Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688.
D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and release of a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 02-002) releasing Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15268 for
DR 00-24, located at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and White Birch Drive, submitted by Darrell D.
Clendenen.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-24
RESOLUTION NO. 02-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DARRELL
D. CLENDENEN
D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and release of a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 02-003) releasing Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map
15268 for DR 00-25, located at the north side of White Birch Drive, east of Elm Avenue, submitted by
Stefan A. Smith.
City Council Minutes
January 2, 2002
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 02-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-25
RESOLUTION NO. 02-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEFAN
A. SMITH
D15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash
Deposit and Ordering Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 15529, and acceptance of Offer of Dedication for
street purposes on Pilgrims Court, located at the Southern Terminus of Pilgrims Court, south of 19th
Street, submitted by Fred A. Nelson, Jr. and Urai S. Nelson.
RESOLUTION NO. 02~010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 15529,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
RESOLUTION NO. 02-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF
DEDICATION ON PILGRIMS COURT AS OFFERED FOR STREET AND
RELATED PURPOSES
RESOLUTION NO. 02-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
FOR PARCEL MAP 15529
D16. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash
Deposit, Disposition of City-owned property adjacent to Garcia Drive and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District, No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract Map
16181, and located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Garcia Drive, submitted by
SRG/Camreal, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16181,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND
MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
City Council Minutes
January 2, 2002
Page $
RESOLUTION NO. 02-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A
BURDEN ON THE CITY .OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE
DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED HEREIN
RESOLUTION NO. 02-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8
FOR TRACT MAP 16181
D17. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 02-004) from Vic Chen
th
and Lois Chen for DR 00-08, located on the northwest corner of 4 Street and Santa Anita Avenue,
submitted by Vic Chen, a Developer.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM VIC
CHEN AND LOIS CHEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME (APN: 229-331-07), FOR DR 00-08
D18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2, located on
Etiwanda Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Miller, submitted by RC Homes, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-017
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2
D19. Approval to accept Improvements, release for Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and
Material Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for CUP 97-09, submitted by Bear
Gulch, LLC, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and
Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for MDR 97-19, submitted by W9NVLA
Real Estate Limited Partnership, located at 10900 Fourth Street.
City Council Minutes
January 2, 2002
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 02-019
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 15531, submitted by Overland RC 29,
LLC, located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Mayberry Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15531 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D22. Approval of release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. B12296250 in the amount of
$12,256.64, for the ADA 1999/2000 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements at various
locations along Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, 6th Street and Arrow Route, Contract No. 00-016.
D23. Approval to accept the Construction of 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Haven Avenue to
Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 00-063 as complete, release the bonds, authorize the City Manager to file
a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $158,775.31.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 6TM STREET
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN
AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 00-063, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D24. Approval to accept the Construction of the East Avenue and Victoria Street Improvements,
Contract No. 00-035 as complete, release the bonds, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $533,370.09.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE EAST AVENUE AND
VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 00-035, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
City Council Minutes
January 2, 2002
Page ?
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR
PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY
MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-286
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is one organization that has not had the opportunity to review the
Resolution, and that even though there are no major changes, it is asked that this be continued to
January 16, 2002, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW
COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES
PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN
FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTIQN 00-286
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to continue item F1 to January 16, 2002. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST
Staff report presented by Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III. He indicated Aaron Knox was present to
answer any questions the Council might have.
Councilmember Williams inquired if any other San Bernardino area cities are supporting this.
Mr. Knox stated they are working with the San Bernardino area cities and that Montclair will be
considering this at their next meeting. He stated they are asking for Rancho Cucamonga to take the lead
and be the first to approve this.
Councilmember Williams asked about Mr. Knox's organization.
City Council Minutes
January 2, 2002
Page 8
Mr. Knox explained about their organization. He stated they are an informal organization and that they
started getting support for this in Riverside because that is where he is from.
Mayor Alexander stated SANBAG has not taken an action on this. He felt the City of San Bernardino has
a lot to gain from this.
Mr. Knox stated he does not think Orange County needs another airport. He felt San Bernardino County
needs more airports.
Councilmember Dutton stated he agrees with Mr. Knox that San Bernardino County needs their fair share
of airports. He stated if more information is needed, he is willing to wait on voting on this so the Council
can know what neighboring cities think about this.
Councilmember Biane asked if this Resolution is approved, which of the five airpods in San Bemardino
County would this benefit the most. He stated this would be planning for the future of the whole area. He
stated he would like more research done on this before he votes on it.
Councilmember Williams stated she would like to know if Rancho Cucamonga takes a leadership role in
this, what would our advantages be.
Councilmember Dutton felt everyone should unite as a region in order to make more of a statement.
Councilmember Williams suggested that Mr. Knox go to Clout meeting and give his presentation.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF INLAND EMPIRE
AIRPORTS FIRST
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to continue the item to January 16, 2002. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public.
City Council Minutes
January2, 2002
Page 9
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
Approved: *
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 1
WED, J~-N 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CC~DNZ/tLE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... pro~: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount T~pe Subs Rel To Note
AP00178090 005402 4 IMPRINT 01/09/02 459.34 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178091 004635 A AND K PHOTOGRAPHY 01/09/02 190.59 ~4W OH
AP00178092 000001 /~ EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 01/09/02 219.20 5TW OH
AP00178093 002732 A/~C LOCKSMITHS 01/09/02\~' 6.45 MW OH
AP00178094 000007 ABLETRONICS 01/09/02 38.46 MW OH
AP00178095 005871 ACCED(SOb"~HERN CALIFORNIA COU 01/09/02 25.00 MW OE
AP00178096 006309 AD,SON, RONALD 01/09/02 1,184.00 MW OH
AP00178097 004627 ALLEN'S BOOTS 01/09/02 131.56 MW OH
AP00178098 000017 ALTA FIRE EQUIPME~ CO 01/09/02 251.86 MW OH
AP00178099 005650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGIC~ ASSOC 01/09/02 3,700.00 ~5~ OH
AP00178100 001823 Sd{CH WITLESS 01/09/02 393.60 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178101 000026 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 01/09/02 10,716.35 ~ OH
AP00178102 002839 BAR CODE DISCOUNT W~REHOUSE 01/09/02 562.33 ~ OE
AP00178103 000033 BASELINE TRUE VD~LUE HARDWARE 01/09/02 18.33 ~K~ OH
AP00178104 002067 BENDER AND CO INC, ~U~TTHEW 01/09/02 56.70 ~CW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178105 001247 BLAKE PAPER CO INC 01/09/02 91.84 ~ OH
AP00178106 000703 BOB AND ED'S GLASS 01/09/02 1,500.00 MW OH
AP00178107 005859 BREthreN, CHERYL 01/09/02 50.00 MW OH
AP00178108 031911 CA DEBT ~ I~JESTMENT ADVISO 01/09/02 375.00 ~4W OH
AP00178109 005369 CAL COVER PRODUCTS 01/09/02 50.00 NS~ OE
AP00178110 021608 CALPELEA 01/09/02 195.00 MW OE
AP00178111 004203 CASHIER CDFA 01/09/02 60.50 ~ OH
AP00178112 002382 CASK N CLEAVER 01/09/02 32.00 MW OH
AP00178113 001061 CF~MPION AWARDS ~ SPECIALIE 01/09/02 518.25 MW OH
AP00178114 000713 CHICKS SPORTING GOODS INC 01/09/02 80.60 ~ OH
· CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, JAN 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CGONZA~E--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178115 000073 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 01/09/02 191.31 MW OH
AP00178116 000074 CITY R~NTALS 01/09/02 448.49 MW OH
AP00178117 006215 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY 01/09/02 224.07 MW OH
AP00178118 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 01/09/02 138.18 MW OH
AP00178119 002228 COg~3NITY BANK 01/09/02 337.47 ~ OH
AP00178120 002362 COMSERCO INC. 01/09/02 268.00 MW OH
AP00178121 006709 COPP CRUSHING, DD~N 01/09/02 100.00 MW OH
AP00178122 002456 CSUSB COLLEGE OF EXTENDED LEA 01/09/02 278.00 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178123 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 01/09/02 4,225.28 MW OH
AP00178124 005596 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSUL 01/09/02 1,280.00 MW OH
AP00178125 002512 D A R E A/~ERICA 01/09/02 1,239.44 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178126 003889 DELOI~'TE ~ TOUCHE 01/09/02 50,000.00 MW OH
AP00178127 000107 DETCO 01/09/02 49.48 MW OH
AP00178128 041177 DOLE PLUMBING INC, TIM 01/09/02 27.00 MW OH
AP00178129 008835 EAGLE LABORATORIES 01/09/02 23.00 MW OH
AP00178130 003614 ELITE TOWING 01/09/02 105.00 ~ OH
AP00178131 005137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 01/09/02 4,430.08 MW OH
AP00178132 005262 EVANS SPORTING GOODS 01/09/02 8,080.02 MW OH
AP00178133 000229 EWINO IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 01/09/02 3,015.39 MW OH
AP00178134 000779 EZ RENTALS 01/09/02 1,446.82 MW OH
AP00178135 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 01/09/02 824.80 MW OH
AP00178136 005892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 01/09/02 1,013.43 MW OH
AP00178137 004371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 01/09/02 18.38 MW OH
AP00178138 001082 FR/LNF~LIN COVEY CO 01/09/02 41.42 MW OH
AP00178139 005928 GE SUPPLY 01/09/02 1,210.58 MW OH
'CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, JAN 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~CE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178140 002482 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 01/09/02 1,397.50 MW OH
AP00178141 005787 GOLDN WEST SURPLUS 01/09/02 1,153.46 MW OH
AP00178142 003507 GOVER/~ING 01/09/02 15.00 MW OH
AP00178143 041102 GREEN FLOAT 01/09/02 1,800.00 MW OH
AP00178144 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 01/09/02 358.19 MW OH
AP00178145 080130 GUNBY ROOFING, VIC 01/09/02 10.00 MW OH
AP00178146 004525 ~L~AKER EQUIPMENT CO 01/09/02 298,226.52 MW OH
AP00178147 005821 HANSON, B~RRYE RAY 01/09/02 160.00 MW OH
AP00178148 001418 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 01/09/02 13,605.24 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178149 004845 HILLSIDE COMe,UNITY CHURCH 01/09/02 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00178150 001372 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 01/09/02 599.60 MW OH
AP00178151 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 01/09/02 284.36 MW OH
AP00178152 003276 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 01/09/02 65.47 MW OH
AP00178153 001218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 01/09/02 47.73 MW OH
AP00178154 005193 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 01/09/02 157.00 MW OH
AP00178155 001593 IN~rER~L~TIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOP 01/09/02 90.00 MW OH
AP00178156 005822 JAYAR ~NUFACTURING COMPLY 01/09/02 25.00 ~4W OH
AP00178157 000175 JOBS AVAILABLE 01/09/02 82.80 MW OH
AP00178158 000852 KOLA 01/09/02 3,800.00 ~4W OH
AP00178159 000321 LANDSCAPE WEST INC 01/09/02 2,667.50 MW OH
AP00178160 005874 LATHAbSg, DEWITT 01/09/02 30.00 MW OH
AP00178161 000197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01/09/02 450.00 MW OH
AP00178162 001005 LIL STITCH 01/09/02 1,212.68 MW OH
AP00178163 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 01/09/02 339.10 MW OH
AP00178164 003195 LITE 92.7 FM 01/09/02 1,400.00 MW OH
· CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CRECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, JAiN 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIND~NCE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... pro~: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178165 001455 LONGS DRUGS 01/09/02 57.71 MW OR
AP00178166 000749 MIJAC A~ARM COMpD~Ny 01/09/02 75.00 ~ OH
AP00178167 001020 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS ~ MIRRO 01/09/02 231.25 MW OR
AP00178168 005269 ~3LBERRY E~LY LEARiqING 01/09/02 300.00 ~ OR
AP00178169 004442 MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT 01/09/02 200.00 MW OR
AP00178170 005423 NEW PIG CORP 01/09/02 1,108.46 MW OH
AP00178171 004139 NEWSWEEK 01/09/02 24.00 MW OH
AP00178172 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/09/02 0.00 VM OR Void
AP00178173 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/09/02 4,346.37 MW OR
AP00178174 000365 OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY 01/09/02 128.19 MW OH
AP00178175 005461 ORCHARD SUPPLY ~ARDWARE 01/09/02 779.63 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178176 002921 P A P A 01/09/02 165.00 MW OH
AP00178177 004223 PAPER DIRECT INC 01/09/02 93.90 MW OH
AP00178178 004529 P~SAC 01/09/02 5,814.51 MW OR
AP00178179 006141 PC WORLD 01/09/02 24.95 MW OR
AP00178180 005824 PECK RO~ GRAVEL PIT 01/09/02 4,109.25 MW OH
AP00178181 004267 PETES RO~dD SERVICE 01/09/02 2,704.79 MW OH
AP00178182 001976 PNG TELECOM~JNICATIONS INC 01/09/02 33.03 MW OH
AP00178183 022062 POINDEXTER, TERRI 01/09/02 19.57 MW OH
AP00178184 006065 POINTS OF LIGHT FOtF~qDATION, T 01/09/02 161.90 MW OH
AP00178185 000255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 01/09/02 9,984.70 MW OR
AP00178186 001049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 01/09/02 28.58 MW OH
AP00178187 000758 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 01/09/02 61.81 MW OH
AP00178188 003286 PRINCIPAL LIFE 01/09/02 80,671.47 MW OR
AP00178189 000065 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 01/09/02 7.00 MW OH
"CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, J~N 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178190 005899 QU~LITY ONE ENGRAVING 01/09/02 68.80 MW OH
AP00178191 000345 R D O EQUIPMENT CO POWERPLAN 01/09/02 129.78 MW ON
AP00178192 001038 R J M D~SIGN ~ROUP INC 01/09/02 1,750.00 MW
AP00178193 005876 RADULASCO, DD~N 01/09/02 85.00 MW
AP00178194 000070 RANCEO CUCA~ONGA C~AMBER OF C 01/09/02 75.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178195 000170 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEE ACT 01/09/02 540.00 MW OE Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178196 006058 R3~NCEO SCREEN PRINT AND EMBRO 01/09/02 11.29 MW OE
AP00178197 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 01/09/02 333.26 MW 'ON
AP00178198 000443 P~qI CONSULTING 01/09/02 960.00 MW OE
AP00178199 004~57 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPD/~ 01/09/02 3,037.25 MW OH
AP00178200 000418 P34A GROUP 01/09/02 886.50 MW ON Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178201 006673 ROTE STAFFING COMPANIES INC 01/09/02 2,076.45
AP00178202 000454 S C C C A 01/09/02 60.00 MW
AP00178203 003896 SENECF~%L, CAL 01/09/02 193.50 MW
AP00178~04 012656 SERNA, MARCELINO 01/09/02 119.90 MW OH
AP00178205 001829 S~ARED TECENOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 01/09/02 1,249.56 MW
AP00178206 000351 SIGN SEOP, THE 01/09/02 190.75 MW OH
AP00178207 005308 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 01/09/02 63,8~8.54 MW OH
AP00178208 001327 SS~RT D_ND FI~L~L 01/09/02 27.70 MW OE
AP00178209 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 01/09/02 0.00 VM O~ Void
AP00178210 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/09/02 0.00 VM O~ Void
AP00178211 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/09/02 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00178212 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 01/09/02 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00178~13 001432 SOUTEER/~ CALIFOR/~IA EDISON 01/09/02 73,316.74 ~W
AP00178214 011860 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TURFGRASS 01/09/02 50.00 MW
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, JAN 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CGONZ~kLE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG-o-
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178215 003138 SOUTHWESTERN BAG CO 01/09/02 1,956.50 MW OH
AP00178216 005722 SPECTRA COMPANY 01/09/02 2,244.00 MW OH
AP00178217 003606 SPORTS TURF ~%NAGERS ASSOCIAT 01/09/02 85.00 MW OH
AP00178218 006343 STADIUM SELF STORAGE 01/09/02 1,050.00 MW OH
AP00178219 005144 STATE NET 01/09/02 275.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178220 005281 STERICYCLE INC 01/09/02 409.35 MW OH
AP00178221 003607 STREET TREE SENINAR 01/09/02 300.00 MW OH
AP00178222 005849 Sb/qRISE ASSISTED LIVING 01/09/02 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00178223 005849 SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING 01/09/02 4,600.00 MW OH
AP00178224 004465 T~GRAM INTERIORS 01/09/02 2,764.59 MW OH
AP00178225 000836 T~RGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 01/09/02 1,378.86 MW OR
AP00178226 002344 TARGET 01/09/02 302.49 MW OH
AP00178227 002344 TARGET 01/09/02 86.76 MW OH
AP00178228 005850 TAYLOR BALL 01/09/02 84.00 MW OH
AP00178229 004448 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 01/09/02 61.76 MW OH
AP00178230 006554 TURCH ~ ASSOCIATES, DAVID 01/09/02 8,000.00 MW OH
AP00178231 002737 U C REGENTS 01/09/02 576.00 MW OH
AP00178232 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 01/09/02 2,915.50 MW OH
AP00178233 004788 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO C 01/09/02 258.75 MW OH
AP00178234 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/09/02 100.00 MW OH
AP00178235 000358 VEND U VENDING 01/09/02 94.53 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178236 000137 VERIZON CALIFORi~IA 01/09/02 620.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178237 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/09/02 77.17 MW OH
AP00178238 005868 VIDEO GUYS 01/09/02 100.00 MW OH
