HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/09/18 - Agenda Packet OITYOF
RAN ONGA
1050,0 C~)~c ¢~e~D'nve:
Rancho Cucamonga, GA 91730
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
~? REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
~:~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
~ CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
SEPTEMBER 18, 2002
ARency, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander .................... Mayor
Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ............................... Member
Grace Curatalo ........ , ................ Member
Bob Dutton .............................. Member
Jack Lam ......................... City Manager
James L. Markman ............. City Attorney
Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room
7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers
Regular Fire Protection District Meeting... Council Chambers
Regular City Council Meeting ...................... Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2002
1
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Offic6 receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane
Curatalo Dutton , and Williams__
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Proclamations in recognition of the "Patriot Day" Cross-
Country Bike Tour Volunteers.
2. Presentation of Proclamations to three Little League Divisions for
winning the District 21 Championships.
C.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
1. Presentation by Katie Hill and Megan Daniels on their Silver Award 1
Bridge Project for a local park.
D....~. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: August 21,2002
2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. August 29 through September 5, 2
2002, and Payroll ending August 15 and August 29, 2002, for the total
amount of $2,013.500.99.
3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 10
31,2002.
4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the
Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to 16
1600' easterly, to be funded from Assessment District 84-1, Account
No. 16023035650/1414602-0.
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2002
2
RESOLUTION NO. 02-247 ~ 8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS FROM ETIWANDA AVENUE
TO 1600' EASTERLY" IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 2;~
Playground Sand Replacement at Various City parks, funded from
Account Nos.1120305-5650/1305120-0 ($70,000), 1120305-
5650/1306120-0 ($20,500) AND 1120305-5650/1307120-0 ($13,000).
RESOLUTION NO. 02-248 24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLAYGROUND SAND
REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE
BIDS
6. Approval to Appropriate $64,121.00 awarded by the United States 28
Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program.
7. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the City Clerk to accept the
Quitclaim Deed executed by Pervaiz and Nusrat Khan for the Etiwanda 30
Storm Drain, located south of Highland Avenue, east of East Avenue
from south of Highland Avenue to the Victoria Basin, funded from Acct.
No. 11143035650/1403114-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-249 33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
CLERK TO ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED
EXECUTED BY PERVAIZ AND NUSRAT KHAN
8. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho 34
Cucamonga, California, adopting the Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program for Fiscal Years 2002/03 through 2006~07 and Twenty-Year
Transportation Plan beginning in Fiscal Year 2002/03 as required for
Measure "1" funds.
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2002
3
RESOLUTION NO. 02-250 36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIvE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
FISCAL YEARS 2002/03 THROUGH 2006107
AND ']NVENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2002/03
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "1"
FUNDS
9. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the General City Area
42
Master Plan for FY 2001/2002 and appropriate $151,985 for Fund
1112-303-5650/1026112-0.
10. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the Etiwanda Area Master 43
Plan for FY 2001/2002 and appropriate $333,983 for Fund 1116-303-
565011026116-0.
11. Approval of Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District 44
No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for
DRC2001-00675, located at 12167 Arrow Route (old Ampac site),
submitted by Copart, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-251 46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00675
12. Approval to authorize the sole source purchase of radio equipment from 54
Motorola, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $31,300, from Acct. No.
1712001-5603, from a piggyback opportunity on the County of San
Bernardino's Contract No. 89-639.
13. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and 56
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2001-00423,
located on the west side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street,
submitted by Master Development Corporation.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-252 59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2001-00423
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2002
4
RESOLUTION NO. 02-253 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00423
14. Approval of an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security for 67
CUPAN129-97 (City of Ontario CUP), location on the east side of
Etiwanda Avenue north of the 1-10 freeway in the City on Ontario,
submitted by CCG Ontario, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-254 69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP/W129-97 (CITY OF
ONTARIO CUP)
15. Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (CO 02-099) with the Alta 70
Loma, Central, Cucamonga and Etiwanda School Districts and the San
Bernardino County Sheriff's Department to provide the D.A.R.E.
Program.
16. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the contract for the 71
construction of the Adult Sports Park and Parking Lot Improvements to
International Pavement Solutions, Inc. (CO 02-100) in the amount of
$176,412.00 ($160,374.50 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from
Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1209-120-0.
17. Approval and authorization of Invensys Building Systems, Inc., as the 72
single source service provider and installer for HVAC and related
energy management systems for City facilities; approval of the annual
maintenance agreement for $129,936 to include capital maintenance
projects, and approval of extra work not to exceed $100,000.
Maintenance contract to be funded from 1001312-5304 and 1700201-
5304; HVAC System installations to be funded from 1025001-5602,
5304; and extra work to be funded from various city accounts.
18. Approval of single source vendor selection and award a contract for the 75
purchase of server disk drives and related components from Pioneer-
Standard Electronics (CO 02-1Of) in the amount not to exceed
$117,064.00 from Acct. No. 1001714-5605.
19. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance 80
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 99-54,
submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., located on the south side
of Sixth Street between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue.
City Council Agenda
,September 18, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 02-255 82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-54 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 8:3
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for
improvements for Tract 15911, submitted by Ryland Homes, located on
the east side of East Avenue, south of Victoria.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-256 85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15911 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
21. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, No. FS1316412, 86
in the amount of $13,439.13, for the Arrow Route Cross Gutter Removal
and Drainage Improvements and Hellman Avenue Drainage
Improvements, Contract No. 01-028.
22. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, No. 847063P-1, 88
in the amount of $10,452.88, for the Almond Trail Drainage
Improvements from Beryl Street to 1400 feet west, Contract No. 01-047.
23. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 90
Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Coyote Canyon Park
Landscape Improvements.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-257 9'1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR COYOTE CANYON
PARK LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
CQMPLETIQN FOR THE WORK
24. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance 92
Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for
improvements for Tract 15963, submitted by Crestwood Development,
located on the northwest corner of London Avenue and Liberty Street.
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2002
6
RESOLUTION NO. 02-258 94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15963 AND
AUTHORIZtNG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
G~ PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H.~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. REPORT ON '~ASK A LIBRARIAN--24/7" (Oral)
2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S 95
PARTICIPATION IN A COALITION REPRESENTING LOCAL
GOVERNMENT INTERESTS IN THE MATTER OF ADELPHIA
COMMUNICATIONS' CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2002
7
RESOLUTION NO. 02-259 98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE
FORMATION OF A COALITION OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES TO PROTECT
THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND ITS
RESIDENTS DURING THE CHAPTER 11
BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING
ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION
3. REPORT ON VICTORIAWINDROWS POPLAR TREES '~0'~
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 132
UPDATE
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on September 12, 2002, seventy two (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive.
August 21, 2002
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meetinq
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 21, 2002, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; Pamela Easter, Deputy
City Manager; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Kristy Kelley, Recreation Coordinator; Joe O'Neil,
City Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer; Maria Perez, Assistant
Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner;
Brent LeCount, Associate Planner; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Dawn Haddon,
Purchasing Manager; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy, Information Systems
Specialist; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Dan Walters, Crime Analyst; Kimberly Thomas,
Management Analyst II; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; Shirr'l
Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's office.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the members of the volunteers from the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Rancho Cucamonga and Upland Stakes for their assistance with the
Lemon Avenue Parkway Improvement Project.
Mayor Alexander presented the certificates to Charles Rich, Rancho Cucamonga Stake President; Larry
Burke, Upland Stake Bishop; and Paul Wagner, Rancho Cucamonga Stake Assistant Wagon Master. A
brief slide presentation followed.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. John Lyons commented on the upcoming election with respect to candidates. He congratulated
Mayor Alexander for running unopposed, which is recognition by the public that he is doing an
outstanding job.
C2. Cheryl Donahue, PlO for SANBAG (San Bernardino Associated Governments) issued an invitation
to the Route 210 Freeway Grand Opening "Come Play on the Freeway," to consist of a Fun
Run/VValk/Ride on Saturday, September 28, 2002, 7 am to 1 pm.
C3. Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton St., commented regarding the Iow-income housing issue--Advertised
Public Hearing Item F.4. He commented regarding the accusations/allegations in the paper that this is a
racial issue. He commented that the residents of the neighborhood are not racists. He said in his
neighborhood is a United Nations. The common bond is that they bought houses in a safe neighborhood,
they like peace and they like nice schools.
City Council Minutes
August 21,2002
Page 2
C4. Robed Reddington, 9640 Effen St., commented regarding the Iow-income housing issuo
Advertised Public Hearing Item F4. He said the residents have the best school in the area and they
want to keep it that way.
C5. Steven Wright, 9300 Tryon, commented regarding the Iow-income housing issue---Advertised
Public Hearing Item F4.
Mayor Alexander asked that the City Planner make a statement of understanding so that everybody in
the audience knows where we're coming from regarding this issue.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that there is a zone change item on the agenda and that zone change
action before the Council is a matter of compliance with the General Plan. The General Plan has
designated the area between Hellman and Archibald, San Bernardino and Foothill as Mixed Use. He
said there is a portion of those properties, roughly 10 acres, which includes the properties of the
previous Shell Station, Vineyard Bank, the Water District, Archibald Flowers and properties that abut
Archibald as well as Foothill. He said regarding those properties, it is the position of the City Council
and the Planning Commission that the entire block be designated as Mixed Use. He said that was
done under the General Plan. He said tonight's action before the City Council is the zoning
compliance with that General Plan action last October. He said the issue of a housing project is not on
the agenda tonight for Council action.
Jack Lam, City Manager, said he believes the topic of concern is about a developer who is interested
in a multi-family project. He said that individual also indicated an interest that perhaps a portion of that
will be affordable. The City then advised the developer, which is not a requirement of the City, to share
that concept with the surrounding neighborhood. He said it is always the history of the City to have
developers share those ideas so that any concerns/interests by the neighborhood could be
incorporated into however that project may or may not develop. He said at this point there is no
application for a project; the person may come in with a project, or may not. He said at this point, we
do not have a project in which the Council or Planning Commission can act on.
Mayor Alexander asked that if there was no zone change, would it be allowed to build multi-family
housing in that area.
Brad Buller, City Planner, answered affirmatively.
Mayor Alexander stated the zone change is not what is going to trigger someone going in to do, or not
do that. He said right now it could be done, with the exception of an area occupied by CCWD and that
could not be "Residential" under the current zoning.
Steven Wright, said it is City funds that is going to pay for this and the Council will have to vote it in or
not. He said if you don't match funds with the developer, then he is going to see that he is not
financially able to do it. That is part of a State law that now requires all cities to build a so-called "low-
income" development; however, it doesn't have to be for Iow-income families; it can be done for elderly
as well, which he said he is in favor of. He said if this development goes through, he expects to lose
quite a bit of money on his property, not to mention how much money it will cost to build fences, put
bars on windows and to replace stolen property. He said when this development goes in, we'll be
seeing the helicopters flying over every night. He commented the other issues are regarding over-
crowded schools and additional traffic. He stated he couldn't park his boat in his driveway because it
would devalue the property and because of that it costs him $600 a year to park his boat elsewhere.
C6. Darreld Van Westrienen, 7825 Layton St., said he has a copy of an application applied to the
City on May 21, 2002, by Native Builders to build a proposed project, the Foothill Vista Apartments, at
the location that the City is denying there is no application.
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page 3
Jack Lam, City Manager, said the City has a pre-application process, which is not a requirement. He said
as far as he knows, this City is the only City around that has a "pre-app" process. He explained that when
the City hears about a project that may be of concern to the community, that person is asked to go
through this process so neighborhood meetings can be held. He said that does not mean that the City
would or would not approve the project. Once the project is submitted, there is a great deal of material
that needs to be submitted; it then goes through a statutory process. He said in this way there is much
more time to discuss it between the neighborhood, the developer and, in this case, for residents to
express concerns here.
Mr. Van Westrienen said whether this is an application or a pre application, the City knew about it and we
were told that there was no application. He said we should have been told there was a pre-application.
Mayor Alexander said there was a big sign notifying the public.
Mr. Van Westrienen stated the agenda item is asking for a certain amount of density that would allow this
to happen.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Approval of Minutes: July 17, 2002
July 25, 2002 (Special Meeting)
July 30, 2002 (Special Adj. Meeting)
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. July 25 through August 15, 2002, and Payroll ending July
28, 2002, for the total amount of $5,960,095.50
D3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2002.
D4. Approval to accept the 2002 Local Agency Biennial Notice pertaining to the City's Conflict of
Interest Code.
D5. Approval of a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition in eminent domain of certain real
property interests for the extension of Day Creek Boulevard and the widening of Base Line Road at
APN 0227-161-21 as part of the proposed Phase I-A Improvements of the Community Facilities District
2001-01. THIS ITEM WAS HEARD AS ITEM G1 - PUBLIC HEARINGS.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-231
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS
NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXTENSION
OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE WIDENING OF BASE LINE
ROAD AS PART OF THE PROPOSED PHASE I-A IMPROVEMENTS
OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
D6. Approval of CLEEP Grant Equipment Purchases. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY
COUNCILMEMBER BIANE.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D6. Approval of CLEEP Grant Equipment Purchases.
Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, said this is another example of the
City's use of technology through grant application funds wherein a very highly sophisticated piece of
City Council Minutes
August 21,2002
Page 4
equipment is being pumhased that will aid in improving levels of police and fire protection in the city and
continue the great partnership that the Fire Department enjoys with the Police Department.
Captain Don Cloughesy, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, explained how the thermal imaging
camera and accessories work for improving fire department and police operations. He explained that the
camera operates with infrared technology that could pick up on a heat signature of a suspect, possible
rescue victim or any object that has molecular movement. This can take that signature and produce a
video image. He said the camera could be used in many ways, as a surveillance tool, with a transmitter
on interior applications and some SWAT applications. He said it could operate in basically zero right, so it
can be used in obstructed areas where there is smoke, tear gas, etc.
Dan Waiters, Crime Analyst, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, said another item they intend to
purchase is a computer called "Fred" (forensic recovery of evidence device). He said it is a specialized
system that is specifically designed for collecting evidence from computers for fraud cases, potential
pornography cases, identity theft cases, etc. He said it does it in a forensically sterile environment that
means any data on the computer is not touched or changed.
Councilmember Biane stated he wanted the public aware of the new technol~)gy and the great things that
are occurring with public safety.
D7. Approval to appropriate funds in the amount of $8,158.47 from the San Bernardino County
Superintendent of Schools Office Grant Budget in the 2002/2003 fiscal year account number
12604015200.
Da. Approval of authorization for the award of gymnastics and dance class services for the
Community Services Department per the proposals received from Rancho Cucamonga Businesses, as
follows: Dynasty Gymnastics - all classes as proposed for age category 24 month - adult; Precision
Gymnastics - classes as proposed for age category 0 month - 23 months and special needs; Inland
Valley Dance Academy - all classes as proposed; and Dance Terrific - all classes as proposed only
excluding beginning Hip/Hop for age category 9 - 15 years.
D9. Approval of a proposal for co-sponsorship of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce's
Grape Harvest Festival scheduled for October 4 - 6, 2002, at the Epicenter Special Event Area.
D10. Approve Resolution granting authority to the City's PARSAC Representative to approve and
execute amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-232
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S DIRECTOR
ON THE PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTHORITY OF
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO APPROVE AND EXECUTE
AMENDMENTS TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY
Dll. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC
2002-00040, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Sharon Circle, submitted by Panattoni
Development Company.
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 02-233
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00040
RESOLUTION NO. 02-234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTNOS.1
AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00040
D12. Approval of a License Agreement with Bobby Beene (CO 02-089) for the operation of a coffee
stand and accessories within the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station. ITEM REMOVED FROM
AGENDA.
D13. Approval of an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Cucamonga School
District (CO 02-090) relating to a Joint Use of the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School gymnasium facility.
D14. Approval to appropriate $82,374 for contract development services by Employment Services
Incorporated, to be funded by the Community Development Technical Services Fund Account No.
1016301-5300.
D15. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the
amount of $55,940.50 ($50,855.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, New West Signal
(CO 02-091), for the In-Roadway Warning Lights at 19th Street (SR 30) and Jasper Street, to be funded
from Safe Routes to School Program Funds, Acct. No. 12343035650, and Transpodation Funds, Acct.
No. 11243035650, and appropriate $20,400.00 to Acct. No. 12343035650/1439234-0, to be fully
reimbursed, and appropriate $5,600.00 to Acct. No. 11243035650/1439124-0 from Transportation Fund
balance.
D16. Approval of single soume vendor selection and award a contract for Senior Center programs from
Gadabout Tours, Inc. (CO 02-092) in the amount not to exceed $50,000 from Acct. #12504015300.
D17. Approval of single source vendor selection and award a contract for the purchase of two (2) roller
hockey borders from Pacific Design Concepts (CO 02-093) in the amount not to exceed $23,500 from
Acct. #12504015605.
D18. Approval of single source vendor selection and award a contract for officiating/umpiring services
for Adult Sports Leagues to Umps Are Us Association (CO 02-094) in the amount not to exceed $6,000
from Acct. #12504015300 and $69,000 from Acct. #17004015305.
D19. Approval of request to enter into a Lease Hold Agreement at Red Hill Park between AT&T (CO
02-095) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of installing a wireless communication facility
for AT&T's Wireless personal communication service.
D20. Approval to accept the FY 2000/2001 Local Street Rehabilitation-Overlay, Contract No. 01-073 as
complete, approval to appropriate $19,074.29 to Acct. No. 11823035650/1022182-0 from AB 2928 Traffic
Congestion Relief fund balance, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor
and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final
contract amount of $572,432.80.
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 02-235
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE FY 2000/2001 LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-OVERLAY,
CONTRACT NO. 01-073 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 5 and 12. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
No Items Submitted.
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fl. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT - DRC2002-00321 - OLTMAN'S INVESTMENT COMPANY - A request to amend the
circulation within the Industrial Development District, Subareas 12 and 13, to eliminate the podion of
Mission Park Drive between Buffalo Avenue and Chades Smith Avenue, submitted by Oltman's
Investment Company-APN: 229-263-68. Related Files: Development Review DRC2001-00718. Staff
has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
Staff report presented by Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Basil Johnson, representing the applicant, provided the background to the request.
Councilmember Biane asked Mr. Johnson what Bradshaw does.
Mr. Johnson said the trade name is the "Good Cook." He said the products are kitchen/cooking
items such as bottle openers, knives, cutlery, pots and pans, and are in many markets.
Councilmember Dutton asked how many jobs might this create for the area.
Mr. Johnson said they will be adding more staff, but he's not sure how many.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-236
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PER
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321 - AMENDING
THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT SUBAREAS 12 AND 13 TO ELIMINATE MISSION PARK
DRIVE, EAST OF BUFFALO AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-263-68
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page 7
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 02-236. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 684.
ORDINANCE NO. 684 (1st reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APP, ROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00321, TO AMEND THE STREET
CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
SUBAREAS 12 AND 13, ELIMINATING THE EXTENSION OF MISSION
PARK DRIVE EAST OF BUFFALO AVENUE BY AMENDING SECTION
17.30.080, FIGURES 17.30.080-0 AND 17.30.080-N OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 684 for September 4, 2002. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the
Development Code to add text provisions for Mixed Use development for two areas: Area One located
on the north and south side of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the abandoned Southern
Pacific Railroad corridor (trestle) also known as the "Bear Gulch Area"; and, Area Two located on the
north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue, both as part of Phase II
of the General Plan Consistency Program. Related Files: Development District Amendment DRC2002-
00446A and Development District Amendment DRC2002-00446B. This amendment is based on the
updated General Plan approved October 17, 2002, for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
certified. This project is within the scope of that previously cer[ified EIR, does not raise or create new
environmental impacts not already considered in that certified EIR, and the previously certified EIR
adequately describes the activities for the purposes of CEQA.
F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the
Development District Map to change the land use designations from General Commercial, Community
Commercial, Office, Office Park, and Specialty Commercial to Mixed Use for 55 acres of land located on
the nodh and south sides of Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and the abandoned Southern
Pacific Railroad corridor (trestle) also known as the "Bear Gulch Area,", as Phase II of the General Plan
Consistency Program - APN: 207-011-33, 35, 36, 43, 44, and 45; 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, and 41;
207-111-01, -02, 05 thru 17 and 23; 207-112-03, thru 06, 09 thru 11, 13 thru 16, 20, and 21; 207-113-01
thru 18 and 23 thru 25; 207-123-33 and 34; 207-571-75 thru 78. Related Files: Development Code
Amendment DRC2002-00448 and Development District Amendment DRC2002-00446B. This
amendment is based on the updated General Plan approved October 17, 2001, for which an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified. This project is within the scope of that previously
certified EIR, does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that certified
EIR, and the previously certified EIR adequately describes the activities for the purposes of CEQA.
