HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-034 - ResolutionRESOLUTION NO.2023-034
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ENTER INTO
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH CVS, ALLERGAN, TEVA,
WALMART, AND WALGREENS, AGREE TO THE TERMS OF
THE RELATED STATE -SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND
AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO THE RELATED STATE -
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS WITH THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL
A. Recitals
1. The United States is facing an ongoing public health crisis of opioid abuse, addiction,
overdose, and death, forcing the State of California and California counties and cities
to spend billions of dollars each year to address the direct consequences of this crisis.
2. Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is multidistrict
litigation ("MDL") being pursued by numerous public entity plaintiffs against the
manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that the
defendants' unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic.
3. On or about November 14, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was
reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Walmart Inc. ("Walmart").
4. On or about November 22, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was
reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
and all of its respective past and present direct or indirect parents, subsidiaries,
divisions, affiliates, joint ventures, predecessors, successors, assigns, including but
not limited to Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis LLC (f/k/a Actavis Inc.), Actavis
Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Kadian LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. (f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc.),
Actavis Kadian LLC, Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. (f/k/a Watson Laboratories, Inc. —
Utah), Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC, Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
(f/k/a Watson Laboratories, Inc. — Florida), Actavis South Atlantic LLC, Warner Chilcott
Company LLC, and Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Anda Inc. (collectively, "Teva").
5. On or about November 22, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was
reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Allergan Finance, LLC (f/k/a Actavis,
Inc., which in turn was f/k/a Watson Pharmaceutics, Inc.) and Allergan Limited (f/k/a
Allergan plc, which, in turn, was f/k/a Actavis plc) (collectively, "Allergan").
6. On or about December 9, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was
reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and CVS Health Corporation and CVS
Pharmacy, Inc. and all of their past and present direct and indirect parent and
subsidiaries (collectively, "CVS").
7. On or about December 9, 2022, a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was
reached between the plaintiffs in the MDL and Walgreen Co. ("Walgreens").
Resolution No. 2023-034 — Page 1 of 4
8. CVS, Teva, Walgreens, Walmart, and Allergan shall be referred in this Resolution as
"Settling Defendants."
9. As part of the settlements with the Settling Defendants, local subdivisions, including
certain cities, that are not plaintiffs in the MDL may participate in the settlements in
exchange for a release of the Settling Defendants.
10. Copies of the proposed terms of those proposed nationwide settlements have been
set forth in the Master Settlement Agreements with the Settling Defendants.
11. Copies of the Master Settlement Agreements have been provided to the City Council
with this Resolution.
12. The Settlement Agreements provide, among other things, for the payment of a certain
sum to settling government entities in California including to the State of California and
Participating Subdivisions upon occurrence of certain events as defined in the
Settlement Agreements ("California Opioid Funds").
13. California local governments in the MDL have engaged in extensive discussions with
the State Attorney General's Office ("AGO") as to how the California Opioid Funds will
be allocated, which has resulted in the Proposed California State -Subdivision
Agreements Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds ("Allocation
Agreements") from the settlements with the Settling Defendants.
14. Copies of the Allocation Agreements for all of the settlements with the Settling
Defendants have been provided with this Resolution.
15. The Allocation Agreements allocate the California Opioid Funds as follows: 15% to
the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision
Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the
Settlements shall be combined pursuant to the Allocation Agreements, and 15% of
total from each settlement shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of
California Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA
Abatement Accounts Fund"), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund ("CA
Subdivision Fund").
16. Under the Master Settlement Agreements, certain local subdivisions that did not file a
lawsuit against the Settlement Defendants may qualify to participate in the settlements
and obtain funds from the Abatement Account Fund.
17. The City is eligible to participate in the Settlement and become a CA Participating
Subdivision.
18. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund (the 70% allocation) will be allocated
based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating
class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to
reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation
status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision (those above 10,000 in population).
The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA
Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 to the Allocation Agreements and
provided to the City Council with this Resolution. The City's share of the CA
Resolution No. 2023-034 — Page 2 of 4
Abatement Accounts Fund will be a product of the total in the CA Abatement Accounts
Fund multiplied by the City's percentage set forth in Appendix 1 of the Allocation
Agreements (the "Local Allocation").
19. A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share
as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation
share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which
the city is located, unless the city elects to take a direct election of the settlement
funds, so long as: (a) the county is a CA Participating Subdivision, and (b) the city has
not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at least
60 days prior to a Payment Date.
20. It the intent of this Resolution to authorize the City to enter into the Master Settlement
Agreements with the Settling Defendants by executing the Participation Agreements
and to enter into the Allocation Agreements by executing the signature pages to those
agreements.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. The City Council approves and authorizes the City Manager to settle and release the
City's claims against the Settling Defendants in exchange for the consideration set
forth in the Settlement Agreements, Allocation Agreements and all exhibits thereto.
2. All actions heretofore taken by the City Council and other appropriate public officers
and agents of the City with respect to the matters contemplated under this Resolution
are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Resolution No. 2023-034 — Page 3 of 4
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 51h day of April, 2023.
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
QA&U4�- f' a --
nice C. Reynolds, Ciq Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 511 day of
April, 2023.
AYES: Hutchison, Kennedy, Michael, Scott, Stickler
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
Executed this 6th day of April, 2023, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
10-
61 Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2023-034 — Page 4 of 4