AP00178239 005870 VL SYSTEMS INC 01/09/02 4,200.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
"CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/09/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 7
WED, JA~ 09, 2002, 2:21 PM --req: CGONZ~J~E--leH: GL JL--loc: FIND-NCE---job: 70111 #S039 ..... proH: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178240 092303 WALTON, KEVIN 01/09/02 426.45 MW OH
AP00178241 000213 WAXIE 01/09/02 6,~75.51 MW OH
AP00178242 004220 WILSON, BRITT 01/09/02 133.78 MW OH
AP00178243 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 01/09/02 131.86 MW OH
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 5
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 729,889.20 Number of Checks Processed: 149
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 729,889.20
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H H C K R E G I E T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, J~/~ 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37,--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A/~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178346 006451 A A~TD A AUTOMOTIVE 01/16/02 279.02 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178347 000010 A ~/~D R TIRE SERVICE 01/16/02 1,831.00 MW OH
AP00178348 000001 AA EQUIPMENT REN~rALS CO INC 01/16/02 11.24 ~Kg OH
AP00178349 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 01/16/02 334.09 ~ OH
AP00178350 001334 ABLAC 01/16/02 294.06 MW OH
AP00178351 000007 ABLETRONICS 01/16/02 281.14 MW OH
AP00178352 006628 ADD~4E, CARLOS 01/16/02 150.00 MW OH
AP00178383 006309 ~/%MSON, RONALD 01/16/02 1,920.00 ~ OH
AP00178354 001098 AG ENGINEERIN~ INC 01/16/02 717.47 ~gW OH
AP00178355 003448 ALL WELDING 01/16/02 630.10 ~ OH
AP00178356 005673 ALLEN, SYLVESTSR R 01/16/02 216.51 MW OH
AP00178357 003075 ALTA LON~% ONE ~ TWO JOINT V 01/16/02 3,000.00 ~ OH
AP00178358 001823 ARCH WIRELESS 01/16/02 2,411.19 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178359 005807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 01/16/02 3,884.00 MW OH
AP00178360 006182 ARCHITEX IN~rEP~NATIONAL 01/16/02 280.75 ~ OH
AP00178361 001291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 01/16/02 517.70 ~ OH
AP00178362 000667 ARROWHE~/D CREDIT %rNION 01/16/02 1,250.23 MW OH
AP00178363 006255 ASSI SECL~RITY 01/16/02 135.00 MW OH
AP00178364 006115 AUFBAU CORPORATION 01/16/02 22,540.00 MW OH
AP00178365 004102 B Dd~D K ELECTRIC WHOLES~J~E 01/16/02 1,979.21 ~ OH
AP00178366 006322 BALLYS LAS VEGAS 01/16/02 441.45 MW OH
AP00178367 006174 BANK OF ~RICA 01/16/02 5,497.25 MW OH
AP00178368 003914 BDL CONSTRUCTION 01/16/02 1,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00178369 006600 BERN ~3%RIES PROMOTIONAL PRODU 01/16/02 5,277.18 MW OH
AP00178370 001247 BI~L~E PAPER CO INC 01/16/02 45.68 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C B E c K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2
WED, J~/~ 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINA~CE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CY~REG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check D~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178371 005266 BOBS CD/~DIES INC 01/16/02 913.44 MW OH
AP00178372 002209 BRUCE, INGRID 01/16/02 109.00 MW OH
AP00178373 002161 BUSINESS /LND LEGAL REPORTS IN 01/16/02 271.90 MW OH
AP00178374 003263 C D S TECHNOLOGIES INC 01/16/02 2,623.00 MW OB
AP00178375 006280 CA DEPT OF TPQ%NSPORTATION PUB 01/16/02 10.00 MW ON
AP00178376 003475 CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST 01/16/02 38,057.74 MW OH
AP00178377 004735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 01/16/02 155.69 MW OH
AP00178378 001223 CALSENSE 01/16/02 816.24 MW OB
AP00178379 005683 C~24ACHO, P, ALFL 01/16/02 250.00 MW OH
AP00178380 005580 CARLOS FAPuMS 01/16/02 1,000.00 ~ OH
AP00178381 004063 CDG ~TERIALS INC 01/16/02 313.75 ~ OH
AP00178382 000068 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 01/16/02 1,552.78 MW OB
AP00178383 000947 CHARTER COMS~3NICATIONS 01/16/02 57.75 MW OB
AP00178384 004482 CHEN, WENDELL 01/16/02 1,000.00 ~K~ OH AR
AP00178385 000074 CITY RENTALS 01/16/02 740.76 ~ OH
AP00178386 002470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 01/16/02 387.90 MW OH
AP00178387 002228 CO~V~/NITY B/LNK 01/16/02 20.02 MW OH
AP00178388 002362 COMSERCO INC. 01/16/02 242.53 MW OH
AP00178389 001328 CONC2%N~NON, S~L~RI 01/16/02 199.50 MW OH
AP00178390 006709 COPP CRUSHING, D~/~ 01/16/02 80.00 MW OH
AP00178391 006185 COTTLE, ALA/~ 01/16/02 20.00 MW OH
AP00178392 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 01/16/02 118.50 554 OH
AP00178393 001321 COURT TRUSTEE 01/16/02 200.00 MW OH
AP00178394 090303 CSFA 01/16/02 50.00 MW OH
AP00178395 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/16/02 0.00 %q4 OH Void
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, JA~ 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 71362 #E030 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178396 000085 CUCDJ4ONGA CO WATER DIET 01/16/02 12,095.90 MW OH
AP00178397 005596 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSUL 01/16/02 1,024.00 MW OH
AP00178398 000604 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 01/16/02 2,100.00 MW OH
AP00178399 000239 D ~ K CONCRETE COMPA/~y 01/16/02 1,740.44 MW OH
AP00178400 000105 DA~ GUERRA ~%ND ASSOCIATES 01/16/02 31,032.00 MW OH
AP00178401 005063 DELAMORA, M~RIO 01/16/02 70.00 MW OH
AP00178402 003909 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 01/16/02 10,390.88 MW OH
AP00178403 000107 DETCO 01/16/02 133.67 MW OH
AP00178404 001551 DFM ASSOCIATES 01/16/02 42.90 MW OH
AP00178405 004544 DICK, ERIC 01/16/02 75.00 MW OH
AP00178406 004544 DICK, ERIC 01/16/02 332.50 MW OH
AP00178407 005809 DIETERICH POST COMPANy 01/16/02 215.51 MW OH
AP00178408 003307 DMS LANDSCAPE SERVICES 01/16/02 2,373.80 MW OH
AP00178409 003875 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 01/16/02 451.68 MW OH
AP00178410 004205 DYND~4IC GRAPHICS INC 01/16/02 84.95 MW OH
AP00178411 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 01/16/02 45.15 MW OR
AP00178412 005937 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 01/16/02 100.00 MW OH
AP00178413 090520 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 01/16/02 4,582.72 MW OH
AP00178414 005149 ESCOBAR, JONATH/~N 01/16/02 35.00 MW OH
AP00178415 004468 ESCOBAR, SANTIAGO 01/16/02 35.00 MW OH
AP00178416 000977 ESRI INC 01/16/02 1,532.08 MW OH
AP00178417 005521 EXPERIA/~ 01/16/02 54.00 MW OH
AP00178418 005917 FASTENAL COMPS%NY 01/16/02 129.20 MW OH
AP00178419 000666 FILAMENT PRO AUDIO 01/16/02 15,579.77 MW OH
AP00178420 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 01/16/02 7,820.90 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, JAN 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~-NCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~%mount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178421 006532 FLORES, ~TURO /~R~D DI~NA 01/16/02 25,380.50 NSg OH
AP00178422 000526 FOOTHILL C~PET ~dgD ~L~7~RESS 01/16/02 750.00 ~g OH
AP00178423 001082 FR3~NKLIN COVEY CO 01/16/02 55.58 MW OH
AP00178424 006074 FUKUSHI~, JUDITH 01/16/02 1,065.00 ~5~ OH
AP00178425 000260 G D2gD M BUSINESS INTERIORS 01/16/02 1,339.45 F~ OH
AP00178426 006232 GADABOL~f TOURS INC 01/16/02 1,438.20 MW OH
AP00178427 006567 GATES, SARAH 01/16/02 30.00 Nf4 OH
AP00178428 000650 GRAINGER, WW 01/16/02 462.21 ~W OH
AP00178429 003827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 01/16/02 86.27 MW OH
AP00178430 001355 GWYNN, CHRIS 01/16/02 3,700.00 F~W OH
AP00178431 000462 HCS C~LER STEEL CO 01/16/02 78.00 MW OH
AP00178432 005572 HERNANDEZ, JOSE DE JESUS 01/16/02 240.00 MW OH
AP00178433 001624 HIX DEVELOPMEBFf 01/16/02 2,550.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178434 000158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 01/16/02 2,596.32 MW OH
AP00178435 002255 HOLTS AUTO ELECTRIC 01/16/02 263.38 MW OH
AP00178436 001234 HOSE ~ INC 01/16/02 127.33 MW OH
AP00178437 000161 HOYT LL~4BER CO, S M 01/16/02 806.25 Ff~ OH
AP00178438 001325 HURST, CHERYL 01/16/02 313.50 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178439 004891 HYDROLYNX SYSTEMS 01/16/02 3,537.70 F~ OH
AP00178440 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 01/16/02 371.69 ~ OH
AP00178441 006513 IAP~L~ 01/16/02 50.00 ~ OH
AP00178442 004254 IBM CORPORATION 01/16/02 838.99 ~ OH
AP00178443 003276 ICI Db-LUX PAINT CENTERS 01/16/02 1,280.97 ~ OH
AP00178444 004188 ID BURR 01/16/02 2,377.80 ~ OH
AP00178445 005070 IFEA 01/16/02 295.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C B E C E R E G I S T E R CHECK ~GISTER page 5
WED, JAN 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN/~NCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... proD: CE200 <l.37>--report id: CYd~EG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~Jnount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178446 000607 IKON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 01/16/0~ 250.00 N~ OH Payee Name different in Che~k DB
AP00178447 000092 INLD/qD VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 01/16/02 1,483.00 ~ OH
AP00178448 002315 INLAND W~OLESALE Nq3RSERY 01/16/02 79.81 ~K~ OH
AP00178449 090933 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 01/16/02 38.65 ~ OH
AP00178450 003452 INTPQ%VAIA ROCK D/~D SA/~D 01/16/02 3,624.95 MW OH
AP00178451 005147 IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION 01/16/02 25.00 MW OH
AP00178452 001941 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON 01/16/02 34.06 ~ OH
AP00178453 006282 KABIR, ZABI 01/16/02 152.00 ~W OB
AP00178454 004072 KCS COMPD/qY 01/16/02 24,483.37 ~5~ OH
Ap00178455 001024 KOCH N~kTERIALS COMP~/~Y 01/16/02 110.73 MW OB
AP00178456 000321 I~NDSCAPE WEST INC 01/16/02 5,661.00 ~ OH
AP00178457 003367 LEMON, ROBERT 01/16/02 500.55 MW OB
AP00178458 005287 LEON, LUIS 01/16/02 105.00 MW OB
AP00178459 005662 LOS ~GELES COCA COLA BTL CO 01/16/02 216.50 MW OB
AP00178460 001336 LOWER, DARLENE 01/16/02 251.00 MW OB
AP00178461 000549 Nk~RIPOSA HORTICULTUR~%L ENT IN 01/16/02 7,289.55 MW OB
AP00178462 000072 MARK CHRIS INC 01/16/02 47.35 MW OH
AP00178463 004727 ~L~RSHALL PLUMBING 01/16/02 302.77 MW OH
AP00178464 008375 MASTER BUILDING SPECIALTIES 01/16/02 1,707.00 5f6 OH
AP00178465 001025 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMP~/qY 01/16/02 204.34 MW OH
AP00178466 002198 MICHA2~LS STORES INC 3019 01/16/02 313.89 ~ OH
AP00178467 006170 MICROAGE COMPL~fEPJ4ART 01/16/02 450.88 MW OB
AP00178468 003860 MOBILE MINI INC 01/16/02 340.31 MW OB
AP00178469 003316 MR TS 24HR TOWING 01/16/02 110.00 MW OB
AP00178470 004442 M~/NICIPAL ~GSMEN~ 01/16/02 50.00 ~5~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS {PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 6
WED, JD=N 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178471 001332 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE 01/16/02 13.85 MW OH
AP00178472 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 01/16/02 635.65 MW OH
AP00178473 002837 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 01/16/02 128.40 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178474 000744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 01/16/02 22,909.74 MW OH
AP00178475 006687 NATIONS RENT 01/16/02 61.82 MW OR
AP00178476 002090 NBSGOVERNMENT FISUtNCE GROUP 01/16/02 1,222.00 MW OH
AP00178477 002361 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 01/16/02 385.00 MW OH
AP00178478 004527 NIRPOUR, MO}{D~v~ED 01/16/02 315.00 MW OH
AP00178479 000606 NITE ~ DAYBEDS ETC 01/16/02 1,229.69 MW OH
AP00178480 000433 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 01/16/02 143.38 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178481 000712 NORRIS REPKE INC 01/16/02 2,792.50 MW OH
AP00178482 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/16/02 2,354.79 MW OH
AP00178483 032135 OLYMPIC TREE SALES 01/16/02 500.00 MW OH AR
AP00178484 000232 O~ITRANS 01/16/02 360.00 MW OH
AP00178485 004904 OTT, LAURA 01/16/02 442.00 MW OH
AP00178486 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 01/16/02 4,355.86 MW OH
AP00178487 000336 PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION 01/16/02 118.69 MW OH
AP00178488 006287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 01/16/02 41,474.56 MW OH
AP00178489 000818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC 01/16/02 200.12 MW OH
AP00178490 000487 PATTON SALES CORP 01/16/02 24.40 MW OH
AP00178491 000757 PEP BOYS 01/16/02 35.45 MW OH
AP00178492 006522 PERALTA, GIO 01/16/02 200.00 MW OH
AP00178493 004656 PEREZ, HECTOR 01/16/02 255.00 MW OH
AP00178494 006205 PETERMAN LUMBER 01/16/02 110.70 MW OH
AP00178495 004267 PETES ROA/D SERVICE 01/16/02 559.95 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7
WED, JAiN 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHHR--leg: GL JL--loc: FIRL~NCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... pro~: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178496 007209 PINCOTT, JOHN 01/16/02 300.00 MW OH
AP00178497 000272 PITNEY BOWES 01/16/02 1,336.83 MW OH
AP00178498 006206 PLA/~NING CENTER, THE 01/16/02 4,082.21 MW OH
AP00178499 005331 POLFP~{ASSANI;~N, ABBY 01/16/02 35.00 MW OH
AP00178500 000758 PR/%XAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 01/16/02 78.26 MW OH
AP00178501 004968 PREMIER RANCHO CUCAMONGA LTD 01/16/02 30,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00178502 002533 PRENTICE HALL 01/16/02 49.94 MW OH
AP00178503 004633 QUICK BUYS 01/16/02 739.60 MW OH
AP00178504 001323 QUINTDlgA, ZITA 01/16/02 193.00 MW OH
AP00178505 005876 RkDULASCO, DA/g 01/16/02 315.00 MW OH
AP00178506 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 01/16/02 75.41 MW OH
AP00178507 000070 RANCHO CUCA~4ONGA C~Ln34BER OF C 01/16/02 30.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178508 006294 RANCHO RAIL DEVELOPERS 01/16/02 462.00 MW OH
AP00178509 006058 PJ%NCHO SCREEN PRI~ ~ EMBRO 01/16/02 43.00 MW OH
AP00178510 002257 Pu%ULS AUtO TRIM INC 01/16/02 195.00 MW OH
AP00178511 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 01/16/02 150.00 MW OH
AP00178512 004472 REDINGER, TOM 01/16/02 175.00 MW OH
AP00178513 005665 REGULATION COMPLI~CE INC 01/16/02 55.00 MW OH
AP00178514 001324 REINHARDTSEN, DEBP~A 01/16/02 282.50 MW OH
AP00178515 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 01/16/02 298.36 MW OH
AP00178516 000443 RHI CONSULTING 01/16/02 960.00 MW OH
AP00178517 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 01/16/02 15.80 MW OH
AP00178518 001322 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 01/16/02 226.00 MW OH
AP00178519 004257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMP~_N 01/16/02 180.20 MW OH
AP00178520 000418 RMA GROUP 01/16/02 3,000.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page
WED, JAN 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND-NCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKP~G---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178521 000626 ROBLEE SR, RAUL p 01/16/02 468.00 MW OH
AP00178522 005570 RODRIGUEZ, OSC~R 01/16/02 300.00 MW OH
AP00178523 004978 ROIG, WILLI~ 01/16/02 115.00 MW OR
AP00178524 000016 ROTARY CORPORATION 01/16/02 406.27 MW OH
AP00178525 006673 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 01'/16/02 408.00 MW OH
AP00178526 002082 ROYAL WROLESALE ELECTRIC 01/16/02 295.50 MW OH
AP00178527 006770 SAFEWAY SIGN 01/16/02 289.72 MW OR
AP00178528 005538 SA~ D2qTONIO MATERIALS 01/16/02 254.13 MW OH
AP00178529 001590 SAN BERN COUNTy CHILD SUPPORT 01/16/02 200.00 MW OH
AP00178530 001590 SD~N BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 01/16/02 289.68 MW OH
AP00178531 000150 SAN BERN COUNTy 01/16/02 130,970.40 ~Sg OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178532 000150 SAN BERN COUIgTY 01/16/02 55.00 ~ OH Payee Name different in Cheek DB
AP00178533 000150 SD~N BERN COUNTY 01/16/02 11.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178534 000150 S;~N BERN COLrNTy 01/16/02 19,625.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178535 005338 SA/~ BERND2~DINO COLrNTY 01/16/02 23,373.50 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178536 000132 S~ DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 01/16/02 193.50 MW OH
AP00178537 001441 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 01/16/02 6,787.72 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178538 004980 SCIORTINO, NICOLAS 01/16/02 105.00 M~g OH
AP00178539 001829 SHARED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 01/16/02 732.00 MW OH
AP00178540 004186 SHIRLEY ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 01/16/02 1,559.09 MW OH
AP00178541 002009 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CON 01/16/02 56,538.00 MW OH
AP00178542 004305 SIERRA WHOLESALE HARDWARE INC 01/16/02 149.50 MW OH
AP00178543 000351 SIGN SHOP, THE 01/16/02 388.73 MW OH
AP00178544 001327 SMART AND FINAL 01/16/02 1,000.21 MW OH
AP00178545 000319 $O CALIF GAS COMPLY 01/16/02 4,944.17 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, JA/g 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178546 011861 SOROKOWSKI, JON 01/16/02 500.00 MW OH
AP00178547 000987 SOUTH COAST AQMD 01/16/02 510.01 MW OE
AP00178548 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub 01/16/02 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00178549 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/16/02 7,976.51 MW OH
AP00178550 005722 SPECTRA COMP~/gY 01/16/02 8,818.00 MW OH
AP00178551 004176 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 01/16/02 2,138.00 MW OH
AP00178552 004176 STATE BOndeD OF EQU~kLIZATION 01/16/02 69.04 MW OH
AP00178553 001335 STATE OF CALIFOP~NIA FRANCHISE 01/16/02 49.65 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178554 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 01/16/02 10,130.05 MW OH
AP00178555 004132 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 01/16/02 98.30 MW OH
AP00178556 007256 STOFA, JOSEPH 01/16/02 25.00 MW OH
AP00178557 004733 SUNRISE FORD 01/16/02 251.64 ~ OH
AP00178858 005410 T D/gD D INSTALLATIONS 01/16/02 1,149.51 MW OH
AP00178559 005801 TA/~NER, JO~ 01/16/02 200.00 MW OH
AP00178560 003735 T/LNNER, O C 01/16/02 580.91 ~ OH
AP00178561 000836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 01/16/02 5,961.00 MW OH'
AP00178562 002344 TARGET 01/16/02 162.08 MW OH
AP00178563 005311 TBC RA/gCHO CUCAMONGA III 01/16/02 15,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00178564 004578 TELEWORKS 01/16/02 13,942.50 MW OH
AP00178568 003942 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 01/16/02 403.00 MW OH
AP00178566 003388 TRUGREEN LANDC~E REGIONA~L 01/16/02 7,992.50 MW OH
AP00178567 005155 U S BANK TRUST 01/16/02 500.00 MW OH
AP00178568 000350-1 U S POSTgL~STER 01/16/02 750.00 MW OH
AP00178569 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/16/02 92.51 MW OH
AP00178570 002682 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 01/16/02 4,500.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10
WED, J~/~ 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FINI~NCE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check ~Jnount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178571 003473 LSgITED TRAFFIC 01/16/02 280.42 MW OH
AP00178572 000919 UNITED WAY 01/16/02 632.32 MW OH
AP00178573 006004 U/gITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 01/16/02 8,395.03 ~ OH
AP00178574 004296 UPSCO 01/16/02 577.28 MW OH
AP00178575 006571 URB~/~ CROSSROADS INC 01/16/02 210.00 ~K~ OH
AP00178576 005009 VELASQUEZ, CARLOS 01/16/02 140.00 ~ OH
AP00178577 VOID.CON~IN~J Void - Continued Stub 01/16/02 0.00 VM OH Void
AP00178578 000137 VERIZON CALIFOR~IA 01/16/02 4,968.36 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178579 000137 VERIZON C~LIFORNIA 01/16/02 11,939.99 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178580 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/16/02 77.82 FS~ OH
AP00178581 001103 VISTA PAIN~ 01/16/02 420.62 ~ OH
AP00178582 001329 VOLM, LIZA 01/16/02 112.50 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178583 000213 WDS(IE 01/16/02 3,271.22 MW OH
AP00178584 005222 WHITE CAP 01/16/02 158.82 MW OH
AP00178585 005658 X PECT FIRST AID D/gD SAFETY 01/16/02 349.66 MW OH
AP00178586 004624 YEE, I~RRY 01/16/02 355.00 5TW OH
AP00178587 000348 ZEP ~Lgi~JFACTLrRING COMPD/gy 01/16/02 635.94 ~Sq OH
AP00178588 004562 ZL~4AR INqDUSTRIES INC 01/16/02 299.66 ~ OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/16/02 c H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11
WED, JAN 16, 2002, 3:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/~CE---job: 71362 #S030 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKP~G---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date ' Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 3
