HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-010 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. FD 02-010
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
ADOPTING A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
SYSTEM AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public
agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by
the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public
agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments
to said Law; and
WHEREAS, one of.the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the
governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to
approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a
summary of the change proposed in said contract; and
WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change:
To provide Section 21354.4 (2.5% @ 55 Full Formula) for local
miscellaneous members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District that said Board does hereby give notice of intention to approve
an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of
Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said
amendment being attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a
part hereof.
Al.see Re fatlamngpage
for formal adoption,certification and signatures
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 2 of 29
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 201h day of June 2002.
AYES: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
William J. exander, President
ATTEST:
'41,
Debra J. Adams ecretary
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by
the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a
Special Meeting of said Board held on the 201h day of June 2002.
Executed this 24`h day of June 2002 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
A �/()
KL/
De&a J. Adam ecretary
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 3 of 29
Ca1PERS
EXHIBIT
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
Board of Directors
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
400.
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective
February 15, 1975, and witnessed February 12, 1975, and as amended effective June
16, 1979, May 26, 1990, November 21, 1991, November 16, 1995, June 1, 1996,
November 21, 1996 and November 2, 2000 which provides for participation of Public
Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows:
A. Paragraphs 1 through 12 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed
effective November 2, 2000, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs
numbered 1 through 12 inclusive:
1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall
mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety
members.
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 4 of 29 f
1
PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ON"
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after February 15, 1975 making its employees as
hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of
the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on
election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all
amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by
express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting
agency.
3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members);
b. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become
members of said Retirement System:
a. POLICE OFFICERS.
5. This contract shall be a continuation of the benefits of the contract of the
Alto Loma Fire District and the Cucamonga Fire Protection District,
hereinafter referred to as "Former Agency", pursuant to Section 20567.2
of the Government Code, Former Agency having ceased to exist and
having been required by law to be succeeded by Public Agency on
February 15, 1975. Public Agency, by this contract, assumes the
accumulated contributions and assets derived therefrom and liability for
prior and current service under Former Agency's contract with respect to
the Former Agency's employees. Legislation repealed said Section
effective January 1, 1988.
6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall
be determined in accordance with Section 21354.4 of said Retirement Law
(2.5% at age 55 Full).
[Note that a future legislative proposal is being considered which
could amend Government Code Section 21354.4 to make the 2.5% at
55 benefit formula applicable to both active members and inactive
members who have not yet retired. If enacted, this amendment could
have an effect on your agency's actuarial valuation and employer
contribution rates in future years.]
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 5 of 29
SE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY"
7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be
determined in accordance with Section 21362.2 of said Retirement Law
(3% at age 50 Full).
8. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits).
b. Section 20965 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave) for local safety
members only.
C. Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation).
d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes
of 1976.
9. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said
Retirement System.
10. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local miscellaneous members and local safety members.
b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of
administering said System as it affects the employees of Public
Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the
periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 6 of 29
Y
12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid
by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the
end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed
by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of
contributions is paidfor any period, proper adjustment shall be made in
connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of
errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct
payments between the employee and the Board.
B. This amendment shall be effective on the day of
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION -BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSKU '"RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE
� PROTECTION DISTRICT
r
BY U BY
KENNETH W. MARZION, C%kfl PRESIDING OFFICER
YS
ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYE DIVISION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE TIREMENT SYSTEM
Witness D�t�
Att
Clerk
AMENDMENT
PERS-CON-702A(Rev.8\96)
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 7 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:NNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIS'T'RICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description:Section 21354.4,2.5%Q 55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
New CalPERS' Board Resolution Concerning Value of Assets
On June 20,2001,the CalPERS'Board adopted a new resolution concerning the value of assets to be
used in determining the employer contribution rate due to benefit increases for amendments to public
agency contracts. This new resolution applies to all contract amendments based upon the June 30,2000
annual actuarial valuation and for which a Resolution of Intention to amend is filed with CalPERS by
June 30,2002.
