The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About92-151 - Resolutions RESOI/3TION NO. 92-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CZ~%~=A, CALTFO~F/A, OF P~.~f~f~RY APPROVAL OF CITY f~G~'S ~ REPORPS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINT~gANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 ~EAS, the City Oouncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting ~L~c of 1972, the City Eng~ is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenanoe and/or i~provement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and ~{fREAS, the city Engineer has made and filed with the city Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council barn duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said repc~t is sufficient and that said re~, nor any part thereof, requires or should be NC~ TH~{EfDRE, the city (kmmcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in .oDnnection there- with, conta~ in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams ~ the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of t/he subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminar- 3. ~%at the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportiu~ to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. ~hat said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1992/93 for the purposes of all PASS]H), ~, and ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1992. Resolution No. 92-151 Page 2 AYES: Alexander, Buquet, St~ut, Williams, Wright De/~-a J. ~, city Clerk I, DRRRA J. ADAMS, CITY ~.vRK of the City of Rancho Cucam~, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho (~, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held c~ the 6th day of May, 1992. Executed this 7th day of May, 1992, at P~ancho O~m~ncja, California. =]:~- A~ms, City Clerk Resol~ion No. 92-151 Page 3 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. ! (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 92J9~ The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereo0 on arterial streets. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #1 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals. In addition, because State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past to pay for various traffic signal activities, projected Maintenance and Operations costs are increasing by nearly $30,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #1 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 5 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 199~/95 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $62,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $5,470.00 General Liability $2,990.00 Electric Utilities $108.230.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $178,690.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $101,470.00 Delinquency Contingency $21.790.00 Total Revenue Required: $301,950.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover ( $20.00) Assessment Revenue Required: $301,930.00 Analysis: The most significant impacts on the proposed FY 92/93 budget are the increase of Maintenance and Operations of nearly $30,000 due to the elimination of a prior years State Gas Tax subsidy, and the increase in electricity charges due to an increase in street lights and traffic signals. FY 92/93 Assessment Rat~; For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $13.81. That is up $3.63 from the FY 91/92 rate of $10.18. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the distric~ Unit No. of Unit Rate/ L,ar~ Use T..vpe Unils Rate Facinr AU. Revenue Commercial Acre 3,291.07 $13.81 2 $27.62 $90,900.00 Single Family Parcel 15.281.00 $13.81 1 $13.81 ~ Total 18,572.07 $301,930.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 6 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 7 SLD1 ANNEXAT]ONS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192-1 26 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 DR 89-21 5 AU ANNEXED MAY 1. 1991 PM 7451 1.77 AU ANNEXED MAY 15, 1991 TR 13114 21 AU ANNEXED JUNE 19, 1991 PM 13825 27.74 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 CUP 88-28 1.04 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 TR 14866 47 AU ANNEXED OCTOBER 16, 1991 CUP 91-11 2.38 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14139 120 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14380 79 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14379 35 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 13351 118 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 13717 197 AU ANNEXED O£CEMBER 18, 1991 DR ~-09 1.06 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 18, 1991 COYOTE CANYON ELEM6.88 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PM 13113 2.0 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU ANNEXED ~ARCN 20, 1991 ~ 90-05 9.06 AU ANNEXED MARCH 6, 1991 TR 13351-1 8 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 CUP 89-26 9.92 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 TR 13945 35 AU ANNEXED JANUARY 15, 1992 DR 89-13 .93 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 19, 1992 DR 89-12 4.4 AU Resolution No. 92-151 Page 8 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 26 N.T.~. LEGEND CITY OF RANCHO CU4)AMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHi~]- "4" Resolution No. 92-151 Page 9 ~XHiBIT '&. -~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 /TE FOOTHI[[ BLVD. SPRUCE EUCA].. AVE. ~'HfFE ---- 'AR, ~ O W HWY.. · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO : STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR ~ 9- 2_ ~ Resol~ion No. 92-151 Page 10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO · 5782 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' ALTA -SPt'- ".