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 782,188.00 Number o~ Checks Processed: 240
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number o~ Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 782,188.00
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1
WED, JAN 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~/gCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178639 006791 411 PUBLISHING 01/23/02 80.34 MW OH
AP00178640 000010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 01/23/02 2,278.45 MW OH
AP00178641 000001 AA EQUIPMENT RENTD-LS CO INC 01/23/02 55.90 MW OH
AP00178642 006271 ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES 01/23/02 1,136.60 MW OH
AP00178643 002732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 01/23/02 671.19 MW OH
AP00178644 006011 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 01/23/02 221.47 MW OH
AP00178645 000007 ABLETRONICS 01/23/02 57.97 MW OH
AP00178646 006309 ADANSON, RONALD 01/23/02 2,688.00 MW OH
AP00178647 005231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 01/23/02 515.00 MW OH
AP00178648 003695 AHUJA, JASPAL 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178649 003448 ~L WELDING 01/23/02 1,112.63 MW OH
AP00178650 005409 ~4ERICA~ PLUMBING PARTSMASTER 01/23/02 377.97 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178651 002693 ~-MTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 01/23/02 374.78 MW OH
AP00178652 001823 ARCH WIRELESS 01/23/02 666.15 ~W OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178653 005118 AR~4A IN~fERlg~TION~L INC 01/23/02 350.00 ~ OH
AP00178654 000667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 01/23/02 2,357.78 MW OH
AP00178655 006255 ASSI SECURITY 01/23/02 1,720.00 MW OH
AP00178656 000026 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 01/23/02 7,770.00 MW OH
AP00178657 006768 BACA, CHRISTINE 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178658 006789 BACK STAGE WEST 01/23/02 45.00 MW OH
AP00178659 001040 BAKER, DUkNE 01/23/02 36.00 MW OH
AP00178660 004475 BARNES ~ NOBLE 01/23/02 200.00 MW OH
AP00178661 002981 BEARD PROVENCHER ~ND ASSOC 01/23/02 1,798.00 MW OH
AP00178662 006767 BLA/~K, CHRIS 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178663 006769 BOCOCK, MARGARET 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C E E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 2
WED, J~/q 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178664 006774 EOGUSKI, REGINA 01/23/02 72.00 ~5~ OH
AP00178665 006772 BOLIN, KELLIE 01/23/02 30.00 FS~ OH
AP00178666 003262 BRICKLEY EAV~IRONMENTAL 01/23/02 10,595.00 ~4W OH
AP00178667 021749 BRIDGES, KITTY 01/23/02 60.00 MW
AP00178668 005341 BUCKN~J~ ~2gD ASSOCIATES 01/23/02 1,825.15 MW OH
AP00178669 006778 CABREP3~, IRENE 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178670 001408 CACE 01/23/02 190.00 MW OH
AP00178671 005156 CAGLES APPLI~.NCE 01/23/02 1,102.07 MW OH
AP00178672 006773 CAMPOS, ELIZABETH 01/23/02 50.00 MW OH
AP00178673 006780 CAPE 2002 CONFERENCE 01/23/02 150.00 MW OH
AP00178674 006470 CARR, JO~FN 01/23/02 250.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178675 004288 CAR-q, P~34 01/23/02 68.00 ~4W OH
AP00178676 001109 CATELLUS DEVELOPMEN~ CORP. 01/23/02 103.37 MW OH
AP00178677 021822 CCPOA 01/23/02 30.00 ~W OH
AP00178678 000266 CERTIFIED ALamO CARE 01/23/02 385.01
AP00178679 000069 C~AFFEY JOIN~F UNION HS DISTRI 01/23/02 3,863.92 ~ OH
AP00178680 006052 CH3~RTER MEDIA 01/23/02 2,222.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178681 000488 CEEVRON USA INC 01/23/02 72.59 MW OH
AP00178682 004323 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 01/23/02 4,175.87 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178683 000073 CITRUS MOTORS O~ARIO INC 01/23/02 1,088.87 MW OH
AP00178684 00317 CLAEYS, MICRAEL 01/23/02 109,924.62
AP00178685 005050 CLEMENT CO~3NICATIONS INC 01/23/02 215.28 5~W OH
AP00178686 004949 CLOUT 01/23/02 96.00 MW OH
AP00178687 002845 CRR3~ 01/23/02 131.00 ~W
AP00178688 VOID.CONTIA~3 Void - Continued Stub 01/23/02 0.00 VM OH Void
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 3
WED, J~/~ 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIND-NCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178689 000085 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 01/23/02 9,509.62 ~g~ OH
AP00178690 005596 CUCD~4ONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSUL 01/23/02 ~,400.00 ~5~ OH
AP00178691 006776 CL~NNING~L~, TIM 01/23/02 63.00 MW OH
AP00178692 002512 D A R E ~3~ERICA 01/23/02 297.17 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178693 000239 D ~ K CONCRETE COMPANy 01/23/02 1,924.28 MW OH
AP00178694 002478 DAPPER TIRE CO 01/23/02 140.24 MW OH
AP00178695 002882 DBX INC 01/23/02 8,374.00 MW OH
AP00178696 006302 DE~/~ INC, STUART 01/23/02 3,937.50 ~ ' OH
AP00178697 006793 DEAN, CASSIE 01/23/02 36.00 5~W OH
AP00178698 001290 DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER 01/23/02 24.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178699 005846 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 01/23/02 6,111.00 MW OH
AP00178700 004366 DEMCO INC 01/23/02 463.19 MW OH
AP00178701 006467 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 01/23/02 2,103.86 ~ OH
AP00178702 005378 DOCTOR CONCRETE 01/23/02 48.00 MW OH
AP00178703 004205 DYN~34IC GRAPHICS INC 01/23/02 58.95 MW OE
AP00178704 006794 EATON, ED 01/23/02 10.00 MW OH
AP00178705 004081 EDWAP~DS, SHERYL 01/23/02 12.00 MW OH
AP00178706 003364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 01/23/02 1,910.62 ~ OE
AP00178707 003614 ELITE TOWING 01/23/02 50.50 ~ OH
AP00178708 005937 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING 01/23/02 350.00 MW OH
AP00178709 004436 EPIXTECH INC 01/23/02 402.85 MW OH
AP00178710 002349 ESGIL CORPOR3~TION 01/23/02 30,604.70 ~4W OH
AP00178711 000123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 01/23/02 246.21 MW OH
AP00178712 006795 FIGUEROA ALJ~NIZ, CI~D¥ 01/23/02 60~00 ~ OH
AP00178713 000155 FILARSKY ~ND WATT 01/23/02 4,675.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4
WED, J;%N 22, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check D~nount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178714 006556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 01/23/02 1,612.80 MW OH
AP00178715 006796 FLORES, RON 01/23/02 59.00 MW OH
AP00178716 004762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 01/23/02 250.00 MW OH
AP00178717 002840 FORD OF UPLAND INC 01/23/02 25.81 MW OH
AP00178718 003356 GARCIA, VIVI~/q 01/23/02 23.46 MW OH
AP00178719 006797 GAYT~, JOHN 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178720 005928 GE SUPPLY 01/23/02 661.40 MW
AP00178721 005955 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 01/23/02 59.84 MW OH
AP00178722 000650 GRAINGER, WW 01/23/02 46.44 MW OH
AP00178723 001984 GRIGOLLA ~ SONS CONST INC 01/23/02 61,389.90 MW OH
AP00178724 090817 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 01/23/02 1,661.52 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178725 004852 HOPKINS, LORI 01/23/02 500.00 5fW OB
AP00178726 002284 HL~4ANSCALE CORPORATION 01/23/02 213.30 MW OH
AP00178727 006764 HYATT NEWPORTER HOTEL 01/23/02 174.00 MW OH
AP00178728 000495 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 01/23/02 79.92 MW OH
AP00178729 004254 IBM CORPORATION 01/23/02 1,658.51 MW OH
AP00178730 003276 ICI DULUX PAINT CEN~ERS 01/23/02 556.90 MW OH
AP00178731 004188 ID BURR 01/23/02 159.21 MW OH
AP00178732 005682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDIC~L GRO 01/23/02 1,076.00 MW OH
AP00178733 000092 INLA~D VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 01/23/02 654.78 MW OH
AP00178734 002315 INLAND WHOLESALE N~RSERY 01/23/02 139.75 MW OH
AP00178735 006345 INTEL NETWORK SYSTEMS 01/23/02 78.36 'MW OH
AP00178736 090931 I~ERNATIONAL FIRE CODE INSTI 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178737 090933 IN~fERSTATE BATTERIES 01/23/02 138.43 MW OH
AP00178738 005147 IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION 01/23/02 50.00 MW
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5
WED, JA/~ 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~%NCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178739 002392 IV~A 01/23/02 135.00 MW OH
AP00178740 006765 JACOBSON, KENNETH 01/23/02 50.00 MW OH
AP00178741 032717 JANIKOWSKI, BETH 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178742 006193 KLAMATH BAY 01/23/02 498.09 MW OH
AP00178743 004982 KOR~LNDA CONSTRUCTION 01/23/02 894.40 MW OH
AP00178744 006779 KRUGER, RAy 01/23/02 30.00 ~ OH
AP00178745 006781 L~d~AR, TINA 01/23/02 33.00 MW OH
AP00178746 000195 I~NCE SOLL ~ LUNGHARD 01/23/02 6,728.76 MW OH
AP00178747 000197 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178748 006045 LEGAL DEFENSE FUNqD 01/23/02 168.00 MW OH
AP00178749 000574 LEWIS, QUELYNN 01/23/02 55.00 MW OH
AP00178750 005884 LILBURN CORPORATION 01/23/02 16,245.55 MW O~
AP00178751 003195 LITE 92.7 FM 01/23/02 1,600.00 MW OH
AP00178752 005274 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 01/23/02 225.00 MW OH
AP00178753 005672 LIU, BENNY CHENG CHUNG 01/23/02 250.00 MW OH AR
AP00178754 030436 LOS A/~GELES BUSINESS JOURNAL 01/23/02 89.95 MW OH
AP00178755 004941 LUCKETT ROOFING CO 01/23/02 3,200.00 MW OH
AP00178756 006801 LURIE, NATALIE 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178757 000549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT IN 01/23/02 18,439.40 MW OH
AP00178758 005851 MARKETING SERVICES INTL 01/23/02 82.40 MW OH
AP00178759 004727 MARSHALL PLUMBING 01/23/02 222.00 MW OH
AP00178760 000250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 01/23/02 360.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DE
AP00178761 003871 MATT'S ~ARDWARE 01/23/02 24.91 MW OH
AP00178762 004374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 01/23/02 136.17 MW OH
AP00178763 006783 MONROE, JOANNE 01/23/02 55.00 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6
WED, JAN 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--ieg: GL JL--loc: FIN~%NCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178764 005885 MORITA, DU~E 01/23/02 6,414.00 MW OH
AP00178765 002248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 01/23/02 983.42 ~W OH
AP00178766 032343 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 01/23/02 25.00 MW OH
AP00178767 002837 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 01/23/02 128.40 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178768 001035 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC p 01/23/02 20.00 MW OH
AP00178769 000433 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 01/23/02 1,397.66 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178770 006786 NO~Wu%/q, CI~LrDIA 01/23/02 45.00 MW OE
AP00178771 000523 OFFICE DEPOT 01/23/02 1,662.75 MW OH
AP00178772 091503 OLD BALDY COLrNCIL 43 01/23/02 263.20 MW OH
AP00178773 005056 OLIVAS, BI~A~CA 01/23/02 144.00 MW OH
AP00178774 005461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 01/23/02 82.74 ~5~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178775 006787 OROZCO, ROY 01/23/02 36.00 ~ OH
AP00178776 004904 OTT, ~AURA 01/23/02 446.50 MW OH
AP00178777 006804 OTT, S~L~RON 01/23/02 70.00 ~ OH
AP00178778 000235 OWEN ELECTRIC 01/23/02 85.45 ~ OH
AP00178779 000487 PATTON SALES CORP 01/23/02 149.86 MW OH
AP00178780 006798 PAVONE, SUSAN 01/23/02 60.00 ~ OH
AP00178781 000757 PEP BOYS 01/23/02 93.87 MW OH
AP00178782 006205 PETEPdvk~N LU~BER 01/23/02 131.12 MW OH
AP00178783 006799 PETERS, JULIE 01/23/02 36.00 MW OH
AP00178784 000255 PO~ DISTRIBL~iNG CO 01/23/02 16,402.79 MW OH
AP00178785 001049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 01/23/02 3,254.95 MW OH
AP00178786 000758 PRAY~IR DISTRIB~ION INC 01/23/02 131.21 MW OH
AP00178787 005264 PROACTIVE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION 01/23/02 1,960.00 ~ OH
AP00178788 003444 PROJECT SISTER 01/23/02 2,919.70 ~4W OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 7
WED, JAN 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN~-NCE~--job: 72222 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178789 000065 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 01/23/02 35.00 MW OH
AP00178790 000251 R ~ND R AUTOMOTIVE 01/23/02 1,816.61 MW OH
AP00178791 000345 R D O EQUIPMENT CO POWERPI2~N 01/23/02 107.08 MW OH
AP00178792 002705 R H F INC 01/23/02 562.68 MW OH
AP00178793 011862 RAGA/~ CO~4UNICATIONS 01/23/02 27.27 ~W OH
AP00178794 005174 R3~NCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 01/23/02 1,500.00 MW OH
AP00178795 006501 REED, JOHN 01/23/02 1,000.00 MW OH
AP00178796 005914 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 01/23/02 583.20 MW OH
AP00178797 005618 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 01/23/02 19,761.22 MW OH
AP00178798 006757 HI~GANS, BARBARA 01/23/02 63.00 MW OH
AP00178799 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 01/23/02 331.66 MW OH
AP00178800 006758 ROQUE, MICHELLE 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178801 006673 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 01/23/02 272.00 MW OH
AP00178802 001004 S ~ S WORLDWIDE 01/23/02 41.42 MW OH
AP00178803 001852 S C E S A 01/23/02 75.00 MW OH
AP00178804 005745 SAFELITE GI2~SS CORP 01/23/02 59.95 MW OH
AP00178805 003137 SAFETY CENTER 01/23/02 750.00 MW OH
AP00178806 000301 S~ BEP~N COUNTY SHERIFFS 01/23/02 1023,181.00 MW OH
AP00178807 000301 S~N BERi~ COLFNTy SHERIFFS 01/23/02 48.00 MW OH
AP00178808 000300 S~ BEP~N COI3NTY 01/23/02 1,200.00 MW OH
AP00178809 003249 S~ BERN COUNTy 01/23/02 30.00 MW ON
AP00178810 000150 S~ BERN COUNTy 01/23/02 48.95 MW ON Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178811 006763 S~NATGAR, BENNAZ 01/23/02 55.00 MW ON
AP00178812 006702 S~CHEZ, JOE 01/23/02 89.00 MW OH
AP00178813 001441 SBC/PACIFIC BELL 01/23/02 1,465.17 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 81/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8
WED, JAN 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~/qCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178814 004350 SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN 01/23/02 32.46 MW
AP00178815 008089 SCEOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 01/23/02 500.00 MW OH
AP00178816 006432 SCTC INSTITUTE 01/23/02 50.00 MW OH
AP00178817 006756 SILVER, WENDY 01/23/02 36.00 MW OH
AP00178818 001644 SIMAC CONSTRUCTION 01/23/02 2,000.00 MW OE AR
AP00178819 001327 SMART ~ FINAL 01/23/02 440.98 MW OH
AP00178820 006785 SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL ARBORIST 01/23/02 50.00 MW OH
AP00178821 001825 SOFT CHOICE CORP 01/23/02 1,582.40 MW OH
AP00178822 006784 SOFTVIEW CALIFORNIA INC 01/23/02 213.31 MW OH
AP00178823 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 01/23/02 9,829.06 MW OH
AP00178824 005722 SPECTRA COMP~%iqY 01/23/02 3,230.00 MW OH
AP00178825 006728 SPECTRA CONTRACT FLOORING:ORA 01/23/02 325.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB
AP00178826 003937 STA/qDAP~D AND POORS 01/23/02 298.00 MW OH
AP00178827 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 01/23/02 47,486.47 MW OH
AP00178828 003632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDA 01/23/02 708.33 MW OH
AP00178829 006029 STRESS LESS ENVIRONMENTAL 01/23/02 1,400.00 MW OH
AP00178830 006355 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 01/23/02 7,216.39 MW OH
AP00178831 006754 SUT~L~R, CHRISTINE 01/23/02 36.00 MW OH
AP00178832 011963 SYS ~2DMIN 01/23/02 73.00 MW OH
AP00178833 003942 TER~4INIX INTERNATIONAL 01/23/02 722.00 MW OH
AP00178834 006788 THEATER CO~5~/NICATIONS GROUP 01/23/02 28.00 MW OH
AP00178835 006792 TIERRA DEL SOL 01/23/02 93.00 MW OH
AP00178836 004351 TOBIN, RENEE 01/23/02 29.94 MW OH
AP00178837 006790 TOMRA PACIFIC INC 01/23/02 236.80 MW OH
AP00178838 004448 TRE~DWAY GR3~PHICS 01/23/02 210.41 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 9
WED, JAN 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGON?J~LE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN~%NCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178839 000350-1 U S POSTMASTER 01/23/02 170.00 MW OH
AP00178840 001857 UMALI, YVONNE 01/23/02 23.00 MW OH
AP00178841 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 01/23/02 3,663.00 MW OH
AP00178842 003437 UNIFIRST b~NIFORM SERVICE 01/23/02 2,701.84 MW OH
AP00178843 005601 LrNIQUE NANAGE~ENT SERVICES IN 01/23/02 226.40 ~W OH
AP00178844 001226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/23/02 77~32 MW OH
AP00178845 003844 UNITED RENTALS 01/23/02 308.08 MW OH
AP00178846 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 01/23/02 10,928.46 MW OH
AP00178847 012517 V~-N WAGONER, EVE 01/23/02 27.90 MW OH
AP00178848 006759 VARGAS, ROSA 01/23/02 60.00 MW OH
AP00178849 006273 VERISIGN/NETWORK SOLUTIONS 01/23/02 245.00 MW OH
AP00178850 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 01/23/02 151.80 MW OH Payee Name different in Che~k DB
AP00178851 006616 VILLAGOMEZ, C~ARLEI 01/23/02 27.26 MW OH
AP00178852 000696 WAMSLEY, DONNA 01/23/02 20.70 MW OH
AP00178853 000213 WAXIE 01/23/02 196.43 MW OH
AP00178854 005075 WESTERN PAVING CONTRACTORS IR 01/23/02 1,000.00 MW OH AR
AP00178855 005222 WHITE CAP 01/23/02 114.10 MW OH
AP00178856 012192 WHITE, JACQULINE 01/23/02 51.00 MW OH
AP00178857 000212 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 01/23/02 21,308.50 MW OH
AP00178858 003895 WITALA, JAY 01/23/02 20.00 MW OH
AP00178859 006686 WITTING, SHELLEY 01/23/02 46.00 MW OH
AP00178860 006761 WOOLL, CONNIE 01/23/02 72.00 ~CW OH
AP00178861 004827 WORLD BOOK DI~CT ~%RKETING 01/23/02 24~40 MW OH
AP00178862 005658 X PECT FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 01/23/02 189.27 MW OH
AP00178863 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 01/23/02 3,953.80 MW OH
CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 01/23/02 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page
WED, J~/~ 23, 2002, 5:14 PM --req: CGONZALE--le~: GL JL--loc: FIN/%NCE---job: 72222 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG---
Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note
AP00178864 004405 YWCA OF THE WEST ENqD 01/23/02 622.36 ~ OH Payee Name different in Check DB
GRAND TOTALS:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 1
Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Machine Written 1569,581.33 Number of Checks Processed: 225
Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled Checks 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
G R A N D T 0 T A L 1569,581.33
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
OOMMUNITY ~Ei%VICE$
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill
DATE: February 6, 2002
SUBJECT: Approval of Co-Sponsorship of Quakes/Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Mega Mixer on February 28, 2002
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached request from the Quakes for
a co-sponsorship of a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Mega Mixer on February 28, 2002
at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Hispanic Lifestyle Magazine has invited the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes and the City
of Rancho Cucamonga to co-sponsor the 2002 Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Mega
Mixer on Thursday, February 28, 2002, from 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. at the Epicenter. It is
projected that 800-1,000 business individuals from Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and
San Bernardino counties will.attend this event.
The mixer provides the opportunity for the Quakes and the City to showcase the Fpicenter
facility, the charm of minor league baseball and may prove to provide future marketing
opportunities for both the City and Quakes.
The activity will include food and beverages in the 3rd base pavilion, information tables in
the concourse area with materials on the Quakes season and tours of the stadium.
Although not confirmed at this time, there may be a live band/disc jockey in the pavilion.
Cllt' COUNCIL
Co-SPONSORSHIP OF (~UAKES/HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MIXER
FEBRUARY 6, 2002
FISCAL IMPACT
The Quakes are requesting that the City Council waive the base rent ($120) for use of the
pavilion and the maintenance expenses ($436) associated with this event. The City would
require that the Quakes, Hispanic Lifestyle Magazine and Volume Services provide $2
million comprehensive public liability insurance and $1 million dollar Workers
Compensation insurance for the event.
K_ evir~4-dArdle'~'
Comh~unity Services Director
h~~~MMSERV[~~unci~&B~ards1~ity~~unci~~Sta~Rep~rtst2~~2~HispanicchamberMixe~2~28~~2~d~c
-2-
JAN. 21. 2002 ?:21PMQUAKES BASEBALL 909-481 5005 NO. 0129 P. 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Commun/ty Services Dept.