This new resolution provides an increase in the actuarial value of assets in the amount of two times the
increase in the Present Value of Benefits. Under the new resolution,the employer has the option of
taking no increase in the actuarial value of assets and allowing the regular asset smoothing method to
operate as it normally would. In addition,the employer may limit the actuarial value of assets used for
rate setting purposes to 100%of market value if normal application of the resolution would otherwise
exceed this limit. Under no circumstances will an actuarial value of assets in excess of 1 10%of market
value be utilized. Further,the new resolution will apply to agencies whether or not they utilized the 95%
asset value offered in the previous resolution.
The available rate choices are offered under three different Alternatives:
• Alternative 1—No increase in Actuarial Value of Assets
• Alternative 2—Actuarial Value of Assets increased by twice the increase in the Present Value of
Benefits due to the amendment,limited to 1000%of Market Value of Assets
• Alternative 3—Actuarial Value of Assets increased by twice the increase in the Present Value of
Benefits due to the amendment,limited to 1100%of Market Value of Assets
The employer should carefully consider its choices in choosing its new rate under the options made
available by the new resolution. The recent stock market volatility and the choices created under this
new board resolution can complicate your plan's future financial position. For many plans at CalPERS,
the financial soundness of the plan will not be jeopardized regardless of the choice made by the employer.
However,it is possible that,for some plans,some choices under the resolution would represent poor
financial decisions. You are strongly encouraged to have in-depth discussions with your CaIPERS
actuary about the financial consequences of any amendment.
Present Value of Projected Benefits
The table below shows the change in the total present value of benefits for the proposed plan amendment.
The present value of benefits represents the total dollars needed today to fund all future benefits for
current members of the plan,i.e.without regard to future employees. The difference between this amount
and current plan assets must be paid by future employee and employer contributions. As such,the change
in the present value of benefits due to the plan amendment represents the"cost"of the plan amendment.
However,for plans with excess assets some or all of this"cost"may already be covered by current excess
assets.
In this analysis,the increase in the present value of benefits due to the amendment is$236,831. Two
times this increase is$473,662,or 21.2%of market value of assets. Therefore,under alternative 2,the
actuarial value of assets will be increased to 100.0%of the market value of assets. Under alternative 3,
the actuarial value of assets will be increased to 110.0%of the market value of assets.
May 14,2002 Page 1 of?
7:51 AM
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 8 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:JUNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description: Section 21354.4,2.5%®55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
As of June 30,2000 Current Plan Post-Amendment Post-Amendment Post-Amendment
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Total Assets at Market Value E 2,229,533 S 2,229,533 E 2,229,533 E 2,229,533
(MVA)
Actuarial Value of Assets(AVA) 2,121,791 2,121,791 2,229,533 2,452,486
Increase in AVA 0 107,742 330,695
AVA I MVA 95.2% 95.2% 100.0°/. 110.0%
Present Value of Projected E 2,096,709 S 2,333,540 E 2,333,540 E 2,333,540
Benefits(PVB)
Actuarial Value of Assets(AVA) 2.121.791 212. 1.79122. 29533 2.452.486
Present Value of Future Employer
and Employee Contributions S (25,082) E 211,749 E 104,007 E (118,946)
(PVB—AVA)
Change to PVB 236,831 236,831 236,831
Accrued Liability
It is not required,nor necessarily desirable,to have accumulated assets sufficient to cover the total present
value of benefits until every member has left employment. Instead,the actuarial funding process
calculates a regular contribution schedule of employee contributions and employer contributions(called
normal costs)which are designed to accumulate with interest to equal the total present value of benefits
by the time every member has left employment. As of each June 30,the actuary calculates the
"desirable"level of plan assets as of that point in time by subtracting the present value of scheduled future
employee contributions and future employer normal costs from the total present value of benefits. The
resulting"desirable"level of assets is called the accrued liability.
A plan with assets exactly equal to the plan's accrued liability is simply"on schedule"in funding that
plan,and only future employee contributions and future employer normal costs are needed. A plan with
assets below the accrued liability is"behind schedule",or is said to have an unfunded liability,and must
temporarily increase contributions to get back on schedule. A plan with assets in excess of the plan's
accrued liability is"ahead of schedule",or is said to have excess assets,and can temporarily reduce future
contributions. A plan with assets in excess of the total present value of benefits is called super funded,
and neither future employer nm employee contributions are required. Of course,events such as plan
amendments and investment or demographic gains or losses can change a plan's condition from year to
year. For example,a plan amendment could cause a plan to move all the way from being super-funded to
being in an unfunded position.
