Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/10/25 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 25, 2000 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel__ Vice Chairman Macias__ Com. Mannerino__ Com. Stewart__ Com. Tolstoy__ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS II1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Adjourned Meeting September 13, 2000 October 11,2000 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voic~ their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-38 MODIFICATION - CLUR MATRIXX - A request to expand the hours of operation for a nightclub and restaurant within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-101-23. (Continued from October 11, 2000) WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT - ITEM WILL NOT BE HEARD B. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 97-04 MODIFICATION - CLUB MATRIXX - A request to modify conditions of approval regarding hours of operation, entertainment uses, and ages of patrons for a nightclub and restaurant within the Thomas Winery Plaza, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-101-23. (Continued from October 11, 2000) WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT - ITEM WILL NOT BE HEARD C. TIME EXTENSION FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 - DIVERSI FI ED PACI FIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP - A request for an extension of a previously approved residential subdivision for condominium purposes and design review for the development of 153 detached condominium units on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts (8-14 and 14-24 dwelling units per acre, respectively), located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-691-01 Related File: Variance 94-05. The Planning Commission approved a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts December 8, 1999. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR VARIANCE 94-05 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT - A request for an extension of a previously approved variance to reduce the required minimum building separation from 15 feet to 8 feet and to increase the distance for the closest visitor parking space from a dwelling unit from maximum of 150 feet to 240 feet for a proposed 153- unit detached condominium project on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts (8-14 and 14-24 dwelling units per acre, respectively) located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue APN: 0227-691-01. Related File: Vesting Tentative Tract 15477. E. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15518 - HOGLE IRELAND - The proposed subdivision of 7.9 acres into 5 parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located at the northwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN- 229-111-06. Related file: Development Review 99-75. V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS F. AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Community Commercial for an approximately 8,000 square foot parcel, located approximately 450 feet south of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-211-05. Related file: General Plan Amendment 99-06A. G. ROOFING MATERIALS Page 2 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS H. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS (Oral Report) VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 (AMERICAN BEAUTY) AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-34 (COSTCO WHOLESALE). I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 19, 2000, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission October 25, 2000 r Hillside ~ ! I Banyan 19th/210 Fw , O laseline 'A, Foothill Arrow I 4th 0 and H are CI'P~IDE City of Rancho Cucamonga A CITY HALL IN THE CITY OF I~AN CI~ 0 ClICAHONGA Staff Report DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Chairman and Membem of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97,38 MODIFICATION - CLUB MATRIXX- A request to expand the hours of operation for a nightclub and restaurant within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-101-23. (Continued from September 27, 2000) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 97-04 MODIFICATION - CLUB MATRIXX -A request to modify the conditions of approval regarding hours of Operation, entertainment uses, and ages of patrons for a nightclub and restaurant within the Thomas Winery Plaza, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-101-23. (Continued from September 27, 2000) BACKGROUND: This project was scheduled to be heard at the October 11, 2000, Planning Commission meeting but staff received a telephone call from the applicant on October 11 indicating a desire to withdraw the application. The Planning Commission continued the matter to tonight's meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to submit a formal written request to withdraw the application. The applicant has submitted the written request (Exhibit "A"); therefore, no further action is required by the Commission. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter of Withdrawal Dated October 13, 2000 ITEMS A & B TO: NANCY F'ONG 10/13/O0 Ae=SIBTANT PLANNER FROM: RON I~OZARTH CLUB MATRIXX NANCY, THIS IS TO NOTIFY YOU THAT I AM WITHDRAWING THE APIaLICA'I'ION TO MODIFY ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT #97-04 AND CONI:)ITIONAL PERMIT #97-38. THE CITY OF J~AN CI1 0 (.J [JCAM ON CA DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXII:NSION FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP - A request for an extension of a previously approved residential subdivision for condominium purposes and design review for the development of 153 detached condominium units on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts (8-14 and 14-24 dwelling units per acre, respectively) located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-691-01. Related File: Variance 94-05. The Planning Commission approved a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts December 8, 1999. TIME EXTENSION FOR VARIANCE 94-05 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP - A request for an extension of a previously approved variance to reduce the required minimum building separation from 15 feet to 8 feet and to increase the distance for the closest visitor parking space from a dwelling