Panla Pachon
PO Box gO7
Rancho Cucamon~ CA 91729
Janua,,y22,2002
Dear Paula,
The publisher of Hispanic Lifestyle Magazine, Richard Sandoval, is inviting the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and Quakes Baseball to co-sponsor the 2002 Hispanic Chamber of '
Commerce Me§a Mixer on Thursday, February 28~ from 5-7 pm. at the Epicenter. He is
· xpecting up to 800 business people f~om the surrounding area.
We are pleased at this chance to embrace thc Hispanic business community and
introduce Rancho Cucamonga and Quakes Baseball to many of their members.
Showcasing our beautiful fadlity and thc charm of minur league baseball may prove to
provide future marketing opportunities for both our city and the Quakes.
Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to working together to make this
event a success for all.
R a N C H O C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
DATE: February 6, 2002
SUBJECT: Approval of Request for Waiver of Epicenter Special Event Area Fees for
the Local Chapter of the California Association of School Transportation
Official's School Bus Roadee to be held on March 15 and 16, 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached request from the
California Association of School Transportation Officials (CASTO) to conduct a School
Bus Roadeo on March 15 and 16, 2002, at the Epicenter Special Event Area.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
CASTO, Chapter 1 is a non-profit organization that has used the Rancho Cucamonga
Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot for the past four years to conduct its local Roadeo in
preparation for the State Championship Roadeo sponsored by the State Department of
Education. The statewide event normally occurs in late April, early May each year.
CASTO, Chapter 1 consists of school transportation directors, mechanics, driver
instructors and school bus drivers from the San Bernardino and Riverside Counties.
The purpose of the local Roadeo is to provide participants with an opportunity to
practice their school bus driving and maneuvering skills. There normally are between
75-80 school bus drivers who participate in the Roadeo. The course for the Roadeo is
set up during the late afternoon of March 15~. The Roadeo will be a morning to mid-
afternoon event, ending at approximately 3:00 p.m. on the afternoon of March 16, 2002.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve this request based upon the following
criteria: the historical association between this activity and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, CASTO's affiliation with the State Department of Education, its attention to
CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF EPICENTER EXPANDED PARKING LOT FEES FOR THE LOCAL
CHAPTER OF THE CASTO's SCHOOL BUS ROADEO TO BE HELD ON MARCH ] 5 AND 1 6, 2002
the public safety requirements for school bus drivers and the public service it provides
members of our community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
CASTO is requesting that the City Council waive the base rental of $3,000. In years
past there has been no maintenance costs associated with this event. It is anticipated
that there would be no maintenance expenses again this year. CASTO would be
required to provide comprehensive public liability insurance coverage in the amount of
$1 million dollars for the event.
Community Services Director
h~cOMMSERV~unci~&B~ards~cityc~unci~StaffRep~rts~2~Sch~BusR~ade~2~6~2~d~c
-2-
December 1, 2001
Ms. Paula Pachon
Rancho Cucamonga City Hall
Commtlrdty Services
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
Dear Paula,
Once aga'm, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been gracious enough to grant the use of
the Epicemer extended parking lot "G" for the anmlal CASTO, Chapter One RoMeo to
be held on March 16, 2002.
Because CASTO is a non-profit organization and this school bus romeo is to enhance the
performance of school bus drivers through competitive precision driving exercises, we
ask once aga'm, that the city wave the fees usually associated with the use of this parking
lot.
Very Cordally, f
Willa Steiner
CASTO, Chapter one
10849 Ring Ave
Alta Loma, Ca 91737
R A N C h 0 C U C A M O N G a
Co ~II~IU N I T¥ SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RENEWAL AGREEMENT With CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE
FOR SNACK BAR AND FIELD USE
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the City Council approve the Renewal Agreement with Citrus Little
League for the use of Citrus Little League Snack Bar and priority use of two (2) northerly
baseball fields at Red Hill Community Park.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In 1986, the City and Citrus Little League entered into a five (5) year renewable agreement,
which allows the league to have first priority use of two (2) baseball fields at Red Hill
Community Park during their primary season (Spring/Summer). This agreement requires the
City to grant first priority use of the two baseball fields through the City's Field Allocation
process for the Spring/Summer season. The agreement does allow other City based leagues
to share the facility during off-season play during the Fall/Winter season. The above stated
agreement and practice of priority allocation (Red Hill Park baseball fields) for Citrus Little
League during their primary season and the shared use by other leagues in the off-season
has been in practice since 1987.
In addition, the Agreement provides that Citrus Little League has the sole right to use the
snack bar throughout the entire year and is required to provide the City public liability
insurance coverage for the use of the snack bar. Citrus Little League has been using the Red
Hill Community Park baseball fields and snack bar for many years and had assisted in the
original construction of those facilities. The Agreement was renewed in 1997, and it is
recommended this agreement be renewed another five (5) years to be effective January 1,
2002 though December 31, 2007.
//
cK ~ ~i h'~ nCf;d~'~i ce s Director
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE ORGANIZATION
FOR RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK
THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into the day of ,2002, by and between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and the Citrus Little
League Organization, hereinafter referred to as "LEAGUE".
WHEREAS, the City owns and operates Red Hill Community Park for public
recreation purposes' and
WHEREAS, the LEAGUE has selflessly offered and encouraged the widest possible
community use of the results of their labors; and
WHEREAS, the CITY and LEAGUE are mutually desirous of continuing to have the
quality programs of the LEAGUE provided in the public interest at the Park,
It IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Construction activities at Red Hill Community Park included two baseball fields in the
northern half of the Park. These fields are now, as in the past, and forevermore to be
known as the "Lou Rose Memorial Fields, Home of Citrus Little League," honoring the
memory of a man dedicated to the youth of the community.
2. The City grants to the LEAGUE, in recognition of their many years of continued
contributions to the community, a "first priority use" consideration for the aforementioned
fields during tryouts, regular season and post season activities connected with Little
League Baseball. Season shall be defined as January 16 to July 31 of each year.
3. Commencing with the 2002 season, the LEAGUE may renew this agreement in five-
year increments subject to the standard energy service charge policy.
AGREEMENT - CITY/CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE
Page 2
4. The CiTY grants recognition of proprietary rights of the LEAGUE to the existing
"Citrus Little League Snack Bar." Said facility, constructed, maintained and operated solely
by the LEAGUE for the benefit of the LEAGUE, shall remain so. It shall continue to be sole
responsibility of the LEAGUE to maintain said facility in a clean and safe condition.
The CITY shall be held harmless for replacement or repair of equipment for facilities
connected with said Snack Bar made unserviceable by wear, theft, misuse or for any other
reason. The CITY shall have right of entry to said facility at its discretion for inspection
purposes and shall be provided entry keys by the LEAGUE for that purpose. Structural
modification(s) to said facility by the LEAGUE will be approved by the CITY prior to any
such modification. Such proposed modifications shall conform to all applicable local
building codes and ordinances.
5. The CITY will operate and maintain said fields and their environs, excluding the
aforementioned Snack Bar, at a level consistent with standards to provide a safe and
enjoyable experience for users. The CITY will endeavor to coordinate and conduct the
routine field maintenance program in such a manner as not to disrupt the approved
schedule of LEAGUE play. Such season schedule shall be submitted to the CITY on a
City Sports Field Usa.qe Form, and Leaque will adhere to all .quidelines and policie,~
set forth in the City Sports Field and Facilities Allocation Policy and Procedure,
Handbook. In the event that emergency maintenance and/or repairs are required to said
fields, that is, work necessary to ensure the protection of the facility and/or the safety of its
users, the CITY reserves the right to close the area to LEAGUE and other forms of
recreational play until the maintenance and/or repairs are completed.
6. This Agreement will be administered on behalf of the CITY by the Director of
Community Services, or their designee, authorized by the City Council to represent the City
in matters pertaining to this Agreement.
AGREEMENT - CITY/CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE
Page 3
7. The LEAGUE'S representative to the CITY in matters pertaining to this Agreement
shall be the LEAGUE President, or their designee.
8, LEAGUE shall hold the CITY, its City Council, agents and employees free and
harmless from liability for loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including CITY
property (including costs of suit and expenses for league services) arising out of and
attributable to LEAGUE use of the premises and occurring during the periods that the
LEAGUE has use of said premises. LEAGUE shall provide evidence of liability insurance
naming the CITY as an additional insured with a minimum coverage as established by the
City Risk Manager.
9. The LEAGUE agrees that the facilities are to be used as a strictly non-profit venture
for Citrus Little League. It is acknowledged and agreed that the LEAGUE shall not use any
part of the premises for any purpose which causes injury or damage to neighboring
property, nor for any purpose in violation of applicable policies, ordinances, or laws. In the
event that the facilities are used, or are being used in a manner which violates the
principles of the Agreement, the LEAGUE shall within thirty (30) days after receipt of written
notice from the CITY, abate the nuisance or actions in question. Failure to do so will
jeopardize their continued facility utilization as permitted under this Agreement.
10. This Ageement may be amended from time to time by the mutual written consent of
the CITY and LEAGUE.
AGREEMENT - CITY/CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE
Page 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have, on the day, month and year first
above written, caused these presents to be subscribed by their duly authorized officials as
provided below.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
William J. Alexander, Mayor
CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE ORGANIZATION
By
President
By
Secretary
Attest:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
Date
~/COMMSERV/Councils&Boards/$pottsAdvisoryComm/FidAiioc/2OO2/Agreements
R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA
ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT
Staff
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO.' Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS.
1 AND 3 FOR TRACT NO. 16239 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY
DIVERSIFIELD PACIFIC -APN: 2227-691-01
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 16239,
accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 3 and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract No. 16239, located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road,
was approved by the Planning Commission on September 26, 2001, for the development of
109 single family lots.
The Developer, Diversifield Pacific, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the
construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $1,011,800.00
Labor and Material Bond: $505,900.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JS:sc
RESOLUTION NO. 0 Z -' 0'~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT 16239
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement by Diversified Pacific as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally
located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property referred to as Tract 1639; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney.
q/
RESOLUTION NO. 02 -O.=~q ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 16239
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.3 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory")
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of
the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
/-/2
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16239
February 6, 2002
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds ofaanual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of
annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
DPDG FUND III, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The legal description of the Property is:
LOT 130 OF TRACT NO. 13753, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 218, PAGES 46 TO 51, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY;
AMENDED BY CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 1990
AS INSTRUMENT NO. 90-071566, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND AMENDED BY
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 1990 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 90-071567, OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SA1D COUNTY.
The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
A-1
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNe:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria
Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and ad such any benefit
derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that
community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels
within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees,
community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park,
Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within
this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on
an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the
facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this
area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north
of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this
district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community.
B-1
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002)
For Project: TRACT 16239
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1
SLD # 3
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L 2 ...... 40,368 213
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel DU S 1 S 3 L 2
B-2
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Single
Family Parcel 4708 1.00 4708 $422.00 $1,986,776.00
Multi-
Parcel 388 1.00 388 $422.00 $163,736.00
Family
Comm/Ind. Acre 21.59 2.00 43.18 $422.00 $18,221.96
Vacant Acre 346.63 0.25 86.66 $422.00 $36,570.52
TOTAL $2,205,304.48
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16239) is:
109 Parcels x 1.00 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $45,998.00 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
Land Use Unit Tv~e Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue
Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38
Multi-
Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51
Family
Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00
TOTAL $532,174.89
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16239) is:
109 Units x 1.00 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $1,936.93 Annual Assessment
C-1
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned
Community):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
1 ~and ! l~e Nnit Tyne I ~nitg I ~nitg Fnctnr I lnitg ! Init Revemm
Single
Family Parcel 4,071.00 1.00 4,071.00 $47.15 $191,948.00
Multi-
Unit 388.00 1.00 388.00 $47.15 $18,294.000
Family
Commercial Acre 78.79 2.00 157.58 $47.15 $7,430.00
TOTAL $217,672.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16239) is:
109 Units x 1.00 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $5,139.35 Annual Assessment
C-2
RAN C H O C U C A M O N G A
F. NGI~E EI~ING D~PA12T~I~NT
Staff Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~J
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician~
~UBJECT: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF
THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,251.30 ($45,683.00 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 8TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS,
ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1297176-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $50,251.30 ($45,683.00 plus 10% contingency) to the
apparent Iow bidder, All American Asphalt, for the construction of the 8t~ Street Pavement
Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account
No. 11763035650/1297176-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 8, 2002, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $51,568.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be
inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to
meet the requirements of the bid documents.
R e~,,y! submitted,
WJO:JAD/RO:Is
Attachment
24TH 5T
NTS
(~TH
PROJECT
LOCATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
{]TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
FROM GROVE AVENUE TO t]AKER AVENUE
VICINITY MAP
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 8, 2002 ,4PP.4RENTLOWBIDDER
8TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ENGINEERS COST
GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER AVENUE ESTIMATE Ail American Asphalt Popular Paver Rental R.J. Noble Company
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
NG QTY UNIT i DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1 1 LS Mobilization $6,000.00 $6~000.0(3 $4~600.00 $4~600.0(~ $2~240.00 $2,240.00 $1~350.00 $1~350.00
2. 3720 SY Variable Cold Plane 0.09' to 0.12' or 0.15' $1.90 $7,068.00 $1.05 $3~906.0(] $1.40 $5~208.00 $1.55 $5~766.00
3. 360 TON Corot. 0.12'AHRM incl. cracksesllng & RockDus~ $80.00 $28~800.00 $87.00 $31~320.00 $87.63 $31~546.80 $91.00 $32?760.00
4. 9 EA Replace Ind-etive Loops $300.00 $2?700.00 $288.00 $2~592.0(3 $325.00 $2~925.00 $300.0(3 $2~700.00
5. 1 LS Traffic Co,Uol $4~000.00 $4~000.00 $1~065.00 $1,065.0(3 $2?000.00 $2,000.00 $3~100.00 $3~100.00
6. LS Traffic SUiping and Marlrin~ $3~000.00 $3~000.00 $2~200.00 $2~200.00 $3~000.00 $3,000.00 $2~300.00 $2,300.00
TOTAL $51,568.00 $45,683.00 $46,919.80 $47~976.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY Bt 2002
8TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM Laird Construction Co., Holland-Lowe
GROVE AVENUE TO BAKEl~ AVENUE Vance Corporation Silvia Constructinn~ Inc. Inc. Construction, Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
l~lO OTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1 LS Mobilization $11~869.0~ $11,869.00 $7~000.0(3 $7,000.00 $14,625.00 $14,625.00 $9,853.00 $9,853.00
2. 3720 SY Variable Cold Plane O.Og' to O. ITorO.l$' $1.05 $3,906.00 $1.15 $4,278.00 $1.50 $~,580.00 $1.87 $6,956.40
3. 360 TON Coast. 0.1T AHRM incl. ers~lt sealing & Rock Dus! $7~.00 $27~000.00 $95.0(3 $34,200.00 $65.00 $23~400.0C $70.00 $25,200.00
4. 9 EA Replace Inductive Loops $205.00 $1~845.00 $205.00 $1~$45.00 $215.00 $17935.0C $200.00 $1~800.00
5. 1 LS Traffic Co~t, ul $3,000~00 $3~000.00 $850.00 $850.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.0~ $5~860.00 $5,860.00
6. I LS Traffic Striping and Marldng $2,250.00 $2~250.00 $2,264.00 $2~264.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.0~ $2~200.00 $2~200.00
TOTAL $49~870.00 $50,437.00 $50~540.0(3 $51~869.40
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 8, 2002
8TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER AVENUE Hardy & Harper, Inc. Premier Contractors
UNIT UNIT
~'0 QTY Dl,,ll-{D~CRi~iOI~I COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. LS Mobilization $1,000.00 $1,000.0(3 $2,000.00 $2,000.0(
2. 3720 SY Nariable Cold Plane 0.09' to 0.12' or 0.15' $1.50 $5,~80.00 $4.00 · $14,880.0¢
3. 360 TON Coast. 0.12' AHRM incL crack sealing & Rock Dus~ $140.00 $50,400.00 $100.00 $36,000.0~
4. 9 EA Replace Inductive Loops $275.00 $2,475.00 $500.00 $4,500.0~
5. I LS Traffic ConSol $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.0C
6. 1 LS Traffic Shiplu~ and Marking $2,415.00, $2,415.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0C
TOTAL $64,370.00 $65.380.00
~ Page 1
~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
EI~GIN E EI~ING
Staff Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ,,~ j
BY: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technici~.~.2
SUBJEC3': ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF
THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,585.60 ($86,896.00 PLUS 10%
CONTINGENCY) TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SILVIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM
LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS,
ACCOUNT 11763035650/1199176-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, except that submitted by R.J.
Noble Company as non-responsive to the needs of the City, and award and authorize the execution
of the contract in the amount of $95,585.60 ($86,896.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow
bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc., for the construction of the Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation
from Lion Street to Hellman Avenue, to be funded from Measure I funds, Account No.
11763035650/1199176-0.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 22, 2002, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $126,365.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received
and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements, except that submitted
by R.J. Noble Company. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all
responsive bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Re~pe~:ffully submitt&d,
City Engineer
WJO:LH/RO:Is
Attachment
VICINITY MAP
~.r, oject
\ ~ I~TH ST / I__.,j~l__//----'q~~ ~ ~
' z ~ ~ ~CTORI
~ ~ ~ ~ ~TH ST j~ .
CI~ O~ ~C~O CUC~ON~A
BAS~ ~N~ RO~
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 22, 2002 APPARENTLOWBIDDER
Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Lion Street to ENGINEERS COST
Hellman Avenue ESTIMATE Silvia Construction, Inc. ' ILJ. Noble Company All American Asphalt
UNITI UNIT UNITI UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1130 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM), including
pavement nrenaration and crack fill $75.00 $84,750.00 $57.00 $64,410.0~ $58.00 $65,540.0~ $62.00 $70,060.00
2. 2163 SY Cold Plane (Variable 0.15'-0') $5.00 $10,815.00 $2.65 $5,731.95 $5.00 $10,815.00 $3.00 $6,489.00
3. 4 EA ~.djust to Grade (Manhole) $350.00 $1,400.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 $600.00 $2,400.00 $300.00 $1,200.00
4. 7 EA Adjust to Grade (Water Valve, Clean out and
Water Meter) $200.00 $1,400.00 $60.00 $420.00 $60.00 $420.00 $200.00 $1,400.00
5 3 EA Adjust Survey Monumants $500.00 $1,500.00 $428.00 $1,284.00 $60.00 $180.00 $200.00 $600.00
6. 1 LS Striping and Pavement Markings $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,530.00 $3,530.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $4,379.00 $4,379.00
7. 10 EA Install inductive Loops $350.00 $3,500.00 $268.00 $2,680.00 $350.00 $3,500.00 $250.00 $2,500.00
8. 1 LS Traffic Contxol $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $7,240.05 $7,240.05 $2,260.00 $2,260.00
TOTAL $126~365.00 $86~896.00 $88?655.00 $88~888.00
BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 22, 2002
Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Lion Street to Gilbert Ayala & Sons, Laird Construction Co., ~
Heliman Avenue RVC Roadway Inc. Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT
NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT
1. 1130 TONS Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM), including
~avement ~renaration and crack fill $62.55 $70,681.50 $74.51 $84,196.30 $67.50 $76,275.00
2. 2163 SY Cold Plane (Variable 0.15'-0') $2.05 $4,434.15 $1.65 $3,568.95 $3.50 $7,570.50
3. 4 EA Adjust to Grade (Manhole) $470.00 $1,880.00 $346.00 $1,384.00 $600.00 $2,400.00
4. 7 EA Adjust to Grade (Water Valve, Clean out and
Water Meter) $35.00 $245.00 $30.00 $210.00 $50.00 $350.00
5. 3 EA Adjust Survey Monuments $800.00 $2,400.00 $465.00 $1,395.00 $750.00 $2,250.00
6. LS Striping and Pavement Markings $4,945.00 $4,945.00 $9,370.00 $9,370.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
7.. 10 EA InstalI inductive Loops $195.50 $1,955.00 $196.00 $1,960.00 $275.00 $2,750.00
8. 1 LS Traffic Control $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,730.00 $5,730.00 $13,250.00 $13,250.00
~/~ TOTAL $89,540.65 $107,814.25 $109,845.5C
~ Page ~
R A N HO C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FRO~: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-19, SUBMITTED BY AMERICAN STORES
PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for CUP 97-19 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and
accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 97-19, located on the northwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing
Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: American Stores Properties, Incorporated
Release: Faithful Performance Bond 400JX9754 $ 685,280.00
400JX9755 $1,020,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond 6142067 $ 68,528.00
6142067 $ 102,000.00
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
,5'5
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO RD
BLVD
~ic]~qq~rrY* MAP
N.T.$.
