HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-180 - Resolutions REgOIL71~C~ NO. 92-180
A RESOU3TIC~ OF ~ CITY ~ OF ~HE CITY OF RANCID
~, CAT .rM~qIA, D~ql~G A ~DDIFICATIC~ TO
(I~D~~ USE PE~4IT NO. 91-03, PART C, FCR ~
EXPANSIC~ OF ~ME ~ OF OPERATIC~ ON FRIDAYS, LOCATe3
IN ~ ~DF - APN: 229-262-28
(i) James Page has filed an applicaticm for a modification to
Co~liticmal Use Permit No. 91-03 as described i~ the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit modifica-
(ii) On the 26th day of F~h~_ ~ry 1992, and continued to the 25th day
of Marc~ and the 8th day of April 1992, the Plann/ng C=mm~_~sion of the City of
Rancho ~ cc~%___~ a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on A~ril 8, 1992.
(iii) On the 8th day of A~ril 1992, the Planning Oummission revie~sd
the propoeal and staff's p~esentation and reoeived public testimony. At the
conclusion of the public hearing, the Plar~ ~ion directed staff to
prepare a Resolution of Denial for their m~eting of April 22, 1992.
(iv) On the 22nd day of April 1992, the Planning C~...{~sion reviewed
staff's presentation ar~ received public testimony. At the conclusion of the
public testhmx~, the Plannir~ C~m-t~sion adopted a Resolution of Denial, on
the application and concluded said hearing on April 22, 1992.
(v) On the 3rd day of June 1992, the City Oouncil conducted a duly
notioed public hearing on the application and co~cl,~_~k~___ said hearing on June
3, 1992.
(iv) Ail 1~3~ prere~,~-it~s prior to th. adoption of this
NOW, ~mREFCRE, th~ City Ommci~ of th~ City of Rancho Cucammzja does
hereby find, determine ar~ resolve as follow~:
1. ~ ~ion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set fcxTh in the Recitals, Part A, of this ~esolution are true and correct.
during the abov~-referenoed public hearing on Fe/xuary 26, Marc~ 25, and April
8, 1992, i~cl~ written a~d oral staff repc~t~, together with ~ublic
testimony, this ~ion hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) ~he application applies to uroperty located at 11530 Sixth
Street with a street ~ of 715.15 feet and lot depth of 593.83 feet ar~
is pr~serfcly i~oved with three re~M~ar~h a~d develo~mant buil~ and 760
Industrial; and
(c) The Indoor Wholesale/Retail Cu~_rcial Use is located
within a General Industrial zone Subarea 11 of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan. ~he General Industrial zc~e was intended to aocc~,,~date a wide range of
Typically, ~nistrative office, ~rofessional, and ~ wholesale/retail
DeveloF~_nt /_ndustrial Center was the fact that there wuuld not be any
conflict with the hours of operation of the general industrial usex~ withLn
the site with off-set hours of operation on w~kends c~_ly. The ancillary
nature of the indoor wholesale/retail c~m~c~ use on weekends only was
found to be consistent with the original intent of the General Im~ustrial
zone. This proposal to expand the hours of operation directly conflicts with
the intent of the General Industrial z~ne of the Industrial Specific Plan
would conflict with on-site business operations; and
(d) The orig/nal approval of the application w~s based on the
fact that the application would operate during different hours of o~ratic~ of
other current site and future ~usinesses. With the current proposal, hours of
operation on Fridays frc~ 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. would conflict with the
hours of operation of other site users, and adversely impact those ~usinesses;
(e) ~he propoeed hou~ of operation ~ conflict with the
utilizatio~ of parking facilities for other users within the site.
~=ing the above-referen~U ~ubli¢ h~aring anU upon th. ~=ific finUi.~ of
facts set forth in ~ragra~s 1 and 2 above, this C%-,mdssion here~ fir~s and
c~cludes as follcw~: .
(a) ~hat the proposed use is not in accord with the General
(b) ~hat the pro~ use, to~ with the
welfare ~r materially injurious to properties or i~ in the vicinity;
(c) ~at the prc~ use does not c~ly with eac~ of the
applicable p~-ovisic~s of the Develo~ Oode and Industrial Area Specific
Plan.
Resolutic~ No. 92-180
Page3
4. Based upo~ the findings and conclusions set forth in paragra~
1, 2, and 3 above, this ~ion hereby denies the application.
5. ~he Secr~ to t_his Council shall certify to the adoption of
PASS~D, APPROVED, and ADOPI~D t/Tis 17th day of June, 1992.
AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright
NOES: Nc~e
~u J. A~ams, City Clerk
I, DE~RA J. ADAMS, CITY c~RK of the City of Rancho (~,
California, do hereby certify that the fore~o~ Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and ~4~ted ~ the City Ocuncil of the City of Rancho O~mnnga,
Calif~a, at a regular meetir~ of said City Oma~cil held on the 17th day of
Ju~e, 1992.
E~ecuted this 18th day of June, 1992, at Rancho ~,
J. , ¢'~.ty Clerk