F4. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the
Development District Map to change the land use designations from Community Commercial, Specialty
Commercial, and Utility to Mixed Use for 10 acres of land at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Archibald Avenue as Phase II of the General Plan Consistency Program -APN: 208-151-01, 14 thru
16, 19, and podions of 20 thru 22; 208-152-06, 07, 09 thru 12, 14, and 16 thru 22; 208-153-01 thru 05
and 08 thru 23. Related Files: Development Code Amendment DRC2002~00448 and Development
District Amendment DRC2002-00446A. This amendment is based on the updated Generat Plan
City Council Minutes
August 21,2002
Page $
approved October 17, 2001, for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified. This project is
within the scope of that previously certified EIR, does not raise or create new environmental impacts not
already considered in that certified EIR, and the previously certified EIR adequately describes the
activities for the purposes of CEQA.
Staff report presented by Brent LeCount, Associate Planner.
Brad Buller, City Planner, said there was a pre-application and a preliminary review, of which the
applicant is seeking to find out information about the potential of the development of a piece of property.
He explained that the process does require a submittal of an application form so that the City can
document and track the discovery of what that applicant is doing in that process of evaluating their
potential proposal. He said the matter tonight is just the zone change. The issue is for the remainder of
the ten acres of the entire block. There is a cap already existing what is designated Mixed Use for
residential. The zone change today will not increase the amount of residential that can be placed on that
Mixed Use property as it sits today. We are not suggesting that it increase at all; in fact, we are saying it
will stay the same. Adding this ten acres may, in fact, spread out the potential residential density on a
larger block, but we do not think that is likely given the current status of the Community Commercial
zoned properties or the Water District property or the Specialty Commercial along the corner of Archibald
and Foothill; but, it is possible. He said the Mixed Use designation is a concept of planning that gives the
greatest flexibility of land planning. He said this block requires the approval of a master plan; that's where
the neighborhood will be able to be a part of a design review. He said right now they have a preview of
one applicant and he is the first one to take it forward to a neighborhood meeting; he said it is an issue
that staff believes is not related to this zone change. Mr. Bullet said the key he would like to emphasize is
that no greater density of housing, no more number of housing will be approved tonight should a
favorable action on this zone change be taken.
A short discussion ensued regarding the map presented by Brad Bullet regarding the subject area. Brad
Buller said in the neighborhood there are some vacant parcels but all the other parcels have some form of
development on them.
Councilmember Williams asked if Area One and Area Two would be taken together or separately.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that they are very similar and can be taken together but Council is under
no obligation to take them both concurrently.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Darreld VanWestrienen, 7825 Layton St., said the Mixed Use zoning really covers 37.5 acres. He
said they are opposing staff's report that indicates that they would allow 14 units per acre, which
could give a density of anywhere from 210 to 315 residential units. He said the residents would
propose that there be a condition placed on the properties that would only allow 15 acres of
residential and that only 8 units per acre be allowed; or 22.5 acres that would allow 6 units per
acre, which would be 120 units in the entire 37.5-acre area, which would allow condominiums.
He said the residents would also be happy to welcome a senior housing development in this area.
He said high density housing in that area is not going to really reflect what Rancho Cucamonga is
or should be. He said when the residents asked the builder what he thought his proposed project
would do for their area, the builder's answer was "absolutely nothing." He said the last condition
that we would like inclusive is that there not be any density bonuses allowed on this property. He
said other concerns are school overcrowding ~nd crime.
Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton St., said he loves this community and does not want it to change. He
said they are not opposed to development, however, they are opposed to the proposed
development of Tony Mize's Native Building due to density, crime, infrastructure, as there is
currently water pressure concerns in the area. He said the proposed development, because of
the way that property is configured, is landlocked unless the City changes the zoning for Mr.
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page 9
Mize. He said that is why we oppose it now and that is why we want to approach you with
conditions of no more than six units per acre and the preference of a senior complex. He said
they would like the Council to exercise their fiduciary responsibility as their elected
representatives and look after their neighborhood and safety. He said federal studies indicate
that we will lose 25% of our property value. In the interest of love for the City and the love for the
neighborhood, he requested the Council take a positive action and support their needs.
Diane Ballay, 9531 Tryon St., stated that the school issue is a City issue at this time and if they
were to vote on the change of the zoning, then it would be a State issue. She said she volunteers
at Central Elementary School and Central Middle School. She said the parking at Central School
couldn't handle one more car. She said they have already had to get rid of the band room and
what they are going to do is get rid of the resource room and a computer room. She asked that
the Council do not let this happen. She said she also fears for the safety in the neighborhood.
Chris Knopp, 7770 Layton St., commented that high density would not do anything to improve
their conditions. He said statistics show that it will detract significantly from what they have as
property owners. He stated his concern about over crowded schools. He said the developer of
Native Builders has basically told the residents that this is a done deal and that this is going to
happen regardless of what the residents have to say about it. He said a lot of things could be
done with historic Route 66 that could dramatically improve this area, including the development
of an "old town" or something similar. He said the residents want to see good planning and
quality--not quantity. He also would like to ask that the conditions previously mentioned be
considered that would limit six units per acre, which would allow for a better quality type of project
to come in by a reputable developer.
Mayor Alexander asked Mr. Knopp if there had documentation from any of the meetings with Mr. Mize.
He said it disappoints him that anybody would say something is a "done deal."
Greg Routh, 7755 Amethyst, stated he is also concerned that the change in land use for this area
is not going to benefit the surrounding community in the long term. He said he would like to see
the Council rethink the General Plan about this area and lower the density back down to a level
that will attract residents who will have a commitment to our area.
Bennie Davenport, 9608 Langston St., said the residents are not against Iow-income class of
people; they are fighting crime statistics and property values. He stated his concern regarding
the statistics that come with high-density housing, especially federally assisted programs. He
stated his fear of drug-related problems and concern regarding property values.
Richard Roediger, 7830 Layton St., said that the homeowners have a commitment to the area in
which they live in, meaning a long-term investment. He said they are committed to keeping
children and grandchildren safe by making sure of the surroundings. He said the City of Rancho
Cucamonga needs to have a foundation of beauty, wealth, and safety and, above all, respect.
Homeowners are equally responsible for the upkeep of our City; however, the residents and the
voters needed the support of our selected city officials--not to tell us what is good for us, but to
help and work along side us to help develop the city. He said the residents recognize the need to
have something in this location, a restaurant, a small park, something of interest sitting on the
side of Foothill Blvd. He said Foothill Blvd., most famously known as Route 66, needs to be
recognized simply for that. He agrees with the residents and opposes the structure of high-
density apartments; however, if apartments are structured, then the suggestion is to have them
medium density exclusive of any density bonuses.
Dean Miles, Layton St., said his concerns regarding a high-density project are the quality of the
school, the property values and the crime rate. He said it the residents are hoping that the City
Council makes the right decision for the neighborhood.
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page l0
Bill Terrazas, 7820 Layton, said he has lived in Iow-income housing areas previously. He has
worked hard for his home and he does not want to lose what he has now.
Shaun Fesler, 7782 Leucite, said he wants to speak on behalf of retired people, and he does not
want to see his investment go down the drain. He said before he could get permits from the City
for a room addition, he had to pay the school district over $3,000 just to draw permits. He asked
if a developer is going to build high-density units, why are they not subjected to subsidizing
schools like he was. He asked on behalf of the retired people that they do not change the zoning
and leave it to a minimum density if buildings are going to be built.
George Rushe, 7934 Malachite, asked if some of the land could be put aside for a park. He also
thought that senior housing was an excellent idea. He said this and previous councils for this city
don't seem to have done anything to improve the quality of life below Foothill Blvd. He said he
would like to see a local park where you don't have to pack up the kids.
Fred Rowe, 9389 San Bernardino Rd., said if this project goes through, it would not be
reminiscent of Route 66, and it is not our legacy in Rancho Cucamonga. He said we have a
history and legacy that should be provided for eternity.
Steven Wright, 9300 Tryon, said he is not a racist. He said if this Iow-housing income project
goes through, this neighborhood would not be what it was, and it will drive the value of the
properties down. He is now putting major projects on hold, as he now might have to move if
property values drop and crime rates rise. He said he has heard that this is a done deal.
Tom Conroy, 9430 Tryon St., said his concerns were property values, robberies, assaults,
beatings, etc., all things that happen in Iow-income housing. He is also concerned about the
over-crowded schools.
Jeff Siens, 9329 Tryon St., said he wants to echo what has already been said. He would like to
see an amendment put in on this to allow no more than a six-unit per acre maximum. He asked
how many concerned residents need to speak before the Council tonight before anything is
implemented.
Dianne Ballay, 9531 Tryon, spoke again regarding the school issue. She said every person she
has spoken to at the school does not want this to go through. She wants to speak for them, as
they can't come due to conflict of interest.
Mayor Alexander reminded the audience that the City Council does not implement school policies. He
said the way they act, unfortunately, is that they are completely reactionary and not proactive.
Terry Johnson, 9657 Langston, said his concerns are regarding traffic and schools.
Isabel Montanez, 7815 Layton, said she's here to support her neighbors and she does not want
anything to change.
A recess was taken at 9:05 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:28 p.m. with all members present.
Mark V. Vaerini, 9269 Birch St., said it appears that anyone who lived west of Hellman was not
notified about any of the meetings with the builder, etc. He only received a notice about tonight's
meeting. He stated he feels that they would broaden this a little and go all the way to Vineyard,
Base Line, and Foothill. He said he does not want affordable housing close to his home when he
is not there to protect his wife and child. He said he works for a fire department and has seen
what affordable housing does to neighborhoods and to the "call load." He would like the Council
City Council Minutes
August 21,2002
Page ! !
to think about this. He said he would like to be a little more involved with what's going on in the
neighborhood, as he can't afford to move, and he does not want to move.
Scott Robbins, 9631 Effen, stated he previously lived in a bad area and that's why he moved
here. He said in a developed and well-joined community such as this one, dumping this amount
of people, Iow income or not, is not a good thing. He also expressed his concerns regarding the
over crowded schools, traffic and crime.
Steve Boston, 7551 Amethyst, stated his concerns with respect to property values, school over
crowding, traffic (especially corner of Foothill & Archibald) and water pressure. He said (referring
to the map) that it be reversed to make the "yellow section" Commercial instead of Mixed Use.
He asked why they would be making the area Mixed Use if somebody didn't have a plan of doing
something with that section. He said it does not make sense.
Mayor Alexander said these are issues of conformity and there is another item that this is partnered with.
He said this particular parcel does happen to have someone who had expressed an interest, and the City
asked for a pre application. He said many times there have been zones that have been brought up to a
conformity issue where nothing has ever been developed.
Mr. Boston said the surrounding neighborhoods go down hill when Iow-income housing appears.
Paul Meyndert, 750§ Teak Way, discussed the impodance of education, which he felt should be a
big consideration. ,
Robert Reddington, 9640 Effen St., said the people in this neighborhood would keep coming; he
said there is no better place to live. He said he wants to keep the community the way it is.
Darreld Van Westrienen, 7825 Layton St., stated that the school issue is not a matter of a state
issue. He would like the group's proposed conditions placed on this property zoning. He said
just because this plan was made years ago, doesn't mean that it's good for the City now. He said
it is time to change it, and six units per acre would change it and make it right for our community.
He asked the following question of the Councilmembers: "If this zoning as proposed went through
and a builder offered to build 230 units on a piece of property, as Mr. Mize has, which one of you
would be opposed and which one of you would be for that type of housing?"
Mayor Alexander said the question is so subjective. He said there are a lot of different types of projects
when you call them apartment or multi-family dwellings; some of them happen to be so upscale at
$2000/unit per month and some of them may be $700; but to answer your question, "1 might vote on
them, but it all depends on the circumstances."
Mayor Alexander said the reason he is not going to answer that is because of what's going to follow and
that is if there is an appeal. He said it is probably appropriate not to prejudice or bias this particular body.
He said he would like to answer, but, unfortunately there is a legal reason not to."
Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney, said there will be public hearings on any projects that come before the
Council, and it is inappropriate at this time for the Council to express a position one way or the other,
because later then a developer could simply accuse them of determining their decision.
Mr. Van Westrienen said, "1 know that proposal won't happen before November."
There being no further comments, the public hearing Was closed.
Mayor Alexander asked Mr. Buller to address the questions asked.
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page ].2
Brad Buller, City Planner, said he and Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, have been noting the
comments/questions. He said most were comments and not questions. He said one of the issues was
crime. He said regarding that, he has met with the Police Chief. He said the residents keep raising
issues of personal experience and statistical information from studies. Mr. Buller said that the City has
numerous apartment projects throughout the City. He said a lot of them in very similar juxta positions to
single family detached housing tracts. He said the City to date has not experienced what these residents
are saying are issues that they have experienced in other areas that they have lived. He said the issue of
crime is a difficult one to analyze, determine where and what causes it, but the City has no statistical
information. He said they have asked the residents to show us studies that they have so that they could
be compared with what is known in Rancho and then try to address those issues. He said he is aware
that there have been neighborhood watch issues in this neighborhood. He said it might be, even now, a
good reason to reactivate those.
Mr. Bullet said related to students and school issues, the State adopted a law that all cities are obligated
to follow and that is cities cannot deny a project based on school impacts. He said the zoning and
General Plan that is before the City, the City is obligated, purely on school issues, to say "yes" if, in fact, it
meets the local agency's zoning guidelines. He said any developer, whether commercial or residential,
simply have to pay a fee; the City cannot deny a project based on school impacts. Mr. Buller gave an
analogy: "If this project site was to go single family, detached housing, you would actually have more
students even at 6 to 8 dwelling units per acre than you would if the apartment proposal." He said the
student population generation numbers that a school district will use between a single family detached
house will be higher than they will be in an apadment. He said statistically what school districts do is
count how many students are generated from single family versus multiple family properties that are
developed in their district. He said they all vary a little bit, but generally speaking you will have a higher
student population in a single family detached housing project than you will in an apartment project. He
said he spoke with the County School Superintendent and the School Superintendent of this elementary
school district, and the numbers are higher for single family.
Mayor Pro Tem Williams clarified that the formula he mentioned (that there are more students from a
single family detached housing project than an apartment project) is that of the school district and not the
City.
Brad Buller, City Planner, answered affirmatively.
Brad Buller, City Planner, said related to traffic concerns, the City and the engineering traffic analysis
citywide is a constant effort and that is why Haven and some of the other streets were big to begin with.
He said Foothill Boulevard Improvements were traffic-calming devices in order to allow the flow of traffic.
He said if a project is presented to this city in a formal application, that is, an action that has been
submitted for approval, not inquiry of information such as a pre-application or preliminary review, traffic
evaluations must occur to address the amount of traffic, points of ingress and egress; but that has not yet
been presented to the Council or to the Planning Commission.
Brad Builer, City Planner, said related to property values, this could be debated for a long time, but the
City has not seen the determination that apartments, in general, subsidized or not, have devalued a tract
of single family homes in the immediate area. He said property values in Rancho Cucamonga continue to
increase and in the City there are developers developing Mixed Use projects, that is apartments next to
single family, next to condominiums, and those neighborhoods are very successful and some of those
home prices are very high being right next to those type of projects.
Brad Buller said regarding the issue of the request of what is the probability of changing from 14 dwelling
units per acre to something like 8 or 6 dwelling units per acre, he said the only action before this City
Council tonight is this 10-acre parcel of land. He said if we leave it Commercial, it does not change the
density in that area. He said Mixed Use is a land use designation that gives a developer a chance to
move Commercial and Residential around the block to best suit and buffer the issues that the
neighborhood, Foothill Boulevard, might bring to that project's design. He said it is a planning flexibility
City Council Minutes
August 2'1, 2002
Page t3
process that would require a master plan and the neighborhood, the City, the Planning Commission
would have a chance to look at any proposal. He said Mixed Use designation was simply to allow a
flexible tool by which the project area could be developed.
Brad Buller said regarding water pressure, the City will find out from the Water District what they are
experiencing and let them know that this issue was presented to us by a group of neighbors in our City.
Brad Buller said we general plan a property before a project as historically the State requires every City to
have a General Plan and it requires zoning. He said there are cities at all levels of developments; the
State mandates that we have general planning and zoning prior to development; sometimes that's 20
years ahead of the time that the property is developed and sometimes it's concurrent if they want to
change it.
Brad Buller stated regarding density bonus, there is a State requirement that cities offer density bonuses
for affordable housing. He explained how the density bonus is applied. He said, unfortunately, that is a
State law and the State dictates that we are obligated to evaluate.
Councilmember Dutton stated that Tony Mize does not make any decisions for this City. He said nobody
makes a decision for this City except for the citizens who live in this city and this Council. He said that he
(Mr. Mize) does not control anything.
The ordinances were addressed in the following order, however the minutes will remain in agenda
order: No. 687, 686 and 685
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk. read the title of ordinance No. 685.
ORDINANCE NO. 685 (1s~ reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00448 TO ADD TEXT PROVISIONS FOR
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT FOR .'P.~!O .~.RE,~,S; AREA ONE,
APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND
SOUTH SIDES OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE
AVENUE AND THE ABANDONED SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
CORRIDOR (TRESTLE) ALSO KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA";
,%ND ,~,RE,~, ,'P.~.~O, ~,PPROX!.M~,TELY 37.5 ~,CRES, LOC,~,TED OH THE
.HORTH S!DE OF FOOTHILL BOULEV,~,RD BE.'P.~!EEH ~,RCH!~,~,LD
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to amend, as follows, waive full reading and set second
reading of Ordinance No. 685 for September 4, 2002: Amend by deleting last three lines of Ordinance
Title, Area Two (North side of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue). and
delete in the body of the Ordinance Area Two Table on Page 359. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk. read the title of ordinance No. 686.
ORDINANCE NO. 686 (1st reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446A AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM
GENERAL COMMERCIAL, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, OFFICE,
OFFICE PARK, AND SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE FOR
55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES
City Council Minutes
August 21,2002
Page 14
OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND THE
ABANDONED SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORRIDOR
(TRESTLE), ALSO KNOWN AS THE "BEAR GULCH AREA," AS PHASE
II OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM - APN: 207-
011-33, 35, 36, 43, 44, AND 45; 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, AND 41; 207-
111-01, 02, 05 THRU 17, AND 23; 207-112-03 THRU 06, 09 THRU 11, 13
THRU 16, 20, AND 21; 207-113-01 THRU 18, 23 THRU 25; 207-123-33,
AND 34; 207-571-75 THRU 78
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of
Ordinance No. 686 for September 4, 2002. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of ordinance No. 687.
ORDINANCE NO. 687 - NOT APPROVED
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT DRC2002-00446B AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL, AND
UTILITY TO MIXED USE FOR 10 ACRES OF LAND AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD
AVENUE- APN: 208-151-01, 14 THRU 16, AND 19; 208-152-06, 07, 09
THRU 12, 14, 16 THRU 22; 208-153-01 THRU 05, AND 08 THRU 23
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Baine, Curatalo and Williams to deny Ordinance No. 687.
Mayor Alexander said to the residents that they would have to continue to watch what happens. This
vote simply says that no action is being taken; it doesn't mean that other people can't come in there. He
said the residents have to be continuous in watching it.
Councilmember Williams stated that the residents need to be involved with whatever gets proposed. She
said they should think about what could work there that could benefit the City and stay in the keeping of
their neighborhood. She said it has never been the City's policy to do anything that would be detrimental
to any neighborhood on purpose. She said something eventually would have to happen there.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Gl. MOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
iNTERESTS FOR THE EXTENSION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE WIDENING OF BASE
LINE ROAD AT APN: 0227-161-21 AS PART OF THE PROPOSED PHASE I-A IMPROVEMENTS OF
THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
Staff report presented by Maria Perez, Assistant Engineer.