£T'- Resolution No. 92-151 Page 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 12 EXHIBIT 'A' , ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE ,.)F CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ 208-261-20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~.~:~_ AvE CouNTy OF SAN BERNARDINO~... ~ ( Resolution No. 92-151 Page 14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OlSTRICT NUMBER I ,-'~'~ · I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I ! COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~i-~ I~! STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~1%~ I~1 - Resolution No. 92-151 Page 15 EXHII~IT ~SSESSMENT DIA, GFIAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~y//o 9/-// C~-~ ;: STATZ OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 .7,, llsI~x~ Page 16 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 17 , ~$$~$,~ '-.tit / \\ %\ TRA~T NO. t4~O0 ~ITY OP ~~.G~.~E.S. ~.C RANCHO ~U~AMON~ ~. ,..,. ~...,,.,~,__,~,__. TRACT NO. 14380 :, _. ~ Resolution No. 92-151 : A$$F$$MFNT OIAGI~A;,~ Page 18 ~KGFND 8r ~C~PF / II M I$ 19 I I$ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 19 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ,.EO/m~' ~vvO.~/~. ,~!~ : 62[9 S.~. " -~S$1rSllll1' DIIGE~II [,Ill)SCJLI~! IIAZllZI&ICX DISI'ZIC? lO. 4 TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 ) · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiN STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 20 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 21 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 22 ASS~SSJ{~ ~ ....(~}. :" TR. NO. 1 3V ;' ELi lVEl0l SPI0Cl IVII0! CHUICH SYREEY s"r.L,.,T(~I*(gS00 I,.UM.) ., · fA. 3 FA. ST. L..T~f'I*(5800 L,UM.) 12 r,A. ST. 'l*pl~lq(15 GAL.) 73 FA. 50 P.A. 18 FA. PARICW&y ~ZNG I?.30Q S.K. 9.400 S.F. 3.570 $ NQTE : AL,J. QU~E:S SW:X, dlq ARE ONLy IFC)R THE PARKWAYS ADJAC. Z3FTTO TRACT NO. 13717. Resolution No. 92-151 Page 23 / 3SESSNiENT DIAGF .M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 · -~ CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~! COUNTY OF SAN [~ERNARDIHO Resolution No. 92-151 ASSESS~T DIAG~A~ Page 24 LANDSCAPE IAINTENANCE DISTHICT NO. 4 COYOTE CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE RE~:~olution No. 92-151 I~ge 25 EXHI~IT 'A' - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ,~ ...--~ .. __.-- ..,, ,.~::'.' '~--: ..... I :~"" ': i " .' ~ '; ,""- ....... ~ ..... ~-,~ ""' ~ .:' 11 i~' ' ,, , .. · :, ~,~'/ -_'~J ,,..~ '. .:..~.! .. ~,, t ~ ::":"'~ .... i'". · :. . II · .: T' ~ i · i / ~ , , .. ,_._--:-__._;. ; , 9 · .~? !: .... ~::- I '--' , ' , -'/ I .~ ':-~ - 1 LEGEND CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~M/3//3 R~solution No. 92-151 Page 26 EXHIBIT 'A' · ~SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 \ 38 57 11 54 -~ 55 12 7 ~ 54 27 20 15 6 I 55 28 19 14 5 LEGEND ~ CITY MAINTAINED AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR. 13703 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 27 EXHIBIT 'A' ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 CI'I'Y O1~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN "'RNARDINO~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA . ~-os _ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 28 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7-~/33_5"/-/ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 29 EXHIBIT 'A' -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 30 Resolution No. 92-151 ~x~Bir 'A' [~age31 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANO$CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOg. 1 AND 6 CITY OIf IIAK~ C~IJGAMONGA r-,4)UNTY OII SAN ~RNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA - 5XHt8~7 'A' · Resolution No. 92-151 ASSeSSmEnT DaAGRAM Page 32 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANC~ DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~ STREET LIGHTS /~ CiTY ~1=' RAHCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO P,~.solution No. 92-151 Page 33 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 34 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pro!ected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #2 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $110,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. 'Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the prc~ection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 35 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1992/93 Total Personnel $10,460.00 Maintenance and Operations $5,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $9,870.00 General Liability $1,800.00 Electric Utilities $113.530.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $140,660.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $40,030.00 Delinquency Contingency $11,870.00 Total Revenue Required: $192,560.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover ( $14.620.00~ Assessment Revenue Required: $177,940.00 Analysis: The most significant impact on the proposed FY 92/93 budget is the increase in electricity costs of over $30,000 to a projected annual cost of over $110,000. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92/93 Assessment R~te; For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $29.30. That is up $9.30 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Us~ T..vpe [dni~ Rate Facior A.U. Reven:,~,. Commercial Acre 318.52 $29.30 2 $58.60 $18,670.00 Single Family Parcel 5.436.0Q $29.30 1 $29.30 $159.270.00 To ta I 5,754.52 $177,940.