Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003/01/15 - Agenda Packet C'ITY, 0 F RANCHQ __GUCAMONGA, , . 10500 Civic ~n~e.r Drive Rancho CU¢~monga,~'CA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS CITY COUNCIL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETINGS: 1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. JANUARY 15, 2003 A~encv, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:00 p.m. Special Closed Session ...................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ......................Council Chambers City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A.~. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Gutierrez Howdyshell Kurth__., and Williams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation to Congressman Joe Baca in appreciation of his leadership and friendship to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as our Congressman in the United States House of Representatives. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Johnny Rojo, Manager of Home Town Buffet in Rancho Cucamonga, for continuous support of community services programs. 3. Presentation to the City Council and staff by Gwyn Frost on behalf of Head Start recognizing their support of the "Spark of Love and "Adopt- a-Family" volunteer programs during the holiday season. 4. Presentation to the Mayor and City Council of the first City "Bikeway and Trails" pocket folded maps. C...~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D.~. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: November 25, 2002 (Special Meeting) December 4, 2002 December 18, 2002 City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 2 2. Approval of Warrants, Register December 11, 2002, through January 7, 1 2003, and Payroll beginning December 6, 2002, through January 4, 2003, for the tota~ amount of $7,622,381.91. 3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 43 December 31,2002. 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the East Avenue Street Improvements from Banyan Street to north of 23rd 49 Street, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/1446176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 03-002 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 57 Fisher Drive Street Improvements from East Avenue to Mulberry Street, to be funded from previously deposited developer payment placed in Trust Acct. No. 18820002314. RESOLUTION NO. 03-003 58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval to accept a donation of two (2) electric carts from the GEMCar 64 Company. 7. Approval of a Free Angels-Quakes Youth Baseball Clinic at the Rancho 64-1 Epicenter Stadium on January 25, 2003. 8. Approval of an appropriation in the amount of $6,000 to Acct. No. 65 11763035650/1448176-0 from the Measure I Fund balance to purchase Right-of-Way from County of San Bernardino, pay for County Flood Control District inspection fees and reproduction costs related to the Milliken AvenueANilson Avenue Extension Project, to be funded from Acct. No. 11763035650/144/176-0. City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 3 9. Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Kimley-Horn and Associates for the 67 Design of Traffic Signal Interconnect System on Base Line Road from Benson Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue in an amount of $15,000, and approval of an appropriation of $15,000 to Acct. No. 1124-303-5650- 1248124-0 from the Transportation Fund balance. 10. Approval of a four (4) month Time Extension to Designate Cherry Lane ?0 as a Private Street, thereby exempting the abutting properties from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code. RESOLUTION NO. 03-004 72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) MONTHS TIME EXTENSION TO DESIGNATE CHERRY LANE A PRIVATE STREET, FOR COMPLIANCE OF THE CONDITIONS PER CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 02-215, DATED JULY 17, 2002 11. Approval of a request to summarily vacate excess street right-of-way along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of San Marino 82 Avenue and extending south of the cul-de-sac terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, V-189 - APN: 229-263-68 and 229-321-21. RESOLUTION NO. 03-005 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVE., SOUTH OF SAN MARINO AVE. AND EXTENDING SOUTH OF THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE 12. Approval of Environmenta~ Assessment and Tentative Tract 92 SUBTT15724 - KB Home -A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 lot for the development of 78 single-family detached condominiums and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077- 831-32. Related file: Development Review DRC2001-00381. City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 4 RESOLUTION NO. 03-006 187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15724, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 9.05 ACRES OF LAND INTO 1 LOT FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES, AND 1 LETTERED LOT FOR INGRESS/EGRESS, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKVVAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-831-32 13. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Development Review 92 DRC2001-00381 - KB Home - The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings on 9.05 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077- 831-32. Related file: Tentative Tract 15724 RESOLUTION NO. 03-007 193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00381, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15724, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WiTH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1077-831-32 14. Approval for authorization to allow Verizon Wireless to perform on-site 198 testing at the Epicenter for the purpose of reviewing the suitability of the property to install a wireless monoparm communication tower. City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 5 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and 206 Qrdering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District for DR 00-60, located on the east side of Amethyst Street between LaGrande Street and Lomita Drive, submitted by Northtown Housing Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 03-008 209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-60 RESOLUTION NO. 03-009 2'10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR DR 00-60 16. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 2'17 ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRCDR00-79, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, submitted by Burnett Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 03-010 220 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRCDR00-79 RESOLUTION NO. 03-011 22'1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DRCDRO0-79 City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 6 17. Approval to release Improvement Agreement and Improvement 929 Securities (future bus bay installation on 6th Street) for DR 00-31, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street, submitted by JPI Lifestyle Apartment Communities. RESOLUTION NO. 03-012 231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES (FUTURE BUS BAY INSTALLATION ON 6TM STREET) FOR DR 00-31 18. Approval to accept construction of the Church Street Right Turn Lane 232 from Haven Avenue to 500' west, Contract No. 02-024 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $50,042.52. RESOLUTION NO. 03-013 234 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CHURCH STREET RIGHT TURN LANE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO 500' WEST, CONTRACT NO. 02- 024, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 19. Approval to accept the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Crossing 235 Improvements at the BNSF and SCRRA Railroad Crossings, Contract No. 02-067, as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approval the final contract amount of $254,868.28. RESOLUTION NO. 03-014 237 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA AVENUE GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE BNSF AND SCRRA RAILROAD CROSSINGS, CONTRACT NO. 02- 067, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 7 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREET ORDINANCE NO. 695 (second reading) 238 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREET F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 240 A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts). ORDINANCE NO. 697 (first reading) 269 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS SUBAREA 4, AS LISTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.32, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 8 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY 272 PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION - A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to 1) realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street, and 2) change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low- Medium Residential for a 9-acre parcel, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related flies: Tentative Tract Maps SUB'I-I'15724 and SUBTT16157. ORDINANCE NO. 698 (first reading) 307 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002- 00533, A REQUEST TO REALIGN THE TRAIL TYPE D BETVVEEN MALAGA DRIVE AND WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR, TO A TRAIL TYPE E ALONG TERRA VISTA PARK~NAY AND CHURCH STREET; AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (E) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM) FOR A 9.05-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF G~ PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda January 15, 2003 9 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. REPORT ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY NOISE 310 2. CONSIDERATION OF BATTERY BACK-UP POWER AT CITY 312 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3. PRESENTATION AND REQUEST FOR SUPPORT FOR THE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND MEASURE ON THE MARCH 2003 BALLOT (Oral) 4. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) 5. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 314 UPDATE J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 9, 2003, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. November 25, 2002 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetinq A. CALLTO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, November 25, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Depadment; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF BUSINESS 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON APPOINTED TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL HOLD OFFICE ONLY UNTIL THE DATE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION WHICH SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE CALLED TO FILL THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THAT OFFICE James Markman, City Attorney, stated if this Ordinance is not adopted, state law provides that the Council has 30 days to do one of two things once a vacancy occurs. They can either appoint someone or call a special election within 30 days once that vacancy occurs. He stated this is an urgency ordinance because there will soon only be three Councilmembers to vote on matters. Councilmember Williams stated she is in favor of the urgency ordinance. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Jerald Van Westerlin inquired how the appointed person would be chosen. Would it be selected by the City Council or filled by the person with the next highest votes from the November 5 election. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there is no process or criteria defined by law how the three remaining Councilmembers would do this. Mr. Van Westerlin felt the people should have the opportunity to give input in the selection for the next six months and felt it should be the popular vote that has just taken place. Charlie Folinger stated if the Council doesn't select the two people with the next highest votes from the November 5 election, they can put their friends in office and felt this was unfair to the taxpayers. Mayor Alexander stated it was his impression that if someone is appointed now, they would not be able to run in the special June election. Councilmember Curatalo stated that was her impression also. James Markman, City Attorney, stated this is not what the Ordinance does. Councilmember Dutton stated the decision who to appoint would be done by Mayor Alexander and Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez. He stated the Council cannot lock someone out from running in the special election. City Council Special Meeting Minutes November 25, 2002 Page 2 Ron Stark, past President of the Chamber of Commerce and resident of the City, felt there should be a special election in June to fill the vacancies. He stated what he hears about this ordinance makes sense to him. He felt it would be ideal to select one or two people who can fill the vacancy for six months if they would also agree not to run in the special election in June. Jerald Van Westerlin asked more questions about the process. He felt the community should have the opportunity to give input as to who is selected to fill the vacancy. John Lyons felt there should be an appointment to fill the vacancies. He stated he will leave it up to the current Council. Carol Douglas felt it was good to have a special election to fill the two Council seats. She stated she is in favor of the Ordinance. Melanie Ingram stated she was here to ask the Council not to approve the Ordinance. She asked that the Council sit on this matter until the three new Council are sworn in. She felt the Council should not appoint anyone and that there should be a special election. Leslie Grimes stated she does not think there should be any appointments made. She felt if there is though, it should be left up to the three Councilmembers to be sworn in. She did not feel there should be an appointment and that there should be a special election. Mayor Alexander stated he thought if someone was appointed after this Ordinance is adopted that it would preclude them from running in a special election. Jim Frost sated there are several candidates who were not successful that he would support. He stated he agrees with the idea of a special election. He felt the Council to be sworn in on December 4 should make this decision. Councilmember Dutton stated he had received a call from Councilmember Elect Gutierrez and was told he is in favor of this Ordinance. There being no further comments, public input was closed. Councilmember Biane felt there is the possibility of matters being challenged through court if there are only three people sitting on the Council. He felt there should be five people for the next six month. He felt there should be a special election in June. Councilmember Curatalo stated she does not feel there was enough publicity for this. She felt Councilmember Elect Gutierrez should have a say in this decision, not her. She stated she would like to get more people's input and that this should be occurring at a televised meeting. Councilmember Dutton stated there are too many serious projects to come before the Council in the next six months to run on a three person Council. He felt there should be a full Council of five. He stated this Ordinance will also provide for a special election with two temporary people being appointed now. He felt the Ordinance would give people the best of both worlds. Councilmember Williams felt she would be more comfortable with there being more than three on the Council, that it would be a lot of pressure for three to carry alone. She felt it would be good to appoint someone who is not interested in running in June and appoint them for six months. She stated she is in favor of the Ordinance. Mayor Alexander questioned the Ordinance. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the Ordinance cannot preclude someone from running in June if they are appointed now. He stated the Council can ask someone not to run, but cannot make them. City Council Special Meeting Minutes November 25, 2002 Page 3 Councilmember Curatalo stated that was her understanding that if someone is appointed they could not run in the special election and she felt this was unfair. Mayor Alexander stated this Ordinance does provide that, but he did not feel he got the whole story on this. Councilmember Curatalo stated she felt anyone should be able to run in the race even if they get appointed for six months. Mayor Alexander stated he feels comfortable appointing the two people with the next highest votes from the November 5 election to fill the vacancies. Councilmember Biane felt by adopting this Ordinance people would have the best of both worlds. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 694. ORDINANCE NO. 694 (urgency ordinance) AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON APPOINTED TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL HOLD OFFICE ONLY UNTIL THE DATE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION WHICH SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE CALLED TO FILL THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THAT OFFICE MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Urgency Ordinance No. 694. Motion failed 3-2 (Alexander and Curatalo voted no) NOTE: 4/5 vote required to approve this. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * December 4, 2002 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetinq A. CALLTO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 4, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Grace Curatalo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Lynda Thompson, Assistant RDA Analyst; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; John Thomas, Acting Building Official; Alan Brock, Plan Check Managed. Building; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician; Captain Pete Odiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst I~; Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEMS OF BUSINESS WITH RETIRING COUNCIL B1. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION COMMENDING PAUL BIANE RESOLUTION NO. 02-303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING PAUL BIANE FOR HIS SERVICES AS A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 02-303. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. B2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION COMMENDING GRACE CURATALO RESOLUTION NO. 02-304 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING GRACE CURATALO FOR HER SERVICES AS A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 02-304. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. B3. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION COMMENDING BOB DU~I'ON City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 02-305 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING BOB DUTTQN FOR HIS SERVICES AS A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 02-305. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. B4. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION CERTIFYNG MUNICIPAL ELECTION RESULTS RESOLUTION NO. 02-306 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2002 DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW Motion: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 02-306. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. C. ITEMS OF BUSINESS WITH NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS C1. ADMINISTERING OATHS OF OFFICE BY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE JEFFREY KING TO WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER, DIANE WILLIAMS AND REX GUTIERREZ The oaths of office were administered by Superior Court Judge, Jeffrey King. D. PRESENTATIONS DI. PRESENTATION BY GWYN FROST Mrs. Frost was not present at this meeting. Her presentation was discussed at the regular City Council meeting. E. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. F. ADJOURNMENT The meeting recessed at 6:13 p.m., and would reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for the regular meeting after a reception was held to congratulate the successful candidates. City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 4, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and President William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Lynda Thompson, Assistant RDA Analyst; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; John Thomas, Acting Building Official; Alan Brock, Plan Check Manager/.Building; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation to Grace Curatalo in appreciation of her service to the City and the people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mayor Alexander presented Grace Curata]o with a City commemorative, framed print and a City tile thanking her for her service to the City and people of Rancho Cucamonga. Grace Curatalo stated it was a privilege to serve and commented how much she loves the City. B2. Presentation of Proclamations in recognition ofthe "Day of the Horse 2002." Proclamations were presented to representatives of Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy, Alta Loma Riding Club, Rancho Rebels 4-H Club Horse Project and the Rancho Cucamonga Citizen's Equestrian Patrol. They all thanked the City for their continued support. B3. Presentation to the City Council from the 4-H Club in recognition of the Council's support of 4-H Youth Programs. Carol Douglas from the 4-H Club presented the Council with the award. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 4 C1. Gwyn Frost spoke about the traditional coffee mugs she and her husband Jim present new members that are seated on the Council. She stated she had already given Rex Gutierrez a coffee mug the first time he was elected to the Council. She stated she will continue with this tradition when the two new members become part of the Council. She also thanked Grace Curatalo for her service to the community, and she also thanked Paul Biane and Bob Dutton. C2. Darlene Nichols of Rancho Cucamonga stated the City Council has been wonderful. She hoped there would not be an election and that the Council would appoint the two people who received the next highest votes in the November 5 election. C3. A lady (did not identify herself) stated she would like to see the Council appoint the two people who received the next highest votes in the November 5 election. C4. Alice Brown, 10448 Finch, stated she agreed with Mayor Alexander and felt that the top runner-ups should be placed in the two vacant seats. She felt the cost for a special election would be passed on to the residents. She asked the Council to do the right thing and appoint the two people who received the next highest votes in the November 5 election. C5. Gwyn Frost, Head Start, wanted to thank the City employees for the Thanksgiving food baskets they donated. She stated the employees are also helping out with Christmas baskets. C6. Doris Beckner stated she has been reading the newspaper about all of the problems that are going on with the City Council vacancy. She stated she has a petition with approximately 80 signatures against the special election. She stated they would like the Council to appoint the two people who received the next highest votes in the November 5 election. She asked the Council to consider this. C7. Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton St., stated he agreed with all the people that previously spoke and felt that David Grossberg and Grace Curatalo should be appointed to the City council. C8. A lady (did not identify herself) congratulated the Council on the way they have been running the City. She felt Grace Curatalo and David Grossberg should be appointed to fill the vacancy. She asked the City Council to consider that. C9. Suzanne Cable, Torrino Road, had a petition indicating people think there is too much noise from the new freeway. Mayor Alexander stated the City is aware of the problems with the noise and stated the City will do whatever it can to help with this situation. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the Engineering Division is also trying to help the residents with their complaints. He stated they will be taking sound readings to try to prove a point. Ms. Cable stated she also agreed that Grace Curatalo should be appointed to fill a vacant seat. C10. Charles Hurrell, 6259 Serena, also complained about the sound problem from the freeway indicating it was very loud. C11. A man (did not identify himself) commented on the great leadership of Mayor Alexander and felt the Council should appoint to fill the vacancies. City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 5 D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register 11/13/02 thru 11/25/02, and Payroll ending 11/17/02, for the total amount of $4,328,665.76. D2. Approval of the advertising for the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Phase lB of Community Facilities District 2001-01 to be funded from Acct. No. 16123035650/1442612-0. RESOLUTION NO. 02-307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR PHASE lB OF COMMUNITY FACILtTIES DISTRICT 2001-01, CONSISTING OF STREET, STORM DRAIN, SEWER, LANDSCAPING AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D3. Approval of a Request for Waiver of Epicenter Special Event Area Fees for the Local Chapter of the California Association of School Transportation Official's School Bus Roadeo to be held on March 15, 2003. D4. Approval of a Bill of Sale between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Verizon California, Inc., for the conveyance of the underground conduit and substructure facilities for Verizon as pad of the Lower Hermosa Avenue Phase II Improvements from 350 feet south of 8th Street to north of the Metrolink Railroad Tracks north of 8th St. RESOLUTION NO. 02-308 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A BILL OF SALE BETWEEN THE CITY AND VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF THE UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE FACILITIES FOR VERIZON AS PART OF THE LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS FROM 350 FEET SOUTH OF 8TM STREET TO NORTH OF THE METROLINK TRACKS NORTH OF 8TM STREET D5. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 02-309 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES D6. Approval for authorization to allow Cingular Wireless to perform on-site testing at the Rancho Cucamonga City Yard for the purpose of reviewing the suitability of the property to install a Wireless Monopalm Communications Tower. City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 6 DT. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 15914, generally located on Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue, north of Hillside Street, submitted by HER 22, LLC, and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City Council on January 3, 2001, from Cai West Enterprises. RESOLUTION NO. 02-310 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15914 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 3, 2001 D8. Approval and authorization for a Contract for Renovation of Two (2) Softball Fields at Red Hill Community Park, with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, (CO 02-137) in the amount of $21,744.00, funded from Acct. No. 1120-305-5650/1222120-0. D9. Approval of a Contract for Relocation Services for the Civic Center Rotunda Retrofit with Golden Eagle Moving Services, Inc. (CO 02-138), of Upland, in the amount of $2,471.00, funded from Acct. No. 1025-001-5300. D10. Approval of a Relinquishment Cooperative Agreement to accept control and maintenance over Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) from Grove Avenue to East Avenue, except that portion bounded by the southbound 1-15 on-ramp and the northbound 1-15 off-ramp, to be relinquished by the State of California to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Dll. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (CO 02-139) for the design and construction of improvements to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Mainline Drainage System. RESOLUTION NO. 02-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND EXECUTING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL D~STRICT FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE MAINLINE DRAINAGE SYSTEM D12. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Norris Repke, Inc., (CO 02-140), in the amount of $99,770 (plus 10% contingency) to provide professional design services for the proposed Carnelian Storm Drain Improvements from Vivero St. to 19th St. to be funded from Acct. No. 11123035650/ 1291112-0, and approve an appropriation of $109,747 to Account No. 11123035650/1291112-0 from the General City Drainage Fund Balance. D13. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Huls Environmental Management, LLC, (CO 02-141) in an amount not to exceed $44,000 to provide technical assistance in implementing a commercial waste diversion program, to be funded from Acct. No. 10013135300, and approval of an appropriation of $44,000.00 to Acct. No. 10013135300 from the Integrated Waste Management fund balance. D14. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and cancel the Improvement Agreement for DR 00-66, submitted by Pansiri and Surachai Wattanapom (PSW, Inc.) City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 02-312 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, THE RELEASE OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND THE RELEASE OF THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND FOR DR 00-66 D15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bonds for DR 99-15 and CUP 99-04, located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. D16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tracts 13812 and 14120-1, located on the south side of Summit Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Wealth V, LLC. D17. Approval to accept Landscape Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Landscape Improvements for Tract 15866, submitted by APHRC24, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive. RESOLUTION NO. 02-313 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15866 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE Staff report presented by Allen Brock, Plan Check ManagedBuilding. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 02-314 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S BUILDING REGULATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 693 ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 02-314. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 693. ORDINANCE NO. 693 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24, 15.28 AND 15.32, OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1 AND 2," 1997 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE," 2000 EDITION; THE 2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE," 2000 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2001 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE," 1999 EDITION, INCLUDING THE "UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PROVISIONS FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE," 1996 EDITION; ALL AS AMENDED BY THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION AND CONTAINED IN PARTS 2 THROUGH 5 OF TITLE 24 OF THE CODE OF REGULATIONS; THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS," 1997 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE," 1997 EDITION; TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS, ADDITIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS, INCLUDING FEES AND PENALTIES MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 693. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. F2. CONSIDERATION OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the federally required Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, which provides an overview of the laws, regulations, or other obstacles that may affect accessibility to housing. Staff report presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Councilmember Williams complimented staff on the thorough report. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired if this includes affordable housing also, and if the City is providing enough. Jessee Berkley, consultant, stated it was addressed in the recently adopted housing element, and this analysis is looking at individuals with similar income levels that have access to housing in the community. It's not necessarily looking for affordable housing, but it is looked at and examined. Coun¢ilmember Gutierrez stated it is mentioned in the report that it is considered an impediment in cities, ours not included at this time, that have building moratoriums on growth management plans. Jessee Berkley, consultant, stated the HUD considers that impediment, but that other counties do have growth moratoriums which can be an impediment to providing housing. City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 9 Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Frank Williams stated he is not against this. He commented on the fees invotved for building affordable housing units and the impediment that creates. He felt builders should let people know what the amount of fees are just to get something built. He hoped that the City will work with SANBAG on all of the fees. There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 02-315 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE, A REVIEW OF THE FEDERALLY REQUIRED ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE, WHICH PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE LAWS, REGULATIONS, OR OTHER OBSTACLES THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESSIBILITY TO HOUSING MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 02-315. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS HI. PRESENTATION ON THE CITY'S SILVER ANNIVERSARY HISTORICAL NARRATIVE AND SPECIAL EDITION OF THE GRAPEVINE (Oral) An oral report was presented by Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner and Karen Silhanek, Community Services Technician. They also gave a power point presentation. ACTION: Report received and filed. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) Councilmember Williams commented on the State budget situation. She also commented on the LOCAL (Leave our Community Assets Local) program and urged people to contact our legislators. 12. REPORT ON LOCAL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH Staff report was presented by Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 10 13. PRESENTATION REGARDING MOUNTAIN LIONS FROM A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (Oral) Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill, introduced Chief Tim Sawyer of the Department of Fish and Game. Chief Sawyer talked about the mountain lion incident that occurred in Rancho Cucamonga. He told about the attacks it made on animals and that it occurred at night. Councilmember Gutierrez asked him about the possible bear sited in the City. Chief Sawyer stated he is familiar with this and stated there is the possibility there are other bears. Mayor Alexander asked when these wild animals are captured why they can't be sent some place instead of putting them down. Chief Sawyer stated it is because there aren't enough places to put them all. 14. CONSIDERATION OF FILLING COUNCIL VACANCY (Oral) .Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there are two vacancies on the Council due to the resignations of Councilmembers Dutton and Biane. He stated under state law the Council has the option to appoint to fill the unexpired term or to hold a special election, a decision which the Council has 30 days to make. Councilmember Williams expressed in the past she was in favor of a special election. She stated she tried to get the urgency ordinance through at the November 25 meeting, which did not pass. She felt running on a 3 member Council until June could be very detrimental to the City and felt there was a need for a full Council because of so many things happening in the City. She now feels the Council should appoint two individuals to fill the remaining terms of Bob Dutton and Paul Biane. She felt it would be better for the City to appoint people that can hit the ground running. MOTION: Moved by Williams to appoint Robert Howdyshell and Dr. Donald Kurth to fill the unexpired terms of Paul Biane and Bob Dutton. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has listened to a lot of people and stated he likes the idea of appointing these two individuals. He stated both of these gentlemen on are on the eastern half of the City where most of the growth is now occurring. He felt they would be able to represent the residents on the eastern portion of the City. He stated for that reason, and many others, he supports that idea and seconds the motion. Mayor Alexander stated he respects the people that have been suggested, but that the community has never had the opportunity to see their names on the ballot for a City Council election. He stated as good as these two individuals are, he stated he still believes in the process of election. Motion carried 2-1 (Alexander voted no). J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. City Council Minutes December 4, 2002 Page 11 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Gary Kendrick welcomed Rex Gutierrez back to the City Council. He felt it was wrong to appoint two people that have not run in a previous election. He felt it was time to restructure the Council. He didn't agree with this decision and stated it will now create a vacancy on the CCWD Board by appointing Dr. Kurth. K2. Douglas Pure felt this was a travesty and did not agree with what the Council just did. K3. Melanie Ingram, Rosebud Street, felt this was an auspicious beginning for the Council. She stated she and a lot of people have done a lot of legal research putting together an Ordinance for the Council to consider for a special election in June. She stated she is very disappointed what the Council just did. Mayor Alexander asked how these two names came up and were suggested. Councilmember Williams stated she thought about this and talked to several people. She stated she felt these two individuals would help and be good for the City. K4. John Lyons felt this was a backroom deal. He felt the public should have been given the right to speak. He felt the whole City Council should give the public the right to speak. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was in favor of this decision because he felt it was for the good of the City. K5. Ron Stark stated the political process is what it is. He stated he is putting his faith in the two people that were voted in. K6. Mark Voss stated he read the newspaper article today about Rex Gutierrez and felt it was a felony. He felt an election should have taken place to fill the vacancy. KT. Jim Frost commented on what has historically happened in the City when there is a vacancy. He stated he respects the management of the Council. He felt people need to respect the outcome of this decision. K8. Leslie Grimes stated there is a process to vote people in and that the Council has denied them of this. She stated she does not like appointments. She felt if an appointment had to be made, it should have been the people with the next highest votes from the November 5 election. She felt the people of the City did not get the right to vote in this decision. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * December 18, 2002 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meeting A. CALLTO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 18, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander cailed the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/SpeciaI Districts Supervisor; Eric List, GIS Analyst; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Charles Scott, Sr. Information Systems Specialist; Sandy Ramirez, Management Analyst III; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Debra Meier, Contract Planner; John Thomas, Acting Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Odiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Depadment; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Fire Marshal Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation to Congressman Joe Saca in appreciation of his leadership and friendship to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as our Congressman in the United States House of Representatives. Congressman Baca could not be present tonight so this item was continued to January 15, 2003. B2. Presentation of awards to the winners of the GIS DaF 2002 Essay Writing Contest from the Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda School District. Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, and Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor, presented the certificates to the winners of the contest. Item E was heard at this time. The minutes will remain in the original order of the agenda. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 2 C. NEW BUSINESS C1. Reconsideration of all options for filling City Council vacancies specified in California Government Code Section 36512 with consideration of adopting motions, resolutions or an ordinance in order to implement the option which is chosen. (Requested by Mayor Pro Tern Williams.) Jack Lam, City Manager, asked the City Attorney to give a brief synopsis of this matter. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he does not believe there has been a Brown Act violation. He stated this is mute at this point since Councilmember Williams has asked that this item be reconsidered. He stated there are three major options for consideration tonight, but that the last action should be rescinded through a motion to do so. The options are: 1). fill one or two vacancies by a motion by appointing to fill the unexpired term for approximately two years, 2) call for a special election to occur in June to fill one or both of the vacant seats, and 3) he stated he does not agree with Melanie ~ngram that the Council can still consider an urgency ordinance to fill a term until June. He stated this is not an ordinance pertaining to an election, it is an ordinance affording the Council an alternative to fill vacancies for a shorter period of time and to call for a special election. He stated that Ordinance is before the Council. He added he is not sure the Council can do condemnation with only three Councilmembers. He reiterated that before a different action is taken from that of the December 4 meeting, the Council needs to rescind the prior appointments. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Maurene Sampson, 4965 Calico, stated she did vote for Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez. She stated she did not understand why people would want to put two losers on the Council. She did not think people should personally attack the Councilmembers. Malon Sampson, Calico Court, felt the urgency ordinance has merit. He stated he wonders why Mayor Alexander will now vote for this ordinance. He felt it was a bad move to appoint the two individuals at the last meeting and felt the Ordinance would eliminate special interests in the City. Melanie Ingram stated she does not care who is appointed any more. She stated what she is concerned about is her right to vote. She was disappointed that Mr. Neufeld was willing to give up his right to vote. She continued to comment on the three options. She stated she would support the ordinance proposed if it is legal to do that. She stated she was disappointed on December 4 and asked the Council to pass the ordinance tonight and did not feel money should be a factor. Mr. Neufeld stated his comments are not suggesting that anyone give up their r!ght to vote. John Lyons stated this is on the agenda because the First Amendment Coalition threatened they would take the City to court because of their previous actions. There being no further input, public comments were closed. Councilmember Williams stated the reason this was placed on the agenda is because the Mayor stated he would reconsider the ordinance. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to rescind the appointments made at the December 4 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page :~ Mayor Alexander stated he apologizes that he did not vote to have a special election. He stated his judgment was based on w~at he knows is facing the City in the future, to assist the seniors and the youth of the City. He felt his judgment was wrong and that he made an error and wanted to apologize for that. He stated he did not stop any election based on any recent or specific appointments. He stated he voted no on the ordinance, because in is naivety, he knew there would be a new Councilmember coming on and it was his objective to see that he had the opportunity to participate. He felt a special election was a good idea and wanted to apologize for the mistake he made. He stated he did not vote on anything for any personal interest. Councilmember Gutierrez stated after November he wanted to begin dealing with issues important to the City that need addressing, and that so far, they have not been able to do this. He stated the meeting he and Councilmember Williams had was about three hours long. He stated it was not a secret back room deal. He stated they talked about people to be appointed. He stated they talked about qualifications for appointing people. He stated they did not come out of the meeting with two specific names. He stated he did what he did to get this behind the City since the right for election, from what he understood, had been taken away. He talked about the hate mailers that were paid for by Frank Lizaraga, who is the attorney for Gino Filippi and the Curatalo's. He stated Mr. Lizaraga stated he would take care of his campaign debts if Grace Curatalo was appointed. He stated he does not care what happened in Don Kurth's background when he was 20 years old. He stated he did not feel Grace Curatalo had the objectivity when her son is in the fire department. He stated that special interest wants to gain control of the City. He stated he will not be intimidated by people, and if people want to recall him, that is their right. He stated he has talked to a lot of people that say they will stand by them. He stated it would not have hurt to hear more people at the last meeting, but felt the two people appointed are good people. Councilmember Williams stated she would like the urgency ordinance reconsidered because she felt it was the right thing to do. She stated a lot of what has been stated here tonight is what has been read in the newspaper, but that some things have been left out that could be important. She stated sometimes what is written in the newspaper is distorted. She continued to read her report that was included in the agenda packet. She stated she has not lied or misrepresented herself, that she tells the truth. ORDINANCE NO. 696 (Urgency) - NOT APPROVED AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON APPOINTED TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL HOLD OFFICE ONLY UNTIL THE DATE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION WHICH SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE CALLED TO FILL THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THAT OFFICE RESOLUTION NO. 02-329 - NOT VOTED ON A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 3R[~ DAY OF JUNE 2003, FOR THE ELECTION OF TWO MEMBERS OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH ANY AND ALL ELECTIONS TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE IN SAID TERRITORY City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 02-330 - NOT VOTED ON A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE FOR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATES STATEMENT FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 2003 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to adopt Ordinance No. 696. Motion failed 2-1 (Gutierrez voted no). The City Attorney pointed out the two options left to the Council. Mayor Alexander stated he does have one thing negative to say about the people being considered for appointment. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to appoint Mr. Robert Howdyshell and Dr. Donald Kurth to fill the two remaining seats with terms ending November 2004. Mayor Alexander felt this was going to be hard on the two people to be appointed knowing how the public feels. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is trying to do what is in the best interest of the City. Motion carried 2-1 (Alexander voted no). A recess was taken at 9:24 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:48 p.m. with all three members present. D. ITEMS OF BUSINESS WITH NEWLY-APPOINTED OFFICIALS D1. Administering Oaths of Office to Robert Howdyshell and Donald J. Kurth, M.D. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, conducted the swearing in of Robert Howdyshell and Donald J. Kurth, M.D. D2. Presentation by Gwyn and Jim Frost. The traditional mugs were presented by Gwyn and Jim Frost. Jim Frost talked about moving on and becoming a team. He asked that the Council do their own work and make their decisions in public. D3. Roll Call: Mayor Alexander called the Council to order with all five members present. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 5 E. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC El. A lady (did not identify herself) brought up the flooded street in the City. She stated Hellman and Arrow were the worst. She did not think the City should be naYve about the winter months. Mayor Alexander suggested updated road conditions could be given to the senior center staff so they can let the seniors know what is going on. The lady asked if the senior center could handle people during emergency situations. Mayor Alexander stated yes it could. E2. Richard McKee, President of the California First Amendment Coalition, asked the Council to rescind its decision made on December 4 because knowledge and input was not allowed to be given to the Council. He felt the decisions made should be rescinded. He added the Brown Act allows for the public to give input when the Council is making decisions. He encouraged the Council to do the right thing. E3. Peter Liu, 6458 Cambridge, referred to a petition he submitted from residents on the north side of Highland who wanted sound walls along the north side of the Route 30 freeway because of the noise. He added it is very disturbing to all of the people. He stated they would like for the Council to have SANBAG conduct a sound study and then do any window replacement afterwards where needed after the Council accepts their sound study. He stated with the street improvements being done on the south side of Highland between Archibald and Hermosa and they would like a chance for the residents to be involved by giving input for the design features. He asked that these improvements be submitted. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like for a repod to come back at the next meeting regarding the sound wall issue because of the information presented by Mr. Liu and other people. E4. Aubrey Campbell stated he was glad to see Jeff King swear in Mayor Alexander and Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez at the last meeting. He told about the good reputation of these three Councilmembers. E5. David Burchfield presented overheads regarding the sound problems due to the freeway. A copy is on file in the City Clerk's office. He asked the Council for help in getting these problems resolved. E6. John Lyons talked about the appointment that was made at the last meeting and how it came about. He felt Councilmember Williams was not living by her oath she took and felt she should resign. E7. Gwyn and Jim Frost talked about the first flood that occurred when the City incorporated. Mrs. Frost felt the City has come a long way since incorporation. Mr. Frost stated there is still a long way to go. He continued to talk about the days when the street flooding was so bad. He stated a lot has changed since then. E8. Steve Jennings, resident for twelve years, stated the actions of Councilr~embers Williams and Gutierrez taken at the last meeting are not the best for the City. He felt their commitment to the people will show by what they do tonight. He submitted a letter for the record. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 6 E9. Bob Neufeld of Etiwanda since 1971, stated he ran for Council in 1977 and lost. He stated he doesn't understand how people think losers should be appointed to the Council. He stated he applauded the Council for what they did, but questioned how it was done. He felt the people here tonight do not represent the majority of people in the City. He stated he will stand behind what the Council already did. He felt the Council should not change their decision already made and felt the cost for a special election was horrendous. He felt the Council should go forward with the appointments of Robert Howdyshell and Donald Kurth. El0. Steve Barden, 8926 Yew Street and a resident since 1974, stated he is disgusted and disappointed with the appointments of the two people to the City Council. He stated he does not know these two people, but there is arrogance in the way it was done. He felt Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez are not trustworthy. E11. Delora DeBarge stated she is disappointed that Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez appointed Robert Howdyshell and Donald Kurth. She stated she will never will, nor ever has, voted for Diane Williams. She stated she is not sure about Rex Gutierrez. E12. Will Wright, new to the City, stated he wanted to speak at the last meeting and was disappointed how the decision came down. He felt the people should be able to vote again to fill the vacancies. He was not in favor of a special election because of the cost, but did feel the people with the 3rd and 4th highest vote totals could be appointed. He stated he would like consistency in the City and would recommend that Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez resign. E13. Tom Lorenz, Sandelwood Court, stated what happens at this meeting will only partially fix what was done at the last meeting. He felt anything that Diane Williams wants to do will be questioned. E14. Shelly and Bill McKliman stated he would never vote for Councilmember Williams again because she has let his daughter, Shelly, down. He stated he does not like the looks of Councilmember Rex Gutierrez. He stated he does not want a recall, but that he does not like what is happening. He felt Councilmember Williams has broken the law and asked that she and Councilmember Gutierrez resign. He felt four other people should be appointed to serve with Mayor Alexander. E15. Leslie Grimes stated she could not believe what was written in the newspaper that Councilmembers Williams and Gutierrez had got together. She stated when they got together they knew they would be the majority of the Council at the December 4 meeting, and therefore, they broke the law because of the Brown Act. She felt a special election was needed even though it is costly. E16. Ron Stark stated he did lose in the last election, and added he is sorry that Mayor Alexander and Grace Curatalo voted against the Ordinance proposed on November 25. He commented that now Mayor Alexander will go along with it. He felt the losers of the November 5 election should lose graciously. He did not feel the two people with the next highest votes should be appointed. He stated he would support Councilmembers Gutierrez and Williams' decision. E17. Diane Ballet, 9531 Tryon, stated Councilmember Gutierrez told her that he met Councilmember Williams for the better of the people. She stated she is disgusted with Councilmember Williams and has never voted for her and never will in the future. She also stated she is sorry she voted for Councilmember Gutierrez. She felt both of them should resign. She felt Councilmember Williams lied about meeting with Councilmember Gutierrez. She felt it was discussed before hand and that they should resign. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page ? E18. Ken Douglas felt the Council would not let him speak or vote due to the cost. E19. Myer Oberlon, 6210 Morningside Place, felt the Council should help them with the freeway noise. He stated you cannot sleep with your windows open any longer. He asked for the Council's help. E20. David Mitchell, Rancho Cucamonga High School, stated he lives near the freeway and felt something should be done about the noise. Mayor Alexander stated there is a Route 30 Task Force meeting in March, and that the Council will bring this matter back at their January 15, 2003 meeting. Councilmember Williams wanted to make sure everyone that wants to speak on this subject get~ that opportunity before they move on in the agenda. James Markman stated that at the last meeting a lot of people did speak about this issue under "Communications from the Public"., He stated the Mayor did indicate that it was his intention to open this matter up for discussion again while the actual item was being discussed. He stated when they came to the agenda item, there was a motion cast and communications from the public or public input is required to be heard before the Council starts considering an item. He stated what the Brown Act says is that there will be an opportunity for the public to give input before the Council considers the item. He stated to avoid an instant replay of anything like what happened at the last meeting, even though we have already had "Communications from the Public", the intention of the Mayor before this goes to the Council and Council discussion starts, is to keep this open in case anyone else wants to say anything about this item. Mayor Alexander stated the intention is to give a staff report, allow public input, and at the time that opportunity is closed, the Council will discuss it and whatever happens will happen, but public comment will be closed. F. CONSENT CALENDAR Fl. Approval of Minutes: November 6, 2002 November 20, 2002 F2. Approval of Warrants, Register November 26 through December 10, 2002, and Payroll ending November 21,2002, for the total amount of $2,458,924.67 F3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2002. F4. Approval to amend a single source Professional Services Agreement (CO 01-099) between the City and Geographics in an amount not to exceed $30,000 (to be funded from the Non- departmental General Overhead City Account #1001001-5300) for professional communications assistance for the Spring and Summer 2003 editions of the Rancho Cucamonga Repo~fer, the City's quarterly newsletter, which is inserted in The Grapevine. F5. Approval to reject all bids received for the Foothill Boulevard Fiber Optic Conduit and Median Electrical System Project as non-responsive to the needs of the City. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 8 F6. Approval of Shirley Environmental Testing LLC, of south El Monte, as a single source vendor in an amount of $50,000 for upgrade of the oil storage tank at the City Corporation Yard and repairs to the fuel dispensing system to comply with State Code, to be funded from Acct. No. 10013175300, and approval of an appropriation of $50,000 to Acct. No. 10013175300 from the Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Fund balance. F7. Approval of a Summary Vacation (V-191) of vehicular access rights for two driveways at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue along Parcels 10 and 12 of Parcel Map 15295 (Parcel A of lot merger 495) requested by Catellus Development Corporation (APN: 229-011-82). Related File: DR 00-28. RESOLUTION NO. 02-316 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS FOR TWO DRIVEWAYS, ONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, ALONG PARCELS 10 AND 12 OF PARCEL MAP 15295 (V-191) - APN: 229-011-82 F8. Approval of Drainage Reimbursement (CO 02-042) in the amount of $277,000 for the Etiwanda Area 9 Master Plan for FY 2001/2002 to be funded from Fund 1126~303- 5650/1026126-0, and approval of an appropriation of $277,000 to Acct. 1126-303- 5650/1026126-0 from the Lower Etiwanda Drainage Fund Balance. F9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Development Review No. 00-28, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 02-317 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-28 Fl0. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement (CO 02-146) for undergrounding of overhead utilities for CUP 93-46, located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Art and Diana Flores. RESOLUTION NO. 02-318 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A UTILITY UNDERGROUND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY ART AND DIANA FLORES FOR CUP 93-46 Fll. Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract Map Nos. 16257 and 16347, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Empire Commercial Real Estate, LP. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 02-319 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NOS. 16257 AND 16347, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 02-320 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP NOS. 16257 AND 16347 F12. Request to enter into a Termination Agreement for a Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and AT&T Wireless Services (CO 02-147) for a Wireless Communication facility at Hermosa Park. F13. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement for Federal legislative Advocacy Services with David Turch and Associates (CO 02-148) in the amount of $48,000, funded from Acct. No. 10010015300. F14. Approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2002-000729 - ED ESTRELLA AND LINDA ESTRELLA (CO 02-149) - Request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Cherbak House and property, a Historic Landmark, located at 9938 Hillside - APN: 1074-211-32. F15. Approval to expend grant funding in the amount of $284,450 from the State Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant in accordance with the adopted budget for Fund 354 - COPS Program - State. F16. Approval for Annual Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Software Maintenance between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) in the amount of $22,257 to be funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, GIS Division 1001-207-5300. F17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 15912, submitted by Ryland Homes of California, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Base Line Road. RESOLUTION NO. 02-321 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15912 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 10 F18. Approval to accept the construction of the Local Street Rehabilitation-Slurry Seal of Various Streets, Contract No. 02-044 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $489,938.06. RESOLUTION NO. 02-322 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION-SLURRY SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 02-044 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK F19. Approval to accept the Arrow Route from Hellman Avenue to west of Archibald Avenue, and Hellman Avenue from Arrow Route to south of Foothill Boulevard Landscape Improvements, Contract No. 02-048 as complete, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $229,075.00. RESOLUTION NO. 02-323 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARROW ROUTE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND HELLMAN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 02-048 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK F20. Approval to accept the construction of the Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Overlay of Various Streets, Contract No. 02-071 as complete, approval to appropriate $23,800.00 to Acct. No. 11703035650/1022170-0 from Gas Tax 2105/Proposition 111 fund balance, retain the Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $431,350.91. RESOLUTION NO. 02-324 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABI.LITATION-OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS, CONTRACT NO. 02-071 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. With the exception of Gutierrez, Howdyshell and Kurth voting on the minutes of November 6 and November 20, 2002. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page ! ! G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Gl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16157 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the proposed subdivision of 60.17 acres of land into ten lots in the Medium (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and High (24-30 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, within the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the nodhwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 227-151-30. Related files: Development/Design Review DRC2001-00791 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC 2002-00533. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC 2001-00791 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - The appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the design review of 677 dwelling units on 39.6 acres of land in the Medium (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and High (24-30 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts within the Terra Vista Community Plan on Lots 1-9 of Tentative Tract Map Subtt161257, located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 227-151-30. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Staff report presented by Debra Meier, Contract Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Shawna Lee, Hardy Avenue, stated there are many citizens who do not want this project to be built. She felt the apartment owners will be the ones who will benefit from this. She felt there was a chance for the property values to decrease if this project moves forward. She stated she did not feel there would be enough money to pay for City services for this project because of all the state budget cuts. She expected the City Council to be their voice and stop this project. Lisa Wedelton, Hardy Avenue, felt the park near them would be impacted because of all of the families from the apartments that would be using this. She talked how this would impact schools because they are also so overcrowded. Houman Emami felt there was 1144 total units that the Council had not been told about. He talked about the noticing that the City did. He felt the project would really impact the surrounding area. Jacqueline Gasca stated she moved to Rancho Cucamonga because of all of the wonderful things she heard about the City. She stated she was not aware of the apartments that were going to be built at this location. She felt the apartments being built would make the property values decrease, and asked the Council to vote against the apartments. Lisa Foss, Barratt Drive, stated the signs posted say multi-family homes. She stated one of the names on one of the signs is Lewis Operating Corporation and the other one states Lewis Apartment Communities with one sign stating it is multi-family units and the other stating they will be apartments. She felt the schools would be overcrowded. She would like the Council to take a crime analysis and find out how it will impact the area. She felt the schools should be contacted to see if they will be impacted. She stated she would also like the sign language investigated. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 · Page 12 John Young, Lewis Operating Corporation, stated he would like to speak in favor of the project. He talked about the attractiveness of the project, the design, the amenities, and felt this is one of the best projects in Terra Vista. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the rental range. Mr. Young stated between $1000 and $2000 per month. Councilmember Gutierrez asked why they did not want single family units on this property. Mr. Young stated it has always been planned like this and that there is residential on the nodh and commercial on the south. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what the schools have said. Mr. Young felt there would only be about 200 kids from this apadment complex that would go to the schools. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about property values. Mr. Young stated he did not know of any studies indicating property values would go down. He stated their projects are highly amenitized and good quality units. And felt the people are high income people. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired about traffic. Mr. Young stated this would generate between 1300 and 1400 cars. Mayor Alexander inquired further about the amenities. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they are in excess of what is normally required for a project. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired about crime. Captain Ortiz, Police Department, stated he.does not know of any analysis where apartments can create more crime. He stated there will be more calls because of more people, but that they do have enough officers. Councilmember Kurth asked if the existing City streets will be able to handle the traffic generated from this complex. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated all of the streets are designed to handle the traffic as planned and then some. Patricia Carlson stated she was attracted to Terra Vista when she moved here because of the master plan. She felt the developer does work with the schools on being able to handle the students that would attend. She felt Lewis always takes care of their units they build. She stated she supports the project. Shawna Lee stated she called the state on the number of apartments that are required by be built and asked if the City would check into this to see what the correct number is. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the State has certified the number of housing units for the housing element of the City. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page t:~ Shawna Lee felt there would be cuts made because of the state's budget. There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Alexander felt people need to know that multi-family means apartments. He stated he did not think the Lewis' would be objectionable to hearing about safety issues. He felt the developer offers more amenities than most projects. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has concerns about the schools and traffic. He stated the Planning Commission does require a quality project. He felt there would come a time when there should not be as much development. He stated since this project has been on the "books" since 1983, he does not feel it is time to stop this project. He did not think home values would suffer in Terra Vista because of the apartments. Councilmember Kurth commended the appellant on the work they put into this. He stated he has met with Brad Buller, City Planner, on this project. He felt the Lewis' did an excellent job on this. He did not think there was an easy way to undo this commitment at this time. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed with what has been stated. She added she does not have a problem with them coming in and does not feel there is any deception intended with the signs. RESOLUTION NO. 02-325 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16157, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 10 LOTS, ON 60.17 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), MEDIUM-HIGH (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND HIGH (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKVVAY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-151-30 RESOLUTION NO. 02-326 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00791 FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 677 APARTMENTS ON 39.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), MEDIUM- HIGH (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND HIGH (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-151-30 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 02-325 and 02-326. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 14 H. PUBLIC HEARINGS H1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREET Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. He stated the information he distributed is to be included in the record. Deputy Harm, Police Department, narrated the video shown about this. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the City's current ordinance. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the reason for the ordinance is a public safety issue. Mayor Alexander stated the people looking for work need to have their rights protected as well as those affected by the people looking for work. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if this has been enforced. Deputy Harm stated they are enforcing this and that the workers are now currently going to the City of Upland. He stated they are looking for a long term solution. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Aubrey Campbell stated he is so proud of his City. He stated he does not feel comfortable letting his grandchildren out because he is afraid what will happen to them because of this situation. There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed. Debra ,J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 695. ORDINANCE NO. 695 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREET MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 695 for the January 15, 2005 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 15 I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I1. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX TO FINANCE THE PROVISION AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECURED BY THE SPECIAL TAX, AND APPROVAL OF A DEPOSIT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (CO 02-150) IN CONNECTION WITH FORMATION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01. Staff report presented by Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. RESOLUTION NO. 02-327 A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ESTABLISH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 AND APPROVING A DEPOSIT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 02-328 A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO INCUR BONDED INDE~BTEDNESS WITHIN EACH OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2 OF PROPOSED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 02-327 and 02- 328. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 12. ANNOUNCEMENT OF GRANT AWARD IN THE SUM OF $7,752,688 FROM THE CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE VICTORIA GARDENS BRANCH LIBRARY - ORAL REPORT Staff report presented by Deborah Clark, Library Director. ACTION: Report received and filed. J. COUNCIL BUSINESS J1. SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM (Oral) ITEM CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 5, 2003. City Council Minutes December 18, 2002 Page 16 J2. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to appoint Mayor Alexander to SANBAG, SCAG and Metrolink and to continue the other appointments until February 5, 2003. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. J3. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE ACTION: Report received and filed.. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Gutierrez would like to discuss the Route 30 Freeway noise and sound wall issue. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Leslie Grimes stated she is disappointed what she saw tonight. She felt this looked contrived again. She felt it was unfair to make the appointments for the two year term. K2. Primo Morales, 8210 Malvern, felt people should move on for the good of the City and accept the two appointees. He felt everyone should work together and get this City back where it belongs. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded byWilliams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY COUNCIL MEETING SIGN IN SHEET ~'"~ ~^~: /~./~- Write in your Name, Address, City/Zip & phone Number Name Address City/Zip Phone No. ? TH E CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCAHONG^ Memorandum / DATE: January 15, 2003 J TO: . Councilmember2~e~ G_~r~ez . FROM. ~East~;~e'puty City Manager SUBJECT:~ouhcil Meeting Date: January 15, 2003 I have had an opportunity to discuss with the City Attorney the January 14th memo from Tamara Layne providing a summary of warrants on which you should abstain. Under his advice, you need only abstain from voting on the following: COUNCIL MEETING: Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191669 12/11/2002 $200.00 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191899 12/18/2002 $130.00 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191670 12/11/2002 $3,022.00 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191671 12/11/2002 $4,522.00 Please let me know if you have any questions. Cc: Jack Lam, City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer Ann HaWorth, Accounting Services Supervisor Debbie Adams, City Clerk T H C I T Y 0 F I i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: January 14, 2003 TO: Debbie Adams, City Clerk CC: Jack Lam, City Manager Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ann Hawor[h, Accounting Services Supervisor FROM: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer ~ SUBJECT: Summary of Warrants Councilmember Gutierrez Should Abstain From Voting On - Council Meeting Date: January 15, 2003 Attached for your reference is a summary of warrants by entity that Councilmember Gutierrez should abstain from voting on for the January 15, 2003 Council meeting. These warrants are included in the Consent Calendar section of each entity's agenda. If you have any questions regarding the attached, please give me a call at extension 2430. Thank you. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY '15, 2002 VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT Arrowh~dd Credit Union 191762 12/18/2002 $2,522.69 Arr/oChead/Credit Union 191977 12/24/2002 $3,522.99 A'frowhead Credit Union 192173 12/31/2002 $1,446.41 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191669 12/11/2002 $200.00 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191899 12/18/2002 $130.00 Southern Cai Edi~ 191703 12/11/2002 $16,236.48 191926 12/18/2002 $20,427.86 Southern Cai/Edison Southern C/al'Edison 191927 12/18/2002 $95,226.16 Southern/Cai Edison 191931 12/18/2002 $8,299.19 Soutbe~rn Cai Edison 192115 12/24/2002 $18,665.48 ~od~hern Cai Edison 192116 12/24/2002 $20,000.00 uthern Cai Edison 192299 12/31/2002 $7,263.66 i:finance~accounts payable~council warrant list. xls CITY- 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNClLMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2002 VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT Arrowh~'ead Credit Union 192173 12/31/2002 $644.22 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191670 12/11/2002 $3,022.00 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 191671 12/11/2002 $4,522.00 i:~finance~accounts payablelcouncil warrant list. xls RDA- 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SUMMARY OF WARRANTS COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING ON COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2002 VENDOR CHECK # DATE AMOUNT Cr~it Union 191977 12/24/2002 $283.50 Arrowhead Southern Ca~'Edison 191703 12/11/2002 $16,236.48 Southern ,~al Edison 191931 12/18/2002 $8,299.19 Southern Cai Edison 192115 12/24/2002 $18,665.48 i:lfinance laccounts payable~council warrant list.xls FI RE- 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 26.68 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 31.60 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 201.59 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,232.94 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 554.80 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 15.80 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 95.88 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 63.20 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,400.30 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 491.62 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 687.17 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND RTIRE SERVICE 15.80 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 342.95 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 318.61 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 37.46 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 747.89 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 374.90 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,917.63 AP - 00191501 12/11/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 11.00 AP - 00191502 12/11/2002 ABBEY EVENT 2,350.04 AP- 00191503 12/11/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 3.23 AP- 00191503 12/11/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 167.29 AP - 00191503 12/11/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.54 AP- 00191504 12/11/2002 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00191505 12/11/2002 ADAMS, DAVID 70.00 AP - 00191506 12/11/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,280.00 AP - 00191507 12/11/2002 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 297.51 AP - 00191508 12/11/2002 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 196.05 AP - 00191508 12/11/2002 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO 31.78 AP - 00191509 12/11/2002 ALVA, DANISELA 200.00 AP - 00191510 12/11/2002 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00 AP- 00191511 12/11/2002 ARBOR NURSERY INC 210.11 AP- 00191512 12/11/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 544.60 AP- 00191513 12/11/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,794.97 AP - 00191514 12/11/2002 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,714.28 AP- 00191515 12/11/2002 ASSI SECURITY 135.00 AP - 00191516 12/11/2002 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00 AP - 00191516 12/11/2002 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,647.50 AP - 00191517 12/11/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,227.50 AP - 00191517 12/11/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 127.50 AP- 00191517 12/11/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,402.50 AP - 00191517 12/11/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,242.50 AP- 00191518 12/11/2002 AUTO RESTORATORS 172.50 AP - 00191519 12/11/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 85.42 AP - 00191519 12/11/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 292.81 AP - 00191520 12/11/2002 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,897.51 AP - 00191522 12/11/2002 BAUDVILLE 131.20 AP - 00191524 12/11/2002 BERNELL HYDRAULICS 1NC 196.94 AP - 00191525 12/11/2002 BORDNER, MARGIE 330.60 AP - 00191526 12/11/2002 BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES 1NC, MICHAEL 16,717.95 AP - 00191527 12/tl/2002 BROWN, JOHNNIE 200.00 AP - 00191528 12/11/2002 BRUCE, INGRID 318.78 AP - 00191530 12/11/2002 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 649.95 AP - 00191532 12/11/2002 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: I Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191533 12/11/2002 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL REVENUE & TAX ASS 25.00 AP- 00191534 12/11/2002 CALPELRA 230.00 AP - 00191534 12/11/2002 CALPELRA 230.00 AP ~ 00191535 12/11/2002 CALSENSE 350.00 AP- 00191535 12/11/2002 CALSENSE 337.63 AP- 00191535 12/11/2002 CALSENSE 527.20 AP- 00191535 12/11/2002 CALSENSE 4,726.22 AP- 00191535 12/11/2002 CALSENSE 478.71 AP - 00191536 12/11/2002 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 14.89 AP - 00191537 12/11/2002 CAMPBELL, KRISTEN 11.40 AP- 00191538 12/11/2002 CENTEX HOMES 4,300.00 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC -205.18 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 313.37 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 230.16 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 64.21 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 86.15 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 159.56 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC -51.81 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 126.67 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC 53.34 AP - 00191539 12/11/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC -86.15 AP- 00191540 12/11/2002 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00191541 12/11/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 37.26 AP - 00191542 12/11/2002 COMB[NED MARTIAL SCIENCE [NC 406.80 AP - 00191543 12/11/2002 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ! 85.01 AP - 00191544 12/11/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 30.00 AP- 00191545 12/11/2002 COX, KATHY 200.00 AP- 00191546 12/11/2002 CPRS 415.00 AP- 00191546 12/11/2002 CPRS 125.00 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 97.04 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 531.25 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 67.51 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 93.74 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 27.14 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 92.71 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 109.19 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.09 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 244.12 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 256.84 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 95.80 AP - 00191548. 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 208.07 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 266.78 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 804.14 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60 AP - 00191548 I2/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 148.69 AP - 00191548 12/11/200.2 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,034.03 AP- 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 143.54 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 290.83 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 225.94 AP - 00191548 12/I1/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 74.38 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 189.53 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.78 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 331.67 User: ahunsber - Aim Hunsberger Page: 2 Current Date: 01/08/.~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTKAITRC. CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191548 12/I 1/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 229.70 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 405.83 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.60 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 42.45 AP- 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 193.86 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 878.96 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 105.43 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 292.89 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 162.08 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 167.23 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 310.04 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 142.51 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 114.34 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 933.19 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 51.63 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 180.62 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 79.32 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 133.91 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 251.33 AP - 00191548 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 142.36 AP - 00191549 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 600.50 AP - 00191549 12/11/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 799.51 AP- 00191550 12/11/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 4,200.00 AP- 00191550 12/11/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES [NC 350.00 AP- 00191550 12/11/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES 1NC 700.00 AP - 00191551 12/11/2002 D 7 CONSULTING [NC 375.00 AP - 00191552 12/11/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 339.42 AP - 00191552 12/11/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 229.51 AP - 00191552 12/11/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 298.47 AP- 00191553 12/11/2002 DAWSON, MICHELE 53.87 AP - 00191553 12/11/2002 DAWSON, MICHELE 35.37 AP - 00191554 12/11/2002 DE LA MORA, MARIO 105.00 AP - 00191555 12/11/2002 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00191557 12/11/2002 DELOITTE AND TOUCHE 13,500.00 AP - 00191558 12/11/2002 DELTA DENTAL 30,865.50 AP - 00191559 12/ll/2002 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 174.19 AP - 00191560 12/11/2002 DIVERSIFIED REPAIR & CONSTRUCTION 9,115.00 AP - 00191560 12/11/2002 DIVERSIFIED REPAIR & CONSTRUCTION 3,000.00 AP - 00191562 12/11/2002 DUVALL, KAREN 62.00 AP - 00191563 12/11/2002 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS [NC 7,573.58 AP - 00191565 12/11/2002 EDWARDS, NORVELLA 3.00 AP - 00191565 12/11/2002 EDWARDS, NORVELLA 67.00 AP - 00191567 12/11/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 226.50 AP - 00191568 12/11/2002 EVANS, DIANE 24.00 AP - 00191569 12/11/2002 EWING IILPdGATION PRODUCTS 193.98 AP - 00191569 12/11/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 228.51 AP - 00191570 12/11/2002 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 28.01 AP - 00191571 12/11/2002 EZ RENTALS 651.25 AP - 00191571 12/11/2002 EZ RENTALS 1,376.47 AP - 00191572 12/11/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.07 AP - 00191572 12/11/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.53 AP- 00191573 12/11/2002 FELIX, ADRIAN 60.00 AP - 00191574 12/11/2002 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 1,209.60 AP - 00191575 12/11/2002 FIELDS, JUSTIN 70.00 User: ahunsber - Aim Hunsberger Page: 3 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CKAGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191576 12/11/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 510.00 AP 00191576 12/11/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 612.00 AP 00191576 12/11/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 588.80 AP 00191576 12/11/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00 AP 00191577 12/11/2002 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 210.44 AP 00191578 12/11/2002 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 349.82 AP 00191578 12/11/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 168.94 AP 00191578 12/11/2002 FORD OFUPLAND INC 168.94 AP 00191578 12/11/2002 FORD OFUPLAND [NC 195.51 AP 00191578 12/11/2002 FORD OFUPLAND 1NC 520.57 AP 00191578 12/11/2002 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 195.51 AP 00191579 12/11/2002 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 1,470.00 AP 00191580 12/11/2002 FULLMERCONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 AP 00191580 12/11/2002 FULLMERCONSTRUCTION 1,000.00 AP 00191582 12/11/2002 GOLDq';WEST SURPLUS 431.00 AP 00191583 12/11/2002 GRAINGER, WW 120.73 AP 00191583 12/11/2002 GRAINGER, WW 169.30 AP 00191583 12/11/2002 GILAINGER, WW 33.81 AP 00191584 12/11/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 235.10 AP- 00191585 12/11/2002 HEILIG, KELLY 244.80 AP - 00191587 12/11/2002 HIRSCH AND ASSOCIATES 4,600.00 AP - 00191588 12/11/2002 HOWARD, LA TASHA 14.70 AP - 00191588 12/11/2002 HOWARD, LA TASHA 18.30 AP- 00191590 12/11/2002 HURLEY, ROGER 250.00 AP - 00191591 12/11/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS ]NC 255.05 AP - 00191592 12/11/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 189.81 AP - 00191596 12/11/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 56.81 AP - 00191597 12/11/2002 [NTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 82.43 AP - 00191597 12/11/2002 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 82.43 AP - 00191597 12/11/2002 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 82.43 AP - 00191598 12/11/2002 INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS 52,970.85 AP - 00191599 12/11/2002 INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSOC 165.00 AP- 00191600 12/11/2002 IRILIAN, MOE 70.00 AP- 00191601 12/11/2002 ITE 82.50 AP - 00191602 12/11/2002 JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON [NC 29.27 AP- 00191603 12/11/2002 JERSEY BUS[NESS BANK 3.00 AP - 00191604 12/11/2002 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,250.00 AP- 00191606 12/11/2002 KELIIPIO, TONY 10.00 AP - 00191608 12/11/2002 K1NKOS COPIES 160.01 AP - 00191610 12/11/2002 KOTZIN AND ASSOCIATES, R 934.20 AP - 00191611 12/11/2002 LAMAR, T[NA 62.00 AP - 00191612 12/11/2002 LEFF, ROY A 105.00 AP - 00191614 12/11/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 14,842.94 AP - 00191614 12/11/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 16,723.05 AP - 00191615 12/11/2002 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 2,530.00 AP - 00191616 12/11/2002 LLOBRERA, ELENA 200.00 AP - 00191617 12/11/2002 LN CURTIS AND SONS 24,07t.35 AP - 00191619 12/11/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 346.93 AP- 00191621 12/11/2002 LPS TACTICAL 86.60 AP - 00191622 12/11/2002 MAHMOND, A. ALY 100.00 AP - 00191623 I2/11/2002 MAHMOND, MOHAMED 100.00 AP- 00191625 12/11/2002 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 218.40 AP - 00191626 12/11/2002 MART[NEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00191627 12/11/2002 MASSA, RICK 10.00 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 4 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191628 12/I 1/2002 MATT'S HARDWAR~E 30.11 Ap - 00191629 12/11/2002 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 289.00 AP - 00191630 12/11/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 69.95 AP - 00191630 12/11/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 65.97 AP - 00191630 12/11/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 98.95 AP- 00191630 12/11/2002 MIDWEST TAPE 90.96 AP - 00191631 12/11/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 43.63 AP - 00191632 12/11/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00 AP - 00191633 12/11/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 149.51 AP - 00191634 12/11/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP - 00191635 12/11/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 15,437.89 AP - 00191636 12/11/2002 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO 231.14 AP - 00191636 12/11/2002 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO 693.39 AP - 00191637 12/11/2002 NATIONS RENT 107.78 AP - 00191637 12/11/2002 NATIONS RENT 21.55 AP - 00191637 12/11/2002 NATIONS RENT 61.96 AP - 00191637 12/11/2002 NATIONS RENT 48.49 AP- 00191639 12/11/2002 NELSON, MARIAN 34.00 AP- 00191640 12/11/2002 NETIQ CORPORATION 630.00 AP - 00191641 12/11/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00191642 12/11/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 140.00 AP - 00191643 12/11/2002 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 100.00 AP - 00191644 12/11/2002 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV CORP. 4.49 AP- 00191645 12/11/2002 OEBEMEY, REGINA 10.00 AP- 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 49.59 AP- 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 19.38 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 52.38 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 92.82 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 54.50 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 8.87 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 46.16 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 23.47 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 46.93 AP- 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -79.16 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 158.80 AP- 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 21.49 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 1,055.12 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -22.70 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 174.95 AP - 00191646 12/11/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 19.38 AP- 00191647 12/11/2002 OFFICE MAX 38.75 AP- 00191648 12/11/2002 OTANEZ, CAROLA 62.00 AP - 00191649 12/11/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 27.28 AP - 00191650 12/11/2002 P AND F DISTRIBUTORS 1,568.00 AP 00191652 12/11/2002 PARSAC 37,815.50 AP 00191653 12/11/2002 PATEL, KUSSUM 10.00 AP 00191654 12/11/2002 PCMAGAZINE 39.97 AP 00191655 12/11/2002 PEPBOYS 34.71 AP 00191656 12/11/2002 PEPITO, ZORAIDA 200.00 AP 00191657 12/11/2002 PEREZ, HECTOR 35.00 AP 00191658 12/11/2002 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 1,120.02 AP - 00191658 12/11/2002 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 2,404.39 AP- 00191659 12/11/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 56,534.50 AP - 00191659 12/11/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 1,469.71 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsbcrger Page: 5 Current Date: 01/08/5 Report:CK_AGENDA KEG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register t2/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00191659 12/11/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 55,257.06 AP 00191660 12/11/2002 PITTENGER, CHRIST1NA 60.17 AP 00191661 12/11/2002 PMI 2,683.52 AP 00191662 12/11/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,454.36 AP 00191662 12/11/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 564.57 AP 00191662 12/11/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 883.04 AP 00191662 12/11/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 4,765.91 AP - 00191663 12/11/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 356.28 AP - 00191663 12/11/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 374.46 AP - 00191663 12/11/2002 POMONA VALLEY KA. WASAKI 534.70 AP- 00191664 12/11/2002 POUR_HASSANIAN, ABBY 120.00 AP - 00191665 12/11/2002 PRESENTATION SYSTEMS INC 360.00 AP - 00191666 12/11/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY " 7.00 AP - 00191666 12/11/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00191666 12/11/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00191667 12/11/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 17.24 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 993.55 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 43.41 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 29.00 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 43.41 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 765.07 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 304.92 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 46.34 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 297.73 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 72.50 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 575.26 AP - 00191668 12/11/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 106.96 AP 00191668 12/11/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 43.41 AP 00191668 12/11/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 31.92 AP 00191668 12/11/2002 RANDRAUTOMOTIVE 106.96 AP 00191669 12/11/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBEROF COMMEI 200.00 AP 00191672 12/11/2002 RBM LOCKAND KEY SERVICE 6.25 AP 00191673 12/11/2002 RCPFA 4,145.41 AP 00191674 12/11/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 141.58 AP 00191676 12/11/2002 RIVAS, RUBEN 140.00 AP 00191677 12/11/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 423.44 AP 00191677 12/11/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 8.08 AP 00191678 12/11/2002 RMAGROUP 2,035.00 AP 00191679 12/11/2002 ROD1N, DANIELLE 48.00 AP 00191680 12/11/2002 RUSSELL, CARLTON 62.00 AP 00191683 12/11/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 56.00 AP 00191684 12/11/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 5,985.00 AP 00191685 12/11/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 55.00 AP 00191686 12/11/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 792.54 AP 00191687 12/11/2002 SANCHEZ, ARICA 3.50 AP 00191688 12/11/2002 SANDOVAL & ATTY JIM WILLIAMS, DAVID 5,000.00 AP 00191689 12/11/2002 SCCCA 60.00 AP 00191690 12/11/2002 SCMAFINLAND VALLEYS 90.00 AP 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00' AP- 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00 AP - 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00 AP- 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 6 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 t~ough 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00 AP- 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00 AP - 00191691 12/11/2002 SCMAF 50.00 AP - 00191693 12/11/2002 SELECT PERSONNEL SERVICES 53.00 AP - 00191694 12/11/2002 SIR SPEEDY 21.55 AP - 00191696 12/11/2002 SLATTERY, DAN 62.00 AP - 00191697 12/11/2002 SMART AND FINAL 28.32 AP - 00191697 12/11/2002 SMART AND FINAL 302.14 AP - 00191697 12/11/2002 SMART AND FINAL 314.76 AP - 00191697 12/11/2002 SMART AND FINAL 189.89 AP - 00191697 12/11/2002 SMART AND FINAL 59.93 AP - 00191697 12/11/2002 SMART AND FINAL 22.91 AP - 00191698 12/11/2002 SMART MONEY 15.00 AP - 00191699 12/11/2002 SMITH, DAWN 62.00 AP - 00191700 12/11/2002 SNODGRASS, BRIDGET 200.00 AP - 00191701 12/11/2002 SO CALiF GAS COMPANY 2,582.39 AP - 00191701 12/11/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 307.62 AP - 00191701 12/11/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 268.57 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHER31 CALIFORNIA EDISON 348.78 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 251.32 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,385.92 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,252.68 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHEP,.N CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.61 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.34 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.79 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.80 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.64 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.06 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.42 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.92 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.43 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.75 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.02 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOPEqIA EDISON 103.75 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.75 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.80 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.49 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.59 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.01 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.55 AP- 00191703 I2/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.30 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.86 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.24 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.56 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 7 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CKAGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. ? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.83 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.99 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.74 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.47 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.13 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.48 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.80 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.77 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.59 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.93 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.66 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.92 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.80 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.21 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.67 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDI SON 12.53 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 196.32 AP- 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 294.82 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 236.32 AP - 00191703 12/11/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,599.21 AP - 00191704 12/11/2002 SPECIAL T FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,588.26 AP- 00191705 12/11/2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6,602.28 AP - 00191707 12/11/2002 TARAPOREWALLA, DIANA 10.00 AP- 00191708 12/11/2002 TARGET 9.63 AP- 00191710 12/11/2002 TERRY, DONNA 93.60 AP - 00191711 12/11/2002 TETRA TECH ASL i'NC 3,895.00 AP- 00191712 12/11/2002 TOBIN, ROBERT 5,784.50 AP- 00191712 12/11/2002 TOBIN, ROBERT 5,784.50 AP - 00191712 12/11/2002 TOBIN, ROBERT 48,200.00 AP - 00191713 12/11/2002 TOLL BROS INC 17,774.00 AP- 00191714 12/11/2002 TOMARK SPORTS i-NC 455.33 AP- 00191716 12/11/2002 TOWNSEND, MARGARET 10.00 AP- 00191716 12/11/2002 TOWNSEND, MARGARET 10.00 AP- 00191716 12/11/2002 TOWNSEND, MARGARET 62.00 AP - 00191717 12/11/2002 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 21.00 AP - 00191719 12/11/2002 TUASON, LOLITA 17.00 AP - 00191721 12/11/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 240.00 AP- 00191721 12/11/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 2,415.00 AP - 00191721 12/11/2002 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 240.00 AP - 00191723 12/11/2002 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 148,041.24 AP - 00191724 12/11/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 31.25 AP- 00191724 12/11/2002 UN1TED PARCEL SERVICE 34.18 AP - 00191725 12/11/2002 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 75.43 AP - 00191726 12/11/2002 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE 50.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 8 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTILAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A~enda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 27.12 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 28.66 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 98.05 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 179.97 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 28.67 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 29.12 AP- 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 28.66 AP 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 89.47 AP 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 61.41 AP 00191729 12/11/2002 VERIZON 478.44 AP 00191730 12/11/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00 AP 00191731 12/11/2002 VILLAGOMEZ, CHARLEI 30.66 AP 00191732 12/11/2002 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANANGER VPM 500.00 AP - 00191733 12/11/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 57.88 AP - 00191733 12/11/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 5.50 AP - 00191733 12/11/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 290.57 AP - 00191734 12/11/2002 WAXIE 3.89 AP- 00191734 12/11/2002 WAXIE 159.44 AP- 00191734 12/11/2002 WAXIE 417.24 AP- 00191734 12/11/2002 WAXIE 53.10 AP- 00191734 12/11/2002 WAXIE 418.20 AP - 00191735 12/11/2002 WILSON, MICHELLE 10.00 AP - 00191736 12/11/2002 WIMBERLY, RAVENEL 75.00 AP - 00191737 12/11/2002 WON, SON 34.00 AP - 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX COiKPORATION -14.00 AP- 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 1,282.23 AP- 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX CORPO1LATION 150.53 AP - 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX CORPORakTION 1,794.04 AP - 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 150.53 AP - 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 43.71 AP - 00191738 12/11/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 42.00 AP - 00191739 12/11/2002 YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, E L 1,332,371.16 AP - 00191740 12/11/2002 YEE, LARRY 105.00 AP - 00191741 12/11/2002 ZALDIVAR, MARY 39.00 AP - 00191742 12/11/2002 ZUBZIR, SELMA 10.00 AP- 00191743 12/11/2002 ZUDE, NATASHA 20.00 AP - 00191744 12/11/2002 ZWISSLER, JAMES 35.00 AP - 00191745 12/12/2002 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 23,000.00 AP - 00191746 12/12/2002 STATE OF CA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 20.00 AP - 00191746 12/12/2002 STATE OF CA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 64.00 AP - 00191747 12/17/2002 AZZARA'S GOURMET CATERING 305.53 AP - 00191748 12/18/2002 99 I KGGI BUSINESS DEPARTMENT 300.00 AP - 00191749 12/18/2002 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 342.86 AP - 00191750 12/18/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 81.50 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 9 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191750 12/18/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 43.63 AP- 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 80.81 AP- 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 142.12 AP- 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 249.77 AP 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 41.35 AP 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 155.50 AP 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 59.00 AP 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 59.00 AP 00191751 12/18/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 395.01 AP 00191752 12/18/2002 ABLAC 294.06 AP 00191754 12/18/2002 ACTGIS INC 8,812.50 AP 00191756 12/18/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,280.00 AP - 00191757 12/18/2002 AG ENGINEERING INC 788.94 AP- 00191758 12/18/2002 ALL WELDING 711A5 AP- 00191759 12/18/2002 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 3,700.00 AP - 00191760 12/18/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 3,520.00 AP - 00191760 12/18/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 1,080.00 AP - 00191761 12/18/2002 ARRAL INDUSTRIES INC 8,426.05 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 24.53 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 1,570.37 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 31.49 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 16.46 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 687.92 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 26.94 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 56.08 AP - 00191762 12/18/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 108.90 AP- 00191763 12/18/2002 ASPA 190.00 AP- 00191764 12/18/2002 ASSI SECURITY 135.00 AP- 00191765 12/18/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 16,798.00 AP- 00191765 12/18/2002 AUFBAU CORPORATION 20,572.00 AP - 00191766 12/18/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 60.39 AP - 00191766 12/18/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 249.36 AP - 00191766 12/18/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 44.47 AP - 00191766 12/18/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 90.51 AP - 00191767 12/18/2002 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 21.29 AP - 00191767 12/18/2002 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 25.58 AP - 00191768 12/18/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,110.00 AP - 00191768 12/18/2002 BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC 1,500.00 AP - 00191770 12/18/2002 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 196.94 AP - 00191770 12/18/2002 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 322.53 AP- 00191772 12/I8/2002 BISHOP COMPANY 148.70 AP- 00191772 12/18/2002 BISHOP COMPANY 2,545.20 AP- 00191773 12/18/2002 BOYLE ENGINEERING 14,484.17 AP- 00191773 12/18/2002 BOYLE ENGINEERING 8,773.71 AP-00191775 12/18/2002 CARR, JOANN 250.00 AP- 00191776 12/18/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72 AP- 00191777 12/18/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 167.66 AP - 00191778 12/18/2002 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 850.00 AP - 00191778 12/18/2002 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 850.00 AP - 00191778 12/18/2002 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 550.00 AP- 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERA~;TIVE LP 35.63 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERA~;TIVE LP 35.63 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERA~;TIVE LP 249.41 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 997.64 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 10 Current Date: 01/08/.~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR1NTERACTIVELP 142.51 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 37.43 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 224.59 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 C1NGULARINTERACTIVE LP 486.62 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 262.03 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 1,262.77 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR. INTERACTIVELP 1,104.92 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACT1VE LP 315.69 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 513.00 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 276.23 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR1NTERACTIVE LP 236.77 AP 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULARINTERACTIVE LP 39.46 AP- 00191779 12/18/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 39.46 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 157.86 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,197.83 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,048.10 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 299.46 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 37.43 AP- 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 149.73 AP- 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 285.04 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 463.19 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 213.78 AP - 00191779 12/18/2002 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,140.16 AP - 00191780 12/18/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 14,319.59 AP - 00191781 12/18/2002 CLAREMONT CAMERA AND VIDEO INC 271.50 AP- 00191782 12/18/2002 CLERK OF THE BOARD 35.00 AP-00191783 12/18/2002 CLOUT 40.00 AP- 00191783 12/18/2002 CLOUT 60.00 AP - 00191784 12/18/2002 CMRE FINANCIAL SERVICES INC 223.06 AP - 00191785 12/18/2002 COMMISSION FOR SOUTHGATE YOUTH 350.00 AP- 00191787 12/18/2002 COMSERCO INC. 488.65 AP- 00191788 12/18/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50 AP- 00191789 12/18/2002 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 20.00 AP - 00191791 12/18/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP- 00191792 12/18/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 130.15 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 64.08 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 131.85 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 242.06 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 175.11 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 126.36 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 112.28 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 443.27 AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 84.68 AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 147.66 AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 198.13 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 130.15 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 226.61 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 183.71 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 163.78 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 170.32 AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 148.84 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 148.84 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 59.75 User: ahunsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 11 Current Date: 01/08/;, Report:CK_AGENDA_ILEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 59.74 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 91.68 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 206.37 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 538.03 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 126.36 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 299.07 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.78 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 68.68 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 68.68 AP 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 128.76 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 154.51 AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 132.88 AP- 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 121.55 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 138.03 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 254.42 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 189.53 AP - 00191793 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 111.46 AP- 00191794 12/18/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,295.00 AP- 00191795 12/18/2002 D 3 EQUIPMENT 288.08 AP - 00191796 12/18/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 362.04 AP - 00191796 12/18/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 624.95 AP - 00191797 12/18/2002 DATA QUICK 91.17 AP- 00191798 12/18/2002 DAVIS & ASSOCIATES 15.00 AP - 00191799 12/18/2002 DIETER/CH POST COMPANY 272.03 AP - 00191799 12/18/2002 DIETER/CH POST COMPANY 175.69 AP- 00191800 12/18/2002 DIRECTV 27.99 AP - 00191801 12/18/2002 DIVERSIFIED REPAIR & CONSTRUCTION 12,014.00 AP- 00191802 12/18/2002 DUGAN, RANDALL 500.00 AP- 00191803 12/18/2002 EASTER, PAMELA 151.90 AP - 00191804 12/18/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 550.00 AP - 00191804 12/18/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 631.70 AP - 00191804 12/18/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 300.00 AP- 00191805 12/18/2002 ESCOTO, BRENDA 200.00 AP- 00191806 12/18/2002 ESR/INC 6,391.34 AP- 00191807 12/I8/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 56.55 AP- 00191807 12/18/2002 EW1NG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 407.05 AP- 00191807 12/18/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 118.12 AP - 00191807 12/18/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,360.12 AP - 00191807 12/18/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,200.00 AP - 00191809 12/18/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12.41 AP - 00191809 12/18/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.92 AP- 00191809 12/18/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.41 AP - 00191809 12/18/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.79 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 496.80 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 F1NESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 399.75 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 792.00 AP - 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00 AP - 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 594.00 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 546.90 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 340.20 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 710.97 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 560.63 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 588.80 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 588.80 User: ahunsber - Aim Himsberger Page: 12 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Port~'ait Layout Time: 16:3 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 453.60 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,440.00 AP - 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,080.00 AP - 00191~810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 351.00 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 444.15 AP- 00191810 12/18/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 628.94 AP- 00191813 12/18/2002 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 52.80 AP - 00191813 12/18/2002 FIRST PLACE qfROPHIES 120.68 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 148.83 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 429.60 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 429.97 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 103.84 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 195.94 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC -386.61 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 85.13 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 90.88 AP 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 73.64 AP- 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC -126.85 AP- 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC -1,546.43 AP- 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 139.16 AP- 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 401.10 AP - 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC -17.26 AP - 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 96.45 AP - 00191814 12/18/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 485.52 AP- 00191815 12/18/2002 FLUORESCO LIGHTING 1,559.50 AP- 00191816 12/18/2002 FRANCO, RONALD 73.00 AP- 00191817 12/18/2002 GEIGER, VERNON 100.00 AP- 00191818 12/18/2002 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,127.06 AP- 00191820 12/18/2002 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 192.50 AP- 00191821 12/18/2002 GRAINGER, WW 385.87 AP- 00191821 12/18/2002 GRAINGER, WW 184.47 AP - 00191821 12/18/2002 GRAINGER, WW 110.72 AP - 00191822 12/18/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 92.89 AP - 00191822 12/18/2002 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 89.49 AP - 00191823 12/18/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 103.31 AP - 00191823 12/18/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 54.95 AP- 00191824 12/18/2002 HAMBELTON, JIMME 73.00 AP- 00191825 12/18/2002 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP - 00191826 12/18/2002 HI LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 613.52 AP- 00191827 12/18/2002 HOCKWALD, CLARK 130.00 AP- 00191828 12/18/2002 HOLIDAY PRINTING 18,458.74 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 1,515.50 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 235.98 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.42 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 46.64 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 31.25 AP - 00191.829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 999.39 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 166.76 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 45.00 AP- 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 195.61 AP - 00191829 12/18/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO 1NC 46.34 AP - 00191830 12/18/2002 HOPPERS DRAFTING FURNITURE AND EQUIP 2,970.94 AP- 00191831 12/18/2002 HOSE MAN INC 112.67 AP- 00191831 12/18/2002 HOSE MAN INC 120.77 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 13 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191831 12/18/2002 HOSE MAN 1NC 224.26 AP- 00191832 12/18/2002 HUANG, PRUDENCE 1,950.00 AP- 00191833 12/18/2002 HUDDLESTON, PRISCILLA 210.00 AP- 00191834 12/18/2002 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP - 00191835 12/18/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 720.44 AP- 00191835 12/18/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS 1NC 156.83 AP - 00191836 12/18/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 54.79 AP - 00191836 12/18/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS ' 354.75 AP - 00191836 12/18/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 23.54 AP - 00191836 12/18/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 89.15 AP - 00191836 12/18/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 328.08 AP- 00191837 12/18/2002 ID BURR 16.10 AP- 00191837 12/18/2002 ID BURR 170.28 AP- 00191837 12/18/2002 ID BURR 55.49 AP- 00191837 12/18/2002 ID BURR 355.00 AP- 00191838 12/18/2002 IEMA 63.00 AP - 00191840 12/18/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 104.21 AP - 00191843 12/18/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00191843 12/18/2002 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00191843 12/18/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP- 00191843 12/18/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00191843 12/18/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 77.40 AP - 00191844 12/18/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 140.07 AP - 00191844 12/18/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 35.01 AP - 00191846 12/18/2002 1NTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 60.00 AP - 00191847 12/18/2002 ISLANDS RANCHO CUCAMONGA 45.00 AP - 00191848 12/18/2002 JUMA, HASSAN D 73.00 AP - 00191849 12/18/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS ][NC 103.60 AP - 00191849 12/18/2002 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS INC 974.15 AP- 00191850 12/18/2002 KECHOUR, DAVE 34.00 AP- 00191851 12/18/2002 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 824.40 AP- 00191852 12/18/2002 KRAFT, RUSSELL 62.00 AP - 00191853 12/18/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 497.23 AP - 00191853 12/18/2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 78.22 AP- 00191854 12/18/2002 LEON, LUIS 130.00 AP - 00191857 12/18/2002 LOS ANGELES TIMES 38.80 AP- 00191858 12/18/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP- 00191859 12/18/2002 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 831.61 AP- 00191859 12/18/2002 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 228.97 AP- 00191859 12/I8/2002 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 228.97 AP - 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,787.96 AP - 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,885.11 AP - 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 4,598.59 AP - 00191860 12/18/2002 MAR1POSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,103.97 AP - 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,335.00 AP - 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,357.56 AP ~ 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,796.66 AP- 00191860 12/18/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTUR3.L ENT INC 119.92 AP - 00191860 12/t8/2002 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 17,718.02 AP- 00191861 12/18/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 381.45 AP- 00191861 12/18/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 620.00 AP- 00191861 12/I8/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 567.37 AP- 00191861 12/18/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 77.00 AP- 00191861 12/18/20'02 MARSHALL PLUMBING 53.00 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 14 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. Iq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191861 12/18/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 105.00 AP - 00191861 12/18/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 246.00 AP- 00191861 12/18/2002 MARSHALL PLUMBING 245.00 AP - 00191862 12/18/2002 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 81.17 AP- 00191863 12/18/2002 MDS CONSULTING 9,215.00 AP- 00191863 12/18/2002 MDS CONSULTING 4,684.00 AP - 00191863 12/18/2002 MDS CONSULTING 11,837.50 AP- 00191863 12/18/2002 MDS CONSULTING 3,000.00 AP- 00191863 12/18/2002 MDS CONSULTING 9,315.00 AP- 00191863 12/18/2002 MDS CONSULTING 19,137.50 AP- 00191864 12/18/2002 MELLEM, SANDRA 37.00 AP-00191865 12/18/2002 MMASC 50.00 AP - 00191866 12/18/2002 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 726.00 AP- 00191867 12/18/2002 MR TS 24HR TOWING 65.00 AP- 00191867 12/18/2002 MR TS 24HR TOWING 127.50 AP- 00191868 12/18/2002 MUNSON, MICHELLE 36.00 AP- 00191869 12/18/2002 MYERS, JEFF 80.58 AP - 00191870 12/18/2002 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 13.85 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 121.54 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 29.74 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 114.78 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 135.55 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 80.78 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -42.10 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS -9.85 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.75 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 64.59 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 82.84 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 43.82 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2.07 AP- 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.99 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 50.01 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.20 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.20 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 8.85 AP - 00191871 12/I8/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 24.20 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 182.88 AP - 00191871 12/18/2002 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.54 AP - 00191872 12/18/2002 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 128.45 AP- 00191873 12/18/2002 NATIONALDEFERR~D 24,871.08 AP- 00191874 12/18/2002 NATIONS RENT 218.24 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 93.48 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 93.48 AP- 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 93.48 AP - 00191875 12/18/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP- 00191876 12/18/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 70.00 AP- 00191877 12/18/2002 OATES, STEVE 54.00 AP- 00191878 12/I8/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 991.73 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 7.50 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 9.70 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 15 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 42.03 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 14.96 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 43.63 AP - 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 25.16 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 2.03 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 29.88 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 387.90 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 79.40 AP - 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 51.13 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -0.76 AP - 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 11.37 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 45.43 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 22.46 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 60.86 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 36.17 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -9.70 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 78.45 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT -7.50 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 185.71 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 155.20 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 95.34 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 15.13 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 39.04 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 259.63 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 369.15 AP- 00191878 12/18/2002 OFFICE DEPOT 999.42 AP - 00191879 12/18/2002 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35 AP - 00191880 12/18/2002 OPEN APPS 720.00 AP- 00191881 12/18/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 149.02 AP- 00191881 12/18/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 149.02 AP - 00191882 12/18/2002 PAPA 110.00 AP - 00191883 12/18/2002 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 645.95 AP - 00191884 12/18/2002 PARSONS BRINKERI-IOFF QUADE AND DOUGL/ 2,544.24 AP- 00191885 12/18/2002 PATTON SALES CO1LP 27.34 AP - 00191886 12/18/2002 PEP,.FORMANCE AUTO BODY 731.69 AP- 00191886 12/18/2002 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 3,764.27 AP- 00191886 12/18/2002 PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY 1,012.22 AP- 00191887 12/18/2002 PETES ROAD SERVICE 1NC 12.00 AP - 00191889 12/18/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 1,148.83 AP - 00191889 12/18/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 499.60 AP - 00191889 12/18/2002 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 1,123.18 AP- 00191890 12/18/2002 PORTOSAN 6.29 AP- 00191891 12/18/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 210.00 AP - 00191892 12/18/2002 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION 1NC 135.55 AP - 00191892 12/18/2002 PRAXA1R DISTRIBUTION INC 135.55 AP - 00191892 12/I8/2002 PKAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 131.50 AP- 00191893 12/18/2002 PRIMA 310.00 AP- 00191894 12/18/2002 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP- 00191895 12/18/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00191896 12/18/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 124.31 AP - 00191896 12/18/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 121.53 AP - 00191897 12/18/2002 R C LAND CO 41,800.00 AP - 00191899 12/18/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 40.00 AP - 00191899 12/18/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEI 30.00 User: ahunsber- Arm Hunsberger Page: 16 Current Date: 01/08/~, Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191899 12/18/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME] 60.00 AP - 00191900 12/18/2002 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 11,000.00 AP- 00191901 12/18/2002 RAULS AUTO TRIM 1NC 338.88 AP - 00191903 12/18/2002 P. ED WING SHOE STORE 300.00 AP- 00191904 12/18/2002 RED1NGER, TOM 105.00 AP- 00191905 12/18/2002 RE1NHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP - 00191906 12/18/2002 KEXEL CALC(~N ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 215.50 AP- 00191907 12/18/2002 RH TECHNOLOGY 768.00 AP- 00191907 12/18/2002 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00 AP- 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 208.