Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-113 - Resolutions RESOLUi~ONNO. 92-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~E CITY OF P4kN(~O C/R2AM~A, CALIFO~qIA, D~fING G~q~RAL PlAN ~ 92-02, SUBAREA A, TO AM~qD THE G~qI~RAL PLAN IAND USE MAP F~C~4 M~DII~4 RESIDent/AL (8-14 DW~LTNG ~ P~ AK~E) TO I3DW-M~DIL~4 RESID~iTAL (4-8 Eg;~.TNG L~ITM PR ACRE) FOR 5.71 Af~ES OF LAND ~ ON ~]{E SOU/~ SIDE OF ~I. BOULEVARD, WEST OF THE ~ C~FFK, AND MAKING FIND/lqGS IN SUPPORt THEREOF - APN: 207-211-18 THROUGH 21, 32, AND 34 (i) On April 6, 1981, the City of Rancho Cucamo~ approved the enautment of the General Plan throu~ the adoption of Resolution No. 81-40. (ii) On November 15, 1991, the City of Rancho CucamomFa filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 92-02, SLlbarea A, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the a~plication." (iii) On February 26, 1992, the Planning O--,~mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and follc~ing the conclusion of said public hearing, ad~ Resolution No. 92-25 recum~ending to the City Council that the application be denied. (iv) On April 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All leqal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resolution. NC~, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, ar~ resolve as foll~s: 1. %kis Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public test~, this Council hereby specifically finds as follc~s: (a) The application applies to 5.71 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamo~ Creek and is undevel~; said property is currently designat~ Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and Resolution No. 92-113 Page2 (b) The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Office and are partially developed with offices; the property to the scuth is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Corridor and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; the pro~ to the w~st is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a mobile hume park; and (c) This amendment conflicts with the Tmnd Use Policies of the General Plan and will not provide for develo~ within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related develop; and (d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of (e) The properties located in Subarea A of tb~.~ application are not suitable for the uses permitted in the uropcsed land use designation and are not compatible with existing and adjacent land use designatioms as evidenced by the mobile hcme park, flood control channel, and major divided arterial bordering the subject properties on three sides; in addition, there are no existing single family larx~ use designations in the immediate vicinity, therefore, the prcpoeed land use designation of I~um Residential wuuld (f) This amendment would not have significant impacts on tb~ and findings of the ~v~ Assessm~J~c. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusio~ set forth in para~ 1 and 2 above, this Ccuncil hereby resolves to deny General Plan Amendment 92-02, Subarea A, to amend the General Plan Lar~ Use Map frc~ F~dium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 5.71 acres of land located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, w~st of the Cucamonga Creek as shcm~ in Emh/bit "A." 4. ~he City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASS~D, ~, and ADOI~I~D th/s 15th day of April, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams Resolution No. 92-113 Page3 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY ~.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopt_~d by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamorga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of April, 1992. Executed this 16th day of April, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. f)e~-a J. A~ City Clerk Resolution No. 92-113 Page 4 vd. ~00' '~ a~ North EXHIBIT 'A"