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 36 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 37 SLD2 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1991 TR 14192-1 26 AU ANNEXED NAY 15, 1991 TR 13114 21 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 TR 14866 47 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 CUP 88-28 1.04 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1991 PM 13113 2.0 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU Resolution No. 92-151 Page 38 EXMISIT '&, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 N.T.3. LEGEND ~ CXT~ MAXNTAIN~D AP. EA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF'CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 39 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET-LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'T~ I ~'~- Resolution No. 92-151 Page 40 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I c~ [ CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA ~ T~*,4. oo ' ~[~~~1 cou.t~ o~ sa. Iii_ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 41 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT APN 208-261-20 CITY OF RANCHO CUC)AMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO~ ~8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 42 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 · ' ' ' ~ '- · t ,~ ~1' * , .... , ~ -' / -- .J ~, ' '. :...1 . ~'.. .~:l ....... ~' ,~-. 1 ~ .~', ~-- ~ '~ ~ , ''~ I _ ~ .__ ~. ~ ~ ..~ '__. ~'~- ~ ~ -.? , ,~ ' LEGEND [~::~[~::~?/:~:~ Existing Homes CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 43 EXHIBIT 'A' ~;$SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 56 25 11 54 ~ .~ 26 12 7 .~ I 34 27 20 15 6 55 28 19 14 5 LEGEND ["~ CITY MAINTAINED AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA . TR. 13703 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 44 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 45 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 92/93 The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereo0 on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pro!ected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #3 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $70,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: P~solution No. 92-151 Page 46 Proposed Maintenance Budget fol' 1997,/9,~ Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $0.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $1,170.00 Electric Utilities $70.660.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $71,830.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $27,800.00 Delinquency Contingency $8.370.00 Total Revenue Required: $108,000.00 Add: Deficit Recovery $9.990.00 Assessment Revenue Required: $117,990.00 Analysis: The assessment rate for this district reflects an inflationary increase in costs. However, in past '.'ears the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In ~uture years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92/93 Assessment Rat~: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $29.74. That is up $9.74 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use T..vpe Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue Commercial Acre 98.26 $29.74 2 $59.48 $5,840.00 Single Family Parcel 3.771.00 $29.74 1 $29.74 $112.150.00 To ta I 3,869.26 $117,990.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 47 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 48 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992 / 93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 49 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 92/93 The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pro!ected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly 550,000. However, this amount is down by about $3,000 from FY 91/92. Other costs are down (Maintenance and Operations down $40,000) in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $27.72. The reason for this will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The proiected costs to operate and maintain SLD #4 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 50 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1992,/93 Total Personnel $58,160.00 Maintenance and Operations $10,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $5,000.00 General Liability $810.00 Electric Utilities $47.270.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $121,240.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $17,360.00 Delinquency Contingency $1.190.00 Total Revenue Required: $139,790.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover (. $31.200.00) Assessment Revenue Required: $108,590.00 Analysis: There ~re no substantial increases in the district's budget which exceed the inflation rate. However, in past }'ears the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92/93 Assessment Rat~ For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $27.72. That is up $7.72 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land U~ T..vpe Uni~ Rate FaOnr A.U. Revenu~ Commercial Acre 892.59 $27.72 2 $55.44 $49,490.00 Single Family Parcel 2.132.00 $27.72 1 $27.72 $59.100.00 To ta I 3,024.59 $108,590.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 51 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 52 SLD& ANNEXAT iONS ANNEXED JUNE 19. 1991 Pti 13825 27.7& AU ANNEXED NOVEHBER 20, 1991 TR 13351 118 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 20, 1~1 TR 13717 197 AU ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 18, COYOTE C~NYON ELEM 6.88 AU ANNEXED I~ARCH 6, 1991 TR 13351-1 8 AU Resolution No. 92-151 Page 53 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 54 EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 ,WEO/.