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 450.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 211.03 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,043.44 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,176.42 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,007.50 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 101.50 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 9,425.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 46.50 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,302.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 51.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 566.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 46.50 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,672.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 6,954.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 7,134.50 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,207.60 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,185.80 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 31.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 276.00 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 573.50 AP - 00191908 12/18/2002 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 37.44 AP- 00191909 12/18/2002 RIVAS, MIGUEL 73.00 AP - 00191910 12/18/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 51.72 AP- 00191910 12/18/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 102.41 AP - 00191911 12/18/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00191913 12/18/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 185.00 AP - 00191913 12/18/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 92.00 AP - 00191913 12/18/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 52.50 AP - 00191913 12/18/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 55.00 AP - 00191914 12/18/2002 S AND S WORLDWIDE 2.99 AP - 00191915 12/18/2002 S C A C E O 65.00 AP - 00191916 12/18/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 56.14 AP - 00191917 12/18/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 25.00 AP - 00191917 12/18/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 220.00 AP - 00191918 12/18/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN~ 289.68 AP - 00191920 12/18/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 35.00 AP - 00191921 12/18/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 124.99 AP- 00191922 12/18/2002 SCHAFFER, CARL 250.00 AP - 00191923 12/18/2002 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 52.56 AP- 00191924 12/18/2002 SILVER, EDNA 210.00 AP - 00191925 12/18/2002 SMART AND FINAL -123.39 AP- 00191925 12/18/2002 SMART AND FINAL 127.41 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 67.96 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 28.87 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 17 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3, /7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 49.55 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,956.09 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 533.84 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,826.63 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 56.92 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 61.84 AP- 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 6,236.22 AP- 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 7,493.89 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 54.30 AP - 00191926 12/18/2002 SO CALIE EDISON CO 61.75 AP - 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 38,647.48 AP - 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,727.75 AP - 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 4,212.90 AP - 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 14,992.80 AP - 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CAL1F EDISON CO 19,429.89 AP- 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CAL1F EDISON CO 12,120.96 AP- 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 2,868.67 AP - 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 181.47 AP- 00191927 12/18/2002 SO CALIF EDISON CO 44.24 AP- 00191928 12/18/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 176.04 AP- 00191928 12/18/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 334.20 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 219.33 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.81 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.20 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.43 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 178.46 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.99 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.41 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 170.48 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.52 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.14 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.64 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.12 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.:42 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.02 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.77 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.96 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.36 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.46 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 173.86 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.67 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8.08 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 185.78 AP 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.77 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 427.11 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.17 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.95 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 18 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 OOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.29 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.80 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.24 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.51 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.07 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.53 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.62 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.18 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.83 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.85 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.51 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.33 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.52 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.13 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.89 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.20 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.74 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 660.97 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.18 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,137.35 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.80 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.08 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.57 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.32 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.07 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.22 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.02 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.89 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.07 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.82 AP - 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.51 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.07 AP- 00191931 12/18/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP ~ 00191932 12/18/2002 STATE NET 275.00 User: ahunsber ~ Ann Hunsberger Page: 19 Current Date: 01/08/7, Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191933 12/18/2002 STEPdCYCLE INC 4,774.29 AP- 00191934 12/18/2002 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 359.59 AP- 00191935 12/18/2002 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 70.68 AP- 00191935 12/18/2002 STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT 286.99 AP- 00191936 12/18/2002 STETKEVICH, OREST 60.00 AP - 00191937 12/18/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 8,145.13 AP - 00191937 12/18/2002 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 3,305.85 AP- 00191938 12/18/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 67.00 AP- 00191939 12/18/2002 TIME WARNER TELECOM 1,250.00 AP- 00191941 12/18/2002 TOMARK SPORTS ]NC 59.22 AP- 00191942 12/18/2002 TRIVINO, GUILLERMO M 54.00 AP - 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,757.89 AP - 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 8,050.00 AP 00191943 12/t8/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,645.88 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 458.10 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 12,421.74 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCAKE REGIONAL 47.93 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 55,737.87 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANE)CARE REGIONAL 14,601.98 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 20,653.20 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 14,261.29 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCAILE REGIONAL 474.66 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 1,140.65 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 14,299.00 AP 00191943 12/18/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 2,967.16 AP 00191944 12/18/2002 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 12,000.00 AP 00191945 12/18/2002 UTI 184.77 AP 00191945 12/18/2002 UTI 136.00 AP 00191945 12/18/2002 UTI 306.31 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 121.00 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 617.08 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 121.00 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 72.81 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 574.41 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 190.73 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.34 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 66.90 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 34.34 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 90.64 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 601.07 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.34 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 561.35 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 66.90 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRSTUNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIF1RST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.34 AP 00191946 12/18/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00191947 12/18/2002 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 20,192.31 AP- 00191948 12/18/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 29.33 User: ahunsber - Ann Hnnsberger Page: 20 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA KEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191948 12/18/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 34.72 AP - 00191948 12/18/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 20.58 AP- 00191949 12/18/2002 UNITED WAY 623.32 AP-00191950 12/18/2002 URISA 132.00 AP - 00191951 12/18/2002 VAN DAELE COMMUNITIES LLC 8,755.00 AP- 00191952 12/18/2002 VAN TECH 665.85 AP- 00191953 12/18/2002 VERIZON WIRELESS 542.02 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 32.39 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VE1LIZON 22.64 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 27.10 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 31.33 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 34.05 AP - 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 31.32 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 28.67 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 32.39 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 37.38 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 54.17 AP-00191954 12/18/2002 VERIZON 278.96 AP-00191955 12/18/2002 VERIZON 1,650.00 AP- 00191956 12/18/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 600.00 AP- 00191957 12/18/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP - 00191959 12/18/2002 WASTE MANAGEMENT L.A. METRO 206.38 AP- 00191960 12/1872002 WATSON PAINTING 5,675.02 AP-00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 104.97 AP - 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 833.10 AP-00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 36.98 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 487.77 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 1,064.07 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 363.21 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 56.00 AP - 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 489.31 AP - 00191961 12/18/2002 WA×IE 9.19 AP-00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 96.10 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 1.17 AP-00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 214.25 AP-00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 139.88 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 139.88 AP - 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 211.99 AP- 00191961 12/18/2002 WAXIE 101.61 AP - 00191962 12/18/2002 WAYNE CORPORATION, LEE 680.74 AP - 00191962 12/18/2002 WAYNE CORPORATION, LEE 574.45 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 91.96 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 294.03 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 311.19 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 339.24 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 282.15 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 336.60 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 360.36 User: ahunsber - A~n Hunsberger Page: 21 Current Date: 01/08/3 Report:CK AGENDA_ILEG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 thzough 1/7/2003 Check No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 278.85 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MP.F LLC 284.79 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 349.47 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 302.61 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 292.38 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 49.17 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 231.00 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 334.62 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 256.41 AP 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 248.49 AP 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 211.86 AP 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEYMRF LLC 119.79 AP 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEYMRF LLC 46.86 AP 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 335.94 AP 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 469.26 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 167.31 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 135.30 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 245.19 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MILF LLC 172.92 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 188.10 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 133.98 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 151.80 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 84.48 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 143.88 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 117.48 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 70.84 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 206.25 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 183.48 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 189.09 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 132.00 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 455.07 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 329.67 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 249.15 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 220.44 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 245.19 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 246.51 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 187.77 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 186.12 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 272.25 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 209.88 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 202.29 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 315.48 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 255.42 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MILl: LLC 156.42 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 167.97 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 243.54 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 194.04 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 13.20 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 276.87 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 520.41 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 147.5 l AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 80.85 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 91.52 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 81.40 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 22 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 33.00 AP- 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 77.88 AP - 00191964 12/18/2002 WEST VALLEY MRF LLC 30.58 AP- 00191965 12/18/2002 WHITE, LARRY 170.00 AP- 00191965 12/18/2002 WHITE, LARRY 35.00 AP- 00191966 12/18/2002 WITTER, JOANNE 280.00 AP- 00191966 12/18/2002 WITTER, JOANNE 240.00 AP- 00191967 12/18/2002 WOOD, SUE 250.00 AP-00191968 12/18/2002 WORLDCOM 712.57 AP- 00191969 12/18/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 72.89 AP- 00191970 12/18/2002 YEE, LARRY 94.00 AP- 00191971 12/18/2002 ZWISSLER, JAMES 70.00 AP - 00191972 12/19/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN~ 220.00 AP- 00191973 12/19/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 25.00 AP- 00191974 12/24/2002 3M COMPANY 107.36 AP- 00191974 12/24/2002 3M COMPANY 727.32 AP-00191975 12/24/2002 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00191976 12/24/2002 AMERICAN PLUMBING PARTSMASTER INC 435.22 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CP,.EDIT UNION 217.80 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 761.68 AP- 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 39.64 AP- 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 70.12 AP- 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 47.80 AP- 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 67.13 AP- 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 208.50 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 45.85 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 52.51 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 16.55 AP- 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 126.55 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 243.46 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 62.56 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 325.72 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 148.60 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 31.75 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 590.79 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 34.47 AP - 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 81.20 AP 00191977 12/24/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 66.81 AP 00191978 12/24/2002 BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO INC, MIKE 47,000.00 AP 00191980 12/24/2002 CALPERS LONG TERM CARE 259.38 AP 00191981 12/24/2002 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS [NC 400.00 AP 00191982 12/24/2002 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' 65,288.05 AP 00191983 12/24/2002 CAMARENA, TAMI 34.00 AP 00191984 12/24/2002 CARTER, HENRiETTA 62.00 AP 00191985 12/24/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 199.00 AP 00191985 12/24/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 660.00 AP 00191985 12/24/2002 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 335.00 AP 00191986 12/24/2002 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRiCT 4,557.05 AP 00191987 12/24/2002 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 10.77 AP 00191988 t2/24/2002 CHAVEZ, MARIA 179.30 AP 00191989 12/24/2002 CHEVRON USA INC 139.38 AP- 00191990 12/24/2002 CITY RENTALS 276.00 AP- 00191991 12/24/2002 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 7,920.00 AP- 00191992 12/24/2002 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 23 Current Date: 01/08/5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00191993 12/24/2002 COAST RECREATION1NC 495.08 AP 00191993 12/24/2002 COAST RECREATION INC 600.00 AP 00191994 12/24/2002 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC 15,773.00 AP 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 39.13 AP 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTONTRUCK SUPPLY 96.27 AP 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 14.42 AP 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 35.17 AP - 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 22.65 AP - 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 14.42 AP - 00191995 12/24/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 6.59 AP - 00191996 12/24/2002 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 25.00 AP - 00191997 12/24/2002 CORDIAL GREETINGS BY THAYER 170.20 AP 00191998 12/24/2002 CORONA CDG 667.82 AP 00191999 12/24/2002 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 2,990.06 AP 00192001 12/24/2002 COVERMASTERINC 480.00 AP 00192002 12/24/2002 CRESTWOOD CORPORATION 772.50 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 154.87 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 90.86 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 37.30 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 184.74 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 161.05 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 191.95 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 314.52 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 417.52 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 354.69 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 238.30 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 329.97 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 465.93 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 59.07 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 43.48 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 153.84 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 144.21 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 78.50 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 157.96 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 218.73 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 99.92 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 126.03 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 74.17 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 19.93 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 40.39 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.09 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 73.35 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 142.51 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 179.23 AP- 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 46.57 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 187.83 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 154.18 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 725.17 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 916.65 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 99.23 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 41.42 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 133.91 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 57.90 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 128.43 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 24 Current Date: 01/08E: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 1,172.55 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 190.56 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 90.65 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 36.41 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 79.32 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 288.77 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 715.19 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 653.67 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 75.20 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2,097.57 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 101.98 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATERDIST 248.60 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 203.13 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 73.35 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 133.24 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 69.23 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 222.49 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 151.78 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 160.69 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 313.93 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 524.05 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 139.27 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 107.49 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 300.10 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 325.85 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 152.81 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 376.32 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 372.20 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 368.08 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 481.38 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 456.66 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 428.85 AP 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGACOWATERDIST 470.05 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 832.61 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 125.00 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 93.65 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 53.78 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 115.73 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 192.65 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 140.79 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 151.78 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 106.10 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 127.04 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 96.83 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 122.94 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 161.05 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 129.12 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 38.33 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 87.56 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 107.13 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 59.96 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 172.38 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 116.40 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 81.59 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 25 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_KEG_PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 190.92 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 146.27 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 135.30 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 156.93 AP- 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 92.71 AP- 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 45.54 AP- 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 135.30 AP- 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 76.58 AP - 00192005 12/24/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 47.60 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 1,050.00 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 2,625.00 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 1,050.00 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 700.00 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 945.00 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 280.00 AP - 00192006 12/24/2002 CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC 4,375.00 AP ~ 00192007 12/24/2002 D 7 CONSULTING INC 435.00 AP 00192007 12/24/2002 D7CONSULTINGINC 435.00 AP 00192008 12/24/2002 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP 00192009 12/24/2002 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP 00192009 12/24/2002 DICK, ERIC 50.00 AP 00192010 12/24/2002 EASTER, PAMELA 82.12 AP 00192011 12/24/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 115.28 AP - 00192011 12/24/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 121.02 AP - 00192011 12/24/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 308.65 AP - 00192011 12/24/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 69.48 AP - 00192013 12/24/2002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.32 AP- 00192014 12/24/2002 FIELDS, JUSTIN 100.00 AP- 00192015 12/24/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 588.80 AP- 00192015 12/24/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 607.75 AP - 00192015 12/24/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 441.60 AP- 00192017 12/24/2002 FLEET GLASS 223.01 AP - 00192019 12/24/2002 FREDERICK C. HEITMAN & DONNA R. HEITMA] 67.96 AP- 00192021 12/24/2002 GONZALES, ARACELI 200.00 AP - 00192023 12/24/2002 H.V. CARTER CO. INC 85.64 AP - 00192025 12/24/2002 HI LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 426.70 AP- 00192026 12/24/2002 HOCKWALD, CLARK 110.00 AP- 00192027 12/24/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 196.16 AP - 00192027 12/24/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 297.10 AP - 00192027 12/24/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 45.43 AP - 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 331.06 AP - 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 41.45 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 178.94 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 84.03 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 56.72 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 9.50 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 48.25 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 37.18 AP- 00192028 12/24/2002 HOME DEPOT/GECF 49.91 AP - 00192029 12/24/2002 HOSE MAN INC 27.64 AP - 00192029 12/24/2002 HOSE MAN INC 543.97 AP- 00192030 12/24/2002 IBM CORPORATION 7,264.26 AP - 00192031 12/24/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 65.02 AP - 00192031 12/24/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 120.63 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 26 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/?/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192031 12/24/2002 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 503.35 AP - 00192032 12/24/2002 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP 65.68 AP - 00192033 12/24/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 639.00 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 172.20 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 550.20 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 135.45 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 98.70 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 157.50 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 529.20 AP - 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 113.40 AP- 00192034 12/24/2002 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 163.80 AP - 00192035 12/24/2002 INTERFILM HOLDINGS INC 464.22 AP - 00192036 12/24/2002 INTERNATIONAL EZ UP INC 1,880.82 AP- 00192037 12/24/2002 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 1,438.50 AP - 00192038 12/24/2002 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 10,616.00 AP- 00192039 12/24/2002 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 401.00 AP- 00192041 12/24/2002 KB HOME 572.00 AP - 00192042 12/24/2002 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 149.41 AP - 00192044 12/24/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 440.00 AP - 00192044 12/24/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 264.00 AP- 00192044 12/24/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 12,805.16 AP - 00192044 12/24/2002 LILBURN CORPORATION 1,320.00 AP - 00192045 12/24/2002 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 234.77 AP - 00192046 12/24/2002 LOS ANGELES TIMES 58.20 AP - 00192047 12/24/2002 MAHMOND, A. ALY 127.00 AP - 00192048 12/24/2002 MAHMOND, MOHAMED 146.00 AP- 00192049 12/24/2002 MCCAIN, TRACY 62.00 AP- 00192050 12/24/2002 MIDDLESETTER, SALLY 200.00 AP-00192052 12/24/2002 MMASC 50.00 AP - 00192053 12/24/2002 MOBIL OIL #11454 212.27 AP - 00192054 12/24/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 131.46 AP- 00192054 12/24/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67 AP- 00192054 12/24/2002 MOBILE MINI [NC 130.38 AP - 00192054 12/24/2002 MOBILE MINI INC 85.67 AP - 00192055 12/24/2002 MT BALDY UNITED WAY 51.00 AP- 00192056 12/24/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 12,887.69 AP - 00192057 12/24/2002 NATURE TECH LANDSCAPE 389.19 AP - 00192057 12/24/2002 NATURE TECH LANDSCAPE 510.81 AP- 00192059 12/24/2002 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 16,920.00 AP- 00192060 12/24/2002 NEWMAN, ELAINE 140.00 AP - 00192061 12/24/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 93.48 AP - 00192062 12/24/2002 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 195.00 AP - 00192063 12/24/2002 NIKKIS FLAG SHOPPE 497.94 AP- 00192064 12/24/2002 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 140.00 AP- 00192065 12/24/2002 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 127.00 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDwARE 56.58 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 40.60 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE -11.84 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 29.49 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 116.06 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 164.04 AP- 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 57.86 AP - 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 25.84 AP- 00192066 t2/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.73 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 27 Current Date: 01/08/~ Repor t:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 15.07 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 75.41 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 73.23 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAKE 43.06 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 51.68 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 8.81 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.77 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 16.56 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 297.26 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 25.84 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 23.21 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 34.42 AP 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 36.64 AP - 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 47.40 AP - 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 51.68 AP - 00192066 12/24/2002 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 109.29 AP- 00192067 12/24/2002 OWEN ELECTRIC 308.56 AP - 00192068 12/24/2002 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 262.55 AP - 00192069 12/24/2002 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 45,602.25 AP- 00192070 12/24/2002 PAJARITO, MONICA 48.00 AP- 00192071 12/24/2002 PARSAC 10,247.26 AP- 00192071 12/24/2002 PARSAC 25,600.54 AP - 00192072 12/24/2002 PATTON SALES CORP 230.80 AP - 00192074 12/24/2002 PEREZ, RICAKDO 62.00 AP - 00192075 12/24/2002 PEREZ, RITA 200.00 AP- 00192076 12/24/2002 PERPETUAL STORAGE 18.00 AP- 00192076 12/24/2002 PERPETUAL STORAGE 3.87 AP- 00192077 12/24/2002 PETERMAN LUMBER 176.15 AP- 00192078 12/24/2002 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,220.05 AP - 00192079 12/24/2002 POURHASSANIAN, ABBY 95.00 AP - 00192080 12/24/2002 PREMIER PET PRODUCTS 95.83 AP - 00192081 12/24/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,681.30 AP- 00192081 12/24/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 68,998.20 AP- 00192081 12/24/2002 PRINCIPAL LIFE 15,482.10 AP- 00192082 12/24/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 883.09 AP - 00192083 12/24/2002 R C HOMES LLC 277,000.00 AP - 00192084 12/24/2002 R H F INC 61.00 AP - 00192085 12/24/2002 RAUSCH, CARL J 129.20 AP- 00192086 12/24/2002 RCPFA 4,145.41 AP - 00192087 12/24/2002 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP- 00192088 12/24/2002 REDINGER, TOM 60.00 AP- 00192089 12/24/2002 RH TECHNOLOGY 1,024.00 AP - 00192091 12/24/2002 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES 49.00 AP- 00192092 12/24/2002 RIDGELINE ROOFING 675.00 AP- 00192093 12/24/2002 RIVAS, MIGUEL 100.00 AP- 00192094 12/24/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 160.98 AP - 00192094 12/24/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 7.11 AP- 00192094 12/24/2002 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 160.98 AP- 00192095 12/24/2002 RMA GROUP 190.00 AP- 00192096 12/24/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 175.00 AP - 00192096 12/24/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 35.00 AP- 00192096 12/24/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 60.00 AP - 00192097 12/24/2002 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 399.19 AP - 00192097 12/2-4/2002 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 154.46 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 28 Current Date: 01/08E: Report:CK AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192097 12/24/2002 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 125.44 AP - 00192099 12/24/2002 S B AND O INC 660.00 AP- 00192100 12/24/2002 SAFETY IMAGES 341.85 AP ~ 00192101 12/24/2002 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 475.93 AP - 00192102 12/24/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY 12.00 AP 00192103 12/24/2002 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO INC 644.35 AP 00192104 12/24/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC -1,467.68 AP 00192104 12/24/2002 SILVIACONSTRUCTIONINC 16,144.43 AP 00192105 12/24/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC -1,470.15 AP 00192105 12/24/2002 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 16,171.65 AP 00192106 12/24/2002 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 166.94 AP 00192107 12/24/2002 SIMPLOTPARTNERS 425.40 AP 00192107 12/24/2002 S1MPLOTPARTNERS 1,663.77 AP- 00192109 12/24/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 161.79 AP- 00192109 12/24/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 202.28 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.22 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.14 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 124.65 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127.01 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.48 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.20 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,167.77 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,024.55 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.28 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.22 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.51 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 258.85 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.51 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.08 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.48 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.68 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.91 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.37 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.08 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 29 Current Date: 0~/08/~ Report:CKAGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.51 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.22 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.31 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.47 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.59 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.36 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.45 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.18 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.93 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.94 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.81 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.37 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.07 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.78 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.22 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.89 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.03 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.05 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.47 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.61 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.16 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.50 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.68 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 191.76 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.71 AP - 00192115 '12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 206.88 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.63 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.39 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.53 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.65 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.31 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.20 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.46 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFOP..NIA EDISON 13.94 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.94 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 30 Current Date: 01/08L~ Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHEKN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.50 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.38 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.59 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.45 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.03 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.28 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.12 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.26 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.14 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.80 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.97 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.61 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.84 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.12 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL~ EDISON 123.59 AP 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 201.30 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 195.86 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.91 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.15 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.14 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155.27 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 185.89 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORaNIA EDISON 14.39 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.66 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.39 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.88 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.93 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 001921 l 5 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.03 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 31 Current Date: 01/08/5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.07 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.63 AP- 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.73 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.74 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.18 AP - 00192115 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.43 AP - 00192116 12/24/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20,000.00 AP - 00192117 12/24/2002 SOUTHWESTERN BAG CO 978.25 AP- 00192119 12/24/2002 SPECTRA COMPANY 375.00 AP - 00192119 12/24/2002 SPECTRA COMPANY 2,061.00 AP - 00192120 12/24/2002 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER [NC 50.94 AP - 00192121 12/24/2002 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 1,279.68 AP- 00192122 12/24/2002 STATE NET 275.00 AP- 00192123 12/24/2002 STETKEVICH, OREST 40.00 AP- 00192124 12/24/2002 STEVES TOWING 400.00 AP- 00192125 12/24/2002 SUNRISE FORD -85.53 AP - 00192125 12/24/2002 SUNRISE FORD 111.00 AP- 00192125 12/24/2002 SUNRISE FORD 43.12 AP- 00192127 12/24/2002 TANDEM 348.50 AP- 00192128 12/24/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 130.00 AP- 00192128 12/24/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 178.00 AP- 00192128 12/24/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 134.00 AP- 00192128 12/24/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 112.00 AP- 00192128 12/24/2002 TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 162.00 AP- 00192128 12/24/2002 TE1LM[NIX INTERNATIONAL 1,520.00 AP - 00192129 12/24/2002 THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES INC, HOWARD F 39.38 AP - 00192130 12/24/2002 TOOLS R US 67.20 AP- 00192131 12/24/2002 TRANSAMERICAN SOIL 782.30 AP - 00192132 12/24/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 2,265.00 AP - 00192133 12/24/2002 U P S SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT INC 217.67 AP - 00192133 12/24/2002 U P S SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT INC 167.87 AP- 00192134 12/24/2002 U S BANK TRUST 825.00 AP- 00192134 12/24/2002 U S BANK TRUST 825.00 AP- 00192134 12/24/2002 U S BANK TRUST 825.00 AP - 00192134 12/24/2002 U S BANK TRUST 3,350.00 AP - 00192134 12/24/2002 U S BANK TRUST 3,200.00 AP - 00192134 12/24/2002 U S BANK TRUST 825.00 AP - 00192135 12/24/2002 U T I 104.00 AP - 00192135 12/24/2002 UTI 251.55 AP - 00192136 12/24/2002 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 287.50 AP - 00192137 12/24/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 131.67 AP- 00192137 12/24/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 569.03 AP - 00192137 12/24/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 20.58 AP - 00192137 12/24/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 66.90 AP - 00192137 12/24/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 34.34 AP 00192137 12/24/2002 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 24.27 AP 00192138 12/24/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 35.72 AP 00192140 12/24/2002 VASQUEZ SR, RUBEN 100.00 AP 00192141 12/24/2002 VEND U VENDING 69.70 AP 00192142 12/24/2002 VERBERA, PHIL 800.00 AP 00192142 12/24/2002 VERBEKA, PHIL 800.00 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 69.98 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 31.33 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 28.67 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 32 Current Date: 01/08/5 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. .92. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A~enda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.68 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 36.26 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 106.53 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 31.98 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 43.85 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 28.68 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 55.81 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 27.57 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 24.91 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 23.73 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 34.62 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 24.37 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 31.39 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.24 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.24 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 31.33 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 24.18 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.95 AP-00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 22.64 AP- 00192143 12/24/2002 VERIZON 97.15 AP- 00192145 12/24/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 450.00 AP- 00192146 12/24/2002 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 5,983.86 AP - 00192147 12/24/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 32.43 AP - 00192147 12/24/2002 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 66.72 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 724.77 AP-00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 873.69 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 402.80 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 19.73 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 579.19 AP-00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 231.55 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 130.80 AP-00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 339.54 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 73.96 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 578.90 AP- 00192148 12/24/2002 WAXIE 368.07 AP - 00192149 12/24/2002 WEST COAST CUSTOM ROOMS 38.00 AP - 00192150 12/24/2002 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 57.66 AP- 00192151 12/24/2002 WHITE, LARRY 70.00 AP- 00192152 12/24/2002 WILLIAMS, DIANE 30.00 AP- 00192154 12/24/2002 YEE, LARRY 92.00 AP- 00192155 t2/24/2002 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1,240.72 AP- 00192156 12/24/2002 ZWISSLER, JAMES 35.00 AP - 00192157 12/30/2002 CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS 1,365.00 AP- 00192158 12/31/2002 3M COMPANY 506.54 AP- 00192159 12/31/2002 3M TRAFFIC CONTROL 28,877.00 AP - 00192160 12/31/2002 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 147.62 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 33 Current Date: 01/08/7: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 tttrough 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 27.23 AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 14.55 AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 97.08 AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 25.86 AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 40.41 AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 272.33 AP- 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 89.00 AP - 00192161 12/31/2002 ABC LOCKSMITHS 107.75 AP- 00192162 12/31/2002 ABLAC 294.06 AP- 00192163 12/31/2002 ABLETRONICS 3.25 AP - 00192163 12/31/2002 ABLETRONICS 16.44 AP - 00192164 12/31/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 1,024.00 AP- 00192164 12/31/2002 ADAMSON, RONALD 992.00 AP - 00192167 12/31/2002 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 3,357.93 AP - 00192168 12/31/2002 ALLEN, SYLVESTER R 249.09 AP - 00192170 12/31/2002 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,421.00 AP- 00192171 12/31/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 425.97 AP- 00192171 12/31/2002 ARCH WIRELESS 1,137.66 AP - 00192172 12/31/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 780.00 AP - 00192172 12/31/2002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 60.10 AP - 00192173 12/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 420.72 AP - 00192173 12/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 41.12 AP - 00192173 12/31/2002 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 340.35 AP- 00192174 12/31/2002 ASSI SECURITY 125.00 AP - 00192175 12/31/2002 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 3,500.00 AP- 00192175 12/31/2002 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 3,500.00 AP- 00192175 12/31/2002 ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES 3,500.00 AP - 00192176 12/31/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 551.72 AP - 00192176 12/31/2002 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 421.97 AP - 00192178 12/31/2002 BALABIS, DANNY 25.00 AP- 00192179 12/31/2002 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 79.69 AP- 00192180 12/31/2002 BILLS FENCE CO 583.00 AP- 00192181 12/31/2002 BORDNER, MARGIE 120.00 AP- 00192181 12/31/2002 BORDNER, MARGIE 300.00 AP - 00192185 12/31/2002 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 3,467.50 AP - 00192185 12/31/2002 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 4,683.32 AP - 00192186 12/31/2002 CALBO 215.00 AP - 00192189 12/31/2002 CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MA1NT CO INC 23,910.44 AP - 00192189 12/31/2002 CALIFORNIA PAVEMENT MAINT CO INC 25,083.37 AP- 00192190 12/31/2002 CALSENSE 382.38 AP- 00192192 12/31/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 167.66 AP- 00192193 12/31/2002 CENTRAL DIVISION 359.72 AP - 00192194 12/31/2002 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 8.62 AP - 00192194 12/31/2002 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 25.86 AP - 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC -3.24 AP - 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 218.65 AP- 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 36.87 AP - 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 94.77 AP - 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO 1NC 15.35 AP - 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 322.22 AP - 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO [NC -15.35 AP- 00192195 12/31/2002 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 89.38 AP - 00t92196 12/31/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 120.78 AP - 00192196 12/31/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 13.95 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 34 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192196 12/31/2002 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 5.08 AP - 00192197 12/31/2002 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SA! -1,011.58 AP - 00192197 12/31/2002 COMARK GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATION SAI 1,130.58 AP- 00192199 12/31/2002 CONCANNON, SHARI 149.50 AP- 00192201 12/31/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 200.00 AP - 00192202 12/31/2002 COURT TRUSTEE 118.50 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 157.63 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,093.64 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 341.30 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 25.08 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 229.70 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 23.02 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 218.37 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 594.32 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 594.68 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 323.43 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 901.83 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 149.03 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 738.88 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 843.94 AP ~ 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 454.17 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 224.91 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 303.19 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 226.61 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,662.20 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 353.66 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 453.57 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 287.74 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 866.60 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 204.31 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 81.38 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 192.98 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 69.57 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 737.85 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 441.01 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 586.71 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 427.82 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,287.87 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 591.41 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 64.42 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 520.16 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 273.32 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 37.44 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 256.84 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 119.85 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 119.85 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 85.50 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 121.91 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 1,022.13 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 227.64 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 756.39 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 308.34 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 165.17 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 210.13 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 35 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3, ,55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 85.71 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 135.30 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 351.60 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 347.12 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 114.70 AP- 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 960.33 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 279.17 AP - 00192204 12/31/2002 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 83.35 AP - 00192205 12/31/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 192.88 AP - 00192205 12/31/2002 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 526.90 AP - 00192206 12/31/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 14,188.13 AP - 00192206 12/31/2002 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 44,470.00 AP- 00192207 12/31/2002 DATA QUICK 91.17 AP - 00192208 12/31/2002 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 215.10 AP - 00192209 12/31/2002 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 8.91 AP - 00192209 12/31/2002 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 39.90 AP- 00192210 12/31/2002 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 559.21 AP - 00192211 12/31/2002 DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC 8,343.80 AP - 00192212 12/31/2002 DROP & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 500.00 AP 00192213 12/31/2002 EASYLINK SERVICES CORP. 10.36 AP 00192215 12/31/2002 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 5,660.02 AP 00192216 12/31/2002 ESGILCORPORATION 26,754.32 AP 00192217 12/31/2002 EVANS SPORTING GOODS 16,192.24 AP 00192218 12/31/2002 EWlNG IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 124.77 AP 00192218 12/31/2002 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,190.44 AP 00192219 12/31/2002 EXCLUSIVEEMAGES 14.00 AP 00192220 12/31/2002 FAUST PRINTING INC 1,643.19 AP- 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 662.40 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 680.00 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 662.40 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 594.00 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 473.98 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 248.63 AP- 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 441.60 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 340.20 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,080.00 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 437.75 AP - 00192222 12/31/2002 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 458.25 AP- 00192224 12/31/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 168.17 AP - 00192224 12/31/2002 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1,188.09 AP - 00192225 12/31/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 195.51 AP - 00192225 12/31/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 168.94 AP - 00192225 12/31/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 240.95 AP - 00192225 12/31/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 26.57 AP - 00192225 12/31/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 23.55 AP - 00192225 12/31/2002 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,553.18 AP - 00192226 12/31/2002 FRANKLIN COVEY CO 28.66 AP- 00192227 12/31/2002 FURMAN, ROLAND 425.00 AP - 00192230 12/31/2002 GIANT INLAND EMPIRE RV CENTER 4,714.01 AP - 00192231 12/31/2002 GOLDEN WEST DISTRIBUTING 99.34 AP - 00192232 12/31/2002 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATI 550.00 AP- 00192233 12/31/2002 GRAINGER, WW 81.62 AP- 00192234 12/31/2002 GUARDIAN 2,952.35 AP - 00192236 12/31/2002 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 385.65 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 36 Current Date: 01/08/2 Report:CK_AGENDAREG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192237 12/31/2002 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 311.40 AP- 00192238 12/31/2002 HARDY, BRADLEY 260.50 AP - 00192239 12/31/2002 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 165.36 AP - 00192239 12/31/2002 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 388.72 AP- 00192240 12/31/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 190.72 AP - 00192240 12/31/2002 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 31.25 AP - 00192241 12/31/2002 HOSE MAN [NC 48.46 AP - 00192241 12/31/2002 HOSE MAN [NC 13.63 AP - 00192241 12/31/2002 HOSE MAN [NC 33.45 AP - 00192241 12/31/2002 HOSE MAN [NC 108.73 AP - 00192242 12/31/2002 HURST, CHERYL 288.50 AP - 00192243 12/31/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 335.97 AP - 00192243 12/31/2002 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC 23.37 AP 00192244 12/31/2002 IBM CORPORATION 119.95 AP 00192245 12/31/2002 ICBO 195.00 AP 00192248 12/31/2002 IEEA 310.00 AP 00192250 12/31/2002 INLAND EMPIRE CONSULTANTS 5,000.00 AP 00192252 12/31/2002 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP 494.00 AP 00192253 12/31/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 1,239.12 AP 00192253 12/31/2002 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 103.31 AP 00192255 12/31/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 899.52 AP 00192255 12/31/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 744.47 AP 00192255 12/31/2002 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1,106.19 AP - 00192256 12/31/2002 INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND 120.00 AP- 00192257 12/31/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 1,030.51 AP - 00192257 12/31/2002 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 43,511.20 AP- 00192259 12/31/2002 LOWER, DARLENE 251.00 AP - 00192260 12/31/2002 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 48.39 AP - 00192263 12/31/2002 N M A DUES C/O NAOMI ROBERTS 13.85 AP - 00192264 12/31/2002 NATIONAL DEFERRED 24,236.49 AP- 00192265 12/31/2002 NATURE TECH LANDSCAPE 10,179.81 AP- 00192265 12/31/2002 NATURE TECH LANDSCAPE 11,527.69 AP - 00192266 12/31/2002 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00192267 12/31/2002 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 77.35 AP - 00192268 12/31/2002 OTT, LAURA 45.00 AP- 00192268 12/31/2002 OTT, LAURA 207.00 AP- 00192268 12/31/2002 OTT, LAURA 69.00 AP- 00192269 12/31/2002 OTT, SHARON 87.50 AP- 00192269 12/31/2002 OTT, SHARON 70.00 AP- 00192270 12/31/2002 PRESTON, MICHELE 50.00 AP - 00192271 12/31/2002 PSOMAS 5,553.56 AP - 00192271 12/31/2002 PSOMAS 5,302.50 AP- 00192272 12/31/2002 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 51.72 AP- 00192273 12/31/2002 QUINTANA, ZITA 193.00 AP - 00192274 12/31/2002 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 212.34 AP- 00192277 12/31/2002 REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA 282.50 AP- 00192278 12/31/2002 RETROLIGHTS INC 66.50 AP - 00192279 12/31/2002 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT 226.00 AP - 00192281 12/31/2002 RMA GROUP 24,390.50 AP - 00192282 12/31/2002 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 72.50 AP- 00192283 12/31/2002 SAND S WORLDWIDE 1,205.18 AP - 00192284 12/31/2002 S C A C E O 250.00 AP - 00192285 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 289.68 AP - 00192286 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN' 220.00 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 37 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAITRC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192288 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 44.00 AP- 00192289 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 13,333.34 AP- 00192289 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 1,040,111.66 AP - 00192289 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 23,704.17 AP- 00192289 12/31/2002 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS 15,320.83 AP- 00192291 12/31/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 62.00 AP- 00192291 12/31/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 147.00 AP 00192291 12/31/2002 SENCHAL, CAL 70.00 AP 00192292 12/31/2002 SILVIACONSTRUCTIONINC 37,440.11 AP 00192293 12/31/2002 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 218.50 AP 00192293 12/31/2002 SIMS, DIANA LAURIE 250.00 AP 00192294 12/31/2002 SMARTANDFINAL 35.53 AP 00192295 12/31/2002 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,090.56 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.26 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96.19 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.28 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.21 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.35 AP 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.18 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.23 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.49 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.44 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.83 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.56 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.90 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 161.71 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.55 AP ~ 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.65 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.91 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.91 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.53 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOL~THERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 214.79 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.67 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.02 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144.91 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.90 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 787.39 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.31 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.05 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.32 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.64 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 38 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRA1T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.19 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.66 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 164.54 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 675.97 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.25 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.25 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.39 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.50 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.23 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.09 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.20 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.08 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.09 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.91 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.10 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.96 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.84 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 143.44 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.72 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.48 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.74 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.15 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.48 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.18 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.04 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.50 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.46 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.61 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.96 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.77 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,148.60 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.79 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.02 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.00 AP - 00192299 I2/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 175.10 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.33 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.99 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 148.98 AP- 00192299 12/3t/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 169.76 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.56 AP - 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.82 AP- 00192299 12/31/2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.50 AP - 00192300 12/31/2002 STOFA, JOSEPH 24.00 AP- 00192301 12/31/2002 STREET TREE SEMINAR 375.00 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 39 Current Date: 01/08/7: Report:CK_AGENDA_REGPORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP- 00192302 12/31/2002 SUN, THE 132.00 AP- 00192303 12/31/2002 SUNRISE FORD 248.51 AP- 00192304 12/31/2002 TARDENCILLA, RUTH 17.50 AP - 00192305 12/31/2002 TARGET 53.77 AP - 00192308 12/31/2002 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 75.00 AP - 00192309 12/31/2002 TRUGREEN LANDCARE REGIONAL 2,020.00 AP - 00192311 12/31/2002 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 47,853.60 AP - 00192312 12/31/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 19.86 AP- 00192312 12/31/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 51.27 AP - 00192312 12/31/2002 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 19.34 AP- 00192313 12/31/2002 UNITED TRAFFIC 2,747.63 AP- 00192314 12/31/2002 UNITED WAY 620.32 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 1,338.95 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 57.31 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 382.82 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 36.88 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.91 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 131.02 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 35.43 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 29.08 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 233.50 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 22.24 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 43.21 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 27.70 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.91 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VEPdZON 91.33 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.91 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 27.72 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 29.47 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 32.38 AP 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 43.35 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 29.13 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.82 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.91 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 31.32 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 179.16 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 33.35 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 23.57 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 141.15 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 56.02 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 94.43 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 56.76 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 55.08 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 54.69 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 86.28 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 35.09 User: ahunsber- Ann Hunsberger Page: 40 Current Date: 01/0SE: Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 8.11 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 77.84 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 206.42 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 582.45 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 466.48 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 40.51 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 47.28 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 48.77 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 56.22 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 163.90 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 86.00 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VEKIZON 90.85 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 2&15 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 67.93 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 29.20 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 28.66 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.88 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.91 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 90.85 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 27.71 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 395.00 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 27.71 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 32.17 A? - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 56.84 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 31.82 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 28.15 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 33.76 AP-00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 92.80 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 92.80 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 89.48 AP - 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 36.88 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 31.82 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 127.99 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 27.70 AP- 00192317 12/31/2002 VERIZON 150.04 AP- 00192318 12/31/2002 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 450.00 AP - 00192319 12/31/2002 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 7,t91.18 AP - 00192320 12/31/2002 VOLM, LIZA 112.50 AP- 00192321 12/31/2002 WAXIE 186.47 AP- 00192321 12/31/2002 WAXIE 2,820.36 AP - 00192323 12/31/2002 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 12,379.11 AP- 00192324 12/31/2002 WEST, AMBER 22.99 AP - 00192325 12/31/2002 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 56,135.00 AP - 00192327 12/31/2002 XEROX CORPOKATION 10,594.45 AP- 00192327 12/31/2002 XEROX CORPORATION 32.94 AP - 00192328 12/31/2002 YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC, E L 430,682.40 AP - 00192329 1/2/2003 KO1LANDA CONSTRUCTION 1,360.40 AP - 00192329 1/2/2003 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 2,397.50 AP - 00192330 I/6/2003 LAM, JACK 100.00 AP - 00192331 1/6/2003 SAFEWAY SIGN 506.54 User: ahunsber - Arm Hunsberger Page: 41 Current Date: 01/08/~ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 12/11/2002 through 1/7/2003 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount Total for Check ID AP: 5,952,432.55 Total for Entity: 5,952,432.55 User: ahunsber - Ann Hunsberger Page: 42 Current Date: 01/08/.~ Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:3. City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary December 31, 2002 Par Market BOO~ % of Days to YTM Y'rM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 36,580,944.32 36,580,944.32 36,580,944.32 24.06 1 1 2.269 2.30 I Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,517,231.44 1,515,000.00 1.00 365 238 1.720 1.744 Commercial Paper- Discount 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,989,031.95 6.57 30 9 1.301 1.320 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 104,000,000.00 105,259,824.24 103,960,556.25 68.37 1,598 t ,215 4.593 4.656 Investments 152,095,944.32 153,358,000.00 152,045,532.52 100.00% 1,098 834 3.789 3.841 Cash PasspeoldChecking 582,497.05 582,497.05 582,497.05 I I 0.493 0.500 (not included in y~eld calculations) Total Cash and Investments 152,678,441.37 153,940,497.05 152,628,029.57 1,098 834 3.789 3.841 Total Earnings December 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year TO Date Current Year 478,296.55 2,988,864.24 Average Daily Balance 146,774,111.33 149,069,517.08 Effective Rate of Return 3.84% 3.98% I certify that this mporl accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21, 2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated ex~gnditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pdcing sen4ce. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents govem the management of these funds. Po~folio CITY CP Run Date: 01/07/2co3 o 15:15 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2002 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investn~nt · Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 36,580,944.32 36,580,944.32 36,580,944.32 2.301 2.269 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments December 31, 2002 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Federal Agency Issues - Discount Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 01/07/20~3 - 15:15 PM (PRF_PM2) Sy~tRe~t V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash December 31, 2002 Portfolio CITY CP RH~t Da e: 01~07~2003 - 15:15 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRe~t V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page5 Activity By Type December 1, 2002 through December 31,2002 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) Savings/Missellancous Accounts (Monthly Summary) Certificates of Depcolt/Neg. - Bank Commercial Paper - Discount 74838VNE0 1171 QUINCY CAPITAL 1.310 12/31/2002 4,997,452.78 0.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Federal Agency Issues - Discount '~ Portfolio CITY ~ cP Run Date: 01K)Tf2003 - 15:15 PM (PRF_PM3) S~nRept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended November 30, 2002 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Pavina A(rent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.85% $ 257,311.78 Masi Plaza ]mprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.85% 243,544.11 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund Fimt American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.83% 1,200.39 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 502,056.28 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ 0.04 Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.85% 582,336.34 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.85% 1,093,989.38 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.85% 126,483.86 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,802,809.62 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS . $ 2,304,865.90 * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. '~ i:th~ancelCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 1/7/2003 11:01 AM E ~GiN EE RINC DE PARThiaN T $ Repor DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ BY: SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1446176-0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the East Avenue Street Improvements from Banyan Street to north of 23~ Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project will widen the west half of East Avenue from Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) to 23~d Street, and construct the west half of East Avenue from 23rd Street to approximately 550 feet northerly. The improvements will provide access to the new Fire Station located north of 23rd Street. The project will be funded from Measure I funds (Account No. 11763035650/1446176-0). Staff prepared and the City Engineer approved a Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA guidelines. The project plans and specifiCations were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $602,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate of $9,400 for streetlights, $9,000 for construction survey, $7,500 for soils and material testing, and $500 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for CITY STAFF REPORT Re: East Avenue Improvements - Notice Inviting Bids January 15, 2003 Page 2 January 21, 2003 and January 28, 2003, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 11,2003, unless extended by Addenda. Respectfully submitted, ~ WilliarrL~. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution ,50 SOLUTION NO. 0.3- 0 0 Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVINO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS POR THE "EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET" lin SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamohga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23m>-STREET". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 11, 2003, sealed bids or proposals for the "EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23Rv STREET" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23RD STREET". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice 'is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate s/ RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 2 of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any appmnticable occupation to apply to 'the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Con[factor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight joumeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices oi' journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. ,5'2. RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work heroin before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the Submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class "C12" license (Earthwork and Paving Contractor) sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE 'DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "EAST AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN STREET TO NORTH OF 23R° STREET" may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4037. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 15th day of January, 2003 RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 5 Publish Dates: January 21, 2003 and January 28, 2003 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 15th day of January, 2003. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of January, 2003. Executed this 15th day of Jant~ary, 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: January 21, 2003 and January 28, 2003 ,5'5 VICINITY MAP EAST AVE. STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM BANYAN ST. (SUMMIT AVE.) TO PROPOSED FIRE STATION (N/O 23RD ST.) PROJECT LOCATION Almond Rd -- Hillside Rd ~-- Route 30 er construction) ~land Ay Fool EXHIBIT "A" R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A · ~NGINEERING ~EPART~IENT Staff Report DA'IE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer /~ BY: SUBJECT': APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM PREVIOUSLY DEPOSITED DEVELOPER PAYMENT PLACED IN TRUST ACCOUNT NO. 18820002314 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Fisher Drive Street Improvements from East Avenue to Mulberry Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: This project will complete the street improvements, including constructing a retaining wall and widening Fisher Drive (formerly Highland Avenue) from East Avenue to Mulberry Street. The improvements will provide secondary access to the homes in the area. The project will be funded from developer deposited in-lieu fees. These improvements were to be completed by the developer, but he was unable to do so because of interference by the Route 210/30 freeway construction. Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines: The project plans and specifications were completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate is $200,000, including a 10% contingency, plus an additional estimate of $5,000 for streetlights, $5,000 for construction survey, $1,000 for soils and material testing, and $500 for printing services. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 21 and January 28, 2003, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 11, 2003, unless extended by Addenda. City Engineer .5'7 RESOLUTION NO. ~ '~° ~ ~)'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 11, 2003, sealed bids or proposals for the "FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 2 of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucfimonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 17.77.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 Page 4 On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a Specialty Class License sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and roles and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractorts sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The C. ity of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the fight to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "FISHER DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM EAST AVENUE TO MULBERRY STREET" may be directed to: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, ext. 4037. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 15th day of January, 2003 Publish Dates: January 21 and January 28, 2003 RESOLUTION NO. January 15, 2003 ~ Page 5 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Cotmcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 15th day of January, 2003. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of January, 2003. Executed this 15th day of January, 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: January 21 and January 28, 2003 I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY S E I~VIC E& S fRel: rt DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and City Council Members Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services D~ BY: Nettle Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor',._'~,...J SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION OF TWO (2) ELECTRIC CARTS FROM THE GEMcar COMPANY RECOMMENDATION Community Services staff recommends that the City Council accept the donation of two (2) electric utility carts from Global Electric Motorcars (GEMcar) Company to the department for use at City special events. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS In August, the National Park Service and Global Electric Motors sponsored the GEMcar Vehicle Donation Program. The GEMcar Company generously donated approximately 1,000 electric utility carts to the National Park Service and to park and recreation agencies across the nation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department was selected to receive two vehicles, outfitted with short utility beds for use at programs or events. These vehicles are street legal and can be charged with a standard electrical outlet. The City will be responsible for licensing and maintaining the vehicles. Community Services has consulted with Engineering on these matters and confirmed the availability of service from their operation, with vehicles permanently assigned to Community Services. These vehicles will be helpful tools in our management of programs and events and we are looking forward to the opportunity to promote the use of electric vehicles as environmentally friendl,, alternatives to gasoline powered carts. ~ ~itted, Com ~unity Services Director I:\COMMSERV~Council&Boards\CityCouncil\StaffReports~002\G EMcar 1.15.03.doc RAN C H O C U C A M O N G A COI, IMU NITY SERVICES Staff Report TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Iii DATE: January 15, 2003 SUBJECT: Approval of a Free Angels-Quakes Youth Baseball Clinic at the Rancho Epicenter Stadium on January 25, 2003 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a free youth baseball clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on January 25, 2003, and waive associated fees and charges. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from Valley Baseball Inc. to hold a free youth baseball clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on Saturday, January 25, 2003. The Clinic would be held in cooperation with the Anaheim Angels and will feature coaches from the Angels and Quakes players. The clinic is proposed to be a 3-hour program that focuses on improvement of youngsters' baseball skills. Angel's coaches and Quakes players will run the clinic. The clinic will be open to both boys and girls ranging in age between 6 and 12 years of age. Featured activities include interactive pitching, batting and fielding instruction. There will also be a question and answer session for parents and coaches. The event will be primarily marketed to local Little League players through flyers and contact with the Little Leagues' Boards of Directors. The clinic will be free of charge to the youngsters and can accommodate approximately 500-1,500 children. Staff recommends that City Council consider the waiver of fees associated with the proposed free youth baseball clinic as the event directly supports the City's intent for Valley Baseball Club Inc. to host programs at the Epicenter for youngsters in our community. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of fees associated with this event will total $2,250. Community Services Director h~COMMSERV~c~unci~&B~ards~cityc~unci~StaffRep~[tsi2~3tAnge~sQuakesY~uthBaseba~C~inic1~25~3~c~c 2003 Angels-Quakes Baseball Clinic · The Quakes, in conjunction with the Anaheim Angels, will host a FREE baseball clinic on Saturday, January 25, 2003, featuring Angels coaches and Quakes players · Event time will run from approximately 9:00 am to 12:00 pm at the Epicenter · Boys and girls, ages 6-12, of all skill levels will be allowed to participate at NO COST · World Champion Anaheim Angels participants that have confirmed thus far: Clyde Wright Steve Solis Bobby Mitchell Wes Clement Jim Eppard Quakes Players: Rich Fischer Ryan Webb · More Angels participants are still to confirm! · The clinic will primarily be marketed to local Little Leaguers, through flyers and contact with Board of Directors members · Number of clinic participants will range anywhere from 500-1,500 · Angels coaches will lead instruction in hitting, fielding, pitching, and catching. There will also be a dugout Q & A session for parents and coaches. · Registration will take place at the stadium just prior to the day's event SI, Rq: DATE: January 15, 2003 TO:. Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,000 TO ACCT NO. 11763035650/1448176-0 FROM THE MEASURE I FUND BALANCE TO PURCHASE RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM COLrNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, PAY FOR COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INSPECTION FEES AND REPRODUCTION COSTS RELATED TO THE MILLIKEN AVENUE / WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION PROJECT TO BE FLrNDED FROM ACCT. NO 11763035650/144/176-0 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended City Council approve a budget appropriation for Fund 11763035650/1448176-0 (Measure I) in the amount of $6,000 for the Milliken Avenue / Wilson Avenue Extension Project to purchase right-of-way from County of San Bernardino, pay for County Flood Control District inspection fees and reproduction costs related to the project. BACKGROUND: The City acquired this project from the Chaffey Joint Union High School District in the Fall of 2002 and therefore is not a budgeted item. Before this project can start construction, the city must purchase right of way from the County and acquire a permit from the County Flood Control District (pay for inspection fees) and reproduce the plans and specifications. The requested appropriation is to cover these costs. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH:dlw MILLIKEN AVENUE/WILSON AVENUE EXTENSION I~ITTJ.rg~.N AVE.- FROM 1380'+ NORTH OF BANYAN STR~T TO ~ILSON AVE. ~IL~ON AY~NUE - FROM DAYCRggg CHANNgL TO ~m.t.tm~ AVENUE  CITY 0H RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTHENT SlaffReport DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jori A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM BENSON AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000, AND APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION OF $15,000 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1124-303-5650-1248124-0 FROM THE TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Change Order No. 1 to Kimley-Horn and Associates for the design of Traffic Signal Interconnect System on Base Line Road from Benson Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue in the amount of $15,000, and approval of an appropriation of $15,000 to Account No. 1~24-303-1248124-0 from the Transportation Fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: ~ In September of 2001, the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland were awarded a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant in the amount of $100,000 for a joint signal timing and synchronization project on Base Line Road from Benson Avenue in the City of Upland to Etiwanda Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Also, in November of 2001, the City received a grant from the San Manuel Indians in the amount of $100,000 for traffic congestion improvements. The CMAQ funds, the grant money from the San Manuel Indians, and City Transportation funds will be used to pay for the construction of this project. SUBJECT: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM BENSON AVENUE TO ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND APPROPRIATE $15,000 FROM FUND BALANCE 1124, TO ACCOUNT NO. 1124-303-5650-1248124-0. January 15, 2002 Page 2 On March 20, 2002, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $112,000 to Kimley-Hom and Associates for the preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimate for the installation of a traffic signal interconnect system on Base Line Road from Alta Cuesta in the west to Milliken Avenue in the east. This change order is necessary because we revised the plans and specifications to include the provision of a separate conduit for a future City owned fiber optic communication system, and a third conduit for a Charter Communications cable system in the same trench as the traffic signal interconnect system. In the opinion of City staff, the addition of a conduit for a future City owned fiber optic communication system, and a conduit for a future Charter Communications cable system is a significant increase in the scope of this project, and a change order is justified. R~es_p..e_ctfu Ily submitted, City Engineer Attachment 1226staff PROJECT LOCATION --. ........... -- iiiiCHINOii IIL~ VICINITY MAP T H E C I T Y 0 F i~AN C It 0 C U CA~ 0 N GA S rff Report DATE: January 15, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A FOUR MONTH TIME EXTENSION TO DESIGNATE CHERRY LANE AS A PRIVATE STREET, THEREBY EXEMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL; CODE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, granting the Cherry Lane applicants a four month time extension to complete the conditions of approval and requirements set forth by Ordinance 58-C for a private street designation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On July 5, 1989, City Council adopted Ordinance 58-C, which established a mechanism for the review and determination of whether a street could be designated as a private residential street. This would thereby exempt the abutting properties from Municipal Code requirements for dedication of public right-of-way and construction of public improvements. On July 17, 2002 City Council passed Resolution No. 02-215 with the following recommended requirements to be completed within six (6) months, before placing Cherry Lane on the City's approved list of designated private streets. Ordinance 58 and the requirements for dedication and improvements will still be required until such time as all of the conditions are met. A. Access width to be a minimum of 26', with no parking on either side, 36' with parking on one side, or 46' with parking on both sides. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CHERRY LANE DESIGNATION January 15, 2003 Page 2 B. Access height shall be a minimum of 14'6", clear of all obstructions, including tree limbs, brush, etc. C. Surface shall be an approved all-weather treatment, such as pavement, concrete, or other approved material. D. The street shall have address identification, e.g. street sign, address directory for the homes, and house numbers on the homes. E. Street shall have an approved water supply, specifically an approved fire hydrant at a maximum 400' spacing. F. CC & R's or equivalent covenant agreement approved by the City Attorney concerning proper maintenance of the street, signed by all property owners. G. Process vacation of the existing 30' right-of-way dedication. The property owner applicants have met all of the requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Marshall, with the exception of the last two items. Our City Attorney's office has reviewed a draft of their CC & R's, which are currently being revised. The approved CC & R's will be recorded with reciprocal ingress and egress access rights for all four properties taking access. The existing 30' right-of-way offer of dedication, will be vacated by resolution concurrently when Cherry Lane is designated as a private street. Respectively submitted, r Wil~ar~ J. O~Neil City'Engineer W JO:DJ:sc Attachments 7/ RESOLUTION NO. ~)3- ~)q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) MONTHS TIME EXTENSION TO DESIGNATE CHERRY LANE A PRIVATE STREET, FOR COMPLIANCE OF THE CONDITIONS PER CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 02-215, DATED JULY 17, 2002. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga grants an additional four (4) months time extension to the property owners on Cherry Lane to comply with the conditions per City Council Resolution No. 02-215. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has decided that certain residential streets, being unique in nature, function as private residential streets; and WHEREAS, the City Council has decided that properties abutting private streets should be exempted from certain requirements normally attributable to public streets; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 58-C creating and establishing the authority to designate certain streets as private residential streets; and WHEREAS, the city Council finds the following Conditions of Approval to be in place within an additional four (4) month period, for implementation of Cherry Lane as a private street: 1. Access width to be a minimum of 26' with no parking on either side, 36' with parking on one side, or 46' with parking on both sides. 2. Access height shall be a minimum of 14'6", clear of all obstructions, including tree limbs, brush, etc. 3. Surface shall be an approved all-weather treatment, such as pavement, concrete, 'or other approved material. 4. The street shall have address identification, e.g. street sign, address directory for the homes, and house numbers on the homes. 5. Street shall have an approved water supply, specifically an approved fire hydrant at a maximum 400' spacing. 6. CC & R's or equivalent covenant agreement, approved by the City attorney, concerning proper maintenance of the street, signed by all property owners. RESOLUTION NO. CHERRY LANE STREET DESIGNATION January 15,2003 Page 2 7. Process vacation of the existing 30' right-of-way dedication (Exhibit "D"). WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. Cherry Lane, situated from Carnelian Street to the westerly terminus of Cherry Lane .(approximately 660') meets all of the requirements set forth in chapter 12.08.055 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. B. The designation of Cherry Lane as a Private Residential Street will not adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of those persons and properties adjacent to, and the vicinity of, such street. C. That a Private Residential Street designation for Cherry Lane is in conformity with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the' above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Said portion of Cherry Lane located from Carnelian Street to the westerly terminus of Cherry Lane shall be designated as a private street upon satisfying the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. SECTION 3: Said Conditions of Approval shall be satisfied within by May 17, 2003 or all rights to private street designation shall become void. SECTION 4: With the designation of that portion of Cherry Lane as a private st~'eet, it shall join the list of so designated private streets set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5: The abutting properties will be exempted from requirements set forth from the provisions of Chapter 12.08 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. EXHIBIT "A" DESIGNATED PRIVATE STREETS Name of Street Portion of Street 1. Strang Lane Carnelian Street to 1300 Private Street designation adopted feet east. based on 60% representation of petitioning property owners and 100% favorable representation at Public Hearing. 2. Bella Vista Road Sapphire Street to 1325 Private Street designation adopted feet east; Carnelian Street based on 70% representation of to 1320.5 feet west petitioning property owners and 100% favorable representation at Public Hearing. 3. Scott Lane Palo Alto to 630 feet north Private Street designation adopted based on 83% representation. 4. Mai Street Almond Street to approx. Private Street designation adopted 385 feet north based on 100% representation of petitioning property owners. Specific conditions have to be met in order for the declaration of private street becoming effective in accordance with Resolution No. 90-452. ...................... ~,.,,×. Not adopted. Non-Compliance 385 fcct nc,th 6. Cherry Lane Cherry Lane to 660 feet Private Street designation adopted west of Carnelian based on 100% representation of petitioning property owners. Specific conditions have to be met in order for the declaration of private street becoming effective in accordance with Resolution No. 2002-215 7+' APPLICAtiON FOR PRIVATE STREET DESIGNATION REASONS, USE, APPUCANTS CHERRY LANE Cherry Lane is o small country lone 650 feet long, east off Cornelian Street just above Hillside Rood. Evergreen trees, almost 40 years old, along with large flowering Oleonclers frame both sides of the first 2,56 feet of the ! 5-foot wide lane forming what is known by residents os "the tunnel". The next 135 feet has large natural evergreen Jojobo plants on the south side and landscaping on the north. None of these trees or shrubs require watering, except by Mother Nature. The lone is on o common 35-foot easement on the south of each of the Chem/Lane properties. The electric, water and phone companies each have specific access within the easement area. There is a four foot by eight inch solid poured storm water retention wall that runs 5 feet north of the south property lines, the entire east/west length of the Chem/Lane properties, to channel storm water east to Carnelian and west to a storm drain to prevent flooding of the homes below; At the west end of the . wall next to the SW corner of the west lot is a fenced thrcc-foot pipe drain, . · which emPties into the flood channel at the back of the west Topaz ' .-. development. .... Three acres of undeveloped land lies north of the Cherry Lane properties. It consists of four parcels: One is135 feet wide and three are 90 feet wide, all are 3;30 feet deep and all face Vicara Street. Thus Chem/Lane residents are enclosed on properties with only one way in and out. APPUCANTS Four families own properly on Cherry Lane. One faces Carnelian and has an access gate fo the property opening onto Cherry Lane. I. The Lester Noreen family are 40-year residents who originally purchased the 5 acres, keeping 2 acres for thernselves and spliffing the rest into 3 one-acre parcels. Mr. Noreen's Record of Survey is dated July, ]959. He graded the road and brought the water down from Almond Street al the top of Carnelian. On his two acres, Mr. Noreen built a two story home facing Carnelian, landscaped around it and built pens for a cow and goats; a bird aviary and orchard, and planted a variety of beautiful trees. ^ park-like atmosphere was created. He also planted the trees and oleanders on Cherry Lane. The present owner is his son, Bruce Noreen with his wife and children. Three properties face Cherty Lane. Two have a circular driveway. 1. The Masters family, 40-year residents, built at the same time as the Noreen's on the east and the Schriber's to the west. They built a one-story, 2000 square foot home with an orchard, garden, ball field, landscaping and flowers along with a variety of flees, now very mature. They also planted lhe Jojoba shrubs along Cherry Lane. 2. The Kniesley family are 11-year residents. They purchased the Schriber property then improved the o~chord and landscaping. : Here too, are many mature trees. ~:. 3. :Steve Harrison & Lad Wharton have'recently, purchased the last one-acre parcel, on the west, having found the perfect site to build their home. They are presently going through the necessary steps to b~gin construction. REASONS This is a flue neighborhood of fdends; one of the most valuable assets for family living. Over the years the neighbors have become ~ends and have watched out for the general safety and welfare of each other. In August of 2000, there was a neighborhood meeting to discuss what to do with the "community properly" Cheffy Lane. All were in favor of privatizotion, but the project was put on hold at that time. Now, almost two years later the project is ready to begin and the neighbors are still in agreement regarding their views on the matter. Cheny Lane is... · A quiet country lane with no traffic, safe for children and animals. · A street where anyone coming in is going to one of our homes, and their coming and going is noticed. · An open space, with room to breathe. · A bird watchers paradise and animal lovers delight with birds and wildlife in o great variety and abundance. A special delight to all is the wild bunnies that occasionally stop your car while deciding whether to dig in or run. · A place where artistic: creations made from "found" materials and antique objects of interest are positioned along the road and in the yards of the Noreen's and Masters, creating unique points of interest for visitors and residents alike. CONCLUSION We hove joined together to form on ogreement thor eoch of us will contribute our shore in the mointenonoe oncl preservotion of Cherry Lone. We would like to hove our rood left os close os possible to the woy it is now, ond  ie CHE(~,-~LANE a Private Street. Jg~nna Nore~ ' .... ' ' Bruce Noreen Loreen Masters ~,~'~"Z- ) Debra Kniesley I~u/fh Kniesley' ~'/ - C~ Philip I~nil~' ~ ~- Page 3 nf 3 C. ~d an,que and In ~nts We h~e J~ t~ to We ~ ~ to ~ve ~r ~ ~ff al~ ~ ~b~ to ~e ~ it Is ~w, ..~ THE CITY OF l~AN C H 0 C ti C A I~l 0 N GA Staff Report DATE: January 1fi, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE EXCESS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SOUTH OF SAN MARINO AVENUE AND EXTENDING SOUTH OF THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, V-189 -APN: 229-263-68 AND 229-321-21 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution summarily ordering the vacation of excess right-of-way for a portion of Charles Smith Avenue (formerly Rochester and formerly Orange) and authorizing the City Clerk to present a certified copy of this resolution and exhibits to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pamel Map No. 15012, located on the north side of Fourth Street between Buffalo Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway in the General Industrial District (subareas 12 and 13) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 1997, for the division of 62 acres into four pamels and for the street vacation (V-146) of a portion of Charles Smith Avenue. The street vacation limit for V-146 was set as the north line of lot 45 and the east boundary of Parcel Map 15012, generally, west and south of this proposed vacation V-189. DRC2001-00718 is an application now being processed for the development of a 454,087 square foot industrial building on Parcel 3 of the above-referenced Parcel Map" 15012 (25.41 acres) - APN: 209-263-68. An improvement certificate on this parcel map required that an east-west connector street be constructed with the development of Parcel 3. The applicant, OItman's investment Company, applied for a Development CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT V-189 January 15, 2003 Page 2 Code Amendment, DRC2002-00321, in order to eliminate the requirement of the east- west connector street (Mission Park Drive) through their proposed project. On July 10, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended approval for the elimination of the connector street (Planning Commission Resolution No. 02-65) and forwarded the application to the City Council for approval and final action. On August 21, 2002, the City Council concurred with the Planning Commission and voted to approve City Council Resolution No. 02-236 and heard Ordinance No. 684. On September 4, 2002, City Council heard the second reading of Ordinance 684 and thereafter approved DRC2002-00321. The current vacation, V-189, will vacate the balance of the excess street right-of-way remaining along Charles Smith Avenue located generally north of lot 45 and east of Parcel Map 15012 boundary line. The Streets and Highways Code Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8334 (a) allows for an easement to be summarily vacated for any excess right-of-way of a street or highway not required for street or highway purposes. Easements will be reserved for all existing utilities, including public storm drain in Charles Smith Avenue, or abandoned as directed by the affected utility company. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:MNB:sc Attachments: Vicinity Map Vacation Map Summary Resolution Vacation Exhibits "A", "B", "C" & "D" ?$ VICINITY MAP DRC2001-00718 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCA_t~ONGA RESOLUTION NO. O 3- 0~) ;~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SOUTH OF SAN MARINO AVENUE AND EXTENDING SOUTH OF THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8334(a), of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the excess street right-of-way along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of San Marino Avenue and extending south of the cul-de-sac terminus of Charles Smith Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess right-of-way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been used for more than five (5) consecutive years and no public money was expended for maintenance of same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating excess right-of-way along the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, south of San Marino Avenue and extending south of the cul-de-sac terminus of Charles Smith Avenue, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" and reserves easements as described in Exhibit "C" and shown on Exhibit "D". SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. EXHIBIT "A" Sheet 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE FOR STREET VACATION (V-189) PARCEL 1 Being a portion of Charles Smith Avenue (formerly Rochester Avenue, formerly Orange Avenue), in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as shown on Map of Rochester, per map recorded in Book 9 of maps, at page 20, in the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the northerly line of Lot 88 of said Map of Rochester and the westerly tine of the east 60.00 feet of Charles Smith (Orange) (Rochester) Avenue, vacated by Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of said County, a certified copy of which was recorded December 18, 1936, in Book 1177, Page 320 of Official Records of said County; thence along said west line, South 00°10'55" West, 585.02 feet; thence course "A", South 89049'05" East, 14.00 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 14.00 feet easterly of said west line, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along said parallel line, South 00°10'55" West, 459.49 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave westerly, having a radius'of 1144.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 08058'22'' an arc length of 179.16 feet to a point on said west line; thence along said west line, South 00°10'55'' West, 408.91 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of State Route 15 as shown on State of California Department of Transportation Monumentation Map No. 403593; thence along said northwesterly line, South 27°01'51" West, 66.42 feet to a point on the southerly projection of the eastedy line of Parcel 3, of Parcel Map No. 15012, per map recorded in Parcel Map Book 183 Pages 4 through 9, inclusive, in said office of the County Recorder; thence along said projection and said easterly line, North 00°10'55" East, 563.31 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 56.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears South 24004'04'' East, said point being on the Cul-de-sac at the southerly end of said Chades Smith Avenue as shown on said Parcel Map No. 15012; thence northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 65°45'01" an arc length of 64.26 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 33.00 feet eastedy of the centedine of said Charles Smith Avenue (66.00 feet wide); thence along said parallel line North 00010'55'' East, 491.72 feet to a point on said course "A"; thence along course "A", South 89°49'05" East, 11.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. The land herein described contains approximately 0.53 acres. PARCEL 2 Being a portion of Charles Smith Avenue (formerly Rochester Avenue), in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as shown on Parcel Map No. 11222, per map recorded in Parcel Map Book 129, pages 57 through 60, inclusive, in the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the northerly line of Lot 45, Map of Rochester, per map recorded in Book 9 of maps, at page 20, in said office of the County Recorder, with the westerly right-of-way of said Charles Smith Avenue (88 feet wide) as shown on Record of Survey, recorded in Book 44, page 4 of Records of Survey of said County, said right-of-way being an arc of a curve concave westerly, having a radius of 1056.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears South 74°34'32" East; thence northerly along said curve and said right-of- EXHIBIT "A" Sheet 2 of 2 way through a central angle of 10045'00'' an arc length of 198.13 feet to a point on a non- tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 56.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears South 25°50'10" West, said point being on the Cul-de-sac at the southerly end of said Charles Smith Avenue as shown on Parcel Map No. 15012, per map recorded in Parcel Map Book 183, pages 4 through 9, inclusive, in said office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 49°54'14" an arc length of 48.78 feet to a point on the eastedy line of Parcel 3, of said Parcel Map No. 15012; thence South 00°10'55" West, 193.44 feet along said easterly line to a point on said northerly line of Lot 45; thence South 89°33'00" West, 81.15 feet along said northerly line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The land herein described contains approximately 0.27 acres. See Exhibit "B" for a plat depicting the above described parcels. Th is/ok to r~/~e~ y~d~/ ~ Expires 09/30/05 J.N. 98-04a  P.O.C. ~.----N'LY LINE LOT 88 EXHJBrr ~ ,33'~ - m SHEET 1 OF ~ ~STERLY LINE OF ~E EAST < ~1 ~ 60.00 FEET OF CHARLES SMI~ i ~. ~l ~ /(ROCHESTERXORANGE) A~NUE ~ ~ ~3' ~VACA~D PER BOOK H77, ~ SAN MARINO~ ~ _~ oD ~ , ....... ~- -- I ~' SEE ~ ~ ~CHARLES SMITH I~ ~ ~ / ~ FORMERLY i I m J > (~GE)(ROCHESTER) . : ~ -< ~ ~ ~<~ ' ~ ~ ~ L:179.16 ~ ~ NORTHERLY / '-~ - / , S8519 3 FOR ,,'/ - LEGAL DESCRIPTION YREVlSIONS ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH =. ~. ~ s~..T AVENUE STREET VACATION (V-189) ~(9~) 9~1982 ' F~:(909) 941-0891 OCTOBER 2002 EXHIBIT "C" Sheet I of 1 RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE VACATION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE (V-189) The Vacation of the Street described in Exhibit "A" of Charles Smith Avenue Vacation (V- 189) pertains only to the use of said described land for Street purposes. All Storm Drain and Utility uses are retained and excepted that exist in place or by License, Easement or Deed of Record on this date of recording hereto, except that portion lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the centerline intersection of San Marfno Avenue (66.00 feet wide) and Charles Smith Avenue (66.00 feet wide) as shown on Parcel Map No. 15012, per map recorded in Parcel Map Book 183 Pages 4 through 9, inclusive, in the office of the County Recorder; thence South 89049'05" East, 33.00 to a point on the easterly line of said Charles Smith Avenue; thence South 00°10'55" West, 600.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave westerly, having a radius of 56.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 17o24'00" an arc length of 17.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°49'05" East, 133.07 feet to the POINT OF TERMINUS. See Exhibit "D" for a plat depicting the above described line. <':~n"Ir~iors~(i, ~-~/~. 4430 · me Expires 09/30/05 J.N. 98-04a , [_~ .._ L ,~.-.--N'LY LINE LOT 88 EXHIBrF 'D' ~ 33'~ _ ,~ SHEET 1 OF 1 SAN MARINO~ ~CHARLES SMITH~ , d ~=17'24'00" AVENUE I ~ R=S6.00' FO~ERLYJ L= 17.01' (O~GE~ROCHESTER) ' ~ m~ g J~ L2 , . / I ~ ~ S89'49 05 E , ' NW'LY L NE ~- / SEE EXHIBIT "C" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVISIONS ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. NORTHERLY LINE OF ~,, ,. ~E~ s~.~ RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS ONT~O, CALIFORNIA 91764 ~(9o~) ~8o-~982 * FAX:(909) 9~1-0891 NO~MBER 2002 ~ ~ CITY DATE: Januanj 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Mc,-nbem of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debm Meier, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 SUBTT15724 - KB HOME - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 lot for the development of 78 single family detached condominiums and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.03 acres of lend, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Term Vista Community Plen, located on the south side of Terra Vista Padweay between ,'.',~en Avenue and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077-831-32. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEVV DRC2001- 00381 - KB HOME - The review of detailed si~e plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract MAP SUBTT15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings on 9.05 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Term Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between J~4i!likell Avenue ap.d Spruce Avellu~. APN 1077-831-32. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously recommends adoption of a Miti9ated Negative Declaration of environmental impects and approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT15724 and Development Review DRC2001-00381 by adol~on of the Resolutions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tl~e proposed project density is 8.6 dwetfing unfls per ace. The project is lc~,~ted within t~e Low-Med~m Res~lential District (4-8 dwe;~in~ un~ta per acre); therefore the proposed development is actually within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Term Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan ('Flexibifity in Density and Land Use' page Vi-6 of t~e Terra Vista Community Pien). CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUB'I-I'15724/DRC2001-O0381 - KB HOME January 15, 2003 Page 2 The Terra Vista Community Plan provides flexibility to modify elements of the plan over time without altedng the basic concept of the community. Any residential parcel within the planned community may be re-designated either one-step up or down in the density range (i.e LM land use may be re-designated to M; M land uses may be re-designated to either LM or MH, etc.) as long as such changes do not alter the intent of the plan to maintain desirable relationships between vadous land uses and to provide a vadety of residential housing types throughout the community. Modifications of this nature are allowed subject to review and approval Of the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission and the City Council. ANALYSIS.' The attached Planning Commission staff report provides a detailed analysis Of the proposed project. This is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of Terra Vista. Existing development adjacent to the west side of the site includes Coyote Canyon Park and the Mountain View Apartments at a density of 18.9 dwelling units per acre, and on the east side is single-family homes on 3,500 square foot minimum lots at an overall project density Of 7.2 dwelling units per acre. Therafora the proposed project at 8.6 dwelling units per acre provides an appropriate transition between the small-lot single-family homes and the apartment neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment included the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mitigation is included in the attached Resolution of Approval to address impacts to soils erosion, air quality (dust suppression), and short-term construction noise. Brad Buller City Planner BB:DM/Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff report dated December 11, 2002 Exhibit "B" - Draft Planning Commission minutes dated December 11, 2002 Draft Resolution for Tentative Tract SUBTT15724 Draft Resolution for Development Review DRC2001-00381 THE CITY OF l~Aiq C H 0 CIICAMONGA DATE: December 11,2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15724 - KB HOME - A proposed Tentative Tract Map C~)r~sisting of I lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress on 9.05 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME - The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings on 9,05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acta, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. PROJECT UPDATE: On October 23, 2002, the Commission considered and recommended approval of a Terra Vista Community Plan Land Use Amendment for this parcel. As a result of comments received by staff, and public testimony received by the Commission at that meeting that potentially pertain to the development of Tentative Tract 15724, the applicant requested a continuance from the Planning Commission meeting of November 13, 2002 in order to respond to concerns regarding traffic, circulation, and pedestrian safety along Mountain View Drive, as well as respond to questions regarding the change in view shed as a result of changing the land use from Elementary School to Residential. The applicant has since completed a focused Traffic Study of the circulation along this segment of Mountain View Drive and has scheduled a neighborhood meeting on December 10, 2002 to describe the project in detail to local residents. Because the neighborhood meeting is set to occur following the production of this report and the agenda, staff's comments regarding the neighborhood meeting will be presented orally at the Planning Commission meeting for the Commissioners' consideration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT15724 AND DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: The proposed project density is 8.6 dwelling units per acre. The project is located within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the proposed development is within' the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The standards of the Medium Density District shall apply. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning - Terra Vista CommuniW Plan: North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West Park and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acta) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West Park and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-1'15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential development referred to as "Calais" (Tract 12671 - Low-Medium) and an attached residential townhome development referred to as "Seville" (Tract 15725 - Low-Medium) along the east boundary; a single- family subdivision referred to as "Oxford" (Tract 12802 - Low-Medium) on the south side of Mountain View Drive; Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (Medium- High) along the west boundary; and on the north side of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style single-family residential development referred to as "Villa Capri" (Tract 13192 - Low-Medium). The north and south boundaries of the site are formed by Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive respectively, that include curb and gutter. The site slopes gently from north to south at a 2 pement gradient. There are no trees or significant vegetation left on the site because of years of disking and weed control. E. Parkinq Calculations: Required Parking: Three (or more) bedroom units: 78 X 2.00 spaces/unit = 156 Guest parking: 78 X 0.25 spaces/unit = 20 Total parking required: 176 (156 within garages) Parking Provided: Total number of spaces provided: 231 (including 156 within garages) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUB'lq'15724 AND DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME December 11,2002 Page 3 ANALYSIS: A. General: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The site was originally intended to be an Elementary School site, and the land use was recently changed from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Residential (Low-Medium). (Related file: Terra Vista Community Plan DRC2002-00533). Site Plan: The site is designed with one access point from Terra Vista Parkway on the north, and one from Mountain View Drive on the south. All of the internal circulation is provided by private driveways. A pedestrian pathway meanders through the entire project, providing access to all on-site amenities, guest-parking spaces, and the adjacent park and trail system of Terra Vista. Amenities: The proposed project of 78 condominium dwelling units must provide a total of five amenities throughout the project for the recreation and enjoyment of the residents. The proposed project includes the following amenities, including the points staff has assigned to each amenity: Amenity Points Tot lot 1 Open turf play 1 Picnic area/BBQ amenities 1 Seating nodes 1 Meandering pathways 1 TOTAL 5 Buildinq Types: The project includes four building types. Units range in size from 1,488 square feet to over 2,000 square feet. All building types are two-story in nature and designed using the "zero lot-line" concept, where all usable side yard space is collected on one side of the dwelling to maximize useable space. This is the same product that is now under-construction on Tract Map SUBTT16264 (south side of Mountain View east of Milliken Avenue). B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Mannerino and Coleman) reviewed the project on October 15, 2002 (Exhibit "H"). The Committee reviewed the design along Terra Vista Parkway, which is intended to match the wall and landscape pattern of the existing streetscape due to the level of activity along the parkway. The frontage on Mountain View Drive will be similar to Tract Map SUBq-I'16264, which is under construction further east. Staff also identified that although a concentration of visitor parking occurred in the north end of the project, access to a large number of units is PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT15724 AND DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME December 11,2002 Page 4 provided by access to the on-site walkway, and that guest parking exceeds the Code requirement by more than 50 spaces. The Committee recommended approval of the project without any further revisions. C. Technical and Gredinq Review Committees: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project October 16, 2002. All requirements of the Committee are included as Conditions of Approval and are included in subsequent plan revisions. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the project at its regularly scheduled meeting on October 15, 2002. D. Nei.qhborhood Meetin,q: The Neighborhood meeting was held the week of December 5, 2002, and a verbal summary will be provided during the staff report at the public hearing. E. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study was prepared for the project. Mitigation is included in the attached Resolution of Approval to address impacts to water (storm water pollution prevention measures), air quality (dust suppression), and noise (short term construction noise). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolutions recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 and Development Review DRC2001-00381 to the City Council and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Brad Buller City Planner BB:DM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "H" - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated October 15, 2002 Exhibit "1" Initial Study Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 to the City Council Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Review DRC2001-00381 to the City Council FOR co~'qDOll, l],ll-~d PURPOSES ~NTA~ T~CT N0. 15724 m~~~ " '--" ____, J:\652-1327~tentmao~S Umao.clw~, 10/2412002 08:03:26 AM. BI J;\652-1327~tentmeo~DetSIlePlen.dwo, 10/24/2002 07:56:31 AM. BL PLANT PALEITE: WALL LEGEND: · 15724 " - - TERRA VISTA COlvllV~l~, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. \ ~d. J:~652-1327~tenlmaD\GrndlnaPlnn.dwa. 10124/2002 07:58:34 AM. BL ~" ~'~' ~,~,~ __~ .............. ~ ~t ~ __ TF.~ A VI S TA III HOME DATE: Jun~ 1, 2001 G~-~T~ L.A. DIVISION LEFT ELEVATION "C" RIEAI~ ELEVATION "C" P. IGHT ELEVATION "C" TI~JRR A VISTA III Ol~ F. ATER B.A. DIVISION LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION "A" I~IGHT ELEVATION "A" HOME DATE: J~ 1, 2001 O~.ATER L.A. DIVISION ENHANCED Ei~ri-iA~iC ED RIGHT ELEVATION "A' ELEVATION T F.I-~-R~5 VI S TA III ,-_^~,: 222.,66o KI:t HOME r,.~-~: ~,~,~,, ~. 2oo~ OI~F. ATER L.A. DIVISION ELEVATION "A" ~ OI~ATER L.A:I DIVISION T]~-Pd~ A VISTA III PLAN: 225.1828 PRO~ECT: 2200~5 LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION "C" RIGHT ELEVATION "C" TI~'-I::~_I~ A VI S WA III KB HOME DAT~: Sula. 1, 2001 G~F-ATER L.A. DIVISION TI~-Pd~A VISTA III " GREATER L.A~' DIVISION LEFT ELEVATION "B" RIGHT ELEyATION "B" ~ TF.i~lZ~Z~ VI S TA III TF, R R~k VI S TA III GI~F. ATER L.A. DIVISION SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN HOME D~T~: J~n~ 1, 2001' F-ATER L.A. DIVISION SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOi~ PLAN  TF. Pd~ A VISTA III ' ~ ' '~'~-'-~'~ - PLAN: 222.1660 Ol~F. ATER L.A. DIVISION SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN TF.I~i~ A VI S TA III ~ KB HOME DATE: June 1. 200l GREATER L_A ~ DIVISION · SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIll. ST FLOOR PLAN HOME DATE; June 1,2001 GRF-ATER B.A. DIVISION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1{5'/24 J:\652-132'Atentmao\Tmct Ma o. dw(t. 10124/2002 08:01:28 AM. BL DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 p.m. Debra Meier October 15, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 SUBTT15724- KB HOME - A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and I lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acta) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME - The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724, consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acta) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acta, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. Design Parameters: Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-tamily residential referred to as "Calais' (Tract 12671-Low-Medium) and an attached residential townhome development referred to as "Seville" (Tract 15725 - Low-Medium).along the east boundary; a single-family subdivision referred to as "Oxford" (Tract 12802 - Low-Medium) on the south side of Mountain View Drive; Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (Medium High) along the west boundary; and on the north side of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style single-family residential development referred to as "Villa Capd" (Tract 13192 - Low-Medium). The north and south boundaries of the site are formed by Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive respectively, that include curb and gutter. The site slopes gently from north to south at a 2 pement gradient. There ara no trees or significant vegetation left on the site due to years of disking and weed control. The property has a General Plan designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and a Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment will be considered by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2002, to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Density residential. The proposed project is proposed at an actual density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, which is in the range of Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. The standards of the Medium Density Residential Distdct will apply. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: ARCHITECTURE Tentative Tract 15724 will feature the same zero-lot line product that is currently being built in Tract 16264, on Mountain View Drive east of Milliken. Staff has not suggested in modifications or revisions to the product, although the Committee is welcome to drive by the existing model complex on Tract 18284 and make any comments or recommendations. DRC COMMENTS 'lq' 15724/SUB'I-r15724 & DRC2002-00381 -KB HOME October 15, 2002 Page 2 SITE PLAN 1. The Mountain View Drive street scene will be similar to that of Tract 16264, with a row of units facing the street creating a very traditional street scene of quaint homes with front porches elements. The Terra Vista Parkway street scene, however, will feature the streetscape wall and landscaping similar to all other developments along the Parkway. The applicant chose this approach due to the greater degree of traffic along the parkway, making it less conducive to having the front porch accessible to the street. 2, Although guest parking is fairly well distributed throughout the site, the spaces in the northern portion of the site are concentrated along the northern-most aisle. The spaces would be generally accessible to the residents of the northern portion of the site through use of the open space trail connection. This layout is a direct result of trying to avoid placing the front doors/porches along Terra Vista Parkway (as commented above). Staff is of the opinion that the trail/walkway access provides adequate access to residents in the north portion of the site, however, as always we are open to Committee input, AMENITIES Five amenities are required for the project consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings. The following amenities are proposed: 1) picnic area with BBQ facilities; 2) tot lot; 3) large open turf area (minimum dimension required of 50-feet- 75-feet provided); 4) meandering pathways through the site with access to adjacent Terra Vista trail system and Coyote Canyon Park; and, 5) a variety of seating nodes within the common open space areas. The use of brick pilasters, arbor gateways, seating nodes and other site amenity details will be the same as those used in Tract 16264, Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project in light of the comments provided and recommend review and approval by the Planning Commission. Desi.qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: John Mannerino, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Debra Meier The Committee approved the project without further modification and recommended it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action, '~ I~NVIRO'NMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ~.~c~.~,, (Part I - Initial Study) (909) 4~-2750 ~e of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in fu . ~ ~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure ~t the application is complete at the time of submittal; City oiaff will not be available lo'per[otto work required to pro~dde rreissing infon~ation. Application Number for the project to which this forrn perlains: _ .Tentative.Tract No. 15724 Project Tille: ~ ~ Name&Addmssofprojectowner(s): KB HOME Greater 'Los An~]eles Inc. ~rate Center ~mona ,CA 91768-~641 __ · Name & Address ofdeveloperorproject sponsor:. Same as above ContactPer~on &Address: Mr. Jary Cockroft TelephoneNumbec_ (909) 802-1133 Name & Address of per, on prepatfng this form (if different from above): INITSTD1 .WPD - 4/96 ' Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non.constmcE°n CUPs unless othem4$e requested bi staff, '1) provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundarfes. ' - · 2) provide a set of color photographs which show representaEve views into_ the site from the north, south, east and west; views intq and from. the site from the p~fma~y acceSS points which serve the site; and representative vieWs of significant features ~ the site. Include a map showing location of eec. h photograph. 3) project Location (describe): Located on Terra Vista Parkwa east of Co ote Can on. Park. · ~ 4) Assesso~s Parcel Nurnbera (attach additionsi sheet if necessary): APN 1077-831-22 °5) Gros$ Site Area (a~'/sq' ft'): 9.05 acres ~ °6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 9.05 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: N/A ~ I Include a descdptioh of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmenra 8) agencies in order to fully implement the projecL' 1) Tentative Tract Map approval 2) Design revie_.._~w approval ~ ~ermits 4) Buildin Permits ~ --- -- Page INITSTD1 .VVPD - 4/96' Descdbe the physical seffing of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants (including age and condition) and the use of tne strucr · P ' site all sources o fin formation (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheological surveys, traffic studies): This site made of over 9 acres is bounded on one side by an improved roadway. ~gentle 2[ slope of the land from north to south without any significant changes i_n grade. The soil i.s made up. of. coarse sand, gravel and cobbles. The .site is covered with scrub vegetation and ~ative g.rasses and does not have any trees within_its boundary. 10) Descdbe the known cultural and/or histodc~l aspects °f the site' Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): No know cultural or historical elements have occurred on this site. .- 11) Descdbe any noise sources and their levels that noW. affect the ~ile (aircraft. roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Measurable levels of roadway noise are present along existing perimeter roadways. Construction of sound attenuating perimeter block walls will mitigate the'affect of existing roadway noise to adjacent homes built with this project. ~ '--~- 12.3 12) Descdbe the proposed pmject in detail. This should pmvide an adequate descdption of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the prosed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the exten't of dev. elopment to occur wflh each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessa~: The project consists of 78 singt~ family residential units. Internal local drives will be twenty-six feet wide with off~street parking. Th'e local drives will~ provide access at two locations td Terra Vista Parkway. 13) Desc/fbethesurroundingpmperties~inc~udinginf~rmati~n~np~antsandanima~sandanycu~tur~~~hist~dca~~~rscenicaspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commen:ial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-fatuity, apa~ment houses, shops, department atores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): The project is bounded on the north by a fully' improved public street. To th_~e north, south and east are developed residential tracts with densities ranging fromS.7to 9 DU/acre. To the west is Coyote Canyon Park, a fully developed 4.52 acre park and Montecito Apartments, a 2 story apartment 'proje'cl~ at 19.1 DU/acre. ~ tracts meet~the Terra Vista C____on~nunity Plan~'.standards for heights, setbacks, etc. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding gene~l area of the project? NOo 15) ~ndicatethetype~fsh~rt~termand~~ng-termn~iset~begenerated~inc~udings~urceandam~unt~ Howwillthesenoiselevels affect adjacent propetties and on-site uses, What rnetbods of $oun. d proofing are proposed? . . '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacernents of mature or scenic tme= Trees of this nature do not exist on this property. ~dicateanybo~esofwa~r(indudingdomesticwalersupp~ ~wh~hthe$itedm~s: This site drains into City of Rancho Cucamonga Master Planned Storm Drain Facilities. 18) Indicate expected arnount of waler usage. (See Attachrnent A for usage estimates). For furlher clad§cation, please contact the Cucarnonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal~day) 600 (Jal/day Peak use (gal/Day) [200 9al/day Peak use (gal/rnin/ac) b. Commercial/ind. (gal/day~ac) -- 19) Indicate proposed rnethod of sewage disposal. Septic Tank Z Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage gene~tion: (See ,Attachrnent A for usage estimates). Forfurther cladficalion, please contact the Cucamonga county Water Distdct at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal~day) 270 gal/day .- b. Comrnercial/Ind. (gal~day~ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Nurnberofresidentialunit$: ., Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximurn lot size: 78. singl.e family units on one Comdominium Plan INITSTD1.VVPO - 4/96 ' /,~5 Page5 A#ached (indicate whether units am rental or for ~ale units): __ 21) Anitcipatedrangeofsalep#cesand/ormnt~ Sale P~ce($) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ " 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit ~/pe: Plan 1-:*~- 3 bedroom Plan 2 - 3 bedroom~ ~ Plan 3 - 3 bedroom with optional loft/bedroom 4~ Plan 4 4 bedroom with optional loft/bedroom - ~ 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Plans 1-3: 4-6 person household Plan~4: 5-7 person household 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who ~11 be residing within the project: Conta~ the appropriate School Dis~cts as shown in Attachment B: a. Eiementaryi 78 X 0.66 = 51.48' (K-5) 78 x 0.21 = 16.38 b. Junior High: * ~6-8). h 78 x 0.20 = 15.60 c. ~nior Hig __ CDMMERCIAL~ INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS.. 25) De$cdbetype~fuse($)andmaj~rfuncti~n($)~fc~mmercia~~industtfa~~rinstttuti~na~ases: 26) Totalfloorareaofc°mmeroial'indus~al'°rinStituti°naluSesbytype: INITSTD1.WPD - 4/96 ' /Z~:~ Page6 27) indicate hours of operatio, n:__ 28) Number of employees: Torah Maximum Shift: __ 77me of Maximum Shift:_ 29) Pmvide breakd~wn ~f anticipatedj~b c~a$si~cati~ns~ inc~uding wage and sa~a~y ~anges' as we~ as an indicati~n ~f the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workel~ to be hired that currently reside in the City:_ -- '3 I) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distrfct, .at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, tim, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. 17.7 Page7 33) In thekn~wn hist~q/ ~f this pmperb/~ has there been any use~ st~rage~ ~r discharge ~f hazard~q~ and/~rtoxic mateda~? Examples of hazanYOUS and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solventS, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground stomge 'of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use. storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, ff known. 34) J4411 the proposed project involve the temporel7 or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic, materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an invento~ of all such matetfals to be used and proposed method of disposaL The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shqwn and labeled on the application plans. NO. ~ ~ I hereby certify that the stalements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of lhis project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are tree and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further under~tand that additional information may be required to be subrnitied before an'adequate evaluation can be made by the City~'~'~~/ °ate** Ju~ 3, 200~ _ signature: /,~/~-~.~/~ ' * · '-' ' Title: ve Vice, Pt-esidenl;~ L,and. City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 2. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 (SUBTI'15724) - KB HOME - A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077-831-32. Related File DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME - The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724, consisting of 76 single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential Density (4-8 dwelling units per acta) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIs OPERATING CORP. - A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to 1) realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor, to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street; and 2) Change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Density (LM) Residential for a 9.05-acre parcel located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related Files: 1) SUBTI'16157 and 2) SUBTT15724. 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: KB HOME GreateSt Los Angeles, Inc. 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201 Pomona, CA 91768-2641 4. General Plan Designation: Low-Medium (6-8 dwelling units per acta). 5. Zoning: Terra Vista Community Plan - Existing Elementary School - Proposed Low- Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acta) 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential referred to as "Calais" (Tract 12671-LM) and an attached residential townhome development referred to as "Seville" (Tract 15725 - LM) along the east boundary; a single-family subdivision referred to as "Oxford" (Tract 12802 - LM) on the south side of Mountain View Drive; Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (MH) along the west boundary; and on the north side Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 2 of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style single-family residential development referred to as '¥illa Capri" (Tract 13192 - LM). The north and south boundaries of the site are formed by Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive respectively, that include curb and gutter. The site slopes gently from north to south at a 2 percent gradient. There are no trees or significant yegetation left on the site due to years of disking and weed control. 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8, Contact Person and Phone Number: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. I(x) Land Use and Planning (x) Transportation/Cimulation ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Public Services II ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Utilities and Service Systems II (x) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources II (x) Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Aesthetics Il(x) Air Quality (x) Noise ( ) Cultural Resources (x) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared for SUB'I-r!5724/DRC2001-00381; and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared for the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. Debra Meier, AICP Contract Planner September 24, 2002 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Potea~elly I U~less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: a~.,=.t ~m~ ~.~=.t No rr~ac~ ncoq~ated mpac~ mpac~ 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING, Would the proposab a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (X) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (X) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (X) established community? Comments.' a-d) The 9 acre site was originally intended to be the site of Coyote Canyon Elementary School, and in fact a temporary school, comprised of completely modular structures, was one time located on the site. However, in 1999 Lewis Companies submitted an amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan (City Council Res. No. 99-121) to enlarge their parcel on Elm Avenue, creating a larger school site at this location. That Community Plan Amendment changed the land use of the parcel from Medium Density Residential to Elementary School. This action essentially combined the two separate elementary school sites in the west half of Terra Vista, to a larger site that better suits the needs of the School District. The property on Mountain View is no longer required by the Distdct as a school site. Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Land uses on either side of the site include single-family residential (Tract 12671-LM) and an attached residential townhome development (Tract 15725 - LM) along the east boundary; and, Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (MH) along the west boundary. On the north side of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style single-family residential development (Tract 13192 - LM), and on the south side of Mountain View DAve is a single-family residential neighborhood referred to. as Oxford (Tract 12802 - LM). The site has a general plan designation of Low-Medium Density residential, and a proposed Terra Vista Community Plan designation of Low-medium density residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the actual project density is 8.6 dwelling units per acre. This flexibility in density is permitted in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. The proposed project is designed in conformance with all applicable standards and guidelines of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sigaificant MiiJga§ofl SigpJficant No 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () (X) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly ( ) ( ) (X) or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () (X) housing? .Comments: a-c) Construction activities will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed subdivision will result in new residents to the area; however, the proposed density of development has been anticipated since the adoption of the Terra Vista Community Plan in 1983. The site is void of existing structures and will not impact existing housing units. The Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment approved in 1999 (Council Ordinance 99-121), enlarging the current Coyote Canyon school site on Elm Avenue, was a amendment from Medium Residential to Elementary School, therefore the is no net change in the overall density within the Community Plan based on the current Community Plan Amendment from Elementary School to Low-Medium Density Residential. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~.t Inc~peratedMitiga~ S~gnificant NO 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) (X) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) (X) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) (X) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () (X) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) (X) h) Expansive soils? ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 5 i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-c) No known earthquake faults pass through the site; it is not in an Alquist-Pdolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault passes within approximately. 1'~ miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4% miles northerly. These faults are both capable of producing Mw6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is approximately 14 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. The site is located on stable soils, which are typically not subject to liquefaction. Adherence to the Uniform Building Code will ensure the geologic impacts are less than significant on residential construction. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e-f) The site has a relatively gentle grade, so landslides or mudflows are not likely to occur and grading will be required only to create proper drainage and development of appropriate building pad areas. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga soil association. These soils are typically excessively drained, moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans. They are relatively stable, but are subject to liquefaction when the water table is shallow. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Building and Safety Division will require a soils report. The impact is not considered significant. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. I I P~.t~, I I I Irr~ct ~mt~ Ir~act Irnl~ct Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~,,=.~ ~u~,,o. s~,,=.t ,o 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ( ( ) (X) ( ) the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related (() (X) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ( ( ) (X) surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () (X) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ( ) ( ) (X) water movements? 133 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 6 f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (X) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) i) Substantial reduction in the amount o~ groundwater ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns. The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately 2 percent gradient. The City Engineer must approve a drainage study, indicating how storm water will be directed to the existing storm drains in the immediate area, prior to issuance of grading permits. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity that causes the disturbance of five acres or more. The General Construction permit requires recipients to reduce or eliminate non-storm water discharges into storm 'water systems, and to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region has issued an area-wide NPDES Storm Water Permit for the County of San Bernardino, the San Bemardino County Flood Control District, and the incorporated cities of San Bemardino County within the Santa Ana Region. The City then requires implementation of measures for a project to comply with the area-wide permit requirements. The SWPPP will include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction of the project to pollute surface waters. This is a standard condition of approval applicable to this project. BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved reads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion dudng the rainy season. The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant: 1. Prior to'issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction..BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the Building Official. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both dudng construction and operation. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant. b) The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 7 c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. f-i) The project will not alter the course or direction of groundwater, nor have any contact with groundwater which would impact groundwater quality. Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I ,wad I ,,=:.po~ I ,,~o~ I ,mm~ I 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (X) cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments.'. a-b) The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. The criteda pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM~0). Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors. Construction Emissions Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Grading 2.95 2.95 38.86 36.92 13.62 6.54 Worker Trips 0.23 0.23 0.33 0.33 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.06 Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.02 Mobile Equip. 3.46 3.29 31.00 29.45 2.30 2.19 Arch. Coatings 62.48 59.36 Asphalt 0.35 0.33 Totals 69.61 66.35 70.46 66.97 0.62 0.62 16.00 8.81 SCAQMD Thres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM10 and NOx dudng grading activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 8 conditions (operational impacts) for NOx. Table 1 shows project impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~0) will be generated. To ensure PM~0 is below a significant level the following measures shall be implemented: 2, The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent {approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3, Terra Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction, 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes, 5, Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. Operations Emissions The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tdp Generation Manual. 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the residential nature of the proposed project, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium/heavy duty diesel trucks. The project post- construction emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM~o), and since single-family homes surround the site, mitigation measures will be used to minimize the project contribution to regional emission of criteda pollutants. Table 2 Operations Emissions (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~0 Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Area Source 3.86 3.86 0.59 0.55 0.25 0.23 0.00 0.00 Mobile Source 9.60 9.19 6.79 6.44 79.40 75.25 3.77 3.57 Totals 13.46 13.05 7.38 6.99 79.65 75.48 3.77 3.57 SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 9 During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NOx and PM~0 levels in the area. Since single-family residences surround the site, the following mitigation measures will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels. 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in Table 2, post-construction activities at the site will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6~ edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle trips associated with a designated land use. The proposed project includes the construction of 78 single-family detached condominium units. Based on the number of units and residential land use, the ITE associates a trip rate of 6.76 trips per day per dwelling unit. Approximately 527 trips are associated with the project. This amount of traffic is minimal and will generate 75.25 pounds of CO emissions per day. Emissions associated with these vehicle trips are below SCAQMD thresholds (Table 2). cd) The proposed project is not of the size, scope, or nature to generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Sign~cant NO I ~mmc~ I ~.c~qx~te~ I ~mpani [ .matt I 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 10 g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-f) The proposed single-family residential subdivis!on will generate approximately 780 trips per day (an average of 10 trips per day per household). The project is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan master plan street improvements and related facilities in the immediate area. At the time of building permit issuance, the applicant is required to pay Traffic Impact Fees as established by the City Council to offset the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. g) Located over 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is northerly of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mi~gatio~ ~g~ificant No 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal'result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () (X) habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, () () (X) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? . , c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () (X) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal' () ()) (X) pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ) (X) .Comments: a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984 and annual weed and erosion control measures have been undertaken annually since that time. b-c) Although previously in vineyard cultivation, the site was graded to a "super-pad" condition in 1984 when much of Terra Vista was rough graded. There are no existing trees or structures on the site. d) There are no riparian or wetland habitat on'-site. e) The site is undeveloped. However, development in the vicinity has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002~00533 Page 11 I I~e.ga~, I I I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation I Slgn~cant No mpact nco~ted I Impact I Impact J 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) (X) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) (X) inefficient manner?. c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) · (X) resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The site is not designated by State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 AND Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant MItigaoon Significant NO 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of'accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) (X) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response ( ) ( ) (X) plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) (X) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential ( ) ( ) (X) health hazards? e)' Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) (X) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a-e) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses other than the prior vineyard cultivation. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous .wastes, or discolored soils are observed. There is no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping or refuse on-site. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si~.~t M~,~,, Si~",~,~ No 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in; a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) Comments: a-b) The proposed project will net produce any noticeable long-term noise impacts, as the site is proposed for residential subdivision, which is consistent with development in the surrounding area. Construction of the proposed project would potentially result in relatively high noise levels and annoyance at the closest residences. The following measures, as required by the Development Code, would reduce short-term construction-related noise impacts associated with the proposed project: 9. During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip ali construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 10. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. '1'1. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 12. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise level to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant IV~Uga#~l Significamt No '11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Schools? ( ) · ( ) ( ) (X) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 13 e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection - The site, located on Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway, will be served by a fire station located near Baseline Road east of Day Creek Channel or Milliken Avenue near Banyan Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approyal of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes are placed upon project approval. Police Protection - The proposed residential subdivision will incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee schedule adopted by the City Council. Schools - The proposed project is located within the Terra Vista Community, which has agreements with the affected school districts to fund school construction. Parks - The proposed project is located within the Terra Vista Community, which has a Park Implementation Agreement approved by the City Council, through which park sites are developed for the entire Community Plan area. Public Facilities - The proposed residential subdivision would incrementally increase traffic on adjacent streets, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council. Issues and Supporting information Sources: S~gnilicent ~t~aileaSign~tlcant No 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (X) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ,Comments: a-g) The proposed residential subdivision will include the construction of 78 single-family residences. The proposed development will extend as necessary existing utility into the site as a condition of development. The proposed project will not require major modification or alterations to the existing utility infrastructure in immediate area. lq/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 14 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sig~,~=ntMi~J~JooSigni§carll NO ~3. AESTHETICS. Would the proposak a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highwa~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Comments: a-b) The proposed residential subdivision is Io~ted adjacent to Te~a Vista Pa~way and Mountain View Drive and must be developed in ~nforman~ with the lands~pe and streets~pe guidelines of the Te~a Vista Communi~ Plan. The residential stru~ures have previously re~ived Ci~ of Rancho Cu~monga Design Review CommiEee approval, as the proposed dwellings are identi~l to those used in Tra~ 16264 on Mountain View Drive east of Milliken. c) The proposed project development will increase the number of streetlights and securi~ lighting used in the immediate vicini~. Due to the nature of existing residential and ~mmercial development in the area su~ounding the site, the impa~s of lighEglam will not be signifi~nt. Issues and SuppoSing Information Sour~s: ~,~,t ~,~ ~ I '~" I 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the p~posah a) Disturb paleontol~i~l msour~s? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Disturb archaeologi~l msour~s? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Affed histod~l or cultural resour~s? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) d) Have the potential to ~use a physi~l change () () () (X) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) potential impad ama? Comments: a-e) Although no cultural resources have been obse~ed during previous grading and site maintenance, additional grading on the site may expose or uneadh histodc cultural resour~s. As the site is approximately 9 acres in size and the surrounding ama has previously been developed, the likelihood of uneadhing cultural msour~s is minimal and impacts am, therefore, considered to be less than sign~nt. In the event that any such resour~s am discovered, the contmdor will be required to ~ntad the owner of the site and the San Bernardino Coun~ Museum for the proper m~ve~, removal, or documentation. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 15 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~,,~.t Miflgaf~n Signi§c~nt No 15. RECREATION. Would the proposah a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ( ) ( ) (), (X) parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) The proposed residential subdivision of 78. single-family homes will incrementally increase the use of existing parks within Terra Vista. However, a Park Implementation Agreement was adopted by the City Council, which sets standards for park development within Terra Vista. b) The proposed subdivision is located near Coyote Canyon Park, immediately adjacent to the proposed development. The proposed project will not negatively impact the use or enjoyment of any of the existing parks within Terra Vista or the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~g.~c~.~ ~,~ s~ca.t .o 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rata or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively bdef, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () () (X) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 16 d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (X) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984. At that time, the vineyard was removed and the site was graded to a "superpad" condition. Annual erosion and weed control measures have been undertaken annually since that time. There are no existing trees or structures remaining on the site. b) The project site is approximately 9 acres in size and grading will entail establishing proper drainage and residential building pads suitable for future single-family development. Although the short-term construction activities may result in dust and noise, which may be noticeable to existing residents in the immediate area, significant impacts are avoided through implementation of erosion control and dust suppression measures. c) The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan. would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required.. d) The proposed development on 9 acres would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The site is proposed as Low-Medium Density Residential parcel along Terra Vista Parkway, west of Milliken Avenue. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 17 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures'based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and ara available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (X) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR - City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (X)General Plan - City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. ~D Signature~,~ ate: PrintNant~andlltle: "J_/~/::z',L~ ~2~/~7'- /'/5 of Rancho Cucamonga City NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 and Development Review DRC2001-00381 Public Review Period Closes: January 15, 2003 Project Name: Project Applicant: KB HOME Project Location (also see attached map); Located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress and the review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 78 single-family detached condominium dwellings on 9.05 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Related File: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. FINDING. This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. January 15, 2003 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. 02-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15724, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 1 LOT FOR CONDOMINIUM pURPOSES AND 1 LOT FOR iNGRESS/EGRESS ON 9.05 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY pLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKVVAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKJNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1077-831-32. A. Recitals. HOME fi ed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT'15724, as 1. ~ ........ ,-=- ~,~--,,,~=,-,. Hereinafter in this Reso ution, the subject Tentative Tract described in tne Xl~e Map request is referred to as "the application." n November 13, and cont nued to December 11, 2002, the Planning Commission of the 2. RanOc~o Cucamonga conducted a duly not~ced pubhc heanng on the apphcetton and City of concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. · Based u on the substantial ev dence presented to this Commission during the above- 2 ., _P ., _L_.~ nndDecemberll,2002, includ ng written and oral staff referenced puDIBC nearing on r~over[.~u~ ~-~, - reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ~ .......... o-e""' located on the south side ofTerm Vista Parkway a /nea plicat on app~le~ ~u p~ .'- - P ...... .--, -.-.~ ,-,~ north side of Mountain View Drive with a street with a street frontage o~ eo~.~: ~==L, a..~ -,,, the frontage of 613.59 feet, immediately east of Coyote Canyon Park. Term Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive are presently improved with curb, gutter, and street pavement; and b. The prooerty to the north of the subject s te s s ngle-family residential including attached single-family str~ctures; the property to the south consists of single-family residentia; the property to the east is Coyote Canyon Park and multi-family apartment dwellings; and the property to the west is single-family residential; and c. The tentative tract map contains 1 lot for condominium purposes and I lot for ingress/egress; and d. The project s ocated in the Low-Medium Residential D strict (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the pm. posed density of 8.6 dwelhng umts per acre ts w~thtn the Medium Resident,al /¥7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.02-113 SUB'Iq'15724 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 2 District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium Residential District shall apply to the proposed development; and e. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report; and f. The proposed project and the intended use, together with ali Conditions of Approval will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project proponents are required to complete all missing parkway improvements adjacent to the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. That the design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development code, and the Terra Vista community Plan; and c. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable inju~J to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. That the tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. That the design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as 'amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been PLANNING cOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.02-113 SUB'I-1'15724- KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 3 reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the Califoroia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: ~ Division 1) The approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 is subject to the approval of the Term Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533, resulting in the land use amendment from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Residential (LM). 2) The final map(s) shall utilize the tentative tract number (e.g., 15724-1, 15724-2, etc.). Engineering Division 1) Term Vista Par~way frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Secondary Arterial" standards: a) Reconstruct a commercial drive approach for project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Complete the construction of raised median, between Greenwich Place and the easterly boundary of the project. 2)Mountain View Drive frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Collector Street" standards: a) Install commercial ddve approach for the project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Provide a pedestrian activated in-street flashing crosswalk at mid-block trail crossings of Mountain View Drive. 3) Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and · R26 signs, or repair/replace as needed. 4) Install manhole at public/private junction in storm drain system. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.02-113 SUB'I-r15724 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 4 5) Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans for trail in Lot A to indicate proposed fencing along tract boundary and any gates therein. Environmental Miti.qation Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management practices shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the Building Official. Air Quali~y '1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMlo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Term Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracldng of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduCe PMio emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 6)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Noise '1) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.02-113 SUBTr15724- KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 5 operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. 2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. .4) During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mondaythrough Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ^DOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2002. pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE cITY OF PJkNCHO CUCAMONGA "/Larry T~/,d~'tel, Chairman I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of December 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, STEWART City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT15724 and DRC2001-00381 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the acti°n and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project; 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially signifiCant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporlJng documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho CuCamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho CuCamonga, CA 91730 -.- 15£ Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT15724 and DRC2001-00381 KB HOME Page 2 3. Appropriate specialisls will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate wdtten approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is vedfied for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. .. 6. Unanticipated cimumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed b~' the project planner or responsible City deparl~nent and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the · authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance ~vith a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented~ 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)' with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff' time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall prOvide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.. SUB1'I'15724 and DRC2001-00381 Applicant: KB HOME Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meier Date: September 24~ 2002 The site shall be treated with water or other sail-stabilizing agent CP C Notes must be on AJC 2/4 (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) da y to reduce PM~o emissl~ls, Grading Plans in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. ' Terra Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Notes must beon A/C 2/4 established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with Grading Plans vehicJe tracking of soil off-efta. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Notes must be on A/C 2/4 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dudng such Grading Plans episodes. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Notes must be on A/C 2/4 be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 Grading Plans hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP C Notes must be on NC 2/4 ~1 used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. Grading Plans The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans Include a statement that all censtmction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' spantflcationa. The construction contractor shall utilize aiectdc or clean alternative fuel CP C Notes must be on A/C 2/4 powered equipment where feasible. Grading Plan8 The censtmcflon contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading CP C Notes must be on A/C 2/4 Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment Grading Plans when not In uae. During all proiect site excavation and grading, the project contractors CP C Monitor construction A 4 shell equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with pmpedy activities operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. The project contractor shall place all stational7 consthJc~on equipment CP C Monitor construction A 4 so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors rmamet activities the project site. The construction COntractor shall locate equipment staging in areas CP C Monitor construction A 4 that will create the greatest distance between construction related activities noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. During all project site constmchon, the construction contractor shall CP C Monitor construction A 4 limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise activities level to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Key to Checklist Abbreviations ODD - Community Development Director or designee ^ - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee 'C - Throughout Construction O - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D * On Completion D - Separate Sub,,,;[',=l (~-,F,u, '=, / S~l!''~ / Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order pO. Police Captain or designee E * Operating 5. Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Firs Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT15724 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 APPLICANT: KB HOME LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF cOYOTE CANYON PARK ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ComoletJon A. General Requirements Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /__/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 15724 is granted subject to the approval of Terra Vista /..._J Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. 3. Copies of the signed City Council Resolution of Approval, Standard Conditions, and all / ./.__ environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) ara for information only to all parties, involved in the construction/grading activities and ara not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Amhitect. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning / / Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. Project No, SUBTr15724 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which /___/ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein Development Code regulations, the Terra Vista Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all /._J Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code ___/___/ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~_..._/ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and Street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ._._/ / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development ~ / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map'or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home / / landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdi~,ision. sc.o,-o2 /5 7 Project No. SUB'I-r15724 Completion Date 2. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / ~ included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 3. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / /.~ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 4. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, / /.~ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. F. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of / ~ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable tO the City Planner in the amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and /.~/ location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for maitboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALl CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for /___/ approved openings: Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. 2. Reciprocal parking agreements for all pamels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint ._.._/~ maintenance of all common reads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or · deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 3. Private drainage easements for cress-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or ~.__/ noted on the final map. I. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: .~/ / I Street Name Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Cemm Median Bike Ot~er x x x Class II /TorraVistaParkwa¥ / / / x I xI I x I Classll ! Mountain View Drive Project No. SUB'I'r15724 Comoletion Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety / /.~ lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and = the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /~ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit /.___/ and intemonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. do Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or /.~_/ reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and intemonnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City ___/_~/ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __./._._/ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be .~/ / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan .~/ /..__ check. 3, Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The / / completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables, For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023. ,~ Project No. SUB3-F15724 Completion Date Min. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Grow Spacing Size* 'Qty. Space Terra Vista Srachychiton 20 feet Parkway Populneus Bottle tree 5-ft o c 15-gal *TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / / adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. J. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting .__/ / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be Ix)me by the developer. K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final ~ / map approval Dr the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside .diameter of any public storm drain pipe .__/ / measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. L. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, ___/_._/ ga~, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /_._/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamenga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pdor to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / / Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. s Project No. SuB'r'I'15724 Comoletion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-08-02 6 /~/ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0479 PROJECT #: SUBTT15724 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM REQUIRED: Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems with occupant notification LOCATION: 11011 Terra Vista Parkway FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Debra Meier ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date PLEASE CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION IMMEDIATELY REGARDING ITEMS IN SECTIONS "A" THROUGH "E" A. Outstanding Fire District Issues 1. The Fire District has previously provided the applicant with comments and technical requirements for this project. It the applicant has any questions regarding these comments or requirements they shall contact the Fire Safety Division. These conditions do not represent all technical requirements for issuance of construction or installation permits for this project. All comments, corrections, and conditions established by the Fire Safety Division shall be included in the construction of the project. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the Fire Safety Division to resolve any questions. R. Fire District Fees 1. Incomplete - Unpaid Fees: This project has outstanding unpaid service fees in the amount of $ that are due and payable at this time. To avoid delays in obtaining construction permits this matter must be resolved. Please remit payment by credit card or by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The fees are due for the following development and planning review services: a. $82 initial Review of commemial, industrial or multi-family residential projects $82- Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamon,qa Fire District." ** Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1.00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved bythe Fire Safety Division. *Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services Unit for review of fire protection system plans and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans. C. Community Facilities Districts Annexation 1. There are no Fire District annexation issues for this project. D. Available Water Supply 1. There are no Fire District water supply or fire flow issues for this project based on one of the following: a. The required verification of available water supply has been received. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form has been completed by the Water District and submitted to the Fire Safety Division; or b. The proiect does not require proof of available water supply or additional fire flow. E. Fire Access Issues 1. There are no outstanding "incompleteness" items related to FD access for this project. For outstanding technical issues see Section "GR-4" below. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - Informational, Procedural, Technical, or Operational and Must be Included, Corrected or Completed As Noted GR-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply 1. Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verification o:[ fire flow availability for the proposed project. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Hazardous Fire Area: The required minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1750 gpm at 20 p.s,i, residual. For structures in excess of 3600 square feet use Table A-III-A-1. This flow may be reduced when the structure is protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 GR-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1. Exceeds Allowable Distance: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 GR-3 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems- Technical Comments 1. Required Installations: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in any of the following: a. Multi-family residential structures Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 GR-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1. Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes. 2. Access Walkways: Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required exterior building openings. 3. Gates Standards: All gates shall be installed in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following general design requirements apply: a. The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must fully open with one second for each one foot of required width, e.g., 20-ft./20 sec. c. When fully open the minimum width shall be 20-feet. d. Gates on access roads designated "Emergency Services Use Only" may be manually opening. e. Gates on Commercial/Industrial facilities may be manually operated. f. After project approval the applicant shall contact the Fire Safety Division for complete standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4. Restricted Residential Access: Gated or access for all residential development shall comply with the following: a. APl automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. Approved devices are available from Opticom (3M), Fire Strobe 2000 (Access Products Inc.), and Tomar Electronics. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. A Knox Rapid Entry System Key Box is required to be installed adjacent to each gate in a Fire District approved location. The box shall be mounted where it is clearly visible and access is unobstructed. C. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. d. The key switch shall be located immediately adjacent to the Knox Box for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection. 5. Vegetation: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 6. Fire Lane Identification: All required fire lanes shall be identified by red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the FD Fire Lanes standard. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following: 1. Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans2 Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 2. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600- foot radius of the project. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3. Architectural Plans: Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit architectural plans for the review and approval of the Fire Safety Division. The Fire Safety Division review is intended to ensure that conditions established during the development review have been included in the design of the project. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 4. Building Use Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire District for review and approval. A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fire District comments. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 5. Combustible Construction Letter- Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. //,,5 RESOLUTION NO. 02-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00381, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15724 IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8- 14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON SCHOOL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1077-831-32. A. Recitals. 1. KB HOME filed an application for the approval of Design Review for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 13, and continued to December 11, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-raferencad meetings on November 13, and December 11, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Terra Vista Pal%-way with a street frontage of 487.22 feet, and on the north side of Mountain View Drive with a street frontage of 6'13.59 feet, immediately east of Coyote Canyon Park. Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive are presently improved with curb, gutter, and street pavement; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential including attached single-family structures, the property to the south consists of single-family residential, the property to the east is Coyote Canyon Park and multi-family apartment dwellings, and the property to the west is single-family residential; and c. The project is located in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the proposed density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre is within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to Residential review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium District shall apply to the proposed development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-114 DRC2001-0038'1 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 2 d. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report; and e. The proposed project and the intended use, together with all Conditions of Approval will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project proponents are required to complete all missing parkway improvements adjacent to the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on November 13, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Tire 14 of the California Code of Regulations. ? PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-114 DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs '1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and · incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Division : 1) The approval of Development Review DRC2002-00381 is subject to the approval of the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002- 00533, resulting in the land use amendment from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Residential (LM). 2)All retaining walls used throughout the project shall have a decorative surface to complement the building design. 3) At a minimum, the recreation amenity package shall include the following items (substitutions of amenities require staff approval): Amenity Points Tot lot 1 Open turf play 1 Picnic area/BBQ amenities 1 Seating nodes 1 Meandering pathways I_ TOTAL 5 En ineerin Division 1) Term Vista Parkway frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Secondary Arterial" standards: a) Reconstruct a commercial drive approach for project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Complete the construction of raised median, between Greenwich Place and the easterly boundary of the project. 2) Mountain View Drive frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Collector Street" standards: a) Install commercial drive approach for the project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Provide a pedestrian activated in-street flashing crosswalk at mid- block trail crossings of Mountain View Drive. 3)Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and R26 signs, or repair/replace as needed. 4) Install manhole at public/private junction in storm drain system. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-114 DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 4 5) Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans for trail in. Lot A to indicate proposed fencing along tract boundary and any gates therein. 6) Final Tract Map 15724 shall be recorded, prior to issuance of any building permit. Environmental Miti.qation Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. Best Management Practices shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the Building Official. Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Term Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. ' 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 6)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-114 DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME December 11, 2002 Page 5 Noise 1) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, r~ed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. 2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4) During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mondaythmugh Saturday.. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption 'of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: v -,~..any i~iel,-Chairman I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 11th day of December 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: coMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: cOMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, STEWART City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT15724 and DRC2001-00381 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been p~epared for;use in imp ementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are · implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation ~measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each acti°n necessary' This procedure designates Who will take action, what action will be ta!~en and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines.' As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases Of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Repoffing Forms to ensure they ara filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incuned by the. City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be rePorted. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ill Mitigation Monitoring Program SUB'TI'15724 and DRC2001-00381 KB HOME Page 2 3. Appropriate specialisfs will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed' as determined by the project plan, nar or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the project planner. , , · 4. The project planner or responsible City department will' approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each , measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. AIl MMP Reporting F°rms f°r an impact issue requinng n° further m°nitonng w~ll be signed °ff as coropleted by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is resp0nsibl .e for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, Or operational personnel. · 7'. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been Issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation roeasure for the required period of time. 9. those instances requiring Iong-tem~ project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City rwnth a lan for monitoring the mitigation activ ties at the project s~te and reporting the monitonng resul~sP~o the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Developroent Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. I?Z MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUB'I'r15724 and DRC2001-00381 Applicant: KB HOME Initial Study Prepared by: . Debra Meier Date: September 24~ 2002 C NC 2/4 Terra Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule CP C 2/4 established by the City to reduce PM~o emlsalons associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-alta, Timing may vmy depending upon time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind epsods exceed CP C Notes must be on NC 2/4 . 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such Grading Plane episodes. · -- Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by $CAQMD and RWQCB) shell CP · C Notes must be on A/'C 2/4 be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 Grading Plane The construction oontmotor shall solsot the constmstlon equipment CP C Notes must be on .NO 2/4 used on-site based on Iow emlsstonfactom and high-energy efficiency. Grading Ptans The construction contractor shall ensure the Cormtmclton Grading Plans include a statement that all constmctton equipment will be tuned and mstntstned In accordance with the manufacturers' epodflontiona. The construction contractor shall utillze elecstsor clean aitema'~ve luel CP · G Notes must be on NO 2/4 powered equipraent where feasible. Grading Plane The construction contractor shell ensure that Construction Grading CP C Notsu must be on NO 2/4 Plane Include a stateraant that we~ crews will shut off equipment Grading Plane when not In use. = and grading, the project conlractom C Molfltar ~xxtstm~lon A ... shell equip ati ooastrucUon equipment, fixed or mobile, ~ propedy a~Nitles operating and maintained mufflers ~oaslatent with manutacturem steflderds. The pr°Jeer contractor shall ~ece ell 8tetjoflaf~(~flsl~uc~c~ e(~dp~ent OP C I A4ofl~c)r coflstru~an A es thet embed noJas la dJmcted sway from asflsJtive recxJl~Oro flasre~t 4 the preject site. ~vities The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging iff areas CP C Monitor coflstmctlon A 4 that will create the greatest distance between construction reletad n°lse and the ndies-sensitive receptors nesrest the project alta dudng activities all project construction. During all project site construction, the construction contradictor shal! ! CP I C limit all construction related activities that would result in ~lgh noise Monitor oonetruction A 4 level to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8.'~ p.re. Mondey through activities ~aturday. No construction shall be atiowed on ~undeys end publlo holidays, Key to Checklist Abbreviations COD - Community Development Director or designee A- With Each New Devalo~mant A* Co-site taspect~on 1 - Withhold Reco[Ga[[,ai~ of F'inet Map CP - City P;&rr.,~, or designee B - Prior To ConstrucEon B - Other Agency Pen,nE / Atopmval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Ce~ticata of ~,~,,~/ BO - Building Official or ~-~;:;,,ee D - CO Co,~p;eGu,, D. ~..~; _..;~ Sub,,,;[:-: (Reloorts / ~h ,d!=. / Plane) 4 - Stop Work Order PO- Police Captain or designee E - O~eratlng 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00381 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 APPLICANT: KB HOME LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, /__/ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of DRC2001-00381 is granted subject to the approval of Terra Vista Community /__/ Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. 3. Copies of the signed City Council Resolution of Approval, Standard Conditions, and all /___/ environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Amhitect. B. Time Umits i 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if l / / building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC-08-02 I /15 Project No. DRC2001-00381 Comoletton Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / / include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Terra Vista Community Plan, and the Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / /___ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code / /.~ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / ' / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development ./ / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and / / approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles ara provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy pdor to approval of the final map. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association ara subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property __/~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and - approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 2 Project No. DRC2001-00381 Completion Date 13. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double /_.__J wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. 14. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each /_~/ support p. ost for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Y=-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 15. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / / 16. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. / / 17. For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the / / Development Code. 18. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be / / manufactured products. D. Building Design 1. All dwellings shall have the front, side and roar elevations upgraded with architectural / / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for / / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be arohitecturaily integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details On building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space / / abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be / / ._ provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / / depth from back of sidewalk. 6. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles .~_/.~ on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. sc.o 2 , 177 Project No, DRC2001-00381 Completion Date F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home __/ .. / landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided /.___/ within the project 10% 36-inch box or larger, 10% 24-inch box or larger, and 80% 15-gallon. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three /.__/ parking stalls. 4. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than /.__~ 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or / /__ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. fl. of slope area, l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ff. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shali be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible / ~ for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalk, s shall be __J / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required'to be installed within the public right-of-way on __.J / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9. All wails shall be provided with decorative treatment, if located in public maintenance areas, .~/ / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of /__/ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. G. Signs 1. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Project No. DRC2001-00381 Completion Date H. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~ / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permitS, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for fodeit. I. !~ Other Agencies '1~. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and /~ location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQuIREMENTs AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: /.~J a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /_._/ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage /___/ to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /----/ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by /___/ the Building and Safety Division. Project No. DR02001-OO381 Completion Date K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ___/ /.__ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2002-00381). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the ../ / applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate~ Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt td the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map ../ / recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday ___/ / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. L New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Califomia'Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances ../ / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. ! / 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturar's "high wind" instructions. __/ / 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC .._._/ / Section 1505. 5. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls. ----/ / 6. Roofing materials shall be Class 'A.' -~/ / 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC __/ ./ Table ,SA 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. ._._/ ! 9. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the ._.J ! construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. 10. Walls and floors separating dwelling Units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour / / fire-resistive construction. M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City .__/ / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _._/ / perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the __/ / time of application for grading plan check. sc.o o, '. / g b Project No. DRC2001-00381 Completion Date 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, .__/ / submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for / / approved openings: Terra Vista Parkway and. Mountain View Drive. 2. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint / / maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 3. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / / noted on the final map. O. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / Street Name Curb & .4.C. Side.- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Ottlet' Terra Vista Parkway x x x Class II Mountain View Drive I I I x I x I I x J I Classll 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety / / lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Pdor to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic'signal conduit, /___/ and interconnect conduit shall be installed t° the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or /___/ reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect widng. Puli boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer sc-0,0, , /$/ project No. DRC2001-00381 Completion Date Notes: 1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City ~ / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with .~/ / adequate detours during construction.. Street'or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be ...~ installed to city Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan /~ check. 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in /~ accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The /__/ completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name sGrO~ Spacing ~Terra Vista Brachychifon ! Parkway Populneus Bottle tree 25-ff 15-ga *TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement .plans only. 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer'for conformance with / / adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. Project No. DRC2001-00381 Completion Date Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final .~/ / map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe / / measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. R. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, __/ / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _~/ / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the .... ./ / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs flint. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / / Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, / / with direct lighting to be provided by ail entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 2. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / T. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doom. / / 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doom. If windows are / / within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. / / U. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be / / lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or / / prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. Project No. DRC2001-00381 Comolefion Date V.' Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for /_._/ nighttime visibility. 2. At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of /~ project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. 3. All developments shall submit an 8 Y2" x 11 · sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi- ~ / tenant developments to the Police Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATFACHED DRAFT MINUTES C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUB']-r15724- KB HOME- A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lettered lot for ingress/egress on 9.05 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-831-32. Related Files: Development Review DRC2001-00381 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002- 00533. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from November 11, 2002) Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She reported the applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 10 and many of the items discussed traffic, future signals, on-street parking, and the land use change. Chairman McNiel opened the public headng. Jary Cockroff, KBHOME, 801 Corporate Center Ddve, Suite 20, Pomona, accepted the conditions. Regarding the density increase, he stated it is a slight increase over 8 dwelling unites per ac~e, but they felt it is an appropriate transition between the single-family homes to the east and the apartment project to the west. Cynthia Stuckey, 11098 Cloverdale Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she lives south of the proposed project. She said she has lived there for 15 years. She noted it was supposed to have been a school. She felt residents should have been consulted. She acknowledged that it looks like it will be a nice development but felt it should be developed at a rate of not more than 8 dwelling units per acre. She was concerned about the traffic survey and said she saw a gentleman at Fairhaven Place and Mountain View Ddve from 7-9 a.m., but at times he did not appear to be observing the traffic. She stated that ddvers go in excess of 55 mph on Mountain View Ddve when the posted speed is 35 mph. She said that when making a left on Mountain View Ddve, it is necessary to pull out into the street in order to be able to see because there is a bind comer. Mrs. Stuckey indicated there was a fatality a few months ago. She did not feel the hours surveyed were adequate. She thought the traffic should have been observed from 5-8 a.m. and again from 4-7 p.m. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Mrs. Stuckey attended the neighborhood meeting. Ms. Stuckey replied that she did and the developer said the traffic study was for a 45-minute period and no problems were observed. Chairman McNiel suggested the Police could perhaps do some setups to monitor speeds. Mrs. Stuckey noted there will be additional cars from the development. She thanked staff, in particular Debra Meier, for doing an excellent job in trying to answer questions. Mr. Cockmft stated he did not have the full traffic study at the neighborhood meeting but only had a summary. He said he was not the one who made the statement the traffic was studied for only a 45-minute pedod. He said they tested two times: 7:00 - 8:45 a.m. and 4:00 - 5:45 p.m. He indicated it was a focused study that the City Traffic Engineer reviewed with LSA. He felt it is in accordance with engineering traffic requirements and is appropriate. Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 11, 2002 DRAFT MINUTES Commissioner Mannedno' asked what day of the week the survey was conducted. Ms. Meier responded it was Tuesday and Wednesday, November 5 and 6. Headng no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public headng. Commissioner Mannerino felt it is a nice project in keeping with other structures in the area. Chairman McNiel asked if traffic on this street has been reported as being a problem. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, responded that the City has not received any complaints. He indicated that traffic statistics were compiled for accidents from January 1, 1998 through December 31,2001, and the report showed no accidents on Mountain View Drive between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue. Chairman McNiel stated the streets were designed to handle potential traffic the City anticipates at build-out, based upon the General Plan put together 20 years ago and recently reviewed and revised. Commissioner Tolstoy appreciated the conclusions of the traffic study and stated he would support approval of the project. Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Tolstoy, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTI'15724 and Development Review DRC2001-00381. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MACIAS, STEWART - carded Planning Commission Minutes -6- December 11, 2002 RESOLUTION NO. 03-*~)~)~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT15724, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 9.05-ACRES OF LAND INTO I LOT FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES, AND 1 LETTERED LOT FOR INGRESS/EGRESS, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-831-32. A. RECITALS. 1. KB HOME filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT15724, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On November 13, and continued to December 11, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. Following conclusion of said hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 02-113 recommending approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT15724. 3. On the 15th day of January 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted their review of Tentative Tract SUB'I-F15724. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on January 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway with a street frontage of 487.22 feet, and on the north side of Mountain View Drive with a street frontage of 613.59 feet, immediately east of Coyote · Canyon Park, both Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive are presently improved with curb, gutter, and street pavement; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** SUBTT15724 - KB HOME January 15,2003 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential including attached single-family structures; the property to the south consists of sing!e-family residential at a density of 18.9 dwelling units per acre; the property to the west is Coyote Canyon Park and multi:family apartment dwellings; and the property to the east is single-family residential at a density of 7.7 dwelling units per acre; and c. The tentative map contains 1 lot for condominium purposes and 1 lot for ingress/egress; and d. The project is located in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the proposed density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre is within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium Residential District shall apply to the proposed development; and e. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report; and f. The proposed project and the intended use, together with all Conditions of Approval will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project .proponents are required to complete all missing parkway improvements adjacent to the site. 3. Based on the substantial evidence presented to the Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** SUBTT15724 - KB HOME January 15,2003 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral staff reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the meeting, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) The approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 is subject to the approval of the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533, resulting in the land use amendment from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Residential (LM). 2) The final map(s) shall utilize the tentative tract number (e.g., 15724-1, 15724-2, etc.). 3) The final map(s) shall utilize the tentative tract number (e.g., 15724-1, 15724-2, etc.). CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** SUBTT15724 - KB HOME January 15,2003 Page 4 Enqineerin,q Division 1) Terra Vista Parkway frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Secondary Arterial" standards: a) Reconstruct a commercial drive approach for project entry, Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Complete the construction of raised median, between Greenwich Place and the easterly boundary of the project. 2) Mountain View Drive frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Collector Street" standards: a) Install commercial drive approach for the project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. Provide a pedestrian activated in-street flashing crosswalk at mid-block trail crossings of Mountain View Drive. 3) Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and R26 signs, or repair/replace as needed. 4) Install manhole at public/private junction in storm drain system. 5) Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans for trail in Lot A to indicate proposed fencing along tract boundary and any gates therein. Environmental Mitiqation Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that identifies Best Management Practices to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** SUBTT15724 - KB HOME January 15, 2003 Page 5 shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the Building Official. Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Terra Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction- Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Noise 1) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** SUBTT15724 - KB HOME January 15,2003 Page 6 2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4) During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 03-~ ~) 7 a RESOLUTION Of The City council Of tHe CItY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00381, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15724, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-831-32. A. RECITALS. 1. KB HOME filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00381, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the November 13 and continued to December 11, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. Following conclusion of said hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 02-113 approving Development Review DRC2001-00381. 3. On the 15th day of January 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted their review of Development Review DRC2001-00381. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga as follows: 1. This Council specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on January 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway with a street frontage of 487.22 feet, and on the north side of Mountain View Drive with a street frontage of 613.59 feet, immediately east of Coyote Canyon Park, both Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive are presently improved with curb, gutter, and street pavement; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME January 15, 2003 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential including attached single-family structures; the property to the south consists of single-family residential; the property to the west is Coyote Canyon Park and multi- family apartment dwellings at a density of 18.9 dwelling units per acre; and the property to the east is single-family residential at a density of 7.7 dwelling units per acre; and c. The tentative map contains 1 lot for condominium purposes; and d. The project is located in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the proposed density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre is within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan. This flexibility is allowed in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. The standards of the Medium Residential District shall apply to the proposed development; and e. The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, building separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report; and f. The proposed project and the intended use, together with all Conditions of Approval will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project proponents are required to complete all missing parkway improvements adjacent to the site. 3. Based on the substantial evidence presented to the Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and d. That the p~'oposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral staff reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME January 15, 2003 Page 3 attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the meeting, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) The approval of Development Review DRC2001-00381 is subject to the approval of the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533, resulting in the land use amendment from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Residential (LM). 2) All retaining walls used throughout the project shall have a decorative surface to complement the building design. 3) At a minimum, the recreation package shall include the following items (substitutions of amenities require staff approval): Amenity Points Tot lot 1 Open turf play 1 Picnic areaJBBQ amenities 1 Seating nodes 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME January 15, 2003 Page 4 Meandering pathways 1 TOTAL 5 Enqineering Division 1) Terra Vista Parkway frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Secondary Arterial" standards: a) Reconstruct a commercial drive approach for project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Complete the construction of raised median, between Greenwich Place and the easterly boundary of the project. 2) Mountain View Drive frontage improvements shall be completed in accordance with the City "Collector Street" standards: a) Install commercial drive approach for the project entry. Remove unused drive approaches and replace sidewalks and street trees. b) Provide a pedestrian activated in-street flashing crosswalk at mid-block trail crossings of Mountain View Drive. 3) Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees, street lights and R26 signs, or repair/replace as needed. 4) Install manhole at public/private junction in storm drain system. 5) Revise existing Landscape Maintenance District plans for trail in Lot A to indicate proposed fencing along tract boundary and any gates therein. Environmental Mitiqation Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the Building Official. Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 03-** DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME January 15, 2003 Page 5 2) Surrounding streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Noise 8) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturer's standards. 9) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 10) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 11) During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. /97 TH E CiTY OF I~ANCflO Cl3CA~ONGA DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buffer, City Planner BY: Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOW VERIZON WIRELESS TO PERFORM ON-SITE TESTING AT THE EPICENTER FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING THE SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY TO INSTALL A WIRELESS MONOPALM COMMUNICATION TOWER. BACKGROUND: Mericom Corporation, on behalf of Verizon Wireless, has been negotiating a Lease Hold Agreement with City staff for the placement of one monopalm wireless communication facility at the Epicenter. Prior to finalizing the lease hold agreement with the City, Mericom Corporation, on behalf of Verizon Wireless, would like to determine the suitability of the site by performing tests, such as soil samples. The City Attorney has developed an Access License and Indemnity Agreement to allow wireless carriers and their consultant team onto the site to perform these tests while ensuring that the City's interests are concurrently protected. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Mayor sign these agreem(~nts to allow Verizon Wireless to perform the on-site tests. Brad Buffer City Planner BB:DG:Is Attachment: Access License and Indemnity Agreement ACCESS LICENSE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT Th/s ACCESS LICENSE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of ,2003 between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California Municipal Corporation ("Owner") and Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless by Ah'Touch Cellular, its general partner ("Licensee"), with reference to the following facts: A. Owner holds title to one (1) certain parcel of real property located with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California and is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" hereto. The parcel is described as: 1. 8408 Rochester Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Assessor Parcel Numbers for the parcel and to access the parcel include: 0229-011-07 0229-011-17 0229-011-29 Parcel 1 shall be referred to as the "Property." B. Owner and Licensee are negotiating the terms of a Lease Agreement whereby Licensee may locate certain electronic transmission facilities on Property. C. Pending execution of the Lease Agreements Licensee desires the right to enter upon the Property for purpose of reviewing the suitability of the Property for Licensee's use and development. Such entry shall include the conducting of investigations, studies, surveys, inspections, and tests of the Property, as Licensee deems reasonably necessary to determine the suitability of the Property for its intended purpose. (The "Feasibility Study"). D. Owner desires to grant a license to Licensee for such purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: I. Grant of License. From and after the date hereof until March 1, 2003~ Licensee (and Licensee's agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors) shall have the non-exclusive right and license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of performing the Feasibility Study; provided that in conducting all such activities Licensee: (i) complies with all applicable laws and regulations; and (ii) obtains and maintains the insurance described in Paragraph 3 below. All costs of such work and activity shall be borne solely by Licensee. Neither Licensee nor its contractors or agents shall make any physical alterations to the Property beyond those necessary to perform the Feasibility 1 Study, nor shall they disturb insects, animals, trees, shrubs or any drainage courses and shall return the Property to either (a) the same condition as it existed prior to the operations of Licensee pursuant to this Agreement, or (b) if approve by Owner, Licensee may leave the Property in whole or in part in its changed condition. 2. Condition of Property Upon Completion. In no event shall Licensee discontinue its work on or vacate the Property leaving an tmsafe condition remaining. If such should occur, Licensee shall pay to Owner the cost Owner incurs to make such conditions safe. 3. Insurance. Before entering onto the Property, Licensee shall secure and maintain, with an insurance company(s) licensed and admitted in California, the following: (i) a comprehensive general liability and property damage policy in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000), limit, which will cover the activities of Licensee and its agents and consultants on the Property, naming Owner an additional insured, and (ii) workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in accordance with the provisions of California law. Before entering on the Property, Licensee shall furnish Owner with certificates of insurance issued by the appropriate insurance carrier(s) demonstrating compliance with the terms of this paragraph and providing that such insurance shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days written notice to Owner issued by the insurer. 4. Indemnity Regarding Licensee's Activities. Licensee shall indemnify, defend (by counsel reasonably acceptable to Owner) and hold harmless Owner from and against all claims, causes of action, damages, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs), arising out of or related to the presence on or around the Property of, and any work or activities engaged in by, Licensee and Licensee's agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement, or related to the commission or omission of any act in connection with such conduct, except to the extent caused by or arising fxom (a) Owner's or its agents actions or failures to act; (b) latent defects in the Property which are discovered during Licensee's Feasibility Study; and (c) the presence of any hazardous or regulated substances on, under, or about the Property which were not introduced to the Property by Licensee or Licensee's agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors. 5. Notices. All notices and demands which either party is required or desires to give to the other shall be given in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested with appropriate postage prepaid, by personal delivery, by facsimile or by private overnight courier service to the address or facsimile number set forth below such parties' signature, provided that if any party gives notice of a change of name or address or number, notices to that party shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice. All notices and demands so given shall be effective only upon receipt by the party to whom notice or demand is being given. 6. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any action by Owner or Licensee concerning the subject matter of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to 2 recover fi-om the non-prevailing party its costs and expenses of enforcing its fights hereunder, including actual attorneys' fees. 7. Binding on Successors. The terms and conditions herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 8. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 9. Partial Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement shall continue in full fome and effect and shall in no way be impaired or invalidated, and the parties agree to substitute for the invalid or unenforceable provision a valid and enfomeable provision that most closely approximates the intent and economic effect of the invalid or unenfomeable provision. 10. Entire Agreement. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and cannot be amended or modified except by a written agreement, executed by each of the parties hereto. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A California Municipal Corporation By: Its: 10500 Civic Cgnter Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Arm: Planning Division Fax: (909) 477-2847 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless by AirTouch Cellular, its General Address if by means other than courier: Address if by courier: Tel: Fax: IAPLANNING~DAN~Cellular~ACCESS LICENSE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT.doc 4 DEC-18-2002 lED 03:27 P~ L~!,IYEP,,.8 CU~TOI'IEE SERVICE Fi~ NO. 909 388 2187 p, 20 ' DEC-18-2002 lIED 03:28 PR LRIIYERS CUSTOI1ER SERVICE F~ NO, 909 386 2167 P, 21 ..... ~ ,'~ ~ { · .. '. .... . * ..~&,~.r...:..- .~.-~. ~ }~- i ..... ~ ,., , -,~¢..~~ -1 I)E0:18-2002 ~D 03:21 P{'I LAI, IYERS CUSTOi'IEI~ SERVIOE FAX lqO, 909 388 2187 P, 22 E A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E~NGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: January 15, 2003 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark N. Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR DR 00-60, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET BETWEEN LA GRANDE STREET AND LOMITA DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DR 00-60, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-60, located on the east side of Amethyst Street between La Grande Street and Lomita Drive, in the Mixed-Use District with a Senior Housing Overlay District, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 21, 2002, for the development of 96 senior apartments on 3.2 acres of land. The Developer, Northtown Housing Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $168,800.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 84,400.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 00-60 January 15, 2002 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, _~lli,,a~m J. O'Neil ~i~'"Engineer WJO:MNB:sc Attachments BASELINE ROAD FooTHILL ( ROUTE 66 ) BOULEVARD City of . Item: Staff Report Rancho Cucamonga Title: Vicinity Map IENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: #1 (DR00:60) RESOLUTION NO. {~),~ "~0~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-60 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Northtown Housing Development Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Amethyst Street between Le Grande Street and Lomita Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DR 00-60; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, 224EREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. O..~' ~t~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR DR 00-60 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. i (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the fight of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article Xlm3 of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XlllD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, ail of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. DR 00-60 January 15, 2003 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Ten/tory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WH]EREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been detenrdned in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL NO. 1 ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 8 OF CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 6, PAGE 46 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SALE} COUNTY, AND OF ALTA LOMA TOWNS1TE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 84 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 8 OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 6, PAGE 46 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THENCE SOUTH 89058'30'' EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5,730.87 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTH LINE WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY, 783.06 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WITH THE WEST LINE OF LOT "B" OF THE ALTA LOMA TOWNSITE, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 84 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 00027'20'' WEST, ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT "B" 66.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 OF SAID ALTA LOMA TOWNSITE; THENCE NORTH 89058'30'' WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5 AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION 104.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 00027'20'' WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID ALTA LOMA TOWNSITE AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5, BLOCK 8, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS 343.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. EXHIBIT 'A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE'MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, ^~:rA LO/~A EL~AJE'~T4,IB)' .~ 16,~0 Lu~ HFsv 5~RE~ LI ~HT I DRO0-60 LOMIT-A DRIVE ,ALL. E¥ '-: '-_ i .: .... ' - 4-  CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTll COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DROO-GO .~3 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails, which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites arc not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the r~ghts-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003) For Project: DR 00-60 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 3 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L1 12 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 L 1 7 1 0.5 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Physical ' # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7699 1.0 7699 $92.21 $709.924.79 Multi- Unit 7091 0.5 3545.5 $92.21 $326,930.56 Family Comm/Ind Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,037,039.77 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-60) is: 7 Dwelling Units x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $322.74 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I~nd lT~e Unit Tv~e llnitg llnit~ Fantnr ~'nilg ITnit gewn,e Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Family Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DR 00-60) is: 7 Dwelling Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $124.39 Annual Assessment c-1 CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY CONSENT AND WAIVER TO ANNEXATION FOR DR 00-60 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STATE OF CAI JFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Wll J.IAM J. O"NEIL, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the 15th day of January 2003, I reviewed a Consent and Waiver to Annexation pertaining to the annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Waiver to Annexation to be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Waiver to Annexation has been signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Waiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this 15th day of January 2003, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA tHE C I ~ Y 0 F ]~AN C H 0 C IICAM 0 N GA Stafl:Re rt DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRCDR00-79, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY BURNETT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRCDR00-79, accepting the subject agreement and securities, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: DRCDR00-79, in the Haven Overlay District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 22, 2001. This project is for the construction of four (4) retail buildings. The DeveloPer, Burnett Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $614,200.00 Labor and Material Bond $307,100.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRCDR00-79 January 15, 2003 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office Respectfully submitted., Wil~am J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachment r v~a I r~lu. UU~JL.~.VAI~ D  ~ AR~D~ ROUTE SITE CITY OF rrg~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 7/I RESOLUTION NO. O ,~" O/D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRCDR00-79 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on January 15, 2003, by Bumett Development Corporation as Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DRCDR00-79; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. 220 RESOLUTION NO. 0,-~" ~} ~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRCDR00-79 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the ConstitUtion of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); arid WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Temtory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and ,22/ RESOLUTION NO. DRCDR00-79 January 15, 2003 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All futura proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: BURNETT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: Parcel of land, situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, being Parcel 1 as described in that certain Certificate of Compliance No. 536 for Lot Line Adjustment recorded October 2, 2002 as Document No. 20020522990 of Official Records of said San Bemardino County, California The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 223 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I/ ,,, u ....... ~ ~-~'--~ CiViC CENTE~~ · ~r z/~7~ I~ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LIVID #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. This sites maintaihed by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. 225 Exhibit "B" continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2002/2003) For Project: DRCDR00-79 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SD # 1 ...... 10 ...... SLD#6 3 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA L3B ......... 