Regina Danner, Law Offices of Richards, Watson & Gershon, stated that the City conducted reasonable
efforts in order to negotiate and reach a voluntary acquisition for this parcel. She said the City did extend
the statutory offer pursuant to Government Code Section 7267, and the property owners were provided a
name and telephone number whom to contact if they had any questions. She said she received a phone
call from a property owner subsequent to sending additional information that they requested. She
advised him that it was his choice to talk to her or the City but that she did represent the City, and she
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page t5
thought it would be more appropriate, unless Council represented him, to talk directly to the City to avoid
any ethical concerns. She said she believed that he did call City staff and staff returned his call; he,
however, never did return their phone call. She said the City has complied to all statutory requirements in
order to attempt to reasonably negotiate with the property owners. She said the attorney representing the
property owners sent a letter on August 16, 2002, to the City Clerk requesting that their letter of
objections be incorporated into the record. She contacted him to inform him that the letter would so be
incorporated into the record. She said based on that, the property owner's attorney sent a letter indicating
that no one would be appearing from his office to make an oral presentation.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no comment, the public hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-231
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUGAMONGA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS
NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION THEREOF IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXTENSION OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD
AS PART OF THE PROPOSED PHASE 1-A IMPROVEMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve Resolution No. 02-231. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. PRESENTATION ON THE SECOND EDITION OF THE CITY'S ANNUAL REPORT (Oral)
Kimbedy Thomas, Management Analyst II, gave the presentation. She reported that the Second Edition
of the Annual Report has arrived and is inserted in the Fall 2002 addition of "The Grapevine," and was
delivered to all residents in August. She added that the report would be made available through the City's
Website, Library and other City facilities, as well as the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce.
Staff will provide copies to surrounding cities and legislators. She said it is the City's goal to promote the
publication to make sure the community is aware of this informative and useful tool.
H2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AND LOCAL SUPPLEMENT, AS THE CITY'S BICYCLE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner.
Councilmember Baine if this information is available on the City's website.
Dan Coleman stated it would be available after the Resolution is approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-237
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NON-
MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2001 UPDATE AND LOCAL
SUPPLEMENT THERETO AS THE CITY'S BICYCLE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
City Council Minutes
August 21, 2002
Page ].6
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 02-237. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
ACTION: Report received and filed.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
KI. Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton St., stated he appreciates the Council's time this evening. He said
when this issue comes up again, he asked for a couple weeks notification and asked that the area be
widened to include between Archibald & Vineyard and Church and Foothill.
Mayor Alexander said the City would notify those who did sign in at this meeting and if there are other
people in those areas that he would like to add to the list for this project area, he may do so.
K2. Raul Delgado, 4758 West Arrow Rte., #102, Upland, questioned what he considered an unlawful
sign on the northwest corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Highway.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, clarified that the location of the sign is actually in the city of Upland.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 10:37 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathryn L. Scott
Deputy City Clerk
Approved:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Cheek No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00187907 8/29/2002 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' 52,099.34
AP-00187921 8/29/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,681.30
AP - 00187932 8/29/2002 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 317.14
AP- 00187937 8/29/2002 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,295.40
AP - 00187941 9/3/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 480.00
AP - 00187942 9/4/2002 3M COMPANY 481.94
AP - 00187943 9/4/2002 99 1 KGGI BUSINESS DEPARTMENT 500.00
AP - 00187944 9/4/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 256.96
AP - 00187945 9/4/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 129.30
AP - 00187945 9/4/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 82.21
AP - 00187945 9/4/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 230.92
AP - 00187945 9/4/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 202.03
AP - 00187945 9/4/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 80.81
AP - 00187946 9/4/2002 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 456.40
AP - 00187946 9/4/2002 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY 1NC 0.01
AP - 00187946 9/4/2002 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ][NC 2,500.00
AP - 00187947 9/4/2002 ACOSTA, ALFREDO 3.80
AP - 00187948 9/4/2002 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 297.51
AP - 00187949 9/4/2002 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 2,129.33
AP - 00187949 9/4/2002 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 4,207.46
AP - 00187950 9/4/2002 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1,050.00
AP - 00187951 9/4/2002 AKENZUA, DAWN 76.00
AP - 00187952 9/4/2002 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 2,322.00
AP - 00187953 9/4/2002 ALWAYS BALLOONS 115.00
AP - 00187954 9/4/2002 ARENCIBIA, ODALYS 200.00
AP - 00187955 9/4/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 895.25
AP - 00187955 9/4/2002 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 9,184.75
AP - 00187956 9/4/2002 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 10,000.00
AP - 00187957 9/4/2002 AUTO SPECIALISTS 110.00
AP - 00187958 9/4/2002 BARIN BALAO, MARYLOU 19.00
AP - 00187959 9/4/2002 BEACKER, JEANANNE 200.00
AP - 00187960 9/4/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 3,272.00
AP - 00187960 9/4/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,914.00
AP - 00187961 9/4/2002 BERRY, RAYMOND 200.00
AP - 00187962 9/4/2002 BRAWNCO CONSTRUCTION 1NC 1,000.00
AP - 00187963 9/4/2002 BRODART BOOKS 2,618.33
AP - 00187964 9/4/2002 CANDIDO, LYDIA 38.00
AP - 00187965 9/4/2002 CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 500.00
AP - 00187965 9/4/2002 CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00
AP - 00187966 9/4/2002 CAPALBO, ROBIN 7.60
AP - 00187967 9/4/2002 CAVANAUGH, SYLVIA 7.60
AP - 00187968 9/4/2002 CERDA, LUPE 7.60
AP - 00187969 9/4/2002 CHAFF1N, SUE 38.0Q
AP - 00187969 9/4/2002 CHAFF1N, SUE 5.00
AP - 00187970 9/4/2002 CHAPUTA, DARLEEN 38.00
AP - 00187971 9/4/2002 CHILDRENS PLUS INC 499.48
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,101.33
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 511.33
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 275.33
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 314.67
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,258.68
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 39.33
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 39.33
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 236.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 1 Current Date: 09/10/5
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:1
2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00187972 9/4/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 157.33
AP - 00187973 9/4/2002 CITY RENTALS 355.00
AP - 00187974 9/4/2002 COMMUNICATION BRIEFINGS 72.50
AP - 00187975 9/4/2002 CSMFO 750.00
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,269.33
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,274.01
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,416.75
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.28
AP ~ 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 70.60
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,361.43
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 664.72
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,677.11
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 18.19
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 35.75
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,924.41
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,202.51
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,751.04
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 115.73
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 826.43
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 896.11
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 29.20
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 28.17
AP - 00I 87976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 497.50
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 837.76
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 46.41
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 174.29
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 692.17
AP - 00i 87976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 781.11
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,814.20
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 494.41
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,938.96
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 538.03
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 3,547.10
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 247.21
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,050.97
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,777.69
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 358.81
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 419.58
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 67.51
AP - 00187976 9/4/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,807.12
AP - 00187977 9/4/2002 DEBORA L BALZER 500.00
AP - 00187978 9/4/2002 DLT SOLUTIONS INC 2,619.05
AP - 00187979 9/4/2002 DOUGHERTY, KlM 38.00
AP - 00187979 9/4/2002 DOUGHERTY, KIM 5.00
AP - 00187980 9/4/2002 DP SOLUTIONS INC 1,344.00
AP - 00187981 9/4/2002 EASTER, PAMELA 36.63
AP - 00187981 9/4/2002 EASTER, PAMELA 13.74
AP - 00187982 9/4/2002 ELDER, KlM 7.60
AP - 00187983 9/4/2002 ESQUEDA, ANITA 38.00
AP - 00187983 9/4/2002 ESQUEDA, ANITA 5.00
AP - 00187984 9/4/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 56.94
AP - 00187985 9/4/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60
AP - 00187985 9/4/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 729.20
AP - 00187985 9/4/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 594.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 09/10/2
Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00187985 9/4/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00
AP - 00187986 9/4/2002 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 875.47
AP - 00187987 9/4/2002 FITZPATRICK, TRACY 174.05
, AP - 00187987 9/4/2002 FITZPATRICK, TRACY 5.00
AP - 00187988 9/4/2002 FORCE 3D MOTORSPORTS 1NC 225.00
AP - 00187988 9/4/2002 FORCE 3D MOTORSPORTS INC 1,677.76
AP - 00187989 9/4/2002 GARNICA, ISABEL 114.00
AP - 00187990 9/4/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 381.50
AP - 00187990 9/4/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 356.53
AP - 00187990 9/4/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 349.70
AP - 00187991 9/4/2002 GEOGRAPHICS 459.02
AP - 00187992 9/4/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 83.80
AP - 00187992 9/4/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 107.88
AP - 00187992 9/4/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 160.14
AP - 00187992 9/4/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 98.13
AP - 00187992 9/4/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 125.56
AP - 00187993 9/4/2002 GUST, JENNIFER 38.00
AP - 00187994 9/4/2002 GUZMAN, JOSE 54.00
AP - 00187995 9/4/2002 HAAS DICTATING SYSTEMS 226.11
AP - 00187996 9/4/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 361.92
AP - 00187997 9/4/2002 HOLIDAY PRINTING 250.00
AP - 00187998 9/4/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 111.54
AP - 00187998 9/4/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 26.08
AP - 00187998 9/4/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF, THE 198.93
AP - 00187999 9/4/2002 HUNT, JENNIFER 25.00
AP - 00188000 9/4/2002 HYATT REGENCY WASHINGTON D.C. 480.90
AP - 00188000 9/4/2002 HYATT REGENCY WASHINGTON D.C. 480.90
AP - 00188001 9/4/2002 IBM CORPORATION 2,242.06
AP - 00188001 9/4/2002 IBM CORPORATION 9,643.65
AP ~ 00188001 9/4/2002 IBM CORPORATION 379.03
AP - 00188001 9/4/2002 IBM CORPORATION 838.99
AP - 00188001 9/4/2002 IBM CORPORATION 379.03
AP - 00188001 9/4/2002 IBM CORPORATION 391.53
AP - 00188002 9/4/2002 ICMA 61.32
AP - 00188003 9/4/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 26.16
AP - 00188003 9/4/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 165.62
AP - 00188003 9/4/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 14.18
AP - 00188004 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00188004 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00188004 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00188004 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40
AP - 00188005 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,005.60
AP - 00188005 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 85.95
AP - 00188005 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 754.20
AP - 00188005 9/4/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 366.75
AP - 00188006 9/4/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 58.18
AP - 00188007 9/4/2002 INTER-CONTINENTAL THE BARCLAY 613.28
AP - 00188008 9/4/2002 1NVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 8,962.00
AP - 00188009 9/4/2002 JENSEN, ERIC 120.00
AP - 00188010 9/4/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 560.03
AP - 00188010 9/4/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 0.02
AP - 00188010 9/4/2002 KC PR1NTING & GRAPHICS 1NC 1,088.07
AP - 00188011 9/4/2002 LANGE, PATTI 38.00
AP - 00188011 9/4/2002 LANGE, PATTI 38.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 09/10/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 08:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00188012 9/4/2002 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 60.39
AP - 00188013 9/4/2002 LATIF, ABID 38.00
AP - 00188013 9/4/2002 LATIF, ABID 5.00
AP - 00188014 9/4/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS 1NC 281.31
AP - 00188015 9/4/2002 LEON, LUIS 73.00
AP - 00188016 9/4/2002 LITERACY PRO SYSTEMS INC 429.93
AP - 00188017 9/4/2002 MARINA LANDSCAPE INC 1,000.00
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,749.92
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,603.86
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,301.44
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT ]NC 6,770.02
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,521.73
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,539.52
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 1,085.52
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT 1NC 2,516.28
AP - 00188018 9/4/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 259.42
AP - 00188019 9/4/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 578.00
AP ~ 00188020 9/4/2002 MARTIN INDUSTRIES 479.49
AP - 00188021 9/4/2002 MART1NEZ, MARIA 23.00
AP - 00188021 9/4/2002 MARTINEZ, MARIA 5.00
AP - 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 126.91
AP - 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 29.99
AP - 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE I31.95
AP 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 62.97
AP 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 22.99
AP 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 151.94
AP 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 75.97
AP 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 48.98
AP 00188022 9/4/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 109.94
AP 00188023 9/4/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 36.52
AP 00188024 9/4/2002 NIGP 290.00
AP 00188025 9/4/2002 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 74.95
AP 00188026 9/4/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS ]NC 525.40
AP 00188026 9/4/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS ]NC 525.40
AP 00188026 9/4/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS ]NC 525.40
AP 00188026 9/4/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS ]NC 525.40
AP 00188026 9/4/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS ]NC 525.40
AP 00188026 9/4/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 525.40
AP 00188027 9/4/2002 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 300.00
AP 00188028 9/4/2002 NATIONS RENT 134.42
AP - 00188028 9/4/2002 NATIONS RENT 97.89
AP - 00188028 9/4/2002 NATIONS RENT 331.41
AP - 00188028 9/4/2002 NATIONS RENT 223.63
AP - 00188028 9/4/2002 NATIONS RENT 373.41
AP - 00188028 9/4/2002 NATIONS RENT 331.41
AP - 00188029 9/4/2002 NG, FENG 38.00
AP - 00188029 9/4/2002 NG, FENG 5.00
AP - 00188030 9/4/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 107.00
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.86
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 243.31
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 79.17
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 61.01
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -156.72
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 58.90
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 09/10/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Poflrait Layout Time: 08:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 297.03
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 660.82
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 63.58
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 203.67
AP - 00188031 9/4/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 18.86
AP - 00188032 9/4/2002 ONOH, VINCENT 200.00
AP - 00188033 9/4/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 2,391.99
AP - 00188034 9/4/2002' PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION INC 772.20
AP - 00188035 9/4/2002 PACIFIC VIDEO PRODUCTS 967.06
AP - 00188036 9/4/2002 PALLOTTO, BILL 120.00
AP - 00188037 9/4/2002 PANOSSIAN, ALICE 38.00
AP - 00188038 9/4/2002 PEREZ, CARLOS 2,069.81
AP - 00188039 9/4/2002 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 913.92
AP - 00188040 9/4/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 930.62
AP - 00188041 9/4/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 32,029.55
AP - 00188041 9/4/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 2,408.21
AP - 00188042 9/4/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,684.15
AP - 00188042 9/4/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,326.48
AP - 00188043 9/4/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 35.00
AP - 00188044 9/4/2002 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 225.28
AP - 00188044 9/4/2002 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 19.34
AP - 00188045 9/4/2002 RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO 306.00
AP - 00188046 9/4/2002 RADULESCU, DAN 111.00
AP - 00188047 9/4/2002 RAULS AUTO TRIM 1NC 113.88
AP - 00188048 9/4/2002 REDINGER, TOM 73.00
AP - 00188049 9/4/2002 RIFFEY, TODD 19.00
AP - 00188050 9/4/2002 RIVERA-MOORE, LAURA 76.00
AP - 00188051 9/4/2002 ROBERTS, JOANNE 177.50
AP - 00188052 9/4/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 97.50
AP - 00188053 9/4/2002 RODRIGUEZ, JESSICA 80.00
AP - 00188054 9/4/2002 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES INC 272.00
AP - 00188055 9/4/2002 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 109.26
AP - 00188056 9/4/2002 RYAN, LEONOR 3.80
AP - 00188057 9/4/2002 S AND S WORLDWIDE 919.67
AP - 00188058 9/4/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 7,145.98
AP - 00188059 9/4/2002 SARCENO, JENNIFER 1 ! .40
AP - 00188060 9/4/2002 SBCSS 120.00
AP - 00188061 9/4/2002 SHARED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD TELECOM i 954.76
AP - 00188062 9/4/2002 SHOWS, SHARA DEE 163.00
AP ~ 00188062 9/4/2002 SHOWS, SHARA DEE 49.00
AP - 00188063 9/4/2002 SMART AND FINAL 22.21
AP - 00188064 9/4/2002 SMITH, JEFF 50.00
AP - 00188065 9/4/2002 SO CA SKATE PARK COALITION 20.00
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.49
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.49
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.56
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.73
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 673.29
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 177.63
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.01
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.85
User: ahunsber - Ann Htmsberger Page: 5 Current Date: 09/10/2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 08:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12A0
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.89
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.81
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.81
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.69
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.92
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.06
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.86
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.92
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.02
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.79
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.97
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.44
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.24
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.09
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 205.79
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.26
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 199.51
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 170.35
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.84
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.42
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.22
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,289.61
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.34
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,918.82
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,549.81
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53,738.68
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 356.41
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29,933.90
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.63
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 132.87
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.18
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.44
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 196.58
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.61
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 152.11
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.51
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,762.34
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 536.47
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 09/10/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 through 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 254.73
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 185.16
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.04
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.26
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.52
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 193.75
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 266.38
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.93
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.72
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.86
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.06
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.91
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.39
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.64
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.53
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.88
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.98
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.33
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.98
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.77
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.97
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.94
AP 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.08
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.57
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.33
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.10
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 114.58
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.06
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.58
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.16
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.32
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.34
AP - 00188068 9/4/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.97
AP - 00188069 9/4/2002 SOUTHWEST AERIAL AND CRANE INSPECTOR,~ 1,070.40
AP - 00188069 9/4/2002 SOUTHWEST AERIAL AND CRANE INSPECTOP~ 1,057.45
AP - 00188070 9/4/2002 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 184.00
AP - 00188071 9/4/2002 SPORT CHALET TEAM DIVISION 2,250.47
AP - 00188072 9/4/2002 STETKEVICH, OREST 108.00
AP - 00188073 9/4/2002 SUNGARD BI TECH 1NC 666.38
AP - 00188074 9/4/2002 SUNRISE FORD 6.66
AP - 00188075 9/4/2002 SYNERGETIC CONSULTING(4TH ANNL FALL U,' 360.00
AP - 00188076 9/4/2002 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 1,230.00
AP - 00188077 9/4/2002 TOMARK SPORTS INC 896.64
AP - 00188078 9/4/2002 U C REGENTS 432.00
AP - 00188079 9/4/2002 U C REGENTS 30.00
AP - 00188080 9/4/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 440.00
AP - 00188080 9/4/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,622.00
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 09/10/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
8/29/2002 tlxrough 9/5/2002
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00188081 9/4/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 28.03
AP - 00188082 9/4/2002 URS CORPORATION 450.00
AP - 00188083 9/4/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 5,935.05
AP - 00188083 9/4/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 1,962.00
AP - 00188083 9/4/2002 US GUARDS CO INC 5,351.91
AP - 00188084 9/4/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 29.26
AP - 00188084 9/4/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 28.69
AP - 00188084 9/4/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 32.17
AP - 00188084 9/4/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 31.34
AP - 00188084 9/4/2002 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 27.73
AP - 00188085 9/4/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 480.00
AP - 00188086 9/4/2002 VU, KIM 11.40
AP - 00188087 9/4/2002 WATSON, LISA 190.00
AP - 00188088 9/4/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 4,642.44
AP - 00188089 9/4/2002 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 13,918.10
AP - 00188090 9/4/2002 WOOLL, CONNIE 15.20
AP - 00188091 9/4/2002 YEE, LARRY 39.00
AP - 00188093 9/5/2002 ABLAC 16.39
AP - 00188098 9/5/2002 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00188100 9/5/2002 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24
AP - 00188101 9/5/2002 DICK, ERIC 2.50
AP - 00188112 9/5/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00
AP- 00188115 9/5/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 8,197.89
AP- 00188118 9/5/2002 RCPFA 4,136.07
AP - 00188134 9/5/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,400.00
AP - 00188135 9/5/2002 HOUSE OF RUTH 633.00
AP - 00188136 9/5/2002 1CBO 206.72
AP - 00188136 9/5/2002 ICBO 62.51
Total for Check ID AP: 479,074.56
Total for Entity: 479,074.56
User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 09/10/~
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 08:1
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
August 31, 2002
Par Market Book % of Days to Y'rM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Local Agency Investment Funds 36,928,023.89 36,928,023.89 36,928,623.89 24.81 1 1 2.558 2.594
Cerilficates of Degesit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.C0 1,512,753.10 1,515,000.00 1.02 365 360 1.720 1.744
Commercial Paper - Discount 12,500,000.00 12,500,000~00 12,437,043.33 8.36 91 27 1.885 1.911
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 86,000,000.00 87,606,83824 85,970,156.25 57.77 1,606 1,141 5.173 5.244
Federal Agency Issues - Discount 6,000,000.00 5,997,600.40 5,981,940.00 4.02 63 10 1.725 1.749
Treasury Securities - Discount 6,000,000.00 5,990,62500 5,981,712.50 4,02 66 32 1.655 1.678
Investments 148,943,023.89 150,535,840.63 148,813,875.97 100.00% 944 667 3.934 3.989
Cash
Passbook/Checking 399,046.67 399,046,67 399,04667 1 I 0493 0,500
Total Cash and Investments
149,342,070.56 150,934,887.30 149,212,922.64 944 667 3.934 3.989
Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 517,410.90 1,065,463.28
Average Daily Balance 151,268,1 35.40 151,665,804.65
Effective Rate of Return 4.03% 4.14%
I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21,2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the
Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values
were obtained from (IDC)~lnteractive Data Corporation pricing service.
