HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/09/22 - Agenda Packet1977
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONC~
PLANNING COMMISSION
__.ENDA
WEDNESDAY
SEPTEMBER 22, 1993
7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUC~/~ONGA, CALIFORNIA
III·
IV.
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Commissioner Chitiea
Commissioner McNiel
Commissioner Melcher
Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Vallette
Announcements
&pproval of Minutes
September 8, 1993
V. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
ae
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING. INC. - A request
to establish a truck terminal/storage facility
on a 3.57 acre site containing a 1,560 square
foot office building and a 1,056 square foot
repair garage, located in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
southeast corner of 5th Street and Lucas Ranch
Road - APN: 210-071-37 and 41. Staff
recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative
Declaration.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-38 - WILKINSON - A
request to establish an administrative and
office use on 3 acres of land in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the
southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak
Street - APN: 209-144-80.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-37 - TERRA VISTA
ANIMAL HOSPITAL - A request to establish an
animal hospital within a 1,500 square foot
leased space in an existing shopping center in
the Neighborhood Commercial District of the
Terra Vista Planned Community, located at 10598
Base Line Road, Suite F - APN: 1076-481-35.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-26 - MASI PARTNERS -
A request to permit a liquor store and
delicatessen of 2,700 square feet in Building 7
(7,739 square feet) of previously approved
Conditional Use Permit 91-24, located on 27
acres at the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) .of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan -
APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-33 - MASI PARTNERS -
A request to permit the sales of tea, coffee,
books, magazines, and newspapers in 1,000
square feet in Building 7 (7,739 square feet)
of previously approved Conditional Use Permit
91-24, located on 27 acres at the southwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea
7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan -
APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-34 - MASI PARTNERS -
A request to permit a florist of 1,000 square
feet in Building 7 (7,739 square feet) of
previously approved Conditional Use Permit
91-24, located on 27 acres at the southwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea
7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan -
APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-35 - MASI PARTNERS -
A request to permit a hair and nail salon of
1,000 square feet in Building 7 (7,739 square
feet) of previously approved Conditional Use
Permit 91-24, located on 27 acres at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue in the Industrial Park
District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and
26 through 28.
H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS -
A request to permit a dry cleaners of 2,000
square feet in Building 7 (7,739 square feet)
of previously approved Conditional Use Permit
91-24, located on 27 acres at the southwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea
7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan -
APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
I. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 93-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to allow
additional monument signs for shopping centers.
VI. PUbliC Comments
This is the time and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
VII. Commission Business
VIII. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --
STAFF REPORT
Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~ission
Brad Bull,r, City Planner
Steve Hayes, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-04 - EZE
TRUCKING, INC. - A request to establish a truck terminal/storage
facility on a 3.57 acre site containing a 1,560 square foot office
building and a 1,056 square foot repair garage, located in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of 5th Street and
Lucas Ranch Road - APN: 210-071-37 and 41.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
Site Characteristics: The site is currently improved with a 1,056 square
foot repair garage for large trucks and a 1,560 square foot office
building which were built prior to incorporation. A majority of the site
is an unpaved storage area. Curb and qutter exists along the entire
project frontage. Chain link fencing surrounds the site.
B. Parking Calculations:
N,,m~er of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Office 1,560 1/250 6 7
Fleet Storage
(35 Truck/trailers) 1/vehicle 35 83 *
The entire site will either be paved or treated with an erosion
controlling treatment (i.e., gravel or slag) and is more than adequate to
accommodate the proposed use. (The n~,mher is based on staff's
interpretation of the vehicle storage parking standards within the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.)
ANALYSIS:
General: The applicant began operating a truck terminal and storage
facility and was contacted by Code Enforcement regarding the need for a
CUP. In addition to truck storage, the applicant will utilize the
existing office building from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. every ~ay. The other
structure on the proparty is proposed to be used for minor repairs and oil
changes. Fueling and washing of vehicles will occur off site. The
ITEM A
PLANNING CO~24ISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING, INC.
September 22, 1993
Page 2
applicant plans to have 6 office employees, 15 truck drivers, and 1
mechanic. The applicant has stated that all of the truck drivers will
park their personal vehicles behind the proposed screen walls while on
assignment. For further information about the use, please refer to
Exhibit "D."
The applicant will construct a solid slump block screen wall along the 5th
Street and Lucas Ranch Road frontages, with solid rolling metal gates
proposed at the vehicular entrance/exit locations. In addition, the
applicant will landscape the streetscape along both street frontages and
relocate the office employee parking to meet the required streetscape
setbacks for parking.
Issues: In analyzing this proposal, the following items may be seen as
potential issues:
Land Use Compatibility: The site is located in a General Industrial
Land Use designation where uses such as light and medi%un intensity
manufacturing, light and medium intensity storage/distribution,
automotive repair, and contractor's offices and yards are permitted.
Existing surrounding development includes contractor storage
facilities and several manufacturing operations. Staff. feels that the
proposed use would be consistent and not create any detrimental
effects on adjacent users; and therefore, not create any land use
conflicts. A similar trucking operation used to exist just down the
street with no complaints from surrounding businesses.
Parking: Because of the large parking area on the site, staff
anticipates no parking problems. A Condition of Approval has been
added to ensure that the minimum required parking spaces be striped
per City standards for the office parking area.
Site Improvements: In order to bring the site into conformance with
current Industrial Area Specific Plan and Development Code requirements,
the following upgrades are recommended:
An 8-foot high decorative screen wall should be constructed along both
street frontages at a minimum 25-foot setback from the face of curbs
to screen the truck storage area from view.
2. The minimum 25-foot average landscape setback should be irrigated and
planted per City Standards.
The vehicular parking area should be set back a minimUm of 15 feet
from curb, paved, and striped per City standards and be designed to
accommodate a minimum of six passenger vehicles.
4. A wrought iron gate or solid decorative metal gate should be installed
at the driveways on Lucas Ranch Road.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING, INC.
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5. The unpaved portion of the lot should be treated for dust and erosion
control with an all-weather driving surface (i.e., slag or gravel).
6. Landscaping should be provided in the office parking lot and along
interior site boundaries per City standards.
All items except No. 5 are shown on the proposed plans. These items have
been included as Conditions of Approval in the attached Resolution of
Approval, with specific details subject to review and approval of staff.
Technical Review Co~nittee: The Technical Review Co~aittee reviewed the
project on July 7, 1993, and determined that with the recommended
Conditions of Approval, the project is in compliance with all City
standards.
Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed
by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II, the Environmental
Checklist, and has found that, although there are potential adverse
environmental impacts related to hazardous waste disposal, the project
will not have any significant environmental impacts because of the
required mitigation measures. A Condition of Approval has been included
in the attached Resolution of Approval that an Industrial Discharge Permit
shall be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Board. If
the Commission concurs with staff's findings, then issuance of a mitigated
Negative Declaration would be in order.
RECO~iENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration
and approval of Condition Use Permit 93-04 through adoption of the attached
Resolution of Approval.
City Planner
BB:SH:sp
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Site/Landscape Plan
Exhibit "C" - Wall Plan
Exhibit "D" - Letter from Applicant
Resolution of Approval
SITF
UTILIZATION
MAP
J M. WIL, SON& ASSOCIATErS
SUBAREA 5
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
:1
~x'H-~$/'T
EZE TRUCKING, INC.