The changes in your plan's accrued liability,unfunded accrued liability,and the funded ratio as of June
30,2000 due to the plan amendment are shown in the table below.
May 14,2002 Page 2 of 7
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 9 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:JUNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description:Section 21354.4,2.5%Qa 55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
As of June 30,2000 Current Plan Post-Amendment Post-Amendment Post-Amendment
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Entry Age Normal Accrued f 1,458,501 $ 1,614,816 S 1,614,816 S 1,614,816
Liability(AL)
Actuarial Value of Assets(AVA) 2.121.791 2,121,791 2 22. 9.533 1452A86
Unfunded Liability/(Excess S (663,290) $ (506,975) S (614,717) S (837,670)
Assets)(UAL-AL—AVA)
Funded Ratio(AVA/AL) 145.5% 131.4% 138.1% 151.9%
Change to AL 156,315 156,315 156,315
Change to UAL 156,315 48,573 (174,380)
Total Employer Contribution Rate
While the tables above give the changes in the"cost"and funded status of the plan due to the amendment,
there remains the question of what will happen to the employer contribution rate because of the change in
plan provisions.
Ca1PERS policy is to implement rate changes due to plan amendments immediately on the effective date
of the change in plan benefits. In general,the policy also provides that the change in unfunded liability
due to the plan amendment will be separately amortized over a period of 20 years from the effective date
of the amendment and all other components of the plan's unfunded liability/excess assets will continue to
be amortized separately.
However,your actuary may choose to apply different rules to plans with a current employer contribution
rate of zero. The pre-amendment excess assets in these plans were sufficient to cover the employer's
normal cost for one or more years into the future. A plan amendment will use up some or all of the pre-
amendment excess assets. In order to maintain our goal of providing rates that are relatively stable,while
taking into account known or expected future events,your actuary may decide to spread any remaining
excess assets over a single number of years. This is known as a"fresh start"and will generally be for a
period not less than 10 years. If the amendment uses up all excess assets and creates an unfunded liability
(i.e.from being ahead of schedule to behind schedule),the total post-amendment unfunded liability may
be amortized over 20 years.
In no case may the annual contribution with regard to a positive unfunded liability be less than the amount
which would be required to amortize that unfunded liability,as a level percent of pay,over 30 years.
One aspect of the Board's June 20,2001 Resolution is that,generally,if an agency elects an alternative
which increases the actuarial value of assets(alternative 2 or 3),the result will be a lower short-term
contribution and a higher longer-term contribution. To illustrate this we have estimated what the impact
might be when the June 30,2001 valuation is prepared. Please be aware this estimate assumes there are
no changes to actuarial assumptions or methods, there are no actuarial gains or losses,and there are no
plan changes such as work force changes and employer paid member contributions converted to pay.
However,we have taken into account CalPERS'June 30,2001 year-end market value rate of return,
-7.2%. The actual employer rate from July 1,2003 to June 30,2004 will be set by the June 30,2001
annual valuation and will likely deviate from this estimate.
May 14,2002 Page 3 of 7
7:51 AM
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 10 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:JUNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description:Section 21354.4,2-5%@ 55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
The table below shows the change in your plan's employer contribution rate due to the plan amendment.
As of June 30,2000 Current Plan Post-Amendment Post-Amendment Post-Amendment
Alternative I Alternative 2 Alternative 3
2002-2003
Payment for Normal Cost 7.973% 9.447% 9.4471/6 9.447%
Paymeat on Amortization Bases -7.973% -9.447% -9.447% -9.447%
Payment for 1939 Survivor 0.000% 0.000'/. 0.1100% 0.000%
Benefit Program
Total Employer Rate 0.000% 0.000% 0.000°/1 0.000%
Change to Normal Cost 1.474% 1.474% 1.474%
Change to Total Employer Rate 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%
Current Amortization Baser 25-year
Amendment Amortization Base
-Fresh Start' 12-yew 16-year 29-year
-Multiple Base 3 N/A N/A N/A
2003-2004
Estimated Employer Rate 4 0.0%, 1.8% 2.9% 3.7%
(recognizing-7.2%investment
return for 2000.2001)
Projection Amortization Base 19-yew Multiple Base Multiple Base 20-year
1-Details of the currmt amortization time are stow on page 7 of June 30,2000 annual valuation report. If yeti have adopted my other
subsequent amendments,the current amortization hate is the schedule after these adopted amendments.