CUP~97~.19
RESOLUTION NO. 02" OL~~)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-19 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 97-19, have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
EiNGI NEER~NG DEPARTFIENT
Staff Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BONDS, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR TRACT 15871-2, SUBMI'I-FED BY WILLIAM LYON
HOMES, INC., LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY
CREEK BOULEVARD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 15871-2 have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the
Faithful Performance Bonds and accept Maintenance Bonds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15871-2, located on the northwest comer
of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane, the applicant was required to complete
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the
City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and accept Maintenance
Bonds.
Developer: William Lyon Homes, Inc.
4490 Von Karman Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92660-2008
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 15871-2
February 6, 2002
Page 2
Release: Faithful Performance Bonds 3SM 958 440 00 342,500.00
3SM 958 441 00 365,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Bonds 3SM 958 440 00-A 34,250.00
3SM 958 441 00-A 36,500.00
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15871-2 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15871-2,
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Sti f Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer /~;~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techr~ian
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE ACCESS RAMP IMPROVEMENTS GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG
HERMOSA AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 01-078 AS COMPLETE,
RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR
AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $68,211.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Access Ramp Improvements Generally Located Along
Hermosa Avenue and Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 01-078, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the
release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $65,259.00 six months after the recordation of said
notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $6,821.10,
35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $68,211.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $68,211.00,
which included one contract change order resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 4.52%. The
original amount approved by Council was $71,784.90 ($65,259.00 plus 10%).
~V~i?~ j. O~,Ntfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD/RO:I$
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
ADA 2000/2001 ACCESS RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ALONG HERMOSA AVE. AND LEMON AVE.
PROJECT
LOCATION
Aim ond Rd
Banyan Route 30
under construction)
hland Av
Base
Foothil
10 Freeway__
~-..~
4th St
>
EXHIBIT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. C)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
ACCESS RAMP IMPROVEMENTS GENERALLY LOCATED
ALONG HERMOSA AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT
NO. 01-078 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Access Ramp Improvements Generally Located Along
Hermosa Avenue and Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 01-078, has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
]~ NGIN E EI~ I N G D E PAI~ THE N T
StaffR ort
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR DR 97-33,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SIXTH STREET AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY DOVE INVESTMENTS,
INCORPORATED
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance
Guarantee Bond, for DR 97-33, located on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and
Rochester Avenue, submitted by Dove Investments, Incorporated.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain
free from defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer: Dove Investments, Incorporated
c/o Panattoni
19700 Fairchild Road
Irvine, CA 92613
Respectfully submitted,
Willia~m/m J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:rs
Attachments
/
SIT£
7~1 ST.
VICINITY MAP
· CITY OF i:L4aNC]RO CUCAiVIONGA
ENG~G DIVISION
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENG1N[~DING DI~PAI~T~I~NT
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: James T. Harris, Associate Engineerr--~,.~
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni~3h~
SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT ROCHESTER AVENUE AND LARK DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 01-025
AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND
APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $83,740.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Rochester
Avenue and Lark Drive, Contract No. 01-025, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond,
authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $83,740.00 six months after
the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the
retention in the amount of $8,374.00, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract
amount of $83,740.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $83,740.00, which included no contract change orders. The original amount
approved by Council was $92,114.00 ($83,740.00 plus 10%).
Respectfully submitted,
Will~m J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JTH/RO:Is
C_.,IT'Y OF F~NONO
Tt~AFFIC. ,~IC~NAL Pt~OJEC, T
V'IOINIT"r M,~,P
_IL
F'O
NT~
F~ ~och~k~r, Av~. ~ Lork Pr.
RESOLUTION NO. 0 2- OL~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGHTING AT ROCHESTER AVENUE AND LARK DRIVE,
CONTRACT NO. 01-025 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at
Rochester Avenue and Lark Ddve, Contract No. 01-025, has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
~A~¢HO ~UCA~O~GA
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Members oflhe City C,O~ndl
Jack Lam, AJCP, City Manager
FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
DATE: February 6, 2002
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-03- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-
A request to change the Victoria Community Plan land use designation from Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial for .24 acre
adjacent to the ease side of Lot 73 of Tract 15875 near the northeast corner of
Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue. The City will also consider
community plan text changes to better define the scope of Village Commercial
development in the immediate area. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-
02A, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-02, and General Plan Amendment
002-02C. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for
consideration
Due to an error made by the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, the attached Ordinance No. 662 did
not get published in the newspaper as directed by the City Clerk's office in order to comply with
legal requirements.
In order to correct this error, the City Attorney's office suggests the Council approve second
reading once again so that the Ordinance can be published in the newspaper within 15 days of
its adoption.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
~, CMC
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 662
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-03, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
VILLAGE COMMERCIAL FOR .24-ACRE OF LAND LOCATED
NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND MAKING TEXT AMENDMENTS
TO THE DESCRIPTION OF THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL
DESIGNATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF.
A. RECITALS.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Community Plan
Amendment 00-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Ordinance, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as
"the application."
2. On September 27, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on associated General Plan
Land Use Applications, and issued Resolution No.s 00-104 and 00-106
recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan
Amendments 00-02A and 00-02C be approved.
3. On September 27, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
issued Resolution No. 00-107, recommending to the City Council that Victoria
Community Plan Amendment 00-03 be approved.
4. On November 1,2000, and continued to December 20, 2000, the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
associated General Plan Land Use Application and on Victoria Specific Plan
Amendment 00-03, and continued said public hearing to an unspecified date.
5. On Juty 18, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Land Use
Application and issued Resolution No. 01-175, approving the associated General
Plan Amendment 00-02C.
6. On July 18, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga continued
its review of the application by conducting a duly re-noticed public hearing.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
Ordinance No. 662
Page 2 of 5
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on November 1,2000, December 20, 2000, and July
18, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,
this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately .24-acre of land, basically a
triangular configuration, located on the northeast corner of Highland Avenue
and Day Creek Boulevard, and is presently vacant. Said properb/is currently
designated as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) within the
Victoria Community Plan; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is being developed with a new
State freeway. The property to the east is designated Low Residential and is
developed with a single-family residential neighborhood. The property to the
west is designated Village Commercial and is vacant. The property to the
south is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is
developed with a single family residential neighborhood; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan, and will provide for development within the district in a manner
consistent with the General Plan and related development through the land
use review process of this application; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use
Element by providing additional Convenience Commercial opportunities for
the nearby residents, and by deleting the potential of residential development
from an area of increasing vehicle traffic and noise; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the
adjacent properties, and would not have a significant impact on the
environment nor the surrounding properties as evidence by the findings of
the environmental assessment.
$. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
district when combined with the parcel immediately adjacent to the site, in
terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the
surrounding area by the combined site exceeding the minimum lot width of
150 feet for commercial sites of the Victoria Community Plan, and by its
location, is adjacent to existing Village Commercial designated land; and
b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced bythe conclusions
listed in the Initial Study Parts I and II; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by
providing a land use pattern that is complementary with nearby existing
Village Commercial parcels.
Ordinance No. 662
Page 3 of 5
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is
no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the
environment, and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as
follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State
CEQA guidelines promulgated there under; that said Negative Declaration
and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of
the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the
information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations, which have been incorporated
into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will
occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the
record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project,
there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an
adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the
Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information
provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council
hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section
753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4
above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-03
to change the land use designation to Village Commercial as shown in Exhibit
"A" to this Ordinance.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Please See the Following Page for Certification, Formal Adoption, and Signatures
Ordinance No. 662
Page 4 of 5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of February 2002.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN ED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Al-rEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of July 2001, and was passed at a Regular
Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 6th day of February 2002.
Executed this 7th day of February 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
m
~ VCPA 00-02 & -03 Zoning Designations Map
Route 30 Fwy.
~~_~~ hland Ave.
~ ,~:~:~oo oo,..~.
~ J~gg~gg*~ :~o< :~ ~ LOW MEDIUM
no scalo
ORDINANCE NO. /-~75
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT, DRCDCA01-02, A REQUEST TO AMEND VARIOUS
SECTIONS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICTS BY ADDING OR MODIFYING TEXT AND GRAPHICS
REGARDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment
DRCDCA01-02, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng
on that date.
3. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public headng on January 16, 2002, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within the City.
b. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment.
c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street
furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape,
promote cohesiveness and preserve Histodc Route 66.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRCDCA01-02- ClTY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 16,2002
Page 2
a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development; and
b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives the Development Code;
and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRCDCA01-O2by the adoption of the
attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 050
A clear organization of streets, identifiable districts, and landmarks which gives people
a sense of direction and orientation. The extent of confusion in traffic circulation, and the
amount of congestion increasingly figures in people's perceptions of cities.
3. A sense of uniqueness. This quality can be derived from a single feature, a district-wide
theme reflecting ethnic or historical themes, or an event which is staged in a special place
each year.
4. A sense of place in a shared past which gives people a sense of belonging.
B. Community Desiqn Vocabulary. In an effort to provide a unique community image for the
Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing or proposed image enhancement elements will
be provided or enhanced and designed to increase corridor identity. Vocabulary of these imago
giving elements include the following:
1. Activity Centers. Activity Centers are points of intersection at major streets or landmarks
along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. As such, they are points of concentrated activity
which give identity to individual subareas. Major Activity Centers located contiguous to
the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include the areas surrounding the following intersections:
a. Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road
b. Foothill Boulevard at Vineyard Avenue
c. Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue
d. Foothill Boulevard at Hermosa Avenue
· e. Foothill Boulevard at ' . even Avenue
f. Foothill Boulevard at Milliken Avenue
g. Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue
h. Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard
i. Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue
r~4~tt~- fO~' C~'O~-!~ ? rnor~ inf~r~fln~, 'Fo~'n~=~!, ~nr~ dltttar=ca im,nr~,,~inn nf fh~ Fnnfhill
Beule,.~,~.C4~-~ido~ The Activity Center at Foothill Boulevard and San Bemardino Road
is a more rural, informal, village design concept. The specific design of the "1
intersections for the Activity Centers between Vineyard and Etiwanda Avenues is
within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan.
2. Suburban Parkway Transitions. It is recognized that the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will
not become a totally pedestrian-oriented environment. Therefore, the five
pedestrian-oriented activity centers listed above, will be linked together by "suburban
parkway" transition areas. These parkway transition sections will consist of informal
landscape treatments dominated by drifts of London Planes, California Sycamore, and
Purple Plum trees. Other parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms and
meandering/undulating sidewalks which are designed to complement informal landscape
treatments. The parkway transitions will include enhancement areas that have
DRCDCA 01 '02 17.32-18 2/01
EXHIBIT "Al"
· '77
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050
special treatments with accent pavement in the travel lanes, median island, and~
sidewalks~ street furniture, and accent trees. The specific design of the parkway
transitions and enhancement areas is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual
Improvement Plan. '-'
3. Landmarks Specific elements of the environment that exhibit and promote an individual
or unique identity include landmarks. Because landmarks are, by definition, unique and
distinct, they are also few in number. Landmarks are typically associated with historic
structures/features or prominent land forms which exhibit memorable qualities and project
a strong identity or image. Landmarks located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard
Corridor include:
a. The Sycamore Inn
b. The Oso Bear Monument
c. The remnants of the Cucamonga China Town
d. The Thomas Brothers Winery
e. The Virginia Dare Winery
f. The first U.S. Post Office site in Cucamonga
g. John and George Klusman Houses
h. Mitchell House
i. Mandala House
j. Bell House
k. Guiders House
I. Sacred Heart Church
m. Aggazzotti Winery
n. Sections of San Bernardino Road located east of the Southern Pacific Railroad
bridge and north of Foothill Boulevard
17.32-19 2/01
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A2"
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050
4. Gateways. Gateway elements are typically associated with prominent landforms,
landscape features, structures, or entrance monumentation signs designed to announce
entrance into a community or special districts. Currently, these gateway features are
nonexistent within the planning area, which contribute to an overall lack of corridor
definition or identity. Gateways are proposed for the intersections of Foothill
Boulevard/Grove Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue. The specific design of~'
the two gateways is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual ImprovementJ ' ~'-~
Plan.
5. Views. View opportunities ars found within every subarea and range from expansive
vistas of distant mountains, to tightly framed views of landmarks, prominent natural
landforms, or other special features located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard. The critical
ENTRYPORTAL i
INCLUDE SPECIAL HARDSCAPE
AND' LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT~-~~'~,,.~
· 1" PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS
WELL AS PRIVATE PROPERTY AS
LVisualDEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENTImprovement Plan
r Foothill Boulevard/Route 66
I ' '-,
requirement is that view opportunities be recognized and enhanced and that all proposed
developments be designed to preserve and protect the desired view.
C. Key £xisfin.q Communiht Features. In an effort to promote community design within the Foothill
Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing community design features have been identified. It is
the intent of the community design plan to identify these elements so that they may he
preserved or enhanced, lbo followin9 key community features are significant structurss and
are worthy of prsservation/restoration and should be incorporated into any [uture development
proposals for their respective sites. Key community design features related to the Foothill
Boulevard are described below.
1. Themes Brothers and Vir.qinia Dars Wineries. lhese wineries are one of the major
theme-settin9 cammunity character elements for the Foothill Boulevard Corddor. All
strsetscapetlandscape and architectural components shall be sensitive to and compatible
with the overall winery theme of Rancho Cucamonga. Key visual elements, such as
grape arbors and trellis elements, shall be consistently repeated along the corridor.
Architectural variations which fully reflect the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga shall be
encouraged.
The Thomas Brothers Winery, first established in 1839, is among the oldest in the state.
The building reflects early California/Spanish architectural influences, characterized by
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A3' 17.32-20 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 050
i' ~' '-~" ~'-~:: ~a - ' -.
~ ...... ~~0~!1.
~[ Th~ ~p**ifi~ de~i~n [or thi~ inter, e~tion i* wRhin th~ Foothill Boul~vard/Rout~ ~8
~ Visual Improwm~nt Plan.
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - ARCHIBALD AVENUE INTERSECTION
3. Sycamore Inn. The Sycamore Inn Activity Center is dominated by a quality sit-down
restaurant and complemented by a small specialty-oriented restaurant and the original
Red Chief Motel. Originally established in the 1880s this large, two-story structure was
constructed as an inn/stage stop in the community known as Bear Gulch. The
architecture is characterized by chateau and craftsman details. The building is sheathed
in vertical wood siding and has a moderately pitched gable roof with a native stone
chimney. The building and site are enhanced by the presence of numerous mature
California Sycamore trees.
4. Maqic Lamp Restaurant. The Magic Lamp Restaurant is located in an eclectic building
which is characterized by brick walls and a unique clay-tiled hip roof. The roof of the
structure is composed of a variety of roof tiles stacked in such a fashion as to provide a
rich, textured effect. The restaurant lies within the Bear Gulch Activity Area.
5. Eucalyptus Windrows. The remnants of a windrow are found on either side of Foothill
Boulevard, east of the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge crossing which traverses Foothill
Boulevard. The trees are mature and appear healthy; although they are not maintained
and set a distinctive open space character along Foothill Boulevard.
6. Notable Structures. The following community features are notable structures and, at the
property owners option, can be incorporated into a future development proposal. Any
such proposal must be required to upgrade these structures to current City Development
Standards (i.e., building and safety, land use circulation/access, and landscaping) or may
be relocated off-site,
a. Old Route 66 Gas Station (9670). This former gas station, located near the
intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, is comprised of two
separate buildings which include an office, gas pump canopy, and a separate
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A4" 17.32-22 . . 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050
A. URBAN FORM
Single story slxuctum at sidewald edge with two, peasildy 3
story structures behind. At major intereac~ons, busings
should be sidewalk adjacent, with awnings of stnx~
overhangs for solar relief for pedestrians. Bu~idinge not
v,~dn intersec~ons zones.
B. HISTORICAL/ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING pO'i'~NT1AL
based upon histedc nature of Foothill B ~1~.. Winery at
Vineyard may add some'mnsh elements to archite~um
such as grape arbem or front ~. Older gas
along FooCqig buld during the '4O's & 5O's also contain
special archltoctura; elements and metofial contexL
C. DESIGN THEME pOI~NTIAL
A specJflc deaign theme ls coeaidered s weak idea and a
conjured tbeme ls atse a po~. idea. An overan seale, fom~,
and materials palette is considered most appropdete.
I.
Foothilll Sh~d. ls r~ s I~l~"~aton ~m~eaureal i~ lsa vehksl~'
con'iddr. The u~oan design s~mativea shouid consider crea~n~
pedeaf~an nodes at designated Io~. parldng should be hidden
at these designated int~. Consider a con~dor-k~ b~keway.
E. cAPn'AL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS
Capital improvements would Include re. dior emphasis at
designated inter~. Elealeats nught include trafftc.~nttof
urban element Ctountatn, sctdotum~, or aisles of flage/bannora).
~v/,% Per Foothgl Boulevard~Route 66 1
Visual Improvement Plan
F. STHEE SC OE
Street furnituro and o~her 81ement~
Foothill Boulevard/Route SS
Visual ImproYement Plan.
O. LAND USE COMPATIBlUTY
Congrngate bedentrbm orle~tdd uea~ at major
Iocatims.
H. MATERIALS AND COLORS
Heavy emphasis on texaaed mato~ with mix of warm
and cool colo~. Avoidance of large expanses of gless or
other reflec~ve materials. Use of whito also. Fo~ major
wall color, smooth finish stucco, sleJead woeds and metal
I. VACANT LAND
Vacant areas at designated interaec~ should
incofpomto selected urban design concept into projecL
Meandering sidewalks should connect with access areas
ACTIVITY CENTER CONCEPT
-r
specific design for each Activity Center per Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Improvement Plan~J
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT 'A5" 17.32-26 2/01
Rancho Cucamon~,a Development Code Section 17.32.050
Formal Street
Tree Planting
Street Access to
Two Story Building
Plaza
Paving
Fountain Element
Enriched Cross"
Walk. Paving
Colonnade Entry
. Formal
, Foundation
Planting
ACTIVITY CENTER/iNTERSECTION CONCEPT
Specific design for each Activity Center per Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan.~.''[
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A6" 17.32-27 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 050
i Decorative light fixtures.
Focal theme clock
\
Tower/clock, to be
Located out of the
:Trash receptacles, right-of-way.
', Accent potted plant
I Material 36"x 30'
Planter size 5'x5' --
~-.
Decorative tree grata~ -
--~e.~*a~*a*~ ·
Urban tree bosk. 30' box ~
. Min. 12'O'min. Verlical Deceraf~
Clearance to be maintained. ~
4. Suburban Parkways. Suburban parkways will be designed to link individual
activity centers, lhe parkways will be designed with informal clusters of
trees and rolling turf borms, which evoke pastoral, suburban-oriented,
qualities.
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "AT'
17.32-28 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050
5. Parkway Transitions. In order to provide a gradual transition from urban-oriented
parkways, "parkway transitions" have been introduced within the plan. Parkway
transitions are designed to transition formal hardscape elements found within the urban
activity zone into informal landscape statements which incorporate rolling turf berms,
meandering/undulating sidewalks; and informal tree plantings. Specifically, the parkway
transition is characterized by a 75-foot transition zone, dominated by Flowering Plum_ '
accent trees. See sketch below for concept. See Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual[ ~
Improvement Plan for Specifications. _J. ''-
PARKWAY TRANSITION
6. Circulation System Concepts.
a. Center Median Islands. In order to preserve the level of service on Foothill
Boulevard, access to commercial properties should be via the median breaks at
signalized intersections, with off-street, internal circulation to be provided to serve
the properties between intersections. It will also be necessary to accept an
increased number of U-tums at the remaining intersections to reduce the greater
friction caused by more frequent median openings.
Any median break on a street with such high volume must be signalized for safety;
and when signals are placed less than approximately 700 feet apart, the speed at
which progressive traffic movement can be obtained falls below an acceptable
level. East-west arterials in the City will have to be capable of two-way, progressive
traffic service for a large part of the day.
For these reasons, no median break has been planned, for example, at Red Hill
Country Club Drive, San Diego Avenue, or Klusman Avenue. Klusman Avenue is
DRCDCA 01-02 17.32-28 2/01
EXHIBIT 'A8"
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050
h. The Pedestrian Experience. Architecture and outdoor space along Foothill
Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian
experience. The experience should be visually diverse, stimulating, and include
activities that create a sense of variety and excitement.
(1) Site buildings to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand
the' existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This is
accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on Foothill
Boulevard.