9551 LUCAS RANCH RD.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA~ 91730
(909)945-2462 * FAX (909)944-3223
The City of Rancho Cueauaonga
10500 C~¢ Center Dr.
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cueamaong~ Ca. 91729
C.P~ 93-04
April 28, 1993
4-28-93
EZE Trucking, as ofMa.v Ist, will emvlov six office employees, fifteen drivers, and one
mechanic. Our office hours m'e 6:00 a. ttr to 6:(30 p.ar Our trucks leave the yard once in
the morning and return only one time after their day is complete. Not all of our ~'ucks
return each day. Some of them run of out of state, and up to the bay area and are gone
over night
We do not do any w~hlrxg or fueling of trucks at our t~a~ility. At[ of that is done at the
76 Truck Stop on .Milliken. We do some of our own ~mall repairs and muintenmce in our
2 bay shop located at the south end of the yard. All motor oil i~ stored m a b,lle 500 ~1
container. All waste oil is stored in a bulk tank as well and is pumped out by un oil recy-
cling company. We return all of our life casings to the recapping companies for a casing
credit, so we do not store large amounts ofus~i fires at our f, ac~lity. We do warehouse
ap!vrox. 5-10 tires at any one given time.
Bruce Bidnick Pres.
EZE Trucking, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-04, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A TRUCK
TERMINAL/STORAGE FACILITY ON A 3.57 ACRE SITE CONTAINING
A 1,560 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND A 1,056 SQUARE
FOOT REPAIR GARAGE, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 5TH STREET AND
LUCAS RANCH ROAD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 210-071-37 AND 41.
A. Recitals.
(i) Eze Trucking, Inc. has filed an application for the issuance of
Conditional Use Permit No. 93-04 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22 day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on %he
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southeast corner of Lucas Ranch Road and 5th Street with Lucas Ranch Road
frontage of 480 feet and 5th Street frontage of 324 feet and is presently
improved with two buildings and a curb and gutter along the entire property
frontage;
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is currently
vacant, the property to the south of the site consists of an existing
contractor's office and storage yard, the property to the east is an existing
contractor's storage yard and the property to the west consists of a
manufacturing/storage facility.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING, INC.
September 22, 1993
Page 2
(c) The application contemplates the use of the existing
buildings on the property for an office and a truck repair garage, with the
balance of the site used for storage of semi-truck trailers and the personal
vehicle~ of employees.
(d) The application proposes the use of the facility for
office use from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. A total of 6 office employees, 15
truck operators, and 1 mechanic is anticipated to be hired by the applicant.
(e) The application contemplates the use of the truck repair
garage for minor repairs and oil changes for the fleet of trucks. The
applicant expects to have up to 35 trucks in their fleet. Vehicles will be
fueled and washed off-site.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated
Negative Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, ~, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannin~ Division:
1)
This approval shall apply to the fleet storage
and minor repair of semi-truck trailers
only. Storage of other vehicles or equipment
is prohibited except where otherwise permitted
by the Industrial Specific Plan. Fueling and
washing of trucks is not included in this
permit.
PL~NNING COM24ISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING, INC.
September 22, 1993
Page 3
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
The screen wall shall be a uniform height of
8 feet from finished grade. The final design
of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by
the Planning Division prior to the issuance of
building permits for the wall.
The landscape and wall setback along 5th
Street and Lucas Ranch Road shall be a minimum
of 25 feet from back of curb, per City
standards.
The final design of the office parking area
shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Division prior to the issuance of building
permits for the screen wall.
A minimum 10-foot wide landscape area shall be
provided on the south side of the office
building, between the building and parking
area, to provide a sufficient area for the
growth of trees to shade the parking lot.
Details for this landscape area shall be shown
on the detailed landscape/irrigation plans.
Trees and ground cover shall be provided in
landscape planter areas along interior
property lines. These trees shall be planted
at a ratio of one tree per 30 linear feet, per
the requirements of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan.
Berming, low walls, shrub hedgerows, or a
combination thereof, shall be provided to
screen the office parking from public view, to
the satisfaction of the Planning Division.
The truck repair building shall be painted to
match the proposed block color of the
streetscape screen walls, to the satisfaction
of the Planning Division.
The solid metal security gates shall be
painted to match the proposed screen wall, to
the satisfaction of the Planning Division.
When left for extended period of time, all
personal vehicles of the truck drivers shall
be parked in the storage yard behind the
screen walls.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING, INC.
September 22, 1993
Page 4
11)
The unpaved truck storage area shall be
treated with an all-weather driving surface
that controls dust and erosion, to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
12)
All hazardous materials and waste, including
but not limited to, motor oil, brake fluid,
transmission fluid, and freon, shall be
properly disposed of in accordance with state
and local regulations. A NPDES Industrial
Discharge Permit shall be obtained from the
California Regional Water Quality Central
Board, Santa Ana Region.
13)
If operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or
operations, including but not limited to,
parking or noise, the Conditional Use Permit
shall be brought before the Planning
Commission for consideration and possible
termination of the use.
14)
All required improvements shall be completed
prior to commencement of the approved use or
120 days, whichever is sooner.
En~ineerina Division:
1)
Both existing drive approaches on Lucas Ranch
Road shall be removed and replaced with new
drive approaches per existing City standards
{101-C).
2)
Align the southerly drive approach with the
existing drive approach on the west side of
Lucas Ranch Road.
3)
Replace the existing street light on a wooden
power pole with an ornamental marbleits street
light at the northeast property corner on 5th
Street.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this~ Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-04 - EZE TRUCKING, INC.
September 22, 1993
Page 5
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT#:
SU~ECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
Those items ched(ed are Conditions of Approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (714) 98~.18~1, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. Time Liralie
'v/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, it building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / / /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __./ /
4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and comummate or cause to be commenced,
participated in, or consummated, a Malio-Fioos Community FacilEMs District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolection District to finance construction and/or maintenance o!
a fire. station to serve the deveiopment. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specitications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the
District"s property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needa. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final map
Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building parmlts, whichever comes
first, the applicant shall consent to, or particiDate in, the establishment of a Melio-Roos
Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district haS 13'eviou$1y established such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, conseN to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building parmits, whichever comes first. Furlher, it the affected school
district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of lhe project and prior to the recordation of the tinat map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
/ /
/ /
SC - 2/91 t of 12
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
sctxx)l districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
impacts as a result o! this project.
Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days pdor to final map approval in the casa of subclivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
~// 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which
include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Cede regulations, and
I ,, ..] ~, ~-,~ ~'~. ISpecific Plan and
Planned Community.
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Cede and
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incoqx)rating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits.
P ~:~cct ,%'0.: ~
/ /
__/ /
/, /
.._J /
/ ./
5. Allsite, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated tor ~ . /
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (~uch as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot sutxtivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections ol the DevelopmeN ~ /
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and appitcat~ Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
7. A detailed on-alta lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / /
Sheriff's DepartmeN (989-6611) prior to the ismJance o! building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method .of shielding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent properties.
8. If no centralized trash receplaclas are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units __J /
with all raceptacMs shieldegt from public view.
V/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standard. The final design, locations, -~/ /
and ~a numl~r of trash receplacie~ shall be sol:~ lo Ci~ Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as translormers, AC condensers, etc., shall / /
be located out of public view and adequately screened throl. lgh the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls, barming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner. .~ /~
2/91 2 of' l~
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the adored Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building numbers and Individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and I:.ior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine
animals where zoning requirementstorthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the oplion of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Ankles of Incorporation o! the
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recordact concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever _oc~_JrS first. A recorcied copy shall be
providecl to the City Engineer.
16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping Shall be permanently maintained bytbe property
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acce~la to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted fir City Planner and City Engineer review and
app~roval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunli~ acros~ adlacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions fir
the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation ol the final map or
issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The ea~emehts shal prohibit the casting of
shm~ows by vegetation, stnJcturee, tixtur~ or any other objact, excelX for utility wires and
similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical landmark. The site shall be developed and
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landma~ Aliaration Permit No.
· Any further moclificatiorm to the site including, ~ riot limited to, exterior alleratione and/or
interior alterationswhich affect the extedorotthe buildingsor structures, removal of landmark
trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or stnJotures, or changes to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and approval.
C, Building liesign
An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water tot all dwelling units
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unles. other alternative energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent ~ity and efficiency. NI swimming IXX)le Inetalled at the
time of initial development ~ be sul:q)lemsnted with solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plane and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
S~ - 2/gl
All G~vellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural
treatment, detailing and increasa<:l delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner
review and approval I:)hor to issuance o! building permits.