2- If a fixed number of years is shown,it neaps that the current unfunded actuarial liability is projected and amortized over this fixed nu ribs of
yeas. This amortization replaces the amortization schedule shown in your June 30,2000 armual valuation and any other subsequent
amendments you have adopted.
3- If 20-year is shown,it mems that changes in Iiatility due to plan amendments and changes in actuarial value of assets are anantiaed
separately over a 20-year period. This amortization schedule is in addition to the amortization schedule shown in the June 30,2000 arcual
valuation and any other subsequent amendments you have adopted.
4- Excludes 1959 Survivor Benefit Program rate.
In the above table,the information shown in the 2002-2003 box represents the actual initial contribution
rate that will apply during fiscal 2002-2003 if you adopt the amendment by June 30,2002. However,
these figures do not incorporate the-7.2%investment return in 2000-2001. The estimated employer rates
shown in the 2003-2004 box do take the negative return into consideration and will give you a better
estimate of what to expect in 2003-2004.
Note that the change in normal cost in the table above may be much more indicative of the long term
change in the employer contribution rate due to the plan amendment. The plan's unfunded
liability/excess asset cost shown in the table above is a temporary adjustment to the employer contribution
to"get the plan back on schedule". This temporary adjustment to the employer rate varies in duration
from plan to plan. For example,a plan with initial excess assets being amortized over a short period of
time will typically experience a large rate increase when excess assets are fully amortized. While a plan
amendment for such a plan may produce little or no increase in the employer contribution rate now,the
change in normal cost due to the plan amendment will become fully reflected in the employer
contribution rate as soon as initial excess assets are fully amortized.
May 14,2002 Page 4 of 7
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 11 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:JUNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description: Section 21354.4,2.5%®55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
Disclosure
If your agency is requesting cost information for two or more benefit changes,the cost of adopting more
than one of these changes may not be obtained by adding the individual costs. Instead,a separate
valuation must be done to provide a cost analysis for the combination of benefit changes. If the proposed
plan amendment applies to only some of the employees in the plan,the rate change due to the plan
amendment still applies to the entire plan,and is still based on the total plan payroll.
Any mandated benefit improvements not included in the June 30,2000 annual valuation(such as the
change to the 90%cap for safety plans)have not been incorporated into this cost analysis.
Please note that the cost analysis provided in this document may not be relied upon once the CalPERS
actuarial staff have completed the next annual valuation,that is,the annual valuation as of June 30,2001.
If you have not taken action to amend your contract,and we have already mailed the June 30,2001
annual valuation report,you must contact our office for an updated cost analysis,based on the new annual
valuation.
Descriptions of the actuarial methodologies,actuarial assumptions,and plan benefit provisions may be -
found in the appendices of the June 30,2000 annual report. Please note that the results shown here are
subject to change if any of the data or plan provisions change from what was used in this study.
Certification
This actuarial valuation for the proposed plan amendment is based on the participant,benefits,and asset
data used in the June 30,2000 annual valuation,with the benefits modified if necessary to reflect what is
currently provided under your contract with CAPERS,and further modified to reflect the proposed plan
amendment. The valuation has been performed in accordance with standards of practice prescribed by the
Actuarial Standards Board,and the assumptions and methods are internally consistent and reasonable for
this plan,as prescribed by the CAPERS Board of Administration according to provisions set forth in the
California Public Employees'Retirement Law. The valuation has been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted actuarial practice except that,under a CaIPERS Board resolution,an increased
actuarial value of assets may be substituted for the actuarial value of assets that would have been
produced by the current and generally accepted actuarial asset smoothing method described in the annual
report. If your agency elects not to increase the actuarial value of assets permitted by the Board
resolution,then no exception exists.