unit from a maximum of 150 feet to 240 feet for a proposed 153-unit detached condominium project on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts (8-14 and14-24 dwelling units per acre, respectively), located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 0227-691-01. Related File: Vesting Tentative Tract 15477. .BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract 15477 was approved by the Planning Commission on November 9, 1994, with a two-year expiration date. In 1996, the State granted a twelve-month automatic time extension pursuant to Assembly Bill 771. This extended the expiration of the subject Vesting Tentative Tract to November 9, 1997. Subsequently, staff approved an extension for the Vesting Tentative Tract and Variance for one year to November 9, 1998. The Planning Commission approved two more one-year time extensions in December 1998 and December of 1999. The current expiration date is November 9, 2000. ITEMS C & D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT vq-r 15477 & VAR 94-05 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC DEV. GP. October 25, 2000 PAge 2 ANALYSIS: A. Subdivision Map: The City's Subdivision Ordinance (RCMC 16.16.070) provides that the Planning Commission may grant time extensions in twelve-month increments for up to five years (a maximum of eight years from the original approval). The one-year automatic time extension granted by the State is in addition to the time extensions, which may be granted by the City; therefore, the maximum life of this project would be up to nine years from the original approval (final expiration on November 9, 2003). Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with current development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based upon this review, Vesting Tentative Tract 15477 meets the development standards for the Medium and Medium-High Residential Districts. Staff recommends granting another a twelve- month time extension to November 9, 2001. B. Development/Desiqn Review and Variance: The original approval for the Matreyek Trust project also included design review for construction of condominium units on the lots and variances to reduce building separation and increase the minimum distance required for the closest visitor parking space. The time extension of design reviews and variances is regulated by the City's Development Code. The Development Code was amended by Ordinance No. 596 to grant a five- year approval period with no possible time extensions. The one-year automatic time extension granted by the State is in addition to the time extensions, which may be granted by the City. Therefore, the maximum approval period, including State extensions, would be six years from the original approval. Therefore, no further time extensions are allowed. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A previous Environmental Assessment was completed in November of 1999. The conditions in the area have not changed appreciably since the Vesting Tentative Tract received approval on November 9, 1994. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year time extension for the subdivision map for Vesting Tentative Tract 15477 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:EW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Time extension Letters dated June 18, 1996, and September 15, 1997 Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations and Floor Plans Resolution of Approval ~c~L ~ c~ DIVERSIFIED DEVELOPMENT GROUP L.L.C. August 31, 2000 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Depmhnent 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: 20.15 acres NEC Baseline Road and Milliken Avenue Extension of Tentative Tract No. 15477 Dear Mr. Buller: DPDG Fund III, LLC, a California limited liability company, is currently the owner of the 20.15 acres at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road, formerly owned by the Matreyek Trust. This property is the subject of the approved Tentative Tract Map referenced above which expires on November 9, 2000. As you are aware, we are currently processing some changes and revisions to the existing project layout. Our new concept for the property has been received positively by the Planning Commission and planning staff. While we are processing for entitlements for ou~ new project, we would request an extension for one year of the existing approval for the referenced Tentative Tract Map. We understand that, if our new subdivision should be approved by the Planning Commission, the provisions of the existing Tentative Tract Map will be superceded by any new approvals. An extension of the current approvals permits us to protect the entitlements on the property, in the interim. We believe that those entitlements still are in general compliance with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We enclose our check in the amount of $1,214.00 in payment of the filing fee for this request. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, DPDG FUND III, LLC By: Diversified Pacific Development Group, LLC, its Managing Member///~ / ! ~-By: ~'Ma/~ Jord~l~anaging Member Telephone 1909} 48t-1150 FAX {909~ 481-1154 T H E C ~ T Y 0 ,c DA NC HO C UCA b'fONGz\ June 18, 1996 Mr. Tom Matreyek Matreyek Homes 655 N. Mountain Avenue Upla. nd, CA 91786 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 Dear Applicant: In response to the severe impact of the recession on developers, the Legislature recently amended the Subdivision Map Act by Assembly Bill 711 (Aguiar). This bill extends by 12 months the expiration date of any tentative subdivision and parcel map that had not expired on or before Ma~y 14, 1996. This extension is in addition to any other extension as provided for in the Map Act. Therefore, the new expiration date for your project is as follows: File # New Expiration Date: 'ir 15477 November 9, 1997 AB 771 also extends any Conditional Use Permit or DevelopmentJDesign Review application granted in conjunction with your tentative subdivision map. The extensions granted by AB 771 are automatic; no application for extension or fee is necessary. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at (909) 477-2750. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ~-- City Planner BB:DC:mlg cc: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer _ Mayor Wil!i~m J. Alexander ~.