The atlached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the pdor month's end is provided under the City official investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
August 31, 2002
Local Agency Investment Funds
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
06050EM85 1145 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2002 1,515,0CO.00 1.512,753.10 1,515,CO0.00 1.720 .1.720 360 0~27/2003
Commercial Paper - Discount
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3133IRMA0 01004 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/0~1998 2,000,000.00 2,030,245.97 2,000,000.00 6.220 6.135 127 01/06r2003
31331H6E2 1075 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,032,500.00 2,000,000.00 5.730 5,652 876 01/24/2005
3129242D4 1119 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/0cc/2002 3,000,000.00 3,031,547.70 3,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 1,254 02/06/~006
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 3
Portfolio Details - Investments
August 31, 2002
Average Purchase Stated YTM Daysto Maturity
CUSIP investment # Issuer Balance Date Par ValL~ Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
312925GT1 1122 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/18/2002 3,000,000.00 3,046,850.74 3,000,000.00 5.020 4.951 1,143 10/18/2005
312925JC5 1126 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/0~/2002 4,000,000.00 4,023,319.70 4,000,000.00 5.200 5.129 1,527 11/(36/2006
31364FG96 01018 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 2,062,083.74 2,000,000.00 6.125 6.041 260 05/19/2003
3136FOAL6 1(~5 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04K)4/2001 4,000,000.00 4,195,000.00 3,994,375.00 5.300 5.259 1,305 03/29/2006
3136FOE~N8 1092 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 3,000,000.00 3,068,437.50 2,997,000.00 5.510 5.457 1,324 04/17/2006
3136FOLU4 1101 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 2,000,000.00 2,120,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.710 5.632 1,361 05/24/2006
3136F1FF2 1118 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 01/23/2002 2,000,0CO.00 2,023,125.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,240 01/23/2006
3136FIXU9 1123 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2002 4,000,000.00 4,077,500.00 4,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,149 10/24/2005
3136F1YT1 1125 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/25/2002 2,000,000.00 2,040,625.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 1,332 04/25/2006
Subtotal and Average 89,642,139.72 86,000,000.00 87,606,838.24 85,970,156.25 5.173 1,141
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
313589FZK) 1135 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/10/2002 6,000,000.00 5,997,600.40 5,981,940.00 1.720 1~725 10 09/11/2002
Subtotal and Average 5,981,940.00 6,000,000.00 5,997,600.40 5,9~1,940.00 1.725 10
Treasury Securities - Discount
9127951.C3 1138 TREASURY BILL 07/25/2002 3,000,000.00 2,996,250.00 2,991,337.50 1.650 1.655 25 09/26/2002
912795LE9 1140 TREASURY BILL 08/01/2002 3,000,000.00 2,994,375.00 2,990,375.00 1.650 1.655 39 10/10/2002
Subtotal and Average 7,271,454.44 6,000,000.00 5,990,625.00 5,981,712.50 1.655 32
Total and Average 151,268,135.40 148,943,023.89 150,535,840.63 148,813,875.97 3.934 667
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Portfolio Management Page 5
Activity By Type
August 1, 2002 through August 31, 2002
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary)
Subtotal 38,128,023.89 3,000,000.00 4~00,000.00 36,928,023.89
Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary)
Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank
06050F-J48 1129 BANK OF AMERICA 1.710 08/27/2002 0.00 1,515,000.00
06050EM85 1145 BANK OF AMERICA 1.720 08/27/2002 1,515,000.00 0.00
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
31331LB23 1120 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.600 08~)1/2002 0.00 3,000,000.00
31331L5K0 1139 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.040 08~1/2002 5,000,000.00 0.00
3133MJL81 1114 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.250 08/20/2002 0.00 3,098,450.00
312924SH7 1113 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 4.150 0~/14/2002 0.00 2,997,187.50
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
Treasury Securities - Discount
Portfolio CITY
CP
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents
For the Month Ended August 3t, 2002
Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost
Bond Issue Pavln;; A(3ent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value
Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund Fimt American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.25% $ 257,311.78
Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Rsserve Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 1.25% 242,789.51
Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 1.25% 154,851.03
Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 654,952.32
PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25% $ 0.04
Cash N/A N/A N/A
1999 A (St) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25% 588,041.28
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Sr. Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25% 1,104,707.02
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Redemption Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 1.25%
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Revenue Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 1.25% 67,319~73
Cash N/A N/A N/A
Residual Fund First Amedcan Treasu[y Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 1.25% 240,87
Cash N/A N/A N/A
$ 1,760,308.94
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,415,26t.26
* Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand.
k~nancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 9/11/2002 7:35 AM
~ A N C H O C U C A M O N GA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Sti ff Report
DALE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: WiLliam J, O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING
BIDS" FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
FROM ETIWANDA AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY, TO BE FUNDED FROM
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1, ACCOUNT NO. 1602303565011414602-0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Foothill
Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Etiwanda Avenue to 1600' easterly, and approve the
attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
This project will install a 78" diameter storm drain in Foothill Boulevard from Etiwanda Avenue to
1600' easterly. The project will be funded with Assessment District 84-1 Funds, Account No.
1602303565011414602-0. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per
Adiclel 9, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines.
The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer.
The Engineer's estimate is $700,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate of
$5,000 for construction survey, $25,000 for soils and material testing, and $1,000 for printing
services. Legal advertising is scheduled for October I and October 8, 2002, with a bid opening at
2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 29, 2002, unless extended by Addenda.
Re .~..c~ully sub, mitred,
City Engineer
WJO:JAD
Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution
Almond Rd -- .,.~-
Ban~
F~.=w. ~.~ PROJECT LOCATION
RANCHO ~ ~ ~ ;
CUCAMONGA ~- < = = = =~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOOTHILL BLVD. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
FROM ETIWANDA AVE. TO 1600' EASTERLY
VICINITY MAP
RESOLUTION NO. 02- ~ q 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROViNG PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM ETIWANDA
AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY" IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cueamonga.
WHEREAS, thc City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
the "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM ETIWANDA
AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work
specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino
County, Califomia, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cueamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 29, 2002, sealed bids or
proposals for the "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM
ETIWANDA AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction for the FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM ETIWANDA AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required
to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character
in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate
RESOLUTION NO.
September 18, 2002
Page 2
of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department
of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file
in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The
Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cueamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any
work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in
any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of
the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to joumeymen that
will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such
cases shall not be less than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 pement in the 90 days prior to the
request of certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to
five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership
through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any
apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are
making such contributions.
RESOLUTION NO.
September 18, 2002
Page 3
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be govemed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set
forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by
him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same
is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100%
of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any
materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the
Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be
required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees
upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City
of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
RESOLUTION NO.
September 18, 2002
Page 4
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall
possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable
laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but
not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) sufficient to cover all the
work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the
Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and
rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15,
shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and
be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of
the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE
DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and
specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above,
together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to
cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in
the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the
"FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM ETIWANDA
AVENUE TO 1600' EASTERLY"
may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4037.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 18th day of September, 2002
2/
RESOLUTION NO.
September 18, 2002
Page 5
Publish Dates: October 1, and October 8, 2002
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 18th day of September, 2002.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on
the 18th day of September 2002.
Executed this 18th day of September 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: October 1 and October 8, 2002
22_
R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA
E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T
DA'IE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lmn, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
I:iy: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Superintendent
SUBJEC'r: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE
INVITING BIDS" FOR PLAYGROUND SAND REPLACEMENT AT
VARIOUS CITY PARKS FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBERS
1120305-5650/1305120-0 ($70,000), 1120305-5650/1306120-0 ($20,500) AND
1120305-5650/1307120-0 ($13,000)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for Playground Sand
Replacement at Various City Parks and anthorizc thc City Clerk to advertise thc "Notice Inviting
Bids."
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Thc following playgrounds have sand that readily compacts to such a degree we no longer have
what is referred to as a "safety surface" under thc play equipment:
Bear Gulch Park, 9094 Arrow Hwy.
Coyote Canyon Park, 10987 Terra Vista Parkway
Spruce Avenue Park, 7730 Spruce Avenue
To achieve and maintain a safe play area, we plan to remove the existing sand and replace with a
uniform particle size sand that does not tend to compact. Council has authorized this budgeted
line item. Engineering Staff has developed specifications for the project and is now ready to
advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". Engineer's estimate for this project is $103,500.
Respectfully submitted,
cilt~l;~l 'netherr
WJO:DC:ju
RESOLUTION NO. 02- 2 q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TItE
CITY OF I~NCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLAYGROUND
SAND REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City
Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and
specifications for the "PLAYGROUND SAND REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY
PARKS".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing
the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall
be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San
Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR
BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON October 9, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for
"PLAYGROUND SAND REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Council, Califomia, marked, "BID FOR PLAYGROUND SAND
REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS".
Please purchase and/or direct requests for plans and specs regarding the "Playground
Sand Replacement At Various City Parks" project to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Engineering Counter, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
91730-3801.
Resolution No.
Page 2
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is
required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a
similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the
general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and
has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing
rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to
any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such
determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer,
workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer,
workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore
stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor
under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen
in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the
site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that
trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to
journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to
journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except:
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request
of certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to
five, or
When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership
through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
when the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any
apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are
making such contributions.
Resolution No.
Page 3
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply
with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours
as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of
California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the
contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore
mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is
required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section
17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent
(10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed
contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said
cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder,
the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall
be returned to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faitlfful performance of the contract for said
work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional
bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work
shall be given to secure the paymen~ of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the
performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any
kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he
carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract
which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the
construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Resolution No.
Page 4
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any
and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this
contract; including but not limited to a "Class A" (General Engineering Contractor), C-12
(Earthwork and Paving Contractor), or C-27 (Landscaping Contractor). In accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be
signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided
is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at
the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho
Cueamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-
FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional
non-reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing
charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth
in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor,
the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and
expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for PLAYGROUND SAND
REPLACEMENT AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS may be directed to:
John Gonzales, Maintenance Supervisor
9153 Ninth Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2730, ext. 4119
By order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 18th day of September 2002.
ADVERTISE ON: September 24, 2002 and October 1, 2002
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayer and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P. City Manager
FROM: Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$64,121.00 AWARDED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM INTO
ACCOUNT #'1368000-4740; AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $7,124.55
IN MATCHING FUNDS TRANSFERRED FROM ACCOUNT #1001701-9368 TO
ACCOUNT #1368000-9001; AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE
$71,245.55 INTO ACCOUNT #1368701-5602 FOR TOTAL GRANT
EXPENDITURES.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve acceptance of a grant award in the amount of $64,121.00 into account #1368000-4740
(Grant Income); authorize appropriation of $7,124.55 in matching funds transferred from
account #1001701-9368 (Transfer Out) to account #1368000-9001 (Transfer In); and authorize
an appropriation of $71,245.55 into account #1368701-5602 (Building Improvements) for total
grant expenditures.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The United States Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program has
offered the Police Department funds for equipment and other special needs. This will be the
seventh year that the City has received these awards. These funds have been a great benefit
to the law enforcement operations in the City.
The award approved by the United States Department of Justice would allow the Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department to fund the building improvement outlined below under the
heading "Proposed Item."
FISCAL IMPACT
$64,121.00 in grant funds would be appropriated for the requested equipment along with
$7,124.55 in matching funds (1/9th match) required by this grant.
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT - 2002/2003
September 18, 2002
Page Two
ADVISORY COMMITFEE
The law requires that each law enforcement agency receiving local law enforcement grant funds
must establish an Advisory Committee to approve the allocation of the funds. For the past
seven years, this Committee has consisted of the following members:
Jack Lam, City Manager, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Public Official)
Dennis Cole, Superior Court Judge (Judiciary)
Pete Ortiz, Police Chief (Law Enforcement)
Richard Maxwell, Supervising District Attorney (District Attorney)
Sonya Yates, Superintendent of Schools (Public Education)
Diane Lee-Mitchell, Director YMCA (Community Member)
On September 9, 2002, the Advisory Committee met and approved the proposed purchases for
the 2002/2003 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PROPOSED ITEM
Construction of a Helipad on the Roof of the Public Safety Building
Securing the homeland involves many priorities such as supporting first responders,
enhancing security measures, and using technology effectively. The construction of a
helipad is a giant step towards providing direct support to patrol officers (first
responders), enhancing security measures in and around critical facilities, and to
maximize resources and technology.
The helipad will be constructed on the roof of the Public Safety Building as part of the
expansion/re-modeling of the facility. The facility is strategically located to respond to
any emergencies within the city. With this asset, the helicopter can be positioned in a
location readily available to respond quickly to school emergencies at our high schools,
middle/junior high schools, and elementary schools. Several potential terrorist targets
are within seconds from the helipad to include a baseball stadium, shopping malls, and
other critical infrastructures. In critical situations, personnel as well as additional
resources could be airlifted from the helipad to anywhere in the city within minutes.
This asset also allows us to augment our current patrol services, deter terrorist activity,
and enhance overall school security.
Total Proposal $ 71,246.00
-2-
T H E C I T Y 0 F
~ AN C 11 O C lJ C A H O N G A
' Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK
TO ACCEPT THE QUITCLAIM DEED EXECUTED BY PERVAIZ AND
NUSRAT KHAN FOR THE ETIWANDA STORM DRAIN, LOCATED
SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE FROM
SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TO THE VICTORIA BASIN
(FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1 t 143035650/1403114-0)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the
City Clerk to accept said Quitclaim Deed.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City purchased right-of-way from the Thompson family and constructed the
concrete channel in late 1988. The legal description of this acquired land failed to
include the .47 acres of land (see exhibit) southerly of the agreement line
established during the quitclaim exchange between the Thompson family and San
Bernardino County Flood Control District.
At that time staff overlooked the need to obtain the .47-acre righl-of-way from the
County who later assessed back to the Thompsons and sold to the Khans at public
auction. Khan, the owner, agrees to quitclaim this land for compensation of
$5,175.00.
Sincerely,
Wi~'am J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sc
AttachmentsS
Date: 10/30/01
Date: 2/5/02
William O'Neil
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Since last year I have been talking to City of Rancho Cucamonga Civil Engineenng
Department, about my Vacant Land in Rancho Cucamonga. City of Rancho Cucamonga
has built a Water Channel by mistake on my Property APN 0227-071-33-0.
Dan James Senior Civil Engineer call me, October 29,2001 that City Engineer has
decided to buy out my Property APN 0227-071-33-0. Asking price of this property is
$5000.00,Assessed Value of this property is $6508.00,market Value $55000.00.
This Land cost me $5000.00 and I am selling to City of Rancho Cucamonga at my Cost.
Break down of $5000.00 as follows:
Purchase price of Land $1550.00
Land Surveyor Fee $ 800.00
Attorney Fee $1200.00
Other Expenses $ 1450.00
Tax, Gas, Long Distance Calls, Research Hours.
Copy of 2001 Tax bill, Trust Deed
Assessor Map, Title History Page attached.
Other expenses year 2002 $175
TOTAL COST $5175.00
Nusmt Khan
21152 Stonecreek Dr.
Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
(949) 858-7536
CC: Dan James (Senior Civil Engineer)
RESOLUTION NO. 02-2'Z~
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY CLERK TO ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED EXECUTED
BY PERVAIZ AND NUSRAT KHAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
for its consideration acceptance of a quitclaim deed for the improvement of public right-
of-way on, over, under, across and along the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located south of Highland Avenue, east of East Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said real property requires payment of $5,175.00 to Pervaiz and
Nusrat Khan, property owners, who agree to execute a quitclaim deed.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said quitclaim deed is hereby
approved and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to accept said quitclaim deed on
behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Slaff Report
DATE: September 18.2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2002/03
THROUGH 2006/07 AND TVVENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN
BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2002/03 AS REQUIRED FOR MEASURE 'T'
FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Local
Measure "1" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan
as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure
"1" Funds.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Measure "1", the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local
jurisdiction receiving revenues annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
and a Twenty-Year Transportation Plan which outlines the specific projects upon which
those funds shall be expended.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN/TVVENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN
September 18, 2002
Page 2
Staff has prepared the attached Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan schedule to be
adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments
for informational purposes. The Five-Year list has been over-programmed to allow for
spillage and to insure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure "1"
expenditures. If changes are necessary (additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at
each annual adoption or intermittently with City Council approval.
SANBAG has advised us the Twenty-Year Transportation Plan for Local Measure "1" Funds
can be a list of projects for a 20-year period or narrative policy statement estimating the
types of projects Local Measure "1" Funds are to be used for, and the percentage of funds
allocated for each type of project. Since it is difficult to list actual projects 20 years in
advance, Staff recommends Council approve the policy statement.
Respectfully submitted,
W O Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BRH:Is
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 02-2-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-
YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL
YEARS 2002/03 THROUGH 2006/07 AND TWENTY-YEAR
TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR
2002/03 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE 'T' FUNDS
On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, on motion by , seconded by
, and carried, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, finds as follows:
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure 'T' in
November, 1989 authorizing San Bemardino Associated Governments, acting as the San
Bemardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one pement retail
transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the
County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and
traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No.
89-1 of Authority; and
WHEREAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires each local jurisdiction
receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local
jurisdiction, and
WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction
annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty-Year plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan, a copy of which is attached to
this resolution.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 2002/07
YEAR STREET & LIMITS IMPROVEMENT Cost Estimate ($)
02/03 6th St - Archibald to Hermosa Pavement Rehabilitation 165,000
8th St - Grove to Baker Pavement Rehabilitation 1,000
ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications 110,000
Amethyst St - 19th to Hillside Pavement Rehabilitation 1,000
Arrow Rte - Grove to Baker Pavement Rehabilitation and widening 2,000
Banyan - E/O Milliken to Rochester Widen north side 460,000
Banyan - Sapphire to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation 20,000
Base Line Rd - Vineyard to Hellman Pavement Rehabilitation 2,000
Beryl St - Cielito to 19th Pavement Rehabilitation 105,000
Carnelian St - Vivero to N/O Base Line Pavement Rehabilitation 160,000
East - Banyan to N/O 23rd Widen west side 580,000
Etiwanda - 6th to Arrow Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 20,000
Grove Av - 8th to Foothill Pavement Rehabilitation 418,000
Hermosa Av - N/O Chumh to N/O Base Line Pavement Rehabilitation, widening, and Storm Drain 522,000
Hermosa Av - N/O Base Line to N/O RXR Pavement Rehabilitation, widening, and Storm Drain 621,000
Lemon Av -Beryl to Archibald Pavement Rehabilitation 296,000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 210,000
Milliken Av - 4th to 7th Pavement Rehabilitation and widening 433,000
Milliken Av - Banyan to Wilson Construct west roadbed of divided arterial street 500,000
FY 02/03 Total 4,626,000
03/04 ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications 100,000
Base Line Rd - West City Limits to Carnelian Pavement Rehabilitation 200,000
Haven Av - Baseline to Highland Ph 1 Widen west side, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain 500,000
Hermosa Av - Foothill to Effen Widen 300,000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 400,000
FY 03/04 Total 1,500,000
04/05 ADA Corrective Measures - City Wide Intersection ramps and driveway modifications 100,000
Etiwanda Av - Foothill to Baseline Ph 1 Street widening and widening of I-15 underpass 100,000
Haven Av - Baseline to Highland Ph 2 Widen west side, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain 500,000
Hermosa Ay - Highland to Banyan Widen and pavement rehabilitation 350,000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 400,000
Wilson Ay- Amethyst to Haven Desitin street widenin~ and pavement rehabilitation 100,000
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR PLAN 2002/07
YEAR STREET & LIMITS IMPROVEMENT Cost Estimate ($)
FY 04/05 Total 1,550,000
05/06 Archibald Av - S/O Banyan to Hillside Design street widening and pavement rehabilitation 70,000
Etiwanda Av - Foothill to Baseline Ph 2 Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 800,000
Haven Ay- Baseline to Highland Ph 4 Widen west side, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain 500,000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 400,000
Wilson Av - Amethyst to Haven Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 300,000
FY 05/06 Total 2,070,000
06/07 Archibald Ay - S/O Banyan to Hillside Acquire right of way 50,000
Etiwanda Av - Foothill to Baseline Ph 3 Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 500,000
Haven Av- Baseline to Highland Ph 5 Widen west side, pavement rehabilitation, & storm drain 500,000
Haven Av - Baseline to Highland East side Pavement Rehabilitation 380,000
Local Streets - City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 400,000
Wilson Av - Amethyst to Haven Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 300,000
Wilson Av- Haven to Canistet Street widening and pavement rehabilitation 350,000
FY 06/07 Total 2,480,000
Five Year Total 12,226,000
Measure I Revenue Estimate (5 Yrs.) 9,243,946:
IContact: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil En~lineer (909) 477-2740 Ext, 4065
Page 2 of 2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MEASURE I FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EXPENDITURE STRATEGY
2002/2003
The City currently has a Measure I fund balance of $4,780,000. The FY 2002/03 budget
contains projects totaling $4,626,000, leaving a balance of $154,000 at the end of the
year. It is estimated that we will accrue and additional revenue of $1,600,000 during the
year leaving a balance of $1,754,000. These funds will bc budgeted in the FY 2003/04.