Gale D.Patrick,F.S.A.,M,A.A.A.
Enrolled Actuary
Senior Pension Actuary,CaIPERS
Fin Process Ids: Annual-67599 Base-94105 Ahl-94106 Alt2-94107 A10-94108
May 14,2002 Page 5 of 7
7:51 AM
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 12 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:JUNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description:Section 21354.4,2.5%Qa 55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
Summary of Plan Amendments Valued
COVERAGE GROUP 70001
Pre-Amendment
• The Service Retirement benefit calculated for service earned by this group of members is a
monthly allowance equal to the product of the 2% a@ 55 benefit factor,years of service,and
final compensation. (Final compensation is reduced by$133.33 per month for members with
a modified formula). The benefit factors for retirement at integral ages are shown below:
Retirement 2%at 55 Retirement 2%at 55
Ae Factor Ace Factor
50 1.426% 57 2.104%
51 1.522% 58 2.156%
52 1.628% 59 2.210%
53 1.742% 60 2.262%
54 1.866% 61 2.314%
55 2.000% 62 2.366%
56 2.052% 63 and older 2.418%
• This group of members is required to contribute 7%of reportable earnings. (Members with a
modified formula contribute 7%of reportable earnings in excess of$133.33 per month).
Post-Amendment
• The Service Retirement benefit calculated for service earned by this group of members
(including all non-retired members)is a monthly allowance equal to the product of the 2.5%
Q 55 benefit factor,years of service,and final compensation. (Final compensation is
reduced by$133.33 per month for members with a modified formula). The benefit factors for
retirement at integral ages are shown below:
Retirement 2.5%at 55
Ace Factor
50 2.000%
51 2.100%
52 2.200%
53 2.300%
54 2.400%
55 and older 2.500
• This group of members is required to contribute 8%of reportable earnings. (Members with a
modified formula contribute 8%of reportable earnings in excess of$133.33 per month).
May 14,2002 Page 6 of 7
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 13 of 29
CONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS-VALUATION BASIS:JUNE 30,2000
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
EMPLOYER NUMBER 1041
Benefit Description:Section 21354.4,2.5%Q 55 Full Formula
(Includes All Non-Retired Local Miscellaneous Members)
Probability of Retirement for New Miscellaneous Benefit Formulas
The introduction of the three new miscellaneous formulas will affect future retirement behavior. As a
result,we developed 3 sets of probability of retirements to reflect the estimated changes in retirement
pattern. At this point,we cannot know the exact impact the new formulas will have. As we perform
experience studies in the future,we will modify our retirement assumptions accordingly. The table below
contains the new probability of retirement.
2.5% 55 2.7%tU 55 3% 60
Retirement A e Male Female Male Female Male Female
50 5% 7% 5% 7% 5% 1 7% _
51 2% 5% 2% 5% 2% 1 5%
52 3% 5% 3% 5% 3% 1 5%
53 3% 5% 3% 6% 3% 5%
54 4% 5% 4% 6% 4% 1 5%
55 8% 9% 9% 10% 8% 1 9%
56 6% 7% 7% 8% 7% 1 8%
57 7% 6% 8% 7% 8% 1 7%
58 8% 10% 8% 10% 9% 1 11%
59 9% 9% 10% 9% 11% 1 10%
60 16% 12% 17% 13% 19% 1 15%
61 15% 10% 16% 11% 17% 1 12%