~ Councilmernbe: Paul Bione ~x Gurierrez ~~.-. ,-',_/--'~ 'mCouncilrn. ember James V. Curat¢lo '1 Mancger I~>-'~...."~, Councilmem~De: Diane Williams 807 · Rancho Cucarno,'"t~a, CA 9172¥9 · (~;:Cq] 989-1851 · FAX (909) 987.64~'"'9 T. H E C I T Y 0 F N C i-I 0 -C U C eptember 15, 1997 Mr. Edward A. Hopson Covington & Crowe, LLP P.O. Box 1515 Ontario, CA 91762 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 Dear Mr. Hopson: The Planning staff has analyzed the Tentative Tract Map time extension request and determined as follows: Findinqs 1. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. 2. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause public and safety problems. The extension is within time limits prescribed by State law and local ordinance. Based upon the findings and staff review set forth in the paragraphs above, the Planning staff hereby grants a time extension for: Tract Applicant ~ Date T-t' 15477 Matreyek November 9, 1998 If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the project planner, Steve Hayes, at (909) 477-2750. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Planner .cck Lcm. A'CP. Cih/Mcncge: CounC:,:mem3er Jcme~ v. Curet;lo '. P.O. Box 837 ·' ....' ' ' ..... ~ '"'~" A V£$I'IN~ MAP ~0~ .~.,~ '.i ....... , . ........ . ~-'- TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 I~, ',. . ~:' ... I~' . -;--. ,".~ ",,&18,',',',',',',',','~. ~ 1~1,' ~~C~~ '" ... .~--,~ '~ TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 ~ .~.~'. MOS%"-..?- ......... ~t,?;. . ..~X?~ ~u. TYPICAL ' , -- TENTATIVE TRACT 15477 · -~ ....... ~ { CONCEPTUAL ~ ~ TENTATIVE TRACT f5477 .. ~ ~ ~ ~ PLAN ..... RIGI4T ELEVATION I~,£HCH COUNTRY STYL. E  PLAN IA ~'~ _eyek Homes ................................ ~ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION FRENCH COUNTRY STYLE PLAN 2A SPANISH COLONIAL S~LE PLAN 2B eyek Homes dtr.dtwlogtr , -~_-_-.~--'..--- , -_ _ ,, / ~.:,.EI ~~-~~ gE~' J FRENCH COUNTRY STYLE PLAN 3A der-developer SPANISH COLONIAL S~LE · PLAN 3B :e~ek Homes ~-~? v ........................ , ...... ~ ' 2 .................... PLAN -/ PERIMETER STRE~c~T ELEVATIONS PLAN I ~ 12~6 SF  reyek Homes K~ ~' ............................... '~ ? .................. 47'-0" PLAN ~ey_ek llomes k ~ ..................... der.developer LI PLAN 1740 SF 3 BR + FAMILY ~[~k Homes der*developer RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15477 FOR 153 DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 20.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM-HIGH (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-691-01. A. Recitals. 1. Diversified Pacific has filed an application for the extension of the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15477, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 9, 1994, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 94-81, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Vesting Tentative Tract 15477. 3. The California State Subdivision Map Act was amended by Assembly Bill 771 (Aquiar) which granted an automatic twelve-month time extension for the application. Additional time extensions were granted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. On the 25th day of October 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby s~oecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng on October 25, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and b. The extension of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and c. The extension of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 15477 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC October 25, 2000 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs land 2 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Application Applicant Expiration Vesting Tentative Tract 15477 Diversified Pacific November 9, 2001 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval in Resolution No. 94-81 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows: Plannin.q Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate, at its own expense, in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman A'Iq'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October, 2000 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: the city of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15516 - HOGEL-IRELAND - The proposed subdivision of 7.9 acres into 5 parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located on the northwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-111-06. Related File: Development Review 99- 75. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: Project Site - Vacant land; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) North - Vacant land; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) South - Across Jersey Avenue, existing industrial development; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) East - Across Rochester Avenue, existing industrial development; General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - Trammel Crow industrial warehouse development (under construction), Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Heavy Industrial North Heavy Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East General Industrial West Heavy Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The site contains one vacant parcel that is 7.9 acres. There are no mature trees on the site nor is there other significant vegetation on the site. The site is currently cultivated as a vineyard. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TPM 15516 - HOGLE-IRELAND October 25, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND: On June 22, 2000, the City Planner approved Design Review 99-75 for five industrial buildings totaling 156,601 square feet. The buildings are designed for warehouse tenants and are oriented to front Jersey Avenue (Exhibit "A"). ANALYSIS: A. General: The project proposes to subdivide a 7.9 acre parcel into 5 smaller parcels varying in size from 1.2 to 2.7 acres. This subdivision will facilitate the industrial development referenced above. Each parcel will house an industrial building with parking. There is enough parking for each parcel and approved land use. There will also be reciprocal vehicular access between all of the parcels. Additionally, according to Development Code Section 17.30.040C3, the above referenced industrial project is exempt from the minimum parcel size requirements because the development is an approved Master Planned Development. B. Desi.qn Review, Technical and Gradinq Committees: Tentative parcel maps are exempt from Committee reviews pursuant to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. C. Environmental Assessment: On June 22, 2000, the City Planner adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the industrial development portion of the project and found that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment. The proposed subdivision is to facilitate the approved industrial development. No further environmental review is required. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map 15516 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. City Planner BB:D~Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan for Development Review 99-75 Exhibit "B" - Tentative Parcel Map 15516 (reduction) Exhibit "C" - City Planner Approval Letter for Development Review 99-75 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map 15516 · A~A JU~TI~IOA TION elto plln ke~ofel site plln ~enerll notes lite legend .......... A1 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15516 /N THE C/I~' OF RANCHO CUCAt~ONCA, COUNI~' OF SAN BERNARD/NO, STATE OF CALIFORN/A UnLII'IE~ B4SI$ OF BgRINCS: ~E~L O~CNlm~N. ' '~ T H E C I T Y 0 F 112 A N C I-I 0 C UC A NiON]G A June 22, 2000 Douglas Stowell Hogle-lreland 4200 Latham Street, Suite B, Riverside, CA 92501 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-75 -ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 229-111-06 Dear Mr. Stowell: The Development Review process for the above-described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Findinqs 1. The proposed industrial complex is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The industrial complex is in accordance with the objectives of the General Industrial Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 9, and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed industrial complex, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4.The proposed professional office complex will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 9). 5. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written reports for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Planner finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgement of the City Planner; and, further, the City Planner has reviewed and considered the information contained in the said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. ~//,~7.__~ Mayor William J' Alexander ~COuncilmember Paul Biane ,~ayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams · Councilmember Bob Du~on Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Co.uncilmember James V. Curatalo 10500 Civic Center Drive · RO, Box 807~* Rancho C~camoriga, CA 91729 * [909] 477-2700 · FAX (909] 477-2849 ~,.~ www, ci,rancho-cucamonga.ca,~s DOUGLAS STOWELL DR 99-75 - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.229-111-06 June 22, 2000 Page 2 b. That, 'based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 735~ of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Planner finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Planner, the City Planner hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects as set forth in Section 735.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Conditions: This project is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planninq Division: 1 ) Provide undulating berms, with an average height of three feet, along Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. 2) Provide screen walls, minimum 4-6 feet high, around outdoor employee eating areas. 3) Provide tables, chairs, and shade for outdoor employee eating areas. 4) All equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened and architecturally compatible with the elevation design from view of surrounding properties and public rights-of-way. Edison transformer location shall be shown on construction plans. 5) Downspouts on the building must be inside walls of the building. 6) The screen gates must be automated to ensure that the gate is open the minimum time necessary to allow trucks in and out of the loading area. Environmental MitJqation Measures: 1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site on Iow-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacture's specifications. 2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in-lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible. DOUGLAS STOWELL DR 99-75 - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.229-111-06 June 22, 2000 Page 3 3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement the work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Enqineerin.q Division: 1 ) Missing frontage improvements shall be installed on all three frontage streets, including but not limited to: curbs and guttem, pavement, streetlights, street trees, sidewalks, signing, striping, etc. Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue are both secondary highways. Boston Place is a local industrial street. Obtain the missing right-of- way from the properly to the north (APN: 229-111-05). This development will be required to complete Rochester Avenue improvements from Jersey Boulevard northerly to join existing curb and gutter. This development will be eligible for a developer reimbursement agreement. 2) Revise City Drawing #1234 (Sheet 3), #1416 (Sheet 3 & 4), and #1339 (Sheet 13) to include the proposed new improvements. 3) Prepare and submit two drainage reports. The first report is to discuss how the off-site flows from the north will be accumulated in its current undeveloped state and its ultimate developed state. Provide drainage easement accepting flows from the north. The second report will provide for this development to mitigate its developed flows which are directed toward the drainage facility in Boston Place, south of Jersey Boulevard. The mitigated study shall be consistent with the study prepared for the development on the south side of Jersey Boulevard (DR 87-56). 