3of 12
/ /
/ ,, /
/ /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
D. Parking
./
Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be amhitecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
and Vehicular ACCESS (Indicate datatea on building plane)
1. All parking lot landscape islands shell have a minimum outside dimension ol 6 feet and shall
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be
provided t broughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
3. All parking spaces shell be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,
entrances, and exits shall be striped per City sfanclards.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in
depth from back of sidewalk.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shell restrict the storage of recreational vehicles
on this site unless they are the principal source of transpotlation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas.
Plans for any security gates shell be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and a1313roval prior to issuance of building
permits.
E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landlca!M areas, relor to Section N.)
V// 1. A detailed landecapa and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap-
ing in the case of residential develogmem, stroll be prepared by a licensed landecapa
architect and submitted for City Planner review and a13f)mvel IMor to the issuance of building
permits or prior final map a1313roval in the case of a custom lot su13divislon.
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be pmtaofed with a construction bemer
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.09.110, and so ncted onthe grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and now locations for transplanted trees
shall be stx~vn on the detailed landeca13e plans. The ar~iicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transG)lanting and trimming methods.
A minimum Of trees pargross acm,com13med of the following sizes, sitall be provided
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inc~ box or larger,
__ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and ~% - 5 gallon;
A minimum of ; o % of tress planted within the project shall be specimen size trees -
24-inch box or larger.
Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate Of one 1S-gallon tree for every three
parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
/,, /
/ /__
._/ /
/ /
/ /
__/ /
__./ /
/ /
,./ /
SC - 2/91
4 of' 12
6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building, / /
7. AllprivatesicpebanksSfeetorlessinverticalheightandofS:l orgmaterslope. but less than / /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to _oc~__,pancy.
All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. if. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vap/slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
/ /
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu-
ously maintained in a healthy and Ihdving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupartcy for those units, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in setistacto~/
V 10. For mullFfamlly residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / /
sible for the continual maintenance of all ianclscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All iandKapecl areas shall be kel:X tree from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or
decaying plant matedal shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11. Front yard landscaping shell be required per the Development Code and/or / /__
· This requirement shall be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, iancisceping, and sidewalks shall be __/ /
included in the required lanc~ plans and ~ be ~ to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency w#h any parkway landKaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
,/
13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander-
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and inteneilled landscaping, is required aicng
14. Landscaping and in'tgation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the deveicper.
15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
16. Tree. maintenance criteria shall be developed and sul:x11ilted for Clly Planner review and
aPlxOval prior to issuance of building perm#~. These cr#eria shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree spacia$.
sc- 2/91
17. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to consewe water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chel;Xer 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
5 o[ [2
/ /
___/ /
/ /
/ /
/
F. Signs
The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.
Any signs proposed for this deveioprnent shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any
signs.
2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for CiP/Planner review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance ol building peri. ifs.
G. Environmental
The deveiopar shall provide each pmspactive buyer wdtlen notice o! the Fourth Street Rock
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard tormat as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway
project in a standard lotmat as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level ot interior noise
altenuation to below 45 CNEL the building materials and construction techniques provided,
and if appropriate, verify the edequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformanoe with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencle~
,/ 1. Emergencyseconcla~/accessshallbeprovldeclinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire
Protection District Standards.
o
Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance Ires and clear, a minimum of 26 test wide
at all times during constxuction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
Prior to issuance of building permits for con~stibie construction, evidence shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temperas/water supply for
fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system.
The app#car~ shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to cleten~lne tha appropriate type and
location of mail boxes. Muitt-fam#y residential clevelo9men~ shall provide a solid overfiead
structure for mail boxes with adequate IigNing. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overheed structure shall be sul~ect to Cib/Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permils.
/ /
_J /
_J /
/ /
__/ /
/ /
_J /
/ /
, / /
SC ~ 2/91
For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all
supportive information, shall be o~alnsd from the San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
6 of 12
/ /
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (714) 989-1863, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L Site Development
~/ 1. The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted Uniform Bulk:ling Code, Uniform Mechani-
cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Co~e, and all other applica131e codes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
contact the Building and Safety Division for copies O4 the Code Adoption Ordinance and
applical3la handouts.
Prk~r to issuance of builcling permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition
to existing unit(s), the appticant Shallpey devalopment fees at the estaplished rate. Such fees
may include, but are not limited to: City BeautJfication Fee, Part< Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and Scl'~<)l Fees.
Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or inclust~tal development or
addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development lees at the
estaplished rate. Such lees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
4. Street addresses shall be provided bythe Building Official, alter tract/parcal map recordation
and prior to issuance of building permits.
/ /
.__/ /
__/ /
J. Existing Structurll
/ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the properly line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistivenoss o4 existing buildings.
~" 2. Existing buildings shall be rnede to corn~y with co~ect building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, fllkJd and/or capped to comply with the
Uniform Plurrd:)ing Code and Uniform Building Code.
4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and sl~wn on building plans sul3mitted for
building permit application.
/ /
K. Grading
Grading O4 the subject I:)m~rty shall be in accordarx~ with I~ Uniform Building Code, City
Grading Standards, and a~Ol~ad grading practices. The tinal grading ~ shall be in
substantial conlon'nance ~ the appmvad grading plan.
2. A soils report shaft be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to
3. The deveiopment is located within the soil erosion control bounclartes; a Soil Distud3ance
Permit is requirod. Please corlac~ Sin1 ~ Courty De9~,,,~nt of Ag~uiture at (714)
387-2111 for permit aPG)licstion. Documem~tion of ~:~ permit sl~l be submitted to the City
pdor to the issuance O4 roug~ grading permit.
4. A geological report Shall be prepared I:)y a qua#fled engineer or geologist and su13rnitled at
tim time of al:q31ication for grading plan chock.
5. The final grading plans shall be corn~letod and aGq:)rovodl:MOr to issuance O4 building penTtitS.
sc - 2/91
7Of 12
/ /
6. As a custom4ot suioaivision, the following requirements snail :3e met:
a. Surety ~ail be Postecl and an agreement executee guaranteeir~ corraletlon of all on-s~te
clrainage facilities ne~e~a~/for clewatofing all parcels to tr~e satisfaction of the Builaing
aria $atety Division prfor to final ma~ a,a0mval ancl pncr to the issuance of graaim3 permits.
~. Ap!OmlXlatl easements for sate disposal of drainage water tibet are careuctKI onto
or over acllacent Darceis, am to ee delineatm:l aria recorcled to trm satisfaction of
Builaing am:l Safety Division Ixior to Muance of graalng and I=ui~ng permits.
c. On-site clrainage imomvements, necessary for clewat~lng and IXOteCting the sutxlivk:lKI
Ixopertias, are to Ix installeel prio~ to issuance of building Ixrm~ for construction ul:xm
any parcat tidal may ~ sulkier to drlinlge flmvl I~llnng. leaving. or w41~i~ a parcel
relative to w'fiic~ a building permit is rlq~llt~l.
d. Final grading I~an~ for eKtt Darnel are to be aubm~tea to ttm Bulkling aml Satiny
Division for al:~ov~l lair to mauance of I~ilding and gra~ng Dam~tL (This may be on an
incremental or camgaMe Daais.)
APPUCANT ~.IALL CONTACT THE ENG/NEElIIII~ DIVISION, ff14) MI-111~ FOR COMPLIANCE
wm, I THE FOLLOWING CONOmON~:
4dlr. ltlon im:l VINCulIr ~
/ /
__/ /
.__/ /
__/ /
1. Rigl~ll-of.way and II#mintl tl%11 bl X(/';I~I~ I0 the City f~ d ~ puMc struts,
facJl#i# as shown on me I~ane aml/a~ ternalive meg. I=~vle e'~l.,J.a for n~
fac~ifi (cm~-Im draJnNe, IK~ fNa~ tinill, elc.) ~tH be r#efvea a~ town on the l~ans
and/or tem~h~e mlp.
