Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/05/23 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY MAY 23, 2001 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel Vice Chairman Macias __ Com. Mannerino Com. Stewart__ Com. Tolstoy__ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES May 9, .2001 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-08 BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a retail establishment in the General Commercial District, located at 9456 Roberds Street - APN 202-092-08. (Continued from April 25, 2001) B. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 94-02 - COFFEE KLATCH - A compliance review of the Entertainment Permit for Koffee Klatch in the Specialty Commercial District, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-101-23. C. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various sections of the Victoria Community Plan for consistency with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and Mixed Use land use designation. V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS D. PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2001-00258 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A review of the proposed site acquisition of .34 acre of land for expansion of Etiwanda Intermediate School, located in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 13004 Victoria Avenue, approximately 400 feet west of Pecan Avenue - APN: 227-253-11 and the westerly portion of 10. E. ENGINEERING DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS ThJs is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VII.COMMISSION BUSINESS F. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRESS - Oral report VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 18, 2001, at least 72 hours pdor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 2 Vicinity Map Planning Commission May 23, 2001 Hill Banyan 19th/210 Fw~ Baseline I Foothill Arrow C 4th .C) > .-~ LL Items E and F are City-wide City of Rancho Cucamonga CiTY HALL Victoria Planned Community THE CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCA~ONGA Staff Report DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a retail establishment in the General Commemial District, located at 9456 Roberds Street - APN: 202-092-08, BACKGROUND: On January 10, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed Conditional Use Permit 98-08 and directed staff to set a public hearing to consider revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. The public hearing was set for February 14, 2001, at which time the Commission reviewed the progress that the applicant had made since the January 10 meeting and extended the time frame to February 28. Because of the weather delay, a portion of the project had not been completed by February 28 and the hearing was continued to April 25 to allow the applicant time to process a new application for 'retail use. The applicant finished the parking area on March 27, 2001. On April 25, 2001, the public hearing was continued to allow the applicant to submit revised plans. Since the last hearing the applicant has submitted a revised parking layout for the parcel off of Amethyst. On May 17, 2001, the Planning and Engineering Division's deemed the plans complete for processing. Outstanding technical issues from both Divisions still exist; however, these can be resolved through Committee Reviews. The new submittal includes a new parking layout to include paving, parking, landscaping, and lighting required for the expansion of retail use. The owners also submitted a revised time line. ANALYSIS: At the April 25, 2001 meeting, the applicant was given an additional 30 days time to address outstanding issues and submit completed plans. Outstanding completeness issues from the previous letter dated April 5, 2001, from Planning Division required a revised parking layout as well as landscaping and lighting details to be submitted. The Engineering Division also required additional detail regarding the location of right-of-way and driveway access. These issues have all been addressed. Staff has been working diligently with the applicant to help resolve all outstanding issues. There are currently no outstanding completeness issues for the new submittal. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER May 23, 2001 Page 2 .. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, notices were mailed to surrounding property owners, and the property was posted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution suspending revocation of Conditional Use Permit 98-08. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:EW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Minutes dated February 14, 2001 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated February 28, 2001 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Minutes dated April 25, 2001 Exhibit "D" - Incompleteness Letter dated April 5, 2001 Exhibit "E" - Phasing Plan Resolution Suspending Revocation of Conditional Use Permit 98-08 easement for general public and public utility purposes, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of RochesterAvenue-APN: 227-091-45. Related File: Tract 16051. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, carded 5-0, to adopt the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER-A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a retail establishment in the General Commercial District, located at 9456 Roberds Street r APN 202-092-08. Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. She noted that two letters had been received in support of the applicant asking that the Conditional Use Permit not be revoked and indicated that the owner of the 7-11 store had telephoned and indicated support of a revocation because customers of Baseline Bargain Center block his access and trash pickup. Brad Bullet, City Planner, reported that he had accompanied Ms. Wimer to the site and noted there is progress being made. He suggested the applicant speak regarding the progress and public testimony be taken. Chairman McNiel noted the staff report included a long list of code enforcement problems and it appeared staff had been attempting to obtain conformance for a long time. He felt the matter had gone on for an excessive amount of time. Mr. Buller concurred it had gone on a long time but indicated the applicant had made some major moves in the last few days to bring it into compliance. Chairman McNiel opened the public headng. Laura Iftikhar, 9456 Roberds Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she and her husband own the store. She said they have almost completed the parking area with the exception of stripping which should be completed shortly. She reported they were going to submit for a new conditional use permit to allow retail. She indicated she had the plans with her and would be submitting them either later in the evening or on Thursday. She stated they made tax contributions of over $26,00She felt the personal investment they made should be considered based on the business license which was approved in error in June 1999. She pointed out that the business makes charitable contributions to the community including Feed the Children, Spark of Love toy drive, and food ddves for schools. She stated they have community support and presented a petition signed by approximately 1,300 people. She felt the petition demonstrated community support and said the business meets the needs of the community. She stated they opened their business because the City wrongfully approved a business license. Mrs. Iftikhar felt the City was unfairly targeting their business and said that they had observed signs such as theirs and parking violations by other businesses in the community. She asked that the City consider future development of their property and said they may have a farmer's market or event hall on their property. She said they need to maintain a positive retail cash flow in order to pay for the development and they want to spend the money on developing their property rather than renting retail space elsewhere. Mrs. Iftikhar thought the City was interfering with her constitutional rights and said that the rights of property owners and customers must be considered. She said the people have the right to alter or abolish government if it becomes excessive. She acknowledged that their business does not fully comply with City codes but she felt the business did more good than harm. She requested that the City continue to work with them while they attempt to comply. She indicated they had been frustrated because their architect did not lead them through the process and they had recently obtained a contractor and she believed things would progress more quickly now. Planning Commission Minutes - 2 - February/14, 2001 Exh; "A" Commissioner Tolstoy indicted he had visited the establishment earlier in the day and noticed work being performed on the parking lot. He observed that the parking lot will be quite a distance from the front door to the store. He said he noticed three cars illegally parked in the yellow stdped area. He felt that people will COntinue to park illegally because the parking lot is so far away, Mrs. Iftikhar responded they want to develop the street and curb along Roberds and have street parking. She said they are also considering moving the store within the building to be closer to the parking lot. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the plans Mrs. Iflikhar had with her reflect what she had just told the Commission. Mrs. Iffikhar replied that she was not sure. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if licensed professional people must prepare final plans, Mr. Buller replied that the City requires that a licensed landscape architect prepare final landscape plans and an engineer must prepare any street improvement plans. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the required signatures were on the plans. Mrs. Iftikhar responded that they were not as they were only taking baby steps and a draftsman prepared the plans. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that the illegal parking currently occurring is very dangerous. Commissioner Stewart asked Mrs. Iftikhar what plans she had. Mrs. Iffikhar said they were plans for the'proposed parking lot. Commissioner Stewart asked if it addressed changes to the building. Mrs. Iflikhar said it did not as they are still considering changes. Bob Lamb, 7250 Amethyst Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated his property joins the property in question. He said he was speaking for the Trdjillos, whom he had spoken to earlier in the day. He gave a brief history of the building. He said he had been there since the 1920s. He indicated a small read curves from Base Line Road to Amethyst and he previously wanted to have that road shut off, but he failed to contact the City. He thought the 7-11 store has created a lot of problems for the neighborhood. He stated that kids hang out there and there have been stolen cars and a lot of graffiti. He said people come up Base Line Road and ignore the stop sign. He felt the Iftikhars have done a lot to improve the property and said they have stopped the graffiti, replaced floors, and upgraded the building. Clarence Weaver, Western State Construction, 1500 Crestfield, Duarte, said he had picked up a set of plans on Thursday, February 8. He stated that Ms. Wimer had been very cooperative. He felt they were on the dght track and would fall into COmpliance. Susie Cuzynski, 6262 Marble Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, felt the business is a wonderful asset to the community. She indicated she is an aide in her children's' school and gets many items for the school and chumh there and said she would hate to see the demise of the facility. She stated she has never had a problem parking there. She said the Iftikhars do not have the money to make it perfect from the start but she felt theywill eventually be able to COmply. She thought the City should COnsider their hard work and endurance. · Planning Commission ,Minutes - 3 - February 14, 2001 Chairman McNiel asked how many people in the audience were there in support of the applicant. Approximately 25 people raised their hands. Bob Burglan, 7126 Cambridge Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he has been a resident for the past 25 years and the building now looks better than it ever has. He said they welcome him every time he goes into the store~ Chairman McNiel temporarily closed the public headng to allow discussion with staff. Mr. Bullet stated that staff had received calls and written correspondence supporting the applicant. He said staff believes there has been an effort in the recent past to comply. He observed there had not been compliance until the City started revocation proceedings. He noted the parking is on the north side of the building, away from the door. He stated the approved use was for a warehouse facility, not a retail cente~, therefore, staff accepted the distance between the parking lot and the door. He said the 14 parking spaces were placed in the only area of the site that could physically accommodate them. He felt the Planning Commission may wish to grant a two-week continuance to see if the parking is finalized in that time. He said the front of the building must be stripped, posted "No parking," and policed by the Iffikhars. He stated the wheel stops should also be removed from that area and the Iflikhars had indicated they will be moved to the new parking area. He observed that the retail business would have to be closed in order to come into compliance with the existing conditional use permit. He stated the wholesale business could be open by appointment in order to still meet the needs of the community and said it was meant to be a wholesale business. He believed a two-week continuance would be apprepdate and said staff needs to work with the applicant. He stated staff is very pleased with the contractor they had hired. He believed the Iflikhars have a larger dream for the area and it would improve the area. He said the applicants could come back to the Commission with a new conditional use permit to allow retail and could present a phasing plan; however, a complete application had not been submitted as yet. Chairman McNiel asked if two weeks would be sufficient. Mr. Bullet felt it would. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the existing conditional use permit requires full improvements in front of the store. Mr. Bullet replied the existing conditional use permit does not require those improvements. He said a new conditional use permit would require curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the parking he observed eadier in the day is dangerous. Motion: Moved by Mannedno to continue Conditional Use Permit 98-08 to February 28, 2001, based on the apparent good faith effort. Commissioner Macias stated he was glad progress is finally being made toward obtaining the parking; however, the issue remains as to the retail use. He felt the Commission should not ignore the fact that the applicant is not in compliance. He suggested that the applicant submit a phasing plan if the matter were continued for two weeks. He said the Commission routinely deals with small businesses that do things con'ectly and scdmp and save to do things right. Because of those who do things dght, he felt it was unfair to ignore non-compliance. Commissioner Mannerino amended his motion to include the requirement for a draft phasing plan. He said it is clear the applicants are popular people who do good things for the community but the said the Commission cannot turn its back on its legal obligations. He suggested people watch where they park and said that if the illegal parking continues, the City would have no choice but to act. Planning Commission Minutes - 4 - February 14, 2001 Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, suggested reopening the public hearing for additional comments. Chaimnan McNiel reopened the public headng. Mary Dineen, 6418 Malachite Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she agreed with what she had heard. She suggested the area with the yellow stripes be labeled to prohibit parking. She said she would hate to see the store closed and indicated she prefers "mom and pop" shops to larger stores. Mr. Lamb stated that the store is convenient to the assisted living facility and many of those residents walk to the store. Joan Tammer, 7250 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, felt the store creates a wonderful atmosphere. She asked how the Iftikhars will live if their retail business is closed. She thought the City should not stop them since they are improving the area. She acknowledged she did not understand the technical items but said the area is kept up. Mada Perez, 6231 Filkins Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she wanted to keep the store open because it provides food for kids and wrinkle cream for older people. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded Commissioner Mannedno's motion to continue Conditional Use Permit 98-08 to February 28, 2001,with a requirement for submission of a phasing plan. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MAClAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded Chairman McNiel thanked the audience members for their support of the Iftikhars but indicated it is important that the location be brought into compliance. He said the Commission has to consider the rest of the community and there are certain standards and guidelines with which they must comply. He said the City is not trying to put them out of business, but is trying to make them comply with the terms of the conditional use permit and to protect the public safety. Commissioner Tolstoy observed that the problem has been going on for 2~ years. The Planning Commission recessed from 8:17 p.m. to 8:23 p.m. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-04- AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to establish a Development Agreement for the development project known as the Victoria Arbors on approximately 300.64 acres of land in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and Day Creek Channel to the west - APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 31,33, and 36; 227-161-28, 31, 33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-08, 11, 12, 20, 22, 23, and 25; and 227-211-40. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 01-04 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to establish a residential Master Plan for a development project known as the Victoria Arbors for approximately 300.64 acres of land, in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and Day Creek Channel to Planning Commission Minutes - 5 - February 14, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting February 28, 2001 Chairman McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannedno, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bullet, City Planner;, Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attomey; Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, Nancy Fong, Senior Planner;, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer;, Brent Le Count, Associate Planner; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Bullet, City Planner, indicated several items were placed in front of the Commissioners and those items would be referred to when the related projects were considered. He recommended that Items B through E be moved to the end of the agenda and stated that staff had been working with that applicant up until tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Macias, seconded by Stewart, carded 5-0, to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of February 14, 2001. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a retail establishment in the General Commercial District, located at 9456 Roberds Street - APN 202-092-08. (Continued from February 14, 2001) Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and indicated the applicant submitted a phasing plan detailing proposed development, which had been placed before the Commission. She noted that on Tuesday, February 27, the applicant submitted plans for a parking lot for the parcel on Amethyst. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the dates were on the phasing plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, said staff asked the applicant to state dates. He explained that if the applicant submits a complete application for the retail store, the matter would be heard at the City Planner level and he would ask for specific dates or would set dates as conditions if he approves the use. He indicated the phasing plan was submitted in response to the Commission's request at the Planning Commission meeting on February 14. Chairman McNiel stated the public headng was still open. Lora Iftikhar, 9456 Roberds Street, Rancho Cucamonga, apologized for not providing the dates on the phasing plan. She stated she and her husband are not project managers or contractors and they do not know how long it will take to complete some of the steps but she realized that each step is contingent upon completing the previous step. She said they are eager to get the project done as soon as possible. She felt things would go faster now that they have acquired the Amethyst lot. She said they have not completed the striping and slurry seal on the parking lot because of the weather. She reported that escrow on the Amethyst lot had closed and they had asked their draftsman to provide a list of civil engineers so they can get going right away. Commissioner Stewart stated the phasing plan lists acquisition of several homes and she asked if that was feasible. Ms. Iflikhar replied they are in negotiations with a home and property on Amethyst and for the Enright Plumbing property. She said they are working on acquiring financing for them. She indicated the 59 parking spaces on the Amethyst lot is a separate issue and those are strategic acquisitions for future potential use. Commissioner Macias asked for clarification of the issues at hand. Mr. Buller said the currently approved Conditional Use is for wholesale use and certain improvements were supposed to be completed before they began operations. He indicated the Iftikhars opened their business before the physical improvements were completed. He said the second issue was that they opened the business for retail use, which had not been approved. commissioner Macias asked which of the seven phases in the phasing plan are pertinent to resolving the issues at hand. Mr. Bullet replied the land acquisitions shown in the phasing plan are not pertinent to resolving the immediate issues. He said they were required to build a parking lot with 14 spaces prior to opening the wholesale use. He thought that parking lot would have been completed by this evening except for the recent rains. He explained the retail component was opened without securing proper perm~ and requires additional parking. He said the Iftikhare have now closed escrow on a lot which will allow them to develop the required parking. He observed the future acquisitions are to allowthem to ultimately take the entire block and master plan a business plan to allow them to maximize the use of the large existing building with potential uses suggested of a Farmers Market, event hall, or shopping mini-mall. He stated that Commissioner Tolstoy raised a good point at the last meeting regarding the majority of the parking being to the north, but the retail entrance being to the south. He said the City Planner is suggesting that the orientation of the building be related to where the parking lot is located or a good pedestrian circulation path be developed from the parking to the entrance. He reported the application submitted is still incomplete. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. commissioner Mannerino supported staff's recommendation to give the applicant 60 days to complete the Conditional Use Permit for retail use. He commented that the phasing plan is an ambitious endeavor and he favored success, but he was concerned that the applicant has twice told the Commission that they are unfamiliar with what is necessary. He said they have become a ?lan. ning Commission Minutes -2-//] (? February 28, 2001 FI developer of a retail use and he felt that comment rings hollow. He suggested they must familiarize themselves with what is needed if they wish to pursue. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the phasing plan needs dates for other than the land acquisition. He suggested that the phasing timeline be required immediately. Commissioner Stewart agreed. She was particularly interested in seeing the timeline for Phase Two because that is what will bring the retail use into compliance. Commissioner Macias asked if there had been any interaction between the Iftikhars and staff since the last Planning Commission meeting. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Ms. Iftikhar responded affirmatively. Commissioner Macias said no one wants to shut them down but we want them to do things dght. He observed that other people have limited resources and they do things right and the Iftikhars need to also. He concurred with staff's recommendation to continue the item until April 25. Chairman McNiel again closed the public hearing. He agreed with the recommendation for a continuance to April 25. He felt staff had probably already offered assistance to help them through the process. He thought that if they are not in compliance by April 25, the Commission should just go ahead and act on the initial recommendation for revocation. Mr. Buller appreciated the indulgence of the Commission because he believed the Iftikhars are making a good faith effort but said they need some assistance from somebody on their team to do the plans as the City cannot do the plans for them. He said he can condition the phasing plan with what he believes to be appropriate timelines but he was giving them an opportunity to submit a recommended timeline as a business decision. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that was what he thought was going to be submitted tonight. Commissioner Mannerino commented they are in the business and they have chosen the business. Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by'Macias, to continue Conditional Use Permit 98-08 to April 25, 2001. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MAClAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded F. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15278 - PKT PROPERTIES LLC -A request to subdivide 1.10 acres into three parcels in the Low Residential Distdct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest comer of Banyan Street and London Avenue - APN: 201-251-049. Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel asked for clarification regarding the letter from Metropolitan Water Distdct and asked if the project would infringe on Metropolitan Water Distdct property. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, replied the City will send them grading plans dudng the technical plan check for comments. He indicated there would be no impacts or infringements on Metropolitan Water Distdct property. Planning Commission Minutes -3- //7 '~ February 28, 2001 /! / Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Tolstoy, carded 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER- A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a retail establishment in the General Commemial District, located at 9456 Roberds Street - APN 202-092-08. Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and noted that a revised Site Plan and a Phasing Plan had been presented and those documents were provided to the Commissioners. Mr. Macias arrived dudng the staff report presentation. Commissioner Mannedno asked if staff had reviewed the new items submitted. Ms. Wimer replied that staff had bdefly reviewed them. She reported Senior Civil Engineer Dan James had indicated corrections are needed regarding the curb and gutter and frontage improvements on Roberds Street. She said Mr. James did not feel the applicant would be able to meet the phasing plan which was submitted and it would be 30 days behind. Brad Buller, City Planner, asked Ms. Wimer to point out remaining issues which need to be addressed before the application can be deemed complete. Ms. Wimer responded that updates are needed as to the layout of the parking lot. She said they provided the average landscape area. She indicated the parking count was the minimum required. She said the plan did provide the wrought iron fencing details which the City requested. She reported that the lighting plan has not been submitted as yet. She observed that the Commission had requested that a pedestrian walkway to the store entrance be provided and the public entrance to the building be relocated to the side of the building facing the parking lot and the applicant had not presented a new plan showing those changes. She said there were still outstanding planning issues. Chairman McNiel noted that the public hearing was still open as the matter was continued from a previous meeting. Sam Iftikhar, Baseline Bargain Center, 8811 Luriine Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they need more time to submit Civil Engineering plans. He thought the plans could be submitted in three to four weeks. He said they are ready to build but their Civil Engineer is not available until the middle of May. Chairman McNiel stated it was his understanding that the applicant is making efforts to comply but their inexperience with the process is causing them difficulty. He asked if they had looked at the · proposed change of entrance. Mr. Ittikhar said their draftsman from C & G Construction is out of town until next week. Lora Iftikhar, Baseline Bargain Center, 8811 Luriine Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they are considering moving the entrance to the north side but that would take additional time up to the end of the year because they have to redo the ceiling and refinish the floor among other things. Chairman McNiel asked if the project will be done. Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 25, 2001 Mr. Iftikhar responded affirmatively but said it is time consuming. Mrs. Iflikhar said she was under the perception that they are making good progress. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had gone to the store earlier in the day and four Penske trucks were parked there. He said there were also a couple of pallets in a parking space with items on them. Mr. Iffikhar responded that he had moved some merchandise from his warehouse. He stated that only two trucks were still there. Commissioner Tolstoy observed that at the last meeting, the Commission had requested that they not park in that area and the Iffikhars indicated they would police the parking. Mr. Iffikhar stated he had to park there in order to go in and get the driver to help him move the merchandise. Commissioner Tolstoy stated there had been no room for customers to park because of the trucks and pallets. Mr. Bullet indicated there will be conditions for street improvements in connection with the conditional use permit for retail use. He said some of the street improvements will face Roberds Street and some will face Amethyst Avenue. C°mmissi°ner Macias apologized to the Commission and staff for arriving late. He said he gathered new information had been presented and staff had not had enough time to review it. He felt the issue is completion of the application. He asked what it would take for the application to be in compliance. Mr. Buller stated a full submittal package is needed, including a site plan that will not require a Minor Exception or a Variance, or submission of a Minor Exception or Vadance application. He indicated the submission needs a lighting plan and a conceptual plan for the entire site. Commissioner Macias asked how long it should take to submit what is missing. Mr. Buller responded that staff felt the previous 60 day continuance should have been more than sufficient time to get a complete application and obtain approval by the City Planner. He thought it should have taken only about 14 days to submit the complete application. He stated the applicants had shown this week that they are trying to work out the problems. He said it should not take more than 14 days to submit what is needed but he noted Mr. Iffikhar had said their Civil Engineer was not available. Mrs. Iftikhar stated their Civil Engineer will not be available until May 20. Mr. Buller stated that a lot of other businesses continue to comply and follow the rules. He said staff supports the use in that location but the proper parking is needed. Commissioner Stewarl asked if staff was working directly with the person preparing the plans or with the Iffikhars. Ms. Wimer responded she had been dealing with both the draftsperson and the Iffikhars. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how long the situation had been going on. Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 25, 2001 .. Ms. Wimer responded that the first evidentiary hearing was held on January 10, 2001. Mr. Buller indicated staff had been trying for almost two years to bring the project into compliance. Mr. Iftikhar indicated they could try to get another Civil Engineer this week. Chairman McNiel felt that may be wise and said there is more than one Civil Engineer. Mr. Iftikhar said they had tded to get one who could work on their project sooner but most could not do it for six or seven months. David Feldman, 6096 Muscat Place, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is a customer of the store and shops there all the time. He said he opened a car dealership in another town and found it to be a time consuming process. He asked that the Commission allow the Iftikhars time to process their application if they are making a reasonable effort. Kent Baird, 8651 Ramona Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, indicated he had attended the public hearing on February 14 and there had been a lot of people who spoke in favor continuing the hearing and a petition had also been presented. He stated the Iftikhars may have financial constraints and he felt they provide a good service to the community. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mannerino commended the applicant's efforts and was not opposed to granting additional time. He said that even if there were 2,000 signatures on an application asking the Cityto suspend speed laws, the City would not be swayed. He observed that the headng had been continued three times. He commented that this was the business that the Iftikhars chose and they must come in with a sophisticated application and sufficient financing. He said he would like to have the project return in 30 days. Dudng the 30-day continuance pedod, he wanted the applicant to meet with staff. At the 30-day point he wanted to see a completed application and a construction time-line submitted by the applicant. He felt that if the applicant submits the time line, they should not complain if they do not meet it. Commissioner Macias said he had come to the meeting prepared to make a suggestion to grant an additional 30 days, but he noted that would equate to 90 days. He observed that the Commission requested a phasing plan at the last meeting. He suggested that the Commission grant a 30-day continuance but put the applicant on notice that the retail use will be shut down after the 30 days if they have not done as the Commission requested. He asked if the Commission could do that. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, responded affirmatively. He stated the resolution before the Commission was drafted to find that the operation was not in compliance and that if the operation was still being conducted in violation of the City Codes after 10 days, it directed the City Planner to revoke the Conditional Use Permit. He said the resolution could be modified to direct the City Planner to revoke the permit if a completed application had not been submitted and acted upon within 30 days. Commissioner Macias felt that if the project were appealed to the City Council, it would show that the Commission gave them fair warning and enough time to bring the operation into compliance. He felt it would show the Commission went the extra yard and notified the applicants this would be the last extension. Chairman McNiel questioned if 30 days would be sufficient time. Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 25, 2001 Mr. Buffer felt that 30 days would be sufficient time to submit a completed application but would not allow enough time for the public headng pdor before the City Planner because of the lead time necessary for advertising and noticing the headng. Chairman McNiel asked if 60 days would be sufficient. Mr. Bullet responded affirmatively. Chairman McNiel asked if the Commissioners thought 60 days was out of the question. Commissioner Macias stated it is an ongoing business that the Community appreciates and he would hate to shut it down now. He was willing to go 60 days but he wanted it made clear that if they had not accomplished everything within the 60 days, they would be shut down. Commissioner Tolstoy questioned why the matter hadn't been handled during the last 60-day continuance. He asked why the Commissioners should believe it would be done dudng the next 60 days. He felt it should be shut down. Commissioner Mannerino felt the City should monitor the progress. He suggested a 30-day continuance dudng which time a completed application for the retail Conditional Use Permit would need to be submitted. He said it would then be possible for the City to see if such a use would work for that property. Mr. Buller noted that would still allow the unpermitted use to continue for 30 days. He observed they have a Conditional Use Permit for a wholesale operation and they are finally in compliance with those conditions. He said that the City could shut down the retail use as that portion is in non- compliance. Mr. Ennis suggested the Commission could continue the hearing for 30 days and require that the completed application be submitted in that time. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to continue Conditional Use Permit 98-08 to May 23, 2001, during which time a completed application for the retail use would need to be submitted. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carded C. DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA, EXTENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S ABILITY TO INCUR DEBT BY 10 YEARS AND ADDING CAPITAL PROJECTS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. DIRECTOR'S REPORT,~ E. AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA - Review of conformity of Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 2 with the General Plan. Mitch Slagerman, Senior RDA Analyst; presented the staff report and suggested rewording the title of the Resolution to clarify that the Commission found the project in conformity with the General Plan. Planning Commission Minutes -5- Apd125, 2001 :1- H E C I T Y 0 F A NC I-IQ C UC A M© NC April 5, 2001 Sam and Lora Iftikhar 8811 Ludine Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 SUBJECT: DRC 2001-00088 Dear Mr. Iflikhar: Thank. you for submitting your proposed project, We want your project to be a success, one which you and the City can be proud of. We have assigned a project planner, Emily Wimer, to assist you throughout the review process up to final occupancy, We have reviewed the application for your proposed project for completeness and accuracy of filing and determined it to be incomplete for processing, Attached is a list of information needed pdor to finding the application complete, non-conformities with development standards, and major design issues, Further processing of your project will begin once the Completeness Items are submitted and the application accepted as complete. We recommend that all issues on the attached list be addressed now to expedite processing of your project. Submit eight copies of the revised application to the Planning Division. The information and/or plans necessary to make the application complete must be received within 60 'days from the date of this letter. This determination of incompleteness is final unless 'appealed within 10-calendar days from the date of this letter. Only Completeness Items may be appealed at this time. A written statement of reasons for the appeal must be filed with the Planning Commission Secretary with a $62 appeal fee. Should you have any questions regarding the review process, or if we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact the project planner at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m, Sincerely, 4I~NITY DEVE, I~NT DEPARTMENT Dan'Coleman . Principal Planner DC:EW/]c Attachment cc: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning~~~ Mayor William J. Alexander Councilmember Paul Biane Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Duffon Jack Lam, AlCR City Manager ' Councilmember James V. Curatalo 10500 Civic Center Drive· RO. Box 807 * Rancho Cucarnonga, ,~1729 * (909) 477-2700 * FAX (909) 477-2849 ffxh b',¥ "D .c,.,ano o-ouoa_ oo a.co.u FILE NO.: DRC2001-00088 (COMPLETENESS COMMENTS) NOTE: This information is provided to assist in the preparation of a development package complete for processing. Additional information or comments may be necessary based upon a more thorough analysis during the Development Review Process. I. Tips for a Successful Process: A. Address Technical and Design Issues as early in the process as possible. B. Identify one person for overall cooidination between your professional design team and to serve as the key contact person with City staff. I1. Planninq Division (Emily Wimer) (909) 477-275~: A. Completeness Items - Additional information that must be submitted prior to finding the application complete: 1. Show ultimate curb face location along Roberds Street, which is to be 18 feet from centerline. 2. Show correct ultimate curb face location along Amethyst Street, which is 22 feet from centerline. 3. Show use of "existing A.C. paving" area south of building, including adjoining lot. State what your intentions are for improvements to this area. If you intend to keep using for parking, then it must be improved to meet all City Codes, such as parking aisle, striping, landscaping, and lighting. 4. Show location of public entrances to building, and any service entrances or loading docks. · B. Technical issues - The following preliminary technical issues are minimum code requirements, which must be satisfied before the project can be recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. It is recommended that these issues be addressed in the revised plans: 1. A minimum 5-foot wide landscape planter is required around entire perimeter. 2. Extend landscaping across northeast property lines and remove handicapped parking stall. 3. Add note that all parking spaces shall be double striped. 4. Provide planter areas, which are consistent with the approved planters on-site. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every three parking spaces. Trees shall also be planted adjacent to building (north, south) at an equivalent of one tree per 30 linear feet of building (which would be 3 trees each on north and south sides of building). SAM AND LORA IFTIKHAR DRC2001-00088 - COMPLETENESS COMMENTS April 5, 2001 Page ;! 5. Provide a 6-foot wide planter at the end of parking spaces in central triangular area. This can be accomplished be relocating two southernmost spaces (see attached sketch). 6. Provide wheel stops for parking areas, which do not have.a 5-foot planter. 7. Provide lighting at a minimum of one-foot candle throughout the parking area. Provide detail and elevations of the type of lighting, not to exceed 15 feet in height. 8. Provide detail of wrought iron fencing that will surround the parking area. Wrought iron shall be painted to match existing gates. 9. As a local/collector streets, both Roberds Street and Amethyst Avenue require a 35-foot average, not less than 25 feet, landscape setback (as measured from ultimate curb face). Revise plans to address this setback. The minimum-parking setback is 25 feet; however, the average landscape setback must be maintained by increasing landscape setback to 45 feet elsewhere along same street frontage. 10. Provide any combination of berming, shrub row, and 3 ~-foot high decorative walls to screen parking areas fr.om public view (i.e., from Roberds Street and Amethyst Avenue, and the future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail to the west). 11. Delete the northernmost parallel parking space, because it is impossible for vehicles to get in or out of space due to adjoining perpendicular parking space blocking access. 12. A minimum of 1-foot candle power lighting is required for security and safety. Lights shall be designed to reflect away from residential use. Light standards (i.e., poles) shall not exceed 15 feet in overall height. C. Desiqn Issues - The following are preliminary design issues that are recommended to be addressed in the revised plans: 1. Planning Commission requested that public entrance to building be relocated to north side for convenience of customers. 2. Redesign entrance to parking lot. The awkward angles around corner of building create bottleneck so that two vehicles cannot successfully negotiate at same time. Shift driveway to the east to avoid building corner. 3. A walkway shall be provided from the parking area to the entrance of the building. 4. Provide screening of the parking areas form public view. 5. Planters shall be fully landscaped in accordance with the Landscaping requirements for General Commercial Districts. SAM AND LORA IFTIKHAR DRC2001-00088 - COMPLETENESS COMMENTS April 5, 2001 Page 3 II1. Enqineerinq Division - (Vicki Chilliki) (909) 477-27401 ext.4010: A. Completeness: 1. Show street right-of way dimensions, showing both existing and ultimate right-of- way and improvement cross-sections, for both Amethyst and Roberds Streets. Include the parkway areas, and the location of the proposed new on-site fencing behind the parkway on Amethyst Street. 2. Show the existing driveway locations on both sides of the streets within 300 feet of the site, ad the proposed new driveway on Roberds Street. 3. Plot the existing overhead utilities and type, (per the attached Overhead Utility handout). B. Development Conditions/Comments: 1. Roberds Street frontage shall be fully improved to current city "Local Street" standards, as required, including, curb gutter, NC, parkway trees, sidewalk, and a commercial driveway approach. Install two 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, and R26 "No Parking Anytime" signs, to be posted on Roberds Street frontage. 2. Amethyst Street frontage'to be .fully improved to current City "Collector Street" standards, as required, including, curb gutter, NC, commercial drive approach, sidewalk, parkway trees, two 5800 Lumen streetlights, and R26 "No Parking Anytime" signs along the frontage of Amethyst Street. 3. The property owner will sign a consent and waiver to join the appropriate Lighting and Landscaping Districts to be filed with the City Engineer, prior to permit issuance and approval. IV. Buildinq and Safety Division - (Allen Brock) (909) 477-2710, ext. 4200: If the project is approved, then the following plan check requirements will apply: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSIATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) A. General Requirements: 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Floor Plan; c. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; d. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and e. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans./,~/~ SAM AND LORA IFTIKHA DRC2001-00088 - COMPLETENESS COMMENTS April 5, 2001 Page ,4 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Amhitect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. B. Site Development: 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 4. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). C. New Structures: 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for all applicable accessibility requirements, including but not limited to, parking, path of travel, access, etc. 2. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. D. Grading: 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work./~/~ .,,.BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER PHASING PLAN -' ESTIMATED ESTIMATED DATES: DURATION FROM TO 1. Grading of parking lot 1 Week 07/12/01 07/19/01 2. Trenching, etc., for site underground development (I.e., plumbing/sprinklers, electrical/lighting) 2 Weeks 07/23/01 08/06/01 3. Construction of new landscape planters, curbs, gutters 3 Weeks 08/07/01 08/28/01 4. Finish grading and construct trash enclosure 1 Week 08/29/01 09/05/01 ~ 5. A.C. paving ----, a.) Place base 1 Week 09/06/01 09/13/01 ~ b.) Pave 1 Week 09/14/01 09/21/01 c.) Stripe Parking 1 Week 09/24/01 09/30/01 6. Install landscaping with sprinklers 2 Weeks 10/01/01 10/15/01 7. Install lighting 1 Week 10/16/01 10/23/01 8. Install new masonry pillars and wrought iron fencing. 3 Weeks 10/24/01 11/14/01 9. Demo and construction of new street improvements 8 Weeks 11/15/01 01/18/02 * NOTE: Time periods for separate trades may overlap. BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER PHASING PLAN JUL 09-15 I JUL t6-22 I JUL 23-29 I JUL 30-AUG 05 J AUG 0{ I MT W TH F S S M T W TH F S $ M T W TH F S S M 1. Grading ofparkinglot 1Week X X X X X X X X 2. Trenching, etc., for site underground development (!.e., plumbing/sprinklers, electrical/lighting) 2 Weeks X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XlX 3. Construction of new landscape planters, curbs, gutters 3 Weeks 4. Finish grading and construct trash enclosure 1 Week X 5. A.C. paving a.) Place base 1 Week b.) Pave 1 Week c.) Stripe Parking 1 Week 6. Install landscaping with sprinklers 2Weeks 7. Install lighting 1 Week 8. Install new masonry pillars and wrought iron fencing 3 Weeks 9. Demo and construction of new street improvements 8 Weeks * NOTE: Time periods for separate trades may overlap. F S S M T WTH F S ~'M T WTH F S S M T WTH F S S M T WTH F S $ M T WTH F S S M T WTH F $ S M T WTH F S ~-M OCT01~7 ~ OCT08-14 ~ OCTt5-21 [ OCT22-28 [ OCT 29 - NOV 04 [ NOV05-11 ~ NOV12-18 ~ 'NOV19-2~ T WTH F S S M T WTH F S S M T WTH F S S M T WTH F S = ~, ~ ~; ~n r = = ~ I w IH r S ~ M T WTH F S S M T WTH F XXXX XX XXXXXX XX --~ XXXXXXXX i XXXX XX X X XX XX XX X XXX X~X X X XX~XXXXXX ~ J NOV 26 - DEC 02 IDEC03'DEC091OECI0-DEC161DECI7-b~...,,~iu~.,,c.~~u=~..3uI DEC31-JAI~IJI~I JAN 07 - JAN131JAN14 - JAN 20 : S S M T WTH F S S M TWTHF S S M TWTHF S S M TWTHF S S M TWTHF S S M TWTHF S S M TWTHF S S M TWTHF S S xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxlxlxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUSPENDING REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-08, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND' MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-092-08 A. Recitals. 1. Sam and Lora Iftakar filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 98-08, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of January 2001, the Planning Commission determined there was sufficient evidence to warrant a hearing on a proposed revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 3. On the 14th day of February 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the revocation or modification of the Conditional Use Permit and rendered a decision finding that the Conditional Use Permit is not being conducted in an appropriate manner, and that modifications to conditions were necessary and continued the matter to February 28, 2001. 4. On the 28th date of February 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the revocation or modification and rendered a decision finding that the applicant had demonstrated a good faith effort to modify the property for conformance, and continued the matter to April 25, 2001. 