4) Rochester Avenue drive approach shall ultimately align with the existing drive approach on the east side. This development may either: a. Obtain an ingress/egress easement from the property to the north, then construct the ultimate drive approach with its development; or b. When the property to the north develops, they will be required to provide this development with an ingress/egress easement. This development will then be responsible to close off the temporary approach and rework its on-site cimulation. Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decision shall be final following a ten-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. DOUGLAS STOWELL DR 99-75 - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.229-111-06 June 22, 2000 Page 4 If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC:D~ma Attachment: Standard Conditions cc: Kamn Mosley, Public Svc. Tech. I Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-75 SUBJECT: JERSEY PROJECT APPLICANT: HOGLE-IRELAND LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements cor, D~etio. Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its .~/ / agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all .~/ / Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check, B, Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if __j / building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C, Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which __J.__/ include site plans, amhitectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Specific Plan. 2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code __j / and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Project No. ,.DR 99-75 Completion Date Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ! ! submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated fo / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development ! !. Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and /.~/ approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up Shall be for individual units .~/ ! with all receptacles shielded from public view. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, ~ ! and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be ___/ ! located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / ! including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ! ! owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units !_.__/ and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ! ! projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be amhitecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. 3. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main ~ / building colors. 2 Project No. DR 99-75 CgmDletion Date Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Ali parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space ~ / abuts a building, wall, support co]umn, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. Ail parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall .__/ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, /.__j entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards, 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and /___/ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, priVate gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commemial and office facilities with 25 or /__./ more parking stalls, Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped, 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or-moro parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 7. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multitamily / / residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces requirad are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack, In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0,5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 8. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for / / commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area, If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. F. Trip Reduction 1. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. ...__/ i 2. Shower facility accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking ol _._/ / bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds: Commercial 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home I---/ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case ol a custom lot subdivision. SC -2-00 ~'*// 3 Project No. DR 9975 Completion Ipate 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place Shall be protected with a construction barrier .~/ in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within ._._/ ! commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three /___/ parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. / / 6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than i ! 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible ! / for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be .__/_._j included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial reck, specimen size trees, meandering .__/ ! sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, .~j ! the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ! ! Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 12. On projects which abut the 1-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the / / freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caitrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the project. If final approvals and/or installation is not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this /_._/ approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. I. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ___/ / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the SC -2-00 4 Project No. DR 99-75 Comoletion Date amount of $71g.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and repor~ on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. J, Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and .~ / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. General Requirements 1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: ~ / a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils /___/ report. Amhitect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / I 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation ! ! coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by ! / the Building and Safety Division. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ! ! marked with th6 project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to I ! existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 5 Project No. OR ~J-?~ Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation i / and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: / ! a. Provide a reduced site plan (8 ~" x 11") which indicates the non-buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). c. Sample document is available from the Building and Safety Division. M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances ! / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). ! ! 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC / / Table 5-A. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. / /___ 6. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906. __/ / 7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. /.~_/ N, Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to .~/ / perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist end submitted at the _._/ / time of application for grading plan check. 4. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ~ / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline)' 5_.~0 total feet on Rochester Avenue. !.~/ 2. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the private streets. / ! 6 Project NO. DR 99-75 Completion Date · 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. ~ / P. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: /.~/ Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Boston P. x x x x x x Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 1. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety /.~/ lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /___/ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, /.___/ and intemonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or /.~/ reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall / / be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan / ! check. Project No. OS 99-7~i Completion D{~te 2. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. /'~J 3. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / ! adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commemial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. R, Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final i.~./ map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe /.~j measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. S. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, .~/ / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. .~j / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for /.~/ all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U, General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The / / developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be: 6,500 gallons per minute, Per '97 UFC Appendix Ill-A, 3, (b) /___/ (Increase). a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire / / department personnel prior to water plan approval. sc-2 0 8 b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants / / shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, ! / flushed, and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required / ! hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / ! submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of the required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. .~j / 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: a. Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. ~ ! b. Other: UBC. ~ / Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine it the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of ~ ! sprinkler system. 9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: a. All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 32. /_~/ 10. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. /...~/ 11. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements. 12. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus. 13. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall / / be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 14. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the / / Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 15, A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire / ! Safety Division for the proper form letter. 16. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho i / Cucamonga Fire Protection District as follows: a. $677 for New Commercial and Industrial Development (per new building).** 9 Project No. DI~ $9-7~. Comoletion Date **Note: Separate plan check fees for Tenant Improvement work, fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997 UBC, ! / UFC, UPC, UMC, and RCFD Standards 32 and 15 and 1996 NEC. V, Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically ! ! described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. b. High piled combustible stock. /.__/ NOTE: SEPARATE PLAN CHECK FEES FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, FIRE PROTECTION ! ! SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS, HOOD SYSTEMS, ALARMS, ETC.), AND/OR ANY CONSULTANT REVIEWS WILL BE ASSESSED UPON SUBMI'I-rAL OF PLANS. NOTE: A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN CHECK SUBMI3-1'AL IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE IMPROVEMENTS BEING PROPOSED WILL GENERATE 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF COMBINED CUT AND FILL. THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: W. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, ~_._/ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. ~ / X. Security Hardware 1. One-inch single cylinder dead bolls shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are /~ within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. ! / 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. / / Y. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. / / 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall / / be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. sc_2 o 10 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15516, SUBDIVIDING 7.9 ACRES INTO 5 PARCELS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHVVEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-111-06. A. Recitals. 1. Hogle-lreland filed a Tentative Parcel Map Number 15561, for the purpose of subdividing into 5 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, identified as APN: 229-111-06, located at the northwest comer of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, which is hereinafter referred to as "the applicetion." 