It has been the City's policy to budget funds based upon accrued funds rather than an
anticipated amount resulting in a year ending fund balance of the past year's accruals.
The City intents to expend its Measure I funds generally as shown on our 20 year plan
(attached). However, at present, we show funds being accumulated over several years for
one large project, the Haven Avenue widening and storm drain project extending from
Base Line Road to the 210 Freeway ($500,000 per year for a total of $2,000,000 in four
years). These funds could be reallocated in any given year depending upon a change in
priorities.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
20 YEAR LOCAL MEASURE I TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The 20 Year Local Measure I Transportation Plan for the expenditure of Measure I funds
will use the City's General Plan Circulation Element as a basis (copy attached). It is
anticipated that the funds will be allocated in the following manner:
Percent Type of Improvement
30 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair of Existing Roadways
10 Traffic Signal Improvements
20 Street Widening
10 Intersection Improvements
10 Railroad Crossing Improvements
20 Slurry and Chip Seal of Existing Streets
Figure III- 3
CIRCULAIION PLAN
SECONDARY
,~A.,O. ARTERIAL
MA~JOR DI¥1DED
ARTERIAL ' .........
I EXISTING INTERCHANGE
0 PROPOSED INTERCHANGE
(~) FREEWAY INTERCHANGE
II GRADE SEPARATION
· INTERSECIION FOR
POSSIBLE WIDENING
~ SPECIAL BOULEVARD
i,~ii~ SPECIAL DESIGN
[-'::-'] SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE
.¸%
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
l~ NG INI~E DIN G DIVI&ION
Staff Relmrt
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE GENERAL
CITY AREA MASTER PLAN FOR FY 200'1/2002 AND APPROPRIATE
$151,985 FOR FUND 1112-303-5650/1026112-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $151,985.00 for
Fund 1112303-5550 for General City Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement
Agreements for FY 2001/2002.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
General City Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements are based on the net
General City Drainage funds received each fiscal year.
Respectfully submitted,
Willia'rd J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SH:sc
~ A N H O C U C A M O N G A
1~ ~CIN EI~DIN G DIVI&ION
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE ETIWANDA
AREA MASTER PLAN FOR FY 2001/2002 AND APPROPRIATE
$333,983 FOR FUND 1116-303-5650/1026116-0
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve an appropriation of $333,903.00 for
Fund 1116303-5650 for Etiwanda Area Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement
Agreements for FY 2001/2002.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Etiwanda Area Master Plan Drainage Reimbursement Agreements are based on the net
Etiwanda Drainage funds received each fiscal year. The remaining funds in the
Etiwanda Drainage Fund will be utilized for City projects.
Respectfully submitted,
C~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SH:sc
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00675, LOCATED AT 12167 ARROW
ROUTE (OLD AMPAC SITE), SUBMITTED BY COPART, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said
agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2002-00675, located AT 12167 Arrow Route (old AMPAC site), was approved by
the Planning Commission of January 23, 2001, for the development of 14,673 foot office
building to support a weekly auto auction on 33.5 acres, 9.4 acres of additional storage
area on the adjacent SCE parcel. For a total of 42.9 acres in the Heavy Industrial Area
(Subarea 15).
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sc
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
VIC~N~ T Y MA P
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMOHGA
RESOLUTION NO. O.~- ~--~--'~'/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-
00675
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance
Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance
Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of
majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of
property within the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the
State of California ("Article XIIID') establishes certain procedural requirements for the
authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the
Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively,
the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of
annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in
Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To
A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real
Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act
to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly
consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2001-00675
September 18, 2002
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972
Act and/or Article XlIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual
assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the
authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments
against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory
do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred
on each such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from
the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the
cost of the maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the
proposed annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements
from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves
and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed
the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy
of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
COPART INC.
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL NO. 1
That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 1 South, Range 6 West, San Bernardino
base and meridian. In the County of San Bemardino, State of California, according to the official
plat thereof, and as described by the document recorded May 1, 1989, as Instrument Number 89-
53460, Official Records said County, more particularly described by said document as follows:
Commencing at a point on the center line of Arrow Route Highway that is 2340.60 feet East of its
intersection with the center line of Rochester Avenue (also known as Orange Avenue); THENCE
South 00 deg. 12' 15" East (recorded South 0 deg. 22' 00" 00" East) 30.00 feet to the South line of
said Arrow Route Highway and the TRUE POINT OF BEG[pINING; THENCE South 0 deg. 12' 15
East (recorded South 0 deg. 22' 00" East) 693.60 feet; THENCE south 89 deg. 50' 15" East (recorded
East) 240.11 feet; THENCE South 0 deg. 09' 45" West 1040.77 feet (recorded South 1035.00 feet) to
the beginning of a ~angent curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 600.00 feet;
THENCE Southwesterly 781.47 feet along said curve through a central angle of 74 deg. 37' 29" to a
point of non tangency on the North line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad right of way
100.00 feet wide, said point being radial at a bearing of South 15 deg. 12' 46' East; THENCE South
88 deg. 09' 45" West along the North line of said right of way a distance of 383.33 feet; THENCE
North 01 deg. 08' 44" west 1199.49 feet (recorded 1200 feet): THENCE North 00 deg. 26' 40" East
1128,74 feet to the South line of Arrow Route Highway (60 feet wide); THENCE South 89 deg. 41'
10" East 601.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,
Except therefrom that portion conveyed to the State of California for freeway purposes by deed
recorded February 11, 1972 in Book 7856, page 708, Official Records of Said County.
A-1 DRC2001-00675 d.//~
PARCEL NO. 2
A right of way across `that portion of Southwest 1/4 of Section g, Township 1 South, Range 6 Wes`t,
San Bernardino base and meridian, in the County of San Bemardino, Sta,te of California, according
to government survey, and as described by the document recorded May 1, 1989, as Instrument
Number 89-53460, Official Records said County, more particularly described by said document as
follows:
Beginning at a point on the center line of Arrow Route Highway that is 2340.60 feet East of its
intersec,tion wi`th the center line of Rochester Avenue (also known as Orange Avenue); THENCE
South 00 deg. 12' 15" East (recorded South 0 deg. 22' 00" Eas,t), 30.00 feet to the South line of said
Arrow Route Highway and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 0 deg. 12' 15" East
(recorded Sou`th 0 deg. 22' 00" Eas,t) 693.80 feet; THENCE South 89 deg. 50' 15" Eas,t (recorded
East) 240.11 feet; THENCE South 0 deg. 09' 45" West 1040.77 feet (recorded South 1035.00 feet) to
the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 600.00 feet;
THENCE Sou,thwes,terly 781.47 feet along said curve through a central angle of 74 deg. 37' 29" to a
point of non tangency on the North line of the A,tchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad right of way
100.00 feet wide, said poin,t being radial at a bearing of South 15 deg. 12' 46" East; THENCE North
88 deg. East 549.12 fee,t along said right of way line THENCE North 9 deg. 30' West 165.48 feet;
THENCE North 4 deg. 04' East 277.17 feet; THENCE North 141 g.63 feet; THENCE North 12 deg.
49" East 219.g9 feet; THENCE North 5 deg. 11' East 216.1 g feet to a point on the South fight of way
line of the Arrow Route Highway; THENCE West along said south right of way line of Arrow Route
Highway 412.88 feet 'to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Together with the right to construct a crossing not to exceed 20.00 feet in width over said Parcel No.
2 with the restriction tha,t said crossing shall not obstruct the use of said parcel as a wash. The
centerline of said crossing to be located 1640.60 feet south of the cen,ter line of Arrow Route
Highway.
A - 2 DRC2001-00675
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways,
street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres
associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance
building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City
but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses
the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by thc district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill
Boulevard.
B- 1 DRC2001-00675
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: DRC2001-00675
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 ...... * .........
SLD # 6 I ............
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L 3B ............
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres S I S 6 L 3B
N/A 41.2 .........
B - 2 DRC2001-00675
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
I.and ll~e llnit Tyne llnit~ I lnit~ Factor 1 lnit~ llnit Revenue
Comm/Ind Acm 2063.86 1.0 2063.86 $352.80 $728,129.81
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00675) is:
41.2 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $14,535.36 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
1 .and 1 l~e 1 Init Tyne 1 lnits I lnit~' Faetnr 1 lnit~ 1 Init Revenue
Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38
Multi-
Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51
Family
Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2,00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00
TOTAL $532,174.89
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00675) is:
41.2 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $1,464.25 Annual Assessment
C 1 DRC2001-00675 ~-~2
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
1 ,and 1 l~e I Init Tyne l ]nits l Init~ Factor [/nits ! lnlt Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00675) is:
41.2 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $2,117.68 Annual Assessment
C- 2 DRC2001-00675
R A C h O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF RADIO EQUIPMENT
FROM MOTOROLA INC., iN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $31,300,
FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001-5603, FROM A PIGGYBACK
OPPORTUNITY ' ON THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO'S
CONTRACT #89-639
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the sole source purchase of radio
equipment from Motorola Inc. in an amount not to exceed $31,300, from account
number 1712001-5603, from'a piggyback opportunity on the County of San
Bernardino's contract #89-639.
BACKGROUND
This purchase is to replace the radios used for events by Community Services; to
provide for Public Works staff that currently do not have a radio and to provide units for
backup in the event of an emergency. The old units are the Motorola STX model, that
have been out of production for several years. Parts are becoming difficult or
impossible to obtain, and old ones have been used as parts donors to keep the
remainder operating. The STX units went into service in 1990 when we migrated to the
800 MHZ system.
Along with the Fire District, the City has been incrementally converting to the MTS 2000
model, currently used for daily operations, emergencies and coordination by the City,
Fire District, Cucamonga County Water District, RC Police Department and several
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF RADIO EQUIPMENT
September 18, 2002
Page 2
other regional agencies. This purchase will piggyback on the County of San
Bemardino's contract #89-639, for Motorola products.
The City has extensive infrastructure and investment with the Motorola 800 MHZ
trunking radio system, and only radios manufactured by Motorola will work with this
regional system. This model has been determined to meet the needs of the end users
and provide consistency for repair, programming, etc.
Respectfully sumitted,
Will'~r~ O'Neil ~
City Engineer
WJO:DC:ju
[~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DRC2001-00423,
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE, NORTH
OF 4TM STREET, SUBMITTED BY MASTER DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
DRC2001-00423, located on the west side of Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street,
was approved by the City Planner on October 18, 2001, for the development of a
72,000 square feet warehouse/distribution building, on 4.23 acres of land in the General
Industrial District.
The Developer, Master Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $9,120.00
Labor and Material Bond: $4,560.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2001-00423
September 18, 2002
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sc
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
~ POOR't/LL 8L VD. '~
CITY ~ ~
ARROW ROUTE
SIT£ city o,;
~ rONTANA
m'OUR TN S TRE.mT
= TO POMONA TO SAN BERNARDII .
¥1CIN/TY MAP i
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR DRC2001-00423
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Master Development
Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real
property specifically des,cthribed therein, and generally located on the west side of the Santa
Anita Avenue, north of 4t Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as DRC2001-00423; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest
thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof
by the City Attorney.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2001-
00423
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance
Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance
Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of
majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of
property within the territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the
annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XlIID of the Constitution of the
State of California ("Article XlIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the
authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the
Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively,
the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of
annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in
Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly
executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To
A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real
Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act
to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly
consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
RESOLUTION NO.
DRC2001-00423
September 18, 2002
Page 2
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have
also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972
Act and/or Article XlIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual
assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the
authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments
against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory
do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred
on each such parcel from the Improvements.
b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from
the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the
cost of the maintenance of the Improvement.
c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the
proposed annual assessments.
SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements
from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves
and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed
the amounts set forth in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy
of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner of the Property is:
MASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The legal description of the Property is:
PARCEL 6, iN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDiNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 4749, ON FILE
iN BOOK 4783 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 28 AND 29, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF
SAID COUNTY.
A- 1 DRC2001-00423
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that
district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways,
street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres
associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance
building).
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or
installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The
facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the
City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or
installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City
but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses
the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and
traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill
Boulevard.
B-1 DRC2001-00423 dj
Exhibit "B" continued
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003)
For Project: DRC2001-00423
Number of Lumps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD # 1 ...... * .........
SLD # 6 1 ............
Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L3B ......... 7
*Existing items installed with original project
Assessment Units by District
Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B
N/A 4.23 ...... 4.23
B-2 DRC2001-00423 d~/
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l ,and l lse l Init Tyne l Jnit~ I Init~ Factor I lnits l Init Revenue
Comm/Ind Acre 2063.86 1.0 2063.86 $352.80 $728,129.81
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00423) is:
4.23 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $1,492.34 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
l,and II~e Ilnit Tyne Units llnitq Factor lTnit~ Nnit Revenue
Parcel 18,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38
Multi-
Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51
Family
Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.77 $79,804.00
TOTAL $532,174.89
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00423) is:
4.23 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. -- $150.33 Annual Assessment
C-1 DRC2001-00423 ~5
Exhibit "C" continued
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL):
The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table
summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial):
# of # of Rate Per
Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment
1 .and 1 l~e l Init Tyne 1 lnit~ 1 lnit~ Factor I lnit~ I Init Revenue
Comm/Ind Acm 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2001-00423) is:
4.23 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $150.33 Annual Assessment
C -2 DRC2001-00423 ~ ~
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SlaffReport
DATE: September 1 fl, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
~: APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUP/W129-97 (CITY OF ONTARIO CUP), LOCATION ON
THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE NORTH OF THE 1-10 FREEWAY IN
THE CITY OF ONTARIO, SUBMITTED BY CCG ONTARIO, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Improvement
Agreement and Improvement Security.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Cup/w129-97 (City of Ontario CUP), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, North of the I- 10
Freeway, was approved by the City of Ontario and the County of San Bemardino for the
development of Kaiser Commerce Center.
The Developer, CCG Ontario,LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the
construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond $137,300.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 68,650.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:sc
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
-, CiTY
CUCAJ~ON~A -~-/ I c,'rY uMrrs
FOOTHILL / ~ BOUL~ARD
/ M~ROLINK [ ........
4th ~EET ~ '.~ ~AN BERN~DINO AVENUE
SAN BER~ROINO
BD~O :' '
' DITY OF / ~' F~NT~N~
CITY OF
RAHCHO CUCAMOHGA
RESOLUTION NO. 02- 2'~'/7/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR CUPNV129-97 (CITY OF ONTARIO CUP)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by CCG Ontario, LLC, as
developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue,
East of the 1-10 freeway; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the
development of said real property referred to as CUP/2129-97 (City of Ontario CUP); and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good
and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on
behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest
thereto; and
2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and
sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof
by the City Attorney.
I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
CITY ]YlA NAG E R ' S OFFICE
Staff Report
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AIGP, City Manager
FROM: Duane A, Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE: September 18, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE
ALTA LOMA, CENTRAL, CUCAMONGA AND ETIWANDA SCHOOL
DISTRICTS AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT FOR THE DARE PROGRAM FOR FY 2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the Alta Loma, Central, Cucamonga and Etiwanda
School Districts and the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department for the DARE
program for fiscal year 2002-2003.
BACKGROUND
The total DARE budget for fiscal year 2002-2003 is $258,014. This amount is
shared between the City and the school districts to bring this program to all fifth
grade students in the City. This sharing arrangement is memorialized in the MOU
and reflects a total contribution from ali of the elementary school districts of
$125,762. The remainder of the DARE budget is funded from the general fund
budget for police operations.
It is recommended that this MOU to fund this well received and popular program be
approved.
ResRectfully submitted,
Assistant to the City Manager
R A N H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: John Martin, Associate Engineer
SUBJECt: AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADULT SPORTS PARK AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS, TO
INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $176,412.00
($160,374.50 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1120305-
5650/1209-120-0
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the construction of the Adult
Sports Park and Parking Lot Improvements, to International Pavement Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $176,412.00
($160,374.50 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No. 1120305-5650/1209-120-0
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action on July 17, 2002, bids were solicited, received and opened on August 13, 2002, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $248,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be
complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and
finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Construction is preliminarily scheduled to begin on October 14, 2002 and will include upgraded and additional handicap
access to parking areas and softball fields. There will be 45 construction or "working days" for the project; bringing the
end of construction, to approximately December 12, 2002.
Bid Summary:
Bidder Bid Amount
*International Pavement Solutions, Inc. $160,374.50
JDC, Inc. $198,150.50
E.A. Mendoza $222,100.00
Inland Asphalt and Coatings $254,900.62
* Apparent Low Bidder
R~.p~ully submitted,
W~ JX) Nell
City Engineer
WJO:DC:ju
7/
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTIqENT
StaffR rt
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
SUBJECF: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
AS THE SINGLE SOURCE SERVICE PROVIDER AND INSTALLER
FOR HVAC AND RELATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR
, CITY FACILITIES; APPROVE THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT FOR $129,936 TO INCLUDE CAPITAL MAINTENANCE
PROJECTS AND APPROVE EXTRA WORK NOT TO EXCEED $100,000.
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304
AND 1700201-5304; HVAC SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS TO BE FUNDED
FROM 1025001-5602, 5304; AND EXTRA WORK TO BE FUNDED FROM
VARIOUS CITY ACCOUNTS.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize Invensys Building Systems, Inc.
as the single source maintenance provider and installer for HVAC and related energy
management systems for City Facilities; approve the annual maintenance agreement for
$129,936 and approve Invensys as the single source provider for t-IVAC/Control work, including
the following Capital Maintenance projects approved by the City Council in the 2002-2003
budget: replace boilers at the Civic Center ($80,000), install low ambient temperature sensors at
the RC Family Sports Center ($15,300), replace failing A/C units at Lions West ($48,000), and
Power Planner installation citywide ($30,000); and approve extra work not to exceed $100,000.
Maintenance Contract to be funded from 1001312-5304 and 1700201-5304. HVAC system
installations to be funded from 1025001-5304. Extra work to be funded from various city
accounts.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Invensys (formerly Robertshaw Controls/Siebe Environmental) has been the City's single source
HVAC contractor for several years, providing energy management, preventive maintenance,
?2-
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
INVENSYS
September 18, 2002
Page 2
capital equipment replacement/repair, system upgrades and emergency services for several
hundred thousand square feet of City Facilities. A competitive bid process was conducted in
1996, at that time it was found that Invensys (Siebe Controls) was the only qualified provider of
these integrated services and clearly demonstrated their unique ability to provide the combined
services necessary to manage the city's HVAC/Controls system. Invensys consistently provides
cost effective and responsive service on routine and emergency maintenance of the city's multi-
million dollar mechanical systems and are uniquely equipped to manage the energy management
control systems. Specialized knowledge of, and extensive experience with the mechanical
systems of the Civic Center and the Epicenter are essential for the proper repair and operation of
systems that keep the environmental and HVAC systems in these facilities functioning properly.