5. On the 25th day of April 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the matter to May 23, 2001. 6. On the 17th day of May 2001, the City Planner deemed the application for a new parking lot as complete. 7. On the 23rd day of May 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded that the applicant has shown sufficient evidence that no revocation is necessary. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds 'that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on May 23, 2001, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER May 23, 2001 Page 2 a. The application applies to property located at 9456 Roberds Street with a street frontage of 263.4 feet, and lot depth of 206.3 feet, which is presently improved with a 24,258 square foot warehouse facility, 14 standard parking spaces and 2 handicapped spaces; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is residential, the property to the south consists of commercial uses, the property to the east is a Southern Pacific Railway easement, and the property to the west is a 7-Eleven service station; and c. The application contemplated the establishment of a wholesale business in a General Commercial District; and d. On May 26, 1998, the City of Rancho Cucamonga granted a business license for warehouse use only comprised of the 1st floor, which has expanded to both floors; and e. On July 7, 1998, the Planning Division approved a parking plan for 14 spaces with the potential for 10 more spaces; and f. On August 23, 1998, the Planning Division denied a Business Ucense for retail use. Since December 1998, the owners have continually operated a retail business with the required permits; and g. On June 21, 1999, the applicant submitted a ne~ :3usiness License application indicating some retail use; and h. On July 1, 1999, the Planning Division issued a Business License correction letter, which stated the permitted use was for a "product storage warehouse" pursuant to the approved Conditional Use Permit; and i. The applicant has demonstrated good faith in submitting an application (Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00088) to address the outstanding issues and provided documentation of phasing plans and revised the parking lot to include the required standards; and j. On May 17, 2001, the Planning Division deemed Conditional Use Permit DRC2001- 00099 application for expansion of a parking area complete. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. If Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00088 is approved with conditions, then the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the use with sufficient parking is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Deyelopment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. If Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00088 is approved with conditions, then the continued operation of the existing uses, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare and would not be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. If Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00088 is approved with conditions, then the continued operation of the existing uses complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 98-08 - BASELINE BARGAIN CENTER May 23, 2001 Page 3 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby suspends the revocation of Conditional Use Permit 98-08, pending the final outcome of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00088. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman A'FI'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularty introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: THE CITY OF ]~ANCHO CI.)CAHONGA Staff Report DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner Ruben Warren, Planning Aide SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 94-02 - KOFFEE KLATCH - A compliance review of the Entertainment Permit for Koffee Klatch in the Specialty Commemial District, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 208-101-23. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this public hearing is to take evidential testimony and determine whether the business is operating in a manner consistent with the Entertainment Ordinance and whether there is a need to modify the conditions of approval to ensure that the business is a good neighbor. BACKGROUND: In Mamh of 2001, City staff received several calls from the business owner of Thomas Winery Liquor, Mr. Barba, complaining about nuisance problems coming from Koffee Klatch. On March 21,2001, staff received a letter from Mr. Barba describing the nuisance problems as shown in Exhibit "B." Staff also spoke with the business owner of Amy's Garden who confirmed some of the nuisance problems. During this time, staff also has received a request of an annual renewal of the Entertainment Permit from Koffee Klatch as required by the Municipal Code. Based on the complaints received and with the annual renewal request, the City Planner determined that a compliance hearing would be appropriate for the Entertainment Permit. ANALYSIS: A. Approved Use and Entertainment: In June of 1994, Mr. Mike Perry of Koffee Klatch received approval of an Entertainment Permit. The approved entertainment consists of live music performances Monday through Friday between 7:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., and Saturday and Sunday between 1:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Koffee Klatch is allowed to have live entertainment outdoors, which is limited to the north side of the building as shown in Exhibit "C." A copy of the approval with conditions is attached as Exhibit "E." ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EP 94-02 - KOFFEE KLATCH May 23, 2001 Page 2 B. Compatibility of Use and Public Safety Concerns: The granting of the Entertainment Permit requires the business establishment not to operate in a manner contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; not to be operated in an improper or disorderly manner; and not to create public nuisance. Besides the above-mentioned pertinent provisions of the Entertainment Ordinance, a condition of approval for the entertainment stated that if the business operation causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses, the Planning Commission may suspend or revoke the permit. As part of the compliance review, this section of the report will examine the evidence and determine if there is a need to modify the conditions of approval so as to comply with the Entertainment Ordinance and the conditions of approval as follows: 1. Summary of Nuisance Problems: in his letter, Mr. Barda cited loitering in the parking lot close to his business, fighting, "burning rubber" in the parking lot, and rude and un-hygienic behavior from teenagers. Mr. Barda stated that because his business is a liquor store, he must follow strict rules from Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) including the prohibition of loitering in the parking lot around his business. 2. Police Response: The list from the Police Call History for the site (8916 Foothill Boulevard) between April 2000 and April 2001 shows a total of 29 calls, which is substantial, see Exhibit "F." However, the bulk of the calls are directly or indirectly coming from the former nightclub '"]'he Club Matrixx," which ceased operation and moved out by mid-October of 2000. Between late October 2000 and April 2001, there were a total of 6 calls, which would be directly or indirectly related to Koffee Klatch. The calls range from an audible alarm, loitering, a transient problem, and calls that did not need to file a police report. According to police staff, the number of calls from Koffee Klatch is normal and is not unusually high. 3. Compatibility of Use: Koffee Klatch is within a leased space of 1,300 square feet and the Floor Plan is as shown in Exhibit "D." Because there is large patio to the north side of the building, Koffee Klatch has used the area for outdoor live music. Patio tables and chairs are provided in the area but without any Iow walls, fences, or planters to delineate or define it. Businesses immediately around Koffee Klatch consist of office, Chianti Restaurant, Amy's Gardens, Thomas Winery Liquor store, and The Wild Grape. Both the liquor store and the restaurant are open until 10:00 or 11:00 p.m., while The Wild Grape is open to 9:00 or 9:30 p.m. with craft classes. Amy's Garden closes at 7:00 p.mo In 1996, Mr. Perry, in response to noise complaints, took measures to reodent the per[ormers to help reduce sound levels and agreed to continuously monitor the sound level. As a result of the recent complaints, staff paid a visit to Koffee Klatch on April 7. However, the band that was to play that night had cancelled. On April 28, staff paid another visit to the site where there was a band playing at the north patio area. Staff observed that there were approximately 35 patrons attuned to the band and about 4 or 5 individuals loitering around the north side of the Winery building. C. Conclusions: Because there is an existing liquor store close by and patrons of both businesses share the use of the parking area north of the Thomas Winery building, the probability of patrons from Koffee Klatch to be tempted to buy liquor or cigarettes is there. Perhaps the problems of loitering or individuals trying to obtain liquor or cigarettes could be reduced if employees from Koffee Klatch would periodically serve as security personnel PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EP 94-02 - KOFFEE KLATCH May 23, 2001 Page $ around the patio area for monitoring their patrons to discourage loitering and any other potential nuisance problems. Therefore, staff recommends that the conditions of approval for Entertainment Permit be modified to require Koffee Klatch to have an employee in the patio area when live entertainment is occurring or when 50 or more patrons are present for monitoring the outside crowd and discouraging them from creating nuisance problems. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properties and tenants within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the determination that additional conditions of approval are needed to ensure Koffee Klatch complies with the Entertainment Ordinance through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullor City Planner BB:NF:RW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Complaint Letter from Mr. Barba dated March 21,2001 Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan and Patio Plan Exhibit "D" - Interior Floor Plan Exhibit "E" - Resolution No. 94-60 Exhibit "F" - Call History Resolution of Approval of Modification to Entertainment Permit 94-02 Thomas Winery Liquor 8045 Vineyard Ave. Suite I-8 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RECEIVED March 21, 2001 ~I~,R 2 1 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~ Nancy Fong City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cornmision Department Nancy Fong: I am writting this letter as a concern regarding the permit that can be issued to the Coffee Klatch for entertainment. I have been speaking to Ruben(in planning) and Art(in code enfomement) regarding the problems I am having with the crowd in the parking lot of my business,Thomas Winery Liquor located at 8045 Vineyard Ave. Suite I-8 Rancho Cucamonga. On the same nights they are having live music outside in the rear of their business which, shares the same parking lot as us. The problems we are having are the following: Parking lot is being filled with teenagers with no supervision, listening to the band. Loiterifig, sitting in and on their vehicles in the parking lot, listening to the band. Fighting, buming rubber(doing, "donuts") in the parking lot. Harassing our help at the liquor store because, we refused to sell liquor and cigaretts to minors. We have refused service to one specific lady (wears Dodgers jacket) who buys cigaretts and liquor to the teenagers who are at the Coffee Klatch. All the parking lot is taken up with people from the Coffee Klatch. All our 5 min parking in front of our business is constantly occupied by the Coffee Klatch customer's. When we advise them to move to another parking, it becomes a big problem (provanity and vulgar statements are made to our help). We have unsupervised teenagers that are hanging around listening to the music, they are urinating in the bushes. This is occuring in front of the Chiropractors office, and also between the building of the business Amy's Garden and doctors office. This has been a constant problem since I purchased Thomas Winery Liquor in mid December. For my business to comply with the A.B.C License Department there are rules that I must abide by. One rule states that there shall be no loitering in the parking lot of my business Thomas Winery Liquor. Also the other business next to and across from the Coffee Klatch have been having similar problems. The business Amy's Garden has experienced problems such as finding that some one has left bowel movements in her flower