~/v ~0~' ~ : 6219 LAIDSCAP! IIAZaTEIilCE DZSTBTC! !0. TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ( TRACT NO. 13351 ) -.~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 55 R~solution No. 92-151 Page 56 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 57 ELII IVEll]E SPII](:E IVIll~! CH01Cll STIL~E! ST./-T(~fT( 16000 L,UIII. ) 1 r.A. S'/*./..Z~i'r(9500 L.LIM. ) 6 r~. :3 FA. ST. L,.T~3fT'(SOO0 L.LII4.) 12 r.A,. sr. 't'A,m{15 GAL,.) 73 FA. 50 FA. 18 FA. PkRL'dAYLAJ,(I3SCAp'ZI4G 17.300 S.~. 9,400 S.r. 3.570 $ ~ : Ad..L. QUAH'T2'T~ES Sl. lO4,d~ &RKON~Y IIPOR THE P&RIC~Ays &DJACZ3,4'7 ~ '1'*RAC'T' I'qK3. 13717. Resolution No. 92-151 Page 58 LANDSCAPE N~I]~EN~N~E OIST~ICT NO. 4 COYOTE CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE COYOTE CANYON ELEM. SHOOL SITE / Resolution No. 92-151 Page 59 EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7-;~ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 60 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 61 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. $ (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 92/99 The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD #5 is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned -~,mmunity. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, soum of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. [t has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pro!ected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $27,000. While this amount is up compared to FY 91/92, the overall operating budget is down by over $2,000 in order to keep costs in line with the assessment rate of $33.19. The reason for this will be discussed below in the Analysis section of the report. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #5 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 62 Proposed Maint~nar~ce Budget for 1992/93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $12,780.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $520.00 Electric Utilities $27.330.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $40,630.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $8,790.00 Delinquency Contingency $2.730.00 Total Revenue Required: $52,150.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover ( $13.220.00) Assessment Revenue Required: $38,930.00 Analysis: Projected increases in electricty charges as mentioned above has the most significant impact on the increase in the assessment rate. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92/93 Assessment Rat~: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33.19. That is up $13.19 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20.00. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use T..vpe Units RoI~ FaclDr A.U, Revenue Single Family Parcel 1.173.00 $33.19 1 $33.19 $38.930.00 To ta I 1,173.00 $38,930.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 63 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 64 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial / Ind us trial ) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throu ;bout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district~ Gene ~lly this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been etermined that the facilities within this district benefit this area of the City. The si' s maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and tra :ic signals (or a portion thereoO on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothili Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $10,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #6 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 66 Proposed Maintenance Bud_ret for 199~93 Total Personnel $7,860.00 Maintenance and Operations $2,500.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $6,580.00 General Liability $250.00 Electric Utilities $10,450.00 Capital Improvements: Street Light Installation 3.130.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $30,770.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $3,720.00 Delinquency Contingency $1.950.00 Total Revenue Required: $36,440.00 Less: FY 91/92 Carryover ( $9.870.00) Assessment Revenue Required $26,570.00 Analysis: There are no significant increases in the budget beyond inflation. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidised by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years ti'tis will not be the case and as such could affect the district's assessment rate. FY 92/93 Assessment Ra~t~; For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $31.21. That is up $11.21 from the FY 91/92 rate of $20 ,~1. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use T..vpe Unils Rate Fac~r AU. Reven-~ Single Family Acre 851.41 $31.21 1 $31.21 ~ T o ta I 851.41 $ 26,570.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 67 I m , ~; ,, ~ ~,, ~ m ~ - _ ,_ ~ m ~,- ,- ~,-~--~~-m~ · --.------ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 68 SLD6 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED MAY 5, 1991 PM 7451 1.17 AU ANNEXED OCTOBER 16, 1991 CUP 91-11 2.38 AU ANNEXED DECEMBER 18, 1991 DR 68-09 1.06 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 1991 CUP 89-2620' 9.92 AU ANNEXED ~L'kRCN 20, DR 90-05 9.06 AU ANNEXEO JANUARY 15, 1992 ~ 89-13 .93 AU ANNEXED ~BRUARY 19, 1992 DR ~9-12 4.4 AU Resolution No. 92-151 Page 69 EXI~IT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND (3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 70 E.X HISIT ASSESSMENT DIAGFtAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 - CITY O~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO S TAT~ OF CALIF O R N IA Resolution No. 92-151 ~-^n,=~, .