2. Dedication $1~11 I:~ ~ M Ifil fogowing rloNI.M.we/ MI Ult Wet I~r~s~
__/ /
~11 fNt on
tOtll IW Mt
3. An' irtlvoCal~ offlr M dedJclli~ IM
for ml p~vme strom m dnvH.
-faro W We/ea~mef~ sr~ ee rnacte
4. Non-ve~:uW aceeu U~I tm aeae. ma to me City tin, the ~ rameta:
SC - 2/91
· 6. Prwate clrainage easements for cross-to! dratnage snail De prov<lecl anct snail or noted On me final maD.
7. The final rr~ $ttall ellarty cleftMate a 10-foot minimum buik:lir~3 restriction area on me
ne~gt~odng lot edjoining tM Zero lot line wall ar<l contain the following language:
'~q/~s I~y o~dicate to ~l~e ¢i~/ of Ranct~ ¢ucamonga the ng~t to prol~it~t the
c:onst~ucti~n of (t~sid~ntial) I~ufi~inga (or otl~r structuras) witl~/n ~IMaa areas clas~gna~ed
on t~e m&o ~ ~uil~ing re~tricfion areas.°
A maintenance agreement st~all also 13e granted from each lot to tyro adjacent lot tnrougrt the
¢C&R's.
All exiffilng Ilsamlnt~ lying w~hm fulura dgl~tl-~f-way $1~lll !=~ quRcloiml<l or delineated on
tl~e final maD.
9. Easements for I~l~llo $iclew.lkl and/or stm~ trcel ~ out~ida the I~l~lo rigl'~-ol-way .~/
srm# I=e cle~,m~l to the City wMrev~' t~y encm~c~ on~ ixlvote I~rty.
~ 0. Aclaltional mr#t rigN-of.way srmll i~ dm~,ated along dg~t turn lan~, to Ixovide a minimum ~ .
of 7 foot meaeur~:l from the face of curbe. If cuff) adllcent lidewak I~ used along the nght
turn lafio, a Olrldlol strom trN mllntm~nce ca#mint ~ IM
/ /
11. The cloveloOM' M'tlll rrtlke I good filth a#orl !o ll:x3uire the raquif~ off-Me prOI31Ry interaCtS
nece~a~ to oonotmol the required puOiio impmvemenl~, and II he/Ihe should fail to 0o ~o,
me cleveiopM s~aN, m least 120 clays I~or IO ~ M the ~al m~p ~o~ aDOreval, enter
into an agraernest to temple the b,(,~Vl.,J,111 pUrlu~n~
to m~ire t~ off-sEe ~ i~emll r~
for a ~ff~n ~ ~ ~ s~l ~ m t~
__/ /
¥. Str~ ImpmvWl
All I~iC i,,q.~vvl,,~l.'tll (linedot itreMI, drllfilOe faOillM~, community trial, pa#os,
lancl~ areal. Mo.) ahown on tile l;llnl IfiWot tW raM) Iltll be conltructeci to
City Standard. IntM~o,' ~ k,~w,k,~t,,~l.~11 ~ il~, ~ Ill tim lifi'dlld IO. cuff) &M
gUt:at, AC ~v~m~l. ~ alNm)ncl~. t'~[~" -, ~t ligl~. ~tl ~tmM tm~.
2. A minimum M ~ 10(:14 widl pi~,,.,, I,t Mlhin · 40 -foM ~ red:: *ld dgfit..M-wly till he
conslmcl~l fM MI MII-Mlliml ~
3. Conmft~ ~ Iolow~g pl(~41M treM impmvlm~ntl Include. ~ n~ linMt~l to:
ST~L"T Iq.4M~ CUN~ · A,C. M~I; DRIVt STRr, EF STI~ZT
OUTTEl ~ WALK APPIt IJOI4'TB TRr, K~
COMIL ~ OTHER
TRNI. ~t,AND,
__/ /
i~1oles: (a) M~<~ian islar~l in~lucles lan<~s~,n~ an~l irrK~ation on meter I~) ~ve~nen!
re<~nstPJC~on anti overlays will I~e ~eterm~nacl ~unn~ plan ¢l~e~.J<.
walk $1~el1131 c~ilineer pit STD. 304. (el) It so n"~k~l. an in-lieu of construction tee snail
be I:)rovidld for this item.
. 4. Improvement pier, S and constnJction:
Street improvement I~an8 inck. ldin~ street trees and street liglNt$, prepared t)y a re(gis-
lered Civil Engineer. shaJi be 14jl~'titted to and a13provecI I~ ~l City Engineer. Security
$1%111 be I:X)sted and an agreement executed to tM ~m~ac~ion of the City Engineer and
tl'm City Altorosy gum"enleeing com~elion ol the I~l~c, taxi/or i~rtv~te street impmve-
mef~S. p~rto final m~ ~gmv~i or tl'm ie~uence of t~ilcllng pm'mRL wl~ionever occurs
fir~.
__/ /
Prior to any work being pedom~l in pu~ rlgN-ef-wly, fee~ ~ be paid and a
conetftl~tlon permit SMII be o~lirled from the C~ Enginem'l Qfftoe in acidilion to any
other pernuts reClU~'ed.
__/ /
c. Pavement strlplng, marking, trlffk:. street name aigfiing, arid Intemolv~ condul
sM# be installed Io tim laltlfac~ion of Ifte City Engineer.
._./ /
Signalcofidljit witit pulll~xll M I~ ifiltlit~ on Ifiy newol~ltru~t~n Ot rec=estruction
of major, seemeaty or co.ecrm st~ ~ ime~ec~ w~h mher maim, secondary or
COlII¢IO~ ~trlel$ t~' ful~rl tr~ic sign~11. I~1 I~xes ~ be ~ on ~ ~les o! tM
street ~t 3 feet m~tside of BC R. ECR o~ m~y a~ef lec, mlm~ ~mvea by tim City Engineer.
_./ /
( 1 ) NI pun I:X)xe$ Stlall I:)e NO. e ulllell oflNelwJle ~ by IM CII~ Engineer.
(2) Conduit ~all be 3-i~ galvm~tzed moel with pullrope.
whe.~ c~mY ramp. f."ml be imml.d on al ,our mme~ of ~.ruak)m pe City
Stanclarcls or t~ cli~ed by the Cily Enginere.
_.J /
Ex'mting ¢ily m~l~ reeling c=~In,mllan ~ mm~in oOen I~ tmlltc ~1 ~11 times w~
rerundee ugon c~,,,g~t~ a~ trm a~'mmcli~n te I~ t. "~a '~n of tl~ Cty Engineer,.
__/ /
g. Conc~m~l~l~ ~ ~al ne~ ~ ~'~&-~" t_ Und~ $k~wM~ clraim sl~l be __/ /
inmm~l I~ Cly ~' ~I, exc~X k~ ~ f~/~
n. Hlfidk:ll) I1=111 riled design N~11 be II Ipecdlecl I)y tM ¢11y F. nglnem'.
/ /
i. Stmetnamee~hd~.yp.,,~edbymeCityPlameqxtortoaXx~dtalfocfimlXancMcx --/ /
S. Sireel i,,,p,v~e., I.d IX~rtl psi' Cty ~fQcal ICXtv~ litNil ll'talbe~ for
revmvard epical Oythe Cily Enginere. Pfimtoany wQd~beingpitdlc,,,,~donme
vm mrsera. fees~tmlbepadanammtmak)n~n.lb. Qemin.dfmmtMCRY
Engine~'s Office in addition to any omef Ipeff~8 required.
6. $1r#t trees, a minif~jm ad 1S-gallon azl o4, I~, shill be i~111111Cl plf Cily Slimliras ;n
ac__/~_ f<lance with tM City's street tree program.
lI i
sc. 2/eL tool'
7. litterSection line of site cle$~n$ snail ~)e rewewe<~ I~y me Crty En<~,neer tar conformance
a. On collector or larger streets, lines of $K31~ sl~all t)e 131otle~ for all i:)~oject intersections,
including clfivlway8. Walls, $Nons, al'Hi slopes snail I:)e Iocate<l outall ie tl~a lines o! Sqht.