planters next to her entrance of her store. You can contact Beth at (909) 987-4004 for her concerns regarding these occurences in front of her store. There are no adequate restrooms, parking, and also no security for the crowd that listens to the bands at the Coffee Klatch. About 5-6 weeks ago I had to break up a fight in front of my store. One of the Christian band members smacked a girl in the face with a gatorade bottle. I called 911 for the police to come, I held the guy till they got there,they got there in 14 mins. The band members came out to vouch for the kid, and the gift didn't want to press charges so they let him go. Enclosing this letter I am asking for your help in regarding this problem. On 03-20-01 my sister that works the store contacted me, said that the owner of the Coffee Klatch, Mike Perry was there looking for me. She said that he was very mdc asking, what seems to be the problem". When she proceeded to tell him, his reply was, "If you don't like what you see then call the police". She asked him to leave the store, because he was so mdc. I arrived at the store approximately 20 min. later. I called Mr. Perry on the phone and asked him to meet me in front so we can talk. I expressed to him all my concerns that are in this letter. Mr. Peru's reply to me was,"If you don't like it call the police, I don't know who you think you are I have been here seven years and no one has complained yet". He repeatedly told me what comes around goes around, and that I better watch out. I took that as a threat. I am going to c/c the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, City Managers office,Code Enforcement Department as well as my attorney Rocky Crabb. Your quick response in this matter is greatly appreciated. Please feel free to contact me at (909) 428-1115. I would appreciate if you would contact the surrounding business's. So you can see I'm not the only business who see's these problems. Best Regards, Richard Barba, owner ~c;Rancho Cucamonga Police Dept. City Managers Office Code Enforcement Dept. Law Offices of Rocky Crabb Mayor's Office Summit Team, Inc. ZENDEJA$ 12,506.75 SF x' ~,: "' VINEYARD AVENUE FLOOR PLAN Door Eland Area sales area l~C~ Scatin - ~-01 area restroom NOTE: There is no stage, band. a.n.d seating area vary, depend,ng on size of band. RESOLUTION NO. 94-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PE]~MIT NO. 94-02, TO OPERATE AND CONDUCT ENTERTAINMENT SY PROVIDING VARIOUS TYPES OF LIVE MUSIC FOR THE COFFEE KLATCH, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-101-23. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. On March 17, 1994, Cynthia' and Mike Perry filed an application for the issuance of an Entertainment Permit (EP 94-02) described above in the title of this Resolution. 3. On the 22nd day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga aa follows= 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Conm~ission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 22, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue on a lot presently improve~ with structures and parking areas which constitutes the Thomas Winery Plaza; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated office Professional and is presently vacant, the property to the south is designated Community commercial, the property to the west ia vacant and the site of the proposed Smith's Food and Drug, and the property to the east is an existing commercial center; and c. The Coffee Klatch is a cappuccino bar serving coffee, espresso, and dessert. The proposal ia to provide musical entertainment on Thursdays from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., Fridays and Saturdays from 8=00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and possibly nightly during summer and holiday season and Sunday afternoons. pLANNING COMMISSIO SOLUTION NO. 94-60 EP 94-02 - COFFEE K~ATCH June 22, 1994 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this commission during-the above-referenced June 22, 1994, public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby 'finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following conditions: ~vision l) This approval is only for live music performances. Any change of intensity of entertainment shall require application for modification of this permit. 2) If the operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for 'the consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 3) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of entertainment operation prior to 10:O0 p.m. and 60 dB during the.hours after pLANNING COMMISSION RE UTION NO. 94-60 EP 94-02 - COFFEE KLATCH June 22, 1994 Page 3 4) Outdoor entertainment shall be limited in location to south or west of the still building and west of the dutch door on the adjacent business. An exhibit shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 5) Hours of operation for the entertainment use shall be Monday through Friday evenings from 7:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. and Saturdays and Sundays from noon to 1:00 a.m. 6) This permit shall be renewed annually per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE 1994. ATTE S T: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Co~ission of the City of Rancho Cuc~onga, do hereby cedi fy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and re~larly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning co~ission of the City of Rancho ~c~onga, at a regular meeting of the Planning co~ission held on the 22nd day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CO~ISSIO~RS: B~R, LUMPP, MCNIEL, ~LC~R, TOLS~Y NOES: CO~ISSIONERS ~ NONE ABSENT: CO~ISSIONERS: NONE CALL HISTORY From 04/01/2000 Thru 04/24/2001 Date / Timo inH~al type final call type incident # iocetJon: clispo: report number 05/14/200002:10:13 415F PC242 TRU ASSAULT REPORT RC001350030 8916 FOOTHILL Report To Follow 110004981 05/21/2000 01:55:01 iNFO INFO TRU INFORMATION REPORT RC001420043 8916 FOOTHILL BL ~4(1 Cancelled 06/18/200000:46:57 BOMB PC148 BOMB THREAT RC001700017 8916 FOOTHILL N-r~=ry Acfion Taken 06/29/2000 23:06:35 AOD AOD ASSIST OTHER DEPARTMENT RC001810249 8916 FOOTHILL Assist AnotherAgency ,07/0Z/2000 01:23:43 459VR PC459 TRU VEHICLE BURGLARY REPORT RC001840027 8916 FOOTHILL Cancelled 07/02/2000 12:04:16 TRUVCC PC459 TRU VEHICLE BURGLARY REPORT RC001840099 8916 FOOTHILL Report To Follow 110006936 08/09/2000 20:38:10 647E PC647E LOITERING RC002220236 8916 FOOTHILL Service Rendered 38/24/2000 21:29:39 594 PC594 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF LESS $1000 RC002370225 8916 FOOTHILL BL No Report Desired 08/28/2000 12:57:48 647E PC647E LOITERING RC002410091 8916 FOOTHILL NecessaryActJon Taken 09/05/2000 19:08:18 Co47E PC647E LOITERING RC002490252 8916 FOOTHILL Cancelled 10/02/2000 18:50:14 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC002760215 8916 FOOTHILL BL Cancelled f'~16/31/2000 12:14:08 INFO INFO TRU INFORMATION REPORT RC003050134 8916 FOOTHI ,, '1.1[~4t2000~1~!~15:20!~":6~,,~E,~/~.' :~ P rr(~7E:~:.~I~O,I;T,ER. I ~!~.~? ;?!/B~0q3;~iO__.~i!:~!~: ~[~. ,.~ , 12/31/2000 08:39:50 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC003660059 8916 FOOTHILL Net-~.~y Action Taken 03/21/2001 14:30:50, TRUVCC TELEPHONE REPORT TYPE VALLEY RC010800173 8916 FOOTHILL BL Necessary Action Taken _ A)/~ .~'~_.,/~A~7 r. e:~cadlogs~logs2000,md b, Address DelaiLaddress select Page I of I Wednesday, April 25, 2001 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 94-02, IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 208-101-23. A. Recitals. 1. On June 22, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 94-60 and approved Entertainment Permit 94-60. 2. Following the receipt of a complaint on March 21,2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed hearing on May 23, 2001, took public testimony, and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headng on May 23, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. On March 21, 2001, a complaint was received regarding nuisance problems including loitering. b. Koffee Klatch is in close proximity to a liquor store and both businesses share the use of the parking area. c. To provide compatibility of uses for both businesses, there is a need to define the use of the outdoor patio with live entertainment and to have monitoring of patrons outside so as to avoid potential nuisance problems. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. b. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 94-02 - KOFFEE KLATCH May 23, 2001 Page 2 c. The applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. d. The granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not create a public nuisance. e. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center. f. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of matedal fact in the required application. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the modification of Entertainment Permit 94~02 subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Division 1) All conditions of approval contained in Resolution 94-60 shall apply. 2) An employee shall be in the outdoor patio area when live entertainment is occurring or 50 or more patrons are present to monitor the outside crowd and discourage patrons from creating nuisance problems. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 85/23/2001 16:38 969-987-5917 RANCHO C~ PAGE 82 Beth Amheiser ~my~ ~ara~ 8057 Vineyard Avenue Rancho Cueamonga, CA 91730 May 23, 2001 Gail Sanchez Planning Diviaion City of Rancho Cucamonga P,O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Gall Sanchez: This is regarding the Entorteinment Permit for Koffee Klatch. I apologize for the last minute letter but I am unable to attend tonight's meeting and I wanted to make sure the City is aware of my concerns. I am the owner of ,R~r~!/~- ~;¢z~'~8/t and I sm located directly behind Koffee Klatch. I am well aware of the problems associated with entertainment at the Koffee Klatch. The Koffee Klatch has a reputation of providing Christian music end entertainment to Christian crowds. This was true at one time, but after the close of Matrix, the Klatch stepped out and l~ied something new. They expanded their format to include rook groups and problems began. However, since recent complaints, the format has returned to the original Christian/blues/soft music format of which t have no objection. I enjoy and appreciate most of what they offer. The fact they now include rock bands is truly not the issue. When they provide folk, jazz, blues or Christian music, the crowd ia usually pretty r~specfful end contained. It is evident from wal~hlng the crowd, that most people there are patronizing Koffee Klatch and there are usually no problems. Within the last several months, on the nights when the rock groups ara present, the~e is a dramatic shift in the makeup of the crowd, it's a much younger crowd. I have watched parents drive up to the back of the Klatch and unload three to four teenagers and drive off. Perhaps the parents are under the impression that a Christian group is playing and they feel confident their teen will conduct themselves in a Christianly manner, but that is not always the case. One of the problems J see ia that' on these occassions, the crowd tends to gat quits large, there are s lot of unsupervised teens, and fights have Ixoken out in the adjacent parking lot. Because of the lack of security and crowd control, it can get pretty rowdy, 85/23/2001 1B:30 089-987-5917 RANCHO CHANI~ER PAGE 03 All tenants of the Thomas Winery Plaza pay common area fees. Part of these fees are used to provide on-site security TO ALL TENANTS. The current schedule for security is everyday from 6:30 PM until 9:30 PM. The music usually seems to start around 7:00 and usually continues after the guard goes home. The guard's job is to patrol the entire complex and the guard does not work for any one tenant. Therefore, I think it is unreasonable to expect every tenant in the Plaza to pay a security guard to watch the crowd attracted to the Klatch while the rest of the Plaza is ignored. Another serious problem is the fact that the Klatch does not have restreom facilities to accommodate the crowd they attract. This is a serious problem. Where do they all go when they need to relieve themselves? I'll tell you what several young men do. They llne up against the outside well of and use it as a urinal. I have seen this on several occasions. In addition, those who feel the need, have defecated in the planters. This is not acceptable. Koffee Klatch maintains that the people who cause the fights and urinate against my building are not part of their crowd or patrons. They maintain that they have no control over these people and their actions and should not be responsible for them. Men urinating against the building and the unusually large crowds don't occur every night, but it seems to be the norm when certain bends ara booked. The large rowdy crowds and the building being used as a urinal go hand in hand with the rock bands. I think a reasonable and fair solution to these issues is to expect Koffee Klatch to provide their own crowd control, which includes patrolling the premises to prevent the Plaza from beooming a public urinal. Perhaps portable toilets may be the answer. But crowd control is a must and I don't think the rest of the tenants should be responsible for the additional burden. If you have any questions, please call me st 987-4004. I will be there until 7:30 tonight. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, ra t's 6arden MT2M ,.o.~o~,~ Alta Loma, CA 91701 (empty tomb) (909) 945-9969 Co~ee K~atch Coffee Klatch Custom Coffee Roasters ~.~ ~ 8916 Foothill Bird Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Dear Register voters, The City of Rancho Cucamonga is having a hearing to consider the future of entertainment at the Coffee Klatch. ' If you believe the Coffee Klatch should be able to continue hosting live entertainment as is, please add your name below. If not, contact the City or come to the hearing. Respectfully yours, Michael Perry Coffee Klatch THE CITY OF i~AN CIi 0 CIJCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRGVGPAO1-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend vadous sections of the Victoda Community Plan for consistency with the Victoda Arbors Master Plan and the Mixed Use land use designation. BACKGROUND: On March 21,2001, the City Council approved the Victoda Arbors Master Plan as a revision to the Victoda Community Plan. On March 28, 2001, the Planning Commission directed staff to proceed with appropriate amendments that would align all standards in the Victoda Community Plan with the recently adopted elements of the Arbor Master Plan. ANALYSIS: The proposed "clean up" items consist of incorporating the Arbors Master Plan provisions, where appropriate, throughout the Regulations and Standards Development section for intemal consistency as follows: A. Residential Development Standards: Add a new Mixed Use section to the Residential Development Standards. Since the City has changed the land use and zoning for Victoda Arbors to a Mixed Use designation, it is appropriate to add a section regarding uses and development standards within a Mixed Use zone. · "Mixed Use - Development within any Mixed Use area must be in conformance with an adopted master plan that established development standards specifically for the defined mixed use area. (a) The Village of Victoda Arbors shall be in conformance with the adopted provisions of the Victoda Arbors Master Plan." B. Commercial Development Standards: The approval of the Victoda Master Plan included a list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses contained in the Victoda Community Plan and included those uses listed under the General Commercial and Neighborhood Commercial Zones of the Development Code. It has been a goal of the City Planner to eventually consolidate and provide consistency among the many Community Plans and Specific Plans that the City has in place. In fact, when uses are not listed in the Victoda Community Plan, ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCVCPA 01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 23, 2001 Page 2 staff refers back to the Development Code for review. Therefore, the changes proposed below are to provide some internal consistency among the Victoda Arbors Master Plan, the Development Code, and Victoria Community Plan. 1. Reqional Center and Reqional Related Zones: · Add uses to Section (a) - "Permitted Uses listed under General Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030." · Add uses to Section (b) - "Conditionally Permitted Uses listed under General Commercial in Development Code 17.10.030." · Move the "Automobile Service Facilities" in the Regional Related Zone from a permitted to a conditionally permitted use, consistent with Regional Center Zone and the automotive uses in the Development Code. 2. Villaqe Commercial Zone: · Add uses to Section (a) - "Permitted Uses listed under Neighborhood Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030." · Add uses to Section (b)-"Conditionally Permitted Uses listed under Neighborhood Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030." C. Community Facilities: Adding the description of the histodc winery site reinforces the community sentiment of preserving the winery and is consistent with the Victoda Arbors Master Plan. Staff also added Recreation Vehicle and Mini-Storage to this section since there is an existing Recreational Vehicle and Mini-Storage facility within the Planned Community. · Add the following uses to Section (b) (2)-" Historic winery consisting of manufacturing, pressing, blending and bottling of wine, including accessory uses such as, but not limited to, vineyards, retail sales, wine tasting, banquet facility, restaurants, and other uses as found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit or intent of a historic winery site; and Recreation Vehicles and Mini-Storage." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending approval of the Victoda Community Plan Amendment to the City Council as shown in the attached proposed Ordinance. '~Brad Bull~r City Planner Attachments: Resolution Recommending Approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-02 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-02, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AND THE MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 01-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of May 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 23, 2001, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not confiict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DRCVCPA01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 23, 2001 Page 2 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the subject amendment identified in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRCVCPA01-02 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T'. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRCVCPA01-02, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AND THE MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. .Recitals. 1. On December 20, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the Victoria Arbors Master Plan by the adoption of Ordinance No. 648. 2. On May 23, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-02 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. , recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 3. On ,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: .SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. .SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The following Victoria Community Plan, Part 3 Regulation and Standards Development, and Commemial Standards sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures, as written below: 1. The following shall be added as Section 2.a (11 ) of the Regional Center Commercial Standards: (11 ) Permitted uses listed under General Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030. 2. The following shall be added to Section 2.b of the Regional Center Commercial Standards and the uses listed under this section shall be re-numbered accordingly: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRCVCPA 01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 23, 2001 Page 2 Conditionally permitted uses listed under General Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030. 3. The following shall be added to Section 3.a of the Regional Related Commercial Standards and the uses listed under this section shall be re-numbered accordingly: Permitted uses listed under General Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030. 4. The Regional Related Commercial Standards section shall be modified by moving · the "Automobile Service Facilities" from Section 3a to Section 3b 5. The following shall be added to Section 3.b of the Regional Related Commercial Standards and the uses listed under this section shall be re-numbered accordingly: Conditionally permitted uses listed under General Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030. 6. The following shall be added as Section 4.a (7) of the Village Commercial Standards: (7) Permitted uses listed under Neighborhood Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030. 7. The following shall be added as Section 4.b (8) of the Village Commercial Standards: (8) Conditionally permitted uses listed under Neighborhood Commercial in Development Code Section 17.10.030. 8. The following shall be added as Section 7, Mixed Use, of the Residential Development Standards section: (7) Mixed Use - Development within any Mixed Use area must be in conformance with an adopted master plan that establishes development standards specifically for the defined mixed use area: (a)· The Village of Victoria Arbors shall be in conformance with the adopted provisions of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. 9. The following shall be added to Section L 2, Community Facilities section: (k) Historic winery consisting of manufacturing, pressing, blending and bottling of wine, including accessory uses such as, but not limited to, vineyards, retails sales, wine tasting, banquet facility, restaurants, and other uses as found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit or intent of a historic winery site. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRCVCPA 01-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 23, 2001 Page 3 (I) RV Vehicle and Mini-Storage. SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. THE CITY OF I~AN C Il 0 CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2001-00258 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A review of the proposed site acquisition of .34 acre of land for expansion of Etiwanda Intermediate School, located in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 13004 Victoda Avenue, approximately 400 feet west of Pecan Avenue - APN: 227-253-11 and the westerly portion of 10. ABSTRACT: Under State law, the Office of the State Architect has authority to review and approve new school facilities. In order "to promote the safety of pupils and comprehensive community planning," the school district is required to receive a report from the Planning Commission before acquiring title to properly for a new school site. The Planning Commission is required to inves~tigate the proposed site and detail its recommendations concerning acquisition of the site in writing. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North Single Family Home, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing Etiwanda Intermediate School East Single Family Home, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acm) West Single Family Home, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acm) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - School Site East Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. Site Characteristics: The .34-acre site is currently used as a gravel parking lot and is surrounded by residential development to the north, east, and west. To the south of the site is Etiwanda Intermediate School. The site is fenced off with 6-foot chain link fencing on all sides except for the north side where there is a 6-foot block wall. There is a concrete drive approach and them am overhead utility lines (see Exhibit "D"). ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001 - 00258 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT May 23, 2001 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The Etiwanda School District is proposing to buy the .34 acre site immediately north of the existing school to accommodate increased staff parking demand. The site is separated from the existing school by Victoria Avenue. Access into the site is from Victoria Avenue. This is a small remnant parcel, which is too small, and on the wrong side of the street, for a permanent parking solution for the school. B. Technical Issues: Planninq Division 1. The school district should ultimately pursue a permanent parking lot on, or adjoining, the school property. 2. If the school distdct does not purchase the property, but simply continues to use the site for parking, the parking lot requires a Minor Development Review subject to a $296 fee. The Minor Development Review will require the submittal of a detailed Site Plan and Hazardous Waste Statement. 3. The parking lot setback from Victoria Avenue shall be a minimum of 15 feet. 4. The parking lot and especially the street front should be landscaped compatible with the neighborhood. En.qineedn.q Division 1. Install the missing public improvements across the property frontage to City collector street standards. These include: sidewalk, street trees, one streetlight, signage and striping to the City Engineer's approval. 2. Revise existing street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 3. Security shall be posted, and as agreed, executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to issuance of a City building permit. 