Respectfully submitte, d,
Wil~J. O Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DC:ju
Attachment
S.mmary of Funded HVAC/Controls Projects, City Facilities~ Fiscal 2002-03
Replace Boilers/Civic Center $80,000 1025001-5602
Install Low Ambient Temperature $15,300 1025001-5602
Sensors/RC Family Sports Center
Replace Failing AC Units/Lions West $48,000 1025001-5602
Power Planner Installation/Citywide $30,000 1025001-5304
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002---~
TO: Mayor William J. AlexanUer, Members of the City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
BY: Robert Bowery, Information Systems Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVE SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION AND AWARD
A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SERVER DISK DRIVES
AND RELATED COMPONENTS FROM PIONEER-STANDARD
ELECTRONICS IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $117~064.00
FROM ACCOUNT 1001714-5605
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of IBM Server disk
drives and related components from Pioneer-Standard Electronics in the amount not
to exceed $117,064.00 from account 1001714-5605.
BACKGROUND
The City's main server hosts the finance and accounting, class registration, and
permitting database applications. Currently the server lacks data storage drives of
an adequate size to meet data storage needs and provide for growth over several
years.
To ensure product compatibility, provide coverage under a unified maintenance
agreement, and to satisfy data storage needs, Staff obtained single source quotes
for the purchase of twelve (12) 36.4-gigabyte hard drives from the regional IBM
reseller, Pioneer-Standard Electronics. Ten of the drives are for installation on the
main server and the remaining two are for installation on the GIS server. The costs
for the drives are $56,573 and $3,856 respectively.
In addition to the data storage needs, the main server is vulnerable to disruption in
the event of a catastrophic failure of the City's main server or a natural disaster that
disables the Information Systems Division's Civic Center computer center. Staff also
obtained a single source quote from Pioneer-Standard Electronics standard for the
purchase of an offsite "warm site" server. This purchase is again predicated on the
Page 2
September 18, 2002
need to ensure product compatibility and provide coverage under a unified
maintenance agreement.
As part of the Information Systems Division's implementation of a comprehensive
disaster recovery and emergency operations system, the Division is establishing a
"warm site" server at a location offsite from the Civic Center. The "warm site" IBM
p630 System server will provide a copy of mission critical database systems like
IFAS (finance and accounting). Should the City experience a main server failure,
the "warm site" server will take over providing essential database services. The cost
for "warm site" server is $56,635.
Pioneer Standard has a good performance record on recent similar acquisitions that
shows their ability to conform to the City's urgent needs. Prior business dealings
between the City and Pioneer-Standard Electronics highlight that they have the
experience, capacity, and skill to perform the contract as required.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
Date 7/16/2002
0
QUOTE TOTAL $56,573.00
Serial Disk System - Advanced Drawer Model $8,983.00 8,983.00
Hungary Manufacturing Indicator N/C s0.00
~ HZ AC Power Supplies $1,409,00 1.409.00
{avert Black Drawer Cover $176.00 176.00
1, 10K/36.4 GB Advanced Disk Module $4,157.00 41,570.00
.~.5 Meter Advanced SSA Cable s45.00 ~80.00
;lish N/C $o.oo
$4,055.00 4,055.00
$200.00 200.00
$0.00 S
$0.00 $
$0.00 $
Back to tod $56,573.0~,.~7
Prepared for: The City of Rancho Cucamoncja Pioneer Rep Moses Rangel
pE401BS0 Drive upgrade $0.00 $
36.4 GB 10,(~0 RPIVl Ultra3 SCSI Disk Drive $1.765.00 $ 3,530.00
SO.CD $
Sales Tax $276.00 $ 276.00
$o.oo
$o.oo $
$o.oo $
$o.oo
Back to top $3,856'007 ~
Date: 8/21/200~
Prepared for: The City of Ranche Cucamonga Pioneer Rep Moses Rangel
Contact: Lorraine Phen9 Address: 0
QUOTE TOTAL $56,635.00
add sales tax, shipping, handling
)630 System $0.00
mwe1411a 7028-6C4 (200C):pSeries 630 Model 6C4 Rack-mount Server $566.00 566.00
Light Mfg Order indicator - Do Not Build
PCI 4-CHANNEL ULTRA3 SCSI RAtD ADAPTER $2.940.00 5,880.00
CD-ROM Ddve - 48X (Max) IDE $147,00 147.00
36.4 GB 10,000 RPM Ultra3 SCSI Disk Drive Assembly $1,471.00 2,942.00
SCSI Connector Cable $55.00 $ 55.00
Rack Indicator, Rack #1
Power Supply ,645 Watt AC, Hot-Swap, Base and Redundant $1,838.00 $ 3,67600
Redundant Cooling $735.00 $ 735.00
Ultra3 SCSI 4-Pack Hot Swap Back Plane $258.00 $ 258.00
IRS)
~x512MB) SDRAM DIMM Memory,Express Configuration
~ 1.0 GHz POWER4 Processor Card, Express Configuration
Express Configuration - pSeries 630 (200C) indicator $14,886.00 14,886.00
Power Specify for AC
Language Group: US English
POWER CORD SPECIFY 4M - ALL
10/100/1000 Base*T Ethernet PCl Adapter $1,176.00 1,176.00
BM 2104 Storage Sub-System
:)roduct: 1:IBM Expandable Storage Plus - Drawer Model $2.893.00 2.893.00
J Itra3 (LVD) Port. Second Port $311.00 311.00
30war Supply $579.00 1,158.00
3M Ultra3 (LVD) cable S116.oo 232.00
36.4 GB Ultra3 SCSI LVD 10K RPM Ddve $2,195.o0 13,170.o0
Disk Drive Filler
LJ.S. English
5773-AIX SW MAINT 3Y RENEWAL $t,364.00 1,364.00
Back to top $56,635.0~
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
I~ N G I N E E R I N G l~ E PART M E N T
StaffRe rt
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neii, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, AND
FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-54,
SUBMITTED BY CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P., LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, BETVVEEN RICHMOND PLACE AND BUFFALO
AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for DR 99-54 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of DR 99-54, located on the south side of Sixth Street,
between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street
improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council
release the existing Faithful Performance Bond.
Developer: Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P.
3685 Main Street, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92501
Release: Faithful Performance Bond 816585S $47,000.00
Re,,spect¥ ly submit~d, ;.~
WiHiar~. O'Nei[
City Engineer
WJO:LRB
RESOLUTION NO. 02- 2~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-54 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 99-54, have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING I~EPARTMENT
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15911, SUBMI'I-I'ED BY RYLAND HOMES, LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, SOUTH OF VICTORIA
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 15911 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize
the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15911, located on the east side of East Avenue,
south of Victoria, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements
have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful
Performance Bond.
Developer: Ryland Homes
5740 Fleet Street, Suite 200
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Release: Faithful Performance Bond B2983685 $1,211,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond 103737626M $ 121,100.00
Respectfully submitted,
Wil,~i~m J.-O'Neil
City Engineer
Exhibit A (Continued)
~ NORTH ~ 1"= 200'
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: Tract 15911
ENGINEERING DIVISION A - 2 TITLE: Annexation to SLD #1 and SLD #8
RESOLUTION NO. (~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAC-I' 15911 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15911,
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DALE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayer and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer
Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Te~hnician~'~
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. FS1316412 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $13,439.13, FOR THE ARROW ROUTE CROSS GUTTER
REMOVAL AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND HELLMAN AVENUE
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 01-028
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance
Guarantee Bond No. FS1316412 in the amount of $13,439.13 for the Arrow Route Cross Gutter
Removal and Drainage Improvements and Hellman Avenue Drainage Improvements, Contract
No. 01-028.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free
from defects in materials and workmanship.
Contractor: EGN Construction, Inc.
1549 E. Grand Avenue
Pomona, CA 91766
Respectfully submitted,
V1/ql~rl J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JD/RO:Is
Attachments
EXHIBIT "A"
Cross-Gutter
Hellman Avenue
Drainage
ILT&
ARROW ROUTE CROSS, G~ AND.HELl,MAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMEHTS
VICINITY MAP ::
r~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A
F~GINI~I~IN G DI~DAI~TI~I~NT
StaffRepo
SeptemBer ~ g, 2002
TO: Mayor and Membors o[ the City Council
Jack karo, AlGa, City Manager
William ~. O'~oil, City
Jer~ Dyer, Associate fin~ineor ~
Richard Oaxam, fin~ineerin~/e~nician ~
~MO~I OF $~0,452.gg, FOR TH~ ~LMO~D T~lk D~I~AGE
IM~ROVEMfi~T8 FROM BfiRYk STR[fiT TO ~400 FfifiT WIST,
~O. 0~-047
It is mcommonded that tho Ci~ Council authorizo tho Gi~ Glork to releaso Maintenance
Guarantoe Bond ~o. 8470~3~-~ in tha amount of $~0,452.88 for tho.Almond lrail Dmina~o
Improvements from Bo~l Streot to ~400 feet west, Contract ~o. 0~-047.
Tho roquirod one-year maintenance period has endod and the street improvements remain
from Oofects ~n matorials and workmanship.
Contractor: Bonadiman-McGain
2~0 8. lena R~.
San Bomardino, CA ~2408
Respectfully submittod, '
City fin~inoer
Attachments
VICINITY MAp
ALMOND TRAIL DRAINAGE 'IMPROVEMENTS',
FROM BERYL AVE. TO 1400' WEST
-,PROJECT
· * LOCATION
~th 8t
10 Freeway _
~ Fre~w__ay
EXHIBIT "A'
THE CITY OF
I~ANC 1~0 CUCAr, IONCA
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O~eil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECt: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
BOND, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR COYOTE CANYON
PARK LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
RECOMMENDATION
The required landscape improvements at Coyote Canyon Park have been completed in an acceptable
manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements and authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful
Performance Bond in the amount of $89,789.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, the bids for the Coyote Canyon Landscape Improvement project were
received and awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, Megs Way Enterprises. The subject project
has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Landscape Improvements at Coyote Canyon Park by:
CONTRACTOR: Megs Way Enterprises
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape) $89,789.00
Re~p~_ct..~lly submitted,
City Engineer
WJO:JB:dlw
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR COYOTE CANYON PARK
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Coyote Canyon
Park landscape improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work is complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to
sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
9/
R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
ENGINEERING L) E PAR TI*IE N T
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Linda R, Beek, Jr, Engineer
SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,
ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15963, SUBMITTED BY CRESTWOOD
DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONDON AVENUE
AND LIBERTY STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
The required improvements for Tract 15963 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is
recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and
accept a Maintenance Bond.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15963, located on the northwest corner of London
Avenue and Liberty Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The
improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing
Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond.
Developer: Crestwood Development
211 W. Foothill Blvd.
Glendora, CA 91741
Release: Faithful Performance Bond 816454S $320,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Bond 816454S $ 32,000.00
y submitted,
City Engineer
VICINITY MAP
TRACT 15963
JECT
,--, SITE
I! II 11
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO 'SC~
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMOHGA
RESOLUTION NO. O 2- 2 ~' ~2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15963 AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE' OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15963,
have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
TH E CITY OF
]~AN C H 0 C I]CAH 0 N C,A
Staff:Report
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kimberly S. Thomas, Management Analyst II
DATE: September 18, 2002
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City's Participation in a
Local Coalition Representing Local Government Interests in the Matter of
Adelphia Communications' Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council consider and adopt a Resolution authorizing the
City's participation in a local coalition representing local government interests in the
Adelphia Communications' Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. (Adelphia Communications is
the provider of cable service to approximately 2,200 residents in the City). The
formation of a local government coalition will provide cities with the ability to present a
united front in the bankruptcy case, which will enable local governments to exert more
influence over the ultimate terms and conditions under which Adelphia will provide cable
services to subscribers and represent public interests.
BACKGROUND:
Adelphia is under scrutiny by regulators after disclosing $2.3 billion in loans to off
balance sheet partnerships owned by Chairman John Rigas' family. Subsequent to the
original disclosure, the size of the loans has grown to $3.1 billion, and several other
transactions between the company and the Rigas family have been uncovered. The
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and several grand juries are investigating
whether Adelphia properly disclosed the off balance sheet practices, it has been
disclosed that Adelphia had one of the highest debt levels in the cable industry after a
series of acquisitions in the 1990s.
In an attempt to secure its financial stability, Adelphia Communications and more than
two hundred of its subsidiaries, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on June 25,
2002. The Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing may provide time for Adelphia to reorganize
and stabilize its finances. Adelphia has noted that it would continue to provide cable
service to more than 3,500 towns and cities, and that employees would continue to be
paid in the wake of the Chapter 11 filing. Adelphia has stated that it would continue to
operate as usual during bankruptcy proceedings, while working on a reorganization plan
to restructure its debt. Adelphia has arranged a loan of $1.5 billion to help it reorganize
(funding provided by Chase and Citigroup) and to continue to operate. To date the City
has experienced no significant decline in the services received from Adelphia. Adelphia
continues to be responsive to our cable related requests and is current on Franchise
Fee payments.
ANALYSIS:
The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors ("NATOA"), and
the States of California and Nevada Chapter of NATOA ("SCAN/NATOA"), to which the
City is a member, are urging that a coalition of local governments be formed for the
purpose of persuading the Bankruptcy Court that an official committee comprised of
local government entities be formed to protect the interests of local franchising
authorities. If such an official committee were formed, the bankruptcy estate would pay
the professional fees incurred by this committee. This official committee would provide
a viable mechanism to monitor the bankruptcy proceedings in order to protect the
interests of local franchising authorities.
The City Attorney's Office has informed the City that a motion has recently been filed in
the Adelphia bankruptcy proceedings on behalf of the County of St. Port Lucie, Florida,
requesting the creation of an official committee of local franchising authorities. A
hearing on this motion is now scheduled for October 9, 2002. The City Attorney's Office
special bankruptcy counsel, Sulmeyer, Kupetz, Baumann & Rothman, is preparing to
file a "joinder motion" in support of the request by the County of St. Port Lucie.
Sulmeyer, et al., has been retained by the County of Los Angeles to file the joinder
motion, and Los Angeles County is requesting the participation of the local franchising
authorities. The City Attorney's Office is in concurrence, and recommends the passage
of the Resolution to represent the public' interests.
The Sulmeyer firm estimates that the total costs to be incurred in bringing this motion
should not exceed $10,000 and will probably be less. Our City Attorney's Office does
not anticipate that the fees allocable to any local franchising authorities will exceed the
sum of $600. If the Bankruptcy Court acts favorably on the motion, there is a possibility
that one or more of the local coalition members could be appointed to serve on this
official committee, along with the County of Los Angeles.
-2-
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the City's
participation in a local coalition representing local government Interests in the Adelphia
Communications' Adelphia Communications Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing
Respectfully submitted,
Management Analyst II
City Manager's Office
Attachment- Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Supporting the Formation of a Local Coalition of
Government Entities to Protect the Interests of the City and its
Residents During the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceeding
Involving Adelphia Communication Corporation
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. ~)~-~'~'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUPPORTING
THE FORMATION OF A COALITION OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES TO PROTECT THE
INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND ITS RESIDENTS
DURING THE CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ADELPHIA
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
RECITALS:
^. Adelphia Communications Corporation ("Adelphia") is a cable
operator that provides cable service in the City under the authority of a cable
television franchise.
B. In recent months, Adelphia has been impacted by significant
corporate and financial difficulties, including the disclosure of approximately
$3.1 billion in previously undisclosed off-balance sheet obligations, the filing of a
complaint by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the commencement of
two federal grand jury investigations, allegations of widespread corporate fraud,
substantial defaults on bondholder debts, numerous shareholder lawsuits, and
the arrest of five former corporate executives.
C. On June 25, 2002, Adelphia, and more than two hundred of its
subsidiaries, filed for bankruptcy protection.
D. Recent press reports indicate that Adelphia attempted to sell many
of its franchises to other cable operators within the two-week period preceding
the bankruptcy filing, but those negotiations failed.
F_.. Recent press reports indicate that Adelphia has obtained
$1.5 billion in debtor-in-possession financing to continue its cable operations
while the bankruptcy is pending.
F. In the course of the bankruptcy proceedings, Adelphia will be
required to assume or to reject the current franchise agreement with the City, and
during that process the City should play an active role to ensure that all franchise
obligations are satisfied and that the City's cable television subscribers receive
uninterrupted cable television services of the highest quality.
G. Complicated issues are expected to arise during the course of the
bankruptcy that will require: (i) extensive analysis of the rights and obligations of
local governments; (ii) preparation of financial documents and reports explaining
the practical ramifications of various proposals that may arise, including debt and
equity restructurings; and (iii)attention to the protection of the public health,
safety, and welfare, as well as the quality and scope of cable television services
that are provided.
I-[. The bankruptcy proceedings may result in tension between the
following affected parties: local franchising authorities, which are authorized to
manage public rights-of-way and to protect subscribers; Adelphia's creditors,
which desire to obtain maximum value from Adelphia's franchises with minimum
delay; potential asset purchasers, which desire to pay the lowest possible price
and to incur minimum obligations when seeking to buy cable franchises from the
bankruptcy estate; and the bankruptcy court, which desires to quickly administer
the case and to confirm a bankruptcy plan of reorganization.
I. Press reports and other information indicate that Adelphia's
management, as well as Adelphia's major creditors, are currently developing
their respective bankruptcy strategies and forming their committees, none of
which is likely to align with the fundamental objectives of local government with
respect to cable television franchises.
By forming a coalition, local governments can present a united front
in the bankruptcy case, thereby enabling local governments to exert more
influence over the ultimate terms and conditions under which Adelphia, or some
other cable operator, will provide cable services to subscribers on a
going-forward basis.
F,. Bankruptcy law provides, in some circumstances, for the formation
of committees that are comprised of parties sharing similar interests in the
bankruptcy proceeding.
L,. If an official committee comprised of local governmental entities
were appointed by the United States Trustee, the professional fees incurred by
the committee would be paid by the bankruptcy estate.
M. On July12, 2002, the Executive Director of the National
Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors ("NATOA"), and the
President of the States of California and Nevada Chapter of NATOA
("SCAN/NATOA") sent a letter to Adelphia's General Counsel requesting that
Adelphia support the United States Trustee's appointment of a local
governmental committee.
N. On July 31, 2002, the County of St. Port Lucie, Florida, filed a
motion in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
requesting the creation of an official committee of local franchising authorities,
and a hearing date that was originally set for September 17, 2002, has been
continued to October 9, 2002.
O. Qn August 15, 2002, Adelphia's General Counsel responded to the
letter from NATOA and SCAN/NATOA and stated that Adelphia would remain
neutral and would neither support r~or oppose the formation of a local
governmental committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the information set forth above in the Recitals, the
City Council finds and determines that the City will benefit from its participation in
a coalition of cities, counties, and special districts that would act as the local
governmental committee in the bankruptcy proceedings, and would strive to
protect the interests of local franchising authorities and their cable television
subscribers who are impacted by the Adelphia bankruptcy.
Section 2. The City Council expresses its support for the appointment by
the United States Trustee of an official committee of local governmental entities.
Section 3. The City Council authorizes the City's participation in the event
an official committee of local governmental entities is appointed by the United
States Trustee.
Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to the following person:
Mr. Joe Hreha, Deputy Director
Community Services' Department
City of Simi Valley
2929 Tapo Canyon Road
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Section 5. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of September 2002.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
-3-
RANCHO Cll C A H O N GA
ENGINEERING DIVISION / PUBLIC WORKS
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Jeff Barnes, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJF_ITr: REPORT ON VICTORIA WINDROWS POPLAR TREES
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to implement the budgeted removal and replacement of Lombardy Poplar trees
growing in the parkway and landscaped areas along Sugar Gum and Silverberry in the Victoria
Windrows area; and, approve and authorize TruGreen Landcare as the single source vendor for this
project, to be funded from various city accounts not to exceed $75,000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
When the Victoria Windrows development was built in the early 80's, Lombardy Poplar trees were
widely used in several green belt areas. The rapidly growing trees were planted on eight foot centers
within the public right-of-way primarily along the 12300 and 12400 blocks of Sugar Gum St., on the
12300 block of Silverberry St. and in the median island of Victoria Park Lane. Because of their
aggressive nature and damage to the adjacent road, the Poplars planted on Victoria Park Lane were
removed and relocated around the perimeter of Church Park in the late 80's.