LarHi~.~oi~tg and oilier olc)~tn. JCtlons wdl~in the lines o! s~ght $l~al113e approve<t 13y tl~e City
Engineer.
l..oca! residlfifial street irlte~lction~ s1'411 have thei~ nolicei~ility improved, ua4.1ally by
moving the 2 +/. close~ street trees on aacl~ side away from tim street and placed in a street
tree easement.
.__/ /
8. A permit shall 13e o~ained from CALTRANS for any wad< within the following d~llt-of-way: _.._/ /
9. All I:)ublic iml:xovemerltS on ~ lollowing slrit!s ~ be OG~fitlonllly coil'libel prior to the
issuance of building permits:
/ /
N. PUl)Ile Maintenance Ariel
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per E~glneedng Publk= Wod~ $tinclard~
sl~all be su4~n~ed to the City Engif~lr for review and Ipl)mvll lunar tO finll mip aOgmval
or issuance of building perreda, whichever octurn firm. The following LlfidlClOe peAways.
medianS, pasoos. easements, trails. or offtar areas are flquirid to be annexed into the
Landscape Maintenance OisMct:
2. A signed consent and waiver form to ioin ar'~l/or form the ap~tt I.andecalpe and Lagging
Districts sl~lll be filed with t~t City Erlgifillr Dd~'tO fl~l m~o II:]l]~vllor alii. lanCe O! 13Uilclindg
permits whchever oCCUrS first. Fondilion ~ ~ IM home by the clevoiooer.
3. All re~Jimcl ~l~Ic ~a~ and tmgatio~ ~yam ~ be c~anueu~/ma~ained ~ the
c~eve~ urml aCC~l~l ~ ~e City.
4. Pareway ~and~'~.'ng on the le41ewing ~'~t(.) shal ~ to ~ ten,Ils el t~ r~OectJve
.__/ /
.__/ /
/ /
O. Ofllflgt and Fk)ed Coral91
The prolea (o~ I=e~en~ t~) is tm:ated w~l~ a Reed Hazam Zeee; theme'e. flood
~otec~on mamaurea ~ I~ ~ u c~tmed ~ a rig~ttta,4 ~ Engineer aria
2. It shin 1=4 the dOv~p.f't mmonU~ty to ~ tim (W FIRM Zonl
aes~gnmJon r~ved from the
necessary ro0ofis, I:)i&'~, af'uS n;cb,.Jc g' :?l,/(b.t a~ C1~/at~ ~ I. A C, QctaltiOtlil t,4~toc
of IdaO I:lavo$cn (CLOMR) ~ I:e o01ained from FEMA ~ to tlfisI map al:q)mvlt or
issuance of Ixjilding pef1"~s,
I~ issued by FEMA
A final drainage stucty sha# IM su0mitted to and a00mved Ioy aw Cly Erqir~ 1:4,ior to final
mad ~ipGcoval or tl'te 0ssuance ot ouiicling pefTnds, whiCi~vet occurs firM. NI clri~a~o
facfiit~s sha# be ,nstall~:J as reclu,rl~ Oy the City Enga'teef'.
~C. 2/91
It oft2
/ /
4. A permit from t~e Cour~y Floo(3 Control [~istr~ct ~$ requ~rect tot work w~m ,ls r~gnt-of-way
5. Trees are prortil~itea witl~in 5 feet of tl~e out$Cle ctiameter of any I~u01ic storm (:irain ~13e
measurecI from tl~a outer e~e of a mature tree trunk.
6. Pul~ sto~n clrain eaeement$ slyall 13e gra~ecl to convey overflows in the event of a
t~lockage in a sum~ catcl~ I~lin on tt~e puO#c street.
P. Utllltlee
1. Provcle SoDarate utility services to eacl~ gamel including sanitary sewerage System, water,
gas, electric 13ower, telegl~one, and calve I'V (all unaefground) in a-~,~rclance w~n the Utility
Stanaaras. Easements shall I:)e providal ~1 re¢lUirl¢l.
/ /
....J
/ /
2. The clevelmxr shall ~ raslx)nsil:)ie for the rlIecatton of existing utilities a~ necessary.~ /
V~ 3. Water and sewer ~ sl~all I=e claslgned and cenmmcte<l to meet t~e rGirlments of tl~e / /
Cucamongl County Water Oil*dlCl (CCWO). RlnC~ ~ Fi~e l=~lectl~n District.
and trte Environmental Helltft Department ol the C(wnly a4 ~ln Bemmaino. A letter at
coml~iance from ttle CCWD i~ recluimcl I:)fior to final ~ alX~lovll or I~uince a4 permits,
wrticl~ever octurn first.
Q. GenMll RMtuIrement~ ~cI Al~rov~11
one H~l ~f to i~l~ ~ ~ ~
2. ~ e~m for a ~ use d~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~a or ~ /
3. Prior to a;gmval of trm final rnag · clel)olil IIill I=e polled w'Wt ~e City ooveW~ the
estimmecl CGSl Of al:~erttening the iMesMTiMI uricIra )4Mim~enl Oiltrk:t
among tr~e newly createcl parnell
EtManda/San Sivame AMa Regimqal Mainline, ~ Regienll, ancl Maater Plan
Ortonage Fees st~ ~e gld p~m to fh~11 ml~ ~l~mVll m' pmc to ~u~g gem~l ~luance
__/ /
__/ /
5. Perm4s sMI t)e oOlamed ham me k)laMng ~ Im were wtlm tt~' rtgtl-a4-waY: ---./ /
6. A signed MInd wllW//Mm to join InCl/M ~ tile LIW EMG.,_ I,,,.I.~ CAmlT~nity
Faa#liel ~ M I~ Mid wlttt tl~ Cly EngineM imm to Ilnli mlg IglX~VlJ m tM
Oevek~w.
__/ /
2/91
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-38 - WILKINSON - A request to establish
an administrative and office use on 3 acres of land in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak
Street - APN: 209-144-80.
BACKGROUND: The applicant proposes to develop the site for a two-story office
building with a floor area of approximately 33,000 square feet. He is
requesting approval of the land use entitlement in order to secure the loan
for the project. The applicant is working with staff in preparing detailed
plans, elevations, etc., for a Development Review application, which will be
submitted shortly. Exhibit "C" shows a concept of the site plan.
ANALYSIS:
ae
Site Characteristics and Surrounding Land Uses: The site is part of the
Rancho Cucamonga Business Park II as shown in Exhibit "B." It is vacant
and relatively flat. The street improvement along Arrow Route and Red Oak
Street are completed except for sidewalk. To the north and west are
vacant fields. To the south are existing small industrial buildings. To
the east is a large industrial building.
Compatibility of Use: In reviewing the proposed office land use, staff
analyzed it to determine whether it is compatible with surrounding
existing and future land uses. The area north of Arrow Route between
Utica Avenue and White Oak Street, which is in Subarea 7 of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan, is planned for a mix of uses such as administrative
and offices, medical and health care services, professional services,
restaurants, light industrial uses, financial, insurance and real estate
services, etc. The site relates mainly to Arrow Route which is developed
with predominantly multi-tenant office complexes. Staff believes that the
vacant parcels on the south side of Arrow Route, between Utica Avenue and
White Oak Street, could be used as a transition from the light industrial
uses to the south and the administrative and office uses to the north.
Furthermore, in January 1992 the Commission approved a Conditional Use
Permit (Conditional Use Permit 91-26) for a future office complex located
on the south side of A~row Route, east of White Oak Street. Staff does
not anticipate that the development of the site for office use will create
any land use conflict.