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 5. Process a Lot Line Adjustment or obtain property rights to the westerly portion of the adjacent property (Assessor's Parcel #229-253-10). C. Desiqn and Technical Review Committees: This project was not reviewed bythe Design or Technical Review Committees. However, plans were sent to various City departments for rev Jew. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001 - 00258 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT May 23, 2001 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the project and forward any comments to the Etiwanda School District for consideration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:WM~Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Assessors Parcel Map Exhibit "C" - Etiwanda School District Letter Exhibit "D" - Site Photo PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2001-00258 Location Map 0 480 Feet ~ N Oct, ~6_~t , ''/~:'''''~ 'I~gct No. 5754,M,B ?6/ 79 ,80 Nota-Asses~r~s gl k, ~ ~t ~sessor~s Mop Tract ~o.6244,M.B.8~80.SI ~ Numbers Shown in Circles ~227, ~ge 25 San Bernordino ~unty John L. Golden, Jr. Board of Trustees Superintendent Rebecca M. Lawrence Brynna R. Cadman Assistan! Superintendent David W. Long Douglas M. Claflin Administrato[ior Business Services Mark H. Murphy Shawn Judson Administrator of Personnel Cecilia Solorio Heidi M. Soehnel Mondi M. Taylor Administrator of Special Programs 1883 P. O. Box 248, Etiwanda, California 91739 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (909) 899-2451 FAX (909) 899-9463 May 7, 2001 ~A¥ J. 0 _200] RECEIVED - PLANNIN6 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Brad Buller Re: Request to Render a Report as to the Conformity of the Etiwanda School District Potential Intermediate School Site Expansion with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Members of the Planning Commission: The Etiwanda School District is interested in the expansion of the Etiwanda Intermediate School site on the corner of Victoria Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. The District has determined that an additional 0.34 acres of property located immediately north of the approximate twenty acre Etiwanda Intermediate School will be needed for the school, primarily for parking. Attached is a map of the property to be acquired. Section 65402(c) of the Government Code and Public Resources Code section 21151.2 provide that if a general plan has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired for public purposes until such acquisition has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to the conformity with the adopted general plan. The Etiwanda School District hereby submits the request required by section 65402(c) of the California Government Code to the planning agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please contact the undersigned if yo~J have any questions. Very truly yours,._. Superintendent JLG:pl Enclosure Cc: Michael Toy Parker &.Covert LLP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRepol¢ DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Chairman a,n,d Members of th~.ing Commission FROM: William J. O Neil, City Engineer,-'~/~ BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil E~gineer SUBJECT: ENGINEERING DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/02 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Attached is the Engineering Division's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2001/02. The projects have been categorized by type of proje~zt (Beautification, Drainage, Streets, etc.), which are in alphabetical order within a category. A map showing the project locations is also attached. A summary of project costs by category is shown on the cover page. The total for all projects is $18,638,470. A few projects are dependent upon uncommitted funds from other agencies; therefore, their construction during the next year is not guaranteed at this time. This item has been reviewed and approved by the City Council Public Works Subcommittee. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments ITEM E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 20001/02 SUMMARY Beautification ......................... $ 1,o55,ooo Drainage ...................... ' .......... $ 5,011,000 Facilities ................... : ............. $ 344,090 Miscellaneous ............ : ........... $ 933,850 Parks ...................................... $ 3,636,690 Railroad Crossings ................ $ 867,000 Streets.....: ............................. $ 5,668,000 Studies ................................... $ 425,000 Traffic ..................................... $ 697,840 TOTAL ............................. $18,638,470 COMMENTS: The projects are listed in alphabetical order within each category, except for numbered streets which are in numerical order at the beginning of a section. If the account number contains an "x", a final number has not been assigned as yet. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2001/02 No. Project Fund Account Amount ($) Beautification 1 19th St - Jasper St to Hermosa Ay - Landscape south parkway. Beautification 1-110-316-5650-1318 369,000 (Design and Construct) 2 Arrow Route - Hellman Av to Archibald Av - Landscape north parkway Beautification 1-110-316~5650-1320 222,000 and Hellman Av - Arrow Route to S/O Foothill BI - Landscape east Beautification 1-110-316-5650-1319 164,000 parkway. (Design and Construct) 386,000 3 Carnelian St - 1,000' S/O Vivero to Vivero St - Landscape parkways. Beautification 1-110-316-5650-1172 300,000 (Design and Construct) Drainage Beautification Total 1,055,000 4 Carnelian St -N/O Vivero St to N/O Base Line Rd - Install master Drainage 1-112-303-5650-1291 1,300,000 plan storm drain, pavement rehabilitation, and some street Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1296 150,000 widening. (Design and Construct) 1,450,000 5 Hermosa Av - N/O Church St to N/o Base Line Rd - Install master Drainage 1-112~303-5650-1292 3,711,000 plan storm drain, pavement rehabilitation, and some street Measure I 1-176-303-5650~1301 510,000 widening. (Design and Construct) 4,221,000 Facilities Drainage Total 5,011,000 6 Senior Center (existing) - Renovation of the existing landscaping and CDBG 1-204-314-5650~1133 31,730 irrigation system. (Construct) 7 Senior Center (new) - Design new senior center. (Design) CDBG 1-204-314-5650~1329 150,000 8 Senior Center (new) - Bank funds for construction of new facility. CDBG 1-204-314-5650-1330 162,360 Facilities Total 344,090 Page 1 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2001102 No. Project Fund Account Amount ($) Miscellaneous 9 ADA Ramps and Driveways at various locations. (Design and Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1150 200,000 Construct) CDBG 1-204-314-5650-1017 24,240 Article 3 1-214-303-5650-1017 4,000 228,240 10 Developer Reimbursements - Reimburse funds to Developers for Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1026 500,000 construction of City Master planned transportation and drainage Drainage facilities. General City 1-;112-303-5650-1026 139,000 Etiwanda 1-116-303-5650-1026 20,000 11 Graffiti removal at various locations. CDBG 1-204-314-5650-1015 22,370 12 Sidewalk grinding and repairs at various locations. CDBG 1-204-314-5650-1018 24,240 Miscellaneous Total 933,850 Parks 13 Napa St - Develop soccer fields on shared parking lot area for Park Dev 1-120-305-5650-1312 2,700,000 Speedway. (Design and construct) 14 New Park - N/O Foothill BI E/O Etiwanda Av - Develop 5 acre park site. Park Dev 1-120-305-5650o1313 750,000 (Design and construct) 15 Old Town Park - Renovation of the existing tot lot. (Design and CDBG 1-204-314-5650-1327 186,690 construct) Parks Total 3,636,690 Page 2 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2001/02 No. Project Fund Account Amount ($) Railroad Crossings 16 6th St - E/O Archibald - Upgrade RXR Spur crossing. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1081 517,000 (Design and Construct) 17 Etiwanda Av - S/O Whittram Av - Upgrade SCRRA RXR crossing. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1074 350,000 (Construct) Streets Railroad Crossings Total 867,000 18 6th St ~ Hellman Av to Archibald Av - Pavement Rehabilitation. AB 2928 1-:182-303-5650-1324 260,000 (Design and Construct) 19 6th St - Archibald Ay to Hermosa Av - Pavement Rehabilitation. Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1220 155,000 (Design and Construct) 20 8th St - Grove Av to Baker St - Pavement Rehabilitation of north half Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1297 60,000 of street. (Design and Construct) 21 26th St - Center St to Haven Ay- Rehabilitate existing pavement. AB 2928 1-1 82-303-5650-1 256 (Design and Construct) 1 00,000 22 Amethyst St- N/o Rte 30 to Hillside Rd - Pavement Rehabilitation. Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1158 351,000 (Design and Construct) 23 Base Line Rd - West City Limits to Carnelian St - Pavement Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1298 10,000 Rehabilitation. (Deign only) 24 Base Line Rd - Lyon St to Hellman Av - Pavement Rehabilitation. Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1199 132,000 (Construct) 25 Base Line Rd @ 115 - Street widening and traffic Signal. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1283 500,000 (Design and Construct) 26 Base Line Rd @ 115 - RAN acquisition for future (nterchange. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1323 2,130,000 Page 3 of 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2001102 No. Project Fund Account Amount 27 Be,"~'l St - Cielito St to i9th St - Pavement Rehabilitation. Measure ~ 1~176-303-5650.1295 (Design and Construct) 95,000 28 Bus Bays - Various locations. (Design and Construct) AQMD 1-105~208-5650-1238 87,000 Article 3 1-214-303-5650-1293 33,000 120,000 29 Calle Velar - Avenida Leon to Hellman Ay and Avenida Leon - Arrow CDBG 1-204-314-5650.1328 35,000 Rte to Calle Velar - Reconstruct street and add sidewalks and street ' lights. (Design only) 30 Grove Ay - 8th St to Foothill Blvd - Pavement Rehabilitation. Measure I 1-176-303-5650.1263 (Design only) 10,000 31 Hermosa Ay - N/O Foothill BI to Effen St - Widen east side. Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1302 (Design only) 10,000 . 32 Hermosa Av - Highland Av to Banyan St - Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1299 and some street widening. (Design only) 10,000 33 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Various locations. Proposition 111 1-170-303-5650-1022 300,000 (Design and Construct) AB 2928 1-182-303-5650-1022 305,000 605,000 34 Madne Ay ~ Humboldt Av to 26th St - Pavement Rehabilitation. AB 2928 1-182-303-5650-1325 100,000 (Design and Construct) 35 Milliken Av - 4th St to 7th St - Street widening and Pavement Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1252 271,000 Rehabilitation. (Design and Construct) Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1252 400,000 Asmnt Dist 109,000 780,000 36 Summit Av - Etiwanda Av to East Av - Pavement Rehabilitation. Measure I 1-176-303-5650-1303 (Design only) 10,000 37 Terra Vista Prky - Church St to Spruce St - Pavement Rehabilitation. AB 2928 1-182-303-5650-1326 130,000 (Construct) Page, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2001/02 No. Project Fund Account Amount ($) Studies Streets Total 5,668,000 38 6th St @ 115 - Interchange project report and environmenta~ study. Transportation 1-124~303-5650-1288 350,000 39 Residential Street Traffic Management Program Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1289 75,000 Traffic Studies Total 425,000 40 Emergency traffic signal controller replacement. SB 325 1-;180-303-5650-1294 30,000 41 Emergency vehicle preemption system for the Rte 210 traffic signals, Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1160 12,000 year4ofa 5year program. (Design and construct) 42 Interconnect traffic signals on Base Line Rd from Alta Cuesta Dr to Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1290 220,000 Spruce Ay. (Design and construct) signals - no specific location. SB 325 1-180-303-5650-1103 20,840 43 Interconnect traffic 44 Rehabilitate traffic signal internally illuminate street name signs. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1251 20,000 (Design and construct) 45 Signal - 19th St at Archibald Av - Install left turn phase. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1286 50,000 (Design and construct) 46 Signal - Carnelian at La Vine - Install left turn phase. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1281 25,000 (Design and construct) 47 Signal - Etiwanda Av at Victoria St - Install traffic signal. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1285 130,000 (Design and construct) 48 Signal - Etiwanda Av at Etiwanda Intermediate School - Install pedes- Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1287 60,000 trian crossing signal. (Design and construct) 49 Signal - Milliken Av at Vintage Dr - Install traffic signal. Transportation 1-124-303-5650-1253 47,000 (Design and construct) SB 325 1-180~303-5650-1237 83,000 130,000 Traffic Total 697,840 Page 5 of 5