62 26% 21% 28% 23% 31% 1 25%
63 22% 18% 23% 20% 26% 1 22%
64 15% 13% 16% 14% 18% 16%
65 25% 25% 27% 27% 30% 30%
66 14% 15% 15% 16% 17% 18%
67 12% 14% 13% 16% 14% 17%
68 12a/o 11ah 13% 129/6 15% 13%
gg 9% 13% 10% 14% 11% 15%
70 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
May 14,2002 Page 7 of 7
7:51 AM
Resolution No. FD 02-010
Page 14 of 29
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES
SUMMARY OF ACTUARIAL VALUATION
PROVIDED BY
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
JUNE 20,2002
• Change in Present Value of Benefits $236,831
at Increase in Actuarial Value of Assets $ -0-
• Change in Unfunded Accrued Liability $156,315
at Change in the Total Employer Rate 0.000%
summary of Actuarial Valuation-Fire
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN
Actuarial Study
JOHN E. BARTEL, Aon Consulting
C
CD
N
0
c
May 30, 2002 0
� z
0 0
� T
N 0
(n O
O N
N 0
100
ti
AGENDA
Topic page
Benefit Summary 1
Actuarial Assumptions 3
Actuarial Methods 7
Demographic Information 9
Valuation Results 11
CDC
0
0
0
c_
0
v Z
0 0
cr T
0
� o
o ,
oMimtkity of ancho aamongaVarsll-1-02 vkmWts mitt 02-05-300na1.daa 10 0
BENEFIT SUMMARY
■ Eligibility ■ Miscellaneous employees
■ Retire directly from the Ci - Age 56 with 10 years service
■ Benefit ■ Executive Management and City Council - Including car allowance in
pensionable earnings
■ 3% @ 60 @ 10 years service, offset by 2.5% @ 55 benefit using same
service
Net Benefits for 3% @ 60
Age 3%@60 2.5%@55 Net
56 2.600 2.500 0.100
57 2.700 2.500 0.200
58 2.800 2.500 0.300
59 2.900 2.500 0.400
60+ 3.000 2.500 0.500
CDC
0
H
0
D
00
J
Aom0 O
1 r� O
100
°D
°
BENEFIT SUMMARY 0 °
o �
NZ
,p O
■ Cost of Living Increases ■ Benefits adjusted same as Ca1PERS (2% COLA) o
N
■ Death Benefit ■ None b
0
■ Disability Benefit ■ None, unless eligible to service retire
Am
2
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
Assumption Supplemental Plan
■ Interest rate: 7.5%
+1.0%
■ Salary increases:
• Individual Service Ann. Incr.
0- 2 14.20%
3- 7 6.36
8-29 4.80
30+ 3.75
• Aggregate payroll 3.75%
■ General inflation 3.50%
0
N
C_
O
7
Z
p O
(Q T
.p O
AoNt O
O
3 N
�o 0
� cD
� 0
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
o
N Z
.O O
Assumption CAPERS Supplemental Plan �
■ Service retirement (3% @ 60) Age Rate Age Rate Age Rate Age Rate
50 5% 61 17% 50 0 % 61 17% o
51 2 62 31 51 0 62 31
52 3 63 26 52 0 63 26
53 3 64 18 53 0 64 18
54 4 65 30 54 0 65 .30
55 8 66 17 55 0 66 17
56 7 67 14 56 32 67 14
57 8 68 15 57 8 68 15
58 9 69 11 58 9 69 11
59 11 70 100 59 11 70 100
60 19 60 19
Average retirement age Average retirement age
59.6 60.1
AOA
4
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
Assumption CAPERS Supplemental Plan
■ Termination (including with and First 5 Year Same
without refund and disability) Svc Rate Svc Rate
0-1 6.4% 3-4 6.30/1
1-211.5 4-5 5.1
2-3 7.9
After 5 Years
Age Rate Age Rate
20 6.0% 45 0.80/
25 3.9 50 0.7
30 2.5 55 0.6
35 1.6 60 0.6
40 1.1_
■ Mortality rates CalPERS' 1988-1992 Same
Experience Stud A
N
O
m
mtQ
n
Z
p O
D T
N
AoNp
S O N
5 "' O
N8
10 O
o �
� Q
N �
PRESENT VALUE OF BENEFITS N °
o �
(ACTUARIAL LIABILITY) No 0
T
O
N
_O
O
Future Normal
Costs
Current .