ITEM B
pLANNING COMMISSION
CUP 93-38 - WILKINSON
September 22, 1993
Page 2
Environmental Assessment: Staff determines that the proposed conditional
use request is not subject to environmental review. However, the
development of the site will require environmental review according to
California Environmental Quality Act.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Conditional Use Permit 93-38 through adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
BB:NF:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Concept
Resolution of Approval
KB & ASSOCIATES
REAL ESTATE SERVICES
9650 BUSINESS ('ENTER DR,
P~ANCHO CUCA.MONGA. CAL. 91730
TELEPHONE (714) 980-7740
August 18, 1993
Nancy Fong
Senior Planner
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729
RE: Conditional Use Permit for office building at the S.E. corner
of Red Oak Str. and Arrow
Dear Nancy,
This Project is planned as an administrative office building
totalling 33,000 s.f. on approximately 3.0 acres. All the
surrounding infrastructure improvements are in and the lot has been
partially improved.
The building will be designed as a two story facility using
concrete till-up construction and glass as the major elements.
The facility will have approximately 120-150 employees all working
the normal 5 week day from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
The reason for the C.U.P. is because this is an office use in
I.S.P. area # 8 -- a General Industrial land use Category.
In the future I would suggest that the city consider changing the
I.S.P. in this area to allow office use as a permitted use. This
is consistent with both the Special Boulevard status in the area
and the overall existing office use character along this corridor.
P, ~. 4?/2-3
TR 204
o
®
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-38 FOR ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE AND
OFFICE USE ON 3 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT, SUBAREA 8 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN,
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED
OAK STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 208-144-80.
A. Recitals.
(i) Wilkinson has filed an application for the issuance of the
Conditional Use Permit No. 93-38 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street with a street frontage of
757 feet and lot depth of 259 feet and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north is vacant, the property to the
south is developed with small industrial buildings, the property to the east
is developed with industrial buildings, and the property to the west is
vacant.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows~
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the
district in which the site is loca~d~
PLANNING cOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-38 - WILKINSON
September 22, 1993
Page 2
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15052(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below:
Plannin~ Division
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if building permits are
not issued or approved use has not commenced
within 24 months from the date of approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Steven Ross, Assistant Planner
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-37 - TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL - A
request to establish an animal hospital within a 1,500 square
foot leased space in an existing shopping center in the
Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned
Community, located at 10598 Base Line Road, Suite F - APN: 1076-
481-35.
BACKGROUND:
Discussion and Analysis: The applicant is proposing to establish an
animal hospital for small animals, such as household pets, within the
Terra Vista Village shopping center. Such uses are permitted within
Neighborhood Co~nercial Districts subject to the review and approval of
a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Co~nission.
The applicant plans to occupy a 1,500 square foot corner unit in a
building located at the southeast corner of the shopping center. A
dentist, optometrist, photo lab and tanning salon occupy other suites in
the building. As the applicant states in his letter, the veterinary
office will provide for all the necessary medical, surgical, and dental
needs of the patients. This is not a board and care facility. The
office will be open from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday
and 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Saturday. A total of three employees
will staff the office. Other veterinary clinics are located in similar
shopping centers in the City and staff is not aware of land use use
conflicts with the other tenants.
Be
Parking: In March 1993 the City's parking regulations were amended to
require 4.5 parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable
area for shopping centers built prior to the change. Shopping centers
may lease up to 10 percent of the area to office users (including
medical and dental). Below is a breakdown of the office users within
Terra Vista Village:
Office User Square Footage
Jenny Craig 2,100
Dentist 1,082
ITEM C
PLANNING CO~94ISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 93-37 - TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL
September 22, 1993
Page 2
Office User
Optometrist
Tarbell Realtors
Terra Vista ~-~mal Hospital
Total
Shopping Center
Total Leasable Floor Area
10 percent of Total
Total Parking Spaces Available
Square Footage
1,120
4,802
1,500
~0,604 (less than 7.8 percent)
134,949
13,495
704
Staff does not foresee any problems with the proposal because no land
use conflicts have been experienced with existing veterinary clinics and
animal hospitals in other shopping centers, and there is adequate
parking available within the shopping center.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), because there is
no possibility that the proposal will have a significant effect on the
environment.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item have been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and written notices were
sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the property as well as
businesses within the shopping center.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Planning Commission approve
Conditional Use Permit 93-37 through adoption of the attached Resolution of
Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
BB:SR:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter From Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan
Resolution of Approval
Dr. Michael C. Weigand, Jr.
862 Decatur
Claremont, CA. 91711
July 29, 1993
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Conditional Use Application
Dr. Michael C. Weigand, Jr.
Terra Vista Village
Rancho Cucamonga, CA.
To Whom It May Concern:
The business to b~ considered for a Conditional Use Permit is that of a full-service veterinary
hospital. The hospital will provide care for only small animals. There will be no provision
made for the care of horses, catfie, sheep, goats or any other animals routinely considered as
"farm" animals on these premises.
The facility shall be so equipped as to provide for all of the individual patients medical,
surgical and dental needs, as deemed appropriate by the veterinarian. However, these
premises are not to be considered as a full-service emergency clinic. Therefore, the hours of
operation will conform with those considered as regular business hours (e.g. Monday-Friday,
8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. and Saturday, 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.). The support staff shall be
comprised of a full-time receptionist and veterinary I~chnician.
Please contact the undersigned should there be any questions or comments, at (909) 625-6682.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely, ~
Dr. Michael C. Weigand, Jr.
T
TEN
LA,'~ D.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-37 FOR AN ANIMAL HOSPITAL WITHIN A 1,500
SQUARE FOOT LEASED SPACE IN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER
LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-481-35.
A. Recitals.
(i) Michael C. Weigand, Jr. has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-37 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 10598 Base
Line Road, Suite F, a 1,500 square foot leased space within the Terra Vista
Village shopping center at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven
Avenue; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is a
shopping center, the property to the south of that site consists of single
family residential, the property to the east is single family residential, and
the property to the west is a shopping center.
(c) No significant land use conflicts have been experienced
between animal hospitals and other tenants in similar shopping centers,
therefore, none are expected with this application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-37 - TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL
September 22, 1993
Page 2
(d) The City Planner has determined that animal hospitals
require a Conditional Use Permit within Neighborhood Commercial Districts of
the Terra Vista Planned Community.
(e) The application contemplates the operation of an animal
hospital which will provide complete medical, surgical, and dental care for
small animals (i.e., household pets).
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each. and every condition set forth below:
Plannin~ Division
l)
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if building permits are
not issued or approved use has not commenced
within 24 months from the date of approval.
2) Approval is granted only for medical, dental,
and surgical treatment of small animals,
excluding farm animals.
3) The facility shall be operated in conformance
with the performance standards of the district.
4)
If operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
such as noise, odor, or parking, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for reconsideration and
possible termination of the use.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-37 - TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5)
Occupancy of the facility shall not commence
until such time as all Uniform Building Code
and State Fire Marshal regulations have been
complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The building shall be
inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
6)
Any signs shall comply with the requirements of
the approved Uniform Sign Program for the
shopping center.
7) The applicant shall obtain a business license
from the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
s)
The landscaping and parking areas around the
suite shall be kept clear of animal droppings.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at s regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES= COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-26 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to permit
a liquor store and delicatessen of 2,700 square feet in Building 7
(7,739 square feet) of previously approved Conditional Use Permit
91-24, located on 27 acres at the southwest corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Rochester Avenue in the Industrial Park District
(Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan -
APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-33 - MA$I PARTNERS - A request to permit
the sales of tea, coffee, books, magazines, and newspapers in 1,000
square feet in Building 7 (7,739 square feet) of previously
approved Conditional Use Permit 91-24, located on 27 acres at the
southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-34 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to permit
a florist of 1,000 square feet in Building 7 (7,739 square feet) of
previously approved Conditional Use Permit 91-24, located on 27
acres at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester
Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26
through 28.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-35 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to permit
a hair and nail salon of 1,000 square feet in Building 7 (7,739
square feet) of previously approved Conditional Use Permit 91-24,
located on 27 acres at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Rochester Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of
the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and
26 through 28.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to permit
a dry cleaners of 2,000 square feet in Building 7 (7,739 square
feet) of previously approved Conditional Use Permit 91-24, located
on 27 acres at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Rochester Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, and 26
through 28.