The Poplars on Sugar Gum and Silverberry are exhibiting the undesirable characteristics of the
species: extensive and invasive surface rooting. This causes damage to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and
street pavement, and has made it almost impossible to mow turf planted under the trees. These
surface roots also produce "root suckers" that are new little shoots trying to grow into big trees. The
invasion of these stubborn root suckers onto private property has become extensive, and five
homeowners have asked the City to mitigate the problem. The problem is so pervasive that some
back yards are infested to the point that it is impossible to grow grass or other plants, or to keep yard
drains clear. More significantly, some of the homeowners claim that the sucker roots are destroying
their block walls, cracking their patios and even raising the slabs under their homes.
The time has come to re-forest Sugar Gum and Silverberry. Staff recommends the complete removal
and replacement of all of the poplars on Sugar Gum and Silverberry in one operation. These trees are
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JACK LAM, AICP, CITY MANAGER
VICTORIA WINDROWS POPLAR TREES
September 18, 2002
Page 2
aggressive and they are so well established that their removal must be carefully managed in three
steps: chemical treatment, cutting and finally, stump grinding. The timing of the chemical treatment
is of particular importance if the program is to be successful.
Chemical application is necessary to kill the trees and their roots, thereby preventing their
regeneration. The application must be done in the late summer/early fall when the trees are moving
nutrients from their leaves into their roots for winter storage. The stored nutrients are used for the
spring burst of growth. With proper timing, the chemical will move with the nutrients into the tree's
root system. Failure to apply the chemical at just the right time, and/or failure to remove all of trees at
the same time will result in a vigorous re-generation of the tree root systems and the sprouting of
hundreds of destructive shoots and suckers as the trees come out of their dormant phase in the spring.
Personal contact has been attempted with all 37 residents. To date, staff has 31 concurrences, 2 non-
responses, 2 concur with exception, and 2 non-concur. Neighbors stated that the two non-responsive
residents are rarely home and they never see them. The two residents that concur with exception are
renters who concur with the project but forwarded our letters to the homeowners, who have not
responded back. One of the residents who has not concurred stated that he would like to keep the
trees, but if the other residents are in favor, he would agree to the removal. There is only one resident
that has remained adamantly opposed to the removal for aesthetic reasons.
Our plan is to remove the trees (161) this coming fall, during the month of October. In the interim,
we have performed needed trimming for safety reasons and/or removal of some poplars that died due
to old age.
Replacement parkway trees for the removed Poplars will duplicate the species being planted by the
developers to the west, thereby continuing the parkway tree theme. These new trees will be
Brachychitin populneus (Bottle Tree) on Sugar Gum and Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree) on
Silverberry. These two streets currently have Poplars planted within the parkway and the landscaped
area behind the sidewalk. In continuing with the planting pattern of the new developments to the
west, Lagerstroemia indica (Crape Myrtle Tree) will be planted in the landscaped area behind the
sidewalk on the north side of both streets.
Attached are the responses from our mailers, service requests, door hangers, and letters from the
residents.
Respe~t?/all~.~S ubmitted,
City Engi .~er
WJO:JB:ju
Attachments
12447 ]~azing Stat' Court
Rancho Cucamong~, Ca. 91730
January 25, 2502
Mr.Joe 0heal, City Engineer
~05oo Civic Center Drive
Ranc~.o Cucamonga~ Ca, 91730
Dear Mr. Joe Oneal:
It has been since summer of 2001 when I got in touch
with Mt. Joseph Sanchez, Risk Manager of. the City of Ran-
cho Cucamonga, and Mr. Don Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor
of Rancho Cucamonga reg~rdin~ the removal of trees planted
by the city close ~o the fence of our backyard. These
huge trees are continuously d~maging our property~ There
are big crcks, and elevateu parts of the concrete in our
backyard. Our dra/nage was clogged ~eeause of the roots
of the trees. My backyard get flooded when it r~ins~
making the concrete muddy and greenish in color. The roots
of the huge treesget un~r my house going through thefront
yard. Our flooring between the Living room and Kitchen
g~t deformeo ~ecaus~ of the roots of the trees.
Mr. Don Gentry took pictures of.theae damages twice.
We were given a damage form, but we cannot have the esti-
mate done because the trees are still damaging and making
more CraCks in our concrete.
Laet September, 2001, we receive a consent form for
the removal of trees~ between October and November. We
sent back the form right away. Until now, the trees
were not removed yet, although their leaves are already
go~e,
We hope ~hat you will do something ~o expedite the
removal of these trees. There are ne~ cracks forminE
in the concrete of my backyard. Everyday, my husband and
I are worrying that these trees will ruin the whole
flooring of our house.
We would be glad to hear from you soon regarding
this matter,
Respectfully yours,
Mrs. Florinda A. Santos
Tel. No. (909) 899-3026
12447 Blazing Star Court
Rancho Cucamonga~ Ca. 91730
February 7, 2002
Dear Mayor William J. Alexander:
We would like to ask help from you regarding the remov~ul
of trees planted by the city close to the fence of our
backyard.
Enclose is a copy of the letter we sent to the City Engi-
neer of Rancho Cucamonga, and up to now, we never haerd from
him.
Mr. Don Gentry, The Maintenance Supervisor of the city said~
that people did not sign fo r the consent form for the re-
moval of trees. I talked to our neig~.bours, and they said,
that they signed for the consent form.
We donot know why are they giwing us hardships to have
these trees removed. Our neigh~called only once, and
the trees close hy their hackyard fence were beez~ removed.
We are both U.S. Citizens and paying our property tax. Nay
be, because of our color and having acdent, so the city do
not pay attention to our complains.
we are sorry to tell these, but this is what we feel.
Everyday, we have been worrying forthe damages that these trees
are doing to our property. There are new cracks forming
in the concrete of our backyard. We are worried that the
roots of these trees will ruin the whole ~ooring of ou~
house.
Respectfully yours~
Mrs. ~lorinda A. Santos
T H E C T Y 0 F
A NC HO C UC A MO N G /
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
February 28, 2002
Mrs. Florinda A. Santos
12447 Blazing Star Court
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mm. Santos:
Thank you for your letter of Febroasy 7, 2002, regarding trees on your street. It is my
understanding the Poplar trees on your slrect arc cau.~ing a great deal of damage to public and
private improvements. Thc City is reviewing the situation and u'ying to determine thc I~st
method to remove these trees. Yours arc not the only roms involved; there arc n~mny in your
neighborhood that also need removal. It is my understanding the only way to successfully
remove these trees and prevent future problems is to chemically treat them in the fall. Once the
~ have been treated they can be removed. Failure to follow this p~:lure will result in thc
mots spwutin~ new trees, which will continue the problems we have today.
We ask ?-our patience Mrs. Santos in bearing with us as we attempt to solve this problem. Please
als0 be aware many of your neighbors love the ~rees and pm~r they not be removed. City staff
is working with these neighbors to explain the problems with ~ trees and to gain their support
for complete removal in the neighborhood.
Lastly, I assure you all residents of Rancho Cucamonga me treated in exactly the same manner
without regard for race, color or ethnic bank?ound!
I hope I have answered your question regarding removal of trees in your neighborhood. Mrs.
Santos, please if you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact Mr. Dave Blevins, Public
Works Maintenance Manager or Mr. Don G~ntry, Maintenance Supervisor, at (909) 477-2730.
William J. ^lcxan~r
Mayor
c: City Council Members
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Para Easter, Deputy City Manager
Dave Blcvins, Public Works Maintenance Manager
^dministmtive Staff
10500 CivicConter DriYe · P.O. 8ox 807 ,, Roncho Cu¢om~ngc~. CA 91199 ,, (9~9) 477-27011 ,, FAX (909) 47?-2846
August 27, 2002
Daniel Pimentel
12399 Sugargum St.
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
91739
To: Jeff Barnes
(City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.)
Re: Tree and Parkway Project
Good-afternoon,
Just wanted to follow-up regarding our telephone conversation this morning.
At this time, I'm for the removal of the Popla~ trees located on Sugargum St. and
for the replacement of g~ss within the parkways vs. the current ground cover.
I also would prefer to have the city take care of the regular maintenance as
each homeowner would have his/her own concept and maintenance schedule.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the maintenance is billed to each
homeowner through landscape property tax fees.
Thank you for your consideration.
Daniel P. Pimentel
Page 1 of 1
Barnes, Jeff
From: Michael Schaffran
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:56 PM
To: jbemes~ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
Subject: Poplar Removal and Replacement Project
To Whom it may concern:
My name is Michael Schaffran and I am in favor of the Poplar Removal and Replacement Project. I live at 12395
Sugar Gum St. and during the five yearn that I have lived here, the poplar trees have been a nuisance to me.
Problem number one is I think they are ugly, dormant for most of the year. Problem number two is the poplars'
get in my sewer line. I have had roots blocldng my sewer line on three occasions. Problem number three is the
trees destroy my grass. New growths Sprout up from the roots that grow throughout my yard and when I remove
them it will leave a hole. In conclusion, I would definitely like to see an end to Ihe poplar trees stay on Sugar Gum
Street.
8/27/2002
Service Order Request System Page 1 of I
SOR Detail Home 114elp
SOR #t9498
Contact Received on 8/27/2002 9:50:00 AM From Clarinda Valadez
Information Received by Tom Acosta Telephone
Logged by Assigned to Don Gentry
Tom Acosta on 8/27/2002 4:39:17 PM
Location Area Not Available
Street No. 12347 Location description
Street name Thistle Drive Thistle and Carob, backs to Silvcrberry
Problem Problem type 7551 -Irrigation
Details Maintenance-Parkway
Problem description
Priority Routine
Tails trees dropping either., seedlings Notes
sprouting or roots sprouting, killing lawn.
Can City help?
Related to None
Disposition/Response/Action
Response Code 7551 - Imgation
Maintenance-Parkway Actions taken
Date Inspected Tree removals of poplars on Silve~bcrry are awaiting
Return Scheduled Council approval.
Date Completed 8/28/2002
Labor None Equipment: None
Material None
Total Cost $0
View history, of this SOR
http://srv-intra/sor/bin/sorrepo~s.exe 8/28/2002
~ervlce ~raer Kequest ~ystem ~a~e ~ o~ ~
Update Home I Return to Update Pieldist I Help
SOR #6193
Contact Received on 6/18/2001 1:31:00 PM From~~li~
Information Received by gentry Telephone 899-1029
Logged by Assigned to Don Gentry
Don Gentgy on 6/18/2001 1:33:25 PM
Location Ama Not ~tl~e
Street No~
Street name ~ Location description
Problem Problem t~pe 7638 - Parkway Tree Removal
Details Problem description
Roots from trees on SUgargum st. behind Priority Routine
Notes
house are invading back yard.
Related to None
· Del0te this request, mss SOR IS RELATED TO THESE SORS:
· View markup version, [ .... I ....... I ....
· Refer to a contractor or external agency Reaasign to]?On Gentp/
Disposition/Response/Action
Response code I ...... Actions taken
)ate Inspected (m/d/yyyy) [ ~
Return Scheduled (raJd/yyyy) l ....
I I
EmployeeII ou-,lloTllll Equipment Ilnoun
Material ]lQuaatity
http ://srv-intraJsor/bin/SorUpdate. exe 8/27/2002/
5ervme Order Kequest ~ystem ~'age 1 et 2
Update .omc I Retum to Update Pieklist I Help
SOR 06192
Contact Received on 6/18/2001 1:27:00 PM
Information Received by gentry Telephone 899-7823
Logged by
Don Gentry on 6/18/2001 ] :30:$1 PM Assigned to Don Gentry
Location Ama Not v~_le
Street No ~ _~.' ._ _ Location description
roots from trees behind housse on Sugargu:
Street nam~~ are invading back yard.
Problem Problem type 7638 - Parkway Tree Removal
Details Problem description Priority Routine
See above. Notes
Related to None
· Delete this request, THIS SOR IS RELATED TO THESE SORS:
· View markup version, I . I J
· Refer to a contractor or external agency Reassign to ~Don Gentry ~
Disposition/Response/Action
Response code I ..... i Actions taken,
7638- Parkway Tree Removal ~1 ]/~wa±tingear to treat.N°vember - best t£me o1~
Date Inspected (m/d/yyyy) ] ...... /
Return Scheduled (m/d/yyyy) ] .......... ! . ....................
Employee [ Equipment
Material I[~--~
all
......
http ://srwintraJsorPoin/S orlJpdate.exe 8/27/2002/
Service Order Kequest ~ystem ~'age I ox z
Update Home I Return to Update Picklist I Help
SOR ~i944
Contact Received on 6/11/2001 6:23:00 AM From~~
Information Received by gentry Telephone 8992099
Logged by
Don Gentry on 6/11/2001 6:26:49 AM Assigned to Don GentJy
Location Area Not Available
Street No.~.
Street nam~ Location description
Problem Problem type 7638 - Parkway Tree Removal
Details Problem description
Poplar roots from trees on Sugargum are Prioffiy Routine
invading backyard and causing cracks in patio Notes
pad.
Related to None
· Delete this request, THIS $OR IS RELATED TO THESE ~OR$:
· View markup version, I
· Refer to a contractor or external agency Roassign to IDon Gen_t[y
Disposition/Response/Action
Response code I ....... : Actions taken
7638 - Parkway Tree Removal ~ ~waiting November - best time of
............... Ii ear to treat
Date Inspected (m/d/yyyy) ~ :
Return Scheduled (m/d/yyyy) I .....
Equipment
[ Material ][Quanti~
I
http ://srv-intra/sor/bin/SorUpdate. exe 8/27/2002 / [ /
Service Order Request System Page 1 of 2
Update Home [ Return to Update VicklistI Help
SOR O5716
Contact Received on 6/4/;2001 9:4] :00 AM Fro~
Information Received by Melanie Telephone 89~
Logged by
Melanie Williams on 6/4/2001 9:44:38 AM Assigned to Don Gentry
Location
Area Not A~?_ble . Location description
Street No;~ . _ _ Cross Street: South VPWL
Street nam · ~l~l~
Tree on: Sugar Gum & South VPWL
Problem Problem type 7632 - Parkway Tree Inspection
Details Problem description
4 parkway tree roots behind her home have
caused damage to her concrete & the floor of
her home as well. Priority Routine
Notes
Also tree roots on the front and side of her
home.
Related to 5536 Parkway Tree Removal
Call back requested
THIS SOR IS RELATED TO THESE SORS:
· Delete this request, ]55as ] ................. ]
· View markup version,
· Refer to a contractor or external agency Reassign to ID~n Gentry
Disposition/Response/Action
Response code I .... Actions taken
17632-Pa~wayTree Inspection ~,! ~waiting November - best time of
....... ~.a [year to treat .
Date Inspected (m/d/yyyy) [ ....
Return Scheduled (m/d/yyyy) [ ..-
Em II-ou~lloTI I Equipment
http://srv-intra/sor/bin/S orUpdate, exe 8/27/2002//2
Update Home [ Return to Update Pioklist [Help
SOR ~577
Contact Received on 5/29/2001 4:16:00 PM
Information Received by Anthony Albano Telephone' ' ' ~hm. 4'~ wk. 899-2531
Logged by
Anthony Albano on 5/29/2001 4:22:10 PM Assigned to Don Gentnj
I.,e,tiou ^reaNot e
Street No.~~j;~Et~ Location description
Street name. (ON SUGARGUM)
Problem Problem t~pe 8004 - Contract Inspection
Details Problem description
Resident concerned with roots from Priority Routine
Lombardy Poplars (on Sugargum) lifting her Notes
patio.
Related to 5536 Parkway Tree Removal
THIS SOR IS RELATED TO THESE SORS:
· Delete this request, Is536
· View markup version,
· Refer to a contraotor or external agency Reassign to ID0n Gent~
Disposition/Response/Action
Response code ] ..... i Actions taken
is0o~:c~a~?peeo~ ~ea~£ng bes~- time of year to
Date Inspected (m/d/yyyy) I _ _ :
Return Scheduled (m/d/yyyy) [ ....
Equipment
Material [IQuantit~
....
II
http://srv-intraffsor/bin/SorUpdate.exe 8/27/2002/
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U C AM-O N G A
September 5, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staffhas reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in oar atte~t to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not horc~, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your respouse at~er normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J, Alexander ~.~-:~-.~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive - P. O. Box 807 ° Rahcho Cucamonga. CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www,ci,rancho cucamonga,ca,us /
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U C AM 0 N G A
September 5, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streem.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our att~,t to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~,,~vted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have let~ this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response at, er normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~.~.~'-¢~-..~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayar Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dulton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 * Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 * (909) 477 2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www,ci,rancho-cucamonga,ca.us //5
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO C U CA M 0 N G k
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~ted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have lett this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses ean be
tallied, and a de~ision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J, Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Dullon
Jack Lam, AICR City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www,ci.rancho-cucamonga,ca,us /
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CU C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
propeay damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staffhas reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our att~t to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have lei~ this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response al~er normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~f~.~""~-.~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob DuHon
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CouncJlmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga,ca, us //7
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U CAM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.*
Last October, you received a letter fi'om the City regarding the removal and replacement
of ali the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverbetry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staffhas reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses fi'om 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have lett this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response at, er normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
talfied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J, Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dufton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 * (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www,ci.rancho-cucamonga,ca.us
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO C U CAM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in oar att~ut to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of cousensus. Today, we
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project wffi commence this October.
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander q~.~-.~ Councilmember Paul Bione
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P, O, Box 807 * Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us, //~
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Sweets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
propexty damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staffhas reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~t~ted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engine~. 'mg Divan, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayar Pra-Tem Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curataio
10500 Civic Center Drive * P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477 2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
,
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
7o(o'7
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a l~tter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Sweets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staffhas reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residems to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~,~,led personally comact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
haug~r requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would h'ke to register your response at%r normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses cmn be
tamed, and a decision made as to whether this project will eommenee thi~ October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councllmember Bob Dulton
Jack Lam, AICP, Ci~ Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9~729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
/2/
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO CU C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attemlJt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact allresidents to achieve the goal ofconsensns. Today, we
atte~,~ted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have lett this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response af[er normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please enntaet us as soon as possible, so that responses eon be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project wffi commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J, Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Blanc
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucomongo, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga.ca,us
, 172
~ H E C I T Y 0 F
C II 0 C U CA 0 C A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Siiverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
atto~ied personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as pnssible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ~ ~ ~~
Engineering Division, Public Works Ma/ntenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~.~"~-..~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dulfi'on
Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager Coundilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive * P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 * (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
/25
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U CAM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT IJS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverben'y and Sugar Gum .Stre.ets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~nqJted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tamed, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~.~-~-~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive * P, O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 * (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga,ca.us
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO C U CAM 0 N G A
August 26,2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensas. Today, we
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response atter normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dul~on
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Ddve · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 * (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga,ca.us
"
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO CU C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverbeny and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses f~om 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staffto again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~,~uted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Worl~ Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~,.~-..~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive * P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477 2849
www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
T H E C I T V 0 F
RANCHO C U C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all thc poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attr~:~ut to gain comensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project wffi commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICE City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga,ca.us
/27
'T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO C U CAM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding thc removal and replacement
of all thc poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents arc experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed thc various concerns and con~laints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve thc goal of consensus. Today, wc
attempted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have leR this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would lflcc to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as poss~le, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EnginT~ing Division, Pu~aintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander q~_~'?~-~-~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Ddve · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucomonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www,ci.rancho-cucamonga,ca.us
. I28
T H E C I T Y 0 F
RANCHO C U CA M 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter f~om the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverberry and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our atte,~ut to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
atte~,~cd personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have let~ this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180, Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
talBed, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence thin October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Enginee~ng Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 * Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca,us
T H E C I T Y O F
R'A N C H0 C U CAM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of alt the popla~ trees wowing in the parkways along Silverberty and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staffhas reviewed the various concerns and co~laints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our att~ml~t to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
att~t~ted personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have let*/this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at 477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after nomml business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William J. Alexander ~L~'~'-~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tem Diane Williams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICR City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 Civic Center Drive · P. O. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849
www,ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
T H E C I T Y O F
RANCHO C U C AM 0 N G A
August 26, 2002
Dear Resident:
PLEASE CONTACT US AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!