Normal Cost
AM
6
ACTUARIAL METHODS
■ PVB - Projected Value of all Benefits:
• Discounted value, at measurement (valuation date — 1/1/02), of all future expected
benefit payments
• Expected benefit payments based on various (actuarial) assumptions
■ AL — Actuarial Liability:
• Discounted value, at measurement (valuation date — 1/1/02), of benefits earned
through measurement
► Service @ measurement
► Salary, inflation, etc. projected same as PVB calculation
• Portion of PVB "earned" at measurement
■ Normal Cost:
Discounted value, at measurement (valuation date — 1/1/02), of benefits earned
during coming year
► Service during year CD
► Salary, inflation, etc. projected same as PVPB calculation
• Portion of PVPB "earned" during year
fl
o
CCD
T
N
Aom W O
1
o
N -+
O O
_ fl �
N
ACTUARIAL METHODS A
o �
N Z
.p O
T
Q
Method Comments
0
■ Cost Method ■ Entry Age Normal o
■ Acceptable under GASB 27
■ Same as Ca1PERS
■ Annual Required ■ 20 & 30 year amortization of unfunded actuarial liability
Contribution ■ Level percentage of pay
■ Acceptable under GASB 27
■ Same as Ca1PERS
g
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
MISC CCL FPD Total
■ Actives 320 5 14 339
■ Average:
• Age 42.7 55.6 42.5 42.9
• Service 8.9 7.1 7.1 8.8
• Pay 49,982 15,798 49,000 49,437
■ Aggregate Payroll 15,994,000 79,000 686,000 16,759,000
N
0
� z
0 0
� T
Am
N �
N
(n O
1 O
9 No
100
0 (
o (D
co
Co
N I
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 0
o =
NZ
.p 9
T
Service 0
0
Age 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25.29 30-34 Total
1544 Count 13 13 O
Average S 33,632 33,632 0
25-29 Count 26 2 28
Average Salary 37,362 37.680 37,384
30-34 Count 24 6 4 34
Average Salary 42,728 39,004 42,792 42,078
35-39 Count 29 9 19 2 54
Average Salary47,948 43,477 48,210 61,464 47,796
40-44 Count 18 9 26 9 1 63
Average Salary 44,034 38,027 52,407 63,805 32,772 49,277
45-49 Count 19 11 17 7 4 1 59
Average Salary 50,593 48,622 48,728 71,710 53,568 59,328 52,543
50-54 Count 7 3 16 10 11 47
Average Salary 37,346 93.444 53,271 62,639 71,9051 59,818
55-59 Count 4 4 17 5 2 32
Average Salary 72,678 57,765 52,6921 56,710 69,624 57,510
60-64 Count 4 2 1 7
Average Salary 38,413 46,464 92,496 48,440
65-69 Count 1 1 2
Average Salary 15,438 52,896 34,167
70+ Conn
Average Salary
Total count 136 44 104 35 19 1 339
Average Salary 43,429 47,4811 50,315 62,915 66,829 59,328 49,437
AmV
10
VALUATION RESULTS
■ Present Value of Benefits $7,737,000
■ Actuarial Liability 4,663,000
■ $ Contribution
(20-year amortization)
• Normal Cost $ 315,000
• Amortization 320.000
• Total 635,000
■ Contribution Rate
(20-year amortization)
• Normal Cost 1.9%
• Amortization 1.9
• Total 3.8
0
N
0_
C_
O
Z
Q
CD
C T
AoNV �
N
O O
Y
A
0 N
N C
co
VALUATION RESULTS
a �
NZ
10 .0
■ $ Contribution o
(30-year amortization) o
• Normal Cost $ 315,000 0
• Amortization 248.000
• Total 563,000
■ Contribution Rate
(30-year amortization)
• Normal Cost 1.9%
• Amortization 1.5
• Total 3.4
■ Interest Rate Sensitivity
(20-year amortization)
• +1.0% (0.5)%
•
- 1.0% 0.7
A
12
ACTUARIAL CERTIFICATION
We prepared a June 30, 2002 actuarial study for the City of Rancho Cucamonga PARS
Retirement Enhancement Plan. The employee data and financial information used in this
study were not audited by us. On the basis of our review of the data, we believe that the
information is sufficiently complete and reliable, and that it is appropriate for the purposes
intended.
In my opinion, each assumption used in this valuation is reasonable taking into account the
Plan's experience. The methods employed in this valuation are consistent with generally
accepted actuarial principles and practices.
Therefore, the information as presented in this Study fully and fairly discloses the actuarial
position of the Plan.
f . &%zAE4
John E. Bartel, ASA, MAAA, EA
N
Vice President °
� z
00
CD T
N Q
'00
AoN 0
13 4 o
C