55 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 6 L 3B 3.71 7.42 3.71 3.71 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2002/2003 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Tvoe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRCDR00-79) is: 3.71 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $1,308.89 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Tyne Units Units Factor Units Unit Reventl¢ Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRCDR00-79 is: 3.71 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $65.93 Annual Assessment C-1 227 Exhibit "C" continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Twe Ii'nits Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRCDR00-79) is: 3.71 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $190.69 Annual Assessment THE CITY OF ~AN CII 0 CU CAI'10N C,A SlaffR ort DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES (FUTURE BUS BAY INSTALLATION ON 6TM STREET) FOR DR 00-31, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 6TM STREET, SUBMITTED BY JPI LIFESTYLE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to the Developer, JPI Lifestyle Apartments Communities. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: DR 00-31, located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street, in the Mixed Use Planning Area IX (Subarea 18) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2000. The project is for the development of 521 apartments on 20.46 acres of land. The Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for DR 00-31 were approved by the City Council on April 18 2001. One of the said a~nreement and securities was for the future nstallation of a bus bay on the north side of 6 Street. Said agreement is no longer needed due to cash deposit $52,330.00) as full payment by the Developer to the City. Respectfully submitted, Wll~m J. O Nell City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachment ARROW ROUTE PROJECT LOCATION ~ 6TH ST. 4TH ST. SAN,.BERNARDINO (10)FREEWAY /'-"-'x "-" AIRPORT DR. CITY OF rmv: -_~:~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITL~ J~~~~ ENGINE. EKING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. -//2_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES (FUTURE BUS BAY INSTALLATION ON 6TM STREET) FOR DR 00-31 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopted a Resolution on April 18, 2001, accepting an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities from Jefferson at Empire Lakes, L.P.; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities are for the future installation of a bus bay on the north side of 6th Street; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities are no longer required due to cash deposit as full payment by the Developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities (future Bus Bay installation on 6th Street) from DR 00-31. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENC, INI~I~I~INC, D~PAI~T~r NT Staff Report DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lucinda Hackett, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Eng~neenng TechnielarY:~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE CHURCH STREET RIGHT TURN LANE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO 500' WEST, CONTRACT NO. 02-024 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $50,042.52 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Church Street Right Turn Lane from Haven Avenue to 500' West, Contract No. 02-024, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $49,519.50 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $5,004.25, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $50,042.52. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $50,042.52, which included one contract change order resulting in a change in the odginal contract amount of 1.06%. The original amount approved by Council was $54,471.45 ($49,519.50 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:LH/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP P.r~oject. Sire. .' ~ :~ ' "= ~, 24TH ST AVE' - BASE UNE BNSF RR CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · CHURCH STREET (FROM w~V~I AV~. TO 400' PA~.MENT REHAB~I.rrATION N.?.S. RESOLUTION NO. ~)~ --//~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CHURCH STREET RIGHT TURN LANE FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO 500' WEST, CONTRACT NO. 02-024 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Church Street Right Tum Lane from Haven Avenue to 500' West, Contract No. 02-024, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. R A N C h 0 C U C a M O N G A ]~ NC IN E E I~IN G Df: DAI~ T ~II~N T StaffR ort DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry Dyer, Project Manager ~ A FROM: Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician :~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE ETIWANDA AVENUE GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AT' THE BNSF AND SCRRA RAILROAD CROSSINGS, CONTRACT NO. 02-067 AS COMPLETE, RETAIN THE PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $254,868.28 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements at the BNSF and SCRRA Railroad Crossings, Contract No. 02-067, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a guarantee bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $222,660.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $25,486.83, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $254,868.28. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $254,868.28, which included eight contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 14.47%. The original amount approved by Council was $244,926.00 ($222,660.00 plus 10%). Respectfully submitte~d,n ~ f Willi~atn.,J. O'N~il WC it~._ E~g i n ej O:~a,/R O :1/r Attachments r.../ J I ~ ................................. --: :--" · ~'. L ~ ~ ' .... PROJ[CT LOCATION J ' ~~ C~ 0F B~NCHO CUC~0NGA - ~C~ ~ ET~DA A~NUE GR~E CROSSING IMPRO~MENTS AT THE BNSF ~D SCR~ ~O~ CROSSINGS RESOLUTION NO. ~)5-//¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA AVENUE GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE BNSF AND SCRRA RAILROAD CROSSINGS, CONTRACT NO. 02-067 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements at the BNSF and SCRRA Railroad Crossings, Contract No. 02-067, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO. &95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P~ANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 9.26 OP TITLE 9 OF THE PJ~NCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT OH BUSINESS WHILE IN OR ON A PUBLIC STREBT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City hereby finds that there continues to be public safety and traffic flow problems created by persons running into, going upon and remaining in the streets and swarming cars to solicit work from persons traveling in vehicles and that it is necessary to continue to have an ordinance that prohibits solicitation of persons traveling in vehicles while in or upon a street or highway. However, the City finds that it is appropriate to amend Chapter 9.26 to clarify certain terms to more clearly state the original and continuing intent of the Chapter. These amendments are clarifications of existing law and reflect the manner in which the Chapter has previously been applied and ehforced. Section 2. Section 9.26.030 of Chapter 9.26 of Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 9.26.030(a) Solicitation While On or In A Public Street or Hiqhway. It shall be unlawful for any person(s) physically present in or on a street or highway, to solicit the occupant(s) of any vehicle traveling upon any street or highway. This section does not prohibit solicitation by persons off the street or highway, or on a sidewalk." "Section 9.26.030(b) Solicitation Defined. "Solicitation" shall mean any request, offer, enticement, or action, which announces the availability of employment, services, goods, or seeks a donation or contribution. "Solicitation" does not include the distribution of free literature, flyers or leaflets." "Section 9.26.030(c) Street, Highway and Sidewalk Defined. The terms "street", "highway" and "sidewalk" shall have those meanings as set forth in Sections 360, 509 and 555, respectively, of the California Vehicle Code, or any successor provisions thereto. Section 3. Violation Penalty. "Section 9.26.040 Violation Penalty. "Any person engaging in any activity declared unlawful by subsection (a) of Section 9.26.030 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished as set forth in Section 1.12.020 of Chapter 1.12 of Title 1 of this Code." Section 4. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2002. MAYOR I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __day of 2002, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __day of , 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: CITY CLERK TH E CITY OF I~A N CH 0 Cu CAI~I ON C,A Staff Report DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts). RECOMMENDATION At its December 11, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the subject application by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-124. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council amend the Development Code to permit Mixed Use Public Storage to be a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial designation of Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts and adopt a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The analysis and findings are contained in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report of December 11,2002, and Resolution No. 02-124. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, and notices were mailed to all property owners within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Districts and within 300 feet of the zoning district boundaries. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00875 - OlTYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Janua~ 15,2003 Page 2 CONCLUSION If the City Council concurs with the Commission's findings, it would be appropriate to adopt the Development Code provisions by the approval of the attached Ordinance. ResUbmitted, ~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:mlg Attachment: Exhibit '!A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 11,2002 T H £ CITY OF I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: December 11,2002 TO:. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROIvt Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts). PROJECT: This amendment is a proposal to allow Mixed Use Public Storage in the Regional Related Commercial District along Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway. This use is not presently authorized in any form in this area. BACKGROUND: This amendment was initiated in response to a request by a potential tenant within the former Costco building within the Foothill Marketplace shopping center that is located within Subarea 4 on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of the 1-15 Freeway. Subarea 4 is located along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and acts as a major gateway into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This request was brought to the attention of the Planning Commission at its regularly scheduled meeting on October 9, 2002. At that meeting the Planning Commission authorized the initiation of a formal application by the City. ANALYSIS: The intent of the Regional Related Commercial District (RRC) is to cater to a veritable mix of uses that are designed to: a. Promote day- and night-time patronage b. Compliment its regional location adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway Corridor c. Attract patrons from surrounding market areas The RRC district of Subarea 4 is located on the east side of the 1-15 Freeway to Etiwanda Avenue along the south side of Foothill Boulevard. A small portion of the north side of Foothill Boulevard immediately adjacent to the 1-15 on-ramp is also within the RRC District. The larger portion on the south side is completely developed with a major shopping center of which the vacant Costco building is a part. The General Plan land use designation for this area is General Commercial. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11,2002 Page 2 Mixed Use Public Storage is defined in Section 17.32.030C.2 as follows: Mixed Use Public Storage. Activities include the rental or /ease of small-scale, enclosed storage units or parking spaces when in combination with retail or office uses. Uses typically include self-storage facilities with caretaker's residence and recreational vehicle storage. Storage shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from Foothill Boulevard and screened from view. It does not include automotive fleet storage, rental car lots, or ovemight storage of service vehicles. With the vast majodty of the RRC district developed, the most likely scenado for public storage activity would be within previously constructed buildings, such as is being proposed in conjunction with this amendment. Public storage uses typically produce much less potential for negative activities (i.e., traffic congestion, noise, etc.) than the more intense retail commercial uses. The only potential negative aspect of this proposal might be to lessen the dynamics within a shopping center by locating a use that breaks-up and divides the "shopping activities." Staff believes this can be avoided by making sure that the public storage is located to the rear of a site where the "shopping activity" is not cdtical to a successful shopping center. The conditions listed below should provide the necessary measures to ensure appropriate locations for a public storage facility. Staff recommends that Public storage be authorized within Subarea 4, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, as follows (add as footnote #5 to Development Code Table 17.32.030): Public Storage may be located in the RRC district only within an enclosed building. No outdoor storage is permitted. The public storage use may occupy a portion of an existing retail building provided the building is at least 50,000 square feet, the public storage use does not occupy the first 100 foot depth of storefront leasable area, and the public storage use does not occupy more than 50 percent of the building. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff completed Initial Study Parts I and II and determined that there will not be a significant adverse impact on the environment as a result of this Development Code Amendment. Staff, therefore, recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, and notices were mailed to all property owners within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Districts and within 300 feet of the zoning district boundaries. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council adoption of this amendment by the approval of the attached Resolution. City ~lanner Attachments.' ~xhibit "A" Regional Related Commercial District Map Exhibit "B" Initial Study Part I and Part II Draft Resolution of ApproYal Development Code Amendment DRC2002-000875 I~o~thill Rival. Regional Related Commercial District Foothill Boulevard Districts, Subarea 4 Exhibit "A" Regional Related Commercial District Map ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Cit¥ofRanchoCucamonga (Part I - Initial Study) Planning Division (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the Cityns Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. * ~ .. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Project ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875. CITY OF Title: RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Districts). Name & Address of project N/A - Not Applicable owner(s): Name & Address of developer or project City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsor: 10500 Civic Conter Drfve, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Alan Warren, Associate Planner Address: 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number: (909)-477-2750 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Exhibit "B' o~./~5 DRC2002-8751S PT 1 .DOC - 4/96 Page 1 Information indicated by astedsk (*) is not required of non-construction CUPRs unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. N/A 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features lmm the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Along Foothill Boulevard wherever land is zoned Regional Related Commercial within the Regional Related Commercial Distdct 4) Assessors Pamel Numbers (altach additional sheet if Regional Related Commedcal propetfies within necessary): Subarea 4 of the Foothill Districts 229-031-27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, and48; 227-211-24, 25, and27; 227-221-01 and 02. *5) Gross Site Area (acJsq. ff.): N/A '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 68. 72 acres of Regional Related Commercial in Subarea 4 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: None 8)Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: A Conditional Use Permit approval by the City before any Public Storage facility can be developed. 9) Describe the physical setting o~ the s!te a~ it e~(ists before the proje?t including inform?ion ~n topography, soil stability, plants DRC2002-8751S PT 1 .DOC - 4/96 Page 2 and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage Courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all soumes of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and amheological surveys, traffic studies): Refer to the City's setting as descdbed in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Subarea 4 of the Foothill Dist#cts is located between the east side of the I- 15 Freeway and the City boundary along East Avenue. Retail commercial is the predominate land use pattern in this area of the communiiy with a significant regionally related shopping center on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): N/A 11) Descdbe any noise soumes and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: N/A 12) Describe the proposed I~ roject in detail. This should i~rovide an adequate descril)tion of the site in terms of ultimate use which DRC2002-8751S PT 1.DOC - 4/96 Page 3 will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The Development Code is proposed to be amended as follows shown on Exhibit 'A' of this study. A Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted in anticipation of approval of the Development Code Amendment authorizing such a process for public storage activities 13)Describe the surrounding properties, including informalion on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartreent houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): The site and surrounding properties aro developed with shopping centers and industrial uses to the south. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? NO. DRC2002-8751S PT 1.DOC - 4/96 Page 4 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including soume and amount. How will these noise levels affect ad acent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? No unique noises or excessive noise levels will be generated from a public storage facility. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None 18)Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987-2591. N/A a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. __ Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdct at 987- 2591. a. Residential (gal/day). N/A- The area is already developed with commercial uses and sewer imorovements. b. Commemial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot None size: DRC2002-8751S PT 1.DOC - 4/96 Page 5 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): None 21)Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: N/A Sale Prica(s) $. to $ Rent (per month) $. to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A 23)Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: N/A a. Elementary: n/a b. Junior High: n/a c. Senior High n/a COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: N/A 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A DRC2002-8751S PT 1 .DOC - 4/96 Page 6 27) Indicate houm of operation: N/A 28) Number of Total: N/A employees: n/a Maximum Shift: N/A Time of Maximum Shift: N/A 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: N/A '31) For commemial and industrial uses only, indicate the soume, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. N/A DRC2002-8751S PT 1.DOC - 4/96 Page 7 33)1n the known history of this properly, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCBIls; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. N/A 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appJication plans. N/A I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: //--IC~'0'-~.'''' Signature: _Z~/ ~ Title: Associate Planner DRC2002-8761S PT 1 .DOC - 4/96 Page 8 ATTACHMENT A N/a - Not applicable Water Usa,qe Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day CommerclaFIndustrlal General and Regional Commercial 3000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2,0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General Commercial 2000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 100-1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 9/86 DRC2002-8751S PT 1 .DOC - 4/96 Page 9 ATTACHMENT B N/a - Not Applicable Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 DRC2002-8751S PT 1 .DOC - 4/96 Page 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: DRC2002-00875 2. Related Files: DRC2002-00876 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District (Subarea 4), of Development Code Chapter-17.32 (Foothill Districts). 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center. Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: General Commemial 6. Zoning: Regional Related Commercial 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Along each side of Foothill Boulevard, east of the 1-15 Freeway. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Alan Warren, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None .255 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED · The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Public Services Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Utilities and Service Systems Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Aesthetics Water ( ) Hazards ( ) Cultural Resources Air Quality ( ) Noise ( ) Recreation ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed: / ~., A~,~,ssociate P--"~'~'n e r November 19, 2002 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. 1. ~ USE I~ND ~ Would the proposah a) Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) (x) zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ( ) (x) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the (x) ( ) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) (x) ( ) established community? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 3 Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: Pota31iadly Unless Than Comments: a),b) The code amendment proposal is to allow an additional commercial activity, Mixed Use Public Storage, in the Regionally Related Commemial District of Subarea 4 along Foothill Boulevard. The addition of another commercial use, one which is compatible with the general character of the uses allowed in the surrounding area will not present significant land use impacts. c),d) Public storage is typically not located in prime retail commercial sites, but with the City's design standards and the requirement that a portion of each project include commercial activities, the land use impact should be insignificant. 2. POPULATION AND HOLIS~G. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) housing? Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not impact housing and population figures. 3. GEOLOG~PROBLBVIS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: ( ) ( ) (x) a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (x) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) (x) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) (x) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) (x) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will affect the potential exposure to geologic hazards. .257 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~r~ M~ ~,~ ~o ~ncorpomted 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase impacts to water quality. There are no bodies of water in Subarea 4. 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to ( ) ( ) (x) an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) (x) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, ( ) ( ) (x) or cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase impacts to the area's air quality. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: .eternity Un~ ~,~ ~ml~ct inco~aed impact impact 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: ( ) (x) a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from desig.n features (e.g., ( ) (x) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to ( ) (x) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) (x) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or ( ) ( ) (x) bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) ( ) (x) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase impacts to the area's circulation. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: ( ) ( ) ) (x) a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, ( ) ( ) ) (x) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ) (x) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase impacts to biological resources. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~r~ M~o. ~r.=~t No I 'r~~t I,rl~or~x~e~ ,mFm~ 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: ( ) ( ) ( (x) a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( (x) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known ( ) ( ) ( (x) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase impacts to energy and minerals resources. 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) (x) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency ( ) _ ( ) (x) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) (x) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of ( ) ( ) (x) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) (x) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The addition of another commercial activity in the Regionally Related Commercial District in the form of public storage will not expose people to increases in potential hazards. 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase noise impacts. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875' Page 7 ~rnmct ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentieJly UnleSs 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) roads? e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase the need for public services, 12, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) a) Power or natural gas? b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not significantly increase demand for utilities. 13. AESTHETICS, Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) (x) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic ( ) (x) effect? c) Create light or glare? ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 8 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentta~y Unles~ man Comments: The addition of another commemial activity in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not affect the area's aesthetic consideration by implementation of the City's design policies and standards. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resoumes? ) (x) b) Disturb archaeological resoumes? ) (x) c) Affect historical or cultural resoumes? ) (x) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change ) (x) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ) (x) the potential impact area? Comments: The addition of another commemial activity in the Regionally Related Commemial District will not increase impacts to the area's cultural resoumes. 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal'. a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commercial District will not increase the need for recreation services. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 9 Issues and Supporting Information Soumes: potenlJaJly U~eSs man b) Short term: Does the project have the potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: The addition of another commercial activity (public storage) in the Regionally Related Commemial District will not increase any impacts that would normally be expected with all the other permitted uses within the district. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CECA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan EIR (Certified October 17, 2001 ) (x)Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2002-00875 Page 10 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: ..~~L------~,.__, Date: Print Name and Title: ~/-,~/,J City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DRC2002-00875 Public Review Period Closes: January 15, 2003 Project Name: Envirenmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment- DRC2002-00875 Project Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map): Within the Regional Related Commemial District (Subarea 4), along Foothill Boulevard. Project Description: A request to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commemial District (Subarea 4), of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Foothill Districts). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or preposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that ~n Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public Is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. January 15, 2003 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. 02-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE 'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PEP, MI'I-I'ED USE WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS SUBAREA 4, AS LISTED IN DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.32, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. DRC2002-00875, as described in the title ofthis Resolution. Hereinafferin this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of December 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have oCCUrred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamooga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 11, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City, primarily on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway and a small area on the north side of Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway; and b. Th& proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the information provided in Parts I and II of the Initial Study for this application that did not find any significant environmental impacts would result from the application proposal. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development by being located in the General commercial General Plan land use designation which specifies a "wide range of community commercial and regionally-oriented businesses" within the land use designation; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-124 DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11, 2002 Page 2 b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by complying with the intent of the Regional Related Commercial designation by providing complementary uses and development standards; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as evidenced by the environmental analysis in Parts I and II of the Initial Study for this application which determined that no significant impacts would results from this application; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code by protecting and promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare through the City's environmental and design review procedures as provided in the Initial Study and application report analysis; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the Regional Related Commercial designation is an accepted zone within the General Commercial General Plan land use designation and the Mixed Use Public Storage use advances the intent of the zone by adding to the wide-range of commercial activities. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Stata CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Deciaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. DRC2002-00875, to add Mixed Use Public Storage as a conditionally permitted use within the Regional Related Commercial District, Subarea 4, of Development Code Chapter 17.32, by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-124 DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11, 2002 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c/ ,,~_arry/M~,,~iel, C'h~irm'an ' ATTEST: I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of December 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, STEWART ORDINANCE NO.~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2002-00875 TO ADD MIXED USE PUBLIC STORAGE AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE REGIONAL RELAT.ED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS SUBAREA 4, AS LISTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.32, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On December 11, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 02-124, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On January 15, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on January 15, 2003, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City, primarily on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway and a small area on the north side of Foothill Boulevard east of the 1-15 Freeway; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the information provided in Part I and II of the Initial Study for this application that did not find any significant environmental impacts would result from the application proposal. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development by being located in the General Commercial General Plan land use designation which specifies a "wide range of community commercial and regionally-oriented businesses" within the land use designation; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 15, 2003 Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by complying with the intent of the Regional Related Commercial designation by providing complementary uses and development standards; and e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as evidenced by the environmental analysis in Part I and II of the Initial Study for this application which determined that no significant impacts would results from this application; and f. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code by protecting and promoting the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare through the City's environmental and design review procedures as provided in the Initial Study and application report analysis; and g. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the Regional Related Commercial designation is an accepted zone within the General Commercial General Plan land use designation and the Mixed Use Public Storage use advances the intent of the zone by adding to the wide-range of commemial activities. SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission and City Council during the public hearings, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 4: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures (additions in bold print), to allow subject to a conditional use permit, Mixed Use Public Storage in Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts, by amending Table 17.32.030 and adding footnote #5, as written below: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00875 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Janua~ 15,2003 Page 3 I Subarea One I Subarea Two I Subarea Tbrea I Subarea Four 1 Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080. F.7.b (footnote 2). 2 All indostdal usec and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. 3 Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. 4 Commemiai/Offica uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally relateq uses. Regionally Related Commemial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level. 5 Public Storage may be located In the RRC district only within an enclosed building. NO outdoor storage is permitted. The public storage use may occupy a portion of an existing retail building provided the building Is at least 50,000 square feet, · the public storage use does not occupy the first 100 foot depth of storefront leasable area, and the public storage use does not occupy more than 50 percent of the ground floor af the bulldthg. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general cimulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ,27/ THE CITY OF I~A ~ C I~ 0 CUCA~ONGA DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Membera of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP. - A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to 1 ) realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor, to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street; and 2) Change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium (LM) Residential for a 9-acre parcel located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map'SUBTT16157 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTr15724. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously recommends adoption of a Negativ~ Declaration of environmental impacts and the approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2003-00533 by adoption of the attached Ordinance. BACKGROUND: The proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment was initiated to amend the Trail alignment from that of a Trail Type D (which would meander through the developed area) between West Greenway Trail and Malaga Drive, to that of a street Trail E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street in the southeast quadrant of the Community Plan; and, to amend the land use designation of a 9-acre parcel from Elementary School to Low-Medium Residential (consistent the current General Plan Land use designation) in the northwest quadrant of the Community Plan. The amendment to the Trail alignment is driven by the design of the proposed Lewis Apartment Communities project, Tentative Tract 16157 (Homecoming), which is designed as a gated community. Therefore, the function of this portion of the trail had to be analyzed within the context of the public trail system in this quadrant of the Community Plan. The land use amendment of the 9-acre parcel in the northwest quadrant is driven by decisions made by the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP. January 15,2003 Page 2 Central School District, which resulted in declaring that this parcel was no longer required by the District. ANALYSIS: The attached Planning Commission staff report provides a detailed analysis of the proposed Community Plan Amendment. The proposed alignment of the Trail (Type E) along Terra Vista Parkway to Chumh Street and along Church Street to Milliken Avenue, maintains the overall cimulation pattern as envisioned by the Community Plan. The 9-acre site currently designated Elementary School (E), is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of Terra Vista. A Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment was approved in 1999 (Ord. 99-121) amending the Land Use Designation around the Coyote Canyon School (located on Elm Street) from Medium Residential to Elementary School in order to enlarge the school facilities at that location. Prior to the 1999 action by the City Council, the School District Board had amended the Terra Vista School Facilities Agreement, relinquishing · their option to purchase the site on Terra Vista Parkway. Therefore, the 9-acre site was relinquished by the School District in 1994, and at this time KB Home proposed a land use amendment that is compatible with the adjacent development. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment included the preparation of a Negative Declaration to address the proposed land use amendment. No mitigation was required for the land use amendment, as noted in the attached Ordinance. Brad Buller City Planner BB:DM/Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 23, 2002 Draft Ordinance Approving Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533 THE CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAMONCA DATE: O~ober 25, 2002 TO: Chairman and Membem of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planrler BY: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP. - A proposed amendment to the Term Vista Community Plan to realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor, to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street and to change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 9.05-acre parcel, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUB'V1'16157 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTI'15724. ANALYSIS: A. General: The first component of this proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment pertains to the trail segment associated with Tentative Tract Map SUB'I-F16'157, proposed by Lewis Apartment Communities. The Trail Type D segment in the Community Plan bisects this property, connecting the trail along Malaga Drive to the East Greenway Corridor and other destinations to the north. The project, referred to as Homecoming, as proposed by the Lewis Companies, is a gated community, which inherently made the trail alignment as portrayed in the Community Plan difficult to maintain. The applicant has proposed an alternative trail alignment surrounding the site as follows: to destinations north and east of the site, a Trail Type E will be developed along Church Street to Terra Vista Parkway then northerly to the East Greenway Corridor; and to destinations to the - west, the Trail Type E will be developed along Chumh Street to Milliken Avenue, connecting to the existing trail segments along Milliken Avenue. The proposed modifications to the trail system of the Community Plan maintain the overall circulation as envisioned in the original Community Plan. Internally from within the Homecoming project, access will be provided to the East Greenway Corridor, and later phases of the project will provide internal access directly to Milliken Park. As a result of this Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment, Lewis Operating Corp. should follow-up with a vacation of the trail easement along the north side of the storage properly, at which ti.me Planning and Engineering Division may release bonds and cash deposits that are 'being held to secure future trail improvements, had the trail connection been determined to be necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP. October 23, 2002 Page 2 The second part of the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724 proposed by KB HOME. This is the only remaining undeveloped pamel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential (LM), attached residential townhome development (LM), Coyote Canyon Park, Mountain View Apartments (MH), and an attached duplex- style single-family residential development (LM). A Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment was approved in 1999 (City Council Ordinance 99-121), enlarging the current Coyote Canyon school site on Elm Avenue from Medium Residential to Elementary School. This application now requests an amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan from Elementary School to Low-Medium Residential for the old Coyote Canyon School site on Mountain View Drive; therefore, thera is essentially no net change in the overall density within the Community Plan. The Central School District Board of Trustees approved Amendment No. 5 to the Terra Vista School Facilities Agreement on July 14, 1994 (copy of Board Agenda Item and Action included as Exhibit B). With the approval of this amendment, the School District relinquished their option to pumhase the site that had served as an interim location for Ruth Musser Middle School on Terra Vista parkway (the subject site) in return for an option to pumhase additional land adjacent to Coyote Canyon School from Lewis Development Company (then Lewis Homes). B. EnvirOnmental Assessment: The Initial Study Part II has been prepared for the project. The Initial Study and Notice of Intent were available for public review beginning October 1,2002. No mitigation measures were determined to be necessary as related specifically to the Terra Vista Community plan Amendment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the ~ Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533 to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Draft Resolution.  ed, City Planner BB:DM~ma Attachments: Exhibit mAU - Proposed Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment Exhibit mBu - Central School District Board of Trustees Agenda Item of July 14, 1994 Exhibit "C" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Terra Vista community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533 LAND USE AMENDMENT lUnaR ~R[~U~A¥ SYSTEM · · · · MAJOR GREENWA ~:~ M~OR GREENWA¥ REVISED TRAIL ALIGNMENT FIGURE 111-12 Park and Greenway System ................. ~ .Proposed Regional Trail Trail crosses Base Line at ~ ~cltywide) greater safety. Trails sllf~ with sldewallm for continuity. S.P.R... III ~ .^" IlL -- ~ TRAIL TYPE M LM NC M O PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS LM t, ~ ' ~ CONTINUOUS GREENWAY LM LM ~, LM (NO TRAFFIC CROSSINGS) EH LM ........ TRAILS · LM M Residents east of M t -- Terra Vista have easy access to the greenway . .H · ----- Striped blkelane on MFC MHO CC (~) -- ,' Rochester Avenue CC CC ....c...o,. T F ,' .P,_r'--I I' · ~ _~ ,,, ,,~' -.- -~ :OOT~-- ~ Greenway connoctlon Trail connections to employment center T~-aila generally cress m to Town Center and proposed Foothill transit route perimeter roads at Intersection8 tor greater pedeatrbn mdety )~,~ FIGURE IV-23 ..~Greenway System Design Features IV-15 ~ENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES' AGENDA ITEM ITLE: Approval of Amendment No. 5 to the Terra Vista School Facilities Agreement between Central School District and Lewis Homes EXPLANATION: With the execution of Amendment No. 5 to the original agreement Central School District entered into with Lewis Homes in 1984, Central school District agrees to vacate the currently leas~d Ruth Musser Middle School site by August 1, 1994, and to relinquish their option to purchase the 8.19 acre site. In fetus, Lewis Homes grants to Central School District an · option to purchase 3.6 acres of land adjacent to the Coyote Canyon ElementarySchool site with funds from the next issue of the previously-authorized general obligation bonds. Duringthe term of this option, Lewis Homes also grants Central School District a terminable license to use the site as a temporary parking lot. The revised Master certification of Adequacy of School · Facilities, which is part of the amendment, certifies to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the total number of residential units yet to be completed by Lewis Homes within Central school District boundaries will not exceed 1889 andthat Central School District will have adequate school facilities available to accommodate all students generated by the development of these units. As in the past, no developer fees will be collected for these future residential units and Central School District will continue to collect developer fees from Lewis Homes for any commercial and industrial development within the district boundaries. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Terra Vista School Facilities Agreement between Central school District and Lewis Homes and authorize Dr. Sonja Yates to sign any necessary documents "ubmltted by: ~, / Board Meeting Date: (// July 14, 1994 D-l?0 Rev. 4188,~/~/~ ~ 7 AHENDHENT NO. 5 TO TERRA VZSTA SCHOOL FACZLZTZES AGREEHENT This Amendment No. 5 to the Terra Vista School Facilities Agreement ("Amendment No. 5') Is made thls 15th day of July, 1994, by LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA and LE~IS DEVELOPMENT CO.,--~th. Callfornia general partnerships, and W[STER~ PROPERTIES, a California limited partnership (hereinafter, collecttvemy to as 'Lewis') and the CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, a publlc agency (hereinafter referred to as "District") and amends that certain Terra Vtsta School Facilities Agreement dated October 10, 1984, (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"), as prevfously amended. Except as specifically provtded herein, all terms defined in the Agreement and any Amendments (as deftned tn Recital B below) shall have the same meaning when used herein. A. Lewis and Otstrtct entered into the Agreement in order to provide for the .*.. financing and construction of school facilities tn connection with the development of Terra Vista. B. Lewis and Otstrtct have amended the Agreement on December 5, 1984, January 15, 1986, and February 1, 1989, and February 5, 1991 (collectively "Amendments"). The /unendment dated February 1, 1989 and the Amendment dated February 5, 1991 are hereinafter referred to as ~Amendment No. 3' and "Amendment No. 4,' respectively, and the Agreement as amended by all of the afo~ementfoned Amendments is hereinafter referred to as the · Agreement, as amended.~ C. Since the execution of Amendment No. 4, the District has had constructed the TV-2 School and the Intermediate School. Glven this and 1ts actual experience with student generation rates within Terra Vista over the last approximately ten years, the District has determined that, provtded Lewis grants to Oistrict an optton to purchase that certain real property consisting of approxlmately 3.6 acres adjacent to the western boundary of the existing TV-2 School, which real property is more particularly described on the document attached hereto as Exhlbtt "A' and ~ncorporated herein by reference (hereinafter ~3.6 Acre Site') on which Olstrtct may expand the TV-2 School, It shall have sufficient and adequate facilities for all students that have been generated to date and are anticipated to be generated from all residential, commercial and industrial development approved pursuant to the land uses and densities now permitted by the Terra Vtsta Community Plan, as It may be amended from time to time, (so long as the total number of residential units does not exceed that currently provided) and that District will not need either the TV-1 Interim School (as defined below) or the permanent school originally planned to be built at the TV-1 School site. Accordingly, District and Lewis hereby desire to acknowledge that, except as expressly specified below, no other mitigation measures are now, or, hereafter, shall be required of Lewis in connection with development of any nature within Terra Vista pursuant to the Terra Vista Community Plan. D. District has and will have adequate school facilities for all students generated from development within Terra Vista without the TV-1 Interim Amendment No. 5 to ...a Vista School Facillties Ag, Jnt Page 2 School and, accordingly, in consideration of the grant of the option to purchase the 3.6 Acres, Oistrict desires to abandon, terminate and reconvey to Lewis any rights, title or interests that it may have tn the TV-! Interim School, the 8.19 Acre Site and the 7.85 Acre Site. HOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, Lewis and District agree to amend further the Agreement, as amended, as follows: 1. Substitution of Option Property. The "Option Property" referred to in Paragraph 16 of Amendment No. 4 shall, hereafter, refer to the 3.6 Acre Site and Oistrict and Lewis hereby expressly revoke and terminate any rights, including but'not limited to any option rights, that District maY have to acquire the 8.19 Acre Site or the 7.85 Acre Site referred to in Paragraph 16 of Amendment No. 4 and more particularly described in those documents attached thereto as Exhibits 'E' and "G'. Accordingly, concurrently with the execution of this Amendment No. 5, Oistrtct shall . execute and acknowledge a quitclaim deed for the 8.19 Acre Site and the ' 7.85 Acre Site. 2. Term of Option. Oistrict's option to purchase the Option Property (now the 3.6 Acre Site descrlbed on Exhibit "A") shall expire on the first to occur of either (i) December 31, 1998, or (tl) on the date thtrty (30) days after the District's next lssuanceof gqneral obligation bonds. 3. Exercise of Option and Purchase Price. The manner in which the Otstrtct shall exercise the option and the determination of the purchase price shall remain as set forth in Paragraph 16 to Amendment No. 4. wled ement of Lewis' Full Performance. 01strict acknowledges and 4. ~y certifies that, with the exception of Lewis' ag~eme~t ~ereln to install the off-site improvements required by the City OT Kancno ~ucamonga for occupancy of the Intermediate School, the future payment of fees in connection with commercial and industrial development pursuant to Paragraph 7 of Amendment No. 3, and the payment of taxes resulting from any District-wide general obligation bond, Lewis either has fulfilled or is hereby relieved of all obligations required of it under the Agreement,. as amended. Accordingly, Lewis shall have no further obligations or responsibilities for the mitigation of the school facility impacts of its development within District pursuant to the land uses and densities now permitted by the Terra Vista Community Plan, as it may be amended from time to time, (so long as the total number of residential units does not exceed that currently provided} whether such obligations may have arisen or in the future arise pursuant to the Agreement, as amended and any applicable laws, including but not limited to, the Act, the Greene Program, the Regulations, or any other fee, tax (excluding any District- wide general obligation bond}, or mitigation measure existing or hereafter enacted. Specifically, District agrees that Lewis shall have no further obligations to provide any additional relocatable classrooms pursuant to Paragraph g of Amendment No. 4 and that the Capacity Certification (Exhibit "D" to Amendment No. 4} shall be revised to include the additional tracts within the District's portion of the Terra Vista Community Plan, not previously referred to in the Capacity Certification, for which Lewis was previously obligated to provide relocatable classrooms pursuant to the aforementioned Paragraph g of Amendment No. Concurrently herewith, Oistrict shall execute, for the purposes of Lewis' Amendment Ho. 5 to .... a Vista School Facilities Ag,~. ~nt Page 3 submittal to the City, the revised Capacity Certification attached hereto as Exhibit 5. Abandonment of TV-1 Interim School. District hereby agrees to vacate and abandon the TV-1 interim school and all real property, improvements, structures, and fixtures used in connection therewith, including, but not limited to the relocatable classrooms and playground equipment located thereon (collectively TV-1 I~terim School), on oK-before August 1, 1994, and to leave the same in a good, clean and debris free condition. District hereby agrees that its existing license to Use the TV-1 Interim School granted pursuant to Paragraph 10 of the Agreement and any other rights that it may have with respect to the TV-1 Interim School, is hereby terminated and that Lewis is free to use the TV-1 Interim School for whatever purposes that it desires. District warrants and represents that it has not encumbered, conveyed, or transferred any interest in the TV-! Interim School. Oistrict also hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify . and hold Lewis harmless from and against any anU all costs, expenses, ' damages, liabilities, actions, or causes of action, including but not '." limited to remediatton costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of the release or disposal by Oistrict of hazardous materials, substances, waste, toxic substances, contamination, and pollution upon the TV-! Interim School, giving those terms the broadest meaning as accorded by statutes, regulations and/or court decisions. 6. Interim Use of 3.6 Acre Site. During the term of the Option for the 3.6 Acre Site, Lewis shall gran: to District a terminable license to use the 3.6 Acre Site as a parking lot, provided that it paves such site, pursuant to paving plans first approved, in writing, by Lewis, which approval may be withheld in Lewis' absolute discretion. Oistrict shall maintain the 3.6 Acre Site, keep it lien free and in the event that it fails to exercise its Option to purchase it, shall if requested by Lewis, in writing, remove all pavement and restore ~t to substantially the same condition that it was in at the time of the execution of this Amendment No. §. District hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold Lewis, its affiliated entities, including, but not limited to Lewis Homes Management Corp., a California corporation, and each of their officers, agents, employees, parents, partners, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, and each of them (collectively "Lewis') from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses, actual attorneys' fees, losses, and liabilities, at law or in equity, of every kind and nature (collectively, 'Claims') whatsoever, arising directly or indirectly out of, in connection with, or relating to t~e entry onto, use of, or operations on or about the 3.6 Acre Site by Oistrict, its contractors, agents, employees, and the public at large. District shall, at District's own cost, expense, and risk,'{a) defend all Claims as defined above that may be brought or instituted by any party against Lewis~ (b) pay and satisfy any judgment or decree that may be rendered against Lewis arising out of any such Claims~ and {c) pay all damages incurred by Lewis including, but not limited to, any and all property damages and legal expenses incurred by Lewis in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity granted herein. Additionally, District shall, at all times, maintain in full force and effect with respect to the 3.6 Acre Site, the insurance coverage referred to in Paragraphs lO{d) through (gl of the Agreement. District's obligation to indemnify Lewis, as set forth above, shall survive the termination of the License granted herein. jg/ ~endment No. 5 to lu,-~. Vista School Facilities Agreu,,~,,t Page 4 7. Amendment Ho. 5 Supersedes Agreement as Amended. The tems and conditions ~this ~endment No. $ sh~l supersede the L~ms and conditions of the Agreement, as amended. The Agreement, as amended, shall, in all other respects remain in full force and effect and shall govern the rights, duties and liabilities of the Parties to each other with regard to the subject matter thereof; said Agreement, as amended, being expressly incorporated herein by reference. 8. Resolution of District Board. By its execution of this ~endment No. §, District represents and warrants that all tems and provision hereof have been approved by resolution of its Board of Trustees, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Oistrict and Lewis have duly executed this ~endment No. 5 as of the day and year first above written. "Lewis' 'Oistrict" L~IS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, CENT~L SCHOOL 01STRICT OF a California general partnership SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, a public agency It ize t By: LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO., Authorized Ag a California general partnership By: ~ APPROVED ~ TO FO~ AND CONTENT BY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS: WESTERN ~ND PROPERTIES, DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL a Califo.rnia limited partnership Michelle Blak_em~.~ ~: LEWIS HOMES ~,AGE,ENT CORP., By: a California corporation General Partner J~:vh\gg3: 070594 July 5, 1994 Mr. Rick Gomez city of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re= Master Certification of Adequacy of school Facilities Dear Mr. Gomez~ T~e 'Central School District of San Bernardino (-District") hereby , ' a Lewis Development Co., and wes=em ~an~ Callforni , ....... ~=A ~ of tha= certain Terra Ca£1~or~*~= ~ _ .-~ .......... ~ as amended, adequate Vista school ~acl£1=les es ca able of accommodating all students generate~ faoiliti . ~ ....... = ...... osed residential projects wzthln ~e Te~ra vista Master Planned communl:y w~a~ Tentative Tract No. Nu e of U its 13351-SFA/SFD 126 41 14365-SFD 157 14368-MF 13717-SFA 384 393 13859-MF 14803-SFA 95 15125-MF 328 15526-SFD 62 15537-SFA 175 PM 8842 (TV-1 site) 128 TOTAL 1,889 ' er certification is valid to allgw specific plan This mast .... ==~--~ use ~ermlts, tentative and amendments, zone ~nanges, =unu~u~u.L~~ ~s~ance of building and a royals, as well au u~= .... . final map PP ............ ,~. ~ve-desl~nated tracts and ~e ~ni~s%herein, without any additional =e:u~ District or mitigation measures whatsoever. Tentative tract numbers, designations, or the number of units within each tentative tract may be adjusted provided that the total particular · . · number of units to which this master certification applies does not exceed 1,937. Mr. Rick GomeZ July 5, 1994 Page 2 This master certification is, and shall hereafter be, effective as to the total number of units referred to above, except in the event that District provides you with a Court Order issued by the San Bernardino County Superior Court, staying its effectiveness. Very truly yours, CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY By: Sonja ~ F. XHIBIT B ' City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 2. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15724 (SUBTT15724), KB HOME -A proposed Tentative Tract Map consisting of 1 lot for condominium purposes and I lettered lot for ingress/egress, on 9.05 acres of land, within the Low-Medium Residential Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken Avenue and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077-831-32. Related File DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00381 - KB HOME - The i-eview of detailed Site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 15724,' consisting of 78 single-family detached condominium units on 9.05 acres in the Low-Medium Residential Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan with an actual project density of 8.6 dwelling units per acre, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway between Milliken AvenUe and Spruce Avenue. APN: 1077-831-32. Related File: SUBTT15724. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN. AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME OF GREATER LOS ANGELES AND LEWIL; OPERATING CORP. - A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to t) realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor, to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street; and 2) Change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium Density (LM) Residential for a 9.05-acre parcel located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related Files: 1) SUBTI'16157 and 2) SUB'I-r15724. 3, Project Sponsor's Name and Address: KB HOME Greate~r Los Angeles, Inc. 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201 Pomona, CA 91768-2641 4. General Plan Designation: Low-Medium (6-8 dwelling units per acre). 