ITEMS D,E,F,G,H
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 93-26, 33, 34, 35, 36- MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
PROJECT' AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
ae
Action Requested by Applicant: The applicant is requesting a series of
non-construction Conditional Use Permits for the previously approved
CUP 91-24 (see Exhibit "A"). Conditional Use Permits 93-33 through 36 are
classified as "Convenience Sales and Services" within the Industrial Area
Specific Plan (ISP) which is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7.
Conditional Use Permit 93-26 (liquor store and delicatessen) is classified
"Food and Beverage Sales" which is also conditionally permitted in
Subarea 7.
B. Site Characteristics:
The vacant site is approximately 27 acres in size and is the site of a
previously approved project consisting of 32 buildings (see
Exhibit "A"). The northern portion of the site is currently in the
process of undergoing several minor modifications to the site plan and
building footprints. The revised site plan is indicated in Exhibit "B."
The proposed non-construction CUP's are all located in Building 7.
C. Parking Calculations:
The northern portion of the project site east of Masi Drive, which is
essentially the same as the original proposal, has been considered
separately for the purpose of calculating required parking (see
Exhibit "D"). Because of the extensive amount of restaurant use in the
northern half of the site and the potential for conditionally permitted
retail and quasi-retail uses, the parking has been calculated utilizing
the more stringent scenario under the shopping center parking ratio of 5
spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable floor area:
Type of Use:
Square Footage
Restaurant:
Jack in the Box (Bldg. 3)
Undetermined (Bldg. 4)
Old Spaghetti Factory (Bldg. 5)
Denny's (Bldg. 6)
Total Restaurant Footage
Percentage of total
2,770
5,000
13,000
4,880
25,650
22 percent *
*Note: 15 percent (17,250 square feet) of the total square footage is
allowed for restaurant use without an additional requirement.
Other
Bldg. 11 41,041
Bldg. 12 14,284
Bldg. 13 20,688
Bldg. 7 7,739
Bldg. 4 5,600
Subtotal 89,352
GRAND TOTAL 115,002
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 93-26, 33, 34, 35, 36 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
Type of Use
Shopping Center
Additional Restaurant
Total
ANALYSIS:
Number of Number of
Square Parking Spaces Spaces
Footage Ratio Required Provided
115,002 5/1000 575
8,400 1/100 84
659 664
ae
General: Conditional Use Permit 91-24 was approved by the City Council on
September 2, 1992.
Conditional Use Permit 93-26 is for a liquor store and delicatessen (see
Exhibit "C") of 2,700 square feet. Approximately 40 percent of the area
will be devoted to the sale of liquor, while the remainder will be
utilized for the delicatessen and sale of other convenience items. No
seating is proposed and the sale of food and beverage is for off-site
consumption only. Proposed hours of operation are from 7 a.m. to 2 a.m.,
seven days a week. Number of anticipated employees is one to two.
Conditional Use Permit 93-33 is for the sale of tea, coffee, magazines and
newspapers and has a floor area of 1,000 square feet. N_~_o seating is
requested with this use and sale of all beverages is for off-site
consumption. Potential hours of operation are 8 a.m. to midnight, seven
days a week, with one to two employees.
Conditional Use Permit 93-34 is for a florist shop. Potential hours of
operation for this use will be from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m., with one to two
employees.
Conditional Use Permit 93-35 is for a hair/nail salon. Six hair stations
and five nail tables in 1,000 square feet will be provided. Hours of
operation will be from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., with four to five employees.
Conditional Use Permit 93-36 is for a dry cleaners and is located in 2,000
square feet. Hours of operation are from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., with one to
two employees.
Because of the adequate amount of parking in the northern half of the
site, staff does not anticipate a problem with parking or conflicts with
the types of uses proposed for Building 7. The uses are complementary to
each other.
Environmental Assessment: Staff has determined that the Negative
Declaration previously issued for CUP 91-24 on the same site is sufficient
for these Conditional Use Permits.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 93-26, 33, 34, 35, 36 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 4
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Cormmission to approve the
project, the following facts for findings must be made:
The proposed uses are in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of
the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the
puTposes of the district in which the site is located.
The proposed uses, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will
not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
C. The proposed uses comply with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the project has been posted, and
notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~ends that the Co~nission approve these
Conditional Use Permits through the adoption of the attached Resolutions.
BB:BN:sp
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" -
Exhibit "B" -
Exhibit "C" -
Exhibit "D" -
Resolution of
Resolution of
Resolution of
Resolution of
Resolution of
CUP 91-24 Site Plan
Revised Partial Site Plan
Space Allocation/Floor Plans
Parking Calculations
Approval with Conditions for CUP 93-26
Approval with Conditions for CUP 93-33
Approval with Conditions for CUP 93-34
Approval with Conditions for CUP 93-35
Approval with Conditions for CUP 93-36
L
C
C
[i '
u ~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-26 FOR A 2,700 SQUARE FOOT LIQUOR
STORE/DELICATESSEN LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK
DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-
Oll-lO, 19, 21, AND 26 THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-26, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250
feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester
Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports Complex, the
property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property tO the west is
vacant; and
(c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
(d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7
and is classified as a "Food and Beverage Sales."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-26 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows=
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15-61(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below.
Planning Division
Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions
as well as the Fire District for review and
approval prior to occupancy.
21
Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
ordinances.
3)
If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to noise, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-26 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5)
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if the building permits
are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
6)
All sale of alcoholic beverages and
delicatessen items shall be for off-site
consumption only.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-33 FOR A 1,000 SQUARE FOOT ESTABLISHMENT
SELLING COFFEE, TEA, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, AND NEWSPAPERS
LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF
THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, AND 26
THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-33, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows~
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250
feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester
Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports .Complex, the
property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property to the west is
vacant; and
(c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
(d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7
and is classified as a "Convenience Sales and Service."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-33 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
{a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below.
Plannin~ Division
1)
Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions
as well as the Fire District for review and
approval prior to occupancy.
2)
Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
ordinances.
3)
If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to noise, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
4)
Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-33 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5)
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if the building permits
are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
6) All food and beverage sales shall be for off-
site consumption only.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITION~J~ USE
PERMIT NO. 93-34 FOR A 1,000 SQUARE FOOT FLORIST LOCATED
IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, AND 26
THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-34, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250
feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester
Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports Complex, the
property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property to the west is
vacant; and
(c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
(d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7
and is classified as a "Convenience Sales and Service."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-34 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below.
Plannin~ Division
1)
Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions
as well as the Fire District for review and
approval prior to occupancy.
2)
Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
ordinances.
3)
If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to noise, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
4)
Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-34 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5)
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if the building permits
are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-35 FOR A 1,000 SQUARE FOOT NAIL AND HAIR
SALON IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, AND 26
THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-35, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250
feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester
Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant
the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports Complex, the
property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property tO the west is
vacan%; and
(c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
(d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7
and is classified as a "Convenience Sales and Service."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-35 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4 This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below.
Plannin~ Division
1)
2)
Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions
as well as the Fire District for review and
approval prior to occupancy.
Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
ordinances.
3)
4)
If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to noise, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideratiom
and possible termination of the use.
Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-35 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5)
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if the building permits
are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES=
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT=
COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-36 FOR A 2,000 SQUARE FOOT CLEANER/TAILOR
LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF
THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, AND 26
THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-36, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250
feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester
Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports Complex, the
property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property to the west is
vacant; and
(c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
(d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7
and is classified as a "Convenience Sales and Service."
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below.
Plannin~ Division
1)
Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions
as well as the Fire District for review and
approval prior to occupancy.
2)
Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
ordinances.