(2) Site and design buildings to minimize pedestrianNehicle conflicts and avoid
locating driveways and service areas which interfere with the flow of Foothill
Boulevard pedestrian movements.
(3) Site and design structures to facilitate public access across sites where
important pedestrian connections occur. Mid-block passageways from rear
parking lots can be created through a fully developed internal pasco system.
11. Streetscape Desiqn Details,
a, Streetscape Furniture. This streetscape furniture/material palette depicts the
elements to utilize along Foothill Boulevard. All furniture that is connected to the
sidewalk shall be connected with shear bolts and not have concrete or other
footings..This matrix applies to all of Foothill Boulevard. ~
~ The specific furniture selections are within the Foothill Boulevard IRoute ] )[/~/)l")l~-~/
. 66 Visual Improvement Plan. ~cr f~t"rc d!rcc!!c~ ch!)'. !t !".. ~ct !n!~-nd-~d !c b-~ a
1."r II 1t' :'
.Media~ Parking Lot Urban Node Bench Parking ' Bench
Lighting Lighting Lighting Lighting · '
Drinking Trash Bollard Tree Grate Bollard Trash
Fountain Recepfical Receptical
/,consistent
rarchitacture
/ palette
Planter Enriched Paving Broom Finish Primary Entry Sign Planter
Concrete
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A9" 17.32-48 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.050-17.32.070
STREETSCAPE FURNiTURE/MATERIAL PALETTE
b. Streetscape Liqhting. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent,
planned look for Foothill Boulevard during daylight hours and evenings. Lighting
can have a dramatic affect on the quality of streetscape design.
All lighting fixtures, luminaries, poles, and supporting hardware in the publi.'~
right-of-way shall be consistent and approved by the City Engineer per the Foothill
Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. ,,~...:-., tn .... ,. ....
of ~'~ '-"---:-- "' ....................... '" be.vv,..: .... .~ · --'~ :- ' .... :"'"
All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure
sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building
site.
c. Streetscape Color Coordination. In order to aid in design continuity along the
Foothill Boulevard Corridor significant portions of all street furniture shall be
finished with a unifying color per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual
Improvement Plan. A co!ct -"h-~!! b_'c -_c!ectcd '::h!ch ':.'!!! e×h!b!! the
Section 17.32.060 - Trip Reduction
A. A minimum of one shower facility, accessible to both men and women, shall be provided for
persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds:
Commercial 250,000 square feet
Industrial 325,000 square feet
Office 125,000 square feet
Hotels and Motels 250 rooms
Section 17~32.070- Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines
The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Interstate 15 was not part of the original
Foothill Boulevard Study area; therefore the provisions of the original Specific Plan did not apply to
development within this "Missing Link.' Subsequently, these Guidelines were prepared in order to
provide specific streetscape design provisions through those portions of the Terra Vista and Victoria
Planned Communities and the Industrial Districts. The Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines,
therefore, extend the concepts of the original Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan through the "Missing
Link," thereby creating a dynamic concourse with a unifying community design image reflective of the
community heritage and identity.
A. Activin Centers: Activity Centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard
Corridor defined as "Theme" or "Statement" areas which "tie" together the visual aspects of the
Foothill Boulevard Corridor through the city, promote concentrated activity at these areas, and
give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located. The Activity Centers are located
contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in the following drawing:
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "Al0" 17.32-49 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32. 050 -17.32. 070
ACTIVITY CENTERS
Because three comers of the Haven Avenue intersection are fully or partially developed, the
development provisions of the Activity Center am limited to those streetscape and landscape
improvements within the public right-of-way. Therefore, many of the following standards apply
only to the Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue Activity Centers:
1. Streetscape
a. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The building
setback areas will be enhanced pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials,
formal landscape arrangements, and pedestrian-level lighting.
b. Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks with special paving materials,
light standards, and street furniture should be uniform throughout the Foothill.
Boulevard Corridor per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement..
Plan. * - '
c. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a formal, regularly spaced,
street tree planting system utilizin§ a palette of informally shaped, colorful trees.
· d. The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should
· extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondary/intersecting streets to a point of
logical transition to the suburban parkway. Typically, the design will extend to at
least the first driveway or as modified through the design review process. The
: extent of the urban streetscape should be able to adjust to changes in public right-
of-way condit!ons such as right turn lanes and bus baYs.
2. - Site Plannin.q
a. At activity centers, buildings may be placed at Or adjacent to the front setback line
to create a more appealing, active streetscape. Front yard areas of parking lots
dominating the streetscene are specifically prohibited.
b. Multi-sto~ I~uildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level. All ground
story facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale. This can be
accomplished through the breaking of facades into bays and the signage brought
down in size and location. Further, this reduction in scale can be established
through the use of elements which add horizontal articulation to the facades.
DRCDCA 01-02 17.32-50 2/01
EXHIBIT "Al 1"
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32. 050 -17.32. 070
B. Suburban Parkways:
1. Streetscape.
a. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees, rolling turf ben'ns,
and meandering/undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral, suburban qualities.
b. Streetscape elements such as boilards, crosswalks with special paving, light
standards, and street furniture shall be identical in style and finish to those used in
the Foothill Boulevard corridor per the Foothill. Boulevard/Route 66 VisualI ,~"~
Improvement Plan.
2. Architectural Concept:
a. The architectural characteristics shall be governed by the existing standards of the
Development Code, Terra Vista Community Plan, and Victoria Community Plan.
b. In situations where buildings are highly visible from the side streets and/or adjacent
parking areas, special emphasis shall be placed on creating architectural interest.
3. Landscape Concept: The plantings will consist of informal treatments, dominated by
Lon'don Plane (Platanus acerifolia), California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), and
Flowering Plum (Prunus cerasifera) trees. Other species may be used to accent and/or
supplement these designated tree types. The type and location of these species should
be reviewed in conjunction with specific development proposals.
C. Parkway Transitions: In order to provide a gradual transition from the urban activity centers to
the suburban, informal parkways, "parkway transitions" will be introduced along the corridor.
Parkway transitions are designed to blend the formal hardscape and tree planting pattern of the
activitycenters with the informal landscape and hardscape treatmentofthe suburban parkways.
Specifically, the parkway transition is characterized by a 75- to 150-foot zone, dominated by
Flowering Plum trees. Other tree species may be introduced to supplement the Flowering Plum
to assist in creating a smooth transition. Please refer to the illustration shown in Section
17.32.050.D.5.
D. General Guidelines:
1. Site PlanninR:
a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and
expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be
accomplished by creating Plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on the boulevard.
b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts.
Driveways and service areas shall be located to avoid interfering with the flow of
pedestrian circulation in and around the site.
c. All auto related facilities (i.e. working bays, storage, etc.) shall be oriented/screened
away from public view.
d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited retail uses
(as permitted by the applicable Community Plan or Chapter 17.30), and other high
intensity pedestrian u~ses on the ground levels of all buildings within activity centers.
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT 'A12" 17.32-52 2/01
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32. 050 -17.32. 070
2. Parkinq Lots:
a. Whenever possible, entries shall be located on side streets in order to minimize
pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible, the Foothill Boulevard site
entry shall be designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers (behind the
public right-of-way) to differentiate it from the sidewalks.
b. Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, shall
be located as far from street intersections as possible.
c. Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving
vehicles and minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles.
d. Individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are
clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. New development projects
shall delineate on all plans where vehicular connections to adjacent properties are
located. The applicant must also demonstrate provisions for access easements for
such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved master
plans.
e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the street
sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement. This can be
accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving,
trellis struc!uros, and/or landscape treatments..
3. Landscape DesiRn:
a. All street furniture, light standards, bollards, and similar hardware within 10 feet of
the.public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Boulevard
Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may vary and match related architecture.
b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at the base of buildings. Asphalt
edges at the base of structures are prohibited. Plant materials in containers are
appropriate.
c. Internal pedestrian circulation, linking office complexes with neighboring
commercial or office developments, Should be located close to buildings.
d. Planting clusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement~ The diversity of
massing types should be groat enough to provide interest but kept to a level which
evokes a relaxed, natural feeling to the observer.
e. Water conserving plantings and irrigation should be used in all landscaped areas.
(Refer to.City Ordinance No. 411 -Xeriscape.)
4. Streetscape Liqhting:
a. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill
Boulevard during day and evening hours. Lighting can have a dramatic effect on
the quality of the streetscape design.
b. All lighting 'fixtures, luminaries, poles and supporting hardware in the public"r
right-of-way shall be consistent along Foothill Boulevard and approved by the CityI
Engineer, per the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Planl"tVv'/'/
EXHIBIT "A13" 17.32-53 2/01
Rancho. Cucamon g a Development Code Sections 1 Z 32. 050 -17. 32. 070
c. All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure
sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building
site.
E. Foothill Boulevard Circulation Improvements
1. Center Median Proqram - Based upon traffic analyses, a continuous 14-foot wide raised
landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide
benefits necessary to accommodate increased development and traffic demand through
increased vehicular capacity, increased vehicular/pedestrian safety, increased vehicular
mobility, and increased vehicular level of service
Median breaks shall occur only at major signalized intersections as determined by the
City Engineer. Alternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic
analysis and subject to the review and approval oCthe City Engineer,
2. Median Design - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide access control
and a unifying landscape statement. The median will feature basic types of planting.
Accent tree planting (Crape myrtle), underplanted with a Iow evergreen groundcover, will
be provided as median noses. Evergreen trees (Rhus lancea), underplanted with shrubs
and groundcover, will be planted throughout the balance of the median.
F. Foothill Boulevard Site Development Standards
1. Setbacks - Activity Center (Suburban Parkway in Parenthesis)
Building
Streetsidem 1*~ Floor ' 2"~ Floor ParkinR
Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue Activity Center:
Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 25 feet* 45 feet
(45 feet) (4S-foot average, 30-foot minimum)
Milliken Avenue 25 feet* 25 feet* 45 feet
(45-foot average, 30-foot minimum)
Foothill Boulevard/Rochester Avenue Activity Center:
Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 45 feet* 45 feet
(45 feet) (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum)
Rochester 25 feet* 45 feet* 45 feet
Avenue (4§-foot average, 30-foot minimum)
¢) As measured from ultimate curb face
* Refer to Section 17.30.040, Terra Vista Community Plan or Victoria Community Plan
for additional regulations.
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A14"
17.32-54 2/01
Rancho Cucamon~a Development Code Sections 17.30.060
E. Special Emphasis Areas.
1. Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both sides of Haven Avenue from Foothill
Boulevard south to 4th Street. Haven Avenue is a major nodh-south travel route and
contains high-end office development with the unique combination of direct access to the
Ontario Airpod and the Interstate 10 Freeway. The standards in the Oveday District are
designed to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high-q uality,
and prestigious gateway into the community. A progressive, sophisticated, and urban
style of development is required and special site planning and landscaping requirements
are included to enhance the pedestrian environment and create a campus-like
atmosphere.
2. ' Interstate 15 (Devore Freeway) runs north-south through the Industrial area and borders
seven subareas in each land use category except for General Industrial/Rail Served.
Since this area is directly south of the future regional mall and related commercial
activities at the I-15 Freeway and Foothill Boulevard, and views along the freeway have
a major impact on the image and identity of Rancho Cucamonga, highest consideration
should be given to design aspects that affect a positive image of the community as
viewed from the freeway. Special considerations ara contained in the Development
Standards for each subarea which abuts the I-15 Fraeway. (An I-15 Oveday District could
provide special development criteria to eliminate unsightly views.)
3. Special Boulevards. The General Plan states that travel routes are predominant
elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual
districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent
design theme is necessary to reinforce the image of perception of a route. Within the
Industrial districts, nine special boulevards are included. The foilowing is a brief
description of the primary function and identity for the most significant special boulevards
including Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Archibald Avenue, and 4th
Street.
a. Foothill BouleVard serves as the major east-west transportatic~n corridor through the
City. It also links the area east of Haven Avenue including the planned
communities and regional shopping mall with the commercial area to the east.
Within the Industrial districts (Subareas 6 & 7), new development along Foothill
Boulevard must provide a transition to commercial and office facilities within the
Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans and the Etiwanda Specific Plan areas,_
and shall comply with Section 17.32.060, Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines and
· the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Given the high, J
visibility, office and commercial service type uses will predominate. Any light
manufacturing or warehouse buildings will have to be designed to the highest
quality and be compatible with commercial and rasidenfial environments on the
north side of Foothill Boulevard.
b. Amhibald Avenue serves primarily as a support service function to the Industrial
araa. A variety Of industrial, commercial, and rasidential uses exist along major
portions of the straet. The major opportunity along Archibald Avenue is on the west
side of the street south of 6th Street. New development in this area must be
compatible with adjacent residential uses and provide an appropriate transition in
terms of architecture, site planning, and landscaping. One story buildings in scale
with the single family homes fronting on 6th Street and pedestrian connections to
residential should be provided.
DRCDCA 01-02
EXHIBIT "A15"
17.30-43 6/99
ORDINANCE NO. ~---~7~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT DRCTVCPA01-01, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH
STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT
PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan
Amendment DRCTVCPA01-01, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Ordinance, the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng
on that date.
3. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date,
4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public headng on January 16, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within Term Vista Community
Plan.
b. On September 19, 1991, the Terra Vista Community Plan was amended by
Ordinance No. 457 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the
Foothill Boulevard District.
c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street
furniture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifTing the streetscape,
promote cohesiveness and preserve Historic Route 66.
d. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DRCTVCPA01-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
January 16, 2002
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development; and
b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the.Development
Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan and .
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby appEov, es Terra,Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC'rVCPA01-01 by the
adoption of the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
cITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Victoria
Community Plan, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT 'Al" ~/--./
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
DESIGN SUPPLEMENT
Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan,
Victoria Community Plan, and Industrial Area Specific Plan.
I. INTRODUCTION
WHAT IS THIS SUPPLEMENT ABOUT?
On Septembor 16,1987, the Oty Council approved the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP). The
FBSP was enacted to pwvide a uni/ied development scheme/or the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the
toe-/her the v/sua] as~ of this commerce1 roadway.
'Missing Link' Area · ·
Victorla~
0
Figure I - Missing Link Area
The port,on of Foothili Bouleva~'~J ~ Haven ~Ye~Ue
not a pa~t of the b-]~-~:~i¢ p]an stuc¥ therefi~e, its pwYi~Jo~ clid
in~ link." At the time of the FBSP approval, the Oty Council and Plannin~ Commission expressed a d_~re to
include sisnlflcant design provisions of the plan in the development of the "missing link." This amendment
to the Te~a Vista Community Plan (TVCP), the Victoria Communil7 Plan' (VCP), and the Industrial Ama
Specific Plan (ISP) is proposed to include specific streetscape design provisions of the ~ in the develop-
ment of the properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard. ..
WHERE DOES IT APPLY?
The following provisions will apply t~ all properties bordering Foothill Boulevard within the TVCP,
VC~, and ISP. This amendment augments the development re~mlatlons and standards of the 'I'v'CP, VC~, and
ISP. When an issue, condition, or situation occurs Which is not covered or provided for in t~is amendment or
pmvisiens of the TVCP, VC~, or ISP, the msulalions of the Develo¥, nmt Code of the City of Rancho
Cu,'~mon~a that are most applicable to the issue, condition, or situation shall apply.
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 ·
II. COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT
The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is intended to extend the concepts of the Foothill Boule-
vard Specific Plan to the "missing link" through the creation of a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of
high quality with a unifying community design image reflective of the community heritage and identity,
providing an economically viable setting for a balanced mixture of commercial and residential uses with safe,
effident circulation and access.
Develop a sUeetscape system which designales major intersections as acfivily centers and emphasizes
Promote ,compatible building elevations which afford a human scale at pedestrian areas and provide
transitions to buildings of greater height, while protecting ,[djo'ming resid~tial condilions.
Promote appropriate landscape treatments throughout the corridor, partic-t=~'ly those that are low
maintenance, drought tolerant, and wind resistant within intense mban conditions.
Provide for the control of visually objectionable views, such as outdoor storage and loading
areas, throu~ proper sim deagn ~1 ~
DevoJop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a "heritage"
statement for Foothill Boulevard.
Require complianoe with community design guidelines in plans for new.development and expansion
or redevelopment of existing development and make community des/gn a major consideration in site pla~
Formal forms and'conflgUratlOns should be utilized at activity center nodes while less formal conngurauon~
should be v.~i~d throughout the parkway ~ between node~
Designate spedal landscape and architectural features at major intersections. Combine thematic
plantings with contemporary architectural statements designed to promote a distinc~ve chara~iex for the
activity centers. Changes in paving materials, lighting, signing, and siting of adjacent structures should occur
at major intersections to enhance their disfinctlv~__~
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVGPA 01-01
EXHIBIT 'A3"
III. DESIGN GUIDELINES
A. ACTIVITY CENTERS:
Activity centers are s~iected int~'secfiofis alon~ the Foothill l~oulevard corridor defined as "l'heme" or
'Statement" areas which "fie" IoSether I~e visual aSlX, Cts of the Foothill Boulevard corridor throu~ the city,
promote concen~'ated activity at these areas, and i~ive identity and theme to the areas in wi~ich they am
ACTIVITY CENTERS
Figure 2 - A~I~ ~er
~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ Av~ue ~ ~ ~y ~r ~y d~, ~ d~
~ pu~ic ~t~-~y-~, ~ ~ ~ ~H~g s~s app~ o~y m ~ M~ A~e ~
s~ ~ p~ ~ u~i~a ~ ~ ~y ~, ~1o~ ~
2. Site PlanninG:
a. At activity centers, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to
ovate a more appealing, active st~,etscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene are
spec~_¢~ny prolu*bited.
b. Multi-story bul]din~ shall be desig~cl to ~_]a te to the pedesO'ian level. AU gmu~l
story facades shah be designed to ~,late to the human r~:ale. This ca~ be accomplished through the breaking
of facades into beys a~l the sis~age brought down in size and location. Further, this reduction in _~,~]e can be
es~abllshed through the use of de~n~is which add horizontal articulation to the facades. Examples of these
elements include pedesOian arcades and awnings. (MiUiken & Rochester only.)
c. Buildings ~ be desired to eliminate a ~ra .8~. ted, sO'ip comme~ia] appearance
a~! should be oriented to the acflwty center (Milliken & Rochester omyl.
d. Architecture and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed
and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diver~e and stimulatin~
and should inelude activities that create a sense of variety and interest (Milliken & Rochester om'y)..
e~su~ ease of aoces~ from one site to adjoining sites in a ~mfe man~e~
the Footh~l Boulevard nght-ofoway. This may include direct entrances from rootmu ~omevar~,
in the buildings that aliow access to the interior p!~,~ areas, or other appropriate methods.
~. Architectural Concept: "
Witldn individual activity centre', the architectural style should, be cousiste~t to
provide confin~y of design at the interaction.
· 1. Milliken Activity Center- There a~ no exisfin8 buildings located at the Milliken
activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Review process will eslablish the flavor for the area
when reviewing the development proposals. New developments need ~ot "duplicate" the m~.hitectura] style
of previous submittals but must be compatibte in to,.~ of a~chitecture and orie~tafien with the other
. ....
2. Rochester Activity Center - New propo~Is shall cons~de~ and res~ tire
architectural style of e~dsling buildings. For example, the A~7otli Winery at the southeast corn~ of
Foothill and Rochester, is a potential National Historic Registry candidate. Any proposals for this activity
center should be designed to be compatible with this structure. This does not mean that new proposals must
emulate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must ~omplem~t existing buildings.
b. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the second, floor in recog~fion of the ' '
differences in the chara~:~.r of activities at the g~otmd floor level. Examples include, but are not iirrdted to, the
use of storefront glass, stepped-back or tiered forms, fenestration, and other appropriate archltectund- .f~tures
facing Foothill Boulevard, l~iiUken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue.
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "A5"
?,~, Page5 au~m'~'~-:-:i ~~'
4. Landscape Collcept: The activity centers shall be distinguished from suburban (informal)
parkway areas through the use of formal, urban tree planting~ These formal plantings shall border aU
actvit~ centers and shall de,ne these'areas as being hlghe~ intensi~, urban dislricl3. The planfin~ shall
conzlst of an offset double row of Crape Myrtle CLagerstroemia indict) trees alon~ each road frontage. Addb
tonal plant materials ( evv, y~:en canopy trees, palms, etc.) may be inlxoduced to supplement the Crape
M),~'tle as a backdrop. The I~e and location of the additional r~terials should be based on the particular
buidin8 desi~% scale, and setback.