5. Zoning: Terra Vista Community Plan - Ex stin.q Elementary School - Proposed Low- Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential referred to as "Calais" (Tract 12671-LM) and an attached residential townhome development referred to as "Seville" (Tract 15725 - LM) along the east boundary; a single-family subdivision referred to as "Oxford" (Tract 12802 - LM) on the south side of Mountain View Drive; Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (MH) along the west boundary; and on the north side Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 2 of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style single-family residential development referred to as '~/illa Capd" (Tract 13192 - LM). The north and south boundaries of the site are formed by Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Ddve respectively, that include curb and gutter. The site slopes gently from north to south at a 2 percent gradient. There are no trees or significant yegetation left on the site due to years of disking and weed control. 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8. Contact Person and Phone Number: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. I(x)Land Use and Planning (X) Transportation/CirculaUon ( ) Public Services ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Biological Resources (x) Geological Problems ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources (() ) AestheficsUfilities and Sen/ice Systems ( ) Hazards II (x) Water ( ) Cultural Resources Il(x) Air Quality (x) Noise ( ) Recreation (x) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. {X} I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared for SUBTT15724/DRC200'I-00381; and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared for the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533. Debra Meier, AICP Contract Planner September 24, 2002 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~t ~,~,,~. a~=~ ,~ ~t~ ~ ~ I m~ I ~ , L~D I~E ~iO PI_~ININ~ Would the ~opo~l: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (X) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (X) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) established community? Comments: a-d) The 9 acre site was originally intended to be the site of Coyote Canyon Elementary School, and in fact a temporary school, comprised of completely modular structures, was one time located on the site. However, in 1999 Lewis Companies submitted an amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan (City Council Res. No. 99-121) to enlarge their parcel on Elm Avenue, creating a larger school site at this location. That Community Plan Amendment changed the land use of the parcel from Medium Density Residential to Elementary School. This action essentially combined the two separate elementary school sites in the west half of Terra Vista, to a larger site that better suits the needs of the School District. The property on Mountain View is no longer required by the District as a school site. Tentative Tract 15724 is the only remaining undeveloped parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Land uses on either side of the site include single-family residential (Tract 12671-LM) and an attached residential townhome development (Tract 15725 - LM) along the east boundary; and, Coyote Canyon Park and Mountain View Apartments (MH) along the west boundary. On the north side of Terra Vista Parkway is an attached duplex-style single-family residential development (Tract 13192 - LM), and on the south side of Mountain View Drive is a single-family residential neighborhood referred to, as Oxford (Tract 12802 - LM). The site has a general plan designation of Low-Medium Density residential, and a proposed Terra Vista Community Plan designation of Low-medium density residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); however, the actual project density is 8.6 dwelling units per acre. This flexibility in density is permitted in the Terra Vista Community Plan subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. The proposed project is designed in conformance with all applicable standards and guidelines of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 2. POPULATION .N~ID I-K:XJSIN~ Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (X) population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly ( )' ( ) ( ) (X) or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) housing? Comments.'. a-c) Construction activities will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed subdivision will result in new residents to the area; however, the proposed density of development has been anticipated since the adoption of the Terra Vista Community Plan in 1983. The site is void of existing structures and will not impact existing housing units. The Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment approved in 1999 (Council Ordinance 99-121), enlarging the current Coyote Canyon school site on Elm Avenue, was a amendment from Medium Residential to Elementary School, therefore the is no net change in the overall density within the Community Plan based on the current Community Plan Amendment from Elementary School to Low-Medium Density Residential. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil (). () (.) (X) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 · Page 5 i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-c) No known earthquake faults pass through the site; it is not in an Alquist-Pdolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault passes within approximately 1% miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4% miles northerly. These faults are both capable of produdng Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is approximately 14 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing Mw8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. The site is located on stable soils, which are typically not subject to liquefaction. Adherence to the Uniform Building Code will ensure the geologic impacts are less than significant on residential construction. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e-f) The site has a relatively gentle grade, so landslides or mudflows are not likely to occur and grading will be required only to create proper drainage and development of appropriate building pad areas. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tujunga soil association. These soils are typically excessively drained, moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans. They are relatively stable, but are subject to liquefaction when the water table is shallow. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Building and Safety Division will require a soils report. The impact.is not considered significant. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ? ~ 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related . () () () (X) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (X) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) water movements? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 P, age 6 f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (X) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? . ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) i)- Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) othei'wise available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns. The site slopes gently from north to south at approximately 2 percent gradient. The City Engineer must approve a drainage study, indicating how storm water will be directed to the existing storm drains in the immediate area, prior to issuance of grading permits. The State of California is authorized to administer vadous aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity that causes the disturbance of five acres or more. The General Construction permit requires recipients to reduce or eliminate non-storm water discharges into storm water systems, and to' develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region has issued an area-wide NPDES Storm Water Permit for the County of San Bemardino, the San Bemardino County Flood Control District, and the incorporated cities of San Bemardino County within the Santa Ana Region. The City then requires implementation of measures for a project to comply with the area-wide permit raquirements. The SWPPP will include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction of the project to pollute surface waters. This is a standard condition of approval applicable to this project. BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant: 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that identifies BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the Building Official. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the project by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant. b) The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain. City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 7 c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. f-i) The project will not alter the course or direction of groundwater, nor have any contact with groundwater which would impact groundwater quality. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (X) cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-b) The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. The criteria pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM~o). Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors. Construction Emissions Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary [Pounds per Da)') Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Grading 2.95 2.95 38.86 36.92 - 13.62 6.54 Worker Trips 0.23 0.23 0.33 0.33 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.06 Stationary Equip. 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 - 0.02 0.02 Mobile Equip. 3.46 3.29 31.00 29.45 2.30 2.19 Arch. Coatings 62.48 59.36 Asphalt 0.35 0.33 Totals 69.81 66.35 70.46 66.97 0.62 0.62 16.00 8.81 SCAQMD Thres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM~0 and NOx dudng grading activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 8 conditions (operational impacts) for NOx. Table 1 shows project impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. During grading, fugitive dust (PM~o) will be generated. To ensure PM~0 is below a significant level the following measures shall be implemented: 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3. Terra Vista Parkway shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may Vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~0 emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. Operations Emissions The operational mobile source emissions were 'calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tdp Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the residential nature of the proposed project, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium/heavy duty diesel ~'ucks. The project post- construction emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM~0), and since single-family homes surround the site, mitigation measures will be used to minimize the project contribution to regional emission of criteda pollutants. Table 2 Operations Emissions (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Unmit. Mit. Area Source 3.86 3.86 0,59 0.55 0.25 0;23 0.00 0.00 Mobile Source 9.60 9.19 6.79 6.44 79.40 75.25 3,77 3.57 Totals 13.46 13.05 7.38 6.99 79.65 75,48 3,77 3,57 SCAQMD Thres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Significant? No No No No No No No No Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 9 During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NOx and PM~0 levels in the area. Since single-family residences surround the site, the following mitigation measures will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels. 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on Iow emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in Table 2, post-construction activities at the site will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6a edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle trips associated with a designated land use. The proposed project includes the construction of 78 single-family detached condominium units. Based on the number of units and residential land use, the ITE associates a trip rate of 6.76 trips per day per dwelling unit. Approximately 527 trips are associated with the project. This amount of traffic is minimal and will generate 75.25 pounds of CO emissions per day. Emissions associated with these vehicle trips are below SCAQMD thresholds (Table 2). c-d) The proposed project is not of the size, scope, or nature to generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: a~ ~ ~ "~ 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby ) ( ) ( ) (X) uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ) ( ) ( ) ' (X) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ) ( ) ( ) (X) altsmative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 10 g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-f) The proposed single-family residential subdivision will generate approximately 780 trips per day (an average of 10 trips per day per household). The project is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan master plan street improvements and related facilities in the immediate area. At the time of building permit issuance, the applicant is required to pay Traffic Impact Fees as established by the City Coundl to offset the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. g) Located over 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is northerly of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. Issues.and Supporting Information Sources: ~x,,,~y ~ 'n~ 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (X) habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., hedtage trees, ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?· c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal () () () (X) pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comment.s.; a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984 and annual weed and erosion control measures have been undertaken annually since that time. b-c) Although previously in vineyard cultivation, the site was graded to a "super-pad" condition in 1984 when much of Terra Vista was rough graded. There are no existing trees or structures on the site. d) There are no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The site is undeveloped. However, development in the vicinity has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposab a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) - ( ) (X) resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? .Comments: a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The site is not designated by Stat, e Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 AND Table IV-l; therefore, there is no impact. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a-e) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses other than the prior vineyard cultivation. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils are observed. There is no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping or refuse on-sita. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 12 Issues and SuppoSing Information Sources: $i~gr~,3l Mi,~§O~l 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) Comments: a-b) The proposed project will not produce any noticeable long-term noise impacts, as the site is proposed for residential subdivision, which is consistent with development in the surrounding area. Construction of the proposed project would potentially result in relatively high noise levels and annoyance at the closest residences. The following measures, as required by the Development Code, would reduce shore-term construction-related noise impacts associated with the proposed project: 9. During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 10. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. '11. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 12. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise level to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 13 e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-e) _Fire Protection - The site, located on Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway, will be served by a fire station located near Baseline Road east of Day Creek Channel or Milliken Avenue near Banyan Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approval of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes are placed upon project approval. Police Protection - The proposed residential subdivision will incrementally increase {he need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee schedule adopted by the City Council. Schools. - The proposed project is located within the Terra Vista Community, which Pas agreements with the affected school districts to fund school construction. Parks - The proposed project is located within the Terra Vista Community, which has a Park Implementation Agreement approved by the City Council, through which park sites are developed for the entire Community Plan area. Public Facilities - The proposed residential subdivision would incrementally increase traffic on adjacent streets, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General . Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~.~.. ,a~:~ No t2. UTILITIES AND S£RVICE SYSTEMS, Weuld t~e proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution. () () () (X) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-g) The proposed residential subdivision will include the construction of 78 single-family residences. The proposed development will extend as necessary existing utility into the site as a condition of development. The proposed project will not require major modification or alterations to the existing utility infrastructure in immediate area. City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 14 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? . ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Comments,;. a-b) The proposed residential subdivision is located adjacent to Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive and must be developed in conformance with the landscape and streetscape guidelines of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The residential structures have previously received City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review Committee approval, as the proposed dwellings are identical to those used in Tract 16264 on Mountain View Drive east of Milliken. c) The proposed project development will increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. Due to the nature of existing residential and commercial development in the area surrounding the site, the impacts of light/glare will not be significant. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~.~r, ~,~a,. a~ .o 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Disturb amhaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () () () (X) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) potential impact area? Comments: a-e) Although no cultural resources have been observed during previous grading and site maintenance, additional grading on the site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources. As the site is approximately 9 acres in size and the surrounding area has previously been developed, the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is minimal and impacts are, therefore, considered to be less than significant. In the event that any such resources are discovered, the contractor will be required to contact the owner of the site and the San Bernardino County Museum for the proper recovery, removal, or documentation. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 15 Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: 15. RECREATION. Would the proposah a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) The proposed residential subdivision of 78 single-family homes Will incrementally increase the use of existing parks within Terra Vista. However, a Park Implementation Agreement was adopted by the City Council, which sets standards for park development within Term Vista. b) The proposed subdivision is located near Coyote Canyon Park, immediately adjacent to the proposed development. The proposed project will not negatively impact the use or enjoyment of any of the existing parks within Terra Vista or the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s~,=.t ~u~ ~c=~ "~ I mpa~ nca'pora ed ~mpact rn~c~ 16, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade; Does the project have the () () () (X) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () () (X) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 16 d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (X) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984. At that time, the vineyard was removed and the site was graded to a "superpad" condition. Annual erosion and weed control measures have been undertaken annually since that time. There are no existing trees or structures remaining on the site. b) The project site is approximately 9 acres in size and grading will entail establishing proper drainage and residential building pads suitable for future single-family development. Although the short-term construction activities may result in dust and noise, which may be noticeable to existing residents in the immediate area, significant impacts are avoided through implementation of erosion control and dust suppression measures. c) The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required.. d) The proposed development on 9 acres would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The site is proposed as Low-Medium Density Residential parcel along Terra Vista Parkway, west of Milliken Avenue. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15724/DRC2001-00381 and DRC2002-00533 Page 17 · EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures 'based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (X) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR - City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (X)General Plan - City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified FebnJary 16, 1983) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I cer[~ that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. ~~-~~ D Signaturs.:~.~- ate: /43/~~ Print Nar~ and Title: RESOLUTION NO. 02-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533 TO REALIGN THE TRAIL TYPE D BETWEEN MALAGA DRIVE AND WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR, TO A TRAIL TYPE E ALONG TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND CHURCH STREET AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (E) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM) FOR A 9.05-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARI~ AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. KB HOME and Lewis Operating Corp. jointly filed an application for Terra VIsta Community Plan Amendment No. DRC2002-00533, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Terra VIsta Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution.. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Terra VIsta Community Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-95 TVCPA DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP October 23, 2002 Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;, and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Term Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Deciaretion with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the facts associated with the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. o. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning commission during the public hearing, the Planning commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. DRC2002-00533 as shown in the attached Exhibit "Al." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ~..amJ ~)(AcNiel, Chairman A'I-I'E~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-95 TVCPA DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP October 23, 2002 Page 3 I, Bred Bullet, Secreta~J of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MACIS · LAND USE AMENDNIENT ~ ~AJOR GREEN~NAY Iii SYSTEM m. ~ NIAJOR GREENWF ~ gAdOR GREENW^¥ PN~IAL DEDICATION OF UNIUPROVED LA~D REVI$£D TR^II ALIGNNIENT FIGURE: 111-12 Park and Oreenway System .~.o.. ~.D ~soca, r.s ,.~' .... ~:.,.~.ktkll.tCl.,,ra~tt.t9 awn 071fl~002 03:40:52 PM, SC City Cucamonga of Rancho NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for. public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533 Public Review Period Closes: January 15, 2003 Project Name: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment Project Applicant: KB Home of Greater Los Angeles and Lewis Operating Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Terra Vista Community Plan (see project description). Project Description: A proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan to realign the Trail Type D between Malaga Drive and West Greenway Corridor, to a Trail Type E along Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street, and to change the land use designation from Elementary School (E) to Low-Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 9.05-acre parcel, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway east of Coyote Canyon Park. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16157 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15724. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and Is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration reeans that an Environmental irepact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are a~/ailable for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. January 15, 2003 Date of Determination Adopted By AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00533, A REQUEST TO REALIGN THE TRAIL TYPE D BETWEEN MALAGA DRIVE AND WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR, TO A TRAIL TYPE E ALONG TERRA VISTA PARK~NAY AND CHURCH STREET; AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (E) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM) FOR A 9.05-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY EAST OF COYOTE CANYON PARK, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. KB HOME and Lewis Operating Corp. jointly filed an application for Terre Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 15th day of January 2003, the City Council of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on January 15, 2003, including written and orel staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property within Terre Vista Community Plan; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2002-00533 - KB HOME AND LEWIS OPERATING CORP. January 15,2003 Page 2 a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, this Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of this Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the facts associated with the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, this Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to this Council dudng the public hearing, the Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2002-00533 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. LAND USE AMENDMENT IMAJOR GREENWA¥ SYSTEM eeee MMOR GREENWA ~ MAJOR GREENWAY RI_WIS£D IRAIL ALIGNMENT ~ FIGURE 111-12 "~ Park and Greenway System R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~GINI~E~IN G DEPAI~T~IENT S Repor DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer SUBJECT: NOISE LEVELS ON THE 210 FREEWAY While we are all pleased the new 210 Freeway is now operational many residents in the community have been surprised by the intensity of noise generated by the new facility. Many residents have contacted both staff and Caltrans requesting sound studies be made to verify the modeling work that was done prior to the construction of the freeway. This issue has been before the Route 30 Task Force on several occasions with residents requesting mitigation such as new walls, landscaping or some other measure that might help mitigate the noise problem. In response, staff has contacted Caltrans who has agreed to conduct new noise studies on the freeway. This information will be helpful to'ascertain whether or not the modeling work was accurate. The studies can also help to identify locations where future mitigation may be appropriate. · We have identified specific areas for Caltrans to take a look at based on requests from citizens. Those areas are the north side of the freeway from Beryl to Hermosa, Haven Avenue and Lemon and the area between Etiwanda and Day Creek'Boulevard. On the south side the areas between Milliken and Rochester and East Avenue to 1-15 Interchange will be reviewed. In general, we are asking Caltrans to review the entire freeway where there is not already sound protection so the areas defined above are not the only areas that may be looked at. Caltrans has indicated the study will start around the first of February and be completed by April 1. 2003. Aisc, we have requested notification when the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NOISE LEVELS ON THE 210 FREEWAY January 15 2003 Page 2 sound readings will be taken. Several residents have expressed concerns that noise levels at certain times of the day and weekends are greater than at other times. Caltrans indicates the studies are timed for the peak noise condition. As this process moves forward, staff will be working with Caltrans to determine what the sound levels are along the new freeway. This information will be brought back to City Council. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:dlw Z// Introduction · David Burchfield, 9801 Caldaro Street (Barossa Place) · Area of concern: Freeway noise along Highland Ave, from Hermosa to Beryl. - Intend to argue that the linear park concept be pushed forward. - Will also argue that the park should have a soundwall, and that Caltrans should have known that years ago. - There are now data to support this claim. · ASK QUESTIONS! (I don't mean to be confusing, it just happens .... ) Segment 3 Soundwal!! Overview · $oundwalls throughout Segment 3 should have been built: - Actual sound levels are significantly higher than predicted. - Actual wall efficiency higher than predicted. - Sound level model (Sound32) has unquantified uncertainties Caltrans did not address when specifically pressed by the Rte30 Task Force 3 years ago. · Walls should be built at the crown of the berm above the freeway. - NOW, not 2 or more years from now. · Excess right of way should be ceded over NOW for the linear park. - Delay hurts property values, tax revenues. · We suffer a real loss despite 3 years of effort to enlighten Caltrans and SanBAG staff. It's time Rancho Cucamon~la asked them to come forward and remedy the situation. History · Freeway sold to impacted communities with noise abatement; sound walls identified along entire route. · Sound Study: Segments of the wall were deemed unnecessary or, worse, necessary but ineffective. - On 3 Feb, 2000, 'Segment 3' soundwalls deleted, without public review of study findings. - Effective prior to Rancho Cucamonga Engineering review. · October 2001, Rte30 Task Force, with SanBAG and Caltrans, developed 'linear park' concept,.with 6' garden wall. - Shifted nearly $200,000 cost of the wall - here a garden wall - onto Rancho. The required soundwall should be paid from Freeway monies. - Caltrans is now hedging on how much land to 'reserve' for service access. · Any setback severely limits effectivity of any wall built. · Linear park vanishes if the wall is moved toward the street. · While they dicker, we suffer. - Rancho Cucamonga, and its homeowners, get to shoulder costs that should have been borne by Caltrans. Forever. What Ca[tran s Looks, For: · IF estimated sound levels approach, meet, or exceed 65 dBA, Caltrans MUST consider mitigation. · IF increase over current ambient noise is >_12 dBA, MUST consider. · Noise barrier height MAY NOT exceed 4.9m (16'). · MUST be able to block.line of sight (place barrier to block noise from truck exhaust, 11.5' above road.) · SHOULD provide at least 5dBA abatement. Highway Design Manual, ¶1102.3-1102.5 Other Requirements: · Per Caltrans Rte30 Task Force Rep.: - $oundwall location optimized for raised/lowered freeway. · Nominally. at ed.qe of right of way, alternately 30' from traveled lanes. (1102.4) -Needs to be placed to blocR line of sight to truck exhaust stacks. - $oundwall study ignored impact of the El Rancho Grande retaining wall as 'negligible'. (It's not.) · What we now know: - $oundwall location was NOT optimized - only considered at the edge of the Caltran$ right-of-way, not at crown of the hill above freeway where it could block truck noise. - Traffic noise reflected from El Rancho Grande retaining wall is not negligible - vehicle noise doubles near it. - Nominal peak traffic hour between 5 and 7AM invokes a 'penalty' of 10dB (Ld~) when evaluating noise. Not done. Barossa Place Pa rticu !la rs, Sound32 · Two locations were modeled. - 59035: near Archibald overpass. - 59036: other side of community entrance. · Both saw >12 dB increase over current noise, with sound levels estimated at or near 67dBA Leq. - This is at 5AM, corresponding to Ldn of 77dB. - Actual noise increase to > 70 dBA, (> 80 dBA Ldn). · One derives some benefit (4dB) from sound wall, other shows only a 1dB 'benefit'. - Both 'benefits' with wall at a decidedly non-optimum location. - This 'oops' shifts the burden of the freeway off the users and onto Rancho Cucamonga, and at a time when the state is cutting city funds. - 16' wall, properly located, provides twice that 5dB benefit. SANBAG Rte 30 Sound Study, document number 097-99 Commissioned to Wieland Associates performed by Moffett and Nichol, Engineers New Math no sou nd wa II · IF the study had estimated a 20% higher noise level attenuation at station 59036, Caltrans would have required a sound wall. - What does their model show with a wall in the right place? · Data collected last week say the wall is 10dB effective! - What reason, other than a desire not to pay for the wall, do they give for not asking that question? - Why was the 5AM noise impact not considered when traffic patterns on Rtes 10 and 210 were already known? · The failure of an engineering firm to think should not be an acceptable excuse for SanBAG or Caltrans to stiff Rancho Cucamonga. - Caltrans and SanBAG may have liked the result, but it was a wrong result and they were charged to know it. - When we addressed precisely these issues in 2000, responsible individuals did not do their jobs and challenge the study. Sound32 Model Data Sound32 IVlodel Data Highland Ave. 'Linear Park' (Assuming Caltrans cedes the land over... Geometry is ]:mportant. Retaining wall ........ at El Rancho Grande ........... 456 m · Wall must be located at the crown above the freeway to be effective. - 60' off the crown, a 16' wall cannot limit direct line of sight. Model 'discovered' this. · El Rancho Grande retaining wall is great at reflecting road noise above the berm. · Truck noise at 11.5' is already 'line-of-sight'. - If you can see it, you can hear it. Well. Sound32 Mode! Results ~-ReCe ver Sound Walt Refem~e EO~at on Base E Ex st ng Future Height I 2.~4,,m 3.0.,m, 3 7,,m, 4 3~ 4.9,m, Noise Level Reduction at I, I Xm I XdB I Leqlds (8 (10) (12) (14) (16) RecommendedHei~lht North Side between Amethyst Street and Archbald A venue 470:i 51 62 none 62 62 I 62 I 62 I 62 I 0dBfor4.gmwall 63 none 63 63 I 63 I 62 I 62 I ldBfor4.gmwall 51 63 none 64 63 I 63 ] 62 I 61 I 2dBfor4.9rnwall 63 none 64 63 63 62 61 2 dB for 4.9m wall 51 63 none 63 63 63 62 62 1 dB for 4~9m wall betWeen Archbald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue 52 64 1 dB for 4.9rn wall 52 65 4 dB for 4.9m wall 52 65 3 dB for 4.9m wall 2 dB for 4.9rn wall SW 164~ South of Freeway 71 I ri°ne I 68 I 67 I 66 I 65 I 64 I 5 71 none 68 I s? I 66I 64 I 64 I 5 72 1~5m 70 68 67 66 65 5 · Soundwall modeled 'effective' east of Highland Church (site 59038). - Walk 200' between Hermosa and Vineyard JHS. That wall is 10dB 'effective'! - Discarded wall west of Hermosa for 'cost effectiveness'. · Estimated only 1 house would benefit - ignored other homes of Cambridge and Elmhurst. · Since those communities have line of sight into the ditch, noise 'bathes' both streets. · Had 59036 shown a 5db 'benefit' the wall would be required. · 59036 (and 59035) do not show 5dB only because: - 1) The wall was misplaced - needed to be at the crown of the hill. Caltrans knows this. - 2) The math has no precision - the wall at VJHS is 100% more effective than modeled, · Nowhere is the 5-7AM peak noise, Ldn, evaluated. Real!it¥ Check: · Sound32 grossly underestimated noise levels. - Sustained noise ~ 70dB on north side of Highland (at 5AM!) - Sustained noise > 67dB three rows of homes into Barossa Place, - Denied Cambridge/Elmhurst a wall because only 1 home (in a group of 35) would benefit - underestimating both the amount of noise and its range into the community! · Sound32 underestimates soundwall effectivity. - 100% underestimate of VJHS wall. (est: 5dB, act: 10dB) - Nonetheless denied Barossa Place a wall because the effectivity was 20% short. I asked three years ago for the Rte 30 task force to demand Caltrans quantify their confidence in that 20% and Caltrans did not. They could not - the model is not that good. ·Professional engineers do not present results without an estimate of confidence. Our community was not served. How good was Sound32? · Not very. · Barossa Place site 59036 predicted to reach 65dBA in 2012. · Measures > 70 dBA (continuous!) NOW! Around 5AM! - > 80 dBA Ldn. - > 30 dBA above nighttime ambient noise levels. · 3rd Row of houses Barossa Place (site 59036) Sound Pressure STILL > 67dBA noise Levels; 9 Jan, AM Commute abatement criteria! ~ 85 Ldn=80.3dBA '~ 75 · Do they expect freeway ~ ~ .... use to decline over the ,~ _.~ 70 , ~~..~~ next 10 years? ~ 65 · .~ Leq=70.3dBA c: 60 o 55 , 6:30:00 6:35:00 6:40:00 6:45:00 6:50:00 6:55:00 Time Mi'd-Barossa PI!ace SPLs, · Three rows of houses in, SPL at 9801 Caldaro Street, 3 January. sound pressure levels dB_day/night exceed 67dBA Leq, 77dBA ,-~ 80 7AM) Ldn. - All Barossa Place homes, and Cambridge/Elmhurst, and ~, 70 Highland Ave/Alta Loma Drive, meet the noise abatement ~ 65 · I reqmrements. '~ 60 · Entire communities : impacted not single ~ 4:00:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 7:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM homes! H ow good i s a wa II ? Highland Ave Noise Levels With and Without a Very, very good. Soundwall; noise measured at north curb. 9 Jan, AM commute. cars on Highland Ave. Compared noise at north ~ | ,I, , I,,~,... side of Highland, 2 locations. -Highland Church (near Cambridge St.) - Vineyard JHS. 16' Wall 'Benefit' ~ 10dB VJHS Parking Entrance 55 10dB 'benefit' for a 16' ~:~:~~:~8:~ 6:o~:.~ ~:~:~~:~o:~o wall. -Sound32 underestimated wall efficiency by ~5dB. - So, on what authority did Caltrans deny the Barossa Place wall, using a 4dB estimate as different from 5dB? How bad is 70 dBA? · 10,000x more intense than your average Table of Sound Pressure Levels and Corresponding Sound Pressure and Sound Intensity quiet bedroom. Sound Sound Examples Pressure Pressure Sound Intensity - At 5 AM, this is Level dB Pa watts/m2 impressive. 30m fTom jet aircraft 140 200 100 Threshold of pain 130 10 120 20 1 · 10x more intense Chainsaw 110 0.1 than conversational Disco 100 2 0.01 90 0.001 speech. Kerbside of busy road 80 0.2 0.0001 70 0.00001 · Leq(24) = 70, Noise Conversational speech 60 0.02 0.000001 Exposure Threshold s0 0.0000001 40 0.002 0.00000001 for hearing damage. Quiet bedroom at night 30 0.000000001 Background in TV studio20 0.0002 0.0000000001 · Caltrans elected not 10 0.00000000001 Threshold of hearing 0 0.00002 0.000000000001 to try to mitigate [su Basic Science Analysis of Sound Waves.htm [ ~ i -- © 1998 T~ - this? i i_ i SafetyLine Institute:j Property/Va!ue !m pact · Community tax receipts suffer- forever. · Simple math: - Excessive community impacts homeowner equity. · All homes in a community suffer when 'comps' are depressed. - The hit is forever- impacted communities lag behind their neighbors, even as property values rise. - A 10% decrease in homeowner equity for the segment 3 homes yields about a $52,000/year decrease in property tax receipts. (78 Barossa Place homes, 35 Cambridge/Elmhurst homes, 49 Highland Ave homes, 1 apartment complex.) · That's 52k$/yr in constant 2003 dollars, forever. ·Caltrans, denying a wall on an iffy Sound32 model and a questionable placement for that wall, shifted the impact for the wall onto homeowners and the rest of the community, burdening Rancho Cucamonga with a $200,000 garden wall cost, even as the state tries to shift other costs onto us. What is Caltrans Waiting For? ·2 years to a garden wall or soundwall is unacceptable. · Current delay to research how much setback to reserve for truck access? - Every 2 feet reserved requires another 1 foot higher wall. (Berm has a 1 over 2 slope .... ) - Claremont has examples where no such truck access is necessary. (eg. Between Towne and Baseline.) · Wall needs to be near or at the crest of the berm, and all remaining land needs to be converted to a park. Recommendatiions: · We ask that this council direct Engineering to remand the Caltrans sound study as unacceptable until the optimization of the wall's location, the El Rancho Grande wall, and the 5AM peak noise are specifically addressed. - Soundwalls must be constructed between Hermosa and Beryl. · Garden wall between Hellman and Amethyst should be replaced. - The soundwalls must be at the crown of the berm to be effective. · The linear park concept should be pushed forward - two years with chain link fencing and a dirt heap is not acceptable. - Caltrans should be allowed no service corridor behind the wall - it would detract from the value of that park and reduces the effectivity of any wall, garden or soundwall. · Recognize that more than 1 house is involved when denying Highland Ave and site 59038 a sound wall. - Cost shows up in property values of over 150 units- and Rancho Cucamonga tax receipts carry that penalty for perpetuity. - Multiple neighborhoods are negatively impacted. I~ A N C H O C U C a M O N G A ]~ N GIN ~I~I~IN C D E PA~ T MI~N t SlaffR ort DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'NeJl, City Engineer BY: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: BATTERY BACK-UP POWER AT CITY TRAFFIC SIGNALS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council support staff's recommendation to rely on the provisions of Section 21800 (d) of the Califomia Vehicle Code that states that the driver of any vehicle approaching an intersection where the traffic signal controls are inoperative, shall stop at the intersection, and may proceed with caution when it is safe to do so. Inoperative traffic signals are in effect, treated like all-way stops. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: . During February of 2001, the City was subjected to several "brown-outs" where the electrical power was unexpectedly turned off for several hours over large areas of the City. When the electrical power is turned off, the traffic signals cease to operate. This results in a "blacked-out" condition. The condition where a tra. ffic signal is blacked-out or inoperative is covered by Section 21800 (d) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which requires drivers to treat inoperative or blacked-out signals as all-way stops. However, many drivers either do not know this law or choose to ignore the law. Also, if the power outage occurs after dark, the presence of a blacked-out signal may not be readily apparent to a driver. In response to this situation, the City Council in March of 2001 approved the purchase of battery back-up power units and LED signal heads for all or the traffic signals within the City or Rancho Cucamonga. This also included the signals that are owned and maintained by Caltrans. (The traffic signals on Foothill Boulevard, 19th Street and Highland Avenue east of Rochester Avenue are owned and maintained by Caltrans.) The cost of this project was $675,000, and the installation of battery back-up power units at all traffic signals in the City was completed in June of 2002. SUBJECT: BATTERY.BACK-UP POWER AT CITY TRAFFIC SIGNALS January 15, 2003 Page 2 On January 5th and 6th of 2003, the City experienced 80 to 90 mph winds and widespread power outages. Approximately 10 to 12 signals lost power and began relying on battery back-up power. The battery back-up power units are designed to provide enough power to keep the signals flashing red for up to 8 hours. During this latest windstorm, power was restored at most signals before the batteries ran out of power. However, at 4 locations, the power outage lasted longer than 24 hours. These locations were: Base Line at Vineyard, Foothill at Ramona, Foothill at Amhibald, and 19th at Beryl. Of these 4 signals, only the signal at Base Line and Vineyard is owned and maintained by the City. The other 3 signals are owned and maintained by Caltrans. On Tuesday, January 07, 2003, City staff replaced the batteries at the 4 blacked-out signals with fresh batteries taken from other intersections. By Wednesday, January 08, 2003, the electrical power had been restored, and all signals were working normally. Public agencies including Caltrans, the County of Los Angeles, the County of Orange, the County of San Bernardino, do not put up temporary stop signs when signals are blacked- out or inoperative. In San Bernardino County, only the Cities of Claremont, Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga have installed battery back-up power units in traffic signals. Public agencies including the Cities of Ontario, Upland and Chino rely on the provisions of Section 21800 (d) of the California Vehicle Code, which indicates that an inoperative or blacked-out traffic signal should be treated as an all-way stop. Respectfully Submitted, ' W~"~m J. O'Neil City E~ngineer WJO:JG R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: January 15, 2003 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Day Creek Park (Previously Rancho Etiwanda Park): The project has recently been delayed due to extreme wind damage and rain damage. The restroom building is approximately 95% complete. Plans for the tennis court fencing and wind screening have been reviewed by a structural engineer and are scheduled for installation. Top soil has been placed on the ball fields. Play equipment has been ordered. Construction fencing is in place. South Etiwanda Park: · A topographic survey has been prepared of the site. The architect is working on the conceptual plan. Central Park: · The project received approval from the Planning Commission on December 11th. The Design Development submittal was provided to the City for review on December 23rd. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 East Beryl Park: · Tot Lot walls, vehicular barrier walls and restroom are complete. Perimeter walkways are installed. Tot Lot equipment is on order. Landscape restoration to begin within the next few weeks. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · The Senior Center will host a special Hospitality Dinner for any new patron of the Senior Center on January 15, at 5:00 p.m. This is a time for staff to introduce the new patrons to all that the Senior Center has to offer. · "Are you ready for some football?" Enjoy refreshments and good spirited rivalry as you cheer on your favorite teams from the NFC and AFC at the annual Senior Center Super Bowl Party, on January 26~. · The Senior Advisory Committee's next regular meeting is scheduled for Monday, January 27, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. · December Events - During December the Senior Center hosted two very special events. Highlights of these events are as follows: o Holiday Party - December 19th - Approximately 175 spirited seniors enjoyed a fabulous Holiday performance by the ever-popular Carrs, a dynamic performing duo from distant shores. George and Joann Carr were invited back for the fourth consecutive year to entertain at the annual holiday affair. o New Year's Party - December 31st - Pianist virtuoso Saleena Gauba entertained a mesmerized crowd at the annual Senior Center New Year's Party. The concert was followed by a traditional toast to the New Year and a countdown with all the noise and cheer that follows. Happy New Year! · Our first large-scale senior event for 2003 will be a Senior's Valentine's Party on February 13th. The event will take place between 10:00 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. and will include entertainment, door prizes and great fellowship. Human Services: · HICAP - A volunteer counselor from the State of California Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP) will be available for appointments on Thursdays, January 2na and 16th, between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. The HICAP program assists individuals and families with Medicare problems and other health insurance concerns. Trained and registered volunteer counselors provide objective information on Medicare, Medicare supplement insurance, managed care, long-term care planning and health insurance. Community education, individual counseling and some legal services are also available and are administered through the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 · DAAS - A representative from the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) will be available on Monday, February 3rd , from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., to answer questions on various issues, such as housing, filing forms and other senior related services. Individuals will be assisted on a first come first served basis. · Elder Law Matters - Due to an overwhelming demand for his services, Elder Law Attorney Gregory Wood now offers two days of free counseling sessions. Attorney Wood will be available for appointments at the Senior Center on Fridays, January 3rd and 17th, between 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. · A.qeWise - An outreach program for healthy aging. The goal of the AgeWise program is to provide free in-home counseling services to older adults to maintain the best possible physical and mental health. Services include: senior peer counseling, support groups, and educational classes. For more information, call 1-800-451-5633. · Health Screenin,q - Nurses from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health offer free health assessments, blood pressure, height, weight and hemoglobin testing. Counseling and referrals are also available the second Tuesday of the month from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. Walk-ins are welcome Trips and Tours: · Palm Sprinqs Follies, January 25, 2003. Flying Down to Rio! The fabulous Palm Springs Follies is a three-hour razzle-dazzle, song and dance vaudeville-style extravaganza showcasing the music and dance of the 30's and 40's. Each cast member is 55 to 88 years of age. Don't miss this incredible show. · Murder Mystery Dinner Theater, February 8, 2003. Embark on an evening train ride with an excellent dinner, hearty laughs and some less-than-serious sleuthing. Enjoy a first-class, full-course dinner, served while actors commit mirth and murder. Jump right in and help solve the murder, or simply sit back, be waited on and enjoy the show. · Solvan.q, March 15, 2003. Step into this quaint Danish village and enjoy all the sights, sounds, and scents that surround you. Enjoy the day at you leisure to explore the Scandinavian import shops and bakeries of Solvang. Volunteer Services: · The table on the next page summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the month of November 2002 and year to date: City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 Month: November 2002 YEAR TO DATE # of # of Volunteers # of Hours $ Value Volunteers # of Hours i Value ~,dmin 5 15 210 61 183 2,562 Sports 84 790 11,060 2,586 27,399 383,586 Sr & Human 99 399 5,586 543 3,746 52,444 Services Special 37 134 1,876 642 2,999 46,172 --vents Youth 67 200 2,800 1,126 8,555 120,972 =rograms Total I 292 1,538 $21,532 4,712 42,882 $605,736 'Based on $14/hour. Teens: · The table below summarizes teen proqram participation for the month of December 2002: Program Attendance ! Month - December Teen Center 554 Homework Room 46 TRAC - Babysitting 20 TRAC members babysat 69youn§sters TRAC - Monthly meetin~]s 42 Spruce Skate Park 1,650 · Teen Center. Staff is in the process of planning events for the teens to participate in for the spring break. · The Teen Center Homework Room. Teens are coming to the homework room to do their Internet reseamh for their school projects. During the month of January we anticipate an increase in use of the homework room as teens work on their mid-term reports. · The Teen Recreation Activity Club's (TRAC), twice-monthly babysitting service "Night on the Town" is usually at capacity and continues to grow. TRAC volunteers also provided babysitting services for the City's holiday party on December 6th. · TRAC teens are meeting every month to discuss programs and events they would like to see the City offer to teens in the community. Twelve (12) of our TRAC teens participated in a multi-city event in Paramount called the Teen Jam. At this event teens can go on rides, listen to live bands, visit display booths that discuss teen issues or teen programs with other teens from cities throughout Southern California. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 · The Spruce Park Skate Park Staff is making regular weekly visits to the skate park to promote safe skating by handing out donated chips and beverages free to the youth wearing their proper gear. Staff is working with the Police Department to develop a marketing plan that will inform youth in our community about the new helmet law that took effect on January 1, 2003. The new law, SB1924, states that anyone under 18 years old may not operate a bicycle, in-line skates, skateboard or scooter with out wearing a helmet. Youth Activities: · Our Playschool Classes are filling up quickly for our winter session. Currently we have over 620 youngsters registered into classes at our four locations. Additional classes were added to accommodate those on our waiting list. Playschool classes showcased their holiday decorations in the rotunda at City Hail during December and early January. · The annual Breakfast with Santa was held on December 6, 2002. Rancho'Grande Kiwanis did all the cooking again this year for the event. They prepared over 336 participants breakfast consisting of pancakes, sausage and beverages. Forty (40) young adult volunteers served the parents and their children. Children were entertained with arts & crafts, live songs, balloon animal artist and of course Santa Claus. · The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a neighborhood event. The program served over 759 youth for the month of November. The Mobile Recreation Unit had one (1) rental for the month of November at the Lewis Evergreen Apartment Complex, serving 30 Lewis apartment participants. The Recreation Unit is going to the following park sites: Weekday Park Location Program Time Monday Bear Gulch Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Tuesday Old Town Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Wednesday Hermosa Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Thursday Mountain View Park 2:30 -5:00 pm ~--z, Friday Windrows Park 2:30 - 5:00 pm Grants: · The Teen Connection Staff visited all the local high school campus in November and interacted with over 3,300 students. Staff will visit the following campuses during their lunch periods on the following days: Weekday High School Students Served during December Monday Los Oso 300 (first 2 weeks) Tuesday Etiwanda 520 (first 2 weeks) Wednesday Rancho Cucamonga 615 (first 2 weeks) Thursday Alta Loma 390 (first 2 weeks) City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 · Youth Enrichment Services (YES) attendance is increasing at both the Mulberry Learning Center and the Lions East Center. Staff is replacing the old Youth Enrichment Logo and implementing the new First 5 logo from the commission. The table below provides attendance statistics for the month of December 2002. Location / Site Attendance - December 2002 Mulberry Learning FACTS Center 814 participants Lions East FACTS Center 874 participants Car Seat Safety Checks 33 safety checks Special Interest Classes 55 participants Classes: · Recreation Classes - Currently we have over 2,900 participants registered into our 243 recreation classes for the winter session. Some new classes added for our winter session are: Ceramics and Clay, Adult Ceramics, Family Fun, Fitness Mini Holiday Sessions, Muscle Tone/Body Sculpt and Step Aerobics. Youth Sports: · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # of Age/Gender # Teams Participants Fail Pee Wee Basketball 234 3-5/boys & girls 24 Winter Pee Wee Basketball 230 3-5/boys & girls 24 Youth Basketball 992 6-15/boys & girls 124 Winter Baseball/Softball Camp 60 6-13/boys & girls N/A RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # of Participants Adult Basketball 772 Youth Basketball 1,355 Adult Racquetball 330 Youth Racquetball 36 Adult Volleyball 91 Youth Volleyball 111 Jazzercise 993 City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity # of Participants Age/Gender # Teams Adult Racquetball 14 Adult/Males N/A Adult Basketball (full court) 100 Adult/Males 10 Adult Basketball (3-on-3) 50 Adult/Males 5 Adult Sports: · Four (4) adult softball tournaments will take place at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex during the month of January. · Thirty-six (36) adults are participating in our tennis leaques this winter. · The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # of Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,688 168 Males/Females Soccer 784 49 Males/Females Flag Football 110 11 Males Sports Trips: · The Sports Division is offering the community the opportunity to spend the day attending game of some of our local professional sports teams. Registration for the Los Angeles Clippers versus Dallas Mavericks game on January 12th is taking place now. Future sports trips include the Los Angeles Clippers vs. Toronto Rapters game on March 16th and Los Angeles Kings vs. Boston Bruins game on March 22®. Cost for each trip is approximately $35.00 per person and includes game ticket and transportation. Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit or.qanized youth sport leaques. For the reporting period, 11 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 226,038 participants and spectators enjoying our parks during both practices and game times. Community Wide Special Events: · Staff is busy planning our sprinq community wide special events that include: Kids Fest th rd (April 19 ), Cinco de Mayo (Ma'y 3 ) and our Silver Anniversary celebration at the Epicenter (May 10th). Parks and Facilities: · The table on the next page provides information on park/special use facility reservations for the month of December 2002: City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 Location Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications Processed of Rentals Red Hill 250 6 6 13 Community Park Heritage Community 20 1 1 4 Park Hermosa Park 30 1 1 5 Milliken Park 50 2 2 7 Coyote Canyon Park 25 1 1 4 Civic Center 0 0 0 0 Courtyard Amphitheater 0 0 0 0 Equestrian Center 120 4 4 18 Total 495 15 15 51 Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Equestrian Center usaqe for the months of January and February 2003 is shown in the table below: Group Date Event/Time Frame Alta Loma Riding Club January 2nd Board Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:30p.m. 4-H Club January 20tn General Meetingf7:00p.m.-9:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club January 21st General Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club February 2no Show/9:00a.m.-3:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club February 6th Board Meeting/7:30p.m.-9:00p,m. 4-H Club February 8th (rain Valentine's Show/8:00a.m.-5:00p.m. date: February 1~~) 4-H Club February 17th General Meeting/7:00p.m.-9:00p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club February 18t~ General MeetingfT:30p.m.-9:00p.m. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission will be on January 16th. At that meeting the following agenda items will be discussed/acted upon: · Update on the Senior Advisory Committee. · Update on the Sports Advisory Committee. · Update on the Central Park project. · Update on the Cultural Center project. · Discussion regarding community sports groups fee policies, · Discussion regarding Commission participation at the California Park and Recreation Society Conference to be held March 19-22, 2003, in San Jose. · Annual review of Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating to recreation activities, programs and services. · Review of Community Services Department's 2001-2002 Program Report, · Review of proposed design for Victoria Arbors Park. · Review of Red Hill Community Park field layout. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The following items were discussed at the Community Foundation's January 14, 2003 meetinq: · Update on Cultural Center project. · Consideration of approving Foundation affiliate status for the new senior center fundraising committee and setting up a Senior Center Fund. · Discussion regarding plans for the 2003 Founder's Gala. · Consideration of providing sponsorship funding for the Community Services Department's production of Once Upon a Mattress. · Community Foundation Strategic Planning Session fl4 -- Board Development, Fund Development Training and Development of a Fund Development Plan. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · In preparation of the 2003 Quakes baseball season, the Epicenter field is down for renovation between now and February 2003. The field renovation will, of course, limit staff's ability to rent the facility during this time frame. · Staff is near completion of a 5-minute Epicenter marketin.q video of the facility. This piece will provide potential users/renters of the facility with an up close look at all of the amenities that the facility has to offer. Copies of the video will be available in both CD and VHS format and will also be loading onto the Epicenter's website. · Staff is in the process of developing marketing packets for the Epicenter to be sent to potential film producers and other rental opportunities. · Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the Epicenter: · Rancho Cucamonga Valley Baseball Club (Quakes) - Free Angels Youth Baseball Clinic - January 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Diversified Marketing - Used Car Tent Sale - February 20-24, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area. · Abundant Living Church - Easter Services - April 20, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium and Softball Field. · Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Bike Safety Clinic - May 3, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area. · Community Services Department - Silver Anniversary Celebration - May 10, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Inland Valley Daily Bulletin - High School All Stars Game - June 10, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Rancho Cucamonga High School - 2003 Graduation Ceremony - June 11, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Vons/Safeway - Celebrity/CEO Soflbafl Tournament - September 27, 2003 - Epicenter Stadium. · Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - Grape Harvest Festival - October 2- 5, 2003 - Epicenter Special Event Area. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update January 15, 2003 Respectfully subm~/~, Kevin McArdle Joe O'Neil Community Services Director City Engineer htCOMMSERV~Council&BoardstCityCouncil~StaffReports[2OO31update 1.15.03. doc