The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About92-149 - Resolutions RESOLUi~ONNO. 92-149 RESOLUTI(~ OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF RANf~O ~, OF PR~.T~INARY APPROVAL OF CITY DISTRICT (PD-85) RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo~ that: ~{~EAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, tb~ City ~gineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing f~r which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation I~ District (PD-85). WHEREAS, the City Eng~ has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report, attached hereto, in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for considera- tion. WHEREAS, said O~ncil has duly considered said report and each ar~ every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said re~, r~r any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, q]~EF-~RE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamong~ does hereby resolve to order as follows: !. That the Engineer's estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in c~nnection therewith, contained in said repc~c be, and each of th~m are hereby prelimi- narily approved and confirmed; and 2. ~at the diagrams showing the Amsess~ent District referred to and described in said report, the bouDdaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily 3. That the prc~ ~ upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessn~r~ District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby ~reliminarily approved and confirmed; and 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1992/93 for the purposes of all subsequ~ PASS~D, APPRDV~D, and ADOPI~D~ 6thday of May, 1992. Resolution No. 92-149 Page 2 AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams, Wright · NOES: None Dennis L. St~ut, Mayor C~_-bra J. ~, City Clerk I, DEB~A J. ADAMS, CITY Cr.1;'RK of the city of Rancho Cu~, California, do hex~by certify that the foregoing R~solution was duly p~sed, approved, and adopted by the City O~uncil of the City of Rancho California, at a rec3ular meeting of said City Oouncil held <n~ the 6th day of May, 1992. Executed this 7th day of May, 1992, at Rancho Oacamonga, California. be~ J. ~, city Clerk Resolution No. 92-149 Page 3 Preli .minary Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga PD-85 Fiscal Year 1992/93 Resolutic~ No. 92-149 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga . Annual Report PD-S5 Fiscal Year 1992/93 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 1992/93 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit - rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission fight-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. Improvement District Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terra Vista Planned Communities. Resolution No. 92-149 Page5 All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails. 2.The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. _: D. The assessment rate for the 91/92 FY is $52.00, this rate will increase to $5359 for the 92/93 FY. It is estimated that this increase to assessment rate will cover the maintenance costs and debt service for the 92/93 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits'shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. ~lut:ion No. 92-149 Pacje 6 Proposed Maintenance Budget: 92/93 Regular Payroll $237,510 Fringe Benefits $83,130 Vehicle Maint./Operations $24,000 Maintenance & Operations $45,000 Equipment Maintenance $6,000 General Liability $5,510 Contract Services $5,000 Capital Expenditures Install Calsense System $10,000 Heritage - Resurface Equestrian Rink $40,000 Install Touch Pad System For Lights $30,000 Water Utilities $87,000 Electric Utilities $40.000 Subtotal: $613,150 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $245,470 Delinquency Contingency $98,650 Debt Service $828.200 Gross Revenue Required: $1,785,480 Less: 91/92 District Carryover <$100.81{~> Total Assessment District Revenue Required: $1,684,664 --' METHOD OF SPREAD ' ~ The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among ali lots or parcels with the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining 'the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C - includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. R~lu~cion No. 92-149 Page 7 Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Number of Existing Res. Parcel Size Range Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 acres and 1 or more dwelling units 1.51 to 3.5 acres and 2 or more dwelling units 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 8 or more dwelling units 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 15 or more dwelling units 25.01 acres & larger and 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: ' All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownerships; 3. Railroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. Mineral rights; 6, Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $,500 and acres or less; and C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1992/93 is $53.59 per dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $53.59 times the number of dwelling units. Resolution No. 92-149 Page 8 Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1992/93 shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcel less than 1.50 acres $ 26.80 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $ 80,39 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres $ 18757 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres $ 375.13 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres $ 750.26 25.01 acres & larger $1,339.75 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 1992/93 ASSESSMENTS 22,728 Single Family Parcels 22,728 units at $53.59 = $1,217,993 241ulti-Family Parcels 4,793 unitsat $53.59 = $256,857 Less than 1.50 Acres (935) Parcels 926 units at $ 26.80 = $24,817 1.5 Acres to 3.50 Acres (409 Parcels) 404 units at $ 80.39 = $ 32,478 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres (227 Parcels) 226 units at $187.57 = $ 42,391 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres (131 Parcels) 125 units at $375.13 = $ 46,891 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres (45 Parcels) 45 units at $750.26 = $33,762 25.01 Acres or larger (23 Parcels) ~ $1,339.75 = $ 29.475 29,269 units $1,684,664 Resolution No. 92-149 ....... Page 9 Resolution No. 92-149 Page 10 PO 85 ANNEXATIONS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER &, 1991 TR 14866 47 AU ANNEXED NOVEHBER 20, 1991 TR 14192-1 26 AU ANNEXED MAY 15, 1991 TR 13114 21 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 20, 1991 TR 13703 55 AU ANNEXED FEBRUARY 6, 1~1 PM 13113 2.0 AU Resolution No. 92-149 Page 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I. ANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER I oo ,--~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' Resolution No. 92-149 Page 12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT STREET L. IGI-ITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 N.T.S. · CITY OF' RANCHO 4~U4~AMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Exmlslr 'a- Resolution No. 92-149 Page 13 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET-LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'A' ~o~io~ ~o. 92-~49~;$SESSMENT DIAGRAM Page 14 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 24. 10 9 53 25 11 8 54 -~ 35 26 12 7 , ~4 27 20 15 6 I ,,53 28 19 14. 5 LEGEND ~ CITY MAINTAINED AREAS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO#GA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO : TR. 1,~7("' ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ''~ EXHIEI? 'a' Resolution No. 92-149 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Page 15 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 '~ ........... "'"'~-- ' '' ~' "i ;' ':':...._...'_..,;.::~ ... ~',. __ .... I "-~'---~ '-' , ''"" ' " I' ": ..., ~./, ! ....... : ~ '". '1~ ~- ' ~ ,,f'"-~ ~ .,,..-_u~ ..-....:' ~'.." ~ .. .:-~ -'l ~. ! .... '" M" ~ ..~-., "~"'~" ~ '~ ..::- . : ~ ~ -.. ..~ .... : .. · . ~ J I-E~END ::::?":::::::??-': Existing Homes CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~. STATE OF CALIFORNIA -.~_