~. Page 71 -~ S~'SSMENT DIAGR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 72 EXHIBIT 'A' - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF' SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 73 EXHIOI? 'A' -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN% STATE OF CALIFORNIA ., ~.o5 _ Resolution No. 92-151 Page 74 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 Gn'Y OII RAN(~HO GI, H::AMON(IA C:OUNTY Oil SAN BIRNARDINO Resolution No. 92-151 EXHIBIT 'A' Paqe 75 ASSESSmEnT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIHTENANCE DISTRICT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 18.7~ ,33 I ~ STREET LIGHTS / L'~ STREET ~s ~~$ C~Z Z~~A- COUNTY OF SAN ~ERNARDINO STAT~ O~ CALI~OnalA Resolution No. 92-151 Page 76 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 77 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 92/99 The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pro!ected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #7 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over $11,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actUal FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actUal receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #7 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 78 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1992/93 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $200.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $200.00 Electric Utilities $11.770,00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $12,170.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $6,450.00 Delinquency Contingency $1.410.00 Assessment Revenue Required $20,030.00 Analysis: The increase in electricity costs is due to a projected increase in Edison charges along with an increase in the number of street lights being taken over for maintenance. FY 92/93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $33.32. That is up $1.16 from the FY 91/92 rate of $32.16. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district. Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Lard Use T..vpe Units Rate Factor A.U, Revenuo Single Family Parcel 601.00 $33.32 1 $33.32 $20.030.00 Total 601.00 $20,030.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 79 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 80 SLOT ANNEXAT]ONS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14139 120 AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 14380 ~ AU ANNEXED NOVEMBER 6, 1991 TR 1&379 35 AU Resolution No. 92-151 Page 81 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 82 % ~""'° '" I CITY OF RANCHO CU~AMON(;A STR~7 LI~;HFIN~ EN~NEE~S. ~NC TRACT NO. 14800 Resolution No. 92-151 PaG'e 83 9 o o 9 9 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 84 Preliminary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 85 City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 9Z/93 The FY 92/93 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by. development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Pro!ected Costs: The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #8 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly $4,000. A Delinquency Contingency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual FY 91/92 tax receipts. Should the actual receipts for FY 92/93 exceed the projection, that portion of the Delinquency Contingency equaling that exceed, and limited to a maximum of the total Delinquency Contingency, will be transferred into the operations budget. To the extent actual FY 92/93 tax receipts do not equal the Revenue Required for the year, services within the district will have to be cut. The projected costs to operate and maintain SLD #8 are as follows: Resolution No. 92-151 Page 86 Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1992/9~ Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operations $130.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $50.00 Electric Utilities $3.860.00 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $4,040.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $520.00 Delinquency Contingency $0.00 Assessment Revenue Required $4,560.00 Analysis: In FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD $$8. It has been determined that, with the inclusion of 35 additional parcels into the district and the accompanying street lights, the unit cost will still be approximately the same resulting in an assessment rate of over $125. While typically it would be expected that the assessment rate would drop as more units are added, it was found that the total budgeted amount for FY 91/92, and therefore the resulting assessment, was in fact understated and that the budget did not cover required costs of the district. Maintenance and Operations and General Liability were less than the required amount. The FY 92/93 budget reflects these required costs and results in an assessment rate of $126.31. FY 92J93 Assessment Rate: For FY 92/93 the rate per assessment unit is $126.31. That is up $4.39 from the FY 91/92 rate of $121.92 due to the above stated reasons. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Land Use T..vpe Unils Pain Faclr)r A.U. Revenue Single Family Parcel 36.00 $126.31 1 $126.31 $4.560.00 T° tai 36.00 $4,560.00 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 87 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 88 Resolution No. 92-151 Page 89