Formal 81reet
Two 8to~y Buiidbqg
Enrfi:hed Cro~
Wa~ Pev~'~
B. SUBURBAN PARKWAYS:.
1. Streetscape: '
a. The parkways will be designed with informal dusters °f t~'es, r°lling tuff berms' and
meandering/undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral, suburban q. nlifies. '~XJr
'2. Architectural Concept: .
The arch~tecm~ characteristics shaU be ~ovemed by the e~istir~ sta~isrcls of the
Development C. ode~ TVCP, VCP, and ~P.
b. In sflua~ons where buildlr~s are h¥~ly visu'ble h-om the side s~eets and/or ad~ac~t
parkin~ are~ specia~ emphasis, sha~ be placed on creafin~ archilecturalinte~st.
~. lanOSCape concept: The plamin~s wi~ comist o~ ~r~ormal treatments, doraL, rated by
London Plane (PlataUus aCerffo~ia), ~li~omia Sycamore (p~atanus racemosa)~ and Mowe~in~ Plum (Prunus '
c~rasi~ra) ~ Other s~es may ~ used to ac~e~t a~/or suppleme~t ~ desi~ai~l tree types. The
type and loc~fion of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with ~ development
C. pAFiKWA¥ TRANSmON~.' In orde~ lo provide a gradual transillon fr°m the urban activity
Parkway Iransitions are designed Io blend the fennel hardscape and tree planting pattern of the activity
parkway b'ansilion is characterized by a 75-Ax)t Io 1504oot zone, dominated by Flowering Plum _0~__: Other
t~e sFecies may be introduced to supplement the Flowering Plum to assist in creating a smooth,transition.
,.. .,' '.. - . .~,:,!~,,,~ ·
.......... . ....\\--.. ....... ..--,
6' Meimderlng Sidewalk
Primary Parkway ~A°°°nt Tree (Flowering Plum)
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01. Ti:oe (Sycmmor.) MoumJed Tm'f
EXHIBIT
Figure 5 - Parkway Transition
D. GENERAL GUIDELINES:
i. Site Plannins:
a. Buildings shall be s/ted to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand
the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating
and allowing wider sidewalks on the boulevard. *. .
b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedeslrian/vehicular conflicte.
Driveways and service areas shall be.located to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian drculation in
c. All auto related facilities (i.e. working bays, storage, eta) shall be oriented/screened
away imm public view.
d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as
permitted by the applicable Community er Specific Plan), and other high intensity pedestrian trees on the
ground levels of all buildings within activity cents~.
a.. Whenever poss~le, entries shall be located on side oh,-*ets in order to mlnimize pedes-
trian/vehicular conflicts, When this is not Poss~le, the Foothill Boulevard site entry shall be designed with
appropriately patterned concrete or paves (behind the public fight-of-way) to differentiate it imm the
sidewalks.
b. Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side st~ets, shall be
located as/ar from Slreet inter~."dons as Pas.q/hie. :
c. . Parkingareasshallbedeslgnedsothatpadesttianswalkparallelto'm°vingvehicies
d. Individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which
where vehicular connections to adjacent properties are located. The appucant must mso oemons~rme
sions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properlies consistent with approved
master plans. ·
e. Paridng areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the slreet
sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement. This can be accomplished by uslng design
landscape Vesl0n:
a. Ail street f~mitum, light standards, bollards, and simller hardware within 10 $eet
the public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may
b. A celorful landscape edge shall be established a[ the base of buildings- Asphalt edges
at the base of sh'uchu~ are pro}fiblted. Plant materials in containers are appropriate.
DRCVCPA 0'I-03/DRC'rVGPA 01-01
EXHIBIT
c. Internal pedestrian circulation, linking office complexes with neighboring commero
cial or office developments, should be located dose to buildings.
d. Plantingdusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement The diversity of
massin~ t~q~s s~ould be sreat e~ou§h to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural
feeling to the obeerver.
Water conserving plantings and irrigation shall be used in ali landscaped areas.
e.
(Refer to Cit~ Ordinance No. 411- Xeriscape.) .
4. Streetscape Ughtlng:
a. It is the intent of sl~el~cape lishting to'add a consistent, planned l°ok for Foothill
Boulevard during day and evenin& ho~s. Mghfing can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the
streetscape design.
b. A~] EShfing f[xtares in the pubEc ri~ht-of-way shall be cons~stant alon~ Footh~l
Boulevard and approved by the City En~ follow~ recommendations of the Plannin~ Cornmission.
MaterJais shall be consistent and in keepin~ with the desired theme. Poles and supportin~ hardware shall be
c. All development areas ou~de the public fight-of-way shall use high pmssare
sodium li~ht~. Ali direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the b~ldin~ site.
IV. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
A. Center Median Pro_aram - Based upon t~affic analyses, a continuous 14-foot wide
landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide benefits n~ry to
accommodate increased development and traffic demand in the foliowinS areas:
· ~ v~t~]lar ]el~J of service
Median b3~eaks shall occar on~ at major si~li~l inte3~sections as det~m~ned by the City En~.
Alternate median breaks.may be considered subject to a detailed traffic safet7 anal)sis and subject to I~e
review a~! approval of the City En~ine~.
B. ~ - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide acoeds control and a
unif~ landscape Statement. The median wfl! featu~ two basic t~pes of planlin~. Ac~e~-~t tree plantin§
(Crape myrfle)~ underplanted with a Iow everg~en ~roundcovm'~ will be provided at median noses. Evm'-
~een trees (Rhus lancea), ~derplanted with shrabs and groundcover, will be planted through°at
ba]a~e of the me~a~ (See Rs~re 63
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT
/~ (CRAI~ MYRTLE) TRIANGULAR SPACING 6'AZ 15ct~O~J~'~ 18' C~ PAVER
MAINTENANC~ F. DGE
RI'IUS LAIiCF. A 30' O.C.
MAJOR EVERGn~F~q ~
CO"C~T~ PAV~.RS ~,/ TmC,. ~ I .
.MORTAR ~
DETAIL. SECTION ~"~o ,
NTS
PARKWAY/MEDIAN ACCENT
/ MAJOR EVF. J~GREEN
/ ~ (RHUS L~.Cr~) .
· ~'~. ~~; / -- 6' CURB W/'tS' HARDSCAI~-
$'-0' Ctl~AR ZONE '-% ,~ ,~ ~.ld~4 ,/ / MAli'TF. NANCI~
-- ' ""-r~'` T' --'"i"; ,
£"~ i ~=~' SECTION
Figure 6 - Median DeSign
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRC'I'VCP^ 01-01
EXHIBIT "Al0" Page 10
V. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. ~tbecks - Activity Center (Suburban Parkway in oarenthesis)
Building.
~ 1st ]:loor ~
Fooihill~viiilike~ Activity Center:.
· Foothill 25' (45') 25" ( · ) 4~' (49' avg, 30' rain)
· ~m,'k~ 28' (-~) 25'(~) 45' (4~' avg, 30' mir0
· Foothill 25' (45') 45'(~) 45' (4~' avg, 30' rain)
· R~esU~ 2~' (-~) 4~' (-~) 45' (4~' avg, 30' rain)
(1) As measured f~om ultlmate curb face
( ~ ) Refer to TVCP, VCP, or ISP for re,relations
/~1:1 Building Setback Retie
~4~z. .; :- .>. ~ 2ncl Story Permitted at Milliken
SS' '"' *"' ""~'"'"' ......
Figure 7 - Activity.Center Building Setback
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 , ,
EXHIBIT 'Al1" Pa, ge 11
· Adjacent to F. xisUn§ or
Planned ResidenUal 25' ( ~ ) 1~' ( -~ )
Development
· Ad,acer to existing or
Planned Commercial 0'(*) 5'(-~)
Development
B. Hei_aht Limitations - Activity Centers
· within 45' of s~et curb face:
Foothill Boulevard (at lV-_iilt'ken}
~)othfll Boulevard (at l~chester)
]~(iilli~n Avenue
Rochester Avenue
· Within 100' of sin~e family residential district
· O~he~ locnfions
· Towe~s, campaniles, rotundas
(1) Re,er to TVCP, VCP, ISP for suburban parkway are~.
( ~ ) Refer to TVC~, VCP, or ISP for regulations
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "A12"
s~n~ Page 12 ?z! ~/t~5
ORDINANCE NO. ~7'7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-03, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH
STREETSCAPE STANDARDS KNOWN AS THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THAT
PORTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoda Community Plan
Amendment DRCVCPA01-03, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this
Ordinance, the subject Victoda Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of December 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng
on that date.
3. On the 16th day of January 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption.of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically findsthat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Par[A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on January 16, 2002, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to Foothill Boulevard located within Victoria Community
Plan.
. . b. On September 19, 1991, the Victoria Community Plan was amended by Ordinance
'~ -" No. 458 to establish certain streetscape and site design standards consistent with the Foothill
Boulevard District.
c. The application will expand the streetscape design by establishing uniform street
... fumiture, hardscape, and other elements along Foothill Boulevard, thus unifying the streetscape,
promoting cohesiveness, and preserving Historic Route 66.
d. The application will not have a significant impact on the environment.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCAVCPA01-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the
General Plan-and with related development; and
b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development
Code and the Victoria Community Plan; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-03 by the
adoption of the attached Exhibit "A."
6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan, the Victoria
Community Plan, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
DESIGN SUPPLEMENT
Amending the Terra Vista Community Plan,
Victoria Community Plan, and Industrial Area Specific Plan.
I. INTRODUCTION
WHAT IS THIS SUPPLEMENT ABOUT?
On September 16, 1987, the City Council approve~l the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP). The
FBSP was enacted to provide a unified development scheme for the Foothill Boulevard con~dor through the
community. Of prime importance to the FBSP are the special streetscapo design provisions which "tie"
toðar the visual aspects of this commercial roadway.
'Missing Link' Area
¥ictoria~
I! l! //"'
o
Figure I - Missing Link Area
The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the'Interstate 15 Freeway (l-15) was
not a part of the spedfic plan study; thereforo, ils provisions did not apply to the development of this "miss-
inl~ link." At the time of the FBSP approval, the City Council and Plarmin~ Commission expressed a desire to
include significant desi~;n provisions of the plan in the development of the "missin~ link." This amendment
to the Terra Vista Community Plan (TVCP), the Victoria Community.Plan (VCP), and the Industrial Ama
Specific Plan (ISP) is proposed to include specific streetscapo design provisions of the ~ in the develop-
ment of the prolx'rties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard.
WHERE DOES ff APPLY?
The. followins provisions will apply to all properties borderin§ Foothill Boulevard within the TVCP,
VCP, and ISP. This amendment au~;menls the development mb, ulations and standards of the TVCP, VCP, and
iSP. When an issue, cendJfion, or situation occurs which is not covered or provided for in this amendment or
provisions of the TVCP, VCP, or ISP, the regulations of the Development Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamon~a that am most applicable to the issue, condition, or siluation shall apply.
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRC'l-VCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "A2" Page 2
II. COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT
The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is intended to extend the concepts of the Foothill Boule-
vard Specific Plan to the "missing link" through the creation of a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of
high quality with a unifying community design image reflective of the community heritage and identity,
providing an economically viable setting for a balanced mixture of commercial and residential uses with safe,
effident circulation and access.
A. GOAL:
Create a community image that exp _res__~_ and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho
Cucamon~a.
Develop a st~etscape system which designates major ini~ections as activity centers and emphasizes
the suburban parkways between the activity centers as vehicular areas.
Promote compatible building elevations which afford a human scale at pedest~rian areas and provide
transitions to buildings of greater height, while protecting adjoining residential conditions.
Promote appropriate landscape treatments throughout the corridor, particularly those that are Iow
maintenance, drought tolerant, and wind resistant within intense urban conditions.
Provide for the control of vis,,~lly objectionable views, such as outdoor storage and loading
areas, through proper site design and screening.
Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a "heritage"
statement for Foothill Boulevard. . ·
Require compliance with community design guidelines in plans for ~ew development and expansion
or redevelopment of existing development and make community design a major consideration in site plan
review and approval.
Utilize landscape mat~erials which are clean, safe, wind resistant, and relatively low maintenance.
Formal forms and configurations should be utilized at activity center nodes while less formal configurations
should be ufili?-'~l ti~ou~hout the parkway linkz between nodes.
Designate special landscape and architectural features at major intersections. Combine thematic
plantings with contemporary architectural statements designed to promote a distinctive character for the
activity ceni~, ~. Changes in paving materials, lighting, signing, and siting of adjacent structures should occur
at major intersections to enhance their distinctiveness.
DRGVGPA 0q-03/DIRCTVGPA Oq-01
EXHIBIT "A3""
Page 3
III. DESIGN GUIDELINES
A. ACTIVITY CENTERS:
Activity centers are selected inl~rsections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor defined as 'Theme" or
~Sta[~,,ent" areas which "tie" ~ the visual aspecls of the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the dry,
promote concenl~ated activity at t.lx.~ areas, and give identity and theme to the areas in which they are
located. The activity centers are located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in Figure 2.
ACTIVITY CENTERS
Figure 2 - Actlvl~ ~nter Lo~tions
~ ~ ~m~ of ~ ~ Av~ue ~t~on ~ ~y or ~y d~o~, ~ dev~-
opment ~o~ of ~e a~ ~t~ am ~ to ~ s~a~ ~ ~d~a~ ~v~ ~t~n
· e public fi~t~f-~y. ~om, ~y of ~e follo~g s~d~s apply offiy to ~e M~k~ Av~ue and
R~t~ A~ue a~ ~
1. Str~:
a. ~l b~d~ ofien~fio~ ~11 mla~ W ~e F~ ~ev~ ~n~. ~e building
~t~ck ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n~ ~ s~ ~a~ ~H~, fo~ l~d~ ~n~
b. S~a~ el~ ~ ~ ~l~ds, ~w~.~ s~ ~ng ~ls, Hght.
VISu~
c. ~e ~n~ ~n ~e a~ ~ is to ~mte a fo~, ~l~]y ~,
sff~t ff~ p~ ~stem u~ a ~1~ of ~o~y ~, ~1o~ ~
d. ~e ~ or fo~ s~ d~ ~a~fic of ~e a~ ~ ~ould
~tend ~on~ F~ ~ev~ ~ ~nd~/~fin~ s~ ~ a ~int of ]o~ ffa~ifion ~ ~e
sub~ ~ay. T~i~y, ~e d~i~ ~H ~nd ~ at I~st ~e ~t ~veway or ~ ~ ~u~
d~i~ ~ew pr~ ~e ~nt of ~ ~ s~ shoed ~ able to adjust m ~ in public
o~-way ~ndifiom, su~ ~ fish[ ~m ~ ~ b~ ~.
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRC~CPA 01-01
EXHI B IT "A4" Page 4 7~]
///
2. Site Planning:
a. At activity centers, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to
create a more appealing, active si~etscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the stmetscene are
specifically prohibited.
b. Multi-story buildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level. All ground
story facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale. 'Yhis can be accomplished through the breaking
of facades into bays and the signage brought down in size and location. Further, this reduction in scale can be
established through the use of elements which add horizontal articulation to the facades. Examples of these
elements include pedes~-ian arcades and awnings. (Milliken & Rochester only.)
c. Buildings ~ be designed to eliminate a fragmented, strip commercial appearance
and should be oriented to the a~vity center (Milliken & Rochester only).
d. Archilecture and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed
and oriented toward the pedes~ian experience. The experience should be visually diverse and slimulafing
and should include activities that create a sense of variety and interest (Milliken & Rochester only).
e. Structures, pathways, and landscaping shall be incorporated within the site so as to
ensure ease of acce~ from one site lo adjoining sites in a safe manner.
f. Building entrances shall be designed to accommodate logical pedestrian access from
the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. This may include direct entrances lmm Foothill Boulevard, separations
in the buildings that allow acc~,, to the interior plaza areas, or other appropriate methods..
3. Architectural Concept:
a. Within individual activity center, the architectural style should be consistent lo
provide continuity of design at the intersection.
1. MilLiken Activity Center- There ar~ no existing buildings located at the Milliken
activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Review process will establish the flavor for the area
when reviewing the development proposals. New developments need not "duplicate" the architectural style
of previous submittals but must be compatible in terms of architecture and 0~entafion with the othel'
comer(s) of the intersection~ .
2. Rochester Activity Center, New proposals shall consider and respect the
architectural style of existing buildings. For example, the A~==otti Winery at the southeast corner of
Foothill and Rochester, is a potential National Historic Registry candidate. Any proposals for this activity
center should he designed to be compalible with this structure. This does not mean that new proposals must
emulate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must complement existing buildings.
b. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the secondfloor in recognition of the
differences in the character of activities at the ground floor level. Examples indude, but are not limited to, the
use of storefront glass, stepped-back or tiered forms, fenestration, and other appropriate architectural/eatures
facing Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue.
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "A5"
4. Landscape Concept: The activity cen~ers shall be distinguished/rom suburban (informal)
parkway areas through ~he use of formal, urban ~ plantings. These formal plantings shall border all
activity cen~rs and shall define tb,~e~__ areas as being higher intensity, urban dislrict~ The plantings shall
consist of an offse~ double row of Crape Myrtle (Lagers~'oemia indica) ~ along each road fl'on~age. Addi-
tional plant materials ( evo~,,~en canopy trees, palms, e~c.) may be introduced Io supplement the Crape
Myrtle as a backdrop. The type and location of the additional materials should be based on the particular
buiding design, scale, and selbac~
Tree Planting
Street Access to
Two Story Builcling
Fountain.Element.
Enriched Cross
Walk Paving
ACTIVITY CEN. 'i~ER/JNTERSECTiON CONCEPT
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCWCPA 01-01
FoundaUon 7D1
EXHIBIT "A6" Planting ] [~
B. SUBURBAN PARKWAYS:
1. Streetscape: '
a. The parkways will be designed with informal dusters of trees, rolling tuff berms, and
meandering/undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral, suburban q-aUties. ~J-~)C+ ac~e~
b. SU'eet~.ape elements such as bollaFds, cFosswalks with special paving, light standaFds, ]
and street furni .t?e shall be identical .ir). style and finish to those used_in the FBSP area,, ~
t:3oOt.~O.~r~/,,eoc3'n~ ~': Il/SO't/ /~tp,Roo~/'-t~,;~ /'z4.~.
ArohlMo~ural Concept:
a. The architectural eharae/erisfic~ shall be ~ovemed by the existing standards o~ the
Development Code, TVCP, VCP, and ISP.
b. In ~imafions where builcling~ are highly vis~le ~Tom the ~ide sl~ and/or adjace~
parking area~, ~:ial empha~i~ ~ be placed on creatin8 architectural lntere~/.
3. LandsOal~ ooncept: The plan~nl~ will comist of intormal UeaUnen~, domina~l
LOndon Plane ~lata~us acer~folia), California $¥~more (Plalanus raeemo~a), and flowering Plum (Pnmus
~eza~era) I~ee~. Other ~l~:ies ma)' be u~ci to a~ent and/or ~pplement the~e designated ~ I~es. The
type and lo~fion of/here sl~:ie~ shoukl be ~vie~eci in conjunction with speeffic development propo~l~-
O. PARKWAY TRANSITIONS: In order to pro~de a gradual t~an~fl~on from the urban aetivit~
~e~., a to I~e ~uburba~ informal parkways, "parkway transitions" will be intn~clueed along the corridor.
?~rkwa¥ U-an~fions are desi~,ned ~ blencl I~e [ormal harcl~a~e and tree p]a~l~ng pattern o~ the aetivit~
parkway h'an~tfion is eharac~.zed b~ a 754oo~ to 1504ool ~one, dominated by ~iowe~n8 Plum I~es. Other
l~e ~peeies ma)' be inb'odueed t? ~upp1emem the flowering ?lure to a~ist in cretin8 a ~ooth U'ansifion.
:=~/~ ' ...
· -
Meandering Sidewalk ~ .
~ Primary Parkway · ~cent T~ee (Flowering Plum)
DRCVOPA 01-03/DRO~CPA 01-01 Tree (Sycamore} Mounded Turf
EXHIBIT "AT"
Figure 5 - Par~ay Transition
D. GENERAL GUIDELINES:
1. Site PI~:
a. Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand
the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating plaTas
and allowing wider sidewalks on the boulevard.
b. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts.
Driveways and service areas shall be located to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian circulation in
and around the site.
c. All auto related fadlifies (i.e. working bays, storage, etc.) shall be oriented/screened
away from public view.
d. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as
p~,ixitted by the applicable Community or Specific Plan), and other high intensity pedes~'ian uses on the
ground levels of all buildings within a~vity cent, s.