Last October, you received a letter from the City regarding the removal and replacement
of all the poplar trees growing in the parkways along Silverbeaxy and Sugar Gum Streets.
These trees are to the rear or front of your property. Many residents are experiencing
property damage associated with these trees and have asked the City to remove and
replace them with a more appropriate, non-invasive tree species.
Over the past year, City staff has reviewed the various concerns and complaints regarding
the removal and replacement of these trees. We contacted 37 residents and received
responses from 24 in our attempt to gain consensus for the project. City management has
requested staff to again contact all residents to achieve the goal of consensus. Today, we
attempled personally contact with you. Since you were not home, we have left this door
hanger requesting that you telephone us at477-2730, ext. 0 to register your response. If
you would like to register your response after normal business hours, please call 477-
2730, ext. 4180. Please contact us as soon as possible, so that responses can be
tallied, and a decision made as to whether this project will commence this October.
Thank you,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division, Public Works Maintenance Section
Mayor William d. Alexander ~ Councilmember Paul Biane
Mayor Pro-Tern Diarte Williams Councilmember Bob Dutton
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Councilmember Grace Curatalo
10500 CMc Center Drive · P, O, Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 * (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849
www.ci,rancho-cucamonga.ca,us
/5/
Pop,ar Trees
Existi~9 poF
,g poplars on
come~ of
and
and
Excavated roots from poplars on Sugargum St, h~ backyard of 12437'
Tree
F~ opo~,ed, ~-p ace~T~e~ , tree for
The Msidenhal~ .... ' ~':
~lee, Ginkgo
r~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A
CO~ IINI'PY c~l~l~VICl~&
Staff Report
DATE: September 18, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer
BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill
Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner
SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
UPDATE
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation
facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent
issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services D,._epartment and the
Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering.
A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE
Day Creek Park (Previously, Rancho Etiwanda Park):
· Backstops are being installed; topsoil has been delivered and is being placed. Restroom is
underway.
South Etiwanda Park:
· Landscape Architect is beginning conceptual design plans.
Central Park:
· Engineering staff is working with the consultant in coordinating utility placement and related
street improvements. Amhitect is preparing schematic drawings.
East Beryl Park:
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
· Tot Lot drain lines are in place. Contractor is beginning to pour the footings for the walls.
Restroom roof underlayment has been installed.
Golden Oak Park:
· Ball field netting is scheduled to be installed to prevent balls from flying into the yards of
Park neighbors and causing a hazardous condition for children.
Red Hill Community Park:
· Community Service Department's Rancho Nights and Movies in the Park continued to be
popular with increasing attendance. Park staff remained busy with setup, trash pickup, rest
room monitoring and teardown of these events. Both of these events concluded at the end
of August.
B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
Senior Services:
· Hospitality Bar-B-Q Dinner - Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 5:00 p.m. This popular
activity returns in September to help acquaint new seniors to the Center.
· The annual VIP Club Picnic will be held at Red Hill Community Park on Thursday,
September 19, 2002.
· Senior Billiards Tournament., October 11, 2002, 9:00 a.m. Rack 'em upi The Senior Center
is hosting a senior billiards tournament. This double elimination tournament will feature
refreshments, cash prizes and great play. The tournament is limited to the first 16
participants. Cost is $5 per person.
The Autumn Leaves Fashion Show will be held at the Senior Center on Saturday, October
12, at 10:00 a.m. Don't miss this spectacular event that is co-sponsored by the V.I.P. Club.
A light salad luncheon will be served and you will get an up-close look at new fashions for
fall and winter seasons. Tickets are $5 per person.
· The next regular meeting of the Senior Advisory Committee will be held on Monday,
September 23, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center.
· The Senior Center will offer yo,qa classes starting this fall.
· World Estate Plannin,q is sponsoring a monthly financial planning workshop at the Senior
Center beginning in September. The first workshop topic, scheduled for September 18,
2002, will be, What to Do with Your IRA When the Market is Down".
· The Senior Center will offer a stained qlass class beginning in the fall. The time and day of
the class is yet to be determined.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
Human Services:
· The date for the upcoming Flu Clinic has been changed from October 26th, to Friday,
November 8th, from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. The County was unable to guarantee when
inoculations could be available from them therefore, San Antonio Hospital will again
administer the program this year.
· Breathe Easy - The Orchard Plaza Therapy Clinic will offer a free monthly Breathe Easy
Workshop. The workshop will cover areas in diaphragmatic breathing, exercise tolerance
and pulmonary rehabilitation. This workshop is offered every 3r~ Tuesday of the month from
10:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m.
· Mana.qin.q Your Health - The San Bernardino County Public Health Nurses will present a
free six-week workshop on Managing Your Health. Areas to be covered include: muscle
relaxation, identifying health problems and goal setting. This multi-week workshop will run
every other Friday from September 20th through November 15th from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00
a.m.
· 55 Alive Driving Class - Classes are offered every first Tuesday and Wednesday of the
month. Times alternate between morning and evening hours. This drivers retraining course
developed by AARP offers discount insurance certificates upon completion.
· A.qeWise - An outreach program for healthy aging. The goal of the AgeWise program is to
provide free in-home counseling to older adults to help maintain the best possible physical
and mental health. Services include: senior peer counseling, support groups and
educational classes. For more information .call I 800 451-5633. Monday - Friday, 8:00
a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
· Senior Employment Counselinq - The Senior Employment Program sponsored by The
Department of Aging & Adult Services will offer free job counseling and training to qualified
seniors 55 and older every second & fourth Thursday of the month. 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
by appointment only
· Safe Return Proqram - The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center is an official site for the
Alzheimer's Association Safe Return Program. The Safe Return Program assists in the safe
and timely return of individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia who wander
away from home and become lost.
· Health Screenings - Provided by nurses from The San Bernardino County Department of
Public Health free health assessments, i.e., blood pressure, height, weight and hemoglobin
testing are offered at the Senior Center. Counseling and referrals are also available the
second Tuesday of the month 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
· Elder Law Matters - Attorney Gregory Wood offers free elder law counseling every second
Friday of the month from 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m. by appointment only. Attorney Wood also
offers free legal seminars every 4th Friday of the month at the Senior Center starting at 12:00
noon.
City Council
Parks; Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
· USDA Food Commodities - Surplus food commodities are distributed on the first Monday of
each month to eligible Iow-income residents of Rancho Cucamonga from 1:30 p.m. until
3:00 p.m. or until commodities are gone. A limited homebound program is available for
physically disabled individuals and seniors. Proof of income and residency is required.
· Senior Gasoline Service Pro.qram - Various gas stations throughout Rancho Cucamonga will
provide assistance in pumping gas to seniors 60 years and older. Sign-ups are necessary
and a certificate is required.
Trips and Tours:
· Solvanq, September 21,2002. Danish Days in Solvang. Step into this quaint Danish village
and enjoy all the sights, sounds and scents that surround you. Enjoy the day at your leisure
as you explore the Scandinavian import shops and bakeries of Solvang.
· The Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace, October 5, 2002. The 9-acre Library and
Birthplace is a three-dimensional walk-through memoir featuring a 52,000 square foot
museum, 22 high-tech galleries, movie and interactive video theatres, the spectacular First
Lady's Garden, the President's faithfully restored 1910's birthplace and the flower-ringed
memorial sites of President and Mrs. Nixon.
· Guys and Dolls at the Lawrence Walk Resort. The Senior Center is offering a trip to see
Guys and Dolls and enjoy a fabalous buffet lunch, on Saturday, October 19, 2002. The cost
is $55.00 per person including transportation, lunch and the show.
· The Getty Center, November 2, 2002. The Getty Center tour begins with a tram ride to the
summit, taking in unexpected views of the historic Sepulveda Pass. At the museum you can
watch a brief orientation film. From there you are free to experience all the Getty has to
offer at your own pace.
· Rose Parade, January 1, 2003. Enjoy the world famous Rose Parade from premium
grandstand seats along Colorado Blvd.
· Palm Sprin,qs Follies, January 25, 2003. The fabulous Palm Springs Follies is a three-hour
razzle-dazzle, song and dance vaudeville-style extravaganza showcasing the music and
dance of the 30's and 40's. Each cast member is 55 to 88 years of age. Don't miss this
incredible show.
Volunteer Services:
· The new Volunteer Program brochure has just been completed and will shortly be printed for
distribution,
· Staff is currently recruitin.q volunteers for the Founders Day Parade and Celebration and the
State Farm Golf Tournament.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
· The table below summarizes CSD volunteer usa,qe for the month of July 2002 and year to
date.
Month: July 2002 YEAR TO DATE
# of # of Hours :)ollar Value # of # of Dollar Value
Volunteers Volunteers Hours
~,dmin 5 1 .c $21 {; 3(~123 $1,72-~
Sports 57 769 10,76(~ 1,753 17,964 $251,49~
Sr & Human 43 339 $4,74~ 393 2,639 $36,94(
Services
Special 14 40 $56(: 207 2,386 $33,40z
Events
Youth 32C 1,400 $19,60(: 75~ 5,991 $85,076
Programs
*Dollar value based on $14.00 per hour.
Teens:
· During the month of August through mid-September, 993 youngsters attended the Teen
Center. As the school year progresses the Teen Center number will continue to increase.
· One hundred and eighty-eight (188) youngsters used the Teen Center homework room
during the month of August through mid-September.
· The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC), twice-monthly babysitting service Night on the
Town had ninety (90) youngsters at their program during the month of August through mid-
September.
· Over 40 TRAC teens participate in our monthly meetings. Total number of TRAC members
participating in City programs from August through mid-September was 48 youth.
· Forty-one (41) youngsters participated in our Teen Learnin,q Center (TLC) program for the
summer, The teens had a great time learning job responsibilities and performing duties as
assigned by staff.
· The Spruce Park Skate Facility usage during the month of August was estimated at 900
skaters. Staff is making regular weekly visits to the skate park to promote safe skating by
handing out donated chips and beverages to those youngsters wearing their proper gear.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
Youth Activities:
· Playschool Classes are filling up quickly for our fall session. Currently we have over 560
youngsters registered into classes at our four locations, Lions East, Lions West, Hillside
Community Church and the Mulberry Early Learning Center.
· The Mobile Recreation Program, Fun on the Run had a great summer. The program served
over 1,250 youth for the period of August through mid-September. Mobile Recreation has
three (3) rentals scheduled during the reporting period. During the fall the Recreation Unit
will go to the following park sites:
Weekday Park Location Program Time
Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Tuesday/ Old Town Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Wednesday Hermosa Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Thursday Mountain View Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Friday Windrows Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm
Grants:
· The Teen Connection staff was very busy this summer planning and organizing activities for
the high schools starting in September. This school year Los Osos High School is added to
the list of school to visit at lunchtime. The table below summarizes the schedule of visits for
this school year.
Weekday High School
Monday Los Oso High School
Tuesday Etiwanda High School
Wednesday Rancho Cucamonga High School
Thursday Alta Loma High School
· Youth Enrichment Services (YES) - Attendance at our FACTS Centers is increasing at both
the Mulberry Early Learning Center and the Lions East Community Center. For the period
of August through the mid-September, 2,065 community members visited the Lions East
FACTS Center and 1,084 visited the Mulberry FACTS Center. For the same time frame an
estimated 210 parents attended parent education classes offered through the grant. Staff
has also performed over 60 car safety inspections for parents during the reporting period.
Classes:
· Fall session contract classes began on Saturday, September 7th. Currently we have over
1,100 participants registered into our contract classes for the fall session.
Youth Sports:
· The table on the next page summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period:
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Pee Wee Baseball 610 3-5/boys & girls 61
Pee Wee Soccer 429 3-5/boys & girls 43
Summer Youth Basketball 775 6-15/boys & girls 88
Youth Sports Camp 180 6-12/boys & girls N/A
Youth Volleyball Camp 30 8-12/boys & girls N/A
Fall Youth Roller Hockey 160 6-15/boys & girls 20
Fall Youth Volleyball 40 8-13/girls 4
Fall Youth Flag Football 199 6-13/boys & girls 16
RC Family Sports Center:
· The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting
period:
Activity # of Participants
Adult Basketball 383
, Youth Basketball 537
Adult Racquetball 333
Youth Racquetball 91
Adult Volleyball 32
Youth Volleyball 8
Jazzemise 1,173
· The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the
reporting period:
Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams
Adult Racquetball 18 Adult/Males N/A
Adult Basketball (full court) 120 Adult/Males 12
Adult Basketball (3-on-3) 40 Adult/Males 8
Adult Sports:
· Five adult softball tournaments took place during the month August at the Epicenter and
Adult Sports Complex.
· The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period:
Activity I # of Participants # Teams I Gender
Softball 2,400 150 Male/Female
Soccer 864 50 Male/Female
Flag Footba 40 4 Male
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
Non-Profit Sports Organizations:
· Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee
allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport iea.ques. For the reporting period,
11 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 261,501 participants and
spectators enjoying our parks.
Community Wide Special Events:
· Over 5,000 residents came out to enjoy our free movies in our Movies in the Park program.
This summer's lineup for movies included: Harry Potter, Atlantis: The Lost Empire,
Monsters/nc., Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, Cats & Dogs, and Shrek. Movies were held at
Milliken Park on Monday evenings, Windrows Park on Wednesday evenings and Red Hill
Park on Friday evenings over the summer.
· Concerts in the Park this year was combined with a new element, Rancho Niqhts:
Communi~ Marketplace. This 12-week program ran every Thursday from June 6th through
August 29" at the Red Hill Community Park amphitheater area. The public response was
terrific. The community loved the hand crafted items for sell, a few farmer's sold fruits and
vegetables and over 10 food vendors were available to choose from for dinner. The lineup
of entertainment was an exciting one filled with great music for all to enjoy! Our free
concerts had the crowds of over 2,200 people per night (a total of 26,400 for the 12-week
program) up dancing and enjoying the beautiful Rancho Cucamonga summer nights!
· The Founders Day Parade and Celebration is the next big event heading our way. The fun
happens on November 9th with the kickoff of the traditional parade and celebration at Red
Hill Community Park. The parade begins at 9:30 a.m. and the celebration begins at 10:00
a.m. The parade will have lots of innovative and colodul floats and the celebration will have
tons of fun for the entire family. This event will kick off the City's 25t~ anniversary celebration
and will feature the theme, Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence.
· Family Entertainment Series: Comedy Circus - On August 17th at the Epicenter Stadium, the
Family Entertainment Series proudly presented Comedy Circus. Nearly 1,200 community
members enjoyed an evening at the Epicenter featuring a line up of family oriented comedy
and fun.
· The Spirit of America - Wednesday, September 11, 2002, 7:30 p.m. Alta Loma High School
Auditorium. An evening of stunning patriotic music featuring the renowned Windsong
Southland Chorale, in remembrance of the victims of September 11t~. When this report was
prepared the event had not taken place; attendance numbers will be reflected in the October report to
Council.
· The Special Event Division is working on the State Farm Open Golf Tournament that is
scheduled for September 21-30t~ at Empire Lakes.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
Cultural and Performing Arts:
· The City's summer musical The Pa/ama Game was a delightful production that featured 82
local youth. The show was presented at Alta Loma High School on July 26 - 28 and August
2 - 4. A number of large production numbers filled the stage with singing and dancing
youngsters and kept the cast excited about performing in theater. Approximately 1,400
audience members attended over the 6-performance run and generated over $18,000 in
ticket sales, participant fees, ad sales and concessions. This was the second production
directed by Barbara Hinrichsen and her team, following the very successful Sound of Music
this past spring. Barbara will return to direct again next spring.
· In addition to existing programs for performing arts, two new workshops are being added.
Intro to Theater, taught by our community theater director Barbara Hinrichsen has a full-
roster of students, eager to take this 5-week course on Tuesday nights, beginning on
September 10t~, Another new workshop is the Youth Theatre Workshop and Performance.
This is a 8-week program for youngsters age 6-11 to learn about how to put on a play. A
short production will be staged for family and friends upon the conclusion of the program.
Taught by Allison Dugan, this new program will take place at Alta Loma High School.
· The RC Performance Troupe, a group of 20 youth ranging in age from 10-16 has been
formed following an open audition and is now in rehearsal to prepare a 15-20 minute
musical presentation for community events and other local activities. The troupe will
represent the City's performing arts and will be available to perform at local events and
private functions. Headed by Keely Milliken (vocal director) and Alison Hooper
(choreographer) the troupe members will receive 10 weeks of instruction and direction each
quarter to prepare a medley of musical numbers for public presentation. Each quarter a
new selection of musical numbers will be added to their repertoire.
Parks and Facilities:
· The table below provides information on park/special use facility reservations for the month
of August 2002:
Location Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use
Applications Processed of
Rentals
Red Hill 2,960 49 59 236
Community Park
Heritage Community 1,095 20 22 91
Park
Hermosa Park 305 12 12 57
Coyote Canyon Park 222 7 11 24
Civic Center 650 2 2 15
Courtyard
Amphitheater 100 1 I 2
Equestrian Center 100 3 3 10
Total 5~432 94 110 435
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
Heritage Park Equestrian Center:
· Equestrian Center usaqe for the months of September and October 2002 is shown in the
table below;
Group Date Event/Time Frame
Alta Loma Riding Club September 5t~ Board Meeting/7:30p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
4-H Club September 7tn Horse Exhibition and Dinner/3:00p.m.-10:00p.m.
Rising Stars of September 15tn Dressage Schooling Show/8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Equestrian Therapy
4-H Club September 16~ General Meeting/7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Alta Loma Riding Club September 17~h General Meeting/6:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.
Llama Association SCA October 5tn 8:00a.mJ5:00 p.m.
Rising Stars of October 12~ Regional Disabled Show/8:00a.m./5:00p.m.
Equestrian Therapy
Alta Loma Riding Club October 15tn General Meeting/7:00p.m.-9:30p.m.
4-H Club October 21st General Meeting/7:00p.m.-9:00p.m.
4-H Club October 26t~ Halloween Horse Show/7:00a.m.-5:00p.m.
Park and Recreation Commission:
· The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission will take place on September 19,
2002. At this meeting the Commission discuss/act upon the following items:
~ Senior Advisory Committee update.
~, Sports Advisory Committee update.
~. Status of legislative efforts for Senior Center Project.
~ Update on proposed Central Park project.
~. Update on proposed Cultural Center project.
~ Review of proposed design for Victoria Arbor Park.
> Discussion regarding Commissioners participation the Founder's Day Parade and
Celebration to be held on November 9, 2002.
~ Discussion regarding Silver Award Bridge Project for a local park.
~ Review of application process for Senior Advisory Committee.
~ Consideration of possible waiver or rescheduling of Regular Park and Recreation
Commission meeting scheduled for October 17, 2002.
~ Update on skate park legislation.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
· The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Foundation's Se tember 10 2002
meetin.q:
~ Update on proposed Cultural Center project.
~ Approval of fund descriptions.
~ Consideration of support of a Sister City Program for Rancho Cucamonga.
City Council
Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update
September 18, 2002
> Follow up session regarding Board development.
· Staff is in the process of preparing an Proqram Hi.qhliqhts Report that summarizes the
activities of the Foundation for the past year.
Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter:
· The following activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period:
Vons - CEO/Celebrity Softball Game - Epicenter Stadium - September 6, 2002,
AYSO - Picture Day- Epicenter Soccer Fields - September 7, 2002.
Rancho Cucamonga/Fontana Family YMCA - Classic Car Show- Epicenter Special
Event Area - September 7, 2002.
· Staff is working with the following organizations for future/tentative bookin,qs at the
Epicenter:
> Active Ride Shop - Skate Demonstration and Concert - Epicenter Special Event
Area - September 27, 2002.
> Relief RX - Commercial Filming - Epicenter Stadium - End of September 2002.
> Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - Grape Harvest Festival - October 2-
7, 2002.
· Staff is in the process of developing a 5-minute Epicenter marketinq video of the facility.
This piece will provide potential users/renters of the facility with an up close look at all of
the amenities that the facility has to offer. Copies of the video will be available in both
CD and VHS format and will also be loading onto the Epicenter's website.
· Staff is working to audit and refine the Epicenter website to enhance its user friendliness.
Resp~ ~tfully submitted,
Kevi~' /lcArdle
Community Services Director eer
I:lCOMMSERV~Council&Boards~Ci~yCounciltStaffRepor~st2OO2tupdateg. 18.02. doc