2. On June 22, 2000, the City Planner approved Development Review 99-75 for the subject property; and 3. On October 25, 2000, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public headng for the above-described map. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on October 25, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Tentative Tract Parcel Map is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code; and b. The improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment; and e The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted on June 22, 2000, (for the industrial development portion of the project) and that the proposed subdivision of 7.9 acres into 5 smaller parcels is to facilitate the approved industrial development; no further environmental review is required. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TPM 15516 - HOGLE-IRELAND October 25, 2000 Page 2 4. Based upon the findings of approval and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the Tentative Parcel Map subject to the following Special Conditions: Planning Division 1) The conditions of approval for Development Review 99-75, as contained in the City Planner's letter dated June 22, 2000, shall apply. En,qineednf:l Division 1) The approved conditions of Development Review 99-75, as contained in the City Planner's letter dated June 22, 2000, shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman A'FI'EST: Brad Bullet, Secreta~ I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, an,~ adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: T H E C I T Y OF I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: October 25, 2000 TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROIV~ Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Community Commercial for an approximately 8,000 square foot parcel, located approximately 450 feet south of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-211-05. Related file: General Plan Amendment 99-06A. BACKGROUND: In December 1999, the Planning Division received a General Plan Amendment application (GPA 99-06) from Hall & Foreman Engineering to change the land use designation for two parcels totaling approximately 11.25 acres from Medium Residential to Community Commercial (Exhibit "A"). A remainder parcel of approximately 8,000 square feet would be left as Medium Residential if said amendment is approved. On several occasions, the project developer has attempted to purchase the remainder property or receive authorization from the property owner to include the subject property in the GPA 99-06A request; however, the property owner has not responded to the developer's inquiries. The developer submitted a letter indicating the dates the property owner was contacted (Exhibit "B"). Because of its size, shape, and location, City staff believes that this parcel should be included in the proposed land use change to allow for master planning of the entire area. Therefore, City staff is asking the Planning Commission to authorize staff to file a General Plan Amendment Application for the subject 8,000 square foot parcel. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission authorize staff to file an additional GPA application for the 8,000 square-foot parcel in connection with GPA 99-06A. City Planner Attachments: Exhibit"A" - General Plan Amendment Request Map Exhibit "B" - Letter from developer to the City of Rancho Cucamonga indicating the dates the property owner was contacted ITEM F FOOTHILL / 8800 20721105.~~. , ~- / 20?21136 \ 20721106 l GPA 99-06A REQUEST , From Residential to Commercial I 200 0 200 400 Feet September 25, 2000 Sal Salazar City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Southwest Comer of Foothill and Vineyard Project Dear Sal: Per your request I am sending you the following correspondences I have sent to Mr. Roger Collins the property owner of record for 8192 Vineyard Ave. As 1 have mentioned to you before, Mr. Collins is the son of Mrs. Stevens who quitclaimed the property to her son on February 4, 2000. Mrs. Stevens no longer resides at the property and has since been placed into a convalescent home. Following correspondences: 1) March 8, 2000 -Letter 2) March 27, 2000 - Letter 3) June 1, 2000 - Letter and Offer toPurchase 4) June 14,2000 - Offer to Purchase 5) September 25, 2000 - Telephone call to Roger Collins As you can see I have made several attempts to include 8192 Vineyard into the master planning of proposed project at the Southwest Comer of Foothill and Vineyard. There has been no response from Mr. Collins either in favor or against my correspondences. Please call me should you have any further questions. Respectfully, Gil Rodriguez Jr. Enclosures: Photos of 8192 Vineyard Ave. VIEW FROM FOOTHILL/VINEYARD INTERSECTION iSIDE VIEW OF GARAGE EAST EAST ELEVATION ELEVATION INTERIOR BUILDING T H E C I T Y OF I~ANCHO CUCA~ONGA D^TE: O~tober 25, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ROOFING MATERIALS ABSTRACT: The purpose of the report is to review policy regarding residential roof materials and, if the Commission concurs, direct staff to proceed with initiating an amendment to the Development Code. BACKGROUND: Since 1987, the Planning Commission has consistently upheld a residential design policy to require roofing material that has a high quality appearance such as tile (flat concrete or mission). The policy of requiring tile-roofing material is reflected in every planning document adopted since 1987, such as the architectural guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. The policy only applies to new construction, and does not apply to re-roofing or room additions to houses with composition shingles or wood shakes. As a result of an appeal regarding the requirement for tile-roofing material for a custom house, the City Council directed staff to study and bring back a proposed Ordinance on roofing material that is reflective of the Planning Commission's policy. Staff has worked with the City Attorney in development of design guidelines and development standards for roofing material. The following section describes the proposed text changes for the Commission's discussion. ANALYSIS: The City Attorney indicated that the City could adopt more stringent building Codes based upon the safety concerns of fire and wind resistance. However, this approach does not necessarily limit or prohibit the types of roofing materials that meet the minimum fire and wind resistance characteristics, which may include composition shingles. The City may also establish design standards including a list of higher-grade roofing materials, which are aesthetically superior based upon the City's ability to enforce the aesthetic standards required for projects. As a result of the City Attorney's opinion, staff prepared design guidelines and development standards for roofing material based purely on aesthetic control. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed Ordinance: A. Add the following criteria to Section 17.08.090D2 of the General Design Guidelines: Use roofing material made of tile, slate, copper, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, that will upgrade the character and the visual quality of the structure. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ROOFING MATERIALS October 25, 2000 Page 2 COMMENT: The Design Guidelines of the Residential Section of the Development Code are intended to represent the Community Design Element of tl'~e General Plan. The design guidelines are specific criteria that implement the goals and policies stated in the General Plan. The addition of the proposed design criteria sgts the tone for establishing acceptable roofing material based on aesthetic control in the Site Development Criteria section of the Code. B. Modify Section 17.08.090D4 of the General Design Guidelines as follow~,': Materials and Colors. Color, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materials and colors chosen should complement the building character and enhance the visu~l quality. COMMENT: Adding the italicized words will further the purpose of ae,~,thetic control as mentioned above. C. Add a new subsection in the Site Development Criteria, Section 17.080.040, as follows: Roofin.q Materials. All new development within residential districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such ~s metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shin~les, may be approved by the Design Review Committee, if it is determin~:d by the Design Review Committee that the roof matedal enhances th~ building design. Roofing materials for additions and accessory structure,,~ shall be governed by Section 17.08.0601 f, Special Development Criteria. COMMENT: The above development criteria is the aesthetic control on roofing material. It is focused and prescriptive as to the acceptable roofing material. As recommended by the City Attorney, the words "imitation thereof" was added to expand the choices of roofing material through the design review process. With advances; in technology, manufacturers may invent new products, such as tile-like, or slate-like materials that have the same high quality and grade as real ones. The design review process provides a venue for design solutions and the creative use of materials. D. Add a new subsection in Special Development Criteria, Section 17.08.060, as follows: Roofinq Materials. Ail accessory structures, including, but not 1~33ited to, second dwelling units, guest houses, carports, detached or attached garages, and additions to main houses shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or imitation thereof, but not including composition ~hingles. Detached accessory structures with roof cover that exceeds 121) square feet in area and/or are subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses, shall have roofing material made of tile, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. The pitch of th~, roof for additions and accessory structures shall be designed to accor,3modate roof materials made of tile, s/ate, or an imitation thereof. Where the roof material for the main house consists of wood or composition ',~hing/es; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ROOFING MATERIALS October 25, 2000 Page 3 additions to the main house, attached or detached accessory structures, and re-roofing can include the same material. Detached accessory structures with roof cover such as patio covers, cabanas, etc., that do not exceed 120 square feet in area and/or are not subject to public view from streets or from adjacent land uses may use other roof materials as approved by the City Planner. When such circumstances allow the use of composition singles, it shall be of architectural dimension style to create a shadow. The burden of proof for detached accessory structures not subject to public view is on the applicant, which shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval. Accessory structures for equestrian or agricultural uses such as barns for keeping of horses, or storing of agricultural equipment may include other roof materials (metal) as approved by City Planner. COMMENT: Besides having clear design criteria of roofing material for new development, staff believes that the City should have clear design criteria for additions and re-roofing. The proposed criteria requiring tile roof for additions and allowing re- roofing with asphalt shingles represent the current practice. Staff added criteria specifically to address the detached accessory structures because of the high level of building permits for such structures. Detached structures over 120 square feet in area are subject to the tile roofing material while detached structures less than 120 square feet are net. This is because detached accessory structures that are less than 120 square feet do not require building permits by Building Codes and are not subject to Planning Division review. The added criteria will help clarify and simplify matters for residents. A brief windshield survey of areas within the Equestrian Overlay District shows that there are already existing horse barns or structures over horse corrals that have other roof material such as metal. Therefore, staff recommends adding criteria for City Planner review of structures for agricultural and equestrian uses on a case-by-case basis. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed changes on roofing material, and if the Commission concurs, then direct staff to initiate an amendment to the Development Code. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF:Is