2. Parking Lots:
a. Whenever possible, entries shall be located on side st~ets in order to minimize pedes-
trian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible, the Foothill Boulevard site entry shall be designed with
appropriately patterned concrete or pavers (behind the public right-of-way) to differentiate it from the
sidewalks.
b. Parking access points, whether iocat~od on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, shall be
located as far from street intersections as possible.
c. . Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles
and minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles.
d. Individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are
dearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. New development projects shall delineate on ail plans
where vehiOdar connections to adjacent properties are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provio
sions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved
master plans.
e. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the sheet
sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement. This can be accomplished by using design
foatures such as waikways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments.
3. Landscape Design:
a. All steer furniture, light standards, bollards: and similar hardware within 10 lreet of
the public right-oir-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may
vary and match related architecture.
b. A colorful landscape edge shall be established at the base oir buildings, Asphalt edges
at the base of structures are prohibited. Plant materials in containers are appropriate.
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "A8'
~u~n~u Page 8 7/91
c. Internal pedestrian circulation, linking office complexes with neighboring commer-
cial or office developments, should be located dose to buildings.
d. Planting dusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of
massing types should be great enough to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural
feeling to the observer.
e. Water conserving plantings and irrigation shall be used in all landscaped areas.
(Re~er to City Ordinance No. 411-Xeriscape.)
4. Streetscape Ughtlng:
a. It is the intent of ~;.~etscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill
Boulevard during day and evening hours. Lighting can have a dramatic e~fect on the quality of the
stteetscape design.
b. All lighting fixtures in the public right-of-way shall be consistent along Foothill
Boulevard and approved by the City Engineer following recommendations of the Planning Commission.
Materials shall be consistent and in keeping with the desired theme. Poles and supporting hardware shall be
c. All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure
sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site.
IV. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
A. Center Median Proqram - ~ased upon traffic analyses, a continuous 14-foot wide raised
landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide benefits necessary to
accommodate increased developn~nt and Iraffic demand in the following areas:
· Increased vehio,~/podesu'ian safety
· Increased vehicular level of service.
Median breaks shall occur only at major signalized in tel~..:'~ffdons as determined by the City Engineer.
Ah~n~ate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic safety analysis and subject to the
review and approval of the City Engine~.
1~. ~ - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide access conlzol and a
unifying landscape statement. The median will feature two basic types of planting. Accent t~e planting
(Crape myrtle), underplanted with a low evergreen groundcover, will be provided at median noses. Ever-
green trees (Rhu$ lancea), underplanted with shrubs and groundcover, will be planted throughout the
balance of the median. (See Figure 6.)
DRGVGPA 01-03/DRG'FVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT
Page 9
MEDJAN ACCENT TRF~S
(CRAPE MYRTLE) TRIANGULAR SPAC~HG
RHUS LAHCEA 30' O.C.
MAJOR EVERGREEN TREE
/ -- EXPANS ON ~
CONCRETE PAVERS IN ! TYPICAL 2~ ~
MORTAR BED
DETAIL SECTION ~ ~'U ~," -,"
NTS
_
PARKwAY/MEDIAN ACCENT TREE
.~ CRAPE MYRTLE
/' MAJOR EVERGREEN I~AN TREE
/ ~ (RHUS LANCEA)
5"0' CLEAR ZONE · ,~,,, 3. / / MAINTENANCE EDGE
..~,' .f
· ~ · [__/.~ EDGE OF MAINTENANCE EDGE
EO. i tQ. SECTION
14'-0= TYI~CAL I~ BLOCK LOCATION
Figure 6 - Median Design
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "Al0" Page 10
//7
V. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Setbacks - Activity Center ¢Suburban Parkway In _parenthesis)
l~uilding
~ 1st Floor ~
Foothill/Milliken Activity Center.
· Foothill ?.5' (45') 25' (~) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain)
· Milliken 25' ( -'~ ) 25' (-~) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain)
Foothill/Rocheste~ Activity Center:.
· Foothill 25'(45') 45' ( ',~ ) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain)
· Rochester 25' (-~) 45' ( -,~ ) 45' (45' avg, 30' rain)
(1) As measured from ultimate curb face
( -~ ) Refer to TVCP, VCP, or ISP for regulations
1:1 euilding $®tbaok Rutlo
~ .. ~ 2nd Story Permitted ut Mllliknn
~.¢',
"to ° -
Figure 7 - Activity Center Building Setback
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01 ,
EXHIBIT "Al 1" Page 11
· Adjacent to Existing or
Planned Residential 25' ( -$ ) 15' ( -.$ )
: Development
· Adjacent to e~Jn~ or
Planned Commerdal 0'(~) 5'(~)
Development
Interior Side Property. TJn~ ]hgJfl~g ~..azJdng
· Adjacent to Existing or
Planned Residential
DeveloIanent 25' ( -~ ) 15' ( -~ )
· Adjacent to Existing or
Development 5'(~) 5'(~)
B. Heiqht Limitations - Activity Centers (1)
· Within45' of ~eet curb face:
Foothill Boulevard (at Miiliken) 35'
Foothill Boulevard (at Rochester) 20'
Milliken Avenue 35'
Rochester Avenue 20'
· Wifi~n 100' of single family residenl~l district 25'
· Other locations (~)
· Towors, campaniles, rotundas ~ ~ )
(1) Refer to TVCP, VCP, ISP for suburban parkway areas.
( ~ ) Refer to TVCP, VCP, or ISP for regulations
DRCVCPA 01-03/DRCTVCPA 01-01
EXHIBIT "A12"
s~.~n~. Page 12 7m / / ~
Chaffey College
March 2002
Bond Measure Facts
The March 5, 2002 Bond Measure L for Chaffey Community College District addresses
necessary facility repair, rehabilitation, modernization, and new construction
requirements. The projects identified in Measure L are designed to better serve
students and the community. Measure L covers current and future needs and projects
that will extend from 2002 through 2014, with a total bond package amount of
$230,000,000.
· The current main campus site in Rancho Cucamonga was built in the late 1950s.
With the exception of two buildings and a library expansion, the campus has
changed very little since then. Because of exceedingly limited state funds
availab'le for scheduled maintenance, many of the existing buildings need
upgrading/renovation, particularly with respect to heating, plumbing, electrical
and lighting systems. Parking lots, sidewalks and pathways are in disrepair and
must be replaced. In fact, the state reduced the college budget for scheduled
maintenance this year by two-thirds.
· In 1960 upon opening the current campus the student population was 5,200.
Today, the college has more than 18,000 students, with more than 16,000
students taking classes at the main campus. Many students also take classes at
one or more of the college centers in Chino, Fontana or Ontario. The state
chancellor's office predicts that Chaffey College will enroll more than 24,000
students by 2010. In order to accommodate this growth, college facilities must
be expanded.
· Additional facilities at the main campus will include a science complex, a visual
and performing arts center, and two additional instructional buildings. The
remaining buildings will benefit from renovation and upgrading.
· The satellite centers are heavily utilized and must be expanded to continue to
serve our students for whom travel to the main campus in Rancho Cucamonga is
difficult.
· The college is expecting a major explosion of population within the district,
especially in the southern portion, which has been primarily an agricultural area.
To improve educational opportunity and access to these residents, plans include
constructing a second full-service campus.
· The increase in tax rate will average $18.85 annually for $100,000 assessed
valuation.
· No proceeds from the bond will be used to pay salaries or administrative costs.
· The Governing Board will appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, consisting of
at least seven members, whose purpose is to inform the public concerning the
expenditure of the bond proceeds.
R A N C H O C U C a M O N G A
]~NGIN~EI21NG DEPAI~T~NT
Sti f:f Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A USED OIL RECYCLING
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND
UNDER THE USED OIL RECYCLING ENHANCEMENT ACT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the
application for a Used Oil Recycling Block Grant funds from the Used Oil Recycling
Fund under the Used Oil Recycling Enhancement Act.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City State Oil Recycling Enhancement Act (Act) (Statues 1991, Chapter 817)
mandates the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) to provide
annual Block Grants to local governments for establishing local collection programs that
encourage recycling of used oil. Because Block Grants are not competitive, local
governments only need to submit a completed application package and meet the
program's eligibility requirements to receive a grant.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been receiving Block Grant funds since 1994 and
has provided this valuable service to the community through the Permanent Household
Hazardous Waste Collection Facility (PHHWCF) and seven State Certified collection
sites.
This year, $0.024 per capita has been added to the Block Grant awards to provide
funds to establish collection opportunities and promote the recycling of used oil filters.
Grantees are required to incorporate filter recycling messages into existing used oil
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT
February 6, 2002
Page 2
recycling outreach materials as well as report on the number of filters collected. The
City of Rancho Cucamonga has been promoting this program for several years and has
set up a filter recycling collection program at both the HHW Facility and Kragen Auto
Supply.
Beginning January 1, 2002, grant funds may be used for specific storm water pollution
prevention expenses including but not limited to, acquisition, installation and
maintenance of storm drain inlet filters. The signature authority must self-certify that the
storm water management program is approved by the appropriate California Regional
Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB).
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BZ:dlw
Attachments
121
RESOLUTION NO. O2-O qq
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR A USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS FROM THE USED OIL RECYCLING FUND UNDER THE
USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Oil Recycling
Enhancement Act that provides funds to cities and counties for establishing and maintaining local
used oil collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal of used oil; and
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted Assembly Bill 1220 (Eastin,
1993) that provides grants to local governments to establish and implement waste diversion and
separation programs to prevent disposal of hazardous waste, including household hazardous waste,
in solid waste landfills; and
WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board has been delegated the
responsibility for the administration of these programs within the state, setting up necessary
procedures governing application by cities and counties under these programs; and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for
development of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA authorizes the submittal of grant application to the
California Integrated Waste Management board for all available grants under the California Oil
Recycling Enhancement Act and all available HHW grants under the California Integrated Waste
Management Act for the period of July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer, or his/her designee, is hereby
authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all necessary
applications, contracts, payment requests, agreements and amendments hereto for the purposes of
securing grant fimds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application.
/2?
THE CITY OF
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Members oflhe City Coundl
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
DATE: February 6, 2002
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT PAUL WILLIAMS TO THE LIBRARY
FOUNDATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appointment of Paul Williams to the Library
Foundation.
BACKGROUND
The Library Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Curatalo,
previously met to consider filling a vacancy on the Library Foundation.
It is recommended the City Council approve their recommendation of appointing Paul Williams
to complete the unexpired term of Amy Warshaw, which ends in June, 2002.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
City Clerk
T'H E C I T ¥ O F
l~AN C 1I 0 C U CAH 0 N GA
Staff Report
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON DMV OFFICE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA
As many of you are aware, the DMV office located at Hellman and 9th Street has
been closed for some time due to mold contaminating the building. Since that
building was closed, customers have had to go to other DMV offices in Fontana or
Pomona to get service.
The DMV does plan to fix and reopen the facility on Hellman but their projection for
completion of this work is 24 to 30 months. In the meantime the DMV has secured
an interim office here in the City at 8678 Archibald Ave. (at the corner of Archibald
and 9th Street) in what used to be a Calvary Chapel. This location will provide full
services in vehicle registration, driver licenses, and drive tests. This interim facility
will be open on March 6, 2002.
R~l~ectfully submitted,
Assistant to the City Manager
Feb 07 02 01:23p JRY COBB&MRRLEY 909 980 9469 p.1
Facsimile
FAX #: (909) 980-9469
TELE #: (909) 980-5092
Fax Cover This is a confidential message, intended solely for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you receive this message in error, please forward it to the
correct person, or mail it back to us. Thank you.
DATE: February 7, 2002
I "'-JAY, COBB & MARLEY
ATTENTION: Debbie Adams
ln//~ ~ento~ Appraisals · Business Valuations
COMPANY: City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ JENNIFER I. IIRIGUGLIO
TELE #: (909)477-2700 MANAGING PARTNER
SENIOR APPRAISER
(800) 304-4769
FAX #: (909)477- 2846 8632 Archibald Avenue (909) 980-5092
Suite 202 Fax (909) 980-9469
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 www.jaycobbmarley
PAGES (Including this cover page): 1 of_/~
FROM: Jennifer Briguglio Bandy
CEO
SUBJECT: Copy of group letter referenced in last night's City Council Meeting
Re: DMV Temporary Location
I have also included a memo that went out to the existing tenants this
morning.
Feb O? 02 01:23p 3RY COBB&MRRLEY 909 980 9469
February 6, 2002
Mr. Alexander Moradi
Manager
ICC Investment Group
9301 Wilshirc Blvd., Ste. 315
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Dear Mr. Moradi:
On Thursday, January 313, the lessee's of the Rancho Technology Center (8632 Archibald
Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.) met to discuss our concerns regarding the occupancy of the
Department of Motor Vehicles in buildings located at both 8678 and 8632 Archibald Avenue. We
are all very disturbed at the tactics of concealment being practiced by both owners and managers
of this complex in not informing us of the DMV's move in, while at the same time soliciting our
signing of long-term leases.
Normally a new tenant would not be of concern to any of us, however, the DMV is a significant
tenant whose business dealings with the public and velficle traffic flow portend tremendous
parking and safety'issues.
We tl.~erefore l~ee,J, it in~'t~erative to combine our efforts to bring about productive Lessee/Lessor
communication as':well a~timely strategies to re~olve our concerns prior to the DMV move in.
The issues are prtmardy as follows:
1. Tenant Parking
2. Vehicle safety
3. Employee safety
Parking: Parking as it currently exists without the burden of the DMV, is marginal at best.
Between the dedicated handicapped spaces and weekly water district meetings, there have been
many tin~es that parking ',,,'as only available at the Southwest end of the 8678 parking lot. Our
employees am often inconvenienced ~s are our clients. If our cliems were to be inconvenienced
further, we feel it could adversely affect our business. There are currently only 43 parking spaces
immediately surrounding the 8632 building, not even enough to accommodate the current tenants
needs let alone our clients and the previously mentioned weekly meetings. We foresee significant
problems with traffic flow and space availability. We estimate the DMV has far more daily
employees than the previous tenant, Calvary Chapel, and that they will need parking spaces
ongoing.
~ F~b O? 02 01:23p ~RY COBB&MRRLEY 909 980 9469 p.3
Vehicle safety: Due to the diverse, often inexperienced, and often transient nature relating to the
DMV clientele, we are uncomfortable with the safety of our vehicles and office property. The
potential for vandalism to our vehicles and theft will increase.
Personal/Employee Safety: The concerns expressed above in "Vehicle Safety" also impact
Tenant/Employee safety. The risk of personal crimes to tenants/employees of the complex will
increase. Many of us work well into the eve~g hours and feel them is greater risk with the
DMV clientele.
We have discussed some potential solutions, but feel a managemenfftenant meeting is needed
quick order.
Please contact Rick Bell, CFP to coordinate the meeting. In advance, tha~ you for consider~g
our needs and ~feW and for working with'us to resolve these issues.
Sincerely, Dated: ~r~cx%,/
~" .: Ch~rle~ ~. W~L:' The W~h~ Benefits
RiCksuite Bell,200 CFP, CLU:/Rick Bell, CFP "Suite 200
Jofl~si: C~no Bas~ Watermaster e~nk
~David Guzman: Blue Diamon~nd~g' KeG[ ~rrett: ~i~e Ben~
Suite 201 S6ke 209
F~b O? 02 01:23p JRY COBB&MRRLEY 909 980 9469 ~.4
MEMO
To: All Current Tenants of 8632 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamunga
From: Jennifer Briguglio Bandy - Jay, Cobb &Marley, Suite 202
Date: February 7, 2002
RE: City Council Meeting - February 6, 2002
DMV Location
I attended last night's City Council meeting in order to make the Mayor and the City Council aware
of our concerns regarding the impending DMV move. I chose to represent the eight (8) current
tenants and indicated to the Council that the concerns brought to light were shared by us as a group.
A summary of the meeting is as folloxvs:
· Announcement of the relocation of the DMV and a request for input from citizens. All input
was positive and I therefore waited to speak last.
· Introduction of myself, name of business, location, and the seven (7) other tenants I was
there to represent.
Attitude of Rancho Tech LLC and ICO Investments which has progressed from:
1) Concealment; 2) Dismissal, and; 3) An attitude of"let's wait and see".
· Sundays's paper, dated February 3, 2002, whereby the announcement indicated a temporary
arrangement of one year or longer. To those of us whose business stands to be negatively
knpacted, one year is not acceptable, without certain provisions.
· An overview of our letter being sent to ICO Investments and Rancho Tech LLC outlining
our primary concerns as follows:
1. Tenant Parking and Traffic Flow
2. Vehicle and Personal Property Safety
3. Employee and Client Safety
· Finally, a request that the City Council assign someone to investigate our concerns and work
directly with ICO Investment and the DMV.
Overall, response by the City Council personnel was sympathetic, but one of"no guarantees". A
representative of the State argued thatthe DMV was a State-fanded organization with no restrictions
regarding the place it chooses to domicile. In addition, he argued that there appeared to be plenty
of parking and wouldn't have endorsed the move had he thought it to be a problem. Based on such
two opposing opinions, it was the Mayor's recommendation that someone from the Planning
Commission be assigned to the problem.
Duane Baker, Assistant City Manager spoke with me after the meeting and will be contacting my
office to set up a visit. I will advise everyone of the date once it is set and encourage anyone who
is available to join in our meeting.
8632 Archibald Ave * Suite 202 * Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730' (909) 980-5092 * (909) 980-9469 FAX
T H E C I T Y O F
l~AN CH 0 C U CA ~ ONGA
StaffRe rt
DATE: February 6, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Bill Makshanoff, Building and Safety Official
BY: Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor
SUBJECT: SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL
SUMMARY:
At the City Council meeting on January 16, 2002 Councilwoman Diane Williams
asked staff to report back on the abandoned shopping cart issue. Code
Enforcement had received a number of calls regarding abandoned shopping carts
that same week. The majority of carts belonged to the 99 Cents Only Store located
at 9840 Baseline Avenue.
The 99 Cents Only Store, along with twelve other retailers in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, contract with California Shopping Cart Retrieval Corporation to retrieve
their cads on a weekly basis. The 99 Cents Only Store was contacted by Code
Enforcement and at our request they have increased their retrieval pickup from once
to twice a week. In addition, the store manager advised that the store will respond
immediately to "stray" carts, when contacted by either the City of Rancho
Cucamonga or any citizen. Code Enforcement has also contacted the shopping cart
retrieval service to monitor the area more closely.
Code Enforcement will address any future shopping cart concerns by contacting the
retailers and the shopping cart retrieval service directly when "stray" carts impact
any area of the City.
BACKGROUND:
The state has a relatively new law under Business and Professions Code Sections
22435-22435.8 which deal with the identification of shopping and laundry carts and
STAFF REPORT: SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL
February 6, 2002
Page 2
their impoundment by local government. The City is permitted to impound marked
carts and must give notification to the owners to claim the carts within three days at
no charge. After the three days has expired, the City may charge a nominal fee to
defray costs. If the cart goes unclaimed after 30 days, then the cart may be
destroyed. Unmarked carts may be picked up and destroyed without delay.
California Shopping Cart Retrieval Corporation services businesses (see
attachment) in the community where they pick up and return shopping carts to the
originating business, which has a contract with them for a fee per cart or load.
Shopping carts which do not belong to these store locations are picked up and
disposed of by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Public Work's Department.
Currently, Code Enforcement contacts one of the two for shopping cart removal.
Respectfully submitted,
William N. Makshanoff
Building and Safety Official
WNM:mds
Attachment
California Shoppin.q Cart Retrieval Corp.
Store Locator for the City of Rancho Cucamonga
99 Cents Only Stores 9840 Baseline Road 91701
Albertson's Grocery 9775 Baseline Road 91730
Albertson's Grocery 11358 Kenyon Way 91737
Albertson's Grocery 8850 Foothill Boulevard 91730
Food 4 Less 12879 Foothill Boulevard 91729
Hughes Markets 7243 Haven Avenue 91701
Longs Drugs 7207 South Haven Avenue 91701
Ralph's Grocery 7369 Milliken Avenue 91730
Rite Aid Corporation 9850 Baseline Road 91730
Sav-On Drugs 11428 Kenyon Way 91730
Smart & Final Iris 8676 Baseline Road 91730
Stater Bros Grocery 8770 Baseline Road 91701
Vons Companies 6351 Haven Avenue 91737
rev/01 *23-02/mds
127'