HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-214 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 01-214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-05, A REQUEST
TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, TO ELIMINATE A
PORTION OF 7T" STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY ITS
CURRENT TERMINUS EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO
HERMOSA AVENUE
A. RECITALS.
1. Hogle/Ireland, Inc. has filed an application for Development Code
Amendment No. 00-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter
in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to
as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that day.
3. On the 19`h day of September 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that day.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on September 19, 2001, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located with the City; and
b. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set
forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes
as follows:
Resolution No. 01-214
Page 2 of 4
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and will provide for development, within the
district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with
related development; and
b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Development Code; and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the
Development Code; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for
the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated
herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows:
a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial
Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the
City Council; and further, this Council has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative
Declaration with regard to the application.
b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain
significant environmental effects that will result if the project is
approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an
acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the
project that are listed below as conditions of approval.
1) If the City Council determines, through the approval
process for said Development Code amendment, that the
elimination of this portion of 7`" Street is justified, this
developer will be required to acquire right-of-way for and
construct a cul-de-sac terminus for 7'" Street west of the
railroad spur.
Resolution No. 01-214
Page 3 of 4
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: in
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.
Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and
the information provided to the City Council during the public
hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 A) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and
4 above, this Council hereby approves Development Code Amendment No.
00-05 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19`h day of September 2001.
AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
cfL�--
William J. xander, Mayor
Resolution No. 01-214
Page 4 of 4
ATTEST:
14V��
Debra J. Adam , CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting
of said City Council held on the 1g`h day of September 2001.
Executed this 201h day of September 2001, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
I a&o��
ebra J. Adam C, City Clerk