3)
If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to noise, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
4)
Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5)
Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if the building permits
are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to
the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
ATTEST:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS=
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1993
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 93-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An
amendment to allow additional monument signs for shopping centers.
BACKGROUND: On August 11, 1993, the Planning Con~aission directed staff to
initiate this amendment to address monument signs for shopping centers with
more than two street frontages. This discussion regarding the number and
location of shopping center monument signs originated during the review of a
Conditional Use Permit request for a health club in the Thomas Winery Plaza.
ANALYSIS: The Sign Ordinance currently allows shopping centers to have
monument signs on two street frontages. The monument sign can identify the
name of the center and two tenants or identify three tenants (see Exhibit
"A"). Eight out of eighteen existing shopping centers (excluding regional
centers) within Rancho Cucamonga have three or more street frontages. For
example, the Thomas Winery Plaza and Foothill Village have three street
frontages; Central Park Plaza, Vineyards Marketplace, and Terra Vista Village
have four street frontages (see Exhibit "B").
The Planning Commission felt, and staff concurs, that signs benefit the
consumer and the community as a whole by making it easier to find
businesses. Therefore, staff believes it would be appropriate to modify the
limitation on the number of monument signs to provide greater flexibility on
sign location and to properly identify shopping centers and major anchor
tenants.
OPTIONS: In their discussions, the Comission indicated that monument signs
may not be appropriate on every street frontage. Staff explored the following
options:
Allow only on major, secondary or collector streets: This is
impractical because none of the eight centers would qualify based
upon-the General Plan, Specific Plan or Community Plan.
Allow only on streets of a certain length: For example, if we used
San Bernardino Road (Thomas Winery) as a base line, the minimum
street length would be 550 feet. Of the eight shopping centers
affected, the Victoria Village and Perry's Center would not meet this
criteria. Staff does not support this option because it would be
more restrictive than the current regulation.
ITEM I
PLANNING CO~ISSION STAFF REPORT
SOA 93-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 22, 1993
Page 2
Allow only on streets at the front or side of a shopping center, and
not allow on streets at the rear of a center. The "rear" is
difficult to define for shopping centers such as Central Park Plaza
and Terra Vista Village. In both centers, the site plan design is
such that the loading docks and service doors at the back side of the
center face streets which also provide window exposure and driveway
access. Staff does not support this option because it would prohibit
monument signs at key entry points for some shopping centers.
4. Allow a monument sign on each street frontage of a center.
Staff recommends that a monument sign be allowed on each street frontage of a
shopping center. In addition, staff believes that a new category of sign
should be created: "project identification monument" sign which incorporates
the name of the shopping center into architectural theme walls, such as at an
intersection (see Exhibit "C").
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the
attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council.
BB:DC:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Typical Monument Sign
Exhibit "B" - Shopping Center Site Plans
Exhibit "C" - Typical Project Identification Sign
Exhibit "D" - Planning Comission Minutes Dated August 11, 1993
Resolution of Approval
Ordinance
L
iI
.I
o¥ '~
I I
l
MIt, l.,,I :I'4 I
0o
HELMS AVE
I U~Id
1111
<;
COMMISSION BUSINESS
E. R~VIEW OF SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING NUMBER AND LOCATION OF MONUMENT SIGNS
Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated the Ltem was before the Commission as the
result of discussion at the last Planning Commission meeting regarding the
Thomas Winery.Center.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, observed that the Development Code allows one
monument sign per street frontage with a maximum of two monument signs for
Neighborhood Centers. He provided layouts of the eight centers in the City
which have more than two street frontages. He noted that Terra Vista Town
Center and Foothill Marketplace are permitted more monument signs because they
are considered Regional Centers.
Commissioner Melther stated he was in sympathy with Commissioner Vallette's
point of view that another sign on San Bernardino Road would be a benefit to
the Thomas Winery Center.
Commissioner Valle=re noted that Commissioner Tolltoy had also expressed
concerns that the hospital on Milliken above Foothill Boulevard also needed
more signage. She felt signage is a benefit to the consumer to indicate what
ie located in the center. She said the purpoze of the Sign Ordinance ie to
guard against an overabundance of signs and she did noC feel allowing
additional signage on frontage roads for the eight centers noted would be
contrary to the principles and the original thought pro=see of the Sign
Ordinance.
Commissioner Melther agreed that signage is a benefit to the consumer, thereby
benefiting the merchants. He acknowledged the Planning Commission has
concerns regarding aesthetics and visual quality of the community; but he felt
it is hard to find many of the smaller shops in some of the centers because
the shops are difficult to see and the signs are small and restricted. He
felt the ordinance should be readdressed.
Commissioner Tolstoy f~lt'that signs should be permitted on the ma~or entrance
s=reets, but not neClllarily at the backl of shopping centers. He felt
Central Park Plaza should not nlCellariLy have a lign on Elisha West.
Chairman McN£e[ agreed that ~here should not be a blanket opportunity to have
a monument sign on every street frontage. He noted that Victoria Village has
a third access off a small cul-de-sac street and he did not feel £t should
neceeser£1y have a monument sign. He suggested a ~orkehop to discuss the
matter. He thought monument signs can be attractive.
Commissioner ' ChitLea concurred. She felt there may be some appropriate
locations and noted the Code would need to be changed rathe=. ~han making
exceptions.
Brad Bullet, city PLanner, fell it would be approp=£ate for the Co~mission to
direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Sign Ordinance with language to
Planning Commission Minutes
-6-
August 11, 1993
benefit the consumer and provide additional monumentation for shopping center.
with more than two street frontages. He suggested there may he provisions
allowing monument sign identifying the center without identifying individual
tenants which would be permitted as exceptions and not be counted as monument
signs.
Commissioner Melcher requested that graphic examples be included with the
staff report.
Mr. Bullet responded that would be done and the matter would be brought back
to the Commission as soon as staff time permits.
F~ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN
Comm~sioner Melther felt the Commission should formally proceed with the
electiVeyen though new appointments have not been made for the Commission.
Me e~gge~d that the sitting Chairman and Vice Chairman be prevailed upon to
M~t~on: Moved ~Q Melther, seconded by Tolstoy to nominate Larry MeNill ae
Chairman and Suzanne ChitSea as Vice Chairman. Motion carried by the
following vote: ~
AY~E~ ~CO~I..S~.R.S: ~MITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N~ -carried
7:55 P M The Planni Co. ~ - ~ ~mm s~'on a~ d~our~ed t~a workshop at 8.00 p.m. on
August ll, 1993~ in the Rains Room regarding De ol~nent Review 93-13 and
Design Review for Tract 13316.
Brad Bulle~
Planning ¢omiseion Minutes
-7-
August 11, 1993
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 93-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MONUMENT SIGNS
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1:
following findings:
The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
That the Amendment will provide for development of a
comprehensively planned urban community within the
District that is superior to development otherwise
allowable under alternate regulations; and
That the Amendment will provide for development
within the District in a manner consistent with the
General Plan and with related development and growth
management policies of the City.
SECTION 2: The Commission finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Sign Ordinance
Amendment 93-01 to modify the Municipal Code per the
attached Ordinance.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY.'
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
SO 93-01 - SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
September 22, 1993
Page 2
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission gf the
City of Rancho'Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
ORDINANCE NO.
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT 93-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MONUMENT SIGNS.
A. Recitals
(i) On September 22, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the
above-referenced Sign Ordinance Amendment. Following the conclusion of said
public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. ,thereby
recommending that the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 93-01.
(ii) On , 1993, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said
hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 14.08.281 is hereby added to Chapter 14.08 to
read as follows, and all subsequent sections are renumbered accordingly:
14.080.281 Project Identification Siqn: "Project identification
sign" means a sign which identifies, in words and/or graphic logo, the theme
name of a development.
SECTION 2: Section 14.20.100, subsection 2. Business identification
(businesses within shopping centers), is hereby amended to read, in words and
figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A."
SECTION 3: This Council finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.